PE-1137-77
AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 23, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-22; a
SpOKANE ~cOUTNTYI ►'LANG COMMISSION ~ . ~
Time: Friday, September 23, 1977, 9:30 A,1✓I.
Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex
(Use Mailon Avenue entrance)
PREL.IMINARv SLT_BDTtTTSION AND ZQNF r,T.ASSTFTCATjQN TTP(-,R-ADIN G • 7, PE_LJ 37-77 Lpor3 C,mILL .
ZL- 148-77. Aqricultural Suburban t~ Sj,uggle Family Residential
a. Location: Section 18,Township 25 N.,Range 44,E.W,M. _
• The N 1/2 of the S 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the
SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 lying west of the prolonga--
. tion of the ea s t line of Lots 6 and 7, Block 1 of
- Dorn Addition.
b. Sponsor: Wesley Crosby North 1506 Pine s Road Spokane, WA 99216
c. Surveyor: S enske and Ma sgai , P. S.
East 9723 Sprague Avenue
' Spokane, WA 99206 d. Site Size: 1.1 S Acres
e. Number of Lots : 4
f, Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings
g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban, est. December 29, 1959
h.* Advertised Zone Upgrading: Single Family Residential
i. Water Source: Washington Water Power Company
j. School District: West Valley School District
k. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
_ whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact
' , • 7 -C~ _ ~ ~ - n
( . ~ ; w • ~ ~Jf67ij11a ~
. ~0 1 ~ u 1 , i r' • IiZ: v•y.
. . " :r o'O •T'a = ,i"y~ _ r t..~
a o / f = et ~_.<J
c
C J w ~ . ]MMMO'V
_ _W (
• ' I' Q y ~vtia ~ !
~ ~ iy . • •vl D / ~ ~ ~i.~._.' ' 'O.i' N~ a O♦ •vt. "'Ti) e~..... •
10 O
nfL.1 J
-r ' ' A
` ~ " t+ ~r+o s / \
0 t ~ ~
! ' ~ i . ' $ f
' 2. ' :r~~fF?l~KZ:; ~F ` ' • F, j /
? ~ ~ ~:Jwibr c.r.o ~ ~ ~
►41y►,; r S .
SO. iI DR .1v I
2. M! LE
i I
~,0- w•., ~ .r. . ~k'SL. ~
"fiL.~ . e• w " '
. ~ • J f
•yux ` - " - i • ° =~ti
IS t< rr re '1! •o Oi o. OSi. •11p • , ' _
4M'n. ^ j i .
"
Qt ..•ii:J' ~ s t
_ • ~ _ _ '_t ~ _1+~~,~ f { cv O •4 t
.►i.v[ AvC- - ~.~No-ziz.~ tv
n r "
!L 19e1
31
~
t•sa~ ~
swu
. ! .Sroc~e►i~. I , ._.i
. ~ • ~ TM AJl. Clt
_
~ 7
. \ ~ ' •
714 ' - • !
NOo
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, 1rJ.ASHINGTON o
7t- 148-7? )
)
tli ~ ~ ~~rR or ~~~wGiNG 7mmc ~
MAP FROM A~`,~'►MCU~',~,`UP-AL SU3~~RBAN M ~ R E S 0 L U T I 0 N
SINGLX ~`.~~.~ILY RMICEI~TPL~~ PROprRTY ~
~~~TEL IN SECTION 18, XV~ ~S141~ 26 N., )
RANGE 44 , L, X .lv,'* , ITUA ~~~N, TY, V
)
The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the
Board that the Spokane County Planning Comcnission has given due notice of the hearing
on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning
Commission has held a public hearing as required; and that the said Planning Commission
concurB in the plan to zone the following described property as:
SING~~ ~AWIVY ~~~~NTIAL: ~~t isrc~ plattod r~~ Dom Caurt tcmted in SoCttors 18, Tawaship 25 N,►, Rar+ge 44,
E.'V Fpokane Caunty , 'kl, asi~tngton
NOW, THE'REFORE, BE IT RESQLVED, that the above-described property be, and the same
hereby is zoned under the classification of RE,~ICENTZAL
as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as
amendedo
PASSED BY THE BQARD THIS DAY OF , 19
~
y
ATTEST: BOARD OF CO r SSIONERS
OF SPOKAIVE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
VERNON ti~f e OHLAND
Clerk of Board
By:
~yHARRY M. IARNED, CNM.
~f W. CNRISTENSEN
This is to certify that this is a JERRY C. KOPET
true and correct ilw of~A~2~
Re soluti on No e
passed by Board this - • • ' '
day o f
By•
. ~
eputy
I hereby certify that I have posted
the above changes and revisions on
the Zoning Map in the Building Codes
Department, and do further certify
that the zone classification change
is the same as described above and
shown on the attached mapo
SIGNED: ?,e~
DATED :
20NE CHANGES POSTED ON Zi LrNG MAPS
~
Application No. _ZF-Z6If- -27 Res. No.~~- 7c/ 7 Res. Date
From: d4 . To:
~ .
, • •
0 -
Posted By: Date Posted: ~-/S- 7e _AA Acres: Sec. 14f Two. ZS Range 4~~6
EAST
(Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Wa11 Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
~
(Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400'
(File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000'
/
/l/loq (File Map) Metro #11 (Director's Office) Scale: 1" - 2000'
N1,4 (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile
,
/I/1,4 (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles
(Score Card) Middle Office
SOUTH EAST
(Wa11 Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Wall Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 400'
(File Map) Tracing #34 (South East Zoning Maps) Scale: I" - 1000"
(File Map) Metro #11 (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2 000'
(File Map) County-Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile
(File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles
(Score Cards) Middle Office
1
~
NO e 78 42.7
BEFORE THF AOARD OF COUTd'TY COMMI~SIONERS OF SPO'I.ANE C0UNTY, `-rIASHINGTON o
.
)
IN Tj1L ~'~TT~,A 0o" 7I:jIE,1G ME FI1VA.~j PiAT ) R E S 0 L U T I 0 N
0u~ :)t~;de CC3'Ui~2 ° ~CiAI`LD liv iEv'2I014 13', )
dc ~laCn 44.9
e:,. a .i'a • ~ ~
~~l"~..~L~.~ V~LJg~b.LJ~ :151aa~rl.~.d~~!'1VaQ • j
~
/
~
BE IT RESOLVED BY `~HE BOARD OF COUNTY COMI~iISSIONERS OF ;POKANE ~~UNTY, `~fASHINGTON ,
that tlze fina1 plat of
~7;0.-'Z3 cou'X2
k:I'At ox' t-a!n 1R1 V~ of S:ctio~n 13, To~~t~ :1) 25 No a RnG~e 449 ~mCJe~•Zo 5-)nkane
~ounfi;y9
more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommer_dation of the Spokane
County Planning Commission, be, and the samc hereby iU approved, L•11th the exception
that the nublic rights of tiray dedicated in tnis plat will not be established for
maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have
been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution oi the Board
of County Comrnissionerso
PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS 40; DAY OF 9 1~
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKAIVE COUNTY, WASHIfl1GT0Ii o
HARRY M. LARNED, CHM.
.
JERRY C. KOPET
ATTEST :
VERNON W. - ND
Clerk he Boar
By:
Deputy
.
S, ~ °IC R!:r. 'i 7
THRESHOLD DETERMTN1:+TI0 T:
. j~~ i
• ~is I DECLAR.ATION OF
:i
(Prapo ed/final)
• (signif icance/nonsfgnificance)
AQPAC7)C►MATFL`~ L.,J-
~eee"-s:: LAMD L~7S? 4~---WY S U
'3S pL h~Gl K-kn-, tiS A~ -
~ ~ CC)~
2. Proponent: --Q(f;;;5
3. Con:act Person: ~ I-(.fe v r-- Phone: 9 ZQ-
4. County Action(s) Requeste3: TLArT AAJD
Z.QNF-
5. LocaticDn of Proposal: Q~ C2!;~~p k~.
6. Lead Aaency: S~KANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
This proposal has been determined to _Ajo~ have a significant adverae impact on
the environment. An EIS is --t.~ required under RCW 43 .21C .030(2) (c) . This
~.?ecfsion was made after review by the County of a completed environmen[al checl;list
nnci oth=•r informatiun on file with the lead agency.
7. Rcsponsible Official:
Proposed Daclaration: Final Declaration:
(name ) L-► (name)
acur ~ si natutie)
(citle) D1 Qt5C LOP (title) C~~ RI
d t ! (dept,) CO- CO1V111/I
d a 7 2~l (d a t e) /g, 1/ 1~ .
D?eartmnnt Reference No.:
(See Reverse Side)
For Declarations of Significance Only:
Date of Expected D:aft QS Availability
(determined by Responsible Official)
Uate Entered in "IIS in Preparation Registci"
(determined by SjTA Public Information Center)
To be completed by responsible official:
3. Brief description and listing of those en•,ironmental impacts leadiiiy to such
declaration:
b. Brief explanatlon of what measures, if any could be taken by tt,e applicant to pre-
vent or mltiqate the environmental impac-t of the proposal to such an extent that
the responsible offtcial could consider a revised proposal with a possible ce-
sulting declaration of nonsigntflcance:
9. For Proposed Declaratiors of honsignificance Only:
Date Entered "ProposEu L =:i.,.~_._:_: ,
Register" (determined by SEPA Public Informa[ion G:
Date comments to be received (15 day review ;>«r'=
(r.,Pt~t'1TITlt?C :j' `~FP:~ Public IY:~t~t"1"i,3[ic!,~ la
10. SEPA Public Information Cente::
(For departments of General Goverr,rnt~r.L oni;)
( ) Agproved as to fom
( ) Disapproved as to forrr.
Rna sons. .~,tc, . . i,.'..
~
r "
. UiCyf'sam unn~ Y Transr~mer~ca
` 1'i11n liis1jr,111cn ('nniii:+..
lillo liv;iil;irtc;L) ;;c:rvi0' No►Iti 720 n►gor7ne Ro.. . .
SpokZne, 4Vas1►ington 99206
(509) 922-2222 `
!i
E-C-E-1 V E
AMENDED DEC 2 81977
CERTIFICATE TO PLAT
SPOKANE COUNTY
~~ANNING DEPARTMENT
Order No. $46 -M
C;ezL-ificate for Filing Proposed
Plat of DORN FIRST ADDITZON
SPolcane County Planning Commission
N. 811 Jefferson
Spokalze, WashingLon .
Gentl.emen : •
In the mattcr o:C the plat submiLted for yo«r approval, this Company
has examinecl the r_eeorcls of the County Auditor and County Clerlc of
Spokane County, 14asliington, and the records of the Clerk of the linited
States Courts holding tex-ms in said County, and from such cxamination
izereby c:erti.Eies that the title to Lhe followin£; described ].and si.tuate
in Spvlzane County, to-iqit :
TtzaL part:i_on of_ the Nortnwest quarter of Section 1_8, Towmship 25 North,
R<.nge 44 E. W. M. , cicscribed as foll_ows :
Tlze Nort'h half of the SouLh half of_ the NortheasL quarter of the South-~
~i-is t: quarter of the Noz: Lhwes r quarter of 5cct:ion 18, Tnumship 25 1~lorth,
RanfTe 44 E. Cq. i4. ,].yinp, lqest of the Southerly prolongation of the
West li.ne of Lot 8 in Block 1 of nORNS ADpITZON, as per plat ther.co-f
recorded in Volume 3 0f Plats, page 50; ,
SituaLe ill the County of Spolcane, State of jaashington.
VE S TED IN:
WESLE'Y C. 'Cn"j 'ODY Glid :;US7aN K.'.CR0SBY, iru5band and wife
EXCEPZ'IONS :
l, Reservation contained in Deed from Spokane Val1ey IrrigatiQn
District No. 10, dated March 5, 1943, recorded in Rook 526 of
Deeds, page 353, as follows:
1'he clisCxiet reserves a11 existinf; righLs of way Lind easement5
ovor and acx-oss said promises,a71d also the riy;ht at any ancl
all times to go upon sai.d premises or any part ther_eaf, ,far the
purpasC af consLi tic c:i.ilf;, oper_ ati►ig a11ci mninLaining cana].s, di Lch`s ,
flumes or pipe ]_ines, which shall, by t:lze Roard of. nirecCors
Uf~ said district, be deerned necessary in the operation of its
irrigation systern.
(continued)
~ - -s
SECOND AMENDED CERTZFTCA7'E
TO THE PLAT
8rger2No. 84633-M
Records examined to December 19, 1977at 8:00 A. M.
TRANSAMERI(;A TITL1: ZNSURANCE COIVANY
By:
,
Dennis Roberts
rl,iLle Officer
cc: Mike Senske
kk
.
~
.
Transamerir Transamerica
7itlcr Insuranc;U Sc:r vicc;;, Titlo Insurnncc► Comr
, North 720 nrgonno Ro__ ~
Spokano, Washington 99206
. ~ " (509) 922-2222
AMENDED
CERTIFICATE TO PLAT
Order No. 84633-M
Certificate for Filing Proposed
Plat of DORN FIRST ADDITION
Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington
Gentlemen:
In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company
has examined the rECOrds of the County Auditor and County Clerk of
Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United
States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination
. hereby certifies that Ghe title to the following described land situate
in Spokane County, to-wit:
That portiorl of the Northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 25 North,
Range 44 E. W. M., described as follows:
The North half of the South'half of the Northeast quarter of the Southzl''
east quarter of the Northwest quarter of Section 18, Township 25 North,
Range 44 E. W. M., lying West of the Southerly prolongation of the
West line of Lot 8 in Block 1 of DORNS AUDITION, as per plat thereof
recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 50;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN;
RITA L. DELEHANTY, as her separate property EXCEPTIONS:
l. 1% excise tax, it unpaid. R E C E I V E
(continued) OCT 2~ 1977
SPOKANE COUNTY
RTMENT
PLANNING DEPA
Order No. 84633-M
.
Cert. to Plat
October 14, 1977
2. Reservation contained in need from Spokane Valley Irrigation
District No. 10, dated March 5, 1943, recorded in Book 526 of
Deeds, page 353, as follows:
The district reserves all existing rights of way and easements
over and across said premises, and also the right at any and
all times to go upon said premises or any part thereof, for the
purpose of constructiiig, operating and maintaining canals, ditches,
flumes or pipe lines, which shall, by the Board of Directors
of said district, be deemed necessary in the operation of its
irrigation system.
3. DEED OF TRUST AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantor: John E. Delehanty and Rita L. Delehanty,
husband and wife
Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company
Beneficiary: American Commercial Bank
Amount: $35,000.00
Dated: March 10, 1976
Recorded: March 1$, 1976
Recording No.: 7603180204
Records examined to October 14, 1977 at 8:00 A. M.
0--w.
. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
By :
'V~Dennis -R'oberts
Title nfficer
cc: Mike Senske
kk
1
, '25 ' ~ - _
~
I t' v e, V ~
1 1'
~ .
~ K-) TD -D V -r- t cD
J . N
~ _ l 3
,
~
0
Bv ~
.
. . ` •
"5
A 7- -5
~ ~ - c\~ ~
~
~ Q11
L ~
Z 2
8s 8 S
_ . a~ e.s ,
NQ L~~~
~i
• ~ -
T(;AN~5AMERICA ~11Tl.E INSURANCE COMPANY ? o , o~~ I
W 808 SPRAGUE AVENUE
'SPOKANE, WASH(NGTON 99201
.
N
~ y
~
; E
r 3 C^J
This print is ma0e so:r.!v 'nr Ihr purpose of assistirit
in locatint said crernises lril,, 1l'P ('Qfip?Ily aRrvm!': nA i !,`r~ J ~ ~ _ . ~ y,•.
I:ability for va►iotinns, il ar+y. in dimr.nsiorly nn/
,n^atron ascertaintd by aclu7l smv-1
,
i
~~ANDARD CONDzTIO~TS
FOR
APPROVAL OF PREr~~~NA~~ FLATs
1, 1977
PIANNING DEPARTMEN-T
SPOKAN~ ~OI1N'1'Y PIANNING CC)MMl'~~ION
S'?'AP;QARL', -I!"Uz llt . . =.i"'RUVAL Ui PREI1h:iNAFt`: i-1A1`>
~I'~_~~:A;.£ _ ?.~`:TY ~'!~',1•:":?'.._ DE,'Ap7'N!£'tiT An'I: C11) L°N! 'I1' FLA NrZN~
l. -".1 T I._. _ _ , . . r _ . . • . . ' _ i'_ : i: • '
~~r•Gi:,. _ ri .
1, f'Ic1Ct'. - !='?ieCt ::lc1t il:t iTll/(C t(if31-. i~1tE.' .~WC' l -
ing structurc be picced on an;t ar:e iot, nrir yiialJ ari,r int he further subdivided f~)r tl-:..
pLrposes of creatinq addittanal lcts or Uwlding sites withQUt filir.a .
(P-'.1 T!:-.'[ the oIa*_ l.:._>v;c~i~t_~~ . ~-t ~ .::itr , . . :i_ :t _ :~3'-,. ..;c ~:czl::~.r.:~r•:
(T'- :7) J ii;.tl the continuatiar af the streets be dedicased or deedea: A 1' strip at the encis :
t-.:iyes af all sireets that terminate or border the plat baur.ciar:r. f,T~-rp•,r~~r c:.:'. ~e
rr=: required when streets cerminate at the pta:
~-5) Tliac appropriate street names be ir'►dicater_i.
"inat appropriate uttlitY easements be zndicated on copies o' the appraved prelimtnary
:at fac Qistribution to the Plan^tng Departmer:i and the utility oompanies. Writ#en ap-
rrc,val Qf the easements by the utiiicv company must be recelved prlor Lo the sul7mittal
r . ~.r:~.~.~:.,... . _ . ,:proveti by the w•8tec sup-
pl,ier and fire proteccj;)n dist,ict. Sa_:a wa_er pIa:: ,T~USt als:: :YSve been appraved by the
approprlate health autharfties .'The hcalth autharities, water suppller (purveyor), and
fire protectian dtstrlcz will r.ertify, prior t:) the filing of the i1nal plat, on the face of
s3td waier plan that the plan is in conformur.ce with their requirements and will ade-
auately satisfy their rpspective need Said water pIan and certif!cation wili he draft-
~c~ ~ c,.,Ce•; . -u!~~t.!~. f_. i._ . --i_ . .
Tflt'i 1 . !Ei_ ...C_.
•hat appropriate contractual arranaements havc> beeri made wit:z tiie plat spoiisor icr con-
-;truction of the water system, in accorCancc with the approveu p!an, and tr. accordance
tvith a tlme schedule. 'ftie time schedule will pcovide, in ar.y case, for camgletian af
the Lvater system ar:d inspection by the apprvririate 1zealth authoriti-es prior tn applica-
eion far building permits withtn the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a
uravision holding Spokane Gounty anc the purveyoc harcr,less frorn elalms by any 13t
plrchaser refused a bullcltnc pernit dve to the tailure of the plat sponsor to satisiactor-
,LV'
?''~e Ulat dedica:l~:i .._]1 effec: 1:):C, PuLl:c :%atel- ^vste~
:i< approved by County and State Healt.n authont:cs anr.3 the lecal i:re districc 3nd pur-
•:r,yor will be installed within this plat, anc the subdiv2der wsll provide For lndividual
• i*)mestic water service as we!l as ftre protection to each lot prior to sale of each lat.
'I'"at a certificate of title ae furnished the eI•-inninq I}epartmertt prief to the ffliliq of
•:ie final pfat.
T;.dI the tF-1F-? That Lhe stat}:s _),r the parcrl -'s:e
'.,e indicated on the ftnal plat and in the deCi1Ca[1vn, anct thai the staft Le allotiveG Noek wi:n 'he spcansnr deterrtine tts best ise ar^
(C.?r:tin':~
7'AvUA.RD CONDITIc7NS FGR API'ROVAi UF 'r'kEL.ih41?`dARY t'iATS
G01_';.?'T`: PI.Vm;N!(-: gpt`)';~ JF COt_ltiii'1' rcc•
F, .
. , ' . . . ' ' .
_ - ~ _ . . . - . . -
retentton, cevet;;pmera, and mudnter:at,c;e of all conlmori open suace Iand px,
the fflirq of tne flnal plat; which documents shall provide, amor,g cther thln
fur a min[mum $ssessment of inembers ai a honre Dwners` assactattan fDr su:.
apen space develapment and rnaintenance, said
the p2anning Director prior ta ftliny of the finaJ pi.:-
W The areas shown as recreatton area and/or site,
ftned and given lot and block rtumbers, The finai pIa* will shnw *he fvt>>rP stllo sWtus of parceJs to be svid, parcets to rAmain i . , , .
c) "f
at the sponsor's expense and shall (nctude prooer guaran#ee of minimvm sta:
d(~lc r ir';~}r•^t:cir^F•f'F ~{n! 4=!.~r.,~'l~~. .tl,.f~, ~,_fnr~i;.'~: ~ i;r,.--;,~-~
p1atLing on tne preittltinacy nlat of recorci, tnen the i!,
(f'-12)
the beneitt of Falrchild Air Eorce Base ar.d Spoka!:e tnternational Airp
' at a declaration of Non-Sfgnificance be issued, iii accordance with Section I1.15.
:0 of the Spokane Cauniy Environmenta! Ordinance (SGEQ) prior to approval of this
commendation by the tioard of County Cummissianers, or that any appraving actlc•::
the Board be conditioned upon issuance of Final Declarauon 3i Non-Sfgnlflcance
--'~nce with SCEO 11, 15.340.
, ,fr;..,-,~ r r.- . , : ~r- ~r~tal chec~:Itst for the nro~.x>sal ar:-~ a
.rr;t: .
- ~t ,-.:~'..:i-, • - i_ , , , . : , • .
' . . . _ ~ . . , r! - . . _ _ . . .
_ _ - : , . ` ' _ . . . .
gra(iLs be submitted
che filing of a final pl _
i:r;- t) 'lnat dcainaqe plans a:, : , - . ~ . :i.. . . . . . • . .
ane far.ilrt les be 5ukvr.~t. - -i: - . _ . ~ •
Ute dlreCt superviston o# a 1lcensed iand surveyar, wha shall be respans:ble :rar parge,-
uating all evtdence of the locatlon oil survey monuments which may be distrubed durir.ci
construction and who shall furnish the Caunty Engineer with "As Suilt" plans and a:_- -
ficate ln writing that all lmprovements vrere SnstaUed to the lines and grades shown
the appraved constructton plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replacif
(F- ~l No construct(on work is tn s,n performeri :v!th tti-:~ Put,t+.;- RioF+ nf Wav -,inn! ~plerr-n?t
been Issued by thc _ , . . .
the C,otmty Engineo:
. ~';E - . . T.'i:1.1`.'i. i _ T
All cQnstructian witnisl the Pu.bl:c kiyitt :;)t . . • . , . - , • . . ,
plat or a nond Ln the amount estimated btf L~Ju;:;y Ei:gis•,ee,• *,u civer t,,e C:ra: UL CLI:
struction af tmprovements, cnnsiruction certification, "As e-'?±" r.!,n,;, in;4
t::e s*.reet r.enterllnes, shall be filed with the County Enginer. .
(E- 7) No dlrect acces,~ fnm lats to 1/2 rfghi of u:ays tmttl such t- _.,...__._..,1 .
. t _ . . . ~ . . ~ .
un:y Standards and esiablist-ieci as County Roa.
,ad design, rough grading construction, and dra:_y,_:
.d Stub Road connections ar+e the responsibility of the develop€.
'+at the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer
>ptabla ta the State Highway Depar-iment af the praposeci State Highway-County Roa,-:
~:*ersectian. State Higbway Department approval of the proposed design must be re-
,ived prior ta the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Filghway are to be
responsibility of the sponspr and may either be constructed or a bond ta cover the
,st :>f such irrzprovements fumished to the Caunty Engineer .n the amount as determined
the Gounty Eng ineer and the State Iiighway Department.
`'-.at a narne be indlcated tyefore the Eir.al D?.st i; fl?Fd; ~t:ch name to be apprrve8 bv
I1 _...,f ~ _ _ . - ! - - - , . .
21 Th:~ dedtcatory langusge of the plat wtlJ SCnfn rFle sponsnr wtll c-issu:ne- no rnsponsib>1-
for provlslon of domestic wat=, r.
Ti,~t condttlonal approval be gtve:i s:~i:}~ct ;~:►,rt?•lsia,,:; in Cl:u p13t fcjr a pubi:c st-.•:~-:
system. Approval of the deslgn of satd systems must be given by County and Stact
~iealth authoritles and the County Uttllttea Department pctor to flling of the final ptat .
~r t~~~_
sultable guarantee wtll be requlred to cover the cos1 s?fc s,.°st~-?
_3mount as detecmined by the Publlc Works Department.
"hat a statemenk be placed !n the dedlcatton to the effect thut a puLlic eewer syste..
will be made LvCSilaF11;? for the plat r~r.~ !~ri!vlduaI serAr.e %%•ill he provided to Aac';
prlor to sale .
Prlor ta filir,.. _ _ *h_ .l:.~_! I,~r•, . ...:-,.i ~ _~,s± -
.ri_ . : . .i . ~ . • :r _ ii.,.=} .
, „
SPOKANE COUNTY
o'r ~ ' ~ I ~ ~ E• L' rp, d
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~v
N. 811 JEFFeRSO►v ~ Ss,~•5'~7
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 ~ ~ ~ _
`~J~~ . ~ c~ y ~ c~-7 ' o • . ~`6 O . -d a
- ,
~ 1 G
~ N F Ab~ .
C~ O- oCalvin T. Kary
~ N .W . Counseling Serviee
Cheney, WA. 99004
. ~~~r~-_ .
r ~ ~.e~•f
JKANE COUNTY PLANNING COn ISSION
North 811 jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
September 26, 1977
,
Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House
Spokane, WA 99201
Gentlemen:
At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday,
September 23, 1977 at 9:00 A.M. to I2:10 P.M. reconvening at 1:35 P.M. to 4:50 P.M.
in Conference Room "A", County Court House Annex. The enclosed action was taken
and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners,
. Members Present: • Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, Messrs o
Mafn, Quigley and Thomas. Planning Staff present: Bethards, Horobiowski and
. justice. Engineer's Office:Kennaly, Health District: Praethero Prosecutor's
Office: Emacfo.
Mr. Main abstained from any discussion or voting on items PE-1133-77 and
PE-1134-77 due to a conflict of interest.
S incerely,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Ted McCoury, C ha irman '
Fred L. Dayhar , Director
FLD: kj
Official minutes and record of action
taken by Spokane County Planning
Comm is s ion at their regular hearing
held on September 16, 1977.
N.INUTES OF THE PLANNING COMNISSION HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 23, 1977,
VJHEREAS, the Spokane County Ptanning Commisston dfd hold a public hearfng
on September 23, 1977 to consider the testimony and requests of several appllcants,
objectors, and other lnterested parttes concernfng the below referenced subdivislons,
zone ciassiflcation upgradings, extenstons of time, reconsiderations of conditions,
and other Items of bustness, and
WHERE,AS, at said hearing opportunfty was afforded those favoring and those
opposing all Items of business, and
V!rHEREAS, Tvir. NAcCoury, Mrs. 8yrne, Mrs. Rawlings, and the Messrs. Main,
Qulgley and Thomas were in attendance and constituted a qu~orum, and
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission fully constdered the
testimony gtven, the environmental review, and all other evldence presented,
recommends to the Board of County Commtssioners the followinq:
1. PE-1106-77 - SALTESE HILLS; BATES and ZE- 84-77: tTNCLASSIFIED TO
AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN : That the appllcakion be conttnued to the October
1977 Planning Commissfon hearing. The applicant is fnstructed to pay all
advertising costs at the time the item ts ptaced back on the agenda.
(Mrs. Rawlings moved, Nar. Quigley seconded motion. Vote was unantmous.)
2. PE-1112-77-- IVIGNTE-VISTp ESTATES FIRST ADLITIQN: KAHUNA LAND CO.
and ZE- 97-77 - UNCLASSIFIED TQ AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the appll-
, catlon be continued to the November, 1977 Planning Commission hearing. The
~ appllcant Is inst ructed to pay all advertlsing costs at the tfine the ltem Is
piaced back on the agenda.(NIr. Thomas moved, IVirs. Rawltnqs seconded
the motion. Vote was unanlmous.)
3. PN-1133-77 - VtrEATHERVANE TERRACE FIRST ADDITION: GOCKLEY and
7N- 144-77 - AGRICULTURAL TQ AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the
appilcation be returned to the sponsor so that the sponsor might further constder
the posslbtltties of a public water sysfiem to serve the subdlvfsfon. (Mr.
Thomas moved and Nirs. Rawlings seconded the motion. Vote was 4 to 1.)
4. PE-1134-77 - SINGING HILLS: WOODARDS and ZE-145-77: UNCLASSIFIED
TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN:. That the-preliminary subdivision to be known
Singng Httls (file number PE-1134-77) be approved subject to the conditfons
as contatned !n the Planning Staff's findings, dated September 23, 1977, and
that a zone classi fication upgrade be approved to the Agricultural Suburban
zone Classffication (File number ZE-145-77) upon the flling of the final plat,
and that a proposed declaration of Non-Signiflcance be lssued, (Motlon by
Mr. Quigley, seconded by Nir. Thomas. Vote was 4 to 1.)
5. PE-1135-77 - LIBERTY IAKE HEIGHTS FIRST ADDITIOIlT: SCHNEIDMILLER
and ZE-146-77 AGRICULTURAL TG SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That
the pretiminary subdivision to be known as Llberty Lake Helghts First Addition
be approved subject to the condittons as contained !n the Planning Staff`s .
findings, dated September 23, 1977, that a zone classlflcatlon upgrade to the
- 1 -
•
Singie Famiiy Res[dentia.i Zone Classiflcation be approved upon the filing of
the ftnai plat, and that a proposed declaration ot non-stgntficance be issued.
(IVirs. Byrne moved, Mr. Quigley seconded the motlon. Vote was unanimous.)
6. PE- 1136- 77 - PELLEY .ADZiITION TO GREENACRES: HODGES, INC, and
ZE- 147-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN"'IAL and/or TWO-
FANILY RESIDETJTIAL: That the proposal be denied and retu -ned to the applicant
because of denstty, too many dup.lexes, and tncompatibtlft3• with.the area.
(PVIrs. Rawltngs moved, Nsrs. Byrne seconded the •rnrotton. Vote was 4 to 1.)
7. PE-1137-77 - DORNC4URT: CROSBY and ZE-248-77 - AGRICULTURAL SUBUR
BAN TO SINGLE FAIviILY RESILENTLAL: That the preltminary subdtv[slon ta be
known a s Dorn Court be approved subj ect to the conditions as contalned In the
Planning Staff's ]Findings, dated September 23, 1977, and that a proposed
declaratton of non-signiftcance be tssued and that the foltowing conc:ition'
b,,~ Imposed: That the speclfied road improvements of I?orn Court north to Boone
Avenue,`: by the County Engineer's Office be met. (Nrs. Rawlings moved,
Ntrs. Byrne seconded the motlon. Vote was unanimous.)
8. PE-1I38-77 - PARKV1i:ATER INDUSTRIAL PARK ADDITION: BURLINGTON NORTH-
ERN, INC.: That the preifminary subdivlston to be known as Parkwater Indus-
trial Park be approved, subject to the conditions as contained in the Planning
Staff's fEndings dated September 23, 1977 and that a proposed declaration of
non-stgnificance be issued. (The motton was made by Ivlr. Thomas and seconded
by Mrs. Rawltngs, Vote was unanimous.)
9. PN-9I2B-73 - GLENEDEN FOURTH ADDITION: NELSON and ZN-88B-73 -
AGRICULTURAL TC SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the sponsor be ailowed
to increase the number of lots in Gleneden Fourth A,ddition to 146, all for
single famtiy dwell.tngs. The appticant is further instructed to contact the IVIead
School District and attempt to solve the need for a school site in the area, and
that a proposed declaration of non-signfficance be Issued. (Mrs. Rawitngs
moved and Nir. Quig.ley seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous.)
~
10. PVlJ'-1098-77 - PINE R4CK RANCHETTES: ROBBINS and ZV'V-77-77 - AGRICUL-
TURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAPJ: That the appllcant's request for a relaxa-
tton En fire flow requirement as contained in the original condltlons of approval
be approved, subject to approva.l of the flnal design by the appropriate agencies,
and that a proposed declaratfon of non-significance be lssued. (IViokton made
by Nir. Niatn and seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was 5 to 1.)
11. PN-1100-77 - GLENCREST ADI?ITIONo NELSON and ZN-79-77 - AGRICUL=
TURAL TO SINGLE FAlI4ILY RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN:
That the sponsor's request to increase the number of tots t0 51 be approved,
and that a proposed declaratlon of non-significance be issuedo (Motion made
by Nr. Thomas seconded by 1Vir. iMain. Vote was unantmous.)
12. PE-1031-76 - RIEGEL HEIGHTS ADDITIUIV: RIEGEL and ZE-90-76 - AGRICUL-
TURAL SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIfiL: That an extension of time
be granted to October 1, 1978 .(Nrs a Raw.lings moved and 1Virs. Byrne seconded
the motion. Vote was unanimous.)
- 2
t
13. That a date be set in October, 1977 to constder the "Land Capabtltty Report"
for the Spokane County Comprehens ive Plan Update e
14. That the heartng on the proposed short plat ordtnance for Spokane County be
continued to November 9, 1977 at 7:30 P.M. tn Conference Room "A" of the
Court House Annexo
15. That the Staff contact all County School Dtstricts regardtng the possibllitles of
a joint meettng with the P.lanning Commission to dtscuss mutual concerns.
16. That the Planntng Staff review the present parking requlrements of.the Zoning
Ordinance and present any recommendations to the Planntng Commission at
the Dec-ember, 1977 Planning Commission Hearing.
Ivr. Nain excused hlmself from voting on ttems 1, 2, 3 and 4 due to a possible
conflict of tnterest.
P lanning Staff Present; Bethards, Deysenroth, Horoblowski and justice.
Engineer's Offlce: Kennaly. Health Dtstrict: Prather.' . Prosecutor's Office: Emacio.
DATED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1977.
BY: KATHLEEN JUSTICE
Planning Commission Secretary
FOR: Ted McCoury
Planntng Commtssion Chafrman
Fred L. Dayharsh
Director of Planning
-3-
G-co
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBItC WORKS BUILDINti N. a11 JEFF£RSON STREET
..Y' ~ ~ ' k ~ w 7•
PHONE 468-2270
- y •~7 •i ' i ? . a.
SPOKANE, WASHlNGTON 89201
. , NIEMORANDUM
T o:O -5 Qo. Cv. + P►sT (9) Sib. VAt,FY ~ii~p_ oisY Q,r~l
A-1`TN 4 ~~.I--:T + /~4'~TTrU : Q L Cc.`~-G-C XN; WATEk RUWG`(o2.
(1) DS ~+s
-XIAt ~us7~ c~
F R O M: Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 jefferson
Spokane, WA 99201 509-456-2274
Attention: % 6
R E F E R E N C E: Lead Ajency Designation, Proposed Declaration of Non-
significance, Environmental Checklist, etc.
Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Plannfng Department, a
divisfon of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING
AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following proj ect:
M- I 1-57"?7
The following is explanation for this determination:
WAG I q-7- io -Z10
Informatlon on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be
an AGEIVCY OF JURISDICTION, WAC 197-10-040 (4).
Acconiinqly, if you wlsh to exercise your option to review and comment as pro-
vided in WAC i 97-10-340 (5), please be advised that the proposal was li sted
in the SEPA Public Information Center on:
f 12-71-7 7
,
'i .
i •
,r'r v ~
FI~V D1 NL7S
PRELIMINA~~ SUBDIVISION AND ZOI1TE CLASSIFICATION UPGRAnIhIG
PE-1137-77 - DORN COURT: CROSBY
ZE- I48-77 , AGRICULTU'Ft~~ SUBURSAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTI.AL
Staff findings regarding FE-1137-77, Dorn Cvurt.
I: GENERAL INF~RMiA3`IOIV:
A e Loca tio n
Dorn CourC ~s located in the west central area af the Spokane Valleyr
south of Boone Avenue and west of VLsta Road.
B. Praposal
The applicant proposes to subdivtde approxiranately 1.2 acres intv four (9).
1ots1 a11 for si,ngle fannLly dwellings. The propos~l wauld create a gross
de ns ity of about 3.4 uniks per acre with a typical lot size of about
9 ,754 square feet.
C. Relatlonship to the Comprehensive Pian
The proposed subdivtsian is .located withln an area that has beeri desig-
nated as suitable for resideritEal cleuelopment by the appraved map of the
Park and Recreatian Elerraent of the 5pokane County Cornprehensive P~an.
D. Existing Land Uses
'Fhe site in questiort is presently vaearit with no sign[ficant topographfc
features The prapertles that surround the plat have deuexoped In a
marrner similar tv the intended s&dfvislon and this proposal nlight be
considered a "fiil-in'° plat, .
ii. SPE C FAL'INFORMATION:
A. Circulatian
The Spvkane County Engineer's Office has reviewed khe proposal and
they find that adequate existing roads are avaLlable to serve the gropasai
and that the design af the proposed subdivisivn is acceptable to their
affLce.
B. Sevvage Disposal
"The praposal been approved by the Cvunty hea.Eth District for t he use
, vf LndivfduaL on-slte sewage dlsposal systems. The District finds th~~
the proposai is, however, situated over the Sgokane Valley Aqui#er. The
- 7 -
PE-1137-77 - DORN COURT (Conttnueri)
. Distrlct belleves that approval of thls proposal wlli have a negligible
impact upon the groundwater quality, but continued urbanizatlon at thls
density mtght have at least a moderate impact upon the groundwater
qualtty at some future date.
C. Water Supply
The Washtngton Water Power Company has stated t hat ft has the abiltty
to serve the slte with both domesttc and fire fiows.
D. Fire Protection
Both matns and hydranLs need to be tnstalled to provide for adequate fire
protection needs.
E. Parks
No Improved county parks are located within the immediate area and the
County Parks Department has no present plan for site acquisttton In
the area. Limtted recreatlonai facilitles are avallable to the west of the
stte at Park juntor High School and at the Park Road Swimming Pool,
a county facility.
F. Schools
No comment has been recetved from the West Valley School Dlstrtct
regarding this proposal. However, prevlous correspondence wlth the
Distrlct leads the Staff to belteve that no slqniflcant tmpact would result
on the dtstrict's facilittes.
III. ENVIRQNMENTAL REVIEW:
The Staff has revtewed the envtronmental checklist submitted by the applicant
and the staff recommends that a declaration of non-signlflcance be issued.
IV. C 4N DITI ONS :
Specific condittons applicable to this plat are referenced below and found tn
the attached supplement entttled, "Standard Condttions for Approval of Pretlm-
inary Plats - August, 1977.
NOTE: Any amendments to sald condltions are stated separately and listed
below.
P-1, P- 2, P- 3, P- 4, P- 5, P- 6, P- 7, P- 8, P- 9(October 1, 1978), P-13,
E-10, E-2, E- 3, E-4, E- 5, E- 6, A-1, H-1, H-5
- 7A -
DEP'I`. FiLE ~Er.
,~•E'U ~I-
~
wT i~• a
tr+°`*='~•
~ . , e~- -
STAFF REV~EW OF ENVI1~~~~ENTAL CHECKLIST
T. Tn accordance with the ~~~kane County Environmental Ordinance anci WAC 197-10f
an Environmental C;~~~klist has been submitted by the applicant or h#.s agent.
This c~eckli t, and an ad 'tionaI rtinerlt dat has ubsequently been reviewed
by khe . „ .
The following data brf~~ly describes the pro~c~sal•
- ;
~ a
A. Action Requested:
y '
B. Description of r0pos~1:
~ fi
- - ~
C. LoCatrn of Proppsal:
~ - ~
H. Rcvi~w of ChecklisG:
A. Slight adverse imDacts are noted under the followir,g Questians:
- -
(Over)
i
I
i
B. Potentialiy significant adverse impacts are noted under the following
questions :
C. Dtscussion of impacts identified anove:
III. Conclusions and Recomm►endations:
Based on II A, B and C ab►ove, t h~ sta f f
~ ~ ' •
f~ -
~
,
i ,~~►~.I~~~ ' ~ ~_~r~ ~'T'~
~ y~
.►uw~wt C'~ur'• ~-OU~* ~u~ft
ENVIRONMENTAI, CHECKLIST
Introduction: The State Ervironmental Policy Act of 1971, C1lapter 43.21C, RC W,
requires all state and local qovernmental agencies to consider environmental values
both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires
that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actlons signtficantly
(and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The
purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questians as completely as you can wi[h the information
presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yea" or "maybe" if, in your
opinion, even only sliqht impacts will result. The reviewers of the checkiist will be
aware of and concern themselves with the deqree of impact, askinq you for more informa-
tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you
believe an explanation would be helpful to qovernment decision-makers, include your
explanation in the space pravicled, or use additional paQes, if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are
relevant ta the answars you provide. Complete answers to these questfons now will
help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental
review without unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impac[s which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now,
without duplicating paperwork in the future.
No application shall be procesaed until the checklist has been completed and returned
to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanatlons for everv "ves"
and "maYbe" answer on the checklist, The person completing tha form may be required
to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information
to aid in a threshold determination.
NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and locail agencies in the State
of Washinqton for varlous types of proposals. Many of the questiona may not
apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, iust answer it "no" and
con tinue on to the next que s tion . V~
R E C EI
AU G 1977
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
SPOKANE COU~TMENT
i. BACKGROUND pLANNING DEPA
1. Name of Proponent: Wes Crosbv
' 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Nortrl 15,06 Pir:e~
Spokaile, WA ; 9216
922-2200
3. D,3te Checklist Submitted: 8/15/77
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Saokane Counry, Wa t '
5. Nama of Proposal, if Applicable:
_ 1 _ ' I ,
(IF SPACE F'OR LXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P[..EASE ATTACH ADllITIONAL PP%GES.)
b. N3ture and I3rief Description of ttze Fropcsal (including buC nat lir:,l Co its Size ,
general design elements, and othAr f3ct(D►'F tti1?t .`:!l1 c;1von 317 ICCLIr<?I.a UflCipt-
standing of its scope and nature) :
Development of 4 resicl.en:,iti:l ~i.cmu 2J 1J, '
requirements wi-uhin an existinr- neirhborhood settipE.
7. Location of Proposal (describe ti:e physical ;e:tinq of the propos~.l, as well as the
extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other
information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting
of the proposal) :
-Tne nroper_t.,,v is located at; the end of Dorn Court jus~
Snltth Q BoonQ n~~,-~r Vista_ Tt, is a va _an . non-r.rncll~a-t:ivg
8. Estimated Date for Comple[ion of the Proposal:
Marcr, 197$
9. I.ist of all Permits, Licenses or Gevernment Approvals Required for the Proposal
(federal, state and local - including rc:zones): '
~ ~t ~i;rov Co. Plannin~ Com.rr,/Brd of Co. Comin.
2'a7i~~ P.~T"' _t -3': COUnty H~,---.,.lth I)1st2'1Ct
annri nr,:,~ .ri1r-t-.i nr, PPrmi . - SLykanp f'.nl:nt.v En~-`; nnPr~
ui!dil:P- Pcr~i~ s S.,alane Count,y Buildin • Uodes
10a. yau,or'fhe ownerln the event you do not ovvn the subjec land, have any
plans for future addltions, expansion, or further activity related to or con-
nected wt th thls proposal ? If yes, explatn:
_SiS?
lOb, Do you own or have opttons on Iand nf-arby or adjacent to thls proposals
locat[on? If yes, explaln:
'J - ~ 1ot.r. ' n Dori-i 1,.T' `~i-1-1. ~ Tl1 ,J ,,,.I~.
„~:z~
_~eseni:134 ur.L'te.r ~nr►!:;truot-.;,nn"
11. Do you know of any plans by others lncluding the owner which may affect the
property covered by your proposal or land adSacent or nearby? If yes, expla[n:
T;o
12. At[ach any other application form t}iat }zas been conlpleted reganLing ttie probosal;
if none has been completed, bu[ is expected to be filed at some future date,
describe the nature of such application form:
_LT f,fiiP
II. ENVIRONML-'NTAL IMPAC'TS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "mayUe" answers are required)
Yes MaYbe Nc
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic
structures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
(b) Disruptions, displacemen[s, compaction or overcover3nq
of the soil ? , , . , . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . X_
_ ~ _ •
1 `
~
~
~
(IF SPACE FOR EXPL",NATION IS INADEQUATE, PL.EASE ATTACT-i A[7DZ'T10NAI.. P,'?GES.)
'tes Mnybe
(c) ChangA in tunography or grounci s;urf,3ce reliEf ip
(d) The destruction, covecinq or modification of any unique
geoloqic or physical features? . . . . . , , . , , , x
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosian of soils, either
on or off the site ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
~
(f) Chanqes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may
modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of ~
the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? -x
~ -
.~~xianation: Placement _o-t' ci3rh~/r n~/ z~-~ n~:~~_,e~„~ on t.l~Q rsro m_-~-tv
-A11 r~~c=l1irR s.c-r,_e cr rincii fi r.,~.,ryi hn -,.n thP -,1]1^Pr1C'F_ Parth
,
J TI Somi~i o :!'y f-i c: fl Z/ 2^ '1 11 g PP-'~zc~ .al1' v
. _ . r _as es..~.n~n1' ~,in~ ~ h~
Mc1y.be liO
2, Air. Will the proposal tesult in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?. x _
(b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . , x
(c) Alteratfon of eir movement, moiscure or temperactire,
or any change in climate, efther locally or reqionally? x
Exolar:,)tion: u -a'!,t_litional houses Yt7.1? incrEase ciLl'tOIfaobile_ tr2--fi 1C ,
1
~ l'• _ • _ } 1" _ . ' ~ ''I i.t i.~ [ ~/7 Tt"„F' ^y?" ~
'7 _ 1 u Cr
~ - ~ .r w~ ~.i.~..~~' •.i~ w. ~ ~1 1 I ~ r ~ ~ "1 . ~ Yf ~.i_ ~ . ' ,~1 1 : ~ _
11 e
C'.f'~ V J ...~..~sl.~ - ~ 1 ~~:.L~.l__ .~y..•_.:.~.x--,X-- . i :_~L.~:_;
-yE&et at-i
" 1'Y' ~~~1 r;rr
V 1 ~~a L 1. . J V • •
3, W3tc:. LrViIl the proposal result i:::
(a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters?
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and a mount of surface water runoff
(c) Alterations to the cuurse or flow of flood waters?
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
bcxJy ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
(e) D:scharge into surface waters, or in any alteraticn
of surface water quality, including but not limiteci
c.::) temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidiry? iL
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground
wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ :t - -
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either throuqh
ciirect additians or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? . . . . . . . .
(h) D,iterioration in ground water quality, either thrnugh
direcl iniection, or through the seepaqe of leachaCc,
pho;pates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteri-- ,
or other substances into the qround wa[ers? . . . . . . _ ,
(i) Reduction in the amount of water othenvlse availabls
for public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Explati3[ian: 7,Pacha tes frcm drain i'ields do enter thc g ounci.
~r, r, r~--, a n t. l u n n r- 1P-a r P_ V't fi n-1'1 C'_ P_ a~~ n -vf~~ r-thnr ar
tS: -rn in i.•iat _r_ tiS of w ;-r l 1
z ' ,
-3-
(IF SPACE FC?R EXpL.~'~NATIO~4 IS INADEQUATF, PLEASE AT"TACii D:)[TIONAL PF.GES,)
Yes X ~ -iybe Na
4. F lor-1, W i 11 the Y:-~ .pc,sal result in:
(.3) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of
J:ny species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, mfcroflora and aqua[ic plants)? , . . , , . . , ~
(b) Redu-tion of the numhers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora? . , . . , , , , . , , , X
(c) Inkroduction of new species of flora lnto an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of
- existing species? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(d) Reduction in acreage of any aqricultural crop ~
Exp1anation:
' S ti' ~ ~ ",;T ,5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: ~
(a) Changes in the diversi[y of speczes, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals includinq
rep[iles, fish and shellfish, benthic orqanisms,
insects or microfauna) ? . . . , . . , , , , , ,
(b) Reduciion of the numbers of any unique, rare, or
endangered species of fauna ? , . . , , , . . , . , x
(c) In[roduction of new species of fauna into an area, or
result in a barrier to the migration or movement oi fauna? . ~
(d) Deterioration of existinq fish or wildlife habitat?
Explan?*ion:
i e s M a► c Nlo
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase exis[ing noise levels? x _
Explanation: Additic~nal peal:le will restilt in increasea rioisc: let,:JIs.
I- :'-Jur building sites and construction of necessary roads 4r_-:
utilities wi11 cr: ate an interim si,anifican - jjacre--i,-.p
;:1n ov _r:31 1 rni ,or 'nc r^as p ni,, e r1e t,--,,, 57:>rL n re, r n rp„,
`j'es Maybe lVn
Lic;}-i: and Glare. Will the proposal pr(,duce new light or +__;larc
Explanation: Ad .ional nc;,;--~-• 1y--: •1 -r,, ~ 7 r~~~ .r
~ i c t•r i .
Yes Maybe No
~i, La?;d Use. ~Vill tile proposal resulc in altcra[ion uf the
present or planned land use of an area . . . , , , . , . Y _
Explanation: The cons4tructiQn of 1+ homes wil1 be n~~1~,~~~-~•.--.-i
to the existing laad use,, ~~:r~ i ; ,'v=-:~~nt►~. +i-_-
t1 , P y r~ 7' _ 1 1 ` ~ l ` - _ -I ==i-=='" , • ~ - ~ ~ r- ~ 1 - •
- 4
- ~
~ ~
.
. ~
(IF SPACE E'OR E}tPLANATION IS INADEQUATE. PI EASE =~1"?'i I r, -M) ('j'If,,~i;L
'i eS ;yUP lv•-
9. Na[ural Resources. Will the pcoposal i•esult fn:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X_
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? g
L'xplanation:
Yes Maybe 10. Ri§k of Up-sgc, Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset condittons x
Exalanation:
Yes Adaybe No
11 . Population. 'r.'Jll che proposal alter the locatioti,
discribution, density, or growth rate o! . the human
population o{ an area? . , , , . , , , . . . , , , , ,
Lx lanation: Th2 incrcase in ~„~orulation mdyve a resui t of,-re-oca_
ti Gri witb. i: 'L 1: ~ metro~- ,7; _ i - _1-•ca , Ihf- tc or th. e Uni- - s~ -c-Ld
'~'~`'_i l~=, ~i~^•-ll i. if~, ~-r,C'~if 11, 'Z'v~•C2;s: t;ii '-1^o i P^i,
~.i1C rlnr.~jl ~t-.i nn d~?nS_i ;:3 ^f t1_~rnjQct- si-t-lp- ;-i 11 l,::v r-~ 1 if:file
if any ori tiie human popul -!~tion of the metropolitan Spakane area.
12. Housinq. Will the proposa affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional housinq? . . , . . , . , . ~ ~
t:xplanation: The sa.me answer t"rom ~11 above applies in the conteyt
r,f hmini n-9 3s.1,ra1 1 a S= nniil ~4-; rr: -
Ycs ~--1aybn Nc
13. Transportation/Circulatian. Vriill the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehfcule r movemF,nt ? . . . . . x _
(b) Effects on existing parkinq facili[ies, or demand for
new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -
(c) Impact upon existfng transportakion systems? . .
(d) Alterations to present pa[terns of circulation or
movemenG of people and/or goods? . . . . . . , . ,
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? -x
(f) Increase in tri-iffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . , , , , , , .
ExplanaEion: ,T;,`1e-.-Cfl11C8.~'.t nf ftmi t~ratt yp-r-Rus arFa wi riA l,o--
important to undersLand in addressing the transporatiorl/
circulation issues. Yes ? the "micro" an ~1_--si s reveals :ir_
impact on the site gince no traz"fic Iz x- ;~,-;•,~r~r ; ~u~ ;i P
~,rior ~o o~~ ; _vt:~~r th
, e ir:lt~---ct~ or: e e~.~;~~;,t.n;
~ '-,i: f
::c 1 -:7'ccr-i-,c~cd az•:~~ r... ~ ~ ? ~
S
r
(IF SPACE FOR E}CPLANIITION IS INADE()UATE, PI-EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes M •jyh.r P_o
14. Public Services. Wlll the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a neeci for necv or aIterPd qovemmPntal servtces
in any of the following areas ?
(a) Fire pro[ectfon? . . . . , . . , . . , . , , . , x _
(b) Police protection ? . . , . . . , , , , , . , . , _ I _
(c) School s ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x ~
(d) Parks ur other recreativnal facflicies ? . . . . , , , , X _
(e) Maintenarce of public facilities, including roads? _
(fl Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . .
Explanation: The locai firc ,-achool anu ra :d dis-urict i•vrill be
im-Dacted bv ca-dciitional iiQUSing, and roads. The
affe_i~ vai 1 1 lie oi -F sc~;: ►.c; qnrnP rl Zre_b•,r addit-l'oD.al tax
, , n l _r g
thereon. Yes MayUe 1To
1 S. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? x
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require ~
the development of new sources of energy?
Explanation:
Yes M3ybe No
16. tilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
system s, or alterations to the following utilities:
,
(a) Power or natural gas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
(b) Communication aystems? . . . . , . , . . . . . . X ~
(c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
(d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . x
(e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x _
(f) Solid waske and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . x _
Explanatfon: All utilities will -Ue impacted ; howevcr primarily
through extension of existina svstemp rather than new or
altexed svstems. Sewaa dzsvo5al ( on-sit e) 3nd storm water
draina; e.will ~C reQuired.
Ye s Maybe No
17. Human Health. Will [he proposal resUlt in- the creation oi
any heaith hazatd or potential health tazard (excluding
mental health) ? . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ~
Explanation: This answ:~r is t~asea on: avdilable facto an~,l ti1e lack
Qf u2'2,y deflTlltlvp P_V'1 tj P_t1cP_ n1'1P. w.iy n1^ t.'nP c]t.C1a'r"_
-6-
. '
.
. r
. .
(IF °PACE FOR n{PLANATION IS INADEQUATE. P.Lr'1SE ATTAGH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
`fes Mavbe Nc
1~.. :1osthel,i<.;s. VV21l the proposal result tn t'.it, uE,stn:c:tion of
.iny scenic vis[a or view open to the p ablic, or will the pru-
F1osa1 result in the creation of an aest}:etically offensive site
r-,pen to public vtew? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~
E::;.~ l
Y~s Maybe No
19. Recreatfon. WLlI the proposal result In an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreati,)nal opportunities g
ExplanctLiort:
20. ArcheologicaliFiistiiicul. Wi11 t}~~ oposal resulc in r3Tl .
alteration of a significant archeoloQici•1 or hiskorical site,
structure, object or builciinq? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . f
E:•:planation:
III. SIGNATt1RE
I, the undersigned, swear under the peiialty of perjury that the above responses are
made truthfully and to th.e best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be
any willful misrepresentatfan or willful lack o f full disclosure on my part, Spokane County
may withdraw any declaration of nonslgnificance that it might issue in re!lance upon this
checkli st .
Date: Proponent:
tiTe s Cro sby
(Please Prtnt or Type)
Proponent: vies
I
Address: I,To_rtil I uu i i:i _ :'cl=-u - . `
Phone: 922-2200
Person completinq form: ~:i ~_1 t.. Se nakP, ~ p• L•
Phone:
Date: c~ ~ /77
.
Dzpt, or Office of County Reviewing Cnecklist: ~
~
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: `
1I7,rr
-
-7
' • i 0 • . • 4 _ 1. ~ t . ♦ 4 . . ' - . •
t . . . , . ' • ' ^ _ 1 ~ ' i
` ~ ^ • ~ ' 1 ' ♦ ♦ • _
l . . Y • • . .
. y~
~ 5PO~ANE VALLEQ FIRE DEPARTIAENT
. cAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 -
~ . . . ~ ~ . ~ September 13, 1977 ~ ` .
, , ~ . . . .
~ ' ~ ~ ' • • . ' ( , r ~ • ~ • Y • • • . ' • , • ♦ 5,~y , " : . J ~ + y ~ . •
Mr. Fred. Dayharsh, Pl anning Director
.Spokane County Planning Commission - . " ~ ~ . ~
North 811_ Jefferson
Spokane,-_ Was hi ngton 99k201 ,
• ' j ~n ` ~ . , , . . ~ ~ ' ~ . . . , _1 t' • • . , • ~,j( , ~i'`s`l~'~w,+"'1 . : tC~ 7 .~~y. .f ~ • ' t: r
Oea r- Mr:}j'_Dayharsh ~ ~ . rr~~. , • ' , . y . R,. ' , . ' . . - ~ ~ . ;s~. ` . _ ~ .
, '`~,i1 ~ . > . . W ' , , ~ , • - . , ,
. g g protection:
I - The followin Zone Chan e ha eeq reviewed for fire -
P~ .
PE-1135-77 Schneidmilljer-Mains an` hydrants need to be installed .
. ZE-146 -77 -in. this area.
/PE_1136-77 . Hodges,/In,c.-Mains and h d~rants need to be installed .
ZE- 147-77 in thi sr area
PE-1137-77 Crosby~M,a ~}~'ns an~rhydrants need to be installed - ~
ZE- 148-77 i n thrs <ar4~
~ PE-1138-77 Bur~Tingtop ~orthern,, In,c ; bla;i~nsl, and hydrants need to ~
1be° i nsta=l~~l ed i n , th a rea
• ~ ~ ~1•R~`Y~` , • ' , e ~
PE-1031-76 i,
ege.'`Ma~ins and :-hydra~ ts ~need to, be i nstal 1 ed i n .
_ ~ ~ ~y~'' , - - •
ZE- 90-7 thr-s~area
~~•4
,
`s..rti T~~ -~-`9 Y:,~ ; ` ~ ' ' . •
i. . ;Y.~~7; • \ ~ • . . . .
~ ~ ~ ,;t v +i~~~~;~„"~;' '';~-~:s: i~; v ~ . - ' .
Sincerel
y! ~
~ , J ~ *ML~ 1;Q,i~,;~,•~`~" ' ' . '~.i~l~ ~'~~~y~ V4*
~
Coo k of Ins ecto~^ s
. . ~ , ~ . .
~
~ AG: s n ` ~ ,d ` ~ . - .
-"Y
~ E C E ~ ~ ~ . , . u . 't ' . •
` . 1 1 ' ' , . ~ t , .
_ SEP141477
SPOKANE COUNTY
' PLA3VNiNG DEPARTMENT . ~ . ~ . ~ : ; .
• , - • ' • r . ' ~ ~ ' . ? „ . , ~ ,
. ~ . PREVENT FIREs SAYE LIVEs J . ~
' ` ~ . ~ , ~ ' ° i . . ~ . • • • I . . : • , ' `rf . . `
CpGy , ~ .
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
h
; Inter-Offi ce Communi cation
q~TN o`S1
Date: September 1, 1977
T0: Spokane County Planning Commission
FROM: Eugene C. Prather, R.S.
SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat --DORN COURT ADDITION
1. Ref erences :
a. Map of subject by Masgai, scale 1" = 40' dated*August 10, 1977.
b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane
and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water
Resources, State of Washington, 1969.
c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the
Spokane Valley, D. K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study-Met-
ropolitan Spokane Region, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle
District, April 7, 1975.
d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation.Service,
U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conser-
0
vation Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974.
f. Logs of Washington Water Power Company wells in Township 25, Ranges
43 and 44, Sections 13 and 18.
g. Field Survey Report, Dick Ellis, Spokane County Health District,
August S, 1977.
h. Map: Spokane NE Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Topography, soils and water.
a. This project lies in a relatively f lat area northeast of Dishman.
Local drainage ways are insignif icant. It is located over the Spokane
Valley Aquifer.
b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5%
slopes. They have a septic tank f ilter field limitation of slight
with possible contamination of groundwater.
c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand
and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undiffer-
entiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably
been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate
to very large amounts of water. R E C E I V E
SEP 71977
. SPOKANE COUNTY
SCHD-ADM-118 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ DORN COURT ADDITION
` Page 2
September 1, 1977
d. The data from Washington Water Power Company wells in the area
shows the wells are 110 feet deep and have static water levels
varyfng from 63 to 68 feet below the surface. The total nitro-
gen level was 1.3 ppm. The Washington Water Power Company has
indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat
upon completion of agreements with the developer.
3. Impact discussion.
, .
a. The plat sponsor has proposed 4 lots on 1.15 acres with a typical
lot size of 75 by 130 feet. Each lot is to be served by a
public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal
system. This raises the question of signif icance of the impact
on the groundwater in the area and possible al.ternatives for
sewage disposal.
b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd
considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge
to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development
in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater.
In summary, he concluded that:
(1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of
sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the
groundwater.
~ 2) All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be
carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and
detergents (phosphate portion) are mostlq removed
by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor _
dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are
known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which
are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total
found in septic tank effluents.
(3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of ground-
water flow line indicate that the maximum range of
(dissolved) solids concentration expected at present
(1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above
the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The
forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration
is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."---"The
analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020
when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentra-
tion, indicate that the present impact on groundwater
quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate
level."
c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content
of the groundwater as in the range of 1.3 ppm. A projected incremental
increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in tanges
of 1.4 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit
up to 10 ppm.
" DORN COURT ADDITION a v
: page 3
September 1, 1977
d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the
groundwater have the following general characteristics:
(1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to
surface waters would require at least tertiary treat-
ment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge
f rom the Department of Ecology. These systems are not
currently economically available for this project.
(2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend
on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons,
have safety hazards associated with them and relatively
poor community acceptance. .
4. Recommend that:
a. A public water system including fire flows serve each lot prior to
sale of the lot.
b. Sponsor provide evidence that the plat lies within the recorded
service area of Washington Water Power Company.
c. Each lot is. authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage
system.
d. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by
this office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than
a total of four (4) dwelling units are authorized within the plat.
cc: Senske & Masgai
East 9923 Sprague
Spokane, WA 99206
~
00
PE-1137-77 & ZE-148-77
In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Wesley Crosby, North 1506 Pines,
Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Dorn Court. Also to consider changing
the Zoning Map from Agricultural Suburban to Single Family Residential on the proper-ty
described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filfng of a final plat,
or plats, of such property. The property being platted is described as the 1V 1/2 of the S
1/2 of the NE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 J.ying W of the prolongation of the E line
of lots 6 and 7 in Block 1 of Dorn Addition all within Section 18, Township 25 N., Range
44, E.W.M.
(South of Boone Avenue and 300 feet west of Vista Road).
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SSo
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
zoozr1_ T ~
- , Being first duly sworn, deposes and says:
~
That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United
States, a resident of Spokane Courlty, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one
yearso
.
~f
That on 19 , he personally posted three (3) true
,
and correct copie of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the
following places in Spokane County, to-wit:
~rC~ 1~~~'~-• ~
1o Z
L9
20
't' ~ J 1~ 1 - ~2S r M,
- ~
~
~
Subscri'aed and sworn to me
~ 19 '
,
N4TARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHI1VCr'~'O~t
Residing at Spokane, Washington
.
~ SENSKE & -MASGAI, Poso
Civil Engineer,s & Lcrncl Surveyor.s
Cxc ~by 1"Acaition
rrhe FOrth ~ o'L the SoU.th of thc; Mortlic;aast of the
_yiAg I~~Tc.st of tz~~ ~;~ro~
Southcast ~ o:~' t~.e 11fv~.~°~;liQ.1::st ~
icngzat-ion o.L th,,:-~ Ea.ili ~~.nc U.L' ldtp, 6 and rl in 7) -InCiii ~
of Dorn i.dclition all tivi. ~hin Sect ica 1'u', 'i ownship 25 North,
u ~na
;c ~Lr lpa. , ~ t,t af lZ~ ,1~~_~nct
~
Vr
y-
'
. '
> >n J
~ 4 ~f
ooo~~t'G~t't•`'.~
c~
; ~ ~
~
EAS'F 9723 SPRACiUE AVEN UE. • SPOKANE, WASH[NGTUN 99206 s(509) 924-3759
~
e
E X H I B I T A
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM
AREA AND DISTANCE ■OOOOODOO0OOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOODOOOOODO0ODOOo
Total ainount of land in this Subdivision: 12.2 Acres
Proposed density of the Plat: 3t3 Lots/Gross Acre
`_Cotal amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 1,2 Acres
Proposed use of controlled adjoining land: Houses under Co215truCtiori
What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? 2 mil e s
Shopping facilities? I mile Municipal Boundary: 1 mil2 Paved street or highway? 300 t
LAIVD USE ■oo 0 000000000000000000000000000000000t3000o00000000 00000000000000000000
IndicatE the pr.oposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings (
Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes:
Multi-farnzly dwelling units ( Indicate which lots:
MoUile Nomes ( Other ( Describe other uses:
Descri.be any non-residential use proposed in the P1at:
4Jhat is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? V a cC-71L nt
List type of uses: Cvltivated land: acres. Pasture:. acres.
Timber: acres. Vacant: 1*2 ~acres. Other: Acres
I s keeping of animals desired? No ( Yes ( TNype :
IMPROVEMENTS NODOOOOOOOOOOOOE3OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOflO00DO00000000000000000000000000
Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will a.t be a multi-phase dev-
elotiment? Entiretv
To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( Minimumo
Curb ancI Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( X
Describe any combinations of above:
What is the time.period expected for complete development of the Plat: 6 month S Street :_mprovements completed? '6 manths Substantial number of lots occupied? 12 months
Is dedi,;ation of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.)
No. ( x Yes ( Describe:
Indicate the si2e of units proposed to be constructed: 1.2nn Square feet
Number of bedrooms 2 .
Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( Yes (X
Will any special deed re strictions be included in tne sale of lots? No ( g). Yes (
If "yes", explain:
UTILITIES ■ooooo00oooooaooooooooooaooooo0000oooooaooooo0000000oooooaoooooaooaoo
Inclicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( X). Lagoon (
Treatment plant ( Other, or -combinations (Describe) .
Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( Public system (X
Private community system (
Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings):
Underground utility easements ( Overhead utility easements ( X).
Utilities in streets ( No easements (
Indicate the •di-stance from this groposal to the nearest existing water main: 150 feet.
Indicate size of nearest main: 411 Inches.
List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat:
Electricity: 'V.TWP Gas: 1 °J,,~P Water: y1WP Phone: PNB ~
OFFICE Oi COUNTY EN~~~EER
.r SrOKt1NG k..OUNTY1 Y]fA.1H1NGTON - . ,
' Dat~
Inter-office Communicatian
To ?LA~'NIN~ 00%..MS5ION .
From GARY KErALY, PLANNING & TR.AFFIC DIVISION ENGINEEf{ ~ g -
SubjeCt M; Y3 FOR
~C11)IT1GNS Tr~L.D ~PLY ~`O Pi~A'` Jc~ED~'~. COkISIDER.~TI0
.
that cond~~~onal Approval of .ths -plat is ~~.ven subject to ~dedlcatior~ ~of Right of
:Tay t0 t~~ pub~.ic and approval of t~:e road system irt the plat by the Coun*~ Eng'
2that pZans, profiles# and cross sectxons showing prapose(i streeC centerlirxe and cu.rb
grade,s be sebmftted to the Cdunty Engirteer for appraval gxiar to corsstruc't.~~~ at~t3
'Che zilin,~ vf a fi~eal p~,at;
E 3 that drain2~e plarrs a~x~ ciesign calcu~.atians sh4wing, the grades aac~ ~~ls=eat of draia- ,
age iacilities be su~m$Cted to the Cotnty Enajaeer foz appra~~~ Prior ta coastracti.arY
aad- ~h e~ filing af a final plat; F - -
C4 cons~r-~.zctivn w~,.th~,s~ t~re propvsad puT~lic stre-ts a~zd easements shall -be perfo=e~. -
tr
under t1rca direct supervisivn of 2licensed laad surtteyor, .wTno shall be respons1ble - -
for perpetuatiag all evidence of the lacation of survey mon=eats ~ihich may be - - - disturb?d duringr construct3.ortand who shall ferrni,sh the Cou*~ty Eng3~er with r;As
.Built'" g1ans -ar~d a certific~~e 7-n uritina that all iaprovemeats were i,ns~allecl ta
t~~ lines an3 grades showrc an the appraved -constructiozt plan.s and thaL all dist=bed -
II="rents have been. replaaed; . .
~ no cons4r~~tiar± work i's tv be perfornmed within tne Public Rfgh~ ~f Way umtil. a p~ .
~t
has bean issued by the Cvunty Err,oineer. All work is subject to irspection ascd approva? .
by the County Engginear;
~all eons; rucL-ion within the PLblic Rig~~ o IL Way is to be completed prior to fYl,-In¢
the.fznal plat or a band zrr th= amount estimat"ed by the Cou:,Lty Emginazer to cover tine_
cost O~ evn-Qtructivn oz" improvemer_ts, construction eertification, "As Built¢; p?an's,, .
and =o►ru..:tantinS the street centerlines shall be ~iled With the Cou.-Lty Er~gpl,aaar_ ~ 7-n4 direct access from lots ta 1/2 right of ways until such time as ad~~Liona~ right af
ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads.,
e - - - .
E B-no direct access from Iots to Stub Raad connectians until such 'roads are canstructed -
to Cflunty Standards and estabIished as County Roads. '
~
E 9-road desi.gn, rough grading construction, and drainage control for 1/2 ri;hts of ways =
and Stub Road eonnactaons are the responsi6ili.ty af the Develaper. - -
E 10- that the Sponsor shall grepare and submit to the Caunty Engineer a design graposal accept- .
able ta the State Highway Department of the proposed 5tate Highway-Caunty Road inter- t' -
section, State Highraay Department approval of the proposed design must -be recei.ved priorta the filing of the final plat. Inxp-rovemenLs t❑ the State Highway are Lv be tfie respon-
sibility of the Sgonsor and may either he construct'ed or a bond to cover the eost of such
improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as de'termine,d hy the"County .
Engineer and the State Highway Department.
'ha~ a1.1 -roac~s ~~rithiri t~ie p]~at %e curbed an~/or pa~.red to the ~r~eci~°~ ca,tior~, o~` ~~e C~~~~~r
Engineer. Ex1s~~~~ ~our-ty roads -crovid~g direct access to 10ts of 'Uhe r~lat shall be - -
~ paved and/or curbed to the standara5 of t'ne C aunty Engi_neer.
• '
e . f
. +
'.a
I ; ' • • r . . + • ' _ ,1_Yi
_ _=r J
r. • yRq 'y•~_ - • 5 ~Iy ~bj
• • - _ . < i'F.`a~'v
~
i
*
E X H I B I T A Page2
PRE:LDlINARY PLA2' APPLICATION FORM (Continued)
ACKNOWLEDCMENTS ■oooooooaooooo00oooooaooooo0000oooooaooooaooaooooaoooooooaaooooo1
PROPOSED PLAT NAME : CrosbY Addit ion ,
I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has
heen pr y me under my supervision in accordance wi-th the requirements of the Spokane
Lp D . ~
Co .~q artment and the ws of the,State of UJashington.
O a10*p ` ^
• ~ '~C" o
0
Signed) ew ry Date : 8/15 /77
157-
Address) East 9723 Spra.gue Phone : 924-3759
.w
.
~°~~;••~~caSTE~~~
. . ~ °t A N p Spokane, ~JA Zip: 99206 ,
SUR~YOR' L :
please print
the sponsor of this proposed subdivision, am the
(owner C builder ( agent ( option holder ( contract holder C
of the property proposed to be platted and have completed the information requested of ine and
do hereby testify that it is correct and accurate.
. ; , . (Signed) Date : 8/19/77
. ; . .ti..
~ ` . (Address) North 1506 Pines Phone: 922-2200
. ~ Spokane, WA Zip: 99216
~ Np+rARy Date : NOTARY SEAL Special Comments: , ,~~-J ! 1 ' l'f ' ^ • ~
■000000oooOOOOOOOOO• THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 0=00=000000000000M
PLANNIIVG DEPARTMENT INFORMATI0N
T
Date Submitted: qiK- Checked by: ~
oo
School District: ~Preliminary Plat Fee: L4->
Existing Zoning: 9".Y~Date established: .
Zone Change File No.: Adverti sed Zone Upgrading :
Number of Lots: Location: Section TownshiP Range~q
~
- Plat File No. : ~ ~ Plat Name : -