The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1092-77 ~ AGENDA, APRIL 15, 1977~ ~O~~'LEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SP OKANE COU\TTY PLANNING COMMISSION ` TimQ: (PLEASF NUTE DATE CHANGE) Friday, April 15, 1977, 9:30 A.M. Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) P$ELJNI`UAgy STTBDTVISTn1~Z AND ZOIVE CL.A,SSTFfC;ATION TTP-GA~_D--T1~TC; 4. PE-1 092-77, MissiQn RidgeAdditiorl Z.E- 59-77, Aqricultural to $lja,ale FamiJ,y Re,siderWal and/or Two-Familv -Resident~al a, Location: Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44,E.W.M. The South 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 9, except Fauser's Addition, also except the East 25 feet of the South 165.23 feet. b. Sponsor: Mrs. Roy Heggem Ea s ti 11318 - 2 S th Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineers : Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 d. Site Size: 2.5 Acres e. Number of Lots : 6 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Duplexes g, Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established April 24, 1942 h. Advertised Zone Upgrading: Single Family Residential and/or Two-Family Residential i, Water Source: Modern Electric Water Company j. School District: East Valley School District k. Environmental Imnact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact, lE r'J"Jt I ~~.cf rr x 1~ ~ \i e1 j i J r J ~ ~I ~l ii •Ia n ~ ' .w u ~ " 3 `In • t 4 e 1 ^~T•:.=~r. ,sss Ih'I~.. JI ~ waeis~. y~.e 1 : ..:L:~:ES x n ~ O♦ ~ t ' L ~ ' ~ .._.r ~ a 1' 2 i - _ i ~ ~'~i ~r - +iesOr J y w L Ya\N'r i s't ~t = ~ ° ~ _ ~ y y:.• ~ - ' .V l r~y YM1!ll ~V.tO Z~_~~1 < 3 { •J' IS •!1 t ~Cr ~ ~ O~`_ r• ~GS.I7 AvC • .-s . roc., jr' ~_3 Ti'~,y', , ' ..1 , o CA .W a ~L' 17 P ~ 4.Y.L~9_ : ~-ir ii.~ T:-I Ea 21 ~ I ' f - ~*Q/' * • . ~ ~n}Jb... ~ • VV~~ • ~ X e~r- r • ~f"1 '2e~~wi.r .~La. ♦.KI .Wt 6 ~ _ ~ ```t 3 ` ~ ~ _ f-z nt Je. • s ~\lCv w4v ~J-.. M i . r . ~ .r0.. _ e I . ~!1 - , ~ ~ - • j'~ ~ .r' ~ ♦T fT - -4- L-Ufi AREA 5TA1I-aTICS _FOR* f4LS5I0h RlDGE ACD Cd./10/77 BLriCK 1 AREA = 6S'4C79 SQ FT ( litC ACRES) ACCUfo AREA = 6g"9O?. 5C FT t 1.6C ACRES1 DIFFEREiVCE: m 1. 5Q FT GROSS i}ENSITY: 2 LCTSIACRE NET DENSI71f: 4 LCTSIACRE LARGEST LDTt 12453. 5o FT SMIAILEST ~GT: 11.J31. 5O FT AVERAGE LOfiz 11651. 5Q FT A OF LOT S: 6 ~ S G ~ ~ 0 I.L V ~ L ~ ' ~ . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ \ . .,r-. ~ 77 1331 NOo BEFCRE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ? y ? ) ) ~11 TiE AMr4Tfis Qli- OLLkN01ING TH:P, ZOidIXr :30F ) 1~1.,•~'`i t~G,s-11CIfLTLJE.I~'s1u `.i Q T~°~`} .wARf.kLY 11ES1.1J1'NTIlfL ) .c;ti~Pr'~?~ '~,`►`~.5~ 113 :1~C'':[ON 9 e`i~iWN5UIP 25N.)s R E S 0 L U T I 0 N CAA~GE 44, &R~'.AiIL C:"lt.s~3TY, WASx{INGTEH. ~ ) ) - ) The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice of the hearing on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required; and that the said Planning Commissior concur8 in the plan to zone the following described property as: T'G :.+A" ILY 7;3%'10:~T1AL 5 y~ o~ ~W 34 oi SW 34 o_+: ~W 34 of Sect. 9. except Faaserf a Additian, o.lw except the E 25 it of S 145.25 it., locate3 in 3ectiun y. Towas'hio 25 rj. • RC-ange 44, E. w.m. Spokane Eounty. WashinSton. All that area platted as Missian Ridge Addition Section 9, TownshYp 25 N., Raage 44, E.W.M. IVOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the abovE-described property be, and the same hereby is zoned under the classification of TWq FAMZLy RrZTDg~ITIpL as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amendedo PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF , 19ZZ ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON VERNON ~WP ~ OHLAND . - f?. ~ , C. erk,.o f the Bo,ar;d~" ' - . , i3' F . ' , • .~G i, t . ' By• ` ` ~ O • ~ Deputy v 1ERRY C. KOPET, CHM. . This is to certif that this is a . tARN true arid correct~dy-i~31 ' . Resolution Noo passed by Board this Z47 , day of , 19 . oe- By: _ _ Deputy I hereby certify that I have posted the above changes and rzvisions on the Zoning Map in the Building Codes Department, and do further certify that the zone classification change is the same as described above and shown on the attached mapo SIGNED: DATED: 0 ZONE CHANG£S POSTFD ON ZG, NG. MAPS: ~ , I tlpplication No. ZC-59- 77 Res..No. _-77" /33/ Res. Date.// 7- 77 I . From: To: ~a ~o i . ~ ~ Posted ByDate Poste.d: f r"2-72-77 Acre s : Sec. Range -~jl ~4/ EAST ~ ~ 1A(} . ~ . t ~ ~ _ 1 ":p~ _ . .r,. (Wail Map) Building Codes, De.,partmen Sca1e... 1 00 r (UVall Map) Front Uffice Sca-le=: 1" - 100"0' - ~ ~ ~-'r~ (UV.all Map) M-iddl'e Office 'ScaTe : 1" - 10.0'0' ~ (Section, Maps) Front 'Office' Scale: 1" - 4:00' ~ ~t _ ~ _(File MaD~) Tracing. #34 (Valley Zoning M~ap) Scale ; . 1 100.Q4 , _ . 4~ . (File Map) iVletro #11 (Director's Off-icO -Scale-: 1" - 2000' - - w~~-~ (File Map) County - Front Office Sca1e: ~1 1-mile , . ~ „(F.ile Map) County.(Map ;Room) Scale,:- 1 - .2 fn iles I .(Score. C-ard) ~1Vlidd:le Offfce. U 'S.OUTK. EAST _ (`IVaIl Map) Building Codes Department Scale:- 1-' -100:0' (b11z.11 .Map) Tront c7fficP 'Scale: 1 " - 101'00' (W:.*11 ;Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - '10'0'0-' (Se ction. Maps ) Fr.ont Off ice: Scale : 1"- 4 0 Ci' (Fi:lRe Map) Tracing #34 (So.trf.h East Zoning: Niaps.) Scale: 1000" ~ (Fi l`: Map) Metro 411 (,Directors Officel 'Scale: 1" - 2.000` (Filei M-AO County-Fr-ont -Office Scale: '1" - 1 mile (Fi1e~ M4p) County (Mep Ro:om) "Sca,le: 1" '2 miles(Sc'ore -Cardsl Middle.. Office No ~:096 BEF'OPE ~THF : }3QA:P.ll 0r 'r ,GUN'tY. :~~IMI aNT' :S GF SPrJ'f:ANE C,flUr:`'~~ N,e ' PE-1092-77 ) ITJ THE N.A= OI' MIY1G TIM I'IY3AL. PTrAT Q1' MIsSIQN RIm.; ,LOGATFAD IN ) SECTIOId 9 o TOI~JIJSHIP 25N.11 RAI3(3E 44, jR E. S.0 L`U 'T I n-N E.W.M. SPOKANE, C4iTNTY, VJAMIIi(3TOI3. 1 ) RE 1:T 'RE SM ~ BY THE, i34A~ '0+ C:OZTIV lY C714I41_aSIOY!IMS OF' -~FOI~~AI`iL ~,OU1~I'~Y, '~iASIIII~iGi0ri , Vhat;-tI1E ~inal plat of - MI&5I0N RT= '8 1/2 0f SW 14 of SI-I 14 of SW 34 of Secto 9, Except P'aueOe's Adcli,tion, a].so excdpt the E 25 flt o¢' S'i 65023 ft, alocated in Section 9 o Tomshi p 25 fil, 9 8ange 44, E.U.N. Spmkana Count,y. Uaehingtono more pre.ca.sely describDd in the plat d?dication, on the: recommendation of the 'SgokanL County Pl.aru-dug 'Co►~n1:i:ssion, be-, and the sa.rne hereby ?.s - approved-, ti•rith the exception that the public r-ights of wa;y .clccdi_cGte~1' in this plat will not be ~stabl~.sY►ed :ior mai..n.tenannc.e ;,Purpo_ses until the Cq.unty E~i~;ineer- has cer.tifie:d: that the roads have U~ezn impro:vecl t'o County st:andards and b;Pp?7o:ve:d. by aseparatL re'solu'tior_ o,f the Bo~r~l .of Courity Gominissianer:so ~ DAY OF' t 1 g PASSED, BY TH.E BOAR13 THIS . J _ 7 BQAkD OF COtJNlY, CO" ISSIOIdER~'.S QF SPOICAN-b COIIIdTY, LIASHINGTOh. ~ i 1ERRY C. KOPEL CNM. NA$~RV.. M. LARN, . RAY 'CNRISTEN~DSEW ~ A TTEST': V-EFZNON W e ND ;C~lcrk he Boaa~r 3'y : . ~ 1 'J . a v . • v. ' ~ PaClf IC N01'thweSt BelI ~ l . ~ a . ~ Spokane, August 2., 1977 - : 1T, . . !1 , ,t ; , SFokane. Count.y .Planning Corrnission, ~ tlorth 811 Jefferson Street ~ ~ S-pokarc, t•!ashingtan 0201 • ► . , - Jear Sirs• ; . . Tiie Uti:1 i ty easements: shom on tfie rINAL pl at of . ' - i the_*MiSSI4v RIDGE ADDITiON zwe satlsfactors/ to the Paci fi c Northwesic 6e "111 1'e-1ep'rwne Compaiy. - . - - . . ~ G. R. F 1 eming Ri_ght=of~Way Agent . . . ~ North 904 Co.l umb.us Str•eet ' , - Spokane, tilashin9tvn 9:9202 . . ' , GDF:nf . . cc: Clar.ence E. Simpson Engrs.,-Inc. . North 909 Argonne Road : - Spokane, Washing.ton 99206 , o - . 1 1 1Oct L. M~W "Serving the OPPO.RTUPlITY* AREA for Ove:r 60 Years" , . Telephone 928-4540 Box 14008 -10ppoNunity Brdnch Spokttne, Washingion 99214 '~lfR CO . ~ _ ..s AugU$t g, z~~-T rred S. Daytiarsh, Pixe:cror SPokane Cpunty i'la,nn'in'g ,Cvrnmi.ss:ioLT 811 Jeffer.son. Spcakan.e,, WasYifng,ton 99201. Uear Nfr . Day h.ar-sh,: Regatcl:iia'g Rid'ge' Addittigw, Modern Eleet-ric lJaf:e.r Cornpany would ap,pi:eciate, a 10 f,oo.t `u.Li-lity eas:ement alnng tbe sou,th po:rtion' of I3lock 1, Mi-ssion. =Ridoe Addifton., a p1a`t in a, portiAn of SW 't- cif StJ it- of Sec tion 9, T' 25 N, A 4-4 ,E-.-W. M, , Sp-ot%ane Caun t"`y, Washingt..dn. AtEachec3 en,cloSUr,e sketc~h il.lustrates our reque.st. Si:h.cexely,; Ar,t Kee ler Aat*er Superiarendent, AK :.ms: cc: Clare.n:ce S:impson, 'Cngirieers, :L•n.c. _ -IE E, C ~ AUG 11 '1917 S P Q K A~I.~ PLAN N I,N~ ~D~~P~;~Y~~NT e . , ~ . - • ~ • ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ SEC9 5 1 No ~ ~ ' ` . ~Ga~la.,1 - 440 ~ A r •a 351~ ~ / ~ ' ` ~ ~i 5 ~ ~ ~ . i s 1~ . • . ~ -3 { ~ \ c~ • , . ! ry.~' ri 1 F'~' ' ~ ~ ; i"'b'~. N4t ` , ~ ' ~ "-k • _ - -_...~3~a"" 6 $ , r ~,~t 1 3 4 A ' ► . ~z Iy ` y -.-s--~"'R.~, l .~1i6iti..-~~.,,• ` ~ W . ~ i ~ ~ A}'~ >>s. . y~~. ' ,p~' , • ;i, 1'~I -~r.~ ' ' '("''ti T~~1'1 , ~ t y'~r~a. r -i ~ .R~~~ , - ~ ' ;1' t ' ..;-;-.~i~~`W.~~ 1: . . _ .,~~t •i~ ~.~.__.,,y._„' v:~ ',~~,~'..C ~•.j:' . • ~1 ~ .~M+ :l•' . 1 ~ . T ` ~j " ~ . . , f- • ~ ' i . i.~. . rr-~- • ~ ' .•r: ry, ~ , _ 1- : ~.~u- tN• ~o~t~ - . : .:~:.r.}♦,~~~:-n-~:: . ~1 ~ Ar~ ~ i ~--~-r`., r""1. 7.Y~ . J _ _ / y , .t'J::.~: : . i . ~ ~ + -~r.'.•.'.'. •~l', _ ~ ♦ l~`l ' _ ~ ~ . . 4 ~ ~i ts a ~ ~ _ ~ ~-1--f- _ ~ . ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ^ t :'S: ~ . ~ - ~ t~-'~4..-~""'~ ~ ~~~~~2.3~~ 4~+ 1' . ;a 0 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ I, . r ~ • 5 Lj~rTt~r . _ ..--~5~ Qi. ~ f M . . S O o ` } ; ~ r .~.p • r._. • i p)i ~ : si9 ,~l ~ 1 ' i ~ ~ ~a 31' ~ 1!♦ ~ ~tr ~ ~sw } ♦ Eyay'._..l_~ . •+g4 Q~ 83 ~ 1~~ ~ It 5L 52 f4 B(s lLT 1 * ~ _ ' ~ ` •1 a5 ~ i~ , ~ y ~ ~ ~ 53 ~ . ♦ ~ ~ ` r S q i„p (sl M ~ '{N~ e 7 -c<' ~.58 % ~ N , • • ~ ~34'9 I , n , . a ~ ' ~ f'` + ~ 1 j , , j tp 91 ~-9?.~; o z ~ 430 } ,av t i r~u~vs~A r~__'~ ~ ',~As~M~,r~1't"' ~ Q~ , 95 ~ goC, ~,C, 1.. . r 9~ . ~ 57 ~r' , - ! Z ' , e~g JC,,.f ~ • ~ ' ~ ~ e t s ~ _ tr. r J 7 : !/1.►~---~►'~l.G''~1O - ~ ~ r-1 6 FINAL PLAT CHECK LI I 1. Final Plat Leroyed 2. Subdivrsion name 3. Section, township & range 4. Sponsor(s) name (s) 5. Engineer or surveyor 6. Sheet size 24" X 36" 7. North point, scale (100' - 1" or 2 00' - 1 8. Boundary Line 9. Location & widths of proposed streets, alleys, rights of way, easements, parks, open spaces,& proper labeling of spaces to be dedicated to the public 10. Layout & names of adjoining subdivisions a. Replats - Layout & Name of the replat shall be shown by dashed lines 11. Street names - consistent with existing streets in city and county. - Check aqainst names on round name wheel. 12. Lot sizes - i.e., 80' X 125' with 10, 000 sq. ft. for single family lot Cul De Sacs - 80' at building line 13. Layout, numbers, and dimensions of lots & parcel s 14. Necessary engineering data 15. Does dedication state if individual water and/or public sewers will be provided in accordance With preliminary plat of approval. 16. Notarized certification by a professional land surveyor. . 17. Private re strictions , if any 18. Number and type of units 19. Dedication of streets to the public 20. Easement verification & illustration 21. Check easements, clouds on property, etc. from Title Report > 2r C~ 4~►21~c. 1 ~ iL ~ • c.Ncc~ C~~"' L C~ , C ~ ~s J _ ~ ATICOR COMPANY Pioneer National Title Insurance Company WEST 521 FIRST AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99210 • TELEPHONE (509) 838-5281 CHARLES U ANDERSON ~ VICE PREStDENT AND COUNTY MANAOER t REPORT FOR PLAT CERTIFICATE Proposed Plat Of: Mission Ridge Addition Refer To: C-114971 Spokane Count,y Planning Commission CC: Clarence Simpson Engineers North 811 Jefferson North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99201 This is a report as of July 21, 1977, at 8:00 A.M., covering the following property: The South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 9, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, EXCEPT Fauser's Addition, and EXCEPT the East 25 feet of the South 165.23 feet. Record title is vested in P. R. Heggem and Eris Heggem, his wife as to the East 135 feet of the South half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter, except the South 165.23 feet, and except the North 50 feet; and Eva J. McGee, as her sole and separate property, as to the remainder. SUBJECT T0: l. Contract of Sale Vendor : Eva J. McGee as her sole and separate property Vendee : P. R. I-Ieggem and Eris Heggem, his wife Dated : June l, 1977 Recorded : June 8, 1977 Auditor's No. : 7706080303 Receipt No. : 157771 2. For easements, restrictions and other exceptions, see Schedule "B-1" attached. continued ~ - Report for Plat Certificate Page 2 C-114971 NOTES: 1. General and weed taxes for 1977, in the respective sums of $74.78 and $0.10, are paid in full. (Assessor's Parcel No. 09543-9038) 2. Inquiry should be made as to any unpaid charges by Modern Electric Water Company. This report shall have no force or effect except as a basis for the certificate applied for. PIONEER NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Spokane County Office Authorized Signatory RCP/dm t • ~ z SN14 s SW14 S4:f bc. T&I ~ 3 0 /70 ~ 130 O 0 . a 0 ~ „o ~ o ~qG ~ ~ 170 /30 ~ ~ . o J 30 , ' O A aD oN ~dvs,~~e s . Yo / ¢ . , ~ .1. - - - - - - - v3r~]~'- .~.sa ~r►ays~.' M M/SS/ON The Comnary has net surveyed the premisPs SkvtchM. ~ The skntr_h bei. vo is Furni;hrG without charge solely Ior tht purpc:s.• ~r ot I:,c31irR V+►Q premisfs and ihe Corstpany aswmes r,,- Lility fUr inILWraLi: I?s?rpi:i It Aies n.•t purp.;.t to show AlL 1110hways, roads arrd t,,,emerits :iri;.,ir,in}: -?r atle~.ii!;g ~eid premises. E. n(_ V ~ N11Ss iUPJ RIUUl AUU{ (-IUlJ ^ ` SCfIEDIJLE "B-1" 1. R I GHTS OF IqAY FOR D I TCf4ES AND P I PE L I NES , PROV I DED FOR I N COPJTRACT DATED NOVEMaER 4, 1()05, 4dITH MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY, RECORDED I N VOI.UME "E" OF CONTRACTS, PAGE 267 R E C E I V E AU G 2 4 1977 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT _ ...1NUTES APRIL 15, 1977 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING, PE-1092-77 - MISSION RIDGE ADDITION: HEGGEM ZE- 59-77 - AGRICULTURA.L TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND,/OR TWO ' FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Planning Commission Decision: Approve. subiect to the findinQS and conditions as listed below: (Vote was 'unanimous.) A. FIIVDINGS: 1. The proposed subdivision is located within the Spokane Metropolitan , Area. Specifically, the proposal is located in the Spokane Valley and I north of 1Vlission Avenue and'East of University Road. I 2. Mission Ridge Addition is situated within an area designated as suitable for residential development by the approved map of the Park and Recrea- tion Element of the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and its accomp- anying text. The Comprehensive Plan for the Spokane Metropolitan Area, , as approved by the Spokane Regional Planning Conference, also desig- , nates the area as a residential neighborhood. Boundaries of said neigh- borhood are University to the west, Sprague to the south, Pines to the east, and Interstate 90 to the north. I 3. The applicant requests preliminary approval for the subdivision of appro- ximately 2.5 acres into six (6) lots for duplexes; thereby creating a gross density of about five (S) units per acres. 4. The lots in the proposed subdivision have been designed to accommodate either single family dwellings or duplexes with a typical lot size of 11,500 square feet and a typical lot frontage of 100 feet. 5. The proposed subdivision appears to be a compatible extension of exist- ing development in the area. Development to the south of the proposal i includes Fauser's Addition, Fields Addition, Maxwell Subdivision and Marion Addition; while development to the west includes jEnney's sub- division and Valley Vista Subdivision. Located to the east of the pro- po sal is the Spokane County Valley iVtis sion Park. 6. The site in question is currently vacant and the USDA has classified• its cropland potential as fair e 7. Public facilities and utilities are available within the area to serve the proposed subdivision to the following extent: A. Water and Power : Modern Electric Water Company states that "upon completion of satisfactory arrangement with the Modern Electric Water Company, the utility is capable of providing water for domestic use and fire protection, and eiectricfty for residential consumption." _t~- ~ ~ I PE-I-_~S2-77 - N'IISSIOiv RIDCE ADDITIC3hl (Cont'd.) B. Sewage Disposa1: The site in Ruestion is locatEd over the aquifer that cErvE^ both the Cdy of Spo'~-ane and Spo',ane Valley. The Spo- i:arr County HeaJth Districc has approved the proposed subdiv- sion for on site sewage dispo5a1. The District states "the topography ancl soils in the plat, are wuitable for installation of individual on-sitE sewage disoosQi systems. Such sy-ctems will have negligible i.nmediate impact on the environment in the area but continued urbanizatton in the area at this density hisCorically pollijtes grounuwater under the development at so:nE time in the future e" C a Schools: The proposed subc:ivis:on liEs wifihiri the bounderies of the East Valley School Di.Stricta The Di.si:ricti's facilities arE cur- rently at capacii,y levels and any increasE in student enroll- ment wi'1 have to be absorbed by present faciiities until their current builc?ing prograrri is completed in two or three years . D. Par;cs: The Spo'cane County Valley Mzssion Park is located to the east of the propo-sEdo The County Par'~.L- department has no present planw for future site acquiEition or major irnprovements in LLhE area. E. JIDo!ice Protection: The Spok-ane County Shc-riff's Department has been contacted ano nQ comment nas been received regarding this proposal. F o Fire Protection: SpokanE County Fire Protection District #1 haa been contactEC' anc the District States hydrants need to be installeci to prflvide ilor adeRuate fire protection e G. Roads: Adequate county roadc- appear to be available at the site to handle the increased. traffic -iY thE proposal is approved. The Spo'.:ane Regiona? PIdI:ning Confcrence's adopted transportation plan has designaced both Universsity Road and TViission Avenue as princioal arteria? ~ , The s taff o¢ the Flanning Depart.-rEnt ha s reviewed the environmental chECk- list as submittecl by the applicant, an~3 the staff rECO1r_mends that adeclar- ation of non-significance be issue-' o If the Plannina Com. mis-cion ieeJ.s approval of this proposal would bE appropriate, the department c-taff recom~mendc the ¢ol ovving conritions: ia ThaL the plat be de~igned as inc.ic~.~tEO on the revised preliminary plat of record and/or attachEd sheers as notedo 2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one c?welling structure be placecl on any or.e lot, nor shall any lot be further .A tv , subdivided for the purposes oi crezting G6ditional lotz or building sites without filing a replat. Tnat the plat provide for right of tn~ey wic'.th for streets as indicated on the preliminary plat of rccord. That appropriate provision be made that the followina described property be held in trus tuntil the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or Edges of a11 streets that terminatE or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul dE sacs arE rcquirEd wheii streets terminate at the plat boundaries. ) 5. That appropriate street names bc in~.~icated. 6. That appropriate utility easements bc indicatEd on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department anci the utility comnanies. Written approval of the Easements by the utility ccmpany must be received prior to the subrnittal of the final plat. 7. That a plan for w-3ter facilities adequatE for fire protection bc- app:oved by the water supplier and fire protec'tion districte 5aicl water plan must al,o have beEn aaproved by the 3ppropriate heal.th cauthorities. The health authorities, water supplier (purvEyor), and firE protection district will certify, prior to the filing of thE final plat, ofl the face of s3id water plan that the plan is in conformance with Lhcir rcattirements and will adequately satisfy their respective necds. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitaL'c for re-proauction. The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan that -appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in 3ccordance with the approvEd plan, and in accorc~ance w-th a timE schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for com.pl.etion of the water system and inspection by the Gppropriare health authoritics prior to application for building permits within the plat. The contraccu.-I1 rarrsngcments will include a provisron holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchasc-r refused ;a buiic3ing pErmit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to : atisfactorily complEfte the approved water system. The plat dedication will coiZtGin a -statement to the effect that the public wuter system as approved by County an(f State Heaith authorities and the local fire district and purveyor will be insta)led within this plat, and the subdividEr will provi-de for indivi:-_~u a1 ciomestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior tc salE of Each lot. 8. That a certificatc of titlc be furriishEd the Planning Department prior to the filing of the fiizal p1aE. 9. That the preliminary plat be given condition al approvul to Niay 1, 19178. , / ~ _ . PE-1092-77 - MISSION -RIDCE ADDITIOIV (Cont'd) 10. That a declaration of Non-Signizicance be issued, in accordance with Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval of this recommendation by the Board of County Commissioners, or that any approving action of the Board be conditioned• upon issuance of Final Declaration of Non-Significance in accordance with SCEO 11. 15.340. 11. That a name be indicated before the final plat is fiied; such name to be approv ~ ed by the County Assessor and the Planning staff. 12. The Spokane County Health District has determined that the soil conditions in the plat are suitable for on-site sewage disposal systems on each lot. 13. No more than two dwelling units per lot shall be permitted; an on-site manage- ment system shall be approved by the Health District. 14. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engineer o 15 e That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to thE County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a fina: plat. 16 o That drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and align- ment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. 17. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be per- formed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the locatian of survey monuments which may be disturbed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improve- ments were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construc- tion plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced. 18. No construction work is to be performed with the public right of way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspec- tion and 3pproval by thE County Engineer. 19. All construction with in the public right of way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the Couniy Engineer to cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 20. Upon the filing of the final plat, upgrad Mission Ridge Addiiion to the Two Family (R-2) Residential Zone clas sification . (Cont' d), -13- \ . PE-1092-77 - 1ViISSION RIDGE ADDITON (Cont'd) C . GEIVERAL DATA: , 1. Location: Section 9, Townshfp 25 N., Range 44, E.V1%. N! . S 1/2 of SVIf 1/4 of SW 1/4 of SW 1/4 of Sect 9, except Fauser's Addition, also except the E 25 ft of S 165 . 2 3 ft. 2. Sponsor: . Mrs. Roy Heggem E. 11? 18 Sth Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 Engineers: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 4. Site Size: 2.5 acres 5. Number of Lots 6 6. Land use proposed by sponsor: Duplexes 7. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established April 24, 1942 8. Advertised Zone Upgrading: Sinqle Family Residen±ial and/or Two Family Residential ~ 9. Water Source: Modern Electric Water Company 10. School ristrict: East Valley SchoAl ristrict 11. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environment- a1 impact. 14 - 0 - L ; • . kt ~ ~ + r• ir r r ' , 4~' ' ` , l I ~ I ~ ~ ~ , ~ Y 7i' SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS BUIIDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STqEET PMONE 458-2274 ' SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 89201 •i . SPOKANE COUNT~COUR7HOUSE MEMORANDUM T o: S CbK. Co. p 1 ST. . Ac'T7j: ENVtA., UrzAtT* D I vo 31 oN F RO M: S pokane County Planning Department N. 811 jefferson, Spokane, WA 99201 Attention: ~Q 0~ $ DATE: R E F E R E N C E: Attached Propo sed Declaration of Npn-Significance and Environmental Checklist for ZF 69 .'17 Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be one of jurisdiction, WAC 197-10-040 (4). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your right to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advi e~h t theproposal was listed in the SEPA Public Information Center on , ` t > , ' f ~ _t ! = t ' ' I ``•1 - \ 'IN~ ~ C iCi J ~ ~ ` ♦ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ;~~j _ ~ i PUBLIC WORKS BUtLDING N. 611 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2274 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 SPO+tANE COUhTY COURT HOUSE LEAD AGENCY DESIGNATION OF SPOKANE COUNTY Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a dfvision of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, i s the LEAD AGENCY for the following de scribed proj ect: The following is explanation for this determfnatfon: • • WAC. t°I? `(a-Z-Zo Determination for Spokane County By: Name: ~0~ 6EVAeos Titl e: Rl.Qa ArDWA) tST~,.,~ Date: Jr,61f-77 .l C ~ _S' . ~ 1 • - _ ~ .7 DEPT. FILE REF. ' ,~r•~1~ ~ u ' ~ ~ u,'IF ~j ~ . -`R'.•-".'` STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checkli t a d a pertinent dat has subsequently been reviewed by the $ Tadpitionpq , M-Krt The following data briefly describes the proposal: l,w~u,w' c.~► ~~v+.2y ~u~#2~+ A. Action Requested: P~ (CA 0~ eff ro)q i" B. Description of roposal: . / ~ V+t~ ~O ~ S ~ ~U e~1c,eS r C Locatzon of Proposai. Avw, ~ C~ruu~L ~ ~ II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse i acts are noted under the followin questions: ~ , L t2 Z ~t- 3 ~ ~ ~ orz. 5 `~wka _ . ~ ~."°~s~~ 7-`~ ~ aw,1 8 u~~ 9 rc.~~ ll a~ l2 Q6"Cv l ~ ~ . ~ L :-t ( tJVer) B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: C. Discussionaf. impacts identifieci above: ~IIL~ III. Conclusions and Recommendatfons: ~ 4z-~ ~ I3ased on Iand C above, the staff t cu cd ~ ~ Ue.x~- ~ c~~►~ c~ ~ 194e. ISSw I ~ , , SEP" PIC REF. 4 ` THRESHOLD DETERMINATIOIv . . ~ t~ DECL~aR~;TIc7t~ 01- ; ro osed/final ~P P ) ~ref T:~.•wr `1~1 ~ ~ C l~ " s ~ • t l ~ t + ' _ . • . _ v~Ji/ 4~) r w ~ (significance/no ignlficance) . , 49 1. Doscripcion of P,o~,osal: ~~-UJr'',~C~ ~ C~• ~ 7-► 5 ~ ~ C~~ l.~ {o r~' ~~.~~i? `-?7 ~vtc . ~ _ ? N 2~ ! ~ ~ +r1.~S . Pro3onent: 3. Con:ac[ Person: ~ Z Phone; 9 ~ I r 3. C'oun Action(s) Requested: ,al'' .a L catio . o n ot Proposa . ~ tA, -41(o_ V ~ Lead AqF:n:•y: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This propasal has been determined to have a significaiit adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43 . 21C , 030(2) (c) This -_iecision was made after review by the County of a completed environmPntal checl:list and oth- r informa~to~n on file with the lead agency. . Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: (na me ) _f&2 (na me) jFQ. ~ %,e 7~ s atur ature) IDM -4 (riue) D t P.EC.ToGZ cicl Ck4%ov gjAtar`c (depc.) PLANhll N& (deacJ BD. Qf . C.O. r-titiitii . da e -2 d a t ~ . D?partmc-:nt Reference No.: p~ -oc Z -~7 (See Reverse Side) ~ 7. For Daclaracions of Sfgnificance Only: Date of Expected D-aft EIS Availability (determined by Rosponsible Offictal) Date Entered !n "EI5 in Preparation RPgister" (determined by SI;PA Public Information Cpnter) To be completed by respnnsible official: a. Brief description and listinq of those en•,ironmental impacts leading to such declaration: b. Brief explanation of what measures, if any could be taken by the appllcant to pre- vent or mitigate the environmental impac:t of tfie proposal to such an extent that the responsible offictal couid consider a revlsed proposal with a possible re- sulting declaration of nonsignificance: g, For E,EQuosed Declarations of Nonsiqnificance Only: Date Entered "Proposed Dec2aration of 1Vonsignificance Register" (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) Date commr-_nts to be received (1 S day review period) (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) 9. SEPA Public Information Center: (For departments of General GovernmenE only) ( ) Approved as to form ( ) Disapproved as to form Reasons: Siqnature of SEPA PIG Offtcer; Date: r 1 . . ' 'r•d 7M]MAnC COU►T CCU+` MC'~7C EINVIRONMEr,:'I'~'~L C;HEC;KLI>T Introduction: The State Environmental Polfcy Act of 1911 ,Chapter 43,21C, RC'.'►', requires all state and local gavernmental agencfes to consider environmental vaiues both for their owri actions and when 1lcensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. Th - purpose of thfs checklist is to help the agencies involE►ed dptermine w}7`ther or not s proposal !s suc1: :,i :n.ijc;r action, P1Gase answer khe following quest3ons as ccmpl::tely as yuu can wicl-i the in?artnation presently avai2able to yau. Please answer questions as "yes" or "rnaybe" if, in you:- opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will bc~ aware of and concern themselves with the deqr@e oi imoact, asking you for more infr-.rm.:- tion, ff necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation woUld be helpful [o qovernment decision-makers, include your explana[ion ln the space provicied, or use additional pa es, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or s[udies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the ansH►ars you provide. Complete answers to these questfons now will help all aqencies involved with your proposal Fn underta'r,e the required envimnmental review without unnecessary delay. The followinq questions apply to you: total propusal, not just to the licEnse for whic:; you are currently applyfng or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even thouqh completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of [he agencies which will be involved to complete their environment.al review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until [he checklist has been completod and returnec: to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist, The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" anscve*s, and in som(- casf-s, mnrP detailed information to aid in a threshold determinatio1l. NOTE: This is a standdrd form being used by all state and local aqencies in the Scate of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. R E C E I V E MaR 14 1977 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. BACKGROUND l . Name of Propanent: A' ; ; - 2. Ac3dress and Phone Number of Proponent: ~ / ^ %~l f,'~l` - - ~ • ; ` _ j . .(7 3. D•3[e Checklist Submitted: .3-~~~ 4. Agency Requirinq Checklist: 5nnka ne County, 'JVa t 5. Nam.-! of Proposal, if Applicable: - ~ - ~ ~ b5 Z-~I 7 (IF SPACE FOR EXPL~NAT'IOIv IS IPvADEQUATE, PLEASE AT'I'ACH t`%M_)ITt()NAL Pr%GES.) b. Nature <ind E3rte: D2sci-iptian ai tf:e Pr1__)Pvs?1 (i:1r-iU-J1Mg r,oc li;`.i tD i!-S. size, general design elements, and other thac %v:s' qivc ~ir..cu:.3c~ uncier- standinc: of i~s, scope and nature): Y . r ! ~ ~ 4`•-L• V ' t , /Y 1.1 ~7. ~r ' ~ Q_ : f~t t /~1 ? 'A • ~ f-. r , . ; 7. Location of Proposal (~~sr;::bc CiiZ Dr1ySlCal set~ing ai t'-te propt~s_:1, ~s ~n•ell as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an aeeurake understandinc: of r.h^ sn.cinq of the proposal) : -,~i 1'•'~ r ~~~'f ~,i,~c.. i.•!`'L-'~ _ . ~ %l~1..fi ~ ~ . ~,t~.> ~~'1~--4-vU'I.e+ ~~L-~'~' . , L~'~~ ~7~~ ~ .,L--'cl `1-Y..~'~h.w' ~~.t,ct~ t~. .''~,~•w~ 'R !i~,' ~ ~ ~ f ~ . _ . ~z-~-Af' tiv'-e~X •L¢~t L~~t:', ~ ~~40 - ,t_[,~~ ,c.r..' c~.~ "t, ~..~,y ` -s ~,~,..e c.~{' ~s• Z,`!!-~(i1.~ 8. Estimated DatP for Completion of the Proposal: iveniment 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and Iocal - including re:zones): ' . , ~ . ' . . . . , ~rr ~ i 10a. Do you,or the owner tn the event you do not own the subject land, have any ~ p1an5 for future additions, axpanslon, or fucther activity relaced to or con- nected wlth this proposal? If yes, explain: ~ lOb, Do ypu own or ha:►e opttons ort ?sncl rt...:rbr or adjac:o~;A tc, thts propcsal's location? If yes, explain: r ~ D 11. Da you know of any plans ry others lncluding the owner which may affect thc rroperty covere::l hy ycur proposal or lJind adjacent or nearhy:' I` ye,:, c_~xplaic,: / 1 12. Attach any otlier applicaLion fo:r,t Clc:l; has i>•?en contulNted regatriing [he pr,:•posal; if none has been completed, but is expecteci to be filed at some future date, dr~s(-ribe the natur,,_ of sucs: applic.1cic~n fo=.rTl: II. E~.'VIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of aIl "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Ml;)ybr v::, 1, Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcoverinq of the soil ? , . . . , . , . . . . . , . . . , , ~ 0 ~ ' - ? - 00 (IF SF'°ACE F'CJ'R EXPLAPrAT'ION IS I':~~ADEQLTATE, PLEASE A'1'TACH ADDITIOI~,~AL PAG.FaS.) Yes Maybe No (c) Change in topography oa- ground surf,-ice i-elief ft-atures ? (d) "~~e destructa.on, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . , . . , . . , k/- (e) An}r incr'ease in w#nd +~r water erosion of soils, ei'ther on ~~f tli,'r ~'Jite? • P e e r ■ . . . • s . s . . ~ Changes in deposfkion or erosi:carr of beach sands, or changes in silCatfon, deposltion or erosion which m-ay modify the channe1 of a rfv+er or stream or the bed of the ocean or any ~y~, ia~let ~►r lake~' r a . . . . . Exp1.anati on . ~ 2. Air. W~~ the graposal resuit in: (a) Air emissians or deterloration o€ ambient air quality`:' . . . (b) The creation of objectionable odors ? . . . . . . . . , (c) Alteratfon of air maverrseritr rnoi~Lute or temperature, or arty change in climate, either locally or rec~i+anaIlgr'? , . . ' A-~ ExPlana tion: _ ~`~•~r~~~~ c. - _ ~ ~ 3, Watcr-, V.'J1l the propf}sal r c s u1a: in: (a) Charzge in currents, or the course or c3irection ot water movezrrents, in either marine or fresh water-s (h) C'hanges in absorptlcrn rates, drainage patCerns, vr the rate and amount af surface water runaff ? , . . . . . (c) A].terations tcs the cou,;se or flow° c~f flaad waters ? (d) Change in the amoxant of surface water In any water I ~~y?#*. • r s .0 . s r a r • o• f ■ . . . (e) D'.scharge into suzface vkraters, or in any alkeration of s-i4~AaL4 'lIY`atei q414Yl:LlyI i16cl.4iLAing 0.afu4 YJot lifiJiteW1 Eo teG"k"I~,~.Uratllre, diS~~lved olCsf'ge11 C7~~ turbid1t'f? . , , . . (f) Alteration of tt~e directfon or rate of flot+v of ground waiers ? s • ! i s a 0 • ■ a w s • • : - . (c~) Change ira the quantity of ground waters, ei[her through direct additions or withd~awals, or through interception of an aqulfer by ct.tCs ar excavaitfons? . . . . . . . . (h) Deeeriorativn fn ground water qua1ity, either thrvugh d3recL injection, or through the seepage of leachatef phospates, detergents, water6ome virus or bacteria, or oCher ~ubstances into the ground wraters? . - . . . , ~ - W ~~duction in the amount of water ~ther-wise avai~able for pubItc water supplies ? . . . , . . . . . . . . . ~ / I - Q ~ r~ (IF SPr~~E FOR EXP'UINATICN IS TNADEQUAT4 F"LEASE ATTACx~i ADDITIO1N'AL PAGES,) Ye5 Ni iybc~ 4. F'Iora. VVili the proposal result Ln: ~ (a) C'iange in tk~e diversity of species, or numbers of tiny ~~ecit-s :Df flnra (ineluding tr(,es, slirubs, grciss, rrops. rtticroflora and aquatic plants)? a , . . . . . . _ _ _ RLdu~ti~an of the ~numbers af any t~:~lt~ve, rare ~r en~angered species of flara? . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (c) Intt`oduction of new species of f1ora tnto an areaf in a barrier eo the normaI repleriishment of exlsti"cj sL"ec*es? i • i . • r • • • • • s a s a . (d) Rer:+:tction itt acreage of an-v agr#.cultur~l crop ? P~ - Expla natinn. _V A F ~ ~ -•+C'' ~ • ~ ~ _ 5, Fauna, Will khe proposal s-esult tn; Changes in the c~iversity vf species, or numbers of any s~~~ies of fauna (birds, ~and art$mals inclucltrig reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic orgctnisms, insects or mfcrofauna) ? . . . , . . . . . , . , . , ~ (b) Reduction of the numbers of an}r uniqUe, rare, or P-ndangea`ed species esf fauna . . . . . . , . . . . (c) Irttrorluctton of new species of fauna lnta an area, or result in a barrier to the mlgration or movement of faurta? (d) I)t~te±foratlon of existing fish or wildlife habitat? , , . , _ ~ _ jxplanation: . ~ , ~ ~ ,e~ • ~ Yes Maybe Na ti . Noise. Wi11 the propcrsal increase existing nofse leveIs ? , . . Exp1a3Yation: ir ~~I ~ ~~f: ~ ~ . . _ . ~ ~ I / YeS Maybe No 7. cincf G1are. Will the pr4posal pv?duc;e new ligiit ot- gl:jre;} ~ ~ 1:;xpIarao ti~n: • ~~rwA ~ . F 8 1 i'eS MaybE: ~o P. La;,d Use. %,%''Lli the proposal restilz 11-1 L!IC- a1[eration of th~ prLsLnt V'r piaYil}ed 1Wnd uw7G of a.li 57.re!1 ,a f i . i • . i s a r ~ fsxplana[ion; . at ~ ~1~-~'~ `L!'4.`~ /'~.r'""~.. ~ ~ a✓~ . . n ~ ~a rA.p° ~ ~ ~ . i P - (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PIEASE ATTACfi AI7DI'I'IC?NAL t'r:(:ES.l V G 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable na[ural resource? ✓ LxUlanation: ' ~ . l,t.tif , ! t ! YPS ~•t,~..~ ' 10. Risk of Uaset. Does the proposal iilvolve 3 risk of an explosion or the release vf hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions?. ` Explanation: Yes I\i,-iy~,e No ? 1. Populatioi-,. '.V;ll thc prorosal alter the locaii.0n, distribution, density, or growth rate o~ the human population of an area ? . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . V~ E?iDlc3riatl0l'1: •_.•_•~s7t~.~..*1.- t L v.._,~ t c. ~ 1 JM 12. Housii7q. WA1 tiic- propcsa: aii~~~c, o;;isting housing, or create a demand for adciitional housinq ? . . . . . . . . }'xplsnation: 7 , ~ " a~ - Y('S I`::-jyk)n 13. TransportationiCirculation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of adciitional vehfculer movem►-nt ? , . . . . ~ (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or c? em .ind for new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? v - (d) Alterations tv present patterns of circulatian or movement• of people and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . ~ v ~ (e) Alterations to waterbome, rail or air traffic? _ (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, ~ bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . EXp I d Tl d C iOIl . l~ nr ~I /~L`~ •~1.J.n.{s' (•+v "~.l~4? Gt.fttA,J ~ a ~ i (IF SPACE FOR E?tPI.ANATIc]N I5 INADEQUaTE, PI.F.ASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGE5.) Yas Mayhe No 14. Pub]ic Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altcrPd clovernmental services in any of the follawing areas ? (a) Fire protection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , ✓ +r (b) Police pratection? . . , . . , , . , . . (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or othec recreational facilicies7 . . . . . . . , f ~ (e) Maintenance of public faciliCies, including raads? ~ w (fl Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ZAA Exalana tion: -oil V.4~ ~LreS Ma}'.~,,? No 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ✓ (b) Dem3nd upon existing sources of energy, or require ~ the developm2nt of new sources of energy? _ Explanation: ~ ~ ~ V ~.~„r ' ~ ~ ~ 4•L-' Vi.' Ta/ Aii. Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alteration5 to the following utflities: (a) Power or natural gas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . , r ~ (c) WaCer? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~e) Stocm wa ter drainaqe ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ✓ ~ (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: , , ' - - _ Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in [he creation of any health hazard or poEential health lazard (excluding mental health) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . L~" Explanation: ~ ~ - . ~ r • (IF ~PACE FOR D{PLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P: .LASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGLC.) Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the ohstrurtion of any scenic vista or view open to the p-lb3ic, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aestr:etically offensive si[e oPen to Public view? . . . . . . . . • • • . • • - • • ~ Explanation: Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the pcoposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreati.)nal oppor[unities ~ Expl ana tiUn : Yes Maybe iVo 20. Archeological/Historical. Wi11 the p~-oposal result in an alteration of a significant archeologicu•1 or hfstorical siCe, structure, object or building? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: III. STGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the perialty of perjury that the above respanses 3re made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any wlllful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full disclosure on rny Part, SPokane County may wlthdraw any declaratlon of nonslqniflcance that it mtght issue ln reliance upon this checkllst, Pt~'~/~l. Date. . 3 Proponent: (Please Print or Type) ~ ~ < Proponent: L.. CC # = . ~ c, Address: ir C-' Phone: co Person completing form: ~~i;:• C~C:, r` j'~'? P lione : ~ R D I v k Da te : - - M aR 141977 SPOKANE CO RN ~~NT D?pk. or Office of County Reviewing Checklisc: Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: 1j71t1 - -7 ~t - - - - - _ . _ - _ _ ~ . : . - i OFFICE OF C~~NTY ENGINEER SPO)U+NE COUNTY, WASHINGT0N Qa~„ Aoril 11 ,19 77 Inter-oftice Communicotion . To °~~'ZrG CO?~MISSIOy -A~Y KE1~NALY, PL-ANKIVG & TjtAFFIC DIZTISION ENGINEE2 From ~ 0 4j1/ 7? suo1•ect_pE L09Z-7-, 3~E-S'B-'77; LNJssI,C)f~ 2t o~6 AD0I-r.I . ~ tnat conditional apprvval of the plat is givzn subject to dedication of Right of . Way #Co the public and approval of the road sys te:a in the plat by the Coua`y Eaoixtezr; that plarzs, profiles, and cross sections showing proposecl street centerti:ae aad curb grades be subinitted to the Couaty Enoineer for 2pproval prior to construction aad the filing of a final plat; _ that drainaoe plans and desi.ga calcuiations showing the grades and alig=ent of draia- aje zacilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to coastruction an3 the iiling of a finai plat; _ construction within the proposed public stre4ts and ease,mezts shall be perfozmeci - under the direct supervision of 2 licensed laad surveyor, who sha13 be responsi'oIe for parpetuating all evidence of the location oil. suzvzy ronuaaents 14hicii may be disturbz3 during construction and who sha?- iurnish the County Enoineer with "As .BuiIt" plans and a certificate in Writino that all improvem2ats were iastailed to the 3ines 2nd grades shoWa on the approved construction plans and that all distcirbed r1onum?nts have been replaced; no construction work is to be perfCozmed within the Public Right of k'ay uatil a Ferait has ae2n issu2d by the County Enoineer. All work is subject to inspactiorc and approval by the County Engineer; _ all coas truction within the Public Rig'nt of Way is to bz completed pri.or to filing t'i:z 'Lir.al plat or a bond in the a-t-nount es tia.ated by the County Engineer to cover the cosr of con3truction of improveQents, construction certiiication, "As Bui.It" plans, - ana :-onunienti na the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Enoimazr. that the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal accept- able to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road intersectiott' State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the . filing of the final plat. Ia~rovements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility , of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a boad to cover the cos[ of such improve-- . ments furnished to the County EngYneer i.n the amount as determined by the County Engineer an3 the State Hiohway Drpartment. . DE D tc_A Tc p..,l I O' /40 DITcpnl 4*C. 10itf ~O~l G v/►~~UEfZS~ T~ ~E~1/U~ - DE p i vq Ti o4 2S / PiO D IT a4r4(_ IZIW 4L&*lG E~4 s r /-vAOpe~Z-IY &%,1E" V-o -t-uI2E EXTE'•~S~o•J oF Gc.eNnl 126 A* a. ' - . M 5?0~ANE VALLE(I ~IRE DEPA`I+1`'LENT EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, 1NASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 April 5, 1977 • Mr. Fred L. Dayharsh Spokane County Planning Commission Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear P",r. Dayharsh: L l r1 The following zone changes and preliminary subdivisions have been reviewed for adequate fire protection: 1 h J 7 PE-1086-77 ~ ~ ZE- 46-77 - hlains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. PE-1091-77 , ' ZE- 58-77 - There are exi sti ng ma i ns i n th i s area but hydrants wi 11 be needed. , ~ E-1092-77 ZE- 59-77 - Nlains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. . - . , . . PE-1093-77 y : • ZE- 60-77 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed`•.ini this area. , ~ PE-1037-76 . - ~ ' . • ~ • ZE- 96-76 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in~"th'is area. ZE- 14-77 - Mains and hydrants need to be installedr in;,th`is%area. ~ ~ ZE- 137-76 - Mains and hYdrants need to be installed inrthis~ar'ea. ~ • N~ \ ~ •~wll be ZE- 34-77 - There are existing mains in this area butrhydrants i - needed. . ZE- 35-77 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this,area. ~ ; , . . . . t~ ~ ECEIVE - aPR 61977 SPOKANr COUNjY PLaNNiNG oEpARTMENT ~ ~ J PRE VENT FIRES sA vE LIVEs N E [i "Serving the OPPORTUNITY AREA for Over 60 Years" C~ v ' Telephone 928-4544 - r j , ~~r{R eQ~`~ 8ox 14008 - Opporfunity Branch Spokone, Wcshington 992 i 4 C 0 M . , , , , , . Kazch 8, 1977 Fred L. Dayharsh, Director Spokane County Planning Commission N. 811 Jefferson , Spokane, WA 99201 RE: Preliminary Subdivision of the area sketched in red of S1i of Sec. 9 25-44. See Enclosure. Dear Mr. Dayharsh: The l.and sketched in red ink in the S11 of Sec. 9, 25-44 is zn the Modern j Electric Water Company service area. The Company shows this parcel be- i longing to L. C. Magee. I understand A'irs. Rose Davis represents the Magees. The party caishing to subdivide this land is represented by Mrs. Roy Heggem. Upon cqmpletion of satisfactory arrangements with the Modern Electric jJater ' Company, the utility is capable of providing water for domestic use`and ~ ~ tire protection, and electricity for residential consumption. , Sincerely, ~ ` ' ~ ; / j ' 'L„/'~ Art Keelez Water Supezintendent AK:ms Enc. PE-1092-77 & ZE-59-77 . , In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Mrs. Roy Heggem, East 11318 - , 25t'h Avenue, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Mission Ridge Addition. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Single Family Residential and/or Two-Family Residential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats, of such property. The property being platted is described as the South 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44, E,V1T.M., Spokane County, Washington, except Fauser's Addition, also except the East 25 feet of the South 165.23 feet. (East of University Road, approximately 130 feet north of Mission Avenue.) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE 4F WASHINGTON ) ) SSa COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) - e , Being first duly sworn, deposea and says. . That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one yearso ~ That on 191, he personal.ly posted three (3) true and correct c ies of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: 2. ~ . ~ 4u~ Sti a~.z~ '~i 3. ~ Subscribed and sworn to me , 19 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASH1.riG"~JTt Residing at Spokane, Washington ~~~~IPT Date - - l~ 9l'l - - 4 G o Rece;ved From _ Addrec,q C vl lars ~ 4+ ~ ~ ~ h ~ For ACCOUN"f HO4Y RAfD SPO"'R COMM PUM"G AMT. C1F } ~ - ACC{3UtJT CASN APaT. PAla BAiANCE DUf 4RE7ER Stf806 ped~~r~ I~ . t- March 24, 1977 Nr.Darroll Waller, Superintarident East Va!ley SCr.ool Llsttict # 361 North 3415 Pines Road Spokans, WA 99206 Deas Mr. tiyaller: The Planning CommEssion presently has two (2) preliminary plat proposals before it fflr consideration at its April Hearinq, that lle withln your distrlct bcn►nd4rlew. Please respond with any appropriate commerzt regarding the effect upon your districts facilitles tn the event these are approved. I have enclosed a copy of the agenda paqe to aid you ln your review. Thank you far your cooperall'ion. S trtcersly. Robert J. Betharc!s ' Plat Administrator RJB:kj £nclo su re . ~ - 4p'~Q~E C~G'j'i~ y r~ ` SPOK,4NE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT - ~ Inter-Offi ce Communi cation 9~TH O\S1 Date: March 16, 1977 T0: Spokane County Plannina CommiSSion FR01~1: E. C. Prather, R.S. ,~~p ? - e- n ~ MISSIOV RZnGE ADDTTION SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plats - MISSION HILLS 1ST ADDITION & SUSAN K. WALKER SUBDZVISION. I. References: a. Maps: l. Man of MISSION RIDGE ADDITI0N, scale t" - 50' bv Siripson, da[ed ~iarch 81 1977. ~ 2. Map of MISSION HILLS 1ST ADDITION, scale t" = 100' by Simpson, dated Apri1 20, 1970, and Revised April 13, 1972. 3. Map of SUSAN K. IIALKER SUBDXVISION, scale t" = SO' by Simpson, dated March 7, 1977. b. Soil Survey, Spokane ,County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, March, 1968. c. Spokane County, 14ashington, Enaineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation Service, .August, 1974. d. Field investidatic~n report of subject by this office,?~tarch 10, 1977. e. The Effect_of ApQlied Surface Waters on Groundwater Qullity in the SDokane Valle,v., Section 608, iJater Resources Stuciy -Metropolitan Srokane RePion, U.S. Armv Corps of Engineers, Apri1. 7, 1975. f. Map, Spokane Ouadrangle, 1:62500, U.S.G.S., 1949. g. Groundwater Resources and Related Geolo~y, Vorthcentral Spokane and South- eastern Stevens Countv of jJashington, j,lashington State Dept. of Ecology, 1969. II. Topography, soils and water. " a. The plats axe in a genexally flat area north and east of Dishman. ~ b. Geologically the soils in the area are glaciofliivial'deposits: streamlaid sand and gravel containing some boulders in places and including some undif£erentiated glacial deposits; 1ower terrace remnants probably reworked by streams; yield moderate to very large amounts of water. 14ell logs show most wells to be 90 to 250 feet deep with large yields. Wells in this area penetrate generally gravely soils. SCHD-ADM-118 ~ c. StructuralZy the soils are classed as Carrison gravel].y loam, 4-5 percer.t slopes, with slight limitations for septic tank filter fields; possible contamination o£ grotindwater. Field investigation reveals no evidence of groundwater that would precltide subsurface disposal ~ of wastewa_ter under current Health District regulations. The District has no record of excessive failures of drainf ields in this immediate area. - d. Individual subsurface disposal sewage systems have been proposed for treatment and disposal of sewage generated within the project. This raiszs the question of signif icance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and nossible alternatives for sewage disposal. e. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typzcal soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the aroundc.•izr:, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spoknne River tlallvy upon the quality of the groundvater. In su==arv, hr cor.c luclad that : 1. Zn normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of acxage treat=anc effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. 2. A_ll the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the ;roundcaater. However, bacteria and deterqents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer, above the groundwater and "minar dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 3. "The calculated results at the downstream end of a groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) salids concentration exnected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/t (milli- grams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 md/1. The farecast _year 2020 maximur► incremental concentra- tion is 101 mg/1 above the natural background." ---"The analytical results of the f orecast imnact at year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present irnpact on groundwater quality is already a substantial propor- tion of the ultimate level." f. Au-,ust, 1975, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of *_he groundcvater as in the range of 0.8 to 0.9 ppm. A projected in-\ cremental increase using Dr. Todd's exnected 8.6 percent would result in ranoes from 0.87 to 0.98 pom. Current Federal and State drinking „ water standards permit up to 10 ppm. g. Altern3tive sewa~e disposal methods that would not recharrye the ground- water have t'ne following general characterista.cs: t. Col.lector and cen*ral treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a peYmit for the discharge from the Department of Ecolo;;y. ThesP sy,stems are not currently economically avaiJa- ble f or this proj ect . 2. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. These systems require more -2- - . r ~ . . ~ l.and area than a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as laaoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Land, installation, and oFerational costs are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields. 3. Special disposal systems using various methods of irrigation or using evapotranspiration have had insufficient use in this area to validate design criteria. Irrigation requires effluent , disinfection in most cases. These systems also require rela- tively large areas for year around operation. Land and some I operational costs are more than for septic tanks and drainfields. Again, without a specific additional treatment to rernove dissolved solids or completely sealin~ the disposal area from percolation, some dissolved salts cvill be carried with eff luent recharse to the groundwater. h. Historically, urban density development has resulted in polluted ground- water beneath the development and increased values of land to the extent space for ind'Lvidual sewaje disposal drainfields is too expensive for that use. III. Conclusion: a. The use of subsurface sewage disposal systems for these projects will have a negligible impact on the water quality. b. The development of these projects in conjunction with other surrounding urbanizing projects can be expected ultimately to have at least a moderate impact on the water quality. c. The plat sponsors have proposed a public water supply for the plats as an extension of Modern Electric SJater Company. Extension of this system to serve the plats would provide an excellent means of ineeting the re- quirements of D.S.H.S. tor public water supplies. d. The topography and soils in the plats are suitable for installation of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. Such systems will have negligible immediate impact on the-environment in the area but con- tinued urbanization in the area at this density historically pollutes groundwater under the development at some time in the future. e. The plat should be served by the ecistins public water system in the area. f. Proposed density ;reater than 3.5 dwelling units per acre, will require an on-site sewa'e disnosal mana;ement system. IV. Recommendations. Prior to signino the final plat: a. Contractual agreements shall be concluded between the plat sponsor and the existing public water purveyor. b. No more than two dwelling units per lot shall be permitted; an on-site management system shall be approved by the Health District if the system is required. -3- - - . . . . . ~ ~ S c. Sponsors shall present evidence that the plats lie within the recorded service area of the water purveyor. d. Individual on-site sewage disposal systems cvill be accepted for sewage disposal in the plat. cc: Clarence E. Simpson, Engineers. ~ ~ : ~ ~ y_• e r V ► • . t- ~ i'1 „ r. . .f ; . > • : • ' ' ..i j , t ' : . ' j ' • f~ I. -4- . r r March 23, 1977 Mayot, Town of MiiYwood East 1903 Frederick Mlllwood, NVA 99206 Dear S ir: Please review the enclosed prrellminary plats of Mission Ridge and Nisslon H!1!s Flrst Addltlon, and forward any approprlats comment to our office by Aprit 40 1977. I f we have noi rer.eived any comment from yaur office by that date, we wlil assume that you do czot have any. Thanld you fcr your cooperatfon. Sincerely, Roberttj. 8ethacds Plat Admintstrator Rjs:k9 h C CLARENCE E. SIMPSON RICHARD L. SIMPSON ~ CHARlES E. SIMPSON Ularerice e. SimpJon engineer.4, Ac. CIVIL ENGINEERS AWD LAND SURbEYORS - Registered in Wa.rbington as:d Idaho TELEPHONE 926-1322 OFFICE N. 909 ARGONNE RD., SPOKANE, WASH. 99206 March 11, 1977 PRELIMIlVARY PLAT MISSION RIDGE LEGAL DESCRIPTION The South 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of S ection 9, T. 25 N., R. 44 E. W. M. Spokane County Washington, Except Fauser;s Addition, also bkeept the East 25 feet of the South 165.23 feet. . R . 6 ~ E C E I V E D MaR 141917 sPoKaNE cou~~EnT PIANNtNG DEPAR PF- ~ . E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM AREA AND DISTANCE ■ooooo000000oo0ooODOOODOOOOOOODOOO0OO0o0o0oooOOOOOOOOOODOOOOaoo Total amount of land in this Subdivision: Acres Proposed clensity of the Plat : Cs, Lots/Gross Acre `.t'otal amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Acres Proposed use of controlled adjoining land: What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? Shopping facilities? I Municipal Boundary: Paved street or highway? 0 LAIVD USE ■oooooooooaooaaooooo0000000oooooaooOooooo00000000000oooooaooooooooooao Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( Duplexes (X Indicate lots for duplexes: Ln+,q I C,, Multi-family dwelling units ( Indicate which lots: Mobile Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses: Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? ~ List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: acres. !Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres , I s keeping of animals desired? 1Vo Yes ( Type : ~ ~ IMPROVEMENTS WODOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODO000D00000000000 ~ G ! Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi-phase dev- ! elovment? ; To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel Minimumo y ICurb ancI Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( I" Describe any combinations of above: What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: Street :_mprovements completed? Substantial number of lots occupied"? Is dedi-:ation of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. Yes ( Describe: i' ' Yndicate the size of units roposed to be constructed: 100 O~ Square feet J ~ Number of bedrooms Z J~ y► ~ • i ' Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No Yes ( Will any special deed restrictions be included in the sale of lots? No (~C Yes ( , If "yes", explain: , , ~ ~ ~ UTILITIES ■ooooo0000oooooaoooooooooa~ooooo00000oooooaooooo00000000000oooooao.00oo ~ ; Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank Lagoon ( i~ Treatment plant ( Other, or combinations (Describe) ~ Indicate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( Public system Private community system ( ~ Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): ! Underground utility easements ( Overhead utility easements ( X). , Utilities in streets ( >C ) . No easements ( ) . Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest exz.sting water main: feet. Indicate size of nearest main: 1 Oea Inches. List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: ~ F.l crtri t-i +-xr~ {.ifrr.4, ~'~afi: W W p Water: 1\A o dc rn Phone: C~~ w ~ / E X H I B I T A Page 2 , PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM (Continued) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ■ooooOODOOOODOOOO00ooO0oooo000000000,00000oooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOo ~ - . PROPOSED PLAT NAME: a490- ` I I, the undersigned, have completed the inf rmation requested, and the Preliminary Plat has been prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane Cou ing Department and the laws of the State of Washington. ~'S (Signed) Date : _ I7 7 v 9~~~ ~ 99~7 (Address) N, 909 Rd, Phone : 9Z6~-- 13Z Z ;0 4t , 0. zip: y 9zo6, ~ , ~ suRVta~ #5'-'1.s7EAL: please print I, , 0e,114 , the sponsor of this proposed subdivision, am the owner ; buil ` - ; agent ( option holder ( contract holder of the prop 7erty proposed to be platted and have completed the information requested of ine and do hereby testify that it is correct and accurate. (Signed) Date: 3-/5 - r '~D , • tfi_ ,,,.t t7 rv , e. • " °Y~gMz "r' (Address) Phone • . '°"ue • . .t . ~ `,r„ i• . . . - 1 f r r w~~ w 4 Y Yl i v`~ "~i~Vs LJZP` • l ~4 • F.:''h 'r` t C' f lil ' • ~ / II l~l'/I VV V ~ .k r ' y~ NOTARY ja~~ Date : 'i • - .x „ . ~T ,~t~~, - - rt l ~;i 4 v "y ~ NOTARY SEAL: Special Comments: .~~~WU,!3 ~q2 . ~Yi Ayj~. MooO000oOoOoDOOOOOO■ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING DEPARTMIIVT ~00Ma400000000000000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION ' Date Submitted: J 1-7 Checked b Y: + wo School District: Preliminary Plat Fee: ~ Existing Zoning: , • Date established: s'-Lq~'~2' _ Zone Change File No. :z--~g- Advertised Zone IIpgrading: ~ Number of Lots: 4? Location: Section ~ Township Rangei~ . \ Plat File No.: PE- Plat Name : I~ - ' i ~ ~ ~ ~'c~u ar~e h~~r~e~~► r~~tif~~c~, that on _ ~ , ~t th~ h~~u~ ~vf +~f ~ai~ d~y in~ ~o~f~~r~er~~e ~~or~rr A, AAall~n ~Iv~nu~ E~- #r~~t~e~ ~p+~k~r~~ ~t~~r~ty ~C+~ur~ F~~use A~n~x, Spt~~~n~~ ~Ila~hinc~t~n, Th~ ~P~t}I~A~~1~ ~CC~UNTY PLAhIIVII~~ ~~~MII~~S- ~►IC~~1 will ~vn~~u~t ~ prublic he~rir~~ t~ r ~ ~ ~ MA~i ~ ~ ~ ~I ~QMi! ~ ~ 1~i~ O~ ~ "~'i ~ 1!~ ~i ~C~ '~1 ~ ~ ~Mi~•~it~LT ~ ~'~'~1~1"~"I~ C~~~~~'I~~I~'f1 C~r~C~i ~ ~ +~ql~ T~C ~iY ~ ~ ~ ql' ~ ~ ~/i 9~ ~ 1~., ~ ~~t., ~ +G~"i, ~r ~'1~ ~~li ~M ~ ~ ~ 1~.,~b ' ~wa~~~ ~ ~i~ ~r~r.3 F~~ F~~TH~~ ~ET`AIL~S t~►n~aet tl~~ ~p~k~n~ Co~n~ Y ~~ar~r~ir~g ~~r~nm~~~i~~, P~bl~~ ~Ill~rk~ B~ui~dir~g, N. ~11 ~'ef~~r- ~~n ~tr~~t, 5p~~~n~, l~l~~hir~gt~n. ~ Dire~tor ~f Pla~ning Spok~~e ~County Pi~nning ~ammissir~~ F4Ri16~b~''~~lG, CC7MM. ~•7S I ~ ~ ~ Evl,+~"~~.;:~ {5~ ~ ( ~ ~ = . , F ~ d ~ Z ~ L ~ N L I S 1' ~ `!Q~i:H 1L, 15~7~ , ~ - - - - - - e ~ ~P~~A~; G~:~,~~aTt' L~Iv;I FII.~ r-,~ ~h ~ P~~~C4~ C~~JC~~i~~JT - - - - ~I~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~a~~ - ~,~{~,~~i. ~~~~~~~TI+~ i~~~~Y~F ~ - - ~~~~4~~f►~3~ Cb~ 7` ~ ~ ~ v~ ~ • F►~t~:~. ~i~C 1~ CT~'C ~L'T_~A'V +~+b . ~ ~ ~ Jt~ 18"~~ 7 +.~~3 ~ - - _ _ _ _ - ~~~4~-~U37 ~~t~ ~a;~+~I,~~~r'ti I-~ ~`~Yd.C~~n F~~.~::~' ~ i.; ~ L~" F~C M~.1T ~~i~ ~ t~ ~ r` 3 ~ ~ . ~ 3 ~ 19 ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~1~43-~~'~3~ 7~~~~9(1~~4 ~F~--~~ ~ h:-0~~,~t' ` ~F:~U~.~~ l~U~ L~~i €~~~l~S~~~£~~S ~'TG ;t p 1~'~}~~9~ ~ ~ ~ - , - - ~ rt- ~ j r V7~~'~iQ.J~ ]'f+~~~~~ s~~~+li~~~~~„M:~»iil~~ ~~l~~~M'.3 ~i4+Li ~~C'~ ~~~nC ~~~~-4 ["I /4 r ~ . ~ • Y ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' \ /A ~ ~ ~~~~+~i~'~ ~fl; ~/~2~~ y ~ - - - ~ - _ _ ; . ~ M ~0"4~~►3-C~44~ ~~~17~~, ,~~d~l~ R ~,~R~r~~ ~~1JSE~~ A't~C~ l~ ~+l ~~R~'~F~ J'~h~ R ~ ~ ~(3~l~Z1 I5~ I~~v AYE u _ ~e.. - - - _ a ~ SF~-~fr ~d~ 5~2~~ 4 4 9~r 4~ p" ~ r w D~~ C~ F i~ I~ I.! T V~( 4~i~ 3~~ l l~~~E, R~~C. ~tn F S c S L 1 I S~ B 4}~' ~ ~ i ~~~~c ~8~~~-~!~'~~ ?4~~~1~G17~ ~,I~I~ ag ~ ~PP~i~clllh~ITY #~T . ~ ~3l3 ~~.LI~ - - E~1~~ r~~3~~~ ~o~ t~% ~~~`~N~~~' t~ -NE~~F~T" ~(`FT IIF~S4 ~I?~7~ Lt~ ~ Y~~ ~ ITY P~ _ _ ~ ~;y ~e~F :C ~~~~t~}~~ ~9~C~ : _ ~~~4~~►=~J~'~ 5~~~~~"~' • ~ • ,~f~u~~~r~~T~RT~~~~-~s3T~~ , C~~~ ~fiiT~ ~ „ ~ ~ ~ C ~F ►~4 AC [?F c 1l~ ~ 331 ~41 G.l 4~ I ~ 4~ - ; ~ ; ~ ~ i~ ~ . ~ Y ~ _ f~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~r ~ ~ ~ L I ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~`v T F ~3~ ~~L'L ~ H ' ~i1~F' ~F S ~~F N~ ~ Z~1~ '~1~IV~~t~ITY R~ 3~~lK~k~~ V~A ~9~C~ ~ S~MNM~~?Y ~~1~'~l= IN~'1~T C+'~~f~S ~'~~c~cl5 P~I~~T I,I"~~-~ F~~' M~t SS ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~i~ z Q~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ Cc ~`6~. C ~ ~ ~ d,l,~C.,~t c~ ~ I~I r ~ - - - ~ p7~ r . ~ ' ° ' ~ ~ f 1 L c-c~t~c ~ ~hif C ~ ~ ~ . ~~~Y r- ~ ~'~N~Y~N , ~ c~ ~ ~ ~l Q. - ~:c:~w~.~r ~ ~i~l~ , ..r,rY ~~~~OIY _ - - ~ _ ~ ~~'If~e . - ~T't1~tL1 ~ r-~.~...o~ ~-C.~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~Y; f ~ ~ - . - - - - - ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ' ~ _ r _ _ _ ~ . ~ ~ f . _ ~ . - . f , ~ ~-r . ~ / ~ i ~f~ • ~ _ . - _ _ _ i ~ _ z _ - ~ ~ ~ x~ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ r~~ ~ / _ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - . _ -