Loading...
Agenda 01/14/2010 SCITY pokane 4.00Valleyk Spokane Valley Planning Commission Agenda Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave. January 14, 6:00 p.m. I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: VI. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject that is not on the agenda VII. COMMISSION REPORTS VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS OLD BUSINESS: NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARING-CODE AMENDMENT,DEVELOPER AGREEMENTS X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XI. ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF JOHN G.CARROLL,CHAIR KATHY MCCLUNG,CD DIRECTOR CRAIG EGGLESTON GREG MCCORMICK,PLANNING MGR,AICP RUSTIN HALL SCOTT KUHTA,SR.LONG RANGE PLANNER,AICP JOE MANN MIKE BASINGER,SENIOR PLANNER,AICP MARCIA SANDS,VICE CHAIR CARY DRISKELL,DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY ART SHARPE DEANNA GRIFFITH,ADMIN ARNE WOODARD WWW.SPOKANEVALLEY.ORG CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: January 14, 2010 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public hearing to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code as follows: Chapter 17.80.030-Update Table 17.80-1 to include Developer Agreements as a Type IV application and minor modifications to Developer Agreements as a Type I application. Chapter 17.80.140- Include Developer Agreements in the language that outlines Type IV applications. Chapter 19.30.015-Add language which provides for Developer Agreements in conjunction with Comprehensive Plan Amendments. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70B.170-210 PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Uniform Development Code was adopted in September of 2007 and was effective October 28`h, 2007. Following the adoption of the code, a number of items were discovered which were incorrect, impractical, or omitted. On August 11, 2009 the Spokane Valley City Council passed Ordinance 09-015, an emergency ordinance which provided for the creation of Developer Agreements, something that is not currently provided for in the Municipal Code. These agreements can only be considered in conjunction with Comprehensive Plan amendments and associated rezones and would provide both the developer and the City with the flexibility needed to carry out the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Some items that may be addressed through Developers Agreements include, but are not limited to, permitted uses, densities, building sizes, development conditions, design standards, impact fees, affordable housing and phasing. Minor modifications to these agreements may be approved by the Community Development Director based on criteria included in the regulations. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff's opinion is that the proposed amendments meets the approval criteria for amendments to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code and recommend that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the Spokane Valley City Council to amend the Municipal Code as stated above. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA STAFF CONTACT: Christina Janssen-Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: (1) Amended Text 17.80.030 Assignment of development application classification. A. Assignment by Table. Land use and development applications shall be classified pursuant to the following table: Table 17.80-1 —Permit Type and Land Use Application Type Land Use and Development Application SVMC Cross- Reference Accessory dwelling units 19.40.100 Administrative determinations by community development director, Multiple public works director, or building official Administrative exception 19.140 Administrative interpretation 17.50.010 Boundary line adjustments and eliminations 20.80 Building permits not subject to SEPA 21.20.040 Floodplain development 21.30 Grading permits 24.50 Type I Home occupation permit 19.40.140 Minor modifications of development agreements 19.30.015(I) Record of survey to establish lots within a binding site plan 20.60.040 Right-of-way permits 22.130.060 Shoreline permit exemption(dock permit) 21.50 Site plan review 19.130 Temporary use permit 19.160 Time extensions for preliminary subdivision, short subdivision or 20.30.060 binding site plan Alterations—Preliminary and fmal subdivisions, short subdivisions, 20.50 binding site plans Binding site plan—Preliminary and fmal 20.50 Binding site plan—Change of conditions 20.50 SEPA threshold determination 21.20.060 Type II Shoreline substantial development permit 21.50 Short subdivision—Preliminary and final 20.30,20.40 Preliminary short subdivision, binding site plan—Change of 20.30 conditions Wireless communication facilities 22.120 Conditional use permits 19.150 Planned residential developments 19.50 Plat vacation 20.70.020 Type Preliminary subdivision—Change of conditions 20.50 Subdivisions—Preliminary 20.30 Variance 19.170 Zoning map amendments (site-specific rezones) 19.30.030 Annual Comprehensive Plan amendments (text and/or map) 17.80.140 Area-wide zoning map amendments 17.80.140 Type Comprehensive Plan 17.80.140P� Development Agreements associated with Com r IV p Amendments Development code text amendments 17.80.150 Section four. amending SVMC 17.80.140: 17.80.140 shall be amended as follows: 17.80.140 Type IV Applications — Comprehensive Plan Amendments, Development Agreements associated with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, and Area- wide Rezones A. Initiation. Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Area Wide Rezones may be initiated by any of the following: 1. Property owner(s) or their representatives; 2. Any citizen, agency, neighborhood association, or other party; or 3. The Department, Planning Commission, or City Council. B. Applications. Applications shall be made on forms provide by the City. C. Application Submittal: 1. Applicant initiated: Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Area-Wide Rezones shall be subject to a pre-application conference, counter-complete, and fully- complete determinations pursuant to SVMC 17.80.080, 090, and 100. The date upon fully-complete determination shall be the date of registration with the Department. 2. Non-applicant initiated: After submittal of a non-applicant initiated application, the application shall be placed on the register. D. Register of Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Area-wide Rezones. The Department shall establish and maintain a register of all applications. E. Concurrent and Annual Review of Register. 1. Sixty (60) days prior to November 1st in each calendar year, the City shall notify the public that the amendment process has begun. Notice shall be distributed as follows: ai. Notice published in an appropriate regional or neighborhood newspaper or trade journal; b. Notice posted on all of the City's official public notice boards; and c. Copy of the notice sent to all agencies, organizations, and adjacent jurisdictions with an interest. 2. All registered applications shall be reviewed concurrently, on an annual basis and in a manner consistent with RCW 36.70A.130(2). Applications registered after November 1st of the previous calendar year and before November 1st of the current calendar year, shall be included in the annual review. Those registered after November 1st of the calendar year shall be placed on the register for review at the following annual review. 3. Emergency Amendments: The City may review and amend the Comprehensive Plan when the City Council determines that an emergency exists or in other circumstances as provided for by RCW 36.70A.130 (2)(a). F. Notice of Public Hearing. Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Area-Wide Rezones require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. 1. Contents of Notice. A Notice of Public Hearing shall include the following: a. The citation, if any, of the provision that would be changed by the proposal along with a brief description of that provision; b. A statement of how the proposal would change the affected provision; c. A statement of what areas, Comprehensive Plan designations, zones, or locations will be directly affected or changed by the proposal; d. The date,time, and place of the public hearing; e. A statement of the availability of the official file; and f. A statement of the right of any person to submit written comments to the Planning Commission and to appear at the public hearing of the Planning Commission to give oral comments on the proposal. 2. Distribution of Notice. The Department shall distribute the notice pursuant to SVMC 17.80.120(2). G. Planning Commission Recommendation — Procedure. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission shall consider the applications concurrently, and shall prepare and forward a recommendation of proposed action for all applications to the City Council. The Planning Commission shall take one of the following actions: 1. If the Planning Commission determines that the proposal should be adopted, it may, by a majority vote, recommend that the City Council adopt the proposal. The Planning Commission may make modifications to any proposal prior to recommending the proposal to City Council for adoption. If the modification is substantial, the Planning Commission must conduct a public hearing on the modified proposal; 2. If the Planning Commission determines that the proposal should not be adopted, it may, by a majority vote, recommend that the City Council not adopt the proposal; or 3i. If the Planning Commission is unable to take either of the actions specified in subsections (G)(1) or (2) above, the proposal will be sent to City Council with the notation that the Planning Commission makes no recommendation. H. Approval Criteria. 1. The City may approve Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Area-Wide Zone Map Amendments if it finds that: a. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment; b. The proposed amendment is consistent with the requirements of RCW 36.70A and with the portion of the City's adopted plan not affected by the amendment; c. The proposed amendment responds to a substantial change in conditions beyond the property owner's control applicable to the area within which the subject property lies; d. The proposed amendment corrects an obvious mapping error; or e. The proposed amendment addresses an identified deficiency in the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The City must also consider the following factors prior to approving Comprehensive Plan Amendments: a. The effect upon the physical environment; b. The effect on open space, streams, rivers, and lakes; c. The compatibility with and impact on adjacent land uses and surrounding neighborhoods; d. The adequacy of and impact on community facilities including utilities, roads, public transportation,parks, recreation, and schools; e. The benefit to the neighborhood, City, and region; f. The quantity and location of land planned for the proposed land use type and density and the demand for such land; g. The current and projected population density in the area; and h. The effect upon other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan. I. City Council Action. Within sixty (60) days of receipt of the Planning Commission's findings and recommendations, the City Council shall consider the fmdings and recommendations of the Commission concerning the application and may hold a public hearing pursuant to Council rules. The Department shall distribute notice of the Council's public hearing pursuant to SVMC 17.80.120(2). All annual amendments to the Comprehensive Plan shall be considered concurrently. By a majority vote of its membership, the City Council shall: 1. Approve the application; 2. Disapprove the application; 3. Modify the application. If the modification is substantial, the Council must either conduct a public hearing on the modified proposal; or 4. Refer the proposal back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. J. Transmittal to the State of Washington. At least sixty (60) days prior to final action being taken by the City Council, the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development (CTED) shall be provided with a copy of the amendments in order to initiate the sixty (60) day comment period. No later than ten (10) days after adoption of the proposal, a copy of the final decision shall be forwarded to CTED. Section five. amending SVMC 19.30: SVMC Chapter 19.30 shall be amended by adding a new section 19.30.015 as follows: 19.30 Changes & Amendments 19.30.010 Comprehensive Plan Text & Map Amendments Pursuant to RCW 36.70.130(2)(a) proposed updates to the Comprehensive Plan will be processed only once a year except for the adoption of original sub-area plans, amendments to the Shoreline Master program,the amendment of the Capital Facilities Chapter concurrent with the adoption of the City budget, in the event of an emergency or to resolve an appeal of the Comprehensive Plan filed with the Growth Management Hearing Board. Comprehensive Plan text and map amendments are classified as Type IV development applications and shall be processed pursuant to SVMC Chapter 17.80.140. 19.30.015 Development Agreements associated with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment A. Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.170 - 210. the city may enter into a development agreement with a person having ownership or control of real property within its jurisdiction as part of a comprehensive plan amendment and associated rezone. A development agreement and subsequent rezone shall be consistent with applicable development regulations set forth in the UDC. SVMC Chapters 17-24. B. Development Agreements associated with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment are classified as Type IV development applications and shall be processed in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and the regulations of RCW 36.70B.170 - 210. C. Development agreements associated with a comprehensive plan amendment and subsequent rezone may be used at the city council's discretion. Development agreements may be used to place restrictions on a proposed amendment to minimize the impacts of future development. D. Development agreement contents 1. For the purpose of this section. development standards may include. but are not limited to the following: a. Project elements such as permitted uses. residential densities. and nonresidential densities and intensities or building sizes: b. The amount and payment of impact fees imposed or agreed to in accordance with any applicable provisions of state law. any reimbursement provision, other financial contributions by the property owner. inspection fees. or dedications; c. Mitigation measures, development conditions. and other requirements under 43.21C RCW: d. Design standards such as maximum heights, setbacks. drainage and water quality requirements. landscaping. and other development features: e. Affordable housing: f. Parks and open space preservation: g. Phasing: h. Review procedures and standards for implementing decisions: i. A build-out or vesting period for applicable standards: and j. Any other appropriate development requirement procedure. E. The final decision authority for approval of the development agreement and development plan shall be the City Council set forth in SVMC Chapter 17.80.060 (D). F. The decision of city council on a development agreement and plan in conjunction with a comprehensive plan amendment and subsequent zoning change is the final decision of the city and may be appealed pursuant to RCW 36.70C. G. A development agreement shall be recorded with the Spokane County Auditor at the applicant's expense. During the term of the development agreement. the agreement is binding on the parties and their successors. H. The city will process and decide upon an application for an amendment as if it were an application for a new development agreement in a manner set forth above unless it is deemed a minor modification as set forth in(I) below. I. Modifications of development plan 1. The director of community development may approve minor modifications to the development plan pursuant to Chapter 17.80.030. 2. Criteria for approving minor modifications include but are not limited to the following: a. Shall conform to the terms of the development agreement; b. Shall not reduce landscaping. buffering. or open space areas c. Shall not reduce setback requirements d. Shall not result in an increase in height of any structure e. Shall not result in a change in ingress or egress f. Shall not increase any adverse impacts or undesirable effects g. Shall not significantly alter the project