Loading...
Agenda 05/27/2004 SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Council Chambers - City Hall 11707 E. Sprague Avenue 6:30 p.m.-9:30 p.m. * * * May 27, 2004 * * * „--.: ,x>taw=.zr -��.y-r,.:.:.v, }a-:.#r�:..na,.sty,.e,. -?a:.-,. ..e...,;::sc-a`.u .^=3.a`>.iw. c��.+,5.s...• ...xi: w..�._ ..,_.s.�,. .._,::✓7 I. CALL TO ORDER II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE III. ROLL CALL IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES • May 13, 2004 VI. PUBLIC COMMENT VII. COMMISSION REPORTS VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS New Business: • Public Hearing—2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments (Remand) • Discussion of Comprehensive Plan Private Utilities Chapter Draft X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER XI. ADJOURNMENT COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF Fred Beaulac Marina Sukup, AICP Robert Blum Greg McCormick,AICP John G. Carroll Scott Kuhta,AICP David Crosby Debi Alley William Gothmann, Chair Gail Kogle Ian Robertson, Vice-Chair www.spokanevalley.orq City of Spokane Valley Request for Planning Commission Review DATE: May 27, 2004 TYPE: ❑ Consent ❑ Old Business ❑ New Business ® Public Hearing ❑ Legislation ❑ Information ❑ Administrative Report AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2003 Annual Comprehensive Plan Amendments— Rehearing GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Zoning Code, Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN: Recommend approval of Comprehensive Plan Amendments as described below. BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan provides for an annual comprehensive plan amendment process. The deadline for submitting comprehensive plan amendment requests was July 1, 2003. On August 28, 2003, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider 7 Comprehensive Plan requests. The Commission continued the hearing to September 11, 2003, requesting staff to develop an alternative recommendation for CPA-03-05. On October 28, 2003, the Spokane Valley City Council adopted the amendments as recommended by the Planning Commission. The amendments were subsequently appealed to the Eastern Washington Growth Management Hearings Board by the City of Liberty Lake. Liberty Lake did not argue any substantive issues with the amendments; rather, Liberty Lake cited a procedural error where the Spokane Valley failed to notify the Washington State Office of Community Trade and Economic Development (CTED) at least 60 days prior to adoption of the amendments per RCW 36.70A.106. The Hearings Board ruled that Spokane Valley must comply with the procedural requirements of RCW 36.70A.160. The purpose of this Planning Commission hearing is to satisfy the Hearings Board decision and the procedural requirement of RCW 36.70A.160. Notice of the proposed amendments was sent to the CTED on April 8, 2003 via email. A letter confirming receipt of the notice was received by the Spokane Valley Community Development Department on April 12, 2004 (Attachment A). The following describes the proposed amendments: 1. File No. CPA-03-01 Location: 8915 East Montgomery Request: Change 5 acres from Low Density Residential to Regional Commercial Original PC Recommendation: Change to Community Center and zone B-2 City Council Decision: Change to Community Commercial and zone B-2 2. File No. CPA-03-02 Location: South side of Appleway Avenue, east of Park Road Request: Change 3 acres from Neighborhood Commercial to Regional Commercial Original PC Recommendation: Change to Community Commercial and zone B-2 City Council Decision: Change to Community Commercial and zone B-2 3. File No. CPA-03-03 Location: West side of Pines Road, between Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way and Mansfield Avenue Request: Change 2.5 acres from High Density Residential to Light Industrial Original PC Recommendation: Change to Light Industrial and zone 1-2 City Council Decision: Change to Light Industrial and zone 1-2 4. File No. CPA-03-04 Location: Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and north of 1-90 (Golf Dome property) Request: Change 2.6 acres from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial Original PC Recommendation: Change to Light Industrial and zone 1-2 City Council Decision: Change to Light Industrial and zone 1-2 5. File No. CPA-03-05 Location: West of Pines Road between Broadway and Cataldo Avenue Request: Change 3 acres from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential Original PC Recommendation: Change southern portion to Medium Density Residential and zone UR-12; no change on northern portion of parcel. City Council Decision: Change southern portion to Medium Density Residential and zone UR-12; no change on northern portion of parcel. 6. File No. CPA-03-06 Location: North side of Broadway Avenue, between Blake and Mamer Roads Request: Change 5 acres from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential Original PC Recommendation: Change to High Density Residential and zone UR-22 City Council Decision: Change to High Density Residential and zone UR-22 7. File No. CPA-03-07 Location: Northwest corner of Barker Road and Boone Avenue Request: Change 3 acres from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential Original PC Recommendation: Change to west portion of property to Medium Density Residential and zone UR-12; change east portion of property to Community Commercial and zone B-2 City Council Decision: Change to west portion of property to Medium Density Residential and zone UR-12; change east portion of property to Community Commercial and zone B-2 ATTACHMENTS: A. Letter from Office of Community, Trade and Economic Development B. Vicinity maps for each amendment. STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Scott Kuhta, AICP, Long Range Planner STATE,0 spool hreb yy 1889v, areco p, irni STATE OF WASHINGTON APS 1 2 2004 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY, Oft i TRADE Po4 ECONOMIC O MI C D EL O PM E N6 128 10th Box Washington o725-4000 *Mg April 8, 2004 Scott Kuhta Long Range Planner City of Spokane Valley 11707 East Sprague Avenue Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 RE: Submittal of Documents to the Washington State Department of Community, Trade, and Economic Development for City of Spokane Valley Dear Mr. Kuhta: Thank you for sending this department the following: Draft Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Proposed amendments to the Interim Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Received on 04/08/2004. Please keep this letter. It is your record of when the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development(CTED) received this material. We have forwarded a copy of this notice to other state agencies. Adopted development regulations should be sent to CTED immediately upon publication, as well as to any state agencies that commented on the draft regulation. A jurisdiction does not need to send its regulation to the agencies which have been called ahead and that have indicated the local plan will not be reviewed. The jurisdiction should keep a record of this contact with state agencies and the state agencies' response. If you have any questions or concerns, please call me at(360) 725-3068. Sincerely, Dee Caputo Growth Management Planner Growth Management Services Enclosure Comprehensive Pian 1 Land Use Bap r 7,_ -1_ L t 1 Frederick ___i Frederick - ��pe. - ---- I _ . � --7-7.. �a. I Fairview ' L�d rick_ ; 1 O _ Fail e_, IN�;{ I Gr.ce133 4 _ i I T II --ill j � ��� 1 fp c (O — ILL- ,IL , I � Buckeye ✓ i "D. �� i i i g -1r 11 ea l 1 1 _' e �- York m m T i 1i -1111 - LT � L co - Li 1. • _ _ //� 1 ome --- I I. �' - r% site 15 -- _ ° _ _ E 1 I11 Il1 t IA -- ti'_'' 6haillirn5-11111111"4:fri filiffi III_ ISh'annQn 3 11,1111, 7 , , , , (II 111111111 Il ■ iii■ ■ ■■ 1 90 W287 OFF r4.111,__ yo .,gyp 1''1ON Nora ,, I inti Iiiii II 11 111 a `u o �� i 1 r up _ _ I ; Comp Plan Category 1 _ i-- 1, a f )_,: Low DensityResidential 1- (' tl I ---- ( _-� i i s Medium Density Residential ,z--_11:- i L 1__� �rss�on _=________111:171),, _� ; i (-�' i — I --1 J 1 High DensityResidential 1 -T ��1 - I '- l 9 ti i , i III - - -F-ri [ Neighborhood Commercial - i 1 , i - , I 1r- 133 G Community Commercial !-- i _� r i. Ise o ' �i--t__ - '° _ c . L�_-1 RegionalI " T I1--1-1-1l I ' �._�.__ : Mixed Use Commercial ` I IK 1 I . iilat ld-' 'ill I ,1- I -• I — co i 1 i c ,I, Floone: I.- Community Center _i i , I - _ T 1 l 1 �a )Bo#ne _ "' -- -- Urban Activity Center !I 11—i- i__ I Ti L ; 3 - � . __-- 1.- I `N i Ti i Light Industrial I- 1 Heavy Industrial - - l , - + i Mineral Land �, idi, - �-tt, .i, August 15,2003 Comp ehens e PD in Anivandmeon �,�, , ! "' CPA-03-01 5�� 7Vaney 400 _ J Feet Z®rno nI'v�� p ►• V - .1 ._ -- U Frederick Frederick i t .c 1 1 l- -- —� - - -- I _ 1.1'-‘-1--------------- , 1 i _.11111d:—=d- 1 r !I irizi. -1-"-------1W_ 1111 v --�--- 1 1 Iaiui1■ c07o :uckeye __ �'I�I/'''/ -r OUT 111 �� 111 � C WIL11 1 111 111■ 1111 York = .______– -! Ili Ill OMNI coFrallga1111111:11111111 u). I. ...,IjIPlmiI NM Illip IIIII IIIIII t.,.. - i 4A , ,. , , ammo 1: %I Site x!111 IN■ IN 0000 : :1�11i11111'!! , 1 ; -; i ag -ip, cii, gm gin gm r., ,.44,1,..m ovals 3 , -- .,:.: , ,. . IN MI WI Non .. .....r. ,,,... .. Am trams . ,_ 9 ' , r----E-1 .1 iiall.mi um A-mi.. .11.1.1 alai 4:1111111 Wen EWE 1 -,-7----,-- --1, . .. _. , ,.. ''''' ' 1,L L_____, -I -- .. Oill7a171:MO IIIIIMM mug ill1011 Mtn:1111•0 cco,, ••• _ _ • •,• . , • 3 , ,_ r...,__ • „ �r I 41 IIN Mil �� .., .,...., --I tikliik. 9 i0, _� _ i �111N 1111111111■1111R'w q- i „,----.... ..--...-......,,r...„ ......,..,..,_,1111_A�1 �� � 1 1 ■ "Ill - � li � ■■■1 /1 ■1/VIII �1�� � ,I� -- PlAllir I ;--I�- I 1 11111�111�i1 , M_i i III _ice;fi _ • 1111111111101". L��1 - ,1 T UR-7 iiiiWUuIIIRI -1 TIT--1__I UR-22 inwil i■■ ll �i gni 1 NI iT! I _ __:,68.-- ___I ,°- ono ■ 13-2113_3 ! : ill ri 1 1V3 _ -u w - i -- i m I -ILI I-- 1 „_ _ KR.:„.;.1� Go4ne 1-1 I fisi a I rii_ _, ______. _, O. --TIN, T - , _-__t 11:- r 1-3 rnbt L..... a 111 ' — I I:-'./.,/. MZ .1-t_I _ r , u ___ I-1---._11 1 LI 7'1 if%I'd* _i_l ____________•.=.sol___ _.1• - itiolin I 11 August 15,2003 Comprehensive Plea Aneidmnt " 400 CPA-03-01 P Rn a ==' ` Comprehensive Pian Land Use iiiiap o-a 3- IIiill_ 44 - I ; Appleway — — \ ..., _ r_i____,__ tii, , , .. Otit 2nd \� � \ , Site _ _-kG) 3rd L________ l 1 Comp Plan Category Rural Conservation Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential High Density Residential {- _j Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial F_---i Regional Commercial Mixed Use N f_11 1 Community Center 9' Urban Activity Center Light Industrial 3r Heavy Industrial Mineral Land August 15, 2003 Ca € ,, omp hens ve PHan Amendment . y- 400 CPA-03-02 _-----Na lle 7 Feet -- " L , Zordng Map . iiirr... ,..._ ......, . ,--- . . • ... ,.. .. , . . . , , 1 ‘ . __ ......._._; .. •• 1 • . .. ....•.• .„ -. .. ._• .: •- ii.,..- ,_. ... , . T [ ---- ---,-,-- 1 1 1 , 1 1 ._. 1 i 1 __-------- 1 I . .i. _______ ----1----1— r--8---6F-Je -- _____________ ,i- IIIIIII 401$00).* spiewa II ill 1-------r ---:__„-----7, _ _.. 1 1E1111 2nd ilii 1 el ._„___1_11 I ILI ,, T III , , \ - , -- :i_ - Site i_ i ; • _:_____I , I _----- -_______ 1 ____ _ , . -- . , _,----- \ 11 111IN 1111111111111 NM 1T 1 --] .------- -, .-. \ - Zoning Class — : '- ';.''• UR-3.5 II _______ , ; .,. . \ - - • UR-12 I _1_-T-1 ____\ _ -- - ,.. ._. ----, ....;.:: UR-22 I . i • ' 1.I B-1 gth iI[L 1 ri-H-------1--- , B-2 . --1 i 1--- --v-T- 1-2 1-----' 1-3 1 MZ -1-1-- , ir _ 1 11 ill - August 15,2003 Comprehenshre Plan Amendment 400 CPA-03-02 Sitiolthine I Feet --"--T Valley -- _ __ .. . ._ . _ ___ Comprehensive Pia?: Land Use Map ;$1!.' '',' r �f,, r i i ` .Ir,. a Y� ♦ P •rvirrij 7 < ,; ' 'j ...� ir s t 1 f `;� x T ,� t�`1r4 a 1;. ' l l 1,1 I I I i I 3 I ' I I 1,'' i ,11_ I —..._._ _ •1 1 I "4'-,',.s, ti. 1 , I , , ' . , , // u `PI ,,I `/ :------- Site _ ' i _______\______ 1,, -.:_i , - - -1--1 , 1 \ 1 i r11 i ,'T r111;i1an„ Montgomery --1,00100101, 4; r�. 1 9(1 1...---_------0 W 287 I__.�—190 X287-0 Comp Plan Category Low Density Residential _- Medium Density Residential i t71 High Density Residential 1 _ 1 Neighborhood Commercial -iCommunity Commercial ' ru . ® Regional Commercial _ i>yiol� Mixed Use - 14 - - IT 'I , Yh J: Community Center I Urban Activity Center i I I - Malt �; Light Industrial a)iwen__�'_ - !-—. - N I I - : T_______ L-,.-1 Heavy Industrial II i I I.`1 � i 11 I Mineral LandI - - 1I 1 1 ! I . . I I P.li, i August 15,2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment �rr„F Spokane 420 CPA-03-03 — \7211e3T 1 I Feet Zonhlg Map \l i` i 1 - I :,--„ \ w Mans geld — --� Site ... Plv _ ._ .... . I , . ---------____.J ,„,. . -- ----- _ .-...- ___ _____________ __________, --_ Indiana _ Ni -\ 1 Montgomery i T-----------j <19? F I 1 90 L_________________--- 190 W287 n 190 ., - 10 0 Zoning Class \- /, L UR-3.5 7 ILIA UR-7 ---- . I UR-12 P . .\ . UR-22 IIIL----- c= 1 [ _ JB1 B-2 - N MN B-3 1 ... '. - --J __ 1-1 IIII! -- I-2 V _ ME 1-3 1 -I M. . ‘ , .. 1 . I I o Sin o August 15,2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendmen : .. 400 CPAm03-O3 taane I I Feet - )Val le�� Comprehensive Pian Land Use Map � _ , 1 co 'I r. Girard �!/ 4_ Sharp' Sharp !I � , ( I i, 1 ' ___- Done— J i- - i . _l__ _ -S ____—. Sitej/. __ , 9,- __I ._ ____I cif ____\ „,, - - Demet __L__, 110 t-:--- 1--77 V./141 - ( I Foad 1 1` II ? I// - o (--Mallon . I __ iiL 9 � — Comp Plan Category Low Density Residentialr` f-/ I Medium Density Residential ) • .- -,� rerl High Density Residential //oi. .--/ 1 Neighborhood Commercial : Community Commercial - ® Regional Commercial L______ Mixed Use iI `! , 1 ^i Community Center N 1 L71 Urban Activity Center Light Industrial I Heavy Industrial I l Mineral Land j --_\ ' August 15,2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment « ex 400 CPA-0 �®4 Sp ®lire 1 I Feet �a��e�' ✓! _1 orong Map v I binto} Sin to to ID— — �: �/ ��_ Fd / t i i / I \LStJarp ` \ rp\ J a - I 1\t \ ill- Loone- I L - • i'y 1.1.r V . ., , ill ' , ._ ...41 i i ; 0 i /' __''_____,.:_l' I—/ LI 6 / 9 - - 1, t:Ido , , ,,,),L, 0 ,,,_ \ i o r4-- � r _. -- -Dean . , _ .... f� \\ \ i ---- II — —Mallon 1 ----7) , 43121 \cP AN I III — i :adw: Zoning Class L 1 UR-3.5 I 1 UR-7 _,.. rii,77///////// UR-12 ga°51- UR-22 ,•R-22 g0 E286OFF • B-2 _ 1 B-3 wa 1-1 I� - -- 1-2 I3 / 77--- t„ /. , ' i August 15, 2003Comprehensive Plan Amendment Sci400 CPA-03-04 @orf d ley I IFeet ` 4 Cmnprehensive Plan Land Use Map . . .._ __ - , . i I Ico- -1--- ---- H . I -- -- i ---- 1 I 1 1 1 I ' --I J k._ _ Cataldoi - -1 -T, ig i I 1 I 1 V I S i t e •-Ii v/---/Z// \ 1 . , 1 I I • / --- r-- ''.; 1 1 -11_ -- 1 _ _ I I________ way 4 I -- - - _ -- 1 t ,... 1 - 1 _ 1 1 i \ j , 1 1'1'1 t- 1 1 , 1 , , Comp Plan Category 1 i 1 i Low Density Residential -----E Med iurn Density Residential - T - , . i rrjE0 High Density Residential 1 I 1 _] Neighborhood Commercial - _ __I * i Community Commercial i 1 i 1 EMI Regional Commercial \ 1 , Mixed Use 1 , I 1 Alt,v; Community Center 11 + I Urban Activity Center 1 1 i . Light Industrial Heavy Industrial _ ___ I (---- ' ' l' I , - i 1 ' \ Mineral Land ,.., , F.-, - ! I 1 I 1 I 1 1 - - ---- August 15, 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Feet *OR:me 400 CPA-03-05 <'3 VP lie- - ' J' LZonhig [Map ____...,, ___ _ _ 1 _ ___ '-------- ___ ___ __ E , i] . ., . . . ..•...,. . : : .. , CD # 1 1/7/ , iii 'g _-- , Site -C 1 ._ 11111i : .adwa, , ____, ill. i; i__________] — Zoning Class F 1 1 UR-3.5 - U R-7 UR-12 I[ .. . UR-22 illOlive I L B-1 _ - -- B-2 — \1--- 11.1 B-3 I________ ---- 1-1 ---- - 1-1 I 1-2 1 — L.-VII al--- L _ _ -,. i%/. MZI Tommil I 4 __ _ , ., ... .. ..,.. , . . ,. - August 15, 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 400 CPA-03-05 _,.. I (Feet " C .mprehe�lsve Paan [ _Lad Use ���dap I Catald -_,-___r-- - ? I - - Cataido I II --- I 1 i . i _ - -- / II Mallin i i1 .i/i Malian- ; site �_-- , /// �---- 9 ) TT-I ';i! \ , , , ___:_ ___, ,. J , d .40 1 _____:±. , 1 --- THI —1 i __ ______,I \ i, 1 \ k �---- `_i_______,,, r_1,!,_ �-- �Sprin�fielc:_. _______ 1 I i ,I - I f 11I l� — y r i '\---- ' Comp Plan Category , Alki t----1 ___ __ ----I — Low Density Residential i1111 I Medium Density Residential t--- --r- _--_i High Density Residential I ! ' I Neighborhood Commercial I --\ __ -.:1 [ ] 9 Community Commercial _—� 1 I:. Regional Commercial j i ! I Mixed Use ---- ! I ------ � v�r��ywny i N CommunityCenter ' 1 i j I! i. I _ I i 1 Ii [__._ Urban Activity Center j II I I - s- .-..I rp Light Industrial --J��` �I - Imo. j. _ I T Heavy Industrial ,I. i ' Nirur Mineral Land II m - III I ll I i I August 15, 2003 Comprehensive :� rehensive Plan Amendment � � 400 CPAmO3-O 11e3,7 I I Feet Zonhlg Map i ___ ._\,_ ata I • _t_, 1 Gataldo-- -- I T Mallon „. ..,/,. ..400A, „ Ell I All Site / � �� - - - _____ ,iimi • 0 01 - e.n ay— - :rine iel JZoning Class -- -- - L-- _1 UR-3.5 Fd —] UR-7 , — .______ 111, _ UR-12 -— U R-22 L - 1 B-1 \ ...1 _—________ B-2 B-3 - - --1 p- T-1_ 1-1 ( _ L _ _ 1-2 ____. .._______ \__ -- j I I I 3 1 _ i__ MZ • - . Nixon— __ August 15, 2003 Comprehensive Plan A. ; ledmerr „ � ,� �6 �ne 400 CPA-03®®G IFeet - 'Valley ley .., Comprehensive Plan L . . • Land Use Map -- si to ,- _ it � I i I I I { i I ! Fit I _______I -— - :I_ __ _ -- _ __ _ . 'i I_ t_ _�_ _ sere I� L. a, _o Frr .. ,,,,,, ___:,,..::,,, _ _____ _ i 2, ------ — \ ._ Boone Boone � wi. — 1- m j -- !eS ' -- 111 190 E293 ON r ,› __ ______ O ,\\ ___ - 0, o- _—_ o zy m ------A -------:----- ( to 190 W293 OFF 190 190 W293O — 190 Comp PLan Category __ /90 93ON Low Density Residential E293 oFF ‘_913_,r- r-- Medium Density Residential ``� �` + High Density Residential __ _-_ ___.___._._.__ L______] Neighborhood Commercial _r�ad"`a?`"-- —" - \ . _ '," I Community Commercial __— IIIII Regional Commercial 1 _-_ I ; Mixed Use - - � I I omp Community Center �( INE Urban Activity Center Light Industrial II I . _f_. • { • Heavy Industrial I I I Mineral Land — I _ A►ki .—. .—-- August 15,2003 Comprehensive Plan AmendmentR„,. `-=-� 400 CPA-03-07 S iokane 1 I Feet J Valley Zorii n2 Map _--II — Imo- : , _ - ==ama {I I____H— G ,7Ive ----°1-- F. f f7-----Gr \____ �1 — — ' Site • —� -- -�, Boone Boone �� 190 E293 ON 11111"111111 \-- gli00-1-- O d�iq 0 L_ CO m F SR MIN _ 190 W293 OFF 190 190 W293 ON 1 90 -- g3 -- 190 E293 OFF 90 ON '- ' -_� U R-3.5 ' i UR-7 • rIlbt\-1i UR-12 : ''' '. — 111 U R-22 - [- B-1 ----- -- B-2 ES B-3 N -1 --- -_ Grove - 1-2 . - 1 1 I i ___1_ _i____q 7/ __I 7 MZ — __ , 1. �- r August 15, 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment CUT tV �ft CPA-03-07 Spokane 400 Valley I I Feet CHAPTER 6 — PRIVATE UTILITIES 6.0 Introduction This element satisfies the Growth Management Act (GMA) requirement that cities prepare a Private Utilities element. This element describes the location of existing utilities and the proposed location of new utilities, as well as the capacity of existing and proposed utilities. The GMA requires the Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan (SVCP) have internal consistency. This means that the Private Utilities element must be fully coordinated with other appropriate elements of the SVCP. In accordance with WAC 365-195-320(2)(c), this Private Utilities element includes plans for natural gas, electricity, telecommunications, and cable television service for the City and surrounding urban growth area (UGA). Each utility plan will describe and analyze existing and proposed utility systems within Spokane Valley and improvements necessary to meet growing consumer demand. In most cases, maps and other graphics are provided to illustrate the existing system and proposed improvements. Plans for water supply and sewer are found in the Capital Facilities element of the SVCP. The City sees the GMA requirement to prepare a Private Utilities element as an opportunity to identify ways of improving the quality of services provided within the City. The City will use this element to identify priorities and develop implementation strategies to ensure that provision of utilities is properly coordinated with land use. The City acknowledges that it would not have been possible to prepare this element without the assistance of local utility providers. 6.1 Planning Context Privately owned electrical, natural gas, and line telephone utilities are regulated by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission (WUTC). Wireless telephone communication companies are licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Cable television companies are regulated by the FCC and the Communications Acts of 1934 and 1996. Private utilities must have a franchise agreement to place utilities in the public right-of-way. Franchise agreements give each utility the non- exclusive right to provide its category of service within the City. 6.2 Countywide Planning Policies Developing the Countywide Planning Policies (CWPP's) was coordinated by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials. The following are the CWPP's relevant to private utilities: Policy Topic 3— Promotion of Contiguous and Orderly Development and Provision of Urban Services Policy 11: SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES The Steering Committee shall oversee the preparation of a regional utility corridor plan for incorporation into local comprehensive plans that include the following elements: a. Protection of existing and designation of future regional corridors. b. Dimensional guidelines for regional corridors. c. Provision for multiuse corridors for compatible utilities. d. Measures to mitigate impacts on adjacent areas. e. Land uses which are appropriate on or adjacent to corridors. f. Vegetation clearance guidelines for electrical transmission and distribution lines in order to reduce fire hazard. Note: The Spokane County Regional Utility Technical Committee prepared a Regional Utility Corridor Plan that was adopted by the Spokane County Steering Committee of Elected Officials on December 15, 1995. Policy 18: Each jurisdiction in its comprehensive plan should provide policies that support the compatible incorporation of utilities, greenbelts and open space within common corridors. Policy 19: Each jurisdiction shall review environmental and health issues regarding regional utility corridors sited within its boundaries for use in the decision making process by respective agencies. Policy 20: Each jurisdiction shall plan for growth within urban growth areas (UGA) which uses land efficiently, adds certainty to capital facilities planning and allows timely and coordinated extension of urban government services, public facilities and utilities for new development. Each jurisdiction shall identify intermediate growth areas (6-to 10-year increments) within its UGA or establish policies which direct growth consistent with land use and capital facilities plans. 6.3 Electricity Utilities '% = «GENo 6.3.1 Bonneville Power ; ' o Administration - � Monona �.�... \. A..c. Washington • � ....- The Bonneville Power t ' r ' ' Administration (BPA) was established in 1937 and is a federal agency under the U.S. -y Department of Energy that • 3a �Oan 74 markets wholesale electrical .1• ...,,.:. power. BPA operates and CaMornia 1Nevada - Utah • , markets electrical transmission services in the Pacific Northwest. Figure 1 -BPA's Transmission System & Federal Dams SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES The power that is marked by BPA is generated at 31 federal hydro-electric projects, one non-federal nuclear plan and several other non-federal power plants. In addition to the power generating plants, BPA manages 15,397 circuit miles of transmission lines and owns 284 substations. BPA operates a 500 kV line just north of the existing city limits in portions of the Spokane County urban growth area (UGA). Additionally, BPA operates two substations and 115kV transmission lines within the City of Spokane Valley. The hydro-electric projects and the electrical system are known as the Federal Columbia River Power System. About 45 percent of the electric power used in the Northwest comes from BPA. BPA's transmission system accounts for approximately 75 percent of the regions high-voltage grid and includes major transmission links with other regions. BPA is a self-funding agency, which pays for its costs through power and transmission sales. BPA's customers include publicly owned and investor-owned utilities, as well as some large industries. BPA also sells or exchanges power with utilities in Canada and the western United States. 6.3.2 Avista Utilities - Description of Utility t� p„do„ h..�4 rm► _AMM .: f Avista Utilities' primary market area is ,f,,. eastern Washington and northern Idaho. .Gtraha kyr Avista serves nearly 310,000 electric ,�ho,Chrik ^ customers in their market area and is the Aw L Aph principal electricity provider in the City of , •spacaee fa(N1 R,I,, Spokane Valley. rP w .Cuvr d':Urre A (av�A4-�� �fwrlA4r Rnrr Avista owns and operates eight �► hydroelectric plants on the Clark Fork and Spokane Rivers. These hydroelectric facilities produce about 60 percent of the Figure 2-Avista Hydro Facilities total electrical energy used by Avista customers. Avista also owns and operates coal, gas, and wood-waste combustion plants in five Washington, northern Idaho and eastern Montana locations. Avista has a number of substation facilities and 115 kV (Kilovolt) transmission lines in the City of Spokane Valley. Map UT-1 indicates those facility locations and describes that portion of Avista's transmission system that .-71, covers Spokane Valley. It is a grid that provides a link '' 116 41, between BPA bulk transmission 4 system and the local distribution system that connects with customers. Figure 3-Hydro Electric Process The "Bulk Transmission System" is SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES operated by BPA, which operates a region wide, interconnecting, transmission system that supplies electric power to utilities from federal hydroelectric projects east and west of the Cascades. The primary service BPA provides to Avista and other electricity utilities is wheeling electrical energy throughout the region. A majority of the transmission lines supplying Spokane Valley are energized at 115kV. There is an existing Avista 230kV line that cuts across the north eastern portion of the City in the Barker Road area. These lines supply power into the Spokane Valley distribution system and provide connections to other providers of electricity in Spokane Valley. Power is transferred from the transmission system to Spokane Valley's local distribution system at six distribution substations. The following substations are located within Spokane Valley: Boulder Park, Barker Road, S.I.P., Opportunity, Chester, and 9th & Central. 6.3.3 Vera Water& Power— Description of Utility Vera Water and Power is a publicly owned utility that supplies water and electricity to the Veradale area in the City of Spokane Valley. Vera operates 3 substations in Spokane Valley including: Valleyway located on Valleyway, east of McDonald Road; Sullivan, located on the northeast corner of Sullivan Road and Valleyway; and Vera located on the northwest corner of Sullivan Road and 38th Avenue. Vera plans a new substation (Central Valley) on the southwest corner of Sullivan Road and 16th Avenue slated to be constructed in approximately 2006. Vera purchases 100% of its power from the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) and is then distributed to its customers through an underground and overhead electrical distribution system. Vera takes delivery of power from BPA at the three local substations indicated above. Vera serves over 8,700 electric customers in the City of Spokane Valley. 6.3.4 Modern Electric Water Company— Description of Utility Modern Electric began operations in the Spokane in 1905 as part of the development of the Valley by the Modern Irrigation and Land Company. Modern Electric provides water and electricity to approximately 10,000 households in Spokane Valley. Modern's electrical supply system consists of 3 FERRY „Po . ORE `"�°° substations including the Locust station, located southJont"'�- "` of Interstate 90 on the west side of Locust Street; —.L., Nelson station, located south of 4th Avenue east of Pau Fac ° �°�aE p 71 Walnut; and the Opportunity station located at Abdal fake" ffi "F"'"" ^' tea' FW b�� Modern's main office site on Pines Road, north of °'"` ;mss ° �.. °R Broadway. w o°r. , . T4° )- • 9. FmJry 1Ftln um° IYvu[° OMr s"" °GYfW 6.3.5 Inland Power& Light— Description of Utility ° R.,, ."` Inland Power& Light (IP&L) was started in 1937 providing electrical service to some 160 farms and Figure 4-Inland Power& homes northeast of Spokane. IP&L's now serves Light Service Area electrical customers in 13 counties in eastern Washington and northern Idaho. IP&L's customer base has grown to over 33,000 SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES customers with a relatively small number located in the southern portion of the City of Spokane Valley. 6.4 Natural Gas Utilities 6.4.1 Avista Utilities— Description of Utility The north operating division of Avista Utilities provides natural gas to more than 174,000 customers primarily in • — ,: eastern Washington and northern Idaho. i.;„ ;" ' The Spokane area is the largest rz'Tu ,' „ ^NCH ; .�. =7 �• metropolitan region served by Avista �� ����' ^�^ �-.- with a population of over 350,000. r14'3 �'r' • 'z i ' Avista is advantageously located on two • ~' wY r•'irnl^!ntin......-... .i tl1.w.1 f•T91t'YfY ,'.I•.1q 1�f. interstate natural gas pipelines. r • -u� o;;,,n; �p ;;,a; Williams Pipeline—West, (still referred _��• :� �.�. . �, ,t ^••^ to as Northwest Pipeline Corporation— NWP), provides both firm and interruptible natural gas transportation Figure 5-Natural Gas Supply System service to access both British Columbia and domestic Rocky Mountain gas. Pacific Gas & Electric Transmission — Northwest (PG&E GT-NW) provides both firm and interruptible transportation to access Alberta natural gas. The north operating division consists of approximately 3,000 miles of gas distribution mains, through which it delivers annual volumes of just fewer than 350 million therms. This gas is received at more than 40 points along the interstate pipelines and distributed to Avista's residential, commercial and industrial customers. Avista is unable at this point in time identify how many customers are located within the new corporate limits Spokane Valley. As that information becomes available it will be included in a future update to this plan. Gas Supply Mains:These are generally larger diameter (six-inch steel and larger) mains designed to operate at higher pressure (100 psig to 250 psig) to deliver natural gas from the supply source to pressure reducing stations. Pressure Reducing (District Regulators) Stations:These are located at various locations throughout the system to reduce supply main pressure to a standard distribution operating pressure of approximately 60 psig. Distribution Mains: Distribution mains are fed from District Regulators. These are typically 8, 6, 4, 2 and 1.25 inch in diameter. The pipe material is typically polyethylene (PE). 6.5 Telecommunications Utilities The telecommunications section focuses on wire telephone, wireless communications, Internet service, and cable television. Telecommunications is not only important for SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES voice transmission, but also provides the infrastructure for the transmission of images and electronic data. In Spokane Valley, Qwest Communications provides local wire telephone service, wireless telephone service, and Internet connection. A number of other wireless communications providers operate networks in Spokane Valley as well. Comcast provides cable television services and Internet connection to Spokane Valley residents. The telephone (both wireless and wired) portions of the telecommunications industry are extremely competitive and for that reason, the City had difficulty obtaining detailed information about operations and plans. As a result, the section of the plan addressing telephone services; 1) reflects the City's commitment to allowing for the provision of advanced telecommunications services; 2) provides a general description of how the existing system works; and 3) describes the process for improving service delivery. 6.5.1 Telephone System (wired) Existing Facilities and Operations—Qwest Communication, Inc. provides telecommunication service to the Spokane Valley planning area as regulated by WUTC. A local exchange area is served by a central office (CO), which contains various kinds of switching equipment. From a CO, there are typically four main cable routes extending relatively north, south, east, and west. From each main cable route there are branch distribution routes. These facilities may be aerial or buried, copper or fiber. Extending from the branch distribution routes are local lines that can be used for voice or data transmission by subscribers. Proposed Improvements—Qwest is required by law to provide adequate telecommunications services on demand. Accordingly, Qwest will provide facilities to accommodate whatever growth pattern occurs within the City. Due to advances in technology, additional capacity is easily and quickly added to the system. 6.5.2 Telephone System (wireless) Existing Systems—The City of Spokane Valley is currently served with a number of wireless communication service providers. Wireless communication is becoming increasingly I important in the 1:_.a' r� .'nuy p telecommunications world. It is a combination of a portion of the radio • I ;irai frequency spectrum with switching • :neer *F.,Ih► technology, making it possible to provide 'plena•Ha1dE- mobile or portable telephone service to j+,rsry Hein•:•=1:4, MAua�t! ...ELI Oral virtually any number of subscribers within a ;�f:'= X31" - cif>r - `�� a ■ 'ri �K- 1_ given area. .1-i11:1 Transmission quality is comparable to that rr� provided by conventional wire line ' " `� telephones, and the same dialing capabilities and features available to wire Figure 6-Qwest Wireless Coverage line users are available to cellular users. Area The wireless/cellular communications sector SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 6 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES of the economy is growing rapidly. Wireless or personal communication 'ale services (PCS) works by splitting a region Deer Park Athol into smaller geographic areas called cells that are each served by a transmitter and Spokane Cour d'Alen receiver or"base station." As a caller moves across the landscape, the call is passed or"handed-off'from one base station to another. Each base station is connected to a mobile telephone switching Figure 7-Sprint Wireless office, which is linked to the land based Coverage Area phone network serving the home or office. Individual base station site locations, such as the proposed site, are selected based on a number of considerations related to topography, distance from other base stations, proximity to traffic corridors, and other technical features. Wireless engineers utilize computer modeling and radio testing to determine potential sites. Because PCS base stations consist of very low powered transmitters, which l cover a relatively small geographic area, there is limited flexibility in site selection. PCS site coverage radius is typically one-half to three miles and is affected •• by the topography and vegetation of the area, the radio frequency engineers Figure 7-Cricket Wireless Coverage must design and optimize cell site heights and locations within the PCS network to enable sufficient overlap between cells to provide continuous coverage. Staff has identified the major P t wireless providers in the SpokaneCoeur i Valley area. The following __ r, ..• additional maps and graphics ) �„11 rE j '`i E? t�t' indicate the individual wireless service areas. Stn Information regarding current and : , future predicted number of subscribers is considered by the Figure 8-Verizon Wireless Coverage Area purveyors to be proprietary, and no data were furnished in this Local DigitatChoice'' All-Digital Coverage Area regard. However, given the increasing number of wireless nEl Local DigitalChoice`•"Covorago Area subscribers and the introduction of ❑ Limited Coverage Availability hand sets that access the Internet, send text messages and other information and data features. SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES Forecasting for new cellular facilities uses a relatively narrow time frame offphi" 4; A.typically two years. Expansion of the t p;h k� wireless system is demand driven; - 3 "3an.• [ therefore wireless providers must maintain a short response time and a _ ,,,,. . . , tight planning horizon. Future cell sites , • . . . "0 ,---:. `� are considered proprietary information • _ by the wireless companies and are not rr�' shared for purposes of local comprehensive planning. -.10_0-lieu 'i $ uIIma son::(.;r:•rrt- , • L Priest . H.. Athol Figure 9 -T-Mobile Coverage Area Post Falls i Cour Spokane ' i4ci N.Ir,n; f e Opportunity i 1 • Figure 10 -Nextel Wireless _:::Y f..°'21':.it l I 1 9 Coverage Area C . I• I :.ilioiAi `ter Figure 11 -AT&T Wireless Coverage Area Spokane Li AIene • a • a Opport.inity "'~ ' C h.on.:y - Service Area Voice usage in this area will be applied to any p. ...L'io I D included minutes jr your plan. Where available, data usage in this area '.pill be applied to any i OPDX• megabytes in your plan. All next Generation Pu II mane features iNill be available. Figure 12 - Cingular Coverage Area SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 8 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES 6.5.3 Internet Service Internet service is presently provided by telephone, cable, and satellite. Qwest provides Internet service via telephone lines and Comcast provides Internet service via cable. In addition, as streets are constructed or reconstructed, conduits to assist in the installation of fiber optic communication systems should be included as part of the road project. 6.5.4 Cable Television On November 18, 2002, Comcast and AT&T Broadband merged to form the new Comcast Corporation. Comcast Corporation, which is headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania is the largest U.S. cable company serving more than 21 million customers in 41 states, as of 2003. The illustration below is a general description of the components of the cable TV(CATV) system and shows supply from source to customer. One of the primary components of a cable system is the headend siteCan electronic control center where the information signal is processed for distribution through the cable system. The signal can be received either off a hard line (cable), satellite dish, microwave antennas, and/or TV antenna. Main trunk cable lines (coax and fiber) distributing signals throughout Spokane Valley. Feeder cables branch from the IF main trunk cables to distribute the signals -_ to neighborhood areas. From there, - I ro.<..• individual connections are made to the -__J\ I. customer's service entry. P provide attempts to service to all 7 t-� .... ;7 •_ti==`fi - �., • residents within its franchise areas I,II h:[ngn�--= Factors considered in extending service are overall technical integrity, economical - feasibility, and franchise requirements. Figure 13 -Cable Television Schematic Cable television installations are made to new subscribers (either to new dwelling units or, to a much smaller degree, to residences who have not opted for cable before) at published rates provided they are less than 150 feet from a distribution or feeder line. Connections requiring longer runs are charged on a time and material basis. Most public work considerations, such as tree trimming, work in the right-of-way, restoration of property, and so on, are covered in the City's Franchise Agreement. Comcast now offers digital service (includes internet access)to Spokane Valley customers. Comcast has also begun replacing existing copper cable trunk lines with fiber optic, which can be configured to carry video or data transmission signals. SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES 6.6 Priorities and Strategies The Private Utilities element provides an opportunity for the City to assist utility companies in delivering efficient service to customers and to seek to reduce potential negative impacts on the natural and built environments. This section builds upon system descriptions to identify issues and sets forth policies to coordinate the provision of utilities with City planning. The GMA requires that the utilities element include the general location, proposed location and capacity of all existing and proposed utilities. This has resulted in cities and counties becoming more actively involved in the way in which utilities are sited and provided. In order to protect both citizens and utility customers, the City will work in accordance with the following priorities and strategies: Priorities PUP-1 Work with private utility companies to allow them to provide service in a way that balances cost-effectiveness with environmental protection, aesthetic impact, public safety, and public health. PUP-2 Process permits for private utility facilities in an efficient and timely manner, in accordance with franchise agreements, development regulations, the SVCP, and adopted codes. PUP-3 Ensure that development regulations are consistent with public service obligations imposed upon private utilities by federal and state law. Implementation Strategies PUI-1 The City's right-of-way permitting process should not unnecessarily delay the expansion or improvement of the utility network. PUI-2 The City will, when possible, coordinate with other jurisdictions on proposed utility improvements that impact a multi jurisdictional area. PUI-3 The City encourages the joint use of trenches, conduits, or poles, so that utilities may coordinate expansion, maintenance, and upgrading facilities with the least amount of right-of-way disruption. PUI-4 The City encourages utilities to inform one another of plans to expand or improve utility services. PUI-5 The City will attempt to inform utilities of upcoming improvements or expansions that may provide opportunities for joint use. PUI-6 The City will make an effort to notify utilities of proposed plans to make highway or right-of-way improvements. SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 0 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES PUI-7 The City will encourage and work with telecommunication and cable companies to develop fiber optic cable networks and to increase interconnectivity between different networks. PUI-8 The City shall continue to monitor research into the health effects of Electro-Magnetic Fields (EMF) and microwaves. The City will take appropriate action once definitive conclusions about health implications are reached. PUI-9 To the maximum extent possible and based upon applicable regulations, the City should require the under grounding of utility distribution lines in new subdivisions, new construction, and significantly reconstructed facilities, consistent with all applicable laws. PUI-10To the maximum extent possible and based upon applicable regulations, the City should work with the utilities in preparing a plan for under grounding utilities in areas where their visual impact is critical to improving the appearance of the City, such as the City Center and along Sprague Avenue. PUI-11 The City should, to the extent practical, work with utility providers in preparing a right-of-way vegetation plan that ensures that the needs of landscaping and screening are balanced with the need to prevent power outages. PUI-12 The City should require that site-specific utility facilities such as antennas and substations be reasonably and appropriately sited and screened to mitigate adverse aesthetic impacts. PUI-13 Through its development regulations, the City shall continue to address the siting, screening, and design standards for wireless/cellular facilities, substations, and antenna facilities in such a manner as to allow for reasonable and predictable review while minimizing potential land use and visual impacts on adjacent property. PUI-14 The City should encourage utility providers to base extension and sizing of systems on the Land Use Plan in order to adequately serve anticipated growth. PUI-15 The City should encourage utilities to provide them with their utility service plans to allow better integration with other utilities and City plans. PUI-16 The City and utilities should be encouraged to develop an integrated Geographic Information System (GIS) to better serve mutual needs and those of the public. PUI-17 Incorporate by reference the Policies and Actions identified in the 1995 Regional Utility Corridor Plan as adopted or hereafter amended. 6.7 Environmental Analysis 6.7.1 Impacts of the Alternatives SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 11 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES Implementation Strategy PUI-14 states that utilities should base extension and sizing of systems on the adopted Land Use Plan in order to adequately serve anticipated growth. Supporting Priorities and implementation strategies for all utilities identified in this chapter are included that generally address the need for the City of Spokane Valley to coordinate, on an on-going basis, with all the utility providers within the city. Under the three land use alternatives examined for planning purposes; Modified Existing Conditions, Urban Activity Centers, and City Center Emphasis, all would concentrate growth in the urban area of the city. The Urban Activity Centers and City Center Emphasis alternatives would likely result in a more compact development pattern than under the Modified Existing Conditions alternative. Typically, the more compact the development, the more efficiently distribution of utilities can occur particularly those requiring wires, optic cables or fiber lines. These alternatives my result in somewhat less energy usage that a more dispersed developed patterns. 6.7.2 Mitigation and Implementation Measures 1. Promote conservation measures through enforcement of energy codes and incentives to exceed the energy code, exceed fuel efficiency and emission standards for publicly-owned vehicles and work with utilities to seek innovative conservation measures in public buildings. 2. Provide for interjurisdictional coordination to ensure that utilities are sized, located and phased in a manner that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 6.7.3 Unavoidable Adverse Impacts Future growth and development under any of the land use scenarios would generate increased demand for electrical, natural gas, telecommunications and cable services. Resources will have to be expended to meet these needs; regional costs of providing service will likely increase. SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12 CHAPTER 6-UTILITIES px,„. Land Use Consulting Services 9101 N. Mt. View Lane Spokane, WA 99218 509-467-0112 (0) 509-435-3108 (C) 509-467-0229 (F) 5-27-04 Spokane Valley Planning Commission 11707 E. Sprague Avenue Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA 99206 Ref: Reconsideration CPA-03-07 Chairman William Gothmann, et al: The applicant in the above referenced matter have retained my services to represent their interest in securing the HDR and Community Commercial designations on the subject properties commonly known as the HYCO Mart and Wendy's Fast Food at Barker and Boone in Greenacres. I have reviewed the application as submitted, the staff recommendation and the minutes of your previous meeting and respectfully request that the Planning Commission reconsider their previous decision wherein you limit the westerly portion to MDR and UR-12 zoning. In all due respect, I believe that there is more issues to consider before concurring with the staff's recommendation to limit the intensity of the use to MDR. My findings are as follows: 1) The subject property was previously an industrial land use commonly known as the Quicki Box Co. It included the Burlington Northern railway track along Boone Avenue and co-existed against the same residential setting found there today. It employed 150 people on two shifts and had a rail siding shipping and receiving twice a day, 5 days a week. 2) The present commercial use was established upon removal and clean-up of that manufacturing use and an extended period of vacancy from 1988 until 1999. 3) The area does not contain any HDR designations and yet the site is served with all utilities and services normally expected of an urban environment. 4) The site is served by an extraordinary wide road system of Boone Avenue and can be accessed without penetration of the surrounding residential streets. (Nothing like the previous use with rail service interrupting the residential neighborhood as stated above. 5) The site's size and configuration only allows approximately 30 units to be built and the site plan submitted, illustrates a transitional reduction of units from east to west against the existing low-density areas. 6) If bulk and scale against the single-family neighborhood is a concern,then one needs to acknowledge the long term co-existence of a factory with rail service that used to be their neighbor. Granted, it is gone, but they did survive and homes were purchased against the reality of the factories presence. Query, were bulk, scale and land use adverse to their investments then? Should 30 units in an HDR be considered adverse in-lieu-of what they had? 7) What about the obligation of Growth Management to make better use of the land where services are available? Should we ignore the proximity to the freeway and the lack of traffic impact for an HDR use? Does HDR get any better in terms of non-impacts? 8) What about the HDR implementation with UR-22 zoning as a dual option of medical office or-housing pr both? Should we preclude convenient medical services by limiting the zone to MDR/UR-12? Conclusion: The proposed HDR designation provides more potential services than MDR without impacting the neighborhood in any manner that the neighborhood was accustomed to. Truly, the residential neighborhood's survival against manufacturing and rail service within its midst, is evidence that it will survive with an HDR designation, and perhaps better should medical service become the option in-lieu-of housing. We therefore respectfully request that the Planning Commission find these additional facts sufficient to support the original request and thus revise their recommendations accordin:ly. incerely, / / / 411 t J. Hume Land Use Planning Services Copies: Marina Sukup, AICP Greg McCormick, AICP Scott Kuhta, AICP John Tonani John T. Peterson • . 'Y . v'_ • + „gr , ; •ji �- ~ '`.1_.'-' 'It. •''''''” 7-: it w 4 11" m • ay • .• � • y. ' 6•} ty � k__,. .„-.....„,,......7.,,,,c � _, t GQ •.`-1 ] �r ; � y • ^ - F a:. -r. • a...,,,r t {�a � » .� iy , „ -41-i 1 f , . ••.° .-•, it, , pe f . , , ' r, " - , -,,:i•",. ,„,,, li• ,,,.,z.• 4‘. ,......•,• { 7 31 i } 4 •{,,. P • J1 d ' y ? " is- • 4 . :-T, _ :T ; 6. .�^ tr '. t ,• I :,64 Z'' ^-. �.•tR �e .4- '- :7w opt_ ,i � ;.- ice.... r 2r* ,...+c. .,rr �°.s ff. 's..i a si ,t 1 ;f • .1• t. • -^47 -•" .rte �Y '• 4 �, I .n �' Y�.R'•. ..F mi. • t . -- It I ,- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing Planning Commission - Public Comment May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 ime (Please Print): 67415"e f"e Ab qi , i' o l 7` _7 Name (Please Print):�.Jz=" S�bY 'dress: 1/70 8 4: Cf.711 /c7) Address: ti ' 1104 f2.2 jenda Item: C pfd- 02" C- - Subject: 7A• 7 O£ ❑ For Proposal [Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral 723 ' 00 Wish to Speak: IS Yes ❑ No Wish to Speak: )Yes ❑ No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Comment Planning Commission - Public Hearing MayMay 27, 2004 27, 2004 Name (Please Print): -A) tv� Name (Please Print): ,�"JLf�ED CP, Address: , j eaie),A,4-7-4_01/2-t:A__. ��/ ,� Address: SozO eD•v i aeni e Subject: 7, C P/ -0 3- d 2 Agenda Item: e�z ❑ For Proposal Opposed to Proposal 52 3`; ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: El Yes ❑ No Wish to Speak: / Yes 0 No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing Planning Commission - Public Hearing May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 Name (Please Print : iC h` LLJ_S /14n---S-S-. Name (Please Print): a q -'c), A3,157 l2 yci Address: /7L22 Z C3/ �� Address: /© /? /-o R I � � Agenda Item: C P/ -- 0 3 -a5- Agenda Item: ❑ For Proposal ❑ For Proposal rlyt Opposed to 0-Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral El Neutral Wish to Speak: N Yes ❑ No Wish to Speak: AYes 0 No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY i CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing i Planning Commission - Public Hearing May 27, 2004 I May 27, 2004 Name (Please Print): Y} 1 M4 14l /0 hen / !/ © SS r : 31 10 K Name (Please Print): N Address: /U• f Do f r r ,j'1-e__ Address: 11 f a �� 'c9 o�'e f Agenda Item: BPR---6 3-0� Agenda Item: �� "" v ❑ For Proposal El For Proposal Opposed to Proposal ue-2 7. Opposed to Proposa ❑ Neutral ❑ Neutral CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing Planning Commission - Public Comment May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 fps X12,7 Mame (Please Print): ,- $DEL REL ,.� 4-114 Name (Please Print): 4-114ft Y Address: V, ( 0 \ P_ •r' tt61)e Pip Address: /"a f . r`--e /' r Agenda Item: AIP • °/ 0 ,j 0 Subject: 5 El For Proposal n Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes p3i No Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes tr No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY _ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Co ent �� `�� Planning Commission - Public Hearing May 27, 2004 l May 27, 2004 fiVi Ney 5LeITL'. Print):i! 1 / Name Please Name (Please Print): ( ) ,5/9- A'1 AP A ({--- _,-,/-Liie/ Address: U l a- A4 I �/ 1 C b�l� Kd4.z. ,,, ,A r Address: / 0 1 /6//, Subject: 0 ° (-) 0 - Agenda Item: C P14 Q 3 G �� ❑ For Proposal Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: Yes 0 No Wish to Speak: CI Yes No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing Planning Commission - Public C ,nt May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 ( �0' `� ��? Name (Please Print): C�� Id►��JJ� Name (Please Print): Z r G(/ Address: 1114164='' " 11 b% Ru\AiAu. ras . Address: f/-2 /t Air /Z " /41 )g Agenda Item: P -- ( 3- 0 S Subject: C./ 6' ❑ For Proposal Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes 0,No Wish to Speak: ip Yes ❑ No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing Planning Commission - Public Hearing May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 L11) Name (Please Print): J a h (*). rt ?e_--) C �l � � Name (Please Print): C4o N/C#0 �� 4 — Address: /a a S N Per-Th-1 ,P Address: ����S -�6Q / l 2 `� ! Agenda Item: � CPR -0 Agenda Item: �A 0 �`� ❑ For Proposal ❑ For Proposal AOpposed to Proposal F4 Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral ❑ Neutral IF NE C 6 5'9/rf Wish to Speak: 0 Yes No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY May 27, 2004 Planning Commission - Public Comment May 27, 2004 Name (Please Print): w e e - ± Name Please Print): /()i IMA-44 Address: / ° a d /1/ I Address: /0 /no 5 {fie_►" r i Agenda Item: f • 3 d Subject: (��� —D - /S— ❑ For Proposal yi Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes 7( No Wish to Speak: JYes ❑ No -- - - - -- CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing Planning Commission - Public Hearing May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 � 0�'l et r' e3,- r' rPf Name (Please Print): Imo(; K Mort ��s Name (Please Print): Address: /0,2_0 /Y: 1-t-hV i uY A7Q• Address: ///e(,r - 13v Gay CIX C�50 S 0/)- O36ZAgendaItem:Agenda Item: C. ❑ For Proposal ❑ For Proposal al Opposed to Proposal posed to Proposal ❑ Neutral ❑ Neutral i Wish to Speak: 0 Yes , r. No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing i CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY May 27, 2004 Planning Commission - Public Hearing May 27, 2004 Name (Please Print): Vab/e r / a 1-7- 11, ,� / Name (Please Print): Ta I G#t �-Q Address: /0/7 /t�"i ,' / te- //dS14 ,f, 4(4T Address: Agenda Item: PAL 51-55-- )651-- 0305-Agenda Item: ❑ For Proposal ❑ For Proposal 211-Opposed to Proposal I, • pposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes XNo Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes ) No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY May 27, 2004 Planning Commission - Public Comment May 27, 2004 Name (Please Print): I ,r 13/4 Please Print): 5-��( f/`� / Address: /(%' p '-� �� �� Name� � r� ( /�/�.� 0 G L Address: /Go ( Arc/ �!/r- ,t�dr Agenda Item: -� Subject: C P' / 3 ❑ For Proposal E Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: 111Yes ta No Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes / . No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission — Public Hearing Planning Commission — Public Hearing May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 Name (Please Print): ` I4- 4 19- •--76 74.9- /e- Name (Please Print): W - iF2 /1 Address: j / 4) - 6-Ge_P �Cf Address: I Gf Agenda Item: l.( � ,/LL xi 0 4a P/9 I o /4/ 673 � '' Agenda Item: � ❑ For Proposal ❑ For Proposal N. Opposed to Proposal g Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes ►i- No Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes `INo CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission — Public Hearing Planning Commission — Public Hearing May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 Name (Please Print): A) L L . /11/917y6-,--- Name (Please Print): ,476)/9/Y ZS Gc--)./4 42-E/V Address: l7 (c? A" Pz--cep %tie- Address: 7/7 a L C:? 76E2- v Agenda Item: (...e v � �L C /U'CP4 -6F Agenda Item: Ci°4" 0 3 `- 2 ❑ For Proposal ❑ For Proposal ki° Opposed to Proposal ."Opposed to Proposal ❑ Neutral ❑ Neutral Wish to Speak: 0 Yes LNo Wish to Speak: 0 Yes j2KNo CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing Planning Commission - Public Hearing May 27, 2004 May 27, 2004 Name (Please Print):/ &'a- ' ! i ` 0S- -a/ Name (Please Print): FJ rJG rr/7/ U t' Ai b Address: Address: /Oa At F-22 �l� Agenda Item: i/ot ( F/ " U3 - (2) 7 Agenda Item: (1 PA - 6) 3- O.� ❑ For Proposal ❑ For Proposal ` Opposed to Proposal 11 Opposed to Proposal El Neutral El Neutral Wish to Speak: L,Yes Cl No Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Hearing CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY May 27, 2004 Planning Commission - Public Comment May 27, 2004 f0 Name (Please Print): VET\t1" C yI g 0 /I Name (Please Print): cart/e v Address: � '� r7 l �` / 9 �F� Address: '9/0/ /7 /97A Agenda Item: Cp. op 7 Subject: O fQ -Q3-Q7 El For Proposal Opposed to Proposal (; RK ./� II] Neutral Wish to ❑Speak: Yes g No Wish to Speak: CI No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Comment May 27, 2004 (Please Print): 1).47x.i Name Address: C Subject: a-72_/774-15 2jgAzifT 731/-4" Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes \/,?❑ No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission - Public Comment May 27, 2004 (Please ) 7 ) ' /- //e Name Print Address: eO L 7 / A -� Subject: )047. pl4i) Wish to Speak: Yes 0 No