PE-1023-76
{R
T.
T'Alo
A G/'P. 7o SIIVG1-E Fxvi FS 6C- l mp 7wo -FAN1 ES
.
PLANNIIJG COMiV[ISSION
Y414D
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ACTION
DATE ACTION TAKEN RECORD OF ACTION
~ JU L Y 1976 1J N`f /~-A IV COI-111 / l 1 NUTE~
f ~
a JuL--r ~ -SE-r DA7~ Fvg Q PPEat. o ~ C4. GM~2 ,691NG-
~ ~
A o c, L9 7~ APP5 A 1- //ff f4 R/V G
~
' b
No. 77 315 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
P£-1023A-76
IN TH£ iVIATTER OF RECONSIDERING THE )
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION PRELIMINARY )
APPROVAL; AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION )
UPGRADING ON PE 1023A-76, CURRY TWO ) RESOLUTION
ADDITION (REVISED), ZE-75-76, AGRICUL- )
TUREIL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(R-1) )
-WHEREAS, pursuant to Pesolution #76-1195, the Board of County Commissioners
did approve the preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading, subject
to conditions contained therein; and
WHEREAS, the Board was desirous of reconsidering the threshold determination
and approval of said plat and zone change; and
WHEREAS , the Board did hold a public hearing on March 10, 1977 to consider
the above and did formally withdraw their approval of said plat and retained juris-
diction in the matter, pending additional consideration of the environmental assess-
ment; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing those in favor and those in opposition were given the
opportunity to provide information relative to the above, and
WHEREA.S, the Board has considered the testimony of said hearing and any
additional studie s derived from oiher departmerts or agencies
NOW,' THEREFORE, BE IT FORMALLY RESOLVED that the Board of County
Commissioners, as responsible official, does hereby order that a proposed Declara- -
tion of Non-Significance be signed and that the Chairman of the Board is hereby
authorized to sign a Final Delcaration of Non-Significance upon compliance with .
the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners does uphold
their decision to approve said preliminary plat and zone classification upgrade
pursuant to Resolution #76-1195 and the conditions contained therein.
` BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
HARRY M. LaRNED
RAI .
ATTEST:
VERNO N W. O HLAND
Clerk e Board
By: Deputy v
A.PPLICATICK PROCE33:
Appl i c ation . . . . . . . . . . .
F.hvirormental Gheokliat. . . . . . .
Five (5) Plat Mapa . . . . . . . .
ZtWo (2) Parcel Mape . . . . . . . .
~ Legsl Deacription. . . . . . . . . " .
Health Dietriet . . . . . . . . .
Water Diatrict. . . . . . . . . .
Payment an+d Receipt . . . . . . . .
County Utilitq Department . . . . . .
. . . . .
. . . . . ~
. . . . .
REVIEW PROCESS:
Deliver PrelinninarY Plats Zb :
Engineers. . . . .
IItilities. . . . .
Health Diatrict. . .
Ineorporated Citiea .
State Highwaye . . . .
Zoning Deterniination. . .
Old Plan Review . . . .
Lot Sizes . . . . . .
Road Alligment & Stub Street
SECRETARIAL PROCESS: Ownershipa . . . . . .
slope. . . . . . . .
~ Drainage. . . . . . .
Check Legal. . . . . . . . ~ Fire District Meaa . . . ~
Assign Zone Change Number Qrdinanoe Compliance.
Affedavid of Posting. Exieting L,and Uee Plan
Printer . . . . . . . . . Environraental Checkliat Review tProperty Owner Notitication Threahold Determination. .
~
Agendd Page. . . . . . . . Agendn. MapB. . . . . .
Legal Notice . . . . . . . Poating Notice. . . . .
. : . . . . .
. . . . . . .
SPEcui, xEq S :
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
~
A T1COR COMPANY . , Pioneer National Title Insurance Company
WEST 521 FIRST AVENUE • SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99210 • TELEPHONE (509) 838•5281
CHARLES U. ANDERSON
VIGE PRESIDENT AND COUN7Y MANAOER
P.EPOIZT FOR PLAT CERT I F I CATE
REFER T0: C-114087
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
COURT HQUSE CC: CLARENCE SIMPSON
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON CC: GORDON CURRY REAL ESTATE
THIS IS A REPORT Fc)R PLAT CERTIFICATE AS OF JUNE 7, 1977
AT 8:00 A.M., COVERING THE FOLLObIING PROPERTY:
THE NORTH 539.3 FEET OF THE NORTN 1650.2 FEET OF TNAT PORTION OF THE
SOUTHVJEST QUARTER OF SEc:T I ON 34, T0WNSH I P 26 NORTH, RANGE 44, EAST,
W, M, , I N S POKANE C OUNTY , WASH I NGTON,
LYtNr EAST OF A LINE ORAWN FROM A POINT IN THE NORTH LiNE OF SAiD
SOl1TFfvJEST QUARTER, 1,578.6 FFET EAST OF THE rJORTHWFST CORPJER THEREOF TO
A POINT IN THE SOUTH LIIJE OF SAID SUBDIVISION 1,579,2 FEET EAST OF
THE SOUTh1qEST CORNER TH(:REOF; _
EXCEPT THE SOUTH 179,766 FEET; AND
EXCEPT MC DONALD ROAD,
R.ECORD T I TLE I S VE STED I N GORDON W. CURR,Y ANO 6ETTY L. CURRY,
HI~ WIFE,
SUE3JECT T0:
1. DELINQUENT GFNERAL AND VIFED TAXES FOR 1977 IN THE RESPECTIVE SUMS
OF $ 103 . 08 AND 4:3 , PLUS I NTERE ST ,
(ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. 3L+643-9063) .
2. LIEN OF REAL F~TAT(: EXC(SF SALES TAX UPON ANY SALE OF SAID
PREMISES, IF UNPAI!).
3. I R,P, I GAT I ON ASSESSM(:NT OF $ 54 , 00, RY TRENTGJ000 I RR I GAT I ON D I STR I CT
N0. 3, FOR 1977, TfiE FIRST HALF BECAME DELINOUENT MAY 31ST. THE
LAST HALF WI LL BE ()EL i NQUENT DECEMBER 1 ST, I F UNPA I D.
NQTE: THERE (S A$I.00 DELINQUENCY CHARGE BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY
TREASURER. .
CONTINUED
r ~
• C- 1 14087
. PAGE 2
PLAT CERT I F I CATF
4, FOR FASFMF_NTS, RESTRICT IOPIS A.PID.OTHER EXCEPT IONS, SEE SCHEDULE
"8- 1" ATTACFIED.
NOTES:
~ . SA I 0 PRFM I SE S L I F bl 1 THI N THE BOUNDAR I F S OF TRENTVlOOD I RR I GAT ! ON
DISTRICT N0. 3, ANn ARE SUQ.IECT TO ASSESSMENT BY SAID DISTRICT.
FOR I NFOP,ViAT I ON C014TACT:
ELLEN .10HNSON
E AST 14115 TRE NT Rt)AD
SPOKANE, VlASH I NGTOIJ 992 16
926-7733
THIS RE?ORT SHALL IiAUE NO FORCE OR EFFECT EXCEPT AS A Bl1SIS FOR
THE CERTIFICATE APPLIED FOR.
PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURAPJCE COMPANY
SPOKANE COUNTY OFFICE
AUTHORIZF_D NATORY
HB/TO
ACPEAGE 34-26-I+[t
a ~
• SCHEDULF "B-- 1" 1. AN EASFMENT pESERVI:p i N A Of:ED FROh1 JOHN W. BLACK, ET AL, TO
AVERY E. DAV I DSON, QATED OCTOBER 1915. RECORDED I N VOLUME 340 OF
DEEDS, PAGE 7, WHI(;M DFED IS MADE "SUBJE:CT TO THE RIGHT OF EACH
OF THE GRAN1'0RS HCrZEI N, AND TO ALL PE:RSONS VlHO SNALL AT ANY T IME
HEREAFTER OWN ANY 1'ORT I ON OF THE SOUTMIE ST QUARTER OF SA I D
SECT I ON 34, TO A R I GHT OF WAY 16 FEET I N WI DTH EAST AND WE ST THROUGN
THE CENTEF? OF SA i D SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SA I D SECT I ON 34, EQUALLY
D I STANT FROM THE Nt)RTfi AND SOUTM L I NE THEREQF; ALSO SUBJECT TO
THE R( GNT OF FACH UF Tf-IE GRANTORS HERE I N APJD OF ANY PERSON
NEREAFTER 0'11NI NG AIIY PORT ION OF SAi D EAST F-IALF OF THE NORTHEl1ST
QtIARTER OF SECT I ON 33, SA I D TOti~JNSN I P AND RANGE, TO TRAVEL OVER
SA ! D LAND FR0t1 I TS NORTH TQ I TS SOUTII L I NF THROUGH THE SWALE
OR GULCH WH I CH RUNS I N A rJORTHERLY AND SOUTHERLY D I RECT I ON
AND THR.QUGN WH I CH AT PRE SENT TNERE I S A ROADuIAY."
2. RESERVATtONS CONTAINED IN DEED FROM TRENTVJ00D IRRIGATION DISTRICT
NO. 3, AS FQLLOWS :
"THE DI STR I CT P.ESEIZVES ALL EX I ST I NG R I GHTS OF WAY AND EASEMENTS
OVER AND .4CROSS SAID PREMISES, AND ALSO THE RIGHT AT ANY AND
ALL TIMES TO GO UPON SAID PREMISES, OR pNY PART THEREOF, FOR
THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCT I NG, OPERAT I NG l1ND PlA I NTA I N I PJG THE
CANALS, DI TCHFS, Fl_UrIES AND PI PC L I NES wHICIi SNALL BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTOR.S OF SAID DISTRICT BE DEEMED NECESSARY IN
THE OPERATION OF ITS IRRIGATION SYSTEM,"
~
PC- ~~6 A
G~0}~i1 W. ~
{.Yiili i
I AND CQ.
2F.&2SGAS '
'i .HO LAND I
j ~E4ELGPfiAS .
EAST 9209 TRENT AYENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) WA 8-0600
Auqust 12, 1977
Spokane County Planning Commission
Spokane, Washington
As of taday we would like to withdraw our application
for the Development Gurry Two. We would like to thank
you for your cooperation, effort and tYme in working with
u s on this Pl at.
~
✓ ~9~~~
Gordon W. G'urry
R E C E I V E
AUG121977
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT RESIDENTIAL 0 COMMERCIAL • ACREAGES • LAND DEVELOPMENT
. t , -
/ D
TT1-~ ~
~
- CURRY TWO SUEDIVISION t~
zE-75-?6
( From Agricultural to Single Family Zone )
Many of the socia.l, enviror.menta.l and economic issues have
already been raised. This brief synopsis is intended to help
validate getitioners' concerns by citing data which is acceptable
to planners, environmentalists and policy-makers alike. Documents
mentioned in footnotes are available through the U. S. Government
Printing Office. There is a lack of empirical data on the Spokane
Valley itself. The 208/Aquifer Study is underway. In the absence
of a Spokane County Comprehensive Plan wherein environmental impacts
have been considered, it is recommended that a moratorium be placed
on the proposed project until the 208 Study is completed.
Fetitioners are concerned that their lifestyle is being threatened.
The County Planning Commission defines most of the immediate area
as agricultural. Essentially, a.griculturally productive land
(beef, vegetables) located neas a city in an era of possible energy
shortage is being exchanged for low density sprawl without the
existing residents' consent. Ultimately their lifestyles and
vocational choices are impaired. And low density sprawl (as defined
by the Real Estate Research Corporation) costs government far more
to initiate and maintain than various other forms of growth. Costs
for roads and utilities are about 55 percent higher in low density sprawl than in high density community.i Eventually, sprawl will
cost the citizens of Spokane County more for police and fire protec-
tion, roads, energy and other essential services than property tzx
revenues can maintain. In the last analysis, all costs of develop-
ment--both capital and operating--are paid by citizens in the form of higher prices for purchases and rentals, higher user and service
fees, higher taxes, and higher special assessments.2 .
,
1. Executive Summaryt The Costs of Sprawl `
2. Page 200, Detailed Cost Anal,ysis, The Costs of Sprawl
~ .
r - • -
. h'ith land use a.ll facets are inter-related. To change one component
is to upset an equalibrium. It is to begin a series of events. "At
• some critical point in policy-making the threads must be drawn together
. and the primacy established of turning settlements into humane and
genuine communities."3 As Jerry Neal stated in a memo to the Board of
County Commissioners on January 19, 1977, the "views and interests of
all the residents of the county" must be considered when deciding
zoning and platting matters. In fact, there may be more social dis-
allocation from six 8 to 9 acre developments than from one 50 acre .
developinent, although impact statements are not required for the smaller,
more costly, leapfrog patterns. It is a question of scale and perspec-
tive. krhat are the implications of this method of planning? What
about the next 8 acres?
The Spokane County Environmental Checklist represents a starting point.
The issue can be stated simply. "Has the Environmental Checklist bcen
adequately considered in the proposed Curry Two plat?" Petitioners
believe not. Based on the checklist filed by the proponent and received
by the 5pokane County Flanning Commission on September 15, 1976, over
15 points of contention emerge. That is to say, if the petitioners
were to fill out their own Environmental Checklist, the writer, based
upon only 48 hours involvement, thinks that over 15 questions would be
answered substantially at odds with the proponents• Checklist. Some of
those concerns deserve brief inention here.
Environmental Checklist .Part I; Question 6. The proposed plat is not an "ideal" surrounding
for suburban living. Leapfrog development carries extremely high
costs. Furthermore, data indicates no consumer preference for low
density sprawl develoged in leapfrog patte rns.4 Avoiding it, however,
saves commuter time and peripheral open space--both social gains.
3. Page 9, Statement of the Vancouver S,ymposium at Habitat.
4. Pa.ges 16-17, The Grow-`,,h Shapers : Land Use Impacts of
Infrastructure Investments
Part I; Qs,zestion 10. Apparently future developimen-ts are beir.g planned. ,
The inclusion of a North/South road within the approved design--having
temporar.y cul-de-sacs--indicates a rea.r3.iness to allow development -
alongside the proposed plat.
Pa.rt I; Question 11. Plans a.nd events will affect both the property
covered by the proposal and surrounding properties. "On the fringe of
metropolitan areas, the first wave of population increase is usually
the most significant socially. If new population is brought into a
predominatly agricultural arEa.... the new population will tend to work
at occupations different from those of present residents; they will
probably have a diiferent income status, a differer.t political outlook, and per:zaps different ethnic backgrounds. Over the years, this lea,ds
to a realignment of the co,ntunity°s political and economic system, and
the original structure is exchanged for a nEw one."5
Cost-wise, if new residents a.re al"fluent, they may demand ir.creased
services-with expenses sharcd by existing residents. If the proposEd
development attracts a"poverty population"--as in some 235 housing--
- existing residents must share, along with other taxpayers, the main-
tenance costs for the newcomers. Either way, plans by existing
residents to continue their present lifestyle in light of increased
costs can reduce their produc'uion capital, a,dversely affecting their
ability to use the land a.griculturally. To cope with inereased costs t
lifestyles will change. As residents become less self-sufficient
they may either leave the arEa, seek paychecks in the city, or sell
the land into low density sprawl. This process takes time, and can be
compared to "blockbusting" in thE cities. The proposed plat and a,ujacent
lands are affected 1) by the development itself, 2) by the inevitable
chain of events it may trigger.
Part II; Question 2. Air quality wi1-I be impaired. Pa.rticulate natter
will increase.6 In fact, lew der.sitf sprawl produces 55 percent more
air pollution than high density development.?
5. Preface, The Land Use Im~-3cts of Inirastrl1ctu.re InveStments
o. Spokane Coun-ty Plannir.g Commiss:ion
7. Pa,.ge 4f Executive Summz,..:tyt The Co,;•ts of Sprawl
w
~
• y ~
r ~
. v
( •
Part II; Question 3. Central issucs surround water quality. The
proposed site ys above the Ur.derground Aquifer. Indeed, springs near
the area indicate that the Aquife-r is exposed at those points. The
site, at 8.7 acres, will lose 18 to 20 percent to roa.ds and other im-
provements. This leaves slightly under ? acres for actual usea.ge.
k►ith 16 houses proposed, density (as opposed to gross density) is
increased to greater than two houses per acre. "Environmental hazards
from septic tank disposal pose its maior drawback....On...sloges or ,
unde r adverse soil conditions, septic tank disposal threatens the
quayity of groundwater reba..rdless of develop:nent density. Even where
soil and slope conditions are favorable, this form of sewa..ge dis posal •
is not recommended where densities exceed two dwelling units per
'0
acre....
Fa.rt II; Questions 5,6,8,9,10,11 and 12. Local fauna would definitely
be affected. Fetitioners assert that various wild fauna now use adjacent
area. Automobiles pose one noise hazard. j-lhat about trail bikes?
It hapgened in the Spofford Addition. It ca,n, happen in Curry Two.
Sixteen new septic ta.nks and a population increased twofold within the
immediate vicinity would obviously double the risk of hazardous substances
in the form of poss3.ble aquifer pollution. Finally, natural gas ax1d
electricity are apparently planned as energy sourcea for the houses.
Plannzng, combined with increased density, can reduce energy demands up
to 44 percent.9 The proposal is an extravagr.nt use of increasingly
.
scarce resources.
8. Fa.ge 182, Ietailed Cost Analvsis, The Costs of Sprawl
9. Page 5, Executive Sumn:a.r,y. The Costs of Spra•n~l
Data for this synopsis was taken from:
The Costs of Sprawl (Three Volumes) Real Estate Pesearch Corp., 1974
The Growth Shapers ; L,%nd Use Imp~1c 'us of Infrastructure Development
Urba.n Systems Research and Engincerinb, Inc. 1976
Leclaration of the Var.coaver Symposium alt. Habitat, June, 19?6
~
~
•i .
r
r
~ _ .
I?ori?-ld R. HoxnbeCk
- ~-Test 321 Eignth Avenue
Spaka.nc } Washingt on 99204
EDUCA`FIDN: ' B. A. iri Htufia.nities. (Palitical Science, English and, Business Minors. ) .
Grarluate training in Soca.alogy, ~ommurtity DeveZogment, Aami.nistrative.
[h~ganization and P'lanning.
CL?RRENT COdVTRACTS r '
Institute vf the Rockies, 622 Evans, Missaulat Monta.txa
Pro,;ect: Coltimbia River ~~fatck~
NorthT,,~st Reg3ona1 Fauna.ation, P. O. Bvx 5296, Spakane, W~~hington
Prv ject:Northwest Habitat Conf erence.
REL4TED FAS'~ ~XPEF~TENCE:
Washing-ton State Energy Office, South 157 Howardf Spokane, Washington
Prvject: Weatherizat~~n Program
- The Peace Carps., Kabul, Afghanistan
Fxo ject : Food for Woxk/ C airramunity Developmen'u- -Progra~
~OLE, DEFINI"T'ION;
A hametown generalist with international. trav~l and work experi,ence,
with gxaduate training at several uriiver~ities, with sufficient
awaxeness and intelligence to raise t'critical 3.ssues" will introduce
data for the recor€i. His central concern is whether ar not a11 planning
alternatives have been considered vis-a-vis the groTAh vf the Spakane
Metropolitan Area,. - , M. GAFIZITIQI~~~ AFFILIATIOi'%S : .
Mensat .
Nationa]. Institute of CreeUvity, "
Association fox Creative Cnange within Religious and Other Or~~~~tions.
i'
~
=
~ ' t ~r 1!r
~ ~i: ~ ~ , r ~ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~
. p "t i
_ ~'wJ~;_.~,~.
r ~ ~
_ ' .
~
" ..i_
~i~~
.
- ~l
~ a ~
~ ,
~ ,
~
;
~
w
~ ~ ~t i' .
s` ~ ~ s :
?~4 r
_r
J. ,
~ r
. .
,
~
,
~
y ~
- 1~ ~ ~
t.;
~
r~
, ie . ;'~.i~~: .
_ r;~~M' t~. ; .f
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ J s ''t ~ . ~ ~l i
tL ~ ~ ~ ~
~i~ ~ 4
~ `Y~ ~ ~~.~~I
c
y
' .~i~~
~ ~ ~
` v ,lxx 1
G
t . .t
~
4
~
1
~ .
, ~ -
~ ~
.
- ; : 4,
~
i , •
~ ~ • r
~
~
- ~ .7 ? - 3
`y 644*10
.
~
~
r t.~ .
• S PIC REF. #.Pj PE ~ IOZ3a'7(o
.
~
~
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
i r /FINA)
D ECLARAT IOP3 4 F
(Proposed/firal)
'-~~t:~; ~1 ~ ;i :r.
- -
. _ . , . _ . WoN 51I k 1C~
(sig iiificance/nonsigni f icance)
1 . D-scripcion of Proposal: 867 Ac~ ~
Ljsr~ (be_D'SE
pnl~t o~ n~~f11~L ~W ~1~.► ~ ~l ~T,g .
G U?XY -nd,p ~i~ . . .
? , ~ : , : ~ ~ : ~ ~1~~ W . C U ~2 i2.`~
3. G~ ~n:,~•r Pet,=rn: cor 2- Phone:
i ,-)unty Act?nn(s) Requeste:i. QQEL1U1 ~,A~~ Q~? ZQf~f [,~A~11' ~
. -
4. Location oi Proposal: 5~~~ 05 MACC DQKMLQ ZO"
- ~ ~ ~1. N~1~ ~ W ~.►~Lt=. !
5. Lead Aqency: SPUKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
This proposal has been determ ed to have a siqnificant adverse impact on ,
ttle environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43 . 21C .030 (2) (c) ; This
-_i-cfsion was made aftAr review by the County of a completed environmental checklist
cinc1 othor infarrr.a,tom on file with the lead agency.
~ . Rcsponsible Official:
Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration:
(name ) JE (r~ame)
atur . ~ ~ 144%-~ .
(slanature
(t~.tle) title G QV A~ ~
de t . ~ C-L. (d e . . OlA 11~ . oir" da e ~ te ~ Z-7
D?par[ment Reference No.: "7j~p 4 Z~ - 75
r
(See Reverse Side)
~
I
7. For Daclarations of Significance Qnly:
Date of Expected D-aft EIS Availability
(determined by Rosponsible C3fficial)
Date En[ered in "CIS in Preparation Regisker"
(determined by S1:PA Publfc Information C^nter)
To be completed by responsible official:
a. Brief description and listinQ of chose en•Ironmental imp.::cts 1Fo-Aing [o sucii
declaration:
b. E3rief explanatlon of what measures, if jny could be taken by the applicant to pre-
vent or mltigate the environmental impacrt of the proposal to such an extent that
the responsible offlclal could consider << revised proposal wtth a possible re-
sulting declaration of nonslgnlficance:
g, For EMose_d Declarations of Nonsignificanr.e Only:
Date Entered. "Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance
Register" (determined by SEPA Public Information Center)
Date comments [o be received (15 day review perlod)
(determined by SEPA Public Information Center)
9. SEPA Public Information Center:
(For departments of General Government only)
( j Approved as to form
( } Disapproved as to form
Reasons; Signature of SEPA PIC Officer:
Da te:
I
i~
_ . . = ~_y4~.:i>
. . ' j•t'i~i:_L_•~ '
I 7
I-
, it
t1
. • ,
SPONANC COUNTY GOURT HOUSE
STATE of WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
Environmental Checkli st
*oposal
file number
#,vF'
~
SEP
31"'uM"vt tvuu+%, f
PAANNING► COINIMISbiOIV
svk"I"'XI,
SPOHANB COIINTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2274
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
! ♦ r r-- '
. ~
INTRODUCTION: The State Environmental Poli4y Act of 1971, Chapier 43-.21C, RCW
requires all state and local qovernmental agencies to consider environmental
values both for tbeir own actions and when licensing priv8te proposals. The
Act also xequires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly
affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose o£ this checklist is to
help the agencies involved.detezmine whether or not-a proposal is such a major
action.
Please answer the following questions as completely ae you can with the
information presently available to youo Where explanations of your answers
are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to govern-
men±• decision makes, include your explanation in the space provided, or.u$e
additional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports
or studies of which you are aware and which are relev ant to the answers you
provide. Complete answers to these Zuestions now will help all agencies in-
volved witb ynur propogal to undertake'the-required environmental review with-
out unnecessary delay, " . The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to-the
license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval
is sought. Your ar.swerG should include the impacts which,will be caused by
your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until
sometime:in the futurea *This w.ill allow all of the agencies which will be in-
volved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paper-
work Yn the f uture. .
No application shall be process until the checklist has been completed and
returned to the Pl.an Commission, State law requires explanations for everY "Yes"
and "maxbe" ar►swer on the checkli.st and person completing the form may provide
explanations for "no" answersa
NOTE: This is a standar-d form being used by all state and local agencies in the
State of Washington for various typea of praposals. Many of the questions may
not apply to,your proposal~ If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and
c.ontinue on to : the next, question, .
• ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND ~
1. Name of Proponent ef.0 64 rr l 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent : iF -rrP.n 7'
1 - . ~ .
30 'Date CheCklist Submitted A597'6
4. Aqency Requiring Checkliet
- V •
5. Name of proposal, if applicable i,•
, .
. - ,a
e _ ' • ' .
6, Nature arid Brief Description of the Proposal i.including but not limited to
its size, general design eZzments, and other factors that wi11 giv an accuratd
undergtandin of its sco e and nattxr.e~D : P,~ ~q p l .16ti'r0440
. .
-~~-K laa~. q " ~
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well
as the extent of t.he land area affected by any environmental impacts o including
any other information needed to give an a;curate understanding ~f the environ-
mental setting of the proposal) : c3,`/ Le-o~
,
8. Estimated Date for Compietion of the Proposal: Da 7 (2 ,
9. List of a11Permits, L.icEnses or Government Approvals Required for the- r
Propo:,a-l (federal, stalCe and local incYuding rezones):-PJa-f -Sul wvLJbE~4
~ . ~
10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or furthe~ activity re-
lated:to or con~.ervted•with this proposal? If yes, explain:
, .
11. Do you know of any p.Lans by others which may affe t the property covered by
your proposai? If yes, explain:
12. At,tach any other applicatian form that has been completed regarding the pro-
proposal; if none ha5 bee.n. c-ompletedq but is expected to be fileld at some
future date, describe the natur2 0f such application form:
I I , ENVZRONMENTAL IMPACTS '
+ Exp 1 anat i.ons of a11 "yes" and "maybe" anweZ:, are requiredl
Yes Ma~be No
l.) Earths Will the prmposa,l result in: ~ajl Unstab:le earth conditions or in ithanges in
geologic substructures? ~j
(b) Disrupi-io.rs, displacement.s, compacLion or .
overcovering of the soi L? ~
( c)' Change i n t4pography or ground surface relief
features?
(d) The destruc.tion, covering or moaification of
~any unique geologic or physical feat.ures? 2A
I(e) Any increase 'n wind or water erosion of soils,
eirher on ar off t.he site? ~k
(f) Changes. in deposit.ion or erosion of beach sands,
or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion x
° -
. ,
Yes MaYbe No
wriich may modify the channel of a river or stream
or ~the bed of the ocean, or any bay, inlet or lake?
Explanation :
~
(2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of,ambient air
quality? ~
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? ~
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or .
temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally?
- Explanation:
(3)' Water. Will the proposal result in; !a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh ~
waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
. or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood
" waters? ~
.,(d) Change in the amount of surface water'in any,
. .
water body? x
(e) Discharge into surf ace waters, or in any altera-
tion of surface water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbi - '
dity? ~
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? ~ (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either ~
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations ? ~
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
~ ground waters? ~
(i) Reduction in the amount vf water otherwise available for public water supplies?
Explanation: ~
(4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? x
`b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered specfes of flora? ~
" • Yes Maybe No ~ .
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
(d) Reduction in ac eage of any agricultural crop? x
Explanation:4&/ ~,Zt7-7• ~
(5) Fauna. Will the proposal/result in: -
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna) ? ~
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of,)fauna? ~
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
'or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna? ~
(d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ~
Explanation:
(6) Noise. Will the proposal ncrease ex'sting noise levels? 0
Explanation;l.-MD/''G ✓IGlP.-_s • ~~,L O~tJv~~J6-,~ +
0
(7) Liqht and Glare, Will the proposal produce new light or
glare?
.
Explanation: fiLo'm a~Y ~,n ~ '
L-L
f
(8) Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of
the present or rlar{ne3 la:.d uEpe of an ared ~
E xp 1 anat i on : , yyLP_g L, - -P-1 c) V I I (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of nay natural resources? p~ (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? ~
Explanation: bu u S
7 Ula
(10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an '
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited tr oilp pesticides, chemicals or rad'iation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ~
Explanation:
(11) Population. Will the proposal alter the location, dis-
tribution, density, or growth rate of the human popu- lation of an area? ^•Explanation:
a.6
(12) Housincie will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additi nal housing?
Ex lanation : ~ ~irl~ ~ dVl v C 01 6e a
r---
.
. . , • , ' ,
~
o-
Ye5 M~yb$ NO
(13) rTransyortation/Circulatior,, Wili, the proposal result in•
(a) Genaration of additional vehicular movement? ~
(b) Effects an existing parking faciiities, or demarxd ~
f or new parking ?
(c) Impact upon exist,ing transportat~vn sy'sterns?
(d) Altexat.ioras to present patter37s of circulation or ~
, movernent of people and/or goods? ~
%e} Alterativns to waterbor'na, rai1 or air traffic? ~
(f) Incxease in tra~~ic hazards to motor vehic1.es,
bicyclist.s or pedestrians?
Exp lanation:~ rlle---
r
(14) Publ.ic. 5erva.cesa Will the praposal have an effect upon,
or result in aneed ior new or a1tered governmental services
a..n any af the fa I. l.owing a-reas : ~
(a) Fir-e pratectLon?
(b) PO1iXe protecti7rit
(c) Schaol.s'~ ' ~ i
(d) Parks or at.hex° recreational faciliti.e,s?
(e) Maintenan.ce of pubZic facilities, incZudzng roads?
(f) othez" gaverxamental sex'vices? '
Explanation: 77~~
' (15) EnerqZ. Will the progosal, result in; -
(a) Use of substantial arnrruxYts ❑f fuel or energy? ~
(b) Demand upon existing sources r f energy, or requir~ ~
the dev-eZagment. ~ r~e~r sources of er~erg~r?
E xp a nat i o n : ~ ~ ~p J►neS. / we
A! ~~e ~ ync-- x
(16) Utilities,r Will the propasa.L result in a need for new
systems, Qr alterations to the follawinq uzilities :
(a) Pvwer or natural qas? ~ -
(b) Communa.cations systerns? _
(c) water? , , ~
(d) Sewer or 5eptic taa)ks?
(e) 5tarm water drainage?
- (f) Solid waste and disposal? . ~
Explanat,i.on:-Ac. ~octte--.2~
s
. - . . ~ ,
(16) H+.imati HeRlLho YYi11 tFie prVpVs¢~ resh.t~~ in I..lEe cirrta4iVLf of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excZuding .
rnental health)? ~
Explarlation :
~
i
r . _ ` + . .
, • ' Y@S Maybe NO
(18)Aesthetics a Wi11 the praposal resu:1t i.n the obstruction
• af any s,cenic vista or view, open to Ithe public, or will
the proposal result in the creation af an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view? ~
~
Explanatzon:
y...,r. . , ~ ~ -
(19) Recreation G Wil1 the proposal result in an impact upon the qualitgr or quantity of existing recreational opgarturxities? X
E xp 1 anat i an : ~
(20) Archevlflqical/'Historicalo Will the proposal result in 'an
alteration of a sxgni.ficarxt archeologicaI ar histarical
site, struct,ure, ohject or building?
~4
Expianation:. (21) Additional Informata.on.
I I I. 5 IGNPi'IkU RE
I,, the undersigned, state that tv the best of my ;cnowledge t.he above information
is true and carrplete. Yt is understnod that the lead aqency may withdraw any declara-
tion of non-significance that it Might issue in relxarice upon this checklist shauld
there be ariy wi1lfu1 misrepresentation or willful Taek of fu11 disclosure on rny part.
Propanent: -
P,ddr+ess;
PhD]Cle;
. . _ ~
Person completing formd
Phone :
nate:
~ i
3rVf%A114t WOVI Y
- I'LANN~~ ~ISbION
r
' - ;.c_<'• .
. a.ti' r.~~. I ~ ~i.~~ \ 7
. . •4'
, . I _
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
tPUBLIC WORKS BUILDiNG N. 811 JEfFERSON STREET
!f I
• ~ ~ ~ PHONE 458-2274
- SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
' . • , . , , . ' . .
SVOKANE COUfITY COVR7 nOUSE
MEMORANDUM
T O: C fl.
UON14 DISTi2tCT
4/o C-NY1R. }~L=ALT1{ .
F RO M: S pokane County Planning Department -
N. 811 jefferson, Spokane, WA 99201
A tt e nt i on :&h p~ET~},d,i~OS
DATE:
R E F E R E N C E: Attached Proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and Environmental
Checklist for C15RJZI TWO SQbD1U1 $10Q
re -10Z3 A -16
Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be
one of jurisdiction, WAC 197-10-040 (4).
Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your right to review and comment as pro-
vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advise th the proposal was listed
in the SEPA Public Information Center on ,
i
. l
• ' ~ • -t . • I `I , ~ \
w'
]il.'1
yr I~ ~ . , • ' : . .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I,.
rPUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET
~ dLi~ PNONE 458-2274
, ~ .
y SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99201
. . , . . .'L~e;~= `N-•
5°0 KaNE CounTY G0L Ri riou5E LE..AD AGENCY DESIGNATION OF SPOKANE COUNTY
Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department,
a dfvision of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an
e
ACTING AGENCY, i s the LEAIJ AGENCY for the following de scribed proj ect:
_ V TV40-"a01 V 1 S 1 t*&J
. PE - 10?.d3jA -7(o
The following i.s explanation for this determination:
vVA C. O-ZZO
Determination for Spokane County By: Name: bo 6 $
Title: Pt-PoAN Ev,~,.
Date: 7/17
.
I ~
. - - •-;::'f`. -~`rr~~~.
. . . . ( ~ _ :
~
i
1 ~ .
~
I~
~t~: . . . _ _ • ; r ` - . - . •
SPOhANE COUNTY GOUR7 NOUSE
STATE of WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
Environmental Checkli st
proposal
file number
, .
~ ` -
'
♦ ~ t ' . • , I / \ ' , \
N
9POHAN$ COQNTY PLANNIr1Ci COMMISSION
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEfFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2274
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
~
- ~ •
. +
A
c
INTRODUCTION: The State Environmental Poli9'y Act of 1971, Chap~er 43,21C, RCW
requ.ires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental
values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The
Act also xequires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions significantly
affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to
help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major
aCtl.OA.
P'lease answer the following questions as completely as you can with the
information presently available to youe Where explanations of your answers
are required, or where you beYieve an explanation would be helpful to govern-
ment decision makes, include your explanation in the space provided, or. use
addit.ional pages if necessary. You should include references to any reports
or studies of which you are aware and which are relev ant to the answers you
provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies in-
volved w1,.th your proposal to undertake the -required environmental review with-
. •
out unnecessary de]lay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to-the
license fox which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval
is soughto Youx ar_swers should include the itnpacts which will be caused by
your proposal when it is completed, even*though completion may not occur until
sometime;,in the future. *This will a11ow all of the agencies which will be in-
vol'ved to sompl.ete their environmental review now, without duplicating paper-
work in the future. . .
No application shall be process until the checklist has been completed and
~eturned to the Pl.an Commissiono State law requires explanations for every "Yes"
and "maybe" answer on the checkli.st and person completing the form may provide
expl anations for "no" arswersa
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the .
State of Washingt.on for various typee of proposals. Many of the questions may
not apply to,your proposal; If a questfon does not apply, just answer it "no" and
continue on to_the next question. ENVSRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORAiI
1. BACKGROUND GORDON W.. CURRY
1. Name of Proponent
2. Addres6 and Phone Number of Proponent: 9209 E. Trent
3. `Date Checklist Submitted 6-16- 76 '
~
4e Agency Requiring Checklist COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
5. Name of propoeal # if applicable i CURRY TWO
, _ . .
1
- - '
. .
l O 6Nature and Brief Description bf the Proposa" (including but not iimited to
its size, genera? design elements, and-other factors that wi11 give an accurate
understanding of its scope and nature ApiD 8.3 Acres f 1 at
aroLnd_ EZcent iji the Northwest Corner. the contour drous
apnrnxxi matPl v 5" i n 1.001
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well
as the extent of the land area affected by any envxronmental impacts, including
any oth.Ar information needed to give an ae:curate understunding of the environ-
mental setting of the proposal): tvni cal val l ev 1 and mostl v 1 evel
8. Estimated Date for Completinn of the Proposal: Auciust 15. 1976 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Governme,nt Approvals Requfred for the
Fropo:.a1( federa L, state anci 1.oca1 including rezones) : Spokane County Heal th
,c`ro^c- P1 anni nc7 Commission ,
10. Do, you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity re-
Lated.to or r:onnected-with this proposal? Yf yes, explain: None
, . .
11. Do you know of any plans by others which may affect the property covered by
your proposai? If yes, explain: None
12. Attach any ot.her app 1 icat a.aa? form t'hat has been completed regarding the pro-
proposal; if none has been completedq but is expected to be filed• at some
future date, describe the natur2 of such application form: NOne .
11, ENVI FcONMENTAL T MPACTS '
tExp 1 anat i.ans of al l"yes" and "maybe" anwer6 are required)
Yes Ma~be No
(l.) Earth. Will the proposa.l resuit in: . ra, Unstable earth condition5 or in char.ges in geologic substructu.res? X
~b) Digrvpti.ors, displacements, compacLion or
overGOvering of the soi 1?
(c;* Change in topography or ground surface rel.ief ~
features?
(d) The destruc.tion, cover•ing or maciification of x
any unique geologic or physical features?
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils,
X
eirher on ar off fhe site?
(fl Changes..in deposition or erosion of beach sands,
or changes in siltation, deposition or eros'ion
• J
Yes MLaybe No
which may modify the channel of a river or stream
or %the bed of the ocean, or any bay, inlet or lake? x
Explanation
(2) Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air
quality?
(b) The creation of objectionable odors?
(c) A.lteration of air movement, moisture or .
temperature, or any change in climate, either
locally or regionally? X
Explanation:
. R~ .
f'1a~' ~ • t~-~- . .
(3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters? x
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns,
or the rate and amount of surface water runoff?
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood
' waters? xx
(d) Change in the amount of surface water 'in any .
water body? x
(e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any altera-
tion of surface water quality, including but not
limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbi - '
dity? x
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of
ground waters? ' X
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either `
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or ~x
excavations? ~
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either
through direct injection, or through the seepage
of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne
virus or bacteria, or other substances into the
ground waters?
(i) Reduction in the amount of water othezwise '
available for public water su lies? n
Explanation: p ~I,~yG~?
v
D .
(4) Flora. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of speciee, or numbers
of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs,
grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)?
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or ~
endangered species of flora? x
.r ~ • "
, Yes Maybe No,
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, ~
. ~
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? X
Explanation:
(5) Fauna. Will tYie proposal result in:
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna) ? X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or ~
endangered species of fauna? X
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area,
or result in a barrier to the migration or movement
of fauna? x
(d) Deterioration to exa.sting fish or wildlife habitat? x
Explanation: (6) Noise. Will the proposal increase exist'ng noise levels?
Explanation:
~
CNA~b J_t"'.J- 4 ~ o,~ c. L . D
(7) Liqht and Glare, Will the proposal produce new light or ~
glare?
.b~. • ' 't-v /-a-1 Explanation:
ryrrir
[(S) Lana Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of
the rre~ent or -la►~new a:~d use ol an ured?
e L.~ ~
Explanation:
L I
(9) Natural Resources. il.l the proposal result in: X
(a) Increase in the rate of use of nay natural resources?
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
Explanation:
(10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited tc- oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions? X
Explanation:
(11) pooulation. Will the proposal alter the location, dis-
tribution, density, or growth rate of the human popu-
lation of an area?
Explanation: . ~ ~ - <e ~ Q +
40,
(12) Housincle Will the proposal affect existi.ng housing,. or ~
create a demand for additional housing? , Z
Explanation :
~
v '
N
Yes Maybe No
(13) 'Transportation/CircuT.ation, Wili the proposal result in: '
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand
for new parking? . x
(c) Impact upon existirig transpor•tation systems? x
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement ot people and/or.goods7 ~
, (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ~
(f) In,crease in trayfic hazards t4 motor vehicles, ~
bicyclists or pedestrian ?
Explanation:-jF-&--'~~~-~~►~r-~~..Q
~
(14) Public Serviceso Wi11 the proposal have an effect upon,
or result Zn a rieed for new or altered governmental services
in any of the fo L lowing areas :
, (a) Fire protection?
(b) Police protection?
(c) Schools?
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities?
(e) Maintenance of public facilitiess inrluding roads?
(f) Other governmental servic S.
,
E xp lanat.i on :~@. c~i•~•~.1~v-~ ~ G~
(15) EnercjX. Will the proposal result in:
(a) UsE of substantial amnunts of fuel or energy? ' x
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development, of new sources of energy? x
~
E.xpianat ion : ,
(16) Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas? x
(b) Communications systems? . -4 ~
(c) Water? x
(d) Sewer or septic taiiks? ~
(e) Storm water drainage7
(f) S olid waste and dipp sal?
Exp lanation:--et., '
w .
.i~f ' ~:~i~ r , f~L~if ~ ~ 1 • .
(17) Human Healtha Will the pr6posal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? ~
Explanation:
~
r . ~ •
. `
Yes MaVbe No ~
(18) Aesthetics, Will the proposal result in the-obstruction
of any s.cenic vista or view, open to t the public, or will '
the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view? ~
Explanation:
(19) Recreationo Will the proposal result in an impact upon ~
the quality or quantity of existing recreational
opportunities? ~
Explanation: ~
(20) Archeological/Historicalo Will the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
Explanation:. (21) Additional Informatione
I I I. S I GNATURE
I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowle3ge t.he above information
is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declara-
tion of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist should
there be any wi.llful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.
Proponent: Gordon W. Curry
Address : 9209 E. Trent ~
Phone : 928-0600 .
Person completing form: Gordon W. Curry
Phone : 9 28-0 600
Date: June 14, 1976 .
~ r ~r ~
~
~
. ~
" , r
7 ~
~eai
Flom M~sher
Curry iVG► P-L-1039A-76 (~d aLi~~ ~tkier similariy ctisposed pl~~~ or zorie Ch~iiges)
I won't attempt to te11 yau what official mecharusm should be ut,11ized to affect the
follovving sequenca of events . but the order of events appears, in my opinion , ta be
as follovv s:
1. Adverise a pub1lc ~~ng at whi+ch the Boarci of County +Gvmm►is$ioners wiu state
something to the effect t.ttat appmval of the prelimfnary p1a# is with+drawn because
of ~ pr~~edurai errar i-n re gard to V~(. 197-1 0-3 4 0.
2. At the above hearing the B. of C. C , shvuld a1so state sorne'~~g tv tha effect that
it has rev~ewed the Planntng Staff 'a evaluatlon of the checkl.ist,,adopts both i~s
conclusion and recommenciation for issuance o# a negati~e dec.Iaratian and dimcts
the ChaimaI to iSS►ue a propo5ed CfP claI'aUon G1~ ~on -'~ig17ifiCa3'1C@ ~Make 8l1rg I
know 1:hfs sv Ican 1~ave paprar work preparec! #or the Board and be "primed" to follow
thrvu~~~ (NOTE: I believa that the i,.CW provides that the Board can accept the
Aaff recoinmendations since they n+~ have DEPARTMI-;N"r status)
3. Have Chatrman sign groposed declaration at that meataag*
4. y,oute wpy of propvsecl declaration to Sf;P.A FIC to start 15 clayS
5. Route copy of pxvp~~ed daclaraUon and checklist to a11 ager~cies of jun sdlction .
6. At least flfteen days a#ter # 4 above, anoth~~ pub1ic he anng should be held
(priofi adv$~sing n$ces$ary)r to re'~nsider ~~pealed plann.ing C'iommissioI~
action a€ mcommandinq deriat c~f the plat.
7. it the hearing ~ove), the Board shoulrl mforence the previous rev~ew and -
adopUan of the staff recomraendations for a nwgaUve dociamtion and state tn,eir
1nt$ntion tC► iSStI~ a fiT1Sl d8Ciar3UC?11 flf 1Yon-81gI11f1canoe. (Ke8p miB post4d +C~~
~ events so the pa,per wcark can be prepared). In ~~s heaaing the Bvard should
also requim the sponsvr to pubish a nc►tice of actior~ an per r~CW 43. ~ .C 080.
fhe Chairman should immedlately sigr~ ~e ftnal declaration.
NUU;: Any change in Heslth District Policy may have to be tak$n into account*
I ha1~ ~ccordingly inclu+ded the newest H.D. memorandum cDneetting the aquifer.
: Fred Dayharsh
Enclosure
TM/dj
_ ,
" ~'E ~.t_.IVr~
-
0 6 197 t ~
~ • ~ ~~y/ .~s~'~-'' , . .
. ' . . : , . . . . ,j/ 1.!~~' .s(' ~~Gi~.` • ' ' (..s?•: .^ta•c.. r. ; j •
. ~ • _ . ~ z _ . . ~ v(~, ` . _ . _ J1-.~•~ '.-~.r•y j~,~•`~, w~ '~7_
. • • ar . . _ ~ , . . . - ~ . ~;r~~w~.~~" M -
, ' . . , ' . - - . .z._, - • . - ' ' . ' . ' . ~ . . ~ . . . . ~+t . . ' • .
~ 3
4
. ~ .
~ IkX i i-iE SU?'EiZIOR COUR."'i OF `I'li~ ~TiA'i'E OI' WA;;II iL~C1TG~1
, . . 6 • , , IN ~ 11idU FOR `'IiE COUk'4TY OF
_ • ~ . . ~ . ~ . 'THEODORE . TLiTER, i-IR . & tIRS .
XINGREY, & 11IRa e LyRSOL3, )
8 1,1R, & 1-qRS. 'r IiL7~ ; 111R. u ; IMa
OL(3ARD , iNlit. & ItIRS . I37 r7~-MIl, ) Ido.
~ M.R. & ~~'.~i.[~S) • TL"a.LT LV 1Z, j.1♦ . tX , .
. . M?S. 1.113JN7,EL, 1.'4R. f- t'IITZ'S. } .
. . i.o j•7iZT Gi:7' , 1.iha. & MR.'i. 1•JUODCOCK,'. ) .
. i IEZ , & ?-Li2S . ~ JOY , :2Ft v & ItS . . . _ ) . , . ~ . . .
COFFiY, ~ r•IR. & M.RS. _ H?1IGHT,
. L.UR ..A d~~LLICK, .F~.:~1D -IZU~~I - , . .QR~.. FOR_.~~ZIi 4X' T~.~~tli~;.
12 ~ CR [3r:,IN i~ir,P,. R. , ~ ~ . . ~ . . ~ .
Petlt].On'G'r3 r ,
13 ~
vS. - ~ - .
- • 14 F30ARJ 0F COU:,~TY C4i-4P~II;~SIJi~T~:~i,:~
~ OI' S PG;CrV' 41f:. CC)J:1'iY, r'-1A.S1IlidGi0ci, }
r, - 5 . ~ ~ _ • ~ ~ . . . - _ ' . -Re
sponde,nt ~ , - , _ _ .
. . ':;~i _t:~: . - _ . - . ~ . . .
_1 6 ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ _ . : - -
17 his matter cominc~ on r: c~utarly for li~~aranc~ ia opE2n cour~c thi:
18 c1dy upon the petition ot mlieodore TQster for a:1zit of Revie;.~
- ~
directec:i to the BOd?'d of County Co_missioner s af S::o;;ane ColLI."Ity,
19 c~~a:~hin~~ton, r.espoziclcn-t, and ? t a~apearing tiza- oi-i :~cce-t-ur-)c.r 9, 1:37G ,
2 the res~onc2erit izia:~e ~~nr1 enternc~ 2~`inclings and O:~c~er i~~ it,s
,
21 proceecli-nga entitl.ed "Pr_eliminary nlat Proposa). anu Zo.ne C'1G;s.si.fi-- .
cat-i-on upRrading P1E-1023A-76, Curr_y 'i:'wa Su'bci:i. Yi ;ion: 2.~.;-?5--76,
n
2~' Actr:iclilturaZ to Sing1c P~ i-ar~lily i?esidGnce: C;oraoij C:L:x:r.rr a;7.id
23 1't' tll~'Ci1~~r ap;~earir_c~ frcr:~ the ~~.legatioizs of tiic ~'°e~.it.ion Lil.:ci
. . _ , _herein=.- that the _.flrdeAr.of.. .,tlle Board was.not . ia comnliance wit2-_-, tize
. ..z .
° . -v•cat~.~-Environment~l.~'olic~ ~!c~ Tir.that, the threshUlcl. c~~.~teri~ri-ra~-~ion
, 25 vias no't completzcl as' i:ianclated_ by 197-10-300; 117--1.0-320;
197--10-330 anu 197-10-340. Further it ~ppears t:,Aat ti~e. Pr~posed
~ L)e:-claration of 'Non-Sigiiificancc en-tnred Jaz7liarv 5,. 19,77 is o~-F i1o
. 27 .
foree ar.d effeet anci zs iiu1l and vaid and -was nat- su,.xpox-tec1 vy
28
. suusLantia.l_ evidence az1d,.waa contr.ary. to law and 'act in that this
29 'action of t1-ic Board of Countv Cormii-ssioners cons-tituted a rnajor
30 action signif? cant-ly a.ffccting the quality nf s.:lYe erivixorxMent
;allich dictated a.full envizanmeiz'k.:al immart sta-t-e-Iment as requircc:l
31 b:~ ~t.C.j~. 43.?1,03~~. il-ae partic:s plaint~.~L h~~vc naic:? for tl~e
32 re-cozd sn t:lc:se prcmyse, iri cau: G 21UI111.)CI: 23G114, a cor,;~zmiarn casc,
0 iWL:R Fnk: f;IRIT UF REV:i I::G'1 1 WORTHIAlGTOy'J' & Wn.z,1THINOTON
. ATTORNEYS A'T L<1yH
E. 8610 SQRAGUE A'JE• '
(3(3U) 926•r)338
' SYOKANE, lPf,`.5HINGTON
i .
• -^s.'~..'.ss" ,~r-~^'• ..11;ti `~~:L~'.~! ,;iyr./-1ySsiR:.~"~:~.✓> ~''+"r 1~ 4 7J;y.•i . , . , ~ : . . _ . • , -
{~Y Jj rw~V, ♦ ~1 ..f~ yR, l ~ •~M ^N~~ /l i'yy~~~~f~ rY~ ~h~ •:v~"~ ~I~w'.4.~TJI~r^C~~w.p. ~nti'
~ r~~ ~ ;'Y~;t. .^•`i";,.~ ti..~~ v.~'~~ .r i~~„ ~t.~. ,i
' .A' C. ^V r3L .1'"' i...• % ~ ~'nr •i •''.i,-. . , ~ I .~'rn~`" `%r~
ti~ ' ~ . ~.'•.r--;~ z ~ , . _,~..t_ ~'r~^ e:~.:'r^ .~•.;•v°~ :~..;w 'r.- _ . 3
J!~. h• L~ nw C r.~. vr, t
-,-~]t- ~~^a ;rrvv. y<•'_ . ~".in ~ - I..-~.. , 1~"' '7. ..~'^.!1"'en"~. '~+.+-1.,' : ~ ~~v'','~"' ~~:~nea~..~ - . ~ . ~TV' ,1~` ~ _ P,. , , * r. . . y ; ti . '~'y'.. ~
• , ~J~~ ' ` . yM_wr ~4 . ' ' ~ . -
. , _ • ` ~ _ . . , > . _ . . . ! w . -T • . • , r . . - , • : . :c... r _ _ , . , • . _ • . . . -
. . . . . _ ~ . . _ _ . . _ . ~
.
r ~ -
~ , -
therefore,. shoul.a not be orderedto pay for the trar.script of
r~' 2 -proceedings :.in ttiis cauSe, bufc, may use . 'the transcript_ ordeiea
. . - _ . . . . ,
in 236114 herein.
St is OI'~LRi:D t1-iat the Clerk of this Court uaidcr iLS snal
. ~ xssue aI-rjrit of I2eview, c3ireeteri to the hoard of Coutntir
Cor:vilissioners of apofza~~e County, ~Ia:~~~inc~~to~z anca r~~r.fuizi nc; it
to.certify;.and -file in - the._court its recozds. in its prcceeciings
above. reterred*to, --with tlle intent. that,.the saiiie be reviewecl
7 . . _ , . . . . .
~ by this Court, as to tizc claims or the petitioner thait .zts
8 Findings and Order in tne proceeaiiic,s were unrcdz;olzaL~lo or
9 unla:•iful, or in the Ellternative to show cause x-7I1y i_t s1lOL1ld i7ot
LA o soe
lo . - ~
_ . . , . : . ~ DOII*,jE 114 OPiTI CUURT thi s 6 dal of rebruary, 1977.
. • . ~ ^•~.D; •-M~• ..4' _i I.'-•• • • _ • ' _ . j•{!~D • t ' .
. . _ ' ' •1.: . ~ . • ~ . • . . ~ . _ . • ~ • ' ' 7 ~ ~~1 ~fJ}!~ ` ~ • ~G ~ E:. r.. t~i
-
12
J U il t3 i:.
13 ~ .
Presentea i;y:
14 . . - ~
. 3, -tI:C7:~ a iYUX`'t'1q.?'~ t~!1 ' ~ ' . : , - • ; : . ; - : : . - _ .
~ ' . . ' 15
. . . ~ ~ ~I . . .
16 ROSS WbRTHINGtOi1 . - - . . • . . : ~ .
: W 0 I-t`r1IIi•.CaT0 N Sc l4TnRTHII+C1TOid ~ -
~ 17 TittornEys for Petifi.ioner s . .
IS Gopv IZeceived this day of
k'ebruary, 1977. • -
19
• 20 , 21 Sl-[ARPE, T"WIGG: & C7F~.'v7 " . .
~ Attorneys at Lu;~i .
22 . ~ ~ .
Co;?y I?eceived this ua1r of
' 23 k,ebruary, 1977. -
. . ~ ~ _ . 24 ~ .,~'r' . `w : • , . • , • . ;,c. - . = ••_r, ~.~..f ...~.J ' . -
f ` ~ . ~ ~ / / ~ r/ ~ IC~ • . . j . -
~ ~7 ~
25
~ . rfI . _ . .
. ~
. 26 }3Q~.R.~ OF CUUi-TTX CO / ~I rJ O1:IIMJr • ' .
, or spOK~~r~E couNTY, WA;11INclON ~ .
~ ~ - 27 - ~ .
~ • . . 28
39
30
~ 32
: QI:TJIj: P, FC?R G1RI T OI' REVI EGd - 2 WOFtTHA'iViG70N &i►YOR7l91N070N
6a17-TORMEYS, AT" LAIN
E. E3816 SPRAGU'E AVtz.
. . ' . 15091 928135: e ~
SPOiCANr-, 4YAStflNOTON
. 992afi .
71rr"
•r~ . •
♦ ~ ~ t ' • , . .
. .
,,'~'~-.',tS,.~-,~...,,!.. :1..~;.';W;• - • ,`~M,s~•',~ r ~wr,~, •y•.~n.' ro,r~}`^' "''yl~,/`~;; :"4~,...v"-„•~1r:' ~f,~~~.Z.,.. ,,,M'l ,w,ry;.F+y;n . ~ + ' y -~1~,~.'T ~-I..;...~~:~".t•'✓: ' ~ ~.t
. ~F > ~ ' ,r,..~~'' . ~ - r
rT ."'7~Sti. 1+~/'~\1 ~:.~a::~. , ~'r ~ 1 M ~~M` ~ , -..M,':1.~ '.'t-.+^.'.•,'✓:~ , C ~r1' .r~~ • • w~./._
y'T.~~~. _ F • .~:v~ ~ . ~ • . ,~C : : . . , _ . ~ .P,..l"" y; ^~.~1~.. ~ • ~ . .
~'..•l' .r:.~++- 'Y~~~ .1 ~ ~,~~.t-: ~ .a~ f.'1'..~.^,-.~ _y * ~;~~"~i;il:r f'°"°~iP' . AAy~ ~ ; jI ~...j~,~..~•. ~y , ~.i~-~ ~
° ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ . ' • . • ~ , s " ~ r r . . . - ~ ' ~ . . . , . . . . ~ '
, . . . . ~~..~-w~~-._a.. _ ~~.,c -~t.: ~ ..I . • ' .r , ~ ` ~ ~t~. w _ . - ~ • ~ .
a~E coG SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter-Office Communication
~ r~ ~ A, , -
Date: March 23. 1977
T0: ,Files,,,Sppkane County Planning Commission ATTN: ]XJight Hume
FROM: Dennis. Kroll ~
SUBJECT: Curry Two~Preliminary Plat On March 21, 1977, a 12 feet deep excavation was made at a point 50 feet east and
50 feet south of the Northwest corner of subject plat.
There was no evidence of any impervious cla-i or bgdrock; thus concluding the absence
of a spring or other "shallow; ground water source at the observed location. The
"water bearing" strata involving both Garrison Gravelly loam and Phoebe Sandy loam
soils, (typical of subject plat ) usually occurs beneath an impervious layer in excess
of 100 feet beneath the ground surface.
DK/paf
SCHD-ADM-030
UE1'All7'ntEN," OP CONSLI:YATION
TnicuHnau .._D~rrit ~t:~~ " . ~Ol~ ' „ANU UliYGLOI;A~I:NT ,AP~,_~~6748 y' ~
~nxee• , ~
MA?NItIAL (fncl) (teet) ~
WTION . ~~~~1 WLLL LOG . NOu y+',
Dtito.... "no,..:a , 1063.. . ' ►
, Uelith furwnrJ
..I~~.-curtl uy.: . ~?'~.~Or
.
~ ~arci~ G3 ~~~y s~,~~►•~~~, ..Dr~.].l.vr~o ,.necord
SIiLs 901 on 5~ 19 I
Location; Staie of WASIIINGTON ~ ___.I , " '
No yroll toot m4do. okane
„ rn County ATea ........................,.A
Map
sF,2/dSE,Ya sCC,~~..T 2~ ..N.,R.~i`t ,.E~,
Drilling Co, ~Dlagram•o(Sectlon
..Ho].man .~rSll~n Co~? . ora~...~on
. . :
AddressZt...~~..Ainth.Ave.t ...Spokane...~l~. ~as,hin~ton .
Cab].e
Method oP Drilling.................................... Datc.Ma...rch 6 , 1D........ . ,
O~vner.....Trant~~rood ,Zrrigation District
• .
Address.~:.~~....Trent Rd.~...Trentwrood~.Wash9ngton......
~ .
~ Q ~ I~!L 1 , at~;a.
above
Laiid surface, datum.a.....» ...............fL
~y ! ~J ~ • ~ . ~1~~ ~ ,
LU. Coent- • " • ' TxicKxess
WT10N MATTIUAL (ItM) (1ltt)
f~
~°1i~! ~~•,;t
~ I ~~4•t~ , (Tranecrlhe Jriller's terntlnology lilnrnlly but pnraphrnee ne neccaaury, In porentheeee.
Il materinl wuler•bcnring, en eluW unJ recurd uliillC Icvel It reported, Cive drpth3 1n teet"'IX,
~ below Inud•eur(nee dutum unicea ollicrwlao Indicuted. Corrclate with stratigr4phic colUmlh, iJ
1f teneible, Follotivln¢ loc of muteriele. Ilot all cneluirs, yar(oraUone, ureene, ete.) zraval & bouldei~s ~ 0 ~ 16
Coaxse 'grav'e:l.. I ib ~ 70 (e'i; +
Gravel, with hardpan & clay ==~&.70 ~66 ~ ~r • 'r i .
;'~a
~~Coarse gravel ~ 1 86 I 96 I ~ . . . . , ~ pan ~c gravel
Iv !u ,J yti t, , I 96' 1101 ~ ~ I ;~~~~'~~'~SI~~'Syq~ ' •
~t,~,~ ~ { Gravel and sand .1101 1103
~r')), „y
~ ;
~,03 ~
~ ;
l10
7~~ •r►~i' IFa.ne gravel and alay
~ I ,`~r;~°~S; ~TSJ% • 1.110 u2 k;;~~ • .
"~4~~~ A!~ . J'Fine gravel
~ ,~h • ~ ~ i~w~',4;~~~;~ ~';s~ Coaxse gravel 112 ~ 1132
~;';~".,~lti~. . . l;~ti• .
Fine gravel 1132 .134
,Coaxse gravel~ ,1134 1138 r`•~.
Sand md.xed with ~ small , gravel 1138 .1142 ~
' ~ , ~ tw 1:' ; . I ~ ' . ~ ( • ! ~;~1; .
• ~ f,~l;,i~ ' I Cia Ejs1gS 2011 frOI~ 0 t0 1401 lPerforated from L2 to 1361 s, V. No. 1.+ 111-05-0•01-? lNo 'screens. ~ ~ ~ . ti►~; .
~ ' ,Y'} r ` ~ . ' , •
Turn uD , SI►eot».. of sheet~ ~O-
, ~ . , ' '
'f'ile Or.',,;inal and Ftist Copy with '
Department of Ecology WATER WELL REPORT APP11caUon Np. .
Second Copy - Owner's Copy
Third Copy - Drilicr's Copy STATE OF WASFiINGTON Pcrmit No... ~
.
• • .
(I) OIVNE.R: I1ame........_...~_.l-~....~..1! ..~'!./.s1!.'~Gri~....T...t!!t._.~ Addres~.---~--_.._.--•--_.----•--__ .
.
-
(2) LOCATION OF NVELL; count
y......_-r._.__..._W._
Bearing and distance from sectlon or subdlvislon corner • ~3 y£j
(3) PROPOSED USE; Domestic 14 Industrial ❑ Municfpal ❑
10~ WELL LOG:
,
Irrigation Q Test Well Other ❑ FormatSon: Describe by color, charecter size of materint nnd sii-ucture, and
, show thickness of aquifers and the kindand hature of the mnteriat in each
(4) TYPE OF WORK: Owner's number of well siratum penetrated, with at ieasi one eniry Jor ench change of formation.
(if more than one).... NLATERLAL ~ FROM ~ TO
New well 9 biethod: Dug ❑ Bored ❑ ~ • +
Deepened Q Cable Q Driven ❑
RecondiUoned ❑ Rotarq ❑ Jetted ❑ • ~
r ~ .
(5) DIAIENSIONS: ' vtarrieter of weu _ inches,
/
Depth of completed we1L.__--✓`.'.~d_,-"t,
(s) coNSTRucz,rax DETAILs: . ~ I
Casing installed: ......4L.• D,am. frorn rt. to
' Threaded ❑ " Diara. from !t. to it •
Welded ❑ " Diam. irom ft. to it. 6-1 f3 7
Perforafions: yes No ~ I
o A (
?ype of perforator ued__..____.W.
SIZE of perfozaEiona in. by in,
, pertoretions irom ft. to -=151'
!t.
Perforat3ons irom _ ft. to ft. ~ st/.~ li~Gt"y Z ~ ~
. p 76
Screens: Yes p xo
Dianuiacturer's Name__.__...__..__.__~~.~_._,__.._..~-••...._.._ - - I -
Type_......__._...,..------_......._..__...._.~._____.....~ Model No__------.._._._._.___._ -
~ ~
Diam. Slot size ft. to..__....___._ it. ~z -A
Diam. Slqt size from ft to it
~Go
Gravel packed: yes ❑ NoO Size of gravel:
Gravel placed from .r_.._._._____......~ ft. to ft.
~ i i ~ Q ~.v
Surface seal: yes j~ xo p To a'hat depth4 4!.o , n.
1bIaferial used in seal-A~F.~~?y`..°•r.l..!.~~'
Did any sirata contain unusable watert ' Yes ❑ No~ • ~ _
'ypt o_ wat_r".___..._ ~ 7eptL of 4' trata-
Method of sealing strata o8..~----_-------___._._._..-_----•---__.----_-----•---,~ ' (
I
(7) PUAIP: Manufacturer's Name_._.__..__.._._-__-_ ...._...__.s._..._._.~_ ' ! ~
Type: Hp._....~.----------- I ~
. Land-sw-face elevation ~
(8) j~ATER LEVELS. above mean sea level....
-ft .
static level
> ft. below top of well Date._-~
Artesian pressure lbs. per square inch Date • '
Artesian water is controlled by._.____.....__ . ..._..r... ~
(Cap. vaive, etc.) ~ -
(9) WELL TESTS: Drawdown is amount water level is ~
lowered below static level Work startQd--~5--...- 1-5 Completed...-/..~ 73
tifi . 19...._...
as a pump test made? Yes ❑ N'ox If yes, by whom?.._-_-. I
Yield: gal./min. with ft. drawdown after hrs. ~6YELL DPFLLERs SSTATI`rEirJEIII`:
M q
This well was drilled under my jurisdicfion and this rcport is
N » true to the best of iny knowledge and belicf.
Recovery data (time taken as zero when pu.mp turned off) (water level
measured from w•ell top to water level)
1~i
Time K'ater Level Time Water Level Time Water Level NA " - •
(Person, firm, or co
rporation) (Type or print)
_..Y . Addres~.~U~
" J
` ~ :
Date of test
. .
[Sigmed].. -IP.t.`,. ..l:..l`T.._I,~.r
_
Bailer test._._..____.gal,/mi~s. with_._.~___....ft. drawdown alter_.._. .~_..hrs. (Well Dnller)
Artesian How g.pm. Date
. . , y~.
Temperature of x•ater__ Was a chemical analys3s made?'. s~ No ❑ License No............ Date.............
1~..
A~__-CUSE A DI JONAL SFi£E'I'S IF :`+ECESSARY) '
- , r'1 ~ l`~. , - -
sYnrc oF wnsHiNGroN.
.
DEPAltTntENT OF CUnsr;YtVnTlON
. ANI) I)l;V13,0111191,N7'
7
. . 392
' • 1~VlLiJ LOQ. . . „ NO. ~.PpZl~. -y....».......°„'~~ .
.x.s1~~~.
. Driie 10.45.
necora by.... owne
. , . So,irrr,,..drilleS'.l..o .,..5'.G.C.A,X:d
' Locnlion; w!tile oP WASI-IIVGTON ,
. County ~..P.Qkun4....... _.._..,~.....M.....
' Area ....a.........._..,....,...
. ~ Mnp
.1~.111. ~l4 M~I.. yi t;ec..+,.l..:l',..c.4'.N,, Dlagram ot Section
ni-iut,to co Q!c!~4r. ,
.
Addresa
Method oE Drillln6 Datc............... I9...... a
~ .
Owner Q.e.QVg.e... A.t....F.Q 4 T'S C~~ e.............
' Address....... SPokane.x...Wash........w..~.. ..:...........~..~..~...~~F
above '
, •
Land surface, datum .......................1t.belovV'..~..»..»......a..».............._.._...».....,~.~a
Com- TttiCKNe88 DRP7it
LATION MATiRIAL (18Ct) (IeCt) Ai•~~ '
. tf
(Trnnecribe ilrillcr's terminology liternlly but Parnvhrnae ne ncccseary, in ynrenthe!es.~''~~~' ~
• ~ if mntcrinl water-benring, eo atnte and record etulic levcl if reported. Clve dcUthe in fertl,~;? ~
~ ~ Lelow land-eurface Jntum nnlesa ot{wrwieo Indicnted. Corrclate with etratigrnpbte't0lCnin,
tf fcaeible. I'ullowin¢ IoK of mnterhile, liet aq cnulngs, perioratione, ecreena, etc.)
I Top soil I 4~ I 4~'r`'` .
. ~ ~ SoFt dirt &gravel ~ 1 124 112$
~
t
~ pu14P TEaT : I I ' ~~t
. , ~ Dirn. 128tx6"
. ~ ype & size of pump: Jac~zzi t-n
.
.
aiscnar e
. . ~ W4
. , . , , 1 Ol 1 • ul"Ec
`lA~
' , ' 4 ~ r•~ u ~r'.
~ . --C+~-1-I~ • ~ _jq€-~ tt ~~hr ~
stpel cain
Y ield: 25 pz-nsmm
I l;r~n. •
• ~ . . I I ' ~;`i1
. , I I , •
• , ' , I ' I I ~;c`~
2nrn a➢ ~ Shect 4L_ shcets
. ~
1ti'L'LL LVU~-~.OUIIIIUCCI ,
vi;Pnx~'Mr;NT or corrsrnvnTIox
-r,_.._ . ~ ANU DLVI;LOI'MLNT
Cnnns• Tii ifu,~)cas ...,Derr1~ ,...,L,.T ~NO P,~~~ .~'906,
LATIOH MATKIUAI. Icct
~v'Lr i ~vu ..»....»».?'!4,
• S!:
Dal(1...........................................,....~ ~Q.,......
. Ue`rth farwnrd
llccrird l,r,..;~.g I I ri......................... . i .
~ E111'-'ORA7'IUiVS : c~.x'~,~,a:t.~.... rc~q.Qrd
Casing perFo a 5 7~~:r,•
Locnt{on; Slnie u1 WASlI]NGTON
'5-1i0-]:~5-P-0r7f'6 . 1~x1; f1 I ;
. , , ....Spokane,
. ~~.Y County.
' ' ' »
I ~Aren .
Map .
NW4 SeC.3.1+..T1.6.N., R...44.. DlaLrremolSecuon
S t
Sp .._.~..a~.~._......~.
Drill{ng Co.... .9 A. Holman & Son,....~~ ~
o~ane~.. Wash
Address.. ~
r~
~
Method oE Drilling Date............................,., 19.......~,j~?,,~~• ~
...,.............~..~................~~k,
Owner...~.~a!~1...JoY
r , Address... ~ane, s. ~
~ .
Land surlace' dAtum »...it,above
Contir- ,
• I . ~ti~~~ ' . ~ T1lICKNK98 DEMtI
~ ' ~ ~ ~ • LATION MA76f1iAL ((eC't) (1CCL) Pjq r!' ~
~ ' , ~ ~ • ' ~
(Trnnecrlbc Jrillcr'e icrininulu¢y Uternlly but liurnphrnae nn necesaary, tn pnrcnthcses. ~
.~yt
If mntcrial wutcr-Lcarini;, NU NUIU- unJ ncurd utittia lcvcl (f rrportcd. Givc dcpthe In fcetijil
I, •.~,~4 , beluw Innd•eurfncu dnlum unlona otherwlno indicnlcil. Carrclote tvith etrntigrnphio.column,J~,Ja
~
~ ~:4~~~ ' if teneibla 1'olluwhi¢ lug of muturinln. Ilnt nll cudnye, Partoratfone, ecreens, etc.)
I Top soil 1 21 YelloVi clay b0 62
'~~~~''`~~•~~~~t`~ ~ I~F"1ne sanc(~$c Pea gravel wb 1 ~3f
~ , ~ I j~ t•` , ~ l~
BITO tSfT'1 t;ta
37
I
lWel.l developed approx. 251g.p•m~
jupon c6mpletion with no -moasure~
,n ble
~„~~~~,Q.~y,i~J~~~~ • ~ . .
arawaown t nax.Ler test
. , ~ ~,s~, .1~,~,~' W i ~f~Ip I tr,~A`1►
~~1~ 1 ~t11 ~ kUkLU*j
I "y.~'i '"~'~~"j;~~ IT~'YYYTi ~ • I .~.,.~t .
41
I ,~~~7 . M-C
, ~ I . r`,~,
L.LCLLL•
~pa & size of aumn: Iajgbtqr 26~•p.mr~~,. , . .
~
I r rr ir «,motor: 1 h.~ ~ . ele~ ,
I
.
~Ay1.NG,
n .5, l~~r m 0~'m . 1T$~'fti.
aiam O~L • , • ,
d V
r~~'•9 • ( ` • r+l~
s. P. xa, ~-1'•s4 -.3Id. ( .ovex )
Turn up ~ SheCt oE. ..3hects
~ , t~4~;; ~ ' , • '~:~r
. ' ~r ~
sYArE oF wnsHINGror
, • UEWAILTAtEN'1' OF. CON5I?1tVAi"ION
• ; ANU ll1:VELU1'&Y1:N'i''
. . ~ W,;LL r,oc~ ~ . No,.Applv.....39~7..
.
Dntc.....dUriC
IO i -
~ nccurcl by...,..+...,A,~. 1aa.ma.u
~ , ~
. sn„i-Co dr. i1.lar1.3...r..ocar..cj........a...........
4 Location; SUiic nP WASIIINGTQN
S.okane-
. . , . . . County »
Area.... ,,yr... ~ .
22~
. . ~ MUp...,.......,,...........„............................................... aL~'~+n!
.51~'Y1 5CC,.,33:1",.26 fV,, DingramotScctlon
~ Dr{Il3oiU (:o ...,Iiolinan
,
' Address....Q:l
Method oY Drilllng...,.1..rll..Qd........
, , ~ ~k~'F
OWlICP.... Jc1Ta8S..Z,..••
~ ~,~~,~}6•• ~~~1' ~Y
~
. . ; , . Address...12211...u.pri.Yex.... riu.a,_..Spoka
t~above ..».~..~......M..~~.
Land surface' datum......~..._....1
•
Conna- . . TtttCxxtse ~ Derrn
L+riox MAzemAL , (teet) (eeet)
(Tranacrf`n driller'e tcrminolo¢y liternlly but Dnrnhhrnee as necceeary, In parenthesce. A'
• If mntcr(nl wntcr•bcnring, so etnk und record stntic levcl I( repnrtcd, Givc drpths !rt feetti
below Innd•eucfnce dntum unlees olherwixo indlrnted. Correlate wltli etrntiCrnyhle coltlnin,r:~`'{ •
~ 1( teaaible. Following lo¢ oI matoriule, llst all cudn~e, yerlorntlono, acreens, etc.) ~
. ~ ~ LB.I.a.clt.s
Y.ea.lol-r.la. ?.~.1..~.Q ~F~~'► . .
r ~
Sef y~2~
. t._b.as.a,lt.
~ . . ; l
PUr~ 1 EsT :
Diam. 611X62 1
~ ~ SWL : -12
llD : 4$ f t.
Yi-_ ~~d;.2
~ . ~ ~ ~ ' I I .
h;. p, in jector deep we1h. numAl
~
h.p. 3400 r.p.m. .
~ ~ .
-Cas iw: .-t,or, rj I
r
Tutn up ~ Shcet of shcets x~•~t'
, , ~ .
STATE OF 1VA51IINGTUN
~ DUIPARThiLNT OI~' CONSEItVATION
APPl. 11184- DIVISlON 0[' 1YATL1t 1tE5UUliCCS
, . . . WELL LOG . . . N • r~~,
. Record by............ DxiLLez ;
' Driller
Sourcc....„..........................S...r~~oXd...................... - ,
Locntion; Statc o1 WASI-IINGTON '
. • ~i~s
~ . County....... S.P.oka?1.
~ . ~ }
. 11rea
, . . • ~ • Map...a
~ ' ' • ' .5 ..D/4 .5.B..1/4 SCC..11.....T25....N., R....44....~y, ---Diagramlo(Scctloa--- ~~a;
Drilltng Holman Drillin m
, . Co.... .P,..~4..p.AAy ~•n
Y~''n i~
' • Addreis
~~~,t•~
~ . Method of Drilling Datc......................... 19........
. ~ ~ . Owner..._Irvin iJater Dirs tict.. ~#...6
N. ~ 3120 Bulter, Spolcane, Washington 'W
~ Address:.,».................................................................. ........w.....
above
• Laiid surface, datum.....19,a9. .......ft. belovv......................................:................. .4..4
SWL;....7E Date.................................... , 19........ Dlms,:........................
~
• • ' , ~ ~ ' ' Conns• ~ MAT611fAL ~ From To
' ~ • wsiox (icet) (icet)
. ' ~
(Tranecr!be drUlcr's tcrminulu¢y Ulcrnlly bul rxrnphrnee na ncr.ve+ury, IIl pI1tCTIlIw1C9. .0;
~ If mnWrinl wuter•beuring, xn xtutu iinJ rocur(i ylnUc lt-vel if repurtcd. Givro di-Ptlis In fet-t ~..4
below Innd•rurfncu dutum uulcau utburwlne hiJicateJ. Corrclutu with Ktrntigrulabie culufun,
1[ tcoeiblc. I'jI~.wln¢ luy ut mutcriale, liut ull caaina:+, perfurutlons, scrcrne, etc.) l;:l
, . ~
Municipal supply
lboulders and gravel ~ o
~ gravel ~ 22 ~ 100
. hardpan OPP ~ 100 117 r~
' . • Casin ~ 1 } ~w~r
, ~ 6" from 0' to 117" I Parforations: 3/8" by 3"
540 erf
~ p . from 183' to ~15'
Peerless turbine 100 H~ f ~.;•i
0r~
. . . . . . ~I I ~
, • ~ I ~ i~)~.
' , , . ~ I I I '
. . ,
Turn uy ~ S1ject.«.._».,.of»,.,»....-shcets
' • •
~ ~ . . • '
, • , • o ~ A i t Ur wASh i NL2 i uIN
~ . DEPAR7MEN7 OF CONSERVATION
AND OEVELOP,MENT • ~ff~~
~ •rr ~ •~r~~~~~~ ~M►~~~r1i~~.~• • • ~•!)1
. . , . . WELi, Loc.
nQcP Aupuet 14 Cert,_ 1027-A
~ , . Rccord by... . , W. D: Reedell
sourro, Driller 's Record
• • ~ i ~ ~
. Location: State of WASHINGTON
~ , '
; ,
,
Co .untY S-oQk$Il~ ~r,.
• ; Arco ~ ~ • ,
' ~ . ~ ~ Mi~ ~ , ~:+f~~~► ~ ~~y
5"rentwoa~Oronarda
. ~ Tr.
• ~ 't SCC: 3...T,.25-N., R.DUGRAM OA iECTION
. D►;litf►g Co. W..---D- Re.eder W
Addresc Mead, Wash,
!
. Mcthod oE Drillinr Dnte -901Aw 1942..
' OWn~r Tze ~OIL~IfY.~..if1.trin ~r ~~':K'.•d-
. Address. N•_!4:LO1 Adams ' Ad. I 'Opportunity ay~~
above
Land turjatt, Jalum below
. . . CORRR• . . , ~ THICKNQ59 • DBPTII
• I.ATIUN MATHIItAL (feet) (ICet) ~rr(~
I ('Cranecrilw Jrillcr'o tcrniinology litcrnliy but parepliresc as naccssary, in pnrenthcccs. I(
~ matcr{nl wuicr•ocnriny, YO B14L0 QAII rCCOftJ 6tpllC lOVCI 1f f(:pJtlCd. Give depthe in [cct below lond•
sur(ucu datuiu :ml¢as othcrw45P Ipdicnted. Corrclato with strutiyrayhic column, it fcusib1G. Nollow-
ing loti ut mak:ials, ligt all cudnge, por(arnlions, ccrcans, ek.)
s~AY'9,Q~At7(~ & t]All~ f~AY'9 • ' 49 4.LL- e•.,
~ ,
Fl;ne. sand ~ 29 115 ~1.•
bv-
~ ~,~.ue cjav 5 120 t{ . ~'17r
~
~
Cparae 9ADd & bouldera 27 141- ;IN:
, . . . . . ~ ~
FMD-ZB.st- ~t ;h
Dim; 11~8' x 12" Drilled ~~J,-E
. . ~ SWL: 81'
DD: 21 ' Xield : 540 g.u.m,
. . , Casing; 1211 dia, from 0 td 1481
Perforations t *
8 rows 3/811 x li" 5 per ft1.- from
~ . ~ 120 to 1471
'rUtri Up 6heef 9t 3beca
. • ' 4'
' • ' • .
I . , . ' .
, ' ~ . .
, STATC aF AVASUIrGTUn
DEPARTDTLNT Or CONSEItYATION t
• . ~ ' DIYISION OY WATBIt RIiSOURCGS • v~
~ . _ : . . ~ . WEi,L i,oG~
; -
, ~ - Rccord by.....pr.i.l.l.~r
~ priller. 's ecd . ~
, . Source.......,,..., .
Locatlon: Statc of WASI-IING'fON
~
~ , • County. spokane
~ . Arca.......... . .
~ '9 • ~
Mal
t---- ' - ~ - ~ r'A
• Xr•r,,/4 .l%E,vq SCC......T.25IV,, I19... .4. E.
Dingram ol Seotlon
~ Drilling a....... III,s~
kane, Wash r`~~'
~ AdC,ress..541a....~...~th..Sl?o ~.......1.5.................I
Met.,od af Drilling.. Pab.~ 2 Date. S ep~.~.....,.,..,....., 19.. ~ r
Owner w.~!1...-~... i
.
Address....... E~...~4.~~.~..~C.~rlL.A.V.e.,►,... 5 P. A ka n e. f ..W . .a5 it
.
i ~
~ t.`~hove '
oW........
~ , . .Lai~d surface, datum ~el
' Date..Septe..l 19.~6 Dims.; ~:6~' 120
. SWL . . .
. . . ~ From ~ To
Conna~
LATION MAreluA4 ' (feet) (feet)
~ . . . . •
~ (TranecriLa drilicr's tcrminology lilcrolly but i' irnlohrrise na nrccdeury, tn l+nrcnthcace.
' ,
It mnterial wnter•benrind, nn atuk anJ recurtl stntic Ievel if reportcJ. Giec depths in lect
bclow Inna•enrfncc dntum unlcns ollicrwire indicnted. Corrrletc wilh alratiKrayili(c"column. '
II fenaible. F,iIlowing luy of muteriuln, list nll eueinge, porforntione, screene, etc.)
Irriqation
I tk
Topsoil 0
Gravel 1 ~ 25
~~4~
. ~ . ~ Gravel, boulders 25 32
~
. , . ~ ~ ~ Gravel -3/4 -g" , I 32 ~ 46
Boulder 46 47
Gravel 2-4 47 54
~ ~ ~ 54, 84.1
. Gravel, cemented
Gravel~-1", loose 84 ~ 102
Gravei ~-1", tigh.t.., . ~ 102. .N 108
~ - . Gravel i-1", loose ~ ~ . 108 I 120 .
Casing; 16" from 2-122'
~
Perforated from 88-118'
5urface sealed witli bentonite slu,ry to 1Q';_
Pumn: 200 h,p. deep well turbire
ti
~ t Layne & Bowler
]
, xurn up Sheet ~.....,ol....w.w.....shcets
• , ~
, , • .
. 'F •J `
- 12 4- +
~
~ . - - - - - - - - . - - - _ . - - -
, , .
; .
r .
. , ~ .
z 7
e ( ~
, ' .
' ' . ' ~ 1 + :
. `
_ _ _ . _ . . _ ~ ~ ` . ! _ _ ;
,del ~ eu.a ey ~-w o . ~ .
,
. ,
, _ . ~ . _ _ . . . . _ m.t-- ~ . ~
• ' ~C~ ~-'P ~ ~ 4 + ~ ; .
. ~ .1 ;
4t
~ L a ~ k e '''-7-• ~ .~04 ~ ~ ~ ~~L~~~_~ • 'c~
~
T ~ S
. ~ ~IlrlTwoC ~ l~t~/ 3
~ , .
- - - ~ _ - - • ^._.e._ ~ . _ .
, -__.____3_.-_----, - . . .z _ . ,
: ~ ~ ? • ~
, , .
_ ` ~ ~ . _ _ _ _ . . - .
• ~ ~ ~ ~ , • -
a
~ ' ~ • ' 1 -J _'-i._--
~C/~S l~ 1hr VJ'Gini eGlg R`~l TWC~ .
y P ~ / ~
7.z _
R E C E I V E
MaR 15 1977
SPOKANE COUNTY
. ~ PIANN{NG OEPARTMEMT
~
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY C01,1MISSI4NERS OF SPOKAFIE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 7N THr MA'I"n;'R C;ONCERNING PRI;UMINARY ) •
SUI3LI_v15T4ta 1iND ZONE CLASSIFICATION > N4TZ~r ~;:~:~~~1{;i~.
UPGRt~UIIJG, PE-1023A, CU~Z~iY ~'WO ADDIZ'ION )
(Revised), ZE-75-76, AGRICULTliRAL TO )
. SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1), CURRY )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN th.at the above entitled matter coming on
regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of
Spokane County, Washington,-and the Board being desirous of giving
said matter further consideration did deterrnine to continue this
hearing to 1:00 P.M. on March 10, 1977,to reconsider the threshold
declaration concerning the above mentioned preliminary subdivision
and zone classification upgrading on property located in:
Section 34, Township 26 N., Range 44, E.W.M. The
South 539 . 3 feet of the Noztti 1,650.2 feet of that
q portion of the SW4 of Section 34 lying east of a
line drawn from a point in the North line of said
SW4f 1578.6 feet east of the NW corner thence to
a point in the South line of said SW4j 1579.2
feet east of the SLJ corner thereof, except the
South 179.76 feet and except that portion lying within McDonald Road. '
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at'
said hearing and present testimony.
~
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this lOth day of February, 1977.
~ .
; , .
VERNON ja . QHLAND
Cle of the Board
.
B Y :~~f%';>~~
~
y~ Publish: The
Falls, Feb. 18
;
~ .
.
~ . . .
-
CIA
.Y .
. . .
No. 77 315
.
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
PE-1023A-76 I~.T THE MATTER OF RECONSIDERING THE )
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION PRELIMINARY )
APPROVAL; AND Z4NE CLASSIFICATION )
UPGRADING ON PE 1023A-76, CURRY TWO ) RESOLUTION
ADDITION (REVISED), ZE-75-76, AGRICUL- )
TURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL )
(R-1) ) WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution #76-1195 , the Board of County Commissioners
did approve the preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading, subject
to conditions contained therein; and WHEREAS, the Board was desirous of reconsidering the threshold determination
and approval of said plat and zone change; and
WHEREAS, the Board did hold a public hearing on March 10, 1977 to consider
the above and did formally withdraw their approval of said plat and retained juris-
diction in the matter,pending additional consideration of the environmental assess-
ment; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing those in favor and those in opposition were given the
opportunity to provide information relative to the above, and
WHEREAS, the Board has considered the testimony of said hearing and any
additional studies derived from other departmertsor agencies,
NOW,' THEREFORE, BE IT FORMALLY RESOLVED that the Board of County
Commissioners, as responsible official, does hereby order that a proposed Declara-
tion of Non-Significance be signed and that the Chairman of the Board is hereby
authorized to sign a Final Delcaration of Non-Significance upon compliance with
the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of County Commissioners does uphold
their decision to approve said preliminary plat and zone classification upgrade
pursuant to Resolution #76-1195 and the conditions confiained therein.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
JERRY C. KOPET, CHM.
RAY W. 'CHRISTENSEN
ATTEST:
VERNON W. OHLAND
Clerk he Boar By:
eputy v
~ 4S
~ .
No. 'yf 1195
,
BOARD OF COUIVTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE GOUNTY, VVASHINGTON
FINDIIVGS *AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE
CLASSIFICATION UPGRADIIVG - PE-1023A-76, CURRY TWO SUBDIVISION: ZE-75-76,
AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAiVfILY RESIDENTIAL: GORDON W. CURRY
WHEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Commission did, after public
hearing on October 8, 19 76, forward to the Board of County Commissioners a
recommendation that the preliminary plat to be known as Curry Two Subdivision
(File Number PE-1023A-76) and Zone Classification upgrading (File TJumber
ZE-75-76) be denied, and
V1lHEREAS, Gordon W. Curry, did by letter dated October 15, 1976, request
a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and
testimony against the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the
above-described preliminary plat and zone change upgrading, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did hold a public.hearing
November 12, 1976, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission
and testimony and request of the applicant, objectors, and other interested
p artie s , and
Z/VHEREAS, at said hearing, opportunity was afforded those favoring and
those opposing the above-described preliminary plat proposal and zone change
upgrading, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County having fully
considered the testimony given, the records and minutes of the Planning Commission,
the environmental assessment, and alI other evidence presented: and having per-
sonally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question does hereby find :
1) That the proposed plat exemplifies a compatible density with the
surrounding are a . ,
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of County Commis sioners doe s conclude that
the preliminary plat of Curry Two Subdivision and zone classification upgrading
should be and hereby is approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record
and/or attached sheets as noted (Exhibit A). .
2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more
than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot °
be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat.
3. That the plat provide for right of way widfih for streets as indicated on
the preliminary plat of record. ~ .
4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be '
held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: '
- A I' strip at the ends of edges of all streets that terminate or border the '
plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streetsterminate
at the pl at bound arie s) .
5. That appropriate street names be indicated.
-1-
t •
6. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the
approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department
and the utility companie s. Written approval of the easements by the
utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
7. That a plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved
by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must
also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The
health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district
will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water
plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will
adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certifi-
cation will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of fihe final plat on a
copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have.
been made with the plat sponsor for construction uf the water system,
in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide,
in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the
appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits
within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision
holding Spokane County and tne purveyor harmless from claims by any
lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat
sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect tnat the public
water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and
the local fire district and a purveyor will be installed within this plat,
and the subdivision will provide for individual domestic water service
as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot.
The Spokane County Health District has determined that the soil conditions in the plat are suitable for on-site sewage
disposal systems on each lot.
8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to
the filing of the final plat.
9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to 11/1/77.
10. That streets be improved to standards established by Spokane County or
a bond to cover the cost of such improvements be furnished the Courny
Engineer: The bond may also cover the cost of "as built" plans,
engineering costs, and placing of final center line monuments.
11. That profiles of streets, cross sections, proposed grades, and drainage
plan of the plat be submitted and approved by fihe County Engineer and
by the Planning Director before the final plat is drawno Prior to accep-
tance of the improvements or release of bonds, a certificate by a re-
gistered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor will be required in-
dicating that all improvements have been installed to the lines and
grades shown on the approved construction plans.
12. Conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of
the right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat
by the County En~jineer. Thafi an additional 10' of right of way on McDonald
be provided, and that the dedication contain a statement to the effect
that individual lot access ta McDonald Road be prohibited.
-2-
v • 13. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to '
be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff.
ZONING RECOMMENDATION: Approve Curry Two Addition (Revised) as
indicated on 1he preliminary plat of record to the Single Family Residential
(R-1) Zone Classification upon filing of the final plat. '
DEC 1976 B4ARD 4F COUNTY COMMISSTONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
, . ~
1)i
l!9 ~a
c 1d,~~V 0 y
n {::l't ''ii`,-•~a
.w ~i•livb.j~~
jtRRY C. VOP-ET
HARRY M. LARNED
ATTEST: .
VERNON VV . OHLAND
C l,e°~~f Boar/d,, -
~
B y : ~,6~~ ` "~'✓.'/~,i'.y : ~:i ` ; .
` Deputy
-3-
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter-Offi ce Communi cation
ry o~
Ddte: SPn Pmhej 16r 1976
T0: Snokane Countv Plannine Commission ~
FROM : Eueene C. Prather. , R. S.
SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat - CURRY TWO
1. Reference map of subject, scale 1" = 50' by Simpson, dated
September 15, 1976.
2. The topography and soils in the lots in this plat are suitable
for installation of individual on-site sewage systems.
3. The Trentwood Irrigation District Number 3 states the subject
is within the District's service area and that water is available
for domestic, fire protection and irrigation use upon completion
of contractual agreements. We recommend all such agreements be
completed prior to signing the final plat.
psp
' `:bmcc : Gordon W. Curry
E. 9209 Trent Road
Spokane, 6Vashington 99206
SCHD-ADM-118
~
E CpG SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1~ Inter-Of f ice Communication
h ~ -
Date: October 7, 1976
q~ j y 0\51 /
✓
T0: Sokane Count b4z;nn
FROM: ~
Dennis Kroll 7z,
SUBJECT: Curxy Two - Revised Octoher S 147A
The lot changes shown will not affect any prior approvals granted for the
suitability of individual wastewater systems on each lot.
I~~
psb RECIE
flCl' ? ~
X'~~~ • ' t
(~LOW~'~-t !1~
SCHD-ADM-030
OFf ICE Of THE -
SPOKANE COUOVTY PLANNING D
EPARTMENT
Date January S ~ t9 77
To File, PE-1023A-76 (Curry Two Subdivision)
r
From _Thomas G. Mosher, Planner
Subject SEPA Compliance.~ ~
Examination of this file on 1/4/77 revealed an administrative oversight in that
neither a"formal" proposed or final declaration of non-significance has been
is sued .
However, the file contains sufficient documenation that SEPA has been addressed
and fully considered, and, furthermore, that there was never any question about
the intent of the staff and Board of County Commissioners to issue the pe6}t~e
threshold determination. na~,~.++vq
Specifically: ,
* An environmental checklist was filed by the applicant for the original
proposal (PE-1023-76).
* A staff review recommended issuance of a decdaration of non-significance.
* Such a declaration was prepared and is in the file but was never signed
because of the ensuing appeal.
* Wlzen the plat was turned down by the Board in appeal (for density
reasons), it was resubmitted to the Planning Commission with 1/3 less
density. A new environmental checklist was submitted by the applicant.
* The staff review again recommended a declaration of nonsignificance,
but the Planning Commission again turned the plat down. However, no
adverse environmental conditions or reasons were raised to question the
validity of the recomanended threshold determination. The decision was
appealed to the Board by the applicant.
* The Board found in favor of the applicant and stated in their December 9,
19761 "Findings and Order" (No. 76-1195) that it had fully considered
the records and minutes of the Planning Commission, the
environmental assessment, . . . " .
* The above-referenced assessment recommended issuance of a declaration
of non-significance. Consequently, inherent witY6e Board's decision
to approve the plat was their intention to issue, as Responsible Official,
the proposed and final declarations of non-sigrfficance.
The Planning Department administratively errored in not preparing these documents
for the Chairman of the Board to sign. ConsequenCly, these documents are Co be
issued immediately in accordance with the Spokane County Environmentl Ordinance,
. . 11.15.340. . TGM:cmw -
cc: Mr, jerry Neal -
C pG ~ .
y r~ ~ ►.POKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT . ,
Inter-Offi ce Communi cation
!y p~ ~
Date: March 10, 1977
TO :
FROM: F
SUBJECT: pROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT--CURRY TWO
A. Individual subsurface disposal sewage systems have been proposed for treatment .
and disposal of secaage generated within the project. This raises the question-
. of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible al-
ternatives for sewage disposal.
B. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study*, Dr. Todd Considered
typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the
' effect of continued urban development. in the Spokane River Valley upon the
quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that:
(1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment ef-
fluent does reach and recharge the groundwater.
(2) "The estimated quanity of leachate reaching the groundwater is sufficient
• to transport all the dissolved salts downward with no accumulation in the
soil. Therefore, the entire dissolved solids content of the septic tank
effluents should be reaching the groun-dwater,except for minor dissolved
constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil
particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots."
(3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of a groundwater flow line
indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration ex-
pected at present (1975) is up to 93mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the
natural groundwater background of 155mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum
incremental concentration is 101mg/1 above the natural background." -
"The analytical results of the forecast impact at year 2020 when compared
with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and
dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on ground-
caater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level."
C. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the
groundwater as in the range of 0.3 to ~.0 ppm. A proj'ected incrementai increase
usino Dr. Todd's e-pected 8.6 percent would result in ranges from 0.3' to
4,09-ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm.
(v.5o
D. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have
the following general characteristics:
(1) Collector and central treatnent systems discharging to surtace waters would
require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for
the discharge from the Department of Ecology. 1"hese systems are not currently
economically available for this project.
SCHD-ADM-118
.
-s -
Page 2 -
Aiarch 10, 19 7 7 ~ " . (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for
liquid removal. These systems requfre more land area than a
conventional subsurface drainfield. Some such as lagoons, have safety
hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance.
Land, installation and operational costs are generally more expensive than
those for septic tanks and drainfields.
(3) Special disposal systems using various methods of irrigation or using evapo-
transpiration have had insufficient use in this area to validate design
criteria. Irrigation requires effluent disinfection in most cases. These
systems also require relatively large areas for year around operation.
Land and some operational costs are more than those for septic tanks and
drainfields. Again, without a specific additional treatment to remove
dissolved solids or completely sealing the.disposal area from percolation,
some dissolved salts will be carried with effluent recharge to the ground-
water.
E. Historically, urban density developement has resulted in polluted groundwater
beneath the development and in increased values of land to such an extent that
space for individual secaage disposal drainfields is too expensive for that use.
F. Conclusion: . .
(1) The use of subsurface sewage disposal systems for this project will have
a negligible impact on the water quality at this time.
(2) The development of this project in conjunction with other surrounding
urbanizing project can be eapected ultimately to have at least a moderate
impact on the water quality. '
* THE EFFECT OF APPLIED SURFACE WATERS ON GROUND [aATER QUALITY IN THE SPOKANE
VALLEY. David K. Todd, Section 608 tJater Resources Study - Metropolitan
Spokane, Region, Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, Seattle District,
April 7, 1975.
p lm
"-Q
ED
E~
1 ~ ~g11
MpR
. pNE CD~N MEN~
spp pEQ ARJ
P~~MN
A
ONUTES
Ll L__3 J -
4CTOBER 8, 1976
PP,ELI1VIINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSII'ICATIGN UPGRA.DING
PE-1023A-76 CURRY TWO ADDITION (Revised): CURRY
ZE- 75-76 AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1)
Planning Commission Recommendation: Deny. (On motion for approval, the vote
wa s one for and four against.)
A. REASONS:
1. That the plat a s designed would be unappropriate for the area.
2. That acre or larger tracts would be a more appropriate lifestyle.
B. BACKCRC UiVD
Curry Two Subdivision was orfginally heard by the Planning Commission on
july 9, 1976. The proposal at that time czlled for the subdivision of about .
8.7 acres of land into 24 lats for single farnily (22 lots) and duplex (2 lots)
use creating a gross density of about three (3) units per acre. Planning
Commission decision was for denial, '
Reasons given for denial by the Planning Commission were as follows:
a. "The residential density proposed by the sponsor is considerably
higher than that of the existing density in the surrounding area.
b e It was felt by the Planning Commis =ion that the updating of the
Comprehensive Plan would morE appropriately determine the
density for the area. "
It should be noted, however, that the Planning Commission decision expressed
no policy guidelines for the staff to follow; i. e., what would be aa appropriate
density.
The sponsor, Gordon W. Curry, subsequently appealed the Planning Commis-
sion decision to the Board of County Commissioners. The Board conducted a
special hearing on the proposal August 12, 1976. The Commissioners decision
of Augus< 26, 1976, upheld the Planning Commission recommendation of
july 9, 1976.
The present proposal calls far the subdivision of about 8. 7 acres of land into
16 lots for single family use creating a gross density of approximately 2 units
per acrE (a reduction of 1/2 from the original proposal) .
-1-
•
r' -
STAFF REC4-'er,,b PVIENDATION
,
4
PRELIMINAF<Y SUBDIVISION AND ZON£ CLASSIFICATION UPGRADIr1G
PE- I023A-76 CURRY. TW0 ADDITION (Re.vlsed): CURRY
ZE- 75-76 AGRICULTURAL TO SINGL:E FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 'R-1)
BACKGROUND:
Curry Two Subdivlsion was origlnally heacd by the Planning Commission
on july 9, 1976. The proposal at that time called for the subdlvision of
about 8.7 acres of land into 24 lots for singZe family (22 lots) and duplex
(Z lots) use creating a qross density of about three (3) units per acre.
Planning Commission decision was for denlal.
Reasons given for denial by the Planning Commisslon were as follows:
A. "Tha residenttal denstty pcoposed by the sponsoris consider-
ably higher than that of the existing density in the surroun& -
ing area.
B. It was felt by the Planning Commission that the updatinq of
the Comprehensive Plan would more approorlately determine
the density for the area." It should be noted, however, that the Planning Commission deciston
expressed no policy guidelines for the staff to follow l.e., what would be
an appropriate density.
The sponsor, Gordon W. Curry, subsEquetttly appealed the Planning Commission decisfon to th4 Board of County Commissioners. The Board
conducted a special hearing bn the proposal August 12, 1976. The
Commisstoners dectsion of August 26, 1970, upheid the Planning Commis-
sion recommendation of july 9, 1976.
The present proposal calls for the subdivision of about 8.7 acres of
land into 16 lots forsi`ngle family use creating a gross densfty of
approximately 2 units per acre ( a reductlon of I/3 from the original
proposal).
Planning Staff Recommendation: Approve, PE-I023A-76, Currv Two Addition
(Exhibit B), subject to the followtng conditions:
A. CC)IVDITIONS:
1. That the plat be destgaed as indicated :-n the preliminary plai of
record and/or attached sheets as noted.
. ~1-
. . .
PE-1023A-76 CURRY TW0 ADDITION (Revised) (Continued)
2. That a statement be placed in the dedfcation to the effact that no
more than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor
sha11 any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating
additional lots or building sites without filing a replat.
3. That the plat provide for right of way wldth for streets as indicated
on the prelicninary plat of record.
4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described
property be held in trust untll the continuation of the streets be
dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of aIl streets
that termfnate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs
are required when streets terminate at the plat boundarfes.)
5. That appropriate street names be indlcated.
6. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the
approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Depart-
ment and the utility companies. V}Iritten approval of the easements
hy the utility company must be received prior to the submittal of the
final plat.
7. That a plan for water facilittES adequate for fire protection be •approved by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said
water plan must also have been approved by the appropriate
health authoritles. The health authorities, water supplter (purveyor),
and fire protection district wl11 certlfy, prior to the filinq of the
final plat, on the face of said water plan that the p.lan f s in confor-
mance with their requirements and wfll adequately satisfy their
respectfve needs. Said water plan and certificatfon will be drafted
on a transparency suitable for repcoductfon.
The water supplier (purveyor) will also certify prior to the filing of
the final piat on a copy of said water plan that approprfate contractual
arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for constructivn
- of Ghe water s.ystem, .in accordance 'with ttne approved plan, and in
accordance with a time schedule. The. time schedule wfll provide,
in any case, for completion of the water systom and tnspection by
the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building
permlts within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include
a provision holdtng Spokane County and the water suppller (purveyor)
harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a bufldfng permit
due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the
approved water system.
The plat dedicatlon will contain a statcment to the effect that the
public water system as approved by County and State Hea1fh
- la -
PE-1023,A-76 CURRY TW0 ADDITION (Reviszd) (Continued)
authorittes and the local firc di strict and water supplier (purveyor)
wfll be installed within thfs plat, and the subdivider will provide
for individual domestic water seivLce as weil as fire protectfon to
each lot prior to sale of each lot.
NOTE: The Spokane County Health District has determined that the
soil condttions in the plat are suitable for on-site sewage
dlsposal systems on each lot.
a. That a certificate of title be furntshed the Planning Department prior
to the filing of the final plat.
, g. That the prellminary plat be given condittonal approval to
. November 1, 1977.
10. That streets be improved to standards establf shed by Spokane
County or a.. bond to cover the cost of such Lmprovements be
furnfshed the County Engineer. The bond may also cover the cost
of "as built" plans, englneering costs, and placing of the final
center line monuments.
lx. That proflles of streets, cross sections, proposed grades, and
drainage plan of the plat be submitted and approved by the County
Engineer and by the Planning Director b4fare the final plat fs drawn. -
Prior to acceptance of the improvements or release of bonds, a
certiftcate by a registered civfl engineer or llcensed Zand surveyor
will be required indfcating that all improvements have been installed
to the lines and grades shown on the approved const ructfon plans.
12. Conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication
of the rfght of way to the public and approval of the road system in
the plat by the County Engineer, and that ten feet of additional
rfght of way be provided on 1VicDonald Road as shown on the Prelimi-
nary plat of record, and that indi'viduai lot access to McDonald
Road be prohibited.
13. That a name be indicated before the final plat ls flled; such name
to be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff,
B. STAFF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
A s required in WAC 197- 10- 320, the staff of the County Pla nning
8~po.rtment reviewed the environmental checkltst submitted by IVIr. Gordon
CurYy for a preliminary subdivision of Curry Two (Revlsed). The proposal
is located approximately in the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 34,
Township 26 Iv'., Range 44 E.W.M. just west of and fronting McI?onald
Road, about 1200 feet north of 'V11'ellesley Avenue. The proponent requests
to subdivide approximatcly 8.7 acres of tand into 16 singie famfly loes,
-1 b-
. PE-1023A-76 CURRY TWO ADDInON (revised) (Continued)
thereby creating a gross donslty of about 1.8 units per acro, The site f s
located on relatively flat to moderate steep (11% slope) terraf n currently
covered by productive pasture vegetation.
The staff revlew ha s identified four potenttal area s of environmental impacts.
Ffrst, and common to all subdivisions, is the increase fn motor vehicle
traffic and all the effects associated therewith. These would include such
fmpacts as Increased air pollution, specifically suspended particulates from
unimproved streets, increased noise, and increased public safety hazards
from traffic. .
A second potential environmental impact area considered was the increased
_ demand on publ.ic services and utllities. This would include such factors
, n ~-as increased requirements for police and firc protection, provision of
. additional school, park, and recreattonal facilities, and additional mainten-
ance requirement5 on all county facilities and roads. This wwld also
includc such impacts as associated with extension of utility lines
(po4ver, natural gas, telephone) and the provision of suitable long term
sewerage, domestic water, storm water runoff, and solid waste disposal
systems.
A third potential environmental impact revealed by the staff evaluation
involves the subsurface injection of sewage effluent and storm water
runoff. This waste water placed at a depth will percolate downward toward
the aquifer rather than evaporating back tnto the atmosphere as under
natural conditions. A portion of the contamfnants will likely be filtered
out of thfs waste water, but the resulting quality has not been determined
yet. A total of about five (5) acre-feet pcr year of waste water will be
generated by this proposal, three (3) acre-feet of which will lfkely be
sewage effluent.
The final potential area of environmental impact is the transitfon of land
from an active agricultural use to suburban residential. The 8.7 aere
sfte is currecitly used as pasture grazing la•nd but the proposal will change
this to single family use at a gross density of 1.8 units per acre.
The conclusion of this environmental checklist review is that no signifi-
cant envlronmental tmpacts will likely result from the proposal. Therefore,
it is recommended that a Declaratfon of Non-Significance be issued and
and environmental impact statement not be required.
C. Z ONTNG RECOMMENDATION:
Planning Commission Recommendation: Approve Currv Two Addition (Revised) as
indicated on the prelfminary plat of record fio the Single Family Residential (R-1)
Zone Classffication upon filinQ of the final plat.
-lc-
. PE-102 3A-?6 CURRY Z'V':~ a ADDITIaN (Revised) (Continued)
RF.ASONS:
1. The 16 lots in Curry Two Addition (Revtsed) have been desfgned to
accommodate singe famlly resfdences; i.e., groas densfty of
2 units per acre.(A reduction of a thtrd from thf ~ original proposal.)
2. The Planning Commfssion has upgraded simllar Sized lot developments
in the Trentwood and W'est Farms Communlty to the Single Fami3y
Residential Zone; i.e., Curry One Additton and the Eva Addition.
3. The Single Family Residential Zone prohibits duplexes, animal keep-
ing other than household pets, mobtle homes, and home occupntions.
- 1 d-
PE-1023A-76 - CURRY TVe ADDITION -~~ontinued
.
.
C . GENERAL DATA:
.
1. L-Dcation: Section 341 Township 26 N., Range 44,
E.WaM. The S 539.3 ft of N 1650.2 ft
of that portion of SW 1/4 of Sect. 34 lyg Eof a Ln drawn from a pt .
in the N ln of sd SW 1/4 , 1578 . 6 ft E of NW corner thence to pt in
S ln of sd SW 1/4 1579.2 ft E of SVV corner thereof; exceFt S 179.76 ft
and except th3t portion lyg within 1vlcDonald Rd.
2. Sponsor: Gordon W. Curry
E. 9209 Trent Rd.
Spokane, WA 99206
3. Engineer: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc.
N. 909 Argonne Road
. Spokane, VIA 99206
4. Site Size: 3.7 acres
5. Number of Lots: 16 (A reduction of 8 lots from first submit-
ted plat)
6. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single Family dwellings
7. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established April 24, 1942
8. Advertised Zone Upgrading: Sing.le Family Residential (R-1)
9. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3
10. School District: East Valley School District
- 1 a -
♦ j 'w
CpG `
~
y r~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT "
Inter-Offi ce Communi cati on
Date: March 10, 1977
T0:
r
FROM:
SUBJECT: PROPOSED PRELIMINARY PLAT--CURRY TWO
A. Individual subsurface disposal sewage systems have been proposed for treatment
and disposal of sewage generated within the project. This raises the question
of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible al-
ternatives for sewage disposal.
B. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study*, Dr. Todd Considered
typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the
' effect of continued urban development_ in the Spokane River Valley upon the
quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that:
(1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment ef-
fluent does reach and recharge the groundwater.
(2) "The estimated quanity of leachate reaching the groundwater is sufficient
to transport all the dissolved salts downward with no accumulation in the
soil. Therefore, the entire dissolved solids content of the septic tank
effluents should be reaching the groun-dwater,except for minor dissolved
constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil
particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant raots.''
(3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of a groundwater flow line
indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration ex-
pected at present (1975) is up to 93mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the
natural groundwater background of 155mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum
incremental concentration is 101mg/1 above the natural background." -
"The analytical results of the forecast impact at year 2020 when compared
with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and
dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impacg on ground-
water quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level."
C. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the
groundwater as in the range of 0.3 to 1.0 ppm. A projected incremental increase
using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges f rom 0.31 to
1.09 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm.
D. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have
the following general characteristics: '
(1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would
require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for
the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently
economically available for this project.
SCHD-ADM-118
' F
~ ~Y
Page 2
March 10, 1977
(2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for
liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a
convenzional subsurface drainfield. Some such as lagoons, have safety
hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance.
Land, installation and operational costs are generally more expensive than
those for septic tanks and drainfields.
(3) Special disposal systems using various methods of irrigation or using evapo-
transpiration have had insufficient use in this area to validate design
criteria. Irrigation requires effluent disinfection in most cases. These
systems also require relatively large areas for year around operation.
Land and some operational costs are more than those for septic tanks and
drainfields. Again, without a specific additional treatment to remove
dissolved solids or completely sealing the disposal area from percolation,
some dissolved salts will be carried with effluent recharge to the ground-
water.
E. Historically, urban density developement has resulted in polluted groundwater
beneath the development and in increased values of land to such an extent that
space for individual sewage disposal drainfields is too expensive for that use.
F. Conclusion:
(1) The use of subsurface sewage disposal systems for this project will have
a negligible impact on the water quality at this time.
(2) The developnent of this project in conjunction with other surrounding
urbanizing project can be expected ultimately to have at least a moderate
impact on the water quality.
* THE EFFECT OF APPLIED SURFACE WATERS ON GROUND WATER QUALITY IN THE SPOKANE
VALLEY. David K. Todd, Section 608 Water Resources Study - Metropolitan
Spokane, Region, Corps of Engineers, Department of the Army, Seattle District,
April 7, 1975.
Plm
~-C- ~ ~ !•c I'r ~
EID
c
ti
9 ~9~1
S~~ DEQ ~'R
P~ANN,
Assign Zoue Change ilumber . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..r
Affidavit of Posting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agenda Page . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agenda Page to staff for proofing and map
Agenda Pagz to Printer . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notice of Public Hearixig . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal P3otice to Newspaper . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Froperty Owner Notification . . . . . . . . . . . .
~
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Print Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AgFn-I:A' r=iri_i 1. F•~i ?.c . ( ~ c~ .•r-!- ,~F. . : i li~~ _ ~ )
. . . . . . . . . .
Land Surve9or. . . . . . . .
Property Owners . . . . . .
Hi ghway Depar tm en t.....
Utility Company. . . . . . .
School 13i strict . . . . . .
Fire District . . . . . . .
Sheriff's Department . . . .
County LibrarY • • • • • • -
.
~
;
~
.
.
. Ar .
~
,
.s-
7~W
• `y
~r• ~
1 ~
~
~ -
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
1
County of Spokane ss.
I, DOREEN V. TOHNSON, on oath depose and say that the attached
is a transcript prepared by me of the tape recording of the hearing held by
the Spokane County Planning Commission, July 9, 1976 and October 8, 1976.
Such transcript is true and correct insofar as I was able to interpret the voice s
as recorded.
~ , `/~...a Q
~
Doreen V. Johnson, Clerk Typist III
Spokane County Planning Department
t
Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of
. ~
197~.~.
Notary Public in and for the State of
VVashington, residing at Spokane,
'VVashington.
My commi s sion expire s
~ ~
SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
. July 9, 1976
Members present: Francis Schadegg, Glen Quigley, Ted McCouryo
SCHADEGG:
We will pgoceed lwith the next item on the Agenda, which is PE 1023-76, Curry 2,
, Curry .2nd Addition, I guess, would you proceed with it, John?
NUNNERY: PE-1023--by Gordon Curry is located on the west side of McDonald Road
about 1200 feet north of Wellesley which is, here s Wellesley and McDonald right
here. It is mostly flat terrain with an 119o slope on the west this is the design...
here s the slope ar•ea going down from the northwest. Mr. Curry is requesting to
subdivide 8.7 acres into 24 lots, creating a gross density of 3 units per acre,
for single-family dwellings and requesting 2 duplexes on the west end, on Lots,
I believe, 2 and 3, Block 3. Staff recommends approval of the design and upgrading
V
of the Agricultural Zone to R-1 on1y, subject to the standard conditions and
special condition on Page 5(b) Item 12, which calls for an additional 10 feet of
right of way to be dedicated on the east side of McDonald Rd, as indicated right
here. The reasons for the Staff not recommending R-2 for duplexes axe listed on
5(d), Item l, and as before, has to do with no primary secondary arterials and not
at the edge of a proposed residential neighborhood. We also recommend that a
Declaration of Non-Significance be issued. Any questions?
SCHADEGG: Any questions fs om the Commission? Thank you. Is the applicant or
kis representative here? CURRY: I~m Gordon Curry. My business is at 9209 E Trent.We've got this area that
we're attempting to get platted for some 24 homes. As you notice on the map here,
it indicates other developments. This area has been a real slow area developed over ,
the years, and I'm sure there:s a lot of bigger areas out there that are going to be
developed here in the next few years. The East Valley School Districtj Can use a lqt of
good students there, I'm sure, it's a smaller district and it should help provide
some real good homes. We've dug several homes in the area out there, and they've
al1 been real good homes. The reason I even put in for an R-2 zoning rating
was that there just aren't many duplex sites in the area out there. You can drive
through the area, and you just don7t run into too many duplex lots out there for
double family livzng. The Zoning Commission says that they would like to have it
all single family, and if this is what you see fit, why, we'll go this route without
any problems. I'd like to say we just added the double, R-2 in there, because there
aren't many in the area. Are there any questions?
SOHADEGG: Are there any questions of the Commission? Thank you.
CURRY: Okay.
SCHADEGG: Is there anyone here who would like to speak in favor of the proposal?
Alright. I'm going to announce in opposition to begin with, we received the petition
of a number of property owners who are in opposition to changing the zoning from
Agricultural to either Single-Family or Two-Family Residential and apparently, they
don't really make it clear whether they oppose both the subdivision and the zoning °
or just one of the two. But they give reasons, and it's signed by almost three pages
of names. We'll submit this and accept it as part of the record . Anyone else who
would like to sit here in opposition, would you come forward please and state your
name and address for the record. DAN McINEARY:: Dan McIneary, I live at N 5206 McDonald Rd, directly opposite the
proposed plot plan of Curry 2. And in station our oppositions to the development of
this area, I would like to reinerate a couple of points that we have here on the, our,
petition, and we're strongly represented by the property owners there in the area.
SCHADEGG: You're speaking for all of them, are you sir?
NtcINEARY: Generally, but if they have something to say,-they are entitled to it as
:Par as I hope. -tiAs far as a couple of things that Mr. Curry brought up, I'm affiliated
with the East Valley School District and know some of the people out in that area who
are al so affiliated with it. He recommended that it wouldn't have any impact on the
East Valley School District wgll we can see with the levies that we iust recently .
passed that cut into our pocket, and a proposal f or a development of new schools with
b
2 .
the over-taxation of new students in this area, the impact of new students of the
development of this area is going to be critical, not only in the housing and schooling
of the students but transportation. I am directly involved with transportation of the
schools. Also, as the point was brought up, in this area he says it is a slow
development area, well, if you can, most people can foresee that the livelihood of
the people that reside in this area and I mean they make a living on it in most
generalities, that's why it's a slow developing area, because it is dedicated in
agricultural and this is wh.ere they make the money at, it's from the use of that land,
and that's why we have a slow developing area in there, it's not intended purposes for
tract type or developed area to put that many homes on it. We, as home owners out
there, live on property acre plus in this area and up to 40 acres per unit out there.
.
So I°d like to bring that in, and the question was arised by the Board is that,,it
wasn't too clear on here, yes, we are against the re-zoning of the area and also
against the single or, and/or double family dwelling in the area. We are against both
the zoning and the developing. .
SCHADEGG: The question, Sir, was whether you were against the sub-division.
McINEARY: Yes we are against the subdivision, that is correct. Another item on the
petition is that we would like to bring up is, on the McDonald Road where it comes up
to Welle sley, that is a secondary arterial road going through there and the tractability
on this road is, with this development in here, is going to be prohibited, I mean
you're talking safety wise for the residents on the immediate area al so. Also to,
in conjunction with this, there is also another plat plan proposed, I believe it's
Item 12, th at was just down the street from, called the Clark Sub-Division that will
also throw another impact of residential re-zoning into this area iqhich werez,
consolodating possibly two sub-divisions in one small general area. And again I'm
speaking in conjunction with both of them. In closing, we'd like to present it to
the Board and in your favor, on your consideration, for our homes and our school district
and the people who ar e paying taxes and supporting community, tioe would like to see it
, 3
, disapproved. Thank you. "
SCHADECG: Is there anybody else who has something new in opposition or b:zst
concurrences...... ? Yes Ma'am?
I would like to say that a11 who signed that petition a1 so.......? SCHADEGG: Okay, thank you.
.HEGE: Glark Hege, 510 W Sprague, I'm involved in Petition No. 12 in so much as they're
talking about both of them. I did have a.... I would like to determine whether the
gentleman from the school di strict was speaking on behalf of himself or the school
district. He didn't say.
SCHADEGG: Yes, sir, were you speaY2king on behalf of yourself or the people who you
may or may not represent or of the school district?
McINEARY: I'm speaking on my behalf as a taxpayer in the area and prior knowledge of
the impact of development in the vicinity.
SCHADEGG: You were not official spokesman for McINEARY: I am not speaking for the School District.
SCHADEGG: Thank you. Is there any other question? Yes sir?
TESTER: My name is Ted Tester and I live, reside at 5225 N McDonald. I came to this
area and I like it there, I like it as it stands and as it is an agricultural area,
and when they say upgrading that real'ly brings-up that, you pick with this air that I
have, or ire, and as for misrepresentation, Mr. Catalo and myself and the neighbors
have been misrepresented th_ere, because the gentleman originally owing the property
said that he would not sell any of the property to a promotion of this kind. Therefore,
we spent considerable money in buying homes there that are worth a considerable amount;
myself a heart victim and I can't put up with too much of this sort of thing. However,
it's an improper'.vse of land and I think it reverts back to what England had to do,
if you have farm land, you farm that land, if you don't want to farm it, then you sell
it to someone that would like to farm it, and as a result in this cointry we are going
to have to come to that ana as in our neighborhood, most of the people, I would say,
4
all of the people, that I know around there, raise cattle, pigs, horses, and so
forth as part of their or their entire livelihood, and we are represented in this
petition by people who surround this property also in juxtaposition to the other piece
of property th at i s being proposed. Environment & ecology we see then in this factor
that that would disrupt the entire area that we live in, in which we so much desire
stays at it is. Intrusion is bringing into the nice agricultural area, and if you
don't like the smell of horse manure or cow manure , stay clear out. I say this
simply because if we bring in this sort of development in our area, these people
will petition against myself, against my neighbor s, and those that are actually making
an entire living from this sort of agriculture. Water system has not been approached
yet and they cannot put a water system down through this ar-ea with a dead end must
be a circulartory system and we are already short in water pressure in this area
. `
which would again impose an additional cost to the Water Department, water pressure
and such as that. Myself, I have the grotind that is in the lower area, considerably
lower, and on that side I would catch the brunt of any leakage of sewage put in there
uy this sort of a thing. And as Mr. Curry stated to me that he was going to fill
this backside, then he must put in a retaining wa11 on the line so that this must be,
not interfere with my propertye Mr. Catalo and myself again have been very much
misrepresented in the purchasing of this land vahich has been a considerable mis-
understanding. We have spent money rn,developing, we have spent money, considerable
amo:;Ln.t of money in purchasing and we would like to keep this as well as the rest of
our neighbors and I know that there are several here that would like to add to what
I-have had to say. Thank you.
SCHADEGG: Thank you. Are you speaking in opposition to the request, Mr. Cameron?
CAMERON: No, Mr. Schadegg - I'd like to b-ring a point of order, please, if I may.
SCHADEGG: Yes.
CAMERON: If we're going to discuss Item 12 in any manner at this time, I think there
ought to be an official presentation and at lEast let'-s bring forth the Land'Use map
5
These people are comparing apples and oranges as to what's occurring north of Wellesley
and what's occurring south of Wellesley.
SCHADEGG: Yes, I was about to get to that if we'r'e going to pursue that any longer,
but in the meantime we're to others that had something new to add in the way of
testimony and please just don't repeat what h as already been said, if you want to
concur, that's fine. Yes Ma'am?
LADY:_' I have a question on a road. He said that we have another road, where is
that other road?
SCHADEGG: Would'you point to that please, J;ohn?
IVTu"NNERY : Can you see thi s here?
LADY: I'm sorr.y, no. '
NUNNERY: I can't move the map, sorry.
LADY We're all interested in we have the understanding that there was only one
road and the other was a priuate easement.
IVUNIVERY: This would be a public.... road headed west right through the center of
this parcel which~, is just.....
which comes west side of MacDonald there...
NUNNERY: Yes, this is MacDonald right here; this is the new proposed road.
That would be the only access road off MacDonald to the development area.
NUNNERY: At the present time. LADY: So MacDonald Road is the only way that they can get to the 24.11-ouses...
NUNNFRY : Ye s .
LADY: 48 cars ..one road.
NUNNERY: If the Commission (incoherent)
SCHADEGG: Did you ask a question Sir, I didn't quite hear you.
Yes, are you aware of the
SCHADEGG: We haven't been told that yet, no. Thank you. And there is one other
question that was raised and this has to do with water facilities and the sewage and the - 6
cost of regula-tion of these things comes under the Health Department and one of the
conditions is that the proper approvals must be submitted including the adequacy of
the water supplier of the fire protection that would be available in the district. Imean these things are provided for in the conditions, they're part of the standard
conditions and we haven't been reading the whole two or three pages out of each
time, because they are standard , but if you do have questions: if you will direct them
to us, we will certainly read whatever we have to for you9 Would you like to point
to the question that Mr. Cameron rai sed abbut the nature of the development of the
Land Use map in the axea north and south of Wellesley.
NUNNERY: As far as the other plat is concerned...
SCHADEGG: As far as this plat is concerned, you're talking about this one, are you
not?
NUNNERY: Yes.
CAMERON: I was referring to the reference that they're making as far as development that
has previously been heard north of 4Jellesley and south of Wellesley and we were being
brought into it when Item 12 was not on the Agenda.
SCHADEGG: I see what you ...I'm sorry.
CAMERON: Now if you wi sh to handle Item 12 immediately afterwards or at the same time
then we can make this comparison of the Land Use map between the two applications,
that's my point.
• SCHADEGG: I see, I didn't get the point clearly. item, there has been no move
to change the order of the agenda, so it is not part of the discussion.
I have a question, what kind of sewage do they plan on using...
SCHADEGG: Septic tanks and the approval of the septic tanks is subject, I should say
the use of the septic tanks and the u se of the lots for them is subject to the approval
of the Health Department which does regulate where you put them and whether they are
in they are in the prof)er soil to function properly.
Yes Sir.
7
I have one more question I would like to ask in reference to that easement
through there..... 16 ft. easement.
SCHADEGG: I didn't hear records for the easement
and this is an old,old easement, back in...
SCHADEGG: Would you like to adress that, John?
IVUNNERY: Easement into the plat?
SCHA,DEGG : There i s none that I know o f.
NUNNERY: There is none; he's proposing to dedicate a 50 foot right of way to the
County A s shown in this yellow..
LADY: ...through that only property?
NUNNERY: Yes. Will there be any on the existing County road nour to get to the dedication of
the new street, will there be any property that will have to go east of that to improve
that road /.Wl~1ra~fic is going on?
SCHADEGG: You're still talking about an additional dedication of land on the east
side of the r oad
On the east side of town...
SCHADEGG: At this time it's not requested, no.
CURRY: I'd like to ..-..that is Wellesley north, that is agravel road?
SCHADEGG: hTes.
CURRY: ....a road and it does dead-end on the next street ....and this traffic going
there again would be an unbrearable expense to this one party just south of that because
5 acres
SCHADEGG: Yes, we appreciate that. Were there further questions rel ative to this item?
You have a question sir?
MAN: The water district has approved the wather for this area ....dead end because we
put a hydrant on the far end which would make .....that it could be drained
The road, the gravel road is gravelled from Wellesley right straight north, it doesn't
8 •
dead end there, it goes down, picks up a road and goes east back around the other piece,
so it's not a dead end there. The dedicated road into the plat would be right after
,
County specifications as maintained by the County, so these things ar e items that should
be brought up.
SCHADE)GG: Yes, if there are no further questions relevant to this item, we'll recess
for about--- an hour and 15 minutes for lunch, and we'll resume again about a quarter to
two.
End of first tape on this session
Next tape.... October 8, 1976
RAWLIIVGS: First item is PE-1023A-76 Curry Two Addition that was heard in July and has
been revised since then. Bob if you'l1 give us the next...
BETHARDS: OK. PE-1023A-76, Curry Two Subdivision i s proposed by Gordon Curry is
located west of MacDonald and about 1,000 ft. north of Wellesley..... MacDonald's here,
Wellesley here, MacDonald and Wellesley there, and it's in the north central area in
the valley. The site is mostly factory, inactive pasture land and vegetation and
westerly edge of the site there's some 119b slope. Curry Rio Subdzvision was originally
heard at the July '76 heaxing by the Planning Commission . A proposal at that time
aalled for 24 lots on the 8.e7 acres with the gross density of 3 units per acre. The
Planning Commission decision at that time, which is upheld by the Board,was for a denial.
It was denied basically because of density. The original proposal as shown here. Mr.
Curry has since resubmitted his proposal, he now asked for a 16 single-family site on
the 8.7 acre site, he has reduced the density by a third, it's shown here. Staff
recommends approval of Exhibit B which is this one here, with following special
conditions plus the standard conditions that an additional 10 feet of right of way
be dedicated to the County and that access be given to McDonald Rd. fromthe individual
lots. Staff further recommends upgrade from the Agricultural Zone to the R-1 Zone
and Staff further recommends that a declaration, a preliminary declaration of non-
significance be issued . (Incoherent) '
~
R.AOLING5: There are some seats in the front row here, I'm sorry the acoustics with
the pillars in this room are very difficult . You see .....is represented here.
Give your name and address for the record, Mr. Curry and any comments you have.
CURRY: I'm Gordon Curry, Address: 8209 E Trent. Can you see this alright from here?
RAWLINGS: Yes, or ti•re can ,
CURRY: Thank you. The original plat was approved by the at 24 lots but the
density felt, that you people felt was too great so we reduced the number of lots
from 24 to 16 and this gives really a great size lot which could be about 1/2 acre
in zize. The area is in blue I notice there, the areas that re platted throughout the
east valley there, the school's in green as you notice there, so it's real_lZandy for
schools, the lots now would become in size of 134 in width by 154 and 155 in depth.
This gives you a 1/2 acre lot which I feel is really in accordance with the area.
We did a little research in the platting that has been taking place in the last
eeveral years - in 1974, now I'm going to read you statistics there, of lots, of
plats that have been approved in the valley area, not in the north or the south.
In 1974 there were 16 plats approved with 109 lots on 42 acres:,.or 2.5 lot per acre
ratim; in 1975 there i,rere 14 plats approved, 196 lots on 87 acres or 2.2 lots per acre
and so far in 1976 there's been 23 plats approved, 629 lots on 313 acres or 2.1 lots
per acre. So we're not asking gor anything that's unusual, the area that we're
attempting to relocate in and build in is an area that hasn't been developed in the
last several years because of the situation lying where it is , there are a lot of,
if you notice the black area, there are a lot of large land owners in this area holding
many acres , upto 200 acres individual s, and this is a situation that comes in areas
where people hold large size pieces of property until such time as they become old
retire or decide to sell or the family decides the value of the property has escalated
or depreciated to the point where they can't afford to farm it anymore, and so I think
it's just a matter of time until this area in the larger portions will be developed
into lots and I'm sure that with the cost of developing nowadays they'l1 have to be
10
divided into lots other than acre or two acre lots. Il've got a, I don't know, I'm sure
most of you people ha ven't noticed, it's a Wa11 Street Journal article, it tells about
property in California, I'm not going to bother with reading the whole thing to you, but
it's a situation where when you have to reduce the amount of lot s to make the cost,
it increases the cost of the lot to the point where you're almost getting out of
proportion in your field, and I probably think this is our position in Washington or
Spokane area, we're not familiar with the cost of, a lot of us aren't, with-the cost of
land like in California where this article has to do, it tells you that doum there they
put a lot, plat of ground in say, 200 lots, and they have a_lottery, people have to
wait in line tuo or three days just to get a chance on buying these lots, and this is,
it's not here yet in Spokane, maybe it never will be in our area, I hope it doesn't,
but it's a thing that could happen just by making the cost of these lots so high that
it's a definite expense to the consumer, there's nobody else that can pay it if you put
a house on a lot that you could buy two yeaxs ago for $3000, that same house has increased
in value and the lots increased, now you're looking at the lot, maybe 4 or 5 or 6,000
and there's nobody that can pay for it except the consumer. I don't have any other
articles or any other information unless you have some questions. We've tried to comply
with the size by going in 1/2 acre lots and I think it will make a real good buy, it
there's any questions, I'll be glad to answer. Mr. McCoury, do you agree with the staff's recommendation on this?
McCOURY: Yes, I do, I do.
RAWLINGS: Any other questinns?
- 1KAN (in audience): Yes, how many large animals is around, is kept around your area
there, like horses and cattle.
CURRY: Well there's various portions of different people that have them, there's,
like across the road ther e's acre lots, there's 3 or 4 or 5 acre lots individuals across,
I don't believe they have any animals other than maybe a dog, or you know, other domestic
north
animals. Right next to the ,l. there' s a fellow that' s been usin.g the ground that has
horses,quite a number of them; to the south there's a man that butchers cattle and
11
0
processes them and he has quite a few cattle. Diere's larger areas ar.ound that have ,
quite a few numbers of cattle and horses.
RAWLINGS: Any other questions? I really appreciate you intending to work with the
ttaff on this to meet the Commission's concern.
CURRY: Thank you. ~
RAWLINGS: Anyone else who would like to be heard on this item? Would you give us
your name and address sir for the record?
JESTER: My name is Phil Jester, I live at N 5255 McDonald Road just adjacent to this
property . Gentlemen, I wish to convey to the Planning Commission for their thIDUghtfulness
and stand of responsibility that you've in your pre vious positions. We also wish to
oommend the County Commissioners their visitations to the area , observing the situa.tion
and receiving first hand information therefore holding the decision of the Planning
Commissi on aforesaid. However, gentlemen, it grieves us deeply to see this adverse
inva.tion: of our peaceful enlightening community, for the atmosphere to. those living
and earning and carrying on their work of life, this especially we're aware in fact that
this property can be sold in a manner satisfactory to the neighborhood and to the legal
vwners of the property in questi on. When I say property in questi on, I've received myself
a ca11 from a gentleman named Duet, in Moscow, Idaho, asking if this property was
available, he would like to put one home on it and we'ue had several other queries
' in the neighborhood about this iri this respect The legal owners promised myself
and other, several known families that he would not sell to a developer and that he would
not sell less than 3 plots. This comes our breach of contract, therefore may I
quote from Shakespeare "Be these themes no more believed, the
with us in double sense, they keep the word of promi se to our ears and,break it to our
hope _ Democracy i s every eager for a rapid progre ss and the only progre ss urhi ch can
~ be rapid is downhill" that's from Sir Damon Jean. This raised_to mind a fact that my property and that adjacent to the west will suffer sewer seepage; two-thirds of my
property, and I have a gentleman here that ha.s observed this, is sub-irrigated•
12
- from an area near the center of the property in question which 4 acres lies between
15 and 20 feet below this property, that's the back portion of mine. This would result
in contamination by servicing of human excretion therefore resulting in pungent neighborhood
odors, and useless and destroyed faster, also hindering the natural drainage through
those properties below out in this area, possibly contaminating useful and natural
waters located there. As soils are de.... human heal th, vitality and intelligence
go with them, quotation from Lewiston Therefore it is suggested by my colleagues
that an ecology study be made in this area ~prior to any decision. There's no wickedness
so wicked or deceptive we can never of all evil spirits brought in the world,
sincerity is the most dangerous has been proved. This area has forztered many highly
intellectual students and we recently had a promotion of approximately 3.2 million dollars
- to increase the schools due to added housing and to bring up the facilities as to what
is proper. This area as of•this year produced 4 crops and soft feed, hay and that sort
of thing. There axe 10 more persons raising cattle,10 or more persons raising cattle
which comprises over 100 head and from our backdoor the other day I counted 63 head
of cattle, and that's a considerable amount to judge the position of thi s area. There's
aaver 40 head of horses in the very close area th at this Children come to my
place to ride horses, no charge; one little lady fell off breaking her arm, there was
no family repercussion, The present neighborhood relationship is outstanding, I love
my present status, shooting is allowed with respect ior game birds and animals, therefore,
we cannot concur with the proposed allegations and proposals. I am hoping we can remember
those wise words "money is not required to buy one necessity of our soul." This we feel,
gentlemen, has a number of points and we respect the intelligence of each and every one here
if you would bear frith me I would like to read part of a quotation from John
Keaton who is perhaps one of the most interested persons today and yet coming from the
younger generations from the changing of times. These last decades 20th century, a new
world has been emerging. One see everywhere the evidence of this struggle of birth, the
misgry of frenzy and the old world died in pangs of suffering,destruction and death. Youth
is the center of whatever new world awaits us beyond the dark horizon. On the credit
13 _
side youth has fresh strength, new life and the ability to desire necessary change
and the courage to work toward such change. On the debit side youth lakcks the patience,
wisdom and humility that come only from practical experienceh°-Tove, work and knowledge,
this we credit youth Throughout the bloody histxy of earth, youth has been
thrown into private and public servitude, sacrificed as pawns in international chess
games flattened to mechanistic gears to fit the patterns of politics, cast out into the
conforming of rigid self-serving segments of society, constricted into the
6f military machines or imprisoned in mad houses or penal institutions abandoned and shattered. I still say youth is here the hope of earth and one last light of the world
and therefore these closing remarks are directed primarily to the young people of our
planet. I'm going to skip the rest, it all has a very good point but before you blindly follow this or that new leader, ask simple direct questions and demand
simple straightforward answers. What..... has he ever built a home with his own
two hands, worked a farm, raised healthy happy children or even healthy chickens or
is he merely another empty political windbag, a...... lowhard who does nothing except
condenm, ridicule and destroy? One does not erLlist the services of an architect on the
basis of his contempt, his ability to or to plant bombs in washrooms. One asks
of an architect especially a social architect - show me your concrete practical pl ans
for what you desire to build , let me examine the structures you have al ready created.
With that gentlemen, I al so would like to, I don't k~~ow whether Ruth G.... was able
to be here today or not, these are trying times for a number of people working who would
like to be here, but she made the statement to me that as long as her mother owns the
78 acres just north of us, and as long as she was the heir to tha.t property, and as long
as her son would live, this property would not be disposed of or divided up and this I
think I will conclude and think you for your kind and diligent attention.
RAWLINGS : Thank you. Anyone else ti,rho would like to be heard? Your name and address for
'm .
the record. I sorry again I overlooked you there.
LA.RSON: My name is Barbara Larson and I live at N 5120 MacDonald.directly across from
14
what is the plan. The first thing is that this is not in accordance to the people and
the property that's in the surrounding neighborhood. There are not lots in the neigh-
borhood, they are an acre plus and there are three small acre lots across from it, and
it is these smallest ones in the whole area, the rest go up to 60 and 70.acres. We
understand that this is a very slow devel oping area, we want it that way, we don't
want a million people and a million kids and mor e traffic, we like the neighborhood.
There are large animals surrounding the neighborhood north, south, east andrwest; we
have cows, we have chickens, we have horses, we have sheep and someone was going to
throw in a few pigs just to keep everybody else to know that we do have animal s around
there and there are pigs that~have been rai sed there. We aren't interested in what
happened in California, we don't want it to happen in our neighborhood. There is nothing
above north of Wellesley like ftt, down below fine, but keep it do1Aun there, we don't
want it there, we want our own private neighborhood, I know that sounds selfish, but if
there wasn't another place in the whole world that he could build his houses on, then
we could, we would have to probably give in to thi s but ftre are lots of lot s, and we
. •
feel that if you want to live that far from your neighbor on a lot, there is about 140,000
other lots in Spokane, the kind that they can build a house we dcan't want to
live that close to anybody. Also he's changed the situation maybe by decreasing one-third
but there are still too many residence that are going to go on that one road, there is '
one secondary dirt bumpy road, that is it; it goes right by our homes, there's no other
way to get into that prop:erty, only one secondary dirt road, that is it, and he may grant
easement but that's going through his proposed plan not any other road coming from any
other direction , but the one in front, that is it. And we have horses, and we have
hhildren and I can't_ imagine if 30 or 40 cars buzzing up. that road everyday, it won't be
save for anybody. Also we can't afford any more schools, any more children, it's coming
in we know that, but there's got to be a stop somewhere. We're overtaxed right now as far
as the schools. I happen to record, say something to you, I know it's maybe off the subject
but the other day my children came in the house overjoyed because a deer was in the front
. 15
yard and went across the road and had a drink, well if ure've got that many more people
here, the deer are gone. We have pheasant in the back yard, we have wild geese that run
in the pasture in the fall, we would never be able to see any more if there's that many
people ever going to move into it. There are people, they're making their living in the
neighborhood, just about a half a block up the road there's a dairy farm and the man
next to him is raising cattle-a1d we knour that if enough people get in there, they will
force these people to sell their animals because they already want to change the zoning
and they're going to change it further, so that we're going to be all pushed out, not
have our horses and these people are aot going to be able to lose their livelihood.
All I'm saying is then besides that they're going to force us to pay that road, we know .
this, because that road•could never handle additional traffic without being paved, so
who's going to get paid for it, we are, and the people, they're on the road and finishing
the road yet, the of the expense. .
RAWLINGS: Are you speaking of McDonald, Mrs. Larson?
LARSON: McDonald, yes. That is the road that will happen to be forced to be paved and
we the people that live on that road will the expense, because the other people
will be living on a different road going into the project so we will have to assume
all of that expense and believe me, we like tat bympy road, it slows people down to
at°_least 50 miles per hour,..5-- If it was paved, I'm afraid it'll be even worse. Right now
all of the people were all content, we had a shortage of water a11 summer, there's sometime
barely enough water the lawn, the pressure is what's gone. There's not enough in the
pumping station to handle all the water, because people are watering their pasture s,
there's a lot of irrigation there. Al1 I'm saying, is I'm speaking for a11 of us, we know
Mr. Curry wants his development, but we don't want it there, it is not in contention
with the neighborhood, it is tom many people for that amount of land and all we ask zs
that he reconsider lowering it to the surrounding area so that it's as equal to what
we have, we have no feelings against that, because we can't really have the land there.
So I hope that you'll take into consideration the dirt road and our feelings on it, please.
16
RAWLINGS: Thank you. Anyone else who would like to be heard on the-item? Can I see
a show of hands of those that support Mrs. Larson's position? Thank you. Before we
proceed........ Mr. Jester?
JESTER: Gentlemen, I have attested, and I'd like to make it.... and I think it's
brought to my attention that I said less than 3 plots. The-person holding this property
has promised to us that they would not sell it in plots less than 3 plots, that is, more
than 3 plots, what I mean that they would not br eak it up in 3 plots. Does this
clarify? I thank you kindly. _
RAWLINCzS: Mr. Praether, with the topography of this area as far as the Health District
is concerned do you see any problem with the on-site septic tanks as requested?
~
PRAETHER: I'm Gene Praether from the County Health District. This area meets all of
nur current re gulations for on=site disposa7., it's and gravity the slope areas
that are shown in this topographical area here run ax ound from 10-15/ and with these
size lots there should be no problem, we have no reason to anticipate any.
R,AWLINGS: Thank you, any other questions?
SCHADEGG: I would like to ask the staff about the water pressure, was that checked with
the..... what irrigation district is that?
RAWLIIVGS: Trentwood.
BETHARDS: We have a letter in the file that inadequate water and fire services
available.
RAWLIIVGS: Mr. Kennaly, from County Engineers - the road condition on McDonald and the
IDoad going into the plat - any comments on that? for the public to understand me.
KENNALY: No I think not. McDonald Road is the very minimum standard, typical gravel
County road about 20 foot wide, would be adequate to handle additional traffic as far
as the road characteristics. Of course there will be an increase of traffic, no
. question about it.
RA1nfLINGS : And the road going into the plat?
17
KENNALY: The road going into the plat would be ....30 ft. wide which would again
.
would enable the plat...... that type of road unless the developer
RAWLINGS: Thank you, any other questions?
: Mr. Kennaly is that 30 foot wide road, is that the right of way from one
iide of the street to the other or does that just include the road bend?
KENNALY: No sir, that would just be the road bend.......
RAWLIIVGS: Other questions from the Commission? Anyone else who would like to be heard
on this item? Mr. Curry?
CUR.RY: I just would like to clarify a point, this plat in no way would ref3:ect on any
&f the people that live in the area. The people that wanted cattle, the people that
wanted horses, you can keep whatever you've got now. I'm sure there'sLno regulations
in the Ordinance that I know of, that in vour typical zoning that you're doing right now
that you can't continue to do so. This has nothing to do with trying to force anybody
to get rid of their stock that they have now and I'm sure this wouldn't be done.
LADY IlV AUDIENCE: What about the houses. Are they going to downgrade our houses?Devalue
them?
CURRY: Brand new homes?
LADY: Sure. Why not? I've seen homes that were built ...10 years, they've
RAWLINGS: Keep your questions di rected through the chair, we'll see that they're answered,
let's not get an exchange going between
CURRY: That's all I had. -
RAWLINGS: Any other questions?
(In'coherent).......
RAWLINGS: 1Vow that is not a deci sion of this Commission but I think you can ask the
developer what financial class you anticipate to build.
CURRY: It's probably be anywhere from $36,000 to $42.000.
RAWLINGS : Ma' am, your name and address please for the record.
JOY: I'm Eileen Joy, I'm at 12307 E Wellesley and I want to know what this to us
tax wise, the more houses they're bringing in, the more ...(incoherent)
Next time there'll be another OK those who want to keep it this way, are we
going to be sitting there with actually our desirability of property going doVrn while
lR .
the property around us, more and more houses, are going up, and is this why cause
our taxes to be so high that we can'tafford to keep this piece of property.
RAWLINGS: Now,these determinations are made out of the Assessor's Office, and they
nndoubtedly, under the existing Washington State Zaw, the adjacent areas do affect the
way the assessed properties....
because eventually we won't be able to hang on to these acres because
. the taxes will be high we can't afford to pay them.
RAWLIIVGS: Thank you. Any comments from the Commission;'in that regard? There's no
further testimony then.
MOTION:
R.AWLINGS: First item is PE-1023A-76, Curry AdditionzlVo. 2 revised, is there a motion on
this item?
KAIN: ; Ms. Chairman I would like to move that the 1023A-76 and ZE-75-76 be
~
approved consistent with the staff recommendations.
RAWLINGS: It's a motion for approval to the•single-family residential zoning . Is
there a second? There's a11 second. As a second, any discussion on the item?
: incoherent...
RAWLINGS: I assume those houses right across McDonald ~
QUIGLEY: South of Wellesley now, these will be the first lots that arec_oming in
here that are 1/2 acre in size and the lots are really not consistent with the land
around the plats as I see it.
RAWLINGS: You mean south to Wellesley.
QUIGLEY: South to Wellesley..... What size are these..... all half acre in here...
what are these in here..?
RAWLINGS: Any other discussion here?
NicCOURY: I think that wilh all the farming that is going on and all the agricultural
pursuits and horses and cattle raising and so on,and I don't read any environmental
assessment here of the staff and I think there should be laxger lots, at least one
acre, to coincide with the rest of the neighborhood.
SHADEGG: This is in sense the way I feel, this is reducing the lot size substantially
.19 .
ove'r what surrounds it, the closest thing to it is an acre size lot there aren't too
many of those. I am wondering by my commen ts I second it to for discussion
R.AWLINGS: F'urther discussion on that?
QUIGLEY: Do you think it would be do oppose in favor of the 1 1/2 acre lots, that
we should give them a size that we would accept? SHADDEGG: I think we should indicate what we want , what we wish to think in terms
of size, I don't know whether we could clear ourselves discussion, ...size
to any particular size, I wouldn't be prepared to do that, but I would say certainly
an acre or above:~would be closer to what to what I would gladly ......1/2 acre because
a 1/2 acre is injecting a completely different flavor to the whole community.
NUNNERY: This staff would appreciat e knowing what the Planning Commission's idea
is of density in that area...
QUIGLEY: The only thing less than what's across the street .
R.AWLINGS:Further discussion? Those in favor of the motion say Aye,
MAIN : Aye
RAWLINGS: Opposed, No.
QUIGLEY, McCOURY, SHADEGG: No.
RAWLINGS: Motion fails.The application is denied.
McCOURY: Madam Chairman I think....... the staff should understand that the Commission
was in favor of at least an acre or more.
GO
A -
i ~ . r - . . ♦ , v • ~ ~ \ ~ -1 ti. A 1 ~ 1"'• .
" . 10 Spokane Daily Chronicle
- , - _ Wednesday, Ja.n. 5, 1977:
1
. . - . . _ : .
. County 010'-
Of, P~'ol. e~• .r -
~ - .4rn,
. ~ ' .y .
+ . .
Is•`~~. A~. .y ~a I e.. d.'
. : . c~ .
- _ ."te .tf ' AT
° . , ` The~Boardr:o~ County Com=: - - 'For example, he contends, - : missioners''~--approvaL: af- _ a the board was -givea "sub-.
contrmversial Spokane Valley ` stantial evidence" =that the:.
• ~ - ~ .y ; housing d'evelopment _ has . ~ - : _ smallest -DarcelL:-- of - ground 2. been appealed~ to-. Superior', withla a ."reasonable ° dis- .
, _ _ _ _ - _ ~ Court._ `tance" of.the plat is abont one - -
Judge.:*.WilliairirFJ: `.G"r"anti~ :-acre- in size, and the largest,
-Monday. signed'an order: ac- . parcel within a reasonable
:epting;` the•'a request,- for-:, a). ~ . distance is 96 acres: - - •
Superior C'ourt review•: of the ` The character of the area
' - commissioaers' action= • and -f _ Surrounding the proposed-de-,' .
directing that a record of pro7-?~ velopment-~ is rural and. ag-
. • ceedings held by the commis= - ° ricultural, in conflict with the .
sioners be submitted-. La the - half-acre lots Curry ProPoses.-;
• • , court. Tester argues. :
• -The petition for review was A notice of apublic com- .
filed by Theodore Tester, who missioners' meetinS about
' owns property on the north the development stated that
side of - 8.7 acres on._ which "a topir of discussion at this _
- developer Gordon W. Curry hearing may . be whether or
' wants ta build the Curry-Z~vo not this proDosed plat will
' addition, with 16 lots for have a stgnificant adverse en= _
-single-family homes. vironmental impact," Tester
- , . ~ ~=The proposed development alleges, - ° . - • .
is on, the west side of However, the xioard'unlaw-
• " McDonald north of Wellesley. f~y and. erroneously did not
Grant's order said- it- ap- ask at the hearing for any .
' pears from Tester's allega- - evidence about the environ- .
--tions that the counry commis- mental impact questfon, and
" sioners' actions in approving minutes of the meeting do not
the development on Dec. 9 reQect. anY - consideration of
. .'"were aot supported by sub= , that issue at. all,. he alleges."_ . .
. ' stantial evidence and were . Earlier Iast year the Coun-•
contrarp to 1'aw, erroneous, ty Planning Commission had••
arbitrary aad capricious." recommended- that . Curry's.
That •statement, however, , proposed development be de=
' daes not constitute a ruling in nied, but he appealed to the -
. the case; Grant, said. All it commissioners. '
. . means =is-lhat he found suffi- It was the secoad t3me Cur-
. cient basis in Tester's :allega= ry had submitted' a proposal _
tions . to decide a-•Snperior• to develop the prnperty. The
. Court review of the• commis- q_,first prnpo9al, which was re•~'
•,sioners' actions should be jected by the county commis- ,
• conducted. - • sioners ia August, called for
In written fitndings entered 24 lots on the 8.7 acrea,. fori
' - by the commissioners on I3ec: d. single-family homes and dup-
' 9, it is stated that "the pro• ~ . lexes.
• • • - posed plat exemplified a com- _ . - - •
' . parible deasity with the sur•~ ,
t0uIId1II$ AlE'.a."
Tester, ._.however, alleges '
. that finding is "not snpported.
- - . • ' by • any evidence -oi, the. re-" - ' - .
- . - : cord;. and ignores subatantial-:
evidence of the record to the ,
contrarY-" • - 1
, • ~
~ ' ,
. . , . . " , ~ . .
- . _ • , - - ' . _ _ . _ . . - . . - ; - - - Q
v
No . 76 1195 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE
CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING - PE-1023A-76, CURRY TWO SUBDIVISION: ZE-75-76,
AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: GORDON UV . CURRY
V1/HEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Commission did, after public
hearing on October 8, 19 76, forward to the Board of County Commissioners a
recommendation that the preliminary plat to be known as Curry Two Subdivision
(File Number PE-1023A-76) and Zone Classification upgrading (File Number
ZE-75-76) be denied, and
VVHEREAS, Gordon VV. Curry, did by letter dated October 15, 1976" request a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and
testimony against the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the
above-described preliminary plat and zone change upgrading, and
VVHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did hold a public.hearing
November 12, 1976, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission
and testimony and request of the applicant, objectors, and other interested
p artie s , and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, opportunity was afforded those favoring and
those opposing the above-described preliminary plat proposal and zone change
upgrading, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County having fully
considered the testimony given, the records and minutes of the Planning Commission,
the environmental assessment, and all other evidence presented: and having per-
sonally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question does hereby
find : -
1} That the proposed plat exemplifies a compatible density with the
surrounding are a . NOVV, THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners does conclude that
the preliminary plat of Curry Two Subdivision and zone classification upgrading
should be and hereby is approved, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the plat be designed «s indicated on the preliminary plat of record
and/or attached sheets as noted (Exhibit A).
2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more
than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or ' building sites without filing a replat.
3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on ~
the preliminary pla't of record.
4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be
held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded:
A 1' strip at the ends of edges of all streets that terminate or border the
plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streetsterminate
at the pl at bound arie s).
5. That appropriate street names be indicated.
-1-
6. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the
approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department
and the utility companies. Written approval of the easements by the
utility company must be received prior to fihe submittal of the final plat.
7. That a plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved
by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must
also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The
health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district .
will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on fihe face of said water
plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will
adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certifi-
cation will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. .
'The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a
copy of said water plan that appro,priate contractual arrangements have
been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system,
in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule will provide,
in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by the
appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits
within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a provision
holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any
lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat
sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water systema
The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public
water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and
the local fire district and a purveyor will be installed within this plat,
and the subdivi sion will provide for individual dome stic water service
as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot.
The Spokane County Health District has determined that the soil conditions in the plat are suitable for on-site sewage
disposal systems on each lot.
8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to
the filing of the final plat.
9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to 11/1/77 .
10. That streets be improved to standards established by Spokane County or
a bond to caver the cost of such improvements be furnished the Courny
Engineer: The bond may also cover the cost of "as built" plans,
engineering costs, and placing of final center line monuments.
11. That profiles of streets, cross sections, proposed grades, and drainage
plan of the plat be submitted and approved by the County Engineer and
by the Planning Director before the final plat is drawno Prior to accep-
tance of the improvements or release of bonds, a certificate by a re-
gistered civil engineer or licensed land surveyor will be required in-
dicating that all improvements have been installed to the lines and
grade s shown on the approved construction pl ans .
12. Conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of
the right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat
by the County En4jineer. That an additional 10' of right of way on McDonald -
be provided, and that the dedication contain a statement to the effect
that individual lot access ta McDonald Road be prohibited.
_2_
w -
13. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to '
be approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff.
ZONING RECOVIMENDATION: Approve Curry Two Addition (Revised) as
indicated on ihe preliminary plat of record to the Single Family Residential
(R-1) Zone Classification upon filing of the final plat. '
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DEC if 1976 OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON BORRD oF sPOKANE ,
Lcul9`lfl-Y C,00:?1v'1[~~~9-1A'L-R5
, RAY W. CHM. IrPl n
~~o% U.
HARRV M. LA.RNED
ATTE ST :
VERNON W: - OHLAND Clerk offi6ard
- , i,~' .r%/,.' / ` _ t'~
y ;
• L7
beputy C~ .
- 3 -
r- .
~
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) -
SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION )
UPGRADING, PE-1023A-76, CURRY TWO ADDITION )COMMISSIONERS' DECISION
(Revised), ZE-75-76, AGRICULTURAL TO )
SINGLE FAMiLY RESIDENTIAL - CURRY ) •
This being the date set by the Board of Spokane County Commissioners to render
its decision concerning the request of Gordon W. Curry, East 9209 Trent Road,
Spokane, Washington, for the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone
classification upgrading; and
The Board having received the recommendation to deny said request from the
Planning Commission as contained in the Commission's minutes of October 8, 1976;
and
The Board having conducted its own public hearing on November 12, 1976, at the
request of the sponsor, Gordon W. Curry, and after visiting the site and reviewing
the testimony; and
The Board being fully advised in-the premises did determine, based upon the
testimony given at the hearing and other evidence considered by the Board, to
approve this revised plat plan*i.e. 16 lots on 8.7 acres.
The Board directed the Planning Department to prepare Findings and Order,• for
execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting'forth more definitively
the Board's action in this matter.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 2 day of December, 1976.
VERNON W. 0 LAND
C 1 erk of t 'Boa rd
by '
Ro a ne Montague, Deputy Clerk .
RECEIVFID~
D C.C
.)r~~~i4t vVuir o I
i~ • „ -
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, 4JASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY )
SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION )
UPGRADING, PE-1023A, CURRY TWO ADDITION ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(Revised), ZE-75-76, AGRICULTURAL TO )
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1), CURRY )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P. M., November
125 1976, at their office in the. County Courthouse, to consider the above
mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading on
property located in:
Section 34, Township 26 N., Range 44, E.W.M.
- The South 539.3 feet of the North 1,650.2 feet
of that portion of the SW4 of Section 34 lying east
of a line drawn from a point in the North line of
said SW%, 1578.6 feet east of the NW corner thence
to a point in the South line of said SW4f 1579.2
feet east of the SW corner thereof, except the South
179.76 feet and except that portion lying within .
McDonald Road.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a,significant adverse environmental
impact-.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said
hearing and present testimony either for or against. the recorrrnendations
of the Spokane County P.lanning Commission.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 21st day of October, 1976.
VERNON W. OHLAND
CLERK OF THE BOARD
,
BY*sanne Montague, Deputy Cler
.
~
,
ffij-
CZxx W
CURRY r
ArM co.
RJILTORS !
~ k AND
Lar:a ~
'i~ LEti'ELCtPEAS
I
~~1, ~
. . ,
EAST 9209 TRENT AVENUE ~ SPO~ANc, WASHlNGTON 99206 ~ TELEPH4NE (505) WA 8-0600
Octohpr 15, 1.976
-
_ ocr1~197s
SpokanP County Commission.ers
Spokane, Washington
near Sirs;
We wi sh ta anpeal th e dec~. si on of_ the County P1. ann incx
Board on Fri_day the $th of Octohe.r., reaa.r.d.ing PF: 1023-76 ZE 75-76, and would anrr_P_C~ atP a bearinq as soon as
possibl e..
Encl os? ng the f ee of $ 2 5.00 e Th ank _yrnu ,
, 1~.. . > > .
Gor_don W. C'u.rrv
.
Q~O~lM~SSION
RESIDENTIAL • COIviMERCIAL ~ ACREAGES • LAND DEVELOPMENT
~ r 9-~
Oc-t ober 1976
P lannin; C omrr.is s i on
Psabl7 c Works Build'~ r.G
F. 811 Jofferson Street
S p o k,,-,, n e , 'a a ss i2 Y11g t on
`Je :e,:2e widersicnecl -oroperty awners petition a,gainst tae -oroposed
applic-ation of Gordon 11. Curry, East 9209 Tren~ Road, Spo;,ane
ti°ras',-Unrrton Vr;1om has filed a p1at pl`n to be knoi•in as Curry D-ro.
Also t~e cLaanGin; of the zonin;ma-o frorn wgric(A~lturwl to 3ingle
fa ~i1_,y residental, on tae prooert;r descr-i_bed by NotYCE oi"' Pu'oZic
Ueari nG.
T:ie petry tioners o-opose sub ject d.evelope:.fzant f or t:ie f olloviy ng
'rEasans:
7.-';roper-'kJj.es ad4az.ii:-{; pro-oosed aevelopiaent are 9a-tilized f~r
a;ricu--ti2ral -ourposes.
En.vior;ental and eca~~~ly impact on surrou:ndin; properties
wO:,11d res t-ricf, it' s isiten,5.EC~ ~ ~sar;e .
DeveloDeArent wou.ld initiwte and encou-rar,E a,dditienal spot zoni-nG
,wi tni-n ;hE: immied.iate area.
Increased traf f ic on sec onciary eXi s 1U-i ,,,g road ( ~;enonald Rowd )
wol-ild reUul~ in azi~zlJT conSested ~r~.ff~.c ~'lo~~i. It is also
anticipated t'.,a.t costs fc2^ pavinG of existir?g road wil 1 confront
pre; e-nt property owners in i„Ze near fut-ure, in a resl7lt to
Fna.:intaiYz s~,t~.sf~,ctory roa.d net~dor~k to serve t.ze a~.c~~.t~.onal
hn::ies -r.;iitlain t}7e area. T_-,e in1acrited c os ~s f or pa.v-lrg of t~.e
road wo;,lld ne -orohibited to prese:nt property owne-r5.
- ,
,
' ~
, • .
It would be mandatory t,ae,.t a netir water pu:LpinG sta-tion be
-
const,r-:cted in tne generwl wrea to provied a. ada.quate water p'
supply.
~'~le dEVel^pement during cQmnlete constrvction tirould ca.;ise
enumerous inconveniences fcr aurround-.M~ mroperty oNne~~s f~ar ~.n
exte,-?,.ded nerilod of time.
Add.itional costs iqill be leviea u-oos-L i.he sc1zqol district far
student "Gransportwtion ancl educational faciliti.es.
N9 aeve lopement of the purpo sed nature exist swifi,': in=-. t ~ is area.
Existimv~ dwel,lincs i:z the area are locu.ted on not less t:1an one
acre. _1ost of. whic'a are on f ivE wcre s or ffiore.
In clos7nG we t:ze property owners as?i ~he Planninr- Commission
to ac ~ f~,vorably, , in our beha.lf , to disapprove t~,.eproposed
rezoziii~g and plat plan. ~
~
~
1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~
e - , S.:~r A•~ a r ~ _ _ -
~
t1~ S-3
_ , ~ ~ i ~ • l y 1 ~ ~ ~
\4
ee L r ~ ~ y1~ e ~ ~
w ~ y
~
.
Vo
yfz
~
~ ~
YX~
~
E5
~
,
►
/jt/f 0'~" r-
y 4-c?-?
~ s ~ - 11t1 ~
F,-6
~
,
le,
I 1 I• ~ ~9 ~ .wA ~
A5-
ty
, . a~
71
57,) /v ~
6~ . s 6 77
q~. . ~ a'
^ ~c •
573
,N
r~~ - ~GL'~ /
~~o l
~
~
~
. ~ ~6~~,.~
/
`a 0
q,:2 ~
t~~~~ ; L F ~
~
t 6d.
~
- ~ ~
0~7
s
~ .
13
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
< < <
~
~
~
./~r .
~
.
YT~r~
~
o c ~
.40- :
~
1,2,
. ~ p-`~ ~
~Gv
7 [ - ~
~
Ile s ~ ~ l
~L
~
. 6 S 11 Zp
7
r-
' -
10.1
-Gv rll - ~
9~6
~
O°
.
.
Ao n
.
.
AGENDA, OCTOBER 8, 1976 TELEPHONE N0. : 456-2274
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Tirne : Friday, October 8, 1976, 9:30 A.M.
Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex
(Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING
1. PE-1023A-76, Curr,y Two Addition - Revised
ZE- 75 -76, Agricultural to Single Famil,y Residential (R-1 )
a. Location: Section 34, Township 26 N., Range 44, E.W.M.
The South 539.3 feet of the North 1,650.2 feet
of that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 34 lying east of a line drav,m from
a point in the North line of said SirJ 1/4, 1578.6 feet east of the NW corner
thence to a point in i,he South line of said SW 1/4, 1579.2 feet east of the
SW corner thereof, except the South 179.76 feet and except that portion lying
wi thin McDonald Road.
. b. Sponsor: Gordon W. Curry
East 9209 Trent Road
Spokane, Washington 99206
c. Engineer: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc.
North 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, Washington 99206
d. Site Size: $.7 acres
e. Number of Lots: 16 (A reduction of 8 lots from first submitted plat)
f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings
g. Existing Zoning: A gricultural, established April 24, 1942
h. Advertised Zone Upgrading: Single Family Residential (R-1)
i. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3-
j. School District: East Valley School District
~
_ , .
ti SANSON AvE EL. 9041Q
,
o Q ,
o p
e
~ • ix Q.
' 0 G ce' ,
cr Q W. N
0
i Q ir 0 ,
Z W 4.
0 3 .
L] ~ J t)
v~ ~ ~ W
WELLESL"EY AVE.. a '
" . ~+-~r r . 5CqtE:
~ HEROY
~
'~'~~tP ~ n e P/ pn fe u.ow~ .r te o = (D ~
lx
1
. Octo'oer 4, 1975
~ laytrt ~n7-, tJ ~?1ml S S i OI1
.Publ-iC'JJI' k S L u1 ld?.CI S
11.811 J efi erson Stre° 'U
;ie '_,~►e ujzdersivnecl -~ro~oerty o~~~rriers ne ti ~ion ~.~~.ins ~ t~~ e yc~ro~os2d
a,ti~licwt~; oi~ o~ Cordon W. C~r--,-y, Ea.s~ 9200 ~"ren~ poad, SQOxr~.~z2
Was:nirzgton wnom nws filed a nl~.~ 1~l?~~ ~o be r~no~.-r:n a.s Curr;~ Tc,ro.
1
A!so t*2e d?zansins of the zon7 n- ma-o irom, agricdLft,ura1 to single-
fami?y riesider_tal on t:1z -oroDerty described by- i3otice of 1 ublic
:ieari-~.
~ Tae pet., itioners onpose su'o iect deve? ooement ior the f ollow? ng
neasons : P I, one.-rt, i e s adj Ol.liln-`-7j pro-oosEd development a.re utilized for agi'1CU1 tu?^a1 pLtr'UOS2S.
arv ior.;.ental and ecogaly imvac tki on surrounaing propert-ies
;rcald res -LLrict it' s in;e-Aaed -t-isw :e .
v
Develone-ment «ouid ini t-iG.te and encourao-e additional spot zani ~S
with-in trne immediaie area.
IrCT'e2 3°d traffic on sec oizcia-ry exi sti--S rowa ( ~~,cDonald Road )
would res,alt in ahig.;.i1y congested traffic f law. It is also a n~~ ciDated tL~~.t costs i or pav_n~; of existir_-, road j,.ill confront
Dresent'" prop°rty owne?^s in tae near f,a ,LUure, in a resuIi, 'uo
~nuain a sa.tisfactory road ne -Lutqoriz to serve u,.e addit,iofial
no~:~es dait:za.n t~-ie arew, l~,-)e i.,~,ieriLea costs- for pa1ir_g of tLie
road wouId be Drohibited to ?oresent properi y own°rs.
~ •
,
I i~ would 'oe mandatory t,zat a ne:•r wa ~er pumpin;; staVion be
conUtr~-7cted ^n the generwl arew to provied a z.daa-ua.te :--rater
s"Poly .
l.ze devel^nemer_t czaring complei,e constur1_:c~ion wnula cause
enUm@Ir'Oi.t~ inCoT1VE?21e'1CES aur-rounc:? nS UY'ODe?'' 'uy Dwf12i 3 f-r aTI
Ex ~em.ded per } od o~' t imie .
Additional costs will be levied u~:)o1z the ScilOOl ciistr'iCt sor
student i,ransporttoation asza educational faci?ities.
i~~o cievelopemer_t. of ~~ze purgosed na~are exists wit'~in't-;1-i-sarza.
Exist-iwr cwellings in t'qe a_rea are locai,ed on not less taan cne
acre., ;:ost oi . ivnic:i a_re on f ive acre s or more. .
In closi-ng we th2 p:^opert-y owners asu t~--,e P1a-Lin?r_g Coi-ii?aission
tio act favorabl l, in our 'oehaIf, , to disanprove tiie pro-oose3
rezolzlns a:nd tilat plan. d
~
~ . .
I
,
i ( ~
/ r Z ~y,..~- -•`~.i- /
yp~
, ~ t~t`-~ ~~,~1'~.~``•y~'-2..~.. , j r--~
lv~ t, I_~ ~ ~ L
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ /~7 /V~~`✓ ~ f . . r 61V~
r..J 1..-'~-%' " ~ ' ' ••-.1 '~i • ~
-47 2_,~
~ ~.~..t~ ~ s 2
1--- • ~ t~, ~ C'~ -
/ y
~L`~ ; q~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~
~'~t~, ~e;e~..• ~ IV,~~~'(~► ! ~ r~ j / ~>~7/- ~ ~I r / G' r ~
~.3..t
000_'{~,!
f r ~
~ ~ ~ / ~t ~7,~r : ~''~Z- ` , ~ ~ y ' _ ~ ~
l, / ~ v , 'y~ ~ ~ r ;s~- ~ ~
~ ~ y ~ ~ y~ ` / r~ , ~ , r~•: ~ '
r11X/, . ~ f ~ ` . ~j ~
f,,'~~/f'~/v' ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~
~:4'
~ ~ 1~ .I i' a._ + ir j~ ~ ~
R+.rw y~.~ r 1
v v~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ' ~ • t ~ ' -
,1 • ' L ~ ~ c
~ ~ t J~'L i` ' ,f'J ~V• ~ .f„ ; ~i C• •
~r
:
, ~
~
~ y ~ ~ ~
` . t G~~ ~ ♦ ~..~J l ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ -
~
• r f ~ r ~ ~
,~r~~~ • ~ ~ / ~
/ ~ r- f~ . • / ~ ~
• • r/.-~--z~.~..._%C L ~i / C~ ~Y' c~ ~ j~// d ;?~F ~
(7-
. c~
7 l
~ ~ Z t
~L._. z~~
~ L
:5r r .
/ L 4 . "0
-d- r c, e,
,
~ ~ 1
~
9- 5 ~c~~
)-41
,~?'1 ~ ..-:.2. 3 ! :2
5i
~ ,V, .
iqcp ~ .
.
5 d77
~ ~ . .
. ~
. ,
~
.
~
~
~
~
O... J
. 1 ~
~L9`1q
- - .
j 1
4 c
~
~
~
,
l Z
~
. .
1
~ .
.
,
, ~ _ - ' ~ G~ ~ ~ ~ ~ P~
. ~ .
r . . i' ~ ~ / . 1 - • - 7
~ , • ~ Y ~ ~ • 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ / s ~ ~ ~1 ~ ~
°i i. , J - L. • ~ .
~ ` - ~ / - / ' ^ . ^ ~ U • f
- . :
, / r / ~ • ( ~ ~
. ~ -
, ~ ~ll ~1~~ y'? ~ - ~2 3 J . -
yo~ ~
~ . -
~
r-
;
.
~ ~ ~ C . .
Coll~~/
. ~Ag
, •'~i~~ , - _ ~ ~ ~
. ~
-2
~~l--
.
ze
' ` ~ .
SPOKLNIE COL~Ii11 E?tiGIi:E£R
ROAD DEPARTMENT
SUBDIV?SZOiq SECTZON
T0: Director of'PlanninQ' . DATE: October 4, 1976
PROM: Robert S. Turner., County Eaginzer .
SUBJECT: Standard Plat Conditions , -
k'e recommerid approval of the plat of pF_1 r,ttguv TlJn nTTTnETRev7,19,,~,1 subject to the following cond;2ions:
that conditional approval'of the plat is given subject to dedication oi Right of
Way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Eaniaeer;
that plans, profiles, and cross sections showiag proposed street centerliae and curb grades be subraitted to the County Enoineer for approval prior to construction and .
.the filing of a final plat; thEt drainage plans and desiga calculations showing the grades and aligrnaent of drain-
aoe facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction
and the filing of a final plat;
co nstruction within the proposed public streets and easements s'nall be perforned .
. under the -direct supervision of z licensed Iand surveyor, who shall be responsible -for psrpetuatiag all evidance of the location of survey monuments which may be
disturbed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As ,
Built" plans and a certificate in wzitino that all irnprovements were iastalled -to the lines and grades shown on the approved-constniction plans and that all disturbed
monuments have been replaced;
. no construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way uatil a petmit
has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval
by the County Engineer; . ,
y
. all construction within the Public Right of Way.is to be completed prior to filing
the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the
cost of coastruction of improvenents, construction certification, "As Built" plan9,
and monumenting the streeC centerlines shall bs f iled with the County Engineer.
h •
lo' 5POKANE VALLEq If 11-riE DEPARTIAENT
\
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
September 29, 1976
Mr. Dwight Hume, Acting Director
Spokane County Planning Commission
Spokane, Washington
Dear Mr. Hume:
The following zone changes and preliminary subdivisions have been reviewed
for adequate fire protection:
VPE-1023A-76 - There are existing mains in this area but hydrants will be
ZE- 75 -76 needed.
PE-1045- -76 -
ZE- 117 -76 - Mains and hydrarits need to be installed in this area.
PE-1046 -76 ZE- 118 -76 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area.
PE- 960 -74
ZE- 59 -74 - Mains and hydrants need to -be installed in this area.
ZE- 110 -76 - This a rea is covered by adequate mains and hydrants.
ZE- 113 -76 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area.
ZW- 115 -76 - There are existing mains surrounding this subdivision, but new
mains and hy drants wi11 be required to serve this area.
Sincerely, ~ - ' •
,
. a~, ~
Al Cook
Lt. of Inspectors
Fire Prevention Bureau
SP3
ac : cy
V%004* 4AAU
19- opqgvrunw~111%
~ PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI VES
januacy 5 77
I
File, PE-1023A-76 (Curry TMro Subdivtsion)
?homa s G. Mosher, planner
~
SEPA Coriapliance.
~
Examination of this fils on 1/4/77 cevesled an adminlatretivs aversiQht ln that
neither a"formal" propoeed oc iinal dsclaration of non-eiQnificance has been
iseued.
~
Hawever, the file contains aufficient docutasnation that SEPA has bean addressed
and Eully coneidersd, and, fwrthermore, that thera was never any questian about
the intent af the staff and Boerd of Caunty Comanisaionecs to leaus the
thnshold d•cerruine cion.
speaifice ily:
* An evvfronmental cbecklist ryvaa filed by the apylicant foc the arigtnal
proposal (lE-1023-76).
* A stafl ceview r+scomtrmded iasuance oE a deciaracloa of non-aiqnificance.
+ 3uch a dsclaratiaa wa• pceparsd and ie in the file but was nevtr sfqned
bocause of the ensuft appsal.
* When the plet waa turned dawn by the Bosrd in appeal (for density
rsasons), it was resubmittsd to the Planninq Comaalosion with 1/3 less
density. A novv sAVironmuntal cReaklist wae Ltubmitted by the applicant.
* The stati revtaw aqain cecom.mended a declacatian of ncansiqnificance,
but the Planainq ComYniasioa aQain turaed the plat doarn. Hawever, no
adveree environnaertal conditions or rsnsans were raiaad to qusstion the
validity at the recommended threshold deteTminatiow. The decisian M►as
appeslad to the Boacd by the applicant.
* The 8oard found in favor oi the applicant aad stated in thaic Dacambsr 9,
1976, "FindinQs and Order" (No. 76-1195) that it hed fully aansidered
..ths rscords and minutea of the Ptannlnq Comiaission, the
environmsntal asasssment, . . .
* Th• abave-csfssaced asseaament recommend0d issuance of a declaration
of non-siqnificance. Consequently, inherent withtha Board' • dacision
to approve the plat was their intention to issue, aa Responaihle Offlcial,
the propoeed and final declarations of non-eigrgicance.
The Planain9 Department edtainistrativaly errored in not prspacinq these document8
foc the Chairmen of the Board to siqn. Consequently, thsso documents are to be
issued imeaediataly in acoor++danc;o with the Spokane County Eaviconmentl Ordinance, ~
11.15.340.
?GM:cmrv
cc: Mr, jerry Noal
PI M-10ZlA-774
.
. . ~
S~~a~'~~►.~.~'`~J Gtl 31; ~
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
-
'`d!~ • s ~ ~I~ALr DECLARATION OF
(proposed/final)
SNUnaNf COUr•ir CJuwt tiU >r
(significance/nonsignificance)
1. Description of Proposal: Slj6Q1V►~ION 31 ACJMS ot: LlWQ
L~6 -(t) 20, Sco sQ.f1. LCFTs foe. swGi..s fwiw
TIMAT-A,115-G~ UW
9ts
2. Proponent: ~ . C~.~Y •
3. Contact Person: A2 _
3. County Action(s) Requested:
-
SL.lQ Al- ELLT A&AVJU3
4. Location of Proposal: -ftt 13= ET t~,J0 R.'T 4 QF we11 FS LIE`f _
-
QvFw. - ~ W C*T ~Fr- QF kUWNS Adb-LD
5. Lead Aqency: v tu This proposal has been determined,to have a significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS -is K= required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) , Thi.s
decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist
and other information on file with the lead agency. 6. Responsible Official: k&Y ' c • lco'Pf=z7
COMM
Position/Title: IUAQc~ Z - 0_1P" _CV•
Department: PL& N ~ ~6 A-~
/Date: I / S p~~ Signature: (oroposed)
Date: '7 Signature: C, (final) ~
;~P~-toz3A-76 f eaoZ -
SEPA PIC Refer. # _ 4~~~"8Bee4 Dep t ent Re e ence
, , (fi' . {f,'1
na-
-(See Reverse Side)
. • ~
_ J~ . / . •
7. For Declarations of Significance Only:
Dsts of Expected D:-aft EIS 1lvailability
(determined by Responsible County Official)
Date Enterecj in "EIS in Preparation Register"
(determineci hy SEPA Public Information Center)
To he Gompleted by responsible official:
a. Brief description ancl listing of those environmental impac:ts leading to such
dPClaration: b. Brief explanatzoil of whcat measures, if any, coulcl be tafcen to prevent or mitigate
the cnvironmental impacts of the prUposal to such an extent that the responsible
oEficial r.ould consicicr a revised propasal witli ._1 possible resulting
declaraCion of nonsignificanr.e:
(proposed/final)
g, For Pronosecl Declarativrr of Nonsignificance Only:
Date Entered "Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance
f2egisrer" (determined by SEP11 Public Information Center)
Date comments to be received (15 day review period)
(determined by SEPA .Public In£ormation Center)
.9. SEPA Public Information Center:
(For departments of General Government only)
( ) Approved a s to form
( ) Disapproved as to form
REasons: Signature of SEPA PIC Officer: -
Da tE:
I '
•s w'~ .
~
.
E X H I B I T A
~
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM
AREA AND DISTANCE ■E]ODOOODODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODO000000000000000000000000000000000000
Total amoun-i; of land in this Subdivision: Acres
Proposed density of the Plat: Lots/Gross Acre
'i'otal amount; of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Acres
Pr-oposecl use of controlled adjoining land: e~ Irlhat is the dra.ving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? ~
Shopping facilities? a~/eS Municipal Boundary: Paved street or highway? _Fo_az~r
1~1
LAND USE ■oooooooooaoooaooooo0000000oooooaoopooooo0000000000000000000oooooa0ooo
Indzcate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings
Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes:
Multi-family dwelling units ( Indicate which lots:
Mobile Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses:
Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: '
What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? ~
List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: acres.
Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres
I s keeping of animals desired? No ( Yes ( Type :
]MPRO TS •ooooo00000000000000000000000oooooOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO[)oo
Do you, plan to file the Plat,in its entirety as proposed, or wi11 it be a multi-phase dev-
elopment? ey~; p~
To what level of improvement/will streets be constructed? Gravel Minimumo
C u,rb ancI Gravel ( Curb and Paved (
Describe any combinations of above:
What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: 96 Dav,g .
Street :-_mprovements completed? ~A9r+A_e.- . Substantial number of lots occupied? Is dedication of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.)
No. ( Yes (X Describe: /-6 a..a/
I'ndicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: Zoo o ct,&. Square feet
Number of bedrooms _,p,
Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( Yes
Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? No Yes (
If "yes", explain:
UTILITIES ■DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO0OOOC3OOOOOOODOOOOODO000000000000000'O(3OD0
Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank Lagoon (
Treatment plant ( Other, or combinations (Describe)
Indxcate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( Public system (X).
Private community system (
Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings):
Underground utility easements ( Overhead utility easements (7~.
Utilities in streets No easements (
Indicate the-distance from this pro osal to the nearest existing water main: ~~d feet„
Indicate size of nearest main: " Inches.
7-
List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat:
Electricity: _,~L/,ULR Gas: , Water: Phone:
► - , .
. ` y •
' . . .
EXHIBIT A ° Page 2
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued)
ACKNOWLEDCMENTS •ooooo0000000oooooaooooo0000000oooooaooooo00000000oooooaooooo0000
PROPOSED PLAT NAME:
I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has
been prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane
County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington.
(Signed) Date:
, . (Address) Phone:
- - ' ; - . . : - Zip :
. . -
SURVEYOR.'-S''S~AL
please print
I, , the sponsor of this proposed subdivision, am the
(owner ( builder ( agent ( option holder ( X); contract holder (
of the property proposed to be platted and have completed the information requested of ine and
do hereby testify that it is correct and accurate. -
- (Signed) _ GU Date :
(Address) J9 ~ Phone :
. _ : Zip:
- ' . NOTARY Date :
NOTARY-: T, :
Special Comments: ,
. ~
. .
■ooooDOODOOODOOOOOO■ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING DEPARTMIINT ~=0000000000000006
PLANNING DEPARTMIINT INFORMATION
Date Submitted: Checked by:
u School District: Ve.~_a.-l Preliminary Plat Fee*:
~ . ~ .
U
Existing Zoning: Date established:.
E_~ •
Advertised Zone IIpgrading.
Zone Change File No.:
Number of Lots: Location: Section Township Z,~~ Range
Plat Fil e No. : Plat 1Yame :
~
a'~
~ ` --J ~1~ --~l~~#~-~R~-C-S~ . - - ~ _ _ _ ~ _ I ~ ' --~~~~1~~~ r 1 ~ 7 ~ - - - ~K~~CI~T ELLN I~1~
~ - - f _ ~
_,l ~a~c~~ ~ocu~~~~
NUI~a~R - NUM~~R AS'~~~SE~ ~14~NER - ~ LEGAL ~~S~PI'PTt~lr ~R~P~'~~f~ "~~k~bYER ~
- ^ - . e- ~G~C~~~ ~I~P~P~IR~YS E~ 44 h~4~'~FT C~ _ _ _ _ N~~'~NR 1l ~GRRE RA ~'H ~S ~ ~
P ' Ffi 9 ~ ~~xl~ s~~r~ ~xc p~~, ~ ~ ~s~~ ~f ~~~r~ ~ rc cCr~a~~ ~c TH~ "5~~~14 ~ E~C 1~3faFT DF ~HE 5354~1'; EI~G C~ ~D ~ CANAL RI~i S~CI~AI+E YA ~S~ZI~E
~ ~4b~-3~ ~Q~ ~ ~IUMPHR~1' 3~r 4~ 54~3.?F~ ~F Nll~Fh~~1CS ~R J
~~~~.~~T ~F F~~ a~ s~E1J~ ~F Swl~~~ ~E~ 1579.~~~ E C~ ~G~ ~ ~a15 ~C ~C~t~l~ ~C _
GF 5E~ TH ~v ~C OF SMlIf~ 15~~~b~T ~ OF i~li4 C~R~ [lF SE~C E~LC ~~~It~~E -wA 5~~1~
~ ~IL ~~'~14 1C5Z.4~~` ~ltl, T~ PT ~~FT I~ ~F I~~ ~~R S~il/~ S ALG
tr ~ & P R T ~ F /4 T F L I 6~ i~ C~ A l G F S~ 1 ~ S L ~ S E C 1~ F T k Q F S~ C~' R _ - . - _ - - -
OF S 1~ Z14 W IG~~.9FT ~4I~ ~'C P~8
s 34b~~--~+C55 ,t''S1~CP63 w~~~r~dS~~NS 3~ c6 44 5~~78.7~T TESTER TF~~CL~R~ A . _ _ _ - -
l~~il0.9FT ~F__Et~5~.8Fi` '~F Sl~ll4 ~XC C~ ~RC ~A~( ~XEwFTIG~I H F~~~ M~ C~~GL~' ,
- ~'~RpCS~S ~~+'~1' S~CI(AhE '~~6 59~1~:
'A _ _ _ - _ _ _ . r _ _ _ ~ - _ .
~34E~~r~lY+~'~1~ ~1~4~~4 A ~ ~~~~~ItIY~~ 't~ .]CV~rf~~ 1[..~C~ ~~CLI~~~~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~J ~i~~ ~ I r1 C R 11~+C ~ 1~. S~ E C C C h.~~, ~C C~~bl~ ~ K S~C ~I~'~ M~ 4421 E
- 4~-~~ ~~~~863C w R ~1RIS~~►r 34 Z~ 44 5359,~~ ClF CF~~IST H5 ~N ~M ~ 3 b~ b C ~ f~
Nl47C~'S~ ~F ~I~~~.~' SWII~ E~C R~ ~'~C~ PI~E~IRE - - - - - - _ _ _ - SLR CITY ~II ~'~3~1
, 3~ib43~~C6 51C863C ~i R CHRIS~~N~ 3~ 44 517~.7~ ~F -e-,-- - Ct~~lC~l ~~~EiC'~RE - N f~ 0 t~ F ' D F 5 E_. - ~4 R a ~ 1 5. 2 _ E I~ 5~. 8 ~ I~ l~ E C 1+ E P~ h~ S R~,
~PCK,b~E '~~d ~~~~E
- - - . ~ _ _ _ . _ -.~.o _ - - - - _ - - - - - _ ~46~~r3-9~ ~ 74~6~48 ~ d~NNIS L wr~~ ~4 L~ 44 si'~ IANC 16~.9FT L F D iVN ~ f I S
~C~ a~~ 5~c ~C G~ ~T 5~i1~ LrG ~~F lN ~DRI~ F~N~ i~~E.bFT E CF ~V ~~~1 rC a~~~~0 ~
h1wCGR TO PT 15T~.~~T E L~~ ~i~C~R S~~i~a~w~ ~r~S!N ~~~'~~E
~4b43-~~'bl ~~~~4$~ ~ E~U~VH~~1 34 ~6 44 w~4.~~~C S~v~AC ~L~FfAM RC~~R~ C~ ~ ~F Sf 1/~ CF SV~ 1!~►• ~~G ? F F I 9 ~L 1~ ~.2 .~1 Sw CE~ QF ~~C F! f~~ C7 ~~~~.ES~~Y
- r - - - , ~ fi(.~_d~ ~ ~~F 5~►114 1~~~,~' E W fil k ~dR T'~ ~1C~Z.~,~ TH S T~ Pfi SP[k'AhE ~A ~E T
1~5~.~' ~ CF PG~ T~i W1U~2.'~' i'~ PD~ E~C ~~C' ~l~ 5#~7.~~ ~~X'C
' F ~ ~ l~'C R Q W16C ~ a3~'2
~4~643-'~;;~C 151C~~~~ F~~~~~ C~ 44 ~$~'Ffi ~F '55~7~~Ffi OL'1~FA~i Rt~~R~ F F ~F ~ U
a~ ~~L~ o ~~c~ ~c a t ~F ~E~~~ ~F ~w~~~ ~r~ ~ ~~.c7 ~E~~~ ~~Y ~w~ - - ~ _ _ - -1 5~~ ~FT ~ 5wC~7R ~F ~E T~1 N ~C ~ CF ~M11~ ~_a . ~ ~ 1 , ~C L I5 9.~ E CF ~C~cANE ~,A S~21E
411/4 C~'R fiH '~li~~~.~~T T~ ; T~ PT1C~~.~~T ~~F ~~Q TH W1C~~.8FT a
Tf~ ~'p~
~4~,43-9:; 5~d ~4~ 1?$~C G~~1~.~l~S 44 F~ A~ 0~ S~C +4~ wA5~' ~~'f 'S~V
0~ ~QL '~t ~F !E11~ aF S~f~l4; 157'~.~~T E O~F S'~ ~R L~f 1'h ~ C1' 4~' C 5~~ ~il ~C ~ - _ ~ r~ ~ sw~~~~L~~~~,~~r o~ r~~~~ ec~ r~ ~ic~~ 4~r r~i --r ~ Pr -
. s ~ 1~'~~~~~~ ~~F ~OB TH 1~],~CS~.'~FT TC P~8 T~~ ~l(~I~P'~IGN PklRP~SE~
_ f~NLY
~4b4~-~~C 5~~ 4~ 17~~C ~ ti~~~~S ~4 ~6 44 t~AC 0~ ~2~A+C C~F 1~A5M ~l,'~ 5AV ~i~
T ~F ~W114: ~~G ~ ~ ~ ; . ~~l ~ ~F ~112 ~5 '~,~2 ~ E C S4i C~R 5E~ ~k~ N 1~ C~~CI~~1~3~7~ - - - - : . - -
~I E Q~ S#~ir4 15~$.6FT '~i14 ~'CR fi~ ~1~5~.4FT TH S T[ ~PT
1~~~. ~'FT ~ OF P~B TN ~ 1C5~,~Ffi T~i ~0~
- - _ _ ~ 4 ~~15~ ~"t~~t~ W~ T~R ~ ~ - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ 346 ~r ~3QZ ~ t~ S ~S ~~4~ ~~R TR PL S~.CL!~~ ~C1~~R0 J
ExC Ni~r~T ~ xC W~~Fi ~ EXC E~O~D~~ ~ ExC E1CC~~ ~F ~IZCFT C~ ~t ~~Q~ ~t~~d~.~ R~ ~
S*5Ffi SPCKAN~ '~A 9~~~,~ - - . ~ _ __s _ ~ _ .
4a 'S ~~WA~~ J S~GNK~ ~ F~~M IRR ~R &~1~7 S~t~~~ ~L~AR~ J ~ e
~ ~ ~ 57~FT r~ ~~C~ ~C ~OhALC ~C ~ I+CCF ~I~ZCF ~F SP~~IA~E I~A ~'~Z1~
. 4 3 R L M YICK~~ W~~R~~S IR~ ~i €4LI~~EL_E S~l ~a~,a~~a~~ ~€~c~c~ c~~ c
, ti fy~''~~ _ -'~T ~ FT B ~ ~ ~l~ ~I~OFT ~CC#C?8~i, ,~..c-~ N 131 ~ W 3 S'! 1 C
~ ~ r ~~;r~~~~. a
T~ ~ F# M OU~~,R~ FAR~'S I~R P~ 4 M~ 34644-~4~~ 74~b~4~C31~ ~ ~
~ ' 13~~T NZ~2!~T ~I3S3.~~1` 81+~8 E~(C ~ZCFT ~ ~ ~
X
4= 4~ ~ 8 D AR5~1~ ~~~i~Rt~S IRR TR P~ 4 Li~C 1S ~ S_~l_l~+~ 3~r64 G~►~C 53 ~ C - 5~~1~T ~F N~~3~~ClF ~i35J.~F~ ~1~~ E~(C WZtF~' C~ CC~17 ~
~~I~~~
F~ S1 F ~ S~l SPC 4G44-C~r 5 944~1f~~ 5M~T~I M FA~MS r~R TR PL 4 C 1 E 3 C
E333.2F~` ~F I~?53.~FT ~ 1~' 8 EX C N~9 3 F 1 1~ Q~? ~
l~MARY DA1A~ INPUT ~i~QS ~AR ~LS PRIhIT IN~S S SU . 1 5 . ~ . ~833 ~
~ - - ' - - ~ -
~ a ~ ~ ~
~ - ' ~ - - - . ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ ,
~ - ~ ~
~ (
I
PE-'I 02 ~ 76 and ZE-75-76
In the matter of a hearing on the application of Gordon W. Curry, East 9209 Trent Road,
Spokane, Washington, to consider a revised design for a preliminary plat to be known
as Curry Two Addition. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to
Single Family Residential and/or Two-Family Residential on the property described below,
such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats, of
such property. The property being platted is described as the South 539•3 feet of the
North 1,650.2 feet of that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 34, Township 26 N., Range 44,
E.W.M., lying east of a line drai,m from a point in the North line of said SW 1/4, 1,578.6
feet east of the NW corner thence to a point in the South line of said Subdivision
1,579.2 feet east of the SW corner thereof, except the South 179#76 feet and except that
portion lying within McDonald Road.
(West side of McDonald Road, approximately 1/4 mile north of Wellesley Avenue)
AFFIDAVIT OF PQSTING
STATE OF 1r1ASHINGTON )
} SSo
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
Being first duly svrorn, deposes and says:
That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United
States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one
yearso
That on~J 19k>, he personally posted three (3) true
and correct copies of tAe hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the
following places in Spokane County, to-wit:
1 0 ~ r %Z7Ir~ ~'tl~r 4- ~
~ Lt
2e
3.
+v
Subscribed and sworn to me
~ 19
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINCx r'L'O1V
Residing at Spokane, Washington
i
~ ~
~
'~v~t~ ar~ h~r~~~ n~tified~ ~~at vn
~ , at th~ ~our
~f s~i~d ~a~r ~r~ ~Car~~er~nrce ~c~vr~ lV~~~Io~ 1~ve~~~e
#r~ar~c~, 5~~►vkar~+e ~~►unty ~C~u~r~ ~ou~e ~nn~x~ ~rp~~~r~e,
~N'ashin~►#~r~~ T~~ ~Pt~~CA►I~~ ~~UNTY R~.A~~VN1~1I~ ~~~IA~IAI~
i s •
~I~N ~a►i11 ~~nd~u~t ~ ~ubl~+~ ~e~r~ng to
a~ r~. c~x, ~r ~ ~ ~u. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~ ~r~rr ~ ~
~i ~i~Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
7~
1~ ~~i~~~~~• ~
~
~~r~~ral d~~~ri~t~~n ~f ~r~a:
r~ ~~r.~ r.~ ~s~ ~ t~ ;~~a t~. ~r ~r ~r~~
~p ~ # i~ ~.~~i. ~ 1,~ .i.e a~' ■ 1~ ~re. ~ i~ ~ er
~ ~a~' N~ e~'~r ~ t~a a ~t ia ~ 6~t~t 11~r1 ~Y~ ~l~i^~
1 f~~ ~ o~` #he ~I ~r ~o~, ~or~ ~r ~t~ 1'~. i~i i~ ~ad ~r~ 't~~ ~r~i~
~t~ ~ ~d. dd~ ~~i ~ 4~` M~L~rrl~r~
FI~RTH~R ~Efi~All~ t~nta~t ~I~~ ~~oM~~n~ ~+~~nty
Pl~nnin~ ~~r~mi~~i~r~, ~'ubli~ ~V~rks ~~il~dir~+~, ~i~ ~~1 ,~e~fer-
~ ~~~r ~tr~et, ~pol~t~r~~, l~la~l~i~c~t~rt.
~t
alr~cter ei Planeing Spok~nr~ Count~r Planning Con~~~ssion
FOlIW Bd~6 PLNG. C+3Ml~. 9•E9
~
l
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON .
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PE-1023-76, )
CURRY TWO - ZE-75-76, AGRICULTURAL TO ) COMMISSIONERS'
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEtdTIAL AND/OR TWO ) DECISION
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - CURRY, Sponsor )
This being the time set by the Board.of County Commissioners
of Spokane County, Washington,.to render its decision concerning the request of Gorclort W. Currv, East 9209 Trent Road, Spokane,
Washington, for the above preliminary subdivision and zone
classification upgrading; and
The Board having received the recommendations of the Planning
Commission contained in tthe Commission's minutes of July 9,
1976, which denied the application; and
The Board having conducted its own public hearing at the "request
of the sponsor, Mr. Curry, on August 12, 1976, and after visiting
the site and reviewing the testimony; and
The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine to
uphold the recommendation of the Planning Commission which
denied this application and found the reasons expressed by -
the Commission for its denial, as contained in the July 9, 1976,
minutes, to be sufficient and controlling. .
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 26 day of August, 1976.
VERNON W. OHLAND
CLERK THE BOARD
B
Ros nne Montague, Deputy k
~
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,
WASHINGTON
IN THE M-ATTER CONCERNING PE-1023-76, ) NOTICE
CURRY TWO - ZE-75-76, AGRICULTURAL TO ) OF
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND/OR TWO ) pUBLIC HEARIPIG
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - CURRY, Sponsor )
1VOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners
of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public haring at
. 3:30 P.M., August 12, 1976, at their office in the County
Courthouse, to consider the above mentioned preliminary
subdivision and zone classification upgrading on property
located in:
Section 2, Township 27 N., Range 43, E.W.M.
Governmen t Lo t s 3 and 4, N 2 o f the S 2 o f the
and the SF}4 of the SF}4 of the I~~4 of Section 21
includ.ing the South 30 feet of the N[49~, of GoverrunQnt Lot
4 and the North 30 feet of the SW4 of Government 4, and the
South 30 feet of -hte Mqk of SW4 of the NW, and the Iiorth
30 feet of the S~.- of the Sj-k of the W4 and the North
30 feet and the` Ea.st 30 feet of the SW, of the SF}4 of the
NtA,-; except the W% of Governn-ent Lot 4 and the W, of the
Nk of the SW 4 of the NW 4.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN any person interested may appear at
said hearing and present testimony either for or agianst the
recommendations of the Spokane County Planning Commission.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 22 day of July, 1976.
VERNON W. OHLAND
Clerk of he Board
~
by
Ros nne Montague, Deputy Cl rc
CEIVE ~ ~E EI VED
R E
~
, J U L 13 1976
=aorl w f JuL J ! ~
CUAAY 1,,~ Cl1MITY CUMMIS.SIONERS
A27D C0.
L
i' RESL ,CAS %W4~~~ W V ~ ~ t ~ ~"V
LR23D ~ ~~N'~'y~~
~I DEYEIAPF.FiS ' ON
- N1 - -
I~
i 1i • '
EAST 9209 TRENT AVENUE ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) WA 8-0600
July 13, 1976
. Spakane County Commissioners
Spokane, Washington
Dear Sirs:
Ile wish to apneal the decision of the Countyt, Pl anning
Board on Frid.ay t11e 9th of July, regarc3ing PE 1023-76
7E 75-76, and would ar_.preci nte a hearincj as saon as
nossible.
Enclosing the fPe of $25.00.
Th ank you,
J Gordon w. Curry
- . ' _.,...~r._.. l...... a . _ . a °'T.l' w. . ~'T'__;"_.~ ~1 - _ . ' ~ r~'~ ~ r _ _ ' . . _ " • , . . . F:
EXPLAN/1TION AMOUNT
98-433
1251
GORDON W. CURRY & COMPANY U~ y✓~~~~J~-~v Mr
e' E. 9209 TRENT 928-06C0 Cy?~.•~-~,~Ge~ I-
SPOKAN E, WA 99206 0 518
P A Y D O L L A R S
.
TO THE C~DER OF DATE ReAI ESTATE EXCHI.I . LILAC CHECK AMOUNI
/
~ 1►KY `-'~~~'~i~.~ 1 '~Jl~ / ~ ~ ^ . .
GORDON W. CURRY & COMPANY
BEATTLE•F/RST NAT/ONAL BAN/f V
MI LLWOOD BRANCH / MILLWOOD . " ~
~,yl., , ...w.• ..e. . . . . ~ . , ...1.~.... . ~ ..-.-~ar^ r . • ~-.r-- ,s.~
1: L 2 5 1"10 L, 3 31: L L 58 3 10 L"'
IVIINUTES
jULY 91 1976
~
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIGN AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING
PE-1023-76 CURRX TVVO: CURRY
ZE- 75-76 AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1) or TVVO-
FAIViILY RESIDENTIAL (R-2)
Planning Corrimission Recommendation: Denv. (Vote was unanimous).
A. REASOiVS:
1. The residential density proposed by the sponsor is considerably hfgher
than that of the extsting densf ty in the surrounding area.
2. It was felt by the Planning Commissfon that the updating of the Com-
prehensive Plan would more appropriately determine the denstty for the
area.
B. STAFF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW;
As rE:iulrad fn VvAC 197-10-320, the staff oi the County Planning Commission
revfecAitdl the environmental checklist submitted by tilr. GordonVti'. Curry
for a prelimfnary subdivfsion of Curry Two. The proposal is located approxi-
mately in the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 34, Township 26 N., Range 44
E.W.rfl., just west of and frontfng Mc I3onald Road, about 1200 feet north
of 'V1lellesley Avenue. The proponent requests ta subdlvtde about 8.7 acres
of land into 24 lots for sxngle family (22 lots) and duplex (2 lots) lots creatfng
a gross untt density of about 3 units per acre. The site is located on a
relatively flat to moderately steep (l I%. slope) terrain currently covered by
productfve pasture vegetation.
The staff review has identified four potential areas of environmental impacts.
First, and common to all subdivision, is the increase in motor vehfcle trafffc
and all the effects associated therewith. These would inciude such lmpacts
as increased air pol,lution, specifically suspended particulates from
unimproved streets, increased noise, and increased public safety hazards
from traffic.
A seeond potentfal envlronmental tmpact area considered was the increased
demand on public services and utilfties. This would incLude such factors as
increased requirements for pollce and fire protection, provision of additional
school, park, and recreatfonal faciltties, and additional maintenance
requirements on all county facilittes and roads. This would also include such
Impacts as assoctated wfth extension of uti.lfty lines (power, natural gas,
telephone) and the provision of suitable long term sewerage, domestic water,
storm viafer runoff, and solid waste disposal systems.
-5-
Y 1/
PE-1023-76 CURRY TVVO. (Continued)
A third potential environmental impact revealed by the staff evaluation
involves the subsurface injection of sewage effluent and storm water runoff.
This waste water placed at a depth wi11 perco.late downward toward the
aquifer rather than evaporating back into the atmosphere as under natural
conditions. A portion of the contaminants will llkely be filtered out of this
waste water, but the resulting quality has not been determined yet. A total
of about six (6) acre feet per year of waste water will be generated by thts
proposal, four (4) acre-feet of which will lfkely be sewage effluent.
- The flnal potential area of environmental fmpact is rhe transition of land from
an active agricultural use to suburban residential. The 8.7 acre site is cur-
rently used as pasture grazing land but the proposal will change this to single
fami.ly and two famtly residential use at a gross density of three (3) units per
a cre .
The conclusion of this envfronmental checklist review is that no sfgnfficant
environmental impacts will lfkely result from the proposal. Therefore, it Ls
recommended that a Declaration of Non-Significance be issued and an environ-
mental impact statement not be required.
C. GENERAI. DATA: .
1. Location: Section 34, Township 25 N., Range 44 E.W.M.
The south 539.3 feet of the North 1650.2 feet
of that portion of the SVv 1/4 of Section 34 lyfng Eas-t of line drawn
from a point in North line of said SW 1/4 1578.6 feet East of the NW
corner; thence to point in S line of said subdivision 1579.2 feet east
of SSW corner thereof, except the S 179.76 feet and except that portfon
lyfng wfthin McDonald Road.
2. Sponsor: Gordon VV . Curry
East 3209 Trent Road
Spokane, WA 99206
3. Engineer; Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc.
North 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, VITA 99206
4. Site Size: 8.7 acres
5. Number of Lots: 24
6. Land Use proposed by Sponsor: Sfngle family dwellfngs and duplexes
7. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established April 24, 1942
8. Advertised Zone Upqradfng: Single Family Residential (R-1) and/or
Two Family Residential (R-2)
3. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation Df strict No. 3
10. School District: East Valley School Listrict
- 5 a-
~
Plan-ning CoLT-Iission
Puolic Wor'rcs Bui? dinG
N. 811 Jefferson Street
~pokane, 'J4 shin-ton
We Vne undersign.ed property ot°rners petition aE;ainst tze prQposec3
,7.pplic~tion of Gordon 7J. Curry, East 9209 Treiit Road, Spokwne
►Jaazair;ton `-ihom has f iled a -nlwt pl~n to be knoj•in as Cu.rry D-ro .
A1so 'Cae c~~.anGin; of ~.-ae zon-i;,G:, s~ap i'rorii aGricaltural to sin; le
fu-,jil.y and / or t;•ro -fau:ily residcntial on the property descr7bed
by Notice o:f Public Hearin;.
T''ne -oe titioners op-oosE suo ject develope.ment for the fo1yowin,-;
reC.sons ;
Prop@rties ad joininG propo3ed devElflpmeni, a,re utilized r"or
ae;ricUltra.l purposes.
Enviorl.eenta1 wnd ecoGoly im-oact on si-irroundinG proper "Liie3
vTOU1d r@strict itt s interzded usa-ge.
Iq.crec.sed traf~ ic on ex-istin;secondary rocad ti•Tould rEsalt- in a
l;~ con~e3t~~i ~r~ ~'fic Flo~~~, .rl~ inten~,nce costs and swf et~T :i or
~
?oresent -oroperty oryizErs.
]''he aeve? o~ei.ient duri:nm co-qstr:ic 'uion Derzod wou1d caase
enu~~.oraus inconvel1iences for s:1.rroundi~C; property oi°rrYer;, L'or
e::~elided -oeriod of ti.ble.
Adc:si L ional costs j-r~.~.l be levied u~on t.~e sc~~ool distr~.ct ior
1 ~ ~tranaaor~^tion and education-l iwc-.,'litie5.
1~7jc d.evelopement of t'lc -ouroo-ed n~~zt-L,re c;ists vrit~lin t:1iU a"ea.
~
~ •
.
' s t:in.r:; dwellincrs in t.Ze are4 are loccated on not less tLan
one ac~~e - :dos t of 1ic_z are oi1 i~.ve ~ c?^E~ or ~nore .
Dyi closYr.- we t?-ie property owners ask the Pl,").nniraG Comnission
Vo act favorably, in our behalf, , to disapprove the sub;;ect
rezoniY-~C and devel opement of -oroposed -o1at.
0~ ~ ` , ~~c.e ~ ~ ~ E
. ~
GG''~-1'~~/° ~`l~l~'~ % ~.~e.2 ~
"r4 ~ e s~ a
/3
`a~
- A-3°d YP 171 ~
~
~
C~e,.~~'
C~7 '7 Z ~ o 1-7 o
~ -
2- -7 Z i0 . ~ -2- ~ ~ QE
~ 11 C?L~' ~7- ~ ~C6-
~~~--7~
'7
, a
f 6 5-
a ~ a ~ L(/ 6 ~ ~ 2~ ~
!
j-4 L r
4 z,~
~~0C,
i- -2
~
z ~ ~
15
~ ~ ' ~ Q
~
/3/0
r'
Z,~l 7
Q
XV
c ~
7 yo ~
~ . > > 1-310'~
~ ~s.l
.~31~
~ 'I ~
n~ qy
~
• ~ . t) 6o~
e~
Xz3 /
. ~ 23-3 ~
2
s70 s ~
17)
<-r• ~ , ~
~ 11
~ , ►f~t
~ ~ .
SPOKAl`IE COUN'i'Y ENGINEER
RQAD DEPART'4EIvT
SUBnYVISiOV SECTION
T0: Spokane County A1-anning CoYnmission . DATE: July 6, 1976
FROM: ttobert S. Turner, Countv EnQineer .
SUBJECT: Standard Plat Conditions
We recommend approval of the plat of Curry Tcao PE-1023 ,
subject to the following conditions: that conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of Right of
Way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer;
that plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb
grades be submitted to the County Enoineer for approval prior to construction and
the filing of a final plat; .
that drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and aligrtment of drain-
age facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction
and the filing of a final plat; construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed
under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who sha1Z be responsible
for perpetuatiag alI evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be .
disturbed during construction and who shall furnish the County'Engineer with "As
Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to
the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed
monuments have been replaced;
no construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way until a permit,j
has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval
. by the County Engineer;
all construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing'
the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the
cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans,
and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer.
provide 10' of additional right of way on McDonald so as to widen road to 60' ultimate
right of way
the subdivider is to dedicate aIl rights o£ vehicular ingress and egsess to McDonald Road
except at street intersections.-
. ~
~
5PO~ANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTIAENT
~
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 -
July 1, 1976
Mr. Dwight Hume, Acting Director J
. Spokane County Planning Corrmission .
Spokane, Washington ,
Dear Mr. Hume:
s~ -
,
The following zone changes and preliminar.y subdivisions have been_reviewed for
adequate fire protection:
.Y : w~ ~ ♦
PE-1020-76
ZE- 72-76 - Mains and hydrants need to be-installed in this area.
.
PE-1021-76 t
ZE- 73-76 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area.
A ~
PE-1023-76 y ~ • .r ~ .
. ~ ZE- 75-76 - Mains and hydra ts,.rieed to,.be installed in this area.
~ =r • .
.
~r-~`-- ~
PE-1025-76
ZE- 77-76 - Mai ns and hydrant need tQ . be ,i nstal l ed~'i~n thi s area.
PE-1026-76
~ . ~
ZE- 78-76 - Mai.ns andi:hydrants need to,,be: i nstal 1 ed-°%in, thi s area.
~ ~ ~ -
?~`s
PE-1029-76 , _ . . , ,A~~
ZE- 81-76 Mains" and hydrants need to be installed ~n, t~iis~area. .
f~ d" 7'r '~`'s ~ y ' ~ . . i ~ _ .
s
ZE- 53-76 ppp=` 'Mai ns\G and hydrants need to be instal l ed 1n,^-this area.
~ h .✓1 } t t ,
, ~
ZE- 40-76,Y = Mains' and hydrants need to be instal1ed i'n this areae
. . _ ~ ~
ZE- 45-76' Mains and hydrants need to be installed.-in-th.is area. ~
. ~aZE- 56=76 There are exi sti ng mai ns i n thi s.area but hydrants~~ wi 11 be
needed.
~ . PRE VENT FIRE SA VE IVE J
S L S
: E co
dDe ~ ► .
y r•~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
~Inter-Offi ce Communi cation
jH
Date: June 16, 1976
T0: Spokane County Planning Commission ~ FROM: Eugene C. Prather, R.S. g
SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary Plat - CURRY TWO 1. Reference: Map of subject, scale 1"=50' by Simpson, dated June
11, 1976.
2. Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3 states the subject is within
Je__for_domeW[c,__
the Di stri ct's servi ce area and that, wa+,-_;s-au4i1ab_
~i_re protecJ.i.on_4nd i_rri-g ati on _use~upon completi on of contractual
agreements. We recommend all such agreements be completed prior to
signing a final plat.
3. The soils and topography in the lots are suitable for installation
of individual on-site sewage disposal systems.
dr
cc: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers
N. 909. Argonne Road
Spokane, Washington 99206
f , „,~a, •
'`v % Z
a
~ • s '
a• ,
^
p1.A19NING C~MNItS510N
SCND-ADM-118
#3
~TREN~W~~~ ~ ~:;<,i U . • ,
EAST 1411
i~R ~TON o99D 16 ~
KqN~. ~~9RSHIN
ltpril 19, 1976
apokaxle Cou.nty Plan Gomcris sion
C oun ty C iur tfiou s o
Spokarie, ;lashington 99201
Dear air:
Curry I°4J0 6ubdivision is in 2'rantwood Irrieation Dist-
rict No. S and water is avuilable f'or domestic and irr-
igQ,tion purposes upon instal,lation of nocossary Lain
linos and sorvice lin3s by dovelopar and also for fire
uso.
Vory truly yours, .
1'rontwood Zrrig Uist jrs
C„y `s
LJ
Socre t~~.ry.'
R
• : ~ ~ • a~..
1
_ _ . ~ i . •~as'~
~I . . • j 1 ~
` • . c ~ G ,
• i. V O ` ~ i 1 . ;1
P4
> L
ti -z
, PE-102 3- 76
~ • - :e~~;r:;.-`? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ( ~ , \ ~
t " :'i _ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
_
I I ' ~ • . - ` -
~ d
~ 'paP104
SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE
FORM FOR (PROPOSED/f'1idftt) DECLARATION
4H-F-JF.AAiC-&/NON-SIGNIFICANCE)
OF 4-S-Fr
Description of proposal Preliminary Subdivisfon Curry Two
Proponent Mr. Gordon W. Curry
Location of Proposal E 1/2, SW 1/4, Section 34, Township 26 N., Range 44 EWM
Lead Agency SpnkanP CoLntv
This proposal has been determined to "(iTave/not have) a significant adverse
impact upon the environment. An EIS (4s-/is not) required under RCW 43.21c.
030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a
completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the
lead agency.
~
Responsible Official M'r, Ray Chrf stensen
Position/Title Chairman, Board of County Commissioners .
Date Signature
(3) If the form is for a declaration of environmental significance, the
lead agency may add to the information contained in subsection (2) of this
section a listing of those environmental impacts which led to the declaration,
tcgether with a brief explanation of what measures, if any, could be taken
to prevent or mitigate the environmental impacts of the proposal to such an
extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration and issue•a
(proposed/final) declaration of non-significance. .
"E X H I B I T A"
PRP?-tMINARY PLAT APPLICATION Fc"-RM
Total Amount of Land in this Subdivision: 6• 3 Acres Acre s
Proposed Density of the Plat: app. 3 homes to the acre Lots/Gross Acre
Are a Total Amount of Adjoining Land Controlled by this Owner or Sponsor: none Acres
and Proposed Use of Controlled Adjoining Land: unknown
Distance What is the Driving Distance in Miles to the nearest Fire Station? 2 miles
Shopping Facilities? 2 Municipal Boundary? Paved Street or High-
way? 2blks
Indicate the Proposed Land Use of the Plat: ( X) Single Family Ilwellings
(X ) Duplexe s Multi -Family Dwelling Units Mobile Home s
Land Other (Describe) 2 dupl ex lots, rest singl e f amily
U se De scri bE any Non-Re sidential U se s Proposed in the Plat. none What is the Present Use of the Property Proposed to be Platted? pasture
Dc- you Plan to Flle the Plat in its Entirety as Proposed, or Will it be a Multi -Phase
Development ? enti rety
To What Level of Improvement will Streets be Constructed Minimum) Gravel
(X ) Curb & Gravel ( ) Curb & Paved
What is the Time Period Expected for Complete Development of the Plat (i.e. , Street
Improvements Improvements Completed, Substantial Percentage of the Lots Occupied?
I X Dedication of any Land for Public Use (Parks, Schools, etc. ) contemplated ?
( ) No Yes De scribe:
Indicate the Size of Units Proposed to be Constructed:1000 to 1400 Sq. Ft .
Number of Bedrooms: 2& 3
Will Buildings be Built on the Lots Before They Are Sold ?(x ) No Yes
Will any Special Deed Restrictions be Included in the Sale of Lots j Yes (X )Vo
If "Ye s Explain:
Indicate the Proposed Method of Sewage Disposal: ( X) Septic Tank Lagoon
( ) Treatment Plant ( ) Other (Describe)
Indicate the Proposed Source of Water Supply: Individual Wells Private
Community System ( 4 Public System
Indicate Method of Extending Service to the Lots (Dwellings): Utility Easements
Utilities - Underground Utility Easements - Overhead ( X) Utilities in Streets -
No Easements
Indfcate the Distance from this Proposal to the Nearest Existing Water Main: 10 Ft.
Indicate Size of Nearest Main: 14 In.
List Utility Companj.es or Districts Expected to Provide Service to this Plat:
Electricity WWC Gas WWWC! Water Trentwood phone NIA Bell
,
PROPOSED PLAT NAME: CURRY TWO
E.
Undersigned, have completed the information requesteci, and the Preliminary
Ac r~ d ~ Ct~ s been prepared by me or under my supervision ir, accordance with the require
m n~' +~=m~ s f the Spokane County Planning Commissfon and the laws of the State of
;o 9967 ton.
VIA ~ • •
(S sTER~~ (Signed) - C~ . - Date 6 1l .
Se r1lA1. (Address) 14. )0.9 P"L . Phone 9Z~ -132Z
I ,the s on s or of thi s ro s
, p p po ed subdivision, am the
) owner bu.Aq~ agent option Holder (x) contract holder of tne
property proposed o be platted; and have completed the information requested of ine
~ and do hereby testify that it is correct and ac -te.
oot
olp
104
(Signed) ~Q Date t~~ -/-fie--7,C;
~ (Addre s s) ~~2ry Zn~, I-A Phone 5;W'-06 oa
.
NOTARY Date ~G -E 3 t 2.
,
THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF ONLYr
Pl at Name : ~
.
Plat File Number: Date Submitted: . -7
Planning Location: STR~-~ Number of Lots: ~
Commission Existing Zone Classification of the Area Proposed to Be atte&:
Inforr,iation Zoning Classification Recomwnded by Staff: JZ°' C ~e
oiPreliminary Plat Fee: Checked By:
. ~ r
CLARENCE E. SIMPSON RICHARD L. SIMPSON CHARI.ES E. SIMPSON
Larertce e. Simpion engineer.4,, Jnc.
CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
Regittered in Wasbirrgton and Idaho
TELEPHONE 926-1322
OFFICE N. 909 ARGONNE RD., SPOKANE, WASH. 99206
PRELIMINARY PLAT
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CURRY TWO
The soutn 539.3 feet of the North 1650.2 feet of that portion of the
SW 1/4 of Section 34, T. 26 N.,j R. 44 E.W.M. lying East of a line drawn
from a point in the North line of said SW 1/4 1578.6 feet East of the
NW &pkner thence tm a point in the South line of said Subdivision 1579.2
feet East of SW corner thereof, Except the South 179.76 feet and Except
that potion lying within McDonald Road.
0
~ f
l~~~~~
~ . ' • A • • r~ w
• :
i U
IF `i g c • ~ ~ a `11~G ° r r ti' d Vr
. ~ ~'v,•/'f`~~01V
AGENDA, jUZY 9, 1976 :LEPHONE NO. : 456-2274
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIN~ ~OMIvIISSION - Time: F'riday, july 9, 1976, 9:30 A.ti1.
Place: Conference Room A, Court House Annex
. (Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
PRELT.hdINARY Stl'BDII'T_STON AND 7 F C;LASS n1~,T UPCRADING .
. 5. ,PE-] Q23-76 , Curry-,.Two
Z,E- 75-76, Aaricii].ttaral to Si.nale ~'ami-ly Residential (R-1) and/or Two-Familv
Residential (R-2) .
a. Loca tion: , Section 34 , Township 26 N., Range 44 , E. W, M.
. The South 539. 3 feet of the North 1, 650. 2 feet
of that portion of tne SW 1/4 of Section 34 lying east of a Iine drawn from a point
in the North line of said SW 1/4, 1,578.6 feet east of the NW corner, thence to a
point in the South line of said Subdivision 1, 579.2 feet east of the SW corner
thereof, except the South 179 , 7 6 feet and except that portion lying within
McDonald Road,
b. Sponsor: Gordon W. Curry
East 9209 Trent Road -
Spokane, tiVashington 99206
c. Engineer: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc, .
. North 909 Argonne Road
. Spokane, Washington 99206 .
. d. Site Size: 8.7 Acres
e. Number of Lots : 24
f, Land Use proposed by Sponsor: Single Family Dwellings and Duplexes g. Existing Zoning: ' Agricultural, establi.shed April 24, 1942
h. Advertised Zone Upgrading: Single Family Residential (R-1) and/or Two-
Family Residential (R-2) ,
i. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District No, 3
j. School District: East V:alley School District
• SANSON AVE EL_ 2041!~,f:. s
. V~ • •
O , ~ . •
. . O fl. ~
w'
0 ~ Y~
J
. 1 WRT-W , Z W 1~.
~ °
. o . w 4t
VI ~ , W . Z ' Q•
~ o,
= loDO,
1NELLESLEY AVE (136w1E P, • ~ ~ Y
{ ~ .
nt • ~ . - , r • ' • • ' ,;.1:,~.
• ' ' . MEHtOY .
ROY
• ` % . I i
;i'"; • ~►.ticrttil.ovrt+,+ .
F~t
~ ` ;~i~~ne P/on7`e C~7
3
/..~~j►-y Si te Q - • - i w
Pork o ~ . .
. , ~ a>
R~c
RtCH t-+ avF ~ W
. . ~ • y _ -w~ if • .
. -5- . . . .
~
PE-102 3-7 6& ZE-7 5-7 6
In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Gordon W. Curry, East 9209 Trent
Road, Spokane, Washington to file a plat to be kia C Two. Also to consider
- aN o{
changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to A~ rem on the property described
below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats,
of such property. The property being platted is described as the South 539 , 3 feet of the
Norrh 1, 650.2 feet of that portion of the SW 1/4 of Section 34, Township 26 N. , Range 44,
E.W.M. , Spokane County, Washington, lying east of a line drawn from a point in the North
line of said SW 1/4, 1, 578.6 feet east of the NW corner, thence to a point in the South line
of said Subdivision 1,579.2 feet east of the SV1T corner thereof, except the South 179.76 feet
and except that portion lying within McDonald Road.
(West side of McDonald Road, approximately 1/4 mile north of Wellasley Avenue.
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE 4F Ir1ASHINGTON )
) SSo
COU111TY OF SPOKANE )
Being first duly sworn, dePosee and says:
That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United
States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one
years o
That on 19 40ho personally posted three (3) true
00
and correct copies of the hereto attaclied NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the
following places in Spokane County, to-wit:
2 a
3e ,
Subscribed and sworn to me
~ 19
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKA.NE COUNTY, WASHING7 TN
Residing at Spokane, Washington
•
RECE16 Dcaito f 1/51 19 471)Received Frvm
Address ~ 9' zo
F)oliars
For . ~
AcCaU~,T ~ 14Ow PA~~ S~~~~ ~rTarrrG
~r~z c~ ,~~r~
A[C~3UNS c
I
,ar,K7, PAID ~ CwEtK
6AlAIvCE pNEY ~r
~ d~1€ 7 - ~
BK906 q9a-~m
~
i
~ ~
~
Yvu ~re h~reb rn~t~fi~~d ~~ra~ ~r~ ~~~AY, •
JU~Y 9, 1976 t~'~ ~'~~r ~:3Q A.M.
o~f ~~i~ ~day in C~n~~ren~ce Rc~~m 1~, ~~ll~r~ 14~~n~~ ~n-
~r~~~~e, ~p~kan+~ ~Cvur~ty~ ~~~urt ~~u~e 14nr~~x, ~po~an~,
1~1'a~hir~~t~r~~ Th~e ~P~~CAIV~E C~3UN~'~' P~~1~~Ifi~IN~G ~~3l~lN~~~~
"~W~II C~~+~IJCt ~1 ~~~~IC ~~~~'I~'1~ ~~~vs~r~~~ TxE ~~zrc~~~~r~ o~
~+~RDC~~I W. ~~J~RY, ~iST 9~~9 '~~E~T ~c~Al~, S~' (~KANE, VVAS~H~N~T~N TC~ ~'I~ A ~~AT '~C~ B~
~~T~~NI~ A~ C~JR~ 'I'V4~(~. AL~C~ C4~~ST~~~ ~~IAN~IN~ THE Z~NfN~ MAP ~'1~~~ AGF~Ct~LTT~RAL
T~ Si~`GLE FAI~~IT~Y ~~iD/~7~ T~+~JC~ F~MILY RESTL~~NT~L ON 'I`~~ ~~~P~RT~ I~ESC~I~~~ BEL~7~N, SUC~I
Z~NE ~C~I~P~GE Tfl B~~~I~E ~~FE~TI~IE C~NLY UpON T~~ F`I~IN~ C~F A FI1~AL PI~~', C1R ~LATS, ~f
~iJ~C;~ P~PE~,~'~,'. T~i~ ~P(JN~~R Pf~aP~SE~ T~ L~I'~DE T~IE PR~F~~TY INT~ ~4 L~~'S FC~~ ~~riGL~
F~M~LY ~N~!,/0~ '~V~TC~ F~~ViILY L~4"~E~T~ING~. ~'E-10~3-7~ an~ ~~'-~5-7F
Ger~~rt~1 ~e~~r~pti~r~ vf ~r~e~: S~cti~n 34, "~ownship 26N.~ Ran~e 44, E.~,M.
~'h~ ~~ut~ 5~~.~ f~et ~f t~,~ I~o~~ Y, 65Q.~ fe~t that port~~r~ ~f th~ ~W I/4 af ~~~~ic~n 3~,
T~wr~s~i~p ~6N., Rar~~~ 44, E.'W.M., ~~~kan~ ~our~ty, VVa~h~n~t~n~ ~yin~ ~ast a lin~ ~rav~n ~r~m
a pQ~nt in t~~ ~i~rth line o~ s~i~ S~f 1,~4, 578. ~ f~~t ~~s~ of the 1V~ c~~~r, ~hen~e t~ ~ point .
~r~ the S~~th ~in~ ~f s~fd ~ubd~~ri ston 1, 5? 9,~ fe~t ~a st of t~~ SW c~rrrer th~r~~f r~x~~pt t'~~ Sc~ut~
,~79.7~6 ~e~t and ~exc~pt ~h~at p~r~ic~r~ ~~r~ng w~t~in iv~~~~nald Ro~d,
~N~st si~e c~f i~ricI~~na~ld Rc~~d~ 1p~II`~}~Lt~lat~l'~ ~.,I~ ri11~f~ 1~~3'"C~1 tlf W~l~.~sley ~ver~u~.
F~~ FURTH~~ DE~A~I~~ ~~r~tp~~ ~h+~ ~p~ka~ne ~~r~r~~y
~ ! M i ~ *
Pl~r~r~~r~~ ~~m~n~~~~~n~ Pu~lrc W~r~~ ~u~~d~~rg, I~I* 81~ J~ff~r-
sor~ ~tr~et~ ~~r~~Ca~r~~, ~I''ashin~t~~.
/s~ Dwigl~t Hum~ A~tir~~q Director ~f Planning
~p~kaae ~~auni~ P4ane~ng ~ommis~ion
FORM 949 PLIfG. C~7MM, 8•~~
16.4
P-0 - - - - . - - - -l_~~~---- - - ~ --L
_ _
~
. , _
.
- 1- - ~ ~ - - - -
- • -
~
- - - - - - ~ _ ~ - - • - - - - - - - - + _ - - - - -
~
~ ' - - • - - - ~ - - ~ -
- - - . . -e- - - - ~ - ¢ ' - ~C . ~ - - - - - ~ - -
toodAA
_
- _ - - - - - - - t _ _ - _ _ . . _ ~ - - - - •
. `
~
- _ _ . - _ ~ , . , - ~ - - - -
-6~ - - _ . - - . ~ ~ - -
~
- 1~ - - - - - - - - - - - - pt
~kj_ _
- - - - - - - ~ ` - -
• - - - - -
- - - - - - - - _ , ~ " -
- - - - - - - _ _ . . . - ~ '~0~~~ - - - - - ~ - - °
° ° - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - , . . . - - - I - -
s
AA A-k
/0~ jy_
- - - ~
j~oot
~ --P ~ ~ - - - - - - 6mew , ~ -
- - • _ - ~ - - - _ - _ •
4~2
Zu' . . - - a - - - - - - -
~ - - - - - - - - - wo
~
- ~ L _ ~ _ - - - - - - -
404 - - - - -
- ' a - - , - ~ !~11~~' _ • -
. . - - - - ~
.
U., 0
- ~ •
.
~ • -
'
040
PO
~o
1 ~
~
•
.
~
~ • a
~ ~ ,
Prr. (034- u ~ ~ ru.*4
_ - - - ~ - - - - -
- -i - . - - ~ - - ~
- ~ ~C~~d~~~ ~
ob F+o MaA .
i6
60ort4i
~ - - . _ ~~t~l _ ~o~► _ _ AV . U~► .
io~ ° - P64LJOMJ
o~
- - • , . ~ _ ~ _ ~ _ _ .
- - -
- ~ - - - - . . .
- - - - _ - ~ - - _ .
4b
4 '
~ - -
_ J ~.I • I
~
Application . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pa nent and Receipt . . . . . . . .
Lega1 Descrintion . . . . . . . . . .
- • Five (5) Plat Maps .
Two (2) Parcel Maps . . . . . . . . . ~
Assessor's Map . . . . . . • • • • •
FIealth District - Memo . . . . . . .
Water District -Lctter . . . . . . . K•~1,~j
County Utility Department . . . . . .
Envirorunental Checklist . . . . . . .
REVIEW PRUCESS:
Deliver Preliminary Plats To:
Eugineers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ! ~c~P,
IItili tie: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . j ~
Fiealth District . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . /
Incoz•porated Gities, with deadline 1ett;er
State Highway, with deadline lettez.• ~
Check Lega1 Description . . . . . . . ~
Zoning Determination . . . . . . . .
Ordinance Compli.ance . . . . . . . .
Old Plan Review . . . . . . . . . . .
Road Alignment & Stub Street . . . .
Ownerships . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
Slope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lot Sizes . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Existing Land Use Pl.an . • . • • . • ~
Check Comprehensive Plan . . . . . .
Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
Engineers' Memo . . . . . . . . . . .
Fire District Memo . . . . . . . . .
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . ~
Environmental Checklist Review . . .
Threshold Determination . . . . . . .
Agenda Maps . . . . . . . . . . . . . '
Proof Read Agenda Page . . . . . . .
Post Notice of Public Hearing ~ ,
SPECIAL REQUIREMFNTS:
' . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
► I ~~+~2~`'~7 ' . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
~ r • • f • • • • • ~ • • •
~ 5
f
~ • • • • ~ • • • ~ • •
• • ~ • • • • • • • • ~
~
' + ~
+
d
~
~d Q
~n
' 54-:26-
4.4
e7
, ~ ►
p
l?, 7/0
/
l
r Od~
/2j 6,71
,
131D¢9
~
o ~
. ~ .
~
~
y y 4:5' 25 Z~ ~
QCk ~
/
~ W~
~oc,~ ~ 'ry
.
ol r
. ! ~ •
r ~
~ ~ ~s,~~.
571.1 740, t7
,~'7. C." 8 ~ .
5 ~'2 ~ ~ 0
9
.
r ~
, 8 7 G
, ' 3 .
in ~
.
.
9/0., 4 ~
,
8Z
it ~
gs,
~ -
, , .
ft?
~
. . •
~
u ~
5 e ~
ro 0
,
„ 26_ .
~ .:7 .
~~~-~•:1,~ . - ~ il~~~ ,
rA~ 1 _ ~ .
~ ~ 3X,.! ~ I~?, 0Y 9
8:5 rj i`.JJ~ P~ l~ ~ ~j~• ~ ~/J~t:a /
lack l ~
~ ~
. . M ~
\ ? I ~ ~ I ~ 5 L I
10,
UZ
I L , ~
~
71R,G - . _
~ . ~ • i c ~ . ~ . . O
7il •G
~ J` . • R. N ~ N
• Ir
~ G J 8 Z, J V V
;z0
~ ~ ~ a 8 7 G 5 r~ 3 1
. ~ ~
, a ocG
~1 85 8. 8 Z 8 B
1-5?. •
, ~ . ~ . • ' . ~ ~
/04B-G
; a~ ~ ~
~ ~lol?
r
~
Pmpo.5ed " ° ,
~
~
. ,
34 2(v d4
I:z 7!0 ~
r, r p~ : l',J~: I
I J
%5•r~ J.~i ~ , ~ ? - f r
~
~
L. .,.li s
h
gloCk l ~
~ ~ ~I~ ~ .
~ .
, t , ~ • ' , ~ , ~ ra 5,
~OG.3 ca ~2 ~ ez
~ , , ._M___
7Af.6
~ • . 1\I,~ r. ' ~ ' . ~
c-s z
,~o .
0
~ . 3 ~ ~ 8 7 G 5 ~1 ~ 2 1
1
tn
, ~
. ~ ~
. . /o ~ ~ .
~/oc.~ . d c
,~5 ~ 85 $Z ~
sz
, p •
i .
~ REc:LIvEo
. ;
=
. `E B 0 8 1977
2
J ' ' . .
. 4 ,
J
JJJ TfIT; svPER.r_pR C'UIJR'i' OF T3iI; S`.l:`A'.L`L UF !~ln„~Il ! il<<'L`~'?i a
6 T.i~~ ~1IJll }?Ua7 '.L'I[.l_; COUM'I"Y O;I:' SPOICAHI':
. ~r TfiEODORE T~~STER, M1Z.4't Ml:S )
KI:NGREY, MR. S: NI175 . LARSdRI, )
a r~IR.& MRS. TI RI< , MIZ.& MRS. )
OLGARD, 1,111. & N1I:S. I3UUJM11N, ) 1\10 9 MR. & MP5. `.CAYf,OIl, P=1R.
N[ R S. W.£ ; N ZEL, Pi R. & P•'t )
10 i"JIZIGEiT , 'LlITt. & MRS. G4001~)COCt: , ) MR. F< TY1RS. JO1', Mlt.& r1S ltS . )
11 COk'FEX, N1R. & P•ZRS. l1A:L'G1jr.I', } PE`I'IT1GN 1•'OU
LAURA MELLICK, nNU Ria'1'H ) 0E' RL;VTB1~7
12 GRUEtVNERT, )
Pe ti tioner s, ~ 13 vs. ~ .
BoARD oF couNTY COMM'1_ s , i: oNr:P,: ; ~ .
14 U i:' S L' O KANL'' C O U L~! Y, V1A: ; I i_C N C,;'.l' U Cd ,
) 15 RG'SpoJ1dc~11 L. ~ . .
16 The }?cti tioner_ s abovc namcrl, Uy -tlleir aL-t.r~r.li,.,1 , :•1~; t' L},7 J1C~ ~~iii~
t•dorth-iizgton, petitian thc COLit L pLizsuan-t -to statufrc, ia_e zi t•Ir.i_ l. o~
. l~ ReviPw of thE f Findings clI1d Orcler I1lade and en tered by the rc span(;,.:.~)0,
19 the Eoard of Caunty Commi.ssioizers of Spokane Coun -ty r 1-Ql~-~shi.ngton, oc,
llecErnbler 9, 197 6 , in pr. oc:ccc:tings entitled, "I?x.-e1_iminary P1 ct t
20 :Ciroposerl anc~i Zane Clc~ss.~..f_:i_cal_.i.on up~lradiiicl P1~:-~_k 23A--7c~ C;ur_-~; r)
21 Subda.vis.ion: 2L-75-76, ~-lcjri.cul.Lu.ra1_ -to SincyJ_c l':1;1`i]_ ~%::;:i r{,.~►c.~: .
C-ordon 1.11, -Curry" c"lI1d zcspc:cLL-u1_ly shows i:ht.:-~ courC.:
22 .
~ . .
23 Tne in'tezes l-. of the. pe-titiarzcr Ted 'I'est{~.~r is ttiz-it o l ~1
24 property owmer inumcdiately contig«ous and i-iort~f-i of the praposc2c1
25 pxopert_y. `''hE balance o.C thc petitionErs arc to Lh(_
pxoperty wlzich i_s the subject ot -tllis lzwsui~, G+.le owriiiig C}.rc~~~~~r-t;•
2-6 tlitlZin one mile. Tnat the peLitionc:,r_ was agct
27 affectea by zespUndEnt's r'inc7iny:.; Eiiicl Orc1o~_r_ qt:c-1nl.inc.j %Q11r:
28 r_ ec;:lass i.f_icati_an zizcZ cJ.ran I--.i_n~~ apL Lla.miiZa.ry p.I_aL: r1`ii t.t L th-..
. grantinci of the c~pplir:ati.on was affcGtE'.d c•aith variau-s. crJ-ors of:
2g
l.aw in that -the S-ta-te r,2°]VI.X'Uni[1C11tZl Policy Arl~ wii:a riut cornp.la.c(I
30 v ; ith, as hereinaf tcx' mn.rc par ticulax .l_y se t.f:orE:h , zincl t:;.l,:~ r: 1:1ir
ra.ghts oF the pe ti tj_olic.r° havc -tlicrc:by ~.~Gen
32 PLTITION FOP. WPI'.[' -
UF REV IEfl- 1
WOf:TNItJG7QPd 8, lYOf-1T111.'a'iir'01:!
n rrrr:sJE'rS nT LA'1'i
E. nEZ ~ sr~~Ar,uF nvE.
srcK v.nsH,NcYVv
^~zc~
,
~ - ~
:
. ~
~ • . _ ~
• „
rrh e actiO!~7 c~f tll~ ]~ca{lrd o:.F County Cornm.i.:~.3ic~n~:r~;
- upon uii1cawful pro(~edureY J.n U~iat: '
~ .1. T h ~ ~oarci of CaLlt~Ity .
& C_'t-;1.(=7n Qt/1i~ ~ .
~ th e z~r-i tn 9 c ha n c~~ ~~i-t D~ec ii-ab n t 9 ~ I_9 7 0' 1~•lei,`~ ~~~l; ~ r~ cr~~~;a~~ ~.:k ~f7~,« i~~~ ~
~
~
~
~ t~o' S ~~£~t e Li~v~~rvt~i~c, 1~.-~.c~I. Pn~._~~r;r Ac~ i_n Lll~~l_,
~Ui:r.~.~~~~olcl cZc,LoriTiina+:oll LiF; ~[C_Lj-t0~~Lr-,ci 1,)y ~,,]I!C; 197--10-3100; P)7- ] f?-E); i
197-10--3110 "was r~ut coi,Hp l~~te-d hy -Lhe Lime of- Llac,
"i action.Specifica'lly iVAC 197-1_0--340 (l) st~~~els: leatd ac-i-icy
~ making a thres1io1d dcte:rm_LnaLion of nan--s_i.gnifa.c:alice far aii}° c~t'
the :Eo11ow-~~g proj)c~~~~ sha1 l prcl-5ax~c ra propo ;cd
9 non--significance...priOr tO L-.aJ~:i.YLq any L--c, r_ Che-r
10 ' proposal, -
I 2. Alternativej_V, thc proposer1 declt~,ra.Lic)t7 0f
caL A L. e i.7 i1 4 1f al-'L d, 3 L 4.,5 _l. i C.I1 1 Lk V ViLA f bL- l.. GA Usk.r i 4 j. -s sbLi 4~ d on
~ C,J ' • ~
fin ding of fact, niade upoi~ un1ziwful pxocedu.re, aff ect~rd b:~ ~~r u _i.L;
13 0f law az-id ,beinc.~ c1~~rly erroneous, and thaL thef.C %:ZAS ti`..LIJ-1.11
14 rlisrepxe s en{vc-t tJ.on o r - w:~1_ f u1 1_ack o1= f Li.i.l. JI,J.st~ 3-c r_ria ~fIt; I
I ~ .
of the proponei-~L 4F Gorcloiz C. Cux:ry ~i_n tha-L LIiL• tsr4~~_3~~~-~s-acc~~•r`_:s:~ .
15 Cl-reckii~L was iZOt PrcTD,1--r_-1y ai-ic~~ accurate-ly Complc:Lcra. .
- 16 3 . `I'he Bc~ard o1"- a.
Co~_ir~~v Cc~riiiixii ssio~cz~s s~~c~~u.l_c:~ f'u t 1_
l~ environm~nta 1irnpac k. sta-Lentent as rc-quired by RCW 43 _21C_0-31-0 in
~
tha-t this propased subd_i.vis_ion cons,titutes Et xrEajc~r aCyti'3I1
I
j Signif icantly affectii-icj the qu~~ ~ Ly ol the cr~~iron~~~ncU.
20 Thafi in cause nurnber 236114, be.ing Thecdo.i:e Tc:~~er,
, vs, T3oard ~ounty COMMI;s101Icx-5 c~f Spoj~~ne, Caunty,
21 • 1
, respondent , a cornpanio}n cc-tse., the petitiQners 17avo paid for bh(-,
22 cas t of transcription o'f al1 r_ ecoxcls' iri pr. occedl_ r~gE- -L cJ.c.i~ t:1 1:
- 23 ~o these premises, azid thc-refor~3 sk~o-uld not bo o r_ dercl-d -I.11
'
~ cause to ~~u~~~.ic~ate th ~ e~:~~erzs e .
~r Whereforer pe-t..tioiiet° 2Drays tfiat a Writ af
25 directl a~i the x-es~on:~r~riL - -
. ~ ~ , ' t- ..he Dot'~Z'd C_3,f. CQunL~'
• Spakane County, Washingtor La x,~ithdraw `i ~s proj.acatied
- . Of r10n-Sj.gr1if -1_CC-LnCe a.n t17e r;~atLer of ttte Curry 11 i:a -i_~.~~~ _
_ 27
- I n a cZ di tio n , the c o u rt stio u 1 d cs
LrocL t hc- or
sw ~ O Mnl ass1 oi`1 ers t o requi. re ci Eu1 l c 37 v 11 cYi me t i tal sLaLr-Y• T-.xnd-- £_t S,
29 xequired f_or ai:L r1iaj o.r action s sign_i, f:i.can rly a~`Pc~cir._f_nq
- ~
environ~ent. Als0 thc-~ C-YcLian of Llic Co-Lir,ity
30 - . •
- Spokan~ ~ourzt_y should, ~De rulcd, inva1_;i_c:1r iiul_l_ and VO.iti
33. for.ce and effect. ThaL tl-ic rcco.i_d in cau::LY'.• Ill.l![;E:oj- -)~1)_i. 1A l~s 2
32 II P1;.TI1lON FOR X•Vr,,1raL _
OF REVIETI - 2 - wrOMTHiMcTnN
fti,"T TC3 f'. h1 F't' a AT!_ rW
' - Cz, 6Sp1G nt~ ~rylJ~`Gt~e- {,;,F.
' 4~tG d P I. 41'f'•:7 345
, ,`i'POi+;.lkh:~, VIA`_}Hi."lG31U.N
_ -~r-.....r..----- . . .Y.~. - - • - - °
~ . .
r-
1T1 thi..'a CaUSG . ,
2 ~ .
t'.!UP.`.C'!-i:l:NG`.L'ON t~ t~d~P'.i't11.!•~~-~`J.'~J~~!
r • '
~ 13Y : -
6
~ 5 IZn S s
tlttoi ney,; for
~
~ STATE OF 4JASi-il"NGTON
. ss .
~ COUINTY OF .S PQI<ANE ) .
9 , TlZeodorE TEster 1Dciiig firs-t c,tuly skaorn v►1 of-ti_Ii c7cposc:f-;
10 ancl says : . ~ .
11 That he is one cF hc petition~r~ in tllc f.orec{c»_n~~ ~lc t.rc~}n ,
.
that -the affiant ia auL-lio.rized to act for aiia ozz-behalt oJ: ai:11
~
Z`~ petitioners in this causE, that he hZS read t}ze 1--Icti_tiosz for
13 Writ of RPVie`d, knows thE cantents tlZercof ancl veri].y 10eliev,c_-::
the -same to be tzue. ~ . ~
14
15 -
. .
16
17 SUBSCRIl3ED A[VD SWORN TO ucFoxc me this day of Felba uLtr_!T, 19,7a .
. , r . . ~
' . " ~ ~ . . r~0'I'AKY ~'Uk~I,TC zn a.t~c.~ .~c~.r_ ~i~l~e ~ tat`
• of t•Izshing-ton, itesidi_i-ig a t LSpr.A.Gti1c
. . _ .
20
nj . ' - ~ -
~ , .
2
23 ~
24 . - ~
25 , , . . . . . .
26 ~ -
. .
27 ~ -
,2 , .
.
. ~ ~ . . -
~ 30
31 ~
32 P.CTSTI0N FOFZ IvlZIl.T .
. OF REVIEW 3 • SYOHTMIiVGI'O`l-t, wonzMIUcr-roM
• ATYC?Fltlc.YS Ai" LtNt'!
r-. ef316 ::b'i2AGW: ZAVE.
(5043) sPoKArV~, :^Jn-.H'i=<3r,'r0N
~
~~zaJ
.
. . . . . r 'Y
U ~ ~
~~~a~~ ~~3~~~pr~~~ ~~sT ~z JG~ _~I_~~+ E 5 ~C . ~ ~
? SP[1KA~f~ C[~~~TY ~~A~. ~~NJ FI~.~ J ~ / ~
L
P~IRC~L C~C~CU~tEI~I" - ~ ~ c!! t' RT t~~V P" 1'Y T x~4'~ER ~►UrN~E~ r~~1 B~R ~55E5S~Q ~~rN~~~ G L GES~R~ ~ ~ ~ ~~c A
~
3~+643~~~~ ~:~~fi~~~ ~1l~MPtl~R~1fS ET ~ ~ti 44 ~~C9FT Q'~ ~ik1~PHf~~~'S ~ARR~~! RAI~H 1 F
r~~~r~ a~ s~r~i~ ~~c~ raa~; ~~~~~r r~~c~~r c~~ ~v~~J~ a~~ w~~~~ n~ ~~~~ia ~o
T~~ S~1J4 ~ E~tC w~~~v o~ ~w~ s~~~Fr: ~~cc co ~~n~a~ ~~~~a~~ r~~ ~~~t~
_ ~ ~ ~ T r ~ ~ ~~~~~~a ~ ~ ~ur~R~~~v ~ ~ ~ ~~~z~ ~ ~
~ ~f F~7~ Ff~ fi~ F~ 4 F S 1~ ~ ~T~1 FT E~F S R "~1 4 M ~NA ~f~~.2 Y 1 f!! 0 W~ C~~~ W C(~ 5 15 C D R~
- - S~C f~ N TQ ~L ~f S4I! !4 1 ~7~.~Fr ~ ~F ~1J4 C~R ~F S~C ~ A'LG ~~~KANL~ I~A 9~2~6
~V! []F ~~1114 1~'~~.4FT M/L Tf] ~T t+~~T W~F ~E Cf~R SW114 5~LG
~ LN 1~~T ~ PA~ ~d ~l 5~114 T~ 5L ~f SE~C 1~FT I~ ~F 5~ C~R _ ~W~/* w3~5~.~~T P~~
~ Y Y_ .I a.
4r ~~~~~-wa~~~ ~ir~e~~c w ~ ~~~~~T~~~~~ s~~~.~~~ a~ ~'~s~~~ r~~D~t~~~ ~a
_ . ~ . ~1111i~~~FT [!f Elo'~~.~f`d' ~f ~w~14 E%C Ct7 RD T'Al( ~~~I~PTi~N ~ 5~~5 ~1C [~l7NA~~d ~
= P~IRP~S'~5 '~NL'~ S~[~1~ANE ~92Ib
;
3~b~~-~o~~~ ~~t~B~~C w ~ C~+~~SrE~SE - ~ 4~ ~2~~.7F~' ~F ~~Sfi~~ T~EQ~a~E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~f.
~ N~11C. F1' t3~ _~,~~~.BFT ~1F SW114 E~C~ ~Q ~i3 N 5~~~ ~I~ D~hIAI~ ~ SP~f~~~dE W+~ 9921~5
L
. 34b43-~Cb~3 51C8~,3~ w R C~I~I~T~I~SE~ 34 ~6 44 5359.~~ [~F C~RtST~NS~N ~M R
~ Nl~~t~}.5' ~i~ E1~~~,~' ~F S~ll1~ ~xC ~D ~8~1 PIN~~IR~ C1f~
~ SU~! C~~Y A2 '~5~51
4f
3~b~~-446~ 51U8~3C 1~ R C~iRi5TE~1~El~~,, 3~+ Z~ ~44 Si~9.T' ~F ~A~LQwf T~EC~O~E r_
PI1~5C.~' ~1~~2.~" tlF St~Il4 ~~cC 5~51~ PI~I~S R~ '~~~+!(ANE ~92~f~
- ~
~~rb~~-9~~~ 7~+3b'~4~ C~ENNIS L~II~LF 4~6 44 ST~P ~.AN~ ib'~.4~~ 4~~7~,F (~~1V!vI5
~ F P T t~ Y ~~I R~~ M~ T 7 1~ , 1~~ A0~ 5~~ ~ L~ S 114 L~~ G L~ R t5 '~~~i ~IC ~1~NA~D R
~W~G~ TO PT ~a?9.~F~ F~F S'~CQR SP~~,~NE ~IAS~ ~ 9~4~1€~
~ ~ ~
~~b4~-Q~~i~ 5b7~4~~ R~~7l~NHAM 34 4b 4~I4.~9~IC S2 A~ CIL~NH~~! R~~~R~ ~ I~r F ~=G 7~A ' ' r~ S S F~L 'P~'h~ ~F S~1 Si~ll 15 .2 E~~ SN ~.~R ~C T~t E 129~7 W~~IE. ~LE~
N r~ N L~f S~~/4 15~~~~' '~~I~-Cl~~ T~! ~i~'S2.4' z~l 5 T~ PT SP~Ii~AH~4 41A ~~216
~ ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~C~~.~ ~~]F P~F TH 1~1~~~.~ T~ P~;~ EXC E~(~ ~]F 55_~.~ ~ E?~C
wl~~' ~°F 53~~' ~ ~~t~ ~U
t
- F C F~ ~~a~a i~~a~~~ ~c z~ ~~~~r a~ s~~~.~~~ ~ur~ ~~~v~~
~o~~ ~ri~.~~ s~~i~ a~ sr~~~~ ~ ~~~~rs~~~ 1~~9.~FT ~ OF S~1~ ~l~ 5EC ~`~i ~ T~ ~~L ~l~ S~114 5~~.6f F~~~ 5PC~44d~~i~ ~~4 9~~Ib
WC 1 ~1J4 CC~ T~ EI~S~,~~T TH S~~ PT~~+~,~.~~~` ~~F P'~~ TH ~~~~~.~FT
T~ P0~
-
' 4 ~ 7 ' t~Ld~ES 3~+ ~b ~4 ~5 C?F ~2d~ A~ ~W~SH 1~1~T SAY ~K 3~r~b ~ 053 4Dt ~~~C G t~C
' F~~, ~T C'~ EI1~ 0~ ~W114; B~G ~ST~.~FT SW C~R ~F S~C TH ~1~~1~114~(?~~ ~ ~ - , 1 ~ f~' ~ - c ~
~ r~ ~ sw~~4 ~~~'~.~~r _ ~~~a r~ ~~~~~.:.~Fr T~ ~
~5~. ~Ffi ~ c~F ~~7~ rr~ wic~~~.~t~T fi~ ~~fr~~rl~~ ~~u~~~s~~ 1 ~fvLY
~
' ~~~643-9i~53~ ~r~D17~~C G H~I.F~~S ~4 ~6 44 ~~AC 0~` S~~AC ~~,SH !~U~ SAV ~I~
' 14. G 57~4 ~ Fal~ P1 E11~ S~1 1 .~FT S4~ C~l~ ~1F ~EG I~ ~I ~0 r~2C1~114~~7~ - ~ -
~ L~F 5w11~ 157~.6~~ f~F ~l! CaR TH ~1~5~,~Ffi TH 5 T~
i~~Z.BFfi ~ OF ~~S T~f w1~5~,~FY ~~B ~
346~4-~3~~ ~rb~~l~~ ~A~IE 5 W~E~STEk ~ f,~~t~i I~~ P~ 4~I~? . SL~l3~c~ ~bI~A~O .1
~ ~ F ~ F N L R a ~X~ !V1~FT ~ ~1c~ W~~FT ~~(C ~ ~ T ~ ~~(C ~1t~~F1` 0~ 411~~~T ~F ~ ~3+~~ C a0 A ~
r J~l1R~[1L 1~C~~ ~7~5r T - - ~ - - - - _ 3 . . _ _ . ~ _ ~ a _a- - - ~ ~ _ - -
J ' L~~~ 34b44-C3~3 ~4~~158 ~~kARU J~l~hi~'~h ii F!4R~1 R~t TR P 4 °~7 ; ~ ~ L ~ SLQ~t~A El~~idR~ J
~ ~~~(~F~' ~F ~l~ ~F~ ~ x5~ ~ ~ t~ 5 T P~ 5~Q6~ ~I~
5P~1~tAt~~ ~A ~q ~ n ~ly
~~c~~~c~~~~ ~ ~ vt~~~~ ~ ~~~r~~ r~
~~u~t~~~~~ sE~ ~*`t.,~~r ' ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ,
- ► ~~'N~ , ~ ~ ~~~e ~ c ,~r ~ c ~ 2QG~►~78~9C
~4~4~4-~~~~~1 ~'4C~24~~I3 ~ H ~C QLl~ARY ~P F~,RM~ ~I~'~ ~'~R P~. ~i r~ ~~L ~T~G v
~ c~ ~ ~ 5 ~ T T ~1 ~~a ~ ~~~~F ~'3~~.2~T E~~ ~f~QFT , z . ~fi
.
~~+b~4-U~41Q ~~~#~~C ~ D 1A~5~hi W FA~M R , 5 ~ ~ T~ P~. ~ L ~N C ~ S ~ l Q ~
~ KR~ ~ 513~FT ~f N3~~~T C~F ' ~5~. FT r;~_ { - "~3 ~l ~l~C W?OFT ~'~~177b ~
~46~r4-Q4~35 ~~~21b9 E L S~I~~'~ W F4R~S ~~t#~ T~
~~C 1ST F~~ 5~L 5P~ . E3~~~:F~ ~F ~~S~.~FT ~1.~~ E~~ ~1~~3~FT 13 1~'3~57
~
~ 3~6 IN~U1' ~~~t~~ P~k~C~55~~: C~~~~SPC~NpIi~G P~4~CELi51 F~ t~ ~J ND ~ I~ I ~
~
k1 ~4 ~ A T A~CIr ~p A. I~PU~ ~ARD5 ~AR ~.S P _ ~E ~~i~fi LI~E~ HH ~t~ S~ ~ [ ~y
~ ~1 ~ ~~~~JJ i~~VQ j~ ~ V i ~~~lY ~
4 C~ _
~
i
~~~~~Ar al~
f~~ P ~~►Nfl~ ~~~~Ft~' ~
flY~h~ ~~~S~I~ ~'R~ ~~Ff
, ~ ~
~ ~Y;_
~
I
~
~
~
l
- ~ - -
~ ' ~