The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1059-76 - A TOPIC OF DISCUSSION A., _HIS HEARING MAY BE WHETHER OR . _ ~ THIS PROPOSAI, IrIII t, HAVE .4 SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT. AGENDA, DECIIMBER 10, 1976 TELEPHONE N0. : 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PL.ANNING COMMISSION rrime: Friday, December 10, 1976, 9:30 A.M. Place: Conference Room A, County Cvurt House Annex PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING 3. PE-1059-76, Ridgemont Estates No. 2 ZE- 144-76, Agrxcultural to Single Famil,y Residential (R-1 ) a. Location: Section 25, Township 25 P1., Range 44, E.W.M. That portzon of the NE 1/4 of Section 25 lying NEly and Ely of and adjacent to Ridgemont Estates, bounded generally on the east by the 2300 foot elevation contour line; on the west by the 2075 foot elevation contour line, and on the north by the north llne of said NE 1/4. b. Sponsor: Tupper Realty Co., Inc. East 12929 Spr•ague Avenue ~ Spokane, Washington 99216 c. Land Surveyors: Benthin and Clark East 260$ Sprague Avenue Spokane, Washington 99242 d. Site Si2e: 42 acres e. Number of Lots: 62 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings g. Exlsting Zoning: Agricultural, established March 27, 1942 h. Advertised Zone Upgradlng: Single Family Resa.dential (R-1) i. Water Source: Vera Water and Power . j. School District: Central Va11ey School District ' ' ~ ~~.«c ~ ~ " ~ ' ° ~ i >•":_''c ~ 00- rc rost o , MI t]IZ ~ . - ~ _ .vf ILE p....~ LJSILLSetw,~ N i ¢ 4rw Z v ^ Z v ~ _ y ~ r 3_ ~ ~ ^ E .a fLlf M430• • ;JtdJ ' ~ ~ • pAjy~ o .eahvnvp~TF'}"' /LAKb~I G j1 ~TM S ° xK t 1 1 N AVf •i a♦ h ~.sr c►. ~ `Yf f• ss a. co ait M'M M nD'7f 17L R) 174 RD f7i 77 ry 9 1ilQ 193 '84I0 1 4 718 ~ i ~ - F(t G1 I rd 1 ~ S~QQ~. ~ l S s~• yr ~ o/ ~ ' I 1 ~ ~ O ryJ/ ~ ~ I O < L':1J~ ~ , 1~, ( ' C Iy7N rn.ia l N J _ ~ 1! Ih l ~a ~ - ' w t ~ 1M ~ R f wTn L •A I • t ~ I ~ ► i l I r , - ' ' .7 ' 16T P % ) rN S • ~ I = c' LL ' ■ . a ~ I i o ♦ „ p SCAL 19 : = 4 ~~(C,~_ o ~ ~ o ~ ' ' ~ ~ n yz M;L E . Ln 24 Tm 24a' A~/E N UE •..rwur vt o S' ~ ~ ~ ~ f• • ~uw w ~ w ~ C•Y I ~ F ~ . ♦r~M a~ I: I y fG W}~ I w ~i ~ . Ro ` " I $ Y . ~ r V.f .,A -w.Rr. c w -3- . ~ , , NOo 78 504 ' . BEF4RE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, VJASHINGTONo ZE-144-76 ) ) . I1lT THE IiliAY ER OF CHATVG Ii\TG TI-3L- ZONI NG ~ . Ivll)-P F'~~~ !~GRICLTLTURAI, 20 SINCLE Fz-UViILY ~ R E S 0 L U T I 0 N 1.ES1DYJ1VTiF-kL OAV r $IOrLRl1 LVlie11~ED 1dV 1 vX1I014 25, I'UVv TVSHYP. 25, N. , RrlitGE 44, ~ ) E.v~., iVL,, SF 4KANE C OUNZY, ~~i-_SKI NG 1'O1V ) The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice of the hearing on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning Commission has held a public hearing as req_uired; and that the said Planning Commission concurB in the plan to zone the following described property as: SINGLE Fl-WILY RESIDEN'1'I~ ~U1 `l'M"~`1 area platted as 'Tlidgemont Estates No. 2, locatecl in Section 25, Township 25 N. , Range 44, E.Vv1o M. , Spokane, County VVashfngton. N01-1, THEREFORE, BE IT RE,SQLVED, that the abovE-described property be, and the same hereby is zoned under the classification of 17-ingle gamily nesidentgal as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amendedo PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS ~ D DAY OF ` ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, IrlASHINGTON VERNON W. 0 AND , Clerk o e rd y. Boa • HARRY M. B D~puty RAY W. CHRWEII~EiV o ~ jr-nnU . Kcipp This is to certify that this is a true and correct of . Resolution Noo ~a 504 passed by t Boa this 770 day of 9 o ~ By : eputy I hereby certify that I have post ° the above changes and revisions on the Zoning Map in the Building Codes DepartmEnt, and do further certify that the zone classification change is the same as described above and 0 shown on the attached mapo SIGNED: . DATED : i' ~ > ~t '~~`C~u~•,~ ~ ,~?L-~r•:~~ ~~-rr.~~~, . ~ s1' 41~5 ~ F~- 2~7''Ll L~'~ r,'~~~7ur <J f . diu~. , ~y~.~l.t at~ ~ . . ✓ GQ-t~ ~-d ~~r°!~ ~C.~ ~Li~~~ Z.Br't ~r~ ~~j~~ ~ ~ • ! ~f%~t.11 ~ . ~ ~ ~ • _ f ~ z. .t'r.~~ t".~~~%~~~.~- , :-'3n GZ'O ~ ~ cl'•, .-~~..~-u G~--~u:~~-a.- ~ +1V~~~~ 9mmwr ~ •~'1' •V r -'C ~ ► 030 l3k4OAL4 ! 71^ _ . ~ ~r ?-z~ / ~ ' ~~f ~~.7 T • ' ~ , ~ ~ ~i : ~ . - . . , ' • ' ~ //1 ~ % i . / f ~ ~2G~?~' i~lli'1-Gr/'S~~z-rys~' r~-~ %►~Y'r7~ rl.~-.;: T 7 rt~y~ ~y-,7rrj ~r ; ~ • . . , ~4 r ~ OL~ ~ ~MY * REsPo~r~~~#~{~~ DIRECTORS aR GEaRGE M. Ea~ENTRouT 5~pe~4ut~:t~ent KATHY M PI~RSOM1lS._ Px:etae"t ~~rtmnity CHARLES G. ST[]CKER DR aRUCE L GEHMAN v,oe Predaenc ,mutantSnperLntepdent Centra Va ey Schoo District No. 356 JAfV~T B FISCUS, . °p Admi~atr~tive S~rvis~ Uaer=r lake iVEIL a PRESCOTTF JR. OF SPOILANE VALLEY RICHARd H IVESTER . OP4ortuiutg Aeslatant9upw}nteadent 123 S. Bowdish Rnad Telepha+ie 924-6551 .F QARRELL A 7W~MPSON Fdusa►tiona3 Sarviaes SPOIiA*IE, WASlIIlr1GT0~1 09306 EDVUIN J. MIKESELL December 21,, 1976- ]4la►aggr o4 Hu~ina66 SCC~~ Mr« DW~ght .S . llllffie Actiag Dixector Spokane County Planning Commission North 81I Jefferson RE: Ttem PE-1059-76 Spokane, Wash. 99201 ZE-144-76 DeSr MY, H11m2 s In refe~~nce to Pianning Commission Aetian on Ridgemont , Estates #2 what consideration was given to a schaol site in this ; deveTvpment? If ❑ne was inciuaea in the preliminary may Ihave a copy of the plat? ~ , RespectfuIly, , George 1yI. Eisentrout Superintendent • GME : m ~ ~ ~ RECEIV ~d~ ~ ~ t ~G t JA~ 9f{,~.g,~ VUU1411 ~ ~ION ~ ~ - t i MINUTES DECENiBER 10, 1976 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING PE-1059-76 - RIDGEMONT ESTATES IVO. 2; TUPPER REALTY COMPANY. . INC. ZE- 144-76 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) Planning Commi ssion Recommendation: AA prove for the followina reasons and subiect to the followin,zi conditions: (Vote was unanimous.) A. REASONL... 1. This proposed plat is within the Metropolitan Area and has a similar density as Ridgemont Estates, Tim ber Lane , Timber Lane 1 st and Timber Lane 2nd. 2. This proposed plat is a"fill-in" plat between the existing plats of Ridgemont Estates and Rotchford Acre Tracts and is a continuation of said Ridgemont Estates. 3. This propcsed plat will be served by ac?equate dedicated roads, ample water and fire protection and power as well as have a sewer system e 4. This site has marginal agricultural value because of the soil type (USDA III), topography, acreage, or existing timber. 5. This proposed plat is separated from ownerships of different densities by topography or timbEr. B. CONDITIONS; 1. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached sheets as noted. 2. Tl:at a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be "urther subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the preliminary plat of record. 4. That appropriate provision be made that the following descrfbed property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. .(Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) 5. That appropriate street names be indicated. - 3 - ~ PE-1059-76 RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 2 (Continued) 6. That appropriate utility easc:nsents be indicated on copies of the ap- proved prelirr.inary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must bE received prior to the submittal of the final plat. 7. That a plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, priar to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be draftea on a transparency suitable for repro- duction. The purveyor wlll also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for eonstruction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schec3ule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion a~ ~rie water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities _ prior to application for building permits within thE plat. The contractual arrangements w'll include a provision holding Spukane Gounty and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot pur- chaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the 3pproved water system. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water systerrz as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. 8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. 9. That the prEliminary plat be given conditional approval to january 10, 1978. 10. That streets be i.m.proved to standards established by Spokane County or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements be furnished the County Engineer. The bond may also cover the cost of "as built" plans, engineering costs, and placing of final center line monuments. 11. That profiles of streets, cross sections, proposed grades and drainage plan of the plat be submitted and 3pproved by the County Engineer and by zne P lanning Director before the f ina 1 pl.a t i s drawn. Prior to a ccept- ance of the improvements or re lease ot bonds, a ce rtificate by a regis- tered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor will be required indicating that all improvements have been installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans. - ?A - _a! PE-1055-76 - RIDGEMO`tv I' ESTATES NO a 2 (Continued) r 12. Conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of the right of way to the publ.ic and approval of the :oad system in the piat by the County Engineer. 13. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 14. T11-,.1t conditional approval by given subject to provisions in the plat for a pliblic sewer system. Approval of the design of said systems must be yiven by County and State Health authorities and the County Utilities Department prior to filing of the final plat. A suitable guarantee will be required to cover the cost of providing said system in the amount as determined by the Public WorkS Department. An operation and management agreement providing for management in perpetuity must be concluded to the satisfaction to the Health officer prior to the signing of the final plat. (RE: Public sewer system) 1 S. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that a public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. C . THRESHOLD DETERMINATION: Planning Commission Recommendation: That a Final Declaration of Non-Siqni- ficance be issued. D. ZONING RECOMIviENDATION: Planning Commission Recommendation: Approve Ridqemont Estates No. 2 Subdivision as indicated on the preliminarv plat of record to the Sinale Familv Residential (R-1) Zone classificction upon the filinq of thc final plat. REASO 1~"! i: ~ 1 e The 62 lots a.n the Ftidgemont Estate-s No. 2 have been designed to accom- modate single family residential use; i. e., gross density of 1. 5 units per acre. 2. The Planning Commission has been upgrading similar residential plats in the area to the Single Family Residential Zone; i, e., Ridgemont Estates, Timberlane First and Timbcrlane Second. 3. The Single Family Residential Zone prohibits duplexes, animal keeping other than household pets, mobile homes and horr.e occupations. - 3 B - PE-1059-76 - RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 2 (Continued) E. GEIVERAL DATA: 1. Location: Section 25, Township 25 N. , Range 44, E.W. M. That portion of NE 1/4 of Sect . 25 lying NEly and Ely of and adjacent to Ridgemont Estates, bounded gen. on E by the 2 300 ft elEVation contour linE; on W by 2075 ft elevation ccntour ln, and on N by north line of said NE 1/4. 2. Sr,c_,-isor: Tupper Realty Co., Inc. Ea st 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA 99216 3. Land Surveyors: Benthin and Clark East 2608 Sprague Avenue Spokane, WA 99202 4. Site Size: 42 acres 5. Number of Lots: 62 6. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings 7. Existing zoning: Agricultural, established March 27, 1942 8. Advertised Zone Upgrading: Single Family Residential (R-1) 9, Water Source: Vera Water and Power 10. School District: Central Valley School District. - 3 C - ~ ~ , " P .,t}4C j •t' oy\~'lal ~ ~ - 7 , ' , ~ i - _ , , SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ ~ Ij ~ PUBUC WOHKS BUILDING N 811 JEFfERSON STREET PHONE 458-2274 • ~ ~ ~ ' ( 2 . 4 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201 SPOnANE COUNTY GOVRT nOUSE MEMORANDUM . T o : D1S4vic-f-0,Z,VA.l.~ire DISfI nucNmI kw{GQ 9 V44) (6Ua{~~t sys~wt~ F R O M: S pokane County Planning Department N. 811 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99201 Attention: Jo4u NuNNHe~- DATE: R E F E R E N C E: Attached Propo sed Declaration of NonzSignificance and Environmental Che c k 1 i s t fo r Zl DGE/l,(pAJ'r ESTA10S *Z Z ~ ~ 144 -716 t Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be one of jurisdiction, WAC 197-10-040 (4). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your right to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advisel that the proposal was listed in the SEPA Public Information Center on l7 l- . v ~ ~ 1 ~ ry a ] c- _L SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBUC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFFERSON STREET ~ r~ I L~ . _ ~ . PHONE 456-2274 _ _N +rS Y _~„r SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 SNOKANC COUftTt COl Ri HOUSE LE..AD AGENCY DESIGNATION OF SPOKANE COUNTY Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, n divisi.on of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAID AGENCY for the following described project: PMl.1Nt G6=- oW90-10W T 9941115-:s 4 2 Fe -1059 ~ ZE - I 44--~,g The following xs explanation for this determination: --WpC (Q7-10-220 Determination for Spokane County By: Name: 3O~t W~JNMY! T itl e: FL&T ADM.t MI SJ12Ar?OR. Date: 12121-7(, r . ' PE-1059-76 DEPT. FILE REF. ZE- 144-76 STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and ZIITAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the Spokane County Planning Department • The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action Requested: Preliminarv P.l.at and Zone Chanae anprQval (Ridgemont EsLates No. 2) B. Description of Proposal: 62 Sinale Familv lots on 42 acres of slooLao. (5 - 25%) pa.rtXally treed ground; average lots approxima~ely 24, 500 square feet with central sewage collection sys~em and plant. C. Location of Proposal: S1oping hillside approximately 1/2 mile east of Su'livan Road betvveen 16th and 24th Avenues in Spol:ane Valley. II . Review of Checklis t: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: II. 1, (Earth); H. 2.(Ai.r); H. 3. (WaLer); II. 4. (Fiora); II. S. (Fauna); , ' II. 6. (Nol.se); II.7 .(Light and ulare); I.[ .8. (L3nd Use); II.11. (Population); II . 12. (I-iousing); II . 13. (Transportation/Circul3tfon); II. ° 14. (Public Services); II . 16. (Utilities). B. Potentially significar?t adverse impacts a-re noted under the followa.ng que s tions : None C. Discussion of impacts identified in B above: ' large 'Lots on streets well suited to terrain with comrriunfty sNater and sewerage systerri yield a proposal vvith numerous mitigating aneasures alrzady implemented. III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on II B and C above, the staff concludes that there will be no significant adverse environmental fmpacvs v►rill result and recommends that a d~-.c:laratfnn of non-- signi.ffcanee be f s sued, . J SPOKA:iE COL'IviY EINGZNEEI'. ROAD DEPARTHEENN'T SUBDIVISI0N SECTION T0: 7osq TTrcia, D' rectox of pl anni na DATE: December 7. 1976 FROM: :tobert S. Turner, County Engine2r • SUBJECT: Standard Plat Conditions We recommead approval of the plat of RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO» 2 PE-1059-76 subject to the following conditio ns: that conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of Right of Way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by_the County Enoineer; that plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Enoineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat; that drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of drain- age facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat; construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed Iand surveyor, who sha1Z be responsible ' for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be disturbed during construction and who shall furnish the Courzty Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing t'nat all improvemAnts were iastalled to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed moncmnents have been replaced; no construction work is to be perfomed within the Public Right of Way until a pennit , has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspectioa and approval by the County Engineer; all construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing . the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and moncmenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. - ' -1 5PO~ANF, /1000 s ~ , ~ . ~~r~~tl'Y~' ~ ~ ' , ~~i~~J ~?~~':'2'fS✓~L/ A~C~~ /~V` > ~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUs ANE. 7M~ CX:T. (509) 928-1700 R6'~Z '4Z'% November 29, 1976 Mr. Dwight Hume, Acting Director Spokane County Planning Commission Spokane, Washington Dear Mr. Hume: The following zone changes and preliminary subdivisions have been reviewed for adequate fire protection: '■-■in-90-7x- ` ZE- 144-76 - hiains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. PE-1061-76 ZE- 146-76 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. PE-1060-76 ZE- 145-76 - There are existing mains in this area but hydrants will be needed. ~ ZE- 139-86 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. r ~ , ZE- 140-76 - This area is covered by adequate mains and hydrants. ~ I ~ : ~ Sincerely, ; , . ~ A I+ e q Al Cook ~ Lt. of Inspectors i= ~ Fi re Prevention Bureau ' i I ( ~ RECFIVFC ~ ac : cy ~r ~rv-►~vc ~uv~ ~ N"ING CbWAS.fiIM - ~ i~" ] p ~j ` 'a ~~d '~~Y`~ ~1~~~ " ~lJ ~~~~~U . ,e-.._.., . LAND SURVEYORS, P.S. E 2608 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 (509) 534-3475 November 19, 1976 Spokane County Planning Dept. N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Wa. 99201 ATTN: Mr, john Nunnery Re: Ridgemont Estates No.2 De ar Sir: This is to advise that the above referenced subdivision, submitted to your office on November 15, 1976, will be served by the same sewer treafiment plant befng used for Ridgemont Estates. Modifications and enlargemenfis to the plant will be made, as necessary, to serve the additional users. Sincerely, BENTHIN & CLARK Profe s s ional Land Surveyors 3~ r Daniel B. C lark , L. S. DBC/njb 04 ~ ~ . srvrti,~ti~ vv~~v A ~ J! AiVNtNr C0'W,IQ~ PE-1059-76 and ZE-144-76 In the matter of a hearing on the application of Tupper Realty, Inc. East 12929 5prague, Spoka.ne, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Ridgemont Estates No. 2. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Single Family Residential (R-1) on the property described beloor, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats, of such pr•operty. The property being platted is described as follows: That portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. lying NEly and Ely of and adjacent to Ridgement Estates, being bounded generally on the east by the 2300 foot elevation contour line, being bounded generally on the west by the 2,075 foot elevation contour 12ne, and being bounded on the north by the north line of said NE 1/4. Spokane County, Washing°ton. (Between 16th and 24th Avenues, approximately 2800 feet east of Sullivan Road) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE 4F udASHINGTON ) ) SSo COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) , Being first duly sworn, deposee and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, lrlashington, and over the age of twenty-one year s o ~ G That on p~ , 19 ; he personally posted three (3) true and correct copies of the hereto attacned NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: ali/A za R4 ; 3. ';'n 0~ r , ; ' Subscribed and sworn to me I, 19 ~ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGI~ON Re siding at Spokane, Washington F - ~ y f•~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTN DISTRICT ~ Inter-Offi ce Communi cati on TH Date: November 15a 1976 T0: $p,okVe Couiltv Planniil,v_ Commissicaa[~ ~ • _J FROM : EVeene C. ]Plather, R. S. SUBJECT: Qronased preliminarv plat - RIDGEMQNT ESTATES N0. 2 • 1. Reference map of subject, scale 1" = 200' by Clark, dated Noveffiber 1976. 2. Vera [dater and power District has stated it can supply water for the proposal upon compliance by the developer with the District's rules and regulations. We reconunend the system provide for fire-f low protection in addition to domestic use water. 3. Public sewer service is proposed to each lot with treatment and disposal to be provideci through the treatment plant and drainfield now serving Ridgemont Estates N0, 1. We concur in this concept subject to the approval of detailed plans prior to the signing of a final plat and sub- ject to no sale of lots prior to installation of the system. An Operations and management agreement providing for management in perpetuity must be condluded to the satisfaction of the Health Off icer prior to the signing of the final plat. paf cc: Benthin & Clark RECIEiVFC NQY 1 jr ~~~&T^ SCHD-ADM-118 - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - ; 1534 Date ~ ~ Reeesved From . ~ o Address ' ~ Dol lars ~G , . , , ' Fo V' y ~ f-V ~ ~ ACCOIINY ~ HOW PA1D AMT OF ~i~o~~~~ ~adT~",~ P~~lTING CO9~LI~N ' ACCOUNT p I ~ CASH , APAT PAID CHECK BA CE MONEY OUE OR ER D ~ Y , . . : 8K806 Woo~4~~ . _ - - -=--i,7 E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM AREA AND DISTANCE ■ooooo00000oooooDOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0o0oOODOo Total atnount of land in thzs Subdivision: 42 Acres Proposed density of the P1.at : 1.5 Lots/Gross Acre '.i'otal amouni; of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 250 Acres Proposed use of controllecl adjoining land: agricultural and residential What is the driving distance in miles to tne nearest fire station? 2.5 miles Sllopping facilities? 2 miles Municipal. Boundary: 9 miles Paved street or highway? 0.5mi. Spokane LAIND USE ■DODOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOODODOOOOOOODODOQOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODO00000000000000 Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( x). Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi-famlly dwelling unzts ( Indicate which lots: Mobile Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses: Descrxbe any non-residential use proposed in th.e Plat: None 4Jhat is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? Agricultural & non-merch. timber Llst type of uses: Cultivated land: 20 acres. Pasture: acres. Timber: 22 acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres I s keeping of animals desired? 1Vo ( Yes ( TaYpe : IMPROVEMENTS MDOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOODO00000000000000000000000000000 Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi-phase dev- elopment? Multi-Dhase , . To what level of inlprovement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( Minimumo C-oxb anci Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( X Describe any combinations of above: What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: 3 ye ars Street -_mprovements completed? 3 years . Substantial number of lots occupied? 15 lots-1 vear Is dedi,;ation of any land for public use contempleted? (Paxks, schools, etc.) No. (x Yes ( Descrlbe: Indlcate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 1500 - up Square feet Number of bedrooms 3- up , Will buildings be built on the lots before they a.re sold: No ( X). Yes ( Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? No ( Yes ( x). if "yes", explain: Typical resfirictive covenants UTILITIES ■ooooo000000oooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOaooooo0oooooQO0ooooo0OO0oo Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( Lagoon ( Treatment plant (X Other, or combinations (Describe) Indicate the proposed source of water suprly: Individual wells ( Public system ( x). Private community system ( Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Undergx-ound utility easements ( x). Overhead utility easements ( Utilities in streets ( x). No easements ( Indicate the dlstance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main: adiace nt feet. Indicate size of nearest main: 6 Inches. List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: Electricity: Vera Gas: Water: Vera Phone: pNB , ' , E X H I B I T A Page 2 PRELIMIIVARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS •oooooaooooaooooaooooo0oooooaooaooooo0000000000000oooooaooooo0000 PROPOSED PLAT NAME: Ridgemont Estates No. 2 I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has been prepared by me under my supervlsion in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. p~ , o 0000 Si ed D te : ~ E ~ ~ ~ ~ a N.gyember,15 1976 ~Q~a ~ ddres) Bent~}in and Clark Phone: 534-3475 33 ~ ~ La n ~ ~$i ~ g~ d Surveyors, P. S.' ~ i o~ E a s t 2608 S p r a g u e A v e n u e Z i p : 9 9 2 0 2 qs' y 1 N Q,~ S pokane, 1Nashington _ SURV~ : please print I, .Tupper , the sponsor of this proposed subdivision, am the owner X; builder ( agent ( option holder ( contract holder ( of the property proposed to be platted and have completed the information requested of ine and do hereby testify that lt ls correct and accurate. "Tk..Q Q`r . . (Signed) -~"MA Date: November 15. 1976 (Address) East 12929 Spra e Avenue Phone : 92 8-1991 S ane, Washington Zip: 99216 . NOTARY - Dat e : 97 (.o , NOTARY SFAL: Special Comments: . - . ; ~ , ; . u - _ , r1 n ^ 1 ■ooooo0000000000000■ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT •0430000000000000000■ PLANNING DEPARTMIlVT IIVFORMATION Date Submitted: ~%!r~~~ ~ 7~ Checked by: q"*(0$ School District: Preliminary Plat Fee: Existing Zoning: , Date established: 7 - Zone Change File No. j~~ - 7fg Advertised Zone Upgrading: ~ ~ Number of Lots: Location: SectionA,y Township Range Plat File No. : __pp " ~ Plat Name : Vot 4 • _ . ~ . ~ No a 0156 BEFORE rrHE AOAPLD OF COUTZ'rY O4MI,33IONE.tS OF SPOKANE 0OUT3TY, '-rIP.'SHT_NG'P.ON o PZ--1059-76 ) ) I~'~ M, N~'i`,~T~.: OF FIL~~~ M FIrIAL ALAT ~ R E S 0 L U T 1 0 N FOP, RTDG:d r0iv T Z'STA`t LS #2 LOCAs ~ ni SECTIC~'3 259 Ta-MSHIP 25 N. * iWdG:; 44, ) ) BE YT RESOLVED BY ri'~IE BOARD OF COUNTY COMISSSONERS OF "1-POKANE (7,0UNTY, WASHINGTON, that the flna.1 plat of RIMY,Q~s~x hSTA1~ i'e'2 Tiaat portion of tae V~ of Scction 25, Towac,iip 25 RanC;e 44, Ls.Cl.N. Spokane County, Wachinoton. more preclsely described ln the plat dedication, on the recommer.dation of the Spokane County Planning Commassion, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exceptlon that the public rignts of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until tpie County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board o f County Commi ssioner s o PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS ~ DAY OF dffid~ B0ARD OF COUNTY C0MMISSIOIVER OF SPOKANE COUNTY, VIASHING20N o NARRY M. tARNEO CHM. - iF wvw . N ATTEST : W. e OHLAND .0 of ar B 4Zrk Deputy ~ - SPOKANE COUNTY PLA~,'r?ING COM1VtISSION North 8I: jefferson Spokane.. Vva: flin[on ~5201 january 24, 1978 Honorab te Board of County Commtssloners Spokane County Court Ho use Spokane, vkTA 99201 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, january 20, 1978, at 8:30 a.m. to 12:10, reconvening at 1:30 p. m. to 5:15 p.m. 1n the Health 8utlding Audltortum, Room 140. The enclosed actlon was taken and ts recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Nfembers Present: Mr. N?c Coury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, and the Nessrs.Quigley and Thomas. Planning Staff present: Bethards, Davis, Dayharsh, Swe:tzer, Wesche and Justlce. Engineer;s Office: Kennaly. Health District: Prather. Prosecutor's Office: Emaclo. Slncerely, SPOKANE 00 UNTY PLANNING COMNISSION Ted IVxcCoury, Chairman Fred L. Dayharsh, Dlrector of Planninq FLD:kj Offlctat minutes and record of actton taken by the Spckane County Plan- ning Commission at their regular hea: ing held on January 20, 1978 . 74 . , c IV:INUTES QF THE PLANNING COMNISSION HEARING OF JANUARY 20t 1978. VWHEREAS, the Spokane County Flanntng Commisslon dtd hold a public meettng on january 20, 1978 to consider the test[mony and requests of several applicants, objectors and other interested partles concerning the below referenced zone reclassl- ficatlons and other ttems of bustness, and WHEREAS, at satd hearing opportunlty was afforded those favoring and those opposing ail ttems of buslness, and WHEREAS, N,r. iVlcCoury, Ivirs. Byrne, lvirs. Rawlings, Messrs. Quigley and Thomes were t'n attendance and constttuted a quorum, and WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commfsston fully considered the testi- mony gtven, the envlronmental revlew, and all other evidence presented, recommend: to the Board of County Commisstoners the followtng: 1. After discussion of the Short Plat Ordinance, the following changes were adopted to be lncluded in the final draft of the Short Ptat Ordtnance which had been distributed to the Commission members at their january 13, 1978 hearing: a) Insert for Item 4.3 The Countv Enatneer. It shall be the duty of the County Engineer or his destgnated repcesentative (a) to revEew proposed short plats, as approprtate and app[lcabie, (1) for adequacy of survey Information and legal description; (2) general deslgn in respect to surrounding develop- ment, topography and road system conflguratfon; (3) access and need for public rlghts of way; (4) uttlity easements; (S) dralnage and flood protection requtrements; (6) prtvate and publlc road requirements; (7) sanltary sewer requlrements, If applicable; (b) to furnish his wrttten recommendations in respect to these ttem: to the Short Flat Adminlstrator; (c) to administer all engtneering requirements for engtneering, ;urveying, lnstallatlmn, bondtng, and inspection of engtneer requ,.ed tmprovements; (d) to requlre reimbursement by the appltcanfi for ali dfrect actual costs incurred in ceview and administratlon of the short piat; (e) to Issue a 'Certiftcate of Complfance' upon ftndtng of compliance wlth engineering requtremer.ts or satlsfactory guarantees for the same; said certtficake to be a condttlon requlrement as per Sectton 7.2 here ln . b) Mr. Emacio outiined the following suggested changes: 1) A provlslon should be tncluded in the ordtnance regarding long plats as well as the short piat standards. "Remedy of purchaser or trar.sferee. " 2) Page 15, paragraph 5.3 should be reworded. (3) should be de leted referring to the Board of CounLy Commis s loners . The Shor# P Lat Adminis'Erator should apFrove or dlsapprove the appllcation. 3) Page 14, Section 4.10, Ilne 4, shoutd read "wrtt of ceaVor- aa-! ` instPad of ' wrii of review". . • 4) Page 15, 5.3. Last sentence should be deleted -(stlence ts not an action.) c) Add a new section to read as follows; 4.3-d. To establlsh a schedule of fees for adoptton by the Board of County Commisstoners for all dlrect actual costs tncucred by the County Englneer's Department in the revlew and administration of the shoct plat. d) Iv1r. Quigley moved, Mrs. Rawlings, seconded, that the Short Plat Ordinance be recommended for adoptton to the Board of County Commis- stoners, lncorporating the suggested changes in ihe flnal draft. Notlon ' carried unanimously. 2. The Staff reported that work had been completed on a revised fee schedule structure and would be ready for presentatlon to the Commisslon members at a public hearing for their conslderatlon. Nrs. Byrned moved, Nrs. Rawlings seconded, that an evoning meettng be scheduled for thls business and sugqestE Wednedsay evening, Februaty 15th at 7:30 p.m. in the Health District Audltor- lum for this hear[ng. Motlon carried unanimously. 3. Dlscusslon among the Commtsslon members and Staff regarding the advlsabllltS and avallabfltty of certain plans pertalning to such vital areas as the Airport, West Plalns water area, Alewman Lake sewer plan, and the 1208' Plan, being presented for conslderatlon and revtew, resulted in the consensus of opinlon that an informational workshop meeting would be held. Thls is scheduled for . • Frtday, February 10, 1078, at 9:00 a.m. Thls preliminary discusston and review sesslon wouid be followed by a more detalled presentatlon to the Planntnq Commisslon on Wednesday, Narch lst. 4. PS-750C-70, SGUTH RIVGE FOREST THIRD ADDITI4rj: GUTHRIE. That the extenslon of tlme be granted. (Ivfr. Qulgley moved, Nr. Thomas seaonded. Vote • was unantmous.) 5. PW-930-73, SPOKANE LAKE PARK FIRST ADLITION; ZW-132-73, AGRICULTURAL T4 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN; ZW-132A-I 3, RGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAIV:ILY RESIDENTIAL: NELSON. That the extenslon of tlme be conttnued to the February hearing due.to an error ln advertlstng. (Motion by Mrs. Rawltngs, seconded by Mrs.Byrne . Vote was unanimous.) 6. PE-981-75, SOUTHERN'S MOVILE PARK; ZV1T- 7-75, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HUNE: W. F. TOUTHEkN, jR.. That the eatenslon of tlme be granted. (lVirs. Rawlings moved, Mr. Clulgley seconded . Vote was unan[mous.} 7. PE-1048-76, MONTE VISTA ESTATES; ZE-127-76, UNCi[1SSIFIED TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: WARV. That the extension of time be granted. (Mr. Thomas moved ancl Nr. Qutgley seconded. Vote was unanimous.) 6. PE-1052A--76, WALLACE SECONU RDDITION; ZE-131-76, AGRICULTURAL SUP.BURRAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTiAL and/or TWO FANILY RESIDE~,TT' That an extens6Qn of tlme be granted, Mrs. Rawlings movEd, seco^ dec~ ~y M-. Vote was ~ ,N o ^ r 9. . PE-1053- 76, GUTHRIE' S VALLEY VIEW EIGHTH A DDITION; 2E-132- 76 . AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: DAHLC1UIST. That an extension of time he granted. {Iv;r. C uigtey moved, Mr. Thonias seconded. Vote wa s 4 ye s a nd 1 nn 10. PN-1056-76, FEOr?E PINES ES'TATFS, ZN-135-76, AGRICULTtTRAL SUBURBAN and/or SINGLE FA.IVAILY RESIDENTML; DEVINCO, INC. That the extenslon of time be granted. (:VIr. Thomas moved, Mr. Qulgley secor.ded. Vote was unantmous. ) 11. PE-1059-760, RIDGEIV'iONT ESTATES NO. 2; ZE-144- 76, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: TUPPER, INC. That an extenston of time be ~ granted. (Mrs. Rawlings moved, T%Ars. Byrne seconded. Motion passed unantmously. ) 12. PE-892-73, PONDEROSA ACRES EIGHTH ADDITION; ZE-29-73, ArRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: LEMLEY. That this matter be conttnued to the Fehruary, 1978 Planning Comcntsslon hearing due to an error In advectlsing. (Mrs. Rawlings moved, seconded by Mrs, Byrne. Iviotion passed e:nantmously, 13. PE-11 SO-77, SALTESE RANCHETTES, ZE-180- 77, UNCLASSIFIED TQ AGRICUL- ~ TURAL: VIGUE. That the zoning be reclasstfted to the Agricultural zone.(Mrs . Byrne moved, Mrs. Rawtings seconded. Vote was unanimous.) 14„ PE-1I43--77; RAINBOV`1 ESiATES, ZE-163-77: AGRICULTURAL TO SINGTE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: lVLC KINLEY. To deny because the denstty is not appropriate in an zrea where the average parcel size is over three (3) acres. ( Ivlotion by IVirs. Rawlings, seconded by Mr. Culgiey. Vote was unar.imous.) 15. PN-1154-77, GREEN BLUFF ACRES, 7N-184-77, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICUL- TURp:L SUBURBAN: FRANCO. That the preiiminary plat tto be known as Green Bluff Acres, (Flle NurrbEr P24-1154-77) be 3pproved subject to the conditions as contalned In the Planning Staff's find!lzcis, dated january 20, 1978, with the added, conditicn that a stateme-mt be p 1nd In the dedlcatlon of the plat prohtblting rnobile homes as a dweiling un:r,, and that a proposzd declarat[on of Non-Signlflcance be tssuEd. (IVIr. Thoma.- moved, Mr. Quigley seconded. Vote was unanlmous.) 16. FJ,T-1156-77, AIRPOR"L' VILLAGE, 2W-194-77, AGRICULTURAL TQ RESTRICTED II~.IDUSTRIAL: LUCAS. That the rnatter be contlnued for one month to see the plan of the Airport and the z/~est Flatns Water Plan with the Scaff addressing rriore information on the adequacy of the water In the matter of matntenance of the landscape and flre protection. Gnly testlmony to bE taken is that of the Staff reports of the above mentioned ttAms. (Tvlotion by N1rs. Rawltngs, secondzd b y Nr. Thorna s, Vote wa s unanlmous o) - 3- PC-~~, THRESHOLD DETERMINATION DECLARATION OF • i (proposed/final) - ~Y~"~ ■ . G s . ~y~ SPCKer+E COUN!r Cptei.t ktll,5C ON ~ p* (significance/nonsignificance) 1. Description of Proposal: 4O2 St 1J42 m FAA I LY LorrS Qk) 4•Z /~~ees oir SwP, m a r 5-2s' r~~ -re~ G~v~,; ~.vE_ LOT_.~~ Z-+-jL-5«a skpT. /-CEK-TaAL s EwACats 2. Proponen t: 7i3fP~ IfiC • 3. Contact Person: lmm Tl.JF 3. County Action(s) Requested: L. pL,KT A-Vj ZtY&)& C94*1S~, A i r wVA I., 4, Location of Proposal: TWlfvCo WLLS 1 DE MIL.E tFAST VF ~U~ ve~ ~.D. laeDami "D 2A-'P-Ayo 1 lu SPo~1~ S, Lead Agency: SrvTwAVE GOt~~~ This proposal has been determined to have a significant adverse impact on the envfronment. An EIS is required under RCW 43 .21C.030(2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency, 6. Responsible Official: eQ'Y W. C~awmr-N Position/Title: -LuAl QM&IS W- 60. OF COUN~ CDAAMIMOWRS Department: PL-,,WNIN~ 012T. e,c ~ VDate: tZ-/2-1/ -7(- (final) Signature: (final) Pj p6-Ip9j-% SEPA PIC Refer. ('2d) Departme t Reference #:?.Lr- a$ec~ -STPA P 1'Z'l~e ~ e r. n: 7 . (See Reverse Side) 12 7. For Declarations of Significance Only: Date of Expected Draft EIS Availability (determined by Responsible County Official) Date Entered in "ETS in Preparation Register" (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) To be completed by responsible official: a. Brief description and listing of those environmental impacts leading ko such declaration: b. Brief explanation of what measures, if any, could be taken to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts of rhe proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of nonsignificance: (proposed/final) g. For ProAOSed DeclaratiorYS of Nonsignificance Only: Date Entered "Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance Register" (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) Date comments to be received (15 day review period) (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) 9. SEPA Public Information Center: (For departments of General Government only) ( Approved as to form ( ) Disapproved as to form Reasons: Signature of SEPA PIC Officer: Date: 13 CpGy `_,bPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Y Inter-Offi ce Communi cati on 4~TH O~S1 Date : Dpcpmher 10,, 147f+ T0: John Nunnerv, Suokane Countv Planni4Q Commission FROM: Eugene C. Prather, R.S. SUBJECT: EIS Checklist for - RIDGEMONT ESTATES N0. 2 , 1.Reference: subject documnent, November 15, 1976. 2.In the explanation for paragraph 3(f) on page 18, a statement is made that "ground water" flow will be altered. The wording leads me to ask if the writer intended "surface water flows would perhaps be altered." If the latter is not the case, then a general explanation of the method and extent of the ground water flow alternation should be made. 3.Please advise. paf ' ~ ~ . ~ 9 vy ✓ V / ~~O~~V V, l ~ . PC, ~ -0L &C6 dew _&Y RECF 1VF C NIANNING a0~i~I()SCHD-ADM-118 t ~ • _ . ~ 6 1 7.~~R 'C ,e~ ~ ♦ \ Y } ` 4 ~~.~a ~~-.y~'•~~~ .....y. -SsO~ANC COUnfI CC~k' NOLSE ENVIRONMENTAL Ci3ECI{LIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals, The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determi.ne whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to youo Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the dearee of impact, asking you tor more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decisfon-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessarX. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review wYthout unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your Cotal proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form rnay be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination, , 1VOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. I :s ~ • F ~ , ~ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I , BACKGROUND 1, Name of Proponent: Tupper Incorporated 2. Addres s and Phone Number of Proponent: Ea st 12929 SDraaue Ave nue Spokane. Washinaton 99216 --a2 8-L9 91 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane Countv 5. Name of Proposal, lf Applicable: Ridaemont Estates No.. 2 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- standing of its scope and nature): a c 69 c cont~. 9 a n rr~ ~ n f cl,pp.ing (S -2 5%) partially treed qround. A curvelinear street svsten: with larae , (24.500 sq. ft. averace lots arld a central sewaae CailP_ytinn SystPm aDd di,sp~ osalp,lant arP major element.1; _ 7, Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, fncluding any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal) : Thf s propo s al lie s on the s lobina hills ide betwee n the Sookane Val lev ILQ_or and the bench west of Salte,sp. Flats _ T is SLrrn und.d by similar hillSidp- c7rnlinc3 tn thP nnrthPaSt anc3 sn>>th est farm lan(3 tn thP PA--,1- _ resi_dentia], sLbdivisinns tn fihP Sni~th~n~P~t~ an nartiallu dPVPlopPrl Valley floor to the west and northwest. 8, Estfmated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 1980 9, List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required fcr the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones) : '.a lth a_gencfes must anp=P w-ater and sewer p an~. IIPra Trriaatinn T)i.-;trint <3.TCl S130kanP va11l-T F,ir.P n; qtr.iCt.mu..st..ap.prn.ve watPrpla n sz 16 ~ ~ . . • (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAG£S.) 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal ? If yes, explain: Property west of this is owned by the proponent also and has been , approved by the Spokane County Planning Commission for resid n al aevelopment, appealed to the Board of County Commissioners and is awaiting thefr decisfon. 11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: No . 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; it none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: A plat application form is submitted herewith. II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth, Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic s tructures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? , , . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features ? x (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique X geologic or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . - (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site ? . , . , , , , , , , , , , , , 1 X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in sfltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of X the ocean or any•bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: (b) Street, water line , sewer, and house construction and accompanying disruptions, displacements, and compaction* (c) Minor topographic changes from reqradinq of streets and home sites _ 17 J f• • -A J A (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yaa MsZ.Ybe ED 2. Air. Will-the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X ~ x (b) The creation of objectionable odors ? . . . . . . . . . - (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: (a) Road constructi= wiU cause air nollution of a tempora y naf.uLe, • 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in cunents, or the course or direction of water movEments, in either marine or fresh waters ? x (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff X ^ (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water x body ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground X wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception x of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? . . . . . . . . - (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? X ~ (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: (b) A portion of the site may be made impervious to water because of house, street, driveway, etc, construction, (t) Some alteration of ground water flow may be necessary to avoid conflicts with building site and road constructfon. (g) (h) (i) Quantity and quality of ground w.ater mav be chanqed by the addition of users to a svstem. 18 (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 7. Liqh t and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare ? x _ Explanation: Electric street and house liqhtina will increase the amount of artificial liaht in fihe area* Glare from riaiiiral licih„t can be tncreased iD residential developments due, to the usP nf glc'~SS anr] nt}'1e" 1"Pf1P.r,tiyP. materials _ Yes Maybe No 8, Land Use. Will the proposal result in tfie alteration of the ~ present or planned land use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: Present land use will be altered as previously explained. Yes Mavbe No 9, Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x Explana tion: Yes Maybe No 10, Risk of Unset, Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) X in the event of an accident or upset conditions _ Explanation; 20 . (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITTONAL PAGES,) Yes Mavbe No 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? . , , , , , , , x _ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any linique, rare or endangered species of flora ? . , , , , , , , , , , . X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of X existing speczes? . . , , , , , , , , , , , , , . (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop X _ Explanation: (a) (c) (d) This land has been Dartiallv plantPC1 in cxrass and cer-eal crons and thtis d_vPlo m_n intn residPntia 1)ronPr~..ty--wi11 rP-,„lt in 1"P_dl]('!tlnn pf acreaqe in an aqricultural crop, decrease in wild flowers and weeds and an increase in lawn and qarden trees, shrubs. qrasses. and flowers* Yes Mavbe No 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or rnicrofauna) ? . . . , . . . , , , , , , , x (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or X endangered species of fauna? . , , , , , , . . , , ` (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or X result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna _ x (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _ Explanation: (a) (d) Due to the change in land use there will be an increase in dome sticated bird s and animals and a decrease in wild fowl and other ani.mals. Yes Mavbe No 6. Noise. Wi11 the proposal increase existing noise levels? x ~ ;xplanation: Residential land use vields hici er uoisP levels, at most times than does aaricultural land usP, 19 1 . (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No (c) S chool s ? . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , x _ (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . , , , . , . x (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x _ (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . x Explanation: All governmental services 1isted abQVe will be altered snmPwhat by this development. It will not reauire new qnvPrnmPntal SPY'iTl(`.PC Yes Maybe No 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: • Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas ? , . . . . . . . . . . . . . x ~ (b) Communication systems? , . . . . . , , . . , . . x x (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? , . . . . . . . . . . . x X (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . , . . . . . . . . . X _ Explanation: Alterations fio all the oresent, s.yst _ms lisfiPd ahnVp «~~p necessary to provide service to this devPlc)t~mPnt_ 22 ' • - ~ ~ . . (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 11. Population, Will the proposal alter the loca tion , ~ distribution, density, or growth rate of the human popula tion of an area ? , , , , , , . , . . . , , , , . X Explanation: Redistribution of AopulatiQn is inherent in a11 r.s'd .n 'al developments, The densitv. crrowth rat,e: and lo .atinn nf pnnulatinn nf population of tjjL-5 specifir. area yvill hP altered 12. Housinct, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: The above mentioned redistribufiion will affect existing housinq, Yes Maybe No 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement ? . . . , , X _ (b) Eflects on existing parking facilities, or demand for ' x new parking ? . . . . , . , , , , , , , , , , , (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems ? X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or x movement of people and/or goods? , , , , , , , , , (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ~ (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians ? . , . , , , , . . . . , X Explanation: (a) (c) (d) Relocation of population will generate additional vehicular movement in this area, will have monor impact upon transportation systems, and will alter circulation natterns for a limited number of ,,P p1P., Yes Maybe No 14. Public Services, Will the proposal have an effect upon, ~ or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas ? (a) Fire protection? . . . . , , , , , , , , , , , , X ` (b) Police protection? , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , X ' 21 . s _ . • ~ L y III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the above information is tnie and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. Tk,e ~ t.v ~ Praponent: (Please Print or Type) Proponent: TuAp r T "nmnratPri Address: East 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washinaton 99216 Phone: 928-1991 Benthin and C lark Person completing form: Daniel B, Clark T,and SurvPynrc p,-S, East 9803 Sprague Avenue Phone: 534-3475 - anP~,, nTashingtn.n 942 Cl? Date: November 15. 1976 Dept, or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Staff Ntember(s) Reviewing Checklist: ~ *M L ~ 24 • ` ~ . , (IF ~PACE FOR EXPLANATIOIV IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health, Will thP proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explanation: Ye s Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site X open to public view ? . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . _ Explanation: Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the X quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities _ Explana tion : Yes Maybe No 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a signfficant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building? . , , , , , , , , , , , , , X Explan ti n .~~~8~a'~F' L d' ~ R ' ~ ✓~i~; n r ~ u 23 . ; _ . , ~ ;c5e - . - ' • .I ~ ~ ' _ . . . -F , SPOhANE COUnTY COJRT MOUSE STATE of WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT Envfronmental Checklist f~1 oG~lut~~1Z ~T~T~S ~2 proposal 76 file number 0 ~vtv ' BPOHAN$ COIINTY PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2274 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 itn 11 s:l(T)L'~IC:1 - , . 1 iHr lii~uranCC Cam{►nny - - ~ TiilC I11SUrr1nCC' Sc'rviccs P 1orih 720 Argonnc Ftpnd + s-~•'-~ > :po'r,:tnn, :'la;hinglon 0920b " ~,r ' • (509) 922-2222 i;~~ • . , . CERTIFICATE TO PLAT ' Order r1o.: 83593-M AMENDED CERTIFICATF TO THE PLAT Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of RIDGEMONT ESTATES N0. 2 Spokane County Planning Commission N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, 14ashington Gentlemen: In the matter of the nlat submitted for your approval, this Comnany has examined the zecords oF the County Auditor and CounttT Cler'tc of Spokane Countv, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said Countv, and from such examination hereby certifies that thE title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to-wit : As hereinafter set forth; VESTED IN: TUPPER, INC., REALTORS, a Washington corporation whose true corporate name is TUPPER INC., a Washington corporation r~:CEP'1'I~.~NS : 1. 1% excise tax, if unp aid. 2. nEr,n OI' T1'UST ANn TZ'T: T1711`1 ANn r(~TTP'CTInr1!~ 'Z)'T'T'rnF; _ ~'Y=►_r+~Y : TunnEr Irc., Pcaltoxs,,-). 17.-js1.:+_nRto- cornoxation Trustee: Transamer.ci_a Title Znsurance Company Beneficiary: Bancshares riortgage Company Amount: $504,000.00 Dated: August 31, 1977 ' Recorcled: September l, 1977 Recording No.: 709010107 Records examined to Septenber 27, 1977 at 8:00 A. M. TRANSA1~1ERICA TITLE INS/r.t~.~~ICE CO~tPA.i'`IY . . ~ By. cc: Inland Pacific Engineering ~ cc: Tupper Inc. Realtors kk ~ - r , . FV-1E ND E D G E RTZ'~Z CA ~ wTp ~ Orcier iio. 53593-M. ' DnscriptZOn ; August 23, 1977 . 1 DESCRIPTION: 'r ~ • A portion of -Lhc idorLheas t quarter of Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 E. W. M. , being more partibularly described as follocas : Beginning aL LIic S.E. corner of Lot 24, (31ock 2 of Ricic}eircont Estates as per pl clt thereoF recoi-cfeci i n aooE: 12 of pl a I:s , pa ge 36 i n the Spokane County ~ lludi tor's OfFice; therice alony the bound(iry of said plat i:iie follot-»ng three (3) cot,rses ; 1. i•1. 03°00' Z2"lJ. , a cii s tance of 599.90 feet; 2. S.86059' 3B"l-J. , a clistarice of 133.07 fcet, 3. P1.41033`4414., a distance of 478.46 feet; thence fN1. 39°?_()' 16"E. ,a di s tance o F 597.23 feet; theiice ~1.56026' 16"E. , a di s tcince o f~54.] 2 feet; thence N. 56011 ' 51 "E. , a di stance of 59.94 feet; theiice S. 56016'59"E., a distance of 195.09 feet; thence t4.45053'35"E., a distance of 477.84 feet to l;he M. 1i16 corner of the Id.E. 1/4 of said Section 25; thence S.89016'42"E. along the north line of the Pd.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of s.a i d SectiQn 25, a di statice of 585.25 feet; thence S.33001' 22"lJ. , a di stance. 698.46 feet; tlience S.12022'01"14., a CllStdrlC@ of 558.86 feet; thence S.13013'42"VJ., a di5 tdnCe of 291 . 94 feet; thence S.64053' 44"i-1. , a di sLance of 269.49 feet; tlience S. 07°5G' 30"t-t. ,a cl i s l.ance of 656.97 feet; tiience S.47011' 3011 l.l. , a distance of 0I5.00 feet to the S . E . corner of l_ot 1 7 , alock 3 of said recorded pl a t o F Ri dgcvnont Es tai:es thence al ong t { ~ c boundary o F sa i d~71 a t the fol 1 ok-ri ng ti~~io (2) COUrses; 1. FI.O6a39'Q2"E. , a distance of 785.79 feet; 2. ~d.44°57' 17"E. , a d7stance of 79.83 feet ta the S.E. corner of Lot 24, [31ock Z of said plat and point of beginniny of tllis description Situate in t'zE C:ounty of Spol:ane, 'tate o'. T-'a rrt~0 n . _ r V ~ STO112NI DRAIVAGE EASERZENT AND RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT ; THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between 4 Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife, residing at South 2009 Sullivan Road, Veradale, Ulashington 99037, hereinafter referred to as thE "Grantors," and Spokane County, a municipal corporation of the State of frJashington, having offices for the transaction of business at West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington 99201, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee," jointly, along with the Grantors hereinafter referred to as the "Parties." The parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: l. lhe Grantors, husband and wife, in considera- tion of $1.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledqed, and other good and valuable consideration, do hereby convey and release to the Grantee, easernents and rights-of-way for a storm drainage system over and across lands owned by the Grantors and situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, a description of which is attached hereto and designated Exhibit "A". Said storm drainage easement is intended to exclusively benefit the property particularly described in Exhibit "B'°, attached hereto, hereinafter referr_ed to as the "Developed Property." The purpose of said drainage easement is to provide an arEa for flowage and storage of storm water run-off originating on or flow- ing through said developed property. PROVIDED, IzOI^]EVEF, it is understood by the parties that this drainage easement shall not preclude or prevent the natural flow of water onto, over or across the land described in Exhibit "A" fzom properties other than those described in Exhibit "B". ~ ~ ♦ i.! ♦ i' 3'- - ar4v • + q'r'' ~'~:L~ ~i rS...~..r'~3N"`.~... w _ IPbi,,y~ w'~ea..^_.WS~ .rr.~.~Z'a..d~ *.,...~."~£t µ r it` x L.^~'.. ='r% k.~J~ / . 4 S - ' ~ 2. Al1 construction, maintenance and repairs of said storm draining system shall be the sole responsibilty of the Grantors and shall be in conformance with the storrn drainage plan as approved by the Grantee. The Grantee has no right to enter upon the land described in Exhibit "la" except as provided for in paragraph 4, and except with the prior consent of the Grantors. 3. The Grantee shall have the right to inspect such storm drainage system and to determine and require con- formance caith the storm drainage plan as approved by the Grantee. 4. '1'he Grantors hereby release the Grantee from any and all claims, actions, and damages of every kind and nature whatsoever including inverse condemnation accruing to the Grantor arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the failure of said storm drainage system. The parties recognize and acknowledge that the storn drainage system has been dESigned to accommodate a storm of ten year frequency. mo the extent that the storm drainage system fails as a result of a water flow or flood in excess of the ten year frequency, the Grantors waive any and all claims, actions and damages which they may have against Spokane County as a result of injury or damage to themselves or any of their real and personal property. 5. The Grantors agree to furnish the Grantee prior to the execution of this agreement their abstract of title showing marketable title on the date of this agreement. 6. The grants of the easement and the rights-of- way as well as the indemnity agreement shall run with the lands and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, successors or assigns. -2- ' •,~•,g ' - ~ ~ : :s~io~.~ ~ ~ _ ~ * ~ .w ~~~,,~r~,c~'~~~~i,".~`~-~~~~ Sr , ~a ,~~"~"~",~~~7~,~`~~, ' '^.t~ , ~`~'~'wQ°' '''1~ ~ ~L..1 ,r-' i » ' ~Ir' C ~ • ' ,y • ~ J_ ~L~.~~~~'''!'~~,y~!.. Jr'~`y~!'°a • ~.~i/d~~...r ~1' ~ ~'~5'y "~~~'X Rii~~~ rI~.i.4.'~.'. M ~KT ~~°tw+ y .r ~••"'S,~Tr'~~_rC.."' .r.Z T _n': "N~'~°-.. N ~ . _ 7':.."-w• .7'~CY 'y'..: '7~• t, `~d ~~~~5`~q~i.~ IN WITNESS WHERLOF, the parties hereto have eYecuted thi s agreement on the 9th day of February , 1978. GRANTORS ~ . /A • 1 r/ll~l/ v ~ (.-~'V /.~c{ . ~ GRANTEE SPOKAr1E COUNTY, a, municipal cor- poration of the State of Washington Board of County Cor.lmissioners ATTEST: V . OHLAI ~e of the o d c Deputy Clerk STATE OF ►aASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTX OF SPOKAiNE ) On thisday personally appeared before me ALFONS B. RENZ and HILDA E. RENZ, to me known to be the individuals des- cribed in and who executed thE within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledge that they signed the same as tlzeir free and vol_untary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein nientioned. . EN under my hand and of ficial seal this ,W - d a y o f'~.~-- 19 7 8. , No`~~Cry- Pbblid ifi and or the State of ti~lashington, resid~g at Spokane -3- _ - - - . - - - - - . _ . ~4, ~~~.~,~~,~►,~t .T 44. y A 'T V T7 JM1M 9 ~i I ' ~ ~ t .t~r, • _ , a~' _n,. ° _ ' ~~"'~i~" ..~a, - + ~ _ j, ,R .y.. r e~ "b : 1,. _w~ ~ f r,.2t,,y~'~'•'`,{ w4'~ire,ti r`~r''1'h~ll" •~~~'hY~`r'~e"!•R~~~~?K'y~T"}V.~~1tilaN,~ ''p'.~~y'~i'I ``M"P`.~~' ~Si e,IMr'Y`'Y .y , ~ ~L~'~~~~ '~'}N..; t"1~~.`3d" t31. ~'~a+~ _ p. • ~ - - : . 4 EXHIBIT "A" Description (Drainage i-etention pond si te) That portion of the NE'~, NW'4 anci the (q!J~; NF',; of SeCt10r1 25, T.25Pl. , R.44E.tJ.h1., Spokane County, Washington, heinq iiiare partic:ularly ciescr°ibed as follQws: Beginnit7g at a point that is S.390 16'42"E., a distarice of 626.85 feet from the N.14 corner of Section 25, sai d point heing comi,ion to the nort?l boundary of Sectian 25 and the west boundary of Leo f1. Cashatt and others, as establ i shed by a survey perforincd by Adai,is Cn(jinecri nrj 7 n 1 976; thence along saad Cashatt tvest boundriry, the Followinq t4V0 courses; 1) S.30 08112"E., a distapceof 152.25 fect; 2) S.50 22'25"C., a distance of 28.00 feet; thence S.52 30,00 14., a distance of 135,07 feet; thence S. 30 22' 04"E. , a distance of 119.42 feet; therice S. 56 26' 16"!,J. , a di stance of 49.06 feet; tlience N.30°22'00"W. , a distance of 11U4 feet; thence 5.52 33'00"W., a distance 5 307.71 fect; thence S.50 22'00"C., a distance of 1L82 feet; thence S.39 26'16"W., a distance of 4Q.00 feet ; thence N. 50 22' 00"W. , a distrince o~ 161 .19 feet; tlience S. 45 39' 33"U1. , a di stance of 389.84 feet; thence S.50 33'44"E., a distance of P9.11 feet; thence S.39 26'16"1,1., a distance og 40.00 feet: thence Pa.50 33'4411I-1., a distance of 293.47 feet; thence S.45-39'33"W., a distanco- of 88.90 'Jeet; thence S. 76 35' 00"lJ. , a distance 5 1 n4. 00 feet; thence 5.07 35' 00"W. , a di stance of 2Z5. 00 feet; thence S. 59 05' 0J"ld. , a d i stance of a44. 00 feet; thence N. 39 38' 14"W. , a distance o~ 57.50 feeC; thence P!. 21 52' 0r)"E. , a di stance of 2a0.00 feet; thence N.85 21'5714., a disi:ance oF 29~.12 feet; thence N. 49 09' 34"E. , a di stance of 922. OQ Feet; thence Iq . 62` 14' S9" E. , a d i s tance of 551.95 feet to the point of beginninq. Containing $.86 + acres. i ~ + ~ ~ f ~ ~ . .r'rTMR ~ f . CERT17'~~~~E T~ PLA+l' GtClex No. 33593'IH r ~ Do-crX. pL7 C7 n - ~ EXHIBI~ ~~B" AupLisL 23, 1917 % . DESCRYPTZON: . A port ioiZ ot Hic I`d or[^ i ~ ~ ~ ~ c qu, i rL ci tJ 01 SuuLitcm 25, '1' own3 iup 25 Mo rLh, R,inge 44 E.[J.M. , bei_t7g~ 1),-irrxbu1al-1y clescr:ibcci as 101.1_owS Bcg1nimirl a! flw C. c{tirner ol' L[,,(_ I~luc1; 2 nr 10{1Ejcfilr~lfl. 10'Itt}s (iS per F)jt~t IN70rccjf o~~cnfi-r~r~rf ill 12 c,f pla ls, }aatjc -16 in Lhe ;pokamp (:ounty 11u(1 p Lor' s Office, Lf7c,mc} lunct Ll7e bound-ii-y of sti7d jjf ar Lho f~~~ loti,rlnrl Lhree (3) ca~~~~ses, 1. a di r Lancc of 599.190 fc?eI , '6', 5.86059 '-30810W ~ a rii stfi iice o f 7-13 07 fce t, 3. a ci7sl.am:c (if 1178.46 fec.yl; LheG7ce N. 39026' 16"E. , a di s Lancc of 597. 2-il feet; i,Fir.,nc~ 5V2W1r}"L- disf.nr7cu of ("'5~.12 f~et; t}nm-a-, 'J. ~6()1 r'51 'E cfir~an(.c f)f Ld}unk, Sl . I~~~1) 1 4) I (-,911 F {I I 7 I.il (i o ILL E9[} W) fl,(. t y ~ heR~cr I+ 'I P I.7[}" I_ } C~ distcinc~.} of 171.,14 1/16 1f7r, fl a 1/11 nf s;~~id Soc:lion 25, t hencl, a ] udira UIP fl{lr• Lll f ~ rlf' 0 r E hP if 1- . I fl t 1ie H, L 1 m o f 5,i7d ~i_'C;t1011 25r a dWL,wce t1f 585.?J f('C't?U1C'licE' 7~~{_~~ .a r} L~~kS~r7d1CC.' G98AC) fvof,; LIicilicr= dis1.am•ry oF ;,"0 t,hrxnce S.131)13'421)., r, (li , tc7~lcc c) r 2,) I.ci{i fi ; liwrice ] ~ai~}5,11'41'l! , 41 t~~ ~69 }l~) fectr 1.lw-nc;7 ~11~;,~~` ~',f~°'I•~ , R~ fI is a aw.e of "T f c,c,f , Hwr7c1r~ ~ /174~] I ' j0"',!. , ti clis~aiice tif 075 00 frf}~ ~o 11J7o JA.. mi'flr_-v ol 1W i!, Bl{}6' 3 of said 7•nr:ord€:d C,7 cit OF 1o~ictejnont L=s k.~~ ~ r} a, f Iicrit.o alori+I ~6tc t7mmr1,i7-5r, r, f{,ajrl Ijk;_. tPrc fol1c1011~~9 t 4'41 0 ( c Qu I `_~e i, I ii.06,~~~~~- "E- {![r, Lcwt f' C1f ,lv'y j[1 rrf'1., ~I lf4+€) 5 7 ' 17~~i..• ~ ~i cfi~x,iwc nf 711.,113 Uc. +--c?nlr~~• af ~_od 4fl, BlocI, ~ t~~ saacl p1ot arit9 paint of begir7~~ing of tlwis rlesc.i,7pLimE .7a.tuc~t-c ln 4~~~ ~~~unL-V of- ~f,..AA?o?tanc+ e'~L'aL.e af° i -rrl r`}T1 Y~ , ~ ,r. ~ ~!p ~ ~ 1 - Y" ~ ~ ~R ~ ~r ~ S I ~ T I ~v ~ ~ ~ fi _ N~~+ ~R ;~r 1~7~ ~P[~K AN ~CC~~h~TY ~~l. L~~i~ F IL~ ~ ~ , . - ~ ° PARG~L ~~i~Cl1~~NT . c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - A1U~"~~R ~UM3~~ 4~5ESS,~~ L~wr~tR L~GA~ ~ES.RxP~I,~N ~'F PR~~_RTY T41t~AYvR 4-~~ 4~~' L N A~H~4TT ~ 2~ 2~ ~4 ~T I~~~l4 ~F N~ C~S1~~~f1 '~E~ fid ~55 l 4 ~ ~9~C C ~f4C~~G Q~ '~l t~~ SE~ 3~04FT E t~~ HW~~'R ~F ~E~ ~~I 5~~~}'~G B~~~N ~ ~ 4~°'~ ~1ST 1'~1.U~9FT T~ C QF ~~~K ~1qt~~D fi~! ~510~G ~~'~►I~1 ~lb4.C~~~' TO C~~ S~G4~A?~E 4~A 4~2~~ ~ ~ _ M' F F ~ ~ F~R 1'~,~~ 4~ZN I. ~IA T1~ 55~D~G ~7'~II~ _l~BFfi 'f~ PII~., RE~ 14~~, IM D~A~I `fi~ N~LY ~37~T N~ ~l~ 'S~~ 13~['~fi W ~F N~CCIR ~?F ~H W~Sb~T Tp '~~~G . ~4°~~r4-~d~8~i 318759~ Iq~E~AI, CEfi1~~JT C~] ~4 Z5 44 ~"~N ~F S~1l4 QF I~~AL ~~S~C IN'~ Il~~ ~ T~~ ~ 7~+ 1' 44' . t _ , , ~~I ~14. ~T 51~ C'~R 1 ~ T#~ Ni~ZD~+G ~'~MI~d ~ H E~ TH 1~ F~ _ ~ ~c ~ ~~l~~~r G~~~~ ~~I ~~~Q~ ~~~I~') ~~94~ ~~1~~~~ ~~M~~~ ~ ~ ~CG^J} T~ ~~~~C~J J~l~1~~ ~;1~~~ R~~~♦~7~ I~ ~~~~r~~~ finl Rl~~i~C~ ~tJ ~~R . ~ 2~544-9q9~ b~t~4~bC VERl~ I~R #1~ ~~-t5-44 PTN PlF ~E114 ~F Y~~4 ~RR DIST _ ~ 4 F' e~+ fi cL~~ R fi y~ 4*} T~N T~i '~r P,~+~ p TN 'V5 1 P,~'FT N ~r #t rR~~ Rry 54 ~ ~C'l~ ~ ]11 1~ ~1 L~ ~ VG ~!fJ ~1• V IJ . r , ~ ~1~ ~t ~ FT fi ~ 4 T R R T'~ 56~+_ ~G 39M~. ~~35~5 E~r~~. 3 N 5.3~.G 3 1~It~ S~Sf~S ~~fi€}Ffi G IV A1' ~Gt~N~'HE ~ ~ RR T~I ~ ~M ~W 4~J 75~'~~ T~1 S~LN ~H W~ FT TQ P~~ SP~~AN A r ~ I~ S3 '~~G ~y I ZS 'S ~ i ~ ~ 4~ ~ ~ 4 ~4544-'4G5~ 317136C ~~RR~~i' R ST~~h ' ~~t 44 ~ 112 ~F S~ 11~ STE~~ kARR'~N R ' b ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~tC B_G AT 5~! C{Ii~ T~ FI~O~~T ~W ~b1~~G 45~IN ,~7'~~~T T~+ E~4 ,FT TH 5~+~~ 5~1~E+~ SC~d~1 ~~6~~1' T~ ~3~+D~G C~M1I'V '~~,1~44FT ~H w37~~T T~ Pt~R V'E~~?~~1~ 4~b~~ ~~G~? M ~55+44-QC~11 ~Z~7~~~ 5~~~~PEL~.~ E~A ~ ~5 ~5 44 r~L1~* OF '~~~/4 S~CRP~~.i~I CHAR'~'~5 ~4 F 4 P g~ F AV ~~t C~ S~EI/ 1 c, ~ ~ ~P:~~tAh~~ ~A 5~2+~~ ~ I 7 P T ~1R P~. r; R~ ~Q~'~~t~I~~~ P4R~~LtS~ FC~J~~~ {7N 'F~~~ 1 IN U C~S ~C~ ~S~ p ~ C~ ~ ~ • R P ~kT ~J H H ~ S S ~U~~I~!~1' ~AT~• I~~'U~f C~0.Rp'~ P ~ELS ~1 ~I ES F 7 ~~+~3~ ~~.~'C~~~ 17 5 l ~ ~~~K~l~~ G~tu~f f Y FL~~f~Nif+1~.~ c~~~#M - ~ ~,r#i~i~ ~w~~ ~ r~s ~uo~~~~~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ - 4 / , . ~ no ~ ~ - ~ ~c~ . c~ ~ _ , ~ n , ~t, . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . t~~~. - ~ F ~ ~ ~ , ; ~ - ~ a - - - I ,7~r+ RI . ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ry rJ ~ ~ _ ~ , ~ ~ {,;,5~,~ ~ ~~a . ~ -T' .ti ' _ ~ _ ~ ~ I f = . _ 1 ~ ~ ~y f~} +L ~ ` M1r . ^7~ 4. + . : p+ . ~x ~ ✓ ~ ~ , ~ ~ f ' ~ ~ _ . 'L~ . ♦ ~ . - ~ . ~ . ' ' ti 6 ~ , ~ ~1 • ~ , l~ ~ _ ~ - - . f ( ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ _ , ~r ~ , _ ~ - - - --4 - PREIJIv~INARY 5U8~IVISIDNS, EXTENS~ON5 OF T3IVSE (Conttnued) 5. PE--1052A-76 - VvALLACE SECCNDADDITION: REDLIN ZE- 131 --76 - AGRICUL'TURAL SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FANf~LY F?E3"I]~ENTIAL. and./qr rNO--FAMILY RE~IIDEhiTIAL , A. The prelEminary plat submittal has been gfven condittonal apprcvai by the Board of County ~ommfssioners ta r]ecember 1, I977. It would appear that reason- able pragress has been made by the applicant tov+rards meeking the conditions of approval that have been imposed by the Board, B. The appl ica nt ha s notified the Flannf ng Depa rtment Sta ff tha t he is desirous af obta[ntng an extensiorl of tlme ta February 1, 1979 so that he might have additfon- al tLme tv meet all aonditions of appraval that have been Lmposed. 6, PE-1053-76 - GUT14RYE'S VALLEY VIEW B'TH ADDIfiION: DAHLC;UIST ZE- 132-76 - AGRiCLTLTtJRAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESI~ENTIAL A. the prel Lmirxary plat submlttal has been given conditional approval by the Board of County GommlssLoners to December 1, 1977, It would appear that reason- able progress has been made hy the appl[cank tovvards rneettng the condltfans of approval that fnave been [mpvsed by the Bnard. B. The appl[cant has notified tfne PIannfng Departrnent Staff that he ts desl;rous of obta } ning a n exte asion of tLme to February 1# 1979 so that he might haue additlon- ai tkme to meet a!t conditlans of approval that haue been [mposed. f ; PN-1V56-F 6 ! PEti/~~ PINLFS 13SiTLTESi DE•INVOT INV • ZN- 135-76 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL A. The preiim[nary plat submf ttal ha s been given canditiona1 spprova lby the Board of County CommLss[oners to December If 1977, It wvuld appear that xeason- able progress has been rnade by the appllcant tawards meeting the condItLons of approval that have been Lmposed by the Board. B. The appl€cant has nok[ffed khe Planning Department Skaff that he is des[rous of ohtafntng an extenslon af ~ime to February 1, 1979 sa that he mlght have adEd#tion- al tlme to meet all conditions of appravat that have beer~ imposed. 8. PE-1059-76 - RILGEMiON'T ESTATES NO. 2. TUPk'PER INC. ZE- 144-76 - AGRICULTURAL TO SIhTGLE FAMILY RESIDENTLAL, A . The prelLminary ptat s~bmtttal has been given cond.[tionai approval by the Board of County CommLss[oners to Jenuary 1, 1978, It would appear that reasonable progress has been made by the applicant towards rrieeting the conditLons of approval that have been imposed by the Baard. B. The applicant has notlfied the PlannEng Lepartment Staff that he is desirous of obtai!'1il1g C3 t7 PxtensioIl of ttIYYe to F.Pibrudry 1a 1979 SQ t he C3~~ght have a4..; dYfi $cn^ a,~ ~o meet a,'_k condLt[on~ approval that qave been imposed. r ~ Tr~~~~americ~' _ I ransameiica o t itle Insurancc Company ~ Title Insurance ServiccG rJorth 720 Argonne fload , -i ~r''~ Spokane, Washington 99206 , (509) 922-2222 . , R ~ E C E I V E OCT Ai 1977 CERTIrICATE TO PLAT SPOKANE COUNtY Order No. : 83593-M PLANNING DEPARTMENT AMENDED CERTIFICATF. TO THE PLAT Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of RIDGEI70NT ESTATES NO. 2 Spokane County Planning Commission N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, I-Jashington Gentlemen: In the mattEr of the nlat submitted for your approval, this Comnany. has examined the records of the County Audito.r_ and Countv C;lerlc of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the Lnited States Courts holding terms in said Count-Nr, and from such examination hereby cerLifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to-wit: As hereinafter set forth; VESTFD IN: TUPPER, INC., REALTORS, a Washington corporation whose true corporate name is TUPPER INC., a Washington corporation EXCEPTIONS• l. 1% excise tax, if unpaid. 2. nrrD Or TP<UST ANn TITr TF1'J'?S ATTD ('C`TTI)TTIn1'Ts rz1'rrrnF ; TunnEr Inc. , Realto.rs, a tTa-jl,i_nr►to-1 cornoxation Trustee: Transamerci_a Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Bancshares Mortgage Company Amount: $504,000.00 Dated: August 31, 1977 Recorded: September l, 1977 Recording No.: 709010107 Records exarmined to September 27, 1977 at 8:00 A. M. TR.ANSAMERICA TITLE INS~• CE COMPANY . By • cc: Inland Pacific Engineering , cc: Tupper Inc. Realtors kk i AXMTENDED CERTIFICATE TO PLAT j ' . Order No. 83593-M ' Descript:ion Augu s t 23, 1977 . . DESCRIPTION: A portion oF the Northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 25 North, Ra.nge 44 E.W.M., being more partibularly described as follows: BcJinning lt the "').E. coriier of l.at 24, aloGk 2 of RidcJemont Estates as per pl at thei-cof recordecf i n Qook 12 of pl a i:s, paye 36 i n the Spokane County Audi tor's OFFice, LhcncP along the boundary of saicl plat i:he- follqt-ring three (3) coiirses; 1. H. 03°UO' 22"W. , a d7 stance of 599.90 feet; 2. S.86059' 38"1J. , a clistancc of 133.07 fcet; 3. Pd.41033'44"W., a d15f:d11Ce of 478.46 feet; thence P!. 39°2616"E. ,a distance of 597.23 feet; thence N.56026'1611E. , a disi-ance of 254.12 feet; tlience N.56011'51"E., a distance of 59.94 feet; thence S. 56016'59"E., a distance of 195.09 feet; thence PJ.45053'35"E., a di s tance af 477. 84 feet to the 1-I. 1/16 corner of the (I. E. 1/4 of saicl Sec:tion 25; thencP S.89016' 42"E . a1 ong the north 1 i ne af the 11. E. 1/4 of the M. E. 1/4 of s~~ i cl Sec L7on 25, a di s taiice of 585.25 feet; thence S. 33°Ol ' 22"W. , d CIl St1t1CC. 698.46 fee t; thence S. 12°22' Ol "G4., a d i s i:a nce o f 558.86 Feet ; thence S.13013'42"W. , a distance of 291.94 fcer, thence S.64058'44"l-l., a CI15tdr1Ce of 269.49 feet; thence 5.07056'30"W., a distance of 656.97 feet; thence 5.47011'3014., a dista nce or 075.00 fee t to the S. E. corner of Lot 17, Bl ocl: 3 o f sa i d recorded pl at o r Ridcaeiiiont Csta tes , -thence a1 oncJ Llie bouiiciai-y o F sa7 cl p1 at the fol 1 ovii ng tk•fo (Z) courses; l. h1.06039'42"C., a distance of 785.79 feEt, 2. N.44057'17"E., adistance of 79.83 feet to the S.E. corner of Lot 24, B1ock 2 of said plat and point of beginniny of this description Situate in t'ie C:ounty of Spokane, ^tate o'. T•'no-'-ir-ton. Transamerica Transamerica Title Insurance Company PE-165~ T~tle Insurance Serv~ces North 720 Argonne Road 7g Spokane, Washington 99206 E C E ~ (509) 922-2222 R I V E aUG 3 01977 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY : CERTIFICATE TQ PLAT PLANNING DEPARTMENT ° Order No.: 83593-M Certificate for Filing Proposed , Plat of RIDGEMONT ESTATES N0. 2 Spokane County Planning Commission . N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, tidashington Gentlemen: In the matter of the nlat submitted for your approval, this Comnany has examined the records of the County Auditor and Countv Clerk of Spokane County, 14ashington, and the records of the Clerk of the United , States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination , hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to-wit: As hereinafter set forth; VESTED IN: ' ► ALFONS B. RENZ and EVA RENZ, husband and wife ~ EXCEPTIONS: " , l. la/o excise tax, if unpaid. 2. General taxes for the last half of 1977 in the amount of $92.60 (Parcel No. 25541-9001) Covers this and other pronerty General taxes for the last half of 1977 in the amount of $840.62 (Parcel No. 25545-9041) Covers this and other property 3. EASENIENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF: Grantee: The Washington jrlater Power Company, a corporation Purpose: Electrical distribution line with right to place 3 poles and 1 anchor on said property ` Location: See copy attached. , Dated: June 23, 1945 Recorded: July 3, 1945 at 1:42 P. M. Recording No.: 658472A (copy attached) (continued) A ~ Order No. 83593-M August 23, 1977 4. P.ight, title or interest of Tupper Inc., a1Jashington corporation as disclosed by applieation for title insurance. Records exatnined to Au;o-ust 23, 1977 at 8:00 A. P'I. TRANSAI"D?RICA TITLr INSUP,ANCF COPTANY y : cc: Inland Pacific Engineering cc: Tupper Inc. Realtors kk . . Order No. 83593-M Description August 23, 1977 DESCRIPTION: A portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.A1., being more partibularly described as follows: Beginning at the S.E. corner of Lot 24, Block 2 of Ridgemont Estates as per p1 at tfiereof ►-ecorded i n Qook 12 of pl ats, page 36 i n the Spokane County ` Auditor's OFfice; thence along the boundary of said plat the following three ~ (3) courses; 1. N. 03°UO' 22"14. , a di stance of 599.90 feet; 2. S.86059' 38"W. , a distance of 133.07 feet; 3. N.4103344"W., a dist;ance of 478.46 feet; thence hJ. 39°26' 16"E. , a di stance of 597.23 feet; therice 56°26' 16"E. , a distance of 254.12 feet; thence N.56011'51"E., a distance of 59.94 feet; thence S. 56016'59"E., a distance of 195.09 feet; thence N.45053'35"E., a di s i.ance of 477.84 feet to the N. 1/16 corner af the N. E. 1/4 of said Section 25; thEnce S.89016'42"E. along the north line of the N.E. 1/4 of the N.E. 1/4 of said Section 25, a distance of 585.25 feet; thence S.33001'22"W., a CI1St1ilCE 698.46 feet; tlience S.12022'0114., a distance of 558.86 feet; thence S.13013'42"W., a distance of 291.94 feet; thEnce S.64058'44"W., a distance of 269.49 feet; tfience S.07056'30"W., a distance of 656.97 feet; tlience S.47011'30"W., a distance o f 675.00 feet to the S. E. corner of Lot 17, (31 ock 3 of said recorded pl at o f Ri dgeinont Estates • thEnce al ong tI-ie boundary of sa i d pl at the fol 1 o«i ng , two (2) coui-ses; 1. Pl.0663942"E., a distance of 785.79 feet; 2. N.44057'17"E., a distance of 79.83 feet to the S.E. corner of Lot 24, alock 2 of said plat and point of beginniny of this description Situate in the County of Spol.ane, `Jtafie 0 ~ T•',-?3 ir~-to r. ` ~ • i ' lh#%tJSAMFFII;A TiTIE 1r6UkANt.F t'UMPANY ~ W 848 SPRAGUE AVENUE ~ + SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99 I ' 201 N ~ ~ I w -E ~ s ~ ~ ihrt riM is madr sf7i,i; for Ih-purpo,e ol aSSrShng . in lociting Said prernises and Ihe csmpany assumes no " liability for variations, if any, in dimertsions and I laotion ascertamed by actwl wrvey. ~ • - - - ~ u r~_` i ( ~ / 9 `'b , . i . ~ i S ~ e, OW3 N ~-5 Vt/. • _ . ~ - - - . - - - . ' ~ - ~ ~ ~ . _ o - i - \J ~ o . . ~ ~ . . ~~n 1 y L► .n , i ~ , A ;a r~~rr - ~ • `r /1 7 ly ' ' / ~ • ~ J~7 ~ ~ • ~ , STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND RIGHT--OF-TRAY AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between Alfons B. Renz and Hilda E. Renz, husband and wife, residing at South 2009 Sullivan Road, Veradale, Washington 99037, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantors," and Spokane County, a municipal corporation of the State of UJashington, having offices for the transaction of business at West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington 99201, hereinafter referred to as the "Grantee," jointly, along with the Grantors hereinafter referred to as the "Parties." The parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: l. The Grantors, husband and wife, in considera- tion of $1.00, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, and other good and valuable consideration, do hereby convey and release to the Grantee, easements and rights-of-way for a storm drainage system over and across lands owhed by the . ~ Grantors and situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, a description of which is attached hereto and designated Exhibit "A". Said storm drainage easement is intended to exclusively benefit the property particularly described in Exhibit "B", attached hereto, hereinafter referred to as the "Developed Property." The purpose of said drainage easement is to provide an area for flowage and storage of storm water run-off originating on or flow- ing through said developed property. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, it is understood by the parties that this drainage easement shall not preclude or prevent the natural flow of water onto, over or across the land described in Exhibit "A" from properties other than those described in Exhibit "B". U a , ' ~ ` 1 tl. ~ 41 ! ~ 1 t • i' {t~.ri ~t t ~ i, I LPF~ Y i 1t F ' r ' . ~ , !r :1~ . ~ ♦ r ~ ' ^T ~ ~ F : t ` ' , x . 1~~' ~kf hAi~{,' y , . ~ ~ . a K. ej . . - _ . . .a . ♦ n < r . i i . .i . L' r i ..J .«o .~...!'-14L t 1 • ~ , \J 1 2. All construction, rnaintenance and repairs of said storm draining system shall be the sole respQnsibilty of the Grantors and shall be in conformance with the storm drainage plan as approved by the Grantee. The Grantee has no right to enter upon the land described in Exhibit "A" except as provided for in paragraph 4, and except with the prior consent of the Grantors. 3. The Grantee shall have the right to inspect such storm drainage system and to determine and require con- formance with the storm drainage plan as approved by the Grantee. 4. The Grantors hereby release the Grantee from any and all claims, actions, and damages of every kind and nature whatsoever including inverse condemnation accruing to the Grantor arising out of or in any way incident to or attributable to the failure of said storm drainage system. The parties recognize and acknowledge that the storm drainage system has been designed to accommodate a storm of ten year frequency. To the extent that the storm drainage system fails as a result of a water flow or flood in excess of the ten year frequency, the Grantors waive any and all claims, actions and damages which they may have against Spokane County as a result of injury or damage to themselves or any of their real and personal property. 5. The Grantors agree to furnish the Grantee prior to the execution of this agreement their abstract of title showing marketable title on the date of this agreement. 6. The grants of the easement and the rights-of- way as well as the indemnity agreement shall run with-the lands and shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, their heirs, successors or assigns. -2- . , , . , , • . . y• +^JV' 1,^hl''' t.Y~l , '~~i. ' . . ' " . t _ ? ~ _ M..y., rc. a r.. «.s a t a '4 .as~dY..'.1a►.~W`1 e" ` w ^ . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto liave executed thi s agreement on the 9th day of February , 1978. GR.ANTORS ` r ~ r l GRANTEE SPOKANE COUNTY, a municipal cor- poration of the State of Washington Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk of the Board By Deputy Clerk STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) On this day personally appeared before me ALFONS B. RENZ and HILDA E. RENZ, to me known to be the individuals des- cribed in and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledge that they signed the same as theiK free and voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein caentioned. ~I EN under my hand and official seal this ~ ~ day-of 1978. - - No r Pt~bli ifi an r the State of Washington, resid g at Spokane -3- . . . . ` t t~ I ti ' e , ~ ~ 1 t , •f . . ' , t~ A. ~ ~ 'a( ~ Y~sY~ 1~ I ' ! ~ p-• . y f ~ 9, ^ . i'~ .tr r . 'I ' . . : ~ a , EXHIBIT "A" ' Description (prainage retention pond site) That portion of the NE4 NW4 and the N104 NE',; of Szction 25, T.25N., R.44E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point that is S.390 16'42"E., a distance of 626.85 feet from the N,',- corner of Section 25, said point being common to the north boundary pf Section 25 and the west boundary of Leo N. Cashatt and others,'as ' established by a survey performed by Adams Engineering in 1976; thence along saad Cashatt west boundary, the followiny two (g) co urses; 1) S.30 08'12"E., a distagce of 152.25 feet; 2) S.50 22'25"E., a distance of 28.00 feet; thence S.52 30'00"W., a distance o1` 135, 07 feet; thence 5.30 22'04"E., a distance oof 119.42 feet; thence S.5626'16''W., a d9stance of 48.06 feet; thence N.30 22'00"W., a distance of 11§.74 feet; thence S.52 38'00"W., a distance 5 307.71 feet; thence S.50 22'00'yE., a distance of 1;1.82 feet; thence S.39 26`16"W., a distance of 48.00 feet ;ther►ce N.50 22'00"W., a distance og 161.19 feet; thence S.45 39'33"W., a distancQ of 339.84 feet; thence S.50 33'44"E., a distance of P9.11 feet; thenGe • $.39 26'16"W,, a distance oA 40.00 feet; thence N.50 33'44"W., a distence of 283.47 feet; thence S. 46 ►39' 33"W. , a distance of 88.90 feet; thencei.• • S.16 35'04"W., a distance 5 144.40 feet; thence S.07 35'00"W., e distancg , pf 295.00 feet;,thence S.59 05'00"W., a distance of b44~00~~fegt; thence N.39 38 14 W., a distance og 57.50 feet; thence N.21 52 00 E., a d~~taqce of 290.00 feet; thence N.85 21'57"W., a distance of 291.12 feet; thgnGo • U.49 09' 34"E. , a di stance of 922.00 feet; thence N.62 14' S9"E.', d distanGe of 551.95 feet to the point of beginninq. Conta i ni ng 8.86 ± acres. ' , . , . , ~ /,EXHIBIT ~1ENDED CERTIk'ICATE TO PL.AT Order No. 83593-M Description "B" Augus t 2 3, 1977 , - . 1 PESCRIPTION: , • • A portion of the NorLheast quarCcr of Scctioii 25, 1'ownshiP 25 North; ftange 44 E.ja.M,, being'more partibularly described as follows : P)cqinnii7g ai, tllc :i.f.. coriicr of Lot 21, Illock of (licJqemont Est(ites as per N1 tit tf,ereof i-ecorded i n f3ook 12 of pl a ts , page36 i n the Spokane County Audi tor's Office; thence alorig the boiinci(iry of s(iicl plat the follovring three (3) Cqurses; l. fJ.03000122"lJ., a clistance of 599.90 feet; 2. S.Q6°5910 "W., a clistance of 133.07 feet; 3. N.41033'44"W., a distaiir:e of 478.46 fpet;' thence M. 39°26' 1 f1. ,a di stance of 597.23 feet; tlielice 1`1. 5G°26' 16"C. di Stance of (254.12 feet; thence N. 5G°11 '51"C. , a cJi 5 Cance of 59.94 'fo-et; thence S. 5601 G' 59"E. , a(Ji s Cance of 195. 09 fceL; t i1Crice NA5053' :i5"I:. , a disl.ance of 477.84 feet to t17e Pl. 1/16 corner of iiin N.L. 1/4 of said Section 25; thence 5.89016'42"L". aloriq tlie norLh liiie of the PJ.E. 1/4 of t,iie N.E. 1/4 of sai d Sec tion 25, a di s taiice of 585.25 feet; thence S. 33°Ol ' 2?_"W. , a di stance, 698.46 feet; thcnce S.12022'01"W.9 a clisLance of 558.86 feet; tiie+ice S.13013'4211W., a ciistaricc of 291.94 feet; t,hcnce S.005,11iq"W., a ciistance of 269.49 feet; t,lience S. 070!;C,' 3O"W. ,~i cl is Iance of 656. 97 feet ; thc:nc.c S.4701 1' 30"I4. , a distarice of 075.00 fee( I.o t.he S.E. cor•ner of Lot 17, 131ock 3 of said recurded li1 (it o f Ili dgcmont Cs tates - i.hcnce a1 ong l he botinda ry o f sai cl pl at the fol 1 mqi ng tti,10 (2) courses; l. 1,1.06639'42"C., a disi.a nce of 785.79 feet; 2. PJ.44°57'17"E., a cJistance of 19.83 fcrl to t1ic S.E. corncr of Lut 24, 131ock 2 of said plat and point of beginniny of tllis description Situate in the C:ounty of 5pol:aize, `'tate ol • ` H ~J•fY + L6.h'a.?.•s . 1~ l~1t31 .._e 4i.. . + rc Page 2 PE-1163-77 Meadows End ZE-205-77 Gunning Builders- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area ' PE-981-75 Southern's Mobile Park ZE-7-75 W.F. Touthern, Jr. - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area ~ PE-1052A-76 Wallace Second Addition ZE-131-76 Redlin- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area PE-1053-76 Guthrie's Valley View 8th Addition ZE-132-76 Dahlquist-Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area ~ PE-1059- 76 Ri dgemont Es tates No. 2 ZE-144-76 Tupper Realty Co. Inc. - Mains and hydrants need to be i ns ta 11 ed i n th i s a rea PE-892-73 Ponderosa Acres 8th Addi tion ZE-28-73 Tupper Realty Co. Inc. - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. , . , , ~Al Cook Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn , R 6 ECE IV E JAN 13 19'0 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANMING DEPARTMENT . 1-7 4• ~ ~ FFNIifl 7m Yi (A I APPLICATION PROCESS: Application . . . . . . . . . . . . . f a r , . Payment and Receipt . . . . . . . . . Legal Description . . . . . . . . . . , Five (5) P1at Maps . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ Two (2) Parcel Maps . . . . . . . . . Assessor' s Map • • • • • • • WOOO000, - • • • ✓ Health District - Memo • - • • • • • F- t Water District - Letter . . . . . . . r Cou Department . . . . . . ~.ty IItility r ~ Environmental Checklist . . . . . . . ~ 1 REVIEW PROCESS: Deliver Preliminary Plats To: Engineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Qtilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Health District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f~ IncorForated Cities, with deadline letter State Higbway, with c3eadline letter Check Lega1 Description . . . . . . . Zoning Determination . . . . . . . . P/PO' Ordinance Gompliance . . . . . . . . 6001, Old Plan Review . . . . . . . . . . . 40~ Road Alignment & Stub Street . . . . 10000" ~ Ownerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . SloPe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 1001, Lot SizeE . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exi.sting Land Use Fla.n . • . • • • • ~ Check Comprehensive Plan . . . . . . Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Engineers' Memo . . . . . . . . . . . WOOOO ~ Fire Distri-ct Memo . . . . . . . . . Recommendations . . . . . . . , , . Environmental Checklist Review . . . ~ Threshold Determination . . . . . . . Agenda Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proof Read Agenda Page . . . . . . . ~ Post Notice of Public gearing ~ ~ SFECIAL RYAIIIRIlM'F.NTS : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i ~ r" ~ h: "x ' - 0 / (jI/ 1\ tyyr lf~\OJ`~Jl T ~ 691 NOF:' r zZ V~ HAfDAJ, W£4` 99:33/ October 3, 1977 Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 RE: RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 2 Dear Sir: This letter is to verify that the easements as shown on the final plat are acceptable to the Vera Water and Power ' District. Sincerely, ~ ~ . ~ . - _ - - ~ William J. Jo '~b Assistant Manager db #132 #950.77 cc: Pat Moore, IPEC Engineers R ECE I VE OCT 5 1977 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANMING DEPARTMENT ~ - 'aLr , PE-1 059-76 and ZE-144-76 In the matter of a hearing on the application of Tupper Realty, Inc. East 12929 Sprague, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Ridgemont Estates No. 2. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Single Family Residential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats, of such property. The property being platted is described as follows: That portion of the NE 14 of Section 25, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. lying NEly and.Ely of and adjacent to Ridgemont Estates, being bounded generally on the east by-the 2300 foot elevation contour line, being bounded generally on the west by the 2,075 foot elevation contour line, and being bounded on the north by the north line of said NE 34, Spokane County, Washington. (Between 16th and 24th Avenues, approximately 2800 feet east of Sull2van Road) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF VITASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) , betng first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a cttizen of the United States of Amertca, and a resldent of the State of Wa sh tngton over the age of 18 years . That on the day of , 19 , I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated heretn by reference NOT`ICE OF PUBI:IC HEARING in a consplcuous manner at each of the following locations, to-wlt: 1. , 2. . 3. DATED THIS DAY OF , 19 • S tgned , Subscribed and Svvorn to before me thls day of 119 Nofiary Publtc In and for the State of Washington, reslding at Spokane, WA / i ~ - ~ , ~QD41 l L V r_ L~-1 ♦ hV V f { J. I i~ . ♦ J'. i~ November 12, 1976 Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 RE: Ridgemont Estates No. 2 Dear Sir: This letter is to verify that the Vera Water & Power District can supply power and water to the above subdivision providing the developer complies with the District's policies, rules and regulations. Sincerely, 2bib Wi lliam J. liera Assistant Manager db )f 4~~4t ~+..AN{VING COWI~!~~ LAND SURVEYORS, P.S. E 2608 SPRAGUE AVENUE SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99202 (509) 534-3475 LEGAL DESCRIPTION FO R PRELIMIN ARY PLAT O F RIDGEMONT ESTATES NO. 2(approximate description to be used only for preliminary plat purposes) That portion of the NE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington lying northeasterly and easterly of and adjacent to Ridge- mont Estates, being bounded generally on the ea---t by the 2300 foot e levation contour line, be ing bounded ge nerally on the west by the 2075 foot elevation contour line, and being bounded on the north by the north line of said NE 1/4. 1 B. Cl ~ApJE 0 ~ 12 90 ~t Daniel B. C lark, L. S. 12904 Cy'~ ~'A! t pND Re CIE IVEC) NQV1J M a0A~f5~~ PLANNING ~ ~ ~ ~ Y'~~► ~r~~ ~ereb~► rrvti~i+~d, tha~ on ~,o~ ot th „ ~ h~'UI" c~f ~ai~ dt~~► i~ ~~vn~er~n~~ R~t~~ Nl+~llc~n Av~enve Err~ ~~an~e, ~p~oka~~ ~~r~nt~ ~vurt H~u~~ A~r~e~, 5~+~~C~n~, '~'~shin~t~r~, T~~ ~~~~~#I~E ~~l~~T'~ ~~A~~i~VG ~~3~IN1~~~ ~~~I~ w~il~ ~+~ndu~~t a p~ublic hec~~ing t~ s~ ~r~ ~c~, ~ r~ ~r~., ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a~ ~ ~ 1~'~ ~ ~~~~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~iRl~#■ ~~i ~ . . +~~~e~'~~~l~i'~~'„~~ ~'~n+~~~~ +d~e~~ripfi~n a# ar~ea: _ ~ !~r ~i~~l. ~ ~~~ll ~ ~D► ~ ~ ~ a~ ~ ~ t~l1~ ~ ~o~# ~l~i~~~ ~N~` ~►iIM} ~ ~t M~ '~r! ~1~! ~ ~11~' 4L ~"M q~!~1 b~' ~ ~ ~ 0! ~►d ~i ~1r "I~~h r~ ~ ~~f ~~3 ~ #M~ sM1 0! i~~ ~~~t ~LlRTH~~ ~ETAII~ ~~rr~t~ct t~e ~~~~C~ane C~unt~ Pl~~tnin~ ~~mmi~si~vr~, ~'u~b~~ic IV~~rk~ Bui~~ir~g, N. 8~~ ,l+~ff~r- sc~~n ~tr~~t, ~p~l~~r~e, ~Ala~hrn~t~n. Qiret~or of Plan~ing Sp~►ka~• C4u~~r Pl~anning Cor~mis~ion ~DRM 6d6 fLNG. tdMl~: ~•6a I