Agenda 06/24/2004 SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
Council Chambers - City Hall 11707 E. Sprague Avenue
6:30 p.m.-9:30 p.m.
* * * June 24, 2004 * * *
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• June 10, 2004—not available
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT
VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS
New Business:
• Briefing on upcoming code revisions:
1. Administrative Variance/Administrative Exception
2. Dimensional Standards
3. Clearview Triangle
4. Interim Zoning (UR-1)
• Discussion of Comprehensive Plan Economic Development Chapter Draft
X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
XI. ADJOURNMENT
COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF
Fred Beaulac Marina Sukup, AICP
Robert Blum Greg McCormick, AICP
John G. Carroll Scott Kuhta, AICP
David Crosby Debi Alley
William Gothmann, Chair
Gail Kogle
Ian Robertson, Vice-Chair www.spokanevallev.orq
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Commission Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2004 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
® information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed ordinance Amending Ordinance 03-053 relating to
Administrative Exceptions and Administrative Variances.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70, Spokane Valley Ordinance 03-53
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council was briefed on interim development
regulations requiring review on April 6, 2004.
BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan pursuant
to Ordinance No. 03-52, subsequently adopting the Zoning Code of Spokane County as interim
development regulations for the new city (Ordinance 03-53). Included in the latter was a new
section (14.404.090 Administrative Variances) which ostensibly granted additional discretion for
administrative approvals to building setback, height and lot area requirements. Unfortunately,
"variances" are narrowly defined in both state law and the Interim Development Regulations and
require notice to adjacent property owners and a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner,
effectively precluding administrative approvals. This discrepancy is resolved by amending
Section 14.506 Administrative Exception to include the provisions originally addressed in
14.404.090 Administrative Variance and repealing that provision.
In reviewing Chapter 14.506 Administrative Exception provisions relating to "Arterial/Overlay
Zones" and "Future Acquisition areas" are obsolete. These provisions are deleted but intent
was preserved in a new subsection 10 in 14.506.020 which identifies Administrative Exceptions
as also applicable to improved properties adversely impacted by voluntary dedication of rights-
of-way, eminent domain proceedings or purchase of right-of-way by the City, County, State or
Federal agency.
A determination of Non-Significance was issued on May 6, 2004 and a draft proposal was
submitted to CTED and other agencies for their review on May 10, 2004. A public hearing will
be held before the Planning Commission prior to any consideration by the City Council.
A Public Hearing is scheduled for July 22, 2004.
OPTIONS: Not applicable.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Information only. No action required. .
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS: Draft ordinance.
Spa�kan�
.Malley
ADMINISTRATIVE EXCEPTIONS &
ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES
Community Development Department
July 8,2004
Background
• City Council was briefed on Development Regulation
policy issues on April 6,2004,and provided direction
concerning the intent of the provisions included in
Ordinance No.05-53
• SEPA analysis was completed on April 26,2004 and a
Determination of Non-Significance issued
Proposed Amendments
• The provisions of Section 14.404.090 adopted by City
Council have been incorporated into the amended
requirements of Section 14.506 and 14.404.090
repealed
• In addition obsolete provisions relating to"Future
Acquisition Areas'were deleted. Added were provisions
which allow consideration of Administrative Exception on
improved property rendered non-conforming as a result
of right-of-way acquisition by voluntary dedication,
purchase or condemnation
Next Steps
• A Public Hearing is scheduled before the Planning
Commission on June 22,2004
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.04-0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY,WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ORDINANCE 03-053 INTERIM DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
RELATING TO ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES AND EXCEPTIONS; PROVIDING
EOR SEVERABILITY AND EFI+'p:CTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City of Spokane Valley Ordinance No:03-053 adopted the Spokane County
Zoning Code as Interim Development Regulations pursuant to the requirements of RCW Chap. 36.70A;
and =
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the,City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Chapter 14.506 of the Spokane Valley Interium Development Regulations is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"Chapter 14.506 ADMINISTRATIVE.EXCEPTION
14.506.000 Intent
•
The Community Development Director may approve minor deviations to requirements for
setbacks, lot coverage, rri mmum lot size and building height where the strict application of
Whenever lie Department determines that a requested deviation from standards of this Code is
found unreasonably detrimental to the development of the property and the interests of the
property owner, qualifies as an exception set forth in 11.506.020subject to 14.605.030,Approval
Criteria .. !- .. ... .., - . .. - - - . - - - _ - - :.
. .. . .. . _ .. ... ..... . - . - . . .. ' .... .. `: - - •- ' -- �
14.506.020 Allowed Exceptions
Exceptions may be considered only when they involve any of the following circumstances.
1. Any dimensional requirement which does not exceed one(1)foot.
2. Under the following conditions:
a. A parcel established prior to March 31,2003 that does not meet the buildable square footage
requirements for a parcel in a particular zoning district;or
b. A legally non-conforming dwelling with respect to setbacks,height and size which otherwise
could not be expanded or reconstructed;or
c. A duplex constructed prior to March 31,2003 that does not meet the minimum parcel size,which
could not otherwise be reconstructed.
3. Yard setback requirements where the deviation is for ten-twenty-five percent(1825%)or less of the
required yard.
4. Building height requirements where the deviation is for twenty-five tcn percent(2518%)or less of
the maximum building height.
5. Minimum lot area requirements where the deviation is fortwenty five percent(25%)or less of the
required lot area.
6. Maximum building coverage requirements where the variance deviation is for twenty five percent
(25%)or less of the maximum building coverage.
67. Lot frontage and/or width under the following circumstances:•
a. Lot frontage and/or width requirements where the deviation is'for ten percent(10%)or less than
the required lot frontage.<•: c .
_. . ... • ... .. _ e, .. . _ '.' .. ..
be. Lot frontage and/or width requirements where the deviation is greater than that listed in
14.506:020(&7a)( }provided that the Department .... .. . .• - . -•-• • •-• •
. - - .. -:; .. . ... .. ! ... ... - -• may inane require
circulation to affected agencies andmaresulting in conditions of approval.
78. Up to one-half(1/2)-of a-private tower's "impact area" off of the applicant's property.
g9. Flanking Street Yard setbacks,provided that:
a. At the time the subject parcel was legally created the property was zoned under a zoning
classification of the pre-January 1, 1991 Spokane County Zoning Ordinance,and subsequently on
January 1, 1991 a new zoning classification from the Zoning Code of Spokane,Washington was
assigned to the subject property; and
b. Any Flanking Yard Setback deviation granted under this section shall not exceed the required
Flanking Street setback standards of the pre-January 1, 1991 Zoning classification of the subject
property.
10. Any improved property rendered non-conforming through voluntary dedication of right-of-way,the
exercise of eminent domain proceedings or purchase of right-of-way by the City,the County or State or
Federal agency.
910. A roadway alignment of an arterial or road shown on the official Arterial/Road map which does
•
•_ - - j0. - ,• -.. .., •-. • - •. ; • • ... - .. _. .
Engincor.
!. -- .. . ... ...•
,.... ! -- .. .. . ... .- . -- '. ! • .. - . .
- • • • - •- -... • .
•
• -- .•• - .• - • • -. .. .. .. -0. . . . '. I. !! . - . ,.
- - - - _ -_ _ .. !! „ . . . ... ... -
n _ ... . • . ,. .
" • _" . * !
•
• - - --
parking stalls;and(d)a"Title notice" is recorded pursuant 11.710.220(2).
e• .. ... . . . - ..- . . • •
_. _ .. •! _ - - . .. .-.• .
•
•
... .- --- . .. ... . ..... ... .... ..... e0. . .._ •- .
the issuance of an interim permit pursuant 14.710.100 will,in the long term,resolve the site design
- " !. :! ,., !•.!:!.
14.506.030 Approval Criteria
Criteria for approval or denial of applications shall be established. by the Community Development
Director if it is shown that:.
1. The administrative exception does not detract from the character and nature of the vicinity in
which it is proposed;
2. The administrative exception enhances or protects the character of the neighborhood or vicinity
,
by protecting natural features historic sites open space,or other resources;
3. The administrative exception does not interfere with or negatively impact the operations of
existing land uses and all legally permitted uses within the zoning district it occupies;
4. Granting the administrative exception does not constitute a threat to the public health,safety and
welfare within the city.
14.506.040 Procedures •
The decision and conditions of approval of the Department in granting or denying an administrative
exception should be submitted in writing to the applicant within thirty(30) days,but no longer than sixty
(60) days, of receipt of a complete application. Such decision must indicate how the administrative
exception is consistent or'inconsistent with any criteria or guidelines set forth herein by-the-Planniag
Director. ,•
If the Department determines that a requested administrative exception does not meet appropriate criteria,
•
the application may be processed as a variance in the manner outlined in Section 14A04.080."
--
Sectioii2., Section 14.404.090 Administrative Variance is hereby repealed.
.=
Section 3. 'Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the official
date of incorporation provided publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official
newspaper of the City as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this day of ,2004.
Mayor,Michael DeVleming
ATTEST:
City Clerk,Chris Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Deputy City Attorney, Cary Driskell
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Commission Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2004 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
a information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed ordinance establishing Section 4.15.1 Residential
Standards and Section 4.15.2 Non-Residential Dimensional
Standards of the Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code. The
proposal consolidates and modifies regulations concerning height, area
and setbacks contained in the Interim Zoning Code, deletes obsolete
and/or non-urban provisions, provides for severability and effective
date.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 35A.63.105, WAC 365-195-845, WAC 365-195-855,
Spokane Valley Ordinance 03-53
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council was briefed on interim development
regulations requiring review on April 6, 2004 and
on this issue on May 4, 2004.
BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan pursuant
to Ordinance No. 03-52, subsequently adopting the Zoning Code of Spokane County as interim
development regulations for the new city (Ordinance 03-53). The interim Zoning Code includes
many regulations which do not apply within urban areas and other regulations which staff has
suggested should be amended to eliminate redundancy, ambiguity and conflicts in enforcement.
The proposed amendment would consolidate dimensional standards for development into two
tables, residential and non-residential. The proposal would also amend residential dimensional
standards as follows:
1. Front yard setbacks: reduced to fifteen feet from 25 feet, measured from the property
line or the edge of the border easement.
2. Garage setbacks: twenty feet, added to allow parking within the driveway which does not
overhang public right-of-way or border easements.
3. Side yard setbacks: reduced to a flat five feet.
4. Side yard setbacks (flanking street): reduced to fifteen feet. A significant portion of the
Administrative Exceptions relate to side yard setbacks on corner lots.
5. Rear Yards: the minimum size of rear yard would be increased from 15 feet to 20 feet
for single-family and duplex developments only.
6. Minimum lot sizes and other dimensional requirements within Planned Unit
Developments (PUDs) have been deleted.
There is no change proposed for setback requirements of any accessory structure. Rural
residential zoning classifications SRR-5, R-5, SRR-1, SR-1 and SR-1/2 are repealed as
inappropriate for urban development and because no property within the corporate limits
presently maintains this zoning classification. Rural Residential -10 is retained only because of
existing property retains this designation.
No changes to the non-residential dimensional standards are proposed. The repealing clause
would delete a provision which requires a minimum separation between Neighborhood Business
(B-1) zones of 2,640 feet, unless it is within 100 feet of another B-1 zone. The Interim
Comprehensive Plan encourages the location of business clusters rather than arterial strip
Administrative Report
Dimensional Standards
Page 2 of 2
development, although there is no specific reference in the Comprehensive Plan that the
spacing of these zones is designed to accomplish this objective nor any evidence that the
requirement is intended to accomplish this objective.
The proposed amendment in the Interim Development Regulations is subject to review by the
Department of Community Trade and Economic Development. The Environmental Checklist
was completed on May 20, 2004 and a Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) issued.
Appeals to the DNS should be submitted not later than June 11, 2004.
Subject to Council direction a public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission and their
recommendation will be forwarded to City Council.
A public hearing before the Planning Commission is scheduled for July 22, 2004.
RECOMMENDE I ACTION OR MOTION: None required..
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS: Draft ordinance.
SiTokane
,„ "Valley
Proposed Dimensional
Standards
Community Development Department
July 8,2004
Purpose
• Brief Planning Commission on proposed amendments
to the Interim Development Regulations related to
dimensional standards
BACKGROUND
• Authorized pursuant to RCW 35A.63.105,WAC 365-
195-845,WAC 365-195-855,and the City's Interim
Comprehensive Plan,Goal ED.5a and PolicyED.5.6
• The interim Development Regulations include many
provisions which do not apply within urban areas and
other regulations which staff has suggested should be
amended to eliminate redundancy,ambiguity and
conflicts in enforcement
• On April 6 and June 1,2004,Council was briefed on
problems,including enforcement,associated with a
"sliding scale"of setback requirements and alternatives
1
BACKGROUND f The
t requirement Is
• Current building setback _ 15' 5 per story—
is this a
requirements—"rural" "r' second story?
vs."urban" ,o'
• Significant customer 10.
and staff time spent 5 My garage is
figuring out building single-story
lo
setback requirements ro¢galine
P
• Customer service issue wfuteP alongrtY the
for planning&building ----I--—_ other property
6nethe house Is
staff 25' 55' two story—sol
can have a 5'
setback on one
55'from the roadway side and a,0'
centerline or 25'from the - setback an the
front lot line,whichever is Street other?This is
greatest—where is the how the County
roadway centerline? J has always /
done it.
Proposed Residential Setbacks
Current Proposed
Front Setback 25' 15'
Garage 25' 20'
Side Yard 5'/story 5'
Side Yard(flanking) 25' 15'
Rear Yard 15' 20°
• Tabular format
• Delete minimum 2,640 sq.t.separation between B-1
zones
A Two-Story House
CURRENT I. I PROPOSED
I 115' t 20'
10'
10' 5' 5'
5'
25' 55' 15' `
PD./ to'ecor Easement(Typ)i
I
I PIL}
Street 50'ROW Street 24-28'ROW
2
Next Steps...
Hearing before the Planning Commission
scheduled on July 22,2004
3
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 53 TO ESTABLISH SECTIONS 4.15.1
RESIDENTIAL DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS AND 4.15.2 NON-
RESIDENTIAL DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY
UNIFORM DEVELOPMENT CODE; REPEALING PROVISIONS IN
CONFLICT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND ESTABLISHING
EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, The Interim Comprehensive Plan adopted by the City of Spokane Valley pursuant to
Ordinance 53,specifies dimensional standards for residential and non-residential development;and
Whereas, WAC 365-195-845 provides that "[t]he development regulations of planning
jurisdictions should include provisions addressing the general procedures for processing applications for
development,designed to promote timeliness,fairness and predictability";and
Whereas, WAC 365-195-855 which provides that "[i]n the drafting of development
regulations.....procedures for avoiding takings, such as variances or exemptions, should be built into the
overall regulatory scheme;"and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan Goal ED.5a is to "[p]rovide consistent, fair and timely
regulations that are flexible,responsive and effective"and
WHEREAS, Policy ED.5.6 directs "[r] development regulations continuously to ensure clarity,
consistency, predictability and direction," including "[p]rovide opportunities for citizens to initiate
amendments to inconsistent, outdated,inappropriate or unnecessary or confusing regulations.."consistent
with the Comprehensive Plan(RCW 35A.63.105);and
WHEREAS, the proposed development regulations must be submitted to the Washington
Department of Community Trade and Economic Development pursuant to WAC 365-195-620;and
NOW,THEREFORE,the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, do ordain as
follows:
Section 1. Section 4.15.1 Residential Dimensional Standards and Section 4.152 Non-
Residential Dimensional Standards of the Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code are hereby
established as provided in Exhibit"A"and"B"attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes.
Section 2. Repealer:. The Interim Zoning Code, Sections 14.616.305 through 14.616.335,
14.618.305 through 14.618.335, 14.620.305 through 14.620.335, 14.622.305 through 14.622.335,
14.624.309 through 14.624.335; 14.626310 through 14.626.335, 14.628.315 through 14.628.335,
14.630.310 through 14.630.335, 14.632.3I0 through 14.632.335, 14.634.310 through 14.634.335,
14.636.310 through 14.635.325,and Chapters 14.608 Semi-Rural Residential-5 (SRR-5), 14.609 Rural-5
(R-5), 14.610 Semi-Rural Residential -2 (SRR-2), 14.612 Suburban Residential -1 (SR-1), 14.614
Suburban Residential-1/2 (SR-1/2),and 14.812 Solar Developments. are hereby repealed.
Page 1
Section 3. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence,clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the official
date of incorporation provided publication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official
newspaper of the City as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this day of ,2004.
Mayor,Michael DeVleming
ATTEST:
City Clerk,Chris Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Interim City Attorney,Stanley M. Schwartz
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Page 2
Section 4.15.1 Residential Zone Dimensional Standards
UR-3,5(3)(1) UR 7(3)(1) UR 12(3)(I) UR 22(3)(1)
Single Single Multi- Single Multi- Single Multi-
Family Duplex Family Duplex family Family Duplex family Family Duplex family
Lot Area/Dwelling Unit 10,000 20,000 6,000 11,000 15,000 4,200 5,000 6,000 1,600 3,200 6,000
Lot Frontage 80 80 65 90 100 50 50 60 20 40 60
Lot Depth 80 80 100 80 80 100
g Front Yard Setback 28-15(2) 25-15(2) 26-15(2) 25_1 5(2) 2b-15(2) 15(2) 2§-15(2) 26-15(2) 25_1 5(2) 25-15(2) 2b45i2,
'c 'n
• Garage Setback 20(2) 20(2) 20(2) 20(2) 20(2) 20(2) 20(2) 20(2) 20(2) 20(2) 20(2
2 Rear Yard Setback vI) 20 20 46 20 4-6 20 15 45 2,,0_ 45 20 16 46 20 45 22 15
Side Yard Setback 4) 6+4 5 544 5 644 5 5+"5 5+-5 544 5 5+A 5 6+"-5 644 5 644 5 6+4 5
Side Yard Setback(flanking
Street) 26-15(2) 26-15(2) 26-15(2) 26-15(2) 25-1 5(2) 26-15(2) 26-15(2) 25-15(2) 25-15(2) 25-15(2) 25-15(2
E Density(DU/Acre) 4.35 4.35 7 7 7 12 12 12 22 22 22
E Lot Coverage 50.0% 50,0% 55.0%r 55.0% 55.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 65.0% 65.0% 65.0%
Building Height(in feet) 35 35 35 35 35 40 40 40 50 50 50
+
• Building Height(in stories) 21/2 2% 2% 2% 3 33 4 4 4
(1) "Clear view"Triangle required
(2) e _- - . - .;• - _ . •- _-_ . , _ _ '. _ _- _ Measured from property line outside border easement, if any
Zero setbacks along rear and/or one side are allowed provided that a 5'-0"construction and maintenance easement(s)is recorded with the
(3) Spokane County Auditor prior to issuance of a building permit.Minimum rear yard setbacks on zero lot line configuration shall not be less than fifty
(50)feet or the sum of the rear yards required by the underlying zone,whichever is greater.
(4) Minimum side yard setbacks between dwelling units and adjacent lots shall not be less than 10 feet on the side opposite the zero in a zero lot line
configuration
PUD&
UR 3.5 UR 7 UR 12 UR 22
UR 3.6 UR-7- UR 12 UR22 SF Duplex SF
7,000 47200 3300 800 8400 /1,200 3,600 6;000 808
Let-Rootage 40 40 46 30 60 60 45 60 30
Lot-Depth N/A N/A NFA N/A N/A N/A 80 30 N/A
a6 46 46 45 25to 25to 25w) 26 26�
RearYard-Setback NFA NFA N/A NFA 20 45 45 46 46
N/A N/A NFA N/A 6+1-' 5+15+45+�
N/A NFA N/A NFA 26 25w 26t° 25'') 26t-9
Osne4W4D-WIAcre) 5.36 7 42 22 4.35 7 7 1-2" 222t41,..
Let-Coverage Nene 69:9-% None Nene 68:8% 60:83/4 68:014 68:9% .60 O%
guilding-klelgh eet) 35 35 48 50 35 35 40 40 n/a
A limn -Setba- -' - "-- - - - - -- - - _
EH
(2) Or 55 feet from theieheve-is-greater
(a) !a-addition-to-Density-Bonus
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Commission Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2004 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
►� information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Clear View Triangles
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Spokane Valley Ordinance 03-53 and 03-83.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: Ordinance No. 03-83 (the "Nuisance Ordinance) provides that the Public
Works Director will promulgate policies relative to "clear view triangles". The Interim Zoning
Regulations Section 14.810.020 of the Interim Zoning Regulations provides measuring
standards for "clear view" triangles and regulates the placement of fences and vegetative
screens, including hedges and shrubbery, although the provisions have never been enforced
and may be more appropriate to rural systems than urban areas. This section also regulates
the fencing around swimming pools which will be superseded by the International Codes on July
1, 2004.
The Public Works Department proposes to establish the requirements for"Clear View Triangles"
by ordinance, within the Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code, to be enforced by the
Community Development Department. The proposed ordinance will also relax the fencing
requirements along flanking streets to permit six foot fences, provided they do not encroach on
the "clear view triangle".
The proposed standards measure the triangle from the curb or edge of pavement, rather than
from the centerline of the street, as is presently the case. The proposed provisions eliminate
the bias created by different right-of-way widths and is more clearly understood by property
owners. In the event that the City wishes to avoid future visibility issues associated with fences,
a mechanism to require permits for new fences should be considered.
A determination of Non-Significance was issued on May 26, 2004 and a draft proposal was
submitted to CTED and other agencies for their review. A public hearing will be held before the
Planning Commission prior to any consideration by the City Council.
A Public Hearing is scheduled for July 22, 2004.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None required.
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director
Neil Kersten, Public Works Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Presentation
Draft Ordinance
SOkane
#Valley
Clear view T riangies
Community Development Department
July 8,2004
Background
e The Nuisance Ordinance No.03-83 on October 23,
2003 provides that the Public Works Director will
promulgate policies on"Clear View Triangles"
O The Zoning regulations(Ordinance 03-53)regulates
the placement of fences and shrubbery which is
prohibited within the"Clear View Triangle"
• As written,the standards are difficult to enforce
a This ordinance also regulates fences around swimming
pools,rules which conflict with the requirements of the
International Code
Clear View Triangle
Vegetation within clear-view triangle
v.
Mrimm }y�:.
Ground
1
Y rL; gyp) Mind Corners
i
..:r4
mit
r_ 1,fes `T'.�,s'r1 41-2-07—,---;..
Y'� { '" amt +I
f'li,,r f1- ,
'
•
a▪-. i.7.fit"".if. L : +asY.. •4 ,j:
L
0 • PKS
�,• aNE
r ?'•"'' • UNCONTROLLED
- " '• ,', -,04,' It i INTERSECTION
, ,_ �; • CURRENT
Center line of the road 1.
,� :+ 110'x 110'
Cir �3'. • PROPOSED
•i: Curb/Edge Pavement t
50'x 50'
t
50 ACCESSFTt or.
CUPS
LOCAL STREET
is P .1110. ———,--C.-PROPERTY WE
.
I Uncontrolled
Intersection
,.,� �, Proposed
OTT P.IT-CP-WAT
2
SPEED Fences
P rte'' e!
'-%�•- ':fol T .t..,• =---...-:--.--,;--''
JJ
iii .
tt,
e \\
;t
1.
e
_i. is
CONTROLLED : ,,
INTERSECTION
• CURRENT 4
Center line of the road -
32'x400'
• PROPOSED
Curb/Edge Pavement 1-
16'x varies w/speed ,.
•
3
Stop Controlled Intersection
Proposed
SEE TABLE 7.06.7
THROUP4 SITEET
Et 4k,
L
Posted Speed Distance(in
(in MPH) feet)
25 70
30 95
t'„,, 35 110
Special Cases
• May be established by the Traffic
Engineer in special cases, including but
not limited to:
•arterials with posted speeds in excess of 35
m.p.h.
•one-way streets
• steep grades and
•sharp curves
Proposed Amendments
• Establish Section 7.06 of the Spokane Valley Uniform
Development Code
• Amend Ordinance 03-83 to reference Section 7.06
SVUDC
• Delete provisions in the Interim Zoning Regulation
Section 14.810.020 Fences to delete provisions in
conflict with SVUDC and International Codes
Next Steps
• Planning Commission will hold a Public Hearing on July
8,2004,and forward a recommendation to Council for
action
4
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO. 04-0
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON,
ESTABLISHING SECTION 7.06 OF THE SPOKANE VALLEY UNIFORM
DEVELOPMENT CODE; AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 03-053 cY
AMENDING SECTION 14.810.020 FENCES OF THE INTERIM ZONING
CODE; AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 03-83 RELATING TO THE
PROHIBITION OF NUISANCES; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND
EFFECTIVE DATE,
WHEREAS, the interim Zoning Code adopted by the City of Spokane Valley pursuant to
Ordinance 03-53 regulates the placement of fences and vegetative screens, including hedges
and shrubbery; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 03-83 Prohibition of Nuisances effective on October 23,
2003 provides that vegetation, buildings, structures and fences that obstruct or hinder the use of
any public walkway, sidewalk or street, or that obstruct or obscure the view of traffic or traffic
control devices are prohibited nuisances; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 03-83 further provides that the Public Works Director will
promulgate policies relative to "clear view triangles"; and
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director is responsible for the enforcement of
nuisance ordinances;
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington,
ordains as follows:
Section 1. Section 7.06 of the Spokane Valley Uniform Development Code is hereby
established to read as follows:
"Section 7.06. Clear View Triangle
A clear view triangle is a
measurement applied at _ = � 3
the intersection of two4
Vegetation within clear-view triangle
streets or the
intersection of an alley or
commercial driveway `�''�►,..
and a street, to ensure 1r'"'
unobstructed vision of .�'.
motorists and
pedestrians. Within the - -1 y -•• -
clear view triangle, the rMai
space between three a `� ` " 1 M + 3'M Maximum
and seven feet above
Gmurid
grade must be
unobstructed (See
•
Figure 7.06) and calculated as follows:
a) Uncontrolled Intersection: the right isosceles triangle having sides of fifty feet (50'-0")
measure along the curb line of each intersecting local access street (or five feet from
edge of pavement for a street with no curbs), alley or commercial driveway (See Figure
7.06.a) ; or
50 FT.
LOCAL ACCESS STREET /CURS
ov.„—CT'—�� RICHT—OF—WAY
UPROPERtt UNE
F
•
N
L/1
U
� U
O
I
CITY RIGHT—OF—WAY
Figure 7.06.a. Uncontrolled Intersection
b) Stop Controlled Intersection: the right triangle having a sixteen foot (16'-0") side
measured along the curb line of a local access street (or five feet from edge of
pavement for a street with no curbs), alley or commercial driveway, and the distance
shown on Table 7.06.1 based on posted speed along the side along the curb line of the
intersecting street (or five feet from edge of pavement for a street with no curbs)(See
Figure 7.06.b) ; or
Figure 7.06.b Stop Controlled Intersection
Table 7.06.1
SEE TABLE 7.06i
THROUGH STREET y-CURBPosted Speed Distance
-
7—CITYRICHT—OF—WAY (in MPH)
25 (in feet)
�PROPERtt UNE TO
D_w 30 95
�1 35 110
L L
CITY RIGHT—OF—WAY
c) In cases including, but not limited to, arterials with posted speeds in excess of 35
m.p.h., one-way streets, steep grades and sharp curves the City Traffic Engineer will
determine the appropriate measurement.
Section 2. Section 14.810.020 Fences of the Spokane Valley Interim Zoning Code is hereby
amended to read as follows:
"14.810.020 Fences
1. No sight-obstructing fence more than thirty-six (36) inches in height nor any non-sight-
obstructing fence (cyclone) more than forty-eight (48) inches in height may be erected and/or
maintained within the required front yard or required flanking street yard of any lot used for
residential purposes. Within a P.U.D. a fence may exceed the height limit specified herein if
designated on a preliminary site plan when approved by the Hearing Body as part of the
development concept. Such fence shall not exceed six (6)feet in height, although entranceway
gates, arches, covered entrances, support structures, etc., may exceed this height when a
specific design is presented and approved by the Hearing Body. When perimeter fencing is
used with a P.U.D. design, a minimum of five (5)feet of landscaping is required between such
fences and public/private pedestrian or roadway rights-of-way. Hedges, shrubbery, or other
materials used in lieu of a fence and not a part of a landscaping requirement per Section
14.806.040, yet serving the same function as a fence, shall be considered a fence. A residential
fence exceeding a height of six (6)feet requires a variance from the Hearing Body;
2. Neither residential, commercial or industrial fencing, nor any sight obstruction which
constitutes a hazard to the traveling public as determined by the County Engineer, shall be
permitted on any corner lot in any zone within the area designated as the "clear view triangle"
pursuant to the standards established in Section 7.06 of the Spokane Valley Uniform
Development Code_This area can be determined by measuring one hundred ten (110)feet from
the center of two intersecting local access streets along the centerlines of each local access
street, then connecting the two points with a straight line forming the hypotenuse of the clear
view tr ar glc. (See Clear View Triangle Figure 1) For the intersection of a local access street
with an arterial street, the area can be determined by measuring four hundred (400)feet along
the centerline of the arterial street and thirty two (32)feet along the centerline of the local
access street, then connecting the two points with a straight line forming the hypotenuse of the
have their branches removed afthe trunk from ground level to a minimum of seven (7)feet
required area needed to reduce hazards to the traveling public.
(5,000) gallons shall have a fence net less than four (4) feet in height surrounding the pool, or
gates having a latch openable only from the pool side of the fence located a minimum of forty
pool shall not be considered to qualify as a substitute for the required fence as a means of
providing minimum safeguard of the pool area.
4:3. In the Exclusive Agricultural, General Agricultural, RR-10, SRR-5 and SRR-2 Residential,
and Mining zones, electric fences shall be permitted in accordance with the following standards:
a. Electric fences shall be for the confinement of animals and control of predators.
b. Electric fences shall conform in all respects to the Washington State Rules and
Regulations for electrical wiring, RCW 19.28, as to voltage, amperage, safety factors,
and shall be energized only with Underwriters Laboratories approved exciting
equipment.
c. Electric fences shall be marked with warning signs at least twenty-four(24) square
inches in area located every one hundred and fifty (150) feet. In the EA and GA zones
when the area of the property concerned is twenty (20) acres or more and, providing
further, where the fences are not adjacent to a public highway or platted area, the use of
conspicuous insulators shall be considered sufficient warning when approved by the
State Electrical Inspector.
d. Electric fences shall be prohibited in all Industrial, Business, RS and SR-1 thru UR-22
• Residential zones.
5. 4. Barbed wire fences shall be prohibited in RS and SR-1/2 thru UR-22 Residential zones. In
the B-2, B-3 and Industrial zones, barbed wire may be used for security purposes only on the
upper one-quarter (1/4) of the fence.
B. 5. Nonresidential fences in the Industrial, Business and Mining Zones are allowed up to eight
(8)feet in height.
•- _ _ • ! -- --- -- - - -
Section 3. Ordinance 03-083 is amended to read as follows:
Section 4. Nuisances Prohibited. No person, firm or entity shall erect, contrive, cause,
continue, maintain or permit to exist any public nuisances within the City. Prohibited public
nuisances include, but are not limited to:
A. Vegetation.
1. Overhanging limbs or branches that are less than eight (8) feet above a public
walkway or sidewalk, or less than fourteen (14)feet above a public street.
2. Vegetation that obstructs or hinders the use of any public walkway, sidewalk or
street, or that obstructs or obscures the view of traffic or traffic control devices,
pursuant to clear view triangle policies promulgated by the Spokane Valley Public
Works Director as provided in Section 7.06 of the Spokane Valley Uniform
Development Code.
3. Any growth of noxious weeds or any toxic vegetation shall be subject to WAC
17.750 as currently adopted and hereafter amended.
B. Building, Structures, Fences.
1. Buildings or portions thereof which a are deemed dangerous by the Spokane
Valley Building Code (currently adopted Uniform Code for the Abatement of
provided that such conditions or defects exist to the extent
that life, health, property or safety of the public or the structures occupants are
endangered.
2. Any fence that obstructs or hinders the use of any public walkway, sidewalk or
street, or that obstructs or obscures the view of traffic or traffic control devices,
Works Director as provided in Section 7.06 of the Spokane Valley Uniform
Development Code.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance
shall be held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity
or unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,
sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect following its
passage and subsequent publication in the official newspaper of the City as provided by law.
PASSED by the City Council this day of June, 2004.
Mayor, Michael DeVleming
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Chris Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Deputy City Attorney, Cary Driskell
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Commision Action
Meeting Date: June 24, 2004 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing
information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposal to Amend Ordinance No. 53 to establish Chapter 14.615
Urban Residential Estate (UR-1) Zone and applicable development
regulations.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 36.70, Spokane Valley Ordinance 53
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: None.
BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan pursuant
to Ordinance No. 52, subsequently adopting the Zoning Code of Spokane County as interim
development regulations for the new city (Ordinance 53). The Comprehensive Plan establishes
the following Policies in relevant part:" . . . .Low density residential areas shall range from 1 to
and including six dwelling units per acre" (UL.9.1) and " Spokane County shall seek to achieve
an average residential density in new development of at least 4 dwelling units per net acre in the
Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing types." (UL.9.2)
The zoning classifications established by these regulations provide for a maximum density of
seven dwelling units/acre for areas designated as "Low Density Residential" or "LDR" by the
Comprehensive Plan. Two well-established neighborhoods located within areas designated for
Low Density Residential (LDR) uses have requested consideration of a regulatory mechanism
that would continue to permit the keeping of a limited number of large animals, primarily horses.
These neighborhoods were originally established over twenty-five years ago to allow the
keeping of such animals, a practice that was permitted under the previous zoning classification.
WAC 365-195-310(2)(1) provides that [i]n developing the housing element attention should be
working with the desires of residents to preserve the character and vitality of existing
neighborhoods, along with the rights of people to live in the neighborhood of their choice".
The proposed amendment in the Interim Development Regulations is subject to review by the
Department of Community Trade and Economic Development. Subject to Council direction, a
public hearing will be held by the Planning Commission and their recommendation will be
forwarded to City Council. The actual zoning of one or more geographic areas is an area-wide
rezone implemented by legislative action pursuant to the requirements of Section 14.402.100 of
the Interim Zoning regulations.
A Public Hearing is scheduled for July 22, 2004.
RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: None required. .
BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Not applicable.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS: Draft ordinance.
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WASHINGTON,
AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 03-53 TO PROVIDE INTERIM ZONING
PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 14.615 URBAN RESIDENTIAL ESTATE (U14-1)
ZONE ESTABLISHED HEREIN.
WHEREAS, The Growth Management Act provides that all zoning regulations be consistent with
an adopted Comprehensive Plan(RCW 35A.63.105); and
WHEREAS, The Interim Zoning Code adopted by. the City of Spokane Valley pursuant to
Ordinance 03-53, specifies a maximum net density (dwelling units/acre) for all residential zoning
districts; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35A.63.220 provides for establishment of interim zoning for up to one year
following a public hearing where a Work plan is developed for related studies; and
WHEREAS, the interim zoning may be extended for one or more six-month periods if a
subsequent public hearing is held and findings of fact are made prior to each renewal; and
WHEREAS, "Low Density Residential"is identified as LDR in the adopted Plan,with maximum
densities ranging from one to 4.35(UR 3.5)and 7(UR 7)within designated districts;and
WHEREAS, WAC 365-195-310(2)(1) provides that "f ijn developing the housing element
attention should be working with the desires of residents to preserve the character and vitality of existing
neighborhoods,along with the rights of people to live in the neighborhood of their choice"; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive PIan states that "Spokane County is a community that provides
the opportunity for a variety of housing types and development patterns for all incomes and lifestyles
while preserving the environment and the character of existing neighborhoods"; and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan establishes the following Policies in relevant part:"UL.9.1.
. . . .Low density residential areas shall range from 1 to and including six dwelling units per acre" and
"UL9.2 Spokane County shall-seek to achieve an average residential density in new development of at
least 4 dwelling units per net acre in the Urban Growth Area through a mix of densities and housing
types."; and
WHEREAS, certain well-established neighborhoods located within areas designated for Low
Density Residential (LDR) uses have requested consideration of a regulatory mechanism that would
continue to permit the keeping of a limited number of large animals,primarily horses; and
WHEREAS, these neighborhoods were originally established to allow the'keeping of such
animals;and
WHEREAS, these neighborhoods have been in existence for over twenty-five years.
Page 1
WHEREAS, the proposed development regulations must be submitted to the Washington
Department of Community Trade and Economic Development pursuant to RCW 36.70A.106WAC 365-
195-620; and
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Washington, ordains as
follows:
Section 1. Chapter 14.615 of the Interim Zoning Code is hereby established as an
amendment to Ordinance No.03-53 to read as follows:
"Chapter 14.615
Urban Residential Estate(UR-1)Zone
14.615.100 Purpose and Intent
The purpose of the UR-1 zone is to preserve the character and vitality of existing neighborhoods which
have historically permitted the keeping of a limited number of large animals and livestock. Lots are
presently served by a public water system and may require connection to a publicsewer system. The
residential character necessitates the provision of paved roads and other public facilities.'
14.615.210 Permitted Uses •
Hereafter in the UR-1 zone no building, structure improvements or portion thereof shall be erected,
constructed, converted, established,altered;or enlarged,nor shall any lot or premises be used, except for
those uses specifically permitted in this zone pursuant to Chapter 14.605, Residential Zones Matrix,
Section 14.416, and 14.816. In addition, the following specific standards are required for the following
permitted uses.
A. Residential uses
B. Public and Semipublic Uses
1. Community hall,club or lodge,provided that it is related to local community social
activities and its principal activity includes a service customarily carried on as a business.
2. Public utility transmission facility,provided that:
a. Theutilitycompany shall secure the necessary property or right-of-way to
assure for the proper construction,continued maintenance,and general safety
-to the properties adjoining the public utility transmission facility;
b. All support structures for electrical transmission lines shall have their means of
access located a minimum of ten(10)feet above the ground;
c. The facilitiesshall be compatible with the surrounding uses either by distance,
landscaping,buffering,or design, as determined by the Zoning Administrator;
and
d. The height of the structure above ground does not exceed one hundred twenty-
<five(125)feet.
3. Day care center(in a church or public or private school),provided that:
a. There are no more than fifty(50)children;
b. Any outside play area shall not be closer than fifty(50)feet to a property line;
or
c. Any outside play area must be completely enclosed with a minimum four(4)-
foot fence.
14.615.220 Accessory Uses
Page 2
1. The keeping of poultry and livestock,excluding swine, is permitted subject to the
following conditions:
a. Any building or structure housing poultry or livestock,including but not limited to
any stable,paddock,yard,runway,pen, or enclosure, or any manure pile shall be
located not less than seventy-five feet from any habitation;and
b. No building or structure housing poultry or livestock, including but not limited to,
any stable,paddock,yard,runway,pen, or enclosure, or any manure pile shall be
located within the front yard nor be closer than ten feet from any side property line;
c. Not more than three horses,mules,donkeys,bovines or llama shall be permitted per
gross acre,or
d. Not more than six sheep or goats shall be permitted per gross acre; or
e. Any equivalent combination of c. and d. above;and
f. A maximum of one animal or fowl including duck,turkey, goose.or similar
domesticated fowl,or rabbit,mink,nutria,chinchilla or similar animal,may be
raised or kept per 3,000 square feet of gross lot area or fraction thereof In addition,a
shed,coop,hutch or similar containment structure must be constructed prior to the
acquisition of any small livestock to ensure containment of the livestock on the
premises.
g. Structures,pens,yards,enclosures,pastures and grazing areas shall be kept in a clean
and sanitary condition. In the event that the City receives complaint(s)concerning
the maintenance of animals on individual premises,the Spokane County
Conservation District will evaluate conditions and propose environmentally
acceptable measures for remediation:
2. Home profession,provided that a home profession permit is obtained;
3. Tower,private,provided:
a. That a building permit for the private tower is obtained,reviewed and signed off by
the Community Development Department;
b_ The applicant shall furnish a site plan showing height and location of the private
tower;.
c. The applicant shall furnish a copy of the tower manufacturer's construction/erection
specifications;
d. The private tower shall be erected in accordance with the manufacturer's
specifications;
e. The applicant shall show that the impact area(that area in all directions equal to the
private tower's height above grade)is completely on his/her property. Up to one-half
(1/2)of the tower's impact area in distance may be administratively approved if off of
the applicant's property pursuant to Section 14.506.020(8); or,the applicant has
secured an easement(s)for all property in the towers impact area if not entirely on
his/her ownership. Such easement(s)shall be recorded with the County Auditor.with
a statement that only the Planning Department can remove the recordation;
f. That generally a residence has to be on the same site as the private tower,except for a
private repeater facility or remote base,operations;
g. That the height limitation of the zone is not exceeded without approval of a variance
or administrative exception as respectively pertains; and
Page 3
h. That the setbacks for the private tower shall be the accessory use setbacks of the zone
where it is located,if detached,and shall be the primary use setbacks of the zone
where it is located,if attached to the primary use/building of the property.
4. Beekeeping,hobby,provided that:
d. The activity shall be accessory to a residential use only;
e. The number of beehives shall be limited to one(1)beehive per four thousand
three hundred fifty-six(4,356) square feet of lot area up to a maximum of
twenty-five(25)beehives;and
f. The beehives shall maintain at least the accessory use setbacks and be
completely enclosed with a six(6)-foot barrier(solid fence,hedge,
landscaping,etc.)that necessitates the bees flying over; or
g. The beehives shall maintain at least a twenty-five(25)-foot setback from all
property lines and be isolated from public access by:a security fence;or
h. The beehives shall maintain at least the accessory use setbacks,be not less than
ten(10)feet in height above grade,and be isolated from public access by a
security fence or located on a restricted access platform.
5. Accessory Structure(s)are permitted under the following provisions:
a.
Lot Size Total Combined Square Footage of
Structure(s)Allowed
i. Less than 30,000 sq.ft. 1,000 sq.ft. or 10%of lot size
whichever is greater
ii. 30,000 sq.ft.to 1 acre 3,000 sq.ft.
Greater than 1 acre to 2 acres 4,000 sq.ft.
iv. Greater than acres. 10%of lot size
b. One accessory structure not exceeding 1,000 square feet, shall be permitted prior to the
construction of a primary use.This structure is not for residential occupancy,business use,or
outside vehicle repair.
6: Wireless communication antenna array,provided:
a. That mounted antennas shall not exceed twenty(20)feet above the existing structure to
which they are attached.
b. That before_the issuance of a building permit,the applicant shall have demonstrated that
all applicable requirements of the Federal Communications Commission,Federal
Aviation Administration and any required aviation easements have been satisfied.
c_ .:That the antenna array is pointed or finished in such a manner to match the existing
structure in which it is placed upon,if possible.
14.615.230 Prohibited Uses
All uses not specifically authorized in the UR-1 zone are prohibited,including,but not limited to,the
following:
1. General agriculture use,except as specifically permitted in this section;
4. General industrial use;
5. General commercial use;and
6. Mining.
14.615.240 Conditional Uses
Those uses designated as conditional uses within the UR-3.5 zone on the Residential Zones Matrix,
Chapter 14.605,may be permitted in the UR-1 zone, subject to the same standards and requirements.
Page 4
provided that a conditional use permit authorizing such use has been granted, as set forth in Section
14.404.100. ,
14.615.300 Development Standards
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, evidence of compliance with provisions of Sections 14.615.305
thru 14.615.355 shall be provided to the Department.
14.615.305 Density
The maximum density of dwelling units in the UR-1 zone shall be one(1)Dwelling units per acre.
14.615.310 Minimum Lot Area
The minimum lot area for residential units in the UR-1 zone shall be 40,000 square feet per residential
unit.
14.615.315 Minimum Frontage
The minimum frontage for residential units in the UR-1 zone shall be eighty(80)feet on a public road or
street.
14.616.325 Minimum Yards
The minimum yards and setbacks for permitted and accessory uses in the UR-1 zone shall be as follows:
A.. All Uses Except Accessory Uses
1. Front Yard:A minimum fifty-five(55)-foot setback the centerline of all roadway rights-of-
way or thirty-five(35)-foot setback from the lot front line,whichever provides the greater
setback from the centerline of the roadway right-of-way.
2. Side Yard:Each lot shall have side yard(s) of at least five(5)feet for each story of building.
3. Flanking Street Yard:A minimum fifty-five(55)-foot setback from the centerline of all
roadway rights-of-way or thirty-five(35):foot setback from the existing property line,
whichever provides the greater setback from the centerline of the roadway right-of-way.
4. Rear Yard:The minimum rear yard shall be twenty(20)feet.
B. Accessory Uses.
1 Front Yard: A minimum fifty-five(55)-foot setback from the centerline of all roadway rights-
of-way or twenty-five(35)-foot setback from the lot front line,whichever provides the
greatest setback from the centerline of the roadway right-of-way.
2. Side Yard:
Structure Height(at peak)
0-15 feet = 5 feet
Over 15 feet = 5 feet plus one(1)additional foot for each additional foot of structure
height over 15 feet
Flanking Street Side Yard:A minimum fifty-five(55)-foot setback from the centerline of
all roadway rights-of-way or a thirty-five(35)-foot setback from the existing property
line,whichever provides the greater setback from the centerline of the roadway right-of-
way.
3. Rear Yard:
Structure Height(at peak)
Page 5
0-15 feet = 5 feet
Over 15 feet = 5 feet plus one(1)additional foot for each additional foot of structure
height over 15 feet
4. Other Yards:No other yards are required beyond those required for"clear view triangle" as
noted in Section 14.810.020(2)or for other safety and health standards as determined by the
Department.
14.615.330 Maximum Building Coverage
The maximum building coverage in the UR-1 zone shall be thirty percent(30%)of the lot area.
14.615.335 Maximum Building Height
The maximum height of buildings or structures in the UR-1 zone shall be thirty-five(35)feet.
14.615.340 Parking Standards
Parking standards for uses in the UR-1 zone shall be as provided in Chapter 14:802.
14.615.345 Signage Standards
Signage standards for uses in the UR-1 zone shall be as provided in Chapter 14.804.
14.615.350 Landscaping Standards
Landscaping standards for uses in the UR-1 zone shall be as provided in Chapter 14.806.
14.615.355 Storage Standards
All storage(including storage of recyclable materials)shall be wholly within a building or shall be
screened from view from the surrounding properties and shall be accessory to the permitted use on the
site.There shall be no storage in any required front yard or flanking street yard. Vehicle storage shall
conform to the provisions of Spokane Valley Ordinance 03-067, as if may be amended from time to
time."
Section 2. The.Zoning Map of the City of Spokane Valley is hereby amended to establish Urban
Residential Estate(UR-1)zoning on two tracts shown as Exhibit`B.."
Section 3. Amendment. The Zoning Code,Section 14.605.020 14.605.080 Residential Use
Matrix is hereby amended as shown on the attached Exhibit"A".
Section 4. Adoption of.Other Laws. To the extent that any provision of the Spokane
County Code, or any other law, rule or regulation or Resolution referenced in the attached Development
Regulation is necessary or convenient to establish the validity, enforceability or interpretation of the
Development-Regulations, then`:`such provision of the Spokane County Code, or other law, rule or
regulation is hereby adopted by reference.
Section 5. Severability. If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance shall be
held to be invalid or..unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or
unconstitutionality shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section,sentence,clause or
phrase of this ordinance.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect on the official
date of incorporation providedpublication of this Ordinance or a summary thereof occurs in the official
newspaper of the City as provided by law.
Page 6
PASSED by the City Council this day of June,2004.
Mayor,Michael DeVleming
ATTEST:
City Clerk, Chris Bainbridge
Approved as to Form:
Interim City Attorney, Stanley M. Schwartz
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
Page 7
Chapter 14.605 EXHIBIT"A"
RESIDENTIAL ZONES MATRIX
RR-10 SRR-5- SRR 2 SR-4- SR-142- UR-1 UR-3.5 UR-7 UR-12 UR-22
14.605.020 RESIDENTIAL USES
Accessory Structure(s) P-Acc(1) P Acc(1) P Acc(1) P-Aso(1-)- P Acc(1) P-Acc(1) P-Acc(1) P-Acc(1)
Billboard N N- N- N- N- N N N N N
Caretaker's residence P(1) P(1) P(1) N- N- N N N N N
Clustered housing PUD only
Community residential facility(8 or less residents) N N- N- P- P- P P N N N
Community residential facility,greater than 8 residents,
no more than 25) N N- N- N- N- N N P P P
Community treatment facility(8 or less residents) N N- N- C.U. C.U. C.U.. C.U. N N N
Community treatment facility,greater than 8 residents,
no more than 20) N N- N- N- N- N N C.U. C.U. C.U.
Conditional residential accessory unit C.U.(1) C.U.(1) C.U.(1) C.U.(1-)- C.U.(1) C.U.(1) C.U.(1) N N N
Density bonus(under Chapter 14.704) N N- N- P148- P-U-D- N PUD PUD PUD PUD
Dependent Relative manufactured(mobile)home P-Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) N- N N N N N
Dormitory P P- P- P- P- N P P P P
Duplex P P- P- P- P- N P P P P
Fraternity,sorority P P- P- P- P- N P P P P
Home industry C.U. C.U. C.U. C.U. C.U. N C.U. N N N
Home profession P-Acc.(4) P-Asc.(4) P Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P-Ase,(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4)-
Household pets P P- P- P- 1a P P P P P
Manufactured(mobile)home P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2-) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) N
Manufactured(mobile)home park P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) N P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2)
Multifamily dwelling N N- N- N- N- N N P P P
Nursing home,convalescent home N N- N- N- N- N N P P P
Prison,jail,or institution C.U. N- N- N- N- N N N N N
Private repeater facility P P- P- P- P- _ P P P P P
Retirement/elderly apartment N N- N- N- N- N N P P P
Single-family dwelling,new P P- P- P- P- P P P P P
Solar collector&associated sys P-Acc. P Acc. P Acc. P Acc. P Acc. P-Acc. P-Acc. P-Acc. P-Acc. P-Acc.
Transitional community facility(8 or less residents) N N- N- G:1-- G:13- C.U. C.U. N N N
Transitional community facility(greater than 8 residents,
no more than 20 residents) N N- N- N- N- N N C.U. C.U. C.U.
Tower,private P-Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1)
14.605.040 USE Public/Semi-Public
Adult Entertainment establishment N N- N- N- N- N N N N N
Adult Retail Use Establishment N N- N- N- N- N N N N N
l
Archery, rifle,gun,pistol ranges/clubs C.U. C.U. N- N- N- N N N N N
Business or professional office N N- N- N- N- N N N P P
Cemetery C.U. C.U. N- N- N- N N N N N
Church and parsonage P P- 12- 12- P- P P P P P
P Permitted
P(4)Definition P(1)Chap 14.615-14.622 standards
N Not permitted P-(Acc.)Permitted accessory P(2)Chap 14.808
(1)Specific standards (1)Specific standards C.U.(1)Chap 14.816
Chapter 14.605 EXHIBIT""A"
RESIDENTIAL ZONES MATRIX
RR-10 SRR-5- SRR-2- SR-4- SR-442L URA UR-3.5 UR-7 UR-12 UR-22
Commercial composting storage/processing C.U. N- N- N- N- N N N N N
Community hall,club,or lodge P(1) P(1) P(1) P(4 P(1) Es, P(1) P P P
Community recreational facility P-Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P-Ass44) P Acc.(1) P-AAsc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1)
Community transit center P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) N P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1)
Day care center N N- N- N- N- N N N C.U. C.U.
Day care center(in a church or a public or private
school) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1)
Exercise facility/gym athletic club) N N- N- N- N- N N N N P(1)
Family day care home P P P P P P P P P P
Fire station P P P P P P P P P P
Golf course P(1) P(1) P(1) P P N P N N N
Golf driving range/training center N N- N- N- N- N N N N P(1)
Hospital C.U. P P P P N P P P P
Incinerator C.U. N- N- N- N- N N N N N
Landfill C.U. N- N- N- N- N N N N N
Library P P P P P N P P P P
Medical Office N N- N- N- N- N N N N P
Mini-day care center(in a dwelling) P P P P R P P P P P
Mini-day care center(not in a dwelling) N N- N- N- N- N N N P P '
Nonmotorized trail system C.U. C.U. N- N- N- N N N N N 1
Nursery school P P P P P P P P P P
Park-and-ride facility P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) _ N P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1)
Park,public(including caretakers residence) P la P P P P P P P P
Post office P R P P P P P P P P
Public utility local distribution P P P P P P P P P P
P
Public utility transmission facility P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1)
Racetracks C.U. N- N- N- N- N N N N N
Recreational area,commercial N N- N- N- N- N N N N N F
Sanitarium C.U. P N- N- N- N N N N N
Schools-public and private
1.kindergarten P P P la P P P P P P
2.elementary P P P P P P P P P P
3.middle P P P P R P P P P P
4.junior high P P P P P P P P P P
5.high P 12 P P P N N N P P
6.junior college P P P P P N P P P P
7.college or university P P R P P N P P P P
8. Expansion of existing structure on adjacent
property P P P P P P P P P P
Sewage sludge land application P(1) C.U. N- N- N- N N N N N
Solid waste hauler N N- N- N- N- N N N N N
P Permitted
P(4)Definition P(1)Chap 14.615-14.622 standards
N Not permitted P-(Acc.)Permitted accessory P(2)Chap 14.808
(1)Specific standards (1)Specific standards C.U.(1)Chap 14.816
Chapter 14.605 EXHOBIT°°A°'
RESIDENTIAL ZONES MATRIX
RR-10 SRR-5- SRR 2 SR 1 SR-442- UR-1 UR-3.5 UR-7 UR-12 UR-22
Orchard P R P R N- N N N N N
Pigeon,performing/show P-Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P Acc.(1) P-Acs:(a-) P-Asc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) N N N
Riding stable P P N- N- N- N N N N N
Sawmill and lumber mill P(1) P(1) N- N- N- N N N N N
Transient-agricultural labor residence N N- N- N- N- N N N N N
Tree farming P P P e N- N- N N N N N
Truck gardening P P P P N- N N N N N
Vineyard P P N- N- N- N N N N N
Winery C.U. C.U. N- N- N- N N N N N
Zoological Park P(1) P(1) N- N- N- N N N N N
P Permitted
P(4)Definition P(1)Chap 14.615-14.622 standards
N Not permitted P-(Acc.)Permitted accessory P(2)Chap 14.808
(1)Specific standards (1)Specific standards C.U.(1)Chap 14.816
. ,,, ��� < \t
--toad11bi1111,uiiii
_El ', ____,I_—..-=�` I viii
Lill ;
- 4;
i .
ties
4
/---- . .
. /
Ponderosa (Portion) _
ifIIi f
Exhibit"B" Residential Estate (UR-1) Proposed interim Zoning Boundaries
'1
•
• Rotchford
Acres = ,.,
i
F',- ,.I
Exhibit"t' UR-1 Interim Zoning Work Plan
1 Naini, ct,f.x.-J Chaasle, 61:02 N4 1111120!14 'lilt I
U _iur.Qu2.1iily tol1!.120U4 12r15i20Q1 8.4v,'
i EuvliUrar'_riia t11.211'' hM121J1 2125!20U5 34.3v: 1
1 Public WeaIh 11Y2U12004 1+412005 1-a'1 1
Public;Ne.I 1 12/0!1304 211Pi2i1a5 `0.4,t:
j 6 PBqulai(:"y RtWie:e 2125,12:105 1/2i112(106 47-2e:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
K
clan'Oi .7"."17\----,,,
pcuLbiaLe FINDINGS OF FACT CT
t
f f ? ��®Ii�NTIAL ESTATE
PROPOSED INTERIM ZONING TO(URBAN R
y
STAFF REPORT DATE: June 18, 2004
PROPOSAL DESCRIPTION: Request for consideration of zoning controls to limit residential densities and
to continue practice of allowing the keeping of large animals on residential lots.
PROPOSAL LOCATION: Portions of the Ponderosa and all of Rotchford Acres residential subdivisions.
STAFF PLANNER: Marina Sukup, AICP, Director, Spokane Valley Community Development Dept.
I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
PROPERTY INFORMATION:
Size & Characteristics: Ponderosa: Located adjacent to Browne's Mountain on the southern
edge of the City, abutting the Dishman Natural Area on the east and
the Iller Conservation area on the south. Fully developed single-family
residential lots generally exceeding one acre in size, served by local
access and residential collectors. Limited access to municipal
wastewater collection system. Terrain hilly with intermittent streams
feeding Chester Creek. Portion of the subdivision located within the
100-year floodplain. Large stands of native Ponderosa pines. Abuts a
closed landfill. Platted in phases between 1964 and 1992.
Rotchford Acres: Located on the eastern edge of the City. Fully
developed single-family residential lots generally exceeding one acre in
size, served by local access and residential collectors. No access to
municipal wastewater collection system. Rolling terrain abutting steep
hills with drainage into Saltese Creek. Saltese Creek is located within
the 100-year floodplain. Platted in 1974.
SURROUNDING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN&ZONING
Subject Properties: Comprehensive Plan— Low Density Residential
Zoning—Urban Residential 3.5 (UR-3.5), Urban Residential 7 (UR-7)
Preservation of Existing Residential Subdivisions(UR-1 Interim Zoning)
FINDINGS
IL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:
Relevant provisions of the Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan are found in Chapter 6
(Housing) includes the Vision—"Spokane County is a community that provides the opportunity for a
variety of housing types and development patterns for all incomes and lifestyles while preserving the
environment and the character of existing neighborhoods."
"Planning Principles
The following planning principles, developed through citizen participation efforts, form the basis for
development of the Urban Land Use Chapter.
• Compact urban forms should be encouraged that create a greater sense of"community,"with
pedestrian/bicycle-friendly settlement patterns.
• Neighborhood character should be preserved and protected.
• Jobs, housing, services and other activities should be within easy walking distance and shorter
commute times of each other.
• Communities should have a center focus that combines commercial, civic, cultural and
recreational uses.
• Streets, pedestrian paths and bike paths should contribute to a system of fully connected
routes.
• Communities should have a diversity of housing and job types that enable residents from a
wide range of economic levels and age groups to work and reside within their boundaries.
General Goals
UL.la Provide a healthful, safe and sustainable urban environment that offers a variety of
opportunities for affordable housing and employment.
UL.l b Create a future rich in cultural and ethnic diversity that embraces family and community values
and recognizes the interests of the whole community.
Goal UL.2 Maintain and enhance the quality of life in Spokane County through urban design
standards.
Policies
UL.2.1 Establish minimum performance standards within the zoning code for nuisances such as
noise, vibration, smoke, particulate matter, odors, heat and glare and other aspects as appropriate to
ensure compatibility with adjacent land uses and neighborhoods.
UL.2.2 The design of development proposals should accommodate and complement environmental
features and conditions, and preserve and protect significant cultural resources.
UL.2.6 Develop urban design "guidelines"that provide consistency of application for the design
review process. The guidelines should focus on the functional interrelationships between land use, site
design, neighborhood character and transportation systems.
UL.2.9 Develop neighborhood, subarea and community plans with specific design standards
that reflect and preserve community character.
UL.2.11 Promote linkage of developments with open space, parks, natural areas and street
connections.
Preservation of Existing Residential Subdivisions(UR-1 Interim Zoning)
FINDINGS
UL.2.12 Enhance and preserve the site characteristics of residential development (existing trees,
watercourses, historic features and similar assets) through sensitive site planning tools such as
clustering, lot averaging, transfer of development rights and flexible setback requirements.
Goal UL.4 Encourage exemplary developments and creative design through the use of
performance standards.
Policy
UL.4.1 Allow flexibility and innovative design through the use of performance standards which
emphasize outcomes.
Goal H.9 Coordinate housing policies and programs with %ther jurisdictions, agencies and
neighborho*ds.
H. 1.3—"Provide opportunities for early and continuous participation of citizens and neighborhood
groups in land use and community development planning processes."
H. 1.5—"Encourage the creation and continued operation and effectiveness of neighborhood
associations through neighborhood and subarea planning programs.
Goal H-2 Reduce regulatory barriers and allow greater flexibility in the housing
development process.
Policy
H2.2- When developing housing regulations, consider the balance between housing affordability and
environmental quality, design quality and maintenance of neighborhood character.
H2.3. Develop consistent, precise, fair and enforceable regulations that maintain environmental quality
and public health and safety standards, while minimizing housing development costs.
Housing Policy H2.5. Provide incentives for safe and decent housing that is in close proximity to jobs,
transportation and daily activities.
Goal H.3a Develop a variety of housing options for all economic groups
Policy
H3.2 Ensure that the design of infill development preserves the character of the neighborhood.
Goal ED.5b Promote public/private partnerships that encourage innovation and creativity in the
economic expansion of our region.
Policy
ED.5.6 Review development regulations continuously to assure clarity, consistency, predictability and
direction. Provide opportunities for citizens to initiate amendments to inconsistent, outdated,
inappropriate or unnecessary or confusing regulations. Amendments shall be consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER:
Ponderosa: Low density residential designed for on-premises maintenance of a limited number of
horses. Heavily wooded with rugged terrain in parts. Expansion to the west precluded because of the
Dishman Natural Area and terrain. Over 95% of lots fully developed. Some remain vacant because of
topography.
Rotchford Acres: Low density residential designed for on-premises maintenance of a limited number
of horses. Terrain is relatively flat east of Sullivan Road with steep hillside limiting any easterly
expansion. Equine easements provided on local streets. Subdivision is fully developed.
Preservation of Existing Residential Subdivisions(UR-1 Interim Zoning)
FINDINGS
Social Character: Well-organized and cohesive neighborhoods.
DESIGN QUALITY: Local access and residential collectors designed to accommodate lots of
approximately one acre. Direct access to public streets. Single-family housing is well-maintained
and designed for residential privacy. A limited number of large animals, especially horses is a design
theme in both neighborhoods.
Spokane Valley has not yet established performance or design standards to assure the quality
of residential design to preserve neighborhood character.
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY:
Wastewater. Limited access to public sewer in the Ponderosa. Balance of property relies on septic
systems. Rotchford Acres relies entirely on septic systems. Re-subdivision to increase residential
densities should not be permitted absent an organized wastewater collection and treatment system.
Potable Water. Ponderosa is served by Spokane County Water District#3, Rotchford by Vera Irrigation
Dist. #14, both Group "A" Community Water Systems. Re-subdivision to increase residential densities
will require adequate supply and pressure for domestic consumption and fire protection.
Stormwater: the Ponderosa subdivision has intermittent streams that drain to Chester Creek. The
contribution of to the rate and volume of flows from additional impervious cover resulting from re-
subdivision could result in an environmental damage as yet undetermined for which mitigation would
need to be established in a planned and coordinated manner. Similar concerns concerning drainage
which could affect Saltese Creek
Erodable soils: Both the Rotchford and Ponderosa subdivisions include or abut geological hazard
areas which require further evaluation prior to allowing additional residential densities.
Native Vegetation/habitat: Ponderosa includes areas of wildlife critical habitat for White Tail Deer and
threatened species.
Spokane Valley has not yet established performance or design standards to assure the
continued preservation of environmental quality in outlying areas with limited public
infrastructure and specific environmental conditions, such as steep slopes, intermittent
floodingand highly erodable soils.
PUBLIC HEALTH & SAFETY:
Access: Ponderosa: Property lies west of the Union Pacific Railroad with only two points of access.
Additional access should be required prior to any increase in residential densities for evacuation and
emergency services.
Animal Maintenance: The requirements for the maintenance and upkeep of even a limited number of
large animals raises issues of compatibility resulting from noise, odor, proximity to residential
structures, flies, etc.. These issues are compounded with increased residential densities and
requirements for buffering for any additional residential densities may be required.
Landfill: Ponderosa: The proximity of a closed landfill to an increased number of residences requires
additional study.
Spokane Valley has not yet established performance or design standards to assure continued
compatible principal and accessory land uses within residential neighborhoods.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
Current property owners purchased property with notice of existing regulations pertaining to the
keeping of large animals. The Short Plat process requires notice only to adjacent property owners.
Preservation of Existing Residential Subdivisions(UR-1 Interim Zoning)
FINDINGS
COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA): Ordinance No. 48 (effective
March 31, 2003) adopted on an interim basis by reference the Spokane Environmental Ordinance
(Spokane County) thereby implementing the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and Chapter 197-
11 of the Washington Administrative Code (WAC) within the jurisdictional limits of the City of
Spokane Valley. An Environmental checklist was completed and a Determination of Non-Significance
was issued on April 26, 2004. Conclusions were based on the finding that a regulation preserving the
status quo would have no adverse environmental impact.
Conclusion(s):
Permitting piecemeal increase in residential densities without the establishment of
performance and design standards raise serious issues related to preservation of
neighborhood character and design, maintaining environmental quality, public health and
safety, and the adequacy of public notice, which require additional study prior to the
establishment of permanent regulation.
III. DECISION
The Ponderosa and Rotchford Acres should be zoned UR-1 (see Exhibits "A" and "B" attached)
on an interim basis pursuant to RCW 35A.63.220 following a public hearing before the Planning
Commission, pending resolution of issues identified above. Resolution of issues shall be
accomplished in accordance with the Workplan attached as Exhibit"C"
Preservation of Existing Residential Subdivisions(UR-1 Interim Zoning)
FINDINGS
CHAPTER 7 e ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
9.0 Introduction and Purpose
A city can foster economic development to achieve its goals by anticipating and responding to
changes in the local, regional, national and international economies. For Spokane Valley, these
goals include providing for economic stability through economic diversity and encouraging a
broad range of jobs to help employ the community's residents.
A city's economic development actions can include activities primarily directed toward economic
development and those undertaken for other reasons, but that also produce economic benefits.
Examples of activities primarily directed toward economic development include allocating land
for manufacturing uses, extending water and sewer systems to business sites, providing tax
credits and incentives and advance planning to accommodate growth. Examples of activities
with economic benefits as secondary impacts include providing an efficient transportation
system, encouraging high quality schools, providing for affordable housing, streamlining permit
processes and providing park and recreation facilities and activities that improve the quality of
life.
Market-driven economic growth depends upon the decisions of individuals and firms; most jobs
and investments are generated by private businesses. Local governments must also contend
with forces beyond local control, such as changes in the regional, national and international
economies. These changes result from numerous individual decisions and changes in economic
and social trends. But local governments can plan to take advantage of favorable trends and
lessen the impact of unfavorable trends. Local governments also can hinder economic
development through ill-advised policies, such as fiscal zoning which involves zoning more land
than is needed for uses that produce relatively high tax revenues.
9.1 Planning Context
9.1.1 Washington State Growth Management Act
The Growth Management Act (GMA) includes economic development as one of its basic goals
and it is a theme that runs throughout the GMA. It considers the need to stimulate economic
development throughout the state, but requires that these activities be balanced with the need
to protect the physical environment. It encourages the efficient use of land, the availability of
urban services, and the financing strategies necessary to pay for infrastructure. Finally, the
GMA mandates that communities do their planning and then provide the zoning and regulatory
environment so that appropriate development can occur. GMA recognizes that while the public
sector can shape and influence development, it is the private sector that generates community
growth.
The GMA (RCW 36.70A.020) includes statewide planning goals, which includes Goal 5, a
specific goal regarding economic development:
RCW 36.70A.020(5) Economic development— Encourage economic development throughout
the state that is consistent with adopted comprehensive plans, promote economic opportunity
for all citizens of this state, especially for unemployed and for disadvantaged persons, and
SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 CHAPTER 9—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
encourage growth, all within the capacities of the state's natural resources, public services, and
public facilities.
The GMA requires an economic development element to be included in comprehensive plans
(RCW 36.70A.070 (7)). An economic development element must include the following:
• A summary of the local economy such as population, employment, payroll, sectors,
businesses, sales, and other information as appropriate;
• A summary of the strengths and weaknesses of the local economy defined as the
commercial and industrial sectors and supporting factors such..as land use,
transportation, utilities, education, work force, housing, and rnatural/cultural resources;
and
• An identification of policies, programs, and projects to foster economic growth and
development and to address future needs.
9.1.2 County Wide Planning Policies
The Spokane County Wide Planning Policies (CWPPs) required by GMA(RCW 36.70A.210)
and adopted in 1994 with subsequent amendments in 1996 and 1997, provide a regional
framework to achieve goals of the GMA. The CWPPs are a refinement of policy direction of
GMA and a result of a collaborative process between Spokane County and the cities and towns
within the county.
The CWPPs include Policy Topic 8— Economic Development that in conjunction with the GMA,
provides individual jurisdictions policy guidance as local comprehensive plans are developed.
The CWPPs establish overall policy direction that call for greater cooperation and coordination
between the private sector and government in measuring both the performance of the local
economy and the relationship between economic development and preservation of the area's
natural environment and quality of life. 1n addition the CWPPs emphasize the need for a
regional(Washington and Idaho)approach to the critical environmental issues of water and air
quality and their potential influence on th e-region's economic development. The following are
the CWPPs relative to economic development:.
1. include an economic development element in each jurisdiction's comprehensive plan
which includes, but is not limited to:
a an inventory of available land suitable for agricultural, commercial and industrial
development and use,
b.theidentification of available infrastructure including transportation (air, rail, roads)
and utilities;
c. the identification;ofavailable housing to support economic growth;
d. a process#o analyze commercial and industrial sectors and provide for job creation
and retention strategies consistent with community desires; and
e. encouraging diversification of the economy and consideration of business
classifications that are not represented.
2. Jurisdictions shall adopt in their comprehensive plans economic development policies
which will help protect the environment as a key economic value in the region.The
comprehensive plans shall define how the jurisdictions will work cooperatively with
businesses to assist them with compliance of environmental regulations.
SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2 CHAPTER 9—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
3. Each jurisdiction, in conjunction with a citizen participation process, shall utilize
economic development organizations to identify level of service and performance
standards to encourage economic development for infill areas and to take advantage of
existing infrastructure.
4. Each jurisdiction shall develop plans for extending infrastructure to meet the demands of
economic growth.
5. Jurisdictions shall cooperate to establish countywide economic development and
employment goals and participate with the private sector to annually evaluate economic
trends and progress towards achieving economic development and employment goals
on a countywide level.
6. The Steering Committee should promote a proactive planning approach between
Washington and Idaho to establish uniform environmental protection measures related
to water and air quality on the local, state and federal level and economic impacts. This
may include the establishment of a regional planning association with adjacent counties
and the State of Idaho.
7. Maintain the integrity of downtown Spokane as a center for retail, business and cultural
activity.
8. Each jurisdiction should designate sites for industrial and service employers to
encourage their location throughout urban areas in proximity to housing and regional
transportation facilities (including public transportation).
9. Each jurisdiction should ensure the long-term holding of appropriate land in large parcel
sizes to allow for future development with industrial uses.
10. Spokane County should maintain commercial agricultural areas to protect the long-term
viability of agriculture as an important element of the local economy.
9.1.3 Spokane Area Economic Development Council
Another important piece of the regional economic development picture is the Spokane Area
Economic Development Council (EDC). The EDC is the primary, regionally focused, economic
development organization in Spokane County. The EDC purpose is to assist relocating
businesses and those who wish to grow in the region and in doing so, the EDC supports the
expansion of jobs and economic prosperity throughout the area.
In the past 15 years;the EDC has helped bring more than 10,000 new jobs to the Spokane
region. EDG has recruited more than 100 companies including such companies as Boeing,
Goodrich Corp., The Guardian, Safeco, Travelers, Scanivalve Corp., Zak Designs, Lincare, Lyn-
Tron, ICT Group, GSI Outdoors, Edmo Distributors, Pitney Bowes, First Index, Artesian Direct,
ConvergenceNow, Northern Technologies, Potlach Corp. and more.
The Spokane Area EDC, operating as an independent non-profit corporation since 1974, has
assisted in the recruitment of some 150 businesses, employing over 15,000 people, to the
Spokane Region. The economic impact of these jobs in the region conservatively exceeds
$500,000,000 annually, while the true economic growth that the EDC and it's partners have
supported in the region may be substantially above this figure.
SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3 CHAPTER 9—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
The Spokane Area EDC works collaboratively with key partners and organizations in the region.
The EDC's partners include Spokane County; the City of Spokane; the City of Spokane Valley;
the Cities of Liberty Lake, Medical Lake, Cheney, Airway Heights; the Spokane Regional
Chamber of Commerce; the Chambers of the Spokane Valley, West Plains, Deer Park; SIRTI;
International Trade Alliance; INTEC, SNEDA, and a number of other local and regional
community based organizations.
Recent economic plans generated by the region include the Focus 21 and the New Century
Plan. Focus 21, A Regional Economic Growth Strategy for the 21st Century, is an economic
development plan designed to create 10,000 new higher paying jobsfor the Spokane area and
Inland Northwest region. Focus 21 evolved from the successful Momentum program that
existed between 1987 and 1997. The New Century Plan, initiated in 1996, is a community-
based plan that has developed strategies and benchmarks for economic development and
quality of life issues.
9.2 Summary of Local Economy
Previous development trends indicate that the non-residential areas of Spokane Valley reflect a
community that has the ability to absorb higher density(more compact) uses and greater
development as growth in the Spokane region continues.And even though Spokane Valley is a
new city in a suburban area, much of its future will be tied to redevelopment and transformation.
This is particularly true as Spokane Valley more fully develops a more definable identity.
Spokane Valley is characterized by the following
• High-quality single-and multiple -family residential areas;
• A range of housing that includes modest tract homes, manufactured dwellings, to large
luxury homes;
• Auto-oriented, suburban scale regional and community shopping centers and strip
centers;
• Many marginal commercial areas with redevelopment potential along Sprague Avenue,
many of which are vestiges of a prior era;
• No identifiablecity center;
• A large supply of industrial zoned land; and
• "An underutilized amenity in the Spokane River.
9.2.1 Demographics
9.2.2 Summary of Strengths and Weaknesses
9.2.3 Regional Labor Force
A qualified labor force is essential to recruit and retain businesses. The basic component in the
development of a qualified labor force is the educational community. Within the Spokane region
a wide variety of higher education facilities including community colleges, universities (both
public and private) and private technical and business schools. The facilities along with the K-
12 public and private school system should be encouraged to constantly evaluate their
SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4 CHAPTER 9-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
programs to be responsive to the changing job market. Partnerships between business and the
education community are key to further this process. Business should be encouraged to partner
with labor unions and other organization to develop specialized training programs to meet the
needs of employers.
9.3 Priorities and Strategies
As with many cities, Spokane Valley will have limited funds with which to pursue its economic
development goals. The City will have to use its resources in a focused and prioritized manner
to have a positive impact on the local economic base. It will be imperative that Spokane Valley
make strategic investments of the limited resources available.
Priorities
EDP-1 The City will emphasize redevelopment that transforms the City from
a suburban bedroom community to a full-service community with an identifiable
city center.
EDP-2 The City will encourage and support the development of recreational
and cultural facilities and/or events that will bring additional visitors to Spokane
Valley, and/or increase visitor spending.
EDP-3 The City will encourage and support existing businesses to remain
and/or expand their facilities within Spokane Valley.
EDP-4 The City shall work with the business community, labor, EDC and
residents-to.maintain a favorable business climate and maintain a high quality of
life.
EDP-5 The City shall continuously evaluate, monitor and improve its
development standards and permitting processes to ensure that they are
equitable, cost-effective, timely and meet community needs.
EDP-6 Development standards for retail, office and manufacturing areas
shall balance community needs and goals with the need to cost-effectively
provide sites for businesses. These needs and goals include providing adequate
public services with low maintenance costs, attractive and efficient areas and
minimal adverse impacts on nearby uses and the environment.
EDP-7 The City should undertake the following economic development
roles:
• Allocate sufficient land for retail, office, and industrial uses;
• Insure that appropriate public facilities and services are
available to support planned economic development;
• Expedite permit decisions;
• Participated in local and regional organizations that conduct
economic research, develop regional strategies and market the City
and region such as the Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce and
the Spokane Area Economic Development Council.
SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5 CHAPTER 9-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
EDP-8 Encourage the growth of tourism as a sustainable provider of jobs
and markets in the region and work together with community groups and
businesses to help make the region a world-class tourist destination.
EDP-9 Promote a qualified labor force that is globally competitive and
responds to the changing needs of the workplace.
Implementation Strategies
EDI-1 Development of a City Center will receive appropriate attention in the
Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan(SVCP).
EDI-2 The City shalt develop appropriate urban design and infrastructure
standards for the City Center area.
EDI-3 The City shall develop zoning, permitting, and incentives that encourage
prioritized development consistent with the SVCP.
EDI-4 The City will work with the private sector to actively encourage the
retention and expansion of existing businesses, as well as bring in new development,
businesses, and jobs to the community.
EDI-5 The City will promote the community by working with the Spokane Valley
Chamber, Spokane Area EDC and the private sector to develop marketing tools that
attract new businesses, visitors, and investments into the City.
EDI-6 The City will continue to utilize design guidelines to enhance the urban
environment to retain and attract businesses and residents.
EDI-7 Support and provide, where appropriate, economic development
techniques to provide business climate conducive to new and start-up businesses.
FDI-8 Encourage creation and retention of home-based businesses that are
consistent with neighborhood character.
ED1-9 Encourage programs that promote sustainable business practices (e.g.
recycling, pollution control, solar energy, commute trip reduction).
EDI-10 Review development regulations continuously to ensure clarity,
consistency, predictability and direction. Provide opportunities for citizens to initiate
amendments to;inconsistent, outdated, inappropriate or unnecessary or confusing
regulations. Amendments shall be consistent with the SVCP.
EDI-11 Ensure timely processing of land use applications by requiring mandatory
timelines, consistent with state legislation, are adhered to for permit processes.
EDI-12 Maintain an inventory of usable industrial and commercial land that is
sufficient to meet projected demand and encourage marketability of the region.
SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 6 CHAPTER 9-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
EDI-13 Ensure that adequate transportation and utilities to support future
industrial and commercial needs through capital facilities planning and coordination with
local providers of utility services.
EDI-14 Encourage educational institutions to locate in Spokane Valley,
particularly those that provide technical training to support businesses targeted for
recruitment.
EDI-15 Encourage an interactive relationship between schools and businesses
through apprenticeship, mentoring and other programs.
SPOKANE VALLEY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7 CHAPTER 9—ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT