The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1337-79 & ZE-196-79 , . , AGENDA; September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PI.ANNIN~ SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIME: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 1:30 P.M. (Item #Z on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor _ N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION PE-1337-79, MAMER ADDITION ZE-196-79, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR R-2 a. Location: East and adjacent to Mamer, west of Evergreen, south of Mission, north of Broadway b. Legal Description: Section 15, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Portion of Tract 100 of Vera; the SW 1/4 of ' Tract 100 except: 1) The N 10 ft; 2) The S 89 ft. and the W 10 ft. of the SE1/4 except: 1) The N 10 ft; 2) The S 89 ft. c. Sponsor: Randy Teeter E 11910 Broadway Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: 8illy J. Tucker E 12721 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99216 e. Site Size: 2.54 acres f. Number of Lots : 4 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings and/or duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or R-2 j. Water Source: Vera Water and Power k. School District: Central Ualley #356 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tank M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." , ' - 5 - \ ~ - rg ~ , ~ ' ~ . ~ \ ~ ~ N \ ♦ ~ . \ \ . ~ \ \ ` I \ 8R IDGE ' x N84501 ' a . . , (11 ' / ~ \ v N N i _ ~'i t ~ • . AVE > • , • 1'' - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ ` ` u/~► GE 04t4 ta GA RDER 1 MISStON AVE. ~ - , . . . ,1-r.-~ ~ . _ - • - • ` j M - ; ~oN 0 ► ~~+~T Q st N V E . 5owt w 0 Y t N i DESMET J)Ej M T O 0 1~ - • , ~ AT AL o C ATA L oC) a ~ ~,►T~► BRIOGE -t&AA.0" N#4506 a m z > AY AVE ~ C dROA►pWAY 14 r + ~ Fire W r ° N ~ StGtIQf1 ~ ~ Ll ~ . w ~ i- iaoo t ~ ' ~ &I K i Av T ~ ~1 •'~lGT~ r o > ~ YALL ~ vALI.EY WAY ~ ~ w~ew ~ ~ , _ . - ~ r Transameric' T'ansnrrierica ~ l -fille Int;urance Comp. Title Insurance Services North 720 Argonne Roar_i~ ~ ~ Spokane, Washington 99206 ~ (509) 922-2222 . s . ~ . l~ ~ ~°o . ~ N CERTIFICATE TO PLAT coF %zy . Order No.: 9733$-M • Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of 14AMER ADDITIOIq Spokane County Planning Commission N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, TrJashington Gentlemen: . In the matter of the plat subriitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such exaMination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to-wit: That portion of Tract 100 of VZRA, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, described as follows: -The Southwest quarter, EXCEPT the North 10 feet, and EXCEPT the South 89 feet thereof; and the West 10 feet of the Southeast quarter , EXCEPT the South 89 feet and EXCEPT the South 10 feet thereof; Situate in the County of Spolcane, State of Washington. VESTED II`l: CAThERINE H. FRANKLITJ, an unmarried woman. EXCEPTIOrIS : l. General taxes for tlze last half of 1979, in the amount o.f $67.57 (Parcel No. 15541-0822). 2. Liability to future assessments by Vera Irrigation District rdo. 15. 3. Contract between Vera Electric Water Company, a corporation, D. K. McDonald, A. C. Jamison, Andrew Good and Vera Land Company, a corporation, dated April 25, 1908, and recorded in Book "H" o.f Contracts, page 292, providirig for construction of ditches, flumes, pipe lines, etc.; with right of ingress and egress to maintain said flumes, pipes, e-tc.; and providing for lien for . unpZid charges for such service. Reference is made to the record of said contract, filed April 25, 1908, as Document No. 200528. 4. Easement disclosed by Taarranty Deecl recorded October 8, 1959, as (rnni- i niin(i ) . ry Page 2 • Order No. 97338-M Document No. 659962B, as follows: An easement for domestic water across the above described property for the benefit of the property adjoining on the East. Records examined to June 26, 1979, at 8:00 A.r1. TRANSAMFRICA TITLE INSUR.ANCE COMPANY BY Debbie Moore . CC: Guthrie Investments dh ~ • t ' ~ ~ • ~M Y ~5W62I S ~f 1►uU" C~ ~y.- I ~ ~ •y►! ~ VUAfZRANIY DEE.D . C ~ : • ` _ ~ .acsADOt M1ra P. HoNll, a w3dw ii~ ~3~ ' , ~'y4. 6+- i 1s.t., {~Tr` r.~`,;`t•' ` af 1efslale ° Connty of 3poksns Statt of llaehiry;t,on ~ N ~ r• YC r i . ~ ~.Y~ V {~~t,~~A ~ ~ fOt sod ia contiaentioa ot TorLr-Iwo Mudred ard Ho/100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dollars. r ~s~~i~^3'.rv~'< v .~s , 1 f~, y/ ia Lind paid. coavtr aad aramna co Ns,t.r Y. rranxlin, - ' ~-''~1►~dw k+ilow►inQ dacribcd t+cal atatc, rituatcd in the County of spokane Statc of Waahington: , ' ~ ~ ' ° Ptirt ot the Fiat Qalt (EI) of the oauth half (S}) ot T'mct One 1{undred_Lip0,) ~ • Q1~~ in LA• Count,~ ot 3pokane and Stete ot flaihingtun, more par4,r"c"u'1~I"~j► describ~d , , l u ibllowa s . B+rLmW at the southweet curner oi trw eaet halt (LJ) ot the •alih halt I '(31) ot sald trratz thenc• north along the west llne nf the eaat, halt (EJ) of the aoatb halt ~Sfl ot sald tract to a point ten (10) tee; south of the north llne of the oaiLb salt 3of sal.d tnotj Lhenc• sast ton (10) teet; thu►ce south to a polat it1 ;k ~ the adttl~ , _ . • • llt~ of sald tcact ton (10) teet *aet of the plac• of beginning; thonco ~ .a ~s ~ 3~?~}~;~''~~:~`',~N,~~~~'•.~:`~ (10) t~ t Lo the p Lc• of boginning. the ~~t halt ~11 ~wYrG► 9 ) of the •outb half (3~ 1) of aaid &ct _On*,H~+~d.._ r~~ .~h r~Y~°• ~:f~~~ ~ (300)--a-Tam. QCZPTDA the north ton (10) ttit in width ot aald weat tsal,t (11J) of ~ !bw soatb balt (3J) af sa,i,d trac t. _ . . - " . . . ~ r Snbjai to Said DropsrV ia inaluded lA tM bounduries oi V.ra Irri.Qation Olatrict acd la mb)ftt Lo bslng uraasod by said Diatriot. • Ea1d prbpsTty 1s Sttol,uded 1n the bovlldarles of Spolcan• Valloy Pire Protection - Dlatriot b_ l, and 1• subjeot Co beLss asseased sald diatriot. ~ SnEjeet toi, ~ai► ~t tor dorsLio water aorys the abote Qqsaribqd nroperty for the ' << Dmatit of th• DroDart+y adjoiniisg oci the ,y~ y " ' _ ~i~`~i~A '•~.y'~, ~/l~1'~~••.z•11~,.•~U-'i••A` y~:p^_?'1"^•~~: T)srcd tbu larentieth daq of Jnly ?~IA ,I ~RO► ♦N ,~~M tf~ . C~A~~'~ . ~J .....'r ~;,.'f,,f•- , o . :,~'"rFf.e~ r f,r• . t~; -Y_. . • y ::L'•F~ : Lj (11t , ~t11[?~ n~ • • • ' I X5 p~ ~ p o~ur►«~ a~ar►r a~ w ~ O , u o un ~w ~ STATS OA -W11dHINGTON. . • ; , COIIaty Of Spolcarfe , • ~ ~ , , _ ~ , ^.'.,,,..,,.T,,* • „ ~e x ~z•T'•' i.;n~'•' ` ' Z;, 'h:,.,at,", I, the nndtnipncd, a Notary ['ublic in and for the above named County and Seate, do heceby '"A`• . ~;~a~ ~ . • .a, i ~+~,s~ -.,a~`: w - ttttifj► chat on this 20th day of Ju1y 19 42 pccsonallq appearrd bcfore me ' , B1►elyn P. Howell, a •ldvw • ,Y ~ T , : . 'Q' V ~ .wr1'' ~.t ~J ".ly I .h. r,. '~4°, M ~ Y o' 4 w}r r• , ~e»~F . ` ' . W ,cn ~to be the individual deacribed in and who executed the within instrument, and ~ ~ `+a~`'''•• - she •igned and cealcd the amc at her frce and volunary act ind detd. • .,N , . ~ • 1 ' . . ~ tQ,~%Jltepoxi herein mentioned. `C° - • ' 3 ` , , . .J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 V......._ . . o a" hand and official eeal the day and year last abovt writun. . ; rfJ1 ~ • .j.1~f; . ~ , 't ° _~,rs•~~~' ~ - - . ~ . Noury nblic foc State of WaahinQtoa. t . ' ' Residing ac_._Opportuaity ~ ' ~~~i' ° ` . . • • ~ • , y►m'~' »1'~: -~r. +r.., .,u ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ -F i :~Z~yr~~. { ~ ~ R,fy.~„~'4,V ~!Ni •a4',;~ f,~ ~ !xt.~~ d ~ D . . . • ~ ~ M 'L '~ti J~AyI•4'T~4 l''Y'Ill~(:5~~ 1'!'t.~j~" ~^y"~,..•'s;~ ' . L.~~~, ' i . ' , , , . 'i'~j` ° hro` 0 '"11 ~ G~ ;~1 .i~b ♦.7~r '~t4`j~, ' '7~, Y r'"ii,~a' S~ • ~ ~~~i.~~ f ~ tj~ ~r , , . 4t-• .:.w1;'..i.~fb'i'> " s / : :.a a V1 . ~ . ~ • , ~ j'4 • '"d" ~.~~~J~t2 ai~'~~~?G~%," ~F t a~ e~~;~ 1., ~~,Dt!~~''' ~i5~~1N:;" ~ - v ,o~`~'~'v ~F ~ ia ' 'Y ~ ,~b ' i^~ . • ~~'ti~'~ y 4t ~ A jRyr ~ L' ~ ~ ~q1V~ ,,i'i ~ M~ ~ w ,..1 i ~ ~ C~i: , .r a. . • R . ~ • , ~ • ~ • > ~ ...,-..~.w . . , . ~ t.~...l►w~►~ r' ~ . , ~ ' - • ~ . , . . , , . tt ~ . , i . , t q " -r • ' ~ ~ .'a9. ~ •e . • . • . . . . . . „ ~ . , r . . '1. , . o-,,.. . . • . • 4 ' . . ' ' -4j . t ' . ~ • ;`+'i. . . • ~ •K.. _ ~ . . . . ~r . . a . a , • , s ' . , { r !Y 000000 ~ / C CO Y ~ ~ 3~3•b~ . 14 ~i oA " ,.;t. _ ' ~ ' • 1 I- :`1' c, 13:z~' ~ 3°O o a ~ . .,9 4 ~~+tt _ IIY, w ~ . , l,,y~,q.•`'` ' ~ , • , ` ~ 14 ' ~p t ~ ~ . . r ~ . 1 0: a ~l .e eio n ~ ! ' . '"~o~- ~ ~ ' ct ► ~ . . ' ~ ~ ~i• ~j , ~ , . f, 1~ ? I~YU~ G~ ! ~1~~ [~,,,~j ✓ • ' -g,. r - - ~ ~aM,~ AN~c. , . ~ ~ - , A _ ~ wl • ~ANc~ l c. ~ , , . ~I~ S1SlE 1~tS~ R ~ 1 ~ . o~ MA -RIOp, ~E ~ aR~ ~ SQ ~ i ~ . Y f^~►;"'~"~ ~ ~ j ♦ , ~ ~o ~ ~ , , 12.1 e ~ + ~he F~tG ~ ~ m~► pt3 ~ ~ ' ~in1Y t°~ mp t~y pssu s prmt is m s„ e the ~~0 ~ • - . , r;~11St {15 cc o ~ e • . i~C` 1t1 Qist~Enz ny . titIL S n~. j , . t ' ? • 1 ~ . , • ~ ~ , , . 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ • + '"79 JL BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, PE-1337-79, MAMER ADDITION; ZE-196-79, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR R-2. WHEREAS, The Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Committee did, after public hearing on September 28, 1979, take action by motion that the preliminary plat to be known as MAPIER ADDITION (File No. pE-1337-79) be DENIED; and, WHEREAS, Arthur M. Noll, E 12721 Sprague, Spokane, Washington, representing the sponsor, Mr. Teeter, did request a special hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and testimony against the motion of the Hearing Examiner to the above described prelmininary plat and zone reclassification; and WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners did hold a public hearing on November 13, 1979, to consider the Findings and Order of the Hearing Examiner and testimony and request of the plat sponsor, objectors and other interested parties; and, WHEREAS, At said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above described preliminary plat proposal and zone reclassification, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the testimony given, the Findings and Order of the Hearing Examiner, the environmental checklist, and all other evidence presented, and further having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the con- clusions of the Hearing Examiner were generally valid and sufficient. NOW, THEREFORE, The Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the preliminary plat to be known as MAMER ADDITION and zone reclassification upgrading to Agricultural Suburban or R-2 should be and hereby is DENIED. DATED THIS DAY OF ~ 197y• BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKAPJE COUNTY, WASHINGTON . RAY W. CHRISTENSEN, CHM. JERRY C. .K4PETI HARRY MAARNED ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND C1 f Board By : ' t . r" BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMP-iISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHIPJGTON Ifd THE h1ATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUaDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) PE-1337-79, MAh1ER ADDITION ~ C0MMISSIONERS' DECISION ZE-196-79, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL ) SUBURBAN OR R-2 ) Sponsor: Teeter ) This being the time set by the 6oard of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington to render its decision concerning the request of Randy Teeter, East 11910 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification; and The Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee having heard the above request on September 28, 1979 did deny said application; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on November 13, 1979, at the request of the sponsor, Mr. Teeter, represented by Arthur M. Noll, East 12721 Sprague, Spokane-, 14A. 99216 and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to uphold the Hearing Examiner Committee's action to deny said application. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter. BY ORDER OF TNE BOARD this 26 day of November, 1979. " VEP.NON W. D Clerk o he oard by : o anne on ague, Deputy 1 k ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY CUMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) PE-1337-79, MAMER ADDITION ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZE-196-79, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL ) SUBURBAN OR R-2 ) SPONSOR: TEETER ) NOTICE IS HEREQY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M. ON NOVEMBER 13 1979 at its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above-mentioned preiiminary subdivision and zone reclassification on the following described property: Section 15, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. Portion of Tract 100 of Vera; the SW 1/4 of Tract 100 EXCEPT: 1) The N 10 ft; 2) The S 89 ft. and the W 10 ft. of the SE 1/4 EXCEPT: 1) the N 10 ft; 2) The S 89 ft. East and adjacent to Mamer, west of Evergreen, south of Mission, north of Broadway. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition to an appeal on said matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 15 day of October, 1979. VERNON W. OHLAND CLERK OF T~E BOARD. - ~ - ; . b le~i(-: Rosanne Montague, Deputy Cle ~ . s..i JV L 1 V Ii1 l • TO THE BOAIZD OF COUNTY COPil•IISSIONERS . - . • , . Appeal Fee - $75.00 . Name : Rand,y Teeter Today' s Date 10/8/79 (Please Print) Address : E. 12721 Sprague = Spokane, Washington Zip Code : 99216 Home Phone : 926-9151 Eusiness Phone : 926-1561 Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: riamer Addition Preliminary Subdivision Number : PE -1337-79 Zone Reclass if ication Number : ZE - 196-79 Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action : September 28, 1979 Signature: Signature of Authorized Representative : Addr e s s: E. 12721 Sprague ; Spokane , Washington 99216 92b-1561 ~ YOUR REAS013S FOR APPEAL 7. The action by the Hearing Examiners Committee was inconsistant with the Planning Staff recommenndations. y . 2. The finding of fact by the Hearing kxaminers Committee that the proposal was too dense for the area., did not properly consider the the alternative for single family residences and only considered the proposal for duplexes. OFFICE USE ONLY Copies to: Planning naineers Environmental Health E Fee Rec Cash Receipt Number ~3~3 ~ eived: Check / , Hearing Date: `7 Sp r9~ - r VA''. --/L--M DEPARTIALN. EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKAN[, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 September 24, 1979 Ma rc i a Ra i n es Spol:ane County Pl anni ng Coirnni ss ion 1",1721 Jefferson Spokane, l,lashinqton 99260 Dear Ms. Ra i nes, The fol 1 owi ng zone classi fi cations for upqrading fiave been revi ewed for fi re protecti on : PE-1333-79 h"axwel1 Addition ZE-210-79 [-1cKin1 ey P E-1334- 79 "I i ca Vi ew 3rd Addi ti on 7E-192- 79 Ri ce PE-1 335-79 Lucy's 11ddi tion LE-1 93- 79 Scri bner PE-1336-79 A►ale Addition ZE-195-79 Le3lanc VZPE-1337-79 R1amer Addi tion ZE-196-79 Teeter Ma i ns and h.ydrants need to be instal 1 ed iR the above areas. Access plans for firefiqhting equipment around the buildina shall be approved rrior to building permit issuancc. Sin r y, - - ~ ~ . , Al CUUIC Lt. of Inspectors AC : s►i 1 ~ ' ~ PKEVENI' , F IR~~5 ~ ~ - - SAVE L I Vf,~ A ~ 1-:le NO. PE-1337-79 ZE-196-79 • SPOKANE COUNTY . HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on September 28, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairperson, Jane Myers, and Pau) Sceva, Jr. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Randy Teeter, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and zone change, PE-1337-79, Mamer Addition and ZE-196-79, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban or R-2 for subdivision of 1.7 acres into 4 lots for single family dwellings and/or duplexes and there being present, the following applicant or representative: , ~ RANDY TEETER C. FtNDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is vacant. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as residential usage. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. ' S. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 1 . ~ ~ e No. PE-1337-79 Z E-196-79 6. That the lar) cl in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the proposed use is incompatible with existing uses in the area. 8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is detrimental to the general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety, and welfare. , 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The ' following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) Density is not suitable for the area. D. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Randy Teeter for a preliminary plat, Mamer Addition and a ione change as described in the application should be denied. Motion by : Myers Seconded by : Sceva, J r. - Vote: Unanimous HEA~F NG EXAMINE~2 OMMITTEE , ~ C h a i rm a n • - i ~ ~ ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director B y : 2 ?-r' ~.~:_:G S~, , . CC:~~•~~.: PJBL_TC 1EA.F I°G P'ica L=:,-: Na. ~~-1 33 z ~ 9' -7 4 ~n :y~~ .r.~CC:..at ' •yt•, ~ 1 ,.3 .,~p ..r _ v. _ A co~"ii f~. (•'~'?C-{ ..~'~~G _ ...~C w . ~ .~..1 t ~ !L. v ~ rT*~:,* ► J. y 'S` ~ _ n ✓V ~ ~J . ~ l V•.i v ~ ~ l+ ~.a L~ . ~ ai-. . ~ ~ i :'a.:.e brtA, ~ • ~ tG _ - T /1; ~ 1 'T'"~ T', . C ; _ • 77 PUi~L,IC E-:,~? r?G . AD-1*' ca44on ,.o. rf-- /33 An-1=ca.^ "v, TC e Df -u? c ? =.':e ;,~D be c_^. : aco: d =r (Check or.e). i I ~ 1 :'O7 . , R ='*-►T'?.t..1r ..0 v^~.~ ~-....7 r v 'j ~ : i?...:,.° Ola3s° k4d M aZi1 eR -51, , 2.f,,~ c:r , ~ p.,~^ _ r •L~ r ~ 1r~ ~ r~ . ~ ~r ~ 'r i r AMle ':aA..T; c ~ i~. ~l; ~:.~0.r, . .,0. ~ p r'~~~Z ~Cal^_~ ~'~E•~ I T•rculkd to ce o: -recc= d _n ~'r-."rec ; :mn ) . ~ l - x;IG: ; • Qp7(` c ~.r*t-~ ...l/*• ~ .fv~lL1 ~ 1! J ~..:t_ . Cbl t~ :Y..JII j'.n ~ ~ A _J , l ..v r ° v ~ / ~ ♦ i G• /~S ~u :MEA=-m-jG -M:E.c. CG'.•-.~."~'"T'c"~ 1:a~rG r 7 ~ M s. ; ~ _ ~ ` . ♦ ~:oLl:t I I:a V7 JA O:~ r°C31"i lil ';,.'1£Ct: v:l? ~ . ~ ~ A ~i O..~ ~ : R OPPO~~'^i~ ' f , ~.T ~ .r~.... ~ ~I ~ • I r ~ ~ J ~ V ~ ~ ~ lr r ~ ~ ~ ~ r • :i0 . -'a=°- =9 a~~ ?r_,.~ ~ • _ - .z1 lD e~ ,,yt,~••~ / Fr..'B Li`i ii LRT"j~ll.' A-pl_CZ.': t ~L be li:: r°ca^.rd C/`^ ^t 1 .IllA\.{ ~:1G~ ~ • X -lOR o / " / ..e a ^►:r c ~ a. aa.. ~ ~ ~...r -A S s ~ ~ ~ T ~ }~R1 !~l !7•/~•~~•~.~•~ :~.a~~~ r. ~ •~.i~ ~vV~. J~a~~l~+~ ~TwrLl V ~iD C z -~.0.'1 Y, 0 =m'Jr.:C?..r: v : _ L._L~ ' - .•v I~_e be on : ecord C:zec~t lone OP^CS":1T11C:; . _ • r,+--~ j ~ A. s. • ' r+ ~ J r r_C.... ~ S ,~j ~ ~~•f~`~- l j ' ~f ~ ! ~~RrNG H- Mc0r I.I_~ - PU?,.; :LRL`:G alicat_or. Yio. - ~U7 : ^JJ~T T - C ?r . ~ _ ..~^..U~r4 4•:e l..f. .~.'A .~ri:- rpCvid ~.a v~.?Cl: o ~ • ~ OPPG..;_'~w, r' ~ ~ ~ :~~'_'~►fil. Do ~ ~u ? : to :a-3r"t--2g? ~ ,r 3) ~ ~ ..G . }='i"1'v~ Otl-240l~ -t ~ _ 1y . ' P E T I T x 0 N . w - lui k ~ To : Spokane County Planning Comnti s s ion Subject: PE-1337-79 Mamer Addition We, the undersigned, do strongly object to this above referenced application submitted by Randy Teeter, E. 11910 13roadway, and respectfully request the Connnission deny said application on the P-rounds attached hexeto and made a Fart hereof: Years NAME ADDRESS PHONE Res. Lot Size 2. ~ L. ,1 ~ 'I ~ ~ / _ / ~ ~ ~/~~;~~J ~~i.! ~ e 4l~ a ~J l~ ~ a~ ~~`iL,C•~/ C - 3 . • '';tY ~`7 4. j i ~ , _ ~ _4 . f✓ . r R Y 5i~~j , ~~t.~' . c- .~~1~ <~~~w•=~ ~ /~~,~~~~~~~~'/t~.~J~ ~ _ r nv~ f~J ( ~ 7~,` / : ~ ~ . `7L ~ f ~-i- , ~,i ~ ~ 7. ~rn~ ~~2~~ - . ~ ~ r ~ e 8. e L ~ -t? . ~"v~/ ,~~~d ~ ~ , 9. C_i • 2~ C~•-yu, ' ~ ~ ~ A 10- ~~Y/`'/J"h- oe, 11. 1 ~.1~~~ ~ L ~ ~ ~ ~ • l 12 / , ~ 13. 1-, ~ ~ 4 ~ . ~ . 14, ,-•vE~ ii~ ` " /~'/i ~'~~/~/.s~/Y/c! ~ - ~3% 5~ ~ ~ F~' Clc u~ / , w (2) Years NAME ADDRESS PFiONE Res. Lot Size 15. AJ . / ~~-'t/ ~~~L~L/7d ~ / =~C F~ •-~•J l ~ ~ Y~'~~ . ~o /``cc. ~ 16. `-e > 5 f ,2- 3 17. J - ° ~ iY ~.¢C ~`c' _ C~GG- c-7 :2- ~ c3 19. _ • , 7 A/,~~ ~ 20. • . 21. ~ ~r~,.,.~:~.~ e ~ - ~'1 o~~~`t./ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ . f ~ 22. ~ Cp ~f ✓ l~~~s, : ~ ~ ~/'l c ~-yz c. e._~ ~ ~ ~5' ~ / c' c~ z . , . / . T~,~' 5 ~ ~1~ 5'= ~ va y `2 ~ , ~ 2 y . ~ . ~ 25. /2 Lz~. ~ . / , ~ ~,2 ~ • 5"~ ~ ~ 27 _ ~ 26. ~ _ \ ~.7 . ~lf~ Il / ~i. c~ 29. YwIA 3C.n. 31. 32. 33 . ~ P E T I T I 0 N . i To: Spokane County Planning Commission Subject: PE-1337-79 Mamer Addition ZE-196-79 Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban We, the undersigned, do stoutly object to this above referenced application submitted by Randy Teeter, E. 11910 Broadway Spokane, Wa., and respectfully request the commission deny said application on the grounds attached hereto and made a part hereof: length 1nt NAME ADDRESS PHONE °f size res. ` o , • r ~i~~ . ~ 1C'`,72C'.~ ~ ~ _ ~ . 1 ~~~j f ~7 C~ r', c: > 7.~:' /O ~C e.y . . . !k~ . i'/ V'~ ~ L~i~~z.. ~,~7 ~ 1✓~ ' n~, i:' " - 4„~i o ~ i , • , r~~ / ~ I ~ ~ J _ ~ ~ ~ 70 ~ . ~ . 9,.s 1. Q 11, 1 l3t 14,~ 1 t~ * , - ✓ . . „ s STATEMENT or- OPPOSITION The majority of people residing on Mamer Road between Broadway and Mission purchased their property for specific reasons - the most important one being the availability of acreage. The open space and quietness of the area and small amount of local traffic were other contribu'ting factors. Most of the residents have a minimum of two acres of land - some have four or more and most of them use -this land for cattle and/or horses. The agri- cultural zonirg is very important to us. It is a possibility that a change in the zoning could eventually prohiba.t future land use for our animals and alter our lifestyle. We are concerened that the quality of the proposed structures -to be built on the site in question would have a serious impact on the surxounding land values. Tt is reasonable to assume -that the developement would not be in keeping with the values of the existing homes. Multiple farnily units will have transient type occupants - somEOne living there just long enough to find a perrnanent home in a less crowded area. We believe this development would lead to a low-income type of environrnent - a condition that no one would like to ha.ve in their neighborhood. In rEViewing the lei~gth of residence of the present home owners, we found that the neighborhood has a very s-table population - many people have lived here for over 20 years. Another problem that would surface with eight additional families is the increased traffic. Most families have more than one car, many also have boats, trailers and motorcycles. We ar.e anxious to prevent a situation like the one that has been allowed to develope an East Mission between Best and Sullivan. We would like -to }anow the exact description Of thE land to be used for this c. project. According to our measureinents there are 1.72 acres. The proposal mentions 2.5 acres; we question this. . ~ ' G I ' " ' . ♦ . ~ ~ - 2 - It is the feeling of the neighborhood that one single farctily dwelling per acre is all that shoulcl be allowed an this area. This would be in balance with the lifestyle on Mamer Road and be an asset to cuxxent property values - not a devaluation. If this opposition statement sounds familar it should. On April 25, 1978 we faced the exact situation on the same piece of property - the only difference being a proposal for eight single family homes. The pre- sent proposal ca11s for four duplexes - still eight fami.lies - the end result being the same'.t In conclusion it is still the feeling of all persons signing this petition against the re-zoning that the changes would sharply lower our land values and restrict our right to a quiet and peaceful neighborhood such as now exists. We believe -that this project wou.]_d have adverse environmental impact on the area. > c: . . ~ , AGENDA, September 28, 1979 TELEPHONE: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARIPJG EXAMINER COMMITTEE TIh1E: Friday, September 28, 1979 - 1:30 P.M. (Item #2 on Afternoon Agenda) PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor _ N 721 Jefferson, Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECL.ASSIFICATION PE-1337-79, MAMER ADDITION . ZE-196-79, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR R-2 a. Location: East and adjacent to hlamer, west of Evergreen, south of Mi ssi on, north of Broadway b. Legal Description: Section 15, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M. Portion of Tract 100 of Vera; the SW 1/4 of ' Tract 100 except: 1) The fV 10 ft; 2) The S 89 ft. and the W 10 ft. of the SEl/4 except: 1) The PJ 10 ft;, 2) The S 89 ft. c. Sponsor: Randy Teeter E 11910 Broadway Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Surveyor: Billy J. Tucker . E 12721 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99216 e. Site Si-ze: 2.54 acres f. Number of Lots: 4 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings and/or duplexes h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural i. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban or R-2 j. Water Source: Vera Water and Power k. School District: Central Valley #356 l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tank M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this Hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared." -5- \ . r~\ ` \ • \ N _ \ BRiOGE ~ ' NR4501 N pV E 2 N . ~ t: - - ' , • . , 1 ` O , . . ' ~ ~ \ \ v//I t ~ y . ■ ' ~ G E N~a ~ MiSSioN q v E. - ~ GQ RDER or - 5 wrt < . . W 0.2 ~ LN N UE Y a 3P40. J ' • N ~ ~ sw.~A• j ; ~ DESMET• . i ~ ~ ~ATAL O C q. ~ TA L DU ~ w q i ao UTI► • IRIDGE j°' 0 Nt4506 , AY ~ m AVE. O . . ku 14 r eROAowAY o + p ~ ■ ~ p 1~ { Fire ~K i Av 1004 s+ation Z ~ . j p r ~ ~ 410 ',;~lCT r p ~ ~ o ~ ~ , - V A L L, E N W A Y ~ VA L LEYW~ ~ a ~ a ON ~ ~ al • r . i Mrwew ' ~ ~ STAFF ANALYSIS - September 28, 1979 PE-1337-79, MAMER ADDITION ZE-196-79, AGRICULTURAL.TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. History This proposal was heard in April, 1978 as Poochies Addition. The proposal consisted of eight (8) lots and was denied by the Planniag Commission. It was subsequently appealed to the County Commissioners, but final action never occurred and the plat was dropped by the sponsor. The property has been sold and this sponsor is now proposing 4 lots for the same area. B. Location Mamer's Addition is situated in the Spokane Valley, south of Mission Avenue and directly east of Mamer Road. C. Proposal - 2.54 acres subdivided into 4 lots for single family or duplex use - Lot frontage = 166 feet - Lot size = 15,106 sq. ft. . D. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, as well as all nearby surrounding lands, with no density designation. D. Land Use Analysis: 1. Existin~g Land Uses The site is vacant with no significant topographical problems. The general area has been developing into residential subdivisions such as Gutherie's Valley View Additioas to the southwest. The immediate area between Evergreen and Blake Road south of Mission consist of segregations of 10,000 sq. ft. lots up to 5 acres. 2. Compatibility with Existin$ Land Uses The proposal appears to be compatib).e with the lot sizes in the area particularly regarding the existing subdivisions in the area and the smaller segregations along Mission Avenue directly to the north. -5B- OW ~ STAFF ANALYSIS - September ^-O, 1979 EER ADDITION - continued II. SPECIAL INFORMATION A. Circulation (Not received at time of printing) (See Engineer's Memo) B. Sewage Disposal The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage dis- posal means; including on-site septic tank disposal, treatment plant and sewage lagoon. For economic reasons, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engi.neer feels on-site septic tanks should be utilized. The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The District states that an on-site sewage management system should be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 8 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments: Impact Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 4 lots on 2.54 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact , on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd coasidered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by the plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background. - 5C - i ' ST'AFF ANALYSIS - Septer- c 28, 1979 - MAMER ADDITION - continued ti - - - The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 9.6 to 1.7 ppm. A projected ' incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in a range of 1.04 to 1.8 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage ZiispQSal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps moreto obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. 2. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a conventioaal subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor cammunity acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive thaa those for septic tanks and drainfields. C. DrainaRe _ The County Engineer reports that the preliminary storrn drainage plan submitted by the applicant indicates that on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County Engineer and Health District prior to the final plat filing. D. Water Supply The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Vera Water and Power District. The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and • irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1. The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to review and approve final fire flows and water plans. - 5D - ~ • STAFF ANALYSIS - September 1979 1ER ADDITION - continued F. Schools Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District. G. Parks The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates no plans for a county park in the immediate vicinity. H. Unique Environmental Features None have been indentified. I. Cultural Resources Idone have been indentified. III. ZONING ANALYSIS This property and the surrounding area are currently zoned Agricultural. The sponsor is requesting duplexes on all lots and to accomplish this has proposed either R-2 or Agricultural Suburban zoning. There are several duplexes along Mission approximately 200 feet to the north and if the proposal is approved, the staff would recommend R-2 zoning. IV. ENVIRONMENTAI, REVIEW An Environmental Checklist was submitted by the sponsor and has been reviewed by the Planning staff. No significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air; water; flora; fauna; noise; light and glare; land use; population; housing; transportation/circulation; public services; utilities; and energy. The Planning Director issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance, and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. V. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any oae lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. 3. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the Continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) -5E- ` + ' STAFF ANALYSIS - SepteQ" - 28, 1979 - MAMER ADDITION - continued 4. That appropriate street names be indicated. 5. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 6. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the purvepor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 7. That a certificate of titie be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 8. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to October 1, 1980. 9. That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval, or any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340. NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320. 10. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer. 11. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. - 5 F - . r r STAFF ANALYSIS - September 1979 fER ADDITION - continued ~ 12. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer and Spokane County Health District for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 13. Coastruction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, wha shall - be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the Couaty Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 14. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the Countp Engineer. 15. All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer. 16. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 17. That each lot be authorized for the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. 18. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district. Special Conditions 19. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of Countq Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirtp (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. 20. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to R-2, Two Family Residential. 21. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an extension of time to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies. 22. That the Hearing Examiner Committee sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recomsnends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. 23. That a public water system serviced by Vera Water and Power, and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. - 5G - ''SZ'AFF ANALYSIS - Septer ~ 289 1979 ; MAMER ADDITION - continued 24. That an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of 8 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. 25. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer aad the County Health District. 26. That the plat dedication contain the statement: "Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 27. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi- cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. -SH- FI{• ' ~ ; Sec. i~7 - -T-,sh,p Rlge - Clacsification t"C z , Proponont YMAi ng, { ~-.v~ y ~-~r r~~! •JNI ♦ •.Ir .4.A1 nt,uil ~ ' ~3~~ ~~tT~, . . T N R E 5 H O L O O E T E R M 1 N A T I O N Proposed/ DECLARATiON OF Non-significant (proposed/finai ) (signiticance/non-siflniticance) , 1. Description ot Proposal 6F L f ~ <'1 C'~ ~ ~ U+~ w 2. Proponent : I kt" ti/ -t~ e- r-eE.~. 3. Contact Person: ,'t- . -~--ucoteme,.e Phone: 4. County Action(s) Requested: L._ Zone Chang• ° Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Chango ot Condition Other : 5. Location of Proposal : ~ v10..~£.~4-0 4e v rtf ojc=' miss~ o~ u1J AJo.c~ o f' _J°',eW'JcAl•!-Y. 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON This propasal has been determined t,o not have a significant advers• impact on the environment. An EIS is not requireci under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). T h i s deci s ion was rnad• after review by the County of a completed environmental checkiist and othor Information on filo with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Officiai : Proposed Dectaration : F ina! Declaration : Name Fred L. Dayharsh Name . Signature~f'j-U` Signature , Title Planning Director Title Depdrtment Current Pl anni ng Department , Date September 12, 1919 Date September 27, 1979 Revised 6/1/19 ~ r . 51)0KA.NE VALLEq FIRE DEPARTIAENT EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 September 20, 1979 a11y Hubbard Plat Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission Second Floor Broadway Centre Puilding N721 Jefferson " - Spokane, Washington Dear Mr. Hubbard, The following prelimir}ary subdivisions & zone classification for upgrading has Peen reviewed for fire protection: PE-1328-79 ' PE-1335-79 PE-1333-79 , PE-1336-79 PE-1334-79 ~E-1337-79 Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting. equipment shall be approved . prior to building permit is-su,ance. n ~ . ~ o k : , • . Lt. of Inspectors , AC : sn o' ~ ~ PRE VENT FIRES SAVE LI VES . ~ : ~ . .F`ikl , . ..,h,ir' " R • . . • OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER ; SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ooft Iater-offica Commwucotion e . . , To PI•ANNING LEPARTMENP GARY KENNALY t PLANN ING & TAAFF IC DIV I3 ION ENG INEER Sub*e_PAD CO UWIOVS * M$ PI.AT P C 133 ~ Mcx.w%cr.,r a~l r,Q *OONDIT IOHS C IRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNIaER CONS ILIERAT ION ' - - -(IMIC RrOAD STANDARD§)- - - PRIVATE ROAD STANDARD9 - - - . ' ~ *that aonditiooal approval of-t'he plat ia given subject to dedication o! Right ot Way an! •pproval of the road eyetem in the plat by the County Engiaser; , ~2}that plaru, profiles, and croes eectione ehvaing propoaed etreet aentorlino aad o~'b inrade• ba •ubsitted to tlyr Couaty Enginesr tor approval prior to conetruation aad the tiliog af a, liqfikl Flat i : 3 thr►t draiaage plane ard desiga aalculationa ehoWing the grade• aad alignmeot ot draiosp- 'laoilitiee bs aubmittad to the County Enginesr for approval prior to aonetruotion aYrd ths ' liliag of a iinal platz ~ • : vithin the progoeed public streete and eaeempate slya]rl be pertormed wnder tko , diroot •uperviaioa of a liceassd land aurveyor, uho ehall bs responsibls tor perpetuatiag all evidence of the locatioa of •urvey moaumsats wbich mdy be distuurbsd dusing aonatruatioa yb+o ahall turaiah thg County Eagiaaer with "Aa Huilt" plane and a certiflaats ia writiag tbat all iWroiemeat• wro inatalled to the liass aad grades shoWa on the approwd oonatrwvtion plaae and that all disturbed monumente have been reRlaaed j . : ao conatruction work 1s to bo performsd withia the Publio Aight ot' Way unLil a perait ha• beeY iesued by tho Couaty Eagiaser. A].l work ie subject to inapootioo and approval by tba Courity Enginser= Y ~ 11 conatrurction within the Public Right of Way ie to be aonpleted prior to t'iliag the final K~ plat or • boad la theaaount •etimated by the Couuty Engineer Lo oover the coet of conetructic of improvoiuats, aonstruatioa aartif icaLion, "Ae Huilt" plane, and sQaumeatipg tho street coAterlines sbtll be filod with the Cowaty Engineer; , 9 7-no direot acoss• from loto to 1/2 Right of ways until suah roade ars aonstructod to Couaaty ' 3tandarda waW sstablisted Couaty Aoade; . E 8-no dirsct acces• from lots to Stub Road conaectione until eucb road• are coaatructed Lo Countj 3tandards and setablis2ud ae County Roade; E 9-road deeign, aonatruotion, and drainage cootrol for 1/2 Rights of Ways aad 8tub Rosd aon- ructions are the reeponeibility of the Developer; E10-that the spoaeor ahall propare aad aubmit Lo the Couaty Enginser a design proposal acoeptablo to the State Highway Department of the propoeed StQte Kighway-County Aroad iutersactioa.. Stats Highway Dspartmeat approval of the propoeed deeign auet bs received prior to the filing of the f inal plat. Improwarnte to the State HighWa,y are to bs the reeponsibility of the Spoaaor and may eithsr be ccaetructed or a bond to cover the coet of auah improvaaaata ' furniahsd to the Coutity Eagineer in the amount se determiwd by tks Couaty Emgisuer aad tho State Hi hway DspartmeAt. GL3G 1-that a roade within the plat be curbed and/mr paved Lo tko epecificatioua ot the County Engineer. Ecieting Couaty roade providing direct acosee to lote of the plat qhall bs p4ved and/r curbod to the atsndards of the County Engineer. E12-Proposed priveto road(e) aerving lota with: no exteneion poeaible; extenaLon to e'rw 8 or leae lote; tuture public Right of Way Lract. ' E13-that private road(s) be iqproved to etendard adopted by the Hoard of Couaty Coamiaoionere. . &no direct aacess fron lota to OvlA4-w^C- . b-dedioation o! )c:-"/vE A2FE T additioral Right of Way along (16 buat the owner, hie Qranteee arld aaeigne agree to participete in and not oppoee or proteot an RID on M~-•~ 2o~Q . ✓ oF ID~~~ . ~ . ~~~~I"Y spoy . C EV2~ - ~ ~ P-t- to From Subiect l 1 ~ ~ File # ;:':3,~7 - 7~' 79 ~ . i i • ~ ~ Sec. /57 T'sh' p o~ S R'ge Classification c 3 r'V u i. ~ ~ Proponent 7'eefe ~ STAFF EtTIE!U QF NVLRQ NENr L_ CKE_r,Ki ST I. Ln accordance with the Spokane County F.tiviconmental Ocdinance 'and WAC 197-10 . an Environinental Checkli9t has bven subniitted by the applicant or his aqent. Thi9 check119t nd any ad itional pec~t3nent data has subsequently baen caviewed ~r~ by the ~+'j~A~Jr~g e.Q:qt, The followinq data bciefly describes [he pcoposal: A. Action (3) Requested: & Zone Chanqe; & Prelirriinary Plat Approval: Final Plat Appcoval; Chanqe of Condition Other: B , Description of Proposal: p#cr es j FJ fo ~i4I~e✓ 4'4~e. (W'*ly u~~r ItK C. Location of Proposal: '1!!~ '4d4 Ekjefg&rj1 S• p~ 111S„501 0 D~ ALaN! I~ U. Review of Checklist:, A. Sliqht adverse impaccs are nated undar the followinq questions: (1) ~ Earth (8) ~ Lan,d U9e (15) ~ Energy (2) Air (9) Natural (16) Utllities Re9ources (3) W3ter (10) Risk of (17) Huruan Upset Health (4) ~ Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (5) X Fauna - (12) ~ Housinq (19) Rec. (6) ~ Noise (13) Trans./ (20) Arch.! Circ. His t . (7) x Llqht & (14)A , Public (21) Other Glare Secvices .r siqnific3.nt advecse impncts are noted under the fallowinq 8. Potentiall- ques Lions : ~~N ~ ReviseC 6;'1/79 C. Discus sion of impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review af the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Con ra are no potentially siqnLficant adverse impacts a recomrnends/i sues a proposed declaration of nonsiqnificance. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts B. and, because of the nature of the oroposal, recommends/issues a f.inal declaration of nonsiqrificance. C. Cancludes that potentially siqnificant adverse impacts do exist and recommend s/is sues a declaration of siqnificance. IV. S taff inembe r( s) reYi ewi ng checkl i st , . ; PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ 6p0ADWAY CEMTHE BUIIOtNG M 721 JErfERSC)N STfiEEt ~ . ~ PriCi}rf 456-2205 Si'()KAHE dVASNliifiTl)►i 99160 !10"nl GO~nt• GJUNt n~u3f CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1. DOE 6. School District #3..✓ (Reg. Off 2, Spo. Co. Health Dist. 7. Depertment of Game (Environmental Health) (Reg. Off) 3, DSHS B. Department of Natural Resources (Reg. Off) q Fire District # 9. State Parks & Recreaction Commission 5, Water District # 10. NUO (Reg. Off ) 1,4 , . . ` . 1]. FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456- 2205 Attention: wallis D. Hubbar-c1 REFERENCE: Lead Agency Dresiqnation, Threshold DeterminaEiori, Staff Review, Frvirnnmentai (-hPr014t . man; all or some of attachek Pursuant to WAC 19, division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACT I Nt~ AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: P-1 _L? . ~ his determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. nformation on file concerning this proposed action indica[es your agency to be ,n AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040) (4) or an AGENCY WITH XPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on September 12, 1979 . Piease respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled For September 27, 1979 . The subject proposal or action ,(i5, !S NaT ) LOCAT ED WI THIN TFiE DESIG- NATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE- SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER ENVIRON- MENTALLY SENSITiVE AREA AS DESiGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement ( EIS ) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluatiori ( GW! E) should be prepared. Enclosures Rev. 4'1"1;`79 , ' • ~ . . v ~ • r~~'~~r~~~ ~i I~ Z~ ~ .Y~+1 ,rr~•~ ~ ~ J ENVIROMME.'JTAI CNECKtIST _ - ~1f,pjdE ~Ft~~ SPN,,RG p U AN Intr4~~c:~.non: 7he Scate Environmenul Policy acL of 1971. Chaoter 33.21C. RC51. reautres all s:.;:e and tocal governrtme++tal agent s consider anvirorxnen;al ~+aiues Doth fflr Lfleir own act:cns ana «hen 1lcensing orivate prooasals. 'he Ac: alsa revuires Ghat an Environmental ;maact Statetnent be DreRar!d far ail nrIIjor acttams Sign1".tant!y (anC ":Cverseiy". as 7er wAC 197-+0) af`ectirq tme qualtty of t1e anyslcal environment. "he ;iuraose of tnis cneck2fs: Is to hi!p :he iqencios in- va i vea detem+i ne wnether or nct a 2rooosa 1 1 s such a masar ac;t an, ?lease answer che `ollowing wuest'ons as cauoteteir as you can wits+ ttte infor*rsat!on oresantly avallabie :o you. ale3sa 3nswer :;+HStions 3s "yes" or "nayoe" i'. in your ooinion, aven onTy stignt impacu .rri1 resuit. The r'sv1ew8fS af cne ,t+ecKi+s: -o+411 oe aware of 3nd concerr :ne+nSllves •+iLh tne Ce^rt! 0f lnpac:, aSKtnq you for rr.are ir,fDrmetl0n. ff '1!ClSSdf;I. ~ihere ax0lanatiCns of ;ieur ensrrers are rtquired. or ~nere lou be feve an ezolanacion -mrould be helofut ta g0v!►'nrt~t detiSian-.nakers, `-iciuea your exolanat4on in tAe sCaca provided. or use 3a4 an i:ages, if ,ecessarv. You snauld ~nclude reterences .0 3ny -eflortz or stud ies af wni cn you ara aware 3na ~+f►iC:f 3r2 i av~nc _o :he answers you arov iae. c.:ma 1 e*.e answers to V*ese vues ti on snaw mi 1 i hei p j 11 agenci ts 1 nvo i vM wt tn yeur praposa i:o undsr:ak• :h! requi rtd !nvi rOnmenta i rev i:,+ •.i tnout unnecassary ,:el ay. 'he `olie+vinq dutstians io01/ :z /our tawl prQOOSaI. net just :o the ifc-ense far 4nScn iiu ars currencly aoalyinq or ttie Oro- oosdl for wnfCN 3DCrOva1 is sougnt. Yaur answtrs 5haulo inCiuOe Lhe 'mDactS oiMCh :+iil ~e cauSeC 3y your -.roo.-sai rnen tL ',S cesraleteti. eves+ trougn :amaietion may nat occur untfl someti-re in che `uture. +"his 4iil 311aw all of :he igencles *nio wiil he 'nvoived to caaaol*ce tneir ertvironantal revle+r now. wit.ltout dtailcatinq paoertirorti in the fULllr@. '10 3opltcat`.on ;na11 oe arotesseC uncil :hs cneck]isc tias oeen conoie%e(i and returned :o tRe aaoropria*_e Caunty separt+ent. s~;xe iiw r-eauir•s e<fltinat'ols fpr 4Y,er~► '',ies" ina °-~ayoe" ans.+er )n e _r.et~t!s-. n+e cerson _OmDlet2ng cne lor+n -nay a• 'tCUit'4C LO ,:►'Ov11e exp+anations far 'f18'` af1S1flrS, dRd 1R SOtflQ C38aS. ~rQ 1rii 1nfOrmaLfOfl CO afd !ft d:11rtSR0ld det8nrttnattan. NQTE: 71,is is a standaro forn+ teing usta Dy all state and 1ocai agencles in the Stau ot Washington far various tyoes cf pro0osals. Many of :he -luastions may not aaoty :o /our proposal. :f 3juest~on lats not aooly, ;ust ansti+af it "no" and continue an :o Che rtext -ueS:ian. ENYIRQHKNTAI. CNEtY,L:S' FdRM j . 6ACKGROUtlO ee- 1. tlaa~e of Proqonent: P-IOAJF P!+one Yumoer v /1~ I ~ ~ , ~ tz' . 2. Adartss of Proponent: 3. 3atr UKxI 1s L SutKnt ttoo: s. Aqency ReQUiring Checlciist: i. Namt of P*cposai, if Appiicnoie: S. yawrv and 3rieT Descriotion of :ne "nosa inc,ueinc .uc r,oc iimited to its siu. gentrii autgn a;amencs. ana other °actors tnnt tiill give an accurnce unaersr,an(ling 3f :u sc^ae ana nature): O'f= U E!t f ~ cm ~L ' 1-0 e~ / e ~t~f' ~JrFS~~ vd,e ~ ~e~ f~F~7:1-7t27 ~ ~ 7. .ocatlon at oropesai :descrt0e .ne onrstcal ss:t!ng 3f _ne 'rooosal. is 4e11 :s :ne extent Qf the lana arsa af`ec:el by any environrner+tal !rt+oaczs, 'nc:vaing any ather infor+nation neecM ;a give an accLarate -incerszanoing at the environ- nsenca 1 set:'. rrq of the al ooosa i?: t-oce-t-~-~1 7S~ /utss.orr % E___.~ T 3. "cstlmate4 3ate for Canaiecian of :.Ze 2roaosal : ~ y`orn+ LLOen-cae4 ri 9. Ltst oi a11 Per+nits. Licanses or ~~ove~+ t AAorpv&ls Revuired 'er u+e 3*o7 5a1 (J eral. 3 e ana '~:cal - int:uCiRq ~Zon~ Pr~, ~ ~'i~:?~ *4~~ a p~'N4.~ ~ 51 ( IF SPaCc- =OR EXDLMA7:01,1 ►5 :!+aOEQ;ATc, 21.EASE ar.,ZCx ,001+ :Ov.u. PaGES. ) i0a. Da you, or :he a.ner tn cne event you ao not ow+ :he z~,oject tend. have any alarts far !ucure 3aai!ions, excansion, ir fur:hlr ac;tvlcy related *A or connec:e0 rith tnis proposat' if yes. !xpiifn: 11~0 . 10b. Oo you mw+ or nave oottans on tanC iearty or adjacen: ;o this ;rooosal's location? Yes, explatn: "/ip_ 11. Jo ,.ou kno++ of arty :lans ~y o"ers incluainv che orner which may afte_t :he pMOerty covercd oy your iroROSti ar 'ar,C 3nj3Cent ar nearo;? res, exoialn: 'Z. *c;acn any at!ur naolicnt;an `arm tna_ 7as .een :omole:M ~!^.aratna :he -rcpC531, jf eone Pis :esn conotPted. =ut is expec_84 to De filea st sonse luture ute. Ztscr45e tie mTturs ot sucn anoilc c*on 'on++: ~j('~ i tj, ~ 1 ►~t~ ~ vt t''~ E G~ o n '0O rrsq . ~ ; :.`tY►.ROIIMEYT:+L iyPdCS cAo 1 ana c: ons o' sT i"yes' ana "nayoe' inswers ere reaui rsa ` iss :ar*.n. u111 :he iroQasal r!suit in: a 1 ~.insca0 la sir «h :zndt *.iarts ar ~ n :har.gss `n ;eol ogit s _rvc::.•res? . . . . . . . . . ~ 31sruotioRS, j43G1acenents. :rrroat:•on Zr overtovtr'ng or _re snl!? . . . . . . . _ «)ange -s -=ogrsc~y Dr ;rourta sur'jte re i i ef 'eitures' . . . . . . . . . . . - -ne 315:r.rCt`Gn. caver•ng Or =G'fiC3L',Ct7 of iny Jn`GU! yl413giC ~ ar pnysizil `ea:ureS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ g; ~~V '^C~HS! "t w'rQ -7r rdL?r ar75'~f1 31~ ia11S. °i'."!r ~f! of :fr 5'Le~ . . . . . 1 ! iF 5?At"E 'UR EXPLt1!IAi•'ON 'S :NAliE,:'J6A*i Pl£.45E ~ ~T'AC;i 100I'i4;1A1 P;Gc'S.l . . . ~ ,f' Changes in leoosition or arosiu if 7e3ch 53rtas. or :^ar.aes 'n ;fltat!on. , CeQOSition or erOSion wnicm my roCify the :hannei 3f a river sr SLrqartf ~ x or tht ord of :he aCaan or anv ay, inlet ar idke? I . . . . . . . . . :o13nation: ~ te" a'1 jG . r--r 2, air. Wtil the proaosal result in: res ynvbe vo (a) Air e+aisslons or deterioration of 3mbtent atr qualiCj? . . . . . . . .45. ~ (b) The creitivn of objectionaole oaors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (c) Alteration of a1r TovertKnt. mois.ure or :v.cerature. 7r any ,:.4angs in ' climate. et er lotally or regionaily? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . =_xalanation: rOdkCf ~Or11 QE ~ wr kopries aater. .at 11 ne aronosa i resu i: i n: Yes '~ayoe '+o ;a) Change in cur-encs, or :r,e czurst or direction of wa*_er movements. - ~ in littier marine or !r.sn wacers? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Changes in absoroticn -ates. arainaqo patters, or t2te rata and ~ - amount of surface katrr runotf? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,.c; alteratians 'o :ne courss or ftew af flood waten? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ,_1) :hangt in the amount of surfaca Nater 1rt any water pody? . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~e) :ischarge tnto surface water, or In any iiter3tlon of surface water aualfty, includtng but not itmtted ;o tempereture. dissolvee ~ uxygM or turbi di Ly? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ,;rl Alteratton ot the directicn or rate ot flor af ground waters? . . . . . . . . . ;g) Change in the auanti:y of gounG waters, t1g'+er i11MlJgR ifrcct 3Ctl7t10nS 0r w1ihCTirM15. oI' Cl1Y'OU9h lnLQr'CaOCfOfl Jf af1 ~ aoulfer by cuts or e,ccavaciorts? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ , h} Oe*_ari 9ration i nground water qua 1 i ty . ef tAer tmrougtt a1 rett injec:lon. or :hrougr the ;eeflage af leacnate, anospates, iaterqent5. +raceroon+e virus or yacteria. or othar suo3tanCes ~ ' nta the gound waten? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ;9) Reductlan tn the amounz of water ott+erwlse 3vaiTaoie `or X Dub11C watlr 510CI SQS? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , _ Explanttton: ` 41 wc- l r S~Iq ~ / ~ 3. Ftora. Wtli the prooosal resutt in: Yes 146Yoe vo faj Change in the diversity of ;peties. or nufter of any soeCles of f ora (irtcIudin(j trees, snruns. qrass. crops, mlcraf',ara and aauattc ;lant5)'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) iteduction o! •.ne nuaDers at any untque. rare or snaanqer+sd specits of ilora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 'c? :nttoduc:ion of new spQCtes of flara 'nto an area, or ~ in a barrier :o t:se rtonml reoienisnment ct extstfnq sDectes' . . - . . . . . . _ Re~duttlon i;=; r`eagt of trty a 1t~1!~r312 . . . . . . . . . . - • :xplanatfon: l~Cr.! 040 Tie-s p Dauc 5. =iuna. i111 the arooosai -esuit in: lss Maroe va ;a) C~anges '.n the Oiversity or saec'.es. ar nuaoer of iny sseczes or rauna ;bfras. 'and aninsais 'nctudinq *eocites. `+sm ana snei'.fiSh. bentttic •~rganlsms, tnsects 3r mic-ofaunai' . . . . . . ,bl 7-ia0uc:ion of the nur,osrs ot any untaue. rdre. or "dangered - ~ soactss of feuna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;c} Introduc:ton of new soecies 3t fauns inta an arta. or resuit - ~ in a Darrfer to the migratlon or ;novenent of Reur+a? . . . . . . . . . . . . :d) Jeterforatton of txistzng fi5n ig vildtifs nabi• t" . . . . . . . . . . . :xoianaLton: O C d 5. Noise. r.s "voe vo ,;al oiill the prooosal iicreas• sxis;'.r,g Roise levtis: . . . . . . . . . . =xoiar,atfon: 101pnQte , , '.!ant ana ;iare. res 'Aa+oe 'lo ~e ) 4111 Lhe aroposn 1 arf~dcs iew i i cn .,r gi 3re? . . . . . . . . . . . . zxolanatian: hQ,*% e ~ 7•~ 2 . ' , . „ „ • - , ~r "7R -'(0! ,NA-: 3N :5 ~c . iaGEC„~+;~. ~lcr A r"A C . ••l ' . , 3. Land l7sg. . Yes Mavoe vo (a) atll *_ne prooasal result in the itteratton at the presertt ar ~ aiannea lana se of 3n are~? <<oianat!^n: /i -~;r0'1M~ . -S v ~ ~ ~ 9. Naturel Resources. 'ai ? 1 _ne proposa l resul t 1n: re5 "ay0e (a) (ncrea=e in the rate of use of any natursi resources7 . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Oatpie!ion of any nonronewabla Ratural reseurce? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ecolanatian: , ~es "ayoe 'r~ '0. q'sk of ':ose*_. Oces :ie Droocsal invoive a r!SK of an axQTosian or the retease it nazardous suostances (tncI6dtnq. 5ut net Itmite4 to, oi1, pesticiaes. chenticais, or r3413tf3n) in :!ss event of an atcidtnt or t.OSQt COftC1 :j ort5? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ f..l :=xalandtion: 11. Fooulatton. 'es 4evoe "io aill tre proposal alter the loCation, efstridutlon, denslty, or qrcwth v rau ot the human populacicn of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ , LxplaRa[ion: . r~~ ~ Qlew- cv;~/ -.L>& X-/t C4; ~ , 12. Housirtq. atll the orooasai affect exlstinq housing. ;,r create a den+ana Jar additional houstnq? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ t'xplanatfan: AS US l / f c -3 --fv r T'r ~ ~i ( ~ r--~ pj-opose( r ' 3, i r3nSDOr'attOn/C`rGLI dC10n. 'ai 1 l the orvoosai ~esul t i n: Mavee '+c p ia) Ger+er3ttan of aCdttional venicular moveeKnt? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (0) c`fKts on txist'nq parking facilittes, or donand !ar naw Parkin4? . . . . . . . . (C) ImacL uDan ectsting tYansOOrtaLton 3ystelRSI . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Aitsrations ta aresent patterns of circulation or mov~t of Pcovte ind/ar goeas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Alttrstions :o wateroorne. rati or 3irtraffiC? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (t) ;ncrtasa 'n trai!ic hazaras ta votar venictas, tticyCiists or ps4estr!ans2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )L E~otanation: , ~ 7ro11 V/ U~~ rcv(~,r- fi's -~"i~1t Iu r~l. o s- ro15~as -I/ C 14. P-lat tc Servtcas. Wi11 the Prooasai have an eftx: 4oon, ir resut : fes w3vee '+o :n 3 nea4 `er new or altered governaienul services in any of ot the follawtng aress: ;a) rtre P*otsctton? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ;bl oolite Orouctien? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Scnoois? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (a) Park3 or ottter r+!creational taciitties? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Maincenance o! oubtic faciiities, includtng roads? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ - (f) %her goverrsmenwl serwicas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explenatlon: - 6~ vrc fi'ltE- ro2~ iK ~a -~c ro~os a~ ~ ~ ~ '!F SPACE F+?R J(PI.ANATiON IS :NADEOUAi E. 21:.45E aT'aG4 S00i i:OHA1 ;AGZ3. ; 15. ~-nerav. 41i1 the prooosal result in: f_s "avee 'ic :ai Use of suos:antta i 3n+ounts at fuel or energy? . . • • • • • • • • . • x. ~b1 Oenstnd jpon existtnq sourtes of -e-nerg1, or reCUtr! ~ v~ rG , _ Cr the aeve i o ment of new sourcesqf' ;ner~►? •6 r. • . ~.c~ 1 ana on : rwI 1 iil i:l1e -,rc"sal rtsu1C in i n=ed fOr new SySC~►s. 'fes M3vL%e '+e or 3iterat.ons :z ."e 'ol'owina ut`1',:fes. ' ii Porer 3r -iatsrral ;as.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~i 7AjMsun1c.3t:o0 system' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aidt@r? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sewer :r SeDtfC :af1K5? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - ! ; SCCt"n r3Cl1' sratnaqe? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 3 , ' :~ACc r"vR rt~:T:~'i :;~AEE1t;AT_, aL=~u~ %+~'~C!- ~CD:1'uNAL J»:~.::. , . . . ~ ' ~ So1 tC ~aste artd atsoosal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :_~1~naLlor.: • ~ ~ ~ -r 8..+ ~.,~•1~ , --r' ~--1~' r _ h ~ ~-~c ~ r' ~ro ~ ~ ~ ~ '?5 ''d'~C2 '10 i'. :+uazn Us3 i tz. af 1; ;.ht ~r,;DGSaI r~ssul t+n :n~ :rtation af any ~ea i:zs n~~3ras ~ I ar act~nt~ a ~ ~rea ~ Lh ~azara i exc 1 uai nq ~nen ca i ne~s i*.n l' . _ . . . Y1 _~~~*n~3t'7n: _.'S."?t'~o. .1 ..^,Q ;,ra0o51i r?s~i _ ~n :n~! :o5~rui:;Cn dn~ Si2n~C .75.3 : -~~w open tia ~he p~blic. o~ wil~ che arQao:al res;~it frt ~ae creattcn ot an ;estret!caily oitensive sfte 3pen ~ puol{c vieyr2 . . . . . . . . . o~~na*,•_r. i. ??~~'!ji'?~. ~1' i "ta .1'^~GS.iI ^~SU~ _ . 3~ "'wC3C: _Ji,n ::7? :'.t3, ~'j . :::dnL7Ly dx~5.;rq ^QC-eaL.Gna~ _C~:or~,;nt'•?5' . . . . . . . t . . . . , . •r _.t~ 13R$f'~1~: ~r^_.^PQiJr'~}.i'=ifg`~r+-~i. ~1' .,^,p ?r^70<3 j_ ],',?rl".~:P ~a +1, - ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~n ' - ~f 3 ;5 3~OE ~r'.~ ;~y~iriC,3nt arcnefli~g~t~1 ;,r ~:SLOr~:~l s~Ce. str~cture. ~o3ett o~ ~uildtnq? . . . . . . _ ~ Ct~:9RdC•^ft~ : : . ~ : ~ir1i,.=~ I _ ..R . :.t^5 . :1. .'~+E^~(' . ..~r •-i~ ;.+~a , i . ~?f' :f': . ? . :C "'~s.'.li' :?S ~i . . ':.5: Of 1V ~i.^,7Wj2~'•1~8. +1 :f50 '1f1C!"'S~17d :,'idL YiIiQL~d L.`i ;7Z 3l'i' ai i~v ' ~ ~ • -'•"C _ ~'`i' ~ Sr~~ . . ~ 1 '~tt~ 'rtt5rlpr_52rtCdC.vn ~r rtt i i,Ul 13CK OT =.,i1 diSCiaSur~ on ~rry jar*.Spokant ~~unLy 'n~3y wtU4ra+a any Cet}a~~C'on Of npns~qn~ficance :hat ~t ,nigAt iss~e in -e:~ance ~~on thts c~~ckltst. _ ~ ~ ~3iP: ?~'^:a!t@~: t. / p~g'~Se .•.•^t :r ; CP ~ ?~:GCne~~ ~ ~ L`'` r r1ddT6SS: ~'ri9~e~ ~~~"~~1 CYLL~~ ~ ~~~~e_ 9/~.S'~ - ' ~er~~n _.mola~lrtg -.r) , T`C'.Y_.~`?~ =hpne: ~~~~o~ 7ata: ` ` i _.c._. le~ar~enc or ~~f;~`Ce ~f :.c,n[y ?evte~ni~g ::~eck? i5t: ~..L~L~.~'~~ ,~Il~/11N aw! 4 . : . 3 r f vir~t e ~ • - , ? ~ v • ~ . - ~ , A~ x • ~ ~ - : ~~.~..~1 J ~ 1 \ Dde_~~C~a~ 19 40 i r Received From ~ t~ ~ i Address_ _ ~ 1 ?-7 EioIIarS $ F o r~ 1 q~ 6 i7 2,0 o ^7 - - ~ - ~ ' ACCOUNT ~ i10W PAID ~ AMT. Of ; ACCOUNT CASH ~ AMT. PA9p CHECK ; tlAIAAfCE MONtY 1 ' B ~ DUE I ~~.ORDER ~ r ~ 81(806 Redifprm , . a . ~ ' i ~ . REC+~IPYn Date_ ~ ' 19~~ ~g~d Received From 6~ cTo Cc _ ~ Address I Z7Z") ?u b ; L0.J C, L) Za 7 % ACCOt1NT HOW PAIU I17 AM1 OF CASH ACCGUM ~ AMi PAtD ~ CHECK BALAP7CE MONEY ~ DUE ~ ORDER By ~ r ~ 8K806 Redifprm ~ • ~ ECEIVED J U L 2 -6 1979 SPOKANE CUUNTY PLpNNiNG DEPARTMFNj n` ~ i ' ' - - - ~ • ' - ! - ~i I ~ ' -1~ ( 1~ , ' ~ , , r•. ~ i ~ ~ ~ . ~ -FIRE MARSNALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson 456-5786 ti ° ~ ~ SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 . , • , ~ r . $POKANE COUNTY COllRT HOUSE September 13, 1979 T0: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: SUBDIVISIONS AND PLATS SCHEDULED FOR HEARING SEPTEMBER 27 AND 285 1979 PE=1325-79, PE-1326-79, PE-1328-79, PN-1329-79, PE-1330-79, PS-1331-795 PS-1332-79, PE-1333-79, PE-1334-79, PE-1335-79, PE-1336-79, PE-1337-79_:_ require the following: Adequate water and disbursement of such water is required prior to any construction. . ; LD/kmj ismk ECE~ ~ E s~~ 14 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNlNG pEPqRT MENT . 3gr - ? ~ r-r-.467 E C Ell E EXHIBIT A / . A - PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FOF'M - UL ~ ~ 1979 ALL SICNAr T[ 1~ BLOCA.S (CN PAGES Z AND 3) MITST BE FILLID IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFOR.E RETURNLNG ~ TO 'I'IiE PLAT 5~~~~~M&'~E~T PI.AN%ING ~'PaArRt~I - To be completed bY aPPlicant and swcve3'or AREA AND DISTANCE'`***`#**'"`*«,•~*~~*:~:*.~*:.~~:***~***:***~******#**~***#~*~~:**~::*:*~**.::*:~# Total amount of laad in this Subdivision: 2• S'~ Acres Total Number of Lots y Proposed density of the P'lat: / S 7 Lots/Gross Acre Total a:nount of adjoiIIlrig laad controlled by this owner or sponsor: 0 Acres Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: '~Al„o4 . 4 What is the driving distance in miles to the aearest fire station? itz W<<e Shopping faci ities? '1Z u~ ,1~ Municipal Boundary: -z ut= S. Paved street or hi~way c.~~ ? ~ LAND IISE'~#*s*~sr~~~*►~ss~~~~s*•******~**sss~s~~~ss~s~*~*s*~****ss**:~t~ss**~*sss*:s*ssssss**~ss~*:* Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Si.ngle Family Dwellings Duplexee ( X). Indicate lots for duplexes: qA f Z~. Mu1ti-family dwelling units ( Ind.icate whr.ch lots: Mooile Homes ( ) o Othe„ ( Describe otrer 1-ises: Describe a.ny nor_-residential use proposed _n the Plat: r What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? `/~.°C.Bvt List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: Z. 5-4 acres. other: Acres Is keeging of animals desized? No ( Yes ( x). Type : baW&S~TG 11'irA~rll'J.rY`1►7***tiRM~#4*+R+kh!**##RR*#Rli~+kRR~1*f~[lRtk~~~*t~t~fc~t*k*f~MRFlks*tyrs~rsrk*R**sylfti#f#tRsRait Do you plan to file th Pl t in ita entirety as proposed, or wi~ .1 i tbe a r~~Lti-p'_ase aeve- ? opment? ~~r To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ~ Mi.nireum. Curb and Gravel ( Curb and Paved Paved only C Describe any combi.nations of above: What is the time period zxpected for c' Qmplete developcnent of the Plat: ItAb+,t-4i S atreet improvemeats completed? (p Gtie->,tkS. Substa.ntial number of lots occupied? ~o rRoMAt5 , etc.) Is dedication of any land for public use co templete /(Parks, schoovs No. C Yes Describe: S Indicate the size of units nroposed ta be constructed: q, cc a Square feet Nuaaber of Bedrooms y-l • - Estimated Sa1e Price Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No C}~). Yes ( Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? No C~.). Yes ( Tg rlyes", explain: T1'?'~,ITIF,Ss*~:~:*~~*tt:~.**s:~*s~***#:,~ss:ss*s:s~~c*:~:c*s:**~~~*s*s*s*~rs+~:ss*~*~~~*~r~+~*****~~* Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( X). Lagoon ( Trgat2+EPt ulant ( )o Other, or .~ombinations (Describe) indicate the proposed saurce o; watzr supply: Individual welis ( ) . Public system Prilvatz community sy8tem ( ) . 7ndicate methed of extending sez-vice to the lots (DwALings) : ~Underszround utility easements overhead utilit f easements ( Utilities in streets ( No easements ( ~ I ind:;.cate the distance from thi3 proposal to the nearest existing water cnain: / S ''eet ~.r.d_cate size of neaz-e;,t --ain: ~ inches. -0VER- ~ C • ~ EXii iBIT A PRELIMf.INARY PLAT APPZICATION FORM (Continued) page ` II'I'ILITIES - CContinued}s*~*s****s*s~*****~*.+r*~~*#****ss***~*~********~*s**s~~s*~*#*~**~~*s*s*• Li9t utility compa.nies or districts expected to provide service, tJ~ this Plat: Electricity: • Gas : Water : ~J0'2 G&J~`~' ~ Phone : ~/1(- G(i. f.'Z. ACIQVO TS*~*:::~~*~#**~:~*~:.*~*....~*.~*...*~****.~~***~M~**~#**~***~**:~**~*►*~***~*:~* PROPOSID PI+AT NAME : r~ dwC~ ~'d~ .jlzc n I, the undersigned, have completed the infor,nation requested, and the Prelimi.nary Plat has been preparZ~L_V me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spoka.ne County ~ tment an.d the laws of the State of W ' gtin. - , ~ r+ -k r ~l Wr_ (Signed) Date: i/ Jv : ~ t_ . . . (Address) ~ Z f /Mc. S /C't>E P'hone : : , : ~ , 4, . ~ 4 - j~~.'~'- t,-: ,ti,y ~ G~C4vtE l~B,S ~N~ Zip : ~ ~ ~ S'j,~ ~ ~ SURVEYOR' gLAE: T, the undersigned, swear under the penalt T of pei• jury tnat t:_e above res'nonses a.ra :nade truthfully a.nd to the best of my knowledge. I f•srther swear that I AM THE OWNER 4F RECORD of the site propoaed aB the preliminary glat, or, if not the owner, attached here- with is written permission from aai.d owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf. I also understand, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack or full :isclosure on my part, Snokane County may withdraw a,ny declaration of non significa.nce that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. 42 (Signed) Date: L?J tIe (Address) C O Phoae: / !Ue • Zip: .22sw 62 c NOTARY - Date : ;7/j NOTARY SEAL: 1c s t ■ Y 1r s f! * ~ * i = ~ ~ * # # * ~ fc R # # # s iR # R * # k s t ~ • s ik ~t s 1 ~c i ~ ~ M t # s ~ ~ ~ i R k sc ~ ~ K r s * # ► : k ~ i y r ~c Vc x si s si : # M* * t .K t « * ~ ~ aR x Part II - to be completed by waLer purveyor A. Thie subdivision (is) (ya-wvt) situa.ted within our service area, B. We are (able) ( ) and willing to supply thie subdivisi.on with adequate water =cr (damestic) (fire) (is'v-' ' ' ) (c ) uses. C. Satisfactory arrangement (keem) (have not) been made to serve this provosal. D. Signature (only when items A, B& C are true and Xeani eteC) ~_lti'~2 ia- g,j c T~,K. / / ? ~ 7~ purveyors name ei title date ~*•***~**~*ss*sss*•*~**#*:~**:***s**~.**~*s*sss:**:~::*~::*:.~....**s«*~*ss~~~.~~**~..~*~.~*~~*. Pzrt TTT-to be c;nm, leted by uezlth Di-stric± A. Health Dis+..rict sta~ f ha.s co=l?ted a;ield;.-nrestJ,-ation o? tt:e s_te . B. Hea::.th District requirements `_'or -jrel;^!i-,ar-,; pla :~obeer satis._ed. " :'vehave ~ C. Si~na T 0_ 712 3Y signatvse and title +as**s~ssssyt~#stR~~RSi~ssIct~cR##*#*!;f*~Yk# ♦t#i~tM*tR►*#s F#R!#~F#~ti*~*4~M i ~sjiFt*~*M ~~*~k;1#iiskrc# C f olfrl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A PREL..• `INFi11~ ~T APPi.1IXf11iiON FO3L4 t (C{)A°fiC131ued) P3ge 3 **?M~~.*x*:*~rx~w*w 0 -+~##xpm * w*rc*Aar*~*»,~~~~a~-x3t ra A*****f** Par~ ~ - to be ca~u~al~ by County Engineers 4fLice A. County Engi-neers Offi-ce requirement~ ~or prelimi;rary plat~ ~av- (have rot) been 5at7.sfied. T,--k..? Cui- de, y S.ac_ =+4~T frolprr7'y ,,C,•.ve a~ P',t cT- 5(4~~` 7F ~ Tt>C~~ ~ ~ ~~`^,~$J°•r✓/~~ ~ rrG'~~ ~ B. Si~t1~I`' 7I 1/ 2 ~ s - ~ur~ ~d itie date Psrt V - to be comp, eted by County Uti1.ities Dept. A. Coa.nty Utiliti-es Department requirements for prelimir..ary pla ~ave (have na~) be~~ satisf zc cT. . B. Signature . ~I sand tit1e c~te ~his nart to be comgleted by Plamni-ng Department Planning Depa?-tment Irt -12or-mation Date Subm.i tted : 74~5'/M( Preliminary F1at Date Accepted : 71~5-h ct C~~ckl~ ~t Fee : Pla.t .f. ile No• • PF i 1337r7q Z►1~~ ~~ange File i■o• A729 ~t ~''].~.'t NC~A1e: ~ ~/A~'~f ~t' t 44,00 ~ r~ Exi~ting Zoning: 4r. Number of Lots: L4 Date Established: Location: Sec L57 T a4~' R 44(4 Advertised Zone Change: ~ Checked by: RK-5 School District: lStpi 64 Hearing Date; x4 , ~ : , - ~ C ~ ~ , y - ~ , PF _ 6 . - . . rEGAi, DEscRrPrzoN Being a legal description of a portion of Tract 100 of Vera Plat, as recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, at page 30, situated i.n the Con.nty of Spokane, State of Washi.ngtan, and more particularly described as follows: The Soxi-thwest Quarter of said Tract 100 except: (1) The North 10 feet (2) The South 89 f ee t and the West 10 feet of the Southeast Quarter except: (1) The North 10 f ee t (2) The Sonth 89 feet , s ~ ~~,`'a~~ s~j~• ' ~ ~ ~ • . • • O ~ • P ~ : 71 • ~9~~ ~,o Fss •!~ccrsi~~~°•• ~A~~ C~~ ~M~N~ 'Qaz~.•~` 5QO1~G ~EQ p,R Q~NN ~ / SPOhAiVE COUIVTY HEALTH DISTRICT I nter-Uf fi ce Communi cati on Dd,t : Augus t 8, 9 T• S okane Count P1 nin ~ ~ G. P y g Connnission Fi~Of~fi: Scott,Fink, R. S. ,`'and Eugene C. PAattiew, R. S. 40, ~1 SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary Plat - Mamer's Addition p~ sPO~ 0J / 4401 ~4F c0 1. Ref erences : '~~j ~ . Fiyl a. Map of subject, scale 1"=50', by Billy J. Tucker, Jr., dated July 13, 1979, received by this office July 25, 1979. / b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Re-- sources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface [Jaters on Groundwater Quality in the Spokane Valley, D.K.Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metro- politan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, [,Tashington, Soil Conservation Service, U. S. D. A. ,March, 1968. e. Spokane County, Washington, Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. 208 Study chemical sample results. g. Field Survey Report, Scott Fink, Spokane Couraty Health District, July 24, 1979. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S. 2. Topography, Soils, and Watex: a. This project lies in a relatidely f lat area between Opportunity and " Vera. Local drainageways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam c-yith 0 to 5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter f ield limitation of slight with possible - contamination of groundwatex. c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The locaer terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. &CHD-AGM--11 8 • ' IkW1M' S ADDIT IOAT August 8, 1979 Page 2 d. The ciata from three 208 study wells in the area shocas the highest total nitrogen level was 1.7 ppm. The Vera jJater District has indicated that it can supply domestic use caater for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact Discussion: a. The plat sponsor has proposed 4 lots on 2.54 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage dis- posal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for secJage disPosal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and setaage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitation years, subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundcaater. However, bacteria and detergents• (phosphate por- tion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phos- phates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."--- " The analytical results of the forecasC impact of year 2020 when com- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundcvater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of .96 to 1.7 ppm. A projected incre- mental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges 1.04 ppm to 1.8 ppm. Current federal and state drinking cJater standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: ~ MAA'IER' S ADDITION August 8, 1979 Page 3 (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit fox the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. - (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons, have sa£ety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. 4. ltecommend that: ~ a. A public water system including fire flows serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. ~b. Each lot be authorized the use of an individual on-site secaage system. c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this IN° office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of eight (8) dwelling units are authorized t-jithin the plat. X d. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. e. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the Y preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, County Fngineer and Spokane County Health District. CJritten approval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat. f. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drainage f acilities shall be submitted to the County Engineer and Spokane County Health District for approval prior to construction and the filing of the final plat. ~ g. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized the use of an individual on-site seviage disposal system. h. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private E-iells and water systems is prohibited." ~ i. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use, and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the f ire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior to the f iling of the final Plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in confornnance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification cai11 be drafted on a transparency suitable for repXoduction. • t MAMER'S ADDITION August 8, 1979 Page 4 j. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat ~ on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements "x have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities ~ prior to application for building permits within the plat. The con- tractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system. k. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system as approved by County and State health authorities x and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic caater service as well as f ire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot," sl c: Billy Tucker, Jr., E. 12721 Sprague, Spokane, WA 99216 Plat Submission Authorizatiwa low, : ~ ~ E C E I V E D_J U L 2'7 1979 TO WHONi IT MAY CON CERN : SFOKANE COUNTY This letter is to serve as authorization for PLANNING DEPARTMEPJT 4AAYY -;tee~e-e„ to submit to the Spokane County Planning Department for the purpose of subdivid3ng the following legal],y d,escribed parcel of land: V-44.vt et,I' A ~ ~ X10 -9ll ~ /V /O. .e`~ ~ ;6L t s , v s ~9 This parcel of land canaists of approximatel,y acres and is located 42 ~ . W ~ 1.~., ^ ~ per Date Titleholder Date ~ . '04 ~ MpMje iP S ~~~~T/o~✓ Set•rorago l1l.ternatilns (o lots ,Z/ s o galIon per day ~ a G oo L.F. dxain Irield ee AJ.ternatives for sQwage disposal t-rill be analysed: ~ ~ (1) On-site septic tank (2) Comrmmity septic tank (3) Comr=it;y package treatment Alant (1) On-site septa.c tank Capital costs oQ $ O O Annual costs Punpi.ng 0 ycar intervals $ /;z o e` Drain f ielcl xepl rccrr;ent C.) 10"' jarr °O Total 0& T•I annual cou ts $ ~p ~ ( 2) Cornmunity scptic tank Caaital costs . (Est. ) gallon mul.ti-chamber tan.lc ins talled $ ,2 Oo D e o Lif t station ti~~tll appurtenances /!a m o•• Drain field 3, L.F. es v o•° J8" sewerarre line L.f. @ / a 40 manholes 3 / 8, s o clean out U - - - Loss af lot $ •o Annual 0& M c o s t s Pumpin,r (~st. ) $ / 2 o mo Drain field raplacemont / ~'o •a Pariodic linQ cZQaning E1QCtrical ~ pump :nuj.ntenanco ,,,,1p n •O Total Q ~C Ii aruzual costs ~ ~oo eo . ~ ~ ~ ,o•oooo.o e ~ ~9 q o t a 0 Y)~'$? 0 rM ~ • Y q°ao,~F, o 5~~~~.°•~~~ AV ;os 0 ~ Q1J` tgb~ns,~0 ~d'A ~ ~<"~:`7aaCS~a`~w ti ~ Page 2 ' (3) Communlity packa;e treatment plant 2gital costs Lif L station, aeration chamber, clasif ier and c-hlora.nation chamber a o ?aa.th neccessary app~urtenancos Drain fie- I d . 811 set•Perage 1J11e Oe 111cirih0lQ 5 • D ClE~'c.tT10Ut Q~ DO e o Loss of lot (s) $ A11t1U.a1. O u°t "e1 CO S t S Pumpin~ claxifier $ /90 oa Drain field replacement Period.ic line cleaninp, ~ m o Electrical, pump ;nd tank rnaintenance 2 9~0 Total annual 0& 'V'l costs $ 7 io Tne follo7-ra.ng table sumarizes the costs assoca.ated i•rith the thx-ee alternative sez•raZe waste disposal systems considered: Annual Cost/Unit Capital Cost/Unit On-site septic tan.k $ 8p 0 V $ ~'oo Comrnin.ity septic; tank 22 Coiru-runity pacltagc troatment oy pJLa.nt On sito Septic Tanks are the most feasibZQ alte rnative. o ~ o, •~t YdASNj~;c,. . ~ . : F~ ; . • ; . c ' r~- ,''•;p`£:;'rj~': ~ •r ~ v ••.o:'..••`~~yv i ~~tw ~~Oi`tAV r aa~ ♦ ♦ 't<:- , _ Al Y PRELIMTNARY PLAT COMF'~~CINCE CHEC~LIST (Return this sheet wi -Lh the Applicattvn) Date of Conference: to /j ;Z1~ ~i Sec: Twnshp._ . 2,5- Range , ~&Kt,~~ E Total Acr°es. No. Qf Lots_ Proposed P1 at Name AW1iX1C_j?,_ 2 ~a 1979 A r% ~,►P Li(CA wlrr'IIAIM E A_ t -7 ADaRESS : 2, 7 ~2,.1 PHONE: . Zip : TWE FOLLOWi1V~ DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUBMtTTED PRIOR TC ACCEPsAGdCE BY THE PLANNING DEPART- M€NT FOR HEA~ING BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION, ~XPLAINED IN DETAIL uN i HE INFORMAi ~ON REQUI REMENTS HAhlD-OUT SHEET : . L-,-FttL PRELIMINARY PLAT FEE ($195.00 + $5.00/lvt: Ma~imum $750.00), -I~ , 4<P-LAT A~PPLICATION (EXHIBIT A) (AZT signatur-e blocks eompfiet~)%/ L.,2.LGAL DLr-SCRIPTION (EXHIBIT B) (Signed surveyor's stamp) ZA<`NGINEERS SECT~ON MAPS (EXHIBIT C) (With parce7 ~'s) .`f. L,~A5SESSORS SECTIQN MAP 2-{ EXHIBIT D} (Show atner owrned or optioned 1and)p. 4-.`_~PRELIMIMARY PLAT MAPS ~ 7(EXHIBIT E) (Even scal e requi red) A. ~ ~~CKLINE COPrES (r~o_NOT FbLO BLacKLIN€ PRI~~-~s~) ~ B. ,,4/ BLUELINE COPIFs DEVELO€'MENT PLANS {EXHIBIT F} 4-7-- SEWAGE STU'DY REPORT (Provide 3 alternatives) A.2 WAi ER SUPPLY REPOF, T (Requi ~~d for wei 1 s -or new rvater~ servi ce) B. SZORM WATER DRA►INA~E PLANS (If required by Enartneers) C. LANDSCAPING PLAN5 (Requ ired when 1and use canf1 i cts mich t occu r) D. ROAD PLANS ANp PROFILES (If requi red by Engi neers ) . NVIRONMENTAL GHEGKLI5T (EXN I BIT G) ($6C. 00 Fee Required) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - STAFF REVI tW OF PROPOSAI.. - e - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - A. UNIQllE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES: O)~~+ E ~ ~ , ~ B. CuLTVRAL REsaURCES: C. COr~~ENTS; P1 at Admini strator f SPOKANE COUNTY - - - PLANNWG DEPARTMENT N. 721 JEFFERSON ~ " - E'~• SPOKANE, WASHIIVGTON 99260 s- p~ r~ y V V'~y,~'.('~ G {o ~ . ~ ~ d ~ 4k,o ` R. h9ottaz \ E 333 6th Spokane, . 99203 ~ c-J 4 0 W N 11 ' ~r 1979 o R f~ T0 SENDER ~ ti f - _ I . - - - a. a,. I rv~~"~~" .r~~.~:~~ , k. ~ a ;;sue d . I ~ I I "`4' ~4;: „M, ~ i iii .H. s r~ ~ . ~ , W ~ a .war X~ P o..e..: ..w.-.w.e.....~, n. . ...m:. i ~ i ~ µ...rrv..~.... w.. r m, ~ I e a ~ ~ ,.....:.M a....:- ss.., v. w.: ~ & r 'a. L.....e:.u.m ...ma A~. 'R. rv, „y. r I 4 . . . . . i