Agenda 09/23/2004 Pt 1 t` 19
SPOKANE VALLEY PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
Council Chambers -City Hall 11701 E. Sprague Avenue
6:310 p.m.—9:30 p.m.
k September 23, 2004 *
- :-
CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
• August 26, 2004
VI. PUBLIC COMMENT
VII. COMMISSION REPORTS
VIII. ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT
IX. COMMISSION BUSINESS
Old Business:
• Tabled Public Hearing—Street Vacation Request No. STV-03-04
New Business:
• Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. CPA-01-04
• Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. CPA-02-04
▪ Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. CPA-03-04
• Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. CPA-04-04
• Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. CPA-05-04
• Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. CPA-06-04
• Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. CPA-07-04
• Public Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Amendment No. CPA-08-04
▪ Public Hearing: Greenacres Area-wide Rezone Application No. REZ-11-04
X. FOR THE GOOD OF THE ORDER
Xl. ADJOURNMENT
COMMISSIONERS CITY STAFF
Fred Beaulac Marina Sukup,AICP
Robert Blum Greg McCormick, AICP
John G. Carroll Scott Kuhta, AICP
David Crosby Debi Alley
William Gothmann, Chair
Gail Kogle
Ian Robertson, Vice-Chair ,,v ww.spokanevalley.orq
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Request for Planning Commission Action
Meeting Date: September 24, 2004 City Manager Sign-off:
Item: Check ail that apply: ❑ consent ori old business D new business [] public hearing
ID information ❑ admin. report RI pending legislator
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Street Vacation Amended Request STV-03-04 fora remainder of
David Road located between Sprague Avenue and Appleway, west of Thierman Road
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: City Council adoption of Ordinance Na 04-001
(Street Vacations) in January 2004. On July 27th, 2004 by Resolution 04-023 City Council set
August 25th, 2004 as the date for a public hearing on the proposal. Planning Commission held a
public hearing on the vacation on August 26, 2004.
BACKGROUND:
Chris Linc Properties L.L.C., 2320 North Atlantic Street, Spokane WA 99205 the owner of
abutting Parcel No. 35242.0102 amended the request for the vacation of a remainder of David
Road, originally acquired by Spokane County for the Appleway Extension. The amended
request does not include the portion of David Street extending 20 feet south of the Sprague
Avenue right-of-way which remains within the jurisdiction of WSDOT. Spokane Utilities will
require a 25-foot easement for a 54 inch wastewater interceptor current located or the adjacent
property to the east. The sewer interceptor extends to the centerline of David Street and then
proceeds in a southerly direction. Spokane Water District No. 3 will require a 20-foot easement
to allow for the repair, maintenance and replacement of an existing water line. The design of
any swales and drywells will need to be located not less than ten feet from the water line, whihe
maintaining five feet of cover over the line itself. In addition Avista will require a ten foot
easement five foot from the centerline of existing power lines along the east boundary of the
property and a ten foot easementalong the west side of David Street located five feet from the
centerline of a two inch natural gas line extending between Sprague Avenue and Appleway.
The gas line will require a minimum of 30 inches of cover and prohibition of asphalt paving
andior the traffic of heavy equipment exceeding 30,000 pounds /axle over the easement.
Any future vacation of that portion of David Street currently within the jurisdiction of WSDOT will
require reservation of a seven foot easement adjacent to the right-cif-way of Sprague Avenue for
Avista.
-1I ....� ,, ..1.6579 i 1 e.,- 6E6 SOT wYMirtlirlSAi,l4
! ZlRy1 i}""L$i54 14Y4p' :444114.W
±I...I
I - _+ r. ,:: _�•-
11S
N
1' 5
I. . r .1
iii
sagL ! La59o- - - -^ 21 ,..
{ Ct . I .: :u„
I M--
'may �. _�-- �.r—�'-r�—e— 1
C ' '"-'— VI '4Y6 e� I71'in--
? —
I I
r yy i a - S I I ALL
—I I { I re,.Am.>e
_ O
3
1.,,-1
AL -
'I x i - 33f1.CC - •
— Z--
--.'
77 .x 0 6
ppir
I.
ii 4
1 -. 1 44 .14. ri r L , ; i
Ss. 3G V1[R CASEur- POI r
,4.1:., '�9 T.D. * Y
AM-5SW!OCCUL.114 r L6't b+6 -N L _' .1
gaECCOi:a 0.1."1./.2:}33
W
.;w /3 - ,
4 ## V b
Pli Y
A
4 q," ''''' .4t2.54.
' A
.#. •Y n
.' f r.
4.
1 r a r f xQ r
y O
Ci
t!r ! , UIQ.. , C
+,y 3
IA ti �?� -4'dJ r 6 5
11?1 -24_4=4-110 las or
4
Ga _�.__ _ - 1C
5t AVEAYE MER FARM C('NT RUK
RECOMMENDATION: Legal counsel has advised that the amended request will require a
public hearing. The hearing requires fourteen day notice and is scheduled for October 14,
2004.
STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director
City of Spokane Valley
Request for Planning Commission Review
DATE: September 17, 2004
TYPE:
❑ Consent ❑ Old. Business ❑ New Business Public Hearing
❑ Legislation ❑ Information ❑ Administrative Report
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Area-wide Rezone request, North Greenacres area.
GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Interim Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan
and development regulations
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley Interim Zoning Code, Section
14.402.100, provides a process for property owners to initiate an area wide rezoning
action via petition. The code requires that at least 51% of the property owners within
the boundary of the proposed zone change sign the petition for rezone in order to
initiate the rezoning process_
On July 1, 2004 the City received a petition from the North Greenacres neighborhood
requesting a rezone from the existing Urban Residential 7' (UR-7)to Urban Residential
3.5 (UR-3.5). City staff verified the signatures on the petition utilizing the most current
tax payer records of the Spokane County Auditor's office.
The area under consideration for this rezoning action is bounded on the south by
Mission Avenue, Barker Road on the east and the Spokane River to the north and west.
The area is approximately 457 acres and is comprised of 264 separate parcels of land.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff report and attachments including vicinity, zoning and
comprehensive plan maps.
STAFF CONTACT: Greg McCormick, AICP - Planning Division Manager
r«,u(
STAFF REPORT
po SUBJECT: AREA WIDE REZONE-01-04
Walley Community Development Department
PLANNING DIVISION
Hearing Date: September 23, 2004
Staff: Greg McCormick, AICP — Planning Division Manager
Scott Kuhta, AICP —Senior Planner
L Background
Section 14.402.100 of the Interim Spokane Valley Zoning Code provides a process for
property owners to initiate an area-wide rezoning action by petition. The code requires
that at least 51 percent of property owners within the boundary of the proposed zone
change sign the petition to initiate the rezone process. On July 1, 2004, a
representative from the Greenacres neighborhood submitted a petition with signatures
of more than 51 percent of property owners requesting a zone change from Urban
Residential-7* (UR-7*) to Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5).
The Community Development Department placed a notice of public hearing in the
Spokane Valley News Herald on September 3, 2004, notifying the public that a public
hearing on the proposed area wide rezone would be conducted by the Planning
Commission on September 23, 2004. As required by Section 14.402.100 of the city's
interim code, public notice boards were posted in conformance with requirements of the
appropriate code sections. Moreover, city staff sent written notice to all property
owners within the proposed rune area and property owners within 400 feet of the
boundaries of the rezone area, based on the most current tax payer records of the
Spokane County Assessor's office.
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) an environmental checklist was
required for the proposed rezoning action. Under SEPA rezones are considered "non-
project actions", which are defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or
programs that contain standards controlling use of modification of the environment.
Staff reviewed the environmental checklist submitted for the proposed rezone and a
threshold determination was made on the requested rezone. The City issued a
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) on August 24, 2004. The DNS was published in
the City's official newspaper consistent with City of Spokane Valley requirements.
REZA7-D4—GreenaeresAreawideRezone loge I oFI
IL Previous Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Actions
The subject site is generally bounded by Mission Avenue on the south, Barker Road on
the east, and the Spokane River on the north and west. The subject site is
approximately 457 acres and approximately 264 separate parcels of land. As previously
stated, the existing zoning in the area is UR-7*. The UR-7* zoning district allows 6
single family dwelling units per acre. The UR-7* district also allows duplexes and
multifamily structures as long as the overall density does not exceed 6 units per acre.
This area was involved in an area wide rezoning action in 1994 by Spokane County.
The County received a comprehensive plan amendment request (CPA-79-94) and
rezone request (1 -17- ) from the North Greenacres neighborhood requesting the
following:
• Amend the comprehensive plan map west of Flora Road, north of Mission from
"Industrial"to"Urban";
• Amend the zoning map from I-2, Industrial west of Flora Road and from UR-3.5
east of Flora Road to SR-1.
Based on this request the Board of County Commissioners (BoCC) directed county
planning staff to conduct a study of the subject area. The Spokane County Planning
Department developed a "Lead Agency Report" (June 16, 1994) referred to as the
"North Greenacres" Study. The report stated that the County was mandated to
establish an "interim" urban growth area (IUGA) by October of 1996. This action would
determine if the subject area was "Urban" or "Rural" under the County's comprehensive
plan required by the Growth Management Act (GMA). As indicated above, the IUGA
was established prior to the County starting work on the GMA comprehensive plan. The
North Greenacres study states:
"The Planning Departments major concern, regarding the 'Worth Greenaeres"
Neighborhood, Is the unknown results of the 20 year Urban Growth Area (GA)
boundary and which fQture Land Use Category would be assigned to the "North
Greenacres"portion of the Valley'
The report further states (page 20) that County's intention was to consider the
comprehensive plan amendment and rezone as an "interim" measure until the IUGA
and ultimately the GMA Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the County. Spokane
County adopted an IUGA that designated the subject area as 'Urban". Additionally the
County adopted its GMA Plan in January 2061 that designated the subject property as
"Low Density Residential" on the comprehensive plan map.
iSEZ-17-D4—CieciaeresAreaw[de Rezone Page 2 et'4
III. Analysis of Proposed Rezone
The City of Spokane Valley adopted the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan (including
map) and development regulations as interim measures upon incorporation. As the
attached Comprehensive Plan Map indicates the subject area is designated Low Density
Residential (LDR). Several goals and policies are included the City's interim
comprehensive plan related to residential areas of the City, particularly the Residential
Land Use Section of the Urban Land Use Chapter. Specific goals and policies that
support the requested rezone include:
Goal UL.7 — Guide efficient development patterns by locating residential
development in areas where facilities and services can be provided in a cost-
effective and timely fashion.
Policy UL.7.3 — New urban development must be located within the Urban Growth
Area (UGA) boundary.
Goal UL.8 — Create urban areas with a variety of housing types and prices, including
manufactured home parks, multifamily development, townhouses and single-family
development.
Goal UL.9a — Create a variety of residential densities within the Urban Growth Area
with an emphasis on compact nixed-use development in designated centers and
corridors.
The City of Spokane Valley adopted interim development regulations under Ordinance
53-03, which adopted the Spokane County Zoning Code as amended, as the interim
zoning code for the City. The interim zoning code includes the County's Phase I
Development Regulations. Section II of the Phase I Development Regulations include a
table designed to stipulate comprehensive plan categories and zoning designations that
are consistent with and implement the comprehensive plan map designations.
As previously stated the subject area is designated LDR on the City's interim
comprehensive plan map. The table referenced in the previous paragraph indicates
that implementing zoning designations for the LDR map designation are UR-3.5 and
UR-7*. The proposed rezone to UR-3.5 is consistent with the subject table.
Staff would like to state that the rezoning of this area to UR-3.5 will not preclude
individual property owners in the subject area from requesting rezones of individual
properties to UR-7* Site specific rezone requests are processed through the City's
hearing examiner on a case-by-rase basis.
REE.17-44—Gretnacres Arcawidc itaione nage 3 of 4
IV. Findings and Recommendation
Planning Division staff makes the following findings related to the proposed rezone:
1. The rezone petition is sufficient in that signatures of over 51% of the property
owners in the affected area have signed the petition;
2. An environmental review of the proposed rezone was completed and a threshold
determination issued by the City consistent with state requirements;
3. The proposed rezone is consistent with appropriate goals and policies of the
City's Interim Comprehensive Plan; and
4. The proposed rezone is consistent with the City's Interim Zoning Code's
comprehensive plan category/implementing zoning table included in Section II of
the Phase I Development Regulations adopted by the City of Spokane Valley in
Ordinance 53:O3.
Planning Division staff recommends the requested area-wide rezone be approved.
Attachments
REZ-37-04—GreeraGres Are4widt Rczarie Fagg 4 ofd
o DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNny,DEVELOPMENT" j
40,ValleY
AREAWIDE REZONE APPLICATION
APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE: Mary Pollard
MAILING ADDRESS: 17216 East Baldwin
CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA ZIP: 99224
PHONE (home): 926-8899 PHONE (office): 926-8899 CELL: 990-3103
EMAIL ADDRESS: marypnicehouse.net
NUMBER OF PARCELS WITHIN SUBJECT AREA; 264
GENERAL BOUNDARY OF PROPOSAL: North and West boundary is Spokane River; South
boundary is Mission Avenue; east boundary is Barker Road.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF EXISTING LAND USES WITHIN SUBJECT AREA: Farming, storage
of large machinery, greenhouses, commercial raising of flowers, equipment repair shop, single
family residential homes, classic car paint shop, small orchards, gardening, barns and shops
for storage of personal and small business use (such as an upholstery shop.)
SIZE OF SUBJECT AREA (acres or square feet):
EXISTING ZONE CLASSIFICATION(S): Urban Residential 7* (UR-7*)
PROPOSED ZONING: Urban Residential 3.5 (UR-3.5)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CATEGORY: Low Density Residential
LIST PREVIOUS LAND USE ACTIONS, IF ANY, INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
In 1994 there was an area-wide study conducted by Spokane County following the GMA process
that resulted in an area-wide zoning of SR1. In January, 2002, when the county adopted their
Comprehensive Plan, they zoned our area UR.7*. Our existing land use and insufficient level of
services and improvements (such as roads), created a hardship for this neighborhood to safely
function at this density. The zoning designation also changes the ability to continue animal
keeping, except under the grandfather provision. There is a majority interest in retaining this
right. This is the impetus for application for an area wide rezone of UR3.5. We are seeking to
protect our area from high development. This is the only zoning available under the existing
zoning ordinances. We would prefer larger lot sizes of 1 acre minimums but are seeking to
protect ourselves with this zoning of UR3.5 while the City of Spokane Valley writes our awn
Comprehensive Plan and adopts a broader variety of zoning designations to accommodate a
richer variety of lifestyles, more closely resembling the community that makes Spokane Valley
an attractive place to live.
WHAT ARE THE CHANGED CONDITIOAS OF THE AREA WHICH YOU FEEL MAKE THIS PROPOSAL
WARRANTED? This area has not changed, but areas nearby have dramatically increased In
population as developments have encroached around us. This has caused increased traffic on
all roads. Mission recently had a sewer line brought by a developer but the rest of the area is
still not part of the 6 year sewer plan. This hascreated an inequitable situation. Those with
money are purchasing public services at the expense of capacity that the general public on the
plan should have been receiving. Also, others desiring sewer, cannot develop their properties
and may be delayed even longer as capacity of our waste water treatment facility reaches
capacity 'oficially in 2009." One citizen should not receive special treatment over another for
public services,.
Present road conditions on the secondary roads such as Baldwin, Indiana, Montgomery,
Riverway, Long and Greenacres Road, are narrow and not well maintained. In winter, we are
not plowed on snow days. It usually stops at Mission, and days later we may have our streets
plowed. This will create more hazardous road conditions with the hundreds of new cars that
are expected to travel daily down these roads. Neighbors have already commented they have
had near misses with head on collisions when they have moved over on the road to
accommodate a bicyclist. Any reduction in homes will lessen the traffic and hopefully avert
more serious problems but I believe the roads are not up to the standards needed for any
significant increase in traffic.
Concurrency is demanded by GMA, UR 3.5 is the only zoning available to try to mitigate the
road problem that is being created. During summer months, slow moving vehicles such as
tractors and harvesting equipment utilize Flora and some of the other roads.
WHAT FACTORS SUPPORT THE ZONE RECLASSIFICATION?
CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: To quote the Short Course on
Planning, 'the perception or reality that existing roads cannot handle present traffic and that
they would be overtaxed by significant new levels of use - would be a barrier to increasing
densities In existing urban or suburban areas. The Comprehensive Plan demands that capital
facilities funding is provided for in the present. The courts have ruled that you cannot hold an
area's land indefinitely. There must be a clear need for those lands for housing and without
that It Is a taking of property that must be compensated. It is too early to know where the
people want to put our growth and what we want to preserve. The County Comprehensive Plan
7nNTN,' CENCI BCCI Tr'6TTniU &DDI ie' h1 Parvo 7 rdr 7.
•
requires a 4 house average per acre of new housing. The zoning would conform to this goal
while North Greenacres waits out this Interim period. -
The land use element of the plan and the finance piece of the capital facilities element
must be coordinated and consistent.
COMPLIANCE WITH PURPOSE AND INTENT OF ZONING: Zoning is to prevent urban
sprawl and must have capital facilities in place. Good planning would not initiate large
developments in an area without sewer services for the entire area. We need to have good
management of what already exists before we attempt to increase the population and traffic of
an area, Schools are full and there is a need for more schools. While there may not be enough
room for new students, by law schools cannot turn any student away and so we must not just
follow the letter of the law but the intent and purpose of insuring there is money and capacity
in the present school system. Otherwise, students that move into an area are bused outside of
their neighborhood and cannot begin making friends and their educational experience Is
interrupted by school moves beyond their physical move to an area.
Poor development standards may cause the larger community to bear the expense of
retrofitting the development to meet urban standards.
WHAT IMPACT WILL THE PROPOSED ZONE RECLASSIFICATION HAVE ON THE SURROUNDING
AREA?
It will be consistent with zoning adjacent to the South Boundary on Mission
WHAT MEASURES DO YOU PROPOSED TO MITIGATE YOUR PROPOSALS IMPACT ON
SURROUNDING LAND USE? Animal keeping should not be a variance since 71% of the area
support this use. We would like to see something created to permit this use, to be submitted
with the community comprehensive plan amendments if needed. Likely, this is a bureaucratic
decision that can be made at this time. The present zoning is injurious to the historical and
present land uses and deprives us of rights and privileges enjoyed by other properties in this
vicinity such as Otis Orchards and South Greenacres area. This is a takings that can be
rectified.
In addition the following measures should be enacted to mitigate the interim zoning that was
enacted to assist the proposed zoning.
in order to preserve the scenic view, 1 V2 story houses should also have a 10 foot setback so
there is not a visible wall created since that is the setback required of 2 story homes. Since It
_s more than one story, it should be treated as a 2 story not a single story structure.
7CiNTNIC. RFC'.AccTFrrarr.m ADM rrerrnr,r [Meia °�of
Setbacks should be a minimum of 10 to 12 feet if there is animal keeping on adjacent to the
proposed building project. This is to protect both neighboring property owners from harm to
one another, Fencing should be required of any PUD or housing development along the entire
perimeter of the development to protect the neighboring properties. The benefits to the local
area to continue agricultural use is of public interest. Residential development adjacent to
these lands should be advised that these uses shall not be considered a nuisance if conducted
and maintained according to beset farming and animal management practices. Informing new
or potential purchasers of the daily activities and potential "inconveniences" (i.e. dust, odors,.
machinery operation, sounds, etc.) would be helpful in maintaining a harmonious
neighborhood, while such notices do not have any real force of law. If one is determined to live
in an area that has these land uses they should be prepared to accept inconveniences or
discomfort as a normal and necessary aspect of living in an area with a rural character.
Definitions. Agricultural Operations means, but is riot limited to, the cultivation and tillage of
the sail, production, irrigation, frost protection, cultivation, growing, harvesting and processing
of any agricultural commodity, including viticulture, horticulture, timber or apiculture, the
raising of livestock and poultry, any agricultural practice or process, private or commercial,
performed as incident to or in conjunction with such operations, including recycling of
agricultural waste, preparation for ,market, delivery to storage or to carriers for transportation
to market. A Grievance Committee could be established to assist in the resolution of any
disputes that might arise regarding agricultural operations and the right to farm or use your
property. Electric fence should be encouraged and provided for in our zoning ordinances to
prevent damage to neighboring property and fences - since it discourages leaning on the fence
and does not pose any harm beyond a shock to any child or adult touching the fence. (Any
planner wishing to touch an electric fence as a trial is welcome to try.) Penalties for unlawful
interference, theft, trespassing, or vandalism to owners in agricultural pursuits should be
crested since a large majority of the area are grandfathered with these uses and should be
protected,
PART II
(For Staff Use Only)
DATE SUBMITTED; RECEIVED BY: ,
FILE NUMBER: _-- -
7cdurNt; par!AWeTKrra-rriar.i Au tsl t A rrrJJ Dann 4 nF C
Aerial Map
Ballot' - Abe `� _Euclid
m Eu --'-t .
. ' _.. ..ems+-.._ �:
r 1.
l3 a 4 � ! } `w
_ 1 �.
s
- , - r 40 '•". - - - '"- - ' ' 'Budkay a '
testi"t_ ' '--
, ' '4. -.' . r/ ' ' \. - '.'1'. '' -ill ' -J4,,j3IT,.__5'n — >
. - o- '.-0 glisi L ;' II
i
:P % bC3
' or. r,tl! . i `` ' tea.
J-!
1 Indian, ^fig°'' ter— I - p--tin -
� '� ..' I1_ $alttlu. , .Q-? . I p' Raldwi a ------ ...pie/ r
111 n
it.
I k
YI 6
I Imo .. 1 �. k
a r _ ..y��ulis5l4n _ � _ -" f�
Flare 1 _ ��' .q.1 a'i x
S
"S + I Pri 5I;It] 0
1 plana_- � I e AoV�1��.,.ra M
; rxdy.
---"-'--------.__.___ ' ' '' : 'Z''''- '' - --C staki 0
L3ic.riti Broadway
Bro� 1
�itaa+� h-
SpitSgfrbld.
Broadway `� -- -1 _ '7 b,
i
r
-.� _ I a ye
c3 I: +. I til1 .
1 OGv 1i n- --.0.0--jfr
„--
1
1 I_ 7
I.
Il_ 1`' Y"'ay_ - 5 tiz f t �P �14-f B lsywa�J�� _
It�;xrlr� Ir - ' rw
_ _1 ..
at
+ Greenacres Areawide Rezone �t„,
palanle
August, of .....001 ley
Comprehensive Plan Map
MI 4 *� �� = �
a.
1. .;. • iJJL1 4- 11M4 -0te: 51•
�d imam,—.iio ��
101
Ii I I I nt OTIIPPW I I I I � _�
liElarylrilll I _________,,--------- ../ ir_iff41.. "Itbs =.71itil woo inwil-,. - ,4,:kpc* ii Ibigii!A ..„„
F
.,.,„,0- Pli W
100 -_ --
.'0. ioLe.,r- -if Finti..11 5,,
,I pore, .0,019A, , ---.w.
i. ifir ,'.,?
F 1 .111!..71-44.0w
N o ,k''''f4X161:, el0. 111
, 1 . 0.,,,oirlffiro,dropit, 1.11,1.4{ OripillitA.SWrOiro" ,
Site t . Aid,Z . --4?"..4trzAiy •ririo,00 - ,..- Af>4 ,,,, 0 p.oliagip
Oire prel "
} ✓ I _ , rely"
yJ
/11 Ail V..,4, .40.#irjr A A rAr4 Ar..., AK A 07.,,,,,,,,„foryrorio affAte.0.111101.5{,‘As7
./ jr . iloldIrrirAllr p#1441014.1 OW eroweeer fore462. witatiT,A.
" •/ I r IBJ elosoI :00,......; ;;00,(4
— ` 0 "e in Zerei 4/,..-Or"-p-,:r ssW),-.)
14fri," II ,�, /..Angkor 41100151,'lrwiy e/ i til f rio/dolma 001-44.4 L�r 5
af� / 610/ '0,/+ +
frAT *i
:pr Keel F d t��. i. Y is 7 - y
a W-41.`,„.4, r / x4,64 = M.vir 4 =F t'
1049 .r.o A� :- J JO.Y lfJl�ll'•F� ran �1■�■■11. .5-
lk
Flom -- �— R�I�1rr
e+ mi M r r�.0111
_ + ����rsal� ri �Y{
r hull" tlN111� �1�� a m•
OM � '�r► �i;.fa■isr WA 11
11,0
�-��#��+tib1___ ..
air rat". _ 1.1..112111111621 0 �� ,:—
Cornp Plan Category r fir'_ -r ,.... ..a., q
n
lib, _
.4,,,
1 i Low Density Residential
^� ��e^�i 5
R Medium Density Resldenilal •— s ir' ,-.,,
Mg HO Density ResidanlfaT 'Alai. 9a op. l
N l I famed Use 11i. �""'~
4 4
WririlkilllY �I� IIIII� id
... �� rel ■, ,writ !LIL • 'iz I �' 1� ��
Community Center l � �t`� X1111111161111 *��■� rr
■ a- ' alrril 1�1■11■ar ��
L urban Activity Canter E ���'I�
- I hlelghborhood Cammerdai i, 1111117A: 1 f� �.4���Ir■-�I.
15116
Commonly Commercial ■�� ar� `` Waidaillil 1�■ l �.
Imo N 1 � r 1IKI �
Regional Commercial
tl�+ . (� 1
Llghlleduslria id Nam ` � ■ra. � I
00 .01.°1411
He ,+y Industrial ��� f . `w 'r , '" i, # ' 1si elv
h neralland mis a _ i 0 * l� sAii ; �r►�1■R'^
1MMIL + , 0
I��Irira�°°r+a1ltsr� .— 1� - h J _g..
r� Greenacres Areawide Rezone ,�,
-.!..r
'�� August, 2004 ��'
Zoning Map
at
6
i c. l
g 5
la
tol
re —I 44.04
.EMIt izim ix.i.z. iss,N,, F-11.41U
N.Wihmirtos '94 oil
111:14MVII*pi I 17,16-.1% romir4siirell alii!":=I k4:41.71410,111\111.1041116 Sq4,4k1
51716W24-W 11M11011.7 on* _ r.,...,x
1 sumarAi ilk ...idlers seatpi
WW1&4 16,20p„ ips
i ; mi .,, r„.1*&.,, 1
9:�
---=----=i --1 -1 r-.L.. or
-- *zi! �,�,,,, ,, rut
'l* i � 17,.x12:';liSlir r,1
ii ..._________Irsigi, . li
ipp.,., pi
,..ox 'f ,\NI v,41, erile,e..:01:e4 . ;04 I fot``'+.alp e,,l
r 04Y re /#/ '� i. M
Sit *41:114,
Ir t ! '�'0 r+� '. A of
•.6 '.�aaa
�r
i\i#,A7ArF A ,..■•'.-..... 114Lif 1°Plf,IffilL
44
a r Ar AK
s" • 1' •�f*i r rJ 0 4 IdivarsApr7,7erar,ettAhr,,,,,,,,,
il•±ter/ l'ilhla �l:
7,
,41
:, .:.':'.• :)..-. ':`-x- . / 4.1'MP"di°409 K2 or," A" VA,rd'Pfo ' culoAr,•••Ais
9114 1°AlrAf KA 101$I?.. 1100 111102-:19A FAA 6,1 ;>%1
•�' ~ i:Fi?.1IJ,�Y� � r�F � ravAr' Al �IA00 A�r,—�'/�I r �r���I� -ep�e�
oltgoi
. L. . -.I' \ ?frydr01 Mir , - . ;7.1001•4114 00 A AvArjj- r A AK pra_,T14,1401 ;i tel:;5,0V-r0.4 4
'•' '' '- - 10 4,0t ifikrir,5.:0
.. 44, viyi Approl par iosp.",
I. t; • orf.. r# rAril - 440
`� 0r(0 04.4 of "P II{rr
•
fie .F.ee•y. Fzo1J F �A ttodf Ail or, itx.11 d _' rrr . , • % o ,, 00,,,09„,' . ,
!T* Z "IJ
`� _■1 i 1
z,...z.kiWz.z,,,,"N‘z4,1,N,,,,LLL .gra 11 I fin• .ftp„' � �1�#I�
. 0\Zi; tilra ..13___,_-_,14,::
,
tiii, L4gend iS4,4 :14Vab."'salifiralat200117,
- I_ .1 ua-3.5 CsN,Ns.N., Nwt,\,") ' 41117111.4 NI IMIllitilW4: . 'Thi.,a__
177 u" 6441116': mm---- m\l' i' L--14V---'1--___ -----e---..... .,..,79,7_ , .
1 j uR,i2 mr.-0,m-'-.111. rag,.i g"I'm __________12 •,.. LL,'
111•111111110 111111..10- 1
�� 7 , 111
`I 1U1'1111111 1160 1Rrn111u1�■ 11:I ��1���
11111111h111111111111111M114141Ib^rtr�■■�ESI
alt �.�� li21 EZZI 11-2 All 3 NUMMI Mil :mipaii•mm, 111 ,,
■�i �� i, I� ,,, Lir + M i
�� ,. `t� in 4.,_ �1Ei. we . x11a
I R711-2 .1: ,..
9- In 1.� 'WI.R 11,11!",;40:.
11 4KA 1.neM.V41111
e*:
11.im 1 p ,;1'94 taoilifizt 1?-46, 1i. idol i
,,. ..I WE ,._g,wilwVwp..illilld,iintim m Irff�� 4 ��;-�' * " � F1
,7- irr .ii,siiimmiriezei:tmov:i.-5.0,0w4.---- inairtfre.grarid-VMPPNIPOPRISEPPIER l'.Si
Greenacres Areawide Rezone
pvin '
- August, 20D4 4000alley
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission - Public Hearing Planning Commission - Public Hearing
September 23, 2004 September 23, 2004
c o9
-_„„___-_-_,___
_ ._Print): s .' F I . 1 -__t I_ `w_ -~ . , i Name (Please Print): __, t - -)1Z-.'_ -/%4
, - , ,
Name (Please
L' �- - ; .. Address: - .—!
Address: dd - ., -_
y
Agenda Item: ,.
Agenda Item: - .
CA/For Proposal ❑ For Proposal
❑ Opposed to Proposal Opposed to Proposal
❑ Neutral 0 Neutral
Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes ❑f No Wish to Speak:] Yes ❑ No
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission - Public Hearing
Planning Commission - Public Hearing September 23, 2004
September 23, 2004
Name (Please Print):
Name (Please Print): 1\-'/I, , ., _°..-"4. - _,' +fes
Address: - i._._ e r,[.Ci - - -- - Address:
Agenda Item:
Agenda Item: ` _ - ' - ` ` ',
I JFor Proposal
EI For Proposal
❑ Opposed tv Proposal
❑ Opposed to Proposal
0 Neutral
❑ Neutral
„--. Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes 0 No
Seo. 23, 20, 4 4: 2aFMi No. 0009 N. 2
RECEVED
,41, t SEP 13 2004
1 117 East 35'h Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99203 City of Spokane VaHey
(509) 838-9066
Fax: (509) 838-9051
September23, 2004
Planning Commission
City of Spokane Valley
11707 5,. Sprague Ave., Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Re: Greenacres Area-Wide Rezone
Lots N Laud, L.L.C.Properties
Dear Commissioners:
I represent Lots N Land, L.L.C.,which OWLS property within the area proposed.to he rezoned from
UR 7* to 3.5; specifically, parcel numbers 55073.0715, 55073.1235 and 55074.0303. Lots N
Land requests that the Planning Commission not rezone these parcels as part of the rezone.
My client recently received preliminary plat approval for parcel number 55073.0715, and parcels
55073.1235 and 55074.0303 are the subject of preliminary plat applications, and are vested to be
reviewed under the zoning in effect today. Therefore,any rezone ofthe property as part of the area-
'wide rezone would have no practical effect. However,my client would like the zoning to remain
UR-7 in order to be consistent with the pending applications anticipated approval of the same.
Thank you for your consideration of this request. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to contact me. f
Very,ltrul�yr yours,
/ I f
(23.,
•
cc: Ken Tupper
September 19 2004
Dear Mr. Kuhta,
We would ask that Spokane Valley Planning Commission deny File No. ArewideRt�A�"
Submitted by Applicant, Mary Pollard, representing property owners signing petition, requesting
a zone change from UR-7 to UR.3.5 .
We've had 3 developments recently approved for UR-7 in this particular area and believe the remaking
49% of the property owners would be discriminated against if this re-zone request is approved.
The 51 % of the property owners who are requesting the zone change from 15R-7 to 3.5 der not need a
zone change to keep their individual properties at 3.5.
Spokane Valley City, which incorporated in 2003, would decrease their revenue if this re-zoning request
is allowed to be changed from UR-7 . Keeping the zoning at UR-7 will increase the city's tax base in the
coming years We would rather see the tax base raised by single family homes instead of increasing our
taxes, cutting services and eliminating programs.
By keeping the UR-7 zoning, the tax base increase will also kelp with the improvements for schools
and the road system in this 457 acre area.
We would ask if you do grant this re-zone request, we would ask that it only be granted for 1 year and
no longer. We would also request that the boundary stop at Flora Road making Flora the west boundary.
Sincerely,
Hous
.-0
el
yne House
17486 E Montgomery Ave_
Greenacres, Wash 99016
509-928-5807
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission w Public Comment Planningission -er 231P2004
ublic Comment
September 23, 2004
ame (Please Print): k /ow
Name (Please Print): 7
/:20
(11
ddress: c Address'
Ai fel
C a
-- , , ubject 'S,_ 6Pr e
!Abject: a , ,
__Car Z 0 .001 /62-/r1-"(--- <
Wish to Speak. 0 Yes Nt. No Wish to Speak: Yes 0 No
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission - Public Comment
September 23, 2004
Name (Please Print): I .0 a Address: TO er �s r
Subject: '`' - At ;
01-, i2 1r`
{
Wish to Speak: E Yes No
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission — Public Hearing
September 23, 2004
Name Please Print): Y7 C/411
Address: / /01) ,
Agenda Item! f7 - y-
---12 -for Proposal
❑, Opposed to Proposal
E] Neutral
Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes `-- Na
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission - Public Hearing
September 23, 2004
v
Name (Please Print):
Address: ,: (-32_ - _r P,-C-i
Agenda item: a t - l - ,
For Proposal
El Opposed to Proposal
Neutral
Wish to Sneak! Vac I—II+
Scott kuhta
7
From: John Bowditch [trlpletzr yehoo.corn]
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 4:47 PM
To: Scott Ku hta
Subject: File NC_Areawide Rezone-01-04
Mr Kuhta,
I live in this proposed rezone area. I own two lots
approx. 4 acres in size. I have lived in this area
since 1992. I believe it is in the best intrent of our neighborhood to see this rezone
gain approval from the Spokane Valley Planning Commission. This area consist of many hones
with large lots or acerage, peole maintain livestock on their properties and commercial
agraculture still exsist here. Many of the residents of this area have been here for many
years and remain because of our rural style env_ornment_
This area is on the edge of the growth TTanayemen_
boundaries and rezoning to UR 3.5 would be more
=potable with properties outside the boundaries, and
would also act as a buffer between the higher density
areas to the south and east.
I also believe that the road system in this area is
not capable of handling traffic from a UR--7
deoignation. Also, the Spokane River which is the
northern boundary of this area is already facing
ecological problems, to restrict building in this area
to UR 3.5, would be a victory to help save our
precious river from further degradation.
I support a UR 3.5 designation for this neighborhood.
The necessary signatures of property owners within
this area were collected. Their collective voice is
telling you what we want in our neighbor. It is vital
for city officals to listen to what the citizens ask
for.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this
issue
John S4wditch
17725 R. Montgomery Ave.
Spokane Valley, WA.
Do you Yahoo!?
Declare ?ourself - Register online to vote today! httra:f/vote.yahoo.com
1
i'14:
4210,6 N-Z-17 '/-3:Ze4eFftd-:
17
t
+•cd- /ed "e41"
de,14Ae-- a-4ffe V tefLe,
6761-r,e2) a-c-,L44,i
, e-t-° "A 0-, "Ift2"44j-
! A 't- a{' J_ eiremi",ei.,taer_.,Le-1
y • lr Y r
-6;(4 airai-eV
r .
v /65freof-e4A)2
eec*,- a.re ,/
>A11-r-e y ok,„i
Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Approximately l 1 years ago, Spokane County rezoned our neighborhood to SR 3.5 east
of Flora Rd. and to Industrial west of Flora Rd.( even though there is no industry in our
neighborhood). The neighborhood fought to change the zoning to something more in
keeping with the area and lifestyle. We were rezoned to SR 1.
In or around 2001 without our knowledge and with no notice Spokane County changed
our zoning to SR 7 (the County said that they mailed notices,however not one person in
our neighborhood says that they received them).
SR 7 is not appropriate for our semi-rural area The lots vary from ' acre to
approximately 20 acres. There are some small farms and many people keep large and
small farm animals. The roads are too narrow for the number of cars that high-density
housing would bring.
Most of us moved to this area looking for a semi-rural lifestyle. We know that in time it
will change,however we are being forced to accept high-density housing when there
many other areas where this housing would more appropriate.
- Areas closer to the freeway and to arterials.
Areas closer to shopping.
- Existing areas already zoned for high-density housing.
We think that rezoning our area to SR 3.5 would be a good compromise. The area south
of Mission Ave. is zoned SR 3.5 yet is closer to the freeway.
Pat and Bob Loweree
E. 16908 Indiana Ave,
Phone #926-2551
.. ..
L--...--:::-.:.,..„:
,Ll F d.E F haw S
, SEP 2 3 21304
GARY ft LAuRiE HOPKINS
13D6 North Long Roan City O f Spoken V iiey
Oreenacres, WA 99016
11,
i(iiiSeptember 22, 2.004
i
Mr. Scott Kuhta
City of Spokane Valtey, WA
Dear Mr. Kuhta:
On behalf of the undersigned, this Letter is to show support for the proposed rezoning of 457 acres from
LIR7 to UR3.5 in the area bordered approximately by Mission Ave. to the south and the Spokane River to
the north, and by FLora Road to the west anrd barker Road to the east, as petitioned by Mary Pollard.
Residents whose signatures appear below Live in or around the neighborhood. We support the proposed
rezoning to ensure that our neighborhoods remain as rural as possible, and that fewer homes will be built
in the area. We are concerned not only about the additional traffic and congestion that further
development in the area is bringing, but also in the extreme changes in the look and feel of our idyllic
neighborhoods.
Thank you for taking our support into consideration,
Sincerely,
Signature Print Name Address
al
s r _ _ 1
i 1
j — #.' - 0 ^} } I)r it _ f '
irT
I 1 yCJ e
,f ag Al * 8- of
r l-- C
J
Illk
, l 4 Ct_t
• 91�rll (LL :� ' rC ' 1 L� N. Lc1 . rt4
.
morm�� .
� . _1 mai) _ I 0 '. G 1 0r
GARY Et LAURIE 1HOPKLNS
1306 North Long Road
Greenacres, WA 49016
Signatur= " Print 1'1'me P f Address
• d IP O
PrZ4.71,9107(<' PC-.1.11061\ -
• V LOC\ f
-�. i
City of Spokane Valley
Request for Planning Commission Review
DATE: September 23, 2004
TYPE:
❑ Consent ❑ Old Business New Business Public Hearing
❑ Legislation ❑ Information ❑ Administrative Report
AGENDA ITEM TITLE: 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments - Public Hearing
GOVERNING LEGISLATION Interim Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan
PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN: None
BACKGROUND: The City of Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan provides for an annual
Comprehensive Plan amendment process. The deadline for submitting Comprehensive Paan amendment
requests was July 1, 2004. The City received eight requests summarized as follows:
File No. CPA-01-04
Location: South side of Dishman-Mica Road, west of its intersection with Bowdish Road.
Request: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to Community
Commercial; corresponding Zoning Map amendment from UR-3.5 and 8-3 to B-2, Community
Commercial, on approximately 4.23 acres of land.
File No. CPA-02-04
Location: North side of Broadway Avenue, east of Ella Road.
Request: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to High Density
Residential: corresponding Zoning Map amendment from UR-3.5 to UR-22 on approximately 1.4 acres of
land.
File No. CPA-03-04
Location: South side of Springfield Avenue, west of Sullivan Road, one block north of Vallcyeray.
Request: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Medium Density to High Density Residential;
corresponding Zoning Map amendment from UR-7 and B-2 to LIR-22 an approximately 1.45 acres of
land.
File No. CPA-04-04
Location: South side of Broadway Avenue, about 4000 feet east of Sullivan Road.
Request: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to High Density
Residential; corresponding Zoning Map amendment from UR-3.5 to UR-22 on approximately 4.85 acres
of land.
File No. CPA-05-04
Location° North side of Valleyway Avenue, about 150 feet east of Sullivan Road.
Request: Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment from Low Density Residential to Regional Commercial;
corresponding Zoning Map amendment from UR-22 to B-1 or approximately 1.75 acres of land.
File No. CPA06--04
Location: East side of Adams Road, about 400 feet south of Mission Avenue,
Request: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to High Density
Residential; corresponding Zoning Map amendment from UR-3.5 to UR-22 on approximately a acres of
land.
File No. CPA-07-04
Lotion: The proposal will remove Mansfield Avenue, between Houk Street and Mirabeau Parkway,
from the Spokane Valley Arterial Road Plan.
Request Amend the Spokane Valley Arterial Road Plan by removing Mansfield Avenue between Houk
Street and Mirabeau Parkway-
File No. CPA-08-04
Location: North of Rutter Road, west of Dora Avenue, on the southeastern boundary of Felts Field
Airport,the only Airport property Iodated within the City of Spokane Valley.
Request: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial;
corresponding Zoning Map amendment from UR-3.5 to 1-2 on approximately 10 acres of land.
ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report, application materials,vicinity,zoning and comprehensive plan maps
far each request.
STAFF CONTACT: Scott Kuhta, AICP, Planner
STAFF REPORT
I " * SUBJECT: 2004 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
Community Development Department
isios•V Va 1 y
PLANNING DIVISION
To: Spokane Valley Planning Commission
Hearing Date: September 23, 2004
Staff: Greg McCormick, AICP — Planning Division Manager
Scott Kuhta, AICP— Senior Planner
Marina Sukup, AICP—Community Development Director
I. BACKGROUND
The Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle
that runs from July 2" to July f 51 of the following year. Applications received prior to July
1st are considered by the Planning Commission in August and September, with a
recommendation forwarded to the City Council in late September or early October. A
decision by the City Council is to be made no later than December of each year.
All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The
Community Development Department received 7 requests for site-specific Comprehensive
Plan amendments and one request for an Arterial Road Plan amendment for 2004. Sites
that are approved for a Comprehensive Plan amendment will automatically receive a
zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation.
Attachments to this report include application materials, SEPA documentation, land use,
zoning and aerial maps to assist the Commission's review,
II, NOTICE
Notice for the proposed amendments was placed in the Spokane Valley News Herald on
September 3, 2004 and each site was posted with a "Notice of Land Use Application" sign,
which included a map and description of the proposal and a State Environmental Policy
Act (SEPA) determination. Finally, individual notice of the proposals was mailed to all
property owners within 400 feet of each amendment.
III. SEPA REVIEW
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA— RCW 43.21 C) environmental
checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Under
SEPA, amendments to the comprehensive plan are considered "non-project actions" which
Staff Report 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
are defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain
standards controlling use or modification of the environment Additional environmental
review may be required for the actual development of the subject properties.
Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for
each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Nonsignificance (DNS)
were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on August 25, 2004. The
DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on September 3, 2004 consistent
with the City of Spokane Valley Environmental Ordinance.
IV. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSALS
CPA-01-04
Applicant: Warren and Sylvia Riddle
Request: Change the land use designation from Low-Density Residential to Community
Commercial; change zoning from B-3 and UR 3.5 to B-2.
Location: South side of Dishman-Mica Road, west of Bowdish Road; Parcel No.
45333,9024 and 9155.
Site Area: 423 acres
Current Use: The site is largely vacant, but does include a single-family residence and a
commercial office.
Adjacent Uses: Railroad to the south, commercial to the north and east, vacant
residential to the west.
Public Facilities: The property is currently served with public water and sewer and is
accessed from a Dishman-Mica Road, a Principal Arterial on the Spokane Valley Arterial
Road Plan.
Comprehensive Planizoning Analysis: The Bowdish/Dishman Mica Road intersection
has developed as a commercial center over the years. This is reflected on the Interim
Spokane Valley Land Use Map by the Community Commercial land use designation for
property at the intersection. The proposal would extend the Community Commercial
designation northwest along Dishman-Mica Road. The Applicant requests that the
property be designated Community Commercial, consistent with property to the north and
east.
A portion of the subject property was zoned B-3 in 1993; the remainder of the property' is
zoned UR 3.5. The small parcel directly east of the subject property, at the southwest
September 15, 2003 Page 2 of 10
Staff Report 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
corner of BowdishlDishman Mica Road, was zoned B-1 in 1997. Property directly across
Dishman-Mica Road to the north is zoned B-3.
The Applicant requests that the entire property be zoned B-2, including the portion
currently zoned B-3. The B-2 designation is the appropriate implementing zone for the
Community Commercial Comprehensive Plan designation,
Public Comment: Staff has received no letters concerning the proposal to date.
Staff Recommendation;
Change property to Community Commercial and zone entire property B-2. The property is
not suited for residential use due to railroad adjacent to southern parcel boundary and the
busy arterial intersection.
GPA-02-04
Applicant: Robert G. Curry
Request: Change land use designation from Low Density Residential to High Density
Residential; change zoning from UR-3.5 to UR-22.
Location: North side of Broadway Avenue, east of Ella Road; Parcel No. 45812.9035.
Site Area: 1.4 acres
Current Use: The property has one, single-family dwelling located on it,
Adjacent Uses: A construction company office is located on the parcel directly west on
Broadway Avenue; single story apartments are located west and north of the property; a
single-family dwelling is located to east; Centennial Middle School is located across Ella
Road to the west.
Public Facilities: The subject property is located within Spokane County Water District#
3. The area was severed by Spokane County in 1996; access is via Broadway Avenue,
which is designated as a Principal Arterial.
Comprehensive PlanlZoning Analysis: The current land use designation for the subject
and surrounding property is Low Density Residential. This designation is not consistent
with the existing office and multi-family apartment uses surrounding the subject parcel.
The subject property is zoned UR 3.5; properly surrounding the site is zoned UR-22, which
is consistent with current office and mult%family uses. The single--family dwelling located
east of the subject is zoned UR-3,5.
Public Comment: Staff has received no letters concerning the proposal to date.
September 15, 2003 Page n of 10
Staff Report 2004 Comprehensive Man Amendments
Staff Recommendation: Change the Comprehensive Plan designation to High Density
Residential for the subject property and the properly surrounding the subject that is
currently zoned UR-22. Staff also recommends changing the zone of the subject parcel to
UR-22.
CPA-03-04
Applicant: Pring Corporation (represented by Dwight Hume)
Request: Change the land use designation from Medium Density Residential to i-ligh
Density Residential; change zone from UR-7 and R-2 to UR-22. The Applicant indicates
that the site would be an ideal location for a medical office facility and that the current
Comprehensive Plan designation would not allow for medical offices,
Location: South side of Springfield Avenue, west of Sullivan Road, one block north of
Valleyway; parcels No. 45144,0245,
Site Area: 1 A5 acres
Current Use: Vacant
Adjacent Uses: Property to the east, fronting Sullivan Road, is commercial retail; single-
family residences are located to the north across Springfield Road; a Vera Water and
Power pump house is located to the west; Progress Elementary is located approximately
200 feet further west.
Public Facilities: Water is available from Vera Water and Power; public sewer is
available. Springfield Road is an unpaved local access street. Future development on the
subject parcel would require Springfield to be paved.
Comprehensive PlanlZoning Analysis: The interim Comprehensive Plan designates the
subject property Medium Density Residential, which is intended as a buffer between the
commercial uses along Sullivan and single-family residential neighborhoods to the east.
Property to the east, fronting Sullivan, is designated Regional Commercial and is zoned B--
2; property directly north, south and west is designated Medium Density residential on the
Interim Comprehensive Plan map. Property to the south is zoned UR-22 while property to
the west and north is vaned UR-7_ The site has good to Sullivan Road and Commercial
services,
The requested Comprehensive Plan designation would allow for office and multi-family
development under the implementing UR-22 zone. These uses would be compatible with
current uses surrounding the property.
Public Comment: Staff has received no letters concerning the proposal to date.
September 15, 2003 Page 4 of 10
Staff Report 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends changing the Comprehensive Plan
designation to High Density Residential and implementing with the UR-22 zone.
CPA-04-04
Applicant: Paul H. Gillespie, Jr.
Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential;
change zone to UR-22.
Location: South side of Broadway Avenue, about 4000 feet east of Sullivan Road;
Parcel No. 45134.0206.
Site Area: 4.85 acres
Current Use: The property has one, single-family residence located on it.
Adjacent Uses: The property is surrounding by largely vacant, single-family residential
land on the south side of Broadway; property on the north side of Broadway includes
single-family and duplex units.
Public Facilities: Public water is provided by Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19.
Sewer is not currently available at the property. Future development of the site would
either require public sewer or interim septic systems until public sewer is available.
Access is via Broadway Avenue.
Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The Interim Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map
designates the subject parcel and surrounding property Low Density Residential. Policies
in the Land Use Chapter encourage High Density Residential areas to be designated near
commercial areas with good access to Major Arterials. The site is located within close
proximity to the Sullivan Road commercial district. However, Broadway Avenue is a
narrow, two-lane road designated as a Minor Arterial.
The Comprehensive Plan also requires the development of regulations that establish
design standards for multifamily developments_ The intent of this policy is to better
integrate multifamily developments adjacent to single-family neighborhoods. The design
standards would specify building heights and design features to give a residential scale
and identity to multifamily developments.
Spokane Valley has not adopted design standards that would address compatibility
between multi-family developments and single-family neighborhoods. Further, Spokane
Valley is currently in the process of developing a new Comprehensive Plan. Caution
should be used in making Land Use decisions that may be contrary to the direction of the
community planning process.
September 15, 2003 Page 5 of 10
Staff Report 2004 Compreherisive Plan Amendments
The property is currently zoned UR 3,5 which is consistent with surrounding uses and
current Comprehensive Plan designation.
Public Comment: Staff has received no letters concerning the proposal to date.
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends no change to the current Comprehensive
Plan designation. The area is surrounded by large, undeveloped parcels of land with
limited infrastructure available to support higher densities. The area should be reviewed
during the City's Comprehensive Plan process with community input into the design of the
Land Use Plan.
CPA-05-04
Applicant: Vernon Eden and David Wheldon
Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to Regional Commercial;
change zone from UR-22 to B-1
Location: North side of!alleyway Avenue, about 150 feet of Sullivan Road; Parcel No's
45133.0524 and 0540.
Site Area: 1.75 acres
Current Use: Each parcel is occupied with a single-family dwelling.
Adjacent Uses: Residential to the east, vacant to the north, a Vera utility station to the
west, commercial strip mall across Valleyway to the south.
Public Facilities: The property has public sewer available; water is provided by Vera
Water and Power; sewer is provided by Spokane County. Access to the site is from
Valleyway Avenue, a two lane road designated as an Urban Collector,
Previous Land Use/Zoning Actions: The subject property received a zone change to
UR-22 in 2000.
Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The subject site is located adjacent to property
designated Regional Commercial to the west, along Sullivan Road, and south, across
Valleyway. The Interim Comprehensive Plan states that Regional Commercial areas are
intended to draw customers from the City and outlying areas and accessible from
roadways of major arterial classification or higher.
At the time of application, the Interim Spokane Valley Zoning Code required B-3 and B-2
properties to have direct access to either a Minor or Major arterial. Valleyway is
designated as a Collector on the Arterial Road Plan map. Planning Staff advised the
applicant to request B-1 zoning, which could be approved with access to a Collector.
September 15,2003 Page 6 of 10
Staff Report 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
However, the Zoning Code was amended recently and the requirement for B-3 and B-2
zones to have access to a Minor or Major arterial was deleted. Therefore, the Planning
Commission may consider zoning the parcel B-2. The requested Regional Commercial
designation and proposed B-2 zoning is consistent with property directly across Valleyway
to the south and along Sullivan to the west.
Public Comment: Staff has received no letters concerning the proposal to date.
Staff Recommendation: Planning Staff recommends changing the property to Regional
Commercial and applying the B-2 zone. Staff further recommends no further commercial
zoning east of the subject property along Valleyway.
C PA-06-04
Applicant: Crosby Family Land, L.LC
Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential;
change zoning from UR 3.5 to UR-22. The application states the intent to develop the
property into an adult living/assisted living facility.
Location: l=ast side of Adams Road, approximately 400 feet south of Mission Avenue;
Parcel No. 45141.9003.
Site Area: 8 acres
Current.Use: The property is vacant.
Adjacent Uses: The site is surrounded by single-family residential development.
Public Facilities: Vera Water and Power provides water service; public sewer available.
The site is accessed by Adams Road which is a Local Access street on the Interim
Spokane Valley Arterial Road Plan,
Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The area surrounding the subject parcel is
exclusively single-family residential. The nearest high density development is north,
across Mission Road.
The Interim Comprehensive Plan encourages multi-family residential development to be
located near commercial areas and on sites with good access to major arterials. The
nearest commercial services are along Sullivan Road, approximately one-half mile to the
east. Adams Road is a narrow, two-lane collector without sidewalks or shoulders for
pedestrians.
The Comprehensive Plan also requires the development of regulations that establish
design standards for multifamily developments. The intent of this policy is to better
integrate multifamily developments adjacent to single-family neighborhoods. The design
September 15, 2003 Page 7 of 10
Staff Report 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
standards would specify building heights and design features to give a residential scale
and identity to multifamily developments.
Spokane Valley has not adopted design standards that would address compatibility
between multi-family developments and single-family neighborhoods. Further, Spokane
Valley is currently in the process of developing a new Comprehensive Plan. Caution
should be used in making Land Use decisions that may be contrary to the direction of the
community planning process_
Public Comment: Staff received a letter dated September 14, 2004, signed by area
residents opposing the proposed Comprehensive Plan change. Staff also received an
email from Peggy and Richard Cannon opposing the change (letter and email attached).
Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends no change to the current Comprehensive
plan designation. The application states the intent to construct an adult livinglassisted
living facility. However, it is not possible to condition approval of a Comprehensive Plan
Amendment to limit development to the stated intent. The UR-22 zone would potentially
allow 172 dwelling units to be developed on the 8-acre site, which would negatively impact
the single-family neighborhood. The site could accommodate approximately 32 single-
family residences under the UR 3.5 zone.
The area should be reviewed during the City's Comprehensive Plan process with
community input into the design of the Land Use Plan for this neighborhood.
CPA-07-04
Applicant; Todd R. Whipple, P.E.
Request: Amend the Interim Spokane Valley Arterial Road Plan by removing Mansfield
Avenue between Houk Street and Mirabeau Parkway. The application indicates that other
options will be available that won't require Mansfield Avenue to be constructed per the
Arterial Road Pian. The Applicant proposes to replace Mansfield with Houk Street
extended south to Indiana, which would require a new railroad crossing (see application
documents for full details). The Applicant further suggests that the Bridging the Valley
project would remove this segment of railroad some time between 2009 and 2012_
According to a letter by Christopher R. Ashenbrener, Corporate Counsel for A & A
Construction (see application materials) Mansfield Avenue was ''casually proposed" to be
extended easterly as a traffic fix for problems along the Pines Road corridor during
development project discussions. The intent was to provide for eastlwest traffic flow
without impacting the Pines/Indiana intersection. Extending Mansfield west to Pines would
require the purchase and demolition of a 6-plex apartment building.
Mr. Ashenbrener further states in his letter that the extension of Mansfield would be
extremely burdensome because it would bisect a residential community planned for the
area between Mirabeau Parkway and Houk Street.
September 15, 2003 Page 8 of 10
stiff Report 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Site Area: The undeveloped portion of Mansfield Avenue measures approximately 2000
feet.
Current Land Use: The western end of the Mansfield alignment consists of multi-family
residential development; the eastern end consists of office, commercial and recreational
uses. Property in the middle is currently vacant, with a multi-family residential
development in process of approval.
Comprehensive Plan Analysis: The Arterial Road Plan Map is a part of the
Transportation Element of the Interim Spokane Valley Comprehensive Plan. The map
identifies current and future roads that are required to support the future land uses
envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. Mansfield Avenue was added to the Arterial Road
Plan in the late 1990's as an important eastlwest link from Pines Road to Mirabeau
Parkway. The future road will provide for better traffic circulation in this area and is an
important link to the Pines/Mansfield/Montgomery Road realignment project (Pines Road
Corridor Project).
The Pines/Mansfield Mitigation Project is scheduled for construction in 2005. Part of that
project would improve Mansfield Road west of Pines, moving east bound traffic crossing
Pines to the north. This will alleviate congestion at the current Montggornery/Pines
intersection. Constructing Mansfield east of Pines Road will then allow connection through
Mirabeau Parkway. It should be noted that Mansfield Avenue is currently being extend
both east and west of Mirabeau Parkway for new developments, consistent with the
Arterial Road Plan.
The Bridging the Valley project will remove the rail line paralleling Indiana Avenue;
however, the right-of-way will not be vacated, The entire project is expected to be
completed by 2015, if funding is secured.
The most applicable goals of the Comprehensive Plan are:
Goal T_7 Provide efficient and cost effective movement of *ea,•le moods and fre s ht to
maintain industrial commercial and manufacturin' caeabili
The future Mansfield Road is an important link in the City's transportation system that will
provide better circulation between the light industrial areas west of Pines and residential
areas north of Pines to the Valley Mall office parks east of Pines.
Goal T.Ba Establish and maintain level of services standards for roads.
Level of service is currently failing at the Pines/MontgomeryfMansfieldllndiana
intersections. The proposed Pines Road Corridor project will maintain adequate levels of
service in this area. Construction of Mansfield Road east of Pines will remove more cars
from the Pines/Indiana intersection, which will help to maintain level of service standards.
September 15, 2003 Page 9 of 10
Staff Report 2004 Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Public Comment: Staff has received no letters concerning the proposal to date.
Staff Recommendation: Community Development and Public Works Staff recommends
denial of the proposed Arterial (toad Plan change (see letter from Sandra Raskell, P.E.,
Spokane Valley Development Review Engineer). Extension of Mansfield Avenue would
provide traffic relief from Indian Avenue and connectivity of the City street system.
CPA-08-04
Applicant; City of Spokane Valley
Request: Change the land use designation from Low-Density Residential to Light
Industrial; change zoning from UR-3.5 to 1-2.
Location: North of Rutter Road, west of Dora Avenue, on the southeastern boundary of
Felts Field, the only portion of Airport property located within the City of Spokane Valley.
Site Area: 10 acres
Current Use: The site is developed with airplane hangars and storage facilities.
Adjacent Uses: Single family residential to the east.
Public Facilities: The site has public sewer and water available and is accessed from
Rutter Road.
Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The current Low Density Residential
designation is not consistent with the use of the airport property. The City of Spokane
Valley signed an interlocal agreement with the City of Spokane and Spokane County that
which states that development of airport property must be consistent with the Felts Field
Airport Master Plan. The agreement further states that the Master Plan supercedes the
City's zoning of the property.
Staff Recommendation:
Change property to Light Industrial and zone 1-2, consistent with current uses.
V. ATTACHMENTS
Attached to this Staff Report are application materials, zone maps,
comprehensive plan maps, aerial maps and letters submitted to date.
September 15,2003 Page 10 of 10
CPA -01 -04
FILE NO. CPti`6 -0
001119
SjG1iie City of Spokane Valley Application fori;i0001MOT RECEIVED
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
PART I APR 2 3 2111
SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT or
APPLICANT -- COMMUNITY RFVELORr nlr
NAME: > L__ , PHONE: 5 g --6,p,/7
ADDRESS: f / ., .4 t 12- ," 1 EMAIL: eu -doge(- Ira.lfei-,N- •ad i,,_
CITY/STATE/ZIP: .. 1 `' FAX: eirf,p e-gegS?
PROPERTY OWNER 1 (IF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT)
NAME: e_ - _ PHONE:
ADDRESS: EMAIL:
CITY/STATE/ZIP: Eisx:
PROPERTY OWNER=MORE THAN TWO PROPERW OWNERS,ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET)
I—,, --
{ PHONE: I
ADDRESS: 1 dEMAIL,:
CITY/STATE/ZIP: I FAX:
AGENT/CONSULTANT/ATTORNEY
NAME: ' PHONE:
I ADDRESS: --- a 4. . EMAIL.
I CITY/STATE/ZIP FAX:
LAND USE MAP CHANGE FROPOSAL:
1 CURRENT DESIGNATIOFI _ PROPOSED DESIGNATION
fLAND USE MAP +oW -Alii- '- LL A. a 1. 61-6,21,110tC4 4
ZONING MAP 'B r S
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY CHANGE PROPOSAL(ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY '.
CURRENT POLICY .
i
PROPOSED N
POLICY
OFFICE USE ONLY: L City Initiateditizen Initiated
Concurrency Review equired o Yes IP I
Gate Received: „ _Lt Received By: 4 ,` If _;
1 iMi2.03 Page 1 of 5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission - Public Hearing
September 23. 2004
•
Name (Please Print), Ly 1 R.# 4
Address:
Agenda Item: P 0..
D_ For Proposal
Q Opposed to Proposal
Neutral
Wish to Speak: D Yes ❑ No
PART I
LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE
(Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
I, it) c& 4' kcecke , (print name) SWEAR DR AFFIRM THAT
THE ABOW RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA
PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER,
ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF,
ADDRESS: _/. i E 1C.; ( a i1 -.00C.Zet kW PHONE: 9& c / 7
par 4 ZIP: °9 G
je (City) (State)
i-.42,,,::? o
(Signature) (Da
NOTARY
STATE OFWASHINGTON ) ss:
STATE
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN! to before me this ay of � , 201j
NOTARY SEAL
Y-_- g "t� NOTARY SIGNATURE
' "i� Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
cam 140 ARY 09 i
j ; Residing at: �,L ' Li%- t �•LA
n" � . � 2
1li ' _____,*PuaLte 0, I —
My appointment expires:_i_042402_
%a WAS ' -
I i14!2CO3 Page 2 of 5
PART 111
S TE DATA
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA(ACRES OR SQ. FT.)
ADJACENT ARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED (ACRES CR SQ,FT.) 1 -
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY:
SCHOOL DISTRICT' ,e41,10:4.1 £ i/ej
FIRE'DisTRicT: _ A-L'. 4
WATER DISTRICT: a,, A., dap S 3
NEIGHBORHOOD IOOD AssocIATION:
PUBLIC CR PRIVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY `- n c r TTk11
WIDTH OF PROPERTY'FRONTING PUBLICJPRIVATE ROAD: -I- ,_
ACCESS TO EXISTING OR PLANNED ARTERIAL?{Y/N) - Ye-s
NAME OF ARTERIAL ROADS: I. 4 A `J , 4.A
3 - . 49 0 /5
PREVIOUS ZONING/LAND USE DFCiS1ON
DIST PREVIOUS PLANNING ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY':
Ae4e ICA /
CHANGED CONDITIONS __
WHAT ARE THE CHANGES CONDITIONS V"HICHWARRANTS THIS PROPOSED CHANGE?
a 1L.. 4 ,i"' 6,1 g i7+Uf.�l[� C nom`J 'd 5 e1'te .S
` rrc tl t 1714 r e. 6/0- c -ri I CJ�+ sta}cf
lay.
`- d•kit ,s 5avado w 4. r .;2re a A,4
A boii:t 'A, of 7)(e ert &ON'Oa 41./t- c5, -Z6
11/442DD3 Page 3 of 5
PROPOSAL
PRcVIDE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
4„*.e
-24e)- .1fra-ded
,be lido,ped 60-,44.E Ate4so („5-)
ADJACENT LAND USES
DESCRIBE EXISTING LAND 135ESWITH ill THE VICINITY OF PRoPOSA'L
Lit)2-5 Seoc s + L . `1 to r
— cl reitArco ier,Aceti
e€. Gtic +, C e 1 1/4-T V`eg_e— _6 e 6064 eUEL/ cx(i)', h
2 LC—I\ a f 1 Lvoct_ —Fr-
1142003
r-
111412003 Page 4 of 5
.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY
DESCRIBE How PROPOSAL IS CCNSISTENTWITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN—CITE SPECIFIC GOALS/POLICIES:
p4
C C r7L o t,Lt n 1+'Ne lr h - 611- -
At,
. -- ! a
Apir mu
1 N 67L a, 1 {lamls0:0¢ A rr
+ / !- } II-�3./.F/`C f .-el f J F�6-+�"� W. ria I2 i l
PUBLIC FACILITIES
DESCRIBE AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES, INCLUDING, ROADS,WATER, SEWER, PARKS,AND
PUBLIC TRANSIT:
iro I'f --(reds zrk dvl j TILL rL`' Ism _
1``t4/2J03 Page 5 of 5
Aerial Map
a.4— .I d° eke ' .#
34 oek �pc.9 — • i L. 1 *•' ges a ' .+rg ' , g ,r,'"'"
"/ u .
c� i �i� ..
•
411
9 ,a. r,� r I' I fat
Nt.
# 'Si'
Klb
ter l- — - 444 ' lit .,,f..- At, 411
•
At .
�� =..I 11g' ! Site —, - t
/./..-,,... , I. A f / -i
TL 01 A
_
1,*-,.,444,7•216,4-;"•- -....C.---. . ... or
. ���MMM JJJ
C t 1 1�• * x` F "t a' .� "f'•i fi" !,i F
'ti,, wl , �' { j�, 1 a. wl•1
1 •i �,° S1 +I ,..tyi. 'R 1M . f sal " 1
- 1;a0` 41k
'? h'i's'T ��iI_�. -'� ` It ' '
i
� ` 4. '�, ,a "�*! d� 46. Cli - i.;IT s"r r I.r
" ' Is
5yp m
•,"•' - ` i4 .tea ` 4 4.
r'llt
ifz
7.4PC4.-''''" - At " t
•
1q ^^��
q -r�.M: .• +I •e r a
4
7
s ~ .°�w � ' Y Mme.:., yam,
/b
. _ _ sundown
w....,....4.41r.,.,.
.
,), - ,-3, -,..,. ...„„,„... : .,)„.„ ic. : „ agn .M.
•
•
42nd,_,._. t 4_ • 4 ,
y'pr M
ti.1 ya{I� i� I1
N
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
_ fi F CPA-0'1.04 �� 1Iey
Il August,2004
Comprehensive Plan Map
im i__---,
, , ,
, 1 1
. ,
I
1
wo
k
\ .
, 1 „.._
...,
\ ,
\.
yti _____ _
„� NI
.._,,,. ..
I itd1111
1 '''' -..-- 41/19, ---------'4 - -- 1
1 ....,„ . z. 0•p
,. „,, , d r<0./4" b,,s, '.
illire", ON: ,._______ 1
j''''''''N'''-'----,..,,, ill /
I Of,, 1
--,, 401F., •-,
Comp Plan Category
I Lad Density Residesiial
' 1 Medium Density Residential i
Hi,Density Resklenlial
I —1 Mixed Use
Community Center
1. 1 Urban Activity Center X
1 Ne.gttbarhood Carnmercial
Ca mrnurity Cornrwci al INT—
l
1 .2illiritag
MI Regional Commercial
Light Industrial mg 1
Fleavy Industrial 411111 51' M
Mineral Land
,I _ II
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
CPA-al-04 sokane
Valley
ii August,2004
IZoning Map
I � r I
iii
bit
im. M.
11111.11111111
: :-::.. :.:::':-: 1_.;:.:,...,.:::. -L.! •SS °Mg°
d-
, :', ;: .- : NM ,L J.
ill" 51:
1
i ;pi Site
# 1 ---- [-- --. -
//AA„.
woe •
ii Ilkii 4seie, . 117a4 r,.
'. \--„,,,,,.,..t,„,..„,„_„,.„,
0 Zoning Category
UR-7
1 UR-12I 4/04,41,
E- •_ , ,
drier
URS
B-1
113'3 MI
E7,1RR10 \1/4. .
1-1
M -2
1-3
' •.- 1 '-Th--- 7--1--7-1-1--:F-1- E6'---1
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
f
CPA-01-04lleY
August 2004 V
CPA -02 -04
f . 6 I .P - 0a.- o
AV 45. di
FILE N . -� `
Sliolane City of Spokane Valley Application for
.0.017alley Comprehensive Plan Amendment
RECEIVED
PART I
iii z1MM
APPLICANT
IIAME: _ PHONE:(Drat`'/ 0L: r NT OF
k ADDRESS: Fp.0 .. .. to `3 f _ EMAIL: +�> i�3 -�v �ri.nN '
CITYdSTATEIZIP: E0,_14 t j(-4. , ` .$ )0 at. --_-
PROPERTY OWNER I (IF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT) —
---LI' AME= _scePHONE:
i_ DDRESS: - ---..01 _L.&A/ EMAIL:
CITY/STATE/ZIP: '! FAX:
PROPERTY OWNER 2 ( F MORE THAN TWO PROPERTY OWNERS,ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET)
ENAMEL PHONE: .J
ADDRESS: or J EMAIL:
CITY/STATE/ZIP: FA;7C:
AGENT/CONSULTANT/ATTORNEY
NAME: PH ONE:
ADDRESS: r EMAIL:
CITY/STATE/ZIP J FAX: I
LAND USE MAP CHANGE PROPOSAL:
- CURRENT DESIGNATION PROPOSED DESIGNATION
LAND USE MAP !-OWE=Dem v.41/ Ji eS,6.04St)14L 141:51., De pis v ? tVoid
ZONING MAP �,, _ -
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY CHANGE PROPOSAL (ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY)!
—1
CURRENT POLICYX.-- i
PROPOSED
POLICY
;r\c--- I
OFFICE USE ONLY: El City initiated itizen Initiated
Concurrency Ravi squired: El Yes
Date Received: Received By: p. 1.-+C'
11/4/2003 Page 1 of 6
PTI
LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE
AllifiliSignatur leg. o er or representative as authorized by legal owner)
I, , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT
THE A. IPVE RESPONSES A/' M DE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE REST OF MY
KNOWLE❑GE.
i FURTHER SWEAR OR. AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA
PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER,
ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF.
ADDRESS PO Box 7 0-1 ) PHONE:72g ,
if, ELA - , QIP: # 0 ' . id
City) (State) %1
fvas
(Signature
re (*:te)
NOTARY
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss_
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 2O
19 1
NOTARY SEAL
=oShiALt NOTARY SIGNATURE
{
(eV sti0r4 ,;` }i4 Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
1
0 140 4. p 'r Residing at: Va
p PtdE3L1 {
t!tr My appointment expires: ! ' f
11 o — x r'
111412002 Pace 2 of 5
•
PART ill
SITE DATA
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA OCRES OR SD. FT.) J, 2 ] --
ADJACENTARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED (ACRES CR SQ.FT.) CI
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: 'C E
SCHOOL DISTRICT: ` fsT
FIRE DISTRICT:
WATER DISTRICT: 3
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: AONE � _ m
OR PRIVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY: -
VWIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING PUBLIC/PRIVATE ROAD: '
ACCESS TO EXISTING OR PLANNED ARTERIAL? 'E
NAME OF ARTERIAL ROADS:
. Ala ' . O
PREVIOUS ZONINGILAND USE DFCI'SION .
L1ST PREVIOUS k LANNiNG ACTIONS 1NVO..VING THIS PROPERTY: •
--
•
CHANGED CONDITIONS
IWHAT ARE THE CHANGES CONDITIONS WHICH WARRANTS THIS PROPOSED CHANGE?
14p1 coy c,FJ is t eqv ,Altar?f/ 14,45 f 5!C.14.7 of Rorvely
1114/2D03 Page 3 of 5
PROPOSAL
PROVIDE GENERAL DESCRIPT1oN OF PROPOSAL; _-_—
74; #AvE Nij EJ-, isw 11-1‘9
ADJACENT LAND USES_
1 DESCRIBE EXISTING,LAND USES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF PROPOSAL:
Apt TAid s?TH, A ,CTrc k/S F 7` , ciLiCC
LiiLPMC-5 To tvt5t, s r1,0-L1; Fri-r-irLy ,QoSrDew L r E-P- •
11/4/2003 Page 4 cf 5
F l F
-
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY _
DESCRIBE How PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-CITE SPECIFIC GOALS/POLICIES'
72 Nam-) AphgtPle 7-5 Wits
L IJO JAJr RipAN fmrniT5 Aintil OP FR6F
6.Jt=S 7- 'VD filo 1# T51J00*/4- PILI P# c t-, 141-50 rcE
561 LC dip)0-- 17TiD, A iqo joy' kr ,JI 1�a1 t[r
1
Pu BUG FACILITIES ----
DESCRIBE AVA1ASILITY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES, INCLUDING, ROADS, WATER, SEWER, PARKS,AND
PUBLIC TRANSIT:
et a ''MS ,1365-P sru£3 etn" .4 Tido z.40
Is ' iskis is )- L Gt) tJLL` o
c Ctiv u 0 PLIty Y\z O r l+„J5S r Ls ' TM Al)
&c k. A'OM J o P eT
11/41,'2003 Page 5 of 5
r Aerial Map
• ' . -I.. . ..4 i ' ' ...la' ` "--- --:' Vt.' -,..-
ft-J i:•OT`..„ .,':.
1 . , • . .. - •O''a .Nit 1 % ;-to ..A7., .,,'-L., . ..._
,.m, , •-ii -_ .,,,,•
k .. :_-_,,.;--f4_r." - 6M.•. 1. ,t IT d lir
•
'? •
• ... r'rr . .r% t'. .
. ..
Dom, 5 -• L
• --r-i. .
L ,,.*I'a ' 0, . l•
,
rir --1 , -.
.41)11,"..--%cc,t ,_ ..r. Ibit.,. _il,t' To-r4' . .y 75 _ tai'.• ' •v: r. ' Ir i:;'''.
_
0 W — 1 .'-' •I a ... 1 ,..... 7.--
*"1 °""-7" "'-• "'IL 1 n
v., -
I ..,
Fen I., .140 It ' Leatal ' -!!
, t
-I ., .
_ . . , 7 •77 .
..—•
LI ''' 0. . ".--'7' „'- .,' -1 .... .
I „...,. . ,
1
S e ,,, ,sa. - , - ' ' ..,,-._ '. ., n,...--1 ,_ -7-
,
ii. '14
• I -
_ .4 7-Ii • I 0 .
, .
•,--
,
...
• , ,,, .z , . ..
- -ilkir•-•.---.„...—.4 .1.— • -,
_ • .
.. .
•
, . •-,. ....., .... .,.
..., r
_
,--- 'V.,". .°71., ..• - -
-
. - v•
. ••.. .. .
'"Vii00011 "'
_. - :. • Ertdd
.- s•-•-:.•,_ -5, wili10
i -
• 'I . ---,.4! Pl. -;
_ _ -. 'l'A I. ,,, '" '' ''' -,...t-lk„ •-•• -. . '.. . '-i-. ' ---.,7:.
. _.
•
••6 s"ii
• H --, -7 ••6. '-- .t'1;-..-.111 t . 1
1 11 - t. .: lit
- ,__._ :.1,.1• , ' E- - , ll . t ...- 1--...!`.1;- . • „,-,0" -. lir ' .
, • b-,,A.
.
-..- I - .
". - -.1
P
".t. . . .,
.... — --m
L v. I'
1 I ''
: • t'CI 1.;
N. r:' '2'li'i '-'!N`r'
___ --- . 1•‘---74-:-!*7...'• -.- — - ' . - .
' -1•1 '— ,:- . . . .-.
, -,.... • .--4• r".. ---i_. 4
, ..
• i „Iii. . .
_ .....
..... ..„ . ..
....„ . ,...„.. 4- ..-- _
1 47. _. ,. .Ili•1
. , ,.1
.. °D-
,
. • ':olliV " . --
..,1 T ikke i 0 I _.. I ._
..
.._
_... -. • enlit Vig ' Ate;
- ..-
, .:..u., 7....6' ., '';'''• - 11;.:
—
.As
,
I
I . .
I -,
---, I _--
• „, _. '--ke •
•.'" -7 -.
- 7 ,._ .-4?-•
_.,
_ .
N
, + Comprehensive Plan Amendment
CPA-02-04 SJalle...."\...._
.000Vallev
, August, 2004
•
Comprehensive Plan Map
_ , 1
_
L-1--- r kft
b y�
f
,-/ Oesmet
__:_____1.–___H___ I
I 1
Site
01111112.
,
ti instResidential7NE
_________________:
MI
-/,14 ohm i r
plimum _ ___,, a . 1
Low Den ity Rosid rttia1
Comp Plan Category
Low DensIty Residential I ^ — y
!_ 7 Medium Cernity Residential
High Density Resldential jISM
Mixed Us® I iI v
Community Center
Urban ActivilyCentier ^il NM
JNeighborhood Commercial
I , Community Commercial
- Regional Commercial
Light Industrial i IN° ---_
Heavy Industrial `—H k__?MOM I
Mrlei2l Land 1
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
CPA-02-04 'tin
+ dossi*Val ley
g
Auust,20Q4
IZoning Map
'L\\..\\\:\ k\\. \\.1—_ L___,___--r 1 1 ii---'„,L i ' ,_.: '
41/4Nstv
psmel i l
, ..„, al 1, 1
1
11111111 1--- 1
fill' 111111111111111111 111Fr
S1 I '
/41. ,
pee 40,iii 1111111/0 ill Mil t.
e
reot/41E 1..41
VJJ4. ..
J4/AH . .
..;._,.......-1 mi il
_ r
11111111110114 117
IN.V.:':'-2.'::.-1.;'.:11
„a-�i zoning category L .-,:::_:-.,. 1111 .iii ......--v r1 .1 UR-3.5 _uIIi. " :I
1 UR-12 - 1
IZ' UR-22 ''''''..' ., MUM 1111
.
,':, 1,2,6] XN\%\k,N, 1111 111111111.1 III MI
M II': X\NI .: .1:,. : r L
-7 I i i . '
. 1
i , , 1 ,
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
• + GPA-02414 p+ ne"'"
August, 2004
t
CPA -03 -04
6P Pt —04
Ql: QWeeme or
' .
Land Use Consulting Services
9101 N. Mt View Lane
Spokane,WA 99218
509-467-0l (0) 509-435-3105 (C) 509-467-0229 (F)
6-23--04
Spokane Valley Planning Department
11707 E. Sprague Avenue Suite 106
Spokane, 'alley, WA 99206
Attn: Scott Kuhta Long Range Planner
Ref: Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment and Zone Change
Dear Scott:
Enclosed are the completed forms you provided for a comprehensive plan amendment
and zone change. I am filing this application on behalf cfmy client Pring Corporation,
who owns property just west of Sullivan Rd. on Springfield Avenue one block north of
Valley Way. The site is currently designated Medium Density Residential but only zoned
UR-7. It adjoins their retail development within a Regional Commercial category along
Sullivan and would be an ideal location for a medical office facility. As you know, this
requires a UR-22 zone, therefore we are filing this request tc amend the map from MDR
to I-1DR to provide UR-22 zoning for medical office use.
X think you will find that the location and surrounding land uses lend the site to medical.
use better than apartments. Unfortunately, we still live with the mixed beg of zoning
inherited from the County regulations. Ultimately, if this approved, we would prefer
straight"office"zoning if and when such is available.
Please keep me informed of your progress toward a public hearing with the Planning
Commission.
est Rc,, ds
g t J.0 urn
Land Use consulting Services
Enclosure: Cornp Plan Application, SEPA Checklist and Fees
Copy: Pring Corporation CIO John Peterson
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
PlanningCommission - Public Hearing
September 23, 2004
Name (Please Print): LAAJ , !4_` k-
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Address: /2 a - 1 ''
Planning Commission Public Hearing .:1.
September 23, 2004 Agenda Item: i ,�.
ITI4er Proposal
lame (Please Print): 7 Opposed to Proposal
ddress: 0 Neutral
agenda Item:
Wish to Speak: ❑`.Yes ❑ No
b For Proposal
E Opposed to Proposal
Neutral CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission - Public Hearing
Wish to Speak: ❑ Yes 0 No September 23, 2004
Name (Please Print): 6.--Kik-t541
Address: /
Agenda Item: 1 O _ co'-11
F' For Proposal
Opposed to Proposal
Neutral
FILE No.CPA--o -01
1-1{I• IT1011/1\111Art,
pokane r City of Spokane Valley Application for
4001/Talley Comprehensive Plan Amendment
PART
APPLICANT
Name: Pring Corporation CAD John PetersonFoNE: 924-6423
Address: 8412 E. p_prs Avenue EmAiL:
City/State/Zip: Spokane, WA 99212 FAx:
PROPERTY OWNER .1 (IF DIFFERENT FRom APPLICANT)
NAME: Same PHONE
ADDRESS: EMAL:
CITY/STATE/ZIP: FAX:
PROPERTY OWNER 2 OF mORE THAN TWO PROPERTY OWNERS,ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET!
NAME: NAPHONE
ADDRESS: EMAIL:
____________ • __•• •• • •• • _ _
I CITY/STATE/ZIP: FAX:
AGENT/CONSULTANT/ATTORNEY
i Name: Dwight 1 i-jumeP!.-.19.nq: 435-3108
I
Address: O1 Mt. View L'ane 'citiume@spoicane-
. landuse.com
CitylStatetZip Spokane, WA 99218 Fax: 457-0229
LAND USE MAP CHANGE PROPOSAL:
CURRENT DESIGNATION 7 PROPOSED DESIGNATION
LAND USE MAP • MDR KDR
1
ZONING MAP UR-7 • UR-22
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY CHANGE PROPOSAL (ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET IF NEcEssARyr.
CURRENT POLICY Not App[icable
PROPOSED Not Applicable
POLICY
6423;004 Page of 5
�,I OFFICE USE ONLY: C City Initiated itiizen Initiated
i Concurrency Review Required: 0 Yes c
Date Received: tc, --21,1 -15" Received By:
PART II
LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE
(Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
I, Kirk M. Owsley , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT
THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE. _
Pry. - Carporation, a Washington corporation is
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT .V'"1 -THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA
PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER,
ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZiNO MY
ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF.
ADDRESS: 8412 E. Sprague Ave. PHONE (54g) 921-8880
Spokane, WA ZIP: 99121
F it (State)
ON-
By 172r 1. June 24, 2004
,Kirk I. Owsley (Sign- -) - r (Date)
treasurer
NOTARY
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) 5S:
COUNTY OF SPOINE }
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 24th day of June 20 04
NOT EAL 41.
1 Oro,
re pOTARY SIGN•,TURF
Or{
R , ' Notary Public in ar.d for the Stale of Washington
3 ce Pante .6E31Residing at: Spokane
4. • ,a
Pa.� v v0 My appointment expires: July 7. 2045
IMMAtk
6123/20C4 Page 2 of 5
FART III
SITE DATA
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA(ACRES OR SO. FT.) 1 2..23 acres.(97,139
ADJACENT ARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED (ACRES CR SR,FT.) .B7 acres —_—_
EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: vacant
SCHOOL DISTRICT' CVS #35 }
FIRE DISTRICT: I FD#1
WATER DISTRICT: _ __. .
Vera Water and Power
NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: Unknown
PUDUO OR PPJVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY: Sprin_gfeld Avenue
lyvioTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING PUBLIC/PRIVATE ROAD a_ yroximately 215 f,, ___--
ACCESS TOEXISTING OR PLANNED ARTERIAL? MN) No
NAME OF ARTERIAL ROADS: _�_ __ - -Sullivan 1Rd. T—�
70,rCL( old , f aq 5-
PREVIOUS
-.__�
PREVIOUS ZONINGILAND USE DECISION
L1ST PREVIOUS PLANNING ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
The City has not acted upon this p;ocerty throuch previous actions,
CHANGED CONDITIONS
WHAT ARE THE CHANGES CONDITIONS WHICH WARRANTS TI-115 PROPOSED CHANGE?
The conversion to commercial along the adjacent easterly boundary at Sullivan Rd.
The conversion to 1JR-22 office uses and zoning adjacent to the south along Valley Way.
The installation of full services to the subject property.
The requirement for GMA Planning,
The combination of high density residential end medical office uses within the UR-22 zone and the lack of
specific office land use designations and zones.
6123f2C04 Page 3 of 5
PROPOSAL
PROVIDE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL
PROPOSED LAND USE CHANGE FROM MDR TO HDR TO PROVIDE THE ABILITY TO HAVE MEDICAL OFFICE USAGE,
WHEREAS THE UR-12 ZONE OF THE MDR CATEGORY DOES NOT ALLOW MEDICAL OFFICE USES.
ADJACENT LAND USES
DESDRI13E EXISTING LAND USES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF PROPOSAL:
NORTH:5 SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS EXIST ALONG.SPRINGFIELD; •
WEST: VERA WATER AND POWER HAS A PUMP HOUSE FACILITY AND A CITY PARK IS ADJACENT THAT.
EAST: RETAIL AND OFFICE USES
SOUTH:VACANT AND OFFICE USES;DUPLEX UNITS TO TFIE SW,
6/2 /2004 Page 4 of 5
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY
DESCRIBE How PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENTWITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-CITE.SPECIFIC GOALS/POLICIES:
THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IS VOID C ANY"OFFICE" USE POLICIESINC THE USE IS ALLOWED WITHIN
THE I"IOR CATEGORY, IT IS BEST TO ADDRESS THE USE BY THAT CATEGORY.
PERHAPS THE MOST APLLICABLE GOAL FROM THE EXISTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT IS U L2.16 WHICH STATES
THAT WE SHOULD ENCDURGAGE THE LOCATION OF MEDIUM AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL CATEGORIES NEAR
COMMERCIAL AREAS AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACES AND ON SITES WITH GOOD ACCESS TO MAJOR ARTERIALS.
COMMENT
THIS GOAL DESCIBES THE SUBJECT SITE COMPLETELY. IT 15 NEAR PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND ADJACENT
COMMERCIAL AREAS AND CAN HAVE GOOD ACCESS TO SULLIVAN RD.A MAJOR ARTERIAL,VIA SPRINGFIELD
AVENUE ONCE IMPROVED WITH PAVING, CURBING AND SIDEWALKS TO MATCH EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS AT
SULLIVAN, SINCE THE UR-22 ZONE SERVES BOTH HOUSING AND MEDICAL OFFICE IT IS PRESUMED THAT THIS
GOAL AND POLICY APPLIES.
PUBLIC FACILITIES
DESCRIBE AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES, INCLUDING, ROADS,WATER,SEWER, PARKS,AND
PUBLIC TRANSIT:
ALL SERVICES ARE AVAIALABLE TO THE SITE, HOWEVER SPRINGFIELD IS GRAVEL AND NEEDS TO BE PAVED,
CURBED AND SIDEWALKED PER ADJACENT IMPROVEMENTS ADJACENT OUT TO SULLIVAN.
6;23r2004 Page 5 o=5
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1 -45144.0221
THE SOUTH HALF of TRACT 4.9. OF VERA, IN VOLUME "O'CF PLATS. PAGE 30'
EXCEPT THE WEST 200 FEET THEREOF;
AND EXCEPT THE EAST 231 FEET THEREOF;
AN❑ ALSO EXCEPT SPRINGFIELD ROAD DEEDED TO SPOKANE COUNTY RECORDED ON
NOVEMBER 19, 1970 UNDER RECORDING NO. 52082SC;
AND ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE EAST HALF THEREOF;
TOGETHER WITH THE WEST Th FEET OF THE SOUTH 130 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF SAID
TRACT 49;
SITUATE IN THE CJTY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON.
_...____
7 Aerial Map
`_ 1, Jr..
r 416u
'. .44:.__.
iii-r.fe
1
- �r1 F4t�-'1,Y,''-G�4 .7 ,71010 'F t e F i - Z -
,fel �P ' _ a q q IP +F_ ..
9II AP'
_r 4}y3
-yyi a - • _� - q i
1111
Mallon ' ') ■ q__ t # ¢ '
-, ,- , 1 yrsV
I y w = F
P - . @
J\ , 'es, • ,..
2.
—._..__.. -1 '1 -� :@.,-;•.3.,F �f• • I -I ' !a
... .. - i+ 1 clew . Site -� 1` "�' i 391
is'
---- ..A .,- —
r - iti .a'
IV
3'1 ,. ,-
ter C
•7.1 A .1 .- -' Ili 1. @ q
Per-e. ; - ,} 7 . 1._
' ',"lilk 1 - Z.
'k114n af.j-1 1.
414,A- ! . WO
4 IPAlir ill.A/
7,1
.i . { �
r
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
LIl [t �L
PA-03-04 ' 'el 4'
1 August, 20D4
Comprehensive Plan Map
iiii.." up —_
nil. IIIIIL 411%
.1111 " altar 11.4111Poil 4140.,I
___; mail 111400. ill,7 il. WAWA 111
] lairo ixoll
ad hamis
1 H
L
UIits �
_ .. ;- . � M
,___._,,,,„
., I ,
0
I
,,,
- 1, 1 iiiilli
A.
- Camp Flan Category M
Low Density Residential IIII 0
- I Medium.Density Residential
1P Huh Density Residential di 1
, I .Mixed Use1
Corn reunity Center
1r Urban Activity Center
Neighborhood Commercial
_ TT CcmmurrltyCormmer+cial
_ Ili Regional Commercial
Light!Mashie!
Heavy ladustria11
l
Mineral Land r
f1
r Comprehensive Plan Amendment
CPA-03-04 ��.
August,2004 alley
Zoning Map
1 .:i i-:::1,11.,, atitio-wWNAMil I I
_... ...i, : itiatiali is
. - ::-. .' Efirifif7" 11
.i:,:' -.--... iiiKer .:. ., Imi -%i
' '' ''''' '.:. - WO/
III 1 i+
1 nlirksigit4114.1111001111-rr
� f
Iiiiii IhillIMIN4 PP
Ear. i 1 1
Site 1111110.40 ----1
M
"fir Fla I______.71ARY",.:;,` f,::':'''''! ', V or#1IH.:,::*::,,:,.tekroM
finning Category .`. 1
: (JR-3.5_ =LIR-r " room riciip1
=UR-7 1111 le ,
.; ti
_ un.,2
1 Pr nim a A A .04,....4„ r _-=
IE:--s2 I 1.11
4p'70JI
--- 7V
I E' : I I F vere77, 7/7//ild
''• 7 _ ---1-1 .1, / er / 1:e A
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
CPA-03-04P
--- + August,2004 � lle
CPA -04 -04
i, q
, ' ) ,
1
FILE Na.�j �'�
.. . , _
Spat* .., � � lIiCatIOn fOr
riii,Volity , _._City of Spokane Valley pp
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
PART I
APPLICANT -
NAME: -J H H. [r'/ r'e -- r PHONE: 3'67 7- .3v�� f.
ADDRESS: E 77 P Ie i /fv .4 EMAILPGlfl_ sp- e24.vPL, Ce-72
CLTY/STATEIF41e,„ LeJ# 11 F .x:
PROPERTY OWNER 1 (IF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT)
NAME: E the_e -a-F Pa o f H. 6rr -axe PHONE:
ADDR� ,s' -- _ EMAIL: --
CITY/STATE/ZIP: FAX: ,
PROPERTY OWNER 2 (IF MORE THAN TWO PROPERTY OWNERS,ATT,4C4I SEPARATE SHEET
[ NAME: --- — PHONE:
ADDRESS: EMAIL: —
CITY!STATE/2 l P FAX:
AGENTICONSULTANTIATTOFNEY
-
NAME: _ PHONE:
A[} : EMAIL:
CITY/STATE/ZIP .�.. FAX:
LAND USE MAP CHANGE PROPOSAL:
F CURRENT DESIGNATION L PROPOSED DESIGNATION
LAND USE MAP L0,-) D.en5,r 'x €AZ- I Ii;,' , De..7.5.-v'tg Reser Wedr4iii
ZONING MAP Uir 3..5 a u&2
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY CHANGE PROPOSAL(ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY):
r
CURT ENT POLICY
r
PROPo5EI /4
POLICY
OFFICE USE NLY: EECity initiated11 itizerl initiated
Ct n�currency Review Required: Yes
Ai
Da#e Received: " ` _ Received By: A_�_. ,� *. r ___i
1114/2003 Page I of 5
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Planning Commission - Public Hearing
September 23, 2004
Name (Please Print): [1'
Address; C !}
Agenda Rem: C —
For Proposal
E Opposed to Proposal
H Neutral
Wish to Speak: Er Yes 0 No
} II
PART II
LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE
(Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
F AF/e j-• , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT
THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY
KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THENE ONF RECOROT RD F THE AREA
TOWNER,
PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE
ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF.
ADDRESS: f C2 e.gr,
PHONE: Y- i' .?._3
'. 6 , - ZIP: .0 -
(City) (State)
} .- _
(Signature (Date)
NOTARY
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE . )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me t s day ofri 20 '
1ss A. .,�, 'l'i,
siortY
r
° t CT4l y m. iLL_ NOTARY SIG 1TURE
e;u PUBLIC f5 Notary Public in and for the State , ashington
f• i:\_- -.9 P01'01...-e_r: Residing at: Lp k
My appointment expire: I , -( ),07
Page 2 of 5
11 f4�2�43
,
- i
.a.
UPERICI LIFT OF WASHINGTON
,, ,_ COUNTY OF SPOKANE
OCT 2 9 1999
E TATE,[3F THOMAS Fi,FALLQLJ:T
z3POKANE COUNTY CLER c
PAUL H. GILLESPIE,
CASE NO. 994-01305-2
DECEASED
LETTERS TESTAMENTARY
I. BASIS
1.1 The last will of the decedent(s), late of Spokane County, Washington was exhibited, proven
and recorded in this court on: OCTOBER 29, 1999.
2.2 In that will: PAUL H. GILLESPIE, JR.
is named personal representative.
1.3 The personal representative has qualified.
11. AUTHORIZATION
THIS CERTIFIES. PAUL H. GILLESPIE, JR.
is authorized by this court to execute the will of the above decedent according to law.
THOMAS R. FALLQUIST
SPOKANE COUNTY CLERK
Dated: OCTOBER 29, 1999
By Vivian Nachtwey,
{Seal} Deputy Clerk
Ill. CERTIFICATE OF COPY
State of Washington )
County of Spokane )
As clerk of the superior court of this county, I certify that the above is a true and correct copy of
the Letters Testamentary in the above-named case which was ford/rand centered_of record on: 1012911999.
I further certifythat these letters are now in full fore nd effect. /
THO 4 R. FALLQUIST
SPO -N,ICO IJ NTY CL',
Dated: OCTOBER 29, 1999
ByA. .--0-- r_
{Seal} r- Deput ' e
LITTERS TESTAMENTARY RCW 11,28.D1O.090 Probate].
PART III
SITE DATA
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA(ACRES OR SQ.FT.) -s
ADJACENT ARE CWNEC OFR CONIROLLCD(ACRES OR SOFT) o ow+z
EXISTING USE rF PROPERTY:
SCHOOL DISTRICT: 6;9 I e
FIRE DISTRICT:
- - ...
WATER DISTRICT; /gee trr foto) r
_
NEIGHUORH000 ASSOCIATION: Irl A
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY: La
WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING FUBL!CIPRIVATE RCIAC- 1 --1: 7-71 3 4 e e
ACCESS TO EXISTING OR PLANNED ARTERIAL?(YIN)
NAME OF=ARTERIAL ROADS: 'p _ri, A✓sitar
CtJ4 d L, 3 I , 60
PREVIOUS ZONING/LAND USE DECISION
LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY:
ft°o Te.
CHANGED CONDITIONS
WHAT ARE THE CHANGES CONDITIONS WHICH WARRANTS THIS PROPOSED CHANGE?
,Cry 't ,/ 4 1r OCCUyrr 'Lr l f
We .yY407ti 1a�°J l'�'?y [J� 1
Je La JO p fi cix.rkg i `s c..+,L*r c r- °mei t.4/4/7"
rf a ,-�..� - Ire, .
,j'_ � s La) d8. � r c 117 Zvi/ ,
ZA-
,/ J fret
4 c ire" •0, ° e v e &
6-6 -) ±jam
11/4/2003 Page 3 of 5
PROPOSAL
PROVIDE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL;
e z c es- 1".a ,447 Ple
/ 1, We,vis t" 'r /8 C-! //e,-;..7
/j ?Z-
o e'C/ !{c )f—c: e-c /t / sem •
ADJACENT LAND USES
DESCRIBE EXISTING LAND USES WIThIN THE VICINITY OF PROPOSAL:
rceit71/ s1 j//. f.?" 4, 4
p,-./5/-e-A. i ,r e rer rrL77 6eerr /, c e c/ y
74-14-4. r- .Z.e "7 cx e4
y
/79 16' a reef sv�v
5 e O s f s " Avt - a_re
jr11/4/2003 Page 4 of 5
t
COMPREHENSIVE PLANt CONSISTENCY .b —_.z
ESCRIBE How PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN—CITE SPECIFIC GOALS/POLICIES`
/ r Cd.�r� � ' 7l'+ Cry [ j7 47-C . '7, 4 -
f ,r e 1 .e/ &e f'r Tied, e d.ni arc r of 8,-_J-' �. r .5-.16-,ct44 ,r vcc e s c� ry1a�J, r aPr Irl /r -The .p."--ver- 7 /3' }ac?Zea
r7:7
raAt 12),-0/roar Ail hV,
,570 Via//e i/.
L .. / 7 #71-, the si homes
re Sa 71-/r,y'LLIr f
b'r LT/n.)4'; r c a ' rtee ' ,-,--e t.s- X s '�
Zf
i"e.1"' e Lr / • peon . 1r "."7/2.27,.re Q f Li"al, ' •""9441. 6.
p0T' z_Aglt� ry ltJst a lir it "'icy
r'," 1pp671,5-/ a-"7,� C' rr s . d; 0 F 7`77
//T 2 J7L tY i f C' J fG4o 1�j t. 7 e Sc r7Y ev707 ., s be
1
eg'Srr -
PUBLIC FACILITESDESCRIBE AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES, INCLUDING, ROADS,WAT=R, SEWER, PARKS,AND
PUBLIC TRANSIT'
rr 'Zer% { . rr ,; dcr r -
7eoFn , re rc r �r 8 fS - --Y-z c
e Ji-Z e/',? /c2/ ): ,,./ is /, C7 p ,r IC24Cl.
, " cher t S Sc t u rc ° e 1/4,1/-e + i J,ar
6E. 1;17 4-x-Izerke
e Y+ d + s r'c r c`i-Co vr,
pie fr-eA
•
•
11/4/2003 Page 5 Cif 5
1
Aerial Map
,`air^ Y af`N �,* - 4'[
•
Stn .- • •-!
T I 116
- • H
C
• pli; ._..
Fes°•
1 I &
n e •
- - Y ! atafd1? 1
_ ... _ �� 's _ •
Site '* 4 f I..
I
r "Lr •
peoaslwai t _
rt
'
a!• g.'• '
Ir 1, .-. g• ... "
' ! '
• II
' .F
!in l
•
.-.
••,_
• • • J s I' l.
5 1 1 ,
'.. i.,- _ 1 �' .� I f. I
• 4- • f .
j ,fie rT .r a+1 °' - f•.1
' q +�Ia C ."•1T tF-_ = ar,4.." . .. i t -
it
•
r.....,•&4a `"•-L - --�.. „ ,_� 1 'Zai - t z rix r r ari,+5.+r`«i:•°�`� r .n
,t;4Igo
a*, r -31r r. I
• MO ti '' :r ' -L--.- -- y P
I-�.. :,q dei° •'7W.t, ._ -•. — .3'•1 -� r' . L 4 `
.i
L r-
1 i{ M1�F 1---•,11,- nr l 1
I i` ko. •
. . ro_ ^
1 i �y - @`` _
. i.e...5;_,,li.,-.. '-'"-:D . . I,*-
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
' CPA-04-04
- ++ -- August,2004 Mdley
_
I Comprehensive Plan Map
, _ / ,
L_d --1 raiii..111.1
.11....__ _000.-N igiopip- thl imi si
.....
1 woilir.
Wallillilk ' 1i •'.. 'weir'
I
i111 ;'rL
l90 I00
Site ,,di.. IP imiv hi la hall
III 111111
1111:AIIIIIMILZIIP Zli ro -6 —gm
- ma != d.e., iii-- .0
ill la fie ann.! nos Pa, 1
,T. in s l
:ami ■um
Comp Plan Category ilul '
1 Low Density Residential Millla MINe Wid IMMINI 111111
I MIN HighDeni�tyRdenlil II:i1,iti
• 1- �
j Community Center MOM I ■
NM Urban Activity Center 1..„
EEEEE'
11!
IllMI 1 rot
MMIMI _ IIIp,��u®MIIIIIIPPI
Light Industtri 7
11 Heavy Industrial � �r�
go
Mineral Land I1 ,,,_--0104
y`-40
, ,
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
CPA-04-04 I(F IF
� eels
ey
August,2004 +�
I Zoning Map
\ 1 -
PO UN
‘.?4.\\‘‘,\\\\\I%<x.,tk,\\ss..\s\W NI, ., 1----3 WWI L
t1/4',. .„ , ,:,%.,kw ii.N.N, ,:.,-,Ns ‘'N‘x\k‘r1iki i
liki\sliksssiikvs**. z\w‘
4,0„,N., %..%1444„ „NI. ..4,010.41/4\x‘vis1/4,:t.i1/4 .N.,1/4,,,...wik ji.,
itk,\4•4:6141m,‘,---\\\
NIC
-4,:r-Xs,* I L ......... A\1/41,44.SMINN a
ii ill
"., ,, ktik,„-b\N‘
l * i -
+
1/4 N-40:\. 1. ciwo
-\\- N,
I lislif _. __ _ ___
II,
ill
ii'suIIItir"\TP'
Categorytig At nil p III 1111 III m
ii ..,001ii rag umw
Ifismilm m _. c al id 1 Lita. In
Zoning 11111IIRI1IIIIIF '1U I ; UR-3.5 in
1 uR 2 `i.UR r wand 'rteis
.
vim uR-22 n prill____I ME rep r, RCM di Fee,
1' '1 B-3 II IMMO "lit4 i 11
II 11
Ei i 11111
l .rrayue
p
010. gi
=[wiz 111Y001 1\ \71'• :I - 04i
N Comprehensive Plan Amendment
CPA--04-0 b .
? August,2004 \ ll