The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1190-78 ~ ♦ ' t 3 FILE DOCUMENT LOG File Appl i cant Date Started - , IO# , Date Received DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION r) ' 7~ . 3 UL ~ ~ ~ !d ~ " (o `7~ r s ~ j e.RID ~ yn ' 7 R2f~ pJ'/• ~ (7( ~ ~ . ~ry,{.(~ r ♦ ~ ~ ~ • 7C- o ~ . ~ . F '7~ . f7~ Ilo -77 IF `7~ _JA . ~ ~ j-~ "'Y~~ • ~ : ~ j' ' ~ . , ~ - - - • - ; ~ - , ~ s ` - - ' -Y - - - /f II M I J w ~ . '.'4. ' - - ' . • ~~~~i w . ~ HlCiiiES i`~OW LC:~~~A216-JD ON IV!A.-`a_IER RCJ,AD ~ETW~EN BROADWA1~ & VIISSION STS. + =r e ` ~ - ~ ~ .'y~• ~ t+, J- r L~_ . , o • , ~ - . 'w f . _ ' ~e . ~ . e ~ ~f. ~ t X J M ~ ....r.. . ~ - ~Y • ~ . ~ '+r ~ ' - - ~ -'~y'~ . • ~ ~ i ro,,, . 1 y • ~ ~ ► i . ' - ~ I i . * ~n~ • - . . . j - P w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r f '.i ~ ~ ' ~ . ~+4~ r 1'Ii . j ~'~~ti,.r ~ ' _ ~ i . . . j i i ~ ,R B 1 i ~ ~ 1 p M t ' Pft ~ ; , + r • - + . t i ~ i , ~ onnsstruction erviCeso N Gr r ~ 0 Ec)~O(Dco9 N 708 Argonne, Swte G ~ - Phone (509) 922-1705 Spokane, Washington 99206 April 17, 1979 Mr. W. Nubbard Spokane County Planning N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Re: Poochies Addition Dear Wally: Poochies Addition as designed in the existing file in your office is inactive as far as we're concerned and J. Pat 0'Nei11 is concerned. To my knowledge, the property has been sold as one parcel. Thank you very much. Si re y yours, / Carol Scribner President CS/lw \ ` . . No. 7s 646 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. IN THE MATTER OF TNE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ) THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ) CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S AGENDA, DATED ) RESOLUTION APRIL 28, 1978. . ) WHEREAS, the 8oard of County Commissioners of Spokane County, pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620, shall upon receipt of any recommended official control or amendment thereto, at its next regular public meeting set the date for a public meeting where it may Dv ordinance, adopt or reject the official control or amendment; arid I WHEREAS, the 6oard of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by Resolution No. 78 620 acknowledge receipt of the recorrnnendations from the Spokane County Planning Commission concerning its Agenda, dated April 28, 1978, and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by said res- o?ution set this 18th day of May to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission concerning its April 28, 1978, 1978 agenda, a copy of said recorrnnendations are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Comnissioners of Spokane ~ounty, Washington, that based upon the information available to the Board and thA ~estimony at this meeting the following action was taken: PE-1180-78 - ANCHOR SECURITIES SUBDIVISION N0. 5, REPLAT #1: PIONEER NOMES, INC. ZE- 45-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURaL SUBURBAN The Boa rd concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve , the change in condition of the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearing with von- sideration of the environmental review. 2. PS-1165-77 - EWELL SUBDIVISION: EWELL ZS- 2OT-77 - AI Cl1LTURAL SUBU tRAN f67S I NGLE FAMI LY RES I DENT I AL AND TWO FAMI LY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the einvironmenY.a' re- view. The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to tone the property to the Single Family Residential zone classification and 7wo Family Residential Zone Classification upon the filing of the final ' plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the ~?linG of the final plat. 3. PE-1178-78 - PONDRA PINES FIRST ADDITION: WOLFLAND, INC. ZE- 43-78 ~ AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT!A• Having received a communication in disagreement with Planning Commission'r recommendation for denial, the Board set a date of 45", 19j'x at ,~F,'DO 145`7 7p~,. of sai d day to further co i der the matter. 4. PE-1182-75 - CASCADE HEIGHTS ADDITION: MC CLOSKEY ZE- 47-78 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to continue this preliminary plat to the May Agenda. PE-1188-78 - PACE ADDITION: MYERS ZE- 58-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a communication in disagreement with th lanning Commissior'-c recomma^dation for approval, the Board set adate of R p?. /p,-7f at of sa4,~ H-dy t0 fUr`"."o- consi der ;ne :er. , _t l „ ~ ~ . 6. PE-1183-78 - MISSION VILLA ADDITION: DAHLQUIST ZE- 48-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recomnendation to continue the preliminary plat to the May Agenda. 7. PE-1186-78 - PELLEY'S ADDITION REUISED: NOLL ZE- 56-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN , The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recomnendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Planning Corrunission's recommendation to zone the property to the Agricultural Suburban zone upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. 8. PN-1189-78 - NORTH PARK INDUSTRIAL ADDITION: MC CORMACK ZN- 59-78 - MANUFACTURING TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL Having received a communication in disagreement with th LPlanning Commission's recommendation for approval, the Board set a date of at of said day to further conside the matter. 9. PE-1190-78 - POOCHIES ADDITION: NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND ASSOC., INC. ZE- 60-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a comnunication in disagreement with he lanning Commission's recommendation for denial, the Board set a date of a~~ G~ /`1"Idp at Z r1,/~, 2j~. of said day to further consid r t matter. 10. PN-1191- 78 - NORTH P I NE AC RES ADDI T I OPJ : R. Y. C. 0. COMPANY ZN- 61-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN Having received a communication in disagreement with e Planning Commission's recommendation for denial, the Board set a date of 1~;17e at y~, of said day to further consid the matter. . 11. PUDE-1-77 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: RAYNOR PE-1192-78 - THE MEADOWS: RAYNOR Naving received a communication in disagreement with P anning Commission's recommendation for denial, the Board set a date of at 3 ; 416' of said day to further co ide the matter. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby authorizes its chairman to sign Final Declarations of Non-Significance for each item approved above, subject to compliance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15.340. , BY TNE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS DAY OF , 1918• BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 10 ATTEST: VERNON . OHLAND Clerk the Board ~ B Y : eputy ; ~ ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ( AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION, PE-11:90-78, POOCHIE'S ( ADDITION, ZE-60-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY ( NOTICE OF PUBLIC RESIDENTIAL, SPONSOR: NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION ( HEARING SERVICES & ASSOCIATES, INC. { NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 p.m., on July 6, 1978, at their office in the County Courthouse to consider the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification on the following described property; Section 15, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. The SW4 and the West 10 feet of the SE4 of Tract 100 of VERA as recorded in Uolume "0" of plats, page 30 Spokane County, 4Jashington. Except the North 10 feet thereof. Located in the NE4 Section 15. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether of not this proposal will have a significant adverse environ- mental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony either for or against the application of the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 18 day of May, 1978. VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk of the Board BY - t-~..... Ros`an Montague, Deputy Clerk ~ ~ ~ ► _ r ~ l1T~ y.~rrQ n i g .~7C .__prz 2 , , . . PoOC'_^ieS AdL7.'.,l or : Nortu;-r8:z4- "cr_StZUCtiOri Services 2.7td r".SFOC`. , ! ~C. y~ i 60-7Q - Aa'I'1Ct2i tc Si r,,?Ie "'3!^~ly ~ES1de^t? al PRMTVIII.4RY sU7~j7Tsi Oszs tis1r zorE RLcLQSszPT nAr;,TO,TC St =.£f fi-:'!"FS reo~rding P~'-11aQ-7R, Poochies Addit z cr_: G.~, 1 A~. ? Ip OPrr-ATT OrT : Location Poocries Addi,tion is Cituzted in t'r_e Scoriane jT?11.Ay, sout'r. Of Mission Avenue and directli east o'f,i(~mer Road, • B. F'roposal Tre applicant proposes to su'edivide about 27L acres into 8 lats all £or. single family dwellings. The proposal would create a plat wi.th a density o#' about 3 units per acre, with a typical lot size of about 11,000 sQUare feet per let. 12 U, - C, Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan Poochies Addition is situated within an area that 'o-as been designated as being suitable for resident~al development by the app=oved maD of the Comr•reher_sive P1an. _Kithin tha.t ComFrehensive P1an, 'aowever, r ~ no densities `s of y-et have been indicated. , 49 D . E;tist?:~g Lar_d ''ses . The siLe :s presenjl;,r vacanl w; t', .^_o ~i,7:4fi.car.i toroc-w-2Fhic f:atures be_^g evider_t. Tl,,e rroperties t-haw geneiC? Ily :.urrcund ±,ni-s pr^~n_--a2 I'_3.'IP develotiPra over l1lP_ '.'c?arS i;'sLQ st'VC?"?l Z'r'-i r?`'.:.G1 ~ n. vO~tz2 'i ni 1_+ f q-i±'n ~',~r;5t'.:.72~ T? J`~ ~~V n ~t o~ c-r~-jii co_ r atrre_a _r._ c 1a :-Fjcvt ~ Tt-n-e rroposal~ ~ ei..~ ~~+o~.^e._t_c vz ~ . ~w~l cOMrat-ible Y"i±'1 aY1~geC j' 1 ~1TG` ~ ir. ~ h e .rF a TP1 a ~ oe cor+~~~+? ~le ~.jt~ reCEPlt ~'I~,;~YiiriE '4!rt'i .'cn ~prisicrs ir. lne areao T~r-• T Or~r1.••-/~T ) .Jt'~._.,... w i;Cl11ati02'? m,o- e nroinen r's Cd r_C? ~_~s r: °`T=E^;e r3 T,I - _Is -ZrOtO: a: 2:?C'~r°1i' ` I ri r~ ex:~ "g Couni r ?'^ah~ ?re •.iA`F.,tl : .~YT7;~ ^t`~A ri- •J " c~,.'Te 1.r-P s'..._~, tl?a~. 1re ~1at shcal d Ire L gd 6._ -*~ec~~ Co a, o tL . !~`~i n~ ~ r. .,e ' c ~.~.ve . ~ ' T'2'oT?QSpd (;:;ild2s3.C tO i.'l"E P.c.s± -,••-•-pt-v "irp. ^ecoramends xs a cor.ci1--cn of ?1zt z~~re•.~~ , ~ _ s -;;_1'•__ Y ,~-~r f; e n c : tL.~ nM--- -'r ' ra Zr e~ Pr . .._e s t e ~.v eific~.~.o. n o. .7 . _~--~!ee~ a • - ~ . 1L _Q_ ~ r, ~ ~ ~ PE-1190-78 - Poochies Addition April 28, 1978 (Continued) C. V-Iater Supply ~ - r The proposed subdivision is situated within the recorded service area of the Vera I rriga,tion District. That district indicates that it does have the abiZity to serve the site with both donestic a.r.d fire flows. , D. Drainage The staff finds that because of the Tel.ativel.y ~lat terrain of t'~e site, and -that of the adjacent Droperties, t'rat no =ecial drair.age +ontrol methods would probably be reauired and stardard 11.echniques for 9torm water con+rol could be employed. E. Fire Protectior_ The proposed suodiv?sion is situated wi+hin the recorded area of F-i-ge ec.toDn-.JD~qtrict ~1. That distri-c -lv- Indicztes ~hat as a condition of approval, both mains and ",ydra.nts of sufficient Gize for fiz,g nrotectio nneeis should be recuired. F. Parks NQ c~ tlntv rarks are currently availa'ole in the area and the County Parks Department has r_o present plan for either site acauisition or, major Dark imrrovements, " . . G. Schools The proposed subdivision is situated within coundzries of the ~ Cer.tral Valley Schaol Distri c t . The diStrictc 'L-.ciZ i±ies in area are cirrently a.t capacity levels. T'^ey believe v::::3 problem may be miti;a.ted somewhat -nren thei.r c,:,rrert zuild~-ng rro;;ra, ? s completed in about ? years tzie. ~ I I j, ZCIT? :ZG Al; AL ~ ST S - The staff finds that il wou1d be ap~repriate to recl2ssif;,~ t~-s proposal to the SinR? e Fa,r,iilZ Res? de^tip-I"Zo,;~e Classi`'? c!ition '~ecause of the use and c~:aracter ef the present proresal P-s 7tell as lub-3.t Qf t^E Sl1TTOundl'!g prozerties. Tte Staff ?is0 fl:at a?^ ,~.pgrade to the Single F3.mily Resi.dpni=al 7or:e ^la~^~ f~cat ~ or_ rr.i;Zd ~e consis ~an+ with recen~ P1-nn~n~; Co~.~_ ~Sion i T ,~~tr£~'lc~S Th P. S~2.ff .'!aS revyorred tre ei^_Vilr!1.±Pr;+ 2.~ C;'"e ~:Ci.iS~ a~JArcP Qn.r= 7•n,•^~W ~~l a'nnl i C~cTlt 2,1'!d ^'e f_nC t'h?t T10 51g?'?ifLC2?'tt wo~ald lilcel;;• re5u? t fr om ~;s r- ca~os ?1 qr.d a~ror,-~Fp:? rPc1-P-ra';or or , 3^_OIi-S? P?11i? C2.nCe °t'OL<ld c@ 1SG'i.e0.. Sl? SI'?1 ?G'rP rSe ?n~~i rnrl?l~'Zi~?1 ; i'1raCtS Rere however no ted :znder f1he flM'_owin.g- ^ues t'ions: qart:~, a.~~terL ~ flora, fauna, noise, I:gnt and glare, la.nd use, popu? ation, `r_ausing, t . transportazien, circulation, pu'olic services, energ-y and uti?ities. ~ -9B- < <1 d A ? ' . ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL REQUEST FORM Yo ur na m e:Northwest Construction Services & Assoc.Inc.Date: 5J16/78 . Address: E. 91.11 Mission, Suite G Phone No: 922-1705 Planning Commission Action Being Appealed fV1AY 1 r; 1y7~; dFRS Title Poochi es Addi ti on COUNTY CQMMI.00 , I. D. Number PE~'~' 8 Date of Action 5/2/78 _ - Signature~ - Your Reasons for Appeal: Proposent disagrees with the decision for denial by the Planning Commision and feels that the density and proposed lot sizes would be appropriate for the area. Information will be presented at the appeal hearing in that regard. , R . ECEIVED M AY 17 1 9.ZB SPOKANE COUNTY KAHiViNG DEPARTMENT ~ ) PE-1'IT I C N Tos Spokane County P1Bn.n inp; Commi sa i,on Sub,eat:. PE-1194-7,8 Pooahie's Addition - - 2E-60-78 I l We. the uadersigaed, do 8toutly object to this above ~ ref$reaced application sutrivitted by,Cnrol Scribner for Northxeat Conetructlon Serviaee and lissoc., Inc., and respeatfully request the aomunisslon deny eaid appl-icatiom on tbe ground s attaa'h ed herQ to a.nd mad ea part hereog t ~ i,ength Lot 4 ~ I AESS PHC►DT!, °f 3ize ~ 1lAI4E A;OD ~ ~ R' • 1• _ ° ~ ~ / 3 ~,,1 /`y'l~rr~~/i~' ~o. 63~1'~ ~-o y~ , ip. o 4.1 2. 1L~` / ~'f~l~i~~~e : `1~~~~' .~E~L• ~ ~ ~ J~ + 9 ~ ' ' ~i Z_ 4 ~ 4 C/ v ~d-I~ mI-% ~ ~ ~ /~l~~G~~~L~... g~~' S , _50 ~ 6 ! I' Al. 1 •s/•.-tv ..,/,n/ f.e' ~ 6 ~!i' ~ d ~5 ~ ,~L ~ 3.~. ,,,,~.f~/~ ~4' c/// xlr~- r-3 ~ . ~I f4 T ' ~7 1100 o~ 12 s~a~, Ff°`2 i~~~ . .ft A .~A ' 1Ci v ~`J~. C . ~ A ~ l~~ ~ ~ / c1~~r) y ~-r---~ • • ~ IN ~Y"a~'~ _ ; ~ / L~"~ • ~ 1 ~ O ~ ✓T e r./ ~',►'ti i~ 'l '~.c ~ ,y ~ r , ~''s+ ~ / „ _ ,,C/~~ ' 1 . ~ / .r c! ,~C~''~ • ~ ~ _ , . , ~ . ~ - , j .J ~y 166 ~ ~ ~-y-u~ti.~•:~~ ' `r: a ~ Y _ . ~ ~ : `,s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.L • ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~~,~r ' ~ • L L','~ ~~g f ~s> ~ f A 11~~~ ~:-r~ ~ ~ ~i~, ~ 4- ~ i~' ~ ~ f C G ~ , ~f'- ~ / ~ ~ . ~ 18. • ' ~ QCI ~ e ~ •y- ~ L@21$th L0t- NAME ADDRESS PHONE of `512e Res. _ ~ ~ 14 I t' ~a~d~ - -~-~t.- ~A~`~ ` At) ~ 2,0 ,I f ~ / ~ l ~ ys~ ~ 1,:, • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~<< x ~1 ~ - 210: ~ . ` ~ . ° - f ~ ' ! d , Z2'~ I ` 2,3, ! , ► , ~ ;;Z ( _ G c ~`~I r ~ la , 24. . ~ i~~C, i~~.d• ~ 2 26&~„/`~'-~ zlva , •r~e , --r ~y ~ • ~7' ~SX~~ ~%•~9-=,' ` x/I L J 28. - , ~ 27s ~ _ _ _ . - - - _ - - - . . - - - ~ 30. , 31 e ,~~~l~le/~ c~~ , . Z►,~~-~ ~ ~ 32. 330 - - . ~ 34• - - 35• ~ ~ y • 36„0 37. ` 38• ~ .C C a~~e1//in-- . a ' ' ~ _ - - - - - - - --es~ i ~ - b STATEMENT OF OPPOS IT ION The majority of people residing on I:amer Road between Broadway and P.;ission Streets purchased their property for several reasons - the most impo rtant one being the avail- ability of acreage. The open space and quietness of the area and small amount of local traffic were other contri- buting factors. Most of the residents have a minimum of two acres of land - some have four or more and most of them use this land for cattle aiidjor horses. The agri- cultural zoning is very importartt to us. It is a possi- bility that a change in the zoning to singl.e family residential could eventually prohibit future land use for aur aanimals. ° We are co-ncerned that the quality of the proposed structures to be built on the site in question would have a serious Ympac-t on the surrounding land va.lues. It is reasonable to assume that the homes would not be in keeping with the values of the existing houses and this would lead to a transient type owner - some one just living there long . enough to build equity to purchase amore desireable home in a less crowded area. We beliPve this development would lead to a low-income type of env.ironment - a condition that no one would like to have in the:tr neighborhood. In reviewing the length of residence of the preserit home owners, we found that the neighborhood has a very stable population - many people have lived here for over 20 years. ` ~ • . . 2 Annther problem that would surface with eight additio nal homes is the increased traffic. Nlost familys have 2 cars, many also have boats, trailers and motorcycles. We are anxious to prevent a situation like the one that has been allowed to deve?ope on East Mission between Best and Sullivan. . We would like to know the exact description of the land ~o be used for this proposed proj ect. Yde know that the ~ v3cant propert,y measures less than two acres. Where is the balance of the 2.5 acres located? It is the feeling of the neighborhood that one home, two at the very most, is all that should be aTlowed on the property in quest ion. This wou.ld be in balanc e with the r,est of the area and be an asset to current property values, if properly planned - not a devaluation. In conclusion it is the feeling of all persons signing this petition against the re-zoning that the changes would sharply lotiyer our land values arid restrict our right to a quiet and peaceful neighborhood such as now exists. We believe that this project woLild have an adverse environrnental impact on the area. Studies have been carried out since the late 1950°s in the Spo.kane Valley pertaining to our "Sole Source Aquifer". There is a current study being completed by various godernment agencies. These studies neither prove or disprove the thesis that we may be irreversibly contaminat- ing our water supply. Continued placement of waste water disposal systems near new housing developments coupled with px°e-existing disposal systems puts our only water supply in danger. Edward J. Mos e s N. 1417 Mamsr Roa d Spokane, We. 99216 Apri 1 25, 1c,,78 T o Whom I tMay C onc ern : M,y fam i ly ard I move d to t he add re ss sh own a bov e dur ing the ea rly summer mont hs of 1975, Our pr inary purpose for mov ing to thi s valley 1 oca, tion was to re- locate f rom the ci ty to a less -populated loc ation and one whi c h ass ured me o f mo re pro per ty wi th my home. I made sure vjhen I bought the orope rty on which I cu rrently 1 ive that the home adequate ly su ited the s i t e and 1 oc ati on , ti1le nade su re, f or exam ple , that the trees which wer'n lo:;ated on the propnrty rema ined ilitact. We, t oo , ha.d our custom-buf lt home arranged in such a manner as to not det"Lact in the slightest f rom the ne i ghborhood . This w(as done ilvi th the f ine coordination and cooperation o:' th° builder~ Mr. Blaine Johnston, ~vho is attahhed to t~le Tomlinson gency. I fee 1 strongly for any actian vihi ch vr i11 enhanc e the value of my property and /~or rr~y ne ighbor's , as tiqell. I am just as strong in -my feelin~s toviard any action which wi 11 detract from the value or my property or the comfo rt which I fee 1 is rightfu lly mine or my neighbors. Conjunctive ly, I an agains t any action wh ich will significantly alter my "llfe style" in any way. I feel that anyone who moves into such a neig'nborhood as the one in which I'm 10~ ateci is obligated to up- hold the life style (and orga.nIZation) of that neigh- borhood. ~ , ENARD J. MOSES 2t) . SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION N 811 Jefferson Spokane 9 Washington 99260 May 8, 1978 Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House Spokane, Washington 99260 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane Co~anty Planning Commission on Friday, April 28, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 11 :55 A.M.9 reconvening at 1:30 P.M. to 6:55 P.M. in the Fiealth Building Auditorium Room 140. A continuation of that hearing was held on May 2, 1978, at 7:30 P.M. to 12:00 P.M. in the Cou.nty Commissioner's Assem- bly Room. The enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrso Rawlings, Messrse Main and Thomas. Mr. Thomas was not, however, present at the May 2, 1978 continuation hearing. Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Quigley were a1 so present. Plannzng Staff present: Dayharsh, Fergen, Bethards, Mosher and Brumleve. Engineer's Office: Kennalyo Environmental Health Office: Anicetti. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio. Sincerely, SPOKANE COIINTY PLANNIVG COMMISSION Ted McCoury, Chairman Fred L. Dayharsh, Director of Planning FLD/sb Official minutes and record of action taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at their regul.ar hearing held on April 28, 1078, and May 2, 1978. . C~~ ~ . 5. PE-1180-78, ANCHOR SECURITIES SUBDIVISION V0. 5, REPLAT #1: PIONEER HOMES, INCa, and ZE-45-7$, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SIIBURBAN: That the change in condition be approved, from 9 lots to 12 lots, on t12e previously approved preliminary plat of Anchor Securities Subdivision No. 5, Replat #1. 6. PS-1165-77, EWELL SUBDIVISIOrI: EWELL anci ZS-207-77, AGRICULTURAL SIIBURBAN AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staif's Findings, dated April 28, 1978. (Motion by Quigley, seconded by Kennedy. Vote was unanimouso) 7. PE-1178-78, PONDRA PINES FIRST ADDITION: uJOLF'LA,ND, INC., and ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SIIBUR$AN and/or SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL : To deny ti-rithout predjudice, as lot size was not consistant in the area. (Motion by Rawlings, seconded by Kennedy. Vote was unanimous.) 8. PE-1182-78, CASCADE HEIGHTS ADDITION : MG CLOSKEY, and ZE-47-78, SNi GLE FAMILY RFSIDIIUTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAr1ILY SUBURBAN : This ztem zs continued until the May 1978 Planni.ng Commission Hearing, as there was an error in advertising. The Planning Department wi11 pay a11 readvertisement costso 9. PE-1188-78, PACE ADDITION: MYERS, and ZE-58-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SIVGLE FAs~ISLY RESIDENTI.A.L: That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving adopts the Staff's Findin;s as the Planning Cocnmission iinciings oi fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Stafi's FindLngs, dated April 28, 1978; except that the following conditions shall be incorporated; shat the plat be redesigned to include a stub road connection to the south and urest. (Motion by Quigley, seconded by Byrne. Vote vfas unanimous. Mro Main abstained from hearing and voting on this item oecause of a confl?ct of interest.) 10. PE-1183-78, MISSION VILLA ADDITION : DAHL•9UIST, and ZE-4$-78, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIA.L MOBILE xd''~iIE: This item is cont2.nued untll the May 1978 Planning Commission Hearing, as there was a.n error in advertising. The Planning Department wilZ pay all readvertisement costs. 11. PE-1186-78, PELLEY 'S ADDITI4N REVI,SED : NOLL, and ZE-56-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the prellminary plat request be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planni.ng Commission findings of fact as c,rell as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findulgs, dated April 28, 19?80 (Motion by Rawlings, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous.) 12. PN-i189-787 NaRTH PARK ItVDUSTRIAL ADDITION: MC CORMACK, and ZN-59-78, MANTTFACTURING TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL: That the preliminary plat req_uest be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings oi fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, dated April 28, 1978; except that the following conditzons shall be incorporated: That standard condition H-5 be included in the conditions, and also that the preliminary plat mo with the recommendation of a public sewer s,ystema (Motzon by Byrne, seconded by Rawli-ngs. Vote was unanimous. ) u LM 13. PE-1190-78, POOCHIES ADDITION : NORTHtidFST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND ASSOC., INC o, and 7E-60-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMIZY RESIDENTIAL: That luhe preliminary plat request be derii.ed because of being incompatible with lot sizes and uses on the street on which property is located. (Motion by Kennedy9 seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous.) 9 ` • , - ~ P E T I T I 0 N To: Spokane Cou,Mty Planning Commission Subject: PE-1190-78 Poochie's .Additlon zE-6o-78 v1e. the undersigned, do atoutly object to thin aboee refereMCPd anplication.aub~itted by Carol ~cribnor for Northwent Comstruction Serviceu and Assoc., Inc., And respectfully request the co-m-nia~~on dcry said. anplicatlon on the grounds attached hEreto anrl ~~~e a paxt hereof : ~e r),a~ 4n Lot I~ZAM E ADDRESS PHI 0 rk"'~ oi Size w' 1 s • / 3~i/ ~/~/rl~~ ~'Y~~(7~V / 1--e> I iP '~.O /9• ~ • < ~ , ,v 13c~3 /v . . / ~~jt~•,~ /Y ~ ~'R ~ Ql v .r-- rr~ 53 ~ •4 . , %,~~1~ v • 1, ~fi• ~ 'J ; ,/8,, ~ v~o • • CF,~.~~ ;~.~7` ~ ~ ~ ,~'~~S- 'LZ . .4 s , -7~ - .`o . ~ ~ 7~,~ ~ ~a os~ /)IA ~7Q ~ ~R.s ~ ~ . J . V - t L rq ~Z -(J /)-6 /o --w~ ~ ~ 6 14 ~ ~ l / , ~ W~ / • W V f/ r 4 ~ ~ ~ . ~ . Lt~~~th L0$ NAME ADDRE.~ ~ ~HONE of 5 ize Resa ~1 . I9b~ V ~ ~ . /t7- 400, i. E- . _ ~ ~K~ O~/ / ~ l,,~-,, { / r'' r~ /D~ j/~ ' / ~~~~..~~~•V o 1~ ~'d,/~ ~ !~7 ~'f ~L ' ! V \ r~.~-.~~ ~ ~ ~ . _ i f _ J ~ " j Jf' r ~w.~ 26 e a~.~-/y.~ ~l"/+`l!✓.~ ~ ~~C~•`~.G-G.I~ ~'l s 6 il ~ ! ~ ` _ _ . ~ r . X~, _ - r 28. 2 g ° - - - - - - 3O 4 31. 9- /9 32 • 330 340 350 36. 370 3 8 • sTATEr.~ENT OF oProSITzoN The ma jrrity of peop? e residing on Mamer Road betwEen Broadway an_d It►issiori Streets purcha~ed thei.r proper-ty for several ?^Easons - the most i-mportanl; one beir_g the avail- ab? lity of acr. eagee The open sDace and quietness oi the area and small amflunt of local itrc-if'fic were other contri-- a,Ating _~'ac-cors. VLost of the Y•esidents have a rninimum of two acres af" land -some have four or more ar_d most of them use tn.is land for cattle andfor horses. The agri- cu? -tural zoriing is very importarit to us. It a.s a possi- bility t.hat a. change in the zoxi3.ng to single family residential cauld eventually prohibit future Iand use for our anianals. We are concexnecl that the quality of the proposea structures -to be buil'f: on the s; te Zn questian would have a sexious impact on the surrounding land va1ues. It is reasonable to assuane -t;hat the homes would not be in keepina witn th~ values of -the exiyting houses and -th-is would leac3 to a transieiit type owner - some oYie just livinx; there long enough to bui? dequ? Vy -to purci~asse amore dcsir~~ble home in a less crowded areae We believe this developm@nt would lead -i:o a low-income -tvpe of enwi,ronment - a con.di tion that na one would li-ke to liave in -thea.r neighborhood. I In x•eWiewing the leng-L-h af resxdence of 'the present home ownersf we found ichc-Lt 'the neighbcjrhood h~s a ver~ sttab1e population - many people have lived here for over 20 years,. ~ . 2 Another problem that would surface with eight additional homes is the increased traffic. Nlost familys have 2 cars, many also have boats, trailers and motorcycles. We are anxious to prevent a situation like the one that has been allowed to develope on East Ivriission between Best and Sullivan. We would like to know the exact description of the land to be used for this proposed pro ject. We know that the vacant property measures less than two acres. Where is the balance of the 2.5 acres located? It is the feeling of the neighborhood that one home, two at the very most, is all that should be allowed on the property in question. This would be in balance with the rest of the area and be an assel; to current property values, if properly planned - not a deva.luation. In conclusion it is the feeling of all persons signing this petition against the re-zoning that the changes would sharply lower our land values and restrict our right to a quiet and peaceful neighborhoad such as now exists. We believe that this project wovld have an adverse environmental impact on the area. . , . ~ Studies have been carried out since the late 1950's in the Spokane Valley pertaining to our "Sole Source Aquifer". There is a current study being completed by various government agencies. These studies neither prove or disprove the thesis that we may be irreversibly contaminat- ing our water supply. Continued placement of waste water disposal systems near new housing developments coupled with pre-existing disposal systems puts our only water supply in danger. , . . Edward J. Mos e s N. 1417 Ma.mer Roa d Spokane, Wa. 99216 Apri 1 25, 1978 To Whom It Pda.y Conc °rn : My fam i ly ard I move d to t he addre ss sh own abov e dur ing the ea rly summe r mont hs of 1975. Our pr inary purpose for mov ing to thi s valley location was to re- locate f rom the ci ty to a less -popula. ted loc ation and one whi c h ass ure d me o f mo re pro per ty wi th my home. I ma.de sure when I bought the Property on which I currently live that the home adequately su ited the s i te and 1 oc ati on. We ma.de su m, for example, that the tree s whi ch were loc ated on the property rema ined intact.We, tQO, had our custorn-bui lt home arrang°d in such a manner as to not detract in the slie hte st from the ne i ghborhood . This was done wi th the f ine Mr. Blaine coordination and cooperat.i on of th° builder4gency. Johnston, who is attabhed to the Tomlinson I f ee 1 s trongly f or any a ct i on vJhi ch wi 11 enhanc e the value of m,y property and/or my nezo-hbor's, as &ell. I am just as strong in my feelinQs toward any action which wi 11 dPtract from the va lue or my property or the comfort which I feel is rightfully min° or my ne ighbors . Conjunctive ly, I~~arn againstany action wh ich v~ill significantl~r alter m,y life style" in any vJay. I feel that anyone who moves into such a neighborhood as the one in which I'm lo~ated is obligated to up- hold the life style (and orga.niZation~ of that neign- borhood. ti EDNARD J. MOSES ~ ~ • • ~ - ~ ' - - - r~x~.-~ ~ ~~~M.~~- • - - - - - - - _ _~'1.e~+~s~ c-4~_!~ ~L~~e~%r~ ~ii:~a~•~- c'`''--- - - - - ' c~-~,c.e.~~~~~ • - _ a ~ - - - - a"~-` v'-ca~ ~ t~.4~.- -~.Q ~u~.~~~.c~ hct.u-c~-c c-Q't J ~c,¢, - - - - - ~ vr~A.c-ecQ To `1'1'1awo - ~ nc{ _ A!cki;tbo-r- wkc...-C,.._ LW& a.u.I~- a. ~ CWu _&,L,-~ «daA A.kA.C _C.,( 449LWja~erri•~.- - --~c~c c~, 1~I.c~-r►~. t,c.~,(, c~ _ _ U - - - &Cl4a C~1( _ - - - ~ ..~tt.t?~tst _YYI~ i1.@;u~zc~~ U ~ - ~ - - - - - - - - ~ Ltkep-Q 04:- 3WAia ~u~G~,=.~►~ c~.~4.~..c~.,~ or U . uo-- 0~ - ,p♦ - ~1 . A~ ~ o _ ~"r ~!4t ~ _ _ ~f~ ' ~JL` '~y"`' Ll4`c~'Rd~.~^~^ _ ) ' y V ~y / V - - - - - n - bcZQ_w -TAI(& bin-e1. AAC&jUbP.~ ►%n w"t&-~a- - - - - a~~ T - - ~ - U - _ `~?~.Ct~ cL ~f -04ad- he-,~21 _wr4-L(1c~_ G46e 't, - ~ t~-4- _ - - ' a.-t-&S - - - - _ t.~V" O-Ua- td).a /azL"trj2-- a I . - - ~1~e~.~,_ ` _ n. _~,~.~.~►~_t~a:~t, tc.e.~.~<;l,¢,~,_ !~.Q.~Q a,~.a~~~s~~;~_ ~ c~ _ _ ~ ~ cv,\. aas ,paAz4a- A~t~ $ h~,.c~.a~ ~.c.aacc.~_ pz ak aA.yt atU4 _ --rAjelQQ UA&4 4y 4n_ cuau.0 f?aa.t ~ V&Ja.' - - - - - - Q. L1'.L~i ~ i'12OXa& 014, f'ttLs1 Qit'~C~,~'%te~ VYt. ~aA~d.etl~1~ t3.?4, U4- W, -*n PA ofeaA ~ C- - 4 C~ti~~~.e ~ Y Edward J. Mose s N. 1417 lliamer Roa d Spokane, We, 99216 Apri 1 25, 1978 To Whom It Iday Conc °rn : My fam i ly and I move d to t he add re ss sh own a bov e dur ing the ea rly surr~rner mont hs of 1975. Our pr ima,ry purpose for mov ing to thi s valley location was to re- locate f rom the ci ty to a less -popu lated loc ation and one whi c h ass ured me of more pro per ty vii th my hame. I made sure when I bou gnt the prope rty on whj. ch I currently 1 ive that the home adequately su ited the s i te and 1 oc ati on. We made su m, for ~xample, that the tree s whi ch werta, loc ated on t,he property rema ined intact. We, t oo , had our custom-bui lt home arranged in such a manner as to not detract in the slighte st f rom the ne i ghborhood. This was done lvi th the f ine coordlna, ti on and c ooDerat-i on of th° bu i lder~ Mr. Blai ne Johnston, who is attahhed to the Tomlinson gency. I f ee 1 s trongly f or any a ct i on whi ch wi 11 enhanc e the value of my property and /or my ne i-ghbor's , as Nell. I am just as strong in my feelin~s to~rard any action which wi 11 detract from the value or my property or the comfo rt which I fee 1 is rightfu lly mine or my neighbors. Conjunctively, I am against any action ivhich will significantly alter my "life style" in any v3ay. I feel that anyone who moves i11to such a neighborhood as the one in which I'm lo;: ated is obligated to up- hold the life style (and organization4 of that neigh- borhood. EDWARD J. MOSES f i , . . ~ ; . ` . P E T I T I 0 N To s Spokan• Couaty PlBnhing Commi ssi on Subject:. PE-1190-78 Poochie's A.ddition ~ ~ ,ZE-60-?8 We. the ux3dergigned, do stoutly object to this above . referenced application aubmittefl by Carol Scribnerfor A1orthxest Construction Services and Assoc.. Inc., an8 ~ respectfully request the commiseion deny said.applicatlon ou the ground8 attached hereto atad made a part hereof-s. ; . LQng ,th jLot IUAME ADDRESS PHONE °f Size Res. . 1. 1-4.) ,11 3 L/ ~C4 4a ~yef- ( 3d'~ ~t> YiP. z ,a /.~c^3 fi~.~5 - ~ ~ 0'0~' 41 3 0,4. . 4 50 ~ ~o~a► ~ ~ /La 5~20 3 ~t ~`,r 6 /f~//• ~ ; . ~ K 71, ~ 7, / 1 ~ ,'i ~,/~sJ /nr : ,t / .G.~~ • .l.ii~ :7 ~n• ~ "',r ' • ~Z.7~~. i ~ 8 & d ~77 9. -,~-y ~ > > y'-~ ~ h. ~ ~ 5 l~ .3 ~3 ~ , f~_ 4 ~ , , ~ ~a~ ~ , T lo. ~y~~.,;~~-~- Z~h . 7e 11 ' C.F..I.J r C' 3 ~ J iY 1 20. t/ / ' I /'i v ~L l •l J i . "L•' ^ Lr _ ~~71f:%,~ II ~-'c'~~f • ~ • qRs 30 ,vr~~ , ~i'/~--~~' / ~•y A / ~Y ~ ~._i i , ~ ,l.d. ~ / a n / v 0 1)4Z1) 1 5' •J~ ~ /.✓~-S l--r ;~n:, ~l'' Y% :1 ti~, ~ . ~~v-~r,..., . 16. -Z ~ =6 s q ~ ~u • • % ~'~T~ ~/'✓..J~'A,.~ ~ e 17 • ~~v • r i ~~c ~ y~~~ ~S~r'l~ dG ~ yi~ ~ 18 , f ~ t-~`~ °I ~ I l / ~ La:~~~, ~1,2 ~ I~ ~~r', L 'Lt Aej . . ; ~ _ . . . e : . ~ • ~ ~ ~ . ~ . Leng-th ~ot ~1AMS ~ AD~3RLS5 `PIiONE~ o~' ` ~;S i 2~ ~ i~ . ~ ~ - , • i 19 ' I-,/2.O ' A, . r ~ 740 Lu 22~ ~ P ` t,~ ~~~c~f _ . G ` ~~1~. f'.~ ~ ZW ` , _ . : ~ , l ~ = ~~i 5 : , ~ 2. 3•W . . ' • + ,'J % n~ Ts i 2414; ;J~v-~-~.-t- C►. 'I J'~~~/,~,~v--~t.~~-t~ ~c~ % ~Y~ / _J ~ _ , } ~ .z,~ ~ . , I1 ,~f ~/.4r~~"~~ rI~'J._ ~ 4~~•~' ~ / ~ . ~ ~ ~ / - ' r - • ,27e ~ 2Se , ' - - - - 2Q0 ~ . ~ 3010 , 31 ~ ~~r~,~~ ' _ -3-. ~ ► 3?• • - I. - - - _ _ ~ 34:o ~ • ' , y • ~ ti • 36 e . . . . . ~ 370 ~ _ - ~ . ~ ; 380 - , , . L, . ~ . r . F • _ ~ o ~ 1 STATEM T OF OPPOSIfiI0N The ma jority af people residing on Ma.mer Raad between Broadway and Misgion Streets purchased their property For several reasons -the most important one being the avai?- ability of acreage. Th.e open space and quietn.ess of the axea and 5ma1Z amaunt Qf local traffie were other contxi- buting factors. Most of the residents have a minimum of two acres of la.nd -same nave foux or more and most of them use this land for cattle ara.d/or horses. The agri- Eultural zaning is very important to us. It is a possi- bility that a cha,nge in the zoning to singie family residential Could eventually prohYbit future land use for our animals. We are concerned that the qual.ity oi the proposed structures to be built on the site in question would have a 5erious Ympact on the surrounding l-and values. It is reasonable to assu-me that the homes would no'LO be in keeping with the values of -the existing hause9 and this would lead to a traneient type owner - some one just living there long enough to build equity to purehase a more desireable home in a, less crowded area. We believe this devel.opment would lead to a low-incom$ type of environment - a conditxon that n,o one wotxld like to have in their neighborhood. In reviewing the len.gth of residence of the presezit home owners, we found that the neighborhood has a very stable poDul.ation - many people have lived here #'or over 24 years. . , . 2 Another problem that would surface with eight additio nal homes is the increased traffic. Most familys have 2 cars, many also have boats, trailers and motorcycles. We are anxious to prevent a situation like the one that has been allowed to develope on East Mission between Best and Sullivan. We would like to know the exact description of the land to be used for this proposed project. We know that the vacant property measures less than two acres. Where is the balance of the 2.5 acres located? It is the feeling of the neighborhood that one home, two at the very most, is all that should be allowed on the property in question. This would be in balance with the rest of the area and be an asset to current property values, if properly planned - not a devaluation. In conclusion it is the feeling of all persons signing this petition against the re-zoning that the changes would sharply lower our land values and restrict our right to a quiet and peaceful neighborhood such as now exists. We believe that this project would have an adverse environmental impact on the area. ! Studies have been carried out since the late 1950's in the Spokane Valley pertaining to our "Sole Source Aquifer". There is a current study being completed by various government agencies. These studies neither prove or disprove the thesis that we may be irreversibly contaminat- ing our water supply. Continued placement of waste water disposal systems near new housing developments coupled with pre-existing disposal systems puts our only water supply in danger. . ~ . , , + . VAI~L.tq FIRt DtT''.R'~'1'''~'T 5POI~ANE . . s~~ . . EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99106 • YELEPHONE (509) 428-1700 - , , April 27, 1978 • , . o , a ' ' Mr. Fred Dayharsh, = P1 anning D' ector ° ~ ' • ~ 'Y , > Spokane County Pianning Comm' sqon North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 . Dear Mr. Dayharsh : ti The following prelimi ar subi~ivion'f,)~nd zone classification for upgrading has be evlewe for firE~protection: - ~ PE-1180-78 ZE- 45-78 Pione,/r esI ~Keto)~~~. : , ~ Main ~ n~,d ~ ned jjo be \Instal1 ed in this area. ~ P E-1188- 78 y~. "~y t~ - - ~ , . ZE- 58- 78 - ; MPns aRd hydr to°' ,b4e,~ ~sta~ l,ed i n this area. N°`, PE-1183-78' *-AO ~ ZE- 48 i78,~, ~ahui~tf ~ ~ nd edRdCin r~hN rea. Ff.re h draAts ns • akl%.t i`1 are wi thi n 'SQO' Iof PE;''l )r$6- 78 Z~ ` 48-78 yoll ~~Mains nstalle~ in th~~~, ea. . - ~ L . ,0 . 4 I' b~ i u. - - . . i a• a Y s ~}rrq~ _ ~(rva1 a 1=s »a • w 'Y~ .fIR c eVx Y" 1.r "i~•'rr ~ » e ~ ~ E Lt. of Inspectors ~ ~ lJ AC:sn ~ . . . , . _ _ . ~ ~ . . PRE YENT FIRES -SAVE LIVE5 » ~ 1 _ M Page 2 , PE-1190- 78 ~ - orthwes t Construction Services & Assoc. Inc. Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. a PE-1192-78 PUDE- 1- 77 Rayner ° A planned unit development would have a significant adverse . impact on fire protection at this time. , . . , . - ~ .a . . _ , - ~FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson 456-5786 ~ -SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 : a» . ~ ; " a , i+' • _ - i az~_" SPOKAfVE COUfVTY GOURT hOUSE March 28, 1978 T0: FRED DAYHARSH, DIRECT R PLANNING FROM: LLOYD L. DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: PRELIMINARY S BDIVISION rPE-1090-77 ZE-50-77 HYDRANTS AND MAINS WILL BE REQUIRED. LLD:Ic Attachment R E C E I V E MAR 2 81978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT / , ~ ~ y - . . . AGIlVDA, MARCH 302 1978 . TELEPHONE: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMMISSION ~ I Time : Thursday, March 30, 1978, 9: 00 A.M. Place: County Health Department Auditorium, Rm. 140 , W. 1101 College PRELIMINARY SIIBDNISION, EXTIIVSION OF TIME 2. PE-1090-77, Forest Green Subdivision Replat #1 ZE- 50-77, Unclassified to Agricultural Suburban a. Location: Lots 5& 6, Block 1; Lots 5, 6, 71 81 9, 10, 11 , 14 and 15, Block 3; and Lot 1, Block 4, Forest Green Subdivision in the NW 14 of Section 23, Township 26 N., Range 45, E.W.M. Spokane County, Washington. b. Sponsor: Joseph G. Ward S. 813 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineers: Clarence E. Simpson Engineers, Inc. N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, wA 99206 d. Site Size: 60 Acres , e. Number of lots: 21 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single Family Dwellings g. Existing Zoning: IInclassified h. Proposed Zoning: ' Agricultural Suburban i. Water Source: Moab Irrigation District j. SchooZ District: East Va11ey School District k. Request an extension of time to: April 1, 1979 J.7V7 ' • . L~.. JVJ~" ~ ~ . i • i"' w ~,r~~~~~ Q ~ 8R SGO~ ~ % ~ + , . s ~ 4 •.,e • r ~ - o J ~ = ~ i • ~ • r,` o t~~ , • ~ ~I •I~ ~ ,b' o;.•' . : ' • ' ~ • • _ Mo 01 1 I d - v % • ~ Tii• Co~n+uri e s 2 o I 2 Z ~ ~i • ~p V 1u s , . ' fL 7 , , , • , • LonG L.nco n ~ NEW LAKEft.. L 3400 EL 2073 - • ~o j ` . • ' . ' • 27 ~,,~ur rp b r ~ . ~o r'~ 3 • : o . ,o M O A~ - . ? % ~ • ~ ~ I//~ V z , . . " ~ : tA ./bCOb a / ~ ~ _ - i ~-,q5 FA S ~ 'r• ~ ~~~~ii,,. • ~ ~ ' m '1 . . .n•' ' V SA r ~ Q 3 90 E 040. • - 2 - . ~ . ~ + _ 1 , ~ . ~'JT.??'SGgrJ L 28 ~ °'c , , PE-1190-7 -Pooch_es Addj r; or : Nortj,vre=+ renstructien Sexvices and Asscc.,Tr.c. 00-?~? -Agricult,ira' to Sir.a;? e~'amil.y Residertial PRF.I,I ~','iI NP_RY SL'P D? T,"I SI O2TS kErD ZOYE PLECLASSI P? C A^TQ?7S . Staf f fiMl-r.Es regarding PE-1190-79, Poochies Additicrs: I. GETYMp.L T 2iFOPp'I_AT? OrT : A. Location Pooc,hies Addition is situzted in }'o-e Spol:ar.e V?llAy, sauth of ?-t-i--sion • Avenue and directl f east of Ma,uier Road. • B. F'roposal The applicant proposes to subdivide about 2+ acres into 8 lots all for single fa.mily dwellings. The proposal would create a plzt with a density of about 3 units per acre, with z typical lot size of about 11,000 sauare feet per lot. • C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan - Poochies Addition is situated within an area that has been designated as being suitable for residential development hy the approved map of the ComFreher_sive Plan. Within that Comprehensive Pla,n, however, no densities as of yet have been indicated. L. Lxisting Laria Uses . The site i-s gresentlJ vacan`, wit'-, ^o °i t=,ifi car.t tQpoEraphic feature> be;r_g evider.t. The rroperfies that ger_erally surMcund ±ilis nr,~nc~.saI ha•re deve, orer? over jhP -r-Pars i:?to GPVE?'?1 residen tlal _:;:r?- 4~ors. ~omPat?),;1~+Y F~Tifr ~x::stino I,a: e ~nes Tt^.2 rrooosal. Qf?I;;~ 1;Z'dse'.'1teC by t.l's j'i'"1 °rn2Z-02' aFre?rs lO i.F ' Co1!tU3-C1hI2 P►lt•, avi ~~iT:c?' L:s?~ iT: tb-8 P-rP? ?.nt= S2Cor:d1y. ?•,rna~c L~ GE CO1fpZfIb12 w1 tC! recEnt FI?I1T1? 21g COR'.C"i^.^.OP_ 62(:? S1CI:S 1P_ t1h@ zrea. _o Jt~rviAT T:TM'r,~ts,~Tr 0' u•. ''1rC1113,ti0n ri,(2e yngineer' s Of4'1C;e f_p-s rPvi2^'P~ t't'_s ^?'OZoo~.? 2Y1^. t~-°,r oI r~ (;P 4.- ~~i1t?Q thc'tt 2x.4SLi:1 g COLl.rltf r^..?da a1'E' ••roEP_rt1J t SEr'~e t:eP Si}?, ti.3t ~~''2 4712? S~:CT.~13. ti'2 red..'S_~:_@(3. sd 3c tC~ ?:~ii,2P'~ t~':e Froposeri Pa°t-wost Cu1de52C t0 thE P_c.Gt :;CrPTZy lZrP. 7-',r,8ir orrirs recomnendJ u."a. v ys a rioY:d? 1_, Qn oi plat a.riTrcvJf 1 , ;i.:-%.'L 3? , t',e PIat t,e r3ved ar_3 -ur'ced l0 1^e stecifiCa':ons of `;-e t,-, 'i;_j?.r.cE-. l~ - - _ 9 _ • . ' R V PE-1190-78 - Poocries Addition April 28, 1978 (Continued) C. V'later Supply The proposed subdivision is situated within the recarded service area of the Vera, I rrigation District. That district indicate9 that it does have the ability to serve the site with both donestic and fire flows, D. Drainage The staff finds that because of the relatively flat terra.in of t'ne site, and that vf the adjacent properties, that no special drainage control methods would probably be reauired and 9tar.dard techniques for gtorm water control could be employed. E. Fire Frotection The proposed subdivi-sion is situated ritY?in the recorded area of Fire Protection District ?1, That district indicates that as a condition of approval, both main-- and hydmnts of sufficient silze for fire protection nee3s should be recuired. F. Parks rlo county parks are currently availaole in the area azid the County Parks Department has no present plan for either site ?cauiQition or major park improvements. ' G. Schools The proposed subdivision is situated within It,-._e ~ou.nc?raes of t:~e Cer.tral Valley School Dlstrict. The district-- fscilities ir_ t;~is area are currently a.t capacity levels. Trey 'oei ~eve ttj:is pro<<? e-i may be mitiated somevihat when their c~-,rrer,t ::ui? d:.r_6 rro,,^_r?..m is completed in about ? fears ti."ie. I? I. ZCTdI :`dG Al; AL -iS' S r - The staff finds tr.at it wozzld be approvriate to reclassifJ t" -is proposal to the Single Fami.ly Reside^.tial Zer.e Classi°ic?tion bec?use of the use and craracter of the gresent prorosal zs well as 'Uhat of the surroundir.g properties. The staff also 'inds t,~al.. an wpgrade to the Single F3.nily Resi_dents al '.or_e as!-ificzt_or_ rni,1~! te consis~an+ with recen+ Pla,nni-ng (om,~s--ion c'.eciu:ons in . e:-e:. T7. TrP Staff inzs revie^:ed the er_viro:2mPntal c~-ecklis' ~~,'rr; l;naz 'tj:-A Gn,Ti?^2Tlt a'2d "'E f-':1d t'_^:?L 3'10 S1&?'?ifican+ 3C'..VP:,"!FA s?n?i;in nmai-ta1 _n;-aC;,c would lilcel;.- result from (i.-.iy PMc-ooS?1 qnd a: rov~~ed rP^? arajio:^ of' 7:OZI-S? gnlf? C2.I1Ce Shf?uld be Iqsiied. S1 i-c-h-t c..Ci.'1P~Se ;3T!~T1ror11'.c'T'i-,:a1 iryraCts Rere however noted under the foI? ocrzno r~z,~estions: eart;~, air, wa.ter, flora, fauna, noise, lignt and glare, land use, pooulation, housing, tra.nsportazian, circulation, public services, energy and utilities. - 9 B - - J OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote ~1Lt C.. Zo , 092B- Inter-office Communication To pIANNING COl4MRSSION f" GARY KENNALY . PLANNING 6 TRAFPIC DIVISION ENGINEER 943w,(-. sub~~ ~~UIDrT.IM * EQR PE l l 90 CJ oa CAAD00041 *CONQITIONS CIRCLEU APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION ' , • that conditional approval of the plat is givea eubjecr to dedicatioR og Right of way to the public and approval oE the road 6ystem in the plat by the County Enginaer; . E 2 that plans, proFiles, and cross sections shocaing proposed strent centerline and curb grado-s be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final p1at; . E 3 that_drainage plan9 and de9lgn calculations showing the grades and alignmsnt of cl~~~n- age racilities be submitted to [he County Engineer for approval prior Co coastruction and the filing of a ficul plat; . (Oconstruction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be perfarmed under tha direct supervision oF a licensed land surveyor. Who ehall be reaponsible for perpetuating all evidonce of ths location of survey monwaants Which paay be dis turbzd during construction and who sha1Z furaish tha County Eictigineer with "As .Built" plaas and a certificate in Nriting that all improvements ware inst$lled to rhe line9 and grades shoan on the approved coa9tructioa plans and that 4L11, dieturbed monu:aants have been replaced; , S- no construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way uatil :peromit has been issusd by the County Engineer. All work is eub jett to inspactioa and approva by the County Enginaer; E06 all construction wfthin the Public Right of Nay is to be completed prior to filing the f f nal plat or a bond in th= arnount es tiaiated by the County Eqgineer to cover r.1he cost oi coaatruction of improvzmen[s, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monwm9nting the street centerlines shall be filed with rhe Cuunty Engi^.zer. E: 7-no direct eccees from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additional right of ways ere dediceted and roads ere esteblished as County ELoede. . F 8-no direct accese from lota to Stub Road connections until such roads are conetructed to County S[andards and eatablished as County Roeds. ~ 9-roed design, MOM @01~ conetruction, and dreinage control for 1/2 righta of weye and Stub RAad connections are the responeibility of the Developer. E 10-thet the Sponsor shell prepere and eubmit to the Caunty Engineer e deeign proposal accept- eble to the S[a[e Nighway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road inter- eection. State Highwey Departmenr approvel of the propoaed design must be recefved prioi.° to the filing of the final p18t. Improvementa to the State Highway are to be the reepon- sibility of the Sponeor and mey etther he constructed or e bond to cover the cost of such improvements furniehed to the County Engineer in the amount ae determined by [he County Engineer and the Stete HighWay Department. L 11-that all roeds within the plat be curbed and;tilr paved to the specifications of the Coun+ty Engineer. Existing Cotuity roacls providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. ,4~lo pIJWc:r Lo ~ AC4AF1$ s -r ~l•~c~ ~o~ C l 3 10' 14 0D1j~oa4cr RJVI AL4.16 M*vwlEz- . r ~ - AGENDA,, APRZL 28, 1978 T;PxoNE: 456-2274 SPOKANE COIIIVTY P'LANNING COMMISSION ~ Time : Friday, April 28, 1978, 1:30 P.M. Place: County Health Department Auditorium, Room 140 West 1101 College PRELIMIlVARY SIIBDNISION AND 7ANE CLASSIFICATION 9. PE-1190-78, Poochie' s Addi.tion ~ ZE-60-78, AEri cul tural to Singl.e Famil,y Re si dent ial a. Location: Section 15, Township 25 N., Ra.nge 44, E.W.M. Tbe SW 34 and the West 10 feet of the SE 34 of Tract 100 of VERA as recorded in Volume "0'f of plats, page 30 Spokane County, Washington. Except the North 10 feet thereof. Located i.n the NE 14 Section ' 15. b. Sponsor: Northwest Construction Services & Assoc., Inc. Carol Scribner ' E. 9211 Mission Suite G j Spokane, Washington ' c. Engineer: Charles E. Simpson , N. 909 Argonne Rd. Spokane, Washington 99206 ~ d. Site Size: 2.5 Acres ' i ' e. Number of Lots: 8 f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single Family Dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning: Single Family Residential i. Water Source: Vera j. School DistrZCt: Central Valley k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site systems 1. Envi.ronmental Impact: A topic of di scussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal wi1.l have a significant adverse environmental impact. - , ~ ~ v a. ~ F c f MISSIOw AvE.1 ~..,~q. ' _ _ . . . . , . _ ~ IL , n ~1~1T0 J; ~ ~ 'oOO, Q ~ < a . • • N J . A 0 E S M E T A s~+ r p U . . o . . . . . Q f A TAL O CATALOU 17 w > . ~ ` G T. ~ w/ ~ r~ ' 9loke ~i ~ w c, M. ~ W . g AY t• m . -9- ~J~J~NU{"~E~~~.~j2~3 LE~ L'~~ ~~:~IPTI~N L~S I~.15, 1~~8 5~'~~tAN~ C~t1N'~Y ~~~L ~.~~i0~ ~II~E ~ ~'~~C~~ ;~~IC~l~~~~' ~ ~f►~M~B~~t Iv~11~8~~ AS~,E'~SEd ~'~fI~E~ LEGr~~ ~~5~.'~IP~`I~:N ~F FR~~"~R~~f , ~A~PA'~~R { {//ry~~: 4 ~ } 14~ ~55#1-C~4~4 7bt?90ZOt~~6 C "~4I~KL I1~ YER~ PT D~ 8 K 1~' !k F~ ~ , Sq~l ~~[~N~LI~ C~A1'H~~Ihl~ EXC N1~~ ~ 4~1~' S~114 E~(C ~Il~~ ~1 140~ FIA~E~ RQ S P~~KA~IL~ ~I~ 992 T 6 1~~41-~;$~p~ a~65~97~ ~R'VI~I J~i~C~ V~~~A 81~t~ N1~~"fi 0~ ~~CH ~RYII~E ~ ~~~l4 ~5~1/4 ~~~C 8~G ~~C~~c aF ~E11'# TH ~ 3'~ d PT ~QFT ~ ~F ri~~IC~R I~~~4 ~L~I AY~ ~F SE1J4 'H E1OFT TH S~`Q S~. '~F 6LK TH ~1~7~1 TC~ PQt~ ~E?(C ~~~FT SPOKAP~~ 6~A 99Z~3b ~,~541-:~6~7 T5~~7"~~f~2~Z ~ 5~A~GhRLE~f YERA PT t?F 81~04 S~~O~~T I~T~ [~l!'~ ~A'~ ~K - ~,~I'~.J~PT~~~IV1 L ~!~'F H ATP ~N, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Y~ D~Sa I. ~ "~L ~~3.~~T ~ 3 34 ~3i~ ~ M~C~R ~~Y PT o~ ~1~2 3 u~r w F~ ~ E ~ L 554 ~~8~I9 6~ ~ ~JNTY ~i ~ ~ 3 ~5~~ 5 ~ ~J W'~R ~T ~1~4 C~~li~~ SP[~M4~ C~UI~TY ~ ~Iw 4Q~`T 1~~ ~CR~S~ ~P I~ C 2 - _ ~~~K~~~'~ ~~~~:'i I ^ ~ ~F. Y i-~,.,~1~, ~~t~~ C~~tfi~11~~l~Ili~ ~55~r1~~8~0 44Z~~9C ~~RI. ~ BR ~T~7 ° Y~~A @~ Wt~4F~ ~F R- 9~~,~ , ~ ~ f ~tt7r~~~, r~,~:, I N~'E f~~N ~ ~~~~1r•1r.~ / ~ . r~~. k.lV11~ TR x1~0 E~c~ 5I~0~~ 22~-~~94~~D-~ . ~ ~ ' y~~ ~~r~; . - - . I5~41-ti~~l 4+~Z1~9C E~R~ ~f~T~ V~RQ EBC~~' ~Df WZ4bFT ~F - - 5~C ~1~~~M'~I~ , ~ ~Y; 'N11'~ 3t~ 1Ct~ ~~cC S~~~F~ _ ~~1~8C'484~~1 155~►1~~~1~ ~~r17~~C ~~SEPH r!C ~t~~11~~N Y~RA wB~FT ~F N1I~ ~~C I~~~R~fi~ ~ ~ ~~L ~A ~L~~~ ~ 1~'~' 7'~~kT ~ S 1 2 2~-~~ 9~9'~9 ~6 1554~-~:~14 7~~O~Gi75~~B~ ~ F~,t~NNAC~~~ . ~f~~t~ P~N f~~ BLK ~4~ '~~G 5 CO~~ l~TG , ~ ~ ~ ~ OF ~9~SS~'~H dVE 4~Z+~~ ~~`95.3~ E~XC 51~~ 3~4+~'~ ~ ~ 15~~1-~~1b 7~1~~?7+~16~ J V I~IN~1~~~R '~~~A P~'N JF ~'R 1~~ ~A~; C~~~ ~TG ~ ' ~ 1 ~~G A~ ~NTE~cS~C 5 Lt~ ~ISS I~~ AYE ~ I~ L~ EV~~G~E~N RC ~ 031447 fJ ~ T~cl~~ Pa~ T~I ~ 1~~' ~H 1~~9~.34~ TN ~35' ~4~ E~~.~ 4~ TN NiQ3 3' MlL ~ _ . T~l ~~.Y lfi~ QF '~I~SI~I~ AYE ~H ~L~f ALC S~ ~L~ ~i ~79 ' ~41 Tfl . L .5 fi EX~ E~BU' T~~RE~~ l~~a~-~~i~ ~~~o~~a~~~ ~i~~~ ~c~~~ss~~~n ~r~~~ ~~~r~ a~ ca~~ r~~~ o ~3 ~ ~ T~ ~a~ ~ ~~ss~~~ Gv~ s~~} c~~~~~ ~ ~ 15~41-~~81~ 7~1~~7Q16#~ ~V V~ IN~E~ER 'Y~RG~ W9~' ~T~~' ~F C~i~~ ~11'~G ~1l~ ~i~ T►~ LYG ~}F M 5~I AU ' 1 S I ~ ~ ~ ~ S~5 ~31~54 1~5~~-~~~~ 731~~7t~~6~ J ~ l ~ti~~B~~ VE~~d ~~5' ~F ~313.~~' ~F ~~AG~R ~I'EI~~G~ f~ t~ ~ R N RD 1I~ ~ 1'~ 1~~ '~XC ~CY ~~E N 14~+~ ~AM~R t~~ ~P~~,,~P#~ '~A ~9~1~ 1~54,-G~9~~ 7b~40~r~18~ ~COg~ ~ J~~IISO'N VE~A N1~+D~r ~F W11~ ~~L~tELL C~ B1~D1 _ ~44~C 11~ ~ 15~~1-t~~91~ 7~9~8I~ ~ICNA t~ A~34MS ~ER,~ S11~FT i~ll~ 4F A~~Af~S ~RI~I~A~D f~ 1V 1 ~ ~ 61~Q1 N ~304 I~A~~R RD Sp~KANE tiiA ~9~I,6 i _ t~~~~~~~~~ ~~o~~~~~~~ ~~o r~~~~~~~s v~~~ ~~~~.~~~r n~ ~ MC~~.57~T 5~1'2 ~ NtJ~ QF S~ S~~ ~ AC,~ '~~C ~I~~~FT ~1 12~4 I~A~~1~~ R~ ~~~1~~NE W~ ~3~216 ~ ` l ~~~~~se w A ~a~~,~~ v~r~~ a~~~ s~~~.~~►Fr ~uF~~~~~ ~i1. ~ ~ N~93.5~'~i a~ +~3C~~~~' L~F ~lf~ ~ I~11,~ ~F ~T S ~F ~ ADJ ~C4~~275~ , ,~"~l ~ - - , - - * ~ ^ ~ A'~ S i~~'~ C~ ~4 ~~~4~--~~G1~ ~?7~$4C r.,C~y ~I ~f~J~hl~ ~ERA ~101 ~411~ ~X~ IC F ~i ~ M ~C ~i~o~~r ~r~rz ~ ~a~c s~~c~t c~~ w~~~ ~ ~x~ r ~~s~ ~~~v~~ 1~~ ~ ~ - ~~z ~xc ~z~~~ ~~~x~~ ~n _ . s ~~~~L~lo~~ w~~1~►~~ ~ ~ w~~~ ~~r~ s~~~ E,~CR~fi ~R,~~ p I~ Z~i 1~E 1 ~bTl~ ~~~4FT 914~ 1 ~ ~GTHFl~I W~ 11 ~ ~~5~1-~~~+~~ 7'~~8~50CT1 GED~G~ ~ MC IYOR Y~RA N~!'~ ~F ~~M~ ~T~ ~3~~35 . ~,~~.5 Y7~.~ S If ~ ~ 1 ~2 . . ~ ~ ~ ,1 ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ V ~ T I~~~i1~1~Z~J 9~~4T~`1~4 HA~T~~R{3 ~~~A a~4~ 1~~ Slta ~F I N 11~~ ~AI~ER Si~2 ~F 5~1~ ~'R1Q~ ~N66#~Ffi '~F ~~1t~3 N 1~ ~~2 5 E A lb 15~41- 10~~1 g19~~~C J~ S~II TH "~~RA P~' BI4~ E384~T [~F P~~ 1'~T ~E[~ S~l 5P~ rr~'~. , c ' : I 3 12 ~ 14 3 7 S~ N F . I E X w t~ I~~ F T L~ Z~ O F~ Z 11~ 1 ~ ~ 1554~-10~~ 97~'~(~~rB J C MIT~i VE~A P~ B~G~ h~1~~~T PA~ 1~T ~E~ S~'~ SP~ ~ EZ~?~F~' 51/2 0~ 1~ 12+C1~r3 ~ , ~~541-1~2~ Tb~~l ~b'~7 ~~~MN F~~L G S~~I 1PE~~ S 1~~~T Q F h 11 ~ Q~ ~ I~~lUT SAY '~I~ 02 ` ~R ~ ~ 31 2 42'~ ~ / 1~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 1554~-1~~4 1~71c3 C C EG~R V~~A t~~l~ p~ 1~~ ~X~ IEGE t 5132F1' 7~IE~'~~~ ~~~4 145; 2 P~~f E V~ 9 9C T 4 ~ ~ AN ~ ~ ~ ~~o w~~~~~ r 1~~4~-[~~4~ ~7~768$ ~UC~ ~IER~ ,~I4{3 T OF ~34~FT ~F ~l ~ 89~9 t~ I ~~C ~ MAhI~R SP~~~~F 4~A ~~21b 4 ~ ~ ~~c►~~~~ ~ J~+~~~ ~r aF v~~~ s~~~r fl~ ~~~~s rc~~~a~ ~ ~ I~ I25~Z L~F E 15JF1 ~~TN J~ ~~4 ~AF; ~~G ~i'~ P1` ~ N L~ PA~ ~ E 9~i1 t r~R IN~~ DR ~R F " 'N ~~R TL~ SP~ICANE !W~ ~9~+~4► E34FT ~ ~F ~ ~99 54~a~T ~I ~F N~ C~ ~ ~~9, ~ ~ 3~FT S~1F N Lt~ B99 ~~IS~ OF 35u~T ~'fl Pt ZH ~ A~.G L~l PA~ ~ r ~ ~TT Pt !~N YT~R[~~ 1§~3rT h~ ~r ~ LN U~ B~ 1~~ST IlF Pb ~ ~ W~. ~ _ ~ ~ R ~ 15541 ~7~5 ~~14~9~C ~1U~ YE~t~ PT ~7F ~9~ N~l~ ~1~ N ~ T T ~ M R ~ ~~C ~1~~~~ ~ ~1~C S1+~GF1` ~F E~~~?F~ ~ ~1~~ S~ F ~F N1~5F ~F E15G~T ~ I5~ ,~M~ a P~N GF ~99 ~~F~ B~~ A~ P~f f~W L~1 ~'~kf~ ~f~ ~~(~~T ~0 [~F P~ L~I ClF SP~~CAI~~ A 99~'lb S~~U~T ~i ~GR DF ~99 TH ~N ~.~I PAR ~ T 5 ~F ~ ~N ~F L~ I ST ~S~F~ T~ P ~ TN ~ ALG ~N ~'A t~ ~ fl ~ ~ ~~~T l~ ~ ~ ~99 F hl X T ~~~7 16 T ~1' TH ~ ~ 15~#t-~7~D~, ~~D~ObO~~~ E~1~ J MGSES V~~t+~ '~~30' 5~1~ ~F ~~NC~HA~'~S ~dT~ ~ ~~~~1~2 t~r~~ "#R 99 EXC 5~94 ~l~ i5541-~°~'~~ 7~b5~69 ~c A ~iC I~II~IS ~E~A SI~~~T ~F ,~Z~f~'rT ~rU~IP' G~~A~~ ~ 141 h~ ~,I~ E R R C~ 51l~ 0~ TR ~9 ~ P~K~I~€ ~IA 9'9~ 5 9 MI~S~S ~ C4~AR~ ,1 1~5~~-~~"~0~ ~"~~~26~ ~R a i~t~i5 w~~t~4 sil~ I41? M~~1~ ST rr~~~~c~~ ~ ~ ~ SP~~(~~E MIA 9 ~ l~b 1~54~i~~'~iu 9~~+b~°~~ ~~7~1~II~ ~ C,~~~~~r~ V~~,; ~'T G~ ~9~ ~~G ~~FT PRU~ I'N~ . . k F~' ~ - -4 .l'~' :,~I ~y ~F ~EC~'~ T~i ~ T~ ~l ~F CA~VAI ~1~ T~ I~L~' ALG ~A~1 ~ ~15.3 i~ 5 Z ~~1 ~ . ],4~,15F~ ~H f 11~FT P~8 S 1t~'~T d 54~-~ ~ ~~9~r5~C ~ ~ Y~~~ ~T ~F ~~37 ~TA~f '~f(~MPT1 ~~Y C , ~l~I~A~ ~r , W t~~ {~5S ~wA - ~ { f~ e ~T TE~~ '~L r iT~ ~ ~ . ~ 1 ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i~~~~ .~~s v ~ ~~r N ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ 7~`~ 5~4T5~-t 0~ 3~,~ ~YG ~t ~ iR4 ~ ~AL RiW ~t2~~?~T ~ N~~O~T 561~. {~1~1 ~ ~U~3J T~ ~~~;K ~~~~F~~t T~~:~S Lhl E~MT T ~1 ~ PE-1190-78 and ZE-60-78 In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Carolyn M. Scribner, Northurest Construction Services and Assoc., Inc., E. 9211 Mission, Suite G, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Poochies Addition.' Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Single Family Residential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats of such property. The property being platted is described as: The SW 14 and the West 10 feet of the SE 1/4 of Tract 100 of VERA as recorded ln Volume "0" of plats, page 30 Spokane County, Washington. Except the North 10 feet thereof. Located in the NE Y4 of Section 15, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. (In between Mamer Road and Evergreen Road, South of Mission approximately 500 feet.) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) C V& 4~~ , being flrst duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a cttizen of the Untted States of Amerlca, and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the ~161 day of L A-&-D , 19 I personally posted one (1) or more true and forrect copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING In a conspicuous manner at each of the foliowtng locattons, to-wEt: 1. (v tv 2. (Z~aL 3. ~ DATED THIS ~ DAY OF ~ 191 • ~ SIGNED c Subscribed and Sworn to before me this dzY of 19 CC'~ Notary Publtc in and for the State of . Washington, residlng at Spokane, Washingto; ~ ~ ~ ~ 9~, ~ ~~~~a, ~p~~ ~r~~~~io~~: s~~ cau~r~~ ~~~~r~~ ~t~2~s~~a~ Q ~~~~i ~Y'1~C.~~~ fl~Y'~.~ ~~f`~1 ~ ~al'1~ Pla~e : ~ouz~~y ~~~th ~e~arti~ent Au~i~v~• i urn, ~t~t~m 'I ~+U ~ W~st 11 [7~ ~oll~ge ► P~LII~iNAR~ ~13B~TVIST~I~ AN~ ZC►~!~ ~I,A~SI~'~CATI~N ~ 1~~-~ ~~~U~ ~t~O~C~d1~ ~ ~ ~i~t~,1~10~t ~ ~-7 , ~rie~tural t~ ~i~le.9 Family ~es~~~a~tial L~cat~t~~.: Sectic~n ~1~, rt'c~wnshig~ I~f, Aan~~ ~+4, ~,W.M. ~h~ 5W ~.t7d t~i~ West '10 fe~t ~f the SE ~'ract af' UEkA a~ r~cprded i~a '~olum~ ~r~'► plats, gag~ 3t~ S~okan~ ~o~nty, W~~hin~~on. Ex~ep~ ttae t~t~~th 10 f~et tt~er•eof, Loca~ed in ~he t~E 5e~:~i.an ~ b. ~Sgor►,~~ r: Nor~;h+~e s~ ~~ns~ruc ti Qn Servi s& A~~~.~ Ir~c . ~~~1 ~~~~.bn~r E. ~~11 N~~ ~si~r~ Suite G Spak~.i~e, 4~~.s~~~,A,~t0I1 c~ En~in~~r•: Chax•1e~ E. ~imp~on N, 9U9 Ar;gor~ie Rd. S~okan~, W~.~hing~~~ A ~lt.~ +~L'L+12: ~r~ ~1~.`T'~.'S ~11I11~]~~` 0~ ~C7~G~: ~j ~ ~an~ us~ propos~e~ t~y ~~,~n~~r: S~.n;~1e Fami:ly D+~~~].in,~s ~ ~xistin~ 7anit~~: Agri~ultur~ ~7. Pr~~ro~~ed Zc~~iia~. Sir~~le ~'~i1~r R~esid~ntial 'W~~er Sca~~rc~: 1,`~ra - ~ . Sc~~o~1 Distr~i ~t : C~~tra.~. ~'~lley k. M~t~~d c~f ~~~a~~ ~i~p~s~l ; Individua~. ~z~-si~e ~s~~te~s 1. ~nvi ~onrri~n~a1 Imp~ct : A t~~i c o f di scuss~ r~~ at trc i~ he~:rin~ ~ray b~ wh~ ~h~r ~ n~~ ~hi~ pro~,~s~.l will ha~r~ ~~~.~nifi~cartt ~dv~rse er~v~r~nment~]. imp~.~~. - ~ ~ _ r - ~ ~ ~~SSI~~N ,~V''~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~«T a ~ ~ ~ ; ~~l~t~' ~ f1A~t W o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~lW1 ~ T ~ ~n t u ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ 'Ai'p,L u ~AT~,Ls~~L~ I~ ~I ~ ~s:r• - p~ ~ tiiAi ILL7~y' C- T, ~ iV 4 ~ ~ ~ 6 a ~ kl #n, ~ ° ~ ~ w y ~ av r~ ~ a~ A . . 4'" 1__ ! 5~ak~ne C;~unty r"I~nning u~~rntrerl~ ~o~~ e~e~r~Ha, I ~ J ~f"U ` S POiCANE COUNTY HEALTH QISTRI C7 Inter-Offi ce Communi cativn ~ Date; Aarch 22, 1978 . ~TQ : . Svokane Count Planning Commis FROM: Scott Fink, . S. and Eugene . 4r tR. S. SU$JEC7: Proposed preliminary R1at - PDOCHIES ADDI'FION ~ ~ 1. Ref erentes: a. Map af subject, scale 1" = 50' by Charles Simpson; undated, received by this office February 21, 1978, b. Groundwater Resaurees and Rela4ted Gealagy North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Cvunties of Washingtan, Departmerrt of Wate-rRe- sources, State of Washingtan, 1969. c. The Effect af Applied Surface Waters Qn Groundwater Quality in the Spokane Valley, D. K. Todd, ~ection 20$, WateF R6sources Study - Metro- politan Spokane Region, U, S. Amy Corps of Engineers Seattle Uistrict, Agril 7, 1975. d, Soil Survey, Spokane Count~, Washington, 5oil Conservatiori Service, [T,S,D.A.* 14arch, 1968. e, §,pok.ane Count~, Washingtan Engineering Interpretations, Soi1 Conserva-- ~~on Se1~ice, j.J.S.D.Ar, Augu$tA 19I4. f. I.ngs of 10 private and public wells in Townsh3.p 25, Range 44. g. Field Survey Report, Scatt Fink, Spokane County Hea1th District,, Marcb 17} 1978. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Topvgraphy, sails and water. A. This project lies in a relatirrely f lat area between Oppnrtunity and Vera. Local draiaage ways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aqutfer. b, Surface soils are c1assed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5% slapes. They have a septic tank filter £ie1d limitation of slight with passiUle ~ contamination of groundwater. c. Geolagical1y the svils are g1SCiOfluVial depositss stream-laid sand and gra~el; cantains snrne houlders in places; includes some undif ferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geolagic structures yfeld moderate to very 1arge ainounts of water. 0 c~. The data fram 2 I~r~.n T~1ater ~3istrict wells 3n the area shot~s the wells are 73 to 17~0 feet deep az~d have stati~c water 1evels varytng frnm ~+l ~ to ~.40 f eet bela~a the surfaee. T~re highest total nitrc~ger~ leve1 was r~ SCHD-ApM-l 18 I L . . . POOCHIE'S ADDITION Page 2 March 22, 1978 1.81 ppm. The Vera Water and Power District has indicated that it , can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agree- ments with the developer. , 3. Impact discussion. a. The plat sponsor has proposed 8 lots on 2.5 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the im- pact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. ~I ! b. In the course of the conduct of the Armq Corps study, Dr. Todd con- sidered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: ' (1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) Al1 dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. ~ i (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater ' flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol- ' ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."---"The analytical results of the forecast impact of qear 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a sub- stantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range 0.82 to 1.81 ppm. A projected incre- mental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges 0.89 ppm. to 1.96 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment ; and perhaps more to obtain a perrnit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. ~ ' ~ POOCHIE'S ADDITION Page 3 March 22, 1978 (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as la- goons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. 4. Recommend that: a. A public water sqstem including fire flows serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. b. Each lot be authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage system. . c. An Qn-site sewage management system be created and approved by this off ice prior to the signing of thE final plat if more than a total of eight(8) dwelling units are authorized withfn the plat. cc: Clarence Simpson Engineers, Inc. North 909 Argonne Road Spokane, Washington 99206 R E C E I V E MAR 281970 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ , , ' ~et> ,:r•. ~t . ~ - gi, ~ . " ~,~;~~''y,~~' ~ ~~~'~~'A~;~~~ a~ >tti1• tn d .w.~i~ { • . , . Director ission plannin~3CountY planning ~°mm gpokane Je fferson North Sllwashinqton 99201 Spokaner T ~ A P,E' lies ear S ir ~ the above subdiV is ion D District . that Power roviding tter is ta verl and Vera Water ~e S~divis ion p rules Thls ~'e boundaries the abo . Io1icies ► wi~in our ower and water ~ith tthe DistrlCt s p , can SuPply lieS the developer comP and requlations. Sincerelyt ~ , J ob y,7illitari Mana~3er Ass is clb #132 ' . # 9 50 .,77 , ' Dic~ ~impson i cc: cc: Developex, E C E E FEB 2 2 1978 SPOKANE CdUNTY T . PLANNING DEPARjMEN ry . , ~ February 13, 1978 uera Water & Power N. 601 Evergreen Rd. ' Spakane, WA -09216 t;entl emen : Attached is a preliminary ptat map of a proposeci development of 8 1 ots on the eas t s i de Qf Mamer Road svuth of 11-i ss i on Avenue. Vtould you please direct a letter to Mr. Bah Eetharls, SRokane County Plaening, N. E11 Jefferson, with a copy to this office renarding the feasibility of Vera Water F~ ?ower nravidina service to this development. Thank you very much. Sincerely yours, Carol Scribner Enclosure cc: Mr. Bab Bethards J. Pat J'Nei 1 l, Real tor CS/lw R E C E I V E FtQ 17 1973 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ ~ February 13, 1978 Mr. Euaene Prather Environmental Health Spokane County Health DistricL W. 1101 Coliege Spokane, WA 99201 Dear Mr. Prather: Attached is a preliminary plat map of a proposed development of 8 lots east of Mamer Road and South of Mission in the Spokane Valley. Would you please direct a letter to Mr. Bob Sethards, Spokane County Planning, N. 811 Jefferson, with a copy to this office regarding the feasibility of on site indlvidual septlc tank systems for this development. Thank you very much. Sincerely yours, Carol Scribner Enclosure cc: Mlr. 6ob Bethards J. Pat Q'Neill, Realtor CS/lw R E C E I V E FEt3 1 71978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNlNG DEPARTMENT I CLARENCE E. SIMPSON RICHARD L. SIMPSON CHARLES E. SIMPSON Ularence C.. simpJon engineerj'q Ac. CIVIL ENGINEERS RiVD LAND SURVEYORS R@g1J1CYCGI f/l Wcttbtn`qton and Idabo TELEPHONE 926-1322 OFFICE N. 909 ARGONNE RD., SPOKANE, WASH. 99206 January 26, 1978 R ECE III E PRELIMINARY PLAT FEg 2 1 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMEIVT LECrAL DESCRIPTION The SW and the West 10 feet of the SE ~ of Tract 100 . of VERA as recorded in Volume "0" of plats, page 30 Spokane County, Washington. Except the North 10 feet thereof. Located in the NE 4 Section 15, T. 25 N. , R. 44 E. W. M. C Charles E. Simpson V , S E. S t~~!~~00F bdqs~ V~~G9~ Q~ O~i ti ! M° A / G/STER~ ()NAL ~ ~ . c ~ E X H I 13 I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM AREA AND DISTANCE ■oooooooaooooo00oooooaooooaooooo000000000t~~'~gg§d"c~..FoDOOOOOo Epq RT~~~~ ~ Total ainount of land ln this Subdivision: 2.5 Acres Proposed densi.ty of the PIaF: a'15 • Lots/Gross Acre • '.I'otal amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: None Acres Proposed use of controlled adjoining land: - Wriat is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire statlon? 1 3/4 Shopping facilities? 4 ml. Municipal I3oundary: 6 mi. Paved street or highway? Mamer road is paved LAND USE ■ooooo00000000000000000oooooaoooooavoo(3oooaoooooooooaoooooooooaooooo00 Indicatc the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwella.ngs ( X). Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi-i'arnily dwelling un1ts ( Indicate which `Lots: MoUile HomeS ( Other ( Descrlbe other uaes: Descrlbe an,y non-residential use proposed ln the Plat: What is the present use of the pr•operty proposed to 'ue platted? vacant untilled land List type of uses: Cvltlvated land: acres. Pasture:. acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres I s keeping of animals desired? No ( X Yes ( Type : household s onl v . IMPROVEMENTS •ooooo000000000000000000000000oooooaooooooooaooooo00000000000oooo❑a Do you plan to flle the Plat in its ent;lr•ety as proposed, or- will tt be a multi-phase dev- elopment? in its entirety , To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( I`linimurno Curb anci Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( X Descrl.bo any combinatlons of above: What is the time period expect;ed for complete development o£ the Plat: 5 months Street •_mprovements completed? 5 months • Substantia1 number of lots occupled? 6 months Is dedio.ation of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( X Yes ( Describe: , Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 800 - 1000 Square feet Number of bedrooms ? - .1 - Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( Yes ( X). Will any special deed restrictions be included a.n tpe sale of lots? No ( Yes ( X If "yes", explain: CQVenants as reouired bv FHA UTILITIES ■E3OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOON3D000 Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank k X). Lagoon ( Treatment plant ( Other, or -combinations (Describe) ~ Indicate the proposed source of water supPly: Indlvidual wells ( Public sy'stem ( X). Private community system ( Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements ( X). Overhead utility easements ( Utilities in streets ( ) . No easements ' Indicate the distance from this proposal to the.nearest existing water maln: 35 feet. ' Indicate size of nearest main: 6 Inches. List utility companies or districts expected to provlde service to this Plat: Electricity: Vera Gas: WWP Water: Vera Phone: PdC. NW Bell ► . y ' J f ~ E X H I B I T A Page 2 PRELIMINARY PLA`1' APPL:LCAZ'ION FORM (Continued) ACKNOWLEDGNiENTS M00000000000000000000oooooaooooo00000000000000000000000000oooooc PROPOSED PLAT NAME: Poochie's Addition I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has heen prepared~by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. E. SO~A 4F WAS~y~~, s (Signed) (2)ZLA,& Date : 2-,IC,/7 F3 J 1 ~9f ~ s) ~ N .;9J9-Aroonne Phone : : g?6-1322 v y (Addres . . 4.~ _ . J~4 9967? 'X 0 .41 Spokane, WA Zlp; 99206 IsTE~~° ONAL . s~tr~ -{~~L : - please print , I~ ~~(d i,~ the sponsor of this proposed subdivision, am the ' (owner C); builder ( agent ( x); option holder ( contract holder C of the property proposed to be platted and have completed the information requested of ine and do hereby testify that it is corre and accurate. • (Si Date : lo .7 (Address) E. 9211 Mission Suite G Phone: 922-1705 Spokane, WA Zip: 99206 NOTARY Date : Z ~ G ~'i ~ NOTARY SEAL : Special Comments: •OOa000a00oo0000000■ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 6=00OC300000000000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT INFORMATION , Date Submitted: Checked by: , School District: ~v ?-q,e~ Preliminary Plat Fee: 32.~ , . ~ - Existing Zoning: A~ M..'" Date established: Zone Change File No.: Adverti sed Zone Upgrading : Number of Lots: Location: Section Township ZS Range 4L Plat File No. : p~-' V l ~ ' Plat Name : PaD~e~ ~ 4 ~ R E C E I V E FEC3 2 1 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT • , ~ D71 SPOKANC GOVntr COUltT NOU3[ ENVIRONMENTAI, CHECKLIST Introducti.on: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies fnvolved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer khe following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts wfll result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the deqree of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional paqes, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answars you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for evenV "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist, The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of WashingCon for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: N6rthfarst`t (:nnStructi on Serv1 C2S & ASSOC InC. 2. Address and Phona Number of Proponent: F. q211 Mission Sui te Q , 922-1705 3. DatE Checklist Submitted: 1-114 - -,Z .eil 7 9 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: pokane Countv, Wa. 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: Poochie's Addition , - 1 - ~ ~ F-SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P=C.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) _ ~ r ► 6, Nature a~nd Brie£ De;scription of the Proposal (including but not li,m,.~ed to its size, ~ general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurOte unde,,r- • s tand ing of i t s s co;pe and na ture) : P1 at vaca-nt. _l,a~,nd,-An resi de.nti al area i nto 8_i ndi Odual _ resiTdenti_al, z lots., - - t . . ~ 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposa,l, as well as the extent of ~the la,ri,d area affected by any envfronmental impacts, including any otbe'r- • information need.ed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): . Proposal i s ~l ocated South of Mi ss i on Avenue a We,st of Ever4reen . Roa,d a_nd ts_ __a_.,po,rti on of Tract 100 of Ver-a._ Prooosal access_ _ro,&dL.,. - - i s off Nla~mer. _ - - - - , ~ • k . ~ , 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: • ° _ J!1l1e,.,~Q r 1978 . ; 9. List of all Permit,s, Licenses or Government Approvals Requfred for the Proposal ' (federal, state and local - including rezones): , - . :tv.' - Rerwitq, - , - r_oy . 10a . Do Ygu; or the ~owner in the event you do not own the sub j ect land, haue any : pla,ns for ,fut',~r-e additions, expanslon, or further activity rc:lated to or con- ' • neeted with stAls proposal ? If yes, explain: ~ ~ No ~ ~ 1~Ob, Do you ow,n or_have optlons on land nearby or adjacent to thls proposal's locattto,n ? If yess, explain: Residence to South of proposal is listed for sale by proponent. - 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or rnearby? It yes, explain: NO , , i- 12. Artach any oth,er application form that has been compl_eted regardxng the prcpos,a.l,; ; if'none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, . . 1describe the na{ture of such applicatian form: _ffiA Feas i bi li tw- studv for FHA approval of su,bdi vi si on . ~ . - ENVIRON'ME;NTAL IM,PACTS , x~planat-ion-s -of alls "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No Zarth, ,-W~ill the proposal result in: (a) Unstable e3arth conditions or in changes in geologic = s'tructures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - - - (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering . _ . o,f the soil? X _ _ „ - - , 'Y ~ } • • • • • • • • • • • ~ • • • • • • ~ ' 2 t+~•`4 r ~ (IF $PACE FQR EXPLANATION I5 INADEQUATE, PI.EASE ATTACH ALIdU~ONAL FAGES«) Yes May,b e - N•o -y 1 (c) Change in topography or groxnd surface relfef features?. . _ ` (d) The destructiari,, covering or modification of any uniqUe geolagic or physical features? , . . . . . . . , Y+ _ - }i (E) plny iYLCre$'Se in W'iT'1d OT' WdtET` erQSlOt7 Qf 5o1l5 r~~ther }~~y /~r ~a F 1y/µ4 Y{yl VL 41~i }p .7 ~Le ~ • rt • f ■ . i . • ! ! ■ ■ r r ./...5. .i , +i • - 1ri1 .x~ "a Changes in d'epvsftion or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltatian, ~deposition or eros~ian whfch maY , modify the channel o# a river or stream or the bed of Ghe ocean or any bay, ,fnlet or lake? . . . . . . * - . i ~ ~ ~ ` „ . ' , ' n ' E~la~a~i~ra: rnad ' 17 ~qtahZ,i_,-hed tn.~_se-ry1c the 1 ats. ..dr-ai na°p.e ',-v~-,1s1` , , _ be estab'l.i-shed ta meet Gaun, t,y FHA; re,q4,i rerRe n ts, Al 1 changes wi17 ;be.im;iner :-to -repare , area far construc~ti.on=t6f<aresi,d,enti 61 hames. , . _ . v ..F . _ ' 4 _ • . Yaa Ma~4,he x,,Ug 2, Air,, Will the proposal result in; (a) Air emissions or deteriar"atibn af ambidnt air quality? . (b) like crea11Vn Vf oFJje44~~~~~le ok.{a1s ? . • • . ■ • . -yi► {c_) Alteratian of air movement, m:vigturd or t6mperatixre, - - ~ or any change iri climate f either locally or regionally? A ~L • ' - - l- . ' ` ~J~k .~~~~anat~on. ~4ddi ti or~al cars wi~l Z be in the area but effect wi 1 l be`;" ` . - , ~ E11 inl ma7 - + - r _ r kn _ • _ ti y , ' i - :n~ °3 . VIl'ater. V~Ia,ll. the proposal result tr~; Yes Mqyb~` } Z * r F~ ? T ` „ A - _ (a) Change in currents, or the co,urs'eor;direetion of • , : ~ - water rnavements , in e,ither ma._r.f~iie, o~ f~e sh wa ters ? . . . ' ~ . - (b) Changes in absoa`ption rat'es,dra,tnage-pattems, or ~ F the rate and amount af sdrface -waker ruriaff? . , , . . . . ~ . (c) Alterations to the caurse or flow of fl'vvd waters? -X. (d) Change in the z~rnount of surface water in any warer x bady? i • • i • • . • i • • . • aF i ■ i • (e) D:scharg° into surface waters, or in ainp alteratfon af surfa~e water qua,lit~i, inchudiTici'bUt not limited _ to te mperature , dissolved 4xycJen vr tur~idt~~r? , (f) A°lteratian of the direction or rate of flaw of ground YMateLs. . a * i e • i . • i . • . ■ i • a ! i t (9) Change in the quankiky of ground waters, either through di'rect additions or withdrawals, or through interception of ari aquifer by auts or excavatis2ns i . . . ~ . . . . _ - - (h,~ L)eterloratiari in`ground waher qxjalftyr either through direct injectivnF or th,rough_ the~ ~~~e-paga af ].eachate, r phospa Ces . detergents r wa~erbarne vi-rus or bacteria, , „ _ - or other ~ubstanc;es inta the ground, waters? x ` (t) Reduetion in the amount of waker otherwise aveLilable - ' for Aublic water supPlies? , . . . , . . . . . . . . • - f ° r' Ex~lanat~on z Alterati ons in surface & water drainap Wi 1 Z occur. ..but wi 17,=' - be in canformance. to Spokane County- &FHA requ i rements,.~A homes wi lT-be~ erected wi th normal ex.cavati an ,and i ndi vi dual septi c tank sLstems.,. ~ . . . . _ ~ ~ - . . ' ' F M1 y ! t A_ ' ' ti . • ` i r ~ 3 ~ • I y p } 5 - 1 .a.r ~`'Y '~~.a_.~'.e`a~ .lx.~.x~ - . . S1' ...r . ~ a__.s-r=..s_ _ . : _ . .'3~_." ~.+i x! = w ~ _ . .L-:i'.~~~ n ~b ~ .i _ rS 'i - , 6IF-,9iPACE F4R E}CPLAIVATIOPV IS I1VAi7EQUATX, PLEASE ATTAOff ADDTTIONAL PAGES ~ ~ • , Yes ~~~afte, No 4, FIora, Wi1l the proposal res-ult in: ' ! ~ _ - -r - (a) Change-in-,.dic diAversity of sgecies, or numbers af any speci.esF-.~f Bor.a (includ#ng trees, shrubs;, grass, Y ~ ~ f k crops, mioro_f1ora and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . , - y - (b) Reductton of th-e nurnb, er-s~.bf any u:iique', ra're or en4:iCZngitred M1SPet1e'Jti0~jT,6li4'{ ■ ■ ■ w a ♦ • • r • a • ~ J ~ F - (c) InVrodixekl ~n,' of n6vv specf es of florc~ into ~an area, , - or in a- bdrrier~ to the norrnal reple-nishment ❑f , pV+..7 C L~i,~~ f-~4 :7 e+F,}oy~iies ? V • # - . • i ■ r a a . • • • • ~f 4r111^ • S'` t (d) ReduoC~6n,` in acreage af any agricultural crop ? . . . . . ~ ~ . x . •Ex~~ariation: , Residences wi 11 be Zandscaped with grass and shru~s comman ~ r~ • R i:hE arP21 • ' F r - T ' ^ ~ _ t rr'--. ' • _ ~ r. ixL~. ~ _ _ _ _ ~ F • - _ ~",1 F* ` 4- !Y _ . . , Y~.' s M ~ V b~' N~~ 5. Fauna. Will tne;`proposal re sult in: t#~ (a) Chartges in the divexsft~r of specips, or nurnbers of ~ "fauna (jpfrds, land anirr~als Including reprt1l~~ ; ; fi~h-land s~iell~fish, benthic organisms, insects` or:-m;i.crofauna)? , , . . . . . . , , . . . . x w 0 (b) Reductfo~t- th@, mumbers of arty u-nique, rare, o.r - endangered species of fauna? . , . . . . . . • • . x ' (c) tntroductivn, of new species of fauna int❑ an areal ar ~ result in a ~aarrier to the mxgratian or rrtovement af fauna? . ~ o- ~ . (d) DeterioratiQn of exi$ting fish or wi2dlife habitat? ~ - ~ Ekplanation; Ground animal s and bi rds wi T 1 no daubt rel ocate, ~r- - - .~...v _ . . _ . YES M;~Y~~ IVO r, 6. N,oise . ~1Vili the proposal increase existing r~oise levels ? . . . x Ex2}anation: A,ddition_a.l cars and peopl e waul d be in . the area but i ncrease would be pnly as i snormal for residenta al area. ~ , j~e'~~v 7 x~{ y ay-'~e No . -1I 7, Liqht and, Glare f Will the proposal produce new light ar gl.are? ~~''~Y ~ -Explanation: _ Add%t~~' ~~na1 ~ars and h~useh~l.d li~hts wauld he in the area. , - ~ , . , + Ye5 MaYbe No . ~ ~F ; - Larid Use: vV'ilI the, proposal result in Lfie alteration of the vF k?' ; r 4i~1 41 1 ~~7~1rL`L r I? ~~a~Ll;rd lGii~id ~1~7e VL r1Ja ~ ■ ■ i i ~ • • • x ~ ~ k'P ~ , . ~ . ~r ~.4`14~ 5$}~tl;r S~ r r ~ ~ a ' E r4Fti _ ' f~.~~ ~ su• . -2.t-1r:5'.. , f ~ , _ _ • ~hY 5 n 4 ~ r ~ , _ .z,r 4 ' - ' • - ,'+~I ' A- - ~+~e+~~~1. ra'+F'.~q,'~►,ya~e• ` , (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION:-I6 INADEQUATE, PI,EASE ATTACR ADDITIONAL FAGES.) Xes Mt►vbe, No 9. Natural Resources.- Wi11 the proposal result Yn: (a) Increase in ttie rate of use of any na tural resources X (b) Depletion of ~any nonrenewable natural resource? X-~ Explanation: Area wou1 d need e,l ectri cal servi ce and water suppl'y. ' Yes M~~~~ ~1 ~ - 1~0. Rask of Uoset, Does the proposal involve a i-i~sk of an explosion or the release of fiazardous substances, (including, but not limited to, oil, pesCicide,s, chernicals, or radiation) in the event of an accide,nt or upset c~onditions ~ Ex,planation: - - Yes IVlaybe No 11, PopulatLOn, Will the ,proposal alter, the location, . distribution, density, or growth rate of the human • ' population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y r,Explanation: Addi ti onal peool e woul d 1 i ve i n the proposed area. 12. Housin,q. Wtll the proposal affect e.xisting housing, or X _ create a dEmand for additional housi_ng? . . . . . . • ~ --Expl~natiori: Proposa,' wi 1' 1 hel p to rneet the exi sti ng need for - residential housing.' ~ Yes Maybe Na 13. Transportation/Circulation. Wi11 the proposal result in: .,,,1 - (a) Generation of, additional vehicular movement? . . . . . x (b) Effects on exis-ting parking faciti,ties, or demand for X new parking? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Impact upon e;xisting transportation systems? . . . . . -~r t (d) Alterations to p,resent patterns of circulation or X movement• of people and/or goods . . . . . . . • • - (e) Alterations to vaater-borne, rail or air traffic? ~ (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X • bicyclzsts or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . • • • Explanatfon: Resial ts of oroposal woruld _be_ only those normal for servi cing 8 additional sFinple familv resi'dential units. -5- ~ i 1~' _ ~ ,1 Y. ^ " .c.s ~J..~ ^ ~ ~a~+.~?4.t.~ ~,yi-~C.. ' - ^ ~ "..'LI~~~V'~i.V...=e.- : -R . ` -i ' "..t~ r_ n_ _ _ _ _ • _ ' _ _ _ ~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLIINATION IS INADEQUATE, PI EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,) Yes M~~ybc IVo 14. Public Services. Wi11 the pcoposal h,~ve an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altcred qovernmental services in any of the following areas ? (a) Fire protection ? . . , . . , , . . . , . , . , , X ~ (b) Police protection? , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , _,X + (c) Schools ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . , , . . , . , X , (e) Maintenance of public facilities, includinq roads? X ` (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . X £xplanation: Government services as stated above would be needed to service the proposed area. Yes Maybe No 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Explanation: _fMrav will be re4uired to service the homes to be constructed 4n-.-t1a p.Tn, rop.n c Pd p1 a t. Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ---L ~ (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: The above svstems will be needed to service the 8 residentialunits to be constructed on the proposed area. Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health razard (excluding mental health) ? „ . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . x. Explanation: -fi - - . . . . ' . " _ _ '-t'..-_ 'a_ j. / • • ~ V' • (IF IOJPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P.~.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 18. Acsthetics, tiVi1T the proposal resulh in the obstruction of ~~ny scenic v1sta or view open to the p.abl,ic, or wzll the pro- posal result in the creation of an aESthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X- Explanation : YPS Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing re,creational opportunities X ; Explanalion: , E - - _ i i 1'es Maybe No " 20. ArGheoloqical/Historical o'W~11 the pr-oposal result in an alteration of a signiticant archeol9gicc.1 or historical site, s tructure , object or building? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ExpTanation: ; III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear und,er the~ pe-nalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to thE best of my knowledg°ev,, I also understand that, should there be any wLllful misrepresEntation or willful l6ck•o4 1;ull;d"isclosure on my part, Spokane C'ounty may wtthdraw any declaration of nonsignificance that it rnight issue tn reliance upon this c'hecklist4 , Da te : 7 8'/ ProponEn _ . ~ ~ • J (Please Print or Type) PrQp9nent: ~Lt-Wc.,c,a.-P- T ~ Address: P hon e : Pe`rson completing form: Carolyn M. Scri bner Pl-ione: 922-1705 ; pate: 2/1/78 ~ a Dept. or Office of County Reviewing C'hecklist: - 'S'ta(ff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: ~ I7 I T 1 ' . - 7 - i .'~'=c~~~~-~~. _ _ -...i~._ _ .`"t}': - ~ -#.-~r.f _ ..-.«~i }~~i~t~#r__...,.~i~~etid~~"~`<,..y4r._ .-c: c^xa'"'~'?~'~ ,~~~r.~ 1