The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-21-67. _ g, x; I tfd ~1l- J. ~i.'.~ ✓r~ ~ " ' ~ t ~ Ifl ~ A3X l u lY o-i~ Otl1 ~ BOARD OF COUr'TY COMMISSIONERS , FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING ZQNING MAP ~ PROPOSAL, ZE°21-67 ~ I WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission did, after public hearino held on Nlarch 30, 1907, forward to the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation that the Zoning Map not be changed from the existing idiultiple Family Suburban classification to, the Commercial classification on property described as follows The north 180 feet of the south 230 feet of the E 1/2 of the E 1/2 of Tract 144 of ppportunity lying in Section 179 Township 25 Nv, Range 449 E.W.M. I and, ~ WHEREAS Robert J. '%"cKahna, Attorney for Ervin L. Brown and I ~ Rmy P. Lackey did address a letter to the Board of County Commissioners ~ dated April 13, 19 67y objecting to the recommendation of the Planning Commission and requesting a hearing before the Bosrtli of County Com- missioners on the matter, and, - ' ' WtiEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners did hold a oublic ~ hearing on the matter on May 2, 1967 to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission9 the objections thereto9 and testimony ~ of any interested persons, and ~ ~ I WHEREAS, at said hearing, opportunity was aff orded those favoring and those opoosing the above described Zoning Map proposal, and the i , Board of County Commissioners having fully considered the testimony biven, letters of interested parties, the records and minutes of ~ the Planning Commission, and all other evidence presented, and having personally acquaihted themselves with the site and vicinity in i question does hereby find ~ That we concur with the Planning Commission ln their ~ ' recommendation to deny the subject zone change and f ind 1 the reasons expressed by the Commission as reported in ~ the minutes of their hearing of Nfarch 30, 1967 sufficieat ' ~ and controllingo ~ ' I i NOW9 THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane ~ County does deny the application of Ervin L. Brown and Ray F. Lackey ' to change the Zoning Map from the Multiple Family Suburban classifi- ~ cation to the Local Business classification on property as described ~ aboveo ~ DATID THIS 9th day of May, 1967. ~ ~ BOAitD OF COUNTY :COMTKIS S IONERS OF S POKANE COUNTY 9 6JASHINGTON , I ~ ATTEST ~ VER'VON W OHLAYD 0..~ ~ C lerk of the Board j ~ r / N ✓ L„` Frlealana Deputy ~ ~ y~ • . i _ - i 'y y , . r J . , f I ' • ~ ~ 1 'r _ ~ _ - i - , . • ~ ' 1 ' II I . . . , Y, 1{ ~ , - ~ ' ~~•t :~~S~Y _ ~ . - ' ~ ~ rr - 3 - - _ .~WE L.; , ~ 'v v'O . . a ,J~l:~ ` - ` •---~..+_~+~i6.'bl~d..~~`.'-' _ . _ t. • - - . . a . ' ' •r~-- "q ~R~.'~ . a. i - _ . . _ _ ~ . - ~ t 1, ,~,.~r+ n_ 'j~ ~ r+~~ • ~ ~ _ - , ' - ~ • • , 4~~. f,~+s ~ { ~ ,:w. . ~ . . , 4 S J ~ , . ' - . , ~ ° _ ~ , ~ ~ , ~ i• ~ _ . { `y s ' ~1~y 'a, 1 a ~ c~.. • ' ~ -1 ~ ,j1}~~/ c ~ • t 5 + - " ~ . •r L . : ~ • ~ ..e ....9; . t" ' 4L.- '1'n3_ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~6~, a- y ~.~~~~~~~4 r. ;r~» ~ ~ - ~ . . . . _ . ~ . - • . " . - . . _ . . . . . . . ~ ~ a..._ + .y5.. ' ' . . ~ ' ' , ~ . j- • . y , ' . . • ' ` _ + • . pi ~ ♦ ~ ~ ` d . ~~f Y ~ o ~-1. ~j,~lk , - --.,r . ~ . • y.~~, ~ :r - '4; ~ : .,s , ~ - y~ 4~ ~ t'y1+ ! ` ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~y ^ N r ~ ~ ~ 1; i y ^ ~:r., • , r' - • ~ ~ ` , , ' ~,s= : ~ . ~ ~ s , ss. * ; ~ r-''r~ 1 , , r ~ . . h ^ ~ . 4 ~ If ~ ` . t':~ ~.3 ~~'~t'.y ~ ~t) e ~ ~ , ( y S ~ _ _ , ~ . ' . ' " • _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 . . . . . . . „ . ..-rx►" _ ~ ~i ' . , ~ ~ . G , , t«,~~F , _ ti _ , , " r ~ - . ~ , _ t~~•~ . :a►C 1► " s - . „r- ~ ~ . . _ _ _ _,n.~. - ,y~.-.~ v . ~ ~ .~s , r v+p'':'~" ~ ~ . y = ~ a: . :r n.,.:~' _ ~G . ~ ` , o ~ - - , ` , { ' . - ~ ~ _ _ . ~ r f . . ~ ~ ~ Y' • _..~'^•..~r"' ~^i~ y~ s~°~..,~ ~ ~ . '~~~~i~ _ _ - ~ n . . ~ "'~I' ' _ , r.. ...j ~3 . - t _ ~ - _ k ~ . ~ , . ~ r . • . . _ , ~ . ~ ~ f . . . r' ~ . . . , „y'" 1' . . ~ 4~~:~~~ ~ : 'R'~~.r-,.,,..w.. - . . ' . . . . _ " . . _ . ..,r.. , ~ _ _ ~ ' ~ ~ ` , - . . . ' ~ ' r , . . m ~4,,,- , ~ ' ~ , ~ r~ ' _ . J F`~V~U it F-D fkri i;y 1 1561 ~ COUNTY CON~NIiSsIUNERS C E m3y 1 1 t COUNTY CO~rJ~ Spokane County Board of County Commis sioners County Court House Spokane, Washington Dear Sirs For more than twenty-five years, the owner's of property north of Sprague Avenue, between Farr Road and University, have opposed commercial and local business zoning The Spokane County Planning Commission, organized to assist the Spokane County Board of County Commissioners, has denied the petition for a spot zoning for local business at Sunderland and Sprague Avenue in Spokane Valley and zoned it as Multiple Family Suburban, specifying that it should not be commercial, industrial, restricted-commercial, nor local business We who live in this area agree with the findings of the Planning Commissiorb Their comprehensive planning, surveys, and analyses have promoted a sta- b1e economy and provided us a pleasant place in which to live We believe that this proposed spot zoning is not in harmony with the purpose and intent of the general plan for the physical development of this district, so wish to retain the Multiple Family Suburban clas sification The proposed local business zoning would adversely affect the health, safe- ty and general welfare of residents in this area It would be detrimental to the use or development of adjacent properties in the general neighborhood We do not believe in the establishment of running ribbons of business zones along our major thoroughfareso This practice sets the stage for traffic strangulation Mr Robert Parker, Assistant County Road Engineer, has stated that this already has presented a major problem in traffic safety and direction On Sprague Avenue at Walnut Road ls a restricted residential zone You will recall the bitter fight that resulted in that zoning restriction You could not expect these people on Walnut Road and surrounding areas to look favorably on a local business zoning just 120 feet away We are deeply appreciative of the community growth guidance afforded us through the years by the Spoka.ne County Planning Commission and its able directors and planners. We..believe our district boundaries should be care- fully maintained We are adequately and conveniently serviced by a wide variety of comerc- ial establishments, such as the University Shopping Center, the Dishman buszness district, and the variety of businesses on the south side of Sprague We have many drug stores and a wide variety of drug store items are to be found on the shelves of all super markets, variety stores and grocery stores Since most of us cannot be present at the special hearing May 2, 1967, to be held for the purpos e of hearing the appeal of Brown and Lackey, pertaining to the proposed zone change, 2E-21-67, from Multiple Family Suburban to Local Business, we appreciate this opportunity to present our views by mailo _ Will you please have this letter read in open session at the meeting referred to above ? Thank you Respectfully yours, . D ~ ~ AY 1 1 ~ COUC~~ Cow`~~'j E9 V ED MAY I 1967 CDUNTY Llr.ltIl iIJJSIONips WEa THE PEOPLE LIVING IN THE AREA OF SUNDERLAND AND SPR.AGUE, are opposed to the proposed zoning change from Multiple Family Suburban to 1,ocal Business classification . 1.23 X .4 . , ~0,0 ; n , t.Q~-,n~ r- ~..c~, Z4 to -r ~ 67 ~ ✓ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ TYIOMAS n-. "-an P ~30x ~ ashin~ton Spok~e' ~ r 1 ~ ~ ~ i i ► ~ ~ , ✓ 1 t ~ . , . . , ~ • ~ ~ • 3 ~ ~ THo14AS 11. 311~"at~,Ch p r~. 34x 308, hin~ton 99213 ~ 5pok ane, Nas t 'A 40 ~ , 4 ~ . ~ / ~ r . i~ ~ w _ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ THOMAS H. 3Ii:NZ °r). 3ox 308, Di sirm an 3ranch Spokar►e, ','Jashinbton 99213 i / • - ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~-n- ~ ~ ~ . , ~ 'X4 ~ ~ . ~ . r r='O r .~G• j-~ l~t` C't.,~c~2~a~--~ ~--P '7~ . . , , ~ TH7MAS H. 3Ii=,NZ ° 0- Liox 308, Disr►man 3ranch Spokane, '.'lasiiinptan 99213 Q~C- r / ~ 000, ~'~/'~~•1 ! ! ~ ~ / " . 000 4` , • , , ~ , ~ . NOMAS H. BIENZ r. r`. BOX 306, DIShM/1N BR. W YUASH3NGTON,~ • • SPOKANE, WASH. 992 i3 ` • `iU~`~~ . . • l Z;27o v,~,~ S . ,?~✓,=~s~ ~ . ♦ 1 THOMAS H. 3IEN? ° O. dox 308, Disi►man 3ranch Spokane, 'JJashington 99213 RL%.*riVED " z`'- 62 MAY 1 1961 SPOKANE COUNiY ` PLANNING COMMISSION ~ ~ -7 ~ 7 I ~ . , , ~ THTMAS H. 3IEN? P 0. 3o x 308, Di s►im an 0'r an ch Spok ane, Washin gton 99213 .7 . !'-~~l.! ' f~!,'~!' ~ . t..- •~.,t-r.. ,R:, i-- ~ 7. eo~ ~?4A'ae, ~ ♦ ~ r , , % ~i+ ~7+' L~/ ` " -'~'i~,~. ~r ~ ` y . • . ~i_..~ ~ ~ ~ -C'oo'- d ~ or er~~~~ ~ J / . ♦ ' i . ~'~?~I , ' -1,•~,t„r ~ ~ - _ " , ~ ~ ' ' • r! ) ~ l-~7 ; . ' ~ f , T/`.!-± i~ = • . - Or v . _~.1'' ^ ' ~ ,~,,z~~~,~►_,., ~ - ' _ . l ` , ~ • , THO,YlAS H. 3I EN Z ° n. 3ox 308, Distiman c3ranch Spokane, '~Vashinbton 99213 .i' L~F f ri"'' ~ I-`. ~L"-~'~~,. ~....-J ~ ' ~ ✓~'v(~ ~GL.-~.~~i~ _.r ~ r~' c-~ ~ /F~.c- •~%71.f ~ ~r~"- (r - ~ - r 1 ~ ~ . ~ ~~-°Y~ ~ 1,.~ - ~ . / ~ ~ ~ ~ r~-'~ ~ 'Z''~ . . ~a : s ~ ~ . ~r. ~ ~a~'~~ ~ _ - I^ ~'j • ,r i. . ~ ~ ♦ . ~ ~ -~~..f s -?i'.t'~ ~ (j S f" , • . : =r , . , ~ ~ . ~ ✓ ; J - , : ' r ; ~ J /'~c~„~-'1 . -s , f • ' ' . " ' ' ~ ~.,.•P'.r/1 ~..y'/1 G"t~~ _ ..z._ ~ ~ -t~"~+' ~c~-t/'i'~• . _ >>a r . ~r . ` (i~-/ , ~Q . ~~-~i!/~ L~ L )►-~1 .v-~7 i ~ •'r~ rI e74 ~ - ' ' : , ` 'r- . , . ~ L J ~,=a.J~.,- ~ ; ~ l~ ~ _f . " f~"%~~f/~i! -~r > l.~f / 7 ~ L~7-Z.ii,j. r!•`-~'/~l~~iL.~y,..~L~iv~ ~ ~ - t/~`l. ~ ~ 'd"`yC~....~+~ K- . - = ~ ~~'l. tr--~r? t.~! t~" .~~-~t~..~• ~(t-~--C-..e+t~ ~i~-"G'~^Q`l~--~ - • . . / ' , ~ . . . _ . ' . • . ~ ~~~,,f ~ j ~ { •~i~~'"~-"~r''~ 1 ~p"> r...-~_~L-'a::: t' •"2.= _aC.~-s- ~ - ' r ~f 1 TIi~)NIAS 1-1. P D. 3o x 308, Di shm an 3ranch Spokane, '1Jashinaton 99213 ~ . r , . ' sr , / er l/ • ~ . K ' %-y _ , : / ~rj~ , i ~ •f~ t - , ~i_ -~...r_'~--~-s `J' ~ ~ " (...y? ~~-y> t~~,•,f~.~-i,~/ J' U ~ L„~t. c' - x:..'~ iJ - ~9 v-~' ~ r. ~ ~ V , G `7 ,,,yr ~ ~c.s~-~` ' ~ • ~ ,1~ l'~'~..•F%'~ ~~~~./t ~ r' r~r~-~'1 ---t ~t..~.-- ...~s'~ ~ ~ l' * ~~Tc•,,~•! f'~ - ~ ~ • _ ~ 1 ~•i9ti...- _ j-1_ , ✓ ` ' ~CJ/ `r1 ~ ~ V - I' " . l -'"C••~+G/ . ✓ / L-t _ G^ .~i./ ~ ' . _ ~ / C'r ~ ~-r f....~+-~! ~ t+ ~'r f-j- ~..~syQ~; c~ < , ' -3~(~f,~/ . ~ C-'1f i'~,~-,~ ~ cti_; / ' ~ -~s-- ' . f~ • ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ y/ ~ ; ` ~ ~-.-7j~,,, ~ ' ~ . t= r' 4,a . P , ~ ~ ~`Q ~`"79 - 7,r ~ " r ~ ~ ~ . _ L - t . . ~ AS H. 3IGNZ °~.iox 308, Di siim an Bran ch Spokane, 1,11ashinoton 99213 ~ / . l J• ~ ~ 'r•. r . . ~ ~ . G • • - , ,io , ✓ ~ 14 7 ` ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ t~..~-~.•s+► ,C.y.~ . _ . ~ ~ ~ el r~''s~-• i? y%` / , - , . r S✓;, ~ ~ .j/~ ~ -t... ~~-~ti• j~\: T ~~Y" r~~l_.. _ R ~ ~ : i.' ~ ' - . ~ ~ ~ . I ' ~ - ~O f' f.. _ ~--~t'---~2!.~•t~ .-~'1 ~r' j2 t.. . - - . . . . ~ . ~ , r • ' - - . ; ~ ~ ~ ~ 40 :r . . • ~ ~ RECEIVED MAY 1 1967 5poksne County Board of County Commiasioners SPOKANE COUNTY County Coart Hoase PLANNING COMMISSION Spoksne, Wsshington Uear Sirs: For rnore than twenty-five yeare, the owner'• ox property aortb of 5prague ,Aveane, between Farr Road and University. have opposed commercial and local basines• soning. The Spoksne Couaty Planning Commiosiou. organi:ea to assist the Spolane Corinty Board of Couaty Commissioaers, ha• denied thc petition for a spot soning for local bwinss• at Suaderlanct and 3prague Avena• in Spokaus Valley and :ooed it a• Multfpl• Family Subarban, apecifyiog that it •hould not be commercial, industrial, restricted-coaamercial, nor local busiaess. VYe who live in !hi• asea agree with the fiadings of the PZa►aaing Commfssioa Tbeir compsebensive plaaaiai, •urveya, and analyses bav psoxnoted a•ta- ble econamy and psovidad ns a pleasant place in wrhich to litre. W e believe that tbi• proposed spot soning is not ia hazmoay w►ith tbe pnspos• and iatent oi the geaeral plaa fos the phystcal development of thi• dietsict., •o wish to retain the Multiplo Family Suburban cla►ssitication. The proposed local businvs• soniag wonld advesaely aifect tbt bealth, •afe- ty and gtneral welfas• ot residen!• ia tbi• area. It would be dets3mental to the use or development of adjacent psoptrtfes ia tbe geaeral neisbborhood. Wt do aot believe in the estabtishmeat of runAiag sibboat of bnsineit• zoaee aloag otir znajos thosouSblases. Thi• psacticd ••t• tb. •talle for traffic •trangulatioa. Mr. Robert Parkes. Asaistaat Cocuity Road Eogioeors ha• •tated that this •lseady has preieatsd a nsajos psoblem ta traffic safetr and diroctioa. Oo Spragae Avenue at Walant Rosd is a sestsicted sesidentisl sone. You w►ill recall the bitter fight tbat sesulted in tbat soning sestriction. You could nat ucpsct these people on Walnnt Road and surronadiag area• to Iook favorsbly oa a local bwiaes• soaia$ just 120 fset away. W• are deeply appseciatiw of the coramuaity growtb gaidanc• aftorded ns tbrough the years by the Spokaae Coantr Plznning Comanission and it• able directors aad plaoners. Wit beliove ous district baundaria• should be case- fu,lly maiataiaed. vYe are adequately and convenieatty serviced by & wide vsritty oi comerc- ial •stablishrneots. snch a• tbe Uaiversity Sbopging Ceater, the Dishman busiaaas district, aad tLe variety of bnsiaesse• on tbe •onth •ide of 5 ra ae. We have many dsug stose• and a wide variety ot dsag •tore tems are to e fonnd on the shelves of all super markets, varfety storee and grocery •tores. . Sin+ce nnost at w caaaot be psaseat at tba spocial bearing May 2. 1967, to be bold jos the puspos• of bearing tbe appeal ai Brown aod Laclcr►y. pestainios to tbo proposod aosa ebaage. U-21-67, f:om Multlpls Family Snbwrban to Locsl Bnsiness, we apprEciate thfs apportuafty to pr.••at oas vi•ws br maii. Wlll ya►o pleaae bave tbfs lsttes sead ia opes •essiou at tbr meeuag reterred to above ' Tbank you. 1Respectiully yours. ~ , . ~ -WE, THE PEOPLE LIVING IN THE A.REA OF SUNDERLAND AND Sk'RAGtTE, are oppoaecl ta tbe proposed soning chsnge tsom Mu,ltiple lrsmily Suburban to Local Businesa classification: ~ . ii ~ .''b rd►?'~ • ! . . ' < ` ~ I DANIEL W. GIBONEY . ATTORNEY AT LAW ~ 803 Sherwood Building West 510 Riverside Avenue Telephone: MAdison 4-1319 Spokane, Washington 99201 Area Code 509 April 20, 1967 Dard of County Commission:-::~, pokane County Cot . _ You are scheduled at 11:00 o'clock A.M. on Tuesday, May 2, 1967 to hear an appeal by Brown and Lackey seeking to change the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission denying a zone change from Multiple Family Suburban to Local Business on the northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Sunderland Road in the Spokane Valley, Planning Commission file ZE-21-67. On March 20, 1967 I wrote to the Planning Commission in regard to this matter and I request that you consider that letter together with this letter in regard to the appeal. Zoning recognizes that all economic aspects of our community must be served. It also recognizes that these activities can best be served by separating and having like activities located together. This, of course, means that at some point you must change from one zone to another zone. Z'he argument that because the area adjacent is of a less desirable zone you should therefore reduce the zone in the adjacent property to the less desirable zone is not valid. You do in fact merely move the border so another assault can be made on the next adjacent more desirable zoned property. This erosion of our zoning destroys value and stability of our homes. I urge the commissioners to follow the general plan of the Planning Commission and confine the commercial activity to the area south of Sprague Avenue and north of the railroad tracks. Such a ruling will maintain the homes to the north of Sprague and satisfy the commercial needs of our community. Very truly yours, - r ~ Daniel W. Gibaney dwg :mf NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIVG RE ERVIN L BROWN AND RAY F LACT(EY APPEAL MARCH 307 1967 PLAr1NING COMMISS ION RECOMMEI`1DATION DEN IA L OF BROWN A ND LACKEY ZONE CHANGE A PPLI CA TI ON MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN to LOCAL BUSINESS - FILE ZE-21-67 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 11•00 o tclock ,A M. on Tuesday, Niay 2, 1967, at their office i+n the County Courthouse, to consider the appeal of Ervin L Brocan and Ray F Lackey from that particular recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission dated March 30, 1967, which denied the application of Ervin L Brown and Ray F Laclcey for a zone change from Multiple Family Suburban to Local Business on the following described property Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44, E W M. The North 180 feet of the South 230 feet of the East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Tract 144 of Opportunity NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony eithEr for or against the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission as outlined above. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 13th day of A pril, 1967 VEF.NOST tJ OHLAhD Clerk of the Board stt ' , r . ~~BLIC„ RZARzNG RE: ~RVIN L. DRC3~'~~ ~ ~Y F. ~CM AFP~.`~ MARCH 30, U967 PJ~AV~~G CObIMESIOP3 RECOMa~~~~~~~ ~ENLAL OF DRON~~ 4%NI~ ~~~~Y 1~09~ CHANGL APPLIC;~~OK tTiiLLTt~~E rAMI~~ SUSFJ~~ to ~UMMS - FIlX ZD►21- 6? blag~~~ IS H~~RBY that t~~ Board a~ ~ommissloners ~pd~~~~ ~ounty, Vr~shington, will bold a public hoaring st I 1+00 e°clock A. 14a on Tu a~sday, May 2 a 1967,9 ~ ~~eir effice gn 4~~ Co~~ ~ourthou~~~ ~onstcm ths appea1 of &rv$a La ~rc&vn and Ray To L€i~~~ thag parUcnLax rcaeommea~~atlon of tho 5pc&-ane Couaaty Planning Commission dzi-ed March 30o 1967owhich d~nied the app18cat9on s~f &rvin L. Drawn and fty P. Lackey for a aone eliang+~ ~~m Muitf~le Famit~ Suburban t~ ~ocal Business on the fcUawing deserfbed ~pertY'd Bectim 17a Township 25 Wm Range 440 EWMa Nceth 100 feeY of the South 230 ~ the B 1./2 of the E 1/2 of Trect 144 ~ppartunity0 ~ ~~THER G1M that any pe~~~n lntemated may ap~~ said lEearing and p~~ent tgsUmariy mi~~er icr ot' against the r~commendation of t1~ ~nty f'lanning ~ommission as outilnE3d aboveo BY Or THE BOA~ID thi$S 13t1t C~ ay od %t-pl'ilo 1967. OHLAWD Clertc c~f the Board By - . - . . , ~puty MINUTE U March 30, 196 i ZONE CH~iNGE ZE-21-67 - MULTIPLE Fj'.MILY t.~UBURBrN TO LOCr:L BUSIN'ESS; GRO`,NN t'`.ND L..,-C K EY Plan.ung Commissiorl kecornrnendation; Dc:n~L. . ~L ; 3~ 1-►. Reasons: 1. The Compreliensive Plan indicates high density residential land use or specific business uses as permitted in the Multiple Family Suburban Zone for the north side Sprague Avenue frontage betweer... the commercial centers at :zgonne and University. The property in questton, if zoned Local Business { would be creatinQ a"sAOt zone" in the mfddle of existinq Multiple Family Suburban uses and zoni.ng extendinci from Farr Road to Balfour Road : P,1 so l e stabli shment of Loc al Busine s s zoning in this tion would set a precedent and open the entire Sprague ~venu : frontage in question to Commercial zoning. appro.cimately 120 feet to the east of the proposed pharmacy sitc is located an established Restricted Residential Zone at Spragu:: and VValnut Road. This next-to-the-highest-class residential zoning in L'"Jpokane County was established in 1965 by property owners on both sides of vValnut Road, between Sprague and Valle,; 'Way, who have repeatedly opposed busine s s zoning of any type near their singie family residential street. The Planning Commis - sion is of the opinion that the er,isting zoning classification, MultiplP F3mily Suburban, should be maintained, and that the property could be developed by business uses allowed in the present class3fication. 2. Surrounding land use i.s as follows: To the west across Sunder- land Road - a doctors' clinic; to the north - three new dup.lex units; to the east - single family residences; and to the south across Sprague Avenue - professional offices. It is reasonable to expect that the Sprague Avenue frontage at Sunderland Road could develop, as it has on the northwest corner, with a pharmacY operated in coniunetion with a medical or dental clinic, but not as a full range drug storc3 as lpermitted in the Local BusineCs Zone. - 19 - (c ontd . ) ZE-21-67 - TviULTIYLE F~.i-iiILY :~UBURfi:`.~.T T~ LGG~-~L B. General D, .t:.: 1. Lcc;:;tion: Section 17, Tovrn-,,ilip 25 N. , Rsnge 1 Y,EvvM . The North 180 feet of the South 230 feet of the E 1/2 of the E 1/2 of Tract 144 of i Oppartunity. , 2. T-ipplicants: Ervfn L. Brown East 11614 - 10"th ~'.venue ~pokane, `/Vashinc;~~,r: I an.: Ray F. Lackey North 1622 Farr Road Spokane, Vvashington 3. Site Size: 24, 411 square feet 4. Existing '"Zoning: Multiple Family Suburban, establishe~;. September 2, 1939 5. Proposed Zoning: Local Business 6. Proposed Use of Property: Drug store and professional offices 7. :ipplication of Zoninq Provision: Chapter 4.21, Sections 4.21.040-4.21.080 - 20 - s . ) ` DANIEL W. GIBONEY - dTTORNEY AT I.AW 803 Sherwood Building West 510 Riverside Avenue Telephone: MAdison 4-1319 Spokane, Washington 99201 Area Code 509 March 20, 1967 RECEIVED MAR 21 1967 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Spokane County Planning Commission Spokane County Court House Spokane, Washington Dear Sirs: I would like you to refer to the proposed zone change re- quested by Brown and Lackey for the corner of Sprague and Sunderland Road. The petitioners propose to change the zone from Multiple Family Suburban to Local Business. The hearing on this application is set for Thursday, March 30, 1967. Mrs. Giboney and myself request that this zone change be denied. Five months ago, at the request of all of the property owners except one, you upgraded a 22 acre area immediately adjacent to this proposed zone change from Multiple E'amily Suburban to Restricted Residential. This was a strong statement by the property owners in this area that they want no further erosion of the zoning under which they established their homes in this area. It is my understanding that it is the general plan of the commission that the business activity be confined to the area between Sprague Avenue and the railroad tracks to the south. It is our feeling that the proposed drug store should be located in that area. The present zoning would allow the establishment of inedical and dental clinics at the proposed site so the proposed professional offices would not require a change in the present zoning. Trhe proposed zone change is not necessary to provide a location for this business activity. The refusal to change the zone would not work a hardship on either the petitioners or their potential customers. ry truly yours ~ 0 Daniel W. Giboney dwg:mf OFFICE WA 4-1120 DR. BEI.KNnr, nES. AL 5-6636 DR. MACNEILL, RES. WA 4-2723 . DR. LARSEN. RES. WA 4-2322 . D. E. BELKNAP, M. D. C. G. MACNEILL, M. D. J. D. LARSEN, M. D. PHY5ICIANS wND 5URGEDNS EAST 9807 SPRACiUE AVENUE D15HMAN. WASHINGTON February 21, 1967 County Planning Cotmaission 1116 Broadway Spokane, Wash. Gentlemen: This letter is mitten in regard to the proposed change of zoning on the N.E. corner of SunderlQnd & Sprague in the Spokane Valley. First, let it be understood that we are against a zoning change enywhere betWeen Farr Rd. - and the fire-station. This has been an understanding Por rnany years on thia side of the street, an understanding given to us by the County Planning Board in the County Court House. Ibave personally been told that thie sontng would never be ahanged. I am certainly not against a nice looking building on that corner and would be willing to agree to the following con- ditions : 1. Simply a variance be granted to build a drugstore. No zoning change. 2. That a brick vaneer building be built. 3. That the set-back from Sprague would be at least as Par as our building (N.tiR. corner of SunderlAnd. ) '.7e have worked and spent a great deal of money tu make our section of Sprague attractive. We would hope that this entire area► mentioned previously could be kept as attractive. Sprague as a zPhole is an unattractive hodge-podge of mixed zoning and this is one of the few remaining areas where some planning could be carried out. Y trul D. E. BELKNA.P, M. D. ' (HARLES G. Me cNEILL, bi. D. DEB : ap - 1 zE-21-67 In the matter of a hearing to consider cha.nging the zoning map from Multiple Family Suburban to Local Business on property described as the North 180 feet of the South 230 feet of the E 1/2 of the E 1/2 of Tract 144 of Opportunity in Section 17, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. (North of Sprague Avenue and east of Sunderland Roa.d AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SSCOUNTY OF SPOKANE ) beirig .first. duly sworizi9 deposes and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, ar.d now is, a r;-Lz.lzen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over• the age of twer,7y-one years. ; That on _ ~7 , 19 ~ne perscnally po sted three (3) true and correc copies of the hereto attached 1VOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wite I 1 r 20 f~ f ~ (1 3. ► ~J - ~w~ 4~.` ~ L~ L~ . . ~ Subscribed and sworn to me , ~ 19 C. ~ . l NOTARY pUBLICI~N AND ~oR SPOKANE COUNTY9 WASHINGTON Residing dt Spokane, WashirZai.on, _ J MARCH AGENDx SYO'i~N'E C01.7T1TY COURT HOUSE SPOKAi\1E COUNTY PLATN^'J:I~,,TG COi-'`i'i_iSSIO'i FA 8-1551, Ext. 220 - 221 Time o i'hursday, iIarch '30, V)h? 00 .1:.. Place : A~ ~~~,,ibl,y Room, Cour'. ZONE CHA: 7. a. Location: Section 17, Township 25 N. 9 "L~1i-19~- `41+, The North 180 feet of the South 230 feet o:i tiit: E 1/2 of the E 1/2 of Tract 144 of Opportunity. b. Applicants: Ervin L. Brown and Ray F. Lackey E 11614 - 18th North 1622 Farr Road Spokane, Wash. Spokarie, Washington c. Site Sizee 24y411 Square feet d. Lxisting Zoning: Prultiple Family Suburban, established September 2, 1939 e. Proposed Zoning: Local Buszness f. Proposed Use of Property: Drug store and professional offices g. Annlication of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040- Section 4.21.080 , d ~d 0 . ; . ~r w.qY ~ VALLEY _ WAY /t/OJ~T N -v--AC~~ J LA LC ~ I - 'VLS l J G ~ ~ iIlAI N Z ~ Q . , c;, - ~ . - - • _ , ~ - t~5 cPR/'~ AVENtJG - 7 ~ :.P 11 (o f~rvi n Z. Ar o w n -CJ. S. VALLEY PROFESSIONAL BUILDING EAST 9622 SPRAGUE SPOKANE 63, WASHINGTON WA 6-0218 1'~. c'i lv° a r c n , Spoxarie Count,y Plan:iinF, C,rrr,.f.istiion Court House Snokane 1, Washington rie: Request for zonin~, chanEe ar variance. Trie i~ortn 1P0 t'eet of the South 230 feet of the E 1/2 of the E 1/2 nf Tract 144 of Opportunity,-except county road, in Section 17, Townshin 25 N., Ranr_-e 44, E.W.Y. Gentlemen; Our request for a zone change is in accorctance vrith our i:l'ormation as to the proper procedure and requirements for building a drug store on this property nevi zoned for multi-ple i'Gnily suburban. '.'We i_-ave tr~crour:i,1~- car:-tiTa:.~sea ti:~e are-. ~vyti~-~ n 409 feet ar;a nave rnet with no strenuous ob jections to a well-planned, well-desi~-ned, attractive nra ject s~.~c'r: as we w^uld bui17. The only "cb jection" heard was fror, Dr. 13el'%.r.ap as seen in, the attached letter, wYierein he states a"variance" is acceptable to him but a,zone change is not. Our only interest is to obtain legal qualifications on the property to build the drug store. The zoning is already adequate for the prc- poseci professional units and whether a"variance" or zone cnange is issued is purely academic from our standpoint. The setback and building requirements as stipulated by Dr. Belknap are, (while probably not anything we cannot live with), some- thinE far better determined by the zoning requirements, architect, costs, and owners, rather than the neighbors. The proposed project represents a substantial invest- n:ent by tne parties involved, and would be a prominent 2dc~-1- tion to the area alre2dv somewhat devel^ced intc a pro- i'essional atmosphere. Than.~_ for yaur• cideration. S' c ely, , ' Ervin L. ro-vvrl D. D. S. Ra~,~ : . Lac-',_ey LL ~ . e 4w . , . ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Court House, Spokane 1; Washington APPLICATION FOR LOCAL BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL ZONE PART I: Information to be furnished the Planning Commission with an application for a Zone Change to Local Business or Commercial o 1. Development Plan - a scale drawing of applicant ° s property and surrounding streets showing : a. Size, number, and type of proposed establishments; " b. Off-street parking and loading areas proposed; c. Proposed access and egress points (curb cutsl; and d. Landscaping, screening, or fencing proposed. Z Economic analysis indicating the need for the proposed development which is to include - a. Type and size (square feet of sales space) of each establishment to be built within the area proposed to be zoned; b. Number of spaces of off-street parking proposed; c. Estimate of annual sales needed to support each establishment; d. Location of and distance from nearest competitive faci.li.ties; e. Estimated market area of establishments within area proposed to be zoned (indicate on a map showing the vicinity of proposed zone change); and f. If estimated market area includes competitive facilities ~ indicate percentage of sales expected to be received by proposed facilities. 3. Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, thei.r address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. PART II: Date: March 10. 1967 Application No. Name of Applicant: Ervin L. Brown and Fiay F. Lackey Ti_~(~~~ , Street Address: 11614 E. 18th (I3rown Res. ) City: -apQkaState: WARhi gt~n Telephone Number: Wa 4-0345 Home wa 6-o21b Bus. Existing Zone Classification: tqu= l P Fumi 1y Suh>>rhan Date Existing Zone Classification Established: , Proposed Zone Classification: T n[+al Riici nPCC , n,r vsari 8nr+p y;_.c, • Proposed Use of Property: Drug Store and Profess onal tini_r,,3_ No. of Acres;Y~ • 559 ~ - l Lega] Desc.r.iption~ of Property: The North 180 feet of the South 230 feet of the E 1/2 of the Eel/2 of Tract 144 of Opportunity, except C O L:-'"]. ty y' Oad. . , ~ ~ . Section. ~ Tow n s h? p: Ra t1 gP : Street. Address of Proper_ty; 9800 rilock 1;ast ~-Pra,~ u,_ T . ' : . T,;r. La.cke,Y will purchase ataley interests cbCr ~..z proposed Drug Store. A SKETCH OF THE AREA PROPOSEIa FOR A ZONE RECLASSIFICATION MUST BE ATTACHED WITH THIS APPLICATIONo THE SKETCH MUST BE ON A SC,ALE OF 1" = 400- Maps may be secured from the County Engineer's Office, Cour.t HousP, -~LL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWFRED: 1, What are the changed conditions whzch are alleged to miarran.t athe,- or addirzonai zoni.ng: The pr8posed Drug Store is a business relocatio:;. The present lease expires July 1967.1'1~There is a need for more parkin!~ and more Pha-Yrm_ aceu a a 1e5M ;ro ;eneral area (Dishma.n) would be served in the -i,rcposed location. preft-tasional JL.-d.JT-La-~- - , o st of which would be relocation of existing practices, due to ex,,; rebnrs 1 PAQPC anti the ni-g,d f'nr mnrP r, »:pZi-3:-3 -d wnrlri nr,~ art?o 2. What facts justi.f.y the proposed zone rPCI. ass.lf:: c-.at.ion based on thr- aavan.cemPnt of the public health, safetye and general welfare r `-ne Drug Store could more adequately serve tcl~ area, with increased parking, easier access, and i_~~ ~~asad faciliti::s. 3. What effect W ili1 r r.E? pr oj~OSP_.d zonF= 1 FC 1 c3S S l i'. C cf.10n htci wP n'"' 01P Vc11 liE' aT1C( c"r-)aT-act.er of adj acent property": Adjacent Property va.lue could only increase UL.e tne nature and va.l.ue of the proposed pro ject . ! . 4. Can a reasonable return from or reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification3 No. Property is too expensive to build ppartments etc., with a reasonable return, and too many professional units would have to be built (and occupied) to effect a reasonable re -UL<rIi. A FEE OF TWEN'I'Y-FIVE ($25.00) DOLLARS MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATIOlVe ANY APPEAL FROM ACTION OF THE COUN'I'Y PLANNING COMMISSION MUST BE PRESENTED IN WRITING TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION „ ( gned} I I I . ~ « . y ,.;Oun~~ Court Hout, ~ ~ , ra ~tL+a~ ~''~p", ii~~c~~~~s~c~rled pr~~vv~. ~ y ~qu t~ iyi'"S-aT~`i.a~ a z.59nlng !"'lali4) S-4aL (to kto8isid15ir bhF2ngina i?.(j t`i :I ~ } ~ 7ii Multipl€: Farnily Suburban Local Business 'LPhe Ncarth 180 feet of the South 230 feet af thc E 112 0f tne caf -r;ract 14~'~ of Jgportunity, excegt county rrad, in Section 17, Towwrnship 25 N., R.ange 44, r+.. w = NA.~ ~D R E 5~: LEGAL DES~RIP'~IO,~ OF PRO~UR, '1 J D ,f (,Ze ~ d l~! r f . l ~ ~ ~~~,T (1-,~ If.~ ~ 1Ji ~ ~ ~ ~,f~-~',;"..•t.c.~' ~ ~ ' 14 ~ . 4 )4v, .Wj ;`1$oa -,~'c'`'`/` _ - - , ~ _ ~ ~ - ~ ~ . - _ - _ ~ _ 4s.~ ~ rsI ~z c~f-t.~'J) 3 Oq- 6- t-- ~ ~,,L~ ~ i_ ~ `f V E jC C L) 2 z 1' 2" - Y ~ ~ ~ ~e xc- ezo~.~s ~ WT A ~ - - - - . _ r _ _ ~r~,.~.. ~ . . _ ` _ . _ _ . . . . . - - - - - - -J- - _ J `U cf -r~_ ~°1L C' 4 C 5 C- If4 Z ~ z z 61 ~ 'i. _ ~ ' P )4 c 1V iG, f( 7 , [-J' ~ ~ . a ~-IL Tr w~ izjl u CH ` 44-o,, er cq7li W-~. ~ . ~l w~ ~ C~/ Z 5 C~ ~ ~,~'YG-,~',]-~ ~ _ _ It~ `~!'~._...~i _ z o .~_J--~ q -L60F 1~'s 0 F F- 0 1 ?tJ ,~f a~ wp ~ , - ~ . <<~- ~ f-- ►U 0 U) (-6J ~ . 0 ~(TO e~ . rs ,'Fr -ex" t (4W {iu ~i► ~ ~~,t E Z. /~l~t~• -Z ~ '1 -Z, a f v`' ~ ~ ~"2 pz c- w 3 o u Se)t c~~ 97- F4- ZZ X c ► ~ ~ v ra loo . ~ co-~ 2 ~ - ~ ,v ~ _ ~ ~•s~~~~~~v~- _ ; 5~~ ~e x. c I rvvu+~~ k) ~,o Ft ,4U L C. /Ut i+ t.~ ~ S ~ ~ Tr-a c ~ ~ ~ ~!1 rV ~-r e- ( ~ I ~ ; r .___....____~__M____..-----•--_~~ .4 _ . - _r.._.._...~_.__.__ ~ __~___~..3._______~__.~. _ _ . _ _.~4~_~_.._. . _ • - -_.t.. _ ~ ~ 5 + LIST OF O vVNERS jiND PERSONS PPYING TAXES ON PROPERTY Spokane County Code Number 7_j- -A 6 7 Owners and Persons wfthin feet Applxcatfon is for a Certlfic,ation of Title Company I hereby certify that the following list oi~name and addresses consisting of this and the foliowing pages has been prepared from the latest avaiiable recards and is to the best of my knowledge correct For gIONEER I~ATIQNAL TJ.,T~„LE IN$_, CO o /",~2,9~ Sf g ned by ; (Tftle Campany) ` Date ~ z 19 G-7 . o .I Lr,~T GR1'~NTEE IN CHAIN DDITION i OF TITLE (O) AND fiDDRE SS LOTS ~ PERSONS PAYING TAXE S (T) ~ p Part c,f Block 144 of Opportunity ( ~ ~ T - El 26o f E'~ o f exc 144 ~ , O Mashken, Inc t ~*f t & exc~ Cl OD r ` s53ft~of N313 exc _ T Lincoln lst Fed S& L L 1112963X f,t~f E,~ of E~~ \ W25ftBlkl ~ ~ ~ ~ S 54 95 f t of N ~ T Llncoln lst Fed S& L L 11129648 367 95 ft of E2 0f r . t2 exc w ;e7 rz ~ U), ~ Blk 144 ~ ~o ~ S 53 f t of N~20 05 T Lincoln lst Fed S& L L 11129656 ft of E21of E2 exc w eD i L O T 0~._' Ervin L o Brovm & N f t 180 of E ft 2 of of S 230 Norman E Staley G~''/ 0 &jae~ E2 144 ~ TErvin L. Brown , E 11614 18th ~ W 110 ft of E 125 144 O Dona ld E Belknap Fas t 9807 Spragu e f t af W2 exc N 4blft&excRR j ~ - ~ ; w = oz Z2 exc !v ' 160 ft & exc E 2 144 i J (Continued on next page) ~',f LAS1~_GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION NOTXCE OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK MAILED PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) &s97fto~ 144 the N 461 f ~ r ~ ,,-i of Tr T Donald E. Belknap East 9807 Sprague (of above described DroDermies ) T, Dv Q~'P/Pmdp W 58 ft of E ,0incoln lst Fed-S& L--------L-10911 65143 5~~c~~ 73 ft of W1 exc Tv 461 f t 1~~ ~ 8c ex c R/W S 120 f t of _ Michl Feuersinger ~ Box 868 Great Falls, Nk~nN 2~-4 ft of (-0 ,I of 144 T l ~ S2 of N 160 s Clifford V. Belknap ~ N. 117 Sunderland Rd it of W2 of 144 --------------T--___.__----------------------E2 of, exc E 25 f t T % ✓ S 90 ft of N _ George C Hanson N 116 Sunderland Rd 260 ft of EZ _ - of E- 144 _ ~ & S go f t of E2 of E2 exc Rd - ~ 230 lmer H. Mitchell_ N. 10~+ Farr Rd o S 36~ 120 ft f t W2~ of P§ k4/ of 144 T ✓ O Albert Fo Christensen N__122 Farr Rd wl ~1 f4 ft of 144 YT ' I t~0 ft of 0 Ra mond W Amos N 121 Sunderland Rd o of 2 E 2 E12 exc 5 f t of 144 T 2 Tr 224 exd pCharles Hammond Box 153 Dishman, Wn 150 ft & xc N 200 f t 224 T f W1772f~ rf6 ) 2 of W2 & E O Sam J Schlosser E. 10000 Sprague 0 ft of N 01 8 ft of 224 -^---l-- T w-;'F of W2 W 200 f t of ----Jay Flower Co 9 corp o w 166 ft of ~ N 200 f t f--- EZ of tra c t 22~ T Fid el i ty S& L W F 18277 y~ 177 2 f~ of E,1) 5 ti LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION NOT3CE OF TITLE (O) AND AT)DRESS LOTS BLK MAILED PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) W2 o f W2 ex c Channon P. Price ~ E 9908 Sprague E 20 ft of N 301 8 f t 224 T ie R~ Riegel` Y'E 2921 3nd Apt 19~~W1 of E12 exc - - 2 - N 20 f t 237 ~ Cecil Whipplb & ' DonalJMa ck~e E 65 f t of i y N II►l4 1'@ S S HWy 237 T Lincoln lst Fed S& L L 11682 E 0_ Ja ck E. Grayer J_ 604±3 38 t SW W2 of S2 of ~ - - Tra c t 237 W 6o f t of P Juanita M. -Dapen__laLLV~7/G~-- ~ 190 ft of ~ Q~ NW 1 ex c S ~ lg9 8ft& w 65 f t of E 130 f t of T Old National Bk Greerlacres Br (Hendrickson ) N2 of W2 of 237 , NW; exc E 100 O Ralph-- Ro- Abee / f t& exc S - `"198 8 feet of, 237 ~ ALSO the S 3 f+ NW ; Tra c t 237 - exc E 130 f ~ - 2112 52nd Avenue N, 1 X_l Mrs Jack Cuendet St Petersburg, Fla NW~, exc E 1 0 198 8 f e e t exc W 60 f t of E190 ft& j~ exc Hwy tr~ct 237 3350 Wilshire Blvd ~ 2 Texaco, Inc (Lse )L6s Angeles, Cal j same as aboNe ' Cz f ' S 198 8 f t f ~_3 Mr Magic Car Wash E. 902 Sprague 1 E 222 ft & exd ~ S 20 ft f/14 W 92 ft of Herman E& J Hendriqkson S 2222 Balfour Rd E 222 ft of S 1 yCS 8 I-Z O I . NWu & S 20 f t of NWiv ~ lyg W of E - p?7 f fi , ~ I.,AST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION NOTICE OF TITLE (O) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK MAILED PFRSONS PAYING TAXES (T) Aa uI'v) ,,Aa, r rt r~ o la p I «n S 200 f t of ~ Delbert-Corporation N 220 ft of E2 of E2 exc T Lincoln 1 s t Fed S& L L 16045 W 30 f t 237 E2 of E2 tr 0 Est of Ole Johnson Exc N 220 ft ~ ~ exc Roada 237 D~r Henry We i t z E 9818-Spragu e I O _ OpDortunityv_Plat No,_z_I T O L!ynn J__Brownson _E_ 1234 S2raue S2 lot 4 6 ~ T - 1 O_ Myrtle L,~ Wri~ht r/L,(_ (aN2 lot 4 6 , T Kyrtle L Higgins w ~ (0-4 y 0 y - - - - O Alfred E Hausfeld N 20 Walnut Rd Lt 5 6 • + 1 ' O Daniel W Gib--- oney_______ S2 1 t 3 7 ------I ~ T Eac lst Fed S& L L41 1 771374 7 I LarryGuthrie________ ~g L~ NZ lt 4 , - , j T, Spokane Valley S 8c L L I P 2492 ~ Bessie L. Kilgore S2 lt 4 7 ~ ~ T Mrs Edward S Kilgore N. 105 Walnut Rd, , . , 3 ~ O_ G1 enn W Kl v e t t______ E 192 f t of - N2 1 t 5 7 , Sherwood & Roberts, Inc B R F 11567 4 John W 4_&Iion E. 11300 Sp:La u e L Op~or t_ E 180 f t of - S2 lt 5 7 ~ T ' Est of Madge Wilkin Lt 5 exc E ----------e_~e~~--------- 192 ft of N2 7 1 T Harman Clay Exec ~ K 2 11610 Valley Way Dishma 1& exc e180 ft ~ . , _ _ . . . - - - - - wi'Y - . . _ . ~.,g,e...~2 _ . . . - - - , c~►'. % ~.f'e c . .I 5 ~ ~ ~ _ _ 1-_ . ~ _ . : _ _ ____J _ _ 1_ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ ~O- i~~ I I I I i~+/2./ ~ a ~ , ~~IK F D(~ T~"o~t~ s° w cA Iv I~ I ~ I I ,,i _ J I ~ ~ ~ - l ~ . _ I~ I I I I~- h N _ ~ I- 8 I rm w ~ b , I I I . . I ~ I _ . L _ ~ ~ ____L~1~.~ ~ ~ ~ .f Y N~ ~.~.L~ _ e ~ L.___~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~8 ~~A ' ~~o L , ~ ~ I ~ f o~~ L _ : ~ I~~ ~ ~ I ; ~ I r ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ t- ~ 4~?_ 7 ' ~ ~ _ _ ` ~ ~a1 ~cs ~ 8°~ - a ~ ~ h h ~ I~ { 4 . -~35,__ _ _ i- I b , ~ h-- - `l - $ ~ ~1_~ ~ r ~ ~ r _ _ -~h N ~ 7 __L________~__ ~g ~ ~ 4 $ _ B~~IVlSION 1 _ _ ~ ~ Ih ~ ~ ~ In, ~ „ i ! _ _ ~ ~ a p8 I~ ~ D W _ ~c`' ~ l. . ~ ~ ~ ' i~ ~ i ~ ~ n~~ „ "'r ~ = ~ " ~ ~h ~ ~ _ ACT 98 ~ ~ r , . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ g h ~ ° C~ ' rK h , ~ ~ ~ ? + ~ ~ e~t - ~ +4f ~c - ~-j ~y ~ ~~~f,~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ 4 ~ l a~~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ' I ~ ~ ~ ~ „;e 1 I--- ~ w ~`i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f~~ { ~ a,~ ~ ~ a . I _ _ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ - ~ ~ . - _ ~ . - , .i ~ , ~ I ~ o b ~ I ~ ~ ~ + I ~ . I ~ ~ ~ ~ JI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~o~- ~ a ' r, - T. ~ _ _ .f _ _ _ _ ~ , _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ / ~ a t~' I ~ ~ ~ ti ~ a ~ a _ ~ ~ i --~--Y--- ~ ~ ~ I ~ . ~ ° ~ , 4 ( _L ~ , , i a-~ , ~ T~ ~ , . ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ aq ` - ~ ~ _ ~ ~S : ~s" ~ ~ c '1 ~ l ~ ; G v ~ ~ 1 ~ r' r~~ ~ : , t , i~ ~ • ~ y~ i Z~' _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ .3c:'f e ' .J% ~5+~ ~ ~ ' 7 [!1a'7~► =?!-dI - -~s - - - - _ _ _ _ i.. _ on ~ le ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i .,?a~.2d►` ~ ~ ~ I ~ ` ~ I i;~ ~ . I I h`~ ~ !~-z ~ ( ~ ' : ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ...,~.~0 ~ r i io ~ ~ I ~ I ~ 'r ~ ( j° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l 1~ ~ ti _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ~ _ _ a~~ _ I ~ L 8~ ~ ~s~ _ y ~ 0 r ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ~ '4~ ~ ~ ~ ~J - ~ " _ ~ ; r ' r, s . , r - 1 I , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - _ ~ ~ ( b b ~ ~ b - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . .J f' ~ f ~i ziS .....r ; _ ~ ~ ~ , _ I f] I + ~ ~ ~ A R ~ ` . ~ ~ ~1 . ~ o ~ ~ ; ~ . ~j ~ - ~ _ - - - - _ _ _l _ . - - _ - ~ ~ ~ _ . _ ~ , oC ~ u -~o t; ~ ~ ~ ~ s~ ~ Q I'~ J i ~oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " r. ~ , ^ i I - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ , i ~ C f ! j~ j L~~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ r~~ ~ - - - - ~ ~ _ - _ a°~ ~ _ _ .1~ _ ~ i ~ ~ ~~~I' f ' ~ ~ , ~ , , p. . ~ ~ ~ 8 - - _ _ _ _ ' ` /'~4~ ~ a ` ~ . h ~ _ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ _ ~ ~ . b - r N~( i I~ 6i ~j i~ r r ~ti ~ id } ~ a1 ~ti J'~~ T e i ~ ~-r 5 ~ ~'7 I -rs. - - - - ~ r. ~ ~ I`~ ~ . \ ~a ~ `a I ~ ~J V ~ ~ ~ ~f~ I ~ ~ /id ~ ' " y I ~L_ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ _ r _ _ _ ~ ~ r~ ~ L ~ , ~ ~ ~ ti ~ , ~ . . , . i~~' ` ~ 1 , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , Y---_1..?~z - - - ~ ~5.:.~__..~~-_-~--- ?~1. ~ .:~ui~s " .i'vr.~s ~ ~ -~}¢O _ - i J- - ~ ,ff ' ~ ~ - - - ' . ~ ,y~',~ ~ ~ . . _ . . _ - ' prso ~ - ~ ~ You are her~b no#ifi~d, that on ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , at the hour of ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ • of said da in the S okan~ ~ou~ +~ourt Hvuse, S akane~ Washin ton, ]I p p 9 The St'+QKANE ~C~UN~Y PLANNINC~ C~MMISS~~N wil~ con- C~uC~' q ublic hearing to ~c~~ F~~~ ~ ~~~~~l~~~ ~~G ~+~4~~ ~~~~~i~~~, ~~+~1~,~~i~t~3 L. i~G~►'~~t, ~ ~ - )~~'~t ~1~1~~~'~, ~1~~ ~ ~ ' ~1A~i~'~`, ~fl~l~ !`A~~~ ~RCa~A+~,~ ~l~~,~~'~,~ ~~~$~~'~'~~'~i , ~t ~'~i~lO~E~ ~k~~ ~"~~~i~~~~#~A~ ~7~~i~t'~1~ d~'SCrI flf~n a'~ ql~~q: ~~~►~~r ~ t~at ~ ~ ~ ~~t r~~ t~t~ ~ ;~l~ +~t ~c~+~~ +~~~ar~~~~~t ~+~+ati~~~ t~~ '~q►w~1~~p r R~t~~• ~4~ ~ ~ ~r ~~F~~t~~~ C~o~t~~~►, ~e~M~~~~~~. ~t ,~~r+~~s~ a~~~ ~~~t ~tt ~~~t~~~~` ~+o~~.~ FUR FURTHER DETA#L5 cvnt+act #he S okane Coun '~lann~n P ~Y ~ Ca~mission, S okane Ca~un Court ~House, S okane, Wash. P ~]f ~ pirec#or of Planning F 4 II M 8 4 8 P L M G C Q M M. 3~ 6 5 Spokane Coun~ Planning Cvmmission ~ RETURN IN & DAYS TO JU SPOKANE COUNTY aPos M~VItl'IVi7 CQ1~1~~1I~75IOItl COURT HOUSE SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99201 ~z 05 Mfi7ER 391574 c Moved "'ft nO ad - I~~o such dre~ ~"oved ~~mb~~' , not forwardabis C~ AddrzSSee unk... Robert Mo tgomery - E 6517 4th Ave f~ Ei I,~ r, L~~~'~ , Spokan , Waslungton t tJ ~ u ~ ~ I'~ Cij w R~1L R %y~oa