The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1132-77 AGENDA, AUGUST 19, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ' . I Time: Friday, August 19, 1977, 9: 30 A, M, I Place: (PLEASE NOTE) CountyCommissioners Assembly Room, County Court House . PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFTCATION UPGRADING 11. PE-1132-77, Gentry Subdivisfon ZE- 139-77, Agricultural to Single Famfly Residential and/or Two Family Resldential a. Locatfon: Section 14, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W. M. The East 35 feet of the IVorth 445.3 feet of Tract 55 of Vera and the W 1/2 of Tract 56 of Vera, except the East 53 feet, also except the W 70 feet of the S 160 feet, also except the W 150 feet of the E 203 feet of the S 140 feet, and also except the IV 40 feet of the S 180 feet of the W 75 feet of the E 128 feet thereof. b. Sponsor: F. V. Seipp South 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineer: Charles E. Simpson North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 d. Site Size: Approximately 3.5 acres e. Number of Lots: 10 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Duplexes g. Existtng Zoning: Agricultural, March 27, 1942 ho Proposed Zoning: Single Family Residential and/or Two-Family Residential f o Water Source: , Vera Power and Water j. School District: Central Valley School District k. Environmental Impact:. A topic of dfscussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. M 1 . S DR.40 ~ ~ oo• _ f % , < t • ~ i r a ~ ' AOOf+ 2 i f ♦ ' . . a NOCt a 4o- ~ w.loc c^rw e°ww . . ~ ~jJ" 6 ~ • IN7ER-4TOTE H*a1"Y A14 t AY AVG ~ r~ o~TN „f s.uHen ^ Z t = u . rt .q,~+eta Sc ~ a r ~ ° - v..a L DM fnaY r__? , . . I _ . . u. .li@~ Y i ~ O ~ r~ • / ~ ' ! M M11M Y J r ti ` - 3" • J 1' 'a _ . .r h A vo - ~t ` scALr. ~AL_E ~ ° _ wv • ~ ~1[LR_ . fcw-0. • •w . x . ' ~ ~ ~E PPI vwTH pr . 4Tu I ~ . 1^ r ~I t 1 4i0G[ . o LLCE aa~o• • ~ LL-- . . . , ~ Q IT~~~t,I QTM ulj • - "'-c I 1...}' ~ I. 11 r',/ / ' .CI • ~ - \ ~ , „ . . • _ r ~j`~/ - - - v~FiA D, A.E October 4, 1977 Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 RE : GENTRY SUBDIVISION Dear Sir: This letter is to verify that the easements as shown on the final plat are acceptable to the Vera Water & Power District. Sincerely, William J. J b Assistant Manage db #132 #950 e 77 cc: Mike Pnillips, Simpson Engineers R E C E I V E OCT 6 1977 SPOKANE COUNTY PlANNING DEPARTMENT l'• / r . ~ First American Title Company o fSpokane . :11:11N QI%F'IC,,E ESCR0W OFFICL; ~ II'est 704 Fit:st AvFriue North 8611 Diuision •.Suite B Sl)okanc, tit'asfiington 99204 Order No. 15780 Spokaite, tiVashirtgton 99208 Phn.ite: (509) 456-0550 cc • Clarence Simpson Engineers Phone: (509) 454-1600 Planning.,Commission PLAT CERTIFICATE Proposed Plat of Gentry . Subdivision TO: Wolfland, Inc. South 717 Pines Road Spokane, Washington Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of October 3, 1977 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following propErty: The tqest half of Tract 56, VERA, according to plat recorded in Volume ~ "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Sookane County, Washington; EXCEPT the East 53 feet thereof ; ALSO EXCEPT the West 70 feet of the South 160 feet; , ALSO EXCEPT the t^lest 150 feet of the East 203 feet of the South 140 feet; AND EXCEPT the North 40 feet of the South 180 feet of the West : 75 feet of the East 128 feet. ; AND the East 35 feet of the North 445.3 feet of Tract 55, VERA, according to plat rECOrded ir. Volume •"C" of Plats, Page 30, ir, Spo:{ane Countly, . laashington. This company certifies that record title is vested in WOLFLArdD, I?vC. , A WASHINGTOV CORPORATION, free from all liEns, encumbrances and objec- tions, except as follows: , 1. GENERAL TAXES : Year: 1977, last half , Amount: $45.95 Tax Account No.: 14544-1129 Affects : The West half of Tract 56 R E CE IV E . 0 CT 51977 *CONTZNUED* SpOKANE COUNTY pLANN1NG DEPARTMENT Affi/tated KTth First American Trtle Insurance Company -s ' NO. 15 78 0 Page 2 . Plat Certificate 2. IRRIGATION IaSSESSMENT : For: 1977, last half By: Vera Irrigation District No. 15 Amount: $19.00 Affects: Parcel 1 NOTE: There will be a$1.00 charge by the County Treas.urer if the above Assessment becomes delinquent. 3. Contract-between Vera Electric Water Company and A. C. Jamieson and others, dated April 25, 1908, and recorded in Volume "H" of . . Contracts, Page 292, relating to water and electric service on said property, providing for a lien for unpaid charges for such service, and providing for rights of caay for ditches, pipe lines, etc. . NOTES: - l. General Taxes for 1977: Amount : none - ' Tax Account No.: 14544-1018 Affects: Tract 55 This company further certifies that all'taxes and assessments levied r and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. . . , FIRS AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ; _ / ' . . ~ ~ . La-rry U. Dunston . . Assistant Secretary LD/ml . K •j . ~3-4 NOo- ~ ~ BEF'~ THE BQARD QF COMY COMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE CQUNTY, WASHINGTONo 24:•l~ v•,~k~ ~ ) Iat '.iHL XAV?..R Ok' i;1WttT:~:'s s1t'i:.:r ~~"f3~' ,x. ~i .'~Ap' ~ , ~ AC~'.=~U.,~l~1r, :i~ ''Wp mmI~,y :i~.'~A~ ~ R E S O L U T I O N t~ ~WInT' -rf3~A~7-:-J IN •~lwti.:` 44, 2>.W•X. 5PVrrt1~8;+ W.c.ti Y. i vlASMY L xi ~ ~ The above-enti'tled matter comiag on regularly for hearin,g beforo the 8oard of County Coaaroissioners of Sjpoksne County►, -Washington, on this day, and. it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planniag Commissioa hae given due notice of the hearing, on the matter in the msaner and .f.or the: time-pro.vided :by law; that eaid Plenniag Commission has held a public hearing as' required; aad that the.sai.d Planning Commission concure ia the plan to zone the following described property as: 'T`«1O FAML T RM]~fffIAh T. oAcL Y> oat c t_ A L: t . 44; * 3 ; t 4 t`.o 'W rt `Zruvt 56 o~' Vor~~ onept t;te L`aet 53 #jrt, 4,nc ~xca¢,t t o W VO 7rr~t . t'.9 3 160 14ot ~ ~l&Q exeop", t o 1~ ~ ~O feeti aJ t le ~ s 3 w 4;j :.'tret, ttuiid except J -40 il~et a~:' tit-e S 1 t; aeet c..,f t.;tv W 7 "raeL t r~ 2 12.-f'eas°t 39_11ZYou z4g Z; t KiAuge 449 L.W.K. SpQkakLe Wae.. ngt ri.. All that area glatted as Geietry'a Snbdivision, Saction 14,1 Townahip 25, RaAp 44, E.WJl. NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESMVED, that the above-described property be g and the seme bereby is zoned under 'the claseificatioa of ~4 as defined in the Zoning. Ordiaanae of Spokaae CounYadop~1est 25, 1953, as anrended e PASSED BY THE BQARD THIS i7 DAY OF- 4"ZOA44,01 , 1977 ATTEST: BQARD OF COUNTY C4MMISSIONERS OF 3FOI{ANE COUNTY, WASHIN(3TON VM0N ~ OHL;AND Cler~C the Bo `d_~' '~T ~ Deputy lERRY C. KOPET, CHM. uii This is to certify that this is a EN true and correct,~;=q of . Resoluti on No e ~7 passed by Boar th' da9 0f , Bya Deputy I hQreby.certify that I have posted the e►bove changes aad revieioas on the Zoning Map in tho Building Codes Departmen~, and do further certify that the zone claesification chaage, is the eame as described above aad shown on the attached mape , SI($tED: DATEDs ~ ZONE CHAIVGES POSTED ON Z( NG MAPS Application No. Res. No. 77°133V Res. Date )/-D`7°7-) From : To: Posted By:~~:=~ Date Posted: J/-z~° 77 Acres: Sec. Two. Range EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' (Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Wall Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' (File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' ~ (File Map) Metro 411 (Director's Office) Scale: 1" - 2 000' (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - ' M.aa (Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' (Warl lvlap) Front Offi,ce Scale: - 1000' NV311 Map) Middle Jffice Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 400' (Fi1P Map) Tracinq 434 (Sot~h East Zoning Maps) Scale: - 1000" (File Map) 1Vletrc 411 (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' (F:ie Map) Countv-Front Office Scale: i" - 1 mile (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Cards) Middle Office ► - 110 77 13.90 BMRE M BOA,RD OF COUNTY CQMIUSSIOMS OF SP0KAANE CAU14TY, WAS$INGTON. PE-1 132-77 ~ Iii THE fi+lATMR OF FTLTNQr THE r`INAL PLaT ~ OF GENTRY sMIDNISION LOGATED IN ~ R E S 0. I, U T I d N si; CTi-O K ' t 4. Tws H I F 25, R A P l Gw 44, L.W. M1 SFowrl:s COmiTY. WftSHli40T0N. ~ . ) ) ) BE IT RESOLiIED BY THE BOARD OF CflUNTY COMISSIONERS OF yPOME MQNTY, WASHIN(3TON, that the fiaal plat of C,ENTRY SUHDNISIOId T'as east 35 seet of the North 445.3 feet of Tract N of Vera and the W14 oi Tract 56 of Vera, exceut t-e ERet 53 feet, also except tbe W 70 'Leet of the S 160 feet, also exceDt t4e W'i 50 o°eet of tne L 293 toet oi the 8 140 J.'eet, and also except ttie N 40 :.oe°t af the S 160 feet vf t'rie W75 feet of the L 12~ feet thereot. 8ectiaD 14, Tawnehip 25, Range 449 L.W.M. 3gpkane County, Weehington. more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommeadation of the Spokane County Pl.annirig Commi6sion, be, and the same hereby is approved, vrith the exception that the publ-ic rights of way dedicatod in this plat !*;ill nat be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and apgroved by a. oeparate resolution of the Board j of County Gommissionerso PASSED BY TflE BOARD THIS DAY OF , 1 BQARD OF COUNTY COMNTISSIONERS OF SPOKAIJE COtJDITY, WASHINGTONo ,tERRY G. KOPET, C}IM. HARRY M. IARNED AmTE►sT: w. OHLAM7 rk of Ire/coar L "0 0 By: • Deputy 6 FINAL PLAT CHECK LIST 1 . Final Plat Leroyed 2. Subdivision name 3. Section, township & range 4. Sponsor(s) name (s) 5. Engineer or surveyor 6. Sheet size 24" X 36" 7. North point, scale (100' - 1" or 2 00' - 1 8. Boundary Llne 9. Location & widths of proposed streets, alleys, rights of way, easements, parks, open spaces,& proper labeling of spaces to be dedicated to the public 10. Layout & names of adjoining subdivisions a. Replats - Layout & Name of the replat shall be shown by dashed lines 11. Street names - consistent with existing streets in city and county. Check aqainst name s on round name wheel. 12. Lot sizes - i.e. , 80' X 125' with 10, 000 sq. ft. r for single family lot Cul De Sacs - 80' at building line l;i . Layout, numbers, and dimensions of lots & parcel s _ 14. Necessary engineering data , 15. Does dedication state if individual water and/or public sewers will be provided in accordance With preliminary plat of approval. . 16. Notarized certification by a professional land surveyor. 17. Private re striction s, if any 18. Number and type of units 19. Dedication of streets to the public 20. Easement verification & illustration 21. Check easements, clouds on property, etc. from Title Report . e/ I'r ~f / % L__, ~ l ~ru t • i ~ ~ ~~~~1 ~ Pacific Northwest Bell Spokane, September 209 1977 Spokane County Planning Commission . North 311 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washi ng ~on 99201 - Dear Sirs: The Utility easements shown on the final plat of Gentry Subdivision are satisfactory to the Pacific Northvrest Bell Telephone Company. G. D. Fleming Ri ght-of-4Jay Agent - iVorth 904 Columbus Street Spokane, GJashington 99202 cc: Simpson Engineering N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Wash. 99206 R E C E I V E SEP 21 1977 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMEN7 N~ ~ ♦ ,1. ' r~- ~i~,.~ = !r ~~1'+ ~ First American Title Company o f Spokarw MA1N OFFIC'E ESCROW OFFICE ji'est 704 First Avenue North $611 Division • Suite $ Spokane, Wc,shington 99204 Order No. 15780 Spokane, Wnshingtan 99208 Photic: (509) 456-0550 cc • Clarence Simpson Engineers Phone: (509) 484-1600 Planning Commission PLAT CERTIFICATE Proposed Plat of Gentry Subdivision TO: Wolfland, Inc. South 717 Pines Road Spokane, Washington Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of September 13, 1977 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: PARCEL I: The West half of Tract 56, VERA, according to plat recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane County, Washington; EXCEPT the East 53 feet thereof; ALSO EXCEPT the West 70 feet of the South 160 feet; ALSO EXCEPT the West 150 feet of the East 203 feet of the South 140 feet; AND EXCEPT the ?Vorth 40 feet of the South 180 feet of the West 75 feet of the East 128 feet. PARCEL II: The East 35 feet of the North 445.3 feet of Tract 55, VER.A, according to plat recorcled in Volume "0" of Plats,- Page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. _ This company c:ertifies that record title is vested in GLE-NDA GENTRY, AN UNMARRIED PERISON, AS TO PARCEL I, AND tiaOLFLAND, INC., A--WASHINGTON COR- PORATION, AS 7'O PARCEL II, free from all liens, encumbrances and objec- tions, except as follows : 1. GENERAL 7'AXES : Year : 1977, last half ECED Am n : 4 5 . E I V ou t $ 95 Tax Accotint No.: 14544-1129 Affects : Parcel 1 SEP 2 5 ~9~~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING pEPARrME *CONTINUED* Nr Affiliated xith First Amencart Title Insurance Company Plat Certificate 1 ~ No. 15780 Page 2 2. IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1977, last half By: Vera Irrigation District No. 15 Amount: $19.00 Affects: Parcel 1 NOTE: There will be a$1.00 charge by the County Treasurer if the above Assessment becomes delinquent. 3. Contract between Vera Electric Water Company and A. C. Jamieson and others, dated April 25, 1908, and recorded in Volume "H" of Contracts, Page 292, relating to water and electric service on said property, providing for a lien for unpaid charges for such service, and providing for rights of way for ditches, pipe lines, etc. 4. SALE AGREEMENT: Vendor: Glenda Gentry, a divorced-person dealing in her separate property Vendee: Samuel P. Gentry, a single.man Original amount: $9,000.00 upon terms and conditions therein contained Dated: November 11, 1974 Recorded: November 22, 1974 Auditor's Fzle No.: 7411220157 Excise Tax Receipt No.: 108788 Affects: Parcel 1 NOTES: ~ ~ 1. General Taxes for 1977: Amount: none Tax Account No.: 14544-1018 This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeab.;-e have been fully paid except as noted above. FIRS~ AMERICIaN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY . ~ Vunston La`rry Assistant Secretary LD/ml Charge: $25..00, plus $1.28 sales tax ftopill 247 7~ . , ~ i F14% Qi ~ - 1 1 • t ~ 4 , . • 1 ~ ~ ' • • ~ ! ~ St 14A ~ ~ • ~ 411~ - ' ,t " 4 j ~ ~ ~lc. ' i ~ • ~ . ulp , _ , 1 ~ . h ' . , ~ ~ ~ ~4~'r+►;«.,~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ` ~-5~7; 4r ~ y . ♦ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ 'r ► ~ ; ~ ~ ,,t , ~ 04 ~ ~ ~ t - ~ y ~ . . . ► ~ . ~ ~ t+~ ~ C' ~ j " 1 ! ~ i ~ r , (7D 1 ~ , ' `k • ~ 10 ~ ' ~ 1~- ~ , , ,y - ~ 1 1'1% r_ l.) ' ~ ~ ~ ~:J 1 1 1~" ; ~ r , . . •Q ~ ~ ~ Y ` ' , ~ ~ • . ► ~ ~ . • 4 ~I ~ J ~ C • 1 ~ ~ ?c~' 1 ' ~ ' . ' ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~:;1 ; i i r : ~ • ' ~ , . j ~ ~ ~ ~ x.:~ . . r„ ~ ► ~ 1 . " r , ~ ~ftac~ Wc1 VO" M ~ SE; IC REF. #Pj fE -I i32`-7 7 ~ ' ~ ► l. THRESHOLD DETERMINATION D ECI.ARATIOP3 OF (propo ed/fin il) -}T~.►._ , _ (significance; nonsignificance) 1. Description of Proposal: -!Su Ro I VI S 10/'.) nr --1- 3.S GLr V-Qs OF LA&ID LNTD ~.rJL? [Q M R&~.nOPtEX . , - ~~'~1T RY SL1~~i V~~ 141~ . ? . F i'~?'1~:T1C: 'vv~.~~~'a- 3. Ccm~art Ferson: Phone: 9~82~'92 3 . Cr)unty Action(s) Requested: f99QMJ&AL\C FINAL B.A-T 401--t'Q + , . Lc~t~acic:n of Propesal: 0~ $1 DE CF' \IALLEY 'Q c~ Y-4 L~-~ OF s w vA4.1 RD_ Lead Aqency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to have a stgnificant adverse impact on the environmPnt. An EIS is _140T required under RCW 43 . 21C . Q30(2) (c) This ciecision was made after review by che County of a completed environmental checl:list ~nd oth;-r informa,.fr.)n on file with the leZ,d igPncy. . Responsible Offfcial: Proposer] D~~claration: Final Declaration: (na me ) ( a me C • IC.7-,L~d (siQnature si ature) : (j tle)D[2~~, titl C de L~IVII~C~ (de t . .ja d(date) (date Dspartmont Reference No. : Pff- 1132 -77 (See Reverse Side) 7. For Declarations o# Significance Only; Date of Expected D-aft EIS Availability (determined by Rosponsible Offtcfal) Date Entered in "CIS in Preparation Register" (determined by SIIPA Public Information CPnter) To be completed by responsible official: a. Brief ciescription and listlnq of those en•dronmental impacts Ieading to such declaration: b. Brief explanation of what measures, If any could be taken by the appllcant to pre- vent or mitigate the envlronmental tmpact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible offlctal could consider << revised proposal wlth a posslble re- sulting declaration of nonsignificance: S. ForPronQsed Declarations of Nonsignificanc;e Qnly: Date Entered "Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance Regis[er" (detc:rmined by SEPA Public Information Center) Date comments to be received (15 day r-eview period) (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) , 9. SEPA Public tnformation Center: (For depariments of General Government only) ( ) Approved as to form Disapproved as to form Reasons: Signature of SEPA PIC Officer: Date: a M SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING DEPARTMENT ` i~~~~y;,, PUBLIC WORKS BUIIDING N. 811 JEfFERSON STREET ~ M + PHONE 466-2174 8POKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 _.nhL .i.'l••'` -I~T NC i,t M E M O RA N DU M (2) T O o 3 o. C.O. f 1 tt~ D I ST. ~1 ~ 0 S~S C o. A L T I~. D I S`~ S P qo ToM jus T ice E. Io3 i1 SYo-AteuE F R O M: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 509-456-2274 Attention: _fiOB ea&AQDg R E F E R E N C E: Lead Agency Designation, Proposed Declaration of Non- significance, Envi.ronmental Checklist, etc. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: G ENTu O v ~I I qN fw -113 2-17 The following is explanation for this determination: WAG 111- rQ -Z-SQ Information on file conceming this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY OF jURISDICTION, WAC 197-10-044 (4). Accordingly, if you wish to exerclse your optton to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advised that the proposal was listed in the SEPA Public Information Center bn: 8/23-17 GCOTIN DEPT. FILE REF . 3 ~ ~ r +f f~ I 7~~ I I' s:.0 K 4 `-`N~. V"R' STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the • S~~ . The following data briefly describes the proposal: ~ A. Action Requested: ~1' C' ~ B. Descri tion of Proposal: Jl*v t -S I - ~ 1~ p~~ 10 C. Location of Proposal: WE-4 ! II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: . . , • usz~ . ~ . . / Z . .J-5 . . . • . . - ~ (Over) - - B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following que s tion s : C. Discussion of impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendations: , EodL 2rBased on II A, B and C above, the staff p _ . , . • ~ . 11~2-?7 , - v 1 ! ~p ~ ~~'~l7I~:~'~~~t'1~' ~ ~ I -JNAAC (CrVhS• COU167 NUV%C ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43,21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider envUonmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private prAposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions signlficantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpQSe of thfs checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the follawing questions as compietQly as you can with the information presen[ly available ro you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will restilt. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to qovernment decfsion-makers, include your explanation in the sgace provided, or use additlonal pa ecs, if necessary. You should include references to any ceports or studtes of which you ace aware and whlch are relevant to the answars you provide. Complete answecs to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not iust to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not accur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future, No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for everv "Yes" and "maybe" answec on the checklist, The person completinq the form may be required to provide explanntions for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a chreshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local aqencies in the State of Washington for various typea of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, s n rer it "no" and continue on to the next question. E I V E J U L 1 51977 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI3T FORM 0 KA N E C 0 U N TY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1, BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponen[: Wol f i and, Inc. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: '.nes~el 717 Spokane, Wash 99216 928-2592 3. D-3te Checklist Submitted: , 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Staokane COUntY. Wa t 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: GentrX Su division - 1 - (IF SPACE FOR EXPI.ANA'I'ION IS INADEQliATE, PLEAS£ ATTACT-: !1T??)ITI(?PvAL Pt1GES.1 ti, Nac►ire ar.d Brief Descriptian af t'tze Proposal (incluc.iing but not liii,: -i to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- s t ,~nding of i ts scope and nature) : Con~truction of a road of approximate lenath of T' CEN7L~'o2 1IW i n thg wesim f thP orooo., sed_o, ropert,~.hi9 si te wgUld be for the constructiQn Qf/AS duplpx 1Qts. Location of Proposal (describe Ciie pnysical set:ing of [h.2 progasz-,! , as vrEll as [he extenc of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information neecied to give an accurate understanding of the environmental seeting of the proposal) : JN /"p Cj This property is located, Valleyway Z -A zmwkR Reed7- with 8. Estim.sted Date for C-_>rnple[ion Of Ch!? Froaosal: So..~ r i na of 1 g28. 9. List of ail Permits, Licenses or Gavenlment Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones): ' stare kfea1 th WatQr ma* .3 t 10a. Do You,or the owner !n the event you clo not own the subject land, have any plans for future additlons, expanston, or fucther activlty related to or con- nected with thls proposal? If yes, explain: No lOb, Do you own or have optlons on land n(ic:rby or adjacent to this proposal's locatlon? If yes, explaln: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others lncluding the owner which may affect chc property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: No 12. Attach any other application forrn tha[ fias neen completed regarding ttie proposal; if none has been completed, but is expec[ed to bQ filed at some future date, describe the na[ure of such applicatlon focm: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACI's (b`xplanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe Na 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in qeologic X s tructures ? . . . . . . . . . • • . . . . . • . - (b) Disruptians, displacements, compaction or overcoverinq X of the soil ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~ . r M ~ ~ . ~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS IN?1DEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDZTIONAL PAGE6.) Yes MaYbe No (c) Change in topo(iraphy or graunci stirf.-ace relief features? x (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique X geologic or physical features? . . . , . . . . . . . _ (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (fl Chanqes in depositlon or erosion of beach sands, ar ti changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed af x the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: By excavation for bagements fo,l new home sites you may hayp ~nrnP di gp1 arenPnt of sfli 1. Ys~. Mayl2e ILQ 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? _ (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . , . , . . . X (c) Alteration of air mavement, moisture or temperature, or any chanqe in climate, either locally or regionally? „X_ ~nlanatian: MaY have some i ncreased ai r emi ssions by more _car traff i c -_and also from furnaces or.fireplaces from new homesites. 3. Water, tillill the proposal result in: Yes r.-Taybe N ~ (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters x (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or X the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Altera tions to the course or flow of flood wa ters X (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water X body? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) D:scharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? _X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direc[ additions or withdrawals, or through interception X of an aqulfer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . (h) D,--terioration in qround water qualiry, either through direct inJection, or throuqh [he seepage of leachate, phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other 9ubstances into the ground waters? X (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available X for public wuter supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explan:icion: May have an effect on q. h. or i due to the nqw home construction, _3 , (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADDC?UAT4 PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,) YeS M.tvbe ~N'o 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in ttie diversity of spectes, or numbers of any species .3f flora (including tre-es, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . X (b) Redu-cion of the numbers of any uaique, rare or endangered species of flora? , . . . . . . . . . . . _ -X- (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • X (d) Reciuction in acreage of any aqricultural crop x Explanation: , Yes Navbe No 5. Fauna. Will the prnposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, X insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered spocies of fauna ? . . . . . . . . . . . -X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or X result in a barrier to the mtgration or movement of fauna? . , (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _X Explana:ion: 1'es M.3 ► e No 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?... X - Explanation: Due to noi ses corrmon to house hol ds and Qossi bl y doqs & ki ds. Yes MaYbe No 7. Light 3nd Glare. Will the proposal prcxiuce new ught or glare : Explanation: Hause 1 i ahts &_DOSS 'Lbl v street 1 i qhts . 1'es Maybe No 8, Land Use. %ti'ill the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area ' . . . . . . . • • • --x- - Explanation: The vacant 1 and wi 11 become homesi tes. . 4 ~ , I M M . (IF SPACE F4R IXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PI.EASE ATTACFI ADDITIOIVAL PF,GES.) , Yes M,Rvbe Ivo 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposai result in: X (a) IncreasE in the rate of use of any natural resot,rces? (b) DopleCion of any nonrenewable natural resource? x Expianacion: Onl y by a i ncrease of homesi tes. Yes Maxie 10. Risk of Uaset. Does the proposal lnvolve 3 risk of an explosion ar the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pestfcides, cfiemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions X Explanation: - Yes Maybe No 11. Population. VI,'ill the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth cate ot the human population of an area? . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~X ! Expianation: Onl y by/O dupl exes 12. Housinq. Will the proposa] a:fect existing housing, or X create a demand for aclciitional housfn9? . . . . . . . . . - ExpIanatian: Only by_/O duRl ex si tes. Yes Maybe Nc 13. Transportation/Circulation, Will the proposal result in: X (a) Generation of addiLional vehiculi! r movem,•nt ? (b) Effeccs on exfsting parking facilities, ar clernand for new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? X (d) Alkerations to presenc patterns of circulation or movement- of people and/oc goods? . . . . . . . . . X - (e) Alterations to waterbome, rail or air traffic? . . . . . . X - (f) Increase in trafffc hazards to motor vehicles, X bicyclis ts or pedes trians ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Explanation: The dupl ex 1 ots wi 11 i ncrease the traf f i c f 1 ow by the amount generated bY the duplexes. - 5 - (IF SPACE FOR E}iPLANATION IS INADEc7UATE, PI.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes r.~?,~~~bc h:~ ~ 14. Public Services, Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered oovemmental sPrvic.es in any of [he following areas? (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (b) Police protectioii? . . . . . . . . . , . , , , , X (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ___.X (d) Parks or other recreatfonal facilities ? . . . . . . . . X ~ (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (f) O ther governmental secvices ? . . . . . . . . . . . X ~ £xplanation: A1 t my he.eff;ctedhy.the demancl ce:oi.ii t.Pd fnr I~ duo1_t--xe&. Xes Maybe ~.?o 15. Energy. Will the pcoposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of enerqy, or require the development of new sources of energy? _X Explanation: Yes Maybe 'Jo 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to Che following utili[ies: (a) Power or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Communication systems? . . , . , . . . . . . . . X (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . __9 _ (fl Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . X ~ Explanation: lin1y 4~ e installation of sqptic tanks for the proposed homesi t s. A1 so drvwwel l s rriav be regui red to handl e the ,~torm draina~ Yes Maybe IVo 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the crea[ion of any health hazard or potential health tizard (excluding X mental health) ? „ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation : ~ M M . (IF SPACE FQR ECPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P':.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 1r, A;-~sthotiL:s, Will the proposal result ir► rh- c;l,stn:<:ciun af -iny scen[c vista or view open to the p-iblic, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aestr•etically offensive site open to public vicw? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Expl-imition: Yes :vtaybe No 19, Recreation. Will the Droposal result In an impact upon the quality or quan[ity of e:;isting recreati,~onal opportunities X Explana tion: Yes ti4tiyUA Nu 1-0. Elrcheological/Itist~-]:-i_--,,1. Wi11 tfie p-oposal result in an alteration of a significanr archeologic,:l or historical site, stnucture, object or building? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the underslgned, swear under the peiialty of perjury that ttie abOt%r-- resUOiiSES -Irc. made truthfully and to thF best of my knowladge. I also understand that, should there any wlllful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full dlsclosure on my part, Spokane Coun:y may wlthdraw any d+-.claration of nor.slgnlficance that !t mtqF:t tssue tn rellance upon this chec}cli ~ t I]ate: 7 ~ ~-7 7 Propon?nt: r~~*GC1 (Please Princ or 'Iy;-)P) Proponenc: Wol f 1 and, Inc. Address: S. 717 Pi nes Rd Phone: 928-2592 Person comple[ing forrn: Plione: Date: Dapt. or Office of County Reviewing Checklist:~ Scaff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: - 7 - ~&.,ZINEER sPoKANE couNTY, wasHINGzoN DotA Av&toS_T ~ Z , t 9 7 7 tnter-office Communication Tr, PLAN'~IING COtEMISSIOV . (A,Atl F ~L, -ARY KEI~INALY PLAN~IING & TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER a"d"^' rom ~ ' Subject Rp An CGNDITTMIj * FoR, PE W37. 17 Gapi-M-.4 5 #CvNDIT3Gi•ij C1Ri.LED 4P?i,Y 10 aI,_4T (TINDF'_ C011SIJEER.TIOid ~ tnzt conditiorzal approval of the pl.at is givea subject to dedication of Right of ~Tzy to the pu5lic an3 appraval of the road syste3 in thz plat by the CouAty irgiuezr; . that plarzs, profiles, and cross sections showin; proposed street centerZiue and cu.rb C-~ grades b` o submitted to the Cdunty EnQineer fox approval prior to coristructioa and o the ziling of z final _plat; • . . - . E 3.that drainaoe plans and design calculations showing the gradzs aad aliga3teat of draia- zge iacilities be submitted to the Gounty Enoineer for approval prior ta construction z:t3. thz tiling of a final plat; ~cons'Cruction witain the proposzd public 'strests and easements shall -be performed -uader the direct supQrvision oi a licensed iaad surveyor, Who sha13 be resgonsible for p=rp_tcsatiao all Avidence of the locatican o~ surv2y rconuments which may he dis tu: bad duri.ng cons truction and who shall furnish thz Courty En,gi.aeer witI1 "As xuilt" plans- and a c2rtificate in writino that 211 improvempnts wzre iast2lled to thz lines 2n3 grades showri on the 2pproved constz`uctioa plans aad that a12 disturbsd non=eats have been replaced; E 5 na con;truction work is to be pzrfo=ed within t'nz Psblic Right of Way until ap-?rn3t . h=s oszn issuzd by the Counry r.noineer. . All I wark is subject. to inspactioa a.nd apprnva? by thz County Engineer; - . • CLD6all construction within the Public Right of Way is to bz compleLed prior to filing - ~ . the f inal p3at or a bond in th= amount es tiaated by the County Engin=er to cover tcte._ COSt OI COa'13CZ11CtlOi1 OZ 1P.1prOV2m@L:tS, COt1StIZ1CtlOL1 CertZilCatZQII, "AS Built" p?aB.s, . an3 m-onwmanting the street centerlines shall be filzd with the Caunty Engiaazr. E 7-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additional right of .~ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads.- . . . . " _ E 8-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such-roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. E 9-~road design, rough grading construction, and draina-ge control for 1/2 rights of ways = and Stub Road c-onnections are the responsibility of the Developer. _ E 10-that the Sponsor shali prepare and submit to the County Engineer.a design proposaZ accept- able to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road inter- " - section. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must'be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Yoprovements to the State Highway are to be the respon- . sibila.ty of the Sponsor and may either b.e constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such i.mprovements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the'County _ Engineer'and the State Highway Department. Zl that d11 roads within the plat be curbed and/or paved to the snecificatiors of the CountY Engineer. Existing Cour_ty roads providi.ng ai-rect access to lots of 4he pa_at shal.l be • paved ana/or curbed to the standards of the Countv Fr.gineer. . . , _ . . . . . . . . . . - . . • • , - :J • . - ' • • • - ~~i^ 1'~'P l . 51)0~ANE VALLt(-1 FIRE DE'--?ARTPNENT ~d 619 ~ - EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPO'rCANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPNONE (509) 928-1700 Vk4 te 17allG e!~6V August 9, 1977 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, P1 anning Di rector Sookane County Planning Commission , - North 811 Jefferson Spokane,.Washington 99201 ~ ~ Dear Mr. Dayharsh: The follotiving preliminary;subdivisions and zone classification for upgrading has been reviewed for'fire protection: _ PE-1130-77 ZE- 137-77 SIMPSOy; ~ins and hydrantsr need to be installed i n thi s' a-rea PE-1131-77 ZE- 138-77 HODGES,;"I'rJ~,'Mains and hydra,nts need to be instalied i n ttiis -~area • 'R . ~ • ~ ✓ P E_1132- 77 a , ZE- 139-77 r~ SEIPP,-Mai ns and hydrants\needr-to be~i nstalled i n, thi s area PE-1052-7~6 . ZE- 131-r76,, REDL IN-Ma i ns an d, hydry,:.~.~ ants need ~to~be. Xnstal 1 ed f ~ • . ' t ~ ~ ~ ~i n th i s area : j I r w~ Q~ - . j, • . r .^.~'a,1l....^"~~e_- y~ ~ . . ,a" ~ : n+' ' . "'rt'4.4 a✓~,~~+ t ,i„ ^ ,_7 ~ rT ;s_ 5 Sln ei y ~ ~ - • I F`~'1,4 `J1 . . , • . _~..,~«~A,,: A 1 •li ook .el - Lt. of. -Inspectors ECE I ~ ~ . AU G 11 1977 SPOKANE COUNTY ~ PLANNING DEPARTPJiENY ~ ~ 1°RE YENT FIRES SA YE LI VES 0/ . C SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTN DISTRICT ci Inter-Offi ce Communi cation 4~1H O\S1 Date: August 4, 1977 T0: Spokane County Planning Commission FROM: Eugene C. Prather, R.S4~1~'4~Cp SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat - GENTRY SUBAIVISION 1. References: a. Map of subjgct, scale 1" = 50' by Simpson dated July 13, 1977. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Cp.ntral Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Re- sources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the Spokane Valley, D. K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Sttidy - Metro- pol3tan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D..A., March, 1968. e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Logs of Vera Water and Power Company and other wells in Township 25, Range 44, Sections 13 & 14. g. Field Survey Report, Dick Ellis, Spokane County Health District, April.5, 1977. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1949. 2. Topography, soils and water. a. This project lies in a relatively flat area between Opportunity and Veradale. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is losated over the Spokane Valley Aquifes. b. Surf ace soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5% slopesa They hade a septic tank filter field limitation o£ slight witb possible contaminat ion of groundwater. co Geologically the soils 'are glaciofluvial deposits; streaan-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. SCHD-ADM-118 . Gentrq Subdivision Page 2 August 4, 1977 • d. The data from a well in the area shows the well is 152 feet deep and had a static water level varying from 120 feet below the sur- face. The total nitrogen level was 2.02 ppm. The Vera Water and Power Company has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. a. The plat sponsor has proposed 10 duplex lots on 3.5 acres with a typical lot size of 90 by 130 f eet. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for secJage disposal. b. In the course of tha conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd con- sidered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phos- phate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer , above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol- ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."--- "The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved°solids concentration, indi- cate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analqsis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the raage of 2.02 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges from 2.19 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking wates standards permit up to YO ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface , Gentry Subdivision Page 2 August 4, 1977 waters wauld require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obt8in a permit for the discharge froan the Depart- ment of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. 2. Sealed systems, whether individual or communi,ty, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more land area that a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safetq hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainf ields. 4. Recommend that: a. A public water system including f ire flows serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. b. Sponsor provide evidence that the plat lies within the recorded service area of Vera Water and Power Companp. c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total af twelve (12) dwelling units are authorized within the plat. cc: Charles E. Simpson, Engineer9 Inc. North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 1 . AGEIVDA, AUGUST 19, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CONlMISSION Tlme: Friday, August 19, 1977, 9:30 A. M. Placeo (PLEASE NOTE) CountyCommissioners Assembly Room, County Court House . PREI.IMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICA'TION jJPGRADING 11. PE-1132-77, Gentry Subdfvfsion ZE- 139-77A Aqricultural to Sfngle Family Residential and/or Two Family Residential a. Location: Sectlon 14, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W. M. The East 35 feet of the North 445.3 feet of Tract 55 of Vera and the W 1/2 of Tract 56 of Vera, except the East 53 feet, also except the W 70 feet of the S 160 feet, also except the W 150 feet of the E 203 feet of the S 140 feet, and also except the 1V 40 feet of the S 180 feet of th e W 75 feet of the E 128 feet thereof e b. Sponsor: F. V. Seipp South 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineer: Charles E e Simpson North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 d. Stte Sfze: Approximately 3,5 acres e s Number of Lots: 10 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Duplexes g. Existing Zonfng: Agricultural, March 27, 1942 ' ho Proposed Zoning: Single Family Residential and/or Two-Family Residential f. Water Source: . Vera Power and Water j. School District: Central Valley School District k. Environmental Impact:. A topic of di scu s sion at this hearf ng ma y be whether or not thls proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. S J' % ,ORT ~ a O ~ r _ ~ . _ ( • r eooMa u RA:fW ~ u MIM'' 9 AVt, i_ r b I INTEA-4Y@TE MIWhrAY m • AV Av(. I♦ T"T ~ o Ipn t a'- ~ s ~ '`+4. c o- a vw5~~. a ? - . _ . ~ ~ i p' 1~ ~ Y 2 • .'SC-ALZ svw,wu rr ~ ~ i j -•v~A r- .u.~ ~ V$ I'L M I Le - 1 w° AvC --y Q . 1~ 4 6 _ 4T. ygrw rt,l♦ ~Z [ ♦ I, _ ncce ' { ~ 'a ' ~LtE w•,~o+ ~`N ~ . _ _Q..., `L,IKB, . QTh - 11 - r / 1 PE-1132-77 & ZE-139-77 In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of F. V. Seipp, South 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Gentry Subdivision. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Single Family Residential and/or Two-Family Residential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats, of such property. The property being platted is described as the East 35 feet of the North 445.3 feet of Tract 55 of Vera and the W 1/2 of Tract 56 of Vera, except the E 53', also except the W 70' of the S 160', also except the W 150' of the E 203' of the S 140', and also except the N 40' of the S 180' of the W 75' of the E 128' thereof loca ted in the S 1/2 of Section 14, Township 25 1V Range 44, E. W, M,, Spokane County, Washington, (North of Valley Way, approximarely 360 feet west of Sullivan Road.) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF trlASHINGTON ) ) SSo COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ui- 10 . UA-, Being first duly sviorn, deposee and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one yearso ~ That on 1~ 7-1 he PersonallY Posted three (3) true ~ and correct copies of the hereto attached P30TICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to--wit: '~Ic 1. ~ wz" , - ~ Lk zo 3. . 410k ~ Subscribed and sworn to me , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, VJASHINc~~TGN Residing at Spokane, Washington REC~~~~ Date 119.7 19--L 8092 Received From ~ Address- M.7 u2u~ MAel-~ ~ Dollars $-A0. 00 Fvr t F - 113.2 - 77 ;D AccauN~ ~OW PAIa : _ . . , . _ . An1r ol t~~+ ~ I ►~£ou1ar AMT. PAfit ~ECK gA~~CE f 1 ~ By . ~ ~ . a~~~~~ $KW6 ~ - Auqust 1977 Ceatral Yalley School D18trt ct South 123 Bowdlsh Road Spokens, VVA 99206 RE: Auguet, 1977 PlanninQ Conamleaton Hesriag Gantismen: Pleaee ceview and comment upoa the affsat that approvel of t!w onalo"d aubdivtslons, by the Planning Commtaslon, miqht haw upon yout distriCt'a faallttlsa. A heeclnQ hns been schedulid for Auyuat 19, 1977 to constder thase pcopossls. Thank you iar your conilnusd cooperetlon. Slttaerely, Robert j. Bothards Plat Adminlstrator RjB:k) Encloeurea 3 _ f - Telephone 924-380D Distributors of Wafer 8 Power - . ~ 601 NORTH EVER.r,RFEt+I VERAOAIE, WASFIINCTON 99037 July 14, 1977 Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 RE: GENTRY SUBDIVISION Dear Sir: This letter is to verify that the Vera Water & Power District can supply power and water to the above subdivision providing the developer complies with the District's policies, rules and regulations. Sincerely, , William J. obb Assistant Manager WJJ:ma #950.77 cc: Simpson Engineering ~r c ~ 1 ~ 19~1 oEP PO - P~AN~~ E X H I B I T A • PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM AREA AND DISTANCE ■ooooo000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000oooooc TUtal arnount 'of land in this Subdivision: Approximatel y 3.5 Acres Proposed density of the Plat: 10/2 Lots/Gross Acre '_C'otal amouni: of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: None Acres Proposed use of controlled adjoining land: Wtlat is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? .3/8 "cuLr Shopping facilities? Municipal Boundary: Paved street or hi-ghway? c, LAND'USE gooooo000000oooooaooooooooaooooooooooaooaooooo00000000000oooooaooooooc lndicatE the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( Duplexes ( X). Indicate lots for duplexes: qll Multi-f'amily dwelling units ( Indicate which 1ots: MoUile Homes ( Other ~ Describe-other uses: Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: None What is the pr-esent use of the property proposed to be platted? Vacant List type of uses: Cvltivated land: acres. Pasture:. x acres. Tirnber: acres. Vacant: ~acres. Other: Acres I s keeping of animals desired? No ( X). Yes ( Tg-pe: IMPROVEMWS ■ooooo000000000000000000000000oooooaooooo0oooooaooooo00000000oooooc Do you plan to t':ile the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi-phase clev- elopment? Entirety , To what level of improveriient will streets be constructed? Gravel ( X.)- Mfnimumo Curb an(i Gravel ( X). Curb and Paved ( vescribe any combinations of above: . What is the time.pe.riod expected for complete development of the Plat: ~~h,,- . Street :_mprovements completed? 1 . Substantial number of lots occupied? Is dedi,;ation of a.,ny land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( Yes ( X). Describe: Roadway :lndicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 1000 per iidinq unit Square feet Number of bedrooms . Will buildings be built on the lots be:fore they are sold: IVo ( Yes ( x). Will any special desd restrictions be included in the sale of lots7 No ( X). Yes ( If "yes", explain: UTILITIES ■oor]aooooaooooo00oooooaooooooooaoooDooaooooo0000000oooooQaooaooaooMoI Indicate the proposed method of aewage disposa].: Septic tank ( X). Lagoon ( , Treatment plAnt ( Other, or-combinations (Describe) , • • Tndxcate the proposed source of water suprly: Individual wells ( Public system ( X)• Pr:i.vate community system ( ) . ' , Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements ( X). Overhead utility easements ( Utilities in streets ( No easements ( Indicate the-di-stance from this proposal to the nearest existing water mazn: on street feet, Indicate size of nearest main: Inches. List utility compdnies or distra.cts expected to provide service to this Plat: Electricity: vera Gas: Water: V ekr Phone: 924'3800 • v . E X H I B I T A Page 2 PRELIMINARY PLAZ' APPLICATION FORM (Continued ) ACKNOWLEDGMENZ'S MOOOOOOODOOODOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOODOODOOOOO❑ PROPOSED PLAT NAME: GENTRY SUBDIUISION T, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has t,oeil pr-epared by me under my supervision in accordance wi th the requirements ot the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. ~ Eo, Date : 7 ~c~s /-7'7 ~i0s igned ) ~.~1.a~► ~ 4 ~ . : ~ V dress) jj °5c)t!> ~,~s~ ~ . Phone : ;0, 9967 ~ 9967 Cc ~ p~ ~ , Z~p : . ~ss FGIsTE~° . zo~A~. s~~to . please print I, F. V. Seipp , the sponsor of this proposed subdivision, am the (owner builder ( ) ; agent ( ) ; option holder (X ) ; contract holder ( o F-t;he Property proposed to %~e platted and have completed the information requested of ine and do tlereby te stify that it is cor•rect and accurate. , ~ . . (Signed) • U. Seip ~ Date: July 159 1977 : . .(Address) S. 717 Pines Rd Phone: 928-2592 _Spokane, Wash Zip ; 99206 1-7 "7 N OTARY Date: `S~JGvr..Ct-a~.cv -~l~r» 1/ 1 ~ NG'TAAY 3E4L : Special Comments: > } 1 ~ r`, FA - ea J e.,Y~ 9 ~ ~ ,s~w ~a i~ ~ • ~bti! ♦ • •.■ooo0OOO0oooODOOOOO■ THIS PART TO BE COMPI,ETED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~00=000000000000 PLAIVNING DEl'ARTMENT INFORMATION_ llai;e Submitted: T7 Checked by: ` i UzL.CX_j rh School District: ~-~.ut.g~2' Preliminary Plat Fee: Existing Zoning: ~ Date established: 3 u,v_ . Zone Change File No Adverti sed . Zone Upgrading : y Z-~ Number of Lots: I~ Locat:ion: Section Township Rangel~ P°lr.zt File No.: Plat Name: CLARENCE E. SIMPSON RICHARD L. SIMPSON CHARLFS E. SIAAPSON uCarence C~. Sim/1.4on engineer.4, AC. CIViI ENGINEERS AND LAIdD SURVEYORS Regittered in Wiubington and Idaho TELEPHONE 926_1322 OFFICE N. 909 ARGONNE RD., SPOKANE, WASH. 99206 . July 13, 1977 CENTRY SUBDNIS ION PRELIMINARY PLAT LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East 35 feet of the North 445.3 feet of Tract 55 of Vera and the West 1/2 of Tract 56 of Vera, except the East 53 feet, also except the West 70 feet of the South 160 feet, also except the West 150 feet of the E ast 203 feet of the South 140 feet, and also except the North 40 feet of the South 180 feet of the West 75 feet of the East.- I28 feet thereof located in the S 1/2 of Section 14, T. 25 N. , R. 44 E. W. M. , Spokane County, Washington. S~~ , wasSO Ztr ~ ~ ~ro~ ~ V ; 'J ~ 4.1 C E D E ~ O ~ CO~~ ME gpOKAN p NT EPaR~ . PLANtiING