The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1342-79 & ZE-225-79 ~ . i ~ • ~ . { AGEWDA, li::tober' 26, 1979 TEL•EPHONE : 456-2205 'SPOKAtIE COUNTY PLANNIIdG SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE " TIME: Friday, October 26, 1979 - 1:30 P.M. (Item #1 on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre 6uilding, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1342-79, RAINBOW ADDITION ZE-225-79, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN AND R-2 a. Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley south of Broadway and approximately 125 feet east of Conkl i n Road_. - - b. Legal Description: Section 13,~Township~25N, Range 44 E.W.M. All of Tract 3 of "VERA" and a portion of . Tract 4 of "UERA" as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0`-" page 30 of Plats in the office of the Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: That portion of said Tract 4 of UERA, lying N4Jly of Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad right of way; EXCEPT the following 2 portions described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of said Tract 4 with the Nly line of the right of way of the Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad Company; th. N along the W line of said Tract 4, 157 feet; th. E parallel with the N line of said Tract 4, 280.9 ft. more or less, to the Nly line of said right of way; th. Sblly along the Nly line of said right of way to the point of beginning;Beginning at the i ntersecti on of the 4J 1 i ne of sai d Tract wi th the Nly 1 i ne of Spokane & In 1 anc Empire Railroad right of way; tn. N along said W line 157 ft. to the true point of beginning; th. E parallel with the N lAne of said Tract.4, 210 ft; th. N parallel with the W line of said Tract 386.8 ft. more or less, to the N line of said tract; th. W along said N line 210 ft. to the NW corner of said Tract 4; th. S along the 4J line of said Tract, 386.8 f t. more or less to the true point of beginning, situate in Spokane County, Washington. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKinley . . N 1014 Pines Road .Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Senske & Associates, Inc. E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 16 acres f. Number of Lots: 13 g. Proposed Land Use: Residential Office, multiple family & duplex use h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: 'Residential Office, Multiple Family Suburban and R-2 j. Water Source: Vera Water and Power k. School District: Central Valley #356 l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A topic of.discussian at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act VJAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: " .....In the event that the further investiga tions authoriied by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse r environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." . ~ L ' \ GE + ~ ~ ; • . ~ . L,aRDER~ i0 n3 na ~75 Rb ,77 17e 09 - - . , IL ~ ~ . O • ~ ~ ~ 66 . 0 BOONE , ~t o F pE _ _ ~ ~R,o~E 1342 79 ~ Nt4SC6 ACs 16T ~ t A :00 AVE ~ _ , . ;;k sM ER-sT HIGHiKaY N! dRO^ owAY AvE. BOADWAVI ' Fir - - i ~,,.-~,r,~ e v 8 ~ ~09resi~ $+Otlpn ' ~ 1 ";Secf r,a > ~ ~ • ~ ~ r YALLE WA'Y ~ o ~ r.r1 r AVL M,N1N = V ?i ! ~ , _ / - PRA E u . . vE alE - . . ,m (C M• ar p ~ P R.R, c,& . " O . ~ " , • ~ . ~ ~ 3 it~: ooo ~ WAIN L Art " . ~ r-~ ~ i• ; ~ ~r- ~ 0103 l $ ~ . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPUKAIVE CUUNTY, WASHINGTON FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE RE- CLASSIFICATION, PE-1342-79, RAINBOW ADDITION; ZE-225-79, AGRICULTURAL ' TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN AND R-2. WHEREAS, The Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee did, after public hearing on October 26, 1979, take action by motion that the preliminary plat to be known as RAINBOW ADDITION (File No. PE-1342-79) be Denied; and, WHEREAS, J. Brent McKinley, did request a special hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and testimony against the motion of the Hearing Examiner to the above described pre- liminary plat and zone reclassification; and, WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners did hold a public hearing on December 10, 1979, to consider the Findings and Order of the Hearing Examiner and testimony and request of the plat sponsor, objectors, and other interested parties; and, WHEREAS, At said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above described preliminary plat proposal and zone reclassification, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the testimony given, the Findings and Order of the Hearing Examiner, the environmental checklist, and all other evidence presented, and further having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the conclusions of the Hearing Examiner were generally valid and sufficient. NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the preliminary plat to be known as RAINBOW ADDITION and zone reclassification upgrading as described in ZE-225-79, should be and hereby is DENIED. D A T E D T H I S D A Y 0 F JAN 2 119$0 19 , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON JGaQV r_ QPET CHMN, HAR RY M. lAR N ED . ~~NSF.N ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND Cl e k of Board By: ~ ~ . 1 ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IPJ THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY SUSDIVISION ) AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1342-79, RAIN60!J ~ CO«MiSSiOr,ERS' DECISION ADDITION: ZE-225-79, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL ) OFFICE, MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN AND R-2 ) Sponsor: J. Brent h1cKi nl ey This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washinoton to render its decision concerning the request of J. Brent McKinley for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification; and The Spokane County Hearinc Examiner Committee having heard the above request on October 26 1979, did deny said application; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on December 10, 1979, at the request of the applicant, Mr. McKinley, and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to uphold the denial by the HAaring Examiner Committee. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for exzcution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 31 day of December, 1979. VERNON W. OHL-A?ard Cl erk of the *osane bv , ntague, Deputy Clerk 'I'0 THE BOAEtD OF C;OUN'I'Y COPi1~IT`'SInNLRS RECEi 1l ED ' Appeal Fee - $75 . 00 NUV 51919 COUNTY COMM lSlp~{~~, 9 Name: J. Brent McKinley Today's Date 1~~~ ~ (Please Print) Address: North 1014 Pines Road, Spokane, WA 99206 Zip Code: 99206 Home Phone: Eusiness Phone: 926-1521 Hearing Examiner Committee p.ction Being Appealed _ Title: Rainbow Addition Preliminary Subdivision Number: PE-1342-79 Zone Reclassification Number: zE-225-79 Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: October 26, 1979 S ignature : Signature of Authorized Representative: . ~ North 222 Wall Street, Suite 2(~-~~-41okane, Washington 99201 Address: YOUR REASOt1S FOR APPEAL 1. The Hearing Examiner Committee found the proposed land use to be compatible but denied the application for improper and illegal reasons. 2. The denial was not supported by evidence of record, and was therefore unreasonable. 3. The denial was in violation of Washington law. R-'-" I V E N 0 V ? 1919 p1 QSPOMN2 COUNTY " ARTMENT ' C OFFICE USE ONLY ~ Copies to: Planningfj-79 En;ineers Enviroilmental Health Fee Received: Check Cash Receipt Number ~ Hearing Date: , ~ . ' ~ ,1!\P,1 f 5 S (;IZAVF N NUGW O EVA.NS ROGCR K AhlDFRSON R E C E~ NUGH T LACKIC rii~ ~rr 202 GREAT NOR1'IAWEST BUILhING NUV 51979 ATTORNEYS AT LAW NOR7H222WnLL5T SPOKANE V'lAS1-IING70N 99201 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (509) 717 302 1 November 5, 1979 Board of County Commissioners Spokane County We s t 1116 B ro adway Spokane, Washington 99201 RE: Rainbow Addition: PE-1342-79; ZE-225-79 Gentlemen: Enclosed is Appeal Request Form to be filed on behalf of Mr. J. Brent IZcKinley, sponsor of the above captioned project. 4ve also enclose the appropriate filing fee in the amount of $75.00. we would appreciate your keeving this office advised as to the persnective hearing date on this appeal. Thank you very much for your assistance in this matter. j ery ~truly you , Y , , ~ JAIV1ES S. CRAVEN ~ JSC/bn copy to : J. Brent McKinley e : 3n! A4lQ r put adJt"; cn :h: FZl i l• r: 10' :p;Ice L,r: _ evYCT'~. The following scr,-i« u rcqurstr.d (thtck cme) Shnw tn whom and datc deli►'rrtd,.. . ti ~ r] Shoa• to w}tnm, datr, ancf addres-, of dclivrrti• ; . ~ RFSTRiCTt:I7 DELlVERY Show to whom and ditc de{ivrrcd . y 7-1 RF;'1'RICF'ED DCLIVf:R1'. -~ii:>w rn whom, dntr, and address of delivrty . S i( 0NSI'LT Pt)STMASTFR fOR FFFS) ,aar,r_LE 1Dt?RFSSFD 70 ` 3. ARTlCLE DESCRIPTiON: _ REGISTERED Hp CE lii~ NO. INSC3REt3 NO ' ~G~~7~ , w,rys oetiio sipn.w wndr.rase ex 1 ' I havr. cived thr artic drsriitx-d r SIGNATU E AQd ❑ ; tu:r•:I ,~~:rnt 1 ti E OP DELiVERY STM/1AK • , , ' S AOORESS :Comptoto onty il r tod t'i ~ i =fi . .0 " 6 UHtiBIE TO UEIivER UV ~CLERK'S-, {NITIAlS / _ . „~.-zrr~ _ ' UNITEO STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICML BUSINESS r~s~- • SENDER INSTRUCTIONS ~'"'"'~f°A ~rv~ttE ' ~ - Pnnt your neme, sOdrass, snd Zlp Cocfei in the sp~p bdow. TO ~ 0 P~v~lEN7 , • Complete Itams i, 2, and 3 on the nverse. ~ S7AGE. S30o • • Attad+ ta frcant ol articls il gwo pwmib. Qtherwhe aNix to batk ol srtods. ~ I~ I •ti~ F • E:nciorse articls "Retum Recetpt Rpuegied" adjs ~ s ~ cont to numbN RETURN TO . ~ ~ ~'r' ~ • `r ~ L L i 1%114!C1 1!T rO_ Ws -.i ~ l~ ~ . ~ ~C • ~~v/ ~ ~ - ~ Sf:~p4:R' ComNcEc itrm5 l, arrc! 3 Add yctut su'u•• :n cti•~ "!?F t l:P.?v TO" •.+xcc ,.f: 3 n+ttae ~ ~ ' 'l~hrfnlluwit~~;~r.•.,.c scy~~r~trd onc► ~ 5haw to whons ana datr dcticcird . _ . _ " r Show to whom, <)a:e. and acidress af drtit'cty' 4 RESTRI<',1'11) UCI.1VfRl' t-J Shnw ct, .vha:n anct t!scc driiverrct t t-3 RFS'i'R1C.TI:D DEI.IVFRl". Shov, erE whom. d;ue, and a(fdrrss of drhvery.$ ( t'ON5W(,'f YUSTM RtiTi.-.R t'C)R F[:FS) 2. AitTICLE ApORES3E0 TO: m ~ ~ Z 3. ARTICIE Df.SCRInTipN: ~m REGl57EftED NQ• ERTIFi£O NO. INSUREt3 NO. m "V -4 / w 1 (Alwsyt obtsin sbgrsstun o! adims.sN or amt) ~ 1 havr rcrrivtd the ariiclc drst:rilsrd atxavr. ~ 5lGNATURE 0 AAL1rc•t.cr m 70 • tn . O ~ n /~n , • >40&TE OF UEllv RY POSCMARK 70 _ m v z 5, ~1DtiRE S~Co, plste onfy if rrpuestQd) ~ n tn , ~ -4. 1! 5 UNABI.E Tn DELlYER BECAiJSE- CICRK'S m INsTtALS ~ 3 D r - - - - - - UNITED STATES POSTAL 5ERYICE orFIcrnL gusiNESs SENDER INSTRUCTIONS ~Ln fc~a vs+IvATE inc ~~Jr pdmC, adclresi, e1iK! ZIP Ctx18 ir1 thf. tpato below. UgE TO AVOIQ PAYME►OT y(;omplete itemf 1, 2, and 3 On thr re~rcrse. OF POStA(iE f3t)0 j; • • Anach to lrnnt o( articte it spece peimits. Otharwir.e ~ u$,~~ • aftlx to hack of artlctr. . r~,• . Endorse uttcla "Ratum fieceEpc Requastei" adio• u!nt to numbe- . ~A, RETURN ' TO Cj t.;t <; • N~m~r ~~I' Srnd4r► . r 1 sir:•m ot 1' O H, ` 1 / ~ ~ • :;f ~)if K ~ , . c ~t;;~t, 1. ;tc, I i. k`. ~ ltYC rfC. ~ . ~ t The follaw-cri}; scrt-scr tc tcYjur%trd (chcit k- nnr) Show to whom and date deli.•errd ; Sttuw to u•isom, datc, and addrrs< <)r dci:.•rrry t' RFS'I'RiCTl-D DELlVCRl' Show tn whom anJ dare drli.•crc<i . ; KI:51'RiCTED UEt,tV}=.RY. Sf,ow ro whom, datc, and aclrircu of drisvcrti• S (C()NSL'LT PtlSTIM:1Sl'ER E(?R FEF5) ARTICLE AApNE55EQ TO: • ~ m ~ Z 3 ARTICI.E OESCRIPTION n REGISTERED MO s CERTIFIEO NO. lN5UREQ NO. T 4 x t (Atwe}n abtmn :ipnrNro of acWrr►wo or ownt) ~ l havr reccivrd the articlr Acstrilxd zbot•c. in m SIGNATURE 0 AtJdreswC l,/fl Authorile cnc a 4 C_•~. ~ OATE pF pEIIVERY fi',QSTMARK p Z-A2 7 - ? ~ 5. ADDRESS (Complo)c on(y,f requvstYd) ~ • ` n ~ ~r , t,•.'~ m Q)~ ~ ~ r . T 6 UNABtE YO DEIIVER BECAUSE' G fA .rtq~~tA~:S D ~ •t - .~4~~ r~~ ' • ` " UNITED STATES POSTAtS~ER1lIC6yC - ~ ~ - - • ~ OFFICI)►L 8U5iNEVA SENDER INSTRUCTION$`'-~ ~~TY F8q PpIVATE ~ W.int your name, u~idrets, a+~ ZIP Coda in thU spaoe bdlow. U5E TO AVOiO PAYA~IENT • Complete itemt i, 2, and 3 an the reverse. Qf F'OS~AGE, t300 • Attxh ta front ot ,utlclo it space perm+ts. Othorw4se U,&MAIL a1fix to baCk U1 arL+Cle. r■~(l~1;~' • Enciursn srtecte "Htrtum Reaeipt Requested" adja- ~ CRI1! t(-~ :lllfTl~R'. RETURN TO ~ ~~Jl!!Ctl! ~11t~r':1 I ~ C, ~ • ~ la ~ C~ o L tStn~~c ar P. tl. Noti► ~ ~ - , n ~ c[?: K Cornr:ett itcm, i a»:! : A~td , auc u!eltc+; ~a thr "R[ t t;RN TU" slracr .yn ~ • reve ^fe. a Thc ioiZo-wynt; irniiC is rciJwcstiL~d (iherk ortr) ~ Shuvr uti v-hnm and dscc d0►vercd , C '1 ihow tc, wltiosn, datr atxi 2,48ret< o( tir lvverv t RE51'Rl(TI'I) UEM'E:RI' ~ ~ 51tinw to whom and clatc drli.•rctc!- ~ RfS"1'RtC:Tt:U DFi.lt'FRl'. Show cci Khum, dacr, anJ acidrrs.s of dcfivrry $ (C()N'Sl'1.'1' r'C3STMASTf•.R i=OR FEl:S) 2. ART►ClE AODRESSEO Tp; ~ m -4 C ~ z 3. aRTiCLE AESCRipTiON: m REGtSTERER NO. CERTtFtED NO. iNSllfiED NO, n m c~ ~o ~L~ ~ ~ M t, (AEw'rYs obtsin i1Gwu►re ol sddr*sw a eeymt) I ha:lr 'mrcivcd thc usticly dcu'ribcd Attovr. ~ SiGNATURE 0 audressr. Au(liori:.cLl sgcnt s m ~ Z, ~ • OI.TE Of OF VE.RY s'OSTNiARK ^ !b 2 ' 0 D 5 ADDRESS ~Comvloto only ol requoltedi Z V n m ~ s+ ` -i ~ 6 Ut+tABLE Tp ~FI.1VER BECAl1S£' CIERK'S ~ INITIAI,S 3 UNITED S7ATES POS7AL SERVECE oFFIcIAL ausI►vEss SENDER 1NSTRUCTIONS PENALTM FQA pA1VAT Print yOitr ,iame, alcfress, ond 21N Gx1e in the spate bolow. TO AVOta PAVMEN Cornplata itemr 1, 2, and 3 on the revve►se. OF POSTAGE. • AttsCh ta tront ot artiel8 If space pormits, Ott►etwne ~ l~~ $,MpIL aflix to twck of srticta, V~i■~. L • Erxfarye srticle "Retum ReeeiAt RequeRtacl.. sd}a ~9 . o cent to numbe! RETURN TO ~ ~r ~z zi 5 t ~,~n~~ ~~r k ~,►~<< ~ , 7'9,-?J t t StT,~: t ur f' 0. Bur ~ 5P~ e, ~t- ? p rZC'6 ~ ~c i~>, ~cacc.an,l ~~~~c ~ I e ~ Kf: c~mplrte ~tems I . :i~•, ~ Add ytrut tcltttrt,s : tlc sit I l lt♦ 1!_r" •.~a_: ,r. ° - ' r~.• 'ter•cr~r 1 I'1e fplkKtftg St't-,t:ii<.;ut.v1t11,}7C,k ,r:1:1 ~ ~ 5how to whhm and detr deit%rred C I Shoa• to vi:hom, datr. ;ind addrrss of drlivery ~ I R[:STRlCi'E~.I~ DCLI~'fR'!' ~ ~ Sht'%a• :o whom and dase deli.crcd . . . . . . . ~ ~ R:S"I'R!C°I'I-Q DELiN'ERl' . Sktnw co whflm, :litr, and addccss of drlivery. S ( CUNSt' LT Pt )STA4 AST'ER FOR FECS) 2. ARTICIE ARDRESSEO TO: ~ m ~ ~ Z 3• ARTICLE DESCRIPTIQN: n REGtSTEREO NO. CERTIFIED NO. IN5URED NO 7/ f ~ , (a...Y+ obW+,.ianwur+i or.aA.bms o..wnet m ~ I have rrceived the artietr dcscribcd abuvc. ~ SIGNATURE AddresseP ❑ 1luthorirctl a}!rat O ,A 1 ~ 4. OkTE OF O IIVER POSYMARK m 1 ~ O U D S ~adRESS (Ccmpl to onl rl reque#fvd) . 2 O A ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 UNA9lE j0 DEl1vER SEUUSE• GLEHK'S M iNITIALS O ~ r= ~ . . ~..i. )62 s~ • ' - UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE Q OFf ICIA(, BUSINE5S . ~ SENDER INSTRUCTIONS °f"'uTY F°R Pa'vA r , Pr.n; yair narr►e, eQdrtsl, arxl 21P Cocfe in the spaat l~efow. ~E TO AVptO PA'IME . Corr~plate ioetrn 1, 2. and 3 0n the rsvene. Of PQSTAG£. . Anach so iront of o►ttcle if sPaw ParmiK. Othe+wiwe ~~1 y 5►MAII aNix to batk of pticfe. j ~ • Endone arttcle "Return Roctlat Repuested" atSja- cf„t to mun,bt. 090,51 RETURN TO l aIl1Ck-l1 ~:•..,!~tl = r-~ ~ 1f fl'C1 U~ (,1 {{t• ~ 1 t,4/a - r~2 a t; tit.,tt wd , 4 J d uu: :uldress in fltr ' K}-." W N I O" s~~~c nn rrvresr. Tht• Fulictiw;ng srr~i.c is tct1ucst ed 1iht.k ostc). D ;3 5how tu Whnrn and dacc drlivrred . ; Shaw to wfiom. datr, and a(idres% of drhti,c:y R}:5'I'RICTI:D i)ELiti'T'Rl' Show M whoni and datc delivetcd. 7 RUS"1'RICTFU Df:i.lti'ERY. `Itiow to wham, ciatr, and addrrss or clrlivrry•. $ P[)STrt?tS'i'CR FOR FCE:S) ~ , 2. 11RTIClE ADDRESSEO TO: ~ ~ m C ~ ~ 3. ART(CLE OESCRlPTION: r REGiSTEREO NO CERTIFIED NO. IPtSl1REt3 NO. c ~ ~ I (Alwro rsin t~yrssturr ot ►sldrosyee a aqonil m 2 1 havr rect-wcd thc articly dr.uribcd ibovr. CA -i S+GNATUAE Addrrs,~-c ❑ ,1,stl~orirec! j~*rrt m m /~J~~ ~ ? 4. DAt OF DELIYERY ( STMARK c ~ S. ApORESS fCompiatc only ,l raquoslcdi ~ 4 ~ n ~ ~ „ 6 t1NA9LE TQ DEItYER BEC.AUSE CLERK'S I p ; INITIALS i oro: io:~•~~t-~~i ..r~ . UNlTEO STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAI. BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS PENALTM FOFI ParyATE Pr,nt your name. 8ddross, asid i:IP Cocie in tha spsce be}ow. USE TO AVOIQ PAYIdENT • Complete ite+„s t. 2, and 3 on the raversa OF AOSTAGC t3oc~ spac:@ permitt, £hhetwi6e LLS.MAIL • Attsch to front ot artkle ot •fti: to back of article. • Endorso trttcle "Retum Receipt Rcquosted" sdja• twrt to numbt~ RETURN TO Zgc? 3 ie, e_ 1>tnct ar P. ki~~ti:~ ~ l yot: I0 1Fa~c u;~ i IC Kra Thr falinw►rig sctvue is trclucstcd (rhtck anr). c ~ S11nw to a•hom ,ncf darc drlivcrrc! . ~ Show tn whom, datr, snd atldrest of .ielivcry a ~ RfSTRTCTtD DELIVTR1' tihow• to whom and datc delivrrrci . ~ RFtiTRI(_Tf:D DF.LIVE.R1' Shocv to whom, datc, and -addreu of delivcry. s f rONSt'LT POSTMASTf:R FOR FF.ES) : RRTICL£ ADORESSED TO- 9 m 8~p Z 3. ARTiCIE GESCRlPTION; z rn REGISTEREn NO CEITiF1E~~ INSURED NO ~ ~ `v 'Q -d ~ I lAfw" obtbif+ fipnWtun Ot ~ddr~tliM ot pIt111 ~ I have rrcrivcd the articly druribed abovr. ~ S1aMATURE 0 AAdtt•~vr ❑ Aufhnriird aftent ~ O 4 : - ~ DATE Of OELIVERI► ~ POSTARARK 9 / 7 a S. ADDRESS (Camol•rQ on1y of r•quo910di v r~ n+ _ m „ 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAU5E CIERK'S ~ NITIA ~ ~ > ~ - s~/ ~ • c.o e-~ UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER IN5TRUCTIONS PE%ALTY FOR PRIVATE A4* Prtnt your netru0, addrest, and 21P Code in the gx+ca beiaw. LIM TO AVOrO PAVtutENT • Cpmplett itemt i, 2, and 3 on tM ra+~. ~~S7AQE. 5300 ~ . Attach to front oi article if wacs perrt►its. OtMrwiw V.gMAIL affix to back of rticte. ~ • Fndaa anitle "Ratum Rec:cipc R"ucetrd" sdjs cent to numbR•. RETURN TO ~ . -i j~~; • c ' `a111~• 4~ tti~~ ! 1 ` J ~tti'ct u~ F'. O H~•. ~ c ~ ,t om~+lctc ,:e r.i. AnJ 3 Add Yc,ut ~1,:fca m the "Rt.TI'RK TQ" +pa.:c un " tever~c ~ 1. The followinN sft%ur is mjuc-strd (chcck nnc) ~ 51x.w tn u•}ir►m and datr drStvcrrd ~ Sltow to whom, datr, and ac3dress nf dttivcry ~ ° RES1R1C:TL'D bf L1Vt-R%' Sfiow to whaai ind dscr drtiver'eii. . . ~ 1trSTRtC:Ti:U i)rt.{YERI' ~ tihow ru whnm. dasc, and adtirras of drtitrry f ~ (t:ON`i'LT F(?'±TMASTF.R i'()R i'Ff5) 2. AATICLE ADDRESSED Tip• ~ M C ~ Z 3. ARTfCIE D£SCRtp7rON7 m REti1STfREO NO C.RTIFtED NO, INSUREC> NO :14 sl i taw.vt oaain tiqrunun or .adrf- eo or alpnd ~ ? I hxve rrceived the artick dcxribcd abuvr. . ~ SIGNATURE 0 A~i~~rrs;:c Q kuthorizcd rgent ~ m ~ O I C, ptiTF pF pELtVERY •~F~OSTMAaK 9 7 ~ O ~ S ApORESS (CGmplote only rt rrque4►d) O n ~ 70 -1 6 uNABIE TO OEItVER BECJttlSf CIERK'S ~ INfTIALS > * ~r= _ _ i~ P'~~! ~ fQ UNITED STA'fES POSTAL SERVtCE S ~ OFfIC1AL BUSiNESS ' SENDER INSTRUCTIONS PETM F FR+~'`T Pr,s,c your nomc, wcldrese, and 21P Codt m the tpac~ txlow. ~?O I►VOtO AY~t~ • ComPlste its~m 1. Y, ar►d 3 or~ the reva►~. OF PO E. • Attach co fresnt of srticle it stme pemits Otheiwise nttir to bsck ot MiCk. 1. • E ncftxm artKle "Retum RnceiPt Requestaci" odia• cent ro numb•r RETURN TO ~ ~ ~ ~ucr'I ar P ~ ~ 4 • 2 , , . . O `,'r! k ,nplrf: lte~nr i. Jnil ~ A Jd yoUt ad,1r--~4 in s':: ~ te+Ytw. . ! ~I~hC (a11~~Win~; srr•,; r iL rc.;ucs;,;~ (~hcck ,,n; ) ~th~~lwt0*K'hom arxf dale cklivrred ~ I ~ - L ShoK' tn whnm, c1atr. and address af Jelivcty ~ RF..STRTC,TFD UEI.1vCRY , Show tu h•hum and cla!r dtlivrred.. . ~t I!' RES'i'Rlc`1'E13 UEI.IVFRI' Show c~, whom, datr, and address o( de4avcry.~ (COstitii't.T Pf)STMAST[R C[)R FCFS) 2. ARTICLE AQDRESSEO TO: s ~ c ~ 3. ARTICI.E t7E5CRIP17IdN: n~+ REGISTERED N0. C£RTIFIED NO. INSUREO HO. ~ 6t7 f .3 . (Alwwp obtsin siyrutun af ocfdrsssre aswatl ~ 1 have rec. ~;~,vcd the a~.K~~tclc c~rs~'ribtd tibove, ~ SIGNAf UAE ~ ❑ Aditresse ❑ 1ieorizeJ agc:nt t) , , ~ l • ♦ ~ 1. 1. t ~ . C D `s dATE ~ 7LLIVER'f ~ - ` ~ S. 1~ODRE55 'Compttt~t on{y i1 ►eduesli~ 1979~ t~i+ 4 ~ ~ b UNA$LE 70 QEIIvER BECAUSE: 1 CL K fn tN tl1 S C ~ r ; . . . I ~ ct, UNITED STATES POS7AL SERVICE OFFICIAI BUSINESS ~ ♦ SENDER INSTRUCTIONS PEN`in fOA °A"~ATE P: irt yo.rr ~me, Oc}dt4SS. attd Z I P (',ocN m the spOte bllOw. ~ TD AYOiD PAY1rtEN7 af vOSTACiF, iM • Co+npieu itert►s l, 2, and 3 on the revane. . Anscn to tront of aezkie It %xice permin. Osh*rwife U.S.MAlL aHix ta bnck of atkle. - Endone rticle''Retum RswFpt Requeswd" adis cant to numbo. RETURN TO 14) ~urnr ~~t 4•n~l~r ~ „ ,I e , . , ` trrrr r.r F`~. }3t~,~ c , ~ SENSKE & ASSOClATCS,I~►C. E. 9r~03 SPRAGUE AVE. SPOKANE, WA 99206 ' ` : `_rC q L ~ ~ GCT16'77 • ~ ~ . ~ w , ~y ~n ~ ~ c~►si a~acK ~ r--~`- , ~'~~'~,,~j'~► Q y ~ ro a L ~ c ~ O • . ~.7~ ( ~ , ~'°'f ~O "y~, ~ oar~ ~ Mr. UJiI l ia L. Mal inak ~ E. 11 ~l 4 1 st Ave. D ls'I ND7~tf Spokane '~!4 99206 7hD NdTIC~ A •[TYNN 0w2olwl NY~A rf ivw 3w- • P0IR M~~ i 5ENUER Completr items t, snd 3. 4~^ Add yuw addtess in the "ILE-CURN TU" %par,a on 0 3 f"tf7t ~ I The followin}; scrvitc :s rctlucst"! (chcck anr) ~ r F-I Show to vvham And da(r drlwcrrd : S}row to whom, ditrr, and addrcs, of drliti•rrt i: m Rt:S7'RtC"Tt:L7 UE•LiVrRl' y' Shaw to whom and dace deli%rrr,l , RESTRICTFD DELIVER1'. Sh4w to w•hom, datr, und adJress o: 40+vcry c (CONSl'L? POSTMA51'ER FOR FFFr-► d 2. AFiTICLE ADDRESSEO TO! m i ~ . t 2 3 ARTICLE DE5CRIPTION: REGISTEREO NO. ENTIf1ED NO. INSUREQ NO. V 74 t (Always obtain ugnaarv ot addesem aapntR m ~ I have trceived the article dcuribed abavc. ~ SIGNA7URE ~ -~;lclscsscr ❑ xutl)k?i1tc,i atitcslt n m O Z N C DATE OF DEIIVERY P"OSTMARK m m O A~ 5. II~DRESS (Completc ontr H requQStofi v ~ T 4 " 6 UNABLE TO DEI.WER BECAUSE- CIERK'S j ~ INITIALS 3 ~ o~o: ~ns-~sr~ra L ~ ~ -~r - - - M ~ r ' 1 ~ `:ile No. PE-1342-79 ZE-225-79 SPOKANE COUNTY r HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on October 26, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy Chairperson, Eldon Thomas and John Culler. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, J. Brent McKinley, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and zone change, PE-1342-79, Rainbow Addition and ZE-225-79, Agricultural to Residential Office, Multiple Family Suburban and Multiple Family for subdivision of 16 acres into 13 lots for residential office, multiple family and duplex and there being present, the following applicant or representative: BRENT McKINLEY, ATTORNEY JAMES CRAVENS, TOM SLADE C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 2. That the owners of adjacent lands urged the Hearing Examiner to await action on the application until the "Broadway/Sullivan study is adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. 1 F.-~ No. PE-1342-79 ZE,22S-79 3. The fallov,ring are additionai findings af fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That this propo5al shauld be deniect vvithout prejudice due to technical reasons eancerning plat acreagesr and aciditionally because the praposa[ cavers an area which is subject to the Broadway/Sullivan study and the Board ❑f County Cornmissiones~s letter requesting the study although nat calling far interim zontng, does strongly suggest that no further zone changes be approved until the advption af the B roadway/Sull!van Plan by the Board of County Commissianers. E. C3RDER The Hearrng Examiner Cammittee, pursuant tv the aforementioned, finds that the appficatian of J. Brent McKinley far a pr-eliminary plat, Rainbaw Addition and a zone change as descr~ibed rn the application shfluld be denied v;rithaut prejudice. Matian by: Thamas Secanded by: Cul)er 11ote: Ur,animous H EAR I NG EXA Mf NE R COMh+'I I T TEE ~ ~ ~ F t 7 ~Y ChaIT"ma~ _ I 0 - r.~~ i,I~ ~i ' .~_1 -.~l~ ~•r ATTE-17 T: FRED L. DAYHARSH Rlanning Director f f By: 2 . ~ ~ Fa~' ~ ' ► ' '~~~'i ' * • ~ ~~r , r . WR, ' 4 ~ I y ~p ~:~1_ j;' ~ ~ ~r~ S : ~.1 ~ ~ . ~ i, , ► _ ~~L.f.,...- ti~ ~r,t►+,~1, • O! f/C t OI V COUNJ'Y COMM/SS/ONERS J + 1,,` _r ~ / ~i i, • - ~~,~:~1 _ ,~.;;~1~1,, r fl y n,I , ~ , ` RAY W. CHRISTENSEN hIAHRY M LAFtNED JERHY C. KOPET First DisuiCt SPC'niid Distnct Third Oistrict July 12, 1979 SPOKANE. WASI-IINGION 99201 Spokane County Planning Camniission North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 RE: Detailed Plari For loniny the Area IniNacted by the Valley t-lall DeveloprTent Dear Planning Conu»issioners: The Board recogni zes tha t the devel opiiient of the Va 11 ey Pla 11 as a regional shopping center will exErt oreat impacts on traffic flow , and demand for high value land uses along Sullivan Road outside of the shopping center. IJE wish the land use conversiotis in response to thi s demand to be ca rri ec1 out i n an orderl y, planned manner. We, therefore, request yoLI to initiate tihe above-described _~gnino_Plan as a basis for block zoniny or iridividual zone reclassification for the Sullivan Road and aroadway corriders, conduct a publiG heariRg as required i n RCt•1 36 . 70, and repor•t sa i d pl an to the Board i n 60 days. The Plan should deal wii.h the followinq: ~ 1. Designatioti af areas for future developinent of commerci al ancl/or hi qh (lensi ty res identi al uses. 2. Provi si on for• t►-ansition froin h inh intensi ty uses to 1 ower• dcns ity uses to iniiii nii ze adverse impacts and 1 arid use c.on f 1 i cts . 3. Proposeci iue t Iiocls o f impl emen tat.ion. We further direct tihe f'larin iiiy Department to establ i sh the boundaries o f the s tudy a rea a nd to prov i cle da ta concern i iiq presen t 1 aiid use and zoning patterns ancl whatever other avai lable inforuiation the Planning Comrnission minht neecl. continued . . . R ECEIVED J CIL 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Spokane County Planniiig Conmiission July 12, 1979 Page Two , , We feel that it is very iniportant to cJevelol) an acioptecl plan fior tlils area prior to the expected pressures for grov,th and developinent. Your assistance is greatly apprECiated. Very truly yours, BOARD OF COUiVTY COMMISS10PdERS ~m Ray lJ. Christensen, Chairnian nas cc: Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY C0MMISSIONERS OF SPOKA14E COUNTY, WASHINGT01i . IN THE FIATTER CONCERIIING PRELIMINaRY SUBDIUISION ) AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOh PE-1342-79 RAINBOW ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC ADDITION; ZE-225-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIOENTIAL ) HEARING OFFICE, MULTIPLE FAMILY SU6URBAN AND R-2 ) SPONSOR: J. BRENT McKINLEY ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEti that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M. ON DECEt•1BER 10, 1979, at its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above-mentioned preliminary subdivision and ione reclassification on the following described property: Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley south of 6i-oadtiay and approximately 125 feet east of Conklin Road. Legal Description: Section 13, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Al1 of Tract 3 of "VERA" and a portion of Tract 4 of "VERA" as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" page 30 of Plats in the office of the Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: That portion of said Tract 4 of VEP.A, lying N4lly of Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad right of way; EXCEPT the following 2 portions described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of said Tract 4►vith the lily line of the right of way of the Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad Company; t!. N along the W 1 ine of said Tract 4, 157 feet; th. E paral lel ►-ri th the t1 1 ine ui said Tract 4, 280.9 ft. more or less, to the rlly 1 ine of said right of way; th. S611y along the Nly line of said right of way to the point of beginning;Beginning at the intersection of the tiJ line of said Tract with the tily 1 ine of Spokane b Inland Einpire Railroad right of way; tn. N along said W line 157 ft. to the true point of beginning; th. E parallel with the N line of said Tract 4, 210 ft; th. N paral lel wi th the W 1 ine of said Tract 386.8 ft. more or less, to the t! 1 ine of said tract; th. W along said N line 210 ft. to the PJW corner of said Tract 4; th. S along the t-1 1 ine of said Tract, 386.8 ft. more or less to the true point of beginning, situate in Spokane County, Washington. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GI'JEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition to an appeal on said matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 13 day of November, 1979. VERNON W._ 0 Af~D - CLERK OF TI BOARD;' ~ . by ~ 04 nc nP P1oontaaue, Deput.y Cle = Prip 20. That the filing of the final plat is not to be allowed until substantial development (The construction of the Valle Mall) has commenced in that area directlY North across Broadway~~ntil the Broadway-Sullivan Area Plan is approved stipulating that this plat, "Rainbow Addition", is consistent with that Plan. ~ . ~ • File # PEY 13~~?'79 x.~ ~ ~ ~ 9 - Z. , v~ Sec . T'sh' p a ~ R'ge C lassification Q ro Qo Qz g ~ ; . z• c~ • . ' . Proponent ISREnT M*-Kjn L.C ~.J . . ti c _ ) n . c : q r •r T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M i N A T I O N PRQPQSL0/j: +N,4 ~ . DECLARATION OF NnN_tirNrFlcan~rF (proposed/final ) (slgnificance/non-significance) 1. Description of Proposal: rnrlt-rLPLF zQn)12?~_p F PRpPTQ oaQrLaE ~ R OFFI C U1 GL PQ R T M i"c /1 T$ r 0.r)a O U Pcc1G ,u c e~ 2. Proponent: J. B~t~G,r- 0 7 0 ~ 3. Contact Person : ~ 0fn SL4 06 Phone: 9Q44-4$ 7S9 4. County Action(s) Requested: v/ Zone Change ✓ Preliminary Piat Approval: Finai Plat Approval Change of Condition Other: , 5. Location of Proposal : S. ca o+ o a40 n c Ert T Tc> 0#400oc-vOL ` v F oRa. , 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WA5NiNGTON This proposal has been determined to NOT have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is NOT required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Oeclaration : Final Declaration : Name Fred l, . Ddyharsh Name Signature Signature Title Director Title Ch~ir~»an Department County P1 anni ng Oepartment Heari nq Exami ner Commi ttee Da[e October 11, 1979 Date u- ' o v e r R ev i sed 6/ 1 J79 il HEp►RING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION N0: 1-3~~ r,~F (Check one) I would like to be on record in FAVOR ~ r OPPOSITION l ~ NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? YES NO YOUR NAME: (please print Address: ?69 s~~ HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUeLIC HEARING . APPLiCATiON NO: 40 ~ (Check one) I would like to be on record in FAVOR l ~ OPPOSITION NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? YES NO . S.C YOUR NAME . (please print) address : ~J• j~ A ~ . ~ 1 i HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEaRING APPLICATION N0: (Check one) z I would like to be on record in FAVCR ~ OPPOSITION l ~ NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? YES NO 7v YOUR NAME: f~m~~~lq Ilet0-P-0~ (please print) Address: Skcajuua « .,►a ~ , HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC NEARING APPLICATION N0: 7<7 (Check one) ~7 I would like to be on record in ~ f FAVOR ~ OPPOSITION l ~ NEUTRAL Oo you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? l r YES NO YOU R NAME : ~e ~ J= (please print) Addres s: Lo /-.70 ,.h NEARING EXAh1INER COMMITTE 2 PUBLI~ HEARING / 3 y ~ APPL ICAT ION tJO: Z,*,' (Check one) I would like to be on record in FAVOR ~ OPPOSITION NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? ~ YES , NO YOUR NAME: (please print) Address : 1~ 77 - - ~ HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION N0: 7;- ~C (Check one) I would like to be on record in ~ FAVOR C ~ OPPOSITION l f NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? ~ YES ~ r rio YOUR NAME : c' (please print) Address : ~ 8°~ ~ ~C . ~ , vvj , i HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING APPL ICAT ION NO : 7~ (Check one) I would like to be on record in f j FAVOR ~ OPPOSITION l ~ NEUTRAL Do you wish to 7ESTIFY at this Hearing? YES 1,}~f NO , YOUR NAME : S (please print ~ Address : ~6?d ~ ra , ~ y (/era, d a-1 ~ i HEARING EXAMINER COh1MITTEE PUBLIC HEARING . APPL ICAT ION NO : (Check one) I would like to be on record in FAVOR ~ OPPOSITION NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? f ~ YES g] NO YOUR NAME : • ~,¢U.L f~• C/L1~-S'~~,~ (please print Add r e s s : .4'. 16 769 Of'a~t ~ X _ ~`ff L~ ~3~.t-. \~11~1~~ • n ~ HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PU6LIC HEARING APPLICATION NO:_~~-&f<.2- 7~~ I (Check one) I would like to be on record in FAVOR OPPOSITION l I NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? YES NO YOUR NAME : ~4,40V / (please print) , Address: ~ 1~e7G'g r1~~ v1 C` ~ ~ 4 ~ vv~J • HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION N0: C 1 ( Check one ) I would like to be on record in l ~ FAVOR / r OPPOSITION NEUTRAL Do ou wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? YES ; j NO YOUR NAME: (please print) Address :'Z,~). C', "V ~ 049 20 8 , HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC NEARING APPLICATION NO:-4r- (Check one) I would like to be on record in FAVOR OPPOSITION f r NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? YES NO I YOUR NAME : ovi (please print) Address : 1~ ~ l OFFiCE OF CDUNTY ENGIIVF.ER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date ~CtJVE.r 2 S 19-74_ Inter-office Communication To coao-tc tj P%Qk,n,n t nck DsF q,ec,nn .c w`t' f rom'B 0 ft t~° 'V 91 at' c~'o r Subject13~Z~7'~ Qa►I Nbew W :,v E~4~eeIr`s CoRudlT;o•o ;or p 1 at A Q~► ro u s~ l,. . CoLLat E~►.~ ~t! Cv r ~S RoAd C o-~" d:t-to A'J DcTo ber Ile~ 1~ 7 9 . ( 51►,owa as GcMd;-~►o to Nv►wtber 3-7 5~ta-~4 ANA lqSiS 51~. oUA d b e. a. 5 0`- P r oT a 5 e d C o-ri d~-t ~ o,j Fo r' r~ ( a.1- A4 p ro ki a\.. , rotm 327-L 5POKANE VALLEq FIRE DEPARTIAENT ~ S&Iaoze- &"4 74e, ~14Wzez~w aW 6,1~/~. / ~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 zu R. Aim, Gr October 18, 1979 VA(ally Hubbard ~ Plat Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dea r Mr. Hubba rd , The following preliminary s d i ns and zone classifications for upgradi ng have been re e r fi re protection : • PE-781-71 Orchard Lane d tior Charbonneau PE-1233- 78 Sun Acres A di ti on ZE-143-78 Fox ~ P E-1339- 79 A1 co t r~~~ k, ZE-223-79 Rayn r PE-1340- 79 Bl'~a ip`e y eeon A Re 1-1 #1 n s PE-1341- 79 ~w "~`Pvcre 2nd ZE-221-79 an ~ ~ ~ ~ PE-1230 7, or der sa -r-~• f P E-1 5 78o0na4,r n te ~ P ~ ZE- 79 C4r,pen d M i s and hy~rants _n < he abov areas. ~ ; , - L" - --y • -~i -13„~2~=79 Rai~bow A d~.ti~in -~'25-79 McKinley- Mains ' ,and b eed .be instal `e'n this area:-----Aecess plans for-firefi-gtrtfng~-eqtr~pmen~arroun•4-°the-bu•'rl-d''nq shall be-a-pproved prior to bu•i1-ding permit-Tssuance°. - • ' . ECEIVE A 1 6~fiC `"Lt. of Inspectors ' 0 C T 2 2 1979 AC. .sn SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARtMENT - ~ PRE VENT FIRES SA YE LI VES J , ~ • , *MEXHIBIT J ~ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Tom Sl a,de • • ~ being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of The United States of America and a resident of the State or" Washington over the age of 18 years, That on the 16th day of October , 19 79 , I personally deposited fn the United States mail at L! S~ with sufficient pos tage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the 6th day of October , 1919who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) foot periphery of the applicant's controlled property. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. - DATED this Z104 day of 19 7? . u~- SUBSCRIEED' and SWORN to before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for thep'gtate of Washington, residing at Spokane. ~ APPLICATION NO, . ~ .a . ' "AGEtJDA, October 26, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 " SiZOKANE COUNTY PLANN I NG SUBD IV IS ION HEAR I NG EXAh1I NER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, October 26, 1979 - 1:30 P.M. (Iteni #l on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1342-79, RAINBOW ADDITION ZE-225-79, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN AND R-2 a. Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley south of aroadway and approximately 125 feet east of Conklin Road. b. Legal Description: Section 13, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. All of Tract 3 of "VERA" and a portion of Tract 4 of "VERA" as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" page 30 of Plats in the office of the Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: That portion of said Tract 4 of VERA, lying NWly of Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad right of way; EXCEPT the following 2 portions described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of said Tract 4 with the Nly line•of the right of way of the Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad Company; th. N along the W line of said Tract 4, 157 feet; th. E parallel with the N line of said Tract 4, 280.9 ft. more or less, to the Nly line of said right of way; th. SbJly along the Nly line of said right of way- to the point of beginning;6eginning at the intersection of the W line of said Tract with the Nly line of Spokane&Inlan( Empire'Railroad right of way; tn. N along said W line 157 f t. to the true point of beginning; th. E parallel with the N line of said Tract 4, 210 ft; th. N parallel with the W line of said Tract 386.8 f t. more or less, to the N line of said tract; th. W along said N line 210 ft. to the NW corner of said Tract 4; th. S along the Ir! line of said Tract, 386.8 ft. more or less to the true point of beginning, situate in Spokane County, Washington. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKtinley N 1014 Pines Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Senske & Associates, Inc. E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 16 acres f. Number of Lots: 13 g. Proposed Land Use: Residential Office, multiple family & duplex use h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Residential Office, Multiple Family Suburban and R-2 j. Water Source: Vera Water and Power . k. School District: Central Valley #356 l. -Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tdnks m. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Nearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." 4~ . ` H! 4 ~ , • GARDER~ ML n3 na M Rh ,n 178 ~s , _ - : - . VL ~ t ~ , 0 J e . ~ , _ . DOON E ' t ,t. . ~ •~~0~, IIPO . ~ o M PE -1342 -79 , BRIDGE yo • ` C A _DO ~AVE ~ o~~ N94sC6 AC.16+ . ! N'E R St~ ATE NIGNWaY N~ r eROADwAV AV E. . v . „ ~ Fir~ ~ r . O~tSl~ 5 ~ ion , • . ~Z ~ , o < . ;StCt rio ~ VAI.LE WAY = , . . ~ = • ~I - t I Z 0 ~ v~~r t~ Iw AV& M*IN z V r-J ~ lu rj ~ r ? r 4 1.~ .f' L v i Z ~ Q ~ PRAGuE • F ~ ~ • i. ~f.i. t eA~ ~ G ~i~ s V~~ vE A~E (C M. 6T. P ~ p R.R. c 0 : - . ' . ' ~~.-CQ?~ - , • , ~t O rs ~ ~ I .1 Ro ; 1000 tti . , ~N~AT N E Z r f W L ~ . ~ ~~.o i ~ f1~ ' . r"'~ ~ . t• ! f ! ' . ,Ji-.ll., 1 FL , ~'y ~°~lc.':i. ►.wew. •.•e~'~'Rj~ 1>0lf/CC OF' covNrr co.bMIssIoNtRs . • . RAY W. CHRISTENSEN HARRY M. LARNEU JERRY C. KOPET First District Second District Thud District July 129 1979 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 ~ y ~ Spokane County Planning Commission Morth 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 94260 RE: Detailed Plan for Zoning the Area Impacted by - the Valley Ma11 Development Dear Planning Commi ssioners : The Board recogni zes that the devel opment of the Val 1 ey P1al 1 as a regional shopping center will exert oreat impacts on traffic flow and demand for high value land uses along Sullivan Road outside of _ the shopping center. We Wj_5h the land use conversions in response to this deniand to be carried out in an orderly, planned manner. We, theretore, reques t you to i ni ti ate the above-described 7nn.i ns, P1an as a basis for block zoning or individual zone reclassification for the Sullivan Road and aroadway corriders, conduct a oublic heariq,g as required in RCb! 36.70, and report said plan to the Board in 60 days. ~ The Plan should deal with the following: ~ l. Designation of areas for future development of commercial and/or hiqh density residential uses. 2. Provision for transition from high intensity uses to lower density uses to minimize adverse impacts- and land use conflicts. 3. Proposed methods of iniplementatioti. We further direct the Planning Department to establish the bounda ries of the study area and to provide data concerning present land use and zoning patterns and whatever other available information the Planning Commi ss i on mi ght need. continued . . . R ECEIVED ' ,1UfL i:►1979 ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNjY PLANNING QEPARTMEHT ' ~ - - : , `Y ' Spokane County Planning Conunission July 12, 1979 Page Two We feel that it is very iinportant to develo .an_ ad_o ted plan for thas ar qA,pLjgr to the expected pressures"tor growth anc development. Your assistance is greatly appreciated. _ Very truly yours, BOARO OF COUNTY C0rlt1I SS IONERS Rt*j P44;04roA**~~ Ray W. Chri s tensen, Chai rnian nas cc: Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director r ~ ~ r ~ 20. That the filing of the final plat is not to be allowed until substantial development (The construction of the Va14dMa11) has commenced in that area directly North across Broadway s until the Broadway-Sullivan Area Plan is approved stipulating that this plat, "Rainbow Addition", is consistent with that Plan. . G ~ ~ ► ~ ~ (T ~ a ~ L ~ v ~ . ~ v . . y ~'r • ; 1 - ~ ~ 1001 BOARD OF COUTJTY COMsI SS IOrJERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, VIASIiIIqGTON I ' FINDIiJGS AND ORDER REGARDING: ZE-142-77, AGRICULTUR.AL TO COr4NiERCIAL, Known as Valley Mall • IIHER,.EAS, '1'he Spokane County I`lanning Commission did, after public hearing on September 22 and 28, 1978, forward to the 8oard of County Commissioners a recommendation that the Zoning 14ap (be) changed from the existing Agricultural classification to the Commercial classification on property described as follows: Section, 13, Township 2511, Range 44 ,E. W. PI. PARCEL A: That part of the Sirl 1j4 of Section 13 described as follows: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the jq 1/4 corner of said Section 13, which is the true POB; thence IJ along the E side of County road 649.32' ; 1/4 of said Section 13; thence S 89°3?' E 504.3'; thence S 649.32'; thence S 89°51' ta along the V line of County road 530.3' more or less to the POB. PARCEL B: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of Section 13-25-44; thence S 89°51' E along the 14 line of County road 540. 3' to the true POI3; thence I1 1, 305. 25' to a point; thence S 89°57' E 519.36' to a point; thence 0°3 1/4' , W 1, 306. 12' to a point on the N line of County road; thence 24 89°51' W along said N line of County road 518.08' to the POB. PARCEL C: Part of the S 1/2 of the Ml 1/4 of Section 13-25-44 described as follows : Beginning 20 feet iJ and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said section; thence S 89°51' E along the N line of Broadway Road No. 443 for 1,058'.30' to the true POE; thence Id 0°03 1j2' E 1,306.121to the tJ line of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of said section; thence S 89°57' E along the N line . 519.36'; thence S 0°07' 17 1,306.99' to the N line of said road; thence 17 89 ° 51' tV along the i1 line 518.631 to the true POII, ' excepting that part of the r/w of PSIi 11o. 2. ALSO, that portion of the S 1/2 of the II 1j2 of Section 13-25-44 lying Sly of the „ Sly line of PSIi No. 2, described as follows : FARCEL D: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the 11 1/2 corner of said Section 13, and running thence S 89°51' E, along the 11 line of Broadway Avenue 2,612.62' to the true POB of the tract of land herein described; thence 11 0°14' E 1,303.73'; thence S 89°51' E 519.361; thence S0°17 1/2' 1-1 1,309.60' to a point on the N line of said Broadway Avenue; thence 11 89°51' W along said nroadway Avenue 513.08' to the POB, except the r/w conveyed to Spokane Valley Irriaation Co.; and except the . E 200' thereof conveyed to Highway Chapel, Inc. PARCEL E: I3eginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the ta 1/4 corner of said Section 13 and running thence S 89°51' E, along the N line of IIroadway Avenue, 1,576.46 feet ~ ~ • µ~~M'~~~~~ ~~-,~1'~.`~' ~'L ',r:Mv~"~►'' ~1"%~4-Y,~i"-t ~ ='y~"`'~ ~,ri~''~"` r f'~G _ ~ , _ 7'~ + y.., r' r ~ rJ• ~ . r1~' A ~ ~ ` r ' `~b?~ ~Y ~ ` ~ r~~~L''~►y'/~. s ~ w +~/h '~.tit. _ . • . 'rw ~~'1/' - .y~"` 7 ; •1~ 'r , . "l 1 r ~ ~A f ~r ~v : y 7' ~ _,.`4 - ~ _:.a= _ ~ ~ . : ~Lt` ~...'it.~ti-_ ~"i Ci'~..'S..': ►J~'~.+i i."'i ~'Y~.J. ~~~`.~c.iY"aA+ w, 6"F+r.t-~? A 1_~ 'S~1 i._. r ~ ~~ve: ~ - - . ~ ~ _ r- ~r I; • _ C the use of nroadway Avenue west of Sullivan P.oad in order to prevent adverse effects on Progress School; provided, however, that this restriction shall not apply during the surrmer months when the Progress School is not in session. 3. riechanical systems such as heating, sewage facilities and air conditioning units shall be desinned to abate noise by utilizing sound and sight baffles. 4. Other than as may be permitted for illuminated signs, . "down lighting" shall be installed so that no light- ing within the mall property extends beyond the site. Footpath illuminations shall be installed along pedestrian ways. 5. A reasonable area for comnuter parking shall be incorporated into the mall including an area desig- nated for bus loading and unloading. The size and ' location thereof shall be determined by the Spokane County Planning Director, subject to final approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 6. Facilities for bicycle usage shall be developed including areas where bicycles can be secured. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall subr►iit to the Planning Department plans for pedestrian and bicycle lanes. M 8. 1he following energy-conservation measures shall be incorporated in the actual construction of the mall to improve the energy efficiency thereof: (a) Suilding orientation and design details for r.►axir,lum solar efficiency; (b) Use of lanascaped earth berming along exterior walls and reduction of window area; (c) Use of tinted glass, double glass or thermal glass in windows; . , (d) Use of roof overhang or rolladen-type sunscreens in glassed areas; (e) Insulation in roof, ceilings and walls; (f) Use of high performance heating and cooling units; (g) Primary use of fluorescent rather than incandes- cent lights, except for design accent purposes. _2_ f ~ . : ~►y- r' .t~~'••..~l~.'rc1 !t '•~'~-/~~`.r-~►I~,ti'~"F~'¢''^~' _ " ir~..r~ \'~'`7~'r~,~~!'~ ~,~M~'r..~►~~ l ' ~V~'r . . ` ~ _ ` ~ .T!'~a► ~ ' s~t~ r1 ~ • r~. ~ ` ~ w~~ ~ • '[y '~~„t`y r +I_ ,y-,~~ _~Y.~~, ' ^.~.1"-'^ ~.S•._wr/ w~r~~.~~+~ ~x`~~~'~/~~ 11~ ~ ~C~►~•j4~`~" rM►' ~`I~~~/~ ~ ± r~r - qi ' ~ r I v► ~ ~ , ~ d t ~ • + f • 1 • 1 i 1•~'~~~i`~~'.~~~-vnii ~v-~-i`...: '.r. - ~••'t1'~-i. e ✓~l'..-~'~t'1*x= aJ-l.7.. :`t'r'r!~"cr.•!*'~ ~ Y'1."1.-c.C '~`^h.+. -~..1~1r+~- • • w.. FIIJUIPIGS - LOCATIOI4AL CRITERIA The IIoard of County Commissioners considered the site location as an integral part in reaching their decision. "L'he 8oard hereby finds the following: 1. ^he site is located adjacent to an interstate freeway to the north and adjacent to two hiohly traveled arterials on the south and west thereby limiting the prospective residential use of the property. 2. The proPerty owner to the east of the subject pro- perty has approved of tlie proposed use of said pro- • perty for commercial use. 3. Zone Classifications: , a. ilorth - Agricultural, 6/10/57 b. liest - Commercial, 3/9/78, 1969 and 1971 c. South - Agricultural, Two-Family Residential ~ Family Residential, 3/27/42, 6/11/74 and 8/5/76 d. East - Agricultural, 3/27/92 Land Use : a. Site - Vacant. b. ilorth - Red Lion Aiotor Inn and Freeway. ' c. I7est - Commercial business. d. South - Fire station and sinqle family residence. e. East - Vacant land and a church. 4. lhe noise levels emanating from the freeway and . adjacent arterials restrict the use of the subject _ oroperty for residential use. 5. The site has a high degree of visual exposure. 6. The site was selected by the applicant based on market analysis as reported in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 7. i•he site size of 70 acres is between the recomr►ended size of 35 acres to 80 acres for a regional shopping mall. 8. Iiigh accessibility by auto or transit to the center is a prime essential for site selection for a regional shopping center and the subject site is so situated. 9. The site is near a populated area and in an area that is growing rapidly. lhe Spokane County population forecast by SrIATS is 334,000 for 1985, 352,000 for 1990 anc3 386,000 for the year 2000. In adc3ition, a report entitled "Design PoPulation Uodate for -3- . f''1r' -r'~: "'~1+"'y. y✓ +S c'~`1~~'t" iI"t►.: 1'' ~ • .ti!Y►~" '2 v'►. " [a-- ~ vc ~ ~ ww ~„r ~ ~~.`~:/~"1►.J~' r • ~ 1 ~.Y 1 r Y+r "'`~V~rrli+~ IY~ ~ ♦ ~ M ' ,,V . , ..`,-M~' ~~"~w~ vL'~~ ..t .~Y, ~ ~ ~"''~e~''j°,,1~'"~ ~ f V V ~ i ~r~► ' l ~ '.M,~ r -~r..`ld...~ ,~v~ ~1~~^r=~~►.+)"'~1c.r'r w[~..•p'~ ^ ;Y~~ ~ ~ '~'t* ` .1~~►~ a.{ f i J11. _ _ , J► ~ ! _ r ~ . J.' . . r . . ~ .w.. ~ ~ t 1 . • .~/r ~~C wAr \1L. ti' W-V Spokane County Comprehensive Plan - IdovemUer 1978" has a design population for the Snokane 14etropolitan area of an additional 70,000 people by the year 2000. 10. The Spokane Valley area east of the City of Spokane is a rapivly-growing area which is not served by a regional shopping center. ihe said Spokane Valley area is in need of a regional shopping center to serve tlle residents tliereof and to avoid the requirement for saic3 resicients travelling substantial distances to existing shopping areas with comr.iensurate expenditures . of energy. 11. The site for a regional center should be located near freeway off-ranps and the subject site is to situated. 12. The site is a continuous parcel and is not separated by any roads, streets, or other physical barriers. 13. In approving this zone change, the Board has con- sidered other possible locations for a regional shopping center in the Spokane Valley. 14. The Board finds the following favorable site conditions: (a) Accessibility (b) Continuous parcel (one-piece) (c) Sufficient site area for expansion and buffering (d) :1o grading problems (e) Close to expanding residential areas (f) The development of the site will not result in the disruption of environmentally sensitive f lora or f auna . , FINDINGS - ECONOMIC CRITERIA ; In their deliberation the Board evaluated the economic viability of a reqional center for this location. ihe following ~ criteria were found to exist: 1. ihe area surrounding the proposed development presents favorable market and economic conditions. 2. llepartment stores with consumer acceptance will be the key to insure the center's economic vitality. The applicant has designed the mall to include four development stores. 3. The Board finds that a regional shopping center will not unduly affect the City of Spokane's Central Business District. -4- . ~ ~~''f"/~' t►~ ~+~1~'~`~~It J►1r4~4^ ~ ' ~SC~~A►~►~ ~ `►~~7~/►ri'`"'~~~~t1r s~~~ ~~"'~'~'r h ~~,~.r„~~ . •~~'~~~",y~ dpb o~ ,~'T ~/4, N"~'M'r'~ ~►,I T :~..iA•. /3~~~~~ ` ~ = 7~.1/' ' ~ Y' ~f - - ` Y ` A~` c+?'h1 ' r I. '~►I' J A i.'1 . r ~f r: ~ .r.>• ~~r. 1 I''l.. !rL a.. i •ti... • 1"_+' _ - _r~► L~_ ri./ f ="'L'T't`~~Ll~.\ ~ _'fr1/ r 9. The Itoard further finds that this proposal is consiOered an expansion to the suburbs and not a cieceiitrali zation of the central city. The IIoard finas that the real and viable resources of downtown Spokane are : (a) ihe masses of people such as shoppers, office workers, and tourists. ' (b) Offices, banks, etc. (c) Public services. (d) Government. (e) Cultural resources. 5. The IIoard finds that there may be a slight impact on existing shopping centers. However, these centers will need to be strengthenec3 by providing new businesses, parking facilities, and other public con- venience amenities. 6. lhe Board finds that the location of the Valley tiall . will assist in making mass transit more viable not only for shoppers, but for commuter traffic to downtown Spokane. Both the Valley tiall and downtown Spokane will compliment mass transit purposes. 7. The development of a regional shopping mall on the subject property will increase competition between all shopping centers, including the City of Spokane Central Business District, to the benefit of consumers. FINDINGS - DESIG'.V CRImEP.IA The IIoard finds that the design of this development will provide a pleasant shopping environment. ihe following desiyn considerations are noted: 1. The proposal contains a continuous interior peripheral roadway within the site to minimize the traffic impact upon the surrounding areas. 2. Efficient parking configuration. 3. Clustering of stores in a mall-like setting. ' 4. The erection of a landscaped earthen berm to buffer the area to the south. 5. Providing shoppers' comfort and climate control. 6. Cther design consic3erations notecl are : (a) Freedom from congestion (b) -Anple off-street parking (c) Convenient access -5- . , . ~ ^ t ~ ti-: ~✓,!''1/'.~C a'~-r ~'!'Si"'~~1~`,~_1r-~11+\.~►~w► ~ ~"t 'rn'r _ ~'~j'"L?' ~x Vl;,r~'•J •,..ti;,;~`ti~ „~~i~'~+'~`T'^J i A• • J w+ ` • ^ -T • ~ ~ ~ "i `~l ti. J ~ ti. v !1w~ ' ~ ~ _ :.r ~ ♦ r'~ ` ~ • y ~.~r+: .-..r;~- - y'. wr~ ~~l.t~~ . ~j.~ til~ r"~ ~~"'~J~ Y. . 1 s ~ ~t'~ ~l; . t~ i ~ ~ ~ .J `+*,i._ • t ~ I'~..-~.. ~r..` ~t•,,~'.., 7. ~ a ~ , ~aR ~.~~...~C, / P.. .I'~' I.a6' _ L f> _ k R._. r ~Y. ♦ r. _ ♦ .+trj t / 1a _a M. ~ .i►...~ . r ♦ . . : 7' . . (d) Efficient mass transit (e) Attractive modern buildings (f) Easy circulation (g) Cultural amenities (h) Convenient access between businesses within the mall. 7. This proposal offers a clustering of stores which will enhance customers' convenience, unlike many of the existing shopping centers which are simply "strip centers", i.e., a connection of stores with front door parking and where pedestrian access is, for the most part, from the outside. 8. The parking has been designed to eliminate hazardous conflicts with pedestrians walking from parking spaces to stores and vice versa. ORDER - CONDITIOrJS FOR APPROVAL - VALLEY &%111LL 1. ':'he decision of the Spokane County Planning Commission is hereby affirmed and the appeal therefrom is hereby denied, subject to the terms and conditions of this Order. 2. The developer shall comply with all of the rules and , regulations of the Spokane County Iiealth District and other pertinent local and state regulatory agencies of jurisdiction as they exist at the time of construc- ° tion. All necessary Iiealth District permits shall be obtained prior to issuance of buildinq permits. Sew- age collection and disposal facilities shall be de- signed so as to facilitate interception to a general srewer system and must be approved by the County Utilities Department. , 3. ' Any sewage treatment facilities shall be located at least five hundred feet (500' ) from existing resi- dences along Broadway Avenue to the south of the subject property. Fencing, screening, and landscaping of such facilities may be required by the Planning Department after submission of development plans. The sewage treatment facilities must be maintained and operated by an operator certified by the State of Washington. 4. Fire mains and hydrants shall be installed in accordance~with Spokane County Fire t•larshal's requirements. Approval of all other fire plans by the Fire Marshal shall be obtained prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. The sponsor shall develop the property generally in accordance with the concept presented to the Spokane County Planning Commissipn. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator after coordination with other regulatory agencies, will be permitted including, but not limited to the following changes: building location; building -6- I w^ _ L- ~ . ' ' ` ~s 1,,. ~h .1i►.•~ r.- .f -,~'►.J.-.~ 1...,i,~ ,,~.I.~~t - ` ~ ~.''.l'r d.'~.~`n/M `~`►"v` _~'~.rY!;.~~JM•~~+r'~J .i' ' , - :d1~ti,~1' ~w 'l~"' ~b-. .~1R~~~y. ' '~►C, ./`.r 4Y~"W.r.~~-L~, ~ l~a~. •.~~~V-'~J`~-1 dG~°~"~ • • • _ _ . . } : y .,_~~*:~r~~X r..7'~. .a.~. • . ~ w+ .~r... . ..~1r . ~.M...:. ~ - materials; building sizes; area coverage; landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the pernitted zone. 1111 variations must conform to reyulations set forth i» the Spokane County 'l.oning Orc3inancc. The original intent of developing a regional shopping mall shall be maintained. , 6.• In tlle event substantial development (the construction • of the mall) of the subject property in accordance . with the development plan has not commenced by October 1, 1985, then and in that event a hearing may be held by the Hearing Examiner Committee to con- sider either a time extension or changing the zone classification back to Agricultural. 7. If regulations emanating from the Snokane "208" t•7ater Quality 14anagement Program are in effect at the time of building permit submission, the developer shall , cor.iply with all such rules, regulations or guidelines for the protection of the aquifer. Valley Mall development plans shall incorporate "208" Program recommendation concepts, as adopted by the I3oard of County Comnissioners, subject to review approval by the Planning llirector. Any operations within the site which proposes to store, use, handle or dispose of "critical substances" as defined by the "208" Program shall be subject to review and approval by the County Planning Director. 8. A surface water runoff management plan shall be pre- pared by the Developer, meeting the approval of the County Engineer. The plan shall maximize disposal-of runoff waters through grassed percolation area,and minimize collection to drX well disposal. ihe land- . _ ..fi scaping plan hereinafter required shall incorporate t• , esuch drainage disposal concepts. - 9. . Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. 10. Z'he landscape and berming plan shall show specific cietail, including ground cover and shrubs and be accompanied by a performance bond or other acceptable security in an amount to be apProved by the Svokane County ""oning Ac?ministrator prior to the issuance of building permits. The bond shall guarantee the maintenance of the landscaping for a period of two years af ter completion of the landscaping. Instal- lations of an automatic sprinkler system shall be required. 11. Berming and landscaping shall be erected co „ ensurate with the priased construction on the subject property. As construction corunences on the project, an eight (8) foot undulating berm along I3roadway shall progress therewith so tliat berming will be in place a distance east on Broadway one hundred feet (100') beyond the easterly boundary of the ongoing phase. -7- : ~ I r ~~..s4„V{V..n,y,~A.~,~: ~~a~• I'• - ~ ,..r:•",,.r;.jrr.~~g„~..•~~..h..~•~ ' = Y,M 1.~'JZ~.+W~w~!wl~.l`~,'~.,p-~~-`t1'''~`.r~,.,r.~-L'r'~' ~4`I./'►• lj f i- R v • . ti ~ • ^ ra M~~ ./.11[' _,.w ~ ~ ~ ♦ L • . ` , r•.ti~.ai~r~~ , .r.. n. . ^r~• r '~~a'/+f `r ~ sy~ -I~ K~' ~ I~`✓' y T✓ C r ,~v i 1 . . ti _ ~ ~t ♦ ~11~N.. r_^,y • J... ~ . ! . . .A r w,.'►t 1 ` ~ • • f • ♦ y« 1- • .r ~ i . ~ ~ 'n,J. ~1..a`/'!'qi~ 4A/ r 12. t•7here neec3cd, barriers shall be erected along pro- perty lines to contain blowing debris caused by prevailing winc]s. The location and type of materials used thercfor shall be approved by the Zoning Adr►linistrator Prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The owners and tenants of the property shall form an association to insure maintenance and up-keep of the following: (a) All on-site facilities, including, but not limit- ed to: landscaping; sewage disposal; lighting; snow removal; debris removal; parking area maintenance including striping anc3 lane markers; and other required facility and/or mechanical , equipnent. 14. Right-of-tr7ay and Roadway Improvements. A. Sullivan Road from IIroadway to Sprague Avenue. 1. Spokane County had pre-existing plans for building a four-lane roadway within existing right-of-way. The County presently owns the right-of-way for said project. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construc- tion of a five-lane roadway from Sprague to Broadway including acquisition of additional right-of-way required for the fifth lane. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the developer as hereinafter specified. 3. The developer shall reir►lburse Spokane County for the cost of right-of-way reguired for said fifth lane and likewise shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of construction of the f i f th lane. 4. For each square foot of building completed on the project site, the developer shall reimburse the County one eight hundred thousandth of the above stated reimburseable costs. All reimbursable costs shall be paid by the developer in full upon completion of 500,000 square feet of buildings upon the project site. 5. In the event the developer does not proceed , with the development of the project site, the developer shall have no obligation for reimbursement to Spokane County. B. Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to State of Washington' s South Right-of -IJay Line for Highway I-90. -3- . . ~ ~ ~ ~"-~`1. ~;.~cr-r-~S( ~%r •1: ~ ~~r~v,!'•b^1►,`~,~.Z • - - _ •,,,~,.~►'~r.''~-►~,,'~r ~ . ~.ic_. _ ~ "~r.■~ f + .r~r• ~ ~ , L ,r'~ ~ ~ 6 ~ : ' `~a.C fi+"sr'~,++~t~~r~~/~~s+4~ ~~rS~`a .+~.''"r.4 /"~`~15~ R~~. ~ ~w~.~'~ ~ r► r 'V•'. ~ . ~C-1..~ ~ ~ ~ dL• ~r _ - -+~~r . . _ Yf:._. ..ti. ~•J'~J.r.~. l.-... .+✓1....:,Cv. t'~ .~•_1 1'1►~ 1. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and an additional left turn lane on the anproach to Broaclway shall be required prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are com- pleted on the project site. Transition in width nay be required south of IIroadway Avenue. 2. The developer shall reir,iburse the County for the acquisition costs o.f the right-of-way required for said additional lanes. 3. The developer shall reimburse tlie County for the cost of construction of tne additional traffic lanes. 4. ihe developer shall reir.lburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improver►lents are completed. C. Broadway Avenue East of Sullivan to the East Property Line of the Project. l. Additional right-of-way shall be acquired by Spokane County to provide width adequate for two through lanes in each direction plus left turn lanes with a dual left turn lane at the principal entrance to the project. 2. The developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of acquiring ten feet of right-of- way on each side of Conklin Road tapering from Broadway Avenue South for one hundred f i f ty f ee t(15 0' ) to a point of zero wiclth. 3. Special traffic flow channelization shall be designated at both Moore and Conl;lin Road to prohibit direct access of the Valley Mall traffic into the residential areas. The Broadway improvement shall extend from Sullivan Road east through the Valley r4a11 Development with required tapers. An addi- tional friction lane may be required by the County from two hundred feet (200') east of Sullivan Road to Sullivan Road. . 4. Roadway improvements to IIroadway shall in- clude curbs and sidewalks on both the north and south sides of the street, and charinel- ization at the Sullivan Road intersection and the major entrance to the iUlall. 5. The developer shall reiriburse the County for the County's cost of right-of-way acquisition, if any, and improvement construction cost. 6. ~he foregoing improvements shall be completed as traffic conditions require. _g_ . ' "T •1~'M~~'~i!'Ar `ii~r~+~~.r ~ ~~~'y ~,~~Y•Z^ +►~l. ~ './S~~j~i~~~- Y' : • ~ ~ v..' - '~,~„~~lf ` rl '~•l~~`~~/1,'"wlt•r a~~ i ~ _J~y~y~~~yt'`` ~,,~y ~ L~li:~T'..~..~ r . ''4w- • 1't ~ • 'b , • • ~ ~.L~~,sr.l~~V' ^+~I"' ~~r+, j ~ St~1 ~ r _l:". l~ "~bl a/,► f,► 1 ~l'^~: ~ , - wr~^' ` ~ r^ r e'ti►., • _ . - ' f+ , ~ _r - . - ' r - , , , • . - • - . - • . . . . . n15. Traffic Signals - The developer's share of the cost of improver.ient or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be eomputed upon the percent of traffic yenerated by the Valley Itall or a s otherwi se noted : . Sullivan and Sprague Sullivan and Mission IIroadway and Flora Sullivan and Broadway Broadway and the major Valley tiall entrance (the total cost by the developer) 16. Future Participation Traffic generated by the Valley 14all nay necessitate the widening of Broadway Avenue from the Valley r1a11 development east to Flora Road and Flora Road frora Broadway south to Sprague. The f ull impact of the Val ley Pial1 cannot be determined at this time. However, the developer should be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections from future phases of the project warrant said improvements. 17. lhere shall be no direct vehicular access from ` this proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway Avenue except at the intersection of,the circular access roac3 as shown on the development plan sub- mitted with this application and approved by the County Engineer, or as approved by the County. 18. The development shall be served by Vera Water ancl , Power District. There shall be no private wells located on the site without the written authority ' of the purveyor. . 19. No building permits shall be issued until all water quality and wastewater discharge permits are obtained. 20. In the event the developer does not proceed with the developr.tent of the project site, the developer shall have no obligation for reimbursement to , Spokane County for any of the right-of-way and roadway inprovements, set forth in paragraph 19 (Right-of-Way and Roadway Improver.tents). DAlED this day of , 1979 v ~ ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOIJERS OF SPOKAIJE COUi•]TY, IIASHINGTON ~ ~ . AiTEST: VERiJON [l. OHLAIJD / •C er ~o the Boar ~ , - . By ' Deputy Clerk -10- L 1 ~ . T ~,..~/f~'!'rr.~..• ~"S✓.~~/" 1r~~.~1.2`../11+Lw~ ~Sr~4. ~.~li ~ K.' ~ ~„~~~'y',I~vs~~w..y~.l.+~~• r,.~,~C~. • .y..?jw~~',.p~.'.'~ p,~ 'I" ♦ ra 1"' • -~i~ . T^ i • f •w1' J! • ~~7 ~ r I!~~ ' ^ f+ Q1{~' ~~.T ,~.~~~A.lJ.~ , ~ , b,,~~ir~-~•~r~i~,iR~ t~~r i►~V?•~"y~'ti►.*r'-1r -+--p r,+ ~/~i~~+/ r6'"c,+_~. ~ ~ . L 'v_t . r_ ~ • . . L ~:'.s `i. r ~ Y.'~ _iC• ' L~~~~,•,y~ ~ly ~ l.~,.~~~:, :vw...1 ~:.`.,J6.~.7~,G. J f. r~...~ w ~ A _ /`"0'''`."~+.` .n ^ ♦ - r ,J~~Ii 1 79 1001 BOARD OF COUiJTY COAUMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASIiIIJGTON FINDIiJGS AND ORDER REGARDING: ZE-142-77, AGRICULTURAL TO COr1NiERCIAL, Known as Valley a9a11 - WHEREAS, The Spokane County I`lanning Commission did, after public hearing on September 22 and 28, 1978, forward to the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation that the Zoning ilap (be) changed from the existing Agricultural classification to the Cornmercial classification on property described as follows: Section, 13, Township 25r1, Range 44, E.W.ti. PARCEL A: That part of the Sli 1/4 of Section 13 described as follows: Beginning at a point 20 feet h and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said Section 13, which is the true POB; thence N along the E side of County road 649.32'; 1/4 of said Section 13; thence S 89°37' E 504.3'; thence S 649.32'; thence S 89°51' [a along the v line of County road 530.3' more or less to the POB. PARCEL II: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of Section 13-25-44; thence S 89°51' E along the iJ line of County road 540.3' to the true POII; thence N 1,305.25' to a point; thence S 89°57' E 519.36' to a point; thence 0°3 1/4' ta 1,306.121 to a point on the ri line of County road; thence 14 89°S1' Z9 along said I1 line of County road 518.08' to the POB. PARCEL C: Part of the S 1/2 of the 11W 1/9 of Section 13-25-44 described as follows: Beginning 20 feet 1.1 and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said section; thence S 89°51' E along the 11 line of Broadway Road No. 493 for 1,058.38' to the true POE; thence Id 0°03 1/2' E 1,306.121to the tJ line of the S 1/2 of the 14 1/2 of said section; thence S 89°57' E along the N line 519.36'; thence S 0°07' 1•7 1,306.99' to the N line of said road; thence 14 89 ° 51' 14 along the I1 line 510.631 to the true POB, excepting that part of the r/w of PSIi r1o. 2. ALSO, that portion of the S 1/2 of the II 1/2 of Section 13-25-44 lying Sly of the Sly line of PSIi i1o. 2, described as follows : FARCEL D: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the W 1/2 corner of said Section 13, and running thence S89°51' E, along the IJ line of Broadway Avenue 2,612.62' to the true POB of the tract of land herein described; thence rI 0°14' E 1,303.73'; thence S 89°51' E 519.36'; thence S 0°17 1j2' t•d 1,309.60' to a point on the N line of saic3 Broadway Avenue; thence 11 89°51' W along said IIroadway Avenue 513.08' to the POB, except the r/w conveyed to Spokane Valley Irrigation Co.; and except the . E 200' thereof conveyed to Highway Chapel, Inc. PARCEL E: IIeginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said Section 13 and running thence S 89°51' E, along the I] line of IIroadway Avenue, 1,576.96 feet ~ l ~ .~~~'~'d~~~j~ ~+~qA."~►r ~,•~~:Y~tir'~'~,"'~`+~''ffto jA1* ,•rr~f~-`, ~~`L~,~ ~~cr:.I~ ~ r'_ y.' \ ~ A f f~P~~.r' ;~Y ~t.I_p.~l•~..: 1~ '~q~-~ v,.~• 'S~ t t r~- r.'' ~ "'..i. ~ ^ ~''Y~ J, 1.~~ . . i► 4 ~ A I~ 4a1 ..~•1 rC a ~ :n : ~ . . . 1 . . _ : L.. : : a , the use of Broadway Avenue west of Sullivan P.oad in order to prevent adverse effects on Frogress School; provided, however, that this restriction shall not apply during the summer months when the Progress School is not in session. 3. riechanical systems such as heating, sewage facilities and air conditioning units shall be desicrned to abate ' noise by utilizing sound and sight baffles. 4. Other than as may be permitted for illuminated signs, "down lighting" shall be installed so that no light- ing within the mall property extends beyond the site. Footpath illuminations shall be installed along pedestrian ways. 5. A reasonable area for corinuter parking shall be incorporated into the mall including an area desig- nated for bus loading and unloading. The size and location thereof shall be determined by the Spokane County Planning Director, subject to final approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 6. Facilities for bicycle usage shall be developed including areas where bicycles can be secured. 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Department plans for pedestrian and bicycle lanes. 8. The following energy-conservation measures shall be incorporated in the actual construction of the mall to improve the energy efficiency thereof: - (a) Building orientation and design details for • r.iaxir.ium solar efficiency; (b) Use of landscaped earth berming along exterior " walls and reduction of window area; (c) Use of tinted glass, double glass or thermal glass in windows; , (d) Use of roof overhang or rolladen-type sunscreens in glassed areas; (e) Insulation in roof, ceilings and walls; (f) Use of high performance heating and cooling units; (g) Primary use of fluorescent rather than incandes- cent lights, except for design accent purposes. -2- ~t ~ . ~ ' . ~i _ ''~.~Klw~lKyr~V~iir~,'~ ' ~.~t~ • , r~''./~~b~~ .`I~~~'i.~~ ~1'1~'~t~~~.~~~,~MA'rr~•r~~1/~~.~►~rt'~~ ~ ' ri ~ ~ ~`~~'T!"~~ y~.~. ^~~a ~r~~~,.~~►~~ _ ' t /~,ylr~'~r~;~,y+ ~r~~T~'~v~*~~~`pjy~ ~p,r~ iJ, ^ . ..r~ . v ~ «w~ ~ J ' . ~ v q~` . ~..a' `i ~•`~•`~~w''`"~~`-`^r~ . t~~~ : ~i`r ~N'~~'~L.`e ./~'~`'..y ~~s..i <1~,,,~ = al-.r.'~ :`r'~r.'S^c'.`!-! ~ ~'Z'!K ~-a^r\.t 'ti...-\~'-'~' , , . FIIJUIP]GS - LOCATIOI4AL CRITERIA The IIoard of County Commissioners considered the site location as an integral part in reaching their decision. lhe Eoard hereby f inds the fol lowing : 1. ^he site is located adjacent to an interstate freeway to the north and adjacent to two highly traveled arterials on the south and west thereby limiting the prospective residential use of the property. 2. The proPerty owner to the east of the subject pro- perty has approved of tlie proposed use of said pro- perty for commercial use. 3. Zone Classifications: a. r]orth - Agricultural, 6/18/57 b. taest - Commercial, 3/9/78, 1969 and 1971 c. South - Agricultural, Two-Family Residential Family Residential, 3/27/42, 6/11/74 and 8/5/76 d. East - Agricultural, 3/27/92 Land Use : a. Site - Vacant. b. IJorth - Red Lion riotor Inn and Freeway. c. tlest - Cor,unercial business. d. South - Fire station and sinqle family residence. e. East - Vacant land and a church. 4. lhe noise levels emanating from the freeway and adjacent arterials restrict the use of the subjeGt property for residential use. ~ , 5. The site has a high degree of visual exposure. 6. The site was selected by the applicant based on market analysis as reported in the Environme,ntal Impact Statement (EIS). 7. ihe site size of 70 acres is between the recomr►ended size of 35 acres to 80 acres for a regional shopping mall. 8. Iiigh accessibility by auto or transit to the center is a prime essential for site selection for a regional shopping center and the subject site is so situated. 9. The site is near a populated area and in an area that is growing rapidly. lhe Spokane County population forecast by SrIAIS is 334,000 for 1985, 352,000 for 1990 anc3 386,000 for the year 2000. In adc3ition, a report entitled "Design PoPulation Update for -3- . / ,~i►'4~ 1..~~ '4 ' ~~`,~I"C"p' Ir'y'. i" h' ~~J'` ' C'./►,~` ~ r' ►'K f~~/'..~fs~ A'~ T`y",►'~1'.a~.'N • r -"~~}~~!!~~iRt ~+'i~ j• _b ~ar~" lr~Y!'~~+~ y,~.~/` .~~",`tr~- ~ . ✓~o , • . 4 - • ~ ti~ ~ ~ R' r • ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~~►~~j~j f,\ • r/~ ~~/La! ~ _ _ r, . _ ,.a.` . _.r_ . s. 'O.r► ~r » ✓a~~.:x.~a. ••a- ~ l~:~•. s . ' , c Spokane County Comprehensive Plan - Idovember 1978" has a design population for the Spokane 14etropolitan area of an additional 70,000 people by the year 2000. 10. Tize Spokane Valley area east of the City of Spokane is a rapiclly-growing area which is not served by a regional shopping center. The said Spokane Valley area is in need of a regional shopping center to serve tlie residents ttiereof and to avoid the requirement for said resicients travelling substantial distances to existing shopping areas with commensurate expenditures , of energy. 11. The site for a regional center should be located near freeway off-raraps and the subject site is to situated. 12. The site is a continuous parcel and is not separated by any roads, streets, or other physical barriers. 13. In approving this zone change, the Board has con- sidered other possible locations for a regional shopping center in the Spokane Valley. 14, lhe Board finds the following favorable site conditions: (a) Accessibility (b) Continuous parcel (one-piece ) (c) Sufficient site area for expansion and buffering (d) ;1o grading problems (e) Close to expanding residential areas (f) The development of the site will not result in the disruption of environmentally sensi,tive f lora or f auna . , FINDINGS - ECONOMIC CRITERIA In their deliberation the Board evaluated the economic viability of a regional center for this location. ihe following criteria were found to exist: 1. ri"he area surrounding the proposed developr.lent presents favorable market and economic conditions. 2. llepartment stores with consuner acceptance will be the key to insure the center's economic vitality. The applicant has designed the mall to include four development stores. 3. The Board finds that a regional shopping center will not unduly affect the City of Spokane's Central Business District. - t~ - . ••r `..~'"11~'~'"~'~'~`3'!"~~'~, '~~+y',~' L ~~~`''~1'',jti~~''' ~.~`'~t~"` " J' ~~'J~~..~.,'~' V►~'~/"""jr~•-+^.~~►~,•i r' ► , r fj~ ~i~'ti ~ ' ~-!~`1~~ ~ ~.r,~lC!~~'... . - 1.-~ 7t~i~~-y~ ~r y~"~`~'~'f /i. • ~ T ~✓'f~ ~ . ti~ ~ ~t~'P T~M't- ~ ~J+~~+- ~y ~ - 'Y ' "i~A _ r ~t~r c~'i,rr ~l~'.~ y"'`. : ..,y.. f. .a - .[1 J.-~ 't\ . ~s n: a+~ " ~-.wr T .L !-t rl►Rva~ fi._ L' . ..l~ ♦ r ~ •Yr ~ ~c~''Q.y,l~ . ~ r 4. The 13oard further finds that this proposal is consi c3erec3 an expansion to the suburbs and not a decentralization of the central city. The IIoard finds that the real and viable resources of downtown Spokane are: (a) The masses of people such as shoppers, office workers, and taurists. (b) Of f ices, banks, etc. (c) Public services. (d) Government. (e) Cultural resources. 5. The IIoard finds that there may be a slight impact on existing shopping centers. However, these centers will need to be strengthened by providing new businesses, parking facilities, and other public con- venience arnenities. 6. The Board finds that the location of the Valley liall will assist in making mass transit more viable not only for shoppers, but for commuter traffic to downtown Spokane. Both the Valley t1a11 and downtown Spokane will compliment mass transit purposes. 7. The developrr.ent of a regional shopping mall on the subject property will increase competition between all shopping centers, including the City of Spokane Central Business District, to the benefit of consumers. FINDINGS - DESIGN CRI"L'EP.IA The IIoard finds that the design of this development will provide a pleasant shopping environment. The following design considerations are noted: l. The proposal contains a continuous interior peripheral roadway within the site to minimize the traffic impact upon the surrounding areas. 2. Efficient parking configuration. 3. Clustering of stores in a mall-like setting. 4. The erection of a landscaped earthen berm to buffer the area to the south. 5. Providing shoppers' comfort and climate control. 6. Cther design eonsiderations noted are: (a) Freedom from congestion (b) Ample off-street parking (c) Convenient access -5- . ~ . , ~^~,~/•~c~',..~~"~; v~ r~,/.,y►~/r~..~.~'~.✓ yv~•.+;J'`~.~:~ `i ; ' -~';+~'S~T~ ~<.~•,"~Vt`, n~?~-~.~%~, _ ~ } 's - '1 - ~~.f~~.I ~..w~~ ~ ~y' ` ~`~1/'..~~. ' ^~,~~,l•ir~ ' j~ ~ I "+r ' ~I ~ ~r~ . r ~ ♦ ~ . ..I ~ 1. ,1., ~ M ..r .wi ~.~J_.... x . 1 r.. « . _a/' i T f_ .I'~' ~.`^4' - ~ .i> - a+. ~~4 ..Y. ; ~ r• • r. _ ~ r/,+►~~. 4 Y _ _ _ - (d) Ef f icient mass transit (e) Attractive modern buildings (f) Easy circulation (g) Cultural amenities (h) Convenient access between businesses within the mall. 7. This proposal offers a clustering of stores which will enhance customers' convenience, unlike many of the existing shopping centers which are simply "strip centers", i.e., a connection of stores with front door parking and where pedestrian access is, for the most part, from the outside. 8. The parking has been designed to eliminate hazardous , conflicts with pedestrians walking frortt parking spaces to stores and vice versa. ORDER - CONDITZOPJS FOR APPROVAL - VALLEY ~i11LL 1. ';'he decision of the Spokane County Planning Commission • is hereby affirmed and the appeal therefrom is hereby denied, subject to the terms and conditions of this Order. 2. lhe developer shall comply with all of the rules and regulations of the Spokane County Iiealth District and other pertinent local and state regulatory agencies of jurisdiction as they exist at the time of construc- tion. All necessary liealth District permits shall be obtained prior to issuance of buildinq permits. Sew- age collection and disposal facilities shall be de- signed so as to facilitate interception to a general sewer system and must be approved by the County- ' Utilities Department. 3. Any sewage treatment facilities shall be located at least five hundred feet (500') from existing resi- dences along Broadway Avenue to the south of the ' subject property. Fencing, screening, and Iandscaping of such facilities may be required by the Planning Department after submission of development plans. The sewage treatment facilities must be maintained and operated by an operator certified by the State of Washington. 4. Fire mains and hyc3rants shall be installed in accordance with Spokane County Fire t•larshal's ' requirements. Approva3 of all other fire plans by the Fire Marshal shall be obtained prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. The sponsor shall develop the property generally in accordance with the concept presented to the Spokane County Planning Commission. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator after coordination with other regulatory agencies, will be permitted including, but not limited to the following changes: building location; building -6- ~ .ir~ ~ - ~~.J, ~1 y:`~...~ . f - .a ~ ~wV~i~F ►'-;1"'•~~. t"~'' ~`~►~•w/~•`~ ..1."•f! ~ • Cw. y. ~ 1 y'`~~~~► ~i' . • • "6 • ` • ~V~ ' ~~~J~ ~,~v • ^ ~ ' ~ ' ~b-• ' . --P. _ r~d y ~ y ;..~'„~~'+'''~,.~~ri*~~~~ JJ'.I- ~I' !'~/~'~Y..~~~•~ w 1l~1'~. -~~~V•~~ tK-.'~1~ p.~ . • h . 1: T ~ I j d~, ..~1 r ~ ~ ~ / . ~ ..Ji... ~ It'C...: ~ ~t , •,naterials; building sizes; area coverage; landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. 1111 variations must conform to reyulations , set forth in the Spokane County ?.oning Orciinancc. The original intent of developing a regional shopping mall shall be maintained. 6.• In the event substantial development (the construction of the mall) of the subject property in accordance with the development plan has not commenced by October 1, 1985, then and in that event a hearing may be held by the Hearing L'xaminer Committee to con- sider either a time extension or changing the zone classification back to Aqricultural. 7. If regulations emanating from the Snokane "208" I•7ater Quality 14anagement Program are in effect at the time of building permit submission, the developer shall comply with all such rules, regulations or guidelines for the protection of the aquifer. Valley Mall development plans shall incorporate "208" Program recommendation concepts, as adoptecl by the IIoard of County Comnissioners, subject to review approval by the Planning llirector. Any operations within the site which proposes to store, use, handle or dispose of "critical substances" as defined by the "20II" Program shall be subject to review and approval by the County Planning Director. 8. A surface water runoff management plan shall be pre- pared by the Developer, meeting the approval of the - County Engineer. The plan shall maximize disposal-of _ runoff waters through grassed percolation area and , minimize collection to dry well disposal. ihe land- scaping plan hereinafter required shall incorporate . such drainag,e disposal concepts. 9. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. 14. The landscape and berming plan shall show specific detail, including ground cover and shrubs and be accompanied by a performance bond or other acceptable security in an amount to be approved by the Spokane County ""oning Ac?ministrator prior to the issuance of building permits. The bond shall guarantee the naintenance of the landscaping for a period of two years af ter completion of the landscaping. Instal- lations of an automatic sprinkler system shall be required. 11. Berming and landscaping shall be erected co „ ensurate with the phased construction on the subject property. As construction cor,unences on the project, an eight (8) foot undulating berm along IIroadway shall progress therewith so tllat berming will be in place a distance east on Broadway one hunclred feet (100') beyond the easterly boundary of the ongoing phase. -7- T ~ , • ~ y • _ . ,,,,,r • ~ w►~ 'r '~,`''t4+ry~~~.~;~`~c~`~: - . i' ~,p~ ~ ~/~1"''/~~„~•V~V'~iq'~~~, t~'+ 1/~. r~~"~;.~~' ' 7 ~ ~j ~ _k v ..-v '.~`J . w~ r "r► ^y..~+T~~ •M rT'~"'~I~~~-, w' `1~~4 ~~'y~~ ~''''V►+/r r ~7~'fA" • w M. „rdr.A~r ► r • ~1 • ♦ ~ j ~`-`a ~'f• ~f~~~' ~ 1J ~r~ ~"~`y' • ~ . ! ~ , v l ~ . v .q - ~ y1 ..r- « e.,ti-a i ~ t"` ♦ J ~ ♦ ~ = . ~ .X . ~ • ~ ...~`'~it , +V , , . 12, Wherc! needed, barr~ers shall be erected along pro-- perty lines to contain blvwing debris caused by prevailing winds. The location and type of materials used therefor shalYIiie approved by the Zoning Admini. s tra tar prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The owners and tenants of the property sha1l form an association to-insure maintenance and up}keep vf the fvllowing : A11 on-site facilities, including, but not lirnit- ed tu: landscaping; sewage disposal; lighting: snaw remova 1; debris remova 1; parking area maintenance including str-lping and lane markers; and other required facility and/or rnechanical equipment, 14. night-of-Way and Roadway Impravements. A. Sullivan Road from Broadway to Sprague Avenue. 1. Spokane County had pre-exi sting plans for building a four-lane road~~y within existing right-af-way. The County presently awns the right-vf-way for said project. 2, Spokane County will proceed with the construc- tion af ~ ~ive-lane roadway frvm Sprague to Braadway including acquisitian of additional right-of--way required for the fifth lane; Spokane Caunty sha1l fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the . developer as hereinafter specified. I F ' 3. Th~ ~eveloper shall reimburse Spokane Caunty - - for the cost of ric~ht-of-way r6quirec7 for said fiftri lane and likewise shall reirnburse Spokane County for the cost of construction ❑f the fifth lane. 4. For each square foot of building cornpleted on the project site, the cleveloper shall reimburse the County one eight hundred thousandth vf the above stated reimburseable costs. All reimbuzsable costs shall be paid by the developer in f ull upvn cvxngletian of 500,000 square feet of buildings uporn the project site. 5, In the event the developer does nvt prviceed r W1th the development of the project site, the , developer shall have na abligativn for reimbursement to Spokane Caunty. , H. Sullivan Raad from Broad~ay Avenue tv State of tdashington's SoutM Right-of-ilay Line for Highway I-90. _3- A~,,~~~ . sc Irb"y~~• ,r '.Xe+\r~""*~ A` . ' ~ • . 4' . _ _ _ ]4# • • ,f ,FC. ~ ~ '1~ .A - R d !L 1. It is aareed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and an additional left turn lanc on the anproach to Broaclway shall ue requirECl prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are com- pleted on the project site. Transition in caidth may be required south of IIroadway Avenue. 2. The developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs of the right-of-way required for said additional lanes. 3. The neveloper shall reirnburse tlie County for the cost of construction of tne additional traffic lanes. 4. ^she developer shall reiriburse the County for the above-described costs when said road improverients are completed. C. Broadway Avenue East of Sullivan to the East Property Line of the Project. l. Additional right-of-way shall be acquired by Spokane County to provide width adequate for two through lanes in each direction plus left turn lanes with a dual lef t turn lane at the principal entrance to the project. 2. The developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of acquiring ten feet of right-of- way on each side of Conklin Road tapering from Broadway Avenue South for one hundred f i f ty feet (150' ) to a point of zero width. 3. Special traffic flow channelization shall be designated at both Moore and Conklin Road to prohibit direct access of the Valley Mall traffic into the residential areas. The Broadway improvement shall extend from Sullivan Road east through the Valley ?4a11 Development with required tapers. An addi- tional friction lane may be required by the County from two hundred feet (200') east of Sullivan Road to Sullivan Road. 4. Roadway improvements to IIroadway shall in- clude curbs and sidewalks on both the north and south sides of the street, and channel- ization at the Sullivan Road intersection and the major entrance to the Uiall. 5. The developer shall reir►iburse the County for the County's cost of right-of-way acquisition, if any, and improvement construction cost. 6. ihe foregoing improvements shall be completed as traffic conditions require. -9- pl" ! . ~ . ~ yyy Y 1 /y!~~►'~.~' J~1. '}}1,~-Vr- ; "~•~P~." ~r . ~'r"Y'-~i~/}~'l~''~~ ! ~7~~~~~ . ~ ` ~i,.~ ~ n/' ~ ~~T J ~ ~ ~~1 ~ ~ ~y,~ ~ ~ ~ • w. ~ • s ► • s ► 1Y ~i . ~'1r ~ . e, . ~ . ~A.+, ~ .l~tS,r..d,/"i"~ V ►M~~►!"'„rr,.~~'~Sw` 1, ~ ~„J ; ; ^l''r, ,~!'-j, 1 T~.. - : .J -...b•. - ~ r, ~ ~ ~ ` ~'t 1~: ' . I . ~ A , y. . R - ' . • ' - 15. Traffic Signals - The developer's share of the cost of improver.ient or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be computed upon the percent of traffic yenerated by the Valley Iiall or as otherwise noted: _ Sullivan and Sprague- Sullivan and Mission ' Broadw•ay and Flora Sullivan and Broadway Broadway and the major Valley !lall entrance . (the total cost by the developer) 16. Future Participation Traffic generatea by the Valley 14all nay necessitate the widening of Broadway Avenue from the Valley riall development east to Flora Road and Flora Road fror.t Broadway south to Sprague. The full impact of the Valley Piall , cannot be determined at this time. IIowever, the developer should be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections from future phases of the project warrant said improvements. 17. lhere shall be no direct vehicular access from this proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway Avenue except at the intersection of the circular access roaa as shown on the development plan sub- mitted with this application and approved by the County Engineer, or as approved by the County. 18. The development shall be served by Vera Water and , Power District. There shall be no private wells located on the site without the written authority of the purveyor. 19. No builcling permits shall be issued until all water quality and wastewater discharge permits are obtained. 20. In the event the developer does not proceed with the developr.lent of the project site, the developer shall have no obligation for reimbursement to , Spokane County for any of the right-of-way and roadway inprovements, set forth in paragraph 14 (Right-of-Way and Roadway Improvements). DATED this day of , 1979 v - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOIJERS► , OF SPOKAIJE COUI•ITY, WASHItJGION ~ ATTEST: ~ VERIJON 11. O FILAIJD / 2 • •C er ~o the Boar ooe - By ~ ~~j~•~~,Q ~ Deputy Clerk -10- ~ . } . ~ " nYl/_ ~~~Gj /1,t•~-1,~„ • ~ ,y•c A Jp~',~r~ ~r.RL,Iy;,{`,~; ; ,..,~n~~-.1-/Q " ,t~,N..~1~.-, 'i"~ r~~~~' ~ ♦ 1W • JO' ~'~1 ~ ~~v1 ♦►ti,Jj~V • y~ ~ •r^I f ~r i ~~i~JI'~~ /►'T~'~ J . ~w~~f, ' ~j~~ ,f. ~ 1 ~ ~~A. r, r ~ 1 .Y~ ~ ` ~ /V,~►~~•~,~~'`~~~~i . J I 1. . J ~ _ . ~ _ aa, t - . ~.Y . . ~ w ~ ,'"~A . \ 'i~ +..1 ..r i+J~.q•,• Y1'.P", r r.y-~►- • i; ; . 'i~ 10(3t BOARD OF COUTJTY COM1ISSIOr]ERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASTiIIJGTON FINDIiJGS AND ORDER REGARDING: ZE-142-77, AGRICULTURAL TO COTSNiERCIAL, hnown as Valley ?gall • IIHEREAS, The Spokane County rlanning Commission did, af ter public hearing on September 22 and 28, 1978, forward to the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation that the Zoning 14ap (be) changed trom the existing Agricultural classification to the Commercial classification on property described as follows: Section, 13, Township 25N, Range 44, E.W.11. PARCEL A: shat part of the Si9 1/4 of Section 13 described as follows: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the « 1/4 corner of said Section 13, which is the true POB; thence I1 along the E side of County road 649.321; 1/4 of said Section 13; thence S 89°37' E 504.3'; thence S 649.32'; thence S 89°51' 14 along the v line of County road 530.3' more or less to the POB. PARCEL n: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet D of the W 1/4 corner of Section 13-25-44; thence S 89°51' E along the i3 line of County road 540.3' to the true POII; thence I3 1,305.25' to a point; thence S 89°57' E 519.36' to a point; thence 0°3 1/4' 17 1,306.121 to a point on the 11 line of County road; thence 14 89°51' cV along said i1 line of County road 518.08' to the POB. PARCEL C: Part of the S 1/2 of the 2*J 1/9 of Section 13-25-49 described as follows: IIeginning 20 feet 11 and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said section; thence S 89°51' E along the 17 line of Broadway Road No. 443 for 1,058.30' to the true POE; thence U 0°03 1/2' E 1, 306.12'to the 14 line of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of said section; thence S 89057' E along the N line 519.361; thence S 0°07' 17 1,306.99' to the N line of said road; thence 1-1 89°51' 11 along the N line 510.63' to the true POB, e:ccepting that part of the r/w of PSIi r3o. 2. ALSO, that portion of the S 1/2 of the II 1/2 of Section 13-25-44 lying Sly of the Sly line of PSIi I1o. 2, described as follows : FARCEL D: Beginning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the 11 1/2 corner of said Section 13, and running thence S 89°51' E, along the IJ line of Broadway Avenue 2,612.62' to the true POB of the tract of land herein described; thence 11 0°14' E 1,303.73; thence S 89°51' E 519.361; thence S 0°17 1/2' I7 1,309.60' to a point on the N line of said Broadway Avenue; thence 14 89°51' W along said nroadway Avenue 513.08' to the POB, except the r/w conveyed to Spokane Valley Irrigation Co.; and except the E 200' thereof conveyed to Highway ChaPel, Inc. PARCLL E: neoinning at a point 20 feet N and 30 feet E of the W 1/4 corner of said Section 13 and running thence S 89°51' E, along the 14 line of BroadtiTay Avenue, 1,576.46 feet ' ~ : ...1`;.~~~'.'a''°~ :L•~:.%-~`'~'','a',,~'`y~, ~,.~r-'t"'~~~ ~~''0~''~ ,~+~,ti.f,.,w,t1~ ~ . . • l'~'' ^~~~"r~~,;, w"w~i° 1~,`r•r .~~}r/~. ~ r~ ►.►~'~r.: r.~r V` f+VLl~ i~r 'i~r . r . h~-.• • r • .l► ~ • • ~ ' ? ~ r~ ♦ r w~' , `.~N 1 i~ r ~r ~ ~ ~r1~ ~ ' i. r..i _ r.,~' ~ . r - ~ : ,r . v c . JV- , the use of Broadway Avenue west of Sullivan P.oad in order to prevent adverse effects on Frogress School; nrovic3ed, however, that this restriction shall not apply during the summer months when the Progress School is not in session. 3. riechanical systems such as heating, sewage facilities and air conditioning units shall be desioned to abate noise by utilizing sound and sight baffles. 4. Other than as may be permitted for illuminated signs, "down lightinq" shall be installed so that no light- ing within the mall property extends beyond the site. Footpath illuminations shall be installed along pedestrian ways. 5. A reasonable area for comnuter parking shall be incorporated into the mall including an area desig- nated for bus loading and unloading. The size and location thereof shall be determined by the Spokane County Planning Director, subject to final approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 6. Facilities for bicycle usage shall be developed including areas where bicycles can be secured. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall subnit to the Planning Department plans for pedestrian and bicycle lanes. 8. The following energy-conservation measures shall be incorporated in the actual construction of the mall ta improve the energy efficiency thereof: (a) Building orientation and design details for maximum solar ef f iciency; (b) Use of lanascaped earth berming along exterior walls and reduction of window area; (c) Use of tinted glass, double glass or thermal glass in windows; , (d) Use of roof overhang or rolladen-type sunscreens in glassed areas; (e) Insulation in roof, ceilings and walls; (f) Use of high performance heating and cooling units; (g) Primary use of fluorescent rather than incandes- cent lights, except for design accent purposes. _2_ . ~ . Y }i . t . 1'; .e"':/~ ♦ ~ R '~j'~'' ~ " ~ILL.ay{~~ ' : ~ ► 'Q~r'fI~"s^''~'- ~ ' 1 y . i`~_, ~%T "R~~►~ ~ ~ A~• ♦ 1.. . ~P rM r~.~ ' ~ • ~rA~ • ► / ' ~~4"~~y` ~riMMlrf"rI ` f'_~. 1~~,~,,1~'',~,~, , ^~v;►~ ~..s • ~';._j;:'~e~ .~c!12;~' , ~~►rd'+1i"'~ . ~~"»'y f~ ~1 ~ , ?~w✓r'• ~1 1~~'~~.ii ~~~~J` e~~ ~ M C~ . J~r~w i,~'~ t v ,x` R1" r1~ .=.r'~G' t ~'1.~. Z''t Z.r1~.~ • a' • 4y~ FII4UIP]GS - LOCATIOI4AL CRITERIA The Board of County Commissioners cpnsidered the site location as an integral part in reaching their decision. 1he Eoard hereby finds the following: 1. ^he site is located adjacent to an interstate freeway to the north and adjacent to two highly traveled arterials on the south and west thereby limiting the prospective residential use of the property. 2. The proPerty owner to the east of the subject pro- perty has approved of tlle proposed use of said pro- perty for commercial use. 3. Zone Classifications: a. ilorth - Agricultural, 6/18/57 b. laest - Commercial, 3/9/78, 1969 and 1971 c. South - Agricultural, Tcao-Family Residential Family Residential, 3/27/42, 6/11/70 and 3/S/76 d. East - Agricultural, 3/27/42 Land Use : a. Site - Vacant. b. tJorth - Red Lion riotor Inn and Freeway. c. tlest - Cor,unercial business. d. South - Fire station and sinqle family residence. e. East - Vacant land and a church. 4. lhe noise levels emanating from the freeway and adjacent arterials restrict the use of the subject property for residential use. 5. The site has a high degree of visual exposure. 6. The site was selected by the applicant based on market analysis as reported in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). 7. ihe site size of 70 acres is between the reconriended size of 35 acres to 80 acres for a regional shopping mall. 8. Iiigh accessibility by auto or transit to the center is a prime essential for site selection for a regional shopping center and the subject site is so situated. 9. The site is near a populated area and in an area that is growing rapidly. lhe Spokane County population forecast by SrsAlS is 334,000 for 1985, 352,000 for 1990 anc3 386,000 for the year 2000. In adc3ition, a report entitled "Design PoPulation Update for -3- : , ~ '~r ~"~4'~R~~~~~ `~],'`I'~''~I~~! h ~ • • lb ~ ~ r ~1'~~1.~/r~~._~- y:~`1L~,+,~~~ I'~ ..V .r ...wr7(►'lM' \ 1!` ~ "~i j~. I1~ ~7r . ` •r X r. ~ ~v~► ~.~~t~~d►. T.r~: K..1'~~~..•.''.s~I'~' .~~i1M.s ~~~+~~/'~'9+'~'~`~~'~~/~'t7^ y/~'~ j ~ `j"~ .~4l. A~Or~ ~ ~ 1~ t ~C.. . ' . . ..J . . 0.+~ .w..~ ~.I ~ J 7 ~ ~ ~✓~►~~.i.~C/.Ji► .ttL~ 1 r~,A. at ; . / • Spokane County Comprehensive Plan - IlovemUer 1978" has a design population for the Snokane Metropolitan area of an additional 70,000 people by the year 2000. 10. The Spokane Valley area east of the City of Spokane is a rapiclly-growing area which is not served by a regional shopping center. ihe said Spokane Valley area is in need of a regional shopping center to serve the residents tliereof and to avoid the requirement for said resicients travelling substantial distances to existing shopping areas with commensurate expenditures of energy. 11. The site for a regional center should be located near freeway off-rar.lps and the subject site is to situated. 12. The site is a continuous parcel and is not separated by any roads, streets, or other physical barriers. 13. In approving this zone change, the Board has con- sidered other possible locations for a regional shopping center in the Spokane Valley. 14. The Board finds the following favorable site conditions: (a) Accessibility (b) Continuous parcel (one-piece) (c) Sufficient site area for expansion and buffering (d) ;Jo grading problems (e) Close to expanding residential areas (f ) The development of the site will not result in the disruption of environmentally sensitive f lora or f auna . , FIIJDIIvGS - ECONOMIC CRITERIA In their deliberation the Board evaluated the economic viability of a regional center for this location. The following criteria were found to exist: 1. The area surrounding the proposed development presents favorable market and economic conditions. 2. llepartment stores with consuner acceptance will be the key to insure the center's economic vitality. The applicant has designed the mall to include four development stores. 3. ''i'he Board finds that a regional shopping center will not unduly affect the City of Spokane's Central Business District. -4- . . ++~,`w~'ti?~'7v+"'~~.~~ f'~,'Vy!'►:.'~'r+°~` .~1i''~/''Y' ~'*./~'v-'t'^;~!'~•L :d V~''~~'"'`' ~ -w~.."~/~ ~f`.1~..'f''+~~ -~~~~C,,A~" ~ 1..' 1,,,'~;•_~ * ,r ~7 .~►J'`~Y ,Y~ /~`.~i ~f►~.L • - 1/- ~1i~y~'1~• r.,..~• ^~C~ ~..i.~ ~ Vr►~~'~r,,'\"q\1., i r J(~' i,r'~''~...► ~ ~L,.tr. 7`.r.~41!' ~~.'°-v Y .T`" r • .~.1'~ A . -n '1. ` T..It~^P• a4~~7 _ ^ 1"'~ . ~i ~l ~~`.~..Y ~ r'^.. ! l... a- _ . .G ~ . ~c - c '1.`L 'cM l_r-+ ✓ L"'` . ~ : 4. ihe lsoard further finds that this proposal is . considered an expansion to the suburbs and not a dece,itralization of the central city. Tlle IIoard f inds that the rea 1 and viable resources of downtown Spokane are: (a) The masses of people such as shoppers, office workers, and tourists. (b) Offices, banks, etc. (c) Public services. (d) Government. (e) Cultural resources. 5. The IIoard finds that there may be a slight impact on existing shopping centers. However, these centers will need to be strengthened by providing new businesses, parking facilities, and other public con- venience arnenities. 6. lhe Board finds that the location of the Valley Piall will assist in making mass transit more viable not only for shoppers, but for commuter traffic to downtown Spokane. Both the Valley tiall and downtown Spokane will compliment mass transit purposes. 7. The developrr.ent of a regional shopping mall on the subject property will increase competition between all shopping centers, including the City of Spokane Central Business District, to the benefit of consur,►ers. FINDINGS - DESIGN CRImEP.IA The IIoard finds that the design of this development will provide a pleasant shopping environment. ihe following design considerations are noted: 1. The proposal contains a continuous interior peripheral roadway within the site to minimize the traffic impact upon the surrounding areas. 2. Efficient parking configuration. 3. Clustering of stores in a mall-like setting. 4. The erection of a landscaped earthen berm to buffer the area to the south. 5. Providing shoppers' comfort and climate control. 6. 'Cther design considerations notecl are: (a) Freedom from congestion (b) Ariple off-street parking (c) Convenient access -5- . , . , ~ w L~' ~ .t ~ ~lij11...' ~1. C ~`rI . ` 1 ~ y \ A 'L~ •,J i ` ► t J~ ' • r ',~i~',I~o-I~..\4~'-'`► ''l✓,,~;v,.~~,'~►rIf'~`'~. ,+•./v,,,l•~`+4~+ ~ / ~i ~t+~'~=,r ~ v`'~_1+,Ir~'`,~y '~~``^~,.T~±;.iR• I~ ♦ e'" ~~V,`'`~s-'-~:'fi'V ~«4 " • ~ -%~L~-~ ' .r~~~~~-.-L-M~''~:ti-' ..r. • • w 1..••~~ . , ~'~rj:1 S~~►_lj~"i'~"''rq/' ~.r 1 H t'`V ~ ~ w• . ~ ` "'i' `l/ ` ~ 1~_ c.d ~`..I-.~. 't ✓_v- ~ ~ . 1 ~+.I~].~~_ • r ~ t'~.I'~'_✓,.-a• _'t. 'A -v. ~C,~. ! _ .±r_r. ~ .wr~ _ ~ ••r ~ _ , (d) Efficient mass transit (e) Attractive modern buildings (f) E-asy circulation (g) Cultural amenities (h) Convenient access between businesses within the mall. 7. This proposal offers a clustering of stores which will enhance customers' convenience, unlike many of the existing shopping centers which are simply "strip centers", i.e., a connection of stores with front door parking and where pedestrian access is, for the most part, from the outside. 8. The parking has been designed to eliminate hazardous conflicts with pedestrians walking from parking spaces to stores and vice versa. ORDER CONDITIOiJS FOR APPROVAL - VALLEY M11LL 1. The decision of the Spokane County Planning Commission is hereby affirmed and the appeal therefrom is hereby denied, subject to the terms and conditions of this Order. 2. The developer shall comply with all of the rules and regulations of the Spokane County Iiealth District and other pertinent local and state regulatory agencies of jurisdiction as they exist at the time of construc- tion. All necessary Iiealth District permits shall be obtained prior to issuance of buildinq permits. Sew- age collection and disposal facilities shall be de- signed so as to facilitate interception to a general sewer system and must be approved by the County Utilities Department. 3. Any sewage treatment facilities shall be located at least five hundred feet (504') from existing resi- dences along Broadway Avenue to the south of the subject property. Fencing, screening, and landscaping of such facilities may be renuired by the Planning Department after submission of development plans. The sewage treatment facilities must be maintained and operated by an operator certified by the State of Washington. 4. Fire mains and hyclrants shall be installed in accordance with Spokane County Fire i•larshal's • requirements. Approval of all other fire plans by the Fire Marshal shall be obtained prior to the issuance of any building permits. 5. The sponsor shall develop the property generally in accordance with the concept presented to the Spokane County Planning Commission. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator after coordination with other regulatory agencies, will be permitted including, but not limited to the following changes: building location; building -6- ! • - ~ - .4~1 . _ ,r.~ ~ti r.- ; •►.r.!'~. Z'-•►•~ ` 'rC wl' f " ~v~'S~'~ ~~~~~Y ~rl~~~}~ " ' ~ ~ ~ • A,~~J ' ' ~"M'~/~' . . ~ ' , ~soj~~~~,~. ..w. Y ..~_b. ~ ..I. ~ ~.►,~Y'i'"l~'^~i,"~li.'~ ~~./~.i~I'l-'/v~My~~~,`= ~~~.'~~K!'~~.• +t~~'+ i/'v a a • r~- ~ / ~ . • ~ ..l` o /L..~ a , 1! w ; . ' materials; building sizes; area coverage; landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the pernitted zone. 1111 variations must conform to reyulations set forth in the Spokane County loning Ordinailcc. The original intent of developing a regional shopping mall shall be maintained. 6.• In the event substantial developraent (the construction of the mall) of the subject property in accordance with the development plan has not commenced by October 1, 1985, then and in that event a hearing may be held by the Hearing Examiner Committee to con- sider either a time extension or changing the zone classification back to Aqricultural. 7. If regulations emanating from the Snokane "208" [•later Quality 14anagement Program are in effect at the time of building permit submission, the developer shall coraply with all such rules, regulations or guidelines for the protection of the aquifer. Valley Mall development plans shall incorporate "208" Program recommendation concepts, as adopted by the IIoard of County Cor►umissioners, subject to review approval by the Planning llirector. Any operations within the site which proposes to store, use, handle or dispose of "critical substances" as defined by the "20II" Program shall be subject to review and approval by the County Planning Director. 8. A surface water runoff management plan shall be pre- pared by the Developer, meeting the approval of the County Engineer. The plan shall maximize disposal,of • runoff waters through grassed percolation area and minimize collection to dry well disposal. ihe land- scaping plan hereinafter required shall incorporate such drainage disposal concepts. 9. Interior drive«ays and parking areas shall be paved. 10. 1'he landscape and berming plan shall show specific detail, including ground cover and shrubs and be accompanied by a performance bond or other acceptable security in an amount to be approved by the Spokane County ""oning Ac?ministrator prior to the issuance of building permits. The bond shall guarantee the naintenance of the landscaping for a period of two years after completion of the landscaping. Instal- lations of an automatic sprinkler system shall be required. 11. Berming and landscaping shall be erected co „ ensurate with the pr►ased construction on the subject property. As construction cor,imences on the project, an eight (8) foot undulating berm along IIroadway shall progress therewith so tllat berming will be in place a distance east on Broadway one hundred feet (100') beyond the easterly boundary of the ongoing phase. -7- . ~ . ~ _ ~~,,,L,,,_ , ~ : ,,,,~,E!' - ,r.,~,.,it; ~,.~~._S.~-~.;,,~.,-'-~y "'J" •i~,,•,,w~W,',~i~1~ ~'ya. , , ti . ~fL ,yy M I ti ^ ~ 1 ~~P✓•*I~ ~ ~ M a^~~ ` 1 ► ~,~r► ✓ j3~" .,`J....., .~i..A„:'~s..~'~'~; = ~ .~.~.Tl .t"r',.'..~. o~+~►: ~1.t-h~; r-~ t~•.•.~1. ~,e~^..,~`+-~,~.~► -~Y- , ~ j"^. rJ, r• ~ y w ♦ 'e, n~~ . ~ 1 , / ♦ R • . 1 ~ ' ~ ~ ♦ , v ~ 4 . "n.- ~,i . \ . ~ , i'^. C J^ . t • ♦ . I~.:•-.~. ~ .r~ r"" C • ~ti T^'-~r ~ ~.~f1~r ~ ~L+~~'"r V 12. Where needed, barriers shall be erected along pro- perty lines to contain blowing debris caused by prevailing winds. ilie location and type of materials used therefor shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator prior to the issuance of building permits. 13. The owners and tenants of the property shall form an association to insure maintenance and up-keep of the following: , (a) All on-site facilities, including, but not limit- ed to: landscaping; sewage disposal; lighting; snow removal; debris removal; parking area maintenance including striping and lane markers; and other required facility and/or mechanical equipnent. 14. Right-of-Way and Roadway Improvements. A. Sullivan Road from IIroadway to Sprague Avenue. 1. Spokane County had pre-existing plans for building a four-lane roadway within existing right-of-way. ihe County presently owns the right-of-way for said project. 2. Spokane County will proceed with the construc- tion of a five-lane roadway from Sprague to Broadway including acquisition of additional right-of-way required for the fifth lane. Spokane County shall fund the entire cost thereof, subject to reimbursement by the developer as hereinaf ter.specified. 3. The developer shall reiniburse Spokane County for the cost of right-of-way required for said fifth lane and likewise shall reimburse Spokane County for the cost of construction of the fifth lane. 4. For each square foot of building completed on the project site, the cleveloper shall reimburse the County one eight hundred thousandth of the above stated reimburseable costs. Al1 reimbursable costs shall be paid by the developer in full upon completion of 500,000 square feet of buildings upon the project site. 5. In the event the developer does not proceed , with the development of the project s=ite, the developer shall have no obligation for reimbursement to Spokane County. B. Sullivan Road from Broadway Avenue to State of Ilashington' s South Right-of -Ilay Line for Highway I-90. -3- • • 3 I .e"~, 'r"~; !w~.~► "Y'~ ~~~J'1~~ ~.r~ ~ ~+Q►~/ ~i" ''ti► ` - + f ~~rn~.~~~~1~!'A.~' ~ V'~`I~'r~~,1'~f~ ~~1~+~~1r+11~~~. -s~~',~,• ' , . . !''.r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~„~~,r,,,~~t~l.L y~i~,t~t.~/C~I~ri/ ~ `~~1"~ ..`~.e' ~ :e~~4. _ s-.. Y''~ n..=. ~ .C.r -~%.r'~`•• .rrf~IP~w^ C, ~ f-~a. `~r--~, j _ ,rr.r_~~ s/~...~ .~~Ci ~.~f~~ r.~' 1 /C'.A► ti~ ~ - - ' c" • - a~ . J . . . ~ ~ ~ 7~ _ 1 ~ _ - . l. It is agreed that two additional 12-foot wide traffic lanes and an additional left turn lanc on the approach to nroadway shall lie requirEd prior to the time that 500,000 square feet of buildings are com- pleted on the project site. Transition _ in width nay be required south of nroadway Avenue. 2. The developer shall reimburse the County for the acquisition costs o.f the right-of-way required for said additional lanes. 3. The developer shall reimburse tlie County for the cost of construction of tne additional traffic lanes. 4. s^he developer shall reir.►burse the County for the above-described costs when said road improvements are completed. C. Broadway Avenue East of Sullivan to the East Property Line of the Project. 1. Additional right-of-way shall be acquired by Spokane County to provide width adequate for two through lanes in each direction plus left turn lanes with a dual left turn lane at the principal entrance to the project. 2. The developer shall reimburse the County for the cost of acq uiring ten feet of right-of- way on each side of Conklin Road tapering from Broadway Avenue South for one hundred fifty feet (150' ) to a point of zera width. 3. Special traffic flow channelization shall be designated at both Moore and Conklin Road . to prohibit direct access of the Valley Mall traffic into the residential areas. The Broadway improvement shall extend from Sullivan Road east through the Valley riall Development with required tapers. An addi- tional friction lane may be required by the County from two hundred feet (2001) east of Sullivan Road to Sullivan Road. . 4. Roadway improvenents to Broadway shall in- clude curbs and sidewalks on both the north and south sides of the street, and channel- ization at the 3ullivan Road intersection and the major entrance to the iMall. 5. The developer shall reirtburse the County for the County's cost of right-of-way acquisition, if any, and improvement construction cost. 6. 'Lhe foregoing improvements shall be completed as traffic conditions require. -9- r h . S - ~ - ~ ,1~,y~ ,r ~ _ _ ~•r~. ~ .Mw - ',r~~. ;~r~ !~'~~*~,~„1.,.Z-~,, ~ '4~ ~ _ .~►r~,,'~;`~`1`'~.w ~'r-~ .~i '?,~7~` ~l~. /1~,~~ ~ rf'1o•~ t t ~!,...►~~b►..e~ V~.!«\.I~'~"/'ri.~,y\""t\.-`y', ~'~,~..~;'1' ; ~"'1~,...J'~'`J~, , I"~ : .a':. 1~~I'\ . tiM•. ~ - r,,~~r y"_~~ ~ ~ r . • 1 . Y . r f tr'.t/~.. 'h.y'•.- Y • / ' ` . ~ . . ' - f , _ .A , w 1•, ^ . ` _ • . fT. ' r , . . . ' ' • . • " t ° ~ - . 15. Traffic Siynals - The developer's share of the cost of improver.icnt or constructing traffic signals at the following intersections will be computed upon the percont of traffic generated by the Valley ?lall or as otherwise noted: Sullivan and Sprague Sullivan and Mission Broadway anc3 Flora Sullivan and Broadway 8roadway and the major Valley liall entrance (the total cost by the developer) 16. Future Participation Traffic generated by the Valley Mall may necessitate the widening of Broadway Avenue from the Valley A1a11 developr.►ent east to Flora Road and Flora Road from Broadway south to Sprague. The full impact of the Valley riall cannot be determined at this time. However, the developer should be prepared for future participation and sharing of construction costs, as determined by the County Engineer, for these two roads if traffic projections from future phases of the project warrant said improvements. 17. There shall be no direct vehicular access from this proposal onto Sullivan Road nor onto Broadway . Avenue except at the intersection of the circular access roaci as shown on the development plan sub- mitted with this application and approved by the County Engineer, or as approved by the County. 18. The development shall be served by Vera jJater and Power District. There shall be no private wells located on the site without the written authority of the purveyor. 19. Ivo building permits shall be issued until all water quality and wastewater discharge permits are obtained. 20. In the event the developer does not proceed with the development of the project site, the developer shall have no obligation for reimbursement to , Spokane County for any of the right-of-way and roadway inprovements, set forth in paragraph 14 (Right-of-Way and Roadway Improvements). DATED this day of , 1979 v - BOARD OF COUI7TY COMMISSIOIJERS OF SPOKAIJE COUIITY, IIASHING102J ~ Ai^1EST: ~ VERiJON '(J. OFILAIJD / - • C er /o the Boar , - , ~ . - By r4D j~ ~ yClerk -10- 1 ~ • ► " r . ~.rrJ'~ yS 1 ~~C ~ ~J ~'r'r„~~.C".~~~1►~ .qb`• ~ 'f'~ w ~ t~ ~ vs.ay;J w.y..}!`; ~ 1.~ ~ • . .,~,?yr='~.~►~ • .r.~l.Pr.~.>7M~ ~ % . = ~ v~~- • ~ Tf+~'t' "q f ti ~~~~~T~ ~ y. . • I~' aI 11 • r `,r "''%:'~-~1~ ~~/~c'.,:~-TY..+R,,'ti;,Tt~,r, 1'~'?~"'',~; !-.,.~/.J ; p :_~f ~-~.'.,.~'!Y,'►,~.~:. ; ~,3{'.r,~c,, • . _ _ ~ r ► ! Y . _ r_ i'~' , . . . r+ -i. • - -1" r = ~-_t'. ^r1 `''rt" Y~r <``~'1 V/+~1`"`1~,~1~ ~ . AGENDA, October 26, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, October 26, 1979 - 1:30 P.M. (Item #1 on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor N 721 Jefferson, Spokahe PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1342-79, RAINBOW ADDITION ZE-225-79, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, MULiIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN AND R-2 a. Location: The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley south of Broadway and approximately 125 feet east of Conklin Road. b. Legal Description: Section 13, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. All of Tract 3 of "VERA" and a portion of Tract 4 of "VERA" as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "ON page 30 of Plats in the office of the Spokane County Auditor, more specifically described as follows: Tha t portion of said Tract 4 of VERA, lying N4Jly of Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad right of way; EXCEPT the following 2 portions described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of said Tract 4 with the PJIy line of the right of way of the Spokane and Inland Empire Railroad Company; th. N along the W line of said Tract 4, 157 feet; th. E parallel with the N line of said Tract 4, 280.9 ft. more or less, to the Nly line of said right of way; th. Sllly along the Nly line of said right of way to the point of beginning;Beginning at the i ntersecti on of the W 1 i ne of sai d Tract wi th the Nly 1 i ne of Spokane & In 1 and Empire Railroad right of way; tn. N along said W line 157 f t. to the true point of beginning; th. E parallel with the N line of said Tract 4, 210 ft; th. N parallel with the W line of said Tract 386.8 f t. more or less, to the N line of said tract; th. W along said N line 210 ft. to the NW corner of said Tract 4; th. S along the 4J line of said Tract, 386.8 ft. more or less to the true point of beginning, situate in Spokane County, Washington. c. Sponsor: J. Brent McKinley N 1014 Pines Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Engineer: Senske & Associates, Inc. E 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 e. Site Size: 16 acres f. Number of Lots: 13 g. Proposed Land Use: Residential Office, multiple family & duplex use h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Residential Office, Nlultiple Family Suburban and R-2 j. Water Source: Vera Water and Power • k. School District: Central Valley #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site septic tanks m. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act 4JAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." - 7 - u/li GE ~ N04 . • ~ cQRoER , I r~ n3 174 175 176 ~T7 178 r E • ~ • ~ ' ~ ~ a 0 . J p . ~ 116 Y ~ • ~ DOONE , `90 , ~ BR,oGE PE-1342-79111111 c „Ue0 *AVf ~ 11111101111 ' o N+ 4 so 6 AC.16± 90 1 N'E R:STATE N IGNIKAY ~ r BaoAowAY AvE. v . ~ . , , ~ . g ~ Fire ~ - ' ~ ~n ~ . '~~Y • o rtss~ rjtatl0n ~ Z ~l ooIf K' ibxpl . D ~ o < ~ }io O ;~J.lCt rio > m d Jt`~`"` ~ ~ < ' - - ~ Z ~ C VALti.E tNAY r r + , ~ ~ . , • z O M~~ M Z' N1 ~I►1 N r V AVt Ri ~ IU , `r z v I i /9 • _ SPRAGuE NIECWi u u ► , . . . ?lEll04! • , .y~ ~ "t vE AI.E ~ ~ P, R.R. Ga C 0 ~ ~ N ' ~ _ r . ~ . . l `r • ~ • ~ + ~ ` Q I MO , ' 3 RO:1ooo w U &V Z f W ..r _ ~Mw .o~ ~ 1M ' ~ " ~ • I~ Ari ~ c ' STAFF ANALYSIS - October 26, 1979 PE-1342-79, RAINBOW ADDITION ZE-225-79, AGRICUI.TUR.A.L TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE, MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN & R-2 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. History This property has been considered for previous uses and densities by both the Hearing Examiner and the County Commissioners. Various recommendations and decisions in the past indicated, at one time, one acre lots and no duplexes for the proposal. At the last hearing in December, 1978, the Hearing Examiner denied a proposal for ten single family lots on 4.8 acres with the statement that there could be a different use for the property depending oa proposed zoning and land use decisions in the area. This decision reflected the pending action for a regional shopping center directly north across Broadway that has now been approved. The sponsor has submitted this proposal, which includes residential office and high density residential uses, to be compatible with the possible shopping center activity to the north across Broadway Avenue. B. I,ocation The proposal is located in the Spokane Valley in the $eneral area of Greenacres, adjacent to and south of Broadway Avenue approximately 650 feet west of Flora Road. C. Proposal - 16 acres subdivided into 13 lots. 6 lots @ 13,520 sq. ft. for duplex use 3 lots @ 1.3 to 2.2 acres for Multiple family 4 lots @ 1 acre to 2 acres for Residential Office Residential Office = 6.5 acres Lot 1, Block 1 = 14,026 sq. ft. Maximutn building area Lot 3, Block 1 = 19,972 sq. ft. Maximum building area Lot 4, Block 2 = 32,778 sq. ft. Maximum building area Lot 3, Block 2 = 32,778 sq. ft. Maximum building area Total Maximum building area: 99,556 sq. ft. Multi-family = 5.7 acres Lot 2, Block 1= 28 Maximum Dwelling Units Lot S, Block 2= 47 Maximum Dwelling Units Lot 12, Block 1= 46 Maximum Dwelling Units Total Maximum Dwelling Units = 121 Maximum Dwelling Units Duplex = 2.9 acres Lots 6-11, Block 2= 12 Dwelling Units -7B- STAFF ANALYSIS - October 26, 1979 RAINBOW ADDITION - continued• ~ D. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. E. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existing Zand Uses The proposal lies in an area that is presently rural residential with limited subdivision activity nearby. To the west k mile is the John Henry Subdivision with duplex and single family uses on lots of 11,250 sq. ft. The Flora Acres Subdivision is located approximately 650 feet east of the proposal and is for single family use on lot sizes of approximately 40,000 sq. ft. South of Broadway Avenue and surrounding the proposal the area is composed of tax segregated parcels which are in rural residential uses with parcel sizes of approximately one to five acres. North across Broadway to the freeway is that area designated as a regional shopping center. 2. Compatibility with ExistinR Land Uses The sponsor is proposing a project that provides intensity land use along Broadway in the form of Residential Office, then high density residendial uses and finally stepped down to R2 uses along the south side of the plat. This proposal forms a buffering function from what is essentially large lot rural land use that exists between Broadway and Sprague Avenue. The proposal appears to be compatible only if the preliminarily approved shopping center and the oagoing study concerning the immediate area reflect these intensity uses and they actually become a reality. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and recommends conditions that allow for the satisfactory development of roads within the plat. B. Sewage Disposal The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis o£ alternative sewage dis- posal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, treatment plant and sewage lagoon. For economic reasons, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engineer feels on-site septic tanks should be utilized. The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments: - 7C - ' STAFF ANALYSIS - October 2_6, 1979 RAINBOW ADDITION - continued Impact Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 13 lots on 16 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by the plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background. - - - The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of .79 to 1.8 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 perceat would result in a range of 8.6 to 1.9 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. 2. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relativelq poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields. - 7D - STAFF ANALYSIS - October 26, 1979 RAINBOW ADDITION - contlnued ~ C. Drainage The County Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plan submitted by the applicant indicates that on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health District prior to the final plat filing. D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Vera Water and Power. The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1. The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final fire flows and water plaas. F. Schools Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District # 356. G. Parks The report "Plan.ning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates an existing elementary school approximately 1 mile west of the proposal on Broadway Avenue. Also sites for a aeighborhood park have been proposed adjacent to school sites have been proposed in the area west of Flora road and south of Znterstate 90. H. Unique Environmental Features None have been indentified. I. Cultural Resources , None have been indentified. III. ZONING ANALYSIS The site and most of the surrounding properties are zoned agricultural. To the west and south along Sprague are commercial and other zone classifications. If the adjacent proposals concerning surrounding land use materialize it would appear that re2oning to Residential Office, Multiple Family Suburban and R-2 zoning would be coasistent for the area. In this regard the rezoning has been conditioned to apply only if adjacent commercial use is assured and that a site development plan is approved at public hearing for the Multiple Family Suburban and Residential Office zone classifications. -7E- ~ ' STAFF AiJALYSIS - October 26, 1979 RAINBOW ADDITION - continued IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. Slight adverse environmental impacts were zdentified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air; water; flora; fauna; noise; light and glare; land use; population; housing; transportation/circulation; public services; utilities; and energy. The staff is circulating the attached paperwork so that the necessary 15 days of circulation pursuant to SEPA will have occurred on the day that the Hearing Examiner Committee is scheduled to consider this matter. The proposal presents a dilemma at the threshold determination stage. The proposal is predicated upon the materialization of the Valley Mall (Environmental Checklist II-2 and II-8). The project must therefore be examined from a dual perspective relative to the threshold determination: (1) in the context of a future Valley Mall and (2) in the context of no Valley Mall, taking only existing conditions into account. With regard to the former perspective the staff supports a declaration of non-significance, finding this proposal to not have a significant adverse impact on the EnvironmenL, assuming: (1) an improved and adequate arterial street and, (2) storm drainage and sanitary waste disposai satisfying 208 recommeadations. HOWEVER, SINCE THE EXISTANCE OF A F"UTURE REGIONAL SHOPPING CENTER IS QUESTIONABLE FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS (law suit by SAVE and multiple proposals for a regional center and the almost certain reality that not all proposals will materialize). THEREFORE THE STAFF POSITION OF SUPPORT TO A DECLARATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE IS BASED UPON A CONDITION OF ZONE CHANGE APPROVAL TO THE EFFECT THAT T'HE ZONE CHANGE DOES NOT BECOME FINAL, AND NO FULFILLMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES SHALL OCCUR UNLESS A REGIONAL CENTER APPROXIMATING THE VALLEY MALL IS ASSURED AND THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE SO VERIFIES AND APPROVES Z'HE SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN PROPOSAZS IN A PUBLIC HEARING. On the other hand, with regard to the latter perspecitve, if the Hearing Examiner Committee is inclined to approve the zoning, effective prior to any regional shopping center becorning a reality, THE STAFF POSITION RECOIrIlKENDS THE HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE ISSUE A DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE. This position is based upon the potential impacts far in excess of "moderate", as described in the Norway Hills case. The maximum density being requested in the Multiple Family Subu"rban zone, pursuant to the preliminary plat map, is the maximum allowed by the zone. The direct and indirect impacts are mostly unknow, but potentially quite significant. There is also the probability that this action will be precedent setting and the cwnulative impacts of a series of similar approvals near the proposed, but as yet unresli2ed, shopping center would have an adverse impact upon the environment. V. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. - 7F - STAFF ANALYSIS - October 26, 1979 RAINBOW ADDITIOId - continued' ' 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the preliminary plat of record. 4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 5. That appropriate street names be indicated. 6. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 7. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protectioa be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for buildiag permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 9. That the preiiminary plat be given conditional approval to November 1, 1980. 10. That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. - 7G - i' STAFF ANALYSIS - October 26, 1979 RAINBOW ADDITION - continued NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320. 11. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 12. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. Special Conditions 13. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal actioa by the Hearing Examiaer Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. 14. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Residential Office on Lots l, 3, 4& 13; Multiple Family Suburban on Lots 2, 5, 12; R-2 on Lots 6 through 11. 15. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 16. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. 17. That a public water system serviced by Vera Irrigation District, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. 18. That aa on-site sewage management system be created and approved by the Spokane County Health District prior to the signing of the final plat. Dedicatory language of the plat shall include the statement, "each lot ownership shall be a member of the on-site sewage management system until said association is dissolved." . 19. That final constructioa plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer and the County Health District. 20. That prior to the filing of the final plat the zoning approvals allowing the establishment of a regional shopping center north of Broadway in the area approximating the Valley Mall are to be approved and filed. 21. Prior to building permit issuance a site specific and landscape plan must be approved by the Hearing Examiner at public hearing for the Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban uses in the plat. - 7N - STAFF ANALYSIS - October 26, 1979 RAINBOW ADDITION - contfnued 22. That conditional approval of the plat by the County Engineer is given subject to dedication of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record. 23. That plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of a final plat. Road plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 24. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of the final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer. 25. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown oa the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 26. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 27. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed prior to filing plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Builtf" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineez. 28. No direct access from lots to half right-of-ways until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 29. Road design, construction, and drainage control for half right-of-ways and stub road connections are the respoasibility of the Developer. 30. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded. A 1 foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de 'sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 31. Dedication of 25 feet additional right-of-way along Broadway Avenue. 32. No direct access be allowed from lots to Broadway Avenue. 33. Existing County roads providing direct access to the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer; curbed on plat side of road. 34. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. 35. That sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on Broadway Avenue. - 71 - ~ STAFF ANALYSIS - October 26, 1979 RAINBOW ADDITION - continued 36. Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section: Section Number 1 For Broadway Minimum Paving width Major Arterial Std. Section Number 1 For interior streets Minimum Paving width Urban Multi-family Std. Section Number 2 For partial right-of-way Minimum Paving width Urban Residential Std. 37. That building permits not be issued for Lots 6, 7, 10, and 11, as shown on the preliminary plat of record until full width right-of-way is obtained and the roadway improved to county standards and established. 38. Right-of-way requirements interior streets shall be minimum of 60 feet. 39. Proposed cul de 'sac is not acceptable. Cul de 'sac will be required at ends of partial right-of-way at time of construction. - 7J - ~ v~li ►1~ ~ . GE a ~ , • . ~ , LARDER~ . ~r~ n3 174 175 176 ,77 17e ~s , ~ ~ M 10 E . - - - - ~ - .s,' K ' 0 J 0 iL - ~ ~'Qc~ k, ~ • ' p00N E 1,,90 • BRIDGE PE-1342-79 c o , ACs 1+ 90 ~AVf ~ < 0 N94S06 ~ , . . 1N'ER-STATE HIGHMraY N• i♦ • ~r ~ , • r B aoADwAY Av E. ~ Fire . ' pai ► ~ ~StGtlpn 0 ► • 9fGS~ ~ ~ Z h~l~ . KI • o d • ~ Q Q '::~ect r'o > , ~ V/kbL LE~ wVA Y i . . ~ ~ , ~ . ,z 1 ' • Z . N 1 'J , ~ ~ ~ ~ r r~I►i w Avt M A► ~ N= ~ u Ri lm z QT44 ni . , _ ~ 1 r z v~ z a /9 SPRAGUE jtEjW& ~ u ' } . ~ . • ,~~s:'Y'~' ' r i E ~E~ t04! ~ "T. VE AI.E . ~ N I ~i rC M. bf. P~ P R.R~ ~ G 0 cr ~i7C I 1 ' 3 Ro; 1 1000 •sa ~ Z r ~ 1 tu ►0 Arf I ~ , ~~o•~c~ ~ Slf~ ~ . . 4 OFFICE OF COUNTYrENGINEER SPOKANE' C'OUNTY, WASH I NGTON - . - . • OCTOBER -16, 1979 L-TO: - PLANNI•NG DEPARTMENT• ' ' ' • - FROM: COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT v ~4 egiwbow Add:~ie. SUBJEC'T: #ROAD COfmIT ON's* FOR PLAT PE 13 N]DER-COVSIDERATIGN CO ND IT I O NS ~ I RCLED APPLY TO . PLAT = - Ea-that condttlonal approval of the plat by the County Engineer is gtven sub,Ject to dedication of Right-of-Wayand approval of the road system as (ndicated In the prelimtnary plat of record. Q.2>that plans proftles, and cross secttons as desi gned to County standards showin proposed s4reet centerllne and curb grades be su6mitted to the County Eng tneer Vor sn~a,pp'rovIa~l prto.r, \to, const,ruction a,nd/or the fi I ing of a fl,nal plat; road plans' to be. prepa'red un'der the• d i r~ect i on of a ' I 1 censed Profess I one I C i v t 1' Eng i neer, . E 3 thFatl dra,tfn•arge• ~p i ans alnd' d`esi gn'ca'I cu I afi~`onts'show i ntg the a I i gnment of dra i nage f ac 1 I i t i es •6e subm i tted to `tFie County Eng ineer for appr_ova I pr i or to constt-uct J on and/or the f 1 I tng of the f tnal plat. Dra:lin,a,ge 'plRan's to -be prepered -un-der ,the dlrection of a ITcensed Professional Civll Englneer. • E 4-that the regulatlons of the Nattonal Flood Insurance Program be observed since the proposed plat is affected by a Flood Hazard Zone. E 5 construction wlthin the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct superviston of a Iicensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Eng i neer w I th "As Bu 1 I t" p 1 ans and a cert I f 1 cate i n wr t t i ng that a I I i mprove- ments were installed to the Itnes and grades shown on the approved constructton plans and that all disturbed monuments have 6een replaced; (ano construction Nork is to be performed Mithin the exlsttng or proposed Publtc Rilht of Way until a permtt has been tssued by the County Eng(neer. Ail work is subJec to inspection and approvsl by the County Engineer; (E 7}all construction wtthin the existing or proposed Publtc Right of Way Is to be com- Fleted prior to ftling the final plat or a bond in the amount esttmated by the County ngineer to cover the cost of construct(on of Improvements construction certifica- tton ofAs Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlfnes shall be filed wtth the 6ounty Engineer; CNnounty o direct access from lots to I/2 Rtght of Ways unttl such roads are constructed to Standards and established as County Roads; E 9-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connecttons until such roads are constructed to County Standards and establtshed as County Roads; Qi.oconnectlons road design, constructfon, and drainage control for I/2 Rtght of Ways and Stub Road are the responsibtltty of the Developer; E-1 that ap roprtate provlsion be made that the followln described property be held in trust un~il the continuation of the streets be dedica~ed or deeded: A I ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundarY.(Tem- porary cul de sacs are requtred when streets terminate at the plat boundarTes.) E12-that tndivldual driveway access permtts be required prior to issuance of a bullding permit for driveway approaches to the County road system. Ei3 dedication of 21$FT-additional Rtght of Way along 8tr oqAj&" !QtlE addltional Right ot Way along addttlonal Right of Way along E I no d i rect access be a I I owed f rom I ots to 1ZroAAw41f ~j(~ • E15-that a statement be placed In the plat ded(catton providing for future slope ease- ments as required by Spokane County along . Q3~curbed existin County roads providing dlrect access to the plat shall be paved and/~! ~o the standards of the County Englneer; curbed on plat side of road. a that all public roads within the plat be curbed and/OR paved to the specifications of the County Engineer; R E18 that sidewalks are required along the arterial(s) on Wroima ; E19 Public Road Standard TYPIEAL Roadway Section ( I) Sect i on Number ~ For 'BraadwAti M t n i mum Pav i ng w i dth MAVpr ARTE2Ia/ Srd• (2) Section Number Fo Minimum Paving widtht&bAwt Ir1utT: STd• (3) Section Number ~ For Minimum Paving widthLLyrbta~►t MffV ~swtTt I S'~~ arfi (4) Section Number For Minimum Paving width ~ E20-that the owner , his grantees and assl ns agree to parttcipate in and not oppose or protest a future Roaa Improvement Dts~rict or County Road Pro~j ect on to sat i sfy the requ 1 rements of the County pav f'ng po-i"tZry. Tf~i s concfTflon may ne resc t nded ( f the County Eng Ineer determ i nes that pav 1 ng and/or curbing is necessary tor control and disposal of storm water runotf; E21-that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design pro osal acceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Htghway-Coun~y Road intersectlon. State Ht ghway Department approval of the proposed desl gn must be recelved prior to the fTling of the final plat. Improvements to the 5tate Highway are to be the responsibility of the Sponsor and may etther be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such ImProvements furnished to the County Engineer In the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. E22-proposed pr(vate road(s) serving lots w(th: no extension posslble; ex- tension to serve 8 or less lots; future publ-ic ftight of Way tract; E23-that prtvate road(s) be improved to standards adopted by the Board of County Commts- sioners; minimum easement width; mintmum improvement wtdth. E24-that the foilowtng statement be placed In the plat dedtcat(on: WARNING: Spokane County has no responsibility to build, tmprove, malntaln, or other- wise service the private roads contalned within or providtng servlce to the property descrlbed In this plat. By accepttng this plat or subsequently by allowing a bullding permit to be fssued on property on a private road, Spokane County assumes no obltgatTon for sald prlvate road and the owne►-s hereby acknowledge that the County has no oblfgation of any kind or nature whatsoever to establish, exam(ne, survey, construct, alter repair improve, malntain provide drainage or snow removal on a eriva$Rroad. T~iis re0u1rement is and shali rrg wiTh thQ I9nd and $h91t J be b(nPfn~ t~on owner, their e rs successors or ass ns nc udln the obli a(on to ar i- c"Ipate ~n the maintenance ot the private road as provlded herein. C(oYfj'j) r ~ 10 ~.:1 e~ Pe r+r*~ ~ t~ tooT b6 1 s sLLE d Fo L e Tjr !01 71 4h► ~ 11 f R~ S k e w iv Q„_N WLE-P r'Eliol;6Z~,y T Q~ #eECO / 2 d t.t 1-s o ' 40AI~1 l~iE d42~ e2 0~ ~.vd Es T•~ 6/.'~hFd. CE R i~ O~ 1o A~ ' Z.v7~~ 2 i e r S rtr EETS _ Shw1~ be M1oi imuv-i e~ Z 7 Pr o p e,.5 o~ C 4,t,l - c,ie- S A i1lo T_ ~ t c. E?Xgk Cl~E - SA ` b e r e~ ~O. p e~ oS, 1 ~ hT ar _ WA~ Ar 'nme gS OAAmfl'ru.mo/t/ . E i - E . / ~ , 4 > ~ E ' - , . , , ~ ~ , , ~ ~ / ~ ° -:'3~ i; PLANNING DEPARTMENT i ~ BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET r f~ I • ' r PHONE 456-2205 ~ 4 ~ 1 j,J •1 ff SPOKANEp WA.b"FiINGTON 99260 r~ 9*:.':~1.. i .d.,,.,';,a : 1 - :;,~lc.-i,►=E!~ , • 7, , _ SPOKANE COUMTY GOURT HOUSE Current Planning Octoher 11, 1979 T0: Whom It May Concern FR0M: bJallis Hubbard, Subdivision Administrator IItj~ Marcia Raines, Zonina Administrator Thomas G. Mosher, AICP, Environmental Programs Administrato ~ DATE: October 11, 1979 SUBJECT: Accompanying paperwork for declaration of non-significance for PE-1342-79 and ZE-225-79 The staff is circulating the attached paperwork so that the necessary 15 days of circulation pursuant to SEPA will have occurred on the day that the Hearing Examiner Committee is scheduled to consider this matter. The proposal presents a dilemma at the threshold determination stage. The proposal is predicated upon the materialization of the Valley Mall (Environmental Checklist II-2 and II-8). The project must therefore be examined from a dual perspective relative to the threshold determination: (1) in the context of a future Valley hlall and, (2) in the context of no Valley Mall, taking only existing conditions into account. bJith regard to the former perspective the staff supports a declaration of non- significance, finding this proposal to not have a significant adverse impact on the Environment, assuming: (1) an improved and adequate arterial street and, (2) storm drainage and sanitary waste disposal satisfying 208 recommendations. FIOWEVER, SINCE THE EXISTANCE OF A FUTURE REGIONAL SNOPPING CENTER IS QUESTI09VABLE FOR A PJUMBER OF REASONS (law suit by SAVE and multiple proposals for a regional center and the almost certain reality that not all proposals will materialize). THEP,EFORE THE STAFF POSITION OF SUPPORT TO A DECLARATION OF NOPJ-SIGNIFICANCE IS BASED UPON A CONDITION OF ZONE CHANGE APPROUAL TO THE EFFECT THAT THE ZONE CHANGE DOES NOT BECOME FINAL, AND NO FULFILLMENT OF PROJECT OBJECTIVES SI-IALL OCCUR UNLESS A REGIONAL CENTER APPROX- IMATING THE VALLEY MALL IS ASSURED AilD THE HEARIfVG EXAMINER COMMITTEE SO VERIFIES APJD APPROVES THE SITE DEVELOPMEPJT PLAN FQR THE RO APJD PIFS PROPOSALS IN A PUBLIC HEARING. Current Planning Qctpber 11, 1979 Page 2 On the other hand, with regard to the latter perspective, if the Hearing Examiner Committee is inclined to approve the zoning, effective prior to any regional shopping center becoming a reality, TFIE STAFF POSITION RECOMMENDS THE HEARING EXAMINEP, COMP1ITTEE ISSUE ,q DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE. This position is based upon the potential impacts far in excess of "moderate", as described in the Norway Hills case. The maximum density being requested in the MFS zone, pursuant to the preliminary plat map, is the maximum allowed by the zore. The direct and indirect, impacts are mostly unknown, but potentially quite signif- icant. There is also the probability that this action will be precedent setting and the cumulative impacts of a series of similar approvals near the proposed, but as yet unrealized, shopping center would have an adverse impact upon the environment. h~~ ~ ~ , PLANNIHG DEPARTMENT BRpAaWAV CENTIiE BUIIDING N 721 JEFfERSOM STREET ~ - ~ PHONE 456-22~= ` i~. SPOKAME. WASHIMGTUh yyttu 5YUwA14[ Countr couRI ..oUst CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM I To: 1. Department of Ecolog_y 6• School District #`3&1 I C E nrRa L_ ✓a c.LC,y~ t.i 2. Spokane County Health District 7- ( i nter-Offi ce) 3.Department of Social and Health 8. Services 4. Fire District # 1 9. G" 5. Water District # V~P-a' 14• H UD jae .c) E~ FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention : Wa 1] i s D. Hubbard REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some ot which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: {49.13y.2-79. I&-aas- 79 3 d._ 13 7 ns~~p ~ k.n4 ~r - To RO R,~t •J . n7 ' /'C,n CT V / IRa4!r4 rROrIDt A~LflFfltl.t_ R00*/t74V9ATs.0-poC""` t.4* 4~~aat/►T Q li~ ~4-o a~ D G~~ 0. ~c- - O~ 3 r1 oC. tr io1 , . ~ L G I! 4 7This determi~eion was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Inforrnation on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURtSDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on October . 197q . Please respond, if appropriate, a: your earliest opportunity, but no later than the public hearing schedulecf for OctQber 26. 1979 - The subject proposal or action ~ 15--NLOCATED WITHIN THE DESIG- NATED SP4KANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER ENVIRON- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation ( GW I E) shou Id be prepared. Enclosures I Rev. 4I17/79 . ~ ~ P File # YE-- aw- n ~ Sec. 3 T'sh'p ~.s Rige At'(( _ ;~;g ~ Classification Proponent ,};jt j ~ . , 1. .z~ f S P O K A N E C O U N T Y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checkiist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additio I pertiient da a h s subse- quently been reviewed by the IV 1 10 04'a pi I . rJ 9 . CA A 14 - The following data brief(y describes the proposal: A. Actions( s ) Requested : Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval Final Plat Approval ; Change of Condition ; Other . o O 8 . Description of Proposal : I #V ~ ~ C. Location of Proposal : ~N ~ro (of oA II. Review of Checklist: A. 51 ight adverse impacts are noted under the fol lowing questions : (1) ~ Earth (8) x Land Use (15) Energy (2) Air (9) X_ Natural (16) Utilities R esou rces (3) ~ Water (10) Risk of Upset (17) Human Health (4) Flora (11) X Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Recreation (6) Noise (13) X_ Trans/Circ (20) Arch/Hist (7) Light/Glare (14) Public (21) Other Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions : I Revised 6/1 /79 I ~ ~ ` . . so C. Discussion of impacts identified above: /vONoL I! I. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. ~ Concludes t e no potential ly significant adverse impacts an recommends ssues a proposed declaration of non- significance. B. Conctudes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recom- , mends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff inember(s) reviewing checklist: Revised 6/1; 79 . . J, . J ; - ~ c SIPo P, G _ 4A e ~ s • TwP.-Rge . 't9y ~ Er+vtRor~rrtAL 9 , l,tl~~ :n~~Qi,ctton: The Staa Envirornnental Po14C1 Att of 1911. Chaoter 43,21L. RCa. requlres alt sutt and 1aca1 qorarrrnentai agencies co consider envlrornaental vaiues oatn for their arn icttans and ~rntn licansing priwta Oroposais. The Act atso reoui ns that an Envtronwtal tmvact Stateaent bc preoared 'or a11 rnajor ac:ions significantly (and 'adverseiy'. as oer WAC 197•10) affectlnq tna qwitty ot the pnysiul fnrttonawnt. 'he ?urvose oi :nis checkjist is to ntep the eget+cies in- volved aetenrtine ,rhetner or noc a proposal is such amajor actlon. Pl"ss u+swer the fotlo+.ing qe,ssttons •s caQieuly •s you can wlth tRe inforvtti0n aresent]y avaiTabl• to you. Pleas• answer wutstlons as 'yes" or "i+ayoe" if, 1n your aptnion, *ven ortly sllqnt laoacu will result. rhe revie,Nen at the checklist wfTt be awar+r et ana cancern thewrtsslves ritA ch• deqr" of impatt. asking pou !or mort tnfertntlon. 1f necessarv. Whtre expldnetions ot your ansNers are revui nd. or ,rnKt rau De ieve in enpianation aould be helofui to qovernment declsion-meklrs. inciude your exajanatlon in tne sDace arovtaed. or use adeittonai oaqes, if necessan►. rau snouia incluae rQfBrenceS ca any reperts ar studits ot wnicr+ you are awam and tinlcn an reievant ta :tte answn yvu provte*. Cv+olets answen ta :hcse auestians nca w111 NeTp 311 ager+cies lnvolvea wtth yeur proposat to undertake tne requtred onvirornaenui review witnout ur+necessary Ctiay. 'he foilowirtq 4uesttons eROly to your totai oroaosai. not jusL to tM ttcensa for wnich yeu ere currently applying or the Rro- aosa i tor wnt ch acprova 1 1 s souqnt. raur ansti+en shou 1 a i ncl uae the i moacts whi ch r111 be caused br yaur prooosa1 Nhen i t i s coaptetrd. eren :muqh :omotetfon may noc xtur until soaetlrt+e tn t!n fucure. i-b1s wiil aiiow ail ot tfle agenctes w1►icN rill :a involved to coeqlets th8ir snvironmentai review neM. without duoitcatfnq papen+vrk in the future. !to ap0ltcatian shell be orocessed unt11 the cretklist hms been comoieted arb rtturned to the aooroprtate Cauntr aapartmenL. State 1aw rnuire ax lanatton tQr r rv '•e ' and '~+evoe~' inswer an c!~e ~~klt.st. The persan tomelttinq ~e fone may oe ~ulred to 3roVT~ exp anatians or no ansrers, ana in some cases. more cewtilso intorn+atlon to aid in a tnresnold datenstnatl on. 101E: Thts ta a standard +orm beinq used oy all state arsd locai a9enties in tt+: itate of 'Aashtrtqton for var+aus tyDes of _ proposals. 4any ot the questians may not apply tc your prapasal. If a auQStlon does rtot apaiv, just sns►+er it 'na" 3nd COnt1nu! On LD :11! nexC att!lt10n. £11VtR0►1lE11TAl CHECKL:S7 FORF1 3ACKGROUNO Um af Prooment. Transwestern Real ty Phone !Iuaoer 922-0702 z. ,wams: of Prooonent: N. 1014 Pi nes Rd. Spokane, Wa 99216 3. 3ate Checklist SucWttsa: A. aqtrtcy Requtrinq Chetklist: 5. !la,aw ot Propossi. 1f appltcaale: 5. ULUre artd ariet DeSCrlpt:on at the ronosal tnc uatne 5ut not limitea to +ts size. qenefai aesign ai~.u . anfl ather `ac:nrs Chat wilt give an accurate undersunaing oi its scove anQ nature): Multi-zone plat for offices, aats and duolexU Lyc3tion of Droposai toescribe :t+e anrsiwl settlnq of the prooosal, as -v:it as tne rxtent of the tand area a{`rctec 'Dy any srvirnnaental ta+oac:s, tncluaing any otRor Intonmation needed ta give in atclnto ur►csrstandinq ot :ft tnviron- awcati setting of the arovosai): 16,600 block of East Broadway 3. cs•.imeted 3aca for Canaletlan aY the Drooesal: 1981 List at all ?enetcs. Uunsas ar Sown+menc Aovrovats Zequirea `or the Prooosat (feeeral. suu ana local • inc'•u41rt9 re:oties): Hearinq Examiner Committee Acceatance of preliminary plat; B. Of C.C. accpetance of f i nal plat (ir iPAGE F8R EXPlNIATIOtI IS IMEGUAtE. PIFASE aT7,RCri AOOITIOttAI pAGES. ) t0a. Do fou, or tn• a+nar in the sv"t you eo not a+n tt►g suojecz tand, new any olans for 'uture nadlttons. apanstcn, flr •urtW acttvlty relatsd to or tannettaa rith Lhis proposat? If yes. ex0isin: iot. ao you a++n or nave o0tlons on 'end neirby or aGjacent ta _his ,roposal's locaition? If yes. sxolain: no 11. CO v0u know of 3rty p l arts Dy othtrs 1 nC l ua1 nq the owmer wn 1 cn mey •ffett the OroPv-t7 cavertd 57 lat++' :lroaos a i or S ana id;;aunc or nearoy? ;f yes, exolatn: • no '2. %.Ltacn any othsr aoalicatton tona :nat Ras Deen conaleted roaaMing :lse ;rooosal: !f long nas zegn caeolete4, trut is rxOKLld t0 be ftled at sane future date. -lescriDe trio naturo of sucn acoltcaticn forn+: N/A : I . :NY ir1ONMENTr1 IPIP.4C'S icxalinationt of iI1 'yes' lnd '"aybe" artswers art revufr*Q) Y!S MayQe 'JO 1. :ar►h. W111 the proposal result In: ;a) Unstatite ear.h condltiaes ar tn cnanges fn qeolegic strvctvros? _ X ;b) Oisruotions, atsplacewu. comoaction or cvercovering of ctie sail? X (.c) CranQe in LopagrapAy or qrcwrtQ surface nifet `eaturss? . . . . . . . . . . . _ -x_ _ ;c) The *estrucLion. caveriRg ar mmf!itaLion if any untaua 9taoiogic x or pr+ysical features2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ - :.e} any inc.•tssa in wind ar ,rater erosion of soils. ettttier in ar ott the site? JL ~ ~ . . ~ (IF SP 4 ~cPtµµNllT:t}N IS INAOcOUATE. Pl.E,1SE ATiAGH aG3I L 0:GF-S. ) (f) `hanqes 1n daposltton :r erosion Ot bmmcn sands. or ChattgtE Tn siltation. X ceoositlon or erosion wi+icn my aodity tbe cnannel of a rtver or strceo or the bed of tne ocean or any bar, inlet or lakt? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: Construction of aQts and office soacp. and parki na faci 1 i ti et wi l1 overcover soi 1 and sl i qhtl v modi fv exi stina tonographV 7_ P r(lad Aradi n, lot landscaping, etc. 2. Afr. wtll tfte Oroposal result 1n: Yes ~ Ho (a) Air Wsslons or detertcratlon of aaQiont air qwlltyt . . . . . . . . . . . _ X %lb) The creatlon of objectlonaDte odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (t) Alttration of air movt~nsnt. moisture ar twoKaturs. Or any cnangs in x cilmacs. etthar loully or r"jcnaily? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . kp I ,n,t i on: New dwel 1 i nqs and offi qgs wi 11 4ttract motori zed vehi cl es . ta-CLS trar~sit in coniunction with the Valley_ mall will likel impact. 3. siater. 'atil tt+e prooosai nsult in: Y" y~ N0- (a) Change 1n curr"ts, or tltt course or direttlon of wittr a+ovements. x 1n •1t~+er a~rine or 1'resn waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Chanqes in absa*vtton ratts, arainagt Dat:en . cr th* rau and X imount at sur{ict wattr nunoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (t) Alterations co thm caun • or flar of fload wattrs? . . • • • • • • • • • • • _ x ( a) Change i n tne sewun t of s urf ace +•a nr 1 n anr wa ter boay' X (e) DlscMrge lnta surlau wter, or in any iltentlon of surf8c• .ater owlity, inciudlnq Dut noc ifAittd Co temeracure. alssotvea X oxygen or tur0idlty? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ - (f) Atteration of th• dlrectlon or rau of f1or+ of ground y+acars? x (9) Chanqe in tne awnttty of qound waters. etqner chrouqn dtrec: additians or wltnarawal5. or Chrough interteptton of 3n x aouifer Dy cuts ar eAcavattons' . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • - . • • - - (h) Deterioratlon in ground wacer qwlity, aither N rougn Cirec: injectlon, or throuqn cne seeDaqe of leacnau. pnosoates. C!tlr"nt5. waClrAGr'ne vlrtis ar otttlria. 0r OtfNf S4bSLif1CK X i nto tht gouna raters 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (i) RlQuCtlfln tn :he aa+DUnL of wltlr ONlM1Se aVa1ia01e tor X. oubi ic raUr 5u001 ies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ D1iMC~: Roads and parki ng and bui Ec 1 di ngs wi 11 modi fy exi sti n9 drai naqe patterns. However, proper desiqn of drainaqe facilities will mitiqate. 3. Flara. Will tte proposal result in: LS yiYO! Kc ;a) CAsnqe in tt+e diverttty 3f saectes, or number of anv seeties of • flora (1ncluoSnq trees, snnios, grass. crops. -lfcroflora an4 3awtfc ;lants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X ~5) Reouttton of tr* numoers of ikny untoue, rare or enCSnqertd sostles of f1Cri? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X ~ ic) .'rttrvouctlon of r+a+ soecies of flare tnto an area. cr tin 3 Darrter to che norami repientsmwt of exlsLtnq SG*cies? X . . ~ ?d) Reduc:fan in acreaQe of arty a ricult croo? ~,an,=,pn: ~~ew 1 andscaping wi~~ repl ~ice exi sti ng weeds* and grasm Wl-fF those that are common to residential areas. FQUna. 'Atll the prmposal resul: tn: ~es Marae Vo ia) ChangeS in the 0lvtrsity of SOK1es, ar nuQOer of 3ny species of fauna ;btrd:, land aMnais includinq -e9tiles. f1sA ana snmt 1 ff sh. bEnthic organl snrs , 1 nsects ar itcrafauna ) 3 . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (0) Qeautttan of the nufters of any unlQus, nre. or endanqtre4 X sDecies of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i - {c) Intronuc:lcn of new sosctes ai ftura into an area, or *esult in a Darrler ta th• miqratton or iaovement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) 3eten oratlon of existlnq fisn or wiidllfe haDt u t' . . . . . . . . . . x EXOlar+atio++: Some domesti c pets wi 11 be i ntroduced i nto the area 5. 301se. Yes MaYae •to ,at Will the proposal tncrease tx/sctr..9 noise :evsis' . . . . . . • • • • • . X _ :.xQianatian- Traffi c noi se wi 11 be evi dent, however proper pl acemgnt ot buildings and landscaping will help buffer the interior s,f, neighborhood to the South. (single family) 7. L1qnL and aiare. °_s "iyGe 'i (e) aill the orooasil produce neti 'ight or qiare? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x - Exoianacion: Security liqhting of apts and offices and occasional-FeadT'19Tts from cars. 2 . . + . , . ' - E C E E (IF SP -!R E:cPLANAT;C'+ i5 iRAOEQ'UAT'E. PlEASE AT':.C:+ aCJ NaL AUG i J 1979 8. lma Use. !1L Nv,oe "ro (a) wt11 :tK proposal rtsuit in the alttratton at the present or ~ vtem+eo 2ar+d use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sf'OKANE C(~.1NTY ~tu„c,~: Thi s devel opment i s~roposed i n on_i unctic~a wi th4EMMM of the Valley Mall proposal; from a land use standpointt it will buff~r the interior neighborhood to the South of Broadway from intensive usaqe, tra-rrIc noise 9. !4atural tile~t~ct p~~sal ~sulc in: ~ ~ o~s ur_es (a) tncrtiio fn Che rate of us• of any natural reiourus? . . . . . . . . • • • • _ x (b) Oepietlon at any nonrenewable n4turai resource? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _2L- f,cptanetlon: To the extent that it is necessar,v for develoQment i.e. fuel, oil, lumber, steel, etc. for development and ooeration of the comolqx, 10. aisk of Jostt. Coes Che proposal lnvolve a resk of in ex01os1on or the in `y`" ~ re etse -37 naZarCOUS substances (1RClUCiR9, but not ifmited to, oll, ptsticidss, ctumt uis. or r3dtatlon) in the event of an acctdsnt or X uoslt carditloni2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~x lanati~n: 11. PoMulatton. fes ma ae ft X aill cne oroposai iitar t?+e locatlon. distrlbution, denstty, or gra+rch rau of ttie Awn populaLlon of sn aret? . . . . . . . . . . . . . L lanatton: 230 - 300 new persons i n apartment compl ex _ 1 141. 4QUS is. x Wfll Ue procosst affect existinq nousing. or create + dmnd !ar addi ti ona 1 ~+ous 1 ng? . • • • . . • • • • • • • • _ «l,n, ~an: Wi 11 create 92-117 apartment uni ts and 12 duQl ex uni ts 13. 'r3nS00rLaLiOn/ irtUldLion. aill ;he Or'OQOfaI reSUlt in: f_es, -43vtie No (a) Genentton at addltiona) ventcular r,+overant? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - (b) Eftecu cn existtnq parkirtg tatilities, or dennd for r+e+ parktnqi X _ !cl [epact upon exlstinQ CransDartation systesst • • • • • • • • - • - • • • • X _ (d) Altarattons to present patzerns of circutatian or movement x of ~oole and/or gooas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ie? Alterattons :o wataroorne, rail or air trafiic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . jt; Intreate 1n Lraltlc haZards to mot0r vehicles. X tiicyclists or peaastrians7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2alanat,on: Proposal wi 11 pl ace addi ti onal traff i c on Broadway, however, 5 E traffic lanes are anticiQated and should be able to handle the volume la. Paaiic Servlces. 4111 tlst aroposal nave an etfect uoon. or result 'f es 4ayda `Io Tn a nee(i for ne++ or aiterld gcvtrmnental srrvt us +n &ny of of :lie followtng arwt3s: til) F1r! Protat:ian? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - iD1 Polics pbtectiont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x - (c) Scnoois? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x - (d) Plarks or Othlr r'!C1'lit10na1 taC111t1es? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x - (e) Malntenanct of puD11c tacilittes, lncludfng roads' . . . . . . . . . . . . . x - ; f ) Other goverrmnta 1 strvt ces i . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - ne.ed .of al. l publ ic services Exoianation- New devel opment wi 11 ha.ve* (IF SPACE FOit EXplA1tATIQN tS :NAOErJUATE. PLEASE MaCH IDOIT:ON1iL PAGES. ; 15. Ene . at 11 ;hr prooosal *esult in: fes 4avice no ;a) Jsa of suosuntlal imcunu of fwi or 4nerqy? • • • - • - • • • . • • . • • _ x (b) O~d umn existing sou►•ces of wKrQy, or reoutre the daveieownc of ne++ sources of anergyt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ rxpia~ac,on: Existinq sources of en r will be used for heat. light. etc. 16. utit :t!es. aill the qrooosai result in a need far new systems. leg "'a" e 't° or atterations 'a t-,*,e ~ollowinq utiltties: ;i) Power or naturat gas' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - (b) Caaa,nicacion systaas' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (c) UUr? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (d) Sewer or sectic LanKS1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 'e) Scorm watfr arainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 3 . • ~ • FOR cXPV+NAT;ON :NACE"UATc. M.1:E ;TTACH O TOP1Al PIlGES. ) Solid wattt and 3100sal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X The proposal wi 11 need al l uti 1 i ty servi ces ava i 1 abl ein thP ~ Vall ~ V T Yn ~,;YOd Vo 17. Huaan 14ea1Lh. W111 Ue prooosal result in the Creatlon of iny hN itn hazards X or paces!L1iT health haztrc (exC2ud1n9 mMtal hwith)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolnnetfon: . 18. AS,stnettcs. '4111 the Drooosai r*suit in t!►e oDS uucLlon of any scwtc vista or •rie+r open to tt+e pub:ic, or wiil ;.he proposa) result in C.Ke creacivn of art aestMtlul ly oNensiw sit@ aw to Dubl ic view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ExolanaNon: 19. R~ t~i n wt11 ttM pr-opasal nsuit in in impact upon th* qwlity or ;usnt t~ y oi existlnq ricrutional opportunitles? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Exalanation: 20. Arcneolo4tcaliNistorical. Wtll the ornAasal result in an alteratfon of 1 "to s1gnifiunt arcneoioSiul or histartul site. strutwre. ooject or SufiClnq? 2z Exci i an:tta+: I : : . S i GNATURE i. the anaersigned, swtar unCer ttie walty of porjury that :he Above resacnses ire c+ede tnithfvily ars0 to :he ies: of ray cnoMledye. t also undanund that. should thare be +ny ri i 1 fu1 misrefl*esartatton Gr wt i l fui lnck of "uii disttesure on t:t)► RBK.Spoksne County may wltharaw enp declaratton of rta+siqnifitance Cnat it :aight is3ue in reitinte -Aan :nis tnackilst. ~ Dau: ~ropo^e^t= ~ (Pleat! PNnt 3r Ttpl) Proponeec: -5 R/[ -i I ~ f"1 1*h ~ Aedress : • ' 49 PhoM: 12 Z -0 Te Z . ?er'SCr+ camo ietinq fcrm: I ° Rh"IZI 7ri Oste: • CQ~irCulnt Or OtfiCi of toun[y ~v il~rirtq ~ttk l15t: ~mN4y 17/M&IM' ~ ~ S tsff `4e+noer( s ) Rtv iew i nq Choc1c 1 i s t: 2ad 4 ~~~~i ~~~c~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ s r ~~ro~~~ i - ~a~~ar~~ ~~!u~~~~ ~~n~ ~~r~ 1 ~ P ~AR , f~ . CFL ~~fiI~MFAIT ~ ro . . '4~r-, :l ' , . ~ L1 . a ~ , . ~ _ ~,j ~ t ~,~L ~~5~:~ if~T i~~~~ f}~ ~~n~r~ r~ ~ ~ ~'A~~'4Y~~ , ~ : , 1 ~ 't; ~ T' I ~9 ~ "1r,.~' .l 3 1 ro. ~ 't~~ e ri 4 ~ - e ~ ~ .f ~ ~ j - - ~ J. " 1 l _ t ~ 4_~ t ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M 'w?/~ C?~ T~ ?7 N 7~3 Ci~~!(LIN V~RAQA'L~ 4~A ~9~37 L ~ y 1, ; ° , - V € ~7 ~ ~ ~_l ~ t~ 1 ' S ,1 ~ ~ F ~ " ~ I ~ 7( 1~t~~p(~.~~~ p~,~~~, ~~~~~b N~IC E+~ W3T5FT ~ N15~T GF ~~3'~~T ~F 511~ ~l I C'~~~~ i~1 i n F~; ~~~~~-~~c~~ ~~are~c G~4R~ ~ C~ILDERS v~~a ~~cc ~u~~~r n~ yr ~ ~ c ~~sc ~ ~1~5FT ~1T N ~1~ ~~~KLtN ~ti~ V~R~'~~L~ F~A '~9037 13~4~-9~D~0 TbO~'05~{~~7 ~4 P~"CNG J~ 1~-~5-44 ~,~~54.24FT ~F ~ PR~~I, JQHN A ti~2'~'~O~.Tt~~T ~f 5~12 t~F ~111~ ~F 5~~ LY~ S Y.. F~ ~ - L~ F S k Z w~ l 4~ F fi ~ P R I~'~ R P' ~AN~4L '~/W ~VE~, ~ ACRU55 ~46~1VE ~ESC P~~IP EK ~F~C1AiU~,AY ~ R'V~ L 8~{~~ $PRAGI~E ~VF. ~ SP~KA fE WA ~9Z~(~ S'~- '^iy _ f 135~ri~-~7t}18 ,,,°~~4~?ff~ ~1~4~ ~..TF~ TF~I~LE [3 25 44 P~N f~~ 51~1/4 t~F ~iEW ~t~FE '~EMPLE - `f N~~l4 ~AF' ~iE~ ' F F~ ~ . - ~ ~~~T ~ ~ 2~ J tl~ SW COR ~h114 TH S99!~EG '~~~ll ~27 ~ ',v ~ A~~ ~ ~ ~f ~I C~F H~t 'A ~AY ~ ~ c~ ~ ~v~ ~t~o,~~~ ra ~~u~ r~ ~o~a~~ v~~~o~a~.~ w~ 1 T .~J2~tih1 '~T4~~T ►~/L ~0 S~Y LN ~'F ~SH ~ ~I-I ~LY AL~ ~ 1 'f0 PT ~N LN PAR ~!I Tti Z~t~FT ~I ~IEAS A1' R1A T~ LAST A~~pV~E DESC ~.'N €H S4~EG ,~7 ~12"lI~l 1~8f~5,5F1` ~0 ~f ~1W L~i ll~ A~e Y d ~ii~0 A V'E TN 589p~G ~~MIh1 E~fl~F~' T~ T~'UE X A ~ ~ ~ C NAL ~t/N ~1~~~+1-~0~7 74~ 4A01'~5 4~ S~YA N ~ E L N C 13 Z5 44 53~OFT C~~ '~I~ ~#~SL~Y~N ~HU~~F~ I ~ ~ ~ PP~'Y' • ` 9 F ~ E5T .~6F~ QF 'N1,~3$.1~~T '~#r~14 UF l~~ll~r LYG S t~~F E lb~t23 ~R~AfIWAY AVE P5H ~l~ EXC C~ R~ W~~ADAI.E ~f4 ~9~~~' ~~5~1-~a~~ ~~►t~~4~+~155 r~E~LEYdN CH ~ ~-~~-~4 Pt~J ~c°~L N~ l~L~SL~Y~4l~ CNl1kGH ! ~ ~~~~r ~u s~z~~t~ ~~~~.3~FT flF ~r~~~~. ~z~r s~~~~, ~v~i~~ r~ a~~c~~u~~ r~~~s LY~ ~ ~Fx~ ~ R~ ~ ~ ibk~~ BR~~~W1~'~ v~~~~a~~ w~ ~~a~~ 13~4~-~~~~~9 ~7UAN~ L~ORIiV 13-25-44 ~104.~~1~ ~F RA f ~~IT ~~I _R ~ N ~1 ~f~~.~~I ~ ~ , d~~1~ ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ b~ a _ ~ w~ a~ ~i,z s~~ s s~, ~.x~. ~c~~ ~ ~t~~~►~ ].3~~r~-9fl~~+ 7~0~~~~131 M~I S~W~~~)~ 13 ~5 ~+~i PT 5112 ~F ~ fi ~ ~~Ci~ M~LVIi~ NEI~4~ B~G AT ~C ~ F ~tt~ I~ NI~ ~ ~ ~ ~~1 'U~ ~ ~ ~S~Ffi ~l~ ~U ~~tLY L~I ~F ~~2~~ l7'~~"~I ST ~E~!~!-OP~f~AT f~ I ~NG GhI I~I T~ N~~Y A~,~ 5~ S~~Y LN ~~~3FT MI~ T~ ~ L1V '~~~€~INVILL~ WA 9~07~ ~1~ A T ff F T ~ E~ 1 3~ V. l M!` L T~ 1 J { l F S f~ V L Y I R~ ~ t S~ ~ I W fi H i~ ~ 4~,~G ~D S L~V ~48.~"~T ~"W S 5~'~~~ t~,I~ TO S~L~" ~N Si~ ~i~ Rl~ TH ~IEYA r1 L LG S S~L~ ~N ~1~.5~T "~I1. T~D 1~ LN ~F ~13t V~E~A ~H N~~~F~ ~/L ~D P~~ ~xC H'WY 4 - _ _ . 5~r' ; , 1~ 1 4~~5 T5~1~~6~?1~~ ~I M SC~MI~T , 13 2'~ 44 ~~Wllk ~F ~~1/4 ~I~IT ME~VI~V M S~E ~ A P R ~ ~ sc ~ C~ ~~~c~e r~~ i-r~fi~ s~ P ~ ~r~o~~r~vtL~~ ~a~~~ ~ L~541-'~~llb 77DQ1~~13'9 ~~A~VE L M'D~I'~ 1~ 25 44 PTW N~C~- RAINI~~ ~T~ _ IE . ~ I~l~ ~ rc~l;~t t~ OP~~RA~IA~G GN R~ i~ 51/~ C~ N1/~ CY~ ~~F ~t3~i4~.7d~+F~ ~~~f 4~~ 5~1~1k~ ~ . ~ ~ra ~ w~~~~,~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 Z06 ~ 5T5B b FANC~E~ VER A~1 3 PT 1 1 N~F ~"R131 ~UR.G~SS JAI~~S H , ~ ' LYG NLY ~F S~.Y ~N AliAN R~ Rl4~ E 1b71I ~R,~'~~'~AY Alf~ ~ - V~RA~~L~ NA ~~~37 - ~ ~ l~~41-~2~2 - V'~~cA ~1~1 I~T'~,t TR131 ~ ~55 l~ „ _ - - ~ ~ ~ a - , . ~ ; , , r ~ ~ 1 ~ 7` I 1 ~ ~i? ~1:~ 7`ry Y ~V C ~;.t 4 ~ 1~-- ?~'~~~1►~M~ ~ ~ _ . ~ f r ~ ~ VERA~AL~ WA 99t}37 - . ~ i~. ~}11iYQr"~'~ ~ , ~ ~ CH4L,ICH ~I~CN~LAS : { y~RA W7+?.6~t c~F E~7~ 1~S~il ~~1~ ~ r- ~--ICf~ ~E 1~~(~5 ~1~~~1D'~AY ~~~~~p~~'~~ ~ LYC~ S ~l~ ~'l~l BLi~ ~3L ~ ~ VERA~A!L~ V~A 9~~3T , ~ , GHALtCN t~I~N~LAS - 7 {}1~40~175 ~ ~H&L~~I~ V~RA ~T5 ~4'l5 ~F r 13~4~ 1~i 4 E ~~b~~5 4R~7A!~WAY ~LK 13l L4'~ S OF ~/f~ F14~ VER~DALE 1~~ '~"~~~T FI~ ~l~T 5~11 ~!t -1? '~7Z8~3 CH~LI~~ ~I~RA f~~31 PTN 1 . . 3 ~[l~3 b $~C5 t`~~~~n FT {~F ~331~F~' ~YG 5~~ RR RiV~ ~,1~ W~~O - _ - , M ~~~IM TG 3544-~~14 l~f~~43G ~ R S R1EG~L VfRA P~ C~F R4 i w~~ N rr N~F ~ik ~Rl~r fiM ~1 l~LG S~ 1~ ~~~(~~~~1 ~r BEG AT IhiTF~S~C DF W~N I L ~ I~y ~b~ _ ~'Rt~~ Ptl~ TH ~ PAR ~IT~I ~I L~l ~F SD ~R 4 2~~F~ ~H ~I ~ r ~r~ l~~~t ~a r , - ~ ~~.'~~Y ~+1'L TG N~N ~f S(~ TR 4~H W A11~ Sp LN P~ ~ITH W L!N 3 - - - - ~ T'~ ~ A~.G LN 38b.9F~ M!l TU T~RU~ ~l~t~~ ~1~FT T~ N~I C ~ +~~I~~ PAU~ 544-~~1'~ 1~~741~C P d~ff~I~E VF'P.~ ~]F 13 R OF ~rL 1~~]'I~ ~L ~F 5~ ~ ~.6506 ~R~I~~~~Y AV~ f~TN N~l~ SC~A~p (~Y RlW E~cC f~~~ INTE SE~ M L i~ NL~t L~I V~R~►DAL~ ~IA ~9031 ~rw ~ s~ +~r. ~~7~r ~ ~n ~v~ r R a~ TC~ P~~~ ALSD ~Xi. ~~G AT IN~'EnSE~ flF 5[~ ~R RIW 1'1~ SWt~Y A~G ! ~ Y N ~ '~I~I ~'H M ~tLG ~l) Li~ 1'~~~~ ~i~~~~~~►wt~+~n~~ ~ s rH~~a~ ~~t~r~~~v~~ z~c~~~rr~~,~~,~ ~itr+wt~r~ ~r~~~ ~a~ N~I S~ T~ 4 T F~ l~ A L~'~ 1+J F T TC N4~ _ 386.8~T ~l;l~ L - v TN ~ AlG W L~ 3f31~. ~FT ~I~`L T~UE ~-Y-~ j ~ ~tGHI~~~I` CLI'~T0~1 E 3~}t~~~ .JIM H~7LI~E~' V~RA P'f Q~ ~~i E394.7FT 1~544-Q~r1C? 7~~+~p ~ N ~r7~~ ~d~I~SPE~. 5T . ~r~r s o~ ~r~ G~ ~~~s~ ~~a~c~r~~ ~a ~~zt~e ~~~~~~~a~r c~~~r~~ ~ ~~4~~~~ '~`~~1~~C M T WA~SON V~RA PT ~f ~l~ A 1. l ~ ~ ~ R At~J T~t~` E~'~4.7~T U~ ~4 N 471~ ~A~.~ SP~L 5~ ~ ~~M fi~av~~- ~~~T ~64N1~ vC~A~~P ~Y ~1V+ ~ ~ ;r'i~~+~''~~ G;:h r~~ 1 ~ ~~2 R d'WHI~~ V€~A ~3 ~11~ i~~l~. ;~LL c;~ 13~44-Q~~O~ C _ ~b~~b ~~(]A~~fAY AV~ VA~ RR ~/4~ rl~ fi~A~Ci` V~R+4DAL~ ~~9~~T . - , r r- , 3~~ ~ K r_ ~ . _ . r f3 ~ ~ ~ : ~~~i4~l~L T ~ ~11~~~ ~ ~f - ~7 77'~~;1;~~~in~~ J.~~~~_~` w p~I_,h,I~~~~Y U'~''R?t ~1/, ~4~ I~ _ 1.~ t4 r~; 1~1.4 Ra , ~I~ANk~ - ~ ~ r• _r~ t`". ~ti ~IIL~SPIE ~ 13544-C~~E~ ~~~~~~~~,)7<~ N~ .,~LL~_~~ ~a ,t t~ ~1. d E lb ~Tt~~ ~~~4DwAY AVE VERADA~.~ 4~A ~''~~3T . , . ~ , ~ 3,~ WdLLA~~ ~IL~LT~M ~ ~ ~r ~F~ ~~k. ~ ~~Ll.~1C!~ w'~F.,'~ ~~.rJw~~ , ~~1 1 ~ +4 t R ,~DWAY AI~~ E 168~+~ ~ C~ F ~ ~I~ F~~ V~~ ~4~A~ ~ ~A~ ~ 9{~~T W~~L+~CE I~~L~IAM ~ 4'~ 43'~C W R WALL:~~E V~'RA F11~ E?~C ~i140FT OF 13'~44-~f~Q~ 4 ~j C I68~~ ~R~1~t~WAY VE ^~I1 fi ~ . V~~?,~i~4~F n~~1 ~903T a F ~ ~ ~l ~ I ~ ~ C] ~4'~ fi ~ " 4~E]516 19~+9~d~~ ~I F t#UNTE~ VEp'A +V11.~~1 ~ 1, 13'a 4 ~~D~?~1~7'6 ~ v~ ~ , , q,, , - ~ w ~I~ ~A N~t ~f~N 5 r- 5~t ~~r r, a l~f ~ ~ 1 P A S~.1(~ F~ C~ I+! 2 2 QF T 1~ +4 l ► _1 ~ ~ ~(~4 C'~NK~ I N n~F ~ ~~]F~ ~ ~1~_ V~~iAUA~L E I~A 99~37 1GHTF~]C7T C~.ZMT~N E ~ ~7Ffi ~ ~ 75 ~13(}~B~ JI~ ~~ILM~~ UE~tA P~° f~~ ~5 ~I _ 1354~-t~521 f~ , - F T 5~~ ~in ' ~ E~fC ~~33~}FT C~~ W15~FT ~i 471d~ CAL~SP.,~ ~ ~J . ~'Y1. ~t ~ C ~J 11 ~ F X C ~ 03 . 6 T ~ ~ ~r~ ~~cC 52~3.~ T ~ . - - - _ - - - ~ ~ - _ - - - - ~ . ,i ~ ' , i f ~ 1 , ~ ~ , t~ ^ i ~3 ~44-~514 ZHE~(317~9t57 T H~hJDR~C: StIN ~ 'V~RA ~~1~ ~%C W27Fi" ~ LIP~~ `~k~T SAV ~K 0~6 c ~ c~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~c ~~~~r ~ i c~ ~ _ yr r ~ J~ ~4' ~ ~ 1_~Li1IY~~ ~I~f~ ~f1+~F ~3~! ~ l1~17~1~ ~ ~ 1~~4 ~D 13 1 L S 'U , ~ ~ t~~z~ ~t~t~~~~r w~~r E' V~R4~~~LE ~l~ 9'9~3~ ~ G , H ~ F E~~ t SCi~ 0~ i~ t~1544-~625 ~ 0'~~C 4 hf ~R jSC U'~R N41~ ~7 ~W~/~ ~~1 1. { ~ , ~ lb5l ~ V~4~.~.EY ~'~4'Y If~~A~A~E '~'~0~ ~fi ~ - 3 9 ~ P~'~ V~RA W 1/5 C]F E~ ~'2 A~J'~ Pl1~EK N~.4TT#~Fi~ ~ C , 1~544 1~b~4 ~ U E ~ 5 F W ~ f~ ~~'~23 'VD~!~~.EY~~IY AV~ ~ L~l t] 11 a ~ U'~R~~AI~ i~~ 99t~~7 , f ~ _ r, ~ 3544 ~ 3 1'~1~I9988 ~ Y~UNG VfF~A W1/~ !~F "~11~ DF Y~UNG NfAL 'F ~ 1 ~0 2 ~d ~ • , ~ ~ • j F''7J1 ~ . ~ k ~~V~1~ 7~~~~~ 4 / L ~ ~ - V~~~~~~~ ~~Q~~ ~ f . i ~ . f ti ~ £ '~4~+- 62 f. RA ~ 11~ MM ~l~ ~F i~AC ~'AT B~ Cf~ ~A~'~ 13 Q ~ - ~ IJ~~~~G~ ~r~:~ 4 ~ ~ r ~ ~41'l0 ~b ~$993~36~~t} ~~~3C~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~r~ ~ ~MA RA F ~E~ M+4~ NAK 4~ A~I , 1354 0~2~i 7~~+]~ { 1~36 W!. ~I~IAK V~ ll5 I I~L~ ~ ~ ~ 1~~~ 4 2 I S T AV E ~ P KA N A 99~ 4~ S ~ E 4~ ~ ~ - --.f . - ~ ~ i' E PA~: ~fiT~ CdR~ Z~~44-0~'3 760~aZB~f~~4 T~M SPRA~~ 1f~RA 4~13~~~ OF B S C , r ~ ~ ~ I ~.y ~ V~I ~ ~ ~ z~T v~~~~~~ ~ C 5~~0 T C G~ r 1~5~~~4~'~4 ?3~~(~~~1~91 RQNALD ~ A~A~15 VERA N11~ ~F ~3~'FT A[~Ar~S R~NA1.I~ 5 L~' ~F wzfi4F~ ~7 ~ i~~`I3 vAL~~Y '~AY V~'~A~ALE W~ 9~1~37 ~ ~ ~ h l3544 Q~'3~ ~~}56~8A C HILL VE€iA ~ll~ ~lF E~3~~~' AQAMS ~~,AN~H~ 7 A Y Y ~]F 'W2~4fT ~T ~ i~ 13 Y i~L'~ ~A 9i' Y~41~~~~L 11~ ~7~~~ ~~~44-t~T~9 7~~D317~?77 ~AV~t~~~RT ETA~. ~fRA E13~FT 4~3'~6~T Q7 ~AV~N#~O~T w~L~A~~ ~i ~;Il~~d T~ ~ L~~~ J~ 1,~ ~ ~~~~3 ~AL~.EY ~lAY V~'~A~+~L~ W~ 9~~~~' 1~5#4-OT~~ I15~~~~ JG~~5~A1 VERD~ ~~~~~T OF WSCBF~ ~7 ~ ;~~lH~SDN GE~RGf J ~ E 1~~13 VALLE`Y 1~~Y UER~DALE 1~l~ ~90lT ~ 45 INPU~ GA~~S P~~~ESS€D, t~~D ~Gt~RfiESP~l~~~~I~ P+4RC~14~~ f~Ct~~J~ ~pN FIL~ . c t/M~~~1♦1 ~l./P`7~Mi ~~~4'1 ~~~Wd ~M~~~~~ 7 ~\817~ L~'A6~/ ~ ~ 7 e/ ~ a ~ j♦ ~ y+ 1 ` I~ t R . ~ r-•~~~ - ~i~~ . i • _ i~ ~ n r o~a~E CpGy~ ` - y rr ` SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Offi ce Communi cation Date: August 1979 • Spokane CoR'y Plannin9 Commission 0 ~ TO. Ce7 ~ ~ j ~ ~ y scott Fink s . and Eugene c . Pr 4R.S. FROM.• . - ,AJ G . ~ p p~ SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary Plat - Rainbow Addition ~ ~C -9 ~Fpq Uy~Y 1. References: 9141~;,Yj a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 60' by Senske & Associates, 7-30-79, received , by this office 8-2-79. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Re- sources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the Spokane Val1eY, D.K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metro- politan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. 208 Study chemical sample results. g. Field Survey Report, Scott Fink, Spokane County xealth District, August 90 1979. . h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Topography, Soils, and Water: a. This project lies in a relatively flat area between Vera and Greenacres. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. e SCHD-ADM-118 , • • 'i ~ - , / , ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ ` ~ , ~i. t.,.,l If , PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CEN"fRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET i s g PHONE 456-2205 , ~ . d • SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 R . v . : SVOKANE COVnTr GOUR7 HOUSE TO WHOM IT h1AY CONCERN D PLAT FILE MEMO I picked up the public information packet for the Preliminary Subdivi sion -i3 lz - 77 on thi s Z~ Y~ ~ day of 19for adverti sement of the t Subdivision Hearing to be heard on i(? c 2~ 19" Name . 2-~ Signature: re,41r~ . , . ~ < Rainbow Addition August 10, 1979 Page 2 d. The data from three 208 study wells in the area shows the highest total nitrogen level was 1.8 ppm. The Vera Water District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact Discussion: a. The plat sponsor has proposed 13 lots on 16 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage dis- posal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd cansidered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwateY, and the effect of continued urhan development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) Al1 dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por- tion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phos- phates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol- ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."---"The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when com- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of .79 to 1.8 ppm. A projected incre- mental increase using Dr. Todd4s expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges .86 to 1.9 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: 1 Rainbow Addition August 10, 1979 Page 3 (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment _ and perhaps more to obtain a perm.it for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically avail.able for this project. (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. 4. Recommend that: A public water system including fire flows serve each lot prior to ' sale of the lot. b. Each lot be authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage system. 'c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of fifty-six (56) dwelling units are authorized within the plat. d. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. e. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility com- panies, County Engineer and Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the sub- mittal of the final plat. (Note: The first sentence is superfluous if the easements are shown on the preliminary map as required by Ordinance Chapters 5 and 6.) - f. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer and Spokane County Health District for approval prior to construction and the filing of the final plat. g. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system. h. An on-site sewage management system shall be created and approved by the Spokane County Health District prior to filing of the final plat. Dedicatory language of the plat shall include the statement, "Each lot ownership shall be a member of the on-site sewage management association until said association is dissolved." i. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that Rainbow Addition August 10, 1979 • Page 4 the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited." j. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in con- formance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. -Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. k. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been , made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from•claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. 1. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State Health autiiorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." clw c: Senske and Associates East 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA ~ t~- Y 7 . ~ .0p ~ , RECEIPT Date_a IS 19 2946 r , R e c e i v e d F r o m ~ l naw3wz~~n, ~.f-e~, j e4 ~ 1,rC.0.q vtc, • , Add ress_ QI-0412 U Ilars $ 5-20 ,00 ~ For P-'~,:vv~v~ QQI P~ - 131f--~-74 - f 4~n~n.Lo W I ACC4UNT ~ HOW PAID T}~9 ` 1 '[7~T~ / '7 u~T 1~~ilSJC~rJr AMr Of S n ' rT^ CO1uY ACCOUNT ~ C'»H Alhi PltiD ~ CHECK D~' ~ ' BAtAP1Cf ~ MONEY p ~ f%UE J ORUER ' Dy~l O A~,V 8K806 RRdrfQrm ~ I Telephone 924-3800 Distnbutors of Water 8 Power - . 60i NOF2TH EV►RC;REEN VrRAbALE, WAShu'vC;,TON 99037 ECEII ~ AUG 15 19?9 Juiy 31, 1979 ~pUH~ SP0KA~~ E.PARIMENT PIANN~~~ D Spokane County Plat Administrator North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Attention: Wally Hubbard Dear Mr. Hubbard: Re: Rainbow Addition This is to advise you that Vera Water and Power has discussed the water situation with the proposer of the Rainbow Addition, Mr. McKinley, and he does understand that the water supply is deficient in that area for his purposes. There is adequate supply available in Valleyway, and he has indicated that he is willing to install whatever is required to serve his plat. Sincerely, VER.A WATER AND POWER Ii/ ~Z& . William J. J b Assistant Manager WJJ:cmb ccs: Brent McKinley Paul White Senske & Associates #132.1 ~ ~~950.79 xl~ R E C E I V E AUG 2 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIN6 DEPAR?MENT . ~ R I~ C E 'RI V'E D . Lega1 Description , A'U G ' _ W' ite Transwestern Real ty/Pa,ul h Joib No. 1400, Rai nbow Add1it i, o n, SpOKAN~ ~~UN;; Y,lluly 30, 1979 Pl.A 'NN?l'~f~C' D'~~P~'Rfif~'NT - Al1 of Tract 3 Qf "UERA" and a porti on Qf Tract 4, af "VERA" as per pl at thereof recorded i n Vol' iume "0" page 30 of _P1 ats -in-thei affice of the Spokane County Aud'itor, more speci f i cal 1 y descri bed _as f0lows : _ g Northwesterly of Spokane and Inl arnd~ That portion of saild Tract 4 of VERA, 1yin Em,,pirie Ra i 1lroad ri ght olf way; EXCEP'-T t'he fol~ 1 owi ,ng 2 portions described as fol= lQwS: ~ ~Beiglinniing a,.t the i~~ntersection, of the, West line of said Tract 4 wit,h the Nort~herly • 1 in,e of thie ri ghit of way of the Spo'kane aind l{nl _and; Empire Railiroad Company; t~h~nce, N'iort,h, alonig the 'West line of saild Tract 4., 157 fieet; thence East parall'el w,au- thi the !N~oirth, Ii ne olfi' sa'l'd Tract 4, 280. ~-9 ,feet,, rnore or~ 1' ess, to tlhe 'North~ril y line oIf said ci~ght of way; thence Southwesterlly alon,g tiM Northerly 1 ine of said H-ght of' way to, the poli nit of begiinni nig; ~Beg:inining at tihe intersection of tihe West 1 i~~ne of said" Tract w~~th the N'Qrtberly. 1' i nle of Spokaine and Inl and Empi re Rai1 road: ri g'ht of way; the nce North al1 oing s~i,d West 1 i nie 1,57 fee~t to the firue Point of Begi nni ng tihence East paral' 1'ell v~_i t!h_ ~~hi?,, North 1 i ne Qf sai d~ Tract 4, 210 fe,et; th~~n~c;q ~V'~oirt~h paral 1 el wi th the ~~es~t, l~i?~;n~~~, oy~ , said T"ract, 3$6.8 fee-t, more or liess, to the N'drth li"ne, of .said tract; thencQ•~~ _ W e st al!on g s a i dIN'orth 1 i ne 21, 0 f e e t to t h e No, r tih, west ,corn, er of saii d Tra ct~~r4-~~ th"~~n~,c.e- r. ~ South "ali ong, the West 1 i ne of sai d T"ra.ct z, 3816 .8 fee~t, more or l ess to t~he- e~~~Poi~'n~~t; - of Begfinning,, situate in Sppkane;Co`,uaty, Wash,ington. 1-- - ,.r - . . ; . < , ~ r- ~ - ~ 10"071 •T 1 ~ .Z ' # ~ ~ , z YY ' ~S r s ,^kY f 4 _.,~JOT1 : J . . . , E X H I B I T A , PRFL,IMINARY P'LAT APPLICATI~ rCle ALL SIGNATIIRE BLOCKS CCN PAGES 2 AND 3) MIIST BE F'~ ~ IN~' RIA~, BEF(ZRE RE''ORNING TO THE PLAT ADMIY?sSTRATOR. Y ~ ~ ~ y1ey Part I- To be completed by applic9 ~ AREA, AND DIST.ArTCE*.«****.*****,.***************.~«~******~'~*~'**~****~:*:~**#*~«~.***~►**~~****~* l Total amount of Iand in this Subdivision: 16 ± Acres Tota1. rlumber of Lots 13 Propoaed density of zhe Plat: 0.8 Lots/Gross Acre Tota1 amount of adjoining land controllQd by this owner or sponsor: p Acres Proposes IIse of controlled adjoin.ing land: N/A a I What is the drivin.g distance in. miles to the nearest fire station? 1/4= Shogping facilities? 0 miles Municipal Boundary: 10 mileS Paved street or highway 0 miles ? ~ LAND IISEs*~*.~*~~*s.~~**ss*«**:**,*~*s#~~..:s#*~:::~s.*::**s:~.*«*•*sstr~.***~*****.++v**«~~.s*»: Iaciicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings C Duplexes ( X). Indicate lots for duplexes: see pldt map Multi-family dwelling units ( X). Indicate wh=ch lots: See lat md in. Mobile Homes ( Other ( X). De6cribe other uses: r o lot5 see p a map Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: What is the pxesent use of the property proposed to be platted? List tyve of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: 16 1 acres. Other: Acres Is keepi.ng of a.nimals desired? No ( X). Yes ( Type : I1~IPROV~'SE~TS*'~~`s~*~*****s******~s*#****ssw~*sss~►sss*~~ss~:r*sss~.s+**s*#s:***~**«*ss***f:+*.~i Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or wi11 it be amulti-phase deve- lopment? ma vwi s h _n pL p To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? vravel ( Minamum. Curb and Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( X). Paved only C Describe any combinations of above: What is the time period expected for conplete development of the Plat: 2- 3ye r Street improvements completed? 2-3~~. Substantial number of lots occupied? erdrs Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, atc.) No. (X Yes ( Describe: Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: Square feet Number of bedrooms • Es.;mated Sale Price . Wi l-I buildings be built on the lots befora they a.re sold: No ( X Yes ( Will any special deAd restrictior.s be included in the sale o-f iots? No ;X Yes ( If "yes", explain: IJ~`rL12'~,J*•*:~sss~**s+RSi*►*+~sssts~srs«**s***L=*««F*x*.~:rt*y*t**rt:=:;f:ss:sx*:,.s~k*~x«=t**~**1.t I:dicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank C X)• Lagooa T^eatment plant ( )o Other, or combinatioas (Describe) Ind.icate the proposed source of water sugply: Individual wells ( Public eystem (X _ rivate com..~:unity system ( ) . Indicate method of extending serv-i.ce to the lot3 (Dwellings) : Onder ;rounci utility easemants ( X). Overhead -atility easements ( ir_ stree+s ( ) . tie easemen±s ( ) Indicaze t:e 3is tance f-1•om ;,:ks propcsal -lo t; e nearest eycstwng wate_ ~a~m: :ee,: Indicate size cf nearest main: 67 -nchesa -OVER- E Y H I B I T A PRELIMINARY FLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) pagc- ~ UTII,ITIF:.S - (Continued)s~**~s*********#*r**«s►*~s*s~s**~~s~s~s*s***sss*sr*****r********,.,.~s~:~.s List utility companies or districts expected to provide servi ce to this Plat: 7-lectricity: VQU • Gas: N/ Water: Vera Phone: MB ACKNOWLEDG.M'.,:~ITS.******~~***:*~.*.~*~*,«.*~~,«~*...*.~***~.».*:~*.«,.**#~*.***.:*~.«*~~*«****~ss*:: PROPOSID PLAT tiIAME: I, the undersigi2ed, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has been prepared by me under my supervision " accordance with the requirement9 of the Spokane County ' ng Depertment and the law of the Sta.te =te: (Signed) ~ WASy~ . o (Address) Senske 8~ Associates, Inc. Phone. 924-3759 o E. 980 prague Ave. Spokane, WA Zip; 99206 ~oI s s I, the undersigz►ed, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully a,nd to 4%-,he be st o f my knowledge. I further swear that I AM TIM OWNM OF RECORD of the site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not thE owner, attached here- with is writtea permisaion from said owner authori2ing my actions on his or her behalr. I al so understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full disclosure on my part, Spoka.ne County may withdraw .ec~arat~on oi non Lance tnat _i might issue in rel~.ance upan th' checklist. -~~r ( S i gned ) Date : ~ (5 "-77 r (Address) ~ . 0 ~e : e Phone : ~ZZ' ~ ?~p ~ /~~41 f ziP: T7,?oc ~ . NOTARv Date : 71 ?'10rARY SEAL : sc*~xss~kss►#**********~**M##*****:*sss **rwv*s*s:#~*~ax sxsr:*ss~~+~ts»,c,~#,s+~***ksea,sa~ ~ s t«* sss Part II - to i:e cC.T.TJ1eted by •ra ter Varveu'CI• A. ':,111s Si1tiJc31'd1SiOr (ZS) (3!~'cl Sl t,:.L3tZd w~ t-t11n olL'' SeZ"T,Ce 3rA8, B. We are (able) ( ) and willing to supply _;::uCdivi::ion with adequate water ?or (dome sti c) (fire isi~rs~is~l ) (o ) use s. Satisfactory arrangement (he~w) (have not) been ~:~ade ~ se_ Tie ;~:~is prono~a~. ~ r~ ~ D. Signature (only when items A, B 3 C are true and co le 4ed) << , ~ ~ t L ~~=1'~`i T E f; ~ • I~ ~ ~ ' f'rG. C' purveyors name signa r and title date **fks***~e~s~k#*~*~~~R#ys~#~k#~R#~rk*R~*i~*#R~FR*#~*tM~k~ft~k1#~R#*+ts#~Rtils~s«#s» *s*ih::s•~My#xwa~czw Part III-to be ccmDleted by Health District A. Heal~-,~h District staff has comvleted a field investigation of the 9ite. B. Healt,h District requirements for preliminary pia vP(have nct) been sat-_'s_`ied. C. Si~+.a e T~ D f~ / /0 71". " ___L~ signature and title +R~s+tY*#*ssstsstiaR#R#* R# *iR #i##*#i~t*~MN+~c ~tk#*#~iR#1fi*~It#It~R~t~tsr~~e*satft~c~rc:*r*s~set~~:s~**r#x:fc:*~~ ✓ ~ ~J v . • l. ECEIVED R ExxiBZr a A UG 15 i979 PR~,IMIldARY PLAT . APPLICATIOPi FQRM , SPOKANE COUNTY (Continued) PlANNING OF1PWMINT irilit~*~+t#**l~ty*#~st»tR**fi~~tt~*~M*~t##i**~i*#~~R~#~*~#~~tM~~~i~#t~►*~tM~iiYM~M~~~#~~+tf~*~if*~R~ti~yi~~i*+k#**#~M Part IV - to be completed by Couaty Engineers Office A. County Engineers 4ffice requirements for prelitainary plats have (have n,ot) been satisfied. Sm.biec-T T'6 Arprov&k a4 otr4lNQ.uG P/At A/ i ? . S i giature /kT" 3d1 ? 2 ' gnature and title date s~~**:*~~*s~*s*rss~e~tsssl~~~sss*~+►s*~*~*t~+*s~ssss:*s:s~ys*s#t*+*****t~sss*,ss*s**s*~c~**s*s~w***s Part V- to be completed by County Utilities Dept. A. County Utilities Depart,rnent requirements for preliminary p hav (have not) been satisfied. B. atture ~i ture and tit eW *s**s~rs~as:~ss~ss~*..*+~~*+~#*#~*ss~w*s*ss~~~**s#tss~**:*~**s*~t*~s~s«sss~#ss#s:~s#*x**s♦ ♦ This part to be completed by Planning Departmeat Planninq Department Information 00 Date Submitted : Preliminary Plat Date Accepted: + Checklist Feev 06 ~.1 ~ ~ 1..~f Plat File No. :?F-- 13t{2-'19 Zone Change File No. z~• ~Z~~-'~ 0 Plat Name: &W-bOW o0c6d Existinq Zoning: -Atyl Number of Lots : 13 Date Established : 3/;L 7 144z Location : Sec . / ~ T ~s R ~4~ Advertised Zone Change : ~ - Pt F 5 School District:~'f ( t *am Checked by: K Hearing Date : -Qff ~ •f .3 a , ECEIVEL, 0 5 1979 sPaKANE couNrY r;, t+n,Nlr~/: n~pAQT~,~cp~r . ik ' PRELIMiNARY PLAT CONFERENCE CNECKLIST , j ~ p ~ SN q~RN4Return thi s sheet wi th the Appl i cati on ) ~ d~ L .r?+. Date of Conference: - Z 2 77 _ Sec : f J Twnshp. ~ ~ Range - v ~ E" Total Acres : 13.5 No . of Lots k: a"i K rV G~ Y~ ~ Proposed P1 at Name ~/JCJ ~ ~ J SQOKpNE R.~M~N~ NN,N~ p~p A P~ MPPLICP.~dT' S NAME 1J / ~ AYU Orl4l,1" C - 'Ta »t SL,~ w~ 1 ~ aDDRESS : ~ PHON E : Z i p : THE FOLLOWING COCUMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ACCEPYANCE BY THE PLANNING DEPART- MENT FOR HEARING BY THE PLAhNING COMMISSION, EXPLAINED IN DETAIL ON THE INFORMFiTION REQUIREMEhTS HAND-OUT SHEET: . FULL PRELIMINARY PLAT FEE (g195.00 +$5.00/lot: Maximum 5750.00) - PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE ($240.00 Fee P,equired) PLAT APPLICATION (EXHIBIT A) (All signature blocks complete) -2. LEGAL OESCRIPTiON (EXHI6IT B) (Signed surveyor's stamp) ENGINEERS SECTIOPI MAPS ~~2) (EXHIBIT C) 2(With parcel 1-TO's) 4. ,4SSESSORS SECTION MAP '1) (EXHIBIT 0) ;Show other owned or optioned land; 5. PRELIh1INARY PLAT MAPS l(-63 (EXHIBIT E) (Even scale required) 4- A. 2 r',LACKLINE COPIES (DO_ NOT FOLD BLACiCLINE PRINTS) B.,54 BLUELINE COPIES 6. DEVELOPMENT PLANS (EXHIBIi F) SEWAGE STUOY REPORT (Provide 3 alternatives) A.Z WATER SUPPLY REPORT (Required for wells or new water service) B. STORM WATER ORAINAGE PLANS (If reGuired by Engineers) . LANDSCAPING PIANS (Required when land use conflicts mioht occur) D. ROAD PLANS AND PROFILES (If required by Engineers) .7, ENVIR.ONMENTAL CHECKLIST (EXHIBIT G) ($60.00 Fee Required) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - S-TTF~ REV I EW OF 7MROSiT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - A. UNIQIlE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES:~ouS /0" L B. CUL IrURAL RESOURCES : - . -1"J , C. COWENTS : i,+ ~ ~ ~ ' i T < .V/ wIf,u ' r`~ ~r~'r~~...,~c:j ' :~r,~ ro ~ . , ~ Ddt2 : n dt Ad Stl"3tOr ~ ~ ~ Sewcraqe A1 te fyty F,oq9 ry~, _10 lots ~Z~~~~je~allon pcr day ( eS~• eo d- D"f/cX 230o L. f. drain f ield (e-SfC~92so/D.flef 4q 4 2ee1 Threc alternatives for sewage c3zsnosa1 will be analysed: (1) On-site septic tank (2) Community septic tank (3) Community package treatinent planl-. (1) On-site septic tank CaDital costs !o @ &~o $~~a~ °O Annual costs / Pumping @ ~ year intcrval.s $ 7~D nrain field replacement @ 10%/yr o Total O b M annual costs $ 900. (2) c'ommunity septic tdnk (-F*e MFS 1.1SoiIY) Capiral costs Z ('S,°••G•1•) (Est, ) t(lo&-vo)qal lon mul ti-chamber tank installed $ 2S,oo Li£t station with appurtenzinces Drain field @L. f. 2Z~'6 sewer. age 1 ine gso L. f. @$ 6•00 ~ ~m~ manholcs @ $ ~ c 1 ca n ou t @ $_J~5-o A_~Zo I.oss of lot Annual O & M costs Puinping (Est. ) r• nrain f ield replacement 6'L 300 Perloclic line cleaning ~ Zo• ~ Flectrical & pump maintenance Total 0 & M annual costs $~oto ~ - - ~y a , • - Page 2 ~ A lr ~ (3) Community package treatment plant Capital costs Lift station, aeration chamber, clarifier and chlorination chamber O with necessary appurtenances e oo Drain f ield 2-7o 8" sewerage line 6 manholes cleanout ~~S omo ~Es-/) Loss of lot (2) FS $S6-j7o Annual 0 & M costs, $ ~~oo Pumping clarifier Drain field replacement ~2 ° Periodic line cleaning Electrical, pump and tank maintenance $ Z;D Total annual O& M costs ~ A. a~" ..~'`r ..Lr~:....,.........~ 2Z~8 Dra in f ield @ Q " sewer. age 1 ine Soo L. f. @ $ 6•00 manhAles @ $ ~ clean out C $_15'o I,oss of lot Annua]. 0& Mcosts $ J~oo fN Puiiiping (Est. ) ~ 13mo~`~'f nrain field replacement Periodic line cleanin(j Elcctrical & pump maintenance $ Total O b M annual costs / ~L ~ n . t S S ~ Q ~ ARtlys: S - NO /'tii+ ger w ~tc f 4e%l S t' N'torte/ w.-If be_ 5 e t,l SCwt~ c d"5 P°1$ • . gc~eois 1: Kc S e w e v S e~ v .'~e... weaY 4~ S er~~. 4 f ~ L t ~t fo.- j cZ t1 ..1 4 , r w. frf-% v C K e ~V r 1 °3 C' f 4 tic co,),~ t S -1 e~ r.ttJ a.` lr ~,c! (•T.' c S DG ✓ ~ : : ~ ~,1 0 2 ~ ~ ~ I" !o ~ S t rl c~ d . to ~ S 7- 4 S ~ ~ ~t S '1" N G (,j- d V~ K.f'S t' 1~ ''t~ r~. t'~ a'~ ~v f✓ rc- S Q n.~ vS cwt ~ s[ i v•' ys T k C . y ~ ~•~►t 4~--c, arc S:~~- al ~ S~~ S•~ ~'S rc co wr..~~K.~~ f•' f4e W, ■ - i