The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1140A-77 - - - - - ~CF.~DAt NOVEAl1B1~4ti 140, _ ~LE P H 0 1VE IN 0 .s 4 5 6 PLANNING COMM1~~~G-1~ Titne: ' Wednesday, Navember 16, 1977, c._00 A.M. Piaee: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex (Use iMaZion Avenue entrance) PE- 1140-77, Pines West (Continued frorn October 14, 1977) ZE= 160r77, Aqriculturai ta Slncrle Familv Residential and/or Two--Familv Residentia1 ~ . , f ~ . ~ p rte a IF- OCP-1[ FI, 09l1 I T r+ ~ ' I~} 7 i 3,r3'' r` •a~i rrb oiy J ' 5~ q a de ~~~h~ i , { 7i n ~~v ~ b ~ ~ I I ~ rl a ~ '~O : f~3,f' 5-~ r}~ _ 0;6 I I I `I w~s► rt+r r ! j err,i• aL i~.`a ~ ~ ° SP6 { ~r~ _ ~ {f I ~ ~ l 1 1 ` I P L r eU r".,p- la.r . r'•• ~ _ f'~"1 ' , ~ t-- . ~ Wi'~ 4 i 7 ~^l ■ , , ~ '~+w Lf7• ar2 /4 LF ~ ~ ` y[~ i r ~ TM } fMS ♦ d n Y ~ ~ 9t"~ } ` ~ ~Y14a~ 'I . ~tl. 1106.0 L__-R4~ TF~~+ Y -7-=~=-e~'~'' wA ~ _ ~ Jf i. 1 • . . . i 'ti~ }t' ~ 11~ `IRY ~r_ . ~i ■ ~ ~ 7iliTfh:.` Tu ~r~.Alr' rr ~~T~ fL~O . ' ' ~ i"'~~.~~..,....._.. ~~i~~I~~I L~`-yMti51[7M IlVC xAO 4 _ 2 A ' ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , t-, , N.. . I~ _ _ aR' u _ ~ ~ _ t r y ~ ~ _ I L i ' . r > « p ti~ ~ ~ a r ~ M ` 'Jr, Y A ti C , .w ~•"4~ ~,s/ ~ ^ ~ ~ ~ n rY`I ~~I~~. fh ~ ~ 9. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'e~. r 1~ t w . ~ ~ o - ICIN-ITY ' V v bV`~ ~ ~ 1 • Y ~ . - , . , ~ ' • I ♦ . ~ ~ • t r ~ ' • ~ i ~ t - ~ .,r r , . , OFFICE `T THE i , ♦f 'y~rt~i~ fti7"'_~~ ~ l ~ M,,+, tfl ~ t I•''~'n S ; ` • 'r 3;4 PLARri~ DEPWrrrr . , • DATE ALYWt Zn ~ ' • • „r : i , , + r SroKANc couNr. couet Mousc . T0: Jin'► Emacio/Rab Binqer, Prosecutina Atto Of ioe FROIN: Douq Ad,am, Subdivision Adnini.strator ~ SMECj; Pines West & Pines West lst Additiaat . I ccsmpleted a site inspection today to see if the fe,nce called for in the Board of Cannissianers order was under construction and found no evid+ence that anything was being done. Therefore, I am referring this matter to yau as indicated in our August 6, 1986 letter to Mr. Guthrie, oapy. attached herewith. ASA: dj Encl,osures oc: Wally Hubbard ~ ~ , • . . . . ° INREROFFICE r'Eh10 ` 'b-' UM ' C0IECK Or1E BW . . M , ; ` f ~,`'t J%"'} ' , - '°i.S o . + ) ~ ~ ~ `i J ~ ~ "I< < q. W, ~ • ' PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET l ~ PHONE 456-2205 ' SPOKANE, WASNINGTON 99260 . ' , l7 , i 1 rt SPOKANE COUNTV COURT HOUSC August 6, 1986 Ralph Guthrie Guthrie Investrnents, Inc. E. 9 211 Trent Avenue Spokane, VA 99 216 RE: Fencing Requirement for Pines West and Pines West lst Aadit.im Dear 14r . Guthrie : The attached letter and map are to advise you of the fencing requireqnent which was itiposed tpari the appraval of these subdivisions. As you may rec,all, Spokane County did not insist upon the erection of the fence last wi.nter to allvw for more fawrable weather conditions for builcling. It is our opinion that sufficient time has elapsed to aocatplish oon- struction of the fenoe. If oonstructicn is not camnenoed within 10 days and carripleted by Septenber 30, 1986, woe will refer the matter to the Spakane County Prosecutar' s of f ioe f ar apprapriate action. S ' ly, ~ DOUCLA.S S. ADiAMS . Subdivision Administrator DSA:dj Enclosures : 1) Ltr. dt. 12/10/85 to Art Noll 2) Map of area to be f enced 3) BOOC Findings & Order & Decision cc: Maribeau Homecwmers' Association J ~ . ; ~ i ~ ~ ' • yy ~!f m a w'* z ~ ~ ~ • ~ ' ` ~ • ~ " ~ ` t0 Q ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~4 v ~ ~ ~ • ~ ( I ~Y 7 ~ r ~ ~ ~ 1 r' ~ • p~~ ~ `,a ~ ~~,1~ a 1 A ~ 9~~ ~ m ~ Q ~j~, ~ ' " jD r► ~ r ~ , 40 1 1 1 ,R ~ pJ a, ~ 1 ~ ~ ( ' ~ ♦ .r ~ ~ , A ~ ~ ~ ~ ' tIs . m s ~ /!~ti f+ S * 1~ j~,4i►~ `y y~i ~ ,r ~ ~V ~ 4K il 4t O rII > ~ ` K ~~'j~` • Q f • ~r(' f i A<<f w • p X ~ E ;3~ 1~ t'~ ~ x 1 ,n ~ •j ~ r ~ ~ z ~ i r ~ r+ j ~ ~ . ^r • ~ ' • r ~ ! i ^ . : Il;f~~},f'•}i ` ~ , ~ L PLANN11VG DEPARTMENT . ; GRQAOY1hY CEHTftE OUILOI14G 1t 721 JErFE(iSON SiAEET •t. ~ 1 I, t PMOHE 456-2205 . ~ ' P r SPOKAfdE. WAS}11NGTON 99260 ' • • p • . . , . tP014nC COUnI• COUtIt FIdUQC December 10a 1985 Mro Art Mol lo Debe1 opment Coordi nator Guthrie Investments, Inc. E. 9211 TrenL Auenue Spokane, WA 99206 RE: Pines West & P g nes 1~~~t First Addfi ti on Fencl ng Reqta1 ~ements Oear Art: In June and July of thig year we diseussed the fencing requl rements that the 8oard of County Comm1 ssl onea^s mmde a part of the subd9 vis9 ons referenced above, In Spokane Caunty Subdivi siQra Fi les PE-114as77 o We di scussed wtiat the Board of Count,y Comiss1 oners required i n terms of fenc inq on tJ1e florthern plat boundar,y bFtween P i nes West c~vel opment and the railroad tracks o I ° ind1 cated to you ina memo dated July 10, 1485, 1 bel1 erred that the feneing requi rEment wvc~l don1,y ~app1y to tte nor~ae~°iy 10t l1 r~es of lots 2~rough 8 g 9? oCk 2 of P 1 ne5 WeSt Ist Additione in thgt those we~e the Only rea9 dei1tial i ots that abutted directly to the railroad tracks e Recentl} I hAVe been contacted by citf zens -t n fthe aw~a who i ndicated to ne that the Board 9ntended that the fAnci ng be al ong the entf re Pines Westi prclfm4neey pla$. Aft~r rewiewing the Board°s findlngs'and cond9t96ns in the Mem g be1 ieve that tJiis v~ ew is ac~urate and that tMe Boar°d had irtended the fericing requirement to r,rn the entlme length of the P1nes West preqlm9nary p1Rt as stic~ in file PE-1140-77. I em enclosing a copy of tl~e Board's F4 Rd4 ngs b Oa°der regarding ttiat prel iminary p7 dt zone reci asgificat! on as wel1 as the Board" s Resol ution for your° review; The resul t of tt1 s rev1 ew Is that Imust ~ithdr°aw my 1etter of subst.antia1 confomence to yaca dated July 70 01985 and advi se you that the ~pocane County Subdivisivn afflce wi 7 i ex ect t~Oat ti~e fence be establ ishEd a1 or~9 ~e northerl ~houndaFomomissioner' ~e r~es' Weprei $~einar a~. As ya~a are awa~^e, t6~e loard oo~sn ~ ty s es ~shea ofiier concfffi ons in rer ationspii to the ~encq ng regarding constructl on methods and iandscaping ta avoi d pa#,ential noise probi ems that mg ght ex1 st. You indicatecf that you 9 ntended to asOc for s Change of Cond1 t9 on to ttie e^equire-wnts for a 6 foot fenceoAny CMange of Cvndit10n request should addr°ess the BQard° s spec9 fic condi t1 ons regard1 ng the fenc1 ng and the bufferi r;ga I t may be that a• 1andscape archi tect Coul dadv! se you and the Spakgne Caunty P1 snni ng DepartmeRL on the advi sab911 t,y of establ f shing a no1 se barrier thwough .s 6foot security fence. at IL r 1 Art Noll Page 2 As I noted in our July conversation that the 6 foot security fence would be allowed one year to be established which would mean that it would be constructed by July of 1986. Thi s i s sti11 acceptabl e and I think that it is proper that the fencing be installed because Pines West and Pines West lst Additions have both been filed and substantial developent has occurred in each of the subdi vi sions. The area residents al so noted other concerns which are more properly handled by the Spokane County Enginee ring Department and the Building b Safety Department. I have asked the Engineering and the Building b Safety Departments to provide me cortments regardi ng those concerns which deal primari ly wi th the Provi si on of si dewal ks at the easterly end of Pi nes West 1 st Addi tion dnd the location of structures within the development which are preconstructed homes moved on to the individual lots. Once I receive these comments. I will forward them to you. Thank you for your understanding jn this matter and if you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. inc rely, ~1?✓, ~ ' DOUGLAS . ADAMS Subdi vi si on Admi ni strator DSA:dJ Enclosure cc: Karen Young for Pi nes West Homeowners' Assoc. • r ! ~ . BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION & ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING ) PE-1140-77, PIfVES WEST - ZE-160-775 AGRICUL- ) COMh1ISSI0NERS' DECISIOfV TURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND/OR ) TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Hodges, Inc. ) This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, to render its decision concerning the request of Hodges, Inc., East 12715 Mission Avenue, Spokane, 14ashington 99206 for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading; and The Board having received no recommendation from the Spokane County Planning Conmmission because of the lack of a quorum vote on said application, as set forth in the Commission's minutes of November 16, 1977; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on December 29, 1977, at the request of Ralph Guthrie Company, East 12721 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, blashington, and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board and consideration of the environmental review, to approve this preliminary plat application subject to the conditions as contained in the Planning Staff Findings, EXCEPT that the following additional conditions shall also be imposed: 1) That duplexes within the plat be limited to the area east of Bowdish Road. 2) That the sponsor provide for a 6 foot security fence along the north plat boundary so as to provide as clearly divided separation from the railroad tracks. 3) That a staternent be placed in the plat dedication that unusually high noise levels may exist in the area during cerain periods of the day. 4) That the plat sponsor make every effort through special con- struction methods' and landscaping to mitigate any possible noise problem that might exist. The plat sponsor is directed to work with the Building Codes Department and the Planning Staff to develop these methods. The Board authorized the Chairman to sign a final declaration of non- significance. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 2 day of March, 1978. VERNON W. "LA C1 rk o~" th oard by : `i~o nne Montague, Deputy C erk 3a ` 1 . . . .pa^yu4A:A71L.K~1Cr:p Y• - • . . p ~1e rl1 w _ . • . • - , 78 814 ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMIISSIONERS QF SPOKANE COL1NTY, ' WAMiMOTON,. FINDIlVGS AND ORDER REGARDIlVG PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZaNE RFCLASSIFICATION, _ PE-11 40-'L PINES_ WEST; ZE-160-77, A~'iRICULT~AL TO SINGLE FANlILY ~E,SIAE~ITIAL AND/OR , TWO FANIILY RESIDENTIAL. , . • WHEREAS, tahe Spokane County Planning Cormiission did, after public hearing A , on NOVEVBER 16, 1977, at which a quorum vote did not occur, forward to the Board ' of County Commissioners a request that the Board set a epecial hearing date (File Number PE-1140-77) the preliminary plat to be known as PINES WEST; and, 0 WHEREAS, the Ralph Guthrie Company did by letter dated NOVEDOW 30,• 1977, 'request a special hearing before the'Board of County Commissioners to preeent evidence and testi.mony in lieu oP no recomtnendation from t,he Planning Comnission , with regard to the above described preliminary plat and zone reelassi.fiCation; and,, WHEREAS, the Board of Count3r Coranissioner did hold a publiC hearing on , . DECII~MER 29, 1977, to consider the preliminary plat known as PMS WST, the re- quest of the plat sponsor and comments of tdle ob,jectors and other i4terested parties; and. WHEREAS, at said heaxing opportunity was afforded those favoring and t,hose opposing the above described preli.minary plat proposal and zone reelassifieation, the Board of County Comissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the testimony given, the records and minutes of the Platuti.ng Commaission, the staff findings of NOVETMER 16, 1977, the environmental checklist, and all other evidence presented, and f.irther having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the conditions contai.ned in the sta.Pf findings were generally valid and sufficient; and, WHEREAS, the Chairma.n of the Board did is9ue on JAIdUARY 31, 1978 a pro- posed negative threshold determination, which was duly cireulated with the environ- mental checklist and staff review to other ageneies of jurisdiction; and, WI-iEREA►S, Grant L. Kimer, did by letter dated FEBRUARY 13, 1978, challenge the issuance of a proposed declaration of non-significance, pointing out numerous alleged potential problem,s associated with existing railroad related noises, as well as possible rnitigating measurea; and, WHEREAS, the Board and vaxioua County staff inembers did confer with regard to P1fr. Kimer's letter, noted the issues raised,r doneidered the proposed declaration of non-significance; and, WHEREAS, the Chairman did issuE a final negative threshold deterinination on FEBRUA.RY 17, 1978; 09 r ,r +r ra i NQW, ~',,FOR~, the Boaxd of County Comnipsic~~ers daes conclude that , the proposed parelim; nary pIat to be ~own as PI~S WEST and zone reclassification ~ Single Fami1y Residential and ri'wo Family Reside~tial shou1d be and hereby is ' approved subject to the Plarning Staff #'indings af NOVEMBM 16, 1977, E~CEPT that, , 'tshe following additional conditions shall also be imposed; . 1} That duplexes withiti the p3at be limited to the area eaat - of Bawdish Road. ` . , 2) That the sponoor provide for a 6 foot secur,ity fen~e alnrxg ' the north plat boundax°y sa as f,o provic~e zk cTearly d,ivided ' . r segaration from the railroad tracks, y r Y 3) That a statement be plac~d in the plat dedication #bat'unuS-uailyr - .k _ li ' high r~oise levels ma.~ exist ~ the area durfrg certa~ pex°igas • . J F of t2le day. Tha.t the plat spansor mate every effart through special com,=' ` ' i k structian metfhods and l.andscapirg to miti~ate any possxble - noise problem that m.ight exist. The p1at sparsar fs di.reoted tv wark with the Building Cod.ea Depar#ment and the p].annfng Staff t4 deVeZQp ~ese ILIe-th4dS, T]dTE~ ~S DAY QF 1978. BOARD OIF COLWN COMMISaIONERS OF SP0WE COWW, WAMMGTON - - ~~~~~~NSER A=,sT: VEMvN w ' Ci rk ard _ BYi zJ r ' - ~•~~•._..i' i ~ I ` ` ` / ~ i 1 / ~ I L i ~ 1 - : • ~ ' I~ ' 't~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~I►~~' r BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 „ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 s « .L• z-4 .r-.~J a _ . - e `i ` `1„ _ f icR--F.7~ ' SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE January 7, 1986 NIE'~MO TO: Board of County Comnissioners FROM: Doug Adams, Subdivision Administrator ~ RE: Pines West and Pines lst Addition Recently we reoeived a letter fran the Maribeau Homowners Association dated Decenber 29, 1985. This association is concerned about various subdivision and building pernlit activities in their area. A response was forwarded to them on Dece7nber 26, 1985, regarding most of the concerns that were raised in their most recent letter. I am attaching a copy of my Decenber 26th correspondence to you for your information. If you desire us to take further action or have questions regarding this develor-nent, please contact Uially Hubbard or myself. Thank you. DA: dj Enclosure ~ )G~,~'r cc: WallY Hubbard, Planning Director . ~t F . l iP-i~~.~ , , I ~ 1 .A.► I ~ 4 . ~ `~7 PLANNI NG DEPARTMENT BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILQING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET + J ~ ~ PHONE 456-2205 ~ . SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKANC COUNTY GOUit7 MOUSE JaluarV 8, 1986 ~l Maribeau Haneawners Association E 11412 Frederick Spokane, 4A 99206 To Wham It May Conoern: I reoeived your correspondence dated Deaember 29, 1985. 0n DeoemUer 26, 1985 I forwarded a letter to Ms. Karen Young regarding most of the concerns addressed in your recent letter. I also en- closed letters froan the Planning Departnent, Engineering Department and Building & Safety DeF►artment regarding the fencing, sidewa]ks and relocated structures. I am enclosing a capy of my letter to NLs. Young and accaTpanying correspondence for your consideration. If you have any questions, please contact me. S' ely, ~ . DOUGLAS S. A,DAMS Subdivision •Adninistrator D6A:dj IIzclosures Maribeau Nomeowners Association E. 11412 Frederick SPGt:anE, Wa. 99106 December 29,1985 Mr. Gou9 Adams /Subdivisic ,n admin. R E C E I V E BraadwaY center N. 721 Jefferson st. JAN 0 61985 SPOkane, Wa. 99260 SPOKANE COu N1 r PLAHNING OEPAR1MfN1 Dear Mr. Adamst Maribeau Homeowners Assaciatian , a non-Profit citizFns QrouP comPrised of residents within the follawine subdivisions = Maribeau Ranch , Fairacres RePlat M 1, Fairacres kePlat 11 3 . Pines West, and Pines West ist Edition 9 would like to exPress concerns reqardinq the develoPment af this area bY its develoPer Mr. Ra1Ph Guthrie. It is our feelin9 that a9reements and decisians 4uverninq this dEVel oPment have not been hc+nored. The follawin9 issues are the basis af aur caricern and wE would aPPreciate some resPOnse as to the current status of the , Prahlems. ~ In the mattFr aF Zone Classificationv uPSradins PE- 1140-77 ~ Pines West 2e-160-77. Has the devtloPEr comPl ied with the commissianers decisior, bY order• of the board ( dated June 22, 15+78 ) in : . A= FrovidinA the re9uired fence alang the north Plat aoundarY ? B= Flacing a statement in the Plat dedication that unusuallY hi9h naise levels maY exi4t i n t he area ? G: Makinq anY effort tu miti4ate the naise Problem bY sPECial constructian mEthads and laridscaPinA ^f Has an sitt sEwage disPOsal been aPProved for lots 10911,12 Block two Fines west in aPPOSitian to staff findin9s ? Has the sPOnsor Provided the Paved and fenced wal kwaY connFCtion ta TrFnt ElemrntarY Schoal PFr staff findines Do structures at 11921 E Fcailroad, Pines west ist Addition mrEt miriirrtum cauntY sett,ack requir•ements ? 1 WhY has the countY authorizEd relocated houses to be Placed in Pines west lst Addition when the Published covenants RPecificallY re9uire sPecial construction mentads includins 2x6 walls ? This construction is not tYPical of the structures beinq relocated. We wauld like to addr•ess the HuildinA and SaftY division sPecificallY ta ask that the followine issues be considered. A qarage relocated into the area is definitilY not structurallY sound. We 9uestion the "soundness and safetY " rf the ather relocated housEs and are re9uestinA a structural analYSys or insPECtion to meet current codes for each of the three relocated houses. Also, wer-e these homes insPected Prior to rElocation as required bY law ? WEre Permits filed allawinQ these hames to be relocated Prior to the rr►ove ? Lot 11 of block 2 has a house on it but conditions restrict on-4ite sewaqe disPOSaI. What can be dane in this situation ? Neishbors ad.iacent to the relocated homes are camPlainins of problertis with mice. Cauld an insPectian determine if these relocated houses are free of PeQt infestation ? We would like ta address the Flanning and Zonin9 dePartment resarding the enforcement of zonin9 laws sPecificallY set back requirements. The earase ad.iacent to the 4reen house at 11205 E Frederick does not meet the minimum requirements. ' We have been Promised various methods to helP mufFlr thE noise Problem due to the close ProximitY of the railroad tracks. In 1978 a naise t,uffer and fecrce was a9reed to as Part of the devEloPment. To this date no construc',1on method , landscaPinq or fencin9 has been imPlemented to rriitisate thE noise Problem. Also v is there a time frame for the noise buffer and / ar fence that was uri9ina11Y PraPOSed in 1978 Our neighborhood orsanization would aPPreciate notification of ProPOSed chan9es ar rF9uests for change of conditions sPecific to our nei9hborhood. Thank You for Your time in deal inq with aur citizens concerns in the develoPment of our nei9hborhaod. Your future assistance in SGlVln9 thesE Prablems will t,e aPPreciated. sl f1CerelY = MHA cct CountY Commissioners ~ Wa11Y Hubtrard . Tom tJavis , Retd UkeY . 2 r' U ~ ~ , PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ BROAUWAY CENTFE BUILOING N 721 1EFFE1i50N STREET PNONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 SPOnANC COUhI♦ COU"T hOULC December 26, 1985 Ms. Karen Youuig E 11412 Frederick Avenue Spokane, WA 99 206 Dear Ms. Young : As I procnised a oouQle of wedc.g ago, I am writing to you bo review your rie.ighborfivod oonoerns regarding the developnent of Pines West and Pines West lst Addition. FENCE FoQ : Earlier this year (July 1985) I was asked by the developer if the fenoe requirement included fencing al,ong the right of- way of Rai].z+oad Avenue. My initial view was that no fenGing along the right-of-way was required. This was based on the wordiM of the oorxiition ' calling far the separation of residenti.al and railraod uses. Laber I reviewed the Boan3 of OocRnissioners decision iri nrare detail and have reached the oanclusi.on the fencing requirement applies to the l,ength of the pre- liminary plat. I have so notifisd the develaper and established July of 1986 as the time by which the fercirig shauLd be installsd. SII~.'~VIKS AT F.A.ST ErID QF PIlNES WFS'T 1ST ADDITICN: I hav+e d.isctLSSed this matter with the Spdcam Coqmty who say they have a bond oovering : . the ins tallation vos ts , however, they need reques t f rom a pYoper ty aaner explaining that a problem exi.sts to initiate acti,on on the bond. If you wish to initiate sudi a request y+ou shauld notify Gary Nelson of the Spokane Ovunty Enqineer'8 Offioe, N 811 Jeffersvn, Spakane, WA. 99260. FU~4C'ATID RESIMKES WITFiM TI-E PIINES WEST DEVIIAPN=: I have reoeived a letter fram the Buiiding and Safety Department indicating that for the most part the rel,ocated s trvctures have proper bui lding permi ts . There is a problem at E. 11205 Frederick with regards to the garage. We are oontactiryg the develraper about it and in all likelitwod it will be moved fram the lot. I reooqizize that you end other residents are voncerned abaut the establishment of relocated residenoes within this develcpment but fran my research there has beesz no violation of zoning or subdivision regulations in the plaoement ar use i of these s tructures. I f you have speci fic ooncerns regarding the t,ime f rames ' and type of improvenents whf ch must be made on these res idences , I reoamwxd you call Tocn Davis of the Building and Safety Departrnent, 456-3675 or write bo him at N. 811 Jef f eravn, Spokane,WA. 99260. ,l j i Ms. Karen Young Page 2 I have enclosed letters f ran the various d ts for your review and reoorcLs. If you have any f urther ques tions , pleas e give me a call. S' cerely, ~ z: ~A " ft--.j DaUGIA,.S S. A►DAMS Subdivisian Adninistrator DSA : dj Enc].osures . S / DE ~1 Al- t<,~ , OFFICE OF C4UNTY E NGIN E ER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date December 3 19 85 Inter-office Communication To Doug Adams, Planning Department From ~Gary S. Nelson, Planning Engineer Su6ject Pj nes Weat end Pinea West_lst Addition We are holding bonds for both these projects to inaure the improvementa speci- fied in the Engineer's conditions of approval. In order to call these bonds, we need a written request from the property owners specifying what the problem ia and asking ue to take the bond to resolve this problem. GSN/set Form 327-C R " • • • ' . r , • 1 f . i ~ It i' I / I . , ~•,'~J/ , , 1,' I \ 1 1 PLANNING OEPARTMENT BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 1EFFERSaN STREET ' PHONE 456-2205 .r ' ~ • SPOKANE, WASNINGTOH 99260 ' , . . , SPONANC COUnI♦ COU~'f NOUtC Deceber 26, 1985 Ms. Karen Young E 11412 Frederidc Avenue Spokane, WA 99206 Dear Nis . Yotm,g: ' As I pznmised a vouple of weeks ago, I am writing tA you bo review your neighborhood oonverns regarding the develcFment of Pines Wes t and Pines Wes t ls t Addi tion. FErICE FtEQ : Earlier this year (J1ily 1985) I was asked by the developer if the fenoe requirement included fenc,ing al,ong the right-of- way of Ra.ilroad Avemue. My initial view was that no fencing alronq the right-of-way was required. Thi.s was based on the wordinq of the oonciition calling for the separatirn of residential and railraod uses. Later I reviewed the Baard of Connissi.oners decisian in more detail and have reached the vonclusion the fencing requirenent appLies to the l,ength of the pre- " liminazY Plat. I have so notifisd the devel,oper anr3 established July of 1986 as the time by which the fencing shauld be installred. SIMIkIKS AT FAS'T IINID QF PIlIE.S WEST 1ST ADDITI0N: I have di.scttssed this matter with the Spdcane Cotuzty who say they have a bond oav+ering , the installation oosts, however, they need reqtlest from a pYcperty ccat*r e-Npla.inirxJ that a problem exists tn initiate actirai on the baxl. If you wish to initfate such a request you shaild notify Gary Nelson of the Spolcane aounty Engineer's Offioe, N 811 Jeffersal, Spokane, W4. 99260. IMIDCATID FESIDENCE'S WITHIlJ THE PIlNES WEST DEVELiOPMEITr: I hawe reoeived a letter from the Butt'Z~`ing and Safety Department that for the mast part the relACated s trwtures have proper building pernu ts . There is a problem at E. 11205 Frederick with regarcis to the garage. We are vontacting the develAper about it and in all l.ik,elihood it will be moved frcxn the lot. I reoogriize that you and other residents are oonoemed about the establishnent of reloca►ted reside.noes within this develoQcnent but fran my research there has been n4 violatfon of zoninq or sufidivisfon regulations in the plaoenent ar use of these s tructures . I f you have speci fic vonoeYns regarding the time f rames and type of inprwenents which must be made on thege residenoes, I reoocirn.nd you call Tan Davis of the Builyding and Safety Department, 456-3675 or write to him at N. 811 Jeffersari, Spolcane, WA. 99260. . j { Ms. Karen Young Page 2 I have enclosed letters from the variow d ts for your review and records. If you have any further questions, please giv+e me a call. r S ' cerely, dA4" ~ %-.j DOUGIAS S. ASAMS Subdivisian Achninistratar ASA : dj Enclrosures A R E C E I V E N 0 V 2 01978 - ~ y 6t First American Title Compan ~TMENT ~ ,11.a1,`` OFFIC'F; F.SCROt1' OFFICF; li est 704 Frrst Auenue Order No. 2 2 8 7 9 North 8611 Dtulscarz • Stccte B I)pol,anr, ll'as{ir»gton 99204 ccs • Spokane Co. Planning Spokune, LVaSj21I2gIOl2 99208 PIro»1r (509) 456-0550 Spokane County Engineers Phane. (509) 484-1600 PLAT CERTIFICATE To: Arger, Yake & Wright Pines West lst Add. 207 Great Western Bldg. SpokanE, WA Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of November 13, 1978 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 25, North, Range 44, E.W.M., in Spokane.County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the South quarter corner of said Section 4, said point being on the centerline of Bowdish Road; thence North 890 48154" East 30 feet to the East line of Bowdish Road; thence North along the East line of Bowdish Road 23.32 feet to the Ueginning of a curve to the left with a radius of 219.60 feet • and a central angle of 16°48'26"; thence Northwesterly along said curve a distance of 64.42 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right with a radius of 20.27 feet and a central angle of 900 ; thence Northeasterlg along said curve a distance of 31.84 ieet; thence North 16 48'26" West 510.00 feet to a polnt on the Southerly right of way line of the Burlington Northern Railroad right of way (formerly Great Northern); thence North 730 11134" East along said Southerly riCht of way line 1,892.26 feet; thence South 00 07100" West 701.38 feet to a point on the North line of Mirabeau Ranch Addition according to plat recorded in Volume 4 of plats, Page 16, in Spokane County, Washington; thence South 890 49'04" west along said North line of MirabEau Ranch Addition 1799.71 feet to the Point of Beginning. This company certifies that record title is vested in RALPH GUTHRIE AND GERTRUDE GUTHRIE, as husband and wife, free from all liens, encumbrances and obDections, except as follows: NOTES: 1. General Taxes for 1978 in the amount of $74.94 are paid in full. Tax account No.: 04544-9021 * CONTIyUED * Afflf+ated h7th Ferst Amerrcan Title Insurance CompQny y i • . . Page 2 No. 22879 This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. FIRST AMERICAN TITLF~,INSURANCE COMPANY / ~~-''L s , / / L ~ f ' , -r,-~ ;1•~' L,;, Title Of f icEr Larry D. Dunston ~ R E C E I V E N 0 V 2 01978 LD/sb SPOKANE COUNTY PLAfVNING DEPARTMENT N0. SEFORF. '1'NE P.rAPT~ 0i, (11i1C1! -WVjY.AI`IE COU147I , Ap_ :LIi.I3~ ~12J . ZE-160- 77 ) ~ IN THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE ZOIVING ~ MAP FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTI'AL ON PROPERTY) R E S 0 L U T I o rt LOCATED IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 25 N., ~ RANGE 44, E.W. M., SPOKANE COUNTY, ~ WAS'HINGTON. ~ ) ) The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Couu,ii sstioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it a_ppeari_rLg to the Roard that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given duE notice of tr►e hearing on the matter in the mannEr and for the time provlded by lavr, that said Planning Cornmission has hcld a public hearing as required; and that the said Planning Comm, sr,i on conruriB a.n the Plan to zone the fo11ow1ng dESCrlbed property as: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: ' All that area platted as lots 4, S, 8, 9, 10, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, and 28, Block 1; lots 10, 11, 12, and 13, Block 2; and all of Block 3 of Pines West First Additlon located in Sectlon 4, Township 25 N., Range 44, E eW . M., Spokane County, Washtngton. TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: All that area platted as lots 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 120, 13, 14, 15, Block 1; and Lots 1- 9, Block 2, of Pines West First Addition located in Section 4, Townshfp 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above-descrtbed property be, and the same is hereby zoned under the classffication of SINGLE FAMILY AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL as deffned in the zoning ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amended. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS e?W DAY OF 91/ - ATTEST: BOARD OF COUIdTY COMMISSIONERS VERPJO o OHLAPiD 0F SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTOIV C1 f thc: 5wqk By : RAY W. CHRISTENSEN, CHM. Deputy 1ERRY C. KOPET naiir ''his is to cert~fy that this is a iipmw ' ~tl true and correct~c~yoof Resolutlon No. ~ passed y c Boar this azy t , Ry: - Deputy I hQreby c-rtify that I huve pos e e abovc changes and revisioils on the Zoning Map in thc Building Cades DcpartmEnt, and do furthcr ck.rtify that th,-, zone classlfication changF• is thc sainc as describcd abovo and shown on thN: attachcd map. SIGTIED: DATED : . , • wwP 3115 REV, 8-7 3 1 ?M1 . . _ , • _ . . . ~,.Y ~ w~ • . . . . , , . ' ' ~ ~ . . . . . ~ THE WAS~IINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY . ; . ~ . . . . Etec-tric and Natur-at Gas Setvice . P.O. BOK 31276 SPOKAN,E, WASHINGTON 99220~(509) 489•0500 . ~,.r+rmrr!n - _ . - ~ . ' . • , • - ' . . • ~ January 51, 1979, . ; . . . . a . . . , . . Guthrie Investmsnte 12721 Eaet Sprague, Avenue . ~ ~ ~ . . ~ „ • . ~ - ~ . Spokane, Weshington. 99216 ` Re: Pines West let Additioa . p : I 0 Geatletaen: ~ . , ° - , ~ ~ . . . . . _ . ~ Ia compliance with your recent requeet, our engineQre bsve narked ia - ~ sced,on eubject~ preliminary plat areas whero utilitq etrips are deeired 1n the . subsequ+ent dedication. We 'ere returaiiig the _masked print aE this time. Your: cooperation in thie matter ie eppreciated. ne7ry tru2.q yours,. . . . . . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ Richard Muffett - - - Rights of Way Supervisor . . ~ RMsmh. Enclosure . . ~ ~ . . ~ ' . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . CC: SPokane Couuty Plannin 'g. Comiioeiou~ , , . . . _ . . . C . . . . . . ~ ~ , - . . ~ . . , , . . - J,44j0 8 , ~ : . . 5;9 ~ ~PQlAN . . . . . . . . . G41~N~~G F CO,~~.Y . ~ . - ; . . . ~ Dl'pART~E . . . . . N~ . . . , ~ . . , ~ . ~ . , . . . 5 E R lV 1 N G . T H E 1,N l. A N D _ E M, P I R•E 0 f W A 5 H I N G 1 0 N, ' A N.D 1 D A H• 0 / OOzIMANTS ` . 'V PMES 11D, ST 1 st '•MIT7DIT ~ MJD' T _UL I•~~'~ BY T -11-301 ? __,.""MTTu ~ t _'X.lph D. and C-e:: t-rude 0. G.t ~ii~-le Ibo in TM oj:-nzrs J of all lots ir_ 'i.nAm. ~•:es Fi; s ~ .':d~ on , :aunty ai 'o'-nokane, Stctp of 33 DeZ' 1?1dp -'UiIG2'80ri 3'3CO_"ded i'1 t-_ht: OifiC° Jf il-?e voLtY2t~? -:1,Ud? tOT Oi 521d Cdltty cm do aaa_eby dec? are tiis follo::?ng p_•ot-ac iira covenant-s c31d CO11di;1021s fOi' us1@ LisL a1d 17CT1Li 1 u Oi al1. ~0f Said UZ°OpL3^~'t,jT t.h1C11 i,118zJ O.ZI and ior t:le uso and benefit oi eacn and e1o-ry piu°chasar ox'' any of said pY°operty: (a) L-41D USII; VID BtT.iLDDIv T7PL. No lo 'u sha11 ve used e_xcep t for residon tial. Dur- poses. I3o builclirig sha.Lt Ue erocLad, altered, placecl, or pLrmitted on any lo-'u otliar than nr! e ciatacho d single-f araily d:-rellarlg rr;ay ~e placed on zo ts 5, 8,, 9.110.9 11, and 16 tha ough- 27 inclusive B? ocl; 1; Lots 10.,11,12, Bloclt 2; a11 0f Bloclt 3. Blither ane dei;ached singryle-i ami? y ch;e)l; ng or one dv tac;acd ti:o-i amily ciwiellin- may be placed on Lo t-s i, 2, 3, 6, 7 ,12,1304,,1', Bl.oclc 1 2nd lots 1throu Y`-,. 9 inclu9ivs Bloctt 2. No sinZl-fami?y d-uellin.~ shC1l havs a sall?ng ~~.ce of lss~ than ,A? 3_50; 0OC. QQ and no t-o-i a_m1.ly ch:Qi l; ng a sell~nf; pri C8 of le ss t.h~n 6' 75, OOJ. QOs both includinv the ~ o~~ at curront Re al Estate values. (b) I,ITBIvTOCK AITD FOITLT.-Ll"v. No animals, livesLOCk, or poul.trTJ af an-y kind sha1.1 be raised, bred or ka~pt on any lo -Lu, e;zcept do ;s, ,cats or o thar housQho? d pets may be koDi; provilided tha. t tl-iey are not kept, breci, or maintained for any cormerc? al pur,pose. ( c) SIGfB. I+1o sign o.-Lo any kind sliall be clisplayed to the public viei•r on any lot • e_xcept one profvss_cnal sign of not more thzn one sc,uare foo u, vne si,-- p of not npre than fi-ve sc;uata feslu ad-ve= Li-sing the -oropert- for sale or rent, or signs uved Dy a bui-lder t'oo advErtise the wopsrty dur? n; t'le c aris truc vian 2nd sal.e sveriod. (d) NUISAIMES. ?4Io no.Llous ar oa'fensive activity sha.lll be carrz ed on upon any lot, no-_ s~~aU aaly-l-,T-.!ng ioe aone tIZereon T:-hich may be, or may bocomQ an annayance ar nuisanee 40 the 'tic? gLbo?^F?ood. _ (e) T.~,:FO~~?~Y ST?OCTU12i. N0 3tiructuura of a tenporzr-,yT character, trailez^, basE- mcnu, uent, ssaclt, ga_^age, ba-rn or o t'~cr out-builcLin; shall be usea on a.ny loU Gt any time as a residencs ai -tther t;mporarily or pol inanentily. (f) s M, RIG .1..aCr:TIOI1. I►Io builcting sha1.? 'oe 1ocated on any lot nQa1.Mer to the fron~ ?ot 1~e , Qi~e lo~ l+ne, or n~~~~ to t~lo flanking stireet 3ine than the nin- irnim build-in~ tie~ ba.ck l-ne, as }~~'o~ri dec~ f ol in ~5ection 0l~A.0►~'0, ~olta,,e Coun ty Zoni.ng 0 rclincance . (g) E'`E.IaMTS. ►az?neni:s 'Lor construction a.nu mainten~.*~ce af telephons and ` zlec ju-ri c clist~! buzion pole 3.inQS are reservad for and over the ~^oar five (5) feE -Lu of al1 lo t-s . (h) Sz'EOIA-L (ANSTRUC'.i'I(}P'T MI~'MS. A-11 ouil-clers iv.ri11 emqploy apnroariate naterials and nethods of con~ 'uruction ci-s foL1o~-:s : iTor-th faca.ng e_xterior t1~.1:Ef be con- s-truc 'ued using 211--1_ 61r st-udss rat-her I'U-san 2"s: 4 "stuc€s and snp-11 cons; st of sotMd Xdeadpninfv board on tthe idor;,:1 racina e_cte?^ior r•r! th a1in;. r , of 319" of i.nsul.ation i;itii an Et-11 va.,lue or bei,t'ier, and interior t•:all coverin~. ( i) TEK:. T-4e se coven zmts a.rQ to run i-: i411 the la.nd and shall po oindi.ng an cl-11 p2?^t7.2S 211d Pll ae3"SOT1S ta LL`!d@y' Lhefi ?'t" cz ~"J@13.OC~ O_T~' ~"s;E~Tl~;~j..~`^•Jo (2)) J'~'eaz'S rram the d<.te thesa co,enarzte zFe reco-r3ad, afte= sedd covenan; s s~.P1.1 'ao au JL-AomaLic ally e_~Lended = or success? ve veriods of ten (10 )y3dz•s unlass a,n inns tyzw:i3nt signed ay amajori~,-y of the than aT:ners of tila ! o.s :iaa "Oeen recorc?e- d aQ eein~ ~;o chan;o sa?d covenente_ in wholA or in part. ~PapO 2 . ~ (j) CI-i~~SIGES. Developer ~ains the sole ri~;ht to a]..ter ~ se covenants at any time prior 'uo the sale of tr!z last buildin,~, ii-ithin said proneItJ. (k ) 22~~T~'0?MUNT. If the part? es he?"@ i,0 or any of thery or t'iieir heirs, e_tecutors or assiLmees, shal-i v'-olate or attienut to violcalue anf of the covenant-s or resti^ictions hei•ein j-r:aile theJ a,re in efiect, it silal.l 'ue la7t;ful for z.ny oLi-Br person or persons oi:nin-; any o ~il-er lots in sai-d subdivision to prosecute zny proceedinvs at la.i* or in ecluity aga3.nst the Derson or persons viola 'uion or atter,Zptry n- -lu-o violate any sucil cosrenant or L-es triction and either to prevent him or lu-hem from doing so or to recover da..ma;es or o'uher dues fox, such violati-on. (1) IPSVh.LIDATION. of any one of t1Ze5e covenants 'ay judgnent oi" court order shall in no way affect any o'L the oJu-izer provisions which sna1l remain in full iorce and effect. IIJ ;:ZMIESS ~F, the aforesaid indijr_clua1. 'r_ave caused ' ir naraes to be hereunto su'~scribecl and a.ffi:Led tllis ~ ~ day o ~ ~ . Ralph D. Gui;hrie . Gertrudo 0. Gut;irie STATE OF TTASIII21GMI'I ) COLl21tJ Oi SP01W3L. )SS. On this ~d~~Y of bef ore e the / ~ ~ ~L,r • ~ , t undorsigZed, a IJo tasy t ubl~.c in ^ ~or ='le e o~ ~'a;-ngt c~u1.v cor~miss- oned 2sid sc,Torn, ge rsona.lly a~ne are ~,/~',r to me kno:m to be the individunl.s v'ho e:.eeuted ~'i"oregoing instrur:ent, anc1 aeknow1edged the said instiur~zent to be ~'iie free and volun ~G.ry acti and deed of said indivi.duals, ior 'Uhe uses and pi; rposed tnerein nen t-ioned. :•.'ITPIESS rr- lland and official seal hereto affijved the day and year first above trritten. "V4 • IJotaiy Fublic nand f or tjze Sta 'u-e of ' Washington, ~ sicling a'u Mead,,.Wn. - , ~ ~ , r OQNM- IfIN`l'S PDtES :.T~ST :~LIDITIOrJ 100 i 1ALL I-E BY T~-CSL P?~ESaiTS that I~a1.ph D. and Ge rtrt~de 0. Gu ~hriQ bo ing o►nez•s of all lots in Pines ::est l:dc3ition, County of Spol,ane, State of TTas~n~;ton, as per r~lap 'Uhereon recorded in the ofiice of the CountY Audi tor of said County on do hereby daclare the folloTrinap pro 'uective covenants and conditions for i,he use and benez"i '-u of a11 of said property ►,hich they oim and for the use and beneiit o'L each and evenj puz•chaser of any of said property: (a) L.UJD US:,] MdD BLTIT DIIT IJG No lot shall be used except f or resiaential purposes. I;To bu_;..ldin~ slia.ll oe orec ted, alznred, placed or permitted to reraain on an,y lot other ~-I'La.n one detanc}ied single-l-amily di:elling raaf be pl-aced on any lot. rdo iior,le sha11 have a selling price of less luhan $ 35, 000.00, inclucLng the lot alu current t ea1 ES'Late prices. (b) LIjI'z"STOCI~ IOD POiTLTM rTo Gninals, livestock, or poul'ury oL ariy kind siiall be raised, b~~ed or kept on any lot, e._cept dogs, cats or o~her household -oets rrlay be kept -orovided tr_zt they are not lcept, brect, or maintained 'Lor any comnercial pu..rpose. ' (c) SICIdS. No s? g-i or any ki.nd s'aal1 be displrayed to the pu'blic v-i.e-T on any lot evicep ~ one nrofession~. si ;n of not more than one square-.i oot, one sim of not more than five scua-rE feet advervising the propQrty for salo or rent, or sins used by a bttilder to adjrer~ise the -property dusing the consluruction and sales period. , (d) rNISJUICrS. t1o noxious or offensi-ve acti;ri.tf shall be carried on upon any lot, nor shzL1 anything be done 'Unereon T:hich may be, or may becorme an annoyance or nuis2,nce to ti'ie neighborhood. ' (e ) TMIlPORI~Rff STIUCTtT R-ETS. No structure of a f'i°?1ljJOrary character, trai-1er, base- r~ent, ten S~laC~c, ~ar~.~e, barn or o ~iier out-building shall be used on any lot at aU time as a residence either tenporarily or aernanently. (f ) BUII,DIl`TG WC ATIOId. No building shall be located on any lot nearer to the front lot 17ne, szde lot line, or nea.re-r to t?l-e :lankin~ street line t~►an t:~e r~in- imum ouildinU Se u- baCk line, as projri.ded ior 3.n SQCtion 4. 0hA.090, Spokane County Zonino 0 rcii.nance . ` EAS'isOTTS. LasemEnts for cons tiyuction and maintenance of telephone 2nd electri-c cLstri'oution pole lines are reserved for and over t'he raar five (5) feet of all lo 'us . (h) SPECIILL OONSiIPECTIOIT 12TIDDS. A11 builclers -ri11 employ appropriate materia'..s and methods of cons truc tion as folloT,-s: Ilorth facin-- e:.terior srells :-i11 ne con- structed usinz 2t'x'o"" s uuds rat:ier 'uha,n 2":: 4 rt sicuds md sl-iall consist of sound deadeninJ board on tizA North facing, e.-,terior :)-ith a minir,nn of 315' of insulation t-,it}i an IR-11 va.lue or bet 'u-er, cnd interior ,Ta11 covering. ( i) TE~ii. These covenal ~s arc to run ;~th t.ze lznd Gnd sha.ll ee bindin~ on a1.l ~ ~ ' ~ -oe_ parties ~ ^nd ~,11 pe_rsonc cla' , a1'S ~ Y •~in~ unciE~ t~-~en f or G riod of t• .ien~ ~y-z~ ve (~25) ;~re fY'OI?l the date ti1eSe CO -,Te212ntS S.x'8 r'eC03'dBd, a.i -Lu81" ?l:"11Ch ti _rie Sd? CZ coTrensn ts 5h2]..1. '09 zuto:~a ~ica11.y el:tended for success; ve aeriods of ~en (10) Jears unless an ins trunQn t signecl by a najori vy o~.~' tu,ae 'Uhen oT:ners of 'uhe lo ts has been recorded a-a~eeing 4'fo change said co -..rcnen L-s in ~:hhole or i-n vart. r , •p agO 2 '*k (j) CI-L*IG:-,;S. De-ireloper 'un=!ns the sole ribht to alter .:se covenants at any ' time prior to the sale of tile last building;rithin said propertJ. (k) M1I'0?Cia-21-ITT. If the gG.rties he?~eto or a.ny of theri, or tneir heirs, e..ecutors or assigiees, shall v-►_o? ate or atter>>pt to violate anf of the covenants or rostrictions herEin wsiilE they are 5.n efiec t, it shall be lz~r'ul for any ot;-nr person or persons oz;ninz; ary othcr lots in said subdivision to orosecute any proceedin,:.-s at lacr or in equity agai.nst t}ie person or persons viola tion or atfierapt? ng to violate any sucll covenant or restriction and e-ither to prevent h?rt or t-hem fron doing so or to recover damages or other dues for such violati-on. (1) Il`1VhI,IDATION. of any one of L:Zese covenants by- jud.-gr,~ent of court order shall in no iray affect an;l of the other provisions :rhich sha11. renain in full force and effect. IId :-TIZ'ItESS ~F, t'Lie aforesaid indiTr~ dualq, have caused ' ir names to be hereunto subscribed and a.ffi;ced this day o )04A:eeg~ ~ • C_ _ G°~-C .t''~~.i~ r~ ' . R.alph D. GuLhzi_e , Gertrude 0. Guthrie STATE OF T IASIUItTCZC7I'1) Counzf of S`1:'OKAJL. )ss. On this d.y of before me, the undersigned, a IVotary Pub1i-c in /.Lr e e of '~a, ~~nnt dul~r eorimissioned 2.nd si,*orn, personally apneare ,y,to me knozm to be the individuals triio e iecuted tl-r6 ioregoina insti'ut~ent, and acknoTf=ledged the said instrument to 'oe the iree and volun 'uG.ry act and deed of said individual.s, for 'Uhe uses and puxposed thprcin mentioned. WITNr.,SS my hand and official seal hereto affilved the day 2,nd year first above -written. . , ~ ~ . ! lJotary Public nand for tiie Sta ~c- of ' T-lashington, idineg at Mead,..Wn. ~ . r- JNE CHANGES POSTED ON ZO. G MAPS ' Application No. ZE 160-77 Res, No. 79-04(( Res. Date_ff• 2(0-7'~ From : A (t To : IZ ' i / Twi? ~t. lz.° s. Posted By: CD- Date Posted:_ 5 " ~ ~ 7q Acres: Sec, 4 Two. Z~ Range 44 EAST AIA (`IVall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' (Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' ox", OVA* all Map) 1~i~~1e Office Scale: 1" 1000' (W oe. (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' /o •OK (File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' AA (File Map) Metro A11 (Director's Offfce) Scale: 1" - 2 000' /14 (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile IVA (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles . (Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' _(Wall Map) Front Jffic? Scaie: 1- 1000' (V~ jll Map) Middle Jffice Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 400' _ (Fi1P Map) Tracina 434 (Sot':h East Zoning Maps) Scale: - 1000" ~_(File Map) Metrc 411 (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' (F:te Map) Countv-Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile _ (File Map) Count\ (?Vlap Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Cards) Middle Office . ~ 7s 614- ; ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COI41IISSIONEtS OF SPOKANE COUN'TY, WASHIlJa'I`ON. FIlVDINGS AND ORDER REGAR.DINa PREZIMINARY PLAT P'ROPOSAL AND ZCtJE RECLASSIFICATIQN, PE-1140-77, PINES WEST; ZE-160-77 , AMICULTUftAL TO SINGLE FANLILY RESID~NTIAL AND/OR TWO FAMILY RESIIlENT7AL. , WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Coamiaeion did, after public hearing ; on NOVII4BEft 16, 1977, at which a quorum vote did not occur, forward to tbe Board ~ i of County Cor,missionera e requeat that the Board set e epecial hearing date , (File PJurnber PE-11 40-7? ) tYie preliminary plat to be lnown as PINES iJEST; $nd, WHEREAS, the Ralph (#uthrie Company did by letter dated NOVEHUM 34, 1977, request a special hearing before the Board of County Coranissioners to preeent evidence and testimony in lieu of no reconmendation from the Planning Commiseion with regard to the above described preliminary plat and zone reclassiPication; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commisaioner did hold a public hearing on DECENBM 29, 1977, to consider the preliminary plat krnown ae PINES WEST, the re- quest of the plat sponsor and comnenta of the objectors and other interested parties ; aild. " 1OIEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those Pavoring and thoae opposing the above described preliminary plat propoeal and zone 'reclassiPication, t,he Board of County Coamiesionera of 9pokane County, having fully coneidered the testimony given, the recorde and minutee of the Planning Comnieeiong the etaff findings of NOVE?MER 16, 1977, the environmental aheckliet, and all other evidence presented, and flirther having personally aequainted themeelvea with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the conditions contained in the etaff findings were generally valid and eufficient; and, WHEREAS, the Chairman of the Board did issue on JANUARY 319 1978 a pro- posed ne6ative threshold determination, which was duly circulated with the environ- mental checklist and etaff review to other agenciee of juriediction; andt 1Q3ERI;AS, Grant L. Ki.mer, did by letter dated FEBRUARY 13, 1978, challenge the i9suance of a proposed deolaration of non-eignificance, pointi.ng out numerous alleged potential probleme aseociated with exieting railroad related noisea, as well as possible mitigating measures; and, 4M2T,,AS, the Board and various County staff inembers did confer with regard to Ar. Kinner's letter, noted the iseues raiaed, reFoPeidexed the proposed deciaratiori of non-significanee; and, WHEREAS, the Chairman did iseue a final negative threshold detezmination on FEBRuAxy i7, 1978; ~K ~ .~.Si ~ ~ ~ NOW, THFJWORE, the Board of County Commiseionere doee conclude that the progosed preliminary plat to be lnown as PaTES WEST and zone reclassification ~ : to Single Family Residential and Tao Fam.ily Reaidential should be an.d hereby ie ~ approved subject to the Planning Staff findinge of NaVIIMBER 161 19779 EXCEPT tbat ` t,he following additional conditione shall also be imposed; ' 1} That duplexes within the plat be limited to the area eaet r of Bowdieh Road. , , Tnat t,he aponsor provide for a 6 foot aecurity Pence along ' the north plat boundary eo as to provide a clearly divided separation from the railroad tracka. 7 ~ 3Th.at a etatement be placed in the plat dedication that unueually ~ high noise levele may exist in the area during certain perioda ~ I of the day. ~ ~ ~ 4) That t.he plat sponsor make every effort through special con- ~ 9 struction methods and landscaping to mitigate any poesible ~ ~ ~ ~ noiae problem that might exist. The plat eponeor is directed ' ~ ! to work with the(Building Codee Department and the Planning) ~ i Staff to develop these methods. ~ I , ~ LIATED T4ils -DAY oF 1978. ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMIISSICJF,.RS OF SPOKANE COUN'I'Y9 WA.SHING'I'ON 0;000P . ATTEST : • ON . OHLAND 4ra~er of Board BY: ► , _ ` BEFORE THE BOARD 0F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION & ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING ) PE-1140-77, PINES WEST - ZE-160-77, AGRICUL- ) COMMISSIONERS' DECISION TURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ANDIOR ) TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Hodges, Inc. ) This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, to render its decision concerning the request of Hodges, Inc., East 12715 Mission Avenue, Spokane, lJashington 99206 for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading; and The Board having received no recommendation from the Spokane County Planning Commission because of the lack of a quorum vote on said application, as set forth in the Commission's minutes of November 16, 1977; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on December 29, 1977, at the request of Ralph Guthrie Company, East 12721 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, Washington, and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon ~ the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available ~ to the Board and consideration of the environmental review, to approve this preliminary plat application subject to the conditions as contained , in the Planning Staff Findings, EXCEPT that the following additional conditions shall also be imposed: 1) That duplexes within the plat be limited to the area east of Bowdish Road. ~ 2) That the sponsor provide for a 6 foot security fence along ~ the north plat boundary so as to provide as clearly divided separation from the railroad tracks. 3) That a statement be placed in the plat dedication that unusually high noise levels may exist in the area during cerain periods of the day. 4) That the plat sponsor make every effort through special con- struction methods' and landscaping to mitigate any possible noise problem that might exist. The plat sponsor is directed to work with the Building Codes Department and the Planning Staff to develop these methods. The Board authorized the Chairman to sign a final declaration of non- significance. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter. BY ORDER OF TNE BOARD this 2 day of March, 1978. VERNON W.ONLA Cl rk o th oard , by: `F~o nne Montague, Deputy C erk ~ C3 1--♦ 78 1615 NOo BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTONa ) PEw~ 14OA-y 7 I ~ IN TNE MATTER OF FILING THE FINAL RLAT ) R E S 0 L U T1 0 N OF PINES WEST IST ADDITI~N LOCAYED IN ~ SFCTION 49 TOWfltSHIP 25N9 RAdGE 44 E.W,M.) sPOKaNE cauNTY, WAsHtNGroN ~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTYj WASHINGTON, that the final plat of PINES WESfi 1 ST ADDITION Portiota of the SE 1/4 of Sect3on 4, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W,M., 5pokane County, Washingtvn. more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way ded.cated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a sep- arate resolution of the Board of County Commissionerso PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS If DAY OF 9 7'f BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, Ir1ASHINGTOTV o HARRY M. UARNED, CHM. ~-~-CHRISTENK-N JERRY C. KOPET ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND C1 of the Board ~ By: F'1NAL PLAT C;li1:(:K LlST !e&A.4 dK. 1 . t'iiial 1'lat Luroyc:d dp k 2. SuUdivision iiaitiu 3. 5Cc,tton, townshiN & railyu 4. 5ponsor(s) iiame (s) 5. Eiigineer or surveyor 6. Sheet size 24" X:i6" 7. North point, scale (100' - 1" or 2 00' - 1") % 8. Boundary Line O~ 9. Location & width s of proposed streets, alleys, rights of way, easements, parks, open spaces,& proper labeling of spaces to be dedicated to the public 10. Layout & names of ad)oining subdivisions O~ a. Replats - Layout & Name of the replat shall be shown by dashed lines ~ 11. Street names - consistent wlth existing streets ln city arid county. - Check aqainst names on round name wheel. 12. Lot sizes - i.e., 80' X 125' with 10, 000 sq. ft. for single tamily lot Cul De Sacs - 80' at buildiny line l.s . Layout, numbers, and dimensions of lots & parcel s 4t 14. Necessary engineeriny data ~ 1 S. Does dedication state if iricilviciual water and/or public sewers will be provided in accordance v++ith preliminary plat of approval. 16. lVotarized certificatloii by a professional land surveyor. 17. Private re strictions , if ariy 18. Number and type of units , ak 19. Dedication of streets to the public ok i~ 20. Easement verification & illustration a PNi►~✓~' 4~. 21 Check easemt~r►ts, clouds on property, etc. f rom Tttle Re port dk pt- dEE& wa~SA. o~AV . DIL ~ 2 ~k P~ EX ~ i r,► ~ rS 44*ve7-s FoA EAMAd ~04.47- LOT AREA STAYIS G5 FU'R: PINES HEST FIRST ~ FILE: 11401 BLOCK t AREA = 351415. SQ FT ~ 8,.07 ACRES1 ACCUM AREA = 351475* SQ FT t 9.07 ALRE51 DIFFERENCE ~ 0. SQ FT f ~LOCK iL AIlEA 154423. SQ FT 3# 55 A~ ~ ) AGCUM llREA = 154431. 5Q F T { 3.55 ALRE S) , DIFFERENCE = 8. SQ F'~ 1LOCK 3 AREA = 95986. SQ FT 2.20 AGRES) ACCtJM AREA = 95934. SQ FT ~ 2.20 AGFtESi QIFFERFNCE _ 2. SQ F T 3ROSS ClENSTfiY: 3 LOTS/ACRE NET flE NSITY : 4 LOT'SlACRF L4RGEST LOT: 17459. SQ FT SMALL~ST LOT; 1022. SQ FT AVERAGE LOT: I2038, SO FT # Of LU`[S: 50 . ~ THE FOLLOWING LaTS ARE LESS THAN 10000. SQ FT: BLK LOT SQ FT DiFF PERCENT ~ 2 13 1022* 8978. 89.781 2 14 1137. 8863. 89.634 ~ - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ f - ~ ~ . , LE TTER OF TRANSMIT TAL ,A1R1;ER,"YAKE & WRI(~W To• Date: 79 . Project No. : Attention: Sub ject : S GU~ S~- ~lrv- Appt 77 oA) No. Description R ECEI-VtD . j= v i,, ;19 _d_(~~_C `E1i IAtTV ! Jr~~r~r~u. r 'pbtiw~ PIANNING DEPARTMENT ~ For Apprpval For Your Information ~ As Per Your Request I I ~ ~ ' Remarks : "¢1 ~rs ~l_ ~ T~ ~ ~ 7 -Ad-, Dt 77 o oVI#-,C_ 4)ere- A J(-fP- 1J0-LP-- Q&Cf, 775 MYf- pujP - , . . ~ 207 Great Western Bldg. SPOKANEO wA. B Tel. (509) 624-842o y , , LE T TER OF TRANSMIT TAL &W~~ ~ N][WER."YAKE , TQ : K , Date: 10-5-779 . Pro j ect No. : -0~- , Attention Sub ject : P cJ S G(~~ ~ No. Description ~ r1 c~ c1~ ~-A~- ` ~ Ex - . . u t. ~ M- SmANt PLAlVNING DEPARTMFNT For Approval ~ For Your Information ~ As Per Your Request . Remarks : ~ pf•~ A /U Cef--i-l ,c! 6-&7P- or--- ~L~ 6v~ -A L~f 7- o r ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ 70 207 Great Nestern Bldg. SPOKAK, WA. Tel. (509) 624"$420 y . , . 4. AM EkIC ' ' qL + E C E V E i D E C 5 1978 First American Title Company of =E~COUNTY ~MEPlT MAIN OFFICE ESCROW OFFICE it'est 704 Farst Aven ue Ord er No. 2 2 8 7 9 North 8611 Dtutston • Suate B Spokane, Washcngton 99204 ccs • Spokane Co. Planning Spokane, Washcngton 99208 Phorze. (509) 456-0550 Spokane County Engineers Phone• (509) 484-1600 PLAT CERTIFICATE (AMENDED) To: Arger, Yake and wright Pines west lst Addition 207 Great Western Bldg. Spokane, WA , Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of November 13, 1978 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 4, Township 25 North, Range 44 E.W.M. in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the South quarter corner of said Section 4, said point being on the centerline of Bowdish Road; thence North 890 48'54" East 30 feet to the East line of Bowdish Road which is the true point of beginning; thence North along the East line of Bowdish Road 23.32 feet to the beginning of a curve to the left with a radius of 219.60 feet and a central angle o-Lc 160 48'26"; thence Northwesterly along said curve 64.42 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right with a radius of 20.27 feet and a central angle of 900 ; thonce Northeasterly along said curve 31.84 feet; thence North 16 48126" West 50.00 feet to a point on the Southerly right of way line of the Bur- lington Northern Railroad right of way (formerly Great Northern); thence North 730 11'34" East along 8 aid Southerly right of way line 1887.85 feet; thence South 00 13143" East 700.01 feet to a point on the North line of Mirabeau Ranch Addition according to plat recorded in Volume 4 of Plats, page 16, in Spokane County, Washington and also being on the South line of said Section 4; thence South 890 48'54" West along said North line of Mirabeau Ranch Addition which is also the South line of said Section 4 1799.71 feet to the true point of beginning. Thls company certifies that record title is vested in RALPH GUTHRIE AND GERTRUDE GUTHRIE, as husband and wife, free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, except as follows: NOTES: l. General taxes for 1978 in the amount of $74.94 are paid in full. TaY Account No.: 04544-9021 * CONTINUED * Affiliated xTrh First Amencan Trtle Insurance Company Y~ Page 2 No. 22879 This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. FIRST AMERICAN TITL INSURANCE COMPANY ~ Title Of f icer Larry D. Dunston , v LD/sb , f✓ , ' . LETTER OF TRANSMIT TAL AFJM~ YAKE & WMGHT , 60 L-4-~ , - ro .3 P o (L-A-A.,,e- T r ( Date : f . , Project No.: Attention: ~-0 t--rti ~TvLH e- tL- r Subject ~ EL-Vf~ I~ST 7:::/,,~ST VP1 T/ 0 «J ~ No. Description o r- p (-A--T _ r , I V E R E C E Nnv 1 E PLANNING DEPARTMENI ~ Fpr Approval ~ For Your Information As Per Your Request Remcirks: P s GUr--e'v.- tt5 aF- ~-OA-vs A~ / ~)~7- Y&-c.~- J a Le 1~0 RJ IT ~1 7- fi ~ L l U,~ ,~577 orJ -s ~ O ~ q~ T~-~ll vS rot tw s ! ' G. ~ c,~ . Gw !-~z) _ ~ < l A~so is ~vd~ ,vrv adey 71-IfA. -5 Lf-/ C 207 Great weatern B1dg. SPOKANE, WA. Tel .(549 ) 624,-~20 .y Q ~ ~ . U~ ~ r J ~ ~ p~, ~ s MQ~ ~ ~ pt~'~ ~~u ~ME S, 4 gp p,K~G DEQ pR ~ P~pHN a r , ; ~ 1 ~ r -r'- ~ - L,E T TER OF TRANSMIT TAL &`~;M~ , AR(ZR9)aU To : ~ Date: / , Project No.: Attention: ~b ~ S~u ~ E { Subject: fapif':-5 tt'~r - 1-'rr <1 1- -kvt-21 77 v-o NQ. pescription o-~ ~ F~.~ P IU~ I,v.~ -r~c.~ K~.,~ 1 cop.~ o~ ~~e-- ~-arw uJ• ,I~. ~o w~ ~ ~u ~ r ~ F,C.a-rr C-r ~ For Approval ~ For Your Information ~ As Per Your Request CL ` ~ . Remarks . '(7 ~ t,1o-~ ~ O-L- evd R ~ . ~ E C E I V E Nnv 2 0 1q)78 . s Tv PLANNING DEPARTMENTi 207 Great Kestern Bldg. SPOKANE$ wA. . Tel. ( ~09 ) 624-8420 ~ ~ . , . Pacific Northwest Bell November 13, 1978 Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jerferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Sirs: The Utility easements shown on the Final plat of Pines West - First addition are satisfiactory to the Pacific Northviest Bell Telephone Company. G. D. Fleming Ri ght-of-Way Agent North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 99202 GDF : bh cc: Dean M. Logsdon R E C E V E N 0 V 15 1978 spoKaNE couNTv PLANNING QEPARTMENT , ~ : ~ - - - WWP 3115 REV B 73 r^ r y_ s - THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY d - ` ~ Electric and Natural Gas Service , , . P 0 BOX 3727• SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220•(509) 489 0500 Nov. 14, 1978 Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Gentlemen: The utility easements shown on the final Plat of Pines West First Addition are satisfactory with the Washington Water Power Company. Sincerely, etotoic"klWhittaker Home Builder Representative Spokane Division Marketing cc: Dan Logsdon 207 Great Western Building Spokane, WA 99 201 cm R ECEI IIE NOV 1 51978 SPpKqNE COUNTY PLANN11yG pEPq . RTAyENT 5 E R V I N G T H E i N L A N D E M P I R E 0 F W A S H I N G T 0 N A N 0 I D A H 0 Pacific Northwest Bell November 13, 1978 , Spokane Coun'Ly Planning Commission ' North 811 JzfTerson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Sirs: . ' The Utility easements sho;vn on the Final plat of ' Pines West - First Addition are sati sfactory to the . Paci f i c Northviest Bel 1 Tel ephone Company. , G. D. Fl emi ng Ri ght-of-Way Agent - North 904 Columhus Street SFokane, 4Jashington 99202 GDF:bh cc. • Dean bi.Logsdon R E C E I V E N OV 2 0 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ■WV 3116 REY 1 73 ♦ "Y►3~^'rc'K-~ ~.-!=a~.,~'...~rs~a^+':o► S.~ ~`;+LZ [ O iv /"W1Y+M1rs ~y ~ i _ THE WASHINGTON "~ATFR POWER COMPANY 7" t` b ..,'~"'-:~"`~r` l:lertric und 1Vutural Cas Service . P 0 BOX 3727• SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 992200(509) 489-0500 Nov. 14, 1978 Spokane County Plannin& Cotmni s s ion North 811 Jefferson Spo1cane, lie shington 99 20 1 Gentlemen: The utility eaaements ghawn on the finsl Plat of Pines West First Addition ere eatisfactoacy with the Washfngton Water Power Comprty. Sincerely, ~ 43.&r hu " Wr` Home Buf lder Repreaentative Spokane Division Marketing cc: Dan Logsdon 207 Grest Wasterti Building Spokane, WA 99201 . c~ ~ ~ 4 i t ~ e e v u ~ • u e u . .i n e n e ~ r . . . ~ " ' " ' _ ' _ BLAIR & BLAIR ATTORNEYS AWD COUNSElLORS AT LAW NORTH 221 ARGONPIE RD. SPOKANE, WASNINGTON 99206 TELEDNONE (509) 928-8960 JOHN E. BLAIR, SR. (1910.1951) BURCHAM b BLAIR ROBERT E. BLAIR 1910.1971 ROY J. KOEGEN (CA. ONLY) _ BLAIR fs GERRAUGHTY November 14, 1978 1971•1978 - OF COUNSEL LEWIS H. ORLAND TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: The Irvin Water District No. 6 has an adequate supply of water and sufficient capacity to serve the property owned by Ralph D. Guthrie and Gertrude 0. Guthrie, husband and wife, described as follows: That portion of the Southeast quarter of Section 4, Townsrli.p 25, Nortll, I2ange 44, E.W.M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows: Beginning at the South quarter corner of said Section 4, saicl point being on the centerline of Bowdish Road; thence North 890 48154" East 30 feet to the East line of Bowdish Road; thence North a,long the East line of Bowdish Road 23.32 feet to the beginning of a curve to tge left with a radius of 219.60 feet and a central angle of 16 48'26"; thence Northwesterly along said curve a distance of 64.42 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve to the right with a raclius of 20.27 feet and a central angle of 900 ; thence Northeasterlg along said curve a distance of 31.84 feet; thence North 16 48126" West 50.00 feet to a point on the Southerly right oF way line of the Burlington Northern Railro$d right of way (formerly Great Northern); thence North 73 11'34" East along said Southerly right of cvay line 1,892.26 feet; thence South 00 07'00" West 701.38 feet to a point on the North line of Mirabeau Ranch Addition according to plat recorded in Volume 4 ot plats, PagE 16, in Spokane County, Washington; thence South 89049'04" jlest along said North line of Mirabeau Ranch Addition 1799.71 feet to the Point of Beginning. Very truly yours, R E C E I V E D BLAIR & BLAIR N 0 V 2 41918 ~~ec. Z'a.Z~. e-&j SPOKANE COUIdTY R06ERT E. BLA I R PLANNING DEPARTNfENT Attorney for Di stri ct ~ BEFORE TNE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION & ZONE CLASSIFICATION ) UPGRADING, PE-1140-77, PINES WEST - ) COMMISSIONERS' ACTION ZE-160-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY ) RESIDENTIAL AND/OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ) Hodges, Inc. ) ~ This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, to render its decision concerning the request of Hodges, Inc., East 12715 Mission, Spokane, Washington, for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading; and This matter having been referred to the Board of County Commissioners by the Planning Commission without a recommendation as set forth in the Planning Commission minutes dated November 16, 1977; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on December 29, 1977, at the request of Ralph Guthrie, East 12721 Sprague Avenue, and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Qoard being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to concur in the Staff recommendation from the Planning Department that a declaration of tdon-significance be issued. The Board authorized the Chairman to execute a Proposed Declaration of Non-significance to be prepared and submitted for signature by the Planning Department. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 26 day of January, 1978. VERNON W. OHLAND Cl erk of h~ Board : bY : os nne Montague, Deputy Clerk c~ ~ s.- MOTION FOR PE-114U-77, PINES WEST: Mr. Chairman, after consideration of the Planning Commission recommendation, the evidence and testimony presented at the hearing before this board, the environ- ~ mental review and a personal tour of the site, I'm going to move we approve PINES WEST subject to the conditions as contained in the Plaruzing Staff Findings, except that the following additional conditions shall also be imposed: 1) That duplexes within the plat be limited to the area east of Bowdish Road. 2) That the sponsor provide for a 6 foot security fence along the north plat boundary so as to provide a clearly divided separation from the railroad tracks. 3) That a statement be placed in the plat dedication that unusually high noise levels rnay exist in the area during certain periods of the day. 4) That the plat sponsor make every effort through special construction methods and landscaping to mitigate any possible noise problem that might exist. The plat sponsor is directed to work with the Building Codes Department and the Planning Staff to develop these methods. `I'he Chairman is liereby authorized to sign a final declaration of non-significance. AF -/No rox - - BEFORE THE 60ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE CQUNTY, WASHINGTpN IN THE MaTTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY ) v 2 - SUBDIVISION & ZONE CLASSIFICATION ) UPGRADING, PE-1140-77, PI(UES WEST(CONTINUED ) NpTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING FROM OCTOBER, 1977}, ZE-160-77, AGRICULTURAL ) TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND/OR TWO ) FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: HODGES, INC. ) ~ NQTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, wi11 hold a public hearing at 1:30 P. M., on December 299 1977, at their office in the County Courthouse to consider the above mentioned Preliminary Subdivision and Zone Classification on the following described property: On a Portion of Section 4, Township 25 North, Range 44, E. W. M. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have d significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICF IS FURTHER GIUEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony either for or against the application of the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 8th day of December, 1977. VERNON W, OHLAND CLERK OF THE BOARD BY R anne Montague, Depu y lerk SPOKANE CGUNTY PLANNING COMNtISSION APPE'Am LED North 811 jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 November 28, 1977 Honorable Board of County Commissloners Spokane County Court Hou se ~ Spokane, WA 99201 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commtsston on Mrednesday, November 16, 1977, at 8:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. , reconvening at 2:10 p.m. to 7:15 p.m. in Conference Room "A", County Court House Annex. The enclosed action was taken and Is recommended to the Board of County Cammisstoners. Nir. Maln excused hlmself from dlscusslnn and votinq on items no. 8 and 11 due to a possible conflict of interest. Nrs. Byrne excused herself from discussion and voting on item no. 13, due to the fact that she has not heard any of the prevlous dlscusston on the item. N'embers Present: IVir. NcCoury, Mrs. Byrne, NIrs. Rawlinqs, Niessrs.lViain and ?homas. Pianning Staff present: Dayharsh, Bethards, Deysenroth, Fergen, Mosher, Nunnery and Justice. Engineer's Offlce: Kennaly. Health Dlstrict: Prather Prosecutor's Office: Emaclo. Slncerely, ' SPOKANE CaUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TED MCCOURY, Chairman FRED L. DAYHARSH, Dtrector FLD:kj Offtcal minutes and record of actlon taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at the lr regular hearlnq held on November 16, 1977. .~!!Y O l~ r IvzINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMNIISSION HEARING OF NOVEMBER 16, 1977 `f11HEREAS, the Spokane County Planntng Commlssion did hold a publtc meeting on November 16, 1977 to consider the testimony and requests of several applicants, objectors and other interested partles concerning the below referenced subdlvlstons, zone classification upgradings, extensions of time and other items of business, and WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and 'those opposing aIl items of business, and WHEREAB, Mr: McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, Mr. lviatn and Mr. Thomas were ln attendance and constltuted a quorum, and t WHEREAS, the Spokane County Plannlnq Connmission futly consEdered the tesfiimony given, the envlronmental review, and all other evidence presented, recommends to the Board of County Commtsslaners the following: 1. PN-1124-770 ROBERTSON ADDITION: ROBERTSOIV. That the prellminary subdlvlston to be known as Robert son Addltton (Flle Number PN-1124-77) be approved subject to the eondttions as contained tn the Planning ~ Staff's ftndings, dated November 16, 1977, and that the following condlttons be tmposed: That the following statement be placed ln the ~ plat dedication, "Welts down to 300 foot depth may yteld less than five (5) gallons per mtnute." Also that a proposed declaration of Non-Stgniflcance be tssued. ( Motton by 1V°r. 1Vtain seconded by Mr."Thomas,. Vote was unantmous'_ ) 2. PE-1140-77, PINES WEST: HODGES, INC. t and ZE-160- 77, AGRICUI:- TURAL TQ SINGLE FANILY RESIDE NTIAL and/or TVVO- FAMILY RESIDENTII' Due to a lack of a quorum vote on the appllcation, this ttem as GPnt to the Board with No Recommendatton. There was a motlon requesttng the Board to set a spectal hearing date rather than the applicant requesting thls as the applicant has tried to comply with the variou.s recommendatlons and changes that the Planning Commisslon has made to him. (Mrs. Rawltngs moved, Mrs. Byrne seconded. Mr. Matn moved, Mr. Thomas seconded. Mr. Matn moved and Mr. Thomas seconded. ) 3. FW-1144-77, TIMBER RIDGE: LEESON, and ZV`J-I64-77, UNCLASSIFIED ~ TO AGRICULTURAL : That the prellminary subdivision to be known as Timber Rldge(Ftle number PW-1144-77) be a ~ pproved subject to the condittons as contained in the Planning Staff's findings, dated ~ November 16, 1977, and that a zone classlfication upgrade be approved to the Agricultural zone classiflcatlon (File number ZW-164-77) upon ~ ~ the f lltng of the ftnal plat, and that a proposed declaration of Non-Signl. ~ flcance be issued. ( 1Viotlon by Nrs. Rawlings, seconded by Mr. ~ Nain. Vote was unanlmous.) ; f , l~ ~ J T~ . ~ ' -1 r 4. P'W-1146-77, BARRETT ADDITION: F. S. BARRETT AND CO.; ZW-176-77, , AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAIV: That khe prellminary subdtviston to be known as Barrett Addttlon (File Number PW-1146-77) be approved subject 3 to the condlttons as contained ln the Planning Staff`s flndings, dated November 16, 1977, and that a proposed declaratlon of Non-Slgnlflcance be . Lssued. ( Motton by Mrs. Byrne, seconded by Mrs. Rawlings. Vote was , unanlmous.) ~ s 5. PE-1147-77, CLUMPNER ADDITIOItT: CLUMPNER; ZE-177-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL and/or TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: Due to • the lack of a quorum vote on the applicatton, this itern was sent to the Board L, , with A1o Recommendatlon. Viotion by Mr. Thomas, seconded by Mr.,Maln. rti :Vote wa s 3 ye s a nd 2 no.) ~ 6. PE-1148-77, SILVEY FIRST ADDITION: 3-M ENTERPRISES; ZE-178-771 AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FANiILY RESIDENTIAL and/or TWO-FAMILY RESIDEN- ` TIAL and/or MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: That the preliminary subdlvlslon to ' be known as Sllvey Ftrst Addltlon (Flle Number PE-1148-77) be approved subject to the conditlons as contatned in the Plannlnq Staff's flndings, dated November 16, 1977, and that a zone classiftcatlon upgrade be approved to , r Two-Famlly Residential for Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 and Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, Block 1 and to Stngle Fami ly Res LdentLal Lots 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Block 1 and Lots 3 and 4, Black 2. (Flle Number ZE-178-77) upon the flling of the flnal plat, and that a proposed declaration of Non-Signiftcance be tssued. ( Motton by IVtr. Thomas and Seconded by Mr. Main. Vote was 4 yes and 1 no.) , 7. PE-1149-77, CAMERON HEIGHTS SECOND ADDITTON: BALL and ZE-179-77, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the prellminary subdivi- s[on to be known as Cameron Helqhts Second Addition. (File Number PE-1149-77; be approved subjeck to the condttions as contatned tn the Plannlnq Staff's flnd- ings, dated November 16, 1977, wlth the added condttlons that the roads be brought up to the standards of Terre Verde, and that a zone classtflcatlon upgrade be approved to the Agricultural Suburban Zone Classlficatlon (File Number ZE-179-77) upon the filing of the final plat, and that a proposed declaration of Non-Signtflcance be issued. ( N:otlon by Mr. Maln, seconded by Mrs. Rawlings. Vote was unanlmous.) 8. PE-1150-77, SALTESE RANCHETTES: VIGUE and ZE-180-77, UNCLASSIFIED TO AGRIC,ULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary subdivlston to be known as ~$altese Raiichettes (Plle number PE-1150-77) be approved subiect to the condltlons as contained in the Planning Staff's ftndings, dated November 16, 19771 and that a zone classtficatlon upgrade be readvectlsed to the Agrlcultural Zone for the December hearing, and that a proposed declaratton of Non- Slgni- flcance be Issued. (Notion by Mrs. Byrne, seconded by Mrs. Rawlings. Vote wa s unanlmous. ) r ~r . / v - 2 _ I.~ CV) 9. PE-1151-77, CASTLE COURT: INGALLS and ZE-181-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL and/or TU`.tO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; That the prellmtnary subdivlslon to be known as Castle Cau rt (Flle Number PE-1151-77) be approved subject to the condl~lons as contalned in the Planning Staff;s flndings, dated November 16, 1977 with the added condltions that the roads be curbed and paved to the standards of the County Eng[neer's Offlce, and that a zone classiflcatton upqrade be approved to the Single Family Restdenttal Zone Classiflcatton (Flle Number ZE-181-77) upon the ftling of the f[nal plat; and that a proposed declaratinn on Non-Signlficance be issued. (Notton by N;rs. Rawllnqs seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was unanimous.) 10. PE-1152-77, MOEN FIRST ADCITION: SCHULTZ and ZE-182-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL and/or TWO-FANIILY RESIDENTIAL: That the prellmtnary subdiviston to be known as Nioen F[rst Addltion (Flle Number PE-1152-77) be approved subject to the conditlons as contatned in the Planntng Staff`s flndtngs, dated November 16, 1977, and that a zone classlftcatlon upgrading be approved to the Slnqle Famlly Resldentlal Zone Classtflcatton (Flle Number 2E-182-77) upon the ftlinq of the final piat, and that a propos ed declaratton of Non-Signlficance be issued. (Notlon by Mr. Thomas, seconded by Ivirs. Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.) 11. PE-1153-77, NORTHWOOD SECOND ADDITIQN: ANDERSON and ZE-I83-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FANILY RESIDENTIAL: That the applicatlon be continued to the December, 1977 Planning Commisslon hearing. (Mrs. Rawlings moved, and Mrs. Bycne seconded. Vote was unanlmous.) 12. PN-1154-77, GREEN BLUFF ACRES: FRANCO and ZN-184-77, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the applicatton be conttnued to the December, 1977 Planning Commisslon hearing. (Iv-rs. Rawlings moved, Nr. Iv,aln seconded. Vote was unanlmous.) 13. PE-1046-76, iN"YATT ADDITION NO. 1: V4YATT and ZE-118-76, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL and/or 'T'V1i O-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the reactivatlon of the prevlously approved prellminary plat be approved, (File Number PE-1046-76) subject to the orlglnal condltions wlth the request to the Board of County Commissloners that they requlre paving and curbinq wtth thelr approval. Also lf the plat ts appealed by anyone the applicant ls to pay the ftling fee for the heartng before the Board of County Commissloners. And that a zone classtftcatton upgrade also be reacttved to Stngle Famtly Resldential (Ftle Number ZE-118-77) upon the flling of a flnal plat, and a proposed declaratton of Non-Signlflcance be issued. ( Motton by Mr. Maln , seconded by Nrs. Rawlings. Vote was unanlmous.) 14. PE-960-74, LOCUST VIEV1% FIRST ADDITION: GUNNIATG and ZE-58-74, AGRICULTURAL TO TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the request for an extension of ttme be donled. (Mrs. Rawlings moved, Mrs. Byrne seconded. Vote was unantmous. ) 15. Mrs. Rawlings moved and N'r. N••ain seconded that we approve the Capablllty report wlth revlstons as presented. The report is to be used in coniunction with other reports in the development of the Comprehenslve Plan. The motion would exclude a dlsclaimer clause. (Motion passed unanlmoualy..) 40 - 3- 16. Tom Mosher of the Planning Lepartment's Staff reported on: 1. The recently completed contract wtth National Heritage, Inc., Pullman, Washington, whlch pulled together extsting tnformatton on the htstorlcal and acchaeolog 1ca! re source s of the County. 2. The Htstorical Preservatton Commtttee of the junlor Leaque where Clty and county progress were dlscussed. An addtttonal toptc of discusston was an , upcoming propoeal to the Clty and County governments to work toward ' establishment of a City-Caunty Landmarks Commission. 3. A currently developing proposal to seek, wlth a cooperative agreement ; wlth the City of Spokane, A 50-50 matching grant from the State's Offlce of Archaeotogy and Historic Preservatton to Hlre a Preservatlon Planner and . subsequently expand the preservatton activitles wlthin the County. 17. Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Lirector of Plannlnq., brought to the Planning Commission': ` ':tentlon a need to set ahead the flling date for preltminary plats and zone changes. An ~ amendment to Lhe Zoninq Ordlnance and a resolutlon by the County Commissloce will be needed tomake this change in pollcy. A motlon was made to direct the staff to recommend amendments as to the cut-off date for zone chanqes and 3 plats, also all field work ls to be done prlor to the flitng of the prellmtnary ~ zone changes and plats in the Planntng Departrnent Offtce. (Motlon by Nirs. 'Rawlings, seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was unanlmous.) ~ 18. The members of the Planning Commission discussed the revlew period of the ~ ~ Flve-Mtle Draft EIS. A motlon was made by 1Virs. Rawtings and seconded by Mrs. Byrne that an extenslon of tlme of the comment perlod of the Draft EIS ~ for Five-Mtie be extended to December 1, 1977. The Staff was dtrected to write a letter to the City to that effect. It was requested that a Ctty Staff member be present at further dlscusslon. Nrs. Rawlings was concerned about ~ not getting recommendations up from the Coordlnatfng Commlttee. It was sugges ted that on Frtday's Planning Commtsston hearing that Staff and Planning Commisslon member could have some observatlon on that ttem. Mr. McCoury agreed that ft could be done. . Mr. Maln excused hlmself from dlscusston and voting on Items No. 8 and lI, due to a possible confllct of lnterest. Mrs. Byrne excused herseif from dlscusston and voting on Item No. 13, due to the ~ ~ fact that she has not heard any of the previous dlscusslon on the Item. ~ ~ Planning Staff pcesent: Dayharsh, Bethards, Ueysenroth, Fergen, Nunnery, Niosber ; and justice, f ~ Englneer's Office: Kennaly. Health D[strict: Prather. Prosecutor's Offtce; Emaclo. ~ LIATED THIS 28TH DAY OF NCVEMBER, 1977. ~ ~ BY: KATHLEEIV jUSTICE ~ Planning Commission Secretacy , For: Ted IvEcCoury Pianning Commissloh Chairman ~ Fred L. Dayharsh e ~ - 4 - DlrecLor of Planning ~ ' AGENDA, NOVEMBER 16, 1977 'lELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: Wednesday, November 16, 1977, 8:00 A. M. Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION UPGRADING 2. PE-1140-77, Pines West (Continued from October, 1977) ZE- 160-77, Aqricultural to Stnqle Family Residentlal and/or Two-Family Resldential a. Location: Section 4, Townsh ip 25 N., Range 44, E.W. M. Par of the SE 1/4 of sect ion 4, more( particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the South line of said Section 4, 30 feet West from the SE corner of said section; thence N along a llne 30 feet V1l from and parallel to the E line of said Section 4, 424.5 feet to a point 65 feet S of the NE corner of Lot 24 in Block S of Palisades, as per map of Palisades recorded in Book "D" of Plats, page 28, which plat is now vacated; thence W 200 feet along a line 65 feet from and parallel to the N line of Lots 24, 23, 22 and 21, in said Block S of Palisades, thence N 36.5 feet along the W llne of Lot 21 in sald Block S of Palisades; thence S 861154'W, 333,5 feet; thence S 126 feet; , thence W 246 feet; thence N 387 feet to a polnt on the Sly line of the right of way of the Northern Pacific Railway Company; thence SWly along the Sly line of said right of way, 1917.8 feet to a point on the N and S 1/4 line of said section 4; thence S along said 1/4 line 154.5 feet to the S I/4 corner of safd section 4; thence E along the S lfne of said Sectfon 4; 2616, 7 feet to the POB. Except any portion lying within parcels 1 and/or 2; Tracts 1 through 7, Fairacres, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, page 16; also except that portion conveyed to Spokane County by Instrument recorded as Document No. 7607200271; also except that pottion conveyed to Spokane County by instrument recorded as Document No. 7703220225; all situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. b. Sponsor: Hodges, Inco East 12715 Mlssion Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineer and Surveyor: Senske and Masgai East 9723 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 do Sfte Slze: 24 acres e. Number of lots: 65 fo Land use proposed by sponsor: Stngle famfl y dwellings and duplexes g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established April 24, 1942 h. Advertised Zone Upgrading: Single Family Residential and/or Two-Famlly . Residential i. Water Source: Irvin Water District j. School Dtstrict; West Valley School District ko Method of Sewage Dlsposal: Individual on-site disposal systems 1. Environmental Impact: A toplc of di scu s s ion at thi s hearing may be whether or not this proposal wtll have a signiftr --tnt adverse environmental impact. (tilLctnity map on following page) -2- ~ FINDINGS - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISICN AND [CNE CI.IaSSIFICATION UPGRALING PE-1140-77 - PINES WEST: HGLGES, INC. ZE- 160-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDFNTIAL and/or TNiO- FAMILY RESILENTIAL Staff flndings regardtng PE-1140-77, Plnes V. est. ` As the Planntng Commisston may recall, thls ltem was contlnued to t hls hearing in order that the applicant might further work wlth the Staffs of the Englneer's Office and Planning Uepartment to minimtze ctrculatlon problems ln the areg. The appltcant has met wlth the Staffs and lt has been determined that the proposed plat should be redeslgned to connect the proposed cul-de-sacs located near the east property 1tnE of the plat. 1. GENER.AL INFORN~ATIGN: A. Locatlon Pines V1"est is located ln the north eentral area of the Spokane Valley, south of Trent Avenue and west of Pines Road. B. Proposal The applicant proposes to subdivtde approxlmately 14 acres into 63 lots, 31 of whlch are planned for duplexes. The proposa 1 wouid creatt a gross denslty of about 3.9 unlts/acre with a typ lcal lot stze of about 100 200 square feet. C. Relatlonshtp to the Comprehenslve Plan ' Plnes West Is located wlthtn an area that has been deslgnated as suttable for resldenttal development by the Spokane County Comprehen- slve Plan. - D. Exlsting Land Uses The stte ts presently vacant with minor dratnage problems. The proper- tles to the south have developed over the years tnto several restden- tial subdlvtsions. To the east ls the Trent Elementary School, whtle to the north is Trent Avenue and several ratlroad [racks. E. Compattblllty wlth Exlsting Land Uses The Staff belteves that thls proposal would be compattble wlth the extsting development to the south and that rhe duplexes would form• an appropriate buffer from the severa 1 ra t lroad tracks to the nocth. -2- , IF, .1 ~ J40-77 - PINES V11ES1' ,-)ntinu.:d) ' . ~ , 4 11. SPECIl3.L TNFGRNtA1I01ti': ~ A. Circulacion : As was mentionud abov,;~ with the r2design as suggzsted the plat , ~ dasign would be acceptabla to the Enginezr's Offlce. ~ , B. ;;ewage Disposal , 1'he Spokane- County H%~.alth District has approvad the sitc: for on-site. = ~ s~-_wag:; disposal. However, the propos%;.-d subdivision lies oyer th.; , ~pokane Valley aquifer, 'ihe Distrlct balieves that approval of this subdivision will hava a negligible immadiata impact upon the water ~ quality, but continuc:d urbanization at this density can be expected 1 to have at laast moderatc; impact upon tha vvator quality. , a C. vVatar ~ 4 ~ Irvin vvat%;~r District has stated it ha;► tha ability to s.:rve the proposad subdivision with bath duomustic and fireflows. ~ D. Firte ~ Protection , , Both mains and hydrants need to bo. installad to provlde. for addquata flreprotection , E . 3chool s ih%;; proposal is situated withfn tht; boundarias of the East Vallay School Di strict 4vhere the Di strict f acliitie.; are at capacity leval s. '1'he Dis- trict expects this problem to bo. irlitigatzd somawhat yvhen their current building program is compluted in two or three yea s time. F. Parks IJo county parks ara curr3ntly avallable, in tha area and the County Parks Dk:partment has no prasc:nt plan for zlth::r sitz acquisition of ma jor park improve m.,:!nts. -2k- ; ~ ~ ~ _140-77 - PINES ~'VES1 ztinu~d) ~ lll. ENVIRONMEN'rAL P.EVIE~,,V: i Staff of the Planning Departmznt has rc:viewzd thj chk:cklist aa submittad ; by the applicant and tha 3taff r~ecorrim.:ncls that a rleclaration of Non-significanca be issued. ~ ~ . .117. CONDI'lIOIVS: ~ If approval i:; grantad, the, Staff racornmc;ncis the following condltions: : Speific conditions applicabla to this plat are referenced balo-vv and fou nd in ~ the attached supplement entiitlad, "Standard Conditions for Approval of Pralimi- ~ nary Ylats - August, 1977. N01'E: Any amendments to said conditi4ara statad seperately and listad below. " P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, P-6, P-7, P-8, P-9 (Deczmber 1, 1978), P-13, ~ ~ E-11 E-21 E-3, E--4, E-5, E-6, A-1, H-1, H-5, H-6, That. all roads within the plat be curbed and/or paved to the speclficatlons of the County Engineer; existing County roads providing diru-ct access to lots of the plat shall be pav2d and/or curbed to standards of th.; County Engfnk?aer. !hat the plat bz redesigned to connoct tha presently propos4d dead-end cul-de-sacs locate-d n%;~-ar the. east property lin.; . 111at the. sponsor providc; for :valkway conn~.,ctlons to the school sita to the east in locations accaptable to the county angineer. Improvements shall include a paved pathway and fencing of walkway connc:ctlons. Ehat prior to filing of the final plat, the dralnag.: pLan shEill bu approvQd by thp- County Health Di strict . No on-sita szwage dYSposal systerns shall be. locatc:d on lots 10, 11, 12, Block 2. i'hat all lots propostA for duplexes nav.: a minimum of 90 faat of frontage and 11,000 square fazt of lot uraa. 11 ' Upgrade all of Block 1, lots 1-8, Block 2, lots 1-4, 7, Q,13-16, Block 3 and lots I-9, Block 4 to iwo-Family nasiddntial the rocnaindt.:r to ~ingla Family P.asidential. fhat the propos.:d ~:itersection of Bowdish Road and the proposad northeasterly- : southwe-sterly nghts-of-way be radc;sign.:d to the satiafactlon oi the County Engineer's Offic2. ° _Z g b ~ ~ ~ , ~ V t EDWARD L. SM1TH, P. E. ' CONSULTMdG ENGMdEER 12121 E. MANlRIELO SPOKAN[. WAiNINGTON oOZOs 02d-A3o4 Febru.ary 27, 1978 Spokane County Plazlning Department N 811 Jefferson St. ~ Spokane, Washington 99201 ~ r ~ CRef: PE -1].40-?7~ Gentlemen: : On behalf of Irvin Water D istrict #6, I wish to call to your attention ' that there is a water well site at the corner of Federick Avenue and Bowdish Avenue. The proposed plattor of PE-1140-77 should be made aware that State Health Regulations require 150 ft radius around such a well to nearest sewage facility. This should be taken into account in the design of their Plat. S incerely, , E dward L. Smith, P.E. ' R E C E I V E rE B 2 71q78 - SPOKANE COUNTY 4v d PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9;)p ~ ~ Ar % ~ FI NDI NGS PE-1140-77 - PINES WEST: HODGESt INC. ZE- 160-77 - AGRICULTURAL TQ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL andlor TWO- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL , Staff flndings regardinq PE-1140-77, Plnes West: I. GENERAL INFORMATION: ~ A. Locatlon Plnes W est !s located tn the north central area of the Spokane Valley, south of Trent Avenue and west of Plnes Road. B. Proposal The appllcant proposes to subdlvide approximately 24 acres lnto 63 lots, 31 of whlch would be f,or duplexes. The proposal would create a gcoss denstty of about 3.9 unlts per acre with a typlcal lot slze of 10, 200 square feet. C. Relatlonshlp to the Comprehenslve Plan ` k Plnes West is located wtthln an area that has been desiqnated as sultable for resldential development by the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan. D. Exl s ti ng Land U se s The site ls presently vacant with minor drainage problems. The propertles to the south have developed over the years lnto several restdentlal subti[vtsions. To the east is the Trent Elementary 5chool, whtle to the north ls Trent Avenue and several railroad tracks. E. Compattbtlity wlth exlsting land uses. The Staff belleves that the proposal ts compattble wlth the existing devel- opment !n the area (located to the south) and that the duplexes would provide an appropriate buffer from the non-resldentlal uses to the north. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION: A. Circulatlon The Engineer's Office has reviewed the proposal and they are quite concerned about the apparent lack of adequate access to the project. The proposal as presented by the sponsor contalns only one potnt of access . (Bowdlsh Road) to serve a majorlty of the property. -4- . ~ PE-1140-77 - PINES V'TEST (Conttnued) Speclflc condlt[ons appllcablQ to this plat are referenced below and found in the attached supplement entttled, "Standard Condtttons for Approval of Prellmi- nary Piats - August, 1977". 1VOTE: Any nrnendments to satd condtttons are stated separately and ltsted below. , P-1, P- 2, P- 3, P- 4, P- 5, P- 6, P- 7, P- 8, P- 9( Ivove mber I, 1978), P-13, E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6, A-1, Fi-1, H-5, H-6. , That all roads wlthin the plat be curbed and/or paved to the speciflcations of the County Enqlneer. Exiscing County raads providtng dtrect access to lots of the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to standards of the County Engi neer. Prlor to filing of the final plat the County Health Dlstrlct shall approve the drainage plan. No on-slte sewage disposat systems shall be permttted on those lots as lndlca- ~ ted on the prellmtnary plat of record. That the walkway as shown on the prellminary plat of record be improved to the standards of the County Eng tneer. ~ , i~ ,i r~- 4 B - - - C7FFICE OF CaUNTY ENGMEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ Dvte I~-~ 197 7 inter-offic_- Communication To aLANNING COt'ti'IISSIUN GARY iCEh-NALY, I'LANNING & TtZr1FrIC DIVISION CNGINEER bW1(- f rom Subject CO'! [T ,[0' 1 ~ * FOR ~ 14-0 ~ CJ►'•:DtTIGidS CIriCLLD Gi'Pi.`L 1'0 t'Lh^ J'.iR CO?;JI:JEf%A'.ION thzt condit=onal approval of the plat is givza subject to dedication of, Right of - ;Tzy to the puSlic and approval of the road sys te3 in the plat by the County ~noiaezr-; . . 2} ehat plans, profiles, and cross sections showino proposed street centerliae aad ceirb " grades be subrsitted to the County Enoineer for 2pproval prior to constructioa and the iiling of a final plat; - . . - 3 j that draia?oe plans and desiga calculations showing the gradz9 aad aligr=eut of drain- age iacilities be submitzed to the County Engineer for approval pzior to coastruction a:►3 the filing of a fioal pla[; . ~ . - , 4.~ cons truction within the proposzd public streets and easements shall be performed ~ under tha direct sup_rvision of 2 licensed laad surveyor, who shall be resgonsibl.e for perpetuating all evidence of the Iocation o~ survey tcornuaents ~~hich may bz distu:bed during construction and c~ho shall furnish the County Ec~iueer w~.th "As Jauilt" plaas and a certificate in Writino that zll imp:ovements ware installed to the Iines an3 grades shown on the zpproved construction plans and that all disturbed monum=nts have been replaced; . r- Ono cunstructioc; work is to be ?erc'oxmed within the Public Rf,ght of Way until a Ferntit f h=s opzn issuad by the County zn;ineer. All c.•ork is subjeet to insp2ctioa and approva? by the County En3izeer; ~ . . f~all cons[ruction ufthin the Public Right of Way is to be co,nple[ed px-lor to filing th2 f ir.al plat or a bond in th= z.-~ount es tiaaa~ed by the County Enginaer to cover the cost oi construction of improv2menLs, construction cert£ficatioa, "As Built" plaas, and monumsnting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engi^..zzr. - 7-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additional right of ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Rnads. . 8-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are construcKed to County Standards and established as County Roads. 19-road desi.gn, rough grading construc[ion, and drainage control for 172 rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. . 10-[hat the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal eccept- able to the State xigtiWay Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road inter- section. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the respon- sibility of the Sponsor and may either he constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnfshed to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the'County Engineer and the State Highway Department. E 11-4that al.l roads within the plat be curbed and/or paved to the snecifications of the County "Engineer. Rxisting County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. 12- } DL-Si4~c/ d ,~'c~,Q!7 5%= rv - _ ~S Con/n1~ -C - T 1-2126SC-i_&J74-V `'lt►- ~ ~:5~ ~ DE- ~N~~/! CtJC-DC~•'?t5 L ~ c f't/ /Z ~i1~'~f~t~Z~"/ ~~,~L !3 J L r-e . ro ,.,vc e _.i~c~-_ia ~=--~ni _ ~N ~ 0~ ~v~l.J~w~ 1~ Cv.~/n~E ~-.•-i a S.. ° - ~ nP OF.k .~E OF Ct~UNTY EY~G_ EIER ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON DafP 0 t.T~eIC~Z-- 19 '7'1 lnier-office Communicotion ~ 'To PLANNING C01MISSION , S~<< , from GARY KENNALY, PL.4NNZNG & TRt1FFIC DIVISION ENGINEER = subjecr P-c ~;n corrDTTzoNIS * FOR P~ 1140 -11 Pi NcS WC ST ~COIdDIT IOi•IS C rRCLED Ai'~ LY TU PLAi Ui'jD.n CO.ISIDER.ALI0Ir ' s D thzt conditional approval of the plat is givzn subject to dedicatfort of Rigiit oF i slJay to the pu5lic and approval of the road syste3 in the plat by the County IvErgiaezr; . 2~. tha[ plans, profiles, and cross sections shoWin; propo9ed strzet centerZiue and curb ' grades be submitted to the County Engineer for 2pproval pr3.or to coastructioa and , the filing of a final plat; . . , • . that dr2inaoe plans aad de9ign calculations shoaing the gradzs aad alig=ent of drain- aoe faci2i[ies be submitted to the Couaty Engineer for approvaL prior to consvzuction an3 the filing of a final plat; _ . - . - 1 ~cons-uruction within the proposed public streets and easecaents shalI be perforLZed under the direct supervision of a licensed Iaad surveyor, who sha13 be responsibZe for perpetuatin; all evidence of the 3.ocation oi survey monu:aents whiclz may bz distu:bzd during construction and who shall furaish the CouTtp Ecgineer uith "As Jluilt" plans and a certificate in writino that zIl imp=ovements ware iastailed to the lines and grades shocm on the 2pproved construction plans and that a..lZ di.stu=bed mon=ants have been replaced; . . no construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way uuti.l a FarraYt h;s oeen issuad by the County zngineer. All c.•ork is subject to inspaction aztd approval by the County Engineer; _ ~all construction within the Public Right of Way is to be catnpleted pz-ior to filing the f ir.al plat or a bond in the amount es timated by the County Engineer to cover the eost oz coaatruc[ion of improv2aea[s, constructioa certificativn, "as Bui2t" plaus, _and :-.on:mianting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County En,oiaaer. 7-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additional right of 'ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads. ~ - . 3-no direct access frocn lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. ►-road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for 172 rights of ways - and Stub Road connections are the responsibiliCy of the Developer. D-that the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal accept- able to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road inter- section. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design mus[ be recetved prior to, the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the respon- sibility of the Sponsor and may either he constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnislled to the County Engineer in the aaiount as determined by the'County ' Engineer and the State Highway Deparrment. .11 that all roads iaithin the plat be curbed and/or paved to the snecifications of the County Engineer. aistin~ Cou.~ty roads providi.ng direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved andf or curbed to the standards of the County Engineer•. lo~ . AGENDA, OCTOBER 14, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: ' Friday, October 14, 1977, 9:00 A. M. Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) 4. PE-1140-77, Pines West ZE- 160-77} Aqricultural to Sinqle FamllY Residential and/or Two-Familv Residential p ry L f ~ o r , vtllLllaY ~ ' d~~y"~ ~ ~ -A~ ~ y+ ~ • }i I l 1 ~ f ' • ( • in1 /YM1f ~ 7 ° ~ ~ . ~o.k ~ • , u~tr f ~ I • sI ~ /t //!o . • • ~'.~-~~..W.++' - ♦ _ . ~ `~'y Y~ .....Y S• ~ ;i r ~ I ~ ~y ' ~ • • ~ ~ s " ~ ~ ~ ' o:s I , 4 I:~ ~ ~ ~ CTF~I • ` I I I rsy's1~~ Mf► ~/ON S~• ~ ~ ~ ~ ~„o, ~ ~ ~ - • ` r- _ - ' • ~ ~ = r 2 ~l Il.~ ; ► y~~l Sy .,l~p I ~vR , • ~ '•pC ~ • ~ Mf 1~. .,c. " ~ , . ~ ,bd, . ...~in. ~uri~ ~ ~~rM+~~• M , ~ ' y ` ~ y I11 •w y ~~t'' L~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ l ~ ~ • lo ~ ~ , r • 41 " • ~ ~ r~rro. ~u~ ~ ~T /l ~~Ilr 1w~K•.or ~ ~as~~- - /N[CWA• 1 s~~ 1~f ~ '1o% _ • J . ~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ l~ 9o A v ~ IU~N M1~ ..s r ~ . . . . II ~ ~ I , ■ ■ ~ 4A ~ aV ~ ~ II i ~ i 1. a FINDINGS PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISICN AND ZCNE CLASSIFICATIONUPGRADING PE-1140-77 - PINES VVEST: HGLGES, INC. ZE- 160-77 - AGRICULTURAL T4 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL and/or TWO- FA MI LY RE S I LE NTIA L , Staff findings regarding PE-1140-77, Plnes V1~ est. As the Planning Commisslon may recall, thls ltem was contlnued to t hls hearing ln order that the appllcant mtght further work with the Staffs of the EngLneer's Offlce and Plannlnq Lepartment to minimtze clrculatlon problems tn the area. The applicant has met with the Staffs and lt has been determined that the proposed plat should be redeslgned to connect the proposed cul-de-sacs located near the east property ltne of the plat. I. GENERAL INFORNj.ATION: A . Locatlon ~ Pines M"est is located ln the north eentral area of the Spokane Valley, , south of Trent Avenue and west of Pines Road. B. Proposal , The applicant proposes to subdivlde approxlmately 14 acres tnto 63 lots, 31 of whlch are planned for duplexes. The praposa 1 would creatE a gross denslty of about 3.9 unlts/acre wtth a typ lcal lot size of about 10, 200 square feet. C. Relatlonship to the Comprehenslve Plan - Ptnes West ls located wlthln an area that has been deslgnated as t suitable for residentlal development by the Spokane County Comprehen- ~ slve Plan. t ~ , , D. Exlsting Land Uses The slte is presently vacant with minor dralnaqe problems. The proper- tles to the south have developed over the years into several reslden- ttal subdtvlslons. To the east ls the Trent Elementary School, while to the north ls Trent Avenue and several rallroad tracks. E. Compatlbiltty with Existtng Land Uses The Staff believes that thls proposal would be compatible with the existing development to the south and that the duplexes would form an approprlate buffer from the several ra[lroad tracks to the north. _2_ ncw) ~-o i , • ~ PE-1140-77 - PINES VNES't' • kuontinued) 11. SPECIAL INFORMAl'IOIV: A. Cjrcularion As livas mentionvd abova with the redesign as suggested the plat dasign would ba acceptabla to the Enginear's Offlce. , B. Sewage Disposal fha Spokane County Health District has approvad the site for on-sita sewage disposal. However, the proposad subdivision lies dver the Spokane Valley Aquifer, The Distnct belitaves that approval of this subdivision will have a negligible immediate impact upon tha water quality, but continued urbanization at this dansity can be expc:cted to hav~ at least moderate impact upon the water quality. C. "vVater Irvin v4atar District has stated it has the ability to serve the proposed subdivision with both deomc:stic and f.reflows. D. Fira Protection Both mains and hydrants nead to be installad to provide for adequatz flieprotection. E. Schools iha proposal is situated within the boundarias of the East Valley School Di strict where the Di stnct fac~litie s are at capacity leval s. 3'he Di s- trict expects this problem to ba mitigated somawhat when their current buildinq program is completed in two or three year s time. F. Parks . No county park s are curra ntly av ail abla in the are a and the C ounty Parks Department has no prasent plan for alther site acquisition of ' major park improvemants. ' - 2 A - ; i ~ 1 I ~,o PE-1140-77 - PINES VvEST . ontinued) 111. ENVIRONIVIEN`rAL P.EVIEW: '1hz Staff of tha Planning Departmant has reviewed tha checklist as submittzd by the applicant and tha 5taff r%;comrnezcls that a declaration of Non-significance be issued. IW. CONDI'tIONS: If approval is granted, the Staff recommends the following condltions: Spei.fic conditions applicable to this plat are referenced below and faund in the attached supplement antitlad, "Standard Conditions for Approval df Pralimi - nary Plats - August, 1977. NOiE: Any amendments to said conditins ara stated seperately and listad below. P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-S, P-6, P-7, P-8, P-9 (December 1, 1978), P-13, E-11 E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6, A-1, H-1, H-5, H-6. That all roads within the plat be curbed and/or paved to the spacifications of the ~ County Engineer; existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to standards of the County Enginaar. , ihat tha plat ba redesigned to connect thz prc:sently proposed dead-end cul-de-sacs locatfad near the east property lYne. Tliat tha sponsor provide for walkway connect.Lons to the school site to the aast in locatians accaptable to the county angrnear. Improvements shall include a paved pathway and fencing of walkway connc:ctions. 1'hat prior to filing of the final plat, the drainaga pLan shall be approvc:d by the County Health District. No on-site sewage disposal systems shall be locatc:d on lots 10, 11, 12, Block 2. ` 1'hat all lots proposed for duplexe s have a minimum of 90 feet of frontage and 21, 000 square feet of lot araa. Upgrada all of Block 1, lots 1- 8, Block 2, lots 1-4, 7,8,13-16, Block 3 and lots 1-9, Block 4 to i'wo-Family Residential th-a ramaindor to Singla Family Residential. That thz proposed intersection of Bowdish :2oad and tha proposed northeasterly- southwesterly rights-of-way ba redesignad to tha satisfaction of the County Enginear's Offace. -2 B - ~ ~ _ ~~p~E CpGy ~ h rr SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTN DISTRICT ~ Inter-Offi ce Communi cation 4~rH p`S1 Date: October 11, 1977 , T0: Spokane Countv PlanninQ Co issiQn _ ROM : 6S: GU~ F Eugene Sharp .2.s and ~aei eC_ Pra thP_ A c SUBJECT: Proposed urelimina;y Pla - PTN.,~_WFST 1. References: a. Map of subject, scale 1" a 100' by Senske & Masgai; undated, r'eceived by this office September 8, 1977. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Re- sources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the SPokane Valley, D.K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metro- , politan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, ' April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D..A., March, 1968. e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. ; ~ f. Logs of Irvin Water District wells in Township 25, Range 44, Sections 9 & 4. ' g. Field Survey Report, Gene Sharp, Spokane County Health District, Septem- " ber 27, 1977. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973 and Spokane N E, U.S.G.S., ~ 1973. ' 2. Topography, soils and water. a a. This project lies in a relatively flat area between Opportunity and Trent Avenue. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located ~ over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5°6 slopes. ~ They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with possible 1contamination of groundwater. ' ~ c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and ~ gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked ~ by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large , amounts of water. 4-6 SCND-ADM-118 C/ t)) ; r ' t PINES WEST Page 2 October 11, 1977 d. The data f rom 2 Irvin Water District wells in the area shows the wells are 117 to 125 feet deep and have static water levels varying from 78 to 91 feet below the surface. The total nitrogen level was 1.67 ppm. The Irvin Water District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. a. The plat sponsor has proposed 66 lots on 24 acres. Each lot is,to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage dis- posal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd ronsidered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitation years subaurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por- tion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phos- phates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater' flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol- ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mgll (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/1. The forecase year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."---"The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when com- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentrati+nn, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ulrimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.49 to 1.67 ppm. A projected incre- mental increase using Dr. Tadd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges 1.61 PPm. to 1.81 ppm. Current Federal and StaCe drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: l0 ~ J4 ~ Y ^ 1 ~ AL PINES WEST Page 3 October 11, 1977 (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge f rom the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as la- goons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. ~ 4. Recommend that: a. A public water system including fire flows serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. b. Each lot be authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage system. c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of eighty-four (84) dwelling units are authorized within the plat. d. Lots 10-11-12, Block 2, be declared unbuildable due to the required 150 foot set back between drainf ield and a public water well. Public well is located on Lot 11. Alternatives would include either a public sewer system or abandonment 8nd deatruction of the well to the satis- faction of the Health District. e. A low area near Lot 8, Block 2 and Lot 1, Block 3, be designed to in- clude a cluster of dry wells to accept any waters that might tend to gather in this area. cc: Senske b Masgai Engineer, Inc. Y, . , . • , .14 . • . 400till ✓ E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APP'LICATION FORM AREA AND DISTANCE ■0000(300000000000ooooOOO000oo00OO00ooODOOOOOOOOO0O000o000000000 Total a,nount of land in this Subdivision: 24 Acres Proposed density of the Plat: 2.7 Lots/Gross Acre '1'otal amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 0 Acres Proposed use of controlled adjoining land: _alDl~ icable Wtiat is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? Shopping facilities? 1)~ Municipal Boundary: ~ Paved street or highway? 0_ LAND USE 000 000000000000O0o00000000000oOO0000000000 000000000000000000000O000000 Indicatc the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings ( X). Duplexes ( x). Indicate lots for duplexes: Blk 4, Lots 1 thru 9; Blks, Lots 1-4,7,8,13-16 ,Pc~~)iWXM.VWXxxx))c7cxliialb~~~lxkxv- Blk 1, and Blk 2, Lots 1-8 ft&UXg)MAAX MoUile flomes ( Other ( Describe other uses: Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: , What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? vacant , List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture:. acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: 24 ~acres. Other: Acres I s keeping of animals desired? No ( X Yes ( Type : I+IPROVEMENTS ■ooooo00000000000000000000000000000000000oooooaoooOOOOOOOOOOaooooo0 Do you plan to i'ile the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will it be a multi-phase dev- elopment? Entiretv To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( Minimum. Curb ancI Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( X Describe any combinations of above: , What is the time pe_riod expected for complete development of the Plat: Jul,y 1978 Street -_mprovements completed? laly 1978 • Substantial number of lots occupied? Jan. 1979 I5 dedi,;ation of any land for public use contemplete3? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( Yes ( x). Describe: Pedestrian walk (as shown) Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 1200 Square feet Number of bedrooms 2 • Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( x). Yes ( Will any special deed restrictions be included in tne sale of lots? PVo ( x). Yes ( If "yes", explain: . UTILITIES ■oooooooocooooo00000000000000oooooDOOOOaooooooooooaooooo0000000000000 Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank C x). Lagoon ( Treatment plant ( Other, or -combinations (Describe) • • , tndicate the proposed source of water supnly: Individual wells ( Public system ( x). Private community system ( Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements ( Overhead utility easement8 ( X). ~`~t1►~ Utilities in streets ( No easements ( Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main: 0 Indicate size of nearest main: >12 Inches. List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: Electricity: lap Gas: N.A. Water: Phone: PNB 1 N. ~ • ~ i E X H I B I T A Page 2 PRELIMINARY PLA7.' APPLSCATION FORM (Continued) .CKNOWLEDGMENTS 6 0 00000 000 13 0 00 000000 000000000000000000Oa0000000000000 0 0 0 0 0 0000000 ~ ?ROFOSED PLAT NAME: UnPq West , C, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has )een prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane .:ounty Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. f ilcv 1). ~V . ~ ~10a~••• ~•'~0~ ~'ASigned) Date: 4„f15,(27 ~ 2: ddress) 9,?23 ~ ~ , Sipprazguy Phone: 9?4--i759 a: 157 • ? 40 , Spokane, Wa. Zip; 99206 ~ •ti ~'`~~i~ •.~~lSTE~~~O . ~~J S SUR'tEYOR'S-=SEAL : please print I, << 1~4 ~•,a 14 sj ~~the sponsor of thi s proposed subdsvision, am the owner builder agent option holder ( contract holder ( of the property proposed to be platted and have completed the information requested of ine and do hereby testify that it is correct and accurate. ~ (Signed) Date: 9/15/77 . f . . ` (Address) Hodge ? nc. Phone: 924-3040 ; E 715 Mission rr` p kane, Wa. Zip : 9921 " NOTARY G..~ Date : 9-19A " 77 117 NCTARY SEAT, : ~ ~ Speclal Comments: ' ~ ~ . , . , . , , ~ • ~ ~ . 7 : ~ ~ w. `A. • i ► a . . 300000000000oooooo• THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING DEPARTMIINT •MOWGooooo0000000• PLANNING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION . ~ Date Submi tted : Checked by: School Di stri ct : U2L2,Aj Preliminary Plat Fee : , Existing Zoning: ~ Date established: ~`4 L Zone Change Flle No. ~U --7 ~ i~ Advertised Zone Upgrading: IL-l_ Number of Lots: ~oS Location: Section ~ Township Z~ Range ._.J.J" Plat File No.: Plat Name: ~