The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1111A-77 . . , AGENDA, JU1VE 24, 197. . *;-EPHONE NO.: 456-2274 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY P NNING COMMISSION ~ T me: w Friday, june 24, 1977, 9:30 A.M. ~ P l ac e: C n f e r e n c e R oom A, County Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) Cri.ASSTFT CATTON TPCRADINC 6. PF-1111-7 7. Sylvia Court ZL- 96-77. Agricultural a. Location: Section 7, Township 2 S N., Range 44, E. W. M. The East 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 7, lyi g South of the NPRR R/W, except the Nly 15 feet and except the South 144 fee of the West 166 . 8 feet thereof. _ b. Sponsor: Wolfland, Inc. (F. V. Seipp) South 717 Pines Road pokane, WA 99206 c. Engineers : larence E. Simpson Engfneers, Inc. N rth 909 Argonne Road Sp ane, WA 99206 d. Site Size: 3.2 cres e. Number of Lots: 7 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Multi-f mily dwelling units g. Existing Zoning: Agricultu 1, established April 26, 1946 h. Proposed Zoning: Multiple F mily Suburban i. Water Source: Washington Water Power Company j. School District: , West Valley chool District _ k. Environmental Impact: A topic of dis ussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a signific t adverse environmental impact. , ~ „J. ~ I . a■.. I r ~ r I1~1 pJp ~ i V ~ t n: s r r y 0' - _ 6'- - ~i_ - - - S 49 • • 7 ' 1q \ = > I . OA'AMf - _ ~ p•y+w p,,,. r t ' = • O/y • s i !l /fM 06,~ - ~ ' • ' 1 = ~4 f i : o • 2 • ' Oai.Cx►,iG[y~ ...i~ o f1 - . S F~ g ' t i'~ • ~ a Ai -n Mul hl ~ • i Q - 'i J t►[ ' - . S r R~ ~ ~ . i v♦ iC'~' v Q d ~ Q. Z L ~ • _ ~ MMOY ~ Yt. tnI ~ i _ s -D ~ •»r;:tuy ~ /Ri ~ i ot • ~ ~ i♦ wOA C w w. •vf • - !S~►!.(/~/) d ~ r 1 / I 1 Sw+7p t ✓ ~~~~~'O/ / \ ~ ~ ■ i ~ /w 4tir► a ~ . ,t >f ~ ~ ~ `~.r _•,r~ = = ~ , • \ - 6 ~ ~O LOT AREA S'fATISTIG! `OFt: SYLVIA Ci7URT ADDIfiION FILE= 1111A: ~ 4911 /7~ ~ E4LOCK 1 A►Rf A= 1 15~96o SQ fT 1 2,66 ACR~~ ) AGCUM AREA = 115996. SO FT 4 2.66 ACRES) DIFFERENCE = 0. SQ FT GROS~ ~ENSTTY : 7 LOTSlAC'RF NET OFNSITY: 2 LOTSIACRE LARGEST LOT: 46400. SQ FT SMA LLEST LOTOO 12118. SQ F'f AYERAGE LCIT ; 19333. SQ Ffi ~ OF LOfiS : 6 ~ ~ : ~ A ~ • C M ~ ~ ~ * f.'SI ~ ~ L ~ I ' 1 r ~ , ' ~ - ~~C 1~~ I`? ►C~r ti CLARC 4NCE E. SIMPSON ENGINEERf IF 7C• Cl111L ENGINEER5 AND LAND SUR'VEYORS N. 909 Argonne Road Sp4kQne, WpShl Cl~~bn 99206 • Te~ephOf1e: 926-1322 ~ ~ M . ~ pdo 0 o aop, o ° £cax. ~ , op ~D p £oo `o'~ ~s c o ~y, c•o F~Fp ~ ~ _ ~ { 4 oPo ~y w ~,y lJ ~T f ~pi>E~.e~ aP f~88o8 ~ < o a g z " a . . . . . . Ye tif a~ ~,q4 ~ ' _ ...BA.. . f ~f.. P'P > q~ , ~g o c °oEoo o ' w ° ~ UBJECT• . o Pa8 ~Sgo °S fio°o Y'O .E , ,~r~ A o° woo q ~ o M p~o , ^pg ° 0 LJ L~1TE>• . €tiJ cek~- Sj rx ~'--5) K~ ~ - 1 f F y eJ 6, -a--a L kvL J GL ~ ~ 1~- ~ r~ ~t ~ a ~ f • ~ ~ t~al ~ i s 4~" , , 11~ e , o ~xo p e ~x ~ ~ , ° .f~ ~ ~ , F ~a ~ ~o ~ ~ « e~ t , • r O ' f , t,...• ~.,i' ~ ~ ~ 1977 MEMO TO : Board of County Commi s s ioners FROM: Jerry Neal, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney DATE: August 29, 1977 RE: PE-1111-77, ZE-96-77, Sylvia Court, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban You have asked for an opinion whether the proposed zone change from agricultural to multiple family suburban would con- stitute "spot zoning." Tize proponent, Wolfland, Inc. (F. V. Seipp) proposes to construct 32 multi-family dwelling units on 3.2 acres or a gross density of about 10 dwelling units per acre. The land iscurrently zoned agriculture which permits a gross maximum density of about five single family dwelling units per acre. (See Zoning Ordinance, Section 4.04.040 where- in a lot minimum of 7,000 square feet and 65 feet of frontage is established) The land is located near the corner of Knox and Bessie in the 5pokane Valley. Single family dwellings surround the property to the north and west. An older home with associated agricultural pursuits adjoins the land to the west. The railroad right of way adjoins the property to the north. Single family residential homes constitute a broader perimeter of the property to the west, south and east. There are no multiple family dwelling units within five or six blocks of the subject property. I would estimate that the average density of the single family residences in the broader area surrounding the subject property is three per acre. There does not appear to be any other vacant land south of the railroad tracts in the near vicinity of the subject property. The nearest multiple family dwelling units I noticed were four cluplexes located about 10 blocks away on Sargent and the multiple family units located at the Argonne and Freeway interchange. For your information I have attached a section map colored schemed to show the zoning surrounding the property in question. As you can see for several blocks to the east, west and south of the subject property, the land is zoned either agriculture, two family and single family residential. While all zones permit duplexes on a minimum of 15,000 square feet of land and 90 feet of frontage, none allow multi-family structu.res. I a ' . ' ~ • 4 ' + . w r . , Baard of Caunty Cumnissioners August 29, 1977 Page Two Spot zoning has been defined by our Supreme Court as: 'Spot zoning has come to x€tean arbitrary and un- reasonable zoning action by which a smaJ.l area is singled out af a larger area or district and specially zoned for a use classification totally dif ferent fram and inconsis- tent with the classification of surrounding land, and not in accordance with the comprehensive plan. Spot zoning is azoning for private gain designed to favor or benefit a particular individual or group and nat the welfare of the carrununity as awhole., See C. Rhyrne,' Municipal Law 5 32-3, at 825 (1957). The vice of a spat zone is itsin- evitabl.e ef ~~ct of granting a discriminatory benefit to one or a group of owners and to the detriment of their neighbors or the cQmmunity without adequate public advant- age or justificatian. Thomas v. Tawn of Bedford, 11 N.Y. 2d 428, 184 N.E.2d 285 (1962). Zoning merely for the bene- fit of one or a few, or for ' the disadvantage of some and with no substanti.al relationship to the public health, safety, general welfare o~r morals, in conflict with eitheac the comprehensive zoning plan or ordinance is arbitrary and capricious and urilawful. Eckes v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore Cy., 209 Md. 432, 121 A.2d 249 (1956.1e LU~z v. L01'tqV'1GVJ, 83 W17.2C1 566, 520 P■ C.. d 1374 (1974). See also McQuillin, Municipal Corparations 3d Ed.Rev. ~ 25.83 wherein it provides : "Althaugh nnt denounced by any hard and fast rule, aoning in a haphazard manner is not favored and, on the contrary, zoning should proceed in accordance with a c3efinite and reasanable policy. Thusf azaning ardinance or an amendment af azonin.g ordznance to permit piecemeal or haphazard zoning is -void, and so-called 'spat zoning,' where it is without areasvnable basYs, is invalid. The l.egislative intention in authorizing comprehensive zoning is reasonable unifarmi~y within d~stricts having in faet the same gex~eral characteri.stics and not the marking off, for peculiar uses or x-estrictians of small distx`icts essentially similar ta the general area in which they are situated. Accordingly, an ordinance cannot create an 'island' of more or less restx'icted use within a distxict zoned for a different use or uses, where there are no differentiating reievant factrars between the ' island' and the district. Drdinarilyr the term `spot zonir~g' ~.s used ~.v det~o~.e an arner~dment to the 1t~unic~pal zoninq law reclassifying ane or more lots or parcels of land far a use out of harmony with the classification of the surrounding areas and without regard to public welfare. While the term - • - . , 4 • 1 • Board of County Commissioners August 29, 1977 Page Three . 'spat zoning' may not necessarily be confined to small areas or lots, the cases in which the courts • have struct down rezoning ordinances as spot zoning have involved single lots or small areas. Thus, singling out of one lot or a small area for different treatment from that accorded to similar surrounding land . indistinguishable from it in character, for the economic benefit of the owner of that lot or to his economic detriment, is invalid 'spot' zoning." (Emphasis Added) Accordingly, in my view to change the zoning of the sub3ect property from agriculture to multiple family suburban would be: " . singling out of one lot or a small area for different treatment from that accorded to similar surround- ing land indistinguishable from it in character, for the economic benefit of the owner of that lot. and would be "spot zoning." To allow multiple family uses would permit a much higher density of the subject property than permitted by any surrounding property. It is further noted that the plan commission invited the proponent to resubmit a proposal for duplexes which of course would not necessitate a zone change. I hope the above will be of assistance to you. If you have any further questions in this regard please give me a call. is J.T1. R E C E I V E SEP ? 1911 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT l i NiINUTES jUl\.jE 24, 1977 PRELIiViINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZQNE CUSSIrICATiORT UPGRPDI1`JG PE-1111-77 - SYLVIA COURT: ``%CLFIAND, IRTC. - - - ~ ~ L ZE 9S 77 I~GRICULTURI~~L TG PJ~ULTIPLE FA1~JiILY ~ ~UBURB~T~ PlannLng Commfsston Recommendatione Denv, without prejudice. (Vot e was unanimoUS. ) I. FINDIiVGS: A. Knox Avenue, to the south, appears to be tnsufficient to handle the tncreased t rafftc that would be generated by this proposal. B. The compattbtlity of this proposal with that of the area appears to be suspect. C. The Planntng Commtsston for a number of years has approved _ groposals that are Iocated on the edge of a nelghUorhood, are disadvantaged, and are served ?-y adequate county roads o The Commission felt that this proposal %vas in fact located In the rriiddle of the ne ighborhood w ith inadequa te county roads. D. The Planning Commission would consider, wtthout prejudice, a proposal for duplexes for the site ln questlon. II. GENERPiL DATA: A. Location: Sectton 7, Townshin 25 N., Range 44, E.'u',' ,1V! . The Ea s t 1/2 ot rhe N~V:' 1/4 of the ISPli 1/4 of the SE 1/4 ot Section 7, lying South oi the NPRR R/Vtil, except the Nly 15 feet and except the South 144 ieet of the West 166.8 feet thereof. 8. Snonsor: YJ'tirolfland, Inc, (P. V. Setpp) South 717 Pines Road Spokane, VcTA 99206 C. Engineerse Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, ~~!'A 99206 L} . Sxte Size: 3.2 Acres E. Number of Lots: 7 F. Land use proposed by sponsor; ltt-family dwelling units G. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established April 26, 1946 H. Proposed Zoning: Tviultiple Family Suburban I. "Afater Source: Washtngton ~A"Fater Power Company J. School Dlstrtcto vVest Valley School Dtstrict K. Environmental Impact: A topic of discusston at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal wtll have a significant adverse environmental G Impact. - J FINDINGS PE-1I11A-77 - SYLVIA COURT: vjGLFI.1;ND, INC. ZE- 96A-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FATv:ILY RESIDENTIAL and/or TWO- FANiILY RESIDENTIAL . Staff ftndtngs regarding PE-1111A-77, Sylvia Court. I. GENERAL INFORIViATION: A. History Sylvla Court was originally heard by the Planning Commission, June 24, 1977. The proposal at that time calied for the subdlvlston of approxlmately 3.2 acres lnto seven (7) lots, all for multt-family dwelltngs. The proposal was denled by both the Planning Commissinn and the Board of County Commtssioners. The appllcant was also instructed to resubmlt the propo- sal to the Commisslon for cp nsideration of the possibiltty of duplexes on the slte. B. Locatlon Sylvla Court is located in the west central area of the Spokane Vatley, north of Knox Avenue and east of Vtsta Road. C. Proposal The. appltcant proposes to subdlvide approximately 3.2 acres into elght (8) lots, all for duplexes o The lots are of suffLctEnt size and frontage to meet the minimums required by the zoning ordlnance for duplexes. The proposal would create a gross denslty of about five (5) unlts per acre wtth a minimum lot stze of 12, 600 square feet. D. Relatlonship to the Comprehenstve Plan The proposal is sltuated withtn an area designated as suitable for residential development by the Comprehensive Plan. The property may be sufflclently disadvantaged to warrant duplexes ln that to the north ls located severa.l rallroad tracks and Trent Avenue, whlle to the Muth the street that would serve the property carries enough traffic to consider lt as an arterlal. -1- a , ' r• - wi y 1 r : j . . i. .°.7+A+C CRNrT• f.OUA\ NO:,~f. ' ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introcluckion; The State L'nvironmentul Policy Act of 1971 ,Cilapter 43.21%1'-", RC..'Al, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmenta] values both for their own actions and when licensing pr#vate proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significaiztl'.:, (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. Ti purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involver? rietermine whether or nci : proposal !S SL:Ch ?'1i' jn:' Please ans%%,e: t}:e fol:owing questions as cdmplctely as ycu can 1 :Vith CF1e iTII'GI'fi7aCiGi: presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in you:- opinion, even only siight impacts will result. The revfewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves wiCh the deqree of impact, asking you fcr more inform ,1- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to qovernment decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pa ecs, if nacessary. You shoulci include references to any ceports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answars you provicie. Complete answers to these questions now wili help all aqencies involved with your proposal ta undertake the required ervironmenta! review without unnecessary dolay. The following questions apply to your total prupasal, not just ta the license for vJhicr, you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even thouqh completion may not accur until sometime in the future. This will allow .a11 of the agencies which will be involved to r.omrleto tht-ir Fnvirnnmental r~-vi~v,• r.ow, wi[hout duplicating paperwork in the futu:+- . No application shall be processed until lhe cfiecklist nas beeii completed and returneci to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "ves" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" an=~vers, and in same casps, mnrP dQtailmd inforn:.3tion to aid iri a threshold determination. I NOTE: This is a standard focm being used by all staCe anci lacdl agencies in the St:j~e of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. Tf a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and con tinue on to the next ques cion . R E C E I V E MAY161Q71 ENVIRO NMENTAL CHECKLI3T FORM S P O K a N E C O U N T Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT t . BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponenc: yt tP !~D(. F4 4 I`/0 2. Address and Phona IVumber of Proponent: St-P -7 29f_CJ_S~ 3. D.3te Ciiecklist Submltted: 9. Agency Requiring Checklist: SQokane Coun[y, Wa f 5. Nama of Proposal, if Applicable: 5YLvIA C~Q difT _ ' . (IF SPACE FOR F:XPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADD[TIONAL PAGES.) b. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (lncluding but not lir,it+:,:!d to i[s size, general design elements, and other fac[ors that will gtve an accurate undPr- s ta nd ing of i t s s cope and na ture) : A. '4UbcLivislon --L..4 ~'c+ 5; e J 9; rt v ~ . ~ ► l ~ » ~ G 4 e7 S-6- cJ G't' 1 d✓'t Q~ ~C~ r~l 7. Location of Proposal (desc:-ibe the physica1 set:ing of th-~ propos::l, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacis, including any ather ijlformation needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal) : L dJ~l va e. qJ ~ G o.~ Co/'- a,e~, fo,t!_-~j ~e•~~$~ s I~ e-aJ tias.,#447 d ~ LLw 8. Estimated Date for Comple[ion of the Proposal: coF ~~rr 1°lt? 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Gevernment Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - includinq razones): S-~~ ~epor~'}.+4~~" ot Socia~ £ ~e..~~'~ ~es✓~C~S - {yw~ ~r+~x~_r~s aw~ Cav~.~~ aI »t+~s~~c Gc.r.,2rt~ss"tb °~r►q►~.e: @ S fl ck4a n e C- v c~r• 47 14 !a ~ t s i~►~ G~ 10a. Do you,or the owner ln the event you cio not own the subject land, have any plans for future addltlons, expansion, or further activity related to or con- nected wlth this proposal? If yes, explaln: lOb. Do you own or have opttons on land nearby or adjacent to thfs proposal's location? If yes, explain: nQ 11. Do you know of any plans by others lncludtng thc owner whlch may affect the nropecty covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? I f yes, explain: nqn, 12. A[tach any other application forni ttiat has been completed reganifng t1le pruposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, dcscribe [he nature of such application form: n oriP II. EAVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geolagic s tructures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? , , , , , , , , . . . , . . . , , , . v I , . . (If s~~~~ ~OR ~PLANATrON r~ INADEQvATE, PLE-ASE ATTACx ADDxTIONAL FAGES.) Yes M_-I-elbc (c) C .--nQe in topography or groune, ~ur"x ice re.iief ii- _6:u{`ns . . ~ ~ (d) The desrructfon, covering or mo3ificatiort of any uni.que g~olc,~ic ~hysical features ? . . . . . . . . , . . ~ (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of sails, either vn 4r off the site ? . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . ~ (f) Changes fn depositfon or erosion of beach sands, er changes in siltakion, deposition or erosion which m•-ay modify the channel of a river or strearn or the bed of the ocean or any hay, Inlet or l,ake ? , . . , . * , . ~ LxplaJ4at!on. 'colt C" ~ 2. air. will the proposa1 result in: (a) A1r emissions or deteriotati+on of axa,.lbiet~t air quality? . . . ~ ~ (1a) The creation of objecttonable adors? . . . , , . . . . (c) Alterakion of air movemerttr maiscure or temperatuu-e, eir afly change in clfrnate, either lacaIly or regiflnally? . ~lanalion: ~ ~ ~`t•~c _ _ ~.~,~-r~,►~ ~ _~e.~ Pi'~ 3, Warer. Wffl the praposal resu.lt in: (a) Change in currents, or khe cvurse or difacti,on of water mavements, in either marine or fresh waters? , . . ~ (h) Changes in absorpUon rates, drainage p$ttet°rYS , or the rate and arnount of susfacer water runoff? . t . . , . (c) Alterations kv the cau~se or flow of flovd waters? . . . . r - - X (d) +Change in -Che amouttt of surf-ace water in any water Uod.y r • r r . s . • a 9 • • M r a ■ ► • , . . __T ~~i D:scharge into surface waters, or fn any alteratio:-z of s4-ir#ace water quality, includfng but not limitecl to tem~erdrUCea CIisSolV~d oxy'9en or tllt'"bidity'? » . . , . .2~_ (f) Al[~ration vf khe direction or raCe of flow of grounri waters r . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . , . . , - X_ (g) k.~nnq# in khe quantity of ground waters, either throu~~ ~ direcC aciciitions or withdrawals, or throctg'h interception of aYi aquiier by VLa6s excavaiionsi • • ■ ■ • • f ` I~ . ~ (Y►) Dazerloration in ground waker quality, either through direct fnjection, or through khe seepaga 4f leac'hate, phospates, detergents, waterbome virus or ~~cterfa, or other, substances into the ground waters ? . . . . (i) Reduekton ira the amount oE water oth;enwi,se avai1ab1e for public water supplles ? . . . . . . . , . . . . ~ ~ Lxplanatfon; I c: : PILs~ r~-Orf C ~ ~ 3 (IF SPAC£ FOR EYPL4NATIOy IS INADEQUAT4_ PLEASE ATTACFf HDDITIQNAL PAGES,) Yes Maybe 1°0 4. Flora. Will the pr-c,posal resulE in: (a) Ctiange in the diversity of species, or numbers of ,3ny spec.ies af £lora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? . . , . , , . , (b) Redv,tion of the numhers of any uniqtte, rare or endangered species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introciuction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to rhe normal replenishment of existinq species? . , . . . . . . , . , , , . . , ~ (d) Reciuction in acreage of any aqrlcultural crop ~ Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversiry of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . , . , , , , , , x (b) Reduc[ion of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna ? , . . , . . , . . , , }C (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an are3, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . ~C (d) Dete:iorati,on of existing fish or wildlife habitat? Expianation: Ies Ivi,-:iybe o 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: _Mp 4~4& ~x~-C..~- ~pt S~✓~i ' ~,,-sc,-~c~s~ _A6 l? o t S~ ~ C~ l' fYes Maxbe No 7. Lirhtand G1.3r-e. Will the proposal prt,duce new lir,ht or glare Explanation: a -zF'E- 4 e„T 4bd-~ e- v GY1 r ~ rr ~ r~.~S~ T~t` '~L~~' ~ . Yes Mav~ ~io 8. Land Use, kti'ill the proposal result in che alteration of the present or planned land use of a Explanation: 6-1-t4 4 _ ~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PI.EASE 11TTaCH ADDITIUNAL PAGES,) . Yes NSovbe ivo 9. N3tura2 Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase fn the rate of use of any natural resources (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? 2< Explanation: Yes Maybe 10. Ri§k of U°set. Does the proposal involve a risk of an ^ explosion ar the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, peseicides, chemicals, or radiakion) ~ in the event of an accident or upset conditions Explana tion: Yes N4dybe No 11 . Papulation. Will the proposal aiter the lacation, distri.bution, density, or growth rate of the human popula tion of an area ? , , , . . . . . . , , . , , , , X _ Explanation: a v L49 t r7 Sc ver~ we, I :^.q_~ `1 12. Housinq. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a aemand for additional housinq ? . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: Yes Maybe i'c 13. Transportacion/Circulacion, V1ri11 the praposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicul.- r movemNnt ? . . . . . .1S (b) Effects on exiscing parking facilicies, or (iernand for new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (c) Impact upon exisfiing transportation systems? X. (d) Alterations co present patterns of circulation or movemenC- of people and/ar gaods ? . . . . . . . . . .1~ (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air trafftc? (f) Increase in trciffic hazarcls to motor vehicles, i bicyclists or pedzstrians?. . , , . . . . , . , . . .~S . 1 Explanation: ii,] . nCt'Al"l~- i t7C Y''~~5~ c e r~ e -~~P- 4t 1 o T~ -5- I (IF SPACE FOR EiPL.ANATION IS Ihl1DEQUATE, PI.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes P:Jt.~yh~ No 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered aovernmental services in any of the following arPas? (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~C (b) Police protectioii . . , , . . . . , . , , , . , (c) Schoals ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other cecreacional facili!ies ? , , . . . . . . X (e) Maintenance of public facilities, includine roads? (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . , . . . . E_px lanaCion: `r'es Mayl. a I~to 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantfal amounts of fuel or energy? ~ (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of enec-c3Y? K _ Exnlanation: Tq wi~ &-X-6tj -61r~" Se✓e-,7 d e~~ . Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a neeti for new systems, or alterations to the follvwing utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? , . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (b) Communica Cion systems ? . . . . . . , , . . . . . (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (e) Storrn water drainaqe? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . --X ~ Explanation: 'n tLg- e:xt~,-1- -,&IJ- Zre ragd al . rie cp s'e✓" 144 Yes Mtiybe No 17. Human Health. Wi11 the proposal result in the creation of any health hazacd or potential health Fazacd (excluding mental health) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explanation: 6 - - . . AV (II' cP11CE FOR DCPLlaII1ATION IS INADEt1UA'I'r, P.;:ASE NTTACH ADDITIOIVAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe Nr_: I t' ,:1:'qChtyLi -s , ~1%ill 010 prcaposal restllf iti t::~! .l;s[rL:-tion of ,-i!Zy scenic viska or view open to the piblic, ar w111 the prc-- Posal result in the creation of an aFstt:etically offensive s;tA <41en to public vicw? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Ex- l.jn.;ti'_, J-:: v?s M<iybe 19. Recreation. Will the prooosal result in an impact upon the c;tialicy ~~r c~_i<•nt;.•. -,f ~-.:stin~~ re~re~ti -..:~I ocpc:: tur:itif~,e ? . . . F.xpl anation : ~ 1 : ^ i ; 'i!, Archeoloctical/Hi~toricol. W-411 the p-;.~posal result in ar~ ~ alteration of a significant archeologici-l or 'historical 51Cr• ; StruCtVre, i_,I.)J(?ct or Luil:_:1nci . . . . . • . . . . . • . . . ~ Exalanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the perialty of perjury that the above responses are made tnuthfully and to th.e best oi my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any wlllful misrepresentatlon or willful lack o f full disclosuce on my part, Spokane County may w[thdraw any declaiation of nonsignlficance that it might lssue ln reliance upon this checkli st. i ~ Date: Proponent: (Flease Prin< or Pyc)F) Proponent: G Lp~✓~ z //C . Address: 5. 71-7 &WE-5 Phone: Person completing form: Phone: gze- 'VS Date: le -7 7 D3pt, or Office of County Reviewing Ch-~c}:lis! : Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: ~17J11 - -7 ~ - ^ i PE-1111A-77 - SYLVIA COU'RT (Continuec') II. SPECIAL INFGRMATIQN: A . Circulation The Engineer's Uffice has reviewed the prc posal anci their office finds that atdequate county roaus are availEb1E to serve the proposal anr that the plat design is acceptahle to their office . B. Sewage Disposal The site has been approved for the ase of on••site sewage disposal systems to serve the proposal by the Health 11 strict. The proPosal it approveci for duplexes would require the cre-ition of a sewage managerrient sys te that wo,11 6 have ta be anpr :)ved by the Health DisErict. The proposal is also situated over thu*~ Spo'cane Valley Aquifer. The Health District believes that the L se of on-site syste -)s for this - proposal woulu have a negligtl: le im,r.edtate impact upon the grounc water quality, but contiamted urbanization in the area can be expected to have at least a no derate impact upon ground water quality. C . WatEr supply The Washington V'ater Power Co rpany has stated thttt it has the ability to serve this proposal wi4tn both do7:estic and fire flows . D. Fire Protection Fire D strict No.l has reauested that mains and hydrant;4 ofa . suffic~ent size to handle fire protection needs be install.'id. E. Schools The school is situated within the boundaries of the Vt"Est Va lley School DI strict. The district does not anticipate any partic; ilar problems in providing service to this proposal F. Par:~ s A par~,;, the Knox "Tot Lot", is situateci to the east of thiS propc sal. This par-~. is of insufficiEnt size to handle the nEecls of the neigt. - borhood. The County Par s Depart.-tient has no prESent plan for any other site acvuisition in the area at this time. -`lA - ~ ~ F • PE-1111A-77 - SYLVIA CGUk'T (Continuca) III. ENVIROI` MENTAL REVTEV't- The s ta ff of the r'lanning Depa rtrnEnt ha s reviewe~ the checklist a s s ub- ;r.itted by the appticant and thE Stafltl recommenGS that a declaration of Non-Significance be isstiec'. IV. CONDITIC%TTS: I:E approval is graniet', the Staff recoinmen :.s the following conditions. Specific conditions applicable to thls plat are referenced below and found in the attaehed suppleunent Entitle~, "Stanclarcl Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats - August, 1~ 77, " NOTE: Any a-nennm.ents to said conc?itions are letated sEparately and listed below P-10 P-2, ~'-<<, P-~., P-;;, P-r", P-'1 (Noveimber 1,1378), P-1: E-l, E-2, E-; , E-41 E-51 E-r, A-1, H-1, H-5, H-6. Upgrade Sylvia Court to thE R-1 and/or R-2 Zone Cl.assification upon the filing of thE final plat. That all raads within t-he plat be ctirbed an(-*,/or paved to the specifications of the County Engineere Existing Couty roacs proviciing direct access to lots of the plat snall be paved and/or curbed to staneards of the County Engineer o LTpon ' al piat upgrade SXJy,a,z~~ - Vor R-2J (SingY.e Family and/or Two-Fafrily s1u Ia Zone Classificatione That a statement be placed tn the dedciatlon prohlbEtLng indlvidual lot access to Knox A venue . . , . - 1 B- r ' 3~7 w~ O I ~ , No. ~ ~ I~ i , BOARD OF CDUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PROPOSAL, PE-11I1-77 I SYLVIA COURT: WOLFLAND, AND ZE-96-77, AGRICULTURAL TO 1VIULTIPLE FAMILY ~ ' SUBURBAN . WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commtss ton dtd, after publdc ' hearing on june 24, 1977, forward to the Board of County Commtsstoners a recom- mendation that the reltminar lat to be known as 'a P Y P Sylvl Court (File Number PE-1111-77) and Zone C1assificatlon Upgradtng from Agricultural to Multtple Family (File Number ZE-96-77, by denied and WHEREAS, F. V. Seipp, did by letter dated Tuly S, 1977, request a special hearing before the Board of County Commtssioners to present ev[-Jence and testi- mony against the recommendatlon of the Planntng Commission to deny the above described prellminary plat and zone change upgrading, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commisstoners dtd hold a public hearing on August 11, 1977 to consider the recommendattons of the Planning Commission and testtmony and request of the applfcanfi, objectors, and other lnterested paties, and, WHEREAS, at said hearing opportuntty was afforded those opposing the above described preliminary plat proposal and zone change upgrading, the Board of County Commisstoners of Spokane County havtng fully considered the testimony gtven, the records and minutes of the Planning CommEsston, the envtronmental assessment, and all other evidence presented and having personally acquainted themselves with the site and victnity in question, does hereby flnd that the con- clustons of the Planning Commission were generally valid and suffictent, and that approval of thts request would constitute spot zoning, NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissloners does conclude that the preliminary plat to be known as Sylvla Court and zone classification upgrading to the Multlple Famtly Suburban Zone should be and hereby is denled. DATED THIS ~ DAY OF 1977. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST: lERRY C. KOPET, CNM. VERNO W . OHLAND HARRY • tAR cier the Bo RAY W. CHRISTENSEN B y : D~pu t y C~ f - . 78 1433 - 1 ~ ~ ~ BEFVRE rL17E BQAR1J OF CIJViKTI COMMIrJS.l.OlY~~ ~~OKANE VO1dNTYi WkSHIlYL7lTONo ~ ~~~~~G MAP FROM i~~~~~~~~L TD 7~WV rAMILY R E S 0 L V T 1 0 1~ ~EIDi~~~~~ PROi E~~ LOW= IN • I 44o E# -Mi ~ SPO'~~~ COUNTYR ~~Sli~~GTON ~ I ~ mhe above-entitled matter caming on regularly for hearing before the Bvard of Caunty Cornmissioners af Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Cammission has gs.ven due notYce of the hearing I, an the ma.tter in the manner a.nc3 for the time provided by law; that saa.d Planning Camrnissi.on has held a public hearing as reouired; and that the said Planning Commission concurs I i n the plan to zone the fallowing described property as: ~ ~ ~~~~~~L ,All t~at ~ylw~~ ~~~Addtt~~~ Icioata~ ~a ftetton 70 '~ow.~~~~~ ~S N ~ ~4ir E #W, Spokans Cowity. ~a th'~~~ori. ~ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above-descrihed prcperty be, and the same hereby i6 zoned under the classification r~ ~~O FAWL~,' ~~~~~~~AL as defined in the Zana.ng Ordinance of Spakane County, adopted August 25e 19539 as amerided d PASSED $Y THE BOARD THIS DAY OF 119,0 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSI~~~ OF SPOKANE CDUNR'Y, WASHINGTON ~ND o By: ty HA~~~ M. LARNED, CNM. fihi.s is to certa.fy that this is a %rig ` , true and correct copy ❑f JERRY C. KOPET I, Resoluti an Noe passed b Board thxs 3o ...-.....b. • . day of ! 1 . By. Deputy I hereby certify that I have st~d the abave changes and revisions on the Zoning Map in the Buildirag Codes Department, and da further certify that the zone classification change a.s the sarne as described above and shvwm on the attached map4 SICNED: DATED : ' ~ , , 7 125 0 NOo BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTONo PE-i 111A-77 } IN TNE NIATTER OF FILING THE FINAL PLAT ) OF SYLVIA COURT LOCATED IN SECTION 7, ) TOW~JSNIP 25 NflRTH, RANGE 44 E.W.I~. , ~ R E S 0 L U T I 0 N , SPOKANE COUNTY y WASNINGTOPi ) ) ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the final plat of SYLVIA COURT The C 1/2 of the tIW 1/4 af the MW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Secti on 7-25-44 E.W.M., lying S of the Northern Pacific Railroad R/W, EXCEPT the Nly 15 feet and EXCEPT the S 164 feet of the W 166.80 feet, and EXCEPT Knax Avenue. more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way ded_cated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a sep- arate resolution of the Board of County Commissionerso PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS ~ DAY OF 2t4 "m/V , 19 7~ 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SFOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTOiV o • ,CH~. RaY w. GHRI T NSFtu JERRY C. KOPET ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND Cler f the Board ~ ay. . d d i i' ~ ~ I _ f A 1VTINUTES OF THE PLANNING COtv NISSION HEARING CF OCTOBFR 14, 1977 V1rHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission dtd hold a publtc meeting on October 14, 1977 to constder the testlmony and requests of several applicants, objectors, and other interested partles concerntng the below referenqed subdivtsions, zone classtftcatton upgradtngs, extenslons of ttme, and other ltems of business, and Vi%HEREAS, at said hearing opportuntty was afforded those favoring and those opposing all items of bustness, and WHEREAS, Nir. McCoury, Nsrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, and the Nlessrs, Kennedy 1V.faln, and Thomas were in attendance and constltuted a quorum, and tiVHEREAS, the Spokane County Planntng Commission fully consldered the testi- mony glven, the environmental review, and all other evldence presented, recommends to the Board of County Commisstoners the following: I. PE-1111A-77, SYLVIA CQURT: WCLFLAND, INC., ancl ZE- 96A-77, AGRICUTURAL TOSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL and/or TWO- FAIVNILY RESIDEN- ' TIAL: Due to the lack of a quorum vote on the the appltcatlon, this ltem was sent to the Board with 1Vo Recommendation. (Notion by n'ain, lost for a second. Motton by Thomas, seconded by Iviatn. Vote 3 to 2.) 2. PN-1133-77, WEATHERVANE TERRACE FIRST ADDITION: GOCKLEY, and ZN- 144-77, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary subdiviston to be known as V4reathervane Terrace First Addltlon (File Number PN-1133-77) be approved subject,to the conditlons as contalned in the Planning Staff's findings, dated October 14, 1977, and that a zone classlftcatlon upgrade be approved tothb-Agrfm-ltura! Suburhan Zone Clastih- • ftcatfon (Ftle Number 7N-144-77) upon the ftling of the ftnal pla t, and that a proposed declaratlon of IVon-Stgnlflcance be issued. ( IViotion by Mrs. Byrne, seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was unantmous.) 3. PE- l I39-77, KARLE'S FIRST ADDITION: CROSSY, and ZE- 159-77, AGRICUL- TURAL SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FAN'ILY RESIDENTLAL and/or TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary subdtv[sion to be known as Kar1E's First Addltion (File NumberP'E-1139-77) be approved subject to the condittons as contttlned in the Planning Staff's flndings, dated October 14, 1977, and that a zone classlficatton upgrade be approved to the Stngle Family Residen- tial Zone Classificatlon (Flie Number ZE-159-77) upon the flling of the final , plat, and that a proposed rleclaratlon of Non-Signiflcance be lssued. (Motlon by IVrs. Rawlings, seconded by Nrs. Byrne. Vote was unantmous.) 4. PE-1140-77, PINES WEST: HODGES, INC., and ZE-160-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAI\/:ILY RESIDENTLAL and/or TWO-FANILY RESIDENTIAL: That the applicatlon be continued to the November, 1977 Planning Commission hearing.(Mrs . Byrne moved, Nsrs. Rawl ing s seconded. Vote wa s una nimou s.) - 1 - i ~ 1 ` - . 78 o~tso BOARD OF COUTVTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDINC PRELIMII\A RY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE RECLASSI- FICATIOTV: PE-1111A-77, SYLVIA COURT; ZE-96A-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL and/or TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: SEIPP. WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did, after public hearing on October 14, 1977, forward to the Board of County Commtsstoners no recommendation concerning the preliminary plat to be known as Sylvia Court (Flle Number PE-1111A-77) and Zone Reclassification to Stngle Family Restdential and/or Two Family Restdenttal (File Number ZE- 96A-77), and WHEREAS, F. V. Seipp, did by letter dated October 17, 1977, requrest a special hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evfdence and testlmony concerning the recommendatfon of the Planning Commission that netther approved or denied the above described prelfminary plat and zone change reclassfflcation, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners dfd hold a public hearing on December 8, 1977 to consider the actfon of the Planning Commission and testimony and request of the applicant, objectors, and other interested parties, and, WHEREAS, at said hearfng opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above described prelfminary plat proposal and zone change upgrading, the Board of County Commf ss ioners of Spokane County having fully oo ns idered the testfmony given, the records and minutes of the Planning Commfssion, the envirorimen- tal assessment, and all other evidence presented and having personally acquainted themselves with the sfte and vicinity in question, does hereby flnd that 1) The site would be appropriate for duplexes in that it ts situated south of several raflroad tracks, Trent Avenue and several commercial uses as well as lying north of a street that carries arterial trafffc. 2) The number of lots within thf s proposal should be reduced to six (6) from eight (8) so as to mitigate any possible environmental hazards. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the prelimfnary plat to be known as Sylvla Court (File Number PE-1111A-77) and zone reclassification to Two Family Residentlal (Flle Number ZE-96A-77) should be and - 1 - , ~ hereby is approved, subject to the conditfons as contatned ln the Planning Staff's findings dated October 14, 1977, except that condttio rs P-1 f s hereby deleted and the following condition Is added: That the Sponsor redesxgn the plat so as to decrease the number of lots to no more than six. Said design to be accomplished to the satisfaction of the County Engineerp Planning Department and Health District. DATE D THI S vS ~ DAY O F 1978. BO RD OF OO UN W COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, VITASHINGTON lERRY C. KOPET, , , RAY W. CHRISTENSEN > A'TTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk of the Board Dep y BY: -4~~ - 2 - w 20NE CHANGES POSTED ON "NING MAPS Application No. Zp:~!VA-.71? Res. No.~- 4W-Res. Date__A-t~-qff ~ From: To: Posted By: Date Posted: Acres: Sec. Two.Range EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' C) (C, (Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' G~ (Wall Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000' ~ (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' LO K~ (File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' 14 (File Map) Metro 411 (Director's Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' /vA (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile /M (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST (Wa11 Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' (VVall Map) Front Office Scale: 1' - 1000' (W311 Map) Middle rJffice Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 400' (Fi1P Map) Tracing #34 (Soi-*h East Zoning Maps) Scale: 1000" ~ T(FiIe Map) Metrc i~11 (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' (Fite Map) County-Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Cards) Middle Office ~I ~ ~A1Fi{~ , L QS C 9 ♦ ~ ~ ~ . First American Title Company of Spokarw MAIN OFFICE ESCROW OFFICE 4Vest 704 Farst Auenue North 8611 Divasion • Suite B Spokane, Washrngton 99204 Order No. 18215 Spokane, Washcngton 99208 Phot:e: (509) 456-0550 ccs : County Planning Phone. (509) 484-1600 Spokane Co. Engineers Clarence Simpson ~ FOURTH AMENDED PLAT CERTIFICATE TO: tVolfland, Inc. S. 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA Attn : Vi-nce Seipp Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of June 30, 1978 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: The East half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 44, E. W.M. lying South of the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way, Except the Northerly 15 feet and Except the South 164 feet of the West 166.80 feet And Except Knox Avenue. This comp any certifies that record title is vested in WOLFLAND, INC., AWASHINGTON CORPORATION, free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, except as follows: 1. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said property, if unpaid. 2. PIPE LINE EASEMENT: Grantee: Spokane vatural Gas Company, a corporation Purpose: Installing, maintaining, repairing and removing a gas distribution line and appurtenances thereto Recorded: January 2, 1958 Auditor's File No.: 507374B Affects : The East 25 feet R E C E I V E fL J% JUL 17 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT *CONTINUED* ~ Affrliated wtth Ftrst American Title Insurance Company ♦ Page 2 No. 18215 NOTES: 1. TAXES PAID: General taxes for 1978 in the amount of $71.20 are paid in full. Tax Account No.: 07544-9026 This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. FIRST .4,MERICAN TITLE INSUR.ANCE COMPANY ~ ~ - - - ! Title 'Of f icer Larry D. Dunston LD/sb . RECEIPT -Date r -19 7,V 0621 ~ Received From , AdPss ~ ~ ~Dol(ars ~ F - ,accouraT How CID ' AMT OF CASH I ZKK~vE COU;aTY PL-A;r.VTIjC I~FP~t~I'ir"EiVT accour,r AM1 PA10 CHECK I' 7g l &Al4NCE I MONEY dUE - __L{JRDER Q ~ V Y s. L::L'~T6 Aea~~~~~n 1. 1~~, ~ 5~..~ ,•r,-0-,.~ ~ w P~~//i//-~- FINAL PLAT CHECK LIST 8' 1 . Final Plat Leroyed 2. Subdlvlsion nairle A< 3. Section, township & ranye O~ 4. Sponsor(s) ►lame (s) 5. Erlgineer or surveyor OK 6. Sheet size 24" X 36" 4K 7. North point, scale (100' - 1" or 2 00' - 1O K 8. Boundary Llne 6) K 9. Location & widths of proposed streets, alleys, rights in ~ K 9- i~ of way, easements, parks, open spaces,& proper labeling of spaces to be dedicated to the public 10. Layout & names of adjoining subdivisions OK a. Replats - Layout & Name of the replat shall be shown by dashed lines 11. Street names - consistent with existing streets in city and county. Check aqainst name s on K, round name wheel. ~ 12. Lot sizes -i.e. , 80' X 125' with 10, 000 sq. ft. for single family lot Cul De Sacs - 80' at building line 1J. Layout, nurribers, and dimensions of lots & parcels 14. Necessary engineering data 15. Does dedication state if individual water and/or 2 public sewers will be provided in accordance . with preliminary plat of approval. <016Notarized certification by a professional land surveyor. CK 17. Private re strictions , if any 18. Number and type of units oi< 19. Dedication of streets to the public D K ~ 20 e Easement verification & illustration Q o/~ 21. Check easements, clouds on property, etc from Title Report d~ ~J ~ p ~~L'Q GZ". 0 ~ q, C1)(2uJ d~ nz uDa--t,,-, ,Q.2o..x,.. C&O&A, - QAffx.c - ) . . i' 6tZ- R-r N 6,~ . ~ yIa WeX&.4 -J,~.tr--, Let, C~ .~44.1 ~ (~i ~ c~a,-~t a~ti • ~ O ~ ~ ~~`'-'"~C ~z cr'''' ~ l ~ ~ ~il'►'~ C~~'"' "7-Art` O ~ t., % ~ Pacific Northwest Bell Spokane, September 14, 1978 Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Sirs: The Utility easements shown on the Vina plat of Sylvia Court are satisfactory to the Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company. G. D. Fleming Right-of-Way Agent North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, tiVashington 99202 GDF:nf cc: Robert J. Bethards ~ wwp 3115 REV B 73 ~Yi _ ' _ i = ~ ,a~~~ - THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY ' - - Electric and 1Vatural Gas Service lillip P 0 BOX 3121 • SPOKAN E, WASHINGTON 99220 o(509) 459 0500 31 September 12, 1978 Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Attn: Mr. Wally Hubbard: Dear Nir. . Hubbard : The utility easements as shown on the final Plat of Sylvia Court Addition are satisfactory, with The Washington Water Power Company. Sincerely, huc Whittaker Home Builder Representative Spokane Division Marketing CW:c R E C E I V E SEP 111 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT S E R V 1 N G T H E I N l A N D E M P I R E 0 f W A S H 1 N G T 0 N A N D I D A M 0 ~S C9 ~ '1-- * ~ First American Title Company o f Spokarw MAIN OFFICE ESCROW OFFICE iVest 704 First Avenue North 8611 Dcutsion • Sucte B Spokane, Washington 99204 Order No. 18215 Spokane, Washangton 99208 Phon.e: (509) 456-0550 ccs : County Engineer' s Phone: (509) 484-1600 Spokane Co. Planning Clarence Simpson SECONDED AMENDED PLAT CERTIFICATE TO : Wolf land, Inc. R E C E I V E S. 717 Pines Road Spokane, washington J U L 1 Z 1Q-78 ' Attn: Vince Seipp SPOKANE COUNTY Gentlemen: PLANNlNG DEPARTMENT This is a certificate as of June 30, 1978 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: That protion of the East 20 rods of the West 40 rods of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 44 East of the Wlllamette Meridian, in the County of Spokane and State of Washington, lying North of Knox Avenue and Southerly of a line drawn parallel to and 15 feet Southerly as measured at right angles to the Souther- ly line of the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way, SAVINGS AND EXCEPTING from the hereabove, the South 144 feet of the West 166.8 feet of that portion of the East 20 rods of the West 40 rods of the Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 44 East of the Williamette Meridian, in the County of Spokane and State of Washington, lying North of Knox Avenue and Southerly of a line drawn parallel to and 15 feet Southerly as measured at righ t angles to the Southerly line of the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way. This company certifies that record title is vested in WOLFLAND, INC., A WASHINGTON CORPORATION, free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, except as follows: 1. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale of said property, if unpaid. 2. PIPE LINE EASEMENT: Grantee: Spokane Natural Gas Company, a corporation Pu.upose: installing, maintaining, repairing and removing a gas distribution line and appurtenances thereto Recorded: January 2, 1958 Auditor's File No. : 507374B to-E I/ I f pt Affects: The East 25 feet *CONTINUED* Affiliated with First America►i Tctle Insurance Comparty Page 2 No. 18215 NOTES: 1. TAXES PAID: General taxes for 1978 in the amount of $71.20 are paid in full. Tax Account No.: 07544-9026 This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~ / Title Zxaminer Fred Trochimowicz FT/sb oRdER No. LOAN NO. MORTGAGOR PLAT MAP Vo1 pG . 1 ~ + I ~ , ~ , ` •rM ~ 3) ' ' , ~ ~ . /1 ~ r ~ 1 / ~ • . ~ + t'` ( ~ , ~ • ~~~'.f 't~. / ~i ..~~r 'rr • . ~ ~ . .11'.~ ~ . . , . ~ ~~tate! !•w►•~i • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; 17 , ,,~kr n• ~f..~ i fr ~ - , T.7 (,:i7~iyli:t/1:~ ~ ~ , ~ /`~E/VL/~✓E.J ,~~~i'~;~EL•;~ ' 1 4i`l J PJ ; D/7"l:;~r ~ DrA 4 ~ l! A v ' ~ , r ~ ~ s.~ _~+c0 idrp srr - r ~ ua sis ~ nro crs wi►-a ~•v~ ~ ~s,~..~ i ~rr 'a r' ` y~ ~ rr , . . ..nr~~ ~r ~!'",~I ~ • ` - ~ ~ ~ ~I/ f 7' • / ~J ' 'f ~ : ~ ~ - . ~ ^ ••NI ► ' / ~ ' r ~'T_'- v r ~ . ~ ~ • ~ • f , e r 7 % - < < I _ T .:i:.:~ ~ ~_3..~,~ ~ y 1 +y.u-'erl~rors-as'esfr'~~~L ~~-~ar ~[~SI ~r s4+ rt+ t~ ao ss'` ~ • x i~~•. .,,,3.~•~ ?'_~1,~~~ - ~ ' , , I " , t ' , • ~ ` ~ • j'. y~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ 017ri, X rs~~sr s!Q,/ zt ~~Vo ~ d .vo. ~ ' • ~ U~' ~ ~ ~ 7~rr r• \w.~ w~.~. . n . . rr~ ww r.►. ~'r ~ ~ ii__'Q'.~ T.D~" ~iiiT~'fif~~.i~ i~~ a'i~ YQ 1~r'Yii' ~ i►J~ C~ b'VO 1. i l,. ~ t "•r ~ 4 2, ~ . ~ . ~ X0 . ~ ~ ~ P, ~ ~ y . ~ ~ .a... ~ o~- ~ ~d ' ~ ~ • I' I / ~ I 1 ♦ I • • ~ . , ~ i~.. a.~ s~~+ .~.~w ~o ^ro . ~►,s ~ wnw . 'a~Y... , _e~►.~ ~ ~ r 7- ~ . n N V. . . ~ ~r ~ t ~ 'Ir; ~ j 9 ~ q,1~1-j 1 ••t . 7~"' 'i i r. ~ 3/'~~~~ ~Ir r, T1 61 ~ ~ . j ( , , ~ ~ . .7'~ ` _ _ ~ ~ . ...~.~a._.~a.:~.~ .a r~0 i ff~ w.~! ~r~~ ! + ~~i1 ~ ' • ` ~~~'~r~. fL%Q ~:q ~.~4.~.~~~p~~~~.a~ llw~.1."w~Ji~.~. ~..u~~' .~~~rl~'p1 This m-,p does not pu►port io show alf highways, roads or easemcnt; affecting said property; no l:ability is ossumed for v3r-iations in dimensions and locatien. ~ ~ A A1 I !i / C . f ~-NW;K ~ ~ First American Title Company of Spokane . e . AIA IN OFFICF. ESCROW O FFICE Ii%e.st 704 Ftrst Auenue North 8611 Dcucscon • Sucte B Spokatie, 6Vashcngtori 99204 No. 18 215 Spokane, Washcngton 99208 Phone (509) 456-0550 ccs : County Engineers r Phone. (509) 484-1600 County Planning, Clarence Simpson ' PLAT CERTIFICATE , T0: Wolfland, Inc. . S. 717 Pines Road ' Spokane, Washington Attn: Vince Seipp ~ . Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of March 6, 1978 at 8:00 a.m. for a .plat of the following property: That portion of the East 20 rods of the West 40 rods of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quarter of Section 7, Township 25 North, Range 44 East of 'the Willamette Meridian, in the County uf Spokane and State of Washington, lying North of Knox Avenue and Southerly of a line drawn parallel to and 15 feet Southerly as measured at right angles to the Southerly line of the Northern PacifiRailroad right of way, SAVINGS AND EXCEPTING from the hereabcve, The South 144 feet of . the West 166.8 feet of that portion of the East 20 rods of the , West 40 rods of the Northwest quarter of the Southeast quart~r of Section 7, Township 25 Ivorth, Range 44 East of the Williarnette Meridian, in the County of Spokane and State of Washington, lying North of Knox Avenue and Southerly of a line drawn parallel to and 15 feet Southerly as measured at right angels to the Southerly line of the rJorthern Pacific Railroad right of way. This company certifies that record title is vested in WILLIS Mc- KITTRICK, WHOSE WIFE IS PATRICIA McKIiTRICK, PRESUMPTIVELY AS COMMUNITY PROPERTY., free form all liens, encumbrances and ohjections, except as follows: l. Lien of any real estate excise sales tax upon any sale o".. said . property, if unFaid. - 2. GENERAL TAXES: R E . C E I 'V E Year: 1978 Amount : $71.20 ' MAR $1978 ' Tax Account No.: 07544-9026 . SPOKA'NE COUN i Y ' *CONTINtTED* PLANNING DEPARTMENT Affiliated uzth First Amencan T,tle Insurance Cvmpany , . ~ No. 18215 page 2 • Plat Certificate r . 3. PIPE LINE EASEMENT: . Grantee: Spokane Natural Gas Company, a corporation Purpose:- installing, maintaining, repairing and removing a, gas distribution line and appurtenances thereto Recorded: January 2, 1958 . Auditor's File No.: 507374B Affects: The East 25 feet ~ . . NOTES: This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. TRS 4 EFICAN TITLE INSUR.ANCE COMPANY As .stant Secretary L y D. Dunston , . LD/dm , . , , . ~ ~ nRi)ER N0. , LOAN NO. . ~ / MORTGAGOR . , PLAT MAP Vol PG . : , ~ ~ `J ~ ^ - i - i S~ A_ ~ , ~ r . ~ ~.l r~ << I , i 11 ~ ~ + • i , --''~r . ~ ~ ~ r{ • ' . ~ 010 t. , ~ r_ / ~''~f . ~ . ~ • , • ~ , ~ ~ . ~ r ~I • . ' S IS~jO 1• 6! .i . ' ~ J=) 4' , ; -`~f • ~ :s ~ ,r , j . , , 91 4. , tjr~tf`1-, . ' ~ ; 1 l' . ~7/yt />z ff ~ ~i~i'~`l_l ' J ~~Lr/V ~/IYG.w1 ~,I/~~~.~ • , ' • ~ • , !1 ~ L-~. A:- r ? ~ ' , ' , J4 ~ b ~ ~ 1 ~ I! 7 ~ ~ ~ ! , ' ;re~ .a,~i t~'_st h~ e~ as arw. ~wta► rws n+.ne► ~M~41• •il: f s ~ ~ • • r ~ ~ . i . ~ "'1~ - ~ w • _ - . r _ ~ 1 J. a1~ ~ ~t ~ ~ _ y,~ ~ _ f' sw _ aa~r •-00'0 .107- ~ ~ t~r 4w ri 6~m+no sr v ~ • ~ ' . ~ f • A 1 ~ , ~ I ' . , , ti ~ ~ ~ • ~ r . - ~ I~I'n1 Htf~"~~ ~..1/R "K'~ isli ~ • _ I `7`J~ 11 / t T• ! ( / ~ ~ Il ` ~ iL, " 1 F ; . v~ . . ! ~ ' . . , ~ r ~ ~ i'~ f • ' 9 .7 . ~ • : ; ~ r~+. ....l~. ~ ~Z~ 1~~' LJ .r•.}-~ -1' l." .•....I.....r ~ ~ . . , _ i~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~`~~,~=J ~;t s 1 /NrC/~/~~1 1 ~ f'.9, i ~r `11~ x~~•+~, . ;i , 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F I Z ~S' 'T /•L ~ f~ .i'~ l.n ' ~ ~ ~ 2N17 ! D C ~ ~ , i ♦ j. 1 ~ ~ ~,q. ~ *v ]~i ~ w ••r •4~ !0 ~11~~C^~f @! ~.7I ~r T~iI" Za it'r t.St~ ~ Ccst ~i~ iYYf 1~l1 ~yV ! ~i.~ rd^~ i1~ t.e~ ry j' ~ G~ ~ 'm fq ' r -J ~ ~I V . ~ ~ t ~?!b~_. ; • - ti~t I ~ p S ~ ~ i'~ • ~ww. • c~! q t r~ r~ . y• r'iR ~V ~ • 4 ~ jr~. Mf s~- ~~-w Ov^ ~1„' . • I . Y . 'r ` ~ ~ • i Y k i ~ \ ~1 Y' j~ ~ , 4 ► , ° _ ri ~'7- 1 l , t,~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ! ~ y _ - . ~~l i ~ , ~ -T cw r , I : •r + ~ 5~ ~ . I • ~ I, I ' ~ ' J, ~'p , ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ } ~ , ♦ r • ~ ' yC ~ ~f w.~ • . ~ ' ~ , ci ~~'f `I ~ ~ ^ i r( ~ ~T' ' i''. ip,:Ji . ~Cl~'. 1 ~ I ✓ T ~ ~ • ~ ~ 7 4 ( 1 ~ ~ 3 n• i u~ r _ vza~ tr. ~rv~ l~ ~ .-~n•aV vJ ~4• ~ 1«• ~•1 ~~r•~' f~':lt.~Ca~ ~ $.-~«f7 . _ ~;1 4i' j~ • ~fO»~.1~ r M-'~ -~-1 . j I _ ~ . . ' ♦ . \1 • ' ♦ . ~ ~ ' ~ 1 ' , » ~ 1~ ~i . . This mac does not pWport '_o show all highways, roads or e3stimencs affectirR said propeTty; no liability :s ~ssurned for varistiens in damFnsions ar.d loc3ticn. ~ . Q BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION, ) 1A-77, SYLUTA COURT, ZE-96A-77, ) COMMISSIONERS' DECISION AGR CULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ) AND/OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - WOLFLAND, ) INC. (F. V. SEIPP) } This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, to render its decision concerning the request of,Wolfland, Inc. (F. V. Seipp), South 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington, for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading; and The Board having received no recommendation from the Spokane County Planning Commission as stated in the minutes of the Commission, dated October, 1977; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on December 8, 1977, at the request of the sponsor, Wolfland, Inc. and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to approve the preliminary plat; PROUIDED, that the plat be limited to six (6) iots rather than the eight (8) requested and; PROVIDED, further that the sponsor submit a site development plan to the Planning Staff for approval. The Board also concurred in the Planning Staff's recommendation that no significant adverse impacts will result and a Declaration of Non Significance be issued. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for . execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter,and setting forth specific conditions of approval. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 22nd day of December, 1977. VERNON W. OHLAND CLERK OF THE BOARD / BY: R anne Montague, Deputy Cle~r ti ~ A , Cco-UIN. DEPT. FILE REF. - :r ,.i ,~,`~a:._ I G T a • ~ f %4~~ - . l.~6 - ' STAFF REVIEW 4F ENVIRONMENTAL CIIECKLIST T. In accordance with the SpokanA County Environmental Ordinance and WaC 197-10, :-in Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by th e 4-L ~~'_31.K The following data briefly describes the proDoszl: A. Action Requested: Zb ~ R. Description of Proposal: S~ IUtSt~ . ~ C. Loca tion of ProPo s a l: &escc P IT . Review of C-'ieCklis t: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted undFr the follo-winc questions: l• 2 ' I I!~-~ I ~ (Over) B. Potenrially significant aciverse impacts are noted under the following questions: C. Discussionof impacts identiYied above: III. Conclusions and Recomrr,endations: Based on II A, B and C above, the staff C.,Ot4j"AC4 41AIL Z, ~ ~ . Sp.oliLnae, Washirigt4in October 12, 1977 T o t he Spokane C ouxty PUnAing Cormis=ipx: • We the underxignQd property owxess osL Kn9a~ ~trsgt- taetxeeA V~Lsta and Besm3.e otxestaj d9 A9t- waxt tke proposed Sylvia Court Fermit authgxs.tied by the Spokam P7.aning Commi~siom For the f017.owixg rea 1, You have a petition by 91 ~sidexto ivk the uzea and adjoin- ixg tne project- amk3.ng that it be rezoMed tb sing].e: family re side Mce at. 2'. Thmt j.mcluded ita the plane are the ealarglxg or v3.deniag of Kyn= atsvet which xe do not want be.cauae this eitcourAge,r more aid faster traffic dowa Keox. We feel that the atreet as fa- ia aciequate sts it 3s tnow. 3. The eftviroamatal impact on tha area would place reffiidential homes in a aacoxd pl.ace priority- and devaluate our homss amd their desirability aa such. NWw: Addrema : ~ . X<v-e_ . Q\~ - - a - 9 z F ! r ` ~ ~ • ~ . 1~'_ ' i ~ . i r ~ ~ F,; hPF'll; ,?'~sr,i.l. ARY" Yi.ts'1'S ;;►i~~..L L'r:T`.' t'IAN ivIDEPARTN!EN'!' X SF`~f:.AN.f' C1-111'•1TX f'IxIIN:NV';:' I . E'irSt1n111c7 C:>MI?117: i=-A1: (P_ 1) 1} t~:t' _ ._i . . . . ~ .1~. . ~i• i. i ~.:1.'-. ~ 1Ci1_. _1 ~.~1L-..i_~i .r (P-?~ That a~;~..'.:t~:Ti~:l? .:E' j~la~Cf"_. t:. _El•_ 11:1-- P:::':Ct Ll:ss? 1:c-) IT1iJCL .hr3t'! GI1E _:VL1$!1- tng structure Ge placed on any ane lot, nUr sliill any lot be further subdivided for the e»rposes nf creatiny additional lots or bui'_ding s:tes without filing a replat . (P-') That thc- plat pnovidc f.7r rictht -,f way width frr stret-)t s as incilcater! Qr. the prellminary . ~c•c-~c. -A-,~•~,,~- i-t_' .:i_... i. •,!i:1 .,ntil the continuation of the streets be dedicatQd ar deeded: A I' strip at uie endi: . r ,F~ 1:4 ges of all streets :hat terminate or barder the plat tour:c'.~.•:.-. (rc-...;-, ,.-.,r,- c..0 are required when streets terminate at the plat bo,,.:ndar:n_- -(P-S) That appcopriate street names he indica-r-c. That appropriate utility easements be inclca:c:d ..r' ..ap:es ~PPr.-,vr~d plat for distrtbution *,o the P1an:^.ing Department and the utility companies. Wntten ap- o.[')Val of the e~`~?:..P.: 1.. C!'1= i.ilf~• ~ i;?I)ct~..' (:il1S~ ~~Ec !'f'~;E:~!'L~: JS'1;_C t'_ ~~'1~ ~1:._~:I._'_t~l ,iI ":r1111~1 ! a , ~u:; ttr . ~i-r, i =;-,proved Ly the water plizr atyd fire pi`^tectior► dlst:ict. S:iid wLiter p'.c:-, nnu~iL uls-o have been appraved by t:-e apprapriatQ health avtliorities. The healtn au;horlues, water supplier (purveyor), ai-: ,+ii-e protection ciistric*_ will certify, prtor to the filing of the `lnal plat, or. the CacE ~ said water plan that the plan is in conformar:ce :vith the;r requirements and will acie- .juately satisty their respective needs. Sa!d :ti~•..~ . 1~., ar:r~ ..3~,. ={,i r.''1t pUrV%'ti'Gi:^Ji113I s:!Cc;{':f1'!-'ilWT.' -f.`---.I.'1-'-r:l•_- :?I!~1:;.c:' tf:at approprcate contractual arranyements have been macie vrith the plat spansar for con- stiructson of the watar system, in accoi•dance wlih the apprc~ved plan, and !n accordance ,,,nr.h a time schedulc. The t►me schCdute wtll pravide, in any case, for compteiion of ?i:e water system and inspection by the apprapriate health authoritses prior to appiicu- tlon for building permtts withtn the plaC. The contractual arranasments will inc2ude u provision holding Spokane County anci the purveyor harmless from claims by any lDt purchaser refused a buildinq perml*_ dt!e *..;n2 Ia11urP che ;}~iat st~i'~nscr sa}iS:ac: ~r- 11~' Tllp plat dadiCd!'..-ji l'..ii ~YaLS''St$L, -3s approved by County and State Iiealtli aUthoritics and t}ze locol f►rc rlis`rlct aiid pur- veyar wi!! be installed within this plat, and the subdtvidor wiil provide for individua! domestic water service as weIl as fire protectton ta each lat priar ta sale of eac,; 1.'T . 'I'hat a cerUf~c3_e title'.:e rl DePar'rc'e'.- the filinc ( - i T, ,31 (,r'-1 Tiiat ~h e .:ta::i: the „a:c_,. . L,e inriicacec on the final plat anci in the ded!cai!on, and thot the staff be a11uw->t; t<• \ti•,)rk wich the so.nnscr t~i deterrnine its besi use and luture status. (Cnntinusd) ~ . Li~:~iii't1i•' T?~ 1 ::1-, 'i: c 1•.1:. ' s.'. ~T°t' A11 constructiun withlri tne Pub1iC i2ly;it al . ! . . : , . . . ~ • . _ : i- plat or a 4and in the amount estimated by :ne Couniy Cny:r:cer to covice L,iC c,v,c. Uc S4_ - structlon oi !mpravements, constructfnn certificatiort, "A,: R_;i!r." p'.2n=., -in-! the streeL centerlines, shaIl be f[1Pd :vith thc- Gounty Engir. . (E- 7) No dfrect access .'rom lots to 112 iight of ways unttl SuCh ~:'d',v'_: :~rC• 7cJ1:~'.__._ ? I _i~ ~rt• f_ 5'~}=1_-.~1•-t1 if .:r.i._ . (E- flJ I'd:~ c1::e,_t _CC:e=. ir •r; . ~r.: t,-, .;,,ih =i y - , _ Councy Standards and established as County Roads. (E- 9) ftaad design, rough grading canstrvctton, and drainaye car-Ltrui f,_-r t~ r~•_!~r.:, _-~r and Stub Road connectlons are the responsibility of the developer. (E- 10) That the sponsor shall prQpare and submit to the County Engineer a do::ign propos _1 :i:-- ceptable to the State I-ilghway Department of the proposed State Highway-Caunty Ro•,'i intersectivn. State I-iighway Department approvat of the prc>pased design must be rL- celved prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to ihe Statc Aighway are to the responsibility of the sponsor anci may e.ither be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such imprvvements furnished to the Councy Enqirr,~~ ir r.7a ~,~:.3•.:r:: a; letorr•,>ne,: Lv •:f'.l? CO1.111?v Enriineer and the n1aLC-' f?Sr~t1L':a)• D~P?ftf.*'e?71I. III. Assessor ('1- 1) Tb:ii %1 `i?i11f• 1-,p .nciicate:? thP '1?lr:. Pl7( E:= :i •t 1r ~tjL.~ i• UCl1 C1dC11- ~ L' th! ~~:)Ulli'~~:1,,. _~;~.r c](:~~ .~if' !iili.."r ~~dff• , JV. f-;ealth Denartme-:t (h-1) That each lot be authartzed for the use af Indtvtdual on-site seviage dlsposa! systerns. C-i-21 The dedlcatary lanquage of the plat wtll sEare the spansor wlil assume nU respons:i-:?- tty ior provislon of domestlc water. (I•1-3) That canditional apptoval bs given sut:jecc to provisions in t:h~-: ptat for a piii-,lic sev.per system. Approval of the deslgn of said systems must be given hv County and State Health authorl.tes and the County Utlllttes Department prlQr to flling of the C[nal ptat. A suitable quarantee wlli be requlred to caver the cost o; pmvlding saEr. s1•scem in th? amount as determined by the Public Works Qepartmant. (H-4) That a statement be placed tn the dedlcatlon ta the effect that a public sewer systam wtll be made avatlat.,le for the plat ancl ir:dlvidual servlc,e :ti•tll be rrovided tfl each lr•t prlor to sale . (H-5) Priorto fUtng of the final plat, the sponsor shall present a•ri:i_ ,.!ar withtn the recorded servtce area of tfiz pnaposed water dlstrl,:. (N - b) That an on-s[te sewage management system be created and approved by rh•~ S pr, k3ne C.aunty Health Dtsrnct prtor to filir.g of the Ftna! Plat. r ~ a] l.Al'4 L+"1"tiR.LJ LOl.N LJI4'1ONS F+.-II! Fi L*P1~O' VAL Or IIU1_I Mf:,I:`1-i? Y G(1UhJTY DEPARTMENT SPOKA'"_~F. 0)~ !.T't 1 11, l:. .li';f; _;"-,iw1,'j; i ThF, IaVIP;a 'Je~Y MA:1tf:. -df ~!,'due SpG"57s;I ;:~-1a-1 SL1brT1I! CF'~+.: i_ 1.3 uf~1 ';-4 i' t':a&i~! ~ir :E.'J-dtlonr cieLPE?'~DpfI1E'Iit' a:id fc1alY:1.L`-",ric:I'1C-e Ur a1i 4::jnmL7#~ op{"•n 5pacE' Zaad t:[!•JE ~_a~~ ~he- fiIing oC the final p1ac; which documents shall prDvide, amonc~ other ttiTnga, 1-.)x a rt1inirraurri asscssment of mC?mbers of a home nwrters' asf~octation #L,r suCh sspen sp+3cE-'' dG'Ve?i=tp7t:~*~3* and rTbairhtt°!Pl-iYSc@', 'ai-`# C.7ir-t:d?'se.T?t'S r,e bti' '_htL, Planning D9cector i:~e:~~ ie_,~ FLhno t1t TR"r- c_IT'e.-.-ir_ :>E1owt'I as fe'i,'TB$iX1oTl arni'1 F=1C', , T':t'.°-,Z, be #3cC"':f"at+°1y de'- ffiierJ and given lc►$ and bIock nurrtibers. The final plat will show xhe future slaip s€atus of parceIs to be sold, parcel,s ta remaii-i public . e . , 3e-wer treat- rnent site) and parcels to rernain i.n comrnon ovrr►ershiia. c1 "I"hat the sponsnr, prior to ftl#ng of the fisaal plat, provide ;os minimu-m unpruve- mertt of the common open space land. ,uch impTovements wtll he accoEraplisheci at tl~~ ~ponsnr`s expense anr-l sltiall fnclude proper nu3raiitee o€ rrGlrr~mL)rn nTand- ards iDf irripa~ovemeaat (for exarnple: turtirAg and adequate sprinklln,-r which sha9t bv appenved by tl~e Planning Director. ,J) lf a Ift17al plat i5 1.:° 1_jr-, 'fleC! thni C?)es I`!,':i :''!e- ent1re a3lE.'1 ~r-_-~;]uSed fu:" M,atting on the prc-Siminar=y plat rpf record, tnen the fisst finaP pl~t filed w?1l ir;- ciude t.ne recreatian area and the sewer treatmerat sn-c-. i) '4Written approval af tho 1~~catCan nf inqre,s and egress conrectrons to ti3,e State Hryt_- way ;Inu5t be receiveci f-rom the StarP F?inhwav Denar-Tr.tent ,.rinr t.a `lkinr9 of t~~~ ~inal p !a t , ~.'d ThaI 8i1 aSr1gatioi1 eaSE!fi'tlei7t sd"CiSfr7cttlIy LCi th+? Spokal'1e i~'`^.:t-F`;-'~L fioai'd be t,:i': ",}'?r.- 1'~:I*~'~i~ b3::~•°117ti; 4L►-"f ~'L)ds~E' ~FSt~>~ +~SIiC~ ~}~,_~;_ld.'~ ~i''~,`a i1t1::l;3A .~7!7[' . Ttiat a declaration NL-)j-,-Signr€icanc-s-° be issue.:, in acrcorrlance w:;li Sectior: l 340 oi the 5pokane County Envirrnmontat Ordinance (SCEO) prior ~pproval of this r~c,osnmendation by the Board of County C:arnmls,51onecs, or tFaat any apprcrvir~g a+ctfor of the BQard twe- conditioraed upon issuance of fLnal L)eac1aratfon €~f Nan-Sigrlificarsce an accncdant'e wtth SCEO 11, 15, 340, N071: "I`IYe i}ffiCiaI f1lE' Co61ta].n5 dl7 eT4ViroI1['FfeCltal checkilst li'Or the pioposal and ia staff fevlew of their checklist as reqvire,; 'wVia,C P S a;-- ! rr-^a H , That o{ r}:e ple3r. .,Cr '1'e?"l 'kIhinCt L?1e' dedicatioYk ct.l t"!~.~1'6't [i'! ""a'„' ~ to the publie and appraval af the rriad system .tn tt~e piat by the Courtty Engineer. That p1ans, prvfi:les f and cross sectlons showing proposed staeet centerline and +cuPb grades be submitted to ihe +Cour~ty Engineer for approval prior to construCt%on and the fi1ing of a ffnal plat. (E- 3) That drainage plans and d'esign caiculatlons showing i:f°ae crradc-s and alignment of drai.n- age facil'rties be subrnitted to the County Engineer fcar aaproval prior to constnaCt.ton ond the fiPing c-if a finat plat. (E- 4) Cc~ristrr~cti+~n a~riC~?ie~ the p~~se+~ public s~~ets and easements ~h~ni~ i~~ ~~:rformed t~nder the dlrect supervisian of a licensed land sur°ve}Dr, who shall be r~sponsible for perpet° uating al~ evldence ot the Ivcation oi' suavey monurrtents vhich rn~y be clisir~bed ciuring constructlcan and who shal3 furnlsh the Gounty Engineer with "As Built" pIans &nd ti certs- fa.cate in vrrft~~g thafi all img~rovements were instaIlecP tv the 1ines and grac~~s -,hown :-x: the appraved can structicra plans and that a!1 dxstut'l~ed rnonur~~~~~ ~avc- been reglaced . Ner conscruction work is to te performed w^ith thv Public Rlght of Way mntil a permit has been tssu~~ by +the Cour,ty EngznePrP -k1l work, i5 subject to inspection and approval 4y r tti ECoRit4Cy EP1g1nee!C, . ' ^r ~ 1 ll ~ z~r INC. S 717 PINES ROAD . SPOKANE, WASHING70N 99206 . (509) 928-4220 October 17, 1977 a~zz.~.,~t ~r E.D - C 1971' R E C E I V E Spokane County Commissioners 0 C T 19 1977 W. 1116 Broadway Spokane, Washington SpOKANE COUNTY RE: PE-1 >>>A-77 zE 96A-77 PLANNING DEPARTMENT~ Dear Sir: We wish to appeal the no descision action taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at their October 14, 1977 hearing, regarding PE-111A-77 ZE 96A-77 for platting of Sylvia Court Subdivision. + WOLFLAND, INC. i ~ i Z. F. U. Seipp - President • tl t P • • ` • • ~ WOLFLAND, INC• VOID fF NOT CASHED WITHIN SIXTY DAYS ~2513 } ro ~ 5POKANE, WASH INGTON . ~ " , . , . e ~ W i i~ , • - , DATE CHECK NO. AMOUNT ' • October 1/Y 1777 7122 $25 -O0"~ZY F = , PAY ' - , - . ~ To C . . THE ORDER oF SPOKANE COUNTY TREASURER BUSINESS A OUNT , ~ • ' ,"„Q~+. u : BY PAC IFIC NATIONAL BANK ' . BY ! OF WASHINGTON I, 1 SPOKANE, W,ASHINGTON i: L 2 5 Les,O L 3 31• 70 L04 O301" ..r ~ ALVIN J WOLFF, INC REALTORS Complete ReaJ Estate Service ~ r ~ - - T /04- 7r - - , ~~-Z1 -.ve ~ _~,~/~r~~.~-__._ ' L~~~ + _~.~~..Q~t ~ - - i ~ ; ~ - ` ~ h _ _ _ ( ,L► - ~'~11E .f ~ - ~L ~q tz ^ n ~A.! G'l /'.4 ~ '1~ - ~ . ~ - - - ° - ~ _ - _ ~(ti.'.'.~G.lreLr~l ~G _ , ~ ~ -o t _ Al . _ ~ ' ~~~~.s~ • _ 1 r ~ - ~ - - - - _ , - - ~ _ - - - - - - ' ~ - ► • ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION & ZONE CLASSIFICATION ) UPGRADING, PE-1111A-77 SYLUTA COURT, ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ZE-96A-77, AGMILTURA TO SIN~`l.'E-F-ftMILY ) RESIDENTIAL AND/OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ) WOLFLAND, INC. (F. V. SEIPP) ) ' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P. M., on December , 8, 1977, at their office in the County Courthouse to consider the above mentioned Preliminary Subdivision and Zone Classification on the following described property: Section 7, Township 25 N., Range 44, E. W. M. The E% of the NW 4 of the NW 4 of the SE 4 of sai d Secti on 7 lying south of the Northern Pacific Railroad R/W, except the Nly 15 feet and except the S 144 feet of the W 166.8 feet. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. ' - NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony either for or against the application of the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 3rd day of November, 1977. VERNON W. OHLAND CLERK OF THE BOARD _ - . , B~ { *Rtanne Montague, Deputy Cler ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMh1ISSI0NERS OF SPOKAfVE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIh1INARY ) SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION ) UPGRADING: PE-1111-77, SYLVIA COURT, ) COMh1ISSI0NERS' DECISION ZE-96-77, AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE ) FAP9ILY SUBURBAN: Sponsor: Wolfland, Inc. ) This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, UJashington, to render its decision concerning the request of !Jolfland, Inc. (F. V. Seipp), South 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington 99206, for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading; and The Board having received the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission to deny subject preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgradning, said denial set forth in the June 24, 1977 minutes of the Planning Commission. The Board having conducted its own public hearing on August 11, 1977, at the request of the applicant, Mr. Seipp, and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board having requested and received a legal opinion of the Spokane County Chief Civil Deputy as to whether the proposed zone change f rom Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban would constitute "spot zoning", said opinion is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to uphold the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission to deny the preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this lst day of September, 1977. VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk of the Board BY: . ..,t Ll ELt / . • 4 AU , . 1977 MEMO TO: Board of County Commissioners ~,~;~F~,s;`; { f;~~,r.;;T~;• l,~.Y~ X FROM: Jerry Neal, Chief Civil Deputy Prosecuting Attorney DATE: August 29, 1977 RE: PE-1111-77, ZE-96-77, Sylvia Court, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban You have asked for an opinion whether the proposed zone change from agricultural to multiple family suburban would con- stitute "spot zoning." Tize proponent, Wolfland, Inc. (F. V. Seipp) proposes to construct 32 multi-family dwelling units on 3.2 acres or a gross density of about 10 dwelling units per acre. The land is currently zoned agriculture which permits a gross maximum density of about five single family dwelling units per acre. (See Zoning Ordinance, Section 4.04.040 where- in a lot minimum of 7,000 square feet and 65 feet of frontage is established) mhe land is located near the corner of Knox and Bessie in the 5pokane Valley. Single family dwellings surround the property to the north and wESt. An older home with associated agricultural pursuits adjoins the land to the west. The railroad right of way adjoins the property to the north. Single family residential homes constitute a broader perimeter of the property to the west, south and east. There are no multiple family dwelling units within five or six blocks of the subject property. I would estimate that the average density of the single family residences in the broader area surrounding the subject property is three per acre. There does not appear to be any other vacant land south of the railroad tracts in the near vicinity of the subject property. The nearest multiple family dEaelling units I noticed were four duplexes located about 10 blocks away on Sargent and the multiple family units located at the Argonne and Freeway interchange. For your information I have attached a section map colored schemed to show the zoning surrounding the property in question. As you can see for several blocks to the east, west and south of the subject property, the land is zoned either agriculture, two family and single family residential. While all zones permit duplexes on a minimum of 15,000 square feet of land and 90 feet of frontage, none allow multi-family structures. • ♦ y Board of Cour.ty Commissioners August 29, 1977 Page Two Spot zoning has been defined by our Supreme Court as: "Spot zoning has come to mean arbitrary and un- reasonable zoning action by which a small area is singled out of a larger area or district and specially zoned for a use classification totally different from and inconsis- tent with the classification of surrounding land, and not in accordance with the comprehensive plan. Spot zoning is a zoning for private gain designed to favor or benefit a particular individual or group and not the welfare of the community as a whole. See C. Rhyme, Municipal Law § 32-3, at 825 (1957). The vice of a spot zone is its in- evitable effect of granting a discriminatory benefit to one or a group of owners and to the detriment of thEir neighbors or the community without adequate public advant- age or justification. Thomas v. Town of Bedford, 11 N.Y. 2d 428, 184 N.E.2d 285 (1962). Zoning merely for the bene- fit of one or a few, or for the disadvantage of some and with no substantial relationship to the public health, safety, general welfare or morals, in conflict with either the comprehensive zoning plan or ordinance is arbitrary and capricious and unlawful. Eckes v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Baltimore Cy., 209 Md. 432, 121 A.2d 249 (1956." Lutz v. Longview, 83 Wn.2d 566, 520 P.2d 1374 (1974). See also McQuillin, Municipal Corporations 3d Ed.Rev. ~ 25.83 wherein it provides: "Although not denounced by any hard and f ast rule, zoning in a haphazard manner is not favored and, on the contrary, zoning should proceed in accordance with a definite and reasonable policy. Thus, a zoning ordinance or an amendmEnt of a zoning ordinance to permit piecemeal or haphazard zoning is void, and so-called 'spot zoning,' where it is without a reasonable basis, is invalid. The legislative intention in authorizing comprehensive zoning ' is reasonable uniformity within districts having in fact ' the same general characteristics and not the marking off, for peculiar uses or restrictions of small districts essentially similar to the general area in which they are situated. Accordingly, an ordinance cannot create an 'island' of more or less restricted use within a district zoned for a different use or uses, where there are no differentiating relevant factors between the 'island' and the district. Ordinarily, the term 'spot zoning' is used to denote an amendment to the municipal zoning law . reclassifying one or more lots or parcels of land for a use out of harmony with the classification of the surrounding areas and without regard to public welfare. While the term . Board of County Commissioners August 29, 1977 Page Three . 'spot zoning' may not necessarily be confined to small areas or lots, the cases in which the courts have struct down rezoning ordinances as spot zoning have involved single lots or small areas. Thus, singling out of one lot or a small area for different treatment from that accorded to similar surrounding land indistinguishable from it in character, for the economic benefit of the owner of that lot or to his economic • detriment, is invalid 'spot' zoning." (Emphasis Added) Accordingly, in my view to change the zoning of the subject property from agriculture to multiple family suburban would be : " . singling out of one lot or a small area for different treatment from that accorded to similar surround- ing land indistinguishable from it in character, for the economic benefit of the owner of that lot. and would be "spot zoning." To allow multiple family uses would permit a much higher density of the subject property than permitted by any surrounding property. It is further noted that the plan commission invited the proponent to resubmit a proposal for duplexes which of course would not necessitate a zone change. I hope the above will be of assistance to you. If you have any further questions in this regard please give me a call. is J.N. r - , ~~GL.EER SPOKANE COUNTY, WIASHINGZON DotP C) C. IoPSLR ,1921 lnter-ofbice Comrnunitution •To PLANiNING CQ',%DfLSSION From GARY KEN1vALY, PLANNING & TRAFFIC DIVISION Er:GIN`EER Su6jec! 'r'0 kD COiTDT`r'I0'1S * FOR PE -1 1 SS l.A/l 4 Co-o itl- ::COti1DITI0115 CIRCLED 4i'?L`T 10 PLA`:` UliMER COIN;SIDEF,~,.1'ION E Z tRZt condit:onal approval of the plat is givzn subject ro dedication oF Right of v v1ay ~o the pu5lic 2nd appraval of the road system in the plat by the Courtty Eqr_oiuear; E 2that plans, profiles, and cross sections showi.ng pzoposed strzet cenrerZiae and curb grades be subrsitted to the Couaty Enoineer for approval prior to corestructioa aud the iiZing of 2 fina3 plat; - th2t drainage plans and design calculations showing the gradzs 2ad alig=eat of drain- 2oe iacilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to constnzctian az3 the filing of a final plat; _ (Dunder cozstruction within the proposzd public streets and easenents shal2 be perfoz-3zct the direcC supervision of z licensed laad surveyor, who sha13 be respansible ' for perpetuatiag all svidence of the location of. survey ronuments which, may bz dis-tu:bed during construction and who shall furaish the Cou;ty Erigi.neer with "As xuiit" plaas and a certificate in writir:g that all impraveaients wzre inst2lIed to t:ez lines 2n3 grades showrc on the 2pproved constzuctioa pl.ans and that 2l3, disturbsd none,ments have been replaced; . . ' E 5 rio con-atructior. c:ork is to be percormed within the Psblic Right of k'ay unitil aparn3t has oe?n issued by the County Gnoineer. All c,•ork is subject tv inspzct-iaa and appraval by the County Enjiaeer; E 6 all co:cs`zuction within the Pu51ic Right of Way is to be comple[ed prior to filing - the f inal p3at or a bond in th_ amount es Cim,ated by the County Eaginezr to cover the cost oi coastruction oz improvzments, constructioa certification, "as Buzlt" p?aus, an3 :::0 i1LLilenting the s treet centerlines shal1 be f ilzd with the County En;iazzr. -E 7-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additional right of ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads. . . - E 8-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed - to County Standards and established as County Roads. E 9-road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for 1/2 rights of ways - and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. E 10-that the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal accept- able to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road inter - section. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highcaay are to be ttie respon- sibility of the Sponsor and may either he constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the' County Engineer and the State Highway Department. ' L,, that all roads -,j:~thin the plat be curbed and/or p~.ved to the specifications of the County ~ngineer. Elcistino County roads provlding direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved andlor cur'oed to the standards of the County Engineer. ~ PE-1111A-77 & ZE-96A-77 In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Wolfland, Inc. (F. V. Sefpp), South 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Sylvfa Court. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to R-1 and/or R-2 the property described below, such zone change to become sffective only upon the ffling of a final plat, or plats, of such property. The property befng platted is described as the East 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W. M., J.ying south of the NPRR r/w, except the Nly 15 feet and except the S 144 feet of the W 166.8 feet, Spokane County, Washington. (North of Knox Avenue, west of Bessi,.e Road. ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SSo COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Oif~, ,S,J_e , , Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, (rlashington, and over the age of twenty-one yearso " That on d G'~• he pErsonally posted three (3) true and correct copies of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLTC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: 1 o T 1 r I t/ s • o ~ S ~Q ~~~dX ~ ~J 2. / • 1-2. ' v5 t-- n tS T .S 3, p . . -7 _ ee ~ W. ~v (t e o ~ o . ~ c,~--~--- Subscri'aed and sworn to me , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IlN AND FOR SPOKANE COUAITY, WASHIiVC7T0N Residing at Spokane, Washington ~ PE-1111-77 & ZE-96-77 In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Wolfland , Inc.(F . V. Seipp), South 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Sylvia Court. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats, of such property. The property being platted is described as the East 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 7, Township 25 1V. , Range 44, E.W. M, lying South of the NPRR R/W, except the Northerly 15 feet and except the South 144 feet of the West 166.8 feet, Spokane County, Washington. (North of Knox Avenue, we s t of Be s sie Road.) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SSo COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) 1 Being first duly sti•rorn, deposee and says: ~ That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one yearso ! r That on N , 19 ~1, he personally posted three (3) true and correct copies{lof the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: 1 0 1~~~ ~ VCJ ~J~' ~ N v ~ 2o r L,L ~ 3. Subscri'aed and sworn to me , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHIIvOTON Residing at Spokane, Washington . • AGENDA, OCTOBER , 1977 -4 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Ti.rne: Friday, October 14, 1977, 9:00 A.M. Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING , I. PE- I111A-77, Sylvia Court ZE- 96A-77, AgrLcultural to Single Family Residentfal and/or Two-Family Resldential a. Location: Section 7, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W. M. The E 1/2 of the IVW 1/4 of the 1VW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said Section 7, lying south of the Norther Pacific RailRoad r/w, except the Nly 15 feet and except the S 144 feet of the W 166 . 8 feet. b a Sponsor: Wolfland, Inc o(F.V. Seipp) South 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineers: Simpson Engineers, Inc. North 909 Argonne Spokane, WA 99206 d. Sfte Size: 3.2 acres e o Number of lots: 8 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: duplexes g. Exfsting Zoning: Agricultural, Aprfl 26, 1946 h. Proposed Zoning: Single Family Residential and/or Two-Family Residential • i. Water Source: Wa shington Water Power Company j. School District: West Valley School District k. Method of sewage disposal: Individual on-site disposal systems 1. Envi.ronm.ental Impact: A topic of discussion at thls hearing may be whether or not thi s proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact v 4..~... e . ~ ~ ~ • ;Y~ a- ~ ~ i r y~ I 3/~OMNC , ~ ' • i /t Ilr0 a..w,.I - < < f1( , 1 i~. ' i t C.Ou/t~ wf/~7e..1 ~ , eoI ~ ' . . IS ~.f~~~ +K;, " 1 : r r- I J ~ ' ^ 1 , - vosLC.r~c: 't: • •o` _IP11yR"1 •w-r -'-s r^ - ~./D~7w w..~! F: . : t . ~ ~ ' ~ 4 r' - ~3~'` ] . Y ~ ~ L~_ ~ ~ ~1L6l~L.~~(4'.t)(;,J \ ` L t0 lC► Vf 1 t\ i'• :t~ w ' ♦ ~ Y 1~ N Ilb~ 1(~ ,`~-~1 'a .nt I~.c.~ ' ; ~ . 0 • 1 r~yy,A •.t _ f M JY• ' ' ~ ~1. ' ' r I ~ 2- M ILE ` ~ ~ \ ~j , , , 1 •~s'~~ r ~~mraj _ ~ Q _ ; , o : r ~S • I C. 0 _ ~ ! ~ W •.1• 11 E, • i.ac n i ~I_ ~y ~ ; I'•~ voCEwA~ R ~ ,~i " , ~ '_^~~}~~I w..~ i. oi] i I ~f . 1 I` ~ rt"►~f ~rx: ~J~ I t I , I ~ i 1 k..^vt!- t ~a ~ • ' ~ ~I ~ •~.r 1 j ~ L. - _ _ r f ~ ' V ~ ;I ' ` ~ j~ • j~ : ~ , ~ ~''~SG_.~''_e _E ' ~ ~g~.:.►,~~~ ~ ~ ~ •!r~'~-"~i - 1 - ~ . . DEPT. FILE REF, STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any add' ional prtinent data has subsequently been reviewed by th e ~ ~ " V,-t,v I ` The following data briefly describes the proposal: . A. Action Requested. • etLv~.t,u27 Izj 2 _tun?- z L B. Descr iption of Proposal: :tcA ~m ~ ~t~ S ~ C. Location of ro osal: t:oqgr 4k Auv~c,_Lo_ ~~j Renic~ II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions : 231(o,~t$, ~ 13~1`I-JI(:> }---.r s , ~ _ I ~ B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: C. Discussion of impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendations: - Based on II A, B and C above the staff Lj--41-tmaa, . IacUS , r I \ 'T Y regard3.ng Section 7, Township 25 N. , Range L~1.~., E.W.M. ~'he East 1/2 0f the N~' 1/!~ of the N~J l/!~ of the SE 1/4 of Section 7, lying South 02' the NPRR R/W. except the N1.y 15 feet and except the SQuth 144 f eet of the West 166.8 feet thereof : We the undersigried wish 3.t to be known that we are o osed to the propasal for zone change from Agricultural to MultiplaYni19 Suburban and 22posed to Multi-f'amily dwelling units on the above described property. Name Addre s s ~ LY ; , ~ J w 1 ~ a ~4 t ~ b `}?,~t~ , ~ ~ ~7 • ~ ~ ~ - ~ - Cs~ yL~ t el . 4z Z~:Iooll,,• ~ r I~ C6.3 ~ ~ ~ f• J~J , /r , t I r~ 5PO~ANE VALLEq r'IRE DEPARTIAENT ~ &&a4 vtw elv&. / EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANf, WASHINGTON 99106 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 I ; ~ . June 15, 1977 ? I, ~ , ~ a u p .r " \ ' Mr. Fred Dayharsh, P1 anningi/Di r16ctor Spokane County Planning,~Commissio ~ North 811 Jefferson , Spokane, Washington 99201 ~ Q Dear h1r. Dayharsh. . The following Zone,Change,has been reviewed for fire protection: , r r , a ~ ti . PE-1109-77 yPOAKLAND 'ACRE5 +ZE- 95-77 ~,Mains,and hydrants sneed'to be~installed in this area. ; PE-111 0-77 ~a~' MOEN AOD IT IOiV to Greenacres ZE 96-77`~ ±-Ma7ns and ii,ydrants need to be, ilns~talled in this area. ° F ~ , , ~PE- 111 1, .x 77 ` , SYLV IA COt1RT ZE 9E-77 Ma*i ns and iiydrarits need to, be i nstat ed i n this area. ~ 1t A1 Cook Lt. of Inspec'tors . Fire Frevention Bureau 4 , : - • . _ . _ _ i ~ . IVE i kt~ , t ~ .1llN .J U 1JIt ' ; SPd6tANE COUNTY NL/iNIVING DEPARTMENT ~ PRE VEIV 7' FIRES SAVE LI VES ~ - - ~ ' - - r~ - - OFI.LLE OF C0UNTY ENGIsiEER _ SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHlNGTON DotP )Ut,-1t-__ 20 I 9aZ Inter-office Communication To pLANNING CO~MSSION . Front GARY KEiv'NALY, PLANNIIv'G & TRAFFIC DIVISION E~+'GINEER 91~-6 V-f- ~ Sub ject R0 ~D COrIDIT IO?3S * FOR P (E 1 I I I - I ~1 ~E 9{pp ~ #COrIDITIO~dS CIT'CLED 4i PLY TO t~Lk~ U'~~~R ~COINJIDERATION ~ that condit3orzal app;oval of the plat is giv2n subject tv dedicatfon of Right of ;Izy to the puSiic and appraval of the road system in the plat by the Caunty Enoiae2r; . E 2 that plaris, profiles, and cross szctions showing proposed street centerZiae aad curb grades be subrsitted to the County En ;ineer for approval prior to cortstructi.on aad . the iiling of a fiaal plat; • . •(E 3~ that drainz~e plans aad design calculatioas shocaing the Srades aad aligeat of dra~.a- . ~t age iacilities be subsitted to the Couaty Enoineer for appraval pzior to construction an3 the filing of a final plat; ~ coas tructiorc within the proposzd public streets and easements shalI be gez-fo=ed under the direct supsrvision of a licensed laad surveyor, who sha13 be resgonsible ' for p?rpatuatiao all evidence of the location of survey iconumeats cfhicli may bz - distu:bad duriag construction and who shall furaish the County Engineer wi,th "As .Built" plans and a certificate 3n Writino that all improvem`nts w2re iastaIled to the lines and grades shown on the approved constructioa plans aAd that z1I distuzbed mon=?nts have been replaced; . . ' E 5 no cons tructior. work is to be per'ro~ed within the Psblic Right of k'ay unti,I ap?rnit . has oezn issuzd by the County znoine`r. All work is subjett to insp2ct.ioa arcd app~.-ova? by the County Engrizeer; E 6 all cons-Lruction within the Public Right of Way is to bz completed p;-ior to filing - the f inal plat or a bond in the aumount es tis.alted by the County Enginze: to cover the _ eost oA. coasGru`tion oi improv2aents, construction certification, "As Built" p?ans, ' and :::onumenting the street centerlines shall ba. filed with the County Erbi.azr., E 7-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways unti2 such time as additional right of ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads. . • ' - - - E 8-no direct access fram lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed - to County Standards and established as County Roads. ' E 9-road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for 1/2 rights of ways = and Stub Road connections are the responsibilfty of the Developer. E 10-that the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a desiga proposal accept- able to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Hfghway-County Road inter- 4 , - section. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the respon- sibility of the Sponsor and may either he constructed or a bond to cover the cost o£ such improvements furnished to the County Engfneer in the amount as tietermined by the'County ' Engineer and the State Highway Department. ' " Ell PC_0-?os~_::D P(Ar SAovL_o BE 2E UE Sl6„/C0 ' Z-a Cv^/4 TC 1~tz-o t~o s ED G X T~. n~ Slo..l o~_ ~E S Si E/2o.4v ~oT~T~ o~ /~ig~lSF-~ ~c~ " ~E t 2~ mV uTi P• LE -~i4..~~ ~Y S u 8 v Q-(34•4 -2-,o,J E ~~.✓rc E Co~./D/iib.✓S . U 1~,914✓ (5#•1 FN c o F' IV1 ~4 ~ S E= r E C-O 4v F,nl ve To !i~% C[.u0 E~~p ~ P141/~n/ G-- ♦ IN STa LciATLo -.1 0i:- Gv ,Z.3 S) S ~ D Ec.~a. L~~S A-~!~ t~i~-~•v,y ~~•✓T~1vG o . - ~_,,,,,~l~.o ✓~+E~T o~ I. E'SS IC ~o~ p To 1A1Ct,vDE' 30! • a.4v/N6v 7"0 !G~loX 1 - : XvEpvE, 1NSri4l114Tco..1 oF Cv23 qoo0 5106'W4U<, ALo..lG (1V4E5T S1.0Fo ~3 ~,~„►p~crEw~ENT o~ KNOx ~v~vE T-o t~vCLVoE' s10Ew4LK 1 Gv~2Q .4-442 ~ dr- C_Xcsr1.✓G A-J. sr-oF aF _ SPOFtANE +CGUN'f'Y DATE: FIMDM: C]UMl'Y CpMAAi8b1QlVVER# t7FFitE FARM TQt 0 l4t#RiOULTURE 0 ASSESWA 0 AUDITBft ri dUlCDtHOCt1M CJ HEALfiM q J04Ei+IIIEODJR'1' Q uw & r~~ ~ ~ARKs ~ ~~CRF-ATtON a PEFOON+tEL t,.;.~WnQ n PWXECuro~ Cl PURCHAsINa * SHEAi~ ~ ~~~R ci - - 0 _ FCA You"t a INFOOtr~ATioN ~ G Ft€PLrrO: - - - ~ 0 MJMY VEJIM iNFOftMATIO+n To ~ ~ ~ O L~ F Zr .A. N Z7 INC. S 717 PINES ROAD . SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 . (509) 928-4220 Jul y 5, 1977 REC;EIVED .aL'L 0 6 1977 ~'t~;;'- Board of County ' ~ SpokanE County Courthouse Spokane, Washington Subject: PE-1111-77 ZE 96-77 Dear Sirs: , We wish to appeal the decision rendered on the above mentioned Plat by the Spokane County Planning Commission on June 24, 1977. We f eel with only four menbers present at the hearing we did not receive a fair hearing. We further f eel with the railroad tracks bordering one side and the arterial Knox Avenue on the other side the platting into 4-Plex lots was proper. WOLFLAND, INC. F. V. Seipp President , FUS/sh R ~ E C E I V E . JUL ?1977 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1`14 r"c,QI wvtfP ALVIN J WOLFF, INC REALTORS Cninnlefe Real Estate Service 1 , ^ 1+- 4~~~~E CoGy~ r y rr ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Offi ce Communi cation 4~1H o\S1 Date: May 26, 1977 T0: Spokane County Planning Commission ~ FROM: Eugene C. Prather, R.S. , SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat - SILVIA COURT 1. References: a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 50' bq Simpson dated May 10, 1977. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Re- sources, State of Washington, 1969, c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the Spokane Valley, D. K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Met- ropolitan Spokane ftegion, U.S. Army Corps of Engi-neers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Sezvice, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Spokane Countq, Washin~ton Engin;eering Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Logs of wells in Township 25, Range 44, Sections 7. g. Field Surveq Report, Scott Fink, Spokane County Health District, May 24, 1977. h. Map: Spokane Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1950. 2. Topography, soils and water. a. This proj ect lies in a relatively flat area in northwest Dishman. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located over the $pokane Valley Aquifer. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravellq loast with 0 to SX slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; coatains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yfeld moderate to very large amounts of water. SCH D-ADM-118 Silvia Court Page 2 May 26, 1977 d. The data f.rom wells in the area shows the wells are 90 to 120 feet deep and have static water levels varying from 56 to 74 feet below the surface. The total nitrogen level was 1.2 ppm. The Washington Water Power Company has indicated that it can supply domestic use and fire protection water for the plat upon completion of agree- ments with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. a. The plat sponsor has proposed 7 lots on 3.2 acres. Each lot is to be served bq a public water system and its individual on-site sewage dis- posal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study , Dr. Todd con- sidered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phos- phate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank eff luents. 3. "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol- ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."--"The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present i.mpact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentratioa, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already, a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater in the range of 1.20 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges from 1.30 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards per- mit up to 10 ppm. i . ,•S ilvia Court Page 3 May 26, 1977 d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the follouring general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economicallp available for this project. 2. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal from sludges. These systems require more land area than a conventional sub- surface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons,have safety h(azards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields. 4. Recommead that: a. A public water system including fire flows serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. b. Each,lot be authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage system until a public system becomes available. cc: Charles E. Simpson, Engineer, Inc. North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 R E C E I V E M AY 2 71971 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AGENDA, JUNE 24, 1977 ^ LEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIIVG COMMISSION Time: Friday, June 24, 1977, 9:30 A.M. Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) PRELTMTNARY StTBDIVISTON AN ZON .,.ASSTFICATTON iTPC A17jNC 6. pE,-,1_11 1 -7 'a C,~qLL 7E- 96-77 , Acrricultural ko Multinle Family Subu an a. Location: Section 7, Township 25 N.,Range 44,E.W.M. The East 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 7, lying South of the NPRR R/W, except the Nly 15 feet and except the South 144 feet of the West 166.8 feet thereof. b. Sponsor: Wolfland, Inc. (F. V. Seipp) South 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineers: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 d. Site Size: 3.2 Acres e. Number of Lots: 7 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Multi-family dwelling units g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established April 26, 1946 h. Proposed Zoning: Multfple Family Suburban f. Water Source: Washington Water Power Company j. School District: West Valley School District k. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact, o* • ~ +I ~ ~ r r' , ' ~ • ri! o° i bi ' . ~ L 'A ` \ Q ; • ~ • S \ ~ ~ I r a : ~ •'4V~ ~ /~~~J • . a JI 1 ~b ~ ~ ~ • : s ~ a - ~ ,J ( ~ f j2' ~ : o . 3 . • ~ - r-s ross.ann~s~ ~f ~ a i. i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~L a 1 ~ ' _ ~._~`,'C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - Y . • • ~ n TL . _ ~I~ • , • w s~o ~ , ' a ~ . ~ _ • ~ , ` . i • a ' " ' _ _ ~ ' I2V ♦ ~111 ^ 7 ~ ~ • _ e I r gc ~ : g~o r' y.r ~o. ~Z'ri ~ ' _ •s - ~ r ~ ! .M.VMOY J ~ » ~.ti+ . ~ a 4 S ~:~er ' IOA d ` • z ► i• v[ •"'e ♦ ~~I r 4~ i0 w . ~ a Z~ •r 'sc'jua ~ • y , t : b i S ~il~' ~ ' J, g • lGb►fi~" - - ~ Ju~or` c.r•x il ..uo._ -6- ► JUf1e G, 1977 Ci jty O.Fi MIlIWOOd Ea st 9103 Fr+edert ck Spokane, WA 99205 RE: 3ylvia Court, PE-1111-77, $ection 7, Townahip 25 N'., Rarige 44, EWM Gentlemen: Pur4uant to RZlV, 58.17.080, please review tho enclosed preltml:iary plat of Syivia Court, and forward any appropriate comaents to aur office prtor to june 11, 1977. Tha nk you for your coopeta►t !on . S lncerely, Robert r. Bethard9: Plbt Administcator RjB:ki Enclosurae 2 ~ CLARENCE E. SIMPSON - RICHARD L. SIMPSON CHARiES E. SIMPSON Utarence ~ Jc'~n,p6on enqineer6,94c. Cldll ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS Regi.rtered in Wasbington and Idabo TELEPHONE 926-1322 OFFICE N. 909 ARGONNE RD., SPOKANE, WASH. 99206 MAY 10, 197? PRELIl4INARY PLAT SYLVIA COU13T LEGA.L DESCRIPTION The East 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 71 T. 25 N. , R. 4+ E.W.M. lying South of the N. P. R. R. right of way, Except the Northerly 15 feet and Except fihe South 144 feet of the West 166.8 feet, i.n Spokane County,-Washington. L WA y~tic 1 ss'ONAI c E D mAY161g71 SPOKANi co~% MENj pEQpR1 p~AWN1N~ 41k ~ • E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM AREA AND DISTANCE ■OOOOOOOOOOO00oO0oo0oooO00oo00O00o0o00oO0o0oo0oo0ooO0OO000o0OOo Total amount of land in this Subdivision: 3.'Z Acres Proposed density of the Plat: Lots/Gross Acre Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Acres ° Proposed use of controlled adjoining land: W-h ~vr+~1e F,•e •t7t~i+r~c;} o. What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? - &~; ~ tl %ll~,, a o~ ~ Shopping facilities? Municipal Boundary: g6yn„Je(M,#aved street or highway? K aox~ ~ LAND USE 000 0 0000000000001300 00000000 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 IndicatE the proposed land use of the plat: 5ingle Family Dwellings ( Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi-family dwelling units Indicate which lots: &U 16-~~ 4- + -o 4p ~,w Mobile i-Iomes ( Other ( Describe other uses: Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: n o y~~ What is the present use of the property proposed to 'oe platted? V acgr~- List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture:. acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: 3,Z, ~acres. Other: Acres I s keeping of animals desired? No (~C Yes ( Type : 0 IMPROVIIMEENTS ■ooooo00000oooooaooooaoooooooaoooooaooooo000000oooooaooooo00000000❑ Do you plan to file the P1at in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi-phase dev- elopment? r_- VA i ,-e;4y _ , To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel Minimumo Curb ancI Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( Describo any combinations of above: What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: Li.~ r Street -~mprovements completed? f~Substantial number of lots occupied? Cowo,,,lb~ Is dedl,:ation of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( X Yes ( Describe: Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: "740 -f-~ 1,►000 Square feet Number of bedrooms ~,-7, Q.,d Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( Yes (?G Will any special deed restrictions be included in tne sale of lots? No 04 Yes ( If "yes", explain: UTILITIES •ooooo0000oooooaoODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOO0ooooo00000000000000oooooaooooo Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank (X Lagoon ( Treatment plant ( Other, or -combinations (Describe) Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( Public system Private community system ( , , Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements (X Overhead utility easements Utilities in streets ( X). No easements ( ,Indicate the di~stance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main: feet. Indicate size of nearest main: Inches t01% 'r K''"'X , List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: Electricity: \A./.W.P, Gas: W.V1.P• Water: Phone: ID, r . , E X H I B I T A Page2 PRELIMINARY PLAT APPL:LCATION FORM (Continued) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ■ooooo0oooooaooaooooo000oooooaaooooo0000oooooaooooo0000000000000❑ PROPOSED PLAT NAME : S Y LV 1 A. C O t~'QT I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has heen prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. w S(Signed) Date : ~ 'Ci , 19?~ oy''y (Address) Phone: zip : 9 9' c> c. o ~FG/sT~g``~ Fs~'~oNal. svx EAL • -r please print I, LVO L,. D I/vC . , the sponsor of this proposed subdivision, am the (owner . ; builder agent ( option holder ( contract holder C of the property proposed to ee platted and have completed the information requested of ine and do hereby testify that it is correct and accurate. . - (Signed) Date : . • * , (Address) Phone : _ Zip : V _ NOTARY Date : 11 ~ NOTARY SEAL: Specsal Comments: j• , ,r.. .,U ~ . v r : u ~ ~ c ■000000000000000000■ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING DEPARTME[VT Dc"W000000000000000• 40 PLANNIIVG DEPARTMENT INFORMATION Date Submitted: 5 ~O-71 Checked bY: 44-r School District: Vd*el4 Preliminary Pl ~ at Fee. i ' ~ , Existing Zoning: sr' / Date established: Z , Zone Change File No.: dverti sed Zone Upgrading : A# , Number of Lots: Location: Section ~ Townshi Rangeq ~ ~ PE- j ~ Co~ Plat File No. : l~ Q Plat Name : ~