The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1211-78 & ZE-91-78 J ' t • ? ♦ AGENDA, July 28, 1978 TELEPHONE N0: 456-2274 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION . , Time: July 28, 1978 (Friday) 1:30 P.M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor 'rJest 1201 Sroadway, Spokane (also known as N. 721 Jefferson) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APJD ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 5. PE-1211-78, LESLYE FIRST ADDITION ZE- 91-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRI.CULTURAL SUBURBAN a.. Location: Section 3, Township 25N, Range 44, E.W.M. The South 112 of Tract 41 of Trentwood Orchards,as per pl at thereof recorde-d- _a n Vol ume "M" of Pl ats , on page 16; Situate in Spokane County, Washington. b. Sponsor: Randy Teeter N. 109 University Road Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Surveyor: Lawrence L. Leinweber E. 12929 Sprague, "D" Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Site Size: 2.3 acres e. Number of lots: 8 lots f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 j. School District: East Valley #361 k. Method of Sewage Disposal Individual on-site systems l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. ';F{~i:'~: i: i'ii=~re ~o'~i ~of~ !S L 97• 17~ .--w..~i+1. -.-.i •s f~ •s . w s. .~a . .a/ i t . /1, ~ - ° r 1 e. rr. ~ ~ ~ u . , ~ ~ I . - - ~ - - - - j Q„ - =T - - i . . _ ,y ` t.w4 ti 7D• ,4 9~ ' ' ~I I I a z ~ e " '..1:• ~ ~ I ~ • , ° ' • - ° • o ~ ' p ' tl ~ ~ 7~ volVo11~Y I • . t Hpn qh 9dr ~ f .I ~ _ + _ • - ~ • • ' ~ , - - _ ~ Z. ~ P.o•r ~ . •a. ota • rppC,~ a ~ i i .,c- .~j ` M l.. ..r 1 . _ tr ♦ A._ . • r ~ D Q tc to., ' ' ~ ~ ~.-r----'--' . r. a-._ ` - _ ' _ y fI - _ t_ - - - ~ - ' - - " ' 'Q. • `r r .w-l - ~ ' A_' U.^"1.ti'l~~J SPOf ~ ~ ~ i F~OLG i!✓c; ~I~ L /NDUS Tf se.co (.p _ - - - --C. _ _ c .vk . . ~ FILE DOCUMENT LOG F i 1 e#1:~7-1c~11 ~ Zq Applicant -rE Date Started ~ 7~ DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION ID# Date Received h tla) ~ ~ fl Pr I Yt9-P 1 y A)9zy YA . ~f7k ~ ~ J ~ g 79 v P>)- -7 - Z8-~~ . -7 - i q - 7 9 a-g 7 k n G U -a-'g , -7 f? y 8 77-X0_7 9 r 1 1 ` 0 • ~ ~j O ~ PRELTa,TDTARY PLAT CcJNF~''yRII\TCE CHECKLIST FOR ~ THE FOLL4WINtx DOCUMENTS SHAL.L BE SUBMITTED PRI4Fc TO ACCEPTAr1CE BY TTfIE PLANNITdG DE.PARTNIENT FOR HEARII`dG $Y THE PLANNING CO*IISSION : 1. PLAT APPLICATION LEGAL DESCRIPTI01`1 -J ' 3. FNGT11+E SECTION NIAPS (2) 4. ASSESSORS SECTIODT NIAP (1 ) 5. PRELLMINAIRY PLAT MAPS (6) 6. ENVIROIZ'IETSTAL CHECh'I,IST 7. DE'VII,aFMENT PLATIS ~ n t ~~~'~~y~sa~'~'~~'~.. • r'~d ~V~~(~..~ t ~ '6 YAr~~J~"~. , 8 . O= 4~ ~ . C0~~1~ IENTS o ~y .L ,'rrNf,, ~';✓.~,l,o' J " "~y/r,~' ~ ~r*,~ .Afi~,~, ,f'~,,' ,~'J•'/,,/`~ ~,.;Y~ 'f`N'/','' ~e el. ca .l r"r .a.,. ~,..:v o' .r.,,. ! l✓f'~i ~,~r e. r ~,~P, y/d~~i~ ~-'f1 ' e .~}~~,%r:ar'.r ~ ~vf~ lIhJ(',yML Jy~'C .~'~J r ~G' -'~r ~ . This document mu.st be returned to the Plat Administratar at the time appli cati on is made. , Plat Admi~ijtrator 1 ;r,!~'ti'~,,'-,~~" 1,~ ~ , Current Flarmin; Administrator . . -86 fo399 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNN COMMISSIONERS FOR SPOKAIVE COUNTY IN THE MATTER OF CORRECTING THE FINAL ) PLAT NAME OF LESLYE FIRST ADDITION } R E S O L U T I O N PE-1211-78 AND ZONE CHANGE ZE-91-78 ) TO LESLYE ADDITION IN SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP ) 25 NORTH, RANGE 44 E.W.M., SPOKANE ) COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, that the Final Plat of Leslye Addition was incorrectly listed as Lesiye First Addition on the Final Plat Resolution #78 1614 which was signed on December 18. 1978 and ' the Zoning Resolution #79 1150that was signed on August 13. 1979. The following legal description and zone change is for the corrected final plat of Leslye Addition. LESLYE ADDITIQN the S 1/2 of Tract 41 of Trentwood Orchards, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, on page 16, Section 3, Township 25, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. . PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF , 1988. BOARD OF COUMY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHlNGTON . ~ - /'vo ,ATTES!r:- . ~ v- -IAIIL-LIaIM E. DONAHUE ~ ...CLERK-Qf, THE BOARD .f By: . ~ No e 78 1 6z4 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COU1VTYg 1rJASHINGTONo 14-1 211x7~jl P ~L:".~' ~ Izl Tls~ ~'tITTER FIL1.~t. ~fa' 9 `'ti~ F1i~.r. ~ ~~F R,.I~sLYE FIt::~~` d`~D`~ITlUii L~rCstT~~ Li l R E S 0 L U T1 0 N WiTi4+~5 taN ~ Vltl? ~i/SIAP ~rs.~~ 4~ai.►;llw `.,i' iwr~a.fiv~1 (1WAtMd 1 ) BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUIVTY; WASHINGTON, that the final plat of fi,~ l~ ~i~ t` . ..70! ~ie> ~r Y~ { t-~, .~ir ~E..1~~'E 9'~ 1~.~i;4~~R~~Fs ivs a ~Vf ~ a '3' ~ ?"~1«~.l:i'~ l ~j +~d 11~~~s', ~'~l~ ~~e , ~ `~`"ct~~.', ~t ~ ~D ...+~i, ; , . , • ~vusurv V w 1 c~ PUts! ~~i vatl~,' X,,, roction y ' Tt,v,t~C~17' ! i eJ W ni t~l t• ~ ~ ~ ~ E-MfL~~ ~ ~~~c.i,:~.: t.~~t'~~ ; g~~ ~,~i... • more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokarie County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way ded _cated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a sep- arate resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF 9 BOARD OF COtJNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTONo HARRY . L'RA R6NfD, cmivil. RAY W. CHRISTENSEN 1ERRY C. KOPET ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND Cle the Bo d By• `i ' . . . ° .r '.1:aLii•' .t ...i:..i..i.ti::+I.It` . . i.. . w'~`` ^ N o 79 1,150 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ZE-91-78 - ) IN THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE ZONING ~ MAP FROM AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL ~ R E S O L U T I O N SUBURBAN ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION ~ 3, TOWNSHIP 25, RANGE 44 E;.W, M. SPOKANE ~ COUNTY, WASHINGTON. ~ ~ The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commissfon has given due notice of the hear- ing on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required; and that the said Planning Com- mission concurs in the plan to zone the following described property as: AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: All that area platted a s Leslye F irs t Addition, loca ted in Section 3, Township 25, Range 44 E. W, M. Spokane County, Wa shington . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above,-described property be, and the same hereby is zoned under the classification of AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN as defined in the Zoning Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amended. PASSED.•BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF AU G 13 M9 , 1979. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON VERNON W. .HLAND Clerk of t ard By: ~ Deputy . This is to certify that this is a true and JERRY C. KOPET correct cc~ y,01esolution HARRY M. LARPIED pas sed by , No. 15 the Boar thi ~~9of ~ - ~ 19 By; ~ Deputy ZONE CHANGES POSTED ON ZOlVi-WG MAPS )plication No. Res. No, Res. Date ,om : A T o : :>sted By: Date Posted: _ ~2d1 ~res: Sec. Two. Range e-*LtJ )Zq EAST M A (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' (Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' ~ ((File Map)Mylar Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' (File Map) Tracing #39 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' A)iQ (File Map) Metro ~*11 (Director's Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' /t/ 4 (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile N ~ (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles ~ __(Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' tWa'1 Map) 'Front .-)ff~cP Scale: ~ - 1000' , _(File Maps) Mylar Jffice Scale: 1" ~ 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 900' MIP Niap) Tracino 434 (Soc'h East Zoning Maps) ScalP- - 1000" Fi le Map) Metre *l f(DJrectors Office) Scale : 1" - 2 000' _ (F. -e Map) Countv- Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile (FiIP Map) Count-, (!viap Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles . (Score Cards) Middle Jffice r , Transamerica y TwnSameric,%, , Title Insurance Company ' Title Insurance Services North 720 Argonne Road " Spokane, Washington 99206 (509) 922-2222 CERTIFICATE TO PLAT C Em j V, E Order No. 91818-M SEP 1 8 1918 Certificate for Filing Proposed SPOKANE COUNTY Plat of LESLYE ADDITION PLANNINIG DEPARTMENT Spokane County Planning Commission N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington Gentlemen: In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following nescribed land situate in Spokane County, to-wit: The South half of Tract 41 of TRENTWOOD ORCHARDS, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, page 16; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: GREENACRES DEVELOPMENT COMPANY. EXCEPTIONS: 1. 1% excise tax, if unpaid. 2. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3. 3. Restriction contained in Quit Claim Deed recorded as Document No. 146870B, as follows: The sale or use of liquor shall at all times be prohibited on this property. NOTE l: General taxes for the year 1978 have been paid in full in ` the amount of $55.45. (Parcel No. 03541-1102). (cofttinued) << ; Page 2 . Order No. 91818-M Records examined to September 11, 1978 at 8:00 AM . TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By: Phyllis Vaughan cc: Leinweber & Taylor, Consultants 7W ~ s .',_'Y* " )r.~^4. + + _ • _-~.•r ` , y~ ~~N, . t~ 4 ~;~n~~^ :1 _a - * . . ~ . ~ ~ . • • . . ~ ~ ; • , • i' ~`1; .•~'C~ _ ~ ~ • ~ ' ~ ~ ~\Y Jj .-~,L~ ~ . . r" , . " ~ . ~ ~l . . r ~ ' ~ ` ~ ~ Pr• 't~° ` y1 ~ ~ ' t ' , . • , ~ 1 • ' - . . - -..„R ~ - ~ A ~ .t~. 1 : - ` ' ~ ' ~ i . , i . - a. ~"1 . . . ~ _ . . _'t . _ , , . . ~ 3. - ~ ' ~i Y. , ~ s . .a , , • , - • . ~ ; ' , r . . . , t'. . , , • , ~ . - - _ , , . ' . . . . . . ; ....~-~,;``ir,~a:_~ . ;a ' ~ ~ ` ~ ' ' ' ' ~ . . . , . , , , . , , c, . y y'-' ' ~ ' _ s%. ' ' , , , , - ; _ '°C : ' . ' . . • , , ~ , ` . ~ ` 1' ~ra ' , ' . , y • -O'v . . , , . . - .-0 .,J- • ~ ~ d , . . . . , ' i Y . ~ ' ~ J ' . " ' . ~ o ' . ~ ~4 ~ ~ ' ' ~ . ` ~ . r .ri"~.~ve"b. ♦ ~ f.r ~ , f - Yt ~ , i . ' ~ . . . ~ ' ~ ' .i , ` ` i. • , ~ _ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ r♦' ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ _ . ~ , ~ . ~ c ~ , . ~ ~ T ~ ~ ' i ~ . ~ ~ ~dl:.. ~~.\w _ - - ' : . . . , . • . . , ` . , . . . - : , , ~ ~-~L% nr - . . , . . _ _ . . ~ • . _ , p. . , , • • . • , . . - ~ , ` ` _ _ _ f' _ . ~ - ' , , . l ' • . i , ` t , - > ' . . ~ , , ~ ~ • :Z ~.''~f~ . ° > . . ' ` - • • ~ • rn. ,r: - ~ . ~ . w ~ . ~ ~ : , ' V '`iv+.'' . , , • ~ • ' . , . , . . i~. • 9,'. _ ' ; ' ^ , . ~ .7 i -J • ; • ~ ; e.` , . ^ , . ~ ' , . ~ , • .f " - • ! ' - ~ ' ` • s , " • . ' , . ' , . . . . . . ' . : . , - , . • !ry ` « 'dd• ' . w . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ • c.~+' ~ ' . J . c~ • r . O-~ . , " . ~ . ~ " ' . ~ , ~ • ' „ ~ ~ : ~ ~L'/E'' •f~i~Rl`f.'~~! No. ~ ' ' ' ' e~,,.,~✓ , Sl& Ar . -E, : ; : : . . J . . ~ ~~2.,~~ • ~ ~ : . ~ ~ :3.~~;.~~„ ; - _ : ' 4 ~ . . _ . . . 7 . . , d , - . ~ . ~Q r ~ ~ 0S~' 1 ' ' ~S Q. ~ , • ~ , . I ' • ~ • • A f y~`~i~ r " ~ , ^ t r 1 a 4 S ~ F?~ ~ ~1 ~ p ~ ~ ~i~ k ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ A d~✓ l~'~i•~ _ ~ ~ ~ t ~ : ; _ ' . ~ " ~ . p ~ Q (y~,/~ A; ^ C~.'' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ , ' . . ~ - ~ ' . ; , ~ ' , ' , ~ 4~;~.p ~C1U~~ "kf,~f~~~ ~ o-:<~<. T: l~ ~ . - ~ • ll'7~( • : : , . .:.~.0 . _ 3 ~ • 1a~_ ~~~r~ 4 7F 3 n v ~ ( '~,c'! ~ _ ' ' y ' , , - . •~^~S'~'~ . j ' , " ~ I~t.v ' n"ti~ ~ x' I _ 't ~ . I/. ~ ~ ~ I,~d.n"~' ~ ,..~;t`~ T 00 n , .~r~ ; ' . J , ` ~ a - • . ' . ~ ,:!*p 1~~~~ ~ ~ ~ IVr^,~ ll~J ~ ~y ~ _ . . ' ' ~ t• ^47 J ~ ~,'i~ - ~ ; 1 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ g il Ga. • , ~ - ` ` r_ ~l 4 . 14- 6'JIPa ~`•r~• ~~c-~.._ Y ~1 ~ . ~ t U U~ " " v, ' . . . , • . ' ` ` R . -9 ~ e 7 ~ • ~ , . , . , ~ ~ ~ • r~ ~ . ' , , . • _ ~ ~I~ ' t"'iEROY_ ; • ~ ' ~ ~ ' ~J' ° uo L~ r~ ~ ~y~ , ' ' ' ~ • , - . ~1~ ~ R nj~ y C, . . . . ' ~ . . ..~~~•••-J 2 ~ ~.v/t~"~ ' ~ ' • • ' - . ~ ~.-a.~. ~ ' ~ 2 ( ~ ~,q , „ ~ ~ ~ ,1~ `~p bf v''J VY+ . 'Y = ; ' : ~ ' . • • • , - - - , ' • t,f,~~ - _~~['d~,: ~s , ~i¢•.ti..._~~0, •~O' - ~ . ~ , j ' • ~ ~ , • • . V~+~,~~~ ~ .:r~-:~ ~ ~ ! - ~ . , . 6 FEdQ ~ c~J~ Av L ~ ~AC n~ ~24~aS ~ .a. ~ ~ • ' r , ~ ` ~ , , ` . ' , . , • ' : r~ c ~ +n I"9 - ' w~ ( ~ . . ; ; ` . - ~ 4 I - . , ~ ' _ ~ , ~ ' , . • ' ►4.g,. ~ Q► - a a+ ►l,.`a?]J ~ ~ , ~ • , . : . ~ , ; d, ' - ~ , ~ ,j C " ~ ¢ <dK . ;L-~1' ' • ~ ~ . ~ t . , _ _ ' , : . ~ ~ , ' eF~'-~ , . , : , . . ~ ~ , , ~ t,~ _ : " . ' ' ' ' ~ `=v' . . ' • . N ~ ~ ~ , ''~"a rs co . ' ~ ' ' ; , ± - ~ ~ ~ • _ , ' . • , . ~ l40 ~1 ' ; ~ Ta . . „ , oO sp ~ ~ • , i6t' ~T J _ ~.`s"`~+C.... i . . . • ~ ' ~ , ~ ,0, 7 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ • 1 9' • ~-r ~ ~ \ ~ Ri~NSA~:f ~!CA rl?:LE INSUR~,t~CE t;OAjFAi~Y A : f 7<0 A C GQNf' E RQA9 `POKAi~E, WA. 99206 r' . • ' ~ ~ ` '2 yy • ~ , ' 1 ~ . . 61• ~.s' kF5° ~ ~9 ~5' ; ~ ~ ~%C~-• r'~ e3 ~ .xbv~.: . ~ • , , ~ ~Q~~''' .~z~ 2 r- ~ ba ~ '$a p Q~~ • ~ ~ - ~ '',~n G9 -''ci o r ~ ~ , ~ . F~ ~ • • ~ . . A ; h,S DI~~11 tS r,,aQP aot8ly Ir~ thp ~ ~ ~ ! , ~ -r7a ~ . 3 ;,.OCd~ing SO;d D,OF11t9P.,~ 2110 Ihp C tg S9?°~q.e^1 084IdfiP~ 1~~ i oi ~ r~ ' ~ n4• ~j} ld')Illty lOf Vdqd110'sti, td aP,j J 'J'T^ a4~et~a~~~o-d n• . i M , ~ r ar „~al Su~ YCV. ~ , r y FINAL PLAT CliI:C;K LIST ; 1. t'iiial l'!iAt Leroycd k 'l. SuUdivision namu mk 3. Section, township & rangu 6k 4. 5ponsor(s) iiamc (s) ' 5. C,iglneer or surveyor 6. Sheet size 29" X 36" 7. North point, scale (100' - 1" or 200' 8. Boundary Line DA~ ` i 9. Location & widths of proposed streets, alleys, rights r ~ t of way, easements, parks, open spaces, & proper labeling of spaces to be dedicated to the public 10. Layout & names of adjoining subdivisions ~ a. Replats - Layout & Name of the replat e t shall be shown by dashed lines 11. Street riames - consistent with existing streets ln city and county. Check against name s on round name wheel. . 12. Lot sizes - i.e., 80' X 125' with 10, OUO sq. ft. for single tamlly lot ~ Cul De Sacs - 80' at builditiy line 1'J. Layout, number5, and dinienslons of lots & parcel s 0k 14. Necessary enyi,leeriny data dk 15. Does dedication State, if incilvidual water and/or d 26/c/ 1t-A4'7f- public sewers will l,e provldeci ln accordance with preliminary plat of approval. 16. Notarized certificatlon by a professional land 5 urveyor . 17. Private re strlcttons , if aiiy 4W 18. Nurnber and typo of unlts d~ 19. Dedication of streets to the public . ~ 20. Easement verification & illustration GcJl~~~iQ ,NEEa ~ 'll Check easernerits, clouds on uroperty, etc. from Title Rc:Nort l~~+G~~~►,~ - C~~/ 02- F.¢ CW sEV77d TA4)t rwwp 3115 REV 8-73 ~ - THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY ~ - ; -~s, ' '-~°.e ~-.•r . Electric and Natural Gas SerLice P.0 BOX 3127• SPOKANE, WASHiNGTON 99220•(504) 484•0500 December 15, 1978 Spokane County Planning Commission North 721 Jefferson Street ~ c v ton 99201 R ~ Spokane, Washing Re : LesLye Addition I,ocated in Sec. 3, T- 25N $POKANE COUNTY R- 43 EbJM, Spokane County Washington PLANNING DEPARTMENT Gentlemen: The above described sub-division is located within Washington Water Power Companys electric service area and will provide electric service to each lot. incerely, . • R. J. Westberg Assistant Marketing Su ervisor Spokane Division Marketing RJW:cm cc: Mr. R. Teeter Teeter & Associates North 109 University Rd. Spokane, WA 99216 5 E R V I N G T H E I N L A N D E M P I R E 0 f W A 5 H 1 N G T 0 N A N D I D A H 0 ► Pacific Northwest Bell R ECEIVED DE C 15 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY . PiAlVNING DEPARTMENT December 15, 1978 Spokane County Planning Commission North 721 ,Jefiferson Street Spokane, Washingtor_ 99260 llEar Sir: 1'he Ut:ility easements shown on the Final plat of r Pcl.,e ndd; t-; nn are sa-tis-factory to the Pacifi.c Nort;hwest BelZ Tclephone Company. ~ ~ G. D. Flcming Right-of-Way Agent North 904 Columbus S-t;reet . Spokane, 41'ashington 99202 LOT AREA STAfi tST h.S F.UP: L.E_S.L~E A'DOI TION FiLE: 1-Z1l ~ ~LOCK 1 AREA = 45131. SQ FT i 1.04 AC1~~~~ ACCUM ARFA = 451 3t. SO ~ 1: 04 ACRES) OI~~~~ENCE = 0. SQ FT 13LOCK 2 ARFA = 39371. SQ fT t 0*90 ACFkES} AC(-,U4 AREA = 39371. SO FT i 0.90 ACRES ) DIFFERENCE _ 0. 5Q Ffi ~"~RnS5 DENSiTY: 3 LOTSI'ACRE r NET `1ENSI1 T i LOTSliiCRE LARGEST LOT: 1179R. SQ F1" SMALLEST LOT: 9553. SQ FT , f~~ ERA GF L i:l T : 10569. SO FT - ~ OF LOTS: H ~ THE FOLLQWING LnTS ARE LFSS TF~AN 10000. SO FT: BLK LOT SQ Ffi 7IFF PERCENfi - ~ 2 1 9926. 74. 3.743 2 2 9653. 347. 3.465 2 3 98 TS. 122. 1.221 1 2 4 9914, 86. 0.865 ~ . - - - - - - - - - - - - l.OT AREA STAT ISI S FQR: LFSLYP ADi)IT lON FILE :L21l ~Y17 8 BLOCK I AR'EA = 45181+ SO FT i 1.04 ACR'ES~ ~~CUM AREA = 45181. SQ FT ~ 1.04 ACRES) 0 C FFER ENCE = n. SQ FT f3LOCK 2 AREA = 39371. ~Q FT C 0.90 ~CRFS 1 ACCUM AREA = 39311, SP FT [ 0.90 ACRES) DIFFERENCE = n. SO FT GROSS DENStTY: 3 LQTS/ACRF NET DENStTY. 4 LOTSIACRE ~ L+ARGEST LOT: 11798. SO FT = SMALLEST LAT: 9653. SO FT ~ ~ AVERAGE LOT: 10569. SQ FT N OF LQTS: 8 > ~ ~ ~ - w THE F~1LLO'~I~l~ I~OTS ARF LE'~S THA~N t~3Q~~. 5~ ~T: s ~ 13LK LnT SQ Fr Dlr-F PERCENT 2 1 9926. 74. 0.743 2 2 9653. 347. ~ ~465 ? 3 9878. 122* 1.221 z 4 9914. 86. 0.865 I.,- - - ► Th. Hwno Newspap*r o1 5pokane Vol{oy SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD P. o. so= 14027 OPPORTUNlTY, WASHINGTON 99114 y Dote 13, 1978 . . _ _ . ~ _ . . - , . _ , • , - Sllitt' U . ~ . . - . . . ~ , . . _ . . 91t-2440 In Actounl Wkh: a_ ~•a :lr ra'' . , • ~ l • - t , ~~,Z ' ^I~l. 18o _ 7::r& Roum wHh »miftonce ta atture proper credit. 400 qFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION BTATE OF WABFIINGTON, ( v. COL NTY OF BPOSANE. S J;L--HN C. VLAHOVICH beioQ firai dnly aworn ~ on oath deposes aad sayA that he ie the 1~~' of the 8POKANE VALLEY HERALO, a weekly newapapsr. That said eewe- NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE naper ie s leQal newspaper and it ia now end hse been for more than ei: ' SPOKANE COUNTY BOARDOF montha prior to the date of the public.ation hereinafter referred to. publiaherl COUNTY COMMISSIONERS in tt1N EAjT.lI&h IBIIRliB(=0 CODtli1ll8IIV AA a weeklv newspaper in SpoEcane County. Pursuant to ttie provisions ot Chap+er 4J.71C RCW, nOtita ;s hefrbY w'uahinRton, and it is now and during a11 of said time was printed in an offir.e thr Spokane Count commissp~onven r.~s that aia mainiained at the aforesaid place of pubiication of ssid newapaper, which an Aupusi ia. 1 v~e, take Ine ac+►a► ckscribea aelow said neasPaPer has been aPProved ss a leRsl new"Per by ordar of the 8u- . anY ec►ion to SM asi0e, er+1an reYiew Ewrior Caurt oE the Btata of Wasbington in a,ad for Bpoksas Connty. That the or otAarwlsc challenge 6uCh actipn on fhe qfovnds d nan•comPllancE witn the ` ovisionsot Cna ter 43.11c aCw (state r~Ot1Ce O f ~tCtlOI? ~nv+ran►r~rntei ~oikr Act) "ii re annezed ie a trtle oopy of s cammence0 an OctooK a 107e, a be berred. Thc aclion taktn by the Spoksne County COmmisSWner3. nOtice o1 wh►Ch +s nereov 9ive.,, was as ioiiows. (1) ApprOved ACiiOn Prellminarr an it ws►a pnbliabed ia regular issuee (and not in supplement form), of ssid Piet d leslye AOd'n. IZl Dt►saIaflcn. a provel to Plet • ►o~s j ac.es on ~+eror AYenu* aewspaper onae esah week for s psriod of wo consecntive t31 Such sctipn petlamlC to p00erty tommoniv krown as and or eescrttea 6tr. Sentember C~ ss: 2.5 acres on Meroy 5treet eExr ~cs, eammeTlC1II Lba. ~OI • ~ l~ endea! D~welr► 5otes Roac and Blake aep R On 7 R4ad in tht NE' a Of SK. 3 Twp. 25 N. R L/ E.W.M. l4► pertinent documents mey oe 17th September 'xamined durinp narmel COUnty `nd endinR on the dby Of • 4_••• a,Siness na,rs at me s~okane ta,nr„ both datea incluaive, sn~i that euch newspaper w~aa rpz~li?:-►rl•. r~i,'rih~~t,,(? ~ Planninp Departmenl. #ii jerferson 5lreef, its Kubr~cril►ers durinR all uf said periai. S anonc (sikene. WaihinqtOn 9v10~ 45e,7274. NOfice Given By Trrter Raalfy -L Filed bv' PertY M. TayfOr. EnOinler 91-4 13 1 fL-- Nubscribed and sworn to before me thie Q!. . . ~nt ; otr►r% Ynblic in and or the Stile uf W n~toa, Residing ac: Spokanc, 1N A ~ I ~ . • r AFFIDAVIT OF POSTIlVG S E P 121 j ~ r~STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S P 0 KA N E C 0 U iy i Y ) ss PLANIVING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) 00~e r r,I ~h • ( aAl being first duly r ~ sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the /,..?7-4 day o f Sep74em bF Y , 19 7eY, ~ I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspicuous manner on the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which is the subject of the ACTION, to-wit, the following locations: 1. Nr44k erwo. ~Ifl-i~,.~,,~,~..~~ . 2. 4v,e , . 1,&rCd~ 8a~.r~,, frDpc-y-~ . ~ 3' 4vr AyC). Ldil 1 t 4. 'f`-^6w~ t~'°x~ ~''t f1'~~ " V ►~'t QP^~ DATED thi s ~ 3~ day o f 1970D-, • ~ 4• ~ / • ~4 \ ' L SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this ,Z' ~~i.~ • day of , , 19J~ • . 1 -`,u....ejrp rob•~`,~~~`~~~aa ~~;~(,1 Notary Public in and -f State of - • ashington, g re si din at S kane ouJ w o J~~%', 115~ 1i n r - n S• 7•-yt• ' ~+A7t~i'~6L~s=~ . • / t r • • FILE 0 7if v ? • ' THRESNOLO OETERMIIVATION ~..,,,~,...,~II 3~.~ifi~~ ~ , u . ♦.n..wt '_"nr~L.SC ~ ~ DECLARATION OF (proposed/final) ",,~5VO~',~~MAV (significance/nonsignificance) 1. Oescription of Prooosal : ~ eor 2~ ao ~ 6 tq JO-M "R .~~~~e g4tWoLY p~~~,~~~', ~ ~ ~~~~yJCF jc~'e*Isr 2. Qroponent: 7TF7V9 3. Contact Person: ~ OZ Phone: on 4. County Action (s) Requested: Zone Change; 46----" Preliminary Plac Approval: ~ Final Plat Approval; Change of Condition Other: _oCaciOn of ?ropOSal :eP , av ~ V~ ~r~~~~ ~ ~ vek , " b. Lead Agency: SPOKAPJE COUNTY, WASHING70N proposai has been determined to ,~A~ have a sianificant adverse impact on che environmPnt. An EIS is ~f' required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was rnade after review by the County of a com- pleted environmental checklist and other information oii file with the lead agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declar•ation: Final Declaration: Name Ie yame ~ p~,~ S i gnature " ,1]4S i anature Title Title Department Department _ '01F gtoo m Da te ~ Da te /,~/~,/~~-j.,~~!~~ ~ Oepartment Reference No. ~m % 8. For Oeclarations of Significance Only: Datz of Expected Oraft EIS Availability (determined by Responsible Official) Date of Issuance TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: a. 8rief description and iisting of those environrtsentai imoacts leading to such deciaration: b. Brief explanation-of what measures, if any, could be taken by the applicant to arevent or mitiyate tne environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of nons+gni`icance: . , . . • , t , . , , `"t ~~i . , , , , • • . • ' - ; i~: o- ~ ` : . . / - ' , .~...1~'~ • . No. 78 , . BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIUNERS OF SPUKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON . . . IN THE MATTER OF THE RECOMMENDATIUNS FROM ) • ' THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ) , . CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S AGENDA DATED ) RESOI~UTION JULY 28, 1978. ) . , . . . - WMEREAS, Tfie Board of County Coiiyiiissioners of Spokane County, pursuant ta 'the proyision,s of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620, shall upon receipt.of any recom- mended official-control or amendment thereto, at its next regular public meeting set the date for a public meetiny where it may, by ordinance, adopt or reject the offic-idl. control or amendment; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by Resolution- No. 78 1040 acknowledge receipt of the recorronendations from the Spokane County Planning ' Commission concerning its Agenda, dated July 28, 1978; and , WMEREAS, the Board of County Coiimissioners of Spokane County, did by said resolution set this lOth day of August to consider the recommendations of the Planning Comnission con- cerning its July 28, 1978 Agenda, a copy of said recommendations are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. , NOW, TMEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the Board of County Coniniissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that based upon the inforiiiation available to the Board and'the testimony at this rneeting, the following action was taken: _ A. l. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO APPLICA- TION REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS: The Board took no action on the proposed amendrnents, as they continued considera- tion of the matter until their next regular Hearing date of August 17. B 1. PE- 890-73 - PAINTED FIILI_S 5th AUDITION (Rev.) (proposed Painted Nills 3rd Add.) ZE- 26-73 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Reed Having received a corruiiunication in disagreernent with the Planning Comnission's reconmiendation for Appr al~f an Extensionf Time, with ded conditions; the Board set a date of . G:~=J/L~~~ at of said day tq ~ . further consider the i»a~tEr. C 2. PE-1204-78 - REVIUUS ADDITION - Keto (continued from June 30, 1978) , ZE- 94-78 - AGRICULTURAL TQ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ' The Board concurred wi th the Pl anni ny Conmii ss i on' s reconvnendati on to conti nue , this preliminary plat proposal to the Commission hearing of August 25, 1978.. 3. PE-1210-78 - FIELOS ADDITION TU OTIS ORCHARDS - Transwestern Realty ZE- 88-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDFNTIAL The Board concurred with the I'lanniny Comrnission's recoirinendation to deny the the reyuest for thi sr. rel iiiii nary p-I at appl i cati on , for the reason as stated i n the minutes of the Planniny Conmiission hear.'ing. , 4. PE-1179-78 - NORTMCRESI ADUITIUN - Wolfland . ZE- 44-78 - AGRICULTURAL TU SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL lhe Board concurred wi th the Pl ann i ng, Coutnii ssi on' s reconuiiendati on to conti nue thi s pl at proposa l tio a spec i al niee C i ny on Septeinber 22, 1978. v - ~ ~ I ~ + • c ' ~ ✓ i • ,t . • ;li . . . D 5. PE-1211-78 - LES - RST ADDIT ON - Teeter ' ' ZE- 91-78 - ICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN The Board concurred wi th the Pl anni ny Conuni ss ion' s recoiunendation to approve. the preliniinary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the P1 anrii ng Coiiviii ss i on' s heari ng wi th cons i derati on of the envi ronmental revi,ew.. . The Board also concurred with the Planning Conunission's recqminendation to zone the property to the Agricultural Suburban zone classification upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map, pending,, the filing of the final plat. • 6. PE-1212-78 - BLUE SKIES - Schmitt (no zone change requested) :Having received a coninunication in disagreement with t• Planning j mmiss' n45 recoiiinendation for denial, the Board 'set a date of ~ , at j rvo~~ of said day to further consider th matter. . , 7. PE-1213-78 - SYKE'S kEPLAT TO ANCHOR SECURITIES - Sykes ' ZE- 107-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Corrmission's hearing with Gonsideration of the environmental rewiew.. .,.The Board also concurred with the Planning Comnission's recommendation to zone the property to the Single Faiiiily Residential zone classification upon the,filing of ' the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending'the- filing of the final plat. 8. PE-1214-78 - MAKTINSON'S ADUITION TO EAST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS - Martinsan ZE- 106-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Cornrnission's recomrriendation to approye the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes.of the Planning Conunissions's hearing with cansideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recpnynendation to zone the property to the Single Family Residential zone classifi'cation upon the fi~ling of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolut-ion and map pending the filing of the final plat. 9. PE-1215-78 - NEIMAN'S ADDITOON - Crick & Associates ZE- 108-78 - AGRICULTURaL 1"0 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred wi th ttie Pl anni ng Corru»i ssi on' s recoirmendati on to approve the prel iiiiinary plat, subject to tlie conditions as containe.d in the minutes of the Planniny Comnission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Planning Cominission's recommendatipn to zone the property to the Single Faiiiily Residential zone cla$sification upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and inap pend,iny the filiny of the final plat. , BE [T FURtNER RESOLVED that the Board hereby authorizes its chainnan to sign Final Declarations of Non-Siynificance for each item approved above, subject to compliance with the Spokane County Enviroiunental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15.340. QY ThIE ORDER OF 7HE BOAlZO TI-I ( S _/lr' DAY 0F 1978. - ~ BOAkD OF COI+NTY COMMISSIUNERS ' OF SPUKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~HARRY M. LARhED, CNM. RAY W. CNRISTENSEN J1I TESY : VEItNQtv W. OfILANU C l e r k u f t he Qoa rd rERRY -C. ~OPFT, ► i y _4,. ~ Uuputy . ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 July 31, 1978 Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House - Spokane, WA. 99260 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, July 28, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 12:10 P.M. reconvening at 1:30 P.M. to 3:50 P.M., in the Broadway Centre Building, the enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, and the Messrs. Culler, Kennedy, Main, Quigley and Thomas. Planning staff present: Hubbard, Frankovic, Litt, Johnson, Davis, Wesche and Blanchard. Engineer's Office: Kennaly. Health District: Prather. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio. Sincerely, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ~yJ c~ Ted cCoury, Chairman . Fred. L. Day rsh, Pla. i-ng Director McC/D/myb ` Official minutes and record of action taken by•the Spokane County Planning Commission at their regular hearing held on July 28, 1978. M / ~ PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING MINUTES July 28, 1978 12:10 P.M. - Luncheon Meetin g Topics of discussion included: Hearing Examiner Procedures Speaker system in hearing room Findings and Order 1:30 P.M. - Hearing reconvened D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 5. PE-1211-78, LESLYE FIRST ADDITION by Teeter, and ZE- 91-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary plat request be APPROVED, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings dated July 28, 1978, as the Planning Commission findings of fact (with a correction to PE-1211-78 Findings on page 5B -Impact Discussion-paragraph a- should read'bight lots on 2.3 acres"). (Motion to approve by Thomas, seconded by Main. Vote was unanimous in favor.) 6. PE 1212-78, BLUE SKIES by Schmitt (no change requested to present zoning which is Agricultural): That the preliminary plat request be DENIED. Dis- cussion among Commission members and opposing testimony included following remarks: larger lots, overcrawded schools, poor and unattractive plat design. (Motion to approve PE-1212-78 made by Quigley, seconded by Culler. Motion was lost with three "yes" votes, and four "no" votes.) 7. PE-1212-78, SYKE'S REPLAT TO ANCHOR SECURITIES by Sykes, and ZE- 107-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAh1ILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be APPROVED, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings dated July 28, 1978, as the Planning Commission findings of fact (with a cor- rection on page 7E in Item V- Conditions, that condition which refers to the public water system, should read "Consolidated Irrigation Distr. #19") (Motion to approve PE-1213-78 was made by Main, seconded by Thomas. Vote in favor of the motion was unanimous.) 8. PE-1214-78, MARTINSON'S ADDITION TO EAST FARt-1S IRRIGATED TRACTS by Martinson, ZE- 106-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be APPROVED, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings dated July 28, 1978, as the Planning Commission findings of fact. (Motion to approve PE-1214-78 by Cullers seconded by both Main & Quigley. Motion carried with six "yes" votes and one member abstaining from voting.) 9. PE-1215-78, NEIMAN'S ADDITION by Crick and-Associates, and ZE- 108-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be APPROVED, and in so approving adopts the Staff's Findings dated July 28, 1978, as the Planning Commission's findings of fact (with the cieletion on page 9F of the Findings which relates to roads - which should read "all roads...be curbed and paved", striking the word "or") -5- r PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING MINUTES July 28, 1978 D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 9. PE-1215-78, NEIMAN'S ADDITION - continued from previous page. (MotT~ ,on to approve PE-1215-78 was made by Main, seconded by Thomas. Motion to approve carried with six "yes" votes and one "no".) 3:50 P.M. MEETING-ADJOURNED. DATED THIS 31st DAY OF JULY;,1978. By: Chris Wesche Myrth Blanchard Recording Secretaries For: Ted McCoury, Chairman Planning Commission Fred L. Dayharsh, Director Spokane County Planning Department -6- . . , ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ~1/- 79 ~ OR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ;t!,~ ~ ACTION TAKEN 1,~779 APPROVE DENY CONTINUE LIIVGTH OF CONTINUANCE ~ REASONS 1. 2. 3. 4. CONDTIONS Subject Lo the Conditions as contained in the Planning Staff's Findings, Dated , and subject to the additional conditions that 1. 2. 3. VOTE Motion by ~ - Seconded by - VOTE . YES NO • . STAFF FMDINCCE - july 28, 1978 PE-1 211-7 8-L2,c1yP F i_rs t Addition ZT- 91 -7 R- Aaricul tural to AQricultural Suburban PRELIMTNARY SUBDIVISION ALTD ZONE REC;LASSIFICATION I , GEIVERAL INFORMATION: A. Location -On both sides of Heroy, east of McDonald Road, and south of Wellesley directly behind the Trentwood Grange. B , Proposal - 2.3 acres subdivided into 8 lots for single family use. -Typical lot frontage = 75' to 100' -Typical lot size = 10,000 sq.ft, - Lots per gross acre = 3.48 , C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan -Approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this area, with no density designation, -Approved Comorehensive Plan map designates all nearby surrounding lands for residential use. D . Existing Land Uses -Immedfately to the east of the site are Green Orchard and Vandever Subdivisions with densities about the same or slightly less than the proposed plat. -To the south are some larger parcels in pasLure or minimal agriculture with residential subdivisions and commercial uses occurring further south along Trent Avenue. -Adjacent to the proposed plat on rhe west is Clark's Subdivision with approximately 10, 000 sq, ft , lots. Further west across McDonald Road to the River, land use consists of agriculture, pasture, timberlands and open space. -There are acre parcels and less density to the north and across Wellesley is active agriculture with large segregations of 1/2 acre to 10 acres. E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses -The proposed plat is compatible with existing land uses in the immediate vicinity of the site and appears consistent with development trends south of Wellesley. - SA - (cont d . ) FINDING - july 28, 1978 Leslye First Addition II. SPECIAL INFORMATION: A. Circulation -The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and finds the roads within the plat to be basically acceptable. B. Sewage Disposal -The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage disposal means, including sewage treatment package plant, sealed lagoon system and individual septic tank disposal. In this regard he noted the advantages and disadvantages of each and felt the most feasible method was individual on-site septic tanks and drainfields. -The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systerm for each lot within the plat. The District states that an on-site sewage management system should be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 9 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible impact on ground- water quality from this proposal have the following comments: Impa ct Discussion a. The plat sponsor has proposed 18 lots on 2.3 acres with a typical lot size of 80 by 125 feet, Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: 1. In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. HoLVever, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots", will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents . SB - (contd. ) . FTNDINCS ; july 28, 1978 Le°slye First Addition II. Impact Discussion (contd. ) The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow Iine indicate that the maximum range of (dfssolved) solids concentration expected at preserit (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast Year 2020 maximum , incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background, The analytical results of the forecast impact of Year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both me-asured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level, c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 3, 0 to 5.3 ppm. A vrojected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges of 3, 3 ppm, to 5.8 ppm, Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm, d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics: 1. Collector and central treatment sysrems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are nor currently economically available for this project. Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Thesz systems require more land area than a converdrnal subsurface cirainfield, Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance, C. Drainage -The County Utilities Engineer refers that the preliminary storm drainage submittal from the applicant indicates the on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water rur.off. , However, final construction plans should be reviewed and approved prior to the final pla t f iling . D. Wa ter Supply -Prnposal is located within recorded service area of rrentwood Irrigation District --',Lr3. -This District advises that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic and fire uses. . - SC - (contd.) . ! FINDINGS - july 28, 1978 Leslye First Addition II, E. F ire Protection - Proposal is situated within recorded service area of District #1 . - Mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection should be required as a condition of final plat approval; as determined by the Fire District staff. F , Schools . -Proposal lies within the boundaries of the East Valley School District. -The District indicates they are at capacity levels and continued bond issues are required to meet the growing student population, G. Parks -The report, "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976), states that a neighborhood park is planned adjacent to the proposed elementary school site north of Wellesley and west of McDonald. The Plante's Ferry site has been designated a special use park adjacent to the S pokane River approxima tely 3/4 mile s we s t of the propo sed pla t. H , Unique Environmental Features - None have been identified in the County Inventory. I. Cultural Resources - The project site lies in an area that has some archaeological significance as determined by National Heritage, Inc, in their study document. III, ZONING ANALYSIS : Pending approval of the preliminary and final plat as proposed, it would be appropriate to reclassify the zoning to Agricultural Suburban, as dictated by lot size and frontage. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: -Environmental checklist submitted by the sponsor has been reviewed, and no significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. -Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklist in the following categories: earth; air, water; flora; noise, light and glare; land use; natural resources; population; housing; transportation/ circulation; public services, energy and utilities. -The Planning Director issued a proposed De~claration of Non-Significance and it was circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction, - - S D - (contd. ) • Y' ' ~ ^ . O FINDINGS - July 28, 1978 Leslye First Addition V. CONDITIONS: -If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended. -Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced in the supplemental sheet entitled, "Standard Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats", August, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department. N o t e: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed hereafter, -P-11 P-2, P-3, P-5, P-6, P-7, P-8, P-9 ,(Augus t 1, 1979), P-13. -E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6 -A-1 -H-1 -That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C,080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioners' Resolution No, 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department staff. -That a public water system, serviced by Irrigation District #3, including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. -That an on-site sewage management be created and approved by the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of 9 dwelling units are authorized within the plat, -That the Planning Commission sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance and recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non-Significance. . -That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer. -That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Agricultural Suburban. -That the project sponsor may not be notified by the Planning Dm-partment of the need to request an extension of time for the renewal of any preliminary plat approval granted by the Board of County Commissioners. -That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. -5E- AGENDA, July 28, 1978 Telephone: 456 2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNI P;G COMMI SS IOPd Time: Friday, July 28, 1978 - 8:30 A.M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor West 1201 Broadway, Spokane (Address also known as N. 721 Jefferson) 8:30 A.M. A. 1. Planning Commission Concerns 2. Report on Commissioners' Actions " 3. Other Business Page B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIME l. PE- 890-73, PAIPdTED HILLS 5th ADDITION (Revised) . (formerly Painted Hills 3rd Addition) ZE- 26-73, AGRICULTURAL to SIPJGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL REED 1 C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 2. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION (continued from June 30, 1978 Hearing) ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL KETO 2 3. PE-1210-78, FIELDS ADDITIOPJ TO OTIS ORCHARDS (cont'd from June 30 Hearing) ZE- 88-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRAfVSWESTERN REALTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION ZE- 44-78, AGRICULTUP.AL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL IrJOLFLAND, INC 4 12:00 Noon Lunch (Place to be announced at hearing) 1:30 P.M. D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIOPdS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOfJS . 5. PE-1211-78, LESLYE FIRST ADDITION ZE- 91-78, AGRICULTURAL tc AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TEETER 5 6. PE-1212-78, BLUE SKIES AGRICULTURAL - no change SCHMITT 6 7. PE-1213-78, SYKE'S REPLAT TO ANCHOR SECURITIES ZE- 107-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SYKES 7 -over- O'~ fz tl • AGENDA, July 28, 1978 TELEPHONE NO: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: July 28, 1978 (Friday) 1:30 P.M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor West 1201 Sroadway, Spokane (also known as N. 721 Jefferson) PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APJD ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 5. PE-1211-78, LESLYE FIRST ADDITION ZE- 91-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN a. Locati on : Secti on 3, Townshi p 25N, Range 44, E.W. M. The South 1/2 of Tract 41 of Trentwood Orchards,as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, on page 16; Situate in Spokane County, Washington. . b. Sponsor: P.andy Teeter N. 109 University Road Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Surveyor: Lawrence L. Leinweber E. 12929 Sprague, "D" Spokane, WA. 99216 d. Site Size: 2.3 acres e. Number of lots: 8 lots f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 j. School District: East Valley #361 k. Method of Sewage Disposal Individual on-site systens 1. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. "~i: FT",ie ~:e u: IS 7Z r • . :.J.~-.i .s c s~ ir m e• co._ _i~ i I I , . ~a. ; N ~J ~ ' T ; - -c~ - - - ; - - - , - - - - - ; .,.e. ~:y tc :c• ~ . . - 0 ; , I a'' , . ~ i~: • 'ti , j4 ~ i a y r , Eot losf ~i i{ volieY Voll*y j ' ✓ o , t i j t ye tin iqh 9~w~..,y:' e: i. 61 i. j J ! Tlcnr~.onn e 5:~C71 ~ M vf 4vwL. i. 2 4t1~~~'T~;t jhMILG ~ Pprrr ~ `:.i . ..cC..O. . ~i, .V~ . Fo.4 0 j P . . a t-. i~ _d e ~ . W . l s i f r .r r) a . _ ~ j : • n Ec ?^.~n . . : ° :.I ' ~J, I S r ~ ~r `J~~ 1 :.t'J • t ~ • -.r , ,.T• 1.. . • = - _ J` _ _ ~ , J'-~~i( Y ~ _ " _ _ . _ _ _ l t .I . . ~ ` i . ' r 1 .9 ' U:'' ~ l tiVJ`:' " ~ SPOt lNDUS: ~ wci-o 1•.c . 5 ~ ~ .1 AGENC:Y RESPONSE FORM laArI'E : 7 f -76 1 o, ~ 3 l FKuM: Name: 7- Title: s L1 p . Agency : r~ rN ~r ~ r SUBJECT: Lead Agency: ~ , ~A 4pPlicant : ` ~--/S ✓ c~ ~v~'si"n~ Project: L..e. 7"~i~'v~ X/,oJ'`s / ~ I HAVE REVIEWED THE ANi ;nv.Ck. List, Prop.-Final-Dec. of Signif. oT Non Signif., UEIS QUALITY ,Jp Review For Approval Required Septic tank W/17,500 G.P.D. or SO or more services Mechanical system or lagoon W/3500 G.P.D. or 10 or more serviccs. 3. Commercial or industrial facility. 4. NPDES Permit required D. State Permit required B. L.I.S. Preparation Requested C. G.W.I. Preparation RequeSted 11. Enviroiimcntal Checklist Kr(I1WtitCci L•: . Water Qual ity Standards Modif icat i un heCjll 1 Ct-d :'lpplicant To Be Notified F. No Comment On No Ob j ec t ion 'i'o_ .V g G, Q F 1.1 EI. Dcta i led ('cIrrtm~lnC_~ r1t t:,icliec3 A[I; 0(_IAI_I'1'Y (In (;uunties ut `lurisdictio~ri) A. Notice of Construction Require.i B. Burning Permit Rc•(,u i z-cti C. f?i•t'111ed Cutrtmwnt:-~ 1tt.;tchcd ';OIJF St)L'i:i'E A. ~ Project Within Aquifer (Kecl-targc Zune) B.309(EPA Review Appears Necessary Pro ject Within Streamf l ow Zonc.~ ~ . - PREPARED B • ` T ITI.F. ~ PE-1211-78 & ZE-93-78 In the Matter of a Hearing to consider the application of Randy Teeter, N. 109 University Road, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as Leslye First Addition. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Single Family Residential on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat or plats of such property. The property being platted is described as: Section 3, Township 25N, Range 44 E.4J.M., The S 112 of Tract 41 of Trentwood Orchard; as per plat thereof recorded in Vol. "M" of Plats, on page 16; situate in Spokane County, Washington. (On Heroy Avenue in the Spokane Valley between McDonald Road and Evergreen Road.) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ~ ~,4-4"3 ~~Q 1- beinq first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a cttizen of the United States of Amerlca, and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the iq day of v L_ L-( , 19 72~ , I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of ~ he hereto attached and tncorporated hereln by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ln a consplcuous manner at each of the following locations., to-w[t: 1• ~1 . ~ / V w C G~'~-'~- ~ r~ 1/~.►,f A1 , ~ 2. 40 -24- 4Z~51,") s~--!' 3 IS Gc ~ a a_~~ G~ DA TE D THI S / l DAY O F , 19 ZI-i . . V SIGNE Subscribed and Sworn to before me this ~ day of , 192,1" , - I' / LIJ Notary Public in and for the State of Washtngton, restd!-ng at Spokane, Washingto; j~( ~ ~ ~ t'+~ 1'lt~tlfl~~~► ~~"1C~~ +C~I"1 i ~ ~at th~ hc~ur c~f ~~r i~ C~vnf~ren~ce R~~~ ~4, ~a~l~r~ Arr~nu~e ~r~- o~C+~ne ~vunt~► ~c~~rt H~v►u~~ ~#~nne~, ~p+~kan~, n, Th~ ~PC~'~~A~E ~C~L~~TY PLA~~~~l~ ~~AAMI~-~ ' +c~ndu~t a ~u~li~ h~~ri~g e~+~r~i~tic~~n of ~rr~~: _ ' ~U~~HER DETAIL~ ~c~n~~~t th~ ~~akan~ ~~un~yr e~~~trr~e~t, ~'ubri~ '~+~rks E~uilding, N. ~311 ~I+~~'f~rs~n ~cane, 11~ash~ngt~ar~. Dire~#~r ~f ~'1~nni~g ~pokan+~ Co~+rrty Rlanning fi~e,~arttt~nt I . . ~ a.F.,V LAND FILE POLL. CARDS,, _ IMQUM= HZ , - - - = PI30Nf' Z2 ~ DATZ CH ARGE~9-: ~ 7-/O-/g . PB+OJ= +t COGE SEC. T. R. 0, BLK.-lOT K ~3 - • L 4 S o 7 3 10 y ~0 9 L1 7 ' 6 : - ~ 691 •!So g' ; •7 - O af . , ` ~E . . • , ✓ Kevrunch inatru,ctf ons . a3 1 A Charge to : Cq n,1.0~' col. 1 is a quota mark (numeric "H" ) . - - - - cols. 2 - 4 is constant - "691",- c ol3. 5- 13 ie nmeric.. ui th_ blanks _accs p.table Do nct zero Pill'. . ~ , col. 1-4 13 a quote IDark (numeric "'H";Y. !~3 6 9 1 ' o ' Identi fy and separate batches- for computer room. • This job must be completed no 1-ater than two (2) 0 daYs after receipt. - - h ~ t i - OA - 4 a SI y~ Forward data to the computer room for processi ng. ~ ~ 3 O s v~ Return these sheets to the Planning Department . _ ' upon comp letion o f Keypunc hing; a t ten tion o f: l Pl at Secti on/Zoni ng Secti on/Zoni ng Adj uster. ' cc 9i3, t ~ • _~r ~ r., 4 t•~~ , - . . - Parcel rYU,abera 32541-0800 tt~ru 3254.t-A09 ~ S L! ' 3. 2 ~ S, 4►1 8,, ~ Parcei 3254I-0800 thru. 32541'089g MM* ME I/4 0f aec. 32, tvp• 25, rgs. 44 AlI of aec. 32, txP. 25, rge. 44 4' wll oP txp. 25, rge. 44 - ,1 9 .1 t~, (I I 1 - _ ' - C,~/ A11 oF rge. 4•~ . ~ 1 Sectlona vithin _ 6 TovnehivAarwe . , ~ 9: O '.J. 06 I 05 ( 04 02 Ol I . ~ 07 ~ 104110,I3 121 ~ 18 171i6115111.f131 o I_i~ IE9t28 ol2i!222 iu 127 b 2 31 32 ~ 6 _ 9 1 1 1 Ci - ~ 4LO L~ 6 , 69 1-~/o o / ~1 Qlarter aactions b 9 ► -~o o ~ ` within asctfoo 003 1 ' ~ _ /8= ~ 3 4 ' (p 0 r 4 1 ~ G414 ~ j~ ~y f 1~ r T 4 ` f y ~j~p , _ ~Il~ 17u ~"~G~'~ ~M1 4' ~y ~ C P 1. V ~ 4~ K L 1' ~ L ~ ~ L A ~ ~ ~LL 1 1LJ ~~~G! _ ~KAN ONY~'A N ~ ~ E ~ li ~ t ~A ~ F ~l~ , ~ ~ ;pA~Ct~. ►~~7CU~~~~ ~ ~ _ ~ - - r Nu~~E~c ~UI~~~~ A~S~SSt~ ~4~~~~ LtGAL ~ESCR~PTI~N ~F PROPk~t'~ . T~1l~PA'~ER ~ ~ , ~541~~ llt~l 146d~~t~ T~ G~ R N . A _ ~A ~ E T ~ ~ T~rQ ~l ~H 841 ~ tRENT#~0~~ G~tAM~~E 145~ ~ - ~ o' t iN~ES A~fRE~ ~ ~i ~ ~ 1~~~~ EM~I~R~ ~IA~' P ~ ~KAN~ wA '49~Ob q~ ~ , ~0354~-1~~C ~'~G71~f,3f~"~ ~G J ~SIEK ~'~t~~t~~r~7~1~ ~k~H ~I~~a~ 5~~ M~~ _w - ~~~`o~f ~ll~i@.73~ ~1~ YR 4~1 ~ ~it"17,4b~ N'J~+~.4~' 5J fi~ 4i~ ~XC ~6~~3C~' ~~il"~i41 ~ ~9~.~~ . , i~ 9~ ' P~ k ~ . ►~354~-~~~~ 6~ 1 G L~ ,~t~ t tT T~~NT w00D ~R~C H E 1~~. T3FT 5f'~ ni~G ~C. _ - - _ _ ro ~ r~F w~~l~'.4bF~ ~~Gv~T ~k ~u v#~15~~1 . M ' 9~'7.0~. i u~~4~~~1~t1 b~4198C C t~ ,JCANtr~CT T~Cii~~r~1~D ~~t~H ~1~G9~85' 11~~E~A~IG~~ LY1V~4 A'"~ } _ _ ~ ~~r~ 'F~"~ 0F 'f~ ~t ~r~C Mf~I7.4~ 1~E lE ~ 1~ V~ ! ~ ~~4~~ L S ~ A ~ S~IIK~t~~E #~A 992~+~ . ~ e ~ - 9 ~ 7 hJ 0~] ~t , J3 4~ w 11 v~77~ 5TE4'E E hEI~M iK~ Tw t~ 0 CHAk~75 w,~,~u~T R~I~IH~iT~N HA~OI~ A r M1 . l4~05' ►'V1~~~~' 3~ ~E Y - ~ 1~51c ~i 1~~5L~ AVE ~ a~ 9q~ S~'i~h~dN~ IrA 99t1+b ~ ~ _ 5~i - f~'~ 5 7~0 i E V- Hi ~ M t~ ~ ~ ~ ~3 ~ ~2 I ~ ~ ~ ~ T~c~ ZwO~~ Q ~HA ~GS ~~~II~~Gt~N HA~~I~D A ~ w 4" F~~~ M~[~9 5 F T~F ~l~( 3~ ~~tC ~l~~ ~ 0' DF TN ~ 2 1.~rb 8 1~D E N~~~ ~ 13~Y~ ~E~~ESIEI! AVE - K ~Pn AH~ ~IA ~9~ZlE~ ~o c~y`' ~~~~1~"~~~~ ~5~~~r'~~~ f1~4~~~~~ i~~Jk~l~~~ ~t~d~~~'i ~~4~ ~L~ ~~1~ ~1~1 . _ y ~ ~ ~ - +~~~i ~ ~35~1-~~~t~l 750~~,~7G~~~ C ~KINI~~~i Gii~~N ~l+~C~! ~U~ ~1 5~~~!~(~~~ ~ RU~~E' ~3 ~ - 1+~ 30~ 73 ~ ~~i~ _ 1~' ~ tA1~~ ~~5~1 3~4~ ~k~54~~ K~~CH~~,~ L ~wr~ ~r~E~E~i ~RGH ytJ~ L1 ~1 ~D~ ~~C PA~ MTG - G ~ 1~* 13 1'1~ ~1F»~ ~ ~ ~1A ~1 ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ , ~a . ~ 5 _ ,~~}U' ~,~i` ~ ~ ow , _ . r~ ~ ~13~~4,~ 37~i~ 7~*~~►~,~x9~~ Eii~dA~l~~' Y~ t~ 1~AN,~~ ~1~+~ SU~ L9 8# t~'~~ S~C ~A ~ C ~ - e p1R . ~ ~I~ ~ ~ - d~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~512 k Y~ ~ ~~~~1-~t~q4 77G~14~4 I~EN W p~~►~~~~1 N" 'V R L~ , YA ~ SU~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~~I~~~IU~~ ~ f~ r~ ~ ~ 1b~~3 w ~~~~1~ 44_~1 7b~b~8L~~91 ~c Ifih~ N,t f~I~1 ~iR~,~N ~RCH 5 ~J~ ~L 1 ~3 '~P(~ ~T+G~- ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~~U T~ 3~I ~ ~ ~ , , ~ 43541-4~'~Z 6~8f~9b~ ~~ih1~.L+~ir~ G~ktN ~~~H SIJ~ 1~ 83 _ _ ~~I~~I i~~'G l~~~ ~ ~~2~995 ~ ~35~~-4~u3 5~41~1G ,If]A~I~I M ~1~P~~i~ ~GK~eN ~RCH ~UB 83 C~iMI~ T _ . ~ G - . . - / ~~8~~7 ~ ~ ~~~#l~~~u4 5~~7~~4~~ ~H ~{G C~~~:~~A~ Gr~t~~ ~~GH SUB l~ ~3 ~,~1 , C~~4~1 M~G l ~ x z~ ~~u L~~.~41~'~~~4 I:u~4tJ$1 J E,~~LL~" ~ ~`rtcN~I~G ~i~CM ~T p~ f~4B S~1,L~~S JAf~~~ ; ~ ~ - ~ E%C ~Ei3~~1 ~F 515,~fT~EI~C Wt~S~~ 5i~i~FT ~ i~~5~3 RICH A'~~E ~ I~ 49 . S G AHE ~A ~lb ~ • ~ ~ ~~541~~7~►1 ~3~~~3G ~7~IRQ~F~~' ~H~t~~f~ ~Trt~N~~~ C~~C~i B~$~4~lETT~ .JANiC~ ~I ~ ~ 13~+G ~ RICH A V~ ~ , ~~~~c~~~,.._ . _ ~ , - - - _ _ J i tl 03541~~6~~ 7~rill~~~~~r LEl~~~l 9 C~EF~R'~ T+iE+r'iw1~ 4~~~H ~~C w~~}~F~ C~IE~RY ~ B , ~t V ~~b F k~3~~ ~I~C#~ ~ - SPflltAN~ A 99 d ~ ~t ~ 1 ~ ~ €~354~-IbU3 3~~i~i~6B H P dltSSi ~r~~N1~D ~~C~ E7~UFT ~F 81~~5ING HAk~I~ P y ~ _ F 4b ~ ~~3~~ ~I~~ AV~ - W2~,~ T B , 5#~~iLAN~ ~IA 99~ 1G _ - - ~ ~ ' G ~iE x ~ OR ii 1~3FT B~b B+LESS~ I~G iiAR~l~ . ~~~4~~~a0t 6~3~~ ~ P~~Eaa~f~ T~V ~ C W ~ 5 ~ ~ V 133~ tC ~ SF~KAN~ ~A 99~~~ - r~ ~35~1-15~1 ~~3381~, ~a A~~SS►~tk ~kt~TwR ORCH P~ 0~ ~~5 #~A~S~N~R RE~I~H~~.~ A F"N F~~ ' FT 0~ w1~16iFT' ~F EZSb~ T ~ 132~3 RI~~# AV~ ~x~ 5~3t~a 15~ T ~3J~ S ~ ~~tA ~ ~ i~A '4 421 b . . , -l~ 3 73u~~e ~63 c1~1t~ h~I~1 r~' ~`~~~TwD ~RCN i~~'~~~' ~F A~18~~If JI~~~E~H ~ ~ ~15+41 ~ p ~o - _ - - . S~~iuF~ ~4~ ~ 5b.~~ CG~~~~C~ AVE ~~~~AN~ ~IA 9QZ~~ , rt ~ , - A IVt~ ~i ~ ~35~i1-~5~4 63~3B1C k A ItA~~NE~ ~RE~T1~a QkCW ~150F'~ ~F K,~'~t~~R R~T 0~ A~,/ R H AV 53~,~~'~ 8~45 ~ ~~~1~ IC ~ r rt~ ~ ~ ~ Sf~A~~A '9~1~ ~ _ - U. ~ ~ R4i ~41~~1 ~1~ ~ " i~~I4 ~~~~f~~ Q~5~~i1~14~5 ~o7~~bC ~'R~~~'~Cl~~ 1 3 ~a C 3~D ~ ~r ~i ~c F , OF~ ~G!~5T K~ - - - - - - . 4 54 - 4 ~ 7 b~ 3' F~~GE ~C~ i~'T ~1~ TR~iV~' ~i~~l~ O~R+CH H~G~ ~3 1 1 D1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~.A~1~~ S~~ ~ ~ B~ , ~3~41-~1Q~ T~07~~~~31 H~G~ P~ ~iF T~E~rTi~~~~ ~RC~I H~GL~ - ~ ~ , C~ ~tKa SU Bi - ~ . ~~54~-a~~i 7a0~1~49~5 J ~r ~IC !c~0~v a~t~ ~ P~ ~F TR~~"~wG~~ ~RCh~ ~QUi"fAB~.r~ 5~ ~GLt~~tl~5 SU4 L 1~~ ~CS~ 5~70 1 ~ ~~~~~i~~~~ ~~Y~~YY~~~ '~1~1/~ ~f ~~~I~~~fi~~ ~~~6~ l.~~~ ' ~35~1~~4~u3 7~~,7~6~p~~1 H~G~ C~ ~T I'~E~"i~G~7D l~r~C1f ~~G~ aKK - SU~ ~ C~ ~ U35~l~43~4 1~~~7~~fi►33~ NE~~ C~ ,~F TREN~+~O~~ ~I~,~H H~G~ ~~A~~~ 5~6 L4 t~3541-~ZOi ?b~,7'2bu3~,~ GO PT 3F ~R~~T~Q~~ (~~~CH H~G+~ ~I~,~wtK~ ~1 B~ s _ ~ ~~~~~-~+Ci~Z +~~~~~74#~6 ~cuib~kT H ~~~a ~~S P~ ~F TREhT~I~I~D ~RCH ~I~ MI~T S~M ~K ~;~.Ar~~(~ SUS ~Z ~ 35 ~r946 ~ - - 435~i1-4~~3 79~~#~8Z~~4 W~~~G ~R, ~t i~F t~EP~T~~7~~ ~R~~I ~ANCSHA~~~ I~~G ~ ~3 CLG~~KS 51J~ L3 B,~ ~'26~r~ ~ 54 ~~6~ 7ZbQ3~ 1 hE~r~ PI U F T~tEI~~` ~1Gc~~~ [~RC H ~~G~ i ~~A~i~~S 5U~ L~ 8Z #~~54~-4~~~ 7GU7~~~33~ H~~~ C~ PT i3~F T~t~N~`~I~~~ ~~CH HEG~ _ ~ C~NRKS S~~ ~.5 8~ ~~5~41-1~45 ~'bi151~b~3(~5 ~+~LA ~u11,~tr~~~t ~'~s~1ti~W~~~ 17~~Ji ~A~~E~IG~R ~ 8 r ~'TN TR 4~ L~'G ~ l,t~ ~R+V FR~~i ~N ~ l~l Su 'iR 156.~~F~ ~ _ s_ ~ - ~~F N~ R T+~ PT ~ lN c~F ~R 1~5.9~,~ T E~~ ~rr C~~ Ex~ P~ItAlw~ r~~ 4~215 ~ ~ ~ ~32F ; ~ ~ . S T ~~~~:-.iuy ~c~,3~:~~::~~ ~,~~L~~wr~,~M Tr~:~~~Tw~ii~G ~r~~~i Tn~ c7~~, 6,~L~,~~Vli~t~ G ~ 7~ 3 F T 4 0~i 5 4 ~ ~ S ~ 22 PO~~ ~ ~l ~ , ~I ~f~ 9~ 1 , _ . 65917 H' - A" Ma ~ RR TR5 P 4 F~I~~S EL V'f ~ l~ , 3~i644 ~914 77~►+~1 VT~TO~ ~USSt~.~L ~Wc ~~c L ~ I~ 0 . ~I135' aF r3t~~' 514~~ D~ BlK 11~ t 1~~~~ w~~I~~SL~~f ~4 a ~ ~~o~c~r~+~ ~A ~ ~~~~r~i~~~ ~ ~~~►~r~a~~bi ~ ~~~~r~ w ~~~~s I~i~ z,~ ~ ~ ~~~r ~~~N ~ ~ SZ~~+~~ OF E~Z7F~' 81~8 13~19 ~fl1.~Sl~'~ AVE SPC~K~M~~ YA ~99~~~ 346~r4~v8~i4 ~95bi~~~A ~ I T~1P~E.` W~aic~l Ii~k RL 4 w1~'2 pr~a Rk~~R~ ~U~P~~ Gc~TRU~~ I ~uG ~S~IC 8t17 ~ 11~t~9 4~LL~Sl~~1 A1fE SP~I~~►~1~ I~A 9~121b . 5 ~ ~ i . . , ~A+~ ~I~ ;~..~K . ~ ~ . ~ i.f ~ . ~uM~ARr qArA• ~h~~u~ Gan~S Pa,~~,~~5 ~Rt~T ~.~~l~s li#~ S5 4tii 4u 99 .4~~~t~ .4833 ~9. ~{~~4(~ ~ r . y,Mr ky . Y r w u c L u r ~ c ~ i~s n ~ r - - ~ 1 ~ ~ . , ~ I ~ - - e i _ _ - - - - ~ - . ~ • Y 5POKANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTIAENT ~~~e&w ~,4 / EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE, • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPNONE (509) 928-1700 July 20, 1978 - Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Pl anni ng Di rector R ECEIVED Spokane County Planning Commission - JUL 2 0 1978 North 811 Jefferson ~ Spokane, tJashington 99201 SPOKANE COUNTY- . Dea r h1r. . Dayh a rs h: PIANNING DEPARTMENT The following preliminary subdivisions and zone classification for upgrading has been revi ewed for fi re protection: PE-1204-78 Revious Addition ZE- 94-78 Agricultural to Single Family Residential KETO- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. PE-1210-78 Fields Addition to Otis Orchards ZE- 88-7E Agricultural to Single Family Residential Transwestern Realty- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area PE-1211-78 LeslyeFirst Addition ZE- 91-78 Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban 60~ Teeter- Mai ns and hydrants nq~ed tp `be i nstal 1 ed i n this area -PE-1212-78 Blue Skies Agricultural-no change - Schmitt- Mains and hydrants need tfl be installed in th i s area PE-1213-78 Syke's Replat to Anchor Securities . ZE-107-78 Agricultural to Single Family Residential Sykes- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area PE-1214-78 Martinsons Addition ZE- 106-78 Agricultural to Single Family Residential Martinson-Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area - I8 ~ 1 PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI VES ~ OI ICE OF COUNTY EINANEEIR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date JuL-%4 Iater-offite Communicatian Te PLANNI NG COM4tI S S I ON f " GAAY KENNALY, PLANNING & TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER Svb~wt ROgD CONDITIONS # 0 r LF ~~t~lD . *CONDITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UrdDER CONSIDERATION . , that conditional approval of the plat is given eubject to dedication of Right of Ltay to the pu5lic and approval of the road systea in the plat by the County 8ngiaear; E 2 that plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed s[reet centerline aad curb grades be submitted to [he County Engineer for approval prior to constructioa aad the filiag of a final plar; . E 3 that drainage plan9 aad design calculations ehoWing the grade9 and aligr=ent of draia-- age facilities be submitted to the Couaty Engineer for approval prior to constmetfon an3 the filing of a fiaal plat; . 4 constructfon within the proposed public streets and easements ahall ba perfasmed under tha direct supervi9ion of a licensed land surveyor, who shall be reaponsible foY perpetuatiag all evidence of ths locatfon of survey cnonuments which piay be disturbed during construction and who shall furnish thz Coun[y Engineer w3.th "As .Built" plaas and a certificate in Writing that all improveraents weYS iastslled to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans aztd that all. distuxbed monu:nznCs have been replaced; . E 5 no construcCion work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way until a gerrnit has been issuad by the County cngineer. All Work is subjeCt to inspecti.oa and apprnvaZ by the County En31naer; b all construction within the Public Right of Nay is to be comple[ed prior to filing thE f f nal plat or a bond in tha amount es tim.ated by the County Engineer to cover the eost oi constructfon of improv2ments, construction certification, "As Built" plaas, and monurnsnting the street centerlines shall be filed with rhe County Engi :zer. E 7-no direct acceas from lots to 1/2 righit of ways until auch time ae edditional right of waye are dediceted and roads are established as County R,oads. . E 8-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roede are construc[ed Co County S[andarde and es[ablished as County Roeds. . E 9-road dQSign, #Moo §M~ congtruction, and drainage con[rol for 1/2 righta oE ways end Stub Road connections are the responaibility of the Developer. E 10-that the Sponsor shell prepare and aubmir to the Coun[y Engineer e design proposel eccept- able to the State Hi.ghway Department of the proposed S[ate Highwey-County Road inter- aection. State Highway Departmen[ approvel of the pcopoaed design must be received prior to the filing af the final plat. Improvemente to the State Nighway are to be the reepon- sibility of the Sponsor and mey either he congtructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvecaenta furniehed [o the County Engineer in the emount ae determined by the County Engineer*end the State Highwey Department. (E 15~that all roads within the plat be curbed andoM paved to the specifications of the County EYigineer. ~ tiz ~4J~~j"` • y • •/i4.-•_'~..f..C`4_MiTNM1W11 % N \~1 PLANNI NG DEPARTMENT i ~ , . PUBLIC WORKS BUILOING N. 911 JEFFERSON STREET ~ + 1 r PHONE 456-2274 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 9 60 9-2 " - . . . • r . , ~ 'n SPOKANE COUNTY GOVRT HOUSr M E M O R A N D U M To : CQ, 1~It7~c ~ ~~s7' T~?t~v~r•varo~ /R~?. b~s~. ~ DS 14 S Rn?u : r'7uv)R y69A.M Arrql,' TO P" ,"'vS TuS ~ DoF l R~ • o ~F., , ATrAJ : !?Hy5 STt , FROP+i: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 509-456-2274 Attenti on : UJALty NaRImb REFERENCE: Lead Agency Destination, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: P4&... - - J pq Ji - 762 - ZEsAyr- 4Fil?s7" ~t aiT7'o.~ ` This determination was made in accordance with 4JAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) ) or an AGEPdC'f WITH E;(PERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on D . Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest pportuni y, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for The subject proposal or action (IS, Pi■MV) LOCATED WITHIN THE SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER OR ITS WATERSHED. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GWIE), pursuant to the Environmental Protection Agency's Sole Source Designation or regulations pertaining to this designation, should be prepared. Enclosures e ' FILE ' •y ~ ' y~'' I . ; ~ I ~ ~ • - • • •6t"•~-.' . • . r •/1' V1 . ~ ' : ~ ~ ~~i.t.r i t~.► ~ . . :/J~,l/`~, yt ! ' ` : : ' . i j~~~..J' ' I ~;_I• 1 ' j • i ; ' ~ ; ~ , ' • I`.STgEF,.R.EVIEVIT OF ENVJR NMENTAL CHECKLIST i 5?f:KqNE COUMTY COUPT NOUSE I, In accordance with the Spokane County En.vironmental Ordinance and W.yC 197-10, an Environmental Cilecklist has been subrn~.tted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the _Tk14V,&/A1& l~tT107- . The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action (s) Requested: ✓ Zone Change; ~ Preliminary Plat Approval: •-oo"Finai Plat Approval; Change of Condition O ther: B. Description of Proposal :SvZDj 1/I s/DA) atC 3~~~~'3 /~tfTO F9 ~ C. Location of Proposal: AAub 6- t II. Revfew of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted undEr the fo11owing questions: (1) _I/Earth (8) -J-oo' Land U s e (15) A0000 Lnergy (2) Ll Air (9) 4,,*- Natural (16) AOO' Utilities Resources (3) ~ W3ter (10) _ Risk of (17) Human Upset Health (4) Flora (11) ✓ Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) POOO Housing (19) Rec, (6) ~ Noise (13) 4000'* Trans./ (20) Arc;h,/ Circ. Hist. (7) JZ Light & (14) --ZPublic (21) O ther Glare Services B. Potentially sign'ficant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: ~ C. Discussion of impacts identified above: III . Conclusions and Recommendations : Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. ✓ Concludes that there are no potentially si-gnificant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse imnacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommznds/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. T Ti'~"~"~', Nis w ~a qn .r. u, ~,ri . '•e A s~n u, ~r r40r '.0 •a :o p w w+ t L ~ F o' , i ~ I ~ I ~ a 10. L d « . . 3,r + .....:~a~J~..y. i~.........v~,_ ~ {T•} - - ~ - __~y.,~r _ . ~Y X.E ~ ' ► Y • ~ ~ I 78 :~l I • ~ ~ I ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ o o o I ~ ~ r+.«[43 r- . ~.r w.40 eo IN t: .e3 n4 as M Wa ea4 i`o rl u . . , z ~ ; . ~ . c. tc41• ~ ~ P4~.~t pOwU I ~ I ~ r ~ ~ I Q I / ° ~ ~ T _,....a. t c zo., ; o C a " . I o I a , , a • a ; o ea.t '•.s..• vaii.r , Valliy ti~•~vn I a ~ . p Jr. Nlqh S a• _ ~ s~r~ood0 ScAml p }~r~/e++~~ MELlE9LEI •VC. t o ~ 5r.r~[ ~ ♦ ~v S ~ll~f.~LL♦ _ i ~CL l»O _ " Q 10 oll M ° . ~ W7 d ! w r O~7 M ~ b ~ 1 ff W~Di iOt IW 10~. OO U~ I V t1 KA i,9 ~il~ ~f ~il t Iq 1• Ill t12 L'1 ISO III 13~ IS 1 12~ 1 1 IL Ol O IU N4 MO IOU U t w~~o• ~ : AIin~ Oron/t : . u a l v 5•~~ o c • ; • • . I ~ PoiA '1 0 ! r p".. ...a .tw o.,~~c a i ! i W qIV . ~ ..u..er ~ ~ ~ f~ r 7~ JJ • ~r i .v m 2 , 0 t` ~vC ! J ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 /~CG.~)!.,/. ~ r i T pp p / ~ ~ 610. 4~' I~p~ S0~ ~i! ~n ~ ~ E ER p' ~I,o '00 ' F - : _ _ ' r ~ t a• I P ~ ' - ` , ~x AL UMING M ~ SPOh7 ROLL/NG /LL ~ lNDUSTF}, ~ ~ ~ ~ p \ JCII AVC - ;J CVGL-O GucL. o ;i -sl ~ ~ ! o 1' ~ i~1~IO0II ~p ~ ~V , ~ ~ .Qa n. ~ pc,1d • q ~ 0 . ~ ~.e.'i:: w' , ~ ~ U ` ~ ~1R .2 6~ ~ W , • l ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ A#4~7 ~ qlc ~969 a . wwvutn ~ _ = ~ a..,,, w . , I q ~ ~ a.w. J~ iw~ e'C r- . _ - - ' I ~ ~ . ~ w • ~ -`_„~F~ I Mr [ ~i ' ' p t ~ ~ • ( I~ L~qAF i~ n[t Oi tr~. mi►sio.. Av r. . .C W_... . ' - ` a - • ; i ~ ~ ~ Ot I, ~ . ~ ~ o - ~ ♦ ~ !r. . wA Av ~ It _ ' . ~ ~ 1♦ M, ' ►rp~,~ ~ ~ SbHOn - I ~ e,MS,~''~..` 'r t , A. ~ _ ; OLlF1 I ~ f ~ ~ ; ~ ♦ w4y ~ ~ r VYLL~~ KA~ a Y . ~ ~ . _ . . _ . ~ l ~ i 1 ii ~ ' • 1 ° ' ~ ~ A~ I 3 d ` ` ' •~vtws~o~ ~ J'.r~l~ ~ I ~ . 1 ` - SPOUMA .ta,~~i •oei 1093f tc . a . $ w GOuNTV NOAD N9 2912• + • pci rrlCE rr. J312 ' •e l£ 1\J J ,ro.q'M'__' ♦wC __.r. ~ ~`i ♦ =a-~.~, ~ ~iti~vE , 4Tw ~ o , , ~ (2 4 r .F - - ~ . ~ T . . . . . ' . `r+ .~s`~~l~~..~~1~~ ~ij~~~'~ • . . , . . , . SvONAML COUntr LpUNt ~oua[ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RC'JV, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals, The Act also requires ihat an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is Such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the dearee of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation wauld be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional paqes, if necessary. You should . include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answars you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will ' help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. _ The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork 1n the future . No application shall be processed until the checkaist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for everV "ves" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLI3T FORM I. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Ragdy Teeter . 2; Address end Phona Number of Proponent: N,& 109 LTniyersity Roa~ C~Pokane.~.wa. ; nat= c~~R-h5?ti . 3. Date Cliecklist Submitted: ~3.~ . 4, Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane Countv, Wa; 5. Nama of Proposal, if Applicable: . LESLYE*First Addition , . ' , (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PI.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limircd to its size, • general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- standing of its scope and nature): , Tlipprci}1nsa7 wou1d p1at an rnximatelY 2.5 acres into 8 . Int A fif q.750 scxuare feet or more each ( ave . 11, 500 f t. 2) Nero StrPPt will be curbed and paved, There will be under- ~rn1md sentic tanks and public water. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmEntal setting of the proposal) : - R*h P,pirn sa 1 C-q,pp 3ttach Pd v i _ i n i tv man ~ ig Ori HCrOV Avenue in the Spokane Valley between McDonald Road and Euer~rePn~..]Ro?~ u 1g VeY' t"hP SY][~~ a11P_ AQlJfer.. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: ,T1inA * 1 474 9. I.ist of all Permits, Licenses or Goverciment Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones): ' RnnkanP C`n un _v prgm_],imiriaj:y ajajd Final Plat AAUrOV31r 1Roar3_C,; nra; nage,Water, Sewacre r and Buildina Approvals, , ctatA Apnrnval of water, sewage* and buildinqs. 10a. Do you,or the owner in the event you do not owti the subject land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or fucther activity related to or con- nected w[th thls proposal ? If yes, explain: Ti 0 lOb. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adlacent to thls proposals locatlon? If yes, explain: r 11. Do you know of any plans by others lncluding the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: ~n 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regardfng the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: At_ta h_r3 pr 1 imi~arv„-Plat Application and Exhibitp II. ENTVIRONMENTAL IMPAC'TS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: , (a) Unstable earth coriditions or in changes in qeologic X structures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil ? , , , . . , . , , . . . . , , , , , _2_ . (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? X _ (d) The destructfon, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features ? . . . . . , . , , , , ~ (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site ? . . . . . . . . . , . . , , , X (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposi[ion or erosion which may - modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of ' the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ~ Explanation: Roads and utilities construction, homesites and drivewavs will causq minor disruption and compaction of soils -in those__gffected areas. There will be little sitg qradinq recruired for homes . . ' Yaa Macbe-. ED 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . , . , , , , , ~ (c) Alteration of air movement, moiscure or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X Expiana,tion: The 50 or so vehcle tripg per.- dav_genex~ed__f=m 8 homesites would cause a, slight_degredation of ambient air _ quality. _ 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe IVo (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? X- (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or , the rate and amount of surface water runoff X ~ (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? X- (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) D:scharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity?,. . ~ (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~ (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or wlthdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? . . . . . . (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or throuqh the seepage of leachate, phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the qround waters? . . , , (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: On-s i t dra i nacJP di -c;noaal -q ruc--t-vrPS wi 1 1 bP rJP-,;ned to compensate for increased runoff from pavina and roofs. During `det winte_r monthg, thPrP rc~ul d hP mi npr 1Par-h i ncs nf -qnme gal tS t0 the Aciuifer. . -3 - f (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUAT4_ PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,) Yes n17vbe ~To 4. Flora. Willthe proposal result in: (a) Change in tlie diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, _ crops, microflora and a9uatic plants)? . . ' . . . . . . X (b) Redu^tion of the numbers of any unique, rare or - •endangered species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X . (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, . o* in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop _X Explanation: la,n;,d is cu,rrentlv vacant . EXi~ ' unch grass .,3gi,]„1 ,hp.rpp,la-,.g d wJ-th 1 a wn s a nd a,h rub s T S inc e.~h e_ p,je c e i s ~-glirrn,iin{itzd btt Gt bci1,3Ti.d?ti,. land, there should be'_ little additional • Yes Mavbe No 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the divecsity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna) ? . . . , . . . . . . . . . . _X - (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique,* rare, or ' endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . X (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result 1n a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . ' _X (d) Dateriorakion of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _X Explanarion; Tlp 9.~s,acreg,,, ,i,,, tnta 1 1ll z nf1 iiF-nr•ec~ ~„j,v r7nmPst i r ' a oLlla c i mply bP more dames~i n animala on sitQ. Yes M3ybe No 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X Explanation: _rP w,ill bg a~.ight increase in noise levels after r.onstruction. Durinq construction, noise levels would be hiqhest. Yes Maybe No 7. Li~qht and Glare. Will the proposal•produce new light or glare? Explanation: The addition of 8 lots amonq dozens would chanqe lictht . 1 eye 1.~ ver'z.._s_.light..l.N7_ Yes Maybe No 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of khe pa present or planned land use of an area X- f~ Explanation: UAM*1 _WWWRAW Ad CA's od gad ~ 0 _q_ • (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PI.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) ' Yes Movbe 1Vo 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? .X (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X Explanation: CQnstrLeti on of paved roa;ds r drives r homes * and _ . , and plastics. There will also be an on-going committment for fuel and electricitv. _ Ye s M azl:)e t\i.) 10. t~fsk of iJQset, Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not lfmited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions X Explanation: - Yes Maybe No 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 ~ Explanation: TPrhriica] 1 v i t- wntil d inc-_reayP t-hP arPa riPn_Vi tv _Bliahtlv..`,Tt is basicallv developinct a 2~ acre vacant lot in an a1,reay clevelo~Q"d area. 12. Housinq. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or . create a demand for additional housinq? . . . . . . . . . Explanation: rlfhe z rapo_c;;;1 wi? ?_qupp1,y 8 homesites tosati sf=van Px i-qt i ncl dPmanc3 fnr hin_the area~ ? Yes Nsaybe No 13. Transpor[ation/Clrculation, Will the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehiculc r movement ? . . . . . (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . ~ - (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement• of people and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? X- (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?. . . . . . . . . • • X - Explanation: mhp~.,nrppQsed would Qenerate about 50 uPr icle tri.ns ,3Pr day. T-t- would connect Herov Ave. as a throucrh.Lmesidential StrPet_ Th,Q increased hazard to road users will be sQ= what offset bv better access for emergency vehicles. - S - . (IF SPACE FOR EXPL11Nf1T10N IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADAITIONAL PAGES. ) Yes Mayhe h0 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altcred novernmental services in any of the following areas ? ° (a) Fire protection? Spokane. Co. Fize, Dis,tr,iGt,NQ. 1 X _ (b) Police protection? Spokane- Co. Sheri.ff s, Eji$t INQ.4 _ X~ + (c) Sch4ols? . F4aSt .Va11.ey AChqol Digtxict, , , , X i (d) Parks or other recreational facilities ? . . . . . . . . x- (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? ,_,X ~ (fl Other governmental services? : , . . , , , , , , , --X ~ Explanation: qp.ace,TOlire and f i rP rarQ _ c_ i nn __.postal and road maintPnance servicgs will be rectuired. Al1 existing s°r,st?,.Cpq s`s2li.ld han le the 8 new hom~,:,s . Yes MaybV r?o 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substan[ial amounts of fuel or energy? X- (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources Qf energy? -X- _ Explanation: T~-,p a, tnn,ahj, 1 Ps a'n nm s reauire fuel and electricity as wPll_ as s=,e natura,l gas and heatincr oil. The present availabilitv of those sources is adequate. Yes* Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result fn a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -X- ~ (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . , , , , . , (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . __X_ (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Solid wa,ste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ Explanation: Eaf• l,.n.t wi] 1 ravP nubli~ water tandrQround oower, t-P1 Pnhone, and clairhag,g,, pic} .us p..ge_rvic~ , Homes will have ; n,div; dLai sep.t,i.r tank~ and drainfields. Stormwater will be disposed of bv drvwells. Ye s Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health I azard (excluding mental health) ? „ . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explanation: -6- J • w (IF °PACE FOR D{PLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P:.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of -iny scenic vista or view open to the p-ablic, or will the pro- posal result in the creation.of an aESthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • X-- Explanation: . Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantiky of existing recreational opportunities X_ Explanation: Yes Maybe No 20. Archeological/Historical. W-i11 the p-oposal result in an alteration of a significant archeologici:l or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the peiialty of perjury that the above responses are - made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any wtllful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may wlthdraw any declaration of nonslgnlficance that !t mtght issue tn reliance upon this checkliste _ . . . Date: Proponent: - . ~ (Please Print or Type) Proponent: Ranrly mePtAr Address: N 109 UrLiversityRoad Phone: 928-6526 Person completing form: __Ferrv M. TaVlor Phone: 926-9539 Date: Ma-v 1c; _ 1 G7R t Dept. or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: ?-LdAJAI NC Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: e 8AV -7- r - . -1 ~ coGy'' _ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Offi ce Communi cati on \H ~~S • Date: May 16, 1978 T0: Spokane County Planning Commistion ~ ~ ~ FROM: Scott Fink, ~t.S. and Eugene C. Prat r r-S. SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat - Leslye tst Addn. 1. Ref erences : a. Map of subject, scale t" - 50" by Lawrence Leinweb►er; dated 5-8-78 received bq this of f ice 5-9-78. b. Ground-tJater Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Re- sources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Eff ect of Applied Surface Waters on Grouadwater Quality in the Spokane Valley, D.K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - Metro- politan Spokane Region, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District. d. Soil Survey, Spokane County, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. . e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Logs of Trentwood Irrigation District wells in Township 26, Range 44, Section 3. g. Field Survey Report, Scott Fink, Spokane County Health District, 5-12-78. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973. 2. Topography, soils and water. a. This project lies in a sloped area in Trentwood. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer. 0 b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to Sy slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically the soils are glaciof luvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. SCHD-ADM-118 ~ ~ Leslye tst Addn Page 2 May 16, 1978 d. The data from 2 Trentwood Irrigation District wells in the area shows the wells are 62 to 580 feet deep and have static water levels varying from 12 to 320 f eet below the surf ace. The highest total nitrogen level was 5.2 ppm. The Trentwood Irrigation District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. a. The plat sponsor has proposed 8 lots on 2.3 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage dis- posal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. Zn the course of the co:nduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the eff ect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage" treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage eff luent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por- tion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phos- phates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicato-, that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol- ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/t (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/t. The forecase year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is tOt mg/t above the natural background.---"The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when com- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on geoundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 3.0 to 5.3 ppm. A projected inre- mental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges 3.3, ppm, to 5.8 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. d: Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: ~ i ^ Leslye tst Addn Page 3 May 16, 1978 (t) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface water would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecologq. These systems are not • currently economically available for this project. (2) Sealed system s.whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as la- goons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. 4. Recommend that: a. A public water system includiag fire flows serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. b. Each lot be authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage system. c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this off ice prior to the signing of the f inal plat if more than a total of nine (9) dwelling units are authorized within the plat. cc: Leinweber and Taylor, Consultants sm 7~ $POHN'_~- COFKY PLAN 6t!9"9G, DEPr`~~ T 1.11 EP°° ~ EXHIB IT B . LEGAL DESCRIPTION LESLYE FIRST ADDITION The South Half of Tract 41 of TRENTWOOD ORCHARD, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "M" of Plats, on page 16; Situate in Spokane County, Washington. . wAs t ~ y~y~'r F~tr'` v► s'~~o ~~~'qt t~~o s~ ~ l 1 a t LESLYE FIRST ADDITION SEWAGE ALTERNATIVES FEPORT The proposal would establish 8 lots on approximately 2.5 acres in the Spokane Valley south of Wellesley Avenue between MacDonald Road and Evergreen Road. The ssils are Garrison Gravelly or very gravelly loam. Slopes are slight to moderate. There is no existing public sewage treatment plant nearby. Public water will be provided by Trentwood Irrigation District for domestic and fire flows. Lot sizes proposed are 9.750+ square feet with 75 feet or more of frontage on paved and curbed roads. Local drainaqe ways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Aquifer. No private wells were found within 100 feet of the proposed plat. Garrison soils are primarily deep glacio-fluvial deposits, (stream laid sand and gravel) with loam present in the tgp 4 to 5 feet. The soils are well drained. "Clay and lime have accumulated on the battom-of the pebbles in the lower subsoil" as reported irl the Spokan,e County Soils Study as done by the USDA Soi'l Conser-• vation Service. The soils have "slight" limitations for septic tank field filters because of the possibility of contamination of ground water and "severe" limitations for sewage lagoons because of excessive permeability when excavated below the loamy top layers in some areas. Alternative Sewage Disposal Systems are as fol,lows: (1) A Sewaqe Treatment "Packaqe Plant" providing primary sewage treatment with ground disposal of effluent by drainf ield: Each home would be supplied with a connection which would feed to a gravity sewage collection line, thence to a package tre3tment plant for treatment and disposal in a drainfield. The subdivision would yeild about 2,800 gallons of effluent per day (8 X 3.5 x 100). Using an estimated permissible drainfield dosing rate of 2 gallons per square foot per day, or 4 gallons per foot of 24" wide trench per day, this would require 700 feet of drainfield, or about ~ the amount of drainfield provided provided by individual on-site septic tank and drainfield systems. The drainfield and treatment area would require an area of apporximately 9,500 to 10,000 s-quare feet given 12' spacing and set back requirements. a. ADiVANTAGES - A package plant managed by Spokane County Engineers would probably remain in good state of maintenance with consequent good operating efficience. - Treatment ef f ic iency . could be somewhat higher than septic tanks and drainfields. „ ' Page 2 Sewaqe Alternatives Report b. DISADVANTAGES - The package plant would not remove, either chemically or biologically, dissolved salts such as nitrates arad phosphates to a significantly greater degree than indivi- dual on-site septic tanks. "The ability of a soil to remove chemical constituents by sorption processes de- pends on many different factors. One of the overriding factors is the hydraulic loading and interstitial velocity of the water passing over the soil particles. Many types of sorption phenomena are time-dependlent especially those sorption processes involving the migration of the chemical constituents into the pores of the solid particles. It is possible to readily sait- urate the surface sites of a soil particle with various types of chemical constituents and still have a 2arge potential sorption capacity. However, adequate contact time must be allowed for the uptake of the solute in the capillary pores of the solid." (1) "Another important .factor influencing the sorption capacity of sorption materials and soil systems is the chemical characteristi.cs of the solid phase. Clay minerals, among other types of solids, have a very high(jprption capacity for various types of chemical solutes. ~ From the above observations and recognizing that the ° clay coating the bottoms of pebbles in the lower sub-soa.l of Garrison Soils has high sorption potential for chemical solutes, a higher hydtaulic loading rate would diminish the effect of time dependent sorption processes. - Committment of a large lot within a residential area for a sewage treatment plant and drainfield. - Requirement for continuous operation and maintenance by a trained certified operator. - Committment for fencing and grooming of the treatment plant drainfield site. - Power committments to run the plants blowers and/or pumps. (2)An Oxidation Pond; A lagoon system, without aeration would dispose of organic material by biochemical processes and effluent by seepage either directly or in a drainfield. With proper design, lagoon systems can have removal rates for organic .material equal to or higher than most municipal secondary sewage treatment systems. a. ADVANTAGES - Better maintenance supervision than individual on-site systems. - More complete treatment of organic material than septic tank and drainfield systems. (1) Land Treatment and Disposal of Wastewater, by Sanks and Asano, "The L iving F ilter" Concept, page 182 , . t - P age 3 Sewaqe Treatment Alternatives -May not require any power for pumps, blowers, or heatt. -Low cost for operation. b. DISADVANTAGES - Aesthetically objectionable in a residential area, usually requires a suitable location visually screened. - Can have odor problems if organic loading becomes excessive or system goes septic when frozen over. - Some risk of breach if lagoon is constructed with berms. - Usually requires as much or more space than a package plant and drainfield system. - If excavation exceeded the loamy top soil depth, per- meability becomes excessive and a,greater risk of contamin- ation of the Aquifer is incurred. Has "severe" limitation for lagoons by Soil Conservation Systems. -eould be considered an "attrative nuisance" to the parents of small children desiring to use it for swimming, boating, etc. (3) Connection to a collectcr or trunk line serving a major Spokane Valley Sewaae Treatment Plant: This system comtemplates the construction, by others, of a large scale sewage treatment facility with primary, secondary, and tertiary treatment capability. Effluent disposal would most probably be in the Spokane River. Each lot would have individual sewer connections heading to collector and trunk lines serving the major system. a. LDVANTAGES - Best treatment efficiency. - Most reliable maintenance and operation control. - Least likely to adversely affect groundwater b. D I SADVANT1aGE S - Such,a system does not now exist, nor could it be planned, environmentally reviewed, publically heard, approved, funded, designed, constructed and activated, realistically, within less than 2 to 5 years. - Such a large central treatment facility may ultimately pot be the sewage management system adopted for the Valley. Certainly the cost of the plant alone would be great, but the cost of installing a trunk and collector system throughout built-up areas would be enormous. - There is no existing dry line on Heroy Avenue to connect to. (4) Sealed Laqoon System: This oxidation pond system relies on the excess of annual evapotranspiration over precipitation to dispose of effluent. a. ADVANTAGES - Good treatment efficiency . P age 4 Sewaqe Alternatives Report - No cont.ribution of chemical solutes to groundwater. - More reliable operation and maintenance responsibility. b. DISADVANTAGES - Aesthetically objectionable in residential area - Can have odor problems if system became excessively organically loaded or was frozen over in winter and went septic. - ZYhe annual evaporation/precipitation water budget in Spokane Valley is quite variable, and generally marginal enough that very large acreages would be required to in- sure disposal of effluent. These acreages would be on the order of 4 to 14 times those requirad~ for package plants and drainfields or seepage disposal/would be expensive and a rather undesirable land use committment. (5) Individual on site Septic Tank and Drainfield Systems: Such systems dispose of organic waste by biochemical anearobic decomposition in a septic tank. The effluent, then flows to a drainfield where it is further processeiA by the soil coluann surrounding it, and the effluent then is disposed by a.combina- tion of evaporation, transpiration, from vegetation, and percola- tion to groundwater. Percolation would normally only occur during wet winter months where precipitation exceeds evapotrans- piration. a. ADVANTAGES - Septic tanks and drainfields are easy to install, operate and maintain. - Do not normally require major collector lines, trunk lines, pumps, blowers, precipitators, lift stations, etc., to perform their treatment processes. They are normally passive, gravity systems. - No odors when properly installed and maintained. - Low and infrequent maintenance. b. DISADVANTAGES - Systems may not remove all dissolved salts such as phosphates and nitrates. During wet winter months, some leaching of these salts could occur to the Spokane Aquifer. Topograph ically, this site is sloped enough that surface seepage of heavy rainfall or smow melt would be significantly less than that for flat or dished ground. Water quality readings for 208 Irvin Water District Well near the site in the Spokane Aquifer "208" Study show cansiderable margin before Federal minimum water quality standards would be , a Page 5 Sewaqe Alternatives Report violated. - Operation and maintenance is left as the individual home- owners responsibility. From a review of alternative sewage treatment and disposal methods for the Preliminary Plat of Leslye First Addition, the most feasible method appears to be individual on-site septic tank and drainfields. Perry M. Taylor, P. E. Leinweber and Taylor, Consultants ~TA y40 i,°1;~~~~~~, ~ti;;,` iv~'`•", ~o ~ ~Q ~ ~ '~.~~1 ,a i ~ ~ ~ r r \ ~ ~ ~ y a ~ i ~ ^ " ~ ~ m .".i . _ ~ ~ r. a. . ~ ~ I J , ~~a _ _ ~ R ~ -~._.:?~y:s11~ ~ ~l ~ ~Cri~~.:~i = s a.► • f~ r r R s r w#_+k ~M ~t ~ i si ~ n~~** s~~+~ s■ s a s s ft s••~ M s f~r t yr s* s a s• s f a s r s+~ s a! a*.•~~ r~ f fi ~ s•« t:~. ~ y* a•~e s♦ a■ s~c . s ~--xrL r .~V vL vC1~.~1J~~i l.~'~.~.L V f ~uU1.L4Gi~+V ►7♦drrT!@ fJI' A~ ~^~J ~IS.iA~~CE~.~.....t*»~:~~.;..,.~..~..~..~«.~*,~.,«.......~..~..*.~:,~*._**~~.....~~...~►..~.......~... ~o~a' ~a~~ cf ?a~d ~n *:~.s Su~~•r_sion: Z. ~ kc:es Tota:i Number oi Lots ~ Proposzc deasit~ o~ ~he Plat: 3. S'~ Lot9/Gross Acre ^~t~. amouat of ad~oining land controlled bp this owner or apoaaor: I~J.~~ Acres ~ ?r~poses Use of controlled adjaiaing land: '~that is the driviag dista,nce ~.n caileB to the nearest fire statiaa? Z M~ Shopping facil~ties? 2 M~ Mur,LC~aal Boundar~: Z►~.y ~ p3ved ~treet or highway ~~a ? ~ U~+s*~~~t+Rst~fsi~saiss~sssssssas~st~~irsara s~ aw ~aa ~s~ss ~sss rr •s~sssrr,sarstss,~.:ss~tyea,rra.:~ s~+rs~ T ~ . : ~~.;,e :'~e ~~osed ~ .~.c use o~ ~::.e riat : S~.~g:..~ r ~:rai ~ _~~s ; . Duplexes C Iadicate lots ~'or duolexas: Multi-family dwell:.ng un:.ts C Inu~cate wbi ch lots : Mobile gomes ( Othe,.~ ( Descr~be other uses: Describe anp son-resident:al use ~aroposed ia t~e PIa ~ '~wa L~~ ~~a : rese~ ~ use o_' ~ae ~roper ~y P= opose-: ~o ~e ~?a ~ted:' 4 I Gt C A^I List tytae af uees: Cultivated l~nd: ac:es. Pasture: acres , Timber: acres. Vacaat: ~.'~j acres. Other: :~~,=e~ . Is keepiag of aniraals desired? No ( Yes C~ '~y_oe :~o wn e~,'+'et.~ ~ot,~S~ho~o~ P-~ 11Z~~VYril"['~LLil~7~s~4~*MtM►~r~ltOS~t~i~fi**~a#s1i~s~stf*y~~l~*Ii~/~ii~tat~f*W#~M~M~a~~~i~i~>I~s~ra~t=uf sst~~ssarie t s s.. D~ ~~u ~0 t~Lle r.Ldt ~ l.t 7 r:.~ ~ a ~.-r v r. c-c. . •ti __.Y _ ~ ~ - • - ~ - - - ' - lopment? ~ ' ~ ~ To what level of impro9ement wiL streets be construc~aci: Grave'_ . . Curb ~nd Gravel ~ ) . Curb and ~ ~ . ti.' . ~ - ~ ~ . . ' - - , ~ ~ ~sc..~ibe any combinatiens of abov-~_ : ,~t is the time period ex~ectad : or cam~lete cievelovment of the ~lat : i~I . _ . . _ Square ~'eet ~ _ . . . - - ~ =:~timated Sale ~r~~e p . . - . : _ _ . ~ ~ ~ ~ _ a _ _ _ they ~re sold : No ( ~ } . Yes ( ) . ~~al deed ~~"95"~Z'ZC~lfl?18 be included ia the sale ef Iots? No (,~C Yes ( es,~, ex-ala.in: ~1T i„i wC•~~~sss■+~t*ass~tsss+~s~sssss•~ss~ss~~i~sa~~~s~~r~c*s~s~aa~rssrt:saas+~ass~ss~~~a~~r~#~r~i„ 3 ~ ?ad.icate `.he ?roFoseti methcd oi 3e~~rage disposal: S~eotic ~ark ; . :.as~~oa C ~ ~ ~~eatmeat plaat ~ Other, or cocabinations CDescribe) ~ad.icate the propoaed eource of wate~ s~.vplq: Individua:: ~.~e'_.~.~ ; . r~.~c? = : ~ ; ( ~ } . Private community system C v Iadicate method o~ eztenc~.ag se~^r~_ce to the loLs (yweilingsJ : Uadergrouad ut3.lity~ easemeats C Overhea.d u~;~ ~.±~r e?se►~e~~~ Ut~.lities in streets C,?~) . No easements C Indicate the distance frcm this proposal to the nearest exi.sting water main: - ~ ~ ~a~=~~`~ __~e ~a ia?~~~~ .~.a~.~a.~• ~ 1~~~.~..v ~ . . ~ E X H I B I T A pRELZMIlNAKy ptiAT p,pP'LICATIQN FQRM ( Coatiaued ) page Z jI AMS - (Contiaued)•~s*~sss~~+~+s~s~ssss~+r~ss**s.ssssssss~s*ssss**+s~sssssrtsts*sss~s•~si~r~. List utility compani or districts e ec ed tc provide service to this P'lat: Electri city : . . . • Gas : Water : r o e ~ Phone : fN5 AG'KNOWZ~NT~"ss~ssss:.s:~~s:sss*sssss~sss~.~s..s~ass~~~~+~~~s~~sw~~ssa~~..+s~~~~•~.~s*ssssss PRoPOSM PiaT 'liaME: L E S L Y~ 1 2 S T A i~ p. , h I, tYie undersigned, have compl.eted the iaformation requeated, and the Prelimi-+Ary Plat has beea prepared by me under my supervision in accordance with the requirasnenta of the Spokaae Caunty p1Anri ag DepsrtmeIIt aad the lawa of the State of _ in. l (.S 1$Zl@Li . tA t 8 L. ~E1y q ~,,~c.~ ~ Ma►.Ski,y~~'F~ (Address) Z:-/290~ Phone : . JQ ~ e~ ' ~p • ZlP: . . , ~ I, the uadersigned, swear uader the penaly ~y flf pe:jury t'tlat the above _os-ponses are made truthfully and to ths best of my kaowledge. I alsa uaderstaad that, should there be aay willZUl misrepresentatioa or wiLful lack of full disclosure on my part, Sookane County may withdraw any declaration oi aonsigaificaace that it might issue ia reliance upon this checislist. (Sigaed) Daze: ~ , (Adc3ress) &e' r~ one : i ~ a it--S,a' Zip : NOTARY •Date : Z, NOTARY S'''r~Ai. : ~ Part T-1 - to be completad by water pwz--reyor A. T'his subdivision (ia) Gjaaat) si.tuated within our service area. B. We are (able) ) aad wil7-ing to supplY this subdivision with adequate water Tor (domestic) (fire) ) uses. C. Saiisfactor3t arrangement (have) ~~+e►u~-&Ot) besn made to serve this progosalo D. Sigaature (only when items A, B & C are true aad completed) ' ' • • ~ - .~i . ` purvsyors name sigsa. :-ars ar.3' ~i Lle caze ...~*~..s..~.•..s*s....:~.....»~..*.•*..........*...*~s.....:~~.:...:~.::.....~............*..~..~ Part III - to ba completed by Health District A. Health District requiremeats for prelimina.*y plats have C )beea 3atisfied. B. Si e ~ ~ f ~S.:ly- ~ f / f` l~ signature aad title date *i*rrs~~l~e~~~i~lettla~iili~it~r~~#!~ls~l#MMM~*~~U~rM~1~ili+~~t~~tfli~fi+~~i#ats#*A~~~fsMi~w~~~s~~Rw~~~Rrt! ~ • r w EYHIB TF"L a PRELIl4iINARY PLAT APPLICATICN FORM • ( Coatinued ) Page 3 si*RSS~f1~a71tft~#~itl~ifi~~~s~i~*~ff#*a*RiMlRls~~ftrt~as~t#~I~ti#flt~lf~i*s~f~~sis~~!l~r~ffr~~~t~~i! Part N- to be completed by Countq Engineers Office A. Couaty Eagi.aeers Office requiremente for preliminary plat ha e haQe nat) been sa.tisfied. r B. $1gI18tule gnature aad t ~ie date ~~t~/~l~sli~~+resifl~M~#r~M~t*~t~r*tyt*~~~i~M!**~~~~Mtt~Mrt*s*~~t~1~~1~s~1S~~~~s~~~Mt~*t~~s~~!#Rf~tis# Pa.rt V- to be comDleted by Couaty Utilities Dept. A. County Qtilities Department requirements for preliminary plat ve (have not) besn satisfied. B. 'gaature ( , . ~ signat e a.ad title date l~ss~M•Msyss~+RSfsa~s~*~sss~ass+~*i~assss~~s~M~~r+~*~~~ts~~frfisisA*rt*ssiR~~*M~MM~R~~~ss~*~~lrw~w This part to be compieted bp Pl.an--;: g Dera.rtment PlanninR Departaent I.nformation /19/70 Checked by: Date Subm+.tted: School Dist: ict : j5)j5r Pzelim_~ Plat Fee : Flxistiag Zoning: ~ Checklisi r ee Q•~ Zoae Change F:.le No.: 91 ~ 4 Date Esta.blished : Number of Lots: ~ Advertised Zone IIpgrsdiag: • Section 3 Townshz.p Location. Plat Fi.1.e Na.: ' `28 Hearing Date : 7~ Rang-e : - 0,93-0-/ Flat Name : ~ ~ ~ RECEtr)T pate L2M 2 LI, . Received From Jgx~) IaAgutc A dress i . . ~ ~Ihhw p -AzzL- ~ --[33o llars ~ o r . - IA~r- ;V4V4 144 N4 ALt - , 111t4 ULM4) - '160`4, ~ ACcaUNr HOw p,aia 141.51 AMf {3F CASH c Actoural AMT, FAiD CHE;hC ~ ant~~tE r~~waEY ~ ^~~..~L COrTN~'y PI,PNWi~,~~ k}llE aRE}ER