PE-1168-78 & ZE-13-78
sTar~. o ~ % c
0 oP y`~ STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP4RTATION
4 - x W A S H I N G T O N Highway Adrrunistrahon Budding, Olympia, Washington 98504 206/7536005
Dix Lee Ra
~ isas ~ y y
Gouernor August 18, 1978
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 Jef ferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
Spokane County
Niidilome Subdivision
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
,
We have completed our review of the subject document and feel the document
addresses adequately the impacts to either existing or proposed transporta-
tion facilities in the area.
Thank you for the opportunity to revieca this information.
Sincerely,
ROBERT S. NIELSEN
Assistant Secretary
Public Transportation
and Planning
By: WM. P. ALBOHN
Environmental Planner
RA:rb °
WPA,WBH - R ECEIVED
cc: W. R. Horning
H. B. Ashf ord AU G~ 1 1978
Environmental Section
SPOKANE COUNTY
PtANNIN6 DEPARTMENT
aEcElIv E
~u G 21'19i8
SPOKANE ~O"~jENT
PLANNING DEPART
-4~ 3
✓
. ~
n
R E C E V E D I September8, 1978
SEP 0 8 1978
T0: Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Dir"pNE COUNTY
Spokane County P1annftXNNWt1y~p-kRTMENT
FROM: Gary Kennaly, Planning and Traffic Diviaion Engineer
SUBJECT: Draft E.I.S. Review: Midilome Subdivision -
Circulation and Traffic Operatione
The folloaing comments are provided for your review and conaideration:
D. 9 Impact Summary: Descrivtion of The Propoaed Action,:
Paragraph four indicatea no sidewalks are proposed. Preaent County policy
includes eidewalk conatruction along arterial routes, including neighborhood
collector arterials in aubdivieiona. Since this project ie bounded on all four
sidea by either existing or propoaed arterial9, sidewalka ehould be included ae
integral part of roaduay development.
p. 16 Impact Summarv - 4. Transportation/Circulation;
State HighWay S.R. 27 (State highuay portion of Pinea Road from 16th Avenue
north to Interatate 90 (S.R. 90)) should also be liated as a primary north-eouth
traffic carrier connecting to S.R. 90. Neither Pines Road nor Dishman-Mica R,oad
provide direct accese to S.R. 90 but do provide direct accesa to S.R. 27 end the
Argonne-Mullen couplet reapectively uhich in turn do provide direct acceee to
S.R. 90.
pt 4 ProbablQ Impact of the Propoaed Action - 4. TransportQtion/Circulation:
Same comment 8a page 9 comment regarding eideualk conatruction along
arterials. -
p. 27 Measuree to Mitigate Adverae Impacts - 4. Transportation/Circulation:
To date carpooling programs have not been aupported by the general public and
would have little impact on mitigating the traneportation impact generated by this
`i
. _2-
Fred Dayharsh E C E I V E
Re: Midilome Subdivision - R Circulation and Traffic Operationa
S E P 0 81978
SPOKANE COUNTY
project. By increasing the size of lots and thereby reduBlANIUNnpIWTCKEaqte,
the reaulting amounta of generated traffic and impact on the exiating road eystem
will be reduced accordingly.
p. 113 Elementa of Human Environment -4. Tranavortation/Circulation:
Same comment ae for page 16.
p. 114 Base map ahould be corrected re: County road namea and State high-
Way deeignationa.
p. 11~ b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action:
Same comment ae page 9 comment regarding sideualk construction along
arteriale.
General Comment:
On a portion of the proposed Pine Road frontage and on all of the proposed
l.Oth Avenue frontage only a half - 301 wide - right-of-uay is ahown. In both
casea a full 601 uide right-of-way plus full improvemente aill be required
prior to proceasing a final plat proposal for thoae tvo apecific areae.
Also, on a portion of the property located immediately eouth of this propoeal
a preliminary plat PE 1086,, Malloy Addition,, ha9 been revieued by the County
Commiseioners. The road designa of the tuo proposals must be compatible and there
may be a need to make design adjuatments in this proposal to obtain this compat-
ibility.
d
v v
AIR POILUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
POKANE
t ~J August 30, 1978
OUNTY
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Di rector
Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
We have reviewed the draft Envi ronmental Impact Statement for the
Mi di 1 ome Subdi vi si on. We concur wi th the overal l fi ndi ngs of the ai r
quality section, with the addition of the following comments:
a) The proponent's intentions on paving 40th Avenue are not
clear. Unpaved, this road could prove to be a substan-
tial emitter of particulates. We ask that the proponent
clarify his intentions on this matter.
b) We wish to emphasize that with proper design and main-
tenance, package sewage treatment pl ants shoul d gi ve off
no odors.
c) We al so ask the proponent to s ubmi t a more detai 1 ed out-
line of plans to abate dust during construction.
We appreciate the opportunity to review and comment on this draft
Environmental Impact Statement.
Si ncerely,
William T. Murphy
Ai r Qual i ty Engi neer
WTM/1 t
/
ADDRE55 REPLY TO: SPOKANE GOUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
W EST 1101 COLLEGE, ROOM 234 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
Spo ~dne County
He(Dn DiStrict
lr.'ry^ ► ' J'
West 1101 College Avenue Spolicane, Washington 99201
September 8, 1978 ~ .
Mr. Dayharsh
county Flanning Direetor R E C E I V E
Sp~kane Coanty P3anning Commf ssion S~ 1t1
N. 811 Je~'ferson Sp~kane, WA 99201
SPOKANE CDUNTY
RE: Midi1ame subdivision - Draft EIS PIANNIHG DEPARTMENT
llear Mr. Dayharsh :
The Spokazae County Hea.l.th Di~~rict has revi.ewed the dragt environmental impect
statement, Mid31ome Subdivicion, prepared by Haworth ancl Anderson, Inc.,and
has the following comments:
In the Introduction, page i, paragraph 2 - the stateffient "The praposed package
sewage treatment faeility ~d distribution system was s.pproved by the Spokane
Cvunty Engineers on May 18, 1977, and by the Spokane County HeaS.th District on
Ju3.y y, 1977." is not aecurate. The Health Dfstx°iet approval waz for the
~~subsurface sewage dispasal facilYty" and no other port3on of the vystem.
Page 13, #3 Water -The depths to water table are shown as 70-90 feet. Oux
recorc~ ~how the clepths te be 100 feet dr more Khen groun8 elevations are
~imi1ar to the site ele~~tions.
Page 1$ei, 19 Water - In general, this report implies water added to the ground
at this site rep,ches the a.quifer. Thfs is not a proved hypothesis.
The eemment that nftrates are not genera.lly retained by soil columns may be
philoaophicall,y true; however, therQ is mounting da.ta to show nitrates are
denitrif"ied in s~ila.
Page 21, Public Services - Xou fail to address added burden on the Health Distriet
axid other heglth care. The eommen~z here re].ate to extremes as 5offie of the popu-
latf on may alreaciy be present ,ond receivin~ ~~rvices xn the area.
Page 23 -°1ThL- stwage treatffient system proposed for the project Ys considered the
best avail,~ble and reasonable°~~uatment systeffi This ste.tement should be
reworded. It very we~~ may not be the "best availablet°, while in lfght of
econamies, etg., it rnay be the reasonable system.
Admirnstronon 456-3630 Personal Health 456-3613 Environmenrol Health 4562340
Clinic 456-3640 Vital5rarisncs 456-3670 Laboratory 456-3667
September 8, 1978
Page 2
Fred Dayharsh
Page 30 # ~ - Alternate Development Concepts - Yeu do not inelude different patter)ap,
such as cu1-de-saes, clusters, etc. In thia you state the use af septic tanks
would fnc:rease potenwial for graund water eontamin&Lion. This ~Lr, s,n unproved
statement and does not appew to be a justified statement.
Page 31 - The data vn nit~~~n in ef'f'luent is questionabl.e.
Page 35, #3 -Tl,e comment about effluent qua.lity from stabflization ponds aand
lagoons being marginal must be questfoned and qualified in what respects Yt i~
~~~~ginal".
Page 35, On-Site Waatewater Treatment - Vi4ien di~cussin~ ~~fluent qualfty, speeify
the parameters. Do not make generalizec1 statement~ ~ince tk►ey ffiayr not be true
im this project.
In disctxssing alternatives, you have not included water-use redtriction dcviees.
can have considerabl.e impact. One example: Tn the caee of a 25-acre site
far sewage 3agoons, this acz°eage can be reciucec~ ~~~r 40%.
Page 93, Table - There is an error in addition and subtraction. Total applied
water in year 2024 shou],d read "36. 04" .
Page 94, Chemical Storage, Transport, and Use QThe statement "doe~ ~ot exfst"
is too strong; leaks From stor~~~ tank: and truek accidents could result in fuel
oil sp3lls.
Psge 102, Second Pax~~aph -The drainfield is bYOlogica17 yaetive as the ~ewage
contfntxal7.y adds bacteria andl nutrients f nt~ ~suitable environmento
Very truly ~ours,
ENVIRAWeEN~`~~AL NEALTH DIVYS30N
~D~ ` ~ P I
"
Eciuard M. Pfckett, R. S. , M. P. H. R ECEIVED
Director
SH P 1 ± 11479
om
SP4KANE COUNTY
PlANNING DEPARTMENT
✓
,
,ST~rk
STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE ENERGY OFFICE
a _ z WASHINGTON 400 E Union•lst floor, Olympia, Washington 98504 206/754•1350
J ~
Dixy Lee Ray Lawrence B Bradley, Director
Governor
September 6, 1978
Mr. Fred Dayharsh
Spokane County Planning Dept. ,
N. 811 Jefferson '
Spokane, WA 99201
SUBJECT: Draft EIS for Midilome Subdivision Development '
Dear Mr. Dayharsh :
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the document referenced above.
Our review has been to determine if home builders are being encouraged to
comply with the thermal insulation standards specified in HB 98 from the
last legislative session. The first five mitigative measures listed below
are addressed in HB 98. The other suggestions are also recommended to
increase energy efficiency.
page 123 l. Adequate insulation in ceilings, roofs, exterior walls and
floor sections over unheated spaces.
123 2. Use of special glazing. ~
3. Proper use of vapor barriers. '
4. Use of weatherstripping, caulking or gaskets around windows,
doors and other openings.
5. Adequate i nsul ati on around ducts, pi pi ng and s kyl i ghts .
__123 6. Provisions for well-ventilated attics.
7. Proper bui 1 di ng ori entation and wi se use of 1 andscapi ng to
get the !naximum efficiency from the south and west sides of
buildings.
123 8, Use of storrn doors and wi ndows and use of wi ndoti•rs that can
be opened and closed.
123 9. Use of high performance furnaces that can recover waste
heat from flue gas or those with a flue shutoff.
12310. Use of energy efficient lights, water heaters, air condition2rs
and other appliances.
11. Provisions for bike paths and walking paths.
ZT12. Provisions to implernent carpool ing or vanpool ing or to
encourage use of mass transit.
We have noted which measures were addressed in the draft EIS, and
request consideration be given to the other points as well.
Sincerely,
R EC~~1~t 17 ~
M S. Anderson
~1~ r ~ i41Q, Energy Program Coordinator
MA/jm SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ 3
:
~
~
• • • j AOOOP
S
RE CE'VE
Dseptember 8, 1978
S E P 0 8 1978
h1EMORANDUM SPOKANE COUNTY
T0: Spokd~~"My WAIRIVepartment
FROM: William Dobratz, Assistant County Engineer
SUBJECT: Draft Envi ronmental Statement for
Midilome Subdivision
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the draft E.I.S.
for Midilome Subdivision and submit the following and attached comments for
your consideration.
Page 12. Plat Design Map: No areas are indicated for drainfields.
The map indicates house lots, however, 6.5 or 10 acres of drain-
field is required (based on 6 ank 4 gallon per linear foot, respect-
ively, for drainfield design).
Page 57, Water; Runoff/Absorption: Sections 2 and 3 are both mis-
leading. They are true for the design storm (10 years) but not
true for any size storm other than that, be it a one year or one
hundred year storm.
Page 102. Sludge Disposal: If Spokane County operates and maintains
the treatment system the sludge would not be disposed of at the
City of Spokane Treatment Facilities but would be taken to the
County sludge disposal site.
The attached memorandum include comments on Circulation and Traffic,
and Ground Water impacts.
,
s
y~ ✓
L . .
MEMORANDUPI September 6, 1978
T0: Fred DaYharsh, CountY Plannin9 DePt. R E C E I 1/ E
FROM: Ray Card, '208' Study Program Manager S E P 0 81978
SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Impact Statement, SPOKANE COUNTY
Midilome Subdivision PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I have reviewed the above Environmental Impact Statement in relation to
its authenticity regarding ground water impacts and data accumulation. I find
both to be somewhat outdated and confused. This office has offered Haworth &
Anderson any data we have at our disposal yet the Environmental Impact Statement
only includes data accumulated during the dry season of the year. More specif-
ically, my review comments are a's follows:
Paqe 72, first paraqraph
This entire paragraph needs to be updated. For example: we can verify
recharge and the '208' and USGS data are not conflicting.
Page 77, entire page and tables on pp. 78 and 79
This information only includes (I presume) data from USGS files. There are
other data which illustrates that other constituents are in excess of drinking water
standards.
Page 81, i tem 2
The tabulation in Appendix B does not include all available chemical data.
The '208' field data is not less reliable than other data. Comparisons can
be made by a correlated amount. The correlation coefficient between the results
from 208 and WSU is greater than 0.99 which indicates comparable reliability.
Page 81, item 3
I don't agree with the first sentence.
Paqe 86, third paraqra ph
The author has confused the '208' depth selective sampling with the USGS
sampling program. The USGS attempted only one experiment in depth selective
sampling. This ended in failure. Any other depth selective sampling was done
by the '208' field crew.
Payes 86, fourth paragraph
and top of pa4e 91
This information is erroneous and out of date.
Page 94, Proximity to Water Suppl.y Wells
The author should rewrite this section to reflect more up-to-date thinking
on the flow characteristics of the aquifer.
R E C EI
V E
S EP p g 1978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. 3
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGR[CULTURE
SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE
Room 360, U.S. Courthouse, Spokane, jNashington 99201
August 28, 1978
Spokane County Planning Departrnent
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99201
We have found the soils and the soils map data correct as listed in the
draft environmental impact statement for the proposed development site.
_ On page 45, the topog map shows that the drainage is to the north, _
. towards Plouf (Chester) Creek, which is approximately % mile (1,320 feet)
to an old lake bed which is composed of Narcisse silt loam 0-5o; Phoebe
sandy loam 0-5o; Konner silty clay loam;°and Hardesty silt loam.
All of these soils are bottomland soils that are subject to flooding,
generally in the spring, and it can be expected that if any additional
runoff water comes from the Midilome site that it would merely compound
the flooding problems in this low area.
Additionally, it is our opinion that due to the rapid percolation
ability of the soi1, ground water could be polluted.
If we can be of service to you in dealing with this problem, please
contact our district conservationist, Jud Melton, and our Spokane field
office located at 8123 E. Sprague, Spokane, Washington 99206.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this draft environmental impact
statement.
Sincerely,
qlz~c-' a~LCCr..~LC' J
Galen S. Bridge FC l""I
State Conservationis~
E
R E cEI~
AUG 2 0 ?578
sPOxaNI: coOfIrY
PLANNIrdG OEPARTMEt1T
-2~~ v
61a-le- ,y
,o P-4
Ilk)
STA
S?'ATE OF DEPARTMENT OF GAME
° ~ WASHINGTON
a x
cn i1
Spokane Regional Office
1&89 ~`~y DiXy Lee Ray N. 8702 Division Street
Gouernor
Spokane, Washington 99218
April 13, 1978
Mr. Fred L. Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Department
N. 811 Jefferson Street
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
We are interested in File N. PE-1168-78, MIDI-
LOME FIRST ADDITION: MIDILOME, INC., and ZE-13-78,
AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL.
In which time, the Environmental Impact State-
ment is prepared, I would appreciate a copy of the draft
E.I.S. and if available, a map of the area and loca-
tion.
Sincerely,
THE DEPARTMENT OF GAME
. ~ -
Mike Atwood
Environmental Tech Aide
MA:rb
RE CE IV E
APR 17 i978
SPOKANE COUPdiY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
a~ 3
SPORODO BOLODO peaepol ]POO'D union
W. 1321 Broadway
Spokane, Washington 99201 OUR NEW HOME
Telephone (509) 326-9300 AS OF MAY, 1978 ~
~
- 7t
%
"WRITE" TO THE POINT WITH YOUR MONEY NEEDS
. . \
~ r .
~
, SEPA ENVIROPJMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
i
ADMIPiISTRATIVE EXPENSE AGREEMENT G Z~ 1 I' ~j I
. ,
~'HI S AGREEMENT f
, m a d e a n d e n t e r e d i n t o b y a n d b eEl
e n
e
Spokane County, a municipal corporatlon of the State of Washing-
Lon, having offices for the transaction of business at 1+Jest 1116
Broa3way, Spokane, Washingtan, 99201, hereinafter referred to as
the "County", and _M t-U L ~ - I'AIC - having
offices for the transaction of business at bplo - 3-- ,
6 44...A • - ' 992p , hereinafter
referred to as the "Applicant", jointly, hereinafter referred to
along with the County as the "Parties."
W I T NE ~ S E T H:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy AcL
of 1971 as amended, and the Washington Administrative Code Chapter
197-10, Spokane County has prepared an environmental ordinance; and
YJHEREAS, pursuant to Spokane County Code Section 11.50.860,
when an environmental impact statement is required for a private pro-
posal, the County shall require that the private applicant reimburse
Spokane County for certain administrative costs which are related
to the production of the draft EIS, review of comment responses,
and production of the final EIS, as well as mailing and printing
costs; and
WHEREAS, the applicant hereinabove has agreeci to under-
tak." the pro3uction of an EIS and in conjunction therewith desires
to formalize with Spokane County his obligation to reimburse
Spokane County for certain administratfve costs in conjunction
with the preparation of the draft EIS, comments on the same,, and
production of the finaZ EIS;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
promises set forth hereinafter, the parties hereto do agree as
o~~R
~
fO110W3:
1. The applicant recognizes his responsibility and
legal ooligation to assist the County in the production cf an EIS,
including draft EIS, and comments on the same as set forth within
Spokane County Code Seetion 11.20.423(1)(3)(4) for the following
described project:
hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal."
2. The parties recognize that Spokane County pursuant
to Spokane County Code Section 11.50.860(3) shall recover from
th". applicant all such costs incurred by Spokane County in
administering (1) the production of the draft EIS for the pro-
,
posal, (2) the review comment responses related to the draft EIS
for the proposal and (3) the production of the final EIS for the
proposal, as well as any other expense such as printing and mail-
ing which Spokane County shall perform in conjunction with the
above three administrative functions either as a result of State
• laws, County ordinances or at the request of the applicant.
3. The basis for all charges in paragraph 2 hereinabove
shall be as follows:
(a) Upper level staff time will be billed at the
hourly rate paid by Spokane County to staff inembers providing
such services. In computing the hourly rate, all fringe benefits,
including but not necessarily limited to pension and medical will
be included.
(b) Printing and mailing costs shall be those
costs actually incurred by Spokane County in performing said
printing or mailing including, but not necessarily limited to
cmployees' salaries (computed in the same manner as set forth in
-2-
y •
~
subparagraph (a) hereiriabove) and actual costs of supplies (paper,
stamps, and envelopes).
4. The applicant shall deposit an initial amount of
$.1500.00 with the Spokane County Planning Department
for payment of all'costs as set forth in paragraph 3. The
Spokane County Planning Department after receipting the moneys
will transmit said moneys to the Spokane County Treasurer who
will deposit the moneys in the Spokane County Current Expense
Fund. The Spokane County Planning Department shall maintain a
separate ledger for this proposal termed " ~LQAd
proposal." No County staff inember will participate with the
applicant in the administrative responsibilities of Spokane
County as the lead agency pursuant to Spokane County Code,
Section 11.50.860(3) until the applicant has deposited with the
Spokane County Planning Department said initial deposit amount
or such additional moneys as provided for herein. The County
Planning Department shall voucher against the ledger account
for this proposal all actual costs incurred as provided for here-
in.
Whenever the ledger account set up pursuant to the
terms of this agreement reaches an amount of ,
the applicant agrees to deposit an additional sum of • QO
which-shall be deposited and vouchered against in the same manner
as the initial deposit.
If, after the completion of the functions called for
within Spokane County Code Section 11.50.860(3) by Spokane County,
there still remains within the special ledger account for the
proposal certain unvouchered moneys, Spokane County shall pay
over all remaining moneys to the applicant.
OVG R
-3-
~N WITNESS WHEREOF# the parties hereto haVe caU5ed
~
. this agreement tb be executed on the day af
tl-
1 9'T7.
BOARD OF COuNTY CQN{MISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE C0UNTY, WASFi NGTON
~
f
I .
. ~ {
ATi.EST•
Y L• 4+w O+■ W r ~LIlLAi1D ~
C1elrk of he $oard
~
.
~
Byf
epu y Cler ,
' PPLI NT
.
.
.
~
5
v r4E!
1
9
_ ~
~
~
b L~ lb„v'd Ns L ud ~J L'aY4-_v~>!y c~~'L~1 ~ o
1 P A a ~ k~ "1 ~ ~ f' ~ra " ~ 5~ S~j '1 rn 1"o q ; c ~ r"~ ~ ° ~~a, r v. c~ ~ . , : ~ ♦ " •'a G~~, ~ T ' ,r
~J~ L~.~ 'fa6 I~ ~ W E9 ,'W c3<f..~"~~`~~~~. ~ C+EJ l';1 U f.'~~ W~~r~r~yla..i ~s~~~a, v~Y v;j~~~4, .~u=. ~ l+ly~~a D.►i,Cb l~~
~~a ~~9~I~ ~ ~"r:~,~~~~; C~~~' '~~~~a~ `~~`~~a ~W~:~~c`~~ ~~~i
l4 ~ o b W^in:, < A ~ n c ~ ~ • n. ~ a
a `'c: ac y~'i~-'s a'~' i cr i~ cric cj c~n~'~~`~~~
-7uso,01
~o
~~;~c~~,,;`~,~f~ -Jtb~,~ ~196 ~~(j" •y(*se -~~1„~~~~~ j Sh~~'~~~~~71d ~'~k~~y ~'rb~n~,
~ A ~r 1'• '^a +3
T~~
4 ccf~~'~:~cd~ Lfos
~,~Iv s ~ T ~1Fu ~ i-[pyy r->.la r,~p mq~y
~J ~
i~ ri r~~ ~~~a~~c~~~~,~. ti1 ~ P ~ @(y~7 ¢¢ppn{{~,~ .-a,;~ 4~L1~~ ~ I,~,~~
•~UIJ~ ~ PYLLU~
t
~Gr ~ G t~" 1, " sa n 1' , ~
C'~?~G ~ P~~ C<~~~~.r~..,
~'C~ 6:~l. ~
o , ~ 1:~ U~? a-~'
r-
~l~~c
4~~ 0 ~ ~Se i
1w
L~l~1ft1I,Uf1►~r~ I 1ST JCiforll /ytia/toMt;r
State Oepartiiient of Eculogy, La,,ter•(' 4910"a1 Oftice, Spokiine
State Departinent of Erology, Olym~ia
State Departnient of Natural KesOurccs, Lo~c.al Of fice
State Departaient of Social dnd Health -~ervices, Local Office
Spokane County Health I)75trii.t
Spokane County Ai r Pol 1 ut ion ('ontru lAu thor ity
Spokane County Library f)istrict (3)
•--Central Valley School Oistrict
" Chester Elementary School, Principtll
000'Model Irriqation District
F i re D i s t ri c t tJo. 1
Spokane Coun ty Board of Coiiii►t ss i oriers (3)
~ Spokane County P1 ann Y ng Connni ss i on (7)
Spokane County Park Departrnent
. Spokane County Engineers Office
Spokane County Quilding Department
Spokane County Prasecuting Attorney
Soil Conservation Service, Spokane
Washington Water Power Corijpany
Pac i f i c Northwes t Be 11 Tel eprione Company
Spokane Regional Pl anrii ng Conference
Departiiient of Game, Lacal Office
Spokane County Auditor (3)
Spokane County Planning Department (10)
•--Bob Toril inson, Midilome, Inc.
.o- tJi 11 d Shar e, Attorney
v Joa Honil
Wi 117 am owel 1, Attortiey
v Valley Garbage Service
r
DISTRIQUTIOri LIST FRom No*r/cmsi:T- ~
,-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Seattle
U.S. Soil Coriservation Service, Spokane •
,,11.S. Soil Conservation Service, Conservati•on District, Spokane
..-State Departii►ent of Commerce and Economfic Development
---State Depar-tiiient of Eco1ogy, ~astern Regional Office, Spokane
State Departnient of Ecology, Olympia (2) (1 to the SEPA Register)
rState Ecological Commission
?State Oepartment of Fisheries zkaaoKdk ~4MCQMaa•. (~t,.'oW%•J .
~ State Department of Game, Olympia
~ State Oepartment of Gar7e, Spokane
--,State Department of Transportation, Olympia
&-,State Depa rtment of Trarisportation, Spokane ? S ta t e 0 f f i c e o f F i s c a 1 P1a n a g emen t dow.~e~. C~+•ccQ..a.,►. Qrt'~
..State Department of Social and Nealth Services, Olympia
vState Departrnent of Social and Health Services, Spokane
--PState Utilities and Transportation Corrmission, Olympia
uoState Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation
r5pokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
wSpokane County Board of Commissioners (3)
.~Spokane County Building DeNartment
✓Spokane County Engineer's Office (4)
rSpokane County Library District (3)
Spokane County Park Department
..,Spokane County Planning Commission (7)
vSpokane County Planning Department (20)
&-Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney, Civil Division (2)
---Spokane Regional Planning Conference (2)
Spokane County Nealth District, Environmental Health Oivision (3)
- Spokane Fire District No. 1
~ Pac i f i c Nc►rthwest Qel 1 Tel ephone Company
Washi ngton Water Power Comnany
,,Washington State Energy Office, Olympia
Washi nyton State Departirient of Natural Resources, Col vi l le
v Wash ington State Departinent of Natural Resources, Olympia
,,--Spokane Coirnnuiiity Press
~ Spokesfiian-Review
Spokane Daily Chronicle
wo'Spokane City L i brary (2)
Valley Herald
.--Eastern Washington Health Systems Agency
,
~ ,
. > >
~
~
v
~ ~ .
~
Reference:
OUTLINE OF DRAFT E.I. S.
for
ZD -Z,S~
• . -
~
4 • C.6
(f ncluding pertinent elements of the environment Appendix A)
✓ I. Introduction.
~ II. Table of Contents.
III. Distrfbution List.
~
~ IV. Summary of the Contents of the Draft E.I.S.
L.- V. Impact Summary.
~ A. Description of Proposal.
B o Existf ng Environmental Conditions.
(only in terms of the Elements of the Environment of Appendix A)
~ C. The Impact of the ProQosal on the Environment .
(only in terms of the Elements of the Environment of Appendix A)
l/ D. The Relationshxp Between Local Short-Term Uses of Man's
Envfronment and Matntenance and Enhancement of Long-Term
Productivity.
~ E. Irreversfble or Irretrfevable Commitments of Resources..
~ F. Adverse Environmental Impacts Which May Be Mitigated.
G. Alternattves to the Proposal.
" H. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts.
I. Other Issues.
(optional a s appropriate)
VI. Detafled Categori.cal Analysf s.
(the following elements preceeded by "N/A" need not be addressed, in
accordance with WAC 190-10-444 (1)
A. Elements of the Physfcal Envtronment
1. Earth
2. Air
3. Water
4. Flo ra
ly a
~ r
:
7
,
S . Fauna
6. Noise
7. Light and Glare
8. Land Use
9. Natural Resources
10. Risk of explosion or hazardous emissions
B. Elements of the Urban Environment 1. Population
2. Hou sing 3. Tra nsportation/circulat ion
4. Public services ~
~
5. Energy ,
6. Utilitf e s
7. Human health
8. Aesthetics
9. Recreation ~
10. Archeologfcal/historical
11. Additional populatfon characteristics
12. Economic impact ;
APPENDIX A
As per WAC 197-10-44 (1) the Elements of the Environment are lfsted below
when preceeded by an "N/A" the item need not be addressed in the E.I.S.
(1) ELEMENTS OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT ✓ ~
✓ (a) EA RTH . '
~ f (i) Geolog y. r/ 40 Solls.
I/ (ili) Topography. .
tf /a (lv) UniQue physlcal features.
~
NIA (v) Eroslon.
NV~ (vi) Accretion/avulsion.
✓ (b) AI R '
r (i) Air quality.
~ (ii) Odor.
~
(iji) Climate.
.
(c) WATER.~ '
N~A (i) Surface Water movement a
40 Runoff/absorptlon.
G(iii) Floods.
/A (iv) Surface water quantity.
,
ts%A (v) Surface water quality.
,r6(vi) Ground water movement.
(vIi) Ground water quantityo
(viit) Ground water quality.
(ix) Public water supplies a
~ (d) FLORA o
~ (1) Numbers of dlverslty of species.
(ii) Unlque species,
(ili) Barrlers and/or corridors.
~ (iv) Agricultural crops.
(e) FAUNA :
W Numbers or diversity of species.
~ (ti) Unique species.
Dr (ili) Barrters and/or corcidors o
(iv) Flsh or wlldlife habitato
~ (f) NOISE:"'
NI.A (g) LIGHT AND GLARE.
• .~it,~ (h)
LAND USE.
(i) NATURAL RESOURCES. ~
(1) Rate of use. .
{Ii) Nonrenewable resources.
af
0) RISK OF EXPLOSION OR HAZARDOUS EMISSIONS.
(2) ELEMENTS OF THE HUNLAN ENVIRONMENT.
(a) POPULATION."
i (b) HOUSING.
(c) TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION.
_ (i) Vehlcular transportatton generated.
WA (11) Parkinq facilitles.
. 4= (ui) Transportation systems.
(iv) Movement/circulation of people or goods.
(v) Waterborne, rail and air trafftc.
(vl) Traffic hazards.
n
(d) PUBLIC SERVICES. (i) Flre.
° (Ii) Pollce.
(iii) Schools.
` (iv) Parks or other recreatlonal facilities.
, ✓ (v) Maintenance.
~
. ° ~ (vi) Other governmental services.
~
(e) ENERGY. /
(i) Amount requlred.
v (ii) Sourcejavailability,
(f) UTILITIES. L
(I) Energy.
- ~ (ii) Communications .
(iii) Water.
(iv) Sewero
(v) Storm Water.
(vi) Sol id wa ste o
r/
(g) HUNLkN HEALTH (including mental health).
° (h) AESTHETICS
~
~ e- (i) RECREATION .
v
ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISTORICALo ,
N~r (k) ADDITIONAI, POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS.,
(1) ECONOMIC TMPACT
-
~
~
STATp
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF GAME
° b ~14 WASHINGTON
- 600 North Capitol Way/Olympia, Washington 98504 206/753-5700
~
Dixy Lee Ray ~ ~
Governor ~
C otAA KI OuT,s - FEIs
AT OPA „V;L-Vs R E C E I V E
Se tember 7, 1978 ~
P ~ S E P 13 1978
SPOKANE COUiViY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Fred L. Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Dept.
Plorth 811 Jefferson St.
Spokane, WA 99201
DRAFT EIS: Midilome Subdivision
Dear Mr. Dayharsh,
Your document has been reviewed by our staff as requested. Comr.lents
follow by section.
Flora:- Probable Impact Measures to Mitigate
You state the existing flora will be replaced with domestic lawns
and shrubbery, and in most areas this will result in an enhancement
of the existing situation. In our experience, most wildlife fares
much better in natural vegetation. An explanation of your criteria
of an "enhanced" situation would have been helpful.
Fauna Existing Conditions
We wondered what you meant in saying that the wildlife potential
of the area is "tempered" by the intensity of human development
in the area. As long as food, cover and water are present many
wildlife species will tolerate the presence of humans.
We wondered also how white-tailed jackrabbits were listed among
the mammals. They are foun d only in western Spokane County. Moles
are listed as rodents, but they are insectivores.
Probable Impact
You state the "smaZler game animals may be forced to relocate but
should generally remain in the project area." Habitat destruction
results in the permanent loss of the wildlife that was present,
because surrounding habitat is already at carrying capacity.
The development will probably cause major disruptions of movement
patterns for all of the wildlife formerly present on the site.
~1___> 3
s
r
~
v o
page 2
Fred L. Dayharsh, Director
September 7, 1978
Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
You state "retention of as much natural vegetation as possible will
preserve some habitat for the smaller game animals and birds".
This seems to directly conflict your earlier statement that "the
existing flora will be replaced with domestic lawns, shrubbery,
and foliage". We noted an apparent misunderstanding of what
constututes wildlife, in the continual references to "smaller game
animals". Game animals are those which, under state law may be
hunted during certain seasons. The majority of wildlife species
are not game species, but are equally important to the health and
stability of the environment.
Another impact of this proposal which you might have included is
that of domestic pets. Dogs an d cats are both serious predators
of birds and small mammals. Ground nesting birds are especially
vulnerable to them. The impact of pets and "people pressure" often
extends into areas adjacent to the project site.
In general we felt this impact statement could have described the
proposal's impact on wildlife and wildlife habitat more accurately.
Thank you for the opportunity to review this document.
Sincerely,
THE DEPARTMENT OF G
If~
Douglass Pineo, Applied Ecologist
Environmental Management Division
DP:bj
cc: Agencies
Regional Manager
: m/2 ,`7/'' °
sTArea~
o p, s7'A1'E OF . DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES N_
< WASHINGTON
~ 115 General Administration Budding, Olympia, Washirgton 98504 206/753-6600
1Q89 O1X5/ L.~ Rd5! .
' Governor
August 30, 1978 .
~
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director - SEP
Spokane County Pl anni ng Department, .
North 811 Jefferson ; . SPOKAN _ Spokane, Washington 99201 ~iCAN41N -0
_ PA ff
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
. . _ - .
Draft Environmental Impact Statement- - "
Midilome Subdivision . . .
Spokane County WRIA T-57
We have reviewed the above-described statement and offer the following comment. . . .
A cooperative program involving pen rearing and release of fall ch'inook
salmon into Roosevelt Lake is presently underway. It is presumed that the
number of fish involved will continue at a rather constant level. While
actual distribution of these "resident" fish has not been fully evaluated,
we assume that they will residualize in the lake. -
, Other anadromous foodfish stocks are not found upstream from Chief Joseph
Dam, thus any impacts from the subject proposal to these stocks woul.d be
unlikely. - Fish resources found in local reaches of the Spokane River would be appro-
priately addressed.by the Game Department as well as planned activities
, which might affect this fish habitat.
Thank you for the opportunity to review your statement which appears well'
organiied and clearly presents the proposal.
Sincerely,
,
Gordon Sandis Director
~ .
Js -
cc: DOE .
: WDG
. -91=1 10 3
,%G~,~
~ ATA7p ~
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
WASHINGTON EBst 1031rdiana AvQnue, Spokane. Washington 99207 504l456-2926
Dixy Lee Ray
G°'"e'"Qr September 11, 1978 Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
SUBJECT: Midilome Subdivision Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Gentlemen:
We have reviewed this DEIS with emphasis on that portion dealing with
ground water impact. IJe find this subject covered in depth and have
commented primarily upon interpretation of certain data and current
Spokane County 208 program findings which were not available at the
time this DEIS was written.
Under conditions of Department of Ecology policy adopted March 9, 1978,
and in accordance with FTAC 173-240 to be adopted in November, 1978, as
well as RCW 90.48.110, the DOE must review the sewerage system and
dieposal facilities for approval or disapproval. This review applies
since the disposal facility is a mechanical system serviag in excess
of 10 living units. DOE revieta will be in addition to anp other re-
quired local or state reviews for approval. It will not replace any
other reviews, and actual constructian must conform to the most strin-
gent requirements set forth in approvals from any agency with juris-
diction.
The DOE has reviewed and approved the sqstem for Phase I of the Midi-
lome Subdivision. This approeal is subject to appeal to the Pollution
Conrrol Hearings Board with a hearing currently scheduled for October,
1978.
Subsequent Midilome Subdivision denelopment phases will require further
DOE review for approval.
The order of our review is to first present a Summary of Opinion which
is drawn from our overall knowledge of this project and its relation-
ship to wastewater management over the Spokane Valley - Rathdrum Prai-
rie Aq.uifer. Following this summary are itemized comments dealing
with DEIS comments and conclusions. As is true with the DEIS, most
rationale for review comments is found in the Appendix A section.
Sincerely,
~
LAWRLN~E ~~T N ~°y- _ f .
' Regio ' 20$' Co-ordinato GL n~~
~ YC
EnvironL ua.lity Divisian ~ - -
LNP:cac
f 6 E/1 6
a
Prepared by: Rhys Sterling
Environmental Qualitp Super-
visor
Summary of Opinion
ti 1. It is still the Department's opinion that a centralized sewer system
leading to a waete treatment plant (desigraed to give secondary treat-
ment) and discharging to a subsurface drainfield represents all known,
available and reasonable methods of pollution control. Surface irri-
gation or complete containment of the wastewaters would represent the
highest degree of waste handling. However, the constraints presented
by space requirements and land costs make these options not practical
in manp instances.
~ 2. It is our opinion that discharges from either septic tanks or pack-
age treatment plants will result in very similar impact on the ground
water quality. The most vulnerable zone of ground water impact would
be the top several feet. Generally, water quality will improve with
depth as a result of stratification. Wells cased to greater than
30 teet into the aquifer would draw from such a large volume of water
that drinking water standards should be met from dilutional effects.
Shallow taells extendfng less than 15 feet into the aquifer should be
discouraged no matter tahere the site fs.
6i 3. 1'be Chester area of the aquifer definitely demonstrates a higher
salt concentration than the sa-called main stream. Regardless of
the type of sewage and/or storm water disposal system i.s installed
in this area, ground water quality wi11 be affected. If develop-
ments are continued to be approved in this area, additional impact
on ground water can be expected. Likewise, ground water pollution
from just agricultural activities may also be quite significant.
ldith all of this to cousider and contend with, the Midilome Dev-
elopment is at least taking [he proper first step in the eeentual
mitigatioa of ground water pollution in the installation of a gen-
eral sewerage system. The entire Chester area must be assessed as
a high priority in the eventual sewering of the populated Spokane
Qalley area.
~4. It must also be understood that the significant impact to ground
water quality in the Chester area has already been achieeed -
without Midilome. Midilome, by and Qf itself, iaill not increase
the overall impact on ground water in that area by more than a
moderate amount. It will have an impact but there should not be
a measureable change in existin.g ground water supplies due solely
to this development.
rM2AcT sU-rMARY
£xisting Conditions
3. Water
Page 14 (paragraph l);
Little c+anflict exists over the probability of waste -water disposal
drainfiel.ds as a saurce of aquEifer recharge, however, the qualita.tive
impact of this recharge is nvt yet determ.fned.
Page 14 (paragraph 2):
The source of salt cancentratian increases in the aq,uifer are primari-
ly due tv man`s activities over and along the aquifer recharge zone.
'Y'he current resul.ts of depth selective saztplings grove there is s heavier
coacentration of salts on the surface of the ground water under most cir-
c ums tance s ,
T'he Probable Impact of Proposed ActiQn
3. Water
Page 19 (paragraph 4).
'While the cbemical constitutuents of treated waste water are re+cognized
cont8rninants o€ the ground water, the potential fvr serious bacterio-
logi-cal and virus contanination does exist.
Aceepting that effluent fram the praposed activated slvdge treated effluent
is superior to segtic tank effluent at the time each reaches the drainfield,
there is little evideace to indicate the end pradue.t of either system rea--
ching ground water is high quality. The quantity of percoxate reaching
groux.id water from an activated sludge sewage treatment spstem is anticipa-
ted to be greater than indiv-idual drainfield systems due to less evapo-
transpiration Iass.
Th.ere is a high potential that continued development in this area will re-
sult ifl eventual drinking water standard uiolatians and increased bacteria-
logical threat.
The Relationship Setween Local Short-term Uses of Maa`s Environment and
Mairitenance and EnYi.ancement of Loag Tezm Praductivity
Page 23 (paragraph 2
_F The fact that the treatment system may be supplemented with new teebnalogY
r
ar eventvally hooked up ta a central sewer system does not preclude an
impact on the aquifer. The long term retenti+an of contaminants in the
sail or the sa[urated zvne is a pQtential.
-Pa'ge 26 (Paragtaph..5):
~ -
~ Three measures ,wo.r-.thq of note aie: a), enlarged drainfield aiea:, _b;)
~ ~ - . _
:special d~rainf~ield trea~tmen .t; e:, g_ . , n~itiogen strip:ping grasse6; and
:c) better drainfiel'd ut:iliiation; ,;d_90ing, system.
Al.t_e`rnatives ,:to. Proposod, Proect
3. Al.ternate Develo:pment: :Concep:ts:
Pager 10_;
~ iTh-e conclusion ihat. .use of: =individual,on-s~ite sep~t~ic t~anks -would have-
, _ . : - . _ , -
the effect •of* :inerea'sing= :pote_n.tia:l for ground water- contaminaeion has_
,no,f ,b,een .subs:tantiated and, :is probably incorie,c-t given fewe•r- users in.
~a =16w densit•:y development.
APPENDIX A: Categorical. Zmpac,t Analys:Vs,
Elements of Phy:sical 'Environme_nt
3.. ZJa:ter (begin,. page 56)
3.7 Ground Watei Quantity'
P. iExisting _Condit-ions:
Potential :Recharge from hS'eraage Dispo'sa-1 -Systea Draiafield
:Pa,ge T0 and 72`°:
. The- statemen.t that, "The pr.el_iminary r,esult"si of on ,going "20~8" Water-
Quallity Management program. have not. :p;rovided .any def_ini~tive, con-
clusions; r-egarding _potential recharge_ b.y drainfi_eld eff luents;," should
be updated to - reflect cu"_r_r-,ent, interpretat-ion of the~, final water qual_ity,
d'ata. As recognizeA by -the .writers of this EIS,, the ',pr,eliminary resul.ts
wer:e lias`ed on six- months of diy "w,eatlier sainple col-lecr=ion. .Da-ta, 'fiom
"the wet `weatber sampl'i:ngs period demonstrates 'a. signi~ficant increa9e in
Salts r.eaching; g,:round wa'ter via percolation frdm the im-mediate surface.
A high: degree: of. inf luence. by sep t3c tank ef f luent :is . no t.y.e t sub stan-
-tiated but a:por,tion, of these contaminants orig=in must be attributed on
si,te sewage disp:osal.
Page ~ 72 con,t' d :
~ The- statement : p:ointing out 208, ,preliminary- d'ata .,.demons'tra:tes ttie" mos~t
. .
sigiiificant salt increase occurring, as the aquifer p,asses ~under the
City of -Sp.okane and th~e, lar•ea to fhe. north has Ueen par.tially 'expl~sined' i~n
Cr-os:s-sectional plotting, of -we11.. Aata~ de-
examin'ati~on of the-1~ater data..
monstrates a:degree of =river: (low salt - concentra:t=ion,water'). inflow. to ttie
aquifer to be tiigher than originally anticipa,ted. Tti'e xiver dilutioa of
aqu.ifer -salt -concer►tiations in' the ,~Jest ~Valley and ~East S-pokarie ar-ea
masked the amount of,salt increase&t.tirough ttiis area.. Wlien `the =f-low of
river :an~d aquif,er diverge there is,an unders:taada.ble change iri the, mea-
surable .imp,act ;su_rface act_i•vities ar>e having on wa.ter quality.
Water .Use
b. The =Probable,.'.ImPact:. .of Prop:osed-, Action.
tUTtie baeis foi making the! s.tatenenf that; s_ewage _disposal -from,
this ,site would represenf less t-han, one-tenth of one percen-t
of the, to'tal flow of the aquifer should Ve::qual-ified. Todd'''s
figure of; 41 ,percent of the fotal water •applied`being 'available
for percolation does not~ necessarilq apply- in a straight per-
centage , to;, each of. the componen:ts:!. :Se%,iage ef:f luent being, com-
modly ia j ected~ ;at d'ep ths down to 3,6; :inches would. be; more avail-
able. f,or p.e=colation than precipit`ation -and ir-r:igation moilsture
sources~ which _must pas-s througli the. top' soi:1= area' of greatesf.
evapo=t_ransP~iratian 'iief luence .
3.8 Ground Water Quality
a. Exdsting Conditions
Ph.ysical and Iaorganic Chemscal Characteristics
(1) Contaminate Levels in Excess of Drinking Water Standards
Page 77: This discussion of federal primary and secondarq water quality standards
" violations should be expanded to include recent information. Specifi-
cally, the discovery of bacterial contamination of the Edge Cliff well
a.nd the occurance of cynide concentrations above recommended levels near
the Ka iser Mead Plant should be mentioned.
Page 81:
The speculation that a reported nitrate level in excess of the standard at
site 25/44-26L1 may be in error is diminished somewhat by recent "208" find-
inga. Within the enclave of the Chester portion of the aquifer exists
a band of wate.r with high salt concentration. Seasonal charting of aquifer
water levels together with sample readings indicate this band is displaced
ta the South as water from the rising main aquifer flows iato the area.
Contrarily, as the central portion of the aquifer falls to lower levels and
the Chester fringe area drains, the band moves northward. This phenomena.
could explain inconsistent nitrate readings during different aquifer eleva-
tion stituations.
(2) Historical tJater Quality Trenda
Page 81 cont'd:
, The "208 " study reported "field data" is termed less reliable because it is
generally the result of less accurate and reliable analytical methods. This
presumption is not correct. Although field readings were found to be about
25% higher than laboratory reaults in testing for nitrates, a correlation
coefficient of 0.98 caas determined and the "208" field results exceeded the
performance expec ted according to the EPA publication dealing with this
subject. Likewise, the chloride results which taere roughly 10% higher in
field testing than laboratory results were judged of adequate accuracy.
, Recent work done by tbe "208" program indicates that there is indeed a trend
` of changing water quality within this area. The historical increase in
salts parallels pop ulation growth. The lack of reliabilitq of older sam-
ples is recognfzed by "208" planners, however, it is thought that the large
number of samples lend sufficient reliability to the plot showing this up-
ward trend to conclude that change has taken place.
(3) Water Quality Variations jJithin the Aquifer
Page 82 and 86:
, The source of salt concentration increases are currently better under-
" stood than at the time of the 11208" Preliminary Water Quality Report.
The cross-sectional approach to determining the river influence demon-
strates a clear picture of the increases. Furthermore, the wet weather
sampling de.monstrates stratiFication takes place in all but three of the
"208" depth selective wells. These exceptions are thought to be under-
stood without diminishing the validity of statistically confirmed strati-
f ication in the majority of wells.
S torm Wa ter Drai.na&e
Page 92 and 94:
The impression might be given that dissolved inorganic materials consti-
tute the only potential for ground water contaminatioa from storm water
drainage. The petroleum and pesticides mentioned earlier are a concern
that must be considered. Also, it is important to note that the dry well
approach to storm water disposal provides a conveyance mechanism for acci-
dental spillage of any materials to reach ground water.
c. Measures to Asitigate Adverse Inpacts
Page 94 an.d 96:
The conclusion that low density developments would be substantially more
° expensive to sewer if a central sewage treatment facility is established
should recognize that there are significant problems in hooking up a sys-
tem that was installed in the absence of a master plan dealing with pipe
dep th, size and flaw direction.
The conclusion that monitoring wells would mitigate or prevent contamina-
tion of drinking water supply wells should consider the fact that it would
be difficult if not impossible to remove the contaminate source with a
short-time notice. Also, the amount of contaminates that can be stored in
the soil for annual percolation to ground water is unknown. A placement
of monitoring we11s will always be suspect in the review of data, also.
3.9 Public Water Supplies
b. The Probable Impact of Proposed Action
Ef fluent QualitY
Fage 99:
The emphasis 3n the comparison between eff luent Quality of an activated
sludge system iaith septic tanks is to point out the area where the former
is superior if constructed and operated correctlq. There is a potential
for septic tanks to contribute less total nitrogen to the ground water,
and that should be recognized.
~
Page 102:
The discussion of bacteria and virus concludes that penetration of these
elements to the water table is ualikely because of depth to water and low
moisture content of the soil. This appears to be a hasty conclusion given
the questions that this draft EIS has presented about the moisture stress
being due to the summer month test period. Furthermore, it has been esta-
blished in one controlled test in California tbat bacteria traveled 232
feet through soil. [Jhen properly designed, drainfield systems can dis-
perse the wastewater to the extent that the soil is an effective treat-
ment mechanism.
The use of tertiary treatment to define treatment taking place in soil bio-
systems, is, misleading. The unknowns involved ia this system preclude
the ability to define the end product at any given time or under different
loading rates.
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
Page 103:
The statement is made that "Nitrates are the pollutant of greatest concern
fYOm the disposal of waste water effluent in sub-surface drainfields lo-
cated over the aquifer." The following quote from the Stmmiars► and Conclu-
sions of the Idaho Panhandle Health District Rta. 1, Ground Water Quality
Monitoring Technical Report; is another view worth noeing:
Nitrates have traditionally been the first component of sewage to
m.anifest itaelf in ground-water. This is due to the fact that they
are highly stable and extremely mobile since they dissolve easily
in water. IIigh nitrate levels are not only a public health hazard,
but are also considered harbingers of other contaminates from the
same source that are less stable, less mobile and require a longer
period of transport.
cop y
R .
AUqUst 1, 1978
Or. Jim Frank, Associate Haviorth and Andersm, Inc.
tlest 621 Ma1 lon Avenue
Spokane, 6tA. 99201
°
Attached p't$ase find the rough draft of the Draft Environmntal Impact Statement
, fox 111fidi'Ionge Subdivfsio'n. I have reviE4ied the DEIS, Favticularly for fnrm and Eott- _ •
tent, and geiieraliy, for factual irifot^mation. The €ollctwing are a.mas of the DEIS
In which reu#sipns or add_it4ons should be made. 1. Disfiribtstifln Zist. The prop4sed cireu'I 4tion list for the QEIS apMrs tb,be inccmptete. 4bviously, the faur area newspapers
(The Chronicle* 1`iie Re+view~ *ThP_ Cd~unityy Press and the Valley
tlerald) arrd t~a Spoica.ne C#ty Library are nat listed. Addition-
. ai ly', certiain Feder-al ag'encies (such as the Envf rarorlenta'l Pr-o-
tection Agency ) and S~te agericies (swcii as the t~01ogica1
'Cflim3Ssion, t6te Uti1ities and 'transportatlon Comiisslon, 4n~
thte Depattment caf Cvsmerce and Economic QeVelops~L-nt) haue 'been
left off the dis~tribution yist. I wnule# sugge~~ that the lis,t.. . ing be expanded to i ncl ude thase mentioned above, as weTI as
4the~` po~clt~el~y fnt~r+~tS~d pdt"~:~~es. Ti1g attaclted 1ist' ft*om
ttte tlortficrest -pF2S, w~oul-d appear to be a more Eon-p3o-te diStri -
bution 1istingi and shoul d 6e incorpotated withthe -raugh draft
liSting fQl" MidiloI11P. DEYSr °
Z. Essoin-iia1 ~~o iES 1acking or not_ addressed in the TO. ;flthin
~~e text, twe foTlowing tqpics have'*7~'Sen left out or -lVAeV:
1) CI imate, 2) other governmntal sert9ces, 3) Cor=win9 catf ons
and Archeological IHtstorical. 'These items should te head-
lined «ithin the text and addressed, If the di-scussion is con--
tained vJlthin apothet* section, thenV that appropriate reference
shoul d be made uider the appropr1 ate topf c.
Under the heading u~lements of ~~~e Ruimn EnvironmW the three
subi~~~ding5 0f nHurnan l1palth n 1' Mesthetics , " and "R4creatioh"
have al l been listad as non-4pp1 qcable. These ateas must be .
addtressed. At a mirdmun,,these subJQrts must b+e discussed in
re'tati6nshi~a to-the sewage t1reatr~ent plant and its aperation,
. safe~,v, fu-ture-site use, and `appearance/aasfihetiz qual ity.
V ,
) ~ .
E C EJ V E ~
se~. 8. 19*,.
S.EP p 8 197a.
Mr, Fred DayharsYi; Director S P'O'KA N E C 0 U N T Y '
3 p o k an e C a u nt y Planni ng DB. pt. , P l: A N NING DE-PARTN9'EWT
N'. 811 Jefferson . • -
.
Spokane, WA, 99201
- SUBJPCT - DRAFT SIS ON"MIDI-LCKE SUBDIVISION .
1', Since,xei're dealing.: aith an EIS for an "after-the-fact" project, comparisons are
espsoially -hasd. ta comput.e. I bave arrived:=at Just such valid c~npe~sons by ueing
both ma.xi.mtm .and Average- eewage floir data givea me by the -Spolane County, Health:'Diata
maximum. gallons :ger day frbm athree bedroam are :said to be •900, If the: 52 haaes . '
presently on the existing plant(~vith 7400 -liaear feet af drainfield`) aere on .individual se;ptic ts~nkis they aould require 9360 linear feet of drainffeld o The
lcading ratea, are therefore 5gallons p8r'linear foot . foac ae p t ic . t ank s -an d 6-, 3- _
gallons per li8ear-Yoot Yor the ° paclage plant, .Using the eame 52 hames -f or'-conpariscn,
and 'baeing the design on a~ ~f1o,~s: af-350•gallons. pei day per hataeo- you aauld
have a lc~ad~ing: -rate. af, ,i,qe='I~neaar foot with septic tariks a~ .20~6 ~allo~ -per
-linear fvot. ~ith ttie .package planto To hancile aEaximuaa flaws_ f.ar the= eame 52 homes
:it'.wauld require, a 900 gpd .A-'52 honee cr 460800 gpd re,tentivn, capacityo- .
The completed poroject of 425 tiamea o"in crdei to =pcrovide the 9-quivalent capacity and
drainfield,laadift. rate af. iridlyidual septic tankB, »ould require a plari~ . with a
.capacity to handle- 382..500 gallons per day. and 7bo500 linear feet. af- drainfield,
Propcaals we °ve -heard :are sub8tanti,ally _ less and must,be based -npon average , flows
rather than gossible maxd.manas, -Is ;thie a valid conclusioa? .
2e Wtiy' are agenciea allowing.a. aubstantially smaller- syetem -Mith -a..tiighei laading
rate fr.am a plarit'that wfll be putting out '-large quantities of zitrates• -and other.
,cheinicals witki ° a high volunie of mater as a carrier? Won°t .~suoh a diactaacge,
sustaiaed over-lcmger parials of time than septic tankso cawae l~ydraulic aver~
loading of, soil Mater `holding° capacity? - _ '
3, Please. do . a valid comparia on of the laad area,required f cr diainf ields.-f br 425-
_ individnal septic taeksancl_ the area.to.be aavered. by the, -f u l ly aomp le t e d pac k a ge~
Plant p~roPosed? - ° ,
40 Why 'is there ao site ~map shoai'rg° -preeent seo►age facility oonetruction and -
.another- gh6ing the.territary covered.. by -4;he fully camplete,d systea: fvr the 425 -
hoines?: . . . ' -
5, -There has,been na-mentiion of pcropased landecaping; for:the drainfield area ar"
uho Nould do H&0 oa * graundso -Is any~thirg ~planned er will it reaiafii-, covecred xitb - I
.weeda? . , .
Ei, Kaaes.are already in4 ooith no buffer area, Isnft, any projected ar -cio you gntend
t'o bufld right up -to the plant? Most -experts consider 500., feet _a. bare.minimnm for
syateme of'this tygo, Neighhoars aie, alresd~r aaanplaining aborit thg_ noise Praan the pumps in ,the existing .
_y decibel readirgs? Maes 'all 8ewage have-to be
planto Hor aften do they ritn? An
lifted to the,plant? Is preaent paaier coneumptt-on being taetered?'Ie volume passing
through the plant beiAg metered? Is any t,esting req,uired at present?
i`
.pg.o 2 . . . .
Whwt are the teet results frqan the "208" stud3r, di the ..Gez1iaonte we11. juet south
of, the plat.?
99 iiill the ffiost recent "208" . data on. the Cheater area epecifically be inclucled in '
the P inal 'EI3T
.10, .Coritrary to comment on page 16, the .f4rat phase of the plat is, already- being
served, by Model Irrigatlon; Naen•t -this entire.: 160 acreB been. anreeRedby Model? -
With thwtremertdvu8. impact, of •an" additianal 1400 peo.ple aho is 'going to pay fat
aJaew we119 transmiasion linee :and -a netr- holding tan1k for an already overtaxed.
System? o . • li,a yWhy 1no mention of the fact that Mvdel I_rrigation tiad to -ehuL dawn one of itisi
xells dne to contimna,l colifosm bacter9.a coritaminatioa? 'That same; w,ell -i8 may.be
vne tialfmlle narthwest di the Midilame plat in, ttie general direction of floar of
the aquifer-,, - '
-120 . Does vwner .get to xr-ite* off -pl,~nt depoceciatiaa and9 If so, io~t" does, it atnouat 't'o?
Such it'ems .shauld be considered in t'a valid coat aadpaaci8on df ',aeptic tanks 'and the
package "planto . . 130' Wott°t anioAe admit there°s a seasonal.: poniliag -paroblem ia the ~southwest carner _
af thie plato near the "treatsnent plant, The 'whole neigtiboancood ice skatros there , every, xintere . ° 14. Vith '30% orP the--~glat. becaming f.mpervious 'dne to buildi.tg and,_pavi.ngo xtiat. aie
eatimtes ~ oif incl^eaee8 runoff f7com 160 acres with 'even, a hilf ~ inch , rainfall or
saow melt? -Von°t 'Aryxella aotually~ becosne i0ection wellB to the aquifer? _159. Yeur eoiiparisons aie nat eoniafs"tent -ae ~you soametimea uee galloaB and cubic feet
vf.__water interchangeablyo Al-l_ oaaapaifiiom of conditiona must 'be. localiked as xe.
are in a general.-area aP: rec4rgeo flood haza~rdasclhigh nitrate readingBo We _
are glso in the rnaacgiml area ct the- designated sole, source aquifer that: ge'ts- less
taixing and theref ore- a great.er 'buildup qf contaminants,. -Please dan°t aampiare flbws
in thfs aicea to total flow of the aquifer ae -youaae -done: on pete 190 -
16; Haia the drafnfield designed far the' paoicage- p]raat- allo++ed fdr restfng of, eecti-ons. :
to prevent averla&ding? :If soo Mhat w-ill the `laa;ding rate. be on areas in use Khen
othere are b"hut d,ovrn? If notp aouldn°t euch, a- design pacovide a.longer .c}z~ainfield 1'ife. cr'.do you feei the preeent system can take the sustained use, it will 'get? Have you only a1_low.ed one drairifgeld replaaernent area? A package plant Just. across
Bawdish. ficm>~iidi.lo~e (Aloa 3ubdiviSi~o n) had to,replace -ite -entire: drainfield 'in
about ons year ancl ac~ has.no additic~al .s.paae available~ if the~ secon,d one ~faila
as~ ttie lota t~ave all 'been aebeiop.qao-
47, Is an,qoae considering the cvmulative impact af the high_ deiisity development in
' this lqmited area or is each proposal ~ looked at inAsolation?
'18,; What is the altsrnate: plany if we rapidly, reach the_ EPA cutacPf of, 6ppon A'itrate
in avr local- xells? :Give us- saae valid cost est9mtes fooe= denitrificatloA af both
sewage and drinking -water? Is -it. technically _ feas~ible? Who xanld p~,y?
Y '
I
• l~~
• ' ' ' ° '
Pgo 3. .
19e Thsre was ; no afention af ths 3lnapsan'Sragineera: oa-egte, peYCOlation testa for
Midilameo Rather than =rapid geimeability they found law io mvd'dmte
penetra~ion ' af ' the Sprfhgftle aoils, This 'points aut. quite clearly the eevere , sea$anal. -variatioas
in aur sails capabilit9.ea .ani-should."be publiahed verbatfm in your final draYt.
Is the, plarft design• based on the.on-site tests aar the usual vague, general
guidelines? Alsoo "ttieare .fts .no meritioa of the UoS`; Soil Coaservation Service book].et
on Engineerirg Limitations fcr SpokEine-Caujity'SoilS.whioh warns that Springdaleand
Garrf96n, sails have a pa~ential far, groBAd ~rater cont~au~inatlon, ~ °
20a Based, npon ;3impsoa perc tests cauldn•L we . pateatially hav.e- sewage= eurfacing
dur-ing bigh -saturation periods of the , year-? 2-1-9 -Isn't it tirue the local :Healtb Diatrict -approves paoksge planta ia "hi,gh .density"
developmerts f-,aac unspeciPied "econaanic" ieaeons, ,not :~ecause of any superiwity in
treatment qr envir,cmmental. pwoteetlon? d1hat "is. primazy tunder. 3EPA?. .22, Who deteftines.ahat fs the "'best• available and reaeonable" method ot treatment
faac- a given locale anal ho+e . is euch a 8etermination rmade?
23, Septic tanke Rith dry. 19.nes (collection . sysl,ea)' is one alternative not: =mentionedo
Why? .
24o Since aui 3pokane County Health regulations allew paving cnrer drainfields, how ~
da we know this one will be,pr,otected fram vehicular traffic aw building? D3HS
,-regulations 'say .no impervlouB -8urface,over a drainfieldlo
25o D31LS Publieatioa #?'l~i -"On-Site, Sexage 'fliBgosa-1 Prvgram" (May 197-7) has an
interesting camparison of aeiated aystems and eeptiic ',taiks weigtit,ed- heavily in
favcac cf eeptic taaks. Ie the EIS author.awaie of this tcciparisan and mhat.are yrnar,
aamaenta: in resporiee -to 'it? , 260 '96mentiofl in. ttae ETS of the earlier Crosby stndy-4one -:fwc the Yalley utilities
which fourzd AB8 fcem detergents,-at .90 feet ia the xaeter tiablso Thia testing was
about one mile from this plat in ttie :sauae .SxE eailsand under the Boxdish Juniar.
'.High drainfield in late aummer when. l.t had not been `ia use fcr several months,
17, Yau state on -page, 77, "F'-ive- 0 'the si-tee wtiiire driadng iiiter s Undards have-
been exceeded .are.. loca"t.sd in the g4pneral viciuitY af, the Prbposed :pioJeot eite, o,"v Can We•~afford'to. opesiate with so man'y unkaowns iri suoh an-area? .
28, Since yvu qupstion t.he validity af eome.,af, the "208" field t.est4egdo you allow
theta an oppaortunit-y for rebuttal? ,
29, Contrazy to youc ooiWents that long tez~a trends,are Qot apparent s recent ~
s4atement i, n* the paper `by Larry Fisvelt -say,e they a3ceo -He ahaul8 be contaoted for
the most.. receAt arialysi~ .af 0208" data aAd the tgencls that ha.ve become visibleo ~30; Ths table on pege 82 does nvt iaelnde County Health aell dat,a giveri'to the Cvunty
Comissioners on. xells tested near Midilcme, 3ome tested at aver 4ppm.. nitrate and
oae -uell mas only A5 feet deep, This data is- all: la the publio. -reaarda 310 We vant eolifoarm bacteria -data includ"ed _on page 91 -particularly because of the
closure -of t~-Aodel wello
. ~
' - .
4, . .
, 32. The vnly effluent-:mentioned in- the clart on .page.93 ia fram. Beptic tanks'o What
about numeraus attier sgetems and their contribut.ians? I8 it that we really don°t
knaw. han much p~ckage plants axrd cesspools are dischargi.ag-because Ne hade no data .
and, require no` t.esting- er- ffionitorieg? -
33. DOeB ~.~encY even knau hcai mucb ,effl:ueat segstic ir,ankf ce8spool pu~apers diapocse,
' ct e aet~ year?_ 34; Althcugh the general squifer flaw is -shawn , to to nowthweetg couldn°t It also
be flowing sauth tomard, P'leouf Creek drainage? ;
35e You mention 'teeting that cculd be done as an esily warning system of iacr~a,sing
pailutants, ldhy can°t atioh teating. be eaamdatccry ia.thie environjaeatally, eensitfve
area? We lave heetrd that dedelopars rettuse to a11ow the U3GS to do tau,y teatiag ia
higb volume discharge :areas, The tigligst density they cduld, find were same 8uiglexes
whichg of caursed can°t compare to :thgse gigan4io 'Installatioa8,
36'. Is ;Spohane -County godig* to aontinue to aacept sucb larrge developmente- xitb admitted :un~o~n adveree impaet.s? ae havis already allcwed developMent 6o. dease
e►ver' our aquifer that if the llalley incerpvra4.ed. it would be 0,64th or 5th largest.
city in t.hs entire state, .
3?. We. , 3ust learned,oanather package *plant hasa magicAlly appearesl avernsght'=1n the
Paintedl Hills :Subdgvieion ivit,haut the.kno+rled& as. approval af reeponsible regulatary
agenciee at botix local aud. state levelso eoastraoti`on tas agaia preceded approval anri- they °re ta3king abaut requiring anather EIS afterdtheofact and the housee are ocenpiedo. This one°s fa a natural dra9:nage 134sin- for surroundfxg• hflls and 03troam
fr,cm' a public well e 389 ,Why did the Midflame developsr allow hoaaes to be. eold aad occupie8 prior to final .
aaeeptance of the eyetem Iq the Caomly Engitteer°s ia violation of their September-
29o ig?? aon4.ract? Omner stated th~ hames waula nat -be occupAed uptil Enginee=°s
uere doing, K&0, To date '-the 8ye.trem ~ still has . not received, final approval; ar .
acceptance _and! is,preeently befng operated by an nncertified operator in violation, ,
af DCEOB WAGAs, The operatar~:.*e°ve been tolda is -the same peraon wtio installed
, the pacesent,system Eaithaut. the required Installer°e -Parraft,
39. Please, print a copy af the Septeffiber 299 i97'j cantract between Midilvme.aad the
Ccunt~ Rngineer°.s ,so athers m'ay read the terms t►hemselYeea We fee1= an. additional 66
homes oa the euisting systean is,a 4drgone coaclnsfoa-as-that ie aonaidered -the
Ureak eveapaint bqyoad.whiah the.developer cannot be held responsible f.or deficita.
Uatil a total ot' 118 uaite are on, the eystemq-the omber ie liable f"ar a possible
, t
appears 9.mp~sible ~o-
$,"00 p~ year, nespit.e ~ws such ee ~s~A ana RCw 90,48 i
stop .sucb blatant development xhen rea]._ est:ate intereet,s 'have made anp monetaiy °
commitmento In this iaetaace 've'bave heard tlzi.s 8eveloper9s attagneys prlead; that ,
their-client badalready imested . over $1000 000 and, peopl.e ,were ,mori.ng into homes
where,they,might'not be able_ 'to flueh their tailets e .
40, You etate ea page 99 that 'the paclage pl,ant is more effeetive -in remcn►ing
colifoarm bact,eria but your 'chai~t oa page 100 oal,q g4vee cblarinateal ePfluerit data.
Ahat wanld the uncbloar9.nated oount be? Cempared ta 8eptic taA effltaent?,
41, ffmuldn't: a chlvacinated diecharge t:o a aubswrf'aae. draimfield, .also kill the ' bacterira you need fdradditicnal t.reatment? Haven°t t.hey disaantinued use of the
Aloha chlcrfiataar~ fcr' that very reaeon?
I , -
• ~ -
I .
. ft: 5
.
~ 42Isn°t septic tank effl-ueet with -»itragen in the, faarrm a"f ammoatuan .scteial]:y pref'orable 'to the nit.rate ccaning,_f`rom an aerated -system? What~e ths Health_ Dietirict°s
position on tliis? . ,
43, Do.es the authoor xecognig•e the val4dity cf~tlts following' direct ~quot.e, Yraan_
the 1964 $avelt=Saxton r.epos't cammiesioned_ by the, City cf , Sgekane .to report- on
'the caritamiaation ofsame lowl wellb-"The .vertfcal distance -fram evntaminatih&
paint to the mater table ha►B no great ai;gniftcauce fn the 'caee af chamical cvntaminarits, especially -when l,arge quantitiee oi' fl4shiug water 'are' Irrirolved".? Qne, af the Kells in the, report was contam~ted by ohlorides -even thaugh the Vator
' table- in.4.ha►t-area fs 130 feet beaeatti "the aurface and:p to this dayo (eome 23 year's
lat,er) it -is Btill too high iu-cb].aride to he used,
4wo The final p~a~ragzalah on page 102 . sboul8 be eaough, to declare amcmatorinm om
future phases aud to require inBtallation of segtic tanis foac those alrea+dy in t,he
52 -haaesa. 'Develoger izas alrftdy, ata4.ed he amad pay .fcr eept4o' teu~keif they were -
~ determi.ned`, safei and requirsd,. - -
45. Hcrur .aften. uill elndge have to_ be pinnped "fraea this plant? Mhat valtunes par y.ear? -
46e Ie the City aga4n allaMiag Connty pu'apers to dnmP s1adgia in their- syet,em? The
laet J heerd ~theyvere noto
-479 ~On, pago 103 yon se,y_ denitacfficatian,of the plant is not :fea$ible eaonaenicallye
Give u;a same. econmi.c clata~ on 'xhat its oostiag ather :areaa in attempting to inak&
water drinkible? . .
48, Theie is no- appropriate :sit.e faac a diaiefield- in the plato The aqnifer; ie only
60 Peet beaeath the aurface and soils are exceseively permeable in thle -eummer and
eatwrated in 'the aintero -
49.9 What is it,pftsedtly costing. "to operatre the one-ttiird af the plaat that °s already
in? How,many hours per day f ar*KdiO?; -Ai^e there aqy meters ta!measure flaw through
_ plant?: Energy oonsumption,, meaeuredY Costs? .
5po On page U2 you.say an K8c0 agreement *ill be executed tiutAt already has, ,
.510. 'Me ctiart on page 162 ehould have -speaific_ cocipa=leoa, aata 'on specific alteraatives
'proppsed foor thie sitwa Chart ccmparisone ar.e uaelese aa they appaar to be Keighing_
individual septic tanke and iadieidual aerobcic units nat septic taftks and-A l,arge
consalidated -pacl;age treatment planto Wly- is there- no local comparisad at todsyas
costs? .
52. I recagnizs that eeenomfc eoniaiderations -are impartaAt but I still- Peel that
uncler bdth 9FPA,and-_RCV` 90,48~~a10 ~.pW~ection af emriraa~meat aad -the xatere og 'the
etate take-, precedence, Carrect? Ands -after°all theee resffis af paper ntede xe
dtfll. tzaVe ao ,subatarrxtialo valid ecoriomic eqmpMrieon aat1a,
53o If , DCE', Ana Dsxs (vEige 162-) 'trouia -not allaW the Kidilctae dischairge, to a surfaoe,
i►atero why ahauld it be all'awed- into a sole source aquifer?
54a Don°t .etat:ements on page. 162 in paingzaph under Table. 2 conflict xith, ccmpariaoa
-,aat;a . fn chart on page 311?
n~
. . Pgo 6 -
~50- Youz ma,~acr advanta~es =1leted on p~e. 1~4 are queBtionabl.e si$ce ~ae really have
no d4ta in 3pokaae County -cf, effiaiency of exiating syst,effis, einae DCE reftises to
~ caanply witb RCW - 90.4$.1b0 :anr3 162 "d, Pnit sueh -systems on Waste Diecha=ge Permitso
'
Will the oxner of Midilame aP °_~FlY,to DCE Po= sucla a Permit as~i'uire8?
~1
56; I am attaching,. four exhibfts xith theee ,.comaentso Z'wo are pnpars I p~epared
-fc►r a.warkehap in 1973 and the- oth+er' two were presented to the, Connty Commissiouera
at- a 3epto. 8, 1917hear4.ng on 'Kidilarkeo
570 • I am requesting iiit~cae=tiqn on -permits-required f or -exteaeions cf thfs ayst,em
and approral of' plans o Alsoe ~ahat appals , are avaflable and how,.many days to
file? :31see I feel.. -the EI3 is totall,y inad,equate to date, are any adminietrative
appeale .ava►ilable after -the Pitsal EIS? If,aot,. abat is procedure 'far lltigation
an8 time pei-iad- far :filing? -
-56, Fina1 ' 7KOU].d 11I~e to qudte :,a section af,the SEPA Guidelines i~AC '197-14-360 (3)
~ It shanld~ remembered t~aat ' p~rap~als designed to inproNe the enviroa~aent ("eucti
as sewage treatweat p1ants, or pollution ;cQntarol. requ9.rementa) =may also, have adverse
erviromaent.al impactso The qnestion at the-t.hreshold determi.mtion lenel is -nat whether
-the beneficisil.: aspe.cts- of a proposal outeeeigh its adderse-' inipactso but- rat.her if the
proposal involves a:~y significarit adverae iapaats tp"on the qna►l#y, of fthe erieiroiamente
If it' doieso. an- PI3, is --requiredo No teat o~ balance , shal.,l be, applied at tihe threshold
:deteztainatian level;." This HI3 ebanld°ve 1een done parior- to„any development and it'~B
apparent there are Btill -nwnerous unanewered_ queBtionBa
Jban 'Horiican ~S e- j9Qli BOwd9:eh Rde
Spe~ka'ea o ~ 99206
WA
EXCE3P'TS FROM "U33a:i PIAUNI1~G ASPEeTS Oy '~lA MH POLLUTIOY CO~iTROL"
, ~
. . BY szcuRD cfLkva 1969 ~ 3 V a~~~
PACKAG2 TR:4T~tE_~tT PL.4~VT5 ~ F
• 1. Bevelored and marketed in the 1950's. ~
2. Usually overdesigned and require heavy power consumption.
3. Can't comgare in en'ir_ei-ring eY"ficiency xith standa=-d pl.ants under continuous
control.
4. A 50 house development (or even 25, if homes are exFensive) is large er.ough
to support economically a Fackage trsatment pla.nt.
5. CapaCities and types mtist be selected car2fully, require regulas inspection
and -na.intenance, nust be screaned an3 fenced.
6. The plants z e vulnsr3hle to shock loa3ings ( sharg increase in flow volumes )
xhich nay causa a large qua::tity dischargz of solids in the effluent, Mechanica3 *
failures can have the same result.
7. Possi'ole safety preca.utions aaainst pL3nt upsets are : final sand f iltra.ti on ,
duplication of vizal equipment and bufi er strips of 500 feet.
8. SomA salvage valua where septic tanks are a to'-~,al loss.
9. Don't demand a large municipal excerditure when rsvenue base has not devAloped.
i0. A grecisg raster vlan is indisper.sahle in order to consolidate all p.c;age plan},s
into a sir.ole system in the future.
EKCERM r^RCM "SMALL SE'riAGE TREATI~►,TT SYSTLMS "
BY NaTIONAL ASSCCIATION OF HCME BUILDEPIRS a SEARCH INSTI'£Ul'E
1. To be acceptalsle to FHA and VA a community system must cempZy wsth all state and
local la.ws and regulations and be approved by the health authorities. Permanant
maintenance and continuous use and oreration must also be assured.
2. Of the 12 stats health dspts, visited, in the study, all were of the opinion th3t
the operation and maintenance of corn.mur.ilty seKezaga systsms are mor9 satisfactor3,
whan under the contro2 of s cme governmental agency. This kind of gavernmenta.l
organization is mandatory in 7 of the 1:2 states visited.
3. The cost of septic tanic systems varies from about $150 to $700 per house.
4. T-iost domsstic seWage stabilization ponds (lagoons) in the U.S. a7-e desigaed on
the bzsis of 30 to 60 houses psr acre of pand surface area.
5. Develo°oers should re#.ain a consulting sani tar,tir enginearin~ firi to supply the
technical advica necessary for the projsct design. tlajor problems that uil~
confront the et~,;ineer include relatina the possihle groxth rata of the pro ject
or the rate at which the homes xill be sold to the design o° the sexerage facili4ies
so that it will function satisfactorily and econ m ically at ea.ch staoe of the
subdivision development.
6. The FHA has its own form of trust deed whare the s,,rstem is to be o•,,rnsd tyy a private
corporation -Ifor profit. It also has sppcial pravisions for the cnar-Itter of a aoperty
axners' as3ociation.
DOUBL STAIYDARD I:v PBOPO522D SPO'Al"24, CGJNTY WaS'F~,'~iATER DISPOSAL POLTCY (T'r[IS 'dA5
R.^J :CTEED BY T'ciE BOARD AND PRESEIVT REGS. WERE ADOP`IED)
PUBLIC SE'rlEERAGE SYa VitS SINGL•E OW?24R SEWERaG ; SY-SVE►1S
1.Prelininary plans must be done by a 1. Preliminary pl3ns may be done un3er suger-
licsnsed enaineer. vision of an en~qineer.
2. Raquire a public m€co entity. 2. An individual or corpora.tion may mPco.
3. 1Yo multiple hookups allowed. 3. Sama nail.tipl.e hoo3kups al].owed. -
4. No wet wells* for pmmping s tations. 4. rI3y use xat wells* ior psmping stations.
5, 411 prelin. pl.ans go to s•tate 5. Sone prel3.n. pla;:s go to state a;en.ies
agancies for approval. for appraval.
6. Sh31I make tests and kesp records 5. No r.ention of testirg or recor3-kaeping.
nscessazy for propier operation.
Require e3sements or right-of way ilo eassment or right-of-w?y required for
for collectors and latpralsf collectozs and late-rals. ,
~ In ast xells, pijmps are suhmsrged in seaaae presenting healtn and maintenance
problens for those rzsponsible for rep3irs.
_ ~
. ' 1
73"
. . -Z
T:lriniIA-L 1I37" Gr -11PU?SM"iG I'LaNTS r%1?A LAG.OONS :ili;i DR31-0711-E.ND~ OR 0?ER:~il'C`1:a~~ PRC3~i~iS:
•
YiTP.0' ';'~~G~:~ :C~0U~7Y _H' i~'7
T~T
: s _J.L~ST
d' e
`Vallpy.Gen?ra? Inaclequa.ie apsi~ -ppOT OaGraLiOnd .
Vz3:u-i•Iar- t - T-66 ssrall :.ahd6oiie ~oor or `tion, f" City - 'Foo 's ~iA21,. F~.•~- 'lo~~ aJ~_' ~a~:n_'ielA
i2oo~ o~e~tion, :fikiao,ping Canirter on:57,11th -.aoo sm:110- - - -
-1-0 ~li~~ :.4r _~,c:~lgp: i o.~ q;~al? s~~rbL, p-cb? e~es 'CIt23 `tO' ill3cttt3'~,'on, poo~- ~o.p«~~
L,lr?T't~~ L3lv~ U;L~~~":~ES a ;ta~ cL.oyy 3s ¢ar -1cn and operatlon,
~~'a i~ocd I1~oan - Le.~~~~m~ct 'YO:r 2~0: honies and no,~. ~Yia~rs' ~ 340: connec}ed. -
be1le 'Te-i-re Lagoon -:iavaloteej .d,o~ipzd 6-01.1on oriadcli-LUorAl 1arid raedad io~ l3 a- oon e.4pan-31or..e ,
4s Iz~ ~Ci~oi Co11~3~ ~oori- - S or!i~`~r~u uie _ wi=Ln x lu atua-tion of siudant ,pP~Iation. .
Gdcd. Sa'j"narit2in- l~[u?~sing I {ome. S:cma t roubZe i~? th opie r~ cn. .
Pa-~~:r•Led '=ti-I13.s I-aoon
GuY-:tIs Club' ?ar°.t - 'Commmunitf :tanic wi Lh .sPw3g3 su"3ci~n4,o
r,'Lntinen~al. Ci I~g,oo'n - Bad ape 3iion;
A1`oha 'Su-1td-I.•ii~J.on Cdoi f rcm glahic, i►_~r~h :St~.-•r ,~13::~V ~ Ju~t c?-as~ci 'by }f~alth- Disto , Otier ZOO jptiorie ..ca31s :~ihen p?3z~t ~aYlQc~,
. YJas -stivposed to te~Aesignad , to 'r:aNdle all. slLC,-Xe in CoQin~je,
, - 32 my l1ion ;al, nar- year,. c
,uartiti~es of ,san3 ~r.~m :c~ss~o~ls, .
, Pi.o., pratwzatmant or acresriino ~and pI~Lnt was oy~.r~:c~;c:ed.
P3ans mant throu h 4 datits ana i -OL. laste3 only a felw
monihs o
~j ~ , or ~ ~ rghle:~s ,as f o31~o~~s 1. Too. sma~ ~ .
~ ..~da~esign..dor- ovsrbuilz)
' 2,, Unqualified, oper3.cor3
31 Cw4aaz ,dea--!§-n"t .wan~v- to PaY ccst oi ~ otsr eneration-
~o Surve probl_e-m-8
56. ;ido on-sxta-im.pections. or moil ana-l;/si3.
z
i ,
3 .
• .
.aaL~~R%UX1D Or: P.ROBL..,i ~R.S.aS Iy SPC::.L.;:: Co0°~1~:TY trtirH Z'rl'iS'aRD TO SE,sMCE BrSFCSAL
-
Submitted Sept. 8, 1977
to -
• Spokane 'Oountf Commissionars
by
Joan konic3n _
1) According to Soil Cohservatioa Se=vicz n3p3, nost of Spokane County h.as serious
limi ting factors for dra.infield disDos31. Mucn of the Valley floor h3s tha
opaosite pro'olem in that it is too pernea ale ar.d preser.ts little or no protection
for our pxi.celess, sole-source 3quiier.
2) "The vertical distanCe froim cont3nir3ting point to the xater table h3s no great significancein the case of chemi^,3.1 eontaminants g esgecially xhen Iarge
quantities of flushina- water are involved." (Esvelt-:axton Report, Dec. '64)
° .
3) ?'wo docu;nented instances of xell co:►ta.t in3tion were frotm salts not tacteria.
Q>>e well (the ;reat Northern in nillyard ) supoosedly had 130 feet of protgc tion
from its source o'tr contami-nation. O:1ce polluted, even paople tuo miles no:-th in .
Morg3n Acres complaine3 of the taste or their water, haiser Trer.twood's well w3s
31so contamin3ted by chlorides. The s31ts traveled vertically to thP water tab2e
and then about 1,000 feet to the well, 'air.ce the Kaiser xell is in an are3 0°
gre.a.ter aquifer flow it is or.ce again usacle but, the Hillyard well, outs;de the
area of ma jor flaw is still snut daAn. :'h° uells wer~ contaninated 23 y►ears ago.
4) S o-called Sec ondary Packaere rlants d o r.o to ranove chemicals. They are only
glari-fie,l septic tanks discharpin-r to a sin&?e dxaxnfield and, since the Dept. oC
Ecolody refuses to issue 'rlaste Disc:►arge par►.tits, no testing is heir.g dona on
quantity and quality off erfluer_t fro.m thesa ]~Ia.nts. :le therefare have no a3sis
fQr co.p3rison to support such plants as zn improvenent over indivicual spptic
t~nks. I have been unable to find ?ny t3n,ible d3ta on voluma of disc'-naroe in
rzl3tion to depth of penztration in extTe::ely permeable soil. I have heard that
some tests of local wells havE turnsd up-C=:w high nitrate counts thus suvpo.rting
my contention that conta.mination or an undPrground water supply is an insidious
thin;. Alost of• the testinp is for colifom bacteriu but it apFears the greatest
danger lies in the cumulative efT ect of chQnicals which do not dissiFa.te li'r.e Itae
b3Cter13.
5) Theze are no "Stand3rds" for a-round„3ter. With all the natiorial emp'rasis on
vrotection of surface wa ters thpre is a cleat nessa;e to those ~►ho don't u3nt "o
be hassled by DCE and EPA to discharge to dr3in:'ields. Tney will not 1n3ve to get.
pexznits or do any testir.o ar:d, as a result, no one will have the nard c3ata neEded
to dsternine the extent of our dispQSal prablems. Proof oc this attitude is th~
flak the City receives _°or the ness at Lon? Lake •.cnile. the Cour.ty reinains o:t the
• sidelines ua-jcathpd. The County even a3cs to the Cxty's problems by usir.z-, t'r:a Gity
treatment vlant aa a drop for somz of the n3.llions of g311ons o° sludge punPe3
3nnually fro;n County seFtic ~an'r,s 3r.3 cess gools, i he resi is dumpzd at strategic
1 cfcati on-z all ar. ound the County Kh?re i t oo2zs to the suzAface despite any ef forts
to cover It. The Copanty, sna-.:?d be nar.ed ?-pa..rty to any legal act.ion instituted
tiy re;ulatory 3;sncies ror refusinj to assume its responsI'Dilities to F=ovide '
?dequ3te d3.spos;l oatside the City 116mits. f r ths Valley incorporata-s g it •.:ill
ir- at least the Sth 13rgest city in 4he state and yet, it's gotten afree ride
all these years on the 'oack a`_' the Ci4y. If the City shoul3 0pt for subsu.:face
dYSposal uould our problens be over?
. •
Fff. 2
0- 1
r) Tna plans f or the :No; th Star ~'ac!c?;;- Flan ~ f n I~f ezd KA11t t~'LY'Ollah ~ our a;enc~.es
and the plar_t di3n't 1?st even a ye3r. Gver 200 c311s -were receivBd f n on2 day
about the stench fron a sp-zrsely populated, are3. I don't need to tell you u:-1at
will h~Dren if' the oroposed 170,003 3cri plaat ooes bally up in this densely
popul3red arez. SCAFCA has recez ved 33 conp? ai*xts on odors fro, p:.ants ar.d 13-
,gooas si.nce 974 and we all ;cno:r tn3t's just the tip of the iceber;. I►;any xrnald
czll the zaalth District or other a-renCies or not even bothet-. ^he Dept. of Ecolorgy refusps to assume its nandated responsfbi3xties under
'RC:-4 o0.48. Iwrotp John Arnquist, 52VP?"?1 monLns aSo regaraing, the illpgal con- .
struction at tiidilome ar.d, io date, h3vz rzceived no reply. 10C1 90.1:8.I10 states.
al l plans 3nd s peci i ica tiar.s ? or the c or.s truc tioa of na w sewer3ge sys ~ems,
sew3ve tre3tment or disposal pl3nts or systems, and the proposed method of
futU?"~ oper3tion and nraintan.a.nce oxl said * 3cility or facilities, slzall be sub-
rlitted to and be approve3 cy the cannission, bsrore cor.struction thereof m3y
Empnasis supplied) In additi on, RCW 90.48.162 states, "Any caunty or _
3ny mun3.cira_1 or public corporation ogzratiner or proDosirg to opsrate a sewerage
sfstem, includ9.ng any system which collzets only domestic sexezaoe, which results
in the dispasal of waste nateri3l into the •.raters of the state snall procura a ,
yerrnit fro„ the deDartment of ecoloay before so disposing of sucn materials."
(Emph3sis supvlied)
: 8) 1 harz is a na jor disagreensnt batNeen the two state agencies DCE a.ztd DSNS
as to who is responsf ole fo= apgrovin~ pl.ans for p3Ckaae pl3nts like I-lic~ilo~ce.
To;i Just~ls o? DSi~S naintains tn3t ~lAC 243.9b uas nsver meant to apply to
nech3nical plants o= this m3gnitu3e and 'ne ean obv3.ously not do 3 job xith only
threz people on his staff to cover all o`_' Eastern Washington and hS.s resgonsibil-
i}ies for drinkina water supplies, .4 close re-,din~ oi ~'ne De~initioas section o£
VAC 243.95'. 020 would seem to support Tom's 3.aterpretation thus ;ivin,g D0Z. primary
r:I-i-sponsibility for approvino p].ans. This must be resolved.
9) There is anothzr fur_d3nental disaSrezm4nt betwzen the County En~in2srs and the
Health Districti regarding drain°ield desi~n. 'r:ealth District regulations allow
twic2 the 30D loading that the Coun+..y En'ineers will acczpt for m3co. It is obvio•.ts
Lhat responsibility is so fractured for app=oval o: lcack3ge p].ants th3t it will
require a najor effort on the Fart oi evzryone cor.cerned to st-mighten things out. _
10) No one can provi3e me uith data on tho. actual dAficit the CounLy is presently
x-unr.inv on the eight plants and lagoons it opex-atps an3 ye~, thPy are plannir.g to
asaume three more this ye3r. Also, nost people are unawarz of tha fact that thp
Couraty Park Dept. h3s mads a commit;nen-t L*o ^3intain the grounds around ten sewa-Te
plants. Thsy are -oresently M3in~ainino tZYae in return Llor $28, 000 in equipaent
eiven them by the County Engineers. Wh? twe havz is a"r•:ickey 1.11ous2 sewacae systzr~.
camincr in tn:rou;h the ba.ck door with a11 kir.ds of hidden subsidies, 'rfe even h3iipe
'srall irrigaLion districts such as 'Jera o-eeratir.g rack3ae pa.ants and lagoons at a
loss to their customPrs, but rz:r 3 L:end boar3 meetin~s to le~n thay ara pic~cin~
u'o this loss xith their elec trical r3tss. You also gst Vera in the posi tf on o°
h~vin; t~o apgrove plants witho:~t the exp-rixse to do so. Yf the Cc~.~nty En~ins~r~
?rnn't going to oFerate afacility :hey dca't approvz tho- plans. ihis oper.s up the
po3sibility that Jera might accn-plt, a plant „ith the realtn Distric+,'s higher '
loadircg desinn and there~ ore compound thsir rzd in'r WhQn the dra.infield h3s to be
replacsd. The question remains as to whJ they cor_tinue to accept plants rather than
givir.ty them to the County Engineers i or operation?
_ p~• 3
• 11) ine graunds around some plants are actually called mini-w-arks and children
are encouraged to plzy in the ozly op-n srace in a subdivision. Thzra is a potential "3ttractive nuis1nce" proble;i ia the event tna.t a chi3d uould be in-
,jured or drawned In ona o= these facilities. Removable grates or screenir.g are
not required 3nd liability is not clear since the Cour.ty cannot actually oNn the
Dlants since it tt3s Mo Conprehsnsive Sewer Plan. The t:idilome plant irill ba A%enced
but fenczs h3ve never stoP ad curious childran attracted by churnin~ water and the
hum of pumps and xe are discussir~; a p?3nt L1rger th3n m3ny sximmino pools uith 10
to 12 feet of muck. So far we't•e 'oeen luc;:y and have only had rocks throxn into
the sew3;e aad pumps unpluoged. We'd liica to :cnou if sueh installations are evert
insurable? - • .
' 12) Tnare is no clearcut responsitaility or centralized d3ta on such opzrations
1n3, since permits an3 testirg are nil, 3t is impossible to nake any I:ir.d of
r3tional decisions reogarding their efficacy. To take the position tha.t itaving a
callection system in the P;round suFarcedes all other concerns it irresponsible.
There are other nore inpoztant considerations than the dubfous chance that you ~
night at some fLture da te be able to pick up sa;ne of these systems. The long-range cwts of nunerous lift sta.tions and excessive energy use could outuzigh the
nebulous bQnefits. vot the 1e33t af our concerns should bee---Are Ke creating a
greater potential for cont+ni:ation by consolTdating the wastes fro:n over 400 hanss
in one sn311 area? The attached data from a book in the County Iibxary called,
"Urb3n P13nning Aspects of ;later Pollution Control" by Sigurd Grava helps put
the packa'e pl.a.nt dilenna into perspactive. • 13) There is a majar ore3kdoWn in the pl.anning- process right rere at the local
level whan a m3 jor modification to condations and to z firal p13t can be initiated
zncl constzvcte3 with no opport::nJi-ty for ad jacent progrxty o••:ners to be frf orn, e3
a ba►st an installation that coa ! d have an extremely nega-tive devaluation L*"fect.
G onditi ons 3re vzigu~, Responsi bility is not clear. Ar.d we've bean advised by
several pr ople tn3t cons 4ructi on pri or to agproval is corLnonplace. At le3st o::e-
third of all pro jects go in this way an3 we are told that ' no one has the ?uthor ity
to do anythina about it. We zre no longer n3ive enough to assume regul3tory
agPr.cies arz doin~ thelr job in #'-et, we've bzcome cynir,3.1 to the extreme.
14) When I requeste3 a list os all nackaoe pla:n-ts and Zagoons in Spekane County -
from the Health bistrict, several weak-s ago, i uas told thsy dildn' t have one. '
Since they rrust approve all the dr3infields shoulcin°t they also nave some records?
:o'e h.a.ve also found tYtat not only does DCE refuse to put dcmes 4ic systens on perzid't they also refuse to require testino of ccmmercial installations sucn as--- Valley
Gensral ;-iospi-tal, Red Lion, University City, etc. Doesn' t, anyone care y:hat a
hospi -tal is dischacging to our aqui -it.er? . - • '
15) RC:t 58,17.160 (Plattin~ L~.t: ) requires th3t e~.ch znci every plat or replat o£ any
proper ty filed ror record shall--- "(1) Ccntain a statement of approval frozi the ,
city, town or county Iicense3 ro3a enaineer,..zs to the survey dafi,a, layout or
streets, alleys an3 other rigints of way, dzsign of bridges, sewage and water systens
and other structures," (Emph.a.sis supplied) Tne dedication on the fin31 plat contafns
no r` Ference to approved seFr3 fe disposal. '
. , • , -
. ' . • ' _ . • • ' . ~J.,`f1•i'L'
. . c. - ~ ~ `M : t •~~L.~.. ,
~ , _
- . . ~
!
~ '
,
. .
Q'JE3yIO:d3 SU±i•UTi ;D ''0 'c iO SPC;;A::E CGSJ:+TY CG;-::•rI35IC' ~.R3a tis . fHt: IIIDiLC,R~ RIEi: ;n:tI\%,.s
Sept. 8, 1977
Many hours ar_: nucn tho~.:;ht h3vz gone into tne questions's~.cbnitted tod3y ar:d I
hoge you appreciate the eiiart €x-ce^ded in tr„vinog to get answers priar to th,,_
h--3rin.::r. :dith so nany a.,encies h-ivie= a Liece of the action i-t's a3most 151pcSsi bxe
to zcquire data witliout dPVOting full time. The following qc:zstions wzre written
ranr.lom1J and most Fo-rtain directly -to thA i:idilone ~ub:ti vision and more speci`'ically
to the possible approved installation of a 170.000 gpd ;acka6ffe treau-Rent g??nt.
i. Wh3t is the soil cla.ssiLric3tioa in the dzainfield area? Any garc tests? tire soils
excessively Fermeat?e? 2, 'Jouhere fn the Rlsn Comnission file is the severe drair_3ge problem in ths S+!
corr~er mentionad. 'r;nat is the cause? Ho;•, and uherz xi21 h3ter be diverted?
3. What d3ta does the County have to supvoxt the i.nstallation af such a pl..znt as
an up;radirg? Is anythin~ avail3.hle on depth eL infiltration in relation to sLCh
voluntss?
4. Whzt Tercen~~ge of the 170,000 gpd will 'ae unrenoved chemicals sLCn as ritrates? '
5. `rThsre was the sewage collection system fnstalled in relation to the drinkin-c-
water lines? '
5. Did anyonz detenninP the adequacy far existing custo;ners befora appxovina an
additior.al 72 no.es on a xater supply system already overtaxed? Kermit ?udolc, Sec,
,ation, st3tzd at an annexation hearin~ on April 1~+, 1971, th~.t the
for X.o3e1 Irrig
district is daveloping by staJes ar.d would not add ar~y service area whieh mignt -
jeopardiza thz prinary duty o;" serving thcse already in the d3.strict. Gur pressu-re
is alr2ady nil on peak d3ys so his •71 statenent must be inopzrative. Also, 1-ia3el
is a Class I district uith no Conprenensive Plan as required since I973.
What is the p.c•ocedure (if any) for initi3tintr rehe3rings uhen modifica.tions '
tc conditxons az : contemplated? Tnare appears to be no uniform plan as soma go t,~
re-nearin; and some don't.
8. Since both the County En;ineers ar.d tne ifexlth Uistrict were aKare of the plan,
w'nat stew shol.zld they have t-a.ken? Anythir.g in tirriting?
9. Why doesn't the dedication on the final plat ev2n mention sewage disposal?
10. :now c3n the drainLield design problen bctween the Co. Eng and the Health Dist.
be resolved?
11. Have `lera Irri ;ation and others hAen na3p aware, of the fact that the Countf is
u;.llfn; to assumQ the c1?0 on p].ants and la~oons? _
12. Wh.3t is tne present itenf2ed do113r amount that •.re taxna.;r-rs are aLTeady ,
subsidizing pIants and 13goons we don't even use? We kno-4 the $5.50%onth ut3lity
fee to thz individual do3sn't 'r.egin to touch the actu3l cost. W:•,.a.t xa nee3 is a
tlZOrauzrh caGt/h~2nerit ana.lysis t'ra.i woulci include possibls danger to the aqui`'er,
major rep3irs, li3bilitiy arl deprQcia tion write-of fs amor.g otner t'r+.irgs. •
13. Since the dr-Zinriel3 in Aloha t+.3s already been revlace3 cwice, whare do we ga
from here? AYe the new leaca bed~ at riillvie•..• solvi.ng the drainaffe problp„ ?Ho:r
can tho- neu Fainted Hills plant ever work when it's in a n3tura1 drainne•fay 3T:-1
, the pipe to divert water flo-gincr dorin the hill is alrea3y two-thirds `'u31 or 'dzbris?
14, If you insist on ir.sta113tion of this plant (Iiidiloma) will you ;equ:rs
ca:lpliance tirith RCW 90.48 by the DC-C prior to furtner construction?
15. l,lill L uture conditions identi: y a resDonaible anency by name rathsr than v3;ua
ref'erances to "apprapr;atz" agencies? .
16. k'iat speci:ic stens will be tako-n to stop the comnon practice'or construction
prior to approva3? Does the County prespntly h3ve the legral authority to issue
injunctions in such cases? ~
i I. . .
'
, QUESTIO►iS
Pg. 2 _
17. Since we'rz taIkina- the larmzst plant, the County En;ineers h3.ve oDerated, it
would seen 3n EIS is in order. ::any in thi5 n2ighborhood are still on Frivate wells
and Nould r.ot b--- thrilla3 xith rectizr ;e `_`~an the 170,000 ;rd or effIuent. Is
Chester in the n3 jor ; low area of the zq:,i: er? Wnat is ac tually knoxn about
dir,Lc tion and r3te or rlow here an-i sta tic xater 1PVels? Several yzzrs a,o the
water t3ble in this area ucn-s dwindling rapidly. 18. How much slud ;e irill this plant gror',,ucs annually and whera k•ill it be dumped?
19. Since an °und3m-entzlly opvosed to c;lildren playing arvund the treatment
plants, xh3 t. c3n ba done to naka them nore saz"e? I xould suggest that any Hho
consider such concarns oc no consaquer.ce r:akA a trip to vie•~r the size and depth
o° this }~,Lf finished p~.nt,
20. Since the parmit fo: the drainfriel3 is illegiole, c.zn someone find aut wh3t, '
the fir.al c3uacity will actually b.- ar.d srnat the permit cos t? •
21. Why doesn't the proposed i•i&0 call cor up'{eep oi the grmun3s surrounding the
plant? Ilon't it be a firetrap if allo*•red to dry out and dazsn't tha p?ant •
ranu:acture netlrana as a waste pra3uct? 1= so, how will the netliane oz disposed
o-f a.nd will it cause an Q3or vro3lem? •
22. I h3ve not even been ablm. to gst a 'Li :ure on total land sat aside for the '
ti13nt, drainrield and (Ihopr) bsffers,
23.Is any or the "208" study beirig dono- in are3s xith high volume discharZzs
of eft luent? :Joulcin't this ce the nost appropri? ta place 'Lor sensing dsvices?
24. k'h3t xili be the projecteu energy use for Atidilorae? Any lift st,atior_s?
Ch2orin?tion? Spaca sat aside for more {..ti?n one repl3czment dr3infieId? Anount
oF time require3 ea.ch day ror maintenz::ce, etc? Bra3k even point in contract? 3onding required? -
25. IT a collec;ion system is oc prime imDorLanceg why aren't dry Zines reasible '
until ue dzcide to en?inear a riAcent disposal systein? . .
26, r in311y, tr,,•ing to get iniorn3tion a*a I'midilorr.e h3s bezn tine consuaing and
'frustr3tin Q:~e thin~ is ;ivst ap~rent---Lre County is not in compliancz ::i th
Initiative 276 tn3t c,~c~.~~ l~.w year~ a~o. 276 h3s _n "acc?ss to Public Reeor3s"
!;,t1Y= 3~ requires indaxin~ or 211 public dccu:~ents and a desi~n~.ted pu olic docunents
o°z icer wno has sgm-ci? 1 exrartise on wh.3t is pu blic and xnat is r_oti. Cnl.y your '
Par;c DYpt. ias dona the job as far as i can tell an3 a trainina sessxon=by the
ntty. Ganzral or the Pros. Atty, is lonZ ora?-due. Please advise wh3t suecific '
steps you are takinz- to ca:nply?
I tirould hope to meet wiih your staff to ai-scuss the ans wers to each of the a oove
as they ar2 all le;;iti~nate questions dessrvin~ of a response. Flease nail your
Written'xesDonse to---
Ja3n ?ionica.n S. 3904 3o:;disn Rd,
Spok3ne, WA. 90205
~
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
J ~ ~ Z E O S t q ~ R E G I O N X
~~i A su 1200 SIXTH AVENUE
~ ~ ~ SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 9$101
y ~ ~
~r~4 PR7~
REPLY TO
ATTN OF: M/ S 443 RE CE IV E
~
Sept. 7, 1978 S E P 12 1~i;
Spokane County Planning Department SPOKANE COUNTY
North 811 Jefferson PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Spokane, WA 99201
Dear Sirs:
We have completed our review of your draft environmental impact
statement for the Midilome Subdivision in Spokane County, Wash-
ington and would like to submit the following comments for your
consideration.
The draft EIS presents a detailed discussion of geologic structure,
the water quality monitoring proqram, and the water quality of the
Spokane Ua11ey - Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer, but fails to address a
number of items which are needed to adequately evaluate the impact
of the projects upon the Aquifer. The final EIS should address the
following concerns:
1. 4Jhat is the planned size of the project, 425, 343, or 415 lots?
2. The text indicates tha t 21 or 24 units are already using
separate septic tanks. The location of these units should
be indicated on a map, showing their relationship to the
proposed central treatment plants drain fields, nearby off
site drinking water wells, and off or on site monitoring wells.
3. Proper site selection and design for the central drain field
are important to protect the Aquifer. The final EIS should
provide a detailed specification presenting a map showing the
location, size and type of treatment plant, a cross-section
of the drain field showing the gravel fill material, depth
of undisturbed native soil or fine-grained fill material
prior to the coarse gravels and a detailed description of
the soil types or aggregate beneath the drain field.
4. Moni tor7 ng we1Is shoul d be` pl.a~ced ;between the, dra i n fi=e1 d
-and Arinki;ng wate_r_ wel l'~s :and nea-'r -surface runoff ~.ca`tcfi ,
~basi ns- and d:ry -w.el l s i'n order ~to ~~determi.ne any water qual'i~ty
impacts resultIng from the ~praj`ect...
,5.. Si hce the eff°l`uent: from th'i s project: wi.11 not be di si;nfected,
what I s tti'e expected number of fec"al col fforms per ;ml
,6. ~Jh'at :wi 1~1 be the des:i.gn, and l'oca'ti-on of t"h~e °d~ry wel l s.or
catch: ba:stns'? Al:so,.what_ da.ta iis auai l,abl.e to .suppor"t- the
statement., on page 18, 'tha~t the soi,l col.umn~ beneath tlie
dry wells or _catc.h'- ba'si'-os wi-ll remove substanti.al, amounts
.of- s`urface runoff contami nants.
7. Monj tori ng systems and sub~sequen;t correcti ve trea-tmen~t. s'houl'd
~be~ detai:l ed to show h,ow. the aqui fer "wi'l-l ':be protik-ted.'These
deta:i l s s.houl,d i n-cl,ude : 1 o.caon of moni to:ri ng we] l.s =frequency
and water quali.ty components to, be, ana-lyzedprocedures and'funding med'Fiantsms. for up.grad;i:ng the, treatment fadlityantl
the plan for op:e.rat'i"n.g and ma~i~ntai~fn'g. the t=,reatment p:lant.
~8.. Where, fs the new dri nki.ng: water 'wel l to be l ocated?
We are en'cIos:i-n;g. copi.es of the. EPA I,nterim Primary Ori:nki'ng Wate:r :Regu`-
1 ati ons~ -'Control of Organ ic Chemi cal Co,n:tami.nan_ts i n Dri nki.ng Wa,ter
and the Guide'li,nes for Re~view -o.f EIS;'s isubject to 5ecti~on 1424-(,e) of*
the Safe D"ri nki ng Water, -Ac"t. We. fiope these .do.cuments wi"l l be~ of use-
i:n prep,ari;ng envirmental impact ~~s~ta'tements *for- subsequent- p~rojects~.
We appreci,ate the opp,ortun~ity -to;,,re.v~i~ew thi-s draf~t envi~ronmenta~l impact:
s:ta~tement. P1.e~ase~ do: n'ot h_esi~tate to conta-ct :me' .or Denni~s 4ssenkop', of
M, _ staff,, shouId you 'have: questi ons or :,des,i:re further i nfonmati-on _ re,gard-
i ng. ~our ~comments:, 'We `can be r.:eached at (206) .4~_;42-~1:-285 or FTS.)3g9=1285..
Sincerely,
A1exandr,a -.0. ~Smith., Chief
Envi ronmental 'Eval uati on Br-anch
.
.:b-,J,`~S'~ ' 4~i '•~-:D 1~ ~;r.•~~~~~ - _ - - - ~
yF''P~;
'h~~ -E E'~~Y j , ` •S• ~R _ I~/ I _ ; ' _ i~
~ - ~ ~J f-ilf ~ r ' ' . . _ - . . . . ~ . ^
a ~f~~ y~ .lt`Y_t~,. i'~tt^l • ~~,5'~i~~~" ,
PLANNifVG "D.E,PARTMEiV;T
P.UBLIC WORK8" BUILGING N:.8,11 JEFfEA60N STREET ~
PH ONE,4bH=2Z74
SPOKANE;.WASHINGTON~~ZOt
~
f-
••~-1NJw-?~'. ~T~i ~'11~.j ~~et .~Y.lN^~,L: " ' _ 1'l ~~5:.
i. II .
3p6KA(1GC0usn"COU-.VT NOU3.[
1+01S`~ a (1 m-l,:A J
' T.O: -A~mt ~ , W -4~i24~Si ~rr~ GOft" 'Ph~.i¢r -
R~h s `~r'flin' ,~t}~•:ToM:~'uS~us.
Y y ,
FRQM,: ~Spokane "Couiity Plannirig Department Date 7a
N6r'",tli:$11 Jefferson
Spokane,; WA _~9;9201
:5094-456=2274
Attention;_ ~ "
EFE CE;: LFAD AGENCY DEStIGNA?ION
~ ;~~6-
OF'-'SPO~ ~ _KANE COUPITY~
Pur auant -to ;the zSta"t:e Environmental-. Poli-cy . A_ct, WAC: 19?-10'-203C 3;?
. _ , . , . .
- - - - - _ -
,a divi dioa of ~~Spoka~e Couiaty,; Y~ta~s. de.termine:d. that the.,Courity~! as ~au ACTING~ AGENaY; .
-i:-6; <tre :3JEAD` AGcMCY: for "the , ~followi_~g ~ described ~pr-o;ec-t=` : - -
911D l l.NZ _ - - .0~ -1;(6
The' fo11:o,W-big is an 'explanat'ion for tYiie; .d'eteririination_: - _ - ,
If your agency, --fe;el;s :it sho,uld be !MDAGFNCY', pl"ease_ contaet; the oi.iice ab.ove~.
A~j .:GA% ,LS balm~~ '~ARL~n=
15 =119LCT .V1fI 'LL- A. , ' , - :z-
'S'1 Ot~l .
1
~ OFtICE OF TN'E -
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNI'NG DEPART_'
MENT
-
oatis 9_
WE, ltriys; Sterl=ing,, R. 103 , IndianaTo Gene Pra~ther,. ~Spokane Co. Health, District
FPpm Thomas G.,. Mosher _
Midilotne, "
Subiect - . -
I: hoPe that we. can ~count upoa y.our xegular. input a.rid . assistance: wi:th regard to
the Groiind Water. .se.cti.ons of -this EI&.. Mimally-, I'would like 'to. ask tYiat you partici-
:pate ;iaith .ine iri the reyiev of the ~ground' :water -secti-,ons._of --the preliminary MEIS, pr.ior-
to, ;pubUcation. I'f ~you ,would like to -.work iri:th•.,t'he' consul~tan!t (Iiaworth aind, Anderson, Inc e)
:-as they~ :prepare th~is~ _prel"iininary DEIS., pleaset so state: to., me,,arid I.will arrange it.
TM/sb:.
cc. HawortYi ;and .Anderson-, -Inc-.
~
1
. . . • ' = - . . . . . _ . _ .w.-.--.---- . - t'
♦
OFF-ICE OF TNE.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANHING DEPARTMENT
April 17 78
Dc~t~ 09
To Rober;t. Tonili:rison,
- -
Fipm- Fred L-. Dayharsh_ . .
-S11bi-oC1 M i `Ai'1 nmA Prnngh%p1
. _ . .
We tiave pro;ce.sse: your administrati:ve•; -Expense: kgreement: with re,gard: 1:o preparing
an -EIS' for ;Midilome,. TYie' sta~ff: will. 1now be able to, work- w~:th your, „consu:'tant(~Hat;ro.rth
and. Anderson, Inc.,.) a fi=rm whose ability ve are, f__.amilar wi"th arid bf whichwe app.r:ove..
Please; :be aware that :the sensi.tive riature of your proposal and its exi"staric& over ~tYie
aq.uzfer may. make- 'tYiis ~EIS and ~its su°ti`sequen~t, proce'ssing parti~cul:.arly tedious. :Please
,have-your -consultant^ contact- us to organize thle-- EIS'` ;and ~decide. -upon the .el,ements .of the
environmeritto b:e co.vered~.
FLD/t~n/smb
jcc Havjor-th .a.nd Anderson; Inc-.
_ . ._-_=-J_- _ ._.____~..r._.. ~ - . _ - o,
- _ - - - - .
~ ' "r' i.~11X,',`C.I i'~ •i ~f ' ~y ~ ~ ~ ' . ~s.. ~ A v ~
~,`~~f • ✓t~' , . ai
.y.~ti. Z ]1~ t;~ • ~ J7 , , t 'r , ~'Y~ ' ~~""~...~:t-~: C' 1 `
r+_ y,.~ , a , t ~ ~ ~ ~ , ` , •~.xy ~ -.~.5►~- . .
t : •
~'~"...~'~4 • . ` • x~. C '~i►~l-►"F'~ • c VE
~ ,~,~a,,,. f ; ~ ~ 'Y''r ~ • L]
" V ~ " ' ,.t ' ~ •k . . , . , c1'• ` _ ~2': ~ • a.~ =
~ (j T ..~er+',:~~}~r • ' ~ y~' , ~ • ~ ` i I ~ ` ~ ~
~,rT,~.~„j,'. , ~ : • er~~ ~ y ~ .2~ 3'`J~sl ~~~.5' L~ • r.YE.. ~ • ' ~ : ~'i s ~ ~ N n W AYt:
7 y.~►}~"~ .
'ta~ ~ 4 . . ~ ► r ~ ~ "r~~ 2 ,ri:.~„,.•, .y
• A ; ~ • ~ ~ . ~ ~
~~'L ~ 2,• n ~ ~ K ~ QV E 't, i ~ ~ 1~: ~l'Y a. ~ ~ `y ♦'f r.+ Qv C
.1T F.:~ ~ r •~J~"r ~ , 4~.. , , ~ . • r -
~ ` ~ 26
'L 7 T 1"~~ . ~L I`~. p tN AV k. ~
~ • } ' ~ ' ` ~ :
27
) v , ` , i - . Z.~.T ~ ~ `'ti ~ 0 .ri ~ 4'C~L.
~ . ~ ~y ~ ~l . ~ , \ • ~ ~ lytw AYt_
''~.6.~• _ t ~ - ~ ' ~ ^ V ~ ~ 1'
{~c~T►-~ rr r• ~ ~ \~CL. y . ;~t ~„~C.
~ LJ
~ 'Qi ~ `G► r.~J ~ ~ y N t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' J L
k ~ ~ r~"~ ~ . °4 ~ v ~'~t • r ~1~,
~ -g ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~a• ~ .t, } ~ .
n v 3~j ~r-, z ~ ~ ; g ` o°~. ~ ~R ~ ~ ~ ` Q , ~ .
~ M , • d~ 1 ..Q ~ ~ •I~ ~j'
~ ~ , ' 1~ . ' • ` • o w i ~ 1~. ~~~,,,~-~j ~ rAu t ~ ~ . . _
3J ~ .s,.vP• ~ ~,~~.1. e~~7" "a r~, ' '
ai~,s;,a..~t. ' ~ , r' YNV • . 1 ~ ~ ' ' ! • , , ~ !L"1
~ ~ ' , ~ . ~1~_`.J • ~ . f ~~j~ • ! 'ti .
, ~ ' t i ~ •
-•a J ~ ' • ~ . ' ~;.j -
16 _i ^~4 j •
'i ~ ' ~ ~ , t ~ •
,
` • 4C1 i ~ v
k"
■ ,
,
~ , .
SNP7
, . ~
.,l rr
1 tiL~` ~ `~N ~ ' J ~J~ ~ , ~t
Ci • `
~t ~ r ~ ~ ' ~ '
4 1 Lj
~ l
: S~ER ~4 ,
6 ~ p a r a t 1 e ~
dad
fi S j a n
r
1 . \ ' I i ~ _ ~ I _ •
• l • 3 ,r„ _ - ,
..r..t J'• • " "'.~...tr. ` ' . ' `3' • _ _ _ _ 1 - - ~ ' ~ ~I . ~ _ ,
A A
~ 2 it. • .
u , _ , _ • . R P E
. Z~- ~t,
, Q ~ • G.. ~
~
t < •~jf:: { c
h r.. _ QI T
r
_ `
LAbV OFr ICES ,
DELLWO, PUDOLF & 5CHROEDEk), P.S. '
ROBERT D. OELL11fC7 1016 Ol0 NtAi'IONAL BANY. BU1Ld1TSC~
.
K'rRMIT Ivi. RUDOLF SPpKANE, WASHINGTON 99201,
RlCNaRD J. SCHROEDER (-q og) E2,- 4Z 91
TERRY W. lvtARTIN
1'ERRY T. GRAhl7 ~ _ .
MEDI_EY W. GREEtdE . .
RQBERi J. R08ERT5
. august 22 , 1978
Spokane County Planning Commission -
Spo!cane County Courthouse
•
Sookand, Washi ngton 99201
. Re s W1idi l ome Fi rst Addi tian
Gen tlemen : '
This i-jill advise that the 'lands in the proposed Miciilome Fir1st '
Addi ti on are i ncluded vii thi nthe boundari es of Model 1 rri ga*ti on
0istrict cioa 18 and oresently are a part of sai d di stri ct. .
The anriexat7on order of said lands provides that said lands are
entit]ed to viater service from th+e district subject to the developer
install ing at his expense mains to and within sai d lancis and maki ng
available to the district a site for an additional v1e11 and a s-it2
for the Gonstructidn of a resFrvoir which aaill provide adciytiona1
storage capacity for the distriGt. Tentative arranyements have been -
made for a11 of these rratters bvt i t i s not ant7 ci pated that the same -
V» 1 1 be compl etad and aetuall,y cvnstructed un ti.l _ the pl at has bAen
approved and the lots therein made available for sale. ihe district's .
eng ineer presefitly is completing suryeys 1"n orcier fio Fstab7 i Sh the
iEgal descriptl'on$ of the wellsite and the reservair si te-and it is
anticipated that as soon as this has been done that the same wi11 be
doedad to the di strict so that the distri ct may have the s ame ava i I a b1 e
for inatallation 9f Vaz17 and canstruction of a rEServvir at such tiriie
~ r ~hz fza~ure as tne di stri ct deter,77ines t~te need exi sts.
Al 1 of the lands Yn bli di 1 orne Fi rst Addi ti on : cinoer the t2rms o lf- the
annexation or•der, will be Sub,lect to pay3ng as confleGtions are madc
to trzo- di stri cttl s system, dn equal izing or annexation charge whi ch
vii 1 7 be arrived at after taki rg into account the casts of f,he di strict
providing the additiana~i pumping and stordge capacity needed for t1j(-. -
sArvi ce of sai d lands o A1 i of tnisis understvod hy the developer
and steps are being taken ta have fi.he same accomplished and th¢ district
~
;
C t f,
C_
Spokane County Planning Commission -
PaSe 2 August 22, 1'978
, has been assured by the dev2loper that,all of the itPms vrill be
taken eare of before the time arrives for actual water service. _
pccordi nqiy, the di stwict knows of no r2ason why sai d lands nay not
be considered for platting on the basis of water service from the
district.
Yours respectfully
,
KMR jb gy o Kermi t P-t. Rudol f
Secretary
Model Irriqation District #18
ee Bob Toml inson
Boa rd o f Directors
°'1odel Irrigatiora District. '
~
~ Transameric . Transamerica
' Title Insurance CompTitle InsuranLe Service North 720 Argonno RoaU A • '
Spokane, Washington 99206 ECE
~ (509) 922_2222 R I V E
JUL 19 1919
CERTIFICATE TO PLAT SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Order No. 96296-M d~ i E
Certificate for Filing Proposed
Plat of MIDILOtIE 1ST ADDITION
Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington
Gentlemen: .
In the matter of the plat submitted for yoiir approval, this Company
has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of
Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United
States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination
hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate
in Spokane County, to -wit:
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 33, Township 25
North, Range 44 E.W.M., situate in the County of Spokane, State of
Washington, described as follows:
Begin at the Southeast corner of Lot 4 in Block 3 of MIDILOME ADDITION,
as recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 18; thence North 00°06'10"
West, along the East line of said Lot 4 a distance of 135.00 feet;
thence South 89°47'00" East a distance of 9.55 feet; thence North
00°13'00" East a distance of 60.00 feet to the beginning of a curve
concave to the North with a tangent bearing of South 89047'00"
East with a radius of 1096.59 feet and a central angle of 6048'43",
thence Easterly along the arc a distance of 130.38 feet to the Soutg east
corner of Lot 4, Block 4 of Said MIDIL014E ADDITIOI`1; thence North 00 06'
10" ~lest along the East line of said Bloclc 4 a distance of 1113.09 feet,
thence South 89047'00" East a distance of 260.00 feet;thence South 86045'
20" East a distance of 76.15 feet; thence South 68°50'12" East a distance
of 137.51 feet; thence South 40°24'43" East a distance of 50.42 feet;
thence South 47°47'00" East a distance of 650.00 feet; thence South
50°36'27" East a distance of 97.41 feet; thence South 5$°14'S5" East
a distance of 43.43 feet; thence South 42°13'00" West a distance of
352.69 feet; thence South 46°57'S2" West a distance o£ 293.76 feet;
thence South 61°37'35" West a distance of 341.83 feet; thence South
76°44'08" West a distance of 218.29 feet; thence South 88°15'S3"
West a distance of 147.82 feet; thence South 79°17'00" West a distance
of 117.56 feet to the true point of beginning.
(continued)
~
~ • •
Page 2
- Certificate to Plat
Order No, 96296-M
• MIDILOME lST ADDITION
VESTED IN: EDGAR BUESCHKE and LOUiSE E. BUESCHKE, husband atid wife
as to the following described property:
Begin at the Southeast corner of Lot 9, Block 6, MIDILOME ADDITION,
as recorded in Volume 13 of Plats, page 18, situate in the County of
Spokane, State of Washington; thence North 89°47'00" West along the
South line of said Lot 9 a distance of 260.00 feet; thence South
00°06'10" East a distance of 729,79 feet to a point which is South
00°06'10" East along the West line of said Northeast quarter a
distance of 1401.80 feet and South 89°47'00" East a distance of 530.00
feet from the North quarter corner o£ said Section 33; thence South
89°47'00" East a distance of 197.84 feet; thence South 00°06'10"
East a distance of 540.87 feet; thence North.76°44'08" East a
distance of 141.76 feet; thence North 61°37'35" East a distance of
341.83 feet; thence North 46°57'S2" East a distance of 293.76 feet;
thence North 42°13'00" East a distance of 352.69 feet; thence North
58°14'S5" West a distance of 43.43 feet; thence North 50°36'27"
West a distance of 97.41 feet; thence North 47°47'00" West a distance
of 650.00 feet; thence North 40°24'37" West a distance of 50.41 feet;
thence North 68°54'12" West a distance of 137,51 feet; thence North
86°45'20" West a distance of 76.15 feet to the Point of Beginning;
EMMA HAWKINS, a widow, as to the remainder.
EXCEPTIONS:
l, General taxes for the last half of 1979 in the amount of $727.20
(Parcel No. 33541-9003) Affects this and other propPrty.
Records examined to May 8, 1979 at 8:00 A.M.
TRANS401fth' RICA T TLE INSURANCE COMPANY
BY: ,
ers ori
cc: Spokane County Engineer
cc: Simpson Engineers
mn
~
.iw ' f ~ ~ ~ ~ •
. r . . .
w `
3 Z 3't
~C O
1
.
1 ~
,
IDD
, .
g~ Q , v
- • ~ c, /S /1 V
i • ; i'o
ui
~ ~'•!~o
1 ~ ` ~O•
...i~ ` D j
1;z " 5 7 Q D
- Y771 a
~ ~
, a
Y MAR13 ND ; ,
: ,
~~~~ii• L7~~y " ~ ~ -
B
o a. a.
r~
o ~
.
126 i,
- ~ 113 41101/ 1 11
' .
~ Qc!!o _~Ib 1. _ , hww-- - - -
. - - • • • r.
"RANSAMtRtiOA TfTIE 1tVSURANC COMPANY ~ .
N{1a11i %70 ARG4NNf ROJD
S p~,<A,NE, wA 9 9 20~..
.r . ;
N
w
~ 4-
s ' I .
Ihis ptfilt i6 ma- 9niely !ot the Rurmt ot asstgttng
~
11ro• 4lir IhP (0R11~ nv AS5UMO"f RQ
' ou.'ity (Qt Wf,iiris i1 Anv, in .1inotnt rqs anQ
4^°,~f'ton.f.,9r'~1in~ ny ~ctwf surrey • ~ P ~
10
~
o~
~O O v ~
f
Y ~ • "
~ .
Pacrfic Northwest Bell
June 12, 1979
soe
Spokane County Planning Ccmmission
North 721 ,lefferson Street
Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION
Gentlemen:
Pacific Northwest Bell will not require utility easements within the
plat of Midilome First Addition.
A"-P *
G. D. Fleming
Right-of-Way Agent
North 904 Columbus Street
Spokane, vdashington 99202
GDF:bh
cc: Clarence E. Simpson, Engineers Inc.
; e
v ~
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER C0NCERNING PRELIMINARY )
SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION )
PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION, ) COMMISSIONERS' DECISION
AND ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE )
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Sponsor - Tomlinson )
This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington to render its decision concerning the request of
P9idilome, Inc., c/o Robert Tomlinson, GJest 606 Thirc! Avenue, Spokane,
WA 99204 for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone re-
classification; and
The Board having received the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning
Commission to approve the preliminary plat, subject to findings and
conditions as contained in the Commission's minutes of September 21,
1978 (continued to September 28); and
The Board having conducted its own public hearing on December 11, 1978,
at the request of Joan Honican, South 3904 Bowdish Road, Spokane, WA
and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and
The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon
the testimony submitted at tlie public hearing and other evidence available
to the Board to approve PE-1168-78, Plidilome First Addition_and the related
zone change ZE-13-78, Agricultural to Singl Family Residential, subject
to the Findings and Conditions as contained ~in the Planning Commission
minutes and PROVIDED, that this approval shall be subject to the approval
of all other state, federal and local agencies with jurisdiction.
The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order,
for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more
definitively the Board's action in this matter. "
BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 29 day of January, 1979.
VERNON W. OHLAtJD
Clerk of t oard
by•
R anne Montague, Deputy Cler
I I
BEFORE TNE BOARD OF COUNTY CUMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
IN THE MATTER CONCERNING A CFIANGE IPJ )
A CONDITION OF APPROVAL OF THE FINAL )
PLAT OF PE-1002-76, MIDILOME ADDITION, ~ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND ZE-34-76, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE )
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; SPONSOR: TOMLINSON )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County, Washington, wi]1 hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1978,
at its office in the County Courthouse to reevaluate its approval of a change
in the conditions of the above-mentioned final subdivision and zone reclassifi-
cation after having considered the Environmental Impact Statement prepared for
the entire Midilome project. The above-mentioned Midilome Addition is located
within the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) of Section 33, Township 25 North,
Range 44 E.W.M.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing
and present testimony in support of or in opposition to the Board's decision
to approve subject condition change, from on-site sewage disposal systems to
a public sewer system, in relation to the Environmental Impact Statement.
BY OROER OF THE BOARD this 16 day of October, 1978.
VERNON W. OHLAND
CLERK OF TNE BPARD
BY =
Rosanne Montague, Deputy Clerk
;
I I
BEFORE THE BOARD UF CUUtJTY CUMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, 4JASNINGTON
I N THE MATTER COPJCERN I NG PREL I i1I NARY )
SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ~
PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION, ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
AND ZE-13-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE )
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; SPONSOR: TOh1LINSON )
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
Washington, will hold a public hearing at 3:00 P.M. ON DECEMBER 11, 1978, at
its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above-mentioned preliminary
subdivision and zone reclassification on the following described property:
Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. NE 1/4 of
Section 33, Spokane County, Washington, EXCEPT Midilome
Addition, Also EXCEPT R/W for 32nd Avenue, also EXCEPT
R/W for Pines Road, also EXCEPT R/W for 6owdish Road.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVFtv that a topic of discussion along with the proposal will
be tne Environmental 1,~iNact Statement.
NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing
and present testimony in support of or in opposition to an appeal on said
matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners.
BY ORDER OF THE 60ARD this 16 day of October, 1978.
VERNON W. OHLAND
CLERK OF THE,,]BOARD
i /
.
,
BY :,r
osanne Montague, Deputy er~
✓
I
I
~ -
i-- ~
r '
NO. M1 ~ ~3 iS 9
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON.
IN THE MATTER OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM )
THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ) RESOLUTION
CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S SPECIAL HEARING )
OF SEPTEMBER 28, 1978. )
WHEREAS, The Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, pursuant to the provisions
of the revised Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620, shall upon receipt of any recom-
mended official control or amendment thereto, at its next regular public meeting set the
date for a public meeting where it may, by ordinance, adopt or reject the official con-
trol or amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by Resolution
No. 78 1334 acknowledge receipt of the recommendations from the Spokane County Planning
Commission concerning its hearing of September 28, 1978; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by said resolution
set the 16th day of October to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission
concerning its September 28, 1978 hearing, a copy of said recommendations are attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County,
Washington, that based upon the information available to the Board and the testimony
at that meeting, the following action was taken:
PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION: Midilome, Inc.
ZE- 13-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
Having received a communication in disagreement with the Planning Commission's
recommendation for approval of the preliminary plat re guest, the Board set a
date of at ~`~/h to further consider
the matter.
BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS ~ DAY OF 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
HARRY M. LARNEO, CNM.
.
JERRY C. KOPET
.1.. • •yrr . w ti .Ml
ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND
Cl of the Board
By :
" Deputy
I R ~ C
. F;
. 0 CT t)
coL
1 19ANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL REQUES'~j~'CC`~j M g
0~0
B' ~~ISSIpN
Your name: c )04~~ Date: `,.j /
Address: ~ f ~ `~~0,~~~/~ i~'~.~ • ~7 /-~l~ i~i~/l~ ~ 0 ~
Phone No: "7/ 7~" ~
. ~
Planning Commission Action Being Appealed ,
. .
' ' Z)%
r !
~
Title (7
I.D. Number Date of Action
Signature
~r
Your Reasons for Appeal: v
/ ~
?`E
r- ,
~ /U7_9~,~ T L:-- / S 0V (Z eNV /j) (f, Z' /0 I T/ D
` ` ~ ` • 1 J ~1, ~i
L
~ ,
~ X 7) L v / ~~J' / l~` ? / % ~ ✓ ~ C~ , ~ ~ %
~
Z- Z=- Z)
R E C E I V E
OCT1Gi978
SPOKANE COUNTY
P T
00 (4 •
PQa,1vMu1 o_ ~ o ~ ► 3 -~S
~ ! r' F
. ~
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260 .
October 4, 1978
~
Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Spokane County Court House
Spokane, WA, 99260
Gentlemen:
At the special hearing of the Spokane County Planni_ng Commission on Thursday,
September 28, 1978, at 10:00 A.M, to 11:55 A,M., reconvening at 1:30 P.M,, to
3:10 P.M., in the Hearing Room at N. 721 Jefferson, the enclosed action was
taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners.
Planning Commission members present; Mr. Ted McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Abby
Byrne, Mrs. Jane Myers, and Messrs, Culler, Kennedy, Quigley and Thomas.
Planning Staff present: Wallis D. Hubbard, Plat Administrator; Blanchard and
Johnson, recording secretaries. Engineer's office: Dobratz and Kennaly.
Health District: Prather. Prosecutor's office: George.
Sincerely,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Ted McCoury, Chairman61
~7 c- (20-'~
L 44~
Fred L. Dayhar , Director of Planning
TMC:myb
Official minutes and record of action
taken by the Spokane County Planning A LD P
I A L E D
Commission at their special hearing
held on September 28, 1978.
. MINUTES OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NEARING OF SEPTEM6ER 23, 1978,
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did hold a special public
meeting on September 28, 1978, (continued from a special-public hearing of Septem-
ber 21, 1978) to consider the testimony and requests of a plat applicant and other .
interested parties concerning the following referenced subdivision and zone reclas-
sification upgrading; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those
opposing all items of business; and
WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Myers, and Messrs. Culler,
Kennedy, Quigley and Thomas were in attendance for the entire proceedings, consti-
tuting a quorum at all times; and
WHEREAS, tne Spokane County Planning Commission fu11y considered the
testimony given, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recom-
mends to the Board of County Commissioners the following:
PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADOITION by Midilome, Inc.
ZE- 13-78, AGRICULTURAL to SIyGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL:
(Summary of special hearing of September 21, 1978: W. D. Hubbard pre-
sented Findings of the Staff with additional conditions of the County
Engineer which were read into the record at the meeting. Mr. Willard
Sharp, representing the sponsor, presented history of and request of
approval for Midilome. The sponsor also testified. Mr. William Powell,
representing Mrs. Honnican, presented opposing testimony. Testimony was
still in progress at 6:00 P.M., when meeting was adjourned and continued
to the special hearing of September 28, 1978, at 10:00 A.M.)
Hearing continued on September 28, 1978, with Mrs. Joan Honnican being
a major speaker for the opposition, along with testimony by others in
opposition. Rebuttal was presented by the sponsor and his representatives.
That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving, adopts
the Staff's Findings dated September 21, 1978, along with conditions which
were added at the hearing and read into the record, as the Planning Commis-
sions's findings of fact, EXCEPT that the following additional conditions
shall be added:
1. Phase Five, or an equivalent thereof, be set aside until 444
appropriate departments (D.O.E., D.S.H.S., County Health and County Engineering departments) have decided if an ~Oadditional drainfield is needed. ed
2. No lots may be sold prior to final written approval of
all required agencies. ,
4
(Motion to approve by Byrne, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous "yes."
3:10 P.M. PLAT HEARING ADJOURNED.
DATED THIS 4TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1978. By: Myrth Blanchard, Plat Secretary
For: Ted McCoury, Planning Comm. Chairman
Fred L. Dayharsh, Planning Director
J
~
ZONE RECIASSIFICATION
OR ° 2J
~PRELIMINARY SUBDI`TISION
.
ACTION TAKEN CAPPROVE
DENY
CONTINUE
LIENGTH OF CONTINUANCE
~
REASONS 1.
2.
3.
4.
CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning
Staff's Findings, Dated ,
and subject to the additional condition that
7--
-
~
2.
v `
,
G
3.
VOTE Motion by ,
U
Seconded by
~ VOTE 1YES / NO
1r ~
,
O
I T r ZONE RECLASSIFICATION .S • .
~
OR
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION 9- 78
ACTION TAKEN APPROVE
DENY
CO NTINU E ~ g /0 Q=~-
~
LIENGTH OF CONTINUANCE
J
REA,SO NS 1.
2.
3.-
4.
CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning
Staff's Findings, Dated ,
and subject to the additional conditions that
1.
2.
3.
VOTE Motion by
Seconded by
VO TE YES NO
y° ~ /l6 8 .~~-~G - ~~i _
G~~
r •
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
North 721 Jefferson
SpokanQ, Washington 99260
September 27, 1978
Honorable Board of County Commissioners
Spokane County Court House
Spokane, WA. 99260
Gentlemen:
At the special hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Thursday,
September 21, 1978, at 8:30 A.M., to 12;05 noon, reconvening at 1;30 P,M,, to
6:10 P.M, in-the Hearing Room at N. 721 Jefferson, the enclosed action was
taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners.
Planning Commission members present; Mr. Ted McCoury, Chairman; Mrs, Abby
Byrne, Mrs. Jane Myers, and Messrs. Culler, Kennedy, Quigley and Thomas.
Planning staff present: Wallis D. Hubbard, Plat Administrator; John Stoeser
of Short Plats; Blanchard and Johnson, recording secretaries. Engineerts
office, Kennaly. Health District: Prather. Prosecutor`s office; Emacio,
Sincerely,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
G ~
Ted McCoury, Chairman
L ~a G ^ 4Di"ec-tor Fred L. Day~ rsof Planning
TMC:myb
Official minutes and record of action
taken by the Spokane County Planning
Commission at their special hearing
held on September 21, 1978.
n p ~ C-c~i t~~
V
v . MINUTES OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 21, 1978
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did hold a special public
meeting on September 21, 1978, to consider the testimony and requests of two plat
applicants and other interested parties concerning the following referenced sub-
divisions, zone reclassification upgradings, and a short plat appeal; and
WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and
those opposing all items of business; and
WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Byrne, h1rs. Myers, and Messrs. Cu11er,
Kennedy, Quigley and Thomas were in attendance for the entire proceedings, consti-
tuting a quorum at all times; and
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission fully considered the
testimony given, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recom-
mends to the Board of County Commissioners the following:
The Chairman announced the hearing would address itself to preliminary subdivision
applications and zone reclassifications, along with an Appeal, promptly at 1:30 PM,
of a Short Plat Subdivision, with those items presented by W. D. Hubbard, Plat
Administrator, as to preliminary plat applications; and John Stoeser as to the
short plat appeal; and zach sponsor or his representative; followed by favorable
and/or opposing testimony from the audience, with rebuttal allowed the sponsor.
A. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
l. PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION by Wolfland, Inc.
ZE- 44-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary
plat request be DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This request was heard throughout
the morning and a portion of the afternoon, following the short plat appeal.
W. D. Hubbard presented Findings of the Staff, with Bob Bethards presenting
information on behalf of the sponsor, Vince Seipp, who also presented data
concerning Northcrest Addition. There was considerable testimony in oppo-
sition, with a petition bearing 150 signatures against the proposed plat,
along with several letters related to various facts concerning the plat
being presented to the Commission by the opposition. Discussion by the
Planning Commission and testimony by the sponsor, representatives of the
Health District, Engineer's office, Prosecuting Attorney's office; and
members of the opposition centered around the following topics: access
roads to the plat; traffic on Argonne Road; density of the proposEd plat;
the requirement by the Health District for a sealed lagoon; uncertainty
regarding the location of the drainfield proposed by the sponsor; heavy
concentration of nitrates in the wells in the area; statistics on automo-
bile and train traffic; soil and water runoff; erosion that comes with
construction; the "208 Study;" and various factors in the E.I.S.
A motion to approve, providing all problems could be met and solved, was
lost for want of a second. A motion to continue until after the "208
Study" is published was also lost for want of a second. A motion to con-
tinue for ten working days to determine issues of water quality, sewage
and density, was also lost for want of a second. A motion to table the
matter i ndef i ni tel y was, seconded, afi th two i n favor to conti nue , and fi ve
voting against a continuance.
(Motion to deny without prejudice by Byrne, seconded by Quigley. Vote was
six for the denial, with the Chair abstaining.)
-1- cont'd.
~ .
- ,
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING MINUTES
September 21, 1978
12:05 PJoon - Luncheon Meeting
Topics of discussion included:
Responsibility of the Planning Dept, with regard to the E,I.S.
Format of the E.I.S.
Special Hearings requested by plat sponsors
Homestead and Mt. Baldi on the same Agenda - recess and continue
another day?
Planning Commission Chairman and Director of Planning should
coordinate and plan an agenda that could be handled in one day,
Long Range Planning
1:30 P.M. - Reconvene
B. SHORT PLAT SUBDIVISION APPEAL
1. SP-78-059, Short Plat by J. Bevan. Appeal by Gaubinger. That the short
plat be DENIED. Because of a statement in the dedication of Myron Estates
that no more than one structure be placed on any one lot without filing a
replat, and also stated lots in this plat would remain one acre in size,
the question was raised as to whether or not a short plat is considered
a replat. The issue remained that the area was intended for one-acre
lots, which was a decision made with consideration of the neighboring
Ponderosa plat.
(Motion to deny the short plat by Culler, seconded by Byrne. Voting was
five in favor of the denial, with two opposed.)
C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS ANO ZOPJE RECLASSIFICATIONS
2. PE-1168-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION by Midilome, Inc.
ZE- 13-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary
plat request be CONTINUED to September 28, 1978, at 10:00 A.M. Because
earlier items on the agenda had consumed a good portion of the day, the
motion was made by Byrne, seconded by Quigley, that the Commission hear
Midilome until 6:00 P.M., and to continue to another day if not concluded
by that hour. Vote was six in favor of that motion, with one opposed.
W. D. Hubbard presented Findings of the Staff with additional conditions
of the Engineering Department. Mr. Willard Sharp, representing the sponsor,
presented history of and request of approval for Mililome. The sponsor also
testified. Mr. William Powell, representing Mrs.Honnican, presented opposing
testimony. Testimony was still in progress at 6:00 P.M.
(Motion to continue until September 28 at 10:00 AM by Thomas, seconded by
Quigley. Uote in favor of motion was unanimous.)
6:10 P.M. - MEETING ADJOURNED
DATED THIS 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1978 By: Myrth Blanchard
Recording Secretary
For: Ted McCoury, Planning Comm. Chairman
Fred L. Dayharsh, Planning Director
-2-
a
T+Je, Mr and Mrs. Howard "Bud" Watkins, living on the South East side of this
proposed development, would like to have the following information in the record
of this hearing.
We were approached by a representative of Mr. Tomlinson some time ago in rege.rd to
the property we own and have easement to adjacent to the development site.
We have a 20 foot easement from Bowdish to our East property line, and have been
paying taxes on that easement approximately 18 years. •
The representative of Mr. Tomlinson was of the opinion we should sign the ea,sement
over to the developer, plus give 10 feet of our property - to bring the road width
up to the 60 foot County specfications.
We want you, the County Planning Commissior., to know, even though we are unable to
attend this meeting, that we have no intention of signing over the 20 foot easement,
nor do we plan to give 10 feet of our property for the purpose of road construction
in conjunction with this development.
Mr, and Mrs. Howard "Bud" Watkins
e - a 6'
No
Address
- - ~ .
Dated
0
` C.4VEAT LMP'TOR I!i SPOXAYE COUNTY - SGiNtE LASE HISTORIES
PAIVZ'F'D HILIS SUBDIVISION (EXHIBIT A)
First Additioa was approved for septic ta*zks even though subdivision is situated
on a hills ide and s ome Las ements were jackha:,mered ou t of s olid rock.
FHa required 3test holes in eac'n dra.infield site to be inspected wnd approved.
S-wao° sur`'aced soon af-iCzr occu-mncy and ran down slopes and roa.ds. -
They decided tha.t soil 'Uests, done b3r devaloper, w°ren't representative in alI cases.
' Second Addition Kasn°t 3apyoved until a Ia.goon was built ~o ha.ndl- sewage.
Construc tion pczceded approval and hottom of lagoon wasn't sQaZed, '
Raw sewage pilir.g up at inlei vige as water percola `es rapidly into ground, _
Develoger is contac i'-ed numerous ii:r.es but no irnprove-ment.
P:asidan~s leave faucets running and a boy adds water, every so often, with a ga.rden
hose. • To the present, there is stii 1. no rzsponsible public entity and,afte= viewing the
lagoon, no
I -LL. is still not clear w'r.e luher St. Healtn approved the drinkirg wa. ter system pri or
to cons -1C.r~ction. -
h i th increased b owth of the sulxi3vision, the water supply soon teca:ne inadequate.
D-iring one oi our driesz sw~nmers, water was first ra,tionsd, tnen~ltrucked up the hill
to z"ill the holdi-,L3 tank. I Lwas finallf cut completely off xhile a larger pump was
insta 13.ed.
Resi3ents had no firs- protection during tnis dan;erous dry periad.
The winter, with -25° temFeratures, brougnt- a. nex set of problerns.
Tne same watzr tznx (that went dry in the swmmsr) noW iroze and water sexr-vice was
a;aia ojf. This resulted in hurned out hzatin.g elemenis, no fi.re protection and a.
va-rizty of other problems, i
A heating element h.as sincs been added to the tank to prevent freeze-7ags, •
We were told Ilrat the desian of the t,ank was ba.sed on av8rage wi.nter temperatu.res.
-
iiILLVIEW ESTA1"IES (EXHIBIT B)
App_."oved Juiy 32, ' 9?0 for 233 lots, apts, and a shoppira certer. l0o acres.
Dier objsctior_s of develoLen ( aa.scetta and Guthrie) tha local healih Dist. insisted
upon a paclmga trsatnert plant.
Develoters eould noi fi nd a public sntity who would accept rl&o and the Countf ErZineers
said it wouid be about a year before they Woul-d begin orera.ting such iacil.iti zs.
Ecolog,r ~nsisted on a pu'c~7.ic entity but Trf;~P, VAra and Inlat~d Po•.rer and Libh~ st~ 11
refusea. - I
After much p?-essure, ths Health Dist, reversed its earlier position and said septic
tanks would be allowahle. They ac tfuually h.a3 no regula -Itions to requirz seweraga "
systzms or adequat.z fire protection and it was conmon knoxledoe amono, the buildsrs.
Dr. Plc,pger made ons las 'L. appeal to them as responsible ciLizeas zo continua efforts
~o procure an operatirg en -1t6.i -Cy i or the system. .
FHa r.o1a insisted tha.t the puhlic p3ant, was economica,lly ieasibls ar.d in the best
intzrests of the community and thzy rezused to insure unless or.e was provid°d.
lhis ada:nant attitude broks the imFassa and the Coun+..y a.jreed to take resDonsibility
-f'ox r.&o.
Accordin.v ~o the soil survey oi the entire Dlat mast of the acre~.ge T~ras accepta.ble
i or dra~ni~eld5 except the sou-Ln-ast se-tion. T'r_at area had a sev2re 'o mcderate .
-rating., was the lcwest sec tion , a natu?a.l drair.agexa.y and had no outl2t in case of
floodirz,
,ieedi ess to say you knola wharQ the tzeatment plan L was instal3e-d'. The first oocd
chj raok will inundaie th.- plant and ra:r sewage wil? -Clow into the hcmes of thcsz
unsus -pec ting 'ouyers.
To m.3kQ na tters wo?-set the developers are presently T illing the pntire goti -i-heast
corraer, f or the shoppino centzr, 'Ghere Cf f illina in p~.czically the en tire r~.tu_► a1 .
draina.?,-Q basin of an are3 xith a history ot' floodinj.
Tnflxre is no recor3 oA St. H2alth ever app?"ovin~ ~hz clrink? ng water suppay.
Fiie protuee-tion for the antire plat aprears to be one hfdrant.
s
EXCERPTS FROM "URi3AN PLANNING ASPLCTS 0F WATER POLLUTIOY COiv"rROL"
•BY ;ttRD GRAvA 1969 '
PACKAU:-, TREATMr,VT PL.AiNTS 1. Develoved and marketed in the 19506s,
2. Usua.lly overdasign°d and require heavy poxzr consumption.
3. Can't conpa.re in en'insaring efficiency uith standard pla.nts uader continuous
control.
4. A 50 house devslopment (or even 25, if homes are expensive) is large er_ough
, to support economically apaekage tzeatment plant.
5. Capacities and types must bZ selected carefully, require regular ir,spection
and mainten3.nce, nust be screened and fenced.
6. The plants are vulnsrable to shock loadings (sharp increase in flo:+ volu,:ies)
uhich raay cause a large quantity discharge of solids in the effluent. Necnanical
faiiures can h3ve the same result.
Possible safety precautions against pl.ant upsets are: final sand filtration,
duplication of vital equipment and buffer striFs o' 500 feet.
8. Soms salvage valu3 whsre septic tanlcs are a total loss,
9. Don't demand a large municipal extenditure Nhen revenue basa has not develoFed.
10. A precise rraster vlan is indispensable in order to consolidate all Facxage plants
into a singla systam in the future.
EiCCERP'TS FROM "SMr1LL SE'dAGE TREATM :DJT SYSTEMS"
BY NATI0NAL ASSOCIATIOV OF HCME' BUILDERS RESEARCH IItiSTITUTE
1. To be acceptable to FHA and VA a community system must cemply xsth all state and
local laws and rejulations and be approved by the health authorities. Permanent
maintenance and continuous use and ogeration must also be assured.
2. Of the 12 state health dspts. visited, in the study, all were of the opinion th3t
the opexation and main-tenance of community ssxerags systems are more satisfactory
when under the control of some governrnental agency. This kind of govarr~nental
organization is mandatory in ? of, the 12 states visited.
3. The cost of septic tank systerns varies from about $150 to $700 per house.
4. ;•iost dom-stic seua.ge sta'oilization ponds (lagoons) in the U.S. are designed on
the ba.sis of 30 to 60 houses ger acre of pond surface area.
5. Develo-cers shvuld retain a consulting sanitar,y erQinezring firn to supply the
technica.l advica necessary for the project design. 14ajor prohlems that :+ill
confront the engineer include relating the possi ole growth rate of tha projact
or the rate at which the homes will be s old to the design o-f the sewerage faciliti.-s
so that i ~ will funetion satisfactorily and econo:nically at each stage of the
subdivision develop:nent.
6. Ths FHA has its own form of trust deed whare the system is to be owna3 Uy a private
corporation for profit. It also ha.s special provisions for the cnarter of a property
owners' association.
DOUBLE STA`tDAR.17 IN PROPOSi,D SPOKAYr COUNTY WASTF.TaAII'GR DISPG: r1L POLICY (T'r{IS 'JA5
REJECT~D BY THE BOARD A►1D PR-SENT REGS. WERSE ADOP'IED)
PUBLIC SE'rJERA"SE SYS LMS SINGI,J 0'PTNER SE'dERAGE SYST'EMS
1.Prelimina.ry p13ns must be dons tsy a 1. Prelimina.ry plans may be dons under supsr-
licensed en~ineer. vision of an engineer.
2. Raquire a public m&o entity. 2. An individual or corporation may m&o.
3, rlo nultiple hookups allowed. 3. Soma multiple hook.cps allowed. •
4, iVo wet wells* for pu:npino stations. 4. May use xet wells* for pu:nping stations.
5. All nrelin. plans go to state 5. Sons prelim. plans go to state aoencies
affancies for approval, for approval.
6. Shall make tests and keap records 6. No nention of testirg or record-keepino.
necessary for proper operation.
7. Require easements or right-of-Nay No easemant or right-of-H3y required for
for collectors and laterals. collectors and laterais.
~ In wet uells, pumps are submsrged in seKage presenting h°alth an3 m3inte:~nc
pro'~lems for those responsible for re~.irs. y
'vro
q_ ~g_ -79
• ° ~ ' . h~- • '
,
. . 1 ~ . ~y
, ♦ ~
z_;; e Q ~ , .
, ~ " °-New schools ace needed in 1ndividual to handle public Finally, the group 8eca~n- +
~ the Centr4i Valley district in • relstions iqll time was another mended a high achool be built
• . , the very near future, the recommendation . east of 8arker Rd. by 1982 to
' • dlstriM's long-range planning "Establish a plan to speed relieve the two preseilt high
~mn~ittee, reported to the ~ the ~ocess of comple~ng 'schools and accomanodate
board of directors last week. buildings In Yhis District," was expected growth in the ~ •
`-In fac4, ' the committee stW another recommendation. eastern part of the dfstcict. J, " •
_ • • • ~eeommended a nearly $ii "Egamples may be to use the Sites proposed were gor the . ,
. , • - million bond issue be sub- same pflans of previous Uberty Lake area for both an b,
. imitted to raise the money for schools, or use sosne og 4Tie elesnentary and a jwaior high; ,
itew buildings and additional ~e archi4ects who have the Saltese area, either east of 1 ~
sites to keep up with growth. b2en through the planriing CDnkklin between 16tti and ~
,
Zhree elementary schools, one pr°cess•19 32nd, or south of 32nd in the
'Junior high and one seflior The commtttee also Ianke Rd. area; enlargement ° .
ldgh we~e among the com- ~~~ended closer coopgra- ~ the present BaY°S~er and ~
~ • . fnittee's recommendations, ~oo with the county Park Mission elemen~ry site, and a ~
. `"~11 ~o be in use by 19~2. Dep$rtHnent. char~ge in des~nation of the
A Building recpmmendations sIte at 44th and Bates from •
' '.'Additronally, the com• were for an elementary school jutior high to elementary. ' k
`tnittee, which was formed in at 24th ana Adams q.o relleve 7I"he comrriittee also°-~ ~
IJanuarY, recommetided th$t overcrowding at Adams, recommended that propetty ,
oantiing for the district be on 'school, ait elementary school located at 32nd and Pines,
A continual basis. "Plat~ning in the Lihertg► I.ake ar~ a,nd previously pcaa~chass~ for ~
dioWd always be ahead off the an elementaY°y school where Idgh schoot, be redesignated •
• ' bond is,sue apprnval if 4~e needed, either at I,iberty Lake for a jwnior high andpossibly
° • need is evident. (This shQUld er Yn the Ponderosa area_ seragped fmr ➢and closer to
_ include ae°chitectiiral and ~~corn_ 43rd $nd pines, A high achool
' parent-community com- mended a junior high for the sit,e east of Barker Rd. tfl
• - • iinittees)," the report stated. Chester-Ponderosa s~rea, accommodate the recom-• _
AI.90~ _ RECOMMENDED 1ocaQed ~t about 43a^d and mended building also is pra
-was employment of a fulltime PineE i# a land swap being pra~ pased. f8cility planning and develop- posed couIld 6e accornplished. ~p AC~OMPLI9~i all . of
: uient person to keep track of Also suggestes~ was a cl~ ~~lus some oti~e~ prn jects
new housing deeelopments° watch on the YAbertg► L~ake as , well, the commi~tee
' •~wft~hin Central Valley and glve $res to see if a junior h~h will reco~nendet~ a local M~lding
• r" ~ , general recommendations. An ~ be neetled there• . bond issue of %0,932,593 be
• , . ~ . ~ suhmitted soon to G'N voters. ' o
• . ~ , _ ~ _ ..r - _ ' " ~
State building snafching
' . . . " . : ~ . rrroney was prnjected to raiae '
sm additidraal $15,081,417 for a • .
totsl of $25,994,010.
. J ~ Of the totafl amount,
$13,907,101 was pro jected to be
spent an new sr,hoog oon-
. • . • - a ; 'a i ' ' , - ' ~ struction. Another $800,000 •
. . ~ , . ~ ~ was to go for acqufsition sites, ,
to be added to $400,000 from ,
, ' ~ • , ~ ' '
. the ~st CV bond issue desig
~ - , ,
' r, ~ / r t ~ ' ' . . • ~ 21Ated fOT Sit(°, IICQIIIiSitiOI1.,
ADso anticipated was ~
• ~ g ~ . • , $1,887,000 for prmjec8s at : ° -
! eaisting schools. These were ~ • . .
` . ` ' , • . 'listed as levellng of playflelds,
landacapir4g, drainage, etc., h
iI1C111ditig CV anii UEfiVBraity . ' ~ . n
, ' • h • . , . . ~ ' ' . , . . , , • hfgh; parking and black- n, .
' ' ~ • ' r' l` , tOPp1ng; sprinklers attd irri-
- ~ • ' . , ` . ' ' r
• , ~ tr . ~ , ~ Y, . . Y • gation; fencing; classroom
llghting pnd accousticel wark, • ~
and e transpurtation cent.er
and werehouse for the distrlct.
. , ; • .
The committee members ,
. • , ~ = ;.~~~F : ' . _ , a , was chaired by Joyce, Gorder _ _ _ _ " C' . . . ; ; • ' ,l ` ' , ~ _ , . . and consisted of Dorothy ! - .
. - • t _ , -,~eged,- Chuck ~iorris, ~bert . .
~Ilontle, Phyllis Ianb, Clyde
Haase, Grace Rawlings
w ~ . . 1 • ~ ~ ~ , ' f ,
~F • : eM r ~ ~ ~ , • gAsan `MtiTt➢Ia„ P@te P1'e8t8 w
and t3r. George Schneider.,
• , i ' ~ ~ - - - = -
No Sewer HoQkmup
H es Sold , _ •
i- • • .
iAdd.
. f
. Lawauit$ directed at hie Wat tank and remove It fpr the Spokane County Coni- ~
Midilome Addltion sewage treatment. missioners and the oounty
treatment plant aren't John Kirkland, Wadte Water health distrirt, clsiming thsy ~
. preventSng developer Robert Servicesowner,is not licepsed violated provlsione of the ~
•Tomlinson from selling homes to pei'farm this sort of service State Environmental Policy ;
Jn the 160,acre subdividon at and does" not own a sewage Act and the county health code t
• 32nd and Bowdish. pumping truck. when they approved the plant. '
' - : Although Tomlinson has not Pickett, however, says bts Honlcan ia maintaining that f
ponnected any hames tp his department has di'rected oonbenttetion of the enUre
=100,000 package treaEtpent KirWand to obtain a license developmept's effluent in one ~
plar►t, the sublect of two` froui them before he pumps drelnfteld at the pactage ,
lawsuits. he already has, aold 4ny wet tanks in the Midilome plant ie a more serfous threat '
' at least three homes ' in the Additioa. He explained that to the quality of, aquifec's
subdivisian apd one already fn the wet tank has a capacity to weter than individual septic
occupied. , . •hold several weeks worth of tanks at►d drala-fields.
~7he occupants, accordltYg to r taw sewage before needing to Tomlinson aays the suits '
Ed Pickett ' of the epvimn• be pumPed• don't affect his right ta seU
mental health section `of the '7'be residents' of the han~ -homes fn the eubdivisim and
oounty health district; are bave lived there only toVo that he will guarantee
#tushing raw sewage intq a wet weeks, so Pickett predictted adequate sewage disposal for
tank at the site. , that it will be two wee~s each home he sells tt►ere. T
beDEVELOPER Tp~t.~i~ •fore Klrkland will bave to "I'm not going to accept a'
. 60N who also is selling~ haine~ ~p thO tank. `moratorium or iniunctfan in
` in the aubdivisfon, said he'ha~ ~ BAID Kirkland aaeured whatevqr forrn without a bond
cantcacted wlth W~ste ~Wate~ ~ he ow~ns a partable p~p from Mra. ' Honican," ~
8ervlces to puinp $ewage ~rq~-,~ ~4 ~k at can be at#acl~ed Tqmlinson ~id. Such bond is ,
, to hia trucks to.pump sewage, usually required to insure 4he
• snd that he will obtain a developer against bsses when ;
" llcense before pumping. ' an In junction is reguested. • w
' In pe meantime, Tomlinson! NO RVJUNCTIQN hae been is continuing to sell hotnes in bmu~, despite the court's
the coritroversial subdiviaion. cUrectton to'the DOE in regard ,
' Home-owner .Idan Honlcan, to the plant, aocording to the
, 59904 Bowdlah, who tlled the aounty's chief civll dePutY,
suitg against Toxnlinson and Jerry Neal. '
tiwo government agencies in Neal Will represent the
o.onnectfon with the package county cammteaioners when
treatment plant, has received Honican'a auit agalnet them
aru11ng in her fayor in one of oomea to hearing. r
those auits. Counsel said the- developer
'Ilie Department of Ecology legally is entitled to sell homes
(D4E) was told by the Cpu,rts in a eubdivision as soon as the
tbat it muat review plans for county connrlnlsslonera sign
the plant and issue the proper the $nal plat for the project,
approval before the plant may an action t6at follows at least
be put into operation. one publtc hearing.
`'ANOTHER 9UIT of fiornlinson said he wiU not
Honiesn's is directed against leaye purchasers in the lurch
for sewage dlsposel.
NOTIINQ TELA►T hi$ plat
originally waq apprnved for
individual septic tanks and
drainfieldd, Tomlinson sald he
Z , will install them at no eatra
oost to the' purchaser shouldti
the treatment plant not be
allowed to operate.
NEAL SAID Tomlituson will'
have to apP1Y (r afl ametrtd-
~f ine~nt ,tA. •hWLIcauTeatly ' ap-
~proved plan before he legally
i.'a0 tnstall eny- indiv14=1
septic tanks.
,•'a
. r
r "
SepteaDer 28. 1978
• T0: 3POKANE COUNT7 PLAN CCMMIS3ION
FRCIK t JQAN HOIdICAN
REt MIDILGKE FIRST ADDITION HEARING
t
EXCERPT3 FRCX 3TATE PNYIROIiMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA)
wAC 197-10-360 It should also be reaewbered t~t propoule designed to iaprc~re
ttte environeant ~auch aa seKage treataent planta ar pollutian control requirements)
may also have adverae emironmental impacta.
WAC 197-10-~60 (4) AdditionAl reaearch or field ievestigationa by either the lead
agency or by the pacivate applicant is required Nhen the infoznation available to
the lead agency le not sufficient for it to aake a determination of the potential
adverao envirorumental inpacta.
EXCERPT3 FR(H FIPUIL MIDILOlE EI3
Pg. 181 - In the vicinity of the projeot eite the depth to the xater table rangee
fram about 70 to 90 feet belox the land surface.
The paroject eite ie located near the aargin of the aquifar aonth of Opportunity.
The aquifer ie thinner and hae a loxer trarusaiseivity in thie area than in the
main body of the aquifer to the north. The eeaeanal fluctuations of the xater table
and the relatively higb aalt content of the xater in thia area has lead to the
paesibility that thare ie very littla floi+ of groundMater in this area. While it
isnot anticipated that the pacoposed project xill have any perceptible inpact on the
geolagy ar hydrolagy of the aquifer, the existing hydrolagy of the aquifer near the
project aite make it nare eusceptible to potential xater qvality degradation Praa
project related etfluente.
_E& 289_- Prelisirisry data aleo in8lcates that aaae areaa near the margin of the
aquiferg and the pro,iect aite in pdrticular, have higher aalt concentrationg than
does the sain body of the aquifer. Because of the lower flow ratea and lack of
sixing near the aargin the effect of aurface recharge on graund xater quality say
be sare eaaily identified. The higher aalt concentratione near the aargin may be
the result cif surtsoe rnnatf froa the uijoinirig hille and/or eurtace recharge frca
the area abave the sqn,ifsr,
g& 191 - Becauae at the locatioa of thm paroject aite cyver a portioa of the aquifer
rhere flaw ratee are preaused to be low the potential impdct oa ground Kater quality
frva pocoject related effluenta may be ■core aignificantg ad the percolate Nauld noZ
be ■ixed and diluted to the extent that it would be in the main body of the squifer.
ES. 203 - The preliainary "208" data resnlta indicate that the aquifer way be
relatively etagnsnt in the vicinity of the projeat aite and that pollutanta that
reach the graundxater in this area are cnly pdrtially fluehed out.
Pg. 208 - At any peucticular eite it appears that the atratification of pollutants
ia eeaeonal in nature indieating that recharge to the aquifer in theae areas xcura
aeasonally. ThiB dats aupporte the concluaion that the ground-xater ia recharged
by aurtace and eub-aurtmce effluenta discharged aver the aquifer.
Pg. 209 - Because of the hydrology of the aquiter in the vicinity of the project site
it is probable that leae mixing and dilution occura in this area than in the main
body of the aquifer. The effect of project ralated effluente on groundxater quality
could be acaca signifiaant in the vicinity of the project site than in the sain body
of the a.quifer.
It can be expected that eurface rater runoff fraR the project eite Mill eontain
ainor aaounta of eane ground xater contaBinaAte.
. ,
s
211 - The parelisinary resulte of the "208" etudy indicate that the hydrolo,gy
' of this area is very cawplex and that the direction af flox varys seaeonally. There
are several KellB locsted in close proxiaity to the project aite and the proposed
s drainfield location. BecauBe of the proxiaity of these xells and the atagnant flow
conditiona that are indicated in thie area the poseibilit,y of sane significant
locali$ed impect on groundxater quality cannot be ruled out.
.Es, 213 - The possibility that sone drainfield or surface water effluent Kill reach
the water table arfd carry saaie contaeinanta to the groundwater cannot be ruled out.
The extent or magnitude of this conta,aaination is unknarrn at this tiae and is the
sub3ect of several on-going studies. The pacopoaed project provides the flexibility
to neet future xaste water treatment needa as they arise.
A. 218 - M ost of the nitrogen in the traditional aeptic tank effluenta ia present
as ammoniue. Activated aludge-extended aeration syste' effluents, on the other
hand, contain prinarily nitrate.
fg. 219 - Although little information appears to be available on the efficiency of
theae eechaniems, it ia probable that they are only partially effective in reducing
drainfield nitrogen. This is apparent fcr a couple of reaeons. First, drainfield
effluenta arq injected 14" to 36" belax the soil surface. This placee thee out of
the most biolagically active aoil horizon, the top soil. Secondly, and probably most
leportantly, drainfield applications are not carefully controlled and optimal con-
ditions for denitrification are not naintained.
Because of their size, viruees are generally transparted to a greater depth than
tacteria. Becauee the depth to the water table is greater than 100 feet in most of
the aquifer, and in exceas of 60 feet in the area of the pro3ect site, penetration
of bacteria and viruaes to the water t,able ia unlikely.
Eg, 220 - The potential far groundxater contanination could also be reduced or
eliminated through the use of an evaporative lagoon. Evaporative lagoons require
large land space and do not operate efficiently in the Spokane clieate. Past
experience Kith such aystens in Spokane County hse been largely poor. Probleme
xith cdoace and overflowing from poor design have been significant.
The drainfield should be located to avoid areas where the water table is shallox,
slopea are eteep or soil permeability is excessively high or la+.
.Eg, 221 - The possibility that some Maste water treatment system effluent Kill
percolate to ttte water table and carry contaminants to the ground water cannot be
precluded. The proposed Maste water treatment agaten, hoxever, provides the flex-
ibility to meet future waate water treatment needs ae they arise.
le
~hdru
-1 / t 'c`-'
Newm~n M., ~
. ~ ~ laMe ~ 1ZHayden laMe
&4-7
iFoe- ur
k Alent
-r r
r laka
♦SLibert ~ Cotur
`v LaMe d'Atene
Spokvne Aquifer Study
11.811 letlerson SpoMane, Weshingtoa 99260 (509)456•3600
August 31, 1978
Mr. and Mrs. Frank Gerimonte
S. 11617 Dishman Mica Road
Rt. 7
Spokane, WA 99206
Dear Mr. and h1rs. Gerimonte:
Thank you for allowing samples of your well water to be collected and
analyzed as a part of the Spokane County Aquifer Study ('208' Project)O
I have listed below the results of the analyses done in our field lab.
These analyses are accomplished by utilizing methods which are considered M
as non-standard by the American Public Health Association, the American Water
Work Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. Because of this
the data cannot be deemed as accurate as it might be if standard methods were
usedo However, throughout the course of the '208' Project we have compared
the results of our testing with those of other laboratories and have found
them to be acceptableo '
.
Date of Sampl e t,! ,3- 78 f3 /-7- 79
~ Chlorides 3•'1 ,Q 7S ~ ,Q
' Hardness (as CaC03) f88 ~,e 2~(~
Ni trates (IUO3-N)
d7~~
f'
Temperature °C ' j°
~ Specific Conductance,/'tmhos/cm .304 t~,5 Cj
.
' Once again, thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
R
a 8 _ 7 h'
9
Robert J. McCann
Research Techni cian
~ -
' ! .
-
A~
o►
B0AItD OI' COUIJTY C0I,11ISSIONERS OF SPOKIIFE COtD1TYLWA2IINGT(7N
' F71lDIIJG i AND OFiDFrR IN TtUE rU1TTF.R OF T'tEE TEfftEiHOLD DETL'1NII:NATIOtJ CdNCIIt?II13t} TfiE
PRELII•IDJARY PLJ1T J1ND ZONE RLCLASSIFICIISIClN, PE-1053-76, GUTfIRIE' S VALLEYVIEW
~ Bt,h ADbITICrN AND PE- 1086-77 , GU'1'f-iRIE' S V'ALL.EY VIEW 10th ADDITICBV, NOW COM8I17F.D
AND REFEtRED TO AS PE-1086-77, MALIAX' S ADDITICQJ; ZE-132-76 AND ZE-46-77, BO`IH
AGHICULIURAL TO SINGLE FIaNffLY RESIDENTIAL.
WHEREAS, rtrs. Frank Gerimonte, did by letters dated March 30, 1978 Qnd
April 7, 197E3, request a special public iiearing before the Board of County
Corraniesionere for the purpose of presenting evidence asid testimony against the
Board' e iaeuanoe of a proposed declaration o-I non--significance with regard to
the change of condition for Malloy's Addition to fill an area for approximately
62 home9, creating an 11 acre barrow sump and perrnitting septic tanka rather
t}ian a sewage collection system; and~
W'HEREAS, the Planning Director did advise the Board of County Commiseioners
jy memorandum dated April 17, 1978 to schedule a hearing for ttie reconeider-
ing of the proposed declaration of non-siqnificance, and consequently the plat
proposal itself; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commiseioner did hold a public hearing on
the reconsideration of the proposed declaration of non-gignificance and to take
testimony oP the plat sponsor, objectore, and ot,her interested parties; and,
WHEREAS, at eaid hearing opportunity wae afforded those favoring and
those opposipg the above described proposed declaration of non-significance
and change of condition to the preliminary plat and zone change, the Board of
County Corrmissionere of 3pokane County havina fully considered tlle teetimony
Qiven, the records and minutes of the Planning Cordni9sion, the Planning Uepart-
ment staff's recomended oonditions to which tlie chAnge of conditions for
Mal.•loy's Addition would be sub,ject, the environmental review, and all other
evidence presented, and furt,her having previously personally acquainted them-
selves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find th$t suf'ficent
data was preaented to raiee eerious queetions wit,h regard to the project's
impact on the physical enviroiVnent particularly in light of the recent Aepellate
and Supreme Court environrnental decisions.
NOW, THL'FtEFORE, t,he Board of County Coarniesioners does conolude that a
declaration of aignificance should be and hereby ie iesued by the Chairrnan for
the preliminary plat lnowm ae Malloy'e Addition, PE-1o86-77 and zone reclass-
ification to Single Family Residential; and any and all previously iseued pro-
ased or final nesative t,hreshold determinations are hereby rescinded.
9-~g-`7
g
/
/
~
~
FURTNERMORE, the subject plat is to be remanded to the Planning Conunission
for a public hearing with a final Environinental Impact Statement, at such time as
,
~ one becomes available, and after legal notification of the hearing as per standard
Planning Department procedures for a proposed preliminary plat.
~
DATED THIS DAY 0F 1978.
%
r
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, w'ASNINGiON
"
e.. -
~
ATTEST:
VERNON W. ONLAND
C f Boar
1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ hdru
Newman
1 ~
iNayden laMe
R' ~ ~ ' • iFoeur
A lene
_ r
take
Libert ~ Cotur
LaMe d'Alent
Spokane Aquifer Study
, N. 811 leilerson 'Spokane, Mleshington 99160 (509) 456-3600
August 31, 1978
d Mr, and Mrs. Frank Gerimonte
S. 11617 Dishman Mica Road
Rt. 7 Spokane, WA 99206 ,
Dear Mr, and Mrs. Gerimonte:
Thank you for allowing samples of your well water to be collected and
analyzed as a part of the Spokane County Aquifer Study (1208' Project)o
I have listed below the results of the analyses done in our field lab.
' These analyses are accomplished by utiliring methods which are considered ~
as non-standard by the American Public Health Association, the American Water
Work Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation. Because of this
the,data cannot be deemed as accurate as it might be if standard methods were
usedo Nowever, throughout the course of the 1208' Project we have compared
the results of our testing with those of other laboratories and have found . them to be acceptable.
.
Date of Sample , q-3- 79 R_17-79
Chlorides 3.02 ,,,,,,~,.~Q 7S m~~ ,
Hardness (as CaC03) V,,e 22~ ~ Y/I
Ni trates (N03-PI) ~ ~
~ n~ ~
Temperature OC q° c
/3
Specific Conductance/'tmhos/cm
Once again, thanlc you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
~
Robert J. McCann
Research Technician
. .
r~:-4 - . . _ _ ;YAtfi ~ ~nln•
, e ~ ~ !
rI 1e 6
_ ~ ° Z / ~ ► r_ ,rdru
Newman
~ r L~ke 1 y
IHayden lake
1
~ k
~~oeur
0 Aleaee
lake
~Slirert ~ Cotur
`V'LiMe d'Alene
Spokane 14quifer Study
N. 611 letterson Spokaae, Weshinlton 99160 (509)156• 3600
August 31, 1978
Mr. and Mrs. Frank Gerimonte
S. 11617 Dishman Mica Road
Rt. 7 •
Spokane, WA 99206 ,
Dear P1r, and P1rs. Gerimonte:
Thank you for allowing samples of your well water to be collected and
analyzed as a part of the Spokane County Aquifer Study ('208' Project)o
I have listed below the results of the analyses done in our field lab.
These analyses are accomplished by utilizing methods which are considered M
as non-standard by the American Public Health Association, the American Water
Work Association and the Water Poilution Control Federation. Because of this
the data cannot be deemed as accurate as it might be if standard methods were
usedo However, throughout the course of the '208' Project we have compared
the results of our testing with those of other laboratories and have found
them to be acceptableo
Date of Sample 41-3--78 R-47r79
Chl ori des 3, Z~,_f,~ 7 tJ,4
Hardness (as CaC03) 22~
0
Ni trates (N03-PJ)
Temperature °C
a
Specific Conductance/'tmhos/cm 3~'~ i,~,5 d Q
Once again, thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
. .
Robert J. McCann
Research Techni ci an ~ ~ ~ ~
, .
• kill l.f~ ~ r+ n 1' T~V 1♦ !~\iD ~ ~ . ry • ~J_.. V J V.✓._~l
TiS.~ 0. ~~T:~TT~:r ~L.~ TS GGO~i~ i-I~i L~~~TG`I _+D/C_R
?N; 4, F:;CM S?OtkN: CCUNT`f 1j.~A-1,7111H DTST.
:'ai :Iey GerBr? 'rias Yy ~,l ~ T::a1eqL:2.cz d;;sign a::d roC?'
:j^? ~~-:•~a~ x oD small a:d sane roor op-a-zaL? ono
~1:~?V~TS~.i.~f ~`i.'...Ly - lO7 G:1?.i? r iJJ?'
y.~ ~ lL' ^ 1
J CVl~ Jv- O1f ' V.~ OD J11~~
.^>u'r"~- -p?'C' i ;.`s13 dll- tO _l i.:rtLa'~i02'27 pt70r O'" ''`ar"1,
./.~..~u
i~.l.;?I"~3 l3'.{c~ UZ.~l_~Z.Ej ^ 'iOv 5a~i 376- : v0ry ZS fa?' c^. i G't.°ai:c3-;I y3Zd 0-zratiOtl.
t~o:~ 7TJ ~ 2 n no,r ~ OJ ~er ~2(~O co_. ~ .~i,•e~+t•~r.
r-zvocd L3
~..~~a. ~d io= j0 ~..,.~as a:~3 . A. J.. ~
.i ? z., a ~~e~.:~'- T~oon - L:'I o^ L 0p-2G3 O7 ~~.t7'1 02'! ~.1..`~..C1. ~..~►.0:231 l ~~..:1~ I''_~°d?C~ fQ.~ in Q+~21
v.Z a~....^.1j -11 O11 .
"CJ~ 1 a~ :T~~Q7:1 - SC+,1a '`i,_'O~.Cle t~1 LCl x,.L_.+lic~ ~-0:1 O~ StliCz.?:1:. pay`~,2'.a ~i v^'_^.,,
~..~ict^d S?zila=i ta:1 ,NLl:7sing iiC?1° - a~'itifTie i..:CCl2rJlt? 'oiZ't,'1 Op$=3ti Cn•
Hi 1"a TnJObn 7nZC2qi:a-6e ?l? i:li?2;331C8.
CiZ.:lJ P2.ik C0n:11t2:ti +f 7i.~ Ct3?'.i{ TJ~, ti1 5~'N3oa 5~ ..^.~.i ~T.
Gc-nti :en:,~.' Ci;,y T--voon - ~.3 oper-ailon,
~1cha Su r' ivis ion - Cdo?- -D3.ant.
•0r 4h S ~a:~ a: t .7Ls~~ clos°d, by ~:~a~ .h D - s~ , C~~er ~Ct7 ~~e:~e ca'? s T-~e:t a? Ln i Lai? ed,
ria:• su-j.-Josed -to ba, desi~rad to ra►~~.a a..ll s1L~3e in Cc::nY.r,
32 ri; i1 ion per yeaz, cluanvi ;.i zs o-;~' sznd rr_n cass-pcolso
- hTa cr s cre~ n~ and p? a~~ t •.~as o~~s.~? .zwed.
'Pli.:1S w??1 L'L-~.1r'JL'3h de'J ts. anGi. I'k. las ted OI1Zy c3 Iti?-g i 10?1i}i3 *
!:j Jo.` T)I'4b!2:i!s are as fQlIo-gS 'T'O'J Sii1al1~L::t7.°~ O-r OV°ibUil:}
2e linoua.li: ied oper-atOrs
3. Owr.zr dczsr.".; wa.n'L. ta p-y ccst cz" ±rop-_ c^ ~ri ~~oz
, 4.
50 1.10 O;?-s:.Ltti 1i13peCtlO^S OT 3J1i arna!YSI3
(
r
P,r~ ►7 .
BoARD or cocnTrf coPII`tIJ3IONL'~J OF SPOKANE COtD1TY. WAS}IINGT'OT1
FJ.IJDIIIG~ AND ORDF:M IN TITf: AtAT'I'F:R OF TtiE TffftE:;'iHOLD DETO IINATION CONCIIZI'JING TIiE
PRELIUDJARY PLI1T AND ZONE RECLASSIFICIITIClN, PE- 1053-76, GU'n[RIE' S VALLEYVIEW
Bt,h ADDITION AND PE-lo86-77, GU'I'I-{RIE'S VfLLEY VIEW 10th ADDITICN, NOW COrB-D1E.D
AI-)D REFF.RRFD TO 11S PE-1086-779 MALLOY' S ADDITIClN; ZE-132-76 AND ZE-46-77, B0rB-i
AGFIICUL7TRAL TO SINGLE k'AAMILY RESIDL.TITTAL.
WHEREA.S, 1-Irs. Frank Gerimonte, did bS• letters dated 14arch 30, 1978 and
April 7, 197E3, request a special public tiearing before t,he Board of County
Corrgniesionere for the purpose of presenting evidence arid testimor~y against the
Board'e ieeuanoe of a proposed declaration of non-significance with regard to
the change of condition for Malloy's Addition to fill an area for approximately
62 homes, creating an 11 acre barrow sump and permitting Beptic tanka rather
ttlan a sewage collection system; and,
WMZEAS, the Planning Director did advise the Board of County Commieeioners
by memorandum dated April 17, 1978 to schedule a hearing for ttie reconsider-
ing of the proposed declaration of non-aignificance, and consequently the plat
• proposal itself; and,
W}-EREA.S, the Board of County CocrYniseioner did hold a publie hearing on
the reconsideration of t,he propoeed declaration of non-eignificance and to take
testimony of the plat eponsor, ob,jectora, and other intereeted partiee; and,
WHEftEAS, Qt eaid hearing opportunity wae afforded those favoring and
those opposi.pg the above described proposed declaration of non-significance
mnd change of eondition to the preliminary plat and zone change' the Board of
County Comrnissionera of "3pokane County havinQ fully considered the teetimony
given, the records and minutes of the Planning Coranission, the Planning Depart-
ment staff's recorrmended oonditions to whicr, +lie change of conditions for
P•Saloloy's /lddition would be sub,ject, the environmental review, and all other
evidence presented, and further having previoualy personally acquainted them-
selves with the site and vicinity in queation, does hereby find that sufficent
data was preaented to raise aerious queetions with regard to the project's
impact on the physical envirorunent particularly in light of the recent Atipellate
and Supreme Court environrnent4l decisions. ,
NOW9 THEtEFOIZE, the E3oard of County Comniesioners does conalude that a
declaration of eignifica.nce should be and hereby ie iesued by the Chuirrna.n for
the prelicninary plat known ae Malloy'e Addi+ion, PE-lo86--77 and zone reclas9-
ification to Single Family Residential; and any and all previously iseued pro-
posed or final negative threshold deterrn.inations are hereby reecinded.
.
~
/
/ FURTNERh10RE the sub 'ect 1 at i s to be rernand
~ J p ed to the Pl anning Conuniss i on
for a public hearing with a final Environinental Impact Statement, at such time as
one becomes available, and after legal notification of the hearing as per standard z -
Planning Department procedures for a pi•oposed pr-eliminary plat.
DATED THIS DAY OF 1978,
" - /
r
BOARD OF COUP•JTY COMMI SS IONERS
- OF SPOKANE COUNT~' , WASH I NG i^ON
: r ! .
~
ATTEST:
VERNON W. OHLAND
C f Boar
,
' ~ {
!
BEFORE THE PLANIv'ING CCMNUSSICN OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
, . )
f~ )
) NOTICE
/3- 78 ) OF
CONTINUANCE
~
~ •
)
The above entttled matter coming on regularly for heartng before the Planning
Commisston of Spokane Cownty, V1Ta shlnqton, and the Commission betng
destrous of glving sald matter futher consideratlon dld determtne to
continue this hearing to
;2-9 , 1978 /o.'oo
DATED AT SPCKANE THIS c,?DAY OF , 1975.
- TED NfC' COURY'y CHAIRIVIAN
►
By: Fred L. Dayharsh
Director of Planning
' r • ~ ~
STAFF FINDINGS - September 21, 1978
PE-1168-78 - MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION
ZE- 13-78 - Agricultural to Single Family Residential
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
-This preliminary plat proposal has had an Environmental Impact Statement prepared
for it. The final Environmental Impact Statement, including review comments, has
been published as of September 13, 1978. The purpose of the Environmental Impact
Statement is to provide a maximum amount of information to the decision makers,
including the Planning Commission. Any unmitigated, adverse impact identified in
the Statement, including review commentary in response to the draft impact state-
ment, can be considered grounds for the Commission to conditipn or deny the pro-
posal, pursuant to R.C.W. 43.21C.060.
A. Location
-Midilome subdivision is situated in the south central Spokane valley, It is
east of the Dishman Mica Road and south of Opportunity, more specifically,
it is bounded by Pines, Bowdish Road, 32nd and 40th Avenue. (Reference page 9
of the D.E.I.S.)
B. Proposal
-As the Planning Commission may remember, the proposal entails 25 acres, and
72 lots that have already been approved, The E,I.S, addresses the entire
plat, which with the lots approved, is for 160 acres, and a total of 425
lots, all for single family residences.
-The plat as presented today is for the remaining 353 lots at a gross density
of about 2.6 per acre, and a lot size of 10,500 to 11,500 square feet.
C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan
-The approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of
the proposed plat area with no specific densities designated,
D. Existing Land Uses
-The land is vacant with approximately 60 acres in cultivation. (Reference
page 108 of the D.E.I.S.)
-Land to the north is residential in character with subdivisions such as
Kokomo townsite and Skyview acres at approximately the same density as the
proposed plat.
-To the west is the approved portion of Midilome and other subdivisions,
Aloha Addition and Castle Addition, extending to the Dishman Mica Road.
-South and east of the proposed plat, the land is in larger parcels of vacant
and agricultural uses. Directly east across Pines Road, is the Chester
Elementary School.
E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses
-The proposed plat appears compatible with other residential use and complies
with recent and past Planring Commission decisions in the area.
_ 2A _ cont'd.
~
'y " i •
STAFF FINDINGS - September 21, 1978 Midilome First Addition
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
-Those items that are normally covered by the Planning Staff within this
section of the Findings have not been addressed, as the staff feels they are
considered in the final draft of the Northcrest Environmental Impact State-
ment. The staff recommends that the Environmental Impact Statement be
retained in the plat file as an official part of these Staff Findings.
III. ZONING
-Pending approval of the final plat, it would be appropriate to reclassify the
zoning to Single Family Residential.
IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
-Reference the Midilome Environmental Impact Statement.
V. CONDITIONS
If approval is granted, the Staff recommends the following conditions.
Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced
in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard Conditions for Approval of
Preliminary Plats," August, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department.
NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter.
-P-l, P-2, P-31, P-42 P-52 P-65 P-7, P-82 P-9, (October l, 1979.)
-A-1 (Engineering conditions not received at time of printing.)
-H-3, H-4
-That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 R.C.W., and the
Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project
applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commission-
ers, with regard to the preliminary plat approval, as instructed by the Planning
Department Staff.
-That all public well sites in the plat shall provide for Model Irrigation District
control of an area within a 150-foot radius of each public well.
-No privately-owned wells shall be authorized in the plat.
-That a storm drainage plan and the sewer plan will be approved by the Spokane County
Utilities Department prior to finalizing the final plat.
2 g -
. ~
STAFF FINDINGS - September 21, 1978 Midilome First Addition
V. CONDITIONS
(NOTE: Following are the conditions which were added at the Hearing of
September 21, 1978, of the Planning Commission.)
-That the Department of Ecology must review the sewerage system and disposal
facilities for approval or disapproval.
-Engineers Conditions:
-E-13 E-25 E-35 E-45 E-51 E-6, E-75 E-85 E-9
-That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of
the County Engineer. Existing County Roads providing direct access to lots of
the plat shall be curbed to the standards of the County Engineer.
-No direct access from lots to 32nd Avenue
-That road improvement requirements, including sidewalk construction along
arterials, will also apply to Phase One (Mililome Addition) as indicated in the
Environmental Impact Statement.
~ 2C -
O' -~rICE OF COUNTY EN ~~~v,~ER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
:
DatP • ~ 2 , 19 72S
Inter-office Communication E C E i V E
B&t4tOM4 R To
. • d SEP 12 1978
fron,
Subject cPOKANE COUN7Y
PLANNING DEPARTMtN i
74 ~ . .
~
+ .
Form 327-C R
OFF'__~'E OF COUNTY ENGI: :ER
SPOKANE COUN7'Y, WASHINGTON
' Date S~EPTe%ASGIZ 13 .01978
, .
lotoir-ofhte CoMmuniGatioe
Ta PLANNING COMMISSrON .
f GA6lY KENNALY, PI.ANNING 6 TRAFFIC DIVISIUN ENGINEER ~K.
~ .r , .
sub#Kt ROLD GQNDITIQN9 * FQ$ MoS-?g AA I Ql LQ&-A- ~o•J, . .
*CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDEk CONSIDERATION ot that coaditional approval of the plar is given eubject to dedicati.on oL Right of
Way to the public and approval of the road syste:a ia the plat by the Couatx Fa,gitssa=;
.
~ that plans, profile9, aad cro9s sections showing propo9ed atrest centerlfas aud Cusb
grades be submitted to thn Couaty Engineer for approval prior to conaC,rutr,4on au4
the filiag of a final p1at; ,
0-that drainage plan9 aad design calculations ehowing the grades and aligagoat of dsain-
age iacilities be submitted to the Couaty Enginear for approval prioz t.p CpasL:FuCGfvn
az3 the filing of a fiaitl plat; .
!-D4 -constructfan within tha proposed public streets and ease:asnta ahall be perforMe4
undec tha direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall bo reapqn,sible
For perpetuatiag all evidance of ths loca[fon o: aurvey monumaeate whieh yaay be
dis turbad during construction and who ehall furnish thz Cowo:[y $ogiaser witts °'A$
.Built" plans and a certificate in Writing that all improvemants wsrs LaaC*11,ed to
the lines and grades shown on the approved coastzvctloa plans actid rhat oll, disrurbed
monumanCs have been replaced; .
" construction work is to be performed within the Publie Right of Way until a pa1mit
has bezn issuad by tha County cngineer. All work fs subjeCC ta ia3pect3,oa and aQproval.
by the County En3inaer;
Oall construction within the Public Righ[ of Way is to be complet@d prior to filing
the Einal plat or a bond in th_ amount es tionated by the CounCy Engiassr to cover the
cosc of con3truction of improv2ments, constructioa certificatfon, "As 8uilt" plaawa and monu.~eating the street centerlines shall be filzd vith the Gounty En,gi;;aer.
Ono direct acceas from lots co 1/2 right of weys untll auch Cime e• additionel righ~ of
ways are dediceted end roeds are es[eblished ae Coutlty [Loede.
.
; d-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until euch roeds are construc[ed
to County Standards and established as Counry Koads.
(3 road dtsign, construction, and dreinege cun[rol for 1/2 rights of waye
end Stub Road connecCions ere the responeibiliry of thz Developer.
10-that the Sponsor shell prepare end aubmit to ehe County Engineer e design proposel eccept-
able to the Stete Higtiway DeparGment of the propoeed State Highway-Cour►ty Roed intsr-
deetion. S[ate Highwey Depertment approval of the propoaed design must be ceceived prioz
to the filing af Che final plat. tmprovecuente to the State Highway are to be the respon-
sibility of the Sponeor and may eiLtier he constructed ur a bond to cover the cost of such
improvements furnlshed [o the County Engineet in the eaiount as determined by the Coua[y
Engineer end the Ste[d Highwey Depertiaent.
11 that, a11 roads wi i.hin tt►e plat be curbed ~►.nd~ p~sved to the 5pecification9 of the County
Eaigirlec;r. l:xistin8 CountY roads providing direct access to lot9 ot the plat shall be
~
pavdd and*w curbed to the standards of the County Engineer.
-direct access frarn lots to ~Uec-
~-dediC-ation of' lot additional itight of Way alon€ 3Z~4 ~J,, tc-
.-14-Lriat tr_e oknei,Ilis grantees and assigns agree to participate in and not oppoae or
:,rotest an HID on
(go", Z*) Ttt 4 T R.Q•a p ~ r••.. ~~1e vo+~E,~.~ T l~ 4~.aJ~ 2E3•~~'~U TS CGvGl~.+l6 S~oEw~K
~ Cp.v S tKv c2-,c0V
kvo a6 •4 ~t-Ttc Q.~r4 ~..Y / W 14 Lj4 C S c 44 PPc-Y 'r'o
S 1 v 0(C4Tt= O t y Tr4C ~r✓ V ~ ~.e w~ o•. E•v t"' ;
~ / Sr•~ ?'ca• E~/T ;
. ~
AGENDA, September 21, 1978 TELEPHONE N0. 456-2274
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL HEARING
Time: Thursday, September 21, 1978 - 8:30, or as soon after as possible
Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor
721 North Jefferson (at Broadway), Spokane
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION and ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
Agenda PE-1158-78, MIDILOME FIRST ADDITION
Item ZE- 13-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
No. 2 a. Location: Section 33, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W.M.
NE 1/4 of Sec. 33, Spokane County, Washington,
EXCEPT Midilome Addition, Also EXCEPT R/W for 32nd Ave., Also EXCEPT R/Ir1
for Pines Road, Also EXCEPT R/W for Bowdish Road.
b. Sponsor: Midilome, Inc.
c/o Robert Tomlinson
W. 606 Third Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99204
c. Engineer: Charles E. Simpson
N. 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, WA. 99206
d. Site Size: 128 Acres
e. Number of Lots: 365 Lots
f. Proposed Land Use: Single Family Dwellings
g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural (Established 4/11/67)
h. Proposed Zoning: Single Family Residential (R-1)
i. 4Jater Source: Model Irrigation District #18
j. School District: Central Valley District #356
k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Community Treatment Plant
l. Environmental Impact: An Environmental Impact Statement has been
prepared for this project, and was circulated from August 4, 1978 to
September 8, 1978; therefore, a topic of discussion at this Hearing may involve
information contained in this Environmental Impact Statement. A copy of the
Environmental Impact Statement is available for public inspection at the Spokane
County Library-Valley Branch, E. 12004 Main, or at the Spokane County Planning
Department office.
ol
s < i 7J t7 T o :f ~ \ 1 ul' +,'F 1 ' .i -~'i -t ~
:J ; ~Iz M 1L~•
. . ,
I '
ee~~a.'. L
•e~ e ,'r„ J .~7 'J
, ~ E ~
1 ` . ` , , • L' 1
VCN stoneefc:r.lafl.l
- - p
~
AGENDA, September 21, 1978 Telephone No. 456-2274
SPDKANE CQLJNTY PLANNING_CDMMISSIUN
SPEcrTL HEARrNG -
Tirne. Thursday} September 21, 1978 -8:30 A.M.
Place: Broadway Gentre Bui1 ding ,Second F1 oor
- N. 727 Jef ferson (at Broadwa,y ) Spokane
8:30 A.M.
A. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS Page
1. PE-1119-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION
ZE- 44-78, AGRICUtTURAL ta SINGLE FAMILY RESiDENTTAL
WOLFLAND, ING 1
2. PE-116$-78, MIDILOME FIRST AQDITION
ZE- 13-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
MTDILOME, INC 2
i 2: 00 Naan Lunch
1:30 P.M. Recanvene
B. SHORT PLAT SIJBDIIIISIQN APPEAL (pramptly at 1;30 P.M. )
l. SP'-78-059, SHORT PLAT by J. Bevan
APPEAL by GAUBINGER 3
C. PRELIMINARY SUB~IVISYONS AriG ZONE REtLASSIFICATION~
(Morning session cantinued, if necessary)
~
SPOKANE COUNTY ~ • - ~ ' , ~ ' a
LANNING DEPARTMENT
~ y
d~,~ c C a
N. 811 JEFFERSON SEP-7'20
~
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
D, R. STARK
E 8120 FIRST
SPOKANE, WA 99206
n
I V E ~
_r ~ - - - - ~ - ~ ~ S E P 13 1978 ~
ED ~NE
~FP 7
A
' ~~yr•~~-~ DdRESS V ' SPOKANE COUNTY ~
~73 ti~ ~
TQ SE~ ~~DER PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~
SPOKANE COUNTY
~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ ~ . ~ ~
~ , ,w a J rJ`V .L1a
N. 811 JEFFERSON ~„,,,r ~ ~ + ~
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
C ~
S E P 12 1978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLAIWNlNG DEPARTMENT
o~o ' COMMERCE MORTGAGE
,
PO BOX 3545 a
.SPOJ<ANE-; G!A 99220 ~
PLEASE FORWARD PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 11, 1978
~
LOAN #033033 w 3~_
~
'33
f , r`
LAND FILE POLL CARDS AUG 2 9 197A
RBQUSSM HZ P~n~ K o✓ i~
PFiOI+E z a 7 C-/
CHARGE---~~~-~9~ • ~-a Q-
_ , - PROJ=
- _ _ - - - - - - -
X CoGE SEC. IT A q, 8LK,-LoT K
L t S .ro 7 8 ~ I O 13 14 9 L~
4~ ~ , _ _ . _ .
, 6 9 1 O ~ ~ - - - - - - - -
~ 9 1 i - O O -
' Kev h
< Cha rTtto : 5901 _
' col . 1 ie a quote mark ( rnuneric "H"
; rc 9 1 ' OL A t -
cols. 2 - 4 is cooatant "691" . ~ - - ' - " - - -
c ol3. 5- 13 ie nnmeric wi th blaaks- acxs ptable
' Do nat zero Pili,
~
. ~ col. 14 13 a quote mnrk (aumeric
6 9 i . 01 Identify and separate batches for computer room.
, ; 1 7 • D, / /
~ This job must be completed no 1-ater than two (2)
~02 daYs after receiPt.
Forward data to the computer room for processing.
i Return these sheets to the Planning Department
~ ea! n of Keypunching; attention of:
9 t Se J us er.
rQ 9 i -0 G d
,
~
d
~ G9 r o ,
• ~ C od i ra exat~ple a
.
~
g 1 I -310 $EC. T. A Q. SLil.•tCT
O' 10 13
A i- 0, S, OLL Parcel rnsmber 32541-0801 on1~y
3.2,5
691► ,
9 L 14t1-0, O Parcel numbere 32541-0800 thru 32541-0809
C 9 1~ ~ • D, S► O~ ~ . 4-C,~.T Parcej numbers 32541-0800 thru 32541-C89a
Ids 1/4 ot aec. 32, tvp. 25, rge. 44
i - t~ A1T of aec. 32, tvp. 25, rge. 44
10. Z514
- , •
- (05~ Pa's , 4 ! - A 1F oP txp. 25, rge. 44
_ - + j I I 4j - A 11 of rge• 44
1
• ~ , Sectloae vithin
. .6-9 Townahip/R,anRe
vor
06 04 o oz ol
• ~ ~ I ~12
0? 04 I
► ~
181171~6115114113
1 12012I!22 2 12.L
.0,O02181 bzb
3
~ 69 1' s -
. ,
69 11 , i ,0,
, ~ 11 - , ~arter aections
b 9 - D rrithia section
: ~ . ► ~ ' ,~..a~.~. _ 2 1
,
,_,~L ► ~ -Ot0 i
~ li' 3 .4
..s_._..
s=_g, oap
LAND FILE POLL CARDS
_ ~QU&= BY
- PHONS
_ CHARGE-T&(" nATZ
~
, - - - - ~ -
.r ~ ~ .
Ps coGE 56c. rr R 0. eLM.-LoT K
~
~ 1 5,34 L 0, Pe
. ~
. ~
• - 1
, . G 1 /t I Ch3rge t0:
col. 1 i~a a quate mark (~~aeric
o ~ ~ 1.3 ~ aals. 2 - 4 ia cor~~~~ 0-691".,
; 6al co13. 5 - 13 ia numeric- vith__b1azka._&c=sPtab1e
Da nat zero fil I..
; col. 14 13 a quo'r.e mark (numric ""H"! ).Y-
~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - - - - - - d- -
Identify and separate batches -for eamputer room.
. ~ ,
. ~ YhY s job mus t be camp1 eted- no later than twa (2)
fi t i ' ~ - - -
x ~ daya dftel^ Y'Ece1 pt, -
3 69 1 ~ - ' Forward data ta the -camputer-roam for- processing.
. E 4 , , - Return these sheets ta the Planni ng Departmerrt
• i rt up2 F'
eti on of I~e,I unching; attenti- n of.
74lmS e ~t i c~ 'n
_
9 1-
1 ~
r G9 ~i ~
~V qa eA
.
Crt A, 4. B L~4.~ LG~
Co E1 a ! °I m 13
' 6 3 14 - 4 o ~ ~ - ~0, 1 Parcel c~umbe~r 3251~-08L71 oa~
7 ~ ~ . ~ ' ParceI rnzbera 32541-0800 trru 32542-0809
° t aL3 Farcel rn~ers 32541-0800 tY= 32541-05'~
C~ ~ 1e1 I
J - ~ t 1 M 1/4 of aec. 32, twp• 25, rga * 44
AlI of aac. 32, twp. 25, rge. 44
_
- { 'l 6 '
All of twp. 25t Tge.
flo, fQ~l A 1l of rge. 44
il 4
S"t.,icme Vithin
"i..~~ TvunshiDNrmo
' 1 4,0 f o • 06 0 02 k 01
07 ~i CP, 110 12 12.
~ ~ ~ 51, , T ~ 1s ~ 17 ,L6115 ~14 131
~ ~ ~ 2012I~ ~23 2-4
~
127 zJ2
0 29128 6
' 3112? 135 1 J6 .JJ
~9 1' 11-2
c~ Yo
169 1 .~,0, ~
Gue.rter emctionlr
sect,ian
. _..,c Jkc I ± ~ 09 PA43 i 3
•~i~~i_7 ~
161
"T
. SH&=_L OF.5.~
LAND FILE POLL CARDS
RBGUSSTSa HZ _F4A06Pd I G
L
' PFiONE Z t &
CHARGE- . -59-0- O1/590302 D&TS
FBDJ=
' ,
X [OGE SEC. IT. R Q, pLK,-lOT K
L 4 S 7a3, io 13
1 ~
~ 9 L,33S0- O 3
- ~
C. 91 " 0 s - - - - - -
,
~~-07
, Kav~unch inat fons
D Charge to. 01
col. 1 ia a
Ls- 0 3 -J quota mark (numeric "H" ) • - - -
co19. 2 - 4 ia conatant "691": - -
_~1. 3~rsi~~3• ~O1Z9 cols. 5- 13 ie rnimeric- uittL blaaka_ncceptable
' Do nat zero Pill.
. col. 24 13 a quote mark (numeric
_~9 L 2 7s - D G ' -
0~ ~ Identi fy and separate batches for computer -room.
~
_ j ~ • L,o,07
- t o LThi s job must be compl eted'no 'later than "two (2)
~
days after receipt. - - - -
6 ~1 t
s6°~ , tA 41, Forward data to the computer room for processing.
i
.?43 Return these sheets to the Plannina Department
upon com letion of Keypunching; attention of:.
etxn ectio •
~ 9 1 ,0
0/
.
G9
~ iL, s
• ' - / ~i
~ ~ ► ;
,Cp 9 1 i 6 2.~( sEC, r, R. o. aM+LcT
. ~,~~~I '/,~,as~ ~6 ~ ?►9 io ~3
121 514 1i- J, 9, 0, L Parcel number 32541-0801 only
t-/ / o~ ~~4i 1-0 O Parcel numbere 32541-0800 thru 32541-0809
C9 1. 1 I,7 1 3,2,1 S►4-1 1 ParceZ numbers 32541-0800 thru 32541-0899
~ a NF 1/4 of aec. 32, 25, rge. 4•4
,3, ,$141 A1T of aec. 32, tvP. 25, rge.
: _ .
,~.1514' A1l oP txp. 25, rge.
412L~3 A 11 of rge. 44
Sectf one vi thin
-6...~ ? jo1w0n, hiv n~
16 ~ - ~ ob o oz ol
. 0'l 9 I0
1I ? 12
,!63 o 3, i 181171io11511.41
13; 231
124
1011271261
'I •Lo, o, 31 2 I 8 251
. .
.
~691' • O
T ,
6 9 1 I Qaarter eectiona
6 9 - A xithin aectfon
' (.~0 3 4
, ; -
-~p 91 , ,
~
Ir e oI 7~ I 1
LAND FILE POLL CARDS
RBQiESSa B7 , 00I C
PHOI+S 2 T y
DATE Z g• 7$
CHARGE TO•:---<9al
_ . _ _ ~ - - - - - - - - ~ _
9 Co GE SEC. iT R p, 8tf(.-l0? K
, z 4 S ~ 7 8 3 10 13 ; ~C-,~/ G 8• ~ Y _ .
_ G 9 L ,Z, i S i t~/
- OZ
. ,
~ 9 1 i
~
691 - o
. ~ ~ - - - - - - - - . _
G 9 1 m
Ka h ong - _ _ _ ^
~ Cha rge to : 901 _ _
col. 1 1s a quota mark ( nurneric "Kt").
cola. 2 - 4 is coaat,ant "691": - ~ - -
cola. 5- 13 ia rnmeric xith blanke_accsptable - -
' Do nat zero Pill.
~ , col. T,4 is a quote msrk (numeric '*H",).--
Identi fy and separate batches for computer room.
• ~ ~
~ This job must be completed no later than two (2)
6
'6 days after receipt. -
; g, t ~ • i ~
s6g1 _ I,1 Forward data to the computer room for processing.
~
Return these sheets to the Planning Department
• ~ upon ~ letion of Keypunching; attention of:
• ~ ~ ~ I ' a t Sec t i e /7nninn Cc~t;~,n„T=/2o,.*,, A~i1....1CtAY`
-9
~91 - I
~
G9 ,
• -WP Codi u ei,a oIe *
~5P 9 1 i $EC.IT, A. 4. SI.K.+IGT
S 6i T ?19 10 13
63 3,2 1 -0 0 1 Parcel number 32541-0801 only
? r -1.~~4,1-0 O. Parcel rnuabere 32541-0800 thru 32541-0809
' Parcei numbers 325~41-CS00 thru 32541-089~3
~
C9 i
Q t, ' I ~ ME 1/4 0f xc. 32, tvg. 25, rgs. 44
; ,
S 41 - A1l of aec. 32, tw. 25, rge. 4.4
. _ ~ 9 1.~. ► - _~__~__!-1 .
- , AlI oP txp. 25, rge.
~
' A11 of rge. 44
'
_6 9
L,.SaCtlOIIa withSA
TovnehipNnp~,e
' o L 06105104103102 ~ OI
• ~ 07 08 09{IO,L112
18 I 17 I ~6 115 f1.G I 13
._,691, s_~ ► ls_! 1 120i2I,221231124
29128127126125
31 2 ' S Jb
:
~69 1' ~ i i i ' ► '
7 ,
; 9 L ~-~-1-~ Qisrter aections
b 91~ I~I ► txithia ~ctj:on
. i ,
6,9 . ► ~ ~ - ~....i._.j.~_ _ 2 1
3 ~
_v 09 L ~ ~ ► ~ ' ~
; g i ,-s-.~ ► ~ ' t
i ~ i ' ► , , "
t
, . .
r---
~
PE-1168-78 & ZE-13-78
In the Matter of a Hearing to consider the application of Midilome, Inc., West
606 Third Avenue, Spokane, Washington to file a plat to be known as MIDILOME
FIRST ADDITION. Also to consider changing the Zoning map from Agricultural to
Single Family Residential on the property described below, such zone change to
become effective only upon the filing of a final plat or plats of such property.
The property being platted is described as: NE 1/4 of Sec. 33, T 25N, R 44 E.W.M.,
Spokane County, Washington, EXCEPT Midilome Addition, Also EXCEPT R/W for 32nd
Avenue, also EXCEPT R/G1 for Pines Road, also EXCEPT R/4J for Bowdish Road.
(South of 32nd Avenue approx. 800 feet east of Bowdish Road.)
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTIAIG
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY 4F SPOKANE )
c ~
L_~ ~IPgI~Kat~ !c, , being flrst aulysvvorn on oath,
deposes and says:
That I am a cLtizen of the United States of Amerlca, and a resident of the State of
Washington over the age of 16 years.
That on the A day of-~75, 19 76 , I personally
posted one (1) or more erue an8 correct coptes of, ne hereto attached and Incorporated
herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ln a consplcuous manner at each of,
the followtng locations, to-wtt:
I)~
d~ V,,S ~ 1) ~ A& W C(~j
. ~
- v DAT£D THI.S ~ DAY OF ~ ► 19 -7~ •
.
SIGNE~)
Subscrlbed and Sworn to before me thts S/v, day of 1978
,
` ~ .
Notary Public tn and for the State of
`Nashtngton, residlng at Spokane, Washingto;
a ,
1~~~~~~~ r~~~~ T€!LEPHONE N~, Q~~I-~~~~ S~~KK~NE Cl~4JNTY ~LANNIN~ ~~MI~ISSION
S~E~I~L HEA~~I~~
,
Yime: Thu~sda~y, September 21, 19~8 - 8:~~, ~r a~ sovn ~fter a~ pass~bl~
P~a~e. ~roadway Centre ~u1l~ing, S~cond Floor
~ 721 ~o~~h J~~f~rs~n ~a~t Br~~dway}, S~~Kan~
~~ELIMIN~,~Y SU~~I~ISI~~ a~d ~L~N~ RE~CLASSIFICATI[~~V
A~~nd~ PE-11~8-7~, I~IIDI~~~~ FIR~T ~UDITI~N
I~er~ 13y78, AGRIC~ILTU~~l. t~ ~INGI~ f~41~'IILY R~SI~ENTIAL
No, ~ ~
a, L~~ation: Section 33, Town~~ip 25N, '~an~~ 44 E.~I.M.
NE lI4 af S~c. 33, 5pokane Cour~~y, 1~ashingtQn,
~~LC~~~' I~~di 1 o~me ~d~di tion, A1 sa ~~~~PT ~JW fvr ~2nd Av~. , A1 ~o ~XCEPT ~~'W f~r Pines Roa~, Alsa E~iCE#~T R~W ~or Bowd7sh ~toad.
b. ~p~n~or~ Mirl~~ome, Ir~c, ' ~;~~F~~ '
c/~ ~ot~ert 1`4m1 ~ nsa~ ~ ~ , ,r~ , i~ p
'W. ~~Q~ Thir~i Rv+e~ue
Sp~~~n~, 'WA, 9~~~4
c. Engin~er: Charl~~ E. Simpscan f , I~ , ~~19 Argonne ~vad
5pakane, 'WA. 9~~~~ ~
d. Si~e 5~ze: l~B Ac~^es
e. Numb~r o~ Lots: 36~ Lats
~F. Propt~sed Land lJse: Singl~ ~~;miiy Uw~e~li~gs .
g. ~~~~ting Za~n7ng: Agr~icultur~l ~E~tablis~ed 4~~1~'f7}
h. ~w~ap~sed Ionin~~ Single Family R~~id~n~ial ~R-~~ i. "~at~~ 5~urc~: 1~~d~1 ~rr7ga~~on [~~stric~ #18 ~
j. ~C~Id~01 L11S~1`1C~. Centra~ 1fa11ey District #356 ~
k. N~et~ad ~f 5~wa~e Q~spa~~al ~ Camrnunity ~r~eatr~ent P1ant
Envir~~mental Ir~pac~: An Environmental Impact Stat~ment h~s b~en ~
prep~r~~d for thi s pra j~e~t, ~rrd was +ci rcu~ a~t~d fr~m August 4, 1~1$ t~
September S, 1978, therefc~re, ~ t~opi~ af discussinn at ~his H~~rin~ ~nay involv~
in~forrnattian c~antain~d i~t this Env~ron~ne~nta~ Impa~t Statement. A c~py of th~ ~nvir~anmenta1 Imp~ct Stateme~t is avai~able f~r pu'~lic inspection at ~'he S~+~kane
Cvunty Library-Valley Branch, E, ~2~D04 I~ain, c~r ~t ~h~ S~~k~ne County ~l~nning
Departm~nt of~ic~.
' I~ r ~1~.~ a . - ~ ' A.. _ ,r ~ _
_~,r ~ - - - r
I ' I ~ ! - 1~~ d ~ .
.r..4 , . ~ '
~ 4 ~ ~ _ ` ~ ~f~ •.S F~i~ , M~ ly l~ " ~ n ti I~ q ~ M 1• fA e ~e ~ ~ ~M~.
~ '
a ~ . ~ i ' ~ 1 L~
t ~ ~ ~ ;v,~. e~ ~ _
` f . I W~ ~ _ ~ ~ r~ ~ -
. - t ~.7~"? ~-~ti. 1`, Y r.,
~ ,4~ ~ _ "i~ ' ~ r ~ ~
~ r~ _ - ~ l
~ t ~ ~ ti ~ ► it ~ #irrl_?~~a~1~1 ~
~r'~ r ~i1~r~ ~rrr~~~~1~~~a~►~. ~~C~r~c~~'
Pl~~nning [~epartr~~n~, Pu~lic 1~vrks ~uil~in~, N. ~11
~treet, ~p~ok~n~, 'U~I~~~ing~on.
Direc~~r r~f P!a
~pakane G~unty Planni FBRM i~a r6Mrs.
sPoKANE cauNrY HEALTH DIsTRICT
Inter-Office Communi cation
Date: September l1. 1978
TO: Spokane Cou P_ tng Commission y
- .
F R0M: Eugene C.Prather , R. 5. ,
~
5UBJECT: Prapvsed prellminary plat ~ 3HIDILOME FIRST ADUIT~ON
~
1. References;
~
a. MaP of subject, scale 1" 200' b y SimF ~ san• 12112/77. ~
b., Grot~nd Water Resources and Related Gealogy A~otth--Central Spokane an~I`
Southeastera Stevena Counties of Washingtun, Department of Water Re-
sourcea, State of Washington, 1969.
c. The E££ect of Applied Surface Waters vn Groundwater Quality in the
5pokane Valley, D.K. Todd, Seetifln 20$, Water Resources Study - Metro-
palitan Spokane Regian, U.S._Army Cvrps of Engineers Seat:tle Dtstrict,
Aptil ? , 1975.
d. Sail Suruey, S vkane County, Washington, 5oil Conservation Service,
T1. S.D.A. , March, 1968.
e. ~pokane County, Washiagton Engineering Intergretations, 5oi1 Canserva-
tian Service, i1.S.D.A,, August, 1974.
f. Draf t Env3ronaneatal Impact Statenent - MIDILOME SUBDIVISt0N, August, 1978.
g. Letter, Spokane Caunty Health District to Fred Dayharsh, Countp P1anning
Il3rectar, "Midilome Snbdivision -Draft EIS't, September 8, 1978.
(copy attaclhed.)
2. Tapvgraphy, soils and water:
a. See referenceg 1. f and g.
b. Soils are suitalale for use of subsurface disposal of effluent from
asewage treatment plant as praposed b~ the p1at spvnsor. Currently,
Eloek 13, Lots 15 through 20, Black 24, Lot~ ~through 1t and Block 21,
Lots I through 6 are to be reserred for a sewage disposal area. The
size of this area will be adjusted ta meet the conditivns of sewage
dispvsal p1ans as finally apparnved by Department of Ecoldgy, Department
of Social and Health Services, the County Engineer and this office.
c. The Made1 Irrigativn District has indicated that the plat lies with3.n the
Dis~rict's service area and can be pravided water subject tn cantractural
arrangements between the Aistrtct and the plat sponsor.
3. Recammendationet
a. A Public water system ineluding fire prntection flows serve each lot in
the plat prior ta sale of the lot.
5GHD4ADM-118
Midilome First Additi,~ ~
~ Page 2
f September 11, 1978
b. All public well sites in the plat shall provide for Model Irrigation District
control of an area within a 150-foot radius of each public well.
c. No privately owned wells shall be authorized in the plat.
d. Each lot shall be served by a public sewer system prior to sale of the lot.
e. The public sewer system plans shall have been approved by the required
agencies prior to construction and any subsequent use of the system.
sm
cc: Charles E. Simpson Engineers, N. 909 Argonne Rd. 99206
Robert Tomlinson, E. 12716 Sprague
file
Spo County ~,5ne Hed t DiSi r ic i
'34~
Wes► 1 101 College Avenue Spokone, Wnshingron 99201
y~ i Z",'~ • ~ ^ t4
~~~tc;u,ber 8, 1973
tdr. Frrd liayhursh Cowity Plaiining Dirrctor SpukeLnr Courity Ylarir,ing Comuiissioa
iV . 811 Je 1' f e r s on
Spoknue, WA 99101
kE: Midf lvme Subdivision - DraPt EIS
Deur Mr. Uayharsh:
,
"1'he Spukane County HeeL].tb District has reviewed the draft environcoental impact
stkt,emziit, 14idilome Subdivi4ion, prepared by HSVOrth and Anderson, Inc., and
has ttie folluving commrents :
I« tlie Introduction ^ plae i_paragraph 2- the stetement The proposed package
scungc treatwent facility aad distribution syatem vns approved by the Spokane
~ County Engineers on Mey 18, 1977; and by the Spokane County Health District on
; July 5; 19'17." is not wccurate. The Health District approval was for the
"subsurPace oeaage disposal facility" and no other portion of the system.
~
Pat;e 13, N3 Water - The depths to water table are ehoti+n as 70-90 feet. Our
~ recorde shav the depths to be 100 feet or tnore vheu ground elevations ere
4. similar to the site elevations.
Page 18d, 19 Water - Zn general., this report lmplies vater added to the ground
dt this site reaches the aquifer. 1'hia ia not a proved Y~ypat,heels.
2'he comwent that nitrates are not generally retained by poil colunmaa mey be
phi.losophically true; hovever, ther• is mounting datR to Bhow nit"ratea are
denitrified in soils.
Page 21, Public Services - Yau fail to addrese added burden on the Health District
and othcr health care. The comcuents bere rolate to extremeo aa some of the popu-
lation rnay already be preeemt Ltnd receiving Bervicee in the area.
Puee 23 -"The sewage treatment eyateaa propoeed for the project ie conaidered the
best available and reasonAble'treatmept, eystem- " T b ie $ ta temen t s h o u l d b e
rer+orded. It very% well may not be the *"best availablo", while in light of '
ecunomics, etgti it rnay be the reasonalpXe eyetem.
Ar.iminisrroiion . 456,3630 Personal Heolrh 456-3613 Environmenral Healrh 456,2340
Ulnic ' 456-3640 Viral Siorist(cs 456-3670 Labororory 456-3667
. , '
, ,
r
.
~
S~pt~c~Ler f3, 1978 ,
' Ptge 2
Pred Deyharbh
Pset 30 #3 - Altrrnate Development Concepts - You do not iaclude difPerent patterw$
euch as cul--de-$aca, cluetere, etc. In this you state the use ot septic tanka
vould tucrease potentia.l, for grownd vater contem3.nation. This i• an unproved
atateaent enA d,qes mot appmr to be a 3u8tiriea statement.
P4e 31 The drittr on nitrogen in ef fluant io questionable.
PMe 35, #3 - The comeat about effluant quality trom etabilitation.• ponde awd
lagaona bci.,ag mnrgina.l, must be questioAed end qualiiied in xhat rcapecte it is
Paze 35, On-Site Xcs,steveter Treatment - WheA discuaeing effluent qunlity, sp4cify
the parwwtero. Do x;ot mlc~o generalized stateme4t8 qiuCe th4y amy not be twuue
in thio project. ,
Ia diacu,esing alternwtiveo, you hi►ve not included xater-uae restriction devicea.
T'beBe can have cousidarable imcpact. Qne exuaple : In tho caae of s 25-aere site
for sewage lagoons, tbio aereage ;an be reducqd orer 4QZ. '
Pade 93, Tab2e Thare is an error in addition and subtractipn. Tptal appliod
water in yeur 2024 4houl.d rea,d "36.04". -
PaAe 94. Chrmical Storaee, Traaaport, and Uae The etwtelpeAt "dome aot exist"
ie too strang; leaks fron stoxRges te,nks And tzv►o 4 ceidpz~~q could xea~l.t in fuel
oil api118. ' , . _
PMe 102, Second Para r~Uh - Tha dr&intield in biolagical.ly activd ae the aevage
continu.&lly adds bactax'is and nµtrieuts ji;to q 4ui.tgbla e~uv~rq,1j
Yery truly youre, . . . ~ ~ . '
,
. F- . .
FDiVZROMF1NTAX. HE.11I.'T'U DIVI$X4N . ' _ , ' . • ` ~
- ' ' • , ~ ~ `Y~~,• ; , t ~ ~ ; ~ ti. ~ , ' ' .
A I .1 ~ J
IP7I ~ T~' • ,1 ,
Edvard M. PickQty' RwV• 9 X.Tr.i1•
Dircctor
• , , . ,
j~ , ' ' • ~ , : . . ,
~
2lY
' ` ' ` • f! ,f , ' t , ,
1 • • • ,
~ • ~ , ~ a, , i ,•t 1
, ` . ' , ~ . ~ ; ~`r . Y/~ f~l , ~ • r .
~ ~i : ~ . t,' r ~j4 1`~1;+r,,~,' ~ i' ^ •
. , r : ' ` • ~ ~ • ~
Ii'
, ' , . ; • . • . I ~ i''•'S ~4 yyr •.b ~ • ~ ~
7• . • , , - ~ j
/0000 57)0KANE VALLE~ FIRE DEPARTIAENT
\
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99246 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
~le 114wG ~~eA~l
September 18, 1978
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director
Spokane County Planni ng Commi ss ion
No rth 811 Jeffe rs on
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
The following preliminary subdivisions and zone classification
for upgrading has been revi ewed for fi re protection:
PE-1168- 78 Mi di l ome Fi rs tAddi ti on
ZE- 13- 78 Mi di 1 ome
Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this
area before construction is started.
~
A1-Co 0
Lt. of Inspectors
AC:sn
~PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI YES ~
~
J
s
LAW OFFICES
DELLWO, RUllULF & SCHROEDE.h, P S.
1016 OLD NATIOtVAt 6ANK BUIlO1NG
ROBERT D. DELLWO
KERMIT M. RUDOLF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
RtCHARD J. SCHROEQER (sos) 624-4291
TERRY W. MARTIN
TERRY T. GRANT
HEDLEY W. GREENE
ROBER7 J. ROBERTS
August 22, 1978
Spokane County P1 anning Comrni ss3on
Spokane County Courthouse
SAokane, 'lashington 99201
Re: Midilome First Addition
Gentlemen :
7hi s wi 11 adv i se that the 1 ands i n the proposed Mi di 1 ome First
Addition are included within the boundaries of Model Irrlqa~~tion
aistrict No. 78 and presently are apart of said district.
The annexati on order of sai d 1 ands provi des that sai d 1aids are
-d to viater service from the district subject to ~~Vwlupar
i:t his expense mains to and Ulithin said land~> qac~ing
41,A3~j the district a site for an additional wel!~ a site
for the con:;truction of a reservoir which will provide aJditional
storage capacity for the district. Tentative arrangements have been
made for a11 of these matters but i t i s not anti ci pated that the same
ti-jill be completed and actually constr«cted until the plat has been
appraved and the lots therein made available for sale. T~c district's
engi neer presen tly i s compl eti ng surveys i n order to aGtEtlP~,)h the
leqal descriptions of the welisite and the reservoir s`l';e and it is
anti ci pated that as soon as thi s has been done that t:-~c sc~ie wil 1 be
deeded to the district so that the district may have the same avFilable
for installation of 4se11 and construction of a reservoir at such time
i n the future as the di stri et determi nes the need exi sts.
A1 1 of the 1 ands i n Mi di 1 ome Fi rst Addi ti on , under the torrms of the
annexation order, will be subject to paying as connections a~e made
to the district's system, an equal izing or annexation charge c•9hich
vii1 1 be arri ved at after taki ng i nto account the costs of the distr°i ct
provi di ng the addi ti onal pumpi ng and storage capaci ty needed for the
servi ce of sai d 1 ands . A1 1 of thi s i s understood by the devel opnr
and steps are bej ng taken to have the same accotnpli shed and the distr°ict
. ~
40
~ w
SpoE~~~~ ~ounty Planwing Ccmmissicn
P~~~ ~ A"gust 22, 1978
has been assurQd by the developcrr' tha'~ ~ the Items will be
taken care of b~~~~~ ~~~s -,,Tv°ienes for~ ~~~~~l water serviceo
A:~~~~~!nq1y, the distwtct kncws of no reasen why said lawds may not
be consideped for platting basis of t°jatcr strvice fc~om. t~e
dostricto
y ,
VGears risnactful I~
, .
1'q
ti.1 ."y1
b0~'oe~ L i ~ /
By° o E.c trm t ~ Mo Rvdolf
, Secretary ,
Model grrtgatiqn District #78
,
cc Bob Tomlinson
Boat~
t~d cf Dtrrectors - ►
"~odea g~~~~~~~on Distpicto
r
E X H I B I T A
FI rOMMMIA,RY FLAT APPLICATION FOEM
AIL SIQNATQRE BLOCKS ((N PAGES 2 AM 3) MIIST HE FII.LID IlN, g' APPROPRILTE Hg'CRE L G
TO TEKE PLAT AEMINISTRATOR.
Part I- To be•completed by applicaat aa,d surveyor
ARFA AND Di.STA~TCE~`«s.s..~~..«~.s:..~....~....~s....«ws.~«ss*s......::...~«..s..s...+rs.....*.....
Total amount of lead i.n this Subdivision: 132 Acrea Total Number of Lots 365
Propo6ed density of the Plat: 2'7 Lots/Gross Acre
Total mmount of adjoining land controlled by t,his owner or sponsor: none Acres
P*_~oposes IIse of coatrolled a.djoin laad:
What iB the driving di staace in tailes to the nearest fire statioa? 3 miles
Shoppizig facilitiea? '2_ mi 1 es Municigal Baundary: Paved atreet or
highway adLacent ?
IAND II.S'~ss~*s~~~~s~~~~~**~s~~ss~~r~~isss~~w~~~assss~~r~~~~s~rs*s~s*s~~sw~s~~s+~~~~~s+ss~+as~sss~*~r•
Indicate the gropoeed land uae of the plat: Single Fnmily Dwe11 C x).
Dupleacss ( Iadicate lots for duplexes:
Multi-femily nM►ell.ing uaitB C Iadicate wir. ch lots:
Mobile ffomes C Other C De scribe ot,her uses:
Desc^-ir,e any noa-residential use propoecd in the Plat:
What is the present uae of the property proposed to be pla.tted? AUricultural .
List tyge of uses: Cultivated land: X acres. Pasture: acres.
Timber: acres. Vacaat: acreB. Other: . :Acres
Is keeping of aaimals deaired? No C x). Yes C Type:
~R~~~ITS**w*rs~w~~r~~tss+s*:rs~ssss~~+rs~~*s~ra~*~w*rs~w~ss~ss~ss~ss«aasa~~~s~~s~*t*ss~+~~+~ss:
. Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety e4s proposed, or will it be a mnL.ti-phase deve-
lopment? multiphase ,
To what level of improvement rri11 streets be constructed? Gravel C Minimum. ~
Curb and Gravel ( Curb aad Paved ( X). Paoed only C
Describe any combinations of above: What is the time period expected far cvmplete develapmeat af the P1at: 3years
Street improvemcats completed? . Substantial number of lots occupied?
Is dedication of aay laad for public uae contempleted? (Parks, schoola, etc.)
No. ( x). Yes ( Describe: ,
Ind3cate the aize of maits propoeed to be constracted: 1150 Square fcet
Number of badraems 3 • Estimated Sale Price $47,400
. .
Vill buildinga be built aa the lota bafore they are eold. No ( x). Yee ~
will auny special deed restrictiona be iacluded i.n the esle of lots? No t x). Yes ~
If "yeB", erplaia: ,
UT 11 ra~s~rriiM~~*is~*~F~F~i~~~«*+Rit~~si~f~~~~##/M~i~wM*4it~~srM~Raswr~frR~f~s~~ewMf~w~yM+~~i**M~~*~~ii
Tadicate the groposed method of eawage dispoeal.: Septic tank C Lagoon ~
Treatmeat plant ( X). 4ther, or caabinations (Describe) ,
Indicate the proposed source of water eupply: Indiv3.dua1 wells C Public aystem t x).
pZ'1.V8;t6 COmmun3ty 8yBtem ( ~ .
Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dr+ellings):
Undergrouad utility easements ( X). Overhead utility easements ~
Utilities in streets ( x). No eaeement9 (
Indi cate the di staace f raa thi B propo sa7 1. ~to the neare st exd eting wate r main : a d j a c e n t i e e t
In;di cate size of aeareet main: incheso
-OVER-
E X H I B I T A
PRII~IHINARY PLAT AFPLICATION F'ORM (Continued) page 2
UTILITM - (Continued)'~~*~sss*s*~~+~~+t*~*~s**s+ss~s*~***~*~**s**~~**ts~~r~tr~*ss~~sssss~~#s~w*rs
List utility compan.ies or districta expected to provide service to thi s Plat:
II.ectricity: I nl and • Gas: V,JP Water: Mod~l I rri oati orfhone: P~
PROPOSM ACIQTO'~[LmGd~NTS«•..s.•.~•*•....~.......~:.s.......~...~~.,~*..«:..~.**..:~.«.:.~~....:...........
MUT KpME: P 'ii di 1 ome Fi rst Addi ti on ,
I, the uadersigaed, have completed the i.aPornatian requ,e6ted, aad the Pr-l-i-MinAry Plat has
been prep er my aupervisioa ia accordaace with the requirements of zhe Spokaae
Cauaty e eat aad thre lar+a of the State of Vashingtin.
Sigatd) Date :4!~ Z! j 7 S
00 9967 i9967 a: ddre Bs . 9 4 9Ar~;ob. na- Rd . Phone : 9 Z6-! 3 Z Z
O~ #1 :-o S~~ G w,~ s~,• Zip : 9 9 Z6G
Fss~ ~,5~~
ofVAL ~ f
s~~oR Is
I, the undersigaed, swesr wader the penaltp of perjury that the above responses are
made truthfullp aad to the best of my knowledge. I furt,her swear that I AM THE OWNII3 OF
BDGORD.of the site propoeed as the preliminary plat, or, if not the owner, attached here-
rri.th is r+rittea permiasion frora said owaer authorizin.g my actions oa his or her behalf.
I also uaderstaad, shvuld there be aay willful misrepreBentation or willful lack or full
disclosure on my part, Spokaae County cnay rrithdraw aay declaration of non sigaificaace
that it might iseue ia reliaace upo s ecklist.
'
~ ~ C_ 2
(Sigaed) c • Data : a 4 7oR
(Addresa) Gv 60lv -c~ Phone :
,
o,~.~, { ZiP: 99L~~
4
NV1KRl DaLT VA. •
.
NaTA2Y ~~'F.AL :
. ~
•siMtft~+t~*t~f~~+ri/i4~i~M~i~~M~~t~it~~ilt*~~~~~ft~~1li~#iRl~~!#~F~Ms~~~t*si~~R~*~s*~i~~~fil~tl~~irs~~s~~i~i~!*
Psrt II - to be completed by rrater purveyor G~l ~ 72 ~
aituated rrithia cur eervice area.
A. Thia subdivision (ia) (11
B. We are (able ) (not able ) aad willing to snpplY thi s subdivi.si on wi th adequat.e water for
(domestic) (fire) (iadustri.al) (commercial) uses.
C. Satisfactory arrangemeat (have) (have aot) been made to serve this proposal.
D. Signature (oaly whea items A, B& C ara true and completed)
/ f
purveyors aame sigaature and titl.e cxate
~~M#+u***wM*M~+~r*M~t#~~M**~+1~*My~~~~My~t~ttriM~~*M1~*t~~**~*~~fiM*t**~+r~iRM~R~~~~w+MM#a*~~*~****~~#~M*r*M
Part IIT-to be co=leted by Hea`th District
A. 3ea? th Distric t staff has completed a field investigation of the site.
3. Heal`„h District nts tor ~)re? !.minarr* plats have oeen saVisf:ed.
C. $ift~ ~
/
~
signature and title
. , ~
' • A •
T X H I B I T A
BY PLAT AP'PLICATICK 3DW
(Contiaued) pav 3
ss*s**~,~,~~s~+~sss*s~~~s~a~*~~~r~~~~ss~~~i~ss~ss~*s~~ss~MSSS~~a~s~ts*fs~~s*s~s+►s~~~s~s~~~s~s~s~~•
Part IV - to be campleted by Couaty Eagiaeers Otfice
A. Coun.ty EngiaeerB Office requiremeats for preliminary plate ave`Ahave not) beea
satisfied.
B. Signe.ture
SIS ~ sY
' gaature an~. ti
ssrs~ss~~~~~~ass~ra~~~~s~s~s~~~s~s~~~~~~~~sr►~~s~~~r~~~a~~r~r~~*s*~ts*~s*~w~~s~ss~s~*~ss~~s~~s~~~•
part V- to be comgleted by Cownty Utilitiea Dept.
A. Couaty Utilities Departmeat re.quirements for preliminar9 plat have (haQe not) been
sa t-i 6f ied.
• ~
3. Sigaature
signature and title date
•s~~+►r~w~r*+w~++~s~r~+4s~~~~~~Mar~w~~t~s~~sst**s*~*w~~s~ss~~~ss~~sssss*ss~sM~s.*~srss~rr~tsst~ss~•
This part to be completed by P1anning Dapes'ttaent
Planninq Department Information
~ ai
Date Submitted : ~ _ Preliminary Plat Fee: /DD
,
Date Accepted : =i~---~ Checklist Fee:
Plat File No. Zone Change File No. Plat Name: Existinq Zoning :
Number of Lots : Date Established :
Location : Sec. ~ T R Advertised Zone Change : r~- / -
~
School District: ~//-ZL-~~Checked by: Xv~JU
Hear ing Date :
,
~ t n
44L.
LAW OFFlCES ~
DELLWO, P.UDO1_P & sCHROF-Dr1Z, P.S.
ROBERT D. DELLWO 1016 OLD NATIONAL BANK BUILDING
KERM{T M. RUDOLF SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
RICHARD J. SCHROEDER (509) 624-429I
TERRY W. MARTIN
TERRY T. GRANT
HEDLEY W. GREENE
ROBERT J. ROBERTS
August 22, 1978
Spokane County Planning Commission
Spokane County Courthouse
Spokane, ;+lashington 99201
Re: N3idilome First Addition
Gen tl emen :
Thi s wi 1 1 advi se that the 1 ands i n the proposed Mi di 1 ome Fi rst
Addi ti on a re i ncl uded wi thi n the boundaries of Model I rri gation
Di strict PJo. 18 and aresently are a part of sai d di strict.
The annexation order of said lands provides that said lands are
entitled to vrater service from the district subject to the developer
installing at his expense mains to and arithin said lands and making
available to the district a site for an additional well and a site
for the construction of a reservoir which will provide additional
storage capacity for the district. Tentative arrangenents have been
made for all of these matters but it is not anticipated that the same
vaill be completed and actually constructed until the plat has been
approved and the lots therein made availabie for sale. The district's
enqineer presently is completing surveys in order to establish the
legal descriptions of the wellsite and the reservoir site and it is
anticipated that as soon as this has been done that the same will be
deeded to the district so that the district may have the same available
for installation of well and construction of a reservoir at such time
in th2 future as the distriet determines the need exists.
AT1 of the lands in Midilome First Addition, under the terms of the
annexation order, will be subject to paying as connections are made
to tile district's system, an equalizing or annexation charge which
Viill be arrived at after taking into account the costs of the district
providing the additional punping and storage capacity needed for the
slo-rvice of said lands. all of this is understood hy the developer-
and steps are being taken to have the same accomolished and the districi: ~
Spokane County F'lanning Commission
Pa9e 2 t1ugust 22, 1978
has been assureC by the devel oper that al 1 of the i tPms wi 11 be
taker care of before the time arrives for actual water service.
Accordi nqly , the distri ct knows of no reason why sai d 1 ands riay not
be consi dered for pl atti ng on the basi s of water servi ce frorn the
district.
Yours respectfully
VIq jb By : Kermi t M. P,udol f
Secretary
'lodel Irrigation District #18
cc Qob Toml inson 0~"✓~
Boa rd o f Directors
",odel I rri qati on Di stri c t. ~ l
• ~j ^ ~b A ' ) . ' n - ~ 4 ^ ~ ~ n ~ `
~ ~~,~A~ftf~~~ ~~~y~~~~
'.rIa7C~i'".ri ~ ~ll~/~f ~blTiKiT.~~~~yY ~ S~R{/~7VR r ' ' / ~ t • ~ ~~~~41I~~~i 7~.~~~IMC~- - ^"1'"i',~
f
c.
S4,ion ~ enginwer'-
, . CiVft ENlb1NEMS Q N0 lAPfD SURYEYORS
' Reghlered !n 'Wiadhin8ton and Idaho
' r • . _ r.
' TEWIfiOUD 726-1322
~ OiftCi X. 949 AlROOWM AD., SPOKARiB, VyA$H. 99206
, ~ . , „ , • , ,
, ' ' ; ' • ,'r
• A ' r r ~ '
' ~ • l ~
, , ~ , ~ ~ • .
" ~ ' r , ~ • ~ ~
~ , ~ 1 • i ~ ~ ' i ~ 1
/ ' , ~ r • , ' ' ~ • ~ ' ~ '
December 13, 1977 ~ . . .
,
~ -
, .
MLIlMINAR'Y PLAT A
~ MIDIIAME 1 8T ADDITY4N
~
IEGAL DESCRIPTION
. , ,
, ~ .
, • , , .
. ~
SE 1/4 SeCtion 33, T. 25 N. , R. 44 E.W.M. Spokane Couhty,
~ Waabingtvn, Except M18ilame adQition, Also Except R/'W
, for 32 n8. Ave., AlBO Except R f W for Pines Roe,d, 'Aleo , ~ ~ '
_ ' ' ~ ' • ~
F,xcept R/6,1 Por EowBish Road.
.
• ,
~ ~ ►
a~
. o ,
` • + ' a ' , I I. ~ • ~ 1 ~
E . ' ♦ . ' , , ~ o , `
~0
~ - y • ~ ~v ~
c • ,J'G!~ ..!e-fi~-~
Chaxles E. Simp on Y~
a ~
d`~~. <<
~ • r '•','~7G'~~`L~ f,.~
. i~
.
. . . v ~
, . . , ,
. . . . • .i
,
v
~
.
~~tl
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET
a
, _ _ • PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
- . . . . . ,r~. - • - -
$POKANE COUNTYGOURTHOUSE
MEMORANDUM
. ' P
'IU. Division of Engineering and Roads ' .
Division of Utilities
Division of Buildings - ~
Spokane County Health District
Fire Protection District No. 1
Model Irrigation District
FROM: Thomas Veljic, Planner I
DATE: May 19, 1992
SUBJECT: Revicw of Final Plat PE-1168-78 MIDILOME 7TH ADDITION
Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and
forward any comments by June 2, 1992. If you have any questions you may
contact Thomas Veljic at 456-2205.
Thank you.
sam
Enclosure
c: Midilome, Inc., 606 West Third Avenue, Spokane, WA 99204
, . ; R ECEIvE D
~ d
Nov 3 0 1992
92 1f 43 ;;rUlchivc vuuN1Y
NO. piAtVNiNG DEPARTMEAtT
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKANE COUNTY
1N TH.E VIATTER OF FILING TH.E FINAL PLAT OF )
MLDILOME 7TH ADDITION, Pr-1168-78, WITH )
, EXISTLNG URBAN RESIDENTIAL-3.5 (UR-3.5) ) R E S O L U T I O N
~ ZONING IN SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH, )
RANGE 44 EWM, SPOKANE COUNTY, )
WASHINGTON )
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE B4ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONFRS OF SPOKANE
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of Midilome 7th Addition, PE-1168-7$
that portion of the northeast quarter of Section 33, Townsllip 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M.,
Spokane County, Washington, described as follows:
Begin at the Southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 3 of MIDILOME 6TH A.DDITION, as recorded in
Volume 19 of Plats, page 90; thence South 89° 48' 55" East, along the South line of said Lot 8,
49.55 feet to the beginning of a cu,-ve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 435.00 feet;
thence southeasterly through a central angle of 26° 29' 33", an are distance of 201.14 feet; thence
South 26° 40' 38" West 155.67 feet to the South line of the Northeast quarter of Section 33;
thence North 89° 48' 55" West 1,075.37 feet; thence North 00° 11' OS" East 531.13 feet; thence
North 20° 49' 09" West 179.47 feet to the Southerly line of MIDILOME 1ST ADDITIQN as
rzcorded in Volume 15 of Plats, page 35; thence the next two courses and distances along said
line, North 76° 44' 08" East 176.25 feet; thence north 61° 37' 35" East 171.99 feet to the West
comer of Lot 1, Block 4 of MTDILOME 6TH ADDITION; thence the next eight courses and
distances along the Southerly line of MrDT.LOME 6TH ADDITION, South 37° 12' 21" East
220.26 feet: thence North 39° 00' 44" East 68.17 feet; thence South 57° 33' 34" East 127.86
feet; thence south 81° 16' 31 " East 54.20 feet; thence South 59° 33' 43" East 124.68 feet;
thence South 18° 06' 36" West 38.38 feet; thence South 87° 59' 39" East 205.48 feet; thc;nce
south 00° 26' OO" East 332.87 feet; to the Point of Beginning; Situate in the County of Spokanc,
State of Washington.
UPON TFIE RECOMMENDATION of the Spokane County Planning Department, the final plat is
approveci with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in ihis plat will not be
established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have
been irliprovcd to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County
Cummissioners.
ADDITIONALLY, until the final plat document is filed in the Spokane County Auditor's Office,
this subdivision has only preliminaiy plat status and is subject to expiraCion and null and void
status if not periodically granted an extension of time consistenC with the policies and procedures
of the Planning Department.
PASSED BY TI-iE BOARD Tf-IIS DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1992
,
130ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
-OF S KANF COUNTY, ~SHINGTON
,
Patricia A. Mum erso
Steven Hasson(/
John R. McBride
Ai-I'F_ST: I:L IAM E. DONA~ E ~ .
C rk of the Bo~..rd 1992
gy:
oix"c
~osanne Montague, Deputy erk r~~".,.." ~
KEV l/90 mo
~
4s~
I a
S p O K A N E y. C O U N T Y
_ ,
DEPARTMENT OF BUILUWGS ~ A DIVISION OF THE PUBL(C WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L. MANSON, C.B.O., DIRECTOR DENNIS M. SCOTT, P.E., DIRECTOR
TO: IOM V f- L-J I~ , Planning Departrnent
FRON1: Tom Davis, Code Compliance Coordinator
DATE: 21?dQ~ GOVNTY
p`ANN KG prPARTMENT
~ RE: File Number:
Address:
Our comments regarding the above are reflected in the marked box(es) below:
The applicant shall contaci the Department of Buildings ai the eariiest possible stage of designJdevetopment in order to be
F-I informed of code requirements administered/enforced by the department; e.g.. State Building Code Acx regulations such as
requirements for fire hydrantJflow, fire apparatus access roads, street address assignment, barrier-free regulations, energy code
regulations, and general coordination with other aspecis of projed implementation.
~ The issuance of a building permit by the Department of Buildings is required.
! Requirements of Fire District No. need to be saiisfied during the building peRnit process.
The applicant is advised that the privaie road shall be named and signed in accordance witfi the provisions of Spokane County
~ Road Standards. This condition may be waived in the event thai the Departrnent of Buildings determines addressing on tfie
privaie road is not acceptable. However, at such dme the Departrnent of Buildings feels the need for tfie road to become a
private, named road, the applicantJowner shall partiapate and cooperate in this process.
The required fire flow for any building or subdivision is determined by building size, type of construction and proximity of
exposures. Based on informadon presented to tfiis office regarding this subdivision, tfie minimum fire flow established by code
of 500 gallons per minute for 30 minutes is being required.
Hydrant distribution will be as follows: Residential Development(s). Fire hydrants shall be located ai roadway interseciions
~ wherever possible and the maximum average distance between them shall be no fufiter than 900 feet and these hydrants shall
be placed so no portion of the strucxures are in excess of 450 feet from a hydrant
F-I This department has not received verification tfiat the required water plan has been submitted and approved.
~ Before any building permits are issued, the water system shall be installed in accordance with tfie approved water plan.
Certificadon that the installation complies with the requirements of the plan shall be submitted to tfie Department of Buildings.
~ We have no requiremonts for this proposal - existing conditions.
KNo addiUonal comments.
Specific comments are as follows:
~
~
CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
WEST 1303 BROADWAY 0 SPOKANE, WASH[NGTON 99260-0550 ~(509) 456-3675
FAX (509) 456-4703
1
Sp KANE VALLEY FIRE DEPA ENT
Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE, WA 99206 o (509) 928-1700 • FAX (509) 927-2227 ~
Rod Tedrow
Chief
May 29, 1992
~~C'Ef
IWA Y 2 9 199?
Spokane County Planning SPoaq~
~ U
N. 721 Jefferson ~LANN'~G p~Pq0jyTrME
Spokane, Wa. 99260
Attn: Thomas Veljic
Re: Final Plat PE-1168-78 Midilome 7th Addition
This plat is approved as drawn.
This plat requires three new fire hydrants. The hydrant
shall be installed by an approved water plan submitted to us
prior to installation.
Sincerely,
, uv~~
V
~
Paul Chase
Inspector I
PC/bd
/
\
. ~ • ~~vd
TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSORANCE COMPANY
North 720 Argonne
Spokane, Washington 99212
Prepared For: Order No.: CD-164813M
TOMLINSON REAL ESTATE Certificate for Filing Proposed:
ATTN: BOB TOMLINSON MIDILOME 7TH ADDITION
' 400 S. JEFFERSON
cc: Simpson Engineers/Duane
cc: Spokane County Planning Dept. Charge: $125.00
cc: Spokane County Engineers Tax: 10.00
Total: $135.00
PLAT CERTIFICATE
Effective Date: May 4, 1992 at 8:00 a.m.
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of- the Spokane County
Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the office of the Clerk of the United
States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is
made for the purpose herein specif ied, and is not to be used as a basis for
closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount paid for this
certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit:
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 33, Township 25 North,
Range 44 E.W.M., described as follows:
Begin at the Southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 3 of MIDILOME 6TH
ADDITION, as recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, page 90; thence South
89°48'S5" East, along the South line of said Lot 8, 49.55 feet to the
beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 435.00
feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 26 ° 29' 33" , an arc
distance of 201.14 feet; thence South 26°40' 38" West 155.67 feet to the
South line of the Northeast quarter of Section 33; thence North
89 ° 48' S5" West 1,075.37 feet; thence North 00 ° 11' 05" East 531.13 feet;
thence North 20°49'09" West 179.89 feet to the Southerly line of
MIDILOME 1ST ADDITION as recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, page 35;
thence the next two courses and distances along said line, North
76°44'OS" East 176.53 feet; thence North 61°37'35" East 171.61 feet to
the West corner of Lot 1, Block 4 of MIDILOME 6TH ADDITION; thence the
next eight courses and distances along the Southerly line of MIDILOME
SIXTH ADDITION, South 37°12'21" East 220.61 feet; thence North
39°00'44" East 68.17 f eet; thence South 57°33'34" East 127.86 feet;
thence South 81°16'31" East 54.20 feet; thence South 59°33'34" East
124.68 feet; thence South 18°06'36" West 38.38 feet; thence South
87°59'39" East 205.48 feet; thence South 00°26'00" East 332.87 feet;
to the Point of Beginning;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
(continued)
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 2
VESTED IN:
EMMA S. HAWKINS, a widow ,
EYCEPTIONS:
l. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as
to Parcel No. 45335.9158.
2. PRELIMINARY ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT:
ESTIMATED AMOUNT: $
R.I.D. NO.: 452
LEVIED BY: County of Spokane
FOR:
FILED:
PARCEL NO.: 45335.9158
Lien attaches, as between seller and purchaser, 30 days after said
filed date.
3. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Emma S. Hawkins, a widow
PURCHASER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, his wife
DATED: April 25, 1975
RECORDED: December 3, 1975
RECORDING NO.: 7512030261
(Covers property herein described and other property)
Purchaser' s interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
4. CONTRACT OE SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, husband and wif e
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
Corporation
DATED: July 1, 1977
RECORDED: August 4, 1977
RECORDING NO.: 7708040308
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4. (continued)
. +
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 3
5. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, husband and wif e
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
corporation
DATED: December 1, 1978
RECORDED: September 10, 1979
RECORDING NO.: 7909100429
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
6. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, husband and wif e
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
corporation
DATED: March 1, 1980
RECORDED: April 13, 1981
RECORDING N0.: 8104130146
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Installing operating, maintaining,
altering and repairing a sanitary
sewer system
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
DATED: February 25, 1986
RECORDED: March 4, 1986
RECORDING NO.: 8603040234
(continued)
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 4
8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Construction, installation,
operations, maintenance and repair
of public utilities, signs and road
maintenance installed or in the
' future installed in the Easement
area, right of ingress and egress
AREA AEFECTED: The South 35.00 feet of the NE1/4 of
• Section 33; Except the SE1/4 of the
SE1 / 4 of the NE1 / 4
DATED: December 2, 1991
RECORDED: December 3, 1991
RECORDING NO.: 9112030221
9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Construction, installation,
operations, maintenance and repair
of public utilities, signs and road
maintenance installed or in the
. future installed in the Easement
area, right of ingress and egress
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
DATED: December 2, 1991
RECORDED: December 3, 1991
RECORDING NO.: 9112030222
10. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility
Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458-2538.
In order to make payment, account number is necessary.
• TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
B c ~ , A
y
Connie Dodge, Title Offi~er
For Service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222
~
° Date 5/13/92 Page 1
TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
• NORTH 720 ARGONNE SPOKANE. WA 99212 Phone: (509) 922 - 2222
I N V 0 I C E
TOMLINSON REAL ESTATE SERVICES
S. 400 JEFFERSON 8388100
SUITE 333
SPOKANE, WA 99204
Attentlon of: BOB TOMLINSON
Order Number: 164813 Customer References MIDILOME 7TH ADD
Title Officer: CONNIE DODGE
Property Desc: PTN 33-25-44 Buyer:
, Seller: .
Date Descriptfon , Detail Liability Amount
5/13/92 PLAT CERTIFICATE 125.00
5I13/92 SALES TAX . 10.00
Invoice Total: 135.00*
FIN: 94-0386820 '
. . - ~ •>td
rA
~D 4-
~
J TRANAiif/~ICA TITLE INSURA(JCE COMPANI
2D
I s sketchavidsd, "dthout charge, for your
, rmation , not intended to shaw al1 matte ~ i G
ted to th ; psrty ;ncltiding, but not limited
'
area, dimonsions, ezsements, encroachmentstr , ~I
y _ tidn of boundaries. It is not part of, nor does MIDILOME 3~D I~
odify, the commitment or pcli
~ ched. •7he Company assume NO LIAB{LIIY,for any ; .t'' •
er,fe~a t his sketch. Re rence should tie • ~ , ~ ' ~d
etoanate surveyfor t tner intormation.
. ~ • ~ ~ '~~H~';~>~~ ~
',r r~ r : ~`~'3~r"•;~:b.;~r V
~ ~ ~
M • ' ~ ~ - ~ ~~-~4.' ; i ~ T v ~
•LJ ~a f ~ ~ ~ ,rl~~' 1~[' `
A NA 014
~ ~D~ , ,;p~ ~,~~•y;. , , ~ ~.,~i5, I ll' ` t,~`, i?df~~'a ` Q
: 6~ ~ . "~?~".~r.:~, ~ • 4M, ~ ,i.
, ~rYSIY~'i ~ y ~ ' : 0.t••~~~ 4 ~ ~ Q
1~~~~ - ;.i■r~:. ' ~ , . . ~ ~ O
i ~ , ~ ~ ; . ~ 4
~ ~ . • ~`~•=fi~ ' ~ ~ ~ ; ~
. ; , ~ ' . ~ t.,.i `c' }v:j; ~1` • •
v ~
. • . ,'r' ',l'`r~~ ~~~k~~~~~ ~
I . ~.~:~'t" •.'✓~1. ' ' ~ , + ~ai~+~~/~ 0. '~r~~±? • ` ~ ~
~ ~ ~ :~i! . ~ , . ' Mti.n ~ .
, f ' ! ~ ~ r ' _ . . ` .
a
'~';:,~w ~ ~ i~~
~ • , • fi D
, .Y~,.:..ta.:
MARE. 2~.N
rj44•;C
@'~!1' ' , • a.;"r., ' ~
~
, . is
6
~ , ~ .~.~~'•,e• ,
ii; • ~ ~'~,,.i. . 5~
" ~ ` ` . ~,`f~' ~,•~r'~: r
I~ Z~ ~~~~'yM. ~~d' • ~ • , ''1'
i
•~k~ r ~\,l' . ~ ~
♦
d
~ ti5 . -
,5,
' A 7 ~,J~! •
• M ~+t.1e h ~ _ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t/
1.INI~rV ,~"6C ~ + .
~ t~, ~ ~ ~ • • ' y~!
. . H . F. F~ , . , . .
~ TRANSAMERICA TI`t'LE INSORANCE COMPANY
~
North 720 Argonne
~ .
~vSpokane, Washington 99212
rTM'-
Prepared For: Order No.: CD-164813M
TOMLINSON REAL ESTATE Certificate for Filing Proposed:
ATTN: BOB TOMLINSON MIDILOME 7TH ADDITION
400 S. JEEFERSOV
cc: Simpson Engineers/Duane
cc: Spokane County Planning Dept. Charge: $125.00
cc: Spok3ne County Engineers Tax: 10.00
Total: $135.00
PLAT CERTIFICATE
Effective Date: May 4, 1992 at 5:00 a.m.
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of the Spokane County
Auditor' s and Clerk' s of f ices , and the of f ice of the Clerk of the United
States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is
made for the purpose herein sLoecified, and is not to be used as a basis for
closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount paid for this
certif icate . From such examination, the company hereby certif ies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit:
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 33, Township 25 North,
Range 44 E.W.NI., described as follows:
Begin at the Southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 3 of MIDILOME 6TH
ADDITION, as recorded in Volume 19 0f Plats, page 90; thence South
89°48'S5" East, along the South line of said Lot 8, 49.55 feet to the
beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 435.00
feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 26 ° 29' 33" , an arc
distance of 201.14 feet; thence South 26°40' 38" West 155.67 feet to the
South line of the Northeast quarter of Section 33; thence North
89°48'S5" West 1,075.37 feet; thence North 00°11'05" East 531.13 feet;
thence North 20°49'09" West 179.89 feet to the Southerly line of
NIIDILOME 1ST ADDITION as recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, page 35;
thence the next two courses and distances along said line, North .
76°44'08" East 176.53 feet; thence North 61°37'35" East 171.61 feet to
the West corner of Lot 1, Block 4 of r1IDILOME 6'rH ADDITION; thence the
next eight courses and distances along the South-erly line of MIDILO~IE
SIXTH ADDITION, South 37°12'21" East '20.61 f'~et; thence North
39000' 44" East 68.17 feet; thence South"5"7`33' 34-"~; East 127.86 feet;
thence South 81°16'31" East 54.20 feet; t~enc_e-South 59 33 34 East
124.68 feet; thence South 18°06'36" West 38.38 feet; thence South
87°59'39" East 205.48 feet; thence South 00°26'00" East 332.87 feet;
to the Point of Beginning;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
(continued)
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 2
VESTED IN: -
EMM-4 S. HAWKINS, a widow ,
EXCEPTIONS:
l. TaYes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as
to Parcel No. 45335.9158.
2. PRELIMINARY ESTIMAmED ASSESSMENT:
ESTIMATED AhlOUNT : $
R.I.D. NO.: 452
LEVIED BY: County of Spokane
FOR: -
FILED:
PARCEL NO.: 45335.9158
Lien attaches, as between seller and purchaser, 30 days after said
filed date.
3. CONTRACT OF SAL,E AND THE TERMS AND CONDTTIONS THEREOF:
- SELLER: Emma S. Hawkins, a widow .
~ PURCHASER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, his wife
DATED: April 25, 1975
RECORDED: December 3, 1975
RECORDING NO.: 7512030261
(Covers property herein described and other property)
Purchaser' s interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
4. CONTRACT OF SALE ANn THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Edgar IIueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, husband and wife
PURCHASFR: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
Corporation
DATED: July l, 1977
RECORDED: August 4, 1977
RECO[tDXNG NO.: 7708040308
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4. (continued)
. ~ • •
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 3
5. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueachke, husband and wif e
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
corporation
DATED: December 1, 1978
RECORDED: September 10, 1979
RECORDING NO.: 7909100429
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. nueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
6. CONTRACT OE SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOE':
SELLER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, husband and wife
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
corporation
DATED: March 1, 1980
REC4RDED: April 13, 1981 .
RECORDING NO.: 8104130146
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
7. EASEMENT AND THE TERM5 AND CONDITIONS THEREOE:
GRANTEE: Spokane County PURPOSE: Installing operating, maintaining,
altering and repairing a sanitary
sewer system
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
DATED: February 25, 1986
RECORDED: March 4, 1986
RECORDING NO.: 8603040234
(continued)
.
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 4
8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Construction, installation,
operations, maintenance and repair
of public utilities, signs and road
maintenance installed or in the
future installed in the Easement
area, right of ingress and egress
AREA AFFECTED : The South 35 . 0 0 f eet of the NE1 / 4 of
Section 33; Except the SE1/4 of the
SE1/4 of the NE1/4
DATED: December 2, 1991
RECORDED: December 3, 1991
RECORDING NO.: 9112030221
9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Construction, instal lation,
operations, maintenance and repair
of public utilities, signs and road
maintenance installed or in the
. f uture installed in the Easement
area, right of ingress and egress
AREA AECECTED: This and other property
DATED: December 2, 1991
RECORDED: December 3, 1991
RECORDING NO.: 9112030222
10. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility
Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458-2538.
In order to make payment, account number is necessary.
TRANSAMERICA TTTLE INSURANCE COMPANY
- N~~j BY Lq-~ A'U~ 0, Y
Connie Dodge, 'ritle Of'f i~e`r
For Service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222
r U.~ ~ ~•r-.~; ~r~,~,,~v~r~~R~~:~{'~',~ i~ , ~ ,:i~;~~
~ ^~e~1..;~,'~i:.~1~ ~c~S ~,~,r~`t
~ r~y ~ ~ 1-~M♦ ~~i~ ,:~~n' . . .',~:~.~n~~ +1J/• ~ DD ~
.l~♦ ~ ~ . t~' ~~f~+i ~ ~
~ L.~~..Cr' ~
I TRAWJQICA T17LE INSUflANCE COMPAN`l ;
7D .
'l S SkelCF, ~vid::d, K~ihc7ut chargo, (0r yOUr ~~oti,. ` I
f101 It1I°flLi^CI fo SI101V 3II fi1dll@? 4k
fR18t10n ~ . IV
~
eited ro t41 rartY including, but not limited "r-
ea, dimensior.s, Eas~mPnts, encroachmentsr
E ~ RV r
tidn of bour~daries. li is not p2rt of, nor does j• MIDILOMD-`1_"Y_: odify, the comrnitment or pc{i ' ~e~il `F , . ~
sume "~0 LI Y ' y~.'•~~
~ t ched. ~ The Company as Aa~~n for an
~ er;re~a lbrlttthis skatch. Re~rence Shauld be
•.f . ~-~:E,•~.. •
~ . e'to enate survay for ft ther informatian.
~ • . :3"~'~•.
r4
JqA 0
~c `'a~ ~ . 'r'„~:: OP,~
Oy7! ~ r. re.~l~ ~ ~ •;J~,~~:}~',,'~+~1.Crr ~
4• y Ii ~`;.J : ~ ~ • ~ " ' • • r ~ O
• ~ ~r'CI p y' 1 ' ~ . 1 • ~i
~7~...~ ~
A pp
• ' I
. ~ g~ It» 't: ~ ~ J ' ~ ~ ~ ~ '.Y~•' ~ ~
,tit~ • ~ ~
• . • ~ Y ~ i. ~ W.~'~~~'4r y,J.l'r ~ ~ .
~ t ' • . s,~ ' " ~ ~ ~,~ht. .'d~~ ~ ~M
' 'D~, . . . . ~ . . .
~ x R'~i~~' •1 ~ . r . ~
~fiiDICDlyfE ~ v ,
~ :~.~~-r: ~
'
• '1,* yt ~•I , i~ + •~i'
, ~ ~i'~ i ~ 0. t .
MA.R{E. ~ 2~'~
' . . .1 _ 4,.:',. ' :,-4'•
H'.: , ~ • ~ ~ l ~r~'~ .
~
M ; ,1 ; . ~ V 'G♦C~ ~ i .
W,
• ~ r
~
somp
'p~p rlwe~~
.~f1 ~1,r r I w , ~,~j~. ,i •
~ ,
3
; •.,;~L' . :1 ` .
` • ~.Fr ~ r"rC'r . . ^ ~ ~ ~
y~i~''~~ ,~s~ 1
' ~ ~ ~~~r . V
~sl • - , _ 1 r
~
. 3
` , •-FFi~ . . .
. ~ , .
Date 5/13/92 Page 1
TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
NOATN 720 ARGONNE
SPOKANE, WA 99212 Phones (509) 922 - 2222
I N V 0 I C E
TOMLINSON REAL ESTATE SERVICES
S. 400 JEFFERSON 8388100
SUITE 333
S,POKANE, WA 99204 Attentlon ofs BOB TOMLINSON
Order Number: 164813 Customer Reference: MIDILOME 7TH AOD
Title Officer: CONNIE DODGE
property Desc: PTN 33-25-44 Buyer:
• Seller: .
Date Descrlptlon , Detail Liability Amount
5/13/92 PLAT CERTIFICATE 125.00
5/13/92 SALES TAX . 10.00
Invoice Total: 135.00*
FIN: 94-0386620 '
RECEIVEQ
a
, MAY 2 8 1992
~
SPOKANE COUNTY
RTMENT
S P O K A N E r ' o~,- C O U N T
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
William R. Dobratz, P.E., Director Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director
M E M O R A N D U M
************************************~~r~r~*********~***************
****************~**********************~r*************************
TO: Thomas Veljic, Planning Department
FROM: Bill Wedlake, Utilities Department
DATE: May 26, 1992
RE: Review of Final Plat PE-1168-78
Midilome 7th Addition
The plans for this proj ect are currently under initial review. The
Utilities Department is not ready for finalization of the plat at
thi's time.
N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260-0180 (509) 456-3604 FAX (509) 456-4715
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter-office Communication
DATE: June 9, 1992
T0: Thomas Veljic, Planner I, Spolcane County Planning Dept.
FROM: Steven P. Holder R.S. - Envir
y, , o n ent a l H e a l t h D i v i sio n, S C H D.
SUBJECT: Review of Fina1 Plat PE-1168-78 Midilome 7th Addition
All Health District conditions have been satisfied by the sponsor of this plat.
0779P/ps
N3- ''`°dd
SN/NAd
~y Q
Zsu~ .S+ 1
V,3A1.jj0.jjh(
~ ~ sPoKArrE co'UNx~ PL.A.NNzNG DrpARTn~ENT .
` 721 HORxx ,~EFFERSON STREET, SPOKA.NE, WA 99260 . .
DA.TE:
FZi`IA.L PX,A.VSHOR`Z' PLA.'Z'IJ3SP REVXEW PLAT NO.: 91' ~
I'L A.T/B SP NA.ME : /yIt 0Q,0^--t
ZN OUT SY.JBMZTTA.X, REOUXREN1EN'X'S
'-00, 1. Nine (9) copies of the proposed final plat uith dedication. Parcel No. .
~ 2. Thzee (3) copies of the finai pl.ar cez-ti_f~-xcate (not older than six months of
anticipated fiLing date.)
3. Pxoper[y outlined in red on a cunrent Spokane County Assessor's Map(s), with.
suzveyoz's stamp of assurance.
4. A.n approved Water Plan or lettez of water System adequacy from BuiIding & .
Safety Departrnent, water purveyor, fire dist7-i.cc, Health District, etc.
5. Lettez-s of easement acceptazace fxom utility pu.rveyozs:
A.) Phone
B ) Water
C) Gas
D) ElECtncxty
E) Sewer 6. Cuzrent review fee of $ R.eceipt No.:
7. County Treasurez- - taxes pai.d? (Requiz-ed befoze J3oard sign-off.)
Detailed landscape plan with bond co construct (if applzcable), for PUD's ,
especialiy.
DEPA.~.2TIYZENTAL RE'YZEW A.NIp COMNZENTS
Health Disfirict Date:
Engineer's Off~ce Date:
tTtihties Departrnent v N0'" Date:
Building & Safety Department 0 A, . . TJate: Water Purveyor Date:
Sewer. Purveyoz TJate:
Fue Di.strict w• Uate:
CHECKED
PLANNXNG REVXEW COMNZEN"z'S B Y , llATE
1. Maps circulated to: Build.ing & Safefiy , sewer purveyor
Engineer's office , Health Uiscrict , Utiltizs ~
2. Final plat X.ezoyed and/or le ble ~
3. Subd:tvxsion name~~l~.' Section 33,
Township AS!% Range Vy' ~
4. Notarized signature of Vilashington-zegistered surveyor
5. Sheet size: 24" x 36" for plat/BSP and 18" x 24" for short plat Z
b. North azrow and scale (I" = 50' 1" - 10', 1." = 200')
~
7. Bold boundary lin e of plat/}3 S P
8. Location and width of proposed streets, rights-of-way, easements)
~ open space; xndlcate 1-foot stnps
9 . S txeet narne(s) 7-%/
10. Check lot sizes compatible with plat approval and 7,oning 7/
pzdinance/Code .
PAGE J. of 2
.I .
, ~ . ' .
. - .
` CHECKED
. pLA.NNXNG REV7E'4'Y COMNZENTS, CONTZNUEU BY DATE
1.1. Appzopziate frontage/setback per zone standards at bui.tding lin.e
ior cul-de-sac lots
12. Layout, lot and block numbers, dunensions of Iots and area of lot
13. Check declicati.on for condi:tions of pzelimin ary plat approval.
. 14. Check restrictive covenants for Oxdzxiance conflicts ✓1~l il ~
15. Number and type of units with condztions of approval
~
16. L.andscape plan confozms to approval (PUD)
17. Check PCJD setbacks/fencing
18. Check easements, clouds on propezty, etc., fzom ceztif~cate to
. plat 19. Check foz compliance wj.th Shorelines Management A.ct 20. E~.sting zoning is changed to
21. Taxes paid? .
. 22. Legal description proofed (title zeport to dedication)
23. Review comments to sponsor/surveyor
24. Propez forrnat for sheet setup
25. BOCC Resolution typed and proafed
C MENTS:
1- s~u ~ s~..~ ~+..~..a'`
~ •d-*,,.,
3
6
~
-72,_~~ ~
~
Ar7 .
~ C~~~... X_-Ir .
v = - -
~
~
, . .
. ,
REV.1/90:fcu
PAGE 2 0f 2
. . ~ - - + -
. .
O
CO
7.'RANSAMERICA TITLE INSORANCE COMPANY
North 720 Argonne
Spokane, Washington 99212
Prepared For: Order No.: CD-164813M
TOMLINSON REAL ESTATE Certificate for Filing Proposed:
ATTN: BOB TOMLINSON MZDILOME 7TH ADDITION
400 S. JEEEERSON
cc: Simpson Engineers/Duane
cc: Spokane County Planning Dept. Charge: $125.00
cc: Spokane County Engineers Tax: 10.00
Total: $135.00
PL1aT CERTIFICATE
Eff ective Uate: rlay 4, 1992 at 8:00 a.m.
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of the Spokane County
Auditor's and Clerk's offices, and the office of the Clerk of the United
States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is
made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for
closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount paid for this
certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title
to the folloc,ring described land, in said Spokane County, to wit:
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 33, Township 25 North,
Range 44 E.W.M., described as follows:
Begin at the Southwest corner of Lot 8, Block 3 of MIDILOME 6TH
ADDITION, as recorded in Volume 19 of Plats, page 90; thence South
89°48'55" East, along the South line of said Lot 8, 49.55 feet to the
beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest with a radius of 435.00
feet; thence Southeasterly through a central angle of 26 ° 29' 33" , an arc
distance of 201.14 feet; thence South 26°40' 38" West 155.67 feet to the
South line of the Northeast quarter of Section 33; thence North
89°48'S5" West 1,075.37 leet; thence North 00°11'05" East 531.13 feet;
thence North 20°49'09" West 179.89 feet to the Southerly line of
MIDILOME 1ST ADDITION as recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, page 35;
thence the next two courses and distances along said line, North
76°44'OS" East 176.53 feet; thence North 61°37'35" East•171.61 feet to
the West corner of Lot 1, Block 4 of MIDILOME 6TH ADDITION; thence the
nzxt eight courses and distances along the Southerly line of MIDILOME
SIXTH ADDITION, South 37°12'21" East 220.61 feet; thence North
39°00'44" East 68.17 feet; thence South 57°33'34" East 127.86 feet;
thence South 81°16'31" East 54.20 feet; thence South 59°33'34" East
124.68 feet; thence South '18°06'36" West 38.38 feet; thence South
87°59'39" East 205.48 feet; thence South 00°26'00" East 332.87 feet;
to the Point of Beginning;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
. (continued)
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 2
VESTED IN:
EMNlA S. H~tVKINS, a widow
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Ta.ces and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as
to Parcel No. 45335.9158.
2. PRELIMINARY ESZ'IMATED ASSESSMENT:
ESTIMATED ACIOUNT : $
R.I.D. NO.: 452
LEVIED BY: County of Spokane
FOR:
FILED:
PARCEL NO.: 45335.9158
Lien attaches, as between seller and purchaser, 30 days after said
.Eiled date.
3. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITxONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Emma S. Hawkins, a widow
PURCHASER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E. Bueschke, his wife
DATED: April 25, 1975
RECORDED: December 3, 1.975
RECORDING NO.: 7512030261
(Covers property herein described and other property)
Purchaser's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
4. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOE :
SELLER: Edgar IIueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, husband and wife
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
Corporation
DATED: July 1, 1977
RECORDED: August 4, 1977
RECORDING NO.: 7708040308
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's intErest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4. (continued)
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 3
5. CONTRACT OE SALE AND THE TERNIS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Edgar Bueschke -and Louise E.
nueschke, husband and wif e
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
corporation
DATED: December 1, 1978
RECORDED: September.10, 1979
RECORDING NO.: 7909100429
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
6. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, husband and wif e
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
corporation
DATED: March 1, 1980
RECORDED: April 13, 1961
RECORDING NO.: 8104130146
(Covers portion of property herein described and other property)
Seller's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Bueschke, as 'tenants in common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause
No. 84302158-4.
7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF :
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Installing operating, maintaining,
altering and repairing a sanitary
sewer system
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
DA'rED: February 25, 1986
RECORDED: March 4, 1986
RECORDTNG NO.: 8603040234
(continued) -
Order No.: CD-164813
Page No.: 4
8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOE:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Construction, instal lation,
operations, maintenance and repair
of public utilities, signs and road
maintenance installed or in the
future installed in the Easement
area, right of ingress and egress
AREA AFFECTED : The South 35 . 00 f eet of the NE1 / 4 of
Section 33; Except the SE1/4 of the
SE1/4 of the NE1/4
DATED: December 2, 1991
RECORDED: December 3, 1991
RECORDING NO.: 9112030221
9. EASEMk;NT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GHANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Construction, installation,
operations, maintenance and repair
of public utilities, signs and road
maintenance installed or in the
f uture installed in the Easement
area, right of ingress and egress
AREA AFEECTED: This and other property
DATED: December 2, 1991
RECORDED: December 3, 1991
RECORDING NO.: 9112030222
10. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility
Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458-2538.
In order to make payment, account number is necessary.
• TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
B
Y .c~
Connie Dodge, Title Otfi~er
For Service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222
~ .
r • ~'e~+ Z.r,• .vV.+. yt;~ ,~,:p~r ..t . . i~
~ i J`~~. ~ . . : ~ rr`'~`~~~'i~ f r,• r • ~
~ ~r, , ~ . • ~ ~
~
1
I TRAN; li' .ICA TITLE INSUFiAWCE COPAPAN'
~ ~
vidnd, vAihout charae, for your
s sketch
M ~ i• +•,~~p ~ .
rmation not intendcd to show ali mattere 00 4
, ~ `
F hL n°ft includin(7, but not Eimited .
ited t0 tr Y a ~
•~;+~t~::~' r,
r
~3 area, dimensions, easemenss, encroachments,
t f ~\M
. tidn of houndaries. It is not p2rt of, nor daes ~ . MIDLOME 3 RD
odify, the commitment or poli~ i~i1 ~ . /
yi ;,,_~,i:ti'~•. C/ ,
• i ched. -The Company assume VO LIABW71' for any . •
rence should be
er~q(a t this slcaith. Ret
~
' e'to anate survey for fi ther information. 'e. 4CJ
: . ~ ~~~M ~T • ~
r{ A't'1
. i7 - ~ ~ `
MA ..i•: a ` ~ r4
A40
~ ~ .,~~y~,'}~'•i+.:- " ~ Q
. ~J~~i~f ~ ' .~r. :+•~~'~,~,r'-r.':1'~~ O
14117
~ a r " ' ~ , ~~1'~.~~. . • ~ _ ~
. , . . . , y'~`',~;.' ,r„ ~ .~-a ~ ~ , ♦ .
. . r.. . ~ . `-~,:Fr"i;`l~~r"a'~ ~ + ' /
`^s' ~ ~ . : ~ ~
_l~.cs..~~;• . • , ~ ~ ~t.l
'11. _ ~ ' ~p~ ~.1.1)fw ~ ~ ~ ~
♦ •G'f ' ~ . . . ' C~_.~~,'f'!'~~; \
Q
~~I' 7 t . ~ • ~
. . • .-~:~iT ~ „ . + .j.~ ~ .
. •r~i~.:P;.i :~/ti~ , _ 1~-,!~4Tp.."K~
• . Qp
MARE. 2 N
• . . . ' , "~;;:r,~,
tt r ~ . h>
n ` . • ~ ' ~ "'°,~r'
' . r f . .
' ~E
Y~ .o.ej.•~
1 v,•.~ L2. .f`,
i ~ ~ , . ~'•t;i; , ,y„M~"- • ,A'~.
!F t6:'~ +C►i}+i~ -J.`~ ~ ~ i i ~
.
.J'd'~'
i~t~'~ Lr
7~) : M ~`..S're~;.:~ ~ I ~~~:.ir: .i• t
`j~b "~~w,;~: ~ . ' ;1 ~ . .
415 9'2-7
V
~ : . • ~ ~ ~ i1
, ~ f~''~'-' :,l r ' I"/~ . ✓ ' ~ , ' i
1
4 ~
•TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSUAANCE COMPANY Date 5/13/92 Page 1
NORTH 720 ARGOPINE SPOKANE. WA 99212 Phone: (509) 922 - 2222
I N V 0 1 C E
TOMLINSON REAL ESTATE SERVICES
S. 400 JEFFERSON 8388100
SUITE 333
SPOKANE, WA 99204
Attention of: BOB TOMLINSON
Order Number: 164813 Customer Reterence: MIDILOME 7TH A00
Title Officer: CONNIE DODGE
Property Desc: PTN 33-25-44 Buyer:
• Seller: .
Date Description . Detall Liabillty Amount
5/13/92 PLAT CER7IFICATE 125.00
5/13/92 SALES TAX . 10.00
invoice Totaic 135.00"
FIN: 94-0386820 '
f
► ~ ~f N~' , ~ ti ~J
C,• i•
:
93 1125 `
NO.
.~t9
r J'
BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKAN13'/,C~~N.TY`9~'
cr?~. ,r
IN THE MAT7'ER OF FTL1NG TH.E ) Y
' FINAi, PLAT OF MIDILOi~~.E 8TH ADDITION, )
PE-1 168-7$, AND ZONE RECLASST-FICATION, )
7N- 13-78, FROM URBAN RESrDENTIt1L-3.5 }
(Uk-3.5) TO URBAN RESZDENT1AL-3.5 ) R E S O L U T I O N
(UR-3.5) ZONING IN SECTION 33, ) -
TOWNSHIP 25 N., RANGE 44 E.W.M., )
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ) .
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE
COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of Midilome 8th Addiaon
being that portion of the northeast 1/4 of Section 33, Township 25 North, Range 44 r.W.M.,
Spokane County, Washington, described as follows:
Begin at a point on the South line of said Nonheast quarter, 20.00 feet East of the Vvest line of
Said Northeast quarter, said point being on the Fast right of way line of Bowdish Road, thence
North 00° 06' 10" West, along said East Ribht of Way, 662.23 feet to the South line of
.MIDII.4ME ADDITION projected, as recorded in Book 13 of Plats, page 18; thence South 89°
47' 00" East, along said South line, 370.00 feet to the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 8,
Midilome 1 st Addition, as recorded In Book 15 of Plats, page 35; thence, the next 3 courses
along the South line of said lst Addition thence North 79° 17' 00" East 117.58 feet; thence Nortti
8$° 15' 53" East 147.82 feet; thence North 77° OS' 31" East 41.$3 feet co thc Nlorthwest corner of
Lot l, Block 3, Midilome 7th Addition, as rccorded irl Book 20 of Placs, page 92; thence, the
next 2 courses along the West line of said 7th Addition, South 20° 49' Uy" East 179.47 feet;
chence South 00° 1 l' OS" West 531.13 feet to the South line of said Northeast quarter; thence
North 89° 48' 55" West 734.95 feet to the Poi»t of Beginning;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of VVashington.
UPON THE RECOMMENDATION of the Spokane County Planning Department, the final plat is
approved, with existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zoning with the exception that the public
righcs of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the
County Engineer has certifieti that the roads have been improved to County standards and
approved by a separate resolution of the Boaxd of County Commissioners.
ADDITIONALLY, until the final plat document is filed in the Spokane County Auditor's Office,
this subdivision has only preliminary plat status and is subject to expiration and null and void
• status if not periodically granted an extension of titi-ie consistent with the policies and proc:edures
of the Planning Depairtment.
PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS ~ DAY OF SEPTEivI13ER, 1993.
BOAR:D OF COUNTY COMUI.ISSION'ERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
,
%
Parricia A. iVIu hai erson
. /
Hasson
~ D. E. Chil g A'ITEST: WII~ IA E. DONAHUE
erk the Board
By: _ J
Ros~ ne Montnue, Deputy Clcrk
~ ~
. ,
►
. I
q4
i
~
i
S P O K A N E o C O U N' T Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. HUBBARD, DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Division of Engineering and Roads
Division of Utilities
Department of Buildings
Spokane County Health District
Fire Protection District No. 1
Model Imgation District
FROM: Thomas Veljic, Planner I ~1
DATE: May 5, 1993
SUBJECT: Review of Final Plat PE-1168-78 NTIDILOME 8TH ADDI'TION
Enclosed find copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any
comments by May 19,1993. If you have any questions you may contact Thomas Veljic
at 456-2205.
Thank you.
sam
Enclosure
c: Simpson Engineers, 909 North Argonne Road, Spokane, WA 99212
WEST 1026 BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0240 •(509) 456-2205
0 1 ~
6impson Engineers, nc.
CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
N. 909 Argonne Road • Spokane, WA 99212
, (509) 926-1322 ~ Fax: 926-1323
,
TO : c o olt--N-r- Y ?LA t-M1. IWG`
SUBJECT: ~•n~a~~...oME. 8T~ A.oo,
DATE:
p-F -LLi~ pLs.-E-
C.. r S_ a.~ a.,.. ~ u~ l. l.. P ~ c~y--~i ~1 G~~ Q.
V v
~
~ ~ -
Signed _
.
TRANSAMERICA'TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~~~~~3 7 2 0 NORTH ARGONNE ROAD
SpOon cot;o-+1t SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212
pEPAR~~,~EN~ (509) 922-2222/FAX 926-1519
PLa
' TRANSAMERICA NO.: CD-171856
PREPARED FOR: RE: BUESCHKE/GUSTIN .
SIMPSON ENGINEERS
909 N. ARGONNE G~
SUPPLEMENTAL TITLE COMMITMENT NUMIIER 1
ATTENTION: This Supplemental contains changes whzch impact title to
property set forth in the above-ref erenced comrnitment.
S C H E D U L E "B" :
X Paragraph No. 7 has been added as follows:
7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Inland Power & Light Co., a
Washington corporation
PURPOSE: Electric transmission and
distribution facilities and
appurtenances; with right cut, trim
or chemically treat trees and
shrubbery and to stack logs in
accordance with REA specifications
(20 feet with right of ingress and
egress
AREA AEEECTED: N.E 1/4
DATED: March 2, 1993
RECORDED: August 23, 1993 .
RECORDING NO.: 9308230354
X There has been no change in the title to the property covered by this
order since January 25, 1993, EXCEPT the matters noted hereinabove.
Dated as of August 31, 1993 at 8:00 A.M.
TRANSAMERICA TITIE INSURANCE COMPANY
B y ~r~P ♦ ~P a ~
! C✓onnie Dodge, Tvtle Officer
kk 1
1 l'.:1JL'1 • . , ' . • .n. 7 , • . , , , , •
It I L:1N 1 , ' . ' ..l•.. ,'r' . t, ,
ne. W~ 99202 J
~o reet) ~ . . . . . . , , , , . -
KN(nV AL6 FIEN BY TNESE PRESENTS, Ihat ihe undenigned (hcrcini(ler callcd "Gnntor"), • ' • , . ' ' ' ' , . , (I~/ ~w. ' , , . . ,;i',!, ,',,''~r,• ' ,',.`'Y •;`i: . , , .
't . • ' . .
for mulud alfunin6 bcncfils Which irc harcCq +cltnwled6eJ. da Aercby comrcy aiu1 gram tn INI.AND POWER h UGHT CQ, ~ . . " ' .1; , ' . • ' . . .
lthshington corponiion (hercinafur calicd "Cnace") and la iit sutteswn ur uiigns, the rigAi. privilcgc nrul AuiAoriiy, 10 insul~. ; . . . • . ..~~i ' • . . , . . • . • • ' ' . .
rtintiull, canserua, crai, aItet, rcph+u, rcp+ir, eeergiu, openit aM1 nuinmm dtcine iNntmiµion mJ diiinpuiion fan6ties, con• •
sititing of polts, <abla, wiras arx1 ull aher ixcessaty at rmvcnirnt appunenmces, to make uid fuiliiiee an mugraiel elecuie syiicrn
onJ in conneciion wiib aU iAe foregoing to cul mJ trim trees md shrublxrr ynd cut down from time io Itme 311 daJ, wr-ak, ianing
a Jangcrai Irca iAat arc iall cnough to sinke the Wias in fAlliog, to chip anJ sprcaJ br2nches anJ oiher foliage inJ io pile and , , • ~ CIAAENCE E. SIA4PSON
fuck ing% u nectsury dongiide the tlartd rigM-0Gw3r in icconlance with REA specificaiionf (20 (ecq eo fhe talem necepary w 1901-1987
insullanJmamuinuiJeleclrite}ntemwAiclitroGelaaieJupon,unJer,mYtanJacrnseiAefollawing-JescriDrJlanJf2ndpamnrs impson Engineers,InC. RlCHAAOI.$IMPSON
simaad in iAe county of S p~ swtc or \,&r..o~~r 2nd morc CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LANO SURVEYORS • CHAfiIES E. SIhIPSON
pinicularly dcxribcd a (ollow+:
lxanceC in Washirrgfon and idafro
N. 909 Argonne Aaad Spokane, WA 99212 C r) ~
J FAGE ~ .
• q~~ ' (509) 926-1322 Fa~c: 926•1323 !
Pl E Eu.w 1 a~ u~NX
D.W ~ ~ 19 CJ , ~ ~1
. PROPERTY DESCRlPTION
Tugeiher wuh IAt right uaII iimts ro Gnnree, iit sucteswn anJ usigns, o( ingrets w, md cgreis from sjid larxls, xrois Grimor i '
adj:+cent IAnds and io ux any mJ all roaJs af the Grnnior for the purpuu uf iroialiing, cnnsuw7mq, oltennE, rrpiu,ing, rrpjiring, . WDlLOl+IE $TH ADOITIQN
cncrghing, openiing fnd rtuinuining saiJ elettrie sysicm, and the right aI any ome tu rtmwc all or anp pan ot SaiJ dcnric sysirm
I'wm saiJ iand. ' '1btt porGOa Of dte NE 114 o(Sacooa 73, T. 25 N., R 34 E.W.M. des:ribe+1 u(o!lown:
The urnltnigned Gramor conanants anJ ogrta ilwl no burier, siruaurc or buiWing shall be plucJ wiihin the righaoGw2r gromeJ
by ihis cuumem wi+Aout the cxprcu wriuen consem of the Gramee. , &gin u t paine oo the SawA liae of sl+d NE I14, 10.00 fcct East of tae Wcu liae of ssiJ ;Ifi 114, sai1
No montury coeeidentian or cauidert(ion of moaeury ralue hn bcen given tor the righis Aerein ron%vycd. . po;,t ec;,a o~ tho Ema riget of %var (ww) line or aowaL-.a R=d; theaee N 00'06'10'W, doet sxid E.ut
• RlW, 652.]sl fat m the Sou~h Gne of 111DIlAbIE ADDlTION projawl, a rownll ia B~ul• Il of
The undrnlgncd NYARRAM Ihol Iher hare Iht legil righl ta gnnl Ihi~ eoumenl and egrrc to hold h3rminf and indamnifc ' pUu, paYc 18 in SpoL'we Couury Wu,hingtoe; thcaee S 89'47'00'E, aluog laid ScwtO liae, 770.0J fat
the Cnntte (ur an7 damagn sutiertd Dr Crvmee ihould il I2trr Ae praen Ihal Iht Cr-andir Jid nol possnt wth IeRal rfgAle to th4 SW wmet ol' Lot 1 81a1c 3 MlAILDME 15T ADDRION, u rxorSal ie Dark 15 of P4tt, p+ta
Said londs aro fra of encumDnnces ncepi: ~~w• ~ ~ )S ia SpuWna Couary, WaaAiagton; dcace, tDe ncit l courxa ilon= the Suut6 liae of sici lu Ad+lisioa.
IN 1VITNESS 1VIIFR£OF, the undenfgned hax stl their runds ond w2ls lhis 7 N~ Jar nf b.64-,L , 195 3_ N'19'17'00'fi 117.56 (a{ thcaee N 88'I51j)'E 147.82 focC thcnca N 77'I8'42'E 4132 fact U3 dw
i NW corocr af iut l Block l 111O1L06tE 7TH ADORION, u raonlai ia 8aok 10 of Plus, yga 42 io
spukue e«wty, wusiagwa ftmcc, the nect 1 couna &kxir L6a wcu Liae of uW 1th Auliwn,
S 20'49'09'E 179.37 f«t; 0caca S 00'I l'OS'W 53l.17 fas tn the South lioe o( sxiii NE Ila; dicn:o
Cu ' wn ~ N 89'34'55'W 114.95 fat w tCo Puiw of &ginaiog.
hrrcury . .
STATE i)F ~ STATE Uf WA S k!+.f tvr 'TO r+ - • .
C(IUNTY Qi u COUNTY OP IN
On ihis day penaultr apfwircd bcfwe me On ihis Jry pcnnnalty 4pfv3My b,Wct mv
~y~, .-~"~1. 7'n ~f t - • .
ntip~~i+el~•. .
m he Mivwn to he the indiriitwl Jescriaed m and wlq exetvud the ro be kiwnn N bc tk PrniJcm mJ Stircury
of the rorpocation ihn accweJ (he (uicEninf inuNnani, ml
ackn~4Jgc the Ww1 inaNmcm w bc ihc (rte anl ndunnry xt anl
Wiinin iwen+ing instrvmeM, ud xkno.tedaed b`w dcrd d vid mrlwnaoe. (ur the uxe anf pmpKS iMrein n~airr . . ,
ed, +ni ekA an aih wud t+as ihry »ert iudw,riJN as rutiva viJ
ii;nn;",he ume n frte ind initromena and ihit ihe ual iflitel it ihe corpinit xaf d' uiJ %a• . ' . .
'
nilunnry xt and dted. fn Um usts +nd putpoui ikrtin meniioned. Poruio^•
•
CIYFN under my Mnd and ofTkial fnl IAh CIVEN under my hand ond oQ{tul snl thli ~ , .
a dq of r~ dy nf MaraL
'Q s ~'r~, r 9, .r ~ ` '
l ..v
~•~.`1:
~ 4,
Na;n Publk In .nd for the 5me af Kouq PuDlk In end for the Slae uf 3 ;
I ~ i. •
i midinR of rniding d
, ruww, 93atoi9 r~`;,ti~' S'F, . .
. .
AOL
~
~ imp-son EInc.
CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS
Licenced in Washington and Idaho
N. 909 Argonne Road
Spokane, WA 99212 `
c) .
;
VE-L.
~
.
t ^w
. ~ I \
i
4 TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSOFtANCE COMPANY
North 720 Argonne
Spokane, Washington 99212
Prepared For: Order No.: CD-171856M
SIMPSON ENGINEERS Certificate for F'iling Proposed: -
909 N. ARGONNE MIDILOME 8TH ADDITION
cc: Midilome Inc.
Charge: $125.00
Tax: 10.00
Total: $135.00
PLAT CERTIFICATE
Effective Date: January 25, 1993 at 8:00 a.m.
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of the Spokane County
Auditor' s and C1 erk' s of f ices , and the of f ice of the Clerk of the United
States District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is
- made for the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for
closing any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount paid for this
certif icate . Erom such examination, the company hereby certif ies the titl e
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to wit:
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 33, Township 25 North,
Range 44 East, W.M., described as follows:
Begin at a point on the South line of said Northeast quarter, 20.00
feet East of the West line of said Northeast quarter, said point being
on the East right of way lineof Bowdish Road, thence North 00°06'10"
West, along said East Right of Way, 662.23 feet to the South line of
MIDILOME ADDITION projected, as recorded in Book 13 of Plats, page 18;
thence South 89°47'00" East, along said South line, 370.00 feet to the
Southwest corner of Lot l, Block 8, Midilome lst Addition, as recorded
in Book 15 of Plats, page 35; thence, the next 3 courses along the
South line of said lst Addition thence North 79'17100" East 117.58
f eet; thence North 88°15'53" East 147.82 feet; thencE North 77°0531"
East 41.83 feet to the Northwest carner of Lot 1, Block 3, Midilome 7th
Addition, as recorded in Book 20 of Plats, page 92; thence, the next
2 courses along the West line of said 7th Addition, South 20°49'09"
East 179.47 feet; thence South 00°11'05" West 531.13 feet to the South
1 ine of said Northeast quarter; ichence North 89' 48' S5" West 734 . 95 f eet
to the Point of Beginning;
Situate in the County oF Spokane, State of Washington.
(continued)
,
. ~ , ~ 4..
. r
4 Order No.: Cd-171856M
Page No.: . 2
VESTED IN:
EDGAR BUESCHKE and LOUISE E. GDSTIN, whL acquired title as LOOISE E.
BUESCHKE, as tenants in common. - EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as
to Parcel No. 45335.9158 Affects: This and other property.
!.~►~t--~-~
1-i s 33 5". 9 166
2. Preliminary Notice of Assessment for Road Improvement District No. 452,
the amounts of which will not be determined or payable until the work
is completed and the assessment roll is filed. When said assessment
is filed and becomes a lien, it will have priority over a previously
recorded mortgage. The lender's policy to issue will not include this
exception unless said assessment has been filed.
3. CONTRACT OE SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
SELLER: Edgar Bueschke and Louise E.
Bueschke, husband and wife
PURCHASER: Midilome, Inc., a Washington
Corporation
DATED: July 1, 1977
RECORDED: August 4, 1977
RECORDING NO.: 7708040308
(Covers property herein described and other property)
Purchaser's interest is now held of record by Edgar Bueschke and Louise
E. Gustin, who acquired title as Louise E. Bueschke, as tenants in
common, as disclosed in Spokane County Cause No. 84302158-4.
4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOE:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Installing operating, maintaining,
altering and repairing a sanitary
sewer system
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
DATED: February 25, 1986
RECORDED: ' March 4, '1986 " RECORDING NO.: 8603040234
(continued)
, • .
~ • o_
~
Order No.: CD-171856M
Page No.: 3
5. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Construction, installation,
operations, maintenance and repair
of public utilities, signs and road
maintenance installed or in the
future installed in the Easement
area, right of ingress and egress
AREA AFFECTED : The South 35 . 00 f eet of the NE1 / 4 of
Section 33; Except the SE1/4 of the
SE1/4 of the NE1/4
DATED: December 2, 1991
RECORDED: ' December 3, 1991 RECORDING NO.: 9112030221
6. Potential liability for assessments levied by Spokane County Utility
Department for the Aquifer Protection Area. To verify, call 458-2538.
In order to make payment, account number is necessary.
TRAAISAMERICA TITLE INSOR.ANCE COMPANY
By Q
Connie Dodge, Title Off
For Service on this orde ca]1:
(509) 922-2222
ENCLOSURES: Paragraph(s) 3-5 °
Sketch
md
• ',i ~ ^ . '~1 i . ..i i.. . ~ . _.'s~:,~ ~ ;~~1
-
u•A'u•~ RfJ 1 ! ~7.,~1~1
•
5.1LE e,G:t=E:`!CST v
i,
THIS AGREE!:6:tT, mzda and antutad ia=o this ~ czy ei
July, 1977, by and between _CGAR 9UESCEK° and :,OG25E C. ' hs..;band z;d wi:c, as ~ail:cs, anc: >>IOILQ!1y. INC., a t<;.shi^g_=n
wrporetion, aq 9uyQrs,
142TNES:;GT:i:
. ,
~ ihat Lha Sall2rs aqraa to :•e?1 ;o clto B%:per _;•.e
1uvc:r agreas to pCtCCJSe crcm :he 0c11u:s •1?on c':ki tcrr,.s a^~:
~ c~:ndicior:. hereinaf:er se: 'orth, _he :oitowiag c_sc::be~ :e.!
~ esCata aicc:CO ir, S?okana Cou; Scaei o: :•ias :in;ten, :o-wic:
ai descr:•tior.
~ Sac actachad 2a9 ~
~
n
~ .
It i, h,a:eby agreccl that :;aic: u:uaei,y
13.32 ,:c:cs oc ian;;, a1d tFc prioe t^e:ecf, ;i:
oa 5:,250.00 rec ae:e, is ehe _otal su;- or 540,2.'5.010,
o rcica pcrchasa r:icc sha!1 ba as :c::lc•:s:
$5,000.00 Oc ro:e ac ?-j:chasec'a opt.z , ;n
. 3an::ary 1, 191S, a^c $5,000.00 ur roca _t
t.~_C.. .:t• ur,:l, i ~
optior, on --ac`: ar,c eti•ery Januz:y 1-~.
, Cllll p'1CCC1S2 pC:CJ t15 "car paid, C~2:Q ISQ;.i,,g
In enCl OI 33:d :Lv::ie'tS , :C:CS: J~ c:C :.i:,, u:
~ 75 ocr ..-nc:1 on :ic u;scr.'_d ce--lucirc. b31a::'.:cs nerc-i:,
.:it1 said nini-um ,ncuzl oa;^ents tz-1 t^ciut~t_ c:ie .,.cctas;t. '
All pnyments s"a'1i ye app'.ied fitst, to i:....._.:~ _°a
=ecand, r-c recuceion --f ua!ance, u;t:, inc,2_-es: tc
commcnce as ~'L' ,;ul;i 1_, 1917.
1S mIVd^_LStOG;1 B;:C .'.q:'CC_ :i.''.!"t•-S
tnat: rr,c ....}•e: w.ii be i'ct,_ir.y sai:!
io=s o' nr.c to .i.100
. sr:.:ar. Faez cc,cn. Cgon t4e F:_.nq s::c; -..:,c ....d,
:ts acct!q.a;:ce ar,d ci,-L1 a= :•o-al Sroka-o
thf_` Bl:Vt_: 5l13!l n3.LC}' $C1l"S :R
t.pOf. Sl:l':1 f0t1Cd, Sc1lt.:5 isq:ic' _0 i:, sl:th :C'S dS
' S`u? 1 GC CeCulf?.d t0 E'.':Rd .i. }:lwk.-lli ,0 01:C3i." f,'Q
5:'1Dld't1C:f CO til,! UCOpt?Lr}'-.ill„yC
CJl1SC :;uCl1 t:t1E' :.J OC cpISCCd J: C3CCKC1. `nc:z a :t:
SeIiCCS ,i(l:all C'l,Cc:.:C 3nd C3::Y?l' i.C C'.C 2::C:fi'.
11c:f0.iftC: CtCL;icji~lCzu 1QUIC Cl.'.lm Ci~(j =Ci CaL.1 r:a~:t•:
L.;C 1Q :i1:GS OIJpt'+.:Cy, '+:Cf1 E.l-:e`.L iS y"CJaC,,e. A d
when the 3uyer, mays to h':ie Escrcw Aq~~~t r-he su;., e;
IT e..e.b
7.~ < 4.,; C,,.a1
, ' ~I2~`.:~7"':aC, j.''j
' tJ;~ iv ~r~i:;i. ~,r ~ ~
. ~ •
• , ~
.
~ t,,,ti ~ . , ~
•~'i'~ i•.L t,J~, ) 1.: •;'C ~ ~ ~ ,
' ii:03.CC d.',:! ~cs2C,"`E%Ci iCy ChC~ a.:ztl _OC a 99204, 7COVidcu Chac eitner a:~ ~ c,~.
- py 7ay ,.nqa his ~ Ci lace Qi ad~;css
G:3C'.C~l LOt iiC.'O~d Lcenc 9h~°.L c.:Lt!1e hV I10CLC' t0 the J;her Od:tY qiven d3 iit';Clft C0'~'Qd,
• CQCU1Cc't C0f1Ye~,~i C~:2 SC.I:~,U:, `JC Ci:,:ty^Qt'~ [0 5411.'.:. mdl1;11S 0; 1GY scch notiCO, C8f.131G~ OC i.GntRl'~C1C1t~OG dS hB:Cli1
3
L~ ~:i:'/Qf .^e~ ~ D_e;_ t0 t •
y;1C3C2 pcov.ded ~nali ~e a~cifician; :,ervice c`~ereo:; and s~_vi~e i;,
any ra^ner sha11 be suf:icient o:;ly ii ceceipc c:iereoE oz acknevie&gcd
In a:divion, :t fs cr.ddra:oo;; and ,:5;acd chat ia wrztinq 6y the party who is seriad.
S~_-;er is ^c•4 the oc•;r,e: ;n Eee s'snplc oc e^uch-zr yort?on •
o°, p:DqecC~ '.l tlle sa7o Sacc_on, ^,our.shin a;id C,2n,e as . Ty, Duyer hereun6ec assanes all rfs~ oF loss o- dznzgL
_z c"•c s4b;r.ct a` c1_~ r;~uhich propr.;cy fror., ar,y and a1i causea to the ~no1a or any ps:t of thu ?;QUorty
lb ulcJ tv.!!Lj ."11.f:_d I.'1L0 I(:S«i:nC? 10:3. Ql:j''2r , COVC':<`d hcCCbV, and SUCh l049 OC aaCiASC S!1al1 1Az a:tvCC a;1 0:
uy:<<5 c::::c as each loc is so_u °ren said :rot;csty t;;a o51ig1tions oE the 8uyar uadcr ehis contract. Y
by 3--yec, lluyer •.ri:l '_'irthet pay S1,500.00 inco
A?e;st .or _ec::::ion of tha rer,.afn?r.g balance Tha Seltecs ag:ea to ;u:nis`, Tit1e Insurarcz Policy
`~I' -~'~=1~~• cc_tiEied co Ju1y 1977, ahoatr.g tic.c in Sai:e:s free `rca
incumbrar.c,os, e:::eoc roads oE :acord; it cef;u c:d,:rstoo3, rVwlvJ1`,
`'ti0 SSC=C51 n '~e;tt S!13ll ;',SVe :ZiL'( C0 L::::C !OL OSv
..J :C5~:.:19 purs ~ 0: t1:5 111sL:U:1e.^.C, ,`,::d !01l0:2i^CJ :i.0: he
1G=1::3 u'3 ;a 'd.`,i:Che_ GC f1C: SC.%CL 1: C:::1CLv'd Q. ROt COf1513E:2V u9 :acunbrancest 32SdCVJt10;,4 Ca,',t11^.;d 1C 1f1v 0; L;12
~n~. c.s~•'f zl~`~ rit'CC :;,:fi ;l11~ ^~::JCOW u^p1 [h~'. :OClil,°i OC ~7atp1C 0-1 CSCOa CORT,OCl~~ uSQa O,V the Uait.C: ;t3:23 p:
'`C:::ICS 0 =-aI.. SV F:;1;P,C iVll.'.ClC3, thc Stete in ;4h1C:1 C".a property 15 IOCdCCd, "'c;L'~l~ .
z C.19`.. CI.•y~•00• hA:1• 5
~_n
-a~:C:r A;;er,c sali Se crcci:_d towa:d .::e Pacific Ra'slroad Ct~noany oc*the',;ortherr. ?aci!ic Z3ilway cc-.,?s„%*;
~tyrer.tz CtilC (iCCAJYi:n: Of1 ;dCilllC;/ 1 Oi f'aCh• bl:i!d1:1g CUsCriCt1018 CCC1110f1 t0 the p1JL:Jd tra:c :;1 N'4;y4 :;Q
' property is situato; easaner.ts .or p:iv,r.e d_i•reways in
1'_:r.ics or public zoac'.s aatual!y in usa as ai:ch; ajsa-ca.s .'or
sE:l'l'C3 aS:e? :0 40IP. bllt` OU~d1' :Ot CUIGbS,~S 0f teicp`ione, 3e1.eL, ~Jd3,
vdCQ: OC C12CC:1C sC.'v.Ce; CCft:C.1::4
C::..:F; OI 0l1C3 z0_0e :l:L't)_C~~i: uP.~l :flt: _CG:zI:SCI1 ' C::.:L'110;1 LO t!13 Z.aCL :fl 5•:t1C: t.lL 3L07C:t'/ 17 91C::aL~ _,ti! M.:!C1I'C:
S:_?E.S, 311CfS, i;:1IliV QyS,2Ii.e!1:3 i.0 t0 S177ip1V1ng lJ3tc`: 'si.a Elc l'T::.~-V .0 i.llr pz.
C':JS't5 :...4 L^CC:.:C1:1CZ .
C.'~4 u'r .L•'.^,L CP.dvO:ldLi;/ i1cCcSSc;?"/ t0 LfO~::_:v 5tl:~dlV:de of ir_iqaCion 3tiC taidCL:iC 5yS.2:SS. - 3uyr: shall Fav c";? Co5:S 0_
t..e ?:a~e__v erd cb=aia a-ia:c:el o'S:aka::~_ County cf rccordinq of t::is ccatcact. :1 escise ta:< siiail ta paid U~~
Scliers. • .
::e B:y:_ sc:-.2,:s :o pa; a?1 ta:,es and assass;nencs oa The ;cllers have :nace a c,ood ar,d suFficie-t Geeri cor.;a}•i:iy .r.::G C:;'e;:1 the saze•Si:a:l b2cOnL 02:11.sl:dl:L. ~ 5A1d poCeC,tiS2S t0 the purci^sie: f:32.df:C Clv'3C JC a11 L~CTS ul:c:
incunbrances, except roads of :ecord.
's_:~- s`~al: ~,a•.•~ pos:,...sii,n o[ ss:u pro?u:ty
...~f !177,•zC-4 5}:s".!i CCG.`.SC.C°1:1 .i:1Ch fU5S0fiS1G(1 SO long 38 . ~ I_ is a7rEed that s,ild DCe,a,, COge:;._^ _ W:C,h a co" 0:
..".:S 0_ t.^.1s r:yl~?2:.'!t:C dr° Lull;! W1C(1. t~~1S L, Sr:all bl fl1aC:.4 . Sfl CSC:OW ii1C':Ci'C 7•
alt~j~ , ~aiich ~s ~iCS2~'JY dppoinca:i
'.:1nz t..2 z1"f.l_1:.i OC co agCIiC }12CCU:1(1dC. :+c1C~ CaCrOW A4C:1! 15 coreby allthD:1zcC `_J
CJ'?C.^..',:1t5 'sn:: aa_CsC..'Cti h~:c_^ mC:~tlOR:~1, CeCdl~'~' TOpI@5 uncet C~:@ tC~S'OC C::1S :,qceer..ent ar.d t0 SSS~^ :.:2
:'e 33».° stial: :G;15t2:Jtd iGCF-31C::_. Ji C.^.:S Mg;,;_.nent dtiC $eLLeLS receiot5 che:,:FO:C, d;d ahen the tCLTS Of Lh:S nCT@@7C.^.:
`.,',C 5ellc:5, d! C^e:= C::C1:.^., i.t3./ i,CCl:.;o :uC;1 iQC.eLt-u:e are :L'lly COmO1:EC1 1:lth, t0 Cc'1=VZC 5a1d ?eCQ df:d cS::Oti' Oa3C;S
'o;; W_:c:en r.o:'_1 to t'r.e 3u7er. case,;:~~ C~yer stiali b~ to the 3uyer. E2Ch OL the pz:;ie; hera,o a4ree co ya~~ or._-aaiE
_t:t' .:t a. L!: iCc 737T~C: :3 :CJCP, ':_R (IU~ Gd!/5 dC.i~ u VCt =Ce OE ~ .
. , t:~~ esc:ow :ee charged by the =scrc~; ,;y~~t,
J: ._'~::~:e _s s:^,. Ua h~ere`... aco~,:~u-4 t^e 2sycr au_ecs to ?av
nciac: :e; t;.e Sai!,;r-' cc^t t:, hn ?ceparatien of T_me is the essenca ot chis Ayreenen;.
S:t:_ . 0: :27.00 1$ : NL:.I~:.~!1 :C!:bUJ::C :0 .RE:
G_ :°lio ;.;,:1::3CC. i:t Ltl: OF
3 1):• C~i:'~ :.C:zc::.!'.1t i:
C: hav:.z I.:cc:R
_
•
L't.. t y 0 ~ a C bi~ i .+y e
, Y,i ~ ~ J: i~ • .
ar.'L C~:La ;ili t•z at 1n end ~:.nd C7
/ ac 3~es
.@
aCl('. ':l
_9 37'I?! S^~a1l _CC:eiL L~ :LE Sc:idIS~ .]S Ci~.;.
~ . C.:-3jcS Lil r.`.. _.'i:~S Mi:.ia .^.p:l'°..nw21', .1:.d :.T:'.CZLdtCil .
G: _.nlSc:S, lbl': C'lt iia:li:r-~ o: C61o. •
"z :i ~vC:? 7::a_C a: Sf.y :l;de UGoiI Vi01.1C10.^, Cf 2..1y ~'i .~r-s a: 4..`._;: coru3cc 1-y -ae 317e•• s`ail b~ d-.~ehe:! tr.1y •
7:+C.".t .`.Jil::3 C: Li,...t ..3Lt1CCld: C1»3 P..",d 5.`.C.l1 ,.~.~G.~•,..: ,~.:G'...." ~...i~,~
.:C a 0_ d.^ Yi,:.1CS C: :(:c: :CllB..' ' L'v'.:.52 3l'E~C:iriv'
.3
.._:C1!1. i.:' C?.:..iyC J. COC-i21IC3L30: lQ JC .
_1• ..Ci.C: -8!CY•CO ti:1S CJ.".t:2Ct z0 t.".2 Ot:1C_ G6fz- Sh111 e~ICYLOi'l:. IkC.
::r._4 t:~_13:.,LLtC3 to the other pa=.1 ay ce:ti::ed
::-3 SGC'. C:".v' SQ11 e :S R0'lt? 1, CDoOCCL'.".l:V~ 'n1SR1t1 COR ~ /
:3?Co, a::' t`:c 3~ye: a: t•1. 5CL -)_d a•renuc, SFokane, wash:9,ton 9!
1J, `'..Jf,
• , AttESt
. ' • . J.'.lC~t31'j
-3-
. ` , • .
~ ~ , . • ~
, ~ . ,14: 533
L:i+TZ' 07 i;nSiil:;v:0:ti ) ' , \ .
C.Oc^.:! 0_0 $n.:;:.t:lQ ~ ~
C:I Chis I>/_r eay o..: , 1977, bacore mu, the . ~ N
. ,j
a:Iatary 2cblie in ar.3 :or the State of s1ashic.ctan,
9U~.:~ili{E '~!li:: ~7CCt1Gt1 0f t~1c ~;UC:hCJSt CL1:,C: 0: $CC:L3' :;r
c:: ~~c.^..i~si~n_•d a.^.= „ror~ c~_aor,ally appeared EOGtiR , !:aa.l•, ,~'.t•1.., ~
c:ascrihaLt as :o°_'.o•~s:
`~ls wl:e, t~ r.e knou~ tu Sa the individuals Buqir.nin5 ;,t t::a !tio:th qua;ce: co:~e: o: Sec.:o:~ 71; t`:^:e Sostti
. _nd :,~S:3E a. 3JtSCyri=, Uc,°35'10" E<.st, -tIonS C',te 4;es: 1: '
, nc o: saiC r;.;ar~c., ~
C~latd.'.Cz 0E 1~87.$4 ECe*; t~l2RCE SJL~.i, S`~°'~710~'* 75s:~ z1:.1:le1 Wii.:'l
Ca;:-.5ec ar.L ~.~~o exacuted cha :oreSo:~S inscrart:eac, a:~~ I the ;.a:th lina of nzid ;:octheast Gua_car, d C16.3nCa o: 2J.00 :_a: to
:.lt' tIU_ 7011:~`, o; b~g:?itIL:tlo^e° eoaz.r.^.uin •,.1't.u `
~sc,:r:o•..ecge3 to re Cha: tney s1q'fCt: Sftd SCSLC(: the saiz iast:•lr..enc I ` So_::~ 05 ~ :.zy ,
a1c~q •`,e Sou.y 1:^: oc Bloc:c ]^:IDILO:ILF a a:;=a^„z+o: JiO.GJ
c5 .:.sl: f.C4 S.^..a. VOlL'.^.3L_V 1Ct d'd 7~Cd :0: rt° 11Sf5 1^^j pULz09C9 fr=C; ti10nCB VJ~th 00'06'10° W25C, !L-:.^.g Cild 'r3sCI:r^..? 0: BLO,.C 3r d~.
• .
dlstance of 135.00 feet; t^anca -o:c:~ 3?°4?'u~.' Eas:a d:sta::cc c:
:JC!' thCCCC N0rth 00°13109" d5:.:1f.Ci 0: 00.00 .C~: t'3 'e •
:fo:2-l: -.0(t'1JRdd. ' ;:Cg?r.nin~f J: ;1 CL'[Je Co'CSVd :0 Ct:C \0I`CI '.~:C~; a ` . .y. :'^v+t G~,.• `
" ~ "7.1' 0:
~ z celtreL wa;le ef
;;I^;•;; -,,i !:ar.d and of!'_cial szal 5ereto aFfixed th~ So~lth E9'4;'00" _aafss o_ 1G9n.;9 .eec zr.d ~
17'23'10"• thence '-73sce:ly e:an; t=.e a;c, adis;ance o` 33:.75 `'_et;
~ ' _J r i thenca Souch 00'Oo'10" E+sc a dista.^,ce a: 937,07 .ce: to t..e 5oct; _ir~
, r~af sr.~ ~lta= i^ c~: sert;fica:e above w:i ten. ( o' said Nort'; _ ,
- . .c:ist qua:ta.; t`~ecice ':o::i 34°:5'03" t:ast •?a^S s,id
` E South line, a clstance of701.E4 :eet to a^oi;t iJ.Co rCa`_ _asc of
`hQ
WESt 11..C OZ Shcf: NQ:C:285C ZJ3:CeYf :Za.'.C2'::JC:h :0'001 :1- d
, ; • . diSLdnCO Of 602 ~ .39 l~Qt to ttia t ~ .
d~~.~c•\ J r~.. . ,r•,.:, ~ L'c rO1LL 0: 5ey1n..._I..,'
1.". 51'.:: iCL; CC2 Sl'1.8 I r r
• , 1 ll_CC 1 the CJClI: O!'.ri:OriBG,, J._L@ J
7tc;, :esi._., ~ 7 . , f
c: waahi^. S at Sookat.,.
i ~;;;s~r ~ ~ . • .
u\!~\\ ~~;f 1~ l I I
I, ,'I' •
~ ~,1'~ 1
( •
~ . I
` l. ~ •
~ 4 ~
• ~ ,
7.
• . A
• t
• ` .
9112.030titi1
, . ~ ~ .
~ SPOXATIC COUt17Y ENCII1F.EitIUC DEPARTISEN2
Spokane Councr, Ilashingcon ~
YOI. ~L q 3 PAGE 9117
F.ASPliF.1tT
Tht rir&I1C0[( ~1]iettrt ~ • ~1;.~~` ~ ~ ~ i 1' ~ 1 n / o ~C~~,fr • ~ ~ • ~ ~ .e .
of the Councr o[ Spokene. S[ace of WaanlnQton, lor •iu1 lo con•ldoracloo ot 11utua1 ~noneflts to them in Aand paid, and cecetpc of vhlch 1• 1►a[oby .cknowltdged. acant& '
co •Spokan• County, a poll[lcel nuDdlvlslon of the 5[at• of 1t•shington, •n Lsotoant
' ovsr, under, upoo.and acrone cho D•rein•[c.r d.•criDed laads s1[uated la the Countr
" of Spokane, Scete" of uaohingcon: •
iu
l'lie Suutli 35.110 ICrI of the Nt: I/14 uf Sccliun 71, l. li h.,K. h4 L.U.N.
• Slouhisin Cuuiity, ::lolc uC MashiuC.luu . .
~ .
liXI:F.PT tlir SE 1/4 vC Llic 5t; 1/4 u[ lhc N1: 1/4 uC said 5o:c tiun
ALSU L'Y,GI:I''I' ISuuJi::li Iluad '
Nlscu Uoc furcc ai.iiu ts ic►p1nceJ anol nu Iun1:C[ 11ecJc.l lllc Cuunly w►Il rwcliJ vr
fl`lCa: t: IIiC C"I3C1uClll ,lll(l ::4:1111 :1 Ctilfr u( V1:CO1`Jl:J 1140CU1*4:61t lV IIIC V['.4I6ICC.
The Esienenc granted to Spoksne Countr•and it• •uil,oricaJ aQeoc• •nd/or ae.lgni, is
~ for [hs sO1• purpola of tonstCUtclOtl, lnstallatlon, operatlone. nslntqnanc4 •nd repalr of publie ucllleles, •igns •nd roaQ meintcnanee vlch(n sald Esssoont.
The C[ontor(s) b.roby releaseo Spokane Councr, •nd alllcs of(lcars, eeployaes, snd - •gentt and/or eosiQn• lron .nr responsibiltty o( lieblllc7 (or ♦ny dam¢. •
" vh&taoevec ineludtng lnverna eond•mnation by or eo •ny ♦nd •11 per.ons or yropercr
&rlsint out of or in •ny vay inciden[ to oT •ttc1Du[aD1e co the 'con•[ruction,
~ insc.llatlon, operstlons, ma1ntenance •nd c&p#le of publie utillties, •lini •nd
` rood wainccnsnee ylthla •e1d Eooemcnt. . - - •
~ , • .
~ Thl• Easoaonc aloo gr&nts co Spokont Councy an4 lti •utt►orlcAd &tint• and/or
•ssians tho clbhts of injroso •n4 •jrtoo to, oviT •nQ 1r0m sald Laseaonc for th•
consttuction. insttlldtion, operatl.ons, maintenince ahd tepaic of puDllc ucllici•i,
signs and toad malnccnsnc• ins[alled oc in ths fvtuCe instAll•d in tha E.,amcnc.
' •ree. '
7h• Paeoa+cnt EcacriDed herelnabovo 1• to and &hall run vlch th• lsnd. No
aod!(ie.tl'on of the bounderiee of •o1Q Easemonc, tan be p&de wlthout the pr17oC
aDDrov.l of Spotione County. . '
. • \
IN uITNESS 1fNEAEOF. ~ r hnve hareunto •et Tand(s) •nd •ea1(a) this : of -
• • 0 f V) '7 • r . ~ 1 9 ~J ~ •
/ f~(. ~ ~G'--" ~ ~ //j~ l ~ • •
• v , . _ . v I
!i/t/?/l! r/ { '~~CG~• . . ,T•~r~~~~' Y'''///• C~ 4
/ . ' . ~ .
; /;~C..~.c~~~C/.~i ~rCiC.. G~/.',t~;`/U,lrc• ~ ,,C~ ~ ~.c/},~ ' ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ STATE OF NASII INCTOtI ) . < , , •
couNrir ot' sroxAIie )
On thi• dsy ptisonallr eppeoCed be[ora Me
~
~~1•.l , n f_". .n'_1.1A..n\ n~~ n.T~rrnl•I I^ ~~1~~.1.1 ~~'....~..n,
peCsonally knovn Co n• to Dc ch4 lndlvldusl(a) vho oxoCVtoJ tha lorgoing lnstrua.nt
.nJ •cknovledged the salA inetrumene to b• tha f[e• and voluntary nec •nd deed of
•aid lndivlduAl(a), fo[ fhe use• end purpoooe ehereln wentloncJ. .
. ~
Clven unAar my 1iand •nd eaal thl• r._ day of ,.~..1,; ~ , 191), I • .
. Notary Yu011C /
, •in •nd toe the Ste[e of 11n4hingtan,
rceldinQ a[ Spokane, WasAinlton.
t Gc-» luA 69,rr1 Dai* 7DIG ~ 19 91
Spolutrn Couriy Tna
i~eemcn[/loTmn,l H
. , .
- , . . . . . . .
. . . . , , , , . .
. , .
b~;+)JU•10~31 crt, .8
02
1~79
~ ~,,~F • . rr,~. . EASE;~.;fIT FOR SfdER FAUIITY
. .
, iF; ,71•'IT~A,:~f0il4:fE, L'IC„ a corparation of the touniy of 5potan
S;ace of 'Plashlnqton, for and Sn conslderatfon of Qne Oollar (51.00) to them in hand paid, anr rcceipt ofwnich i: hereDy acknawledged, grants to Spckane ~ ~
S;nj" i~ i:;~16:i ss
Caunty, a pali;ical suDdlvislon cf the State of 'dashfngtan, an easement fn, , Csu :y o,+ Spnkanc 1 ,
into, ovcr, under, uqon and across the hereinaFtcr descrlhed lands 5ltuated •
A. ;~ay of ~ch~~!n.tv , 1986 , befor: re, tlte unccrsigned,
{
in the Ccunty of SpoY.ane, State of liashlnStan: a,;G.:rj 2 tin and far cne ~Wz» at .'ashiagton. Jul/ ccvr+issioreJ ard
5•.;o-r., ;erscnatl; a:7esreE EJG~A 9L:St'rikE and 7CCEni T0;'LINS01,
That pcrtlon of the tlortt-,(est Quarter o( Sectten 33 ~ .,~.~;~n ~a ;~e ?residen: ard 3ecretary, r:speccively, cf ;.i0ttU;s., l%+C.- a .
• t~.r•~ ~e. ?~n~e 44 E,'a.,i. in : GKdt 111~C , , f
p~ y , '~~'~~L~:.,~ t~a Sa(4oIfSifL:iGOCC;ct be uchc freeard voluntary ract ~andJdeed
. ~ashir.yta~n ~es4crlCeG~as `oliors: , .
, accr.c•~:_-,-- . ~
2e;lnning at the Sauth.~est corner of lot l, 91ack 6 0` sa;C CCr„ra:lor, tct the uses and pur~cses thereln r,enCione~S, and an
the sa
of ~fI'r5T i:OG(TIOI as recorded 1n Vofun^ 15 ~ c.:n s:.:ee :1at :r~?y are authcrtted to execuce icl tnstrurent and that
o! Plats, Page 35; thence South a distance of 707.05 s?ai a"IreG fs the Corparate Seal ef said Ccrparation.
fne:; therce Wes: a dtstan:e of 250.6 f^:c; tlienco! /~L~ ~ t;~•a171~;5 ',;nE~EOF, I navehereunta set c,y hand and affixed RY eEf1c{al
;;cr-.; 0oG-';',3" ',;est a Cistaace c` EZO fTet to the .h ~ scil, the 2ay ana ycar fSRt aoove aritten.
Southr.ist torner of lot l, Block JN(OI.G:;: HQ.;titOV
~ zs recarded In .'el-lre 13 cf ?la!s, Page 12; chence ' I C'*vv'A- °7 ''~~'.~~~''r
5nt,:h Z1047' Etst aicnj scuthcrn Douncary of i4IGIl0;,'.E ;lotary ?atlic tn snd for the Staca uf
rZ:lifC'1 :0 fee: .a the Saut),,east corner af lot 4, Wasntngtcn, restding at 'jpokane.
Elc;k : a` ;+OOiTiON; thence "ort5 19017' East
a ti;s,arce of 111,:6 feei; thence N 2d°'S'53" East a G(siance ~IL~•~ •
o( 141.22 feet; ther.ce i:creA 38015'53" Ease a Cts.ance of
21;.23 feet; t`sFr.:e ,Iorth 6i°37'35" East a dfstance af ( •
25,E2 fcet :o the trua point of teginning. . ' ,
'it~e easerPn►, granted to SpaY.ar,c County 1s for the sole purpose of installing, ~
,
o,?ra:ir.;, ~atntaiair,g, al.erir.g and repatring a sanitary sewcr systcn. It is ~
^r;rr.ssl/ crCersCOOC anC agrced that Spokane Counry and/ar Its autharized aqencs i
I
sball have the rlght of ir,yre;s and egress ta the rroaerty EescriDed {iereinabave
fcr :`e G_rp:;e of lrstaiting, operatirg, rain;ainin5, aitering and rep5iring
,
such sewEr s/ste.-i. Spc'r.ane Caunty ardJor i[s duly au.harit?d a;ents at all •
:;me; hereina`:zr, at tneir ven cost and expense , rray remove all crops, brush, , ;ras; or trees that ray tnter`2re witii the ins:aliatlan, eperatton, maintenance,
; a;;erin3 trC re)iir a: such seeer sys.en. . ; %i`E 0 ~1!~ c
grantor reserves the right to use the strip for purposes ►ihich will ' ,jE~,.-5;,}~ co„_ty.Eng;neer
. : . .
. r:t '^':rE2re o;; 6h Srantee's full enjo/%ent of the riqhts hereby granted, provided
4 pT PH '8b
' ;na; ;rar::r shail nct enC: or tor,s.ruct any buildisrj or ocher struttures, ot
willlAx E. MNtaluE
• ct'1niSr Gr S;jbSta-.[lalty atd [o the r,round caver an the easerent. ' alioit0il
; '.6?a6AHCOEGUN MW1M'
PUI
''e ease-,!ni Eescribed hereinabave shall run Hfth the lanE, `,V Ji
~ `y
~ W1?'iF'.i 14riP,E,►, ;4e Fave hereunto set our hanEs :hfs 'Oay af
` Foy Court Houee wxx
: ' 1 .
, ;r„~ , 1986.
t,MU M6t1C" a carp tion~
; • ;
i
By; 4~r/ Psi dent
'••,~t•~ .irr/ 1,~~1 ; ~ ~
! , ` `r✓,~~ By;
Secretury
~ J .
/
' ' • ~ . , ~ . 1 ' , , r~I~K.ra . h~w...~.. , . . ~ • 1
. . . r.. - rti: . . .
. I .~ifa~ ~
TilAU1SAMERICA rITLE INSUR~ E COti1PANY A QD 4 ~
~ . r w.J f a"i ~.w .r ~ ` ` ,
V
,~iis sketch is c thout ch; for u.
d; ~;(orms;ion! ~ ~ .tened to s ~
AL-OH all m~+~^cs
ng, b~t ~t ~im'~"'~
rnfatr,~i Eo thC proGcrty inCl~~di e
~r~~~t, dimensions. y?s~mo,ntS, o~ or S
, houndsrie5. It ;s „o,. v~ ~ n~; dnrs. M! Di LOM ~ ,
` E 3 RD. AGD
o
r..,., 6 ~ rn....~~~^^nt r.• ~.^F ~~tli!;~: 1t IS
ihr .r;"i "I', tc~ ony ;f ~ O
A L" 4~N~°`~. ai^. .,.~.,c •~.ti ~~r~r~,.~ ,[,;r y~ ~
~:r.~ I / O O
S r~q~{~
0 t ~1~~ 0
At4NA AtO.NA LQ~A ~ ~ M .1 I I y4 ; ~ \ Q
SECOND
°,/,pP ~ 1 Y ;
AaP~~~:
~ f r~ ~ 1 ~ J ~ r,~ ~ r~ ~u
oEY MA~1~
A D D. rx
. . . . 5 ~ a0
EY MAR~E MARIE 2 N~'
~O
/
~/t ,
~ IGUE'5
A aD ~
1ST Aoo 1 - MI DI~Om C
V
_ .
a ADD ' . 6 j" . .
^
~ A~
C H ES T ER
~
HEIGHTS
C? ~ - ~t ~
F-cT p i5
►~3
o0w
1aLL, ~ ~ . , ,
- ,
!6 (I17 , c 0.) '
31! Q-
s .
, • . •
0~0
' r C~6
13'0 i <a 150 1.f9
D
° £ ~
~ ~ • J
0 11 f
~ ` ~i~ - ~ is,.r~ ~ I
za\o E .
` 'r~ ~ ~ !Zf . e
i \ \ 1 q
(.'0
~ ~ ^ \ '~,_\~'f;~', ~ •w,, ~ ~r.~ .
~
0
.
F~g, 1
~~~~~N2- co~wry
Washington Water Power ~~~N"C'; DcPARg~~M-F
February 10, 1993
Mr. Duane Helt
Simpson Engineers, Inc.
N. 909 Argonne Rd.
Spokane, WA. 99212
Re: Midilome 8th. Addition
Dear Mr. Helt:
Enclosed is a return copy of the above-mentioned plat.
Pursuant to your telephone conversation with Dan Walsh, The Washington Water
Power Company respectfully requests that the 13' strips be identified as "utility
easements" as shown in red on the enclosed map.
Please add the following dedication language to this plat:
Utility easements are hereby granted to the serving utility
companies over the private road and utility easement areas
as platted and shown hereon.
If our office can be of further assistance, please contact me at 482-8536.
Sincerel ,
Donald J. Malisani, SR/WA
Supervisor, Real Estate
Ehclosure
cc: Spokane County Planning Department il~
The Washington Water Power Company P.O. Box 3727 Spokane, Washington 99220 (509) 489-0500 / 1-800-727-9170
SERVING EASTERN WASHINGTON AND NORTHERN IDAHO WITH ELECTRICITY AND NATURAL GAS
\ 1\{
s- 08,105 %93 15 : 36 '$`50:1 7477987 IPRL i+ ~ ~ 441
,
llugu;ot 5, 1993
Caunt.y P1¢Mner ~
Tom Eel jic
`L
~ :T o[R
~ . . .
I was just speaking wit.h Duane a~ SimpsUn Engineers Inc~, M<< a3ked ;
-me to fax over acupy uf tlie i eLLer stati-rig a.dequate easemen~ s riave
been receijred 1'or thG Mi.dilul-,le, Inc. Any qtieCf:ions, pl.edse kive nie a c;all at 747-7 151 Fxt 273.
Margie HawurLh
Inland Power & L,:ighL .
TJow "`~'ervic i,Uor•c:lznatar
.
0
i
~
\
1 ~
.
COIWIIViUNICATlQlVS ~
, ~~eo
r-. ►1%a
Niarch 16, 1993
Spokane Cotua ty Dlanning Department
Nortr 721 Jefferson
Spolcane, washington 99260
Attn: Current Planning Sec-Lion
Re : Midilome - 8 'u-h Addi ~ian/Bowdish axld 38th.
Dear Sir:
The util?ty easemen-ts wi-thin che above reFerericed short plat
will be suriicient for U S wEST Communicati-ons. we would
also 1-ike to place our p? ant prio?- to cu?-bing and paving join•tly
w? th jaashington Water PowEr in the cus tomer' s-trench .
Sincerely
K. A. Kause
NIa1lagAr - Engineex-; ng
lq0rtl1 904 C01UxI1lDU.S
Spokazie, WaslliTigton 99202
(509) 455-2779
cc : Simpson Enginc-ers, Inc.
Nor th 909 Ai gonrie Road
Spokaiie, Wa shiaigton 99212
mw
i ~
N impson 1'nc)ineefs, Inc. Pt D
CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS v~U'f O
N. 909 Argonne Road • Spokane, WA 99212 SPCSKANE COUNTY
(509) 926-1322 • Fax: 926-1323 PLA4~; ~NG DEPARTMENT
TO: S -pak c, .i c, ~ LA;zs~
SUBJECT: r-1;~,•low•e ~ T''~' ,oAA.
DATE: S f Zs-/9 3
A -~-A-acj ct i -,a4~-y o:F .Uns
r-A u P, 91.T ~ .
Slgned -
SPOKANE C'~~~TY PLANNTNV DEPA~TMENT
~ Y
YA■ i..s. ~f_i F' 3
s _
FI• lL~L PLA# f STI4~RT PLATf BSP A+i~J ! IEW P~f/ ►1 N+~<.: t
T
P~,.,I~lT~ SP N/~ME; z •f Len~
IN ~~BMITTAj. R~ ~~RE~~~TS
1. Ni.rie (9) copies of the propo.sed final plat with ded.icarion, Parce1 NQ.
2. Three (3) c-opies af the final p1at certificate (not crlder than six manths of
anticipared ~'~ling date.)
3. Prop►errty outlined ira red on a current Spokane County Assessof s Map(s), with
surveyoi'S stamp vf assurance,
4. An approved Water Plan or letter of wacer system adcqLaacy from Builciing &
Safety Departrment, water purveyor, fu•e district, Health District, etc.
5. Letters of easement acceptance fmrri uti.lity puarveyors.
A) Phane
B) Wat:er
~ C) Gas
D) Electricity
E} Sewer
6. Current rt;view fee of $ - Receipt No.:
_ 7. +County'Treasuxer - taxes paid? (Required bcforr, Board sign-off.)
t- 8. Detailed la.nrisca.pe pIan vvith bond to construct (if applicable), fpr PUD's
especia]ly.
DEPAR.TMENTAL RE'4IEW AND COMMENTS
Healt:h T]istzict Date:
Engineees Office Date:
UtiDities Degartment - I)ate:
Buildirlg & Safety Departinent Dace:
Water Purvveyor Date:
Sewer Purrreyor Date: a
F1re D15tr1ct DaEe:
C F•IE C 1{.El,
FLANNLh1C RFVIEW CG4MMEN'FS SY DA'fE
1. Maps cir+culated to: Building & 5af'e!ty ,sewef purveyor
EngIneer'soffice_ , He:allth District , U61fies '
2. Final plat Leroyed andl'or legible
3. Subdivasion name Sectionn..?_~ ,
°Township Range&
4. Natarized si ~~~fuir~ ~f'Vv~~l~ington.-r~g,istere.d surveyor ~
5, Sheet size:I i"24" x,3+5" far p1at/BSP an+d 18" x 24" for shtrt plat ~ -
6. 1'`orrth arr~~:ri~I ~cale~r1" _ 56, 1" ~ 100', V _ 200')
- 7-7
7. Bvld baundary li.ne of plat/BSP
S. Locati+on and width of propcased ~~ets, ri,ghts=of-way, easements, ; .
open space; indZcate 1-foot strips
.9. Street name(s) ~ -
10. Check lot sizes compatible with plat approva~ ~d Zoning
Ordinance/Code {PAGE 1 of 2
r •
CHECKED
PLANWING REVIEW COMMENTS, CONTINUED BY DATE
11. Appropriate frontagelsetback per zone standards at building line
for cul-de-sac lots
r12. Layout, lot and block numbers, di.mensions of Iots and area of lot .~L
13. Check dedication for conditions of preliminaryplat approval
14. Check restrictive covenants for Ordinance conflicts
15. Number and type of units with conditions of approval ~
16. Landscape plan confonms to approval (PUD) 17. Check PUD setbacksJfencing
18. Check easements, clouds on property, etc., from certificate to
plat /
19. Check for compliance rth Shorelines Management Act ~
20. Existing zoning is changed to 21. Taxes paid? _
22. Legal description proofed (title report to dedication)
23. Review comments to sponsor/surveyar ,
24. Proper fornnat for sheet setup
25. BOCC Resolution typed and proofed
COMMENTS:
G"V
~ ' ~ .c.~ ~l'fj-•_ -
Zi I- i;: . _ ~/'f ►
i, r .Z.- . •ti~ l n.^C L ~ l..t c-. .
~4~
J
Y-
O ' ! r' /1/ ~ ~ . r J . /
'Je
~ • - i
~ l l S' 3
.
. - ' , ~ •
~o~►o, ~ ~t. s _
PAGE 2 or 2
~ 03i05-"93 15:37 '$`509 7477987 IP&L Z002
. . .
~
~ Iillaild
Power & Light Company .
,
320 Fast Scc:ocid Avenue
P.O. Box 4429
Spokanc, Wdshington 99702 ~
7'elCphonc (509) 747-7151
FA Y (5091 747-79&7
March 11, 1. 9 9 3
Spokane County Pla►nning Commission 721 North Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99260
Gent:l emen :
`:l'llis is ta advise you that adequate easeme:rit.s have been secure-d for
t-he i nsta 1 l.at .ion oi' electY• i.ca :1 service to your Plat No. Midilome VIII Addition owned by Midilome Tnc. in Section 33, Towmship 25
Nort-h, Range 44 E.W.M.
Sincerely,- ~
INLAND POWER & LTGHT COMPANY
oral L. Hamilton
Fie7d Fngineer
OLM/mmh
~ ,
6 -
impson E8nca
CBVII. EVGIPIEERS AND LAND Sl1RVEYORS
N. 909 Argonne Road •..Spokane, VVA 99212
. (509) 926-1322 a Fax: 926-1323
TO:
To v►•~. l~ i c.
SUBJECT: 1--,1 o i t,..,o t,~-j.E
DATE: C/ 2/4 3
I Lo w. P T K
►o~c~.r l« ~ ue
Slgned • .
i
~
_ . . , . . _
. ' L . . . . . ~ , _ f
. _ - . _a
..-y.si
. , '
~
' i
WashliS~gto~ ~atee' Power
I
Februar.y 10, 1993
M.fi. lJuanF HGIt
Simpsun Enginc:ers, Inc,.
N. 9.09 Argurlrie tzd _ 1
Spokane, WA. 99212 ~
F'tes Midi.l.arnH $C1i. Aclcliti.un {
i
Uea r Mi. Hel t:
F5ncla.sPd is a rettirn cony o-f the above --me-nti:oned plat.
Pursuant to your telophone conversation with Dan Walsh,, The Washitigton Water
Power Company respec:tfully raquests that the 13' st-rips be identif'icd as "utility I
easements" as shown in rei3 on t4p enclosed map..
f'1ease add tne follewing dedication language fo this plat s
i
Utility easements are hereby granted to the serving uta:lity ,
~ compa:m.ies over ttie private, road and uti-lity essement -µreas
, as plAtted•and shown hereon.
Tf our of f i;ce- cen :be of further as9is,tance, please c:6n~taet 'me at 4E32-8516.
Si.nce:cel:
~..L-,./~r v..-•
.
Uon82d J,. Ma1dsan"i, SR'/WA
Supervisor. Rea1 Estate
EncLusure
cQ: Snokane Coiinty Planning DPpartmPnt
The.WashirlgtOn Water Ppwer.COmpuny• _P.O. Box•37,27 " 5pokane, Washinglon 99220 i509)-489=p5IID,/ 1,800-72?=917,0 SERVING EagYEiRN.WtiSNINt3TON AND;NORTHEqN, IDAN0.1N1TN,E LECTRIClTY ANNATURAI GAS~
_ _ - ~
. ~
MRY-18-~'0-3 TI_lE 15::-14'. l.D': SSPOItPHE UALLEY F iRE TEL N0': 509 92?'=22.? P5-36 Po1
- ~ SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPAUMENT ~
~ Spokane County Fire , Protection. Dlstrict.'No.
~
EAS'T 1p3W SPftArUE AVE • SPO'K.ANE: wk99.206 •(5Q4) 028=4700 • FtJC (504) 927-222,7 1 ~
~
Ra6 TodroW
Chle1
May 18, 1993
Spahane County Planning
W , 1026 Hroadwa.y
spokanc, Wa. 992-60
'I, LYti : Thomas Vel jic, Planner ~I
Re: PE-1168-78 Midilome 8th Addition
N.o requirements. OK to releasQ.
Sincerely,
Kavin Uphus Inspector I
,
KU/bd - ` - - ~
, -
i
PAY 19 1993 ~
' i
, SF
Sp oIc A rT E o~.A~,~TMENT ~
. _
UTlL1T[ES;'DEPARTMENT o A:DIVISION:OF THE PUBL(C "W.ORKS DEPARTMENI'
William R.-Dobratz, I'.E., Director ' Dennis M. Seott, P.E., Directar
,
ME,MOR•AN D U M
~~~**~***~****~******~~*********~*'*****~******.~r~*~.************~**:
****~********.**.*.*~r*~t*******~**************************~**,**.*******, ,
TO: Thomas Veljic, Planning Department
~
FROM: Jim Red, Utilities Department
DATE'.: May 19 , 1993
RE: Review of Final Plat PE-1168-78
Midilome 8'th Addition
Tom
Approved plans have been submitted for the above mentioned
.final pl-at, how.ever no security ha_s been received. The Utilities
Department -does not appro.v..e.f1nalization of this plat,at th_is time.
Thank you.
I
~
~
~
N. S1I_jefferson ~Spokane, WA 99260-0I.'80 (5,09)`456-3604 FAX (509) 456-4715 .
. . JI
1
. ~
I.
- i.
_ • , , ~
' _ • _ ,•'~,~„Z,•~'-- "~f' u.,yY,~'' ,►1=s e''~% ~"~.-----t. . , .,~-c,. "
~ - ' - - - - f•~':a
d 014WE , W
coMMc/NrCArIoN.s @ +
. ~
►
y,
Mar_c.t) ].u, 1993
SpL:.kalzr C-'_ottljti~~ tcrieraL-
IVor ~.h 721 Jcff cr. son ~
Spuk ane, b~~a-a1 a s nq,U-~ ~1 9 91 6.0
Att_n : Ciarr..e,nr_ :?].ann-inq Section
Re: Midi lOme ti t h Ac:Icl.t ioi:/Eawd:i:.c,'.ri ar►rl 38't b. ~
D ea r S.i. r :
I
The utilit-y ea,;ements w-i-thin -tnP aboti•e referenced sboXZ p1a,:t ~i
will be. suffici.~-nt ;:t7r U S WEST Comuauricatiaris. We wt vu].d ~
a.lso like to place aur p.lant pr:ior to curbing and -pavi:ng,, jUint-l-y wi:th Wash ingt-4n tdz-, i:Fr flower I n the cias,t.amer' trench, ~
~
y ~
_i
k . h . Kl L:se •
r'j~IltaCj'E?_:L' ° EIiyincerincr . ~
North ~9'04 Culumb;us ~
Spakane, Was'hington 9 9 2 0;2 ~ 5A 1:~ ~ 4 aJ- 47 7 7 .
i
cc.: Sin►n.sorl -Engil:eers, Inc.
NUrtfi 909 Ary~onne Road
SpoY.ane., wa,?t:;.ngt:on 99212
mw
M ~
I
~
l • ~
SPOKANIE COUNTY IiGALl-H DISTRiCT
ENV~ROhdMENTAL liEALTH OIVISZON
Inte r-of~~~~ ~ommu n ication
~ DA1"EJune 3, 1993
TO: Thomas Vel j i c, Pl anner 1, Spokane County
FROM: ~teven P 1io7der47 R.S. - Fnvi ranmenlal liea Ith D'ivision,
~~~~ECT; Rcvi ew of Fi na'f Plat: PE--1168-78 Midilome 8th Addition
All Health Distric1: conditions o' app~ova1 have been satisfied by the sponsar
of thi s Pla'L.
0
. r,
r~ .
k _
L ~ . S
~ +l
~
~
0088SJ' 47/ gs
f
~
I
i - ~
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Interoffice Memorandum
~ DATE: September 11, 1991
vT0: lorne Lakshas, Planner I, Spokane County
FROM: Steven P. Holderby°'R.S., Environmental Health Oivision, SCHD
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Midilome 5_ -ON, PE-1168-78
The Health District has no objection or additional conditions to this
extension of time request.
ISC
I~l~
~ O
s ? )99 ~ 1
~
0023
r ~
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN THE MATTER OF A MODIFICATION )
TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ) FINDINGS OF FACT
EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR ) CONCLUSIONS AND
MIDILOME SOUTH, PE-1168-78, AN ) DECISION
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT )
THIS MATTER, a modification to a previously approved extension of time has been decided
upon by the Spokane County Planning Department, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision
regularion (Chapter III, Section G) and RCW 58.17.140.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering
this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning.
2. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on
August 8, 1989.
3. The remaining unplatted gortion of the Midilome Subdivision was redesigned and the name
changed to Midilome South consisting of 1681ots on approximately 60 acres.
4. During final plat review for Mid.ilome 8th Addition, which is a portion of Midilome South,
the Spokane County Planning Department discovered that an expiration date was not
specified in the Extension of Time Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision dated
September 24, 1991. Time extensions may be granted for up to three year periods if
continual progress is made towards finalizing all or portions of the preliminary plat of
record. This preliminary plat should be granted a maximum three year extension retroactive
to the date of the previous time extension approval, or October 1, 1994.
DECISION
Based upon the above noted Findings of Fact and Conclusions, Amended Conditions for PE-
1168-78, Midilome South is hereby APPROVED until the expirarion date of the preliminary
plat of record on October 1, 1994, ,subject to the remaining conditions of approval. Most of
the conditions of approval shall be accomplished by the applicant andJor sponsor prior to
finalization of the subdivision. This decision is final unless appealed in writing, consistent
with adopted appeal procedures.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1 Additional Extensions of Time shall not be granted unless substantial compliance with
Chapter III, Secrion G, of the Subdivision Qrdinance is demonstrated by the applicant;
otherwise the preliminary subd.ivision approval will become null and void.
2. All previous condirions imposed by the Board of County Commissioners in the Findings
for PE-1168-78, Midilome South are still valid and shall be complied with upon finalization
of any phase of this plat.
3. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years from the last date of
expiration and approval of a time extension, specif'ically to October 1, 1994. The applicant
may request an extension of time by submitting a written request approximately forty-five
(45) days prior to the above expiration date.
V
Extension of Time Findings PE-1168-78 Page 2
d~
DATED THIS /3 DAY OF MAY, 1993.
PEDEkSEN
enior Planner
For: Thomas Veljic, Planner 1
Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be
scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must subnut a letter along with the appropriate processing
fee payable to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the
date this decision is signed.
If you have any questions, please ca11 the Planning Department at 456-2205.
c: County Engineer
County Utilides
County Health I?istrict
County Building & Safety
Midilome, Inc., 400 South Jefferson, Suite 333, Spokane, WA 99204-3143
Simpson Engineers, 909 North Argonne, Spokane, WA 99212
I
~
-t
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION )
OF TIME REQUEST FOR ) FINDINGS OF FACT
PE-1168-78 MIDILOME SOUTH ) CONCLUSIONS AND
AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY ) DECISION
PLAT. )
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Midilome, Inc. has been received and
decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and
RCW 58.17.140.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this
decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning.
2. The subject preliminary plat which originally included Midilome Sth, Midilome 6th and a
redesignated area now known as Midilome South, was approved by theBoard of County
Commissioners on August 8, 1989.
3. Spol:ane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of rime for the
expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department
policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Secrion G of the
Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision.
4. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the
locarion is within the Prioriry Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designarion
remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval.
5. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and
departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health District, County
Utiliries and the Department of Building & Safery.
6. This is the second request for a time extension for the newly designated Midilome South.
The total life of the preliminary plat has been approximately 5 years. The original preliminary
plat included what is now referred to as Midilome Sth, Midilome 6th and newly designated
Midilome South.
7. The following facts are also relevant.
a. Since the last time extension was granted, 71 of the original 168 lots have been
finalized through Midilome Sth Addition (341ots) and Midiloxne 6th Addition (37 lots).
CONCLUSIONS
BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the eacpiration
date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made.
1. The applicant has made demonstrable progress toward filing the final plat. In review of the
preliminary plat file and the criteria established to consider an extension of time, the
proponent has shown that a three year extension of time is warranted and should allow the
proponent adequate time to complete the final plat.
2. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with
Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional
extension of time.
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for
application PE-1168-78 is hereby APPROVED.
I
,
. ~ . + . . -
Extension of Time Fin; os File No. PE-1168-78 Page 2
DATED THIS 27 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1991.
Lorne Lakshas +
Planner I
enclosure
Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be
scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with $100 processing fee,to the
Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the date this decision is
signed.
If you have any questions, please ca11 the Planning Department at 456-2205.
c: County Division of Engineering and Roads
County Division of Utilities
County Health District
County Division of Buildings
Midilome, Inc., 400 S. Jefferson #333, Spokane, WA 99204
Simpson Engineering, 909 N. Argonne Road, Spokane, WA 99212
File
KGGA-PE-1168-78/EXT T7ME FN9DGS-9/23J91
~
~
. _ ~ .
' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
f~!' = t~,
„
~r' ,fi!'={.•n"vi-'` BROAaWAY iFNTRE BU;LOING N. 721 JGFFERSON STREET
PNONc 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
ti{'GnAWP C i?!Iti;r C0 tl::' tlUSC
MEMORANDUM
'PO: Spokane County County Engineer
v'Spokane County Utilities
VSpokane County Health District
~,.Spokane County Department of Building & Safety
Fire Protection District No. 1
Model Irrigation I?istrict
FROM: Loren Lakshas' Planner I ~
---7
, ~
DATE: August 19, 1991
.
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Midilo .5aA-ddition, 7-'1168-78
~
~
The Spokane County Planning Department has received the atxached request for an
Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Midilo 5~ Addition; PE-1168-78.
~
If you have comments on the proposed extensiori`or believe-addidonal conditions should be
made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments by September 4,
1991.
Tbank you.
kc
c: Midilome, Inc., S. 400 Jefferson #333, Spokane, WA. 99204
Enclosure
'1~~`".` ( ~ ; ~ ` ~ `'Y't, r ~ i . \ , ~ 1 ` ~C,z'
PLAIVNIIVG DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILOING rV 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPONANE COUNTY GOURT HOUSE
August 5, 1991
Midilome, Inc.
W. 606 Third Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99204-1486
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE-1168-78 Niidilome-5th-A7on-
~
~
Our files indicate that your preliminary subdivision is soon to expire October 1, 1991.
In order to extend the preliminary approval, you must apply for an Extension of Time by
complering the attached fonn. The Planning Department will review the file for an
extension and after review and comments from the County agencies will make an
administrative decision whether to approve or deny an extension. Also, the County
agencies may request additional, new conditions during their review to bring the proposal
up to current standards. Your subdivision efforts are measured against the criteria
established in Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance
(enclosed).
A fee of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), payable to the Spokane County Planning
Department, must accompany your application to cover the cost of the tune extension
request.
This certified letter will be the only reminder from our office. The preliminary subdivision
will become NULL & VOID on the expiration date if an extension is not approved. In
order to process an extension request, it will be necessary to receive an application by
August 20, 1991.
If you apply for an extension, you will be notified when a decision is made.
d4lt-
Paul F. Jensen
)Senior Planner
kc
Enclosure
c: Simpson Engineering, N. 909 Argonne Road, Spokane, WA. 99212
Rev 1/90
r , -
* -
_
~ - ~ -
so \1 ~ s r ~ ~l s
90 ~
~
, 32iYD AVENUE
% - - - - ,
3 4 ~S to /J r z l3 ~ i
,
Ty
~ .'-~'°..i-" ~a 1 ~ ,
7 4 i z :5 'y s c r ~7 n t 7 i
~
Existing Portion
/ n u ~S 7 n ,s h g ~r ~1 c ~
.
ylidilome Addition
j j~ ~2' ~3 l+! / L ~ i
~ z
! /j ~ • q ~ 4 r ~i I ! f i
13
/ ~ ! 7
15
O
aC ~ ~ /t 21 q I ^
y
n e
a
% i 9 ~9 ,y I,~ ~i • -1~- - - ~ r
t 6 ~ y 20 rl a
< ~ ~1 >e f
4
13 19 S ' a ~2 r 2r xo
JQ 18 ~ f
rS ~0 9 8 17 9 ~ 17 ~
zy I Zs ) i3
~
13 II'l
, 40TH AVENUE
~
S4URCE: Ciarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. `
PLAT DE',SIGN
h ~
~
a "","H 0+ c+vr,axv-. 1.4 ~ 1200 Fcec ~ i
C.~ni~1~.r.~~i in ♦•~~vnl~~ht~ri~~~ ~~~.dy.~. Nla+i.~i~~r ~~.~~~.~•ni~ ~
/
f
~ ~ ~ r~ u ~~s . . ` . _ ~ - ` . 1 J'~ r~~ \ f~ ~ i f ~ f t ~
~ I~. f 1 ~ f . ~ ~ ~ , ~ v r ~ _ ~ ✓ r ~i G~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ 4 "G ~ ~ _ - _ _ _ a _I { 1 1 ~ . ~ ~ ~4 8
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ 1 J \ , . . ~ cr 4 Ili 413; ci; lr CY ~ I
~ tl ~ I ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ti,~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ I i~'' I r'~'~ ~ / rC ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ i ~ - ~ - - ~ ti t ~ ~ j ~,v ~ r ~ 4 ~ . ~ k ~ ~ ~ A~'i ~ o ~ ~
~ I_~~_ - i t~ . . ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~f ~ ~ ~ I.I ~ T ~ \ 'L i+ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ti r' ~L \ f r ~C~ - ~ _ ~r
y I I I I ~ ~r ~ - , i f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I l , ~ r f ' ~p~ 0. . ~
~ A ~ _ - - - -~1 ~ ry 1 , . ~ ~ ~q ~ O Q f ~ ! 'a~'r~ '!3 9 I ~ _ - - _ _ - - I + 1 1 ~ { f ~ ~ Q _ ~ ~ A, . . ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 1 ~ ~fl ~rtJ'~ ~ .9 * ~ 91~~~ !
I ~ 1 r I ~ { w M q ~y ~ ~J1 ~ ~ 1 e r r \ i 7y , . I ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~j 4 ~e ` + ~ - '~d ~
a I ` ~ _ f ti . f r ~ \ 4 M ~ RO p ♦ ~ ~r~ 'a, ~ r., _ _ _ _ _ ~ 1 ti . e~ l \ \ t ~ t ~ ~ I ti . ~ f ~r ~ ! ~ ~ ~ , 1 ~ 4 > y~ yn tiP OP
I ~ 1w ~ ~ f'~ ~ ~ C.~ V~ ~ p d a ~ 1 ~ ~~►Y~1 . ~ ' ~'ry7 q ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~'1 r~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- I I ~ ,r r " ~ f 1 ~ ~,J 7 9ai ~ If ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ' ' 1 ' ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ _ .J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F, ti _ ~ r r ~ ~ ` . ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~ p. tids a> ~ ~S Y ~yd . ~ S 1 ~ S a~
~ ~ ~ r ~ ` 1 ~ , Ii -q. 3b ~ I
- - - - _ ~r- ~ ti 1 ~ 4 ` h f~+ 4 ~ ~ , ` Ia r~ ~ f~. Ib sa , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~ ~ I ~ ~ M 1 ~ ~ $ ~ P ~ ~ ~c,r ~ ~ ~ 'b 4~ . , a I 1 1 1 ► i+~ 1~ '~'L u . I ~ I i ti ~ ~ , - ~ ~ d • 7-7? IM
i I M1 Qf' 4 I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M1 ~ ~ ti~~' r ~i ~a q~ S~ ~i~, a~ 3~5. 1 s ~ I 1~ a ~ a _
~ ~ ~ ~ { ~ $ ~ ~s ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
G c ~s ~.i ~a U ~ ~s~' 4'tl'~ 1 9S L~ $`5 a ~G 65 ~ C ~ ~ s ~ o ~ r ''y , L~! f
n'~ ~ ~"i Q+ ~ ' ~ d I N i ' ~ ~ ~ r~] t ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ P °y t 4 ! 1~ r~ ~ kft 0
P ~ fi ` d7 ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ I - a~ ~ ~ F~ r , , . ~ c~ - , A y ~ ~ ~ ta f ~ _ . i a t+ ~----~~o + ~ a t
, 8t, 8a ~ ~ ~ #3 vr ~ g ~5 ~a°~ ~ a r;~ ,r~ s~r o 4 ~ ~a ~ ~
, . • ~ a S ~p a ~ r I v ~ Q+ ~ ~ / 4~a 1"~, r a' - s~l ~6 - (a . ~ 1~ ~ ,
~ ~'~--ti ~ ~ j ~ ~ ° ~ ~s ~ ~ ~ i7 ~ N ~ . , 14 iC r~ ~ • C' 'a V lr I~ 1P ~ ~ ~ +1+ - ' 4~p
, ~t w . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ a~ ~ t - I v~ ~ ~ ~ ~a , ~s q~ x s 2 w ~ 4 ~ ~a v ~ , ~b ~ ~ ,~.s ds ~6 ~ 4lad ~ ,
,r,r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ p r ~ tL'~ o . ~ ~ i~ 5~~q ~ ;r ~ ;~P` . , b r ~ aa ~ ~ ~ ~ Z~1 r ` ~ ~ ~M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ ~ ~
~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ 32 ~ 4~ 8s ~ 1 , i~ o ~ .~cs l~ ~ ~ a$"S as
r ~ Sa.. t r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ „ o ~ ~ r~ ~c, ~ ~ t y ~b p ~ . ~ pr i~1 U~
~ ~ ~ a~ 1 k r e ~j' 4 ~ ~ ~i ~ (r ~ ti~ ~ ~ ! , C T ~ ~1 ~ 4A r ~~3 ~ V! t(] lq 4°~ ~ 4 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ i ~ %-I CIO
` ~ ~ N ~ 5~ ~ ~a ~1 ~ f ,a ~ _ T Z'~ ~ ,~o ~ a ~1 + , ti.~rS a n ~ ~ fl~ ~7 ~a #"~o ~ t'L~ u"5 !~'s - ~ i ~ ~ ~a 6+~ u S ~ ■ ~ - ,2 , ~ ;
';C I ~ 4 f ~l ~ u . q ~ ~ t ~ ~
~ ~ i 4 ~ ~ ` + ~ ~ ~ q 'f'p ~ l ti R I ~ ~ ~ xn 5 ~ ~s ~ ~ $ Q 22 w '~l I ~ 12 OZ J ~
. . r . . r f ~ ~ y~ ~ ~g ~ ~ ~ ~ `t~.' ~P h a ~ 0 ~ - ' . f r Q ~ ~ 0 - - . . ~ ~ _ ! ' n ~ 1l~ ~I S Ls L's
a ~ ~ ~ ,;s~: ~ _ c~ t 3 - ~ '~,c, ~ '~t'~ ~ ~ '3c.a ~k 9 3 l+ . . , . . 2 +r, ~ ~ fl v . ~ ~ ti ' E _ ~4 4~ P Y _ . ~ . _ . , i-
~ ~c o l t ~'~S ~i~ ~'15 $5 , ~4 t~ ~~S 1 [ a, rf iG~s • 90 ~ tu ta s: st 4 _I1 r „ - . - - _ ~
' M
~ i I ~
~ ~ I F i
~ ~
I
~
I
l ~ '
~
1
! ~
Aq~ ~
~ 1 ' I
II
I
~ ION5,. I
. ~
, ~ ' • ~
t" - . • _ ' ~ ' F°1 , ~-y_ ~ ,~~i
. R F ~ , • ° • . 1 .
a , - . - ~ -+•~%i~*. -1• ~ _ ~ - , 4-• . , . . . .
~ . - ~ . ~ ~ . , ' , ~ . - ~ , ~ , . ~ . ~ . ~ .i ~,~wir*.. - . . i _ Y; ~i~ 't~~~ , "ti , a~ , . •A~* ~ . . ~ , . ~,"s. _ . a ~ , ' . ^ . . `9..- * ' ~ • 4~ . . . . . 1 . . I . i. ~ i,:~ ~
• , ~ 1
PFELIMINARY PLAT AU G16 1991
EXIETSIG'N OF TIME FORM
S?U1tANE
f'U'1NNlNu DEPA?T:'., ~
Plat Nunber: PE-1168-78 Plat Name: MIUILOME SOUTH
Number of Lots : 168 Number of Ac.res : Approx. 60
Sporisor: Mid ilame , Inc. Prcw.pe,.._T-ty Ow-ner : Midilane, Inc.
Address: S. 400 Jefferson # 333 P,ddress; S. 400 Jefferson # 333
City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99204 City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99204
phone No: (509) 623-1000 Phane No: (509) 623-1000
Engineer/Surveyor: Simpson Engineers (.fl u(?k
Address; N. 909 Argonne
City, State, Zip; Spokane, WA 99212
Phone No: 926-1322
PHASID PRO=
(M BE CCrIPLE,M ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEIM LZE,VEIfJPID AND FZNALI ZID IN PHASES)
Ntarber of lots originally approved : 168
Nunber of phases f ina 1i zed to date: 2
Nutber of lots renaining to be finaLized: 117
Number Of acres reft : 39
****t*******
PIEASE PFOIDE US WITfi ZHE FOLI.AfinNG WOFd►ATICN
Briefly sumnarize the progress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be
f ina lized ( i. e., phys ica 1 c6n.s truct ion, banding f or inprovene.nts, suryr..~yinq
and drafting work, acoarpLishing various departrrental requirements, abta; n; nq
ar granting easements, etc. ) Since our last extension we have ccxnpleted two
development ghases, Midilame Sth and Midilome 6th
adding an additional 71 lots. Plans are naw being
generated'to complete Midilame 7th.
~
~
Signed:
: can urveyor
~ .
,
MIDILOME, INC.
S. 400 Jefferson, Suite 333 AUG 16 1991
Spokane, Washington 99204-3143
(509) 623-1000
FAX (509) 623-1375 PLANN!iNU ~~PARTN+LM
August 13, 1991
John Pederson
Spokane Planning Department
N. 721 Jefferson Street .
Spokane, Washington 99260
RE: Plat Extension
Midilome 5th Addition
Enclosed please find the Ext ion of Time Form for
PE-1168-78 Midilame ,5th ' r3- along with our check
nLUnber 1367 in the amount of $100.00.
-r _ .
Robert H. Tomlinson
RHT:mb
Enc. 2
I
,
~
1
j
; .
6
,
J r _
_ - - - - - - -
~ J~~ j • . / ~ ~
- R: E~CEI~P T 1 -Date 19 2553
- .Recei e~d;From~~~~~~LCP~ •
~ Addres 4m
~
ON -Do I I cs rs $ /o - &b I
Fo r -7-l ' ~ ~ w • ,
ACCOUNT } HOW PA{D . y -
AccOU~NT I CASH ~ I ~=~p «~Y P~G DEPAAT~dY~NJ ~ -
.p AMT PAID & `7 CHECK
°D BALANCE MONEY ~ I Bv A-/ '
Y.
~ DUE I ORDER
- - - . - ~ i
I
~
c
~
r
PFELIIMffNARY PLAT . .
E;XTENSICN OF TIME FORM - , .
~
plat IJtu►ber; pE_1168_78 Plat Name: MIDILOM~.' STH ADOITION Nunber of Lots : Number of Acres :
Sporisor: Mi d i 1 ome , I nc . Prvpesty Owner : Mi d i 1 ome, I nc .
Address: W. 606 Third Avenue Address: W. 606 Third Avenue
City, State, Zip: Spokane, W~. 99204-1486 City, State, Zip: Spokane, Wa. 99204-1486
Phone No: (509) 624-9131 Phcme No: (509) 624-9131
Engineer/Surveyor: S i m ps o n E ngi ne e r i ng
Address: N. 909 AVgonne Road
City, State, Zip: Spo kane, Washinqton
Phane No: (509) 926-1322
********~t*~
PHASID PR.17DC.''
(TO BE aC!►+n= C'fiiLY IF Tf-iE PIAT IS BEING DEVEIOPID ANID FINALI ZID IN PHASES )
N~.r of ?ots xi_l?y appro:*e?: 412 acgrcximately
Nunber of phases f ina liDed to date: 5
Number of l.ots remamung tA be f inali zed: 140 a Qp ro x i m-Jte 1 y
Nimber of acre.s r : 50 more or less
PIEASE PIDI'I'E US hffTH THE FULLCFiTII3G nOICROMCN
,
Briefly sunmarize the progress made, to dabe, in PreParirg the Plat to be
f ina li Ded ( i. e., p►hysica 1 oa-isstructi.on, bonding f ar inprovesnerits, surveying
and draf ting work, acoatqalishing varicxls departmenta-I requirements, obtaining
oac granting easenents, etc. )
14i i m is a larve Dlat oriqinallY consisting of 160 acres. We are just
comoleteinq work on the 4th addition (5th phase). We have completed
devel opinent of 200 ± homes a nd a re conti nu i ng to devel op o n the c,ri g i nal
phased basis.
;
%
.
~
signed: ~
can Surveyor
J 0 SENbER: CompWe 'rtQms 1, 2,31 and 4.
In
0 Put yor.tr dddrRta in thr "AE'fURN fiCl" uoaC4 r
3 rwfrra rtdr. Faliurr ra da ihls wilt o-vnrent thiw ram ~
biing 1a1U►►k4d RO y4u. Thi I'+irUrn fxoidt iat wFli PrCwIdR
~i you the Mart1! 4} tha p9r's4n c3s9ivQrW Ca and thf doTi Df
j daiivary. ipr addlti0nal tiM the fpll0vrinp wr+ic91 Iro ~ ~ ~ ~ 060 858
~ ireilable_ C#noule ptas~rna~ow ft~r fN~ and chicJ+ CDa(w)
~ lar "rvice(s) requMlMCi. _
1. 11 Show to whom, date and addirru of dNlvwV, ,
Mrr
❑~1~tfN.~ D'~lIYoTv, I # *f
N' ef'~htAY I(1IM4O h4,Ni
3. Article AdQretW w
1,3 1✓IKJ%h~tl
ivo ~~l~Q"Nt6trwt .nd Na. C~l 5 n~ C~~
~ -U~p - 99201 P,0. staca and zIP codl. -
a. Typ* al Sorvicv: Articf} Number a
Pa~oge ~
0 Reqi¢tered 0 {nwred .
Cerlified El COD Corelllid Fer
~ Express hAsil
A1wayi obtam iign8turo 4} bddrASSe4gr agen1 and i~p~elrl Orlbv~ry Fe1
DATE DEIIVERED,
Addrasi" R+wRrSt't~d aelbawY FH ~
ReturnReealpzShcwinp
m _ to whom and Da" DOIIVOtd ~
~ . Sipnaturo -Agene RetwrnRecelptShawinqtowtwom,
~ x ~ bete, and,4ddress of Dernrer+y
~ l. Dem pf DrJlwwy
~ T'f7tA~, P~r wr~ Fos ~
z S. Addriss"`s addrm fONL Y Of n-Q'LtL?TJCd Q fE8 pa y;. Pestmerk or t]ste
fn aa
tI
~
~
L
. . ,
- ~4w
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
i _ BROAOWAY CENTRE BUIIDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
5
;I
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANC COUnTr COURT HOUSE
June 25, 1986
Midilome, Inc.
% Tomlinson Agency
W 606 3rd Avenue
Spokane, WA 99201
RE: Extension of Time for PE-1168-78
Dear Sirs:
Our files indicate that the conditional approval of your preliminary plat
known as MIDILOME 5TH ADDITION i s soon to expi re.
In order to process an Extension of Time, we request that you complete the
attached form. The Subdivision Administrator will review the file for an
extension and after review and comnents from the County agencies, will make an
admi ni strati ve deci si on whether to approve or deny the proposal. Al so, the
County agencies may attach additional conditions during their review.
A fee of $100, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, must accompany your
application to cover the qost of legal advertising and other administrative
costs.
This certified letter will be the onl reminder from our office and a response
would be appreciated by July 18, lalong with the attached form. If we do
not receive any response by that time, we will assume you are not interested
in pursuing an Extension for this proposal and thus will become NULL b YOID.
When a decision has been made, you will be notified.
If I can be of any help to you, please feel fre o contact me.
Si ce 4eo'
OOUGLAS S. ADAMS
Subdi vi si on Admi ni strator
OSA:dj
Enclosure
cc: Simpson Engineers
i .
k
2 ~J ~ _w. { - - , r• /l.,,: r i~/~,~-,- ~i. f ~«r~ f~ 11
~ a . ~ ~ ~ f. . . _ .~r ' , F" ~ ' ~ . r t Jr ~^f~f~~ f/~~ f • f f!// ~ ~f%~~/ %'~~J'f~/~ r ~
~ d P rfgl I YYitY
-y f v"' t hJti7~Vv'.^~
a ' a p Y ~ + ~py~
!p~~e4/~ re•~ Y~
~ lz~/~p G~ ~~L! 1 I
Address ~t~'...~;~e ,
~ . i ~►v~~ ~ ` ~
DOllCBf S 16C~
r ~ FOP" P1~.~, M4W lA
V . ;
ACCC3UNT ~ How PAIa SpQKME COUIYTX P'iANNING D£PAH'TUEN7 -
AMT OF I ~
~ ACCOUNT 4 CASH . , . ,
AMT PAID CHECK f./' - -
• , i BALAIJCE I Mdh1EY B~/
DUE ~ I 1 ORpER I J' J
8K806 I~^lO - -
~
,
i
,
` rF
I