The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1225-78 & ZE-126-78 , s • y . ~ ~ ' • i • N0. 9 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHZNGTON. pE--1 225-78 IN 'r"HE MATTER OF FilING THE FIN1L PLAT ~ OF Bp.GHER; S tAUQI'TIUN LOC4TED IN SECTION ~ 15 s TOWIi'SH I P 2514 , RANGE ~ ~ . W . M. S-POMiE COUilTY, WA►SHXNGTON ~ ' R E S 0 L U T I 0 N ) ) ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BQARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKA.NE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the final plat of , BELCNER'S ADDITT4N , T~e West 112 af tte Tract 122 af Opportu~ity a:.~recorded n Yol ume "K" of Pl ats, Page 2200, 3n Spakare County, WashiNLon, 1acated in the $1/2 4f Soction 15, 'Ccrwnship 25M, Range 44 E.W.Ml, Spcikane Coun't,y, Washir~gton, more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a separate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS ~J DAY OF 19~BOARD OF COUNTY C014MISSIOWERS OF SPOKANE COUPJTY, WASHINGTON . , - 1ERRY C. KOPET ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND 4Cl -of the Board By. ~i . .a».... r. pp},..Ni..,.~.t ~!'y~`¢di'~'t . `-9-~~~ . ' : I °INAI. PLA1' ClMC:K L1ST . . I . Yijidl Nlat Wroyed ~ 1 . Suudivisiun lidliiu C) . 5uc,tiUn, LOwiiSt»N & rcillcJu oSIso(s) iiuli«: 00 9. SP ~ 5 . Eti9indur ur survtlyor 6. Sheet sizd 29" X 36" 7. North No1 nt ,sc alu (100' - l" or 2 00 1") ~ 8. Boundary l.ine 9. i.ocatton 6 widths ot propoeed streets, alleys, rights „0 ~ , of wdy, edsainerits, parke, open spacas, 6 proper lak,eliny of spdcds to be dedlceted to the public lU. l.ayout b nan►ds of ad/otning Bubdlvistons a. RaNldts - Ldyout & Name of the replat ~ y shall bu ahown by dashed llnes 11 . 5treet ridme5 - cunsistent wiih extsttng streets lll CltY diid cuuiity. - Check aq.Wnst nantes on round i►v►me wheel, ~ 12.- Lot etzes - i. e., 80' X 125' wtth 10,000 sq. Et. for single tdmily lot Cul De Sdc;s - 8U' at buildiny line I s. Layout, numbcr5, d~-id dinidnsions of lats 6 ~v parcel s h` - 14. Nectsssdcy etnyljicuriny cic►ta 15. UOeS ded1Ld[tUl1 5tdtu if ijtidividudl wtitdc anci/or kv public sewers will ►,e NrovLdeci in accordance wlth pcolln►ll►ary Plat of apNroval. lb . Notagizdcf GUrttltcallun by a protesbjoiidl lancf y surve yor . 17. !'rlvate ra btr ic;tiarls,Lt dity 1 d, NuinWr dnci tyNu ut unity - ly . Uvdfcdtic,n c,i 5lrvwts to the Nublic S~ - ,lU. Edyemdr►t vetltli(At1011 6 llluyirotlon ~ powe r ~ l1 clouds on Nropdrty, , atc. ~ ~--jrc,in '1'itld Ftt;Nuit - ~'r' . - - - - _ . - - - ~ ~ _ - - ~ F R,C A, R ECEIVEV A U G 2 1979 ~ ~ SPOitANE COUNTY ~ , PLANNING DEPARTMENT . First American Title Company of Spokane MAIN OF,FICE ESCROW OFFICE West 704 Fcrst Avenue North 8611 Dcvcstort • Sucle B Spvkane, 1Vashington 99204 Order No . 20478 Spokane, Washengton 99208 Phone: (509) 456-0550 ccs : Simpson Engineers Phone. (509) 484-1600 Spokane County Planning Spokane County Engineer SECOND AMENDED PLAT CEF.TiFICATE To: Marvin Belcher Belcher's Addition E. 13717 Valleyway Spokane, WA Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of August 1, 1979 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: The West half of Tract 122, Vera, according to plat recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington, Excepting therefrom the East 89 feet of the South 320 feet. Located in the South half of Section 15, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M. This company certifies that record title is vested in JERALD M. BELCIiER AND CAROL A. BELCHER, Husband and wife, as to that portion of the West half of Tract 122 of Vera, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the West half of said Tract 122; thence South along the East line of said West half to a point 320 feet North of the Southeast corner of said West half; thence West parallel with the South line of said Tract 122, a distance of 89 feet; thence South parallel with and 89 feet distant from the East line of said half, 320 feet to the South line of said Tract 122, thence West along the South line of Tract 122, 104 feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with the Westerly line of asphalt driveway of the same now located; therce Northerly along the Westerly line of said driveway to a point of intersection with the West line of the East 210 feet of the said West half at a point 71 feet, more or less, North of the South line of said Tract 122; thence North along the West line of said East 210 feet to a point 320 feet North of the South line of said Tract 122; thence West along the North line of the South 320 feet of said Tract 122 to the West line of said Tract 122; thence North along said West line to the Northwest corner of said Tract 122; thence East along the North line of said Tract 122 to the point of beginning. GARY E. ALMSTROM as his sole and separate property as to the South 320 feet of the West half of Tract 122, Vera, according to plat recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane County, Washington, Except the East 210 feet thereof; Also that part of said West half of said Tract 122 of Vera, described as follows: Affiliated wrth First Amc9WVQuiance Company < ~ Page 2 Order No. 20478 Beginning at a point in the South line of said Tract 122, 210 feet West of the Southeast corner of the West half of said Tract 122; thence East along said South line 17 feet, more or less, to a point of intersection with the Westerly line of asphalt driveway as the same is now located; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said driveway to a point of intersection with the West line of the L•'ast 210 feet at a point 71 feet, more or less, North of the point of beginning of the West half of said Tract 122; thence South along said West line to the point of beginning. Free from all liens, encumbrances and objections, except as follows: 1. GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1979 Amount: $439.75, last half Tax Account No.: 15544-1207 GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1979 Amount: $399.20, last half Tax Account No.: 15544-1205 2. Provisions contained in Contract between Vera Electric lqater Company, D.K. McDonald, et al, and Vera Land Company, dated April 25, 1908, recorded in Book "H" of Contracts, Page 292. 3. DEED OF TRUST: Grantor: Gary E. Almstrom, and Carol L. Almstrom, husband and wife Trastee: First American Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Association Original Amount: $27,900.00 Dated: September 4, 1975 Recorded: September 5, 1975 Auditor's File No.: 7509050257 4. MORTGAGE: Mortgagor: Gary E. Almstrom, an individual Nlortgagee: Washington Trust Bank, a corporation Original Amount: $2,000.00 Dated: November 23, 1977 Recorded: December 6, 1977 Auditor's File No.: 7712060040 *CONTINUED* ~ ~ Page 3 Order No. 20478 NOTES: l. Irrigation Assessment of $38.00 by Vera Irrigation District #15 for 1979, is Paid in Full. Affects: 15544-1207 Irrigation Assessment of $38.00 by Vera Irrigation District #15 for 1979, is Paid in Full. Affects: 15544-1205 Said premises lie within the boundaries of Vera Irrigation District ##15 and are subject to future assessments by said District. This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CONPANY OF SPOKANE . ~ Title Officer Fred Trochimowi~ FT/sb yQ6~~~~nc, 924439CI`4, n6 Vfv6~T En ?owor ~!J~ \I+~•~Y ~ ~Lr~\v/~/ 6;. , 'ti(X~ tV~~ :.zf:r , N J. <<3DAi. WASHlitlC'iTON 9907 August 2, 1979 Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 Re: Belcher's Addition Dear Sir: This letter is to verify that the above subdivision lies within the boundaries of Vera Water and Power District. Water and power can be supplied, providing the developer complies with the District s policies and construction standards. Sincerely, VERA WATER & POWER 1 ; William J. obb Assistant Manager WJJ : cmb ccs: Simpson Engineers Gerald Belcher #132.1 #950.79 Z ~ Pacific Northwest Bell June 12, 1979 ~ZZ~ Spokane County Planning Commission North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 RE: BELCHER'S ADDITION Gentlemen: Pacific Northwest Bell will not require utility easements within the plat of Belcher's Addition. G. D. Fleming Right-of-Way Agent North 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washingtcn 99202 GDF:bh cc: Tim Brewer ~ - y.~. ^ htrR~ ' Q C~ ♦ SUPPLEMENTAL REPORT ~ n,o. z OUFI ORDER No 2 0 4 78 YOUa LOAN/ESCROW No. (Mortflagor) (Purchaser) Belcher' s Addition To• tlaxvin Belcher CCS: Simpson Engineers E. 13717 Valleyway Spokane County Planning Spokane, Washington Spokane County Engineer Thero have boen no chenges in the title to the proprrty r,overed by our preliminary report sinCe except as followa l. First half gEneral taxes for 1979 are paid. 11f fects : Parcel 1 ' First half general taxes for 1979 are paid. Af:fects: Pzrcel 2 2. Srrigatian assessments as to Parcels 1 and 2 for Vera Irrigation District No. 15 are paid in full for 1.979. . ECE I IV ED t►~y 111197 9 SPOKANC C~~ ~MEI~~ PLANNIi+IG DEPAR eated JutiCG`6 _1979 at8oonM FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SPOKANE WE5T 704 FIRST AVE, mr_ SFOKANE, WASHINGTON 99204 . _ , e Y r A T 104 "Larqc oiinugh tv serve you - small enouph to know you. " . a 1 A Ni rq~c . SUPPLEME111TAL REPORT rv ~ o. ~ . 20478 OUR ORDER Nn YOUR LOAN/ESCROW No (Mortgagor) '(Purchaser) Ee 1 c he r S• l~,dd 1 t].OI1 To. Marvin Belclier ccs : Simpson Engineers E. 1J717 Valleyway Spokane County Planning City " Spokane County Engineer Thrre have boen no changes {n thP title to the property covpreci bV our preliminary report since Apri 1 24, 1979 except as iollows. _l. Paragraph No. 6 has been dEleted from our report. ~ c E I v E JU N 14 1979 SPOKANC COUN i Y PLANNIftlG DEPARTMENT June 6 1979 oated et g oo n M , FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY OF SF'OKANE V}1 WEST 704 FIRST AVE. SI'aF;A E, WnSI11NG'fON 99204 • E3 Y _ _ ► ~ .J ~ 1 ~ _ P n 7 tn4 "Larqe enorIqh to serve yau - smaU enouvh to know you " ~ Yelephone 924-3800 Distribufors o6 lNa9eP ~ Power - . ~ 601 NORTH LvERGaEEN VERADALE, wASH6cvL;T()N 99037 May 18, 1979 - ~ ~ L Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Re: Belcher's Addition Dear Sir: This letter is to verify that the easements as shown on the final plat are acceptable to the Vera Water & Power District. Sincerely, VERA WATER AND POWER William J. Jobb Assistant Manager WJJ : cmb dd : Manfred & Ward (Bob Bethards) ~ ~ ;~,f~ t✓ A ~ Id '9 P~qNpo1(aty~ IVIlV~ o£POUfvTy ARrM fNT P r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _Aa SPOKAiVE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRIC", I nter-Offi ce Communi cati on Date : May 11 , 1979 TG: Spokane County Planning FRO`fi: Denni s Krol 1 , SUaJECT: Proposed Preliminary Plat - Belchers Addition , 1. References : a. Our memo to you July 31, 1978 subject as above. b. Our memo to you Sept. 8, 1978 subject as above. c. Revised final plat map of subject dated April 1979. 2. Recommendations: a. Paragraph 3 of refe rence 1 a is amended to read "....has proposed 12 lots on 4.16 Acres." b. Paragraph 4 c of reference 1 a is amended to read "....a total of (15) fifteen dwelling units." c. A scale site development plan identifying structures, drainfields, accessory building, etc. shall be submitted for review for lots 1& 2 Block 2 and Lots 6& 7 Block 1 prior to final plat. dm c: Simpson Engineers ,o~ ~ it'Lop 14191(3 tzoN~ SQpKP►GN~ pEQ pRlMENI P~NN~N Slt"HD-AGNi-I 18 A Nt It . ~ rr.Z ~ ~ ~xfiL- ~ First American Title Company of Spokane MAIN OFFICE FSCROW OFFICE til'est 704 First Avenue North 8611 Dcuesaon • Suite B Sl~vkartc, I~Vashrngtota 99204 Order No. 20478 SpokQne, jVashcngton 9920$ Photte. (509) 456-0550 ccs : Simpson Engineers Phorie• (509) 484-1600 Spokane County Planning Spokane County Engineer FIRST AMENDED PLAT CERTIFICATE To: Marvin Belcher Belcher's Addition E. 13717 Valleyway Spokane, WA Gentlemen: , This is a certificate as of April 24, 1979 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: PARCEL l: That portion of the West half of tract 122 of Vera, described as follows: Beginning at the NorthEast corner of the West half of said Tract 122; thence South along the East line of said West half to a point 320 feet North of the Southeast cornEr of said West half; thence West parallel with the South line of said Tract 122, a distance of 89 feet; thence South parallel with and 89 feet distant from the East line of said half, 320 feet to the South line of said Tract 122, thence west along the South line of Tract 122, 104 feet, more or less, to thE point of intersection with the West- erly line of asphalt driveway of the same now located; thence Northerly along the Westerly line of said driveway to a point of intErsECtion with the WESt line of the East 210 feet of the said West half at a point 71 feet, more or less, North of the South line of said Tract 122; thence North along the West line of said East 210 feet to a point 320 feet North of the South line of said Tract 122; thence West along the North line of the South 320 feet of said Tract 122 to the West line of said Tract 122; thence North along said West line to the Northwest corner of said Tract 122; thence East along the North line of said Tract 122 to the point of beginning. PARCEL 2: The South 320 feet of the West half of Tract 122, Vera, according to plat recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, Page 30, in Spokane County, Washinyton, Except the East 210 feet thereof; Also that part of said West half of said Tract 122 of Vera, described as follows: *CONTINUED* Ajfilrated mth Frrst Amencan Trtle Insurance Company . . Page 2 No. 20478 Beginning at a point in the South line of said Tract 122, 210 feet West of the Southeast corner of the West half of said Tract 122; thence East along said South line 17 feet, more or less, to a point of intersection with the Westerly line of asphalt driveway as the same is now located; thence Northerly along the westcrly line of said driveway to a point of inter- section with the West line of the East 210 feet at a point 71 feet, more or less, North of the point of beginning of the West half of said Tract 122; thence South along said West line _ to the point of beginning. " This company certifies that record title is vested in JERALD M. BELCIiER AND CAROL A. BELCHER, husband and wife, as tc Parcel l; GARY E. ALMSTROM as his sole and separate property, as to Parcel 2, free from all liens, encumbrances and ob3ections, except as follows: 1. GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1979 Amount: $879.50 Tax Account No.: 15544-1207 GENERAL TAXES: Year: 1979 1lmount: $798.41 Tax Account No.: 15544-1205 2. IRRIGATION ASSESSMENT: For: 1979 Amount: $38.00 By: VEra Irrigation District #15 Affects: ParcEl #2 NOTE: There will be a$3.00 charge by the County Treasurer if the above assessment becomes delinquent. 3. Provisions contained in Contract between Vera Electric Water Company, D.K. McDonald, et al, and Vera Land Company, dated April 25, 1908, recorded in Book "H" of Contracts, Page 292. 4. DEED OI' TRUST : Grantor: Gary E. Almstrom, and Ca.ro]_ L. Almstrom, husband and wife Trustee: First American Title Insurance Company Beneficiary: Great Western Union Federal Savings & Loan Association Original Amount: $27,900.00 Dated: September 4, 1975 Recorded: September S, 1975 Auditor's F'ilc No.: 7509050257 Affects: Parcel 2 *CONTINUED* Page 3 No. 20478 5. MOHTGAGE: Mortgagor: Gary E. Almstrom, an individual Mortgagee: Washington Trust Bank, a corporation Original Amount: $2,000.00 Dated: November 23, 1977 Recorded: December 6, 1977 Auditor's File No.: 7712060040 Affects: Parcel 2 6. A lien in the amount of $2,050.00 payable $75.00 per month, in favor of Carol L. Almstrom, against Gary E. Almstrom, as disclosed in the Decree of Dissolution of Marriage, Case No. 232755, Gary E. Almstrom petitioner, and Carol L. Almstrom, respondent, entered therein on February 4, 1977. NOTES: 1. Irrigation AssESSment of $38.00 by VEra Irrigation District #15 for 1•979, is Paid in Full. Affects: 15544-1207 Said premises lie within tlie boundaries of Vera Irrigation District #15 and are subject to future assessments by said District. This company further certifies that all taxes and assessments levied and chargeable have been fully paid except as noted above. , FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~ Title Off icer Fred Trochimowicz ~ FT/sb R ECEI vE . APR 2 J 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARtMENT FILE # 1:1g%~~~~ ~ 70f • ~ /Z ~ ~ 78 8XIOC31.''~ ~tD= • THRESHOLD DETERMINATION e0-, DECLARATION OF proposed,final) /V41v Sl~ J~Jl,~'I~/~ /V Gl~+ (significance/nonsfignificance) 1. Oescription of Proposal: 602b 1OS /0AJ QF A. jA) 2 l t SaMA.b.`' 14 , -r- r8en, 2. Proponent: 3. Contact Person: #-A Phone:?61V---?7 7* 4. County Action (s) Requested: J/ Znne Change; _Jooo- Preliminary Plat Approvat: Final Plat Apnroval; Change of Condition Other: ~ 5. Lacation of 3roposai:A6 S ~ ~ 41= V"&)f ~A eyAmckiR/6'•&24-•yILj/ 5. Lead Agency : SPOKANE COUNTY.WASH INf,70N This roposal tias been determined tolL~have a sianlficant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43.21C.030 `z) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a com- p ete 7environmental checklist and other information oA file with the lead agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name~FVM A • Name HARRY jmfj Am"M , b Signature ~ Signature Cr. Title R~" Tftle Oepartment ~W~I~ v Qepartme t eQ . . Da te Oa te , 0~7AK 8. Far Declarations of Signiflcance Only: Date of Expected Oraft EIS Avallability (determined bv Responsible Official) Oate of [ssuance . TO 8E COMPIETED 8Y RESPONSIBIE 4FF?CIAL: a. Brief description and listing of those environmental impacts leadfng *o such decZaration: 0. Brief explanation of what measures. if any, couid be taken by tne applicant ta prevent or initigdte ths emvironmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that Lhe responsible ofticial could constder a revi3ed proposal with a possible resulting declaraLion of nonsignificance: ~ . L..w~ .;~s..I~►;:. ra1::. . , . . r~ IVO. BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON. IN THE P9ATTER OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE SPOK14NE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE COPRMISSION S HEARING OF SEPTEMBER 29, 1978. WNEREAS, the 8oard of County Comnissioners of Spokane County, Pursuant to the provisions of the revised Cade of Washington, Section-36.70.620, shal] upon receipt of any recom- mended officiai control or-amendment thereto, at its next regular public meeting set the date for a public meeting where it may, by ordinance, adopt or reject the official con- trol or amendment; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Comnissioners of'Spokane County, did by Resolution No. 78 1333 acknowledge receipt of the reconanendations from the Spokane County Planning Cornmission concerning its hearing of September 29, 1978; and WNEREAS, the Board of County Corr~nissioners of Spokane County, did by said resolution set the 16th day of October to consider the recomrnendations of the Planning Commission concerning its September 29, 1978 hearing, a copy of said recomendations are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVEO by the Board of County,Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington,that based upon the information available to the Board and the testimony at that meeting, the followi,ng action was taken: l. PS-975A-75 - SOUTH RI'DGE VIEW 6TH ADDITION - HERN ZS- 45A-75 - AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEtaTIAL The 6oard concurred with the P1anning Commission's recommendation to a'pprove the Extension of Time to September 1, 1979, with the new standards for curbing and paving. 2. PE-1134-77 - SYNGING HILLS - WOODARD ZE- 145-77 - UfVCLASSIFIEO to AGRICUL~TURAL SUBURBAN Naving received a comunication in disagreement with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the Extension of Time to October 1, 1979, the 8oard set a date of _P¢e&v&4j U ~ at~,'30 of said day to further consid'er the matter. 3. PE-1161A-78 - SUNSET MEADOWS - SWANSON ZE- 121 -78 - AGRICULTURAL to SIiVGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a co,nnunication in disagreement with the Planning Commission's recommendat-ion to approve the preliminary plat request, the Board set a date of ewn6" at 34a.r, of said day to further consider the ma`fter. - 4, PE-1222-78 - BAYES ADDITION TO VERADALE - BYERS ZE- 122-78 - AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a corrmuni'cation in disagreement with the Planning Commission's recommendation for deniai of ttie preiiminary pla,t request, the Board set a date of eQmiN,. at _,5Lpo p.m_ of said day to further consider the matter. 5. PE-1223-78 - CORRIGAN ADDIT_ION - GUTHRIE INVESTMENT C0. ZE- 124-78 - AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAmILY RESIDENT'IAL The Board concurred with the Planning Conunission's recommendation to deny the request for this preliminary plat appiication, for the reas'ons as stated in the minutes of the Planning Coninission hearing. -1- . ~ ~ .+A~~b~~h►udl~~+~.s ..i..1• . .w - 1 r d • . . ' • • ~ b. SP-78-047 - SHORT PLAT - BEUAN The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recoirmiendation to appro.ve the Short Plat subject to the conditions recorrmended by the sho,rt plat administrator. 7.. PE-1224-78 - ORCHARD GARDENS lst ADDITION - NURTNWEST DEVELOPERS ZE- 125-78 - AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAmILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. , The Board al so cancurred wi th the P1 anni ng Comni ss i on' s recarrmendati on to zone the property to the Single Family Residential zone classification upon the filing of the final plat. The Board toak no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. 8. PE-1225-78 - BELCHER'S ADDITION - BELCHER ZE- 126-78 -AGRICULTURAL to SINGLETMITY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planni'ng Conenission's hearing.with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to zone the property to the Single Famiiy Residentiai zone classification upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. 9. PE-1226-78 - MARCO'S ADDITION - FOGG (no zone change requested) The Board concurred wi th the Planning Commission's recorrmendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. 10. PE-1228-78 - DIRE ADDITION - W.R.S. ASSOCIATES ZE- 128-78 - AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN'to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEiVTIAL The 8oard concurred with the Planning Commission's recomendation to approve_the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearing, with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Pia`nning Commission's recormnendation that the property should remain Agricultur_al Subur_ban upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final p1at. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the Board hereby authori2es its Chairman to sign Final Declarations of Non-Significance for each item approved above, subject to compliance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15.349. BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS A DAY OF , 1978, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE C4UNTY, WASHINGTON NARRY M. LARIVED, CNM. RAv W. CHNSMOSiii JERRY C. KOPET ....r. ATTEST : VERNON W. OHLAND Clerk of the Board By : r SPOKANE COUNTY PLaNNING COMMI'SSION North 7,21 -Jefferson Spokane, Washington 49260 . . October 4, 1978 Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House Spo,kane, wa. 99260' . Gentlemen: At the regul ar hea'ri ng, of the Spokane County P1 anni ng ',Commi ss i°on on Fri day, September 29, 19.789 4t 8:30 A.M. to 12:05 Noon, at which time the Commission held a luncheon meeting, reconvening at 1:30 P.M. to 6:15 P.P1., the enclosed acti,on was taken and,is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Planning, Commissi,on members present: Mr. Ted McCoury, Chairman., F9rs. abby Byrne, Mrs. Jane Myers, and Messr-s. Cul l er, Kennedy, Qui gl ey and Thomas. Planning Staff present: Wallis D. Hubbard, P1at,Admi,nistrator; Pat Frankovic, Assistant Plat Administrator; Blanchard and Johnson, recording secretaries. Engineer's office, Kennaly. Hea1th District: Prather. Prosecutor's office: Geo'r.ge. Si'ncerel 'y', , SPOKANE COUNTY PI.ANNING DEPARTMENT Qo Ted McCoury, Chai'rman ~ Fr,ed L. Dayhars Di rector of P1 anni ng TMC:myb Official minutes and record of action, taken~by -the Spokane County Planning Commissfon at their regular hearing held on September 29, 1978. ~ MINUTCS OF TNE SPOICANE COUNT`f PLANhliMG COMMiS5I0N HEARING dF SEPTEMBER 29, 1978 ~ WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did ho7d a public rneeting on September 29, 1978, to consider the testimony and requests of several applicants, objECtors.and other i nter¢stQd parti es concerni nq the fol 1 owi ng refer2nced subcli vi si ons, ZonE reclassification upgradings, extensions af time, a shoi^t plat appea1, and other items of business; and 4lNEREAS, at said heariny opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing all items of business; and WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Chai rman;, Mrs , Byrne, Mrs. Myers, and Messrs. Cul l er, Kennedy, Quigiey and Tnomas were in aittendance for the pntire proceedings, the only exception being that Mr. Kennedy jointed - 4Lhe meeting just a tew minutes aftar ihe call to order; bu-t with a quorum presznt at all times; and WHEREAS', the Spokane Cvunty Planning Commission fully considered the iesti- mony given, the environmental review, and all other evidenc2 presented, recommends to the 8oard of County Commissivners tfne following: A. aUSINESS ITEMS: i} Plannino Conimission Concerns MOTION by Mrs. Byrne that the Planning Commission designate the Planning Subdivision Hearing Examiner Cornmittees as the authority to hear any short plat appeals in the future. Mr. Thomas seconded the mozion. Vote was unanimous in favor. (Mr. Kennecly joined the hearing at this point.) Mr. McCaury pointed out 'Lo the Commission members that the Commisslon approves landscape plans, but they have not included any dates by which landscaping should be completed. 2) Other Business REPORT by Doug Adams of Long Runge Pianning with reaard ta the Citizen Participation Corrunittee. Copies of the "Qperation Insight" were mailed out. Sixto-en community club meetings were helci in September, with a full agenda planned in October also. They also held a meeting wi-ch Mi 11 wood , and ini ti ated neeti ng wi th Rockzord and Ai rway Hei ghts i n the "small town" cooperative erTOrts. Mr. Adams also reported that the "Slcetch Plan" zs t,yell under way and should have results in late Octaber or early November. Mr. QUigley offered tlle suggestion that- ihe Citizpn Participation Com- mittee should meez with Mrs. qegal in the planning o-r' the area south of 6roadway, and p1an orderly development of that area. P~r. Darrol l A. ~lai 1 er, Superi ntendent oL Eas~~ ~/al 1 ey School Di strict .=361 spoke beTare the Commission wizh regard to overcrowded conditions in that school di stri c 'L. He po i nted out const•ructi on now under way woul dhandle only studen'Ls who are currently hous2d in temporary quarters, and that a recent school bond issue had been defeated. NE asked 'Lhe Cornm'lssion to give their consideration 41.-o these problems, and the Commission expresszd desire JCo cooperate in every way possib1E, as did the Planning Department. -1- cont'd. 4 ~ PLANNING COMMISSION NEARING MINUTES ' September 29, 1978 The Chairman closed the business discussion and announced the remainder or the hearing would address itself to Preliminary Subdivision applications and zone recl assi fi cati ons , al ong wi th a short p1 ai subdi vi si on appeal, whi ch woul d be presented by members of the Planning Department staff, and te-stimony from each plat sponsor andJor his repres2ntative; follot~~ed by favorable and/or opposing testin~ony from the audi9nce, with rebuttal allowed the sponsor. Chairman McCoury announced the Agenda items in order. B. PRELIMI NARY SUBD TV I S IONS - EXTENS IONS OF i IME 1. PS-975A-75, SOUTH P.IDGE VIEW 6TH ADDITION, Tor an EXTENSION OF TIME by Nern, and ZS- 45A-75, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAiti to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the Extension of Tim2 be granted to 5eptember l, 1979, wn th the new standards for curbing and paving. Ii was poinred out ~o the Commiss7on hy the sponsor's representative that the plat is within one week of sinaliza-tion, as is South Ridge View 5th Addiiion on which the Commission h2d granted an ext-ension of time 3ust one month earlier without the new standards rQquirement= and that the sponsor wi 11 defi ni tely pave and curb the pi at, but pref2rred to wai t unti1 after building construction had fleen done. However, members of the Commission held that a new policy would require new standards on extensions of time. 8ecause i t was rel t thi swas a uni que si iuati on at Soutli Ri dge View 6th Addition, an earlier motion was made by Cu11er that the Cxtension be granted without the requirement of pauing, seconded by Quigley. The uote was ~our "no's" and two "Yes." (Date of 9/1/79 is correct--ofTice error had overl oolced ihi s i tem ~ or the August agenda ) (Moti on to approve wi th new standards 5y i homas , seconded by Myers. Vote was f i ve i n fa>>or,- and one opposed. Mrs. Byrne had flxcused liersel f from hearing this requesi because she resides in the immediatn area.) 2. PF-1134-77, SINGTNG HILLS, for an EXTENSTON QF i IME by Woodard, and ZE- 145-77. UNCLASSTFiED to AGRICULiURAL SUBURBAN: That the Extensioli or Time be granted to October 1, 1979 with the stipulation that bresent day road s 'Landards be appi i cabl e. (Motion f.o approve by Kennedy, seconded by Thomas. Motion carried unanimousl y. ) C. PRELIMINAR`r SUBDIVISIOPJS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICAi IONS 3. PE-11oiA-78, SUNSET MEADOWS by Swanson, and ZE- 121 -78, AGRIGUL i U'RAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEiN! i iAL : Thaz the prel inlinary piat be APPP.OVED, and 7n so approving adopts the Staff's Findings dated September 29, 1978 and the Enaineering conditions wliich were read into 'Lhe record at the hearing, as the Pi3nning Commission's Findings of Faet, with a requirement 'Chat the plat dedication shall give information that animals are allowed on adjoining propEriy outside the plat. (Motion to approve by Byrne, seconded by Thomas. Motion carried unanimous1y.) -2- eont'd. PLANNING COMMISSION HEARINL. ~ MINUTES Septem6er 29, 1-977 C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 4. PE-1222-78, BAYES ADDITION TO VERADALE by Byers, and ZE- 122-78, AGRICULTURAL to SIiVGLE FAMII.Y RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be DEyIED. The Staff recomme.nded a significant environmental impact declaration due to the high nitrate concentrations in the area. The recommendation included an Environmental Impact Statement which would address in particular the groundwater impacts and human health of the piat with the proposed density. There was a motion by Byrne to limit the testimony to whether or not the plat needs an E.I.S.; if it should+not, the Commission wouid hear the rest of the plat. Seconded by Quigley. The motion was lost with four "no" votes, and three "yes." It was pointed out by legal counsel that even though the Planning Department based its recommendation on the groundwater quality in the area, all the issues would still have to be addressed. The Commission decided to hear all testimony concerning the plat. The sponsor's representative presented water quality statistics and quoted remarks by Ray Card that this proposal in and of itself would not affect the groundwater quality significantly. The Health District representative questioned the how and when of the samples taken, and pointed out that there are a number of the small plats that "in and of themselves" on an individual basis would not affect the groundwater significantly; but collectively, all those sma]1 plats amount to a rather large area. There was considerable testimony and presentation of slides, statistics, a petition, and other material by opposition, with regard to density, agricultural pursuits in the area, incompatibility, and overcrowded schools. Motion to approve by Thomas (reserving the right to speak to his motion if it is seconded), with the conditions specified by Staff; but determination made that an E.I.S. would not be useful. Seconded by Kennedy. The motion was addressed by the Commission, giving consideration to a decision by the Board of County Commissioners in a Findings and Order of December 16, 1976 (No. 76 1229) wherein the 6oard had made a determination regarding size of tracts in this area; and the Commission felt they should uphold that decision. The density of the plat was held to be incompatible in the area. (Motion to approve was denied unanimously because of incompatibility.) (NOTE) During testimony of the above, the Commission recessed for lunch. The entire proceedings are set forth above for purposes of continuity.) 12:05 Noon - Luncheon Meeting_ Topics of discussion included: The aquifer Court decision regarding short plats 1:30 P.M. - Hearing reconvened C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS aND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 4. (PE-1222-78 BAYES ADDITION TO VERADALE - continued in hearing as noted above.) -3- cont'd. _ , . PLANNING CQMMISSION HEAR1,,6 MINUTES September 29, 1978 C. SHORT PLAT SU8DIVISION APPEAL (advertised as first item on afternoon agenda) 6. S_P_-18-047 ,SHORT PLAT proposal by Al bert J.E1 lgrn, an appeal b,y Magnuson and Smith. That the short pTat propasai be APPROVED, with the conditions . recomrnended b,y the shart plat admi nrt strator. Testi many by fri endly neighbors who stated t~ey weren't really appased to the subdivision, irtdi- cated the3 rreal concernwas a shortage of water i nthe area.ComnissTon r~embers 1~e1 dthat wo~a ld~e alegal matter, (Moti on to apprQve by Quigleya seconded by Byrne. Voti~ was six i n favar of approval, and ane "no"r vote. ) C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVI~~ONS AN~ ~ONE RECLASSTFICATIONS 1 5. PE-1 223-75, CORRIGAN ADDITION by Guthrie investment Co., and zE- 124-78, AGRIcuLTURAL to SIr~~~~ FAMrLY RESLDENTIAL: That the preliminary ~t reqttest be DEiVIED. There was -testimony in favor of th2 plat, -i n 3dd-i- tion to that frvm the plat sponsar and his representative, to the effect that hi gher densi ty i sneeded in thi sarea t❑ accammadate the worlcing man w#~o can' t afford acreage. Oppas iti on presented apetiti an wi th 20$ si gna- tures oppased to the plat. Also presented was a letter from the P.T.A. expressing a concern for flvercrowded school s. Testimany i nda cated chi 3 drerr ir+ the area are bei ng bussed to other school soutsi de thei r area. Der+sity was a concer°n ❑f the Commissian. {Moti on tn aparove by Byrrre (with the understandi ng she waul d vate against hET' Tf1Q~~on), secon~~d b]/ Qu1 ey. Vote Wd~ one "yeS" to dppl"OVe, and S1 3{ ,inQ'i Vot2S. 7. PE-1224-73, aRCHARa GARaENS Ist AaDrTIo~ ~y No,~thwest Developers, and zE- 125-18, AGRIcULiuRAL to SINGLE FAMTLY RESIDENTIAL: rhat the preliminar,y plat request be A~~~OVED, and in so approvirtg, advpts the Staff' s Fi ndi ngs dated September 29, 1975 and the Engineeri ng condi ti ons which were read f nto the record at the hearing, as the Planni ng Commission' sFi ndings af Fact. (MotiQn to approve by Thomas, seconded by Quigley. Vote wds five to approve, two were opposed.) 8. PE-1225-78, BELcHER'S ADaI i ION b,y Belcher, and ZE- 126-78, AGRICULTIJRAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIaENTIAL: That the prellminary plat request be APPROVED, and in so approvi ngs adaptsthe 5taff " s Fi ndi ngs dated September ~9, 1978 and the Engineering conditz ans whi ch were read into the reeQrd at the heari ng , as the Plann ing Cammission ` s Fi nding s of Fact, wi th the fo11 owing condi tions added : 1) That no 1ots i n the redesign af the p 1 at s ha 1 Z be sma ller tha n 10,900 sq,ft. 2} That the plat shall pravi de a 25' ri ght of way gi ving access ta the NE1y property bordering the plat. 3) Extend Mamer Road to the north end of the property. (Candi tions of County Road Erigr. el iminated cu1 de sac # and extended Mamer RQad, which then requi res redesign and ad,j ustrnent of exi sti ng and propased lot sizes.) { Motion ta apprave by Byrne, secvnded h,y Qui g 1 ey . Vote six "yes, " one "no. " } -4- cont ° d . , . . ~ PLaR!NING COMMISSION HEARING MINUTES September 29, 1978 C. PRELIMINARY SU6DIUISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 9. PE-1226-78, MARCO'S ADDITION by Fogg. (Zoning is AGRICULTURAL, no change requested.) That the preliminary plat request be APPROVED, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings dated September 29, 1978, and the Engineering conditions which were read into the record at the hearing, as the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact, with the following conditions added: 1) That large animals, except for household pets, shall be pro- hibited through covenants of the sponsor. 2) That two lots to the west will be reduced to 100 frontage, as minor lot line adjustments witnin the plat. (Motion to approve by Kennedy, seconded by Myers. Vote was six in favor of the motion. Byrne abstained.) 10. PE-1228-78, DIRE ADDITION by W.R.S. Associates, and ZE- 128-78, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be APPROVED, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings dated September 29, 1978, and the Engineering conditions which were read into the record at the hearing, as the Planning Commis- sion's Findings of Fact, with the following conditions added: 1) That the ZONING WILL REt•1AIN AGRICULTURAL SUBUR6AN 2) That no duplexes will be allowed. (Motion to approve by Kennedy, seconded by Myers. Vote in favor of the motion was unanimous.) 6:15 P.M. - MEETING ADJOURNED. DATED THIS 4TH DaY OF OCTOBER, 1978. By: Myrth Blanchard, Flat Secretary For: Ted McCoury,Cnairman Planning Commission Fred L. Oayharsh Planning Director -5- f ZONE RECLASSIFICATION OR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION U ACTION TAKEN ~PR&E~ DENY CONTINUE L1EIVGTH OF CONTINUAlVCE , REASO NS 1. 2. 3. 4. CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning Staff' s Finding s, Dated cI ,~9 , and subject to the additional conditions that . /670 o 2. 3. ~ VOTE Motion by , Seconded by VOTE YES (O NO ~ - ' 01FFY" OF COUNTY ENGIN. M ' SFQILAME COUNTIP', WA$H1NGTON Da#a Intes-o#fice Communication ~o PLANNING COMMS S I DN GARY KEMNALY, PLAIVNING & TRAFFIC pIYIS ,ML ION ENGINE$R sMb#K * Fog~ *COi~~ITIONS CiRC1..+E~ ~PLY TO i L1'Ll V;YDEF{ CO111SIDERATIWlq that conditional appraval of the p1at #.s given subjact to dedic~~ion ~f Rig~~ ~f Way to the pubIic aad aPProval of the road syscem i.n the p].at by the County Ea,glLaow; • , ~that p1an3, prof#.lsss and cross sactivns s~owing proposed street contertiqo and curb vades be subraicted ta tha County Enginee~ for apprarral prior to cvzLattamct.i~~ an4 the filiag af a final plat; • . that drainage plareu and design calculaeians showing the grades aad alig=aut of drafa- age facilities be subnitLed to the Cauaty Engir~eear for approval privr Co aaarst~;uaCion and ttxe filing af afinal plat; . &construction w#.ehin the propcased pubiic straets snd ea3ennnts ~hal1 be perfcarm~d undar tha direct supervision vf a 1icensed laad surveyvr, who sha1l be rea~~nsLI41a for perpetuating al1 evidence r,f ths locatiqn of survey m+anrmants vhJL+~h pay be disturbad duri.ng coastrucr-ion and ;rho shalI furnish the Couut~ tag3.~~r vit}t ~uile" plarxs and acertiffca~e In uriting that all improvemeats were LuslWLIod to the lines and grades shQwn on the agproved constructior~ plans ao,d t~~ *11 di~turbed monurnerzts have been replaced; Ono construction work is to be p~~~ormed s,r~~hin the Publ.ic R.f.ght of Way uiar-LI a permiC h~~ ~~en issuad by the County Engineer. All wark i~ subjeat to insp~~tion and ap~roval by the County En3ineer; ~all con~~ruccion within the Public Right of Way ia to be ~omgleted prior tv f~34nz the final plat or a bond in th-_ amnunt esLimaeed byr the Cu►unty ZqXinx*r t.o caver the cosC +of couatruceion of improvements, cor~~truct#.oa cert~ficaCian,, "As buil~~ ~~auS. ar~d manLon~~ting the streac centerlines shall be filed with thia Cot~~y Eugi,~er. (Dno dfrect access frorn lnts La 1/2 right of ways until such time as additiQn~~ righL of waya are dedicated and roads are estahlished as County Roade. , ~8-no direct access from lots to 5tu6 RQed cannecLi.ons unti1 such roads are corxstrueCed t❑ CvunCy Standards end estabYished as County Haeds. ~ y 9 road design, NOW constructiort, and drainage contral for L/Z righea of weys and Stub Rwad connecti.uns are the responsibility 4f the Devs1aQer4 } l0y Ch~~ the SpansQr shall prepare end submit tv the County Engineer a design proposel accepe; a61e t❑ the StaCe Higtiway Department of the propased State Highway-County Rowd igter- section, Stote Mighway Ilepa,rLcnent epprovsl of the prroposed design musc be receiv$d pricar ta che filing of the ffnel plat. Impravements to the State Uighway ar+e to be rhe reepon- sibility uf che Sponsur and inay eitfYer he canstructed or a band to cover the cosG of such improvernenra furnished tv the County tingineer in the amount as detemi.ned by Che County Lngineer and the Scate High~ay Depart-tnent. ~ 1,~ ~,~~at~ all r~oads wi~.hin ~.he Plat be cu~r-bed a~c~=paved to the specif~catic~r~s of the County ~~gi-near. Ecisting County roacis lyrovidi.rig direct access to 1otu c~f the pls.t shal~ be I~ i ~ ptived andAweurbed to #,iie :~.tandar€ls Gf the County Engineer. „-12-no direct accesa fram 1ots tca ~13 dedication of r~ddit.iu:~€~l f4ig~7t of Way slong that the aLner, his grantees and ~~signs eg3ee ~o participate in and nat oppose or orotest an RIg an ~k~r_,AJ M,4a4c- e- • ,elG~ o ~ ~ DL ~ v x ~ . STAFF FINDINGS - September 29, 1978 PE-1225-78 - BELCHER'S ADDITION ZE- 126-78 - AGRICULTURAL to R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 1. GENERAL INFORMATION A. Location -The proposed plat is situated in the Spokane Valley, north of and adjacent to Valley Way and approximately 300 feet west of the intersection of yalley Way and Evergreen Road. B. Proposal -4.8 acres subdivided into 15 lots for single family use. -Typical lot frontage = 80' -Typical lot siZe = 10,900 sq. ft. -Lots per gross acre = 3.1 lots per gross acre. C. Relationship to Comprehensive Plan -The map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates that the site, as well as adjoin- ing properties, suited for residential usage. The map doesn't make any density designations for residential uses. D. Existing Land Uses -The proposed site currently contains three residences and the back half of the parcels has been used in the past for pasture, -Surrounding the property, we find residential uses. Parcels to the north, west and east (across Evergreen Road) range in size from one to five acres. To the south of the property, across Valley Way, are several subdivisions (such as Loita's Subdivision, Donalee Addition and Birkettts Subdivision) vlith an average lot size of approximately 11,000 sq, ft, On the east side ef the proposal, on the northwest corner of Evergreen Road and Valley Way are five duplexes on 13,000 sq. ft. lots. Across Evergreen Road there are several highly developed residential areas. -Other existing land uses around the proposal include: the Vera Water and Power complex at the northeast corner of the project, a church on the east side of the site, and another church off the northwest corner of the prelimin- ary plat. E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses -8elcher's Addition is being proposed in a particular section of the rapidly developing Spokane Valley that has experienced very little development. Generally, the area immediately north of Ualley Way and west of Evergreen Road is still of a rural nature with few urban residential density developments. The area south of Valley Way and east of Evergreen Road has developed an urban residential character. - 8A - cont'd. V ~ •r STAFF FINDINGS - September 29, 1978 Belcher's Addition 1. GENERAL INFORMATIOPJ - cont'd. (Compatibility with Existinq Land Uses) -The development as proposed would be compatible with the areas to the south and east. But it is warth noting that the proposal is intruding into an area that has remained virtually untouched by urban development and retains a rural density. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION: A. Circulation (Engineering recommendations not received at time of printing.). B. Sewage Disposal -The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage disposal means, including on-site septic tank disposal, community septic tank disposal, and community package treatment plant disposal. For economic reasons, and to provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engineer feels on-site septic tanks should be utilized. -The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on- site sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The District states that an on-site sewage management system should be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 17 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer; and the Health District, in their examination of the possible impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments: Impact Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 15 lots on 4.8 acres with a typical lot size of 80 by 136 feet. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of sig- nificance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alterna- tives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: - 8B - cont'd , -w • i STAFF FINDINGS - September 29, 1978 Belcher's Addition II. SPECIAL IfVFORMATION (cont'd) (Impact Discussion) (1) In normal precipitation years, subsurface disposal of sewage treat- ment effluent does reach and recharge the groundvrater. (2) All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, tivhich are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/l. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background.- The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concen- tration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level. c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.81 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges to 1.96 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not rehcarge the groundwater have the follotiving gene-ral characteristics: (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evapora- tion for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are generally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields. C. Drainage -The County Utilities Engineer reports that the preliminary storm drainage plans submitted by the applicant indicate that on-site storrn drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved prior to the final plat filing by the County Utilities Engineer. D. Water Supply -The proposal is located within recorded service area of Vera Water and Power and the District advises the Staff that adequate system capacity, and a desire - gC - cont'd. ~ ~ ~ STAFF FINDINGS - September 29, 1978 Belcher's Addition II. SPECIAL INFORMATION - cont'd. on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and irrigation uses. E. Fire Protection -This proposal is situated within recorded service area of Fire District #l. -The fire district requests that mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection, as determined by the fire district staff, be required as a condition of final plat approval. F. Schools -The proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District #356. -The District, in response to staff inquiries concerning current status and future facility needs, indicates that their facilities are currently at capa- city levels. They further state that they "....would like for the Planning Commission and County Commissioners to watch the development activity in relationship to housing students, more closely. The district will have to have a new bond issue for construction very soon. If this doesn't happen, the Central Valley School District will not be able to house all of the students." G. Parks -The report "planning for Parks" (revised 1976) indicates that there are currently no parks located in this neighborhood, known as the Valley Way neighborhood. As the area develops, the report states that a 8.0 acre park is proposed, to be located near the Blake Elementary School on Broadway. H. Unique Environmental Features -The Spokane County inventory indicated none for this area. I. Cu'l tural Resources -No cultural resources have been identified in this area. II. ZONING ANALYSIS -The site is presently zoned Agricultural as is nearly all land adjoining the project. R-l, Single Family Residential zoning is found in Loita's Subdivision and Donalee Addition, to the south; and Agricultural Suburban zoning occurs on property to the east of Evergreen Road. The applicant has proposed R-1 zoning for Belcher's Addition. -If approved, the zoning would be compatible with the R-1 zoning occuring on the south side of Va]ley Way. However, the zone change would be encroaching into an Agricultural-zoned area. This could lead to some land use conflicts until such time as the area develops with additional residential zones. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW -An environmental checklist was submitted by the sponsor. It has been reviewed, and no significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. 8D cont'd. c w f 1 STAFF FINDINGS - September 29, 1978 Belcher's Addition IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW - cont'd. -Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air; water; noise; light and glare; land use; natural resources; population; housing; transportation/circulation; public service; energy and utilities. -The Planning Director has issued a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance, and it has been circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction. V. CONDITIONS If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats," August, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department. NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter. -P-l, P-2, P-35 P-42 P-51, P-61, P-7, P-8, P-9, (October l, 1979) P-13. _ E 6-5- a: r-z 4 T--rri C4 f r=- o c~.v P7 -A-1 -H-1 , H-5 -That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within {30} days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval-as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. -That a public water system, serviced by Vera 4Jater and Power, including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. -That an on-site sewage management be created and approved by the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of 17 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. -That the Planning Commission sustain the issuance of a proposed Oeclaration of Non- Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. -That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer. -That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to R-1, Single Family Residential. -That the project sponsor may not be notified by the Planning Department of the need to request an extension of time for the renewal of any preliminary plat approval granted by the Board of County Commissioners. - 8E - o~a~E CpGy~~ y r~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTN DISTRICT Inter-Offi ce Communi cation ~ N p~S Date: September e, 1978 T0: Spokane Coun_ty,PlAning Commission , . - FROM. Eugene C. R. S. , SUBJECT: Proposed Preliminary Plat - BELCHER'S ADDITION , References: a. Our memo to you, July 31, 1978, subject as above. , b. Revised plat map of subject revised September 5, 1978. Recommendations: a. Paragraph 3 of reference la is amended to read: "---has proposed 15 lots on 4.8 acres.---" b. Paragraph 4c of reference la is amended to read: "---a total of seventeen (17) dwelling units---." sel cc: Charles Simpson, Enqineer, North 909 Argonne, Spokane, Wa 99206 Marvin Belcher, East 13717 Valleyway, Spokane, Wa 99216 R E C E I V E SEf' 11 1976 SPOKANE CARTMENT PLANNING DEP SCHD-ADM-118 , ~ 4o~p~E CpGy'. . - SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Offi ce Communi cation . ~jH p\S Date: July 31, 1978 TO : Sp ne Count lanning Commission I FROM: e e.~p, .S. a Eugene C. rather, R.S. C. k) SUBJECT. . Proposed preliminary plat ` Belcher's Add. Vro~fl ~LA N N i tti ~ ~ s ~ , . y a~; T 1. Ref erence., . a. Map of sub3ect, scale t" = 50' by Charles Sirnpson; undated, received by this of f ice July 11, 1978. b. Ground-jJater Resoii,Xces alld Related Ge2lgg,y North-Central Sp,okaae gnd Southeastern Stevens Counties of WashinQton, Department of Water Re- sources, State of Washington, 1969. c. Ttne Effect of Anvlied Surface Waters on Groundwater Oualixv in the Snokane Vallev, D.K. Todd, Section 208, tJater Resources Study - Metro- politan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975. d. Soil Survev. Spokane Countv. WashinQton, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Suokane Countv. Washineton EnQineerine Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Logs of Vera Water District wells in Township 25, Range 44, Sections 15. g. Field Survey Report, Gene Sharp, Spokane County Health District, July 20, 1978. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973 and Spokane NE U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Topography, soils and water. a. This project lies in an area 160' f eet north of Valley Way extending east and west 322 f eet and 683 f eet north and south. Mamer Road lies north and south in the middle of this project ending in a cul-de-sac on the north end. There is a slight roll from north to south but should pnse no problema in reference to surface drainage. It is located over the Spokan-e Valley Aquifer. b. Surf ace soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5% slopes. They have a.septic tank f ilter field limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically the soils are glaciof luvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undiff erentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remmants have probably been revorked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. SCHD-ADM-118 . July 31, 1978 , Page 2 Belcher's Add. d. The data from a Vera Water~Districtf well in the area shows the well to have a total nitrogen level of 1.81. The Vera Water District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. ~ a. The plat sponsor has proposed 1~ lots on 1.-& acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its ineividual on-site sewage dis- posal system. This raises the question of signif icance of the impact , on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the condtact of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, And the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In sunmary, he concluded that: (t) In normal precipitation yeazs subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por- tion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phos- phates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" wi11 be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater f low line indicate that the tnaximum range of (dissolved sol- ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 rng/t. The forecastyyear 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."---"The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when com- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already asubstantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen.content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.81 ppm. A projected incre- mental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges to 1.96 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: ; July 31, 1978 Page 3 Belcher's Add. (1) Collector and central treatment systems disch3rging to surface waters would requfre at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically avAilable for this project. (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as la- goons, have saf ety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptahce. 4. Recommend that: a. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the eff ect that: "The public water system as approved by County anci State Health authorities and the local f ire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub- divider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as f ire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot." \ b. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authoacized the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system. c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this ~ off ide prior to the signing of the f inal plat if more than a total of dwelling units are authorized within the plat. ~,yerc~.ee~ d. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said water plan must have been approved by the f ire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier ~ (purveyor), and f ire protection district will certify, prior to the f iling of the final plat, on the f ace of said water plan that the plan is in con- formance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respecfive needs. Said water plan and certif ication will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction. cc: Charles Simpson, Engineer N. 909 Argonne cc: Marvin Belcher sm E. 13717 Valleyway i 5POKANE VFIRE DEPARTIAENT eo, 7. ,ga. 64/. / ~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHOtVf (509) 928-1700 September 18, 1978 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Mr. Dayharsh: The following preliminary 'v ~sions and zone classification for uP9radi n9 has been r i fbr f i re protection: ~ ~ , P E-1161 A- 78 S un s e t Me -d s~ ZE- 121 -78 Swanson- ~fains and hylr~nts need to be installed in thi s a~ a! > ~ P E-1222, t8 Bayes Add. ta on to Xgradal e ZE- 122-78 Byers7` i ins rants ,need to be i nstal 1 ed i n thi s i~reo. , . ~ . . PE-1223-78 Corrigan~ dd"t' ZE- 124-78 Guth-ie*,; ves Maips andi~hydrants need to be in$ta1.led~n L V- r<1 ' t PE-1224-78 y Or rd ;Gardet~s ZE- 125Y78~ ~ st D~' ~~aMains and hy~4r \s, need to be nc,~p ~ • . • - 4 ed i ! PE-1,~25-~18 --~el ~er . ZE-'1~6-78 Be_~che~- ainysp;.~ar~,~hy=d;rnts ne d tQ~'be ir, lled in this area. sta 9 ~ PE-1226-78 Marco'S,KAdd41i'on-(no', zone rhan;ge requested) ti Mains and hyd-rants n,ee, d:to befinstalled in tii's area. PE-1228-78 Dire Addition ZE- - 78 W.R.S. Associ ates- Ma~ips and hydrants need to~~ef~ ~s tal 1 ed i n i s area. . , ~ 1 Cook Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn PRE VENT FIRES SAvE LI VES _ . . ~ - , t CLARENCE E SIMPSON RICHARD L. SIMPSON CHARLES F. SIMPSON C,Iarence C~- simllion engineer.31 jnc. CIViI ENGINEERS AiVD LAND SURVEYORS ,3 Reg,.rrcred r►s Wa.rhrngton and Idabv TEIEPHONE 926_1322 OFFICE N 909 ARGONNE RD., SPOKANE, WASH. 99206 'Q.P O;tA N C0U,tf IY PLEIf~~~fl,EG DE~~`tiRTMCfff JULY 14, 1978 BELCHER'S ADDITION SPOKANE COUI+ITY HEALTH DISTRICT 3 ALTERNATIVES FOR SEWR4E TREAT++iENT 1. Individual septic tanks and drainfields 2. Mechanical Sewage Treatment Plant and Drainfield 3. Sewer Lagoon System 1. Septic Tanks - This method is the most comnaonly accepted practice in the Spokane Valley. In fact 1/3 of the homes in the United States are treated by this method. 2. Treatment Plant - This plat is too small in size to be economically feasible to install sewer lines, manholes, treatment plant and drainfield. A treatment plant needs approximately 100 homes to reach the break even point on the 0.&M. agreement costs with Spokane County. 3. Lagoon - This plat doesn't have the a,dditional land required for a lagoon. Also the oder which may occur would be objectional to this plat and the surrounding properties. S ince the County doesn't have a comprehensive sewer plan for this area alternate #2 is not feasible. The most feasible and economical method is with individual septic te.nks a.nd drainfields witYa a management system approved by your office. • S E. / C a E s ~ 9967 ~9967 Ju „a AGENDA, September 29, 1978 TELEPHONE N0. ~through 9/15) 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION beginning 9/18) 456-2205 Time: Friday, September 29, 1978 - 1:30 PM (Item #3 on afternoon agenda) Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor ,N. 721 Jefferson (and Broadway), Spokane PRELINIINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION Agenda PE-1225-78, BELCHER'S ADDITION Item ZE- 126-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL C. 8 a. Location: Section 15, Township 25N, Range 44, E.W,M. The West 1/2 of Tract 122 of Opportunity as recorded in Uolume "K" of plats, page 20, in Spokane County, Washington. Located in the S 112 of Section 15, T 25N, R 44 EWM. b. Sponsor: Marvin Belcher E. 13717 Valley Way Spokane, WA. 99216 c. Engineer: Charles E. Simpson N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 4.8 Acres e. Number of Lots: 15 Lots f. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural (established 3/27/42) h. Proposed Zoning: Single Family Residential (R-1) i. Water Source: Vera Water and Power j. School District: Central Valley #356 k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site systems l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. . ~ I^ I ~ ~ I ~ a _ I • ~ I !!~MI 8ION ♦V CA o • • ' M1 ~r MOit ' ; • ~ r.)0• ~ f i . . + i - ' ~AY ~V ~EL " ,:or,~, 1 M' II1 MILE ^ • i s' . a.o ' sc ~ ¢ v.►~ v wv a • . ~i~ i ? s1 . ~ • - ^ l r - J A J ~'l ~ ~ _ ii . • ~ ..E -^c - _ !•.y'-~ _ M~~a-.. av[ 67.. ` ` . = w ~ ~.,o • . • t _ t - Y• .~~.4t27 AGENDA, September 29, 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANN i NG COMMI SS ION C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS Page 8. PE-1225-78 BELCHER'S ADDITION I ZE- 126-78 AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BELCHER..........a 8 9. PE-1226-78 r1ARC0RS ADDITION - (no zone change requested) FOGG.........ooo...e.oo 9 10. PE-1228-78 DIRE ADDITION . ZE- 128-78 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL W.R.S. ASSOCIATES 10 . 5:00 P.M. ADJOURN s~~opG . z ~ ~ L.A~~ P~~.~. CA~~~ xaac~rsa Bi F~t~Nk o c. . ~ P~o~ z 2 ~ ~r CHARGE--~t~•:-~ Q-1 D~TS d-2 r J ~ ~ - _ . ~c co~E sEC.'T. a o, e~K.-~oT K ~ .~L 4 S ~ ~ io ,3 ~~_~,LZs-~~ CQ~~T _ _ - . G 9 L ~ S S O 3 ~ _ _ _ _ _ . ~ - q0 / Y ~ ~ ~ . 6 9 t 3 _ _ • , ~ 9 1 ' ~ - - - - - - - 69 1 _ qp3 " , ~ - _ ~ 1 ' 3 ~ ✓ ' ~ - s _ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ ~j~r~ , ~9 ti ' , Ke h on~ - - - - - - ~ _ _ - - - ~ ~ ~ ' ~ "`~3 ~ ~ Charge to: O10 _ _ _T~____ ~ ~ G~ 9 1 , - ~ ~ o ~ ~ col . 1 i~ a quote mark ( numeric "H" ) . - _ ~ - ' ~ ~ ~ cols. 2 - 4 ia coeatant "69Y T~" ~ ~ - - - ~ „ 6 9 1, L O I c ol~ . 5- I3 ie ~eria ui th blaaks_nc~sgtable ~ ' ~ Do not zero fiI 'L a ; ~ L ~ , ~ col. T~ i~ n quote n~rk (aum,eric '*Hf',). _ _~g ~ i -~lso ~ ~ - - - - .t 6 9 1 , ''~~=~o t`~ Identi fy and separate batches for- computer room. ~ ' -~,y~3'~- , F,.,~~ 1 i ~ _ ~ 6~ t This job must be complet~d no later than two (2) 2 , days after rece~pt. h~i ~ i D ~ o~ ~ p Forward data ~o the computer room for processing. ~ - I/ o s~~ Return these sheets to the P1 anni na Department upon comaletion of Keypunching; attention of: P~'I`at Secti o ~ ~,~91 ► -0,6~ ~ + ~ ~ v . , ~ ~ - ~ o . 9 ~ , ~ ~ -a~.,o_~- ' ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' .i . ~ :t.~Gl~ Codir~ e~c,aIDple~ ° i , ~ S ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ I - d ' ~ ~ $ _FL. T, R. 4. 6LK.itdT ` ~ ~ ~ 11 , ~ -0~ ~ ~ ✓ S 6~T ?~9 10 t3 , , b 9 1~ d~~~=_P - I 0 ~ ~ 2~ 5_ - J, 0 Z Farcel number 32541-~O1 on3~y 9 1~ I i l, S,L,7 T " ~ 2 i4~ 1-0,,~,,0, . Parcel aumbere 32541-ogao thru 325~-0~809 G 9 i t S► G/~ 4~ L-O ~ 8~ ~'arcei nu~er~ 325.~I-0800 thru 32541-Q89g ~ ~ , ~ a 1 - S, G ~ - NS 1/4 ot aec. 32 ~ t~. ?~5, rgs. 4~4 ~ f ~ A1T of aec. 32, txp. 25, rge. ~ -s G i ~ ~ 3. ► 5~4~ - / 8' ~4~ -~s 'AlI of txp. 25, rge. l.d,. . , ~S . ~ . . .T, ~ ' ' ~ ~ ~ 4t - ~ , , ~112 of rge . 4~ S~L.1. C` _ ~ i t ~ . .2 ♦ 6 i r 1' i 1 O i 3 l il r • e I,ZO f $i4l i-J, 0 L Parcel r:ueber $251.1-OS0l onS,y s 11 ~ -/,Z 0 ~2L.51411. -0Farcei numbere 3251.1-0800 thru 32541-0809 Voio' C 9 1! ~ L, O,~i 4-cParcel rnimbers 32541-0800 thru 32541-089g NE 1/4 0f aec. 32, twp• 25, rgs. 44 A1T of aec. 32, tvP. 25, rge. 44 . ~ A12 of txp. 25, rge. 44 - 11e, AlI of' rge. 44 ~ ~S► • ~ ~ ; Sectfona vithin _ ~ 6~ ~ ; '~Z►.~ ~ TownshivZR.anp,le I , 41i Q ob o 04103102 ol . ' L, , (Y7108104110,12 12 - 18 117 116115114 13 ; 1912012I!2212 24 10,291281 6 2 ; . , 31.32 5 )6 '6g L I -~sIi ' 6 9 /j, - / ~thia ~ctfona ► " 3~ ' Z~ . . " 3 ° ~ 1 - 1t3, p, !ei ~ ~ 3 4 , , . _~a9 t •i, ~ o_~. . , Irn , ' ► v MISSING FROM TAXPAYER/OIJNER COMPUTER LIST PE-1225 - BELCHERS ADDITION 14544-1527 - couldn't find name 1564 - Flel en Nl . Haden & Don E Haden N. 516 Evergreen Rd. ~ Spokane, WA 99216 1562 Frieda A. Thornburg E. 13907 Valley Way 99216 2617 Spokane Mortgage - J. E. McGarry 2618 H. A. Glander N 320 Evergreen Road 15544-1301 Couldn't find name i~~,rr~f- 1~^, T~,~~;~i~~~~~~1~ ~~:~~~.,~c-.r VER+A P~~1 ~122 ' ~HER~00~3 S R[~~~ERT~ ~~!~I2 E~ S324FT LY~ W~~ E~IDF'~C A1.~~ '~~t~ RTi~ DAFC A~"~ Pf ~P~ 1D iD170 S LN ~1Z1 ~1~FT MI QF S~ ~F S~ W11~ TH E A~~ S~~l t~Ft h!/L SH I~L~ T~} ~T i~ i~ L!W ~l'F E214FT 7~F~ ~Ifl~ 1V aF Pp'~ ~H t0 ~"~lB ~ ~~(C ER~FT f~F ~3?~FT ~F 4~1f? ~ 1 L5544~12Q~ ~SI~~Q~~~Sb~ ~ARY ~ A~,M~~R~'~ V~~A PTM ~91~~ GR~ S M~~ TERN €L ; . 5~2~~fi [lI~ W~l~ i]F ~i122 ~XC E~~!~FT~ A~L~O P TN ~►~lj~ ~~2~ D~4F< i~~Db 1(1 7~►~4 ~E AT ~T G Q~ ~ LIW 5~ 8L!( 2~0~~ I~ ~F 5~ ,.a~ DF S~ wtj~ T~ ~~a~.G ~ ~ L~1 1 T F T MI '!~i I~ Y 1 P L L ~ Y I~ ~I ~.N 0~ ~~1~FT 11F~ ~I/~ N~~F A~8 ~'H S T~D PC~B ~ - 155~~r-1~!~~ 54945~3~ R~I ~ItN ON R 41~RA ' T J ~PTN 9~ Z~ ~89~~' . C~l ~iT~ ~ ~ s~2o~~ a~ ~~r2 ` ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ r, ~ ~ - ~ . ' ~ : ~4~ ~'T ~ l} ~~~li V~RA IR~ ~I~ 15 V~~~► N[3~~~' ~F ~11~ ~ r~►x ~x~~~~ a a o~ ~~2~ f ~~5~t4-~~'}~ ~~~~~7~~ ~~T ~'i NRIS~ V~RA ~~/2 ~~(C ~t3~~T ~12~ fi H R N HR ST 't~/ IS ~UC C I ~~C~ ~XC 5340F'f ~~x ~4~46 5P~!(AI~~ ~fA 9~~ 4 21 L554~~1~15 ~~J0~~3L LS~ C?i ~ C~t~R1;1 V~~A NTS~ fl~ ~34~' ~7F ~i12 FIRSi' GH +~H CH~IS~ ~~I ~F ~LK ~Z~ ~ 4 9~ 1 19 R~ S ~~4 WA '49~ 14 - ~r - + _ I~ L'~54+~ 1~~ 5 7 4'~ ~~a~345~, I~~~f LAND~~~ C Y~~A~ 5265 EI1~' tl~ ~-'i~~LF AN[~ [ NC ~~x ~a~ ~x~ ~r~~~ ~ ~xc s~z~~ w~~a~ a~ ~~~o~ s ~trr~s ~POKAN~ ~fA 991~6 ~~544-~C14 7T~J!7~b~~A~ ~iI~~IA~M H 5~14~1~''~~' V~RA 51~~~ ~310' ~F 7 S , i~I~C ~IU Alf 8~( ~b ~LK 1Z~' ~~f~ ~,~~0~ ~~t~KAN~ C~UNTY ~LA~VN!}~G COM~l1 ~ ~~9~ ~ 4~~~1E(~ PR4~'~RTY ~WI~'~R5 N i~544-124~ T7~~~597~!1 ~ ~ ~~Y~H~tl. V►ERA 5~.Z3' ~F ~Z~fl' t~ ING M~1~ SAV Ob r ~ ~~.K 1~7. ~lL~ ~13t1# DAT~: ~ ~b~ZS 7 ~ # ~ ~ ~Y; < ~~54~-1~1~ 17~!]17~~#4 Jfl~N _ ~ BR~~N +V~RQ '~1~4 ~F ~8'~ ~II~G MU~" 5AY dl~ ~}6 , ~LIC ~~2 g 4~3~~5 1554~--~~1! 7~~~~,674~9 Jt~Hh~ C ~la(3R?iEA~ , ~~RA E1~~~ 0~ 517~' ~F ~iC ~4 T ~ ~I( I ~ S V (~b ~LK 1~~ ~i~G S85' 6~ 1~b~~ J ~ ; ~ ~ 15~4~-1~'1~ TTQ~i6~~r~B JflN~ ~ MO~I~HE14ll V~R~ Et~{} ~F 5~~5f [~F ~I~IC M SAV 81i ~b ~ r 9LK 1~~ S 1T~ ~ 1 , P ~554~-131! f~232T~~ H ~ ~'D~t '~~~~1 N1~~~'T ~f ~1I2 ~~GOX H~~~AR~ M ~ TR 123 ~X~ ~HE W80'~~ rH~RE[lF N 1 ~V~~[~~ ~EN it~ SPDI~~N~ MIA 9~~~b 1.~544-~~~~ i'7~O14r9'~~~1 ~~L~~RT G I~fIYT V~~~A W8~F~ (3f ~'HE N~~l~~~' M TG ~ r~~ ~~f~ r~ ~z~ 1~'S4~r-[3~~ ~~1~115~ R~~IAI~~ ~ PT ~F R . ~r~ . ~r~~ ~ ~s~+~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~r~ ; r~~ ~~~z ~~~aot~v ~o-~~~~,~ , ~ 1a544-13Q~ H~A~Y~ V~i~A ~I aF Bl~~ S~rAC ~F ~~HEAGY ELB~~~` H~ + ~11~ E~~ ~li34.8F~ N 2~3 EV~~G~E~N R~ s~a~~~~ t~~4~-[33'~ T~O~]~~6~~~ R~ S~VYD~R Y~RA Pfi~l ~F BI~~ DAF• BE~ ► hfC Ml! T AV BK 0+~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~+1 ~ Q~ ~►I~ ~~F 1I~ ~1~ ~ ~ - _ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~u~ ~Q~ ~H ~~i~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! T!G ~Q L~~T WiT'~ RAD f~F ~1~ ~'N CIA ~F 9~~?E~ A pI fi~ ~ S ~ 31.4Z ~ M ~ ~ I , rH rH s~~~~~ ~~s;~s ~i ~a r~ ~ r~ , i~~~4~134~ T~~~ib~G~~1T M~ ~7U~AI.L V!ER~ 5~14~.12' aF N147.~~' ; ~!C I~OUGA~~ GEQRGE ~ ~ ~F E7~1.34' ~F 4~1/~' ~12~ - I N GA~RY ~D , . ~"FIS (IRCHA~DS ~1A 99~~T ' ~ ~~5~4-~l~! 7~~13~1~~0~ J~~~N ~~~~~h~AN t~t}h~4 EE A~ ~ L ~ ~ B~ l~~G f(~ ~ ~ r; r~' . r~ _ . ~ ~ l~ P~ ~ r~~r ~r+~~ 41.~~' 7~~~?~~~~~~►~ ~1 ~1 MC DONA~LQ f~[1h~1~'LE~ ~4C~~ L~ ~3 , ~31 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~z ~tr_~,~ . k~,~~, 7 PET~R~~hd ~ i3DNAlEf A~?~ L~ '~3~ t~-PA~G ~,~T FE~I S~C. 15_44 ~rl~~ 7 D7I~3~ 2 J ~ ~~b3~~ 5 ~ANC ARES M~'C~ 1 5 4 4- 3~~ 1 ~ b 1~~ 8~}~~ D G~ 4 R Y L l~ A~ E Y 0 0~ A L E~ A~~ l L t ~ B 1 ~ ~ . , , ~ 178~ ~TB 1 ~ ~ ~.E_ ~ ~ . ; ~ ~ r ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~i ~rR~arNQ~~~ ~r~~ ~ 9 T~►(}t~ ~iLl J~YIWOl.~S D~N L~ ~55~i4 ~ t l ~1 # N 31 i ~IAMER RD ~ ~POKANE I~A 9'9,~ 1 b ~1 7 b 5~ FX STUdRT ' ~fl~IALE~ A~~ L3 ~-~~CpMf~ ~NTG i5~4#-~S'~~~ ~l~ ~ ~ L . ~~r99b . i ~ ~l ~ +~SMTG - F - ~R ~~INALEE Aaa !4 91 ~ANC ~i ~ 1~54~r 394~+ T8~(~~T9147 AL_~ U 'f ~ ~b'~►3 - ` p , , ?R MTG ~544- 4~ 77~71~429~ .~~FF W~iR~YC~S Y~RA PTH ~l/2 Q~ BAH~S ~5 _ l5 L 1 - B 24 [3A~~ ~~G AT NE C~R a~ ~1~4 T!i M14~bFT ~fH ~~~SF~ TH E~46FT TO 1~D5 (~9 - ~ , ~ : i ~~r ~ ~ ~ LN ~lF SD BLK TM N 0~1 E~LJV iQ Pa~ . ~ ° F a~ j ~ ~ R A~tTH ~ ~ ~~~4 77~+~ ~i ~9~ AR THUR F~I~pR~E ~.OI TA S SUB~T YI SIflH t1 B~ _,~Oa ~ I. 4 1 1 t ~r ~o~ ~ax~~w s~ ~ ~c~r~~ . ~a , = ~ ~ ~ ~ca ~ ~ +~t~~►~s su~azvast~N ~.z ~ ~~~~r~oo~, ~ aoe~~~rs ~~i~~~~~ ~ c~ ~r ~ ~ - r s. ~a ~i~~ ~~Id' i ~<<<~ti. a . u,<. ~ , 1' IF . , ~ ~ 15fi~4-4~~! 771~~1l~T3~~ C~4R~L~S - T~R ~DI~A S 5~18~IVISiON ~J, ~i ~ 13bOb VA~L~Y' IiAY SP~~(AN ~IA 9~~1b l ~ 1 544~ 7T 5 9 8~~~1 F~~fi~NUCH !aI ~A~ S SU~DIVI~ ~(~~V L~ ~1 SM~Rw RCIB~RT~ ~ 4~0?. (}~ll A 8 I. c~'~~<` z,' n 3 44 ~ 7 ,o. ~ P .7 ~ . ~ r~~ us~~v~s~~~r s~~~rrao~ ~ ~r~~~~~s ~5~44-4~~~ 774~I154r434 ~I~.t~A~ P A~~ L I S~ , .-L: ~ 1~ ~~bg~ ~ - : c~ ~ . ~ f M T I~ faliV ~ t~ 55~~-4 ~4 ~'~1a~1~6 3T;~ Jf~~~l SMITH L~IT~I S S~iB~JIYISi~N 1,~ ~1 ~ S~ ~ ~ Z N ~19 MA~'~HEI~ S~'~KANE ~A 99~16 - T ~i ~ ~ A ~ V~RA ~16f T~F F 1 l2 OF ~ RANSO~! 'VAI~G~i~l ~ l~~~r~r 14t~ 6~~~ ~ !T ~Saa~ ~ ' T~! ~~i E~C~ ~L~T~'ED PTI~ N 91~ ~1NES R[~ ~ 5~'~KAN~ YIA 99~~~b RY VEREi~ E 8~8 C~ H~N~~IV ~ YIER~ E~~S OF ~11~ 612~r ~ E 15 5+~~- I ~r01 ~ ~.1 ~ ~ ~ !~'~~4 VAL~EY iIAY {~R ~P~KAME i~A 992~b r~ i5 ~4- 7~► 4 ~7H PE~A I~ HA~I~~~l V~~A 5~~~~T ~1F ~1~~r~T ~lai~~ ~A~N~(~Cl~ I~IS . . ~ ~1 ~ ~ ~9f~ a L ~ r ~ - a ~ L 518a~2~~ ~r~ r-, ;,;,f ~1Zt ~ ~ <<~ , ~?._r~ L,~ ~ ~ ~ - ~i ~ ~ ntfi~~v~~r~ ~ v~aA ~r ~~zi R~rr~o~.~~ ~r ~ ~ ~ i..~~ ~~c~~ ~ t . ~ x ~~o~~ z~~r ~ ~~+~o~ v,~~~.~~~aav ~~~z~~~ SPOiiANE ~lA 9~Z~6~ , ~ ~L MTG . 155~►4-1105 ~~9T~~~ hl l~F~t ' L~S V~R~ ~1~,/~ '~F El/~ 81~1 ~ 1,~,55231~95 ~ r` 5+~4~~ ~ T ~ 'E t L. P4~K~R W~'~~ ~T 0~ ~1~~ ,~AARf~~R ~LE~~t E L l5. 1~Q_ 6~4~14~ ~'R 1, 5l ~ t~ SfCC~~ ~F V~11Z N2~~~~ ~[~~F ~~~~R ~'H N PAR TQ ~1L 1S~~t iN ~~3~~3 VAtCEY i~AY ~V45d~~G 5 T M IN I~b4.2~ T~M N 1~EG 16`~ ii~ E41 ~.1F T t~ NL 165. ~F ~ E(~~ 5~!~KAN~ ~IA 9'~Z 1+~ ' - - - ; , ~ , 7.~~~„~~ a~:~~~~~~~ w~~~n a~r~ ~ ~ ~a~~~rs ~ r~ a Fx ~r fl~~< ~~i~ ~~r ar~ g~ ~ ra s~~ ~t ~~c r~ a~ ~z~o ~ ~s c ~ ~ S LN ~1'F ~31z2 Z1~JfT W~p~ S~ ~~~R ~3F S~ ~i1i~ ~H ~ ALG S~~i ~?~T I~li. TH f~~LY TO PT I~ 1M LN ~F ~~I~~T 7~,F1' ~~L h) ~F P~~ T~i S T[~ PQ8 ~ N~tC~~ TH E TQ NECU~ OF ~I~/~ TIH S~`0 PD8 E~4~ ~19.5~~ ~173.4FT ~5544-(~fit~~ 9~~78i'~ ~I S~~At~ ~I~~G~ERi,T ~I~RA ~11~ ~Qf 4~T12 811b ~DAH~, ~ 4~, . FT 4 R Aa AY A ~ j ~ ti~:~ ~ E 7~C I~ ~ ~ 1~'~~2 8 Q ~ VE 1 ~ S~QitAME 'WA 99Z1b 15'~~►+4-~~~~ 7~1~1~~U1~~ N 4~ ~APT NM M~ V'ERA ETl2 Bllb ~EX+C ~lSfT PdG 1~~ Ff~ ~~L 5P0 ~ o l~ ~~2b91 7 ~4 R ~A 5 ~ ~ ~5544-~5U~ Ab3~5~~ ~ S~~G~~~E T~ WE 1~11 11~ !G~~ M G . ' ~XC ST t ~ 3~1 ~~7' B9 ~ . ~ ~ , 1,,7~-~ ~~o ;~r~y~~;. _ ~ ~ ~ - t~ ~ 4-~ 5 ~47~ ~ ~ ' E!RA ~ 2[lF E3 5~ a N[]N ~ f~ ~ a~ ~~c~x ~ ~~a~ ~r ~r ~ ~ o ~ ~~sr~ ~ ~t~~ ~~tc rr~~r ~ ~~~~b a~a~a~~a~r ~w~ . SP~IKdN~ ~IA ~9,~1~ 155~r+~-4~~~ 44~1t aT~ J R T~l~~L~ Y~RA P~ ~F ~115 E~/~ ~3F ~OMM MTC ~ ~ S X F ~ ~ ~ E3! ~F k~l~ ~E C N~4~ ~ ~042'~~28 - ~ ~ ~ , > r~`~ ? ~ s~ A ~ ~ ~.~~1~F~F"~~Q~ ~ii~~~i~~~ 'a ~ ~a ~ ~~~A ~ 1~ ,~'~i~a~~ ~"~~'i~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~R'~r~_~~ ~ ~ P~K~Mi~ ~A 99~ ~~r ti l5~~~,-~l~7~i lb~l~l~r~ P~TER I~~~"~~N01. V~RA F~RRE~~ BI1'~ L5 .,f°L~ PAGNUL P~TER A I~ b~9 iEWER~R'~~N RD ~ S~~~A~V~ 4~A 99~~1.6 t~~44=~~07 9~~535~1 'V~R~I ERR ~[~T 15 YERA FER~C~LS 8115 Lb ~~A% ~~E~~'~1 ~ ~ . : a , . : ~ , ~ - ' ~ 1 ~ ~ i 4 ~1.~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ,~y 1 ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ . ~i f il 4 ~ 1 , ] 4 ~ ~t..~~l~#1i ~~f Y~=i~1 ~f ~~~~~~~1 ~ p ~ - . M _ + .1 - + ' . ~ r 9 ~ _ ! i ~ _ ~ ~ _ 1 '~i~ ~ . t. 1 ~ ~ ~ e ~ r{ ` ' ) ~ ' f ~l ~ . , ~ ~ ' ~ 1 , , ~ , . . r ,j ~ ~1 ~ , . ~ { R ~ . , + i ~ b ~ , ~ . . . ~ ' } { -'.~~~~M ~1. . , 6_ ~i J ~ _ Y'. J~ f_,' I ~ _ ~ I I il{ 1 - 1 .A 1~ I `.3 1."". `i? il~ f~~',) k. q .r ' ~ ~ ` . . t ~ G : ~ t 1 i ~j , . ~ • ' ' ~l s '~r~ . ~~1 +r4 ~ f I' "l~~~~ 1 t~ ~ ' ~t~~~t~~+~ ~ - ~ ! ~ I " ~ S d ~ r ~ i' ~ " ~r'u~ ~ ~ ~ f , a' ~ . ~ . 1 ~ . 1 1 ( 1. ..T~!? s M' ~ t 1 6 , ' . : ' ' - ! ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ # , ~ ; 1 ' , ~,1 ~ ~ ~~1~ s _ ~ . ~ , . - : . - ~ . ~4 ' ~ ( i ~ . ~~Y ~ ~ . E u~ y ~ ~~~5~~ . ~ ' ~ 1~~I ~E I~ r. ~1 . ~ ~ . ~ . , . . ~ `1i~j~~' ~ . ' ~ ,~'i ! , . ~ ~1~ ~."`"~?i'~P`~ ~ , _ ' . ~ _ ; ~ _ I , , .o , , ` ~ , ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ PE-1225-78 & ZE-126-78 In the Matter of a Nearing to consider the application pf Marvin BelcherZ E, 13717 Valley Glay, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as BELCHER'S ADDITION, Also to consider changing the Zoning map from Agricultural to Single Fdmlly Resi- dential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat or plats of such property, The property being platted is described as: The West 1/2 Tract 122 of Opportunity as recorded in Volume "K" of plats, page 20, in Spokane County, Washington, Located in the S 1/2 of Section 15, Township 25N, Range 44 E.W,M. (North and West of the corner of Valley blay & Evergreen Roads in the Spokane Valley) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss covNrY oF sPOxANE ~ T, oj being first duly sworn an oath, deposes and says: That 1 am a ctttzen of the Untted States of Amerlca, and a resldent of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the U day of dp 6".Q• , I 9 2I persona 11 y posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of ' he hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ln a consplcuous manner at each of the foliowtng tocattons, to--wit; 20 &k~ 0 (20x,-, b0c-l 4 ~ i - DATED THIS n-) r) DAY OF 19 ~cc? . SIGNE ~ ~ . Subscrlbed and Sworn to before me khis cR0 -"~-kday of , 1 ~ , , Notary Pubttc in and for the State of Washington,. resid!•ng at Spokane, Washingto: ~ ~ ~ ~"ou a~r~ h~r~byr n~tifi~d, th~~ ~r~ ~t th~ h~ur ~f ~ _ o~ s~i~ ~~a in ~~~~~r~nce R~t~m A, ~Ilallc~n A~ver~u~ Er~- ~ tra~~el ~~arkar~~ ~c~unty C~urt House Ann~ex, S~ok~ar~~, "'~'~~hi~nc~t~n, T'h~ ~~+~KAf~1E ~C3Uf~T~f pLA►I~~VII~C C`~?MN~IS~ ~~~N will c~~d~r~t a~u~lic h~c~rin~ tt~ ~eneral ~~~~ri~~~~an ar~~: _ , ~~R FURTHE~ L~~`~A►I~~S ~ont~~t the ~p~c~l~~n~ ~~a~nty Pla~nir~g Dep~rt~nent~ ~u~lic I~Il~rks Bui~d~ng, ~1I. 811 J~ff~rsar~ ~~r~~et, S~~►kan~e~ 11~'~shin~tor~. Dir~ctvr ~f Pl~rrn~~rg Sp~ka~e Count~ PVannin~ Departme~~ PG19M 94~ PLHGI. ~ , •1~~~5~ I~~I ' I ' \ y ,f i•i~J''- 1 \ 1 S ~ I c t 1 ~.i~~. ~i n • ~ f PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET , ~ a PHONE 458-2274 • y~u3 ~ ~ ~ ili~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 . SPOKANE COUNTY CoURT NoUSf M E M O R A N D U M . 0,opv. ~~t ✓9t/~0~ wAl~'~ ~ 1~R . ,z1S C0. 1~lt~.T . TO. ~4rr~u: ~'aVVIR. l~L'i~ ~"7U T~ rN ~ ~oF 47-Iu : 01-0Y4 sMIJAC FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 509-456-2274 Attenti on : &JAA-L~ }4 U~ A ~ REFERENCE: Lead Agency Destination, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: pe-- /V.P)5 ' 78 L~~-~ I;tk ' 76, Stzd4tw 5 ri dy )h., -b ►'i7 0I , ~ This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) ) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-34 (5) a proposed Declaration of PJonsignificance was issued on Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest op ortunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for The subject proposal or action (IS, 4QMMW LOCATED tiJITHIN THE SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER OR ITS WATERSNED. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GWIE), pursuant to the Environmental Protection Agency's Sole Source Designation or regulations pertaining to this designation, should be prepared. Enclosures FILE ~t5--1zG-79 , - . .:,r,- - ~ ` 1• MJ j i, ~~`~1 \ ' , ( \I, l r ~I ' ' ~ TAFF.R,EVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CT►-iECKLIST r , ; ,k. t•. ,.r.. - SPOHANE COUNTYCOURTNOUSC I, In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental O!•dinance and WAC 19 7=10 , an Environmental Checklist has been submi.tted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the ~<~,2eaA~ as fm~ . i r Uz The following data briefly describes the proposal: A, Action (s) Requested: "Zone Change; `_---Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval; C'nange of Condition - Ot her: ~ S r ~ B. D e s cri p t ion of P ro p o s a 1: ~.~~..G~~.v , U u ~.CU►'~~ . '~~vL~~ ~.Qc.e~e.~e~v.r~ Q~~ n~ n.t.~ ~ .~rn~ Ga ~~~~p .~.U~ U l~ n l v i i! j' j t7b JP- ~ U ~ C. Location of Proposal: fion.-J oA,.,,O II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questa.ons : (1) ✓ Earth (8) Land Use (15) """Energy (2) Air (9) ~Natural (16) ~Utilities Resources (3) ""Water (10) Risk of (17) Human Upset Health (4) Flora (11) v""Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing 9) Rec. (6) ~ Noise (13) ZTrans./ (20) Arch./ Circ. Hist, • (7) '-/Lighf & (14) vl Public (2I) O ther Glare Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: 1081J6- C. Discus sion of impacts identified abovp: ~0010L:- J III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff revievv of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse fmpacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff inember(s ) revi ewi ng checkl i st F1f'Ax1k6O1c- E , • tjry'~~, ~ _ { E~ ~ ~ ~ 1F~`• r 1 ( C1t~!1i'~ 11T f ' ~ ;~,o Fl + I ''~~i -i J 1 Q • ltQnnMC COtIMt♦ GOY1tT MOUSC ENVIRONMEIVTAL CHECi{LIST Introduction: The State Environmental Polfcy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental vaiues both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies fnvolved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following ques[ions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only 5light lmpacts will result. The reviewers of the chec,tlist will be aware of and concern themselves with the deQree of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessaty. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government aecfsion-makers, include your explanatfon in the space provided, or use additional oaqes, ff necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and whfch are relevant to the answars you provide. Complete answers tv these questions now will help ali agencies involved with yvur proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessaiy delay. The following questions apply to lour total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently aoplying or the proposal for which approvai is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your prooosal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allaw all of the agencies which wnll be involved to complete their environmental review riow, without duplicatfnq paperwork in the future. No aoplication shall be processed until the check3ist has been completed and returned to the approprfate County department. State law reQuires exolanations for mverv "ves" and "maybe" anstiver on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required Co provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form beinq used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of prooosals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the nexL question. £WIRONMENTAL CH£Ci{'i.SST FORM j, BACKGROUiVD 1. Name of Proponent: mexuL14 • 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent:* 1311-7 ~P,. ~L`L~ ~z►~l'' ft 3. Il3te Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklfst: Sookane Ccuntv, Wa. 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: . &x-6,C -I- (IF SPACE FOa EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 6. Nature and Srief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, giBneral desiqn elements, and other factors that w'll give an accurate under- G ~ standing of its scope a d nature): ~u►x ' ~~ci . 2~r~+e,.t ~ ~ 4r S'lVt3R. 4MA, 4ML~J . 1 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, fncluding any other informatfon needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the pro sal) : Noa~, ev~ lOr, 4L c.or%2,W oC- %*At coL A~e, :!5pbke*4e- ~ . ~ - ~ 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: Ju.1 ti1l 9. List of alI Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Prooosal (federai state and local - nclu ing ,ezones): ' ~ ~GC,.,25i t~1_OK. ~ `~C'd~1.. ~l~ • ~ Vglo A C'{ 10a. Do You, or the owner in the event you do not own the sub j ect land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or con- nected with thls proposal? If yes, explatn: 140 lOb, Do you own or have options on land neamy or adiacent to this proposai's location? If ye , explaln: t\ a►a;v~ 4"J? ~ ~ S ~r 11. m you know of any olans by others lncluding the owner which may affect the property covered by your rroposal or land adlacent or nearby? If yes, explain: ~ 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the oroposal; if none has been completed, but is exaected to be filed at some future date, describe the na e of such app i at2on fo , . SP~, • II. ENIVIRO NMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) -Yes tilaybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal r=sult in: ! (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in qeologic ~ structures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Disruptions, displacements, compacLion or overcoverinq of the soil? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . -2 - f l .i • (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IL'd' INADEQUATE PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No (c) Change fn topography or qround surface relief features , ^ _ (d) The destruction, coverinq or modification of any unique ~ qeologic or physical features ? . . . , . . , , , , . _ (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either ~ on or off the site ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (f~ Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or chanqes in siltatfon, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of ✓ the ocean or any bay, inlet or la ;e ? . . . . . . . . Explanation: C4VI.5--- 4 SYV" Wd , St1R-~S ~ V[ Y°~ ~.Yh~ ~I9 2. Air. WllI the proposal result in: (a) Air emis sions or deterioration of ambient air quality (b) The creation of obiectionable odors ? , . . . . . . . . K (c) Alteration of air movement, mofsture or temperature, or any change in ciimate, either lo cally or regionally? x . Exzlanation: C~~ • ~ 6wc 4 • _ • . ~ _ • eId CXC. - l~ Tib 3. Water, Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe Vo (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of ~ water movements, in either marine or fresh waters _ (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or ~ the rate and amounc of surface water runoff ~ (c) Alterations to the course or fiow of flood waters (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water ~ body ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Dtscharge- into surface waters, or in any alteration oz surface water quality, 2ncluding but not limited ~ to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteratfon of the di*ection or rate of flow of ground ~ wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (g) Change in the a,uantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or throuqh interception ~ of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? ~ (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or Lhrouqh the seepage of leacnate, phospates, deterqents, waterborne virus or bacteria, ~I or other substances into the ground waters? , , , . , , . _ ~ (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise availabIe ~ for public water sup lies ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ExDlanation: ~ • raill.~%e I~.SC. a wC~ urf2. 1 • -3- (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATII, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,) Yes Mavbe No ~ 4, Flora, Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shnibs, grass, crops, microfloca and aquatic plants) ? , , . , , . , , ~ (b) ReduCtion of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? . , . . . , , , , , , , x (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of e:cisting species? . . . . . , . . . . , , , , , (d) Reduction in acreage of azy aqricul[ural crop ~ Explanation: Yes Mavbe N,:) S, Fauna. Will the proposal result in: ~ (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (biirls, land animals inciudinq reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, ~ insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . , (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna ? , , . , , , , . , , , ~ (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or X result in a barrier to the migration or move:nent of fauna? . (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habftat? Explana tion: Yes VIavbe No 6. Noise. Will the oroposal increase existing noise levels? ~ _ Exotanation: 4t Yes iMaYbe No 7. LiQht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? Exnlanation: ~~rb~G~' ~ . ~ ~4h~t► ~ W~~ . ~ 1►rlS~ Yes Maybe No 8. Land Use. Will the prcposal result in the alteration of the ~ present or planned land use of an area ? . , . . • ~ , . , . _ Explana tion: FV4 l~.~G. b~-~ l S J 44n . ~ P25. . wi~ c~~ ' i , , -4- . (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Mavbe No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources ~ (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explana tion: ~.~ca~.~.~Q~/J c-) p a/vv, -(~jA u,P /-n Yes Maybe N:) 10, Risk of tTn„se-t, Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, peskfcfdes, chemicals, or radiation) ~ in the event of an accident or upset conditions o.. Exolanation: • Yes vlavbe No 11. PoAUlation. Will the prooosal alter the location, ~ distribution, density, or growth rate oi the human popula tfon of an area _ Explanation: ePS?~ 4~e{, ~ 4,p ~ ~4~ • . 12. HousfnQ, Will the proposal affect existing housing, or ~ x create a demand for additional housinq ? . . . . . , . . , _ Explanatfon: Yes 'Maybe No 13. Transnortation/Clrculation. Will the proposal result in: (a) Generatfon of zdditional vehicular movement ? . , . . . (b) Effects on e:cfsting oarking facilities, or der;zand for x new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (c) Impact upon exfsting transportatfon syster,.s ? , , , , , (d) Alterations tv present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods ? , . . . . . . . . ~ (e) Alterations to waterbome, rail or afr traffic? x (fl Increase in Craffic hazards to motor vehicies, bicyclis ts or pes trians ? . . . . . . . . . . . ~ _ Explanation: P+51 W ~ UYU~~ ~p ~ ~Z- Lo u~CC. y~j . ~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Mavbe No 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas ? (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~x _ (b) Police protection? . , , , , . . . , , , , . , (c) s choolS ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k - (d) Farks or other recreational facilities ? . . . . . . . . X _ (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads X _ (fl O ther governmental services ? . . , . . . . . . . . X Explanation: Ad,PL 4L q" wo" ~ S 'c~ • Yes Mavbe o 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: ' (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require ~ the development of new sources of energy? ~ Exnlanation: ~ t x.AsL r~ rl~,'~-isY~ 63 .A ~ Yes Mavbe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural qas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . k _ (b) Communication systems ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Y. (c) Water? . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x _ j (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _j_ _ (e) Storm water drainage ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. _ (fl Solid waste and disp sal? . . . . . . . . . . . . -y- Exnlanation: bf. K4 t k" ~ DI~` ~ '1x • . Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the pcoposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health razard (excluding ~ mental health) ? . . . . . . • • . • • • • • • • • • • - Ex,Dlana tion : ~ -6- ~ ♦ ► (IF ~PACE FOR DCPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P:...£ASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the publfc, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to publfc view? . . . . . . . . , , , , , , , , , ~ Explanation: Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the x quality or quantity oi existing recreational opportunities _ ExoIanation: Yes Maybe No 20. Archeoloqical/F;istorical, Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, ob]ect or buildinq? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Exnlanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best oi my knowledge. I also understand that, should there b¢ any witlful misrepresentatfon or willful lack o f full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declacation of nonsiqnificance that lt might issue tn rellance upon this checkllsta Date. . / Proponent: ~ OR' ftUu.o... ~ (Please Print or Type) Pro onent: &cAer P Addres s: 1-310 E. VWutwaj Phone: IZ"i ~ Person completing fvrm: ~ • ~ Phone: Date: ~ Dapt, or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: ~Ou4ua-~ Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Y/~~~~4 U1( l 17 J77 - -7 • ~N 1N3.W 1HNd_ _?0 (A `y . .~T r,, . % HEM , Y PLAT APPLICATI;:J = r-'IR.r ✓ , tss«s+tss=s~att0-*=M** 43* tlie«it~~`s►t~s~r*!s#~/~~~dt~**iM***~~*~iM~M~**i~~1~i~t~Mtffs*sli~s~~iissi*t~Itw~ss' Pa..rt I- To be comnleted by applicant aaci surveyor , AiiEA kPJ: LISiA.t^TCEMtyl~~**tii*~~i~~~lM*#~iit~li~~~* ss sr ~j►st*,~,~r~s~st.a~*~*~•~***w~r~s~s.*s~ss~s~s~ t3, Tota+ :3mou :l of Ia.na in -tzis Sub ::.•pis_on: Acres Tota1 Number of Lots Proposed densi ty o f the P'l.at : 1 , Lots/Gross Acrp ~or,al emouat of adjoiaing land controlled by this waer or spqaaor: ~ Acres Propoees Use of coat: olled adjoining land: a-tic.tS~x. ~isi~ W_ Ta,ywa`3 dw f_tor:- ~ q ; `dh.at ie the driving distan e' milee to the neareet fire statioa? Shoppi.ng facilities? a, Muaicipal Bou.ndary: P3tT@d a trpe t c: b„ighway to- D~ f~ M ~ A t~! t* s aM a~ s w~~~ a s* k K s s••~ s s~ s s e~ s s~ a s s~r ~ ue a s w,. s s s x r= r~~ s Y s s r r s: w. s s s r a* v= r r a* s* . _e v: ; ~ .3.... ~ 3 ~ " ..r. r.)L ...v ...._...~,5:~ ~ i . Dualexes C Indicate lots for duplexes: Multi-family dwelliag units ( Inciicate wYich lotz: Mobilz Somes ( Other C Descr"-be other use::: Describe anq non-rssidential use vrorosed :.a the Plat.: What :.s v:~e rrpsent use o: ;,he :roger-vf proposeci -t;o 'oe p.i.attoec: List tyme of uees: Cultivated land: ac: es. Pasture: ac-res., Timber: acres. Vacaat: _&M acres. Other: ~ Is keeping of animals desirsd? No Yes ( Type: 11~~LVYrL'LrIl71S~Mil~~+/l~fit~7M!*#M1t;MR~~rt~Mtr!*f+ry~*;fis7/e#~*~l~~taasMasfrasah#1~Af~nssn~syit+Raa~.r es e • s Do yoY plGii.i Vo f iB ^i- 4 - 4'4 ^O~"', ^r_A~~T• •~91 I ;j' n~ Ti1~.'. ~~n'7.^J ~t 1.OptII@at? 'C.VL~I To what level of improvemenz wiL szreeta oe con.szructed: Gravc Curb and Gravel C Cu..b and ~~scribe any combinations of abov :at is the t4me period expected~ :or cecupie ~e deveiopaent oi tae rlat: :rest imnrovemeats compl.eted? f v, ww Substantial aumber oi lot3 occupied? ~ a de~.cation of any land for public use coatempleted? (Parits, schools, etc.) -_:e OZ 111~t3 -:^LCS2C `.O =°et t: _^.DE.'^ -3tlID$t@d S ale Price .~f:,.~A IL..'L~~ a. r e Jo 11. aTo ~ i • 'TA.r7 ~ 1 • W^ i i 3Ly SveCic.~, deed i esi.r-_~v l.r.caZJ .~`ie rzC-l..tded ..n rihe Jal@ •:)Z ? a~iJn No ~ 1( / • ?eS \ ~ . ! lf ",rosil , @xpl3+.n: u~r..Lrr'-~~ssssil~rt#~ltw+~*~as~ss~~wrisncss~~as~~as~sri~~*wrss*t~+~*s•s+~ss+►s~ss~~ssssss~~M•ss~~~~ dicate the proposed aethod oi sewage :isposal : Sept-c `ank 'I':-e3tmeat plant ( Other, or combin,ationa (Describe 1 :adicate the proposed source o2' water su=17: Individu~ weL.: , Private cocamunity system ( ~ . indicate method cf extending serc:.Ze to the lots (Dwell:.ngs) : Gnderground utility eaBe►meats (~C). Overhead ut±.lit`Y eaSL'Ta~ Utilities in streets ( x No easements ( Indicate the d.istance frora this proposal to the aeares t. ?XI'S =ir-9 1Wa :e_ 'r-~ ?'nd= cate size o_' ~earest Taia: _nches . ~ ~ ^ •f J. s s t ~ t s a s i a a••• a c♦ r a r~• s* a• x*■ r r s t** t s* a f t s i f i~~# s* y~ t~~~~~!!~~ i~~ s t i t r~~~ w* s~~ r~~ i~ M~ s M~~• l , a~BP aT~z~ pue a.m~su8 , ~ 1 J ~ ' - ~ ~ - , ~ ~~S • ~ . ~ r ► t~..p . - ~ . . ~ ~ -~a~Ss ~~ES ~sac ~~.oB aa8r) ada~ s~8td ~.z~autmzZas so~ s~tramssrnbas :s s ~Q ~Teag +~z~~si` ~~T'aaE ~q Pe~aZdtao~ ea o~ - ~I ~~"'~d ts~s4ass~strr~~rsss~it~ir~s~aR*ss~tas:ssssssess~sst~s*t*~~R~~ua~awrsru~srs=~sss*ttrcrsat~t~Mra~y~s ~ a~~ ~T~~ rn~c o~~a.8zs a~eu sso~aasnc _ < ~ l~ ~ - ; 4 °~r'C-~ r~ , ^'~f ( pa~ aZdmo~ ptre ar~~ a'$ g`y sme~i IIB~rn ~Tao ~ a.m~~ z S • ~ ~-~~oQOZd sz~ easas o~ epBID Qeaq aa~~ad~eru) ~IIama9tr~zse ~so~~~e~s~~aS •sasn (~.'~.~za~5~ ) Tez.z~snpat a..-r3 ~z~semo~ ,zo~ a~.~,~. as~r.~apE u~ v~: tto tsu. ns s. d ans ~z . ~ us a ) ) . =P4 'Ln' ~ zT'[?r~ P ( tq~ sotr~ q~e a.zae aM~ ' t •88.Z~ 8~T1~S8S ZTiO TJM 8 'CQ OII BT t QO ~'r _ c • II'~. P } . , qn_ s'~:, y .~~l.a:.r .:=~~N. ~:q ..~~~Z~.t~o~ a~ cY - :.~-E~ ! s. « A ~ s a r s t s~~ r rr f t s~ I~ re si • 11t rc . r~c s s; s s r s 1► t~Ir r s a r~t : ~k >>t r. s s~1 s~ r~r • s*:~ t ~Ir R rr Ar x sr ~ is 1~ a K~ t Y s yc f~ t ~t iK r. r~•~ a t s R a s ' '~L^ " ,fG . ,p,,J~ • e~EQ . ~ } ~ , 1 a7 - j; ~ - - - . . . . " ' ~~BQ (pau9 ~J •~s~~a~~ _ ;w:~ ;.;,~:n a;,;~~ _ ~oM u; a ~ ~~tw ~ ~ ~e~ a~tre~i~tu~~BOII ~o Aoz~~ret~ep Stre ~ss,zP~~iri diem ~noa en~odg ~~.red dm IIo a.rnso~stp TIn3 30 ~BZ ~~~-Cr~ so Bot~~Qasa.zc.ass-~m Tn~~:rx ~me ~q asa~ pTno~s ~~.8~ pae~s.~a}rsn os~ I•a5►paTMOta~ dm ~o ~.saq a~{~ o~ p~ .~~t~~n.z~. apsm ~ ~ sasaodsa.: ano~ au~ l~.rnC.~aa :c ~:Y-feIIa~ ar~ .;~p~r~ ~ear►s 'peQBTSSapn~n at~~ 'I , ;-~r, y ; ~ ; {r~~\ a3 ` ~ ~iy' i f ~ O . czZ - ~ - ~ - ' ~ L966 1966 a ~ : asoL,~ ~ . ' ~ , ~ ~ (ss~sPPX) 2 o y , p ~1~~ : a ~ r --r'' . . , - . . ~ ~ ~ pa,~.~ S~ ` s'y~/ ~Sy~ ~0 5,~.~~ ~ ~ ~ S '3 ' ~ ~=Q~B~I d~ e~~S ~~t~ 3o sM~ P~ ~IIa~seda . Td ~~o~ au~~adg a~ 3o Q~IIama.=-rnbaz e~ t~v~ e~zre~pso~~8 tn ttotstesadns .~m septm am ~q pa,~dasd IIaeq Sc.~ ~E~~ tLIL~'~'T~TT'v..T~ 2~ ~^.,a~san~a.: IIC?~EID.It~+;~;. a~~ ~a~aZ3oc~ ~1.~"~T ~L'a~`T~So~~''. ~~;1 ~'1 ~ ~~l Si~C' Q'~s~~~! • ~ syss••as=♦~asssc*r~asss:t~sssrs«wr.trsarsssss~sfsts*~c~st4«it~s+tf~~f~M#tttRt!«*~Mrtt~~R~R.7iL1W1lGJ••."11'1V11fJLJY N~: 2u0:;,~ :.:.8~~'-M :98~ • :~~t~Z.I~~B~ ~ + stq~ o~, a~tv,~ s ap~zaosd o~ a~~e~~~z.z s ~o saii~r~~~ ~ s P ~ . ~ 'tP . ~~T?~n ~ ?'I .rssswssr~s..*.s.:s*.:..~.sess~~s**tss~~e~ssss*sssrsr~wart~~,r*.~r~ss*~ssMMitf~rt(PanIIZ~tzo~~ - C~TI~~ ~ ar ( a an~ _~uo ) Z~03 l~IOI~b~I''~cid~f S~''"s.d .e~- Y'1~~ i~~ : ~ S I L I E X ~ - - - ~ E XH I 3 I T A PRELIMIlVARY PLAT A.PPLICATION FOIM (Continued) Page 3 :.~**_*~:~***~~**********~**~*:~**~**~~*~#►«....~~s**....~#~:.**«*~:~.•~*:~►~.*...~.«~:~,~,~#,.~ •Part IV - to be completed by County Engineers Office A. County Engineers Office requirements for preliminary plat<hav-p (have nQt) been satisfied. T~.C. p2o PpS~ 12,&,4.lg BqE7 C1~7~~ep 0 A4r2T~4 I B. Signature p1~ PErZT C..4iv~ Av~[-3 4q (;~qe7 ~ ui • L ture title date s**.ssrt*~*s*********si+s~***~r~~*****~***M+s*~ic*~►*****s+t~*ss*~*s*ssssts*s~i~#sw**R**s*~srs*ss~* Part V- to be completed by County IItilities Dept. A. Ccunty Utilities Depsrtment requirements for preliminary plat av (have not) been sati s r ied . r ~ ' /4~ ` ' ~ U &cw-. B Signature ~ • ~ 12- ~ 7 L signa ur 3nd title date This part ~o be completzd by Planning DepQ.rtment P? ar.ning Department Information I Late Submitted: Checked by: o ti % 0 ~ 6 PrelicainarY Plat Fee : ? ; ..~t. - ~ , T; ~ i hool ~ L str _ ~r~,,~~ GQ~ Sc E)e.sting Zoning: ~-t Checklist Fee: ~C., G Zone Change File No.: ~ = " ~ 4* <<Y~--~ Date Established: ~ 7- ~z--- ~ Number of Lots: Advertised Zone Upgrading: Plat File No. : Za f,~ Location: Section / r Township o~r Hearing Date : Ra.nge : U P1at Name: Abs. / . ~ rJ~Av~ SI , CLARENCE E. SIMPSON RICHARD L SIMPSON CHARLES E. SIMPSON Ularertce e. smt-7.4on engineeriy 'qric. CIVIL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS Regutcred in Watbingrvn and Idabo TELEPHONE 926_1322 OFFICE N. 909 ARGONNE RD., SPOKANE, WASH. 99206 ~ ~ JULY 14, 1978 PRELNINARY PLAT BELCHER' S AMITION The West 2 of Tract 122 of Opportunity as recorded in Volume K of plats, page 20 in Spokane County, Washington. I,ocated in the South 2 of Section 15, T. 25 Id. , R. 4~+ E.W.M. E. S~MA ` WA4,~,✓c f s ~ 9 7 9967 - ~ ~ 0 aSt~~~ ~ %J/0 N At. ~ ' ; • i J . ~ . ~ . ~T.AN2~'MA•a•~i~t~~IY.4 1 •a~14 1'♦ .111 v RECEIPT Date r ~ 19.zg 0"ti 7 :3 Received From ~ Address 6-6 0 ~ ~ ~ " Do i !a rs $ Fo&I e.a~ ACCOUNT NOW PAID aMT OF ~ CASH 1 I _ GO _ ACCOUNT ~ AMT PAID I ~ CMECqT- - ~ BAl ANCE I MONEY C2 ~~~~+~+a CU ~i i r A a 1~;~~1~~Y~,y~ ~~p~~'~ r•~ DUE I...____....J J ORDER 8K806 p•a'ff~rn~ t 1'~ ~ ~ t' ~ , . . I . ~ o- , ► ~ 1',4•' ia,se, i ~.1 ~ i►i t . r~,, , ,,,~'~j~v ~.,~",it..`~. , PRELIMINARY PLAT CONF:ERII1ICE ~CHECKLIST FOR RlaV V-Dv~- -7- C TT3E FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE BY THE PLANNING DEPARTMIlVT FOR HEARING BY THE PLANIVING COMMISSION : ~ 1 . PLAT APPLICATION 2. LECzAL DESCRIPTION 3. ENGINEERS SECTION MAPS2 ' 4. ASSESSORS SECTIOPJ MAP (0)" 5. PRMDIINARY PLA2 MAPS (04 6. IIWIROPTMENTAL CHECKLIST 7. DEVELOPNLENT PLANS . r,~ ► - ~ r~ ~ SIJ C ~ ' - . C f - g . coMMnvTS : . eZ- _ ~ 4 ~ `r C~ ' This document must be returned to the Plat Administrator at the tlme application is made. ti , Plat Administratpr~ ~ . Current Planning Achministrz~torl 1 • I ~ ~AGENDA, ~eptember 29,& 1978 TELEPHONE N0. 9/15) 456-2274 SPOKAN E COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ~through be9inning 9/18) 456-2205 Time: Friday, September 29, 1978 - 1:30 PM (Item #3 on afternoon agenda) Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor N. 721 Jefferson (and Broadway), Spokane PRELINiINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION , Agenda PE-1225-78, BELCHER'S ADDITION item ZE- 126-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL C. 8 a. Location: Section 15, Township 25N, Range 44, E.W,M. The West 1/2 of Tract 122 of Opportunity as recorded in Volume "K" of plats, page 20, in Spokane County, Washington. Located in the S 112 of Section 15, T 25N, R 44 EWM. b. Sponsor: Marvin Belcher E. 13717 Valley Way Spokane, WA. 99216 c. Engineer: Charles E. Simpson N. 909 Argonne Road Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 4.8 Acres e. Number of Lots: 15 Lots f. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural (established 3/27/42) h. Proposed Zoning: Single Family Residential (R-1) i. Water Source: Vera Water and Power j. School District: Central Valley #356 k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site systems 1. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. . . , . _ ~ ~ - _ i ~ it~f. ►eo~ ~v + . a ~ • . r . - i •OO.t j . " ~ R-oct + ...o• , J ~ wnr i , ' 1~''IiM1~E . tc ~•u.ob i + t r f Ylf.kl ~4 I ~ p i~~ [v w~+ Q k __-.._...a.r • • ' ' f ~ A r r \ r ~ ^ - _ } 1 w T'l - J ~ ' ~w~ " "AV"_ ~ •vE r`_~~ ,.••l e ~ ~ _ • y. a [ - M^ i~+" . t ~ n..._•.~_--' M1{ y , _,_..ti •