The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/08/2006 SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Council Chambers - City Hall 11707 E. Sprague Avenue June 8, 2006 6:00 to 9:00 pm I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES VI. PUBLIC COMMENT VII. COMMISSION REPORTS VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS New Business — Public Hearing Street Vacation STV-02-06, McMillan Rd — Mike Basinger Public Hearing —Amending ROW .Obstruction Permit Ordinance 10.05 -Tom Scholtens Old Business - Update on UDC process and public participation — Marina Sukup Update on Sprague/Appleway Sub-area Plan — Scott Kuhta Rules of Procedure Annual Review X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XI. ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF Gail Kogle, Chair Marina Sukup, AICP Robert Blum, Vice-Chair Greg McCormick, AICP Fred Beaulac Scott Kuhta, AICP John G. Carroll Mike Basinger, Assoc Planner David Crosby Cary Driskell, Deputy City Attorney Ian Robertson Deanna Griffith Marcia Sands www.spokanevalley.orq CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: June 8,2006 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: El consent ❑ old business ®new business ®public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin.report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing. Street Vacation Request(STV-02-06)for the vacation of a portion of(30' x 1256.5') McMillan Street located between Euclid Avenue to the North and Buckeye Avenue to the south. PREVIOUS ACTION TAKEN: City Council adopted Resolution No. 06-011 on May 9, 2006, setting the date for a public hearing. 'W .t" l a • tt 0103 L'' } • i 1. ,t-. 1 . l * 1'*t Parcel SS0S2.0114 ate;--. R r, ' F --•'-- n F � ,,,..,..c,_„: �. _._n T �,��— - .. t - f.. . id .31 4 ,iS]F !1 .uA: erT . . Pt pi •� • "'_sr.- k a i. --11! , p,w 3 4:C;:#4.1 • '..-14-4..-- F"-F- ` `' - - -. ,• nt - ?fi . Vi}' 1ifirc-i } . Pagel 51032 012 Fr; "`,LPlILE1 '- S2O1OS i, � , i dry ,fit :rAL r 1 A. �, , .`' ,mss f r '; e itis 11'5:11. 4,._ a. �" / r' , ,1 f r •Y' - Ii 1 t.1 . , , .k ' - Gt 1Ce3 6,,— '. �j -ti i 7 '7,-; :'!'i47±..1....,'.`x l' • '� tel *} �1 f.-a4•.i_'_• ��l ' slt= t,--. " 131 here" - . , :t) .--.2?" -3-'-_ -s A—_' ,', - it II_ '.t=�r ''_ t-rya, rf` BACKGROUND: The applicant Lots N Land, LLC, do Ken Tupper, 122 N Raymond, Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 requests the vacation of an unimproved portion of McMillan Street. This section of McMillan Street (between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue) has a Temporary Closure to vehicular traffic. The Temporary closure (Resolution 99-0124) was issued and approved by the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners on February 16, 1999. The applicant is proposing an 85 lot subdivision on parcels 55082.0103 and 55052.0108 contingent upon the vacation. The Planning Commission must make findings on the following as part of their recommendation to City Council: A. Whether a change of use or vacation of the street or alley will better serve the public; B. Whether the street or alley is no longer required for public use or public access; C. Whether the substitution of a new and different public way would be more useful to the public; D. Whether conditions may change in the future as to provide a greater use or need than presently exists; and E. Whether objections to the proposed vacation made by owners of private property (exclusive of petitioners) abutting the street or alley or other governmental agencies or members of the general public. OPTION: Recommend approval,approve with conditions,or recommend denial. RECOMMENDATION: Approval subject to filing a record of survey which includes reservation of all utility easements, execution by the City of a Quit Claim deed to entitled property owners, and placement of monuments in accordance with the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. STAFF CONTACT: Mike Basinger,Associate Planner ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit 1: Staff Report Exhibit 2: Findings and Recommendations of the CSV Planning Commission Exhibit 3: Street Vacation Application with Written Narrative Exhibit 4: Comments from Staff,Agencies and Utility Providers Exhibit 5: Preliminary Plat of D-4 STAFF REPORT c,SiÔkane PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTION OF MCMILLAN STREET Valley Prepared by: Michael Basinger,Associate Planner Date: June 8, 2006 Findings: 1. Abutting Properties: a. Abutting property No's 1 &2(Parcel No's 55082.0103 and 55082.0108)are located on the western boundary of the proposed vacation. These two parcels are proposed for an eighty-five (85)lot subdivision(D-4)by Lots N Land,LLC. b. Abutting property owner No. 3 (Parcel No. 55082.0124)located on the north eastern boundary of the proposed vacation owned by Charles W.and Pamela D.Adams, 19114 E.Euclid Avenue, Otis Orchards,WA 99027-9515. c. Abutting property owner No.4 (Parcel No. 55082.0133)located on the south eastern boundary of the proposed vacation owned by Linda S.Hanson, 19115 E.Buckeye Avenue,Otis Orchards, WA 99207-9583. 2. Utilities: All the utilities were notified;no utilities or easements required within the 30 foot McMillan right-of-way(ROW)between Buckeye Avenue and Euclid Avenue. 3. Access: The proposed residential development(D-4 85 lot subdivision)will provide a connection between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue. 4. Zoning: Zoning for the property and abutting tracts is Urban Residential—3.5 (UR-3.5). The applicant is proposing to rezone parcels 55082.0103 and 55082.0108 to accommodate the densities associated with the proposed 85 lot subdivision. 5. Transportation: The proposed residential development will be required to provide new roadways and ROW for vehicular continuity. 6. Condition: The proposed vacation(McMillan Street)has never been active, improved,or maintained as an established street since its dedication in 1911. Unimproved McMillan was temporarily closed to vehicular traffic by the County on February 16, 1999(See attached recorded resolution). 7. Assignment of Vacated portions of right-of-way: Pursuant to RCW 35.79.040,the City Council in approving a street vacation request shall specify that the vacated portion of the street or alley shall belong to the abutting property owners, one-half to each,unless factual circumstances otherwise dictate a different division and distribution of the street or alley to be vacated. Conclusions: 1. The vacation of the street/alley will permit full development of the property for beneficial uses and permit appropriate levels of maintenance. 2. McMillan Street is not required for public use or public access. 3. New roadways and ROW will provide vehicular continuity for the proposed development. 4. There are no utility easements currently or requested within the proposed vacation. 5. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION Valley June 8,2006 Findings: 1. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 8,2006,to receive testimony concerning the vacation of an unimproved portion of McMillan Street between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue. The date of the hearing was set by City Council on May 09, 2006 by Spokane Valley Resolution No.06-011. Notice of the hearing was published on May 19,2006 and May 26,2006 in the Valley Herald,the official newspaper of the City, posted in three conspicuous locations within the City,provided to the petitioners and abutting property owners, and two signs were placed on the property providing notice of the hearing. 2. The Planning Commission reviewed the report prepared by the Spokane Valley Community Development Department in detail. 3. The vacation of the street/alley will permit full development of the property for beneficial uses and permit appropriate levels of maintenance. 4. McMillan Street is not required for public use or public access. 5. New roadways and ROW associated with the proposed development (D-4) will provide vehicular continuity. 6. There are no utility easements currently or requested within the proposed vacation. 7. No objections have been received to the proposed vacation. Conditions of approval: The Spokane Valley Planning Commission therefore recommends to the City Council that that portion of McMillan Street located between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue be vacated to the petitioners subject to: a) A record of survey prepared by a registered surveyor in the State of Washington and including an exact metes and bounds legal description and specifying if applicable any and all easements for construction,repair and maintenance of existing and future utilities and services. The record of survey shall contain the professional stamp and signature of the registered surveyor and filed upon completion with the Spokane County Auditor.The surveyor shall provide the City of Spokane Valley with a mylar copy of the recorded survey and the Auditor's Document Number and date of recordation. b) Placement of at least two monuments on the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with one located at the intersection of the centerline of the vacated right-of-way with each street or right-of-way in accordance with the standards established by the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction. c) All direct and indirect costs of title transfer of the vacated street or alley from public to private ownership including but not limited to title company charges, copying fees, and recording fees are to be borne by the proponent. The City will not assume any financial responsibility for any direct or indirect costs for the transfer of title. d) The zoning district designation of the properties adjoining each side of the street or alley to be vacated shall be automatically extended to the center of such vacation,and all area shall included in the vacation shall then and henceforth be subject to all regulations of the extended districts. The adopting ordinance shall specify this zoning district extension inclusive of the applicable zoning district designations. e) A certified copy of the ordinance vacating a street or alley or part thereof shall be recorded by the city clerk in the office of the Spokane County auditor. f) All conditions of city council authorization shall be fully satisfied prior to any transfer of title by the City. Approved this Sth day of May,2006 Gail Kogle, Chairman ATTEST Deanna Griffith,Administrative Assistant o� S ff Use Only) 9nn c o � oane CITY OF SPOKI:i�JE VALLEY DATE SUBMITTED: I t)W RECEIVED BY:eeettS 000 valley Community Development Department FILE NO./NAME: �� `� Current Planning Division 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 R 11 o Spokane Valley, WA 99206 V� l = = Tel: (509) 921-1000 CURRENT PLANNING FEE: !kW ' z Fax: (509) 921-1008 ENGINEERING FEE: olanninoftsookanevallev.orq 1J`"` ` STREET VACATION APPLICATION PART I—APPLICATION INFORMATION PROJECT INFORMATION: Name of Public Street Proposed for Vacation: McMillan Road (between Euclid Ave. and Buckeye Ave.) Section/Township/Range of Public Street Proposed for Vacation: North 'h; S 8; TN 25; R 45 Area (Square Feet) of Public Street to be Vacated: 37,695 SF Dimensions of Public Street to be Vacated: 30' wide 1256.5' deep Street Address/Tax Parcel No of Abutting Property#1: 55082.0103 (Applicant) Street Address/Tax Parcel No of Abutting Property#2: 55082.0108 (Applicant) Street Address/Tax Parcel No of Abutting Property#3: 19114 E. Euclid Ave/55082.0124 Street Address/Tax Parcel No of Abutting Property#4: 19115 E. Buckeye Ave. /55082.0133 Zoning Designation of Abutting Property#1 &2: UR3.5 (Application has been submitted to rezone to UR7) Zoning Designation of Abutting Property#3 & 4: UR3.5 Previous Land Use Action,If Applicable(state Project File No. &Name): RESOLUTION 99-0124—TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF THIS SAME ROADWAY SEGMENT APPLICANT/OWNER INFORMATION*: Please note: -Submit on a separate sheet of paper the required applicant/owner information specified below if there are more than two (2) applicants submitting for the Street Vacation. Applicants must be the same as property owners specified on the current Spokane County Assessor's Office parcel records. ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER NO. 1 &2 (Parcel No.'s 55082.0103 & 55082.0108) : APPLICANT NAME: LOTS N LAND,LLCR %roS€,PARTNER (Applicant) .��p1.1`'J�eS MAILING ADDRESS: 122 N RAYMOND CITY: City of Spokane Valley STATE: WA ZIP: 99206 PHONE: (HOME/WORK): 509-924-1211 (FAX): 509-924-0195 (CELL) Please Circle *PLEASE NOTE: Per RCW 35.79.040 (Title to Vacated Street or Alley)the property within a public street or alley vacated by the City Council shall belong to the abutting property owners, one-half to each. Therefore, if there is more than one property owner abutting the public street or alley proposed for vacation, each property owner shall be required to sign the street vacation application. Revised 3/1/2006 ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER NO.3 (Parcel No. 55082.0124) : APPLICANT NAME: CHARLES W. &PAMELA D.ADAMS MAILING ADDRESS: 19114 E.EUCLID AVENUE CITY: Otis Orchards STATE: WA ZIP: 99027-9515 PHONE: (HOME/WORK) _(FAX) (CELL) Please Circle ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER No.4 (Parcel No. 55082.0133) : APPLICANT NAME: LINDA S.HANSON MAILING ADDRESS: 19115 E.BUCKEYE AVENUE CITY: Otis Orchards STATE: WA ZIP: 99027-9583 PHONE: (HOME/WORK) _(FAX) (CELL) Please Circle PART II—EVALUATION CRITERIA (Written Narrative) The following is criteria evaluated by the Planning Commission in formulating a recommendation to the City Council. 1. How does a change of use or vacation of the street/alley improve service to the public? This road has never been active, improved,or maintained as an established county road since its dedication in 1911. This section of McMillan Road(between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue)has a Temporary Closure to vehicular traffic. The Temporary Closure(Resolution 99-0124)was issued and approved by the Spokane Board of County Commissioners on February 16, 1999. (See attached recorded resolution.) . In addition,the City of Spokane Valley does not plan to make this segment of roadway active. Therefore,the change from a Temporary Closure to a Street Vacation will not impact traffic or access from its existing use. Adjoining landowners do not need the right-of-way and have other adequate access to established and maintained roads. Providing a Street Vacation will allow improvements for future residential development. The proposed residential development will provide access that meets the City of Spokane Valley standards for vehicular continuity by providing a connection between Euclid and Buckeye Avenue. 2. Is the street or alley no longer required for public use or public access? Explain. Currently,this section of McMillan Road(between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue) is not in use and has a Temporary Closure to vehicular traffic. The Temporary Closure(Resolution 99-0124)was issued and approved by the Spokane Board of County Commissioners on February 16, 1999. (See attached recorded resolution.) 3. Would substitution of a new and/or different public right-of-way better serve the public? Explain. Yes. The proposed residential development,resulting in part by this vacation,will provide new roadways and right-of-ways(ROW)serving the public in a manner that meets the City of Spokane Valley standards for vehicular continuity. (A draft of the preliminary plat has been attached.) Revised 2/23/2006 4. How will use or need for this right-of-way be affected by future conditions? Explain. Since McMillan was never constructed through the proposed vacation alignment,the use or need can only be estimated. Based on its location, it appears the intended use/need was to provide a nortb/south connection between Euclid and Buckeye. The proposed development on properties#1 and#2 will provide this connection, satisfying the intended use/need of the vacated ROW. 5. Will easements be retained for all underground and overhead utilities? The requested vacation is located in the service area of what utility companies. (Specify)? There are no known utilities within this segment of McMillan Road,therefore no easements will be required. Utility access by means of easements will be provided along the ROW of all new streets in the proposed development on properties#1 and#2. 6. Petitioner(s) contacted the following utilities/agencies with this proposal for their concurrence. (Attach correspondence) ® Telephone-Qwest N Cable- Comcast N Electric-Avista N Gas Utility-Avista ® Water District—Consolidated#19 • Fire District—FD#1 N Sewer Utility—Spokane County • Stormwater—City of Spokane Valley ❑ Other(Specify) 7. Does the right-of-way include stormwater drainage facilities (Specify)? The existing ROW is 30' in width and has no existing stormwater drainage facilities or features evident. NOTE: ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED IN THE STREET VACATION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST SHALL BE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE STREET VACATION APPLICATION WILL BE PROCESSED. Revised 2/23/2006 PART II-LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE Please note:-Submit on a separate sheet of paper the required legal owner signature specified below if there are more than two(2)property owners submitting for the Street Vacation. ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER No. 1 & 2: I,`o, ,,,,-p S '.1.r 65 em, rw,2 - S„-c 44-5 xr tau 1 )4 c., (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY. ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: Lap-a- i/ Ra+l mo tt cl 'R cal PHONE: SO 7•- 9V`l .- / II S Ka ik& S/It-et.t 6)q, ZIP: f qAo4 ,) (State) 1 ,.. Q - 34-06 (Signature) (Date) J NOTARY (For Part II above) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ) Si' day of —KA OAC..-1/1 ,20 0 t NOTARY SEAL a l 1. ` s .x ?�� S, E W z %1 NOTARY SIGNATURE , � j CP OSioN A/qt.\ Notary Public in and for the State of Wash`_ingto o sOTARY 9N Ir Residing at: SSC)\Q.a1Q V� 041AJL 0 N PUBLIC �/ i4-9;\ 1 ��rrio 0", My appointment expires: G-A.C� Q5, M M o itu OF in'ASN25 \ „ Revised 2/23/2006 ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER No. 3: I, (// IseEig J. , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: /0/`1��// < er,e,— ' t�� PHONE: L9'" 972 //X5' 161,-6 . Ad5 4W7 (City) (State) i�..% /<,: �- 5— $— (Signature) (Date) NOTARY (For Part II above) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /f) day of 797a-.4i ,20 0 NOTARY SEAL � /1 G / NOT• ti SIGNATURE S. Lon\‘1 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington ��aSSI®" �e�t i?'. 4.e.2.4�esiding at: �c 1t.//4- Noro, 5144 ---h '� 2): „Li, y appointment expires: /0— � ""0 ii+ 71' °OA, 5 e Revised 2/23/2006 ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER NO. 4: I, i..ji 5• , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: /9/7 r'2 C,Z674- awal- PHONE: -`:1VWe (7 �.EC��/. �s /'% ZIP: (State) t93/AVO C (Signature) (Date) NOTARY (For Part II above) STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: - COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) .� ,20 0C- SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /dam day of �ci NOTARY SEAL :1"--- .-1(-4! NOTARY ST ATURE —€ N1#. % Notary Public in and for the State of Washington , Qpig S6,Z7 Residing at: `4 K/A \Jf l�4 o � �j,►. dr�.~ E \°° Q j My appointment expires: /o - `L p ti, • O �� O eSIWWO 4; \S' Revised 2/23/2006 . .....•°".. -. ......--- .,.------ r .- --°110°.---- i ESL Y AVE. -cgO\VN 290 ...„ 1' . a c: PROJECT • -12<z SITE. m E. EUCLID AVE. .m.! 1 RoNs ...elle DJ rei ii sun i 1.1i 0/11114144 \::::b_11 ar! E. BUCKEYE AVE . 0- .11 a 1 _J E. INDIANNA ___I A V E. LiJ Y 0 . . il I2 < m E. MISSION AVE. Z 1-90 90---------- NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP • • . , "• , •:: „. „. t•. .. ., ,... • STREET VACATION E.-PO .1'!..!E\' LI. Y. • •::::a PI,FM'A E- .:I C:E- OF McMILLAN ROAD fl-,.,.,,i;6 !I'''IE:.:\!F--1.C F i,'E.;.•-'•- (BETWEEN EUCLID AVE. AND BUCKEYE AVE.) • 01/17/2006 12:24 FAX 5094777655 SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEERS U1001 t� - After Recording Return t okane C`vy Engineer • Attn: Engineering Administration 48333 IIII 11111 IIUI thuI 111111 tutuI III IIIII ttIUIII 0212311989969 02:17P • I• I CO ENC. PES $ Spokane Co,IA• • • • RESOLUTION NO. 99, 0124 • • BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON • • IN THE MATTER OF THE ) RESOLUTION ' TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF j McMILLAN ROAD COUNTY ENGINEER'S ROAD FILE NO.2427 ) • This being the'day set for.the hearing on the County Road Engineer's Report on the proposed closure of McMILLAN ROAD,proceedings for which were initiated by Charles Adams and others,and it appearing to the Board on.proof duly made that notice of the hearing was published in the manner and for the time required by law, and the Board after hearing the evidence adduced at the hearing and it appearing that the hereinafter described McMILLAN ROAD is not at the present time serving any •residence and is not required for use of the traveling public. • THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington,that the hereinafter described portion of public road to-wit: McMILLAN ROAD - closed to vehicular traffic from the north right of way line of Buckeye Avenue to the south right of way line of Euclid Avenue of Plat No.2 of West • Farms Irrigated Tracts. . • Located in the Northwest Quarter(NW 1/4)of Section 8,Township 25 North,Range 45 i E.W.M. . be and the same hereby is closed to vehicular traffic. Said closure shall remain in effect until a change is ordered by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,Washington. APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 16th day of February, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF SPIKA •COUNTY,WASHINGTON . i i 4 N i 1 I 1 ' . •. rN% • 4 c•ASLIN,CHAIR • • O ^' q v . .,:„ aa . • ROSKELLEY,VICECRAr • L`D.HARRIS ATTEST: VICKY M. DALTON • CLERK OF THE BOARD / 8111)4174. f 0/(/ t/t A��f •Fax Note 7671 oate//t1 0 Co Iaaot 3 BC:1 IA/(8/t ” ( Post-it DANIELA ERICKSON,DEPUTY Togg From •• • • , Co. I CaJDepl.'(,LS.� . 1\vtrc:Wos�rflan.mcmu�.n . Phone# .Phone# c4-27_7 r/,13 ID IR11111119111119111][ 1 Fax# 3 2$ ,o+tz,3 Fax# et??_76?s—s— • 2427_1)043 1 wf2l�® 1 MAY-25-2006 THU 052 PM FAX NO. P. 01 06100 14 M 14 Eli M 0 10 • Aviyta Utilities • _®IIS_ 1411 East Mission PO Box3727 P45C 25 H,�!WYE: Spakano,Washinntan 992'20.3727 • Utilities • Teltjphnng 509.409.0500 Toll1.1-0 800.72i-9170 Fau,imilc 509-495.8734 • • • • • • May 25,2006 • Mr. Mike}iassingei 11707 B. Sprague Ave, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 RE: Vacation orSTV-02-06 • McMillan St between Euclid Ave and Buckeye Dear Mr-]3assinger: Avista has no utilities in the area to be vacated; therefore, we have no objections. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact.me at(509) 495-8536. Sincerely, Priscill l Sprague 'r • Real Estate A.ssisttut cc: CIaude Kalcr • An affiliate of Avtsin Coro. SjióI Valley 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ® Fax: 509.921.1008 ® cityhall@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Basinger—Associate Planner From: Alysa Wiyrick, E.I.T. —Assistant Development Engineer , , Date: May 24, 2006 `�" Re: STV-02-06 McMillan Road Street Vacation Comments Public Works has reviewed the application to vacate that portion of McMillan Road located between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue. Public Works has no objections to the vacation of this portion of McMillan Road. The proposed development"D4"will provide for the north/south connection between Euclid and Buckeye. This will be provided in a manner that minimizes the possibility of high speed cut through traffic utilizing the new connection. 05/23/06 TUE 14: 09 FAX 509 892 4127 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPT 2002 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire District I 4y. 10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE VALLEY, WA 99206-3676 • (609)925.1700 • FAX(609)892.4125 Mike Thompson Chi 1 May 23, 2006 Mike Basinger City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99205 RE: SIV-02-06 19001 E. Buckeye Dear Mr. Basinger: The Spokane Valley Fire Department has no objections for STV-02-06. The Spokane Valley Fire Department will have comments at time of plat. Sincerely, Rick Freier Fire Inspector RF/mar MAR-14-2006 TUE 02:16 PM FAX NO, P, 01 • • • �� hviSte Utilities 1411 East Mission PO Box;f727 MSC- ./110 . _ Spokane,Washington 34220:372Y Telephone 5139-48s'p56o ! p Tull Free BOO-7274176' tIIItIL'S Facsimile u08-4954734 ' r• • • • March 14, 2006 M .Jeffrey Logan,P.E. Principal USKII 621 W. Mallon, Ste 309 Spokane; WA 99201 R • Vacation of McMillan Road between Euclid and Buckeye Dear Mr.Logan: Avisia has no utilities in the vacation area; therefore?we have no objections. It'you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact me at(509)495-8536. Sincerely, Priscilla Sprague Real Estate Assistant ec; Claude Kalcr l �`RFpr SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMENT Spokane County Fire District 1. . 10319'EAST SPRAGUE AVE, ;'SPOKANE VALLEY,WA 99206-3676 • (509)928-1700` • FAX(509)842-4125 Mike Thompson Chief • March 6, 2006 Jeffrey Logan USKH 621 W. Mallon, Suite 309 Spokane, WA 99201 { RE: McMillan Street Vacation Dear Mr. Logan: The Spokane Valley Fire Department has no objection to this street vacation. As far as utilities are concerned, please check with Consolidated Water District#19, Qwest and Avista. We are not involved with any easements in this area. Please check with the City of Spokane Valley and Spokane County. Sincerely, /J,�/ Kevin Miller Fire Marshal • KM%pla -006 1. .:,: , 4C O IJ N T -Y- UTILITIES UTILITIES DIVISION A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT N.Bruce Rawls,P.E.,Utilities Director March 7, 2006 Jeffrey Logan, P.E. USIHrH Engineering 621 West Mallon, Ste 309 Spokane,WA 99201 RE: Lots N Land Development D-4 Vacation of McMillan Avenue • Dear Jeff. In response to your letter of February 23, 2006,this is to notify you that the Spokane County Division of Utilities has no sanitary sewer facilities within the ( McMillan Avenue right-of-way between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue. Further wore,we do not foresee the need to retain access to this particular right- of-way for the purposes of future sanitary sewer extensions. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 477-7469. Sincerely Mar S tz, Sr. Project Manager 1026 W. Broadway • Spokane, WA 99260-0430 i nn\ err Winn - 1,. n v_ ( r n\ nn 7 ,f 71 - mr-vr . (cnn\ 477 7122 FROM US BEST (TUE) 4. 18' 06 12:5 'T. 12:50/NO. 4862676771 P 2 • 904 N.Columbus Spokane.Washington 992D2 March 23, 2006 . • USKH ATTN: Jeffrey Logan,P.E. Qwest, 621 W Mallon St. Suite 309 Spirit ,t ;��r Spokane,WA 99201 Re: Proposal to vacate McMillan Ave between Euclid Rd and Buckeye Rd for Lots N Lands, LLC housing development#134 Jeffrey, Thanks for contacting Qwest regarding vacating McMillan Rd between Euclid Ave and Buckeye Ave. Qwest does not have any buried or aerial communications facilities in the proposed portion of McMillan Rd to be vacated. Qwest does not currently have any easements along McMillan Rd nor does Qwest require any new easements prior to vacating the right of way. This letter is not an acceptance of the proposed vacation. Qwest Communications expects an official request for concurrence from the City of Spokane Valley. If you have questions regarding this information, feel free to contact me at 509-455-2580. • Sincerely, •7.. :'J Dave Clark Sr.Design Engineer Apr. l8th, 2006 Jeff Logan USKH Engineers 621 W. Mallon Ave. Suite 309 Spokane, WA 99201 RE: Comcast' s concurrence to vacate McMillan Rd. right-of-way north of Buckeye Ave. otherwise known as "D-4" , site of future 80 home development. Dear Jeff : USKH Engineers has Comcast' s concurrence to vacate the McMillan Rd. right-of-way north of Buckeye Ave. otherwise known as "D-4" , site of future 80 home development. Sincerely, Richard Barnes Richard Barnes (509) 484-4931 ext. 53266 richard barnes@cahle .comcast. com Bryan Richardson (509) 484-4931 ext.53240 bryan richardson@cable.comcast . com Butch White (509) 484-4931 ext. 53532 butch white@cable . comcast. com Construction Technicians for Comcast, Spokane UNWIN SCHEBEN KORYNTA HUH IL INC. ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING PRINCIPALS March 28, 2006 Leo von Scheben Earl D.Korynta • James A.Huettl Gary H.Pohl Theodore R.Knuth Kenneth D.Maynard John Hohman, P.E. Gregory A.Ingham City of Spokane Valley Timothy J.Vig 11707 E. Sprague Ave D.Lance Mearig Zane W.Shankrin Spokane Valley, WA 99206 W.Wright Alcorn Jeffrey N.Logan Bruce E.Hopper �ecSubdivision - anRoadVacation—(STV-02-06)t: D4 McMillan STV-02-06 B ) ' Gregory A.Uebl • Arthur J.Johnson Dear John: Gerald V.Neubert We have prepared an application for the vacation of McMillan Road between ASSOCIATES Buckeye and Euclid as part of our D4 Subdivision Development: Steven M.Tjaden John M.Stadum • Joann C.Mitchell As part of the application review, we were asked by the City to contact Spokane Marshall L Hetlet County to see if they had any input about this vacation request. Steven M.Karl Lori A.Kropidlowskl Frederick J.Schwaderer We contacted Pat Harper from the County and he has provided the attached letter Dean ESyta regarding the vacation application. As you can see, it appears that the Count does Daniel Hayhurst Jeff Hagge not have a formal response since they do not-have any ownership interest in the Clichael N.Anderson ROW. .4ary R.Noble Alan E.Gay Julianne M.Hanson Hopefully this letter will be acceptable to the City. Jeffrey M.Potts Brian C.Lewis • Samantha L Emmal Sincerely, RobertJ.Koruna USKH, Inc. Ronald D.Goughnour Shawn C.Lilletjell Peter A.Jacobsen (7)4-'\ • Jeffrey N. Logan, P.E. Principal • Attachment: Spokane County Letter cc: Ken Tupper,LNL,LLC,122 N.Raymond,Spokane Valley,WA 99206 ADDRESS 621 W.Mallon,Ste.309 Work Order. 909500 Spokane,Washington 99201 Phone(509)328-5139 JNL/jnI is\909500-d4 subdivision\correspondence\letter1909500—ltr hohman_vacation— 032806.doc Fax(509)328-0423 h ttp://w,wu.uskh.corn • 7-866-328-5739 OFFICE LOCATIONS Anchorage,Alaska • Fairbanks,Alaska Juneau,Alaska - Casilla,Alaska Lewiston,Idaho , Femdale,Washington Spokane,Washington Walla Walla.Washington sr= t= ' S p O K A N E ar. '±.l•q -.ice- -i Yom' -^ C O U N Y DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT March 21, 2006 USKH Jeffrey Logan,P.E. 1220 N.Howard Street Spokane,WA 99201 RE: Response to March 15, 2006 correspondence regarding McMillan Road Dear Jeff, . McMillan Road between Euclid Avenue and Buckeye Avenue formally became City of Spokane Valley right of way upon incorporation of the City of Spokane Valley on March 31, 2003; prior to that it had been administered as Spokane County right of way including an action by the Board of County Commissioners to close McMillan Road to vehicular traffic, (Resolution 99- 0124).: Spokane County:no longer has any ownership interest in this roadway. Utilities may or may not be within this right of way, through franchise rights a permit to work in the County right of way may have been granted to provide for construction of either overhead'or underground services. Depending on the timing of this request it may have been requested prior to these records being computerized. Spokane County while in possession of this right of way would not have granted easements only franchise rights to locate within this right of way. We would strongly suggest that known franchise utilities be notified to insure that their infra- structure is not being impacted. Thank-you for the opportunity to comment on. this request, but since we do not have an ownership interest this decision we have no formal response to this vacation. Sincerely, Ross E. Kelley,P.E. Spokane Co ,ty Engineer • (30 WILk .0 Pat Harper Engineering Administrator ;: •. •• - ' • - • • 1026 W.Broadway Ave. o Spokane,WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 FAX: (509)477-7655 (2nd Floor)477-7478 (3rd Floor) 0 TDD:(509)477-7133 PRELIMINARY PLAT OF 1mN lvsrmPnR1 p+ TRACTS}I AN'EI Cr PIAT MUM}Cr WEST TABUS IRMOARO TRACK,AS nli onis io BC'T",ERPR rias As Nono eu'w. BEING A SUBDINSIDN OF TRACTS 21 h�1 PER RAT Man(MERRI REMOLD w D'a'R•u eUTs PAu}e. PUT NO.2,Of WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS }ICER(ME BOOM IS MEET Q MALT OON 41 FOR R2EIS.PAKNIIEI Role 1 150•MM.EASEMENT IN THE NW 1 4 OF SECTION 8,TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, NONE 3 aa'eoR'CW[ASLANT RANG 45 EAST,WAUTAETTE MERIDIAN 1AD3�1CHr 1oR1RAc,IS Cu,0 nNAI YPW ARgEANALIflB•r YPERAnweor u ° HOW x RO WRIIOEfl EAsmSxT GO N SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE CO.,WASHINGTON SWAT N RIC COMP"7 SPRIAHE STAT Or WA91WGfOH. NOTE 4 PR BORDER MMERT RAW d WALK IS RAW.UNE LEGAL DESFPRON SdIR[C PER STAIWORY WARRANTY DEM AEN 5151305 NOTE a PROPOSm[ASLI[NT IM NW STATION J II I I L 1 / TRACT 40 �'� l lIn. r/J I I 3C]v TR ACT 22 SNORT PUT Na 5A-53T ROPos['vAcen'x_�/,= MT. gOOK,- Cr SNORT PIANS.PAG[53 °I I - 1 1 ( .. 12m .2m ;2m �1 , -�_ti _ i LEGEND �E� 2A11 . °° / � ..1 hl p / '-p -a 1 iI b ,,5,\ �N 8 �s ` �� T°� `� I I 1111 i -w- PO.POE OHM UR I M 1 a /a O.b W b p1 h p1• .q/ i 4 n. - \�'q W 4- - 12101 OCR pp A�1 I s Pa F� ° a 8 a tl C 0 �^ d q 3 9w ° \ \ - J / r\}\ mzm I I I L e EmnroC10N59 RA-1 d"'q1 �A / �' S /�� 9;; ?q �;: //' ° i --\`�---__ 1 `' �, - - ` k d 11 1 �l q 1 --'-_ -L_.1 _; m �1 C t"q M p 1 I I %t msTND in MAK U 14 i I -/I--- --O- °° --?u_1 --"---I�S �_-t �s=9 // J b9 (I1 I 'I \' I DY 1-1-1 mm GAS VALK vunrmnm I _ L5� a .. .E n .m ,. 1 •bio AE u�--�-�s f �j 7 s�-au°• 10.yp 211 ua. 0.,f`• /`' ' e I I I a EOM arenaREMI .a4A m PEI. �� "-t f _ _ * `• ;t'r _ _.-T•° '4+ n p h Q I 1 I 1 • FM=RUM f CM AS NORD ♦i-tis - S— r { m.12 s.m' _.9$41• '� _ -1'1lj li I - I 4Pr+ >O q SQ CORK.CALCULI PG I I Ca 13 1$41,• I`rP� ----1�% i - -rt- oa II 1�i " y� �a I1•- /...0', n I A�� U tT 10111 -_-F1=—'T __ ,fes, 1 a /"' I I p II .1'r--- - ---T o\ ap I "d y I I� 7I nI2 .-22 IIB , ili I $ J 1 .�'I---- I p 1 I 11 I-n A ,,, II I '� i y9 1 0 11 ...1\I I •m ` I I + o II - 1 "a I q 1 e1 1a„Ip 1 I �'� / �� 1 1 mom- 111 I " 1 ..-h At, I I i �s Ig1 `'h VI �2 II 1 g11nm,/ I •I I 1 glom' I a l sl q II¢ D I I \ I aI q . �� I'I 9 I / q I I i I a "7 1 1 3 � I t4 / p, 1., I .1-7-y_ / 1----,ItI 1:1 1 R4 g aPa M a° � °� 1 I p I I li 11 bJ LI 1a I �° lu 1 1 / I ...N.-37,-z.-__t -�'� 1 1 I9a- II c t } I I / to / b I �, Ila 1"y I q 4 5� I i 1 nm' 10 m' I \\ 1n °p27-�R.t—t1 !—= Ili' [..' I J � �I I I I I p 1 II, e S W. °„,,'• 1 I / ° •I nTRACT 21 I I TRACT 41 I.n X11 I ,n-, ejooiI 7i• II b d o a 5, q 9” 1 I `.� I -.aIo " / 12 _ Iu =,,i ,`:.1° -1----/`,• i 1 it 1 6°11 X11 q � I y 4.....,„„ I �~ �1� 1�1 m� O Ism• �1 11 nm' O II I 1I np Inc 111 I Iib • �b 1 I I„jllj j a , ,I A 1Rm I I ' I a d I 1 a n s' 1 Iy �a1? f 9$ I ; I I I I I I \ a a 11 9 ' tut 11 I �� ~” I 11 q tI I I I 'wEM ii}x�n wbio muRT I \ d I I g I 0 a I t I " 1 1 x I I m' 1 m I { " A10 1 I I I DEER A L VALLEY.WA RR1W I \ a 11 m 1 I I ) I I 1PIRI R}1-1]N e 1 / I m. .R� ° I Iw I A I k ! I \ ,m I k I a U -p 1 tl i I a rA ^p A 'pp !I Ili I 9AepW[k xINH[M A LAMER 1 I / I x -d Y d c 9, r° gs kk I.N.r1•IZ I 111 1, 111 - I S I I ° I.I 113 N.RATUOW Ed1Ri I .p I I. I I -b I •A ii'u m' E' �q 7 III i I J ,\1>A 1 1 ¢III I (5 N111-1211.WA aR}ae 1 ` fb 9 I I�R Id d I_ q �� 14 1�?x m,,� L __-_- �r'd I ' .- - � --*�•II `\\A. mn .II 1\ °I 31 /�9 _ a I� i � _ — a---- J r .�1 iia �'�o __ �%' d. �� al J e r eq 19 1 I\1�nuoEr 12 1 1 __C i 1 _II L •?., 4, , 6 y �___AN� A A 4 III I y ay'/ 1aZ 1412 0°4VrA ,airo�,-��-5 I _ " �E—� s�—� 7 g Q �I,mil1-� smEET •u SECTION INf by } I -�l�g-�_ n y 21.71_..'04. �k I`'r..}}x$.-a1-__'_^ .. �.4. \`=t "j 'Rti �q I I iIII I ©■ �E I ( ` 7711.1 ..m• Wm ____-F- Sm -__ �•• �, tTP -°_ � \ b III. .■■■ Pg � {'o�'----t- ------i ------ �( y 1.- •to/ mql I -a j ,.n ye .1b r. �A g 6 I iIs•4"• NMI.' -1 I�` J >3 .b Alt >� nh 3 ry�1}, I I � - L� r.a - F X I I 1I II �B ]O' 30':1 "-A )„.1„.4... A - A /9A A ��'S ` �\ q O .�1°T`� 1 ■■■■ C. 1 1 , 1 2 - /.99 �. �,.� / q r\� i� 1 I' ]i('\ k-' u., 10 1 �� •W �M MU.C I1\i :1 1 q / U C X1' I OW 1//Or 05110 e ._ • / * °OMI-TRE ESTATES n5 d I I'‘. 1 I 11511.515 C.WY. I ° 36'22' d BOOM 15 V PUTS,PAGE I !fide I I' a I/Y a YEAOOYT RW AC01R011 / / d @FFFMR W `�i I 1 4I�y� ' L TAP Wad `11i T wax xa euts,Po•to nqy �� TRACT 42 71 1 I U�° np &17 111..1-i E� IMI 10•a x' A l Ero^..,,,• N }" STZ ".. fa TRACT 20 rm ammE am ,_299.,..,..-7_-----LADI I 're..'�' j i1 ]u1 ]5' __.________._.,,, ,,,___ ________.p,----.---•-•--- -WW�—W �l -�� ®In lc+ I Tolwrt 201 Z �\ GRAPHIC SCALE \ RADS DY SEAMNR SOSRONI53.R �•^ 1x''°'°xl�;;-'iii DARTEI]/Ii/05 ❑i.mN:Mei]w1.u /-, ,I, T NI A59wIE0 BCMYO 0r NB99R•09'W ttl TIC REM. 1/11/06 +m1 312-0111-1112 , ry � ` r�—� --, Or ULAOO NJIC EU=SECIMI S AS PEP MAND Ita C PLAT Tom• iA 1 }-R1 I Ix an 1 OF UTAnORLwx Anw'W SHEET 2 OF 2 USKH W.O.509500 i•5M Department of Community Development iim ai Ih �. Planning Division Staff Report and Recommendations to th Planning Commission STV-02-06 Street Vacation Request June S.2006 STV-02-06 S=- ..- Department of Community Development jVallc Planning Division Vicinity Map If`" y '', 1 %!jj?jI _ ---\ ,d es,T� ill do ke_e. - — •a � uu—ii u u � �r i,;;yv \ 111.10,,,,42;- June S.2006 STV-02-06 1 Department`of Community Development £� j. 0 _ Planning Division Proposed Vacation 1 /. tio r 1256.5'i ° PaE;.r .,52.01.3, i a 7. x A r. ir= '.— 30'wide ` .. ..• '--i; 'I' -- ',.� I_i, ' f • F Y ;` iw _ _ �&. 7,W-!- ► i lune S.2006 ST\'-02-06 SpOl:anc Department of Community Development . 1 ! j�attc Planning Division Application Processing Application Submittal = March 13, 2006 Determination of Completeness = March 26. 2006 Public Hearing set by City Council = May 9. 2006 Posting of Public Hearing = May 18, 2006 Published Notice of Public Hearing = May 19 & 26. 2006 Mailed Notice of Public Hearing = May 19, 2006 Public Hearing = June 8, 2006 lune S.2006 STV-02-06 2 Ste/\. Department of Community Development Ilmigiiito, Planning Division Facing north on Buckeye Avenue ROAD CLOSED{ .01116111611t4, _- . .0, _ vitiosrOmr,:,,,ii.......to.,... . . 1 .1 tdiftir .M, -L X,,,,pa e ,r 104 Ayr., 1 :.;4._ . `{ "tar V.: . ry -:'. .., :7-'4-'4.. �� -k r�� '1:i P �` ➢:1:,..r; fry F;� H� ` �, fY J.�'�r*u' -441. .4 �' 1, , ,K,} n,41,� a� ,.. ",_ ..tea. w. i June S.2006 Sitl-02-06 of munity Spn okane �` Department� Planning DivisioDeveiopmente� Facing South on Euclid Avenue f _ 2nd Posting - t4.- McMiliaq ;.e a __----.—.-___ — J 3 .0 ,11e Department of Community Development • ---,. Planning Division - . \ • 1 °i i _ I fi _.I I 1.1 S� i1 I Lots T ,and5F` ' 8 LI ,C S( g ?ro`�ose 1 S1,13 isi • June 8.2_006 ISparse - Department of Community Development ...0°YaationiffiporPlanning Division Findings & Conclusions: P.,,,.,. - , Pee.,032.0124 - - ; 6 _ .., Fes.. P �I i1-.)11 t• i ill 1 i; ✓1. t. Geis :i,,'t: r L _ June 8.2006 STV-02-06 4 5pr Department of Community Development rU.unc Planning Division Staff Recommendation Conditionally approve STV-02-06 See Conditions of approval a-f lune 8.2006 5 CITY •F SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Planning Commission Action Meeting Date: 8 June 2006 City Manager Sign-off: Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business /1 public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE : Public Hearing to Amend Spokane Valley Municipal Code; Chapter 10.05 Article II. Construction Work and Activity Within Right-of-Way GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Chapter 10.05 Article II. Construction Work and Activity Within Right-of-Way PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Ordinance 03-063, Ordinance 06-005, Master Fee Schedule 2006 BACKGROUND: On 6 December 2005 Staff presented a short PowerPoint presentation concerning the Right of Way Pavement Cut Policy. On 11 April 2006 Staff continued that presentation to Council itemizing the types of changes proposed for Chapter 10.05 Article II Construction Work and Activity Within Right-of-Way. Council directed Staff to work with our Legal Department to determine proposed language referenced in that meeting. The amendment to this section of the Municipal Code incorporates that direction and will accomplish three things: 1. Definitively accepts the performance bond that accompanies a Washington Labor and Industries Contractor's License as adequate for small pavement patches. 2. Establishes a time frame for the duration of an Obstruction Permit that accounts for the winter closure of the local asphalt plants. 3. Substitutes standard language into this Article reflecting the City's current method of enforcement for civil violations. The amendments are shown underlined in bold, italicized font in the attached draft copy of SVMC Ordinance No 06- A State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Checklist was completed by Building Official Scholtens and a Determination of Non Significance (DNS) was accomplished by Community Development Director Sukup. A request for expedited review was forwarded to the Community Trade and Economic Development Department (CTED) and was granted on 23 May 2006. Notice of the DNS and this Public Hearing was published in the legal notices of Valley News Herald on May 19. The Draft Ordinance has been reviewed and approved by City Legal Department. OPTIONS: Conduct Public Hearing, and at the conclusion of the hearing, provide Staff with direction. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Close Public Hearing. "I recommend approval." BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: N/A STAFF CONTACT: Building Official Scholtens ATTACHMENTS CTED e-mail DNS Draft Ordinance The City of Spokane Valley The Sprague/Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan Community Vision, Plan Framework, Regulatory Policy Et Implementation Plan Scope of Services 4May 2006 Project Overview The Sprague/Appleway Corridor Revitalization Strategy and Subarea Plan project will determine and implement a clear vision for growth and change along the Sprague/Appleway Corridor—probably the most visible portion of the City of Spokane Valley.The Corridor includes properties facing and between Sprague and Appleway,from I-90 on the west to Sullivan on the east. The specific configuration that new public and private investment along the Corridor will take will be determined by a planning process involving city officials,citizens,stakeholders,and City Staff. Specifications to guide land use and development intensity, site layout,building design,site landscaping and signage will be detailed in the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan document. Land use and development standards contained in the Subarea Plan will be drafted to replace pre-existing zoning regulations,and to assist the community to more effectively attract investment and improve the evolving image and identity of the City. The consultant team(also referred to as the Consultant or the Project Team)consists of ECONorthwest(ECO),Freedman Tung&Bottomley(FTB),Glatting Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart,Inc.(GJ),and Studio Cascade(SC). Meeting Types Core Team Composition and Working Sessions To achieve the benefits that the professional city staff members can contribute to the planning effort,we recommend the assembly of a five to seven member"Core Team"to collaborate with the ECO/FTB consulting team throughout the project. Recommended mandatory members are the Community Development Director and the Public Works Director. Each should choose another member of his/her department to attend as well. Since traffic circulation is a very important issue in this project,the traffic engineer would be the recommended second representative from the Public Works Department. The City Manager's participation as a key member of the Core Team is also recommended. We also recommend the assignment of a Project Manager by the Community Development Director,who would be a member of the Core Team as well as the City's primary point of contact for regular project communications. The Core Team must be active at all key junctures of the project,attending all community workshops and City Council Study Sessions,participating in the Core Team Working Sessions(outlined below),and actively participating in the development or review of the Subarea Plan concepts and contents. The Core Team is responsible for coordinating with "Non-Core Team"people in their own departments,bringing to Core Team discussions the perspectives of those"Non- Cores,"and conveying to the Non-Cores the results of the Core Team process. It is essential to the continuity of the project and the Core Team's credibility with the rest of City Staff that the members of the Core Team do not change over the course of various project meetings. Core Team Working Sessions. As part of the Concept Phase,ECO and FTB will orchestrate a Core Team Working Session, focused on the review&analysis of existing conditions along the corridor,and on development of preliminary concepts for the primary organization of the centers and segments along the envisioned future Corridor. If time allows, preliminary transportation planning and street design issues supportive of the desired land use&development concepts will also be discussed. Prior to each Community Workshop,consultant presentations will be previewed by the Core Team to check for errors and to refine the presentation details. Later in the project,when the draft Subarea Plan is prepared,the Core Team will take primary responsibility for review of its contents and for coordinating its review with other member of City Staff. Each Core Team Working Session will involve the participation of the Core Team plus ECO/FTB team project staff as needed. In addition to intensive face-to-face Core Team Working Sessions,telephone conferences will be held with the Core Team at various junctures throughout the project to insure that staff and consultants are"on the same page"and to provide an opportunity to air ideas,concerns and to discuss project logistics. Focus Groups There are several important groups of stakeholders with an interest in the redevelopment of Sprague/Appleway Corridor. At the beginning of the second phase of the project,the ECO/FTB Team will hold a day of focused meetings with representatives of these groups to ensure that these key perspectives are understood by the consultant team. The exact make up of these meetings will be determined with City Staff in the early phases of the project but may include: representatives of Auto Row and other key land owners along the corridor,public transit agency staff and other institutional stakeholders,and key community representatives. Community Workshops. Community workshops are publicly noticed meetings open to anyone in the community who wishes to be a part of the planning for the Sprague/Appleway Corridor. The public participation process proposed herein has been developed over twenty years of community participation workshop facilitation by Freedman Tung&Bottomley. It is based on the observation that workshop participants will only enthusiastically support plans that they understand and believe in. Workshop series blend educational with participation techniques. Educational components are engaging presentations that bring participants up to speed with regard to the effective means by which properties can maximize their value while contributing to enhanced livability and city identity. City Council Study Sessions At key junctures in the development of the plan elements and outcomes,the Project Team will bring the recommendations developed thus far for informal review and discussion by the City Council. The purpose of these Study Sessions is to involve city decision-makers in the discussion of the contents of the plan as it is being developed rather than waiting to the end. These meetings are held in informal study session arrangement rather than in the more formal arrangement of typical public hearings. Study Sessions will ensure that we have City Council's advice and review both during and after key plan concepts are developed,so that we are certain that City Council members will ultimately receive a plan in the hearing phase that implements their vision for the Corridor. Deliverables and review The Consultants will provide the City with outlines of key documents in advance.The City and Consultant will agree on those outlines,which will then become part of the basis for determining the adequacy of the draft of each specified deliverable.For agreed upon deliverables,written and graphic,the Consultant will provide the City with a draft, and then with a final after receiving City comments.Final deliverables will generally be delivered within ten working days of receiving in writing from the City a single,consolidated set of comments that give clear direction on needed and desired changes. Some products will be delivered to the City at scheduled review meetings before Workshops: in that case, necessary revisions per the City request may occur after the ensuing Workshops. An accompanying table shows deliverables,meetings,and schedule. Overview of the Planning Process (Diagram) The accompanying diagram—Overview of the Planning Process—illustrates the choreography of these meeting types within each phase. It expresses the chronological order in which we intend to hold discussions with the community, develop preliminary content,and then review and refine that content in collaboration with the Core Team,in collaboration with citizens and,ultimately,with the City Council. Scope of Work,Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 2 Work Program The Task List below describes the services to be carried out by the entire consulting team. Tasks are listed in the chronological order that is assumed will be most effective for both the development of planning&design solutions,as well as for the provision of a satisfying process of collaboration with City Staff and community participation. As the project proceeds,the order of tasks may be modified to suit opportunities that arise during the course of the planning and design process. The dates below and in the attached schedule for deliverables are approximate and assume the Consultant has authorization to begin work by May 15,2006. PHASE I. CLARIFYING COMMUNITY ASPIRATIONS AND DEFINING OPPORTUNITIES FOR BENEFICIAL CHANGE (MAY—JULY,2006) Purpose of this Phase: Develop an understanding of the existing conditions and the forces of development and change that produced them. Involve the community in that learning process.Discuss and clarify community aspirations for revitalization in the context of learning what can reasonably be accomplished,particularly in the near term. Task 1. Project Start-up Project start-up tasks encompass administrative coordination between all consulting firms and between the consulting team and City Staff,including the collection of required base information and maps of the study area,formation of the Core Team,exchange of contact information,communications protocols and initial meeting scheduling. Task 2. Existing Conditions Inventory and Basemap Preparation Field Reconnaissance and Photography FTB will conduct initial field reconnaissance,including preliminary assessment of apparent vulnerability to change,an inventory of development types, and supplementary photography(i.e. supplementary to the primary photographic record assembled by Studio Cascade)necessary,and will set up a project database of slides,field notes&sketches that can be made available to the team. Policy Context Studio Cascade will obtain documents,studies and plans pertinent to the Sprague/Appleway Corridor(with assistance from ECO),concentrating its review on the policies,capital facilities and land use issues impacting the planning area. Studio Cascade will submit to the planning team our assessment of these issues,as well as a comprehensive collection of current photographs,to help inform the rest of the planning process. Studio Cascade will also compile and maintain a library of GIS data provided by the City of Spokane Valley,making all the material available to the planning team as a coordinated GIS data set. Studio Cascade will assemble a report on the existing policy environment and its impact on land use and capital facilities and will provide a collection of photographs of the study area illustrating issues raised in the initial evaluation plus those areas likely to be studied in more depth as the project continues. In addition to receiving and reviewing the Summary Report on Previous Sprague/Appleway Corridor studies completed SC,FTB will review the zoning code and Comprehensive Plan,as well as any other policy documents conditioning development on Corridor properties. An Existing Zoning diagram will also be formatted to provide a comparison with policy change proposals developed in the second Phase of the Subarea Plan project. City Context and Structure of Neighborhoods Contiguous w/the Corridor In consultation with city staff,FTB will prepare diagrams illustrating the city context, as well as the neighborhood structure close in to the Corridor. Existing&Planned Development The pattern of existing development—building footprints,uses in existing buildings, and the pattern of streets&blocks— will be partially mapped by City Staff and provided to the consulting team. SC will complete the mapping,adding building footprints,streets&blocks not included in the basemap provided by the City. SC will also inventory and map ground-level Scope of Work, Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 3 uses in existing buildings. FTB will provide SC with standard land use categories and corresponding color coding key,and will coordinate with SC regarding the organization of the electronic files into discrete layers of data. FTB will format the data received from SC into a variety of basemaps for use throughout the project. FTB will also receive and add to the mapped data any approved development projects not yet on the ground,and will review any unapproved major development proposals underway as provided by the City,so that development being contemplated by investors will be considered as part of the development of the plan framework. Right-of-Way: Streetscape Configuration Based on a dimensioned street right-of-way base map received from the City,FTB will prepare plan&cross-section diagrams of typical corridor segments for use in Core Team and Community Workshop presentations and discussions. These documents will also be forwarded to Glatting Jackson for their collaboration on street design issues. Character,Design and Historic Context and Public Realm The character,design and historic context of the Corridor will also be assessed. FTB will review information received from the City describing the urban design and architectural history of the City and Corridor,any existing or assembled inventory of significant(or favorite)buildings and places that are considered key contributors to the identity of the City. FTB will format these images for use in Community Workshops and in portions of the plan document to be assembled in Phase III. Mobility,Access & Connectivity Gladding Jackson Kercher Anglin Lopez Rinehart,Inc.(GJ)will serve as the transportation liaison for the project to address mobility and access to meet the multimodal needs of the project and bridge the process with the City's Department of Public Works(DPW)and their consultants(it is assumed that coordination with transit agencies other than the City will be provided by DPW). The City will provide GJ with a scaled electronic aerial map of the City and a digital planimetric base map of the study area. GJ will plot this aerial and base map at various scales and use it to present the traffic analysis and design considerations developed during the project.Glatting Jackson will review relevant current data and background studies received from Spokane Valley DPW on corridor traffic,transit,pedestrian,and bicycle planning. Glatting Jackson will be provided existing and future year traffic data for those roadway segments and intersections within the study area. Traffic data will be obtained from the City of Spokane Valley and CH2M Hill. It is desired that traffic data collected be less than one year old. Roadway segment counts shall be ADT and include K and D factors. Intersection turning movement counts shall be for AM and PM peak hours. Glatting Jackson will review CH2M Hill existing condition Synchro traffic simulation for the corridor. Glatting Jackson will use information and mapping provided by CH2M Hill to create an existing conditions map for vehicular,transit,pedestrian,and bicycle circulation patterns and amenity needs related to the redevelopment of the corridor. Glatting Jackson will coordinate to production of these maps with FTB and the City of Spokane Valley. FTB will review information received from GJ,and will follow-up with questions and discussion as required. Utility Infrastructure FTB will review infrastructure information,received from the City with regard to a utility infrastructure issues that might conceivably constrain development along the corridor. This is a very limited review;this Scope of Services assumes that any utility infrastructure planning that the City would like to address in the Subarea Plan will be provided by the City's DPW. Environmental/Ecological Factors FTB will review reports received from the City about any soils contamination,Brownfield Sites or ecological factors that may be relevant to planning land use and development along the Corridor. Scope of Work, Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 4 Task 3.Analysis of Existing Conditions Market Opportunities & Constraints ECO will draft parts of a technical memorandum evaluating markets and City financial capacity and options. FTB will review the technical memorandum received from ECO and will discuss the contents and its implications for the Corridor revitalization strategy in a teleconference. Mobility: Traffic Capacity and Couplet Planning Issues FTB will be briefed by the City,CH2MHi11,and/or GJ on couplet scenarios previously studied for the future corridor as well as with regard to existing or projected capacity constraints on future development or street design scenarios,and hold preliminary discussions with city staff and GJ about potential capacity constraints on development and street design as well as potential transit system effects on development. GJ,in conjunction with FTB,the City of Spokane Valley and CH2M,will create a transportation issues memorandum. This memorandum will document the issues needed to be addressed to create an integrated transportation and land use strategy for the redevelopment of the corridor. This memorandum will illustrate how transportation issues should be integrated into the planning effort as well as identifying areas of needed flexibility in the current transportation and land use expectations for the corridor. GJ will also provide as-needed informal teleconferences with FTB and the City of Spokane. Vulnerability to change FTB will conduct fieldwork to assess the apparent vulnerability of sites along the corridor. Apparent opportunity sites will be mapped and forwarded to the ECO and City Staff for review. These findings will be discussed as needed and modified based on the response from ECO and City Staff. Street design character and functionality assessment FTB will assess the character and functionality of the existing street design along various typical segments of Sprague Avenue and Appleway Boulevard. PHASE II: ENVISIONING THE FUTURE CORRIDOR—PLAN CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT (JULY 2006 TO JANUARY 2007) Purpose of this Phase: Investigate potential futures for the Corridor and the new City Center,focusing particularly on developing recommendations that will serve to enhance the economic prospects for the corridor,that will put the high quality of the community on display and that will enhance the overall identity of the central spine of the City. Assist the community to understand the various directions that it can reasonably aspire to grow and change,and to evaluate those options with respect to potential impacts on the form,character and economy of the city. Assist the community to select the best possible(and achievable)future,to define that direction in sufficient detail,and to describe it in a way that is appealing to potential investors. Task 1. Focus Groups ECO,FTB,GJ and SC —with the assistance of City Staff—will conduct a half-day-long series of focus groups with auto dealership owners and other stakeholder groups to garner their perspective about the future of the Corridor. Task 2. Core Team (City Staff+Consultants)Full Day Working Session (same trip as Focus Groups) At the completion of the existing conditions inventory&analysis,but prior to the development of any consultant recommendations or alternatives, the consultant team will join the City Staff Core Team for a full day working session. This meeting will happen as part of the same trip the Consultants make for the Focus Groups(Task 1).The purpose of this working session will be to develop a shared approach to the primary issues and questions on which the project will initially focus,such as the alternative locations for the City Center district,the primary options for future neighborhood centers,the ability to realistically plan for Corridor segments that are internally consistent and cohesive in terms of use and physical form,and preliminary perspectives with regard to the extension or non-extension of Appleway to Sullivan Road. ECO will coordinate meeting logistics with City Staff,and FTB will prepare basemaps and a PowerPoint file/presentation on existing conditions for use during the day. Scope of Work, Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 5 If alternative transportation solutions are identified at this stage of the process,GJ will coordinate with CH2MHill on the development of alternative corridor micro-simulations. Task 3. Corridor Centers& Segments: "Broad-Brush"Alternatives and Tradeoffs Based on the plan concepts developed in the Core Team Full Day Working Session(Task 2, above),FTB will develop and diagram corridor-scale alternatives and tradeoffs for the retrofitting of the broad pattern of land use&development along the corridor. These preliminary concepts will include alternate locations for the new City Center district,and the pattern of centers and long corridor segments that correspond to alternate city center locations(as well as other factors).FTB will assemble photographs from their library to illustrate the type of development corresponding to these broad-brush concepts. FTB will also prepare diagrams illustrating the recommended plan area boundaries(i.e.the boundaries of the area that the Subarea Plan will be applied to). Finally,FTB will prepare cross-sections of the development corridor to demonstrate existing and desired relationships of new development to the thoroughfare. ECO will complete the economic,market,and financial analysis.ECO will prepare a technical memorandum,suitable as an appendix to the final plan,describing economic,market,and financial conditions(past,existing,and likely future),and the implications for the type and location of development in different parts of the Corridor. Glatting Jackson will coordinate the evaluation of the initial transportation framework with testing and evolution of the overall framework with FTB and the City of Spokane Valley and CH2M Hill. This on-going task will also coordinate alternative micro-simulations(if necessary)with CH2M Hill,the City of Spokane Valley and FTB. Studio Cascade will assist ECO and FTB as necessary to act as project liaison and to attend meetings and present project information to local civic groups,agencies and others as determined in the public participation program. They will periodically review proposed designs and implementation plans to ensure compliance with the State's growth management act and prevailing local laws and policies and will work with the consultant team to identify priority projects and establish specific action strategies to guide implementation. This Task includes the development of all necessary diagrams and photographs necessary for presentation and discussion at Community Workshop#1,to be prepared primarily by FTB. Task 4. Community Workshop#1: "Broad-Brush"Alternatives & Tradeoffs ECO and FTB will prepare a workshop process and needed presentation and other materials to engage workshop participants in a review and discussion of potential futures for the overall broad pattern of land use&development along the Corridor. ECO and FTB will take part in a review session with the City Staff Core Team on the day of the workshop. In the evening,ECO and FTB will set-up,present and facilitate Community Workshop#1. The Team will record comments made by workshop participants and transmit a record of these comments to the City. Task 5. Centers: Conceptual Alternatives for City Center and Neighborhood Centers FTB and ECONorthwest will participate in a teleconference to consult with City Staff Core Team about the most desirable and achievable anatomy of the new City Center district,and will discuss the economics,land use and development patterns related to the overall pattern of envisioned centers(i.e.City Center plus neighborhood centers)along the Corridor. The refinement of the location and configuration of the neighborhood centers identified in the Comprehensive Plan will also be discussed. Based on this conversation as well as on the results of Community Workshop#1,FTB will prepare diagrams, illustrations,and recommendations for the design of City Center and for the development parameters of the neighborhood centers,and will assemble photographs corresponding to the envisioned development contained in these recommendations, as needed.FTB will also refine the"Broad-Brush"Centers&Segments diagrams,originally prepared in Task 4 per community workshop&City Staff direction. . Task 6. Community Workshop#2: Envisioning the City's New Centers FTB will prepare a workshop presentation and materials to distribute as well as coordinate logistics with Team. FTB and ECO will take part in a review session with the City Staff Core Team on the day of the workshop and then attend,set-up, and facilitate community workshop#2. Concepts for the composition and location of the City's new centers will be presented and then discussed. During the workshop,the consulting team will record comments and as a follow-up they will transmit these comments to ECO for distribution to the Core Team. Scope of Work,Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 6 Task 7.Joint City Council &Planning Commission Study Session On the evening immediately following the second Community Workshop,the ECO/FTB Team will present the results of the community workshops and a progress report on the evolving plan framework and the alternatives under review at a Joint City Council&Planning Commission Study Session. The purpose of this session is to inform the City Council as to the primary conceptual direction that the project has taken thus far,and to avail the City Staff/Consulting Team of any comments that Councilmembers or Commissioners might have at this formative stage in the project. The objective is to make sure that Councilmembers generally approve of the contents of the preliminary plan framework or to receive direction from City Council as to the changes that need to be made to the primary plan concepts in order for Councilmembers to be able to support the ultimate plan contents that will come back to them at various stages later in the project. Task 8. Develop/Refine Street Design and Transportation Planning Concepts Core Team Working Session. FTB and GJ will participate in a transportation and design work session with the City Staff Core Team. This work session will focus on the development and/or refinement(depending on what was developed in the Task 2 Core Team Full Day Working Session,described above)of design solutions for the Corridor that support the envisioned City Center,neighborhood centers,cohesive long corridor segments developed in the earlier sessions. Design solutions to be discussed at the session will include intersection modifications,roadway streetscape,pedestrian amenities and potential bicycle facilities. Subsequent to the Work Session,FTB will prepare street design diagrams,illustrations,and recommendations,and will collaborate with GJ in the assembly of photographs corresponding to street design recommendations. Task 9. Community Workshop#3—Street Design and Transportation Planning in Support of the Community's Vision for the Corridor FTB will coordinate workshop logistics and presentations with City Staff&GJ, especially presentation regarding couplet configuration options,if appropriate. FTB will collaborate with GJ on a joint presentation of the primary alternatives and recommendations. On the day of the Community Workshop,FTB and GJ will present all recommendations to the City Staff Core team for review and comment,and in the evening the consulting team will set up,present,facilitate,and record participant comments at the third Community Workshop. Task 10. Complete Plan Framework: Prepare final concept level recommendations,diagrams,and illustrations At the outset of this task,the consultant team will conduct a Working Teleconference to discuss refinements to the final concept level recommendations,diagrams,and illustrations. The masterplan for City Center will be refined and modified per the input received at this meeting,as well as from Community Workshops 2 and 3,and will be forwarded to ECO for pro forma analysis. FTB will discuss the findings of that analysis with ECO and will prepare a modified City Center Master Plan recommendation if the pro forma analysis leads us to conclude that adjustments are necessary. FTB will prepare key policy recommendations and illustrations for segments of the Corridor based on the"broad-brush"centers and segments decisions made earlier and on the results of the community workshop series and Core Team discussions. Additional relevant photos corresponding to envisioned development types for centers and segments will be assembled as needed. Transportation planning,street design and other capital improvement recommendations will be modified,refined and finalized in consultation with GJ. Task 11.Joint City Council &Planning Commission Study Session ECO and FTB will present the results of the community workshops and our recommended plan framework for the Corridor at a Joint City Council&Planning Commission Study Session. The purpose of this session is to inform the City Council as to the primary conceptual direction that the project has taken,and to summarize the comments received from community workshop participants relative to those recommendations. The primary purpose of this Study Session is to make sure that Councilmembers approve the primary recommendations"in concept,"or to take direction from City Council as to the changes that need to be made to the primary plan concepts in order for Councilmembers to approve the Subarea Plan's intent. This stage of plan concept review is critical prior to the preparation of any draft Subarea Plan documents,in order to avoid major delays and costs associated with the more typical process of City Council review of detailed policy proposals in the Public Hearing Phase. Scope of Work, Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 7 PHASE III: IMPLEMENTING COMMUNITY INTENT—THE SUBAREA PLAN (FEBRUARY— MAY 2007) Purpose of this Phase: Having defined the desired future beneficial growth and change for the Corridor and designated City Center location, collaborate with City Staff to define the means by which it can most effectively work toward the attainment of that future. Develop policy tools that can be used at the City's Planning Desk to insure that private investment takes the desired physical form. Prepare materials that will encapsulate the community's vision for revitalization. Clarify the public investment that the community intends to implement over time to stimulate and complement private investment. Display and describe all elements of the Plan in a way that is appealing to potential investors and that makes the process of project development,review and approval as efficient as possible Task 1. Develop Coding System FTB will determine the primary organizing system for regulatory policies in the Subarea Plan,prepare charts and diagrams for primary regulatory control for Corridor Segments and Districts. Task 2.Prepare Administrative Review Draft Subarea Plan The Administrative Plan(also know as"The Consultant Draft")is the first draft of the Sprague/Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan. This first draft contains all consultant recommendations for the contents of the Plan, and is prepared for the purpose of City Staff review,revision and addition. As such,this version of the plan is not meant for public review,since it will not yet have benefited from contributions from professional City Staff which are crucial to the development of a final Public Review Draft Plan. FTB will prepare the Administrative Draft,and will coordinate with ECO, SC and GJ with regard to their preparation of specialized sections within the plan document. FTB will prepare a table of contents,introductory section,a report on the primary plan framework developed in Phase H of the project,land use&development regulations and design guidelines. ECO will prepare an implementation plan section that expands on its various recommendations in Phase II,which will include an assessment of how the City can coordinate its land use,transportation,and economic development planning to help create"win-win"situations with private property owners and maximize the potential for public/private partnerships. ECO will also provide recommendations as to how public-private partnerships might be assembled to launch some of the development described in the Concept Plan. GJ will prepare the draft transportation element of the Plan. FTB will review that draft,discuss any modifications needed with GJ. Glatting Jackson will coordinate the development of the draft transportation element of the sub area plan with FTB and the City of Spokane Valley. More specifically,the Subarea Plan will include the following sections: Introduction: Purpose;Authority;Plan Area;Plan Organization Book I: Community Intent(includes pictures and illustrations) A. Starting Point:Existing Conditions at time of Plan Adoption(with portions by SC,ECO and GJ) B. Intended Outcomes including Plan Goals,The Envisioned Future Corridor and Implementation Strategy(the latter in collaboration with ECO) Book II:Development Regulations(includes regulatory diagrams and charts) A. Orientation/Applicability B. Site Development Standards C. Street and Open Space Standards&Guidelines D. Parking Standards&Guidelines(in consultation with GJ) E. Architectural Standards&Design Guidelines F. Signage Standards&Guidelines Book III:Planned City Actions A. Capital Improvement Programs B. Public Parking Facilities C. Mobility(provided by G7 in collaboration with City of Spokane Valley DPW and CH2MHil1) D. Utilities(provided by the City DPW,if needed) Scope of Work,Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 8 E. Implementation(portion having to do with the Development Approval Process to be provided by the City DCD) Appendices(as needed) Document production will be carried out by FTB and will include document design and formatting,cover design, annotation and formatting of full page graphic illustrations,as well as the production of electronic PDF files and one hard copy master for delivery to the city or for printing of the number of copies ordered by the City. Note: Printing expenses will be charged separately without any markup;this project budget does not include expenses for printing document copies). SC will assist in the development of the implementation plan to ensure that it includes the steps necessary to ensure staff, planning commission, City Council,community and property owner support of the draft Subarea Plan. Studio Cascade will attend meetings with stakeholders and interest groups as necessary to gain support for the plan and guide its implementation,as directed by ECO and FTB. Task 3. Plan Orientation Session with Planning Staff FTB will hold a session with the Core Team and additional Planning and Public Works staff of Spokane Valley to orient them to the contents and regulatory mechanisms of the Subarea Plan. BUDGET The budget for these services is summarized in the following table.Attachments provide detail,by firm,by person,by phase. Budget by Phase&Firm Labor Phase I Phase II Phase III TOTAL ECONorthwest $15,000 $38,170 $10,670 $63,840 FTB $25,020 $144,554 $110,158 $279,732 Studio Cascade $19,450 $13,400 $2,600 $35,450 Glatting Jackson $9,980 $24,970 $15,000 $49,950 TOTAL $69,450 $221,094 $138,428 $428,972 PAYMENT SCHEDULE The Consultant(ECO,as prime contractor)will prepare short monthly progress reports describing progress and percent completion by Phase and send it to the City's project manager by email.The City will review the progress reports and discuss any issues with ECO within 10 days,and make payments of the amount agreed up within 30 days,of the date of the email.Billings will be monthly,based on estimated percent of Phase completed.For example,if the Consultant estimates,and the City concurs as reasonable,that 70%of the work for Phase 1 is completed in May and June,then the invoice would be for 70%of$69,450.The Consultant may be no more than 90%of a Phase's budget before all products and meetings for that Phase(per this scope of work and the attached schedule of deliverables)have been delivered to the City.In some cases the Consultant may be working on two Phases at the same time:progress reports and progress payments will reflect that Scope of Work, Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 9 Optional Services The following services are not included in the Scope of Services,but are recommended additions should resources be available for them: PHASE II- OPTIONAL SERVICES Addition to Task 11 -Joint City Council/Planning Commission Study Session Participation of Glatting Jackson in the Joint City Council/Planning Commission Study Session,to assist FTB and ECO with the presentation of recommended transportation planning and street design recommendations. PHASE III—OPTIONAL SERVICES Task 4. City Review of Administrative Draft Subarea Plan FTB will forward a camera-ready document,electronic file and any additional copies ordered(at additional printing cost)to the City for review. Once City Staff has reviewed the document,FTB will attend a meeting in Spokane Valley to discuss the Subarea Plan draft with the City Staff Core Team. After receipt of a single marked-up copy of the plan containing the City's edits FTB will combine direction received at the review session with hard copy edits to produce the Public Review Draft. Task 5. Prepare Public Review Draft Subarea Plan document FTB will modify text,illustrations and cover design of the Subarea Plan as directed by City Staff. Pictures and captions will be incorporated into Books I and III. Electronic formatting and paste-up will be adjusted for printing ease. After coordinating with City Staff regarding last-minute issues.FTB will forward the draft to ECO for review and comment, make final edits and prepare the camera-ready document file to the City. Task 6. Planning Commission Hearing The ECO team will review and contribute to Plan Addendum received from City Staff. FTB will prepare and present materials for the Planning Commission Hearing. They will work with City Staff to coordinate logistics as well. Task 7. City Council Hearing The ECO team will review Plan Addendum received from City Staff and answer questions if needed. FTB will prepare and present materials for the City Council Hearing. They will work with City Staff to coordinate logistics as well. Task 8. Prepare Final Version of The Sprague/Appleway Corridor Subarea Plan. The ECO team will coordinate with City Staff regarding remaining issues needing closure and finalize the plan. FTB will prepare and transmit the Master File(an electronic file in PDF format)and copies to the City. Task 9. Compilation and Production of Editable Master File Copy(in addition to Master PDF files already included in the base Scope of Services) Scope of Work,Sprague/Appleway Corridor ECONorthwest,May 06 Page 10 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 06- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON, REPEALING AND AMENDING SECTIONS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE SECTIONS 10.05 ARTICLE II. CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ACTIVITY WITHIN RIGHT- OF-WAY, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING SECTIONS 10.05.080, 10.05.170,AND 10.05.210 WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley adopted Ordinance 03-63 regulating construction and work within the right-of way, now contained in Spokane Valley Municipal Code 10.05 Article II, and enforcement provisions in Ordinance 06-005 WHEREAS, in complying with the requirements of its enacted laws and regulations, the City finds from time to time that amending its laws is necessary to better protect the health, safety, welfare of the general public and the environment. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley ordains as follows: Article II. Construction Work and Activity Within Right-of-Way 10.05.070 Definitions. For the purposes of this article the following terms,phrases and words shall have the following meanings: "Applicant"means any person, firm or entity making written application to the director for an obstruction permit. "City"means the City of Spokane Valley. "Construction work"means the excavation or aboveground construction work permitted under this article. "Director"means the city manager or designee (anticipated to be the public works director). "Easement"means any City easement for access of public utilities. "Improvement"means any public or private improvement, including the property of public utilities. "Obstruction permit," also known as a right- of-way permit, means the authorization granted by the City to perform work or conduct activity in a specified right-of-way or easement. "Permittee"means any person who has been granted and has in full force and effect a permit issued hereunder. "Person"means any person, firm, corporation or service provider. "Public infrastructure"means any necessary construction, performed within the City right-of-way or on private property,to install City facilities, including streets, 1 sidewalks, storm drainage, street lights, sanitary sewers and/or water lines and necessary appurtenances, as identified within City standards. "Right-of-way" or"public way"means all property in which the City has any form of ownership or title and which is held for public street or utility purposes, regardless of whether or not any street or utility exists thereon or whether it is used, improved or maintained for public use. "Street"means any street,highway, sidewalk, alley, avenue or other public way, easement, or other public place in the City. (Ord. 63 § 1, 2003). 10.05.080 Obstruction permit required. An obstruction permit is required of any person who performs construction work or otherwise engages in activity within existing or proposed City rights-of-way, streets, easements, or on City owned infrastructure. Work done by or for the City within its rights-of-way will not require an obstruction permit, but will be held to the same standards of performance. In the case of an emergency, a private or public utility may commence work prior to obtaining a permit, provided the person obtains a construction permit within 48 hours after work is commenced or on the first City business day following said elapsed 48-hour period. (Ord. 63 § 2, 2003). Obstruction Permits issued between 1 April and 30 September are valid for 30 days after the date of issuance with a one time 30 day extension available. Obstruction Permits issued after 30 September but before 1 April shall be valid until 30 April. . 10.05.090 Obstruction permit—Application. No obstruction permit shall be issued unless a written application is submitted and approved by the director. The application shall, at a minimum, contain the following: A. Construction plans or drawings approved by the director, if required; B. The period of time during which the right-of- way will be obstructed; and C. Proof of the contractor's and all subcontractors' state licensing, insurance and requirements. Depending upon the nature and extent of the construction activity or work, the director may require engineering, restoration and drainage plans prepared by a Washington licensed engineer at applicant's sole cost and expense. (Ord. 63 § 3, 2003). 10.05.100 Obstruction permit fees. Obstruction permit fees shall be adopted by resolution of the city council. (Ord. 63 § 4, 2003). 2 10.05.110 Notice required. The applicant shall give to the director notice not less than 48 hours before any work or activity is commenced and shall notify the director upon completion of the same. In the event of an unexpected repair or emergency, work may be commenced as required under the circumstances. Unexpected repairs and emergency work shall comply with all other requirements of this article. (Ord. 63 § 5, 2003). 10.05.120 Construction standards. All work within the City right-of-way shall be in accordance with adopted City standards in effect at the time of the application for the permit. These include but are not limited to current versions of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction; the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD); Washington State Department of Transportation(WSDOT) Standard Specifications for Road, Bridge and Municipal Construction; and applicable standards of the American Public Works Association (APWA). (Ord. 63 § 6, 2003). 10.05.130 Maintaining access. In the event it is necessary for the permittee to excavate the entire width of the street, no more than half of the street shall be opened for construction and closed to traffic at one time. Such portion of the work shall be backfilled and completed before the remaining portion of the street may be excavated. If it is impossible, infeasible or unsafe to permit the work while maintaining an open lane for traffic, the director may, with the concurrence of the chief of police and fire chief, permit the street to be blocked for a short period of time where suitable detours can be provided and the public will not be unnecessarily inconvenienced. The permittee shall furnish facilities, such as bridges or other suitable means, or clearly identify appropriate detours, to allow the flow of traffic without unnecessary congestion. Appropriate signage and traffic control shall be furnished in accordance with the MUTCD. (Ord. 63 § 7, 2003). 10.05.140 Traffic control. Permittee is responsible for all traffic control and assumes the responsibility to maintain appropriate signage, signals and barricades that protect the public safety, in accordance with the MUTCD. Permittee shall provide for the safe operation of all equipment, vehicles and persons within the right-of-way. (Ord. 63 § 8, 2003). 10.05.150 Damage to existing improvements. All damage to existing public or private improvements during the progress of the construction work or activity shall be repaired by the permittee. Methods and 3 materials for such repair shall conform with adopted City standards. If the permittee fails to furnish the necessary labor and materials for such repairs,the director shall have the authority to cause said necessary labor and materials to be furnished by the City and the cost shall be charged against the permittee. Such charge shall be immediately paid by permittee and shall, if not paid on demand, be deemed a valid claim on the bond filed with the City. (Ord. 63 § 9, 2003). 10.05.160 City's right to restore right-of-way and easements. If the permittee fails to restore any City right-of-way or easement to its original and proper condition upon the expiration of the time fixed by such permit or shall otherwise fail to complete the right-of-way construction work covered by such permit or if the work of the permittee is defective and the defect is discovered within one year from the completion of the right-of-way construction work,the director or designee shall have the right to do all work and things necessary to restore the right-of-way and/or easement and to complete the right-of-way construction work. The permittee shall be liable for all costs and expenses of restoration or completion. The City shall have a cause of action for all fees, expenses and amounts paid for such work. Following demand,the City may enforce its rights pursuant to this article.No additional permits shall be granted until the invoice for City-performed work has been paid. (Ord. 63 § 10, 2003). 10.05.170 Bond. For the purpose of providing for the completion of the work or otherwise restoring the right-of-way to City standards, the applicant shall post a performance bond with the city clerk. The bond shall be: (1) issued by a surety licensed to do business in the state of Washington and (2) in an amount equal to 100 percent of the estimated cost of the work (or other reasonable measure of value) solely determined by the director. If the improvements have not been timely or satisfactorily completed,the director shall give notice of the same to permittee. The notice shall state: (1)the work to be done; (2)the time to complete the work which shall not exceed 30 days; and (3)that if the work is not commenced and completed within the time allotted,the City will cause the work to be completed and use the bond proceeds to pay for the same. All costs in excess of the bond proceeds may be recovered through appropriate legal action by the city attorney. A bond may be waived where proof of self-insurance is provided. The director is authorized to reduce the amount of the bond where good cause exists. (Ord. 63 § 11, 2003). The performance bond associated with the state of Washington Contractor's License granted by Washington Department of Labor and Industries shall suffice for pavement patch work for small projects up to and including 300 square feet. 4 10.05.180 Insurance—Evidence. The permittee, prior to the commencement of construction hereunder, shall furnish the director satisfactory evidence in writing that the permittee has in force during the performance of the construction work or activity, commercial general liability insurance of not less than$1,000,000 per occurrence and $1,000,000 general aggregate duly issued by an insurance company authorized to do business in this state. In addition,the policy shall name the City as an additional named insured. The director may reduce the insurance limits if good cause exists. (Ord. 63 § 12, 2003). 10.05.190 Indemnification and hold harmless. The permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from any and all claims, injuries, damages, losses or suits, including attorney fees, arising out of the permit issued under this article except as may be caused by the negligence or willful conduct on the part of the City. (Ord. 63 § 13, 2003). 10.05.200 Rules and policy. To implement the obstruction permit and provide for the public health and safety, the director, under the supervision of the city manager, may develop and adopt rules,policies and forms consistent with this article. All adopted rules,policies and forms shall be filed with the city clerk. (Ord. 63 § 14, 2003). 10.05.210 Violation—Penalties. In the event of a violation of SVMC 10.05.070—10.05.210, the director shall utilize the enforcement provisions contained in SVMC 10.30.150, et seq., as adopted or hereafter amended. Section 2. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence or clause of this chapter is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this chapter. Section 3. Effective date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed on this day of July, 2006. 5 Mayor,Diana Wilhite ATTEST: City Clerk, Christine Bainbridge Approved As To Form: Office of the City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: 6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORDINANCE NO. 04-005 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON,AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 35 CREATING A PLANNING COMMISSION AND ESTABLISHING THE DUTIES THEREOF. WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley is a non-charter code city authorized to create a Planning Commission which will serve in an advisory capacity to the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City will adopt a Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations to guide the reasonable and orderly development of the City; and WHEREAS, The City Council wishes to respond to the expressed concerns of citizens that immediately after incorporation the City begin a comprehensive planning process and review of development regulations; and WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley desires to encourage citizen input into the planning process by establishing a Planning Commission which will study, receive public input and recommend a Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations to the City Council for review and adoption. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, does hereby amend Ordinance No. 35 passed on February 25, 2003, to read as follows: Section 1. Establishment and Purpose. There is created the City of Spokane Valley Planning Commission. The purpose of the Planning Commission is to study and make recommendations to the Mayor and City Council for future planned growth through continued review of the City's comprehensive land use plan, development regulations, shoreline management, environmental protection, public facilities, capital improvements and other matters as directed by the City Council. Section 2. Membership. 1. Qualifications: The membership of the Planning Commission shall consist of individuals who have an interest in planning, land use, transportation, capital infrastructure and building and landscape design as evidenced by training, experience or interest in the City of Spokane Valley. 2. Appointment: Members of the Planning Commission shall be nominated by the Mayor and confirmed by a majority vote of at least four (4) members of the City Council. Planning Commissioners shall be selected without respect to political affiliations and shall serve without compensation. The Mayor, when considering appointments, shall Ordinance 04-005 Amending Ordinance 35 Page 1 of 4 attempt to select residents that represent various interests and locations within the City. 3. Number of Members/Terms: The Planning Commission shall consist of seven (7) members. All members shall reside within the City of Spokane Valley. The terms for the initial Commissioners shall be two (2) one (1) year terms, two (2) two (2) year terms and three (3) three (3) year terms. The initial members and their terms shall be decided by the Mayor and confirmed by the City Council. Subsequent terms shall be for a three (3) year period. Terms shall expire on the thirty-first day of December. 4. Removal: Members of the Commission may be removed by the Mayor, with the concurrence of the City Council, for neglect of duty, conflict of interest, malfeasance in office, or other just cause, or for unexcused absence from three (3) consecutive regular meetings. Failure to qualify as to residency shall constitute a forfeiture of office. The decision of the City Council regarding membership on the Planning Commission shall be final and without appeal. 5. Vacancies:. Vacancies occurring other than through the expiration of terms shall be filled for the unexpired term in the same manner as for appointments. 6. Conflicts of Interest: Members of the Planning Commission shall fully comply with RCW 42.23, Code of Ethics for Municipal Officers, RCW 42.36, Appearance of Fairness, and such other rules and regulations as may be adopted from time to time by the City Council regulating the conduct of any person holding appointive office within the City. No elected official or City employee may be a member of the Planning Commission. Section 3. Meetings -Rules. 1. The Planning Commission shall every year organize and elect from its members a Chair, who shall preside at all meetings of the Commission and perform such other functions as determined by rule. A Vice-Chair shall be elected to preside in the absence of the Chair. A majority of the Commission members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business, and a majority vote of those present shall be necessary to carry any proposition. 2. The Commission shall determine a regular meeting schedule (time, place and frequency) and shall meet, at least, one time every month. All meetings shall be open to the public. 3. The Commission shall adopt such rules and procedures as are necessary for the conduct of business and shall keep a taped record of its proceedings. Section 4. Staff Support. Administrative staff support to the Planning Commission shall be provided by the City Planning and Community Development Department. In addition, the Commission, through its Chair may request formal opinions or memorandums form the City Attorney or Planning and Community Development Director on any pending matter. Ordinance 04-005 Amending Ordinance 35 Page 2 of 4 Section 5. Duties and Responsibilities. The Planning Commission, as an advisory body to the City Council, shall perform and have the following duties and responsibilities: 1. Assist in the preparation of a Comprehensive Plan and Development Regulations in compliance with RCW 36.07A and 35A.63 including the establishment of procedures for early and continuous public participation in the development and amendment of the Comprehensive Plan and the Development Regulations; 2. Review plans and regulations related to land use management, shoreline management, environmental policy, transportation systems, public facilities and capital infrastructure planning and development; 3. Upon request from the City Manager or City Council, review potential annexations to the City; 4. Where design review is required by land use ordinances of the City, perform such design review unless that review is delegated to some other appointed body or City Staff; 5. Identify issues and recommend priorities for geographic sub-areas including park and open space areas in the City; 6. Meet and confer with the Hearing Examiner to review the administration of land use policies and ordinances to enhance the planning and permitting process; 7. Make periodic written and oral reports to the City Council addressing work in progress and other significant matters relating to the City; 8. Hold public hearings in the exercise of duties and responsibilities; 9. Perform such other duties and powers as may be conferred by ordinance, resolution or motion of the City Council Unless other wise assumed by the City Council, the Planning Commission shall hold all public hearings required to be held in the course of adoption or amendment to the Comprehensive Plan,the development regulations, adoption or amendment of the zoning map, or adoption or amendment of regulations for the subdivision of land, shoreline management, environmental regulations, and other land use ordinances of the City. Section 6. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance. Ordinance 04-005 Amending Ordinance 35 Page 3 of 4 Section 7. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect five (5) days after publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law. Passed by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley this 10th day of February, 2004. Michael DeVleming, Mayor ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved As To Form: Stanley M. Schwartz, City Attorney Date of Publication: Effective Date: Ordinance 04-005 Amending Ordinance 35 Page 4 of 4 RECEIVED J U P `- 8 2006 SO6kane SPOKANE VALLEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 4.00•0\7aileyPlanning Commission Public Comments Name 4v 1-T-2-- Address ZAddress Ll c ,4 l p RJ.,e co)-- Phone \- Phone Number ,c61' c�� Email address S7' t1 GC Agenda Item: v-01_-66 For the Proposal Against the Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak? Yes No RECEIVED yo." 0 6 2006 SPOKANE VALLEY PCOMMC1 OKane DEPARTMENT OF UNITY DEVELOPMENT .000Vale g Plannin Commission Public Comments Name �Q I J,.( LZ..-L-C Address i , c . `a 0( 6" 95 Phone Number 9 '74`- sl-Cc Email address 'Y•l r-a &. \JG L,.,A. p ,Cn . cs3N,„._ Agenda Item: �CW-T R L.cc-R , A Q-(v-•'r (Ng.A.U cmc.t a i' For the Proposal ,/, Against the Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak? Yes No RECEIVED 8 2006 SPOKANE VALLEY Spokane DEPARTMENTDEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPDAENT 4001.11;ValleYPIanning Commission Public Comments Name , ,XZ) 4 � of Address 1 f a a 4. (, k C/k,c, Phone Number 7 2 - 711-3z Email address K a Agenda Item: \ , , T/ Yh. u I For the Proposal Against the Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak? X Yes No ,spoka<• Department of Community Development Mil k, . Planning Division Sprague/Appleway Corridor Subarea PIa PIannorx Commjsskon June 0, 200 Department of Community Development j�alley _ Planning Division aktosiel Project History • Sprague/Appleway — Council Priority — Maintain Couplet — Revert to 2 way streets — Economic Impacts • Economic Analysis — ECONorthwest and Michael Freedman —Transportation should support land use —Strip Commercial no longer viable 1 Department of Community Development Spokane Ville Planning Division Project History • Comprehensive Plan Adopted —Corridor Revitalization/Redevelopment —Corridor transforms to pattern of centers and segments —City Center Priority • Detailed planning work needed to transform corridor Department of Community Development Spokane _:_ \allc} Planning Division Project History • Council Budgets $250K for subarea plan • RFP issued December 2005 • 4 proposals ranging from $200K to $400K • Interview Panel consensus to recommend ECONorthwest Team ($400K) — ECONorthwest — Freedman, Tung and Bottomley — Studio Cascade — Glatting Jackson 2 ne Department of Community Development j�alkv Planning Division % r..a- Appleway Extension Project — Federal $$ on hold until project listed on Metropolitan Transportation Plan — Purpose and Need — Environmental Assessment Required • Requires Evaluation of Alternatives Department of Community Development } Spii6anc Planning Division Final Project Scope • Subarea Plan Project Re-Scoped —Transportation, Land Use, Economics —Council Approves Contract: $430K 3 sp � Department of Community Development jValle Plannin;Division Subarea Plan Process PHASE I PROJECT STARTUP EXISTING CONDITIONS INVENTORY&ANALYSIS Clarify Community BEGIN DEVELOP Aspirations&Define Opportunities for City Council ' Beneficial Change Announcement of Field Reconnaissance Opportunities& &Mapping Constraints Assessment Project Start Up (City Staff Only) j (May — July 2006) Department of Community Development Spiikane ' jVallev Planning Division Subarea Plan Process P HAS E I I "BROAD BRUSH"CENTERS&SEGMENTS Envisioning the FEEDBACK DEVELOP FEEDBACK REFINE Future Corridor: AM Core Plan Concept Focus Groups: Full Day Core Centers& Team Meeting Preferred 11110.Development Auto Dealerships/ Team Working Segments Corridor Local Businesses Session ; Alternatives PM Community Framework — Workshop#1 CENTERS STREET DESIGN DEVELOP FEEDBACK DEVELOP FEEDBACK AM Core AM Core i , Conceptual Team Meeting Team Meeting Alternatives for' PC/CouncilStreetDesfun , PC'Council td community Centers \/Study Session Il Alternatives Study Session \ Community Workshop#2 ' Wort,shcp#7 (July — December 2006) 4 �. Department of Community Development 6. jVaIIey moil Planning Division Subarea Plan Process PHASE III ADMINISTRATIVE DRAFT Implementing DEVELOP TRAINING Comnuutity Intent: The Subarea Plan Regulatory Plan Orientation Administrative ► Session Coding System Policies.Charts& Plan Document Diagrams Core Team+Add. Planning Staff (December — May 2007) Department of Community Development Sp"ohanc Planning Division Important Dates July 19: Focus Groups September 14: Community Workshop #1 October 11 : Community Workshop #2 October 12: Joint CC/PC Study Session November 30: Community Workshop #3 January 16: Joint CC&PC Session 5 City Center Today . , " , •_; irGtovair__' ,. .0...... City Center Tomorrow? • _ w V. Y?47 -'r�er.ct __In-• jai__..� -- r k•ms - ` r l�-�_� . •A.`. ii r.yq fir{ y rYall ~*• 1111 f ;- t t •ri tf• --• 1 fit 1 `ist --„- . • 1` ' ` 1 4,n, 4 Pi .. ., r • t i 6 Department of Community Development i Spokane J ! Spokane Planning Division , i 7