Loading...
Agenda 08/28/2003 Pt 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY • Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: x A _ - i y Address: ' f f r Agenda Item'_ For Proposal / 51,2: `` Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak- fes No PPP/A!CP6 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: i ZW *A Address: _Z/ Agenda Item: c rA T - _ar Proposal 1 Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak- es No Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map ` ''� h l'� IIS 'l �' ...� L�.__..,� n. , , ,, __, , , r__ _ ____ „_. 111 i , ._ , ___ .11 --1- , III - r, I 15 } f I 1 • I l + ti + M + L ) ____L- --i , 1 _ o ,,ii Site _ .. Mui r TEM . Rill11111 yyentgonY 111.1111111.11111111.111 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI"Mmlim"..m...ImimmllPPIIIIIIII, a Comp Plan Category . Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential - i IIIIII High Density Residential ; - Neighborhood Commercial ' 4000000. . ommunity Commercial MB Regional Commercial I Mixed Use r== • . pi . = Community Center S .T 1 Urban Activity Center Light Industrial r - _ }heavy Indu friar 1 . — I __ I Mineral Land L____ August 15, 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ane 420 CPA-03-03 i 030 Vaal ey Feet Zoning Map \, \, I /1 i - ,, i . . , , . . . •. .• I. i \ . (,/,/;\ E.....J — -I _- - s, .-.., y ._ _ ti I. � — , . _. .Usite • ri ' ;,.,:. ,.•-..... ..-.:..[]: 03 ,i,' 1, Indiana aim MQntJo me rY 1 90 "14111111 4,..,.,., , ...fop. III 9t} l90 B w 06 64 C I ass lki116- cin !IZonii UFS-3.� _ / UR-7 f UR-12 imi Ufa-22L J 14-1 I m. jiiI3E11piiim wig IE. 1-3 111111 August 15,2003Comprehensive Plan Amendment yz=" 410CPA-03-03 i117klne Feet � atller • CP+1-'°3-° 3 p Of\elaisi FILE NO glian e City of Spokane Valley Application for 40,1/alley Comprehensive Plan Amendment PART I APPLICANT NAME: . / ha..I. ..4: . 5? ...5..Liz 4 Pi-icrE: 2:a. ,,,. _ 4-rr 33- , ADDRESS: 3 7,, c4 5 .r.-5 0-Pe...., ,r__ EMAIL: 7-s-Lim.,, A r 416 4,1 d CITY/STATE/ZIP: V, ,,-_,Id Ag.t __()_.,,r1 c7f 6_z-2_ LFAX: jr9,F q.,-r-t--- PROPERTY OWNER 'I OF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT) , -------- _S-'__S0-10NE: (,fic--;L. , „,,) ADDRESS; 3-Tf ci. g 2:.. EivIAIL: CI-re/STATE/ZIP: cle. i.-.1..5 ci ,— r9 u.,_a q91,E1.7 FAX: PROPERTY OWNER 2 OF IMRE THAN TWO PROPERTY OWNERS,ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET) NAME: --E-g. PHONE: 4=777-4 -7f 4 ADDREIS: 1./ i --7....—D6--4,f;,t (..s EMAIt: gO i ot...0,P,er. .... (P01,,..C1--- T— Crn7/STATE/ZIP: Liz .--...m Jtr. A/ 1 ] AGENT/CONSULTANT/ATTORNEY I-NAME: 1 PFIDNE: ADDRESS: _ i EMAIL: CITY/§TATE/ZIP----- j FAX: _ ---I LAND LAND USE MAP CHANGE PROPOSAL: CURRENT DESIGNATION T PROPOSED DESIGNATION LAND USE MAP 1 ,g_E4_0,,5/ _t,,,cpiro..•A A r I 4f ,P416 -1-r at-i stC-i A..-I ZONING MAP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY CHANGE PROPOSAL(ATTACH SEPARATE SKEET IF NECESSARY): CURRENT POLICY ,,,,, ,, R EC EIVFn City ofj:ip:::nge°3V- "P-ey - pRoposED lutill POLICY 1 1 OFFICE USE ONLY: CI City initiatedr/r-Mtizen Initiated Concurrency Review Required: 0 Yes . i: No Date Received: 4 - 5E1-'53 Received By: _ 6/30f2003 Page 1 of 5 ti ,, `. FILE NO, Sókaiie City of Spokane Valley Application for 0Valley Comprehensive Plan Amendment PART I APPLICANT . . NAME: _ .Pe 4,„� -. . r6_r-ri a. : PHONE: q L fl' 6 AI DRESS: 'r .ns... . cA 5 . - EMAIL: 13, s -4.-..c @. Q..IV.,z--7. iu e ti ' CITY/STATE/ZIP: U .c-ra-d, I. A-. c.'et d s7 FAX: l*,.-(. -73.a 5-- PROPERTY —PROPERTY OWNER'I {IF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT) _ _ NAME _...„1 I twos. . S. _._. Kee..c_;-R-1-_..• .. ... . ' t-_.PHONE:... q..z-!-1...1- Y. g.. . I ., .i j ADDRF_5S: 7! 9 ' i_NIA- 1iL:. .. ef.'. ..„7'5..4.x, ® . i.u.E0 Pa . $A CITY/STATE/ IP: ./p.*1e Cci 7-90 3.7 ' FAX: r- -- -4— - R93 V40A^ "— ROPERTY OWNER 21!F MORE THAN TWO PROPERTY OWNERS,ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET). •ME: PHONE: J'�DDRESS: -• - - -- _ _ .,..�. . _.,T... ' ,.EMAIL;..... , . •..• .• ._.. .. . . .... i /-. _.. i CITYTATE/ZIP: _ - _FAx: AG ENTJCONs ULTANTJATTGRN EY NAME: ° PHONE: ADDRESS: i EMAIL: C TY/STATE/ZIP j FAX: LAND USE MAP CHANGE PROPOSAL: " ' CURRENT DESIGNATION' PROPOSED DESIGNATION LAND USE MAAP ..1-87:,01-%. r.CI: ..0,41 gA.5�: . I .g_si. e ;.174:k.......1 ±,-. � .,,:g,' 4.'L ZONING MAP r i. . . .. . ' .. _ - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY CHANGE PROPOSAL An—Am SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY): CURRENT POLICY Aii fit— - •, PROPOSED i PoLIOY i 4/1 iit i OFFICE USE ONLY: n City Initiated ❑ Citizen Initiated Concurrency Review Required: ❑ Yes ❑ No i� Date Received: Received By: - 6/4/2003 Page 1 of 5 PART H LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner) , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: 1"14' PHONE: j fk tq. i:va ZIP: 9 9 d 7 (City) (State) (Signature) (Date) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this `' W- Jwi day of , 200 NOTARY SEAL PF 3 e 4P, N* = SIGNATURE I= 4114084., 41A% 1 Notary Public in and for the Slate of Washington Atato a Residing at SPO> g V Ar-LA ▪ T• A 3 'f + 4044.04 1„°�..ss My appointment expires; ? —0 1' rpt 19ASk101- t�"4�4t\ti+w4 8130(2003 Page 2 of 5 PART It LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner) , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE REST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWFTH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: PHONE: Ap ZIP; (City (State) if r (Signature) (Date) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SURSCRIRED AND SWORN to before me this day of , 20 NOTARY SEAL NOTARY SIGNATURE Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Residing at: My appointment expires: 6102OD3 Page 2 of 5 PART III SITE DATA ' . .. , a PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA(ACRES OR Sc..FT.) „ , Are ADJAG c ENT AREOWNED flR CDNTRD>LLEIS(ACRES OR SIFT. I Acre to north EXSTUNG USE CF POPERT1 Vacant and older residences. SCHOOL DISTRICT: Central Valley School District� FIRE DISTRICT. Fire District No . i WATERD1SrRIOT: Irwin Water District ' NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: iOri __ _. _ . a . PUBLIC CR PRIVATE ROADA.ccEssINL PROPERTY: Pines Road, Mansfield Avenue ' WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING PUBLIC/PRIVATE Rom" 5)0 ft on Pines, 155ft, is nsf i e id ACCESS TO EXISTING ORPLANNED ARTERIAL?(YIN) Yes. Pines Road, a State Highway _ _ Pines Road NAME OF ARTERIAL ROADS: PREVIOUS ZONING/LAND USE DECISION LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING ACTIONS INVOLVINGTHIS PROPERT : ZE-?8-'?5 s Agriciil-tural . to Restricted Industrial, approved by Board of County Coirnlrissioners, April 29, 1976 . CHANGED CONDITIONS - ' WHAT ARE THE CHANGES CONDITIONS HIGH WARRANTS THIS PROPOSED Cl-CANCE? The site was not appropriate for apar Lrrients in 1.976 , and is most certainly not appropriate for a e.rtments in 2003 . The site was categorized in the High Density Residential category without regard for the 'underlying zoning, characteristics of the area, proximity to the Freeway Interchange, noise from arterial and railroad traffic , and the utilization of other frontage properties along Pines Road for commercial and industrial purposes. Sewer lines are in the process of being extended along Mansfield Avenue" and a new traffic signal is planned at the Mansfield and Pines intersection. As .the area continues to develop, the site will be appropriate for comrneroial/'industrial/office uses. The County' s Comprehensive Plan shows Light Industrial to the south, Mixed Use and Commercial to the east, and High Density Residential to the north and east. i 6/412003 Page 3 of 5 • PROPOSAL PROVIDE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: Thomas S. Smith and Robert J . Warner, owners of a 2 .5 acre parcel; located on the west side of Pines Road between the Union Pacific Railroad tracks and Mansfield Avenue, request the the Generalized: Comprehensive Plan of the City of the Spokane Valley be changed from the High Density Residential category to the Light Industrial category to acknowledge the the 1-2 zone category granted to the property through a specific zoning request ( ZE-78-75) granted by Spokane County on April 29, 1976 for potential use of an office/ warehouse project. The subject property has been assessed as commercial property, dedications of additional rights-of-way have. been granted, sewer and water is available to the site, certain buildings demolished, and the site graded in anticipation of future commercial/industrial activities. The recent action by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County to classify the property High Density Residential efectively limits the development options available for the property. The owners consider this action a dc - zone and herein petition the City Council of the Spokane Valley to correct the comprehensive plan category to reflect past action's and to acknowledge the highest and best use of the property. The; site is not suitable for apartments or other high density residential uses because of the traffic ana noise along Pines Road, a state highway, proximity to I-90 and the Pines Interchange, and the impact of train passing mouth of -the--site--- -... . ...... . _ _ ADJACENT LAND USES DESCRIBE EXIS'T1NC LAND USES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF PROPOSAL: The subject property is vacant = . ' - z . • ope- . T thE futu �., . # , . e o ' -. Surrounding land .uses include the Union Pacific Railroad line immediately south. Spokane Transit Authority' s Park-n-Ride facility is south and southwest of the tracks . Washington State Department of Transportation has a yard and maintenenc e facility south of Indiana Avenue , abutting the freeway. Retail and in ,ustrial uses are established between Indiana and the freeway to the southwest and th the southeast of Pines Road. The; property to the west is occupied by an older trailer court. Propierties east of Pines Road include a sit-down restaurant, a professional office building, and a convenience stare. The property east of Pines and north of Mansfield includes an office _ building on the frontage properties along Pines , apartments to the east. Uses to the north include a vacant hillside parcel owned by the applicants, a water': tower and apartment sites. Properties to the northwest of the property lying north of Mansfield Avenue are developed as court apartments. Pines Road is maintained as a State Highway connection 1-90 with Trent Road. Traffic signals are installed at Indiana and the Pines • Interchange to accomodate Interchange traffic , Montgomery Drive industrial traffic and Indiana Ave . traffic from the Spokane Mall'. A future traffic signal is proposed at Mansfield and Pines to accommodate local access needs to busy Pines Road, 61412003 Page 4 of 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY DESCRIBE HOW PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-CITE SPECIFIC GOALSIPOLUCIES: UL. la Provide a healthful, safe and sustainable urban environment that offers a variety of opportunities for affordable housing and employment, Response . Commercial/industrial/office uses on the site provide employment ent in a growing an thriving portion of the Spokane Valley. UL, iL. 1 Identify and designate industrial gland areas for heavy industry and light industry . Response: Site is located on arterial next to freeway and adjacent industrial and commercial areas. 111. 14. 7 Encourage shared parking, pedestrian access and transit incentive programs in industrial development projects. Response : Site is near STA, Park--arid-amide facility. UL. 17. Establish and maintain land use regulations for industrial areas that protect their use into future and prevent land use conflicts.; Response : The 1-2 zone provides fortransition to residential uses to west, integration with adjoining commercial districts. DL17 .2 Access points should be combined and limited in number to allow smooth traffic flow on arterials. Access through residential areas should be avoided. Response : Site is located on major arteril (State Highway) with ready access to Pines and to Mansfield with no conflict with residential traffic . Site is ideally situated to reduce residential conflicts. UL, 17.5 Standards for setbacks, landscaping and noise barriers shall be developed to mitigate impacts between industrial development and ac j as exp land u es. Response: 1- 2 z ri€_ iia§-d 15xcp `i e.te Ititatdd dS;- PUBLIC FACILITIES DESCRIBE AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES, INCLUDING, ROADS,WATER, SEWER, PARKS,AND PUBLIC TRANSIT: The site fronts on Pines Road, a State Highway and lies north of the Pines Interchange, 1-90 , Irwin Water District serves the area ' with water sufficient for domestic use and fire protection. The site is north of the STA Park-and-Ride facility. A sewer trunk line is south of the Union Pacific Railroad tracks to the south. A. sewer extension is planned to extend along Mansfield to the north. Parks are maintaied along the Spokane River to the east and along Mission Avenue south of the freeway to the southwest. The site is served by a full complement of utilities including natural gas, electricity, and telephone services are available to the site, 6/412003 Page 5 of 6 ci ii' Department of CommunityDevelopment dielValley LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION DATE: August 5, 2003 FILE #: CPA-03-33 APPLICANT:John Konen (agent) Thomas Smith (owner) LOCATION: West side of Pines Road, between Union Panto Railroad right-of-way and Mansfield Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from High Density Residential to Light Industrial; corresponding zoning map amendment from Urban Residential-22 (UR-22), to I-2, Light Industrial. TP✓,f`ff+h!`Itl�`/'y�✓'fv�+kP.f*.fN.s�•'• /•l.M;^1`J'-.I.1'eJ`hY`l rVu,.+r1'.+1r`h(.r.J.1.F.M•'..^d•J`J.hr' /`J`J'..+1AJtirif/w '`l•.J•f`P."r' Background The subject property is located on the west side of Pines Road between the Union Pacific Railroad right-of--way and Mansfield Avenue_ The subject property is comprised of four separate parcels and is a total of approximately 2.5 acres in size, The subject property is currently vacant and is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north — Mansfield Avenue and vacant property and zoned UR-22; south — Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way; east— Pines Road and commercial uses and zoned B-3; and west-. Pinecroft Mobile Home Park zoned UR-22. The subject property was granted a rezone by Spokane County in 1976. The 1970 rezone to Restricted Industrial would have allowed construction of a future commercial/industrial development During the County's 2002 comprehensive plan update, the subject parcels were changed on the plan map to High Density Residential and subsequently rezoned to UR-22. SEPA Analysis The requested comprehensive plan map and rezone is considered a "non-project" action under SEPA. The applicant does not include provisions for a specific project at this time. The requested rezone, if approved, would result in a wide range of potential commercial, retail and light industrial land uses to be allowed on the subject property. Given the wide 1 range of potential uses that would be allowed under the requested 1-2 zoning, it would be extremely difficult to identify specific impacts with potential development of the subject property. A more appropriate time to assess the development impacts of this property would be at the time a project specific related environmental review is conducted. Recommendation Staff recommends that a Determination of Nonsignificance be issued for the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment. 2 ofoktio City of Spokane Valley DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Request a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from High Density Residential I€_Light Induseral and a rezone from'Urban Residential-22,to 1-2,Light Industrial. Proponent: City of Spokane Valley Location of proposal, including street address, if any! This action is considered a noxi-pest action under RCW 43.210 and is specifically located cm the southwest corner of Pines Road and Mansfield Avenue in the SE'A of Section 9,Township 25 iVorth. Mange 44 IrVVl►+I Spokane all y Vkiasl,angton Lead agency: City of Spokane Valley. The Iead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a praFable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under ROAr 43.21C.030(2)(c), This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request I j There is no continent period for this DNS. j I This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in section 197-11-355 WAC. There is no further Comment period on the DNS. (Alis D1 S is issued under 197-11-340(2);the lead agency will not a on this ro anal.for "` 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by ieWX- Responsible official: Marina Sukup,AICP Position/title: Director of Community Development Phone:(509}921-1000 Address: 11707 East Sprague Avenger Suite/06:Spokane Valley,WA 94206 Date O - Gf5. - Oa Signature L�.a,_•,_ er, _ P You may appeal this determination to (name) Marina Sukup at(location) City Hall located at 11707 East Sprague Avenue,Spokane Valley,WA no later than(date) 5:00 by(method) Written Statement of Appeal You should be prepared to make specific factual objections_ Contact Greg McCormick.MU'tci read or ask about the procedures for SE.PA appeals. 1 Distribution List: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Department of Public Works,Gerry Gernznill 3. Spokane Regional Health District;Steve Holderby 4. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement,Jeff Forry 5. Washington State Department of Transportation;Mark Rohwer 6. Spokane County Fre Protection District No. 1 7. Spokane County Fire Protection District No 8 8. Carnhape Inigatiori District No. 7 9. Consolidated Irrigation District No.19 10, East Spokane Water District No.1 11. Hutchinson Irrigation District No. 16 12. Irvin Water District No. 6 13. Model Irrigation District No. 18 14. Modem Electric Water Company 15. Spokane County Water District No.3 16. Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3 17. Vera Irrigation District No. 18. City Of Spokane,John Mercer 19. City of Liberty Lake, Doug Smith 20. City of Millwood.,Heather Cannon 21. Central Valley School District,Dave Jackman 22. East Volley School District,12325 E.Grace 23. West Valley School District,Dave Smith 2 TVicinity Map L --_,., , L_________Th\-\.j \\,\\ er r I.1 CEO LI 1111 r. -111 MMnstildi - --- I ' .- --'. .,,,_,._ ______..-j . iTerAlli SI V — 1 i 000 ____k_ Vil I L {-- °O ___J Mont?omen! V IPPIP in- 87afi t90 Plimmoommiglill 19D .1 f e ____y,/FF"'-'-'--------------i ___HIC -�IIiH : W V ' I _1 L---J . _ . • 0 — 1J I. —76:Th_T--.„I r NT 4 ` 7 r____ ___, ., August 15, 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment 400 CPA-03-03 Sfilikane Feet 0000 ValleY is. S =,,:-,r r4' C ' O Department of Community Development po . . ne LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION ./ .0„,v 11 . e Staff Report Subject: 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Staff: Greg McCormick, AICP — Long Range Planning Manager Scott Kuhta, AJCP — Long Range Planner Marina Sukup, AICP— Community Development Director Background The Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from July 2nd to July 'lst of the following year. Applications received prior to July 1$t are considered by the Planning Commission in August and September, with a recommendation forwarded to the City Council in later September or early October. A decision by the City Council is to be made no later than December of each year. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received 7 requests for site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendments for 2001 Sites that are approved for a comprehensive plan amendment will automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation. Attachments to this report include application materials, SEPA documentation, land use maps and zoning maps to assist the Commission's review. Notice The Community Development Department placed advertisements in the Spokesman- Review on June 5, 7, '12 and 14, 2003, notifying the public that comprehensive plan amendment applications would be accepted until July 1, 2003. On August 13, 2003, notice Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amerxdments of the Planning Commission's public hearing was placed in the Spokesman-Review. Each site was posted with a "Notice of Land Use Application" sign, which included a map and description of the proposal_ Finally, individual notice of the proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each amendment. SEPA Review Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA— RCW 43.21 C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Under SEPA, amendments to the comprehensive plan are considered "non-project actions' which are defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the actual development of the subject properties. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Nonsignificance (DNS) were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on August 8, 2003. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on August 13, 2003 consistent with City of Spokane Valley requirements, Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals CPA-03-01 Applicant: Gib Brumback Request: Change the land use designation from Low-Density Residential to Regional Commercial and the zoning from UR-7 (UR-7) to ( -3). Location: 8915 East Montgomery-West of Argonne Rd., on the north side of Montgomery and south of the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way. Site Area: 2.76 acres Existing Use: 15,000 sq. ft. self-storage building, self serve car wash and RVdtruck storage. Adjacent Uses: Railroad to the north, commercial to the west, residential to the south. Public Facilities: The property is currently served with public water and sewer and is accessed from a paved, public street. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The subject property was zoned commercial in 1970. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low-Density Residential and applied the August 14, 20003 Pegs 2 of Staff Report 20D3 Comprehensive Plan Amendments UR-7 zone. The request is to re-establish the previous commercial zoning and be consistent with existing uses on subject property_ Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The interim Comprehensive Plan [and use map designates the Argonne corridor between 1-90 and Trent Ave. as a Community Center, which is a higher-intensity, mixed-use area designed to serve two or more neighborhoods. These areas have a mix of uses, including commercial, civic, high-density residential and recreational uses. Existing zoning along the Argonne corridor is largely B-3 and UR-22 transitioning to UR- 3.5. The Applicant requests that the Regional Commercial land use designation be applied to the subject property. This designation is not consistent with the adjacent Community Center designation. Recommendation Change property to Community Center, consistent with adjacent properties. Apply the B-2 zone consistent with the Phase 1 Development Regulations. All current uses on the property are allowed in the B-2 zone. (See Attachment 1 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related naps.) CPA-03-02 Applicant: Associated Restaurants, Inc. (Richard Repp) Request: Change land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Regional Commercial and zoning from B-1 to 8-3. The application indicates that the property is designated Medium Density residential, which is not correct. Location: South side of Appleway Blvd. across from Dishman Dodge, east of Park Road. Site Area: 3 acres Existing Use: The property is currently vacant. Adjacent Uses: The Rose Haven Mobile Home Park is located directly west of the subject property, with vacant hillside land to the south and east. Dishman Dodge is located across Appleway to the north. Public Facilities: The subject property is located within East Spokane Water District# 1 (WATER RIGHTS?? The area was sewered by Spokane County in 2001 and is accessed by Appleway Blvd. Previous Land Use/Zoning: In December, 2001, the property was zoned Neighborhood Commercial (B-i) by Spokane County_ The Applicant originally requested the County to August 14, 2O 3 page 3 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments zone the property B-3, which was conditionally approved by the Hearing Examiner. This decision was appealed to be Board of County Commissioners, who decided to zone the property B-1 in December, 2001. The major issue concerning this property is the potential impact commercial development will have on the Dishman Hills Natural Area, located south of the site and the precedent that would be set by allowing commercial development south of Appleway. Spokane County adopted their Comprehensive Plan in November, 2001 and Phase 1 Development Regulations implementing the Comprehensive Plan in January, 2002, The 2001 Comprehensive Plan designated the subject property Medium Density Residential with the Phase 1 Regulations applying the UR-12 zoning designation. The zoning history of the subject property was brought to the City Council's attention prior to the date of incorporation. When the Council adopted the County's Comprehensive Plan, the subject property received the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation. This was followed with a zone change to Neighborhood Commercial, consistent with the decision made by the County Commissioners in December, 2001, Comprehensive Plan'Zoning Analysis: The entire south side of Appleway Blvd., from Coleman to Sargent Ave., is designated Medium Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan map, except for the subject property, which is currently designated Neighborhood Commercial. Property north of Appleway is designated Medium Density Residential and Regional Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Regional Commercial category as intensive commercial areas intended to draw customers from the County at large and other outlying areas. Regional shopping centers and major commercial areas will be designated with this classification, The Neighborhood Commercial classification designates small-scale neighborhood-serving retail and office use. Community Commercial designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods, Recommendation: The proposed site is bound by a manufactured home park to the west and hills to the south and east. These constraints, and the size of the subject property, will limit development in this area to the subject site. The Neighborhood Commercial designation does not appear appropriate in this instance because the site will not serve a single neighborhood. Further, at 3 acres, the site is large enough to support commercial businesses that will riot fit into the Neighborhood Commercial classification, either by size or intensity. Conversely the Regional Commercial designation is perhaps too intense for this particular site. Staff recommends designating the property Community Commercial and applying the B-2 zone, which will allow mere flexibility and marketability to the site, but will limit future impacts of development that would be allowed under the Regional Commercial designation and B-3 zone. (See Attachment 2 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 4 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-03-03 Applicant: Thomas Smith Request: Change the lard use designation from High Density Residential to Light Industrial and change zoning from UR-22 to I-2. Location: West side of Pines Road between the Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way and Mansfield Avenue. Site Area: 2.5 acres Existing Use: Vacant Adjacent Uses: Property to the west, across Pines Rd., includes a restaurant, an office and a convenience store. A mobile home court is directly west of the site and the Union Pacific railroad right-cf way adjacent to the south property line. Public Facilities: Public water is available to the site through Irvin Water District. The area is scheduled for sewer construction during 2003; however, the Applicant recently opted out of the County's sewer program. The County would have provided a sewer stub to the property from the sewer extension along Mansfield Avenue and charged the property with a sewer general facility. The Applicant decided to opt out of the program, indicating that he would be responsible to extend a sewer line under the railroad right-of- way ight-ofway to an existing main line. Ineither case, any new development would be required to connect to the public sewer system. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The property was zoned Restricted Industrial in 1976, which would have allowed construction of a commercial/industrial development. In 20151, Spokane County designated the properly High Density Residential and followed with a UR- 22 zoning designation in 2002. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The Interim Comprehensive Plan designates a large area west of Pines and north of the railroad right-of-way High Density Residential This category allows for multi-family apartments and office uses. Land on the east side of Pines is designated Community Center, an intense mixed-use area. Property to the south, including the railroad property, is designated Light Industrial. The Comprehensive Plan states that Light Industrial category "is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility". Office and commercial uses that support and compliment the industrial areas are allowed. Recommendation: Change property to Light Industrial and zone I-2, consistent with previous 1976 zoning end policies within the Interim Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 3 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 5 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Ran Amendments CPA-03-44 Applicant: Doug Lydig (John Sweitzer, Agent) Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial and zoning from UR-7 to 1-2. Location: Golf Dome property at Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and adjacent to Beauty Bark. Site Area: 2.57 acres Existing Use: Indoor golf practice facility. Adjacent Uses; Industrial and commercial uses, including a landscape supply business to the east, a UPS trucking facility to the west and scattered residential parcels to the north. Public Facilities: Public sewer won't be available to the site until 2005. Public water is supplied by Spokane County Water District Nc. 3. The site is accessed by a public road. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The site was rezoned from 1-2 to B-3 by Spokane County in 1994 to allow for construction of the indoor golf facility and pro shop. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low Density Residential and followed with a UR-7 zoning designation in 2002. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The subject property is surrounded on three sides by Light Industrial property, with Low-Density Residential property to the north. The requested Light Industrial designation is consistent with the surrounding designations. Recommendation: Change land use designation to Light Industrial and change zoning to 1-2. (See Attachment 4 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) CPA-03-05 Applicant: Dave IVerren (Lexington Homes) Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and change zoning from UR-3.5 to UR-22. Location: Between Broadway and Cataldo Avenue, west of Pines Road. Site Area: 3 acres August 14, 2003 Page 6 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendrmmits Existing Use: Largely vacant except for a single-family dwelling. Adjacent Uses: Residential/vacant land to the west, single-family residential to the north and east. Public Facilities: The property has public sewer available; water is provided by Modern Electric 1 Fater Company. Access to the site is from Broadway Avenue, a four lane principal arterial. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The subject property has been zoned single-family residential for many years. Property directly east received a zone change to UR-22 in 1978 and is designated High Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The subject site is located within a transition area between single-family residential and office uses. Property directly east is designated High Density Residential while property to the west and north is designated Low Density Residential; property south, across Broadway, is designated Medium Density Residential and zoned UR-22. The request is consistent with Policies UL.2.16, UL.2.20 and Goal UL.7 of the Urban Land Use chapter of the Interim Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation: Change property to High Density Residential and change zoning to UR-22. (See Attachment 5 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps) CPA-03-06 Applicant: Harold Sarff Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential, Location: North side of Broadway, west of Evergreen Road between Blake and learner Rd. Site Area: 5+ acres Existing Zoning/Land Use: The property is currently zoned UR-22 and is developed with a independent retirement complex called Broadway Court Estates. The Applicant is requesting to expand the facility to the east, into vacant residential property. Adjacent Uses: The site is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north — vacant land zoned UR-3.5; south — Broadway Avenue, church and single family zoned UR- 3.5; east—single family residential zoned UR-3.5; and west— unimproved Blake Road and Blake elementary piayfields zoned UR-3.5. August t4, 2003 Page 7 of g Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Facilities: The site is currently served with water by Vera Water and Power and is connected to public sewer. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The majority of the proposed site was zoned UR-22 in 1998 to allow for the development of the retirement facility. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low Density Residential but did not change the UR-22 zoning. Therefore, the existing Comprehensive Plan designation is not consistent with the current zone and use of the property. The proposed expansion area to the east is designated Low Density Residential and zoned UR-3.5. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: It appears that the County erred in designating the subject property Low Density Residential in 2001. The expansion area to the east would not have a significant impact on the neighborhood and is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy UL 2.17. Recommendation: Change the entire site to High Density Residential, including the separate parcel fronting Broadway and surrounded by the subject property. Apply the UR- 22 zone to the expansion area. (See Attachment B for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps) CPA-03-07 Applicant: P &T Partners (John Peterson. Agent) Request: Change property from Low-Density Residential to High-Density Residential on the western portion and Community Commercial on the eastern portion. The requested zoning is UR-22 on the western portion and B-2 on the eastern portion. Location: The property is located on the west side of Barker Road, between Boone and Sharp Avenue. Site Area: Total area is about 3 acres, which will be split approximately in half by the Community Commercial/High Density Residential designations. Existing Use: The eastern portion is developed with a convenience store/service station and fast food restaurant. The western portion is vacant. Adjacent Uses: Property to the north is currently being developed into a R.V./Boat storage facility; south is Washington State D.O.T. property (part of the I-901Barker interchange); east and west is residential. Public Facilities: Water is served by Consolidated Irrigation District#19; access is via public roads maintained by Spokane County. The existing convenience store/fast food restaurant is connected to the County's sewer line on Barker Rd. by a private 2' line. August 14, 2003 Page 8 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Development of the western portion may require connection to the County's sewer line to the west, which is yet to beconstructed. Kevin Cooke, Spokane County Utilities, informed the Community Development Staff that a line will be constructed about 1000' east of the Flora and Mission intersection. The developer of the subject properly would be required to extend sewer to this location, rather than east to Barker Road. Engineering issues aside, future development on the site would be required to connect to theCounty's public sewer system. Previous Land Use&Zoning: The property was converted to 1-2 zoning in 1957, 195B and 1971. The convenience store was constructed in 2000. In 2001, Spokane County designated the area Low-Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map and applied the UR-7 zone. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The existing use of the property is not consistent with the current Low-Density Residential designation and UR-7 zoning. The requested Community Commercial designation for the eastern portion of the site is consistent with the existing use. The Comprehensive Plan describes Community Commercial as "areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods". Policy UL.2.16 encourages the location of medium and high density residential categories near commercial areas and public open spaces and on sites with good access to arterials. Policy UL.2.17 encourages multifamily homes to be integrated into or next to neighborhood, community or urban activity centers; and integrated into small, scattered parcels throughout existing residential areas. Recommendation: Community Development staff supports the requested Community Commercial designation for the existing commercial business on the eastern portion of the site. However, staff does not support designating the western portion High Density Residential, but does recommend designating the site Medium Density Residential. This will provide for a better transition between commercial and single-family residential and will have less impact on the existing single-family neighborhood. (See Attachment 7 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 9 of - - ft5(1,1Ji c.) -5-r-'"Fr3. 5/6 of , or-- r -t T' � , 16) CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission. August 28, 2003 Name: c .d'', _ Aror_ ,o: . Address 0 J , Agenda Item; Y / 2 ? 1b For Proposal Opposed to Proposal hieuiral Wish to Speak- Yes No • • f--- 1-1• l fl---- Comprehensive Plan 1 , Land Use Map _ ,--i -- 1 _ _ --L- , . I 7-c 1 ...„ „.., . Site V Dahl-net— _ 0A 3 ,---' .•:.-/7---''' / i1 i1=1---I•4-- ',• • i- 1 i r I 4 —Th - 1 — - 1 = —1 - --- Comp Plan Category ( .. , ,! Low Density Residential ) ; .." Medium Density Residential . / - - 1111 - i Min High Density Residential - (.0.,-- -- Neighborhood Commercial — , 1 'tik Community Commercial - , : OM Reginnal Commercial Mixed Use wig CorriMUnitif Center N NM Urban Activity Center + i Light industrial Heavy rndustnal -.I 1 Mineral Land _1; L __ -- ,... I _ ______ August 15,2003 atic"\rft., Comprehensive Plan Amendment Sfiekane 410 -I Feet CPA-03-04 0Valley I - Zoning Map : ...., - —, 1 Er Lia.--- irhk,rii_11 Lsierj___ -,- ' . 1 '-- ---'1 ri um itiVrii I., 1 1 . 1i '2'F yV. 41MI bffi ___ ._ . i: • 7 t_ , 1111 Site 7 1 ,0,,,,,,/„ .. liv A . , , iz-/- ___ _ _ . 1 01 _..,iii :.._,, j ,,,.,.,,', \\\\ ,,..1 0 , .. - . _ - .__.___,-/-----c,\ \\\\ ,:,,z4.,7,---- • . , ' . , ri .. . 1 (I \ , ,. MI =in fF.- f 7. �. !'Zoning Class ..,401111.1 — " IUR-3.5 I UR-12 ! .. res,e r/e#. ;/:.: 1 / - - . , 13-2 1-1 ;/./. '. 1 ` II R iii /: ' / . 77k, !VT . h . • . . //rA/...„/./7 ii. / August 15, 2CO3 Comprehensive Plan Amendment `.�, 4.014° , i a ne 400 CPA-03-04 4000Valley I !Feet -a 0 ct FILE No. Srake City of Spokane Valley Application for 40001/1411eY Comprehensive Plan Amendment PART I APPLICANT NAME: Doug.r i PHONE: _ ADDRESS: PO Eax 11035 EMAIL: CITY/STATE/ZIP: EFolcane, Wash. 99211 — I FAX: PROPERTY OWNER I OF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT NAME: N/A PHONE: ADDRESS: EMAIL: CITY/STATE/ZIP: FAX: PROPERTY OWNER 2 (IF MORE THAW TWO PROPERTY OWNERS,ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET) - NAME: N,WAPHONE:..._ ADDRESS: EMAIL: Cr Y/STATE/ZIP: FAQ{: AGENTICONSULTANTIATTORMEY NAME: Rahn T. Sweitzer _ I ADDRESS: 1202 E. Se Ave., Ste 211 EMAIL:j itzezca@h ►i rai.l.car CITY/STATE/ZIP' x. FAx: 5.07247-m8618 J- a LAND USE MAP CHANGE PROPOSAL: CURRENT DESIGNATION PROPOSED DESIGNATION LAND USE MAP Density Residential L Light Industz-al._ ZONING MAP "LA- " COMPREFIENSIWE PLAN POLICY CHANGE PROPOSAL ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY): CURRENT POLICY R EC E 1 \IE D �- — __-- JU PROPOSED POLICY City of Spokane Valley OFFICEUS�LY: © City initiated a itizen Initiated Concurrency Review Required: ID Yes $ ❑ No Date Received: Co --1/c.) -03 Received By: . _4. . 6/412003 Page I of 5 PART IL LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by lege!owner) I. #' L`G4T) r LA , (print name) SWEAR DR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR. IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: I 1 U PHONE; f -4J7o aPocest, ZIP: 2 Lna, -- (State) IZI5O3 Si turar e — (Date) NOTARY STATE CF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this . day of 9:i , 20,03 NOTARY SEAL c13441 NOTAd SIGNATURE Notary Public in a for the State of Washington Residing at; My appointment expires: '-A - a JJ 61412003 Page 2 of 5 PART SITE DATA PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA(ACRES OR Std-FT.) 2.57 Acres ADJACENT ARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED(ACRES OR SO.FT.) 1.67 Acres EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: SI:orts D rriG Golf SCHooL DISTRICT West Talley FIRE DISTRICT: - 1 ►,• 1_ WATER DISTRICT: Spokane Irrigation Dist. No. 3 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: PUaL]C OR PRIVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY: _c. talda WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING PUBLIC!'PRIVATE ROAD: 20' subjeetL9O'+ fran adjacent arceL ACCEss TD EXISTING OR PLANNED ARTERIAL?(YIN) No NAME OF ARTERIAL ROADS: Cataldo to Hradl` FarrCher PREVIOUS ZONING/LAND USE DECISION LIST PREVIOUS PLANiNI NICE ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: June 23, 1994 . . . . Spokane County Rezone from Light Industrial (1-2) to Regional BusineRs ( 3) for indoor sports arena, (ZE 10-94) ; also a variance for a 65' building height was approved NE-16-94) . .'� Vanua 13, 2002 � CountyCrrpraen ivy Plan and zone change to Low-Density Residential, and " r" zone. CHANGED CONDITIONS WHAT ARE THE CHANGES CONDITIONS WHICH WARRANTS THIS PROPOSED CHANGE? * Site is located in an industrial neighborhood and. has access and frontage from Cataldo, a public access road that serves the Eby anc'her industrial neighborhood. * Property to the east, west and south is industrial. * The 1.67 acre parcel adjacent and to the south and.the subject have been developed as one parcel. The parking for the subject improvements is located on the parcel to the south which is zoned "I-2, Light Industrial." * The subject is improved with a cc rrtnrcialllndustrial use. * Spokane County rade a "rnis7,a we,li in rezoning the subject to "UR-7." 614/2003 Page 3 of 5 PROPOSAL -_ PROVIDE GENERAL DESCRIPTION O PROPOSAL. The subject and the 1.67 acre parcel to the south are irnpr[ el with a 35,400 sf dome building (maxiimra height of 65' ) and attached office. The building is located on the subject site and 63 parking spaces are located on the adjacent 1.67 acre parcel on the south. ADJACENT LAND USES - --_-- �- I DESCRIBE EXISTING LAND USES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF PROPOSAL: North: Scattered residential; a number of cuj nercial home occupation uses. South: Industrial/I-90 East: Beauty lark Plus (landscape supplies business) West: UPS - Office and warehouse 6/4/2D03 Paye 4 of 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY- - -- _ DESCRIBE How PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-CITE SPECIFIC GOALS/POLICIES: THE SUBJECT SITE HAD.A LNDUSTRIA.L COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION'AND AND WAS ZONED 1-2 PRIOR TO JUNE 1994,WHEN THE SITE WAS RE-ZONED B-3.IN 2202 THE SITE WAS REDESIGNATED LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL,AND REZONED AS -7. THE PROPERTY TS LOCATED ADJACENT AND TO THE NORTH AND EAST CF LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DESIGNATED PROPERTY THAT IS ZONED 1-2. TAS PROPOSAL WILL PERM'LAND USES THAT IS COMPATIBLE WITH ADJACENT LAND USE. THE SITE HAS BEEN DEVELOPED FOR A COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL USE. THIS PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREEE'SIVE PLAN POLICY; 1,11..16.3,UL.16.4; ULw.17.1, 1T1,17.2 AND 1.11.17.3 PUBLIC FACILITIES DESCRIBE AVAILABILITY OF PUOLIC FACaJTCESAND SERVICES, INCLUDING, ROADS, WATER, SES, PARKS,AND PUBLIC TRANSIT: ALL PUBLIC SERVICES ARE AVAILABLE EXCEPT FOR PUBLIC SEWER WHICH WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE LN THE NEXT 5 TO 10 YEAR f. THE SLI-BJE[ T 517E HAS BEEN DELELOPED WITH A COMMCERCIALI INDUSTRIAL USE. 6/3012003 Page 5 of 5 Department.. , e , crib , n --.--..., of Community Development s . p e y 400110011P Val\7álicy LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION DATE: August 5, 2003 FILE #: CPA-03-04 APPLICANT:John Sweitzer (agent), Doug Lydig (owner) LOCATION: Access to the site is provided by Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley, and north Cataido and Interstate 90 rights-of-way, Spokane Valley, WA REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial; corresponding zoning map amendment from Urban Residential-7 (UR-7), to 1-2, Light Industrial, ,,,,.J\.`.,,-✓-,,,,,✓v,-,,, I` ,,,,,r^,, ✓,,,,'fI,✓ ,,,,...-r,.,',.,.#-F•..,,,,. r ., .„r..-, ,.,f..'1`J-1->,.'-h/'J..,-,. • Background The subject property gains access from the terminus of Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and is located in the NE Y4 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 43 EWM. The subject property is comprised of approximately 2.57 acres and is currently developed with an enclosed golf practice facility. The site is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north — some residential and zoned UR-3.5; south — Cataldo Avenue and Interstate 90 right-of-way; east — residential uses and zoned UR-3.5, and west — industrial uses and zoned 1-2, Light Industrial. The subject property was granted a rezone by Spokane County in 1994_ The 1994 rezone to B-3, Regional Commercial from 1^2, Light Industrial allowed the construction of the indoor golf practice facility and pro shop. During the County's 2002 comprehensive plan update, the subject parcel was changed on the comprehensive plan map to Low Density Residential and subsequently rezoned to UR-7. This change has resulted in the existing use becoming "nonconforming”. SEPA Analysis The requested comprehensive plan map and rezone is considered a "non-project' action under SEPA. The applicant does not include provisions to construct or change the existing use at this time. The requested rezone, if approved, would not result in an immediate 1 change to the current use on the property. A more appropriate time to assess the development impacts of this property would be at a future date when a project specific related environmental review as conducted. Recommendation Staff recommends that a Determination of Nonsignificance be issued for the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment. 2 F161k";"1.-7i./ City of Spokane Valley DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal west a Comprehensive Plan Map amendutent from Low Density Residential. to Li.ht Industrial and a rezone from Urban Residential-3.5 to I-2 ' ht Indus. 'aL Proponent City of Spokane Valley Location of proposal, including street address. if any; This action is considered a non-project action ruder RCW 43.21G and is sreciificall• located at the terminus of Cataldo Avenue west of liradl• in the NE ala of Section 13 Townshi. 25 No Ran: 43 -S.okane Valle Washin_ n. Lead agency: City of Spokane Valley. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact Statement (ELS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request [ I There is no comment period for this DNS. [ ] This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in sec on 197-11-3 5 WAC. There is no further comment period on the DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2);the lead agency will not on thisaa]s .fo 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by S Responsible official: Marina Sukup,AICP Position/title: Director of Community Development Phone; (509)921-1000 Address; 11707 East S+ra e Aven • Suite 106•S okane Vali- WA 99206 Date •C'-‘!3 C8,• CaS Signature _ LJ -. . x Lc- You .You may appeal this determination to(name) Marina Sukup at(location) City Hall located at 117_07 Fast S e Avenue S okane Valley.WA no later than(date) 5:00 p.m_ by(method) Written Statement of Appeal You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Greg McCormick,AICD to read or ask about the procedures for 5t.1-1t.appeals. 1 Distrabuti3Ont List: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Department of Public Works,Gerry Gemnt l 3. Spokane Regional Health District Steve Holderby 4. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement,Jeff Forry 5. Washington State Department of Transportation;Mark Rawer 6. Spokane County Fire Protection District No.1 7. Spokane County Fire Protection District No.8 8. Ca rnhope Irrigation District No. 7 9. Consolidated Irrigation District No.19 10. East Spokane Water District No. 1 11. Hutchinson Irrigation District 16 12. Irvin Water District No.6 13. Model Irrigation District No. 1$ 14. Modern.Electric Water Company 15. Spokane County Water District No.3 16. Trcntwaod Irrigation District No.3 17. Vera Irrigation District No.15 18. City Of Spokane,John Mercer 19. City of Liberty Lake, Doug Smith 20. City of Millwood,Heather Cannon 21. Central Valley School District,Dave Jackman 22. East Valley School District,12325 E. Grace 23. West Valley School District,Dave Smith 2 Vicinity Map NM pm-- ,liAmi ___EL 1 -,._ 1 op via ALEI , * vAiopp# 4po . . .+1Viir " . . 4* iiiiiii,ffis I ,. .L _ • v r ez or, m . [ Site re, i lPe, 1. V • iii0 'All II \\' . P ' ' idi • H . . - in Deal t 1" 1.1. ____ww � 1111114 MO luSeillOrr ., i - ,, ... //cIP i 0yi,- I os„ 4. tiVDE2$6OFF 3 , 5 August 15, aos Comprehensive Plan Amendment 400 CPA-03 04e 1 Feet .4000 Valley ' j, a'yq SjG1ine "�'��. Department of Community Development LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION 400Availey Staff Re po rt Subject: 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Staff: Greg McCormick, AICP — Long Range Planning Manager Scott Kuhta, AICP— Long Range Planner Marina Sulcup, A1CP —Community Development Director Background The Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from July 2`'d to July 1't of the following year. Applications received prior to July -15' are considered by the Planning Commission in August and September, with a recommendation forwarded to the City Council in later September or early October. A decision by the City Council is to be made no later than December of each year. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received 7 requests for site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendments for 2003, Sites that are approved for a comprehensive plan amendment will automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation_ Attachments to this report include application materials, SEPA documentation, land use maps and zoning maps to assist the Commission's review. Notice The Community Development Department placed advertisements in the Spokesman- Review on June 5, 7, 12 and 14, 2003, notifying the public that comprehensive plan amendment applications would be accepted until July 1, 2003. On August 13, 2003, notice Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments of the Planning Commission's public hearing was placed in the Spokesman-Review. Each site was posted with a "Notice of Land Use Application" sign, which included a map and description of the proposal. Finally, individual notice of the proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each amendment. SEPA Review Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA-- RGV'W 43.2-1C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Under SEPA, amendments to the comprehensive plan are considered "non-project actions' which are defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the actual development of the subject properties. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Nonsignificance (DNS) were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on August 8, 2003. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on August 13, 2003 consistent with City of Spokane Valley requirements. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals CPA-03-01 Applicant: Gib Brumback Request Change the land use designation from Low-Density Residential to Regional Commercial and the zoning from UR-7 (UR-7) to (B-3). Location: 8915 East Montgomery-West of Argonne Rd., on the north side of Montgomery and south of the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way. Site Area: 2.76 acres Existing Use: 15,000 sq. ft. self-storage building, self serve car wash and RV/truck storage. Adjacent Uses: Railroad to the north, commercial to the west, residential to the south. Public Facilities: The property is currently served with public water and sewer and is accessed from a paved, public street. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The subject property was zoned commercial in 1970. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low-Density Residential and applied the August 14, 2003 Page 2 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments UR-7 zone. The request is to re-establish the previous commercial zoning and be consistent with existing uses on subject properly. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The interim Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the Argonne corridor between 1-90 and Trent Ave. as a Community Center, which is a higher-intensity, mixed-use area designed to serve two or more neighborhoods. These areas have a mix of uses, including commercial, civic, high-density residential and recreational uses. Existing zoning along the Argonne corridor is largely Bel and UR-22 transitioning to UR- 3.5. The Applicant requests that the Regional Commercial land use designation be applied to the subject property. This designation is not consistent with the adjacent Community Center designation. Recommendation Change property to Community Center, consistent with adjacent properties_ Apply the B-2 zone consistent with the Phase 1 Development Regulations. All current uses on the property are allowed in the B-2 zone. (See Attachment 1 far application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps) CPA-03-02 Applicant: Associated Restaurants, Inc. (Richard Repp) Request: Change land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Regional Commercial and zoning from B-1 to B-3. The application indicates that the property is designated Medium Density residential, which is not correct. Location: South side of Appleway Blvd. across from Dishman Dodge, east of Park Road. Site Area: 3 acres Existing Use: The property is currently vacant. Adjacent Uses: The Rose Haven Mobile Home Park is located directly west of the subject property, with vacant hillside land to the south and east. Dishman Dodge is located across Appleway to the north. Public Facilities: The subject property is located within East Spokane Water District# 1 (WATER RIGHTS?? The area was sewered by Spokane County in 2001 and is accessed by Appleway Blvd. Previous Land UselZoning: In December, 2001, the property was zoned Neighborhood Commercial (B-1) by Spokane County. The Applicant originally requested the County to August 14, 2003 Page 3 or9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments zone the property B-3, which was conditionally approved by the Hearing Examiner. This decision was appealed to be Board of County Commissioners, who decided to zone the property B-1 in December, 2001. The major issue concerning this property is the potential impact commercial development will have on the Dishmari Hills Natural Area, located south of the site and the precedent that would be set by allowing commercial development south of Appleway. Spokane County adopted their Comprehensive Plan in November, 2001 and Phase 1 Development Regulations implementing the Comprehensive Plan in January, 2002. The 2001 Comprehensive 'Plan designated the subject property Medium Density Residential with the Phase Regulations applying the JR-12 zoning designation. The zoning history of the subject property was brought to the City Council's attention prior to the date of incorporation. When the Council adopted the County's Comprehensive Plan, the subject property received the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation. This was followed with a zone change to Neighborhood Commercial, consistent with the decision made by the County Commissioners in December, 2001. Comprehensive Plan!Zoning Analysis: The entire south side of Appleway Blvd., from Coleman to Sargent Ave., is designated Medium Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan map, except for the subject property, which is currently designated Neighborhood Commercial, Property north of Appleway is designated Medium Density Residential and Regional Commercial, The Comprehensive Plan describes the Regional Commercial category as intensive commercial areas intended to draw customers from the County at large and other outlying areas. Regional shopping centers and major commercial areas will be designated with this classification, The Neighborhood Commercial classification designates small-scale neighborhood-serving retail and office use. Community Commercial designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Recommendation: The proposed site is bound by a manufactured home park to the west and hills to the south and east. These constraints, and the size of the subject property, will limit development in this area to the subject site. The Neighborhood Commercial designation does not appear appropriate in this instance because the site will not serve a single neighborhood. Further, at 3 acres, the site is large enough to support commercial businesses that will not fit into the NeighborhoodCommercial classification, either by size or intensity. Conversely, the Regional Commercial designation is perhaps too intense for this particular site. Staff recommends designating the property Community Commercial and applying the B-2 zone, which will allow more flexibility and marketability to the site, but will limit future impacts of development that would be allowed under the Regional Commercial designation and B-3 zone. (See Attachment 2 for application materials, SENA documentation and related maps) August 14, 2003 Page 4 of Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-03-03 Applicant: Thomas Smith Request; Change the land use designation from High Density Residential to Light Industrial and change zoning from UR-22 to 1-2. Location: West side of Pines Road between the Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way and Mansfield Avenue. Site Area: 2.5 acres Existing Use: Vacant Adjacent Uses: Property to the west, across Pines Rd., includes a restaurant, an office and a convenience store. A mobile home court is directly west of the site and the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way adjacent to the south property line. Public Facilities: Public water is available to the site through Irvin Water District. The area is scheduled for sewer construction during 2003; however, the Applicant recently opted out of the County's sewer program. The County would have provided a sewer stub to the property from the sewer extension along Mansfield Avenue and charged the property with a sewer general facility. The Applicant decided to opt out of the program, indicating that he would be responsible to extend a sewer line under the railroad right-of- way to an existing main line. In either case, any new development would be required to connect to the public sewer system. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The property was zoned Restricted Industrial in 1976, which would have allowed construction of a commercial/industrial development, In 2001, Spokane County designated the property High Density Residential and followed with a UR- 22 zoning designation in 2002. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The Interim Comprehensive Plan designates a large area west of Pines and north of the railroad right-of-way High Density Residential. This category allows for multi-family apartments and office uses. Land on the east side of Fines is designated Community Center, an intense mixed-use area. Property to the south, including the railroad property, is designated Light Industrial. The Comprehensive Plan states that Light Industrial category"is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility". Office and commercial uses that support and compliment the industrial areas are allowed. Recommendation: Change property to Light Industrial and zone 1-2, consistent with previous 1976 zoning and policies within the interim Comprehensive Plan_ (See Attachment 3 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 5 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensfve Plan Amendments CPA-03-04 Applicant: Doug Lydig (John Sweitzer, Agent) Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to Light industrial and zoning from UR-7 to 1-2. Location: Golf Dome property at Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and adjacent to Beauty Bark. Site Area; 2.57 acres Existing Use: Indoor golf practice facility. Adjacent Uses: Industrial and commercial uses, including a landscape supply business to the east, a UPS trucking facility to the west and scattered residential parcels to the north. Public Facilities: Public sewer won't be available to the site until 2005. Public water is supplied by Spokane County Water District tslo, 3. The site is accessed by a public road. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The site was rezoned from 1-2 to 8-3 by Spokane County in 1994 to allow for construction of the indoor golf facility and pro shop. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low Density Residential and followed with a UR-7 zoning designation in 2002. Comprehensive Piangoning Analysis: The subject property is surrounded on three sides by Light Industrial property, with Low-Density Residential property to the north The requested Light Industrial designation is consistent with the surrounding designations. Recommendation: Change land use designation to Light Industrial and change zoning to 1-2. (See Attachment 4 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) CPA-03-05 Applicant: Dave Nerren (Lexington Hornes) Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and change zoning from UR-3.5 to UR-22. Location: Between Broadway and Cataldo Avenue, west of Pines Road. Site Areae 3 acres August 14,2003 Page 6 of 9 Staff Report 2303 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Existing Use: Largely vacant except for a single-family dwelling. Adjacent Uses: Residential/vacant land to the west, single-family residential to the north and east Public Facilities; The property has public sewer available; water is provided by Modem Electric Water Company. Access to the site is from Broadway Avenue, a four lane principal arterial. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The subject property has been zoned single-family residential for many years. Property directly east received a zone change to UR-22 in 1975 and is designated High Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The subject site is located within a transition area between single-family residential and office uses. Property directly east is designated High Density Residential while property to the west and north is designated Low Density Residential; property south, across Broadway, is designated Medium Density Residential and zoned UR-22, The request is consistent with Policies UL.2.16, UL.2.20 and Goal UL.7 of the Urban Land Use chapter of the Interim Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation: Change property to High Density Residential and change zoning to UR-22. (See Attachment 5 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related reaps.) CPA-03-06 Applicant: Harold Sarrf Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential_ Location: North side of Broadway, west of Evergreen Road between Blake and Manner Rd. Site Area: 5+ acres Existing Zoning!Land Use: The property is currently zoned UR-22 and is developed with a independent retirement complex called Broadway Court Estates, The Applicant is requesting to expand the facility to the east, into vacant residential property. Adjacent Uses: The site is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north — vacant lend zoned UR-3.5; south — Broadway Avenue, church and single family zoned UR- .5; east— single family residential zoned UR-3.5; and west— unimproved Blake Road and Blake elementary playfields zoned UR-3.5. August 14, 2003 Page 7 of 9 Staff Report 2oon Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Facilities: The site is currently served with water by Vera Water and Power and is connected to public sewer.. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The majority of the proposed site was zoned UR-22 in 1993 to allow for the development of the retirement facility. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low Density Residential but did riot change the UR-22 zoning. Therefore, the existing Comprehensive Plan designation is not consistent with the current zone and use of the property. The proposed expansion area to the east Is designated Low Density Residential and zoned UR-3.5. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: It appears that the County erred in designating the subject property Low Density Residential in 2001. The expansion area to the east would not have a significant impact on the neighborhood and is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy UL 2.17. Recommendation: Change the entire site to High Density Residential, including the separate parcel fronting Broadway and surrounded by the subject property. Apply the UR- 22 zone to the expansion area. (See Attachment 6 for application materials, SEA documentation and related maps.) CPA-03-07 Applicant: P &T Partners (John Peterson, Agent) Request: Change property from Low-Density Residential to High-Density Residential on the western portion and Community Commercial on the eastern portion. The requested zoning is UR-22 on the western portion and B-2 on the eastern portion, Location: The property is located on the west side of Barker Road, between Boone and Sharp Avenue. Site Area: Total area is about 3 acres, which will be split approximately in half by the Community Commercial/High Density Residential designations. Existing Use: The eastern portion is developed with a convenience store/service station and fast food restaurant. The western portion is vacant, Adjacent Uses: Property to the north is currently being developed into a R.V.}Boat storage facility; south is Washington State D.C.T. property (part of the 1-90/Barker interchange); east and west is residential. Public Facilities: Water is served by Consolidated Irrigation District#19; access is via public roads maintained by Spokane County. The existing convenience store/fast food restaurant is connected to the County's sewer line on Barker Rd. by a private 2n line. August 14, 2X Page 8 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendmerits Development of the western portion may require connection to the County's sewer line to the west, which is yet to be constructed. Kevin Cooke, Spokane County Utilities, informed the Community Development Staff that a line will be constructed about 1000` east of the Flora and Mission intersection, The developer of the subject property would be required to extend sewer to this location, rather than east to Barker Road. Engineering issues aside, future development on the site would be required to connect to the County's public sewer system. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The property was converted to 1-2 zoning in 1957, 1958 and 1971. The convenience store was constructed in 2000. In 2001, Spokane County designated the area Low-Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map and applied the UR-7 zone. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The existing use of the property is not consistent with the current Low-Density Residential designation and UR-7 zoning. The requested Community Commercial designation for the eastern portion of the site is consistent with the existing use. The Comprehensive Plan describes Community Commercial as 'areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods". Policy UL_2.15 encourages the location of medium and high density residential categories near commercial areas and public open spaces and on sites with good access to arterials_ Policy IJL.2.17 encourages multifamily homes to be integrated into or next to neighborhood, community or urban activity centers; and integrated into small, scattered parcels throughout existing residential areas. Recommendation: Community Development staff supports the requested Community Commercial designation for the existing commercial business on the eastern portion of the site. However, staff does not support designating the western portion High Density Residential, but does recommend designating the site Medium Density Residential, This will provide for a better transition between commercial and single-family residential and will have less impact on the existing single-family neighborhood, (See Attachment 7 for application materials, SEA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 9 of 9 01/ /U0 - FoK 4 (c-dvtliCr P ._ c . 01.4 _ PP' .{ - A . _ ll trio e k►Ja. . kL o- f+c.cidt? ieLls`c,. qG wr 1,-(Pilia � oz6:z3, roa . CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: v rr1 4 Address: F + ` r 1 ,ELgt Agenda Item: Q ftrA - 0 `± . . For Proposal Dpposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak - Yes _No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: 6 Address: I. + r_t Agernda Item: C, ~ 0 3 - 05 For proposal _Xcpposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak- Yes No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: -G' Address: ! G Agenda ltern. Q -`' t `( For Proposal r Ipposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak - yes CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 20D3 Name. Lir S ' - ' Address: 1 k fj . Ht 0,1. Agenda Item. t .1\6,(0 r 0 3 For Proposal j : I /Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak- Yes No V CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission Aust 28, 2003 Name: Y' 't Address: (* 10 jt' `'rt' f r Agenda Item: 'F' t. �}� For Proposal Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak- Yes _I* . • • " , 1 . ••••••=,',.„..Ni 1.. .,... '..\:-,-••• :.', . . '-‘"--.1H.: . . \, ..\\,:,\ 1 / a ` ► -... r\--k. .„ • -'\ . ,,..J , • . • . 'i,..--, • •e1/4-,\ ' \ k. F :• - 1 t x 1\-5 ' 04, , , s-4--- ...zy „.....,,. 2 in:-.... ,. , \-,..\ -,. . „...., •,.. . , . -, . :, _.,. .,,,,,,. '.,„\' ›.--.., . •.., . ._ y{1h \_• t . " C-F1 .1 0(2 '', 1 ,7 0 N . 1 . • ', � ) ..i *tib f --t--mK ..,. • pk n, __ , . f, 1.-,6 * 05-5 , .r..., ., ..... t . 0 i 4 _ ril f f i _____________,,,,...---''.7. L ....- •-q- -':'(95117--) 1 pii q i L .- ,,-e-r c_) (-4.,__, \\__ ' \_ //(::_ k„ r " ' / L.. ' 4L-V•i-i.C- L - .. } CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: Lot fv( Address: JO I D tL,1 .1616 Agenda Ram' h lP'.4 40. l 1- D.3-05 _ For Proposal Oppa.sed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak-_Yes No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission /� August 28, 2003 Name: A ,c l"J cs_if t" "'4? Address. I/8 43 g,'z-s Agenda Item: CPA 0 For Proposal} Apposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak-_Yes 1,./0 Lk, A/o. I/O ,3 C, +�;#,Ric,-,e-(-- jfFff f#}P fZ,6)/ rY2. /7/ Ol( - - z2.,, -a{ rt • q • • k . // . A, , ice, w_ : CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 8, 2003 /97Z/ZA,Veti Address: 'x/ Agenda Item: C — For Proposal Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak- Yes `No. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: J e~ (1 1t ViLy =1 / � - Address: Al t G 5 .0 t " r:r '(- f� Agenda Item: � C pA 'OS -- .r — For Proposal Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak-_Yes No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2D03 Name: /.. -+ 4�'C� l%f ' Address; Ai- �' ( T C r Agenda Item: t f C .. 2�') (±1.p - - For Proposal • fOpposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak _Yes No • CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission j f August 28,e6p3 Nam Address: L 7g AL T &7 /4 of) Agenda Item: fi) e;i — DS For Proposal Opposed to Proposal Neutrar Wish to Speak-_Yes X No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name. b r T J� Address: 3 C. / I4-724//0e.-:=7 - / � e— { 9/9 e73 Agenda Item: _ For Proposal Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak- Yes L--14e 6'27-7 ,77-6<-40 Ffilq -0 - 3 / Fe' ey 4 C f 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name; G iffier Address: I 0 / v'S ,t Agenda Kern; C.pp, - 05-63- For 5~For Proposal XOpposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak-_Yes No CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name. VAI at ir fil .ri dp' Address: f V? - Agenda Item: C -0 M C 5f For Proposal X Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak Yes No. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: 11/ L d" Address: 6 Agenda Item: P 6L- /Opposed For Proposal to Proposal Neutral • Wish to -Speak Yes P .— CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: t71ieirPr Address: / rrf'�-'' Agenda kern: 1#45-' Cr For Proposal • Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak-_YesNv PETITION Date: August 23, 2003 File Number: CPA-03-05 Address of Rezoning Request: Three Acre Parcel known as file number CPA-03-05 located west of Pines Road between Broadway and Cataldo, To: Spokane'Valley Planning Commission We, the undersigned owners of property affected by the requested zoning change described in the referenced file, do hereby protest against any change of the Land Development Code which would zone the property to any classification other than low density residential. We are against the proposed zoning change from low-density residential to high-density for the following reasons: ■ Increased traffic on Cataldo Ave, Perrine Road, and Boone Ave. through single-family residential streets_ Increased traffic is a safety issue not only for driving but the safety of our children as they walk to school, play in the their neighborhood and ride their bikes, • Increase in crime rate due to greater population in transitional housing units_ The existing apartments on Cataldo Ave have numerous police calls every month. These incidents include rape, burglary, vehicle prowling, domestic violence, harassment, theft, and persons with weapons among other charges. • Devaluation of current property values. The addition of high-density housing lowers the property values of single-family homes in the adjoining neighborhoods. Signature Printed Name Addrte-s j v / // 1 1. ,.. s fa/1W' k l k }a2r 7 4)/31 s r+ Lr rt eryor - LiVp.-44 /114 V.efeceLl r` fi ` i--li'A ? Atire/°/.1 /7 J c, f ,(1 r,; - offirip, L,bloc ALLY,N ion /J. kz Mfrir o f • 0 }• c L* I, L I —.— , 110 r IAS- A 5r. L / P0 (f� 1t, t 4. / of 1 Av f`7 40 Signature— Printed Name Address irionizint. — .., '3 6:1‘ ACC-7,-;.- • -r- irlWimeafinalIMIXDI O 41,211.111—.41111111111,10ra amirionw 4 - it MI_ .1. • / -,.-2.-- --r-L'A. ,i; , Pie s. - i .. 0 -- -_ :,..r.„--Az_ . . ,, s • - M3111.01KWArgriMPri _.. f .. 1.: .L.1. •- , t I ii � - . -. .- LW 0 MI 11 tIn kill.rs - ; V' I 7 6 7,7'-'F, . ',, , r Efi7 P. 5?i Er_;. ` t .- '- ---#. 118rdir-Ani411=11111,_ AWAPAMINEI . 4. JA /( a ! } AVP: -' - . A".4 — - 4 / f L` a Agr mit," 1 1111 LA_ . 'Q mi --- ` F�7 ! 1*i t J CEJ'9 ,O AIM AR L k- 43-12-,& . ,fog -- 0 A 6/ ', ' 4'/ ',e0 if 4 W. _ id 1- rdib- .4-61_,L.d - _ rri.,,,-/I AP eie I . /610_ 0 rin I 4' kalif I r ri a_,._.--, . - J/tt, A -:' /7 , ---- -,/^z. [yy' /i J} vs-e-•r rte]I6 '� r / -':-.47-4-- /,'"*'F1/-4/&- Mr' , rrL.:...6 Q./4 i-f'a. /3 r4,,al. d /', .i 74, R Cli .11 ,'' /. e • P7a e j,... . 0 •62 4 -.;. :ellIM • Ti ..d i t i ' )/' 1 .� i 7 R . i-) Mr.40MiiiffffeAlArlizAr '49 . to I . ...4%."1.:;0 Irci i i I el — A. • AMINIMBIMENKM/h Th L._. G_Mg.MANIMPFLAIllr- 71111MINIMEMAInnom• 7' P Signature printed Name Address i AIM ,_r Aka t j ( , ( id 1 f- f1 -•+'1 10- ' C 4 PETITION Date: August 23, 20103 File Number: CPA-03-05 Address of Rezoning Request: Three Acre Parcel known as file number CPA-03-05 located west of Pines Road between Broadway and Cataldo. To: Spokane Valley Planning Commission We, the undersigned owners of property affected by the requested zoning change described in the referenced file, do hereby protest against any change of the Land Development Code which would zone the property to any classification other than low density residential. We are against the proposed zoning change from low-density residential to high-density for the following reasons: • Increased traffic on Cataldo Ave, Perrine Road, and Boone Ave. through single-family residential streets. Increased traffic is a safety issue not only for driving but the safety of cur children as they walk to school, play in the their neighborhood and ride their bikes. - Increase in crime rate due to greater population in transitional housing units. The existing apartments on Cataldo Ave have numerous police calls every month. These incidents include rape, burglary, vehicle prowling, domestic violence, harassment, theft, and persons with weapons among other charges. • Devaluation of current property values. The addition of high-density housing lowers the property values of single-family homes in the adjoining neighborhoods. Signature Printed Name Address f ., I' I AY-e-4 1 £e C' CPI S hi e-V 1 A IM4 IMF 4 fill -1 4 `i C-' etor :v .r_a, I'L'V e.a e,, /4, . , /,,,,fa k-- ?Soo ,e) g---" 7+0.I (2 D k a f. , Ale f Co A7 re (/ _ iRR', r 7k-)._. ,, ,-( lix_ft • i le).aQ. 'E--_:rook.,) . L )11 si„. , fi _ avt .mayi . Cifc- (60E e-, `g,65,57L_N, „_ .........3. ,),_)6'zi,___,--.--.7....9___e_...„____.„.__t__, .... ti_57,5 l.::""f _.,..._7.,,_,,,_ fieL L____ � I � - f . i tOLA A izt,; r .t I I i }i (c.c."'----- Signature Printed Name Address r�FIE - r 114 /-/LeeA)J `b 3/20/2003 3:27 FM FRIM: Fax Spo:abe county Sheriff's uepa;tment Tu: 9.9212417 FAST: CO2 VF 003 Entries for I211.1 E Cataldo DATE TYPE OI'CALL DISPOSITION CODE LEGEND FOR CODES 2/03 THEFT 15A 15A=CRIME CHECK REPORT 2/03 PROTECTION ORDER SERVED 3/00 ARGUMENT lA 9/02 DV 1 A IA= DEPUTY REPORT 5/03 TRES SPASSER lE 1/0I VEHICLE PROWILING 15.E 5/03 SUICADAL lA I E_ARREST 5/24 SUICIDAL 1A 12/96 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ]B 12/96 THREAT 15A iG=WARRANT ARREST 11/97 THEFT 15A 12/97 THEFT 15A 10/02 RAPE I5A 12/95 WELFARE CHECK 1 A 12/00 THEFT 15A 1/01 THEFT 15A 5/96 WARRANT 1 A 10/96 HARRAS SING PERSON 15A 3/02 THEFT ISA 7/02 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE lE 7/99 SUICIDAL I A 9/99 SUICIDAL 1A 12/99 WARRANT 1E 2/00 OVERDOSE 1A 10/00 BURGLARY lA 10100 BURGLARY lA 9/99 RAPE lE 10/99 THREAT 15A 6096 ACCIDENT HIT&RUN lA 5/97 MALICIOUS beSCHIEF 15A 7/00 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1E 9/00 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1A 9/00 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1A 6099 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 15A 01/02 VEHICLE PROWLING 15A 9/96 ORDER OF PROTECTION 15A 4/99 THREAT 15A 1/00 11ARAS SM NT 15A 2/00 CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE 15A 3100 CUSTOD LAL INTERFERENCE 15A 6100 WELFARE CHECK lA 4/02 VEHICLE PROWLING 15A S/02 SUICIDAL lA 8103 TRES SPAS SIM 15A 8100 SEX CRIME 1 A 10100 JUVENILE RUNAWAY 15A 5/99 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE lE 4/00 BURGLARY 1 A 4/03 JUVENILE RUNAWAY 1 A 9/99 RAPE 1A 1101 D 'lLSTIC VIOLENCE 1A 12102 WELFARE CHECK 1 A 12/02 ABUSE CALL 15A 8/24/2003 3.27 FM MOM: Fz c Spokane County Streriff•s Department TO: 9.9212.117 PAGE: coca OF 003 3/03 I OIvIESTIC VIOLENCE IA 1/98 BURGLARY lE 6/00 i .SP waa, tE 121998 SUICIDAL 1A 1/99 FORGERY I5A 2/(X) BURGLARY 1 A 4/00 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1 G 9101 THREAT 15A 7/03 THEFT 15A 3197 ABDUCTION I A 12199 VEHICLE PROWLING 15A 6/97 STABBING IA 6/00 FORGERY 15A 4101 TRESSPASSING 10 4/97 VEHICLE THEFT IA 4/00 THEFT 15A 10/00 BURGLARY I A 1/01 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 8/96 SEX CRIME I A €/97 RAPE I A 4/96 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 7/96 PROTECTION ORDER 15A 8129 THREAT 15A 5196 Iva SIN C-ADULT 1SA 9/96 PROTECTION ORDER 15A 12/95 FORGERY 15A 4/97 THEFT 15A 7/97 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IA 9/97 JUVENILE RUNAWAY 15A 10/97 IvLISCIOUS MISCHIEF 15A 1/98 THEFT 15A 1/98 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 15A 3/93 PERSON W1TIi WEAPON IA 5/98 DISORDERLY PERSON 1G 3199 MALISCIOUS MISCHIEF 15A 9/99 INTIMIDATION WITH WEAN15A 99/99 BURGLARY 1A 1/00 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE I A 10/00 DRUGS IE 12100 THEFT 15A 10/00 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 4+01 LOST PERSON 15A 4+01 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 15A 4(02 THEFT 15A 4(02 THEFT 15A 6/02 DISORDERLY PERSON 1E 8/02 BURGLARY 15A 3/03 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 1A 4/03 DRUGS 15A 7/03 SUSPICIOUS PERSON 6/98 CIVIL PAPERS 1 A 2100 WARRANT 1 3/00 WARRANT 1G 1I/98 CIVIL PAPERS 1A 7/98 CIVIL PAPERS IA 9/00 PERSON WITH WEAPON lB 4/02 FOUND BICYCLE IA e8/11/20$3 eel: 52 50992110@8 CITYCFSPDKANVC+_ RAGE A$ PART HI Continued COMPREHENSIVE' PLAN CONSISTENCY Describe how the proposal is consistent w it hi the comprehensive plan-Cite specific Goals and Policies: LIL.2.16 Encourage the location of medium and high-density residential categories near commercial area; and public open spaces and on sites with good access to major arterials_ The subject property is located on Broadway Avenue near Pines Rd. which,places the site near commercial uses and on an arterial UL.2.20 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets acid blocks to Allow people to get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus or car_ .... The subject site can and will be designed to folic advantage of arterial access as well as local access street access, thus providing ease of ffcCess for both pedestrians, cyclist and motorist. 1.1L.7 Guide efficient development patterns by locating residential development in areas where facilities and services can be provided in 2 cost-effective and timely fnrshion. The subject site is located within Orr area of full services and it is thus cost effective to allow higher intensity development along this arterial in close proximity to other commercial.coolie$. Public Facilities Describe availability of public services, including roads, water, sewer, parks and Public Transit_ Tire subject site is served with full se, ices Dail a recently widened and itnproved arterial_ It is served by public transit on Broadway Avenue, Parks are located across .I Broadway at Pirres Junior high_ r i '4 � r-' ...J ei i. ', {' , 4 r 1 Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map .11111 — - ' ,will 1 — I lallill lip /II, . , , . mom i , Site y 1111 in 0 . :. -----:" 1 rti---- _il___T_____ IN - L... ' L-, N. LJE: ii ____________ \ - --� ir_i__ i .�_ 1 1 Comp Plan Category } —. Low Density Residential ,1-____________-- -- `� Medium Density Residential — __..^�. ll 1 MI High Density Residential j I ----1 [ Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial i Regional Commercial _T__,_ I Mixed Use 1111 Community Center MI Urban Activity Center Light Industrial ___-_ __.— L - Heavy Industrial ,:u .._.—�.�.� i Mineral Land 1MIMI 11 r-1 — - August fa,2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment =arin 400 CPA-03-05 %lle I !Feet . Zoning Map L__ L L _ _ .. L i _ A_ . -1 . F . v _____ 1 1 1 - i _ � 1 ' . I_ . .ilili.- i - ' _ rer-400 ., ill . .. . 1t-4. mi 'lli ' / •,..:! + 7-7--- 1.111 r— _ l A -1 . . I � ., 1 y 1 ____, ______, Zoning Class - E = UR-3.5 I UR-7 UR-12 • EN UR-22 1 [ B-1 I B-2 t —1 fig id 1-2 lelAwai"- -1----1 __.- _, uut 15 2003 Comprehensive Plan AmendmentmY , 40 CPA-03-05 SpokaMilley f Feet P/1" -c7 - 0 5— FILE NO. Cityof Spokane ValleyApplication for sosMilley Comprehensive Plan Amendment PART I APPLICANT NAME: Lexington Homes % Dave Nerren . PHONE: 9 ADDRESS: 12113 East BroadwayAvenueger E: iV I-- 0 EMAIL: ,--- CITY/STATE/ZIP: Spokane Valley, WA. 9.9206 FAX: JUN 3 4 gin PROPERTY OWNER 1 (IF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT) _N,AME: PHONE: ,it° Spokane tie ADDRESS: EMAIL, • CJTYSTATEIZIP: FAX: PROPERTY OWNER 2(1F MORE THAN TWO PROPERTY OWNERS,ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET) NAME: PHONE: ADDRESS; EMAIL: CITY/STATE/ZIP: ; FAx: AGENT/CONSULTANT/ATTORNEY NAME: CL 5tes % Dwight Hume ' PHONE: }I 58-6 84 0 995.--0.4V r", ADDRESS: ---,... ... 7 �. ,....., EMAIL: � c17aIem CNTY/STATEIZIP Spoka e,. WA - 84- ?f,:. / I'Ax: 9/0/ Alf ,V4 ijiezA-fr4st-fte• LAND USE MAP CHANGE PROPOSAL: ! CURRENT DESIGNATION PROPOSED DESIGNATION • LAND USE MAP I LDR PPR ZONING MAP i U1 -3.5 uR-22 COMPREHENSIVE PLANPOLICY CHANGE PROPOSAL(ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY): 2to f CURRENT POLICY N/A PROPOSED 1tiT/A POLICY i OFFICE USE ONLY: -- 0 City InitiatedI izen Initiated Concurrency Review Required: 0 Yes LI No Date Received: Received By: s4c ctriqi______ 61412003 Page 1 of 5 P TH LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner) / I, / 2J (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: i I . i// PHONE: 52- — , ' ' /� Azif ZIP: 7 120E5 (Cid) (ate) igneture) (Date) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) as. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ` day of )\--)-dl-St- , 20 7) I k it llt I d1W � NOTARY SEAL fi _ + 42 41,N B i ITA1 SIGNATURE fte ?'Q'g3�°"'# ' Notary Public in and for the State of Washington 40.01ARI,+ Residing at: s .. pu$lAG Q1, m ,•?'�. .•,���� My appointment expires: C� *� vOfl i s10,\� 6/4d2003 Page 2 of PART 11:1 SITE DATA (SEE ArrACEED) PROJECT/PRCIPOSAL SITE AREA(ACRES OR SQ.FT.) ADJACENT ARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED(ACRES OR SFr.) EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: SCHOOL DISTRICT.: • FRE Dr STR i CT: . . . . WATER DISTRICT: , NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION: _ _ _ PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY: WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING PUBLIC/PRIVATE ROAD: . . _ . ACCESS TO EXISTING OR PLANNED ARTERIAL?DIN) . . . . NAME OF ARTERIAL ROADS: PREVIOUS ZONING/LAND USE DECISION LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROFERT (SEE ATTACHED) CHANGED CONDITIONS WHAT ARE THE GRANGES CONDITIONS WHICH WARRANTS THIS PROPOSED CHANGE? (SEE ATTACHED) • • • 614/2003 Page 3 of 5 PROPOSAL PROVIDE GENEPAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: (SEE ATTACHED) ADJACENT LAND USES DESCRIBE EXISTING LAND USES WJTH1N THE VICINITY OF PROPOSAL: 1 (SEE ATTACH) 614/2003 Page 4 of 6 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY DESCRIBE HON PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN—CITES SPECIFIC GOALSIPOLICIES: (SEE ATTACHED) PUBLIC FACILITIES _ _ _ DESCRIBE AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES, JNCLUDIMIG, ROADS,WATER,SEWER, PARKS,AND [ PUBLIC TRANSIT: (SEE ATTACHED) 6/4/2003 Page 5 of 5 PART III SITE DATA PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA(ACRES OR SQ.FT.) J3O,7$3 SF. (3.00 ACRES) ADJACENT AREA OWNED OR CONTROLLED(ACRES OR Sq.Ft.) None EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: Slagle-family and vacant SCHOOL DISTRICT: CVSD#356 FIRE DISTRICT: FD#.F WATER DISTRICT: Modern Electric and Water Co. NEIGHBORHOOD AS S OCIA TETION_ Not Assigned PUBLIIC OR PRIVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY: Broadway(S), Cataaldv (1Y9 WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTAGE ON PUBLICPPRIVATE RI): I69.98'(Broadway)296.96' (Cataido) ACCESS TO EXISTING ARETERIALS? Yes NAME OF ARTERIAL ROADS:BroadwayAwenue PREVIOUS ZONING/LAND USE DECISIONS None by City of Spokane Valley Previous actions by Spokane County include: CofE's far BLI Change from Urban Category offormer Land Use Plan to LDR of GMA Plan. The Urban Category allowed for UR-22 Zoning, hence the previous zone changes in the area to UR-22. The current GMA Plan class tried the land on the basis of then current use tfrras limiting the property zone to UR 3.5 or UR 7. CHANGED CONNDITIONS What are the changed conditions which warrants this proposed change? • Other properties adjacent to the east and south have similar high-density UR-22 zoning as proposed for the subject property and supporting HDR or MDR land use categories. • The land use pattern is changing in the immediate area to office parks and/or other higher density residential uses. • Adequate infrastructure exist to serve the proposed itstensify of use, including the arterial improvements of Broadway Avenue. PROPOSAL Provide a general description of the proposal The subject property is being developed for an office park and possible assisted living units. The HDR Category would allow UR-22 zoning similar to the adjacent UR-22 zones and thus allow the proposed use. ADJACENT LANA USES Describe existing land uses within the vicinity of the proposal. There are a mixture of land uses within the area. To the east along Broadway, there are offices with some vacant parcels with residential single-family in transition to other UR-22 uses. To the south, there are apartments and a Junior High School and residential single-family exist to the north and west. The present use of the existing site is residential and vacant. PART III Continued COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY Describe how the proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan-Cite specific Goals and Policies: UL.2J6 Encourage the location of medium and high-density residential categories near commercial areas and public open spaces and on sites with good access to major arterials. The subject property is located on Broadway Avenue near Pines Rd. which,places the site near commercial uses and on an arterial. UL.2.20 Encourage new developments, including multifamily projects, to be arranged in a pattern of connecting streets and blocks to allow people to get around easily by foot, bicycle, bus or car. .... The subject site can and wilt be designed to take advantage of arterial access as well as focal access street access, thus providing ease of access for both pedestrians, cyclist and motorist. UL.7 Guide efficient development patterns by locating residential development in areas where facilities and services can be provided in a cost-effective and timely fashion. The subject site is located within an area offidi idi services and it is thus cost effective to allow higher intensity development along this arterial in closepr-oximity to other commercial services. Public Facilities Describe availability of public services, including roads, water, sewer, parks and Public Transit. The subject site is served with full services and a recently widened and improved arterial. It is served by public transit on Broadway Avenue. Parks are located across Broadway at Pines Junior High. f4�IMS okaine �e-�. .,1 *11 Department of CommuniDevefepment 4F Valley LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION DATE; August 6, 2003 FILE #: CPA-03-05 APPLICANT; Dwight Hume (agent), Lexington Homes %Dave Nerren (owner) LOCATION: The subject property is located between Broadway and Cataldo Avenue, west of Pines Road, Spokane Valley, WA REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential; corresponding zoning map amendment from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), to Urban Residential 22 (UR-22),. r rrh/r'tE'f`d'.P`J'j'/'.^drT1:'•/-•s`-.+Y.Nr.'.mt.'I- -'-,f.{`aid`-t+✓/`J�'4`.�-/i.°r_rFd-+.A'-:."..✓`✓`{ " - Background The subject property is located on the north side of Broadway Avenue, south side of Cataldo Avenue approximately G60 feet west of Pines Road in the NE 14 of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 East Whil. The subject property is comprised of approximately 3 acres and is predominantly vacant with a single family dwelling existing on a portion of the property. The site is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north — Cataldo Avenue and zoned UR-3.5; south — Broadway Avenue zoned UR-22; east — residential uses and zoned UR-22; arid west— residential uses and zoned UR-3.5. SEPA Analysis The requested comprehensive plan map and rezone is considered a "non-project" action under SEPA. The applicant does not include provisions for a specific project at this time. The requested rezone, if approved, would result in a wider range of land uses that would be allowed on the subject property. Given the wide range of potential uses, which include high density multi family residential and professional office that would be allowed under the requested UR-22 zoning, it would be extremely difficult to identify specific impacts associated with potential development of the subject property. A more appropriate time to assess the development impacts of this property would be at a future date when a project specific environmental review is conducted. 1 Recommendation Staff recommends that a Determination of Nonsignificance be issued for the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment. 2 CPA City of Spokane Valley DONATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal: Request a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and a rezone from Urban Residential 35,to Urban Residential 22. Proponent City of Spokane Valley Location of proposal, including street .address, if any: This action is considered a non-project action under RCW 43.210 and is located between Broadway and Cataldo Avenues,west of Pines Road in the IVB%of Section 16,Township 25 North,Range 44 21.41M.,Spokane Valley Washington, Lead agency City of Spokane Valley. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does nut have a probable significant adverse impact on the envaroxunent, An Environmental. Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 4321CA)30(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. [ ] There is no comment period for this DNS. [ ] This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in section 197-U-355 WAC. There is no further comment period on the DNS. This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2);the Iead agency will nota un this p:•p-ifor or 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by Al -t- Responsible official: Marina Sukup,AICA' Position/title: Director of Community Development Phone:(.509}921-1040 Address: 11707 Fast Sprague Avenue,Suite 1066 Spokane Valley,WA 99r4] Date e)a-c, ,;D3 Signature . - c You may appeal this determination to(name) Marina Stamp at(location) City Hall Iocated at 11707 East Sprague Avenue,Spokane Valley,WA no later than(date) 5:00 p.m. by(method) Written Statement of „peal You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Greg McCormick,AIC'to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. 1 Distribution List 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Department of Public Works,Gerry Gemrnill 3. Spokane Regional Health District;Steve Holderby 4. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement,Jeff Forty 5. Washington State Department of Transportation;Mark Rohwcr 6. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 7. Spokane County Fire Protection District No.8 8. Ca_rnhope irrigation District No. 7 9. Consolidated it ri.ga.tion.District No.19 10. hast Spokane Water District No. 1 11. Hutchinson Irrigation District No.16 12. Irvin Water District No. 6 13. Model Irrigation.District Na 18 14. Modern Electric Water Company 15. Spokane County Water District No.3 16. Trentwood Irrigation District No.3 17. Vera Irrigation District No.15 18. City Of Spokane,John Mercer 19. City of Liberty Lake, Doug Smith 20. City of lyiill oodr Heather Cannon 21. CentralValley School District, Dave Jarirmari 22 East Valley School District,12325 E Grace 23. West Valley School District,Dave Smith 2 -cik.ema i g:.e./.4.a. .0qt, 1 41-1.- E-•r "4, tt. f!:.-.- v.... e 7 ...z./ }�%i ;.. - I # P-c illi 2, :. i' a tea. 1• I �'` � j I ar,. .1 . yiA.,l lk , _.r ire, i,4.1,t . .-A: . Lei__ S e _ di.. '' y ., -: Li 7 t i 7.10 t 1. I � t'lvf-.�.-�Jh,.,� .,_12.;, :rA _ r _T .-___J . _..1 _; �-.P.,_,.. , - --� r ./ t I I 11 .JRA _•` _ -- A... _ t1' 3_ A - # - _Al _ , e ( , • fir rAO I ____=Aee4,__..i_ L.A jetL__ ,,tadloimiL.e.d.L.„.j_________ ,i; I r, • . , ... .• .,,,,,__,......._. ... A • a. of . . .4111.. ..!' Ari-.--. „_„.. .,_. I!! di:7'27-A-15r-412 _____41:5 .413a_i&___TA,_.e. ,_-,i______T.A 1,2":"..4dist --. -- • ' � „ . . I ' _ , t n aler- - I' e„,...9 / 10 , R �_e.-- ,,......-_ / 1 . 0---e__.,- yx, e �r *f {{ f �1 Jr:-!, arilibl-'4C-t_ is I., I � 11 EXCELLELICE IN °HAL HEALTH 4,7 /47- 0 3 r-Sea0-o-z._ ci- ,t7 - 3-0Al /44. - (La . '`" Lg--.-44 4-7 // 1lJT /4 !e/ / 67://4 LW6j f>LA (27 ,p4efry + -7 ,47 F T } ire + a !If Layne O. Hinckley 0.0.5. P.S. 17121 E. Broadway Building #4 Spokane, Washington 99206 P 589.926.6761 F 509.926.6262 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: Address: Agenda Item: 1 - - et,4, For Proposal Opposed to Proposal AOAIA Neutral 7 Wish to Speak- Yes No IJP ( .. f� F7';Ile- /116 C PM. 63 1r rJ Ill i44 'rlc - . Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map _______ ___,—.______------H 1,,_ _____-7.-____ i 1 11 1. it aI__L____t___ __i__ -, ,-„,, - .... - ry _ Lutak, ,______„____— ______ i ili ea 1 I ef/le0 _, am __] r II 1 0, ii/dir - . Site fri el 111111 ill il I 1 Intl!I11 1 /44 id imm In: H-- -moo. I_ ` t ti-- 5pnnbfiel• I I 1 11111 Comp Plan Category Alli 1 __�- - _i Low Density Residential I 111111} Medium Density --'. - 1 I__ li 1.11 High Density Residential r Neighborhood CommercialI I CommunityCommercialI l — - _ 1 1 Ilin Regional Commercial Mixed Use I _- ral ® Community Center —. 1 17 4 111 l 1111 Urban Activity Center Light Industrial 1 `" ::_i ( --- -- II_. - Heavy Industrial ) . . 1 Mineral Land — i �� � � �; ' Augugt 15,2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment *ln 400 CPA-03-06 .000.Valley I 1 Feet Zoning Map J___1_,H, ,, ims ilo ,. .. . , , y -..-dv-- r---=------- - imi,.., . -7--- 1 ' t , , ' 111111.1 _ IL ____,______ ,,„. „ ..OF 111 //// ' : rter,A ,,,,,,:f site , ., iii a 11111' ,,opyrdy MEI 1111111 f'. Al/ . / . 1 e. .://:// 4 n -77----- 1 - 1 -1--- 1 l - 1 Ad Zoning Class UR-3.5 u IL. - a UR-112 UR-22 B-1 r----7) 3-2 MI B-3 1 -___ 1-9 -- 1-2 1 - 1-3 = I , PC- -'1 August 15,2003 sloset - Comprehensive Pian Amendment ars 400 CPA-03-06 'Val .7' I !Feet CPA- FILE No. Slu pe City of Spokane Valley Application for 400•01,Talley Comprehensive Plan Amendment PART I APPLICANT _04.01_ ,,,4 y. 0 14 _ . ers.'_tA,1-4 _ __ ... _______________ _....„.. _ Iiiktr_E:- kl_gt ___ __ _6:calf:I.. .I 5:7;Par.11-4c,L.Peit,laii_ f'11°NE: S-G1,2_- 9-,?/- 4:3•Z ill JpR9RE-SS: /3.3- 6..5- t-- ,47,-.Q06.. .., EmAL: i IcITY/STATEIZIP: _,.,.$?0_44_t___Vailicri. 4_2,2 21e I FAX: _ç9 2 : S 1 PROPERTY OWNER -1 IF DIFFERENT FROM APPLICANT) NAME: Lir4g,„7,g7L scir-r--t -1- II- ADEIRESS: __q_i Li_r,._, —TPHONE:S6 9 • 2.ii.j.2_:„...k. ' EMAIL- eITY/STATE/ZIP: S ___Y2e*t_14 99„2:),6"-- -:FAx.: ----c-o— qmi_.-. j.eat — PROPERTY OWNER 2 OF MORE THAN TWO PROPERTY OWNERS.,ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET) - -- NMME--- I PHONE: ADDRESS: I EMAIL: CITY/STATE/ZIP: FAX: AGENT/CONSULTANT/ATTORNEY ___ FNAML.:_da S, r tp i pHoNE: 0-cic_e_iii-.04d ivet_)4 Pooki!-: Ce4iL____9_8_157-780 [ei-r7isTATEmp giti,,_vake), Aii4.„ 222.d. FAX: LAND USE mAp CHANGE PROPOSAL: Po,rs._c L,41,, 0 1 Cf, /V 4,2,-L cfcifki 412,6".. -1- 16-1.47,/qA y I - - CURRENT DESIGNATION 1 I PROPOSED DESIGNATION - AN 13-USE-MAP1 tot,,,.• epwk--1?-4-", Fri',t.,_:=L4-s V-et-dir,-,1M .4.- 1 ZONING IVIAP I U Vk -3, 5 — Col COMPREHENSIVE PLAN F'ollICY CHANGE PROPOSAL lATTACH SEPARATE SHEET IF NECESSARY El . tECEIVE CURREN '• ICY JUN 3 0 2003 PROPOSED ; City of Spokane Valey FOL? 1 i OFFICE USE ONLY: City Initiated El Citizen Initiated Concurrency Review Required: 0 Yes ip E No 1 Date Received: • -'3 0 - O 3 Received By: A ..i, lin 642003 Rage 1 of 6 PART II LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal ownerl I, 1- a c,,Ii G# 1(4 ,, Sc2. -1.3'P , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE 'ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING 1 Y ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF. ADDRESS: `({L/ Jw r, PHONE! } - ZIP; 99 Lie tP (City) 4. (stnte) (Signature) (Date) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss; COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this /. day of , 2067,3 I `,,, . NO RN' SIGNATURE ►~ V Notary Public in and for the State of Washington Raja. Residing at: f.7 f/ ee f'rQr,.�,,v4111x` . �� My appointment expires: 0 � 1 "�� 614/2003 Page 2 of 5 PART Il SITE DATA . .__._,-__ _ __-- - _ ._ —__......-._._,.. PROJECTIPROPOSALSITE AREA(ACRES ORSQYFT) T I 1+ Acres--_ __,,.., AD CENT ARE OWNED OR CONTROLLED(AcRES DR SO.FT.) I 4+ AC res a E=XISTING USE OF PROPERTY: 3 t r=-- _-_.._ ._ i]R- - _-.__ _--- _1..._ _ I SCHOOL DISTRICT. _ Central Valley FIRE DISTRICT _sr-- T--� �� w.W- - - - -- VVATER DISTRICT: 1 r - __ - �_I vera NEIGHBORHOOD ASSoCIATIoN: !PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY: MYTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING PUBLIC/PRIVATE ROAD: 1110_. ACCESS TO EXISTING OR PLANNED ARTERIAL? JN �__-- IAM E i F AR ERIAL R 4CS: _ B.r o a dua-y--- .. PREvious ZDIIINGLAND USE DECISION LST PREVIOUS PLANNING ACTICNS INVOLVING THIS PRoi3ERTY: _ ----- F e zone Application on 5--30-43 . ITI0NS - - WHP.T ARE THE CHANGES CONDITIONS WHICH WARRANTS THIS PROPOSED CHANGE? 7 I Broadway Court Estates was built on adjacent property V to the West of these properties and is zoned UR-22 . 1 Broadway Court Estates is a Independent Retirement Apartment complex for Seniors. 6/4/2003 Page 3 of 5 PROPOSAL PROVIDE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL, — --- 1 Broadway Court Estates ?base II This property will allow for construction of additional Retirement Aparttneft Homes to the existing Broadway Court Estates Building. The current Single Family Home fronting Mamer will remain and the ILots will be adjusted to over 10,0100 sq.ft.. as required by the [TR 3 . 5 codes . ADJACENT LAND USES _� ---�.� -Y- — --- --- s DESCRIBE EXISTING LAM) USES WITHIN THE V1C1NITY OF PROPOSAL: 1UProperty to the West of these properties and adjacent to is zoned R-22 also prolDerty less than .5 miles South fronting Mamer Rd. is zoned UR-22 . 6/412003 'Page d of 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY DESCRIBE Hove PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN-CITE SPECIFIC GOALS/POLICIES: The site meets the Urban Land use category for High Density Residential . Design standards will meet the current character and design of the Broadway Court Estates Building. Under UL 2 . 15 the site meets the High Density Residential Category with good access to major arterials . Under UL 2 . 17 the current building ti serves as a community center for Spokane Community College Senior' Water Aerobics Program and a T. 0.P.S. Program for Seniors . Also Multifamily homes are to he intergrated throughout existing residential areas that supports transit . PUBLIC FACILITIES IJESCRIBE AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES, INCLUDING, ROADS,WATER,SEWWER, PARKS,AND I PUBLIC TRANSM I , The szte 13505 E. Broadway is located within a area that currently offers public sewer aid water, schools , arterials, public transit ) and fire services . _ I I I 6/412003 Page of 5 City of Spokane Valley -Division ofBuil din+u and Planning 11707 E. Sprague Ave. Spokane, WA 99206 t'cmtion: Micki Har ois Regarding: Broadway Court Estates Rezone Application Phase IL Dour !1licM.3: The undersigned owners of the property located at 921 N. Varner Road, in the City of the Spokane Valley, Washington (also described as parcel number 45151i 422) authorizes Harold Sarff to file an application for approval nf a rezone incorporating said real property, described as West 67.0 Feet. Robert Light_fo'CV i t t 4 921 N. Manter Rd. 921 N. ]airier Rd_ City of Spokane Vallee. WA 992]6 City of Spokane Valley, WA 99216 Phone: (509) 926-0645 Phone: (509) 926-0645 , /:1)41CN; Date Date t cit X11�'UF 3pohane Department of Community Development ValleY LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION DATE: August 6, 2003 FILE #: CPA-03-06 APPLICANT:Harold Serif LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of Broadway Avenue, between Blake and Mamer Roads, Spokane Valley, WA REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential; corresponding zoning map amendment on the eastern portion of the site from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), to Urban Residential 22 (UR-22), the western portion of the site is currently zoned UR-22, Background The subject property is located on the north side of Broadway Avenue, between Blake and Maurer Roads in the NE 1/ of Section 15, Township 25 North, Range 44 East VVM. The subject property is comprised of approximately 5+ acres and is developed with Broadway Court Estates, which is an independent retirement complex fur senior, on the western portion of the subject property. The easterly portion of the subject property is currently vacant; the applicant proposes to expand the existing use into this area if the comprehensive plan and zoning maps requests are approved. The zoning map and comprehensive plan map are in conflict relative to the western portion of the subject property. The comprehensive plan map designates this area of the property as Low Density Residential, while the western portion is zoned UR-22. The requested change would correct this inconsistency. The site is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north — vacant land zoned UR-3,5; south — Broadway Avenue, church and single family zoned UR-3,5; east — single family residential zoned UR-3.5; and west — unimproved Blake Road and Blake Elementary playfields zoned UR-3.5. SEPA Analysis t The requested comprehensive plan map and rezone is considered a "non-project" action under SEPA. Part of this request will result in the comprehensive plan map and zoning map to be consistent. The applicant does not include provisions for the expansion of the existing facility at this time. The requested rezone, if approved, would presumably result in an expansion of the existing use on the westerly portion of the subject property. A more appropriate time to assess the development impacts of this property would be at a future date when a project specific environmental review is conducted_ Recommendation Staff recommends that a Determination of Nonsignificance be issued for the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment. 2 p7A-tteo(t" City of Spokane Valley DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE Description of proposal. Request a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and a rezone from Urban Residential 3.5, to Urban Residential 77 Proponent Cita of Spokane Valley Location of proposal, including street address, if any: This action is considered a non-project action wider RCW 43.210 and is located on the north side of Broadway Avenue, between Mauler and Blake Roads in the ATE tla of Section 15.Township 2.5 North,Rang-e 44_EW is Spokane Valley Washington. Lead agency: City of Spokane Valley. The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.U3O(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request. ] There is no comment period for this DNS. [ ] This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in section 797-11-355 WAC. There is no further comment period on the DNS. 96/This 171 4' 2);is issued under 197-11-3the lead agency will not ac,tn this pr jIas. +r 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by AN . Responsible official: Marina Sakuo.AlCP Position/title: Director Developrntent Phone:/509)921-1000 Address: 11707 East Spra ,e Avernie,Suite 106;Spokane Valley,WA 90.06 Date Signature - - You may appeal this determination to(name) Marina Sukup at(location) City Hall located at 11707 East Sprague Avenue,Spokane Valley,WA no later than(date) 5;0U pan. by(method) Written Statement of Appcal You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Greg McCormick,, ICP to read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals. 1 Distribution List 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Department of Public Works,Gerry Gemcau11 3. Spokane Regional Health District;Steve Holderby 4. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement,Jeff Foriy 5. Washington State Department of Transportation.;briark Rohwer 6. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1 7. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 8 8. Carnhope Irrigation District No. 7 9. Consolidated Irrigation District No. 19 10. East Spokane Water District Na. 1 11. Hutchinson Irrigation District No. 16 12. Irvin Water District No.6 13. Model Irrigation District No. 18 14. Modern Electric Water Company 15. Spokane County Water District No. 3 1&. Trentwood Irrigation District No.3 17. Vera Irrigation District No. 15 18_ City Of Spokane,John Mercer City of Liberty Lake,Doug Smith 20. City of Millwood,Heather Cannon 21. Central Valley School District, Dave Jack 22. East Valley School District, 12325 E. Grace 23. West Valley School District,Dave Smith 2 ,.,k-0‘.1: It-Z:,q- 056 Vicinity Map 1 i MON verzAdjormi Malion 11 1 Mr". all . lk 1 Site _ rAsr , OM ' 4./1 I rolfr d:4 t al rill Fr' A di Row ___,___,—, , 1 HII 1 , A .1 . 1 \ ... , __, 1.1 El -HI il 1 ---1 . . .,,v. _ 1 . ' 1 \ 111ua1 1 ii .---r-:---„ . E . 1 .,. . ime . I . ;.,.. — ; 1 0 . i 7 'WMIIMM -- August 15,20{73 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ti( k 40CFA-03-06 .0000.Wpi �� poet Sjcine i ' - Department of om nunit r Development LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION ...oval. Miiiey Staff Report Subject: 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Staff: Greg McCormick, AICP -- Long Range Planning Manager Scott Kuh#a, AICP — Long Range Planner Marina Sukup, AICD — Community Development Director Background The Spokane Valley interim Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from July 2nd to July 1'1 of the following year_ Applications received prior to July .l't are considered by the Planning Commission in August and September, with a recommendation forwarded to the City Council in later September or early October. A decision by the City Council is to be made no later than December of each year. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received 7 requests for site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendments for 2003. Sites that are approved for a comprehensive plan amendment will automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation. Attachments to this report include application materials, SEPA documentation, land use maps and zoning maps to assist the Commission's review. Notice The Community Development Department placed advertisements in the Spokesrnan- Review on June 5, 7, 12 and 14, 2003, notifying the public that comprehensive plan amendment applications would be accepted until July 1, 2003. On August 13, 2003, notice Staff Report 2003 Cornprehen ive Plan Amendments of the Planning Commission's public hearing was placed in the Spokesman-Review. Each site was posted with a "Notice of Land Use Application" sign, which included a map and description of the proposal. Finally, individual notice of the proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each amendment. SEPA Review Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA — RCW 43.21 C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment Under SEPA, amendments to the comprehensive plan are considered "non-project actions" which are defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the actual development of the subject properties. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Nonsignificance (DNS) were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on August 2003. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on August 13, 2003 consistent with City of Spokane Valley requirements. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals CPA-03-01 Applicant: Gib Brumback Request: Change the land use designation from Low-Density Residential to Regional Commercial and the zoning from UR-7 (UR-7) to (8-3), Location: 6915 East Montgomery -West of Argonne Rd., on the north side of Montgomery and south of the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way. Site Area: 2.76 acres Existing Use: 15,000 sq. ft. self-storage building, self serve car wash and RV/truck storage. Adjacent Uses: Railroad to the north, commercial to the west, residential to the south. Public Facilities: The property is currently served with public water and sewer and is accessed from a paved, public street_ Previous Land Use(Zoning: The subject property was zoned commercial in 1970. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low-Density Residential and applied the August 14, 2003 Page 2 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments UR-7 zone. The request is to re-establish the previous commercial zoning and be consistent with existing uses on subject property. Comprehensive Pian!Zorring Analysis: The interim Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the Argonne corridor between 1-90 and Trent Ave. as a Community Center, which is a higher-intensity, mixed-use area designed to serve two or more neighborhoods, These areas have a mix of uses, including commercial, civic, high-density residential and recreational uses. Existing zoning along the Argonne corridor is largely B-3 and UR-22 transitioning to UR- 3.5. The Applicant requests that the Regional Commercial land use designation be applied to the subject property_ This designation is not consistent with the adjacent Community Center designation. Recommendation Change property to Community Center, consistent with adjacent properties. Apply the B•2 zone consistent with the Phase 1 Development Regulations. All current uses on the property are allowed in the B-2 zone. (See Attachment 1 for application materials, SFPA documentation and related maps.) CPA-03-02 Applicant: Associated Restaurants, Inc. (Richard Repp) Request: Change lard use designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Regional Commercial and zoning from B-1 to 8-3. The application indicates that the property is designated Medium Density residential, which is not correct. Location: South side of Appleway Blvd. across from Dishman Dodge, east of Park Road. Site Area: 3 acres Existing Use: The property is currently vacant. Adjacent Uses: The Rose Haven lvlobile Home Park is located directly west of the subject property, with vacant hillside land to the south and east. Dishman Dodge is located across Appleway to the north. Public Facilities: The subject property is located within East Spokane Water District# 1 (WATER RIGHTS?? The area was sewered by Spokane County in 2001 and is accessed by Appleway Blvd. Previous Land Use/Zoning: In December, 2001, the property was zoned Neighborhood Commercial (B-1) by Spokane County. The Applicant originally requested the County to August 14, 2003 Page 3 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments zone the properly B-3, which was conditionally approved by the Hearing Examiner. This decision was appealed to be Board of County Commissioners, who decided to zone the property B-I in December, 2001. The major issue concerning this property is the potential impact commercial development will have on the Dishrnan Hills Natural Area, located south of the site and the precedent that would be set by allowing commercial development south of Appleway. Spokane County adopted their Comprehensive Plan in November, 2001 and Phase 1 Development Regulations implementing the Comprehensive Plan in January, 2002. The 2001 Comprehensive Plan designated the subject property Medium Density Residential with the Phase 1 Regulations applying the UR-12 zoning designation. The zoning history of the subject property was brought to the City Council's attention prior to the date of incorporation. When the Council adopted the County's Comprehensive Plan, the subject property received the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation. This was followed with a zone change to Neighborhood Commercial, consistent with the decision made by the County Commissioners in December, 2001. Comprehensive PlantZoning Analysis: The entire south side of Appleway Blvd., from Coleman to Sargent Ave., is designated Medium{ Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan map, except for the subject property, which is currently designated Neighborhood Commercial. Property north of Appieway is designated Medium Density Residential and Regional Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Regional Commercial category as intensive commercial areas intended to draw customers from the County at large and other outlying areas, Regional shopping centers and major commercial areas will be designated with this classification. The Neighborhood Commercial classification designates small-scale neighborhood-serving retail and office use. Community Commercial designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Recommendation: The proposed site is bound by a manufactured home park to the west and hills to the south and east. These constraints, and the size of the subject property, will limit development in this area to the subject site. The Neighborhood Commercial designation does not appear appropriate in this instance because the site will not serve a single neighborhood. Further, at 3 acres, the site is large enough to support commercial businesses that will not fit into the Neighborhood Commercial classification, either by size or intensity. Conversely, the Regional Commercial designation is perhaps too intense for this particular site. Staff recommends designating the property Community Commercial and applying the B-2 zone, which will allow more flexibility and marketability to the site, but will limit future impacts of development that would be allowed under the Regional Commercial designation and B-3 zone. (See Attachment 2 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 4 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-03-D3 Applicant: Thomas Smith Request Change the land use designation from High Density Residential to Light Industrial and change zoning from UR-22 to 1-2, Location: West side of Pines Road between the Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way and Mansfield Avenue. Site Area: 2.5 acres Existing Use: Vacant Adjacent Uses: Property to the west, across Pines Rd., includes a restaurant, an office and a convenience stare. A mobile home court is directly west of the site and the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way adjacent to the south property line. Public Facilities: Public water is available to the site through Irvin Water District. The area is scheduled for sewer construction during 2003; however, the Applicant recently opted out of the County's sewer program. The County would have provided a sewer stub to the property from the sewer extension along Mansfield Avenue and charged the property with a sewer general facility. The Applicant decided to opt out of the program, indicating that he would be responsible to extend a sewer line under the railroad right-of- way to an existing main line. In either case, any new development would be required to connect to the public sewer system. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The property was zoned Restricted industrial in 1976, which would have allowed construction of a commerciallindustrial development_ In 2001, Spokane County designated the property High Density Residential and followed with a UR-- 22 zoning designation in 2002. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The Interim Comprehensive Plan designates a large area west of Pines and north of the railroad right-of-way High Density Residential. This category allows for multi-family apartments and office uses. Land on the east side of Pines is designated Community Center, an intense mixed-use area. Property to the south, including the railroad property, is designated Light Industrial The Comprehensive Plan states that Light Industrial category Llis intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility". Office and commercial uses that support and compliment the industrial areas are allowed. Recommendation: Change property to Light Industrial and zone 1-2, consistent with previous 1976 zoning and policies within the Interim Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 3 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 5 ci 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-03-04 Applicant: Doug Lydig (John Sweitzer, Agent) Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial and zoning from UR-7 to 1-2. Location: Golf Dome property at Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and adjacent to Beauty Bark. Site Area: 2.57 acres Existing Use: Indoor golf practice facility. Adjacent Uses: Industrial and commercial uses, including a landscape supply business to the east, a UPS trucking facility to the west and scattered residential parcels to the north. Public Facilities: Public sewer won't be available to the site until 2005. Public water is supplied by Spokane County Water District No. 3_ The site is accessed by a public road. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The site was rezoned from k2 to B-3 by Spokane County in 1994 to allow for construction of the indoor golf facility and pro shop. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low Density Residential and followed with a UR-7 zoning designation in 2002. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The subject property is surrounded on three sides by Light Industrial property, with. Low-Density Residential property to the north. The requested Light Industrial designation is consistent with the surrounding designations. Recommendation: Change land use designation to Light Industrial and change zoning to 1-2. (See Attachment 4 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) CPA-in-DS Applicant: Dave Nerren (Lexington Homes) Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and change zoning from LIR-3.5 to UR-22. Location: Between Broadway and Cataldo Avenue, west of Pines Road. Site Area: 3 acres August 14, 2003 Page 6 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Existing Use: Largely vacant except for a single-family dwelling. Adjacent Uses: Residential/vacant land to the west, single-family residential to the north and east. Public Facilities: The property has public sewer available; water is provided by Modern Electric Water Company. Access to the site is from BrcadwayAvenue, a four lane principal arterial. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The subject property has been zoned single-family residential for many years. Property directly east received a zone change to UR-22 in 1978 and is designated High Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map. Comprehensive Plan,Zoning Analysis: The subject site is located within a transition area between single-family residential and office uses. Property directly east is designated High Density Residential while property to the west and north is designated Low Density Residential; property south, across Broadway, is designated Medium Density Residential and zoned UR-22. The request is consistent with Policies UL.2.16, UL.2.20 and Goal UL.7 of the Urban Land Use chapter of the Interim Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation: Change property to High Density Residential and change zoning to UR-22, (See Attachment 5 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) CPA-03-06 Applicant Harold Sarff Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. Location: North side of Broadway, west of Evergreen Read between Blake and !Varner Rd, Site Area: 5f acres Existing ZoninglLartd Use: The property is currently zoned UR-22 and is developed with a independent retirement complex called Broadway Court Estates, The Applicant is requesting to expand the facility to the east, into vacant residential property. Adjacent Uses: The site is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north — vacant land zoned UR-3.5; south 4 Broadway Avenue, church and single family zoned UR- 3.5; east— single family residential zoned UR-3.5; and west— unimproved Blake Road and Blake elementary playfields zoned UR-3.5, August 14, 2003 Page 7 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Facilities: The site is currently served with water by Vera Water and Power and is connected to pubtic sewer. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The majority of the proposed site was zoned UR-22 in 1998 to allow for the development of the retirement facility. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low Density Residential but did not change the UR-22 zoning. Therefore, the existing Comprehensive Plan designation is not consistent with the current zone and use of the property. The proposed expansion area to the east is designated Low Density Residential and zoned UR-3.5. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: It appears that the County erred in designating the subject property Low Density Residential in 2001. The expansion area to the east would not have a significant impact on the neighborhood and is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy UL 2.17. Recommendation: Change the entire site to High Density Residential, including the separate parcel fronting Broadway and surrounded by the subject property. Apply the UR- 22 zone to the expansion area. (see Attachment 6 for application materials, SEPA documentation arid related maps) CPA-03-07 Applicant: P &T Partners (John Peterson, Agent) Request: Change property from Low-Density Residential to High-Density Residential on the western portion and Community Commercial on the eastern portion. The requested zoning is UR-22 on the western portion and B-2 on the eastern portion. Location: The property is located on the west side of Barker Road, between Boone and Sharp Avenue. Site Area: Total area is about 3 acres, which will be split approximately in half by the Community Commercial/High Density Residential designations. Existing Use: The eastern portion is developed with a convenience store/service station and fast food restaurant. The western portion is vacant. Adjacent Uses: Property to the north is currently being developed into a R.VJBoat storage facility; south is Washington Stale D.O.T. property (part of the 1-90/Barker interchange); east and west is residential. Public Facilities: Water is served by Consolidated Irrigation District#19; access is via public roads maintained by Spokane County. The existing convenience store/fast food restaurant is connected to the Courity's sewer line on Barker Rd. by a private 2" line. August 14, 2003 Page 8 cf 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Development of the western portion may require connection to the County's sewer line to the west, which is yet to be constructed. Kevin Cooke, Spokane County Utilities, informed the Community Development Staff that a line will be constructed about 1 DO0' east of the Flora and Mission intersection. The developer of the subject property would be required to extend sewer to this location, rather than east to Barker Road. Engineering issues aside, future development on the site would be required to connect to the County's public sewer system. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The property was converted to 1-2 zoning in 1957, 1958 and 1971. The convenience store was constructed in 2000. in 2001, Spokane County designated the area Low-Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map and applied the UR-7 zone. Comprehensive PlantZoning Analysis: The existing use of the property is not consistent with the current Low-Density Residential designation and UR-7 zoning. The requested Community Commercial designation for the eastern portion of the site is consistent with the existing use. The Comprehensive Plan describes Community Commercial as "areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods". Policy UL.2.16 encourages the location of medium and high density residential categories near commercial areas and public open spaces and on sites with good access to arterials. Policy UL.2.17 encourages multifamily homes to be integrated into or next to neighborhood, community or urban activity centers; and integrated into small, scattered parcels throughout existing residential areas. Recommendation: Community Development staff supports the requested Community Commercial designation for the existing commercial business on the eastern portion of the site. However, staff does not support designating the western portion High Density Residential, but does recommend designating the site Medium Density Residential. This will provide for a better transition between commercial and single-family residential and will have less impact on the existing single-family neighborhood. (See Attachment 7 for application materials, SENA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 9 of 9 .:) pe„R ,\I 62x,„ k: L c_D _ Pei- O 3 61 7 elQI-6--e.4,.*„ rr ,,,,r.r4.,/ ,,, e Pizq 69 3 6,-- 7 0,.„.„.c., --. , R - - . ;.0 5- 4(---,40LL-7 ."/-_,„--7--r(4 cL)0.4---011_ LAt„../ OF:psec -1) 46) 46. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Planning Commission August 28, 2003 Name: 0. yP 0 � Address'f Agenda item: For Proposal Opposed to Proposal Neutral Wish to Speak-1.'4-Yes No /7 ,%'i/7 bzisKer Rd, gic:_- eilaciE2.5" 4/0, c:P,4 -03 -41 Artre2 Ve of /17 c' 6-Aakyc--' ' • , Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map — > -- -____, r -.- ---- ______--i--, ______--i--, Site I l'c \jil =„f______._ --s,___,___—__Frage Arairrir 4 .., ru, el, a Ji7 /1'. * e Boone Fill I p 190E293OIC_ I— F I II I I I 9C W293 OFF 190 I� Oh4 - _,____- - Comp PLan Category _- _-- LOW Density Residential --- Medium Density Residential -_ --- :`.1,;. High Density Residential \ - 1-- Neighborhood Commercial L Community Commercial _ Regional Commercial �..� Mixed Use . I Community Center ---- 4 N I Urban Activity Center Light Industrial Heavy Industrial M I Mineral Land � _________ , I--_ 1---- �»► cam. __ .rii _-. August 15, 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendmentr„w e 410 GPA-03-07 4000 Valley I l Feet Zoning Map 11111111111111 mil .0 Grfke sr s :::--- 1=70000,111-% IIMM....11° 11111M1 imimil6L.. up site3.1 paTa # faone PiI 90 E293 ON I /- • ISO sOPF 190 1 9[1 W'2���N IGO F SUR-7 UR-12 -i�^� tl UR-22 MI 1 II , ti M 1 Grove L.Tii i M _1 ill -... .. MZ IMP fir~ August 15, 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment ` alane 410 CPA-03-07 'Valley � I _ 1 Feet ❑i� - FILE NO. p0 ne C nn of Spokane Valley Application for 1/alIV ,1 Comprehel�lsIv Plan Amendme E : ,r.--._D .00 PART I JUL 1 1 2003 APPLICANT -j- � pa I NAME: P&T PARTNERS^�A WASHINGTON G'E=NEFLPk1p.PAF�7TMERs-IIP - HoNE:_1(5 . ?4- 23 s ADDRESS: 8412 E. SPRAGUE AVE. __ EIUTAIL.Jchn +�hllat GUITI,a,,,,fte...,____yailey_ 1T�1 TAT IR: SPOKANE,WA _ 1 .,..1�_ _..__ : (5_ ___ H96 _--__- .i PROPERTY OWNER 1 DIFFERENT FROki APPLIC. _ . .------__— _.�.�_.._ _____ ....-_.,---- ' SHO NAME �.., NE.. ._._ I ADDRESS: _ _ - - 1 EMAIL: . 6 ' CITY/STATE_ _._. /ZIP:IP: FARC: _..._.---- _.._.... ,_.. _. .- �J PROPERTY OWNER 2 [IF MORE THAN TWO PROPERTY'OWNERS,ATI-AM SEPARATE SHEEr) __ - . .... NAME' P F ICIV E �ADD_FIESS. .. iEMAILT- ... ._. ...�_- .._ _ ICIT -/§TATEdli:'r____. '.- — _,._ , •, -- ---P -- - :.FAX- : AGENT/CONSULTANT/ATTORNEY _..-- ._, PHoNg.• (§11: 12,24-6423 NAME: __ T. PETERSON --1__ 1 -_-- EMAIL.Iohnpeterson @ pr€ngcorp.com ADDRESS: 8412 E. SPRAGUE AVE. __. • _ .. ... 1 tTY/S ATE} IP: SP. OK4NE,WA 99212 L f L..-....._ . LAND USE MAP CHANGE PROPOSAL: _O _---_-.. -•-. r_ CURRENT DESIGNATION _ PROSEE DESIGNATION LAND USE MAP - •C LOW DENSITY RESIDENT—AILCO>w1MUNrFY COMMERCIA1JHIGH DE°NS t !- __,_. -.._— -- --. __--- RESIDENTIAL .__ . ._. _---- i , ZONING MAP I un-7 B-2/un-22 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY_CHANGE PROPOSAL(ATTACH SEPARATE SHEET IF.NECE5S,9r�Y)'._..� Rµ n____�.. .LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. UR-3.5 AND UR-7 ZONES. 1 CURRENT POLICY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL, WHICH ALLOWS FOR COMMUNITY BUSINESS IN I THE a-2 ZONE FOR LOTS 1, 2, AND A PORTION OF LOT 3, ON THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO MARKED EXHIBIT "Ba AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF. TO FURTHER ALLOW FOR HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL FOR A PORTION OF LOT 3, AND LOT 4, AND A G PROPOSEDPORTION OF LOT 5 OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED HERETO. THIS Pi3LICYCHANGE WOULD ALLOW FOR THE EXISTING USE OF THE COMMERCIAL OPERATION FOR A HICO VILLAGE CONVENIENCE STORE, A WENDYS FAST 1 FOOD OPERATION AND FOR THE RENTAL OF OTHER COMMUNTLY BUSINESSES CURRENTLY EXISTING ON THE PROPERTY. INSOFAR AS THE 1 CHANGE FROM UR-7 TO UR-22,WE ARE PLANNING THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APARTMENT COMPLEX AS SET FORTH ON EXHIBIT "C" WHICH IS ATTACHED HERETO AND BY THIS REFERENCE MADE A PART HEREOF, I SUCH CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE SUBJECT TO THE CHANGE IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND CHANGE IN THE ZONING MAP FROM UR-7 TO UR-22. OFFICE USE ONLY: Q City Initiated D Citizen Initiated Concurrency Review Required: ID Yes 0 No Date Received: Received By: PART II LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE (Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner) I, John T. Peterson (print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE REST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON HISIJ-1ER BEHALF. ADDRESS: 41.2 E, Sprague Ave. PHONE: 009) 924-6423 Spokane, WA 99212 (City) (State) PA1Ft BUSINESS Po NC_ CR . Partner •�- . 4 July 11,200 11111rohn T. Peterson, Be'retery (Date) NOTARY STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this 11th�daayy►of Jul 2003 .� ¢ �. � 410, ,1441Lt."65 • NOTARY SIGNATURE Notary Public in and for the State of Washington E Residing at: 616 E. Sumter Way PUIB1.tO . • 0: Spokane, WA 99208 �" 11, C; f'r� f3 Wi V,\.,,' My appointment expires: 3/11/06 PART III SITE DATA PROJECT/PROPOSAL SITE AREA(ACRES OR SQ.FT.) 133800 SQUARE FEET ADJACENT ARE OWNED OIC CONTROLLED(ACRES OR SQ.FT.) -0 EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY: 1-11C0 VILLAGE CONVENIENCECENTER/VACANT LAND SCHOOL DISTRICT` ' #356 ---•--•-..__��._._ FIRE DISTRICT WATE=R DISTRICT: I CONSOLIDATED NEIGHBORHOODASSOCIATION: --- I UNKNOWN _��l PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD ACCESSING PROPERTY: I PUBLIC WIDTH OF PROPERTY FRONTING PUBLICiPRIVATE POAD: 1270 FEET ACCESS TO EXISTING OR PLANNED ARTERIAL? (YI'N) ' YES _ NAME OP ARTERIALRC],4DsT BARKER RD, SF-IARPE AVE., BOONE AVE _�� PREVIOUS ZONING/LAND USE DECISION LIST PREVIOUS PLANNING ACTIONS INVOLVING THIS PROPERTY: IN THE YEAR 2000 SPOKANE COUNTY APPROVED THE EXISTING NICO VILLAGE CONVENIENCE CENTER ON LOTS 1,2, AND A PORTION OF 3 OF THE GAL DESCRIPTION EXIH IBITBk HERETO. THE CONVENIENCE STORE WAS I APPROVED UNDER PREVIOUS ZONING CODES FOR 1-2,WHICH INCLUDED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE B-3 ZONE. CHANGED CONDITIONS WHAT ARE THE CHANGES CONDITIONS WHICH WARRANTS THIS PROPOSED CHANGE? THE CONDITIONS THAT HAVE CHANGED SiNce THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THIS PROJECT ARE THE CONVENINECE STORE AND THE TENANTS THeREIN SERVICE THE GENERAL AREA IT SURROUNDS,AND IS WELL PLACED WTH I RESPECT TO ANY ADJOINING MIXED USES,AND HAS HERETOFORE BEEN RECENTLY APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES HAVING JURISDICTION. PROPOSAL I PROVIDE GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: 66 TO APPROVE THE CHANGE OF THE CURRENT DESIGNATION OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL AND HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. THIS CHANGE WILL PROTECT THE CURRENT EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ON THE PROPERTY FROM A "TAKING" BY GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES WHICH WE BELIEVE ERRORED WHEN IMPLEMENTING THE LAST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE. WITH REGARD TO AN APARTMENT BUILDING ON A PORTION OF LOT 3, LOT 4, AND A PORTION OF LOT 5 OF THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION INCLUDED HEREINw WE BELLEVE THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL SUFFER THE RESIDENTIAL USES TO THE WEST AND NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, THE PROPOSAL INCULDES THE EXISTING USES CF A 11100 CONVENIENCE STORE OPERATION CURRENTLY EXISTING O1 LOTS 1, 2, AND A PORTION OF LOT 3 OF THE HEREIN ATTACHED LEGAL DESCRIPTION, AND WE PROPOSE TO CONSTRUCT AN APARTMENT BUILDING ON THE REMAINDER OF THE SUBJECT PORPERTY (A PORTION OF LOT 3, LOT 4, AND A PORTION OF LOT 5)1 AS SET FORTH ON THE ATTACHED SITE PLAN MARKED EXHIBIT"Ca . ADJACENT LAND USES r DESCRIBE EXISTING LAND USES WITHIN THE VICINITY OF PROPOSAL: UNDER ADJACENT LAND USES THERE ARE RESIDENTIAL USES CURRENTLY EXISTING ON THE NORTH,EAST,AND ; WEST OF THE SITE, AND TO THE SOUTH IS LAND OWNED BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR AGUESS TO AND ADJOINING THE EXISTING FREEWAY LOCATED APPROXIMATLEY 1/8 OFA MILE TO THE SOUTH. i i F . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY DESCRIBE HOW PROPOSAL IS CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN—CITE SPECIFIC GOALS/POLICIES: —14 IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT WHEN THE CURRENT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WAS ADOPTED IN MAY 2002, THE SPECIFIC GOALS IN THE POLICIES OF THE LAND FOR COMMERCIAL USE WERE AS FOLLOWS: 1. GOAL: UL.13; PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL LAND WITHIN URBAN GROWTH AREAS TO CONVENIENTLY SERVE THE LOCAL AND REGIONAL TRADE AREAS. 2_ POLICIES. UL,13.1, DESIGNATE A VARIETY OF STATEGICALLY LOCATED COMMERCIAL AREAS THAT WILL BE ACCESSIBLE F3IOM ROADWAYS OF MAJOR ARTERIAL CLASSIFICATION OR HIGHER, SERVED V TJ-1 UT1LITIES AND FREE OF MAJOR ENVIORNMENTAL CONSTRAINTS. INSOFAR AS HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL USES, WE BELIEVE THIS AREA PROPERLY BUFFERS THE EXISTING RESIDENTIAL AREAS DESCRIBED PREVIOUSLY. PUBLIC FACILITIES DESCRIBE AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES, 'INCLUDING,ROADS,WATER,SEWER,PARKS,AND PUBLIC TRANSIT: ! THE PROPERTY' IS SERVED BY ALL PUBLIC FACILITIES INCLUDING COUNTY AND STATE ROADS, PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY, PUBLIC SEWER SUPPLY,PUBLIC TRANSIT,AND PRIVATE GABAGE PICK UP. THE ROADS ARE MAINTAINED BY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, SPOKANE COUNTY, (NOW CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY). WATER IS SERVED BY I CONSOLIDATED IRRIGATION DISTP_ICT419,SEWER IS PROVIDED BY SPOKANE COUNTY,AND GARBAGE IS PROVIDED I� BY WASTE MANAGEMENT OF SPINE. WE BELIEVE THE S.T.A. SERVES THE AREA FOR PUBLIC TRANSIT. IA • a A Mil 0 111 iffi iffi al 111 M 11 a IS Ili Mil MI .... EKETIBIT ''A." ityry ÷_________,.._._.a.__.._____:_. ______.___•_____. __:.. .--___ .______+_. I L t 41 ... -43, I sa• 1 i I I r I 7flirl' .° i 1 i I i 1 . i i I 1 4 1 11 Cn" e ii r:A775r:••,,---- , ,., •.--.'Pl.- 7=,"'--r-IL 1.,.... ' t,3.-:::: ,,, r,,,:.•. .ii, .,•,. .,,, .,:„.1, in E. 1 1 ® .,_} 11:-..ig'Fi-FI::1 t pin •.-. tr.v.A i-l• 1 , u;,... Iv -. h :%IL I d; ' '-' '&Jr.\ •:'Lt:: . • J 21.4 ' .: .--,... -',..g . - :`...1.• .A7' r g : i I 1 I I 1;1 1 o t=lbhr• Volil=i 1 I I , z i 1 - iF i 1 . EH 1 175PA o I J.4.... I ..at,.. ...... ,...,dil■ 1 I I ,--r- I I .-1 .. tr. . - — —7:5--—--— tz1,1 — --- _ . ri 1 14 I .11f ; 1110 .r?- ia• ' 11.e—, 1 0 0 1 0 4.0 Et, to 4 1 ----* xi : I 4 . , 0 1 , I 1 7/ • i ,T I> I .I. I - r . r, . . . i . L Ill I. ''''''0 . _ ... . P21 A 11 1 i t'r ; I 1 1 1 I .. I I I I I EXHIBIT r,ci r ! is r — s .+.aro { +O#Ci. i *„ • 1, awl-. 6 Cf...t_.. . • —71- ' fa' .,„ Li - 1 i '. j 0rimfi.r I tempt ` 1 1 1 . . -"'1 czar' f • I ., 6 Ui,wT'4 i • * 141i" ' . . . i A . .:::;.) ,,,� , zci a ` y . (....?:‘. . • .._____,--, I ' . 1 °.' 1 IT _ . 1 fes..L I .,,. . it , __.. : # . . .1.1.jwir5 . i,'! : -- I _ iiiIIIIT ., . .- . ' ' Ill.'11,41T I it , 1,4i- -; — . f I �] [�y] CO. r ro (::.11 i',....:.) Vivwcwil - Im - . 410;1/ jewrsogb e . . la GINElimr=n 14 06 . 4 • upwri ILitia faz.,,tc, 5.1 • I .4 s;si-eaeusosi -aosst, lesiaRITHaisia i i ra d F F :lva ECS 40 yah _J}v CITY 011poune ,.., S Department of Community Development 401110*Valley LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION DATE: August G, 2003 FILE #: CPA-03-07 APPLICANT: P & T Partners (John Peterson) Agent LOCATION: The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Barker Road and Boone Avenue, Spokane Valley, WA REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential on the western portion of the subject property and Low Density Residential to Community Commercial on the eastern portion of the property; corresponding zoning map amendment on the western portion of the site from Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), to Urban Residential 22 (UR- 22); a zoning map amendment on the eastern portion of the property from Urban Residential-3.5 to Community Business (B-2). l`�•il'!1'=.,ti r_1'+1�r1`✓,.....hr'r^!: ......., _ d-'. _ .. .,, ^.P.!`,+`.'1*.!^/-?r'•^✓f+,'s'+,.':-fi '�as y^s JJ:s..±'.._.-_ ..,' _ Background The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Barker Road and Boone Avenue and is addressed as 1201 North Barker Road. The subject property is comprised of approximately 3 acres. The eastern portion of the subject property is developed with a convenience store that includes a fast food restaurant and gas station. The westerly portion of the subject property is currently vacant; the applicant proposes to construct multi family dwellings in this area if the comprehensive plan and zoning maps requests are approved. The site is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north — vacant land and residential zoned UR-3.5 and 1-2; south — Boone Avenue and 1-90 interchange; east Barker Road and residential uses zoned UR-3.5; and west —residential uses zoned UR-- 3.5. The existing development on the site was approved by Spokane County in 2000. At the time of the development approvals, the easterly portion of the property was zoned 1-2 by the County, which allowed commercial and retail uses. The existing use is now considered a "nonconforming' use under the city's zoning code 1 SEPA Analysis The requested comprehensive plan map and rezone is considered a "non-project" action under SEPA. This request will result in what could be considered a correction to the comprehensive plan map and zoning map to the eastern portion of the subject property that was developed with the commercial and retail uses_ The applicant does not include specific provisions for the construction of the multi family portion of this proposal. The requested rezone, if approved, would likely result in development proposal for the westerly portion of the subject property. A more appropriate time to assess the environmental impacts of a development on this property would be at a time when a project specific environmental review is conducted. Recommendation Staff recommends that a Determination of Nonsignificance be issued for the proposed comprehensive plan and zoning map amendment 2 („Pitt'°F. C27 City of Spokane Valley DETERMINATION CW NONSIGNEFICANCE Description of proposal; Request a Comprehensive Plan Map amendment from Low Density Residential. to High Uensit Residential and Community Commercial and a rezone from Urban Residential 3.5 (LTR- 3.5to Ta rban Residential 22 -22 and Comzrittx�i Business 2 . Proponent Cit.,of Spokane Valley Location of proposals including street address, if any_ This action is considered a non-protect action under RCW 43.21C and is located on the northeast corner of Barker Road and Boone Avenue in the NE 1/'a cif Section 18,Township 25 No45 EWM;Spokane Valley Washington. Lead agency: City of Spokane Valley. The lead agency for this proposal has deieerm-ined that 1t does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is riot required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on tUe with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request [ 1 There is no comment period for this DNS. [ ] This DNS is issued after using the optional DNS process in section 197-1.1-355 WAC. There is rio further comment period on the INS. .i;ta This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2);the lead agency will not ayirpri this o 14 days_from the date below. Comments must be submitted by �� ,5 Responsible official: Marina Sukap,AICP Position/title: Director of Community Development Phone:(509)921-1000 Address: 11707 East Sprague Avenue,Suite 1061;Spokane Valley,WA_99206 Date Uri- 0 '. • c,03 Signature 0'11 '-`Q F .61` .12 You may appeal this determination to(name) Marina Sukup a (location) City Hall located at11707 East Sprague Avenue,Spokane Valley iA no later than(date) 5:00 p.m. - by(method) Written Statement of Appeal You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Greg McCormick,AICF to read or ask about the procedures for SEM appeals. 1 Distribution List: 1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2_ Spokane County Department of Public Works,Gerry Gemmt_ll 3. Spokane Regional Health District;Steve Holderby 4. Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement,Jeff Forry 5. Washington State Department of Transportation;Mark Rohwer 6. Spokane County Fire Protection District No.1 7. Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 8 S. Carnhope Irrigation District No. 7 9. Consolidated irrigation District No. 19 10. East Spokane Water District No. 1 11. Hutchinson Irrigation District No. 16 12. Irvin.Water District No. 6 13. Model Irrigaaiion District No. 18 14. Modern Electric Water Company 15. Spokane County Water District No. 3 16. Trerttwood Irrigation District No. 3 17. Vera Irrigation District No. 15 18. City Of Spokane,John Mercer 19. City of Liberty Lake,Doug Smith 20. City of Millwood,I-leather Cannon 21. Central Valley School District,Dave Jackman 22. East Valley School District,12325 E. Grace 23. West Valley School District,Dave Smith 2 Vicinity Map .....-__ ...m. ,..7rairmirl iw.... MI up S .m. m.mmi. i.miiitialmimiffirdpardwomom,...mdr,t_ ,, rte •MIS1 m•rof r r-,,, ,,,(ifz,",P .a ,S- 1 NM ErAPSKO4 IIIIXII . mmig �.00ne _ pl i 90 E293 ON I 1 I Woo I , 11 ------117/: oi DI L 90 W292 ON ISO W293 OFF I90 1 94 I /go 30 F }94 g3[N . -- —— d August/5,2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment agoCPA-D3-07 ,' p� , Fit , * alley _r_,._ Department ofCommunity Development po . ne . LONG RANGE PLANNING DIVISION .00,0vailey Staff Report Subject: 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals Hearing Date: August 28, 2003 Staff: Greg McCormick, AICP — Long Range Planning Manager Scott Kuhta, AICP — Long Range Planner Marina Sukup, AICP --Community. Development. Director Background The Spokane Valley Interim Comprehensive Plan includes an annual amendment cycle that runs from July 2nd to July 1st of the following year. Applications received prior to July 1't are considered by the Planning Commission in August and September, with a recommendation forwarded to the City Council in later September or early October_ A decision by the City Council is lo be made no later than December of each year. All parts of the Comprehensive Plan can be amended during the annual cycle. The Community Development Department received 7 requests for site-specific Comprehensive Plan amendments for 2003. Sites that are approved for a comprehensive plan amendment will automatically receive a zoning designation that is consistent with the new land use designation. Attachments to this report include application materials, SEPA documentation, land use maps and zoning maps to assist the Commission's review. Notice The Community Development Department placed advertisements in the Spokesman- Review on June 5, 7, 12 and 14, 2003, notifying the public that comprehensive plan amendment applications would be accepted until July 1, 2003. On August 13, 2003, notice Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments of the Planning Commission's public hearing was placed in the Spokesman-Review, Each site was posted with a "Notice of Land Use Application" sign, which included a map and description of the proposal. Finally, individual notice of the proposals was mailed to all property owners within 400 feet of each amendment. SEPA Review Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA T RCW 43_21C) environmental checklists were required for each proposed comprehensive plan amendment. Under SEPA, amendments to the comprehensive plan are considered "non-project actions"which are defined as actions involving decisions on policies, plans, or programs that contain standards controlling use or modification of the environment. Additional environmental review may be required for the actual development of the subject properties. Staff reviewed the environmental checklists and a threshold determination was made for each comprehensive plan amendment request. Determinations of Nonsignificance (DNS) were issued for the requested comprehensive plan amendments on August 8, 2003. The DNS's were published in the city's official newspaper on August 13, 2003 consistent with City of Spokane Valley requirements. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Proposals CPA-03.01 Applicant: Gib Brumback Request: Change the land use designation from Low-Density Residential to Regional Commercial and the zoning from UR-7 (UR-7) to (P-3). Location: 8915 East Montgomery - West of Argonne Rd., on the north side of Montgomery and south of the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way. Site Area: 2.76 acres Existing Use: 15,000 sq. ft self-storage building, self serve car wash and R1lltruck storage. Adjacent Uses: Railroad to the north, commercial to the west, residential to the south. Public Facilities: The property is currently served with public water and sewer and is accessed from a paved, public street. Previous Land UselZoning: The subject property was zoned commercial in 1970. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low-Density Residential and applied the August 14, 2003 Page 2 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments UR-7 zone The request is to re-establish the previous commercial zoning and be consistent with existing uses on subject property. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The interim Comprehensive Plan land use map designates the Argonne corridor between 1-90 and Trent Ave. as a Community Center, which is a higher-intensity, mixed-use area designed to serve two or more neighborhoods. These areas have a mix of uses, including commercial, civic, high-density residential and recreational uses. Existing zoning along the Argonne corridor is largely B-3 and UR-22 transitioning to UR- 3,5. The Applicant requests that the Regional Commercial land use designation be applied to the subject property. This designation is not consistent with the adjacentCommunity Center designation. Recommendation Change property to Community Center, consistent with adjacent properties. Apply the B-2 zone consistent with the Phase 1 Development Regulations. All current uses on the property are allowed in the B-2 zone. (See Attachment 1 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) CPA-03-02 Applicant: Associated Restaurants, Inc. (Richard Repp) Request: Change land use designation from Neighborhood Commercial to Regional Commercial and zoning from B-I to B-3_ The application indicates that the property is designated Medium Density residential, which is not correct_ Location: South side of Appleway Blvd. across from Dishman Dodge, east of Park Road. Site Area: 3 acres Existing Use: The property is currently vacant. Adjacent Uses: The Rose Haven Mobile Home Park is located directly west of the subject property, with vacant hillside land to the south and east. Dishman Dodge is located across Appleway to the north. Public Facilities: The subject property is located within East Spokane Water District# t (WATER RIGHTS?? The area was sewered by Spokane County in 2001 and is accessed by Appleway Blvd. Previous Land UselZoning: 1n December, 2D01, the property was zoned Neighborhood Commercial (B-1) by Spokane County. The Applicant originally requested the County to August 14, 2003 Page 3 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments zone the property B-3, which was conditionally approved by the Hearing Examiner. This decision was appealed to be Board of County Commissioners, who decided to zone the property B-1 in December, 2001. The major issue concerning this property is the potential impact commercial development will have on the Dishnian Hills Natural Area, located south of the site and the precedent that would be set by allowing commercial development south of Appleway. Spokane County adopted their Comprehensive Plan in November, 2001 and Phase 1 Development Regulations implementing the Comprehensive Plan in January, 2002. The 2001 Comprehensive Plan designated the subject property Medium Density Residential with the Phase 1 Regulations applying the UR.-12 zoning designation. The zoning history of the subject property was brought to the City Council's attention prior to the date of incorporation. When the Council adopted the County's Comprehensive Plan, the subject property received the Neighborhood Commercial land use designation. This was followed with a zone change to Neighborhood Commercial, consistent with the decision made by the County Commissioners in December, 20101. Comprehensive Plan.!2oning Analysis: The entire south side of Appleway Blvd., from Coleman to Sargent Ave., is designated Medium Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan map, except for the subject property, which is currently designated Neighborhood Commercial. Properly north of Appleway is designated Medium Density Residential and Regional Commercial. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Regional Commercial category as intensive commercial areas intended to draw customers from the County at large and other outlying areas. Regional shopping centers and major commercial areas will be designated with this classification. The Neighborhood Commercial classification designates small-scale neighborhood-serving retail and office use. Community Commercial designates areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods. Recommendation: The proposed site is bound by a manufactured home park to the west and hills to the south and east. These constraints, and the size of the subject property, will limit development in this area to the subject site. The Neighborhood Commercial designation does not appear appropriate in this instance because the site will not serve a single neighborhood. Further, at 3 acres, the site is large enough to support commercial businesses that will not fit into the Neighborhood Commercial classification, either by size or intensity. Conversely, the Regional Commercial designation is perhaps too intense for this particular site. Staff recommends designating the property Community Commercial and applying the B-2 zone, which will allow more flexibility and marketability to the site, but will limit future impacts of development that would be allowed under the Regional Commercial designation and B-3 zone. (See Attachment 2 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2D03 Page 4 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments CPA-03-03 Applicant: Thomas Smith Request: Change the land use designation from High Density Residential to Light Industrial and change zoning from UR-22 to 1-2. Location: West side of Pines Road between the Union Pacific Railroad Right-of-Way and Mansfield Avenue. Site Area: 2.5 acres Existing Use; Vacant Adjacent Uses: Property to the west, across Pines Rd., includes a restaurant, an office and a convenience store. A mobile home court is directly west of the site and the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way adjacent to the south property line. Public Facilities; Public water is available to the site through Irvin Water District. The area is scheduled for sewer construction during 2003: however, the Applicant recently opted out of the County's sewer program. The County would have provided a sewer stub to the property from the sewer extension along Mansfield Avenue and charged the property with a sewer general facility. The Applicant decided to opt out of the program, indicating that he would be responsible to extend a sewer line under the railroad right-of- way to an existing main line. in either case, any new development would be required to connect to the public sewer system. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The property was zoned Restricted Industrial in 1976, which would have allowed construction of a commercialtindustrial development. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property High Density Residential and followed with a UR-- 22 zoning designation in 2002, Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The Interim Comprehensive Plan designates a large area west of Pines and north of the railroad right-of-way High Density Residential. This category allows for multi-family apartments and office uses. Land on the east side of Pines is designated Community Center, an intense mixed-use area. Property to the south, including the railroad property, is designated Light Industrial. The Comprehensive Plan states that Light Industrial category is intended for industrial areas that have a special emphasis and attention given to aesthetics, landscaping and internal and community compatibility". Office and commercial uses that support and compliment the industrial areas are allowed. Recommendat-lore Change property to Light Industrial and zone 1-2, consistent with previous 1976 zoning and policies within the Interim Comprehensive Plan. (See Attachment 3 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 6 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive plan Amendments CPA-03-04 Applicant: Doug Lydig (John Sweitzer, Agent) Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to Light Industrial and zoning from UR-7 to 1-2. Location: Golf Dome property at Cataldo Avenue, west of Bradley and adjacent to Beauty Bark. Site Area: 2.57 acres Existing Use: Indoor golf practice facility. Adjacent Uses: Industrial and commercial uses, including a landscape supply business to the east, a UPS trucking facility to the west and scattered residential parcels to the north. Public Facilities: Public sewer won't be available to the site until 2005. Public water is supplied by Spokane County Water District No. 3. The site is accessed by a public road. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The site was rezoned from 1-2 to B-3 by Spokane County in 1994 to allow for construction of the indoor golf facility and pro shop. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low Density Residential and followed with a UR-7 zoning designation in 2002. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The subject property is surrounded on three sides by Light Industrial property, with Low-Density Residential property to the north_ The requested Light Industrial designation is consistent with the surrounding designations. Recommendation: Change land use designation to Light Industrial and change zoning to 1-2. (See Attachment 4 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) CPA-03-05 Applicant: Dave Nerren (Lexington Homes) Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential and change zoning from UR-3.5 to UR-22. Location: Between Broadway and Cateldo Avenue, west of Pines Road. Site Area: 3 acres August 14. 2003 Page 6 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Existing Use: Largely vacant except for a single-family dwelling. Adjacent Uses: Residentiallvacant land to the west, single-family residential to the north and east. Public Facilities: The property has public sewer available; water is provided by Modern Electric Water Company. Access to the site is from Broadway Avenue, a four lane principal arterial. Previous Land Use{Zoning: The subject property has been zoned single-family residential for many years. Property directly east received a zone change to UR-22 in 1978 and is designated High Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Land Use Map_ Comprehensive PlanfZoning Analysis: The subject site is located within a transition area between single-family residential and office uses. Property directly east is designated High Density Residential while property to the west and north is designated Low Density Residential; property south, across Broadway, is designated Medium Density Residential and zoned UR-22. The request is consistent with Policies UL.2.15, UL.2.20 and Goal UL.7 of he Urban Land Use chapter of the Interim Comprehensive Plan. Recommendation: Change property to High Density Residential and change zoning to UR-22. (See Attachment 5 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps,) CPA-03-O6 Applicant: Harold Salt Request: Change property from Low Density Residential to High Density Residential. Location: North side of Broadway, west of Evergreen Road between Blake and Maurer Rd. Site Area: 5+ acres Existing Zoning!Land Use: The property is currently zoned UR-22 and is developed with a independent retirement complex called Broadway Court Estates. The Applicant is requesting to expand the facility to the east, into vacant residential property. Adjacent Uses: The site is surrounded by the following uses and zoning districts: north— vacant land zoned UR-3,5; south — Broadway Avenue, church and single family zoned UR- 3.5; east-- single family residential zoned UR-3.5, and west— unimproved Blake Road and Blake elementary playtields zoned UR-3.5. August 14, 2003 Page 7 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan Amendments Public Facilities: The site is currently served with water by Vera Water and Power and is connected to public sewer. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The majority of the proposed site was zoned UR-22 in 1998 to allow for the development of the retirement facility. In 2001, Spokane County designated the property Low Density Residential but did not change the UR-22 zoning. Therefore, the existing Comprehensive Plan designation is not consistent with the current zone and use of the property. The proposed expansion area to the east is designated Low Density Residential and zoned UR-3.5. Comprehensive PianlZoning Analysis: It appears that the County erred in designating the subject property Low Density Residential in 2001, The expansion area to the east would not have a significant impact on the neighborhood and is consistent with Comprehensive Plan Policy UL 2.17. Recommendation: Change the entire site to High Density Residential, including the separate parcel fronting Broadway and surrounded by the subject property. Apply the UR- 22 zone to the expansion area. (See Attachment 0 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) CPA-03-07 Applicant: P &7 Partners (John Peterson, Agent) Request: Change property from Low-Density Residential to High-Density Residential on the western portion and Community Commercial on the eastern portion. The requested zoning is UR-22 on the western portion and B-2 on the eastern portion. Location: The property is located on the west side of Barker Road, between Boone and Sharp Avenue. Site Area: Total area is about 3 acres, which will be split approximately in half by the Community Commercial/High Density Residential designations. Existing Use: The eastern portion is developed with a convenience store/service station and fast food restaurant. The western portion is vacant. Adjacent Uses: Property to the north is currently being developed into a R.V./Boat storage facility; south is Washington State D.O.T. property (part of the I-9OlBarker interchange); east and west is residential. Public Facilities: Water is served by Consolidated Irrigation District #19; access is via public roads maintained by Spokane County, The existing convenience store/fast food restaurant is connected to the County's sewer line on Barker Rd. by a private 2° line. August 14, 2003 Page 8 of 9 Staff Report 2003 Comprehensive Plan .Amendments Development of the western portion may require connection to the County's sewer line to the west, which is yet to be constructed. Kevin Cooke, Spokane County Utilities, informed the Community Development Staff that a line will be constructed about 1000' east of the Flora and Mission intersection. The developer of the subject property would be required to extend sewer to this location, rather than east to Barker Road. Engineering issues aside, future development on the site would be required to connect to the County's public sewer system. Previous Land Use/Zoning: The property was converted to 1-2 zoning in 1957, 1958 and 1971. The convenience store was constructed in 2000. In 2001, Spokane County designated the area Low-Density Residential on the Comprehensive Plan Map and applied the UR-7 zone. Comprehensive Plan/Zoning Analysis: The existing use of the property is not consistent with the current Low-Density Residential designation and UR-7 zoning. The requested Community Commercial designation for the eastern portion of the site is consistent with the existing use. The Comprehensive Plandescribes Community Commercial as "areas for retail, service and office establishments intended to serve several neighborhoods". Policy UL.2.16 encourages the location of medium and high density residential categories near commercial areas and public open spaces and on sites with good access to arterials. Policy UL_2.17 encourages multifamily homes to be integrated into or next to neighborhood, community or urban activity centers; and integrated into small, scattered parcels throughout existing residential areas_ Recommendation: Community Development staff supports the requested Community Commercial designation for the existing commercial business on the eastern portion of the site. However, staff does not support designating the western portion High Density Residential, but does recommend designating the site Medium Density residential. This will provide for a better transition between commercial and single-family residential and will have less impact on the existing single-family neighborhood. (See Attachment 7 for application materials, SEPA documentation and related maps.) August 14, 2003 Page 9 of 9 • • 1 y4 u a. 1 ii„.Ir.i.•,,h,r.._'.. -IMP"- ., .1 1:1$.1110110121-1; .. Tr •,r' 1 - r",a. AR' ' _ r - - , - ..fir, k $ ,_„_-2,“-,14-' 9e_ . --: 41-r Ate, ... .w. t.. _. - ._-_•... _ - ' _ Gia - - I" +..+: (3c +'S s.. et- V _ ., l .14Irelmik a• P 4milam•-, .,..::.,-..Y,..„.......,,_ .• .1 Prilm ',--- ' •- , ••• '.. : •.,- .. .... •. ..1. 4. . . MIMI. .. J . • . 1 ' •. . .r.- .. . ' 7 . . . . , . . . • .. . ' .. I ., I11 .. t . ••• • ..._ 7 ... 11111 .ii.. °111 .• , , . I ,. . - _ — ' — ' • ' - -. : ... ‘"'..4.:—.?..'.,„ '''- ....-,,-..: . - • --- . -- • -° • . ... .. . . . - c. . • • ' .. - •. -. ---. .. .. , . „ . . '• A c- i',., e-e6e- . . ,. . . . . . , . . . . . , .• •'• ' -,.-:-.,*i.-.. • 1.-7.jr.. . -... :. : .,r.,-.. .....--. .. ...A.,-.'..'...:..,,...,...i.,. .•.46:• . ! .'4!•01.°)L.,,,. ;. .. . . \•., , . .f N . . , ' ' -,--.'. - - - . ,I. • ' ifig Fat — c . . • - • -. ...L.:.,. ...- .r.. 4 • • - IN • - . .— - .. 111111711111. . _ = '-;.„.oligZi'7.: . . 4 .• .., .. .--., .. -L. .,,i -1,•••:',-!'c'4.L...p:.• .-,,• • - - - . . , . ,. . .... _ . . .. . „, .. . ., 4-:', : ' . .. . • ' ,.e„,''ItliPTIF&^^4.-...... ===....ont,rd '1A'. .,7 '''' ':f.. !-.1.:11:•:..V: !•-••••• :. -.. - ''' .1 r .. ......, - - . _-..., .-. P---.. . nF , . - 1 1.1 - .. • , .- ••• - rzi,,it;. r' Z.1,-; - '''' ' . - - - .. c ' .-- ' ' ' ,, U.. q• -. I. -....., -:- '-'.: '"' •-...:' P'...t.tV't's.'"4-'"IX1-.F.:' ...' :.-e-:''' : ki.-0 ;..-' 1*. 0.41-4: L. : - A v.....-sita)-,- -,.,----- ' -- • , - " . . . . . , ° . ., . , • . . • .:.:--• ;,,,,:,...N..:-::•!..,..4.%?;4..,;.-1p4...:•; -,. -. ,. -'5':.-.-----,-,:.- • - . . . . . ....-, -.-...........' --- -. • — .' ,•-'..- -. -. '-..- ' - •' :."'- " :'''":"".'",• --11.-.1 ,'":';',:,-1. . -: . - •--• ' .__, -6,... • .j,', z, 'r... L...,".3':-' . . . . _ . - . • . , .•.. ".-7,414'Ir.'. '. .. 441401140400#001.7,t,,, " r.",..PtirSt.f7- '•.., , . . . .. iiiiik. ..., ...__,_.-_ -.. ..... .• . -•_. ;—- .. ., . . . 117:' ' .'"' '71'" . .'..' r 41',...;:. , _ ' - • • . . 1 1 1::. . • • - t•'14-) }113- .--1 , r' i , P <_,.... .... . _ .• • . . _. . _.--- a 11111 i . . : -- - _ . . . - ' -i' -I .- .,.161 : '•:--- ' _ .; _ __• „ .:.... _ •.__ __ . ____:_.___„._____ __,... _ ...._ .. ___., ....._ • _______ S .... ,..s...._.,...::_ :y., . . . . - ---r.111911111111 I. . - - . I • • - MliM n O 121_27 1 II i.ill . , Fa I 1 ' " 0 Li I I 11111 mum ..____._.._ . • , . . 1 -- - :- 1 L ,.,t1. . I rl . _ C,I lil=1; '' ' - • - .. _ . .. _.. . .. ..... _ • • ,.• . , -- - - -- -.011101',400.0■-- '•._._ . - . . .._ ._._ _ - • . ., gAvi c .11.J,1_Pa- igtid0 City of Spokane Valley Request for Planning Commission Review DATE: August 28, 2003 TYPE: Consent ❑ Old Business D New Business Li Public Hearing El Legislation El Information ❑ Administrative Report AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Comprehensive Plan—Public Participation Program GOVERNING LEGISLATION: Revised Code of Washington (RCW) 36.70A(Growth Management Act) PREVIOUS COMMISSION ACTION TAKEN: None BACKGROUND: The Washington State Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A, sets forth several state planning goals. Included in the statewide goals is RCIN 35.70A020(11), which states in part, 'Citizen participation and coordination. Encourage the involvement of citizens in the planning process .._". Citizen participation is further addressed in RCW 36.70A.035 Public Participation — Notice Provisions and 35,70A,140 Comprehensive Plans— Ensure Public Participation. RCW 36.70A.140 of GMA requires each city planning under GMA to "establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program". This section of GMA further requires the city provide For 'early and continuous public participation in the development' of the city's comprehensive plan or any amendments. The Washington Administrative Code 365-195-600(2) (WAC) provides recommendations for meeting the public participation requirements of the GMA The specific public participation program is contained in the attached document ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Public Participation Program. STAFF CONTACT: Marina Sukup, AICP, Community Development Director Greg McCormick,AICP, Long Range Planning Manager Scott Kuhta, AICP, Long Range Planner draft it,9\141144 Ono ne .00•117alley COMPREHENSIVE(SIVE PLAN Public Participation Program RCVV 36.7QA.140 of the Washington Growth Management Act requires that each city"establish and broadly disseminate to the public a public participation program ... for early and continuous public participation in the development" of the city's Comprehensive Plan. Consistent with the recommendations of the GMA which emphasize the involvement of the broadest cross-section of the community, including the involvement of groups riot previously involved, the City of Spokane Valley adopts the following program for citizen participation in the planning process: 1. Visioning Process —This process provides Spokane Valley citizens en opportunity to establish a framework and context upon which the comprehensive plan will be based. Planning Commission meetings will provide the forum for the initial community visioning process A draft 'Vision" will be tested for consistency during the development of the Plan as the community identifies priorities and implementation strategies and updated accordingly. The ultimate "Vision"will beestablished at the conclusion of the planning process as a result of community participation. 2. Planning Commission, The Planning Commission will play a key role in establishing the City's dialogue with community members, hosting a series of meetings and workshops during the development of the Plan. The Planning Commission will evaluate information provided by the community and develop recommendations for submission to the City Council. 3. Citizen Survey The City will conduct a statistically valid survey of the citizens of Spokane Valley, Survey questions will address specific issues of the comprehensive plan that will provide city staff, planning commission and city council with meaningful input for development of the comprehensive plan. 4. Public Meetings. Conduct a series of public meetings hosted by the Planning Commission an the preliminary draft comprehensive plan. This ensures that the City will meet the requirement for"early and continuous" public participation in the comprehensive planning process. 5. Public hearings. A series of Public Hearings (not less than three) will be held before the Planning Commission to discuss the draft Plan. It is anticipated that at least two public hearings will be held by the governing body prior to adoption of the Plan. An additional public hearing will be held if substantive changes are made to the Plan document. 6. Public notice. The City will provide notice of all meetings and hearings pursuant to the requirements of RCW 36.70A,020, .035, and .140. 8/2112003 draft 7. Written Comment. The public will be invited to submit written comments as each element of the Plan is developed, as part of any workshops or community meetings. !, Comments will be specifically solicited from residents, special interest organizations and business interests_ Comments may be in the form of letters and other correspondence to the city regarding the plan or comments received electronically on the city's website. Log in all written comments received according to specific area•of comprehensive plan. 8. Communications Programs & Informational Services —As staff and budgetary resourceb. allow, the activities will be undertaken to ensure broad-based citizen participation: a. Comprehensive Plan newsletter— updating the community on planned meetings, workshops or other significant comprehensive plan events. Articles on topics related to the plan and a request for feedback from the community on topics related to the plan. The newsletter will be disseminated via the city's website, emailed to a mailing list and/or provided in paper copy as appropriate_ b. Interest Groups Contact local interest groups (Le. Chamber of Commerce, home builders, environmental, neighborhoods, etc.) and arrange to meet and discuss relevant comprehensive plan issues. c. Community Workshops—Conduct community,workshops hosted by the Planning Commission in different parts of the city to encourage neighborhood participation in the development of the comprehensive plan. These meetings will be held at neighborhood schools, churches or other community facilities, d. Press Releases & Public Service Announcements—Work with the local newspapers, radio stations and televisions stations to advertise and promote significant events related to the comprehensive plan. e_ Provide written articles to local media for publication_ f. Establish a Speaker's Bureau through the Planning Commission which will be available to address service clubs and interested citizen groups_ g. Develop a database of interested citizens and provide regular correspondence concerning the status of Plan development. h. Identify key resource personnel representing agencies and groups whose plans will be integrated into the Comprehensive Plan, including but not limited to fire districts, utilities, libraries and school districts. i. Maintain a log of all public participation meetings, events and actions that the city engages in to provide documentation on the city's effort to meet the requirements of the GMA. SI21/2003 2