Loading...
Agenda 08/25/2005 c��of z , AGENDA Spokane SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION galley REGULAR MEETING August 25, 2005 CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES August 11, 2005 minutes PUBLIC COMMENT — for members of the Public to speak to the Commission regarding matters NOT on the current agenda. COMMISSION REPORTS ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT COMMISSION BUSINESS New Business — Ponderosa and Rotchford Acres — Extension of Interim Zoning Old Business — Comprehensive Plan deliberations — Beginning with the Land Use Map FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER- ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF Fred Beaulac Marina Sukup, AICP Robert Blum Greg McCormick, AICP John G. Carroll, Vice-Chair Scott Kuhta, AICP David Crosby, Chair Mike Basinger, Assoc. William Gothmann Deanna Griffith Gail Kogle Ian Robertson www.spokanevalley.orq SCTTY of "-x pokane Planning Commission .00Valley Comprehensive Plan p Public Comments Please print clearly, turn in to the meeting recorder Name: Address: Zip Code: Phone Number: Email Address: My Comments address the chapter regarding: Transport Capital Introduction Land Use ation Facilities Economic Natural Housing Development Utilities Environment Parks Wish to Speak? Yes No Planning Commission deliberation meeting notes from Wednesday, August 24, 2005. 6:00 to 9:00 pm. Land Use Chapter notes, continued. Present - Commissioners Crosby, Carroll, Kogle, Beaulac, Gothmann and Blum. Commissioner Robertson absent, excused. Commissioner Beaulac said he had contacted Rob Cragg with the Industrial Park to clarify some points on his public testimony. Mr. Cragg took the Industrial sections from the Land Use Chapter of the comp plan and added/subtracted his comments to it. Commissioner Beaulac said he thought it should be given some consideration. LUG-13, no change LUP-62, no change LUP-63, no change LUP-64, combine with policy 62 LUP-65, good policy but not in this section, move to capital facilities LUG-14, built environment is man made. No change LUP-66, 67, 68, staff to consolidate LUP-69, define aesthetic corridors- considerable discussion as to what it is and which we name and what impact it could have. 1. State Route 27 (Pines Rd.) - from Trent Ave. (SR-290) to the south city limits line. 2. Appleway Blvd.- south side, Park Rd. to Dishman-Mica Rd. 3. Evergreen Rd. - Sprague Ave. to Indiana Ave. 4. Mirabeau Parkway 5. Dishman-Mica Rd. - 8th Ave to the south city limits line 6. Indiana Ave. - Flora to Pines Rd. (SR-27) Add a policy that will allow for annual review of aesthetic corridors. LUP-70, no change to policy or bullet points LUP-71, no change LUP-72, remove video boards LUG-15, no change LUP-73, change to read with continually LUP-74, Strike 'develop methods to' LUP-75, remove `government-to-government' Paragraph 2.9.1 Commissioner Gothmann has an issue with the reluctance to have cul-de-sacs as an integral part of development. Discussion followed on both side of the issue. Add something about emergency evacuation. Add a policy addresses requirement of developers "regardless of whatever development plan is chosen, special consideration must be given to emergency access routes" LUG-16, no change LUP-76, no change LUP-77, no change Mr. Kuhta handed out a revision that the staff feels is important to address. Removed references to actual zone specifications and requirements. Does not belong in the plan, too limiting. Belongs in the regulations instead. Commission has the Land Use Map, Capital Facilities and Parks left yet to finish. Good of the order. Commissioner Carroll requests that after we finish the land use map can we go back to the beginning of the chapter and discuss again the single family — multi-family goals and policies. Motion to adjourn at 8:50 pm. City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft 2.5.6 Industrial Designations ,Industrial land and facilities are,important for the economic health of Spokane Valley. Deleted:Providing for The broad range of,industrial businesses from high-tech to basic industry help drive the [Deleted:i local economy and create an economic multiplier effect throughout the region. r Dem:is Recognizing that there exists an,abundant supply of usable land and existing facilities (Deleted:I these assets must be coupled with a pro-business attitude which will create opportunities Deleted:Providing an adequate for recruitment and expansion of industry. ,Minimal environmental constraints and access Deleted:within to infrastructure will ,help, Spokane Valley ,to be an attractive place for industrial businesses to locate and prosper. (See Chapter 7, Economic Development,for additional Deleted:in place policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial business.) Deleted:e Deleted:ensure that Industrial—Heavy Industry (Deleted:will Heavy industry is characterized by,industrial activities which include, but are not limited (Deleted:intense to, manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly/disassembly, freight-handling, warehousing,distribution and similar operations. Although unlikely,heavy industry may Deleted:H have significant noise,odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding areas. ,Residential and,some recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for (Deleted:Commercial,residential, 1 heavy industry unless compatibility can be demonstrated, It is generally recognized that (Deleted:most some commercial and retail uses are highly compatible within an,industrial area. Heavy (Deleted:, industry, by virtue of the property use, dictates construction of large facilities. Deleted:except for smaller-scale Redevelopment of those large facilities for commercial use such as a furniture store that ancillary uses serving the requires substantial floor space at an affordable rent or an office building for executives (Deleted:s 1 and ancillary support of the industrial user such as attorneys and accountants may be the Deleted:Limiting incompatible uses highest and best use for redevelopment of existing industrial buildings as our national ensures a competitive advantage in ing economy shifts away from industrial/manufacturing. Alternate uses of industrial land and adequate indurecrstmllandsent by pply,re adequate industrial land supply,reducing facilities should be driven by economic considerations which allow the owner flexibility land use conflicts and preventing inflation and income to maintain his/her property in a first—class condition. The conversion of of land prices. Moreover,allowing designated vacant industrial land to other uses should be limited. However,,lot allowing (:elated:wide a,reasonable variety of commerciaLretail and other uses in the,industrial areas would be (Deli:; ) in conflict with section 2.5.5 of,this Plan related to he potential benefits of mixed use (Deleted:Industrial development. (Deleted:other portions of Deleted:concentrating major commercial growth in nodes at the intersection of major streets. Industrial—Light Industry (Deleted:L (Deleted:I The,light,industry designation is often found in a planned industrial area where special Deleted:with emphasis and attention may be given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and (Deleted:I community compatibility. Uses may include high technology and other low-impact (Deleted: industries. Light _ndustry areas may incorporate office, retail and other commercial uses Deleted:Non-industrial uses should be as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. , limited and in the majority of cases be associated with permitted industrial uses.' City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft I The bight,industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial Deleted:L areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a Deleted:I visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. Industrial Goals&Policies Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses. THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, THE CITY OF SPOKANE AND THE ADJACENT COUNTY LAND HAVE VAST AMOUNTS OF INDUSTRIAL AREAS. AS OUR NATIONAL ECONOMY SHIFTS TO A SERVICE ORIENTED ECONOMY IMPOSITION OF NEW LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND WILL BENEFIT NO ONE! Policies LUP-54 Program capital facility expenditures to facilitate the development of lands designated for industrial uses. I HOPE THERE ARE NO FUNDS BEING EXPENDED FOR THIS TODAY AS THERE IS NO ECONOMIC RATIONAL FOR THIS AT THIS TIME LUP-55 Encourage low-polluting industries to relocate in Spokane Valley. SINCE WHEN HASN'T ANY COMMUNITY IN THE UNITED STATES NOT DONE THIS? IT TAKES MUCH MORE THAN "ENCOURAGEMENT" TO LAND A NEW COMPANY IN SPOKANE VALLEY. Please see my comments made at the public input forum. LUP-56 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. SOUNDS NICE BUT OF NO VALUE! 1 CAN TESTIFY AS A MEMBER OF THE EDC AND BUSINESS RECRUITER FOR MY COMPANY TO THE FACT THAT THIS WILL NOT ATTRACT NEW INDUSTRY. THIS WILL ONLY INCREASE THE NEW CITY'S EXPENSES AND NOT BOLSTER THE ECONOMY. Goal LUG-11 A variety of strategically located heavy industrial areas,should (Deleted:should be be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? HEAVY INDUSTRIAL IS HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. HOW WILL WE GET A"VARIETY?" City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft Policies LUP-57 Residential and some recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry unless compatibility can be demonstrated. It is generally recognized that some commercial and retail uses are highly compatible with an industrial area. Heavy industrial by virtue of the property use dictates construction of large facilities. Redevelopment of those large facilities for commercial use such as a furniture store that requires substantial floor space at an affordable rent or an office building for executives including ancillary support of the industrial user such as attorneys and accountants may be the highest and best use for redevelopment of existing industrial buildings as our national economy shifts away from industrial/manufacturing. Alternate uses of industrial land and facilities should be driven by economic considerations which allow the owner flexibility and income to maintain his/her property in a first—class condition. The conversion of designated vacant industrial lands to other uses should be limited. However, not allowing a reasonable variety of commercial,retail and other uses in the industrial areas would be in conflict with section 2.5.5 of this Plan related to the potential benefits of mixed use development Deleted:Commercial,residential and LUP-58 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in areas designated for industry, strictly limited in order to ensure adequate land supply and prevent inflation of except for small-scale ancillary tional uses land prices. 1 assure you that the laws of supply and demand will dictate the commercialdri arilysevethein intended to primarily serve the industrial inflation rate of land prices not this "land plan." This language has no place in a areal professional and formal document. LUP-59 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas. Goal LUG-12 A variety of strategically located light industry areas should be designated and protected. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? HOW WILL WE GET A"VARIETY?" PROTECTED FROM WHOM OR WHAT? City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft Policies LUP-60 J esidential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in [Deleted:Commercial,r areas designated for light industry Jo the extent that they are not compatible with Deleted:except for small-scale the light industrial uses. ancillary commercialand recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area. LUP-61 A planned Jight industry area,may include sidewalks, bike lanes (Deleted:L and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive working environment. (Deleted:a (Remember this is the same planner that was concerned about price inflation (- :shall under LUP 58 and they want to add all of this expense to the infrastructure! City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft 2.5.6 Industrial Designations Industrial land and facilities are important for the economic health of Spokane Valley. The broad range of industrial businesses from high-tech to basic industry help drive the local economy and create an economic multiplier effect throughout the region. Recognizing that there exists an abundant supply of usable land and existing facilities these assets must be coupled with a pro-business attitude which will create opportunities for recruitment and expansion of industry. Minimal environmental constraints and access to infrastructure will help Spokane Valley to be an attractive place for industrial businesses to locate and prosper. (See Chapter 7, Economic Development, for additional policies that encourage recruitment and retention of industrial business.) Industrial—Heavy Industry Heavy industry is characterized by industrial activities which include, but are not limited to, manufacturing, processing, fabrication, assembly/disassembly, freight-handling, warehousing, distribution and similar operations. Although unlikely, heavy industry may have significant noise, odor or aesthetic impacts to surrounding areas. Residential and some recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry unless compatibility can be demonstrated. It is generally recognized that some commercial and retail uses are highly compatible within an industrial area. Heavy industry, by virtue of the property use, dictates construction of large facilities. Redevelopment of those large facilities for commercial use such as a furniture store that requires substantial floor space at an affordable rent or an office building for executives and ancillary support of the industrial user such as attorneys and accountants may be the highest and best use for redevelopment of existing industrial buildings as our national economy shifts away from industrial/manufacturing. Alternate uses of industrial land and facilities should be driven by economic considerations which allow the owner flexibility and income to maintain his/her property in a first—class condition. The conversion of designated vacant industrial land to other uses should be limited. However, not allowing a reasonable variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the industrial areas would be in conflict with section 2.5.5 of this Plan related to the potential benefits of mixed use development. Industrial—Light Industry The light industry designation is often found in a planned industrial area where special emphasis and attention may be given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility. Uses may include high technology and other low-impact industries. Light industry areas may incorporate office, retail and other commercial uses as ancillary uses within an overall plan for the industrial area. City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft The light industry category may serve as a transitional category between heavy industrial areas and other less intensive land use categories. The category may also serve as a visual buffer for heavy industrial areas adjacent to aesthetic corridors. Industrial Goals & Policies Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses. THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, THE CITY OF SPOKANE AND THE ADJACENT COUNTY LAND HAVE VAST AMOUNTS OF INDUSTRIAL AREAS. AS OUR NATIONAL ECONOMY SHIFTS TO A SERVICE ORIENTED ECONOMY IMPOSITION OF NEW LAND USE REGULATIONS FOR INDUSTRIAL LAND WILL BENEFIT NO ONE! Policies LUP-54 Program capital facility expenditures to facilitate the development of lands designated for industrial uses. I HOPE THERE ARE NO FUNDS BEING EXPENDED FOR THIS TODAY AS THERE IS NO ECONOMIC RATIONAL FOR THIS AT THIS TIME LUP-55 Encourage low-polluting industries to relocate in Spokane Valley. SINCE WHEN HASN'T ANY COMMUNITY IN THE UNITED STATES NOT DONE THIS? IT TAKES MUCH MORE THAN "ENCOURAGEMENT" TO LAND A NEW COMPANY IN SPOKANE VALLEY. Please see my comments made at the public input forum. LUP-56 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. SOUNDS NICE BUT OF NO VALUE! I CAN TESTIFY AS A MEMBER OF THE EDC AND BUSINESS RECRUITER FOR MY COMPANY TO THE FACT THAT THIS WILL NOT ATTRACT NEW INDUSTRY. THIS WILL ONLY INCREASE THE NEW CITY'S EXPENSES AND NOT BOLSTER THE ECONOMY. Goal LUG-11 A variety of strategically located heavy industrial areas should be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? HEAVY INDUSTRIAL IS HEAVY INDUSTRIAL. HOW WILL WE GET A"VARIETY?" City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft Policies LUP-57 Residential and some recreational uses should not be allowed in areas designated for heavy industry unless compatibility can be demonstrated. It is generally recognized that some commercial and retail uses are highly compatible with an industrial area. Heavy industrial by virtue of the property use dictates construction of large facilities. Redevelopment of those large facilities for commercial use such as a furniture store that requires substantial floor space at an affordable rent or an office building for executives including ancillary support of the industrial user such as attorneys and accountants may be the highest and best use for redevelopment of existing industrial buildings as our national economy shifts away from industrial/manufacturing. Alternate uses of industrial land and facilities should be driven by economic considerations which allow the owner flexibility and income to maintain his/her property in a first—class condition. The conversion of designated vacant industrial lands to other uses should be limited. However, not allowing a reasonable variety of commercial, retail and other uses in the industrial areas would be in conflict with section 2.5.5 of this Plan related to the potential benefits of mixed use development LUP-58 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited in order to ensure adequate land supply and prevent inflation of land prices. I assure you that the laws of supply and demand will dictate the inflation rate of land prices not this "land plan." This language has no place in a professional and formal document. LUP-59 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas. Goal LUG-12 A variety of strategically located light industry areas should be designated and protected. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN? HOW WILL WE GET A "VARIETY?" PROTECTED FROM WHOM OR WHAT? City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft Policies LUP-60 Residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry to the extent that they are not compatible with the light industrial uses. LUP-61 A planned light industry area may include sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive working environment. (Remember this is the same planner that was concerned about price inflation under LUP 58 and they want to add all of this expense to the infrastructure! Deleted:<sp>City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft Low Density Residential The Low Density Residential (LDR) Comprehensive Plan designation addresses a range of single family residential densities from 1 dwelling unit per acre up to and including,e dwelling Fr r,_`, ;Deleted:approximately units per acre. This designation would y ;. 1'1-:= -4, be implemented through a series of ,. - _ zoning designations as described •,zrr- viii '` - `. below. ick Implementing zoning for the LDR ; ' ,.': 3 designation ,will include ,,a series of �"'-x �,. '' (Deleted:would _ zones allowing a range of minimum lot Deleted:Residential-1(R-1),which sizes. Existing lot sizes and community retains larger urban lots;first,to character will be strongly considered when developing the City's zoning map. For Preserve single family neighborhoods that were specifically platted into 1+/- example, areas such as Rotchford Acres and Ponderosa will likely require minimum lot acre lots in the past;and second,to sizes close to an acre in size. These large lot developments currently allow for horses avoid development pressure on or a animals and have a distinct character that should be preserved to the near environmentally sensitive areas and other large and to retain areas that have unique greatest extent possible. , area-wide circumstances.There are two notable locations of areas that were platted into approximately 1 acre lots:Ponderosa,located in the The majority of the LDR designation Twit,provide for densities ranging from four to six southwest portion of the City;and dwelling units per acre. Typical lot sizes will range from 7,000 to 10,000 square feet. ` Rotchfor oAcres located in the easternportion of the Cdy. ,Some areas designated as LDR still lack necessary urban services and infrastructure, r mainly sanitary sewer facilities. Upon Deleted:It J 4 provision of urban services, such as Deleted:Additional zoning districts water and sewer, and transit services, that would be used to implement the an increase in density in some areas { __/;. LDR designation may be warranted. However, the City I` [Deleled:ould will adopt strict criteria to evaluate zone " "' ,,,J.:-.• '.T Deleted:The Residential-2(R-2) changes to ensure that future .;.z.11.._; "' -f r t_ii' „Ai ��i - designation would require lot sizes of development is compatible with the l'.. 'at n__ 4b� " a »�• ', =' 10,000 square feet. The Residential- surrounding neighborhood. — - 3(R-3)<sp>designation will require ~� 7,000 square feet minimum lot sizes and provide for a transition in density Medium Density Residential between land designated as single family residential and higher density - residential designations or non- The Medium Density Residential 5 ,. residential areas such as office. designation represents an opportunity r&\i `r . #,P-: .f... ,,_ to provide a range of housing types to ' r '"-,,..7r,-.!:': accommodate anticipated residential growth. The increase in population,decline in average family size,and increased cost of single-family homes have created increased demand for new housing types. The Land Use chapter encourages the development of housing types, such as duplexes, townhouses, and condominiums in existing multi-family areas and within mixed-use development in commercial areas. Deleted:designation of Residential- 4(R-4) Multi-familyuses, in largepart, are in areas currentlyzoned for multiple-family Deleted:with a corresponding 9 P Y density of development. Zoninguvill allow densities up to,12 dwelling units per acre in the Medium Deleted:will be used to implement the Me CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 15 CHAPTER 2—LAND USE Deleted:<sp>City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft Density Residential designation. Opportunities for new development will occur through redevelopment and build-out of remaining parcels. Multi-family residential zones should be used as transitional zoning between higher intensity land uses such as commercial and office to lower density single family neighborhoods. Additionally, Medium Density Residential,areas should be located near (Deleted:R-4 designated services and high capacity transit facilities or transit routes. Residential design guidelines that address design and appearance of multiple-family developments should be considered.The primary goal of residential design guidelines is to develop multiple-family housing that is reflective of the community's character and appearance. High Density Residential This designation provides for existing multi-family residential development developed at a density in excess of 12 units per acre. Additionally, High Density Residential (HDR) designated areas are also located in areas near higher intensity development, such as City Center. HDR provides housing opportunities for younger, lower income households in the City who may not yet be able to afford a home of their own. Moreover, this designation provides housing options for people looking to "downsize" from a single family dwelling on an individual lot or for those known as"empty-nesters"whose children have moved out of the household and a large single family home is no longer needed. Generally,this designation is appropriate for land which is located adjacent to the arterial street system served by public transit and is in close proximity to business and commercial centers. Residential Goals&Policies SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect the character of Spokane Valley's residential' 'Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.75", neighborhoods, Hanging: 0.75" Deleted: while providing a wide Policies range of housing densities and types in the residentially designated areas. LUP-1.1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single-family neighborhoods through the development and enforcement,of the City's (Deleted: strict enforcement land use regulations. LUP-1.2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses and/or higher intensity uses. LUP-1.3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new single-family developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 16 CHAPTER 2-LAND USE Deleted:<sp>City of Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan Public Hearing Draft LUP-1.4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve single family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. LUP 1.5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential area$, Open space dedication shall be Deleted: to preserve the natural 1 proportionate to the size of the development. setting of Spokane Valley LUP-i.6 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. LUP-i.7 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development(trees, watercourses, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. ▪ (Formatted:Indent:Left: 0" LUP-1.8 Allow zone changes within the Low Density Residential category only. {Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.75+', when specific criteria are met. Criteria may include: Hanging: 0.75" Formatted:Indent:Left: 1.5" • Substantial changes within zone change area. Formatted:Bulleted+Level:1+ • Clear mapping errors. Aligned at: 1.5"+Tab after: 1.75" ▪ Adequate facilities and services(e.g. sewer,water capacity). +Indent at: 1.75" • Consistency with average surrounding densities. (Formatted:Bullets and Numbering1 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Goal LUG-2 Provide a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate- Formatted:Indent:Left: 0.75", with the community's needs and preferences. Hanging: 0.75" Policies LUP-2_1 Allow and encourage a variety of multi-family housing types in designated Deleted:s ,mixed use areas, especially in the City Center area. I Deleted:commercial LUP,2.2 Use design and performance standards for multi-family developments to (Deleted:9 achieve integration in commercial and mixed use developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. LUP-2.3 „Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve (Deleted:10.Multi-family single family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to • development should be supported with appropriate transportation and walking, biking and transit uses. capital facilities improvements LUP-2 , Multi-family residential development should be designed to provide (Dmaeted:11 privacy and common open space. Open space areas shall be CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17 CHAPTER 2-LAND USE Confidential Page 1 7/21/2005 Chapter 2 - Land Use Residential Goals & Policies SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Goal LUG-1 Preserve and protect Spokane Valley's residential neighborhoods while providing a wide range of housing densities and types in the residentially designated areas. Policies LUP-1 Maintain and protect the character of existing and future single- family neighborhoods through strict enforcement of the City's land use regulations. Implementation Strategies: • Clear and enforceable regulations • Overlay or specific zoning provisions developed through neighborhood or sub-area plans • Limitations on re-subdivision LUP-2 Protect residential areas from impacts of adjacent non-residential uses. Implementation Strategies: • Additional setbacks r 1 • Screening & landscaping LUP-3 Review and revise as necessary, existing land use regulations to provide for innovation and flexibility in the design of new single-family developments, accessory dwelling units and in-fill development. Implementation Strategies: • Improved definitions/regulations for cluster housing, townhouses, patio homes • Revision of accessory dwelling provisions LUP-4 Encourage the development of transportation routes and facilities to serve single family neighborhoods. Special attention should be given to pedestrian circulation. • Sidewalk and bikeway construction to receive priority for funding • Transit amenities including shelters along routes servicing single family neighborhoods Confidential Page 2 7/21/2005 LUP-5 Encourage the development of parks and the dedication of open space in and adjacent to residential areas to preserve the natural setting of Spokane Valley. Implementation Strategies: • Require dedication of land or money in-lieu of land for all new short plats and subdivisions. • Transfer Development rights allowing higher density in exchange for dedication/preservation of open space. LUP-6 Consider special development techniques (e.g., zero lot lines, lot size averaging, and planned unit developments) in single-family areas, provided they result in residential development consistent with the quality and character of existing neighborhoods. Implementation Strategies: • Currently allowed. Improved criteria and regulations as a result of neighborhood and subarea plans. LUP-7 Preserve site characteristics that enhance residential development (trees, watercourses, vistas, and similar features) using site planning techniques such as clustering, planned unit developments, transfer of development rights and lot size averaging. THIS PROVISION IS IMPLICIT IN LU5 AND LU-6. MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Goal LUG-2 Provide a wide range of housing types and densities commensurate with the community's needs and preferences. Policies LUP-8 Allow and encourage a variety of multiple-family housing types in designated commercial areas, especially in the City Center area. Implementation Strategies: • Should discourage low density development LUP-9 Use design and performance standards for multiple-family developments to achieve integration in commercial and mixed use developments. Performance standards should focus on scale, appearance, and compatibility. Implementation Strategies: • Types of standards should be specified. LUP-10 Multiple-family development should be supported with appropriate transportation and capital facilities improvements. THIS REPEATS LU4— MORE SPECIFICITY REQUIRED. Confidential Page 3 7/21/2005 LUP-11 Multiple-family residential development should be designed to provide privacy and common open space. Variations in facades and rooflines should be used to add character and interest to multiple-family developments. Implementation Strategies: • Form based codes • Open space dedication/preservation per residential unit. LUP-12 Encourage the establishment of street patterns and amenities that encourage walking, bicycling, and transit use. THIS REPEATS LUP4 AND 10. SHOULD BE MORE SPECIFIC Commercial Goals & Policies COMMERCIAL Goal LUG-3 Transform Community Business areas into vital, attractive, mixed-use areas that appeal to pedestrians and motorists and enhance the community's image. Policies LUP-13 Encourage transformation of Sprague Avenue Regional/ Community Commercial corridor into a quality mixed-use retail area. Retail development along the corridor, exclusive of the City Center, should be concentrated at major intersections and designed to integrate auto, pedestrian, and transit circulation. Integration of public amenities and open space into retail and office development should also be encouraged. Implementation Strategies: • Rezone properties between nodes for alternate uses. • Prohibit expansion of used car sales in retail areas outside designated AutoRow or other designated nodes. • Priorities for pedestrian, bicycle and transit improvement funding • Open space dedication/preservation as development requirement. • Requirements for street tree planting and landscaping • Strengthen requirements for the maintenance of landscaping. LUP-14 Encourage auto-oriented large bulk retailers to locate in the designated Regional Commercial nodes around major intersections. Implementation Strategies: • Focus public improvements to support AutoRow area and other designated nodes. Confidential Page 4 7/21/2005 • Prohibit expansion of used car sales in retail areas outside designated AutoRow or other designated nodes. • • Goal LUG-4 Provide neighborhood and community scale retail centers for the City's neighborhoods. Policies LUP-15 Integrate retail developments into surrounding neighborhoods with attention to quality design and function. Implementation Strategies: • Landscaping and dumpster requirements • Specify what this means— how to ensure good design? LUP-16 Encourage pedestrian and bicycle access to neighborhood shopping and services. Implementation Strategies: • Sidewalks and bike paths priority for funding LUP-17 Encourage neighborhood retail and personal services to locate at appropriate locations where local economic demand and design solutions demonstrate compatibility with the neighborhood. PLAN ALREADY DOES THIS—OTHER ENCOURAGEMENT? LUP-18 Retail and personal services should be encouraged to group together within planned centers to allow for ease of pedestrian movement. Implementation Strategies: • How defined? Duplicates LUP-16 LUP-19 Neighborhood Commercial centers should consist of neighborhood scale retail and personal services. Implementation Strategies: • How defined? Implicit in LUP-17 LUP-20 Encourage mixed use residential and commercial and office development in Neighborhood Commercial designations where compatibility with nearby uses can be demonstrated. Implementation Strategies: • How demonstrate compatibility? Land use plan does this? How different than LUP 15? LUP-21 Neighborhood Business areas should be served by transit consistent with the Transportation Element. THIS DOES NOT SAY ANYTHING—more specificity needed. Confidential Page 5 7/21/2005 LUP-22 Provide for a mixed use commercial, office and residential uses in commercial areas. Duplicates LUP 15 and LUP 20 LUP-23 Use Community Design Guidelines to promote common open space, public art, and plazas in commercial and office developments. LUP-24 Ensure compatibility between mixed-use developments and residential areas by regulating height, scale, setbacks, and buffers. LUP-25 Develop Community Design Guidelines that encourage quality design and pedestrian and vehicle circulation in commercial, office and mixed use developments. • This is an implementation strategy rather than a policy LUP-26 Use Community Design Guidelines to encourage commercial development to locate along the street edge (where deemed appropriate) to provide pedestrian street access. Provide pedestrian access between developments and to transit stations. LUP 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26 ALL SAY THE SAME THING, DUPLICATING LUP 15 AND 20. • The Community Design Guidelines LUP-27 Identify and designate streets where on-street parking can be safely provided without unduly slowing traffic flow or jeopardizing traffic safety. Implementation Strategies: • Arterials and collectors should not have on-street parking, since purpose is mobility not access by definition. LUP-28 Provide incentives to encourage developers to include housing in commercial, office and mixed-use projects. Implementation Strategies: • Specifically? Goal LUG-5 Identify appropriate locations for the Auto Mall Overlay designation. Policies LUP-29 Identify other appropriate automobile related uses within the Auto Mall Overlay designation that are complementary to new automobile dealerships. Confidential Page 6 7/21/2005 LUP-30 Implement appropriate development standards for permitted uses within the Auto Mall Overlay designated area. LUP-31 Develop appropriate signage standards for uses permitted within the Auto Mall Overlay designated area. CITY CENTER Goal LUG-6 Create an identifiable City Center that serves as the social, cultural, and economic focus of the City of Spokane Valley. Policies LUP-32 Define a City Center with distinct boundaries, unique building types, and special features. Implementation Strategies: • Community Design Guidelines? • Form-based zoning • Open space set asides/incentives • Tailor residential open space dedication/preservation to urban scale. • Eliminate height restrictions • Create a destination landmark through facilities and public art LUP-33 Strengthen existing connections of the City Center area to the region's high capacity transit system. Implementation Strategies: • LUP-34 Encourage a mix of compatible uses to create a lively, attractive, and safe place to live, work, and visit. Implementation Strategies: LUP-35 Focus on improving the existing character and image of the City Center area through appropriate development regulations and design standards. Implementation Strategies: LUP-36 Develop land use regulations that allow higher intensity development in the City Center including taller buildings, increased floor area ratios (FAR), permitted uses, etc.. Implementation Strategies: LUP-37 Coordinate with urban service providers to ensure sufficient capacity is available for anticipated development. Confidential Page 7 7/21/2005 Implementation Strategies: • Affected service providers? Specifics? LUP-38 Allow for a variety of uses and mixed-use development within buildings or complexes. Ensure that mixed-use development complements and enhances the character of the surrounding residential and commercial area. Implementation Strategies: DUPLICATES LUP 34 LUP-39 Promote the siting of cultural and civic uses within the City Center core. The City should always consider City Center Core sites in siting analyses and decisions regarding potential civic and cultural uses the City develops. In addition, incentives should be explored that could attract cultural and civic uses to the City Center over which the City does not have direct control. Implementation Strategies: IMPLICIT IN LUP 38 LUP-40 Develop land use regulations that encourage the City Center Frame area to accommodate higher density residential uses accompanied by residentially oriented retail and service uses. IMPLICIT IN LUP 38 LUP-41 Provide amenities such as community services, parks and public spaces to meet the residential needs in the Frame area. Implementation Strategies: • Specify services LUP-42 Provide an effective transition between the Frame area and nearby lower density residential development. Implementation Strategies: • SPECIFY Goal LUG-7 Provide a balanced transportation network that accommodates public transportation, high occupancy vehicles, pedestrians, bicyclists, automobiles and integrated parking. Policies LUP-43 Improve traffic circulation around and through the City Center by extending the street network and creating smaller blocks. Implementation Strategies: LUP-44 Emphasize pedestrian and bicycle circulation, as well as other travel modes in all aspects of developing the City Center transportation system. Include public sidewalks, street trees, street furniture and other pedestrian amenities for streets. Confidential Page 8 7/21/2005 Implementation Strategies: • Priority for funding LUP-45 Develop clear and safe pedestrian paths through large parcels to enhance the pedestrian network. IMPLICIT IN LUP 44-WHY LARGE PARCELS DIFFERENT? Implementation Strategies: LUP-46 Connect the main entry of buildings to public sidewalks by a clear, identifiable walkway. Implementation Strategies: LUP-47 Allow for on-street parking on internal City Center street grid. Implementation Strategies: LUP-48 Encourage transit use by improving pedestrian and bicycle linkages to the existing and future transit system. DUPLICATES LUP 44 AND LUP 45 Confidential Page 9 7/21/2005 Office Goals & Policies Goal LUG-8 Implement appropriate development standards for Office designated areas. Policies LUP-49 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be allowed as a part of mixed-use development in Office areas. Implementation Strategies: • Distinguish from applies to City Center LUP-50 Office areas may be appropriate in mixed use developments of residential, commercial and light industrial, provided there is adequate mitigation of land use conflicts and community character and property values are preserved. Implementation Strategies: • Explain conflicts anticipated LUP-51 Office areas shall include sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive working environment. Implementation Strategies: • Distinguish from City Center Mixed Use Goals & Policies Goal LUG-9 Encourage he development of mixed use areas that foster community identity and are designed to support pedestrian, bicycle and regional transit. Policies LUP-52 The characteristics of a mixed use area include: Implementation Strategies: • Housing and employment densities to support regional transit service; • Public transit connections • Safe, attractive transit stops and pedestrian and bicycle ways; • Buildings that front on wide sidewalks with attractive landscaping, benches and frequent bus stops; • Multi-story buildings oriented to the street rather than parking lots; and • Parking space located behind or to the side of buildings or in parking structures. Confidential Page 10 7/21/2005 DISTINGUISH FROM CITY CENTER LUP-53 The mix of land uses allowed.in either the Corridor Mixed Use or Mixed Use Center designation should include: • A variety of housing types including apartments, condominiums, row houses, two-family and single family on small lots; • A full range of retail goods and services including grocery stores, theaters/entertainment, restaurants, personal services and specialty shops; • Public/quasi-public uses and/or open space; • Professional Office and other employment oriented uses; and • Commercial uses that require large land areas, but have low employment density and are auto-oriented such as lumber yards, plant nurseries, warehouses, auto dealerships, etc. should be prohibited from either Mixed Use category. DISTINGUISH FROM CITY CENTER Industrial Goals & Policies Goal LUG-10 Provide for the development of well-planned industrial areas and ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in parcel sizes adequate to allow for future development as industrial uses. Policies LUP-54 Program capital facility expenditures to facilitate the development of lands designated for industrial uses. LUP-55 Encourage low-polluting industries to locate in Spokane Valley. LUP-56 Encourage shared-use parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. POLICIES DO NOT APPEAR TO SPEAK TO GOAL Goal LUG-11 A variety of strategically located heavy industrial areas should be designated and protected from conflicting land uses. Policies LUP-57 Commercial, residential and recreational uses should be limited or not allowed in areas designated for industry, except for small-scale ancillary commercial and recreational uses intended to primarily serve the industrial area. Confidential Page 11 7/21/2005 LUP-58 Conversion of designated industrial lands to other uses should be strictly limited in order to ensure adequate land supply and prevent inflation of land prices. LUP-59 Provide appropriate buffering, landscaping and other development standards for industrial areas. STRATEGIC LOCATION NOT ADDRESSED- LOCATION ALONG FREIGHT CORRIDORS AND INTERMODAL FACILITIES WOULD SEEM TO BE KEY HERE. Goal LUG-12 A variety of strategically located light industry areas should be designated and protected. Policies LUP-60 Commercial, residential and recreational uses shall be limited or not allowed in areas designated for light industry except for small-scale ancillary commercialand recreational uses primarily to serve the industrial area. LUP-61 Light industry areas shall include sidewalks, bike lanes and landscaping to provide a safe and attractive working environment. STRATEGIC LOCATION NOT ADDRESSED- Development Review Goals & Policies Goal LUG-13 Develop and maintain an efficient and timely development review process. Policies LUP-62 Maximize efficiency of the development review process by continuously evaluating the permitting process and modifying as appropriate. Implementation Strategies: • Specify provisions needing attention LUP-63 Assist developers with proposals by continuing to offer pre- application meetings in order to produce projects that will be reviewed efficiently. LUP-64 Conduct regular reviews of development regulations to determine how to improve upon the permit review process. Confidential Page 12 7/21/2005 SAME AS LUP 62 — IS REGULAR REVIEW DIFFERENT OR BETTER THAN CONTINUOUS? LUP-65 Integrate and coordinate construction of public infrastructure with private development to minimize costs wherever possible. Goals LUG-14 Improve the appearance and function of the built environment. Policies LUP-66 Use residential performance standards to maintain neighborhood character and ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. Do Community Design Guidelines establish performance standards? LUP-67 Use design and performance standards to achieve a greater range of housing options in multiple-family designations. LUP-68 Use design and performance standards to create attractive and desirable commercial and office developments. Community Design Guidelines? LUP-69 Designate aesthetic corridors along major transportation routes to provide a positive image of Spokane Valley. Aesthetic corridors shall be located along the following routes: • State Route 27 (Pines Road) • Appleway Boulevard (south side from Park to Dishman Mica) • Evergreen Road between Sprague Avenue and Indiana Avenue • Mirabeau Parkway • Dishman Mica Road from 8th Avenue, south to city limits LUP-70 Adopt specific regulations for designated aesthetic corridors that: • Provide incentives for aesthetic design; • Require landscaping buffers adjacent to roadways; • Limit sign height and size; • Provide performance standards to adequately screen intensive land uses that have exterior clutter such as outdoor storage, exterior heavy equipment and/or exterior fabrication/assembly. • Prohibit off-premise signage. Confidential Page 13 7/21/2005 LUP-71 Establish standards for the scale and intensity of commercial, retail and industrial signage that protect views and minimize signage clutter while allowing adequate business identification. LUP-72 Establish a "cap and replace" system for video boards/billboards and eliminate existing billboards wherever possible. Historic and Cultural Resources Goals & Policies Goals LUG-15 Identify and protect archeological and historic sites and structures to guide decision-making in resource planning, environmental review and resource management. Policies LUP-73 Identify and evaluate archaeological and historic sites to determine which should be preserved. Identification and evaluation is a constant, ongoing process. Implementation Strategies: • Historic Preservation regulations? • Local landmark designation? LUP-74 Develop methods to link cultural resource preservation with local economic development strategies, such as rehabilitation of commercial buildings, neighborhood revitalization and tourism. ?7977 LUP-75 Establish and maintain government-to-government relations with Native American tribes for the preservation of archaeological sites and traditional cultural properties. Land Use/Transportation Connection Goals & Policies Goal LUP-16 Provide for a well connected street system that minimizes dead-end and cul-de-sac streets. Policies LUP-76 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus or car. Cul-de-sacs or other closed street systems may be appropriate under certain circumstances including, but not limited to, topography and other physical limitations which make connecting systems impractical. Confidential Page 14 7/21/2005 LUP-77 Develop street, pedestrian path and bike path standards that contribute to a system of fully connected routes. Map Comments to Planning Commission Comment Period ending July 18, 2005 Draft Comp Plan Proposed No. Name Property Owner Parcel ID Location/Address Comment Designation Designation Corridor Mixed Regional 45072.6902 2409 and 2405 North Dick Rd Use/Low Density M-1 James H. Weber Same Residential Commercial Split zoned parcel...wants all designated commercial 55173.2601, 2604, Corridor Mixed John Sweitzer, 306 N. Barker Use/Medium Density Commercial M-2 Sweitzer Company, Inc. Vanderwal/Jeffreys 2606, 2607 Residential Properties should be designated commercial M-3 Kerry Orcutt N/A N/A Evergreen Road north of Sprague N/A N/A Supports Office designation along Evergreen Road "Business Requests"Business Park"comp plan category, or Mixed Use John G. Miller, N/A Mirabeau Parkway east of Pines Light Industrial/Office „ desgination for flexibility and to recognize current and projected M-4 Pincroft Business Park Pincroft, LLC Park or MU development John T. Peterson, Pring Medium Density Community Property desginated HDR in 2003. Office under construction. M-5 Corp. Pring, Corp 45144.0246 15318 E. Springfield Residential Commercial Requests Community Commercial Designation. M-6 Kerry Orcutt N/A N/A Evergreen Road north of Sprague N/A N/A Supports Office designation along Evergreen Road M-7 David Gump N/A N/A Evergreen Road north of Sprague N/A N/A Supports Office designation along Evergreen Road 45144.1147 15413 E. Valleyway' Medium Density Community M-8 Paul S. Redlin PSR Company Residential Commercial Requests Community Commercial M-9 Skipped . Mirabeau Ranch -West of Pines High Density Low Density Property is single-family homes and duplexes and should be returned M-10 Helen Sargent N/A Residential Residential to UR-3.5 zoning. M-11 David Orahood N/A N/A Ponderosa N/A N/A Supports 1 acre zoning in Ponderosa. Supports impact fees. M-12 Skipped 45333.9155, 9024 Dishman Mica and Bowdish Community Low Density Comp Plan Amendment changed designation to Com Corn in 2003- M-13 A J. Grant Person Riddle Commercial Residential Mapping Error M-13 B J. Grant Person Pomajevich Investments Co., LLC 45292.9119 16th and Dishman Mica Community NC Commercial Property currently zoned B-2, should retain zoning. M-13 C J. Grant Person Golden/Wesche 45152.1002 Vercler and Boone(Valley Hospital) Low Density Res Office/MDR Portion of property fronting Vercler proposed Office, balance MDR - 45103.0203, 0244, Mansfield between Mirabeau Parway High Density Northern section of property suited for high density with Office Mixed Use boardering Mansfield. 0245 and Pines Road, North of Indiana Residential Office/assembly on southern portion. Mixed M-13 D J. Grant Person Thomas Hamilton Use desingtion would be appropriate. 45133.0213, 0214, Broadway Avenue, across from High Density Office Property rezoned to UR-22 specifically for office use. Property M-13 E J. Grant Person Sonrise Land, LLC 0215 Walmart Residential directly south zoned UR-7 for hospice facility. Chuck Hafner, Rochford and Ponderosa Low Density Low Density M-14 Deanna Hormann Communities N/A Ponderosa and Rotchford Acres Residential Residential Supports Comp Plan as drafted. Wants areas to retain R-1 zoning. N/A East of Sullivan between Indiana and Mixed Use Mixed Use M-15 Robert J. Boyle Hanson Industries, INC Flora Supports Mixed Use designation for property east of Valley Mall. David Golden Jan Low Density M-16 Wesche Same See M-13 C See M-13 C Office/MDR Residential Portion of property fronting Vercler proposed Office, balance MDR 45133.0903 16202 East Valleyway Low Density Commercial? M-17 Danett L. Margeris Margeris, Pillsbury Residential Owner would like to build mini storage on property. 55173.1020 and East side of Barker between Sprague Medium Density Owner wants to use property for commercial on Barker with M-18 Verona Southern Verona Southern 1019 and Laberry Residential Mixed Use remainder used for multi-family. Currenity zoned UR-22. N/A Sprague Avenue City Center City Center Letter suggests that a new category be added called City Center M-19 F.J. Dullanty, Jr. Autonation, Inc. (Appleway Group) Reserve Reserve. High Density Medium Requests UR-7 designation for property developed with duplexes N/A View Ranch Estates/Pinecroft Density Res (Pinecroft)and for property recently approved for a subdivision (View M-20 Helen Sargent N/A Residential (UR-7) Ranch Estates). N/A View Ranch Estates High Density Low Density M-21 Jill Enzler N/A Residential Res (UR-3.5) Wants property zoned back to UR-3.5. Map Comments to Planning Commission Comment Period ending July 18, 2005 Draft Comp Plan Proposed No. Name Property Owner Parcel ID Location/Address Comment Designation Designation High Density Medium N/A View Ranch Estates Residential Density Res Requests UR-7 designation for property known as View Ranch M-22 Linda Gerkin N/A (UR-7) Estates. 45152.1002 Vercler and Boone(Valley Hospital) Low Density Office/MDR M-23 Jan and David Wesche Wesche/Golden Residntial Portion of property fronting Vercler proposed Office, balance MDR 45152.1027 and 1215 North McDonald Low Density Office Property is developed with office building. Owner would like to M-24 Eric Ellingsen, DDS Tucker Roy LLC (Ellingsen) 1023 Residential expand/develop offices on property directly north. Anderw Warlock, CLC M-25 Associates Tucker Roy LLC (Ellingsen) See M-24 See M-24 See M-24 See M-24 See M-24 — M-26 Gary Johnson Tucker Roy LLC (Ellingsen) See M-24 See M-24 See M-24 See M-24 See M-24 45153.3311, 3309 Former Albertson's store at Pines Community Regional Should not downzone this, or any, property within the City of Spokane M-27 Dwight J. Hume Harlan Douglas and 3310 and Sprague Commercial Commercial Valley. Community Appropriate N/A SR-27 between 3rd and 16th Commercial Commercial Pines Road not marketable for office development. Should retain M-28 Dwight J. Hume Joe Ward Desgination appropriate commercial zoning. Area currently zoned Heavy Industrial and designated Urban Activity North or Sprague, East of Havana, Regional N/A Mixed Use Center on Interim Comp Plan. Should be designated Reg. M-29 Dwight J. Hume Union Pacific Railroad West of Fancher Commercial g Commercial for expansion of commercial businesses in the future. Corridor Mixed 45072.6902 West of Dick Road, north side of Use/Low Density Corridor M-30A Planning Staff James A. Weber Trent Residential Mixed Use Split zoned parcel. Designated entire parcel Corridor Mixed Use. 45083.9012 East of Willow, north side of Mission, Low Density Res High Density M-30B Planning Staff east of Argonne/I-90 Interchange Residential Property currently pending Hearing Examiner decision for rezone. 451333.9155 and Dishman-Mica Road and Bowdish Low Densi Res Community Property received Comp Plan Amendment to Communtiy Commercial M-30C Planning Staff Riddle 9024 ty Commercial in 2004. 45144.0246 and West of Sullivan between Springfield Medium Density Property received Comp Plan Amendment to High Density 1147 and Valleyway Residential Office Residential for office usel in 2004. Property to the south currenity has M-30D Planning Staff Pring and Redlin office constructed on it. 45133.0118 South side of Broadway, across from Public/Quasi Public Medium M-30E Planning Staff Spokane Hospice Walmart Density Res Property should be designated for residential uses. 45133.0213, 0214, South side of Broadway, across from High Density Office M-30F Planning Staff Sonrise Land, LLC 0215 Walmart Residential Property previously zoned for Office use. 55173.2606, 2604, East of Barker, between Appleway Medium Density Corridor Parcels are adjacent to Post Office and are isolated from residential M-30G Planning Staff Vanderwal/Jeffreys 2601 and Laberry Residential Mixed Use neighbhorhood, bounded by Barker, Appleway and Laberry M-31 Skipped M-32 Shirley Rademacker N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Does not want Barker Rd. designated as truck route. 1 1 Draft CP- Revisions VT. orT )q' 1 1 1 t t Public Comment Map 1 ! , 1 —1 , , 1 .rw ., WelicsleyAvca , ter` i - - - . I �... s o s.'•t`Clb\`VL i p. '1" .-- Legend Town of ''""+�� Low Density Residential —EaelidAve �..y��:'"-�.�I��b,,i>w� liuclitl-l.+ Gid id-avc� City of Spokane Millwood Island P�� Il-/3D J Medium Density Residential Ato �U`tet —Buckeye 't/"1''1f-30`1 - :11-13D -Aawcua-t - High Density Residential —� L y I r \I'.iugum.n-.\rc� �pj Mixed Use '9!r„-1vt:m.,ticld•t.I. ICI dl-13D j_____ -Knox-Ave pry _ - r- 1` • ►-� + Corridor Mixed Use to 91) ` •stztu -.,i „� s M+scion Avc 'y�--...41,--5 .k.- hsq+ -\1Ib' -_,v `'• Mission-Ave Office `'r��'. �h,'iuu-hvr 'Vw_' 11-13E,,11-30T moi; 41 JJ •''' sh.' \'j i' tl-/3C, 11-23 7 (i JOt6 f” �� '' -g. I ` dl-2,;t1-30G City Center �-� =� i11-5,:11-30D r = t•� s } b ,. - � 1-30B _Broadway vc ®s5.in M klipippilia___..,:••96mb 11-�,JI-3pG Public/Quasi-Public o �' li ._ _. 1 *:. Neighborhood Commercial e Valleyway Ave Valle a+y-Av 4 \\\ +s- Valleyway Avc Vallcyway Av i,1„ Y o \\p�ew,ly'' , �\ II �W , ■• I Community Commercial Vie!\ �� `14th -�\I. _. ..... I ��a�� .- - p > .. I �� \\\ \\\\. V ®. \\ Regional l . k. t.03/k1.111'1. ilik 11-18 Commercial .. -Third-Ave // - E� ��� _` _ ? i11-8,;11-30D �i' four 1-, e9 -----'- C t _ J �. , _Ae •U r hI-2� Shelley , Light Industrial Lake, 1 Ei hlhzlvc 77. Ei uh-Acc=- •.. Eighth-Ave [.% Ei_Ehili5AvC-- - •� - ,i , Heavy Industrial b 91 1 ' ' Park/Open Space / 1 z H t Other Municipalities C6t1�71vo IGd1-Avc >o II ‘.L' - - - p m I Saltct ' ' ��_ v�� , _ + , Se�� z _ _ i- - - 1 Urban Growth Area 11 t ' 1 t ii, Water Bodies ' - -_ I _ _ I I:1I-Li81 24th-Ave �ith A e '4thA� o v : ` g o I 1 — —, I i S, i , ti 1 Map Location iP� 3?nd-4vc - ,2+1d Awe - '• - -. ' I , 1 1 1N 1 , I i 1=1/1\ 27 4 _' o ) I Date:8/22/05 _ •po7zane� '1L = I ,Valle 4f I- '4th-Ave 1 ,11-13A,dl-30C - - 0 0.5 1 2 Miles e - I 1 - - - - _ _ I i I I I i I I I I % Notice: The information shown on this map is compiled from various 1 1 sources and is subject to constant revision. The City makes no claims _- or guarantees about the accuracy or currency of this map and a - expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its contents. To confirm accuracy contact the City of Spokane Palley.Community 1 ' ' Development Department,Division of Planning,(509,1 921-1000. ` + NomProduct of the City of Spokane Valley,Community Development Department