PE-1168D-78 & ZE-13-78 i Ir
~ . ~ ~ + ~ ' ~
. ~ « ' •
l + V t r
~ ♦ N ~ ti
l(~ ~j.~~ r
~ ~.r~•. ~ ~ • fs y 11
~ ` \ • ~ ~ N
.
J
....2,.~ %
~ 'z?-~- ~ , • ~ .
. ~
IL ^'fH
~ ~ ♦ , - , [ ' ~ t
w Q 40 ~ , . t►-
,i~ ' _ ~ ~ ~ • f,rY'
~
~Z0 72d ~
~►i p, n ~
~ e t e r W
• r • ~ T c~rd ►~►~dd.~ L TN \s J ~
W.
v ~ ' vJ ► ~ .,,~~i.
N ..J. J d r ..,,v ~ ~
...L
>
T ♦ ~
'r f ` 19
.N'~~ • ~ + ~ _ _Q ~ ` ~
A 1 3 c~T `
y~"'•'~ . La~ ~r~,~ Z ~ ~S'~ ~
tA
r pf-
0
• 2 , ~ ' ~
• ~ ' • = v. F ~ a
p'd p►5
~J ~JA. . . ~v~}~• p~ is~ ~ ~.r►+' ~
Z
7 T~
, tr r • ` ~r - 2
T H ~ s? • 7 '
i, 1• 2 1 ~ , t. `
Q ' • _ J
-T t4
z 4
~ ~ ~ 'r e ~ • ~
NOk, .
• ~ .
I ~ ~ jC ~ _ ~y ~ • ~
L r i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M 1 )
lr
is p „
, - ' ~ST • 4~'i" °
,
.
t l
us
~ ~ ~ t • ~ ~ 1, ~ ~ , y
~y S cl
~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ • ~ ? • 1 ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ i ) i _ '
r - t ~ ' ,t+-• ' , • , . f
A~l ..1 i~ • j o , , • ~v
S W t ~ ~ ~ • ' ~ ~ ~
' ' ,,.lh y 1' `r , ~ , , .7 1~ } 1 •~y t
_ t ' . , ~ it (~Y,~.~~~~
cr;~,~
a `
4 ~ ~ ♦ , ' ~ ` u ~ }
~ 1 `
~
`i~ f • -_,~,~.~~r~ , ! 1
~ ~ ~ • J ~ ~ . ~
Y
y ` ~ . ~ ' ~ • ~ ~
i~ • ` ~ ~ ~ , , ~
- ~ , • f , E. -
t,j~' ~ ' _34_ r -
I•~~ ~ . , ~ F .
i J ~ ~
1 ' , ► _
. ~
.
PLNNNINU REPORT
April lb, 1985
T0: SPUKNNE I;UUNTY HEAkING EXWIINEk GONiMITTEE
FftUM: SF'UKANE CUUNTY PLANN IN6 UEPARTMENT STAFF
KE : t;NNNGE UF GUNU IT IUNS
NE-11 bt3U-78, MIU ILUME 4Th AUU 1liUN
l:hange of 14 Lots to k-L zoni ng
1. bLNtkNL INFURMATIUN
Sponsor: b14-913l Surve.yor/Engi neer: 92b-1 31Z
Mi di lome, lnc. Mi ke Phi 11 i ps
(./o Ed Bueshke N. yUy Argonne koad
W. bUb 3rd Avenue Spokane, WN 99212
Spokane, WA 992U1
Location: The proposed R-2 zoning would be situated adjacent and
westerly of Nines Road between 32nd and 0th Avenue.
t'roposal: To classify 24 lots of Midilome 4th Addition to R-2
zoning from the previously approved R-1 zone. The applicant
anticipates duplex development of the lots with individual units
owned by the occupant as a single family attached structure.
11. S ITt PLAN INFUWMH7 IUN
A. Gomprehensi ve Pl an: Urban wi thi n the I'ri ori ty Sewer Service Area.
B. Site l;haracteristics: The area is relatively flat and
bordered by a ma,jor county arterial to the east (Pines koad).
C. Neigborhood Characteristics: The Midilome development is
currently all zoned R-1 and has a portion of the development in
single family homes. Uuplex and apartment•residences lie to the •
north of the proposal at 32nd. A convenience store is also located
there. 1wo schools are immediately east of the proposal along Nines
koad.
U. loni na:
Nroposal - kecl assi fy 1 and presently Hgri cul tural to R-2.
, Site - txisting Agricultural, Preliminary Plat.
North - Local Business, PIFS, Agricultural Suburban.
East - Agricultural.
South - Agricultural.
West - Agricultural. .
-35-
PLANN INU kEPUkT, Apri 1 1b, 1 yb5 PE-11 b8D-78, M IU ILUIYIE 4TN AUU IT rON
II. SITE PLAN INFUwilATION (Gont'd)
E. Land Use:
Site - Vacant.
North - Multiple family, commercial, park.
East - Vacant, Norizon Junior High School, Chester Elementary.
South - Vacant.
West - Single family residences.
F. Speci al Informati on:
Ci rculation - The lots proposed for R-2 zoni ng front on a major
arterial.
Uesign - The divided duplex proposal will be in acco rdance with
Secti on 4.17.15U of the Spokane Gounty Zoni ng Ordi nance.
Uensity - The twenty four lots will have 1 unit per 5,75U square
fieet approximately, or 11,5UU square feet for each duplex.
Urai nage - No si gni fi cant probl ems are noted.
Water SuPP1y - Model irrigation Uistrict #18 will provide water.
Nn approved Water Plan will be required prior to finalizing this
prel i rni nary pl at.
Sewaqe Uisposal - The proposed R-2 lots are to be connected to a
publ i c sewer system.
School - The proposal is in the Central Valley School Uistrict
#356. The Fire District and (:ounty Building and Safety Uepartment
(Fi re hlarshal 1) are requi red to approve fi re protecti on provi si ons
pri or to fi nal i zi ng the prel i mi nary pl at.
Cultural Resources - None have been identified
III. HISTURY/ANNLYSiS
hiidilome 4th Addition is currently a Gounty approved preliminary plat
dating back to 1979. R-1 zoning was requested and approved at that time.
Westerly portions of the Midilome proj ect have been finalized and are
currently zoned It-l.
IV. ENV IkUIJMENTAL REV IEW
Nn Environmental Checklist has been reviewed by the County Planning
Uepartment staft. The review connsidered the specifics of the proposal,
Gounty ordi nances and other regul ati ons. (:ounty 1'1 anni ng Uepartment has
determined that "No probable signiticant adverse impacts" would result
from the proposal being developed and has issued a Uetermination of
Non-Significance ('_UNS").
-36-
• tl ,
NLHI4I4INU ktNUKT, Hpri 1 1 ts, 1 yb5 NE-11 btsu- %6, Ih IU ILUIYIt 4TN HUU IT 1
!Y, tnvi ronrnental Kevi ew ( l:ont ; d)
The "UNS" was circulated to seven other agencies ofi jurisdiction and
other agencies/departments affected by the future development for review
ana cominent.
The Hearing Examiner (.ommittee may consider additional environmental
related testimony and the "UNS" at the public hearing.
Y. LEAU HbENCY SUNIMHkY
'(he proposal is consistent witn the density and land use guidelines of
the Spokane Gounty c:omprehensive Plan. The higher density is located on
an arterial which is in accord with the objectives of the l;omprehensive
Nlan for urean areas O.I.W.
V I. CUNU rT IUNS UF Hf'PItUVHL
If approval i s granted, the fol 1 owi ng condi ti ons are recornrnended.
l. That the 1=ina1 Plat be designed substantially in conformance with the
prelirninary plat of record as legally described and advertised. No
increase of density or lot number shall occur without prior approval of
the heari ng Exami ner c,omrni ttee.
2. That the prelirninary plat be given conditional approval for three (3)
years to lyiay 1, lybb. The applicant may request an txtension of Time by
submittiny a written request forty-five (45) days prior to the above
expiration date.
.3. Prior conditions of approval of the Midilome aevelopment are incorporated
with this proposal.
4. Upon fi 1 i ny the F i nal I'1 at, the zone change of the (.hanye of Condi ti on
area shall be finalized and the existing Ngricultural zone classification
snall be changed to k-2.
5. That the final plat dedication include: "No detached single family
dwellinys or manufactured homes are allowed on the "divided duplex"
lots. That all lots with any lot line designated Genter Uuplex Lot Line
shall be restricted to one common wall dwelling unit (1/2 Uuplex);
provided the duplex common wall is aligned over or with the Center Uuplex
Lot Line; and provided that each duplex unit (half) is totally on its
side of said center lot line when said lot line is extended vertically
beyona the rvofline."
b, 1-hat tne final plat inap is to identify the duplex common wall lot line
as: (,tNl"tK uUPLtX LuT LINt and the line is to be draftea as a continuous
"dash-dot-dash."
-37-
. . ,
. " .
PLANN IN~G KLPUKT, apri 1 18, 1985 FE-1168U-78, MIU ILUME 4TH AUU IT IUN
V I. CUNU IT IONS UF APPROVNL ((:o nt ; d)
Planning Uepartment (Cont'd)
7. That a pl an for water faci 1 i ti es adequate for fi re protecti on be approved
by the water supplier, fire protection district, Spolcane County Building
& Safety Uepartment and County Nealth authorities. The agencies will
certify on the WATER PLAN, prior to the filing of the final plat or any
phase of the preliminary plat that the plan is in conformance with their
respective needs and regulations. The WATER PLAfJ and certification will
be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
The purveyor will also certify that appropriate contractual arrangements
and schedule of improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for
construction of the water system in accordance with the approved WATEk
PLAN. The time schedule will provide for completion of the water system
and i nspecti on by the appropri ate heal th authori ti es pri or to appl i cati on
for building permits within the final plat. The arrangernents or _
agreements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the
purveyor harrnl ess f rom cl ai ms by any 1 ot purchaser refused a bui 1 di ng
permi t due to the fai 1 ure of the pl at sponsor to sati sfactori ly compl ete
the approved water sy stem.
The plat sponsor shall also sign said WATER PLAN to confirm the
contractual arrangements o r agreements.
The final plat dedication will contain the following statement: "the
public water system, pursuant the WNTER PLAN approved by Gounty and State
health authorities, the local fire district, County building & Safety
Department, and water purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and
the subdivider/sponsor will provide for individual domestic water service
as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot and
prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot."
8. No extension of finalizing the lots is part of this application.
GOUNTY ENGINEER UEPARTI+IENT
y. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedication of
Right-of-Way and approval of the road sy stem as indicated in the
preliminary plat of record.
lU. That plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to Gounty standards
showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the
Gounty Enyineer for approval prior to construction and/or the filing of
each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the direction of a
licensed Professional Givil Engineer.
11. That drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of
drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval
pri ur to constructi on and/or the fi 1 i ng of each fi nal pl at. Urai nage
plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil
Engi neer.
-38-
l • • ` • '
PLHNNINb ktPUkT, April 18, 1985 PE-1168U-78, MIUILUME 4TN AUUITIUN
VI. CONUITIUNS UF APPKOVAL (Cont'.d)
County Engineer Uepartment (Cont;d)
12. f;onstruction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be
performed under the di rect supervi si on of a 1 icensed engi neer/surveyor,
who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a
certificate in writing that all imNrovements were installed to the lines
and grades sfiown on the approved construction plans and that all
disturbed monuments have been replaced.
13. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed
publ i c ri ght-of-way unti 1 a permi t has been i ssued by the Gounty
Engi neer. Al l work i s subject to i nspection 'and approval by the Gounty
Engi neer.
14. All construction within the existing or proposed public Kight-of-Way is
to be completed prior to filing each final plat or a bond in the amount
estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction of
improvements, construction certification, ";As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County
Engi neer.
15. No direct access from lots to 1/2 Right of Ways until such roads are
constructed to County Standards and establ i shed as l:ounty Roads.
16. That appropriate provisions be made that the following described property
be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or
deeded: A 1-ft. strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate
or border the final plat boundary. (Temporary Gul-de-Sacs are required
when streets terminate at the Final Plat boundaries.)
17. A statement must appear in the dedicatory language of the final plat:
~'that i ndi vi dual dri veway access permi ts be requi red pri or to i ssuance of
a bui ldi ng permi t fior dri veway approaches to the County road system."
18. A dedi cati on of 1 Uft. addi ti onal Ri ght of Way al ong 32nd Avenue.
19. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be
allowed from Lot 4, Block Z. Lots 1 and 7. Block l, Lots 8 and lU, Block
3, Lots 6 and 12, Block 9, Lots 12 and 14, Block 11 to Pines Road.
2U. That sidewalks are required along the arterial on Pines Koad.
21. Public Road Standard TYPICAL Roadway Section
(1) Section Number 2 for Loretta Drive, Minirnum Paving width Collector
Standard; (Z) Secti on Number Z for 37th Avenue, Mi ni mum Pavi ng wi dth
Collector Standard; (3) Section Number 2 for Bowdith Road, fhinimum
Paving width Secondary Arterial Standard; (4) Section Number 'L for
Interior Roads, Minimum Paving width Access Standard; (5) Section Nurnber
2 for 32nd Avenue, ivli nimum Pavi ng wi dth 14a,jor Arteri al Standard.
-39-
• • ~ `
PLANNINU REPukT, April 18, 1985 PE-1168D-78, MIUILOME 417h ADUITIUN
VI. CUNUITIUNS OF APPKOVAL (Cont:a)
County Engineer Department (Gont'd)
22. The word ~'applicant" shall include the owner or owners of the property,
his heirs, assigns and successors.
23. To construct the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with
the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be a willing participant
in any petition or resolution which purposes is the formation of a Road
Improvement Uistrict (RID) for said improvements pursuant to RCW 3b.882
as amended. At such time as an RIU i s created or any Road Improvement
Proj ect i s sancti oned by Spokane l;ounty, the Improvements requi red ( curb,
sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) will be at
the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their heirs, grantees and
assigns. This provision is applicable to improvements specified for 32nd
Hvenue.
24. Hs an alternative method of constructing the road improvement stated
herei n, the apl icant may, wi th ttie approval of the l,ounty Engi neer,
accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and
participating in a County Road project (CkP) to the extent of the
required road improvement. At such time as a RIU is created or any Road
Improvement Proj ect i s sancti oned by Spokane County, the Improvements
required (curb, sidewalk, drainage control and paving to existing
pavement) will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, their
heirs, grantees and assigns. This provision is applicable to
improvements specified for 32nd Nvenue.
25. That the following statement be placed in the plat dedication: The
owners, ttieir heirs, grantees and assiyns, agree to join in the formation
of a County Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88 at such time
as a Road Improvement Di strict i s created or any Road Improvement Project
is sanctioned by Spokane Gounty. The improvements required (curb,
sidewalk, drainage control and paving) will be at the sole expense of the
owner, their heirs, grantees and assigns. This provision is applicable
to improvements specified for 32nd Nvenue.
'Lb. The proposed plat shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane
County board of Gommissioners Resolution No. 8U-1592, as amended, which
establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees in new
construction.
27. That the Gounty Engineer has examined this development proposal and has
determined that the impacts of this proposal upon the existing County
Road System warrants the roadway improvements herein specified.
-40-
• ti•
PLANNINU ktPURT, April 18, 1985 PE-11680-78, MIUILOME 4Th AUUITIUN
VI. GUNUITIUNS UF HPPKUVAL (Gont~d)
County Engineer Uepartment (Cont'd)
28. This plat or development proposal is located withio a drainage basin
which has been identified by the Spokane County Engineer;s Uffice as
haviny storrnwater runoff problems. Since this plat or development
proposal i s affected by or i s a contri butor to stormwater fl ows, property
owners should participate in the planning and implementaton of a future
basinwide stormwater management system. The following "Gondition of
Npproval" shall be required: That the owner(s) or successor(s) in
i nterest agree to j oi n i n any County approved Stormwater Management
Program and to pay such rates and charges as may be fixed through public
hearings for service or benefit obtained by the planning, design,
constructing, maintaining, or opera'tion of stormwater control facilities.
COUIJTY UTILITIES UENAkTMENT GUNDITIONS
28. All units must connect to the public sewer system.
29. Water service for this proposal shall be provided in accordance with the
Goordi nated Water System P1 an for Spokane County.
CUUNTY FtEALTh D ISTK ICT (;UND IT IUNS
3U. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the
preliminary plat of record for distribution by the Planning Uepartment to
the utility companies, Gounty Engineer, and Spokane County Health
Uistrict. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies
must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
31. A statement shall be placed in the dedication to the effect that: "A
public sewer system will be made available for the plat and individual
service will be provided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individual
on-site sewage systems shall not be authorized."
32. Water service shall be by an existing public water suply when approved by
the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Social & health
Services.
BUILUING & SAFETY UENaRT(IENT
33. The applicant or successor prepare the Water Plan for this site in
conformance with standards of Spokane County Uniform Fire Code, as
amended.
-41-
~
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PU6LIC HEARING
i~ --1 I 7e
APPL I CAT ION NO :
(Check one)
I would like to be on record in
FAVOR
~ OPPOSITION
l r NEUTRAL Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
Y ES
/ r NO
r)
YOUR NAME C 1-4 f3C-
(please print)
Address: SaL
N'G
. TN ~
F E. YY1 t~ i w~cv~ ~ t~ U S E:"R~.s~
L -
.
REVIEWED BY: DATE:
v~ v
The dedication of this final plat shall include the classification of the soil at each building
site, to include contour topography map of the proposed building site prior to issuance of any
building permits.
# 2
The Building Official may require substantiating data for cut and fills used to support the
foundations of any buildings and structures. This may require a professional engineered
approved site drainage plan and/or footing and foundation design.
N3
There is a high potential for soil erosion impacts during and after construction, particularly
in areas of steep slopes. Individual home sites will require landscaping to provide erosion
control.
# 4
A water plan showing location, size, etc. will be required for approval. The hydrants shall be
7nstalled prior to the building permit and construction of the complex. Each hydrant shall be
capable of flowing a mtnimum of g.p.m. at p:s.i. residual when any two (2) hydrants
are flowing simultaneously. These hydrants sha7T6e placed so that no portion of the building
is more than feet from the hydrant.
k5
Each building constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of access
roadways with all-weather driving surface of not less than feet of unobstructed width with
aCequate roadway turning radius ( feet and a minimum of feet outside) capable of
supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus and having a mjni-mum of feet, inches
of vertical clearances. Al1 roadway grades to be approved by fire district.
#6
The development shall be provided with at least two (2) points Lo the public street. The
access locations shall be approximately on opposite ends of the development.
07
Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on all new and existing buildings in such a
position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronttng the property.
Said numbers shall contrast with their background.
#8
Reclassification of an existing building shall require an application for change of occupancy
permit and subsequent inspection for approval.
b9
° Due to the sensitive storage requirements over the Aquifer, and this site lies within the Waste
water Management Area, we feel that some language should address the possible storage of
flammable or critical materials within these structures. # 10
Trash enclosures shall not be located adjacent to combustible construction or underneath
windows or nonprotected eaves.
N11
Building permits will be required for each structure. ,
# 12
Where it is desired to have access control gates in residential developments, the following
shall apply :
The minimum width of roadway, inside of access gate, shall be twelve feet (12'). There shall
be at least two (2) such drive approaches where the gates are located. One may be used for
vehicles exiting. Tire flatting spikes shall not be used unless the entrance is a minimum of
twenty feet (20') wide. The gates shall be provided with an approved method of emergency
operation in accordance with the fire department standards. Where each drive approach is less
than twenty feet (20') in width and controlled by gates, a secondary means of access shall be
provided with a clear, Lwenty feet (20') unobstructed opening. -
A13 '
Each structure shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of access roadways with
ail-weather driving surface capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus. The
minimum paved roadway width, inside curb face to inside curb face, shall be twenty-four feet
(24') with no parking. Parallel parking is permitted on one side with road widths a minimum of
LhI rty feeL (30'). Parallel parking i s permitted on both sides with road widths a minimum of
thirty-six feet (36'). Si gns noting such is required for fire lane. The turning radius of
private roadways and drive aisles shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') inside and a minimum
of forty-five feet (45') outside to the curb face. Cul de sacs more than stx hundred feet
(600') from the center line of the nearest cross street shall have a minimum radius of thirty -
~ seven feet, six inches (37'6") (75' diameter).
~
# la
The site is located in Fire District .
# 15
The proposed structure will requi re some revisions to provide the required fire flow for this
structure. Having calculated the fire flow requirements based upon the presented plan, a fire
flow of g.p,m, is required for this complex. it appears that hydrants will be
required.
416
, Fire hydrants are requi red to be i nstalled and serviceable in accordance with the Spokane
County Department of Building and Safety prior to development. The water plan shall show each
fire hydrant and be in compliance with the provisions in Chapter 10.04 of the 1979 edition of
the Uniform Fire Code. The present design requires a minimum fire flow of g.p.m. for
minutes. The water plan shall specify the gallons per minute for each fireiyarant at a
res^riua' :)~PSSUrD of no less than p.s.i. (minimum pressure).
.
~ - -
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY
1 ~
-
~
# 11
A signature block for each agency of review is required on approved plans noting compliance
with all department requirements prior to issuance of building permtts.
# 18
Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A water plan is
required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development.
#19
A plan for emergency equipment access is required to be submitted prtor to any land
development.
#20
installation of fire hydrants shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane
County Department of Building and Safety.
021
Mains and hydrants shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County
Oepartment of Building and Safety.
a22 '
water supply cistern shall be installed with adequate fire flow.
N23
Recommend approval with the condition that prior to development of this property (finalization
of this plat) an engineered water distribution system plan shall be submitted to the Spokane
County Department of Building and Safety. This distribution plan shall include water main
size, flows, locations, fire hydrant type and locations, water storage tank size and
location(s), and design criter i a. ~
'
a2 4
Fire hydrants which meet the fire flow are required to be 9nstalled prior to any tonstruction.
These hydrants shall be placed so that no portion of the building exter9or is more than 175
feet from the hydrant. The bottom of the lowest outlet of the hydrant shall be no less than 18
inches above grade. A water plan showing each fire hydrant (specifying the gallons per minute
for each fire hydrant) and meeting the requirements in Chapter 10.04 of the Uniform Fire Code
ts required prior to constructton of the water service. All required fire protection
facilities shall be installed and made serviceable prior to and durin9 the time of
construction.
# 25
The required fire flow for this project based on present presented plan is G . P . M . E a c h
•hydrant shall be capable of flowing 1500 G.P.M. at 20 P.S.I. residual when any two hydrants are
flowing simultaneously.
N26
Plat sponsor to provide written verification from Fire District to the Department of
Building and Safety that provisions have been made for adequate fire protection prior to
finalization of this plat.
k27
Existing hydrant(s) meet the minimum requirements for fire protection.
ation to state: fire separation walls are required on the common walls between units.
=
Verification of the separation walls is required. Plat sponsor/agent is required to request
verification from the Oepartment of 6uilding and Safety and to file a verification statement
signed by the building inspector in conjunction with a property owners maintenance agreement as
a title notice prior to occupancy of any units.
a29
Fire hydrants not indicated. Hydrant locations and flow rate are to be verified by plat
sponsor and provide verification to the Department of Building and Safety prtor to finaltzation
of this plat.
N3U
Fire flow hydrant requirements for this plat are 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes.
Hydrants are to be spaced no further than 900 feet and such that structures fall w7thin a 450'
radius of said hydrants. Plat sponsor to verify specific hydrant requirements with Fire
Dtstri ct . The plat dedication shall state: "required hydrants shall be installed prior
to the issuance of any building permits or sale of any lots."
# 31
The location of the existing is to be provided to the Department of Building and
Safety for verification of the requi rements for fire resistive construction. The structure(s)
shall be Drought into compliance with said requirements. Permlt(s) and inspection(s) are
requtred for verification prior to finalizatton of this plat.
COMME NTS : `~TkN 5 0-bND l-f"cON T(AOSZT
~TS L) c S 1 Cs tOAZSYD V~'P, 7) c.c-PcC Y-* s 1^1 HE: Q. i~=,
A LOT S i t-?-.> e Zc,--) ec_- N
t..l 1~ IITS
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ ~ . ~
~ I ~
~ ~ ' ' ~ , ~ ~
, ~
~ ~ ~ ~ . !
~ . ~ ~
~ N
~ ~ ~
~ • i
' ~ ` ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~ ~ , ~ ` ; ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
, , . , Q ` I ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
V' I
~ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ ,
~ i ~ r ;
I , ~
, i ~ I ~ ,
~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I .
' ~ I ~ ,
~ ~ ~ ~ , , ~ D 1 , ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - i .
~I I O I ' I ~ , ` \
I ' ~ ' ~ I
• . ~ ! 1 I ~ ; ` ' ~
~ ~ j I
. ~ ' `
I I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~
~ ~ 1
, \ ' ~ ~ ~ ' I . ~
~ ~ a ~ ~ , ~
. ~ , 3 . ~
, ~ i ~
~ 1 ~ 3
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~1 ~ ~ ' t
~ ~ I I I I * ~ ~
~ I I I \ ' Q ~ ± ~
, ~ ~ 4 ~ ; ~ ~ ;
I i i ! ` ~ ~ ~ I .
; , ~ ~ ~ I I t!
,
~ ` ,
~ ~ N o ~e ~ ►
. • , ,3 ~ ~
~ o .
~ ~ ' ' ► `
~ ~ . ~ .
~
t\K
~ ~ ~ ~
i
. ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ , . -
, ~
, o ; , • ~
I , i ~ I I ~ c ~ i I I
~
C~ -
r
~.A'1' ~ ' / •
e--t t,$
~
/ •
. L
4; ~Pz_~ ~
. ~ t
~ -
~2L
~ . ~
~ A J.r,~~ ♦
~
~ •
.
~
2',~,~t~/
,e 4~
~
~
~
~
~
~ Li E C E I
` A
V E
` APR 17 m85
SFOKANE CUUIU ir
M I D I L 0 M E, I N C. PLANNING DEPqRrMENT
,
W. 606 Third Avenue
Spokane, Washington
99204-1486
April 15, 1985
,
' > r 1
n
Dea r Resident:
As I am sure you are aware, Midilome, Inc., recently proposed a plan to
the County aski ng for dupl exes facino Pi nes Road. Last Wednesday,
Apri 1 10, 1985, Midi loine, Inc., held an open forum to give a11 the re-
sidents of Midi lome a chance to express their feel ings about the proposed
change.
The P-1idilorne developers provided this opportunity because kqe do respect
the residents of this neignborhoocf. We felt our proposed plan would not
be derogatory f.o the area. The exchange at the meeting WFdnesday clear-
ly deononstrated that the residents of P9idilome do not share this feeling.
In response to your clear desires on this i»atter, Midiloi»e, Inc., formally
notif i es you, by iileans of thi s 1 etter, that we have wi tharawn from the
hearing and vrill proceed no further with this proposed change.
Again, we app►-eciate your input, and while this is an expensive decision
_Tor us, it is a decision we gladly make.
~ -Siricer ly yours,
M ; LO-~1E4dC.i^
,
Rlobert N. Tomlinson
ftHT:mb
,
P M~ . .
t
TOMLINSON AGENCY, CITY, INC.
REALTORS / West 606 Third Ave / Spokane, WA 99204
~ Spo ka ne Cou n ty
W. 1116 Jefferson
jTOMSpokane, w'ashington 99201
's ~ 5 1
~ ~
.
STATEINIENT
TO : Hearing Examiner Committee April 18, 1985
Spokane County
Re£erence : Change of Condi tions, Midlome 4th Addi tion-
Change of 24 Lots to R-2 Zoning.
Our names are Jean A. and Gerald D. Marsh. W e live at East 12108
34th Avenue where we have invested more than $100,000 fn our new home.
Our residence is near the area proposed by the developer to be rezoned
from R-1 to R-2.
Prior to construction, we were required to obtain architectural
committee approval of our house plans. We were also required to sign
developer prepared covenants...all designed to quote maintain quality
of workmanship and harmony of external desi;n with existing structures,
4nquote. Among other things, the agreed to covenants provided for not
more than one detached single family dwellinb gt a cost of not less
than $50,000, exclusive of lot. The developer furnished us wfth two
trees to continue the aesthetic values throughout the neighborhood.
We believed that obtaining approvals of plans, and the signing of
covenants, protected US as much as the developer. pur one-story house
far exceeds the minimum requirements...as do the other homes in the
neighborhood.
The vexy individuals requiring us to meet those high quality
standards to build, are now proposing to reclassify 24 lots in the
ziidlome area from R-1 to R-2 zoning. Such a change would allow the
construction of duplex apartments near our home.
The construction of duplexes in the area would:
1. greatly decrease the resale value of our property.
2. greatly increase vehicular and foot traffic in the area. The
resultant noise factor coould adversely affect the tranquil atmosphere
of the now single family dwellinb neighborhood.
3. r:iake Pines Road, south of 32nd, amajor arterial. Now, that
street is used mostly for school traffic. Many school children walk ro
school on this road. Autorrobil.e traffic bac6ring out frcr; Duple.,
Driveways on to Pines Road would be a danger to school chi 1dren attending
Chester Llemc:ntary and Horizon Junior High School.
4. require an environmental impact statement...the increased
population resulting from duplex apartments,versus single faaiily homes,
c3ould require expansion of utility systems...fire and police protection...
and would send more children to schools in the area.
I .ie respECtfully submit that a change from :t-i to il-2 zoning in the
:lidlome 4th addition, as requested, caould not be in the best interests
of the Midlome eommunity.
►Je ask that the petition to rezone be denied.
Jean A. Marsh /jerald D. imlar h
,
T0: Heari ng E;: ami ner Commi ttee ~
FFtQM: Mary M. -rarrq E. 11910 33rd, SpoE;aneq Wa 992106 ~
SUEsJECTe adverse envi ronmentaI i mpact of propased --oni ng
change i n the Mi dal ome 4th add i t i on
DAiE: Apri-l 15, 19e5
I waul d I i k,e to wri te to pr'otest the propoSaI to recl assi fy 24
lots of the Midalome 4th addition from Fi--1 to Ft-2 z-oning. I woLild
have gladly come to testify in person e::cept that a prior-
pr-of essi onal commi tment requi res that I be i n Seattl e thi s week.
I-iowever. I~.~m aSsured that in my absence someone wiZl read the
substance of this 1 etter whi ch contai ns bLit a part i al. I i st of my
concerns and 1ii: el y probl ems whi ch woul d resul t from such an
acti on.
1) If 48 dupl e:; unz ts t-jere bui 1 d on the west si de of Pz nes, as
prcapased, Bob Toml i son has stated that there i s no doubt that a
match i ng nLtmber- of uni ts woul d be bui 1 t on the East side vf
r-'~i nes. Thi s WoLt1 d mean that there woul d be about 96 Ltnits on that
secti on of F'i nes, 1 i mi ted onl y by the fact that there i s leSs
space to bui 1 d on the East si de because of the school bui 1 dl ngse
This i s the reat and mx ni mum e::tent of the proposa1 i n qLtest1 an .
These dLtpl e.; e5, i f bui 1 t q woul d be adjacent to Chester
EI ementary and Hor-i zon Juni or Hi gh School s a Such housi ng woul d
concentrate twice as many people, petsq carsq recreatianGzl
vehi cl es and I.i ter- on thi s strl p of 3 and than woul d be present i. f
sz ngl e fami 1 y dwel1 i ngs were bui 1 t there are i s now prescri bed by
the zoning ciassxfication. Thzs would not provide a"buffer" as
has been suggested. Instead it would congest an area which
should ideally have limited traffic and congPStion. In factq a
park across f orm the school s woul d be mare i r: order i f a buf f er
is tru1y necessary.
31? The two schools mentioned abave are aIready near capacxty.
F11 1 owi ng the R-2 : oni ng woul d doubI e the potenti ai number- of
children which might attend these schools from this particular
area of 1 and . Dvercroa:di ng the scnool s z s not i n the best
xntere5t of the children aIready in attendance, let alone the
ch i 1 dren WF1A have yet to enrol 1.
4) Qnce Midalome 4th addition is rezoned as R-29 it seems that
lt would be easi er to recl assi fy addi ti onal 1 OL5 withx n the
Mi dal ome 4th add i tinn to the same statu«. i f th i s were
accomplished such units would most lii-ely tae LLtilt right up to
the e;: isti ng housi riq which VJoLil d put the val ue of those homes,
I
and perhaps others in the areaq in jeapardy. Although this mighL
be f i nanci a1 1 y advantageous to Tomli nson and the Bueshkes, i t is
not i n the i nterest of the pr-esent homeowners i n Mi dal omeo
5} The sewer system whi ch i s aI ready i n pI ace is desi gned for R-
1 housi ng . R-^ hau-i ng has the poten-k i al f or overtax1i ng the
capaci ty of this system,
c,) The Stateq by its court deci si ons, have d3 scouraged spot
: oning. This type af Zoning disturbs the tenor af the
neighborhoado
7) Although the dupie;es are proposed as "owner occupiedq" there
° is no law that would ensur-e that this would be true.
8? If owners did not accupy at Ieast one-half of the units, the
resi dents waul cl tend to be f ar mare transi Pnt than home owner5.
Tnis wouId have a destabilizing effect on the neiqhborhvods. I
have lived in such an area previously, and thisq in fact, does
occur and does have an adverse imQact an the neighborhood.
9) Although I have not done a scientific study, Iwould say from
observat i on and f rom tal E; i ng wi th those whQ own dupl e}: es f or
rental income, that duple:;es are not beinq well-received in the
r-eal estate mar-Eiet. A fair number of duplexes are now either for
a sa? e or rent i n the Spokane VaI I ey. It does not seem that mor-e
need to be added ta thxs already too plentiful pvol. However, on
the other hand, houses of $85, 000. and abave do seem to bn mavi ng
i n the marf;et. It seems that i t woLtl d be wi ser to cantinue to
bulld hoLIses x ri this cc--A1 a ber i f rapidsa1 e is of concern A
10) Fi nal 1 y, Toml i nson has stated that sel I i ng the 1and in
qLiesti an for dupl exes woul d net Mi dal ome Tnc A appro;: i matel y
$100,000.00 in additzanal revenue. Likewa.se, he stated that
sel 1 i nq the 1 ots f or si ng 1 e fami I y dwel l i ngs woul d not net thP
company much prvf i t, but aioul d probabl y not const i tute a 1 oss.
"fherefar-e, the reaI questi on i s one of enva. ronmentaI qual i ty and
economic protection for the many, againsc t'tte economic gains of
the few. Whatever the consi derati ans, thi s does not seem , Ltst.
The above would have a definite SiGNIFICAhlT IMPACT on the
nei ghborhood . FLirthermore, there i s the matter Qf 1aw and of
covenants governxng th-e Midalome addition. There are severat
consi derati ons i n this regard:
1) The St ate requlres that zoni ng changes be i n the best
inter-est of the area i n questz on. Thi si5 c1 earl y not the casea
The neighborhoad would be more congestedt mor-e transientq over
ta: ed and theref ore a 1 ess desi rabi e pl ace to resi de.
- m~, d ham
•e
as,~d b anared' t~'~ ~ks h
v~ g~~r~h L~l d~~ as ~`'~r ~n ~any mo meS
who ants v~'° Mi03-ma 1 enr~'s' ~ S° Eade d"
eaP~ ~ cfl'~en tbe ~'~~1 d
The g t~+~ vsi~~' mil'~ h~,v~' oyer1Y ts were
.~h~'~ hoQ~ le f a~ ~►nd me vena~' e
tb nv ~ ng n~,~ ~bt~ar O~l,~ ~~.n~ + a~- v~, b,~cra ~Q e~ ~h~n~3
tb~ ~ Qmmoci ~.teaads : Q~'~ bar~,aod~~ ~ ~i ~b1'~' th.~ ~ p~' o~~°~ co~tl d and
,~o,.kl a ~ ~;~i ~hb~~ ~.h~' n~h~ a 1 es eeme~'t ° ne i ~~'b °''b ao
1 b~'Ga0 ~ as
a ~ ~ i te~. ed ~ o f the eG~ that „':e 4 bef °4~ e i n
~ai SY ~e~~e ~ par ~e 5~.t s R f 1 Y '~ed
~ar~ -tn~ ab~,e
2s~ ~,ali t'~ -R ~ ~ s3,
be wei 9 f ~i ~~,1~~' a ~,d th~. ~
a irn~~
~ ~ese P°ihOmeowner" attr ~~t ~ ~m2 t t~ a~, v t+~
~ at ~ Th~' , ~ ~,ad tne P Is car a+~Me~"
~Lk9gest l~ ~a-bed ne~ g b~~~~a t~. on t ~a o~'9~;''k ~ ghbOf.b pod
; ,~ir~n ,~a eeP `~ght h AnY eP ared k~- ne
~~e desir e ~'~b b~O4~eP~ ~-IyJe are ~Q~..~~.~ V"e
a~ i~,
~G~ to d W~,~~l d ~~~sted • t, v~e tb
p ~ "~as anwi ~ ~ ~ p ~`ri shar+~er ~'t= on h~ '~3'
acGept d co~d~f
~~h,~ ~ g ~-h1 w gr
Q~~!p a
~
th i,~ . ~t a a~ at ~ ~ ~.~n 1
e-~ t ~ YoLtr c°~~P I ~r 4,-tst avof
y°u` { ~~~~~t i~ ~nds r~xle
Tha~„~ r4.
t~
tr eme.~ ar, gt-km~
~eSe
h~ ,~m~~~~,~,~ ~ .
R
f
Christopher K. Lee
Agnes M. Lee
E 12016 33RD Avenue
Spokane, v1A. 99206
April 17, 1985
County Planning Staff
Spokane County, WA.
Gentlemen:
My name is Christopher K. Lee and is currently residing with
my wife Agnes M. Lee on E 12016 33RD Avenue in the Midilome
second Addition of Spokane County.
6]e were informed of an application to re-zone an existing
R-1 zone to R-2 zone on the west side of Pine Street in the
Midilome 3RD Addition. We would like to register our formal
opposition of this re-zoning.
The R-2 zone would increase the population density of the
Subdivision and create financial hardship to the already
burden School District. As you may already know, Horizon
Junior High School is within walking distance of Midilome
Subdivision and parents would hate to see their children bus
to other School District because of overcrowding.
We feel that the re-zoning is strictly for economic reasons
and only benefit the applicants who want a quick sale.
Therefore, until the applicants can prove otherwise, we will
continue our support to "M.A.D" (Midilome against Duplexes)
and oppose to the re-zoning of said property.
Sincerely
Chri op er K. Lee
Agnes M. Lee
April 18, 1985
I3earing Examiner Committee
Broadway Centre Building
2nd Floor, Public Ilearing Room
Spokane, Washington 99260
To the Hearing Examiner Committee:
Re: Midilome 4th Addition Zone Change
We could not attend the meeting today, but it does not
lessen our concern over this proposal of spot zoning change.
It is stated that a buffer zone is needed along Pines Rd.
We question if that is really a valid reason to build duplexes
and change the area's zoning. The 1983 Homeshow homes were
built along 32nd Ave. just one block west of Pines Rd. Thirty-
second Ave. is at least three times busier than Pines Rd., and
the only buffer these homes have is a six foot wooden fence.
These homes sold for over $100,000 each and they have all been
occupibd since they were built. There are homes along Bowdish
Rd. which is, again, much busier than Pines Rd. and no buffer
zone was n,eeded.
The existence of duplexes on Pines Rd. would greatly increase
traffic hazards for the students walking to and from the ele-
mentary and junior high schools located across the street.
Rezoning would create an opportunity for commercial develop-
ment, such as convenience type stores. This would only serve
as an unsafe place for the kids from the school$ to hang out.
The increase in population, due to the duplexes, would
call for an increased need for law enforcement, and over-
crowd the schools causing our children to be bused to another
school. Because of the increased cars in a smaller area than
single family housing, we feel there will be a negative
enviornmental impact.
Before we purbhased our home, we were assured that the area
was R-1 and would remain A-1. F7e do not see how this spot
zoning is beneficial to the area homeowners. We chose to live
in this area because we felt the developer's pride and ideas in
creating a housing development with tree lined streets, decora-
tive lighting, and an above average home market range, was to our
ideal. But it now appears they have changed their concept by
building low cost structures for investment minded peopl.e, that
can be turned quicklyi for a fast buck.
P, spot zoning change should be for the benefit of thelocal
residences. Keepihg this in mind, we feel that a simple fence
or a much needed park would benefit the entire community and eli-
minate the need for a buffer zone.
This is a very serious problem to all of us. We hope that
you will take a hard look at the inconsistencies and additional
problems that rezoning would create.
Sincerely:
Scott and Loretta Reynolds
'AAA
APRIL 179 1985
~
TO MEMBERS OF THE HEARING EXAMiNER COMMITTEE:
We are unable to attend the April 18th hearing but would
like our thoughts heard through this letter.
, My family is very concerned over the proposal to change
Midilome Fourth Addition lots to R-2 zoning status. We chose
to build our home in Midilome because it offered a neighborhood
of quality single family homes and its R-1 zoning promised to
ensure future quality.
I view the building of duplexes as a detriment to Property
values and the quality of life already established in Midilome.
I have doubts as to whether the duplexes would end up as occupant-
,owned single family attached structures. There is nothing to
stop them from becoming rental properties.
It seems to me that the developers are out to sell lots at
all cost only, and not to continue to develop the quality sub-
division they have started.
Would the principals of Midilome, Inc. choose to build their
homes in the middle of a duplex development?
Sincerely,
MARSHALL A. KOVAL & FAMILY
w
~ • .
T-ionorable County Commissior_ers :
IwoL 1d like tc c omment on the nropos al to cl as s ify 24
lots of Midilome l[th addition as R-2. I think there
are sorne very si ;nificar..t factors that nePd to be con-
s7 dered . 3necif ically : the legality and desir3bility of
sn.ot zonin the effect on pronertv values of homes in
the '`-idilome adc.it ion ; the dramatic i.ncr•ease in tr•aff ic
on a road currently used b,y children walking to and from
school; the immediate increase in students at achools
already nearin; maximum cap3city; the eI'fect of increased
demand on the sewer system; and finally the establishment
ef a precedent that could unfortunately leac3 to further
r•e zaninU of the 4 t'n addi t ion .
I understand there is 3 state law that restricts spot
zonina. Also, is snot zoning desirRble. From urivino
arovnd the valle,v, '1" have noticed an inconsistent pat-
tern cf nlannino and developmFnt. Idon 'tkraow what d-a-
ci.2rycr.r ;a~~~°e 4 --r.i.de *_n the past, 'dut in the furture
shouldn't the va11ey have a n1 -q.nned development and not
be sub,;ect to the w'nims of developers wishing to make
a quick nr.ofit.
j1~Th3t will be the effect on property values of hon.es in
Midilome? trJhen I bou~ht cne of the 1783 home show homes,
I t,aas as pured b,y To.mlinson 1`,ency representatives that
Midilome j,aould streidtly be R-1 single-dwellinCD y homes.
Thi5 was one of thP main reasons I, as well is o t'ners,
bought homes here. Now, Tomlinson, in con;;unction with
Mr. Mrs. ~3ueshke, wants to rene- on that promise.
T-T-istoriciqlly, pronerty values are detri-mentqlly affected
wher_ diaplexES are built close by. Don't let this happen.
Dontt let the interests of the many be adversely afiected
hST the interpsts cf the few.
?znes road south of 32na is not now a 'ous,y street. It leads tc two schools and the 'Oainted Hills subd:i.vision.
However, aad 48 families, say an iveraue of 2 car s each
and traffic has dramatically increased. This is a street
used b.y child.ren walkin~ to 3nd fro:~ school.
Chester school is curreratly nearin,; c3pa.city, especially
ir_ the lower three ;rades . If 2l~. duplexes are built aler~~
Pines Road., there wa.ll be in immedictte influx of stuciznts.
mhe ~ri~dual de~9plopment of sin~le c?wellin~ '~omes will al-
low the school districts tirne to plan. The immedi.3te in-
f1tix o{' 46 families will not.
Finallv, the snot rezonirl~ is establishin~ a~z undesirable
nrecedant. Tomlinson wants the lots rezoned bec.ause they
feei the lats can be sold quicker caith a ;reater. maroin
of profit. What hapoens ir the future if other lots can' t
b- sold because they bcarder cn duplexes. Obviousl;~, more
dunlexes will be the 9nswer. '~lso, once nart of an area
i
• r
0
ii
1
is .~•E?ZCi'»~'t, 1~: ls ~'a~c"1~'x' to '~aJt~ f's,'t~1eY' =''zoT?? ~1-~'7,, 1. E?
~y S y-~y~
•I1~.t.' e 'U. Lt 2. e, t1 .'G. s } U ;'w : L' ~~r [Z0L1 r co vf"+ L iei l 2r v 'st s ~i' tL' •
"F-leqRe 6ons-ir1er a11 the fsr;to•rs ~~~."br: de_c4dinj, :r'hlether ar
no tta ra-.zo~ie 21i. 3c t',s . C=.ans ::.~er :tlie lor?-, t,--.r7.n. amnurt3ns:::
ws 'ade,.l FAs Lhe dP9i1'.s Gf ''x _!'er) 7_acip1 E tQ r1]akP ::4 qL,f1.Ck
p?" of 7. t .
Sin,cerclfi,
D-a1.1is ana Jclma1 Cale
11905 33rd Avp
' Snok3ns, WA 992o6
.
~
f
~1ti ~~-~.~~v ~n
I
~ ~
C~ ~ ~C3 ~S ',,~NiO G-~i /0-~ E'
E/u el ~/1'I~ ~ • ~i'~~ i'~ ~
.
P C) -f IXe
t'- / 2 o,,✓d~6=~
,
d c
~st1v/i e
~X-xt~
~
1 E's Gc> i ez
~
~ ~
~
~ 4,e,(,Je ~
~
e!l) '1 "C~ A r~5
k~
Lj~ ~7CAi5 06ttt-u
~
r
~ - - -
~
~
~ L~ c~ d ~ C~k5 el(M 5 C--
-s-xi NLu ~ ~ -W 011-e4.5 lell
- 4ra- ~
~
~
-(~r av--41-- _ -a `(A
-e-,k)
~
~
~ -
~
.
We-, J6 _ A-) -&,t le /-,f
bo,~,,s C~ 's ,~r V-- -60 7"~~
. A 0-1 s e ,~~0 v-e d .sC. ~ Z~ a -
~ -
~-WP) %'i- A)
~
~
7
~
r
February 19, 1985
Spokane Zoning Board:
Although we cannot be at the Thursday meeting, we want to go on record
by way of this letter that we are strongly opposed to the re-zoning
of the Midelome 4th Addition to allow for the building of duplex units.
We moved to Spokane a little over a year ago and only last August bought
the home located at E. 11519-34th. When we were looking and shopping
for a home of our oi,m, one of the appealing factors about this location
was that the homes were fairly new, single dwelling units caith nicel_y
spaced yards.
Also a consideration was the fact that most of the people living in these
homes are the owners - for the most part they are not rented out, so the
upkeep of yards, homes, etc. is considerably better than what is often
f_ound in an area where there are rentals.
We would strongly urge you to not allow a re-zoning for multiple luving
unit buildings to be built.
Sincerely,
~
✓ i,~.A.t~cA" e r.~L~J
Ray &`Marge Millard
E. 11519 - 34th
Spolcane, [tiTA 99206
1
~
PET'ITION I1T 4PF{}SITION TQ
FROPC}SID Z0N714G CHP.NGE
WITHIN TCDILdNiE 4th ADDITION
T'he tndersig~ed object ta the proposal ta charlge the zoning c~f
the Midilorre 4th Addition from E1 to R2.
NAME ADDRESS TELLPH0NE
-2- 9~
~ - ~
~q
-37
.
filoq 3~
s -
3-4q22a 7_336
11"?f9 r'.3 :W~ ~~RLI
~a) c
aLzYQ- ~ ro 3-3 92- 7-6 3 6
~ Y Z~
~ +
gzg
~ 0
rox
"AS ~ . 3
qlo ~ ~ ~
0
r '
~~~.l~'..~ ~`!r9-~.~''L~`' ~ . ~c8-~'.c.) ~ ~
61"
~ ~ OPPoSIT0
P£~YZ~Q Sll) ZON~G Cl-iPdGE
~OPO 4th ADDlTZ0N
WYvIli MjDI.~~
e ~e zon"-nF' of
S~ to ~an~.
d ob~e~~ t° t ~e a-~2 ,
1~,e t
e ~ders o~ ~r°~
~e ~~3ome 4th
~,~pr0~1E
ADOESS
AG
9
17
7I
41117
. . r
1(/7/// f 9
39 9.
oll
70
_
_ AL,~
37S
• ~1io
~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
-Jj'~'~
4L,~ ,7~
7,7
S
:
. ~
~ pPPOSIT~o-14 T0
~
P~T~'~IaN
- S~D ~0N ~G CBMC 0I4
FR~~ 4.~, pDT)IT~
WI'~~ ~DI
ar~ge ~e Z°n1n~ of
~e Pr°P°s~ to
ed ob3eCt t~ o g2.
~l ~
d~tlon f rof", Rl
The unde~ t
the jAicjj1oTw- ~th A
P,rDP,EsS r,,. • ~ ~ `-t d
~20
3-7 - - 9~~
~
,o qz
~
.3~-- ~ ~ j~ ~ ____r i
YS
17
~
~ .
~ ~ f- ~
^
3J;
'3
'"L~~
1;4
~ ~
• ,R ~d
< ~J - y
.._.r- ,
TION I~ ~PF4ST~I4N T~
P£'~~
I-NZONG CHP~GE
PRO~S~ 4th ADDITIDN
WI'I`Kv 1AIDYI-DIJF-
Zoniri~ of
the p~P°Sal to b~ge
~e ~ar,de~.^s i~'ed o~~ eCt tO to g2 .
~.ome Uth Add~-tl°n fT'°r~
-tY,e I'~-'
ADDRESS ,
~j°- ~ • ' ~ `
• ,/~1 .t,,~ (S~
~ f ~1'1.!`-
-lDgY
~3 c)~-~
~ .
L) ~
LO
3 ~
~ 3.0
4,U q Q
3 IeO~
, ` ~
° 1~,- r • ~ ~ u j
~
~ .
~U..~ ~ ✓ - `-~1 c~-~' ~ 7 ~ p. - y ~ ~~j~
Cf Le--
~~qtYi
h
~
~
:3-3)
~ opPOS~~10~ TO
P~ITI~~ ~
S~ Za~'I~G OI~
4th ~DI~I
MI~U
e ~.e
xoP°s~" t° ,~an~
ed ob7ect t`~ ~'e p ~2 •
'I'11 to
e
~e or~
TzillpliGtlz
ADDP,Lss _y f 70 ,
- , ci
_
pqq_
~ ~ ~ ~ i r; 7,, e~~~ • .~t
S 3
• ~ . ~ t1r "s.~ r
d • 7 ' j ~
L41
ti
P
~
_l 1-1
°p
r%~ ~ -
~ - -T2 c~ ~T }
~
, .
TI4N v OPPoS~~O'N T4
PE'~I sM Z~~~G CHANC-~
4th ADD~TI0N
~~'DI
zanin~, ~f
he P~~s~ .~o ~an~e
object tc' t ~2.
~e ~ders ~d~tipn ~.x°m ga, to
t-1e rLid~-~°me 4th
~L,EPH~I']E
A~D,T,SS
~ C-~~.
~
e
- ~47
d/~
r~ ~ 1 /Cl ~
ar = ~ ~y ~ , J v
`
3
- 1 1 a ~ qa. ~ ~
~
. ~ 33'`
~
1 11
- - 33 q2b
~
Gl
~ .
.
~
~
11 4,a 0
' 1 ~ -
PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO
PROPOSID ZONNi G GEiANGE
WITHIN MIDILOME 4th ADDITION
The undersigned object to the proposal to change the zoning of
the Midilome 4th Addition from Rl to R2.
NAI,E ADDRESS TELEPHONE
~ L-7z,7~~~~r 3
3`/029
~ ~ . ~ ~ _ r.~ ~s
Q ~ ~.c~~•~ . U~ ~ ~ 1 ~~c~~ C gr 7~ ~
W-i Ouu-p 7~a ~
~ . , .
(.c o
ZZ-~ 5-(~
~ l 1I Z 7- '3 -l q z 2--(45I ~
, -
.
~ ' ' ~ r'~ ~ ~v~.~s~..~ i ( ~ ~ U C . ~ ~ ~ 0i !
S9~2
~ ~ oJ ~ C~ • ~ c/f ~ 3 ~ ~
~ ^ r • , . !
~
V);\ ( e S ~ZL
~
i
PE'I'ITION IN OPPOSITION TO
PROPOSED ZONING CHl1NGE
WITHIN MIDILOME 4th ADDITION
The undersigned object to the proposal to change the zoning of
the Midilome 4th Addition from R1 to R2.
MA~E ADDRESS TELEPHONE
/A
~ t~~ ~ ol Y
Kell
, ' f G , ~ ~ ~ , ~
xJi/
l.~r ~ / ~G~1 _ ~ .r• ~
. . . n .
S~ S-b
~ -e
3~ O5"
0,2ru Feuzle~ 3&0-7 Fox eoad 9z~ - ~50 ~
E
,Q • C . 1170 9 ~ 7 A)ve 700 3
70
4 ,34A
~ Ll~ -
► - - - -
S . -3(pI°7 a L4 - 5 118q
va --733,6
0 ~'ll ~o~
~ - ' I
C
~
~
PETITION IN OPPaSITIOiV TO
PROPOSID ZONING CHANGE
WITHIN MIDILOME 4th ADDITION
The undersigzed object to the proposal to change the zoning of
the Midilome 4th Addition from R1 to R2.
ADDRESS 'I'ELEPHONE
~ ~ 3417
M8 97 Z(
✓
~
C10-7- vPG
- ~ - - - - ~ ~ ' .
3C;2 t g27 cpu~2
~
~ 330~
N- ~ Y~ZZ
09 IIJ 1 l b t,r cw -48aa
~ ~24e -6 3?0
, 5<.,14 -3 ~ i
~
/ . ~
~ -
C, I eo 33 o 5- 7 ~
~V 0 6
. ~
v ~
~
~
~ O~~O~ITIflN TO
P.~I'TXQI~
-E
SED ZON~G ~ ~~G
pI3
4th DITI
WI'I'x-~ I~tI~3I
Zonln, of
P°sa3" t° cY'an~e
ob3ect to the Px,~, g2.
to
4th ~n
1 ,DD~jSS ! • ~
• j „ ~ Y` ~!~`.1~.~~~1
j . -
~ • _ ~~z....la
3 v ~
r'7/
(+z//
O~ W M
y- I•i~O/ ~~~A~ - qa6 -
~
.3~~-
aw, ~ ~ 31 IZ
x 3S-
~ -
Z ,
z - 35; 1
~ ~ • ` ~ ~ ' V
G' qa
- j.70 / ~ E
57,
a--1
~
~
~
s
~
o~ V aPPOSZTIO~ To
ITI
~ S~ ZoN -T~► ~ cHo~
~0~ 4~ ~DITION
~D~
ange ~'1e z°nin~ °f
The o ~e Pz'°p°sal- to c~'
~dersi~'ed °b~e~t ~ ta R2.
o~ 4.~ p,ddit14n ~rOm
.~e Ma.d. ~.l
~~PH4NE
ADDF,ESS .
13,~
3 ~ q4 .
.
, , .
~
f+ ~ _,y~•
~ ` Y " d~g ~ ,fZ 4 (i ~.~C~ f ~y j r GC'
J'
-4
3 '=N 'q {~J
~
n ~ ~ \ 'I ~
~ , . ~ ~ . y
`17>
p p .
cs
, ~ ~ ~;f f•~~ /,~w/~` /~e(~
Jev
~
~
.
,
~
i!' ~r
~ < ~ ' ~ ✓f ' e
1~ , • ~ - ~ t /
o1j q
' 4
` `J~ a ,~.~f'•-~ ~ ' - ~ } Z; C4
~ lf „ ^ 1 a, ,
k
~ ~ i ~ t
PETITION IN OPPOSITIOV TO
PROPOSID ZONING CHANGE
WITHIN MIDILOME 4th ADDITION
I
The undersigned object to the proposal to change the zoning of
the Midilor.~e 4th Addition from Rl to R2.
NAI`IE ADDRESS TELEPIi0P1E
- _ ,I& .z~ A1 sn,.e -/"J~
700
~
v
~ . -
c~•P.f,i ~ . ~ _~~~~~.t~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
l
3 4i a B.4t s Cf 9 2, 0 c~ 92 V---710
I t "
~
3 SZZ ~a~-~S - ~ . ~5 Zo~• iZ~•i~3
,
w►.~~ 5 ~ Y 07S41 e, I i X-~
- ✓ ~ ` _
-2
fjj.
~2-0 97 ~ ✓ 9 a 2- 2-327
~ OPP~SITION TO
p~ITI~~
GE
.pOSUD Z(JN~G pN
DI.~~ 4tY~ ~DITI
U~~ ~
e .~e zon3n~
e p~~°S~ to cY'an€~
to
~dersl~'ed °~~e~t .~o R2.
~e uth Ad~-ti°~ f T'°m
tre 14idl'10Tf~'- '
~~,,EPH~~TE
PDDESS -7
~
,J~~'
11,9
e 1 ► -55a
303 M
j;,3
1-17
--7 ~ 17
C 2 qo7 gates
- 00.
, /b 2rl~ 2 q 6-7~ .
iD
~2
?gx -,.3y~-;
a ~
,g•~~~-
_
, . • ~ ~z~~u _
. ''c'
.
~
D.
- _ Li
/I~ ~
~
PETITION IN OPPOSITIOV TO
FROFOSID ZONING CHANGE
WITHIN MIIDIIAME 4th ADDITION
The tndersi8ned object to the proposal to change the zoning of
the Midilome 4th Addition from Rl to R2.
NAME ADDR:SS 'I'ELEPHONE
~
, ~z~c.~ ~ ~ `~o Q~GC~ •Y Y ~ 3
~O Lk n OA,/
, . ,
~
C-/Qc/ K
-7- - 3
7,0
~
Pr-, .
, . ~ . ~
5
. ~ / /xo y
, X _ 1 c~~~N-~/1 > I J 9'- ~~5
~
~
~ Op~oSI~IQ~ T~
ON
P~~-TI 7,ONVC ~~IANGE
T~R~~SFD 4t-b AD-~I~~ON
,~e
o~
roP~'S~ .~o ~,ar~~e
d ~b7eC t to -the P -R2 +
'I~e ,,~'clers1'~1e 4.~ ~d~-~1on to
the
r2 ~
~
~ r ~ 4.7~
~ SV7
~ ~,..1..~.~.~ ► ~41c
IQQ~,'...--
I ec
le 2 0 L,
. ~P, `N
UA 4h
?-(P
~.1 ~ -Z _ 0-5- ~
c-
~
J~ ~ • . ~
3 Lt t q _ j141
,
~ - ~ -
S . 3
.r-t~"
=ITIQ,N ~PPOSTrl"10N TO
P`ROPOSED ZONT.NG CHMG.E
WITHIN MIDILONE 4th ADDI'I'IflN
The undersigned object to the iProposal ta chaTige the zoning of
the Midilome 4th Add.itiari from R1 to R2,
NAME .~DRESs ~LF-PhoNTE
~
- . - ~ t ~ ~
~ ~ 3-i
a ir-7 -
r ~ L
.2 C) ,3
Z
~
~
947es
~
C
tl-
~faq~ ~7/~~y
f ~ ~f _
d ~
•
,
~ /-!F 7
~ ~ ~ ; ~ " F~~~
3L,15-3 3 - C, ~
6_
0 5
r
ra 4.. _ -j 801 i~ ld P_-J •!4~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~
1 ~ ~ ~ ~
- _ . s~
f3aw) 2-
~
~s aPPOs- - -Ta
~ITS.41~
S~D Z~N~G ~C~
~ ON
4t.'r, p~7~ITI
e ~e Zon~,~ of
roP°S~ to ~,an'~
edob3ect iotOn ~e P to R2.
''he ,~t
~~lo~ 4~ p,d
~e
- ,~~gHOI~
.
, pDDRCSS
~
~
Z,3
- . ~ • ~ „ ~ L
}
~-97
t-7
~
~
L--~
e ~ p. ea
&7 -
, . A . as
J~~
~
l
9,Ci
~.,co
r_ OF
-r
PEI'ITION IN OPPOSITION TO
PROPOSED ZONING C-iANGE
WITHIN MIDILOME 4th ADDITION
'Ihe undersigzed obj ect ta the proposal to cYiange the zoning of
the Miclilome 4th Addition from R1 to R2.
NANE ADDRESS '1'ELEpHOHE
z , &alt~
6d
C` .
r o o T'' 03 5
p.j s Qi0 .3 7 S a,~~ ~ 9
PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO
PROPOSID ZONN G QHANGE
WITHIN MIDILOME 4th ADDITION
The undersigned object to the proposal to change the zoning of
the Midilowe 4th Addition from Rl to R2.
NAME ADDRESS TELEPHONE
V
0
TOM"NSON AGENCY, INC. REALT( 'I '
~ West 606 i hird Avenue • Spokane, WA 99204 o (509) 624-9131 \
~
E C E I V E
APR 181985
SPOKANE COUN fY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
April 16, 1985
Doug Adams
Pl at Admini strator
Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear poug:
Attached is a copy of a letter we are sending to the
resi dents of Mi di lome that noti fi es them we have wi thdrawn
our application fbr a zone change.
Sinc ly)
~be
✓ Ro rt H. Tomlinson
RHT:mb
Enc.
f
,
TJU~t4 ~
Office Locations SPOKANE • SPOKANE VALLEY • CLARKSTON • LEWISTON, IDAHO ~
~
.
M I D 1 L 0 iYl E, IN C.
W. 606 Third Averue
Spokane, Washington
99204-].486
April 15, 1985
Dea r Res i dent:
As I am su►-e you are ativare, ".1idi?orne, Inc., recently proposed a plati to
the County ask7 iig for dupl exes facing Pi nes Road. Last Wecsnesday,
April 10, 1985, f7idilome, Inc., held an open forurii to give all the re-
sidents of hl idi 10i»e a chance to express thei r Fee1 i ngs about the propos2d
change.
The Midilome developers provided this npportunity because tve do respect
the residents of thi s neighborhood. tqe fel t our proposed plan would not
be derogatory to the area. The exchange at the meeting ifJednesday clear-
1 y demonstrated tiia t the res i dents of P1i d i 1 ai1ie do not s{lare thi s feel i ng .
In response to your clear desires on this mattcr, Midiiome, Inc.,formally
ilotif i es you, by ciieans of thi s 1 etter, tha t we have wi thdratim from the
hearirg ard will proceed no further with this proposed change.
Again, we appreciate your input, and vrhile this is an expensive dECisiori
for us, it is a decision we gladly make.
,
Sinccr ly yours,
M D;l LOM EiVC•A
'~~m~~.l..~ t uk'
4
Robert H. Toi-iil i nson
f:MT:inb
TOMU"'I'SON AGENCY, INC. REALTCti--'
/ West 6061imrd Avenue • Spokane, WA 99204 •(509) 62Y J131 R E C E I V E ~
APR 15 1985
sroKaNE couNrY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
April 11, 1985
Doug Adams
Plat Administrator
Spokane County Panning Commission
N. 721 Jeff erson
Spokane, Washington 99206
Dear poug:
I hate to do thi s to you aya i n, but af ter our meeti ng wi th
the residents of the Midilome area and the opposition that
was voiced vie have decided to withdraw from the scheduled
hearing for A pril 18 and will leave Midilome at its R-1
designation.
Thank you for all your help and support.
Si,ncerely,
~
• -
-rrr~
Robert N. Tomlinson
Secretary
14idilome, Inc.
RHT:mb
r
I '
~TOMII o~o
Ila s i
Office Locations SPOKANE • SPOKANE VALLEY • CLARKSTON • LEWISTON, IDAHO /
\
t
, .
. , ° i•, tj
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BFiOADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
rPHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
% ~ J•L II .I_ f
SpOK4NC CQUn7Y GOU47 HOUSE
F ILE N0: pC--I!(~~,~ ~g' F ILE NAh1E: M 61 L-UJ'IA L Zf
PLAT F 1LE NiEMU
I PICKED UP THE PUBLIC INFURMNTION PACKET FOk THE ABOVE NAMEU pRELIMINARY
SUBD IV IS IUN.
.
DATE .
~
/
S I GNATU
4,
I
' ;
,
I
~
~*~r ° ~ ~tli~~
~
~
~ ~ ~
~
~
~ t
~
. ,
ERHIBIT "K"
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS. FILE 4D - ?e
COUNTY OF SPORANE )
(Print Name:)
Being first duly sw , deposes and says:
That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizea of the United
States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of
twenty-one years.
Tha t on ~ ~ , 19~- ,
he personally posted a sign( as 4equired in Chapter III, General Rules and
Regulatons, Section C, Paragraph 3 of the Spokane County Subvidision
Ordinance, (except 15 days) at the•following location in Spokane County,
to-wit:
A
~ ~ ~ ~~rr■■yy~! ~
~ ' ~ T ~ ~ ► ~
.
, J T
~ • .
4
Signature:.
~ ~
Applicant or Agent
Date `j6t
NOTARY PUBLIC . ' I
,
Suescribed and sworn [o me ' ~ •
7i, NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SpOKANE ,CDUN'I'Y, ~ WASAINGTON
Residing at Spokane, Washington
. ~
EXAIBIT ..J"
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) SS. FILE
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
(Print Name: ) e~ ►1. ~ h~::
Being first duly sworn on oatgC, deposes and says:
That I, the below signed, am a citizen of the Uaited States of America and
a resident of the State of Washington, and over the age of eighteen years.
That on the fj day of Feb r;uarv , 19 3.ri , I personally
deposited in the United States Mail at Third and Ei'oward
with sufficient postage prepaid, a.true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF
HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpaqers, as shown on
the Spokane Gounty Treasurer's records as of the rith day of
Februar' 1935 , who have been found to or~m property within a
four hundred-~ periphery of the Subdivider's owned, controlled or under
option property. The notices were addressed to those indivfduals and sent to
those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto aad
incorporated herein by reference.
~
%
Signature. .
DATED chis 5th day of February 19 65 .
NOTARY PUBLIC
Subscribed and sworn to me
~
19
:tOTtiF.°. PUt3L_C ?i1 AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Rebfding nr S{:ol<.ane, Washington
~ NOTE - Attach sample copy of items mailed.
. .
I
- 1
,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SROI►OWAY CENTRE 8U1LO1NG N 721 JEfF'ERSaN STREET
• :j ~ i -
~ r i ~1 »~It'•_ PHONE 456-2205
~ SPOKANE WOSHINGTaN 99260
•C /i A 1C .:'t' • _.iL q'
TO WNOM IT h1AY CONCERN
PLAT F I LE 1+1EM0
I picked up the public information packet for the Preliminar
Subdivision -,04C- ZYafD -7Y on this 16
day of 19fr, for adv tisement of the
Subdivision Hearing to be heard on 19~.
Name . cf
,
Signature:
L,. r.
picked up EXHIBIT "H" and "I" on
signature a e
i
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PQBLIC INFORMATION PACKET
L .
'40/~~4
SUBDIVISION NAME: ADD
2k.
FILE AEARING DATE:
Enclosed are the fotms necessary fot the Subdivider of the above referenced
subdivision to complete the public information requirements for subdividing in
Spokane County.
STEP 1: Take EXHIBIT "H" and EXHIBIT "I" to any local title company you may
select for a[itle search of property owners and taxpayers within four hundred
(400) feet of the periphery of the- proposed parcel. In those instances where
any portion of the abutting property is owned or controlled or under option by
the Subdivider or his representative, then all property owners within 400 feet
of said applicant's property shall be shown on the maps. The title company
search shall be current within thirty (30) days of the public Hearing.
STEP 2: Utilizing the addresses obtained in STEP 1 and copies of the Agenda
Notification (enclosed), the Subdivider sfiall noCify all property owners
abutting (or directly across a street or road) the subject site by CERTIFIED
MAIL at least fifteen (15) days prior to the Hearing. The Subdivider shall
notifp all property owners not abutting the subject aite, yet within a 400
foot radius of the periphery of the subject site, by regular mail at ieast
fifteen (15) days prior to the Hearing. Property owners are those shown on
the most current Treasurer's computer records obtained by the applicant from a
title company no older than thirty (30) days prfor to the Hearing. PUBLIC
iVOTICE (Agenda Notification) shall be mailed to said property owner. Whenever
the names and/or addresses of the owner are not available, the taxpayer shall
be not if ied .
Note: The plat sponsor is responsible for verifying the completeness of the
title company ownership list against the assessor map(s) and must certify same.
~ STEP 3: The Subdivider wiLi provide a sign on-site as herein described at
least fifteen (15) days prior to the Hearing. The sign shall be located in
the MOST CONSPICUOUS PLACE that can be seen from public roads and more than
one sign may be necessary. Contact the Subdivision Administrator if you have
any questions.
STEP 4: The Subdivider shall provide the Affidavit of Posting, Affidavit of
Mailing, certified mail cards and all returned letters to the Planning Staff
prior to the public hearing for inclusfon to the file.
Note: If the above affidavits are not in the file prior to the public
hearing, the item canno[ be heard and will need to be continued to another
hearing date.
,
. .k
COVER LETTER - EXHIBIT "H"
DATE:
T0:
FROM:
SUBJECT : lpg lff~~~
Please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record of all
property located within 400 feet of the proposal outlined on the attached
assessor map(s). The ad3acent property oWners should be marked f or CERTIFIED
MAIL.
The property owner list must be current and within 30 days of the public
hearing date as indicated on EXNIBIT "I".
s . ~
• A
EXHIBIT "I..
Aplication is for a
CERTIFICATON OF TITLE COMPANY:
I do hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses
consisting of the attached pages has been prepared from the latest available
records and is to the best of my kno le ge correc , and that this information
is current within 34 days of the hearing date.
~
A1
Si ned b : 8 Y ~ Da t e• .
For : /TL-c~
(Title Company)
CERTIFICATION OF PLAT SPONSOR:
I, the below signed sponsor or agent to the sponsor, have verified the
attached title company ownership list with the attached assessor map(s) and
find that all tax parcel numbers within 400 feet shown on the assessor map(s)
have been listed by the title company.
Also that all property adjacen[ the nroposal (including any property
immediately across a street or road from the proposal) has been marked for
"Certified" mailing.
Si8ned b9: te :
i
J
NEARING EXAI4INER COMMITTEE PUBLIC }IEARING
,
IXPPLICATION NO:~~ -//~~J -
~
(theck one) ~ ~ - J 7~ ~
I would like to be on record in
~
FAVOR ~°e
C-, ; fz_-4.
~ r OPPOSITION
NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
Z;Z7 YES ~
No
YUU R NAf4 E:
(please print) ~
Addres s :
~ .
HEARI9(~G EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICATION NO:-? - -
(Check one)
I would like to be on record in
FAVOR
OPPOSITION
l ~ NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
YES
~ NO ~
YOUR NAME: CL i FFC;PL' ~ CA+2.LISLr
(please print)
Address : ~ -3 6
1
~2v~
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING
jf.~- - l /6~D 7 4Y.
APPL ICAT ION NO : Z F 3 - 7,~
(Check one)
I would like to be on record in
FAVOR
~ QPPOSITION
l ~ NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
YES
NO
YOUR NAME : (please print)
Address : j/0 3 J?
~
~
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC NEARING.
APPLICATION N0:
(Check one)
I woul d 1 i ke to be on record i n
/ r FAVOR
OPPOSITION
C ~ NEUTRAL
Oo you wish to TESTIFY a t this Hearing?
~ r YES
NO
6
YOUR
NAME .
(please print)
Addres s :
~y
NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING
,
A PL IC ION NO
C ck one) ~F ~13
I would like to be on record in
~ r FAVOR
OPPOSITION
NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
~ YES
/ f No
~ YOUR NAME : D4 ye 06
(please print)
-L
Address: a 3 ~
NEARING EXAMINER ....COMMITTEE PUBL-IC HEARING
,
APPL IC V : z~ i3 - 7W
(Check
I would like to be on record in
l r FAVOR
.
~ OPPOSITION
f ~ NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
YES
~ NO
YOUR NAME :
(please print
Add res s :
i
HEARIIi6 EXAMINER COMMITTEE PU6LIC NEARING
~
A LICATION N0. llaib7i
(Check one)
I would like to be on record in
f ~ FAVOR
~ r QPPOSITION
NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
YES .
NO
~ YOUR NAME : r .I6/uG10=--6evv
(please prin (J
Address:
L~
HEARING EXAMIAtER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING
~IPPLICA N NO:
lP
(Check one)
I would like to be on record in
~ / FAYOR
~ j OPPOSITION
~ / NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
~ r YES
~ f NO
- ~
YOUR NAt~IE~ ~ -F-~
(please prin ) --11?- L
Address: / 1
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING
APPL ICAT ION N0:
(Ch 6ck ~ 2 I w like to be on record in
FAVOR
Z
OPPOSITION
NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
YES
i ~ r,o
YOUR NAME :
(please print)
Address .
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PU6LIC HEARING
APPLICATXN N0: /7,6 -
( e one)
I ul d 1 i ke to be on record i n
'o
FAVOR
~f OPPOS IT ION Ta pe.~0%6
l ~ NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
~ J YES
~ r NO ^
YOUR NAME :
(please print f
Address : .S• / ~d b~~
HEARING EXAt4INER COMMITTEE PUBLIC EIEARING
aPP ~((.aD, !J
N0.
LI >bne)
(Che
I wou 1 d 1 i ke to be on record i n
/ / FAVOR
LL7,7 OPPOSITION
/ r NEU7RAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
427 YES
C ~ NO ,
YOUR NAME : y -
(please print)
~ . - ~ Address. ~ - ~ ~ ~-'`!t
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PU6LIC HEARING
aPPLICATION NO: 7V
(Check one) -
I would like to on record in
~ F _oR
OPPOSITION
~
00
r f NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
f ~ YES
YOUR NAME : ~r✓~S/~'11~5-~~
~
(please pri-nt)"''
address: c .
~r
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING
I 1' %
APPL ICATION NO:~
(C lul ck one) Id-1 i ke to be on record i n
FAVOR
OPPOSITION
NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
.
YES
/ r NO
YOUR NAME : , nn
(please print ' r
i
Address .
- r-- v
Y
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICATION N r,4-,
(Che on
I wo ike to be on record in
C ~ FAVOR
~ OPPOSITION
/ I NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing?
YES
~ NO
YOUR NAME :
(please print
P_j
Address . . ~ I o r
_ _ x
; Y
MIDIL0ME Ifdi>. .
- W. bOb Third Avenue - Spokane, Washington 99204
,(509) 624-9131 . , February 14, 1985
Mr. Doug Adarris . Plat Adi-ilinistra-tor .
Spokane Cour.ty Pl anni ng Commi ssi on _ . ,
14. 721 Je-Fferson Street - Spokane, Wash.irj~jtbn 99206 -
RE: Midi lome 4th Addi'tion
, PC--1168-73 .
ZE-13-78
Gear Mr. Adams :
Midilome, Inc., wishes to have their hearing for a Change of Condit,ion taken off the calendar for February 2 1985.- (See ^age 2, Item 3 of
. -.the public notice as attached). _
Ver, ru,~y y Urs,
. , /
. . i
Ro ert H. Toml i nson . Secretar.y Mi.dilome, Inc. RHT:mb
Enc. . ~
,
.
V Yj
i /
. ~
n r . l p l-~
' /11_7~_~~~1rC~li'11Q~~,j I~('~. i~~_''.~'x•'IU ~t..,.!;, ~
1 I 1 ~ i
GREL IM1NARY SUBUIVISDUN ANU ZONE -~EGLASSIFIc.A1
? • ,'E-1484-84, ALCOTT GROVE 1 ST ADOITION . . . . . . . . . . . 4, u:aZE-4-85, Mi ni ng and Agri cul tural tc R-~'
~~;oriso r: 321-9512 SU rVe~lO r/ til~l rl_L r: J~ i-17 ):i
Pete Zayncr ^ Geral d hlas~ai
W. 314 Rosewood N. 2919 hlon roE,
Spokane, WA 99208 Spokane, Wi°,
Loca tio«: Getween 8th arid 12th Averjues, I yii►c- ::;ij~c~~n~.
westerly oF Cariahar► Sto?c~ ;r, --_tiol, , i,,,r, ,hi~;
~P0;',t1_:' "of_i!~~r.
UPI)AN, w1 `l,hlii ..IIE2 ;'PrlU1-l ',y
L i;ILd
f'r-oposal: To establish 29 residentia] lots for single family )r
duplex use. One lot is designated as open space. The appli cat;t
i ri ~ii cates ~7ssibi 1 ity of Ci t;~ of Spok~~ri!~ ~('WP1• Ser-vi rc:.
.,!i:L 1.0~~UI i i~ld~;
3. PE-1168-789 MIUILUh1.L 4TN AUGI-f1Ur4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
' ZE-13-783, Changc of 24 lots-to k-2 zoriiri ; Siiciisor: 624-9131 Surveyor; C►,,l I':
~MIDILOME INC., Mi ke E'hi l 1 4~:
c/o Ed (3ueshl%e N. 909 Argoriro_ I•:ci.
W. bOb 3rd Ave.
,
99_ I
Lc_c_<<10 1: 1) mp c,~e..i I I + wt~u i d L)c~ i ttL~ dj ~I cei i lL c
and we;r.orl.; of Pines Roaci betweeri 32nd and 40th AvenuW.
C,.mprehensive_f1_1an: URaAN, witl}in the Priority Sewer Service hrea.
~t-oposal: To cl(assify 24 lots of Aidilonw-3 4th Additiori to k,--'
zoni rty f ront the p revi ous 1 yapp r-oved R-1 zoiie. The appl i cariL
a,it.i ci pates dupl ex devel opne»t of the 1 ots wi th indi vi dual ir, i•_ ,
n'i1~1F't.~ hy
0 MEMO RaN uuN
TO : S poltune County Pl anni ng - ('rel i mi na ry Pl ats
FROM: Spol(ane County Util ities
DATE : 2
SIBJEC i: P~r !16 P "D~~ _ 7~ FEB 8 19$5
SPOKANE Gotj,iiY
PLANNING DEPAHIMEIVT
Recomenciations are as Ci rc1 ed :
(1) Pursuan. 'to the Board of County Cammissioners Resolution No. 80-04I8, the
use of an-site sewer disposal systems i s hereby authorized. This authoriza.-
tic,n i s condi tioned on compl i ance wi tIi al 1rui es and regula tions of the
Spoicane County Heal t1i District and i s i urther condi ti oned and sGbjcct to
speci fic appl ica i.i on approval and issuance of permi ts by trie hcal th Distri ct.
(2) T1ie dedi cati on sha i i s tate "The owner(s) or Succes sor( s) i n i n terest agree ta
authorize the County to pl ace the i r name(s) on a peti ti on for the formati on
of a ULID by peLition method pursuant to RDd 36.94 viiiicli the petition incluctes
the Owner(s) property and further not to object by the signing of a protest
petition against the format-ion of a ULID by resolution method pursuant to RCtJ
Chapter 36.94 whi ch i ncl udes -(:he Owner(s) property. PROV[DtO, thi s candi tiori
shall no~ prohibit tfie Owner(s) or Successor(s) from objection io aiiy assess-
ment(s) oii the property as a resuli of irnprovements ca11ed for in conjunction
with the farmation of a ULIO by eiiher petition or resolution metiiod under RC4J
~ Cliapter 36. 94. "
191\, Any watei^ service for this project sliall be pravidEd in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System f'ian for Spolcarie County, as amEndEde
(4) ihere arn. no recorrmnndations concerning the me-L1iod af sewaqe disposal as
the project i s outside of the 201 sewer s i.uay area.
(5) Watzr servi ce as approved by the 'Spokane County HEaI th District and/or the
Washington State Departlient af Social and Health Services.
(S) The cledica -Lion slial l state: "Each dwel 1 ing uni t shal 1 be doubl e pl umbed for
connecti on to futui-e area-wide co 11 ecti on sys tems. "
(7) A dry sewer connec tion tq the ruture area-wi de Sewerage System i s to be
constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry seYrer connecttoii are to
be reviewed and approved by the Uti 1 i ties Department.
(8) Lo-cated within the Critical Water Supply Service Area but not within any
pi;rveyor's district. May be serviced by an incfividual well awned and oper-
a ted by l ot owner.
(9) Any sewerage service for thi spt^o jec t shal 1 be provided in accordarice wi th
the Comprehensive 4lastewater Planagement Plan for Spolca►ie County, as amenc~ed.
' M us T CaAtA/ercT__ 70 Pug~(C- 51QwV2 r49-rC`74
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER ~
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
~'c ~e /V , 1985
TO: PLANNI NG DEPARTMENT
FROM; COUNTY ENGINEER'S DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: ROAD CONDIT ONS'~ FOR PLAT NAh1 M1di Io, E NUMBER /l~ S-D
CONDITIONS ~IRCLED APPLY TO PLAT ~NDER I.ONSIDERATION
~ E 1 that conditlonal approval of the plat by the County Engineer ts glven subJect to
° dedtcation of Rtght-of-Way and approval of the road system as (ndicated in the
preliminary plat of record.
' (Dproposed that plans, proftles, and cross sections as des(gned to County standards showing
street centerllne and curb grades be submltted to the County Engineer for
approval pr(or to constructlon and/or the filing of a final plat; road plans to be
prepared under the dlrection of a Itcensed Protesslonal Clvtl Engineer.
~ E 3 that drainage plans and design calculations showing the al(gnment of drainage
,y tacilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approvai prlor to construction
and/or the ftling of the ftnal plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the
direction of a Ilcensed Professtonal Clvtl Engtneer.
E 4-that the regulattons ot the Natlonai Flood Insurance Program be observed slnce the
proposed plat ts affected by a Flood Hazard Zone.
E 5 constructfon wtthin the proposed publtc streets and easements shall be performed
under the dlrect supervtslon of a Ilcensed englneer/surveyor, who shali furnish the
County Engineer wlth "As Bullt" plans and a cert(ficate in wrlting that all Improve-
ments were tnstalled to the I(nes and grades shown on the approved constructlon plans
and that all dlsturbed monuments have been replaced;
(Dof no constructlon work Is to be performed aithln the existing or proposed Publtc Right
Way untll a permlt has been tssued by the County Englneer. AIl work ts sub,ject to
Inspection and approval by the County Englneer;
E 7 all construction withln the exlst(ng or proposed Public Right of Way is to be com-
pleted prlor to flling the flnal plat or a bond In the amount estimated by the County
Engineer to cover the cost of constructton ot tmprovements, construct(on certtfica-
tlon, "As Bullt" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines shall be ftled wtth
the County Engtneer;
eCounty no direct access trom lots to 1/2 Rlght of Ways unt(I such roads are constructed to
Standards and establ(shed as County Roads;
E 9-no direct access fr-om lots to Stub Road connect(ons untll such roads are constructed
to County Standards and establlshed as County Roads;
E10-road des(gn, constructlon, and dratnage control for I/2 Right ot Ways and Stub Road
connections are the responsibillty of the Developer;
, (Dtrust that appropriate provlston be made that the following descrlbed property be held in
untit the continuatfon of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A I ft. strlp at
the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Tem-
porary cul de sacs are requlred when streets terminate at the piat boundaries.)
v~ E12 a statement must appear in the dedicatory tanguage of the plat that Indtv(dual drive-
way access permits be requ(red prlor to Issuance of a bullding permlt for dr(veway
approaches to the County road system.
E13 dedicatton of addlfilonal Rlght of Way along IQNE,ycw, a
, addltional Rlght of Way along
additional R(ght of Way along
~ EIQ a statement shall be placed In plat dedlcation that no dlrect access be allowed from
1 o ts- y B1oc.1%. 2 Lot,$ / o.vd -7 8lock- I,,~tS $LQ&d /~'1_B/ock 3 LorS r'o oAvd 2. $/ock 9 J
Lo4 S %2 o.#Ad 14 IgOmcK tl To p1,0/GS /poqc/•
E15-that a statement be placed In the plat dedication provlding for future slope ease-
ments as requlred by Spokane County along •
E16-exlsting County roads provdddng dlract access to the plat shall ba paved and/or
curbed to Spokane County standards.
E17-that all public roads wlthln the pfat ba deslgned and constructed to Spokane County
standards.
~ E I g tha t 5 d dewa I ks are requ i red aI ong ttio ar ter ! a I( s) on Pihes Rpq4.
(5( F'ub I ic Road Standard 1 Yh' I C4l Roadwa y Sh~. t i on
_Q tr_ . MI n d rnum Pav f nq w 1 .1 tri C,o1~eC.~c_
1) Sec1 ior. '4umbar 2, For LORts` -
l?) Secta - n Number ~ For Mdnlmum Pavlny * I d t h ~plPeGtha
S
~it i e N u m b e~ r 2 For MJnlrnum f'avln y wJd1h SCC~nd Ai~~._~`~`~Qi~!~. s1'~•
. ~ .
(.l) 5~,,:t! i Ivumher ForZlm,_ _ Mdn(mum PavOng w i d t h
~e.Q----- ^ -
~c. 1Gr 2 rn~ Arc.r
~20 the word "appllcant" shail tnclude the owner or owners of the Rroperty, hds helrs,
asslqns, an(1 succPSSOrs.
E2~ to construct the road Improvements stated herein, the appldcant may, wQth the approv-
al of the County Engtneer, joln In and bA a wdlllng partlcipant In any petitlon or
resolution whlch purposes Is the formatdon ofi a Road Improvement Distrdct (R1D) for
said improvements pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. At such tlme as an RID !s
created or any Road Impr-ovement Project 1s sanctloned by Spokane County, the lmprove-
ments requlred (curb, sidewalk, dradnage control and paving to eKisting pavement)
will be at the sole expense of the undersigned owner, thelr helrs, grantees and d
asslgns. TV%:S p¢ouI Sio~ iS tspplice:k d►c- -ro ImProve~er-CS Sipec4ltd ~R02 32 1
Av~Nt~E •
E22 as an alternat(ve method of constructing the road dmprovement sta*ed hereJn, the
applicant may, with tne approval of the County Engineer, accompllsh the road dmprove-
ments stated herein by ,jolning and partlcdpatdng !n a County Road praject (CRP) to
the extent of the required road Improvement. At such tlme as an RIO ds created or
any Road Improvement Pro,Ject is sanctdoneci by Spokane County, the Improvements re-
qulred (curb, sddewalk, drainage control and paving to existing pavement) w01t be at
the sole expense ofi the underslgned owner, their hedrs, grantees nd asslgns. T'h.g
prL0V1s10N iS AQpl:cab\tz -t-o '~M~~o ver+ne~J~s SpetKleA ~02 32 Ave.,uc .
E23 that the following statement be placed In the plat dedicatlon: The owners, their
hefrs, grantees and assfgns, agree to joln In the formation ot a County Road
Improvement Distrdct pursuant to R.C.W. 36.88 at such tlme as a Road Improvement
Dsstrict (s created or any Road Improvement Pro,ject Is sanctloned by Spokane County.
The lmprovements required (curb, sldewalk, dra0nage control and pavtng) wlll be at
the sole expense of the owner, thefr heirs, grantees and assigns. tUi6 prov1stc!*s~~5 41
qQp~~c~b1~a -t-o i MProv-tsmeAA S 5?eci~►ed, f-02 321--d- 4Y En%&& .
E24-that the sponsor shall prepare and submtt to the County Engdneer a design proposal
acceptable to the State Haghway Department ofi the proposed State Hlghway-County Road
intersection. State HOghway Department approval of the proposed design must be
recelved prlor to the flling of the ftnal piat. Improvements to the State Hlghway
are to be the responslbilQty of the Sponsor and may either be constructed or a bond
to cover the cost of such dmprovements turnished to the County Englneer In the amount
as determdned by the County Engdneer and the State H6ghaay Department.
E25-the proposed private road(s) as shown on the prellmdnary plat serving lots wdth:
no extensdon possible; extensaon to serve 8 or less lots; tuture pubiic
Right of Way tract ds approved by the County Englneer.
E26-that private road(s) be improved to Spokane County standard for a prdvate road
standard servdng lots. Subject to approval under
section 10.207 of the Spokane County Fdre Code.
E27-that the folloNdng provlsaon be made that the tollowing Gescribed property be held In
trust until the contlnuatlon of the prlvate road and the "Tract X" Is deaded or ded3-
cated: a I ft. strip at the ends or edges of all private "Tract X" thet terminate or
border the piat boundary.
E28-a statement shall be placed In the plat dadication that the "Tract X" prlvate road(s)
contalned w(thln this plat is/are for the sole use of parcels wfthtn the plat untll
such tdme as the roadway ds dmproved and established as a publlc road.
E29-that the fiollowdng statement be placed In the plat dedicatlon:
WARNING: Spokane County has no responslbllity to bulld, Improve, madntain, or other-
wOse servace the prdvate roads contalned withln or providing servtce to the property
descrlbed In thds plat. By accepting this piat or subsequently by a1lowOng a
, buQlding permit to be issued on property on a prlvate road, Spokane County assumes no
obligatlon for saad prlvate road and the owners hereby acknoaledge that the County
has no obllgation of any kdnd or nature whatsoever to establish, examine, survey,
construct, alter, repadr, amprove, maintaln, provdde drainage or snow removal on a
private road. ThOs requdrement Is and shali run Nith the land and shall be bdnding
upon the owner, their hedrs, successors or assJgns dncluddng the obldgataon to parti-
cdpate In the maintenance of the prdvate road as provdded heredn.
E30 the proposed piat shall be lmproved to the standards set forth in Spokane County
. ~
8oard of Commass0oners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, whdch estabidshes reguta-
tions for roads, approaches, drainage, and fees In neN construction.
~
. ~ E31 the County Enganeer has examdned this development proposal and has determined that
the dmpact of this proposal upon the exdstdng County Road System warrants the dedica-
t'on ot addltional ydght-of-way and the roadway improvements heredn specified.
~
f~ E32 Thas plat or development proposal ds located wdthtn a drainage basan whtch has been
Identified by the Spokane County Engdneerts Office as havdng stormwater runoft prob-
lems. Sdnce thds plat or devetopment proposal is affected by or ds a contributor to
stormwater tlows, property owners should partdcapate In the planndng and Implementa-
tJon of a future basJnwade stormwater management system. The followdng "ConCdtlon of
Approval" shall be required: That the owner(s) or successor(s) 1n interest agree to
,Jodn In any County approved Stormv+ater Management Program and to pay such rates and
charges as may be fdxed through publdc heardngs for service or benoflt obtained by
the plenndng, desdgn, construct3ng, maJntadndng, or operatdon of stormwater control
faciltties.
91 1/4
~ ~
]RE CEfV ED
'
JAN 2 9 i ~PQKANE COUNTY NEALTH DISTRIC
Inter-Office Communication
SPOKANE COgNTY DATE: January 29, 1985
PLANNING DEPaRTMEMT
Tc): Subdivisioa 'nistrator, Spokane County
FROM: llaryl F. Wa .S., Environmeatal Health Division Field Supervisor
SUBJEC'T: Proposed Preliminary Plat: PE-116D-78 (Midilime 4th Addition)
Change of Conditions
References :
a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 200' by Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, daLed
December 10, 1984, received by this office January 25, 1985.
b. Reconnaissance Geologic Map of the West Half of the Spokane Quadran&le,
Washington and Idaho, Allan B. Griggs, 1968.
c. Soil Survey, Spokane Couaty, Washiagton, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A.,
March, 1968.
d. Spokane County, Washington, Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conservation
Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974.
e. Rules and Regulations of the State Board of Health for On-site Sewage
Disposal Systems, D.S.H.S., July, 1983.
f. Map: Freeman Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S.,
1973.
F'indings :
a. This project li.es over the Spokane Aquifer.
b. It is within Critical Water Supply Servicc Area No. 3 and within the ser-
vice area of Model Irrigation District. Water supply will be a public
system. Groundwater resources appear adequate to support development at
the proposed density.
c. The project is inside the Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Man-
agement Area; inside the General Sewer Service Area, and inside the
Priority Sewer Service Area recommended in the '201' Study. The method
of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities,
Spokaae County, pursuant to County Resolution 80.0418 adopted March 24,
1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for
use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems. The lots are not of
the proper dimensions to permit the use of both individual wells and
sewage systems.
d. The project lies in a relatively flat area east of Bowdish Road and
north of 40th Avenue. Local drainageways are insignif.icant.
~
Propose~ Preliminary PIA. PE-116Da78 (Midilarne 4th Addn. hange af Conditians
Page 2
January 29, 19$5
e. Surface soil.s are classed as Garrison very gravelly loam, aad Springdale
gravelly santly loam wit~ 07, to 200/. slopes. They have a septic tank filter
fie1d lamitatian of slight ta severe wYth the majority classed as moderate.
There is als❑ possible contarninatian of graundwater. The sofl, based on
textural cZassification is Type T .
f. Geolflgically, the sni.ls are g3aciofIuvia1 deposits. These geological
structures general3.}x y'ield rnoderate to very large arn~unts a€ water.
The Madei Irrigation District has indicated that 3t can. supply domestic
use water fvr the project.
Recammendatians:
, The fa.nal plat shall be desigged as indicated on the preliminary plat
of recard and/or attached sheets as noted.
b. Apprvpri-ate utrl-ity easements shall be indzeated on copi+es of the pre-
liminary pla~ of record for r~~str.ibution lay the Planning Department ta
the utility companies, County Engineer, and Spokane Caunty Health Districk..
Written apprvval of the easements by the utility companies must be re-
ce?.ved pxior to the submittal of the final plat.
~ Sewage disposal method shall be as autharized by the Director ❑f Utili.ties,
Spokane County.
A statement shall be placed ia the dedzcation ta the effect that: PTA
publf c sewer system will be rnade aaailable for the plat and individual
service wi1l be prgvided to each lot prior to sale. Use of individuaI
onrsite sewage systems shall not be autharized".
Water service shall be coardinated t}7.rough the Director vf Utilities,
Sgokane Countp.
Water service shall be by an exi.sting puUlYc water supply when approved
by the Regianal Engzneer (Sgokane), State Departrn~nt of Social & Health
Serv-iees.
~ Priar ta filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that
the plat lies within the recorded service area of `Ghe water system prv-
posed to serve the glat. The dedicato~y language on the plat shall state:
"Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited."
A plan for water faczlities adequate for domestic use, dornestic irriga-
tion use and fixe protection use sk~all be approved by the water purveyor.
Said water plaa must have been approved by th~ fire protection dzstriet
and the appxopriate health authorities. The health authoritYes, water
supglier (purveyor),and fire pratection di~~rict wil1 c~rtify, Frior to
the £iling of the ffnal plat, on the face of saai.d water plan that the
plan is in conformance with their requirements and wi1.l adequately satisfy
their respective needs. Said water plan and certificatran will #e drafted
on atransparency suitabie for r~produ~tion.
~Proposed Preliminary Pla : PE-116D-78 (Midilome 4th Addn. Change of Conditions
Page 3
January 29, 1985 The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final piat on a copy
of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been
made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accor-
dance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will
provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection
by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building
permits caitha.n the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a
provision holding Spokane County, Spokane County Health District, and
the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building
permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the
approved water system.
The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The
public water system as approved by County and State health authorities
and the local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this
plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water ser-
vice as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot."
dc
c: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
c: Michael Phillips
N. 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, Washington 99212
c: Midilome, Inc.
c/o Ed Bueshke
W. 606 - 3rd Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99201
R E C E V
E
JAN 2 9 11085
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING OEPARTMENT
~d .
RECEIPT Date-, ec I~ 19sy 967"
Received From vl~'dl~&IwAX <°~'tn.c, - ~
Address S 7:~l ' ~S ~
Q~ `w A ~~zo 6
~-r-
'Dollars Q'`r' fl ~^~'`'c~^'e.C' ~ t-I $ 1SO • cA? ~
Fo r
pa
ACCOUNT NOW PAID I$ppXIJE COUNTY PLANNlIVG DEpAFiI.U=
ACCO ~Ni I CASH ~
AM1 PAID ~ CHECK S'
9ALANCE ~ MONEY D V
~ DUE ORDER ~
~ ~ i
BKSOb pedif9rm /
«
,
t, }
y
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~at~~
~eceirr~d Fror~ ~'~n~~
~r~,~ ~ ~~r
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~+,,,,,f, ~t r ~ollc~r $
: ~ ~ ~ ~c~~ : l I~~- ~ ~
~a~~i° ,
~ r~~~ ~ ~ ~.1 ~ow~~„~~:- ~"ac.~t~''r~
~ ~~~.d~ , „
H~1N PAI~
~~r~r t~ G45H ~ ~
~r~~~fll~Nr ~ ~ ~
L
A~MT PAID G~E~I( k
~ ~ ~
8~,~~n~C~ ~ , O~aEqr ~ ,E
~ DU~ ~ ,
~
8K80b Red~Cf~r~
_ _ , 1
~
VvWa ; t 1 S KLV 8
. •
E F , „COPY"
Al~ C 12 p
THE PQWER COMPANY
TER .
•
Electric and Natural Gas Servsce
P 0 ti0h 3727 • SPOKAEqE WASHINGTON 99220 • 1509) 488-0500
,
August 9, 1985
Mr. Michael C. Phillips
Clarence E. Simpson Engineering Inc.
North 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, tdA 99206
Re: Midilome Fourth Edition
Dear Mr. Phillips:
Enclosed is a copy of the above-captioned plat which our Engineering
Department has reviewed for utility strips.
Please be advised that additional utility strips will be required as shown
outlined in red on the returned print. This is for natural gas facilities
only. The property is not in our Company's electric service area.
If you have any questions regarding utility strips, please contact
Patty Johnson at 489-0500, Extension 2666.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Sincerely,
Linda J. Nihoul
Permit Coordinator
Land Services
LJN:wpc
Enclosure
cc: Spokane Co. Planning Dept.
5 E R V I N G T H E I N L A N D E M P I R E 0 i W A S H I N G T 0 N A N D I D A H 0
1
CLA' E E. SIMPSON ENGINEERS, ~y~...:~.
CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
N. 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, Washington 99212
Telephone: 926-1322
TO:
SU BJ ECT: KA A d f i ~
DATE: 3 j Q.. 1 g (o
Ont
e~A4,r. ~ ~ L-S on c- f;2 r i k-A 1) ~ v -cn~.!
64,.
C r ~
C CYl_ v r v ~a, n c+ 1 T e[ h y C U M ~'r+ c.~ S Q~ e.t. s~_ I'? c.~'t ~ t., !
J
Signe
I
. ~
I
INLAND PUWER & LIGH-1- CUMPANY
April 10, 1986
Spokane County Planning Commission
721 North Jeff erson
Spokane, WA 99260
Gentlemen:
This is to advise that adequate easements have been secured for ~
the installation of electrical service to your Plat No. PE 1168-D78
owned by Midilome, Inc., in Section 33, Township 25 North, Ranne 44 N
EWM.
Sincerely, I
ZINL;AND 7P0WWER&,.-- GHT COMPANY Steve L. Plewman
Field Enqineer
SLP:ds:00
I
i 5 E C: t.' N l; A v t N U ' l: b ~ x , s
_ :T - -
4
Plat t and Name--,~-,//,65(O- 79
FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST
~
SEE CHECKED
I N i OUT COr1MENTS 8Y b DATE
1. Received 7 Blueline CopieS and 1 Assessor's P1ap of property
, outlined in red
~ 2. Maps Circulated to: Building Codes ~ Assessors -v
Treasurers wi th Assessors Map / ~.Heal th Di stri c~
Utilities L,----
3. Fi nal Plat Leroyed and/or Legi ble . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
L--T 4. Subdivision Mame ~7-io-ss~
5. Section, Township and Range -7-/a
6. Certificate to Plat (no older than six months) - e
I
' 7. Notarized Si gnature of I~ashi ngton -7- ~o-
,
~
8. Sheet size 24" x 36"
~
9. tlorth Arrow and Scale (50' = 1 100' = 1", 200 = 1' ) . . . . . -7--F t;40
10. 6old Boundary Line of Plat s
11. Location and width of Proposed streets, alleys, right of
ways, easenents, parks, open space and proper labeling
of spaces and streets to be dedicated to the public and
adjacent properties
12. Street name(s) 7_/;-;o
r
13. Check lot sizes compatible with plat approval b Zoning
Ordinance
14. 80 ft. at building line for culdesac lots
~
~
15. Layout, numbers and dimens i ons of 1 ots and/or parcel s...... -7- /o-g5 3)O
16. Check dedication for conditions of preliminary plat
aPProval
~
17. Check Restrictive Covenants for Ordinance Conflicts.......
u ~ a, ~Jumber and type of Uni ts wi th Condi ti ons of aoproval ~-t_
I
19. 1 ft. strips indicated . . . . . . . . . . . ~ r7, rv B S
~ 0. Easement verification and illustration on Plat Map
021. Water Letter or Plan (with Co.Fire Ptar, hal si
~
• ~ , ,L fct.•~~~c.,~
22. Power Letter.. . . . . . . . L
?t (P
2 3. Phone Letter ~
24. Check easments, Clouds on property, etc. from
Certificate to Plat
,
25. Check for Compl i ance wi th Shorel i nes Manaqements Act
1~. 26. Exi s ti ng Zooi4N i s Changed to
' 27. Fee of g"~ ' i s pa i d?
Taxes pai . - , ~ . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . : : : . .i
~
28. SEPA Notice of Action
~ . . . .
,
i ~
29. Legal Description Prcofed ( title report to dedication
30. BoCC Resolu tian typed and proofed .
~ ~
. ~
. , .
~ OFICE CF 1NE
~
1: .
' ' „ , • ~ r GIMMM.
, ~ i , f.•. .
. - PLANfVING tEPAREW
I
DATE Jum za, , 19$5
• ' • • 1 ;.j ' 4. 1.. ' ' • 1'• ' ..r~.. • .
' •►~«~1K t~Yltf~ MYA~ wlU~t
. Gbunty EDiqi1'mr1 MilitiAs/, Health D.iBtSiC't;
To: 8uilding & safety,
~
. subdivi.siaz Administratar
$l$JECT: Aerview of Final Plat(a)
,
Enclossid gleaae find attached vopies cf the p~r~~oeed firal plat far:
~1. 9wan A~es 3rd A+~dition ~ • I.'~'~~ 6•t~
2. Midilame 4th Ad~dition - NEE 0'1~ E~c~T~e Aa o~M A~t~i~NT, onr~R+~+Kt OK. ~'j,~v ~
3. Missian Ridge 2nd Addition -om OlC. :-so'W
4. Aobingon A►dditfon pK ,),A%r*
If you have ar:y pzobloas with arty of tWLs (ase) psoject (s) . plrease let etie know
at ymw earlfest vowwifaoe. v.
Thanks.
nA: a j Enclrosurqs • • .
r
1. Fln&L,-J
2. Decliaatt'3+Ot'i
3. P-lat; CAS#.ificabe
4. Assessor's Map
?OKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter-Office Commuaication
Date July 2, 1985
T0: S Countv
FROM: kS,
- Envirannental Health Divisior.
SUBJECT: pE-l16$D_79 (MicLilome 4th. Addn. ) - Draft "Final" !'.eV1(:k'
Please be advised that this agenc;r : as reviewed a draft "~'ir.al'~ pla~ for tlle
above subject project; exid has determined it to be satiafa,ctory as submitted.
Therefore, we are ready and willing to sign the Pinal milar when circulatec
for signatures. Note: We are unsure if a WATER PLAP1 has been submitted or
not...please check.
cc: Direetor of Utilities, Snokane Countv
R E C EivE~~
S F 0 K A NE C J;.! i Y
PLANNIfiG DI►'~1~ rM E N 1
4
Transsmeriv Transamerica ! N~ L%' ►'r; ;a :.I _U J PJ I ~1 t1 d l d
Title Insuranca GomF Gf. Fi(','1 ] pll tf Y O;l S
Title ServiCeS North 720 Argonne Road
. ~ Spokane, Washington 99212
(509) 922-2222 N~~ i.
~
I A
CERTIFICATE TO PLAT
Order No. LM-124804M
Certificate for Filing
Proposed Plat of
MIDILOME FOURTH ADDN
,
: 6 ~
Tomlinson Agency
W. 606 Third Avenue
Spokane
Attn: Robert Tomlinson
Dear Sir:
In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has
examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane
County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States
Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby
certifies that the title to the following described land situate in
Spokane County, to wit:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 33, Township 25 North,
Range 44 E.W.M. described as follows:
BEGINNING at the South corner of Lot 1, Block 5, MIDILOME
THIRD ADDITION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 17
of Plats, page 10; thence, the next 9 courses along the
Easterly line of said THIRD ADDITION, North 36°56'18" East
135.00 feet; thence North 52°00'37" East 62.28 feet; thence
North 35°56'S2" East 250.00 feet; thence North 19°28'l1"
East 52.32 feet; thence North 37°16'59" East 36.45 feet;
thence North 54°09'24" East 155.00 feet; thence North 71°
19'42" East 155.72 feet; thence North 07°52'24" t,Test 125.94
feet to a point on a curve concave to the Southeast with a
radius of 608.392 feet, a radial bearing of No rth 07°52'24"
West and a central angle of 4°53'S3"; thence Westerly, along
the arc, 52.01 feet to the East line of MIDILOME SECOND ADDI-
TION, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 16 of Plats, page i
78; thence North 00°26'00" West, along said East line, 505.06
feet to the South line of 32nd Avenue; thence South 89°47'00" I
East, along said South line, 500.02 feet to the West line c?f
(continued)
1
.
Page .
LEGAL vLSCRIP1I0t1 (COnt) :
Pines Road; thence South 00°26'00" East, along said West line,
1405.33 feet; thence South 89°34'00" West 150.00 feet; thencc
South 00°26'00" East 45.00 feet; thence South 89°34'00" West
174.00 feet; thence North 87°43'14" West 187.77 feet; thence
North 78°21'47" West 192.78 feet; thence North 16°31'21" East
45.00 feet; thence North 69°16'07" West 149.22 feet; thence
South 73°43'46" West 67.27 feet; thence North 58°14'S5" West
196.35 feet to the Point of Beginning;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VES1'ED Ii1:
EMMA S. HAWKINS, as her separate property.
EXCEPTIONS:
A. General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if
any, after delinquency; affecting this and other property:
Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due
33541-9004 1985 $1103.51 $0.00 $1103.51
NOTE:
1985 assessed valuation: Land $72,700.00 Improvements $5,400.04 ,
1. SALE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Seller: Emma S. Hawkins, a widow
Purchaser: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E. Bueschke, hus-
band and wife
Dated: April 25, 1975
Recorded: December 3, 1975
Recording No.: 7512030261
Affects: This and other property
2. SAi.E AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AvD CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Seller: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E. Bueschke,
husband and wife
Purchaser: Midilome, Inc., a Washington corporation
Dated: December 1, 1978
Recorded: January 23, 1979 _
Reco rding No.: 7901230265 I
Re-Reco rded: September 10, 1979
Re-Reco rding No.: 7909100429
Affects: A portion of this and other property
(continueci)
l
~
!
Order No. LM-124804M
Page 3
CERTIFICATE TO PLAT
3. SALE AGREEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Seller: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E. Bueschke,
husband and wife
Purchaser: Midilome, Inc., a Washington corporation
Dated: March 1, 1980
Recorded: April 13, 1980
Recording No.: 8104130146
Aff ects: ~ Portion of this and other property
Records examined as to June 5, 1985 at 8:00 A.M.
TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
By. ;ka~~4
Larry attson
Title Officer
p ds
CC: Spokane County Engineering
Spokane County Planning
0
~ , r~. ~ • ~ r -
• . Y' ' F 'f t` ~
2~ ~ ` 1 ~ , ~ • M ~
n► + . , , ~
. . ~r r. ~ o.' • a"
i' ~ ' ~ ~ • • ,
t,ID~~
~ 3+►,~- aC4A
137, P
So
' f ~ {~tii;♦
t ~
~ 't ~ i ~Nis~~ ~ ~ L c# , y
i,~y, J'`o . ' , p• -
ul t"f;~.~~+'4`~ t-4
C^",~ ~
1~ 1 ~ r~ a~h~ F~• r{y v' t
Q„6 a
~ ~ ; ~,~t~' j,.~"I , ; ~ ~
~ ~ti ~ > :,i~ ~ , 4,~,; ~ 4
1 ~!r r` ; "r,~•+'r`~'~~ r~7 .
~ ~ 7~« ~,s~~~k~ C~j'~ e~5' ~ •;r <<,-;y.' _
~ ~ " . ~ , • ~ E,
~ ~ . , ~.t}~~i,{i 1 ~.~~t~ ~'s°~ ~til~~•~ ~ ~ .
7 _ a,4t L, 3t~ r ; ~ , •
~ ~ ~~til K' ,iY ~~jY~`~4 '~~.~';:Ej,~ , ~ 1~ ~
~ ~ ' ~~1 jf'~}~•~ 1~~~t ~ r~~wt t ~
00
~r) ~ { Y ~ r ~ ~ , '
1 t,•j' a,r r. t"' '
I'1~ k:!'' ii•!~ t 4't
1 ~ f t 5) S J_ r, c: c..1 .
~ tf~s+~Y• ,{~t>r>~~.~ t~`',t ~ ~ ~ 1
N~~ry'
` 7 Z ` ~r~► ~ ~ '
. ,
A
T
II Iil
' 113
'
• '.1 0~ ~ ~ ~ :
i6 ~ ° GE COIJIPAKY.
, p~A'ER1CA ~11l.E ►NSU4tA `
1 kA~S
, ~ t24RY H . ~ AR,p'NNE RC)A1J
44206
..~Qp
r ~t' • ~ ,
!Y ' j`~' w,- ' ' ~ • ,
-,w
. s ~ ,~:►g~~~ P ~
~ made solely tof 4e assdtnas to .
(h,s pt~ni t5 ~ ` ~
'n ~a~~n~ Se~ct pram~ses aad ih
" t Vaft8ttuQ5. i1 .anY. In 4~~ns~oas ~ O
+ i~eGilityz~Q af s„rvey V \ ~
' rPita~ni~~t hv a~t1~ ~ G `V
,,t
~
RE CE IV E Dq,
A,U C, 5
Sf OKANE COUnfTY
PLANN6NG D EPA RTM ENTPacific Northwest Bell
August l, 1985
Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Re: Midilome Fourfih Addition
Dear Sir:
Pacific Northwest Bell will require a 71x7' additional
Utility Easement located in the Southeast corner of Lot
8 Block 3 within the above reterenced plat.
Sincerely,
Ed Norris
Right of Way Agent
North 904 Columbus
Spokane, Washington 99202
Phone: (509) 455-2709
cc: Clarence E. Simpson
Engineering Inc.
North 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, Washington 99206
EEN/mw
OF ICE OF ~r{E
Frt ~ ~
.
. , ' .
1 .~.r.•
. • •~41}~''~r4 PI..AN'I INC IEPAR1MF.]NT
. ,
.
,
, .
DrATE June 24. , L%5
. . . ..1• . . . . . ' t: . ,H R - •
i►0«~wt COYw~t ieVQT ~NY~I
Cbunty agirymr; Ut3lities; Iieal.th District;
To. • Hui lding& safety; Assessor
, . ~
FRa"1. Dowlas s. wang - subdtvisian Ac3~u.nistratoac
SLWECT; Aevfew of Final Plat(s)
-
IIwA.osed please find attached oapfes of t3ze proposed final plat for:
1. S~aan Acres 3rd Additian
2. Midilute 4th Addition 3. Mission Ridge 2nd Additican
4. Robinsan Adc3itioal
If yau have any probl.ems with wry of this(eee) project (s) , please let me lcnow
at y+our earliest vonvenienae.
Thanlcs.
UA: dj
Enclroeures r ' 1. Final Plat Map
2. Dedication
3. Plat; Gertificate
4. Assessor's Map
. ~ i ~ , '
Transam lCa T tle Insurance ComPan
Y
Title Services
YOUR LOAN NO.
rTomlinson Agency ,
W. 606 Third MORTGAGOR
re: C to P Midilome 4th Addn
cc: Spokane Engineering PURCHASER
Lcc : Spokane Planning J OUR ORDER NO LM-124804M
~
SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE REPORT
The foliowing matters affect the property covered by this order:
❑ Deed dated and recorded as file No
❑ Contract dated nnd recorded as file No
❑ Mortgage dated nnd recorded as file No
❑ Deed of Trust dated nnd recorded as file No
o _
❑ Paragraph (s) No. of our preliminary commitment is eliminated.
❑ The policy is being issued in accordance with your instructions.
❑ Our inspection of the premises on discloses:
x General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if
any, after delinquency:
Tax Account tdo. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due
33541-9004 1985 $1103.51 $551.76 $551.75
R E C E I V E
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
[2 Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been reexamined.
❑ There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since ,
EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. (date of last reporf)
6a ed as of 1 June 5, 1985
at 8.00 A.M. TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE CO.
BY Larry Mattson ~
~
p ds
Form No W-AK-735 Rev. 12-73
Transa Ica T Transamerica
tle Insurance ComPan
Y
Titie Services
YOUR LOAN NO. ,
rTomlinson Agency ,
W. 606 Th i r d MORTGAGOR ,
re: C to P Midilome 4th Addn
cc: Spokane Engineering PURCHASER
Lcc : Spokane Planning J OUR ORDER NO. LM-124804M
SUPPLEOVIENTAL TITLE REPOttT
The following matters affect the property covered by this order:
❑ Deed dated and recorded ns file No.
❑ Contract dated and recorded ns file No.
❑ Mortgage dated and recorded ns file No.
❑ Deed of Trust dated and recorded as file No.
a
❑ Paragraph (s) No. of our preliminary commitment is eliminated.
❑ The policy is being issued in accordcnce with your instructions.
❑ Our inspection of the premises on discloses:
x General taxes as follows, together with interest and penalty, if
any, after delinquency:
Tax Account ido. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due
33541-9004 1985 $1103.51 $551.76 $551.75
E C E I 7-
JUN 1g 1911,85
SPOKANE COUEtiiY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Except as to the matters reported hereinabove, the title to the property covered by this order has NOT been reexamined.
❑ There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this order since ,
EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove. (date of (ast report)
6 red a of 1 June 5, 1985
at 8.00 A.M. TRANSAMERICA TITIE INSURANCE CO.
By Larry Mattson ~
~
p ds
Form No. W-AK-735 Rev 12-73
. r
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS & ORDER
DATE: April 19, 1985
RE: PE-1168D-79, MIDILOME 4TH ADOITION
ZE-13-78 „ Change of 24 Lots to R-2 zoning.
1. That the proposal i s to cl assi fy 24 1 ots of Mi di 1 ome 4th Addi ti on to
R-2 zoni ng from the previ ously approved R-1 zone.
2. That the proposed R-2 zoning would be situated adjacent and westerly of
Pines Road between 32nd and 40th Avenues.
3. That the item has been properly advertised in accordance with state and
local regulations.
4. That the applicant has requested a withdrawal of the proposal after
determi ni ng that a substanti al number of area resi dents conti nue to
oppose the project.
5. That numerous area residents spoke in support of the withdrawal and
commended the sponsor for withdrawing the proposal.
6. That no decision regarding the merits of the proposal has been reached.
CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER
That the application for Change of Condition for PE-1168D-79, MIDILOME 4TN
AODITION and Zone Change ZE-13-78, Change of 24 lots to R-2 zoning be
WITHDRAWN in accordance with these Findings.
VOTE
2-0 TO WITHDRAW
TNE NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE HEREBY
ATTESTS TO TH YE FINDINGS AND
CONCLUSI ND VO .
~
ai rperso
, 45 a
ATTES
• -
~ 4 ~`1 r,~'
~j s s. Aoms -um
SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
~
~
RECEIPT ' Date--F_tl~ 9855
Received From ~d~ tow.e .'~v.C) -
gdress :4]:T S e~po ~A 6 9 C? ~ ~ .
cLna_j Dol lo rs $ f S t~ Jt~
F o r 1~ ~ sv~-~1 1,A o-Q- F&~ P~--116,~U)- 4e^,'
A OU HOW PAID
AMT Of CASH (
ACCOUNT
AMT PAID I CHECK ✓ ~ B
BAIANCE MONEY
~ DUE I ORDER ~ Y
8K806 Redifp►m
.
i:
. . . ~ _ -.:l~ . ~ . . .
~ '
~ 9 r►+
• r_ . 7 ~ ,
, ~"L~ I --a • • - .;~p~~ ~ ~ ~ . -
1f 1
^ ~ ~ ~ _ • ,r_~ r1~~ Ni "~y" ' _ _ ,
I •.+~era= _ _
f
- " = Z ~ Z! t++M ~
~ ~
~ 2 T N 1 f w
- _ . . _ .
3 T
.
T ~ • ~ ~ ~~~Nf
J
~ 1Lti _ 1 ~ ;a t (
ti ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 T~
.
IL
.
! r 0 r ~ • r/1♦ ~Inlf ~ . C
~ -
~ . CIiT~t1l.r,y~ ■
_ ~ . i . • ► . . .a . . ; t
207zdn~ -
T ' T P•'n e s
+7 w
F . y " r:: • • - ,..a . . ~ N ~ T H ~ S ~ S
~ • T . . . 19 T t ~ Q ~ a -
Q-~~ . . . ~ - - J• ~ ~ \
G~k w~~fw~ C►r[C~! ~ 1~ -
. .T ~ - ST `
Z , _ .
N ~ z 14 o a E ~
.v
I~ \
Z 16 00
~K~ ~
Z
J
otr J~ - Z, ovth• P.i 't s-
T Tn
_ ~ o _ . . _ , . _ , . . . 28 . - u ~ -
0
j • . i - • t .
~ F. ~ •i
T . ~ . >
r ~'s+`~- • ~ i T ~ T
x' '
f . . . ~ , i 7 T 7_
i TTN ~ y _J
IK ATK • O!~ ,1 . ►
.,.r, ~ . - . ~ ~ ~ 28
~ ~ ~4~ -
. ~ - . . . . . , . - . . . ut a'
4 ~ ' ~ 3 '~r •
> y; . a W
;
3
= 7
- ~ 5T z J
t _
Y.
~ - N
32ND
\ .i~/•~. .'Yn ~~'f'f, j'~~a~ _ '•t ' . .L~.~.tl~ J'L~3i' - ~ • ~
. ~ i_ . . ' ~
.•E , r. I• ilE Q•! I+r: I(_ 11.1
\ Rn ~ .:._11 i ~~j~~_, _
3 A bz ' ~
` t -4 /h y `N ; 1` _ ~ .
~ : ~ r ' ~y• •k~ ~ s
~ s'T.y ~ ~ , ~ Cr, . 43~~'
, Q jl !•r..
0 IANG l.~~,Y~
F' l..T~ I'' I C)t]S
7 .`iit.P r - ~.~~T►I .~1VI. j~ ..7:• !'1nT-t'.
_ , ' . • j
~ ~ ~ 1 ' " Q •
' ~ • _ . . _
~ w•,l
6 8 D 7 8
f,
~ ~4 G 'r
1 c~, ~ .
~,~►~,r..
^ 1
SPOKANE COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-970) Section 11.10.230(3) Determination of Non-Significance (ONS)
DETERMINATION OF NON - SIGNIFICANCE "DNS"
FILE NUMBER(S): PE-1168D-78 CHANGE OF CONDITION FOR MIDILOME 4TH ADDITION ,
PROPONENT: Robert Tomlinson/Nike PhilliQs 926-1322
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: To establish (R-2) duplex zoninq alonq the west side of
,
Pines Rd between 32nd & 40th Avenue. The lots in question are a portion of Midilome
4th Addition which is a Qreliminar.y plat within Spokane County. Divided duplexes proaosed.
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, including street address, if any: The proposal includes lots
_Lyinq north of 32nd and south of 40th Avenue. The lots in question f ront on the west
side of Pines Road in Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTh1ENT
OETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not
have a probable significant adverse impact an the environment. An Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision
was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information
on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
RESPONSI6LE OFFICIAL DOUGLAS S. ADAN15
Position/Title - Spokane County Subdivision Administrator Phone -(509)456-2205
Address - Spokane County Planning Oepartment •
North 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, WA 99260
4 _;Afa4,az OATE ISSUEO: .2 SIGNATURE: '
This "DNS" is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this
proposal for fifteen (15) days from the date issued (see above).
COMMENTS MUST 6E SUBMITTED NO LATER TNAN April 17. 1985 by 5:00 P.M.
APPEAL of this Oetermination may be made to the SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING OEPARTMENT,
North 721 Jeff erson, Spokane, WA 99260. This appeal deadline is the same as the
above proposal appeal deadline, being ten (10) calendar days after the signing of
the Findings and Order. This appeal must be written and must be prepared pursuant
specific criteria on offical appeal forms. Contact the above Responsible Official
to assist you with the specifics for a SEPA appeal.
* This "ONS" Form was malled to agencies and departments as noted below.
1. WA State Dept, of Ecology (Olympia)
2. WA State Dept. of Social & Health Services
3. Spokane County Utilities '
4. Spokane County Health District
5. Central Valley School District #356
6. Fire District #1
7. Model Irrigation District #18
8. _-WA State Dept.-of Transportation~~Spokane)
P E 16
18
ENVIRONMENTAL
CHECKLIST
. SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
SECTION 11.10.230(1)
a
.y
SPOKANE ENVIRONI{ENTAL ORDINANCE `
(41AC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
/
Environmental Checklist P E 6 8 D 7 8
File No.
Purpose of Checkliet:
The Sta[e Environmental Policy Ac[ (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCF1, requirea all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal
before making decisions. M Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for nll proposals vith probable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of [he environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacte from your
pcoposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS le required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine
whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information knovn, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to Che best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions
from your own observaCions or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the ansxer, or if a question does not apply
to your ptoposal, vriCe "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete enswcrs to the questions nor+ may avoid uoneceasary dclays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, ehoreline, and landmark designations. Ansver theee questions if you can. If you
have problems, the governmental a6encies can assist you.
The checkliet questions apply to all parte of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcele of land.
Attach any additional information that vill describe your propoeal or its environmental effects. The agency to vhich you submit Chis checklist may
ask you to explain your answers or provide addi[ional information reasonably rela[ed to determining if there may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete thie checkliat for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be ansvered 'does not apply".
IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part D).
For nonproject actions, the re£erences !n the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read ae "propoeal,"
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of propoaed project, if applicable: Mi di 1 ome 4th Addi ti on
2. Name of Applicant: 01 (1i I (),7je & 1 r]c_
3. Address and phone number of epplicant oz contact person: RObert H. Tom.l i nson 6Z4-9131
'Vy. 606 Third Avenue
CDn.~ !cane, Washi natnn 99p(?4
4. Dace checklist prepared: 17I7I R4
5. E►gency requesting checklist: Spokane Countv P1 anni nq
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Sorina - 1985
7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected aith this proposal? If yes, explain.
Yes - conti nuati on of Hi di 1 ome as ori qi nal l,v approved, wi th the execpti on of
, dual ex si te,. .
; .
b. Do you ovn or have options on land nearby or adjacen[ to thie proposal9 If yes, explain.
+ or - approximate 80 acres - ad.iacent
8. Llat any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
QIS was rPO red .f_Q_r__enti~rP nrniPCt by Haworth and Anciersnn in Auaijst_ 1978
" LQ w> .1F i it}
i • ~ ~ ~ ~ • ' ~ ? ~ ~
. ~ ~
: ' - , ~ ~
• . ~ 1 :
~
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) SFORANE ENVIRONlIENTAL ORDINANCE
A. BACKG&OUND (continued)
9. Do you knov vhecher npplications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your
proposa19 If yes, expluin.
. No
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Standard agencies for fornial
approval of plat including but not linlited to Spokane County Planning Crnnmission, D
Spoka& County Enoincers, DSH Services, etc.
11. Give brief, camplete description of your proposel, includiag [he proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several
questione later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspecta of your propoeal. You do not need to repeat those anevers on this
page.
We i ntende to chanae u se alona Pi oes Rd. from si ncje fami V resi dences to 0 1 ot 1 i ne
R-2 type use. This will include approximately 25 duplexes or 50 units. The purpose
is to provide a slightly higher density use along Pines Road, which is a major arterial.
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information to a person to underatand [he precise location of your proposed project, including a
street addrese, if any, and section, township and range. if knovn. If a proposal vould occur over a range of area, provide the range or
boundaries of the site (s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you
ehould submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate mapa or detailed plans suDmitted with any permit application
related to thia checklist.
The location of the proposal is on the west side of Nines Road from 32nd and ruii soutil
to the future 40th.
13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)7 The General Sewer Service Area? 1t►e Priority Sever Service Area9 The
City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries).
ASA and General Sewer Service Area and Prioritv Seti,►er Service Area
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL EL&MENTS
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
1. EARTH
a. Ceneral descrlption of [he sfte (circle one)• Flat, rolling, hilly, s[eep slopes, mountainous,
other:
flat
b. Wha[ is the steepest slope on the site (approximace percent slope)?
n
c. What general types of soils are found on the si[e (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)?
If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Grauel
r>
d. Are there surface indications or hietory of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so,
describe.
,"y'n
V 3
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-960) S@ction 11.10.230(1)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS(continued)
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed.
Indica[e source of fill.
Nomal cuts,/fi 11 "s:- for road on noraial fl at property
f. Could erosion occur as a resul[ of clearing, construction, or use9 If so, generally describe.
Very litt'le due to the flat nature cf the site
g. About what percent of the site vill be covered with impervious surfaces after project construc-
tion (for example, asphalt or buildings)9
20%
. . . - . ~ . ~ ~ .
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control eroeion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
No imact due to lo ts facinq an existing, approved county
arterial, qround relatively flat.
2. AIR
a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., duat, automobile, odors
industrial, w*ood smoke) during construction and when the project ia completed? If any,
generally describe and give approximate quantites if known.
Emission to air would be those normally attributed to
residential use.
b. Are [here any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your pzoposal? If so,
generally describe.
None that we know of ,
c. Proposed measures [o reduce or control emissions or o[her impacts to air, if any:
- I C=T 1TWlth rniinty ani SSinn contro~ - Qnl v those normal
to a residential area
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate viciaity of the site including year-
round and seasonal streams, saltvater, lakes, ponds, wetlanda)? If yes, describe type and
provide names. If appropriate, state whaC stream or river it flowa into.
1YO
(2) Will the project zequire any work over, in, or adjacen[ [o (within 200 feet) the described
waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plane.
No
, ~ ~ ~
~
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) SPORANE BNVI&ONMENTAL ORDINAtr'CE
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELBMENTS (continued)
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
(3) Es[imate the amount of fill and dredge material tha[ vould be placed in or removed from the
surface water or we[lands and indicate the area of [he site that vould be affected. Indicate
the source of fill material.
N/A
(4) Will [he proposal require surface vater withdrawals or diversions? Give general descrip-
tion, purpose, and approximate quanti[ies if known.
No
(S) Does the proposal lie vithin a 100-year flood plain4 If so, note location on the site plan.
No
(6) Does the proposal involve aay discharges of vaste materials to aurface waters? If eo,
describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of dYscharge.
(Jo i ntenti on of di scharqe of waste materi al s
b. GROUN'D.
(1) Will ground vater be withdravn, or vill vater be discharged to ground vater? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
Tris property is currently being served by a package treat-
ment plant now beina oaerated hv Saokane Countv and will
service lst and 4th Additions ±c Midilome.
(2) I?escribe waste material that vill be discharged into the ground from septic tanka or other
eanitary vaste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of
houses to be sezved (if applicable) or the number of pereons the sqstem(s) are expected to serve.
Same as AhrvPS thP thrP_ p phas.p treatmeGt
servicincl the Midilcne Subc'iv;aion ;s desinned to
accomodate 400 + or - units.
(3) Describe any systema, other than those deaigned for the disposal of sanitary waste.
installed for the purpose of discharging fluida below the ground surface (includes sqstems such
as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage fran floor drains). Describe the type of
syetem, the nmount of macerial to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials
likely to be diaposed of (including materiala vhich may enter the system inadvertently through
epilla or as a reault of fire fighting activities).
Lots face an existina; apuroved countv road, adjacent
surface wa"ter_ di scharge' ai'ready provi ded for. -
(4) Will any chemicals (especielly organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above
ground or underground s[orage tanks9 If so, what types and quantities of ineterials aill be
atored?
IYo
.
~
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11 10.230(1) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
B. ENVIROt1A1ENTAL ELEMENTS (continued)
Evalua[ion For
Agency Use Only
(5) ldhat protective measures will be tnken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals
stored or used on eite will not be allowed to percolate to ground water (thie includes measures
to keep chemicals out of disposal systems descrlbed in 3b(2) and 3b(3)?
idone - other than those normal to residential sub-
division
c. Water Runoff (including storm water)
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm vater) and method of collection and dlsposal
if any (include quantities, if known). Where vill this water flow? iJill this water flow in[o
o[her waters? If so, describe.
Stom water disposal alreadv provided, existina approved
arterial
(2)~ Will any chemicals be etored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or
leak vill drafn to surface or ground water or to a stoim water disposal system discharging to
surface or ground water?
No
(3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If eo, generally describe.
N/A
d. Proposed measures to reduce or conCrol surface, ground, and runoff water 4mpacts, if any (if
the propoaed action lies vithin the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especislly clear on eaplanations
relacing~to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checkliat).
See question C-1 abov e
~
4. PLANTS
a. Check or circle [ype of vebetation found on the site:
deciduous tree: aldez, maple, sa{ren, other.
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other.
shrubs.
graes.
X pasture.
crop or grein.
wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other.
water planta: water lilly, eelgrass, milfoil, other.
other types of vegetation.
b. What kind and amount of vegeta[ion vill be removed or altered?
al fal fa rPmovPd and repl aced wi th grass and 1 audscaDi nq--
c. List threatened or endangered epecies known to be on or near the site.
None
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native planta, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetat3on
on the site, if any:
None
. • ~ ~ )
- - - ~
. • ~ , ii
~
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINAtaCE
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued)
Evaluation For
, Agency Use Only
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on
or near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirde, o[her: N o n e
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: « O n e
fish: bass, salmon, traut, herring, ahellfish, other: ~
other: N(11'1P
b. Liat any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
N' (11'1 P
c. Is the site pact of a migration route'? If so, explain.
No
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
Un1lF'
6. ENERCY AND ftATURAL RESOURCES
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood s[ove, eolar) vill be used to meet the
the comple[ed project's energy needs? Describe vhe[her it will be used for heating, manufac-
turing, etc.
Electricitv, natural gas, normal residential use
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by ad,7acent properties? If so,
generally describe.
iVn
c. What klnds of energy conservation fea[ures are included in the plans of [his proposal? Liet
other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
Prone
i
7. eNviROxxECUTai, HEAt.TH
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire
and explosion, spill, oz hezardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so,
describe.
None
,
~
(1) Describe special emergency services that mlght be required.
None
SPOKANE ENVIRONltENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
B. ENVIBONMENTAL ELEMENTS (con[inued)
~ Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazarde, if any:
None
b. Noise:
(1) What tyQes of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example traffic,
equipment, operation, other)
PJnrma1 traf fiCP an d sr hon Jc an p i n e s Rd
(2) What types and levels of noise vould be created by or sssociated with the project on a
short-term or a long-term basie (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other? Indicate
vhat hours nolae would come from the site.
Those normal to residential usP - long, term
Those normal to construction - short term
(3) Propoaed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
nstnirtinn durina normal ho~jr.,,
8. LAND AND SHORELIEVE USE
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
1 tI l Y`P
b. Has the sice been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
Yes - hay production
c. Describe any structures on the site.
Wel 1 hou se
d. Nill any structures be demolished4 If so, vhich'
14QY1P
e. What is the current zoning clasaification of t~e? • _
Rgriculture suburban
f. What is the curren[ campreh nsive plan designation oE the site?
.
. ' ,~!,a,~ ./-./7,c~►~~s~- ~-c~
Urban
g. If applicable, vhat ie the current shorellne master program designation of the site?
N/A
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally aensitive" area? If so,
specify.
No
i. Approximately how many people aould reside or vork in the completed project?
125
, . , ~
g'
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL OBDINANCE
8. ENVIRONMENTAL ELBMENTS (continued)
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
J. Appzoximately how many people would the completed project displace? rJo n e
k. Propoaed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: rd/ A
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible vith eaisting and projected land usea and
P~ane.'if anY: , 4
Architecural control of constuction, through covenants
and architecural control committee
9. HOUSING
a. Approximately hov many units would be provided, if any2 Indicate vfiether high, middle, or
low-income housing. ,
50 units
b. Approximately hov many units, if any, vould be eliminated9 Indicate whether high, middle,or
lov-income housing.
PJone - middle income housing
c. Proposed measurea to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None
10. AESTHETICS
a. What is [he tallest height of any proposed structure (s), not including antennas; vha[ is the
principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
TWn -,t(1 Y' 1 P C
Wood - masonar.y
b. What vievs in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obetruc[ed?
Onl V n S e i nm ecl i a tp 1T v ariiacent by narma 1:oCl st rU : t 1aIZ
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
11. LIGRT AND GLARE
a. What [ype of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
tdnrmal raSidPntial liahtina, aftar ark
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No
c. Whet existing off-sice sources of light or glare may affecc your proposal?
f4nYIP
d. Proposed measures to zeduce or control light and glare impacts, iF any:
.
None
BPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE ~
(WAC 197-11-960) Sec[ion 11.10.230(1)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELBtiENTS (continued)
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
12. RECREATION
a. What designeted and informal recreational opportunities are in the immedlately vicinity?
T4vo sciiool vards irrufledi atel y across Pi nes
Park on fdortheast corner
b. Would the proposed project displace any exieting recreational usee? If so, describe.
IV 0
c. Proposed measures to reduce or contzol impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities
to be provided by the project or applicant, if any•
None
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or obsects llated on, or proposed for nationel, statc, or local preaerva-
tion registers knovn to be on or next [o the site7 If so, generally describe.
No!'1 P
b. Generally describe any laRdmarks or evidence of historic archaeologlcal, aclentlfic or cultural
importance known [o be on or neat to the site.
None
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highvays serving the site, and describe pzoposed access to the
existing street system. Shov on si[e plane, !f any.
Annrnved pijblir_ road on Pi~s serves propertv and
adjacent areas
b. Is eite curreatly served by public trenai[? If not, what is the approximate dietance to the
neareat traneit stop?
STS on 32nd
c. How many parking spaces vould the completed project have? How many vould the project eliminate?
Ac. nPPrfPd - normal residential use
d. iJill the propoeal require any nev roads or atree[s, or improvements [o existing roads or streets
not including driveways? If so, generally deacribe (indicate whether publlc or privete).
ido ne
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air traneportation?
If so, generally deacribe.
N0
/
i
~ ~ .
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
(WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1)
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued)
Evaluation For
Agency Use Only
f. How many vehicular trips per dey would be generated by the completed project7 If knovn,
indicate vhen peak would occur.
Un known a.0-t, 4~ Ld& g. Proposed meaeures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
PJone
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the projec[ result in an increased need for public servicea (for example: Fire protection,
police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally deacribe.
As it relates to 50 new residenti.al un'ts i~
~ • . . .
b. Proposed meaeures to reduce or control dlrect impacts on puDlic services, if any:
Pdone
16. UTILITIES
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse
service, telephone, sanitary sewez, septic system, other.
All
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and
the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be
needed.
A11 above to be orov i ded
General construction needed to provide services and
construct units
C. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, svear under the penalty of perjury the[ the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also
understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the aRency may withdraw any
determination of nonsignificance that it might iesue in reliance upon this checklist.
Date. 1 2/10/84 Proponent I'1 i d i l ome , I nc .
(Please Print or Type)
Proponent: Edgar Bueschke '00, Address: W. 606 Thi rd Avenue, Spokane, Washi ngton ~
Phone. 624-9131 /.I 99204
Person completing fo~ dgar Bueschke Date: 12/10/84
Phone: 624-9131
/
POR STAFF USE OPILY P E 1168DIS
~
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklisc•
Base is staff review of the envizonmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff:
A. Concludes Chat there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of noasignificance.
B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends e mitigeted deter-
mination of nonsignificance vith conditions.
C. Concludes that there are probeble significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends e determination of significance.
FILING FE8 - $75.00
A
i
^
I
iir:
fi. a .
r a
•1{ F ' ' ~ ^ t ` I " t
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET
~PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
` r,.;t. : "r-. .;t-I-c.s` . . E,•`'`'r'' SPOKANE COUHTY COURT MOUSE
BEFORE THE SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
IN THE MATTER OF )"En rD 4? NOTICE OF CANCELLATION
(CHANGE OF CONDITIONS IN THE OF PUBLIC HEARING
M ~l~A&MM)
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner
Committee that the applicant, &&d mop&n" ,
with respect to the above-captioned public hearing, has withdrawn their
application. Accordingly, the public hearing scheduled for 9:00 A.M.
or as soon as possible thereaf ter, on AgPISRk~~Y _,2Ilr- , 1985, in
the Broadway Centre Building located at North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane,
Washington, is hereby CANCELLED.
The Hearing Examiner Committee will not take any action on this matter
on this date. The proposal is scheduled to be heard in -ApRa. ,1985.
The questions concerning this notification should be directed to
Douglas Adams, Spokane County Subdivision Administrator -(456-2205).
~
~
Dated this Ar day of 45 , 1985.
OUGLAS S. ADAMS
Subdivision Administrator
,
-
SPOTANEE COIINTTT EN9iROAltEA7'AL OADINANCE
IWAC 19'7- i I-9701 Sectlon 1 1 I0.230f31 Determinat9vn of NonSignificanrt (DNS)
DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE -'DNS'
FILE NUMBER(S): PEOP ~ F Camp. MumME
PROPONEN'1': 1?0j3&__qT. s U&43g2.
DESCRIPTION o[ proposal:
n
~
44
rw t ~
ids( • . h
~
jv6smj Of-
leyme
.10= ool 44,0 - J~~' /~I • Ot ~ •
00
• ' / . ` •
I.OCA'T10N of proposal, including street address. it any:
_ ,
_~ZL jaetw __.,W .
JAAe ~ . .
. • .
~
~
3
,
LEAD AGE.NCT : 5PANK~Vir CDUNly~i~JAW1itJFr DF09RTA'1SNT ,
,
DETERMINATION : The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it dces not
have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. Aa Eavironmental
impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was `
made after reviear of a completed environmental checklist and other infamation on flle
apith the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
RESFONSIBLE OFF1C1 AL: Pa~ A DAMS +
Position/Title DC4u1VTy Susz) v. AP)W& Phone .509 6-2-2 D5
Add« s$ Coo"T PA")"6 . 2 1WA. 99z 60
Dite lssued: SiGNATURE
This 'D?~S" is i ~ued under 197-1 1-340(2); the lead agency i!1 not act on this proposal Cor 15 days from the date issued (see above)
Commeats must be submitted no tater tbin of bY S PM. _F45 Q--A f!f!~!lilst~~/ftl~s~~~1t/f/!f~l~slslS~Sft~lt!!S=ffflsfs~lf=St1S!/~~Rt~~l~~s~slSf
APPEAL o[ this determination may be made to SPOKANE QOUN'IY PLANNING DEPT.,
ti.721 Jef[erson. Spokane. OG A 99260. This appeai deadiine is the same as the above
proposal appeal deadline. being 10 calender days aftec the signing of the Findings &
Order This appeal must be written and must be prepated pursuant specific cxiteris on
officcal appeal forms. Contact the above responsible a[[iciii to assist you with the
specifics for a SEPA appeal.
~ This "DNS" Form was mailed to agericies and departments as noted on the attachment. f
~
Y ~~IL~NG LIST
, .
1, (28. ) WA Stete Dopartment of Ecalogy (OIympia)
• (29.) WA 5t,ete Dapartment of Eca1ogy (Spokane)
(45.) WA 5tete Dept. of 5oacial & Heelth Services
(53.) Spokane Caurrty Mealt.h District
C } Schvoi District C V
Fire DIstrict
''~ater Dl~trict I:IrrI
8. (~ffi~ce of the I~ay'or (CitY of Spoane)
°
~i'1~~ C3
. g. (so, ) Spokarae County Boundary Review Boar'd .
10, (62.) Spokane City Plan Cammission . ~
. 11. (42.) WA State Parks & Recreation Comm. (Ulympia)
12, (41.) W,A. SLate Dep#. of Natural Resources (Coivilte)
13. (36.) WA State Dept. of Game (Spokane)
14. (16. ) U. S. HC)us1ng & Urban Developnnent (Spokane)
15. (4'9N ) Spokane County Air Pollution C+antroi Authorityr
<:Jj~> (47.) WA St,ate Dept. o# Transpor#,atian (Spokane)
17. (11.) Fairchi1d Air Force Base Commander's Qffiee ~
18. (102.) Spakane International Airport, ATTN: Airports Otreetor ,
19. (129.) fiovwn of Airway Fietights
20. (130.) City o# Ch+eney ;
21. (131.) City► of Deer Park
22. (134.) Town of Medical Lake :
23. (135.) Town of Mi I I woot# ~
EN 3-C
+
c?
F i1 e No. "9D~
~
The Environmenta 1Cheek1 i st and Dec1 arat i on Form was mai 1 ed tv the above
ag+encies/departments circled in REa. -
~
~ S1gP6atllT"@ It e
• EXHIBIT B
~ . .
~
~
`
pREI,IMINARy PId~T AP ICATIQN FORM
E
AI.L SIGNAT(TRE BLOCKS (OiV PAGES 2 AND 3) MUST BE FIIaLID IN, IF APPROPRIATE, BEFCRE RMJRNING
TO TSE PLAT ADMINISTRAT4R.
Part I- To be completed by applicant and surveyor •
AREA AND DISTANCE**~*~~s**~~~~***~s*#***:~**~*s**s#s******~~~****~**~*~~*****~***~s*****~#s*s*s~
Total amount of land in this Subdivision: Acres Total Number of Lots
Tots/Gross Acre
Proposed density of the Plat:
Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or eponsor: PIO Acres
Proposes Use of controlled adjoining land: P.esidential Subdivision
What is the driving di stance in miles to the nearest fire station? one half ~:lile
Shopping facilities? one t-,i 1 e Municipal Boundary: fourics Paved street or
aighway - 0 - ?
LAND USE**~**~***s****s*~*#ss~**~*~sss**s*s*sss~*s~**#***~~*s:*~*~**s*#s~~s**ssr**~**r~****#**s*~*
Comprehensive Plan Category:
Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings (
I}uplexes ( X). Indicate lots for duplexes:
Multi-family dwelling units ~ Indicate whi ch lots:
Mobile Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses:
Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: INI/A
what is the present use of the property proposed to be platted?
List type of uses: Cultivated land: X acres. Pasture: acres.
Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres
Is keeping of animals desired? No ( X). Yes( Type:
Pro osed Zoninq• P,-2
***s*s~s~s• *:~*s:* *~**~***~~*s***~s**s****s****~**ss~*4*s*****~es*s*~*s**~*~y~
IMPROVR4ENTS**
Do you plan to fi.le the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi-phase deve--
lopment? enti ret,-r r.
To what level of improvement wi11 streets be constructed? Gravel ( Minimwn, '
Curb and Gravel ( Curb and Paved Paved only ~
Describe any combinations of above: What is the time period expected for complete development of tbe Plat: SprinY 19S5
Street improvements completed? c1one . Substantial number of lots occuDied? ;-~id 12,$-5-
Is dedication af any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.)
No. ( x Yes ( Describe:
+
Indicate the size of units proposed zo be canstructed: - 1#Z00 sq. ft. each unit Square feet
Number of bedrooms 2PluS • Estimated Sale Pri-ce $55,000 each iriit .
Will bui.ldings be built on tne lots be * ore they are sold : No (X Yes (
Will any speeial deed restrictior_s be included in the sale oi lots'' No Yes (
If "yes", explain: UTILl~C F # x x * i ~ x # ~ i ~ i: z K ac { ~ :a F K K e x : R e r s « ~ s ; * 4 t n ► ik # x M t : ~ ac tk r. ~ .t !ic Y- 4 Y M ? M a ~e x M Ie + x y-. # : ► * r s . s W !r ~ -r .i-.
Z 11'~7 I
Indicate the proposed method oi sewage disposal: Septic tariti l L~,~oon ( i.
Treatment pla.nt ( x)o Other, or combinations (Describe)
Indi cate the proposed source off 1'i2 tP r s.lrrly: Indivi dual well -s-( Publ ~ c system
Private community system ( i.
Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellin.gs):
(Indergtound utility easements ( X). Overhead utility easements (
Utilities in str.eets ( No easements (
Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water cnain: adyjacent feet
Indicate size of ne~.rest main: 12 inches inches.
-OVER-
A
.
E X H I B I i A
PRELIMINARY FLAT APPLICATION FORri (Continued) page Z U=ITIES ~LOIItiIlUe~~♦*•r~r~r*~***s~**r***~s~:r*~.***ss*s**~***xs*~*#*s~*#**~sss~*s****s*t~~s
List utility compa.nies or dr.stricts expected to provide service to this Plat :
Electricity: Inland PawertiGas: Inland Power Water: 'lodel irriga,;;ior: ghanp;
AVi11~O TS*~F+~*i~M##~MS#Y **~t*#~t~Msa~ s*#s~+~R~RM~~###~R#*~#~R~~M*t~**~R~~*~ s~syc~c M sc~lcs * yc** t+s*,~ *sYSs
PROPaSED PLAT NAME : 11 i d i l oj;;e 4th Ad:1 i t i o n
I, the uadersigned, have comnleted the infonnation requested, and the Preliminary Plat has
been prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane
County ent and the laws ISAtteeg 'ngtin.
r
wasN (Signed) ~ Date
(Address) IV." i
~ 40 . Phone: 41I~~
176 78 ~
.c .
Zi p :
~f qFGrST~.4E~ ~a~ .s`
~~~NA N4 S~
SUEVEYO •
I, the undersigned, 'swea.r under the penalty of per jury that the above responses are
raade truthfully and to the best of my kaowledge. I further swear that I AM '''SE OWNER OF
RECORD of tha site proposed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here-
with is writtea permission from said'owner authorizing my actions on his or her behalf.
I also understand, should there be a.ny willful misrepresentation or willflul lack or full
disclosure on my part, Spoka.ne County may withdraw any declaration of non sigaificance
that it might issue ia relia.nce upon this checklist.
(Signed) ~Date : 14)AC - ~
(Address) phone. G '7
zip:
0^LARY ~
~ Gc.: 'Date : , . - ti
L 7
NOTAFtY SEtLL :
.a+~s*ss» n•n u, .~k tt:*ssse*=♦ ass:sasrssassssats*=t~.sUe»cik «st ss#:~s•s~1ka~as*~tk~s~efist*iNSSst~~t4rY•:*ss.=
Part II - to be completed by water nurveyor See PART VI
A. This subdilrisioa (is) ('r situa.ted within cur ser,r_ce a.reao
B. We are (able) ( ) and wil.ling to supply tr.-s suoci:-vision with ade.quate watar ~or
(domestic) (fire) (iadustri al) (commercial) uses.
C. Satisfactory arrangeoaent (nave) (have • been made ~o Ser ve 4his nr-_-~~osa10
D. Signature (only when items A, B& C are true and compl.eted)
E. Priva e(wells (water system) is (approved) (denie as an interim water source.
6dDCt' ' s r g
purveyors name signat e•and title date
a~~iRi~i1~~~*!~M*~~*M*~k**iik#*MRi*~Mk~#tf~~cM**y~tlt+►M~!**st~**s*Ic*ss!*si~css+i~iR*RsRiIcac~siMKS~ss~i~*sssalc
Part III-to be comnleted by Health Di trict ~
,
A. Health District staff has completed a field investigation of
B. Healt!ir-Jistrict rQquirements for -ireliminaz-1 ^lats have ( not; ~0ee ll sa-~:.s-"_e-d.
C. Signa e ~
*s:ia: ~re#an d ie
StR i~~~*yt{t7tMt~Mf~r*Ic~yilyttR~*M~*~#ttM*~t*#t#yt#K~s~~a!lY~+ar1~ls~tr~f«i~*f*Mi**e
~ ti'--
"
` ' • ' ~ ~
,lM
~
. . •
. `
E X H I B I T A
PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM
(Continued) Page 3
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Part IV - To be completed by County Engineers Office
A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plats have (have
not) been satisfied subject to submission and approval of drainage
calculations and drainage plan,
B. Signature
.
J
'oe
~ Sig ture and Title Date
U
~r 7k * * * * * 7k * * * * * * * '7F * ~t 7k * k 7k * * * ~t * * * 7t * * yt * * 7k
Part V- To be completed by County Utilities Dept.
A. County Utilities Department requirements for preliminary plat hz-ap
(have not) been satisfied,
B. Signature
.
!tu 1Z
% ;;!!A-
Signr and Title Date
;
* ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Part VI - To be completed by County Building E Safety
A. Fire Flow of gallons per minute required for proposal.
signature and title date
J. * j
THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNINT DEPARTMENT
Planning Department Information
.
D a t e S u b m i t t e d: 0 / Qif/ P~r-ea 4-w~ F e e: 7~ o ~Date Accepted : 14W . ,300 i 1a I/ Checkl i st Fee : 7
0(
Plat Fi 1 e tJo: L~ 10 --ZE Zone Change Fi 1 e No:
P1at Name: ♦ ~ Existin Zonin :
~it~ LQ/rrt 9 9
Number of Lots :Da te Es tabl i s hed : lis-I
Locati on : Sec. 3.9 T2,5- R Adverti sed Zone Change :
School District: ~ Checked by: A/t^w
Fi re Oi'strict:
Water D i strict: -wQbgt. 12RJIGA 14
Comp. Plan Category:
&XASA AJ
PSSA bdry: PU6L I C HEAR I NG DATE : rCL V
P E . 1 168J78
~
,s-n!
• - ~
6
C - 8D a
PREL IMINARY PLAT' CONF ENCE CHECKL TST
(Return this sheet with the Application)
Da te of Conf erence : ?J' ~ f/~
,
Sec: 37_-) Twnship:_2,5- Range:
Total Acres: No.of Lots:
Proposed Plat Name:
General Location:
VI LDwl
APPLICANT'S NAME: CONTACT PERSON: ~
ADDRESS: PHONE: ,9ij-lr /_3
ZIP: PHONE:
The following documents shall be submitted prior to acceptance by the Planning Department
for hearing by the Hearing Examiner Comnittee, explained in detail on the information
requirements hand-out sheet: *
- FULL PREL IMINARY PLAT FEE -4-$ . , /-1-ot) 7.5
, - PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE , ee R equired-T-
~
1. PLAT APPLICATION (EXHIBIT A) (All signature blocks complete)
~ . LEGAL DESCRIPTION (EXHIBIT B) (Signed surveyor's stamp)
4L
' 3. ENG I NEERS SECT ION MAP ( 3~) ( EXH I B IT C) (Property drawn i n~-r..e4)
` 4.) ASSESSORS SECTION MAP 4 (EXHIBIT D) (Property drawn in red - show
th r owned or o tioned land
P )
. N
i 5 ZO ING MAP (With property drawn in r d and si9ned surveyor's stamp
to be mailed to sponsor'with this ~.orm)
/
6. PRELIMIPJARY PLAT MAPS (7) (EXHIBIT E) (Even scale required)
a. 2 ~vEKLINE COPIES
b. 4 ~LINE COPIES
-
c. 1 B~KLINE OR BLUELINE COPY WIT SIGNATUR B OCKS F4R COUNTY
EIEALTH, ENGINEERS APJD UTILITIE -
7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS ( EXH IB IT F)
al. SEWAGE STUDY REPORT (Provide 3 alternatives)
a2. WATER SUPPLY REPORT (Required for wells or new water service)
b. STORM WATER DRAINAGE PLANS (If required by Engineers)
c. LANDSCAPING PLANS (Required when land use conflicts might occur)
d. ROAD PLANS AND PROFILES (If re b Engineers)
/08- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST (EXHIBIT G) 0 0'Fee Required)
- - - - - - - - - - - -STAFF REVIEW PROPOSAL- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A. UNIQUE ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES:
B. CULTURAL RESOURCES: C. AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY:
1-~ D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
27
E. COMMENTS: ~j 9-~, ~
~ J
0 a t e: J?D,
laL Act`min'strator
. . ,
r
PRELIMINARY PLAT rNFAfENCE CHECKLIST
(Return this sheet with the Application)
Date of Conference:
Sec: 372-Twnship:Range: ~CL}-
Total Acres: No.of Lots:
'Proposed Plat Name:
6eneral Location:
`~..APPLICANT'S NAME: CONTACT PERSON•:•ADORESS: . PHONE: L&LL2j,
3 Z Z-
ZIP: PHONE: . The following documents shall be submitted prior to acceptance by the Planning Depar trnent
for hearing by the Heari ng Exami ner Con~ni ttee, expl a i ned i n detai 1 on the i nformati on
requirements hand-out sheet: ~
- FULL PRELIMINARY PLAT FEE . , _ 7S
, - PROPOSED ZONE CHAN6E C$2 . ee R e q u
fr e~''
~
1. PLAT APPLICATION (EXNIBIT A) (All signature blocks complete)
. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (EXHIBIT B) (Signed surveyor's stamp)
` 3. ENGINEERS SECTION MAP (.3) (EXHIBIT C) (Property drawn in,,#~)
4. ASSESSORS SECTION MAP ~(EXHIBIT D) (Property drawn in r&~ - show
th r owned or optioned land)
5. ZONIN MAP w '
G ( i th prope t drawn i n r d and signed surveyor s stamp
to be ma il ed to sponsor wi th thi ~rm)
6. PRELIMIMARY PLAT MAPS (7) (EXHIBIT E) (Even scale required) I
a. 2 KL I N E C 0 P I E S
b. 4@t~El I NE COP I ES O.
c. 1-B~'rKLINE OR BLUELINE COPY WIT SIGNATUR B OCKS FOR COUNTY
NEALTH, ENGINEERS AND UTILITIE
7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS (EXHIBIT F)
al. SEwAGE STUDY REPORT (Provide 3 alternatives)
a2. WATER SUPPLY REPORT (Required for wells or new water service)
b. STORM WATER DRAINAGE PLANS (If required by Engineers)
c. LANDSCAPING PLANS (Required when land use conflicts might occur)
d. ROAD PLANS AND PROFILES (If re b Engineers)
8. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST (EXHI6IT G) (s0 0'Fee Required)
- - - - - - - - - - - -STAFF REV I EW PRO POSAL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
A. UNIQUE ENYIRONMENTAL FEATURES:
. .
B. CULTURAL RESOURCES:
~
. ,
C. AGRICULTURAL SUITABILITY,:_--
~ D. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
E. COMNIENTS :
1 ~
C~ m
DateJZl~ O
~ - .
lat A in'strator
,
~ ~
~ ~ ~ R : ~
~ ~ 1 #FW
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. }
~
~ ~ , ~
. ~ t- . . , /
~ r ~
r~
~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r .i.~ ~ ~ ~ . _ ~ + ? ~ ~ _..~~_sc•• ~ ~ 'i~ r~~ ~ ~ ► • ~
~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ _ _ _ f1 ~L! df. ~ L~ - - - , - ~ _ • - +k 7r ~ d /~'~a _ _ -_"7 _ ~P.Ac - ~ T s_~wa a~.~ - ~ ~ .7
_ d~.,,,, ~ ~ a.~ ~ ~~Y ~ , ~ 1 i ~ `,~i►o
~ "i ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ i ~ ~ ~ k- - -
h ~ , ~ l r. f
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ I ~
I Y ` ~ 8
` " ~ a a ~1 0
► j, 0
. , . , _ _ - ~ ~ I , , , h
~ ~ c] H ~ ~ . ~ ti
i ; i~
1 I ~ ~ ~ h
~ ~ ~ , ~t rz~t a~ ~r e _ r ~ia7
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !
~ I~ ~ I I I f
i ~ ~
! ~ I - - - - ~ ~ ~ _ ~ - ~ ~ ~ , _ ~ ~
~ a ~ 0 ~ ~ ti
1
~ I ,
fi ~ f ~ ~
~3z~ az clD~Y 1~fA~2JE
Jt~Y I~A~I ~ ~ . , i
~ ~ ~ . ! ~ ~
~ i 1 y~ ~ ~ s 1 , i ~ ~
~ w ~ ~
. ~ 7 ~
~3~ ^ ' ry ~4
6~8 - '
* ; ~ • ~ _ , ~
~ ~ t~ ~
~ ~x _
~ 9{) rh' ~ ~ -~A , ~ 1_ ~ ~r>
o ~ rrs o x]! 4o t ~ ~ r........ ~ ~ r... rs~ ~a L~t ~y0
i 4 ~ ~ ~ ti + Q 44: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ 1 ~4~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y M
~ ~ ~ ~ V ~ w NA,
4 ~ ~ ~ a ~ 3 i ~ ti~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~ , ~ r~o ~~o ~ ~ ~
~r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~Q ~ ~ o ~ Ii! 7] ~ ~ ~ ~ . A E y.~ ~ P ~ w ~s. I ~ ~1~~~} ~ ~
f~i w ~ ~ ~ ~i. ia ~ f air. 2~ 7~ r~~T'^ ~ ~ y ~ _ ~q '
.G' a 1{ J * + ~I ' ~ ~ ! Y ' ~ _ d 24A r ~ %
~ - rl► ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ x~ ioD ~ ~h I d~ , • ~ af' r i ~`~,~;u'b.;., ' j ~ 'q"
,f: _s,ti•~ • 7 ~ .7~ ,n, .5 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ 4'~., • 'i~~'••. 'r}=, ' . '~p 0` ~ vs ~3 •
" F~`- ' " r ~ • 'Y 9P ~ ~I .1v~.~~',`r-= -6 1~ ~ ~ ~ 'V ev II .r i . ~ ~ Q ~!F + ~ ~ i h e I w ~ ~
~ r .
~ -
, 4
No. 85085$
AMEMID MIAL PIAT RESQ=ON
-BEMPE TE BOMD QF COLNTY OCiMMISS?LVEFtS 0W SIXZAm OOiwY, WA.SHINGZW
PE-1168D-78 & ZE-13-78
IN THE MTIF.R QF FII.ING TfE FINAL )
PLAT CF MIDIILY~ FOUM AIaDITICN )
A N ID Z 4 N E FEQA.SSIFICATICN FROM ~ R E S O L U T I O N
AGRICULTLMAL TO R-1 IOCAZED IlN )
SDCrICN 33, ZCJfnNSHIP 25N, RANGE 44 )
E.W.M., SP'QKANE COLNI'Y, ing1SHI3GPCN )
BE IT FESCILVED BY 'IHE BOAM QF QOLN'I'Y OCMISSIINEfi.S QF SPMM OOLINI'Y,
WASFINGICN, that the Final Plat of
Mrnnrw~ 4TH ALIDITICN
that portion of the Northeast quart~,r af Sectian 33, T'owrsship 25N, Rarxge 44 E.W.M.,
des cri.bed as f ollvws :
LiEG1.M1NG a L t! tie sou th Carner oi Wt l, Block 5, M1ULLA)hiL•' 'li illZU
ADOITIC21, as per plat thereof reoorded in Volume 17 of Plats,
page 10; &enve, the next 9 vaurses along the easterly line of
said TMRD ADDITIGIN, I3arth 36' S6' 18" Fast 135.00 feet;, thence
North 52° 00' 37" East 62.28 f t; thenoe Nnrth 35056' S2" East
250 . 00 f eet; thence North 19' 2 S' 11" Eas t 52.32 f t; thence
rlorth 37016 159" East 36 . 45 f t; thence rlorth 54009 '24" East
155.00 f t; therLOe North 71' 19' 42" East 155 . 72 f t; thence
North 07 ° 52' 24" West 125 . 94 f t. to a point on a curve oonc,ave
to the Southeast with a rad.ius of 608.392 ft. a radi.al bearir~g of
Narth 07' S2' 24" West and a oentral anglre of 4° 53' S3"; thence
Westerly along the arc, 52.01 f t. to the East line of MIDIIGM
SECOND ADOITION, as per plat thereof reoorded in Volune 16 of
- plats, page 78; thence North 00026' 00" West, aLong said East
line, 505.06 ft. to the south line of 32nd Averwe; thence
South 89 • 47' 00" East alonq said South line, 500.04 f t. to the
West line of Pines Road; thence South 00' 27' 00"East along sa.id
West lirtie 1405.34 ft; therjoe South 890344000 West 150.42 f t; thenoe
Sauth 00' 26' 00" Esst 45.00 ft; thence South 89' 34' 00" West 174.00 ft;
thenoe N 67043' 14" ilest 187.77 ft; thence N 78°21' 47"Slest 192.78 ft;
thence North 16' 31' 21" Eas t 45.00 f t; thence North 69' 16' 07" Wes t
149 . 22 f t; thence South 730431460 West 67.27 f t; theryoe t3orth
58' 14' S5" west 196 . 35 f t. to the Foint of Beqinninq;
Situate in the Cauity of Spokane, S tate of Washington
more precisely descri.bed in the plat dedication, on the r ndation af the
Spokane County Hearing Examiner Cammittee, be, and the same hereby is approved,
with the exoeption that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not
until the Cownty E7ngineer has oertified
be established for mainterarx,e rvirposes
that the roads have been imprwed to Caunty standard-z and approved by a separate
resolution af the Hoard of County Caaniss ioners .
PASSID BY TFIE BM2D TIiIS J?, rAY QF , 19 86 .
BOAF2D OF aC~NiISSICi~RS
QF S ,
_ r
•
ATI'FST:
E.
f the
8Y ,
.
r
No. 86 0325
BEFQRE 'I'I-E BOARD OF OOtRI'Y COMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE 00[JN'I'Y, WASHING'I'ON
PE-1168D-78 & ZE-13-78
IN THE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL )
PLAT OF MIDILOME FOURTH ADDITION )
/ J A N D ZONE RECLA.SSIFICATIQN F R O M ~ R E S O L U T I O N
R-1 te--R-~-, IACATID IN SECTION 33, )
TOWNSHIP 25N, RANGE 44 E.W.M., )
SPOKANE COLTNTY, WASHINGTON )
SE IT RESOLVED BY Tf-E BQARD OF COIJN'rY G014MISSIONERS OF SPOKANE OOUNI'Y,
WA.SHINGI'ON, that the Final Plat of
MIDII4M 4TH ADDITION _
that portion of the Northeas t quarter of Section 33, Tawnship 2 5N , Range 44 E. W. N.
described as follaws:
HEGINNING at the south corner of Lot l, Block 5, MIDILGIME THIRD
ADDITIOV, as per plat thereof recorded in Voltmae 17 of Plats,
page 10; thenoe, the next 9 courses along the easterly li.ne of
said THIRD ADDITION, North 36°56118" East 135.00 feet; thenoe
North 52°00' 37" East 62.28 ft; thence North 35056' S2" East
250.00 feet; thence North 1902811111 East 52.32 ft; thence
Pdorth 37°16'S9" East 36.45 ft; thence North 54°09'24" East
155.00 f t; thence North 7101914211 East 155 . 72 f t; thence
North 07°52'24" ivest 125.94 ft. to a point on a curve concave
to the Southeast with a radius of 608.392 ft. a radial bearing of
North 07 ° 52' 24" 6Vest and a central angle of 4053' S3" ; thence _
Westerly along the arc, 52.01 ft. to the East line of MIDILC?NIE
SEOOND ADDITION, as per plat thereof reoorded in Voluine 16 of
Plats, page 78; thence North 00°26'00" West, along said East
line, 505.06 ft. to the south line of 32nd Avenue; thence
South 89°47'00" East along said South line, 500.04 ft. to the
6aest line of Pines Road; thence South 00°27'00"East along said
Vlest line 1405.34 ft; thence South 89°34'00' West 150.42 ft; thence
South 00°26'00" East 45.00 ft; thence South 89°34'00" West 174.00 ft;
thenoe N 87°43' 14" tiiest 187.77 ft; thence N 78021' 47"4dest 192.78 ft;
thence North 16031' 21" East 45.00 ft; thence North 6901610711 tVest
149.22 ft; thence South 73°43'46" West 67.27 ft; thence North
58°14'S5" west 196.35 ft. to the Point of Begi.nning;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington
more precisely descri.bed in the plat dedication, on the reomunendatian of the
Spokane County Hearing Examiner Ccmnittee, be, and the same hereby is approved,
with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not
be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified
that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate
resolution of the Board of County Canudssioners.
-
PASSED BY THE BQARD THIS /DAY ~ OF , 198~t
BOARD OF OOiIlNTY C4MISSIOIIER.S
OF S CO NG'TON
~
~
~
OL
. •
A'ITEST :
WILLIAM E. DONAFiLlE
C f the Board
BY=
, . - - -a-=- - -
NZO SPECIALTIES, BOX 6.8 ENDICOTT N Y 1376C~
~ Fold at Gvide Mark fo Mail in Window Envolope. vECOIsErp MooWc eusINtss roaMs wc r
~ • _~_'.~'"'_''•v .
~ F T II~,~II~ AGENCY, INC.
1
R
0
Mr. John Nunnery
, S okane Count Plannin De artment ~ ~ 1
P Y 9 p M
1414,
co
N ,4` -
SUBJECT OATE
RE: Niidilome, Inc. 2nd Addition Sa~~~1G 4/27/83
! ' F
FOID MESSAGE Q1►''
' -
w: Please find enclosed originals and copies of the following:
. .
~ Copy of completed Notice of Action
Original affidavit of mailing
Affidavit of Posting - Original
Affidavit of Publication - Original
. If you need any other items, please let me know.
Sincerely,
.
ORIGINATOR-DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE REPI.Y TO SIGNED ~ Max ne BaCh an
!
REPLY miai7ome, inc.lTomiin5on r'fige-Y`cy
1
~ f
1 i f A
P ' ' P ~ ~jiy r 1 D
~2 1 r
DATE ~ SIGNEO
r
r 4p
r~
; ~ SEND WHITE AND PINK COPIES WITH CARBONS INTACT. PINK COPY IS RETURNED WITH REPIY,
s ` i ' , ~ rt ~ ~ ~ - i ~
J b .
y L
~ . ~ ~ • " . ,
4♦ ~ ' ~ ~'1
- ~ ~ .
L ♦ ~
, , . County e # PE-1168-78
' • , ZE '13-78
Sec. 33. Ranae 44 Tovinshi p 25
PdOTICE OF ACTION QY THE
~ SPOKANE COHTY Qoard of County Commissioners and
Nearing Examiner Committee
f
PURSUA;'dT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CNAPTEP, 43.21C RCW, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEPr' THAT
THE SPOKA~~~E CGUidTY GJCC and Hearin~ Exan;iner Committee_ did on (Board 1/29/79
Nearing Ex. Conini. 3/26/II1; GOCC 7/30/79 & 9/10/79; BQCC & HEaring Ex. Comm.
3/15/83; and subsequent time extensions by Hearing Examinier Committee) TAKE
THE ACTIO(dS DESCRIQED QELOW.
SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF (v0N-COMPLIANCE t-JITH THE PROVISIOtdS OF CHAPTER
43.21C RCtv.( STATE ENV I RO[VIEfdTAL POL I CY ACT ) SHP,LL B E COMP•1ENCED ON -512-zz-3
(30 days from date of 2nd newspaper publication) OR BE EARRED.
THE ACTIONS TAKEN QY TNE SPOKANE COUNTY GOCC and Hearinq Examiner Committee
NOTICE OF WHICH IS HEREl3Y GIVEPJ, WAS AS FOLLOWS:
(1) APPROVED ACTION: Prel iminary pl at, change of condi tion , lst Addi tion
Final__plat,_ lst_Pddition, zone_ rer.lassification=
Final&_ zone _reclassification_2nd Addition and
nuwerous tii,,ie extensions
COUiVTY FILE 1168-78 A(lst Addition) - 1168-78 B(2nd Addition)
(2) DESCRIPTION: Agricul turaltoR to_permi t luJ acres to be divided
i n to 437 1 o ts
(3) SUCh ACTION PERTAINED TO PROFERTY CGH^iQNLY KNCUrfd AS Ar;D/OR DESCRIBED AS
(street address per general location):
8ounded on the north by 32nd Avenue, on the east by Pines Road,
_ on the west by Bovldish and on the south by 40th Avenue, a_pproximately
160 acres. Section_33, Range 44, T rn•rnship 25
(4) PEP,TINEPlT DOCUti1EfdTS MAY GE EXAN1IfJED DURING NOWMP,L COUNTY 6USINESS HOURS
AT THE SPOKAIdE COUiVTY PLANINING DEPARTMENT, N. 721 JEFFERSOfd STREET,
SPQKANE, l•;ASH INGTOh! , 99260 PHONE : ( 509 ) 456-2205
NOT ICE GIVEN QY : 1,1 id1lonie, Inc.
FILED BY: NAME: Robert H. Toml inson TITLE: Secretary
SIGNATURE: .
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING •
STATE OF WASHINGTON
) S.S.
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
ROBE$,T H. TOMLINSON , being first duly sworn on
~
oath, deposes aad says: . i~'="- • That I am a citizen of the United States of America and a
resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years.
I persoaally mailed to the Department of Ecology a true and
correct copy of the NOTICE OF ACTION (a copy of which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference). This NOTICE OF ACTION, with
sufficient prepaid postage was mailed oa April 11, 1983 ,
f rom Post Of f ice Branch Man i to Stati orin SpOkane , Washington.
SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this llth day of
April , 19 83 .
sy
s'`, .w. " ✓ ~~'r' `~8
a~°'. ~ !
G~;~ • ~y~~%J' <
ti
tary Public in and.,_fca~` the `State
of Washington, residi_gg ~,at./Spoka~ne
o -i i e r
• '~AUf _ ~
Rev: 1/16i81 '
•
♦ ~ ~i
~
~
, County File # PE-1168-78 & ZE-13-78
. Sec. 33 R'ge 44 T'ship
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ' ) S.S. COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
EWAR BUESCHKE' , being first duly sworn
on oath, deposes and saps; -
. That I am a citizen of the Uaited States of America, and a resident
` of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years.
v
That on the day of , 19 I personal-
Z~~ ~
ly posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and
incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspicuous manner on
the. property, or as otherwise directed by the Planning Department, at the
, fallowing locations:
1. ~p~ '~e
~
2. /1r'l0
3. 4- (,j
4. jL
DATED this r~ day of , 19 •
~ /QF
[~yC
Li ' b
SIJBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day~.
rd
19 .3 °
K2 -
• 1 ~ ' c _
W V c d ♦P
f ~ / y' ♦
.
~ ✓ •
• o ary Public in d for the~.,State~ of
Washington, residing at Spokane
Rev, 8/80-SE-PA
ES-K
~
• s
~
AFFIDAVIT OF MAIZING .
STATE OF WASHINGTON •
) S.S•.
COUNTY OF SPOKANE
ROB R? H. TOMLINSOiV , being first duly sworn oa
C oath, deposes and says:
• That I am a citizen of the United States of America and a
resideat of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years.
I personally mailed to the Department of Ecology a true and
correct copp of the N4TICE OF ACTIQId (a copy of which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference). This NOTICE OF ACTION, with
sufficient prepaid postage was mailed on April 11, 1983 ,
from Post Office Branch Mdnito StatiOrin Spokane , Washington.
SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this 11th day of
April , 19 83
.+6
s•f , i ~~~6
r~
•
` ~ .
^ ~ f
~ • 1- v•~~~/~~!`~~ .i~.~'~r~
~;otary Public in and~fc~~; th~e SLate ~
of Washington, residi.ng at-.,Sqokane.,
v. . .s. d ♦
~ ~ ~ « y * y r
g • ' u y~ _ if ~
y~4n i
Rev: 1i16i81 '
~ ,
5
a
~
AFF1DAV[T OF PLlB1L1CAT10N
B'I'A'FE OF WABII7NGTCIN,
CQUiVTY OF SPOSANE,
° ~ ..,MI~eH~~ J. v WAHOVIvH
Mrouw aaAcDon, ar sno spakan, caunfy ,..~r.., berng irst duly ssvarn
8mvd a! povrnry Cammiitslanora prtd ~
i NmtSrYg eesrr►1rta Conmltloo
ft=m° t4 Ir'° PW',,s °i Ctwgm 43 21c EDT~R
oa oath d~pn~ses and ~ays t~h~t h~ is the. y
, pCrrl. ~:me ~ nora6y a~aan u~ trta 5sr~n,u~ of i.~te SPOKA~+1 E VA L LEY H ERALD, a ~reeklsT--rieti4~epapersTl7at ssid^nA3v~z-
c~1y a~a? ~n ++a~rn~g Ernrntnur ~amrn~Wv
ftanWnma,&n%mrya8.4a7g,Hoeng FAami,• paper is a 1ega1 nawspapor and i# is uow and hae teeu for rnare than aix
e+ rW,m111M MA►ah 26, 11?s1 aoac, a,ly M. onths
iws q~ ~a~~r 10. itrg ~ac,c a►W„v,~ m nriar to the dat.e of the publicafion hereinuft$r referrad 40. publislh€sl
, Evvnsra,Cartrnittu3u_M=►,ss,o0p.&nawas& in the English lange.taste cantiYtufllly a.g 3 weekly mcwepaper in SF0#cane Gquilt
Quflvri laim axtdtt:1cmby Nemnp Cxnmirrrr Carr W~+
~n:~i~a~9 ~~„p,a~, aslsau~;tua, z~nd it i~ nvw and c~urrng all of aaid tiima was printed i~ an affice
a,YC►cum wW o~.~no,En;¢In.rovtawaanw- T11:11i5f,atrie(} at the nfAresaid pI3fiB of publicatian of eatd rxewepaper, whiah
W~SS "aAgo aCh +uI= an tha Wm,nds W
fiaid ~1etiY8
. ~a+~~~a `'wm tt►~, ~ovr~ ~ cn~r Aapsr has ~rsea apprgved ae m leiRa1 newsPaPer hy order aF the 8u-
'a~'.24~ lti~ ~~~~nt' ~non ~+M psrior Cs~urt of tb~e 6t~ate of ~ilasbiangts~n in sad tvr 8 ak~e Gflua
y~ tia ccnmc~a 6, r~p„ ~7, tsea Pa eay~., Tha#, t~e
,
1T+o oeuaas-raLren by tne S"muo G~niy - aaaBged IB 8 t,ivo CQp,y of a---~~..
SMG atn! 1lntirhip Ernqrumer (trcvi~tm, rqllto
W wt++ch ia htroLyr glvpn, wnn m teeBwa
auara;rnl ascion. Prctu"nnrY RtnL oa^g$ of
t"Mhon. IL1AckfitlCnF&talplttll 1WAde:SWfl, . - -~.._..v_._......_ -
RartB Flnal atal d:oro as it wsas publiebed in reguiar isaues (and not in supplement fprm), of eatd
►Ix1x7M'rmttaa 2n1i Ad11lian am0 numrtrcu, + I
erne 613W"t3, C*u1Hy FrJo " - 116d ?HA i
(t a AAd:wn) - 1198•78F #2rx6 A&IBSOr+p o .["DII86~Gll~ritr8
n~~t~u,~n, a~~o„a~,~ u~ ~-E. ~n p~m~ ~~4 ewapaper onc$ each week for a period of-- .__~~.t~'~Ift
oar~ m be dw4W uao 49F w~,
8=11 ncfi+, offn0as t, ci amr, cwvro.y i weeks, cQmmec~oia~ an the,_ 20th ___day oi._..~pril $
~ ~ ~~a~a n~ ~ ~9_ 1.
' t* nCM by 37to AwCnU6, d71 1h0 QaSt bY
- PUt~.'G R=1 0n qt0 W'H7741 trY Bhviff:Eh wd W ~
. iFsq pWh tiy kMh AventiD a,~¢edaIrnpEqi}E 4fia
eOos, SoCtim sa, RarMn 44.T&*n3hV 25 and ending an the, .2.tbl_.._. day of.. -------1LPr_.
.2.._..... 19__14
~lPc,rar~l ftx„wnts " tm ekana~W au~q both dates inclustve, and that auch new,:paper u-as regularly buted to
re-ftitii Rubscriberg durin 0 o soid 'o[1.
~~1r ~;~.rv t?qnrtr3se,c►L ro, 721 .4~eNnr- ' bC
s~ut 8lraat, SPcknno Vda~i~:4n 09260, ~
l.
Ptoner `o Qh~n~Gy' M1dlParro~t I~
Ha
' 4-Z-~ 27 ~ ~ .
FYlc4 ~t; iioaei M 1'amllx~an. Satrulary
ubsrribad ~►nd ~~vora #,~a b~►fare ata thia........_ . _ ,
k3 `.....day
m....•..... ~i~ril
~ f ~
Nnt:tr Pu lie ~n andijor !t►c State of Wstsbfngton,
Reaiaing 8c; spokane, wA
~r ' ' ~ ~ a ~ • t
~ '~'r~• ~ r . , . •
~~~d~"~`~~ •~4``-~'~ .~-~y,''"~ ~ ZW a . '~~`~~~l1~~,° •a~^.`= ' -0 _ s ` -,~~.~4' • * ~ • V ~ ~ !~'7
• i ,1~, ' 1 ~ f ~ A Y,a'+~4+4~~ Lyy~~ ala ► '~~"~s'~~~ ' ~;t.~'.'~-- ~a,v'~~p! ~ d►~ y+
* i ~L
3r~~.~...~~4 C _an~S~~,-{t7k~diY~ilp~.~`#~+ ~~.',at~..3'w__~: cs: aio~--_~'r..E~ ...d~t#¢_~si...k~M ,i.t~~~-~1:_~t ~ _ ts , ' ~,~7;_i L t
t. ~ f
~ - y
~ y ' - ~ - -
~ < < a
. 1_.. a . ,~+u► ` _arsrw•rL.._ • 1.,'- J'' --""q - Y , , . s~ ~ _'Z t ~ ~ .t
ti " ~ _ ' - ~r ~ . ~1i(~. . l~• '~L'7►`tr-s-T/~► 1 i.'.
iu . _ _ _ _ _ - _ - ~ ' _
. - ~ _ ~ Y ' , ~ ` - F .[~~,a ('1. _;r~ ' _~r, .,3 ~ - ;T~ ` ~r• y'
t - ~ ~ , -~:e . / s • ~ . ~ ~J= ' _ £~'~~~uis+ _ ~si. ~ ' f ~ qA
~l ~ -
' r-
~ ~ 5 - - - . . ~ ac--^ : _ ~ - - ~ a- •S.r. ► h i ~ r
T - x
~ _ _ ~ . '1~' ' ~ ~~y,}~ - ~ F • • v-
o
O
n
March 4, 1983 41 Fi 1 o. PE-11688-78
Fi ndi ngs & Order Mi c1i 1 ome 2nd Addi -ti on
SPOKAPIE COUfJTY
. HEARIfdG EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDIPIGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Spo►cane County Hearing Examiner Comrnittee
on March 4, 1983 and the members-of the Committee present being Ron McUicker,
, Chairperson, Lynn Tennican and Rich Skalstad.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Mi di lome, Inc., is requesting approval of an Extension of Tilne
for PE-11688-78, MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION, and Zone Change ZE-13-78, Agricultural
to R-1, for subdivision of 112 acres into 307 lots for single-family dwel1ings,
and there being present, thc folloaling applicant or representative:
ROBERT TOMLINSOM
. .
C. FINDINGS OF FAGT
1. That the proUisions of RC14 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with.
2. That the proper legal requirements for artvertisem2nt of the Agenda Item
- have been fulfi l led.
3.• Tha~ the owners of adjacent lands expressed neiih2r approval nor
disapproval of 'Lhe proposed Extension of Time.
4. "fhat the information in the STAFF REPORT uras considereci.
5. That subs -*tanti al progress has been made toward f i nal i zation of thi s
preliminary plat. `
6. That this proposal does constitute "fill-in" development for the
URBAN category, for the Priority Sewer Service Area, and for existing
public facilities and seraices in ihe vicinity.
7. That provisions of State Subdivision la4v establishes three (3) year
approval for preliminary plats.
i
983 Fil PE-1168B-78
h 4, 1
i F
ings & Order Midilome 2nd Addition
D. SPECIAL EXPLANATION OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION
1. Those conditions as listed in the March 4, 1983 STAFF REPORT, except
as'amended below.
PLANNING CONDITIONS
2. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3)
years to April l, 1986. The applicant may request a three (3) year
extension of time, if RCW 58.17 allows such at that time, by submitting
a written request forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration
date. Such applications should demonstrate the progress made toward
finalizing this preliminary plat. If a time extension is not requested
in a timely manner or a time extension is not granted, then the prelim-
inary plat approval is NULL & VOID.
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
IF tign Rc P 1§PP-?A, Mioi lpmo ?nd Adclition, and Zane Change zE-13-78,
1,01~ ali t.xLelts Iuii uf I iine is hercby APPROVED to April l,
1986.
Motion by: Rich Skalstad Seconded by: Lynn Tennican
Vote: UNANIMOUS
Ron McVicker - Aye
Lynn Tennicari - Aye '
Rich Skalstad - Aye
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
, HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE .
,-FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE.
Chairperson
' .
° ' ~ yi ► ~ . 7~_ ~,/~L ~ ~
. ATTEST:
JOHN NUNNERY ~
Subdivision Administrator .
By: /y,"60- ,
,
Date •
-2-
,
STAFF' REPORT ' • Ma 4
rch , 1983
T0: SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION HEARI:NG EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
1
RE: ~EXTENSION OF TIME for ~
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION .
,
PE-1168B-78, MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION ZE-13-78 Agricultural to R-1
,
I. GENERA.L INFORMATION ` Sponsor: 928-4220 . Surveyor/EnRineer: 926-1322
Midilome, Inc. Simpson Engineers S. 717 Pines Road N. 909 Argon.ne Road ~ Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99206 '
~
= Locatioa: The proposal is located in the south central Spokane
; Valley, east of of Dishman-Mica Road and south vf Opportu.nity, more
A,91fitN Z~o',~djt3 Zaid, zzd 32ad and 40th
p.venu.ez; y/ithin -
Section 33, '!'ownship 2511, Range 44 EWM, Spokaae County, Wasbington
Couiprctic:ris lrivc E'lari: U1ZI3AN
History:.,. Midilome Addition, originally known as Chester Addition,
' was approved in April 1976 as a 7-phase proposal. The first phase,
Midilome Addition, was finalized in April 1977; the second phase,
Midilome lst Addition, was finalized in July 1979; and a portion of
phase three is currently being reviewed for finalization (the Juae
1983 HOr1E SHOW will be held on this portion of Midilome) as Midilome
'2ud Acldition. The preliminary plat has received 6 one-year Extension
of Time approvals, in which the March 1981 extension included a
add1zdai1 3 _IVtZ ...1 ~~?~~~~~~i►.'~~ S~J:taJ.~ iu.i2 ~ ~ s tijjC,~r%~gr~ss rras ;deea maaL- as : tnao phases
have been filed and built; the sewer treatment plant and drains-
field, designed for the entire preliminary plat, is built and oper-
ating under an 0& M Agreement with Spokane County; and a portion of '
of phase-three is currently being finalized through the various -
County departments. The sponsor stresses that the preliminary plat approval was required for his entire 160 acres and was subsequeatly
approved as a 10-year phased development with at least seven phases.
,
Due to the poor economic conditions of the housing market the
' scheduled 10-year development program has "slipped", therefore, the
sponsor is requesting this change be a consideration of his request. i
Proposal: The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the
preliminary plat approval to divide the remaining 112 acres into 307 '
lots for single-famxly dwellings and to change the zoning on the 112
• S
acres from Agricultural to R-1.
•}M
4 +ivo
_ LP2-P ' , ~i • a~ f:
. . ~ , . , ; ' a.
- , • . ,
t 1 STAFF REPORT March 4,
PE-1168B-78
II. SPECIAL IiNFORMATION
The Planning Department is recommending that all preliminary plat approvals be
brought into coaformance with RCW. 58.17 regarding the amount of time allowed
before a preliminary plat must be finalized. State law currently allows a
preliminary plat three (3) years (without any new conditions) and allows one
extension of time for one year, if the sponsor requests the additional year;
however, this 4th year may have new conditions added. Staff is recommending
three (3) years for the extension of time rather thaa only one (1) year due to
the preliminary plat being0 approved for long-term "phased" development.
Staff finds that this preliminary plat constitutes "fill-in" development for
the Urbaa Category, for the Valley Sewer since the proposal is within the
Priority Sewer Service Area (PSSA), and for the existing public services and
facilities of the near vicinity.
Since the sponsor has, in good faith, complied with the agreement of the '
conditioned approval by making progress toward finalizing this preliminary
plat and since the proposal was approved as a long-term "phased" project, ,
staff recommends the three (3) year extension be granted with the opportunity
to request another three (3) year time extension if substantial progress
continues to be made.
No other additional conditions of approval are being recommended by the re-
maining departments.
III. CONDITIONS
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommmended.
PLANNING CONDITIONS
those con3itiotts alrcaay aLtsched to the preliminary plat of record.
A :z apprar~! ~ . L~
yeac•s Co April I, 2956. 1'he applicant may request a taree (3) year
extension of time by submitting a written request fort}►-five (45) days
prior to the above e.cpiration date. Such applications should demonstrate
the progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If a time •
extension is not requested 3n a timel}* manner or a time exLension is not
$VAnt,P,~, tAOln tt;e )Nielim:.MAZ-r r1~t- A 1`1) t~Wal is -NZMIL .i t'OID,
,
1
~ •
~
y
~
~ LP2-P
t
. .
~Q
.
iri~~t-t~~ 3U, 19$2 Ie No. (`i_-1i6~B -7$
PFindings & Order ZE-13-78
'
SPOKANE COUNTY • '
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE .
FINDINGS AND ORDER .
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing
Examiner Committee on March 30, 1982 and the members of the Committee
present being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Jane Myers, and Elc,ion Thomas.
B. PROPOSAL .
The sponsor, Midilome, Inc., is requesting approval of an Extension of
Time for PE-116813-78, Midilome 2nd Addition, and ZE-13-78, Agricultural .
~ to R-1 for subdivision oF 112 acres into 307 lots for single-family d4vel-
~ lings and there being present, the following applicant or representative:
~
~ No One
~
,
{ C. FINDINGS OF FACT
~ 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
~ have been compl ied with.
2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
,
3. That tihe owners of adjacent Iands expressed neither approval nor disap-
proval of the proposed Extension of Time.
~
4. That the sponsor demonstrated that progress has been made toward
finalizing this Rlat and that this preliminary plat was approved for phased
development.
,
, .
a .
( D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTlNGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS EXTENSION
OF TIME APPROVAL;
Those conditions, tivithin the March 30, 1982 Stafi' Analysis.
~ E. ORDER
~ The Hearing Examiner Commillee pursu@nt lo the aforementioned, fiinds that
the application of PE-11688-78, Midilome 2nd Addition, and ZE-13-78 Agri-
cultural to R-1, for an Extension of Time request is hereby approved to
' April I, 1983.
,
.
I
~w
I;,oc. e No. • EJL'= 11,68t3-i8
dings & Order ZE-13-78
, ~ .
,
L':
a •
i r
t ♦ ~ m
S+lt~t`~~
Viote: UnanD,.;s .
Jerry Williams - aye ~
Jane Myers - aye
. Eidon Thomas - aye
H ARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE `
- ~h ' per on
~
, ' - • .
~
' ATT EST :
~ JOHN NUNNERY
,
Subdivision Administrator
.
ay
DATE:
~
z
4 ~
~ •
~
i
. ~
. FO-E/b
,
o _
,
~ •,~t~~; . 2 .
i '
~ ~`tf
~ .
. ` , ~ ' ,
AGENDA, March 30, 1982 TEI,EPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PI.ANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
TIME: Tuesday, March 30, 1982 - 9 A.M. (Item #3 on Morning Agenda)
PLACE: Broadway Ceatre Building, 2nd F1oor
N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, WA
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECI.ASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME
PE-1168B-78, MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION
ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1
a. Location: Located in the south central Spokane
- Valley, east of Dishman Mica Road and
south of Opportunity, more specifically bounded by Pines, Bowdish '
, Road, 32nd and 40th Avenues. I
.b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 EWM
NE 1i4 of Section 33, except Midilome
Addition, also except Midilome lst Addition. Also except r/w for
Pines Road; also except r/w for Bowdish Road; also that portioa of
the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 34, Township 25N,
Range 44 EWM west of Pines Road extended to Madison Road.
c. Sponsor: Midilome, Inc.
S. 717 Pines Road
Spokane, WA 99206
, d.?EngineerJSurveyor: Simpson Engineers
N. 909 Argon.n.e Road
Spokane, WA 99206
e. Site Size: 112 acres
f. Number of Lots: 307
g. 'Proposed Land Use: Single-family dwellings
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural
i. Proposed Zoning: R-1
j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District #18
k. School District: Central Valley School District #356
1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Community Treatment Plant
M. Change of Condition: The sponsor is requesting a Change of
Conditions resulting in the realignment
of Pines extended, thus creating 3 additional lots.
, n. Environmental Impact: • A proposed declaration of ' -
non-significance (a prela.minary decisioa,
which may be reversed, that an environmental imrpact statement, an
EIS, is not needed) has been administzatively issued. This insures
the applicant of a timely processing of his/her proposal at the time
of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the public hearing
is to afford the opportunity to present the decision makers with
informatioa as to whether or not a potential SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE
impact upon the physicalr:.enviroament will result from implementation
of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However,
all "extensions of time" aad most "change of conditions" are exempt
f rom the provisions of SEPA; check with the Planning Departmeat
staff if uncertaiaty exists. o. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension uatil April 1, 1983.
,
P8-0
~ s~: 3 '
,ti;,. NL-1'168k3-i8
ZE-13-78
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAI`JIINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. 1NTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on March 26, 1981 and
the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairperson,
Kathy Carstens and Jane Myers.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Midilome, I nc. , is -requesting approval of a preliminary plat and
Change, of Condition, PE-1168-78, Midilome 2nd Addition and ZE-13-78, Agri-
cultural to R-1 for subdivision of 112 acres into 307 lots for single family dwellings
and there being present, the following applicant or representative:
BOB TOMLINSON
C. FINDINGS OF FACT ,
1. That the provisions of RCtiN 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with.
2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
3. That the o4vners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis-
~,qpr,fla/,aJ (..Tlf LthL us,?,.
4. The following are addifiional findings •of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That reasonable progress tcward Pinaliling ttie plat has occurreci.
D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS
SUBDIVISION APPROVAL:
PLANNING CONOITIONS
1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to
review any preliminary plat of approval. All extensions applied for may
subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing
Agencies.
3. That a time extension be granted to April 1, 1982.
4. That the proposal is exempt trom the provisions of the State Environmental
Pol icy Act, Chapfier 43.21C R CIN, pu rsuant to WAC 197-10-170 (Si
1
~ ZE-13-78
5. There will be no phasing of the pi,oject, and the plat will be finalized in
its entirety unless approved by the Subdivision Administrator.
6. That the area containing the three (3) additionai lots be zoned Single ,
Family Residential (R-1) upon filing the final plat.
ENGINEER CONDITIONS
1. That the "conditions of approval" which have been attached to the prelimin-
ary plat of record are adequate and should be required for this change of
condition. The plat of Midilome shall be subject to the provisions of
Spokane Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80-1592 as amended,
attachment "C".
HEALTH CONDITIONS "
1. We offer no new recommended condifiions; only those conditions already
attached to the preliminary plat of record and those conditions imposed by
the Spokane Board of County Commissioners on December 1, 1977 (Resolu-
tion #77-1394).
UTI LITY CONDITIONS
1. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any
petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local
improvement district (UL(D) pursuant to RC1N Chapter 36.94, as amended.
The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or
protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district
(ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County.
3. That provisions for public sewers be made. NOTE: Planned treatment
plant expansion is adequately sized to accommodated the three (3) addi-
tional lots but the area set aside for the drainfield area may not be shown
large enough to accommodate full development of the Midilime Subdivision
and these three (3) lots. Phase 5, or an equivalent thereof, should not
be approved unitl appropriate departments have decided if additional
drainfields are needed.
BU I LDI NG AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
1. Recommend approval with condition that prior to development o1' this prop-
erty that an engineered water distiribution system plan shall be submitted
to the Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. This distribu-
tion plan shall include water main size, flows, locations, fire hydrant type
and locations, water storage tanks size, and location and design criteria.
2 ,
^ ~lle No. r'E--I*dG8B-73
06 ZE-1'3-78
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the application of Midi{ome, Inc. for an Extension of Time and Change of Con-
dition as described in the application should be approved.
Motion by: Carstens Seconded by: Myers Vote: Unanimously to Approve (3-0)
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
. /
• / Chairpers, n
~
/ l G~~~~t~ t-'~~~C;.~ • i > ~L.l~ . . / /
!
~t''lt..lr / ( . o / .~~Z•'il~
ATT EST :
WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
.
.
g y ;
Date:
1
3
/
w
PE-1168B-78, MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION
•1 i ~ ° , .~vl~1~w a t ~ 9 J J f 1l~
I~.~ ~ I ,ti ~ Q S
5 • COu.+7v AO^O Na 2312♦ j • ~1~ "I'
II r.~~~u.I!_~~i~~V~o ~ tJ~ V 1\~ J ~\I a _.o , ~ ' V`Ep~ALE
.19i ~ ~ ~T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .♦~(~2 M1~ ~o.• ~f
l l..f
; GC! I
1 ~e. ' ~ .r y-a- i •r.. ♦vC , r ~ ~
~ t ~ ~ ' • i !
A ~ ~ ~ ,r DIoX1i~1ET
o"' I CC
{ ~ ~ ' ` * ` i i, _ .q a 'Q I
uw~a.•.~~ , Q r ~ . • 1!~ _ . _ ~7 t.. ( ~W6.
; \+I .i ~I SN ~ ~ '1 ~ .lr~- ' `1 ~I
S L 0. ~ ~ ry
6 y•- ,y. : ~ ti , . ~ ~ ;V ~i..i.,_ ~ ~ -
F'l /IN 0 i~~~
- t•~•I..• ~ a . , ~ l
l../ ..N ~ ~ . ~ S ~ aI . . ~ ' ~
! , ~ 't ~ ' f y ` ~ ~ i • .
:s, . ` tn ' • ``4 ' . ~ ~ ; w _ 4 ' '
I \ ' ' ; o + • I- ' '
I ~ tL ,N,, ~ ~ ~ ,i+ ~
\ 7 ' ~ /~x y , / ° I • t • ~ • '+i~
~ ~ '~1 a / , . • . • ~ ~ 2.C 1 r
` ; ~ ~ hr r~~~~y _ ' •
I ~ ~ ` , • ~ _
( ` ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ' ~
I \ ~ ' c o e • o~ ,
I • ~ b ~ o a~-
~ • • • .
M
~ t r
~ - -
• I~ 4 d p J1 W j. .1 ~r~~ ~ ~11 ~h M.Ir ~A ~A •bI.H .H .y ~1 rM •fi i1o ~ w ~ Y r•f w, ra~ .N.' s nl U rY M-N 1 ~ M
~ f 1. ♦
5~c ~A,
i \ ~~f.~' I I 0 i 1. ~t; ~~r ~ ~rt ~
~ : I
' ' ~O A vE 1 l' ~
, j
. \ ~ ~ . ♦ ~ y ~ 1
'
•Vc% 611.Stona0rd ~Poto11o TW P :M N • R'44 EN
E~ ~ ~ _ ' ~ ~ • ' ~T-wP.24 N. ~R44E
; 3 ~ ~ ~ ~
rn •f t ~ ~ . [ ~ I ♦ ` • ~
o Q ~ • ~ ~
~ : j, ' ,
. .
- ~ . _ - _ . _ ~ -r,. . .
. - . ~ -
~ / a` ~ , \ I = I i " • I
3A
' • .
~
! _~J
, r
STAFF ANALYSIS - MARCH 30, 1982
EXTENSION OF TIME AND CHANGE OF CONDTTIONS
PE-1168B-78, MIDILOME 2ND ADDITION
ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1
1. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. History .
Midilome Addition, originally known as Chester Addition, was approved
April 1976 as a 7-phase proposal. The first phase, Midilome Addition,
was finalized April 1977, and the second phase, Midilome;lst Addition,
was filed July 1979.-
This proposal, Midilome 2nd Addition, has received 5 one-year Exten-
sion of Ti.me approvals, with the March, 1981 approval including a
change of conditions to expand the proposal by 3 lots.
The sponsor indicates that progress is being made as the sewer plant
' and drainfield are being operated by Spokane Countq under an Opera-
tion and Maintenance Agreement. The sponsor requests that his
160-acre, 10-year development with 7 phases, be granted a one-year '
Extension of Time to April 1, 1983, so they can proceed as originally
s approved . ,
B. Location
In the South Central Spokane Valley, east of Dishman-Mica Road and
south of Opportunity, more specifically bounded by Pines Road oa the
East, Bowdish to the west, 32nd Avenue on the north, and 40th Avenue
on the south.
C. Proposal
- Project size is 112 acres subdivided into 307 lots for single-
, family use.
- Lot f rontage = 85 feet. '
- I,ot size = 11,500 sq. ft.
NOTE: The original project encompassed 160 acres to be divided
, into 437 lots; to date,.two phases have been finalized with 133 lots
on 48 acres.
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
A. Circulation
The County Engineer has recommended aa amendment to the standard
conditioa regarding the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution
No. 80-1592 per current saording.
B. No other conditions of approval were recommended.
~
~
3B
~ STAFF ANAI,YSIS - , 30, 1982 '~.OME ZND ADDITION (cont. )
.
II I . CONDITIONS :
,
:
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recomnended.
~rb~
. PLANNING CONDITIONS
1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record:"f ~
~ 2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time exten-
sion to review any preliminary plat of approval. All extensions
applied for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions re-
quired by Reviewing Agencies. •
3. That a ti.me extension be granted to April 1, 1983.
ENGINEER CONDITIONS '
' 1. The plat of Midilome shall be subject to the provisions of Spokane.
Board of County Commissioners Resolution #80-1592 as amended.
Delete Engineer's Condition No. 1 of Hearing Examiners Committee's
Findings and Order, March 26, 1981.
,
.
• ,
~
,
.
:
~
~
, s.
. ,
• i i .
v. 'l,~ ! +1 '
t ' iy r
♦
r
P8-V
;
y
3C
. ~
AGEiJDA, <<larch 26, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIPJG SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER C0MMITTEE
TIME: Thursday, 14arch 26, 1981 - 1:30 P.M. ( Item #l on Afternoon Agenda)
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane '
PRELI14INARY SUBDIV ISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOid - EXTEtdSION OF TIME AND
CHANGE OF COND IT I ON .
PE-11686-78, MIDILOPr1E 2ND ADDITION
ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL 70 R-1
,
a. Location: - In the soutn central Spokane Valley,
east of Dishman Mica Road and south of
' Opportunity, more specifically bounded by Pines, Bowdish Road,
32nd and 40th Avenues.
~
b. Legal Description: Section 33, Township 25tl, Range 44 EWM
NE 1J4 of Section 33, except Plidilome
Addition, also except Midilome lst Addition. Also except r/w
for Pines Road; also except r/w for Bowdish Road; also that portior
of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 34, Township
25N, Range 44 E.W.M. west of Pines Road extended to P1adison Road.
c. Sponsor: ' Midilome, Inc.
• S 717 Pines Road
Spokane, WA. 99206
d. EngineerJSurveyor: Simpson Engineers
N 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, WA. 99206
e. Site Size: 112 Acres
f. Number of Lots : 307 g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dyiellings
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural
i. Proposed Zoning: R-1
j. Water Source: Model Irrigation District #18
k. School District: ' Central Valley District n356
, 1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Community treatment plant.
• m.Change of Conditlon: The sponsor is requesting a Change of
Condit}ons resulting in the realign-
' ment of Pines extended, thus creating 3 additional lots.
n. Sponsor is requesting a Time Extension until April l, 1982. .
,
o. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration or non-significance
(a preliminary decision, which may be re-
versed, that an environmental impact statement, an EIS, is not needed),has
been administratively issued. This insures the applicant of a timely pro-
cessing of nis/her proposal at the time of the public hearing. BUT, a
major purpose of the public hearing is to aff ord the opportunity to present
the decision makers NJ1tI1 information as to whether or not a potential SIGNI-
FICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will result from im-
plementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the need for an EIS. However4,
all "extensions of time" and most "change of conditions" are exesnpt from the
provi si ons of SEPA; check wi th the Pl anni ng Department staff. if uncertajnty .~4~;t,
exists.
-
- 8
~ ~ ~ t . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~P ' i ~
~ • •~j ~ J 'r ' ~K~'-,~'C~ ~ I t'~ ~}~'Y 5e'~ ~ ~'p~, ~ T'~ ~ '~sy}~- y -
~t 1 ~ }
I'~ o ~ ( ♦ ~
2a T~.~:~ ~ y r . ~ ~ • ~ ; ~ ~ j~4 T'r ~ A~~
2Q V ~ --i-•~'27T , . ~.+.--r.,; - : ~y~''r~t'I~:^ !."Xa~ ~ ~ 7-=t-• ~ . , . . , ti ,r ~ • -ti--i~.
~ • ~ ~ " ~ W i ~ty ` . '+.r..~++ . ~ ~ r ~ ~
' . ~ , T~ AV' . J ~'t ~ . : ~ ~ ~ , ~ c5'~"N ` -•K VE
~ ~ r •s ZS
1 . ~ _ ^ 0:,~,~1~1:.~- ~s SL,,C....~.,, . , ~ f'h ~ . , , e q, . `t - 'y' -
~ rq ~ ' { • ` r r ` 2 1 • ' S ~ . ~ . ~ -q y~ ~ . • ♦
26~ TN AVE Avr'•
1 1i. W ..t~v . . ' 1,. . .~il ~ . i 1 ~ ~ r. ~ ~ ~ ~v . ~
Q 11 ~ 11, i1~J~.✓ ~ j /r►.. 1~' 1
PL}JG , `s ~ / 4t ` ~ ~ ~'O J • ~ \ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 1', ~~U .q ~ ,Qr• •n~ ' P7~N AVE
27 T~ ~k ~ ~ r, • ,
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . 'Si.►i~!` f v } . ~ . t [ s ~ ` , ~
. 1 • ' ~ . l • ~ O TN V E
xL.. ~ _ • ~ _Z
~ ,N • , • 1 -a , w 1 ; . , , ~ , i.._., ; \ ,c o- , -
It L 9 T'+ F~ V E ~
- ' ~ ~ • ' % ' ~ ~ ' ~ 4 g
3 ~ ,,,,1 ~ ~ . - e. ~ . L er%D Y '
Li
~10
3a 14 • 'L l~ 3 ~7 ~ , ~ ~ , rc' . . L`~' ~ ' t ~ ~ ►o TM " , ~ >
3 3 AvP. .y ~ ! y~~ a~ o~ 4~, 1•. Q' , ~~•s~ W~
2N~ E N U E '1•~ a • •~i. ~~1. ~~`~~1 ~ . , j. 7.1 , •r♦ . , • . . : • ~ . .~,J , ~
T 14 Q ~ ~ . . • f y' ' ~
o1 • ~ ~ 1 } . ~
~ •'g 1 ~ o ~ . ' ~ • i
i '~TM: ^~4 ~ i _ ' ; • ~ ' •
4 • ' LU
• ~ ~aTM ~ ~ ~ . .
~ 41~
~ a(.rri
~ ~ ~.i... . ,
w • ' ~ i
, ~ J 7 Yj-~ • ~ , ~ ,
► ~ ' d ~ ,
40 T)4 • J 4nrx av E
,
PEOM 16 8=7PS .
~ ~ 1~
+ ~ ~ , ~ _J• r..l.] ~1 r.._1 ' . _ , ~
J
I \ J I rj ~ ~ .
~ sTER I ~ ~ - ,
•No~~; ° . ~ ~
r , . ~
,uE~CEm . , ~ • . • . , .
6th Sfiandard Parallel
~ t . ~ ~ ~ . • . ~
~ -j;--~ 7H R PE - - -1 • - - - - '
,
TN ja7'r`+ y l + N ~ ~ ~ /
00o
°
~ r ~ -
~ ' ~ •'/r ~
~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - -~j- .
~ .
, 5A-
~
STAFF ANALYSIS - MARCH 26, 1981
PE-1168B-78, MTDTLOME 2ND A.DDITION
ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R-1)
EXTENSION OF TIME AND CHANGE OF CONDITIONS
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. Location
In the South Central Spokane Valley, east of Dishman-Mica Road and south of
Opportunity, more spec'ifically bounded by Pines on the east. Bowdish to the
west, 32nd Avenue on the aorth and 40th Avenue on the south.
B.. Proposal
- Project size is 112 acres subdivided into 307 lots for single family use.
- Lot frontage = 85 feet
- Lot size = 11,500 sq. ft.
NOTE: The original project encompassed 160 acres to be divided into 437 lots;
to date, two phases have been finalized with 133 lots oa 48 acres.
C. Relationshlp to the Comprehensive Plan
The proposal is located in the "Urban" Category of the Generalized Compre-
hensive Plan for Spokane Couaty. The project is a"fill-in" development and
appears to be consistent with the general purpose, detailed definition and
general intent of the Comprehensive Plan Text. The project site lies within
th.e boundaries of the Aquifer Sensitive Area and the General Sewer Service
Area. The proposal is to be served by the existing sewage treatment plant.
In considering the above, the Planning staff would therefore recommend approval
• of this project.
D. Change of Conditions:
The sponsor is requesting the addition of three (3) lots to the project as a
result of negotiations with the Central Valley School District and the County
Engineers Department. The site, coataining the three additional lots, is
presently vacant, Pines Road is improved to the south boundary of the school
site.
1. Existing Land Uses
Project slte The Midilome praject is developing a.n a southeasterly
direction, the site containing the change of conditions is
vacaat.
North Midilome preliminary plat and elementary school site.
East Uadeveloped ,
r
South Undeveloped
,
West Midilome preliminary plat and undeveloped °
. - ,
,
1 - 8B -
t F rt °
, yF4 ~
~
STAFF ANALYSIS - -~6, 1981 __.LDILOME 2ND ADDITION - continue('
2. Compatibility with ExistinR Land Uses
. The proposed change of conditions resulting in three (3) additional lots would
appear to be consistent and compatible with the developing Midilame lots.
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
A. Circulation
The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed change of conditions and
finds that the "conditions of approval" which have been aLtached to the pre-
liminary plat of record are adequate and shouid be required for this change of
condition. The plat of 'Midilome shall be subject to the provisions of the
~ Board of Caunty Commissioners Resolution #80-1592 as amended, attachment "C".
{ B. Sewage Disposal
j
i The Health District indicates that the three (3) additlonal lots are intended
' to be included in the existing sewage treatment facility and that adequate
a area exists to accommodate the additional lots.
i
~ C. Water Supply '
, •
~ ,The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Model Irrigation
' District #18.
The District advises the staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire on
their part to serve, exists for the provlsion of water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
D. Draina&e '
Final construction plans should be reviewed and approved by both the County
Engineer and Health District prior to the final plat filing.
E. Fire Protection
The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection
District #1. ,
The Fire District staff requests that the Hearing Examiner Committee require
' mains.and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection as a condition of
final plat approval. The District also requests that they be allowed to
. review and approve final fire flows and water plans.
F. Schools
Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District #356.
,
G. Unique Environmental Features .
~ None have been identified.
~
, 2 - SC -
a
i
PP . ~
STAFF ANALYSIS - MAh.. :-)26 , 1981 LOI'IE 2ND ADDITION • continued
HEALTH CONDITIONS
1. We offer no new recornruended conditioas; oaly those conditions already attached
to the preliminary plat of record aad those conditions irnposed by the Spokane
Board of County Commissioners on April 7, 1977 .(Resolution #77-1394).
UTII.ITY CONDITIONS
1. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in aay petition
or resolution which purpose is the foranation of a utility local improvement
district (UZID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his
heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal
assessments for any utrlity local improvement district (ULID) established
pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provlded in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County.
3. That provisions for public sewers be made. NOTE: Planned treatment plant
expansion is adequately sized to accommodated the three (3) additional lots
but the area set aside for the drainfield area may not be shown large enough
to accommodate full development of the Midilime Subdivision and these three
(3) lots. Phase 5, or an equivalent thereof, should not be approved unitl
appropriate departments have decided if additional drainfields are needed.
BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTtENT
1. Recommend approval with condition that prior to development of this property
that an engineered water distribution system plan shall be submitted to the
Spokane County Department of Building and Safety. This distributioa plan
shall include water main size, flows, locations, fire hydrant type aad lo-
cations, water storage tanks size, and location and design criteria.
• ` . .
' - 8E
4 . , .
op'
STAFF ANALYSIS - MARCi.26, 1981 MlDILOME 2ND ADDITION - continued
H. Cultural Resources
' None have been identified. I•. AQricultural Suitability
The site has been committed to urban use by the Soil Conservation 5ervice.
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
Project site Presently zoned Agricultural
Compatibility The Plan.ning staff would recommend Single Family Residential
(R-1)
_ Zoning consistent wlth the classification of the Midilome
project.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
That the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State EnvironmenLal Policy
Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW, pursuant to WAC 107-10-110 (Si).
V. CONDITIOI3S :
' If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended.
.1
' PLANNING CONDITIONS
1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to
review any preliminary plat of approval. A11 extensions applied for may
subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies.
3. That a time extension be granted to April 1, 1982.
4. That the proposal is exempt from the provisions of the State Environmental
, Policy Act, Chapter 43.21C RCW, pursuant to WAC 197-10-170 (Si).
5. There will be ao phasing of the project, and the plat will be finalized in its
entirety unless approved by the Subdivision Ad.ministrator. •
b. Zhat the area containing the tihree (3) additional lots be zoned Single Family
Residential (R-1) upon filing the final plat.
i
ENGINEER CONDITIONS
1. That the "coaditions af approval" which have been attached to the preliminary
plat of record are adequate and should be required for this change of coadition.
The plat of Midilome shall be subject to the provlsions of Spokane Board of
County Cornmissioaers Resolution #80-1592 as amended, attachment "C". '~"t'_ ,
. 7~1 1
• a
80 , 3
~ ' .
.y . • r
} .
Aftf
• _J
rro. 470
BEFQRE THE BQARD QF COUNTY COMMISSIONER,S 0F SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
IN THE MATTER OF THE RECOMMENDAT IONS ~
FRC)M THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ~
CCNCERNING THE COMMISSION IS AGENDA, AATED ~ RESOLUTICN
Ma.RCx 30, 1978 )
)
WHEPXAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, pursuant to the
provisions of the Revisec3 Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620, &hall upon
recei,pt of any recommended official control or amendment thereto, at its next
regular public meeting set the date for a public meeting "re it may, by ordiuance,
adopt or reject the official control or amendment; and
WHERFAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by Resolution
No. 78 433 acknowledge receipt of the recommendations from the Spokane County
Planning Commission concerning its Agenda, dated March 30, 1978, and,
W'HERFA5, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by said
resolution set this 13th day of Aprll to consider the recomtnendations of the
Planning CommissXon concerning its March 30, 1978 agenda, a copy of said
recommendations are attached hereto a.nd incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington, that based upon the information available to the Board and
the testimony at this meeting the followzng action was taken:
1. PE-1087-r?? - SWAN ACRES REPLAT # 1: SWAN
ZE- 47-?? - AGRICULT[JRpL SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to
approve the extension of time.
2. PE-1090-77 - FQRF,ST GREEN SUBDIVISYON REPLAT #1: WARD
ZE- 50-77 - UNCLASSIFIED TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN
The Board concurred with the Plaruling Commission's recommendation to
approve the exteneion of time. '
3. PE-1153-77 - NORTIiW00D 2ND ADDITI OIr' : ANDERSON ,ZE- 1 83-7? - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMT-LY RESIDENTIAL
Having received a communication in disagreement with the Plannin Comml~rsion's
recommendat~. on for approval, the Board se t a date of
at /:Op le-'%J7 of saYd da to furth r co s'
y n ider the matter.
4. PE-11 55-'77 - NORTHWOOD 3RD ADDITION : GUNNING
ZE- 193-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RE5IDENTIAL
Having received a communication i,i disagreernent wlth the Plann~i}~ g CommiJ' ssion's
recommendation for approval, the ~3oard set a date of 7; X97,~" ~
at BG of said day to further consider the -matter.
~ 5• PE-1168-?8 - MIDILONiE F'.LRST ADDIT [ 4N : MIDILOME, INC.
ZE- 13-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESYnETTAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to continue
thxs preliminary plat to a later date. 6. PE-1172-78 - MrCA PAkK : C. FRT`t'Z NF.LSON
ZE- 17-78 - AGRTCULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDIIVTIAL AND/OR MULTIPLE FAMILY
+ SUBURSAN
Having received a conununication in disagreement with t~e Planning Commiseion's
recommendation for approval, the Board set a date of
at of said day to furt~ consider the matter.
' . ,
' S
r?~. 4"
i
PE-1161-77 - SUNSET MEADOWS SUBDIVISION : SWANSON C/0 GREENWOOD RFALTY
ZE- 203-']7 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY F{ESIDENTIAL
The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommeadation to deny .
- the preliminary plat wi thout pre judi ce . ' , .
8• PE-1170-?8 - COLUhiBIA PARK 1 ST ADDITION : BONUCCELLI ZE- 15-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDIINTIAL
Having received a communication in disagreement with the Plan.ning CommieBi.on' a"
recommendation for continuance, the Board set a date of
at d ; D C~ of said day to furth E~~consi der the
. ,
matter. . i .
9. PE-1178-78 - PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION: WOLFLAND, INC.
ZE- 43-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDIN TIAL •
The Board concurred with the Plarining Commission's recommendation to continue .
this preliminary plat to a later date. '
10. PE-1179-78 - NQRTHCREST ADDITION: WOLFLAND, INC.
' ZE- 44-7b - AGRICULTURAL TO S-CNGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to continue
this preliminary plat to a later date.
11. PE-1180-78 - ANCHOR SECURITIES N0. 5, REPLAT #1: PIONEER HOMES, INC.
ZE- 45-?8 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN
Trle Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve
the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes
of the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the environmental
review.
The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recocnmendation to
zone the prperty to the Agricultural Suburban zone upon the filing of the ;
final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending'
the filing of the final plat.
.
12. PE-1181-78 - VF.RA VIEW ESTATES : MC MILLAN
ZE- 46-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICIILTiJRAL SUBURSAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILX RESIDENTIAI
Having received a comn►unicatx.on in disagreement with the Planru.ng Commission's
recommendation for denial, the Board set a date of ~ ~
at '3-~ l'_~ , of sai.d day to fur~~~ier eonsider the matter.
. ,
.
13. PE-1182-78 - CASCADE HEIGHTS ADD:IT.LON : MC CLOSKEY
ZE- 47-78 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 2'0 MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURHAN '
The Board concurred with t;he Planiliiig Commission's recommendation to conti , nue
this preliminary plat to a later date. •:r .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby authorizea its chairman to sign Final
Declaration of Non-Significance for each item approved above, subject to compliance ,
with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinanca, Subsection 11.15•34o• .
• BY THE ORDER OF UiE BQARD THIS UAY OF G ~ r1978.
~
.`r
BQARD OF COUNTY COMNIISSIONFRS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY,, WASH 1NGTON
, NARRY M. I.q
,
~-W• CHkISTENS , . EN . .
Ina JERRY
. , .
' ATTEST. • KOPET
r VERNON W HLAND 1, : f
Clerk he Boar • • j
B Y : ~ .!Q/~ ' . • • •
'JA
Dep ty
~
' ~ r
~ • '
. ` 4L;;
V . t
' Y.
~
~
' BEFORE THE BOARD OF CUUNTY CUh1MISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING A CFIANGE IN )
A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THE FINAL )
PLAT OF PE-1002-76, MIDILOME ADDITION, ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND ZE-34-76, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE )
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; SPONSOR: TOMLINSON )
NOTICE IS HEREGY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners'of Spokane
County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M. ON DECEM6ER 11, 1978,
at its office in the County Courthouse to reevaluate its approval of a change
in the conditions of the above-mentioned final subdivision and zone reclassifi-
cation after having considered the-Environmental Impact Statement prepared for
, the entire Midilome project. The above-mentioned Midilome Addition is located
within the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 33, Township 25 North, 'Range 44 E.W.M.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing .
and present testimony in support of or in opposition to the Board's decision
to approve subject condition change, from on-site sewage disposal systems to
a public sewer system, in relation to the Environmental Impact Statement.
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 16 day of October, 1978. • ,
VERNON W. OHLAND
CLERK 0F TNE BpARD
.
l
BY
Ro,s'anne Montague, Deputy Cl erk
Ff•
r :
- - - - - - - - - - - - _ _-._-i;r. - -
r 3~it~~•~r«~ --7 n~ f ;3:, ± - r o : _ 1~: 2Sr19~`,^.► • 2:1 . a'
.lrsl.JT . rJ..tr.. . !/u'v , . . '7 . .?r..~l-l'' .----w . rJ0p1T~Is-T ~ ..v~ .es- +s.` _ . t , ~~i wa. ~ • , , , ~M:°.'~1►i' ,,,,~a,~ ~r
=t ~ 7 ~r• J. ~ ~ .4~ 1 ~t Y P. fra~ y ~
! li' ~y ` r! i a ~a,'~✓tQ~.f I M f
~ t ti T • ti 4 ~ ' . , f ` , - f~' _ 4 - ' ; .aF- .
• 'i ?
W~. _ i • , 'K }
ti. ' v_' . • ~ ' ~ ' t „v .3 * ~ ''S44= ♦ +w
, l M ' . '~F • - • ~,~~t'6y : ~ ` ~ay ~ - a?
s u~ ' ~ s ~ E ' i ' ~z * . x\ ~ y 'S tiT ' • a.:3'~"' ? py~ F
_ s r~~^ ` .~tYr~ ! _ ~ : ^ 'k• ; , ~ ' 3 `3
ti-
} ~ ,~y' •t w - ' p' r, ~ ~ ' C
W
R
M ♦..1
>
,
r
BEFORE THE BOARO OF COUNTY CONiMISSIONERS OF SPOKAfVE COUNTY, 1rJASHINGTON 'IN THE MATTER CONCERNIPJG PRELIMINARY }
SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION )
PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION, ) COMMISSI0NERS` DECISION
AND ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE )
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Sponsor - Tomlinson )
This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington to render its decision concerning the request of
Plidilome, Inc., c/o Robert Tomlinson, 4lest 606 Third Avenue, Spokane, '
. WA 99204 for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone re-
• classification; and
The Board havino received the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning
Commission to approve the preliminary plat, subject to findings and
conditions as contained in the Commission's minutes of September 21,
1978 (continued to September 28); and
' The Board having conducted its own public hearing on December 11, 1978,
at the request of Joan Honican, South 3904 Bowdish Road, Spokane, WA
and after.vis i ti ng the s i te and rev i evri ng the testi mony ; and
The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon
the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available
to the Board to approve PE-1168-78, Midilome First Addition.and.the related
zone change ZE-.13-78, Agricultural to Singl Family Residential, subject
to the Findings and Conditions as contained~in the Planning Commission
minutes and PROVIDED, that this approval shall be subject to the approval
of all other state, federal and local agencies with jurisdiction.
The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order,
, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more
definitively the Board's action in this matter. ~ • `
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 29 day of,January, 1979. •
~ VERNON W. ONLAPID
Clerk of t oard
by •
. R anne Montague, Deputy Cler
,
,
c
' .r
'
s r
'l
r v
~ •
`
Q
^a.n
{ r,sR o
~
a •
.Y ~ Y4,~~~~
~;p • . 4~., . ~ ~ ,
21 !i• . .V A• ('h~~•~( J~f`b . , . , Fl.
r , • ' . ',r ~ •
+d r • ' ; ' ~ c i{'} _
j ♦b s y~~'d~1~`41J*
~t~.T . ♦ 1 • C 1 ' - J -,d ~ 'dyQ.,~o
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260 . A
October 4, 1978
~
l
Nonorable Board of County Commissioners ~
Spokane County Court House
Spokane, WA, 99260
Gentlemen:
At the special hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Thursday,
September 28, 1978, at 10;00 A.M, to 11:55 A,M., reconvening at 1:30 P.M,, to
3:10 P.M., in the Hearing Room at N. 721 Jefferson, the enclosed actlon was
taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners, .
Planning Commission members present; Mr. Ted McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Abby
Byrne, Mrs. Jane Myers, and tiessrs, Culler, Kennedy, Quigley and Thomas.
Planning Staff present: Wallis D. Hubbard, Plat Administrator; Blanchard and
Johnson, recording secretaries. Engineer's office: Dobratz and Kennaly.
Health District: Prather. Prosecutor's office: George.
Sincerely,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
C,
Ted AcCoury, Chai rman
Fred L. Dayhar , Director of Planning
;
TMC:myb
Official minutes and record of action yf P taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at their special hearing
~ALE~
held on September 28, 1978.
t.
.
• ~
'4 rplr
. 4
~ ~
~ ~ .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Norih 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
September 27, 1978
Honorable Board of County Comriissioners
Spokane County Court House
Spokane, WA. 99260 ; Gentlemen:
' At the special hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Thursday,
' September 21, 1978, at 8:30 A.M,, to 12;05 noon, reconvening at 1;30 P,M „ to
6:10 P.M. in-the Hearing Room at N, 721 Jefferson, the enclosed action was
taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners.
: Planning.Commission members present: Mr. Ted McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Abby
Byrne, Mrs. Jane Myers, and Messrs, Culler, Kennedy, Quigley and Thomas,
- Planning staff present: Wallis D. Hubbard, Plat Administrator; John Stoeser
; of Short Plats; Blanchard and Johnson, recording secretaries. Engineer`s
~ office, Kennaly. Health District: Prather. Prosecutor`s office; Emacio,
' Sincerely,
~
~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
i
~
c-,
~
Ted McCoury, Chairman
;
~~z_ Dcr-
Fred L. Dayl rsh, Di ector of Planning
~ TMC:myb
I
' Official minutes and record of action
i
; taken by the Spokane County Planning ' Commission at their special hearing
held on September 21, 1978. .
:
~ •
,
;
~ .
a
;
_4
i . •
~
~
AA_
Q
. 'INUTES OF THE SPOKANE JNTY PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINu OF SEPTEMBER 20u, 1978
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did hold a special public
meeting on September 28, 1978, (continued from a special-public hearing of Septem-
ber 21, 1978) to consider the testimony and requests of a plat applicant and other
interested parties concerning the following referenced subdivision and zone reclas-
sification upgrading; and '
,
bJHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those
opposing a11 items af business; and
LdHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Myers, and Messrs. Culler,
Kennedy, Quigley and Thomas were in attendance for the entire proceedings, consti-
tuting a quorum at all times; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission fu11y considered the
'testimony given, the environmental review, and a11 other evidence presented, recom-
mends to the 8oard of County Commissioners the following:
PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION by Midilome, Inc. ,
, LE- 13-18, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL:
(Summary of special hearing of September 21, 1978: W. D. Hubbard pre-
sented Findings of the Staff with additional conditions of the County
Engineer which were read into the record at the meeting. Mr. 4Jillard
Sharp, representing the sponsor, presented history of and request of
approval for Midilome. The sponsor also testified. Mr. tidilliam Powell,
representing Mrs. Honnican, presented opposing testimony. Testimony was
still in progress at 6:00 P.M., when meeting was adjourned and continued
to the special hearing of September 28, 1978, at 10:00 A.M.)
Hearing continued on September 28, 1978, with Mrs. Joan Honnican being
a major speaker for the opposition, along with testimony by others in
opposition. Rebuttal was presented by the sponsor and his representatives.
That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving, adopts
the Staff's Findings dated September 21, 1918, along with conditions which
were added at the hearing and read into the record, as the Planning Commis-
sions's findings oT fact, EXCEPT that the following additional conditions
shall be added: ;
' l. Phase Five, or an equivalent thereof, be set aside until 440
propriate departments (D.O.E.; D.S.H.S.; County Nealth .
ap
and County Engineering departments) have decided if an ~
. additional drainfield is needed.
~
2. No lots may be sold prlor to lrinal written approval of
all required agencies.
(Motion to approve by 6yrne, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous "yes;"
3:10 P.M. PLAT HEARING ADJOURNED.
. ~
_ OATED TH IS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1978. 8y : Myrth Bl anchard, P1 at Secretary `•t ~ u
For : Ted McCoury, Pl anni ng Comm. Chai rman ~.'~R A
Fred L. Dayharsh, Planning Director~;j}(~`j~`,~~,
\r ,1 ♦j r 9 A~, \bi
.l
, , . • i . ~ ~ y ~.4
~ f
~
, FINDINGS
PE-1168-78 - Nlidilome First Addition: Mldilomet Ine.
ZE- 13-78 - Agricultural to Single Famil,y Residential
, PRELIMINARY SUBDNISION AND Z0'NE RECLASSIFICATIOPd 4 ~
Staff findings regarding PE-1168-78, Midilome First Addition: z
; The plat sponsor has not3fied the Planning Department that he tdishes to continue .
i this item to the March 1978 Planning Commission Agenda so as to allow the applicant
~ additional time to assess the plat proposal in regards to sewage disposal methods
,
~ available and the possible recommendation by the Planning Department Staff-for an
•
Environmental Impact Statement on this proposal. ~
~
~ .
~
~
~
i
~
~
• J : ~ L
. , l r
; re
' y i S t
. i'
f A S , + ~ , :'L/t~ i~ ~
~ • ,r y~~~
+ r
+
a ~ ~ V ~ • ; , q ~ ~ i . - ~
, ' "S~~`~~~~,• • t,~j' ~ ~ ~t!t'
,
STAFF FINDINGS - September 21, 1978
PE-1168-78 - MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION
ZE- 13-78 - Agricultural to Single ramily Residential
PRELIMINARY SUBDIUISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
.
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
-This preliminary plat proposal has had an Environmental Impact Statement prepared
for it. The final Environmental Impact Statement, including review comments, has
been published as of September 13, 1978. The purpose of the Environmental Impact
Statement is to provide a maximum amount of information to the decision makers.
including the Planning Commission. Any unmitigated, adverse impact identified in
the Statement, including review commentary in response to the draft impact state-
ment, can be considered grounds for the Commission to condition or deny the pro-
posal, pursuant to R.C.W. 43.21C,060.
A. Location
-Midilome subdivision is situated in the south central Spokane Valley, It is
east of the Dishman Mica Road and south of Opportunity, more specifically,
it is bounded by Pines, Bowdish Road, 32nd and 40th Avenue. CReference page 9
of the D.E.I.S.)
B. Proposal
-As the Planning Commission may remember, the proposal entails 25 acres, and
72 lots that have already been approved, The E.I,S, addresses the entire
plat, which with the lots approved, is for 160 acres, and a total of 425
lots, all for single family residences.
-The plat as presented today is for the remaining 353 lots at a gross density
of about 2.6 per acre, and a lot size of 10,500 to 11,500 square feet.
C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan
-The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of
the proposed plat area tvith no specific densities designated,
D. Existing Land Uses
-The land is vacant with approximately 60 acres in cultivation. (Reference
page 108 of the D.E.I.S.)
-Land to the north is residential in character with subdivisions such as
Kokomo townsite and Skyview acres at approximately the same density as the
proposed plat.
-To the west is the approved portion of Midilome and other subdivisions,
Aloha Addition and Castle Addition, extending to the Dishman Mica Road.
-South and east of the proposed plat, the land is in larger parcels of vacant
' and agricultural uses. Directly east across Pines Road, is the Chester
~ Elementary School. ~
E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses
,
}
-The proposed plat appears compatible with other residential use and complies
with recent and past Planning Commission decisions in the area.
,
.,A
~
~
~
,
STAFF FINDINGS - September 21, 1978 Midilome First Addition
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
-Those items that are normally covered by the Planning Staff within this
section of the Findings have not been addressed, as the staff feels they are
considered in the final draft of the Northcrest Environmental Impact State-
ment. The staff recommends that the Environmental Impact Statement be
retained in the plat f11e as an official part of these Staff Findings.
III. ZONING _
. -Pending approval of the final plat, it would be appropriate to reclassify the
zoning to Single Family Residential,
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
-Reference the Midilome Environmental Impact Statement.
V. CONDITIONS
If approval is granted, the Staff recommends the following conditions.
Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced
in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard Conditions for Approval of
Preliminary Plats," August, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department.
NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter.
. • ~
-P-l, P-23, P-35 P-43, P-5, P-62 P-71 P-8, P-9, (October 1, 1979.)
-A-1 (Engineering conditions not received at time of printing.)
-H-3 , H-4
-That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43,21C.080 R.C,W., and the
Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commission-
ers, with regard to the preliminary plat approval, as instructed by the Planning
Department Staff.
•-That all public well sites in the plat shall provide for Model Irrigation District
control-of an area within a 150-foot radius of each public well.
-No privately-owned wells shall be authorized in the plat.
-That a storm drainage plan and the sewer plan will be approved by the Spokane County
Utilities Department prior to finalizing the final plat.
.,2a..
.
i ,
w
,
STAFF FINDINGS - September 21, 1978 Midilome First Addition
V. CONDITIONS
(NOTE: Following are the conditions which were added at the Hearing of
September 21, 1978, of the Planning Commission.)
-That the Department of Ecology must review the sewerage system and disposal
facilities for approval or disapproval.
-Engineers Conditions:
• -E-15 E-29 E-31 E-41 E-5, E-6, E-71 E-85 E-9
-That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of
the County Engineer. Existing County Roads providing direct access to lots of
the plat shall be curbed to the standards of the County Engineer.
-No direct access from lots to 32nd Avenue
-That road improvement requirements, including sidewalk construction along
arterials, will also apply to Phase One (Mililome Addition) as indicated in the
Environmental Impact Statement.
'r
~
2 C
MINUTES OF THE SPOKA UNTY PLANNING COMMISSION HEA • OF SEPTEM6ER 21, 1978
,
. WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did hold a special public
" meeting on September 21, 1978, to consider the testimony and requests of two plat
• applicants and other interested parties concerning the following referenced sub-
,
divisions, zone reclassification upgradings, and a short plat appeal; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and
those opposing all items of business; and
ti
; WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Byrne, P1rs. Myers, and h1essrs. Culler,
' Kennedy, Quigley and Thomas were in attendance for the entire proceedings, consti-
tuting a quorum at all times; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission fully considered the
testimony given, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recom-
mends to the Board of County Commissioners the following:
The Chairman announced the hearing would address itself to preliminary subdivision
applications and zone reclassifications, along with an Appeal, promptly at 1:30 PM,
of a Short Plat Subdivision, with those items presented by W. D. Hubbard, Plat
Administrator, as to preliminary plat applications; and John Stoeser as to the
short plat appeal; and zach sponsor or his representative; followed by favorable
and/or opposing testimony from the audience, with rebuttal allotived the sponsor.
A. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
l. PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION by Wolfland, Inc.
ZE- 44-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary
plat request be DEiVIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This request was heard throughout
the morning and a portion of the afternoon, following the short plat appeal.
W. D. Hubbard presented Findings of the Staff, with Bob Bethards presenting
information on behalf of the sponsor, Vince Seipp, who also presented data
concerning Northcrest Addition. There was considerable testimony in oppo-
sition, with a petition bearing 150 signatures against the proposed plat,
along with several letters related to various facts concerning the plat
being presented to the Commission by the opposition. Discussion by the
Planning Commission and testimony by the sponsor, representatives of the
Nealth District, Engineer's office, Prosecuting Attorney's office; and
members of the opposition centered around the following topics: access
roads to the plat; traffic on Argonne Road; density of the proposed plat;
the requirement by the Health District for a sealed lagoon; uncertainty
regarding the location of the drainfield proposed by the sponsor; heavy
concentration of nitrates in the wells in the area; statistics on automo-
bile and train traffic; soil and water runoff; erosion that comes with
construction; the "208 Study;" and various fiactors in the E.I.S.
A motion to approve, providing all problems could be met and solved, was
lost for want of a second. A motion to continue until after the "208
Study" is published was also lost for want of a second. A motion to con-
tinue for ten working days to determine issues of water quality, sewage
and density, was also lost for want of a second. A motion to table the
matter indefinitely was,secondeo, vrith two in favor to continue, and five
voting against a continuance. '
(Motion to deny without prejudice by Byrne, seconded by Quigley. Vote was
six for the denial, with the Chair abstaining.) .
-1-
cont'd.
. ~
$PPPLANNING COMMISSIOiV Hth..~NG t~IINUTES
September 21, 1978
12:05 Noon - Luncheon Meeting
~
+ Topics of discussion included:
~ Responsibility of the Planning Dept. with regard to the E,I.S.
Format of the E.I.S.
~ Special Hearings requested by plat sponsors
~ Homestead and Mt. Baldi on the same Agenda - recess and continue
; another day?
~ Planning Commission Chairman and Director of Planning should
a coordinate and plan an agenda that could be handled in one day,
~ Long Range Planning
~ -
~
1:30 P.M. - Reconvene
' B. SHORT PLAT SUBOIVISION aPPEAL
.
~ 1. SP-78-059, Short Plat by J. Bevan. Appeal by Gaubinger. That the short
plat be DENIED. Because of a statement in the dedication of Myron Estates
a that no more than one structure be placed on any one lot without filing a
;
# replat, and also stated lots in this plat would remain one acre in size,
~
~ the question was raised as to whether or not a short plat is considered
j a replat. The issue remained that the area was intended for one-acre
'lots, which was a decision made with consideration of the neighboring
Ponderosa plat.
~ (Motion to deny the short plat by Culler, seconded by Byrne. Voting was
~ five.in favor of the denial, with two opposed.)
~ Y
~ C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
.
~
' 2. PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION by 14idilome, Inc.
j ZE- 13-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEiVTIAL: That the preliminary
~
plat request be CONTINUED to September 28, 1978, at 10:00 A.M. 6ecause
' earlier items on the agenda had consumed a good portion of the day, the
' motion was made by Byrne, seconded by Quigley, that the Commission hear
' Midilome until 6:00 P.M., and to continue to another day if not concluded
~ by that hour. Vote was six in favor of that motion, with one opposed.
W. D. Hubbard presented Findings of the Staff with additional, conditions
" •of the Engineering Department. Mr. Willard Sharp, representing the sponsor,
~ presented history of and request of approval for Mililome. The sponsor also
j , testified. Mr. William Powell, representing Mrs.Honnican, presented opposing
~ testimony. Testimony was still in progress at 6:00 P.M.
.
~ (Motion to continue until September 28 at 10:00 AM by Thomas, seconded by
~ Quigley. Vote in favor of motion was unanimous.) ,
~
~
6:10 P.M. - 14EETING ADJOURNED
~ OATED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1978 By: Myrth B1anchard
~ Recording Secretary ; For: Ted McCoury, Planning Comm. Chairman
~ Fred L. Dayharsh, Planning Director .
a i r , ~ •
,
t"-
• 1 , , V-jkk~ ~
~ '
~
t~
^ •V " / ~ ~ ~
0NO ' 13~.~ .
.
~yat.3 0
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
. ~aF
,~•'IN THE MATTER OF TNE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM }
pa,t THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ) RESOLUTION
CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S SPECIAL HEaRING ) •
y,.OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1978. )
.
~ WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, pursuant to the provisions
of the revised Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620, shall upon receipt of any recom-
mended official control or amendment-thereto, at its next regular public meeting set the
date for a public meeting where it may, by ordinance, adopt or reject the official con- '
•'~'trol or amendment; and . ; -
i,.
sm-.WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by Resolution
No. 78 1334 acknowledge receipt of the recomrnendations from the Spokane County Planning .
~Commission concerning its hearing of September 28, 1978; and
.
. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by said resolution
; set the 16th day of October to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission
concerning its September 28, 1978 hearing, a copy of said recommendations are attached
hereto and inco.rporated herein by reference.
a,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
Washington, that based upon the information available to the Board and the testimony
at that meeting, the following action was taken:
• PE-1168-78,'MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION: Midilome, Inc.
ZE- 13-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
• Having received a cominunication in disagreement with the Planning Commission's
. recommendation for approval of the preliminary plat request, the Board set a
date of at to further consider
. the matter.
BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS • DAY OF 1978.
~
. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
. OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
. , _ .
HARRY M. LARNED, CHM.
. -f~Ev .
1ERRY C. KOPET :
~
v . • p•.- ~.w w r ►..ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND C1 of the Board
. ~
. 6y •
. ~
• Deputy , •
r
4 s i.
a
. ' . s
. ,t
~ : r~~' ' , ti'
/ .'w0, ~ti , 'j ~'~•v ` d
jt;, ~ • k . Y,t , • ' ' !T`'a 1+ ~4~,~~
y(,~ t p ~ ~ . • 1 , ' . a S(~ t~~,+,`~/*, /
y ' • ' ' ' . i y , ,Y
r• +
\
/ F
,
BEFORE THE BOARD UF CUUNTY CUMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY )
SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION )
PE-1168-78, P-tIDILOME FIRST ADDITION, ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE )
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; SPONSOR: TOP1LIiVSON )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
Washington, wil 1 hold a publ ic hearing at 3:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11 , 1978, at
its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above-mentioned preliminary
subdivision and zone reclassification on the following described property: , Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. NE 1/4 of ,
Section 33, Spokane County, G,lashington, EXCEPT Midilome
Addition, Also EXCEPT R/W for 32nd Avenue, also EXCEPT
R/W for Pines Road, also EXCEPT R/W for Bowdish Road.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion along with the proposal will
~ be tne Envi ronmental l,,ipact Statement.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing
and present testimony in support of or in opposition to an appeal on said matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners.
, .
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 16 day of October, 1978.
VERNON W. OHLAND >CLERK OF 75/~BIARD
' . i
B Y
Ros~nne Montague, Deputy Cle~
.
. .
. . La
f
t'
,itf .
• ' . . .
~~'ii! "A~"' ~Y'1 _ ~ r v ' ; .r A1 , y - - . , .t • a } '
Yi - - WF'A-r. 1rE~1~ . , - ' _i . . . . ' J/"A
~tr'i y~•~,~ 'y• ' .$a~, 4 L , .~1
f * T ~ ` ^ • iAI df
r ,S. _ . . . ' . t ~~'~~~a ' °S ,,4 ~ ~ -w~, r
r ~s , ` ~ ~ ~ '~s_` + ~ _ • ~i~,y • ' ~j r
- 'tf:, : ' f``tL f' ~R i x * ;r. • ,~,7
f ~ ~ + ! ~ s... a i}►„ s' -
'',r . r ~4v^ , _'`~x ~ ` T ~ i' ~ ` J ~•r~ 3 1
' : • ~ t .7-~ + Y .~v , ~ r
. ' -It - ' , t~ a 'I M t ~ 1s, '
j a ~ ~ ' tSll% t• ~ '~5• . J ~j ~ ~'L.s r ' 1 e~'•
.
, . . t Tf
- - ss' w a r► r,~..h„ .~-~fu.• ~p. A.ff/3hr ° ' .7.
i i. - r :a~ ' v ,
r
mwdmlia
5
'
~ -
'
I J 0204
BOARD OF COUNTY COt1M I SS I ONERS OF SPOKAtJE COUNTY, WASH I NGTON
FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDItJG PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AtJD Z014E RECLASSIFICATION,
PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION; ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY
RESIDE(JTIAL.
WHEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Commission did, after public hearing .
on September 21, 1978 (continued to September 28,1978) forward to the Board of
County Commissioners a recommendation that the preliminary plat to be known as
' Midilome First Addition (PE-1168-78) be approved, and,
• WHEREAS, Joan Honican, S 3904 Bowdish Road, did request a special hearing
before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and testimony against
the recommendation of the Planning Commission to approve the above-described pre-
liminary plat and zone reclassification; and,
WHEREAS', The Board of County Commissioners did hold a public hearing on
,
December 11, 1978, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and
testimony and request of the plat sponsor, objectors, and other interested parties;
and,
1JHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those
opposing the above-described preliminary plat proposal and zone reclassification, the
Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the testimony
given, the records and minutes of the Planning Commission, the Environmental lmpact
Statement and all other evidence presented, and further having personally acquainted
themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the con-
clusions of the Planning Commission were generally valid and sufficient, andt
IJOtiJ, THEREFORE, The Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the ~
preliminary plat to be known as Midilome First Addition and zone reclassification J
upgrading to Single-Family Residential should be and hereby is approved, subject•to
r°
the Staff Findings and Conditions in the Planning Commission Minutes and PROVIDED, ~
that this approval shall be subject to the approval of all other state, federal
and local agencies with jurisdiction. '
' DATED TH I S ~.3 DAY OF , 19?• ~
~ - ;
BOARD OF COUfJTY-:EQM+I sS tOtdERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON •
- ~oY 1N. CHRtSTENS H. CHM. _
1ERRY C. KOPET - . , . . .
ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND . •
Clerk of Board
.
. , .
. :
By:
~ . . ,
. Y B0A12D OI? COI= COtl-LZSSIONEtS OF SPOKAIJr COiTNT}Ct WASJIINGTC7N
F7J7DI11G5 AiND ORDEM IN TIIT; TV1T'I'FR OF T11C 7ll]tESHOLD DL'UtMINATIO14 CONCIIIIi?!I?J(} TiiE
PRELIi-ffIJARY PLI1T AtJD ZONE RECLIISSIFICIITICI?J, PE- 1053-76 , GUnIRIE' S VAI..L.~,'YVIEW
Bth ADDITION AND PE-1086-77, GU'Tl-iRIE' S V1lL,L.EY VIEW 10th A.DDITICBJ, NOW COrSIT1ED
AND REFFRRED TO J1S PE-1086-77, 14A.LLOY' S 11llDITI(7N; ZE-132-76 AND ZE-46-77, BO'Il-i
AGR ICUL'IURA.L TO SINGLE FAMILY RES I DL:NTI1tL .
WHEREAS, I.7rs. Frarilc Gerimonte, did by letters dated 14arch 30 t 1978 and
April 7, 197E3, request a special public hearing before the Board of County
Cocrmiesi.onera for the purpose of presenting evidence aild testimony against the
Board'a 18auanae of a proposed declaratiun of non-signil'icance with reFard to
, .
the change of condition for Malloy's Additien to fill an area for approxirnately
62 homes, creating an 11 acre barrow sump and permitting septic tanks rather
ttlan a sewage collection system; and4
WMIEAS, the Plasining Director did Pdvise the Board of County Commieeioners
by memorandum dated April 17, 1978 to schedule a hearing for the reconeider-
ing of the proposed declaratiotl of non-eignlficance, and consequently the plat
proposal itself; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of County Comuieaiuner did hold a public hearing on
the reconsideration of the proposed declaration of non-eignificanee and to take
testimony oP the Plat aponsor, objectore, and other intereeted partieo; and,
w'HEEtEAS, at eaid hearing opportunity wae afforded those favoring and
those opposi.pg the above described proposed declaration of non-significance
and change of eondition to the prelimindry p'-at and zona change, the Board of
County Comenissionera of 3pokane County havin6 fully con9idered the testimony
given, the records and minutes of the Planning Coranission, the Planning Depart-
ment staff's recorranended oonditions to which the change of conditiona for
A1a1'loy's /i,ddition would be sub,ject, the environmental review, and all other
evidence presented, and further having previously per9onally acquainted them-
selves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that sufficent
data was preeented to raise eerious queetions with regard to the project's
~ mpact on the physical environnient particu.tarly itt light of the recent Aopel 1 ate .
and Supreme Court environmental decisions.
NOW, T'H ~E- OIIE, the Boci.rd of County Comtniesioners does conolude that a
declaration of eignificaiice should be and hereby ie iesued by the Chairrnan for
the preliminary plut known ae Mcilloy'e Addition, PE-1086-77 and zone reelass-
ification to Single Fanu.ly Residential; and any and all previously iseued pro-
posad or final negative threshold detercn.inations are hereby reecinded.
,
.
: ' r' f ` ~ re" ' `,r~' ~.r • .~t , ` ' - ~
r' • r ` l ~ ' ' ! v ~~w~ - a~ti'~ .t~.°~++t': ~'iC.~i
FURTHERMURE, the subject pl at i s i.o be remanded to the Pl anning Conuni ss ion
for a public liearing with a final Environinental Impact Statement, at such time as
one becomes available, and aftier legal notification of the hearing as per standard
Planning Department procedures for a proposed preliminary plat.
DATED THIS DAY 0F 1978•
,
/
►
, BOARD OF COUr•JTY COMMI SS I ONERS
~OF SPOKANE COUNTti', w'ASH I NGTON .
1
r
,
• ~ .
~
~ • .
,
.
-
ATTEST:
VERtdON W. OIiLAND
C f Boar
/ ♦ r
.
.
'3 - ' . • . , • '
. ~ ~
SPOKANE COLiNTY PLUriVING COMMISSION
PI 811 Jefferson
Spokane, 'rJashington 99201
April 4, 1978
Honorable Board of County Commissioners '
Spokane County Court House
Spokane, WA 99201
Gentlecnen: •
At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on
Thursday, March 30, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M., reconvening at 2:00
P.M. to 5:10 P.M. in the Health Building Auditorium Room 140. The enclosed
action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners.
Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Thomas and Mr. Kennedy.
Plarining Staff present: Dayharsh,Bethards,Fergen, Davis, hiosher, Weschet and Brumleve.
Engineer's Office: Kennaly and Legat. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio.
Sincerely,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COM1IISSION
• Ted McCoury, Chairma.n
Fred L. Dayharsn, Director of Planning
FLD/sb •
Official minutes and record of action
taken by the Spokane County Planning ,
Commission at their regular hearing
held on Thursday March 30, 1978.
~a
. ~ .
- . ~
MINUTES OF THE SPOKAIyE COUNTY PLANNING COPf tI`1IISSION HEARING OF MARCH 30, 1978.
47HEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did hold a public meeting on
March 30, 1978 to consider the testimony and requests of several applicants,
objectors and other interested parties concerning the below referenced subdivisions,
- zone classification upgradings, extensions of tlme, and other items of business and,
IrIEEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favorino and those
opposing all items of business, and'
WHEREAS, Nir. McCoury, Mr. Thomas, Mr. Quigley and Mr. Ken.nedy were in atten-
dance and constituted a quorum, .arLd,
W'HEREAS, the Spokane County Plan.ning Commission fully considered the testimony
given the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recommends to the
Board of County Commissioners the following:
A. Disc lssion Items .
1. Report oQ rQmmiSs1QnP.rS' ArriQn:
• a) PrPlimi arv Plar Ant)P+als ,
Bob Bethards of the staff presented a report to the Commission
members regarding the number of preliminary plats which had
been reviewed by the Planning Commission during the past year
and the number of appeals which were heard by the Board of County
• Commissioners. Of the total 121 preliminary plats reviewed, 37
were appealed. About 70% received the same recommend'ation from
rhe Board of County Commissionecs. The Board only ceversed less
restrictive action on five different plats.
,
b) S,hort Plat Ordinanc-P,
Mr. Bethards reported that the Short Plat Ordinance became
effective on M,3rch 13, 1978. The appeal prucedure in the Shor~
Plat administration is heacd before the Placlning Commission and
then forwarded to the aoard of County Commissioners. There ?^.?R,7-=
also been some other minor changes in the adopted ocdinz^ce.
c) Road- Sr, • .
Mr. Bethards said a copy of Road Standards which have been
adopted by the Board of County Commissioners will be sent to the
Planning Commission. It is planned that these will be discussed
l
at the April heacing. :
_1_ •
/
.
,~l..
2. commis gion Con,;erns ;
a) Pron-ose~l Am~~nrlnient rc) tI-(- So C;nm,nty Zonina O i n o
,
to Aciri a vILaj SrnUcLj(-s Conte►- as a (bnditional ITa2 in t2ae
Aq i 11 ural .ono-
Tom D3vis of the staff infortned tlie, Commission that Mr, Paul
Rayburn wished to request that the use of a Vital Records Center
be made a Conclitional Use in the Agricultural Zone, and that the
staff be directed to advertise for this amendment to the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance for consideration at the April 21st
• heacing ,
In explaining the desire for this use further, Mr, Paul Raybucn,
South 3518 Lincoln Drive, Spokane, commented that there is not
a vital re;,ord center presently located in the Northwest. The
intended location is to be one mile north of D_-aep Cceek at Sprague ~
and Ritchie Roads.
Mr. Thomas moved, Mi-. Quigley seconded, that the propo5ed amendment
to the Spokane County Zoning Orciinance bc advertised for public hearing
on the April agenda, Motion carried unanimously,
b) Pla ina .nqine?rina Cn5_a,
Mr, Eugene Prather of the Spokane County Health District requested
that the Commission be made aware and review the engineering costs
involved in platting. At the present time the only consideration befng
given is at the initial costs and not the long-range costs which car, '_Je
involved. ' -
c) G i iz en Pacticiz2a tion Undate Repoct,
r Gary Fergen of the staff presented a report on the current status of
citizen participation. The "Operation Insight" flyer was updated in
• March and sent to the regular mailfng list and also to the granges and
to the. County libraries . Mr, Fergen also cited a list of groups and
organizations at which presenLations have been made by the staff znd
those which are scheduled for the immediate future.
3. Five Mile PrQ„ar .esS Rg t-.rt:
Mr. Quigley, Commission member, asked whd[ plan was voted on at the last
meeting at Five Mile. ML , Fergen teplied that the citizens had voted on
Plan "D" , The Five Mile Goals and Policies report is to be sent back to the
Planning Commission front the Board of County Commissioners afrer they ha:•e
recommended their changes.
. ~
_ 2 _
- - ~ - -
.Yw 1~ f
i
iL
Mr, Dayharsh, Planning Director, ask-ed the Comrnission for direction to
proceed on consideration of the Five Mile issue. Mr. Quigley moved,
Mr. Kennedy seconded, that the Planning staff be directed to prepare a final
plan for Five Mile based upon the maps and the goals and policies pretty much
as developed as per the Citizens Committee from Five Mile and as per Lhe :'_na'_
vote. Motion carried unanimous ly .
4. Hear,,L s E_saminE r Cri111I111trF'P C)rciinance:
Mr. D3yharsh said thdt the staff is in the process of drafting up the suggestieas
• f or the Hearings Examiner Committee Ordinance, and asked if the Planning
Commission would like to have this for their consideration at the second cub''_c
hearing in April. Mr. Ttiomas moved, Mr. Quigley seconded, that the staf` ie
directeC to complete the wording of the Hearings Examiner Committee Ordi^arsce
and present it to the members of the Commission on their agenda for the
Apnl 28th public hearing, vlotion curried unanimously,
5. C:ommiktees nf the SQghanp Counky lanninq CQmnlissiQn:
Mr. McCoury, Chairman, announced the following committees of the
Commis s ion: '
Work Proqram aric~ Lnrig-RanaP Pl~tnnina:
Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman
Glenn Quigley William Main
Policy CQmmi tee:
Eldon Thomas
Grace Rawlings •
Abby Byrne ,
. ' . BPaianal Planninq Confe«nce:
Grace Rawlings, until her retirement, at which time
. the representative will be Ted McCoucy,
Li-i11L~ T16P rnqlmlttP P (r...TLI2ce h. n s ivPPla.p T T nrta r e;
At the present time this function will be considered by
the Long-Range Planning Committee, until such time it •
should become too burdensome.
~
6. RgguPst for Addirional Acenda Information:
Mr. McCourl sugyested that a pictuce of the plat be enclosed with an
agenda page so that the Commission would be able to tell where duolexes ,
single family residences and multiple unfts were to be located,
rc;.
1) -
v~..~ -....qp~rr-~.a~t..~'-.,, .r ~ ` - -
r . ~
r
7. PE-1087-77, SVITAN ACRES REPLAT #1; SVITAN, and ZE-47-77, AGRICULTURAL
SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That .an extension of time be •
granted to April 1, 1979. (Motion by Thomas, seconded by Quigley. Vote
was unanimo us) . -
.
8. PE-109 0-77 , FOREST GREEN SU BDIVISIO N REPLAT 11: WARD, and ZE-5 0- 77 ,
UNCLASSIFIED TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That an extension of time be
granted to April 1, 1979 .(M ction by QuiglEy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was
unanimous).
9. PE-:153-77, NORTHWOOD 2IVD ADDITION: ANDERSON, and ZE-183-77, AGRI-
CULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be
approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning
Commission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findings,
dated March 301 1978 except that the following conditions shall be incorporated:
That the wording on page 3, paragraph S, of the Staff's Findings, dat Ed March 30,
1978 read: That prior to the release of building permits for any lot within fihe plat
proposal, all building materials and methods of construction shall be reviewed and
approved by the Countv BuildinQ Official $o as to mitigate any possible noise
conflicts that may result from approval of this proposal within an area that may
experience abnormally high aircraft noise and activlty. Also, that the Sepa
Notice of Action, be included in those conditions.(vlotion by Quigley, seconded
by Kennedy. Vote was unanimous).
10. PE-1155-77, NORTHtiVOOD 3rd ADDITION: GUNNING, and ZE-193-77, AGRICULTURA
TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be approved and
in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings
of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findings, dated Nlarch 30,
1978', except that the following conditions shall be incorporated: That the wording
on page 3, paragraph S, of the Staff's Findings, dated March 30, 1978 read: That
prior to the release of building permits for any lot within the plat proposal, all
building materials and methods of construction shall be reviewed and approved
by the Countv Buildinct Official, so as to mitigate any possible noise conflicts
, that may result from approval of this proposal within an area that may experiai ce
abnormally high aircraft noise and activity. Also, that the SEPA Notice of
Actiog be included in those conditions.(Motion by Kennedy, seconded by
Thomas. Vote was unanimous) .
11. PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION: MIDILONIE, INC., and ZE-13-78,
AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FANIIL'I RESIDENTIAL; Tnis item is continued until
such time as the environmental impact statement is prepared. (Motion by Thomas, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous). ^
12. PE-1172 - 78 , MICA PARK: C. FRITZ NELSO N, and ZE-17- 78 ,AGRICU LTURAL TO
SINGLE FAVIILY RESIDENTIAL AND/OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND/OR MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAnJ: That the preliminary plat request be approved,
4
- - - - _
~ . . .
. - A
~ •
r
PE-1172-780 MICA PARK (Contd) • , ,
and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission
findings of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findings, dated
March 30, 1978 except that the following conditions shall be incorporated:
That the plat sponsor work with the engineer's office and the Planning Staff
to determine whether or not a redeslgn of the plat would be appropriate.(Motion
by Thomas, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous).
13. PE-1161-77, SUNSET MEADOWS SUBDIVISION: SWANSON C/O GREEiNNVOOD REALTY,
and ZE-203-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That this
preliminary plat be denied without prejudice, applicant may resubmit plat with
lower density. (Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was unanimous).
14. PE-1170-78, COLUUIBIA PARK 1ST ADDITION: BONUCCELLI, and ZE-15-78,
AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: As NIr. Quigley and Kennedy
were not present during the February 24, 1978 Planning Commission hearing,
and did not hear this preliminary plat proposal, the Planning Commission could
not vote on this ite m. Therefore, no action was taken.
15. PE-1178-78, PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION: WOLFLAND'• INC., and ZE-43-78,
AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTUR.AL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEIVTIAL:
T hat this item be continued to the April 19 78 hearing because of a prior •
committment of the applicanfi. The Planning Department will pay all readvertising
costs.(Motion by Thomas, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous).
16. PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION: tiVOLFLAND, INC., and ZE-44-78, AGRI-
CULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That thzs item be continued until
the April 1978 hearing. (Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was
unani mo us ) .
17. PE-1180-78, ANCHOR SECURITIES No. S, REPLAT nl: PIONEER HOM£S,. INC., and
ZE-45-781 AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURflAN: That this preliminary
plat request be approved and in so apprnving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the
Planning Commission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the
Staff' s finding s, dated March 30, 19 7 8, except that the follotiv ing conditions s hall
be incorporated: that on page 11C of the Staff's findings, the word"should" should
be changed to"shall" , in the state ment about the plat dedication.(Motion by
Thomas, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous) .
18. PE-1181-78, VERA VIEW ESTATES: MC MILLAN, and ZE-46-78, AGRICULTURAI, TO
AGRICLILTURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: This this
preliminary plat be denied without prejudice, applicant may resubmit plat with
lower dens ity .(Motion by Tho ma s, seconded by Kennedy. Vot was unanimq us) .
-5-
~ Aft-
.
19. PE-1182-78, CASCADE HEIGHTS ADDITION: MC CLOSKEY, and ZE-47-78, SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBA'kf That this item be
continued until the April 1978 hearing.(Motion by Kennedy, seconded by
Quigley. Vote was unanimous). ,
,
Planning Staff present: Bethards, Dayharsh, Davis, Fergen, Mosher, Wesche,
~ and Brumleve. Engineer's Office: Kennaly and Legat. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio
DATED THIS 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 19 78 .
_ L
, BY: Stephanie Brumleve Recording Secretary
FOR: Ted McCoury
Planning Commission Chairman
Fre d L. Da yhars h
Director of Planning
.
. ,
. ~
'
- , .
. ,
6_ ~
-
_ - - . . . .
'
.
4
d
, FINDINGS - March j0, 1978 • . ,
PRELIMINARY SIIBDIVISION AND ZONE REGLASSIFICATION a CONTINUED ITIlM
FE-1168-78 - Midilome First Additlon: Midilome! Inc.
ZE-13-78 - Agricultural to Sin~le Farnil,y Residential
. Staff Findings regarding PE-1168-78 -Midilome First Addition: .
I. As the Commission may recall, this item was continued to todays hearing from the ;
February 24, 1978 Planning Commisslon docket. The applicant requested that
. continuation so as to allow him adci.itional time to assess the plat proposal in
regards to sewage disposal methods available a.nd the possible recommendation
by the Planning Staff for an environmental izpact statement on this proposal.
r
5 .
II. The applicant has agreed to the Planning Staff's request for the need, for an
' environmental impact statement for this proposal and one is currently being
prepared.
, III. The Planning Staff recommends that this item be continued until such time as
the final environmental impact statement is prepared.
~
- • .
. .
,
. ~
. , . .
- •~~~y 4
~ Yo
A~,• • , ~ . , ~ '-I~` ^ , ~ >