The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1176-78 r-- " . . AGENDA, F'EBRUARY 24, 1978 TELEPHOITE N0. 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PT ANNING COP4MISSION Time: Friday, February 24, 1978, 1:30 p.m. Place: County Health Department Auditoriwn, Room 140 West 1101 College PRELIMINARY SIIBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSFICATION 6, PE-1176-78, Van Hees Addition ZE-21-76, Agricultural to Single Family Residential- a. Location: Section 23, Towns'iip 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. The E~/2 of Tracz 172 of Vera, as per plat recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page J0; situate in the County of Spokane, State of Wasnin,ton. b. Sponsor : Rayrraond C. jJan Kee s E. 14025 12th , Verada..le, WA c. Englneer : Lati%rrence L. Leirweber E. 12929 Sprague Suite C S p okane , WA 99 216 d. Site Size: 4.9 Acres e. Nwnber of lots : 14 f. Land use proposed by sponsor : Single Fatnily Dwellings • h. Advertised Zone Reclassification: SingI.e Fami? y Residex!tial i. Water Source: Vera j. School District: Central Valley k. Method of sewage disposal: Individuas on-site d- sposa? systems 1. Envirorzmental Impact: A topic of discussion at thzs hearing may 'oe whether ar not tY!is proposal will have a significant e'zrerse er_vironrnental impact. ~ - - --f - r ~ - ~ ~ ~ ' 3 T H(A ~ ~ ia r►v . T~ • . , ~ 4 10 0 Q 1LTt+ oh . ~f s 4 - 1 V ~ ~ r - 12 T H T w L-F T HAv E . . . • , . , . . . ~ _ ~ - 1000 ' • o ~ I 13 T H~ _7 T yi . ~ , « ~ ~y ~'~4 ` TEENTH ~ z 1 - -r ; ~ ~ _ W I EJAR HR r, GH ' C FIFTFENT)4 T LVEixTrv . r~ 1 7 t~ Q I ~ r z a 17 < 18"' A-f Q ~ ~ Jj Z' Q i C r..r ~ Q t I g rh clr R y9~~~~ - 16 _ 107 L ! 0 ~ ► '11 . FILE DOCUMENT LOG F i1 e APPlicant ~A~J Date Started t ~ ID# ~ Date Received , DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ` . _ t~ . . rlb 7 Y ~ P'Ll a, ~ 6,), ZL L5 S ~ a 1 , . ~74 L/Y) as 1q7g gh-tt~ a ~b , ,97g ~ Transamerica ~ Transamenca M1 , , N , 9 ~ ~tle Insurance Compai• Title InSUranCe ServiCe T North 720 Argonne Roa 2~ztm Spokane, Washington 99206 . . ~ ~ (509) 922-2222 . AMENDED CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Order No.'89560 Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of VAN HEES ADDITION lI7G Spokane County Planning Commission N. 811 Jeff_erson Spokane, Washington Gentlemen: In the matter of the plat submittecl for your_ approval, this Company has exama.necl the recor.cls af tlie County Puclitor 1Ild Cnunty Clcr_k of Spokaiie C:UL111Ly, i^!7alzinql:on, ana tl-ic iccorc:ls oF L}nie C1crk oL tlic-, Uil:ited States Courts holding terms in said County, and £rom such examination hereby certiLies that the title to thE fallo«ing described lana situate in Spokane County, to-wit: The East 1-iz1.f of ]31ock 172 in VEItA, as per plat thereof N recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, pagE 30; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: BRUCE B. BUTLEK and JUDITIi BUTLER, husband and wife. EXCEPTIONS: l. lo excise tax, if unpaid. 2. General taxes foz thc last half of 1978 i:: the amount of 567.90. (Parcel No. 23543-1801). 3. Liability to future assessments by Vera Irrigation District No. 15. . 4. CoiI (~l"7 C b(' L[1CC11 VC 1"a 1', 1C'C L 1' LG 1•1,1 (:C'1' CoI11pa11 , c'l cC)1"pO1"c3 L`L nll , ll'1d 11 . C. I aI'1J_C5UI1 ~lL"ld O l:l1L r5 dat C'Cl Ap1°1. l 25, 1908, a1`lCl T_'C'Co1"C.jC'd 111 Pnnk "ll" Qf CC)Clt1'~3Ct-_s, 1)C7ge 292, relc_iL111g Lo wcZte1 cZnd clecLr.ic servz_ce on sai cl properLy, providinp-, for_ l.ieiz ror_ unpaid char„os for such sezvice, ancl pxovicling Cor rights o~ T-jay for ditclties pipc li.ne, etc. Referenee is made to the record of said connract for full parL.iculars. (continued) ' \ - , L ) ,s' Jy 7 ~ ~-A ~ Page 2 ~ Order No. 89560 , _ 5. DEED OF rY'RUST, AND Tf-IE TERMS 71NU C0N1DzT:LONS TIiIaREOF: Grantor: IIruce B. I3utler and Juditlz A. Butler, husbancl and wi f e Trustee: Transamerica Ti.tle InsurancE Company Benefici.ary: [3ancshares Mortgage Company Amount: • $79,000.00 Dated : Jutze 7, 1978 I2ecorded: June 8, 1978 RECOrding No.: 7806080338 Records examined to June 5, 1978 at 8:00 A. M. ' TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE C MPANY BY: Dave Goddard ~ cc: Paul Bastine, Atty at Law JW rro o 7~ 1249 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTONo ZE-21-78 ) ) IN THE MATTER OF CH~°IliGING THE 74AIXAIG ~ rJIAP FRG-NI AGRICULTURAL TC) SAtiGLE FAMILY ~ R E S 0 L U T S 0 N RESIDENTL4L ON PRC)PERTY LOCATED IN ~ SECTIGN 23, TOWNSHIP 25 N., Range 44, ~ E.W.M., SPOKANE COUNTY, N►ASHINGTGN. ) ) The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice of the hearing on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning Commission has held a public hearing as req_uired; and that the said Planning Commission concurB in the plan to zone the following described property as: SINGLE FAMILY RESIL+ENTIAL: Ail that area platted as Van Hees Addttlon located tn Section 23, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.1v. M. Spokane County, Washingbon. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESQLVED, that the above-described property be, and the same hereby is zoned under the classification of Single Famtiy Resfdentlat as defined in the Zoning OrdinancE of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amendedo PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF ~Ln g 1978 , 19 ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON VERNON o HLAND C er the Bo By' NARRY M. IARNED, CHM. Deputy RAY W. CHRISTENSEN This is to certify that this is a JERRY C. KOPET true and correc4jy f Re soluti on No o S~ ~243 passed by t Board this day o f ~ 1978 1 By: Deputy I hereby certify that I have d the above changes and revisions on the Zoning Map in the Building Codes Department, and do further certify that the zone classification change is the same as described above and shown on the attached mapo 0 SIGNED: 0g DATED : ~pZ I ~ 20NE CHANGES POSTED ON 7^ ,ZING MAPS Application No. Res. NojB-12~/q Res. Date qJ18178 a a ~ o ° From: To: o Posted By: ; Date Posted: Acres: Sec. Two. 2 S Range ~y EAST QK (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' ~A< (Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' 0 4~ (Wall Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' (File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' ~ (File Map) Metro #11 (Director's Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' ro~ (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile N~ (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles QK (Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' (VVall Map) Front Office Scale: 1- 1000' (VU -i11 Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 400' (Fi1P Map) Tracinc, 04 (SoLth East Zoning Maps) Scale: - 1000" ~__(File Map) Metro 411 (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' (Fite Map) County-Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Cards) Mlddle Office rroe 78 1615 BEFORE THE BOARD QF COUNTY COMMISSIOIJERS OF SPOhANE COUNTY blASHINGI'ON a PE -11iG--7,s ) ) IN T;;L I J',TT'r''. UIF FILI!:G T!-IZ FI;}/,L P L!`►T ) CiF V,'~;, ;►~~S .'`.~~LITI(„, LOCI~TED I~d ~ ~5 0 L U T I 0 N SEGT I 23, T0t:E~jSi i I P25 `li;i~TH ,~~~lC~C 44) E.►:.~ 1. , IS FG.1:,^,~i LE 'Q' 0 U;J Y ) :,AS,lI04 T0'! ) } BE IT RESOLVED BY TME BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSI01`IERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, 4JASHINGTON ; that the flnal plat of "n AuUITIOi'' 4 !lii .IL+.. T~ce `est 112 of Tract 172 of Uzra. as pcr p]3t recor:;co' in Vo1 ur.k~ "C' of P1 ats ,r-lacc '30. Secti on 1.:3 . T. D„ 44 C!•I-' i , Spol:arie County, 'Hashingtoii more precisely described 1n the plat dedlcUtion, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the publir, rights of way ded cated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until ttie County Engineer ha.s certi fied that the roads have been lmproved to County standards and approved by a sep- arate resolution of the Board of County Commissionerso PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OI' 1 , BOARD OF COUNTY C110'c S 9 0F SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON o RAY W. CNRISTENSLN ATTEST: VERNON W a OHLAND Clerk o,~ ~ Pe Board R y• L~~/Z'L~'/!//~- ~i',.~ ~ ~ a♦ 1-,G~ ~ . , ~ . ~ . ~ ~ , , _ . . . -a....-.. .s..r.wR.~..rr,.wi.w~^v.na.wf~t~or+c~w~~rr~N►`rrrt.'~n•frT4~iw1~'O~1C~Y (Gr~r. ~v'R~-1 ~ ~ . REC E 1 P T Date xt'r-z..J 1979 03 . ~ Received From Address g C: OP" D Ilars ~ 7'~ l'/,~C,~ ~ For ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAID AMT Of ~ CASH ACCOUNT , AMT PAID ~ `CHECK ✓ ~ ~ 3 ' MONEY BApUECE O Q R ~y ~~E COUNTY PLXNNI~tG DEPARI'aI:1R . ! ~ 8K806 Ri°'fp"" ~'~•76 . FINAL PLAT CFIECK LIST 7_ 1 . Final Plat Leroyed 2. Subdlvlsion name 3. Section, township & range ~ 4. Sponsor(s) ilame (s) 5. Erigineer or surveyor ~ 6. Sheet size 24" X 36" 7. North point, scale (100' - 1" or 2 00' - 1") 8. Boundary Line 9. Location & widths of proposed streets, alleys, nghts of way, easements, parks, open spaces,& proper labeling of spaces to be dedicated to the public 10. Layout & names of adjoining subdivisions a. Replats - Layout & Name of the replat shall be shown by dashed lines T 11. Street names - consistent with existing streets ? in city and county. - Check aqainst names on round name wheel. 12. Lot sizes - i.e. , 80' X 125' with 10,000 sq. ft. for single family lot Cul De Sacs - 80' at building line 1J. Layout, numbers, and dimensions of lots & parcels ~K~ ~ 14. Necessary engineeriny data 15. Does dedication state if individual water and/or public sewers will be provided in accordance with prelf minary plat of approval. 16. Notarized certification by a professional land s urveyor . f'~ _ 17. Private re strictions , if any 18. Number and type of units 19. Dedication of streets to the public 20. Easement verification & illustration Tf\-Q-.,oD , 21. Check easements, clouds on property, etc. from Title Report ' C/~\~4s1 • n C` ~ ~i -rF n ? ,^n ^ 1C ~-~(yt c~ " y'~ ~ (ll~ A~ • ~ _ ~ ~t :1 + 'C~' ,i = o n . r . . p , c~~, fi, 924 3800 Teiopho~ ~ I ~ E, ~ • ' _ - , f ' xY J ~G~ f`J^ ;(i' x r, f I il July 26, 1978 Planning Director Spokane County Planning Cornmissi.on North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washingtan 99201 Re: Van Hees Subdivision Dear Sir; This letter is to verify that the easements as shown an the final plat are acceptabl.e ta the Vera Water and Fawer i.f l sL L i4.rt 4■ S123Cerelyr ~ ~ ~ Will1 am J. Jobb ASS1st.aYlt NarlagE:r wJJ/vg # 9 5 0 . 7 8 cc: Taylor/Leinweber I ECEIIEI) ~ 11978 ~ FLA~~itiC oEPARTMENI JU LOT A!!EF! STATISlICS FORs V HEES AV~~~~ON FiLE: 1176 45/24■~ BLt]CK 1 A-KEy = 6282do 5O FT ( 1944 ACRES) ACi.UM AREA = 62826. SQ FT ( 1944 ACRESI CIFFEREhlCE - 0. SO FT BLOCK 2 AREA = 45737. SQ FT ( 1.05 AGRES) 4CGUMI AkEA = 45737. SC FT ( 1.05 ACRES) DIFFERENCE = C?, 5O FT BLOCK 3 AREA = b3b0b. aQ FT ~ 1.46 ACRES) ACC+JM AkE,~ m 636C6. SG F"C [ 1.4b ACRES) uIFFEREN~~ mw 0. SO FT GROSS UNSI T'Y: 3 LGT 5lAC -~k NET CENSITIt= 4 LD°i SIACRE LARGEafi LC3T : 1275d. SMALLEST LUT = l 1.418• SO FT AVERAGE LQT: 12298+ FT ~ a F LOTS : 14 _ . r . AFFIDAVIT OF MAILIVG _ STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) _ Robert- W. Fogg , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That S am a citlzen of the United States of Ameraca and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. 0 That on the 16th day of March , 19 78, I personall y deposited ln the United States mail at Opportunity, Spokane, Washington with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF ACTION, a copy of which ls attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to both DOE and/or the recorded real , property owners, as shoum on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the N/A day of N/A , 19 , who shared a common boundary line (a street, road, or highway is considered a comtrion boundary . . line )ihri th the property urhz ch 1 s the sub je ct o f the ACTION. The no ti ce s • j: . were addressed to those indivlduals and sent to those addresses as indieated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. r DATED thi s ~1~9 day o f 192L, tr 77 . . ' -StTBSCRIBED a.nd SWORN to be fore me this day of • . . , ' ' 1976 , ~ZY Notary Public in and forr ~ S ate \ o fWashin gton, re si din g a S pokane ~ _ - - ~ NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Pursuant to the Provis7ons of Chapter 43.21C R.C.W., notice ~ is hereby given that the Spokane County Board of County Commis- sioners did on March 9, 1978, take the action describEd below. Any action to set aside, enjoin, review, or otherwise chal- lenge such action on the grounds on non-compliance with the pro- visions of Chapter 43.21C R.C.W. (State Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on or before April 21, 1978, or be barred. The action taken by the Spokane County Board of County Commis- sioners, notice of which is hereby given, was as follows: (1) Approved,Action: Preliminary Plat Van Hees Addition and Zone Reclassification. (2) Description: Subdivision of 4.9 acres into 14 lots. (3) Such action pertained to property commonly known as and/or described as: Section 23, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. The E 2 of Tract 172 of Vera, as per plat recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30; situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. (4) Pertinent documents may be examined during normal county . business hours at the Spokane County Planning Department, N. 811 . Jefferson Street, Spokane, Washington 99201. Phone: (509) 456-2274. NOTICE GIVEN BY: T.D.C., INC. FILED BY: NAME: Robert W. Fogg TITL~~ Representative of Sponsor -7 SIGNATURE: ~ ~ ~ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STAZ'E OF WA,SHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Robert W. Fogg , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citlzen of the United States of America, and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the 16th day of March , 19 78 , I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspicuous manner on the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which is the subJect of the ACTION, to-wit, the followin.g locations: 1. Fence post - N.W. corner , 2. Fence post - N.E. corner 3- 4. DATED this 16th day of March , 1978 . / ~ ~ y of SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this da 19 77, • i~~'/ • ~ Notary Public 1n and for ~ie State of Washington, residing at Spokane n l v J S: ~ PIC REF. # h ' ~ ~j THRESHOLD DETERMINATION { y r ~ DECIARATIOPJ OF (proposed/final) a' ° 1 fI~'' I . 3MpnAMf CJUN V C1,U41 MUUSt (significance/nonsignificance) ~ 1. Description of Prouosal: a ~ S ~ Y~~ J ~ ADD i no/JJ 4'y~tz~ c~ VCpit~t. l~i~~J 2. Pro~ onent: ~ _ 3, Contact Person: Phone: -3760 3. County Action(s) Requested: D0 ' J` _ D 4. Location of Proposal: d1 CW.t_C C~it.D~ ~ c~ C~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ r S. Lead Aqency: SPOKANE COUNTY, VVASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to /~V7- have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is N67 required under RCW 43.21C .030(2) (c) : This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other informaFiun on file with the lead agency. . Responsible Official; Proposed Declaration: Ffnal Declaration: (name ) 14 l4f~s'~ (name) AU ~'d.~/ (sianature si ature ~ (title) U 1 ~t~7Z~1~ (title) 6imAgil? 19-0 (dent r ) )~1-fi-J1>AJIAg (dept . ) '~RD cr~ M. (date) V,19? )-7R (date) Dapartment Reference No.: . ~ (See Reverse Side) ~ 7, For Declarations of Significance Only: Date of Expected D-aft EIS Availability (detiermined by Rosponsible Offtcial) Date Entered in "CIS in Preparation RFgister" (determined by SCPA Public Information Ccnter) To be completed by responsible official: a. Brief description and listing of those en•!ironmental impacts leading to sucil declaration: b. Brief explanation of what measures, if any could be taken by the applicant to pre- vent or mitigate the environmental impac;t of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider Ei revised proposal with a possible re- sulting declaration of nonsfgnificance: g, For ProAOSed Declarations of Nonslgnificanr.e Only: Date Entered "Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance Register" (determined by SEPA Public Information Center) Date commnnts to be received (15 day review period) (determined by SEPA Public Informatian Center) 9. SEPA Public Information Center: (For departments of General Government only) ( ) Approved as to form ( ) Disapproved as to form Reasons; Signature of SEPA PIC Officer: Date: Pacific Northwest Bell Spokane, July 25, 1978 Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Sirs: The Utility easements shown on the Final plat of Van Hees Subdivision are satisfactory to the Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Company. G. D. Fleming Right-of-Way Agent North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 99202 GDF:nf ~ J 1 ' j U~++ ~ i~f SPOKAiI E Cuo e~ i"Y PLANNING DEFARTMENT 7~ i Y { n ~ A - k1Y~ Pacific Northwest Bell Spokane, July 25, 1978 ' ~ Spokane County Planning Commission ~ North 811 Jefferson Street ~ Spokane, Washington 99201 ~ Dear Sirs: ! The Utility easements shown on the Final plat of i Van Hees Subdivision are satisfactory to the Pacific i Northwest Bell Telephone Company. ; t• ~ I ~ i , , r . ~ G. D. Fleming Right-of-Way Agent , North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 99202 GDF:nf ~ JUL 2 SPOKANE COUi4jy PLANfV1piG DFPARTMENT P j » '7 4 ' 1 July 26, 1978 Planning Director Spokane County Planning Comms.ssion North O11 Jefferson Street Spokane, Waahingtan 99201 Re: Van Hees Subdivision . Dear Sir; This letter is to verify that the easements aa shown on the final plat are acceptable to the Vera Water and Power District. Sincerely, William J. Jobb Assistant Manager WJJ/vg . #950.76 cc: Taylor/Leinweber - R E C E I E JUL 2 e 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT . : OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON 'Date I9JA Inter-offite Communication TQ P LANNI NG COMMI S S I ON , frOM GARY KENNALY, PLANNING & TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER ~~IC• , , $u6*t ROgD NDIT IONS PL r/D^/ ' '#C4NDITIANS CIRCLED APPLY TQ PLAT UNDER CONSIUMTION , . , . E 1 that conditional approval of the plat is given subject to dedicatioq of Right of Tltay to the pu5lic and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Engisezr; (92 that plans, profiles, and cross szctions shotring proposed street center2iue aad curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval pYior to construction aad the filing of a final plat; . e)age that draina,e plans aad design calculations showing the grades aad alignment of drain- iacilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to coastruction an3 the filing of a fiaal plat; _ E construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be perfarmed the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be resgonsible for perpetuating all evidence of ths locatfon of survey monuaents which may be dis turbad during construction and who shall furnish the County Eng3.neer wi.th "As JBua.At" plans and a certificate in writino that all improvements ware iastalled to the lines an3 grades shosm on the 2pproved construction plans and that all disturbsd D10IbtI:II2RCS have been replaced; . E S no construction work is to be performed within the Public Rigtit of Way until a FQrrait h=s oeen issu2d by the County "Zngineer. All wo:k is sub jeCt to insp2ctian and approva? by the County Engineer; E 6 all construction within the Public Right of Way is to be comple[ed prior to filing the f inal plat or a bond in the a-aount es tiaated by the County Engineer to cover the cost oz construc[ion of improv2ments, constructioa certification, "As Built" plaus, and Ronw-nenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engi.^eer. E 7-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additional right of ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads. - ~ direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. U,__Iload design, construction, and drsinage control for 1/2 rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the Developer. E 10-ehat the Spoasor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal accept- able to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Highway-County Road inter- section. State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the respon- sibility of the Sponsor and may either he constructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. E 11 that all roads within the plat be curbed and/iv paved to the specifications of the County Ehgineer. Fxisting County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be paved and/W curbed to the standards of the County F.ngineer. . DO2.EC.T I.o T A-c-cCSS t'o ~ \ ~ I 1.5. PE-1 °171-78 it CHES= FII~LI? ADDITIQN : $ONUCELLI, and ZE-16-78, AGRICU'LTURAL TO SINGT,F ' FAM=Y RESIDENTIAL AND/0R rZWO FA.MILY RESIDIINTIAL: That the prelim3.n.a~y pl,a.t be ' apFraved and in so apprQVing, adcpts the 5tafft sFindings, dated February 24, 1978,1 I as the ~annirig Commisss.on" s findings of fact ais well as the cvnditions stated in the Staff's findings, except that the following can(iitioa shall be incorporated: that the stub road connection to the east be e].iminated, (Motion by TYiomas, secasded by Byrne. Vote was 4 yes and 1 uo.) 16. PE-1173-?8# PONDEROSA ACRES 7'TH A.DD2TICN: FHL~IP~ ~ and zE-i$-?S } AGRIGnTURAL TO ACRICULMAL SUBURBAN: T}a.at the prelimirar-y plat request be apprvv~~, and in s❑ appraving, adopts the Staff' sFizYdings as the Pl-arin; *ig Commissivn's fincings of fact as well as the canditians stated in the Staf£' s Fimdings d.ated February 24, 1978. (Mation fOy Bgrne, secanded by Main. Vote was ,inan mous.) 17. FE-i174_?0,, ~iSJli.lT A1J11.L1IOlq IYLFr I: WYAJ.1 j 21nt1 ZE-19-?8, AG"'IIuVL11JRi1 lv SIN4ZL.aE i~AMILJ. RESIDENTIAL AND/CR TWO FAMILY RMSIpENTIA-L : That the prelimin►.~ be a.pproved, and in so approvi.ng, adapts the Staff's find.ings as the Plamning Commissian's findings af facts, as well as, the cvndittians stated in the Staff t s iind=gs dated F'eb, 24, 197$ excePt that the plat candition.s dealin g with a zone reclassificatian be modified to read as follows : That upoA the filing of the finaT plat, upgrade lots 1 -5 Black 2, to the Two F'amily Resideatia1 Zone Classificatinn, and the ba1ance of the plat known a,-> Glyat ~ Additlon Nv. 11 ta the Sing1e Family Zone Reclassification. (MOt3oII ~y Main, secnnded by Rawlings. Vate was ttwan-Lmaus.) 18. PE-1175-7$, WAGGONM ADDITION: TdAGG0Mj a.nd ZE-2-0-78, AG.RICULTCIPAL T0 SINGLE FA.MILY RESIDENTIAL AN°D MiD FAMiLY RESII7ENTIkL: That the prelima.nary vlat lnawa as Wagganer Addition be approvea, and in sa ~pproving, advpts uhe Staff' s Figdings as the Planning Commiss3_an's f-indings af facts, as well as, the conditions stated ' in the StafF 's Findings dated February 24, 19?$. (Motian by Thoma.sx secQnded by ' Byrne. Vot2 Was 1in-tnimouS.) 9. FE-'i 176-7$ , ~IAN EMS ADDITTflN : VAN HEES,, and ZE-21-78, AC~RIVULTTJFAL T~ SINGLE FAMILY kESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat be apgroved, and in so aploroving, adopts the Staff 's~indings as the Pla.nning Cammi-ssiaas findings af -facts as t.+rell as7 the conditians stated ia the Staff' sFindings dated February 24. 1978, except tha.t the fvllowing condition af a-opraval shal1 also be imposed: That indivmdual 7 at access shal1 be prohibited to 12th Street. (Motivn by B,yrne, secaaded by Maan. Vote was aina**-i-mous. ) 20. PE-1177-78, FAMCPM REPLAT #3: Wn=} and Z,E-22-75, AMUCMTURAL T0 SIN~~ FAMII►Y RESIDENTIAL; That the preliminary p].at be approved, and iu so approving, adapts the Staff' s findings as the Planning Commi~sion' s findings af facts as well as, the conditiaris stated in the Staff's Findiags dated Febx•ua.ry 24, 1978, except that the candition Qf the zane reclassification tc the Si.ngle Fani7.y Residential Zane be deleted a.nd the fol3.owi.sg cvzxditioa is hereby impvsed: T1at a statement be place~ ~the plat dedication that an,ima.l keeping by the spassor be allowed until the last build3.ng ge=it is issued in the glat. (Matian by Rawlimgs, secvxrded by Thomas. Vate was unaaimaus.) 21. PE_1161L-7Y~~ MIDILCME =T ADYIT+ON: Jia4YILYM+} ` INC; • anci YE-1 3-78! AGaIV Vi4TViYYJ T0 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTILL: fihat an ex-tension of time be granted to the next Pianning Commissioa hearing of glats. (Motion by Thomas, secanded by Ma.in. Vote W85 iiriaxrZmO'#].s4 ) ~ 4 ~ . , ) ZONE RECLASSIFICATION OR P ' 1 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ACTION TAKEN APPROVE DENY CONTINUE LEIVGTH OF CONTINUANCE ~ REASONS 1. 2. 3. 4. CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning Staff` s Findings, Dated and subject to the additional conditions that 1. ~ Zv 2. 3. VOTE Motion by vll~~ ~ Seconded by VOTE YES . ~ NO f~7 iDe ` , I S~~~~~ PLANNrNG DEPARTMENT 9 Rl1BLIC WORKS 6UII-L}11MIC N$1# JEfFERSOIxI 5`fREE7 y I E~ r a r PHONE 496-2274 SPOKANE. WASHIh1GT(3N 99201 ~+r+.•'.~'T~S~"_yr _ S . , w`i - 5°CIFS#NE G4uHTY GOURT 99i15E MEMOltii'7 NDVM T o ; ~ . ~ t~L~[ JSl , ~5~~#Jt) Vq ~ ~ ~ll? ~ D &~~~P4 11e~ 1 doT7V~ htJ r~, ~ evv~~ ~ ~*e--7W F ROllli : Spokane County Planning Department North 811 Tefferson Spvkane, WA 99201 509-456-2274 Atter~t~.on: " AO.i~ ~ D-5 RE FERE NCE ; Lea~ ~~ency Designation, Praposed Declaration of Non- significan.ce, Envi.rvnmental Checklist, etc. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning r]epartment, a divisf.on of Spokane Caunt~, has determi.ned that the County, as an ACT~~G AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the fallowing project: F,F_-l l 7G~ ~ V,#jU jVL--ZZ5 ~~o A) The following is explanation for this deterininatian: )'77-J0°~r;z0 Information on file conceming thi.s propased actfan indf.cates your agency to 1a~ an AGENc~ JUxISDICTroN, WAC 197-10-040 (4). Accordingxy, If you wf sh to exercise your option to reviec+v and comment a s pra- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advised that the proposal was listed In the SEPA Public Information Centar on: , - - ~ ti ti - } . • , ~ ' i I I ' p'DEPT, FrLE REF. jO~ 78 . _ , r j I~f+ Ir~ ~ 4 i~', d I k 5.POti,S,yC CO'JNfx tOVRT iJOWSE STAFF ELEVIEVY OF LN7TIilO1V lVlE1v T#']L CHECKLLSI z. In accordance with the Spakane Counry Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-1 0f an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. Thfs checklast and any additianal pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the ~ The following data briefly describes the pragosal: A. Actian Requested. B . Descriptiox~ of Propasa~.: F ~ ~ - C. Location of Froposal: S- Il. Review of C;aecklist: A. Slight adverse iinpacts are noted under the following questions: 00 (a) ZV'47~~W : IC-~044 ~~c).04 k ~ _ (4) 1~~~ ~ N ~-r ~r~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~x~1~ CJ~`~ C f~~~~~. }~e`sav e-~~ ; C1 0 Pojo Uc,4 i-2601 -;z) x 0, ~►~T~;~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ TL) (16) UTI~ ~ ~&::S (over) 0/7 .r---- B. FatenCially signaficant adver~~ impacts are noted under the follovvfng que stions: 49X)4tT- C. Discussion of impacts identified above: III , Conclusians and Recammenda Lions: Based on II A, B and C above, the staff ~ . li' 7 . 1 ~ ~ G ~ 5+ 1 $NUhANE COUhTr LOUqT NOUSC ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCJJ, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals, The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", a s per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment, The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies fnvolved determine whether or not a proposal is such a ma jor action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "rnaybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight fmpacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the deqree of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional paqes, if necessarv. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answars you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which wrll be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in t}1e future , No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provfde explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and con tinue on to the next ques tion , RE CE IV E JAN 1 ~ 1978 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM SPOKANE COUNTY ` t. BACKGROUND PLAfVNlNG DEPARTMENT 1, Name of Proponent: BaXmond G. 1'ati Hees 2. Address and Phone Numher of Proponent: E. 14025 12th Ave. Veradale, Washinaton 926-3700 3, D.3te Checklist Submitted: 4, Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County, Wa # 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: y7/'7 ~ (IF SPACE FOR E?{PLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to fts size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- standing of its scope and nature) : The proposal is to subdivide 4.9 acs. of aarden land into 14 lots with and average size of .28 acs. The project would have paved and curbed County standard roads with drainage structures. Water., powe~`sd-nd t,ele,aS~P wo i1 rP nr~ n-v; ded - Gas is available. Homes would ]lave individual sentic tanks ard drain- 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the f ields . extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal) : , The pro-ject is located in the Spokane Valley. It is in an area of similar size -oarcels which have either been subdivided like this proposal or are in garden or pasture. The project site was planted in corn last year. , 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Sprina of 1978 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones): Spokane County Approvals: Preliminary plat, final plat, road and drainage, sewerage, buildings, and water. $-_ate A12provals * Water. , Sewaae, and buildinct. 108. Do you,or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, haue any plans for future additions, expanston, or further activity related to or con- nected with this proposal ? If yes, explain: No lOb, Do You own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: Owner of Tract 159, 10 acs. north of this proposal. 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: No. 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarciing the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Attached preliminary plat application and exhibits. . II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . X - - 2 - ~ O ♦ ~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . , , , . , , . , , x (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? , . . . . , , , , , , , , , , (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, depositfon or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake ? X Explanation: Construction of roadways, driveways, homesites, septic tanks, drainfields and utilities will cause disruption and compaction of soils. Proper encrineerina and construction of facilities should minimize or eliminate erosion hazards. Little p;p no site grading is ant i.c ijz)3ted fn r_ hotfle,:; _ Yaa Maybe ED 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X _ (b) The creation of objectionable odors ? . . . , , , , , , X (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Explanation: The emmissions from homes and automobiles on 14 lots_should cause~ minor deterioration to the ambient ai r__9ual ity___,_ _ P4'TH 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybc No (a) Change in cunents, or the course or direction of wa ter movements, in either marine or fresh waters (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff x ^ (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limieed to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - X (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? X (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, o,- through the seepage of leachate, phospates, detergents, waterbarne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? , , , , , . X (i) Redllction in the amount of watef otherwise available for public water supplies ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: (b) Paved surfaces wi 11 concentrate th.e surface runoff. This will be disposed of in drainaqe structures. _(h) sh is.. p.~-o,j ect i S i n thP Spokane Va 1 1 ev and_ w i 1 1 be on s ite sewa4e was te d i sposa 1. QjjPS1' j,CWc have hpPn ra j,SPCI ahpiit fihP dPtPr i nrat i nn i n nrniind watPC nua I tV because of the use of septic tanks over the acquifer. -3- (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUAT~, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,) Yes Mavbe No 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: ~ (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? , , . , , . , , X _ (b) Redu ction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? , , , . , , , , , , , , X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . . , . . , . . , , , , , x _ (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop ? , , . , . X _ Explanation: Some 1 andscap i nq and qa rden i ng assoc i ated wi th homes wou 1 d cause introduction of new flora. qrass would be the dominate flora. Loss °f five a-cres-of hat dicin't make i0would have a minimal effect. ol Yes Mavbe No 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna) ? , . , . . , . , , , . . , . X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna ? . . . . . , , . . . . x (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . X _ (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? -x__ Explanation: ThQ„ a rP,a js i n a rPS i riPn ta 1 ne i n hn rhnnrl w itb a 1;4rqP va r ier y of domesticated animals. It is Q~-obable that the number of sqLacies wil remain about the same, but the density would increase somewhat,~~d occasional pheasant is seen in the area. Yes Mavbe No 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: ThP rP wi 1 1 bP Some i ncrease i n no i se 1 eve 1 w i th th,p- ipts,tdtict i on nf mnrP ppnp1 P, nPtS anci marh i nPC ThP dPns i tT c-rn 1 i ht that t.hP no ir,P levels should be Quite acceptable. .i Yes Maybe No 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal prcaduce new light or glare ? X - Explanation: _Liqh t anci n 1 a rP f rnm 1 4_b,pmp c, I tPC chnu 1 d havP a m i n i ma 1 effect on the surroundinq area. Yes Mavbe No 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area ? . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explana tion: . , . , (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Mavbe IVo 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? X ~ (b) Depletfon of any nonrenewable natural resource?~ ~ ~ Explanation: Construction of paved roads, drives;~~omes would consume gravel, oil. wood, metals and plastics. There will be an on going committment for fuel and electricity. Yes Maybe ND 10. Risk of Uoset, Does the praposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions _X Explanation: Yes Maybe No 11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate ot the human ~ pop~ilation of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e Explanation: Y ul.~~ ~slight trneF ,L,as,e in t h P 1 n ca 1 P nqi fiV_, T h a r P is a larqe number of similar home sites in the area. 12. Housincr. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing ? . . . . . . . . . x _ ~e/j Explanation: ~-t~ ~ a~t~a t L-d th a t, rp_,5 I CIPCICPS w i 1 1 6P p 1 aced on k!&ac lot. The project would help to satisfy current demands for housing in this area. Yes Maybe No 13. Transportation/Circulation, Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of addiCional vehicular movemPnt? . . . . . x _ (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? , X _ (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or x movement of peoplP and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . _ (e) Alterations to tvaterborne, rail or air traffic? X (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . , , , , , , . _ Explanation: Up to 57 vehicle trips per day would be generated by the project with a sliqht effect on 12th Ave., Everqreen, and Adams. - S - (15 *~Ov) (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas ? (a) Fire protection? . , , , . , . . . . , . , . . . X _ (b) Police protection? X _ (c) Schools ? . . . , , , , , . . , . , , , , , , , X _ (d) Parks or other recreational facilities ? . , , , , , , . X (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? X _ (f) Other governmental services? . . . , , . , , , , . x _ £xplanation: CJ-Dc c rnnm c,~,nale' pnl ;~nd f i rP nrntPrt ion r nnTS ta 1, and road maintenance services would be required. These could be handeled bv existinq services. Yes Maybe No 15. Energy, Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X _ Explanation: The automobiles and homes will reauire an onqoinQ committment for fuel and electricity. Their consumption should be abou h same as that normallv a5sociated with residential activities. Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities; (a) Power or natural gas ? . . . . . . . . . , , , , , X _ (b) Communication systems ? . . . , . . . , , , , , . X _ (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X - (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? , . , . , . . , , , , , . X _ (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . , . . . , , , X _ (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . , . . . . , , , . -X- ~ Explanation: Power, telephone and water service wi 11 be extended to each rcP 1 _ Homes w i 1 1 hayP i nd i v" dua1 sewage was te di,sposa 1 sys t~,,,~ . . , St-orm water disnosal to be bv curb and putter to drainaqe structures. Garbage pick up is available. Yes Maybe No , 17. Human Health. Will the proposal resLilt in the creation of ~ any health hazard or potential health r azard (excluding mental health) ? . . . . , , , . , . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: m- , -6- , w ~ J~ ^ "q • (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P1.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the oUstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the pLiblic, or will the pro- posal result in the creation o#' an aesthetically offensive site opsn to public view? . . . , . . , . . , , , , , X Explana tion : Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? x Explanation: Yes Maybe No 20. Archeolo4ical/Historical, WL11 the proposal result in an ~ alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, objECt or building ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understancl that, should there be any wlllful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full dlsclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of nonsignlficance that it might issue in reliance upon this checkli st, Date: Proponent:/~ (Please Print or Type) Proponent: Raymond C. 1(i;n HP.PS Address: F 14095 19zj:~ ~Ierad~le. Wa5h i naton Phone: 926-3700 Person completing form• Law ren ce L. Le i nweb e r P. L, S. Phone: 926-2839 Date: 12/22/77 Dapt, or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: t /7 17 t - -7 5POKANE VALLE(I rlRE DEPArATIAENT &&fe,4 74e, a~ (Ig / EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 February 21, 1978 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Mr. Dayharsh: ` The following Preliminary subdivisions and zone classification fo r upgrading has been reviewed for fire protection: PE-1080-77 ZE- 27-77 Barden- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area , PE-1161-77 ZE- 203-77 Swanson c/o Greenwood Realty- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area PE-1167-78 zE- 12-78 Sargent - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in th i s a rea PE-1169-78 ' ZE- 14-78 Byers - Mai ns and hydrants need to be installed in this area PE-1171-78 ZE- 16-78 Bonucelli- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. PE-1172-78 ZE- 17-78 "C" Fritz Nelsen, Inc.- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area FtECEI FER 2 2 id ;tj SPOKANE COUNiY IC63 PLANNING DEPARTMENT PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI VES 1 J ~ Page 2 P E-117 3- 78 ZE- 18-78 Phillips- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area . PE-1174-78 ZE- 19-78 Wyatt- Ma i ns and hydrants need to be i nstal 1 ed in this area PE-1175-78 ZE- 20-78 Waggoner- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area PE-1176-78 ZE- 21-78 Uan Hees- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area PE-1177-78 ZE- 22-78 Winner- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area PE-1168-78 ZE- 13-78 Mililome, Inc.- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. - A1 Coo'k Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn R E C E I v E Ftr3 2 2 iy-13 SPOKANC COUidiY PLANNING DEPARTMENT l.~ . y FIlVDINGS PE-1176-78 VAN HEES ADDITION : VAN HEES ZE- 21-78 - AGRICULTtJRAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL I. GENERAL INFORNIATION A. Location Van Hees Addition is situated in the south cEritral area of Spokane Valley south of 12th Ave. midtiaay between Evergreen Rd. on the west and Adams Rd. on the e ast . B. Proposal The applicant proposes to subdivide about 5 acres into 14 lots a11 for Single Family Dwellings. The proposal would create a gross density of about 3 units per acre, with a typical lot size in excess of 12,300 square feet per lot. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan Van Hees Addition is situated within an area that has been designated as being suitable for residential development by the approved map of the Comprehensive Plan. Within that Comprehensive Plan however no density designations have yet occured. D. Existing Land Uses The site is currently i-n active cropland ve&etation with no sionificant topo,,crraPhic features. The properties that geenerall.y suround thi-s proposal have devebpud over the yeai•s into several resi- dential subdivisions including Tally Ho Sabdi-vision, Helstrom's Sub- division, Cherry Subdivision, and Lehi Subdivision. E. Compatibility 4Jith Existlrig Land Uses The staff finds this proposal to be compatiLle writh recent Planning Commission decisions in the area as well as being compatible with future intended uses for the area - higher density resider_tial uses. Some conflicts might result, however in the short term regardzng possible conflicts between larger 1ot uses situated to the east a.nd west of the proposal and the smaller lot --ubclivision proposal. II. SPECIAL INFQF2MATIOIV : A. Circul.ation The Engineer's office has reviewed this proposal and their office finds that the plat design is accevtabie to their office and secondly zhat adequate County roads noctil exist to serve the preliminary plat. Their office does recommend howeve-r that as a condition of plat approval both paving and curbing of fhe roads within the proposal be required. l - 16 - . ~ PE-1'I?6-78 - Van Hees Addition (Continued) B. Sewage Disposal The Health District has approved the use of individual on-site systems to serve the proposal. The plat is however situated over the Valley Aquifer where moderate impact upon water quality might be expected at some future date if continued urbanization at this density continues. C. Water Supply The proposed subdivlsion is situated within the recorded service area of Vera Irrigation District. That district indicates that it does have the ability to serve the site with both domestic and fire flows. D. Drainage The staff finds that because of the relatively flat terrain of the site and that of the adjacent properties that no special drainage control methods would be required and standard techniques for storm water control could be employed. E. Fire Protection The proposed subdivision is situated c,rithin the recorded service area of Fire Protection District #1. That districts indicates that both mains and hydrants are sufficient size for fire protection needs should be required as a condition of plat approval. F. Parks No improved County Parks are currently available in the area and the County Parks Dept. has no present plan for either site acquisition or major park improvements at this time. G. Schools Central Valley School District indicates that their district iacilities within this area are currently at capacity levele, and that their district ma:,r expect some short term diwiculties in serving this proDosal. jNhen their current building program is completed in about 2 years time, however, this problem may be mitigated somewhat. III. ZONING ANALYSIS The staff finds that it caould be appropri ate to rezone this proposal to the Single Family Residential Zone. The staff finds that it would be appropriate to rezone this proposal to the Single Family Residential Zone because oi the use and character of the proposal as well as the use and character of the surounding area. The staff also finds that an upgrade to the Single Family Residentlal Zone would be consistent with recent Planning Commission dec3sions in the area. N . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Staff has reviewed the Environmental Checklist submitted by the applicant - 16 A - 9 PE-1176-78 - Van Hees Additlon (Continued) and the staff finds that no significant adverse Environme.ntal Impacts would likely resolve and a proposed declaration of nonsignificance should be issued. Slight adverse environmental impacts were however noted under the following questions: earth, air, water, Ll.ora, fauna, noise, light and glare, land use, natural resources, popul.ation, housing, transportation, public services, energy and utilities. V. CONDITIONS: If approval is granted, the Staff recommends the following conditions: Specific conditions applicable to this plat are referenced below and found in the attached supplement entitled, "Standard Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats - Sugust, 1977'r. NOZtE; Any amendments to said conditions are stated sep2.rately and listed below. P-1 , P-29 P-3, P-41 P-51 P-61 P-71 P-81 P-9, (March 1, 1979), P-13, E-1 , E-21 E-31 E-41 E-51 E-61 E-71 E-81 E-91 A-11 H-11 H-5. That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to the lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. Upon filing of the final plat, upgrade Van Hees Addition to the Single Family Residential Zone Classification. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution N0. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project Applicant within thirty days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners; as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. - 16 B - ~a . . ~ 'D . . _ ~ ~ ' ~fe f 1 N f,• QNS . CywNDI ~ ~ y i : _ - . "?~r-a' _ 1. ~ ' y~-1: S ~ 31• -S~ „ ~ ~ ^ ~ • ~~Y~=~ s' Y t...- c f ~ =a~~ ~ f. .Y . ti , STANI✓ ~ . i, . ~k , ~ ~ , rh r ~ ",,,xi ~ ~t ":Y, • , • 'C i ' •~i 1r ►by~ _ . ;.i.:~ - tt4 _ . ) ~ aw~a ~ ~ ~ ~ , f` ~ '-y ~ 2a~ ~ 7 y~./' ' • : ' . ~Y p~ds ~ . . . . . ~ OF . p~~MI~. . ~ . - , , . . . . . , _ . , _ - . . . APpROVAL _ , • 1 " . . I ~ ~ . ' ' . • ~ ~v. ' ' i~ yh~~ ~ -tt ' ` •;~r. '-~itl;n, t '~R,ro~ . . ~ " + . k' ~ : 4i.~ ►j 1~.v ' . - ~ ` A ~ ~ ~ , z ~ , ~ " ' t' ' . > y; ~ 6~ ~ t.rf'~ F;~.-~~R . ~ T I ~ ' ' • • ! ~ i~` i1.~ a ' ~ M~ A= ' ~ { °i - 2 • _ • ~ ' ' ~ i ' 4 ^ . , Y ' ' .~,s,' ~ `.X; ij~. -~'A.;' ?~t~,•` ' ` ~ 977 A U7U~~•;~' . ~ • , , ~ tPr' ~'v~•.,,~' . =''+sp'~`~y~ ~,.','~l„ ~ , • ~ ' - tii , t. r i t - " ~ • ` =i„ ~ ' .%i, , r~ • ~ ' _ • ~ \ ~ . ` ' ~ ~ i, /e 't a.i '-a r. ~ • ` ' . . +'~i y ~^s a ~,R' ~~'.~s~ :S , t z ~ r -F . ' L ' ~ ~ _ . ~ t .k . ~4 ~~:•s~-~ ~ x_ ' : • _ _ ' i ~ >s",o3`t~:~ rti - ~ + '~i.~ ~ ' , • ' r - ` - ~ , ~ ` . ' ~ - ; - , • ~ ' , _ r~~`rz. ~ti ~ ~ i„r a, _ , , r , ,~t:..,, ,~S t- ~ j ~ , • ' • n • ~ •LV~~'"~.3'~''~',~s vp ~ r~ ~ ~ F .t ,yji~~'..~*.'fy"'~4'tti~~' t' ii ` ~ i ~r ~ " '9 ~~H . ; ;y~ f' t :r, : F '6.>y~ Yi e `4..~4'~t.~i'~~'j}4~'t` ~R ~y`;~^;`nt • rt~c « . ' , . , • ~ ' 'i`•~Y ~ yi~~PY~~ ~ - :~i"'.-~~+~it1~'"~,d•yar y F.'.~~~':.~~°t }1?3~~b;~,;~~:.''7 ~~•+`A. ' i~'~r. ~t s. ' ~ ' ' %r7..... r • ~ fii"'' ~ ~ ~i~~5+~~-' ~ • '•ty t 1'~~+:Y~: + t ,i•~*r~ ~,r. f~' :rw ^ ~d„'°_ a . ' , ' ya ' , ' ` ' ~ ' `...j ~cw' _ a- '~34f•~-.y t. ~ ~y~~~ ~ _e~. , ~.~F+' ~~vy,~, `hl~~~r^'~ F'%t( s ~ ! . ~ ~ y . ^j .a. i~t , ~ r^.`. ~r t `y;~ ~ ~'.t~y: r,1'h~s~ ~ ~4&~t. ~h ~ 'Fa~•h,i CSQ. ^R t1 ~ - _ _ y fty a ^ ~y^ ~ u r y ~ ~ ~ ~ • , ~ . : - • _ ~ S :y • ` - "~~;~~f,,•y,'d`~~+N • ~ ~ -~y - ~TMEi3~ ~ ` '."~r ~.i, i, ~ . e.9r ~ „ • ~ ~ . 1 r; 1 i • - ' ~ ' ~•r~ ~ ~ ' ~ ° ~r • • '.:~i ~t''`~'`-. '1' 1_ l'- ~ ~F_.P +e~~ r„` ~ ;rf; _ ` • ~~i ~ 'T • ~ . . , ~i ~ , 3-. , , ~("ING~~; Y "r. a ' `f~,~~.r <~~~f . ~ `l`, - J"~_ p' ~1~ i ~ • i I ~ . t~• ' ~ . . - `r ~ ' - t ' [~-_P~{ y~,~1{, e, 1--,.. _ ~a t•. `t • • a _ l~~ z`~ e~. r ♦ ''r~t ~ ` , V ~ G.1~~ `%lj+'. ~ ~ ~ • ~ .5~~ . • J + ~ ' ' a ~/~1 j y( ) • ~ t `.r ~ :'a ~ +:r.t tizs ~ ~ • S i 7~~ l . i M~{ ~ ~~rr. • ~ • ' . ~ t ,3' + : t ~ ~,y ~ .}~i _ ' ' ' ~ • l l~`""c`i ~l.x _ ~ , ` v9 ~A ' ` v~ t ' ,.E~K- • _ . ~ „ ,e ~ ~ ~ f ~1. ~ .,t ~ y, y' ~a~;~'E.yr, i-y,~~,/~ i~~+~r ti ~ 's ~i f~ ~ ~1 . ~ + ' ~ ' '~,ea ~ 'Z~~'~;A>= • y • - .~(~,`t t~•~~?' '~~!(~`"`',yy~'~T!'1i~•~~fi ~R. ' • _ • ~ • • ~ it'~ :Si ?Aa : .'J~.. . ' f.'' n J4 '~3' t~~yy . _ . . . , . j - . - ~ , _ • _ . , • ,•"f y , e , • ~t(~ /"~~lYl v *~f( ~ - + 't r ~ ~ ~ f~ T A ~T~, lv`'~' ~ ` ^ f ' • ~ - i ` ~ ^ ` o. l°•/. '}y, r ~J~L~~ 'r'*~j t41 J ~ sp~'.~~ ~ X° - ~ f a d' ' " ' • ^ 3+{~ ~ w ;Yl • ~ ' Y a~ ~ ` ~~r,. . `s'. I .~t~ y'~~ ~sh'"~-`~wt • ' k ~+~x`r ~r`'~`, »~`ri'~ . . ' . f, ' » r ~ . ~ . , ~ ~ , f ~ r °o~ r - . . . ~'t r_ P. • ~ - - _ a, 7sx' t ^ _ _ . , • r'.` _ . , ' ,y'~ ` ~ s i • ' t `-1~ . - ` ' • ' _ . ; ` . , ~ , • ' ~z ' ~ ~ . , ~ . - . _ ' ~ - ~ • t ~ ~ ~ ' ♦ ~ ' y ; - - ~ • Y , I ' 1 • 1 ' . ' . ' . . , . STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PIATS SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT b SPOKANE COUNTY PIANMNG COMMISSION I. Planninp Commission; (P-1) That the plat be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or attached - sheets as noted. (P-2) That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than one dweli- ing structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites without filing a replat.- (P-3) That the plat provide for right of way width for street s as indicated on the preliminary plat of record. (P-9) That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A 1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border Lhe plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries.) (P-5) That appropriate street names be indicated. ~ " ' ' . • : ~ . . (P-6) That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved preliminary plat for distrfbution to the Planning Department and the utility oompanies. Written ap- , proval of the easements by the utility company must be received prior to the submittal. . of the final plat: . - ' - (P-7) That a plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be app`roved by the water sup- plier and fire protection district,. :Said water plan must also have been approved by the ' appropriate heaith authorities.. The'health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will certify, prior.to the filing of the final plat, on the-face of - said water plan. that-the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will ade- - quately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be draft- . ed on,a transparency suitable for reproduction. _ • The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy of said water plan - that appropriate contcactual arrangements have been made with the plat _sponsor for con- _ struction,of the`~yater system, in accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance- with a`time'sche&We. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of - the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to applica- tion for building permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a , provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactor- ily complete the approved water system. I - The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local fire district and pur- veyor will be installed within this plat, and the subdfvider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot. (P-8) That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the filing of the final plat. (P-9) That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to , (P-10) That the status of the parcel in the plat designated as be fndicated on the final plat and in the dedication, and that the staff be allowed to work with the sponsor to determine its best use and future status. (Continued) • STANDARD CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLATS SPOKANE COUNTY PI,ANrTING DEPARTMENT & SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The following items are related to the open space: a) The sponsor shall submit the proposed form of the legal documents for contfnued retention, development, and maintenance of alI common open space land prior to the filing of the final plat; which documents shall provide, among other things, for a minimum assessment of inembers of a home owners' association for such open space development and maintenance, said documents to be approved_by the Planning Director prior to filinq of the final plat. - b) The areas shown as recreation area end/or site, etc., must be'accurately de- fined and given lot and block numbers . The final plat will show the future owner-. ' ship status of parcels to be soId, parceis to remain public (i.e. , sewer treat- ment site) and parcels to remain in common ownership. c) That the sponsor, prior to filing of the final plat, provide for mfnirnum improve- ment of the common open space land; such improvements will be accamplished . at the sponsor's expense and shall include proper guarantee of minimum stand- . ards of improvement (for example: turfing and adequate sprinkling system) which ~ shall be approved by the Planning Director. S F L e d) If a final plat is to be filed that does not include the entire area proposed for . platting on the preliminary plat`af record, then the first finai plat filed will in- ~ • clude the recreation area and the sewer treatment site. ` - • ' - ' (P-T1)- Written approval of the location-of inqress and eqress connectfons'to'the State High- ' .;r- way must be received from the State Hi'ghway Department prior'to filinq'of the final ' plat. = - , , , • ; J . : , , _ , = y ~ _ . . ~ , , - r. (P-12) That an avigation easement satisfactory- to-the Spokane Airport Boardbe'provided for = . . rv ~ ' the benefit of,Fairchiid Air Force 8ase'and Spokane International Airport. _ _ , " ;°ri , - , • ' . _ . . . : ' , , . , • ~ (P-13) That a declaration of Nori-Significance `be=lssued, in accordance with Section 11.15. 340 of the Spokane County 'Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior to approval of t?iis recommendation by the- Board of County Commissioners, or that any approving action , of the Board be conditfoned upon issuance of Final Declaration of Non-Significance in accordance with SCEO 11. 15. 340. ` ° . . ' NOTE: The' officia3 file `can'tains an environmental checklist for the proposal and a,_, f- ~ staff review of.their checklist as required by WAC 197-10-320, II. En4lneer's (E- 1) That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of right of way to the public and approval of the road system fn the plat by the County Engfneer. (E- 2) That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat. (E- 3) That drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and aliqnmeni of drain- age facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construCtion and the filing of a final plat. (E- 4) Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be responsible for perpet- uating all evidence of the location of survey monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certi- ficate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all dfsturbed monuments have been replaced. (E- S) No construction work is to be performed with the Pubiic Right of Way until a permlt has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection ana approval by the County Engineer. (Continued) 4k ~ STANDARD CONDITTONS FOR APPROVAL OF PRELIMINARY PLATS SPOKANE COUNTY PIANNING DEPARTMENT & SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (E- 6) All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to filing the final plat or a Dond in the amount estimaied by the County Engineer to Cover uie Cosi oi con- , struction of improvements, construction certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with the County Engineer. . ' (E- 7) No direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time as additional right of ways are dedicated and roads are established as County Roads : (E- 8) No direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads. - (E- 9) Road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for 1/2 rights of ways ' and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the developer. - (E-10) That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a design proposal ac- • ~ ceptable to the State Highway Department of the proposed State Hiqhway-County Road intersection. State Highway Department approval of the proposed,design must be re-. ;,,,ceived prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the responsibility of the sponsor and mayeither be constructed, or abond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to.the County Engineer,in the~amount as determined _by the County Engineer and the State Highway, Department. III. - ' ` , , ' • : ~ . 4 ~ - - ' • , Assessor r , _u , ' 4 , , f • r , ,,'J',: ^ ` ~r ' T ' t " r - (A- 1) That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be approved by . the County Assessor and the Planning,staff. ~ . IV. Health Department - ' ' kari - ' _ ~ ' - ~ ' . , " - - ~ . . ::~si~r, ~ , . ♦ y 1 K ' • r . r C-i-1) That each lot be authorized for the use of lndlv[dual on-site sewage disposal systems. (H-2) The dedtcatory language of the plat will state the sponsor wlll assume no responsibil-- tty for provislon of domesttc water. - , (H-3) That conditional approvral be given subject to provlslons ln the plat for a publtc sewer " system. Approval of the design of sald systems must be given by County and State Health authorlties and the County Utilltles Department prior to ftltng of the ftnal plat. A suttable guarantee wlll be requtred to cover the cost of provtding satd system in the amount as determtned by the Publtc Works Department. (H-4) That a statement be placed ln the dedlcatton to the effect that a publlc sewer system wtll be made avatlable for the plat and tndtvldual servtce wtll be provtded to each lot prtor to saleo C-I-S) Prtor to ftltng of the ftnal plat, the sponsor shall present evldence that the plat ltes wtthtn the recorded servlce area of the proposed water distrlct. (H-6) That an on-stte sewage management system be created and approved by the Spokane County Health Dlstrtct prtor to ftltng of the Flnal Plat. August 1, 1977 ~ ~ ~ t1A~Y ~4, 1"~7~ T~L,~PH~~IE 1~C~. 2']~ ~ fi~` PL,~~iNTN~G ~ON~IIS~l~N ~ Fr~i~~y, FeY~~~ua.~'y ~l~~r~~~ 1:~U ~~r~~. C~un~y ~~~,l.tY~ ~epa.rtm~nt }~~di t~az iurr~ ~ RQOm ~+t~ ~ ~r,~ ~lc,~t 1~{YI ~~~1~~~ . SCJBUIVYS~~i~ AI~i~ ~~NN~' FcECL,A~SF~CAT~ON "j~.-'~~ V~n Hee~ Addi~a.on -7 A~ri~~alt~al tn 5in~.le F~r~i1~ Resid~r~ti~,~ ~~c~ti~n: 5~~;~ti,~rY 2~, r~r~w~~iip ~j l~. r R~~e ~.W.~'i. 'ih~ ~ y'~ ~.'~~~t '1~2 ~f V~~•a~ as per• ~+l~.t r~e~:~rd~d in V~alur~~e r"(~n +~f ~1at;~} page 3~}; situa~~e in th~ t~ounty oi' S~ac,k~.ne, S~at~~ c~f W~s~~in~'~~r~. ~ S~o~sor: ~ayn~~nc~ V~n Ii~~s E. ~I "Y ~era~a~.e, WA En~in~~r: L~,wz'~~t~:e ~c~:iti~r~~i~r E. 1~~~ ~prag~ae Suit~ ~ ~pok~ne, WA y~~16 ~~~~t~ 5~~~~: Acr~es ~Iumb~r ~of l~t~: 1~+ ~an~l us~ pr~po~~d &~y ~~AS~r: ~ingJ.~ I'~rni.ly Dw~~~.ing~ ~.dv~rtisec~ ~c~n~ R~~1~,;~~ifi~:dti+~~; ~zn~~: P~~ily Resides~tial W~ter ~ot~ce: ~fer~ ic~i~~1 I~i~~:ra~t: ~~ntr~.l. iJ~a.1.~y M~thod ~r s~wa~~ dis~at~s~].: Tr~~~vidual ~tt-~i~e ~~.spo~r~ systetns ~n:~irc~r~en~a]. T~u~ar:t: A ta~~ic of ~isc~ssz~r~ a~ ~l~is h~arin~ may b~ wk~~t;~k~Y~ c~r n~~ ~;I~i~ }~r~~>~~a1. w~ll ha~~ ~i~if'~cant a~.~rerse ~r~virc~n~nenta.~ irn~~ct;. + ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ' , ~rk~? I ~ ~p~M ~ 1~ r~ , ~ , ~ t~l~ 'n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T ~+I w~ R:~ ~ ~ , l~.-~'. ~►r~i0Cl4► q r ~ +~r++ I.3ill ~ . TH~ ~ ~ ~7, ~ ~ 1~~' ~ ~ ~ ~yr~ n.~i ~ T ~1 T H _M , ~ _ " J W rie_Trv ~va . ~ ~ I ~ f y~R'~~~ M1~ . ~ y ; h i~~ J r~i G~ . ~ r`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IM AVf w% ~ ~ J ~ i Tf~ J a ~ f t•.w - d i F I,~rs~~~ ~~f / ~ Q . /J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 11A r~~ ~ ~ y ~ I~~~ ~~n~ ~ . ~ ~ ~j ~ ~ ~ . eY' I O~I Nl~ ~1~ ~ 50 ~ L F G~ L f~ : S 1 P T~ ~ V ~ I 5 T- - ~ E 8 R lJ A R Y 9►r • - - - - - v ~ ~ 1~1 f SPQK~►N~ C71~ ~Y E4'~ LA ~ ~~L~ o . P ►~t~~~ ~~~UI~~N~' ~ . _ I~ MB=R h~ N " 0~~#"~ L~ ~1 ~D~~~'~IPTION QF P~ P,RTY ~A~PA~'~~ l~ . Nl1 9~ SS~55~Q ~ G l. e~. ~ . _ ~i . . V~f~ H~ ~ A X ~3~43 lA~~ i ~14~,1C ~t C bN HEt~ VER►~ E1/Z B1T2 SP~l~kN~ ~t7llN'~"Y ~'LANIVII~Ci CUMM[~~14~1 ~S C ~ ~ 4C~~ 5 1~~H t~11~ PaOF~~t`~Y t?W'~ER~ t~~~'lF'I~~ VE~At~AL~ wA ~49~}~7 _ ~ _ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~A~c ~ ~3~~3-~8~2 ~~~~~"iB ~ ~~AN V~~A '~11~ 81~~ F~~~~MA~ ~P~NIE J B~': _ _ ~ c ~ 14~ 1~ 1~TH AY~E _ - Vf RA~AL~ !~~~e _._"~'40~~? ~j ~ - R F F F i~ M_ ` K 0 ~6 Z 3 5~~-':~ i~,~ 3+~ Q C~~►~~ H S I~ t T~ R Y~ ~ 4 N 1 7'~ fi t i T~ F I,~ ~ 1!~ S~ i V B , , ~11~ af BLI( 1~3 ~b ~ ~ ~ r r ~~'~43-4g17 730~6ZA046q ~c~B H SUTT~R Y~.~A ~1f~ ~1F ~LK ~T~ ~X~ S~1T'~~R ~O~ER~' ~ , + ~ ~ , } ~ f ~ - - - t~1~5 ~F :12~5 ~ t~(~ 1~14~ ~ 1~"~~ 1~ H A E VE~R,~~AI~ 4~A ~~~7 _ . r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 \ ~ . V ~ ~ . . ~~5~3 G4~Di 7~~TZ~+~~S~ ~~aIE ~4l.ST~JN YtRA E~~~ T~15 l. S I~ I = E 4 i H V 1 t~ 1 I~T A~ ~ v~q~l~A A 99037 I~ ~ i~ = 6 - - - - r f 7 ~ ~G ~354~-14~1~ 4~6133 R VdN 1#E~'S IIE~iA W1 Z B~ ~ ~S C E 1~C' 12?4~ AVE _ - - - - ~ ~ . V~!~ ALE 1~ 90~7 . ~3543-1U01 9f~b~3~ _ C _ ~4~~5 Y~~A ~~l~' 9~~~ V~►~.~HE~S ~A - ~ E ~ ~i~ Z H AV~ V~ ~4l 99~37 ---~3~4~- ~€~4 ~i 3~~ ~ u~ ~TT ~~Ra w~r2 0~ w1r~ ~ ~~Ur~~~TT ~+~~~US ~ 1 ~ ~ , L K ~ 1 ~ 4~t~T 1 T~ ~~I~ ~ ~ V~RAC~~L~ '~t~ ~~~7 ~~~43-11~C~ 7~iC'~~~~~93 ~ARR J BUCN~R Y~~+4 :11~ ~F +~112 ~Q~I1'~9t~ - ~ ~ ~i6~ ~~(C N~Z~FT 20~41653~' 1''~ ~ ► ~ - ~37 ~~~~►.~-~~o~~ ~ r~~ w~~~~~ ~+u~` ~~v ~K t~~ ~ 7 ~ 5 ~i I~ J'~ trv.~ ~ E~9~. Ffi - _ _ _ _ ~~6 0~1 $ 9 - ~ ~ _ . ~~~~r~-~7~7 #~~Tb~~9C D E FITZGE~AID Y~R~4 ~lT~ !Ct]~~ ~ ~ 36.2F ~F N~24. ~F~' T~ ~7l LX~ Y~ i~F ~J$I.TFT 4~G 2~1~6~ 'Ue' ~ 3 ~ _ 1`l3t~ v ~r~r~r~ a~~~ ~xc aurr~r~~ wr~~i~ ~ 9?F~ 6~~( 13b F~lF ~~2~i ~T QF ~Th1 ~ 7 ~LY~ 4~ ~F E 14~Q~ 1~~~4 AVE E 3 I. _ C~ T 1~ - - - ~ 7~T j VE~A~ALE ~I~4 9~~37 E 3 1. ~354~-~~'~~ ~'~~~,~~b'~4~5 ~T~V~+~ ~ 5U~5~K ~~i1I ~I~~ 9.3 82 SI~ER~'~G~ ~ R~6~R~5 _ ~ t~ 3lb ' ~ 543~-~T~4 T7~}~1T~391 ~ G L. H~RS~ ~H~ i.4 B~ HERS~ ~~G~R L ~ _ ~ _ ~ 14~,11 ~~~H AYE YERAaA~E W~ 94~~~' ' ~~3~4 -~7'0'~ T7'~+~16~'~45 C A~~ hi G~~I~~° P~ L~ I 5U8 L5 B~ ~I~~~ii~I~'~ ~ RQ~~RTS - ~ ~ L ~ ~H ~9 ~ 313 . ~ ~ ~ _ , I~ ~~~~43-~$U8 7T041~67~18 ~~r d ~d~~t~k ~~HI ~U~ B~ S~~~I~~~[~ ~ ~~B~~T~ 10 31~.C~ . ~`~Jl~ J,~" ~ ~ o - - - - ~ ~ - ; . . y ~ ~ . . 77 ~t}~~~~ k'' ~"~Y;~ ' L~Ffi .rl.~~ J~ .;!~F~~ ~~`'4~ W . ~ o . ~ , 10 ~139~ ~ r` ° Z35~r3-~1~0'4 T~}b1~8B LAT ~R p~0.~' ST C~ Y~RA 'S3b1.~~T ~F TH~ ~~2FT I? ~ CHU~~H ~ ' ~ T ~ M~ 1 1~ ~ ~I~R~~I ~E~~ , TR 18Z~ 53b1.2F~ OF TH~ W~/~ R I3~ L~ HE T~ T ~k~ t L 6 G~ L~ ~t QF TH~ ~3b~1.2~~ 1'H~R~f~'~ SAl1' C~T1~ !l1T 84i'~~ _ - ~ ~3~4~-21~1 b177~1~~ S~HD~~. I5~` 3~~ YE~~4 ~F ~LItS 183-~~4 ~C~NT'RAl. Vl'~ ~CH D~5T3'~b ~ V F i F T .~VCS~~ ~R 18~i S T2~ ~O~I~I~~ ~a i~cSF~ 0 25 ~ E~l~ R 1~3~ - . _ - P ~ ~ 5 ~~ANE ~I~ 9~ b ~ t ! Y-- H[3 f 3~b ~~~►4J-~1~~ ~~~~~1 S~~Q(~~ ~ 5T ~~6 VER~ ~T i~F 9~'~3 i84 ~t12 ~~Id ~S n r~ ~ ~x~ w~ ~fi ~xc ~z~~~: r~ iea ~~cc N~~~~ s ~a~~~~ ~ ~ SP N~ ~IA ~ ~46 s~n~~Rr o~~a: ~~~u~ ~~~~s ~~~c~~s ~~t►rr ~.~~s M~ ss o~e~ z~.o~~a 5~ ~ ~ - ^ - - - _ - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ~ . _ _ _ - g~ - s - ~ - - - - _ ~ _ , ~ . ~ , - - _ _ - ~ _ - - - r ~ - - - - - _ _ _ . r~ ~ ~ ! : - ~ - - - - . _ ~ - - - - - 1 ! i PE-1176-78 and ZE-21-78 In the matter of a hearing to consider the application of Raymond C. Van Hees, E. 14025 - 12th Veradale, WAshinqton, to file a plat to be known as Van Hees Addition. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from AgricuJ.tural to Single Family Residential on the property descrfbed b elow, such zone change to become effective only upon the fflfng of a ffnal plat, or plats of such property. The propzrty being platted fs described as the E 1/2 of Tract 172 of Vera, as per plat recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, page 30; situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washxngton. (Approximately 900 febt ea st of Evergreen Road, and south of Twelfth Avenue.) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTIIVG STATE O F WAS HINGTON ) ) ss C4UNTY OF SPOKANE ) S: d~ - WSAM A td~~ , betng first duly swor.i on oath, deposes and says: That I am a cittzen of the Untted States of America, and a resldent of the Stite of Washtngton over the age of 18 years. That on the -~kL~day of J0~0 , 19-2-, I personall.,r ' posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and lncor,.)orated herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING in a conspicuous manner at eE ch of the following locations, to-wit: ~ ~ 1 • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~%~v~- &Jw -t 2. ~ t~ ~ 4Ae ~ A-* 3 , VO 49*006 4' d ~ u-- ~ ~ DATED THIS DAY OF lg • 4w~ r SIGNEU Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of ~ 1 ~a N,otary Public in and for the State of Washtngton, restdtng at Spokane, Washingtot r 4 a~E co~,y~ , yF.r SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Offi ce Communi cati on ~jH O~S Date: December 29, 1977 T0: Spokane County Planning Commission ~ FROM: Eug e~ha p, R.S. and Eugene C. Prather, R.S. SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat - VAN HESS 1. References: a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 60' by Lawrence Leinweber; December 21, 1977, received by this office December 22, 1977. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and • Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Re- sources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the Spokane Valley, D. K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metropolitan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Logs of Vera Water District wells in Township 27, Range 44, Sections 23, g. Field Survey Report, Gene Sharp, Spokane County Health District, Decem- ber 27, 1977. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973 and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973. , 2. Topography, soils and water. a. This project lies in a relatively flat area borderin$ 12th Avenue on north and 121' east, and west of Best Road and 138' south of 13th Avenue. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. No private well found within 100' of plat. Two wells belonging to Vera Water District ~M located in excess of four (4) blocks to the boundary of this proposed plat. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to S% slopes. They have a septic tank f ilter f ield limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and (:i) gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated SCHD-ADM-118 0 vAN HEss Page 2 December 29, 1977 glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. d. The data from 2 Vera [Jater District wells in the area shows the wells are 122 to 176 feet deep and have 3400 to 5400 gpm. The total nitrogen level was 1.214 ppm. The Vera Water District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. a. The plat sponsor has proposed 14 lots on 4.9 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of signif icance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alterna- tives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the eff ect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In norinal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment e£fluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constitu- ents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank eff luents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of ground- water f low line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentrarion is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."--"The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the pres- ent impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.214 ppm. A projected incremental / a ~E~I$IT B~ d DE~CRx~,,rx~,N lat recorde I,EGAl' ,~era , as per Tract 172 0f 30* o fVas~hingt°n - te EaSt r,alf af glats , p e okane, Sta T h e vo1~e e co~~ t y a f p ~ th Situate in r hM1 p ~ ~w ~'1~' S "~"d 178 ~ ~ tlCpil ` `r4~~ V ~ L t!J ~ i i E X H I13IT p PRELIMINARY PLAT APPLTCATION FORM AREA AND DISTANCE •ooooo0000000000oooooaooooo000oooooaooooo0000000000oooooqooooo0 Totul air►ouni, ot land in this Subdivision: 4.9 Acres Proposed density of the P1at: .35 Lots/Gross Acre '_L'otal amount of adjoininLr, land controlled by this owner or sponsor: 10 Acres Pl-oposed use of conrrolled adjoining land: Farmina Wtlat is the drlving distance in miles to the nearest fire station? 1.75 SIiopping facilities? 1 Municipal Boundary: 6 Paved street or highway? U LAND USE ■OOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOOOOOOOO0 OOOOOOOOqOQ00000000000000000000000000000000 lndYCate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Family Dwelli.ngs ( X). Duplexes ( Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi-f'amily dwelling units ( Indicate which lots: MoUile Jfomes ( Other ( Describe other uses: Describe any non-residential use proposed in the Plat: What is the pa.•esent use of the property proposed to be platted? Acrr _ List type of uses: Cultivated land: 4.9 acres. Pasture:• acres. Timber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres ~ ~ I s keeping of aiiimals desired. No ( Ye~. ~ (x T~pe: Domestic IMPROVEMENTS •OOooooo000000oooooODODOOOOOOOOOO00ooooDOOOOOOOOO00ooo0oOOOO00oqooo Do you plan to fxle the Plat in its entirety as pr-oposed, or will it be a multi-phase dev- elopment? Filed in its entiretv To what level oF xmprovement will streets be constructed? Gravel ( Minimumo Curb anci Gravel ( Curb and Paved ( X). Describe any combinations of above: What is the time period expected for complete development of the Plat: 1 vr. Street -_mprovements completed? 1 Yr. . . Substantial number of lots occupied? 1 yr . Is dedi.:ation of any land for public use contemplete3? (Parks, schools, etc.) No. ( X Yes ( Describe: Indicate the size of units proposed to be constructed: 80 0- 120 0 - Square feet Number of bedrooms 2 -4 . Will buildings be built on the lots before they are sold: No ( x). Yes ( Will any special deed restrictions be included in tne X)• Yes C I f "yes", explain : rE t tlolv JAN 16 7~t8 UTILITTES ■ooooo00ooo00nooo0O0oooo000000ooooDO§WMIR?oey6f RJ~ooo000000000000oo0DO0 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Indicate the proposed method of sewage disposal : Septic tankc ( x). Lagoon ( Treatment plant ( Other, or -combinations (Describe) Yndlcate the proposed source of water supply: Individual wells ( Public system ( X). Prlvate community system ( Indicate method of extending service to the lots (Dwellings): Underground utility easecnents ( X). Overhead utility easements ( Utilities in streets ( x). No easeroents ( Indicate the distance from this proposal to the nearest existing water maln: on s ite feet Indicate size of nearest main: 10 & 12 Inches. List utility companies or districts expected to provide service to this Plat: ~ Electricity: Vera Gas: WWP Water: Vera Phone: 924-3800 E X 111 BI"1' A Fage 2 PRELrMIIVARY PLAT AFl'LICATIUN FORM (Continued) ACKNQWL,EIDGMENT~ MC3('C3E3C300C]C)aE3f]DC]O{3DOO❑Q[7QC3QQC7[]00CI[]❑OL7C]fl00000OQO[]DC3[]0aG700❑Oa❑OQC3ODt pROP+aSED PLAT NANiE : Van He~ds T f the undersigned, have catnpleted the infarmativn requested, and the Fre].iminaxy Plat has heen pi•epared by me under rny superv~sian in accordance with the requirements af t;he Spoka.ne County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washingtan. E/ (Sagne d) Date : 12/27/7 7 ~~k' • ~ , (Address) East 1-2929 SpracFue Suite C Phone : 926-2839~ °V * ~ .5p_Q]j,aI7e. Wa• Z1F a 99216 sITR~OR FAL : please pr nt I, e, 4711 e 5 the sponsor Qf this proposed subdivision, am the ' - e~ ~r (X ; builder agent ( ) ; option holder ( ) ; contract halder ( of the property proposed ta be platted and ha.ve completed t'he infarmatian requested af me and do hereby testify that it is correct and accurate. ~ (Signed,)-' Date. (Ad41Y'~'r ss) J f ~ )'-4 ~~hodle: I ~~p• / L~ 1 Oa. 1 + ~ &171'/ ~l~ARY ~ - D3te; 74po/ N{./ llis i ~ SEAL• ~ Special Cornments• ~ 0000000000000000000■ rY'HIS PART TO BE CC}MPLETEI3 BY PLANVING DEPAR`3.'MIINT OC00=00000013000000 PLANNING DEPARTMENT INFORnATT ON ~ r Date Submitted; Checked by: School Dsstrict: Prelima.nary Plat Fee: , Existing Zoning; Rl C ~ ~ ~ J'Z P, 1._ Date established; ~ Zone Change File No.: Advertised Zone Uggx,ading: Number of Lots= Locatian: Sectian,~,3 Toamship R~ge-qq ~~i ~ Plat Ari~e No Q : __W Plat Name : J0 - ~ h ~ r, r~ , I ~1~ ~ y~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ 1~~. ~ ~ ; : ~ -~i > p~~ , ~,ti ' l ~ I i ~ I~ } , ~ 1 "F , V~~' ~1~ ; ~ ~ , ! ~ r i` :~"s` ~ ~ i ~i i f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 . ' I i . I l~ ~ ,f llJr y p t ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ I ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~M ~ ~ ~~r, r~ ~ ~ ~ ' i . r~~ r,, ~ ~'~i ~3 ~ `