PE-1209-78 & ZE-92-78
6f-_~ao ~ ~0
r FILE .
~.r . ' . • : . . r ` ,
, + o.' 'l ,i • 1' . . ~ I \ 1 \ / \
J ' ' ( t• " ~ ~ ~I ~ 1\ I ~'di / ~ \
rfA~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ i- +i - • .
A'
; ;
T -
STAFF REVIEW OF E~TV~3.ONM, ~NTAu C KECKLI T
SPOtt4NE COUNTY COURT NOUSE
I, In accordance with the Spokane Counoty Environmental O!-dinance and WAC 197-10,
an Environmental Cizecklist has been submitted by the applicant or hfs agent.
This checklist and any additiona.l pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed
by the t
The following data briefly describes the proposal:
A, Action (s) Requested: AZ Zone Change; ~?reliminary Plat
Approval: t-~Final Plat Approval; Change ot Condition
0 ther:
B, Descriptio roposal:
~
Location of Proposal. . ~
~ `~o~. ~
II, Review of Checklist:
A. Slight adverse impacts arn noted under the following questfans:
(1) ~Earth (8) k"Land Use (15) Energy
(2) ~ Air (9) Natural (lo) ✓ Utilities
Resources
(3) -k,Water (10) Risk of (17) LIuman
Upset Health
(4) P" Flora (11) P"Population (18) Aesthetics
(5) Fauna (12) ~ Housing (19) Rec.
(6) ~ Noise (13) ~ Trans./ (20) Arcz./
✓ Circ. Hist .
(7) Light & (14) V Publir (21) Other
Glare Services
~w
, - v
el
B, Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following
que s tions :
C. Discussion of impacts identified above:
III, Conclusions and Recommendations:
Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff:
A. L--"'Concludes that there are no potentially slgnificanC adverse impacts
and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance.
B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts
and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends/issues a
final declara tion of nonsigniiicance.
C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and
recommend s/is sues a declaration of significance.
78
ECFm I VEr
X ~ r .
r . '.t • r
. ~ . SPOKAN _ COUNTY
L A N IR-G QFp n :
y,~ ' ~ ,
~
` t ' ►sl d • ! r
~-',est• ..ai;~u~ uu . a!
SPOKANC COUMtr cOUNT MOUS[
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW,
requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values
both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals, The Act also requires
that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared fo: all major actions significantly
(and "adversely", as per VdAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The
purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your
opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be
aware of and concern themselves Lvith the dearee of impact, asking you for more informa-
tion, if necessary. 'AThere explanations of your answers are required, or where you
believe an exnlanation would be hel.pful to government decision-makers, include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional paqes, if necessary. You should
include reierences to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are
relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now wiil
help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental
review without unnecessany delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which
you are cur*ently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by you: proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future ,
No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned
to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "ves"
and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required
to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information
to aid in a threshold determination.
NOTE: This is a standard farm being used by all state and local agencies in the State
of Washington for vari ous types of proposals. Many of the questions may not
apply to ycur proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and
continue on to the next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I. BACKGROU\TD
1. Name of Proponent: mran~~.r~~+-e~~ ~o~ 1+t> Bren.t McKinl~v
2. Adclress and Phone Number of Proponent:' N1014 Pines Rd. Suite 3,
Spokane, Wa. 99216 922-0702
3. Date Checklist Submitted:
4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County, Wa.
5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable:
South Adt,:ns Addition
- 1 -
6r - ~z o 78
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS IiVADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
6. Nature and Brfef Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, •
general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under-
standing of i-r_s scope and nature):
C:rPat;nn c)f oij 9_6 acres in aentlv slopina land
in the Snokane ValleY. Soils underlyina the project
are mnderately to excessivelv well drained and suitable
fnr ce_P.tir tank drai nfiel d nPrrnlat-iQn. (GCtB)
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as we1T as the
extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other
information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting
of the proposal) :
Thi cz~rPa j-z hr.uindP.r3 by housi na Qn -h _ nrth . Snuth and
West w'ith semi -taast 7r _ arP_ t-Q thP
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal:
1978 .
9. List of aIl Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal
(federal, state and local - fncluding rezones): '
Plat - Spokane Countv Plannina Cqmm/3Qard of rQ_ rnm_
Roads- Spokane Countv Enaineers
Septic mank - Spokane County Health niqtr;r_t
Building Permits -Spokane Co. Building Department
10a. Do you,or the awner tn the event you do not own the subject land, haue any
plans for future additions, expansion, or further activit f rel3ted to or con-
nected with-this proposal? If yes, explain:
No
lOb, Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's
location? If yes, explain:
~
11, Do you know of any plans by others lncluding the otvner which may affect the
property covered by your propesal or !and adjacent or nearby? If yes, expialn:
No
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the'proposal;
if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date,
describe the nature of such application form: -
None .
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
, -Yes tilaybe No
~ -
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in gealogic
s tructures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering
of the soil? , . , , , , , , , , . , , , , , . , x _
~ _ _ 2
~
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Maybe vo
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x _
, (d) The destruction, covering or modiffcation of any unique
geologic or physical features ? , . , , , , , , , , , X
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either
on or off the site ? , , , , , . , , , , , , , , , v_ X ~
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may
modify the channel of a river or s tream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ,,.,,,x
Explanation: Construction of buildings and roads will necessitate
chanqes in topoaraphy in nearly every square foot of the plat.
However. landscanincr should re-establish stable soil conditions.
Y€a Maybp-. ED
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? X _
(b) The creation of objectionable odors ? . . , , . , . , . X
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in ciimate, either locally or regionally? X
Explanation: Additional housing in this area will result in
increased traffic; however, a portion of this increase will
simply be a relocation of emissions sources and`the net
increase will be incidental to-the overall metrQpglitan are..a-
3. Water. Wiil the proposal result in: Yes Ulzybe No
(a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters X
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface water runoff x ~
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters X
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water
body ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(e) Dfscharge into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? X
(f) Alteration oi the direction or rate of flow of ground wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ~
(g) Ch3nge in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? X ~
. . . e . . . .
(h) D-aterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate,
phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria,
or other substances into the ground waters ? , . . . X
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
Explanation: Increased -QOgulation wi thi n th is rorn i Prt arPa uri 1 1
create additional demands on the water supply svstem. Much
of this demand is sim2ly a relocation of the demand wi#11,i
the metropolitan area.
~ -3-
(IF SPACE FOR E7CPLANATION IS INADEQURT~,_ PL£ASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES, )
Yes UIavbe No
4. Flora. Will the proqosal result in:
(a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? . , , , , . , , X
(b) Redu ~-,tion of the numbers of any uniqu-, rare or
endangered species of flora? . , , , . . , , , , . , x
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to rhe normal replenishment of
existing species? . , . . , , . . , , , , , , , , x
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop X
Explanation: _ThP pja_t ;Q economicallv unfeas i bl e as a_aricul ural
qround. It is nresent„].y in mPC3ium tn noor naAt»rP ,,,rhi ch wnil d
_,L,P Z'Ql)1 n
Yes Maybe No
5. Fauna. V1Ti11 the proposal result in: ~
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . , . , , , , , , , x
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or -
endangered species of fauna ? . . ; , . , , . , , , x
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an are3, or
result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . X
(d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? x_
Exnlana:ion:
1'es Mavbe No
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?, X _
Explanation: From a"micro" point of view, noise levels will
increase. The extent of impact will be minimal and will be
_aartiaU..y aj2Lted q-Lo o
,rnamental shrubs, trges apd VL.Sjntjncrs
create an accoLStical PffPr___ Yes Maybe No
7. Lic7ht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? X _
Explanation: Additional housing with associated night lights and
automobile lights will create more light and glare than is
presently produced from the site. The impact is insignificant.
Yes Maybe No
8, Land Use, VJill the proFosal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area ? . , , , , , , , , , X _
Explanation: Present- iisP will hP al tPrPd tn r~ci riPn'~1~3,1 LZS,,a
r-at-her
than existing vacant. This has no impact on the erivironment.
' - 4 -
~
i
~
.
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Mavbe No
9. Natural Resources . Will the proposal result in:
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources X
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? X
Exulana tion:
Ye s Maybe ND
10, Risk of Unset, Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation)
in the event of an accident or upset conditions x
Explana tion:
Yes Maybe No
11 . Population, Will the proposal alter the location,
distribution, density, or growth rate oz the human
population of an area ? . . , . . . . , , , , , , , , , X
Explanation: Much of the increase in population is a result in
relocation within the metropolitan area within the state or
within the United States. This will alter the population
densi ty of the r ject site but will hqve J.,ittle effect if anv
on the human population of the metropolitan area surrounding.
12. Housina. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or
create a demand for additional hottsing? , , , , , , , , , X
Explanation: The same answer from 411 above applies to housinq.
Yss Maybe No
13. Transoortation/Circulaticn. Will the proposal result in:
(a) Generation of additional vehicular movement ? . , . , , x
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for
new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? x _
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people anci/or goods ? . , , , , , , , , x _
(e)• Alterations to waLerbotne, rail or air traffic? X
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestriar.s ? . . , . . , , , , , , , , x _
Explanation: The concept of "micro" impact versus area wide impact
is important to understand in addressinq the transportation/
circulati on issue. Yes, the,, immed"te vicinit.v will be imnaci-Pd gomewhat,,, howPVPr, t-hP overal l met-rnDol i'tan a,rPa wi 11
not be impacted from a project of this size.
- 5 -
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
- ~ Yes Maybe No
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas ?
(a) Fire Protection? X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
(b) Police protection? . . . . . , . . . , , . , . , X _
(c) S chool s ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X -
. (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . . . . X _
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x _
(f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . , . X _
£xplanation: The local fire, school, and road district wi,ll be
impacted by additional housina, population and roads, U22
effect wi l be o_ffset- t-o Sor-nP dPgraP hy addi-i onal tax rQvP ir1 7P~
~nAra+-Arl
Yes Nlaybe No
15. Energy, Will the proposal result in:
(a) Use oi substantial amounts of fuel or ensrgy? ~
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the developmnnt of new sources of energy? X
Explanation:
Yes Maybe No
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities:
(a) Power or natural gas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
, (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . , x
(e) Storm water drainage? X
(f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . .
Explanation: Al1 ut-; 1i+-; Pq will be impacted; however,_Primarilv
throuQh extension of existina svStems rather than "new" or
altered systems. Se`,,rage di sposal (on-si te) anc3 ctQrm watPr
drai naa,e_(on-si tp-) wi 1 1 bP rWiii rP(9_
Ye s Maybe No
17. Human Health. Will the prooosal result in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health r-azard (excluding
mental health) ? . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
Explanation: The answer iq bagPd nn_aua; larlp fa ct~ an~ trP ~
o
of any definitive evidence one way or the other_
- 6 -
~
~IF 4JC`liL/li r VIS 1a11rLA1Vtil1C13E SL3 'LNADEQUAT£ ► PiJEASE ATTACH ADDITIO-iqAL PAGESs)
Ye5 Nldybe No
18. Aesthetics, Will the proposal result in the abstruction o#
any scenic vista or view open to the public for wzll the pra-
gasaT result a.n the creation a'J" an aesthetica~ly offensive site
open to public vfew? . . , . . . , . . . . . . . . .
~ ~
Ex,olanakion:
Yes Mayhe No
19. Recreati.on, Wi3.1 the iDropasal result in an irnpact upon the
quality or quankity of existing recreational opportunities x
.
Eacplanation:
I
I
Yes Mavbe iNo
20; ArcheolQciical/Hzstoricax. Wil1 the pro-oosa1 resuit in an - i
alteration of asignificant archeologicai or historfcal site, -
structure f object ar building? • • . . • rt . , • . • • . . x
Lxpianation; y
zzar, ~~GNATURE
I. the undersigned, svvear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are
made tivthfully and tea the best of my knowledgee I alsa understand that, shcuid there be
any willful mfsrepresentation ar willful lack ❑ f full dLsclosure an rny part, Saakane County
may wLthdraw any declaration vf nonsignificance that it mtght issue in relianca&--t~pon this
checklist, ,
i
(
Date: 5- Prvponent:
(Please Print or Type) ~
~
Propanent: Transweztern Realty - Bren.t McKinley
Address: N1014 Pines R.d. Suite 3. S-Dokane. Wa.~.
Phone: 922-0742
Person completing fvrm: Michael L. Senske
Phone: 924-3759
D a te :
Dept. or Office of Caunty Reviewing Checklist: ~
L1
Staff Member(s) Reviewlng Checklist: .
o j7}~ i
_7
.
EXHIB IT A
A c4~ PIRELL'41NARY PLAT A.PPLICA=fl '71M C 0 U;-J i'
C, D ~ P A ~i I`,'. E i ; -
s~asssss~~~sss~ssss*+sysys#s~ssa~ss+l~~~~~r~~ss*l~~~~~R~swM*rta*MSt*#*w~~s~~s*~+~w~~ ss*~*s~
Part I- To be completed by applicaat and surve3ror
AL-FA AND DISTA►VCE*~~.*:~.*~..#*•.~*.~..•~~..~......,~..~t,~~.~.*.~~.~~.,~**.~~..:*.....~:t.~~..*.:..~.~.
/2'5- G~
Total aiaount of laad in this Subdivi.aion: r1. 5'f Acrea Total Number of Lots
P:-opo8ed density of the Plat: B Lots/Gros9 Acre
Total asouat of adjoining land controlled by thia owaer or epoasor: mr-I Acree
Prcposes Use of controlled adjoin?n land:
What is the drivin.g distance in cai? es to the nearest fire atation?
Shogni3r, facilities? Mt:ai,cipal Bouadary: - Paved street ar ~
highr~ra~ ~ - ?
„A.,L II`7~+y~**~~s~*~IIS*~~sM#i*Ml~~~~M*sf~e!*~li~sis~sf~s~i~~lNis*~*s«~*s~s~s~~~i~~~~a4sM#/~srssaM*~s
iudicate the proposed land use of the plat: Single Fami1y Jurellings C X).
Duplexes Indicate lots for duplexss. ~~f.t k
Mulz:-family dwe111.ng un :ts C Indicate w'ti ch lots:
Mobile Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses:
Describe any aoa-resideatial use provosed in the 1:11at:
Wha.t is the prssent use of the property propoaed to oe p1.a ttad?
List tyne of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pastvre: acres.
2u+mber: acres. Vacant: acres. Other: Acres
s keeping of a.nimals des:Lred? No ( X). Yes ~ Type :
I I
Sr"Sr~S~VS~3:dl~l+►7*tRi~i~f*lM~siitt*lnR~~#*~Mr~ffflss#f~s~~~+Rsiilr~iiMMfsis~ti~~ts~~e~t~s*Ris*issRif**i*i*~~**~s#
Do ~ou plan to fi3e the P'_at in its eatiretv as propased, ar 1di11 =t. be a multi-pbase deve-
lopnent?
!
To what level of improvement wi.lZ streets be consiructed? Czravel C )-:u!=.~.-'
~urb and GraQel ( Curb and Paved Paved only C
Describe any combinations of above: ,
'aThat 4-s the tiQe meri od A=ected for comple te deve? otxneat o i the Pi_.a.i :
Street improvecnents completed? Substantial aumber of lota occuziad:__L~
Is dedi.catioa oz any land for public use conzempleted? (?arKS, schools, etc.)
No. Ye9 ( ) . Describe : ,
rnd; cate the size of uaita proposed ta be constz~cxeted: Sqv.are T ~
Number of bedroome - ;stimated Sale Price
WiL 'auildiags be bu:it on the lots before they are sold: No (X" Yes C
Wil,l any svecial deed restrictions be 3.acluded :.n the sale oi --ots' `io °es (
I~ "fes", explaia:
T~R1TTTrtTns~ss~#s~sM*ssf*rt+s~ssl~s~ss~r~~~~sr~s~,~f~t~is~a~ws~~~~aars~s,r~w~,~~ssrsssa~rss~rs~~r~fy
tJ ~ s.il.ira7
Znd:.cate t,he proposed meth.od of sewage disoosal: Septic tank Lagooa C
Treatmett plaat C Other, or combinations (Descr=be)
:adicate '-he Froposed saurce of watar sugply: Individual wells ( PubL:. 3ystea (,k
P: ivate coamur.i.ty system ( ) .
Indi.cate method of extending se:^rice to the lota (Dwe].liags) :
Underground utility easements C?< Overhead util:ty easements ~
Uti.l:.ties in strests ( No ea.9emests (
Indicate the distance irom this oropoea1. to tha nearest e:csting water main: feet
Iadicate size of nearest aa=n: -.ncnes.
. •
E X H I B I T A
PRFT-IlMINARY PLAT AP'FLICATION FOIN (Continued) page 2
QTILI TIE5 - (Continued}'~'~~«*f#~s+t*~~*ssss~~~~~MS~~~srrsssfsssi~rr~*sa~sss*s*rsr*ss~*+**•rssss*s
List utility compa;ailes or districts expected to provide service to this Plat:
Electricit . i , • Gas. y • Water : Phone :
ACIQY ,.5......~...~...w..s.•~...~..~:.~....*.....~..~;;.,...:............~..*........«...
PROPOSED PLAT NAME :
I. the undersigaed, have comp].eted the iaformation reouested, aad the Preliminary Plat has
aeea pre , .bv me under my sugervisioa ia accordan.ce arith the :equiremeats of the Spokane
Coun tment and the laws the Stat~ f Washin.gtin.
~ • s. ~
WA ~
. (Sigaed) ~Date:,j~;,-`
OF S j'•
. y~
. _
o: (Address) P:hflne :
z .
qo ;
167
Zip :
/~~9'•~;~ClS
•TER~~••
~ S~1
.
I, the un.dersigaed, swear uader the penalty af perjury tha.t the above respon.ges are
made truthflill.y aad to the best of my lnowledge. I also understan,d that, saould there be
aay willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane Count-1
map withdraw an9 decl,aration of noneigaificaace that it miaht issi:e in reliance L1pOII this
checklist.
,
(Sigaed) Date :
~
(Adc_re s s ) ,/C2 Phone : ~.Z Z o ;7
Zit):
NOTARY Date • ~
NOTARY SFAL:
* i i~~~ i tr i~* iR a* fi i# 7f ! s! i~~~i r i 7r f s~~* i~ f!~ i s~! ri 1M f~t iM +t f~ 71R t if 1t ~ y i* 1/ r 1~ 1* 1R f~ fM i ~ f* w M t 1/ ~ 1~ * I~ ! a*~ 1~ R■
Part TI - to be cornpleted by water purveyor
A. Th:.s subdivision (is) (tommt) sitvated wi.thin our aervice area.
H. We are (abla) C ) a.nd w311ing to suPPly this subdivi.sion wi.th adequa.te water °or
(domestic) (fire) C' ) Cee ) uses.
C. Satisfactory arraagement (ii~) (hop v ),.Qeen made to ser4e this gronosala
D. Sigaature (only whea iteme A, B&6e t:ue and completeci)
VE►2 NVL )t'i T E& ~~O ►v F~2 ~ ~ L l~ t t r Fi ~ 9 f~`~
-r - '
pur*reyors na:ae signa e title 3a te
•~«~f~~~Fl~~i;~~f~slilSit~lS~+~sssw*tltlsf~~«ft~~*t~t~►asf~*~ss*sr~y~ssrs~l~ls~asi~~~~+M~r~~~~s~~~~w,~
Part ?II - to be completed 'oy Health District
A. Health District requirsnents for prsliminary plats have ( been satisiied.
B. Siguature~
`
AI& .
eign,ature` aad title date
iswrs~sw«*s*~*:sas~~ssw#~s*ss*s~rss~~~~~rssss~#sss~rs~~*s1*~ssss~#ss~~+~sswsss*s*srssss**~ss*~r.r
- ~
.
. '
E X iiIHIT A
PRMi~~~ PLAT AP~JIV#iJ.IViY FVRM
. (CoYItiD.ued) P5,ge 3
~»++ss~ ~~+~~r~t~:~r**~e~~~~«~*■~rt~:*w.~a~***~.aa*.~rsr~r,~r~.,~~r*~r,rs~rr***~~~~~~~►~~~~a*~~wt~r~*~~ric.t~~rts~~*~
Part IV ~ to be camgleted by Caunt~ e-neers Office
A. ~~ty Enzi.neex-s Offi.ce requirements for prelzminaLry pla~ v~ehave not) been
aatisfied.
B. Signature
~ure aaa title date
#~~y1M~~r~ea~i~~w~ai~~~~ra~ss#~fes*#s~iiR~M~ia1t~4~~tM~~i!II~Mi*k~*~#~~a#,~s~**~*fM*~~+~~M*#~M**+M~R*~+1~i~~y+~~~~N~ri~***o#~
Part V to be campleted by County [itilities Dept.
A. Couu.~~ ~ti-iities Department requirements for greliminaa`y pla<hav~~ (have not) bee
ti.~+f~.+~ci -
~ 4r~ iw "-~T-z* ~~L.fb, f~w. / "
B. s 1 gnat~1~' e
~ ~
si;wture -And titie date
~~s~~~r~~~*~r**~*s#a~,~w~~~~*~~s.****~~,:.~~*ss::*~*=*s~~~:~.~e~~~*~~~.~~~~~..«~r~s~~~~*r.w~■~s~~*~~~~~~
This part 41-.a be -camnleted by F~rriag De-Dartment
P3annin..c; Demar=er~~ InforMation
Date 'ub~.itte~d; CY~ecke~l b~`: ,i~ ~
~
Schc~3. D3 st~ct 1I„_~ Y ~ #1!M Prelimi.nr~► F~.at ~'°ee ; ~
~
~ ~~~cklist Fee:
~
Zon+~ G~ge ~'c~.: D
F - ~
~'u~m'~er of Lats: ~ 7 A~averts.sed "oae Llpgr~.~mg:K
.
at Fi].e ~o. rl~'7r' Locatiara.; Sect~.on ~O '~a~s~.ip
154f
~ ,
te. 0
~~i~ D~.
Pla~ Name:
. t
_
.
- • . ~
~
N0.
aEFORE THE QOARD OF CGUNTY COP1h1I SS IONERS OF SPOKJINE COUNTY, 4JASHI NGTON
I N THE MATTER OF 7HE RECUNiMENDAT-IONS FROM )
THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANPJ 1 NG COMMI SS I ON ) RESOLUT I ON
CONCERPJING TNE COMMISSION'S AGENDA DATED )
AUGUST 25, 1978. _
WHEREAS, The Board of County Conunissioriers of Spokane County, pursuant to the provi-
sions of the Revised Code of Wash-ington, Section 36.70.620, shall upon r•eceipt oF
any recoirnnended official control or amendnient thereto, at its next r•egular public
meeti ng set the date for a publ i c meeti ng whcr•e 7 t,nay, by ordi nance, adopt or
reject the official control or amendment; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County ConiniissionErs of Spol:ane Caunty, did by RESOI~ition
No. 78 1181 acknowledge receipt of the recommendations firom the Spokarie County
Pl anni ng Conuiii ssion concerni ng i ts Ayenda, dated August 25, 1978; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Cor,imissioners of Spokane County, did by said resolution
set this llth day of Septeniber to consider the recomimer,dations of the Planniriy CoE>>-
mission concerning its August 25, 1978 Ayenda, a copy of said recornnlenda-tions arE
attached hereto and incorporatEd herein by reference.
NUt-!, TNFRtFORE, aE IT RESOLVEU by the Board of County Coiiuiii ssioners of Spokane
Courlty, Washingto*n, that based upon the information availablp. to the Board and the
testimony at th'i s mee'ti ng, i:he fol 1 owi ng acti on ti•1as taken :
A. 3. II(ZUPUSED A!`1ENUMLPITS 'fG 'tl-lC Sf!OR\'i PLAT URU1Nl1NCE I-1ND RELIITrLC FEC SCI-IEDiJLC:
The Board concurred with the Planning CoRUnission's recommendation to
approve the Aiitendiuents to thc Short Plat Ordinance and related fee schedule
as proposed. .
B. 1. PE-1011-76, S1Jr1N ACRFS FIRST IiDDITIOid
ZE- 59-76, AGRICULTURAL to SIMGLE FAMILY RESI[)FNTIj1L - Swan
The Board concurrf_i! :;ith ttie f'lanning Cor.nii::sion's recommNndat;ion to
approve the Extension of Time LG Septeinber l, 1979,
2. PE-1026A-76~ KENNEY'S_ cUGDIVISION #2
ZF- 781,-70, AGl21CULTURAL t0 S1NGLE FAMILY IIcSIDENTIAI. - Kei1rtey
The Board concurred wi th the Pl anni ny (:orimii ssi or.' s reco!iu>>endati on to
approve the Exterision of Tinie tu SepteiiibPr 1, 1979,
3. PS-111II-77, SOUTH kIDGE VIEW 5th ADGITIGy
. ZS- 114-77, l1GEZICULTI:fZAL SUE3U(Za/1N to 5I~JGl_E FAP1I1_Y RF-SIDCNTIfaL S:•rartout
The Board concurred wi th the Pl anni ng Coinmi ssi on' s r•~:r..ommenuati on to
approvc: the Cxtciis i on o f T i nie to Septc,:ibcr 1, 197 g..
4. PN-1129-77, FA1 FIlUUD CRFST NO. 7
ZN- 136-77, AG~'~I(;ULTURAL SU[3UIZCAN to SINGLC FltMIl_Y RES1DENT1i'rI-Jarrow Corzst.
The Qoard cor.currecl with the Planning Comni-ission's recoitimendation to
approve tfie Extcnsion of Tiine t:o Septembcr 1, 1979.
C. 5. PE-1141-77, P10UNTAl.id VIE4! MEl1D0Ul5-
ZC- 1E1-71, AGiiIUNI.TURAL to-S1NULE FAMILY_RCSIDLINITTAL_
I-iaviny f-ece-ived a com,uunication in disagr,ecment t•rith Lhe :')annin,~ Cc
siori's recoramendation for approval of a Change of ConcJitio+i fron: 59 to
only 24 lots, the Board referred the matter to-the planning staff and
tonk the requ-est for hearing on 26 lots under advisement.
--1-
i~o y
• .
r
41- i
D. 6. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN - Keto
Having received a communication in disagreement with the Planning Commis-
sion's recommendation for denial, the Board referred the rratter to the
Planning Staff and took,the request for hearing under advisement.
7. PE-1216-78, MOLTER ADDITION
ZE- 114-78, AGRICULTURAL & AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN to SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL - Transwestern Realty
The Board concurrred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to deny
the request for this preliminary plat application, for the reason as•stated
in the minutes of the Planning Commission hearing.
8. PE-1209-78, SOUTH ADAMS ADDITION
ZE- 92-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE - and TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - McKinley
The Board concurred with the Planning Coinmission that no action was necessary
on this plat application for the reason stated in the minutes of the Planning
Commission's Hearing, and that it should be continued on an indefinite basis.
E. 9. PE-1217-78, MICA MEADOWS
ZE- 110-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN - Zaracore
The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve
the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes
of the Planning Commission's Hearing, with consideration of the environmental
review. ,
The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to
zone the property to the Agricultural Suburban zone classification upon the
filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat.
10. PE-1218-78, UPPER COLUMBIA ADDITION
ZE- 111-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN - Noll
The Board concurred urith the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve
the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes
of the Planning Commission's Hearing, with consideration of the environmental
review.
The Board also concurred with the Planning Conunission's recommendation that
the property should be zoned Sinqle Family Residential upon the filing of the
final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the
filing of the final plat.
11. PE-1219-78, ANCHOR SECURITIES #3 REPLAT
ZE- 112-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Keto
The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve
the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes
of the Planning Commission's Hearing, with consideration of the environmental
review. The Board aiso concurred with the Planning Cominission's recommendation to
zone the property to the Single Family Residential zone classification upon
the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution
and map pending the filing of the final plat.
12. PE-1220-78, CRICK'S SUBDIVISION
ZE- 115-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN - Crick
The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve
the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes
of the Planning Commission's Hearing, with consideration of the environmental
review.
The Qoard also concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to
zone the property to the Agricultural Suburban zone classification upon the
filing of the final plat. The Board taok no action on the resolution and
map pending the filing of the final plat.
- 2 -
~ . .
-
~
,
13. PE-1221-78, MICA VIEW 2nd ADDITION
ZE- 118-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN - Seipp
The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve
the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes
of the Planning Commission's Hearing, with consideration of the environmental
review.
The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to
zone the property to the Agricultural Suburban zone classification upon the
filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and
map pending the filing of the final plat,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the Board hereby authorizes its chairman to sign Final
Declarations of Non-Significance for each item approved above, subject to compliance
with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15.340.
BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS II DAY OF 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, bJASHINGTON
ATTEST: VERNOP W. OHLAN
~'C rk of the Eoar
BY • ,
/ Deputy-
,
. , '
o
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
. North 811 Jefferson ~ Spokane, Washington 99260
August 29, 1978
Honorable Board of County Commissioners ,
Spokane County Court House '
Spokane, WA. 99260
. 'Gentlemen: . .
At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday,
August 25, 1978, at 8:30 A.M., to 12:00 noon, reconvenino at 1:30 P.M., to
6:30 P.M., in the Hearing Room at N.'721 Jefferson, the enclosed action was
taken and is recommencied to the Board of County Commissioners.
Planning Commission members present: Mr. Ted McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Abby
Byrne, and Mess-rs. Kennedy, Main, Quigley and Thomas. Planninq staff present:
Wallis D. Hubbard, Plat Administrator; Pat Frankovic, Assistant-Plat Adminis- trator; Tom Davis, Current Planning Administrator; Gary Fergen, Steve Horobi-
owski, Mrs. Johnson and Mrs. Blanchard,. Engineers' office, Kennaly. Health
District: Prather. Prosecutor's office: Emacio. Sincerely,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
ti ~ ~~u c~LC~j
Ted McCourY, Chairman 4
p~
Fred L. ayh sh, Director of Planning
TMC:myb Official minutes and record of action
taken by the Spokane County Planning
Commission at their regular hearing
held on August 25, 1978.
"RANNING COh1MISSION HEARING MINUTES
August 25, 1978
Lunc .pn Meeting_ It was ecided there would be a Lonq Ranqe Plannin, ommittee luncheon
, meetinq o September l, 1978, at 11:30 A.M. Place an b nced later.
Mr. Eldon Thom \ be a Policy Committee eeting on
asnounced there tiyould
September 6, 1978, at 9:00 A.M., in the Conference Room of the nning
Department at,N. 811 °Jefferson. . ~ .
On that same day, there wibe a wor4cshop .of the Hearing Examiner Com-
mittee, attended by a]1 member of the Planning Commission, at 1:30 P.M.; in the same conference room. September-6, 1978
Members of the Plannin9 Commission ;~`ressed their regret that,Mr. Main
w ld no longer be a member of the Pl'anniig Commission, and*complimented
him a job we11 done during his years wit~the Commission.
1:30 P.M. Meeting convened . . PRELIMINARY SUBDIVIST°O~VS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
PE-1216-78 MOLTER ADDI N(Though opposing testimony and Mo ' n and
ecision on this proposed eliminary plat was held after lunch, e
re lts of that portion of th hearing are documented earlier in th , minut for purposes of.continui . ,
8. PE-1209-73, SOUTH ADAMS ADDITION by McKinley, and ~
ZE- 92-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE- AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the
request for this preliminary plat be CONTIyUED INDEFINITELY. Reason given
was that the sponsor of the plat did not have valid agreement tiyith the .
owner of the land to make lChis proposal. It was, therefore, not presented
to the Commission at this Hearing; and no action was necessary. It was
• pointed out that should the plat 6e resubmitted, the applicant would have
to pay for re-advertising. _ - - - E. PE-1217-78, MICA MEADOWS by Zaracore, and .
110-78 AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTUR SUBURBAPd: That the p>en ry
pla~ be APPROVED, and in so approving, ado'p s the Staff's Finded
Aug dings of facth
5, 1978, as the Plannin9 Cor~mission'in
u~sfollowing~chan ge in the Staff's Condition in p ra a~g~ ph two, painvolving 1~4e:~right-of-way of Pacific Gas Transmissron Company, the state-
ment with regard~to "the right of ingress and egress ~a ~.th~e Pipeline right-
of-way" i s del eted'; and the dedi catory 1 anguage shal 1 i nc~~de the fol_1 owi ng
statements: 1) Odors may occur because of existing feed lot; and
2) Some lots may allow an,i~mals of certain sizes and number unless
zoning ordinance is changed. ~
3) Conditions of Pacific's ltr, . of 8/18/78. Ref. page 9, these minutes,)
(Motion to approve by Byrne, seconde Thomas. Niotion carried tivith five
"yes" votes and one "no" vote.)
- 7 -
. . • ~ ~
. - , - .
•
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING MINUTES August 25',v 1978 .
E. PR IMINARY SUBDIVISIONS A~JD ZONE CLASSIFICATIONS '
10. P 1218-78, UPPER COLUMBIA ADDI ON by NOLL, and
ZE-\1.11-78, AGRICULTURAL- to AGRICkTURAL SUBURBAN: That the prel'minary plat
be AP~ROVED, and in so approving, a opts the Staff's Findings date August 25,
. . 1978, Xs the Planning Comrnission fin ings of fact, and with the fol wing ADDED CO~VDITIONS: 1) Th`at access to Mis.sion Road be \auired, and 2) That~approval is granted for 24 only, and
3) That {oning shall be SINGLE FAMESIDENTIAL.
, (The sponsor of this.proposal presented a r vised pla~t at the'Hearing, whi h
called for incr,asing the lots from 2-4 to,25 ots, which was in disagreemen
with the-plot pl~an lie had presented to the sta f prior to-advertising,)
(Motion to approve \SEC omas, seconded by_-Quigle Uote to approve was
. unanimous.)
11. PE-12~19-78, AP~~CHOR ITI ES #3 REPLAT by Keto., and ZE- 112-78, AGRICULTURAL\to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEPJTIAL: That the preliminary
plat be APPROVED, and in approving, adopts the Staff Findings dated
August 25, 1978, as-the Pla ning Commission's findings o fact, and with the
ADDED CONDITION-that the roa condition will be worked out with the County
*Engineer. (Reference: Condi ions #1 and.#4 on page 11F of indings.)
. (Motion t, approve b~y-Quigley, sec ded by P~lain. Vote to approv was unani-
mous.) ,
12. PE-1220-78, ~ICK'S SUBDIVISION by Cri , andZE- 115-78, AGP\ICULTURAL. to AGRICULTURAL SU6URBAN: That the preliminay plat
be APPROVED, an~ in so apProving, adopts
e Staff's Findings dated August 25,
N
1978, as the Plan ing Commission's findings of fact.
(Motion to approve y Kennedy, seconded by By e. Vote to approve was unani-
mous.)
13. PE-1221-78, N1ICA VIEW 2 d ADDITION, by Seipp, and
E- 118-78, AGRICULTURAL o AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary plat
b APPROVED, and in so app`r~oving, adopts the Staff's indings dated August 25,
19 , as the Planning Commi s~on's findings of fact, a d these ADDED COPdDITIONS:
. Engineer's office re~ests two points of ingress nd egress on
Henry Road; and
2) hat access be limited t~ public roads; and
3) imination of right-of-wa. on the east side; and
4) El' ination of right-of-wa on southeast corner; and
5) Tha the owner, his grantees and assigns, enter into an not oppose
an R. D. on Henry Road; and
6) That a proval of Agricultural `burban is intended for Sin le Family
Residenc~es only and NOT for dupl xes; and
7) That the Nat be.annexed to Conso` i dated Water Di stri ct #l 9; nd
8) That the type of fence across the orth property line be 11mit d to
a barbed wire or woven wire fencing; and
-8-
.
. .
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION v?~, ~9 78
~ OR
PRELIMINARY SUSDIVISION
ACTION TAKEN APPROVE
DENY
, .
LIENGTH OF CONTINUANCE ~
.
REASONS
2.
3.
4.
CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning
Staff's Findings, Dated ,
and subject to the additional conditions that .
, .
2.
3.
VOTE Motion by
Seconded by
VO TE YES NO
i
•
r
AGENDA, August 25, 1978 Telephone No: 456-2274
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION . •
Time: Friday, August 25, 1978 - 8:30 A.M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor ,
N. 721 Jefferson (at Broadway), Spokane
8:30 A.M.
A. l. Planning Commission Concerns
2. Report on Commissioners' Actions
3. Other Business- Page
B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIME
l. PE-1011-76, SWAN ACRES FIRST ADDITION
ZE- 59-76, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SwAN 1
2. PE-1026A-76 KENNEY'S SUBDIVISION #2 ZE- 78A-76 AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
KENNEY 2
3. PS-1118-775 SOUTH RIDGE VIE4J 5th ADDITION
ZS- 114-77, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAtr1ILY RESIDENTIAL
SWARTOUT 3
4. PN-1129-77, FAIRWOOD CREST N0. 7
ZN- 136-77, AGRICULTURAL SUBUR6AN to SIyGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
FARROW CONSTRUCTION COMPANi'........ 4
C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - CHANGE OF CONDITION
5. FC-1141-77, MOUNTAIN VIEW MEAD04JS
ZE- 161-77, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
SWANSON 5
D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
6. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION (cont'd frorn July 28, 1978 Comm. Hrg.)
ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN
KETO 6
7. 'E-1216-78, MOLTER ADDITION
ZE- 114-78, AGRICULTURAL & AGR.SUBURBAN to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TRANSWESTERPI REALTY 7
8. PE-1209-78, SOUTH ADAMS ADDITION
ZE- 92-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE- AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL k*00'6
McKINLEY 8
12:00 Noon Lunch (Place to be announced at hearing)
1:30 P.M. Reconvene
-over-
C~~ ~~~.d.av ar- ~ 8
Ccda,~..
i
. ~
AGENDA, August 25, 1978 TELEPHONE N0. 456-2274
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION '
TIME: Friday, August 25, 1978 - 8:30 A.M.
PLACE: Broadway Centre Bui_lding, Second Floor
N. 721 Jefferson (at Broadway), Spokane
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 8. PE-1209-78 SOUTH ADAMS ADDITION
, ZE 92-78 AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE- AND Tw0 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
a. Location: Section 26, Township 25N, Range 44, E.W.M.
Tract 194 as per plat of Vera on file in
Volume "0" at page 30 of Plats in the office of the Auditor in Spokane County,
Washington
b. Sponsor: Brent McKinley
Transwestern Realty
N. 1014 Pines Rd., Suite 3
Spokane, IJA. 99216 c. Surveyor: Gerald D. Masgai
E. 9803 Sprague
Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 9.58 acres
e. Number of Lots: 27 lots
f. Propbsed Land Use: Single Family and Duplexes
g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning: Single- and Two Family Residential
i. Water Source: Vera Water and Power
j. School District: Central Valley #356
k. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual on-site systems
l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental
impact.
AftC4
Aae ~
x~
~ pE-I.2o9-78
Aac ~
~
4
144aE.
. -8-
P~ 1a°9
r r ~
. . ~ . . . Z,
April 24, 1978
Planning Director
Spokane County Planning Commission
North 311 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
RE: South Adams Addition
Dear Sir:
This letter is to verify that the above subdivision lies
within our boundaries and Vera Water and Power District
can supply power and water to the above subdivision provid-
ing the developer with the District's policies, rules and
regulations.
Sincerely,
~ „ y ~
William J. Job ~
Assistant Manager vg
#950.78 ~ ~
1~
v ~
,
PN~ CQ P~~~
SQ p~ G p~
N
QJ0
. ~ •
r ~
~~+l~E CoG~'~~ _
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
ye,dInter-Offi ce Communi cati on
TN
, Date : A-pril 1978
T0: Spokane Count Planning Commission
' , R.S.
FROM:- Eugene ~6rdp9 R.S. and Eugene C. Prather~
SUBJECT: Proposed preliminar,y plat - SOUTH ADAMS ADDITION
1. References:
~ a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 50', by Senske & Masgai, undated, received
~ by this office April 14, 1978.
~ _o& b. Groundwater Resources and Related GeoloV North Central Spokane and
Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washinp-ton, Department of Water
Resources, State of Washington, 1969.
~
d ~
~ Q o Z c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the
C6 z ~po kane Va l le.y, D. K. To d d, Sec tion 208, Wa ter Resources S tu dy -
Q Me tropo li tan Spo kane Region, U. S. Army Corps o f Engineers Sea t t le
~ District, April 7, 1975•
d. Soil Survey, Spokane Count,y, Washin~;ton, Soil Conservation Service,
U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
e. ~pokane Count,y, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conserva-
tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. •
f. Logs of Vera Water District wells in Township 25, Range 44, Section 26.
g. Field Survey Report, Gene Sharp, Spokane County Health District,
April 24, 1978.
h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973.
2. Topography, soils and water:
a. This project lies in a relatively flat area on the southeast corner of
Adams Street and 16th Avenue. Local drainage ways are insignificant.
It is located over the Spokane Valley aquifer. Pto private wells found
within 100 feet of plat. No public wells located within 150 feet of
the plat.
b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5 percent
slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with
possible contamination of groundwater.
c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand
and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undiffer-
entiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably
been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate
to very large amounts of water.
o ~
SCHD-ADM-118
" South Adams Addition
, Page 2
April 26, 1978
d. The data from the Vera Irrigation District well closest to this plat
shows it to be 160 feet deep and can deliver 3,000 gpm. The total
nitrogen level was 2.084 ppm. The Vera Irrigation District has
indicated that it can supply domestic-use water for the plat upon
completion of agreements with developer.
3. Impact discussion:
a. The plat sponsor has proposed 25 lots on 9.58 acres. Each lot is to
be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage
disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the
. impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for
sewage disposal.
b. In the course of the conduct of the Arn~y Corps study, Dr. Todd considered
typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater,
and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley
upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: '
(1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treat-
. ment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater.
(2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the
groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por-
tion) axe mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the ground-
water and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates,
which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which
are taken up by plant roots," will be less than the total found in
septic tank effluents.
(3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow
' line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids con-
centration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams
per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1.
The forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present
impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved
solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on ground-
water quality is already a substantialproportion of the ultimate
level."
c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen
content of the groundwater as in the range of 2.084 ppm. A projected
incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result
in range of 2.084 ppm. to 2.263 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking
water st andards permit up to 10 ppm.
d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground-
water have the following general characteristics: (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface
waters would require at least tertiary treatment a.nd perhaps more
to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology.
These systems are not currently economically available for this
project.
~
.
South Adams Addition
Page 3
April 26, 1978 (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evapora-
tion for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons, have safety
hazards associated with them and relatively poor cormnunity acceptance.
4. Recommend that :
a. A public water system, including fire flows, serve each lot prior to
sale of the lot.
b. Each lot be authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage system.
c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this
office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of
thirty-three (33) dwelling units are authorized within the plat.
EWS/sk
ec: Senske & Nlasgai Engineers, Inc.
East 9723 Sprague
Spokane, Washington 99206
~
aFF*' OF COUNTY ENGIr~~R . ' SPOKANE COUN7Y, WASHINGTON
Data
tnter-office Conmmunicatioe ~ . • Ta PLANNING COMM'iSSiON . . • .
from GA6tY KENNALY, PI.ANNING & TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGIAIEEft AlAAA-' , . • •
. . ,
Ub#ct RQAL) SdNDIMNS * F.-0 PG l 20 -"1 Q So vT-J4 AQ&,~,S I.~
*CANUITIONS CTHCLEU A.PPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION
that conditional approval of the plat is givea oubject to dedicati4n o!: Ri&Ett 'og Llay to tha pu5lic and appcoval of the road system in the p1aC 'by t.he County FagtQ,a4;
that plans, profile9, and cross sections showing proposed street centerZias and Cutb
grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval p=ior to constsuctiron and .
the filing of a final plat; . , .
0-that drainage plan9 aad de9lgn calculatioas ehoving thQ grade9 aad aligmsnt of draiq,-- .
age iacilities be submitted to the Couaty Engineer for appxovat prioaC Gp c.Qa.st.;ruGr,,i.oca
an3 the filir►g of a fiaal plat;
_G~construction within tha proposed public strents and easecaents shrall be perfost,ied .
under Cha direct supervision oF a licensed land aurveyor, who shall be Xeapousi'bla
for perpetuating all evidence of ths loca[ion of survey manumeate wbich -pay be di,sturbad during construction and who shall furnish tha Couaty En,gineer N3.th "As
.Built" plans and a certi.ficate in Writing that all improvemants were iast41144 Co
the lines and grades shnwn on the approved cangtrucCioR plans aad ttu~t all. disturbed
raonunznts have been replaced; .
~ no construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way until a perqait
has oezn issuad by the Councy Engineer. All work is Qub jeCt to iaspection and approval
by the County En3lnaer;
~6 all consttuction wfthin the Public Righ[ of Nay is to be comple[ed priox to filing tha f inal plat or a bond in th:t a,uount es tianated by thQ Cuunty F•tigiwae= to cover the
cost o' con.3truction of improv2ments, constructioa certiftcBCiott, "A* $uile" placts,
end ^:onw-aenting the street centerlines shall be filed with Che County PgLzaex.
7-na direct accees from lotg co 1/2 ri6hC of weys unttl euch tio4e es additionel cioht of
ways are dediceted and roeds are esteblished ae County Roede.
ti-no direct eccess from lots to Stub Road connections unCil 8uch roede eXe conetruc~ed to County Standarde end established as Councy Roeds. ~road design, agNo construction, and dreinage control for 1/2 righte of weys
and Stub R,oad connectLons are the reaponeibility of the Developer.
•.10-thet the Sponsar stiell prepere and eubmit to the County Engineer a design'proposal eccopt-
able to the Stete Hi.gt►way Uepsrtment of the propoeed SCate Highway-County Roed inter-
eection. State Highwny Departmen[ epproval of the propoeed cleaign a►uBt be received prior
to che Eiling of the final plat. IcaprovetnenCe to the State H1gliway ere to be the reepon-
sibility of the Sponeor and may either he conetrucCed ur e bond to covec Cbe coet of 9uch .
improvemenr_s furnLahed to the Caunty Engineer ln the eaiount ee detercuined by [he'County
Engineer and Che 5tete HLghwey Depertment.
' 1 t hatnginalleer. rodds Fxlwii.hin ttle plat, t~e curbed anc,~ peved to the specificetio18t °shathe ll be~ty
~ roacis Ilroviding direct access to lot9 of the p
E sting Count,y
paved endmo curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. G✓Q$ prCror•~4 PLAT SoE
pAVE a v r zu E064F o c E:X/STi~6
(T,"~odirect access from l.ots to AoA-•,, 5 12o,4-.D
• /
:,-13 edication o.£ ~0 ~ add.ztional Ra.ght of Way along~#~S a-4 *lcot# 14ar'A-JVF.
E-14-that the okner, his grantees and assigns agree to participate in and not oppoae or
(irotest an RID on
nL6e 112. RJw pN Pt2oPosED 13vi2A/S llo.a-D ,dt < weeA/ / 7/* t' 10*,Qc,6-
Mp,~y tv o i 13E N EE.DEo Ou E Z'z, prZo PoSED 04E57(/Ez.o#Ai-xE~vT oF ADJo iN/NG
p12p~tZ,~y v iA A S t-4d R.i *%-.)L^To
0
~t -
RECEIPT ~ Date AAA) AA 19 8 0200
.
Rece i ved From a.v .
Ad&ess
,
Dollars $
For..~~-4~ p !ae~ G~~• Y~,e~.a~. ~Y.~`.
4w
ACCOUNT HOW PAta
AMT Of ~ I CASH ~ I
ACCOUtV1 At7 AMT.PA10 CHECK •0' ~ , :~'Y .•,.r•:.•....,
6ALANCE MONEY Q~
~ OUE URDER D
8K806
M
~
. ,
. ,
- '1'`~~.e ''i'~' ~~~'t""" • - ~
,•..r?. ~ • ' 1. •F : i ~i'ed-.t. ~ / v , \ \`!'ll l~/~``,~ i I
1~~ • { ~l , -
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBUC WORKS BUIIDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2274
' ' ,i ` ~ ? „
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
• : . -.,ak; K : - -
SPOKANE COUfITY COURT HOUSE M£ M O RA NDU M
Q!,) ~51~5 C~ ~Dc
TO :12~rQ Cb. 4E-90I► ~95 r. ~ V~RA l,c~R~ ~LU R. . r ?~S'~L~
t3T77u• t7uvI~ ~1t~.i7~1 ~atJ, '~l'h JusiZLS /9rT~tl. )t5
FROM: Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Wa 99201
509-456-2274
Attention: ~~'~1
REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff
Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which
are attached. .
Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a
division of Spokane County, has determine3 that the County, as an ACTING
AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project:
RE ;2a<Y
<S O C> % -11.[. 4Q)J4 MS )4 Dt~ i T)7 D XJ ~
This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220.
Information on file concerning Chis proposed actzon indicates your agercy to be
an AGENCY OF JURISD'LCTION, W.I1C 197-10-040 (4)
Accordingly, if you wish to ?xercise your option to review and comment as oro-
vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was
issued on . Please respond, if appropriate, at your
earliest pportunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for
20
►-f ~ f• ~ ;;n
South Adams
K{~
Sewerage Alternatives
p L Y, r~,,, I~ 3i o ~ I
27 lots @ 3.5 person per lot = 94 persons
94 persons @ 100 gallon per day = 9400 gallons
Linial feet of drainfield @ 6 gallon/L. f./day = 1566 L, f./day
Three alternatives for sewage disposal will be analysed:
(1) On site septic tank
(2) Community septic tank
(3) Comrr,unity package treatment plant
(1) On site septic tank
Cabital costs
27 Cd 750 = $20,250.00
Annual costs
Pumping @ 3 year intervals @$60 ea $ 540.00/yr
Drain field replacement @ 5%/yr
@ $3/L.f. @ 200' per rouse = 810.00
Total 0& M annual costs $ 1,350.00
(2) Community septic tank
Capital costs
(Est.) 10,000 gallon multi-chamber
tank installed $ 6,000.00
Lift station with appurtenances 4,000.00
Drain field @ 1566 L. f. 4,698.00
8" sewerage line 2585 L.f. 20,680.00
4 manholes @ $800.00 3,200.00
Loss of 2 lots 24, 000.00
$62,578.00
Annual 0 & M costs
Pumping $ 360.00
Drain field replacement (10i yr) 469.80
Periodic line cleaning 200.00
Electrical pump & maintenance 400.00
Total 0& M annual costs $ 1,429.80
(3) Community package treatment plant
Capital costs
Plant with appurtenances $16,000.00
Drainfield 4,698.00
8" sewer line 20,680.00
4 man holes 31200.00
Loss of 3 lots 24,000.00
$68,578.00
• -
South Adams
Page 2
Annual 0 & M costs
Pumping clarifier $ 360.00
Drair_ field replacement 469.80
Pericdic line cleaning 200.00
Electrical, pump & tank maintenance 51000.00
Total annual 0& M costs $6,029.80
The fcllowing table summarizes the costs associated with the
three alternatives sewage waste disposal systems considered:
Annual Cost/Unit Ca.pital Cost/Unit
On site septic tank $ 50.00 $ 750.00
Community septic tank $ 52.95 $2317.70
Community package treatment plant$223.33 $2539.93
No community facilities currently exist near the project site nor
are there prospects in the near future of a ma j or community
sewerage system.
Concentrations of septic tank effluents or package treatment
plant effluents into one smaller drain field area can create
greater potential for ground water contamination according to
some sources.
I therefore recommend on site septic tanks for South Adams
based on capital costs, annual 0& M costs and reduced potential
for ground water contamination.
~P` ~
V y
e ~ ~ ° /
_ -Y
Legal Description
For Transwestern Realty
Job No. 1228
May 11, 1978
Tract 194 as per the plat of Vera on file in Volume
"0" at Page 30 of Plats in the office of the Auditor
R
of Spokane County Washington
~V,P1.D D.
• WAS.~
o •
.
.
~ o.
.
-t,. 4-0 •c~c
y9°••9~OISTE~~~•~`~~
/ l • ' S
I AND J oZ. 0 ~f - 1 ~
~STAFF FINDIfJG5 1 9- p~
--p- - f i--1-e _n,uvbeor_ a n_d_"Hne-4)~.~./.~-
m rgnu=rn-ber -a-nd.changej_
i
PRELIMINARY SUBDIUISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
1. GENERAL I(VFORMAT ION
~
A. Location
~ ~ ~ c
y • '
B. Proposal AND 2~r`'~"s~
-1. 5-0o acres subdi vi ded i nto 1 ots for si ngl e fami 1y t~►, -Typi cal 1 ot frontage = ?7 ' o J ~ ~
-Typical lot size = /!yS°a0 ?'°'s
C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan -Approved maP of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage of this ,
area, with no density designation.
-Approved ComPrehensive Plan map designates all nearby surrounding lands for
residential use.
D. Exi sti n Land Uses,
/ i ~ ~ \ ✓ ` ` ^ i ~ ' ' #9 ~~r " ` •
. //p► .
~ I ✓ Ll_ A ~ ~
1 a
/ ♦ ~ /f
.~A W,~
. , • ' ° ; ~t' - ~ _~1,-,!-+3 s• ,f_-~'~ ~ ~ ~
' r. ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' - ^ f0O~ , ~
^ s _ ~ ~ ' ~ ~,6 ~.*i~ ` ~i" ~ ~ ~ ' ' , ~..i~ „-Cx a
F 4 W e \ iG ~ ~t ' 1W
1 41~1 4(!
i
~ ` `_yi°"-'M l' i•q / ~j ~ ~P~rt e~'
c .t- ° i- s ~ i ~ ~ ~j ` Fd~i~9 . f
e
E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses ,
- ~
~ .,,.~L,
~
` ~ • ~ / ~ " ~
.
c ~~1 i t• •
A -
FINDINGS - (date) J0L4 7. '4 #A 5 ~P r: - continued ` -.a-l._a.~.,.ra.Me:.- .
II. SPECIAL IPlFORMATION: A. Circulation , -The County Road Engineer has examined the proposed preliminary plat and finds the roads within the plat to be basically acceptable.
~
B. Sewage Disposal .
-The applicant's engineer has prepared an analysis of alternative sewage d.isposal.
means, including on-site septic tank disposal,-community septic tank dispQsal,
and community package treatment plant disposal. For economic reasons and to
provide the most realistic alternative, the applicant's engineer feels on-site
septic tanks should be utilized'.
-The Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site
sewage systems for each lot within the plat. The District stat,es that an
on-site sewage management system should be created and approved by their office
prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of dwelling
units are authorized within the plat. The plat is situated over the 'Spokane
Valley Aquifer and the Health District in their examination of the possible
impact on groundwater quality from this proposal have the following comments:
- g -
, .
.
FINDINGS - - continued .
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION (cont'd) , •
Impact Discussion
a. The pl at sponsor has proposed e~ 1 ots on ~.~~acres wi th a typi ca-.l -l ot' •
size of 9 7 by / 3S feet. Each lot is to be served by a public water ~
system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the_
question of significance of the impact on the groundwater -in the area and- '.possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered
typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater,:and,'..
the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon. the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that:,
In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment
effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater.
All the dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the* groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate'portion),_
are mostly removed by the deep soil layer abov.e the groundwater-and,
"minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to .
react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant- roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. .
The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater fl.ow line .
indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentratio.n .
expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams-per'liter)
above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast -
year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 ab.ove the;.natural background. T he ana ly tica l resu l ts o f t he foreca st impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both ,
measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids, concentra- .,tion, indicate that the present impact on groundwater qudlity is already a substantial proport-ion of the ultimate level. . ,
~J ~a~: ~ ~~4' • ' . .
c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen con,tent.qf the groundwater as in the range of l:p°pm'. A projected incremental increase. .
usi ng Dr. Todd' s expected 8.6 percent woul d resul t i n a range of 1':4-ppR_. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 1Q ppm. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge thp groundwater
have the following general characteristics; . l. Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface
waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more
to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department o.f Ecology,. .
These systems are not currently economically ava'ilable for this
project. ~ 2• Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evapora-. .
tiun for liquid removal. These systems require more land area than
a conventional subsurface drainfield. Some, such as lagoons, have .
safety hazards associated with them and relativeiy poor community-
acceptance. Land, installation and operational cost are gene.rally more expensive than those for septic tanks and drainfields.
.
c -
r,
. . .
FINDINGS - 5-omr'14- 1?mf 14AParc-4 continued
(date) (Plat Name)
II. SPECIAL INFORh1ATION (cont'd)
C. Drainage
-The County Utilities Engineer refers that the preliminary storm drainage
submittal f rom the applicant indicates the on-site storm drainage provisions will adequately handle surface water runoff. However, final construction plans
should be reviewed and approved prior to the final plat filing.
D. Water Supply
-Proposal is located within recorded service area of
-This District advises that adequate system capacity, and a desire on their
part to serve, exists for the provision of water for domestic, fire and
irrigation uses.
E. Fire Protection
-Proposal is situated within recorded service area of
-Mains and hydrants of 'sufficient size for fire protection should be required
as a condition of final plat approval as determined by the Fire District staff.
F. Schools
-Proposal 7ies within the boundaries of
- D -
I
FINDINGS - - continued (plat name)
II. SPECIAL INFORMATIOPJ (cont'd)
G. Parks -The report "Planning for Parks" (revised 1976)
H. Unique Environmental Features ' I. Cultural Resources '
. ,
III. ZONING ANALYSIS
I U. ENU I RONMENTAL REV I EW -Environmental checklist submitted by the sponsor has been reviewed and no significant adverse environmental impacts were judged to exist. -Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified on the checklistin the
following categories: earth; air; water; flora; noise; light and glare; iand use;
population; housing; transportation/ciruclation; public services and utilities:
-The Plalning Director issued a proposed Declaration of PJon-significance and it was
circulated to other agencies of jurisdiction.
_ E
. • . , - , • c -FINDINGS - - continued
(plat name) . V. CONDITIONS: -
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended.
Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced' '
in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard Conditions for Approval of.
Preliminary Plats," August, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department. NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed her-eafter. -P-1, P-23, P-32 P-42 P-59 P-6, P-12 P-8, P-9, (July l, 1979) P-10, P-11, P-12, P-13:.
, .
-E-1, E-22 E-32 E-49 E-52 E-6, E-71, E-81 E-91 E-10 . -A-1 . -H-l, H-2, H-33, H-42 H-59 H-6 -That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080pRCW-,and. the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplis.hed by the project-
applicant within (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners,
with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the P1anningDepa,rtment
Staff. -That a public water system, serviced by
including fire flows serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. ,
-That an on-site sewage management be created and approved,by the Health Office prior.
to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of dwelling units
are authorized within the plat.
-That the Planning Commission sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of.Non-
Significance and recommends issuance of a final declaration of.non-si~gnificance.
-That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and'
approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer. '
-That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to
-That the project sponsor may not be notified by the Planning Department of, the need to request an extension of time for the renewal of any preliminary.plat approval . granted by the Board of County Commissioners.
; .
- F-
PE-1209-78 & ZE-92-78
In the Matter of a Hearing to consider the application of Transwestern Realty, North
1014 Pines Road, Suite 3, Spokane, Washington, to file a plat to be known as SOUTH
ADAMS ADDITION. Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to-Single
Family Residential and Two Family Res1dential on the property described belo.w,, suc K
zone change to become effective only upon th.e fill,ng of a final plat or plat!i of slich
property. The property being platted is described as; Tract 194 as per the plat of
Vera on file in Volume "0" at Page 30 of Plats 1n Spokane County, W.ashington, in
Sec. 26, T 25N, R 44 EWM.
(SE corner of 16th Ave. and Adams Rd.) AFFII?AVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
. ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
~ ~~P.Oko() Lc. , being Rrst du}y sworn on oath,
~ ~ .
deposes and says:
That I am a citizen of the Unfted States of Amerlca, and a restdent of the State of
Washington over the aye of 18 years.
That on the lLI day of personally
posted one (1) or more true and rrect copies of ~.he hereto attached and incorporated
herein by reference IVOTICE OF PUBLIC HEtiRING ~n a conspicuous manner at each of
the following locattons, to-wit:
7c~~~' .
.
2 .0 ~ 11.? CO
,
DATED THIS f~ DAY OF . ~1 19 -79/ •
T
SIGNE
.
Subscribed and Sworn to betore rrie thls Zk day of ~-a~ , 19
- Notary Publfc [n and for the State of
Washington, resi,ding at Spok3ne, Washingro:
~-t 33 sHSa w ag
aUG 07 P. M. .
LAND FILE POLL CARDS . UaMrsa Hz
PHOI~'► ~ ~ 7Y CHARGE T0: 's90=1:01 590102 590301/590302
~ ~ FR+OJ=
` a . , - - -
~►c ccoE sEC. R. o, eLK.-LoT K ~
4 S a 7 a 3 10 13 14 9 i 6 , v~ . .
.
• ;
G 9 1~,,r~~ - d 7 1 y
~ ~ .
J5i Kvtiounch aLtruct
Cha rge to : 590102 ,590301 / 590302
col. 1 ie a quote mar ( numeric "H"
_3 D q, cols. 2- 4 ia conetant "691".
~ cola. 5- 13 ia numeric uith blanjcs aocsptable
Do nat zero Pill'..
; col. 14 13 n quote msrk (numeric "H",).
~ 3 i. - 3, i
~ 91 2
Identi fy and separate batches for computer room.
This job must be completed no later than two (2)
ra days after recei pt. t i i
w~'6 gL, ~ D 3 8- Forward data to the computer room for processing.
,
F.~ i to ~ Return these sheets to the Planning Department .
upon completion of Keypunching; attention of: °
Pl at Secti o~n/Zoni ng Secti on/Zoni ng Adj uster. R~ '6 91 ~
~
' col. 1 ie a quote mark (numeric "H" LJ ' ` ' ' 1019 . 2 - 4 ia conatant "691" .
col3. 5- 13 ie tnuQeric uith blat4cs acmptable .
c y I Do not zsro fill'. n
r~
; col. T4 is a quote i~srk (numeric H",).
Identify and separate batches for computer room.
9
This job must be completed no later than two (2)
I I -A days after receipt.
► i
s
Forward data to the computer room for processing.
~ 6 9L
Return these sheets to the Plannina Department
Lik 9 1 1 uPon compl eti on of Keypunchi ng; attenti on of :
--~--Pl at Secti on/Zoni ng Secti on/Zoni ng Adj uster.
, . ~ a►
~
r-'G9 C e .
~ ~ i..N
$EC. T. R. Q. BLK.`IrOT
' -(09 1
10 t3
6 Ol on3y
,3.. 2i5L4 ii- O'9, 4.1 Parce 1 numbei- 32 541-0S
-A
G' ~ ' 2 4-019,~0,~, Parcel numbere 32541-0800 thru 32541-0809
G 9 L 4. _ i Parcel nutabers 325~41-0800 thru 32541-0899
~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ 9, ~ ,3z~s~
' ~O 3 Ng 1/4 ot asc. 32, twp- 25, r;gs. l~
,
-7 ~ A 11 of eec. 32, tvp. 25, rge. l..~
+
S J ►
(2 A1l of txp. 25, rge. 44
S ~ 4` ,
A11 of rge. 44
Sectfone w3.thia
;'I
Tovnshi a
~-(a-~- ~ . ~ . 06 0 02 Ol
07 0S 14 11112
18117 Ib 15~ 13
' - 19120121,22 2 3 24
1 02 6 z
► t + ~
• 2 ~1 1 31 6
Y. .l ~
51 , _ r.... •
. Z
►
tb 1Qusrter eections
vitlsia Fsection
2 1
3 4
JQ8 Nurw~R ~S~~~J L~~ A L D E S C R I P T I f~ N ~ i S'~ JUhI~ 4, 4~'8
~ P K~1 : Y L A~M ~ F ' ~ ~ A ~ ~~Ut~~ '~EAL I~,~
. , M ~~RC Et ~~C U Eh~T
~ N~1M~ ~R Nl1M~~~ ASSESS~D ~~r~V~R ~~GA~ D~SCR ~PTi~4~ ~F pR~PERfiY _ - - _ - ~`A~~AYE~
a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _
~~5~~-1~+~~p 7~~12$~~~i CHAS ~~it~~~~ vE~a ~~~~~r ~C B~?~ EsC i A~ G~~~ES , ti
l ~C 84 ~ 14~'~5 D5Tl~ ~AV~ ~
` Y~R~4~AL~ I~A ~490~7
23544-1~r11 7~4~~i2~~~~9'~ CNA~ ~ MfHARA Y~RA ~~l~'~RY A~ B~~tO ~T~ MfIH~~tA ~C~aR~.~'S
4? ~ T~ AY lll 94 ~ 1 C 1~ E - - _ ~
v~~aa~~~ ~~v~~
~ ~
~r~~ ~ v~~~ .c~~~~~r ~c a~~~ ~~c ~~~res~~~~s
~'d'~ ~3 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~i r' ~ 1?~ ~5 3 } ~ 9 ~"~z ~ f ~ , ~ ~c~~'
~~'~#~4-14~,,~~~ 6171~~C ~ E PEh~~~ET~~I JR _'V~E~A !C~~RR1~ ~C 817~ ~ZC E'~~~T~dBIE 5~1.
~ c~t ~r,~~,~ r~,~,~ L 1~'~ 4 ~ C~ 4 Q /
~ ~ ~ o ~
2~544~ ~41+~ 37+4~~4~C A~ ANQtr~S~h~ IIERA CHE~RY AC B1T~ ETC P~~ NAT ~~c 5N ~ 4 ~i C
~~3~ ~,1 ~ / t~ ~ ~ z~~
, - ~ ; ~ . R ERA ~I ~~i1f l E3 ~I ~SE~ A~ S ~ 235~~r 141 ~ l~b#' 11~ J~. u~ SEY V C~ AC ~ C ~
. ~'4.AN I ~lf ~QM ~P"~~I~ ~~~~#'~1l' ~I M13S~41~ - ~L~'~ B4 E 1k~C3 l'~PH AY'~
~ ° ~Y ~R5 1 I . ~~~~~i~ ~ ~ ~or ~ v~~a~~~~
~ ~ I~~ . . -
~~~~T'~_ _ ew ~~~44-1~~b 1~6fl11~ J L~~R~~Y W~'~A C~~~~Y A~ ~1~~ ~TC ~I~ M4l~T S
, L 1 ~ ~ 4 ~'~'s , ~i 9
_ - ~ . ~~~44- ~41?w ~~b551~ ~L ~I I~A~'~I~E ~J5 'V~~A ~H~~~Y AC B~ ~TC "S~fC PA~ ~I ~P
~t f ~ 1 ~ ~ 4 ~~Q / / ~ ~
~~x~G
~ - - _ ~35~+~-15~1 7~~,~~6~2~~ ,~i~N~1V E R~~~I 11~~A CH~~~Y ~C 817~ 'E~C FI~ ~II~T K t~~
a~ ~'o ~ - ll ~5 '4 ~~A D I~~
~ G
i ~ A R~~ ~~T~S V~RA CH~R~Y AC ~'tC Ph~ N~1 ~d ~ 2~~44 15~~2 118 ~ ~ S ~ ~
J~~'~~ i~~ ~5 ~t~
_ ~ ~ 2~~4~r T5~3 +~~OZ~~O~~i~ ~~I~E~V~ ~ lk~~T VE~R~ ~l~~R~11 A+~ ~17 ~T~ PA~ NA~ N~ASH
~ n~ ~ 99~ ~ 1~~C`~
~3~~r~+-15~~ 1E~~~~JC~b1 GWIGN~ ~~EH~1 VE~A ~~i€~RY A~ 9~7~ ~~C ~~E~~Ii~Q~ BER~S ~c
/~4+'~'~ I ~ ~ 4 ~ S ~5 ktG
~C~ ~~~a~7 L ~1 ~EY V~~ N~R~Y AC ~17t! ~"~C ~AlVCSHAR - ~ ~ 235~~i-1~~~ 1 ~NNI~ ~ A A~ G
~'4 ~ l~~ ~fi , ~ / 1 ~ ~ ~
~ Y ~ l~ ~ _ _ -
~35~4~I5~b ~~0~1~54b~~ ~'I~I E H~L +~~~A C~'~RRY AC t~ ~T+C fk~~~~5 ~C ~ ~ ~
L6 9~ R ,q , f
~ r~~ ~ . 4 ~ ~ ~ ~455 R D~~IE 'V~~A H~R~Y AC 817~ ~1'~ 0~ C~~1~ ~ ~ ~ _
~ i l~ 7~C~'l ~ ~ ~ ~ ALI, ~1~ 8~ ~ 1~9~~ ~~~H AV'~
_ _ SP~IiAlV~ '99~{~6
~3544~ 1~1~~ ~6G~~~'~45~ F. ~NK C I~U~'M 4'E~~4 C~IER~RY AC 817~ ~fiC ~IA~W Ft~ti~ ~C ~ .
~ 7rs ~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ 8 5 i5d~~8Q ~`~ar~ -
~ ~3~44-~51~~ ~~a1~~CZ1~ L J H~L[~EB~A~V 11E~A ~#~~~~Y AC ~17t~ ~'~C f~0 MUT SAY ~ ~ i~ a ~ c~ ~ 7 / ~1Z ~ 3 ~C4529 ~
_ ' ~LL ~
Z~5~4~~51'~~ 75~!14~C~I~ L,~ W~L~~EB~~N~ YERA CN~~tR~' AC 817'~ ~~'C ~1'Q ~1UT ~Z
. ~ 45~+~ ~ L 1~~ r 3 9~ ~
Z3~4~-~51~w 7~~~10~~~+~ No~~I~ ~aM ~~~a ~~~~~r ~C ~l~o ~~C ~At~C~I~~RE G ~
/'~~n3 I~G ' ~~~~L~~r ~5 15~
~ ~
~3544-1515v 74~'~1~0~~4~6 ~~R~IS HA~I 1~~Rd~ Ch#~RR1~ AG 8174 ~TC BA~NC~a I~~`~ } . 1# ~S ~ 15 1
~~544=~5i~r 74~~10~046 N~RRIS HAl~ V~RA CI~'~R~RY A~ B~?'4 ~TC BAI~~S~I~4 MTG
WS • 5 ~ ~ L1~ B
~3544-151~~ b~14~1~6~ J~~~ ~ SM~~ICK ~ERA CM~ER~1l A~ BI7~ E~~ ~A~ 1S S'~l ~R~ ~f £.l~~' xe~.'L 17 B 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~4
_
~ h ~~z~~ ~ ~ ~tsH~~ v~~k ~~~~~r Ac e~~o ~r~ r~fi~ s ~ ~
r~ - ~ Ll~ 85 FN ~ ~'4'~8b6 JP~ ~
~354~i# 1~19~ ~7~~15~85~ C~iA~~~S Ft R E ~I~RA CH€~RY A~C SLI( t74 EfiC C'~I~MU~i1~' 'L
~ S ~ ~r ~ I~~~. ! ~9 ~ l~ ~T ~f~0 8L1~ ~ 55
+ ~ ~ c~~ 2~~~4~ 1~5Z4~` TtC5~4Q~ 3~ Y~~E'~H~ VER~, CH~RRY AC BLK 17C ~TC DEEH~ YER~1 ~ JR
` ~ T ' 7 H W1{~ ~F L T~ LT ~~~c~ ~111 ~~.K 5 ~ 14 1Z 1~'~ l~Y~
~ VERA~A~~ ~lA 49(~~T c' ~-.7~.c~.~",
- r
~3544-15~1~ 7~~C1~1517 J J~TER~~ I W'ERA ~H~~ti~~ A~ ~L~ 17Q E~C GRfi ~I~E~T~~N
~111' 0~ LT 8~ Atl lT 9 8~K 5 581~4 ~399 . f~~
~ .r - ~~~4~r-1~Q~ ~~8►~~~ M~T ~IT~ ~ 5EC CO 1~~RA NZ1~ ~F 5~15 ~F ~ASTI~AN 41RlT~ER J
_ _ PR R R - ~Il~ ~~~T S 1~~4 ~G ESS ~
~ ~ ,r~~~ 1►E~ADA~~ ~IA 99~~7 .[.~c ~.c¢r
544-~ b 7~ 1~446 ~C--- C~. HO~~R YE~A ~'t 61~T H~]9~R~ ~YELYN - ~ ~ ~ 1 ~0 ~ ,
~ ~ ' ~115 OF ~ll~ ~~fC ~~94.5FT< A1.5~ INCI I~3;2FT QF i~39.~~FT ~~X l81
~i~~.SFT f~F s~~~ s~ a~~7 a~~ss~
L~J~~ I J~V ~~~i ~ ~ U~~RR ~1 i7~~~~~ ~~~+M A1. ~ / ~ ~ i ~ ~~~~5~~ ~~C~IR J ♦
. L~J~S °9 ~ ~0 B3 S ~5~'~r ~Ai~REN _ V~R;~~al~ WA 49~~
~~54~-~~1~w 5~3~7~~C hl H NA~tT' V~RA ~HERf~Y AC B 1~'~ ETC ~~'~M 1Mfi / 3 `
~ LOTS ~ B~ l~ 9
' A Y R / F hi 1~ X C L1 R~t ~4lV ~I 2~543-~~a2 `~1~~9~u~8 M ~L GQ~M~~ ~ ~ 5I ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~l
rt38T.1' ~F BLft ~B~ E~C ~T S 142~ A~A~S ~
Y~~tA~AI~ 11A '~a~37
,
~~~~r3-~5t~4~" ~~6~T?C JOHN ~I ~I~h~ZEI V~~tA ~65FT ~F ~t4~~.1FT I~~ ~IE~1~~~ JCF~N M ~
S 11 8I ~ 5 ~~~b~ T 1~6~'N AY~ YERkDAI~~ IiA 99I}~T
~t v ~ ~ ~~5~i~-~SQ~ T'TOOI~Ea90~ ~IC~AR~ ~I K ~ Y~RA N1{~~i ~F '~1 ~F ~AC ~S? ~f{~ , .
~~12 GF ~LK 1$~ E~~ ~f45~.1~ 4~35 - 7~ ~,c~-~.c~~c1' ~
~~5~3-25DT~ 7~~L~~b~'9~~t~ RI~~I~R~ ~ li S~A ~'E~A SX~~~ t7~ PI~!~~~ PAC S~L '~P~ R «
E 11t~ ~F ~ ~ OF ~~I~ I~5 ~1~5~.1 49~5~
~~543-C5~t~ ~99~~~~ LI~L~AhI ~~IANhi~l~ VERA 5~~~ tl~ ~LK 185 ~XC L~A~!'E '~L~YO F'
~ ~ ~ ~'~,,,r~ ? ~I45~.~ ~ ~XC ~1~~ ~F N~~t~ S ~'~~4 AGA~'S RD - ~ ~
Y~~A~A~~~ I~A '~94~~`
- Y ~ - _ .
R ~4 MA ~N fi R JR ~ ~E~~41-~101" 7bfl90~J~3~1~ M~,I~S~h~ ~~AL V~ A ~1 ~3S ~CHE$ ~ ~4
~ E ~4A~6 1bT~i AIl~ ,l f, i I y . ~j
j V~~A'~~A~~ ~A 9~~3T ~ - ~ ~
~4 -~~7 ~'G~ 4~I i~ V~RA SII~ EK ~ AC ~1~~ t~'~ECQR 1~L ~ ~6 1 t~~ 77 1~~11 IC A~l ZA C~ ~
. S 17~4 P~~~~t~~S ~
- V~R~drAi~g ~1~ ~~~3T
~~541-fi ~~~~~4C wAS~ T~~ST VE~A N1AC S~AC ~19~ ~~LY~~ ~Ill~~~ H ` ~
a r ~ ~ F - , - ~ ~
VfRAD~LE ~lA '4'~~3T
1b~41~~~~~~ 537~~~1~C 1~AS~i T~UST '~~c V~~,~ S1AC B1'95 ~~'~V~R V~iL~.t~fi~ ~
_ 9~~t 1~
~A A ~ 94 7 YE 'C ~iA 3
~~~41~~~1~~~ ~~~7Z~rC ~ CARLSai~ Y~RA N11;~ OF ~L~ I°9~ ~~C RA~ 1'~T ~EC~ ~P~ - ~ ~ ~ ~
x~a~~ ~ ~'t~ ~1~~► 1~ ~
~ ~~-f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t UT E H T ~ ~~541 C714 Tb~~~~~r98 C~~1~'~C ~ VE A 82~0 C ~ ES E 0~
S i 1Q+~ BARft~R R~
GRE~NACRES ~9#}lb
~65~+~.-~815' ?~6~1~301~98 C 0~lT~C~IT YERA B~Q1 U~'~C~~` CNLST'~~t I~
5 ~ lU~ ~B~R1~~R R~ ~ - -s - ~ _ _ w~
•ti ~ q~ 4
94 A A~ BNU A K!~ ~~5~~-34~5 7~4~~7y 6 ~~N~I~TH J ~NG ~ ~lY ~ ~ SEC ~R PAC NAT ~ ~ ~tA~F~
- ~ - . ~5 ~~3 ~~~341~fi~ . - ~
_ ~ ~ ~ _ ~G~ / f
26~4,~-3~~~ ?~O~1dI73~ ~ I~~G~IUL ~1 ~A~LY ~AYIN SEC~N~ AGD ~dIN~€~ ~l~G _
~1 1 L~i B~~ 404~ ~ Q~b~~i~r~ . ~ 9f~ ~ .s ~ 9 r ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~~3~~T" 7~~41T~4~~ ~~BT ~~I~~l~ R ~ARIY DAwN ~E~COND ADD PA~ t~AT ~!c t~ASN
f ~ . ~ ~ 7 ! ~,7 ~~3 3
• f~~rG
~ 4~ ~~r~~rZ-J409° 7B~~Q~~4T~5 L~7U~~ #M E~~LI~ '~AW~I ~ECQ~Nt~ A~U ~~lC NAT 8~ ~F YlASN
LB 4[' ~4~ gt~~
~~~42~3~►~9d ~7t~~1~'98~~6 H,4A~E C[~NS1'~ C~l ~A~RLY 0~4WN $EC~M~ A~D H~A~~ C~I~Si~RUC~'~~'1~ TNC i - 9 4 ~I ~ M R Y A~ L ~~3 f ~IC ON G~ ~
~ ~ SP~KA~NE 4~A 9"4~~~
-~b~4~~~41~ 7~C~l~b~~~4 T R C~~~ER ~A~~Y aAw~l 5~~~~1~ A~~ 8A'~~5~~~4R~S _
t~ ~ ~f ~ llf~ B23 ~137 /7 . 1
~r~ : ~ _
~t~5~i2-3~1t`' ~~~~17~T~b PAUL I. ~H~1R~~R EAR~Y ~A~I~# S'~C~-1~i~ AI~~ ~A1~C~HA~f ~ ~ L 1 ~ 3 T25
r~ ~ ~ ~ q ~ -
- ~~'~~r~~~41~~ 7~~'G~~~7~9~ ~L~~~Iti~CE ~ ~R ' E~R~L11 ~AWN S'~~OP~~ AUD BA~l~SHA~tES M~'~
f L ~~3 lfi13~9
i ~ .
Z~'~~~~~~QZ~~ ~:~74b9~ ~`~~~EY B ~L~MG ~6 25 44 ~~~4FT Df H~~LI~i~ I~~SL~~'
14 S1~~FT ~F N33L'F"~ ~F SE ~ ~F 1~~ 1,14 '~F NY~~l4 5~~24 ~~AN~S Y~R,~~A~~ 1~~ 9~~T
2+6~4~-~9~3~y 7740I~b~~19 ~IL~dS J ~A~T~~ ~b ~5 ~ik ~t'9~.~~~' ~!~C I~iTERl~
~F ~ ~ ~3~'~.~ff Q~ i~17 T~F ~11~r [3F NE1l4 flF ~i~i1/~4 01 T _ ~ 1~S~a~..r ~ _
~~~tF~-~~~~ Y ~I~~+~~~~ ~~~T ~l~~~Y~~~ ~'~7 ~I~i ~~ir~~~
E~9~. ~FT DF NtT~~T ~1ET1~ t~F ~EI14 aF NI~ 114 ~ G~'~4-1 l ~ 1,.~ - - ~ ~ ~ .
~~~~~~9{7~~ ~~~469~ k~~51~1' H~L 2~=~~-44 S~~l~r N~11~4 0~ H~~L~NG I~ES~~EIf B
F~ ~ ~ Ffi 1~,~ NWYI~r ~~(C 1~1b~ EX~ 334 Of 5l6'~~~' N~3~~F~' ~~'~C ~1~~?FT ~ S I~~4 ADAMS +~Q
_ R V R A,~ 9 T ~~C C~ ~ E D L~ #~A ~4~
~ ~ _ + ~ ~
~b5~i~-~0~~' 77~}0~1~90~b ~ ~AYt~ MA1►N~hiG ~6-~~ 44 ~1~4 ~ ~I3~t3 '~A~VN~I~G f~ DAVI4 ~
- ~ 5' OF ;~1l4 OF h~E114 ~F ~11~11~r 45 1H AY - ~ ~ Nlb E ~ 16 1~ ~ l~ ~ ~ ~ ~
SPQI(ANE ~IA '~~~I~ l, 9 ~ ~ . l
~~5~~►~-~7~~r3~ 7~~~~~54bt3 !~~x F '~A ~~-~'~-44 N16~F ~F ~~1l~i [~F +~~li(ER ~ *
~ ~ ~ 1~~114 ~F N~~I~i 41~~~ ~ EXC ~ 1'~Q~ A~^A~I'S R~ , 1,...,
~ 'iJh~_da~~ Y~RA'~AL~ ~A 9~~?
~~aS~FZ"~~~4?~ ~l~O110~46 ~I C NO~~A~ 26-25~~4 ~9~~ t~F ~~~0~' tJF L3~C ~ll1 ~ ~ ~Ut s
N~~~~ (~F N~1~4 ~xC 4 ~
1 ~~~~'+~"~l1'47y ~+~'~t'j~~iWLU N~JA.~T1~~+i1 ~ LLt`~~'~4 ~~L~~ Q~ ~7I~~ ~T1~~~611~#~r RGr1 ~ r r i ~ ~ l V EC KEN!V ~ TH R o
1~~(114 ~XC I~l!~5 ~F ~~G~ ~ ~~4~ 1~~75 ~F M1'~~ ~ E C M~91.8~ ~F i4~b~~ ~~~'H )22 1bTH AVE
~4?~' Qf S1~C' ~~1~~ R~~ Y'~~A~~AL~ w~ ) ALE Wd 99037
$U~IMA~Y ~~TA: iNPUT C~4R~DS ~AR~ELS P~INT LTI~~S H~ MM
5~ ~8 ~~9 . +4t~~~ .48~~ Z9.t~n~t~
;
> ~ , ~
. . . - , . ~i . ~ - - a ~ - ~ .
. 1 ~ ~ ~ ~i~. ~ - ~
. .r _ . ~ ~ ~._r
~ ~ ~J~1 ~*'~~l
~ ~r.~~~ ~ *~.~]G~~ '3~~4s."" ~~i~ ~1'~~1'~ ~ ~~a'~ ~~L'~14~
, . Y = ~ j y~ ~ ~~rrt~~ ~~~r~ ~a '4wfA
, ~~#3~
~~~~.~~.~y.. 9'''~:i+P:~ ~r~~2~~ '~M~~~y ~~~~fy, '~t,s, n-',~~ ~~~:~~1~ayE~ ~lll ~
~ ' ,
° . * ~ ~ ° ~~L~~~'~r ~
~~'~~3- ~~~~~s ~~~:~1.~~:'.~~ , ;i~~ ~ - .~;~,fi~ ` . ' ~a~4~~~~,'q'~~~' ~'~...L, wA..
~ . ~ ~ ~ - i - r ~ `
~ r~~ ~+~I~~~ i~~ ,~'1 t t ,r I,; i ~ r~ ,~~~`;y wy~}r yy y ~ ~ ~ , ~~~~t~~ i . ► S aE 2 r~l V.
~1 ~ ~ ~ y N ~ ~ 4 t ~ . • ~ . . ~ . F _ ~ ~l I /1 i6J ~ 11 ~ ~ ' , k 7 F~ Y ~ ~ ~ •
~ li"i Mr~' t39!!~ 1.'CC n,'W~~~ Ir L
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C t~~ C~
~j~~~'~~;~C'~ ~ „w,~ .~w'?~` i~t` ~;~F~'~, ~~'r,~~, ~~k i~9'~'c~ ~f:~~,l,~~l
o ~ p ~ . , ~ ~ , t „ r - - „ . 2 ~
~ , ~ ~ , . ~ 1 r~ . . ~V° _ ~ ~ , . . , Y ~~w ~ ~I~ .
' ~ + l~~ ~~lr"~'"~~~
Ir ~ ` .y ~ ~ ~ ! • F 1'~ ' ~ ~ N ~ I _ " • r i~ • t i7' , ' " V_ Y 4 T~ ~ I+ I .1 Ir ~ 5 ~ ~ a,~ ~ l ~ V . ~ b ~ .1 ~ ~ # M v
~
~ . ~+~G~ ~ ~C~~'~~'~'~
, c ~ ~r~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ t . F . . , , E ~ ` ~ ~ ~ r 7 I :'F ~ N ~ a?P . J
J~~,~+~ ~ ~ ,17 %a3 ~ . .
~ ~ ~ ~ a~ ` ~ N ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ RI ` r1 ~ o ~ ~r ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ i ~ ~ „ ~ _ _ ~w ' Mx ~ i! ~ 'i/I n : h r JL, R h ..4t I Z' H .
~'~i ~ i I~ P'4 i7 G~ `-vcW m v
~ ~ ~Ta~ ~~'k+x+F' ~c bvtxfr r o
~ - i ' - V ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ , . , . r a~~ ~
':'~~~~w~'~~~~i ~ ~v c~►c. 14 x
~ ~~C~ °•~~bIS~ M~i
~~~~"t-~~7~' . n ~ . ; ~ . ~ e;
" ~r ~a i~'~`~~~ ~
,~'~~~~~~I', 7:_~ " ~ 4!I~ ~ ~',17; I~~ ~~1~ ~ , 1(_ J1~4 4
~t~~f:v~l'£ +~q IM "N G e r ~ ,
~ `j ,r ~
= r ~ , . ~ ~ ~ i~~'~tl~ ~s~~~4, A ; 3.,
°
' , ~
..X f i ~ J . , , ; „ - . ~ . s , ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ - i ~ . ° ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ f
s~~, ~-4~ ! ~ . , .
i
I
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
N 721 JEFFERSON
. ~e. .J . °o •
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
R ECE IV E " ''~a ; ~ ,~1 v,~, ~ -
AUG24 1978
SPOKANE COUiV i Y
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~
R. David Manning
~'o o S e Vl d' eAt' ~
.
992 r-eiur
~ •rN l~
,:SSED 4 ~ qU~ 21 ~
FoRwnRo ~ ' a. M ~ . ~
~
0 sENUER s 1973
'
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNWG DEPARTMENT
N 721 J EFFERS
ON `-D
$POKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
~ 6+UU~'7 5 ~ ° (S 1
4'(
oa-
~
!f; RE
~ ~o,~ ro ti
r
. ~
a0'i~; /t SF 0 ~
' "r~, s,~r • ~y d,o \ ,y0lc ji;'~
r(ITkADO V KENNETN R '
~ as 3~~•. ii~., "Y E 14 f~ 16 T N A V F
~ d`~•~~.~,~~~ V E ii L E W A 99037
N 6. ~ . .
r ~
26542-9049 R E C E I V E
~ r
~U G 1 8 1978
SPOKANE COUNTY '
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ ~
~
~ ~
rl ° AGENDA, ~ugust l~T~ ~'EL~pH~f~E N~. 45F-2274
5P'~1~4~1~ C~UNTY ~'L~Ni~~f~~ C~II~iSSI~N
TI~~: F~^i~ay, Au~~st 25, ~~18 ~ 8;3~ A,~.
PL~~C~: Br~adway ~en~r~ Bui~~in~, Sec~nd ~lo~r
N. 12~ J~ff~rso~~ ~at B~~adway}, SpQkane '
PREI,IM~N~RY S~I~f~IVISI~N A~I~ Z~NE RECLAS~IFI~ArIOIV
PE-120~-78 SOU~H A~~,M~ A~aITI~N =
lE ACRICUI.TURA~. T~ ~IN~~,~- ANlI ~L~ F~NI~~Y RESI~ENTIAL
a. Lacati~n: ~ect#on Township ~SN, ~t~nge 44, ~.W.M.
1'ra~t ~ 94 ~s p~r p~ ~t af Vera ~n ~f~ 1 e i n
~ Voium~ ~"~k~ at ~age ~0 of Pla~ts ~r~ the ~,ffic~ af the Audit~r in 5~~~~n~ C~unty, Washing~an
b. ~porrsar: Brent ~cKinley
Tr~nsw~st~rn Reaity
~I, ~~14 ~in~s Rd., S~ite 3 Spokan~, 99~1~
c. 5~rveyvr: Gera~d Mas~ai
E. 9~03 ~prague
Sp~~Can~, WA, 99~06
d. ~~t~ Size. ~.58 ac~^~es
~um~er~ of L~t~: ~7' ~ots Propos~d ~~nd I~se: 5ingle Fam~~y ar~d dupiexes
g. Existing ~a~ning: ~gr~cultur~l
h. Pr~pased Z~nin~: 5ingle- ~n~ Two Fami~y Resid~ntial
i. ~at~r Sa~urce: U~era '~a~er a~d Pawer
j. Sc~ool Uistri~ct: ~entral Ual~~y #356
k. Me~hoci of Sewa~e Di~p~a~~1: I~r~i~vi~dual or~-si~e systems
1. Environmental Im~ac~.: A~ to,~ic of disc~ssic~~ a~ this he~rin~ ~y b~
wt~~ther ~or ~a~t thi S pr~t~p~sa~l wi 11 hav~ gr~i ~i cant acive~se envi ror~m~ntal im~act.
i
NT ~F ` {~1~
~ ~ ~ ~
I
~ ~
~j~ ~'r+~ ! ~ f~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~ ~
~
~
~
~
~ ~
, y~_
~
I