1994, 03-09 Permit App: CUE-09-94 Conditional Use•
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE ZONING ADJUSTOR
Name of Applicant:\--.\��\\\5l`p gent: 0 N 1(>
Street Address: `..004:\ 1j O '12\1 Y\ 17
A
\ 1- Zip
City` +� lifl: State: Code \\,, /
Name of Property Owner(s): \CRAP i Rep of P� l SM\5-e
Street Address:2,. \ \�� ,' t4 ICY\
Zip nnhone - Home: G A1'i HT)
City: p t State: Code: `?H ao Work: `2e-tlnpd
Phone - Home: cj k (V
Work: i -
Agent's No.: N
REQUESTED ACI'ION(S) (Circle appropriate action):
Variance(s)
Other:
Conditional Use Permit
Expansion of a
Nonconforming Use
FOR STAFF USE 'ONLY
rr Violation/
Section lh Township { 1-12--/
) Range 'Y Enforcement: Y
•Lot and legal checked by: / •CWWP sewer purveyor:
•CWSP water purveyor: [4649_11,41 ee.P247 Lf •CUP standards met: Y N NA
g ue- n Cite applicable section: .IGI • P, /(n • c) Li O (L/)
•Exisfin zone: , ,
•Comp. Plan designation: U ON1-•Arterial Road Plan designation:
•Fire District: • 14 1 • •Person doing preapp conf.:
•Other/previous Planning Department actions involving this property:
•Certificate of Exemption No.: OF----9L1—C14 Application No.:
•HearingDate:•
poo --(r
ABOUT THE PRO /R
TY
•Existing use of property:
•Site plan dime sionin checked by:
�pn,�o 5(
t('4.>1n_P
by ap�1Iicant)
'4
•Describe proposed use of the property, noting chan e from 'existing use: -
{Z(3�illP,ne e, RA \n Ni\V(v.�)V16efie,
Ywa- ce application, state the Code standard and des e- • - variance -sought -in -earn -parable
tetuis (i.e. tfrorn-cent "u - nes - e siren 65 feet):
• a conditional use permit application, does proposal meet all standards
W "1=ab-one_o-mere-varimiues been ieque-st
•What is the size of the subject property..
•Street address of property (if known):g,1 tat • +1 i ir1 -
•Legal description of plopertv",(include_easement, if applicable):
OPPORTUNITY PT -OF BLK'"12'6'471/2' OF, S1'/2 'OF S1/2 OF.Wl/2 OF
Parcel No(s)>y4t
.: "4":.)/401
j 1 (n)-3)
•Sdurce of legal: ' � IS (L -a r) ,1 fet- KC!
•Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner sponsor and/or agent:
•What interest do you (applicant) hold inthe property? ik lab ...A • a
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
I SWEAR, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT: (1) I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OR
AUTHORJ7FD AGENT FOR THE PROPOSED SITE;; (I3OT THE OWNER, WRIT 1EN PERMISSION
FROM OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON BEHALF IS ATTACHED; AND (3) ALL OF
THE ABOVE RESPONSES AND THOSE ON SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND
TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
ZA!APP (REV.,t/44)
ate 3—e1-19Jj
c on G P &J
is in and for the state of Washington, re •d3 • a
. My appointment expires: /It
page 1 of 2
zJozaFEd
(176/I 'A32I).ddV/VZ
(are q aznleu2ls)
sprEpuels puE sluaurai'7' Jo pauuoJul
uaaq seg 1uEagdd2 aq,J, 'IEsodoid ag1 ssnoslp o1 plail uaaq set{uopegnsuoo ,CrEunugasd
�5qv� -3' t d j ) :HoAanxna aoYHaMas • q
(=Q) (arrneu2Is)
•Iesodoid sup anzas o1 apem uaaq lou OAegjOAE4 sluauraSue.ue X1o1aeJsues
'gown a1Enbape pit ales sup woos 01 alge lou aze/amm am
•laulslp manna mo go lrepunoq alp uulpin paieool lou sysl IEsodo.id ata
•Ease aOTAias aming mo 3o £.repunoq alp unpin paleool lou sysl IEsodom oily
:HoaanNna Ha.LVM
(nolaq q# aas) 'spzcpuels puE sluauuarinbaz
lesodslp a2eemas Jo pauuo;ul auzooaq 01
Tpin lesodozd alp ssnoslp o1 pa.nnbaz sl lueolldde auj [ ]
(nolaq e# aas) 'spzepuels puE sluauiannbaz
mals.fs zalem;o pauuogul awooaq o1
qp(n lesodord alp ssnasrp o1 pannbar sl 1Qnolldde ata [ ]
(L2uluuela Xa panrem JJo-1121S)
— 17 —a
711 Ging t. QV, h1112.2 71 INA1lrm • 'sp.repuens pue sluamannbar;o
pauuojul uaaq sEq 1uEagddr aqy jEsodozd aq1 ssnaslp 91 Nati uaaq seq uon>=llnsuoa ketru xgazd v
(VNIAIAI aPJs1no 3l •
Oman XEru luauruedaa 2uluucld) INJJAJ HVdaQ samiI.LR A.LNROO aNV?IOdS •£
(panJEmJgo-u Ts) • (aleu) (am u21s)
10 17v W
A luaaaredar fuTUUEld gprn uopEllnsuoa Tsanb am pzepuels .. • s a , inbazgo
pauuoaaq sEq lueatjdde ata 'lesodoid aql ssnaslp of p uaoq sal uopEllnsuoa Tunlazd y
(no! •Ala spun); ag ' $ul.laau a)
INaIALUIVdaa S}I11OA1 2I'I2Rd A.LNROD a VNIOdS 'Z
(paATEA133o-u$iS)
le co
meu3Js)
N A luauruedar uluueld glen uopEllnsuoa lsanibaz am 'sp •.ems puE manna -tuba.' go
pauuo;ul uaaq sEq luwagdde arty •lesodozd aq1 ssnasip o1 Nag uaaq sEq uonrllnsuoakreunullazd v
--A �� :IEsodscp 02Enas 3o poglaw pasodozd (q
� :Xlddns .alen;o poglaur pasodozd (g
• CigIH.LSIQ H.L'IVaH A.LNROO aNVNOdS •T
(molaq papJla sr •ou asogei £aua4u gaEa lisp Jsnur ;uEalldde)
saIONaov HaH1O QNd siNawnivdau £LNROR AR ddO-LAOIS • 1
•uopEogdde moX TIP?, 1?
ruruar pue lno uuo; ag1 fug amid 'rapsuoa lsnur zolsnfpy 2uluoZ all galgn Eualuo aql sassazppe
galgn Xen E ul as -ea most luasafd noX dlaq 01 pau8lsap (ala `asn ltuoplpuoo `aouuumn) uotoc
palsanbar most _tog uuo; E uanT2 uaaq anal pinogs noX `Xl$urpioaay •uouto lddd'ag1 2uiAOzddE ;o' •
JOAE3 ul luaum$zn alseq all glzo; Ind Xgezalll of pue panordde aq wogs NOJ.1:7V •Q'd.J,Sanna2J
aql Aqn suoseaz aql gsgglu
elsa 01 anfEasardaz Sag/SIM zo luealldde Q111:401 Xzessaau.srli
(JueallddE Sq) (s)urao3 3OOHd do :Nat1fni •V
I t
1
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT BURDEN OF PROOF FORM
Name: L\N T - WOo\JEQ—
File:
V. CONDITIONAL USES State Law, Section 36.70.020 (7), clarifies that the County
regulations must specify the standards and criteria that shall be
applied in the review by the Zoning Adjustor. Additionally,
condition of approval may be added to assure compatibility with
other uses in the same zone.
A . Assuming the proposal is listed as a "permitted" conditional use, do you believe the
proposal meets all of the required, established and applicable standards?
n U,2P O Sats S� L o tiW c L '— V\ GZ.
k X C E ESJ \lam_ COU y QE Q U I? -Z vv\ E tJ T S
• I1 you cannot meet e co
applying for an administrative exception or a Vanan
uired standards, are you seeking relief by
Circle One)
C. What have you done or could you do to:
1. Make the use compatible with other permitted activities in the same vicinity or
zone?
W 1 Ll_. \-\1/4A0 1-C E, i VOA Q AL \ A l S C t^ t t pit) 0
s A t.„-ckN bScLAP tit;C, 'TO E-N,)S e i WF PR1 VAC -N
OF t\} E 1 G c,-)
2. Ensure against imposing excessive demands upon public utilities?
%\1 (2_0--r Pa(2Yr - )1T\Q Okz bGPc-tJDG1,31' eAk\lS) V--eStn1►G ftJ
—T i+tr to owtG , 02 R -N- 1 u e g S Ma0-G- SA Sit cru D v.) p ; 1 VJC-2EaSE.
T E C>Ev ,:) DS ON u-aLAT' kGS ►^i‘o2E. wc VERAGi< MuSENotf ►
D. Explain how or why the proposal will not be detrimental to:
1. The Comprehensive Plan: \d \S \A) \ LL c5 t -O U; C' 20V LE, S O LC.
CNOPe-1E.702-- Ci Ll k ESS ;and
2. Surrounding property: \.1..) ‘2„ e O t SRwRr t u Test
SPP etizalOce ccF -TAE E IS-- 1 u. Q -SV C-tU, S
E. What reasonable restrictions, conditions or safeguards will uphold the spirit and intent
(health, safety and general welfare) of the Zoning Code AND mitigate any adverse
effect upon the neighboring properties - - including but not limited to: 1) time limits; 2)
front, side or rear yard greater than minimum stated; 3) suitable landscaping; 4) signing;
5) off-street parking; and 6) others?
` \t \ s vs) '?-
>‘\'P 0 ttsYTmW_OUL
\.k = Ss - 3 -' A -S w CL1� T
\x-) \ CAA. i- N i 2 c \= cYM tK) o7 \ Cz t k
\.) 1 S i Ci t L. t T`-.1 \W ;,
CIA) t .>✓1 \-V !JQQ +'/\-A u S t 03 G S 5
OuC= TUU t)v),
0 -►.Du ct nlG o S
CUP; BURDEN OF PROOF FORM
REV; 1/91