The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1178-78 ~ • ~ ~ , AGEIVDA, APRIL 28, 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PI~ANNING COMMISSION TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 Time: Friday, April 28, 1978, 9:30 A.M. Place: County Health Department Auditorium, Room 140 West 1101 College PRELIMINARY SITBDIVISTQ AND ZO1VE ('T,ASSTFT(',QTTCIN 3. PE-1178-78, Pondra Pines 1 st Addition ZE-43-76, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and/or Single Famil.y Residential a. Location: Section 5, Township 24 N., Range 44, E.W.M. Beginni:ng at a point, on the E line of Government Lot 6, 712 feet North of the SE corner thereof; thence Wly on a line para11e1 with the South line of said Lot 6, to a point 220 feet E of the E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Book 8 of plats, page 51; thence Nly, on a line parallel with said E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition a distance of 500 feet; thence Ely parallel with the S line of said Lot 6; to the E line of said Lot 6; thence Sly, along said East line, a distance of 500 feet to the POB. (Approximately located South of 41+th and West of Van Marter.) 'o. Sponsor: Wolfland Inc. S. 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineer: Richard L. Simpson N. 909 Argonne C,~~a I Spokane; WA 99206 d. Site Size: 4 acres . e. Number of lots: 8 f. Land Use proposed by sponsor: Single Family Dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban and/or Single Family Res. i. Water Source: 4lasnington Water Power j. School District: Central Va11ey k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Indi-vidual on-site systems 1. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a si gnificant adverse environmental impact. A ViE N' ~ ' ~ ~2d ~ V I a,6 r,%a A va, POIY~E O5~#< ~ i *01W, -A . a • Q -07 r•r .►v : . . ' ~ ` a ~ , ~ i. ~ ' ~ ~ ~~T}I . ,4V~ ~ l f . ~ • fs ` • ' ~ ~ ♦ ~ ♦ ' . So Tv$ • . . ,e►~,. ~ . 1 • T OR . ~ ~ ~ ~ .e ~1\ C I' ,f PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENYRE BUILDING N 721 ,fEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 , :V~ 1 ~ • ~ . SPOKANE WASHING70N 99260 SPOnnNE CoUnTY CoUR. „oUsE February 4, 1985 Roth Development & Construction Co. Dve. , S. 326 Pi nes Road Spokane, WA. 99206 Dear Gary W. Roth, The Spokane County Treasurer's Office has informed our bffice that your Final Plat of AMENDED Ponderosa Pines lst Addition, is ready to be filed and is being held at the County Treasurer"s Office for you to complete the recording process, (see note 1). You will need to contact the Treasurer's Office (Rene Kiehn at 456-3648) for the amount of property taxes that are required to be paid before recor•dir,g the Final Plat mylar at the Spokane County Auditor's Office. A recording fee of at least $40 for the first mylar page, and $5 for each additional page, is required. Pursuant our phone conversation today, I understand that lots have been sold to various individuals, and some dwellings have been built both in recognition of the Amended Final Plat. The Amended Final Elat Mylar Map must be recorded, other- wise the existing improvements (dwellinas and drainage way) will need to be re- located. ~ I would recorrmend that all lot owners with said plat be informed that the Amended Final Plat is being recorded. If you have any questions, please ca11. Sincerely, JOHN NUNNER Subdivision Administrato JN:kg cc: Sponsor's Surveyor - Clarence E. Simpson Wally Hubbard - Planning Director Gary Nelson - County Engineers Department Note 1- the Board of County Commissioner Resolution No. 81-0696 was signed over 3 years ago, on June 9, 1981. c- - r . , . NO. 81 BEFOPF THF I30AP.D OT' COU117Tf CGVIIAT ~2)IGNEEPS) OF Sx Ojf.ANE COU1~1'21, 0. 21HSNGPON o PE-1178A-78 j ) IN THE MATTER OF AMENDING THE FIIVAL PLAT ~ OF PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION IN RELOCATING' RE S 0 L U T I 0 Pd DRAINAGE EASEh1ENT AND LOT LINES PERTAINING) TO LOT 3 AND LOTS 3& 4? RESPECTIVELY, j PLAT BEING LOCATED IN SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP ) 24N, RANGE 44 E.W.M.,SPOKANE COUNTY,WASH. ) ) BE 7.T P-E"~OLVED AY 'I'HE BOARD OF COUIVTY C01414I5SIONERS OF ►."~POUNE r`,OUNTY , `rlASHINGTGB, that the fzn,-).l pl.at of AP9ENDED PLAT OF PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION Beginning at a point on the east 1ine of Govt.Lot 6, 712 f eet North of the SE corner thereof; thence Wly, on a line parallel with the S line of said Lot 6, to a point 220 f t. east of the east line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Book 8 of plats, page 51; th. Nly on a line parallel with said E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition a distance of 500 ft; th. Ely, parallel with the S line of said Lot 6, to the E line of said Lot 6; th. Sly, along said E line, a distance of 500 ft. to the POB; located in Section 5, Township 24N, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, uJashington. more preciscly ciescrlbed in thc plat dedication, on tfte recommer_datlon of the Spokanc County Planning Commission, bc;, and the samc: htreb-y i,-. approved, writh the exception that the nuhlic rzghts of way cledicated in thir, pl zt iilll not be established for maintenance purposcs until thc: County Engineer has cortifiea that the roads liavc been improved to County standards and approved by sopax'ate resolutlon or the Boaxd of County Commissionerso THIu DAY OF 9 ~ 0/1" SED BY THE BOARD PAS , BOARD OF COUPdTY C0MISSYOPIERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY j WASHINGTOI`l o ' F. KEITH SNEPARD, CNMN. JONN R. MC BRIDE JER . ATTEST: V e OHI,Ay By: , Deputy First American 7'itle Compaf-~y of Spokane West 704 First Avenue • Spokane, Washangtota 99204 •(509) 456-0550 Branch Offices' North 8611 Ui~~i,,inn, Swte R ~ Spokane W.+shmglon 99208 . 15091484-1600 Ord e r 11o.: 2 0 4 7 3 Wlshington Trust f in.incial Center Swtc 1012 ccs : Simpson Engineers Siokflnc,Wa,;hinKton99'1t14 i5091455-6261 v E Spo. County E11CJ111eeY'SNnrth 1014 f inca Ftnxd, suice 17 D Spo. County Planning Spokanc,\VashinRton9920fi 15090922-3244 JAN 20 19$1 FIRST AMENDED PLAT CERTIFICATE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE : Pondra Pines lst laddition (Replat) To: Roth Development and Construction Company East 10126 Ferret Drive Spokane, Washington 99206 Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of January 14, 1981, at 8:00 A.M., for a plat of the following property: Lots l, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1 and Lots l, 21 3 and 4. Block 2, Pondra Pines lst Addition, according to plat recorded in Volume 15 of Plats, page 30, in the County of Spokane, ,State of Washington. This company certifies that record title is vested in ROTH DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., a Washington Corporation, free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, . except as follows: 1. General Taxes for the year 1981, payable February 15, 1981. Amount: $16.26 Tax Account No.: 05441-1802 Affects: Lot 2, Block l, Pondra Pines lst Addition Amount: $16.26 Tax Account No.: 05441-1801 Affects: Lot 1, Block l, Pondra Pines lst Addition Amount: $16.26 Tax Account No.: 05441-1803 Affects: Lot 3, Block 1, Pondra Pines lst Addition Amount: $16.26 Tax Account No.: 05441-1804 Affects: Lot 4, Block 1, Pondra Pines lst Addition Amount: $16.26 Tax Account No.: 05441-1901 Affects: Lot 1, Block 2, Pondra Pines lst Addisiton Amount: $16.26 Tax Account No.: 05441-1902 Affects: Lot 2,'Block 2, Pondra Pines lst Addition Amount: $16.26 Tax Account No.: 05441-1903 Affects: Lot 3, Block 2, Pondra Pines lst Addition Amount: $16.26 Tax Account No.: 05441-1904 Affects: Lot 4, Block 2, Pondra Pines lst Addition *CONTINUED* ' Affilaaeted wath Fcrst Ameracan Tetle Insurance Coinpaizy ,I Order No.: 204' 4 • - Page 2 2. Provisions contained and easements imnosed in the Plat and - Dedication of Pondra Pines lst Addition, recorded in ~ Volume 15 of Plats, Page 30, as hereto attached. ' 3. DEED OF TRUST: Grantor: Roth Development and Construction Company, Inc, a Washington Corporation Trustee: Transamerica Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Sherwood and Roberts, Inc., a Washington Corporation Original Amount: $261,850.00 f Dated: November 6, 1980 Recorded: November 7, 1980 Auditor's File No.: 8011070094 Affects: Lot 2, in Block 1, and Lot 1 in Block 2 and other property. 4. DEED OF TRUST: Grantor: Roth Development and Construction Company, Inc., a Washington Corporation Trustee: Transamerica Title Insurance Company, a Corporation Beneficia=y: Sherwood and Roberts, Inc., a Washington Corporation Original Amount: $120,000.00 , Dated: November 6, 1930 Recorded: November 7, 1980 Auditor's File No.: 8011070095 Affects: Lots l, 3 and 4 in Block l, and Lots 2, 3 and 4 in Block 2. - 5. EASEMENT: Grantee: Inland Power and Liaht Company, a Washington Corporation Purpose: the right, privilege and authority, to install, reinstall, construct, erect, alter, rephase, repair, energize, operate and maintain electric transmission and distribution facilities, consisting of poles, cables, wires and all other necessary or convenient appurtenances, to make said facilities on integrated electric system and in connection with all the foregoing to cut and trim trees and shrubery and cut down from time to time all dead, weak, leaning or dangerous trees that are tall enough to strike the wires in falling, to chip and spread branches and other foliage and to pile and stack logs as necessary alongside the cleared right of way in accordance with REA specifications to the extent necessary to install and maintain said electric system to.gether with all rights incidental thereto. *CONTINUED* I s ; Order No.: 2047_ Page 3 • Recorded: January 6, 1981 Auditor's File No.: 8101060135 Affects: Lots 1 and 2, Block l, and Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. , FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE Fred Troc'himowicz ~ Title Officer FT:ML:kj , ~ i Y ~ , Po~DRA FzNES lst AnDITION No mvre than one detached dwelling structure shal1 be pzaced on any one 1otr nor sha11 any lot be further subdivided for the purpose of creating additional lots or buil.ding sites without fi1ing a replat. A public wate~ system as approved by Caunty and State Health Authorities, the local fa.re district, and the water supplier (purveyor) will be installed within this plat f and the subdivider will prvvide for Yndividual water service as we11 as f ire prvtectzon to each lot prior to sale of each lot. The plattor does hereby dedicate forever the streets shown hereon for public road purgoses. , The owners of Lats 1, 2 and 3t Block 3, and I,ot 3, Block 2 shall Ibe held responsible for abstructing t artlf1Clally collecting ox' discharging, the natural drainaye tlow across or adjacent to their praperty, and shall assume full respn-nsibility for damage to their or any other praperty as a result of their obstructing, artificiall~ collecting or discharging, the drainage flow. The subdivider shall inforrrt each purchaser of the responsibility imposed on each property owner for obstructingr artificially collecting or discharging, the drainage f1ow. Sy permitting the 12 foot wide drainage easement to be platted as shawn herein, Spokane County does not accept the respQnsibility of maintaining the drainage cotxrse nor the responsibility for any damage whatsoever including but not limlted to inverse condemnation to any properties due tQ the drainage flow. Lot 5 r Block 1, as shown herein, is hereby dedicated to Spokane Caunty to be deeded for road purposes forever at such time as adjacent property is platted. T'he Plattor does hereby dedicate to the public the temgorary cul-de- - sac easements, as shown hereon, over and across Lot 4, B1ock 1, and Lots 3 and 4, Block 2. These temporary cul-de-sac easements are granted for road purposes until such time as the xaad is continued as a fu11 width right of way, at which time they will be vacated. Lat 3, Block 2, shall have a 100.00 foot building setbac]c. Minimum floor elevations for Lot 3, Block I and Lot 3, Black 2 I shall be 3.00 feet above the bottom of the drainage draw adjacent to the building. Each 1.ot is authorized far the use of individual on-"site sewage dispasal systems, i , I ;d;. ~ `~'II 1c~ C:011rp~~~~.y r~[-~'~~~l~ac~~~ fi,~aAr~~. Wv.5t i!~•~ ~'~~r,,~ . W11 i ~4~~oJcr~r~~~, bV(J,wli1rt9lur+ JY204 1, .T~'.rAGOR f 509) 456•06,'W PLAT MAP Yvl _/5' ,p~"`i ~~C TwF RNG ~ ~ ~ W 5r*00~ E 354.24 *4. 14 100,00 34 ~ ~o.ao # t ~ ; t~ 1i' 9r i DR D~1 ~li 11 A*! . . ~ t~{~IiR111 AM • ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ tt ~ ~ # • IBLoa{ (D 4 • ~ ~ IDa oQ ~ * t ~ . A ~ lAAlrf rFT ip i . ~ ~ ■ ~•r~Y ~ I i` 'F 2 ~p qb *4~ C7 ~ 1~ ~N ~ 46~ TM , ~ a • AV ENIJE ~ a 3a+a, - ~ ~ ' F1 i~'ad" ~DG 'M[ 4 #s~ ~ ~,00 I23. Te T dP ~ I0 . T~IF011A111~ ~0~ ~ ~ • ! ~ y :r ~ . 8 ?L 'C~ ~ ~ ~ 0" w I 1 : _ ~ ~ ; ~~3 ix ~ 1 I I ; ~ ~ ~ I 4 3 ~ " rt I . ~ r 113000 , ~ ~ ' ~ e a~• ~ r o~ E ~ ~ 4n ~ { I ~ ; F ■ i MD > ~ „ * . . * • i .i 2 ~(7 1 Tpn ~ ~ ■ + ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ + ' { ~ 1 k_ 30 15000 0905z ,ool rv~~ T}{IS MAP fS FcPP I NH'r1trMA'I' f ri*+I ()1VL'Y A~D NOT 1'!1WX" cW I'}I I s' T pri.F E:1Ji i)! N('w This map daell not purport ta show a1l highway*. roads or emments affecting mud property; no Itabtttty iS AnurrMYd for vxnativr~s m ctimonfdons jind Socatian. - ..-i ~ ~ .,~..rt,;h,n...'~ ~r.~. ~,~,~^..-tv"r j~. ~ n~ • ~~:y-•-y„; ~~~fr.S+ik. };.~8'~`~""~ ` ,~,6x,= re'2 ' ~a~ _~7~~~.A, 1I . ~ LIST OF OWNERS AND EfR50N5 PAYINL. TAXES ON F__,)PEaTY Spokane County Code Nuniber: Owners & Persons wi[hin 400 feet. Appllcation is f o r ay'e OG6 o T ~Vc ! r+ ~~-Q QG f'.t t b-* A'•~-k . Certi(ication of Title Conipany: I hereby certify that the following IisC of narnes and adciresses consisting of this and the following pages has beeri prepared from ttie latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct. . Signed bY : L.l For Date: (Title Company) . SUBDIVISION': PONDR.A PINES FIRST LAST GRANTEE IN CfIaIN OF I ~ SuBDiviSIoN NAME ~ iTL"c (O) AND PERSONS ADDRE55 LOT BLOCK PAYING TA?iE5 (T) ; O ROTH DEVEL INC. , , . T ROTH DEVELOPMENT /b I K~q ~7~1 9fizaL ~ o ~ ROTH DEVEL INC. Q~ ~ 2 1 T ROTH DEVELOPMENT ~ 0 ROTH DEVEL INC 3 1 ~ , r ROTH DEVELOPMENT INC. 0 ROTH DEVEL INC W 4 1 . ~ j Y ROTH DEVELOPMENT ~ O ROTH DEVEL INC ~ ~ 1 2 i • T ROTH DEVELOPMENT ~ O ROTH DEVEL INC ROTH DEVELOPMENT ~ I ~ 0 ROTH DEVEL INC ~ T ROTH DEVELOPMENT ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ o ROTH DEVEL INC f ~ .r ~ ~ • T ROTH DEVELOPMENT l ~ I ~ ~ tAAY 16 19$1 v VPOKANE VY~NTY , PUNNIIV6 DEPARTMENt ~ - . ~ , . 1 ! . , S ~ r~30 ' ~ ~ - i; ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i 5teve Horobiowski -J - DOi~~~D C. BROCKETT ~ - - - - SPE7KANE COiliUZY PROSECUTING AT-TDRNEY CE4{IL DEP+4FiTI1fiENT 43r I ~ CQ~lh~TY - CIT1" Pk1SL9C $#FE77 SUI~f31NG YYEST 1115 BR~C}ADW,4Y A1lEh1UE ''CST 1100 i41ALtON AVE?114JE SFmKAhIE. Yid+45HIAiC's7C1h 99260 PkiDfYE 466-5764 SPOK4h1f. WASFiINCaTQIV 99260 ~ •„4 " ri ~ _ PM"iVllE 4~!'a2~~~i 3 • 't, .1AMES P. EMAG10 C'hw Cml DeAvty ~~~~r~4~-• iNovember 20f 1980 ~ ~ ' T' C3ItFA1D A GESI NG F-Fl FUCRAR} M. G EI3RG E UA1l1D A.5ARACENO spaieAwe fGlJ:i7T c06IR7 r4usE R ECEIvED NOV 25 1980 Clarence E. Simpson, ~ivil Engineer North 909 Argonne Road ~~~~E ODUNTY spokane Washi ngton 99206 PLANNING DEP~~EIa Re: Pondra Pines First Ac3dit~on (Revised Drainage map ) ~ea~ Chuck: This evrresponaence is in respvnse to your memo dated Navember 13, 1980 relative to the above captioned matter. In that correspandence you requested clarzfacatiorx from this office on the correct legal procedure ta use in processing an arnendnent to the Pondra Pines First Addi- tion Plat with respect to soxne drainage easements. After discussing your proposal ivith Wally Eubbard, it is the oginian of thi s off ice , at thi s pvint i.n tame, that the provisions of RCV? Chapter 58.12 should be followed in conjunction with the al-teration of the Pondra Pi.nes First Additiran Plat. For your review and assistance, I have enclosed apbotacQpy of RCW Chapter 58.12. From a readang of that chapter you wi11 note that your requesV to the Board to alter the plat as proposed must be accr~~panied by a petitian signed by at least thxee-fourths in number and area of the owraers of the plat itself. It wauld. Iae my suggestion to you to have such petition signed by al1 property ovmers, as indicated by the records in the Sgokane County Auditar's Office. By having a pet~tion - signed by al1the praper ty awner s, the Board of County Commissivners would not have to give the notice as required in RGW Section 58. I2. (l30_ , Although the provisions of RCW Section 58 . 12_ O60 do not provide that the altered plat need b signed by any elected afficials, 3t has been 11--he direction af Qur office ; to the Planning Departm-ent that the amended plat as filed ~ be s3gned by all pragerty owners of re+cord at tae date of ~ ~ , . Clarence E. Simpson, Civil Engineer November 20, 1980 Page Two . its filing as well as the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County and in this instance the County Engineer's Office as well as the Spokane County Planning Director. If you have any further questions in this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, James P. Emacio JPE:is Chief Civil Deputy c c: .Wa 1 ly Hubbard . Steve Horob-.iowski : -doL ROTH DEVELOPMENT ~ CONSTRUCTION ~lrdCo { E. 10126 Ferret Drive *Spakane, Washington 99206 r (509) 928-2948 'III WeRoth Develo ment o 'I ~ ~a 8~ ~ nstructivn Co., Inc. and 5herwood and Roberts, the property owners af Pandra Pines lst ' Addition, request that the drainage easernent be reloca,ted a,nd i the lot line between lot 3 and 4 Bl. 2 be adjusted. I a; " I ~ Roth Development & Const. Co., Inc. , Sherwood & Roberts I I ~ i ; i ~ NO. . BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ZE-43-78 IN THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE ZONING - MAP FROM AGRICULTURAL TO_ AGRICULTITRAL j SUBURBAN ON PROPERTY IACATED IN SECTION ) 5 , TOWNSHIP 24, RANGE 44 E:W+M. SPOKANE ) R E S O L U T I O N CO UNTY, WASHINGTON. ) ~ ) ) The, above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice of the hear- fng on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Plannfng Commission has held a public hearing as required; and that the said Planning Com- mission concurs in the plan to zone the following described property as: AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: ,1 9 ~All that area platted as Pondra Pines lst Additfon, located in Section 5, Township 24, Range 44 E. W. M. Spokane, County, Wa shington . , , I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the abovP-described property be, and the same hereby is zoned under the classification of AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN as defined in the ' Zoning Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amendpd. ; , PASSED,•BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF AUG 13 1979 , 1979. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' OF SPOKANE C OU NTY, W ASHINGTON VERNON W HLAND Clerk of oard ' By: Deputy This is to certify that this is a true and G. KOPET correct o. e , , utiora HARRY MAARHED No. ssed b ~ Pa Y the I3oar t' da of 19 . . ~ +4 1979 By: Deputy ,c,JNE CHANGES POSTED OlV ZO..-.,NG MAPS pplication No. ZJ- Re s . N o . ,L_,f / y,7 Re s . Da t e ,om : 4-fr- To: A--,~5 :)sted By; 1 _ Date Posted; ~ Sec. Two. Range_.&. ~„re s• . EAST ~ (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' I Q~ (Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' Q 1~ ((File Map)Niylar - Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' A/A (File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: l" - 1000' /(l A (File Map) Metro *11 (Director's Office) Scale: 1' - 2000' /'M (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile VA (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles , _i(Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' 'Wa:l Map) Fronr 'IfficP Scale: 1 - 1000' . (File Maps) Mylar Jffice Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 900' MIP Map) Tracina 434 (Sot "h East Zoning Maps) ScalP• - 1000" _Wile Map) Metrc• *lf (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' _ (F. -e Map) Countv- Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile (FiIP Map) Count% ('vtap Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles 18core Cards) Middle Jffice • ~ ~ (i ' • . ~ 3 ♦ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ , • ~ ~ 1+ RECEiPT Date" /-Z 14 -t9 2753 Received From 'V o 14fA , l • ~ Address ' U 4,A r LWa 7•~ 78 Dollars $ 3~L U For ACCOUNT HOW PAID 115agAn CpUNTy pLA1V1ViNG D:.r...l...u.:i'#` AMT OF ~ CASH I ACCOUNT AMT PAID I CMECK G/ 33I W--, BAIANCE MONEY c~C7 C1O v~M%1 O'VU ' ~ DUE l ORDER B I Y ~ 8K846 Redif~rm ~ r, , ` . ~ l ~ wwp 3115 REV B 73 ~ THE WASHINGTON WATER PQWER COMPANY EI ectric dnd Natitral Gas Service , P 0 BOX 3721• SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 992209 (509) 489 0500 June 26, 1979 Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Street Spokarte, WA 99201 Attn: Mr. Wally Hubbard Plat Name Pondra. Pines lst Addition Address and Legal Description N. 500' of the S. 1212' of GovTt. Lot 6 Laying E. of Ponderosa Acres - 2nd Addition except the W. 2201. The developer representing the above described proposed plat located in our water service area # 2 is .negotiating with The Washington Water Power Company to provide domestic water service and fire protection in this development. The Washington Water Power Company will consider these negotiations null and void if contractual arrangements are not completed within o.ne year from the date of tlzis letter. ~ Sincerely, R E C E V E i l R JUN 2 7 1979 epresentative SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 5 E R V I N G T H E I N L A N D E M D I R E 0 F W A S H I N G T 0 N A N D I D/1 H 0 • A , I t r ~ - t No. "?'9 0961 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ~ ~►fs~~ ~ i ~ ~ ~~~R OF F ~~IW% + FUX ~T OF POHMA PIN4.v~ ~~~~IO14 FrOCATED IF'S ~ SECT~~ $0, YOWNSHIP 24h,, ROU 114 E.W M. ~ R E S 0 L U T I 0 N ~POL~~ Cum. ~~IMTON ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, , that the final plat of • ~~~ION B"im~~ a po&t on the 9 line ~f Gwt, LQt 6 712 ft. ~ of ~ ~L cormw tbwwf ~ th. '~~y em a 1'3~ ~ral1~l wyth ~he S line v# sold Lot 6, ~ a poist 220 ft« ~ of ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f Pow%rasat Aer*% 2nd Addl~ ~ ~s per plat tb~ nwrdad in Bok 8 of p~ats,, page Il, !h. kly. ~ a line p~~~~~~l w# th said E line of ~~~~rs" Acms 2nd 1~~~~~~ a d'~~UnCe of WO ft #h, ftx parol'~~l with the Slia~of WdLot 6. to the E line ef soldLot f th. SIY along said~line& 4f~~~~ ~f SM ft• to the ►08* l~~~ ~n SeCtiYn So 1OWSbip R~~o Rioge 44 E.WsRA t SpokoNa Cootyv WW~~ing Wnr more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. f~t BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RAY W. CHRISTENSEN, NNl. JMY C. KOPEt HARRY M. lARNED ATTEST: . VERNON HLAND e the Bo , By• • Deputy z L . . 7. . _ - - T «m~r .:..-1,~_...... . :i. ` ' , t r "1N Al. PLJ1? Cll~:CK LiST v • , D , 1. t'iiial N14st Lvroyud CK ~ 2. SuUdiv,siun iidiilu v 3. Scoiion, town-shtN 6 ran(ju 0 K 9. spollsor(5) ficitt►u (s) OK ~ 5. Eisqindor or sucvtjyor 6. Sheet sizd 29" X 36" 0~ ; 7. North Nolnt, scalu {100' - 1" or 200' -1") ~ 8. Boundery Line . ~ ~ , 9. Locatton 6 widths of proposed streets, alleys, ctghte d~ , of way, easements, parks, open spaces, 6 pcoper labeiing of spacas to be dedicated to the publlc lU . Layout 6 nanktss of adjotning Bubdivislons a. Keplats - l.dyout 6 Name of the replat ~ shall be uhown by dashed 11nes ~ . , 11 . Street mdmes - cunsrsler►t with exlsting streeta ,n city aaid county. Check agatnst name s on raund ridme whdet. ~ 12.• Lot slzes - i.e., 80' X125' wlth 10,000 sQ. tt. foc 8ingle tamii y lot Cul De Sdcy - 80' at butldhny line _ 1J. Layout, number5, and din►en5tons oi iots b parcel s 19. Necessary eny„►ec:riny ddta 15. Doea ded,c;atior► 5tdtc if liullvidual wdtdr anci/or ~ publtc sewers will Ue Nrovideci in ac;cordance With prel/niinary plat of apNroval. lb. Notartzecl cortiftcatiun by a protesbivndl land yurveyor. 17. Prtvatd rubtricttons, tt aily 18. NuinWr dnci tyNa ut units 19. Dddtcatic,n ot straets to the Nubltc ~ Wate ~ ?&rJ lU . Cd5ement vcitliccition 6 lllustrot►on power ~ V41, 11 Gheck easdiiiuiits, clouds on Nroperty. ,etc . J< trom Title RuNoit 04-11 ~ _ ~t~d'd't.._ 0 ----,r- ~ . f ~ wwP 3115 REV 8 13 " - •:s.- - I .r.-. .'-r. . , • .e ~ `r. . . _ THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY ~ Y L; - [~il ~'~~ti-t~. cin(l ]~nt t~rul Cwas Sri-i'lc-C . P 0 BOX 3727~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220•(509) 489 0500 a June 26, 1979 , ~ Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Street Spo}<are, WA 99201 Attn: Mr. Wall.y Hubbard Pl a t N ame Pondra Pines lst Addit3on 1lddress and Legal UESCription ~ N. 500' of the S. 1212' of Gov't. Lot 6 ~ Laying E. of Ponderosa Aeres - 2nd ~ . Add3tian exQepfi the W. 2201. , ~ ~ The developer represenL-ing the above described proposed plat ].ocated in our water service area # 2 is negotiating with The Washa.ngtoii Water Power Company to provide domestic water ~ service and fire protectian in this dcvelopment. ' The Washington Water Power Company wi.lt consider these { negotiations null and voad if contraetual arrangements are not completed within one year from the clate of t}ia.s letter. , ~ Sincere.l.y, . ~ r a Builder Repreeentative I ~ ~ 5 E R V 1 N G T H E I N L A N D E M 7 I R E 0 f W A S H I N G T 0 N A N D I D A N 0 ~ sTnr~ ~ STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Q_ z WASHINGTON o f,, n, p,a, Wash r n g t o n 9 8 5 U 4 2 0 6 ~ 753- 2 s o o ~ oy LxLee Ra y'~ 1889 ~ y y ouernor . T0: FROM. ~ The Washington State Department of Ecology headquarters office (Olympia) has received and recorded the following "Notice of Action Taken" pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. This notice is now on file and available for review upon request. ~ Acting agency: Type of action ta ken: . . ~ Proj ect : Date rece i ved : DOE file number: tA - ~ This letter indicates only filing of the notice of action with the Department of Ecology. It does not indicate concurrence with the format or contents of the notice, or compliance with all provisions of RCW 43.21C.080. If you have any questions, please contact the Environmental Review Section, (206) 753-6892. ; , ECY 010-4-50 Rev. 6/78 aEM* 3 ~ ' County File # 6`E-1178- ~ Sec. 5 R'g- T'sh'p - NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE SPOKAN E COU NTY RoARn QF C:nMMTS TnNFRS PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE SPOKANE COUNTY $OARD 0F COMMISIONERS DID ON 7-13'7$ TAKE THE ACTfON DESCRIBED BELOW. ANY ACT14N TO SET AS1DE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRO- VtS10NS QF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW. (STATE ENVI RONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED ON 7 / 13 / 79 (30 days from date of 2nd news- paper publication) OR BE BARRED. THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE SPOKAfdE COUN1'Y BOARD OF COIIMISSIONERS NOTICE OF WHICH IS HEREBY GIVEN, 4VAS AS FOLL4WS: (1) APPROVED ACTION: PRELIMINARY PLAT APPRQVAL PE-1178-78 PONDRA ?TNES FIRST (2) DESCRIPTION: SUBDIVISION OF 4 ACRES INTO 8 LOTS ADDITION FOR S INGLE FAMILY USE. (3) SUCH ACTION PERTAINED TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS AND/OR DESCR I BED AS (street address per general location ) : - ADJACENT TO AND WEST OF VAN MARTER ROAD; AND SOUTH OF 44TH AVENUE (4) PERTINENT DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING NORMAL COtJNTY BUSINESS H4URS AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKAN E, WASH I NGTON, 99260 PHON E: (509) 456-2205 NOTICE GIVEN BY: wOLFLAND, INC. FILED BY: NAME: F.V. SEIPP T1TLE: PRESIDENT 5 I G N AT U R E_~Z~ r Revised 4/17/79 ~ r AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION sTaTE oF weaHuvaroN, (,Ol'NTY OF 8P08_ANE, , J=••C.-•- , being firat dnly sworn - woncE oF AetI SrOKANE COVNTY IIoNOARDb str ~iF - on oath dorc►ses and s$vs that he ia the ~-g~{~ . COMMISSIONERS of the 8POKAN E VA LLEY H ERA LD, a c~ee~!'Tf~aper. That said newa- Pursuant 4•21t RCwto tne prav'sJprn p} CA e► , notite rs na~repy y;y~ paper is a legal netiti•spaper and it i~ nc~w~ and hae been for more than siz °~ar ~ S~*an# COuhfY BOwd o/ Cpmmis month4 prior to the dAte of the publicat.ion hereinufter referred to. publishe(l sb~er~ tl(d a, JuiY 13, 197e rake me in the EnQlish lunQuaRe continually aq a weekls newepa~r in Stwkane CountS•. "°O°~~~~i^~ nvf~e' . Aor6COme w'i: «'ashinRtun, and it is now and durinR all of asid time vvas printeci in an offi(x ct►a►lienqc such action on 1tK prouncis of non tomDlLsnce wlth ►1►e 0►ov1510ns ot n ia;ritained at the aforoeaid place of publication of said newspaper, which Chr►e► 43.21t acw rstate En,,;w. "¢aid new~apaper has been approved ae a legal newapeper by order of t.he 8u- on~u Y ii~i`v~OA o~a ~~i.°aCOrh d,bo perior Cr►nrt of tho Stata ot Wushington in and for Bpo1u►ne Connty. That the tnd ndwspepK pybllNtlon) of Dt Thep-Atfi0n taken by fhe SDoMaM covnty eaaro ot Commisaione", noi« OfwhiCh it htreby plvM, was as a,onezed is 8 ttue COpy of a ................~~~Qt..o~ rorian, (l) Approrr4 ACtiOn Preliminery Plei At~ovst PE 1179.7a oondra p~nes FIRf ~6qHiOR 0nvlpt4n. Subdivis4on of 4 acres . . - - . tn+o e iora for ,ir,y,e r.mn vs.. sa it arns publiehed in reRular iReuea (nnd not ia Bupplemvnt form), ot ssid (3) SUtn Atfipn pertiir iQ prooorly CMnnMnly known SS and•or atKribat 8! ~ai•ce„t to •nd wr,► w van nn,rter ' secntive Rps~1• ana iovth pl 41tn Avenw no,~siyaPer ance each week far s~ penod of .............ty0. con (4) Pt►tlnMi documants mSy b! dw1++0 normal county hs;- w ~~!+°"rs .t ►ne soa~ane ca„nrr weekA, eommencinR oa of Street~ Sp ~p j+neR~With nplo,n 99j~Q PffoM: tSQO} AS6 22Q5. Fiol~d eG~v~n~ySe,p01/1 ~idMMt. aDd sndinQ on the------}.~}~~ day o[....... 19_ - both datPa inclusive, 'l~~T'that suc-h newspaper wpwularlti• distributed 40 ite *~ubscriLerr duri all nf sai riai. 13nbecri d tiWOrn to betore me thu. 1.3ti d+►y ot . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19. otnn• Yublic in and tor ttie Siate ot shington, ReRiding at: Spokane, WA w Cott.Tl-LSr F1].e ~E-1178-7rr PG~/~•4 P/NES / St ~1 Db. Ser.-.,:;- R z4z T r Ship yq XFrIDAVIT 4F PflS2=IVG ST-A`I'E aF WASHrNCTON ) ) S.S. COUN'TY OF S POP.:-v'F ) ~otFC,qnlD II+IP. v, s~',oP Pe~,c~~rr bping fi~-st dt.il;, . sworn on ozch, depvses and saps; That I am a ci-tizea of the tJnited States of -America, and a resideat residenL• of the State of «ashiragton avzr C,he age of 18 pears. - z That on the 70. day of Jwj C 19 79, personally posCed one (1) or inor~ tULte and correct copies of the hereto attached and in,corpo rated hprbin by ceFereace :OTxCE Vp ACTI0?; in a conspi- cuous cnanner on the property, az as di?'eCC?Cl by the 1'lanning DepaYrme:Lt, wha,ch is the suUjeet oi the AGTIOi'i, to wit., the fallofazzng location-s: . ~-rµ + 1/ 14 n/ MJ4 zr,5Je l/aI/ 0~'? L v c.c.~ 46~ 3. 4. 4 / DATED Lhis ~ T dav oi 19 • SUBSCRIBEll and SWOR?v to hef o re me this day o r ~ 19 ti~at~.r" ~ubl?c -tn aftd fo°r the ~tate of Washinstaa; rvs!dino at 15pukane P,ev : 4/ 17I 79 ~r . v I L I k r PLANNING DEPARTMENT BR17Af}WAY CENTRF Bl11LF71NG N. 721 }€FFERS{}N STREET ~ PHOhlE 456-2205 r A , r ' SPOKAFIE, WASNINGTON 992E0 ~ ,_x_. SF4~anE GnUrvrr C01JRr r+OUSE Aprll 25, 1979 Wolfland, Inc. South 717 Pines Spokane, WA 99206 RE: PE-1178-78, Pondra Pines 1st Adctition r Gentlemen: Our fifes ind3cate thtat the conditional appror+al on your preliminary plat, knawn as Pondra Pines lst Adc#ition, wiil expire on July 1, 1979. The Hearing Examiner Cornrnittee must consider and approve, in a public hearing, an applicatian far an Extension of Time if your preMiminary p4at is to remain active. The Gommittee may attach additional conditions ta the plat during the Rublic hearing. In order to pracess an Extension af Time, we request that yau complete #he attached form and return it no Iater~ than May 75i 1979. A fee of $30.00, ~ayable to the Spakane County Treasurer, rrtiust accompany yvur application ta cover the cost vf the pukalic hearing. If or the department can be of any help to you, piea5e feel free to contact u s . Sincereiy, Doreen Johnsvn Piat Secretary Enclosure DJ/Ijv ~ I Pacific Northwest Bell February 20, 1979 Spokane County Planning Commission North 721 ,Tefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Sir: Pacific iVorthwest Bell will not require utility easements within the Plat of Pondra Pines 1st Addition. G. D. Fleming Right-of-Way Agent North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 99202 GDF:bh cc: Clarence E. Simpson Engineer, Inc. R ECEIVED i=ta 22 1919 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTNIENT I Attached is a copy of a transcript prepared by the Board. I believe that we can use the same format; however I would like you to prepare also an index of all the papers that were admitted at the hearing as well as an index of the transcript. If you have any qeestions please contactm me. 1 0 f r Y qaz~ . l L .1) . . N S ~ n ~r caQ. a ~ • 3 ~ ~ . Y;Ccnl~ ~ L•~`1~" ~ • • Ur ~ . ~ • ~ ~1 . : i 11 ~ 79 ~ ~ _ 0, 4 9 ~ e ~ ~ First American Title Company of Spokane MAIN aFFrCE EScRoW oFFrCE Y17est 704 Farst Avenue 2Vvrth $611 ,Davasion •Sacite B ~po~ane, Washcngton 99204 Drde r No.20473 5pokan.e, Washington 99208 Fh.one: (509) 456-0550 ccs : Simpson Engineers Phone: (509) 484-160t) 5pokane Ca. P lanrYing Dept. Spokane Co. Engineer' s Of f ice PLAT CERaI'IE'ICATE Proposed ~lat of Pandra Pines lst Adc3ition. TO: Vince Seipp E C E cf o Walflandf Inc. S. 717 Fines Spakane, WA G T'u Gentlemen : SPOKANE COUNTY - ALANNIPIG DEPARTNIENT This is a certzficate as Of July 7 r 1978 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the fa 1 lowa.ng property. That portion of Government Lot 6 in Section 5, Tawnship 24 North, Range 44 E.W.M., in Spokane County, Washington. Described as f ol lows ; Beginning at a pvint on the East line of Government Lat 6, 712 feet North of the Southeast corner thereof; thence T~~~~erly, on a line parailel with the South line of said Lot 6. ta a point 220 feet East of the East line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Boak S of plats, page 51; thence Northerly, on a line parallel with said East line af Ponderosa Acres 2nd Additian a distance of 500 feet; thence Easterly, parallel with the Sauth line of said Lot 6, to the East line ~ of said Lot 5 ; thence Sc~~therly, along said East line, a distance ~ of 500 feet to the Paint of Beginning. This company certifies that record title is vested in G+TOLFLAND INC, ~ AWASHINGTDN CaRPaRATzaN, free from all liens r encurnbrances and objections, except as fallvws: 1• GENERCSL TC111ES. Year: ~~~8 ATClol.lll t: $22. 54, Ta aS t 11 a~ f Tax Account No. ; 05441-9110 ~ *CONTINUED* ,4ffifrated wzlh Ftrsi Arnerrcan Trr1e Irasurrrnce Cornpany r ~ P age 2 No. 20473 2. PRELSMINARY ESTIMP►TED ASSESSMENT : County of; Spokane Estimated Arnount: $8,105,49 Improvernent: Road Local Improvement District No.: R-287 The lien of said Assessment f as betweezx Grantor and Grantee or Seller or Purchaser, attached (attaches ) thirty daYs after said filing date. This cnmpany further certi fi~s that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeabIe have been fully paid except as noted above. F"IRST AMERICAN TI'I'LE INSURANCE CONlFAI4Y _ r - itle officer - i Larry D. Dunston L D/s b 4 ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - f, _ ~ - F ` ----r° =;'1 ' • { : . ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ 07-2 9.04`4c~ ' l 1'-1 ~ t _ r J ~ ~ 7 , ~ C. Or C7~ . ~ ~ x ~ ~ , ~ ~ 172 •r 7 r ~ ~ { s ~~2 t%+ ~ 0 ~ ~ - ~ CR ~Y ~ . ■ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~Oh'~~ .Pa~ ~ r`~ C~~ . ~ + ~P43 + r t r 31 • ~ ~ F ~ K ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~+v.~ ~ i : a • tiI , ~ `"4 1, t y } ~ e~~ 5' ► ~ Y ~ L.' \ ` • " _ } ~ ' + ~ ~ r r ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ , f• r G~ ~ ~lxl ~0~~~ ~ f T ~ L a 0. Ac. / 4~ r ~ P ~ i f~ ~ N0. 78 47C} BEF'ORE THE BQ#RD OF COIINTY GOM+IISSION'ERa 4F SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. IN THE AlA7.'TER OF THE RECOM14ENDAT IDNS ~ I FROM THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING C(]MMISSYON ~ ' CCNCMINQr THE GOM+IIS~SIONIS AGENDA, DATIP ~ RF.SDLUT~0N ' . MARCH 30. 1978 WHE~'~S, the Board of County Cvmmissroraers of Spakaue County, pursuant ta the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620, shall upnn receipt of any recommended official control or amen+iment there,to *at its psxt regul.ar public meeting set the date for apublic meeting ub~re 3t'may, by ordinance, adopt or reject the o£ficial contral or a.mendment t and WHE31FAS, the Board of Caunty Commi$sioners of Spokane Cotxnty, did by Reaalution Na. 78 433 acknowledge receipt af the rrcommendations from the Spoka.ne County Planning Commission cancerning its Agenda, dated March 30, '1978; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Gounty Cammissioners of Spokane County, did by sa-id I`e60lUt14n set this 13tin day of April to coneider the recomEnendatiorxs of the P1e.nning Gommission concerning it6 MaLreh 30, 1978 ageada, a capy of said recommendations are attached hereto and incorporated herein by r+eference. NOW, THEREFQRE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Count,y Commissivaers of Spaluane Cownty, Washington, that based upon the infarnatinn available to the Board and a the test2mony at this meeting the following action was ta,ken: , i . 1. P'E-108 ~ SWIAN A+GFE.i REPLAT SWAPi 7E- ~ AjRICULTQRAL SUBURBAN TQ SINGLE FAAf ILY RE3IDEI+ITIAL mhe Board cancurred with the Plannlng Cammission's recomnendation to apprnue the extenaion of time 4 2. PE-'I 0gp-77 - FOREST ORIMN SITBDIVISTON REFiAT #''4 : WARD ZE- 50-Z7 - UaCLASs~FT-ED To AGRIcr~~~L SUBURUx The Board concurred with the Plaxumng Commission' s recamuneadatian to I approve the extenoion of txme. 3- PE-1 "i~+'~'~ - NDRTI~fOOD ~D ADT~I~ O+l : ANDERSDN .j7E- 1 - AGRICt,TLTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a communicatian in dieagreement with the Pl.anning~omm sion*a recommendation for appravarl, the Board set a date of . at A a furthg'r cox~sic~er the mai~ter. a f s d c~ay ~ 4. PiJ-1155T77 ~ ~ORTH'.VV~ 3RD ADi3IlItilaw • G1117i~~NG ZE- ~ ~ AGR#kJnTURAL TO SINL#E i'ii13IF-Li RESIDE.ATIAL Ha,ving recexved acommwaication in disagreement with t e Planr~x gCamn ssianrs recommendation far approval, the Board set a date of ~ ~,t of said day ta furt~ 1-1/1 r car~sider tY~e matter. -5. PE-9 1bL73- - KII~ILOP~ ~RST ADIIITION : MIDI~.,OMEI ~1C.y ZE- AGRICuLTuRAL TO-SIN&E FAMII.Y RESIDJUL~L The Board concurred with the Planning CommissiQa' s recommendatron to ccantiaue this preliminax`y plat tv a later date. . PE=1'!' '1~2~ 8-~ NIYCA PARK : C. FRITZ N~SOI~ ZE ~ AGRTCULTU'RAL T4 SIl►IGLE FAMILY RESZDENTT.AL ANI],~OR MULTIPLE FAMTLY ST7B'C.dR2AN Hsving received acommutxication in dioagreement with te PlsnrY3ng Conu.mission's recommendatian far aFPrvval, the Board set a date of ' ~~~X at ~ e A'0' af eaid day to furt r cansider the matter. L A 9 ' • 7. PE-1161-77 - SUNSET MEADOWS SUBDIVISION : SWANSON C/0 GREIINWOOD REALTY ZE- 203-?7 - AGRICULTURAL TO SIHGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concur•r•ed wi th ttie Planriing Commission' s recotnmendation to deny the preliminary plat without prejudice. 8. PE-1170-78 - COLUMBIA PARK 1 ST ADDITION : BONUCCELLI ZE- 15-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINCjLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a cornmunicatxon in disagreement with the Planning Cotnmission's. recommendation for continuance, the Board set a date of ♦j,l /9~~ 1 . ~ of said day to furt%~h E~~ at ~,DC coasi der the matter. 9. PE-1178-78 - PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION: WOLFLANDI INC. ZE- 4~-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBUR'BAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY ~ RESIDIIJ TIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to continue this preliminary plat to a later date. 10. PE-1179-78 - N(1RTHCREST ADDITION: WOLFLAND, INC. ZE- 44-76 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAPqILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to continue this preliminary plat to a later date. 11. PE-1180-78 - ANCHOR SECURITIES AIO. 5, REPLAT #1: PIONEER HCMES? INC. ZE- 45-725 - AGRICULT[TRAL TO AGRICUL7.'DRAL SUBURBAN The Board concur•red with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Planning Commissa.on's recommendation to zone the prperty to the Agrlcultural Suburban zonre upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. 12. PE-1181-?8 - VERA VIEW ESTATES : MC MILLAN ZE- 46-76 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAA'iILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a communication 1n disagreement with the Plen,zung Commission's recommendation for denial, tYie Board set a date of at 1'~ ~ m of said day to fur~~ger consider the matter. 13. PE-1182-78 - CASCADE HEIGHTS ADDITION: MC CLOSKEY ZE- 47-78 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MiTLTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to continue this preliminary plat to a later date. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that tYie Board hereby authorizes its chairman to sign Final Declaration of Non-Significance for• each item approved above, subject to compliance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15•340• . BY THE ORDER OF THE BQARD THIS L1AY OF , 1978. B(aARD OF COUNTY CO+IMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY 9 WASIi INGTON NARRY M. I l(Ay W. CHRISTENSfB ATTEST: • KUPET VERNON W ANU ' Clerk -Ehe~ Boar BY : Dep ty / ~ IL •y ' NO. 78 646 BEFORE THE 60ARD OF COUNtY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. IN THE MATTER OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM ) THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ) CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S AGENDA, DATED ) RESOLUTION APRIL 28, 1978. ) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620; shall upon reCeipt of any recommended official control or amendment thereto, at its next regular public meeting set the date for a public meeting where it may bv ordinance, adopt or reject the official control or amendment; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Comnissioners of Spokane County, did by Resolution No. 78 620 acknowledge receipt of the recommendations from the Spokane County Planning Commission concerning its Agenda, dated April 28, 1978, and, WHEREAS, the 6oard of County Comnissioners of Spokane County, did by said res- o?ution set this 18th day of May to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission concerning its April 28, 19781, 1978 agenda, a copy of said recommendations are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the 8oard of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that based upon the information available to the Board and the testimony at this meeting the following action was taken: 1. PC-1180-78 - ANCHOR SECURITIES SUBDIVISION N0. 59 REPLAT #1: PIONEER HOMES, INC. ZE- 45-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBUR6AN The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's'recommendati'on to approve the change in condition of the preliminary plat, subject to the condi'tions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission°s hearing with con- sideration of the environmental review. 2. PS-1165-77 - EWELL SUBDIVISION: EWELL S- =0- - A-QICULTURAL SUBURBAN fFS I NGLE FAMI LY RES I DENT IAL AND TWO FAMI LY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Comnission's recommendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of • the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the einvironment.a' re- view. The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recomnendation to zone the property to the Single Family Residential zone classification and Two Family Residential Zone Classification upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the F~lina . of the final plat. 3. PE-1178-78 - PONDRA PINES FIRST AODITION: WOLFLAND INC. ZE- 43-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND/UR SINGLt FAMILY RESIDENTL"►: Having received a comnunication in disagreement with th'a Planning Conmission's recommendation for denial, the Board set a date of ~/a", at ~,'DO f?~, of sai d day to further co i der the matter. 4. PE-11$2-78 - CASCADE HEIGHTS ADDITION: MC CLOSKEY ZE- 47-78 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN. The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to continue , this preliminary plat to the May Agenda. 5.- PE=1188-78 - PACE ADDITION: MYERS ZE-, 58-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 4aving received a corrnnunication in disagreement with th lanning Comnissior.'-c recommendation, for approval, the Board set adate of dt 3~ p7~• Of ~d~ ~~dy t0 fUr~~Ar consider :`iL ~'2~ _er. . . `•i 1~;`- ~ • s w , ! 6. PE-1183-78 - MISSION VILLA ADDITION: DAHLQUIST ZE- 48-78 -AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MUBILE HOME The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recomnendation to continue the preliminary plat to the May Agenda. 7. PE-1186-78 - PELLEY'S ADDITION REVISED: NOLL ZE- 56-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the min4tes of the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. . The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to zone the property to the Agricultural Suburban zone upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. 8. PN-1189-78 - NORTH PARK INDUSTRIAL ADDITION: MC CORMACK ZN- 59-78 - MANUFACTURING TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL ' Having received a communication in disagreement with th Planning CorrmiSSion's recommendation for approval, the Board set a date of .?o?, 11P7,? at Gp . of sai d day to further consi de the matter. 9. PE-1190-78 - POOCHIES ADDITION: NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND ASSOC., INC. ZE- 60-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a comnunication in disagreement with e lanning Corrmission's recorrmendati on for deni al , the Board set a date of G" /~7~' at /,',~,of said day to further consid t matter. 10. PN-1191-78 - NORTH PINE ACRES ADDITION: R.Y.C.O. COMPANY ZN- 61-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN Naving received a communication in disagreement with e P]anning Comnission's recommendation for denial, the Board set a date of /i 197e at of said day to further consid the matter. 11. PUDE-1-77 - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: RAYNOR PE-1192-78 - THE MEADOWS: RAYNOR Having received a communication in disagreement with P anning Commission's recommendation for denial, the Board set a date of at ,~j; GC~ P)92 of sa i d day to further co de the matter. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby authorizes its chairman to sign Final Declarations of Non-Significance for each item approved above, subject to eompliance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15.340. BY THE OROER OF THE BOARD THIS If DAY OF 4' , 1978• BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST: VERNO~I . OHLAND Clerk the Boa(d B Y : eputy f . , . t _ 78 950 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, PE-1178-78, PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION: ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN and/or SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did, after public hearing on April 28, 1978, forward to the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation that the preliminary plat to be known as Pondra Pines lst Addition (File Number PE-1178-78) be denied without prejudice; and WHEREAS, the sponsor, Wolfland, Inc., South 717 P'ines Road, Spokane, Wash- ington, did request a special hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and testimony against the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the above-described preliminary plat and zone reclassification; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did hold a public hearing on June 15, 1978, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and testimony and request of the plat sponsor, objectors, and other interested parties; and WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above-described preliminary plat proposal and zone reclassification, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the testimony given, the records and minutes of the Planning Commission, the environmental checklist, and all other evidence presented, and further having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the conclusions of the Planning Commission were generally not valid and sufficient; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the preliminary plat to be known as Pondra Pines lst Addition and zone reclassification upgrading to Agricultural Suburban should be and hereby is approved, subject to the Staff Findings and Conditions; and the Board concurs in the Planning Staff recommenda- tions that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result and a Declaration of Non-Significance be issued. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1978. BOARD 0F COUNTY 40?MMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON HaRRY M. LARNED, CwM, . JERRY C. KOPET ATTEST: VERNON .~'HLAND C er Board By : //78 ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASNINGTON. FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION, PE-1178-78, PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION: ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN and/or SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did, after public hearing on April 28, 1978, forward to the Board of County Commissioners a recomrnendation that the preliminary plat to be known as Pondra Pines lst Addition (File Number PE-1178-78) be denied without prejudice; and WHEREAS, the sponsor, Wolfland, Inc., South 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Wash- ington, did request a special hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and testimony against the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the above-described preliminary plat and zone reclassification; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did hold a public hearing on June 15, 1978, to consider the recommendations of the Planning Corranission and testimony and request of the plat sponsor, objectors, and other interested parties; and WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above-described preliminary plat proposal and zone reclassification, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the testimony given, the records and minutes of the Planning Commission, the environmental checklist, and all other evidence presented, and further having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the conclusions of the Planning Commission were generally not valid and sufficient; and NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the preliminary plat to be known as Pondra Pines lst Addition and zone reclassification upgrading to Agricultural Suburban should be and hereby is approved, subject to the Staff Findings and Conditions; and the Board concurs in the Planning Staff recommenda- tions that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result and a Declaration of Non-Significance be issued. DATED THIS DAY OF , 1978. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ I ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND Y. Clerk of Board ~ B i/ 78 ~ - BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ) AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION, PE-1178-78, PONDRA PIVES ) 1ST ADDITION - ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICUL- ) COPIMISSIONERS' DECISION TURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ) Sponsor: Wolfland, Inc. ) This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, to render its decision concerning the request of Wolfland, Inc., South 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Wasiiington 99206 for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading; and - The Bdard having received the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission to deny, vrithout prejudice, said application, as set forth in the Planning Commission minutes dated April 28, 1978; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on June 15, 1978, at the request of the Sponsor, Wolfland, Inc., and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to aporove said application as requested, subject to Staff Findings and Conditions. The Board also concurred in the Planning Staff's recommendation that no significant adverse impacts will result and a Declaration of Non-Significance be issued. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 22 day of June, 1978. VERNON W. OHLAND C1 er, k of the Bo rd bY : ~ ~/~~.C - ;~Y L•~. Ros#ne Montague, Deputy Clerk This decision was rendered by a majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners as follows: R ECEIVED Chrisdtense, aye_ Larneaye ' JUN w 71978 K pe na SPOKANE COUNTY _ -~r ? PIANHING DEPARTMENT Ro~~hne Montague,Depu y C er J / 1/7g . 9 ~ . ` --i BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION } AND ZONE CLASSIFICATION, PE-1178-78, PONDRA PINES ) 1ST ADDITION, ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, SPONSOR: ) WOLFLAND, INC. ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 3:00 P. M., on June 15, 1978, at their office in the County Courthouse to consider the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification on the following described property: Section 5, Township 24 North, Range 44, E. W. M. Beginning at a point,,on the E line of Government Lot 6, 712 feet North of the SE corner therof, thence Wly on a line parallel with the South line of said Lot 6, to a point 220 feet E of the E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Book 8 of plats, page 51; thence Nly, on a line parallel with said E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition a distance of 500 feetp thence Ely parallel with the S line of said Lot 6; to the E line of said Lot 6; thence Sly, along said East line, a distance of 500 feet to the PO6.(Approximately located South of 44th) NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony either for or against the application of the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 18th day of May, 1978. VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk of the Board ~ BY Ro,~anne Montague, Deputy Cler ~ • fILE =rd " - ~ a ~ k E JC/ to i- ~~TNRESHOLO OETERMINATION 49 /8 :._.t _C.,a _ EiA) (proposed/f ina1) qRrMENI '~V ~signiI~Sfi/cance/~nonsignificance Z 1. Description of Proposal : sQMvLS10AJ 0FA1/o4el(&~ ~ ~~07:S1 ,.r ~L. 5~~~~ ~m/l.Y DoadwNds -z,~AM44 &VAM *fir AZA 2. Proponent: ~ 0 1. F t ~ IAAC I 3. Contact Person: ~ Y. ~704#4 Phone:-90,~~ 4. County Action (s) Requested: -looo' Zone Change; _!.w Preliminary Plat Appraval: Final Plat Approval; Change of Condition Other• , I 5. Location of Proposdl: W . ~ AL&X• O'c yI/.* pw 6. lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY,WASHINGTON This proposal has been Qetermined to have a signtficant adverse imQact on the enviranment. An EIS is reauired under RCW 43.21C. 30 c. This decision was made after review by the County of a com- p eted environmental checklist and other information oA file with the lead agency. 1. Responsibie Official. Proposed Declaration: Final Oeclaration: Name-##Ray W~ A /V~ ~Jame ~~4)T►y ! p Signature S~ anature ~ N "~'Y,1' ~ Title i~~10?A#440 Title~~ l~ DeQartment . ~ ~ ~ . Department~ ~r IV. Date Gate - i Oepartmen Reference No. ~ t 1#4 AA 8. For Declarations of Significance Only: ECEI Oate af Expected Oraft EIS Availability (determined bv Responsible Official) VE Oate of Issuance JVL 17 1A78 ~ TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPOi~SIBLE OFFICIAL. S a. arief description and listing of those environmental impacts leading to such declaratton: p.~ ~KANE CQ~N ~'~-DfPqRT T Y MENT b. Brief explanation of what measures, if any, could be taken by the applicant to prevent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of nonsignificance: 706~~ 7ff ; 1 - • ' - „ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION N 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 May 8, 1978 r , Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House Spokane, Washington 99260 ' Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, April 28, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 11 :55 A.M., reconvening at 1:30 P.M. to 6:55 P.M. in the Health Building Auditorium Room 140. A continuation of that hearing was held on May 2, 1978, at 7:30 P.M. to 12:00 P.M. in the County Comarissioner's As6em- bly Room. The enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, Messrs. Main and. , Thomas. Mr. Thomas was not, however, present at the May 2, 1978 continuation ' hearing. Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Quigley were al so present. Planning Staff present: Dayharsh, Fergen, Bethards, Mosher;and Brumleve. Engineer's Office: Kennaly. Environmental Health Office: Anicetti. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio. Sincerely, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCNIIyIISSION Ted McCoury, Chairman ' Fred L. Dayharsh, Director of P'lanning FLD/sb ~ Official minutes and record of action taken by the SPokane County Planning APPIALED Commission at their regular hearing • held on April 28, 1978, and May 2, 1978. 7g - ~ 8 S J, 5. PE-1180-78, ANCHOR SECURITIES SUBDIVISION N0. 5, REPLAT #1: PIONEER HOMES, INC., and ZE-45-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURSAN: That the change in condition .proved, from 9 lots to 12 lots, on the previously approved preliminary plat be ap of Anchor Securities Subdivision No. 5, Replat #'I. 6. PS-1165-77, EWELL SUBDIVISION : EWELL and ZS-207-77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBA.Ai AND . TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be p a proved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, dated April 28, 1978. (Motion by Quigley, seconded by Kennedy. Vote was unanimous.) 7. PE-1178-78, PONDRA PINES FIRST ADDITION: WOLF'LANDS INC.9 and ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN and/or SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: To deny without ~ predjudice, as lot size was not consistant in thE area. (Motion by Rawlings, seconded by Kennedy. Vote was unanimous.) 8. PE-1182-78, CASCADE HEICzHTS ADDITION : MC CLOSKEY, anrd ZE-47-78, SIlVGLE FAMILY RFSIDIIVTIAL TO MULTIPI,E FAMILY SUBURBAN : This item is continued until the.May 1978 Planning Commission Heaxing, as there was an error in advertising. The P1anrLing Department wl.ll pay all readvertisement costs. 9. PE-1188-78, PACE ADDITION: MYERS, and ZE-58-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SZIVGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approvin,g adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, dated April 28, 1978; except that the following conditions shall be incorporated; That the plat be redesiqned to include a stub road connection to the south and west. (Motion by Quigley, seconded by Byrne. Vote was unanimous. Mr. Main abstained from hearing and voting on this item because of a conflict of interest.) 10. PE-1183-78, MISSION VILLA ADDITION: DAHLQUIST9 and ZE-48-78, AaRICULTURAL TO RESIDIIVTIAL MOBII,E HQNIE: This item is continued until the May 1978 Planning Commission Hearing, as there was an error in advertising. The Planning Department will pay all readvertisement costs. 11. PE-1186-78, PELLEY'S ADDITION REVISED: NOLL, and ZE-56-78, AGRICULT{JRAL TO AGRICULTtIRAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary plat reque st be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Coinmission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, dated April 2$, 1978. (Motion by Rawlings, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unaniarous.) 12. PN-1189-78, NORTH PARK 1NDUSTRIAL ADDITION: MC CORMACK, and ZN-59-78, MANUFACTURING TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL: That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, dated April 28, 1978; except that the following conditions shall be incorporated: That standard condition H-5 be included in the conditions, and al so that the preliminary plat go with the recommendation of a public sewer s,ystem. (Motlon by Byrne, seconded by Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.) 13. PE-1190-78, POOCHIES ADDITION: NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND ASSOC., INC.9 and ZE-60-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be denied because of being incompatible with lot sizes and uses on the street on which property is located. (Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous.) C • . ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION N 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 . May $ , 1978 Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House Spokane, Washingtvn 99260 Gentlemen: At the regtit7.ar hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, April 28, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 11:55 A.M., reconvening at 1:30 P.M. to 6:55 P.M. in the Health Building Auditorium Room 140. A continuation of that hearing was held on May 2, 19?8, at 7:30 P.M. to 12:00 P.M. in the County Commissioner's Assem- bly Room. The enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Members pre sent : Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, Messrs. Main and Thomas. Mr. Thomas was not, however, present at the May 2, 1978 continuation hearing. Mr. Kennedy and Mr. Quigley were also present. Pla.n.ning Staff present: Dayharsh, Fergen, Bethards, Mosher and Brumleveo Engineer's Office: Kennalyo Environmental Health Office: Anicetti. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio. Sincerely, SPOKANE COTJNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Ted McCoury, Chairtnan Fred L. Dayharsh, DireMctor of Planning FLD/sb Official minutes and record of action taken by the Spoka.ne County Planning Cornmission at their regular hearing held on April 28, 1978, and May Z, 1978. ~ • • ~ ~ 5• axi-1180-78, ANCHOR SECURITIES SDBDI`IISION N0. 5, REPLAT #'l : PIONEER HQMFLS I1VC. > > and ZE-45-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN : That the change in condi tion be approved, from 9 lots to 12 lots, on the previously approved preliminary plat of Anchor Securities Subdivision No. 5, Replat #1. 6. PS-1165-77, ELfELL SUBDIVIS ION : E1rJELL and ZS-207-77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND Z'TnTO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's iwo d e 281 1978. (Motion by Quigl.ey, seconded by Kennedy. Vote " - o L tro 7. P'E-1178-78, P4NDRA PIlN'ES FIRST ADDITION : WOLFLAND, INC., and ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBUR$AN and/or SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIA,L : To deny without r ~ predjudice, as lot size was not consistant in the area. (Motion by Rawlings, seconded by Kennedy. Vote was unanimous.) 8. PE-1182-78, CASCADE HEICHTS ADDITION: MC CLOSKEY, and ZE-47-78, SIlVGLE FAMILY ' RESIDFPtTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBIJRBAN: This ztem is continued until the May 1978 Planning Commission Hearing, as there was an error in advertising. The Planning Department will pay all readvertisement costs. 9. PE-1188-78, PACE ADDITION: MYERS, and ZE-58-78, AGRICULTURAL TO S:;IVGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findzngs, dated April 28, 1978; except that the followi.ng conditions shall be incorporated; That the plat be redesigned to include a stub road connection to the south and west. (Motion by Quigley, seconded by Byrne. Vote was unanimous. Mr. Main abstained from hearing and voting on this item because of a conflict of interest.) 10. PE-1183-78, MISSION VILLA ADDITION: DAUQUIST, and ZE-48-78, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDIIVTIAI, MOBILE IiCME: This item is continued un.til the May 1978 Planning Comtnission Hearing, as there was an error in advertising. The Planning Department will pay all readvertisement costs. 11. PE-1186-78 , PELLE'Y' S ADDITI ON RE'VISED ; NOLL, and ZE-56-78 9 AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary plat reque st be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Plarining Commission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings9 dated April 28, 1978. (Motion by Rawlings, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimouso) 12a PN-1189-78, NORTH PARK INDUSTRIAL ADDITION: MC CORMACK, and ZN-59-78, MANIIFACTIJRING TO RESTRICTED INDIISTRIAL: That the preliminary plat request be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, dated April 28, 19'?8; except that the following conditions sha11 be incorporated: That standard condition H-5 be included i.n the conditions, and also that the preliminary n13t go with the recommendation of apublic sewer s,ystem. (Motion by Byrne, seconded by Rawlings. Vote was unanimous.) 13. PE-1190-78, POOCHIF,S ADDIfiION : NORTHWEST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES AND ASS OC IlVC. 9 and ZE-60-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preli-minary plat request be denied because of being incompatible with lot sizes and uses on the street on which property is locatede (Niotion by Kennedy, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous.) ~ . • ..r ~ • 14, PN-1191-781 NORTH PINE ACRES ADDITION : RYCO COMPANY, and ZN-61-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICIILTURAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary plat request be denied without prejudice, (Motion to approve by Kennedy, seconded by Byrne. Motion failed with 2 yes votes and 3 no votes. Mro Main abstained from voting, because of a conflict of interest.) 15. PUDE-1-77, THE MEADOWS : RAYNOR, a.nd PE-1192-78 : Planned IIni.t Development : That this request be denied, among other lesser reasons, but mainly because of a feeling that the proposal was not generally "in harmony with the surrounding - area..." as delineated in 4.20.010 (b) of the Zoning Ordinance. (Motlon by Byrne to approve, seconded by Rawlingso Motion fai.led with 0 yes votes and 3 no votes. Mr..Main abstained from voting.) Planning staff present: Dayharsh, Fergen, Bethards, Mosher and Brumleve. Engineer's Ofiice: Kennaly. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio. Health District: Anicetti. DATED THIS 8TH DAY OF MAY, 1978. . BY: Stephanie Brumleve Recording Secretary FOR: Ted McCoury Planning Commission Chairman Fred L. Dayharsn Director of Planning If ~ f . ' ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ~ O R PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ~O f ~9 7~ ACTION TAKEIV APPROVE DENY CCONTINUE LE[VGTH OF CONTINUAIVCE REASONS 2. 3. 4. CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning Staff's Findings, Dated , and subject to the additional conditions that 1. 2. 3. VOTE Motion by . . Seconded by ~ VO TE YES N~ I I " ~+"1 NZJNCS-Apri1 28, 1978 YE-11'18--7? - I'ondra PiTies First Additi-on: VdolfZand, Tnc. 7sr- ~4-7e -!'--g7.'1. C:L1ltUral + o Ar► ic:u1tijr,~ Sul-urbari ancl/or Sjngl e Family Residential Y?F~,IPJ17I'?~1R`T 011T'~DIjIJ Si C~NJ At~?~ ~,f,~~1~; i?F'"I.f.,;.°I~~'I~;lt;`TC;1~`S StG-.f'f fi re; ngc xnt,al-a; r,!.r pT'-1 178-; e, Foodr., P; ne.- 1: t Addi tion: 11, GENERAL INFORMATION: A. Iyocation Pondra Pines lst Addition is situated in the south central area of the Spokane Valley in hn area commonly referred to as the Ponderosa. The plat is situated west of Van Marter Road and 300 ft. south of 44th Avenue. B. Proposal The applicant proposes to subdivide about 4 acres into 8 lots all for single family dwellings. The proposal would create a plat with a typical lot size of 1/2 acre per lot with a density of about 2 units per acre. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan I'Pondra Pines lst Addition is situated within an area that has been designated as being suitable for residential development by the approved map of the Comprehensive Plan. Within that Comprehensive Pian, however, no density designations have yet been made. D. Existing Land Uses The site is presently vacant with minor drainage drainage problems being evident. The properties that immediately surround this proposal have developed over the years into several single family residential subdivisions with the typical lot size within those subdivisions appearing to be 1 acre per lot. E. Compatibility with Existing Land U ses - The staff finds this proposal to be somewhat incompatible with the adjacent existing land uses in the area in that the adjacent uses have a typical lot size of one acre per lot whereas the proposal now before the Planning Commission calls for lot sizes of 1/2 acre per lot. However, the staff does find that within those subdivisions that surround the proposal now before the Planning Commission that animal keeping is not present and, in fact, the use proposed by the sponsor would be compatible with the uses now present in the area. .5- -7 s v 3 w " PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Addition _ (Con-inued) II . SPECLAL INFORMATION : A. Circulation The Engineers' Office has reviewed this preliminary plat proposal and their office finds that adequate County roads are available to serve this site, and secondly that the plot design is acceptable to our office. Their office does recommend, however, that as a condition of preliminary plat approval that all roads within the plat be paved and curbed to the specification of the Co unty Engineer. ~ B. Sewage Disposal The Health District has approved the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems for this proposal. The site is, however, situated near the Spokane Valley Aquifer where the Health District in their review of possible impacts upon ground water quality , has the following comments: .I • In the co urse of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) I n normal precipitation years s ubsurface di.sposal of sewage treatment effl-tuent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil ~ particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by pIlant routs" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicates that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration ex- pected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecase year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the n&tural back- ' ground. The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact cn groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. " II, Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 5.37 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result w 3 q , , PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Addition (Continued) in a range of 5. 83 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to l Oppm . III, Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics: (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. (2) Sealed systems, whether indiv fdual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Sbme, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Secondly, the Health District finds that because of a minor drainage problem existing on the site, that a drainage cover should be installed through the natural drainage course on the plat to provide for adequate sewage dfsposal. C. Water Supply The proposed subdivision is situated within the recorded service area of the Washington VlTater Power Co. That Company indfcates that it does have the ability to serve the site with both domestic and fire flows. D. Drainage The staff finds that because of the minor drainage problem existing on the site, that special techniques for storm water control may be required as a condition of plat approval. E. Fire Protection The proposed subdivision is situated in the boundaries of Fire Protection District No. 8. That District indicates that both mains and hydrants of sufficfent size for fire-protection facilities should be required as a condition of preliminary plat approval. F. Schools The proposed subdivision is situated within the boundaries of the Central Valley School District where the district's facilities in this area are currently reaching capacity levels. The district believes that this situation may be mitigated somewhat when their current building program is completed sometime wi thin the next few years. I ~ _ 3 B _ PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Addition. (Continued) G. Parks No improved County parks are situated within the immediate area and the Parks Department has no present plan for either site acquisition or major park improvements at this time. III. ZONING ANALYSIS: The staff finds that a zone reclassification to the Single Family Residential Zone cla s s ification from the Ag ric ultural zone cla s s ification wo uld be appropriate given the use and lot size proposed by the plat sponsor. The use, once again, is for single family dwellings with a typical lot size of about 1/2 acre per lot which would prohibit animal keeping. This zone reclassification to the single-family residential zone would be compatible with recent Planning Commission decisions in the area regarding plat proposals of a similar nature. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The staff has reviewed the Environmental Checklist submitted by the plat sponsor and the staff finds that no significant adverse environmental impacts would likely result from this proposal and a proposed Declaration of Non- Significance should be is sued . Slight adverse environmental impacts were however, noted under the following questions: Earth, air, water, flora, fauna, , noise, light and glare, natural resources, housing, land use, population, transportation, public service and utilitles. V. CONDITIONS: ' If approval is granted, the staff recommends the following conditions. I ~ Specific conditions applicable to this plat are referenced below and found in the attached supplement entitled, "Standard Conditions for approval of Preliminary Plats, August, 1977. NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed below. P-11 P-24? P-31 P-41 P-S, P-64, P-70 P-81 P-9 (April 1, 1979) P-138 E-10 E-21 E-31 E--41 E-5, E-61 A-11 H=10 H-5. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICt; OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCJVIt and the ' Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77 -1392 be accomplished by the pro ject applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners , , as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. ' That prior to the f iling of the final plat, the drainage plan be reviewed by the Spokane ~ County Health District That all roads within the plat be paved and curbed to the specifications of the County ' Engineers. That a11 roads providing direct lot access to lots withgra the preliminary plat • ~3C- PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Addition (Continued) proposal be paved and curbed to the specifications of the County Engineers. Upgrade all of Pondra Pines lst Addition to the Single Family Residential Zone classification upon the filing of the final plat. _3D- ~ AGENDA, APRIL 28, 1978 TELEPxoNE: 456-2274 SFOKANE COUNTY F'LANNING C(MMISSION Time: Friday, April 28, 1978, 8:30 A.M. Place: Health Di6trict Auditoriwn, Room 140 West 1101 College Avenue . ' A. 8:30 A.M. 1. 8eport on Commissioners Action I 2. 5-mile Prairie Goals & Guideliues 3. City-County Joint Work Program B. PRELIMINARY SUBDNISION, CHANGE IN CONDITION page 1. PE-1180-78 Anchor Securities Subdivision No. 5, Replat #1 Ze- 45-78 Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban PIONEER HQMES, IlVC. (KETO) 1 C. PRFLIMIlVARY SUBDNISIONS AND ZCNE RECLASSIFICATIONS 2. PS-1165-77 Ewell Subdivision ZS- 207-77 Agricultural Suburban to Single Family Residential and Two Family Residential , 2 ...............o.......................... 3. PE-1178-78 Pondra Pines 1st Addition „ ZE- 43-78 . Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and/or Single Family &O' Residential WQLFLAND' 1.NV•••••••.••••••• •e•• o• • ••*•o•• 3 + 4. P'E-1182-78 Cascade Heights Addition ' ?E- 47-78 Single Family Residential to Multiple Family Suburbaa - MC CLOSKEY ...........................e.........0 4 5- PE-1188-78 Pace Addition ZE- 58-7$ Agricultural to Single Family Residential ll L~L7 • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • s • • • • • • • 5 . 12:00 Noon- Lunch (Place to be announced at the hearing) D. 1:30 P.M. (or as soon after as possible) PRELIMINARY SUBDNI3IONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS . 6. P'E-'i 183-?8 Mission Villa'Addition - ZE- 48-78 Agricultural to Residential Mobile Home 1~A.SLQIIIST . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 PE-1186-78 Pelley' s Addition Revi sed ZE- 56-78 Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban NOLL ..............o............................. 7 8. PN-1189-78 North Park Industrial Addition ZN-:- , 59-?8 Manufacturing to Restricted Industrial MC CORMACK .............................e....e.o. 8 ~ dp &t" PE ~ . AGENDA, APRIL 28, 1978 SPOKANE COIINTY PLANNING COMMISSION TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 Time: Friday, April 28, 1978, 9:30 A.M. Place: County Health Department Auditorium, Room 140 West 1101 College PRELIlMIN,A.RY SIIBnNISIO 1Vn ONE CT.QSSTFTf'.ATTaN 3. PE-1178-78, Pondra Pines 1 st Addition ZE-43-76, ARricultural to Agricultural Suburban and/or SinRle Famil.y Residential a. Location: Section 5, Township 24 N., 8ange 44, E.W.M. Beginn.i'ng at a point, on the E line of Government Lot 6, 712 feet North of the SE corner thereof; thence Wly on a line parallel with the South line of said Lot 6, to a point 220 feet E of the E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Book 8 of plats, page 51; thence Nly, on a line parallel with said E line of Ponderosa Acres ?.nd Addition a dista.nce of 500 feet; thence Ely parallel with the S line of said Lot 6; to the E line of said Lot 6; thence Sly, along said East line, a distance of 500 feet to the POB. (Approximately located South of 44th and West of Van Marter.) b. Sponsor: Wolfland Inc. S. 717 Pine s Ro ad Spokane, WA 99206 c. Engineer: Richard L. Simpson N. 909 Argonne Spokane; WA 99206 d. Site Size: 4 acres . e. Number of lots: 8 f. Land IIse proposed by sponsor: Single Family Dwellings g. Ed.sting Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban and/or Single Family Res. i. Water Source: Washington Water Power j. School District: Central Valley ls. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site systems l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or aot this proposal will have a si gnificant adverse environmental impact. - - ~ ~ • ~ • T 4VIE N . • f ~ ~ _ • z ~ ~ 1 - ~ - ~ ~ - - - ~ . 4 • 3 a4 rr# AV a. POND EROSA ~ ,o , CSO ES. , - r 0 *7 r•r ^v ~ A r Q • ~L = 1 F 1 ~ . ~ j a ~ :a j - ~ . ~ s~r.-► , .av~' ~ 3 . w ~ • . , ~ ! . . SO Tv+ • . t • . ~i ` 7 0 . . ~ ~ ~ PE-1178-78 and ZE-43-78 In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Wolfland Inc., S. 717 Pines Road, ~,Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Pondra Pines 1st Addition. Also to ~ consider changing the Zoning Map from A gricultural to A gricultural Suburban and/or Single Family Residential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plats of such property. The property being platted is described as that portion of Government Lot 6 in Section 5, Township 24 North., Range 44, E.W.M. in Spokane County, Washington. Described as follows: Beginning at a point, on the East line of Government Lot 6, 712 feet N of the SE corner thereof; thence Wly on a line parallel with the S line of said Lot 6, to a point 220 feet E of the E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Additioni as per plat thereof recorded in Book 8 of plats, page 51; thence Nly on a line parallel with said E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition a distance of 500 feet; thence Ely, parallel with the S line of said Lot 6, to the East line of said Lot 6; thence Sly along said E line a distance of 500 feet to the POB. . (Approximately located South of 44th and West of Van Marter.) r _ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF V`JASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) , being first duly sworn on oath, 4., , deposays ; That I am a cttlzen of the Untted 5tates of Amertca, and a resldent of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. ~ That on the _k`_-day of I personally posted one (1) or more true and c rrect copies of '.he hereto attached and incorporateci hereln by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING in a conspicuous manner at each of ~ the following locatlons, to-wit: I I - 1. N-\)j ~ M t q6z Id-- 4. 9n1 T 'ID, 2. ~ T1) ~ yq « `L ~ V~j , I • t 3, ~ DATED THIS DAY OF 1 19 • ~ SIGNED ~ W Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Publtc in and for the StaLe of ` Washington, residilig at Spokane, Washingrol i l+ • ~ OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dota A~~ y Inter•offic• Commueication TQ PI.ANNING C4H4RSSI0N i Gl1RY KENNALY, PLANNING & TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER ~K-• _ . sub t R An co~tzt4.~ * ~ 9 ~ ~ l t 6 POODIZA PiMeS V A D ff, " ~*COHAITIONS CIRCLEU APPLY TO PLAT UNDEH CONSIDERATION , ~ that conditional approval of the plat is given eubjecr to dedication oF Right of lrlay to the pu5lic and appcoval of the Yoad systea► in the plat by the County► Engiaeax-~ . ~ that plans, proFiles, and cross sections shocriag propo9ed street centerlf.ae and curb grada-s be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to constructiron and the filing of a final p1at; . Q EC3 that _drainage plan9 and design calculatioos ehowing the grades and aligcmasnt of draie~a age rac i l i t ies be su b m i t te d to t he Coun ty Eng ineer for approva l p r ior [o coastruct ion and the filing of a ficul plat; . 4 cons truction wf thin the proposed public s treets and easemsnts shall be pergormed under tha direct aupervf9lon of a licensed land surveyor. Who ehall be reepvasi.ble for perpatuating all evidence of ths location of survey mvnumwnts which Raay be dis turbed during construction and who shall furniah tha County Engineer with "As .8uilt" plaas and a certificate in uriting that all improvemeats vare installed Co the lines and grades shovn on the 2pproved construction plans and thak 4L1], di4;turbea tnonu:nzctt9 have been replaced; (0-1 no cor►structfon aork is to be performed within the Public ~ight og ~Tay ur~tiY a pe~f~t ~h:s oeen issuad by the County Engineer. All work ie Bubject tv in9pectioa and approvi by the County_ En3ineer; ~ b all construction Within the Public Right of Uay is to be completed prior to filf.ng - the final plat or a bond in tha amount estimated by the County Eagineer to cov►er the ~ eost oi coa3truc[ion of improvzments, construction certification, "As Buil.t" plaa.s, and r;onw-nsnting the 9treet cen[erlines shall be filed with Che County En,giaaer. L 7-no direct ecceae from lots to 1/2 right of weys until such time as additional right of ways ere dediceted and roeds are established as County Roade. . c. S-no direct accese from lots to Stub Road connections until euch roads are construc[ed to County Standerds and eateblished as CounCy Roads. E 9-road dtsign, gnM 1~~ conatruction, and dreinage control for 1/2 rights of ways • and Stub Road connections are the reaponeibility of the Developec. E 10-thet the Sponeor shell prepare and submir to the County Engineer a desigrr proposel eccept- able to the State Highway Department af the propoaed State Highway-County Road inttr- section. S[ate Highwey Depertment approval of the propoaed design must be recefved prLor to the filing of the final plet. Improvements [o the State Highway are to be rhe reepon- sibility of [he Sponsor and may either he conetructed or a bond to cover the coat of such improvementa furniehed to the County Engineer in the amount ee de[ermined by the County Engineec and the Stete Highway Department. ~thet all roads within the Plat be curbec~ and~ paved to the specifications of the Co+~t~t~F Engineer. Existing County roacis providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and/or curbed to the standarris of the County Engineer. ~ ~ ~ , , . ~ ~ ~ ~ A~1~W~A, ,AF~~L ~~i 1~'~~i SP09~ANE Cfl11N'I`Y PLA,N~ITN~ ~~IISS]`~N '~LEFH~NE rd~}, ~ `11~~ i ~7'~dc`~.~ f ~~7'll ~C! ~ 1 ~ / ~ y 7 : ~V !1 F~~~'~: G~unty Heal~h l~epar~~me;~t A~a~ii~ariun ~ W~~t 11 ~'i Co~.l~~e Pi~.LiMTI~IA~Y ~1;~#I~~U~:,~I{~~I ND~hfE i';T,AS;T~FT~:h~'~'(1N ~ ~ ~ . ~-'117~-~$, P~n~~~ ~in~s '~,~t Ad~iz~~.an ~E-~4.~7~ A~y~~icul~u.r~. ~o A~ricul~ural ~u~~sban and/or Sin~1,~ F~m~l ~ a. Loca~ic~ra: Se~tion j, Tawnstia~~ N., R~~~ I~egitu~ir~~ a~ a p~i~t, ~n ~ liz~e I.ot '~'l~ fee~ ~~r~h ~f SE cor~er th~rec~f; th~nc~ ~y a witt~ ~he Sautl~ lir~~ c~f ~ai~d L~~ ~Q ~ po~.nt ~~~t E~~' the P~nd~ro~a Ac~~~ Addition ~s p~~ ~la~ t~er~~f r~~~rd~d in Br~c - ~1 ; thenc~ Nly, on ~ lir~~ paral~.el ~rith said E~a.ne c~f Pc~r~d ~n~ A~dc-lit~on ~ii.~~~n~c~ vf ~{7~} fee~; thence Ely parall.el w~.th th ~aic~ L~~ t~ th~ ~ l~.t~~ ~aid L~~ ~ } th~nce ~1~, ~~.id - a dist~nce o~ f~et ta tk~~ POB. {Approxima~ely :~aca~ted Sr~utl~ an~i W~s~ ai` ~Ia~•~,~r. ~ b~ Spon~~r: W~lfl~nd Inc, ~ S. ~17 Fine~ I~oad ~n~i.n~~r: kicl~arc~ Si~p~n ~ ~ ~~~l~€~~, '4~ ~9~f}6 N. 9Q~ Ar~~t~n~ S~ok~.e, WA ~42~ 8i~e Si~e: 4 ~cre~ _ ~ ~k1T4~~k" 4~ 1~~~: ~r f. ~and U~~ ~~u~aQS~d Y~y 5~aa~~r~r: ~in~~.~ ~am~~.y ➢w~lli~,~~ ~ g. Existin~; ~~ning: Ag~~~u~tur~1 h, P~~c~p~~~~ ~c~ning: A~;~ic~.ltura~ ~ut~u~t~an and~ar Sing~e i. 4~~ter S~~r•ce : 4J~~h i ngt~n W~ter Pow~r - ,j. Schoa~ ~i~tr~i.ct c i;~~n~~a~ Va1~ey k, M~th~~ of Scwag~ 1~;;~~ro~;~l.: it~~#~,vidraa~ ~n~~ite ~y~t~~is 1. ~nvirc~nm~r~ta1, ~m~a~t; ~ t~~i~: of di~c~a~~i~n ~t th~s hear~a - ~het~ier c~r rdc~l. t~i~ ~~~~~~~~r~ ~-,1 ~~i,1.1 }i~~v~~ v~ ~,i~,r~if~.~:<xrzt ~~~v~~s~ env ` I~1~ls~~' . . { . y ~ ; 4 ~ - • ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ' c ~ _ 1 4~.,.~~__~~_~ 1~ ~ ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ Y r~w~, ~~~~~~~J°~+~ q . ~ ~ ~ y: ► ~ ~ ~ ~ f 7 Tw ~ ~ ~ i . x ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ : ~ y> ~ ; ~~r~. 4rr~' ~ ' + ~ ~ ~ ~ ' - 5e~Tw ~ 'r~' ~ ' ' , , ~ FiORW 8+~6 ~ ~ I Q Z F Z~ A N T, I"C. : ~ S. 717 PINES ROAD . SPDKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 •(509) 928-4220 May 3, 1978 - ~LUL I VE D ~ MAY 4 1978 ~ ' COUNTY CONJMISSlONERS Spokane County Commissioners ' W. 1116 Broadway Spokane, Washington Dear S i r: ~D JF~ ~ ' We wish to appeal the zoning decision rendered on ZE 34-78 and PE-1178-78. We feel the rejection was unfair due to past zonings allowed in the general area. Sincerely, WOLFLAND, INC. ~ F. V. Seipp ~ President ~ • FVS/sh _ ECEIVED R . MAY Q 19 78 ~UIVE COUNTY DEPI~~ENT ' a~u ►~oor~t V . ALVIN J. WOLFF, INC. REALTORS _ Complete Real Estate Serwce - 1- I STATE OF WASH I NGTf ~ COMb118610N69 HERT COLE ~ OON ,L48 FRAS~i evPeAVMaR CQlvi.l.le, :yiA. 99114 , - Ju3y 109 1978 Spakme Ceunty Planniny Depai tment . 14orth 811 Jeff erson Spateane, bIh. 93201 Dear Sirs : r+Aaeott AaEA Ede have- reviewei the environmental checkl,ist- gor Project PE-1178-78 subiai.tted by W'al.f land Inc. and have E}►e followirtg cominent: le The proponent should address the q:aesfiion of forest slash abated ment, whach $houId be accemplisi'ei- c3ur-ing clearing ape~~tiU-ns: if xt is b31rned, a burning pexmit w311 be recauired o Thank you for the opportuni~y of revI~wing the e~ecklisto Very Leuly yaurs, BBRT L. COLE Commissioner caf. R'ka3..ic irids Bi~ll Boyes, at~.ons.~'areut~ Nlbrtheast , -ea - Bs.rt cc : Philip Hildebrand Ross- liesseltinP Jer ry Frobst ~ ~ I 11 E EID ( J . ~ KAHE ~H~ ` , SPO . ~IEN . v QIAN1OG OEPA 7 1 AN' EQUAL- 'OPPORTUNITY EMPL- OYER I - - ~ - S Count okane Py r Fivir Proteedon I~ist ic1~ l~o. r~ COMMISSIONERS OOINALD'L.. HUNT, Oistrict Chiei John F'GrBen/ee 292VE'Ost 57ih Ave., Sbokane, Weshington 99203 'M/chael~x Parria . JAMESNUGRAUE, District•Sscretary _ G8ry ReisOns 'Valleyford, Washfngton 99038 ' gpA1 27, 1978 Dire ctor ot Flaniag Spoka= Cvautty Plaani" Departtaent Idorth 832 Jeff'ersoa 3treet - - -S~, itashUgton =99203. i Des►r Sira Pbndra Pines let Addition (P&e1178-78) ia -vithin-b00 'feet ot ahydrant aa,d therefoxe no f`ire hyirant •will be reqnfred. ;,Siacerely yoW13; ..r. _ Joba Ho Di-f"teabach~r F`ire Prev+entioa ]3no Qhisf E C E 7 E APR 2 7,1975 SPOK,ANE- COU T~ENt PL~ANNtt~G DEPAR , PR:EVEl-'T FI1tESV SAVE LIVES, . r spoxArrE courrTY P:r.A+NING coMMzssioN N 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 April 4, 19?8 Honorable Board of County Commissioners ' Spokaae Couaty Court House Spokane, WA 99201 Geatlemea: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planaing Commissioa on Thursday, March 30, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 12:-30 P.M., reconveaing at 2:00 P.M. to 5:10 P.M. in the Eealth Buildiag Auditorium Room 140. The enclosed action was taken aad is recoatmended to the Boarai of Couaty Ccmmissioners. Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mr. Quigley, Mr. Thomas aad Mr. Kennedy. Planning Staff preseat:Dayharsh,8ethards,Fergem, Davis, Mosher, trtesche, and Brumleve. Eagineer's Office: Kennaly and Legat. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio. Sincerely, ° SPOKANE COUNTF PLA►NNING CMDMSION Ted McCoury, Chairmaa _ Fred L. Dayharsh, Director of PIag FLD/sb ° . • Official manutes aad record of action takea by the Spokaae County Pla~nning Commissioa at their regular hearing held oa Thursd.ay March 30, 1978. o , ~ . PE-ll 72- 79 , MICA PARK (Contd) • and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findinqs of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff`s findinqs, dated March 30, 1978 except that the foUowing conditions shall be incorporated: That the plat sponsor work with the engineer's office and the Planning Staff to determine whether or not a redesign of the plat would be approprfate. (Mation by Thomas, seconded by Quiqley. Vote was unanimous) . 13. PE-1161-77 , SUNSET MEADOWS SUBDIVISION: SWANSON C/O GREENWOOD REALTY, and ZE-203-77, AGRICULTURAL T4 SINGLE FAMII.Y RESIDENTIAL: That this Freliminary plat be denied without prejudice, applicant may resubmit plat with lower density. (Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was unanicnous). 14. PE-1170-78, COLUIVIBIA PARK IST ADDITI4N: BONUCCELI.I, and ZE-15-78, AGRZCULTURAL TO SIVGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: As Mr. Quigley and Kennedy • were not present durinq the February 24, 1978 Planning Co mmis sion hearing, and did not hear this preliminary plat prapo sal , the Planning Co mmis s ion co uld not vote on this item. Therefore, no action was taken. • 15. PE-1178-78, PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION: WOLFIAND'• INC., and ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL 1b AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RES'IDENTIP,L; T Hat- thts item be continued to the Apcil 1978 hearing because of a prior •k/~ committment of the applicant. The Planning Department will pay all readvertising costs. (Niotion by Thomas, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous) . 16. PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION: WOLFLAND, INC., and ZE-44-78, AGRI- CULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That this item be continued until the April 1978 hearing.(Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was unanimous). • 17. PE-1180-78, ANCHOR SECURITIES No. 5, REPLAT #1: PIONEER HOMES, INC., and ZE-45-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTUR.AL SUBURBAN: That this preliminary plat request be approved and in so approvfng, adopts the Staff's Findinqs as the Planning Commission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findfnqs, dated March 30, 1978, except that the followinq conditions shall be incorporated: that on paqe 11C of the Staff's findinqs, the word"should" shauld be chanqed to"shall", in the statement about the plat dedication. (Motioa by Thomas, seconded by Quiqley. Vate was unanimous). 18. PE-1181-78, VERA VIEW ESTATES: MC MILLAN, and ZE-46-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: This this preliminary plat be denied without prejudice, applicant may resubmft plat with lower dens ity .(Motion by Tho mas , seconded by Kennedy. Vot was unanimous). -5- SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION N 811 Jefferson Spokarie, Washington 99201 April 4, 1978 . ~ Honorable Board of County Commisaioners ' Spokane County Court House Spokane, WA 99201 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Thursday, March 30, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 12:30 P.M., reconveaiag at 2:00 P.M. to 5:10 P.M. in the Health Building Auditoriwn Room 140. The enc.],osed actioa was taken and is recomtnended to the Board of Couaty CommisBionerB, Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mr. Quigiey, Mr. Thomas and Mr. Kenmedy. p],anni rg $taYP ptesent:Dayharsh,Bethards,Fergen, Daviel Mosher! Wesche~ ~anc~ Bru~.e~e. Engineer's Office: Kennaly and Legat. Prasecutor"s Office: Ebacio. Sincerely, . SPOKAr1E COUNTY p2ANNING CQMMIS3I0N Ted McCoury, Chairmen Fred L. Dayharsh, Di,rector of P].ng FLD/sb Official minutes aad record of action taken by the Spokane County PlBnning Commission at their regular hearing held oa Thursday March 30, 1978. o . ' a ~ ~ N~ PE-1172- 78 , MICA PARK (Contd) and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findinqs, dated March 301 1978 except that the following conditions shall be iacorporated: That the plat sponsor work with the engineer's office and the Planning Staff to determfne whether or not a redesign of the plat would be approptiate. (Motion by Thomas, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous). 13. PE-1161-77, SUNSET MEADOWS SUBDIVISION: SWANSON C/O GREENW04D REALTY, ' and ZE-203-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That this preliminary plat be denied without preiudice, applicant may resubmit plat with lower density. (Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was unanimous). 14. PE-1170-78, COLUMBIA PARK 1ST ADDITION: BONUCCELI.I, and ZE-15-78, AGRICULTURAL TD SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIP,L: As Mr. Quigley and Kennedy were not present during the February 24, 1978 Planning Commission hearing, and did not hear tlais preliminary plat propasal, the Planninq Commission ao,ul.d not vote on this item. Therefore, no action was taken. 15. PE-1178-78, PQNDRP, PINES 1ST ADDITION: WOLFIAND'• INC., and ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: . THat this item be continued to the April 1978 hearing because of a prior AWOVOO committment of the applicant. The Planning Department will pay all ceadvertising co sts .(Motion by Tho ma s, seconded by Quiqley. . Vote was unanimous). 16, PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION: WOLFIAND, INC., and ZE-44-78, AGRI- CULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That this item be continued until the April 1978 hearing. (Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was unanimous). 17. PE-1180-78, ANCHOR SECURITIES No. 5, REPLAT #1: PIONE£R HOMES, INC., and ZE-45-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That this preliminary plat request be approved and in so approving, adopts the Sta#f's Findinqs as the Planning Commission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findings, dated March 30, 1978, except that the following conditions shall be incorporated: that on page 11C of the Staff's findings, the word"should" should be changed to"shall", in the statement about the plat dedication. (Motion by Tho mas , seconded by Quig ley . Vote was unanimous). 18. PE-1181-78, VERA VIEW ESTATES: MC MILIAN, and ZE-46-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRiCULTURAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SiNGLE FAMiLY RESiDENTIAL: This #his preliminary plat be denied without prejudice, applfcant may resubmit plat with lower den s ity .(Motion by Tho mas , seconded by Kennedy. Wot was unanitrtous). - 5 - . . y PE-1172 - 78 , MICA PARK (Contd) • and in so appravinq, adopts the Staff's Fi.ndinqs as the Planning Commission findings of fact, as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's findings, dated March 301 1978 except that the followinq conditfons shall be incorporated: That the plat sponsoc work with the enqineec's offfce and the Planning Staff to determine whether or not a redesign of the plat would be appropriate. (Motfon by Thomas, seconded by Quiqley.. Vote was unanimous). 13. PE-1161-77, SUNSET MEADOWS SUBDIVISION: SWANSON C/O GREENWOOD REALTY, and ZE-203-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL; That this preliminary plat be denied without prejudice, apQlicant may resubnlifi plat with lower density. (Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was unanimous) . 14. PE-1170-78, COLUMBIA PARK IST ADDITION: B4NUCCELLi, and ZE-15-78, AGRICULTtIRAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: As Mr. Quigiey and Kennedy were not present dwring the February 24, 1978 Planning Co mmis sion hearinq, and did not hear this prelfminary plat proposal, the Planning CommissioncouId not vote on this item. Therefore no action was ta en. ' _ 15 . PE-1178-78, PONDRA PINES 1ST ADDITION; WOLFLAND;• I C., and ZE-43-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTt3RAL SUBURBAN AND/OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: T tiat, this item be continued to the April 1978 hearinq because of a prior • conlmittment of the applicant. The Planning Departcnent wfll pay all readvertisi.ng costs.(Motion by Thonias, seconded by Quiqley. Vote was unanfcnous) . 16. PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION: WOLFLAND, INC., and ZE-44-78, AGRI- CULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That this item be continued until " the Aprfl 1978 hearing. (Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Vote was unanimous). 17. PE-1180-78, ANCHOR SECURITIES No. 5, REPIAT #1: PIONEER I30MES, INC., and ZE-45-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBi1RBAN: That this preliminary plat request be approved and in so approving, adopts the Staff`s Findings as the Planning Commission findings of fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's finding s, dated March 3 0, 1978, except that the follow ing conditions s hall be incorporated: that on page 11C of the Staff's find3nqs, the word"should" shauld be changsd to "shall" , in the state ment about the plat dedication.(Motion by Thomas, seconded by Qwigley. Vote was unanimous). 18. FE-I181-78, VERA VIEW ESTATES: MC MiLIAN, and ZE-46-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL 3UBUR8AN AND/aR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDE'NTIAL: This this preliminary plat be denied without prejudice, appli,cant may resubmit plat with lower density. (Motion by Thomas, seconded by Kennedy. Vot was unanicnous). -5- . . 19. PE-1182-78, CASCADE HEIGHTS ADDiTI4N: MC CLOSKEY, and ZE-47-78, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBArl That this item be ~ continued until the April 1978 hearinq.(Motion by Kennedy, seconded by Quigley. Vote was unanimous). ' Planning Staff present: Bethards, Dayharsh, Davis, Fergen, Mosher, Wesche, and Bruraleve. Engineer's Office: Kennaly and Legat. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio DATED THIS 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 19 78 BY: Stephanie Brumleve Recording Secretary ' FOR: Ted McCoury Planning Commission Chairman Fred L. Dayhars h Director of Planninq ~ -6- _ FINDINGS - M&rch 30 t 19 78 PRELIA/IINARY SUBDIVISIONS A11TD ZOIV£ RECLASSIFICATIONS PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Additfon: Wolfland* Inc. ZE-43-78 - Actricultural to Aqricultural Subucban and/or S tnqle Familv ResidentIal Staff findings relardin9 PE-1178-78, Pondra Pines lst Additfon . II: GEavERAL INFORMATIoN: i ~ A. Location PQndra Pines lst Addition is situated in the south central area of the Spokane VaLley in 8n area c:otnmonly referred to as the Ponderosa. The plat fs situated west of Van Marter Road and 300 ft. south of 44th Avenue. ' . B. Proposal . The applicant propoaes to subdivide about 4 acres into 8 lots all for sinqle family dwelliiiqs. The proposal would create a plat wfth a typical lot size of 1/2 acre per lot with a density of about 2 units per acre. • C. Relatfonship to the Comprehensive Plan Pondra Pines lst Addition Is situated wfthin an area that has been designated as being suitable for residentfal developraent by the approved cnap of the Comprehensive Plan. Within that Coinprehensive Plan, however, no density designations have yet been made. - D. Existing Land U ses The site is presently vacant with minor drainaqe drainaqe problenis beinq evident. • The propert4es that imiaediately sunound this proposal have developed over the years iato several sinqle family residential subdivisions with the typical lot size within those subdivisions appearfng to be 1 acre per lot. E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses - The staff finds this proAo sal to be sc mewhat iacompatible with the adjaceat existinq land uses in the area in that the adjacent uses have a typicai Iot size of one acre per tot whereas the proposal aow before the Planning Coauaission calls far lot sizes of V2 acre per iot. However, the staff does find that within those subdivisions that surround the prnposal now before the Planning Comrn.issian that animal keepinq is not present and, in fact, the use proposed by the sponsor would be coanpatible with the uses now present in the area. -9- . . . .PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Additiom (Continued) II. ' SPECIAI. INFORMATION : A. Circulation The Eagineers' Offiae has revfewed this preiiminary plat proposal and their office ffnds that adequate County r+aads are available to serve this site, and secondly that the plot design is acceptable to our off3ce. Their office does recommend, however, that as a condition of prelicninary plat approval that all roads within the plat be paved and curbed to the speciScaticn of the County Enqineer. B. Sewaqe Disposal The Health Di$trict has approved the use of individual on-site sewaqe disposal systems for this proPosa2. The site fs, however, situated near the Spokane Valley Aquifer where the Health Distrfct in their review of po s sible irapacts upoa qround water quality , has the inllowinq comrrients: 11 In the co ucse of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered tyPical soils, natural and sewaqe disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development ia the Spokane River Valiey upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (l) I n norinal pr8cipitation years subsurface di,sposal af sewage treatment efflment does reach and recharge the qroundwater. (2) AIl dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and deterqents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the qroundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil partiales , or nitrates, which ace taken up by pIlant routs" will be les s than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated resUIts at the dowustream end of qroundwater flow line indicates that the maximum range of (3issolved) solids cronceatcation ex- pected at pcesent (1975) is up to 93 aiq/1 (milliqrams per liter) above the natural qroundwater background of 155 mg/I. The forecase year 2020 maximum iacremental concentration is 101 trlq/1 above the natural back- qraund. The analytical results of the forecast uapact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dfssolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact aR c,roundwater quality is already a substantial propoction of the ultimate level. " II, Currently, results of chemical analYsis show the total nitrogen content of the qroundwater as in the ranqe of 5.37 pptn. A pro f ected incremeatal increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.5 percent would result - 9 A - PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Additioa, Continued) in a ranqe of S. 83 ppm. Current Federal and State drinkinq water standards permit up to l Oppm . M. Alternative sewaqe disposal methods that would not recharqe the groundwater have the followinq qeneral characteristics: (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharqinq to surface waters - would require at least tertiary treatment and pechaps moce to obtain a permit for the dischar+ge firom the Department of Ecoiogy. These systems are not currently economically available for this pcoiect. (2) Sealed systems, whether indiv 3dua1 or cocnmunity, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Sbme, such as lagoons, have safetp hazards associated with theca and relatively poor communifiY acceptance. Secondly, the Health District finds that because of a minor drainage problem existinq on the site, that a drainage cover should be installed through the natural drainaqe course on the plat to provide .for adequate sewaqe disposal. C. Water Supply ' The proposed subdivision is situated within the recorded service area of the Washington Water Power Co. That Company indicates that it does have the ability to serve the site with both domestic and fire flows. D. Drafnage The staff finds that because of the minor drainaqe problem ex3stinq on the site, that special techniques far stocm water contral may be requfred as a condition of plat approval. E. Fire Protection . The prcposed sul?division is situated in the howndaries of Fire Protection District No. 8. That Distrfct indicates that both cnains and hydtants of sufficient size for fire-protection facilities should be requireci as a coadition of preliaiinary plat approval. F. Schools The proposed subdivision is situated within the boundaries of the Central Valley School District where the dfstrict's facilities in this area are currently reachfng capaGity levels. The distrfct believes that this situatioa may be mftigated somewhat when theic current building proqram is couipleted someticne wi thin the next few years . -9 8- PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines Ist Addition (Continued) G. Parks No iinproved County parks are situated within the immediate area and the Parks Department has no present plan for either site acquisition or major park improvements at this time. III. 2OrTING ANALYSIS: The staff finds that a zone reclassification to the Single Family Residential Zone classification from the Aqricultural zone classification would be approptlate qiven the use and lot siae proposed by the plat sponsor. The use, once aqain, is tor single family dwellinqs wiih a typical lot size of about 1/2 acre per lot which would prohibit anfmal keeping. This zone reclass ification to the sinqle-family residential zone would be coinpatible with recent Planning Cotamfssion decisions in the area reqarding plat proposals of a similar nature. IV. ENVIRO NM ENTA►L REVIE W: The staff has reviewed the Environmental Checklist subtaitted by the plat sponsor and the staff finds that no siqnificant adverse environmental irnpacts vvould likely result fcom this proposal and a proposed Decl.aration of Non- Significance should be issued. Slight adverse environmental impacts were however, noted under the following questions: Earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, liqht and glare, natural resources, housing, land use, population, transportation, public service and utiliLes. . V. CONDITTONS: . If apprcval is qranted, the staff recommends the followiag conditions. Specific conditions applicabie to this plat are referenced below and found in the attached suppiement entitied, "Standard Conditions fio r approval of Preliminary PZats, August, 19 77 . NOTE: Any ariaendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed below. P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, P-6, P-7, P-8, P-9 (Apr~_1 1, 1979) P-13, E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6, A-1, H=1, 8-5. That the provisi,ons of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21a.080 RGW and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No, 77 -1392 be accomplished by the project applicant wfthin thirty (30) d.ays of forcaal action by the Board of Caunty Commissioners, . - as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. That prlor to the filing of the final plat, the drainage plan be reviewed by the Spokane County Health District, ~ That all roads wfthin the plat be pavgd and curbed to the specifications of the Co umtY Enqineers. That aIl roads providinq direct lot access to lots within the preliminary plat -9C- ~ ` PE,611-78=78' Pondra P.`ines:-lst Addition (Continued) ~ ~ . , proposal 'be paved°~and curbed to the "specifications oUtlie Couinty Enginee~rs . V , _ - ~ ,Upgrade all ~of. Pondra Pines '1st~.Ad,dition to t~ie ~ Singrle ,Famil~- Residential~~ Zone cla , upon- the f~13ng of: the~final ~pYat y s_sification., , i , , ~ - ~ ~ I ~ - ~ 9° D, . - ~ ~ I ` AaENDA, MARCH 30, 1978 SFCKAliE COIIN'rY FLANNINa COMIlMISSION TEImHmtE NO.: 456-2274 Time: Thursday, March 30, 1978, 1:30 P.M. Place: Couaty Health Department Audbtorium, Room 140 West 1101 College PRELIMIlikRY SUMnnrT~~~i UM , M c,T.assTr^rcnTTrnJ 1. PE-11 ?8-78 , Poadra Fiaes 1 st Addition ZE-~+~-?$j Aptriculturat to ARricultural Suburban aad/or Sinstl.e Family 8esidential . a. Locatioa: Section 51 Township 24 N., 8aage 449 E.W.M. ' Heginniag at a point, on the E liae af Governmeat Lot 6, 712 feet North of the SE corner thereof ; theace Wl.y oa a liae parallel with the South line of said Lot 6, to a point 220 feet E of the E liae of Panderoea AcreB 2ad Additioa as per plat thereof recorded in Book 8 of glats, page 51; thence Nly, oa a line garallel with said E li.ae of Ponderosa Acres 2ad Additioa a distaace of 500 feet; thence Ely parallel with the S li.ne of said Lot 6; to the E liae of eaid Lot 6; thence Sly, along sa.id East line, a dietaace of 500 feet to the POB. (Approxiatately located 8outh of 44th aad West of Vaa Marter.) b. Sponeor: Volfland Iac. S. 717 Piaes Road Spokaae, wA 99206 c. Engin.eer: Richard L. 8impson N. 909 Argonae • spolsaae, WA 99206 d. Site Si2e: 4 acres e. Number of lots: 8 f. Laad IIse proposed by sponsor: Siagle Family Dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Propoeed Zoning: Agricultural Suburbaa aad/or Single Family Res. i. Water Source: Waehingtoa Water Power J. Schcal District: Ceatral nalley k. Methvd of Sewage Disposal:' Individual on-site systems 1. Enviroaffieatal Lnpact: A topic of discussioa at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a sigaificaat adverse environmental impact. 4 , 1 . • P. , V11 E N ~ ' • . . r 4 " • ' ► ~ 'r- r*i N POIVDER4SA . . A • ' - . ~ ~ • • • A -077.+ .rv . ~ r , ~ ' s ~ , . . ~ . • . . ' . • . ~ • t • ' ~ ~ D ~ , ~ .S,!}+ } ; ~ • ~ ~ ~j 7 O SeTw . : , . ~ ~ • ~ . ' ~ . ' . . . , , -9- . QFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote tv `prLix 0 ,19! e2 Inter-ofNte Communiovpon Tp pLANNING COMMSSION prrg" GAAy KENNl1Ly9 PLANNING 6 TRAFPIC DIVTSION ENGINBBR ~<<• . Swe R . ~ p ~ o~~ Pw ~s Q o . , 0~ CQNDITIQNS ~s? ~ *OONDITIONS ClRCJ.Ell APPLY TU PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION ' . ~ that canditional approval of the plat is givea eubject to dedicstion oF Bight of Way to ths public and appcoval oF th• xoad systea in the plat by the County F=giaeer; . E plans, proFils9, and cross 9action9 shouing propo9ed street centerlias and curb gradss be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior Go constructioo and the filiag of a fioal plat; , . , that dr$inage plans and de9lgn calculatioas ehoving the grades and aligoraeot of drain'- age iacilitie9 be submitted to the Couaty Engiaeer for approval prior to aoasts'uctfoti and the filirg of a fioal plat; . OconstructLan within the proposed public s tteets and easement9 ahall be perforsed under tha dizect eupervi9ion of a licensed land surveyor. Who shall be reapaasible for perpetuatio,g all evidence oF th9 location of survey nwnuments whi.ch pay be dis:.urbed during construction and who ahall furaish tha Couaty Evgineer W3,th "As Zuilt" plans and a certificate in Writing that all improvements ware iastallad to the line9 and grades ehoun on the approved construct3.on plans and that &I], di$bttbad monuaaats have been replaced; - &no constructfon crork is to be performed withfn the Public Kight of Way uatil a permft has oe8n is9ued by tha County Engineer. All work is aubject to inspectLoo and appraval by the County En3ineer; (L-6.)all, construction vithfn the Publi.c Right of Nay fs to be completed privr to ffling tht final plat or a bond in th_ amount estia.ated by the Counry Engiaeer Eo cover the cost of coa3truetion of improvaments, construction certificatioa, "As Bu#lt" plaas* and manu.asating the atreet centerlines shall be filad vith ehe County Eagiaaer. F 7-no direct ecce88 from lots to 1/2 right of weys until euch time ae eddieional right of waye ere dediceted and roeds ere esteblished ea County Roede. ~ 8-no diteet ecceas from lots to Stub Roed connections uatil such roeda are conetrucead to Couaty Standards and esteblished as Couary Roada. z 9-road design. gNM ~ conatructioa, and dreinege control for 02 clghte oE waye and Stub RAad connections are the reeponeibility of the Developer. E IO-that the Sponeor shell prepere and eubmit to the County Engineec e deeigr► propasal eccept- eble to the State Highwey Depereunent of the propoasd SteCe Highway -County Itoad inter- sec[ion. Stete Highwey Depertment approval of the propoeed deeign muet be recetved prior to [he filing of the final plat. Improvementa to the Stete Highway ere to be the respan- sibili[y of the Spoaeor and mey either 6e conetructed ot e bond to cover the coet of 9ueh improvementa futniehed to the County Engiaeer in the amount ae determfned by [he County EngineeY and the S ta t e NighWay Depertraent. ~.1. tt~tt all roads within the plat be curhed and/0 peved to the specifichtion8t os hethe ll be~ty ~gineer. E~cisting County roads providing direct access to lot9 of t e p paved end* curbed to the standerds of the Caunty Engj.neer. OKANE COUNTY N EAL7N DISTRI CT SP . - Int'ter-Offi ce Communi cation ~~~le ro~~~e D40 Me, "rch 21, 1978 ► , TQ; Spakane Countyr Planaing Commis'sion M. • Eugene Sherp- , R . S . aald Eugene t~Lr ~ ~R . S. FRO ~ SOJECT: Proposed $reliminar~plat - Pondra Pfnes i st Additi~n ~ - ( 1. References : ~ - ~ a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 100", by Charlea,Simpson, dated Januarq 17a 1978, receivedlby thia office Januery 24, 1978,. b. Qrouaa-Water Resources and Related Gealog,Y NoAh-Centraltpokane and Southeagtern 8tevene Counties of Wash3:n.~ton, Depeaetment of Water ~ Reaour•ces, State of Washing'ton, 1969. c. The~ Effect. of Applfed Surface Waters on GroundwiLter qcinlit'y. in the S'~y okane Valley, -D. K. Todd, Section,208, We,ter Resources,Study - Metropolitan Spoksrie - Region, U. S°. Armar Corps of Engineers Seattle D3Letrict, April T. 19?5 • d. Soil Surveys Spokene County,.Washingtoa, Soil Conservation SeFVice, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Spokaae Couaty, Wa,shington Engineerinz_ Interprete.tions, 'Soil Conser- vetion Sez+YiCe s U.S.D.A., August s 19TI, f. Logs of Weshingtoa Water Powet Campany xells in Township 25, Reage 44, ~Section 25. .g. ~Field ;;6urve3t Report, Gene Shezp, 3pokaae County Health• District, February 15,,-1978. h. Nlap: Qreeriacres Quadrangle,, U.0:G.3., 1473. 2. To..pograpbyy., soils and,araterr. a. This project 13es in an area west of Ven Martyr Street,, ao~th and south of 46th Avenue, 334 feet v+est. b,. Surface soils ar,e ' classed as Epringdal.e camnplex with 0 to 30$ ~slopes-. They bave a`septie tank filter field 1-imitation,of slight.with possible contemination of grouadvater. c. Geological],y the soils are $l.aeioflwviel ' depoeite stream-laid ssnd and gravel; contains ecme boulders in places; iacludes some uadiffer- entiated gle,cial depoaita. -The,lcwer terrace remnants bave probably been reworked by streams. These gealogic structures yield moderate to very lsrge amounta of water. ~ . scMO-AoM-118 Pondra Pines First Addition Page 2 Me,rch 21, 1978 d. The data fram tva Washington Water Pover Compar~y wells in the area ehows the wells are 157 to 149 Peet deep and have static vater levels varying fram 650 gpm to 2400 gpm belov the surface. The total nitrogen level xas 5.37 ppm. The Washington Water Power Company has indicated that it can supply domestic use water Por the plat upon completion of egree- ments with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. a. The plat eponsor has proposed 8 lots oa 4 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site seWage dis- posal system. Thia rafsea the question oP sigizificaace of the impact on the groundwater in the area and poseible alteraatives for sew8ge dispoeal. b. In the course of the conduct oP the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and eewage disposal reche,rge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Yalley upon the quality of the groundwater. In suamery, he conclnded thst: (1) In norme.l precipitation years subsurPace disposal oP sevage treat- ment eflfluent does reaeh and recharge the groundwster. (2) All dissolved salts in sevage efPluent vill be carriea to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por- tion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the Qround- water and "minor dissolved constitueats such e,s phosphates, which are known to rea.ct with soil particles, or nitrates, Which are taken up by plant roots" Will be less than the tota1 Pound in aeptic tenk ePfluents. (3) "The calculated resulta at the downstream end of grouadxater flow lfne indicate thet the ms►gimum range of (diseolved) solids coa- centration expected at present (1975) ia up to 93 mg/1 (milligrame per liter ) a.bove the natural groundwater be,ckground of 155 mg/1. The Porecast year 2020 m$ximum incremental concentration ia 101 mg/1 above the natural background,"---"The aaalyticgl results of the forecaet impact of year 2020 when compared witb the present impact, bot?s meaeured in terms of leachate volume and disaolved solids concemtrstion, indicate that the present impact on ground- vater quality is elready a subatantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of cheatical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 5.37 PPm• A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected $.6 percent would result in a rarige of 5.83 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water staadards permit up to 10 ppm. ~ a } Pondra Pines First Additioa Page 3 March 21, 1978 d. Alteraative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the follawing general characteristics: (1) Collector and central treetment systems discharging to sur- face xaters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhape more to obtaia a permft for the disebarge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently econamically available for this proJect. (2) Sealed syetems, whether individual or community, depend on i evaporatioa Por liquid removal. Some, euch as lagoons, have safety hazards asaociated with them and relatively poor community eccepte.nce. 4. Recommend that: a. A public water syatem including fire flawe aerve each lot prior to sale af the lot. b. An on-eite sewage management system be ereated and approved by this oPfice prior to the signfng of the Pinal plat if more than a total of Yourteen (lk) dwelliag uaits ere authorized within the plat. _ c. A drainege culvert be installed through the natural drainage course on the plat. See letter per Charles Siatpson. d. Eech lot be authorized the use oP an individual on-aite eevage system. sk cc: Charles Simpaoa Engiaeers, Inc. N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA 99206 R ECE I VEJ) SPO~AINE COU;jrY PLANNING DEPARtMENT ~ ~ ~ ~ t AG~DA, h'1AF~CH 30, 1 SP'OI{ATJ~ ~~UNTY ~'IrAN1~ING C{J~I~SI~t3 'I~i,EPH+~NE N0. ; ~~6- '~im~: T~ursday, Marcb 197$, '1:~~ P.M. ~'Iace: CQU~ty H~eaa,th Dep~tment A~~,i,t~rium, Rv~m W~s~ 1`601 ~C~llege ~ T~iM~NAR~ SC~ ~1~SI{~N A~! ~"S_LEI~ATI~N ~ ~I 1. ~-1r178-~~$~ ~an~ra P'~.z~e~s 1 st Additi~n ZE-+~'-~~ ~~r~.~~tural. t~ A~ricultural Subu~~an and~"~r Sin~le F~mi1~ ~e~i a. Location; S~ct~.~~ T~wn~hip ~4 1~., 1~~~ ~.~f. Begin~i.ng a~ p~i~t, an the ~~.a~me ~c ~~t 7~,~ feet C~~r~la of ~h~ SE co~rner th~r~of~ ~hence Wly Qn a~it~e ~ ~wi~h the ~outh li~e af s~d Lo~ 6, to a p~in~ ~~(l feet ~ of ~he ~ line P~udero~ Acres ~uud A~ditia~. ~s per p~a~ th~reof rec~ord~d ~oa~t 8 of p~ge ~'I ; t~~~ce N~.~, ~n a 1i~.e pa.r~l~~ w~.th sa~id E li~e af Pande~ro~ ~d A~ddi~ion a~i.stan~ce ~af 5~Q fe~t; ~h+e~ce ~Iy ga~a11e1 ~rith the S li ~aid ~a~E 6; to ~~e E 1i~e c~~ ~aa.d Lot 6; ~hen.c~ aly, a1on~ ~~i.d ~ast 1 a dist~n~e 5t~ feet ~a t~e PO~. ~Appro~.~at~ly l+~~ated ~o~th pf 4~ ~,d G~est a~ 1J~ ~i~r~~r. ) L~. ~poasor: Wa~.f].~nnd I~c. "~1'~ ~in~s ~+~ad 5p~l~,e, WA 9~~ c. ~ngan~er: ~ich~rd L. a~.~~pso~ ~ 1~. 9(79 Arg~r~:~ Sp~kane, WA 9~~t~ ~M ~1~~ ~1Z~E. ~ 8C2'L~ I~utnb~~r a~ ~ots: $ ~and ~~e ~ra~~sed b~ s~on~~ar: ~ir~~l~ ~'amily ~r~l].in~s g. Ex~~tin~ Z~t~g: Agxi~ul~t~ral - h. Pr~pos~d Zani~g: Agra~c~l.tur~ ~u'~urban a~n~/or ~in,~le Far~il ~`~'t~r ~ource : '~ashi~.gt~~ Wa~ter Pow~r j. Scha~~ ~is~r~ct~ ~en~~al Va~.].ey ~ ~eth~d ~f ~~ewag~ I~ispos~l: Yndividual on-si~e ~st~~s Fnv~rvnm~n~~ Imgact: A~~~71C 0~ ~~,SGLi551~4~1 A~ ~~115 ~1~8I'1.~1~ ffi~~ _ w~eth~r ar nc~~ this p~opo~al wi11. hav~ ~ ss~n~.fi~c~n~ adv~r~~ envi~or~ne i~paGt. ~ + g k ~ ~ ~ ~ ; f' { ~ . , _ ,i ~"k _ ~ ~ ~r _ ~ ~ , I - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~P~~~ ER~SAF ~ ~.~--o,.~. ~ ~ . - , ~ I~~~ Y a ~ i ~ ' ~ ~ . ~ ~ k f~~+ ,~v~" ~ 1 . ; ~ ~M:~I ~ Z r ~ f . ~ • ~ t` ~e . • . . ~ } ` ~ ~ ~ , ~ f~l►7~.r .av;' ~ ~ . F ! ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ 1 y` . SerT++ ' ; I , ~ . ~ , , , 3 , ~ . . . i ~ i FONM 8Ad ~LNSi. _ ~ _ I J~B .-N~l.M~E~ ,~~fl2~]3 l. E ~ A ~ ~_E S ~ I I ~ L I 5 T ~~IRCH ].b, ~~~8 SPC~KAh~~ C~UP~TY ~,~N~Q FILE ~ " PARCf~ ~~CUi~E~.T ~UM~~Ft ~,l~Mr~E~ ~SSESS~Q [~WN~R L~GAL DES~R~~T~~~I 0~ PRaP~~TY 1'A~fP~'~~'~ ~ ~ 1 F r~ ~ 44 ~ (1~rC~ 7 ? ~ , l~t ~ aa~ 1 ~Olb~'3L~~ ~ PIEr~R~ 1~~C~N ESTa~ES h~~ ~ L1 ~4 C~!!~ ~TG a ~ t~Jt 1.1 . ~1~ O~r~+42-~~0~ ~'S~73~~~~4 5 M Wo~C~~~ J~. ~4Y~~?~1 ~ST~~'E~ N~ ~4 C~~M MTG k. - ~c r~ s~c~~~a~u~ c~~~ c~3~ 1 ° , ~9~~~ c~a~~is 5 ~~e~ ~ ~~~ar = ~ ~ - ~y ~,~~r ~~~r~~~ ~~t~~~[] A ~ ~L/ ~4~4~~-~4~13 75~6L2(~37~ ~:~M~s a~kA~~G►~ MYRiJ~ ~Sx~,T~s r,~" z ~3 B4 ~G~T ~I~ES'~~E~t~ s~L I o A.~~ 4~f~ ~ ~ _ - DA~f E: 5 $ ~ 0 ~ A`1 ~a~ ~ i , ~ ~ Y. ~C . ~}44~~~U~f1Z 77~015~~~3b ~~N~~ ~G~iU~Ir~G~R I~rR~~i F~T~T~S ~C 4 L~ 9Z Cp~MI~N~TY S~! q ■ f ~ A~ rfR ~ ~ u l1~ING~~'R WE N~R 4~442-U~U3 ~ 7507~77~~77 IN~~,~H;,M M~`R~N EST+~T~~ 4~3 ~2 ~ IN~C MU'~ V!~ b .~~71~{ ,ryf 9~~y{S~ ~ ~ 47 14J f «C!d Vf~ii~~ ~..'~4}"_ a~~, :J~'r~' V"d.. +:-"~~.~j!€,~, ry ~ .~~.~40N ~ ~t ~~~a9 4 ' " ~C~~ ~~i;;~ ;-L Y +~',,~"a.. , . ,~.~i ~ ~ ~444~~Q~t14 7~~4Z2~~7+~ G,~~l i~ SMI ~YR~~f ~~tATES h~ ~~4 B~ S~~TH GAIL M i. ~ r ~ - ~ I~7' S 4 T~I Y l ~ AE . S P A'~ 9 . ~ ~ ~IA ~ ~ 6 ~~r442~1~'~~}~'' 75G~3~~~~~ w~R~E~v r ~~~LE~ ~ r~~~~~ ~STA'rF~ NG 4 ~5 ~A ~ I S5l ~R'~H ~ E 1a~~4 ~6TH AV'~ SPt]~to~l~ IiA 9~{~b ~ ~44~►,~-1G~~~ ~ 77'pa153Z~~!~.~,~~IEI I~~'~ql~ EST~T~S NG 4 L6 ~3 C~h~~l t11~~G ~c~~ n$ #~O'~ ~4~3U5b ~~~~2-~~~~ ~~i2~~~~~~ ~a~~ R ~~~t~~ w~r~~r~ ~5~~~~5 ~a ~ li~C S~v ~ . 1~'~j 5+~ ~ ~ Z ~221 ~ ~ 4~~~~ ~ ~ ~D~~4~-15~~ ?a1~~103~~ T~r~ ~ILL~S~IE ~ ~Y~~~I ~ST~~TES L1 ~i +GI~~ESP~f 1't]~ S 1 l I7 ~ AFIhM~N ~1~ S !P [~h~A ~i ~ 41,A 9+~Z ~ r ~ I. . ~~F~4 = ~3~ ,,_.~1~1 '~~I~ 'M ~w~ ~~1.l~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~Q~ ~ E l~l719 47~H ~VE - - 5 ~~ItA~E W+~ ~b ~44~i~~~SQ~~'' 7~~~1454y~ ~'c~~J'~ R MILl4R-;> MY~~h~ E5~'~T~s rd~.6 ~3 I~~LLAR ~~~1~. R . E 1480 ~ 4~TH AV~ s~~~~~F . C ~ ~?444~-~~!~1 ~7Q~1~~5.4~ H~~~~T~~G L~~~T h1YR~N ES~'~:~~5 ~'~.b L1 ~k - 1~~?~IEST~A~ CQ~ST INC RT T 5P~1~tAl~~ I~14 992fl6 ~54~~~9~f~~ ` b68~~lC J W~GC!(EMUE~L~ f~5 ~4 4w ~~7~~T Q~ G~IY ll r~ ~~~~'~~IUEHl, JI It~ 1l~+ E t1~~4 44TF~ ~V~ S~'~~~H~ #~A 9'~U~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~av ~ ~x~ 0~ 6~D~2~~~i3b L~TC~#~~=~ t~~ ~ F1.~ C~'~R M~~RGAR~T ~ ~ 17~' ~ '~XC ~75~' ~ ~ 11`~ ~1F GOV LT 6 ~ltC ~f75~' ~ ' _ ~ C S 34 l. E 1fl~2(~ 44TF~ AV~ ~7~ ~750' ~ FI(~ PT'~ u'~ G~Y LT 1~ b~AF; B~G AT A~T ~N N T.N ~F SPp!(~,HE I~A '992~~ V T 1. ~5t~' f~~F idW C~l:• fi~'~~E F f + ~ G~ L ~ TFt ~l3(~ ~'H S36t3 TH ~9~~ TN 5 ~ ~ ~1~' ~ ~ I~N GJv T~i ~ ~ i ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ _ _ t ~ W_Z~ T~ P~B . i ~ -4-4#~ ~]V~T6 , ~~44~ ~~9~ 7b~6Z~~~3b L~"~~~~ 4~ ~ T F G ~v~~HA~r CA~~E~~ B ~ ~A~~ ~~~T TY~ N~8 ' T~ ~~l1E P_~$ H i~ ~`~l A P T - AYE r ~lti F'_~~!_~ .,aa =~,n 1'~' , '~1 T~ E L'~ J" ',":V ~~~f(~h~ WA LT 6 7H 51~4' T~l ~~1~ ti - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~54~1-9~95 77~~L5~~1~ BIII"~ J M~kSN~Y ~5-~4-44 P t!F ~~V l'~ ~A~C~HARES MTG + ~ ~ ~Ar .~EG AT S E ~ 1~~1 ~l~r~4 T~ TRUE Aa~ T~ '~35 ~ P1~ 171~~1 B CD ~ ~ 224 ~ OF ~ i."V ~~h~3~R054 ACR~S S~C~A~D A~D ~H ~ 124 TH ~ TO ~!F 0"V ~ b T4~ 51~4~ Ta P' ~ _ ~G L C 45441-~~f~1 64'95~3C LES~.I~ G QILL 05 24 44 5434~T pF Etl~ BACV~SNARE~ MTG ~ 5 ~~3~ ,~"T ~~V 'L . El~C W~~~FT 1 ~ 9~ ~ _ ~ R f?54~41 9~98 760b~3_~043~ M F FL~~~°H~~ ~D, ~4-44 PTh~ CJ~ ~DY ~~'~~.~5 ~~~iAlO ~ ' Y T' T ' ~ ~F ~i HA~~R ~ 1~~~A~, ~ 4"~ A P ~N N~C~ GCV L Z 54 5 433 S~ ~ NW ~~R "fH~ER~~F TH TH S3b~' TF~ ~4~' TH 5~0 ~4 ~T ~6~r' N'~F 5PG1(AN~ I~A ~4~~b - - - : G~V ~,T 5 ; F! E E ~,N ~F G~V L~ 6 TN S 3f~~ 1`H ~.0 ~ ~ ~ H T' P _ _ ~r PQ~GER~SA CR~S ~~lD ~~G ~ ~ D Ll~ U54~r1-~?~1 ~~Z7~'~6C R t~ G~D~~+~~ P~N~~~~~A QC~'E~ ~r~~ A~(~ G~R~E~a REGi~~ll4 t~ 5 4~i~ LI ~7 ~ 1~ 1~ 4 T V~ t SP~1tAI~E ~ld 9~Ob R ' N t~ Y H 4~ U 5 4 4 1- f~~ i~ J Z 3 7~ 7 1~ C C~~. N~ ~ P C~~ E R i~ S~ A C~~ S 2~'~ A~~ L I C U S 1~ K~ ~ ~ t~~ t~ ~ ~4 ~U2~T~8 L2 B7 ~ ~ ~ ~f ~ ~ 0~4~+i-~70~ 77(}~1742~~ C~ 5TJCK~ l;~~E~ P~~}~~RO~A ACRFS ~h13 A~d L IlVC MUfi S~4Y D ~ 3~T 6 1~ 189 9 E L ~ ~,Y,~ ~0~4~4l-C704 ~~'7431C ~~~55~L1 G~4~' P~1~7E~O~d ~~RE~ ~2~d~ A~~ LiN~ MUT ~QV B~f 0~ . ~ ~ 4' ~3 n~a~~~ L4 ~b ~424688 ~ . ~"9 C~~441-~~~5 ~+74~a-C 41_ _~"iSZ R' P~~1 •E~~ A kCR~S ZN~I CD~? LI~1C MUT SA~V ~B~( s C~~ N ~ _S ~ ~'~07 ~5 ET a1 ~13~7"b1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t~ ~ ~ r ~~c~~ ~~~~l~~~o~ ~~~~~~c w~~~~r~~~~~~~u~~ ~a~~~~o~~ r~~~~~ a~sc ~Ut sAV c~ ~ . c~~~o~~~ ~ ~ e ~ 45441~~7~9~ 7~t35~~~30~ CLAR~N~~ J'~~Ea R~!~f~ER~lSA AC~'~S AGC LI~~ '~kJfi SAV '~K 0~► ' n~ i~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~7 ~T _ i~~ 65 ~yQ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ 054~1~-+~7a8 ~5Q4~~~~E~~ ~~~N~,~R ~4 S~4 P~'~L~~R~ISA ACR~~ A~?~ A~~R C~fM~ B~( ~ '~Z32 ~'c. L~ B~ ~ ~ ~5441~~~'~~ ~CR141 '",~~~'IT~' Pt~N~E~~7~A ACRES ~~i~ A~Q SIP~~C~h~E C~UI~i'Y ~ ~9 ~7 ~W 111~ 8~0+~~~~~ AV~ ~~'~I~AN~ '~A ~~2UI ~~~+k~-~b7~~ ~Q~141C ~P~GK~4~VE C~11NTY P~f~'~~~CSA A~'~~~ ~~L~ ~CD S~C~~(ACv~ ~CQUNTY ~ W Y ~ L~~ F7 ~ 1~I6 B(~A~ A YE - - - 5~~~tAIV~ W4 99~01 ~M . ' P T - ~ - P _ P ~C N ~ H~C ~I FI S ~ SL~M Af~Y ~A`f~ l~! ~J C1~ D~ ~~CELS T I~~N S 2{~ ~ . t~Ob 1 . 3~bb ~2 . t~000 - - - - - - - _ C ~ ~ . _ - - . - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ - - - _ . a ~ ~ - ~ - ~ . . r, ~I - _ ~ ` 0 - n • ~a • F 1 L EP'OL.~. CARDS LAND AtBQuwt'BD H? ~Kt pHOIS r 1 { ~ Jva i~~~ ~4~ • DdIT~t - LI3T' f -nc;E `S7r~c -T R. o. ISLrc,-LoT K , /j~) I ~ jZ a S . CA927- D ~ a.`~'~`f. o Q 2 ' t f _ 9 9-1 ~ _ 9~!- _'.~9 r ! ' ~ ~ ' ~ y p XOvyunch- ins,ttuction2 -L - - e quote dark '(rnimeric / ' ~ ~ Q~ • COlw 1 Ia ~G,,~ 1 • , , ' co19. 2 - 4 is aonetnn` ~+6~ 9 1 0 cols . 5- 1-3 ie numoriG vi_t~h bl"Anks ecmp4.dble. El" ~•,r' r 5- p~ D'o nct zero f•iTl. n _ col. I4 i9 a quot,A mi+rk ( numsri c Zn H~` 5 0 ~ _ p~~_..~-hR.~`-~~~9~1~i''d~a~..~th~-_.~~„r'3► < . i 6 _ p~*. it ther ~ Q5j l~ - _ _ . , h • ere raU ~ ' ~ ' - " 0 p.9 0 ,91 ~ ~ A. ~ .6 , , ~ .~,.-69_i . Wwpa1IE RL'Y. frtD w A`~ i _ - ' . : ,s ; - . ~ ~ - ` - THE WASHINGTON WATER POVVER COMPANY . . . . ~ ' y ~:~~~•gpaQ R~~~ ~,"c~~a~~ru~ ~~c-~.~t P.O. ,80X 3127• SPOKANE. 1kA5HItiGTON 49220*0091 489-4500 January 24, 1978 Spokane County Planriing Commissioli North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99201 ~ Plat Name Pondra Pines lst Addition Address and Legal Description N. 500' of the S. 12121 of Govt. Lot 6 Laying E. of Pondarosa Acres - 2nd Addition except the W. 220' The developer representing the above described proposed plat located in our water servi,ce area # 2 is negotiating wifih The Washingtvn Aater Power Company to provide domestic water service and fire protection in this development. The Washington Water Power Company will consider these negotiations null and void if contractual arrangements are not completed within one year from the date of this letter. Sineerely, Harold Johnson Home Builder Representative R E C E I V E JAN 2 51978 SPOKANE COUidTiY PLANNIN6 DEPARTMENT 3 E R V 1 N G i N E 1 N l A N 0 E M P 1 0. 1 0 f W A S M I N G T 0 N A N D 1 0 A N 0 "Y Spokane County HEALTH °s a state of complere physi¢af. mentat and soc►af weft-be►ng and f1ot nieiely the abaeri+.e uf d#sease or inli►m:ty, District January 31, 1978 F. V. Seipp Wolfland Inc. • South 717 Pines Road Spokane, Waehiegton 99206 Dear Mr. Seipp: A survey of the plat kaown as Pondra Pinea lat Additioa for a feagibility etudy pertineat to on-eite aevage disposal aystems for that addition vas made Jaauary 29, 1978. Previoue studies of the eoil in that area indicate that oa-site syatema • are permiasible. Hovever, tbe topography does cause some limitations. Lot 1 and 2, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 2 of this plat are limited by this factor. Because of swales preaent on theae lots, it is felt that insufficient epace is available for an acceptable buildiag site plue space needed for an on-aite sevage disposal syatem. A redrawiag utilizing a combining and/or elimination of lota vill possiblq be aeeded to allov this plat to receive satisfactory consideration. Sincerely, ENVIRONMENTAL AEALTfl DIV N ~ i~ Eugene . Sharp, R.S. Envito ntal Health Specialist " 'l • ~ Dennie K. Kroll, R.S. E C E I V E Area Supetvisot R EWs/ae FEB 61910 cc: S okaue Count Pla~nnin Cammiasion p y g SPOKANE COUNTY Simpaon Engineere PLANNING DEPARTMENT North 909 Argonne Road 99206 P~ Ailrtilfllhlfmsisr. Ldbaintory 4 b6-!b JtJ 458-3867 1.:Isma• PU►Sone) H()8Hh 4tpd-.1640 456•3813 Euv~n~yc~nui~ ftienltfl West 1101 Collage Avenuo. 8pokana. Waehuioton 99201 V4tnl 54Ql116tIGb 4"-:340 466-3670 ► ~ PE-1178-78 and ZE-43-78 In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Wolfland Inc., S. 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Pondra Pines 1 st Addition. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and/or Single Family xe6idential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat, or plat$ of euch property. The property being platted is described as that portion of Government Lot 6 in Section 5, Township 24 Narth., Range 44, E.W.M. in Spokane Coun.ty, Washington. Described as follows: Beginni.ng at a pointg on the East line of Government Lot 6, 712 feet N of the SE corner thereof; thence Wly on a line parallel with the S line of said Lot 6, to a point 220 feet E of the E line of Ponderosa Acres 2ad Additionj ae per plat thereof recorded in Book 8 of plats, page 51 ; thence NI.y on a line parallel with said E line of Ponderosa Acres 2nd Addition a diatance vf 500 feet; thence Ely, parallel with the S line of said Lot 6, to the East line of eaid Zot 6; thence S19 along said E line a distance of 500 feet to the POB. (Approximately located South of 44th and tdest of Van Marter.) AFFIDiAVIT QF POSTING STATE O F WASHINGTOAT ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) belnq first duly sworn on oath, , deposes and says: That I am a cttlzen of the Untted States of Anierlca, and a resident of the State of Washington ovec the age of 18 years. That on the 1 Co day of , 19~, I personaliy posted one (1) or more true and correet copies of i.ne hereto attached and incorporated hereln by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIIIIG in a consplcuous cnanner at each of, the followtng locattons, to-wEt: 7-' r ~ ^ 2.~5- //M-, OQL-t4A ~ ~ z DATED THIS IaAY OF SIGN$D Subscribed and Sworn to before me thls day of , 19 Notary Public in and for the State of Washtnqton, reslding at Spokane, WashingCo: i ~ i J$muary 17, 1978 ~ PSEL24IRA►n PI" PONDRA PIlM 1 S'T. ADDITIUN ZEMAL DESCRIPTIOR That portion of? Goverment Lot 6 in Sectiaa 5, T, 24 N. , R. 44 E.W.M. ia Spokane County, Tdashington. Described as f411vws : Beginaing at a point, on the EQSt line of Qoverimeat Lot 6, 712 feet North of - the Sout•heest corner thereof ; theace Westerly, on a 13ne pasaUel with the Sauth line of said Lot 6~ to a point 220 feet Eest of the Esst line of Ponderose. Acires 2 nd. Addition as per plat thereof recorded in Book 8 of plats, page 51; thenoe 14ortherly, on a 1'iue parallel witb said East line of Ponderosa Acres 2-nd. Additiota a dfstance of 500 Peet; theace Easterl,y; parallel vitb t,he South lfne df 'eaid,Lot 6; to the Ea.st liae of said Lot 6; thence gout,herly, a2Qng said East 13ae, a distaoae of 500 Peet to the Pofat of Be$i.nning. Q►~~,L ~~~1~°~` ~A~►i~~ ~'O *10 ~ NAI. , - Richaxd L. 8 son w ~ • ! t~ tA`vY~ iL s ° PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ' ~ PUBLIC WORKB AUILtlIN6 W. 8!0 JEFFEp80N STREET PMONE 468-2274 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 . 4 . t " , „ • c, ' waRaMr►gc cauhrr couRt Moust Ni Yo MQ RA N D U M w~~A~~t1 ~►1~~ ~ ~ar~ Q ~D~R ~~~eu~~ To.,~SM. Co. lIMTt/ _b4T: J4~: Falt3',r 1~~ I~r~u: '~vvIR; ~o~ FROM: Spokane County Planning Departrnent North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 509-456-2274 RtCentfon: 0 lu-Ly _ R£FERENCE: Lead Agency Desfgnation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; alI or some o# which are attached. , . Pursuant to WAC 197-I0-203 (3), the Spakate County Planning Department, a division af Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTIfi1G AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the followfnq project: P&P 760 Dif so PI'Ves l =r This detertninatiaa was made in accordance with WAC 197 10-220. Information on file concerninq this propoaed action Indicates your agency Co be an AGENCY OF JURI3DICTION, WAC 197-10-040 (4) Accordinqly, ff you wish to exercise your opCioa to review and aomment as pro- vided im WAC 197-10-3 0 5) , a proposed Declaratfon of Nonsignificance was fssued on . Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportuniky3 ~ ~t1G1" 7 / Z f 7 . U-3 , , FII.E ~E-~1 79 ' 7 - 4 ti ! • .i n~t1' nj+ ~ ~ n i ~~;~ss'^ ' L i ~1 ~ 'i \ ! ~ ~ / i' 1 2•. ' ' -y ( y TAFF RZMW QF E RO NMENTAL CNECKLIST ~ . ~ , . ~ . z^. - - - . - • .-R svoK,%,+c cauN:Y couAT ►+ousc I, In accordance with the Spokane County Environmsntal Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submi_Cted by the applicant or his agent. This chea st and any add onat ertfnent data has subsecruently been reviewed bY the $ZAA)M14)C To . The following data brietly describes the ,proposal: A , Action (s) Requested: *0`0'Zone Change; A#' Prelimznary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval,; Change of Condirion O thef: . B. Description of Proposal: Jr VMAViLS/D/1) DF dI 4&?= At-L Ao~ ~~4G& AAM)LY 240&7-4/44S C , Location of PropoSal: -W. QFMA) M4*7V??~~ 4 _ A/M~ ~ ~ y'y ~ II. Review of Checklist: ~ A. Slight advers e isnpacts are noted under the follo`rving ques tions : (1) ~ Earth (8) .,,jeo Land Use (15) y Energy (2) joo' Air (9) Natural (16) jto-'o Utfl.ities Resources (3) J/ Wa ter (10) Risk of (17) Human Upset Hea3th (4) Flora (11) A000, PopulaCian (18) Aesthetics (5) Faur_a (I2) ~ I-lousing (19) Rec, (6) ~ Noise (13) ~ Trans./ (20) Arch./ Circ. His t. (7) ~ LighE & (14) ~ Public (21) Other Glare Services 79 y ~ I - ~ B, Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: C. Discussion of impacts identified abovP: /U~A)tP III , Conclusions and Recommendations : Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. -poo"O'Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends/issues a fi.nal declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse imnacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. 170)~ . 78 ~ t : ~ , . . SPJKANC COUIITT GOURT MOLSC ENIIIRONMENTAI, CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, R;"tiN, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmcntal values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also rPquires that an Environmental Impact Statement be preparsd for all rr:ajnr actions significai.tly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality o€ the environment. ThF purpose of this chECklist is to help the agencirs fr.volvcd c?Ptermine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completcly as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the chscklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the deQree of irnpact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, pr where you believe an explanation would be helpful to govemment decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additianal paqes, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answars you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies fnvolved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts whiCh will be caused by your proposal when ft is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be inv4lved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future , No application shall be processed until ehe checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requiras explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. Thc person complering the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more derailed information to aid in a threshold determfnation. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washingron for vartous types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUiVD 1. Name of Proponent: 2. Address and Phone Numb@r of Proponent: ~ - 7 1 -l ~ ~ r~~;_ ~ ~t~ 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spakane County, Wa. 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: 7'9 • O (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including bu[ not limitcd to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- standing of its scope and nature): L~,~J E~ ~ r, t~ 1"'~ tr n. T o T ~ ~.2sd.1.Z.~.► n a St,/ 7'h 33 ' J O~ i[~gQ Co:~ S~r'vc.~l Gh w~T ~ (~s.~crr'Y~•t:. -r. :~(F- y~, c7 t,S a.,. c+ v P1 ~o t'] z t~•r~~ STr~rY►,, J J 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal) : -P ~~o r~.l,n c~ G4- Sik h SC r~ t•v t~~ / 6ki s ~ • l 5 G~X 5~ O~ T' d l~,~ t rd S`• ry 7 IV ~7 0. ,n d M ►ro 4- ,7 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal; i~79 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or GoveRiment Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones): Cr, H +k,D.u~-7v, eA.; C -Qe E c,-r ; ~ . c, ~.SG ~ , I ,_LLQ~ ~e_+r`~J t c-C-_ S y l t n 4 A J J Pi4p,r~►r~ CaZMYYN I.ssln~, : C-MM4 r_rc 10a. Do You,or the owner in the event you do not owm the subject land, haue any plans for future additions, expanslon, or further activity related to or con- nected wlth this proposal ? If yes, explaln: lOb, Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposals location? If yes, explain: N ep, 11. Do you know of any plans by others lncluding the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: N b 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regard3ng the proposal; if none has been compl.eted, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: _ N or\ Q. H. ErTVIRONMENTAL IMPACrS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes vlaybe No 1. Earth. Wfll the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ? , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IK _ K. , -2- - r _ ~ _ ~ ~~`T~ • + k - ` e~~:t - - - - _ .s . - ; ~_-F ~ ~e ~ ~ ~ r` - _ i - i ~r.. (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INAD~EQ~UATF~, PI:~EASE ATTACJ-lAD'DTTIONAL PAGES'.) ~ ~Yes ~4iaybe No ; ~4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: 1 r- L { ; (a) Change in the divecsi_ty of species, or numbers of r any speci;~s of f1Qra {including trees, shru-bs, grass, ~ ~ crops, microflora "and aquatic pl,ants) ? , , , , , . , , , , (b Redu a~tion ot th~e nu~rn~ie~rs ;~of ~~~ny u~niqu~'rare or endangered spegie•s,.~f.~;01o~:a? . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . , ~ (c) Introduction of n~-,w species of flora into an area, ~ ar in a barrfer to the normal replenishment of' ' existing species? , , , . , , . ~ r~ ~ (d) Reduc~tion in a~rO,age, of any agricultural cro,p ? . . . . , ~ - . . ~ Ex,planation; . - - - _ - - - , , ~ ; r Ye$ MaVb~~ No- S. Fauna . Will the propos,al result in: • : (a) Changes in the diversity of speei_e_s, ~or numbers of - any spec1,es of fa,una, (bi~_rdI s, -Ja~r~d anirrials including reptiles, fis~h anc~ _s.,he`1`l,fish, benthic org~anisms, , insects or microf'a~una)~? . . . . . . . , . , , (b)~ Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of' fauna ? . , , . . , . . , , , ' X-_ , (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or ~ result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . , ~ (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildli,fe habitat? Explanation; . ~ - ; . ~ Yes Mjybe 1Vo ~ 6. Noise. Will the proposal incrcase existing noise levels?. X~ ~ . ~ Ex,,planation: ~ - ~ - ; T°tf1 1 I ~ 1 1'1 c~ rA- Ci4~S ~c-Q.~S ~ - - - ' - - - Y ~ _ . Yes Maybe No ; 7. Li _qht and Glare, Will the proposal produce new light or glare ? n Explanation: - r~~. s ~ 4 ~ ~ i ~ ~ N c~ S,c,~, . il ~ ~ } . • - - tl ~ • . - - , _r Yes Mavbe No ` B. Lanci Use. Will the proposal result in ehe altera'tion of the Y " present or planned land usE of an area ? . . , . . , , . , . Explanation: ' r • - I+ w o., ~ vaC~.h4 jep. ~ r J ~ h j( • [ s 1 V 4 - ; - • ' ~i a ,ti- . . ' _ t• ~ ' _ ~ , ~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PI,EASE ATTAC`R ADDITIONAL FAGES.) . Yes NJ_►vbe No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increa se in the rate of use of any natu~r-al resources >C (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? _A, Explana tion: . , Yes M qlxj~e N.) 10. Risk of Upset, Does the, proposal involve a risk of an " explosion or the release of hazardous subs[a;nces (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides,, ehemicals, or radiation) 'in the .event of an accident or upset conditions ? . . . . . . . Explanation: ~ t - - - - - ~ - ~ - - - - - ~ -s ~ r ' Yes Maybe No 11. Population, tiVill the proposal alrtei-khe location, distribuCion, density, or growth rate ox the human population df an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ i . Explanation: a~,~,-~~ t-~~q- o nh~~~,~"co,~ ~ ~ - 4 - a , 12. Housinq,_ Will the proposal atfcct existfng housing, or create a demand for additional housinq? . . . . . . . . . ~ , - . - , Explanation: r,+t o 1'1. 4 ~ Yes Maybe nIo 13., Transportation/Circula1ion. Will the proposaT result in: . (a) Generation of additional vehicular moverrtent? . . . . . X - . ' - (b) Effects on existing parking faci?ities, or dernand for , new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Impact upon existing tra~nsportation systems? . . . . . ~ _ ~(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement- of peopl,e and/or goods? . , . . . . . . . ~ - _ (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? , . . . . . , (f) Increase_in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, biGyclists or pedestria~ns? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . Ii~ c~. ~ 4~0 1-%~ 5 r1 C..,, ) t rm _ . - - • ' ` Explanation: ~.v ck. `C - - - . - • , a _ ,Ynthar'r►_ U _ ' H r l _ ;f;~_ • ; " 1 _ . ~ T • _ t ~ 5 ~ dih 'S (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INIIDEQUATE, PI.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes P✓tayhc No 14. Public ServicPS, Will the proposal have an effec;t upon, or result in a neeci for new or <iIrorPd crovernmental services in any of the fo11ow1ng arPas ? (a) Fire protection ? . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . (c) Schools?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other recreational facilities ? . . . . . , . . (e) Maintenance of public :acilities, including roads ? . . . (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: ~n(L_ r-q Cy <e~ tn r10 rM v_ si tCwt Y'2Turr~ 1-e<.4 1 r. c.~,1 C._ C,~ r.. c- e►~ s• Yes Mdyue r?o 1 S. Energy. Will the proposal re sult in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? k (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? ~e-"' X Explanation: w 6Qv 5 r 1ncA c-vv -A1 d 1-e-c4,-Ii c,c( c! ~ T~ 0 --%a ~ J ~ Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Storm water drdinage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ r. (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explanation: vit . Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health r azard (Pxcluding mental health) ? „ . . . . . . . , . • • • • • • • • • X- Explanation: ~ , ♦ • ~ i ^ ~ (IF °PACE FOR E}{PLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetic;s . Will the proposal result in thE ohstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the piblic, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explanation : Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities ~ Expianation: Yes Maybe No 20 ,Archeological/Historical, WL11 the p~ oposal result in an alteration of a significant archeologic<•1 or historical site, structure, ob]ect or building? . , , . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the perialty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge o I also understand that, should there be any wlllful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of nonslgnificance that it mlght issue in reliance upon this checkli st o Date: Proponent: A..) ~ / • (Please Print or Type) Propanent: Address: ~ -7 1-7 Phone: ~ L F, - 9 Z- Person completing form: ~ s E ~ Phone: 9?_'g' Date: I I Z-o 1 -7 S Dapt. or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: `*NJ~M~ ~l A)C ~ Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: - -7 s ~ • , E X H I B I T A PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLICATION FORM ' AREA AND DISTANCE •ooooo000oooooaooooo000000000000000oooooaoaooooo000000000000000 Total ainount of land in this Subdivision: ~ AGres Proposed density of the Plat: Z~ Lots/Gross Acre . 'I'otal amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: d Acres Proposed use of controlled adjoining land: What is the driving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? %-Z A4L,.g., Shopping facilities? (~,A«p- Municipal Boundary: 1•1 A.. Paved street or highway? +cc~ V~. LAND USE ■OOODOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOomooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOao Indicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwellings (?4 Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi-family dwelling units ( Indicate which lots: MobilE Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses: Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: KI !~h,. What is the present use of the property proposed to be platted? dq C_A..,-r- List type of uses: Cvltivated 1and: acres. Pasture:. acres. TimbeLt(,µr 4- acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres I s keeping of animals desired? No (to( Yes ( Tz~rpe: IMPROVEMENTS •ooooo000000000000000000000000oooooao0ooo00000oo0ooaooooo0000000000 Do you plan to file the Plat in its entirety as proposed, or will lt be a multi-phase dev- elopment? • E.►J-r'~cz~1'~f To what level of improvement will streets be constructed? Gravel Minirriumo Curb anci Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( Describe any combinatlons of above: What is the tlme period expected for complete development of the Plat: ~ Y2 Street --_mprovements completed? I /V2 . Substantial number of lots occupied? -Z yZ Is dedio.ation of any land for public use contempleted? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( tx(). Yes ( Describe: Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: / z04 - -00c')o Square feet 1Vumber of bedrooms 3-4 . Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( Yes Will any special deed restrictions be included in tne sale of lots? No ( y~ Yes ( If "yes", explain: UTILITIES ■ooooooooooaoooooooooaooooo0000000ooooot3ooooo0000000oooooaoooooa(3oooo Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal: Septic tank ( x Lagoon ( Treatment plant ( Other, or-combinations (Describe) . ~ Indicate the proposed source of water suprly: Indlvidual wells ( Public system Private communlty system ( Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easements (>1L). Overhead utility easements (X Utilities in streets (x,). No easements ( ~Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water main: feet. ' Indicate size of nearest main: ~ Inches. , List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: ~ Electricity: L Gas: t,tvcoP Water: (Lujup Phone: Q~3 u-) j ~ ' .At A*" ► , ~ E X H I B I T A Page2 PRELIMINARY PLA7.' APPLICATION FORM (Continued) ACKNOWLEDCMENTS 8000000000 oaoooaoo 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 PROPOSED PLAT NAME : b,V p~ ~ ~,7-70~ I ST 440 I, the undersigned, have completed the information requested, and the Preliminary Plat has l)een prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. . ~Q►~~ ~ (Signed) . Date: ,JZo ~ pF ShGye~ el~O7~ y o~ (Address) `T-41. Phone : ~q'ZC~p ) 372.2- -0 Z1P: ~ ~OL S-In. /STE~~~ ss/oNA~ SUR~D~ .SEAL : ease p nt the sponsor of this pro osed subdivision, am the (owner ; bui der ( agent option holder ~contract holder ( of the property proposed to be platted and have completed the information requested of ine and do hereby testify that it is correct and accurate. , (Signed) 01~1 Date : it . • . . (Address) ! Phone : . ; , , - . . ' S~ 71T f.l-"4~f .s ' . _ zip: . NOTARY Date : ~ NOTARY SFAL: Special Comments: - - - ' - - - 3 . ~ ~ , ■ooooo0oooo0O0oooo0■ THIS PART TO BE COMPLETED BY PLANNING DEPARTMENT •~~ooooo~O.OOOOOOi PLANNING DEPARTNfENT INFORMATIQN . f w Date Submitted: ~ qc> Checked by: w . ~ , School District. rreliminary rlat Fee. JZ ~ , - , Exi sting Zoning : ~ Date established: ~ a.~~"r Zone Change File No. : Advertised Zone UPgrading: G ~ Number of Lots: ~ . Location: Section ~ Township Range 1 ' ~ Plat File No.: Plat IVame: ~6 'a , ~ - s ~ ~ AU ~~Z~ • Ya. tl~~ `1g ~ ~es . . ~ e7 \ ~ ^ ~ ~ , I • o n • , , , ` , . , , _ ~ .000imoi ~ c • /lrf , An.~ ^ - ~ , . ~ i • ~ ~ ~ • ~ • ~ ~ er ~ 6, . ~ , \ K'INDITiGS-April 28, 1978 , PF-1178-78 - Fondra Pines First Addition: 'I'lclflandf 7nc. ; ?L- zd- iS --°-gricultural to n.,mricu? tural Suburban ?nd/or .9ir.gle Famil;f Reside ntiaZ P'RT-1I71471`TATC SL~' DISITI.FICITS In. ZC11TE ~~.^.T,ASST "'T C!;'^T 0.; S StEff f in?ing. rp`arc?ir.? PT-rt' 78-', F, Por.dra P- ne~ I 4. A.3dit.? on : ~ Il GENERAL INFORMATION: A. Location 7 Pondra Pines lst Addition is situated in the south central area of the Spokane ~ Valley in ttn area commonly referred to as the Ponderosa. The plat is situated west of Van Marter Road and 300 ft. south of 44th Avenue. B. Proposal The applicant proposes to subdivide about 4 acres into 8 lots all for single family dwellinqs. The proposal would create a plat with a typical lot size of 1/2 acre per lot with a density of about 2 units per acre. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan Pondra Pines lst Addition is situated within an area that aas been designated as being suitable for residential development by the appcoved map of the Comprehensive Plan. Within that Comprehensive Plan, however, no density~ . d ~s~i~n~ation have yet been ma e.~~ J c y~ #°„S r~ ~t*t • . tA ~L~f7 ~ Ga~► ncr- ~ c.~/ JYlt D. Existing Land s es , e. l~ The site is presently vacant with minor drainage - problems being evident. ~ The properties that immediately surround this proPosal"g-a-ve develo Ped over the years into several single family residential subdivisions with the typical lot size within those subd-ivisions appearing to be 1 acre per lot. ~ . E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses The staff finds this proposai to be sc mewhat incompatible with the adjacent existing land uses in the area in that the adjacent uses have a typical lot size ~ of one acre per lot whereas the proposal now before the Planning Commission calls for lot sizes of 1/2 acre per lot. However, the staff does find that within those subdivisions that surround the pcoposal now before the Planning Commission that animal keeping is not present and, in fact, the use proposed by the sponsor would be compatible with the uses now present in the area. l' p 9^ ^ 0 / ry l Y P ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ' • } t . } e ` > F ri 3 ' . n 44r _ • • • • ~ ♦ PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Addition (Coni-inued) II. SPECIAL INFORMATION : A. Circulation The Engineers' Office has reviewed this preliminary plat proposal and their office finds that adequate County roads are available to serve this site, and secondly that the plot design is acceptable to our office. Their office does recommend, however, that as a condition of preliminary plat approval that all roads within the plat be paved and curbed to the specification of the Co unty Engineer. B. Sewage Disposal The Health District has approved the use of individual on-site sewage dispo sal systems for this proposal. The site is, however, situated near the Spokane Valley Aquifer where the Health District in their review of possible impacts upon ground water quality , has the following co mments : I. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharqe to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the grvundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) I n normal precipitation years subsurface di.sposal of sewage treatment effl,uent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (Z) All dissolved salts in sewage ef+Zuent will be carried to the groundwates-. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by pIlant routs" will be les s than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicates that tile maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration ex- pected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecase year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural back- ground. The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact ari groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. " II, Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 5.37 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result - 3 A - 3 ^ - r ~ R-E~ 1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Addition. (Continued) in a range of 5.83 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to lOppm. III, Alternative -sewage dispo sal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics: (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecoloqy. . These systems are not cunently economically available for this proiect. (2) Sealed systems, whether indivfdual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Sbme, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Secondly, the Health District finds that because of a minor drainage problem existing 7 on the site, that a drainaqe cover snould'_ be ins_talleA..,throuah the ndtural drainale ' course on the plat to provide for adequate sewage disposal. C. Water Supply The proposed subdivfsion is situated within the recorded service area of the Washington Water Power Co. That Company indicates that it does have the ability to serve the site *rAth both domestic and fire flows. D. Drainage The staff finds that because of the minor drainage problem existing, on the site, that special techniques for storm water control may be required as a condition of plat approval. E. Fire Protection - The proposed subdfvision is situated in the,boundaries of Fire Protection Distrfct No. 8. That District indicates that both mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire-protection facilities should be required as a conditaon of preliminary plat approval. F. Schoo 1 s The proposed s ubdivision is situated within the boundaries of the Gentral Valley School District where the distacla.'s facilities in this area are ci=ently rea chinQ_ capacitv levels. The district believes that this situation may be mitl.gated somewhat when their current building program is compZeted sometime wi thin the next few years. 3 B - • • • „L ~ PE-1178-78 - Pondra Pines lst Addition (Continued) - G. Parks No -improved County parks are situated within the immediate area and the Parks Department has no present plan for either site acquisition or major park improvements at this time. III. ZOIVING AIVALYSIS: The,staff finds that a zone reclassification to the Single Family.,Residential Zone classification from the Agricultural zone classification would be appropriate given the use and lot size proposed by the plat sponsor. The use, once again, is for s:ngle family dwellings with a typical lot size of about 1/2 acre per lot which would prohibit animal keeping. This zone reclass ification to the single-family residentfal zone would be compatible with recent Planning Comnlission decisions in the area reqarding plat proposals of a similar nature. IV. ENViRO YVMENTAL REVIE W: The staff has reviewed the Environmental Checklist submitted by the plat sponsor and the staff finds that no significant adverse environmental impacts would likely result from thfs pmposal and a proposed Declaration of Non- Siqnificance should be issued. Slight adverse environmental impacts were however, noted under the following question s: Earth, air, water, flora, fauna, noise, Iight and glare, natural resources, housing, land use, population, transporiation, public service and utilit:es. V. CONDITIONS: If approval is gcanted, the staff recommends the following conditions. Specific conditions applicable to this plat are referenced below an,d found in the attached supplement entitled, "Standard Conditions for approval of Preliminary Plats, August, 1977. NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separateiy and Iisted below. - P -1, P-2 , P-3 , P-40 P-5 , P-6 , P-7, P-81 P-9 (April 1, 1979) P-13, E-1, E-Z , E-3, E-4, E-5 , E-6, A-1, H=1, H-5. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c.080 RGW and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77 -1392 be accomplished by the prnject applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners , as instructed by the Planning Depatiment Staff. That prior to the f ilirig of the final plat, the drainaqe plan be reviewed bX the Spokane County Health District . That all roads within irhe plat be paved and curbed to the specifications of the Co unty - Engineers. That all roads providing direct lot access to lots within the preliminary plat - 3 c - . ~ . ~ P'E-08-78 - Pondra Pines lst Addition. (Continued) proposal be paved and curbed to the specifications of the County Engineers. Upgrade all of Pondra Pines lst Add.ition to the Single Family Residential Zone classification upon the filing of the final plat. . _3D - D t 000 J' ~ ~ ~ . ~ . pP ~ ~ to