Agenda 10/08/2009 SCIT1OF Spokane Valley Planning Commission Agenda
pokane Council Chambers, 11707 E. Sprague Ave.
\/alleyR Oct 8, 2009 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT: On any subject that is not on the agenda
VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS
OLD BUSINESS: DELIBERATIONS, STREET STANDARDS—JOHN HOHMAN
NEW BUSINESS: PUBLIC HEARING, CONTINUED CODE AMENDMENTS—TAVIS SCHMIDT
PUBLIC HEARING, CODE AMENDMENT -MIKE BASINGER
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION—PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PLAN FOR
THE SHORELINE MASTER PROGRAM—LORI BARLOW
X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
XI. ADJOURNMENT
COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF
JOHN G. CARROLL, CHAIR KATHY MCCLUNG, CD DIRECTOR
CRAIG EGGLESTON GREG MCCORMICK, PLANNING MGR,AICP
JOE MANN SCOTT KUHTA, SR. LONG RANGE PLANNER, AICP
MARCIA SANDS, VICE CHAIR MIKE BASINGER, SENIOR PLANNER, AICP
ART SHARPE CARY DRISKELL, DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY
TOM TOWEY DEANNA GRIFFITH,ADMIN
WWW.SPOKANEVALLEY.ORG
sookane
al a- n E:iii 0 li a -,'`.:
Valley
DATE:
NAME (PLEASE PRINT) ADDRESS WISH TO SUBJECT E-MAIL
SPEAK?
102.3 ES 15- Code 4u.ot441a-c--Q-44- ..,
1,Atz.'t Matl ,(;,,,v,...,,,....0-0-0127 iL) t,e, kre A.Mor,cluskt.Ce ttatepittne, AlVoC16) cpokyvxste\..t.w.€4 ;.,t• c Ott&
1.%1V(:::::-,k- ,e __A r , &\,- 56-,o N, rhot610, cy-es goie:-/072,-/-dxvoi- ("el ae_cirdeirro ,. croiwt
c:ks,)41 to - ( ,-d 2.5.---) , .5", 13es.1-- t t
/ i2 /.2o, 5 , / /Ye
' Yt/L/1-----Cj"I' --- :-7/O/Al)Nyie,:42 t_ - - t ( . LI
et4.,
C . `',,I . W• \Ni-\\, S\o-v)
C\-7--c__Al__ .,-?•\;\ ).E-I, . .- ._._,„-.e i\i\j A q(t _\)) A\D-77)
05/410
_5‘
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: October 8, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code as follows:
Chapter 19.20.06 - State that additions to nonconforming structures must meet current zoning
setbacks.
Chapter 19.40.100 — Remove language to clarify the size limits of Accessory Dwelling Units;
add that a manufactured house cannot be an Accessory Dwelling Unit.
Chapter 19.40.140 - State that a Home Occupation permit is required for any business person
or entity engaging in a for-profit enterprise in a residence. Add and clarify examples of not
allowed businesses.
Chapter 19.50— .050(G)2 Add the requirement that buildings must meet applicable building code
requirements; .060(C)3 Active recreation areas are Community Development Director
determined.
Chapter 19.120 -Add Self Storage/mini storage to permitted uses in both the I-1 and 1-2 zones.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.390 and RCW 35A.63.220
PREVIOUS PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The Uniform Development Code was adopted in September of 2007 and was
effective October 28th, 2007. Following the adoption of the code, a number of items were
discovered which were incorrect, impractical, or omitted. These amendments are corrections of
some of these items.
ANALYSIS: Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 17.80.150(6) provides approval criteria
that amendments of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code must meet. Those criteria include:
1. The proposed amendment(s) are consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed amendment(s) bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety,
welfare and protection of the environment.
Staff Comment: Staff constantly reviews and takes in comments regarding its Code provisions
in an effort to fix things that are incorrect, don't work as intended, were omitted in error, and to
remove those provisions that our experience shows us are unnecessary. We have been
accumulating a number of potential changes as they relate to code compliance-related
provisions, which are provided in the attachment.
SVMC 17.80.150(F) states that the City may approve amendments to the UDC if it finds that:
(1) The proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive
Plan; and
(2) the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare,
and protection of the environment.
LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods.
Requiring non-conforming structures to meet current setback standards protects neighborhoods
from additional impacts. Limiting the size and type of Accessory Dwelling Units will create
consistency throughout neighborhoods and enable residents to provide additional housing
options.
LUG-2 Encourages a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the
community's needs and preferences.
LUG-14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment.
HG-2 Encourages the use of affordable housing initiatives. By allowing Accessory Dwelling
Units, conditionally, it enables residents the opportunity to provide more affordable housing
options on already developed land.
EDG-1 encourages diverse and mutually supportive business development and the expansion
and retention of existing businesses within the City for the purpose of emphasizing vitality,
stability, and sustainability. Allowing self storage/mini storage to locate in the industrial zones,
allows for a wider range and flexibly of uses.
EDG-7 works to maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency,
predictability and clear direction.
LUG-14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. By requiring non-
conforming structures to meet current setbacks it improves the appearance and function by
making the structures more conforming.
Lastly, the remaining amendments are being proposed strictly to correct errors or
inconsistencies as follows:
Requiring all businesses based within a residence to obtain a Home Occupation permit
consistent with actual policy and procedures.
Correct and clarify requirements of the Planned Residential Development standards. Clarifying
how active recreation space area is determined; clarifying that structures must meet building
code standards.
The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code meet the above outlined goals, and are thus
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Staff's opinion is that the proposed amendments
meets the above noted criteria and recommend that the Planning Commission hold a Public
Hearing for these proposed amendments.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Tavis Schmidt, Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
(1) Amended Text
19.20.060 Nonconforming uses and structures.
A.Applicability.Legal nonconforming uses and structures include:
1. Any use,which does not conform with the present regulations of the zoning district in which it is
located shall be deemed a nonconforming use if it was in existence and in continuous and lawful
operation prior to the adoption of these regulations;
2. Any permanent structure in existence and lawfully constructed at the time of any amendment to
this code,which by such amendment is placed in a district wherein it is not otherwise permitted
and has since been in regular and continuous use;
3. Any permanent structure lawfully used or constructed that was in existence at the time of
annexation into the City and which has since been in regular and continuous use;
4. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to structures or uses deemed nonconforming only
pursuant to the Shoreline Management Act(Chapter 90.58 RCW)and the Spokane Valley
Shoreline Master Program(Chapter 21.50 SVMC).
B. Continuing Lawful Use of Property.
1. The lawful use of land at the time of passage of this code, or any amendments hereto,may be
continued,unless the use is discontinued or abandoned for a period of 12 consecutive months.
The right to continue the nonconforming use shall inure to all successive interests in the property.
It is specifically provided,however,that any nonconforming use discontinued as a result of
foreclosure or judicial proceedings, including probate, shall be permitted to continue for a period
not to exceed 24 months.Discontinuance of a nonconforming use shall commence on the actual
act or date of discontinuance.
2. A nonconforming use that is abandoned or discontinued shall not be replaced with another
nonconforming use.
3. A nonconforming use which has not been abandoned or discontinued may be replaced with the
following:
a. A conforming use;
b. Another nonconforming use; provided,that the new use is not less conforming than the prior
use. This determination will be made by the director based on the NAICS codes;
c. The proposed use places no greater demand on transportation and other public facilities than
the original use; or
d. The proposed use does not adversely affect or interfere with the use of neighboring property.
4. A nonconforming use may be expanded only within the boundaries of the original lot or tract and
any adjacent lot or tract that was under the same ownership as the lot or tract at the time the use
on the original lot or tract became nonconforming if:
a. The expanded use does not degrade the transportation level of service greater than the
original use; and
b. The expanded use does not adversely affect or interfere with the use of neighboring property;
and
c. Any transfer of ownership or interest on adjacent lots or tracts was made contemporaneously
with the transfer of ownership of the lot or tract on which the nonconforming use is located as
part of a single transaction; and
d. The expansion does not create additional development opportunities on adjacent tracts that
would not otherwise exist.
5. Residential lots made nonconforming relative to lot size, lot depth, setbacks and width shall be
deemed in conformance with this code,as long as the use of the lot is allowed in the respective
district.
6. Nonconforming uses that do not provide the required number of off-street parking spaces
pursuant to current standards shall not be considered as nonconforming.
7. Any nonconforming use damaged by fire,flood, neglect or act of nature may be replaced if:
a. Restoration of the use is initiated within 12 months; and
b. The damage represents less than 80 percent of market value.
8. Any nonconforming use changed to a conforming use shall not be permitted to convert to a
nonconforming use.
C.Nonconforming Structures.Expansion of a nonconforming structure is allowed in accordance with the
following:
1. The expansion or alteration does not change the occupancy classification under adopted building
codes;
2. The expansion or alteration does not create additional nonconformity with respect to building
setbacks or lot coverage; additions to nonconforming structures must meet setbacks as required
by the zoning district.
3. The number of dwelling units in a nonconforming residential structure does not increase so as to
exceed the number of dwelling units permitted within current regulations;
4. Off-street loading and/or parking, stormwater detention and landscaping shall be provided for the
alteration or expansion in accordance with current provisions; and
5. Any nonconforming structure damaged by fire,flood,neglect or act of God may be replaced if:
a. Restoration of the structure is initiated within 12 months; and
b. The damage represents less than 80 percent of market value of the structure.
D. Completion of Permanent Structures.Nothing herein shall require any change in the plans,
construction, or designated use of a building or structure for which a building permit has been issued or a
site plan approved by the City or Spokane County prior to incorporation of the City before the effective
date of this code,nor shall any building or structure for which a substantially complete application for a
building permit was accepted by the building official on or before the effective date of these regulations;
provided,that the building permit shall comply with all applicable regulations on the date that the
application was filed and the building permit is issued within 180 days of the effective date of these
regulations. (Ord. 07-015 §4, 2007).
e. The entrance to the ADU shall be located on the side or in the rear of the structure or in such
a manner as to be unobtrusive in appearance when viewed from the front of the street,and
only one entrance may be located on the facade of the principal dwelling unit in order to
maintain the appearance of a single-family residence;
f. The ADU unit shall not have more than two bedrooms; and
g. The ADU shall be designed to meet the appearance of a single-family residence and must be
the same or visually match the principal dwelling unit in the type, size and placement of the
following:
i. Exterior finish materials;
ii. ii.Roof pitch;
iii. Trim;
iv. Windows, in proportion(relationship of width to height) and orientation(horizontal or
vertical).
h. The ADU unit shall not be a manufactured home (as defined in 19-A).
2. Additional Development Standards for Detached ADUs.
a. Shall be located behind the front building setback line and placed on a permanent foundation;
b. Shall preserve all side yard and rear yard setbacks for a dwelling unit, as established in
SVMC 19.40.020,Residential standards;
c. Shall not be allowed on lots containing a duplex,multifamily dwelling or accessory
apartment contained within the principal structure; and
d. Existing detached accessory structures may be converted into detached ADUs; provided,that
all development standards and criteria are met, including side yard and rear yard setbacks.
D. Application Process.
1. Application for an ADU permit shall be made to the department of community development in
accordance with the permit procedures adopted by the department;
2. Shall include a letter of application affirming that one legal titleholder will live in either dwelling
unit,meeting the requirement of owner occupancy;
3. An ADU application shall also be filed as a deed restriction with the Spokane County department
of records and elections to indicate the presence of an ADU,the requirement of owner
occupancy,and other standards for maintaining the unit as described in this code; and
4. Cancellation of an ADU's registration may be accomplished by the owner filing a letter with the
department of community development for recording at the department of records and elections,
or may occur as a result of an enforcement action. (Ord. 08-006 § 1,2008; Ord. 07-015 §4,
2007).
19.40.010 General provisions.
A. No principal or accessory structure shall be located within the clearview triangle (Chapter
22.70 SVMC).
B. In the districts where the height of buildings is restricted to 35 feet, cooling towers, roof
gables, chimneys and vent stacks may extend for an additional height, not to exceed 40 feet,
above the average grade line of the building. Water stand pipes and tanks, church steeples,
domes and spires and school buildings and institutional buildings may be erected to exceed
maximum height requirements; provided, that one additional foot shall be added to the width
and depth of front, side and rear yards for each foot that such structures exceed the required
height.
C. No structure may be erected to a height in excess of that permitted by applicable airport
hazard zoning regulations.
D. Recreational vehicles shall not be used as permanent or temporary dwelling units in any
residential zone. Guests may park and/or occupy a recreational vehicle while visiting the
occupants of a dwelling unit located on the same lot for not more than 30 days in one
consecutive 12-month period. The intent is to accommodate visiting guests and not to allow the
recreational vehicle to be used as a dwelling unit.
E. Cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a permitted accessory structure in
any residential zone.
F. The following features attached to structures are allowed as exceptions to the setback
standards:
1. Minor Projections Allowed. Minor features of a structure, such as eaves, chimneys, fire
escapes, bay windows no more than 12 feet long and which cantilever beyond the foundation of
the structure, uncovered stairways, and uncovered decks or balconies, may extend into a
required setback up to 20 percent of the depth of the setback. However, they may not be within
three feet of a lot line when a setback is required. Wheelchair ramps are allowed to project into
the setback based on SVMC Title 24, Building Codes. Attached mechanical equipment such as
heat pumps, air conditioners, emergency generators and water pumps are allowed to project
into the side or rear setback only. (Ord. 08-026 § 4, 2008; Ord. 08-006 § 1, 2008; Ord. 07-015
§ 4, 2007).
19.40.100 Accessory dwelling unit(ADU).
Attached and detached ADUs are permitted in all residential zoning districts and shall adhere to the
appearance of single-family residences.An attached ADU is an accessory dwelling unit that has one or
more vertical and/or horizontal walls in common with, or attached to,the principal dwelling unit.A
detached ADU is a freestanding accessory dwelling unit that is not attached or physically connected to the
principal dwelling unit.
A. Purpose and Intent.
1. To increase the supply of affordable housing units and encourage housing diversity through better
use of the existing housing stock in neighborhoods in a manner that is less intense than new
development;
2. To make housing units available to moderate-income people and special populations including
the elderly,mentally ill,victims of domestic abuse,persons with disabilities or injuries, and the
homeless who might otherwise have difficulty finding homes within the city that support
independent living;
3. To provide residents,particularly seniors, single parents and families with grown children,with a
means to remain in their homes and neighborhoods by obtaining,through tenants in either the
ADU or the principal unit, extra income, companionship, security, and services;
4. To make better use of existing public investment in streets,transit,water, sewer, and other
utilities; and
5. To protect neighborhood stability,property values, and the single-family residential appearance
of neighborhoods by ensuring that ADUs are installed under the conditions outlined in this code.
B. Conditions and Limitations.
1. The design and size of the ADU shall conform to all standards in the building, plumbing,
electrical,mechanical,fire,health,utilities and any other applicable codes;
2. An ADU may be developed in conjunction with either an existing or new residence;
3. One ADU,attached or detached, is allowed per lot as an accessory dwelling unit;
4. The ADU must be a complete, independent housekeeping unit;
5. The combined footprint of all accessory structures shall not exceed 10 percent of the lot area;
6. Home professions shall be allowed only within the principal dwelling unit,not the ADU;
7. The owner, as established by the titleholder,must occupy either the principal dwelling unit or the
ADU as their permanent residence,but not both,for six months or more of the calendar year, and
at no time receive rent for the owner-occupied unit; and
8. Approval of an ADU will be revoked if the ADU is no longer in compliance with the
development standards and criteria outlined in subsection C of this section.
C. Development Standards and Criteria.
1. All ADUs,both attached and detached,must meet the following requirements:
a. One paved off-street parking space shall be required for the dwelling unit in addition to the
off-street parking required for the main residence;
b. The ADU may not exceed 50 percent of the total habitable footprint and 50 percent of the
habitable square footage of the principal dwelling unit,nor be less than 300 square feet;
c. The total number of individuals that reside in the ADU shall not exceed the number of
persons that are defined as a family;
d. The ADU shall be a complete, separate housekeeping unit;
19.40.140 Home occupations.
Any person. group or entity conducting a "for profit" enterprise from a location whose primary use is a
residence must obtain a home occupation permit. Home occupations are permitted as accessory uses,
incidental to the property's principal use as a residence subject to the following requirements:
A. Property shall retain a residential appearance and character;
B. All storage shall be enclosed within the residence or accessory structure;
C. There shall be a limit of two employees not residing on the premises engaged in the home occupation;
D. One unlighted sign placed flush against the exterior wall of the principal structure not exceeding four
square feet in area is permitted;
E. There shall be no window display nor shall sample commodities with the exception of flowers and
produce grown on the premises be displayed outside the building(s);
F. The hours of operation of a home occupation are limited to 7:00 a.m.to 10:00 p.m.;
G. The home occupation use shall not create electronic interference including,but not limited to,
interference with radio, satellite reception,telephone or television reception,nor generate measurable
levels at the property line of noise, dust,smoke, odor or glare.The home occupation activity shall not
generate solid waste in volume or type which is not normally associated with residential use unless
specifically permitted;
H. Loading docks and mechanical loading devices are not permitted; and
I. No traffic or parking of vehicles shall be generated by a home occupation in greater volumes than
normally expected in a residential neighborhood and any need for parking must be accommodated
within the required off-street parking for the dwelling unit. (Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007).
J. Uses which are considered detrimental to the residential appearance and character are not allowed as
home occupations (as per Appendix A-Definitions).
19.50.050 Development standards.
The following standards shall govern the administration of this chapter:
A. Relationship of PRD Site to Adjacent Areas. The design of a PRD shall take into account the
relationship of the site to the surrounding areas. The perimeter of the PRD shall be so designed as to
minimize adverse impact of the PRD on adjacent properties and, conversely,to minimize adverse
impact of adjacent land use and development characteristics on the PRD.
B. Site Acreage Minimum. The minimum site shall be five acres.
C. Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size provisions of other sections of the UDC do not apply in a
PRD, except that the minimum lot size requirements of the underlying zone shall serve as the
criterion to calculate the total number of dwelling units allowed in the proposed PRD based on the
gross acreage of the entire development.
D. Density. In a PRD,the hearing examiner may authorize a dwelling unit density not more than 20
percent greater than that permitted by the underlying zone,rounded to the nearest whole number;
provided,that the open space amenities described in SVMC 19.50.060 are met.
E. Maximum Coverage. Building coverage and development of the site shall not exceed the percentage
permitted by the underlying zone.
F. Landscaping Required.All common open space shall be landscaped in accordance with the
landscaping plan submitted by the applicant and approved by the hearing examiner.Natural landscape
features which are to be preserved, such as existing trees, drainage ways, rock outcrops, etc.,may be
accepted as part of the landscaping plan.
G. Setback and Side Yard Requirements.
1. Setbacks from the exterior boundary line of the PRD area shall be comparable to or compatible
with those of the existing development of adjacent properties, or, if adjacent properties are
undeveloped,the type of development which may reasonably be expected on such properties
given the existing zoning of such properties or the Comprehensive Plan and/or adopted subarea
plans;
2. Setbacks or Side Yards Between Buildings. The standard setbacks and yard requirements
between buildings may be waived in a PRD.Buildings may have common walls and,therefore,
built to the property line as in townhome construction. All buildings must meet applicable
Ibuilding code requirements.
H. All streets shall be designed and constructed to public street standards.
I. Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Chapter 22.50 SVMC.
J. Secondary Use Limitations.
1. Commercial uses are subject to site plan review procedures and shall be provided for in the
application for the development within which the commercial use is to be integrated;
2. The gross floor area of the commercial use shall not exceed the product of 50 square feet
multiplied by the number of dwelling units within the development;
3. Construction of at least 35 percent of the residences in the PRD must be completed before any
building permits will be issued for the construction of commercial uses, except this shall not
prohibit a sales office; and
4. Commercial uses within a PRD shall be of a size and type to serve primarily the residents of the
development, and shall be internally located to fulfill this function. (Ord. 07-015 § 4, 2007).
19.50.060 Open space standards.
Each PRD shall dedicate not less then 30 percent of the gross land area for common open space for the
use of its residents. Common open space areas shall meet the following criteria:
A. Location. The area proposed for open space shall be entirely within the PRD and within reasonable
walking distance of all dwelling units in the PRD. Where practical,the proposed common open space
shall be located adjacent to other established or planned park and recreational areas in adjacent
developments, schools, or City parks; provided,that such dedication would increase the overall
benefit to the residents of the PRD and conform to other criteria in this section.
B. Access.All dwelling units within the PRD must have legal access to the proposed common open
space at the time of final PRD approval.Private or access roads,trees or other landscaping may
separate the common open space area. However, access should not be blocked by major obstacles
such as arterial or collector roadways or significant natural features such as rivers, streams or
topographic features. Areas dedicated for active recreational open space shall have reasonable access
from street frontages. Design measures should accomplish the purposes of access and security.
C. Types of Open Space.
1. Land dedicated for open space should be usable for either greenbelts that serve as a buffer
between land uses,using existing vegetation, or an aesthetic amenity such as boulevard trees,
active recreational activities, or for protecting environmentally sensitive areas such as wetlands.
2. Except as provided in subsection(C)(3)or(4)of this section,a minimum of 30 percent of the
required common open space area shall be suitable for active recreation.The topography, soils,
hydrology, and other physical characteristics of the area proposed for active recreation shall be of
such quality as to provide a dry, obstacle-free space in a configuration which is suitable for active
recreation.
3. The percentage of active recreational areas may be increased to as high as 50 percent if it is
determined that anticipated recreational needs will require a larger percentage.In increasing this
percentage,the following standard should be used:the ratio of one acre to 125 residential units.
a. Community Development Director determines the amount of required active recreation
areas.
4. The percentage of active recreational area may be decreased to as low as 15 percent if it is
determined that:
a. Inclusion of buffers or environmentally sensitive lands such as wetlands would better
meet the open space needs of the residents of the subdivision; or
b. Meeting the standard would require detrimental grading or other disturbance of the
natural setting.
D. Land required for open space shall not include:
1. Accessory buildings,climate-controlled improvements,and areas reserved for the exclusive use
and benefit of an individual tenant or owner;
2. Dedicated streets, alleys or public rights-of-way,required landscaped areas,areas required for
yard depth or building setback or separation;
3. Vehicular driveways,private streets,parking areas,loading or storage areas; or
4. Floodplain(100-year),floodprone areas, drainage easements,natural drainage areas or creeks
unless maintained as an amenity and specifically approved as being suitable for open space.
E. Implementation. The area proposed for open space shall be dedicated in common to the property
owners within the plat or to a homeowners' association. Maintenance and operation of the dedicated
open space shall be the responsibility of the property owners' or homeowners' association.
1. The City may choose to accept dedication,maintenance and operation responsibilities when the
common open space area to be dedicated is in the public interest and either one or a combination
of the following:
a. Greater than 10 acres;
b. Adjacent to an established or future City park or school grounds;
c. Is an access to a body of water greater than three acres in size; or
d. Is an environmentally sensitive area.
2. The dedication shall be identified on the PRD plan.
F. Improvements.The following improvements to the area proposed for dedication may be required
prior to final approval of the PRD:
1. Removal of construction debris and hazards; and
2. Rough grading and establishment of grass cover over those portions of the site suitable for
playfields.
G. Equivalent Facilities. When areas proposed for dedication do not meet the criteria for dedication in
this chapter, such land may be improved by grading,filling, landscaping, or with installation of
recreation equipment so as to be equivalent in result to the intent of this chapter. Determination of
equivalency shall be made by the director according to the following guidelines:
1. The proposed land and improvements must create recreational opportunities generally equivalent
to or greater than the land required for the residents within the PRD;
2. The proposed land and improvements must not result in significant disturbance or alteration of an
environmentally sensitive area, unless otherwise allowed by the City;
3. The proposed land and improvements shall be dedicated in accordance with subsection F of this
section.
H. Stormwater Detention Facilities. Stormwater detention ponds may be allowed by the City as part of
dedicated open space subject to the following criteria:
1. The detention pond shall be constructed so as to drain fully when precipitation is not occurring
(i.e.,no standing water may be left)unless the pond is designed as an aesthetic amenity;
2. The side slope of the detention pond shall not exceed 33 percent unless slopes are existing,
natural and covered with vegetation;
3. If detention facilities are located adjacent to or near a natural,year-round stream or wetland,these
systems shall be left in natural or near-natural condition;
4. The detention area shall be landscaped in a manner which is both aesthetic and able to withstand
the inundation expected;
5. Use of a dedicated open space area for stormwater detention shall not be acceptable if the
detention area must be fenced or otherwise rendered unsuitable or unavailable for recreation use
during dry weather; and
6. In the case of joint use of open space for detention and recreation,the home owners or
homeowners' association shall be responsible for maintenance of the detention facilities.
I. Rights and Duties. The owners of open space shall have the following rights which may be exercised
in respect of such land, subject to restrictive covenants or other restrictions:
1. The right to locate recreational facilities, such as tennis courts, swimming pools,picnic tables,
and fireplaces(accessory to picnic tables)designed to be used exclusively for the use of residents
of the development and their guests;
2. The right to locate pedestrian paths,bicycle paths and bridle paths;
3. The right to take whatever measures are reasonably necessary to protect and maintain such land,
or land or property adjacent thereto, or to correct a hazardous condition posing a threat to life or
limb;
4. The right to regulate access to or entry on the open space land and duty to maintain such land.
(Ord. 07-015 § 4,2007).
Home occupation: An occupation, profession or craft incidental to the residential use,
excluding an adult retail use establishment, adult bookstore or adult entertainment
establishment. Auto repair; small engine repair: welding or metal plating shops; large
appliance/electronics or equipment repair or service; truck hauling and/or tow storage yard;
vehicle sales; cabinet making; manufacturing and/or related storage; kennel or stables;
wholesale or retail sales and restaurants/drinking establishments are not home occupations.
Chapter 19.120
PERMITTED AND ACCESSORY USES
Sections:
19.120.010 General.
19.120.010 General.
Uses are classified using the 2002 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) published by the U.S. Census Bureau
based on category and subcategory. Subcategories include all uses not identified separately by specific number. Uses may be
permitted, be subject to conditions, or require conditional or temporary use permits as shown in Appendix 19-A, the schedule of
permitted and accessory uses.
w a)
o N m •x m o � > 'U > c = m _
u co d r" n S = N i i = L = .L = `' 4-I >> = O
r N M d r N (n 7 K .a C i N O O v O O = N O O = = ._ > i
7 I LL LL 0 V 'a .2 "a d O O U =0 a) E .Q E E E BE E .5 0 d a) '0
w O 0. O V (7 00 00 0 U N U
a. < U
1 P P 49 49319 Storage, self-service facility P P P P P P
P Permitted Use A Accessory Only
R Regional Siting T Temporary Permit
S Conditions Apply C Conditional Use
Permit
Page 1 of 1
Staikan� Department of Community Development
j\dille`' Planning Division
Planning Commission
Public Hearing
<k.nendments to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code
October 8, 2009
Sokanc
�, Department of Community Development
l Planning Division
Proposed Amendments
• Chapter 19.20.060 - Nonconforming structures
• Chapter 19.40.010 - Permitted accessory structures in
residential zone.
• Chapter 19.40.100 - Accessory Dwelling Units
• Chapter 19.40.140 -A Home Occupations
• Chapter 19.50.050 - Planned Residential Developments
• Chapter 19.120 - Schedule of Permitted Uses
1
Spy k/� Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Nonconforming uses and structures
19.20.060 C. Nonconforming Structures
The expansion or alteration does not create additional
nonconformity with respect to building setbacks or lot CO\,:ra2.c.
--- —
Spokan` c Deepartment of Community Development
Planning Division
Nonconforming uses and structures
19.20.060 C. Nonconforming Structures
The expansion or alteration does not create additional
nonconformity with respect to building setbacks or lot coverage;
additions to nonconforming structures must meet setbacks as
required by the zoning district.
Non- New
conforming Addition
2 feet structure 5 feet
Property Line
2
Department of Community Development
jval Planning Division
District purpose and supplemental use
regulations — Residential Zones
19.40.010 General provisions.
E. Cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a
permitted accessory structure in any residential zone.
Spokane
�-. Department of Community Development
••••"*Valitr Planning Division
District purpose and supplemental use
regulations — Residential Zones
19.40.100 Accessory dwelling unit (ADU)
C. Development Standards and Criteria.
1.All ADUs, both attached and detached, must meet the
following requirements:
b. The ADU may not exceed 50 percent of the total habitable
footprint and 50 percent of the habitable square footage of the
principal dwelling unit, nor be less than 300 square feet;
3
Department of Community Development
a Planning Division
District purpose and supplemental use
regulations — Residential Zones
19.40.100 Accessory dwelling unit(ADU)
C. Development Standards and Criteria.
1. All ADUs, both attached and detached, must meet the
following requirements:
b. The ADL may not exceed 50 percent of the total habitable
footprint and 50 percent of the habitable square footage of the •
principal dwelling unit, nor be less than 300 square feet;
h. The ADU unit shall not be a manufactured home (as defined
in Appendix A- definitions).
•
Spiikaroe Department of Community Development y
JVaIk r-- Planning Division
Accessory dwelling unit (ADU) Comparison
Spokane County Code
.The second unit is created auxiliary to and is always smaller
than the primary residence.
'Detached ADUs are a Conditional Use (Separate from
Dependent relative)
"Conditional Use Permit requires a public hearing before the
Hearing Examiner.
4
Department of Community Development
jVeltomme Planning Division ]
Accessory dwelling unit (ADU) Comparison
City of Spokane Code
•Must be combined withgarage or only detached structure in
rear yard.
•Minimum and Maximum lot size requirements
•Detached ADU shall not exceed 600 square feet
•Restrictive design criteria(Exterior finish materials,trim,
windows, wall height. building coverage limitation)
'1 ✓� Department of Community Development
S�i�ikanc
`j j�a►Ic} �r Planning Division
District purpose and supplemental use
regulations — Residential Zones
19.40.140 Home occupations.
Home occupations are permitted as accessory uses, incidental to
the property's principal use as a residence subject to the
following requirements:
5
n � Department of Community Development
tlli«_ ,i Planning Division 6,11111
District purpose and supplemental use
regulations — Residential Zones
19.40.140 Home occupations.
Any person, group or entity conducting a "for profit" enterprise
from a location whose primary use is a residence must obtain a
home occupation permit. Home occupations are permitted as
accessory uses. incidental to the property's principal use as a
residence subject to the following requirements:
J. Uses which are considered detrimental to the residential
appearance and character are not allowed as home occupations
(as per Appendix A- Definitions).
� �`. Department of Community Development
jne.' Planning •Division
Definitions
Home occupation: An occupation, profession or craft incidental
to the residential use, excluding an adult retail use
establishment, adult bookstore or adult entertainment
establishment.Auto repair: small engine repair-, welding or
metal plating shops; large appliance/electronics or equipment
repair or service; truck hauling and/or tow storage yard; vehicle
sales; cabinet making; manufacturing and/or related storage;
kennel or stables; wholesale or retail sales and
restaurants/drinking establishments are not home occupations.
6
Department of Community Development
jMel Planning Division
Planned Residential Developments
19.50.050 Development standards
The following standards shall govern the administration of this
chapter:
G. Setback and Side Yard Requirements.
2. Setbacks or Side Yards Between Buildings. The
standard setbacks and yard requirements between buildings may
be waived in a PRD. Buildings may have common walls and,
therefore, built to the property line as in townhome construction.
Department of Community Development
Slifikanc
j�a1e>, Planning Division
Planned Residential Developments
19.50.050 Development standards
The following standards shall govern the administration of this
chapter:
G. Setback and Side Yard Requirements.
2. Setbacks or Side Yards Between Buildings. The
standard setbacks and yard requirements between buildings may
be waived in a PRD. Buildings may have common walls and,
therefore. built to the property line as in townhome construction.
All buildings must meet applicable building code requirements.
7
Department of Community Development
iNsligi
Planning Division
Planned Residential Developments
19.50.060 Open space standards.
Each PRD shall dedicate not less then 30 percent of the gross
land area for common open space for the use of its residents.
Common open space areas shall meet the following criteria:
C. Types of Open Space.
3. The percentage of active recreational areas may be
increased to as high as 50 percent if it is determined that
anticipated recreational needs will require a larger percentage. In
increasing this percentage, the following standard should be
used: the ratio of one acre to 125 residential units.
C r o shioa contamersand s�rn• ren to tres ar no win accpsso strut i re m nv re war at ;rte." S�OIUIIIC
Planning Division
Planned Residential Developments
19.50.060 Open space standards.
Each PRD shall dedicate not less then 30 percent of the gross
land area for common open space for the use of its residents.
Common open space areas shall meet the following criteria:
•
C. Types of Open Space.
3. The percentage of active recreational areas may be
increased to as high as 50 percent if it is determined that
anticipated recreational needs will require a larger percentage. In
increasing this percentage, the following standard should be
used: the ratio of one acre to 125 residential units.
a. Community Development Director determines the amount
of required active recreation areas.
8
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Chapter 19.120 Permitted and Accessory Uses
• Update matrix to allow Storage, self-service facility in areas zoned
1-1 Light Industrial and I-2 Heavy Industrial
01 O
NT
• c
7` e O O
rcszvLL 2 CxM �taaEEE•TEu `'va s yE? t o tgac
= y rc V
uU
P P 49 4 Storage,self-service facility P P P P P
3
19
P Permitted Use A Accessory
Only
R Regional Siting T Temporary
Permit
S Conditions Apply C Conditional
Use Permit
!! , Department of CommunityDevelopment
\Ala Planning Division
Questions?
9
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: October 8, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
FILE NUMBER: CTA-04-09
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing - amendments to Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
Chapter 19.40.010 — State that cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a
permitted accessory structure in any residential zone.
Chapter 19.20.06 - State that additions to nonconforming structures must meet current zoning
setbacks.
Chapter 19.40.100 — Remove language to clarify the size limits of Accessory Dwelling Units;
add that a manufactured home cannot be an Accessory Dwelling Unit.
Chapter 19.40.140 - State that a Home Occupation permit is required for any business person
or entity engaging in a for-profit enterprise in a residence. Add and clarify examples of not
allowed businesses including adding "small engine repair" to the list of definitions.
Chapter 19.50— .050(G)2 Add the requirement that buildings must meet applicable building code
requirements; .060(C)3 Active recreation areas are Community Development Director
determined.
Chapter 19.120 -Add Self Storage/mini storage to permitted uses in both the I-1 and 1-2 zones.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 19.30.040 Development regulation text amendments.
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Planning Commission conducted a study session on September
24, 2009
BACKGROUND: The Uniform Development Code was adopted in September of 2007 and was
effective October 28th, 2007. Following the adoption of the code, a number of items were
discovered which were incorrect, impractical, or omitted. These amendments are corrections of
some of these items.
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Spokane Valley Municipal Code Section 17.80.150(6) provides
approval criteria that amendments of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code must meet. Those
criteria include:
1. The proposed amendment(s) are consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed amendment(s) bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety,
welfare and protection of the environment.
Staff Comment: Staff constantly reviews and takes in comments regarding its Code provisions
in an effort to fix things that are incorrect, don't work as intended, were omitted in error, and to
modify those provisions that follow adopted policy and procedure.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Planning Commission may recommend approval as
presented; recommend approval of modified proposal, recommend the proposal not be adopted,
or forward no recommendation to City Council.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: NA
STAFF CONTACT: Tavis Schmidt, Assistant Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft text amendments
SEPA determination
Findings and Recommendations
*WaneCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
�ualleyA
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 Fax: 509.921.1008 cityhall@spokanevalley.org
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
File Number: CTA-04-09
Description of proposal: Proposed text amendments amending the following sections of the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code: 19.20.060(additions to non-conforming structures must meet setbacks), 19.40.140(Home Occupation definition,
garages not included in space calc.,criteria), 19.40.100(Accessory dwelling unit size relation to main dwelling, size limit),
19.50.050G(2)(must meet building code requirements), 19.50.060C(3)(active recreation areas—director determined)and
19.120(add self storage/mini storage to permitted uses in I-1 and 1-2)
Location of proposal: N/A
Lead Agency: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department,Planning Division
Determination: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, the lead agency
has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The threshold determination is
available to the public upon request.
DNS issued under WAC 197-11-340(2)
Responsible Official: Staff Contact:
Kathy McClung, Community Development Director Tavis Schmidt,Assistant Planner
City of Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley Community Development
Department Department
Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite
106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
PH: (509) 688-0030/FX: (509)921-1008 PH: (509)688-0046/FX: (509) 921-1008
kmcclung@spokanevalley.org tschmidt@spokanevalley.org
Date issued: October 2,2009 Signature:
APPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the Community Development Department within fourteen
(14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's
threshold determination. Appeals shall be in conformance with Section 17.90 (Appeals) of the Spokane Valley Municipal
Code. At the time of appeal submittal, required fees are due pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule. Pursuant to
WAC 197-11-680, appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
October 8,2009
The following findings have been prepared by Staff for the Planning Commission in the event there is
concurrence with the recommended approval.
Background:
A. The Uniform Development Code was adopted in September 2007 and became effective on
October 28,2007.
B. Following the adoption of the code a number of items were found to be either incorrect,
impractical, or omitted.
C. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 8,2009. The Planning Commission
approved the following amendments to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code,Title 19:
Chapter 19.40.010—State that cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a permitted
accessory structure in any residential zone.
Chapter 19.20.06- State that additions to nonconforming structures must meet current zoning setbacks.
Chapter 19.40.100—Remove language to clarify the size limits of Accessory Dwelling Units; add that a
manufactured home cannot be an Accessory Dwelling Unit.
Chapter 19.40.140- State that a Home Occupation permit is required for any business person or entity
engaging in a for-profit enterprise in a residence. Add and clarify examples of not allowed businesses
including adding"small engine repair"to the list of defmitions.
Chapter 19.50—.050(G)2 Add the requirement that buildings must meet applicable building code
requirements; .060(C)3 Active recreation areas are Community Development Director determined.
Chapter 19.120 -Add Self Storage/mini storage to permitted uses in both the I-1 and I-2 zones.
Findings:
SVMC 17.80.150(F)states that the City may approve amendments to the UDC if it finds that:
(1)the proposed amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the Comprehensive Plan; and
(2)the proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to the public health, safety,welfare, and
protection of the environment.
LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods. Requiring non-
conforming structures to meet current setback standards protects neighborhoods from additional impacts.
Limiting the size and type of Accessory Dwelling Units will create consistency throughout neighborhoods
and enable residents to provide additional housing options.
LUG-2 Encourages a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's
needs and preferences.
LUG-14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment.
HG-2 Encourages the use of affordable housing initiatives. By allowing Accessory Dwelling Units,
conditionally, it enables residents the opportunity to provide more affordable housing options on already
developed land.
EDG-1 encourages diverse and mutually supportive business development and the expansion and
retention of existing businesses within the City for the purpose of emphasizing vitality, stability,and
sustainability. Allowing self storage/mini storage to locate in the industrial zones,allows for a wider
range and flexibly of uses.
EDG-7 works to maintain a regulatory environment that offers flexibility, consistency,predictability and
clear direction.
LUG-14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. By requiring non-conforming
structures to meet current setbacks it improves the appearance and function by making the structures more
conforming.
Lastly,the remaining amendments are being proposed strictly to correct errors or inconsistencies as
follows:
Requiring all businesses based within a residence to obtain a Home Occupation permit consistent with
actual policy and procedures.
Correct and clarify requirements of the Planned Residential Development standards. Clarifying how
active recreation space area is determined; clarifying that structures must meet building code standards.
The proposed amendments to the Municipal Code meet the above outlined goals, and are thus consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusions:
The proposed amendments meet the applicable provisions of the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
Recommendations:
The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends approval to the City Council of
proposed amendments to Title 19 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code.
Approved this 8th day of October,2009
John G. Carroll,Chairman
ATTEST
Deanna Griffith,Administrative Assistant
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Review
Meeting Date: October 8, 2009
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ® public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
FILE NUMBER: CTA-05-09
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing — Amendment to Spokane Valley Municipal Code
(SVMC)
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: A privately initiated text amendment to the SVMC providing
density incentives for developments that include an affordable housing component in the
Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1) and the Multifamily High Density
Residential District (MF-2), Corridor Mixed Use (CMU), Mixed Use (MU), Mixed Use Avenue
(MUA), City Center (CC) and Community Boulevard (CB) district zones.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: SVMC 19.30.040 development regulation text amendments
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: Planning Commission conducted a study session on October 1,
2009
BACKGROUND: In 2006, the City of Spokane Valley adopted their first Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan includes several policies and goals regarding affordable housing.
Policy HP-1.3 of the Comprehensive Plan calls for development regulations and incentives that
encourage greater diversity of housing types, costs, and designs that may include bonus
incentives, clustering, and transfer development rights.
The intent of the proposed text amendment is to develop regulations that promote affordable
housing in the Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1) and the Multifamily High
Density Residential District (MF-2), Corridor Mixed Use (CMU), Mixed Use (MU), Mixed Use
Avenue (MUA), City Center(CC) and Community Boulevard (CB) zoning classifications by
allowing density bonuses in exchange for the inclusion of affordable housing units within the
development. Staff has developed a recommended regulation in cooperation with Northeast
Washington Housing Solutions, and the applicant's representatives to provide density incentives
to encourage affordable housing and criteria to ensure the project is well designed and has
additional amenities that contribute to the quality of life for the residents.
NOTICE: Notice for the proposed amendment to SVMC was placed in the Spokane Valley
News Herald on September 18, 2009. Notice for the proposed amendment was provided
consistent with applicable provisions of Title 17. The City of Spokane Valley provided a media
release on September 28, 2009 further notifying the public of the privately initiated text
amendment.
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Section 17.80.150(6) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code provides
approval criteria for text amendments to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code. The criterion
stipulates that the proposed amendment(s) must be consistent with the applicable provisions of
1 of 2
the Comprehensive Plan and bear a substantial relation to the public health, safety, welfare, and
protection of the environment.
OPTIONS: Planning Commission may recommend approval as presented; recommend
approval of modified proposal, recommend the proposal not be adopted, or forward no
recommendation to City Council.
STAFF CONTACT:
Mike Basinger, AICP, Senior Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Draft Affordable Housing Regulations
Staff Report and Planning Commission Findings
SEPA Determination
Agency Comments
Public Comments
2 of 2
Chapter 19.35
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS
Sections:
19.35.010 Purpose
19.35.020 General
19.35.030 Applicability
19.35.040 Density Calculations
19.35.050 Development Standards
19.35.060 Siting
19.35.070 Approval
19.35.080 Affordability Agreement
19.35.010 Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to provide density incentives to residential
developments to help achieve consistency with the Growth Management Act, the City's
Comprehensive Plan, and countywide planning policies for Spokane County.
19.35.020 General. The provisions of this section are available, at the sole discretion of the
property owner, as incentives to encourage construction of housing affordable to low and moderate-
income households for new multifamily developments. In exchange for residential density bonuses,
the development is required to provide a well-designed project with additional amenities contributing
to the quality of life for the residents.
19.35.030 Applicability. This chapter applies to MF-1, MF-2, CMU, MU, MUA, CC, and CB
district zones. Development incorporating affordable housing component may increase the dwelling
unit density in the underlying zone, rounded to the nearest whole number in accordance with
19.35.040, provided that required amenities and site design criteria are met. If the density bonus
results in an odd number of housing units, the odd unit must be applied as an affordable unit.
Projects must be a minimum of twenty units to be eligible for a residential density bonus.
19.35.040 Density Calculations.
A. New multifamily or mixed-use projects may provide affordable units as part of the project. One
bonus market rate unit is permitted for each affordable unit based on the following criteria:
1. Affordable housing units provided to families whose income is at or below 40 percent of
median income may increase the underlying base density by 40 percent.
2. Affordable housing units provided to families whose income is at or below 50 percent of
median income may increase the underlying base density by 30 percent.
3. Affordable housing units provided to families whose income is at or below 60 percent of
median income may increase the underlying base density by 20 percent.
4. Affordable housing developments may increase the underlying base density an
additional 10 percent by providing one of the following:
a. LEED certification or equivalent
b. alternative energy
c. covered bus shelter
d. underground parking
e. other amenities approved by the Director
5. Affordable housing developments may also increase their density by providing
additional amenities in the required useable open space:
a. benches and fountain —an additional increase of density up to 5 percent
b. playground apparatus—an additional increase in density up to 10 percent
c. sport court—an additional increase in density up to 10 percent
1 of 3
d. Indoor Recreational Facility— an additional increase in density up to 20
percent
e. other amenities as approved by the Director—additional increase shall not
exceed 10 percent
6. Notwithstanding paragraphs 5(a-e), overall density of a project cannot increase by
more than 60 percent of the underlying zone rounded to next whole number.
19.35.050 Development Standards.
A. The Director may allow the maximum building height to be exceeded by not more than 25
percent
B. The Director may allow exceptions to yard setback requirements where the deviation is for 10
percent or less of the required yard
C. In addition to the open space requirements of SVMC 19.40.020 developments receiving a
density bonus under this Chapter shall provide an additional 5 percent open space (total of 15
percent) to accommodate the additional residents associated with the residential density bonus.
D. Site Design Criteria. All developments under this provision shall be subject to the following
site design criteria.
1. Natural amenities such as views, significant or unique trees, or grouping of trees,
creeks, riparian corridors, and similar features unique to the site shall be incorporated
into the design.
2. Emphasize, rather than obscure, natural topography. Buildings shall be designed to
"step up" or"step down" hillsides to accommodate significant changes in elevation.
3. Projects shall have design continuity by using similar elements throughout the project
such as architectural style and features, materials, colors, and textures.
4. Placement of physical features such as play equipment shall be in visible locations to
maximize the ability to be seen, and therefore creating a safe environment that
discourages crime.
5. Parking structures shall be architecturally consistent with exterior architectural
elements of the primary structure(s); including rooflines, façade design, and finish
materials.
6. Pedestrian pathways and pedestrian areas shall be delineated by separate paved
routes using a variation in paved texture and color, and protected from abutting vehicle
circulation areas with landscaping or other methods.
19.35.060 Siting. The affordable units constructed under the provisions of this chapter shall be
included within the parcel of land for which the density bonus is granted.
19.35.070 Approval. Prior to the issuance of any permit(s), the City shall review and approve the
location and unit mix of the affordable housing units consistent with the following standards:
A. If the affordable housing development has both affordable and market rate units, the
affordable units shall be floating units. A "Floating" designation provides the flexibility to maintain a
certain number of affordable units throughout the required period, allowing the specific units to vary
with availability. The floating units ensure that affordable units are indistinguishable from and
interchangeable with market-rate units;
B. The design and appearance of affordable housing units shall be compatible with the total
housing development and be consistent with design criteria outlined in SVMC 19.35.050(D);
C. Affordable housing units shall have an equivalent bedroom mix consistent with the total
housing development; except that the developer may include a higher proportion of affordable
housing units with more bedrooms;
19.35.080 Affordability agreement. Prior to issuing a certificate of occupancy, an agreement in
a form acceptable to the City that insures compliance with the provisions of 19.35 of this code shall be
2 of 3
recorded with Spokane County Auditor's Office. This agreement shall be a covenant running with the
land and shall be binding on the assigns, heirs, and successors of the applicant.
Affordable housing units that are provided under this section shall remain as affordable for the life of
the project for rental affordable housing units.
New Definitions (Appendix A):
Affordable Housing: Where the term affordable is used, it refers to the federal definition of
affordability stating that annual housing costs shall not exceed one third of a family's annual income.
When establishing affordability standards for moderate to extremely low-income families and
individuals the median household income is the amount calculated and published by the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development each year for Spokane County.
Recreational Facility, Indoor: A place designed and equipped for the conduct of sports and leisure-
time activities within an enclosed space. Examples include gymnasiums, amusement arcades, health
and fitness clubs, indoor tennis and racquetball courts, bowling alleys, and indoor swimming pools.
This definition excludes indoor sports arenas, auditoriums, and exhibition halls.
3 of 3
.1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Spokane PLANNING DIVISION
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 Fax: 509.921.1008 cityhall@spokanevalley.org
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
File Number: CTA-05-09
Description of proposal: A proposed text amendment providing density incentives for developments that include an
affordable housing component in the Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1) and the Multifamily High
Density Residential District(MF-2)
Proponent: Dwight J.Hume,9101 N.Mt.View Lane, Spokane,WA 99218
Location of proposal: N/A
Lead Agency: City of Spokane Valley Community Development Department,Planning Division
Determination: Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code,the lead agency
has determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The threshold determination is
available to the public upon request.
DNS issued under WAC 197-11-340(2)
Responsible Official: Staff Contact:
Kathy McClung, Community Development Director Mike Basinger,AICP—Senior Planner
City of Spokane Valley Community Development City of Spokane Valley Community Development
Department Department
Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite Valley Redwood Plaza, 11707 E. Sprague Avenue,.Suite
106, Spokane Valley,WA 99206 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206
PH: (509)688-0030/FX: (509)921-1008 PH: (509) 688-0045/FX: (509)921-1008
kmcclung@spokanevalley.org mbasinger@spokanevalley.org
Date issued: September 4,2009 Signature:
AkZettl-
ATPEAL: An appeal of this determination must be submitted to the ommunity Development Depaitment within fourteen -(14) calendar days after the date issued. The appeal must be written and make specific factual objections to the City's
threshold determination. Appeals shall be in conformance with Section 17.90 (Appeals) of the Spokane Valley Municipal,
Code. At the time of appeal submittal, required fees are due pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule. Pursuant to.
WAC 197-11-680,appeals shall be limited to a review of a final threshold determination.
Page 1 of 1
Mike Basinger
From: Edie Streicher[estreicher@shba.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:02 PM
To: Mike Basinger
Subject: Multifamily Density Zoning Changes
Hi Mike,
•
I was unaware there were changes to the multifamily zoning code being considered until I received the
press release on Monday evening. I have a few questions.
1. May I please get a copy of the proposed changes? I looked on the City's website and could not
find the document.
2. The last Planning Commission agenda included a reference to a zoning code amendment that
was not yet complete, but gave no specific information. Is this the amendment the agenda refers
to, or are there other changes being made that SHBA members should be aware of?
3. Have you been working with any specific developers on the proposed changes? If so, may I ask
who has been contacted?
4. Is there any particular reason why the SHBA was not made aware of the proposed changes? It
seems to me our Association should have been contacted early in the planning process since it is
our members who will be directly impacted.
5. Who proposed the changes?
6. When were the changes initially proposed?
7. Is there a project or specific reason why this is being rushed through the Planning Commission?
Was there truly a need to schedule a special workshop? I guess I just want to know what the
rush is.
8. When is the anticipated date for a City Council hearing?
I will be unable to attend the workshop this evening. I had already scheduled a meeting for the same time
when I received the notice.
Thank you,
Edie Streicher
Government Affairs Director
Spokane Home Builders Association
Office: 509.532.4990
Cell: 509.251.6136
10/1/2009
416 Northeast
Washington
Housing
ScIu ions Spokane Housing Authority DBA Northeast Washington Housing Solutions
55 W. Mission Ave. Spokane,WA 99201 Tel: 509-328-2953 Fax: 509-327-5246 TDD: 509-323-9502 www.spokanehousing.org
September 9, 2009
Ms. Kathy McClung
Community Development Director
City of Spokane Valley
1707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Re: Proposed Zoning Code Language revisions
Dear Ms. McClung:
Thank you for the opportunity to participate in the efforts of the City of Spokane Valley
to amend the language of your Zoning Code, in particular Chapter 19.35 dealing with
residential density bonuses. Economic development benefits greatly from the creation of
an inventory of affordable Workforce housing.
Spokane Housing Authority dba Northeast Washington Housing Solutions (NEWHS) is
supportive of this and any other efforts to enhance the development of affordable housing
for all income levels. We believe that for-profit developers will have an incentive to
provide housing for a wider range of family incomes if they are offered density bonuses.
We also believe such bonuses will make housing developments specifically designed to
serve lower income families more feasible with the added density.
Art Noll, Development Director of NEWHS, shall continue to be available to you and
your staff if you require any further input.
Respectfully,
-- A Llef--
./ Steve A. Cervantes
Executive Director
(
Cc: Art Noll
Mike Basinger
CtEQUAL HOUSING OPPORTUNITY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
Spcmolia STAFF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO THE
do,Valley PLANNING COMMISSION
CTA-05-09 AFFORDABLE HOUSING REGULATION
STAFF REPORT DATE: October 2,2009
HEARING DATE AND LOCATION: October 8, 2009, beginning at 6:00 p.m., Spokane Valley City Hall Council
Chambers, Valley Redwood Plaza Building, 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 101, Spokane Valley, Washington
99206.
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: A privately initiated text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC)
providing density incentives for developments that include an affordable housing component (workforce housing) in the
Multifamily Medium Density Residential District (MF-1) and the Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2),
Corridor Mixed Use(CMU), Mixed Use(MU), Mixed Use Avenue(MUA), City Center(CC) and Community Boulevard
(CB)zoning districts.
This proposal is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.21C.
PROPOSAL LOCATION: The proposal affects the entire City of Spokane Valley, Washington.
APPLICANT: Dwight J.Hume, 9101 N Mt.View Lane, Spokane,WA 99218
APPROVAL CRITERIA: Title 17 (General Provisions) and Title 21 (Environmental Controls) of the Spokane Valley
Municipal Code(SVMC).
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Division recommends that the Planning Commission approve the
proposed text amendment to the SVMC.
STAFF PLANNER: Mike Basinger,MCP, Senior Planner, Community Development Department
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Draft affordable housing regulation
Exhibit 2: SEPA Determination
Exhibit 3: Agency Comments
Exhibit 4: Public Comments
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
A. APPLICATION PROCESSING
Chapter 17.80 Permit Processing Procedures in the SVMC. The following summarizes key application procedures
for the proposal.
Application Submitted: July 23,2009
Determination of Completeness: August 6,2009
Issuance of an Optional Determination of Non-Significance(DNS): September 4, 2009
End of Appeal Period for DNS: September 18,2009
Date of Published Notice of Public Hearing: September 18,2009
Date of Mailed Notice of Public Hearing: September 18,2009
Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission
Page 1 of 4
B. SUMMARY OF TEXT AMENDMENTS
H. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO SEPA
Findings:
Pursuant to Title 21 (Environmental Controls)of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC),the lead agency has
determined that this proposal does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An
Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). The Planning Division issued
a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) for the proposal. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency.
Conclusion(s):
The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and Title 21 of the SVMC have been fulfilled by
the applicant's submittal of the required SEPA Checklist, and the issuance of the City's threshold determination
consisting of a Determination of Non-Significance(DNS). No appeals were received.
III.FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS SPECIFIC TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
A. COMPLIANCE WITH TITLE 17(GENERAL PROVISIONS)OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE
Findings:
Section 17.80.150(F) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) provides approval criteria that must be
considered when the City amends the SVMC. The criteria are listed below along with staff comments.
1. The proposed privately initiated text amendment is consistent with the applicable provisions of the
Comprehensive Plan;
Staff Response: The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) requires the City of Spokane
Valley to develop a housing chapter. The housing chapter provides the policy framework to ensure that
adequate, decent, and affordable housing is available to all income levels as communities grow. Under
GMA, the term affordable housing applies to housing for all economic levels. The Countywide Planning
Policies (CWPP) focus on mechanism to increase the availability of affordable housing for middle and
lower income households located within the County. The adopted CWPP stipulate that each jurisdiction
develop policies, regulations, and standards that provide the opportunity to create affordable housing in its
community. The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and
adopted CWPP. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the GMA, CWPPs, and the City of
Spokane Valley's Comprehensive Plan. The proposed text amendment develops implementing regulations
and standards that promote affordable housing consistent with the City Comprehensive Plan, specifically
policy HP-1.3 where development regulations may include bonus incentives in conjunction for providing a
greater diversity of housing types. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the City's adopted
Comprehensive Plan.
2. The proposed amendment bears a substantial relation to public health, safety,welfare, and protection of the
environment;
Staff Response: The proposed amendment will provide new multifamily housing projects with an
affordable housing component to provide for work force housing. The work force housing component will
reassure residents that they will be able to afford to live close to their jobs, friends, and families. It will
also help preserve and maintain neighborhoods that include a healthy mix of ages and incomes. The public
Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission
Page 2 of 4
health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furthered by ensuring the Spokane Valley
Municipal Code(SVMC) is reflective of regional policy and implements internal plans.
Conclusion(s):
The proposed privately initiated text amendment to the SVMC is consistent with the approval criteria contained in the
SVMC.
IV. STAFF RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Division after review and consideration of the proposed privately initiated text amendment and
applicable approval criteria recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of CTA-05-09.
V. PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS
The Planning Commission is required to adopt findings of fact(Sections 17.80.140 & 17.80.150)when recommending
changes to the SVMC. At the conclusion of the hearing for the text amendment to the SVMC,the Planning
Commission,by separate motion, should adopt findings of fact.
Background: In 2006,the City of Spokane Valley adopted their first Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan
includes several policies and goals regarding affordable housing. Policy HP-1.3 of the Comprehensive Plan calls for
development regulations and incentives that encourage greater diversity of housing types, costs, and designs that may
include bonus incentives, clustering, and transfer development rights.
The intent of the proposed text amendment is to develop regulations that promote affordable housing in the Multifamily
Medium Density Residential District(MF-1)and the Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2),Corridor
Mixed Use(CMU),Mixed Use(MU),Mixed Use Avenue(MUA),City Center(CC)and Community Boulevard(CB)
zoning classifications by allowing density bonuses in exchange for the inclusion of affordable housing units within the
development. Staff has developed a recommended regulation in cooperation with Northeast Washington Housing
Solutions, and the applicant's representatives to provide density incentives to encourage affordable housing(workforce
housing)and criteria to ensure the project is well designed and has additional amenities that contribute to the quality of
life for the residents.
Findings: Staff has prepared the following findings for the Planning Commission in the event there is concurrence
with the recommended approval.
Section 17.80.150(F) of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code(SVMC)provides approval criteria that must be
considered when the City amends the SVMC.
Planning Commission Findings:
1. The Planning Commission finds the proposed privately initiated text amendment to be consistent with
the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Act, Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) and
the City's Comprehensive Plan;
GMA Policies
a. The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA)1 provides the following guidance applicable
to housing and neighborhoods:
i. Encourage the availability of affordable housing to all economic segments of the population of
this state, promote a variety of residential densities and housing types, and encourage
preservation of existing housing stock
ii. Identification of sufficient land area for the number of needed housing units, including
government assisted housing, housing for low income families, mobile/manufactured housing,
multiple family housing, and special needs housing
Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission
Page 3 of 4
Countywide Planning Policies
b. The Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP) focus on mechanism to increase the availability of
affordable housing for middle and lower income households located within the County
i. Each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan shall specify the strategies for attaining its affordable
housing objectives. These strategies should include a diverse mix of housing types and prices,
including low-income housing
ii. Each jurisdiction's development policies, regulations, and standards should provide for the
opportunity to create affordable housing in its community. Such policies may include
regulatory tools, such as inclusionary zoning, performance/impact zoning, mixed-use
development, and incentives for increasing density to promote greater choice and affordable
housing.
City of Spokane Valley Goals and Policies
c. The City of Spokane Valley has adopted goals and policies consistent with the GMA and adopted
CWPP.
i. HP-1.3 Establish development regulations and incentives for greater diversity of housing types,
costs, and designs that may include bonus incentives, clustering, and transfer of development
rights.
ii. Goal HG-1 Encourage diversity in design to meet the housing needs of the residents of the
community and region.
iii. Goal HG-2 Encourage the use of affordable housing initiatives of regional organizations with a
record of providing safe and affordable housing.
2. The Planning Commission finds the proposed privately initiated text amendment to bear a substantial
relation to public health,safety, welfare, and protection of the environment;
Supporting Statements
a. The proposed privately initiated text amendment will provide new multifamily housing projects with
an affordable housing component to provide for work force housing. The work force housing
component will reassure residents that they will be able to afford to live close to their jobs, friends,
and families.
b. It will also help preserve and maintain neighborhoods that include a healthy mix of ages and incomes.
The public health, safety, welfare, and protection of the environment is furthered by ensuring the
Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC) is reflective of regional policy and implements internal
plans.
Recommended Motion: The Planning Commission adopts the findings in the staff report and recommends approval
of CTA-05-09, a text amendment to the Spokane Valley Municipal Code, establishing Chapter 19.35, providing
density incentives for affordable housing in multifamily zones.
Staff Report and Recommendation to the Planning Commission
Page 4 of 4
Deanna Griffith
From: Margaret Mortz [mmortz@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 2:49 PM
To: Deanna Griffith
Cc: Mortz
Subject: Re: SV Planning Commission Meeting 10-8-09
Follow Up Flag: Follow up
Flag Status: Flagged
To the Planning Commission:
Please do not prohibit manufactured accessory dwellings. You would block the appropriate use of the HUD
ECHO program. Appropriately designed portable manufactured housing should be considered a valid
accessory dwelling. A blanket prohibition would prevent a valid method for providing in-home elder care and
affordable housing for disabled people.
•
HUD has a program called Elder Cottage Housing Opportunities (ECHO)
"Elder Cottage Housing Opportunities (I CHO) are a specific model of accessory housing. A typical ECHO
unit is a small manufactured home or cottage located on the property of a single family home that is owned by
the older adult's children. "
http://cpfoa-stare.musk.usm.maine.edu/resources/levelthree.aspx?sectionGUID=813488a4-d43c-41'24-bd2d-
45e73ab17c5c
HUD HOME funds can be used for ECHO housing.
" 92.258 Elder cottage housing opportunity (ECHO) units.
(a) General. HOME funds may be used for the initial purchase and initial placement costs of elder cottage
housing opportunity (ECHO) units that meet the requirements of this section, and that are small, free-standing,
barrier-free, energy-efficient, removable, and designed to be installed adjacent to existing single-family
dwellings."
http://ecfr.gpoaccess.uov/cgi/t/text/text-
idx?c=ecfr&sid=ae9e 1 b2353bc7a6eh 30cbd40179718c7&rgn=div6&view=text&node=24:1.1.1.1.42.6&idno=2
4
AARP endorses the ECHO Cottages
http://vv vv yv.aarp.ori/familv/housinu/articles/stavcloser.html
"ECHO is an ideal answer for many families. It allows older adults to get the support they need while all can
stay independent in their own homes. It gives everyone the privacy they may desire. And the bonus? Because
the ECHO unit is temporary, it can be removed when it is no longer needed.
I propose that the commission does not prohibit manufactured accessory dwelling, but instead put in a statement
that manufactured portable accessory dwellings should meet the standards of the HUD ECHO program.
If you desire, I can provide more references and/or prepare a white paper. In the meantime, please do not block
the ECHO program.
1
Sincerely,
Margaret Mortz
3420 S. Ridgeview Dr.
Spokane Valley WA 99026
n7117ortz Ci gmai!.com
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Deanna Griffith<dgriffithk-tspokanevallev.org>wrote:
You may send me your comments and I will make sure they are submitted as part of the record.
dg
From: Margaret Mortz[mailto:mmortz(c) mail.com]
Sent: Tuesday,October 06,2009 1:55 PM
To: Deanna Griffith
Subject: Re: SV Planning Commission Meeting 10-8-09
May I comment by email, or do I have to attend the meeting?
Margaret
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 1:53 PM, Deanna Griffith<dariffith@spokanevalley.org>wrote:
The City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission will be holding its regular meeting on this Thursday 10-8-
09. On the agenda for this week's meeting are two public hearings and a request for recommendation.
The first public hearing is regarding a batch of code amendments regarding title 19, Chapter 19.40.010 — State
that cargo shipping containers and similar enclosures are not a permitted accessory structure in any residential
zone. Chapter 19.20.06 - State that additions to nonconforming structures must meet current zoning setbacks.
Chapter 19.40.100 — Remove language to clarify the size limits of Accessory Dwelling Units; add that a
manufactured home cannot be an Accessory Dwelling Unit. Chapter 19.40.140 - State that a Home Occupation
permit is required for any business person or entity engaging in a for-profit enterprise in a residence. Add and
clarify examples of not allowed businesses including adding "small engine repair" to the list of definitions.
Chapter 19.50— .050(G)2 Add the requirement that buildings must meet applicable building code requirements;
.060(C)3 Active recreation areas are Community Development Director determined. Chapter 19.120 -Add Self
Storage/mini storage to permitted uses in both the I-1 and I-2 zones. Planner Tavis Schmidt is taking the lead
on these amendments, tschmidt(i)spokanevalley.org
2
The second public hearing is regarding an amendment for A privately initiated text amendment to the SVMC
providing density incentives for developments that include an affordable housing component in the Multifamily Medium
Density Residential District(MF-l)and the Multifamily High Density Residential District(MF-2), Corridor Mixed Use
(CMU), Mixed Use(MU), Mixed Use Avenue(MUA), City Center(CC) and Community Boulevard (CB)district zones.
Mike Basinger is the lead on this project mbasinger'aspokanevallev.or9
Thirdly staff is asking the Planning Commission to review and recommend to Council the proposed Public Participation
Plan for the Shoreline Master Program update. If you have specific questions please contact lead planner Lori Barlow at
Ibarlo\\ <<spokanevallev.org
I am working to get these documents posted to the web as fast as I can, however if you are in need of anything in
particular, please do not hesitate to let me know right away and I will email to you the documents you are looking for.
Sincerely,
(Deanna Griffith
Admin Assist, Community Development
City of Spokane Valley
11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
509-688-0050, direct
509-921-1008, fax
dgriffithk spokanevallev.org
3
Splkan� Department of Community Development
j\alr� y Planning Division
CTA-05-09
Amendment to the SVMC
October 8, 2009
Mike Basinger,Senior Planner
October I.2009 CTA-05-09
Department of Community Development
SO:Wane
}j11 Planning Division
Privately Initiated Text Amendment
Density Incentives for affordable housing
Presentation Outline
— Regional Affordability
— Income limits
— Policy framework
— Where the regulation will apply in COSV
— Density calculations
— Development standards
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
I
Valle
Department of Community Development
�'jaik
Planning Division
Collaborative Effort
• Initiated July 2009
• Regulation development
— Housing Authority
— Applicant
— COSV
® Incentive based regulation (voluntary)
— Work force housing
• 40% - 60% of Area Median Income (AMI)
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
�\-- Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Regional Efforts
Mayor Munson, Mayor Verner, & Commissioner Mager
• — Organized a 20 member task force
• Task Force
— Indentified a shortage of affordable housing
— Developed implementation strategies:
• jurisdictions develop and adopt incentives
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
2
spioknn/�e Department of Community Development
jVt11le'. Planning Division
2008 Income Limits
FY 2008 Median FY 2008 Income Limit 1 Person 2 Person 3 Person 4 Person
Income Income Category
Limit Area
Spokane, $56,700 Extremely Low(30%) $12,100 $13,850 $15,550 $17,300
WA MSA Income Limits
Very Low(50%)Income $20,150 $23,050 $25,900 $28,800
Limits
Low(80%) $32,250 $36,900 $41,500 $46,100
Income Limits
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
ISookan�' Department of Community Development
.....0 Valitaisii, Planning Division
Affordable Housing Policy Framework
• GMA
— Requires a housing element in Comp Plan 0
— Encourage variety of housing options El
— Allow smaller lots 0
— Provide density bonuses for affordable housing
— Encourage infill development E1
— Allow for MU development 0
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
3
Spiil:��nne Department of Community Development
j�alk Planning Division
COSV Comp Plan
HP-1 .3 Establish development regulations and
incentives for greater diversity of housing
types, costs and designs, that may include
bonus incentives, clustering, and transfer of
development rights
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
.�� Department of Community Development
Spokane
Planning Division
Applicability
J
Mixed use zones
r.- st L._ Multifamily zones
Subarea zones MF
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
4
soar Department of Community Development
fJeomiew Planning Division
Bonus Density Calculations
% of Median ($56,700 AMI) Bonus Density (MF-2)
40% ($22,680) 40% (30.8 units/acre)
$11 an hour 5 affordable units
50% ($28,350) 30% (28.6 units/acre)
$14 an hour 4 affordable units
60% ($34,020) 20% (26.4 units/acre)
$16 an hour (2 people min wage) 2 affordable units
Note:affordable housing units shall be floating(interchangeable)
30%and below is served by housing authority,non-profit housing
agencies&private Landlords
October 1,2009 CTA-05-09
sPo —. Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Additional Density Increase in Exchange for Amenities
• Benches and fountain—additional 5%
• Playground apparatus—additional 10%
• Sport Court—additional 10%
• Indoor Recreational Facility—additional 20%
• Other amenities approved by Director—not to exceed 10%
Note: overall density shall not exceed 60%
• MF -2 development
— 22 units with 60% increase=35.2 units
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
5
n \ Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Development Standards
• Additional 5% open space (total 15%)
• Make use of site characteristics
-- Trees. creeks, riparian zones. etc.
• Emphasize natural topography
• Requires design continuity
• Promotes a safe environment
Emphasizes pedestrian paths
• Exceptions
— 25% building height
— 10% of required yard
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
/• Department of Community Development i
_stiokane
Valley Planning Division
Summary
• Developers increase density of project
— Provides both market rate and affordable units
— Reduces per unit land costs
• Affordable housing @ no cost to City
— Increases real estate value of projects
— Work force housing opportunities attracts
businesses
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
6
Department of Community Development
jVaL _ Planning Division
Proposed Text Amendment
Chapter 19.35 Residential Density Bonus
— Applies to MF-1, MF-2, CMU, MU, MUA, CC, & CB
— Adds density calculations related to affordability
— Adds development standards: open space/design
• Appendix A Definitions
— Affordable Housing
— Recreational Facility, Indoor
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
. �� Department of Community Development
jV41i Planning Division
Decision Criteria
• Section 17.80.150(F) of SVMC
— The proposed text amendment is consistent with
the applicable provisions of the Comp Plan
— The proposed text amendment bears a substantial
relationship to the public health, safety, welfare,
and protection of the environment
October I,2009 CTA-06-09
7
Spo;V Department of Community Development
j �; Planning Division
PC Findings of Fact
Planning Commission Findings (page 3 & 4)
— Decision criteria (italicized)
— Recommended motion for PC consideration
— Planning Commission's Recommendation to City
Council
• adopt as proposed
• make modifications to proposal
• recommend the proposal not be adopted
• forward no recommendation
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
— n/e Department of Community Development
jVal ommoot Planning Division
Questions?
October I,2009 CTA-05-09
8
1111
Frameworks
AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOLUTIONS FOR THE NORTHWEST
The Face of ofAffordable Housing
What is Affordable Housing
• Housing developed for families not
typically served by regular real estate
markets
• For Home Ownership, this is families who
earn less than 80% of area median income
* � � f .
-11101 Ili .
.4
!:
• �• AIR
k.1111 I ' . 1
Which of these houses is "affordable"?
. ,
. .. . . . . . , ... .. . . .. .,.,
, ••,,
1 ,
•
. , .
- ---.,„.,-_, i.,„,:„.. .
.,...
, ..,.
f.C
- -
1.61 . . ..' . . •
ti '. . '''4‘:,i1;•Ok• -y.,-=.-..
•
l fl .L - :t2-; Sidi-t, -;Ij 11' _'J�` 11 - f• -- -:
O
y3/40 �1 ' R 'moi-:.-
• IF -. .• �,. •A it i •S s'1 i 1 6 i �+i st•1 ��i..+.:a.,, ...
<r
_ . l ; � «ter .i.---,.
(`. K V
4
4 .. � " •
'1a -
i' -.-..e. 4-..... or-Noo.,
• WiN. '' ' • lt •
.
St-
. ......-•
- •- .7;*
..e.:
.. . .. ••.,-
N ;„. • 4. -rec‘
milk .' • .F. Ii,•-v ....,:i
4. 4
r... As,
..„, . . , •
. . •
. ,
-'• • , . f i'.•
. .
. • •.
_ . • . •
- .
--- .
------. -
its* 1011410401..'•..4,-...-..-1,...-, ,;:;..',.....4...,-4...' ..-,,,x' . ,47 770 s.757,11::' It:‘•sis 4'...
——
- - .. ..,.._ .
,,,
..—
...... -- • -
, . - — 7-- ---.--_-_--- .._—_:.-----
.
,.-
1
,_ _ . _... • I . .... --------___-_---:-----:_...
,••t -7.— __----_-_,.:----- _I
___.‘ -----1 . -'. ---7-----_
—.-.----...—
.4,-, 1
• - - ,
• .,—
II ----, t , .• .„.......,
• .
____........ i 1
. .. ". ___,
_ A III -- •-, . . -,:* it.:i'•
.
I ; if' i, , i • : '. . 41 ‘i,,, 14 •4,Pi -: -•.1-1
' _ ,.1. ; , i,.• r.. 1,, - . , '4 , • , yr
--,..A.°D.:••••.! t.. • 4 '..--- —1_
. 4'0.1 ir: -ti
__ , 1 ',1 it 1 1 ki !2. ! ..• 1 ''''1 ' ''i;I ,
--,_______ .• MG;
. • --,
1111
...---
,_.___________..
ii .. .
i ---
----- _.,;,. ‘,..,...,........0. ,k".;',. . _7---1--•-•
1 -- .• .....1,...i''..,'; :-....-----1 •
--;
1 ; III - .------- .
, . ,., ;,
4ii t... r t.; ' - tl,. L , __
.
.;,....„Wigtitiit:';IN f-)-- P. I!s7
— •*****i I..: ••4 '•' 1.. ..ft.i too.y...4,o,...,.,,,,,
•.
1 ••• - :'. '-'7' • - • ' .*Yee..' s .•-4+4%)t 4` ' WIS.1.11'011.14$ ' ... • . ;
- r •
- ...... ......„..-r-e_.,r,..,* ..• •_.„.;# ...."- .... .-,,..,,,Nz...... , .
- - - -,2,:iamfirtsampai.,-.- • ,
.,, ••
. .
lr _ma.
. . .
. .
• _ .. ... . . _ , .. . -. _ - . •
,-•-. ..
4111111111h. - - -
. . .
. _,.
. ; ,V.AP'' "- ' •11011*16*
jaiL„
' What isA ffordable Housing
• 80% AMI in Spokane County in 2009
— Family of 2 S38,500
— Family of 3 S43,350
— Family of 4 S48, 150
Dishman Commons Neighborhood
- - - ------ - -
• 10.4 Acres
• City of Spokane Valley
• Mixed Income
• Developed in partnership with Greenstone
Homes, a large for profit developer
• 51 Single Family Homes plus 36
Condominiums
4001/1/1111
4
lit .-•
. -.
fri
' l
..,.
I 111P611111,1111111111111110. - . : : '..'7'41,. / •c.-'" .
• -** •1'1.4 r
.
• ' I. ...._
• •af ..------1--_J.:•-z-,-__ _------:-2-,- r-
'. -•.__ :7:---- :-----•,_•_• --__.
SC al,
•:— ,
.\,-._.__ --_-_7----------.-171-7-_-_-_-- -------.77:---- .
•., ___:::- ...,-.---__-- -7-..---- ,,,,,,,-- -.---
...2_ . ,. ....," ....,
....-
.'
-...- . '
. -
:,..11P • -
—,.___
--..-1 -
-— — — -
- _ ....
' % -.--___--_—
_____________
.__
..1 -ilK,:-, - • ..
. .
- ...--
.....-
.
._.,.. -
0 - ,,--- L
.. . ......--
":"4:-.-
1-. ,,-• ,".. 1 ---,..zr.:. -.-4. - 1 '.
,- r1/47-..-• -4 -P
tr. if .--:'''' • ' - .--. -----41......'1.1'11 40
.0,1'.Ot'. ':•... • - - • -
, ;a,.•. . :
! ,------ a
t :•P' . ---. ....„.
. 'r•- _, i ill!1
.----------A---___ , _ ,
.t., -..' • .41; ,•-• !
.- ---!
• '- '
. ..,,,, ii gr----- _______________________J
.,...4 ..",.. r".
I . -----1(0-
. .
.
... Ili I I
--- .,
.- ...
Iltr- Iii I II I'
,A.,f, 4.
if! 0''-''-' ---
,.. _
s,,-, • -%-.,••• .
;•_.. ,
-.-- ;.
. •• 3,i.:
. . ....-- ____.„.......••••"- r--
r --1
I "----- ----
. •.
.'. 4......." .---
- --1.
..-•
•i --- -.......->---
• ‘':.44 ', - iN'ii,.' , --
.14 ,•••••-",•;.VI:At;iiife.--'- .,;$'., ,, ,.<•••...,'•,"- „.•'.'
.,,:...,, ..„..„,,,,-.-- ,. 1-
. ., ,,,,,,v- . .f __.. .
-- ---.1
...„ -,. ..„. .4 •---
r___.---:---------___. ,..4.....,4,.ab,„ ... •,1-„, . .„ •
ir7.--= . i•
— __._• ----
f r
,. _______________.-- .•- -----
.
...- ..------
,
I . ___ _____________
ir. .__ ______ ____r- r ---
-..____—_-1
— .
d - r r --.__
_
. .
•
..z.."=
--..- .—.. ..
—____ ..,....
—
—
-----,
.. .,_
r
.7...,, *."..::,*
.• ,-:, "ts 1
•
. _.•
•
•
. .,
.... • • . -, 1...‘)
- .--`It!:.,• L.--- --
....... ..
---f- i'..,1,1?-1 .•
_ ...
'" , —
15 ,_.% ...
__.
.,.
-----
..-•----
- _
. .
-.:-
....-
-
s.
I
-----.... ,.
. .
. ..
• • - ...•
___---------___--------_,:••. --_____,,,_ • 1
.t. , . . '1,;=-•-- - f--,..1,,
1 ' , . ' -----•••••• ----
- . ...'. . .
. -; #r ''''4 ./... ••
, .aL 4.zw . •.t,
-__------------.__.____ ..:- _ - ' :•-g Aili •,-:,N r.,..t.,-••
• °
•.,• . Asiu;„„2.- .04
. -•- ""‘ --, .
.- • ..Willel,
.
. - ,
.
' • .43;* ....-.;4 ,
. ----...... -1
: —-----:-• . . ,.
.., : 7--------i -. -... ......._ _
• ;
1 , '.U., -• -, --of".-1 1
;:4 .1)1j,- '..,.i..,. -./.•'.. ...-.„
--... .
---- '
. ...,‘,....r , .,... --•-• , ,
.,, ',.s..i.i...-;„ ,. 411, •, ,.... .-__, mid — - i, ,
-,,,.. .y----, - - .. ,. t.,. ,., , ......, ,•,:.,:,
:•-•'--•• -') 11 ,..t 4.-,',.,•-• - !POO :----- 1p4 , s,.:..40,.% ..,. .-...„ ,... ,- •
-..x. -4.-.,s;-•%, ..•• .,• - ,
. •Ar;‘;,;.-.4 :..7.1.„,`,,. „,`, ------, ,,.r.' .,„.„ la .— --1 t,',..: , :...4. '''. ' . .... .•bliPP•-. - ' - ' '''
--.
•-..-__._.________________
--- I 1 i-..• ' ,,',.. .^..,44, '. ".,..,,-....c...
— , 1 , ...,.4.
--- "I • . it -1 `-•1: .... ' * '.
c .
. .
•71.",•••
. ..ru
•• - . '...,,• ' '.:- .1.,...j s -1 -. • ---- 1 1
ti -1 " • '
__________. ‘r".1-2.- •--- ':'` ;$1:..1....- '1-1.-.;I:k'.17.'• •' --: :. . _7:-__. -I. - -..:_! t" --t . ..e.•... %5k,r - •-.;
________ .„..--- -- ilit,ji..1;ic.:'.• - . ''-" . ' -‘7.1.4 • -•ik -
. . 5. • •:
-----------------, __L__- —___.2---- -•.. .4•?...,...;i, ,.... .,,_,_,. -.,--:----_, ---. ---7-. _„----„, -.1
_-_-----------------1
_ ________________.
________ ,,,...._-- , --1 * , • -
------- • ,... ........_ , "1 i -,
•
,. ,., , — __., . • '1 .
.,' 1"
---____— •_..-- ,. ‘., ______I "1 • ..—` ''
..24
11
4.• —_____ — -.I, — - --1
— - .; -IT, .i : -.:4!It 4 i ii4110., a
-- —•, q )1
,.. r-••. •r-4, ' . . — —I .-1 '1
--
•• • i..,...,_. -- --1
• #.-1,-_ex,-•,-, • .a , -- ..- e..
; i ........_
air'''. 4-'-'1-- .1-t•-";i '• •70119,46;:4VI il; •''''',,
- - - - d,AL-9.e -...*-WeTful-,-...,,t- 1 •
.- — --,
. .••-•-c .
.- -,•:- -.1m:
W. s' '•-.' ",••'• (,-;--:•: ..i•--. . — ---, .
.. ••
...,
All
-I- -
t.. ..- : ;•-•-7-. ''---.-:..2--416- • - -
-.....- ,. ,A, •;. .,,z.i.;.&-._ ..
.. . •. ..:. , •.
•
. ..
. .•.-
- ..
•.--,----...----•••.---------•-*-- - ....•• ..,...., • . -..- ,;•':•••• N-!',4f,-,-,-;;,....-:•,-:...-•
Who lives in Affordable Housing
• Tara
— Single Mom
— Full time student
— Part time waitress
— Earned her down payment with sweat equity
— Now has graduated and works as a nurse.
0
Who lives in Affordable Housing
• Ed & Jessie
— Family of 5
— Husband is in military
— Wife works part time
— Earned their down payment with sweat equity
— Jessie now actively involved in the community.
.�
w
.
• C
1 •• 4 r i+ i ' i.1
+ 4. •'. : V °I.''
• s
i • t' r , .- y i
...., . • ..- ' V xo•-•. • . i . .-_____..X.0 :wimp/a"' *i , r!' .i. 100k
11114 .
tit ,,, 09 AL 006,44 MIP, .,
.-++rte.^r
al....
`_...�
•
... FJ ti��. '0'.4k. %.. qir _ s'»� h r
t f. :
..
. r .
.. .' '''''';: i..•,':',' rix( :'y \. . ..
M'.
•
ir7r , . . ,.
., .. ,..,.. ..
• . ..
, .. ... ,
.. .
t
4,0040L
•
•
•moi 0 1 . -- - � .<
. ,....� AS--i I. r.:.. - • ''''s V . .:... . .
-.� x =,••••-•-
nr
.44..ittow - '
,. '. ..rti, , jLis.- :‘,..v.:, _ - IN Atiy2,b,lit_,^ -..., s------ mmummizt itaillillE*44,.., I
\\F:i ,V, - • . -.4%Ni, ik- I '.. . -
.. ,,,,F...:F!... "...4,:.. , 4,,,,Ziattp,' , ;-.4. „, , ,
iiri, . ,.., it.4. t. . i ,.i. . , .v.,• • _._ 0 .• , ,
,. ,
•
` r' �,r , _, ter._i..s 4 {�• : , i` :f`, 4 4 7 r `,,
7RR� t !' ...,.1, r.
s
_9.
,-; li
a '-
' k e x.
^ r
ti •.s
S
T
— .....,,,,„„,,__-•
Affordable Senior Housing
____......,,,,
__,,,___________
___________
___ \ .
, .., ,,,,---______ r .__,--- , ,,,,,, , ______ ____-- i isF. qi-,I '1 h .I ' ii it 'ii i ' � �� 11., lair_7______
- -_.._.t - _
;y.1 - ��d q 9 1 11 i� , 'i�e7; ;4 '\ . Ili
i .-"'''''.---444
�_. ‘ 1�et
II i•1r, � � rye �i'II ��� y,, la 2 �� _. -- it '
-` ! � ��� N� , �' 16. _ � - - � 1 � �..±. ..� �r� 1 IIS -,
— — ___ caws i. :' I ' -fir; 1 'i1'. .L
-( ___ ��� jj{ 1
s
Homes
Polnte Town
Valley
: , ,.,.:
....,
. .‘,...
- � riLii' ,iifilikiip [. 1-
•U/+S`-r — Y 4ii I:�'` -� I' ..:„.,.-,,,
^I�� ,LO - —_ ma '-•y^.., - .
t 4,4=i. v`.r tae
L1�
.,.....:--,w.11_
.. ___:, 1 _ , _____„
_ ,
1 lir! ,
.r
, ,.
, _.....,...... iz...., , ,
.e.-vs....., ..... =____, . _I, _.—_, -
'- .0 .------Trt:i,z.',1:_-1;_-. 1 rj1:41,.:''7-T.;1___----____--- 1: _________ 1:,.., id ,,f;, „,_ .,,_ , .
1..,A.,„ ..tk....:., ,________, -.,, _.....,
,,,, . ,_ ,$, —
.1.3 .::
,. _
1 vo.,• .,_
,, ,,,,.x.,.,„ .." _... -1-------- ,=..• i'..- --------- i "r"1.1,!.4,. r,-5.---
,---- .. _ ..- ..
,'-'..',...;',,,.....f'—'-';',
citr
1 -',,,-. .f.:;,:1.7,., F' y'r / , ' • . ' . r � :c .•
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: October 8, 2009 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing
❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Participation Plan for the 2009-2010 Shoreline Master Program Update
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70A.140; RCW 90.58.130; WAC 173-26-201; WAC 173-26-100; and
WAC 365-195-600.
PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: Following incorporation the City of Spokane Valley adopted the Spokane County Shoreline
Master Program (SMP) as the interim SMP for the City. The County's SMP was adopted in 1975. The SMP
must be updated by December 1, 2013 to be consistent with the Department of Ecology (DOE) Shoreline
Management Program Guidelines. This will involve a participation process with the public, local and state
agencies and affected tribes; an inventory of shoreline conditions, analysis of shoreline conditions; assigning or
revising proposed environment designations; development of shoreline goals, policies and regulations for the
SMP, and final review and adoption. The City has budgeted $150,000 to complete the process.
At this time, URS Corporation has been selected from a pool of consultants to assist the city with the update,
and a dynamic work program has been developed. Staff has prepared a public participation plan that identifies
opportunities for public input throughout the 2009-2010 update process in coordination with the work program.
The plan was developed to meet the requirements of all governing legislation by providing early and
continuous public participation opportunities that include open houses, public meetings, agency review,
committee review of the goals and policies, and continuous access to information via an Internet web page.
Staff has begun work on the update, but is requesting that the Public Participation Plan for the 2009-2010
Shoreline Master Program Update be reviewed by the Planning Commission and that a formal
recommendation be made to the Council to accept the Plan by resolution.
OPTIONS: Recommend the council accept the plan, modify the plan, or deny the plan.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the plan
STAFF CONTACT: Lori Barlow, Associate Planner
ATTACHMENTS:
Exhibit 1: Public Involvement Plan
Exhibit 2: SMP Project Timeline
Spokane Valley Shoreline Master Program and Development
Regulations Update
Public Involvement Plan
Project
Update the Shoreline Master Program and Development Regulations consistent with the
DOE Guidelines. The update process includes completion of inventory and analysis
reports with corresponding maps and illustrations that characterize shoreline ecological
conditions; development of shoreline policies, environment designations, and use
regulations; as well as analysis of cumulative impacts and uses, and preparation of a
shoreline restoration plan.
Applicable Rules and Regulations
The following regulations apply to this project:
1. WAC 173-26-201 Comprehensive process to prepare or amend shoreline
master programs
2. WAC 173-26-100 Local process for approving/amending shoreline master
programs
3. RCW 36.70A.140 Comprehensive Plans—Ensure public participation
4. RCW 90.58.130 Involvement of all persons having an interest,means
5. WAC 365-195-600 Public Participation.
Public Involvement Plan Overview
The public involvement plan is based on the following requirements or points:
1. Create opportunities for early and continuous involvement of all interested
parties that include, shoreline property owners, state agencies, Tribes, local
residents,neighboring jurisdictions, elected officials, recreational users,
conservation groups, etc.
2. Include opportunities to identify shoreline management issues of local
concern early in the process;
3. Inform the public of the process, opportunities to participate, decisions made,
and next steps by utilizing various media methods.
The plan includes the use of a Shoreline Advisory Committee and the identification of a
Technical Advisory Group, community meetings, Planning Commission and Council
workshops, meetings and briefings, creation of a shoreline page on the City's website,
and mailings. The specific elements of the plan include:
Page 1 October 1,2009
SMP and Development Regulations Update
Public Involvement Plan
Citizens Advisory Committee and Technical Review Group
A Technical Review Group (TRG)will consist of representatives from local, regional,
state, and tribal agencies. The City is required to seek input,participation and
recommendations from these groups. Completed phases of the update will be provided to
the group for review and comment to share information, encourage cooperation and
promote intergovernmental activity associated with the SMP update. A list of TRG
members will be developed for distribution of materials.
A Shoreline Advisory Committee (SAC) will be established to provide feedback and
communication primarily during the development of goals,policies and supporting
development regulations. However,the committee may be used throughout the process.
The SAC will consist of property owners, interested neighborhood groups, recreational
users, interested individuals and organizations with technical expertise. A limited number
of government and agency representatives may be involved at this level. The Committee
will review and discuss the findings and or recommendations associated with the phases
listed below.
Key points for discussion with committees are:
1. Shoreline inventory, characterization, and analysis
a. Present report and request feedback and issue identification
2. Shoreline environment designation
a. Introduce designations and rationale—request input
3. Shoreline policy and regulation development
a. Ongoing meetings to review the draft policy and regulation language
4. Cumulative impacts analysis and restoration planning
a. Present reports and request input
Open Houses/Community Meetings
This format will be used to educate the public on the Shoreline Master Program and gain
input from the public on issues or alternatives. Open Houses will be scheduled at the
conclusion of the following tasks or other significant timeline events.
1 Shoreline inventory, characterization and analysis report
2 Development of the environment designations
3 Draft Shoreline policy and regulations
4 Draft cumulative impacts analysis and restoration plan
5 Final Draft Plan and Development Regulations
City of Spokane Valley Web page
Staff will create and maintain a web page. The web page will be used to issue press
releases, SMP updates, and notices for public meeting. Content updates will occur as new
information is available. The web page will also be used to distribute information and
provide opportunity for public comment. Materials on the site will include fact sheets,
Page 2 October 1,2009
SMP and Development Regulations Update
Public Involvement Plan
reports, maps, as they become available,meeting notices, agendas, and summaries, and
staff contact information.
Informational Mailings
Mailings will be sent to all the property owners within the shoreline jurisdictional area
that describe the SMP update process, introduce the City of Spokane Valley web page
where information can be consistently found regarding shoreline update process, and
identify key staff for contact information. Property owners will be encouraged to provide
their email addresses for the email distribution list. Additional mailings may be
completed for open houses and public hearings to insure opportunity for feed back.
E-mail Notification and Mailing Lists
Staff will maintain an E-mail distribution list and a mailing distribution list for notices of
scheduled public meetings. Notice will be provided by mail and/or email. Individuals
and Organizations interested in being on the mailing list will be provided opportunity to
add their names to the list at public meetings, on the shoreline website, or by contacting
staff directly. Staff will distribute updates, notices for open houses, and notices for
Planning Commission and Council meetings.
Press Releases
Press Releases will be prepared and published area wide prior to each open house.
Planning Commission Updates/Public Hearings
Staff will provide monthly updates to the Commission on process and progress. Study
sessions will be scheduled at the conclusion of major tasks or other significant timeline
events. Tasks and information to be reviewed will be the same as the Committee work
program. The Commission will conduct a public hearing and provide a recommendation
to the council to accept each completed phase of the SMP update by resolution.
Additional Study Sessions/workshops will be held prior to public hearings for final
review by Commission. The Commission will hold a minimum of one public hearing
and forward its final recommendations and findings to the City Council for further action.
Joint Plan Commission and Council Review Meetings
Joint work sessions may be held between the Planning Commission and Council to
review preliminary Shoreline Master Program Information at the conclusion of major
tasks. Joint sessions will be scheduled at the discretion of staff if it is determined to be a
more efficient means to review information.
Page 3 October 1, 2009
SMP and Development Regulations Update
Public Involvement Plan
Council Updates/Public Hearings
Staff will provide quarterly updates to council. As major components of the SMP are
completed Council will be asked to accept them individually by resolution(or other
mechanism) including the public participation plan, inventory and analysis,
environmental designations, goals and policies, and regulations. Study sessions will be
conducted prior to a request for action on each component. Study Sessions will be
conducted prior to any public hearings conducted for final adoption of the plan.
Additional Public Meetings
Staff may elect to hold additional meetings if it is determined that more meetings are
needed to provide project information and/or provide additional opportunities for
gathering public comments and public participation.
Written comments
Written comments will be considered throughout the SMP update. During formal
comment periods, written comments must be received by the end of the public comment
period (to be determined). All written comments should be sent to the address below or
may be submitted through the Shorelines Master Program Update web page.
City of Spokane Valley
Community Development Department
11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Fax 509-921-1008
Staff
Staff will be available to answer questions and provide information regarding the
Shorelines Master Program update. The following individuals may be contacted for
shoreline update information:
Greg McCormick, AICP, Planning Manager, Project Lead (509)688-0023
Lori Barlow, Associate Planner, 509-688-0262
Micki Harnois, Associate Planner, 509-688-0048
Page 4 October 1, 2009
III� Department of Community Development
r, .....sVa Planning Division
Shoreline Master Program Update
Public Participation Plan
Planning, Commission Meeting,
October 8, 2009
.-°''� Department of Community Development
I..tnc
j�a►le Planning Division
SMP Update Process
Conduct inventory
!.:,:...;:..;::_:._:*___.i._00,
nd A..o.os
rDevelop Shoreline Address Develop
ronrnetDgnasr:1rnu .trnpacts Restoratwn Plan ...
ReviseRevise
Goals and Policies ll . .Deve(opmenE RegulabonS
I
Local Adoption
State Adoption
1
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Local Adoption Process
• Develop a Public Involvement Plan
— Involve all Interested Parties
— Coordinate with Local, State,and Federal Agencies and Local Tribes
• Develop the Plan—Address all State-Mandated Tasks
• Provide 60-day notice to Ecology and CTED
• SEPA (Environmental Review)
• Public Hearings—City required to conduct only 1
• Adoption by Council
• Forward to Ecology for State Adoption
• Anticipated Time Frame: 18 months
Spokar. Department of Community Development - r
Planning Division
State (Ecology) Adoption Process
• Ecology Reviews the plan for completeness
• Seeks Public comment/Public Hearing (30 days min.)
• Prepares a summary of public comments (15 days)
• Local government Responds to concerns —45 days
• Ecology prepares decision letter— 30 day max.
— Approves plan as-is
— Approves plan with changes
• City has 30 days to agree to change
• Submit an alternative proposal
• State process takes 3-6 months
2
P Department of CommunityDevelopment
Sikikanc P
j�ailcu Planning Division
RCW 90.58. 130 Involvement of all
persons and entities having interest
(i)Participation requirements.Local government shall comply with the provisions of RCW 90.58 130 which states:
"To insure that all persons and entities having an interest in the guidelines and master programs developed under this
chapter are provided with a fill opportuni0•for involvement in both their development and implementation,the
department and local governments shall:
(I)Make reasonable effa sill inform the people oft!e state ab ut the shoreline management program of this
chapter a ' • Ilse but
ctively encourage participation b all i ersons and u rivate?roups and entitis'rmring an
intere.mi._:.. _-.._,,,.,, ,. ien programs o I vis c •pier:at
7 Invite and encourage participation by all agencies of federal,state,and local government
inc a•- - he cor •rations,baring interests or responsibilities relatin_ra t h L. tare
and local agencies are directe ro participate u y m insure m err m crests are y considered by the department and
local governments."
Additionally,the provisions of\VAC 173-26-100 apply and include provisions to assure proper public participation and,
for local governments planning under the Growth Management Act,the provisions of RCW 36.70A-140 also apply.
At a minimum,all local governments shall be prepared to describe and document their methods to ensure that all
interested parties have a meaningful opportunity to participate.
(ii Communication with state agencies.B•fore undertaking substantial work,local governments shall
notify app •., •._ • ' •••-••• - • - ,relevant regional and statewide efforts,available information,and
methods for coordination and input.Contact the department for a list of applicable agencies to be notified.
(iii ommunication with affected Indian tribes Prior to undertaking substantial work,local
governmen . - . interests,relevant tribal efforts,available information and
methods for coordination and input.Contact the individual tribes or coordinating bodies such as the Northwest Indian
Fisheries Commission,for a list of affected Indian tribes to be notified.
Department of Community Development •,
Sniikane
j�alk Planning Division .
��
Open
House/
Community
PC/CC Updates Meetings
And Technical
Public Hearings Review Group
Public
Participation
Program Shoreline
Informational 1 Advisory
Mailings Elements Committee
(SAC)
Press Web Page
Releases
3
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Technical Review Group
• City is required to seek
Ecology
input and participation
Dept.of Fish
from the groups that Tribes And Wildlife
represent interests of the
Technical
state Review
Environmental Group Local Govt.
• Role: Perform technical Groups
review and comment on
Dept of
phases of the update Regional
Govt.Groups Natural
Resources
Department of Community Development Sliolcane
jam! , Planning Division
Open House/Community Meetings
• Educate the Public
• Gain input on issues and alternatives
• 6 OH Scheduled beginning Nov. 5, 2009
— Shoreline Inventory, Characterization and analysis report
— Development of Environment Designations
— Draft Shoreline policies and regulations
— Draft cumulative impacts analysis and restoration plan
— Final Draft Plan and Development Regulations
4
n Department of Community Development
jVa Planning Division
Shoreline Advisory Committee (SAC)
Neighborhood
• Role : Review and discuss Groups
findings/recommendations Local Govt. Property
Tribes Owners
associated with significant
phases
SAC
• Provide feedback and Environmental City Staff
Groups
communication primarily
during the development of Business Recreational
goals and policies and Owners Users
supporting development
regulations
Department of Community Development ,
Planning Division
Web Page
• Maintain a web page
— Issue press releases, SMP updates and notices
— Provide opportunity for comment
— Site will be updates as new info is available
— Materials on site will include:
• Fact sheets, reports, maps, meeting notices, agendas and
staff contact information
5
Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Informational Mailings
• 1st Mailing
— Sent to property owners within the shoreline jurisdiction
area
— Describe update process, introduce the web page, identify
key staff and advertise open house
• Last Mailing
— Notify public of final open house/public hearing on SMP
and development regulations
• Additional mailings may be utilized throughout
process as determined appropriate
siH- Department of Community Development
Planning Division
E-mail Notification and Mailing Lists
• Staff will maintain lists for
notices
• Notices will be provided by mail
or email
— Open houses, PC and CC meetings
• Persons may be added to the list
via the web page, by contacting
staff, or signing up at open
houses.
6
Spokan�~ Department of Community Development
jValIc}' Planning Division
Press Releases
• Published in area wide newspapers prior to
Open House
• Posted on City Website
Department of Community Development -
-....
Spokane 1e _ Planning Division .,:_
Planning Commission
• Monthly updates by staff
• Study sessions scheduled at the conclusion
of major tasks or other significant events.
• A Public Hearing will be conducted at the
end of each phase; PC will be asked to
accept each completed phase of the SMP
and forward to CC to
• Additional Study sessions/joint council � ,'
sessions may be held
fl ,
7
Spol.am Department of Community Development
Planning Division
Council Updates/Public Hearings
• Quarterly updates
• Council asked to accept each phase of the
SMP by resolution
• Study Sessions prior to each request for
action and prior to any public hearing
• Public hearing required for final adoption
Department of Community Development • •- .
Spokanc
j�allc� _. Planning Division N
Written comments
• Considered throughout the SMP update
• During formal comment periods
Staff Availability
Greg McCormick,AICP
Planning Manager
Project Lead
i I i
Lori Barlow Micki Harnois
Associate Planner Associate Planner
8
Department of Community Development
Spil:nnc
{ jValleY Planning Division
Questiois?
9