PE-1206-78 & ZE-202-78
S dM OrpoKane
Va~.le
y
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhallCspokanevalley.org
March 7, 2006
Mr. Ken Tupper
KJT Investments, LLC
122 North Raymond Road
Spokane, Washington 99206
RE: Notice of Decision for Extension of Time for Preliminary Plat Approval for Summerfield
East Prelimioary Plat (PE-1206-78)
Dear Mr. Tupper:
The City of Spokane Valley Plan.ning Division received your request for an extension of time on
January 19, 2006 for an additional one-year time extension in order to complete Summerfield East
7th Addition Final Plat (City of Spokane Va11ey Reference No. PE-1206-78). The site is identified
by Parcel Nos. 46352.9052, 46352.9066, 46352.9014, 46351.9049, 46351.9005, 46353.9126 and
46354.9127; located southeast of Forker Road, south and west of Progress Road, approximately
1300 feet north of Wellesley Avenue, in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East Willamette
Meridian, Spokane County, Washington.
Preliminary plat approval for PE 1206-78 (Sum.merfield East) was originally granted on January 30,
1979. This current request represents the fourteenth extension request for the previously approved
preliminary plat. In your current request, you specify that additional time is needed in order to
accommodate two studies tlaat are being done by FEMA and Spokane County, respectively for a
possible revision of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and a road study. Intended completion and
recording of Summerfield East 7th Addition is pending the completion of these studies. The sixth
phase (Summerfield East 60 Addition) was recorded on March 11, 2005 and there is an additional
ninety (68) lots to be finalized including tbe 7hAddition.
The City of Spokane Valley has completed a substantive review of your proposal pursuant to the
applicable regulations of Chapter 12.100.118 (Extensions of Tune) of the City of Spokane Valley
Interim Subdivision Ordinance, and has also routed the request to appropriate internal and extemal
review bodies. Pursuant to the submitted information, it is determined that the applicant meets the
criteria for allowance of an extension of time according to 12.100.118(2)(b). You are hereby
notified that your request for an extension of time is APPROVED subject to the following
conditions of approval:
l. This letter grants a maximum one (1) year time extension from the date of this letter. The
preliminary plat approval for PE-1206-78 (Sum.merfield East Preliminary Plat) shall
therefore expire on March 7, 2006.
2. For additional extensions of time an application form and supporting data for time extension
must be subnutted at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the expiration of the preliminary
, plat approval extension request.
~
I
~ Please be advised that all conditions of approval from the original prel.iminary plat approval and a11
' previously authorized time extensions are still applicable.
Pursuant to Section 12.100.126 (Appeals) of the City's adopted "Subdivision Ordinance, a written
appeal of this Notice of Decision shall be filed with the City of Spokane Valley Community
Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date the notice of the decision
is mailed. The appeal deadline is at 5:00 pm on March 21, 2006.
Pursuant to Section 7 of Ordinance No. 57, the Hearings Examiner shall conduct a public hearing on
appeals of administrative decisions made by the Current Planning Division. Pursuant to Section 11
of Ordinance 03-081, the Hearings Examiner's decision on the appeal sha11 be final and conclusive
and shall have the effect of a final decision of the City Council.
Please conta.ct me at (509) 688-0046 or hstinson@spokanevalley.org if you have any questions or
need additional information.
Sincerely,
HEATHER STINSON
Planni.ng Techniciaa
CC: City of Spokane Va11ey Public Works Department - Alysa Wiyrick
City of Spokane Valley Bu.ilding Department - Mike Turbak
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Information Services - Jim Red
Spokane County A.ir Pollution Control Authority - Ron Edgar
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health District - Don Copley
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District
Encl: 14th Extension of Time for Preluninary Approvalletter dated January 19, 2006
go ft
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
'I INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: February 28, 2006
TO: Heather Kauer, Planning Technician, City of Spokane Valley Department
of Community Development
FROM: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHD
SUBJECT: PE-1206-78 Summerfield East - Extension of Time
The Spokane Regional Health District does not object to the extension of time for the
above referenced plat.
I
~
N Go
To: Heather Kauer (City of Spokane Valley - Community Development)
CC:
From: Jim Red (Spokane County - Division of Utilities)
Date: Monday, February 27, 2006
~ Subject: PE-1206-78 Stage: Extension of Time Phase: SV
'I SUMMERFIELD EAST
FA14 The Spokane County Division of Utilities has no new comments for the above project All
previous conditions apply.
I
041
crnar~'ne COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
,;o*Valley DIVISION OF PLANNING
COVER MEMORANDUM
Date: February 14, 2006
To: City of Spokane Valley Engineering Department
City of Spokane Valley Building Department - Mike Turbak
Spokane County Division of Utilities -lnformation Services; Jun Red
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health District - Don Copley
Trentwood Irrigation District
From: Heather Kauer, Planning Technician
11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Va11ey, WA 99206
PH: 509.688.0046
FX: 509.688.0037
E-MAIL: hkauer(@snokanevallev.ore
SUBJECT: Extension for Preliminary Plat Approval for Summerfield East (PE-1206-78)
The City of Spokane Valley is requesting your comments in regards to approving an extension
for Summerfield East (PE-1206-78). Should the time extension be approved, the preliminary
plat approval will be extended to March 1, 2007.
Please review and submit written comments via mail, facsimile or mail by Februarv 28,
2006 to the attention of the staff person identified above.
Attachments: Time Extension Application
11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 •(509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008
° RECEIVED
~ JAN I ~1o 29CE
sPQMN'E VAELE~~
DE~'A~TMELT OFCITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY COMMUNen' DEVEI ~?n,7ENT
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
DIVISION OF PLANNING
NAME OF PLAT/FILE NO: Summerfield East, PE-1206-78
PARCEL NO: 46352 9052: 46352 9066. 46352.9014, 46351.9049, 46351.9005; 46353 9126; 46354 9127
APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL OWNER): KiTbivestinentsEE6. Kenneth J Tuaner. Five Fif ty, LLC
MAILINC ADDRESS: 122 N. Ravmond Rd,
CITY: Spokane Vallev STATE: Washina-ton ZIP: 99206
PHONE: (work) 922 1211 (home) (fax) 922 0195
[F APPLICANT IS NOT TH_E OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR
THE BELOW OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: Same
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PHONE: (work) (home) (fax)
1. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized (recorded)?
Yes. See Attached
2. Has aproposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Planning?
Yes No X If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized
What has been the delay?
See Attached
3.What progress has occurred: What conditions of approval have been completed (such as surveying
work, improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)?
See Attached
~
Attacbment to Application of Extension of Time
Summerfield East, PE 1206-78
Historv of Plat Approval
The preliminary plat of Summerfield East was approved for development of
approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings. The developer has
continually developed the property since it was granted preliminary plat approval. In
1984, "Summerfield East," consisting of 28 lots was recorded with the Spokane County
Auditor. Also in 1984, "Summerfield East First Addition," consisting of 53 lots was
recorded with the Spokane County Auditor. In 1985, "Summerfield East Second
Addition," consisting or 19 lots was finalized and recorded. In 1987, "Summerfield East
Third Addition," consisting of 34 lots was finalized and recorded. "Summerfield East
Fourth Addition," consisting of 251ots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor in
October, 2002. In 2004, "Summerfield East Fifth Addition," consisting of 191ots was
finalized and recorded.
ProRress Since Last Time Extension
Since the last time extension granted on February 24, 2005, one additional phase,
"Summerfield East Sixth Addition," consisting of 221ots was finalized and recorded on
March 11, 2005. With the recordation of Summerfield East Sixth Addition, there are
only 68 lots to be finalized.
Anticipated Pro2ress
The applicant is unable to complete any work on additional phases until two
pending studies are completed by governmental agencies. First, Spokane County and
FEMA are conducting a study of the boundary of Flood Zone A, which affects a portion
of Summerfield. The County has indicated the boundary of Flood Zone A is smaller than
shown on maps. Second, Spokane County is conducfiing a study related to the
construction of a new "beltway" corridor, connecting the Spokane Valley with North
Spokane County. The County has indicated the beltway may bisect a portion of the
remaining property in Summerfield. The applicant cannot design any additional phases
because lot and road alignments are dependent upon the location of the beltway and
Flood Zone A. The applicant acknowledges that potentially 5 to 12 lots could be platted
in Flood Zone B, but the configuration and layout of any further lots is still dependant
upon the location of the beltway. Until these studies are complete, the applicant is unable
to proceed with additional phases.
The remaining property remains consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the property as Low Density Residential. The property remains zoned
Urban Residential-3.5.
Based upon the above, the plat sponsor respectfully requests a time extension in
order to allow Spokane County and FEMA to complete its studies, and further, to allow
the applicant to finalize the remaining acreage of Summerfield East.
J
~ •
4. ls this a phased project? Yes. X No. If yes, please complete the following information:
No. of lots originally approved: 268 No. of lots remaining to be finalized to date: 68
No. of phases tinalized to date: 7 No. of acres remaining to date:
LEGAL OWNER SICNATURE
(Signature of IegAI owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
I `e , (print name) SWEAR OR AFFTRM THAT
THE ABOVE RESPON S AR%~ADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
1 FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THC OWIYER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE ABOVE IDENTTFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZIh'G MY ACTIONS ON
HiS/WER BEHALF.
ADDRESS: PHONE:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
SICNATURE DATE
1
NOTARY
STA'I'E OF WASHNGTON )ss
CI7'Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY)
SUBSCRIBFD A ' to before me this day of , 20 01D
NO"'ARY S. ~Q
V 140TARy NOTARY SIGNAT
...W 0
(P~pUBL1C O~1 ry Public in and for the State of Washmgton
~ 0
8" ~cResiding at *W46z4 4~ .4
~F tNA~'r''' .
s
My appomtment expires
DATE SUBMITTED RECEIVED BY ,A
AMOLINT IZECEIVED RFCEIP1' NO
SCil'''p6koa* n e
..;,oOValley
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
February 28, 2007
Mr. Ken Tupper
KJT investments, LLC
122 North Raymond Road
Spokane, Washington 99206
RE: Notice of Decision for Extension of Time for Preliminary Plat Approval for Summerfield
East Preliminary Plat (PE-1206-78)
Dear Mr. Tupper:
The City of Spokane Valley Planning Division received your request for an extension of time on
January 16, 2007 #or an additional extension in order to complete Summeffield East 7t" Addition
Final Plat (City of Spokane Valley, Reference No. PE-1206-78). The site is identified by Parcel Nos.
46352 9052, 46352.9066, 46352 9014, 46351.9049, 46351 9005, 46353 9126 and 46354.9127,
located southeast of Forker Road, south and west of Progress Road, approximately 1300 feet north
of Wellesley Avenue, in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East Willamette Meridian,
Spokane County, Washington.
Preliminary plat approval for PE 1206-78 (Summerfield East) was originally granted on January 30,
1979. This current reques# represents the fifteenth extension request for the previously approved
preliminary plat In your current request, you specify that additional time is needed in order to
accommodate two studies that are being done by FEMA and Spokane County, respectively for a
possible revision of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps and a road study. Intended completion and
recording of Summeffield East 7th Addition- is- pending the completion of these studies. The sixth
phase (Summerfield East 60 Addition) was r~eeorded on March 11, 2005 and there are an additional
68 lots to be finalized including the 7t' Addition
The City of Spokane Valley has completed a substantive review of your proposal pursuant to the
applicable regulations- of Chapter 12.100-118 (Ex#ensions of Time) of the City of Spokane Valley
Interim Subdivision Ordinance, and has also routed the request to appropriate internal and external
review bodies. Pursuant to the submitted information, it is determined that the applicant meets the
cnteria for allowance of an extension of time according to 12.100.118(1). Your request for an
extension of time is APPROVED subject to the following:
1. The preliminary plat approval is extended until ninetv davs following the final approval by
FEMA of any revisions to the floodplain maps resulting from review of the Forker Draw
affecting this property
2. This is the final extension.
s
All conditions of approval from the original preliminary plat approval and all previously authorized
time extensions are still applicable.
Pursuant to Section 12.100.126 (Appeals) of the City's adopted "Subdivision Ordinance, a written
appeal of this Notice of Decision shall be filed with the City of Spokane Valley Community
Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date the notice of the
decision is mailed. The appeal deadline is at 5:00 pm on March 21, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 7 of Ordinance No. 57, the Hearings Examiner shall conduct a public hearing
on appeals of admtnistrative- deeisions made by the Current Plannmg Division. Pursuant to Section
11 of Ordinance 03-081, the Hearings Examiner's decision on the appeal shall be final and
conclusive and shall have the effect of a final decision of the City Council.
Please contact me at (549) 688-0030 or msukup@spokanevalley.org if you have any questions or
need additional information.
Sincerely,
. .
MARINA M. SUKUP, AICP, CFM,
Director
CC: City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department - Alysa Wiyrick
City of Spokane Valtey Building Department - Mike Turbak
Spokane County Division of Utilities, Information Services - Jim Red
Spokane-Eounty Air PoNution ControE Authority - Ron Edgar
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health District - Don Copley
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIM
AIVIS(ON OF PLANNINC v
IL a j J
NAIVLE OF PLAT/FILE 1V0: Summerfield East. NE-1206-78
PARCEL NO: 46353 9074. 46354 9050, 46352 9052, 46352 9066, 46351 9049 ~
APPLICANT (NAME OF LFCAL pWNER): 1=ive f=iftv LLC Kenneth.I Tupper
MA1L1lVG ADDRESS: 122 N Ravmond Rd,
C[TY: Spokane Vallev STATE: Washinaton Z(P: 99206
PHONE: (work) 922 1211 (home) (fax) 922 0195
IF APPLICANT 1S NOT THE OWNEIt, IIVCLUDF WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR
THE BELOW OWIVER'S UESIGNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
OWNER'S DESIGNATEll COIVTACT:
MAILINC ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIP:
PHONE: (work) (home) (fax)
1. Has any partion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized (recorded)?
Yes, See Attached
2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been subrnitted to the Division of Planning?
Yes X No If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized
What has been the delay?
3.What progress has occurred: What conditions of approval have been completed (such as su worlc,
improvements canstructed, departmental approvals obtained)?
See Attached
4. Is this a phased project? Yes. X No. If yes, please complete the following information:
No. of lots originally approved: 268 No. of lots remaining to be fnalized to date: 68
No. of phases finalized to date: 7 No. of acres remaining to date:
LECAL OWNCR SIGIYATURE
(Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
I, (print name) SWEAR OR AFFiRM THAT
THE ABOVE RESPOARE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST O1+ MY KNOWLCDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFC'lRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE AC1'ION, OR, IH, YOT THE OWNER, t1TTACFIED
HEREWITH IS Wl2ITTE\T PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING Ml' ACTIONS ON
HIS/1-(ER [3EHALF.
ADDRESS: 122 N Raymond Suite 3 PHONE: 509-924-1211
CITY: Spokane Valley STATE: WA Z'P: 99216
ICNA ~ DATE
Xx)
\ 1
NOTARY
S"1'ATE OF WASI-IINGTON )ss
C1"I'Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY)
clay of . 20 O 7
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to bcfore me this_/,5' ziz
NOTARY SF;
~r
NOTARY SIGNATU
v~~ r N ry Public in and for the State ot Washington
..•2
AUBV,~
iding at AL,uJ -,,djaet .
OF WASa~
~ My appointment e,\piret
DATE SUBMITTED RECEIVED F3Y
AMOUNT RECEIVED ` ~ RCCLIP`I' NO ~ /
Attachment to Application for Eatension of Time
Summerfield East, PE 1206-78
Historv of Plat Apnroval
The preliminary plat of Summerfield East was approved for the development of
approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings. The developer has
continually developed the property since it was granted preliminary plat approval. In
1984, Summerfield East First Addition, consisting of 53 lots was recorded with the
Spokane County Auditor. In 1985, Summerfield East Second Addition, consisting of 19
lots was finalized and recorded In 1987, Summerfield East Third Addition, consisting of
34 lots was finalized and recorded. Summerfield East Fourth Addition, consisting of 25
lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor in October, 2002. In 2004
Suinmerfield East Fiftl1 Addition consisting of 19 lots was finalized and recorded.
Summerfield East Sixth Addition, consisting of 22 lots was finalized and recorded in
March of 2005.
Circumstances Since Last Tijne Fxtension
Since the last time extension was granted in 2006, two governmental studies
affecting the remaining lots are progressing but remain unfinished. The applicant is
unable to complete the remaining 68 lots until these pending governmental studies are
completed. The two goverrunental studies are a Flood Zone study of Forker Draw and its
adjacent flood plain being conducted by FEMA and Spokane County. The preliminary
indications are that the boundary of Flood 7one A which affects a portion of the 68
remaining lots in Summerfield East may be reduced, thereby providing for buildable lots.
The second study is related to the proposed construction of a new "beltway" corridor by
Spokane County. The l3eltway would connect Spokane Valley witli North Spokane
County. The County has indicated that one option for the beltway may bisect a portion of
the remaining 68 lots in Summerfield East. At the present time the applicant cannot
submit a final plat design for the remaining 68 lots because road alignments and lot
locations axe dependent upon the location of the beltway and the boundary of Flood Zone
A. The applicant is advised that the Flood Zone study and the beltway alignment study
are scheduled to be completed during 2007.
The 68 renzaining lots are consistent with Comprehensive Plan presently
designated as "Low Density Residential" and consistent with the Zoning Code, zoned
UR-3.5.
Based upon the above, the plat sponsor respectfully requests a time extension in
order to allow Spokane County and FEMA to complete their respective studies, and
further, to allow the applicant to finalize the remaining 68 lots of Sunlmerfield East.
0100 ~
Spm()j4jne
e ly
11707 E. Sprague Ave. • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA 99206
(509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org
February 24, 2005
Mr. Ken Tupper
KJT Investments, LLC
122 North R.aymond Road
Spokane, Washingtoo 99206
RE: Notice of Decision for Eatension ot Time for Preliminary Plat Approval for Summer5eld
East Preliminary Plat (PE-1206-78)
Dear Mr. Tupper:
T'he City of Spokane Valley Planning Division received your request for an extension of time on
January 24, 2005 for an additional one-year time extension in order to complete Summerfield East
6'' Addition Final Plat (City of Spokane Valley Reference No. PE-1206-78). The site is identified
by Parcel Nos. 46354.9050, 46353.9074, 46352.9052, 46352.9066, and 46351.9049; located west of
Burns Road, north of Queen Avenue, approximately 250 feet east of Bannen Road, aad
approximately 500 feet south of Forker Avenue in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East
Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington
Preliminary plai approval for PE 1206-78 (Sutnmerfield East) was originally granted on January 30,
1979. This current request represents the thirteenth extension request for the previously approved
preliminary plat. In your curnent request, you specify that additional time is needed to complete final
grading of swales and lots prior to receiving final plat approval for the sixth phase (Summerfield
East 6th Addition) consisting of twenty-two (22)-lots. Intended completion and recording of
Summerfield East e Addition is forecasted for 2005. The fifth phase (Summerfield East 5th
Addition) was recorded on January 30, 2004 and there is an additional ninety (90) lots to be finalized
including the 6`h Addition.
The City of Spokane Valley has completed a substantive review of your proposal pursuant to the
applicable regulations of Chapter 12.100.118 (Extensions of Time) of the City of Spokane Valley
Interim Subdivision Ordi.nance, and has also routed the request to appropriate internal and external
review bodies. Pursuant to the submitted information, it is determined that the applicant meets the
criteria for allowance of an extension of time according to 12.100.118(2)(b). You are hereby
notified t.hat your request for an extension of time is APPROVED subject to the following
conditions of approval:
I.etter !o Ken Tupper. -
RE: Ezlension of Time for PE-1206-78 (Sunrnrerfield Eart Preliminary Pla#
February 24, 2005
1. This letter grants a maximum one (1) year time extension from the date of this letter. The
pretiminary plat approval for PE-1206-78 (Summerfield East Preliminary Plat) sball
therefore expire on February 24, 2006.
2. For additional extensions of time an application fonn and supporting data For time extension
must be submitted ai least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the expiration of the preliminary
plat approval exteasion request.
Please be advised that all conditions of approval from the origina] preliminary plat approval and all
previously authorized time extensions are still applicable.
Pursuant to Section 12.100.126 (Appeals) of the City's adopted "Subdivision Ordinance, a writGen
appeal of this Notice of Decision shall be filed with the City of Spokane Valley Community
Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date the notice of the decision
is mailed. The appeal deadline is at 5:00 pm on March 10, 2005.
Pursuant to Section 7 of Ordinance No. 57, the Hearings Examiner shall conduct a public hearing on
appeals of administrative decisions made by the Curnent Planning Division. Pursuant to Section 11
of Ordinance 03-081, the Hearings Examiner's decision on the appeal shall be final and conclusive
and shall have the effect of a final decision of the City Council.
Please contact me at (509) 688-0172 or kkendall@spokanevalley.org if you have any questions or
need additional information.
Y. Sincere ,
N E. KEN L
Assistant Planner
CC: City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department - Sandra Raskell
City of Spokane Valley Building Department - Dawn Dompier
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Information Services - Jim Red
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority - Ron Edgar
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health District - Don Copley
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District
Encl: 12'h Extension of Time for Preliminary Approval letter dated March 23, 2004
Page 2 of 2
~ Page 1 of 1
Karen Kendall
From: Hopkins, Leslie [LHopkins@spokanecounty.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3-11 PM
To: Karen Kendall
2/17/ 2005
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
1NTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: February 16, 2005
TO: Karen Kendall, Assistant Planner, City of Spokane Valley Dept. of Community
Development
FROM: Donald Copley, EHS II - EHD, SRHD
SUBJECT: Time Extension PE-1206-78 Summerfield East 6`'' Addition
The Spokane Regional Health District has no objection to the proposed Extension of Time for
the above-referenced plat.
Memo/PL-1206-78 Summerfield East 6' Add/Ih
Karen Kendall
From: Red, Jim [JRed@spokanecounty.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2005 5 16 PM
To: Karen Kendall
Subject: Project: PE-1206-78
or
r PA Comments.rtf
- - (1 KB) «r PA Comments.rtf»
i
To: Karen Kendall (City of Spokane Valley)
CC:
From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date: Wednesday, February 02, 2005
Subject: PE-1206-78 Stage: Extension of Time Phase: SV
SUMMERFIELD EAST
FA14 The Spokane County Division of Utilities has no new comments for the above project All
previous conditions apply.
Srn'6l
pine COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
,;oOValley PLANNING DIVISION
ROUTING MEMORANDUM
Date: January 26, 2005
To: City of Spokane Valley Public Works Department - Sandra Raskell
City of Spokane Valley Building Division -Tom Scholtens/Dawn Dompier
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Information Services; Jim Red
Spokane County Fire District No. Kevin Miller
Spokane Reglonal Health District - Don Copley
Avista - Claude Kaler
Qwest - Don Hartzog
Comcast - Rich BarnesBryan Richardson
SEFNCO Communications (Consultant to Comcast) - Robert Braun
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District
From: Karen E. Kendall, Assistant Planner
11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
PH: 509.688.0172
FX: 509.921.1008
E-MAIL: kkendall@spokanevalley.org
SUBJECT: Time Extension Request for Summerfield East 6`h Addition (PE-1206-78)
The City of Spokane Valley is requesting your comments in regards to approving a thirteenth
time extension for Summerfield East 6th Addition (PE-1206-78). Should the time extension be
approved, the preliminary plat approval will be extended for one (1) year from the date of the
decision.
Please review the attached material and submit written comments via mail, facsimile or
mail by Februarv 16, 2005 at S:OOpm to the attention of the staff person identified above.
11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 - (509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008
c ~ RECEIVED
~ ~ 205
sPaKANE vaLLEv CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
D-PARTMER9T C)F APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
CC3~SNdUN1TY DFVEo,9?^~E'VT
DIVISION OF PLANNINC
NAME OF PLAT/FILE NO: Summerfield EasLPE-1206-78
PARCEL NO: 46353.9074; 46354.9050; 46352.9052: 46352.9066; 46351.9049.
APPL1CAivT (NAME OF LEGAL OWNER): KJT Investments LLC. Kenneth J. Tupper
MALLING ADDRESS: 122 N. Ravmond Rd,
CITY: Sqokane Vallev STATE: WashinQton ZIP: 99206
PHONE: (work) 922 1211 (home) (fax) 922 0195
iF APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, TNCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR
THE BELOW OWNER'S DESiCNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
OWlYER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT:
MAILING ADDRESS:
C1TY: STATE: ZIP:
i'HONE: (work) (home) (fax)
1. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized (recorded)?
Yes. See Attached.
2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Planning?
Yes X fVo If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized
What has been the delay?
3.What progress has occurred: What conditions of approval have been completed (such as su work,
improvemeiits constructed, departmental approvals obtained)?
See Attached.
/
? 4. Is this a phased project? Yes. X No. If yes, please comnlete the following information:
No. of lots originally approved: 268 No. of lots remaining to be finalized to date: 90
No. of phases tinalized to date: 6 No. of acres remaining to date:
LEGAL OWNER SiCNATURE
(Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
(print oame) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT
THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MbtTRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
1 FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM TNE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA PROPOSED
FOR THE ABOVE LDEN7'IFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHED
HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FR4M TAE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS ON
H1S/HER BEHALF.
ADDRESS:-, C PHONE:
Y
CITY: S STATE: Z[P:
~
STG AT E DATE
NOTARY
STATC OF WASHINGTON )ss
CI'I'Y OF SPOKANE VALLEY)
ti
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to befare me this day of 20 O~
N4TARY SEAL ~
HFci? '
.\SS10N NOTA GNATURH
NOTARY ~~Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
: U
PUBLIC j Residing at:
9~C~ •~A~~NG
. My appomtment expires O"7
DATE SUI3MITTED ~!Z4 IO 5 RECF.IVL'D BY h
AMOUN? RECEIVED RECFIPT NO
Attachment to Application of Extension of Time
Summerfield East, PE 1206-78
The preliminary plat of Summerfield East was approved for development of
approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings. The developer has
continually developed the property since it was granted preliminary plat approval. In
1984, "Summerfield East," consisting of 281ots was recorded with the Spokane County
Auditor. Also in 1984; "Summerfield East First Addition," consisting of 53 lots was
recorded with the Spokane County Auditor. In 1985, "Summerfield East Second
Addition," consisting or 19 lots was finalized and recorded. In 1987, "Summerfield East
Third Addition," consisting of 341ots was finalized and recorded. "Summerfield East
Fourth Addition," consisting of 25 lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor in
October; 2002. In 2004, "Summerfield East Fifth Addition," consisting of 19 lots was
finalized and recorded. In total, 178 of the original 268 lots have been finalized.
The next phase, "Summerfield East Sixth Addition," consisting of 221ots was
constructed in 2004, but awaits final grading of swales and lots. All other improvements
have been installed. Final grading will be completed when weather permits. The final
plat of "Summerfield East Sixth Addition" will be recorded later this year (2005).
The remaining property remains consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan,
which designates the property as Low Density Residential. The property remains zoned
Urban Residential-3.5.
The plat sponsor respectfully requests a time extension in order to finalize the
remaining acreage of Summerfield East.
s poKanie
Valle
y
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valtey WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
March 23, 2004
Mr. Ken Tupper
8225 North Division Street
Spokane, Washington 99204
RE: Notice of Decision for Extension of Time for Preliminary Plat Approval for
Summerfield East Preliminary Plat
Dear Mr. Tupper:
The Current Planning Division received your Extension of Time Application on
December 22, 2003 for a proposed one year tune extension for Summerfield East 6th
Acfdinon Final Plat (City of Spokane Valley Reference No. PE-1206-78) located west of
Burns Road, north of Olympic Avenue, approximately 250 feet east of Bannen Road, and
approximately 500 feet south of Forker Avenue in the South Half of Section 35,
Township 26 North, Range 44 East Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington,
tax parcel numbers 46354.9050, 46353.9074, 46352.9052, 46352.9066, and 46351.9049.
Preliminary plat approval for PE 1206-78 (Summerfield East) was originally granted on
January 30, 1979. This current request represents the twelfth extension request for the
previously approved preliminary plat. In your current extension request application, you
specify that the basis for your request is due to the fact there is an additional 109 lots to
be platted under the preliminarythe fifth phase (Summerfield East 51h Addition) was
recorded on January 30, 2004 and additional time is needed to proceed with final platting
for the sixth phase (Sununerfield East 6th Addition) consisting of twenty-two (22)-lots.
The City of Spokane Valley has completed a substantive review of your proposal
pursuant to the applicable regulations of Chapter 12.100.118 (Extensions of Tune) of the
City of Spokane Valley Interim Subdivision Ordinance, and has also routed the request to
appropriate internal and external review bodies. Pursuant to the submitted information, it
is detennined that the applicant meets the criteria for allowance of an extension of time
according to 12.100.118(2)(b). You are hereby notified that your request for an extension
of time is A.PPROVED subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. This letter grants a maximum one (1) year time extension from the date of this letter.
The preliminary plat approval for PE-1206-78 (Summerfield East Prelirninary Plat)
shall therefore expire on March 23, 2005.
~
-1
2. For additional extensions of time an application form and supporting data for time
extension must be submitted at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the expiration
of the preliminary plat approval extension request.
Please be advised that all conditions of approval from the original preliminary plat
approval and all previously authorized time extensions are still applicable.
Pursuant to Section 12.100.126 (Appeals) of the City's adopted "Subdivision Ordinance,
a written appeal of this Notice of Decision shall be filed with the City of Spokane Valley
Community Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date
the notice of the decision is mailed. The appeal deadline is at 5:00 pm on April 6th,
2004.
Pursuant to Section 7 of Ordinance No. 57, the Hearings Examiner shall conduct a public
hearing on appeals of administrative decisions made by the Current Planning Division.
Pursuant to Section 11 of Ordinance 03-081, the Hearings Examiner's decision on the
appeal shall be final and conclusive and shall have the effect of a final decision of the
City Council.
Please contact me at (509) 688-0046 or hkauer@spokanevalley.org if you have any
questions or need additional infonnation.
Sincerely,
Heather Kauer
Planning Technician
CC: USKH, Lisa Frey
City of Spokane Valley Engineering Department
John Hohman, P.E. Senior Engineer
■ Sandra Raskell, P.E., Assistant Engineer
■ Don Ramsey, Traffic Engineer
City of Spokane Valley Building Department - Tom Scholtens
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Information Services; Jim Red
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority - Ron Edgar
Spokane County Transit Authority - Gordon Howell
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health District - Steve Holderby
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District
Encl: 12th Extension of Time for Preliminary Approval letter dated March 23, 2004.
, DEC 13 2003 16:08 FR TO 4582717 P.02i0
"4
~C,
. j
RECEIVED
CITY oF spoKANE vALLEY ~ ~ ~ ~zin
APPLIC,A►.TION FQR EX'TENSIUN ClF SPaxANc vALlF-v
oEPARTMEN7' OF
bY'VYSION OF PLANNIIVG CR"nZ Jk"'I'v ~~V-F°_~~~~~~-r
1vAME OFPLAT/FILE NU: Summerfield East; PE - 1206-78
PARCEL N0:46353.9074; 46354.9050; 46352.9052; 46352.9066; 46351.9049
APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL UWNER): KJT Inve s tment s LLC
NAYI,IlYGpDD12.E55; 122 N. Raymond, STE 3
CY7^y; Spokane STATE: WA ZIP; 99206
PHONE: (vYOrk) (home) {fax) 922-0195
YF APPLYCANT I►S NOr Z'HE OW1vT1R, INCLTJDE WRITTEN aWNER AUTHORIZATIOAt FOR
THE sELovv avvrFR'S DESIGNATED CONTACT T4 SERVE A,5 REPMENTATIVE
4WNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: Ken Tupper
MAII.ING AI)DRESS: 122 N. Raymond, STE. 3
CrrY: Spokane STA1'E:WA ZIP; 99206
PHUNE: (work) (home) (fax)
1. Hae any portion of the plat, short ptat or BSP been finalind (recorded)?
See attached
2. Has aproposed fmal plat, short pIat or BSF been submitted to the Division of Planning?
Xes X No if no, why has the P1aE, short plat or BSP not been finalized?
R'hat has been the delay?
See attached
3.What progress bas pccurred: What condiiions of approvaI have been completed (sach as survey
work, improvementg construeted, deparbmental approvals obtained)?
Cattac e
,7k
1
L~. ^ .
~ i. ~
SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF ,
CnMMiJNITY DEVELOPMENT
, DEC 13 2003 16:08 FR TO 4582?1? P.03/04
• v ~
4. Is this a phaeed prvject? Yes x No Jf yes, please cumptete the following information:
No. of lots orfgin$IYy approved: 268 No. of phases finalized to d$te: 5
Na. oflots remaining to be finalized:109 No. of acres remaining to date: 40
LEGAL OWNER SIGNATLTRE
. (Signsture of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
i,Kennith Tupper ,(print eame) SV1EAP. O1ZAF'FIRM THAT
THE AB4VE RESPONSES ARE 1ViADE TRUTHFULILY AND TU TM BE5T OF M'Y KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTAER SWEAR OR AFP'IRM THAT I AM T'HE OWNER UF R,ECORD OIF THE AIMA PROPOSED
FOR THE ABOVE IDENTBUD LAND USE AGTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, A1TACHEA
flEREW1TH IS WRTTTEN PERNiISSION FROM'THE OWNER AUT'HORIMG MY ACTIONS UN
HIS/HER BEHALF.
ADDRE,SS:KJT Investments 122 N. Raymond STE, 3 pgONE:
C=: Spokane STATE: WA ZEN 99206
SIGNA'I'UR9 ~ DATE
\
,
xarAxxY
STATE QF WASHNGTpN )ss:
CXTY OF SPOKAN$ VALLEY) .
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to bcforc mc this c day of 20 4V
NOTARY SEAi.
~
N'CYARrVGNA1`UILE
.
~ , . i
`.~`~Q.~',.•~~''••.~ 4'~ Plotary Public in and for the Statc of Washington
,co.;
, .
=
_ : +p AR r = = Residing at: , G ,.S /l l ((CA ~
= .
~J
)
~,,~j► • .'~4 10.....• Ivfy appointmcnt cxpires:
~,~~~~1 f • ' ' .
~/►II I I I Itl1t1
DA'IE SUBM7TTED: RECEIVED BY:
AMbiINT RECENED:, REGEIPTNO:
/
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
SUMMERFIELD EAST; PE 1206-78
ATTACHNIENT
The preliminary plat of SummerField East was approved for development of
approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings. The developer has continually
developed the property since it was granted preliminary plat approval. In 1984, "Summerfield
East," consisting of 28 lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor. Also in 1984,
"Summerfield East First Addition," consisting of 53 lots was recorded with the Spokane County
Auditor. In 1985, "Summerfield East Second Addition," consisting of 19 lots was finalized and
recorded. ln 1987, "Summerfield East Third Addition," consisting of 34 lots was recorded.
"Summerfield East Fourth Addition," consisting of 25 lots was recorded with the Spokane
County Auditor in October, 2002. In total, 159 of the 268 lots have been finalized.
The next phase, "Summerfield East Fifth Addition," consisting of 19 lots has been
reviewed and approved the City and is ready for recording with the Spokane County Auditor.
All field work has been completed, inspected and bonded for. The developer is also presently
completing "Summerfield East Sixth Addition," which consists of 22 lots. All engineering work
has been completed for the Sixth Addition, plans have been signed by Spokane County and the
City of Spokane Valley, and the phase is expected to be finalized and recorded during 2004,
however, the applicant may elect to finalize the Sixth Addition at a later date based on market
demand. In that case, the applicant may need to seek an additional time extension.
The remaining unplatted property remains consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Plan, which designates the property as Low Density Residential. The property is still zoned
Urban Residential-3.5.
.
The plat sponsor respectfully requests a time extension in order to finalize the remaining
acreage of Summerfield East.
G 111Tupjxx Krn 856061Summcrfield 21Attnchment to Extension of Time 2003 wpd
Sp6llne
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Valley CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
COVER MEMORANDUM
REViEVYED FOR ~IPLIANCE
SPOKANE VA' - ;lLI VISION
Date: February 24, 2004
To: City of Spokane Valley Engineering Department
■ John Hohman, P.E. Senior Engineer
• Sandra Raskell, P.E., Assistant Engineer
' ■ Don Ramsey, Traffic Engineer
City of Spokane Valley Building Department - Tom Scholtens
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Information Services; Jim Red
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority - Ron Edgar
Spokane County Transit Authority - Gordon Howell
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health District - Steve Holderby
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District
From: Heather Kauer
11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
PH: 509.688.0046
FX: 509.688.0037
E-MAIL: hkauer@spokanevalley.org
SUBJECT: Extension of Time Request for Summerfield East 6th Addition: PE-
1206-78
The City of Spokane Valley is requesting your comments in regards to approving a
twelfth time extension for Summerfield East 6t' Addition (PE-1206-78). Should the time
extension be approved, the preliminary plat approval will be extended to March 11,
2005.
Please review and submit written comments via mail, facsimile or mail by March
9th, 2004 to the attention of the staff person identified above.
Attachments: Time Extension Application
Site Plan
11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 •(509) 921-1000 - Fax (509) 921-1008
,
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: March 9, 2004
TO: Heather Kauer, Assistant Planner, City of Spokane Valley Community
Development Department
FROM: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHD
SUBJECT: PE-1206-78 SummerField East 6th Addition
The Health District has no objection to the proposed extension of time for the above
referenced plat.
- Page 1 of 1
Heather Kauer
From: Sandra Raskell
Sent: Fnday, February 27, 2004 2-17 PM
To: Heather Kauer
Cc: John Hohman
Subject: PE-1206-78 Summerfield 6th Edition Time Extension
Heather,
The Public Works Department has no changes to the Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Decision dated January
17, 2003 With those conditions we approve the time extension
Let me know if you have any other questions
Thanks,
Sandra Raskell, P.E.
Assistant Development Engineer
City of Spokane Valley
11707 East Sprague Avenue
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Phone- (509) 688-0174
Fax. (509) 688-0037
2/27/2004
To: Heather Kauer (City of Spokane Valley)
CC:
From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date: Monday, March 08, 2004
Subject: PE-1206-78 Stage: Extension of Time Phase: SV
SUMMERFIELD EAST
FA14 The Division of Utilities has no new comments for the above project All previous
conditions apply
r
DEC 13 2003 16:08 FR TO 4582?17 P.02/04
w
- ►
CITY oF SpOKAvE VALLEY
APPLICATiON FoR EXTENSiON U~ TIME
bY'VYSION OF PLANIVING
NA.ME OF PLAT/FILE N4: Summerf ield East ; PE - 1206-78
PARCELNU:46353.9074; 46354.9050; 46352.9052; 46352.9066; 46351.9049
APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL QWNER): KJT Investments LLC
NYA1,ING A.DDYZESS: 122 N. Raymond, STE 3
CYT'y; Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99206
PHONE: (work) (home) (fax) 922-0195
TF APPYACANT iS NOT THE OWNER, INCLUDE VYMTTTN UW1VER AUTHbRiZATIOAI FOR
THE BELUW 4WNER,'S AESIGNATED CONTACT Tb SERVE AS REPRESEIVTATIVE
OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: Ken Tupper
MAII.,ING ADDRESS: 122 N. Raymond, STE . 3
C1TY: Spokane STA1'E:WA ZIP: 99206
PHONE: (work) (home) (fax)
1. Ras any porfivn of the plat, $hart plat or BSP been finalized (recorded)?
See attached
2. Has aproposed fmal plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Planning?
Xes X No if no, why has the Plat, short plat or BSP not been fuxalized?
What hAS been the deiay?
See attached
3.What progress has 4ccurred: Wbat conditions of approval have been completed (sach as survey
work, 3mprovemeats constructed, departmental approvals obtafned)?
See attached
SppKANE VAILEY
DEPARTMENT OF ,
0,0MM1JNITY OEVELOPMENT
DEC 13 2003 16:08 FR TO 4582717 P.03/04
a ~
4. Is this a phased project? Yes X No Xf yes, please camplcte the following infoxmation:
No. of lots originaily approved: 268 No. of phases finalized to date: 5
No. of lots remaini.ng to be finalized:109 No. of acres remWning to date: 40
LEGAL OVVNER SYGNATURE
_ (Signature of legal awner or representaEYve ae authorized by legal owner)
j,Kennith Tupper ,(print name) SVIEAP, OYt AFFIRM THAT
THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE MADE TRUTHFUI~LY AATD TO TM BEST OF M'Y KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THL OWNER UF RECORD QF THE AREA pROPOSED
FOR THE ASOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER, ATTACHEA
HEREWFTH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY ACTIONS UN
HIS/HER BEAALF.
ADDRESS:KJT Investments 122 N. Raymond STE, 3 pgONE:
CITY: Spokane STATE: WA Zu,,~ 99206
SIGNATURt DATE
,
NOTA.RY
STATE OF WASHNGTQN )ss:
CX'TY OF SPpICANE VALLEY)
.
svBSCxIBED Axn swoxiv to bcforc me chis G day of ✓,2o ()3
NOTARY SBAL
~
111y.412'rSGNATURE
..Fto
Notary Pubiic in and for the State of Washington
` ~P• , .
Res~a.mg at: u, s~l I
v
.
i ~ ~ ~
~ . ♦
:••'~J`~♦ MY aFPointcncnt ccxpires: ~
~
DATE SUBMII'TED_ RECEIVFD BY:
/
ANSdUNT RECENED. RECEg'T' NO:
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
SUMMERFIELD EAST; PE 1206-78
ATTACHMENT
The preliminary plat of Summerfield East was approved for development of
approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family dweliings. The developer has continually
developed the property since it was granted preliminary plat approval. In 1984, "Summerfield
East," consisting of 28 lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor. Also in 1984,
"Summerfield East First Addition," consisting of 53 lots was recorded with the Spokane County
Auditor. In 1985, "Summerfield East Second Addition," consisting of 19 lots was finalized and
recorded. In 1987, "Summerfield East Third Addition," consisting of 34 lots was recorded.
"Summerfield East Fourth Addition," consisting of 25 lots was recorded with the Spokane
County Auditor in October, 2002. In total, 159 of the 268 lots have been finalized.
The next phase, "SummerField East Fifth Addition," consisting of 19 lots has been
reviewed and approved the City and is ready for recording with the Spokane County Auditor.
All field work has been completed, inspected and bonded for. The developer is also presently
completing "Summerfield East Sixth Addition," which consists of 22 lots. All engineering work
has been completed for the Sixth Addition, plans have been signed by Spokane County and the
City of Spokane Valley, and the phase is expected to be finalized and recorded during 2004,
however, the applicant may elect to finalize the Sixth Addition at a later date based on market
demand. In that case, the applicant may need to seek an additional time extension.
The remaining unplatted property remains consistent with the City's Comprehensive
Plan, which designates the property as Low Density Residential. The property is still zoned
Urban Residential-3.5.
.
The plat sponsor respectfully requests a time extension in order to finalize the remaining
acreage of Summerfield East.
G\TTuppcr Kcn 856061Summerfield 21Anachmcnt to Ertension of Time 2003 wpd
1
.
To: Tammy Jones (Division of Planning)
CC:
From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date: Thursday, January 16, 2003
Subject: PE-1206-78 Stage: Extension of Time Phase:
SUMMERFIELD EAST
FA14 The Division of Utilities has no new comments for the above project. All previous conditions
apply.
1
Page 1 Engineers
OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER
1026 W Broadway Ave, Spokane, WA 99260-0170 (509)477-3600 Fax (509)477-2243
ffik '
&"Wei"ENGINEER'S CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL" EXTENSION OF TIME
TO: Spokane County Division of Planning
FROM: Division of Engineering & Roads
DATE: January 15, 2003
PROJECT: SUMMERFIELD EAST
FILE PE-1206-78 RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY
Review Date: 01 /13/2003 JAN 15 2003
Planner: TAMMY JONES pI\./ISION OF PIANNING
SponsorlApplicant: KENNETH TUPPER
Section Township Range: 35-26-77
Hearing Date: ( )
Technical Review Date: ( @ )
The Spokane County Engineering Department has reviewed the above referenced application. The
following "Conditions of Approval" are submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
inclusion in the "Findings of Fact, Conclusions and Order/Decision" should the request be approved.
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of
right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record.
2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Spokane County
Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the GUFF9Rt ''eR 1998 of the Spokane County
Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable standards. The plans and
report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or
building permit or approval of the final plat.
3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the
direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with
"As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and
grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have
been replaced.
4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way
unti) a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and
approval by the County Engineer. -
CC: Applicant KENNETH TUPPER
Engineer/Surveyor
Planner TAMMY JONES
.
Page 2
1206
5. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way is to be completed prior to
filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost
of construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting
the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer.
6. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County
standards and established as county roads.
7. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one-half (1 /2) rights-of-way and stub road
connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant.
8. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1-0298, as amended, which establishes regulations
for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
9. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to
Wellington Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road.
10. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right-of-way along Progress Road is required.
11. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road.
Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used.
12. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
13. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway routes
as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along
Wellesley Avenue.
14. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103
and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
15. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should fdooding,
caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to the road.
16. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the
Spokane County Engineers.
17. There shall be no further finalization of phases, all or a portion of which is within the Zone-
A Floodplain, until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm water runoff
from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports. Storm water
management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases.
18. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall
be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance.
Page 3
1206
19. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206-78,
Sumerfield East are hereby amended as follows:
a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest
adjacent grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence
and concrete garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation.
b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to
include grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development
activities).
c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting
homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain.
d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A
Floodplain without a CLOMR.
20. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the
impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of
additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified.
21. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation
regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding
responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary
work."
22. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be
prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the
duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management practices
(BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC plan is to
include, at a minimum, a grading plan, location and details of silt control structures, and street
cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be filtered prior to discharging into a
detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway. The TESC plan is to be
included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer is to submit the TESC plan
and supporting calculations to Spokane County prior to site disturbance. The TESC major
structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed prior to other site work and the
TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained throughout the duration of
construction, including house construction.
23. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right-of-way will neither be
maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the County
Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County Engineer, for the
perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This mechanism shall also
provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components
of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the respective components, and any
other improvements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and
Maintenance Manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the
Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents submitted to the County Engineer
Page 4
1206
for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life of the various components, a
calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a calculated replacement cost.
Homeowners Associations are accepted by the Spokane County Engineer for carrying out the
required maintenance functions and responsibilities.
24. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following described property be held in trust until
the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one (1)-foot strip at the ends or
edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul-de-sacs are
required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries of the final plat.)
25. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for
driveway approaches to the county road system.
26. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County
standards.
27. The County Engineer has determined that this project permit is exempt under the
Phase I Development Regulations - Section IV (B) (2b). Future time extensions will
require review by the Spokane County Division of Engineering for concurrency with the
Spokane County Comprehensive Plan.
END
~ y qEQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS
Requester's NW,e ( le se Print)
2.
R uester's Organi-zi ion - if applicable t
~
3. ~1'21L ~jt Requester's Mailing Address (Please Include Zip Code)
4. U'~~
Date of Reyuest Time of Day equester's Phone Number
5. Nature of Request:
y .
6. Document(s) Reference Identification &om Public Records Index:
7. Description of Document(s) Requested if Not Identifiable by Reference to Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County Public Records Index:
8. If the requested documents are%r include a list of individuals or companies, state the purpose for which the list is intended
and sign the following acknowledgment: I promise that the list of individuals or firms furnished hereunder will not be used
for commercial purposes.
Pwpose: '
PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE AGENCY ARE PROVIDED FOR INSPECTION AND COPYING SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING REGULATIDNS: .
(1) No person shall knowingly alter, deface, or destroy public records of the agency.
(2). Original copies of public records to the agency shall not be removed from the offices of the agency.
(3) Care and safekeeping of public records of the agency, furnished pursuant to a request for inspection or copying, shall be the
sole responsibility of the requester.
(4) Records furnished for public inspection or copying shall be returned in good condition and in the same file sequence or
organization as when furnished
(5) Boisterous or otherwise disruptive conduct by those requesting public records of the agency shall not be pennitted.
(6) The charge for providing copies of public records is fifteen cents ($0.15) per 8'/z by 11 or 8'/a by 14 inch page.
~M ,
Reqdester's Signalre ~ I *******s************~***********
OFFICE USE ONLY
Records provided by: Records returned in good condition:
Yes/No '(initials)
Comments:
No. of Copies Made: Amount Received: Receipt No.: Received by:
FACURRFM PLANNING MASTBR RORMS1Miu MuunVIEQUEST FOR PUBUC RECORDS "l).doe
~ -
!VI G M 0 R A N D U M
DATE: January 9, 2002
TO: John Pederson, Division ofPlanning
FROIVI: Brenda Sims & Lucy Pctcrschmidr; Stormwater IItility
RE: PE-1206-78 - Summerfield East-Extension of Tinie
CC: Kenneth Tupper, Taiumie Williwns; 7ohn Hollman, file
Vl/e have reviewed this request for an extension of time for the subject preliminary piat. We
would like to note that the second sentence of thQ third paragraph of fihe attachment included
with the appfication is incorrect. The County is not in the process of completing a"Stormwater
study" of the ForFcer Draw at this time. The County is, however, working on a Flood Zone study
of this area. We simply wanted to clarify this since a Stormwater study tjrpically involves
planning for future development, while a Fiood Zone study usuaily analyzes existing conditions
within the watershed.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
C:kWWDOVYSiTemporary Intomai Fl1aEA0Uq41Pt 1?06--78a.doe
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: January 10, 2002
TO: John Pederson, Senior Planner, Spokane County Division of Planning
FROM: Donald Copley - EHSII, SRHD
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE-1206-78 Summerfield East
The Spokane Regional Health District does not object to this extension of time for the
above referenced plat.
v _4
♦ E ~ I
r7,`
'
S P O YC AT-T E O U N T Y
DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS A DMSION OF TI-iE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
~ECEIV ELJ
SpOKANE COUNTf
MAR 2 7,501
M e m o ra n d u m pIvISIoN oF PLANNiNG
. RECEIVED
DATE: alVlarch 15, 2001 SpOKANIE COUNT'Y
~rn
TO: John Pederson, Spokane County Division of Plammmg b~~ ~
FROM: Tamrrue Williams Jo DIVISION OF PlANNfNG
RE: Summerfield East 4~' and 50' Addition, PE-1206
Jolui,
This letter is a follow up and supplement to the letter I scnt dated 1/12/99 and the revised
conditions witllin the extension of time for PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 dated 1/21/99 These
modifications are not substantive in nature and are consistent wrth the purpose and intent expressed
'wit.hin the extension of time findings, conditions of approval for the Spokane County Division of
Engineering and Roads item #6 Based on the above, we view the changes as administrative
modsfications of the conditions of approval
I have received itiforniation shoNNqng this plat to be compliant with certam conditions we put upon
the development in regard to floodplain concerns These are outlined in the atta.ched document, and
I will address them hErein
6 a Within the development all lowest floors, mcluding basement floors shall be at or above
elevation 2036; as this floodplam has been delineated as an alluvial fan, the structures shall be
constructed to withstand ariy expected debns flow
The first part of this condition is inaccurate Meetmg this condrtion would be a detrunent
to the floodplaul due to the import of fill in the areas below elevation 2035 Better
information subnutted to us from the proponent's enguleer shows that individual srte plans
with lowest adjacent grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for
residence and concrete garage slab at least 18 inches above curb elevation meets the
requirement to keep the structures safe from floodulg (flooding depths were shown to be
less than 1 foot in this area)
1026 W. Broadway Ave 9 Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 477-3600 FAX (509) 477-7655 (2nd Floor) 477-7478 (3rd Floor) • TDD (509) 477-7133
-
Page2, Pederson - 3/15/01
The second part of ttus concern (debns flow) was satisfactonly addressed by the
proponent's engineer
6 b and c Development within the Zone B only.
It has been shown that all lots are outside of the Zone A floodplain, each lot will still
rcqutre a floodplam development permit because they are within a Zone B
6 d No scaling offtie flood map.
A deta.iled topographic survey was completed to dipict the floodplain boundanes
6 e. Plat shall contai.n language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting homeowmers of
the requ►rements for developing withm the floodplain
This condrtion still applies.
6 f Roads must not bc constructed within the Zone A without further information being supplied
to the engineers' o££'ice to show safe ingress and egress during a 100 year event, and no linpact to
the floodplatn due to road development
This condltion has been met, all roads except a very small portion of one are Nvithin the
Zone B. safe ingress and egress has been shown without having to pass through the Zone
A floodplaul
6 g No further plat encroachment or finalization of pha.ses may occur within the Zone A
Floodplain «>>thout a CLOMR
None of the lots arc within thc Zone A, this condition has been met for this phase
I hope this is helpful, ►f you have questtons, please let me know
~ v ~ - 'r,`•~ ' ~ ~ _
3"o
.Y . ' J
BEFORE SPO~:.A.NE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
~ .
TN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION )
OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE-1206-78/ ) FINDINGS OF FACT
ZE-202-78; SUMMERFIELD EAST, ) CONCL.USIONS AND
AN APPROVED PRELIiYIINARY PLAT ) DECISION
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Keri.neth Tupper has been received and
decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance Section 12.100.118 and RCW
58.17.140.
~'rlitiDi 1GS OF rA.%"-'T AivD Cvivi J-juSi0i-1S
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering
this decision by the Spokane County Division of Building & Planning Director.
2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 2681ots for single
family dwellings and a zone reclassif cation from Agriculture (A) to Single Fanlily
Residential (R-1). .
3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on
January 30, 1979.
4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and
west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44EWM, Spokane
County, Washington.
5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) previously established as Agriculture (A) zoning in 1961 and redesignated to
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal
does conform to the requirements of the existing UR-3.5 zone.
o. i ne Lomprehensive rlan uzsignaLes this ~~a of the pr%-IlirLnary p:ai as TJ:ban, ar.3 t?:y
location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation
remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Portions of the
preliminary plat adjacent to Forker Road are affected by the Spokane County Arterial
Road Plan. Implementation of the arterial road plan will require reservation of a Future
Acquisition Area and special setbacks adjacent to Forker Road.
7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for
the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section
12.100.118 of the Spakane County Subdivision Ordinance (effective 1l1/97).
Section 12.100.118 states, "The Director may administrative approve an extension of
time provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render the filing
of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or creneral welfare, and
, .
i
r' •
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 Page 2
further provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply." The
following are the relevant sections of Section 12.100.118 and the Division of Building &
Planning response.
1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the
project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development
consistent with the original approval;
RESPONSE: Four (4) phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized
for a total of 135 lots. 133 lots remain to be finalized. No phases have been
finaliZed subsequent to the previous extension of time.
2. That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains
generally consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved,
and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing the plat or binding
site pian, which shall iric:lude uriz, b u t is not Iimi.ed to, thL foliowiiib:
a. surveying the lots within the development,
b. an-anging for public services to the site,
c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary
subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan,
d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of
preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval;
RESPONSE: The preliminary plat is generally consistent with the original
preliminary plat, and the applicant has conducted engineering and geological
investigation to document desired amendments to current flood plain
boundaries/designations. Completion of engineering work to evaluate stormwater
runoff from the Forker Draw is a specific requirementlcondition imposed on the
preliminary plat (see Spokane County Division of Engineering Condition No. 18).
The applicant has atso prepared engineering reports for construction of a stormwater
management system. In addition, the applicant is preparing a final plat (for 55 lots)
for review by Spokane County. These plans must be accepted by Spokane County
a prior to finalization of any further phases.
- 3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was
conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This
provision shall not apply ta public utility extension which the project sponsor would .
normally furd. -
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
4. That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the
plat within the five (5) year time period.
RESPONSE: Administrative delays in resolution of the current flood plain
boundaries and designation have prevented finalization of the remaining portions of
the preIiminary plat.
8. Additional conditions have been recommended by reviewing agencies and departments,
including the Spokane County Division of Utilities, Spokane County Division of
Stormwater Utility and the Spokane County Division of Engineering.
~ .
,
.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 Page 3
9. This is ihe ninth request for a time extension. The total ]ife of the preliminary plat has
been approximately 20 years.
10. The following facts are also relevant. .
a. This extension of time is ihe first extension request to be processed under the
Spokane County Subdivision ordinance adopted on December 17, 1996 and
effective on January 1, 1997. Section 12.100.118 of said ordinance states that "the
Director may grant one three (3) year time extension that may include any
additional or altered conditions and requirements recommended by affected
agencies. Additional one (1) year time extensions may be granted by the Director
beyond the initial three (3) year extension. Based on the above, the applicant is
advised that future time extensions may only be granted upon demonstration of
compliance with the extension criteria identified by Section 12.100.118 and for one
(1) year increments.
11. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with
Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an
additional extension of time.
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time -request for
• application PE-1206-78/ZE-2-278 is hereby A.PP~.20VED until February 1, 2002 and subject to
those conditions specified by Findings of Fact, Conclusions & Decision dated January 11, 1996
together with the following updated conditions.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKA.NE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLAnfNING (UPDATED)
1. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial
compliance with Section 12.104.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance.
2. The preliminary plat is given a time extension for three (3) years, specifically to February
22 2002. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written req•sest
approximately thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS (UPDATED)
Prior To Issuance Of A Building Permit Or Use Of The Properiv As Proposed:
1. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Vijashington, shall submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to all current standards
and laws governing stormwater management in Spokane County. Final drainage plans
and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineees acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit, or approval of the land action.
• r
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 Page 4
2. The stormwater management systems and roads for this plat shall be constructed and
certified to be constructed in accordance with the accepted road and drainage plans, or all
the required improvements must be bonded for in accordance with Spokane County
regulations, prior to the recording of the final plat. Record drawings and all construction
documentation shall be submitted with the proper certification statement.
3. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project
shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance.
4. If the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access and/or
drainage treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to
the submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access
strips on public roads will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified
and accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. No access through a non certified and
non--accepted phase of the deveiopment may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by
Spokane County for construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the
Sponsor's Engineer.
5. Adequate drainage easements, granted to Spokane County and/or an acceptable
rnaintenance entity, must be provided for all elements of the drainage plan, in order that
proper maintenance may be performed. Easements for drainage ditches and natural
drainage channels shall be wide enough to contain within the easement the runoff from a
50 year, 24 hour storm event for the contributing basin, plus a 30°lo freeboard. The
' easement shail also include an adequate maintenance access for the drainage course.
" 6. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Findings of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206-
78, Summerfield East are hereby amended as follows:
Within the development all lowest floors, including basement floors shall be at or
above elevation 2036, as this floodplain has been delineated as an alluvial fan, the
structures shall be constructed to withstand any expected debris flow.
~ All lots created must have a suitable building area outside the limits of the Zone A
floodplain.
c. Development shall only occur within the Zone B without further floodplain analysis.
Development includes, but is not limited to buildings or other structures, grading,
excavating, filling, paving. Floodplain Development Permlts shall be obtained for all
development partially or wllolly wiihin the Zones A or B.
d. Scaling off the map is not acceptable, surveyed elevations shall be used to delineate
the floodplain boundary. The east flank of the floodplain must be defined by
engineering analysis if it is intended that development will occur in this are6-/
e. The plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting
homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain.
. Roads may not be constructed within the Zone A without further information being
supplied to the engineer's Off'ice to show safe ingress and egress during a 100 year
event, and no impact to the floodplain due to road development.
, . j
. • ~ ,
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 Page 5
g. No fwrther plat encroachment or finalization of pbases may occur within the Zone A
Floodplain without applying for, obtaining and completing the requirements for a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
SPOKANE COUINTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (UPDATED)
1. The current Guidelines for Stormwater Management need to be met.
DATED THI
S ~ ~ s DAY OF JANUARY, 1999.
~~►~1 W. PEDEI~ON ~
nior Planner
\
~
Pursuant to ESHB-1724 and Spokane Board of Counry Commissioners resolution 96-0293, this document is also
considered the NOTICE OF DECISION. Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this
decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled.
To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee payable to the Spokane
County Division of Building & Planning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed.
. If you have any questions, please call the Division of Buildin; & P(anning at 477-3675. c: Division of Engineering
Division of Utilities
Regional Health District
Kenneth Tupper, Sponsor
Inland Pacific Engineering Co., Surveyor
Y
• 1
FRAME WALL
ROAD
WINDOW OR
FRAME WALL
CONCRETE SLAB
~ FOR GARAGE
,i
FINISH ROAD MIN. ELEV. OF CONCRETE WALL `
GRADE AT OR ~ NEAR EXISTING Z
GRADE
' TOP CURB 0 N, N
~
LIVING AREA
LOWEST ELEV.
CONCRETE WALL
UNBROKEN
\ r\ r, ~ ,
' G '
`
SCALE; NOT TO SCALE
~ ~ I NLAND
PACIFIC SUMMERFIELD EAST 4TH AND 5TH ADDITION
ENQINEERING HOUSING CONSTRUCTION IN FEMA ZONE 6 AREA
707 West 7th -Sulte 200 (509) 458-6840 DATE; 6\30\99
IPEC-99004-EXH3.DWG
\ Spakane, WA 99204 FAX: (509) 458-6844/ \ 0/
- _ r.G~C
r
S P O1-c- A N L ' G O U N T'Y
" NECEIVEU
D1YISION OF BNGINSBRING AND ROADS • A DNISION OF THE PUELIQ~~~~~;,~I'IeM~~
Willtiam A. johns. P.E.. County Enginee: Derrus ~ii~~
JAN 2 0 lyyy
Niemorandum
DIVISIQM OF HUILOING AND PLANIYINQ
DA'rE: January 12, 1999 8Y'
TO: John Pederson, Spokane Couaty Division of Buildmg and Plannis~
FRaM: Tammie WailiaTns, Flood.pla.in Administra.tor
RE: Summerfield East (98406) Amendmeat
-
Dean Franz, P.E. with Inland Pacific Engi=nng has submitted information to address floodplain
concems within the aUove mentioued Plat No. P-1206. CoQdition 18 oa the Hearing Examiner's
findings of fact (dated 1J1Ii96) has been addn3ssed to some e7d=t. Mr. Franz analyZed the area
wiLhin the Zone B fIoodpIain an has estabiished a base flood elevation of 2035 NGVD29. 'I"his
would allow development within the established Zone B with ocrtain canditions Usted below
Condition 18 ia Spokane County's Finduigs of Fact and Conclusions fvr PE-1206-78,
Summerf eld East are heseby amended as fvllows: .
• Within the development all lowest floors, iactuding basement floors shall be at or above
elevation 2036, as this flvodpl.ain has been dehn+eated as aa alluvial fan, the structures sball be
constructed to withstand any expected debris flow
• All Iots created must have a suitable biuldiag area outside the limits of the Zone A IIoodplain.
• Development shall only occur wiRhia the Zone B without fuTther floodPlain aaalysis.
Development includes, but is not linuted to buildings or other strucAues, grading, excavatiag,
filliag, parring. Floodplain Deveiopmeat Pernuts sball be obtained for all development parvally .
or wholly within the Zoaes A or B.
a Scaling offthe map is aot acceptable, surveyed elevatians sball be used to delitseate the
floodplain bouadary. The east flank of the floodpiain must be defined by eagiaesrug anaiysis
if it is intended that devolopment will occur ia tius area
•'I'he plat sball Gontain langua.ge identifyiag the area as a flood hazard area, aiemag
homeowaers of the requiremm+ents for deveiopmg vvithi.n the floodplain.
• Roads may tLVt be constiucted witbin the Zone A withflut further iafornaation being supplied to
the Engincer's Offi,ee to show safe ingress and cgress during a 100 year eveat, and no impact
to the floodplain due to road development.
• No fiuther plat encroa,chment or finalizatioa of pbases may occur vathin the Zone A
Floodplaia withaut applying for, obtaining aad compledng the requirements fnr a Conditional
Letier of Iviap Revisiav (CLOMR) fmm the ]Federal Emergency Mannemw Ageney.
1026 W. Broactway Ave • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-360'0 FAX: (50~ 324~78 TDD: (509) 324~166
~
. • _ ~ = ;
.t:
rJ p O N E C O U N T Y,
DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
William A. Johns, P E., County Engineer Dennis M. Scott, P E., Director
July 6, 1999
Dean Franz
IPEC
707 VV 7`~, Suite 200 Spokane, WA 99204
RE: Summerfield East 40' and 5' Addition, PE-1206
Dear Dean,
I am in receipt of your letter dated 7/1/99 outlining the conditions for building within the Zone B
floodplain in the above noted development. The conditions outline what we agreed upon in the
field on 6/29/99, and cIarify what has been discussed through previous correspondence. I believe •
' the floodplain concerns will be adequately addressed if these conditions are adhered to.
If you have questions, please let me know.
Sincerely,
Tammie Williams
Floodplain Administrator .
cc: Ken Tupper, file _
1026 W. Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 •(509) 456-3600 FAX: (509) 324-3478 TDD: (509) 324-3166
► , r _ 1 .
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
July 1, 1999
IPE Project: 99004 • .
Tammie Williams
Floodplain Administrator
Spokane County Public Works
1026 W. Broadway Ave, 2"d Floor
Spokane, WA 99260-1070
RE: Summerfield East 4t° & 5'h Addition
(Spokane County No. PE-1206) Dear Tammie:
Thank you for meeting with us at the project site a few days ago. Given the unusual conditions of
having an `Alluvial Floodplain' impacting the area, t1vs naturaIly creates the need for close
communication with County engineering staff as this development embarks upon final design. We
have listed below our understanding of what was agreeci upon during the field meeting.
The living spaces for single-family housing within the FEMA Zone B flood zone is subject
to certain elevation restrictions, as follows: 1) the top of concrete foundation/wall shall be
no less than 24 inches above the top of curb of the frontage road; 2) no openings (e.g. doors
~ and windows) will be allowed below the "min. elevation of concrete wall"; 3) the garage
slab shall be no less than 18 inches above the top of curb of the frontage road; and 4) ihe
living area can extend 42 inches below the described top of concrete wall. An exhibit
showing these dimensions is enclosed for clarification, and is labeled "Housing Construction
in FEMA Zone B Area."
~ The finish grade of the proposed streets within this plat, (e.g. the remaining phases within
the FEMA Zone B area), is to be at or close to existing grade. The intent of thas criteria is
to not have any of the internal streets significantly below existing grade.
• A one foot deep interceptor berm and two Type B drywells will be constructed along the
north side of the Zone B area with the next phase of Summerfield East. While no flooding
of the area from the `Forker Draw' is expected or has ever been observed, (due to the
presence of highly permeable `valley gravels'), an interceptor berm will be constructed to
provide an additional factor of safety against flooding. Maintenance access shall be provided
to this interceptor berfn, the berm will be placed within an easement, and maintenance
responsibilities of said berm and drywells will be assumed by the developer.
} L
1
,t
,
0
• 1 (
• ' • ~ S ~
Letter to Tammie Williams (7-1-99) .
Sumtnerfield East (PE-1206)
page 2
If any of these items of understanding are different that what you understood, please call me and we
can promptly make the necessary adjustments.
Sincerely,
Inland Pacifc Engineering
. ~
.
Dean Franz, P.E.
Engineering Manager
encl: Exlu-bit -`Housuag Construction in FEMA Zone B Area' (8 %Z" x 1 l
cc: Ken Tupper .
Project file '
_ 99004.Ltr of Understanding.7-1-99_wpd
0
r
, S P O K A I-4 E O UT-4- T Y
HECE{VED
DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AI`TD ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBI.IG~~R~~~
William A. Johns, P.E., County Engineer Dennis
,1aN 2 0 1999
Memorandum
QIVISION OF 6UILDING AND PLANNINQ
DATE: January 12, 1999 g~'
TO: John Pederson, Spokanc County Division of BuilcLng and Planning
FROM: Tammie Williams, Floodplain Admirustrator
RE: Summerfield East (98406) Amendment
Dean Franz, P E vAth Inland Pacific Engineenrig has submitted information to address floodplain
concerns within the above mentioned Plat No P-1206 Condition 18 on the Hearulg Exammer's
findings of fact (dated 1/11/96) has been addressed to some ettent Mr Franz analyzed the area
«nthul the Zone B floodplain an has established a base flood elevation of 2035 NGVD29 This
would allow developmcnt wtthm the established Zone B with certa.in condrtions listed below
Condition 18 in Spokane County's Findings of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206-78,
Swmnerfield East are hereby amended as follows:
• Within the development all lowest floors, mcluding basement floors shall be at or above
elevation 2036, as tlus floodplain has been delineated as an alluvial fan, the structures shall be
constructed to withstand any expected debris flow
• All lots created must have a suitable buildulg area outside the limrts of the Zone A floodplain
• Development shall only occur within the Zone B vvithout further floodplaui analysis
Development includes; but is not lmuted to buildings or otlier structures, gradhng, excavatmg,
filling, paving. Floodplain Development Permits shall be obtained for all devclopment partially
or wholly withm the Zones A or B
• Scaling offthe map is not acceptable, surveyed elevations shall be used to delineate the
floodplam boundary The east flank of the floodplain must be defined by engineeruig analysis
if it is wtended that development wnll occur tn this area
• The plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerttng
homeowners of the requirements for developmg witlun the floodplain
• Roads may not be constructed withm the Zone A without further mformation being supphed to
the Engtneer's Office to show safe ingress and egress during a 100 year event, and no Lmpact
to the floodplain due to road development
• No furtber plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A
Floodplam "nthout applyung for, obtaimng and completing the requLrements for a Conditional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency
1026 W Broadway Ave. • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 6 (509) 456-3600 FAX (509) 324-3478 TDD• (509) 324-3166
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING, INC.
SPOKANE • COEUR D'ALENE
Memorandum
Date: January,14, 1999
!3
To: Tammie Williams, Spokane County Engineers
Cc: John Pede.rson, Spokane County Planaing Dept.
'
From: Dean Franz, P.E.
-6~
Inland Pacific Engineering, inc.
Subject: Summerfield East - Change of Conditions to Eagineering Condition #18
Sent Via Fax
Thank you for sending me earlier today via facsimile the draft change of conditions for
Srimmerfreld Earst. The language is still not clear about undergound utility coastruction, and
when you read both the third and last bullet item as it pertains to allowed `development', it could
readily be interpreted that no utility constructioa work is allowed in the Zone A 8ood zone
without a CLOMR. As we discussed, this is not the intent.
I recommend adding a clause to the third bullet item.
"Undergrarind utility cotrstrrictiott work is permitted in the Zone A Floodplairi, .suhject to:
a) resioraliotr of the grorind stirface tn ihe pre-developed elevations upon completiorl of
construction; Q)2CI h) ObtRlnl)Ig Qpel'lfJJl fl'om Spokaire County fOl' SQ1d 1111I11y IUOrk "
Please call me. Thanks.
7( tti'eat '11, • sj,itU 1(:()
Cpokane, WA 99204
i09-458-6840 • FAX: 5(!9-458-6844
-
Pederson, John .
From: dfranz@ipe-sti.com[SMTP dfranz@ipe-sti com]
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 1999 9 18 AM
To: Pederson, John
Subject: Summefield East
John,
I talked to Tammie W yesturday afternoon. She informed me that the draft
language replacing Engr Condition #18 has been revised further. She has
eliminated the word "development" in the last bullet item, to address our
concerns mentioned in my previous memo. If this has been done, then as far
as I am concerned we can move forward on this updated plat conditions
Please inform me as to its status and proposed schedule. Thanks,
Dean
Page 1
Memorandum
DATE: January 11, 1999
TO: John Pederson, Spokane County Division of Building and Planning
FROM: Tammie Williams, Floodplain Administrator
RE: Summerfield East (98406) Amendment
Dean Franz, P.E. with Tnland Pacific Engineering has submitted information to address
floodplain concerns within the above mentioned Plat No. P-1206. Condition 18 on the Hearing
Examiner's findings of fact (dated 1/11/96) has been addressed to some extent. Mr. Franz
analyzed the area within the Zone B floodplain an has established a base flood elevation of 2035
NGVD29. This would allow development within the established Zone B with certain conditions
listed below.
Condition 18 in Spokane County's Findings of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206-78,
Summerfield East are hereby ammended as follows:
• Within the development all lowest floors, including basement floors shall be at or above
elevation 2036, as this floodplain has been delineated as an alluvial fan, the structures shall
be constructed to withstand any expected debris flow.
• All lots created must have a suitable building area outside the limits of the Zone A
floodplain.
• Development shall only occur within the Zone B. Development includes, but is not limited to
buildings or other structures, grading, excavating, filling, paving.
• Scaling off the map is not acceptable, surveyed elevations shall be used to delineate the
floodplain boundary. The east flank of the floodplain must be defined by engineering
analysis if it is intended that development will occur in this area.
• The plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting
homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain.
• Roads may not be constructed within the Zone A without further information being supplied
to the Engineer's Office to show safe ingress and egress during a 100 year event, and no
impact to the floodplain due to road development.
• No further encroachment, development or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone
A Floodplain without applying for, obtaining and completing the requirements (construction
of ponds, etc.) for a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
F"
S P O K. A1-7 .E fl , C O U T7 T X
DNISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS • A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
William A Johns, P.E, County Engineer Dennis M Scott, P E, Director
1Vlemorandum
DATE: Tanuary 11, 1999
TO: John Pederson, Spokane County Division of Building and Planning
FR01VI: Tammie Williams J .
RE: Summerfield East (98406)
Dean Franz, P E vvith Inland Pacific Engineenng has submitted mformation to address floodplam
concerns «qthin the above mentioned Plat No. P-1206 Condrtion 18 on the Hearmg Exan-uner's
findings of fact (dated 1/11/96) has been addressed to some extent Mr Franz analyzed the area
within the Zone B floodplam an has establishEd a base flood elevation of 2035 NGVD29 This
would allow development wrthin the esta.blished Zone B vAth certain condrtaons listed below
• Withm the development all lowest floors, including basement floors shall be at or above
elevation 2036, as tlus floodplam has been delineated as an alluvial fan, the structures shall be
constructed to withstand any expected debns flow
• All lots created must have a suita.ble building arEa outside the limits of the Zone A floodplain.
• Development shall only occur wlthin the Zone B Development includes, but is not lmuted to
buildings or other structures, gradmg, excavating, filling, pavulg
• Scalmg off the map is not acceptable; surveyed elevations shall be used to delineate the
floodplain boundary The east flank of the floodplain must be defined by engineen.ng analysis
if it is intendcd that development will occur w tius area
• The plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alErttng
homeowners of the requirements for developmg vAthul the floodplain
• Roads may not be constructed withm the Zone A without further information being supplied to
the Engmecr's Office to show safe ingress and egress during a 100 year event, and no impact
to the floodplam due to road development.
• No further encroachment or development may occur within the Zone A without applymg for,
obta.ining and completing the requirements (construction of ponds, etc ) for a Condrtional
Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency
With these conditions, development may occur as outlined above only withui the ZonE B portion of
the floodplain as shown on the Flood Insurance Ra.te Maps, and as analyzed by Dean Franz, P E.
for Inland Pacific Engineering
1026 W Broadway Ave • Spokane, WA 99260-0170 0 (509) 456-3600 FAX. (509) 324-3478 TDD (509) 324-3166
M E M O R A N D U M
DATE: December 28, 1998
TO: John Pederson, Division of B 1 g and Planning
` L
FROM: c B" enda uns and Katherul Miller, Stormwater Utilrty
RE: Time extension request for PE-1206-78; Summerfield East
CC:
While it is understandable that the drainage in this area has been difficult to engineer a
solution, it is somewhat perplexing why this plat has been extended for twenty years
We recommend a six month time extension provided that the following condition be placed on
this plat:
1) The current Guidelines for Stormwater Management need to be met
\lneptunelstormlStormIKATHRINEIDESIGN1pe120678 doc
To: JOHN PEDERSON (Building & Planning)
CC: KEVIN COOKE (Utilities)
From: JIM RED (Utilities)
Date: 12122/98
Subject: PE-1206-78 Stage: Extension of Time Phase:
SUMMERFIELD EAST
A001 Comment:
The proJect was originally conditioned for Dry Sewer and Double Plumbing. However, the project lies
outside of the 15 Year Sewer Capital Improvement Plan and inside of the IUGA The development
regulations for the IUGA state that developments outside of the 15 Year Sewer CIP and inside of the
IUGA must make a live connection to the general sewer system If the IUGA regulations apply to the
above development, then the project must connect. Otherwise, the project is conditioned for dryline
and double plumbing
~
Spokane County Public Works Department ~Division of Lon Ran e Plannin ~
g g g
~
interoffice memo
Date: 12/17/98
To: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner
CC: John Mercer, AICP
From: Allan N. deLaubenfels, Planner
RE: PE 1206-78 extension of preliminary approval
Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the above proposal. The Division of Long
Range Planning finds the following:
The proposal is inside the Interim Urban Growth Area and in the Urban Plan category.
The Long Range Division has no comment on the proposal.
RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTY
0 E C 17 1998
ViVISION OF BUILDING AND PL,4NNINC;
8Y:
d
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: December 15, 1998
TO: John W. Pederson, Senior Planner, Spokane County Building and
Planning Division
~
~
~
FROM. Donald T. Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SRHD ~
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE-1206-78 Summerfield East
The Spokane Regional Health District does not object to the extension of time
for the above mentioned plat.
planrnng Itr1 pe-1206-78\ pa
♦ f--
Pederson, John
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 10 02 AM
To: Pederson, John
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat, Kimball, Sandy, Busko, Doug; Miller, Katherine, Sims, Brenda;
Darrell, Virginia
Subject: P-1206 - Summerfield East - Time Extension Request
12-16-98
I received the above referenced application on Dec. 11, 1998
I recommend a time extension with the following updated conditions of approval:
• A Professional Engineer, licensed in tbe State of Washington, shall submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to all current standards and
laws governing stormwater management in Spokane County. Final drainage plans and a
drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit, or approval of the land action.
• The stormwater management systems and roads for this plat shall be constructed and certified
to be constructed in accordance with the accepted road aod drainage plans, or all the required
improvements must be bonded for in accordance with Spokane County regulations, prior to
the recording of the final plat. Record drawings and all construction documentation shall be
submitted with the proper certification statement.
• A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall
be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptaace.
• If the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access and/or drainage
treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to the submittal
of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access strips on public roads
will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified and accepted by Spokane
County for maintenance. No access through a non certified and non-accepted phase of the
development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for
construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer.
• Adequate drainage easements, granted to Spokane County and/or an acceptable maintenance
entity, must be provided for all elements of the drainage plan, in order that proper
maintenance may be performed. Easements for drainage ditches and natural drainage
channels shall be wide enough to contain within the easement the runoff from a 50 year, 24
hour storm event for the contributing basin, plus a 30% freeboard. The easement shall also
include an adequate maintenance access for the drainage course.
o',e q ' . 2)!;7
Page 1
Pederson, John
From: Hemmings, Bill
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 10.02 AM
To: Pederson, John
Cc: Engelhard, Scott; Harper, Pat; Kimball, Sandy; Busko, Doug, Miller, Katherine; Sims, Brenda;
Darrell, Virginia
Subject: P-1206 - Summerfield East - Time Extension Request
12-16-98
I received the above referenced application on Dec. 11, 1998
I recommend a time extension with the following updated conditions of approval:
• A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, sball submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to all current standards and
laws governing stormwater management in Spokane County. Final drainage plans and a
drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit, or approval of the land action.
• The stormwater management systems and roads for this plat shall be constructed and certified
to be constructed in accordance with the accepted road and drainage plans, or all the required
improvements must be bonded for in accordance with Spokane County regulations, prior to
the recording of the final plat. Record drawings and all construction documentation shall be
submitted with the proper certification statement.
• A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project shall
be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance.
• If the project is phased and one phase depeods on another phase for access and/or drainage
treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certif ed prior to the submittal
of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access strips on public roads
will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified and accepted by Spokane
County for maintenance. No access through a non certified aod non-accepted phase of the
development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by Spokane County for
construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the Sponsor's Engineer.
• Adequate drainage easements, granted to Spokane County and/or an acceptable maintenaoce
entity, must be provided for all elements of the drainage plan, in order that proPer
maintenance may be performed. Easements for drainage ditches and natural drainage
chaDnels shall be wide enough to contain within the easement the runoff from a 50 year, 24
hour storm event for the contributing basin, plus a 30% freeboard. The easement shall also
include an adequate maintenance access for the drainage course.
Fi&'W ' . ;V5
Page 1
. ' ,r. ~
v ~ a
u
S P O K A N E - C O U N T Y
UTILITIES DIVISION • A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
N Bruce Rawls, P.E., Utilities Director Dennis M. Scott, P.E., Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: John Pederson - Division of Building and Planning
FROM: Jim Red - Division of Utilities REC€IVED
SPOKANE COUPiTY 7
DATE: January 04, 1996 JAN 0 4 1996 RE: Extension of Time for Summerfield East OIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
PE-1206-78 SY.
John:
The County Utilities Division has no objection to the extension of time for PE-1206-78.
Thank you.
1026 W. Broadway o Spokane, WA 99260-0180 o (509) 456-3604 FAX (509) 456-4715 TDD (509) 324-3166
OFrICF OF TNE COUNTY ChlGINEER
SPOk: ANE COUNTY, WASH INGTON
December 1'-74 , 1'33 '315
TQa SPOk ANE COUNTY I'LANNIIVG DEPARTMERIT (Ci_trrent PLanninq
Aciministrat----r.)
FROM a '3F'Ok: ANE COUNTY ENG I iVEER
aUBJa EXTENSI0N OF TIME, PE t-206-78~Summer fa.e7c{ East
rL : Subd ivisir-ins
The C, -Ii_tnty Enqineer has rPViewed fi!-~~ e.,,.tensi----n of txme and I-tas nci
a(:j Cj 1t1-D(l a1 C-DfTl fTl Ea i"1 t 5 to add othe1'' a han t(°I oS tn con dit ic-In s c-f Y t? C-D1° d aS
a5 amended. When ~~tailed cJrainage ~.~nd r----ad plans ar~ submittpd they
s h ~~ll c mply with the G+_tidelines fl--ir- Storinwater ihanaqement and
~~~z-4ane C~~-unty Road Standards as amended.
-
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
5~oKANG CoUt0y ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
flEC 1 1S95 INTEROFFICE MEMO
1
\ o~ Bui~o~Na Pt.MN~to
~i~p~. DATE: December 7, 1995
TO. 'John Pederson, Senior Planner, Spokane County Buiiding and Planning
Division
FROM: Donald T. Lynch, EHS II - EHD, SCHD
421to `Extension of Time for PE-1206-78 Summerfield East
The Spokane County Health District does not object to the extension of time for the
plat. All Spokane County Health District Conditions remain.
planning Itrlsumrfild peNlmlw
,
. ~
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTN DIziiRICT
~ Inter-office Communication
✓ DATE: October 20, 1992
T0: Thomas Veljic, Planner I, Spokane County Planning Dept.
FROM: Steven P. Holderb~Y,'~R.S., - Environmentai Health Division, SCHD.
SUBJECT: Extension of Time Request for Summerfield East PE-1206-78
Listed below are the Health District's updated conditions of approval for the
Extension of Time request for the above-referenced piat:
l. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary
plat of record and/or any attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the
prelimjnary plat of record for distribution by the Pianning
Oepartment to the utiiity companies, Spokane County Engineer, and
the Spokane County Health Oistrict. Written approval of the
easements by the utiiity companies shall be received prior to the
submittai of the final plat.
3. Sewage disposai method shall be as authorized by the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of
Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when
appraved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of
Hea 1 th .
6. Prior to filing the final piat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Spokane County Heaith District that an adequate
and potable water suppiy is available to each lot of the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence
that the plat lies within the recorded service area of the water
system proposed to serve the plat.
8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic
irrigation use, and fire protection use shall be approved by the
water purveyor. Said water pian must have been approved by the fire
protection djstrict and the appropriate health authorities. The
health authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and the fire
protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final
piat, on the face of said water pian that the pian is in conformance
with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective
needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a
transparency suitable for reproduction. f
~;a~-v% P ~ E .
OCf 12 1992
5o - _ ..vuov 0 Y
PLANNINC3 OEPAATMENT
- _ _ , _ _ . - -
Memo to Thomas v,~,4,ljic
Page 2
9. The purveyor wi i 1 also certify prior to fi i ing the f inal piat on a
copy of said water pian that appropriate contractuai arrangements
have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water
system, in accordance with the approved plan and time scheduie. The
time schedule wi 1 i provide, in any case, for completion of the water
system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to
application for buiiding permits within the plat. The contractual
arrangements wiil include a provision holding Spokane County,
Spokane County Heaith District, and the purveyor harmless from
ciaims by any lot purchaser refused a building permit due to failure
of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the approved water
system.
10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shail demonstrate to the
satisfaction of the Spokane County Health District that suitable
sites for on-site sewage disposai systems are available on ali lots
within the approved preliminary plat not aiready finalized.
li . Subject to specific application approvai and issuance of permits by
the Health Officer, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal
systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to
specific appiication approval and issuance of permits by the Health
Officer, the use of individual on-site sewage disposai systems may
be authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the piat shall state: "Use of private
we11s and water systems is prohibited."
14. The piat dedication wiil contain a statement to the effect that:
"The public water system as approved by County and State health
authorities and the local fire protection district and purveyor will
be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for
individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each
lot prior to saie of each lot and prior to issuance of a building
permit for each iot."
c: Ken Tupper
Windermere/Tupper Realty
E. 12929 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA 99216
inland Pacific Engineering
S. 25 Altamont
Spokane, WA 99202
0792P/ps
i
'.Ir'--7L!r; E QF 7~-: E CCJ I1 N`i Y dd NGi NETER
Sf'(7P<. ANE C~'.~U&'.6 TY , WASH INGiC'1h;
EYy ED °A) 'G e f Yl b 2 ..a ':3 v S J .W
TO o~ S€' 0v=. AI'v E C OU~N9 c `T' PLANN9 i ( Yr D'r-_PARl" E!\? I' (Citr rrent i=' lanninq
P''9 C! ! !7 i ri i- s t r a to s i'' )
RU'e:.- S"10 'S ANIE COL iNTY ICN~.~ IN~ERei&v~.
S U Es OF "i ` c',IEP "o_Q inmer~ ~ le-? cl East
ar eU Subcjs t~ ~ -I-:.-s-a S
iX'e '°.cy ve rcV .n. ewazd i"i e abo'd c~ Y' efel" enC ed F,. te""1 Ga o :lrl ~ ~.-f T:L iYl e Y equesto T i p 2
Swe i a ig ~r^ fi E r f i Ea r i , c~ i`' e p r~ c s.-3 l~ y t~:' i~I t Y'~ 2 t'' e t~~ e_E e S i~'. ~
Tric-: Y oDi.6 ow3. nr, Condi`u 7L jwIi1 {a c-~" Appr-_ ° ve..~ l. aY' e. c-l be aC7 C eCj c: G "t". hx. s-,
`~Ifti E1 IN 0r'rl Cz.' Y bi` d. ng hE7 pY' posal 1 Cl ~ -`i coDfYl pt.d. anr W .3. . h -?t dopted
^'R
t... `_o ~_i t 1 ~ F f c°s n,--r .=,1'' ds c 3 f 1 ~ po iC yp
i 1 'D fui''' tt"I a1`' ot{" p!°! 4.~ seea until ngi€"t eeY' .,?'fi g
Cfd 5»~ P e~ C 551o w G? `t p- C`.~ t o F? v t- i~.---A `E. e t C.: ~s c - 1`' m w e.=1 t, Ea i'" 6' l I-1 c~
rn" ~~o ~ r, ~.a e 1" c.i w c't s'i tia Y E:.~ d 2. ~ t e C_'° i i'1 ''l e w r,:~ I e °l s ed E9"{ A ftl a o s -A Cl Q"~ i2 p Cs 5 -
w cl, C: ti' f I 16.~ 6`! agefYl eP"i 3: r:1 1 cii"1 °'i 9ha I I 17 e dp- V 6? b~~iped f~.'~ Y' il. co r tc~ '1 . na y 2. Zw'u -n
i o ~ o' p) hc-k s c- s.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
inter-office Communication
OATE: September 29, 1992
T0: Thomas Veljic, Piann r I, Spokane County
FROM: Steven P. Holderby, R.S. - Environmental Health Division, SCHD.
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Surtunerfield East, PE-1206-78
The Neaith District has no objection or additional conditions for this
extension of time request.
R ECEIVE D
OCT 1 02
bKI.... ,
PLJINNING OEPARTIrtEM'
0030s/28/gs
- - ~
, SROKANE VALLEY FIRE DERAR"TMENT
• 1~~~ - S~okane Coun#y Fire Pratection District No. 1
ERST 40319 SPRAGUE AVE • spoKANE, WA 99206 •(6o9) 928-1700 • FAx (509) 927-2227 ~
Rad fedrow
Chief
September 11, 1992
~EI)
Spokane County Planning
N. 721 Jeffersvn SEP 141992
Spokane f wa. 99260
SPO~~~~
Attr1: T~1Qfia s Ve I ] i c
~~~~~'f~~
Re: Extensian of tirne for Summearfield East PE-1206-78
We have no objections to an extension of tirne.
Sincerely,
~ ~
Paul Chase
Inspector I
PC/bd
R~
~ ~
r
' IkPOKANE CDUNTY HEALTH DISTRIC7'
Inter-vff i ce Cvrnmunicatian
aATE: Octaber 24, 1989
~R ~
T0: Thomas G. ~Rosher, A Senior Planner, Sp+okar~e Cvutr~ty
FROM: Steven P. Hol derby, R.5. #-Environrnental Hea1tF► Qi vision, SCNQ.
SUBJECT: Extension of Tirne for Summerfie1d East PE-1206-78
The Health District has na objection to the extension vf time request for the
abave-listed plat. The oniy comment is to reinst~te ali prev~ous1y impvsed
conditions vf approval.
0663PIps
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICI
Inter-office Communication ~
DATE: October 24, 1989
~
70: Thomas G. Mosher, A CP Senior Planner, Spokane County
FROM: Steven P. Holderby, R.S. - Environmental Health Division, SCHD.
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Surnnerfield East PE-1206-78
The Health District has no objection to the extension of time request for the
above-listed plat. The only comment is to reinstate all previously imposed
conditions of approval.
0663P/ps
R ECEIVE D
OCj 2 5 1989
SPOK/1NE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPAATMEiYT
I
i
SFOKAI'rT`E COCl'NTY PROSECUTING ATT[]RNEY
Doaald C. Brockett
I v ~
MAR 16 1988
~ ~',~~~-'~-~t~~*~ ,~t~
~P0~ld~E COU1ii_
~
. RAW~lN'' HPAPMLENT
. ,
.
. . - - . , _ . . _ _ _ . . _
~ ~ . . _ _ . r- _F ~ .
- . ,
~ v s i'~.~~~..~
_ . . .
. . , . . . . . . •
, .
,
. - ,
i .L n.- L -r ~ 1 'v 11 ~ : 1 i r C.. L 1 ~ ~ ti: 6
:---n Tttpper pursuant t4 the conditions imposed upon the Summerf zel-.
.,ist Subdivision. Today, I received, a c1ai~ from Stan for $6, 514. 0;:
-?ae basis of the claim is detai l-ed in the attached letter. '~ould yc
ease l~ave t~~ ~~~~opriate pea: ~n your staff provide me with -
;iC.4.uai r"'~~' .~potisL~ to' Stanp s allege"~tions and po5itZoZif C~s well aS cop1e
~ ~~~evant files. I would a1so be intezested in a recommendatic_
_,-om your dex~artment as ~ow I shc.., -
~ f
V
~
'57
5~
-f A-2x~
rav
r ~
_r
1
ot counsel
r ry ,-~~R; ♦ ~-;'~~-reti~.4 JOSeph J RekOfke
tAs :,..EY
Patnck H Wtnston
Leo N Cashatt (1977)
;AA R 15 1988 'C Matthew Andersen
L A W Y E R $ ►vians Bettms
Robert P 8eschel
"'John C Btack
SEAFIRST FINANCIAL CENTER ,lames P Connelly
l'
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201-0695 M(chaet J Cromn
•Hilary S Oews
(509) 838-6131 Pamele ,1 oeRusha
TEI.ECOPIER 838-1416 Leo J Dnscoll
(509) F J Oullenty. Jr
Robert A Ounn ,
Stephen L. Farnell
Ma rch 7, 1988 Jemes A Fish
"Richatd P Guy
1924 NORTHWEST BOULEVARD Tim M Hi9elns
Carl E Hueber
COEUR d'ALENE, IDAHO 83814 Joel C McCormick, uI
(208) 667-2103 'Stanley D Moore
Michael F Nienstedt
Fred C Pilenz
Mr. Robe r t B i nq e r ,Waho Q WBshinoon SW0 Bm Lynden O Resmussen
RicAat
D e u t Pr ose c u t in t t orn e "Hawam 3 WasMnpcon State 9ere ~d~ W Retyea
p y q y •„n~as~e, Iaano 6 Y~eshir,q~on Stete eers Stanle R Schultz
~l odvm yyashoVa, Stm gw p„iy PatnCk A Sullivan
C 1 V 1 1 D 1 V 1 S 1 O I1 Lewrence H vance, Jr
Spokane County Lucinde S wnaley
Robert H Wheley
We $ t 1115 B r o a dw ay Merrvrether D Williams
S p o k a n e, WA 9 9 2 O 1 Patricle C williems
Re: Fees In Lieu Of Dedication/Summerfield
East Subdivision
Dear Mr. Binger:
As we discussed, this letter will constitute the formal claim
of Tupper, Inc. for the return of fees paid to Spokane County
for the benefit of its Parks & Recreation Department. The
amount of such fees is $5,974.00. The amount of this claim is
$5,974.00 plus interest thereon in the amount of $1,440.00, for
a total of $6,514.00.
Backvround and Evidence in Suvvort of the Claim.
If it were necessary to litigate this matter in order to obtain
satisfaction of this claim, Tupper is prepared to present the
following evidence in support of its position.
The Summerfield East Subdivision was preliminarily approved on
January 30, 1979 by the Spokane County Hearing Ezaminer
Committee. Prior to the date of approval, there were several
discussions with the Spokane County Parks & Recreation Director
(hereinafter "Director") regarding possible dedication of land
to Spokane County within the 91-acre Summerfield East
Subdivision to be used for park purposes. The general idea was
that a small park would relieve pressure on other County parks
and also provide an amenity desirable to the developer and the
future residents of the Summerfield East Subdivision. A
f
• .t '
~ , .
Mr. Robert Binger
March 7, 1988
Page 2
difficulty arose, however, when it was realized that the
developer's fair share of this contribution would result in a
park of smaller size than the Parks Department prefers to
maintain. The Director indicated at that time that Spokane
County did not have funds to purchase more land to increase the
size of the park, nor did Spokane County have funds to develop
and maintain the park.
Further discussions with the Director indicated that a fee paid
in lieu of this dedication would be necessary in order for the
Parks Department to support and, perhaps more importantly, not
oppose the approval of the plat. The Parks Department
determined the amount of the fee. The developer had little
choice but to accept the Parks Department proposal, believing
representations of the Director that vocal opposition from the
Director at the Hearing Ezaminer Hearing would substantially
impair, if not guarantee, denial of the preliminary plat. The
preliminary plat of Summerfield East was approved, with a
requirement that $58.00 per lot be paid at the time the
building permit was issued on the lot.
In early 1984, Tupper, Inc. sought to obtain final plat
approval on the first phase of the Summerfield East plat.
Since that time, he has obtained final plat approval on two
additional phases of the plat. In the process of obtaining
final plat approval of the first phase in early 1984. The
Director indicated at that time that an agreement had been
entered into to develop and maintain for park purposes land
owned by East Valley School District immediately adjacent to
the Summerfield East Subdivision, and that funds derived from
building permits in the Summerfield East project would be used
only for this purpose and that developer be forwarded with a
copy of the agreement and some reasonable assurance that the
park would actually be developed. The Director failed to
forward any agreement with East Valley School District.
In late 1985, the Director indicated that the Department was
unable to come to agreement with the East Valley School
District, and that the Department would not be developing a
park immediately adjacent to Summerfield East Subdivision on
the school lands, and that he would see to it that the funds
which had been paid would be returned. Since that time, we
have been seeking return of these fees and others which have
been required to be paid as a condition of issuance of permits.
r ..r
~ t -
~
1 -
Mr. Robert Binger
March 7, 1988
Paqe 3
Leval Consideration$.
As you are aware, in 1982, the legislature passed -
RCW 82.02.020, which precludes the imposition of "any tag, fee,
or charge, either direct or indirect on the construction or
reconstruction of residential buildings, commercial buildings,
industrial buildings or any other buildinq or building space or
appurtenance thereto or on the development, subdivision,
classification, or reclassification of land."
Also in 1982, our Supreme Court, in the case of Hilli.s Homes v.
Snohomish County, 97 Wn.2d 804, 650 P.2d 193 (1982),
invalidated an informal procedure of Snohomish County whereby a
fee in lieu of dedication for school purposes was ezacted from
a developer. The Supreme Court held that Snohomish County had
no authority to impose or collect such a fee for the reason
that these fees were actually taxes which the County had no
authority to levy. A similar dedicatory requirement for parks
and recreation property was also found to be outside of the
authority of a municipality in Eyde Con*truction Co, v. Charter
Townshiv of Meridian, 386 N.W.2d 687.
It seems clear that the requirement of the $58.00 fee in lieu
of dedication for park purposes in the Summerfield East
Subdivision is presently, and has been unlawful during all of
the period within which fees were collected. It also seems
clear that in 1979, the County had no authority to impose this
type of condition on a preliminary plat and, similarly, it is
also clear that the developer had no choice but to agree to the
imposition of these fees at that time. It is difficult to
conceive of the acts of the developer as being "voluntary"
within the meaning of RCW 82.02.020, even if the County had
authority to impose these conditions.
It seems clear that the director, in 1984 prior to the time of
the f inal plat approval of the f i rst phase of Summerf ield East,
made a commitment that these funds would be egpended on school
lands immediately adjacent to the Summerfield East
Subdivision. The director has quite candidly indicated that
the Department was unable to enter into an agreement with the
School District, and that the developer should seek return of
these funds.
In conclusion, it is our position that the initial imposition
of these funds was as a result of an agreement that was coerced
and, in any event, resulted in a condition to the plat approval
which the County, regardless of the nature of the voluntariness
of the agreement, had no authority to impose as a plat
~ o o -f
r
,
~
~
Mr. Robert Binger
March 7, 1988
Page 4
condition. Secondly, even if the fee could lawfully be imposed
as a plat condition, it was, of course, by 1984, at the time of
final plat approval, subject to the provisions of -
RCW 82.02.020. The County made a commitment for use of these
funds, but now has indicated that it will not use the funds for
that purpose. In reliance upon the County's representation
that it would not use these funds, the developer has
anticipated the refund of these funds and committed them for
other purposes.
In short, under decisions of our Supreme Court, in the specific
language of the statute which egpressly preempts the County's
authority in this regard, the egaction of these fees has been
unlawful and a return of the fees so paid is justified. Please
advise of your decision in this regard within 20 days.
Very truly yours,
,
~
T NLEY . SCHULTZ
MFN:rc
CITY OF SPOKANE, WASH[N • ~ CITY PLAN COMMISSION
309 City Hall
RICHARD H BARRETT, President
SPOKANE VAUGHN P CALL, A I P
Manager - Planning
ALL-AMERIGCI7Y E T CLEGG, A I P
' III Planning Director
November 13, 1978
Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Attention : Fred Dayharsh, Spokane County
Planning Dixector
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
Subj ect : EIS Summerfield East
I have reviewed the above EIS and as always have a concern
with the effects of developmEnt over the Spokane Aquifer. This
development and more like it arE eventually going to have some
effect on this valuable water resource. Due to the extensi.ve
studies of the aquifer most recently being completed through the
"208" Program and the Department of Ecology and Environmental
Protection Agencies involvement, I would support recommendation
by these agencies on mitigating measures to protect this water
resource.
Sincer ly,
• ,
E. Terry C`leg ~
Planning Direc or
ETC : GOZ : vj d
CE
ED
E
Npv 2 01978
SPOKANE CDUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMEHT
,
_ 1
~
PROjECT NAME FILE NUMBER (S)
OFF'ICE OF RE-
SPONSIBILITY ~L~•T 71717oc
ADMINISTRATIVE tLEMENTS OF
AGREEMENT 717178 ENVIRONMENT 71j V/;p
ACCEPTANCE ` LEAD ENC7
LETTER 7126-178 NOTIFICATION 7// VI
DRAFT EIS ENI) OF REVIEW ISSU ED PERIOD
FINAL EIS 7-DAY
ISSUED PERIOD
REMARKS:
FOLDER INDEX
SECTION 1. REQUIRED FORMS
SECTION 2. MAPS & CHARTS
SECTION 3. PRE-DRAFT CORRESPONDENCE '
SECTION 4. DEIS/FEIS REVIEW NOTES
SECTION 5. DEIS COMMENTS
I -
~IS ADMINiSTRATIVE EXPENSE AGREF,NIENT ACCOUNTING FOR (~~M S
Inxtial DePosit of , made on 7&- Agreement signed bY Commissioners on
~ ~ .
/
STAFF STAFF EFFORTS AMOUNT CURRENT
DATE INIT. NAME POSITION HOURS TE*
/ RA DEDUCTIBLE DEPOSITS BALANCE COMMENTS
Cof' #0 1 P
- 1'
717178 , T
&
d " VPA ~
, t CN' A` 'Y
, .
s
,
7
htios 0.5 ipo r Ya-" f SA17
. ~
it d, D -
5~3y
.
~
~
. 0 a -
1 0 , 0
~R~R s
, pA
7 c Ri
~ UN
en QS
1 c. I )vI
in 31
.
l~
- ~ ~ -w
t 2~- ~ti~4
8
. . ~ ~
~ - ~ _ M~►~ ~,N6~,S
1 ~
r~ '-R.
,
~ -
~
d, vv
bn
P
~
? RATE INCLUDES BASIC HRI,Y AMT.> IND. INS.> SOC. SEC.p HFAI,TH/LIFE INS. AND RE!'IREMENT.
Reference..PE-
~
t
OUTLINE OF DRAFT E.I. S.
for
t
(including pertinent elements of the environment Appendix A)
I. Introductfon.
II. Table of Contentso
III. Dfstribution Lfst. '
- - - ~d
IV. Surrimary of the Contents of the Draft E.I. S.
. ._.m.m
.
V. Impact Summary.
A. ` Description of Proposal.~
_ - - , - - - _ ~
- _
B. Existf ng Envlronmental Condtttons.
~
(only in terms of the Elements of the Environment of Appendlx A)
C. The Impact of the ProQosal on the Environment .
(only in terms of the Elements of the Envi.ronment of Aipp,endix A)
.
a~ D. ~ The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Uses of Man's
Envfronment and Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term 0
Productivity.
~
E. F Irreversible or Irretrtevable Commitments of Resources..
;C
~ 4:F,:) .
F. ` Adverse Environmental Impacts Which May Be Mittgated.
. G. 'Alternatives to the Proposal.
~ H.° - Unavoidable Adverse Impact s.
I. Othe'r Issues.
~ (optional a s appropriate)
,
VI. Detailed Categorical Analysis.
(the following elements preceeded by "N/A" need not be addressed, in
accordance with WAC 190-10-444 (1)
A. Elements of the Physical Environment
1. Earth
2. Air
3. Water
4. Flora
s
. ~
~
5. Fauna '
6. Notse '
7. Lfght and Glare . '
8. Land Use ;
9. Natural Resources 10. Risk of explosion or hazardous emtssions
:
B. Elements of the Urban Environment - ,
1. Populatfon
2. Housing r
3. Transportation/circulation ;
4. Public services
5. Energy ~
6. Utilftfes . ;
7. Human health ~
8. Aesthetfcs
9. Recreation 10. Archeological/historical
11. Additional populatfon characteristics
12. Economic impact '
,
APPENDIX A As per WAC 197-10-44 (1) the Elements of the Envlronment are listed below
when preceeded by an "N/A" the item need not be addres $ed in the E.I.S .
. . . .
(1) ELEMENTS OF THE PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT • r '
(a) £ARTH. '
(1) Geolog y. `
(ii) Soils.
~
(ili) Topography. .
(iv) Unique phystcal features. .
(v) Erosion.
A (vI) Accretion/avulsion.
(b) AI R. .
(i) Air quality.
(ii) Odor.
~ (ili) Climate.
. ' . 'i
(c) iNATE R . ' -
P111Z4 (t) Surface Water moverne
_ t o
(li) Runoff/absorption.
,
(ili) Floods . . •
(fv) Surface water quantlty. (v) Surface water quallty. '
(vi) Ground water movement.
(vIi) Ground water quantityo ~
(viit) Ground water quality.
(ix) %'Rubllc water supplies'.,.
(d) FLORA o ' . ' .
(i) Numbers ordtversity of species. .
(ii) Unique species,
(iii) Barriers and/or corridors.
s ~
. (iv) Agrlcultural crops.
(e) FAUNA. -
,
(i) Numbers or diversity of species.
. (ii) Uhique species.
W /A (iii) Barriers and/or corridors o
(iv) Flsh or wildlife habitat.
(f) NOISEa
,
(g) LIGHT AND GLARE. ~..(h) LAND USE. ,
~//A (i) NATURAL RESOURCES. , e
(1) Rate of use. ,
40 Nonrenewable resources. • '
RISK OF EXPLOS
ION OR HAZARDOUS EMISSIONS t,
(2) ELEMENTS OF THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT.
(a) POPULATION.
(b) HOUSING. "e P-
(c) TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. '
~ W Vehicular transportation generated. .
• (ii) Parking facilities.
(tii) Transportation systems. E(iv) Movement/circulation of people or qoods., ~/$k- (v) Waterborne, rail and air trafflc. • •
~ (vl) Traffic hazards. . ~ • .
f
j .
(d) PUBLIC SERVICES. ~ - ' (i) Fire. '
" (lf) Poliee. - - - _ _ r - _ - - ~
(iii) School s .
(Iv) Parks or other recreatlonal facilities. (v) Maintenance.
(vi) Other governmental servlces. (e) ENERGY.
(i) Amount required. ,
(Ii) Source/availabtlity o
UTILITIES.
N/~4 (i-) E ne rg y._
(ii) Communicattons.
(iii) WateC. ~
(iv) Sewer,
(v) Storm Water. # ~
(vl) Solid waste o
(D1~
(g) HUMAN HEALTH (including mental health).
(h) AESTHETICS,
(i) RECREATION.
: A
ARCHEOLOGICAL/HISZ'O RICAL o
(k) ADDITIONAL POPULA'I'ION CHARACTERISTICS . .
r
a
(1) ECONOMIC IMPACT
- • - .,r,....._ , .f
~ i l.~ ~~=~.r.~~ 'c~~.~
.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I'I
1'UBLIC wOHKS bUILU1NG N 811 JEFFERSON S7HEtT
PHUNL 456-2274
~ a Q
' ` , ~ ~L ~ u Df'6' ~ a \ SPpKANE, WASHINGTUN 99201
• , f
♦
T0: W. M. Investrnents
12720 E. Nora
Spokane, tJath ington 99216
, FROtI: Fred L. Dayharsh, Planning Director
DATE: July 25, 1978
SUBJECT: Summerfield East EIS
We have received your $500.00 and signed Administrative Expense Agreement.
We are familiar with and approve of Inland Pacific Engineering Co., as your
choice for a consulting firm.
We are enclosing an ECPA application form, and urge your serious consideration
of this "one stop" process. The main advantages of ECPA are that DOE will
identify all required state permits within 15 days of their receipt of the app-
lication, and if you desire, centrally process these permits. If you wish to
avail yourself of this process, please complete the application form and return
to Tori Mosher.
Recent changes in EIS administrative procedures within our Department may result
in a less than expeditious job of bringing the draft EIS to publication. We
will, however, exert our best possible efforts and hope we can expect your
cooperation in this project.
Enclosure
CC: Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
E. 12706 Nora
Spokane, bJashington 99206
T.D.C.
E. 12929 Sprague
Spokane, 4Jashington 99206
4p
_ , -
~ • ; , i PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET
, PHONE 456-2274
; A r7
..y ' ~ "i~U r! • ~
w ` SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
, e . , ' • , t-:a•'
SP01<ANE COUP/TY COURT HOUSE
TO : S~. " # ,I~~~-74~ - A
,A, ~ ~ ' ~~r~ 4- ~ a ~ ~ ~
FROM: Spokane County Planning Department Date
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, 4iIA 99201
509-456-2274
Attention: A14441 4~ ~ ~
I,/
REFERENCE: LEAD AGENCY DESIGIVATION
OF SPOKANE COUNTY
Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act, WAC 197-10-20J( 3) ,
~~~?V ?t ~~~~veo'
a dividion of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGEiVCY,
is the ?1EAD .4GENCY for the following described project:501"MA"~jR-D 01~a
The following is an explanation for this determination:
If your agency feels i-t should be LEAD AGENCY, please contact the office above.
rew
r' d
. `
~
1 \
.j
.
sEPA ENTVIROiJII1~NTAL ircPACT STATEI,tEr1T
ADMIi1ISTRATI`'E EXPLNSE AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between
Spokane County, a municipal corporation of the State oi'Washing-
ton, having oPfices for the transaction of business at West 1116
Droadway, Spokane, Washington, ~9201, hereinafter referred to as
the "County", and , havin ;
ofI'ices for the transactlon of business at E. 1 Z?Zd N)OQ--k ~ , -
1242A SP946uE , :5P6Ko%r4E uJ*54t,nk~~4qtI6 9920&, hereinafter
referred to as the "Applicant", jointly, hereinafter referred to
along with the County as the "Parties."
i T rd E s S ET H :
1rtHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act
of 1971 as amended, and the Vjashington Administrative Code Chapter
197-10, Spckane County has prepared an environmental ordinance; and
1,111ERCAS, Pursuant to Spolcane County \d\e Section 11. 50.860,
when an environmAntal impact statement is required for a private pro-
posal, the County shall require tnat the private applicant reimbur3e
Spokane County for cPrtain administrative costs which are related
to the production of the draft EIS, review of comment responses,
and production of the final iIS, as wel-ll as mailing and printing
costs; anc3 .
WHEREAS, the applicant hereinabove has aereed to under-
take tha production of an EIS and in conjunction therewith desires
to formalize tivith Spok-ane County his obligation to reimburse
Spokane County for certain administrative costs in conjunction
;vith the prrparation of the draft LIS, comments on the same, and
production of the final EIS;
NO141, THEZEFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual
promises set for.t}1 hereinaf'ter, the partiAs hereto do agree as
OVE R
.
~
- , /
1
f OI.IOWS :
1. The applicant recognizes his reaponsibility and
legal obligation to assist the County in the-production of an EIS,
including draft EIS, and comments on the same as set forth wlthin
Spokane County Code Section 11.20. 1123(1) ( 3) ( j} ) for the i'ollowing
described project:
.54) rA MtA~zj~)
hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal."
2. The partles recognize that Spokane County pursuant
to Spokane County Code Section 11.50.860(3) shall recover from
ths applicant a1.1 such costs incurred by Spokane County in
administering (1) the production of the drafL EIS for the pro-
posal, (2) the review comment responses related to the draft EIS
i'or the proposal and (3) the production of the final EIS fori the
proposal, as well as any other expense such as printing and mail-
ing which Spokane County shall perform in con,junction with the
above three administrative functions either ss 3 result of State
laws, County ordinances or at the request of the applicant.
3. The basis for all charges in paragraph 2 hereinabove
shall be as follows:
(a) Upper level ataff time will be billed at the
hourly rate paid by Spokane County to staff inembers providing
such aervices. In computing the hourly rate, all fringe benefits,
.
including but not necessarily limited to pension and medieal will
be included.
(b) Printing and mailing costs shall be those
costs actually incurred by 5pokane County in performing-said
printing or mailing including, but not necessarily limited to
employees' salaries (computed in the same manner as Bet forth in
-2-
L AA
.
.
. ~
r + -
subparagraph (a) hereinabove) and aetual costs of supplies (paper,
stamps, and envelopes).
4. The applicant shall deposit an initial amount of
$ EDC), oo with the Spokana County Planning Department
for payment of all costs as set i'orth in paragraph 3. The
Spokane County Planning Department after receipting the moneys
. will transmit said rroneys to the Spokane County Treasurer who
will deposit the moneys in the Spokane County Current Expense
.Fund, The Spokane County Planning Department shall maintain a
separate ledger for this proposal termed " 5QMMFRT11ELb EA-Sl
proposal." No County staff inember will participate with the
. 8pplicant in the administrative responsibilities of Spokane
County aa the lead agency pursuant to Spokane County Code
Section 11.50.860(3) until the applicant has deposited with the
Spokane County Planning Department said initial deposit amount
or auch additional moneys as provided for herein. The County
Planning Department shall voucher against the ledger account
for this proposal all actual costs incurred as provided for here-
in.
Whenever ths ledger account set up pursuant to the
terms of this agreement reaches an amount of $ 9,0.00 ,
the applicant agrees to deposit an additional aum ot $Z?\/l ~ V
which shall be deposited and vouchered against in the same raanner
as the initial deposit.
I1`, af'ter the completion of the functions called for
within Spokane County Code Section 11.50.860(3) by Spokane Countiy,
there sLill remains within the special ledger account for the
proposal certain unvouchered moneys, Spokane County shall pay
over all remaining moneys to the applicant.
ovG R 3-
~
L
1
f
•
IN WITIJESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have c used
this agreement to be executed on the ~ day of ,
~
1977.
BOARD OF CQUNTY COMMISSIONERS
0F SPO ANE COUNTY, WAS GTON
-
- ATTEST:
VERNON W 0 AND
Clerk e Board ~ .
ay, -
' .
puty lerk
d7
APPLICAN
~
~
_
r~+
~
,c/%4
. .
41 ' AGCNCY RL•'SPONSL FOEt.M Ta ~rq Q r' 7 J~ 7~
/
DATE: Z tv
TO. f~Jq rCl~ ~C
;
FROM : N ame : p i'L (de A., ~
Title:
Agency: ~ ' / -~~Z ~ SUBJECT : Lead Agency : - ` ~ 42
r'
Applicant: _
c- 1. S c' h~/,'✓ ;'s i iz ~ er c /•tc ~
Project: v~~»er~ie%~ 1-'2 19 /e,7` , D.,
i
I NAVE REVIEWED TNE C. f a q' A ro EALe, y AT e Q_4,) AND :
Env.Ck. List, Prop.-Final-Dec. of Signif. or Non Signif., DELS - r'EIS
WATER QUALITY
A. Review For Approval Required
1. Septic tank W/17,500 G.P.D. or 50 or more services
2. Mechanical system or lagoon W/3500 G.P.D. or 10 or more services.
3. Commercial or industrial facility.
4. NPDES Permit required
5. State Permit required ECEIVED
BE.I.S. PreParation Re~1uested R C. G.W.I. Preparation Requested J U L 2 51978
D. Environmental Checklist Requested
E. Water Quality Standards Modification Required SPOKIIhE COUNTY
P~NNING DEPARTME~
Applicant To Be Notified
F. No Comment On
G. No Objection To
I.I. Detailed Comments Attached
AIR QUALITY (In Counties of Jurisdiction)
A. Notice of Construction Required
B. Burning Permit Required
C. Detailed Comments Attached I
SOLE SOURCE (EPA llesignation)
A. Project Within Aquifer (Recllarge Zone)
B. EPA Review Appears Necessary
C. Yroject Within Streamflow Zone
o ~e dr I 004p,04 e 4 po4 E A Cd 4 E C. 4-~5 * Av 0 ~ aT
Ti r1 Ft•t~ ~ ~ c. ~2 6~/ i 6~ 4F.T-%5 /
P REPARED BY :
T I 'rt,r .
. r
UST VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO, 361
DARRULL A. W A1.I.E1t. Supr"awndent
R ECEIVED 1RENTWOOD ELEME~ITARY SCHOOL
VIROII LUDtN, /rfnctpel
ToloPhorte WA 6-0770
E1a701 w•11••1•r-Spokano, WosA. 99116
DEl~ 20 ` v sV
SPQKANE COUMTY December 12, 1978
PLANNlN6 DEPARTMFNT
Mr. John Sweitzer
Inland Pacific Engineering & Canstruction Corp.
E. 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, 6dashington 99216
Dear Mr. Sweitzer:
Re: Proposed Summerfield East development
For the safety and welfare of the children of the Trentwood
Elementary School, both during and after construction of homes in
the proposed Summerfield East plat, the following proposal is
submitted:
That the develapers install a permanent 8 foot high cyclone
type fence on the back of all lots bordering the playground
of the Trentwood Elementary School.
That only three (3) walk-through lockable gates be installed;
one each on the north, east, and west side of the playground.
That the fence be installed prior to the start of home
constructian.
That all expense for the installation of the fence be born
by the plat developers. .
, Respectfully submitted,
~ ~~G lC
Mr, Virgil Luden, Principal
Trentwood Elementary School
cc: Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 721 Jefferson
1•
1 ~
i ~
.S.TATC.
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF GAME
0 0~ ' y
% x WASHINGTON 600 North Capitol Way/Olympia, Washmgton 98504 206/753-5700
`'y~ 1859 ;,oy Dixy Lee Ray
Governor
December 22, 1978
R ECEIVEsah
Fred Dayharsh, Director ~AN 0 6n 19%y
Spokane County Planning Department
N 721 Jefferson SPOKANE Spokane, tidashington 99260 PCANlV1NG DFAR~~~~
~~'tENT
RE: Summerfield East Draft EIS
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
We have reviewed you document as requested. Our comments
follow. Please forgive our late response.
It appears the section describing existing fauna on the site
was put together in a rather hasty fashion from other impact
statements. White tailed jack rabbits do not occur on the
site, though they are listed. "Ruffled grouse" are a non-
existent species. Ruff e~d, grouse do occur in Spokane County
but not on the project site. It is redundant to refer to
"song birds, sparrows, an d the robin", as sparrows an d robins
are song birds themselves. The bir ds listed appear to be a
random sample of what could be found, rather than the
predominent or characteristic ones.
tiJe were also puzzled by reference to marmots, jack rabbits,
skunks, feral dogs, groun d sauirrels an d others as "migratory
species," as th ey are all very much sedentary where they occur.
Even if the authors meant "transient" instead of "migratory,"
the term would have been inaccurate except for deer and mam-
malian predators.
Section 5.1.a states the familiar misconcention that small
animals will be forced to relocate, but should remain in
the area. This is, of course, not true. When habitat is lost,
all the f auna is lost, large an d small. Though they may move
into neighboring areas competition between residents and
• refugees soon r-effuces populations to normal levels. Though
wildlife populations fluctuate cyclically, these fluctuations
ref lect the carrying capacity of the habitat.
Other impacts not discussed are the effects of domestic pets
such as dogs and Qats, which become serious and unnatural
predators in wildlife habitat adjacent to residential develop-
ments, as they do not kill out of necessity, and their
4CBO 3
. ~
. ~
r
~ . -2-
numbers are not related to the size of populations of wildlife
they har ass.
The increased light and noise also has a negative imp act on
adiacent wildlife habitat.
One measure which would help to mitigate adverse impacts
would be a covenant requiring the fencing or leashing of
domestic pets when not under the direct supervision of their
owners.
We hope our comments will be of some help.
Very truly yours,
THE DEPARTMENT OF GAME
~
. ~
~ ~ /.Pineo, . Douglass Applied Ecologist
Hab itat Management Division
DAP: jd
. . 40
o
Spohms ~
Rsgoomf P ;ao~mo~~ C@dwomm
TRANSPORTATIOH STUDY DIVISION Phone 509-456-4325
December 18, 1978
Mr. Jose M. Urcia
Spokane Regional Planning Conf.
Room 353, City Hall
Spokane, Washington 99201
Subject: Summerfield East Environmental Impact Statement Report
Dear Mr. Urcia:
Summerfield East is a proposed 268 lot subdivision located north-
west of the Wellesley Avenue and Progress Road intersection. The
characteristics of this subdivision are:
- Size 91 acres
- 268 lots with houses built over a six-year period
- 2.9 lots per gross acre
- Lot size 10,000 square feet
- 4.36 lots per net residential area
- Estimated population 938 persons
- Estimated 29144 one-way trips per day (8 per jH.U.)
This subdivision is in compliance with the 1968 Land Use Plan.
Page 45 of the Summerfield East Report has a typographical error
in the table on Population Growth in the Spokane area. The data
labeled as Spokane County should be Spokane City.
Very truly yours,
< 4LAdc~4
Robert A. Vaughan, P.E.
Transportation Study Director
RAV /FEL 1j f
ADDRESS REPLY TO: SPOKANE REGIONAL PLANNING CONFERENCE, ROOM 353, CITY HALL, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
bSTATFO~~
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES
= WASH1NGTON 115 General Admm►stration Buddmg, Olympia, Washington 98504 206/753-6600
~y'~ l889 ~~y DIXS! j..26 RaSI
Governor
December 5, 1978
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Department
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Pnr. Dayharsh:
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Summerfield East
Spokane County WRIA T-55
We have reviewed the above described statement, and offer the following
comment.
Important foodfish resources in the area is limited to planted juvenile
salmon in Roosevelt Lake. Measures to reduce impurities entering the
Spokane River and adherence to state water quality standards are our
primary concerns.
We note mitigative measures discussed on p. 22 and feel that proper
containment of surface runoff either on-site or near site would help
aleviate downstream impacts and also guard water quality too.
Thank you for seeking our comments.
Sincerely,
~Ji
-
Gordon Sandi
Director •
~e
mr
cc: DOE
GAME
ECEIVE
D
, .
1_ ~i
SpOKAIVE COUNTY
DEPARTMENT
_Qao 3
i
s1'nr~
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY
WASHINGTON Qlympia, Washington 98504 pV-11 206/753-2800
Dix Lee Ra
f 889 ~ y y
' Gouernor
December 4, 1978
~
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Department
, North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
! Thank you for providing us with review copies of your draft environ-
mental impact statement for "Summerf ield East, Planned Residential
Development."
Your well written impact statement was reviewed by Department of
Ecology staff, both here in Olympia and in our Eastern Regional
Off ice in Spokane. We wish to offer the following comments for
your consideration prior to preparation of the final EIS:
l.) The Summary of the Contents of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (page viii) should be updated to contain, at a mini-
mum, the Draft Summary Report of '208' Water Quality Results
and Cause Eff ect Relationships for Water Quality in the Spokane
Aquif er conclusion, that moisture from precipitation as
well as irrigation, runoff, waste disposal and other sources
percolates from the ground surface to the aquifer and carries
with it salts and other constituents." Additionally, it should
be noted that one of the recommendations of this report is
quoted as follows: "Urbanization has been shown to lead to
water quality deterioration and possibly is creating a public
health risk at current levels of development (bacteriological,
heavy metals). Land use and control or mitigating measures to
offset water quality changes which might be prompted by urban
land uses should be initiated. In other words, further land
development should be curtailed or corrective or mitigative
measures for runoff and percolation initiated to hold pollutant
load to the aquifer at or below its present level to prevent
future aquifer water quality deterioration."
2.) We were pleased to note that this proposal provides for both
dry sewers and a location for any future on-site treatment
facility. The flexibility of this arrangement to meet future
needs and/or circumstances is an excellent planning example.
An additional aspect to this effort which should be considered
would be the expansion of dry sewers to provide pipe not only
to the curb but also require builders to dry sewer into the
homes. This situation would allow minimal costs to homeowners
if hookup to a central sewer system becomes possible or if an
on-site plant is required.
_QR0 3
Mr. Dayharsh
December 4, 1978
Page Two
Should you have questions, please contact Mr. Larry Peterson of
our Spokane Office (456-2926).
Yours very trul ,
eter R. Haskin
Environmental Review Section
PRH:me
0
ECEIVEID
°Ee i ~ ~~"a
5~OKAIVF COUNTY
PCANNING aEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM December 5, 1978
T0: Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director FROM: Ray Card, '208' Study Project Manager
SUBJECT: Environmental Impact Statement, Summerfield East
The '208' draft "Cause and Effect" report written by Dr. Larry Esvelt
was released for public use shortly before this draft EIS was written.
Dr. Esvelt has made some interesting conclusions regarding mans activities
on the land surface and its effects on water quality. I would like to see
the data contained in that report included in the final EIS for Summerfield
East.
E1V E
R E C
J C 1978
~ ~:r;
SPOKANE GOUN1Y
Pwmi% DEPARTNi_liT
~
, . ~
a ,r 3TAT'~ O
b y STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION I¢-01
WASHINGTON Highway Adrrurustranon Buddmg, O
lymPia, Washmgton 98504 206/753-6005
ibbo Dixy Lee Ray
Gouernor November 22., 1978
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane Cowlty Planning Department
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Spokane County
Surunerfield East
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
We ha.ve reviewed the subj ect docwnent and have the following comments :
We asswne that the 2,100 plus trips generated daily by the development
will be routed on SR 290. At present it appears tha.t the intersections
of SR 290 and Pines Road and Argonne Road will adequately handle the
traffic. However, closer to the city the intersections are almost to ,
capacity, therefore a slight increase in traffic volwne will i.mpact these
intersections. Also, the construction of the Hamilton Street Bridge will
attract an additional traffic load to SR 290. With these facts in mind,
we feel the statement on page 51 about all roads having ample capacity
is misleading and should be corrected to address impacts to specific
intersections, j
If you have any auestions about these comQnents, please call me at
753-3811. ~
~
Sincerely,
ROBERT S. NIELSEN
Assistant Secretary '
Public Transportation and Planning
' Al ~2 ~
By: WM. P. ALBOHN ,
Environmental Planner
~
RSN:tml
WPA/WBH
cc : iN . R. Horning ~
C H. B. Ashford ~
~ v R. Albert N tD
Environmental Section O V
p spo 19?d ~
IqNN~-kqN f Co j
~ DEPqRNTY
t4jEN j ~
-10). 3
~
I
• • 40 II
II
I
Or'VICL OP COUNTY L:NriTNL:F1i
i
5pokane Caunty, , Washington
llatie Dec. 5, 1978
T0: Fred Davharsh. Directorof Plannina
FROM: ~
Dobratz o
SUBJECT: Draf~ Environm act Statement Summerfield East ~
The following comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement
for Summerfield East are submitted by the Utilities Department for ,
your review. Additional information on Transportation/Circulation ~
and Water will be submitted separately. ~
I
Water: Two different estimates are included in the draft
EIS as to the peak sumrner time flow on water consumption. On pages 34 and V'iii appear "2,000 gallons per lot" and/or "532,000 gallons per day", but on pages 26 and 61 these ,
figures are "2,500 gallons per lot" and/or "665,000 gallons
per day". Both seem high for consumption per lot based on
3.5 persons and small lot sizes (10,040 S.F.)
Drainage: The existing Forker Road basin drainage problem
may involve litigation prior to it's resolution due to the
presence of the inadequate canal. Because of this and because ~no storm water management plan for this basin is anticipated I
to be forthcoming soon, storm drainage facilities are to be included
that will insure the safety of the proposed project and adjacent 'areas. Storm drainage facilities similar to those described in
the ADDENDUM TO StJMMERFIELD DRAINAGE REPORT in APPENDIX A appear
to be adequate. '
~
'
r ~
• ` .
40
' r
, c _ ~ _ _a ` ~ ~ \ i _ ` _ !J f' %1I ~ \ ~~~l1JC/~ ~i~~►.a~Y' ' ~
i ~
COUNTY ENGINEER ~
ROBERT S. TURNER
,
~DLt COUNTY ENGINEER ~
~
~ ll Y
SPOKANE COLM1TY COURT t10USE December 5, 1978
T0: Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director -
Planning Department
FROM: Gary Kennaly, Planning & Traffic Division Enginee~y~
SPokane CountY Engineer's Office
SUBJECT: Draft EIS Review of Summerfield East
We have completed our review and analyais of the Draft EIS and offer the following comments
for your consideration.
Section 4. Transportation/Circulation
1. Trent Avenue should be identified as SR 290 becau8e it is a State
Highway and is under the jurisdiction of the State Departcnent of
Transportation not the County Road Department.
2. In addition to the arterials mentioned in the Draft, Forker Road
and Progress R.oad are designated arterials, adjacent to and pro-
viding direct access to the proposed development but not mentioned
in this portion of the Draft.
3. I1ue to operational and geometric characteristics of Forker Road,
additional right of may dedication and construction of left turn
facilitiea may be required to mitigate pvssible trsffic safety
hazards from traffic entering this proposed development from Forker
R.oad.
4. Same statement as #3 only referring to Progress Road.
5. Same statement as #3 only referring to Wellesley Road.
b. No mention as to impacts or provisions for pedestrian and/or
biker facilities on roads proposed in the plat. Sidewalks on neigh-
borhood collector arterials are required and will partially address
pedestrian fecilitiea. To date the neighborhood collector arterials
contained in this plat proposal have not been designated.
. ' r • ' ~
Page 2
Fred Dayharsh
Draft EIS Review of Summerfield Eaet
7. Pedestrian and/or biker facilities were not addreased for existing
arterials of Forker Road, Progress Road and Wellesley Avenue which
are all adjacent to the proposed development and uhich does pro-
vide access to students traveling to the elementary, junior and
high schools.in the immediate vicinity of the proposal.
U.S. EN NMENTAL PRO. TECTIOtWENCY
Q;-JEO STq)~, R E G I O N X
s
2n> A >v 1200 SIXTH AVENUE
w SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
o Q
illT G~`O=
~t PRO~'E R E C E
REPLY TO
ATTN OF M/S 443 ~
NOV 1 7 1976 N U V~~'
Fred Dayharsh, Di rector SPpKA
Spokane County Planni►7g Department PLANNiNG ~o ~~uNrr
N. 221 Jefferson EPARTMENT
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
We have completed our review of your draft environmental impact statement
for Summerfield East, a residential development in Spokane, Washington
and would like to submit the following comments for your consideration.
Page 33 indicates that there is a water well 300 feet north of Wellesley
Avenue; however the EIS text does not state the use (domestic or irrigation)
of this water. The final EIS should indicate the use of the water and
whether or not other nearby wells are used as a source of domestic water.
If the Wellesley water is used as a source of domestic water, we believe
that periodic water quality analysis should be performed to determine if
surface runoff water and septic tank effluent from the surrounding homes
are degrading the ground water. The final EIS should present a plan to
determine if 'lacal ground water is being degraded after home construction
has occurred and a mitigation plan should the above plan indicate that
ground water quality is being adversely affected.
The EIS's discussion'of ground water quality presents ground water charac-
teristics for several we11s within a mile of the proposed development but
does not present such characteristics for the Wellesley Avenue well whose
quality is stated as "excellent." The final EIS should present the water
quality characteristics of the Wellesley water as it should be representa-
tive of the water under the proposed development. The characteristics
shauld then be compared to the applicable drinking water quality standards.
We appreciate the opportunity to review this draft environmental impact
statement. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Dennis Ossenkop, of rrly
staff, should you have questions or desire further information regarding
our comments. We can be reached at (206) 442-1285.
Sincerely,
p.M,x, J'cl.in.6v-4.1 tic-
Alexandra B. Smith, Chief
Environmental Evaluation Branch
4 100,00'
UN[T'ED S'TA'TES aEPARTMENT OF AGRICLILTURE
$OIL CQNSERVATIOIV SERVICE
Room 360 U.S. Courthouse, Spokane, Washington 99201
• Navember 30, 1978
i
Fred Dayharsh, DirectQr
5pokane County Plann:Lng Departrnent
N. 721 Jef£erson
Spokane, Washington 99260 - Dear NJr. Dayharsh ;
_ 'vue have xeviewed tne draft enviranmental intpact statemetit for t;ie _
proposed Summerfield East devel.opment and have the fol1owing comments.
Tt is the palicy of the U.S. Degaartment Qf Agra.culture and the Saii
Coriservatian 5ervice to pramote the retention af prame agTicultural
lands as one way to insure an adequate fOOd supply for future generations.
Ile, therefore, are concerned that the statement ~~ould arecognize this
relata.ariship (zn the section undex shart-term versus lvng-term productivity)
in the light of the averall incrementa1 ioss of prime soils in the County
due ta aT1 similaar development praposals. If this is nat done, there is
no way for the average reader to properly evalu~~e the fu11 cansequence
a£ urban development as intended under the National Environmental Falicy
Act of 1969.
5incerely,
GaleIl S. Br1~~~
CoIBSerV~ti03'liSt
R ECEIVED
6 ~ Q
_5 1978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PlANN1NG DEPAR~~ENT
~
r • ' ,
AIR POIlUTION CONTROI AUTHORITY
POKANE
~ - -N~~
OUNTY
V
November 30, 1978
Fred Dayharsh
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99201
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
After reviewing the draft Envi ronmental Impact Statement
for the Summerfi el d East Devel opment, we wi sh to cl ari fy
two items.
Fi rst, on Page 18 i t is stated "al 1 roads shoul d be paved".
Wi 11 be paved is more proper as the County requi res paving
on all new plats.
Second, the continuing development in that area may be
expected to cause CO problems along Sullivan Road. We would
1 i ke the proponen t to spea k to th i s matter.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this draft
Envi ronmental Impact Statement.
Sincerely,
13AM K"1*00~
Bi11 Murphy
Air Quality Engineer
L
R E C E V E
NOV 3 0 1978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ADDRESS REPLY TO• SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
W EST 1101 COLLEGE, ROOM 234 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
w ~
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION
OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE-1206-78, ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
SUMMERFIELD EAST, AN ) CONCLUSIONS AND
APPROVED PRELINIINARY PLAT ) DECISION
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Five Fifty, LLC, c/o Ken Tupper, has
been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulations (Section
12.100.118) and RCW 58.17.140.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering
this decision by the Director of the Spokane County Division of Planning.
2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single
family dwellings with a Zone Reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Single Family
Residential (R-1).
3. The subj ect preliminazy plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on
January 30, 1979.
4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and
west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington.
5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential-3.5
(LJR-3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1961 and re-designated to
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January l, 1991 consistent with the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code, and remains unchanged by adoption of the
Phase I Development Regulations on January 15, 2002. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the
proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing UR-3.5 zone.
6. The Comprehensive Plan designated the area of the preliminary plat as Urban at the time
of application acceptance. On August 24, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners
(BOCC) adopted a new Spokane County Comprehensive Plan (see Resolution #1-0799).
The new Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Low Density Residential.
7. The subject properiy is located inside of the Urban Growth Area (UGA).
8. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for
the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and
department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section 12.100.118
(Extensions of Time) of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used
as a basis for this decision.
Section 12.400.118 states that "The Director may administratively approve an extension
provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat
or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further
provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply."
• , .
~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 2
1) That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last
extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development
consistent with the original approval;
RESPONSE: Five (5) phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized for a
total of 1591ots with 1091ots remaining to be finalized. The most recent phase,
consisting of 25 lots, was finalized in October, 2002.
2) That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains
generally consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and
the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finaliaing the plat or binding site plan,
which shall include one, but is not limited to, the following:
a. surveying the lots within the development;
b. arranging for public services to the site;
c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision,
short subdivision, or binding site plan;
d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary
subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval.
RESPONSE: The preliminary subdivision remains consistent with the original plat that
was approved. In addition, the applicant has finalized 159 originally approved lots,
with 1091ots remaining.
3) That at the time the preliminary plat approval was granted, development of the
proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet
available. This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project
sponsor would normally fund.
RESPONSE: Not applicable. - 4) That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the
plat within the five (S) year time period.
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
9. This is the eleventh request for a time e3ctension. The total life of the preliminary plat has
been approximately 24 years.
10. The proposal has been circulated to all affected agencies and departments for comment.
Additional andlor revised conditions of approval have been recommended by the Spokane
County Division of Engineering and Roads. These recommended conditions of approval
are included below. -
11. The applicantJowner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with
Section 12.100.18 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an
additional extension of time.
.
, , • , , . ~ ~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 3
CONCLUSIONS
BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the
expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following
conclusion is made:
The proponent has demonstrated progress toward completing the preliminary plat as
evidenced in the above Findings of Fact and there are no significant changed conditions
which would render filing of the plat contrary to the public health, safety or general
welfare. Therefore, a one (1) year extension of time is warranted.
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request
for application PE-1206-78 is hereby approved until February l, 2004, and subject to those
conditions specified by the Division of Planning Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision
dated January 11, 1996, updated as follows: New conditions are illustrated in bold text and
revised conditions are illustrated as s4i or underlines.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
1. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for one (1) year, specifically to
February 1, 2004. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written
request no later than thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date.
2. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (LJR-3.5) zone, as amended.
3. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition
application submittal and approval.
4. A final plat name/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such
name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee.
5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
6. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance
with these Findings and Conditions of approval.
7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. -
Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received7-
with the submittal of the final plat.
8. The final plat map sha11 indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all
private or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement:
• .
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 4
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the iime building permits are
requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat"
9. Four (4) current certificates of title sball be furnished to the Planning Departznent prior to
filing the final plat.
10. Prior to filing all or a portion of a final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or
more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the
appropriate assessor's map scale.
11. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat.
12. The final plat sha11 indicate yard setbacks arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or
exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat.
13. The Spokane County Planning Depa.rtment shall prepare and record with the County
Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in
part, by the Planning Department. The notice sbould be recorded within the same time
frame as an appeal and shall provide the following: a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in ~ addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along Forker Road.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall
~ be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
.
No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of
) the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the
. applicant's expense whea roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area., until acquired, shall be private property and raay be used
as allowed in the zone, excegt that any improvements (such as landscaping, pazking,
surface drainage, drainfield, sign or others) shall be considered interim uses.
J I The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub
;Iroad or temporary cul-de-sac:
at "Lot(s) Block(s) are located on a temporary cul-de-sac/stub road. This
temporary cul-de-sac /stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent
~ ~ ~ property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development andlor
circulation needs d.ictate."
~
15. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record.
16. Subsequent extensions of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial
compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance.
17. That the sponsor constructs a 6 foot high chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the
retainage basin in the storm drainage plan.
.
. , .
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 5
18. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control
- Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques.
19. That the sponsor limits the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
20. That the sponsor provides and constructs 6-foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to
hose required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress
Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
2 That the sponsor construct a 6-foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet
~ common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to
~ finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West
Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication
of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of
record.
2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Spokane
County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the ruffent editisn 1998 of the
Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable
standards. The plans and report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to
release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat.
3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under
the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County
Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were
installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that a11
disturbed monuments have been replaced.
4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right-of-
way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
5. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way is to be completed
prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to
cover the cost of construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built"
plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer.
6. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to
County standards and established as county roads.
7. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one-half (1/2) rights-of-way and stub
road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant.
.
. , .
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 6
8. The proposed subdivision sha11 be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane-County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1-0298, as amended, which establishes
regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
~ A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to
Wellington Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road.
10. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right-of-way along Progress Road is required.
~
11. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road.
Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used.
12. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
13. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway
routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record,
and along Wellesley Avenue.
14. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103
and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
15. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should
flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to the road.
16. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the
Spokane County Engineers.
17. There shall be no further finalization of phases, all or a portion of which is within the
Zone-A Floodplain, until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm
water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports.
Storm water management plans shall be developed -prior to finalization of any further
phases.
18. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project
shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance.
19. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206•78,
Sumerfield East are hereby amended as follows:
a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent
grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete
garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation.
b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to include
grading, filling, excavating, paving, constructioq and other development activities).
c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting
homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain.
d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A
Floodplain without a CLOMR.
,
, •
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 7
20. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the
impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of
additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified.
21. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities
regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for
any necessary work."
22. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be
prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the
duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management
practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC
plan is to include, at a minimum, a grading plan, location and details of silt control
structures, and street cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be filtered prior
to discharging into a detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway.
The TESC plan is to be included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer
is to submit the TESC plan and supporting calculations to Spokane County prior to site
disturbance. The TESC major structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed
prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained
throughout the duration of construction, including house construction.
23. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right-of-way will neither be
maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the
County Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County
Engineer, for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This
mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement
of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the
respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the
future. An Operations and Maintenance Manual for the stormwater management system
shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents
submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life
of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a
calculated replacement cost. Homeowners Associations are accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer for carrying out the required maintenance functions and responsibilities.
24. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following described property be held in trust
until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one (1)-foot strip at the
ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul-de-
sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries of the final plat.)
25. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for
driveway approaches to the county road system.
26. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County
standards.
,
. w .
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 8
27. The County Engineer has determined that this project permit is exempt under the
Phase I Development Regulations - Section IV (B) (2b). Future time extensions will
require review by the Spokane County Division of Engineering for concurrency with
the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-
site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on
compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by
the Health District.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future area wide
collection systems.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any
attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record
for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane Regional Health District. Written approval of the easements by
the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
. 3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to
each lot of the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the
recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. -
8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire
protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been
approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (puryeyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to
filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with
~
. ,
. ` ~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 9
their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and
certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan hat
appropriate contractual arrangements have been made vvith the plat sponsor for
construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule.
The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and
inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits
within the plat.
10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane Regional Health District that suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal systems
are available on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized.
11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the
use of on-site sewage systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state:
"Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the
use of on-site sewage systems may be authorized."
14~rTih-e-~ded~ica ory a1lguage~oin~t+he~p~l►at~sha~l~l-s~.~~
"Useo~f pWia~t~'ew"efil an Vwater systems-is prohi'bited:"
14. The-'`~`pla'"-MMIicatio`~v~n~l~l contain statement~t~t7h~ ~ e~t~tliat:
"The public water-syste ,-as approved-by county and s~'te~l~e 'lth~' T` A4tkes,~ ~he-,local fire
district and urveyor will be installed 't 'n_t 's at,_and e_subdivider-u►ill prov de or
indi~id~ua~lid~o~~~~s~i water service aswe~ llwasopi~r-~protect~i~or~toYeach~ot~pr+ior~torsale-~o,~,each`
lot.-W'*W----
DATED THIS 17"HDAY OF JANUARY, 2003
ALAy4n N4
Associate Planner
Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To
file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with a processing fee, payable to the Spokane
County Division of Planning, within ten (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed.
If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Division of Planning at 477-7200.
• y ~ 6
1 I
Extension of Tune Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 10
c: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement
Ken Tupper, Five Fifty, LLC, 322 N. University Rd., Spokane, WA 99206
~
• ~ ~ _ p,~ zw-a
~
Pre-Design Meeting Notes
Spokane County Engineers Office
Aroject Name ~~~i- Project Number /,?r->(,,
Project Sponsor J~~-~.cJ
Sponsor's Engineer
Design
Firn1 Engineer 4;~- .
~
~
N(eeting Date Meeting Time
County Staff Present at Meeting c~cz> t5;~~ ~72~~cd
Other Meeting Attendees
name/represent-ing name/representing name/representing t name/represenung
The Following ltems need to be Disciissed w/ the Desigu Engineer
Gener•ai Ttems
1 a List certain special requirements listed in the Conditions of Approval, E1S, or MDNS This is
not an all-inclusive list The Engineer and Sponsor is responsible for adhering to all Conditions and
design criteria
>
descnption reference
description reference
description reference
description reference
1 b Does the Engineer have a copy of the Examiner's/Staff Conditions of Approval?
2 Include Standard Alan notes in the Road and Drainage Plans
. ~
Pre-Dcsign Meettng Notes for ProJECt Page 2
Spokane Counly Public Works
Road Plans
1 Road Classifications and Design Criteria
f
#1 ; #2 #3 #4
~j i
Street Name
~ S ~
Classificatton E
~ILA3 L--, c, • ~
RoadwaY Width, W 3(o r ~ ~
~
1.3
t
Minimum ribht-of-way width <
see note (1)
,
Min Horiz Curve w/ super
M_in Horiz Cutve w/o super '
~
General Land Slope/Terrain
~ i I
Design Speed, Illph i
Curb Type R Clear Zone 'e (see Sec 3 15) ;F_
~
Sidewalk required? (yes/no)
Note Additional right-of-way~nay be given by the Sponsor
Discussion
2 According to the Design Engineer; what is the maximum number of units which will have
access from a single roadway? What is the max allowed per Sec 1 03?
3 Minimum intersection spacing is 300' for along a Principal or Minor Arterial (per Sec 3 04),
and 150' for a Collector or Local Access street What spacing is provided for this project?
36 0 ` - o~C
. ~
Pre-Design Meetuig Notes for Project. Pagc 3
Spol:ane County Public Works
4 Are any off-slte slope easements needed, or off-site right-of-way acquisitions needed? If so,
b
desc~VVZ/~
5 What type of turn-arounds are needed? (i e cul-de-sac, haminerhead, etc )
~
Street Name Turn-around Type Location
;
a
~
6 Road SurFacing Requirements (Sec 3 16)
a) What method in determining road surfacing requirements does the Design Engineer propose
to use (i e AASHTO Design Method, County thickness table, or other)?
b) Provide the Design Engr a copy of the Soil Sample Procedures, Design Report Format &
Alternate Pavement Design Table
7 Does the Engineer plan on applying for any Design Deviations? Yf so, briefly describe below
Please note that approval of all Design Deviation's must be obtained prioc- to construction
plan submittal
VOAAeE " ~ .
Storm Drainage
I Basin Map
a) Did the Design Engineer bring to the meeting a basin map? lf so, does the basin
map show topography and sufficient information to be useful? ~ O
b) Does the basin map depict any contributing off site runoff flowing onto the property? _Pe>Zbf gLe
Does it appear to be correct?G*L If not, explain
c) Is a site visit needed to verify the basin limits? ~,rS Schedule for
{Note Concurrence with County Engineer's on basin linuts is renuired pnor to plc-ul subnuttal }
2 Is the site located within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? What type of water
quality treatment is proposed by tlle Design Engineer?
. ~
Pre-Design Meetmg Notcs for Project Page 4
Spokane County Aublic Worlcs
3 What subsurface investi~ations, if any, are needed with this project to make sure the
proposed disposal process will function as pla.rmed
4 Are there downstream conditions which will affect the design of drainage facilities if so
describe possible mitigative measures
41Q .
5 Is maintenance access provided to each GPA swale or drainage pond? If there is something
unusual, what requirements wei-e given to the Deslgn Engr 9
C"t,
6 What does the Developer/Engr propose for- pi-oviding for perpetual maintenance of the
drainage facilities? Please briefly describe proposed mechanism, and what is needed to
accomplish this
< .
7a What Design Storm(s) should be used in the course of analysis (i e 10-yr, 50-yr, etc )
'/€J - i~ , i i r= _
7b Is a Detention or Retention system proposed? Please describe
8 Are Erosion Control Measures required with this project? If so, briefly descnbe applicable
requirements
'S'- Z,:> . J~"c.~-
9 Is a second Pre-Design Meeting needed?
-
Prc-Design Meeting Notes for Prolect Page 5
Spokanc Couniy Public Works
List of Documents Provided to the Sponsor's Engineer
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
Any eusemertts needed oitt.srde of the plat baundaly, fur drarnage ar other, aye to be acqurred prlor
tv rvad and drcctncrge plurt submalal. 1'he Sponsui• or' SpOYlsor''s Fngeneer shal! prrnwde separcately
a legul descr•lptrun and 1 rtle Commrtmenl(or srmllay pj•avf af owner•.ship) of the affectedpur•cel(s)
for prvposed easement.s.
rl he Suhmittal, C:hecklist, completcd and srgned hy 1he Spon.sor's .~~rigrneer•, ,shall he provlded ivith
each plun .submitlcrl.
Nate: Provirle a copy of thi.c completed document to tlte I)esign Engineer nt the end of tlte pre-
design rneeting.
filename PreDesign meeling
RECEIVED -
Avista Utilities SPOKANE COUNTY
1411 East Mission PO Box 3727
Spokane, Washington 89220-3727 n001 Utllltl@S
Telephone 509~89-0500 J ~
Toll Free 800-727-9170 -
DIVISION OF PLANNING
December 12, 2001
Mr. Brtan Belsby
Wyatt Engineering Inc. -
1220 Not-th Howard
Spokane, WA 99201
RE: Summerfield East, 4`h Addition, Phase 1 subdivision
uear Mi Belsby.
In reference`to the above-mentioned plat, easements are satisfactory and dedicated
thereon as long as utility easements are behind and separate from sidewalks as shown in
plat.
Becczirse some Pluts have been modifzed after review and acceptance by Avista with
rcgard to ectilety easements, we request that this office be notified if any sacbstctntial
clzanges, sccch as the addition of Borcler Easements, are mucle to the Plat praor to
recvrclireg It is rtot our antention to cause unnecessary delays or inconvenience.
However, ct is inzperutcve tlzut the servcng utalaty compunies are provicled atleguate space
to cnstall factlctces
If you have any questions, please fee( free to contact me at (509) 495-8536
Sincerely,
iw?- 4~~5 4~6~
Priscilla Sprague
Real Estate Assistant
cc:
Claude Kaler, Avista
An affdiate of Avista Corp
REQUEST FOR PUBLIC RECORDS
Requester's NamLpease Pri t)
z.
Requester's Organizationl- if applicable ~
3. 4 1/ Z 7- L~ N(2 ~v~s~c~~
Requester's Mailing Address (Please lnclude Zip Code)
,
4.
Date of Request Time of Day Requester's Phone Number
5. Nature of Request:
. ~
6. Document(s) Reference Identification from Public Records Index: P>~ ~7 -7O
. . ~ v -
7. Description of Document(s) Requested if Not Identifiable by Reference to Board of County Commissioners of Spokane
County Public Records Index:
8. If the reyuested documents are/or include a list of individuals or companies, state the purpose for which the list is intended
and sign the following acknowledgment: I promise that the list of individuals or fums furnished hereunder will not be used
for commercial purposes.
Purpose: PUBLIC RECORDS OF THE AGENCY ARE PROVIDED FOR INSPECTION AND COPYING SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING REGULATIONS:
(1) No person shall knowingly alter, deface, or destroy public records of the agency.
(2) Original copies of public records to the agency shall not be removed from the offices of the agency.
(3) Care and safekeeping of public records of the agency, furnished pursuant to a request for inspection or copying, shall be the
sole responsibility of the requester.
(4) Records furnished for public inspection or copying shall be returned in good condition and in the same file sequence or
organization as when furnished.
(5) Boisterous or otherwise disruptive conduct by those requesting public records of the agency shall not be permitted.
(6) The charge for providing copies of public records is fifteen cents ($0.15) per 8'/2 by I 1 or 8'/z by 14 inch page.
„r.
~9
R s er's Signature/ ~
f
OFFICE USE ONLY
Records provided by: Records returned in good condition:
Yes/No (inidals)
Comments:
No. of Copies Made: Amount Received: Receipt No.: Received by:
F:\CURREM' PLANNING MASTER FORMS\Misc Maaen\REQUFSf' FON PUBLIC RfCORDS (8A1).dx
,
a Qa
. o
BjGFORE' SPOIKANE COUNT~.' DMSIOIV aF P~ANNING
I1V THE IlAT'T]CR OF AN EXTEi NSION
OF'I'UvIEt REQUEt ST I+'OR PE-1206-789 ) F.IP+DINGS OF FAC'T,
SL►MIIV`~ilERFIEI.I~ EA5T, AN ) COle1CLUSiONS AND
AP]PROVED ]PREi LIMINAR.Y PLrAT ) DECISION
fiHIS MATTER., a request for an extension of tiine from rive Fifty, LLC, c/o Ken Tupper, lias
been received aiid decided u,pon, pursuacst to Spokane Com1ty Subdivisioa regulations (Section
12.100.118) and RCW 58.17. L40.
I+'.[NDINGS OF FAC'i'
l. The individuaJ signing Uelow has bezn properly delegated t,he responsibilifiy for Y•endering
this decision by the Director of the Spokane County Division of Pla.nn.ing.
2. The original proposal was to subdivide appl-oximately 91 acres into 268 lats for si.ngle
fainily dNvellings with a Zone Reclassification from AgriculturaY (A) to Single I'amily
Residential (IZ-1).
3. The subject prelimYnary plat was approved by the FIearing Ex.aininer Comrnittee on
January 30, 1979.
4. The gronosal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and
west ofProgress Road in Section 35, Township 26 rTorth, .[Zange 44 EVdM= Spokane
Couxrty, Washington.
5. The existang zoning of the properfiy descnbed in the application is Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5), previously established as Agiieuliural (A) zoni.ng in 1961 and rz-designated to
Urban Residential-3.5 (LJR-3.5) on Januazy l, 1991 consisfient witi the Prograai to -
Impleznent the Spolcane County Zoning Code, and remairas unclianged by adoption of the
Phase I Development IZegulations on Januaty 15, 2002. Pucsuant to RCW 58.17.195 the
proposal does conform to the requirements of the exYSting UR-3.5 zone.
6: 1he Comprehensive Plau designated the area of the preliminar,y plat as TJrban at the time
of application accepfance. On Augus# 24, 2001, the Board of Couaty Coinmissioners
(BOCC) adopted a new Spokane County Comprehensive Plan (see Resolution #1-0799).
rhe new Comprehensive Flan designates the sub,ject property as Low Density Residential.
7. Tlze subject property is located inside of the Urban Growth Area (UGA).
8. Spolcane County h.as established specific critel-ia for considering the extensiou of ti.me for .
the exgi.uation of prelixnina.ry subdivisions, specifica,lly for regular subdivzsions, annd s
depai-tyneiit policy for short subdivisions. These critena are found in Section 12.100.1 18
(E-xtensions of Tir3ae) of the Spokane County Subdivision Ord'znance annd have been used
as a basis for tlus decision.
Sectian 12.100.118 states that "'The Duector may administrativeiy approve an extension .
provided there are no significant changed conditions vvluch vvould render filing of the plat
oz bi.nding site plan confirary to the public hca.lth, sa.fety or general welfare; and further
provided oj1e or more of the following cizeumstances is found to apply."
,
,
f
• .
`I \
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 2
1) That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last
extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development
consistent with the original approval;
RESPONSE: Five (5) phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized for a
total of 1591ots with 1091ots remaining to be finalized. The most recent phase,
consisting of 25 lots, was finalized in October, 2002.
2) That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains
generally consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and
the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizfng the plat or binding site plan,
which shall include one, but is not limited to, the following:
a. surveying the lots within the development;
b. arranging for public services to the site;
c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision,
short subdivision, or binding site plan,
d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of preliminary
subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval.
RESPONSE: The preliminary subdivision remains consistent with the original plat that
was approved. In addition, the applicant has finalized 159 originally approved lots,
with 1091ots remaining.
3) That at the time the preliminary plat approval was granted, development of the
proposal was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet
available. This provision shall not apply to public utiliry extension which the project
sporrsor would normally fund.
- RESPONSE: Not applicable.
4) That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the
plat within the five (S) year time period.
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
9. This is the eleventh request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has
been approximately 24 years.
10. The proposal has been circulated to all affected agencies and departments for comment.
Additional and/or revised conditions of approval have been recommended by the Spokane
County Division of Engineering and Roads. These recommended conditions of approval
are included below.
:
11. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with
Section 12.100.18 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an
additional extension of time.
~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 3
CONCLUSIONS
BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the
expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following
conclusion is made:
The proponent has demonstrated progress toward completing the preliminary plat as
evidenced in the above Findings of Fact and there are no significant changed conditions
which would render filing of the plat contrary to the public health, safety or general
welfare. Tberefore, a one (1) year extension of time is warranted.
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request
for application PE-1206-78 is hereby approved until February 1, 2004, and subject to those
conditions specified by the Division of Planning Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision
dated January 11, 1996, updated as follows: New conditions are illustrated in bold text and
revised conditions are illustrated as st-ii- or underlines.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
1. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for one (1) year, specifically to
February 1, 2004. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written
request no later than thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date.
2. The proposal sha11 comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (LJR-3.5) zone, as amended.
3. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of
record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition
application submittal and approval.
4. A final plat name/number sha11 be indicated before the final plat is filed, such
name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee.
5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
6. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance
with these Findings and Conditions of approval.
7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat.
Written approval of titility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received
with the submittal of the final plat.
8. The f~n~a~lop~l~a~to ~~~ap~shall cate by a clear, dashed line the=required yard se backs from all`
priua~te o~r~p.~uiiiiii,b,bi~~~roa'd~s«~The~ded~icat~i,o-ngshral~l~corntain~the~foyllo~g~sta ement:
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 4
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the tune building permits are
requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat"
9. Four (4) current certificates of title shall be fumished to the Planning Department prior to
filing the final plat. ~
10. Prior to filing all or a portion of a final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or
more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the
appropriate assessor's map scale.
11. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat.
12. The final plat shall indicate yard setbacks arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or
exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat.
)3. The Spokane County Planriing Department shall prepaze and record with the County
Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquusition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in
part, by the Ptanning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as an appeal and shall provide the following:
~
~ a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in
addition to the existing andJor newly dedicated right-of-way along Forker Road.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall
be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of
the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the
applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be privaie property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parki.ag,
surface drainage, drainfield, sign or others) shall be considered interim uses.
C1,4 The plat dedication shall eontain the following staiement for those lots located on a stub .
road or temporary cul-de-sac:
"Lot(s) Block(s) are located on a temporary cul-de-sac/stub road. This
temporary cul-de-sac /stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent
property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as development andlor
circulation needs dictate."
15. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record.
16. Subsequent extensions of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial
compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance.
17 That the sponsor constructs a 6 foot high chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the
retainage basin in the storm drainage plan.
~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 5
18. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control
Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques.
19. That the sponsor limits the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
20. That the sponsor provides and constructs 6-foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to
hose required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress
Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
2. That the sponsor construct a 6-foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet
- common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to
~ finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West
Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication
of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of
record.
2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Spokane
County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the 1998 of the
Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable
standards. The plans and report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to
release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat.
3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements sha11 be performed under
the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County -
Engineer with "As Bu.ilt" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were
installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all
. disturbed monuments have been replaced.
4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right-of-
way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
5. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way is to be completed
prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to
cover the cost of construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built"
plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. _
:
6. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to
County standards and established as county roads.
7. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one-half (1/2) rights-of-way and stub
road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant. _
.
• ~ G ,
~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 6
8. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1-0298, as amended, which establishes
regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
9 A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to
~ Wellington Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road.
10. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right-of-way along Progress Road is required.
P 11. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road.
Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used.
12. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
13. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway
routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record,
and along Wellesley Avenue.
14. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103
and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
15. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should
flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to the road.
16. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the
Spokane County Engineers.
17. There shall be no further finalization of phases, all or a portion of which is within the
Zone-A Floodplain, until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm
water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports.
- Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further
phases.
18. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project
shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance.
19. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206-78,
Sumerfield East are hereby amended as follows:
a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent
grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete
garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation.
. b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to include
; grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development activities). -
c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting
homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain.
d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A
Floodplain without a CLOMR.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 7
20. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the
impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System warrants the dedication of
additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified.
21. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities
regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for
any necessary work."
22. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be
prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the
duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management
practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC
plan is to include, at a minimum, a grading plan, location and details of silt control
structures, and street cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be filtered prior
to discharging into a detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway.
The TESC plan is to be included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer
is to submit the TESC plan and supporting calculations to Spokane County prior to site
disturbance. The TESC major structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed
prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained
throughout the duration of construction, including house construction.
23. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right-of-way will neither be
maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the
County Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County
Engineer, for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This
mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement
of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the
respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the
future. An Operations and Maintenance Manual for the stormwater management system
shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents
submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life
of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a
calculated replacement cost. Homeowners Associations are accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer for carrying out the required maintenance functions and responsibilities.
24. Appropriate provision sha11 be made that the following described property be held in trust
until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one (1)-foot strip at the
ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul-de-
sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries of the final plat.)
" 25. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for
driveway approaches to the county road system.
26. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County
standards.
t Q ~
~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 8
27. The County Engineer has determined that this project permit is exempt under the
Phase I Development Regulations - Section IV (B) (2b). Future time extensions will
require review by the Spokane County Division of Engineering for concurrency with
the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-
site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on
compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by
the Health District.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future area wide
collection systems.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record andlor any
attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record
for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane Regional Health District. Written approval of the easements by
the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to
each lot of the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the
recorded service area of the"water system proposed toIserve the plat.
8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire
protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been
approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (puryeyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to
filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 9
their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan a.nd
certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan hat
appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for
construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule.
The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and ~
inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits
within the plat.
10. Prior to filing the final plat, the spcrosor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane Regional Health District ihat suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal systems
are available on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized.
11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the
use of on-site sewage systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language on the plat shalt state:
"Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the
use of on-site sewage systems may be authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state:
"Use of private wells and waier systems is prohibited."
14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that:
"The public water system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire
district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for
individual domestic water service as well as fue pratection to each lot prior to sale of each
lot."
DATED THIS 17jHDAY 4F JANUARY, 2003
Tammy n
Associate Pl er
.
Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To
file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with a processing fee, payable to the Spokane
County Division of Planning, within ten (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed.
If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Division of Planning at 477-7200.
.
~ •
I N
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 10
c: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement
Ken Tupper, Five Fifty, LLC, 322 N. University Rd., Spokane, WA 99206
,
I
-
FILE NO: P-1206-78
~
DECLARATION OF MAILING
I, WANDA CLARK, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, do
hereby declare:
I am a citizen of the United States of America and over the age of 18 years.
On the 17" day of January 2003, I caused to be deposited in the United States mail at
Spokane, Washington, with correct United States postage affixed, a true and correct copy of
FTNDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION, EXTENSION OF TIME, a copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to those listed at the end of said decision.
Dated at Spokane, Washington, this 17'h day of January 2003.
~~.r(J1~1(~~
WANDA CLARK
~
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION )
OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE-1206-78, ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
SUM.MERFIELD EAST, AN ) CONCLUSIONS AND
APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT ) DECISTON
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Five Fifty, LLC, c/o Ken Tupper, has
been received and decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulations (Section
12.100.118) and RCW 58.17.140.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering
this decision by the Director of the Spokane County Division of Planning.
2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single
family dwellings with a Zone Reclassification from Agricultuxal (A) to Single Family
Residential (R-1).
3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on
January 30, 1979.
4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and
west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane
County, Washington.
5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1961 and re-designated to
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January 1991 consistent with the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code, and remains unchanged by adoption of the
Phase I Development Regulations on January 15, 2002. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the
proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing UR-3.5 zone.
6. The Comprehensive Plan designated the area of the preliminary plat as Urban at the time
of application acceptance. On August 24, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners
(BOCC) adopted a new Spokane County Comprehensive Plan (see Resolution #1-0799).
The new Comprehensive Plan designates the subject property as Low Density Residenfiial.
7. The subject property is located inside of the Urban Growth Area (LJGA).
8. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for
the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and
department policy for short subdivisions. These criteria axe found in Section 12.100.118
(Extensions of Time) of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used
as a basis for this decision.
Section 12.100.118 states that "The Director may administratively approve an extension
provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render filing of the plat
or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and further
provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply."
. ~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 2
1) That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finulized since the last
extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development
consistent with the original approval;
RESPONSE: Five (5) phases of the original prelirlinary plat have been finalized for a
total of 1591ots with 1091ots remaining to be fina ized. The most recent phase,
consisting of 25 lots, was finalized in October, 2002.
2) That the preliminary subdiviston, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains
generally consistent wtth the original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and
the sponsor has taken substantial steps toward.s finulizing the plat or binding site plan,
which shall include one, but is not limited ro, the following:
a. surveying the lots within the development;
b arranging for public services to the site;
c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary subdivision,
short subdivision, or bindang site plan;
d. the completton of studies or other reguir•ement.s which were part of preliminary
subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval.
RESPONSE: The preliminary subdivision remains consistent with the original plat that
was approved. In addition, the applicant has finalized 159 originally approved lots,
with 1091ots remain,ing.
3) That at the time the preliminary plat approvai was granted, development of the
proposul was conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet
available This provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project
sponsor would normally fund
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
4) That administrative delays huve caused the inability of the upplicant to finalize the
plat within the five (S) year time per•ivd
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
9. This is the eleventh request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has
been approximately 24 years.
10. The proposal has been circulated to all affected agencies and departments for comment.
Additional andlor revised conditions of approval have been recommended by the Spokane
County Division of Engineering and Roads. These recommended conditions of approval
are included below.
11. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with
Section 12.100.18 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an
additional extension of time.
!
♦ ~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 3
CONCLUSIONS
BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the criteria for approving an extension of time of the
expiration date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following
conclusion is made:
The proponent has demonstrated progress toward completing the preliminary plat as
evidenced in the above Findings of Fact and there are no significant changed conditions
which would render filing of the plat contrary to the public health, safety or general
welfare. Therefore, a one (1) year extension of time is warranted.
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request
for application PE-1206-78 is hereby approved until February 1, 2004, and subject to those
conditions specified by the Division of Planning Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision
dated January 11, 1996, updated as follows: New conditions are illustrated in bold text and
revised conditions are illustrated as °*r;UQ *hr^„R-~ or underlines.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
l. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for one (1) year, specifically to
February 1, 2004. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written
request no later than thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date.
2. The proposal shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone, as amended.
3. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of
record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition
application submittal and approval.
4. A final plat name/number shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such
name/number to be approved by the Planning Director/designee.
5. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
6. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance
with these Findings and Conditions of approval.
7. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat.
Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received
with the submittal of the final plat.
8. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all
private or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement:
~ .
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 4
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are
requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat"
9. Four (4) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to
filing the final plat.
10. Prior to filing all or a portion of a final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one or
more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shal] match the
appropriate assessor's map scale.
11. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat.
12. The final plat shall indicate yard setbacks arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or
exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat.
13. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County
Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in
part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as an appeal and shall provide the following:
a. At least 20 feet of reserved fufiure acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in
addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along Forker Road.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall
be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, `208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and Lrtilities. If any of
the above improvements are made within this area, they sllall be relocated at the
applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking,
surface drainage, drainfield, sign or others) sha11 be considered interim uses.
14. The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub
road or temporary cul-de-sac:
"Lot(s) Block(s) are located on a temporary cul-de-sac/stub road. This
temporary cul-de-sac /stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent
property andlor connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or
circulation needs dictate."
15. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record.
16. Subsequent extensions of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial
compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance.
17. That the sponsor constructs a 6 foot high chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the
retainage basin in the storm drainage plan.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 5
18. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control
Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques.
19. That the sponsor limits the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
20. That the sponsor provides and constructs 6-foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to
hose required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress
Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
21. That the sponsor construct a 6-foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet
common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to
finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West
Farms Imgated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication
of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of
record.
2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to the 2001 Spokane
County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the rauffent editien 1998 of the
Spokane County Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all other applicable
standards. The plans and report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to
release of a construction or building permit or approval of the final plat.
3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under
the direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County
Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were
installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all
disturbed monuments have been replaced.
4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public right-of-
way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
5. All construction within the existing or proposed Public right-of-way is to be completed
prior to filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to
cover the cost of construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built"
plans and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer.
6. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to
County standards and established as county roads.
7. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one-half (1 /2) rights-of-way and stub
road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant.
r
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 6
8. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to tlle standards set forth in Spokane County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 1-0298, as amended, which establishes
regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
9. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to
Wellington Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road.
10. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right-of-way along Progress Road is required.
11. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road.
Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used.
12. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
13. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway
routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record,
and along Wellesley Avenue.
14. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103
and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
15. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should
flooding, caused thxough activities of the plat, cause damage to the road.
16. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the
Spokane County Engineers.
17. There shall be no further finalization of phases, all or a portion of which is within the
Zone-A Floodplain, until engineering work is completed to evaluate the impact of storm
water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps and reports.
Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further
phases.
18. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project
shall be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance.
19. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206-78,
Sumerfield East are hereby amended as follows:
a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent
grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for residence and concrete
garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation.
b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to include
grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development activities).
c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting
homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain.
d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A
Floodplain without a CLOMR.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 7
20. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has determined that the
impact of this proposal upon the eYisting County Road System warrants the dedication of
additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified.
21. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead
effecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future
acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or
relocation regarding these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities
regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for
any necessary work."
22. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be
prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the
duration of construction. 1'he TESC plan is to be prepared using best management
practices (BMP's) currently accepted within the Civil Engineering profession. The TESC
plan is to include, at a minimum, a grading plan, location and details of silt control
structures, and street cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be filtered prior
to discharging into a detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway.
The TESC plan is to be included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer
is to submit the TESC plan and supporting calculations to Spokane County prior to site
disturbance. The TESC major structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed
prior to other site work and the TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained
throughout the duration of construction, including house construction.
23. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right-of-way will neither be
maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the
County Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County
Engineer, for the perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This
mechanism shall also provide for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement
of the various components of the drainage system at the end of the service life of the
respective components, and any other improvements that may be legally required in the
future. An Operations and Maintenance Manual for the stormwater management system
shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer, and included in the project documents
submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance, along with a discussion of the design life
of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair and maintenance, and a
calculated replacement cost. Homeowners Associations are accepted by the Spokane
County Engineer for carryiilg out the required maintenance functions and responsibilities.
24. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following described property be held in trust
until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one (1)-foot strip at the
ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul-de-
sacs are required when streets terminate at the plat boundaries of the final plat.)
25. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for
driveway approaches to the counfiy road system.
26. All public roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County
standards.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 8
27. The County Engineer has determincd that this project permit is exempt under the
Phase I Development Regulations - Section IV (B) (2b). Future time cxtensions will
require review by the Spokane County Division of Engineering for concurrency with
the Spokane County Comprehensive Plan.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTXLITES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-
site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on
compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by
the Health District.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future area wide
collection systems.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record andlor any
attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record
for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane Regional Health District. Written approval of the easements by
tlle utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to
each lot of the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lies within the
recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire
protection use shall be approved by the vvater purveyor. Said water plan must have been
approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (puryeyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to
filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 9
their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and
certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan hat
appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for
construction of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule.
The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and
inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits
within the plat.
10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the
Spokane Regional Health District that suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal systems
are available on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized.
11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the
use of on-site sewage systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state:
"Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the
use of on-site sewage systems may be authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state:
"Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited."
14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that:
"The public water system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire
district and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider w-ill provide for
individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each
lot."
DATED THIS 171" DAY OF JANUARY, 2003
~
WM
Tammy ne
Associate Planner
Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled. To
file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with a processing fee, payable to the Spokane
County Division of Planning, within ten (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed.
If you have any questions, please call the Spokane County Division of Planning at 477-7200.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 10
c: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement
Ken Tupper, Five Fifty, LLC, 322 N. University Rd., Spokane, WA 99206
Y
J
1 ~
h
I
S P O K A 1~7" E ' C O U N T Y
A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF PLAi\NING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Scott Engelhard
c/o Sandy Kimball
Spokane Division of Engineering-Development Services; John Hohman
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement; Jeff Forry
Spokane County Fire Protection District No. 1
Trentwood Jrrigation District
East Valley School District No. 361
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner ~
DATE: January 3, 2003
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE-l 206-78; Summerfield East
The Spokane County Division of Plaruung has received the attached request for an
Extension of Time for the preliminary plat of S ammerfield East, PE-1206-78.
If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe that additional conditions
should be made part of the preliminary plat approvai, please forward your comments to
me by January 16, 2003.
Enclosures
c: Ken Tupper, 122 N. Raymond, Spokane, WA 99206
MtvL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHOIVE• (509) 477-7200 • FAX (509) 477-2243 • TDD (509) 477-7133
s
v
r
t A~iikPPLIC/ `TION J -0Ch¢7 r ii{Y!. •
~ 1 1 n}3{ N
~ rl r r r rr~~~ J
A.: r FOR
~ r
~XTE1~~~~~ 4N OF3WE~"
t~ st~~
ftl~~4 ~gb
DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOKATsT, COLWn
~ .
~ :
NAME OF PLAT/FILE NO- Sununerfield East/PE 1206-78 -
_
PARCEL NO. 46353. 9074; 46354. 9050; 46352. 9052; 46352. 9066; 46351~. ~j/VCj
APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL OWNER) • F iv e F i f t y, LL C
MA.ILING ADDRESS• 122 N. Raymond
CZTY: Spokane STATE: WA Zrp: 99206
PHONE: (work) 9 24-1211 (home) - (fax) 9 2 2-019 5
Ig' APPLICANT IS NOT '1'HE OWNER, INCLUDE WRI'Y'TEN OWNER AiJTHORIZATION FOR
THE BELOW OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT• Kenneth-,J: Tupper
MAILING ADDRESS: 122 N. Raymond
CITy; Spokane STATE WA Zip: 99206
PHONE: (Nvork) 9 2 4-1211 (home) - (Fa.a,) 9 2 2- 019 5
1. Has any portson of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized (recorded)?
Yes, see attached.
2. Has a proposed fmal plat, short plat or BSP been subnutted to the Division of Planru.ng?
Yes X No If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized?
Wllat has been the delay? see attached.
3 What progress has occuned What coiidrtions of approval have been completed (such as survey work,
unprovements constructed, departmental approvals obtazned)?
See attached.
Page 1 of 2
Appiication for Extension of Time
4 QVhy has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized'? What has delayed finalization?
See attached.
5 Is this a phased project? Yes x No If yes, please complete tlie following information:
No. of lots originally approved• 268 No of phases finalized to date: 5
No of lots remaining to be finalized: 109 No of acres remaiiung to date 40
YfEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE
(Sigrtature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
I, Kenneth Tupper (pnnt naine) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT
THE ABOVE RESPONSES ARE IVIADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORI) OF T'HE AREA
PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER,
ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON 1-IIS/I-ER BEHALF
ADDRESS: Five Fifty, LLC, 122 N. Raymond PHONE. 924-1211
CITY: Spokane STATE• WA ZIP: 99206
December 30, 2002
r~
GNAi~JW ~ DATE
~
NO'Y'AltY
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss
COUN'I'Y OF SPOKANE )
~
SUBSCRIBEL~`~►~~ Q~N to before me this ay of )20,0
~~.•.....~1~
✓ ~i
. i
NQ~• ,
0 y
.
_ : Oulr ; NOTARY"~IGNATURE
. ~ ~ Notary Public in and for tlie State of Waslungton
~~~1'• , ~'"•''10Residin at:
~~i E0'•~...• g ~
~wA
My appointment e~pires- a10,04-
DATE SUBM7TTED RECEIVED BY v N.
AMOUNT RECEIVED ~ • Ov RECEIPT NO
EXT OF TIME APP/WTC/Rev 101001
Page 2 of 2
Application for Extension of Time
APPI,ICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
SYJIVIMERFIELD EAST; PE 1206-78
ATTACHMENT
The preliminary plat of Summerfield East was approved for development of approximately
91 acres into 268 lots for single family dwellings The developer has continually developed the
property since it was granted preliminary plat approval In 1984, "Summerfield East," consisting
of 28 lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor Also in 1984, "Summerfield East First
Addition," consisting of 53 lots was recorded with the Spokane County Auditor. In 1985,
"Sumnerfield East Second Addition," consisting of 191ots was finalized and recorded. In 1987,
"Summerfield East Third Addition," consisting of 341ots was recorded Since the last time
extension was granted on February 14, 2002, an additional phase has been finalized. The most
recent phase, "Summerfield East Fourth Addition," consisting of 251ots was recorded with the
Spokane County Auditor in October, 2002 In total, 159 of the 268 lots have been finalized.
There now rema.ins only 109 lots to final plat The developer has contracted with Wyatt
Engineering to complete the engineering and stormwater plans for the remaining phases. A
meeting with County Planning, County Engineering, and County Stormwater occurred on
December 20, 2002 to discuss the scope of the engineering requirements Engineering plans are
expected to be submitted for approval in 2003
The remaining unplatted property remains consistent with the new Growth Management
Comprehensive Plan, which designates the property as I,ow Density Residential The property is
still zoned Urban Residential-3 5 and is located within the Urban Growth Boundary
The plat sponsor respectfully requests a time extension in order to finalize the remaining
acreage of Summerfield East.
G1'I\7lipper Kert 85606\Swnmerfield 2Wttactun~nt to Extensien efl5me 2002 wpd
" SPC tNE COUNTYDIVISION BUILDING
AND CODEENFORCEMENT
ift
1026 Wcs,i• BiioADwAY Avc!vt,jE 0 SPUKA.NF VVA 99260-0050
~
5~,~+:,~ Ca-K►~.
Site Information Project Information I ~
Sitc Address: L-' AI)lliUSti lNKNOV4'N l!NK Pruject Number: 02011264 Inv: 1 lssuc I)utc: 12/'1o!U2
SPOKANE, Wf1 00000 Pertnit Use: PE-12(lf,-78 E-YT OF TIMF
Pxrccl Numher. 46353.9()74
Subdiviyiun: [JNKNOWN Applicant: f- I V1,: FI f~"IN, I.I.('
Block: Lot: 322 N UNIVLft51TY
7.oning: UNK Unkuovm SPOKANE, WA 1)1J2()r, Phone: (OA, i0i;()-cv,1
Owner: FIV(? FIFiI'. LLC' Contact: FIVE !'IFTY, LLC
322 N I.TIJIVERSITY
Address: 322 N UNIVERSI'I'Y
SPC)KA.NL'•, WA 99206 Phunc: (UO(i) 000-01100
SPOKANE, WA 99.206 Setbacka - Front: l,eft: Right: Rear:
Building Inspector: DAVE WEISBECK
Water Dist:
Gruup Namc:
Prujert Namc:
Permits
l.ung Plut C'ontnictor: License ti:
'1'IAfI' E\T1'NS1n\ 5223.00
'I'otul Pennil Fee: S_'_' ~ O0
Payment Summary
Total Fees AmuuntPaid AmountOwing Tran Datr RerKiEt # Pavment 4mt
1
Yn,resscJ Bv: ftwnc:}, h.itlileoi P E R N1 l'1
Printed By: WENI)CL, GLOItI!\ Page 1of 1
S'pokane County
Public Works Department I
Division of Building & Code Enforcement
Receipt
Receipt Nunrher: 10153 Clrstorner Number
Projects
Ful!
Proiect Nbr Inv 11r'br Fee Anrt Inv Amt Owing PAID Pmt
02011264 1 $223.00 $223.00 $223.00 $223.00 le
Total: $223.00 $223.00 $223.00 $223.00
Miscellaueous Items
Tota! PAID: $223.00
Tendcr
T
jp)e Clieck Arci Balance CC Nbr E.7 Date TENDERED
Check1 13963 223.00
Payer: FIVE FIFTY, LLC
Tutn! TENDERLD: 223.00
O►►er / (Shurt) $0.00
Chnnge $0.00
Notes:
Tran Date / Time: 12/30/02 4:24:35 PM
By: KCumming
Gugan User: gwendel
Statioa: GWENDEL
Override 8w
Pl'lllled: 12,130102 4: 24: _36 P:11 !'uge ! nj 1
' ZONING AND LAND USE FEES
,
RECEIPT INFORMATION
Date: File Number: /g Parcel No.: 4-(O 3~3 , r Q l
Name: ~L~ Phone Number: L~-~ 0 f
Company Name (if applicable):
aa ~~J
Address: L~ V~ Ae,. Ciry/state/Zip:
~
FEE 1NFORMATION
Item Item (multiplied by (equals)
# Description _ Amount # of ltems) Totnl
S
G1
,
TOTAL AMOUIYT DUE
Transaction T00 - f /;Z(,04 ~
By: Receipt
,
ZOIVING AND LAND USE FEES
RECEIPT INFORMATION
.
Date: j 2--,3Q ` Q a File Number: 120 6- V pazcel No.: Z7LG :3,5~ d 7
E~je, Name: Ft- r- L C~ Phone Number:
_ Company Name (if applicable):
Aae)t"~
- Address: ~ W
City/State/Zip:
- ~ l
/ -J
FEE INFORMATION
Item Item (multiplied by (equals)
. # Description r Amount # of Items) Total
p4o; "E! z
-3 223
,
' TOTAL AMOUNT DUE >
.
Transaction T00 -
By' Receipt ; . . ;
°
WITHERSPOOAI, KECLEY, DAVENPORT & TOOLE, P.S. STERLtNG SAVINGS BANK ~ 111 N Wall Street 13963
spokane, WA 99201-0696
1100 U.S. BANK BUILDING
422 WEST RIVERSIDE AVENUE 28-7174/3251 ,
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201-0300 (509) 6245265
PAY Two Hundred Twenty Three and 00/100 Dollars ;
NUMBER DATE AMOUNT ~
000013963 12/23/2002 ********223.00 !
VOID AFTER 6 MONTHS
TO THE Spokane Co. Planning Dept. WITHERSPOON, KELLEY, DAVENPORT & TOOLE, PS.
ORDER I ~ . A&
JP ~C
OF S~`~6 G*f
TWO SIGNATURES RECUIRED OVER $10,000
; • ~ r . ~ • • -
- ii'0 1396311' 1:3 2 5 L7 L?40i: 00 L500304 2 711'
~
FILE NO-PE-1206-78
DECLARATION OF MAILING
I, WANDA CLARK, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of Washington, do
hereby declare:
I am a citizen of the United States of America and over the age of 18 years.
On the 14"' day of February 2002, I caused to be deposited in the United States mail at
Spokane, Washington, with correct United States postage affixed, a true and correct copy of
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSTONS AND DECiSION, EXTENSION OF TIME, a copy of which is
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to those listed at the end of said decision.
Dated at Spokane, Washington, this 14'h day of February 2002.
~
WANDA CLARK
,
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) '
OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 ) FINDINGS OF FACT
SUMMERFIELD EAST, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND
PRELIMINARY PLAT AND ZONE ) DECISION
RECLASSIFICATION )
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Five Fifty, LLC, c/o Ken Tupper, has been received
and decided upon, pursuant to Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and RCVV
58.17.140.
FTNDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this decision
by the Director of the Spokane County Division of Planning.
2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 268 lots for single family
dwellings and a Zone Reciassification from Agricultural (A) to Single Family Residential (R-1).
3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on January 30,1979.
4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and west of
Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E. W.M. Spokane County, Washington.
5. The existing zoning of t11e property described in the application is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5),
previously estabiished as Agricultural (A) zoning in 1961 and re-designated to. Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) on January l, 1991 consistent with the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning
Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 tlie proposal does conform to the requirements of the existing UR-
3.5 zone.
6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and tlie location is
within the Priority Sewer Servicc Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation remains the same since
the original prelimirlary plat approval. Portions of the preliminary plat adjacent to Forker Road are
affected by the Spokane County Arterial Road Plan. Implementation of the arterial road plan will
require reservation of a Future Acquisition Area and special setbacks adjacent to Forker Road. On
August 24, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a new Spokane County
Comprehensive Plan (see Resolution #1-0799). The new Comprehensive Plan designates the subject
property as Low Density Residential. Adoption of Phase I Development regulations on January 15,
2002 did not change the zoning for the subject property and the existing Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-
3 5) zone remains effective.
7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the
expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane
County Subdivision Ordinance.
0
Section 12.100.118 states, "Tlle Director may administratively approve an extension of time provided
there are no significant changed conditions which would render the filing of the plat or binding site
plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and fiirtlier provided one or more of the
following circumstances I found to apply." 1'he following are the relevant sections of Section
12.100.118 and the Division of Planning response:
1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension
was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the
original approval;
RESPONSE: Four phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized for a total of
135 lots with 133 lots remaining to be finalized. Additional phases have not been submitted
for final plat review.
2. That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains generally
consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved, and the sponsor has
taken substantial steps towards finalizing the plat or binding site plan, which shall include one,
but is not limited to, tile following:
a. surveying the lots within the devetopment,
b. arranging for public services to the site,
c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat subdivision, short
subdivision, or binding site plan,
d. the completion of studies or other requirements, which were part of preliminary
subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval;
RESPONSE: The preliminary plat is generally consistent with the original preliminary plat,
' and the applicant has conducted engineering and geological investigation to document desired
amendments to current flood plain boundaries/designations. (See Division of Engineering
condition #19.) The applicant has also prepared engineering reports for construction of a
stormwater management system. In addition, the applicant is preparing a final plat (for 55
lots) for review by Spokane County. A"draft" revised final plat map of the Summerfield East
4"' Addition was submitted to the Division of Planning on March 22, 2001. These plans must
be accepted by Spokane County prior to finalization of any further phases.
3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was
conditioned upoii the extension of public services, which are not yet available. This provision
shall not apply to public utility extension, which the project sponsor would normally fund.
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
4. That administrative delays have caused the iiiability of the applicant to finalize the plat within
the five (5) year time period.
RESPONSE: Administrative delays in resolution of the current flood plain boundaries and
designation have prevented finalization of the remai»ing portions of the preliminary plat.
8. Additional conditions have been recommended by reviewing agencies and departments, including the
Spokane County Division of Engineering.
9. This is the tenth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has been
approximately 22 years.
10. The following facts are also relevant.
a. Section 12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance states "the Director may
grant one three (3) year time extension that inay include any additional or altered conditions
and requirements recommended by affected agencies. Additional one (1) year time eYtensions
may be granted by the Director beyond the initial three (3) year extension. Based on the
above, the applicant is advised that future time eatensions may only be granted upon
demonstration of compliance with the extension criteria identified by Section 12.100.118 and
for one (l) year increments.
1 l. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with Section
12.100.18 of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time.
PE-1206-78 Summerfield East, Extension ofTime
Page 2 of 10
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for application
PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 is hereby APPROVED until February 1, 2003 and subject to those conditions
specified by Division of Planning Findings of Fact, Conclusion and Decision dated January 1], 1996, updated
as follows: New conditions are illustrated in bold text and revised conditions are illustrated as-stFike, thr-e41
or underlines.
CONDITTONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLA,NNING (UPDATED)
~ 1.) Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial compliance with
~ Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance.
I., The preliminary plat is given a time extension for one (1) year, specifically to February 1, 2003. The
applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request at least thirty (30) days
prior to the above expiration date.
3The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record.
`4„ The preliminary subdivision shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as amended.
~ The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of record. No
increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition application submittal
and approval.
The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance with these
Findings and Conditions of Approval.
A final plat name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be approved by
the Planning Director/designee.
"8- Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
~ The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all private or
public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statenlent:
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the tirne building permits are requested unless
. these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. Tlle setbacks indicated on this plat may be
varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained."
'10,- Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat. Written approval
of utility easements by appropriate utiility companies shall be received with the submittal of the final
plat.
-lk Four (4) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Division of Planning prior to filing the
final plat.
-13` Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor sliall submit one or more
maps outlined in red of the area being finalized The scale shall match the appropriate assessor's map
scale.
1, The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County Auditor a Title
Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. 1 he reserved
future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in part, by the Planning Department.
The notice should be recorded within the same time frame as an appeal and shall provicie the
following:
a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in
addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along Forker Road.
PE-1206-78 Summerfield Cast, Extension ofTime
Pagc 3 of 10
b. FLrture building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be
measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be located
within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of the above
improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the applicant's expense
when roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used as
allowed in the zone, except that any irnprovements (such as landscaping, parking, surface
drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses.
15, The plat dedication shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub road or
temporary cul-de-sac:
"Lot(s) [ ] , Block(s) are located on a temporary cul-de-sac/stub road. This temporary cul-de-
sac/stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing
roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs dictate."
` A;q; The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-do-sac lots, which meet or exceed the
minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat.
4~. .
. , appr-effiate Ar-P. PFOWGti9l; EkStFiGt, a
. , ,
b • 1
• b efFier'
4-E .
y
b
' The b b
~
65'stem-:
19.
„
,
> > Gount3i b
, , I
"
2-0. N b _
n
n
, 5 • ,
n u
SysteN'
s-i . b
) l
~ b
weti-a're.
T~~, A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat.
2-2. Subse"ent extensien ef timp. will Only be, ransidei;ed tipen a finding of subst.a.sit-i-al a-em.pliaflGe W47h
CliaptoF !4, , > >
PE-1206-78 Summerfield Last, Ex[ension of Tune ,
Paae 4 of 10
18. That the sponsor constructs a 6 foot chainlink fcnce around the entire periphery of the retainage basin
in the storm drainagc plan.
19. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control ALrthority to
insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques.
20. That the sponsor limits the construction activities from 7:00 a.rn. to 6:00 p.m.
21. That the sponsor provides and constructs 6-foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to those
required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress Road, and
Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
22. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet common lot line
shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any f nalizing of any phase of
this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West Farms Irrigatcd Tracts Plat #4, Blocks
113 and 112.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS
Prior to release of a building permit or use of property as proposed:
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication of rightof-
way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of record.
2. Plans, b
b
; Fead pkans t-n- be-pFopaFed undeer the, d_;rn_r_AieR of a liGORS30--cl RF-Qf4G r,
Eh}gi-R~~
Z
b .
4. . b• , b , b
pTCrrTs, b b
'S aGG8PtaRGG PF*E)r- W F01-a-s-~4 -_Gn-s Gtion oF building pp.Fmit,
tiio-land-natiQm:
2. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conf'orm to the 2001 Spokane County
Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the current edition of the Spokane County
Guiclelines for Stormwater Management, and all otlier applicable standards. The plans and
report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a construction or
building permit or approval of the final plat.
3. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct
supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer with "As Built"
plans and a certificate in tivriting that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on
the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced.
4. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed Public rightof-way until a
permit has been issued by the Couiity Engineer. All work is subject to inspection and approval by the
County Engineer.
PE-1206-78 Summerfield Cast, Gxtension of'1'ime
I'agc 5 of 10
5. All construction within the existing or proposed Public rightof-way is to be completed prior to filing
the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to co-ver the cost of
construction of improvements. Construction certification, "As Built" plans and monumenting the street
centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer.
6. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to County standards
and established as county roads.
7. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one-half (1/2) rights-of-way and stub road
connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant.
8. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County Board of
Commissioners Resolution No. 89-1592 1-0298, as amended, which establishes regulations for roads,
approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
9. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellington
Avenue, Forker Road and Progress Road.
10. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right of-way along Progress Road is required.
ll. That the sponsor allocate and redesign nortll access road intersection at Progress Road. Design
standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used
12. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
13. That tlle sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb abng pathway routes as
designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley
Avenue.
14. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103 and south line
of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
15. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should flooding, causcd
througli activities of the plat, cause damage to the road.
16. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the Spokane
County Engineers.
17. There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to evaluate the
impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released FEMA maps arri
reports Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to finalization of any further phases.
22 1- • b
, :n#iM
~
w'
pact*
18. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certifcation portion of the project shall be posted
with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance.
PC-1206-78 Summerfield East, Extension ofTune
Page 6 of 10
, GeFtified and nE)n-aGG@PtGd phaSe Of thO 01--r- nt may be-
allowed and ne plaiis will be d by Spek.-ane, CA-unt), fGF GE)ASAFUG-AiGA Liniess the pr.*GF PhARG
mpleted anc-I v.ertilAed by the Sponsor-'
24• Adogtiate b , b ,
b ,
• b b
> >
0
6ve
GGUFSO.
19. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Finding of Fact and Conclusions for PE 1206-78, Sumerfield
East are hereby antended as follows:
a. Within the development all lots shall be required to have site plan showing lowest adjacent
grade and lowest opening at least 2 feet above curb elevation for resiclence and concrete
garage slab at lease 18 inches above curb elevation. leAlvest
> >
b. Each lot will require a floodplain development permit prior to any development (to
include grading, filling, excavating, paving, construction and other development
activities).
c. Plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting
homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain.
d. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A
Floodplain without a CLOMR.
p r
~7 . 7
Develepwient. I , b , o --ating~
lopment
J
f. S_raling ,
b
F. b a , ~"b
b
b '
k. R-e Z b
'
the
b b b ,
Without b f9F, iiid b ~
20. The County Engineer has examined this development proposal and has cietermined that tlle
impact of this proposal upon the existing County Road System rvarrants the dedication of
additional Right of Way and the roadway improvements herein specified.
21. "The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead effecting
the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition.
Spokane County `vill assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding
PL-1206-78 Summertield East, Gxtension of`I'ime
Pagc 7 of 10
these utilities." "The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for
adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary worlc."
22. Erosion Control: A Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control (TESC) plan shall be
prepared by a WA State licensed Professional Engineer and implemented throughout the
duration of construction. The TESC plan is to be prepared using best management practices
(BMP's) currently acceptecl within the Civil Engineering profession. Ttie TESC plan is to
include, at a minimum, a grading plan, location and cletails of silt control structures, anci street
cleaning program. Runoff from exposed areas shall be fiitered prior to ciischarging into a
detention pond, swale, infiltration facility, or natural drainageway. The TESC plan is to be
included in the road and drainage plans. The applicant's Engineer is to submit the TESC plan
and supporting calculations to Spolcane County prior to site disturbance. The TESC major
structures (such as silt ponds, silt traps) are to be installed prior to other site work and the
TESC measures are to be implemented and maintained throughout the cluration of construction,
inclucling house construction.
23. Any part of the drainage system that lies outside of the public right-of-way will neither bc
maintained nor operated by Spokane County forces. Prior to plan acceptance by the County
Engineer, the Sponsor shall provide a mechanism, acceptable to the County Enginecr, for the
perpetual maintenance of the stormwater drainage system. This mechanism shall also provide
for the funding of routine maintenance and the replacement of the various components of the
drainage system at the end of the service life of the respective components, and any other
improvements that may be legally required in the future. An Operations and Maintenance
Manual for the stormwater management system shall be prepared by the Sponsor's Engineer,
and included in the project documents submitted to the County Engineer for acceptance, along
with a discussion of the design life of the various components, a calculated annual cost for repair
and maintenance, and a calculated replacement cost. Homeowners Associations are accepted by
the Spokane County Engineer for carrying out the required maintenance functions and
responsibilities.
24. Appropriate provision shall be made that the following described property be held in trust until the
continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A one ( l}foot strip at the ends or edges of all streets
that terminate or border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul-de-sacs are required when streets terminate
at the plat boundaries of the final plat.)
25. Individual driveway access permits are required prior to issuance of a building permit for driveway
approaches to the county road system.
26. All publie roads within the plat shall be designed and constructed to Spokane County standards.
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
1. The final p(at shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any attaclied
sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record for
distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County Engineer and the
Spokane Regional Health District. Written approval of the easements by the utility companies must be
received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
5 Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by tlie Regional Engineer
(Spokane), State Department of Health.
PE-1206-7& Summerticld EASt, Extension ofTime
Page 8 of 10
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shaU demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane County
Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, tlie sponsor shall present evidence fihat the plat lies within the recorded
service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire protection use
shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been approved by the fire
protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier
(purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of
said water plan that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy
their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for
reproduction.
9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that appropriate
contractual arrangemeilts have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system,
in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case,
for completion of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to
application for building permrts within the plat.
The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of Spokane,
Spokane Regional Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot/tract purchaser
refused a building permit due fio failure of the plat sponsoi- to satisfactorily complete the approved
water system.
10. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall decnonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane Regional
Health District that suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal systems are available on all lots within
the approved preliminary plat not already finalized.
l l. Subject to specific application approval and issuance ofpermits by the health officer, the use of
individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state:
"Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of
on-site sewage systems may be authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state:
"Use of private wells and water systems is prohibited."
14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that:
"The public water system, as approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district
and purveyor, will be installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual
domestic water service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot."
SPOKANE COUNTY DMSION OF UTILITIES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Comm issioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of orr site sewer
disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on compliaiice with all rules
and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to
specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System
Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future area wicle collection
systems.
PI:-1206-78 Summerfield Cast, Extension of Timc
1'agc 9 of 10
-
~
DATED THIS DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2002
~A
n Pederson, Senior Planner ~
Pursuant to ESH13-1724 and Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 1-0700, this document is
also considered the NOTICE OF DECISION. Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to
appeal this decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing
will be scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee
payable to the Spokane County Division of Planning; within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this
decision is signed.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 477-7200.
c: Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads, Scott Engelhard
Spokane County Division of Engineering & Roads, John Hohman
Spokane County Division of Utilities, Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims
Spohane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
Ken Tupper, Five Fifty, LLC, 322 N. University Rd., Spokane, W A 99206
CLC Associates, 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, VVA 99204
PE-1206-78 Summcrfield East, Extcnsion of Time
I'age 10 of 10
~
• " SPnh 4E COUNTY DIVISION 4 31JILDING
, .
_kND CODEENFORCEMENT
I026 WES'C BROADWAl• AvE!vuc • Sj~~Kt.-m~ VYA 99260-0050
;
~ SrXW~LCAVsUn.
Site Information Project Information I
Site Addrrss: U N ADDRESS UNKNOWN [JNK Pmject Nttmbe (ll lt1C,1) Inv: 1 Issue Date:
sPoKANt;, wA 00000 permic Use: PL-12o6-7g Ex'r oF TIIvtc (200 > ~
Parccl Number. 46354.9050
Subdivision: IJNKNOWN Applicant: KEN Tt1PPI:It =
Blork: LoL 322 N UMVE1tS(T~' ~
.
Zuning: C1NK Un}:novm SPOKANF.. WA 99206 Phone: (509> 981-4335
•
Qwnrr: PI VE FIFTY, LLC Cuntact:
4ddresc: 322 N [INIVERSITY Phone:
SPOICANE, PIA 99206
Setbacks - Front: L,eft: Right: ReAr:
I3uilcliag Inspector: BARRY FCtJSFLC)EN
Water Dist:
Group Name:
I Pruject Name:
Permits
- - - -
l,~,n,~~ P~ul ('ontructor. Liccnse
TIntE E1TTNstoN S217.00
Total Permit Fee: S217.00
Payment Summary
Tutal Fees AmountPaid AmauntOn•ine Tran Date Receipt # Payment Amt
$217cx) 1? 0t, S« 0u 12r7M t 10089 $217.00
Processea By: 13uck, Marti MILLWOOD
Printed By: WENDEL, GLORIII Pa#;e 1 of 1
Spokane County
Public Works Department
Division of Building & Code Enforcement
Receipt
Receipt Nunrber: 10089 Customer Numher
Projects
Fu!!
Pro#ect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Ant1 In v Anrt Owinp, PAID Pmt
01011060 1 $217.00 $217.00 $217.00 $217.00 ~
1,-1 , ,
lliscE•ltaneuus lteuis
Tutal PAID: $217.00
Tender
ype Check Acet BalaRCe CCNhr F.._pr Da1e ?'ENDERED
T
Check1 1112 217.00
Payer: KENNETH J. TUPPER
Tota! TENDERED: 217.00
Over / (Sltorl) $0.00
Change $0.00
Notes:
Tran Dute / Tinre: 12/27/01 2:55:45 PM
By: GWendel
Logo,e User: gwende)
Station: GWENDEL
Overrlde By:
Printed: 1212 7i01 2: SS: 46 P.M1! PnXe 1 vj 1
,
MMM
ZONING AND LAND USE FEES
' RECEIPT INFORMATION
.
; .
Date: File Number: i Parcel No.:
~.r
~
Namo: ~ fu Phone Number:
_ ~ .
Company Name (if applicable): ,
,
Address: City/StatelZip:
. i
FEE INFORMATION
Item Item (multiplied by (equals) ~
# Descriptivn Amount # of Items) Tota]
$ ~ .
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE
- , Transaction T00 - 1 I 0
gy; Receipt '
~
.
. ~
I 1" ~1
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
DNISION OF PLANNING A DIVISTON OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
MICHAEL V NEEDHAM, DIRECCOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads, Transportation
Engineering, Scott Engelhard c/o Sandy Kimball
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Information Management, Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims
Spokane County Division of Building & Code Enforcement, Jeff Forry
Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Parks & Recreation, Steve Horobiowski
Spokane County Fire Protection District No 1
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District No. 361
FROM: John Pederson, Senior Planner
DATE: December 28, 2001
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PE-1206-78; SUNIlVIERFIELD EAST
The Spokane County Division of Planning has received the attached request for an Extension of
Time for tlle above-subject preliminary plat.
Please provide any comments or recommended conditions by January 11, 2002. If you have any
questions, you may contact me at 477-7212.
wc
Enclosure: Application for Extension of Time
c: Ken Tupper, 122 N. Raymond, Spokane, WA 99206
CLC Associates, 707 W. 7th Ave., Ste. 200, Spokane, WA 99204
1026 W BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE (509) 477-7200 • FAX• (509) 477-2243 • TDD (509) 477-7133
C4
RECE IVED
~
' SPOKANE COUNTY
AIP
. ~
.
2001
:o .
: :'50TN0Y~ ~N~0,P, Tr;1jM,,0-':,D1V1S10N Oi I~LAIVNIIV
il.~." , ~ ~
DIVISION OF PLANNING
SPOK:ANE C0=
NAME OF PLAT/FILE NO: PE 1206-78
PARCEL NO.. 4635~ 9050; 77'a ~`~92;
APPLICANT (NAME OF LEGAL OWNER): FIVE FIFTY, LLC
MAILING ADDRESS: 122 North Ravmond
CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99206
PHONE: (work) 217- i 05 2 (home) (fax) 9 24-1211
IF APPLICANT IS NOT THE OWNER, INCLUDE WRITTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FOR
THE BELOW OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT TO SERVE AS REPRESENTATIVE
OWNER'S DESIGNATED CONTACT: KENNETH J. TUPPER
MAILING ADDRESS: 222 North Raymond
CITY: Suokane STATE: WA ZIP: 992Q6
PHONE: (work) 217-105 2 (home) (fax) 9 24-1211
1. Has any portion of the plat, short plat or BSP been fmalized (recorded)?
Xes.
2. Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Planning?
Yes X No If no, why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized?
What has been the delay? Please see attached
3. What progress has occurred: What conditions of approval have been completed (such as survey work,
improvements constructed, departmental approvals obtained)?
PleaGe Gee attached
Page 1 of 2
Application for Extension oi Time
4. Why has the plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized? What has delayed finalization?
Please $ee attacheO .
5. Is this a phased project? Yes X No If yes, please complete the following information:
No. of lots originally approved: 266 No. of phases finalized to date: 4
No. of lots remaining to be finalized: 133 No. of acres remaining to date: 45
LEGAL OWNER SIGNATURE
(Signature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
I, KENNETH J. TUPPER (print name) SWEAR QR f1FFIRM THAT
THE ABOVE RESPONSES aRE MADE TRUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF T'HE AREA
PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER,
ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
AC'Y'IONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF.
ADDRESS: 122 North Raymond PHONE: 217-1052
CITY: Spokane STATE: WA ZIP: 99206
~ rA" DATE
,
1VOTARY
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me thisc>l-m day o , 200 /
NOT;`R~ ~
`N NOTARY SIGNATURE
`~0~.•• ~T v
~
.N~tA~ % Notary Public in and f r the State of Washington
Residing at:
iNi1 ; • ~ ~
i ~ •
i9~'•. • ~
~~~ij~ O~c AS~► My appointment expires: '12o-~
,
1111111~~~~ .
DATE SUBMITTED: RECEIVED BY WlMWL-
AMOUNT RECENED RECEIIrT N0.
EXT OF TIME APP/WTC/Rev. 101001
Page 2 af 2
AppiicaOon for Extension of Time
APPLICATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
SITMMERFIELD EAST; PE 1206-78
ATTACHMENT
Four phases of the Summerfield East plat have been finalized into 13 S lots. Fina.lization of
the remaining 133 lots on 45 acres have been delayed due to difficulties in obtaining approval of the
storm water management systems to handle off site drainage on to the site from Forker draw. In the
past six years, the developer has engaged in engineering and geological investigations of the Forker
draw watershed culminating in a"Geology Report of the Forker Draw Watershed" which was
submitted to Spokane County and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). In
addition, several engineering and design reports for construction of a storm water system capable of
handling 100 year floor events have been produced and submitted for review by Spokane County.
Also, working in conjunction with Spokane County, Developer has sought changes in FEMA's
designation of Forker draw as a"alluvial fan" and also sought changes in the 100 year flood plain
boundary.
The resolution of storm water issues for this plat is complicated and difficult involving not
only the concurrence of Spokane County but coordination with FEMA. As noted above, the
Developer had diligently pursued all various design options and has produced original research and
report on the Forker draw watershed.
In the past 3 years the developer has completed mapping and an evaluation report regarding
the flood zone as it affects their plat and obtained the concurrence of Spokane County as to its
location. We are informed that Spokane County is in the process of completing a Stormwater study
of the Forker Draw. Spokane County's study together with information provides by the Developer
should resolve stormwater and flood plain issues for the Summerfield property.
In 1999, the Developer engaged Inland Pacific Engineering ("IPEC") to prepare a final plat
for 641ots on 21 acres. Drawings and studies for the final plat were prepared for review by Spokane
County Utilities and Engineering Department. These drawings are studies which include a
Topographic Survey, Septic Tank/Drainfield Investigation, Road and Drainage Plans, Water and
Sewer System Plans, and Final Plat layout. The Developer has submitted all documents and
drawings necessary for final plat approval for 25 lots and awaits final plat approval by Spokane
County. -
The Developer requests a three (3) year extension of time.
~~~ENED
SPOKANE CO~~~
E7, F p ' 2001
G\'RTupper Ken 856061SummafieldlAttachment to Exunsion of Time.wpd
DDVISION 0F PL.ANN1NG
ZONING AND LAND USE FEES
-'k RECEIPT INFORMATION ~
Date: H'ile Number: ~ '"I Parcel No.:
Name: 4q Ve" Phone Number.
V 1
Company Name (if applicable):
Address: ~ • ~ City/State/Zip: OC"lWLD _
, U
FEE INFORMATION
,
Item Item (multiplied by (equals)
# Description Amount # of Items) Total
$ O
~ n~ ~
V
, TOTAL AMOUNT DUE ~ $,2 ✓ v C)
~
Transaction T00 -
gy. Receipt
KENNETH J TUPPER 1112
SHARON L TUPPER
322 N UNIVERSfTY (509)981-0335 28-7174/3251
~26
SPOKANE, WA 38206
PaY '1'0 'T'f tE
OxDER Or ~ -_-__-=----7
~ Dcat.t.ni;s
i
STERLING ANYTIME LJNE
SAVINGS BANK 1.888-678-78W I
Privrb Bmnkinp
1I I N Wall St ~
Spoliarn, WA 99201
FOtt
1:325L?L7~,01: 59990?5232Lii' LL2
L
\-4r
~
- . • <
FILE NO. PE-1206-78
DECLARATION OF MAILING
I, HEATHER DRESSOR, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of
Washington, do hereby declare:
I am a citizen of the United States of America and over the age of 18 years.
On the 21 S` day of January, 1999, I caused to be deposited in the United States mail at
Spokane, Washington, with correct United States postage affixed, a true and correct copy of
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS & DEC1S10N (TIME EXTENSION), a copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to those listed at end of said decision.
Dated at Spokane, Washington, this 21 S' day of January, 1999.
HEATHER DRES S OR
HD-DECLARATION 0F IvII..G MSTR
.
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION )
OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE-1206-78/ ) FINDINGS OF FACT
ZE-202-78; SUMMERFIELD EAST, ) CONCLUSIONS AND
AN APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLAT ) DECISION
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Kenneth Tupper has been received and
decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance Section 12.100.118 and RCW
58.17.140.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering
this decision by the Spokane County Division of Building & Planning Director.
2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 2681ots for single
family dwellings and a zone reclassification from Agriculture (A) to Single Family
Residential (R-1).
3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on
January 30, 1979.
4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and
west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44EWM, Spokane
County, Washington.
5. The existing zoning of the property described in the application is Urban Residenrial-3.5
(LJR-3.5) previously established as Agriculture (A) zoning in 1961 and redesignated to
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. Pursuant to RCW 58.17.195 the proposal
does conform to the requirements of the existing UR-3.5 zone.
6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the
location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation
remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Portions of the
preliminary plat adjacent to Forker Road are affected by the Spokane County Arterial
Road Plan. Implementation of the arterial road plan will require reservation of a Future
Acquisition Area and special setbacks adjacent to Forker Road.
7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for
the expiration of preliminary subdivisions. These criteria are found in Section
12.100.118 of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance (effective 1/1 /97).
Section 12.100.118 states, "The Director may administrative approve an extension of
time provided there are no significant changed conditions which would render the filing
of the plat or binding site plan contrary to the public health, safety or general welfare, and
r"
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 Page 2
further provided one or more of the following circumstances is found to apply." The
following are the relevant sections of Section 12.100.118 and the Division of Building &
Planning response.
1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the
project was approved and the remaining lots would form a unified development
consistent with the original approval;
RESPONSE: Four (4) phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized
for a total of 135 lots. 1331ots remain to be finalized. No phases have been
finalized subsequent to the previous extension of time.
2. That the preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan remains
generally consistent with the original plat or binding site plan that was approved,
and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing the plat or binding
site plan, which shall include one, but is not limited to, the following:
a. surveying the lots within the development,
b. arranging for public services to the site,
c. obtaining necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary
subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan,
d. the completion of studies or other requirements which were part of
preliminary subdivision, short subdivision, or binding site plan approval;
RESPONSE: The preliminary plat is generally consistent with the original
preliminary plat, and the applicant has conducted engineering and geological
investigation to document desired amendments to current flood plain
boundaries/designations. Completion of engineering work to evaluate stormwater
runoff from the Forker Draw is a specific requirementlcondition imposed on the
preliminary plat (see Spokane County Division of Engineering Condition No. 18).
The applicant has also prepared engineering reports for construction of a stormwater
management system. In addition, the applicant is preparing a final plat (for 55 lots)
for review by Spokane County. These plans must be accepted by Spokane County
prior to finalization of any further phases.
3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was
conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This
provision shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would
normally fund.
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
4. That administrative delays have caused the inability of the applicant to finalize the
plat within the five (5) year time period.
RESPONSE: Administrative delays in resolution of the current flood plain
boundaries and designation have prevented finalization of the remaining portions of
the preliminary plat.
8. Additional conditions have been recommended by reviewing agencies and departments,
including the Spokane County Division of Utilities, Spokane County Division of
Stormwater Utility and the Spokane County Division of Engineering.
r-
• _
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 Page 3
9. This is the ninth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has
been approximately 20 years.
10. The following facts are also relevant.
a. This extension of time is the first extension request to be processed under the
Spokane County Subdivision ordinance adopted on December 17, 1996 and
effective on January 1, 1997. Section 12.100.118 of said ordinance states that "the
Director may grant one thxee (3) year time extension that may include any
additional or altered conditions and requirements recommended by affected
agencies. Additional one (1) year time extensions may be granted by the Director
beyond the initial three (3) year extension. Based on the above, the applicant is
advised that future time extensions may only be granted upon demonstration of
compliance with the extension criteria identified by Section 12.100.118 and for one
(1) year increments.
11. The applicant/owner should show substantially greater progress toward complying with
Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an
additional extension of time.
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for
application PE-1206-78/ZE-2-278 is hereby APPROVED until February l, 2002 and subject to
those conditions specified by Findings of Fact, Conclusions & Decision dated January 11, 1996
together with the following updated conditions.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING (UPDATED)
1. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial
compliance with Section 12.100.118, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance.
2. The preliminary plat is given a time extension for three (3) years, specifically to February
21, 2002. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request
approximately thirty (30) days prior to the above expiration date.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING AND ROADS (UPDATED)
Prior To Issuance Of A Buildinia Permit Or Use Of The Propertv As Proposed:
1. A Professional Engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, shall submit final road and
drainage plans, a drainage report and calculations that conform to all current standards
and laws governing stormwater management in Spokane County. Final drainage plans
and a drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of a
construction or building permit, or approval of the land action.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 Page 4
2. The stormwater management systems and roads for this plat shall be constructed and
certified to be constructed in accordance with the accepted road and drainage plans, or all
the required improvements must be bonded for in accordance with Spokane County
regulations, prior to the recording of the final plat. Record drawings and all construction
documentation shall be submitted with the proper certification statement.
3. A bond for the anticipated engineering inspection and certification portion of the project
sha11 be posted with the County Engineer prior to plan acceptance.
4. If the project is phased and one phase depends on another phase for access and/or
drainage treatment and disposal, the prior phase shall be completed and certified prior to
the submittal of plans for the dependent phase of the development. One foot no access
strips on public roads will not be released until the subject phase is completed, certified
and accepted by Spokane County for maintenance. No access through a non certified and
non-accepted phase of the development may be allowed and no plans will be accepted by
Spokane County for construction unless the prior phase is completed and certified by the
Sponsor's Engineer.
5. Adequate drainage easements, granted to Spokane County and/or an acceptable
maintenance entity, must be provided for all elements of the drainage plan, in order that
proper maintenance may be performed. Easements for drainage ditches and natural
drainage channels shall be wide enough to contain within the easement the runoff from a
50 year, 24 hour storm event for the contributing basin, plus a 30% freeboard. The
easement shall also include an adequate maintenance access for the drainage course.
6. Condition No. 18 in Spokane County's Findings of Fact and Conclusions for PE-1206-
78, Summerfield East are hereby amended as follows:
a. Within the development all lowest floors, including basement floors shall be at or
above elevation 2036, as this floodplain has been delineated as an alluvial fan, the
structures shall be constructed to withstand any expected debris flow.
b. All lots created must have a suitable building area outside the limits of the Zone A
floodplain.
c. Development shall only occur within the Zone B without further floodplain analysis.
Development includes, but is not limited to buildings or other structures, grading,
excavating, filling, paving. Floodplain Development Permits shall be obtained for all
development partially or wholly within the Zones A or B.
d. Scaling off the map is not acceptable, surveyed elevations shall be used to delineate
the floodplain boundary. The east flank of the floodplain must be defined by
engineering analysis if it is intended that development will occur in this are.
e. The plat shall contain language identifying the area as a flood hazard area, alerting
homeowners of the requirements for developing within the floodplain.
f. Roads may not be constructed within the Zone A without further information being
supplied to the engineer's Office to show safe ingress and egress during a 100 year
event, and no impact to the floodplain due to road development.
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 Page 5
g. No further plat encroachment or finalization of phases may occur within the Zone A
Floodplain without applying for, obtaining and completing the requirements for a
Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES (UPDATED)
1. The current Guidelines for Stormwater Management need to be met.
T THI DAY OF JANUARY 1999.
DA ED S ~ ,
~
W. PEDER9ON
nior Planner
Pursuant to ESHB-1724 and Spokane Board of County Commissioners resolution 96-0293, this document is aiso
considered the NOTICE OF DECISION. Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this
decision to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be scheduled.
To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing fee payable to the Spokane
County Division of Building & Planning, within fourteen (14) calendar days from the date this decision is signed.
If you have any questions, please call the Division of Building & Planning at 477-3675.
c: Division of Engineering
Division of Utilities
Regional Health District
Kenneth Tupper, Sponsor
inland Pacific Engineering Co., Surveyor
\
A
I
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
_ , .
BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAvtES L. MANSON, C.B.O, DrxECroR DEtvtvrs M. ScOTr, P.E., DrRECTOx
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads; Pat Harper c/o
Sandy Kimball
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane County Parks, Recreation & Fair; Steve Horobiowski
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane County Division of Buildings; Jeff Forry
Long Range Planning Division; John Mercer
Fire Protection District 1
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District No. 361
FROM: John W. Pederson
Senior Planner
J
DATE: December 11, 1998
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE-1206-78; SUMMERFIELD EAST
The Spokane County Division of Building & Planning has received the attached request
for an Extension of Time to finalize the above-referenced preliminary plat.
If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should
be made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to me by
December 28, 1998.
Thank you.
c: Kenneth Tupper, Owner/Applicant
Inland Pacific Engineering Co./Surveyor
Enclosure
ZOZC WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
PHOrrE. (509) 456-3675 • FAx (509) 456-4703
TDD: (509) 324-3166
l
. ,
` • _
SPOKANE CC3t1NTY DYVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING
EXTENS1ON OF TIME APPLZCATION
I'ILE NO.: PE 1206-78 NO. OF LOTS• 266
p«,per Kenneth J. Tupper
Acidress E. 12929 Sprague Avenue
City, State, Zip. Spokdne, WA 99212
~ Phone (509) 928-1991 Fax
Appiicant/Sponsor , Same as above
Address
City, State, Lip
j'hone F ax
Surveyor Inl and Paci fi c Enqi neeri nq
707 W. 7th, Ste 200
Address:
C►ty, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99204
Phane (509) 458-6840 Fax:
1 Has any partion of the plat, short plat or BSP been finalized? (Recorded with the Auditor)
yes
? Has a proposed final plat, short plat or BSP been submitted to the Division of Building and Planninn?
l'es X ?vo lf no, why has thc plat, short plat or BSP not been finalized?
~ What progress has occurred') What condit►ons of approval have been completed (such as survey work,
imprnvements constructed, depanmental approva!s obtained)'?
See attached
4 is this a phased proicci" N'es X No Ii yes' p?ease comoiete th%e failoNving ini'ormatioii
Nio of lors originallv approved 266 Nl0. of phases fic}aiized to date 4
No of lots remaininb to be finalized• 133 45
No of acres remainina to date
nATJ_- SIGNATU'E OF O T-lZ I
nLEASF SUB1v1IT THIS FORM ALONG WITFI TNE REQUIRED T1ME EXZ'ENSION FrE -TQ TI_1E
DiVISJON OF BUILDI`'G AhFU PLATINING
STA_rF.ONL'
~ . ' 'i's i•'~ o.~ ' SS~+~ aLi ~!`~..A':~ :5'~~ti ik~'• 3',~aq~y ~ ~ •Sf~"~I ~•~a 1h1C~,yJ'H N '+...~'•i ~ te„e yy ,s~: _ ,7 y, 74s + ,
o'sw'`i
s'eW'iq- 1~fi,+ ~r~•sArtsp' t~'n'x'~~xJr~r T-~., ~ i~~ ~l'r Y.7iw~.~a
tt~~~~a'~ ti~ W-W D:1T SUBMI'iTED. , GLY D
f t4 ~ • ~../~i~,~t"' ' • ~ ` SCs+ :?;t3y~ .SY , ,f.
• ' Y ~ ~ r ~ , ~ •~l:T~ :at{'
• . ~ °'3?~ . , ~ • t?.1iM~~a`!~','l"6..~-~~r~i~_::~•,'~~~1 i•,~i. i~~4'LLZ....;i:~^~.d~t_1,s:4'~:',~"'s~o~~4'~t ~ytiti.r . . a+<~'1 ;J.," '
i.a r oF ME aLQ.Msn19;
1
~
/
♦ ~ t f ~ ~
ATTACHMENT TO EXTENSION OF TIME FORIVI
Four phases of the Summerfield East plat have been finalized into 135 lots. Finalization of
the remaining 133 lots on 45 acres have been delayed due to difficulties in obtaining approval of the
storm water management systems to handle off site drainage on to the site from Forker draw. In the
past six years, the developer has engaged in engineering and geological investigations of the Forker
draw watershed culminating in a"Geology Report of the Forker Draw Watershed" which was
submitted to Spokane County and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). In
' addition, several engineering and design reports for construction of a storm water system capable
Y of handling 100 year floor events have been produced and submitted for review by Spokane County.
Also, working in conjunction with Spokane County, Developer has sought changes in FEMA's
designation of Forker draw as a"alluvial fan" and also sought changes in the 100 year flood plain
boundary.
The resolution of storm water issues for tilus plat is compliCuted ard diiLficult involvzng not
only the concurrence of Spokane County but coordination with FE1V1A. As noted above, the
Developer had diligently pursued all various design options and has produced original research and
report on the Forker draw watershed.
In the past 3 years the developer has completed mapping and an evaluation report regarding
the flood zone as it affects their plat and obtained the concurrence of Spokane County as to its
location. The Developer has also engaged Inland Pacific Engineering ("IPEC") to prepare a final
plat for SS lots on 23 acres. IPEC has initiated drawings and studies for the final plat for review by
Spokane County Utilities and Engineering Department. These drawings are studies which include
a Topographic Survey, Septic Tan.klDrainfield Investigation, Road and Drainage Plans, Water and
Sewer System Plans, and Final Plat layout. The Developer has been inforrned that IPEC and
Spokane County will be unable to complete and approve the Final Plat prior to the expiration of the
approval for the preliminary plat (February l, 1997).
G \DOC1xSRS\TUPPERIEXTENS DOC
/
Z.ONING AND LAND USE FEES
RECEIPT INFORMATION y
~
Date: File Number: 7,T
Name: 47 Phone Number: .
lelA
Company Name (if applicable): .
Address: e7 ~ tieze CitylStatelZip:
FEE TiVFORNIATION
Item Item (muiciplied (cquals)
n Description Amount b!') Total
# of Items
U~ ~
TOTAL AiY10UNT DUE r W-3-411
Transaction T97-
gy: Receipt ~
.
{.i[I Rf 'liL1Jv7
i
i
~ - . .
~
~
Spokune Co unty
Public Works Department
Divison of Building & Plannitzg Receipt
Receipt Number: 13934 Custonrer Nun:ber
Projects
Miscellaneous Items
Code DescriQtiun Q1Y Price Anrouttt Tux PAID
ZZP0020 TIME EXTENSIO 1 203.000/ NUMBER 203.00 0.00 203.00
Comment: PE-1206-78 - KENNETH TUPPER,
12929 E. SPRAGUE AVE, SPOKANE,
WA 99216 - ~ • ' . •
- ~ Total,s: ' ~ ~ • :203,00 0.00 203.00
. . . , , . ~ . . , , Total PAID: $203.00
Tender .
~e Clrec~k Arct $nlance' CC Nbr ,Er Date TENDERED
Check1 1401 203.00
Tota! TENDERED: 203.00
Over / (Sliort) $0.00
C/iange $0.00
Notes:
Tran yale / Tlme: 12/11 /98 1:07:05 PM
By: GWendel
Logon User: gwendel - Statiorr: GWENDEL
Overrlde By: , : , : . .
Printed: 12/11/981:07:23PA! Page 1 ojl
r~ S P O K A N E C O U' N T Y
DfiPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND PLANNING • A DNISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
JAMES L MANSON, C.B O, DIRECTOI2 DENNIS M SCOTT, P E, DIRECTOR
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering and Roads
Spokane County Division of Utilities
Spokane County Health District
Spokane County Division of Buildings
Spokane County Parks Department
Fire Protection District No. 1
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District
FROM. John Pederson, Senlor Planner
DAT'E: December 1, 1995 „
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE-1206-78 SUMMERFIELD EAST
The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an Extension
of Time to finalize the plat of PE-1206-78 SUNIlVERFIELD EAST.
If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be
made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to John Pederson
by December 15, 1995.
Thank you.
c: Ken Tupper, 12929 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Enclosure
1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
Butt.DcNG PxoNE (509) 456-3675 • FAx (509) 456-4703
PLANNING PHONE (509) 456-2205 • FAx (509) 456-2243
TDD (509) 324-3166
~ y
NOTICE OF TIME EXTENSION REQUEST
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by Spokane County that the owner of the
preliminary subdivision known as Summerfield East, PE-1206-78,
requests an extension of the approval of the preliminary subdivision.
The proposal is to divide approximately 86 acres into 266 lots for
single family residences. The proposed subdivision is located i n
Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E.W.M., Spokane County,
Washington.
Any party wishing to comment on the proposed Time Extension
request should send comments to be received no later than the close
of business hours on December 21, 1995 to the attention of J o h n
Pederson, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, 1026 West
Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. For further information contact the
above person at (509) 456-2205.
'Ad, "
Pederson
~S=ior Planner
~
f
NOTICE OF TRANS-MITTAL
DATE:
.
TO •_,~V0 1 t
, ~ ,
RE : - -
AO 1"_-
'IV
SPOK,Al~ COUNTY
ATTACHED FIND:
SHOP DRAWINGS: PRINTS/PLANS:
SPECIFICATIONS. OTHER-
NUMBER OF PAGES(excluding cover) ~
REASON FOR TRANSMITTAL:
YOUR YOUR USE/ REVTEW &
APPROVAL INFORMATION COMMENT
, CORRECTIONS APPROVED OTHER
NEEDED AS NOTED
.
REMARcs:
.
SENT BY: , COPY TO:
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING
W 1026 BROADWAY AVENLIE - SPOKANE, WASH(NGTON 99260
/
BUII,DING SECT'ION PLANNING SECTTON
PHONE (509) 456-3675 PHONE (509) 456-2205
ADMINISTRATION FAX (509) 456-4703 FAX (509) 456-2243
PERMTT CENTER FAX (509)324-3198
u
P. 1
COMMUtr 1TION RESULT REPORT ( OCT.31.199E ~ ':07PM
WTI SPK CNTY BLDG&PLANNING
FILE MODE OPTION ADDRESS (GROUP) RESULT PAGE
924 MEMORY TX 94586844 OK P. 6i6
REASON FOR ERROR
E-1) HANG UP OR LINE FAIL E-2) BUSY
E-3) NO ANSWER -_E-4) NO FACSIMILE CONNECTION
. . Post-It- brand fax transmittal memo 7671 # of pVeB ►
F
-r iot -
. - o.
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DNY$ papt Phom # 4a-&
ftx # ftX#
~
Y11T THE 11KATTER OF AN EXTENSION
)
~ OF TIME 1tEQUESx FOR PE-1206-78 ) FI,NDINGS OF FACT
Si7MMER,FIEZD EAST, AN APPRUVED ) CONCL[JSIONS AND
' PRELIMINARY PLAT
DECYSION
1M5 MA7"TER, a request for an extension of time from Ken lupper, has been xeceived and
decided upon, pursuant to Sgokane County Subdiyaision regulafiou (Chapter III, Section Gr) and
RCW 5$.17.140,
FINDINGS OF FA,CT AND CONCLUSYQNS
1. The individual signing below has be,en properly deiegated the respansibility for renderiug
this decision by the Spokane Caunty Director of Pianning.
2. The original progosai was to subdivide approaim,ately 91 acres into 2681ats for si.ngle
fanaaly dwellings aud a zone recl.assification finom Agncultural(A) to Single Family
Residential (R- 1),
3. The subject pteliminary plat was approvetl by the Hearing Examiner Committee on Yanuary
30, 1979.
FROM:SPO COUNTY PLANN" ` T0:9P4582728 - OCT 27, 1995 10:12AM P.02
,
' . ,
SPOKANE COUN'Z'X PLANNING ]DEYARTIVIENT
YRIEL~MINARY PLA.T
EX'1'ENSi(}N OF '1'1ME FORM
Plat Nuniber: PE 1206-78 Plat Name; Summerfield East
# of Lots: _2,6 h # of Acres: 86
; Sponsor: Ken Tupper vwi1er: Ken Tupper
; Windermere/Tupper Realty Windermere/Tupper Rea fty
. Addmss; E. 12929 Spraque Ave. qddmsq; E. 12929 Sprague Ave .
City, State, 7.ip: Spokane, WA 99216 City,Stntc, 7.ip: Spokane, WA 99216
. Phone: 9 2 8-1 991 P}ionc: 9 2 8-19 91
~
; Engineer/Surveyor: Inland Pacific Enqineerinq
~ Address: 707 w. 7th, Suite 200
City, Statet Zir: Spokane, WA 9 9 2 0 4
Phone: 458-6840
PHASED PRUJECT
('PO Bfi CONP'L.BTEn QNL,x IF'THTs PLA.T IS BFiING DfiVfiLOPF-D AND F1NALI7.Eb IN I'HAS ES)
# of lots originally approvcd: 266
• # of phascs finalized to datc: 'I
, # of lots remaining to be finalized; 133
# of acres remaining: 45 ac re s
PLEASE COME'LB7'E TIIE FOI.LOWING INFORMATION:
Briefly summarize the rogress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be finHlized {i.e., physicli
construction, bonding or improvements, surveying and drafting work, accomplishing various
dcpa.rimcnUa] requiremeiits, obtainins or granting eascments, etc.)
. See attached
C30"ws'
~ ~ . .
~ 'b A TE APPLICANT/SUR IlYO
, , .
PLEASfi RETURN 7'iIIS F4RM A,i,aNC wI7'~ JURBXI'BNSION Ok' 7'I.N1E k'EX,
.
. id/~/~
.
1 ~
. ~
A'TTACHMENT TO EXTENS T ON OF T IME FORM
Four phases of the Summerfield East plat have been
finalized inta 135 lots. Finalization of the remaining 133
lats on 45 acres have been delayed due to difficulties in
obtaining approval of the storm urater management system to
handle off site drainage on to the site fram Forker
draw. In the past three years, the develaper has engaged
in engineering and geological investigations of the
Forker draw watershed culminating in a"Gevlogy Report of
the Forker Draw Watershed" which was submitted to Spokane
Caunty and the Federal Emergency Management Agency
( FEMA) . In addition, several en.gineering and design
reports for construction af a storm water system capable of
handling 100 year floar events have been praduced and
submitted for review by Spokane County. Also, working in
canjunction witll Spokane County, develaper has sought
changes in FEMA's designation of Forker draw as a
"alluvial fan" and also sought changes in the 100 year
f lcaod pl ain boundary. FENlA ` s determination in thi s
regard was made this summer and only nvw, can eragineering
designs for the storm water system for this plat be
finalized.
The resolution of storm water issues for this plat is
camplicated and difficult involving not anly the
cancurrence of Spokane County but coordiraation with
FEMA. As nated above, the developer had diligently
pursued all various design options and :has produced
ariginal research an.d report on the Forker draw
watershed. Having completed this work, the Summerfield
plat should be extended for an addit:i.ona'1 three year period
of t ime .
r
~
. BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION )
OF TIME REQUEST FOR PE-1206-78 ) FINDINGS OF FACT
SUMMERFIELD EAST, AN APPROVED ) CONCLUSIONS AND
PRELIMINARY PLAT ) DECISION
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ken Tupper, has been received and
decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and
RCW 58.17.140.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering
this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning.
2. The original proposal was to subdivide approximately 91 acres into 2681ots for single
family dwellings and a zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to Single Family
Residential (R-1).
3. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on January
30, 1979.
4. The proposal is generally located north of Wellesley Avenue, south of Forker Road and
west of Progress Road in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 E.W.M. Spokane
County, Washington.
5. The existing zoning of the property descnbed in the application is Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5), previously established as Agricultural (A) zorung in 1961 and redesignated to
Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) on January 1, 1991 consistent with the Program to
Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The current Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-
3.5) zoning of the subject property is conslstent with the original zone reclassification to
Single Family Residential (R-1).
6. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the
location is within the Prioriry Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation
remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Portions of the prelim.inary
plat adjacent to Forker Road are affected by the Spokane Counry Arterial Road Plan.
Implementation of the arterial road plan will require reservation of a Future Acquisition
Area and special setbacks adjacent to Forker Road.
7. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for
the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and
department poLicy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section
G of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this
decision.
Section G states, "Approval of a preliminary subdivision shall automatically expire three
years after preliminary approval is granted unless a time extension is applied for." and
follows with "Upon apphcation for time extension, the Planning Director or designee may
administratively approve extensions for up to three (3) year periods provided at least one of
the following circumstances is fount to apply:" The following are the relevant sections of
Section G and the Plannzng Department response:
1. That some portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last
extension was granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development
consistent with the onginal approval;
RESPONSE: Four phases of the original preliminary plat have been finalized for a
total of 1351ots with 1331ots remaining to be finalized. Additional phases have not
been subm.itted for final plat review.
2. That the preliminary plat as approved remains consistent with the Generalized
Comprehensive Plan for Spokane County insofar as densiry AND other development
provisions apply, and the sponsor has taken substantial steps towards finalizing his
plat, which shall include but not be limlted to:
a. surveying the lots within the development,
b. arranging for public services to the site,
Extension of Time Findings PE-1206-78 Page 2
c. obtain.ing necessary financing for all or a portion of the preliminary plat,
d. the completion of studies or other requlrements which were part of preliminary
plat approval;
RESPONSE: The applicant has indicated that engineering and design reports for
construction of a storm water management system for managing 100-year flood
events have been submitted to Spokane County for review. In addition, the applicant
has sought changes to the identified 100-year flood plain boundary.
3. That at the time preliminary approval was granted, development of the proposal was
conditioned upon the extension of public services which are not yet available. This
provislon shall not apply to public utility extension which the project sponsor would
normally fund.
RESPONSE: Not applicable.
8. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and
departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health District, County
Utillties and the Department of Building & Safety.
9. This is the eighth request for a time extension. The total life of the preliminary plat has
been approximately 16 years.
10. The following facts are also relevant.
a. The applicant has demonstrated substantial progress towards finalizing the remaining
portions of the preliminary plat. Therefore, a three-year extension of time is
warranted.
11. The applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying with Chapter ILI,
Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time.
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for
application PE-1206-78/ZE-202-78 is hereby APPROVED until February 1, 1999.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (UPDATED)
1. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record.
2. The preliminary subdivision shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as
amended.
3. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of
record. No increase of densiry or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition
application submittal and approval.
4. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance
with these Findings and Conditions of Approval.
5. A final plat name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be
approved by the Planning Director/deslgnee.
6. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
7. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all
private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the followtng statement:
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be deternuned at the time building pernlits are
requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks
indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained."
8. The prelim.inary plat is given a time extension for three (3) years, specifically to February
l, 1999. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitting a written request
approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date.
Extension of Time Findings PE-1206-78 Page 3
9. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat.
Written approval of utillty easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with
the submittal of the final plat.
10. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to
filing the final plat.
11. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall subm.it one
or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the
appropriate assessor's map scale.
12. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County
Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in
part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as an appeal and shall provide the following:
a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities,
in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along Forker Road.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code
shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utslities. If any of
the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the
applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made.
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking,
surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses.
13. The plat dedlcation shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub
road or temporary cul-de-sac:
"Lot(s) [ Block(s) [ ] are located on a temporary cul-de-sac/stub road. This
temporary cul-de-sac/stub street may be extended to provide access to adjacent property
andlor connect to existing roads or new roads as development and/or circulation needs
dictate."
14. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or
exceed the rrunimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat.
15. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection sha11 be
approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building &
Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan,
prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conformance with their respective needs
and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency
suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor.
16. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of
improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in
accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion
of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application
for building permits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a
provision holding Spokane Counry and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot
purchaser refused a building pernut due to the fallure of the subdivislon sponsor to
satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
17. The final plat dedication shall contain the following statement:
"The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health
authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and
water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the
applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to
each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a bullding permit for each lot."
18. No building pernut will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certlfied by a
Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the
approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification
r
Extension of Time Findings PE-1206-78 Page 4
may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as
a schematic map showing the "as-built" water system.
19. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan
may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from tlie
appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an
existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to
ensure the public health, safety and general welfare.
20. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat.
21. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon afinding of substantial
compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the
prelim.inary subdivision approval will become null and void.
22. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the
retainage basin in the storm drainage plan.
23. That a11 construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollution Control
Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques.
24. That the sponsor bmit the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
25. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to
those required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress
Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
26. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the approxlmately 900 feet
com.mon lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any
finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West
Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT (UPDATED)
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication
of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of
record.
2. Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing proposed
street centerline and curb grades shall be submltted to the County Engineer for approval
prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the
dlrection of a licensed Professional Civsl Engineer.
3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be
submitted to the Counry Engineer for approval prior to construction andlor the filing of the
final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil
Engineer.
4. Construction withln the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the
direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the Counry Engineer
with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the
lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed
monuments have been replaced.
5. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-
way until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to
inspection and approval by the Counry Engineer.
6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed
prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to
cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as-built" plans
and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer.
7. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to
County standards and established as county roads.
8. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one-half (1/2) rights-of-way and stub
road connections are the responsibiliry of the owner, developer or applicant.
Extension of Time Findings PE-1206-78 Page 5
9. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution
establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
10. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to
Wellington Avenue, Forker Road, and Progress Road.
11. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right-of-way along Progress Road is required.
12. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road.
Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used.
13. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
14. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway
routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record,
and along Wellesley Avenue.
15. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103
and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
16. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should
flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to that road.
17. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the
Spokane County Engineers.
18. There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to
evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released
FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans sha11 be developed prior to
finalizatlon of any further phases.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (UPDATED)
1. The final plat shall be designed as indlcated on the preliminary plat of record andlor any
attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indlcated on copies of the preliminary plat of record
for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane Counry Health District. Written approval of the easements by
the utiliry companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
6. Pnor to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane
County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of
the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lles within the
recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic urigation use and fire
protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been
approved by the fire protection district and the appropnate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the
filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with
their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and
certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
9. The purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that
appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction
of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time
schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by
the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building pernuts within the plat.
Extension of Time Findings PE-1206-78 Page 6
The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of
Spokane, Spokane Counry Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any
lot/tract purchaser refused a building pernut due to failure of the plat sponsor to
satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
10 Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane
County Health District that suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal systems are available
on all lots within the approved prelim.inary plat not already finalized.
11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permlts by the health officer, the
use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and
issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on-slte sewage systems may be
authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is
prohibited."
14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as
approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and purveyor, will be
installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for indlvidual domestic water
service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot."
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use of on-
site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on
compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of perm.its by
the Health District.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future areawide
collection systems.
-/-t-
DATED THIS DAY OF JANUARY, 1996.
HN PE (4RSA
101
Senior PlanUnder state law and county ordinance, you have the nght to appeal tlus decision to the Spokane
County Hearing Exan.iner Comnuttee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be
scheduled. To file such an appeal, you must submit a letter along with the appropriate processing
fee payable to the Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (10) calendar days from the
date this decision is signed.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456-2205.
c: Division of Engineering
Division of Utilities
Counry Health District
Division of Building and Planning
Ken Tupper, Windermere Realty, 12929 East Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Inland Pacific Engineering, 707 West 7th Avenue, Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204
~ -
WITHERSPOON, KELLEY, DAVENPORT & TOOLE
A PROFESSIONAL SERV[CE CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS & COUNSELORS
ROBERT L AlAGNUSON 1100 U S BANK BUILDING COEUR D'ALFNE OFFICE
NEA M BAR,YES 422 WEST RIVERSIDB T}IE SPOKESMAN REVIEW BUILDING
WIL4IA.N D SYMMES'• SPOKANE, WASF(INGTON 99201-0390 GOS NOR'IHWEST BOUI.EVARD SU17E 401
ROBERT H LM4P Telenhone 509 624-5265 COEUR D'nt,mre, In,uto 83814-2146
u. THoMas corrNou.Y Telecopier 509~ 458-2728 (208)e67.4000
'1710MAS D COCF[RAN
DUANE M SWINPON
JOSEPH H WESSMAN
JEFFRE'' L SUPINGER• October 30, 1995
DONALD J LUKES+$
LESLIE R. 1YEA711ERHEAD'
MTCHAEt, D CURRIN
' BRIAN T REICOf'F:E•
'EDWARD 1 ANSON++
R. MAX EiTPR. JA.
STANLEY R.SCHULTZ
M9CHAEL F :f[ENSPEDT'
IOHN M. RILEY Ill
F 1 DU1,4ANTY.IR
DANIELE.FINNEY Spokane County Planning
MARY R. GIANNIM* :
DHNN 1026 W. Broadway
IS M DAVIS.+ 7~
TLMO'R{Y M LAWLOR Spokane, T7 YYt'~ 9 9 2 6 0
SPEN(ER A.W STRO.~IBFRG• `
7'ED S 0'NEAL
WiLL1AM M SYDf.+viES
R08ERTS MAGNUSON RE : Extension of Time Request for Summerf ield East
MARK A. ELLINGSQd
OFCOUNSII. Dear Sir or Madam:
WM A. DAVENPORT
` lOF(V E. }{EATH, 1R
ALI.AVHTOOLE Please find enclosed a copy of the Findings of fact
WILLI/UNV iCELLEY
KARLK KROGUE Conclusions and Decision in the matter of an extension of
•AL<o.dminedisldaho time request for Summerfield East which was inadvertently
+pho~dmltedm Naw Yort g iven to me f rom your f i 1 e.
Also ~dmiftsd in Ql.fomu
•4ndmimdEn W,damJy
I.Wn mdwtted m QtBen
Very trul -yours,
4
~ -
`
STANL Y R. SCHULTZ
~
>
SRS/jlw
enclosure
9510.013
RECEIVED
SPOKANE C4UNTY
- M
, .
. 0 C T 31 1995
~
DIVISION OF BU{LD{NCi AND PLANNING
BY:
BEFORE SPUKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSIUN )
OF TYME REQUEST F'OR ) FINDINGS OF FACT •
SUMMERFIELD EAST PE-1206-78, ) CONCLUSIONS AND
ZE-202-7$ AN APPROVED 1 nECIS~OI`l
PRELiivTiYNARY PLAT. )
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ken Tupper has been received and
decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter r1T, Section G) and
RCW 58.17 140.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The individual slgning below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this
decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning
2 The subject prelinunary plat was approved by the Heanng Examiner Committee on January
30, 1979.
3. The original subdivision request included a zone reclassification from Agricultural (A) to
Single Family Residential (R-X) under the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The
Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code specified Urban Residential-3.5
(UR-3.5) zoning for those properties that are; 1) located within the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan and; 2) within the Urban Impact Area and; 3) with Agricultural (A),
Agricultural Suburban (AS), or Single Family Residennal (R-1) zoning prior to January 1,
1991. The current zoning of the property is Urban Residenaal-3.5 (UR-3.5) which is
consistent with the onginal application to Single Family Residential (R-1).
4. Spokane County has established specific criterla for consldering the extension of time for the
expiration of preliminary subdivislons, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department
policy for short subdivistons. These criteria axe found in Chapter IJI, Section G of the
Spokane County Subdivision Ordinar.ce and have been used as a basis for tnis decision.
5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the
location is within the Priorit:y Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation ,
remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Unfinished portions of the
Summerfeld East adjacent to Forker Road are affected by dle County's adopted Arterial
Road Plan. The Department wlll require designation of Future Acquisition Area and special
setbacks along tiie Forker Road frontabe to implemerit the Arterial Road Plan.
6. No additional condinons have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and
departments, including the County Engineer's Office, County Health District, Counry
IJtilities and the Department of Building & Safety
7. This is the seventh reyuest for an extension of time. The total life of the preliminary plat has
been approximately 13 years. Four (4) phases of the preliminary plat have been finalized for
a total of 135 ]ots with 133 lots remaining. Additional phases have not been submitted for
final review since the previotIs time extension approval on November 15, 1989.
8. The applicant has indicated preliminary engi.neering work is in progress for additional phases
of development.
9. T'his extension of nme is granted based upor; mininial progress. Most serious reexaminarion
of progress toward finalizing should be shown or future extensions will likely not be
gran ted.
CONCLUSIONS
BASFD UFON A REVIEW of (a) the cnteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration
date for a preliminary plat ajid (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made.
1. A three year time extenslon is justified.
2. The applicant/owner should show continued progress toward complying with Chapter III,
Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time.
~
• ' ~ ~
► •
" 'Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 2 I
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of ame request for
application PE-1206-78 is hereby APPROVED until November 1, 1995.
Ct'JNDITIONS OF APFROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (UPDATED)
1. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record.
2. The preliminary subdivision shall comply with the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as
amended. 3. The final plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of
record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condition
applicacion submittal and approval.
4. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance
with these Findings and Condicions of Approval. .
5. A final plat name shall be indic4ted before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be
approved by the Planning Director/designee.
6. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
7. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all
private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication chall rontain the fol~o~~~ng .:~*z3e::::
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the time building permits are
requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks
indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained."
8. The preliminary plat is given a:ime extension for three (3) years, specifically to November 1, 1995. The applicant may request an extension of rime by submitting a written request
approximately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date.
9. Appropriate urility easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat.
Written approval of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with
che submittal of the final plat.
10. Three (3) current certiiicates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to
filing the final plat.
11. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one
or more maps ouclined in red of the area being finatized. The scale shall match the
appropriate assessor's map scale.
12. The Spokane Counry Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County
Auditor a Title Noace specifying a future land acquisirion area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in
pan, by tne Planning llepartment. 'I'he notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as an appeal and shall provide the following:
a. At least 20 feec of reserved future acquisition area for road rig,ht-of-way and urilities,
in addition to the existing andior newly dedicated right-of-way along Forker Road.
b. Furure building dnd other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code
shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c, No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the futtire acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of
the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the
applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made.
R E V 1/90
• z , p ~
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 3
d. The future acquisition area, unnl acquired, shall be private property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, exGi~.pt that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking,
surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses.
13. The plat dedicatlon shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub
road or temporary cul-de-sac:
"Lot(s) [ Block(s) [ ] are located on a
temporary cul-de-sac/stub road. This temporary cul-de-sac/stub street may be extended to
provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as
development andior circulation needs dicta.te."
14. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or
exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat.
15. A plan for water faciliaes adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be
approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building &
Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan,
prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in confomnance with their respective needs
and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency
suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor.
16. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual an-angements and scheduYe of improvements have been made vvith the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in
accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion
of the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior to application
for building pemuts within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a
provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot
purchaser refused a bullding permit due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to
satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
17. The final plat dedicanon shall contain the following statement:
"The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health
authorities, the local fire protection d.istrict, County Building & Safety Department and
water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the "
applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to
each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building permit for each lot."
, 18. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a
Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been i.nstalled pursuant to the
approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The' certification
may be in the form af a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as
a schematic map showing the "as-built" water system.
19. The Water Plan and the above four (4) conditions of approval regarding the Water Plan
may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the
appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district staring that simple connections to an
existing, approved water system will provide adequate domestic and fire protection water to
ensure the pu-blic health, safety and general welfare.
20. A survey is required pnor to the filing of a final plat.
21. SLusequenL extCnsion oi cinie will oniy be consiciei~ed upon a rillding of substanrial
compliance with Chapter III, Section Ci, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the
' preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void.
22. That the sponsor construct a 6 f4ot chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the
retainage basin in the stomi drainage plan.
23. That all consti•uction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air Pollurion Control
Authority to insure compllance with air polluCion requirements and control techniques.
24. That the sponsor limit the construcrion acrivities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 25. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks exclud.ing curbs (in addition to
those required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress
Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
REV 1i'90
• ' , + ~
' ' -
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 4
26 That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet
common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any
finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West
Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112. -
SPOKhNE COI7NTY ENGINEER DEYARTMENT (UPDATED)
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication
of right-of-way and approval of the road system as indicated in the preliminary plat of
record.
2. Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing proposed
street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval
pnor to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the
dlrection of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be
submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construcdon and/or the filing of the
final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil
Engineer.
4. Construction wYthin the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the direct supervision of a licensed pngineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer
with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the
lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed
monuments have been replaced.
5. No construction work is to be performed within the exisring or proposed public right-of-
way until a permlt has been issued b}► the County Engineer. All work is subject to
inspection and approva] by the County Engineer.
6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed
prior to filing each final plat, or a ~ond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to
cover the cost of construction of improvements, construction certification, "as-built" plans
and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer. 7. No direct access from lots to stub road connections until such roads are constructed to
County standards and established as county roads.
8. Road design, constr-ucaon, and drainage control for one-half (1/2) rights-of-way and stub
road connections are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant.
9 The proposed subdivislon shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No 80-1592, as amended, which resolution
establishes regularions for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
10. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to
Wellington Avenue, Forker Road, and Progress Road.
11. Dedication of 20 feet of additional right-of-way along Progress Road is required.
12. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road.
Design standards for r}eignbornood colleccion artenal shouid be used.
13. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
14. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewallcs excluding curb along pathway
routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record,
and along Wellesley Avenue.
15 That the sponsor provide stub road connecaons, to the west, to access center of Tract 103
and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
16. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should
flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to that road.
17. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the
Spokane County Engineers.
REV 1/g0
. ~ ,
• o - : 1
,
•
r
Extension of Tune Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 5
1$. There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work i$ completed to
evaluate the unpact of stornn water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released
FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed pri.or to
finalizarion of any further phases.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (UPDATED)
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preliminary plat of record and/or any
attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record
for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health Disnrict. Written approval of the easements by
the udlity companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
3 Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
Cou nty.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Depa,rtment of Health.
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the sarisfacrion of the Spokane
County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of
the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat 1?es within the
recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat. .
8. A plan for water faciliaes adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire
protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been
approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health
authoriries, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will•certify, prior to the '
filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with
their requirernents and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and
certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
9. The pu.rveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a cepy of said water plan that
appropriate conrractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction
of the water system, in accordance vvith the approved plan and time schedule. The rime
schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection by
the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat.
The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of
Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any
lotJtract purchaser refused a building permit due to failure of the plat sponsor to
satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
10 Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Spokane
County Health District that swtable sites for on-slte sewage disposal systems are available
on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized.
11 Subject co specific application approval and issusince of permits by the health officer, the
use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific application approval and
issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on-site sewage systems may be
authorized."
13 The dedicatory language on the plat shall state: "Use of private wells and water systems is
prohibited."
14. The plat dedication vvill contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as
approved by county and state health authorities, the local fire district and purveyor, will be
installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domesric water
service as well as fire protecrion to each lot prior to sale of each lot."
REV 1/90
~ WW
. . y
• •
' ' •
♦
Extension of Tune Flndings File No PE-1206-75 Page 6
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolunon No. 80-0418, the use of on-
site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is conditioned on
compliance widi all rules and regulatians of the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by
the Health District.
2. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coord.inated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3. Each new dwelling unit shall be double-plumbed for connection to future areawide
collection systems.
DATED THIS DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1992.
-
r ~
~
LPAUL F. JENSEI~-/ l
Senior Planner ,
enclosure
Under state law and county ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision tq the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing will be
scheduled. To file such an appeal, youu must submit a letter along with $140 prcx;essing fee,to the
Spokane County Planning Department, within ten (lU) calendar days from the date this decision is
signed.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Department at 456-2205.
kc/tv
c: Caunty Lngineer
County Utiliries
County Health District
County Build.ing & Safety
Ken Tupper, Windermere/Tupper Realty, E. 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA. 99216
Inland Pacific Engineering, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA. 99202
File
REV 1/40
1? ~
' • ~
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN THE MATTER OF AN EXTENSION )
OF TIME REQUEST FOR ) FINDINGS UF FACT
SUMMERFIELD EAST PE-1206-78, ) CONCLUSIONS AND
ZE-202-78 AN APPROVED ) DECISION
PRELIMINARY PLAT. )
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of rime from Ken Tupper has been received and
decided upon, pursuant to Spokane County Subdivision regulation (Chapter III, Section G) and
RCW 58.17.140.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for rendering this
decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning.
2. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on January
30, 1979.
3. The original subdivision request included a zone reclassification from Agricultural(A) to
Single Family Residential (R-1) under the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The
Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code specified Urban Residenrial-3.5
(UR-3.5) zoning for those properties that are; 1) located within the Urban category of the
Comprehensive Plan and; 2) within the Urban Impact Area and; 3) with Agricultural (A),
Agricultural Suburban (AS), or Single Family Residential (R-1) zoning prior to January 1,
' 1991. The current zoning of the property is Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) which is
consistent with the original application to Single Family Residential (R-1).
4. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time for the
expirarion of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and department
policy for short subdivisions. These criteria are found in Chapter III, Section G of the
Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance and have been used as a basis for this decision.
5. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the
location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan designation i
remains the same since the original preliminary plat approval. Unfinished portions of the ~
Summerfield East adjacent to Forker Road are affected by the County's adopted Arterial
Road Plan. The Department will require designation of Future Acquisition Area and special
setbacks along the Forker Road frontage to implement the Arterial Road Plan.
6. No additional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies and
departments, including the Counry Engineer's Office, County Health District, County
Utilides and the Department of Building & Safery.
7. This is the seventh reyuest for an extension of time. The total life of the preliminary plat has
been approximately 1,3-ydars~, Four (4) phases of the preliminary plat have been finalized for
a total of 135 lots wit 1331ots remaining. Additional phases have not been subntitted for
final review since the p~rev~~s rime extension approval on November 15, 1989.
8. The applicant has indicated preliminary engineering work is in progress for addirional phases
of development.
9. This extension of time is granted based upon minimal progress. Most serious reexamination
of progress toward finalizing should be shown or future extensions will likely not be
gran ted.
CONCLUSIONS
BASED UPON A REVIEW of (a) the cnteria for approving an extension of time of the expiration
date for a preliminary plat and (b) the above Findings of Fact, the following conclusions are made.
1. A three year time extension is justified.
2. The applicantJowner should show continued progress toward complying with Chapter III,
Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance before requesting an additional extension of time.
~
► ^
~
Extension of Tiune Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 2
I
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE Findings of Fact and Conclusions, an extension of time request for
application PE-1206-78 is hereby APPROVED until November 1, 1995.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT (UPDATED)
1. The conditions of approval apply to the preliminary subdivision of record.
2. The preliminary subdivision shall comply with the Urban Residenrial-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone as
amended.
3. The fuial plat shall be designed substantially in conformance with the preliminary plat of
record. No increase of density or number of lots shall occur without a change of condieon
application submittal and approval.
4. The Planning Director/designee shall review any proposed final plat to ensure compliance
with these Findings and Condirions of Approval.
5. A final plat name shall be indicated before the final plat is filed, such name/number to be
approved by the Planning Director/designee.
6. Appropriate road name(s) shall be indicated.
7. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear, dashed line the required yard setbacks from all
private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following statement:
"Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be deternvned at the time building permits are
requested unless these setbacks are specifically drafted on this final plat. The setbacks
indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper zoning approvals are obtained."
8. The preliminary plat is given a time extension for three (3) years, specifically to November
1, 1995. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitring a written request
appro3cimately forty-five (45) days prior to the above expirarion date.
9. Appropriate udlity easements shall be indicated on copies of the proposed final plat.
Written approva.l of utility easements by appropriate utility companies shall be received with
the submittal of the final plat.
10. Three (3) current certificates of title shall be furnished to the Planning Department prior to
filing the final plat.
11. Prior to filing of all or a portion of the final plat, the applicant's surveyor shall submit one
or more maps outlined in red of the area being finalized. The scale shall match the
appropriate assessor's map scale.
12. The Spokane County Planning Department shall prepare and record with the County
Auditor a Title Notice specifying a future land acquisition area for road right-of-way and
utilities. The reserved future acquisition area Title Notice shall be released, in full or in
part, by the Planning Department. The notice should be recorded within the same time
frame as an appeal and shall provide the following:
a. At least 20 feet of reserved future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities,
in addition to the existing and/or newly dedicated right-of-way along Forker Road.
b. Future building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code
shall be measured from the reserved future acquisition area.
c. No required landscaping, parking, '208' areas, drainfield or allowed signs should be
located within the future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities. If any of
the above improvements are made within this area, they shall be relocated at the
applicant's expense when roadway improvements are made.
REV 1/'90
I
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 3
d. The future acquisition area, until acquired, shall be private property and may be used
as allowed in the zone, except that any improvements (such as landscaping, parking,
surface drainage, drainfield, signs or others) shall be considered interim uses.
13. The plat dedicarion shall contain the following statement for those lots located on a stub
road or temporary cul-de-sac:
"Lot(s) [ Block(s) [ ] are located on a
temporary cul-de-sac/stub road. This temporary cul-de-sac/stub street may be extended to
provide access to adjacent property and/or connect to existing roads or new roads as
development and/or circulation needs dictate."
14. The final plat shall indicate yard setback arc lengths on cul-de-sac lots which meet or
exceed the minimum frontage of the underlying zone of the final plat.
15. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic service and fire protection shall be
approved by the water purveyor, appropriate fire protection district, County Building &
Safety Department and County Health District. The agencies will certify on the Water Plan,
prior to the filing of a final plat, that the plan is in conforniance with their respective needs
and regulations. The Water Plan and certification shall be drafted on a transparency
suitable for reproduction and be signed by the plat sponsor.
16. The water purveyor shall certify that appropriate contractual arrangements and schedule of
improvements have been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system in
accordance with the approved Water Plan. The time schedule shall provide for completion
of the water system and inspecrion by the appropriate health authoriaes prior to application
for building pemlits within the final plat. The arrangements or agreements shall include a
provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any lot
purchaser refused a building pernut due to the failure of the subdivision sponsor to
satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
17. T'he final plat dedication shall contain the following statement:
"The public water system, pursuant to the Water Plan approved by county and state health
authorities, the local fire protection district, County Building & Safety Department and
water purveyor, shall be installed within this subdivision or binding site plan, and the
applicant shall provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire protection to
each lot prior to sale of each lot and prior to issuance of a building perrnit for each lot."
18. No building permit will be issued for any lot within the final plat until certified by a
Washington state-licensed engineer that "the water system has been installed pursuant to the
approved Water Plan for the final plat," including a signed license stamp. The certification
may be in the form of a letter, but is preferred to be certified on a copy of the Water Plan as
a schemaric map showing the "as-built" water system.
19. The Water Plan and the above four (4) condidons of approval regarding the Water Plan
may be waived by the Planning Director/designee upon receipt of letters from the
appropriate water purveyor and fire protection district stating that simple connections to an
existing, approved water system will provide adequate domesdc and fire protection water to
ensure the public health, safery and general welfare.
20. A survey is required prior to the filing of a final plat.
21. Subsequent extension of time will only be considered upon a finding of substantial
compliance with Chapter III, Section G, of the Subdivision Ordinance; otherwise the
preliminary subdivision approval will become null and void.
22. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence around the entire periphery of the
retainage basin in the stonn drainage plan.
23. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane Counry Air Pollution Control
Authority to insure compliance with air pollution requirements and control techniques.
24. That the sponsor limit the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
25. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curbs (in addition to
those required along the pathways) and bike paths along the plat boundaries of Progress
Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
REV 1/90
. f • -
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 4
26. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the approximately 900 feet
common lot line shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any
finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West
Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
SPOKANE COUNTY ENGINEER DEPARTMENT (UPDATED)
1. The conditional approval of the plat is given by the County Engineer subject to dedication
of right-of-way and approval of the road system as ind.icated in the preliminary plat of
record.
2. Plans, profiles, and cross-sections as designed to County standards showing proposed
street centerline and curb grades shall be submitted to the County Engineer for approval
prior to construction and/or the filing of each final plat; road plans to be prepared under the
direction of a licensed Professional Civil Engineer.
3. Drainage plans and design calculations showing the alignment of drainage facilities shall be
submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to constcuction and/or the filing of the
final plat. Drainage plans to be prepared under the direction of a licensed Professional Civil
Engineer.
4. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be performed under the
direct supervision of a licensed engineer/surveyor, who shall furnish the County Engineer
with "as-built" plans and a certificate in writing that all improvements were installed to the
lines and grades shown on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed
monuments have been replaced.
5. No construcrion work is to be performed within the existing or proposed public right-of-
way unril a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
6. All construction within the existing or proposed public right-of-way is to be completed
prior to filing each final plat, or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer to
cover the cost of construction of improvements, construcdon certification, "as-built" plans
and monumenting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engineer.
7. No direct access from lots to stub road connections unril such roads are constructed to
County standards and established as county roads.
8. Road design, construction, and drainage control for one-half (1/2) rights-of-way and stub
road connecrions are the responsibility of the owner, developer or applicant.
9. The proposed subdivision shall be improved to the standards set forth in Spokane County
Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 80-1592, as amended, which resolution
establishes regulations for roads, approaches, drainage and fees in new construction.
10. A statement shall be placed in plat dedication that no direct access be allowed from lots to
Wellington Avenue, Forker Road, and Progress Road.
11. Dedication of 20 feet of addirional right-of-way along Progress Road is required.
12. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at Progress Road.
Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should be used.
13. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
14. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb along pathway
routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record,
and along Wellesley Avenue.
15. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center of Tract 103
and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
16. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road should
flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to that road.
17. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a fashion acceptable to the
Spokane County Engineers.
REV 1/90
. / J ~ -
Extension of Time Findings File No. PE-1206-78 Page 5
18. There shall be no further finalization of phases until engineering work is completed to
evaluate the impact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as predicted in newly released
FEMA maps and reports. Storm water management plans shall be developed prior to
finalizarion of any further phases.
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT (UPDATED)
1. The final plat shall be designed as indicated on the preli.minary plat of record and/or any
attached sheets as noted.
2. Appropriate utility easements shall be indicated on copies of the preliminary plat of record
for distribution by the Planning Department to the utility companies, Spokane County
Engineer and the Spokane County Health District. Written approval of the easements by
the utility companies must be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
3. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane
County.
4. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County.
5. Water service sha11 be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional
Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health.
6. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the sarisfaction of the Spokane
County Health District that an adequate and potable water supply is available to each lot of
the plat.
7. Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor sha11 present evidence that the plat lies within the
recorded service area of the water system proposed to serve the plat.
8. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation use and fire
protection use shall be approved by the water purveyor. Said water plan must have been
approved by the fire protection district and the appropriate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (purveyor) and the fire protection district will certify, prior to the
filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan that the plan is in conformance with
their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and
certification will be drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
9. T'he purveyor will also certify prior to filing the final plat on a copy of said water plan that
appropriate contractual arrangements have been made with the plat sponsor for construcrion
of the water system, in accordance with the approved plan and time schedule. The time
schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspecrion by
the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building permits within the plat.
The contractual arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County/City of
Spokane, Spokane County Health District and the purveyor harmless from claims by any
lotltract purchaser refused a building permit due to fa.ilure of the plat sponsor to
satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
10 Prior to filing the final plat, the sponsor shall demonstrate to the sarisfaction of the Spokane
County Health District that suitable sites for on-site sewage disposal systerns are available
on all lots within the approved preliminary plat not already finalized.
11. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the health officer, the
use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized.
12. The dedicatory language of the plat will state: "Subject to specific applicadon approval and
issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the use of on-site sewage systems may be
authorized."
13. The dedicatory language on the plat sha11 state: "Use of private wells and water systems is
prohibited."
14. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that: "The public water system, as
approved by county and sta.te health authorities, the local fire district and purveyor, will be
installed within this plat, and the subdivider will provide for individual domestic water
service as well as fire protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot."
REV 1/'90
f
~
Extension of Time Findings File Na. PE-1206-7 S Page 6
SPOKANE CDUNTY DI~~~ION OF TJTTLITIES
1 . pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolutivn No. 80-0418, the use of on-
site sewer disposal systems is herehy authorized. This authoriz.ation is conditianed on
compliance with all rules and regulations af the Spokane County Health District and is
further conditioned and subject to specific application approval and issuance of pernuts by
the Health District.
2. Any water service for this project shall be p~ovided in accordance with the Coordinated
Water System Plan for Spokane County, as amended.
3. Each new dwelling unit shall be doubte-plumbed for connection to future areawide
collection systems.
,
DATED THIS ~ DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1992.
1
f - ~
U TEI~~E
enivr P~ariner
enc1DSure
Under state ~aw and caunty ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the 5pokane
County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipz of an appeal, a public hearing wiIl be
scheduled. To file such an appe.al, you must submit a let~er along with $100 processing fee,to the
Spokane Caunty Planning Departrnent, within ten (10) calendar da}rs from the date this decision is
signed.
If you have any questions, please call the 1'1anning Department at 456-2205.
kc1tv
c: Courrty Engineer
County Urilities
County Hea1th District
County Building & Safety
Ken Tupper, Windermere/'Fupper Realty, E. 12929 Sprague Avenue, 5pakane, WA. 99216
In1and Pacific Engineering, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA, 99202
File
REV 1/90
RECEIVED
SPOKANE C.OUNTY pLANNING DEPARTMEN'I, M 2 81992
Srt~n.u~` ..vutvfY
- pRELIMINARY PLAT PLANNING OEPAATMENT
, EXTENSZON OF TIME FORM
,
Plat Number: ~/ZOG-+76 Plat Name: Summerf ield East
# of Lots: 266 # of Acres: 86
5ponsor: Ken Tupper OWner: Ken Tupper
Adciress: Windermere/Tupper Realty Address: Windermere/Tupper Realty
t. 1LyZy 5prague E. 12929 Sprague
City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA J~`~, ~~p. Spokane, WA
Phone. 928-1991 P11UI1C: 928-1991
Engineer/Surveyor: Inland Pacif ic Engineering
AddreSS: South 25 Altamont
City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99202
Phone: (509) 535-1410 FAX (509) 535-1942
,
PHASFD PROJEi.T
(TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BE1NG DEVELOPED AND FINALIZED IN PHASES)
# of lots originally approved: 266
# of phases finalized to date• 3
# of lots remairung to be finalized: 133
# of acres remaining: 45 acres
PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING ZNFORMATION:
Briefly summarize the progress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be finalized (i.e., physical
construction, bonding for improvements, suzveying and drafting work, accomplishing various
departmental requirements, obtaining or grantmg easements, etc.)
To date, approximately 133 lots in three phases have been developed with
streets, utilities and homes. Engineering work is currently underway to
evaluate the imvact of storm water runoff from Forker Draw as uredicted
in newly released FEMA maps and reports. It is expected that storm water
management plans will be developed which will allow the development of
Phase IV in 1993.
Augu s t 28, 1992 DAT E A PLVAN7~SURVEYOR
PLEASE RETURN TY-iIS FORM ALONG wITH $120 ExTENSXON OF rrlviE FEE.
,
ie No. PE-1206-78
ZE-202-7$
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 30, 1979,
and tthe members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Ted McCoury,
and Chairperson, Abby Byrne.
B. PROPOSAL 'The sponsor, William W. Main, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and
zone change PE-1206-78, Summerfield East, and ZE-202-78, Agricultural to
Single Family Residential for subdivision of 91 acres into 268 lots for single
family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or
representatives :
STANLEY SCHULTZ - RICHARD MASON
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That Che exisling land use in the area is cultivaled Iand.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designales this ar•ea as r°esidenlial.
3. That the existing zoning of the property describeci in lhe application is
agricultural.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The Stale Environmeiital Policy Act)
have been complied with. .
S. That the proper legal requir-ements for advertisemenL of ttie Agenda Item
have been lulf illed.
1
i "
, i .-..e No. PE-1206-78
ZE-202-78
,
. i~6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within '
the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the proposed use is compatible witti existing uses in the area.
8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimenCal
to the general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety,
, and welfare.
9. That Che owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed
use.
10. The follow'ing' are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
` a) That the adequate provisions have been made for school sites and
playgrounds as well as parks by the sponsor's negotiations with East
Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks and Recreation
Department. Further, that evidence at the hearing indicated that the
sponsor agreed to pursue and finalize those provisions as presented
at the hearing.
D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS
SUBDIVISION APPROVAL:
I f approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended.
NQTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed
hereaf'ter r
? 1. That the pfat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record
.
and/or attached sheets as noted. '
?
No. PE-1206-78
' ZE-202-78
✓ 2 That 'a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more
than one dweiling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shalf any lot be
further subdivided fior the purposes of creating additional lots or building
sites without filing a replat.
~ 3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on
the preliminary plat of record.
~4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property
be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or
deeded : A I' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or
border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when
streets terrninate at the plat boundaries. )
✓ 5. That appropriate street names be indicated.
~ 6o That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved
preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Depar•trnent and the utility
companies. Written aPQLLyal of the easements by the utility company must
~r
be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
7. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved
by the water supplier and fire prbtection district. Said water plan must
' also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will
<
_ certify, prior to the filing of tihe final plal, on the face of said water plan
that the plan is in conformance with their requireilients and will adequately
' satisfy their respective needs. Said waler plan and certiiication will be
dra( ted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
3
/ ♦ ,
r,ie No. PE-1246-78
Z E-202-78
7he purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a
copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have
been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in
accordance with the approved plarr, and in accordance with a time
schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for comp{etion of
the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior
to application for building permits within the plat. The contractual
arrangements will inelude a provision holding Spokane County and the
purveyor harmless from claims by any fot purchaser refused a building
permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the
approved water system.
✓ The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public
~ water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the
local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the
subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire
~ protection to each lot prior to sale of each Iot.
8. 7hat a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to
the filing of the final plat.
9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to February 1, 1980.
7 10. That condit al app -~ial of the plat is given subject to the dedication of
right of wa o the public and approval of the road system in the plat by . the Cou ty Engine ` .
4
. , e No. PE-1206-78
, Z E-202-78
11. That' plans, profiles, and cross secti showing proposed street centerline
and curb grades be submi to the County Engineer for approval prior
to construction and e filing of a final plat.
12. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and
alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for
approval prior to construction and the fi{ing of a fina{ plat.
ublic st eets and easements shall be
13. Construction within the proposed p
performed' uricler the direct supervisi of a Iicensed land surveyor, who
shall be responsible for perpetu ing all evidence of the location of survey
monuments which may be istrubed during construction and who shall
furnish the County En ineer with "As Built" pfans and a certificate in
writing that all impr vements were installed to the lines and grades shown
on the approved nstruction plans and that all disturbed monuments have
been replaced. ,of
~
14. No construction work is to be O'erformed within the Public Right of Way
until a permit has bee~issued by the County Engineer. All work is
~
sub)ect to inspectiand approval by the County Engineer.
15. All conslruction within the Public Righ,.t of Way is to be completed prior to
fi{ing the finai plat or a bond ~ the amount estimated by the County
" Engineer to cover the cost construction of improvements, construction
certification, "As guilt" 1ans, and monumenting the street centerlines,
shall be filed with the County Engineer.
5
e No. PE-1206-7II
ZE-202-78
16. No direct access from lots to Stub R--oad" connections until such roads are
/
constructed to County Standar s and established as County Roads.
~j.
1 i. Road design, rough gradin constr,uction, and drainage control for ~
rights of ways and S b Road connections are the responsibility of the
developer.
✓ 18. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be
approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff.
19. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that
the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water
district.
Special Conditions
20. 7hat the provisions of SEPA'S-N071CE OF ACTION pursuant to
43.21C.080 RCW and the ard of County Commissioner's Resolution
No. 77-1392 be accomp ' hed by e project applicant within thirty (30)
days of formal actio by the Board of Cunty Commissioners, with regard
to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department
staff.
'21. That upon filing of the final plat, the Zoning be reclassified to Single
Family Residential.
0
6
No. PE-1206-78
LE-202-7II
22. Thai,the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to
review any preliminary plat approval.
23. That a public water system serviced,by Trentwood Irrigation District #3,
and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the safe of tfie lot.
V"" 24. That an on-site sewage managertlent system be created and approved by
~
r-
the Health Office prior to the ning of the final plat, if more than a to[al
of 318 dwelling units are thorized within the plat.
25. Tha[ final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be
reviewed and approved prior to filing o the final plat by the County
Utilities Engineer- and the County Heal Dis rict.
LI~6 The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lat is authorized
the use of an individual o te sewage disposal system.
~
27. 7hat all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi-
~ ~
cations of the County-,f~ngineer xisting County roads providing direct
\
,
access to lots of the a,
t shal4 be paved and curbed to the standards of
the County Eny-ineer. `
8 That no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellesley Avenue and
' Progress Road and Forker a. I
r
7
. . . i!e No. PE-1206-78
• ZE-202-78
,
L/29. That the owner dedicate 20 feet ad i'onai right-of-way along Forker Road.
,
v30. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at
Progress F2oad. Design standards Jor• neighborhood coilection arterial
should be used. `if
. ~
31. Thai the spw:sor provide 50 faot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
.
32. That lhe sponsor provide and construct 6 fooi sidewa{ks excfuding curb
along pathway routes as designaied by the County Engineer, and shown on
the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue.
33. Thai ihe sponsor provide stub road connection:s, to the west, to access
center of 7 raci 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms I rrigated
Tracts. ~
34. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstrucfion of Progress Road
shauld flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage Lo
that road. 4'66' "
35. That the slub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sppwtsor, in a
fashion aceeptable to the Spokane County Engineers.
36. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot ctiainlink fence around the entire
,
periphery of the retainage basin in the storm drainage plan.
i
8
ile r~o. F'E - 1ZUb-78
7_E-202
37. That 'the use of the park 7<n, dc,~ n~,ted t~ tiie County t~y Ltie sponsor
,
be used for parks and p vemen[s within a two-mile radius of this
` proposal.
38. That all constructi ~
on will be monitored by the Spokane County Air
Pollution Conirol Authority to insure - compliance w ith a ir' pollution
requirements and control techniques.
39. 1liat the sponsor install sedimen basir~s and drywells ~.onsistent with the
Spokane Couri'ty Waste Water Manage ent PIar).
AG. Tl,,dt ll) e spon~or~ limit the cor7struclion ac.tivities from 7:00 a.m. to
6:O0 p.m.
41. That Crie sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curbs
(in addition to those required along the pathways ) and bi ke paths along
the plat boundaries of Progress Road, and YVellesley Avenue as required
and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
~
C4422- , That the sponsor construct a
6 foot chainlink fence along the
~ ap
proximatefy 900 feet common lot line shared by this proposal and
property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any finaliZing of any phase of
.
this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West FarrTis
" Irrigated Tr•acts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
q
, - -
;
i~ No. PE-1206-78
. .
Z E-202-78
~ 43. The femporary use of an individual onZ
sysCem on each lot is
` authorized only until an area-wide oper ge system is a
vailable.
v 44. ~ Each structure from which sewage , is to issue shall be Plumbed and
connected to co4lector lines intended to serve t area even though use of
individual on-site sewage disposal is autho zed pending availability of an
~ -
~
operating area-wide sewerage system. The plumbing shall prevent entry
1
~1 (J of sewage into the colleetor lines ntil authorized by the operating agency
controlling the collector lines.
~
~ •
`r ~
45. The subdivider and persons with any interest in the property within this
plat wi11 not protest a local improvement district for sanitary sewer
r( ~ improvements as may be initiate by resolution of the governing
~
municipality.
(46\ Dry sewerage lines as approved an required by the governing
~ municipality shall be installed in the platted property as same is
developed.
47'y As a consideration for the acceptance of this plat by the Spokane County
~
Board of Commissioners, the owners of all non-public property herein
platted into lots, blocks or tracts agree not to protest under 36.94 or
35.43.180 RC4V the construction of or legal assessment for, any sewer
`ultimately serving their non-pu lic property as such time it is desired by
the governing municipality to construct such sewers. The agreement
herein expressed shail be considered a covenant to run with the land and
shall be car-ried as a provision of each and every deed drawn to transfer
0
0
ownership of any and AI property de{ineated within this plat.
10
. _ ; No. PE-1206-78
" • ZE-202-7$
~ 48. The dedicatory language of the plat shall include language as indicated tn
G~ Conditions #43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 above
~ E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds
that the application of William W. Main for a preliminary plat, Summerfield
East, and zone change from Agricultural to Single Family ResidenCial as
described in the application should be approved.
,
Motion by r McCou ry Seconded by : Thomas
Vote: Unanimous
HEARING EXAMINER COMMIYTEE
irman
4a
.~D
~ ~
ATTEST :
FRED L. DAYHARSH
Planning Director
,
B Y : "
J ,
l
11
L C\z~7' ' ~
- _ - ~ - - _
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING M 721 JEFFERSON STREET
! -
PHONE 456-2205
.6; SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
. i + ? 'Y 3• SPONANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE
MEMORANDUM
'PO: Spokane County County Engineer
Spokane County Utilities
Spokane County Health District
Spokane County Department of Building & Safety
Fire Protection District No. 1
Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3
FROM: Thomas Veljic, Planner I
DATE: September 8, 1992
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Summerfield East, PE-1206-78
The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an
Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Summerfield East, File No. PE-1206-78.
If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be
made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments by September 22,
1992.
Thank you.
kc
c: Ken Tupper, WindermerefTupper Realty, E. 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA.
99216
Inland Pacific Engineering, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA. 99202
Enclosure
~
o, ~ 1
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
.
PHONE 456-2205
.
S -a 7
qp=,,._~,_ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANE COUnTY COURT HOUSE
'PO: Spokane Chronicle FROM: Spokane County Planning Department
Thomas Veljic, Planner I
RE: Extenti n f Time ad for PE- - v
0 o 1206 92
DATE: September 8,1992 `
Please publish the enclosed Notice of Extenrion of Time application, one rime only, in your
Friday, September 11,1992, publication and bill the above addressee.
kc
enclosure
rev2/90
. ~
NOTICE OF TIME EXTENSION REQUEST
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN by Spokane County that the owner of the
preliminary subdivision known as Summerfield East, PE-1206-78,
requests an extension of the approval of the preliminary subdivision.
The proposal is to divide 86 acres into 266 lots. The proposed
subdivision is located in Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44
E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington.
Any party wishing to comment on the proposed Time Extension
request should send comments to be received no later than the close
of business hours on September 22, 1992 at the following address:
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, N. 721 Jefferson,
Broadway Center Building, Spokane, WA 99260. For further
inform tion please contact me at (509) 456-2205.
i0
THOMAS VELJIC, ANNER I
kc
kc/revised 3-90
M q
•
• ~ ~y4~t + ' ~ _ ~ ,
. , .
,
~ ' • ,
~ ~•ti ' ~ .i
,
' .I
- ~I
~
• ' ~ J
~ ~ ~ " + , .•'r)~ t~ li ` }.1~± ir~~ r C ~rl ~ r !
SPOHANC COUNTVCOURTHOUSC
TE :
DA
~ j .
TO
FROM :
PAGES 'Y'O FOLLO'PV :
SPOKAN'E COCJNT'Y PLANNING D►EPART'MENT
NORTH 721 JEFFERSON STREET
spoKANE, wA 99260
1'HONE (509) 456-2205 :
FAx (509) 456-2243
. ~
REV 5/$9:FCU
~
.
i~
P 433 075 663
RECE FDR CERTIFIED MAIL
aWHANGE COPP+zRAGE "{]YIDED
flOT F411 YNTF_ANAbIONAL IUAi(
~See Rever5e)
+n
~ ~ ~ • ~
~
~ Set anoN
c~.- R Mt- n0 F"
~n ~ _
Pca tage
~
GerLikwed Fee -
x
5oerAia.1 QeO+rery Fee
~ I
ReSlricle[i [3t-kivery Fee
~
i~
Re#Urn ReCEiQt Shtiwing . (53 t0 wharn and Date Deliv+eced II
ul7 . ~
~ Relurrr ReCeap# showin lo wh0~'n. ~ 1 ~
~}ate. d~l~[1 Aldtlre55 Uf ~eIIVeP}r i
_ ,
c
TOT.At Ptttsxage and Fee-s s
~ T
~ k'ostmark or Qate 0 I
4L
EL ~
G z
LL
z
z
~ I ~ I
J
EL ,
~
P 433 075 662 Cri lu~
In ~
RE+~E F[3p CERTIFIE[~ 1~A1~. ~ ~
h+. ,NStlHGMWCE Cf1VERAGE PROWIDED CID LL -j
7
~ .
NDT iWH:F~FINATIOW+ML MAIL ~ ~ ' ~ ~ i
~ i`&ee Reversa)
Z: 0- _-I ~ I ^ zi
w F Ci U"`7 r•- I
z U') f17 -1
~ S~r antl Mr~.
0~ P t 2 a:nd Z1R Code,.,
a ' ~ ` I ~ z
PC [age 5 ~ 0 ~ I LL,
Cef1d ied Fee W ~ U
SpECraM ()e4very Fee i f
FfeStric4ec.f Delrvery Fei
%turn ReceMpx 5howrng
C[a wht7rrr and Dale Deliwered
Ln
cc Returati RE+ceip1 5hifwi t4 whcm
Date. ard Address ot&livery
4~ - -
c
z TOTAL Postage ar+d Fees -
~
~ PoSlrnark at C]ate
1
~
,
_ ~
6?i1
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CEh'TRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2205
'
i- 7 I'
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
, -
SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE
August 14, 1992
Ken Tupper
East 12929 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99216
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for PE-1206-78, Summerf'ield East
Our files indicate that your preliminary subdivision is soon to expire October 1, 1992.
In order to extend the preliminary approval, you must apply for an Extension of Time by
completing the attached form. The Planning Department will review the file for an
extension and after review and comments from the County agencies will make an
administrative decision whether to approve or deny an extension. Also, the County
agencies may request additional, new conditions during their review to bring the proposal
up to current standards. Your subdivision efforts are measured against the criteria
established in Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance
(enclosed).
A fee of One Hundred Twenty Dollars ($120.00), payable to the Spokane County Planning
Department, must accompany your application to cover the cost of the time extension
request.
This certif'ied letter will be the only reminder from our office. The preliminary subdivision
will become NULL & VOID on the expirarion date if an extension is not approved. In
order to process an extension request, it will be necessary to receive an application by
August 28, 1992.
If you apply for an extension, you will be notified when a decision is made.
Paul F. Jensen
j Senior Planner
kc
Enclosure
c: Patrick J. Moore, Inland Pacific Engineering, South 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA.
99202
Rev 1/90
\
- ' S
1
~
•
BEFORE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
IN TT3E MATTER OF AN EXTENSION ) FINDINGS OF FACT
OF TIME REQUEST ASSOCIATED ) CONCLUSIONS AND
WITH ZE-202-78 AND PE-1206-78, ) DECISION
SUMMERFIELD EAST )
AN APPROVED PRELIlVIINARY PLAT )
THIS MATTER, a request for an extension of time from Ken Tupper, has been received and
decided upon, pursuant to Spokane Counry Subdivision regulation, more specif'ically based on
RCW 58.17.140 Chapter III, Section G.
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The individual signing below has been properly delegated the responsibility for
rendering this decision by the Spokane County Director of Planning.
2. Spokane County has established specific criteria for considering the extension of time
for the expiration of preliminary subdivisions, specifically for regular subdivisions, and
department policy for short subdivisions.
3. Such extensions of rime may be up to and includ.ing three-year extensions.
4. The subject preliminary plat was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee on
January 30, 1979.
5. The original zoning approval was from Agricultural zoning to R-1 zoning.
6. If finalizarion of this plat does not occur prior to January lst, 1991, the exisring zoning
will be changed to the appropriate 'New Zone,' which may allow different uses and
standards.
7. The Comprehensive Plan designates this area of the preliminary plat as Urban, and the
location is within the Priority Sewer Service Area. The Comprehensive Plan
designarion remains the same.
8. Since the original approval of the subdivision and since the last rime extension in 1986,
the County has adopted an arterial road plan which would affect the unfinalized portion
of Summerf'ield East along Forker Road. The Planning Department is requiring future
acquisition area for road and utilities improvements and special setbacks in anticipation
of expansion of Forker Road as a principal arterial.
9. No addirional conditions have been recommended by the various reviewing agencies
and departments, including the County Engineer's Office, the Spokane County Health
District, County Utilities and the Department of Building & Safety.
10. This is the sixth request for a time extension. Four phases, or final plats, have been
approved since the preliminary plat approval in 1979: Summerfield East (281ots),
Summerfield East lst Addition (531ots), Summerfield East 2nd Addition (191ots) and
Summerfield East 3rd Addition (34 lots). The total number of lots originally approved
is 266; the total number of lots finalized to date is 134; 1321ots remain to be finalized.
Since the last time extension, Summerf'ield East 3rd Addition has been finalized.
11. As set forth in Chapter III, Section G, of the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance,
approval for an extension of time for up to three years is discredonary, providing some
portion of the existing preliminary plat has been finalized since the last extension was
granted and the remaining lots would form a unified development consistent with the
original approval.
CONCLUSION
BASED UPON A REVIEW of the criteria for approving an Extension of Time request, the
following conclusion is made.
The subdivision shall be allowed a three-year time extension.
DECISION
BASED UPON THE ABOVE findings of fact and conclusion, an Extension of Time request
for Application PE-1206-78 is hereby APPROVED until October 1, 1992.
/
.
.r Y_-~
~
PE-1206-78 Time Extension Findings and Decision Page 2
CONDTTIONS OF APPROVAL
1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
2. Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order dated January 30, 1979 and updated
conditions from previous extensions of time, with the following added conditions.
3. The preliminary plat is given conditional approval for three (3) years, specifically to
October 1, 1992. The applicant may request an extension of time by submitring a
written request approximately forry-five (45) days prior to the above expiration date.
4. The final plat map shall indicate by a clear dashed line the required yard setbacks from
all private, "Tract X" or public roads. The dedication shall contain the following
statement: "Side yard and rear yard setbacks shall be determined at the rime building
permits are requested. The setbacks indicated on this plat may be varied from if proper
zoning approvals are obtained."
5. Spokane Counry Planning Department is required to record with the County Auditor a
"Title Notice," as prepared and signed by the applicant, for a future acquisition area for
road right-of-way and utiliries, to run with the land, and the future acquisirion area
reservation shall not be removed without prior approval by the Spokane County
Planning Departnent. Notice shall be recorded prior to final plat approval and shall
provide the following:
a. Twenty (20) feet of future acquisition area for road right-of-way and utilities, in
addirion to the existing right-of-way dedicarion required by the County Engineer,
along Forker Road.
b. Building and other setbacks required by the Spokane County Zoning Code shall be
measured thirty-five (35) feet from the southerly edge of the Future Acquisition
Area that is reserved for road right-of-way and uti.lities along Forker Road.
c. The twenry (20)-foot Future Acquisition Area, until acquired by Spokane County,
shall be private property and may be used as allowed in the zone, except any
improvements (such as landscaping, parking, surface drainage, drainfields, signs
or others) shall be considered "interim" uses.
The property owner shall be responsible for relocating such "interim"
improvements at the time Spokane County makes roadway improvements after
acquiring said Future Acquisition Area.
d. This "Title Notice" shall be signed by the applicant to serve as official notice and
acknowledgement of said Future Acquisition Area for road right-of-way and
utiliries. "0000
DATED THIS ,5 DAY OF , 19~ ~
.
PAUL F. JENSEN
Planner II
Under State Law and County Ordinance, you have the right to appeal this decision to the
Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. Upon receipt of an appeal, a public hearing
will be scheduled. If you desire to file such an appeal, you must subnut a letter along with
$100 processing fee, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, within ten (10) calendar days
from the date this decision is signed.
If you have any questions, please call the Planning Deparnnent at 456-2205.
mo
c: County Engineer
County Utilities
County Health District
County Building & Safety
Sponsor: Ken Tupper, East 12929 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA 99216
Surveyor: Patrick J. Moore, Inland Pacific Engineering, South 25 Altamont, Spokane,
WA 99202
r
Enclosure
E~..
~
' I
~ SElWDER._Comnleta Itemr 'b and F vrrhen addirioi~al servk~ ~in d~~sl, and complete lterna
3 and 4. '
~ ~Mut your eddress 1i "RE1UAN TO" Speca on the reverse side. FaClure 5 thia wHl preW9nt thfQ
cerd firam being returiied tD YQu. Tha return recei t fee will r~vida ou the neme nf the aersan delivered
MOTICE UF T1ME EXTENS]uN "i.ta and 4he d aof-deitve , For a rtione ees t eo awin~ serwiees are avei n s. ansu t postmaster
or ges an chsc ox es #4r 8dditiCn81 sanriGB(81 reqU06T.
' 1. ❑ Shuw to whvm delivared, date, and eddresaea's address. 2. 0 Resvacled Depivery
Date sent tertified ~chargG~ ~~m rhaW)
3. Artdcle Addressed ta; 4. Article Number
Date re[eivcd reply
Type of Service:
Received ck M far S100 9^c'~a F-I ~
1:1 coo .
❑ Expreae Mall Q Retuffi Receipt
GVA far MI chendlxe
Date cr rtu1 aled Coa,nly rnemo Alwaya oDtein a#pneturo of eddrnssne
nr agent ELIVERED.
Oate sent 1o Va1a(-p lierafd 5. 5fgnsture - Address s8 (v,vrY ~f
~
Da te a 1 f~~~~. i ~ i u~F S. 5- ure - e~t ~
~ 0~ ~
Date sefll (ll'c151on l0 Sp0l15Qr 7, et6of Ci91i►re
PS Fom 3$11, Mer. ig8(i +U3,G.P.0. 1988-212-885 D MEST1C RETURN REC£1FT
- - • - - - -
j--
,
r
~
. .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
i i
~ i
~ PMONE 456-2205
r,. SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
. . , 4, c{ s sr ,
SPOKAN[ COUnTr COURT MOUSE
September 20, 1989
Ken Tupper
E. 12929 Sprague
Spokane, WA 99216
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Summerfield East PE-1206-78
Our files indicate that your preliminary subdivision, known as SUMMERFIELD EAST
PE-1206-78 is soon to expire (October 1 st, 1989).
In order to extend the preliminary approval, you must apply for an Extension of Time
by completing the attached form. The Planning Department will review the file for an
extension and after review and oomments from the County agencies will make an
- administrative decision whether to approve or deny an extension. Also, the County
j agencies may request additional,new oonditions during their review to bring the
proposal up to current standards.
A fee of $100, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, must accompany your
application to cover the oost of the time extension request.
This certified letter will be the only reminder from our office and you must respond
by November 1, 1989. If we do not receive any response by that time, we will assume
you are not interested in pursuing an Extension for this proposal and thus the
preliminary subdivision will become NULL & VOID.
If y for an ex nsion, you will be notified when a decision is made.
omas G. Mosher P
Senior Planner
1P
Enclosure
c: Inland Pacific Engineering, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA 99202
89 15 : 16 I D:L1T I L I TY SF'O TEL NO : 50q-455-4?15 #199 P01
`
!
~
I ~
w
* * * * * M~ * ~ ~ * ~ * * * * * ~
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
i
w * * *
sPoKANE t;oIJNTY ~
a
1aFPARTMENT OF PUB1..JC w'ORKS
OFFICE OF THE COUNT'Y 'ENGINEER
N. 811 JEFFERSON ST.
~ SPOKANE, WA 99260-0180
FAX (509) 456-4715
TEL (509) 456-3600
f DAT1J: i-P r Ly -0 TI1T1E:
TO• L]NnT 1 lv+~ _
I DEPARTMENT; TjAaj&~ - i r-~q
' t
FAX TELEPHONE: 4
~ VOICE TELEPHONE:
~
FR0 M: p„ tj a)
DEPARTMENT: 00 cA~fi~ -e -e t';L, c,
t ►
C oMlviENTS: .
;
,
_
,
;
PAGE ~ 0 F
;
~
- - . _ _ . _ - _ _ - . _ _
,
~ _ - _
TEL NG1: c~4~9-455-~b~
, ~ i- }k~ ';39 15~ 1~ 1D:►ITIL I~`~ SF'C~
r► , a
~ -
~
,
0~- THE CeIt JNrY ENcIIivCER
Sf'Ok:Af+1~°' COUfV'rY p WASHTdVG'TOiV
i
llctober 16p 1'9F3'~
1
~~OKA!`!E (;,;I:]UNl"Y PLANNlhlG DEPARTMEiV'1" (Currenti hlanninq
j , Adrriinistr~tor:j
;
,
FRt7M: SPOKANE CGJUIVTY ENGIN~:.-.~~R V e amiz
~
SU13J: Ti.m~ Extension F2eqE,test PE 12206-70
i
~ ( .
We have reviewed the ahi:)ve referenced time exten~-,ion reque(5ta
` We havf~ rn,:) rommer~~~ mak:e conrerning thf.~ requPE:t. Iicawever you
~ shc-u1d note that sancea th~ ~port:svr,al j--jf t~je }7rola.mii")ary
' subdiva Eia on co'~c4,.ane County has ari~,~pted ar) Ar-ter ,a a1. Roac9 P,lanb
Tf~e Plan icientYfiiPs Forker R~.~2d as a Princip~,-~1 Arterial ar+d
! ProgreTs' Rclad as a Mi.rtor Arteri~l.. The s►.tbjec;t fDlat has
1
frontaqe on b,.-ith ofi thesp- r'~adways.
~
7he appli~ant sh~-ul.d be advised that tt've subject propprty is
affected by a designated FZriod HaZard Z+:.tine. 7"tie problem~
~~soci~toc1 wa.th the F1,--)r-.r.# 7or'ie were ideritified irr th~,~
:nva.ronmerita]. Zmpact; Statement for the plat. F i i'l aliMa t-.z-:- n c, •f
I fr.tture pt~a~7,es of the plat must adclrp-ss the Floc-c! 7_'one and
~ develop motl-ioda tci mitigate tf~e impacts o-P flooding. Fhx.s may
be donN whewi dras.nage plans A-re- pt~eparc;d •foir th~,s plaf;.
,
i
,
,
,
1
~
~
p 1s~01 304
FDR CERTIFiEU MA1L
IWA11CE G0VfRAGE QAOYoM
R Wt;fWAt*PIAL &W
yo+P Rev$fSe)
C'-/ L-~ ~
I'IpC
d~~wrtK~ F r~
Sp+.oW Deiivwy f•ee
i4e4titiRd De4very Fee
~ d~erum Rece+,~ ~irk)
to wA~um ar-od D:tte DelrverM
~
F'¢rlum Pkxceyst shm" lo wtwxn_
° Date, ancf ,+klcvess or [5eirveirv
~ TOTAi P'ostaje arxi F--es 5
~
~ Ptts4matk nr M-3te '
• ~t~ 1 ~ ~
~ - _ - _
. E.
~
~ ` , ~ ~ ` ~ ~ `~~r, ~ ~ y
. ~ , c~ 1~ 1 .1 ~ ~ ~ . l ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
' •~~-~a ~'.~~f,++4~: "y.~~~,~ BFOADWi.v CENTRE 8U'~CING N'?! f:.~,a,.-..
4L -,W
~ ` i._. i ~i;iii, . . . ,
ME N1 U Iz
TQ: Spokane County County Engineer
Spokane County Utilities
Spokane County Hcalth District
pokane County Department of Building & Safety
4:hornas e Protection District #1
ater Purveyor: Trentwood Irrigation District #3 ~
FR G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner
- ~~t~S
DAT'E: October 9, 1489 -
,
SUBJE~':' Extension of Time for Summerfield East PE-1206-
The Spokane County Ptanning Departrnent has received the attached request for an
Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Summerf eld East, PE-1206-78.
If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe add.itional conditions should be
made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by t ber
24. 1989 .
Thank you.
tw
Enclosure
c: Ken Tupper
R ECEIVED
OCT 171989
SPOKANE COUNTY
PUIMNING OENARTMENt
r%
EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATOR
FINDINGS OF FACT
File No: PE-1206-78 & ZE 202-78
Name: SUMMERFIELD EAST
1. That the preliminary plat was originally approved by the Hearing Examiner
Committee in a public hearing on January 30, 1979.
2. That the zoning upon finalization of the phases of this plat has been
reclassified from Agricultural to R-1, crossing over to UR 305 zoning
wi thi n the near future.
° 3. That the Comprehensi ve P1 an i s desi gnated as URBAtJ and i s wi thi n the PSSA
area.
4. That since the original approval, the applicant has completed three phases
of Summerfield East, known as Summerfield East, Summerfield East lst and
Sunmerfield East 2nd Additions, all recorded final plats totaling 100
lots with 166 lots still remaining to be finalized. A fourth phase known
as Summerfield East 3rd Addition has been submitted for County review and
depending on market conditions, is ready for finalization which includes
34 lots.
5. That no additional conditions have been recomnended by County Engineers,
Uti 1 i ti es, Hea 1 th Di stri ct and Bui 1 di ng & Safety Departments.
6. Public notice was given as required by the Spokane County Subdivision
Ordinance and no comments were received from the public.
DECISION
Based on the foregoing findings, the Subdivision Adninistrator APPROVES an
Extension of Time for three (3) years to October 1, 1989, subject to the
conditions based upon Extension of Time guidelines Chapter 3, Section "G",
Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. The conditions of approval shall remain
the same as those that have already been attach to the preliminary plat of
record.
.
D U LAS S. AD11MS
Subdi vi s1 on Admini strator
~
~
~
. RECEIVED
~RM=NAM PUa OCT ~ 1989
EXTEMICN OE TIt-E FOIRM spoKokNr
= c~Wr
P.AtwNtNG D€~MITMWr
P 1.at t~rrber; - ~7'g P ].~t Name : ~Cc
Number vf 7o't.s : 266 Na,atber of Acres: 1
Sponsor; Ken Tupper prvperty Owrer: Same
Addr+~; i E. 12929 SpragUe Adclress.
+C.i,tyr Stat{e, zip: S~okane, WA 9921.6 City, State# zip:
Phone NO: (509) 928- 1991 Phone Nos
Enqira2~er/Surv,eyvr : I n 1 and P a cif i cEng in eer i ng,f P a t Nfo ore
Address.. South 25 A1 tamont
~
City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99202
phcme NO+ (509) 535-1410
PHASED PR)JECT
~ Cct2LE"iED CNLY IF THE FLA.T IS BEING DEVEIopED AND FINAIaI ZED IN PHMES)
NLmbe-L of lut~ origi-rially approved: 266
Nuzab er Of Phas es fina 1i z,ed to c3ate: F ou r
Number of lots rerraa,rzirg to be firaal%zed: 133
Number of acres remainii-ig: 49+- Acres
PLEASE pRDVME_LS W= 'T'w FCILLaaNG ~alATICI'7
Brie~ly surm~rize the progress made, to date, in prepari,ng the plat ta be
fina Li zed (i , e, r Physica l cals t,ruction, bondirxg f or imprcveFrients, surveying
and drraftirig work, ~cccu~ushing var~QUs departin t,al requirements, obtairdng
or gra~ting easetent,s, etc. )
Thre bd5 been the cvmpl etion of fvur phases wi th a tota1 of 133 1 ots devel oped .
Remain~ng acreage is expected to develop in phas~~ havir~g 15 to 25 lots each
until campleted. . ~
~
~
N"
~ ~gla~~ant/~u~►~c~r _
/
Inland
Pacific
Engineering Transmittal
~
South 25 Altamont Spokana, WsshinQton
509 535-1410 q~~
viiD
OCf 0 5 1989
T0: Spokane County Planning Department DATE. . October 5 1989
N. 721 Jefferson Street fcGrvF COv"
Spokane, Wa 99260 DEPqq7)~I~jr
PROJECT: SUMMERFIELD EAST PE-1206-78
ATTENTION: Thomas G. Mosher
Gentlemen:
We are sending (x) enclosed under separate cover copies of the following:
Description
Bl uel i ne Pri nts Copy of Letter /X-/ Ex _P io.n of ume Form
Original Drawing Contract Documents
Work Authorization Report
No. Copies Date Description
1 Preliminarv Plat Extensinn nf TimP Form
1 Check for $100.00 for Extensipn FeP
Requested Action
Information Review & Comments Distribution
Written Approval Signature & Return
Remarks
If you have anv questions, alease do no - PsitatP t.nsnntact thi--
office. .
Sincerely,
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
1
By-
q
Patri ck J. Mootzt
~
i
L fj p ~ ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
; t
8ii0A0WAV CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
~ ; -
~ ~1, PHONE 456-2205
yA j~~' 77
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPORANC COVhiY CDUFTHOUSC
MEMORANDUM
TiO: Spokane County County Engineer
Spokane County Utilitics
Spokane County Health District
pokane County Deparnnent of Building & Safety
ire Protecrion District #1
ater Purveyor: Tnentwood Irrigation District #3
FR . homas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner
~U
DATE: October 9, 1-9 SUBJE . Extension of Time for Summerfield East PE-1206-
, ~
~
The Spokane Counry Pt&rtirig Depamnent has received the attached request for an
Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Summerfield East, PE-12()6-78.
If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional conditions should be
made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by October
24, 1989 .
Thank you.
tw
Enclosure
c: Ken Tupper
R ECEIVED
OCT 1? 1989
SPOKANE CQUNTY
PIANNING DEFARTMENT
•
i /
'C (
EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBDIVISION AOMINISTRATOR
FINDIN6S OF FACT
File No: PE-1206-78 & ZE 202-78
Name: SUMMERFIELO EAST
1. That the prel imi nary pl at was ori gi nal ly approved by the Heari ng Exami ner
Comnittee in a public hearing on January 30, 1979.
2. That the zoning upon finalization of the phases of this plat has been
reclassified from Agricultural to R-l, crossing over to UR 3.5 zoning
wi thi n the near future.
3. That the Comprehensive P18n is designated as UR6AN and is within the PSSA
area.
4. That since the original approval, the applicant has completed three phases
of Summerfield East, known as Summerfield East, Summerfield East lst and
Sumnerfield East 2nd Additions, all recorded final plats totaling 100
lots with 166 lots still remaining to be finalized. A fourth phase known
as Summerfield East 3rd Addition has been submitted for County review and
dependi ng on market condi ti ons, i s ready for fi nal i zati on whi ch i ncl udes
34 lots.
5. That no additional conditions have been recommended by County Engineers,
Uti 1 i ti es, Heal th Di strict and Bui 1 di ng & Safety Departments.
6. Publ ic noti ce wa s gi ven a s requi red by the Spokane County Subdi vi si on
Ordi nance and no corrments were recei ved from the publ i c.
OECISION
Based on the foregoing findings, the Subdivision Administrator APPROVES an
Extension of Time for three (3) years to October 1, 1989, subject to the
condi ti ons based upon Extensi on of Time guidel ines Chapter 3. Section "G",
Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance. The conditions of approval shall remain
the sdme as those that have already been attach to the preliminary plat of
record.
~ •
D U LAS S. ADAMS
Subdi vi si on Admi ni strator
~
~
. ~
( i
1
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~
BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
~ ' .
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
,
SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County County Engineer
Spokane County Utilities
Spokane County Health District
pokane Counry Department of Building & Safety
e Protecrion District #1
ater Purveyor: Trentwood Inigation District #3
4M:h0
FR ma
s G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner
DATE: October 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Summerfield East PE-1206-78
The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an
Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Summerfield East, PE-1206-78.
If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional condirions should be
made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by October
24. 1989 .
Thank you.
tw
Enclosure
c: Ken Tupper
~
v
. . ECEIVE
. ; :t : ;~4;' . • . s r; I
A, 14`0l i 1 I
zt ( _ _
_ .k;~~, ,rl~l
`M i989
PLANNING DEPMMU
PLANNING p~pp~~~j~~
BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N 721 JEFF~R~~1PP~f~~T
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
' _.~'1'~.~:,„:_'" i: n , +
. .
SPOKANC COUnTr COURT HOUSE
September 20, 1989
Ken Tupper
E. 12929 Sprague
Spokane, WA 99216
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Summerfieid East PE-1206-78
Our files indicate that your preliminary subdivision, known as SUMMERFIELD EAST
PE-1206-78 is soon to expire (October 1 st, 1989).
In order to extend the preliminary approval, you must apply for an Extension of Time
by completing the attached form. The Planning Department will review the file for an
extension and after review and comments from the County agencies will make an
administrative decision whether to approve or deny an extension. Also, the County
agencies may request additional,new conditions during their review to bring the
proposal up to current standards.
A fee of $100, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, must accompany your
application to cover the cost of the time extension request.
This certified letter will be the only reminder from our office and you must respond
by November 1, 1989. If we do not receive any response by that time, we will assume
you are not interested in pursuing an Extension for this proposal and thus the
preliminary subdivision will become NULL & VOID.
If y for an ex nsion, you will be notified when a decision is made.
T omas G. Mosher P
Senior Planner •
1P
Enclosure
c: Inland Pacific Engineering, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA 99202
►
,j
rI '~7i C i'~~l
~ ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
..{~T
rWPHONE 456-2205
jn
`''i* r r~ y iYL. -JrrD~,1Y~ i• id . 'w
r _ .
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SFOKANE COUNTY COURT NOUSE
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County County Engineer
Spokane County Utilities
Spokane County Health District
pokane County Department of Building & Safety
ire Protecrion District #1
ater Purveyor: Trentwood Irrigation District #3
FR . homas G. Mosher, AICP, Senior Planner
DATE: October 9, 1989
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Summerfield East PE-1206-78
The Spokane County Planning Department has received the attached request for an
Extension of Time to finalize the plat of Summerfield East, PE-1206-78.
If you have comments on the proposed extension or believe additional condirions should be
made a part of the preliminary plat approval, please forward comments to us by October
24, 1989 .
Thank you.
rw
Enclosure
c: Ken Tupper
REcEiv
` 1989
P L A N N I N G D P~Nr1~@I~ToU~.~,
, rv~ ~s►'A~T
~ rBROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFF~~
~ PHONE 456-2205
`
• _ _ _ _ _ '>yy SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANE GOUNTY GOURT HOUSE
September 20, 1989
Ken Tupper
E. 12929 Sprague
Spokane, WA 99216
SUBJECT: Extension of Time for Summerfield East PE-1206-78
Our files indicate that your preliminary subdivision, known as SUMMERFIELD EAST
PE-1206-78 is soon to expire (October 1 st, 1989).
In order to extend the preliminary approval, you must apply for an Extension of Time
by completing the attached form. The Planning Department will review the file for an
extension and after review and comments from the County agencies will make an
administrative decision whether to approve or deny an extension. Also, the County
agencies may request additional,new conditions during their review to bring the
proposal up to current standards.
A fee of $100, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, must accompany your
application to cover the cost of the time extension request.
This certified letter will be the only reminder from our office and you must respond
by Rlovember 1, 1989. If we da not renceive any respon-SE by that time, we will assume
you are not interested in pursuing an Extension for this proposal and thus the
preliminary subdivision will become NULL & VOID.
If y for an ex nsion, you will be notified when a decision is made.
T omas G. Mosher CP
Senior Planner
1P
Enclosure
c: Inland Pacific Engineering, S. 25 Altamont, Spokane, WA 99202
RECEIVED
PRELIMINARY PLAT OCj 0 5 1989
EXTENSION OF TIME FURM SPOKqNE COUNTy
PLANNfNG pEpqFMME1VT
.
P la t Numb er: PE -G lo "-79 P lat Name : r6Ly,,la24- --4
Nunber of Lots: 266 Number of Acres: 91
Sponsor: Ken Tupper property Owner: Same
Address: E. 12929 Sprague Address:
City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99216 City, State, Zip:
Phone No: (509) 928-1991 Phone No:
Engineer/Surveyor: Inland Pacific Engineering/Pat Moore
Address: South 25 Altamont
City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99202
Phone No: (509) 535-1410
PHASED PR(.1TECT
(TO 8E CaTLE'IED ONLY IF TI-E PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AND FINAL.I ZED IN PHASES )
NLur:.~e.L oi ~ots vcigii,aily approved: 256
NLanber of ptases f ina lized to date : F o u r
Nunber of lots renaining to be finalized: 133
Nunber of acres resnaining: 49+- Acres
PIEASE PRIJVIDE US WITH THE FpLLaJING INFpMip,TION
Briefly suYUnarize the progress made, to date, in preparing the plat to be
f ina li zed ( i. e., phys ica 1 cons truction, bonding f or improvenents, surveying
and drafting work, acccmplishing various departinental requirermnts, obtaining
or granting easemP_nts, etc. )
There has been the completion of four phases with a total of 133 lots developed.
Remaining acreage is expected to develop in phases having 15 to 25 lots each
until completed.
`b
f~
4;N-
~ S i gned•~ '
.
Applicant/SurXeyor '
A
J
~ Inland ~
Pacific
Engineering Tr nsmittal
~
South 25 Altamont Spokene, Washington
509 535-1410 99202
u
0CT 0 5 1989
T0: Spokane County Planning Department DATE. October 5 1989
N. 721 Jefferson Street p S~=x~;nr6 ~;ou~.~,
Spokane, Wa 99260 LANN~NG p"pAF,r~SNr
PROJECT: SUMMERFIELD EAST PE-1206-78
ATTENTION: Thomas G. Mosher
Gentlemen:
We are sending (x) enclosed under separate cover copies of the following:
Description
B1 uel i ne Pri nts Copy of Letter //X/ xtPnsi on nf Tima Fn.t^
Original Drawing % / Contract Documents
Work Authorization Report
No. Copies Date Description
1 Preliminarv Plat Extensionof TimP Fo-rr~
1 Check for $10 0 9 foY' Extension F_P-P
Requested Action
Information Review & Comments Distribution
Written Approval Signature & Return
Remarks
I f yo u h a ve a n v a u e s t i o n s, a 1 ea s e do no t h.e.s_.it.at.e---tQ__c..ontac.f--tp
off i ce.
Sincerely,
INLAND PACIFIC ENGIfdEERING COMPANY, INC.
-V'5
B y : ~
Natri ck J. Mootk
. ' -
,le No. PE-1206-78
Z E-202-78
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 30, 1979,
and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Ted McCoury,
dnd Chairperson, Abby Byrne.
B. P ROPOSA L ' 'The sponsor, William W. Main, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and
zone change PE-1206-78, Summerfield East, and ZE-202-78, Agricultural to
Single Family Residential for subdivision of 91 acres into 268 lots for single
family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or
representatives :
STANLEY SCHULTZ - RICHARD MASON
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the exisling land use in the area is cultivated land.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this ar•ea as residenLial.
3. That the existiny zoning of the property described in the application is
~ agricultural.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The Stale Environmeiital Policy Act)
have been complied with.
5. 7hat the proper legal requir-ements for advertisernenl of lhe Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
1
. • / ,
. ~
' .•ile No. PE-1206-78
' ZE-202-78 ~
6. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within
.
the proposed Zone Classification. 7. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area.
8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimental
to the general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety,
_ and welfare.
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed
use.
10. The following- are additionai findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That the adequate provisions have been made for school sites and
playgrounds as well as parks by the sponsor's negotiations with East
Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks and Recreation
Department. Further, that evidence at the hearing indicated that the
sponsor agreed to pursue and finalize those provisions as presented
at the hearing.
D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THlS
SUBDIVISION APPROVAL:
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended.
NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed
hereafter
~ 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on ttie preliniinary plat of record
.
and/or attached sheets as noted.
~
{
♦ I
ile No. PE-1206-78
Z E-202-78
~
✓ 2. That 'a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more
than one dwelling structure be piaced on any one lot, nor shall any lot be
further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building
sites without filing a replat.
~ 3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on
the preliminary plat of record.
✓4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property
be held in trust until the continuation of tihe streets be dedicated or
deeded: A 4' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or
border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when
streets terminate at the plat boundaries. )
✓ 5. That appropriate street names be indicated.
✓ 6~ That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved
' preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility
companies. Written ~,~yAl of the easements by the utility company must
be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
7. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved
by the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must
'also have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will
certify, prior to the filing of the final p1at, on Lhe f'ace of said water plan
that the plan is in conformance with their requirerTients and will adequately
satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be
drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
3
+
• r
rile No. PE-1206-78
Z E-202-78
The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a
copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have
been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in
accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time
schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of
the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior
to application for building permits within the plat. The contractua{
arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the
purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building
permit due tothe failure of the plat sponsor to satisfactorily complete the
approved water system.
~ The plat dedication will contain a statemenfi to the effect that the public
a water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the
local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this ptat, and the
subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire
profiection to each lot prior to sale of each lot.
8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to
the filing of the final plat.
9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to February 1, 1980.
2 10. That conditional approval of the Plat is 9iven sub1'ect to the dedication of
.
right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by
the County Engineer. 4
~
ile No. PE-1206-78
, ZE-202-78
11, That' plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline
and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer tor approval prior
to construction and tihe filing of a final plat.
12. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and
alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for
approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat.
13. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be
performed' urYder the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who
shall be responsib{e for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey
monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall
furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in
writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown
on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have
been replaced.
' 14. No construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Way
until a permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
15. All construction within the Public Right of Way is Co be completed prior to
filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County
` Engineer to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction
certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines,
shall be filed with the County Engineer.
5
• 1 , ile No. PE-1206-78
Z E-202-78
16. No direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are
constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads.
1 i. Road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for ~
rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the
developer.
✓ 18. That a name be indicaCed before the final plat is filed; such name to be
approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff.
. ,
19. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that
the plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water
district.
Special Conditions
20. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to
' 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution
No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project app4icant within thirty (30)
days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard
to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department
staff.
~1. That upon filing of the final plat, tihe zoning be reclassified to Single
Family Residential.
6
le No. PE-1206-78
. Z E-202-78
22. That •the project sponsor is responsibie for requesting a time extension to
review any preliminary plat approval.
23. That a public water system serviced, by Trentwood I rrigation District #3,
and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot.
V"" 24. That an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by
the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total
of 318 dwelling units are authorized within the plat.
. ,
25. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be
reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County
Utilities Engineer and the County Health District.
AD The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized
tl-ie use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system.
' 27. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi-
cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct
access to {ots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of
the County Engineer.
8 That no direct access be alfowed from lots to Wellesley Avenue and
`Progress Road and Forker Road.
7
~
-ite No. PE-1206-78
• Z E-202-78
(`29. That the owner dedicate 20 feet additional right-of-way along Forker Road.
L130. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at
Progress Road. Design standards 'for neighborhood co{lection arterial
should be used.
31. That the sponsor provide SO foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
,
32. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb
, -
along pathway routes as designated by fihe County Engineer, and shown on
the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue.
33. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access
center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms I rrigated
T racts.
34. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road
should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to
that road.
35. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a
fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers.
36. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence around the entire
periphery of the retainage basin in the storm drainage plan.
8
. • y -
11,e No. PE 1206-78
ZE-202-78
37. That 'the use of the park money, donated to the County by the sponsor,
be used for parks and park improvements within a two-mile radius of this
proposal.
38. That ai) construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air
Pollution Control Authority to insure - compliance with air pollution
requirements and control techniques.
39. That the sponsor install sediment basins and drywells consistent with the
Spokane Couri- ty Waste Water Management Plan.
40. That the sponsor limit the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m.
41. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curbs
(in addition to those required along the pathways) and bike paths along
the plat boundaries of Progress Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required
1 ' ~ ^ 1 V -T
' and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. ~ U~-6, ~
~ n~./~ l., ♦ ~~,Qi.ll,~j• Cl r~/u ~d.,~
42. f That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the
\ - approximately 900 feeC common lot line shared by this proposal and
property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any finalizing of any phase of
this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West Farms
` I rrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
9
- ile No. PE-1206-78
Z E-202-78
The temporary use of an individual on-site sewage system on each lot is
authorized only untii an area-wide operating sewerage system is available.
V 44. ~ Each structure from which sewage , is to issue shal) be plumbed and
connected to collector lines intended to serve the area even though use of
individual on-site sewage disposal is authorized pending availability of an
~
operating area-wide sewerage system. The plumbing shali prevent entry
1
~7'~1 of sewage into the coilector lines until authorized by the operating agency
controlling the collector lines.
~ ~ . .
45. The subdivider and persons with any interest in the property within this
plat will not protest a(ocal improvement district for sanitary sewer
improvements as may be initiafied by resolution of the governing
municipality.
146 Dry sewerage lines as approved and required by the governing
municipality shall be installed in the platted property as same is
' developed.
' 47'1 As a consideration for the acceptance of this plat by the Spokane County
~
Board of Commissioners, the owners of all non-public property herein
platted into lots, blocks or tracts agree not to protest under 36.94 or
35.43.180 RCW the construction of, or legal assessment for, any sewer
`ultimately serving their non-public property as such time it is desired by
the governing municipality to construct such sewers. The agreement
herein expressed shall be considered a covenant to run with the land and
shall be carried as a provision of each and every deed drawn to transfer
ownership of any and all property delineated within this plat.
10
~ -
. `
. - • 'le No. PE-1206-78
• ' ZE-202-78
p~ 48. The dedicatory language of the piat shall include language as indicated in
d~-
Conditions #43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 above
~
f7*' E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds
that the application of Wiiliam W. Main for a preliminary plat, Summerfield
East, and zone change from Agricultural to Single Family Residential as
described in the application should be approved.
,
Motion by ; McCou ry Seconded by : Thomas
Vote: Unanimous
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
~ ~ - airman
ATT EST :
FRED L. DAYHARSN
Planning Director
By:
11
d'
;
~ ~ .
' C hAatthew Andersen
D.fans Baltins
Robe+t P 8eschel
Chnrfes A Cleveland
(J Jflmes P Connelly
M
~ l~ ichao7 J Cronin
Ct~ Claire Cordon
f
leo J OnsCOli
L A W Y E R S F J Dullanry, sr
Lucincia S Eymnnn
SPOKANE AND EASTERN BUILDING James A f¢sh
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 Tim M Higpms
Joei C McGormick, IIi
December 8, 1980 (509)838-6131 StanlcyoMoroJo
Mithael F Nisnstedt
TELECOPIER (509) 838-1416 Lynden O Rasmussen
Josepn J Rekofhe
Stanley R SChul¢
Patr,ck A Suflivan
Lawronce H Vanco,Jr
Robert H Whatey
uenwecher D bviuiums
PetnCia C Wdliarns
1'!r . James P. Ema~.' lo Patrick H Winslon
Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Robertw Wirtston Jr
Spokane County Pro s ecut ing LeoN Cashan(5977)
Attorney' s Of f ice
West 1115 Broadway Avenue "
Spokane, Washington 99260
Re: PROPOSED SUMMERFIELD EAST DEDICATORY LANGUAGE
Dear Jim:
The language as amended in the above-referenced matter is
fine.
Very truly yours,
R ECEIVED
STANLEY R. SCHULTZ DEc 0 1-~8O
S RS / j 1 h sPoKANE cOuNnr
c c: Mr. s t eve Ho rob iows ki PlANNING DEPARTl411ENT
e
n ~
♦
DQNALD C. BROCKETT
- ~n^ . St OKANE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
CIVII DE{'ARTMENT
COUNTY - CiTY PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING WEST 1115 BAOAOWAY AVENUE
-_,rt , 1 f• ' WEST 5140 MALLON AVENUE SPOKANE, WASNINGTON 99260
SPOKANE, WASNIMGTON 99260 PHONE 456-5764
PFiONE 466-3662
JAMES P EMAClO
Chiof Gvl! Doputy
November 20, 1950
GAAALO A GESINGER
° *.a ~ ' ~ ~~t- ~t - RICHARD M GEORGE
1
- ~ ~ -QAVIDA 3ARACENO
' ' • . , , ; ~-t . -~=c'''~~'" Gvll 06pude3
SPnM<ANE COVN4r COUR7 HOUSE
R ECEIVE
NOV 2 4 ~
Mr. Stanley R. Schultz 14t►INS''ON & f~~A~.►9~AT""
Attorne~~ at La~~ j~~ ~'Wf1i`~
Spokar_e & Eastern Building
Spokane, tit7A 9 9 2 O 1
Re : Proposed Sumrnerfield East Dedicatozy Language
Dear Stan:
ThE Spokane County Planning Department has forward-
ed your correspondence dated October 14, 1980 relative to
the above capta_oned matter to our oi'fice for review and
response.
Aiter a review of your proposcd dedicatory 14nguage,
T feel certain minor changes are necessary to adequately pro-
tect Lr-uture owners of lots within the plat. Accordingly, I
uiou].d propose thE following dedicatory language be included
on the face of the plat instead of that suggested by you:
A one time fee of $58.00 per lat payable to
Spolcane County in care of the Spokane County Parks
and Recreation Department and a one tirne fee of $168.00
per lot payable to East Val1Ey 5chool District #361
shall be owing, due, and collected by the Spokane
County suilding Codes Department in addition to any
other fees of said clepartment prior to issuance of the
initial building permit for any lot. Said $58.00 fee
and $168.00 fee are each subjeet to a nine percent
(90) per annum increase each year on the annivErsary
of the final plat approval b_y the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County.
, If the above proposed language meets with your
~ approval, please contact Mr. Horobiowski, Spokane County
Plat Administrator, at your eariiest convenience.
Very tx-uly yours,
,
. ,
J . Emario
~ ~7PE : i s D'Kut rosecuta.n~ Attorne
~ ~ Y
cC< Mr. S tev-~ gorobiowski
~
~
~
~ .
,a,''~, o~' ~
C Matthew Ander&e3n
Marrs Baltirts
~ Robert P BesChe9
Charles A Clevetand
~v • James P Connelly
Mcchael J Ccun3n
Clatre Cordon
L A W Y E R S FeJ Duo118nry,,Jr
Luccnda S Eymann
SPOKANEAND EASTERN BUILDING JamesA Fish
Tim M1 Higgins
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 Jce1 C MCCormiCk III
(509) 838-6131 Stanley D Maare
Mschael F Nienstedt
TELECOPIER (509) 838-1416 Lyndon O Rasmussen
,toseph J Rekofke
S e p t emb e r 22, 19O Q PatrfCk A SulhvBn
LawronCO H Vance, Jr
Robert H Whaloy
Menwether D Wiitiams
Petricta C Wil;iems
Pahick H Wmston
Mr. S t eve Ho r ob i o s k i Raberl w winston. Jr
Subdivision Administrator LeoN Cashatt(1977)
Spokane County Planning Dept.
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99201
Re : Summerfield East Subdivision
Dear Steve:
Please f ind enclosed copies of letters to East Valley School
District and Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department.
Outlining the agreement of the developers of Summerfield East
Subdivision to contribute a fee in lieu of dedication of
, school sites and parks.
I believe the letters fully and adequately explain the agreement
of the developers in this case. At present the developers are
attempting to final plat 80 of the 266 lots approved in the
subdivision. These lots would be subject to the initial charges
outlined in the letter. The fee is to be paid as part of the
building permit application process. Those lots which are not
subject to final plat at this time are simply not subject to the
agreement. Please advise if you have any diff iculty constructing
dedicatory language to accomplish this purpose.
Very truly yours,
~
S nley . Schultz
SRS/jt
cc : Bob Fogg
w i 11 iam Ma in
enclosures - ? 3 1 Q8% 0
j : ' , _ •
•
~ ' / . . ' . , , •
. . ember 20,
. . ~ .
1344
. . - ~ ~ . . . ~ .
. - ~ : . • !~1 'N.5 ~ -
. . _
- . . . .
iFil ~ ~ .
. .Schu~t2 . .
_ R•
. . ~ , orY ~,ang'~age Att°~~eY vedicat- . SP°kane 99201 erf Bast . ~ . \
S'~Oicane' proposed Sim . . , ard .
fo~ ~
~e,par~Ent i tive • . . Y~'~`'`t~~ e~~ 1-4' 1'98~ re
t
~pear St~'n - ur~ ~or re`~iEw
. . e Sp°kan~ e aat~'~` OC ur~ o~ ~iC~~
e~
: . . a zQSp0nd~ Ca~ter . t° ° tor,~y 1an~~`=o_ •
: ~;d Y° ~ve Capt~one . o a gEa dedi a~equate ~y P I.
t~e a~g~ o£ Your F gs~,rY ` A,~~o~cc~'
~~i ~ed .
reg'~'O ~~ev~g are. la~ be ; ~ : . . .
. ter anor chan~3e~~,~in• th'~~ pl~ngua9e. a. by, .yc►u= .
1 ,~,~r~ain g o~ 1°tg aedic~t~at . sug~3'~~te . .
, 1 f ee. ovm` fo~.law ing gtead of • a a abi~ to ~ .
te~~~ ropo~e the p1a~., , e1,0t P unty Pa~'k 6a . pp .
Would 'A facs of, ~ ~ $5g ,'04 P .okane co fee o f $1
on the e f'~e ° of th'~ s~ane timo 3-ct-#361
A°ne t~ in care ent and ~~ho°~- D~st Spokane .
an~= ~~v~r~ -De~toaxE tx~ ~a~leY col~~cS , bY the , to anY
Sp a g8cr~at~' ~i~; ~`g n~ ~~dn ~~d its°n -
v►ance
. a Qr 1°t pawin~3 aUe~s D~Pa~c~en rior ta _ ai~ $58 . 4a-t ee ,
. . ~~,~1~- be ° ~,,~ing C°d ar.~n,en ari~ lot. ,5 ~ne .~Qr~e~► axY ' -
covntY 8~~.,~ of ga~'~` g~~t f°r
• Q~t t° a r anniv`~. s
athe~ ~e ~ild~,r~9 eacn svD3 e@X on t a of CountY
. . Initi$1 Y~ are ,~acr Y goar
and $168 ' ~nvm ~,r,crga ~oval by t~'e
h y°u'~ .
" ~9~'1 , per 1 P~$t aQkane ~°`~x'tY • wit
of t~'e, ~ oners °f Sg ang~~``~~ m~g aY.ane ~°~`ntY
ience•.
c°i-gsi - c. '~x°p°sed r bi°ws~i ~ . . . .
ab~v aCt La~ ,est conven ,
. 1ease 0°n at Y°ur e~`r1 tx~IY ,~ouxs r .
. apFr°val in~s~a~°r ` Ve~~ . .
. Flat . ~ F , E~`'ci ,
Dg °3.ng Attorney
. 'Pu~~ pro$ecut
. orobi-°W~'ki ~ ~ .
~B . 5teve ~ . . .
. cc : ,
~
~ Jp L I ~ E
R Y D
E
F{4LEsJIi ~.L_6}'.3' ~
0 C T 1 6 1980
G3t3r,37, A QpvGond
M'C~Ci~PF/ d;trtoa P C~:~t~?y
St~OKF~NE ~►QUNYY t~«h~:t,~.~~n
C1ai1~ CurzPs~a
pi A ~ 1~ I ~ G J E P A RT~l E~i ~ L ~ ar~ ~ ~ ~ S ~4~dr.
Lua,A;) S. £ymmin
0 c tober 14 1980 sPo~caNE AND EasTERr~ BuiLDiwG J=~-,A
' Trm cR pttaj;r,3
GPOtCtiNE, vJ,ASHINGTON 99201 ~Z~d C. YCCZ7M.sk>m
(509) 638-6131 3=~' ~f 0 na=rJ
91102al F t.t~~~~-tdt
TELEcvPiER 6509b M-oais Lqnam o_ ~~~az33n
Mr . Steve Ho r o b io ski .ta=jtlh J. RQ1=0rhe
s_anioy P, Scftuirz
S{ibd1~i-si-011 Adm?nist_atolr P3u If tfA.S11l VGn
Lc,.sUMIze W. Vangc..lr
S pokan.e Co uni:g P larzninn Depar cmer ~ ~bun m virotiv
N. 7 2 1 J e i f 2 r5 o LZ V--s-zm_8 0_ wop--m
$a'r Sts ~.r wv4tt3m
Spolcane, Washington 99201 Pa,7,511H, Win=w
~~b~~rt w. Win:ian.iT
Re : Swrmlerfield East Lea
Dear S t eve :
I'v4 di-scussed thz ma'r_tex of dedication wi-Lh Sam Angove and we
suggest the iollowing dedicatory language:
A fee of $58. 00 per lot paya'b? e, tn Spolcane Caunty
?arks aiid Recreati.oL1 and a lee of $168 . 00 per lot
payable to East Valley School Distriet #361 shall
be co:Llected by the Spakane County J3u:~lding Codes
De?ar-Lment in cadd.ition to any othcr fees o.E said
department prior to is suarice oz a building p2rlnit.
Said $58.00 fee C-Lncl $168.00 fee are subject to
a nine pErcent (9%) per anni-im increase eac-a yeai
on tlie ann?versary of the final plat approval.
I tlai-nk this ? anguage will suff ice for not orsty the pxeseat fir_al
plat of a por_ t? on of Summer C:-elaEast Subdivision but also as
successivc~ final plats are received. Please advise if you have
any; qucstions.
Vely ziu1y yo-ur s ,
Ir
PtaNTLEY R. SCIIULTZ
sRs / jln
cc : Mr. Ken Tupner
Mr. Lqil "1 ia.m NIa in
~(_'IIUL:i'G & TO )\I11 \I:I
vrroKNEYs A-r i
, 1 7 i'AliSEN HUti
. t-!~!^.;,,•,
Sr_anLt:t R. SCtit i. 1.
1'lr iJ~Lila Mia~jO''•
Spokane Count~-
Recreation
' . 1115 Braad way
okane, WA 9Q 2(D 1
. .
~
~ I'eVarding dedication ot' a paI•k :;it=j ~'~~i• t;i.~ ; ~,tr<<,~~~r:':'i.~~lci
„ _ _ ~~i ~~-i'~:~ t;. . ~i_ 1~iaL i•~ ~ i~i1.1'_ill cui~~C li. -
under the State Platting Law, Chapter 58.17 R.C.W.
r'Dr provision of a park site. The first alternative was tr)
1_;rovide land within the boundaries of the subdivision. You
,.ave indicated that your department is not interQst irl in-
"10iring and maintaining a park within the subdivision.
~ The aecond alternative is for us to pay a fee in 1 i-)i
_f such dedication. We agree to pay $58.00 per lot upol
c.losing of each lot as such a fee. The amount of a propF,r
i' ,~e is very difficult to Estimate, but the figure of
~i. ; our best effort to apportion the demands placed upor)
county parks between the future residAnts of our subdi1.,-?.;:.1-)('.
a►zd others within a two mile radiu-- pa.r?c cervj c~-
It is understood that the $58. i~,c ► j~c t; tc~ <t
per annum increase each year on the anniversary of t-3
final plat approval. It is further understood that the
$58.00 fee was calculated based upon 266 lots, and that omr
agreement to pay this $58.00 fee is specifically
~ ,
UI~ci;1 `1.1;;)2'~)trEll i:~' > lUtS toZ' t[:=~ ,;1_,11;J1v1S10li,
. i.:f-: . ~~~L i.cd
' ~ii
; ,u~,rsgc~~ed is pe,; 1.l~ ,,r aut~; ic; ~i'i';et~
to mal-,- tiii:
ol'i'er as attorney for T.D.C., Inc. and William Main Investm~2;J;
coi;':pany, joint venturers, in the Summerfield East Proj ec
r7.Aase advise if you have any question: .
iJnry tr~~lv vours ,
~ lt. ~;~'.}:il~
S R.S ; b11
cc: T.D.C., Zr.c,
~1 I~ 1a1::
, . ST4-,TE OF WASHINGTQ"
COMMISSIONER
~ BERT L. COLE
R A BESWICK
, SUPERYISOR
BOX 190
Colville, Wa 99114
Nov 7, 1978
~
Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 721 Jefferson
Broadway Centre Building
Spokane, Wa 99260
Attn: Fred Deyharsh
HARBOR
AREA
RE: Environmental Impact Statement of 5ummerfield East.
near Mr. Deyharsh:
I have reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the
, above mentioned subdivision and feel that the Department of Natural
~ Resources has no questions or comments on any part of this development,
as it does not lie i.n our fire protection area or adjacent to any
lands managed by the Department of Natural Resources.
I If I can be of further assistance please contact me.
~
~
4 Sincerely
.
~
BERT L. COL,E
Comm'rssioner of Public Lands
. `
Wal t tilrub 1 e
Spokane Local A7anager
NOrtheast Area
Z~J : b 1
cc: 1'hilip Hildebrand, Area Manager
13i.11 Boyes, Operations Forester
Ross Hesseltine, Arcadia District Manager
y
~
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNlTY EMPLOYER
. . aFicE o: N ~
Mr~ • i;" • tc ' p~'' ~ •~jA
1
A• r~ , / ~
. :w~4 ,y ~ ~'~~~t`~ ~
~ • ; • ~ y, ,;,r•
• i' ; r
' PIANf'I ING DEPARTMNf
-septefibr 9 ~ 19C7V
' . a . . . , . .
~~Ow~w~ COUwn t~Y~♦ M~Y~t
~
County IInqineer; Utilities; Henlth District;
T0: Buildinq & safety :
~ ~
FRM; Douqlas S. Adams, Subdivisi,on Adninistratar
$1BJEGT: . bctensions of Time review
. i,
The SpoJcane Comty Pl,anning irtment has reoeived the attached requests far E~ctensians of Time to finalize the pl.ats. ~
~
I f you have vomtnents an the pzcposed extersirns ar believe additional oatlditians r
should be made a gart of the paceliminary plat appzov-al, please foucward oonvents y
to us by Septenbe.r 24, 1986. ~
.
Ttiarik you.
.
E-1206-8-78 - Sump-rfield East - Ao ' - ,ki"•1~
. PN-1401A-81 - Shenandoah Forest Park Lst -'X* ,
.
PN-1427-63 - Zhe Fa.rm
PE-1414-81 - RiveYway Villa
PE-1294-79 - Vercler Road Professional Park~ .5ftA~'
~..7t 9-~~~' PE-1371-80 - Ma naoo Addition ~ Sa& F
PE-1409-81 - Hichlar~d Fstates (Monte Del Rey)-- ~"y~ «
P'N-1282-78 - Gl,enpark Additian - *o ' PI3-1284-79 - Glenede.n 5th Additian- Ve
PN-1376-80 - I3akata's 7441 lre Estates - *%o A& "
.
ptv-I377-80 - wittxopp~s 7 -Mile Estates -No A11,44*re cso»~'~"~~''"s
{
~
L1SA: dj
. ~
1 ~
.
~
~
u w
1 ` ~4 •
• 1 0
• .
- IMUtOFF icE MM •MEMoaANUM (aHEac aNE saoc) .
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGIINEL-.~L
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Dcfe September 16 1986
lnter-office Communication To Spokane County Subdivision Adrninistrator
~
from Snokane County Engineer %ff
SVbffGtTima FxtanSjnn, RPntrnetQ
Per your request, we have reviewed the files of the plats listed below. We have
no new "Conditions of Approval" to add at this time:
. .
"Ml er f- id
. Pti-1401A-81 - Shenandoah Forest Park lst PIN-1427-83 - The Farm PE-1414 81 - Riverway Vi l la
PE-1294-79 - Vercler Road Professional Park
•PE-1371-80 - Monaco Addition
PE-1409-81 - Highland Estates (Monte Del Rey)
PN-1282-78 - Glengark Addition
P1,:-1284-79 - Gleneden 5th Addition
Pl.;-1376-80 - Ivakata's 7-rti.le Estates .
P2~-1377-80 - Wittkopp's 7-bLile Estates
i
~
. . i
~
P1 at r' an(, ~ame 7E
FINAL PLAT CHECK,LIST
SEE CHECKED
I N ~ OUT COr1MENTS BY & DATE
1. Received 7 Blueline Copies and 1 Assessor's P1ap of property
! outlined in red
2. Maps Circulated to: Building Codes v Assessors ~
Treasurers wi th Assessors hlap t,,*"- Heal th Di stri ct-k/"" ~
Utilities k
3. Final Plat Leroyed and/or Legible
4. Subdivision Name
r I
~
5. Section, Township and Range ~ t$1~~
~ '
~ 6. Certificate to Plat (no older than six months)
I ~
; 7. Si gnature of l-lashi ngton Regi stered Surveyor.
~ 8. Sheet size 24 x 36.........................................
9. tJorth Arrow and Scale (50' = 1", C"O' = 1", 200 = 1")..... Zi ~
,
~ 10. Qold Boundary Line of Plat
~
11. Locati on and ari dth of Proposed stre~ts al l eys ; ri aht of~/
ways, easenen parks;~open space~`and roof spaces and streets to be dedicated to pc adjacent properties
~ 12. Street name(s)
~
13. Check 1 ot s i zes compati bl e wi th pl at aporoval & Zoni nq
Ordinance
,
~ 14. 80 ft. at building line for culdesac lots 3 ii Srj
~
~ 15. Layout, numbers and dimensions of lots and/or parcels......
ii
~ 16. Checl; dedi cati on for condi ti ons of prel imi nary pl at
approval
~
, 17. Check Restrictive Covenants for Ordinance Conflicts....... ~
18. iklumber and type of Units with Conditions of approval......
~ 19. 1 ft. strips incicated
X 20. Easement verification and illustration on Plat Map........ 3/
.
~ 21, Water Letter or Plan (with Co.Fire hlarshall sig.) , / 30
X 22. Power Letter 311d 9J1)
X 23. Phone Letter _
3 /gf
V- X-5629I.A....
X
24. Check easments, Clouds on property, etc. from ~
Certificate to Plat 41.Z!-Wf
~ 25. Check for Compliance with Shorelines Manaqements Act...... /)lh
,
,
~ 26. Existing Zoning is A4 Changed to
~ 27. Fee of ~Lj)DL` is paid?
Taxes paid? ~ 28. SEPA Notice of Action r~
t
X 29. Legal Description Proofed ( title report to dedication
30. BoCC Resolution typed and proofed
S~~~e~K
r'
D ~
;o~~r1E~~~TS : ~ _
~IA* ~
14
~J _.....1 ~ . J - ` ~ ~'U ,
♦ ~r f ~
r / L.A~If 37 .I f •
~ ~ ~ ,r..,. . t . ,
l `'•r` ~fy'`~
~ - c- ~
~
^ r ~ - '
-
~
.
lkl" - ^A toe
kt4I
.
~
' ► 3f~~~ 3,
~
R E C E I P Date ~,2_5 19 L 7799
' Received From jaw
Addressz.
r-~
,
Dollars $ /00• 'o
7
ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAIO
I l ~M ' =o~cuNa covrrr~r psArrrravo D~x~,,:y~:n;
~T. ~
ACCOIJM
I1MT. PAID I CHECK V
_JCk2~it-, dAIANCE MCINE'I B 4^ DUE ORDER Y /
- i
~ 8KS06 •
ATTENT ION : Dp~ Adam!;
~
Gentlemen:
We are sending ( rKenclosed under separate cover copies of the following:
Description
Pl~f
L/ Bl uel i ne Pri nts Copy of Letter J~ /"r/lsi1,*70
- - XtPlr n ~ IInC
L/ Original Drawing L/ Contract Documents JC/ S/ r o~fi
7
Ll Work Authorization L/ Report Cher-i yg7' ree.
No. Copies Date Description
Requested Action
Ll Information Review 8 Comnents L-7Distribution
/ Written Approval ,,_-7 Signature b Return L/
Remarks
l~~ ~'nd re%i ~~a~ PWensra~, oPc
. ~
R7 *e-
Sincerelys
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
. / .
gy :
~ Inla-id •
Pac fi(. _ Tr6nsmittal
~ Engineering
South 25 AMenwM Spokmre, lAhshieplon
509 S35-1410 99202
ro : 5?7kana (^,Vnl- DATE : Tu/ Z 3~ /98~
PROJECT: 5",4mh;ieriqe1d EQst
ATTENT I ON : DpucJ q Adnw.5
Gentlemen:
We are sending ( vKenclosed under separate cover copies of the following:
Description
L_/ Bl uel i ne Pri nts Copy of Letter
Original Drawing Contract Documents 77rn e
J/
~
Work Authorization Report 7VY -tleG
No. Copies Date Description
Requested Action
Information Review & Comments Distribution
Written Approval Signature & Return
Remarks
re%inarcf ~~afi P~enS/a~ arC
pMt 7~'rrr7 /z
C~
Sincerely,
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
By:
~
^ -
P£ELIIKIIARY PLAT
EXMMICN OF TIME MRM `
plat Nunber: PE-1206-78 plat Name; Summerfield East
Number of Lots: 266 Number of Acres: o1
Ken Tupper
Spaisor; Tupper, Inc. pZ,cperty pwner; Mercedes ,Jeske, et.al.
pddress; E. 12929 Sprague Addivs5;
City, State, Zip: Spokane, WA 99216 City, State, Zip: t.!a r•cien ,~-!A
Pbone No: 928-1991 Phone No: 349-2522
Engineei;/su-_,-e%,or: i nl an,! ?dci f i c
Adc:iress:
Clty, Stdte, Zip: SpOkar1,.:, 'l%~A 992-02
Phone No: 535-1410
PI-A.SID PPO7DCT
(M BE CC'P'SPIEI'ID ONLY IF 'I'HE PIAT IS BF•IIaG DEVEWPID AND FINALI ZID IN PHASES )
Number of lots originally approved: 266
Number of phases fina li zed to date: 3(100 1 ot s a nd 32 a c re s)
Nunbe.r of lots renaini.rx3 to be f inali zed: 166
Number of acres renain.iur3 : 59 a c re s
I
PIEASE PFCVTCE US WITH nE FOLIaIING IINFMV=CN
Briefly summarize the progress made, to dabe, in preparing the plat tA be
f inali aed (i . e., ghysical ooristruction, bondirxg f ar inprwenents, sui.veying
and drafting work, acaarQlishing variaus depaxtmental requirements, obtaining ~
or granti.ng ea.4ements, etc. )
Three phases of this project have been finalized to date, a total of 100 lot~ gn
32 acres. A majority of the platted lots have been built on. A fourth ah4a,
Summerfield East Third Addition, of 34 lots on 11.40 acres has been submitted for
checking by the County Planners and Enqineers and is readv for finalization tlhen
sponsor feeis economic conditions are suitable.
~;_e
2 f.
si
~ Appf-icant/sur'veya=
~ Transamerica- - TransemAr,ca = I
~ Title Insurance Compar
' Titfe Services Norlh 720 Argonne Roaa
Spokane, Washington 99212
(509)922-2222
C;t:1-:`1'IFIC,'A1E 1'0 PL~l-
E C .
E' V D 0 rcl
E er I Vo. L~~-117812-r1
JAN 11 1984 Certificate for Filinr,
Proposed Plat of
SPIKANF COUNTY SUMMERFIELD EAST
PLANNlNG DEPARTM
EN T
Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
S. 25 Altamont '
Spoltane, WA
Gen t 1 emen : I
In the matter of the plat suUmitted for your approval, this Company has
examined the records of the County Auditor.and County Clerk of Spokane
County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk o:E the United States
Courts holding terms in said Countv, and from such examina*ion herebv
certifies that the title to the following described land situate in ~
Spokane County, to wit:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
That portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 26 tlorth,
Range 44 E.W.M., in the County of Spolcane, State of Washington, described
as follows:
BEGINNING at the South Quarter corner of Section 35; thence
South 89°52'00" West along the South line of the Southwest
Quarter of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue
as it now exists 60.00 feet in width, a distance of 661.05
f.eet; thence North 00°OS'38" West, a distance of 30.00 feet
to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point
of Beginning of this description; thence yorth 00°OS'38"
West along the East boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms
Irrigated Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Book "0"
of Plats, page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office,
a distance of. 1121.63 feet; thence North 62°23'41" East, a
distance of 192.97 f_eet; thence North 40°31'S9" East, a dis-
tance of. 48.01 feet; thence North 65°56'49" East, a distance
of 128.00 feet; thence 5out11 46°13'24" East, a distance of
114.31 feet; thence South 23°53'S3" West, a distance of
130 . 45 f ee t; thence Soutti 12 ° Ol' 08" Eas t, a dis tance of
52.56 feet-; thence South 18°34' 40" West, a distance of
146.87 feet; thence South a distance of 910.00 feet to the
Northerly margin of tJellesley Avenue, as it now exists 60.00
feet in width; thence South 89°52'00" West along said North-
erly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point of
Beginning of this descri-ption.
(continLied)
r
Order No. LM-117812-1•1
Page 2 - PLAT CEFTIFICATE
VESTED I?V :
OLD NATIOPIAL BAr1K OF WASHINCT"1'viJ, a n~ALiollai. udnkit-►& associaiion,
Trustee under Agreement with Faye S. Elliott dated Septernber 28, 19-/- :
and MERCEnES ,TFST7. a m,=trriE'cl tti,n,^1 ~E"?,- si
-~r , . c1 LE'
E.YCEPTIOi1S -
l. General taxes as i0lluws, together with interest anci penalty, i1.
any, after delinquency; affecting this and other property:
Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due ~
35643-9017 1981 $426.11 $0.00 $426.11
1982 $424.19 $0.00 $424.19
1983 $781.09 $0.00 $731.09
1954 AMOUyTS i'lOT YET AVAILABLE
2. Assessments levied by Trentwood Irrigatton District No. 3, as follows, together witli interest and penalty, if any, after delin-
quency:
Tax Account No. Year Annual Billing Amount Paid Balance Due
35643-9017 1983 $231.00 $0.00 $231.00
3. Liabilitv for future assessments levied by Trentwood Irrigation ~
District No. 3.
4. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in
Deed dated September l, 1383, recorded October 20, 19836, as I
Document No. 946, as follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known,
or shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and
also the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for
mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and
excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, de-
vea.oping and working the same.
5. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property
herein described, as granted by Deeci recorded as Document No.
432623.
6. EASEtiIEI`1T AND THE TERl"IS AtJD COi"DTTI0iiS THEREOF :
Grantee: Spokane Valley Land & Water Co.
Purpose: Constructing and maintaining teleFhone and
electric power lines
Area Affected: Over and across said property
Dated: May 19, 1911
Recorded: Nlay 26, 1911
Recording No.: 324569
(continued)
~ . ~
. Order No, LM-117812-M
Page 3 - PLAT CERTIFICATE
7. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Seller: Old National Bank of Washington, a national
banking association, as Trustee under Agree-
ment with Faye S. Elliott dated September 28,
1972, and Mercedes Jeske, a married woman as
her sole and separate property
Purchaser: The W. Main Corporation, a Washington corpor-
ation as to an undivided 50% interest and
T.D.C. Inc., a Washington corporation, as to
an undivided 50% interest
Dated: April 2, 1979
Recorded: April 6, 1979
Recording No.: 7904060363
,
Purchaser's interest is now held of record by Tupper, Inc., a
Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50% interest and in
Bruce B. Butler and Judith A. Butler, husband and wife, an un-
divided 50% interest.
Records examinecl as to .Tanuary 3, 1984 at $:00 A.M.
TRANSMIERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
~
By :
Lar y 14attson
Title Officer
pds
cc: County Planning
County Engineers
r
.•`.ICe i /Jv , o
. J ,1 , ' ~ G ~ ~ n ~ ~ •
. -o
e~ _ ' rpA►i~~~ ^ .•e- ~ ~ ~ i~
/ ~ J ` ~ • •
43 ~lAG
~
l h c 2 n N v ~ ;I \
vw um' ~°T=7l~1if
-V
~ u.'-s~
, ~
il • ~ r 111s r7s
` • 1
` , ~
,
, 0'q
~
• , 700 ,
/ ~ • ' - ( i
~
,
T- 1T-
r
1RANSAIAEkiCA Tlll_E INSUkANCE COMPANY.
~1URTH 720 ARGONNE ROAD • ' ' -r~ . ; .
. ,
SPOKANE, WA 94206 - ~ - ~ - ~ - .o - _ R
. N
L
w 1 ,
S ~
lhis print is made solaly tor the purtase o( •s:utlng
►n Itx9ling saicy pramisrs and tt,a company issumes 1a
~
liability lor VA(IQIiVfI$ i{ any, m dimansians and
incilultl PIIa.t.Art hV dt hiai Snmy
't.. ~ -
February 3, 1983 Fi_le No. PE-1206-78
~
Findings & Order r`imerfield East
1
i
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION -
This matter having come before the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee
on February 3, 1983 and the members of the Committee present being Kathy
Carstens, Chairperson, Ron McVicker and Rich Skalstad.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, Wm. Main Corp.-TDC, Inc., is requesting approval of an Exten-
sion of Time for PE-1206-78, SUMMERFIELD EAST and Zone Change ZE-202-78,
AGRICULTURAL to R-1 for subdivision of 91 acres into 266 lots for single-
family dwellings, and there being present, the fo{lowing applicant or
rep resentati ve :
Robert Fogq
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That fihe provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with.
2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda ltem
have been fulfilled.
3. That the owners of adjacent {ands expressed neither approval nor disap-
prova) of the proposed Extension of Time.
4. That the information in the STAFF REPORT was considered.
5. That progress has been made toward finalization of this preliminary p{at.
6. That the provisions of State Subdivision 1aw establishes three (3) year
approval for preliminary piats.
D. SPECIAL EXPLANATION OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS DECISION
Those conditions as listed in the February 3, 1983 STAFF REPORT.
LP1-CC ~
~ebruary 3, 1983 File No. PE-1206-78
' Findings & Order r-rimerfield East
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the application for PE-1206-78, SUMMERFI ELD EAST and Zone Change
ZE-202-78, AGRICULTURAL to R-1 for an Extension of Time is hereby
APPF20VED to March 1, 1986.
Motion by: Ron McVicker . Seconded by: Rich Skalstad
Vote: UNANIMOUS
Kathy Carstens - Aye
Ron McVicker - Aye
Rich Skalstad - Aye
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE
FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE.
~
CKai r erson
ATT EST :
JOHN NUNNERY
Subdivision Administrator
By
DAT E :
0- qz;,
.LP1-CC 2
. ,
c ~ STAFF REPORT ~
February 3, 1983
T0: SPOKANE COUNTY SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FROM: SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF
RE: EXTENSION OF TIME for
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
PE-1206-78, SUMMERFIELD EAST
ZE-202-781 AGRICULTURAL to R1
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Sponsor 928-1991 Surveyor/Engineer 535-1410
Wm. Main Corp.-TDC, Inc. Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
E. 12929 Sprague S. 25 Altamont Street
Spokane, WA 99216 Spokane, WA 99202
Location The proposal is located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane
Valley being adjacent and between Wellesley Ave., Progress Road and
Forker Road; within
Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 EWM., Spokane County, Washington
Comprehensive Plan URBAN
History The proposal was approved by the Hearing Examiner Committee
January 1979. Two one-year extensions have been granted by the Hearing
Examiner Committee; January 2981 and January 1982. All survey, engineer-
ing design and drafting has been completed for phase-one (with 81 lots)
to be finalized. Additionally, alternative sewage disposal and drainage
studies have been completed for E.P.A. and F.H.A. regarding groundwater
contamination and environmental mitigation requirements. The delay of
finalizing this preliminary plat continues to be the current poor
economic conditions of the housing market, but the sponsor indicates a
positive tread with hopes of finalizing phase-one during 1983.
Proposal The sponsor is requesting an "extension of time" of the preli-
minary plat approval to divide 91 acres into 266 lots for single family
dwellings and to change the zoning on the 91 acres from Agricultural
to R-1.
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
The Planning Department is recommending that all preliminary plat approvals be
brought into conformance with RCW. 58.17 regarding the amount of time allowed
• before a preliminary plat must be finalized. State law currently allows a •
preliminary plat three (3) years (without any new conditions) and allows one
extension of time for one year, if the sponsor requests the additional year;
however, this 4th year may have new coaditions added.
No other additional conditions of approval are being recommended by the re-
maining departments.
►
LP1-J
11
,
STAFF REPORT February 3,__1983 PE-1206-78 ~
III. CONDITIONS
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommmended.
PLANNING CONDITIONS
Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval for three (3)
years to March 1, 1986. The applicant may request a one (1) year exten-
sion of time by submitting a written request forty-five (45) days prior
to the above expiration date. Such applications should demonstrate the
progress made toward finalizing this preliminary plat. If a time exten-
sion is not requested in a timely man.ner or a time extension is not
granted, then the preliminary plat approval is NULL & VOID.
LP1-J
12
E + ~ • ~``j~ ~ r ~ ~
rr\y
1~ . 0
~
r
fi
_ kL , 6-78
~
PE 1L 20
4
~ _ •
26278
~ ~ -
•
r ~
I
1
~f
~ li~: ~~A~ eT ~h • ~ ~ ~
~ ~ 4► ~ ~ V }r7~. ~ ~ , r ~ f
E L
6 • r4•.~~
i . ~
1 u^. r ~i C..
G~4 ~ t 1 r r O S Q
CIV ol i eY -
„ ~ h •
7D
cY., t~ . Z.~ , i J 9
~ y 1 ~ ~ Y y~ ~ ~
M1 ^'l ~ ~ ch ool
~ UP
An
CL
a E
` .
' - t ~ _ ~ - ,,,1 _ Pr~
< 4•~.,,..~c_ .~4.. ~ .j Z
T/ ~ . ,a d~, V ' , ' n
sfL►~ ~ _r~►:,,~~Ft..-~ , ~e
r e ~.~f- ~ R H 1~ ~y~ j
'7 ~ y C 1 ; ~ ~ ~ M ,
vi ~ •.~C- ~ . Q ,S +'t ~
"`.a p ~ j _ ~ f. l. P~'...~ ~ ~ ~ J
~
F;J , r ~N ' ~ ~ ' } u t' ~
r.. ---1 ~ ~ • - A16' • ~ti' `
, . .
T ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ , .
^
L 1 ~t Z ~ ~ ~~'~\t ~ 2 w``•,ti .
i:1000
R \..r r'
Q ' .
~ - p~ .
' • w .
~ v. : .
. -
~ . ZE-202-1'3
_ ,
~
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMiNER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. {NTRODUCTfON
This matter having come before the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner
Committee on January 28, 1982 and the members of the Committee present
being Jerry Williams, Chairperson, Jane Myers and Eldon Thomas.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsors, William Main Corp. & TDS, Inc., are requesting approval of an
Exfiension of Time for PE-1206-78, Surnrlierfield East and zE-202-78, Agricultural
to R-1 for subdivision of 91 acres into 266 (ots for single family dwellings and
there being present, the following applicant or representative:
ROBERT FOGG
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) .
have been comp{ied with.
2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
~ 3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disap-
provai of the proposed Extension af Time.
4. That the sponsor demonstrated that progress has been made toward
finalizing this plat.
D. SPECIAL COND{T{4N5 OR CONTINGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS EXTENSlON
OF T1ME APPROVAL:
Those conditions within the January 28, 1982 Staff Ana(ysis.
1
, File No. ~-'c - 1,!~Qc,-1 0
• - ~ ZE-202-78
I
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the application of PE-1206-78, Summerfield East and ZE-202-78 Agricultural to
R-1, for an Extension of Time request is hereby approved to February
1983.
.
Motion by: Jane Myers Seconded by: Eldon Thomas
Vote: Unanimous to Approve.
Jerry 4trilliams aye
Jane Nlyers - aye
Eldon Thomas - aye EARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
.
ai son
ATT EST :
JOHN NUNNERY
Subdivision Adminis rator
B y
v ~
DAT
2
. • ' -
- AGENDA, January 28, 1982 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNINU SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER C0MMITTEE
TIME: Thursday, January 28, 1982 - 9:00 A.14. ( Item #1 on Morni ng Agenda)
PLACE: aroadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ANO ZONE RECLASSiFICATION - EXT~111SiOPJ OF TIME
PE-1206-78, SUP1MERF IELD EAST ZE-202-78, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1
a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the
Spokane Valley adjacent to and north
of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road
and east of Bannen Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 EWM
That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section
35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEIy of
Forker Road and SWIy of the power line easement as recorded on
January 19, 1943, under Auditvr's File No. 572309A; Also the
E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said Section; And also that portion
of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SWIy of said
power line easement; Except the Spokane Ualley Land &Water
Company's canal right-of-way; And except commencing at the SW
corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; thence east
along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 ft; thence
north a distance of 933.42 ft; thence west a distance of 700 ft;
thence south a distance of 433.42 ft.•to the south line of said
•Section 35; thence east along the south line of said section a
distance of 350 ft. to the point of beginning. And except
Wellesley Avenue; And except that portion of the NW 1/4 of said
section lying within Plat 71T4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per
plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51.
c. Soonsors: W.Main Corporation & TOC, Inc.
E 12720 Nora Avenue E 12929 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99216 Spokane, WA. 99216
d. 'tngineer: I.P.E.C.
E 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, Wi4. 99216
e. Site Size: 91 acres
f. Number of Lots: 266
g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural
i. Proposed Zoning: R-1
j. :Jater Source: Trentwood Irrigation Distr.ict #3
k. School District: East Valley #361
1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non- •
significance (a preliminary decision,
which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an
EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This in-
sures the applicant of a timely processing or his/her proposal at
the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the
public hearing is to afford the opport-unity to presen± the
I
1
. •
PE-1206-78, Sl1MMERFi ELD EAST
decision makers with information as to whether ur not apntential SIGNFICANT
ADVERSE impact upari the physical environment will resul°t frvm imp7ementation
of the proposal,thus resul ti ng in the need for an EIS. However, a71
'"extensions of time" and mvst "change of conditions: are exempt from the -
rovisions of SEPA, check with the Planning Department staff 1f uncertainty
P
exists.
n. App 1icant is requesti ng a Time Extensi an unti 1 February 1, 1983.
I
d
1 ~
fo i
~ ~ x, ~
,
'~~+y
V R 0 ~ .
i
I►~ ,r~~"''~ ►
i ~ ~ ~J
~ i
'A ~ ❑ S ~ C ~
ViaG I ey Va I ivY
J r w M iq h
cnrWc~o", ~:.ncaI
~ Iir LYI i, sat ~ I WEJ.,LE5L.
~
~ il • _ - ~ ~F r i°' y
~ ~ ito St y j~ .
7 L z
- ~ 4 nf
1 a 2 . ~
+ `~#*f~~ ~ r ,ir ^1 -
~ %
q1 p•".}ir
s t+•~ F f ; . r.! .i.►r ~ ~ .l~ 0
r w+r
j ~ •i~as -y t
~ f~ ~ ' ~ • ~
r
~ a ~ A y~ C~ • ~
. ' +a~ r ~ 4 { N' ' i • . Y~ ~ ~
_ I ~ - e E' ~ L • i~' . . I~ . . . r.i , ++t y~ J•
~~~yf6 r ~ i~•Y~~i,~~ ~
!"i -6.o
~ drl ~ i a • ~ i ~
~ ~~eAJ , • , . . . _ ~ ~ .
f
. . e ' ~
~ - . .
a ~i~
~fp'E
1 A
■
STAFF ANALYSIS - January 28, 1982
PE-1206-78, SUtrIlrlERFIELD EAST
ZE-202-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1)
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AVD ZO'JE RECI aSSIFTC_"~T70N - EX'?'ENS 7~~~^~ r;r T r~'rF
I. GESERAL T ~+rr. r~ n r ~ r• > -
A. Hi:
The proposal was approved January, 1979, and given a one-year time
eatension on January, 1981, by the Subdivision Hearing Examiners
Committee. The proposal is to be phased. To date ao phase has been
~_nalized. The sponsor has worked with the school district to
itisfy conditions of approval and has worked with F.H.A. regarding
,-thod of sewage disposal. Other studies, reports, design work,
rafting, and surveying has been accomplished; however, the current
~lowdown in residential construction has complicated immediate
-iaalization of the first phase. The sponsor is therefore request-
i_r_g a time a:{tensioa until Febrtiary 1, 1983.
B. ~ocatioa
The Trentwood area af the SpoKane Vailey, more specificaiiy, adjacent
to and aorth of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, souLh of
Forker Road aad east of Ban.nen Road.
C. Proposal
- 91 acres subdivided into 268 Lots for single family use
- Lot frontage = 80'
- Lot sizes = 10,000 sq. ft.
- Phase - one = $I Lots
II. SPECItLL INFORMATION
No additional conditions of approval are being recummended by the various
departments.
III. CONDTTIONS
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended.
PI.ANNING DEPARTMENT
1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
That a time extensioa be gr3nted to February 1, 1983
~
1':
MM"
• IE No. PE-1206-78
Z E -202-78
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 29, 1981,
and the members of the Committee present being John Culler, Chairperson,
Kathy Carstens and Ted Mccoury.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsors, William Main Corporation and TDC,' Inc., are requesting approval
of an Extension of Time and Zone Change, PE-1206-78, Summerfield East and
ZE-202-78, Agricultural to R-1 for subdivision of 91 acres into 266 lots for
single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or
representative:
ROBERT FOGG AND DICK MASON
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Envir-onmenta! Policy Act)
have been complied with.
2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis-
approval of the proposed Extension of Time.
4. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That reasonable progress has been made toward finaliZation of phases
of the plat and therefor-e the Extension of Time should be granted.
D. SPECIAL CONDITI4NS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS
EXTENSION OF TIME APPROVAL:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to
review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may
subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing
Agencies.
3. That a time extension be granted to February 1, 1982.
I
1
+ ~ • e No. PE-1206-78
. ZE-202-78
ENGINEER DEPARTMENT
1. This preliminary plat is subject to the provisions of Attachement "C" - Fee
Schedule Office of the County Engineer - pursuant to Board of County
Commissioners Resolution #80-1592 of December 22, 1980.
UTI LITI ES DEPARTMEN"f
' 1:Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418,
the use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authoriied. This
authorization is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of
the Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject
to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health
District.
2., The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any
J petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local
improvement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
The owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or
protest any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district
(ULID) established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County.
~
Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-
wide collection systems. w,,,~ ?
,7 .
5. A dry sewer system is to be constructed: Plans and specifications for the
f
dry sewer have been reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department.
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that
the application of William Main Corporation and TDC, Inc., for an Extension of
Time, Summerfield East and Zone Change as described in the application should
be approved.
Motion by: McCoury Seconded by: Carstens
Vote: Unanimous to Approve (3-0)
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
~
+ Chairperson
~
,
~
ATTEST:
WALLIS D. HUBBARD
Planning Director
01 BY :
Date:
~ AA'e No. PE-1206-78
ZE-202-78
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Exarniner Committee on January 29, 1980
and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairperson,
Ted McCoury and John Culler.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, W. 'Main Corporation, is requesting approva{ of an Extension of
Time and Zone Change, PE-1206-78, Summerfieid East and ZE-202-78, Agricul-
tural to Single Family Residential (R-1) for subdivision of 91 acres into 266 lots
for single family dwellings and there being present, the following applicant or
representative :
R{CHARD MASON, ENGINEER REPRESENTING SPONS4R
C. FJNDINGS OF FACT
1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmenta! Policy Act)
have been complfed with.
2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
3. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis-
approval of the proposed Extension of Time.
4. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing I
Examiner Committee: -
a} Progress has been made toward finalizing the plat.
1
,
A` ' No. PE-1206-78
ZE-202-78
D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR CONTIGENCIES APPLICABLE TO THIS
EXTENSION OF TIME APPROVAL:
1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting an Extension of
Time to review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied
for may subject the project sponsor to new conditions required by
Reviewing Agencies.
3. That a Time Extension be granted to February 1, 1981.
E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds
that the application of W. Main Corporation for an Extension of Time,
PE-1206-78, Summerfield East and Zone Change as described in the
appl ication should be approved.
Motion by: Culler Seconded by: McCoury
Vote: 3-0
HEA;NG EXAMINER CO ITTEE
Chairman
1
/
/
/
/
ATT EST :
FRED L. DAYHARSH
Planning Director
B y :
2
~
/
,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 ._FFEF~SON STREET
• ~ ~ ti ~ ~ j~
~PHONE 455-2205
~ • .
i II I...
_ . SPOKANE, WASMINGTO`4 99260
sp,~-.„E C~UNTr «.~RT NoJsE December 5, 1980
The W.Main Corporation
E 12720 Nora
Spokane, WA. 99216
RE: PE-1206-78, Summerfield East
Dear Sirs:
Our files indicate that the conditional approval on your pre-
liminary plat, known as Summerfield East, will expire on
February l, 1981. The Hearing Examiner Committee must consider
and approve, in a public hearing, an application for an Extension
of Time if your preliminary plat is to remain active. The
Committee may attach additional conditions to the plat during the
public hearing.
In order to process an Extension of Time, we request that you
complete the attached form and return it no later than December 29,
1980. A fee of $75.00, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer,
must accornpany your application to cover the cost of the public
iiearing.
If I can be of any hel p to you, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~~~►,oUC ~ `
Steve P. Horobiowski
Subdivision Administrator
Enclosure
SPH/dj
CC: I P E C
E 12720 Nora
Spokane, WA. 99216
J
' • le No. PE-1206-78
' Z E-202-78
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FINDINGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 30, 1979,
and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Ted McCoury,
and Chairperson, Abby Byrne.
B. PROPOSAL
The sponsor, William W. Main, is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and
zone change PE-1206-78, Summerfield East, and ZE-202-78, Agricultural to
Single Family Residential for subdivision of 91 acres into 268 lots for single
family dweltings and there being present, the following applicant or
representatives :
STANLEY SCHULTZ - RICHARU MASON
C. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the ar-ea is cultivated land.
2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as residential.
3. That the existiny zoning of the property described in the application is
agricultural.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmetital Policy Act)
have been complied with.
S. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfilled.
1
• , ~
• ile No. PE-1206-78
ZE-202-78
6. That the land in this area is suitabie for the praposed use, or uses within
the proposed Zone Classification.
7. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area.
8. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use is not detrimentaf
to the general purpose or otherwise harmfull to the public health, safety, -
and welfare.
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed
use.
14. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing
Examiner Committee:
a) That the adequate provisions have been made for school sites and
playgrounds as well as parks by the sponsor's negotiations with East
Valley School District and the Spokane County Parks and Recreation
Department. Further, that evidence at the hearing indicated that the
sponsor agreed to pursue and finaliZe those provisions as presented
at the hearing.
D. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OR C4NTIGENCIES APPLICABLE 70 THIS
SUBDIVISION APPROVAL:
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended.
NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed
hereafter
~ 1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of record
.
and/or attached sheets as noted.
?
le No. PE-1206-78
' ZE-202-78
✓ 2 That 'a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more
than one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be
further subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building
sites without filing a replat.
That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on
. ~
the preliminary plat of record.
LZ4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property
be held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or
deeded : A I' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or
border the plat boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when
streets terminate at the plat boundaries. )
✓ 5. That appropriate street names be indicated.
That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved _
' preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility
companies. Written app,rnyof the easements by the utility company must
be received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
7. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved
by the water supplier and fire protection distr•ict. Said water plan must
also have been appr-oved by the appropriate health autl~or~ities . The health
authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will
certify, prior to the filing of the final plat, on the face of said water plan
that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately
satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be
drafted on a transparency suitable for reproducLion.
3
• _ .-ile No. PE-1206-78 j
Z E-202-78
The purveyor wili aiso certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a
copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangemenis have
been made with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in
accordance with the approved plan, and in accordance with a time
schedule. The time schedule will provide, in any case, for completion of
the water system and inspection by the appropriate health authorities prior
to application for building permits within the piat. The contractual
arrangements will include a provision holding Spokane County and the
purveyor harmless from claims by any lot purchaser refused a building
permi( due to the failure af the plat sponsor to satisfactorily comptete the
approved water system.
✓ The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public
~ water system as approved by County and State Heatth authorities and the
local fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the
subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire
protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot.
8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to
the filing of the finaf plat.
9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approva{ to February 1, 1980.
~ 10. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of
.
right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the pfat by
the County Engineer.
4
ile No. PE-1206-7$
+ Z E -202-78
11. That' plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centeriine
and corb gr~jde~ bi2 suhinilted tu tht> Count~ Engineer tor oppt'ov~-,1 pr'iur'
to construciion arici tfie f iling of a f inal pIal.
I
12. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and
alignment of drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for
approval prior to construction and the filing of a final plat.
~
13. Construction within the proposed public streets and easernents sl-iali be
performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who
shall be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey
monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall
furnish the County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in
writing that all improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown I
on the approved construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have
been replaced.
' 14. No construction work is to be performed within the Public Right of Wa~y I
until a per•mit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is
subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
15. All construction within the Public Right of Way is [o be completed prior to
filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County
j-Engineer to cover the cost or construction of improvements, construction
certification, "As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines,
shall be filed wiih the County Engineer.
J
~ ,le No. PE-1206- i
ZE-202-78
16. No direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are
:I~=_-lP(i t'.~ ~c?:lflt_~, ~ilrf~li~~r, d~ cf~~l l~ E~ - lLIc?~-
,
~ i. L] g !'cll.J lf ig f iiiQ;L~ui i~ o I iLi la;i}'
rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the resporit, i l_) I i i t`~ t 1-,12
developer•.
~ 18. I hal a narne be iridicated betore the firial plat is filecl; i)r,
anprovacl h~., the Cotintv Assessor anci thP P(anninci staff
19. Prior lu filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present eviden%_-
V•,`~ff~~(-~ tf}r~ e:'~~r- ~~C~~ _-_F_'f V~ICF' ~9rf'~^ nf ~f1~~ ~ir•,.'~~~. E.. 1~cii
_ .
Special Conditions
20. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant t:
~ 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolutic~f~,
No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (3C,!
days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regar(I
to the preliminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Departmer
staff.
'7~1. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Single
Family Residential.
6
. le No. PE-1206-78
ZE-202-78
2cl-. 1 hat tlie project sponsar is responsible for reyuestiny a tiriic, e:,tension to
review any preliminary plat approval.
23. That a public water system serviced by Trentwood I rrigation District #3,
and including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot.
V 24. That an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by
the Health Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total
of 318 dwelling units are authorized within the plat.
25. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be
reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County
Utilities Engineer and the County Health District.
✓R6) The dedicatory language of the plat will state that tach lol is authorized
the use of an individual on-site sewaye disposal system.
' 27. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifii-
cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct
access to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of
the CoLinty EnyinEer.
8 I-hat no direct access be aflowed frorli {ots to `ti'ellesley Avenue and
'Proyr-ess Roaci arid Forker Road.
7
. •
ile No. PE-1206-78
• Z E-202-78
(/29. That the owner dedicate 20 feet additional right-af-way along Forker Road.
L130. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at
Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood col lection arterial
should be used.
31. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
- r
32. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curb
along pathway routes as designated by the County Engineer, and shown on
the preliminary plat of record, and along Wellesley Avenue.
33. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access
center of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms I rrigated
T racts .
34. That the sponsor assume responsibility for reconstruction of Progress Road
should flooding, caused through activities of the plat, cause damage to
that road.
35. That the stub roads to the west be barricaded, by the sponsor, in a
fashion acceptable to the Spokane County Engineers.
36. That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence around the entire
periphery of the retainage basin in the storm drainage plan.
8
• ~ il,e No. PE-1206-78
, .
ZE-202-78
37. That 'the use of the park money, donated to the County by the sponsor,
be used for parks and park improvements within a two-mile radius of this
proposal.
38. That all construction will be monitored by the Spokane County Air
Pollution Control Authority to insure compliance with air pollution
requirements and control techniques. I
39. That the sponsor install sediment basins and drywells consistent with the
Spokane County Waste Water Management Plan.
40. That the sponsor limit the construction activities from 7:00 a.m. to
6:00 p.m.
41. That the sponsor provide and construct 6 foot sidewalks excluding curbs
(in addition to those required along the pathways) and bike paths along
the plat boundaries of Progress Road, and Wellesley Avenue as required
,
' and approved by the Spokane County Engineer.
~ ~ = ~ F~l-..~ / (,..~J~~ ` L/, ~ ~11~~ ~l1-.-+ u W • C!'•-`C ' ' A ` ~
~
4That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence along the
~ - approximately 900 feet common lot line shared by this proposal and
property owned by Tony Danelo, prior to any finalizing of any phase of
this project. Mr. Danelo's property is legally defined as West Farms
- I rrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
~
9
' • -
-ile No. PE-1206-78
ZE-202-78
The femporary use of an individual on-site sewage system on each lot is
±
authorized only until an area-wide operating sewerage system is available.
V ~ 44. ~
~connected LO colfector lines intenduu i.v ~c;t'L c LiiU d; ULJ Lviii;i I,;ujf ~ ~~~U %Ji
individual on-site sewage disposal is authoriied pending availability of an
~
operating area-wide sewerage system. The plumbing shall prevent entr%
~
~1 of sewage into the collector lines until authorized by the operating agency
`W r controlling the collector lines.
~
.
1 45. -fhe subdivider and persons with any inter•est in the property within thi >
,
L
plat will not protest a local improvement district for sanitary sewer
fclf-I I:IcitE`ij i~~ fC'.`, ~l!j._;Ii ~<< .~i_• lj?\.`_.(I1!i;
U I I t
;ls /46 Dry sewerage lines as approved and required by the governing
~
municipality shall be installed in the platted property as same is
~
' developed.
~
;
47t As a consideration for the acceptance of this plat by the Spokane County
I
Board of Commissioners, the owners of all non-public property herein
platted into lots, blocks or tracts agree not to protest UTirlpr 36.94 or-
35.43.180 RCW the construction of, or legal assessment i-~
',)1~ ~r"\ i f~:l'.!(ilf.i ! i. >~•t.`. i_lt'ril- t I- -~~-.r~ i.~
herein e> , .
shall be :.ji-r►cU d~ ci pruvi5iun u~ CcILti c)iILI UvU ry vc~' L;
ownership of any and all property delineated within this plat .
10
~ •
~ 'le No. PE-1206-78
• _ Z E-202-78
48. The dedicatory language of the plat shall include language as indicated in
Conditions #43, 44, 45, 46 and 47 above I
~
~
^ E. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds
that the application of William W. Main for a preliminary plat, Summerfield
East, and zone change fr-om Agricultural to Single Family Residential as
described in the application should be appr-oved.
Motion by : McCoury Seconded by : T homas
Vote: Unanimous
HEARING EXAMtNER COMMITTEE
~ . ~
~ ai rman
ATT EST : ~
FRED L. DAYHAF2Sfi
Planning Direccor
.
By.
l •
I
11
'SPOKANE COIINTY AUD I TOR
' ~ ~ , r!FF.
6S6 ;,::E~.~.~•~
- _ . ~4C>•}IlUti2'~ Fi~ED ' ;,,r,; .
~ r ~ rt , ; . . - - - ,
Plannin,,
AFii ! I l I
5I,r~ ;w- ~]~~I~.L~..~'. r~iUDI-TV `
TITLF NOTICE SPOKa~.~^ , ~
c,OL
N T Y. WAc r1; .
~ c -FtirY
"6-FT. FENCE" ,
SPCRAnC _DJti7r-::~Q-H._L 5F CONVENANT
,
ifidt tfle De i Ow pruv i~,iuns Ji i.h i 5 C••(,. rCii~Ci,Gvcrldt►i:. 5I7a I, ctNpiy cii .l1e
fol 1 cwi ng aescri bea property,
:
SUMMERF I ELD EAST
That portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 2E North,
kange 44 E. W. M., i n the County of Spok ane , State of Wash i ngton , descri bea
as follows:
BEGINhING at the South Quarter corner of Section 35; thence
South $9'52'00" West along the South line or the Southwest
4uarter of said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue
as it now exists 60.00 feet in width, a distance of 661.05
feet; thence North 00005'38" West, a distance of 30.00 feet
to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point
of Beginning of this description; thence North 00°G5`38"
West along the East boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms
Irrigateo Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Book "0"
ofi Plats, page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's Office,
a distance ot 1121.63 feet; thence North E2JZ3'41 " East, a
distance of 192.97 feet; thence north 40°sl'59" East, a
distance of 48.01 feet; thence north 65°5E'49" East, a
distance of 128.00 feet; thence South 46°13'24" East, a
distance ot 114.31 feet; thence South 23°53'S3" West, a
oistance of 130.45 feet; thence South 12°O1'08" East, a
aistance of 52.56 feet; thence South 18°34'40" West, a
d-+stance of 146.87 feet; thence South a distance of 91G.00 fee-L
to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as it now exists
60.00 feet in width; thence South 89052'00" West along said
Northerly margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point
of Qeginning of this description.
'vINEkEAS, wi th i n January 30, 1975 Fi nd i ngs ano Clraer the Heari ng
Examiner Corrnnittee added the following condition-of-approval to the
Preliminary Plat - "Summerfield East" PE-1206-78:
That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink fence
al ong the approximately 900 feet common 1 ot 1 i ne shared by
this oroposal and property owned by Tony Danelo, prier *_o
any finalizing of any phase of this project. Mr. Danelo's
property is legally aefined as West Farms Irrigated Tracts
Plat f~4, 8locks ll:s ano 112, and
hHE:f.'.~n:;, triC dbOV(: Salr CUf1CilLlufl ,s dfl at'i_°fl!,t ;,C: .1"C%-eCt ~rC:
property interest of Tony I.Ianel o, an(i
WhEREAS, the first phase "Summerfield East" will require construction
and surface improvements to the site, which could damage said fence, and
.
~ -
. ~
TITLE NOTICE
116-FT. FENCE" COVENANT - Final Plat - SUMMERFIELD EAST Page 2
WHEREAS, the sponsor has submitted the two lowest bids of three, the
greater being $3,267.29 for total of 870 feet of 6-ft. chainlink fence, and -
WHEREAS, the sponsor of "Summerfield East" has provided assurances
that said 6-f t. fence will be constructed pursuant Washington Trust Bank -
Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 698 dated March 29, 1984 f or the amount of
$4,000 with Spokane County Planning Department release being required, and
WHEREAS, said Letter of Credit does provide assurances that the fence
will be constructed and the below stipulations will assure said fence
improvements will be made prior to issuance of any building permit for any
residential lot of "Summerfield East".
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of Spokane County approving
the Final Plat of "SUMMERFIELD EAST", the Spokane County Planning Department
does hereby add the following covenant to all residential lots within the
property legally described above, as provided for hereinafter:
1. That no building permit shall be issued on any residential lot within
Final Plat - SUMMERFIELD EAST until said 6-ft. fence is installed
pursuant Condition #42 of the January 30, 1979 Hearing Examiner
Committee Findings and Order and until said Letter of Credit is
released by Spokane County Planning Department; except when the plat
sponsor is requesting building permits with written approval from Mr.
Tony Danelo.
2. That all provisions of this covenant shall remain in full force and
effect on all property owners, heirs and assigns of said residential
lots of SUMMERFIELD EAST until Spokane County Planning Department
extinguishes this 6-f t. f ence covenant by f iling f or public record
with the Spokane County Auditor a document entitled, EXTINGUISHMENT
OF 6-FT. FENCE CONVENANT, which includes:
a) the same legal desciption as this document,
b) a statement that references the County Auditor's filed document
number of this document and declares this document as being
extinguished, and
c) a notarized signature of appropriate Spokane County Planning
Department off icial or other applicable off icial having "lead
agency" jurisdiction.
DATED THIS _1/ 111DAY OF , 19
8A~.
S okane ou ybdivisio Administrator
~ f 1984.
5UBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day o
„
.;,Ll ,
. , .
Notary Public in and f or the State of Washington, residing in Spokane -
2
~
!
1 t Mr. John Nunnerv ~
~ C E V F ~ i
SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
APR,1 N►9b4 nonaia c. srockea
County ~ City Public Safety Bullding
~ }V JY Weat 1100 Mallon Avenue
~ M E N I
` a H L Spokane, Washington 99260
(509) 456'3G62
A ril 101984
_~4 P ►
i.- CRIMINAL DIV1S10N
Counry•City Pubiic Safety Bldg.
W. 1100 Mallon
Spokanc, WA 99160
(so9) 456•3662 East Valley School District No. 361
North 3415 Pines Road
FREnJ.cARUSO Otis Orchards, WA 99027
Chiet Dcpury
Dsputiea Re: Finalization of a Portion of Summerfield I
C1uk D. Colwel I E a S t P1 A t !
Ntricia A. Thompson I
AUen M. Gauper Gentlemen : ~
Robert P. Kingaley
PaulE.Smith Ken Tupper, developer, in conjunction with ;
t~~n~ra L. s.y~t the Summerf ield East Plat, is in the process of finaliz-
Rlchard T. Pl~tt PfiillipJ. Wetzel ing a portion of the same. ~
C. Bndley Chinn
Strphen R. Matthews In con j unct ion with the approval of the pre-
Ronald W. Skibbie 1 iminary plat, the developer proposPd that a one t ime
SamF.Cou. fee of $168. 00 er lot be a able to the East Valle David J. Carlson p p y y
Ronald P. Aricills School District No. 361 and shall be owing, due and ~
wuiB.MjCk collected by the Spokane County Building Code Department ;
n.AiatoaFnncis.Jr. prior to the issuance of an initial building permit for
any lot. The $166.00 fee was subject to a 9$ per annum
J~venileDepait~nenr increase each year on the anniversary of the final plat
w.1208Msllon approval by the Board of County Commissioners.
spotane, wA 99260
(sM) 456-6046 On April 3, 1984, the Board of County Commis-
Deptrties sioners approved a portion of the Summerfield East Plat.
NorrisV. Barnhill A special covenant was recorded in the Spokane County
NeU H. Korbas Auditor' s Of f ice including among other conditions, the
DennisJ . o•snee above referenced condit ion concerning the East Val ley
School District.
CiVIL DtVISION
w. iiissrwdW.y Although Spokane County is cognizant of the
sPokam.wA9926o fact that it would be very difficult for East Valley
(5o9) 456-5764 School District No. 361 to collect a$168.00 fee prior
to the issuance of any building permit on any lot with-
JAMES P. EMAC10 in a portion of the Summerf ield East Plat f inalized ,
ChlefDePuty Spokane County does not feel that it should incur any
Deputies liability of any kind or nature whatsoever in the event
Gnrald A. Gesingrr
David A. Saracena
Robert B. Hingcr
• w
~
, East Valley School District No.-361
April 10,1984
; Page Two
I
~
that the building permit is issued and the $168.00 is
not collected.
Accordingly, pursuant to this correspondence,
Spokane County is offically notifying East Valley
School District No. 361 that, pursuant to the approved
special notice filed in conjunction with a portion of
the finalized Summerfield Plat, Spokane County through
the Spokane County Building Code Department will
attempt to collect and transmit to Edst Valley School
District No. 361,1$168.00 in conjunction with the
issuance of the initial building permit for any lot
within the approved preliminary plat. The $168.00
figure will be subject to a 9$ per annum increase each
year on the anniversary date of the finalization of
, that portion of the plat. In the event, for some reason,
Spokane County should neglect or fail to collect such
amount of money, Spokane County will assume no respon-
sibility or liability of any kind or nature whatsoever.
Should the school district be in disagreement
with the provisions of this correspondence, I would
request that the district immediately contact the
undersigned so ttiat the County may appropriately adjust
; the dedicatory language to reflect the desires of the
~ district. Presumably such modification would remove
Spokane County from any responsibility whatsoever in
collecting and /or transmitting the $166.00 fee to the
district.
Very truly yours,
James F. Emacio
JPE:is Chief Civil Deputy
~
cc: 'Mr. John Nunnery
Mr. Stan Schultz
.
. i
'
,.w
'li':''' Nt;~;"I~
1 . . ~
~
• ,
~ ~ ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
N ~~i~ • i~"-aOWAY CENTRE BUILOING N?2' JF7:c:;c--N S'•F:ET
;~i il ~'~T_' , u ~ PHONE 456-2205
,,a~', a " ~ ' . L~E~ ~ 1 •
'7~~ ~ 4'•1 ~.i~ll I~A • ' ; ~
SPOKAfJE, WASHINGTON 99260
. ;c- • . . , _
SPOKAhC COUryTY C01,jR7 HCUS!
Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
S.25 Altamont St.
Spokane, WA. 99202 July 23, 1984
Dear Mr. Calkins, '
Regarding your letter of July 10, 1984 requesting the release of the "Letter-of-
Credit" for the guarantee to construct the chainlink fence associated with the
f i 1 ing of Summerf ield East Final Plat, Please f ind said letter enclosed.
Building and Safety Department indicated that the f ence has been installed and
the conditions of approved have therefore been complied with.
Thanks for your assistance
in this matter, ohn Nunne y
Spokane County Subd. Adm .
L
cc: iSumerf ield East Fi le~1
Was ng16n`Trust--'~ank - Leonard C. Decker
encl: "Original" - Irrevocable Letter of Credit No..698 by Washington Trust Bank
Ma rch 29, 1984
$4,000.00 I
. .
Illr ~
Vl'd'Sh1ngton TI'USt Bank IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT M0. 698 ~ DATE: March 29, 1984
AMOUPIT: $4,000.00
Leonard C. Decker
Vice Presidenr
Spokane County Planning Departn►ent
West 1116 Broadway
Spokane, Washington 99201
Gentlemen:
We hereby establish our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 698
in your favor for the account of TUPPER, INC., East 12929
Sprague, Spokane, Washington 99216, up to the aggregate amount
of FOUR THOUSAND AND NO/100-----Dollars (g4,000.00) U. S.
currency, available by your draft(s) drawn and presented to
the Washington Trust Bank, and accompanied by the following:
Written request by the Spokane County Planning
Department to the Washington Trust Bank indicating
non-completion of all or any of the improvements
to Summerfield East, and the amount of money required
to complete such improvenients.
This Letter of Credit is assurance of completion of installation
of a Cyclone Fence along portions of the West boundary of
the platof Summerfield East. Spokane County Planning
Department will return the original Letter of Credit when the
work has been satisfactorily completed.
All drafts presented under the credit must contain the clause
"Drawn under Washington Trust 6ank Letter of Credit No. 698."
Any and all banking charges, if any, other than those of the
issuing bank, are for the account of the beneficiary. We
hereby engage vrith the drawers and bona fide holders of drafts
drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Letter of
Credit that the drafts will be duly honored upon presentation
and delivery of documents, as specified, to Washington Trust
Bank, P. 0. Box 2127, Spokane, Washington 99210
All drawinys under this credit will be governed by the Uniform
Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Washington.
ketws-vw 011Y , Sincerely,
s&, p4ot-llt , ,
eonard C. Decker
~ Vice President
LCD/cg ~3/
r
Washington Trust Financial Center P.O. 8ox 2127, Spokane, Washington 99210 (509) 455-3897
i
~
,
' .
'ttffz~I
, S
, " t ce e
t , ~ I'I ♦ ` y ` .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N, 721 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASNINGTON 99260
• . '
SPOKANE COUfVTY GOURT HOUSC
Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
S.25 Altamont St.
Spokane, WA. 99202 July 23, 1984
Dear Mr. Calkins, '
,
Regarding your letter of July 10, `1984 requesting the release of the 'Letter-of- '
Credit" for the guarantee to construct the chainlink fence associated with the
f i 1 ing of Sumnerf ield East Final Plat, Please f ind said letter enclosed.
Building and Safety Department indicated that the f ence has been installed and
the conditions of approved have therefore been complied with.
.a
Thanks for your assistance
in this matter,
ohn Nunne y
Spokane County Subd. Adm .
cc: SuMerf ield East Fi le
/
D40
"W3
1111
WashiiVonTrust Bank I RREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT h0 . E98
DATE: March 29, 1984
Leonard C. Decker AMOUNT: $49000.00
Vice Presidenf ~
Spokane County Planning Department
West 1116 Broadway
Spokane, Washington 99201
Gentlemen:
We hereby establish our Irrevocable Letter of Credit No. 698
in your favor for the account of TUPPER, INC., East 12929
Sprague, Spokane, Washington 99216, up to the aggregate amount
of FOUR THOUSAND AND NO/100-----Dollars ($4,000.00) U. S.
currency, available by your draft(s) drawn and presented to
the Washington Trust Bank, and accompanied by the following:
blritten request by the Spokane County Planning
Department to the Washington Trust Bank indicating
non-completion of all or any of the improvements
to Summerfield East, and the amount of money required
to complete such improvements.
This Letter of Credit is assurance of completion of installation
of a Cyclone Fence along portions of the blest boundary of
the platof Summerfield East. Spokane County Planning
Department will return the original Letter of Credit when the
work has been satisfactorily completed.
All drafts presented under the credit must contain the clause
"Drawn under Washington Trust 6ank Letter of Credit No. 698."
Any and all banking charges, if any, other than those of the
= issuing bank, are for the account of the beneficiary. 4Je
- hereby ergage with the drawers and bona fide holders of drafts
drawn under and in compliance with the terms of this Letter of
Credit that the drafts will be duly honored upon presentation
and delivery of documents, as specified, to Washington Trust
Bank, P. 0. Box 2127, Spokane, Washington 99210
All drawings under this credit will be governed by the Uniform
Commercial Code as adopted by the State of Washington.
Sincerely,
eonard C. Decker
/ Vice President
LCD/cg
Washington Trust Financial Center P.O. Box 2127, Spokane, Washington 99210 (509) 455-3897
QUOTATION -
` FREE Moran Fence- ~ FENCES BY
ESTI M•ATES ~j ~
~
534- 14 13 ta RA Y STONE
T~ A1)707 N Freya Spokane, Washington 99202 ~
MO-RA-NF-236PC
DATE
ALL WORK WILL BE PERFORMED IN A WORKMANLIKE MANNER'
=E i2s !\"°J AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD PRACTICES. ALL POSTS
NAME - ~ I SET IN CONCRETE.
aDDRESS ~ , ~ a ~ ~ I ~ ~ f ' ; ; _ ~ ' E 1 ! ~ ~ ; f ' I ~ ~ I i ► ~ " ~ ; ! ~
cI7Y
€ y
E ~ ` ~ • r ~ ! t i r ~ ' ~ '-'-3'-""---~-~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ E ~ j f ~ r ~ . ti ! ~ ,-~-~i
,
STATE ZIP ' L~
1, ~,jt.~.c_•,.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ! ~ ; i p ` ! f , p s ! ►r ~ i ~ ,
'3 `7
PHONE NO
t f
~
PJ F ! j J
WORK T
PE CI FI ATI N S ~-1
S C O ~ ; @ ' ~o~__~___~ ~ , ~ G
j i-J I_ 7 U
TOTAL FOOTAGE 17 • 1
TOTAL HEIGHT
C ~ l?' ~ i ~-r" ~ ! ! i ~ ~ ~ n r ' ~ i ' ~ S p 1 ~ 12
STYLE FENCE '-71
H C X,>
POST SPACED • ° ~ ? " t ~ 9~t
WIRE GUAGE
1 ~
TOP RAIL
UNE POST
~ f p
END POST ~
L~.___~
CORNER POST ~ • t ' I ~ ~ ~ a ! ~ t ~r; ' ° ~ _5
Tj -
r-~,-
WALK GATE POST
DRIVE GATE POST
GATE FRAMES
GRADE O AIRLINE O LEVEL ~
t
❑ STEPPED O GROUND O CONTOUR ~
TERMS:
' DESCRIPTION ~ AMOUNT
Cash on completion unless other .
arrangements have been made in advance.
oEposrr s Of
~
CONTRACT CONDITIONS
Property owner is solely responsible for locating, staking and
cleanng tence Imes.
Purchaser also agrees the Company will not be responsible for
any damage to underground obstructions
!f a compressor and )ackhammer are needed a nominal fee
will be charged
Prices subJect to change due to material cost increases at _
any time. - "
Building Permits to be otten by propert~ ow~ ,
SALESMAN ~y ` .
I
COMPANY ,
ACCEPTANCE -
ACCEPTED BY Total Due On Completion E
r > ' '
~ ~s~,~~.~ ~~r►~~c. ~~~~~s~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~{~1~~~. - , ~~~t~ ~«c~.~rr~
PROPOSAL PHONE:
~ iA • ! /
R • ~ ' . I y ' ~ M ~
4125 EAST BOONE ,
SPOKANE, WASHINGT0P~99202
DATE
r..•~
` SUBMITTED TO e )W(- PHONE
CONTRACTORS LICENSE ,
I CA-SC-AF-'240L! ADDRESS ZIP CODE ' "'0FMm~9-rS t- lJiPLI, E-5 P-LV
. LOCATION OF JOB
01~~I~Ls . .
Post Spacing ~ 1 DRAWING
Wire Gauge ~ 04
,
Top Rail 13
Tension Wire
Line Posts f
Gate Frame '
Terminal Posts ~ `
Drive Gate Pasts
Grade: Airline ❑
r
. Level ❑
Stepped 0
Contour fl - -
Ground ❑
Buried' Phone ❑
' Power 0
, Gas ❑
Sprinklsr ❑ ~ Permit: Customer 0
~ Cfl. ❑
N/R ❑
; •
INDUSTRIAL -
Barbed Wire in ❑
Out D
Barbed Edge Up ❑ '
Down ❑ '
CONTRACT CONDITIONS PROPERTY LINES: Locating, staking and clearing of fence and or
' property lines shall be the sole responsibility of the purchaser. Any V ~
effort extended by an employee ur representat►ve of Cascade Fence I
Co. to aid in the location of such tines shata not be construed as an I
assumption of the purchasers responsibility.
DAMAGED: Purchaser agrees that Cascade Fence Co. shall not be heid ~
responsible for any damage to underground pipes, wires, or hidden I
obstructions, and herewith waives any claims relating thereto. ,
ADD6TIONAL MATERIAL: Any materiats delivered or installed in
, addition to that proposed herem, shali be subject to an addiUOnal 1
charge and vuill be billed at the current rate. ~
' GUARANTY: Cascade Fence Co guarantees all matenals used to be of ~
a quality equal to or exceeding accepted industry standards, and - ~
all work shall be performed in a craftsmanlike manner m accord- `
~ ance with standard trade practice. I
TERMS: PAYMENT IS DUE IN FULL UPON COMPLETION OF WORK UNLESS Sub-Totat
Sales Tax
OTHER ARRANGEMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE IN ADVANCE.
• ' ~ ' TOTAL
Accepted by - + - - AccepYed fo
'URCHASER Date COMPANY , ~ t•~~'~ Date
-
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO.
Sauth 25 Altamont Strccl Phone (509) 535-I410
Spokane, Wasllingtan 99202
J u 1.v 10, 1984
~
79841
~
Spokane County P1 anni ng Department 'S~'O;ti~~~r
iJorth 721 Jefferson L ~UfVTY
fUNiIVG QLEPAr(Tj4L-pjT
Spokane, WA 99260
Attn: John Nunnery
RE: Summerfield East
Dear John:
On behalf of our client, Tupper, Inc., we request t-~e release of the 1etter
of credit which was given to your department as aguarantee for the ccnstruc-
ti on of a si x-foot chai n 1 i nk fence between t-iie properi;y of Tony Danel o and the
Sumnerfield East project.
The fence has been built and the letter of credit can now be released.
Sincerely,
INLAND PACIFIC ENGIfJEERIPJG C0.
v ~1, , ~t~1✓
Eri c W. Cal ki ns
EWC : j es
,
a ~
zp-
~Q y
,0
Engtneering • Plannzng • Surveying • Ernvtronmental Analysis
i'
aINO 84 0273
B~g'pRE 'IHE BCAM QF COUN`i'Y COMMISSIONERS CF SPOKANE COUNIY, WASHINGTON
PE-1206-78
ZE-202-78
IN THE MATIER OF FIL'IING THE FINAL )
PLAT OF SLP*EFFIELD EAST AND )
Z O N E Q H A N G E F R C L M AGRTCULTURAL T O ) R E S O L U T I O N
R-1, LCX'ATID IN SW 1/4 SECTION 35.)
T.26N, R. 44 E(r~ii, SPOKANE COUN'I'Y, )
WA. )
BE IT RFSOLUED BY THE BQARD CF OlY CONMTSSI0NERS CF SPOK;ANE C'.C)UN'I'Y, ti,&SHIN~N,
that the Final Plat of
SUMMERFIELD EAST
That portion of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Zbwnship 26 North, FZange 44
E.W.M., in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, described as follows:
BDGIlNNING at the South Quarter corner of Section 35; thence South 89°52' 00"
4Vest along t1e South line of the Southwest Quarter of said Section arx3
ce.nterline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60.00 feet in width, a
dist.ance of 661.05 feet; thence North 00005138" West, a distance of 30.00
feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue and True Point of
geg;nning of this description; thence North 00°05'38" West along the East
boundary of Plat No. 4 of West Farms Irrigated Tracts, as per plat thereof
recorded in Book "O" of Plats, page 51, in the Spokane County Auditor's
Office, a distance of 1121.63 feet; thence North 62°23'41" East, a distance
of 192.97 feet; thence North 40°31'59" East, a distance of 48.01 feet;
thence North 65°56'49" East, a distance of 128.00 feet; th~nce South
46°13'24" East, a distance of 114.31 feet; thence South 23 53'S3" West, a
distance of 130.45 feet; thence South 12001'08" East, a distance of 52.56
feet; thence South- 18034140" West, a distance of 146.87 feet; thence South
a distance of 910.00 feet to the Northerly margin of Wellesley Avenue, as
it now exists 60.00 feet in width; thence South 89052100" West along said
Northerly margin a distarice of 311.10 feet to the True Point of Beginni nq
of this description.
more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the reccnnendation of this
Spokane County Hearing Exaniner Czrmlittee, be, and the same hereby is appraved
with the exception that the public rights of way dedicated in this plat will
not be established fcr maintenan.ce purposes until the County Engineer has
certified that the roads have been impraved to County standards and appraved
by a separate resolution of the Board of County Camnissioners
.
PASSID BY TI-E BC)ARD THIS ~ day of , 1984.
BCaAFtD CF COa]TY C'CNYaSSIONER.S
OF SFOKANE COUM'Y, M.SHING'PON
Aj,
ATITST :
wri►r.il E. DoNAH.E -
Cler'k of the Board
~r.
~-'x
" - • - - ~ ~ ~
R
APR 4 1984
sPU►caNE couNrY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. ~
1
ot counsel
Patnck H IfVinstan
~ L ea td Cestiatl (1977)
C Matthew Andersen
C~ Mori3 Baltins
L Q ~ 'V E 0 S Roberl P Be:,chel
James P Connolly
Claire Cordon
SEAFIRST FIfVANCIAL CENTER Michaei d Cromn
SPOOCANE , Vi!ASHINGTON 99201-0695 Leo J Driscoll
F J Dul aMy, Jr
(509) 838-6131 Roberl A Dunro
4.ucinda S Eymann
TELECOPIER (509) 83$-1416 James A Fish
Richard P Guy
Tim M hliggins
Joel C McCormick, ffi
Stanley D Monre
Apr i 1 9, 1984 R'e' R M°ui'°r
Mlchael F W6cr.stedt
Lynden 0 Rasmus5en
Joseph J Reko6kQ
Richard W Rclyea
Stenley R Schuita
P3ttick A Suuivan
Jamos F Toplift
Mr. John Nunnery Lawrenco H vance, Jr
Ftoberi W UJhaioy
County Planning Department Meriwotner D uVilhams
North 721 Jefferson Petr►Cia c Wdliams
Spokane, WA 99201
Re: Fees in Lieu of Dedication - Summerfield East
Dear John:
This letter is just a note for your files to confirm our
understanding that the fee in lieu of dedication as contained
in the Notice of Title Restriction will provide $58.00 per lot
to the Park Department and $168.00 per lot to East Valley
School District, and that these fees will escalate as provided
at 9 percent per annum only on those lots which are included in
the final plat.
As you know, the final plat entitled "Summerfield East" is only
a part of the preliminary plat of Summerfield East subdivision.
Lots within the final plat entitled "Summerfield East" will be
subject to the escalation provisions of the Fee in Lieu of
Dedication Agreement. The remaining lots within the
preliminary plat of Summerfield East subdivision will be
subject to the Fee in Lieu of Dedication Agreement and the
escalation clause of such agreement only when these lots are
the subject of subsequent final plats as they are submitted.
It is of obvious importance and consistent with the intent of
the developer and the county that there is a firm understanding
that the filing of the final plat entitled "Summerfield East"
will not cause the fees or the escalation factor thereon to
apply to lots which are within the preliminary plat but not yet
the subject of a final plat approval.
We anticipate that subsequent f_inal plats within the
preliminary plats of Summerfield East Subdivision will be
entitled "Summerfield East First Addition","Summerfield East
Second Addition", and so on.
Mr. John Nunnery
April 9, 1984
Page 2
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please place this
letter in your files.
Very truly yours,
~
~
~
4AINLE R. HULTZ
SRS:bc
cc: James P. Emacio
Ken Tupper
~
r
~
~
o o 2 z ul
Covenant
Summerfield East
to
Publ~ic -1 G G 2 2 C.~~.`
RECEIVED FOR RECORD, this date, the above instrument,
numbered in order of reception.
• ° WII,LIAM E. DONAHUE
County Auditor
Spokane County, Washington
FORM 1 AUDITOR o
- - r-
.
iPOKANE COUNTY PLANfUING DEPARTME
NT
APPROVcD PLOT PLAN
l. 0 ~ ilN~✓ '
~a -
1 eJ ~p '
. • ' ~
>O ' rJ/
. ~
~
t . ;
r ~
• ~ . ~ ~
,
r I
?7
r
~ .
. ~
4f
~
r r ~ . ~1~ • ~ ~
I Q 3 0~
~
.r ♦
I ~ ~ '~a~- ~ . - _ .
~ _ . . . . . r
; \ .
~ • ~.J
vO
ja-.Sl-
cz~ f ~ sr r • 1 , _ , . ~
r
, y.
I~ ♦ \ ~
J d
0/
T i ♦ v~ C. 1' V+; • M~
I , ~ : _ _ - _
~ ~ 4r~t'' ~l~{ ~ •
a C~
„ l
• .
~ .
~
k
. ~
/
~
. ~ .
,
r~: •
, ~ . _ , .3 •
SPOKANE COUNTY PLRNNING DEPARrtME
. NT ~ p ! Y
OT PIAN
r r•~ AU:ZDATE
:
.
~
. ~
,
ilo;
Aal
I le t
• h
, % •
• ~
~
i . ~ ► y i ~r" , ( f ~
x, 4:~' 0
t✓' _
f
,
~ i , i • .
! y _ , , ~ • ~ w .
. . : . . 03 ~ .
i
~ - ` , ~
i ~ _ ` ~ I ' t • -
r7-,
v C - ; • ~ ~.1 . . ~ ~
~ "i' _ , ' ~ ! ~ i . ♦ 1
_ ~ ~ - . ' ~1~ . • 'j , . ~ ~ _ .
. ~ , , ~ ~ ~
.
. - • ~ t ~ ~ ~ ;
- - - s; ~ ,
• ~ ~ > ,
~ . . . , j; \
, ~ ~ ' , ~ • ~
~ ^ . ~ 1 : ' •
~ ~ r , • f~
~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ 1. 1
i - . ; i~ f- 1
~ . . . ~ , .
.~~1 ~ . ~ i 1' ,
O ~ ~ .~'r .
• - ~y~ ' • 1
^ . . t ° ~ _rr •
,
Z,D To 15-p
~
:
-
~ i , - ac_ v~ •
• , - • . • ~ , 1
~ ~ ~ i~
S; C~, ~,„TY Ab~:
'tF,
t~ ~~F • ,
AAj
~r. ~ ~ i i:.:..' ' ' : _..~l;:t,
Tuppe1,.
y1 . TITLF NOTI CF r
n`~ J 4►f•~ rI 1
~?,~4~~` , ' • ~ "SPECIAL FEE" -
~'~-W►~-~ ~~i.• ,til~~.~~ 1 rl •
1 ~i~li~IC
COUENANT SP4:.~~,.' C~C!~~ rY. ti4'KS'tI,
SrOKANC CJvnt♦ CCuwT h0U5C
. ~ ~.i •
E 12929 Sprl: ; Attn : Debbi:~
That the bel ow provi si ons of thi s"SDec i a 1 Fee" Covenant shal l._~
fol 1 cr:i ng descri be(i pronerty :
SUt-►MEkF itLG tA`;
That portian of the Southwest Guarter of Section 35, Towrship Zo
Range 44 E.W.14., in the County of :.okane, State of Washington, cescrice~
a s t ol 1 ows :
BEG:~~NING at the Slouth Quarte.- corner ot Secticn 35; thencc
South 89°52'CC" West along thE- ;,outh lirp of the Southwes~
Guarter of said Section and certerline of 14ellesiey Avenull_~
as it now exists 60.00 feet ir width, a distancF of 661.0:"~
feet; thence horth 00°05'38" riest, a distance oll- 36.00 fert
to the Northerly niargi n of Wel 2s1 ey Avenue ar.d True Poi nt
of Beg i nn i ng of th i s aesc ri pti c-; ; thence North Ju °05' 38"
West along the East boundary j` ?lat No. 4 of ;~zst Farms
. I rri gated Tracts, as rer pl at -hereof recordec i r Book "G"
of Plats, page 51, in the Spcka:e County Auditor's Gffice,
a ai stance of 1; 21 .63 feet; t-iznce Nlorth 62°23'~1 " East, ~
oistance of 192.57 fieet; thenc~ north 4~~'31'59" East, u
aistance of 48.01 feEt; thenc( nurth 6b°56'49' East, a
aistance of 118.00 feet; thenct South 4:;'13'24" Ep-st, G
Qi stance of 114.31 fei=t; ther.- ~out~ 23° 53' S;i" 'n'est, a
a i stance of 130.45 feet; theriCe South i~O1 ' GB" tast, a
di stance of 52.56 feet; thence Couth i E° 34'40" 'tiest, a
aistance of 146.87 feet; tnen%-.e South a cistancz of 910.00 fieet
to tne Northerly margin of Wel]esley Avenue, as it now exists
60. OU fieet in wi dth ;thence Sc:. ::n 69° 52' Ou" West al ong sai a
Northerly margi n a di stance o` ^111.l 0 feet to the True Poi nt
of Beginning of this deSCriptIL+i. WNEREAS, the sponsor .)f Prel imi na ry Pl ur-"Sun:-erf i el o East"
pursuant PE-1206-78 file correspondence oiti voluntarily cfter to prcviae
."fee-in-1 ieu" of de(iiccting 1 ana for pa Ks arc s-hoc,l si -es, an(i
WNEREAS, the Heari ng cxami ner r)r. Januar; 30, 1~;70
r.i ~ •
accept the "fiee-in-1 ieu" offer and aoac ~ a condition-of-aFproval tc P-E-1 2U-i "
for saia tees, anG
i'}1•'- L C r ~ - , . . - ~
_ .►4 L:~ . , i, i. - r<t .....,1't51 ~c ~ . d l I ~ pri or to i ssuance of any bui 1 d ing perm )n eacrl ? ot as ~*iqul atea nt~1 ow, 6~11;
w'HEkEAS, the sponsor i n f i 1 i r. - Lne T 1?^s t Fr,cse or PE-~Gb-~ ~ as Fi n~
Plat -"SUh►h,ERFIELD ERST" has referencea this "special fee" stipulation in ti.
dedication on said Fi nal Pl dt as the mtt►,v-o T; f, inr: f_:ture lct cwrers o,"
Said special lot feA.
'r"iI U ~Jv
1
•
/
~
TiTLE r:07iCE
"SPECIAL FEE" COYENAN7 - Final Plat - SUMrtERFiE-LD EAST Page 2 '
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in ccnsideration of Spokane Eounty approving
the Final Plat of "SUhtiM.ERFIELa EAST", the Owner(s) in signing said Final Plat
Document do hereby acknowledge, agree ta and add the following covenant to all
residential lots within the property tegally described above, as provided for
herei nafter:
l. A one time fee of $58.00 per lot payable to Spokane County in care of
the Spokane County Parks and Recreation Department and a one time fee
of $168.00 per lot payable to East Yalley School District No. 361
shall be owing, due and collected ay the Spokane County Building
Codes Department in ajaition t3 any ather fees of said department
prior to issuance of the initial building permit for any lot. Said
' $5$.40 fee and $168.00 fee are.each subject to a nine percent (9110)
per annum increase each year on the anniversary of the final plat
approval by ttle Badrd of Countv Commi ssi aners of Spokane County.
2. lhat a11 provisions of this covenant sha11 remain in full force and
effiect on all property owners, 1ieirs and assigns of said residential
lots of SUr<MERFIELD EAST until Spokane County Planning Department
extinguishes this special fee ;,ovenant by filing for public record
wi th the Spokdne County Audi to: a aocument enti tl ed, EXTINGUISFih1cNT
OF SPECIAL FEE CONYENANT, which includes:
a) the same 1ega1 desciption as this document,
b) a statement that references the CounLy Auditor`s filed document
number of this document and declares this document as being
extinguished, and
c) a notarized signature of apprupriate Spokane County Planning
DepartRient official or other applicaLle official having "lead
agency" jurisdiction.
The appl icant for the Fina1 Plat SUMtr;ERFIELD EAST acknowledges that he/she
has read this document, understands all its provisions herein and has or will
ad vi se the owne rs of sa i d Fi nal Pl at SUP-fh1ERF I ELD EAST property of i ts 1 egal
significance and effect prior to their signing saie Final Plat.
DA7E0 THIS ~ DAY OF 198L• '
type name e w signa~d~ e
~
SUBSCRIBED and SWOR!~ bCr0:•e .iie ~ 4 G'~ of i. , 1984.
,,,,,~.~~•,r~
~
~
''C, ~ ~
•
u f~~: ~ j / f
. ~ ~K,~'~ C',~..~ • : ♦ ~ t L %
hota ry ~,ubl ic i n and f or the State
a S ~ -
of Washington, residing in Spokane
=`'~•`A 1:
5~~~
. , • . 2
~
,i
s _
SPOBANE COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
S; . r
' At Donald C. Brockett
• ~ _ - .
~ ' -
•I
~t
~ ~ ~ I I ~ !r I
-~f~"~ 1~1~'.•,'`' • ~
~
var '
41 v
4R
p~q~yF
~!0%4, '98 4
N~~G ~~Ivy
MEMO TO : Wal? i s Hubbard, Director ~Rj Planning Department ~liNr
Attn: John Nunnery
EROM: James P. Emacio, Chief Civil Deputy
DATE: March 22, 1984
RE: Sumerfield East PE-1206-78; ZE-20278
You have advised the Prosecuting Attorney's Office
that the sponsor of the above referenced plat is in the
process of finalizing a portion of the same.
In conjunction with such action, the sponsor
is required to meet all approved conditions set forth
in the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee findings
and order dated January 30, 1979.
One such condition concerns the construction of
a chain link fence and provides in material part as follows:
That the sponsor construct a 6 foot chainlink
fence along the approximately 900 feet common lot line .
shared by this proposal and property owned by Tony .
Danelo, prior to any finalizing of any phase of this
project. Mr. Danelo's property is legallX defined as
West Farms Irrigated Tracts Plat #4, Blocks 113 and 112.
Attorney Stanley R. Schultz, representing the spon-
sor, has indicated the sponsor's intent to immediately file
a portion of the plat. In so doing, he has advised, the -
sponsor can obtain substantial benef it from reduced interest
rates. In conjunction with such finalization, Mr. Schultz
has requested an interpretation of Condition No. 42 referred
to hereinabove. In particular, Mr. Schultz has requested
that if the interpretation of the Planning Department staff
_ is that the chain link fence must be completed prior to the
♦ 1 .
Wallis Hubbard, Director
Planning Department
Attn: John Nunnery
March 22, 1984
Page Two
finalization of any phase of the project that an administra-
tive interpretation be made to allow the finalization of
the present phase being processed, with the contractual
understanding between the sponsor and Spokane County that
no building permit of any kind or nature whatsoever will
be issued on any parcels of property within the first phase
being finalized or any subsequent phases until the chain
link fence as referred to in Condition No. 42 is constructed
as referenced therein. To guarantee such agreement, and as
authorized pursuant to the provisions of RCW 58.17.130, the
sponsor has agreed to post the necessary performance bond.
Although in reviewing Conditon No. 42 it does appear
that in fact the chain link fence must be constructed prior
to the finalization of any phase of this project, in what
appears to be a clear attempt to protect the property
interest of Tony Danelo, it would appear to counsel that the
proposed administrative interpretation as requested and
conditioned by Attorney Schultz would still clearly protect
the property interest of Mr. Danelo. In particular, it
should be noted that the applicant, at his option, could have
constructed all roads within the preliminary plat or phase
thereof at the direction of the Spokane County Engineer's
Office or could bond for the same. It would appear to legal
counsel that the construction of roads within the preliminary
plat would have as detrimental affect on Mr. Danelo's pro-
perty as would any other activities in conjunction with
construction within the plat. The findings of fact for the
approved preliminary subdivision do not seem to limit the
ability of the sponsor to perform such road construction
in lieu cf bcnding for it.
Based upon legal counsel's review of Condition No.
42 and other conditions of approval imposed by the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner Committee in conjunction with the
preliminary plat approval, it is our recommendation that the
applicant /sponsor not be capable of filing any phase
of the subdivision until either the fence as referred to in
Condition o. 42 has been contructed or, in the alternative,
an greement has been prepared by their legal counsel
indicating that no building permits of any kind ox nature
will be issued for any lots within an approved preliminary
phase until the fence as referred to in Condition No. 42 has
been completely constructed as required therein and a bond
has been provided in an amount determined necessazX to
guarantee such condition. It is our belief that the agree-
ment and bond will protect Mr. Danelo's property intezests
<<~ as referenced in Condition No. 42.
.
n~
is ~ J.P.E.
~
~
. ~
- 000<
East Val-ey Schoo- District No. 361
=
Administration Office- N. 3415 Pines Rd., Spokane, Washington 99206 f'hone (509) 924-1830
~ BOARD OF DIRECTORS Cheryl Cunrnngham •('hilip Foote ■ Douglas lambarth • Russell Sumner • Jim Wold
SUPERINTENDENT
Ed Jenkms
ASSISTANT SUt'ERINTEPIDENTS
L Dean Lueck
J Arthur Keith
BUSiNESS MANAGER
Tom Crouch
March 21, 1984
Mr. John Nunnery
Plat Administrator
Spokane County Planning
Department .
Dear Mr. Nunnery:
East Valley School District No. 361 agrees to accept the walkway parcel of
land in Lot 14, Block 2 of the Summerfield East Addition with the proviso
that we have prior construction of a six foot high, chain link fence on the
Vlestern boundary of the Trentwood property.
The walkway will be quick claimed to East Valley School District No. 361
after recording the final plat by the developer, Tupper, Inc.
Sincerely,
EAST L EY BOAR OF D I R S ;
, ECE
I
P i 1 i p . Foote, Jr. MAR =
./"Board chairman 29 1984 ;
P SPO~Nf COU~y 1A~NING
~FpA Tfr
EAST VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 361 RTIVENT
.C~~ .
~ Ed Jenkins
Superintendent
sm '
1
~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ➢ ~~~`~t'
~ I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
4 Ij ~IIS c~T't:i,:~"~~ :'N:.V CEI.TRE Pli': iP:i, N721 1zFFEPSZ,^N STFi
EET
,~~a:► 1~'"1' ~ i ~ ~ -~'w~-~--~"~,`-,`--"~~
r a,►. ,~5.~ , ~ '~i~' PHnNE 456-2205
~ •J ~.J -
SPOKANE JVASNiNGTON 9926C
SpO-AN[ COUhT, tJURT HOJSC
March 7,1984
Stan Schultz
Winston & Cashatt-Lawyers
19th Floor, Seafirst Financial Center
Spokane, WA 99201
Dear Mr. Schultz:
Per our telephone conversatioii tiiis morning regarding Summerfield
East Subdivision, I have enclosed a copy of Mr. Emacio's interpretation
of the preliminary plat condition of approval regarding "Fees In Lieu Of".
If the intent of this condition has in f act been met for the School District
and the County Parks Department, I feel it would be best f or Spokane County
and everyone involved to eliminate the final plat dedicatory language as
shown on page 2 of Emacio's memo. To document compliance of this condition,
we would appreciate a letter from the County Parks Department and the
School District indicating their approval to eliminate this dedicatory
statement.
Respectfu l ly,
JONN NUN ERY
Spokane County Subdivision Admini rator
JN/vr
Encl.: a/s
.
. • ~
~ R E C E I V E
W`R 0 2 198^
s~~OY'ANE COUNtY
PLANNINC DEPAA~~I~[~~
ME~iO '~t~: '~allis Hubbard, P~Ia~.nir~g Director
Attention: John Nunnery
FROM. James P. Emacior Chief Civil peputy
.
DATE: Febru~ry 29, 1984 -
RE : Dedicatio~ in Conj unction with Summerfield East
Subdivision
You have directed to my attenti+on a gortion vf the
proposed plat dedicatory language of the a}aove referenced
plat. That section in particular, concerns the requirements
that prior to the issuance of any build.ing permit a certain
fee must be paid Spo]~ane Ccaunty for Spokane Cvunty Fark pur-
poses and East Valley Schoal District 1No. 361 for school
district purposes. In conjunctYon with directing such
dedicatc~ry language to the Frosecut+or" s Of ficer you requestecZ
a review as to the validity of such dedicatary proviso as
we11 as a review of the larrguage therei.n.
In reviewing the case law concerning the fees
imposed by counties on new residential d.evelopments to pay
services necessitated hy population increases, the Washington
Sta€~ Suprem~ ~ourt in the case of HiZlis Hc,mes, Tnc, v.
Snahomish County, et al,, 97 Wn. 2cl 650 P, 2d 193 (1982)
he1d tY?at such fe~~ ~~~ere actually taxen an~ the ~oun~y
lacked the autharity to impose such taxes. A+ccordingly,
ar~~ ordinance establishing such f~~s was invalid.
Although the Washington State Supreme Court in
1982 did strike down ordinances requiring the collection of
such fees in conjunction with the approval of new develop-
ment~ ~ case law did not preclude the deueloper "vvluntarily"
agreeing to pay such fees in 1ieu of dedicating land within
the proposed subdivision for park and/vr schaol purposes.
Accardingly, it is the present opinion of the Prosecuting
Attorney' s of fice. that the voYuntarily agareed upon require-
ment of the developer in conjunction with the Swmmerfield _
subdivision is va1id and shoul.d nc~t be dele~ed from the
final plat. This is not to say, however f that aproper~~
owner may not within the plat challenge the requirement of
the payment of thc fee at the time of the issuance of a
buildinq permit and that a court m.ight not strike down
the proviso.
Although it is the recommeradation of the Prosecuting
Attorney's office that the proviso remain in th+e final
dedica.tary language, it is our opinion at this juncture that
the language writhin the propnsal be modified. The language
should provide in material part gs fallows:
~
^
Wallis Hubbard, Planning Director
John Nunnery
February 29, 1984
Page Two
A o ime fee of $58.00 per lot payable to
Spokane County in care of th S okane County Par s
& Recreation Department whall be~o__w2ng, ue and
co lecte e Spokane County Building & Safety '
Codes Department prior to the issuance of any
initial building permit for an lot. Additionally,
a~one tim~ fee of $168.00 per ot payable to East
Valley School District No. 361 shall be gminq, due
onel Wcollected by the schoo~ ztxjxJ,. arior to the
issuance of the initial building permit gQz an
-
1.at., S okane County will not be res onsible for
insurin that the ee owed to East Valle Schoo
D' ' t No. 361 has. been aid an /or collected
r~iOr to the issuance of any~ini_tia u ing
Said $58.00 fee and $168.00 fee are each sub-
ject to a 9$ per annum increase each year on the
anniversary of the final plat approval by the Board
of County Commissioners of Spokane County.,
I trust the prior adequately addresses your concerns.
is J.P.E.
- ~
~ !r
b `
- - - ~
I HIE BUFFICE _
MEM[flAN;,_M
TO . John Nunnery, Planning Department
FROM: Jeff Forry, Building and Safety Derartme
UATE: February 21, 1984
RE . Draft Final Plat - Summerfield East
John,
In reviewing the proposed dedication contained within the plat in
question, we find one c o n d i t i o n t h a t could possibly require
extensive review prior to this departments approval of any s u c h
~ condition (see attached).
{
If, i ndeed, this condi ti on i s to remai n a part of thi s dedi cati on, we
request that this department be notified as soon as possible to
provide us with ample time for review and comment.
Thank you for your consideration.
JEF:pjk
~
Enclosure
R E C E V E
FE B 2 2 )984
SPo%,ff c,)U,v Y
P! ,~~~~~4-iNG DEPPUi MENT
Spokane County ,
S DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND SAFETY ~ . ~
North 811 Jefferson ~
~ Spokane, WA 99260-0050
.
T
i `ie t,rntv c4 5pokene is 1►c►eby gran[ru, tne :►t c-f ingres% and et,wMss to j! ll %,A :ter. .,I Cf ;oC ara I ns;,?
en Ses*ntS aC lac.ent to the Dub1 tC riqnts Of w
ine property atmer shail nainir~n tne si~ctcrn 'If.) ftw: wf~e u:f+itr !-d ,~ii~~.,c ~,,;~r~,r..-- ,.,F•:.,~-E.,.. ,e _cvrr
I3Ktt Lurf. OatfQAAl zhrvt,tu:ry anC/or, :ree_. YY!-ICh filJ f10: 'ftS'fJCi f;,1% at.- 5:.4ri*. :'zerayt watt'- t^
!'lE' drd2.'1ae1C' Stt.);C aS illf!1Ca1:ed b.y rl~ Ur'1,.l! Of ad;ArEYit `t+'paZS ;fQ~,•~1kc rZ..S•r-X ".?t'. .'rti^ :hP tf,X• ~..F,
Urtil :Y AR•1 c.'ralftm?P Fi c"r: '.h3.~ 'Nir~'ntr,~. :r ~ :u . ~►+r;, ,•..J ~t~' ,'Tp' Ir t~r. ~ ~-r
. _ .•r" 1 1 _ . i ~ .
i.~~ ~i:~5 wiChin L1115 SLIr(1'.V? y ~1 , • •i „ 'r• ~ ' 'r ~ - ..v. : . . r:r 'S ~ _ _ vC' ..~1',~ :r:
the u;dt!eC front nroperty line.
.
Eacn ioL f5'nutRorizc+d for tht t--rary use of an lndiv!dva; o~-sSte se.~ape C i s;,aseI svsZz: tx:I v a~t~tI! ir t rea _M~-~
oueratirrg sewers9e•.system is ava(l~hje. Jry srwerage llaes as a~N,r*:ve-J and r►QutT•b py ;fu go-rtrainq mw•.iciaa? i±Y
Lnail be instaiied in the pla:t.e4 ~,roptrLY aL sawe is Qevetocev. 4s a canvierattan-for U+P aCcepLcfct o` •his e-a;
: pv Cne Spoka" County 8oar,d of Qi[r,issionen, the a.ners of a21 nc^-QUbttc pr-a(+erty Ae*tie+ u1a.teC ir:;, :t:t;. btc_bj
oy• trscts aot to prntesfWf',, 36.44 or 35,43.1ao 1tU1 2',* construciton at. or' 2ege1 i:sessc*at for. say "s~r
,ltirnrtely sertlteq .Lheir non-qdbjf ;Yrc>perty at' rich tfre as it is OCSirvd Lv the govtmfng, mr►icipalltp ta constru,_
:uc+i :eWer:.. ~ agr~ent I~tre~ e~coressed sha11 br considercd a ca~et+e~+: to rn Mfa+ tRe lsnd a~►.", shyT; bi cen-3•
!s A provisiCn of each aud erery'l~aeed draf+n Lo Lranster orn+erthiy ~f eny end i11 propert~r etli_~eated ritr~in tb:S pia:_
"aCh strvcttn't '~t~lr~ which ie~le ~ to issuP s!ul11 be plurt-ed artd connected Lo COll.etin► tth~ts 'iRteyded ta setrtr!
•_he area rv*+.~l~ouQh use of frxil ~~~uai on-stte se+~raqe Qi5~sa1 is duLA0r±7Qd ~*►•1f119 iveiZ+~t+iii~► bf a~► cxratir►a
.-ea-wtde sawerpge snter:. Ttie iii,-b1~g shaZt prevent entry of se~++aRA i~'^ Lite :o!itti:;or iirso.s ~~n!tl eu:^7r+Zt^ b/
!he operai(ottt Agenc,y cuncro:ling :-.e coliector ?iaes.
. .
_ot 14, tllack m ten foot (104 dide itialkr~ay as snowm b'ireon, iS hereb.r 6adicatr4 ia 44e siimmte :o ;sit ~e~lr.y
;(,hQ71 ?is_ric: !b. 361. .
one tinrt 'e^ of Sbt3.00 w 141.sya6le-ta Spokene Cotrnty 1a cere of the SoQka'e Caswry i+aflcs u+a at,crlb:io+► De-)a•,.i.*rt ~
a eme t;."W fee of S163.01) tot payable tc East Va11ey Sc!wo1 14S:riCC tiC. 361 sks11 t+e ow1nv. due~ an.: by J
SQOke~e CecMU 7Ji14 1 a Go }3partwmt 4n advltion to any ;;*,.ier iet; of saia Ceaartne+,! p,r-icr to is;:swe cf
il pjo 7 141 na. per~t or any. fee ar►4 $1E3.rrJ fee are ea:Ik s-jbJett :.o a r.! ne perteaL il;:; ier a►.r..M
ancrtdse+tar,h. y"r on the anatYdr,•ary of the tir.,l P.at 4Wpro"~ bY t*ip (4f c.cr,ntr t'am►tssfonws rf f*.okanr
~ . ~-r-
- - 'i ~ -
-
~
~
,
w 1::tESS 61REDi. the se14 r-. t►are'herevRto seC thtejr har+ds anr, a'f cartr seols " a^,: thi= -e, cf
. , ' -
` '"IJPPER,
' ~ . . . . ; . - .
_ t
rs33enL ~--rut ier - - ,-~~~5-~~k
.~1.~~` • 1 ~ .
r
: ~ -~u_.a~~~
' ~i . . -
. ,
~:.:~;.SS b=ftCOF, OO I%I17IQ' P449. UF 'rutt*e fW fa,.. . : . iot*_, tuS O.e^t••~n•, sc' and
efftx@d 1t: SFyi (if anr) tr.is. Ger af• 19 .
• . - • - - - • ~
uC '!A? 14KAL BAl1k 8F WM$ht?. dy _ ~y y ce si.~.~,t • ~:,t f--r~ts~ ?fe` Estit: ~RTi r - - - -
; r
Pacific Northwest Beli
f C E I V E
~
January 25, 1984 ' 1984
'
'A'UAA(;t COUNTY
PLAP:NING GEPARTF,IENT
Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson Street
Spokgne, Washington 99260
Dear Sir/Madam:
The utility easements included in the Summerfield East
subdivision are satisfactory for Pacific Northwest
Bell.
Sincerely,
,
E.E. Norris
Right of Way Agent
North 904 Columbus
Spokane, Washington 99202
Phone (509) 455-2709
cc: E.W. Calkins
Inland Pacific Engineering Company I
South 25 Altamont Street
Spokane, WA 99202
-
EAST ~ AIZEY SCHOOL DISTRICT- 40a 361
EU JENKINS, Superintendent
L. DEAN LUECK. Asststonl Superrntendrnr
Telephonc 924-1830
Administration Office - N. 3415 Pincs Road
SPnKANF., W ASN INGTON 99206
OOARO OF DIltEQT011i
A. WESLEY SfilOEMAN
AOBEFiT P. IRONS
DQNALD KFIUEGER
PHILIP FOOTE
DOUGUS IAMBARTH
September 12, 1980 •
Plat Administrator
Spokane County Planning Commission
Spokane County Courthouse
Spokane, WA.
Gentlemen:
East Ualley School District No. 361 will accept the parcels of walkways in
Summerfield East.
West Side of Project - 10' x 134.36'
East Side of Project - 10' x 133.00'
North Si de of Project - 10' x 128.00'
SuRmerfi el d East has promi sed to put chai n 1 i nk fence around the three si des
of our property. The Board of Directors of East Valley School District seeing
that this will be done, would accept the walkways as shown above.
Thank you,
EAST ALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 361
Sanfo d H. Ri ggs
Business Manager
SHR/sm
cc: IPEC L/
ID
~
~
~ o ~ga4
SQpr~p~ ~tiP R~~~
4~NN~~G
3115 FI\' 8 73
-
. - - - -
THE WASHINGTON WATER POWER COMPANY
- ;°ctI ic• urirI A' nt;i rc I tat ` 1~c rq-tc:
~ P 0 BOh 3727 • SPOKANF bVASHING'aQN 9922: • i509is89 05J0
January 30, 1984
Mr. Eric W. Calkins
Inland Pacific Engineering Co.
South 25 Altamont Street
Spokane, Washington 99202
Re: Summerfield East
Dear Mr. Calkins:
Enclosed please find returned a copy of the above-captioned proposed
final plat which our Engineering Department has reviewed for electric and
natural gas utility strips. Please be advised that the utility strips as
proposed are acceptable for our use.
Thank you for your cooperation and assistance.
Very truly yours,
David R. Vill
Land Services Supervisor
DRV:msh
Enclosure
CC: Spokane Co. Planning Commission V-,*"
S E R v 1 N G 7 H E I N l A N D E M P i R E 0 F w A S H 1 N G T 0 N A K D 1 0 A H 0
'FONANF CDLTh'i'i' U:KI.i'`N D7SiRi(:T
De4TE: FebruarY 4, 1984
'0: Subdivision,--Administrator, Spokane County
'RU ~
M'. Daryl Wa3`~•5. - Environmental Health Division
'U9 jEC7' : PE-1206-78 StLmtnerfield East Addition )
Please be advised that this agency has reviewed a draft final plat for the above
referenced project (portion of original proposal consisting of 28 'ouilding lots),
and has determined the same to be acceptable as presented. GJe are willing to
sign the milar wnen subrsitted.
~
6
0. i ' '
Q~PNN
RECEI6~T Date 19~ 238 -
Received From
G, '
Address ~
~ NO 'M-l I a rs $;,L#-Z) ' j
For
ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAID
POP-NE COL'NTY PLANNBiG D£Pr.rl'i:v'.=T •
AMT OF
ACCOUNT CASH ~p`
AMT PAID I CHECK
BALANCE MONEY BY
\
8K806 Redif9,m DUE ORDER
~
G+FFICE OF TffE
j • ' .
SPOKANE COAT Y . - ~ • i ~ ' ~ r r• .
, ~7i:,J I ' i, PLANNING DEPARTMENT'
i - ,
County Treasurer,
County Assessor, 61dg. & Safety,
To County Engineer, Environmental Health, Utilities
- , ~
From John Nunnery, Subd i v i s i on Admi n i strator -K~~. ,
ew• • eT• i.•1 L r yy.S ~Si . y• • ~
Snbject DRAFT F i nal P 1 at I)NNA~*A'lE~z) jF4.5r
~E- okr/0.4) oV= Date ~-J~ 19~
Please review the attached DRAFT Final Plat and let me know the results of your
review.
Attachment
~
~
0
~h 10
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING CO.
South 25 Altamont Street Phone (509) 535-14I0
Spnkane, Washington 99202
January 26, 1984
John Nunnery
Plat Administrator
Spokane County Planning Department
PJorth 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear John:
Please begin again the process of review and approval of this first proposed
final plat in the Summerfield East project. Enclosed are seven copies of
the proposed final plat, a copy of an assessor's map showing the location of
the plat, and a copy of the water plan.
About three years ago we proposed a final plat of apnroximately 65 lots of
which these 28 lots are a part. That prouosal had been reviewed and was
apparently ready to be finalized.
A new pl at certi fi cate has been ordered and we are worl<i ng wi th the uti 1 i ty
companies to get new letters regardina the easements. Also enclosed is a plat
check of $140.00 (28 building lots @ $5/lot).
Thank you.
Sincerely, `
INLAiJD PACIFIC ENGINEERING C0. .
,
~
Eric l4. Calkins
EWC: jes
enc.
'~i,:
~
~
Syy i2C~~~~P• ~ • ~~V
N q± ,f
1 p ,1
Engtneering • Planning • Surveyzng • Environmental Analysu
~ .
. , •
ECEIVED
NOTICE OF ACTI~PI BY THE F~B 15 1979
SPOICANE COUNTY N I:AR I NG EXAMI N ER C Oi1th1 IMANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CFtAPTER 43.21C RCW, NOTICE IS NEREBY GIVEN tHAT
THE SPOKANE COUNTYHEARING EXAr1INE[t COh1MITTEbjp aN January 30, 1979
TAKE TNE ACTION DESCRIBEO BELOW.
ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE. ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTNERWISE CNALLENGE SUCH aCTION ON
THE GROUNQS.OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITN THE PRQYISIONS-OF CNAPTER 43.2'1C RCW. (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL P4LICY aCT) SHALL BE COMMENCED ON 3. 1.16 ~ 79
(30 days from date of 2nd newspaper
publication)
OR BE BARRED.
THE ACTION TAKEPi BY ?NE SPOKANE COUNTY HEARiiJC EXAI`sINER Cor1MiTTE~OTICE OF
WHICN IS HEREBY GIVEPI, WAS AS FOLLOWS:
2UNE RECLASSIFICATION & pRELIMINAR1' PLAT APPRt)VAL,
• (1 ) APPROYEO aCTION: P206-78, SUl`UICRFIELD FAST
(2) DESCRIPTION: Subdivision of 91 acres into 268 lots for
s ingle fami ly dwel l ings.(Por t ion of NW k, Sec . 35 , T..26 N.,
R. 44 E.W.rt.)
(.3) SUCN ACTI4N PERTAINED TO PROPERTY COMMONI.Y KrtOwN AS AND/OR
OESCRIBED AS (street adress or general location): Located in
the 'Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley ad jacent Co '
and norrh of Wellesley Avenue, west oF Progress Roacl,
south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road.
(4) PERTINENT DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMIPIEO DURING NORMAL COUNTY BUSINESS
N. 721 NouRS AT THE SPOKavE COUraTY PLANNING DEPARTMEr1T, X)Gil JEFFERSON
$TREET, $POKANE, WASlii PiGTON , 99260 PNQNE : (.509) 456-2214
NOTiCE GIYEN BY: INI.AND PACi FiC ENGiNEERING AND CONSTRUCTiON COIZi' .
FILED BY: NA14E: PauI F. Jenseq TITLE: Agent E
SIGNATURE
' t l -L . E ~
MaR s 1984
SPOKANE COUfVTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
04-
aK'a~y'~r * 'ry~ `ai;-t+ t ' d•` 1
.-..+^"'r '~t ~ ,~yhStS:.~tiy ~~Lti ~ i~ ~~.~ti-t .f~~,~i°i~'-•,,4~ C~ to ,t ~ 1~,~~.`~r
.,d64 ~ ~ ~ t ~ ' ~ p ~ ~ ~'v ~r~~~,YY"~~~. .s.`~.: '1.r~ r ~t n: ~ n, ~t~r0~•4~+t,: ' ' 4..~ c ~i
~y.3 v~"""'~ . T• ,yi "y~r.i5^ , K'~:~Y~: t~K °'~/~{+s1~," * ~ T•• • ~p
~+s/F'.'_ _ • • ~ ~ R .1
~n.
y.~i•(~,.'~*„t a,~,~~ f- 1 ~:i' {
...a.~~s 1 ' ' • S ♦ ~ ♦ 7 "'t ~ ~ii ,y / ~ i , s
^y„~.~~,. G.~• _~-i dj.T": "~'~~;+.rl=.,. ~ ~ t`, iy ~.~~~"~~tY'S {~°;i'' `.f o.;'dr + ` ~ti' ~..r~ (;=j ~C `
~ hdG+.•~. W~ •~.rYtf}t' ~Y„ ~~r ~,;:•y.j t r.+.. :d . t• , v ;s
..p„" " ~ a..~. :'i t~• 93,
d
i `k
rotL,, , r.'~~~ p; t r 1~.
i t) M ~„1~1•~ i~~ c +a,p t~I "qy +.M .
i~ 1 ga'~1• , . 1"• Ff
~r~.; ~~.t~'~ * ~S:F
t.`n f ~~x` ~•~~iA4y;,~'~,a.~~i~ ',1 ~hq,~.dY~l~,~~~,,2 ~~,~Z.~'Y~~ y ~t~:~ ~~'~~}~~'~••a '%soP~, tl``,,4+'f~}~;1^5,~,~`~ ~:%+~.'rS +„+1~yv;,yy4.tK
~ :~i ~ ~ • ~ ~ a e." ~`„'r, e ` ~ , ` ~'a..~~ *~iy~ ik';~ ~s ~?x f i :'4', ` ~~d'a _ ~ r~ ~ ' 4e y'-
~~y~ 1
na ' ~i~ S,~}y~~{ •+$'~~'~i ~ 4 4-:
~~•CS ~ a ~ t1~D~t~~I ~~s.~
a~ ~ ~ lG~ ' "fi,t ti • ~ ~ t~~ ~"~~l ~'~~~~~t `~ti' ,~w ` y ~ ~ ro
t~~~S,~ ~ p•r i~t~
~~1~.~r ;1•1'~~A~ ~ ~^Y9~'~R~~,"~~ ~
M's2
`ly 1., e r 1. ♦
~"l; ?„~1~i+~y4 ~ • ~p ty:o~,~«~ E..-~'L ,''~'~i ~:o
P ~7 { .d~ °4r 2 Y 34>.<, ,~~1'ir:' t~ f _ ~ ~ . . ~ , t s e', .y+ ~ ~ . ,~yi
~ ~~~;e, ~ft yS'~ ~i~ ~ + xt•. ~a•s e P~K~~ ~ ' 'r,~.F ~ ' j a~M " •,.~6 ~ '/~`~"ir c2 i~~~ . . 3yY
i~ ^ s,q~R r,,,?~ }t~ y ~ , • ti,~ q' s r ' r t fiG~.;~ .~~;y~ ~q~~ i.
S`l`
~'~,'rj~~•1•h;~i~~.?
y~ S'~,+ ♦ « . r j f
,t , T ~ . ` ~ . , ~ Fr
IT4t ,ti~~~ `.l ~4t%~~~jSf ~T `~'(`:7~Y<.~Y'3~•~SA.yi~~?~~~ :a+Sti`~ ,`f~~~. ~ ~
~ •:R~~:h` ~~y• • . I ,~i
~ ~id'.~~~~1 ~i~ ~+fi4K ~~'d.t~ ♦4'~ t?yN''Y-• i
t` 4
~ i
~ ~ ~ ~~b :A<+ ' '"~zi.•~ e~.,b , 4 n~`1•' , 1'R~i ~~.F 'T'} ar
~.a.r•~~c~' ~ ~j~ ~'~a r,~x • v~`''
a r4
i
: r t ~O ' * G ~.+~w i i ,.~r'i^~ S i 1 ~ti.< E~3 ~ ,6'0 y, .~e~„1 ~+~.4~R?r y i{`S~ ~ ~r~ ~ t y3'i ~'1.~~~ t'~t., . ?v~~ ~.+~•t F~ {y; Y
° ~y. i~ 'rt';_~~i~ ` ;,~'~t,~ At.k' ~•••ti~a+~~~,y~ n!i ~a 1 a st{J i ~F j..1~ {~~d.~~ ~ 1~:1' ~ . :7~ { ~ ~,,;,A~ t. 'Y~ ~y 't -i 3i~^'-.t.
t1 J~, e
o e•~• ; :i .,,r ~ ~t•;-R ~f c 2 .v. 4' 3 t3': t~~,t,r: y ~ ~ ~;~;3. • b ~ r„~l ' o
4
J ~ - : 4~`«}~~ r'[,~} ,4 '4.~~, . 1 ~ ~ ~ s ' y. s° • , t~ v
!S al t2 ~ '<N v.~. K y. • F'4 ! ,,~tr ~ i a i~ ~Y 7= y' A•'l~ ~,~,at.~ q 1 3 / i+'. _ L
~t~,~, _ ' J• t .y ~ ~ c - N 7i ~ i , ~ d~ - MA { , ~J `4 C'~ p :
0.i3' k~ ` •.;i~aa}. ~ ~x r~"~~~Ln 1~~", + 3 ,e ~jT+'~ ~1~.}~••j ~ ,c pj T ' i .'7 tir•{a
+ j.' .:'3^ ~ li• ql~ ~i' ~ ~L r},}~~t ft- ~ f~ F ~i.'i _ ti
7s•^ S+iS 3'~ ~ i5~d i F.~ s ~ ~ 1^ ~ • p b
R'`~ L•~,.t'yf"+ ~''~p~ o" ",~aT4 ,~i{,~, ~ }'e„'YtAA,j;l' ~."`r f+ A..~',t •r_ar,:{~i''r~}: }'~~+.K f :.„~`A'RL:.~~ <t ~tt'~+~ ~ 'G,s b't=; 1~ ~ =
' }~i,e. , qn . ~A x r ~•1:#~ y , 1, ~ ~ r 3 1 ~.~.o-cttib*~.~r
S,.
.,~~'?~''4'~'t. 0 `l
4 'P c i, s~ ♦ + t t G~ ~ ,~l' ~ + k p~ ~aS~_
Y ~i',S y~'~ r~ ,~4,~? • ~ s- ~g' --4 ti,~'y , }~c~ i < . . . ~ x, r. ~,ff• ~
~~e r. ~ y * -a~' a1•y~ :t''~'`~ L`,.'~:~j~ . a, ti -v ~ i: i~~ ,=~3~ {`=t . aAr" .i ;.:,,~~Y~;= .,d~';& ~ i~• ~~.~z ,'t~J~;y ii3 'v~.S,
~ nl ;a z ~ ' * t t:, r.. sR v 5 ~,"TJ• r i {J~ A t'' \ 't M s
'Gi ~d,}. er 1~ .t. q' "~S' s r'+ y + ~ • • 1. hi.
i 1 5 ~ •~t 1~ r~ - l 'y ~ t 'y Vt ~ iS' 2, t ~H~ 1 1
;'y'~'.'~ y4'~~~ i Hd~:~Lf~,~1 ~y~ ~t ~ `a'. ! ~ ~.~^~Y ~j'~.Ly ~ ~ •t < 'a '+~+~lt {•f in.~ 4. K 'y ~~i ~ ~•'y„~_t.-i H.JSA`1{~. :.'~t~`i ~ S~~ ~ . . S~
~ arc~-
i-5;~~,i21~ 4 • • ~ ' ~ ` ~~",+'r n,.'Z Y (v t~ "o i _ !i T+ t . • ~ v . ~ !
~ K~
~ ~ ~ r~ 'td_ ~M 1~ , f;i^ ➢ 'j~., ` ~ ~a.i ti+ : {~Sq ~5., ,t tL
~y ~ 11 .7: ~L ` f~1 ~13~ ~ ~~h7.Q ~~.~~i.~ ~i i -0~~ ~ ~'vy" r~•s' ''t ~f~i~. 4 q'.~ l^ }."4
~ 1]~'] li ~ .r + u o c n~_, t.. a ~ ~ . ` ~ i TY ♦ t- «i
~3~' E ~,•~3~ f r a ~ Tp
(
~
..~.t
A"i a 1 y f i i 't t„~' v~-~',w 4 " r .7h ~ ~ `4xt~ ~ qn g P` r 1_ f
y ~•~~t_~.S3.r~` `.~~:j~~~'? • p { j ' r~ ~i~~ TG:x~~'t~~'1,.~.'yti.~'t'~~!`„11.7r~Q~~.~~~~~ r1 a~a
~t~`~~ Y ) tr ~ `,4' ~ ~ ~ -y ~~r~~~. ~ ~t- i ~4 0q~ R .i rY :+''^i ^'f i' ~ IvT ~ .9 • .
~ ~ rS~= X ¢ u ' q ~ ' `p4~:A~IE ~~J'~ ~Y =s ~ ~1 t ~ i(~Siy~ y i Y ~t ~ , y~' 'q~~ ~l 'l'y „ y; 3~'•f!~~d ~•.~e t^,)t,~6 i
aA f 'Sj
:y^"T .~tr • ~t I~' ~J \ ' ~ ~ A f`~ .+Y
d ~ ~ ttS t~`1 k'' ~:~11 s- L t~,~ ' ± ~ •,J s
~+i ~f • . ~~~+.z~i
~ ? - ~ ~ p~ t ' r.. ti `ik} o s ~,ti,r1 ` ~ ~ ~~r* ~ 1• ~"~'t1 S,~L+ Fy~.~,~j'40is'Li~}~ iII*`~~y ~y~{g ~ ~ri.[~ •~~1,^S-
~{~j'~ .A}'''~"~~~t~' t ! tC;~d~,•~l~^'° ~ }J31fE`~j.`y~~~li? $`'+~t~~T•y y` i, hyf^ i"~l~t~`~ J~7+1 ks':~ „ •~~~kt'
~ q'a' tI~ ,~,~d C. ti~. ;i ~ dEa`-~~`~*.~ y,~ ~ ' ~ r3' 4 r i~ ~ `4~ ~ r . ~ ~ ~ t ~ t a
r~,`~~~}",'~tiT~'1~ M~? ~ ~.~s~~".~,~ ti~y deY x bv~4~i~c~.""r' ~e.~~~,'~t ~t~q.t~ ~+K~«d~.,.~1tW1j• ilEA ~`r~r h t" A~t+a ~ 4~` 'A~r
5.~.` :~'{))~~•r.] w~';t.~ J3i~~~~~~~e r: .t' i''~~v' '~.^l~y~~! a:7.~..~ t'." ''js~~'7'~ y~'.l r~Y6 ~ ~~~J,~~, 1~ ' ~U~ p,{rl~ t, _ 4: "Ch .'i-vC `"~y-. . jiz ~ ~
~q L 'r 1 , t1"~l` ~''i~)3 ir ~P,,~',[• ll~.~yv`~~, .y ~1'{p~'tiYg~4~~~.t,~l» ~ , P 1~ t~,~f 2 ` . :1
ftt
~1' ` .D~LY'it d `r •i~.t%~ •~~y;[yy~s4.~.~.~'~' .i ~ ~ ~ Pt~,!~r' 1 .i.~'~s~{ ~'t r { N ,c Y ~ ~ ~ l~4 t,~~jr~• +n -'t~\i p~'st3, (~f~ ~ } .i. t . ~,~5 ) ~ ~
ti P'~S..,Ye'S rC M1 r~fW Z, i.'t~~1 t~iJi. ~ 43~++ ~GNS~~~rr^lj
• a t )''i.r` e pr~ F <~j4Z ~.x5»' ~ N~1i ~ tK ~ ~P.' G a ~.1 O+l~=F ~ - err'Sa , cr • ' . c' 'T
y v~t rAS ~c.. : ~ A { •t~-~ ' tt~ ~
~.Y. „`~'r! °~S a. 7. ~5~'b• t,~ aat., . ~.a Y 7 ~ P4 L 1 • ' ,t.~ Q}. ~ yF~ r ~ay~ ~ i~~ ~ j ~
-b;~ 7~2'~t eh.'c` } iJi 1~ 4 ~i < ( '`e ~t a,~ 1 l ~t+ ~5 y'f(tl,~a~~~a.,~~~i~ a S~ ~ i t til.+~ , e ~ s; ~ ~ ~
4}, r±+'n ' .9.ar.rY'< ~ L ~ z~+ ~~~~r~ ~ ` S r ~t , t ~ ~ya ~ ~ r 1 ~ ~i ~jPF ~
~~k y~, .
Is' 4i~• .i~~, ~g~pa
e. Ameri , 2 ~~1t`~,~12 '
n,^r~~~ Q~~ L7 1 ` ~ S ♦ ~ ~ P
~y
Y~7~~~iC.~~s~ . • w , i i ~y • t ~t n~, ~ 1 3 ~t,~ a~r ~4~ s .
'~a °I
~y i ~+a i' `+d' i ~'r. ~ t ~ y~ ~.'~~,N~ • d :st~ P ~ . , , n t• i ~ 3. , f
,~`~~s:~~,'~:;~: • • ~5,~
. - ' . ~,ed, S S
epos f 1
Y,~ s,,. ~ t •,~aa ~ ~bi
~yy~ ,Uj~• ,r •a ' * ~y~ + ,
"l ~sn3y{ir~7 • . ~1•~~,. S ~i
7 e a~.. ~rtr ~ ~ • eO~+Fsln
~'1r
+~~v,O~ o~ bath' . ~%-y}'t ywt ~ j•.'~1 •,e y+ c~ . ~ 411e
~7 .J
S~~ ~ ,,a •',4 ~ 11}~ l t^ i U ~u,`•~•~~~ ;jt ~ _ ~ ' ~.r~ •
t
~y~ he~ a~,e ~ , -M~::~
-t . j ~ I '
a xyY~~Q~l,~~ f • =Sy : ~:V .y'~ o t • 5+sti' 4 - ,y~ ~ r r pu+~ `ti ~i ~ ~t ; ~ . ~ ' e
~ ~ . ~ + :~,y ~ ~ ` , ~ S..i, ~ 1 ~ • j.r1 ¢+-`t ~ ~ ` ~ h~ ' ~ 1~• g~ .
~,v ~~1' qr~~ ~1 ~ a~,x .w• ~.~y: ,
bruary
„ n"tl Y y~ :~~b'"}•9~'~i as~. ~ . ty
4 4~~ ;^n .iy r
~ ~ i7j ~ t ~d ~o ~A',..z I~ Tt*i • ~ ~+0'
a. j~ 'i '~~t ra 'Lh 'ta,►/e TD +'1~y~~• . ,Z•,. • ,Js:i,~ y.he ae r L~♦•bs4t'"~~+~ii+{l.
61
. ' ~ • .f tj ~~'~st t..4 •~a~ ti a~.~.
e ib,•~ ~ ~:,,n :da.,
~ i7~*I q
3}
•+p`~ ~i~~: - ,CQ~es
n~- rr ct .
, r . `t~~~ ~ y ~ ' r~ ~~n . , ~;x, ~~t;~
.~re d = $ ~ ` ~ , , _ { CO
V • f, ~ .L ` J+A'~ ,
~1 'nP...~ 01~i_ .y~,1e ~0~+~~~ a~ 4~~X( ~ ~ ~ " • ~
yv:. e
• ~FJ,! ,p~p t1 rTs ! ,
w
v 1 r • ~ ' .y~ ~•r L~ ~ ~ i
~ ~L"~ L},~~5 ~ ~ , ~ • " ~yL~•~ •'ty~a y?, ~ • ~O~y Y •4~+~`•~♦ . C •Ew As O?
1,a. ~t k'y~~
Ol~'
~3+»..'~ r' ` ` ~~•~4~~~~L• T4ttF~aC• ~~~t ~1~~ }}~y~Y ♦`~y ~ ~ : ~ ~i~t~~ ~1 n ' ~
QS'~B~``"~M'i-^~,d.lr T
~~~,f`.• . ~j ~,~.1y . I•;=t ¢ ' ~ ~ by` e ~rGl~ CGi V1ae ~ ° t t"''S, r~P y,~+v,~f~ ~ , ~ •
'~=tJe.+ y S~ ti"` 5 pQ+j `SOe~ :4 : . .+i ~ ~}~~t~' • here1n' ~ ~ ~i 11
~.porate
aire c e y L+
, w,.~, ~~h~~~~~;'~,,, • ~hea ~d -i.nc°.~~;~'~~~'": erty ~ '°s;` - 'E` ' o~~iz~.~~ 10 datl ~ °:°i~ i
tta proP , , q,~ •i , A ~ X,~j.}+~ ,fo1~. ,
~ tf ~,1~'tl~.~~~ t~+`~', ~•t~j~
Y~~•~ J S y.~,~,~~~'t~yrr~'k1. }r.mmey~Ln~~;•~R 011_rP`~.~f i' ut7 e! tQ.rWJ+ y~y Progre
uQ N
~~~(~~~y~~ ' , • on
~ ; ~ .i~.~+" ~ ~ .]~O+` ~ I'~`~• - , ~ ~ ,yf~01'erty~...
~ons~p~-C , . -•`~`~r~~~ ~~~~e ACTs ~l ;O,r: ~}1 n
~"L " .r+'~~ r. `~1'Y~ 7 S•~
~ F`i ~ i, j:`
y, „ r ! "C ~~r' a • sChOo
\j ~ ~•~1 x ~i~ • ~f tr"~, ~3 `1~ 11 t t.•• ~ ~d~
h
P w ~,'y~ b a- ~::s ~ p~ t , c , ; • •
e su n1 Q t
~ ~~y x~ S'~ i{r;r. rt ~ ~.e
k,•~ eSs
~
~u nd pr iq
le a
p'V r c + r s t r ~ a ~ p~A~~' T S a ~ r i, ~ ~ i e'\^ r a`~. '`'1 • ~ G t.s r fe 1. ~ y q ± l a? a
hone , 1~e7~e5 -,u . ~~~t~~,. ,~~,:j~
a ~~•C~ A~ s ~ 7 ~,y,~i f 1 r ~ ,t•i. p 1 t`.
~ y'1~j r,~ 1 ■ 5 , ~ t ~,~'ti...~ ~ k'~'k ~ ~il`.
i Dt °T f G`1 i~-x ~jr1•A f~.+
~e 1~ O" `+~p~` ~ • ~~M , . { { " , v• ~ ~ . i .G
~ '"'t:&-.~..' v •rr i~ ~.f, ~,3N ~S'~'y: i i..)~ ~ ✓y ~rv ~~~s t rl~[ • T SW :OT'~tG Aaa~~mi7
~i~. µs 3
yZS~~„~e...~F#'s'~a`~,. ~~F~~g~ 4Y~~fv;p~,i ppp tt~ _r.' ~ ~ ~5~. p,C~~;•'~ ~
`ie ~v' ~~n_,.~~ , ~ ~~~`°atr'tea
e ~ ~ ,
~ 1' r ~ t l'A
; P' ~ O~".~O~ t. ~ 3y,~ . • j^t ~ ~ d U`~.''r,
.4,• ~ b~.~~.. i {c ~^L'r C ~Yi r y t ~c ~.~j, t~~ `r +~5 4 t 'r~`a t e.~n
Ji ~,tl t~ `.~r.t~,~..~t,.;~+'a~d. .tlt+, ~'~i°-.. -~"S'~~► ~ 'li•` ts; ~ • p:f .~r.~•
Vne
O '1 i~4 ~~.V~ ~~:..~t~l: r ' . { ~ y ~~Z'a'~; ~s •.+V_~*. '7
~ yy~'.iYt,v~+~~'a,~f,L c i ~ A ~w T ~ 4 ~ • t .~i . ~ G' ~ ~ A ri }'~t.'1 ` ~Aa^r.{~~i~ r i • s v ~ l 'ri ~ ~'r t,~ ~ x ~ i~~~r i ~ P_ : S[:`.; . j
~h ne o Tr ~ t~ ~S `'~`~~~'~f r•- ,..f ~t "r►' ` } ~~~~~#i.~~' ` 9 ~ j+' ' ! •`''f.~ ti~ 't e , (~i
l' ~
' ~ r~r~. ~Y ~~aaw"'~ a~w w+~'~ y ~ 'S ~-r~ t ' 'Y#1 g, ~ m~ „ F`,,, S` 1iy t i.P• iS ~
a~'t ~i'1 Q~g,~` J~~. 1Y a
~ L+~ ~ ,f• fj•- , a ;~itr_4 aFn ;r; ir ~'y,; s l
~~,t!. q•S5 l ~ ~
v1 v~'3:1 t ~ ' k, \ af -f'~M' ,~~`y',• `t~ C `~V r a • +Sk'r• ` . ~ 1 .
Ce `~a~.:5~~`~~~'~~ P:' ~ y•+
.-~~e, r -~:61t~~~ p ~`~f• - brv,a y , ~ i,•e . ~t M
~t~''~C p`-#~yr+r+~L• p M b'R-~ ' ~ ~ •~i, ~i=i`;• ~ :r : ~ . . ' ' , 4t°~e t~~~' . ~ ~~•~„b • ~
r { f A • ;,..rr,+""6'r '
kir:, + :4i 1
satt^ ~ . x ;~,t,'t ~ ~~r
~ a b....- i•.. i . r" ~.F' ~ 1:=" ~..7
~ ~y r~l ~Y.ro ~f►~i~{..~ ~ o~.~;TS~ ~ttJ.a,~ ~ ! ` r~rt . ~i.~.n~~
~ 3th, - . ~ •3. ~ _~~~t
~a ~t',`~~'~~--T~+~+~'''~'°'~`T:b 1~S h'~°%^,.^ 1~ ~ ~ 4 o~';* ~l~Y'_r~i', 5~ ~ '~~'1~.1 't q~ ~ j~`y,~r~rx7~'°~t~. ~~7. i`.
Ly~-~ S t' i~ • ~ ' V ~ s ~ ~ } ~ ~ SJ , 1 •
i 4 ~~r; ~ y ~ ~y,.~ ~1'~{•~a •~'~j~/ I~Sls' ~st
t H~ .~`Y• __J tw,„' g•.~i t~1~ Z~`•-; , A a`?~ r; ~ x'~'~Y~~3,1 1
~~~'%'~~i~i~ 14t {k.t . . , ; • ~ r,.► $ ~ ~
~.,si`~~t~ E~# p~..b j`~'rt1 ^ ~ l ? : S y . ` ~ 1 4 ~ y~ ~ -~S ~ ` • ,~S `N9 ~,v Y .
~ t~~f 5, h
d'~,`~i ~t~_ _'4';~,,/~' ~ ~ ~ i.~Fj ] ~.4,`_j.r 'Y i t'~ °til t'k ~ ~ ~ _ ~1,.. 'S 4 ~1; j~ ,i~.` !3, ~~F P
• I ~ ~ a ~r~,'1'{~ '4,~yc t.. I~~, t, - ° t'~* i`~ ~r, h c~ .,~,j~4• ~c. ~ ~.y~ ~ t',~.r 11 a:..k ~ i~ 4 y .4~ ~ti-h ;~t: ~+ry~ 'i ' • y",
~ ~,54~~/~t t0"" ~-{`fy,•~Y~d`C ~i:i`K~.f'~7' Yi;~ ~ -t}~.~ e
~bre .`~~e ;t,A '`~,~e.f~~~ ~t'~.~y,,yG~jb1~hrh jj t~ •.i~~~•r~~~~`.~} %i`.4'~~~~~ rF~ka
S'S''r'~, ~ r{'5~~36~ ~►"-t44~.~y. ~.~y ~ ~ '~j,~J
~
~ Y
'x
a ~i t ~ r yl~e i.Sd.•~ ; w, v :f
~ r it 1 i '4:'" ~~~,~y pi. C•' r. A~kh~ , ~ +a.v a ~ • a ~ ~
~~J{ ~ ~9~•~1~: + ' ~~~1' ~'~•r~~ ~~.o{I~a~~+~S b V.. p, rl~~ ' "ofe~(~M~e~';~f~ii 4
. C. "w~ Gc~ - . ~ : 8~ 'vn . , , 1 , A ,v ~ , ~ ' ' • ;
, ~ ~ d a " ',~.y~ ^'[}~8,,,~Y . r~`S. ' `i ~ ~ • { . ~r~~f , . ¢ • r ~.f, ~ t. ~ ~ ~ y. y~~ ~ ~1
° ~
? ~t`t ~t„~r ~?Q~ 4 ~I"1Uj/ ~r: 7♦~`~~4. i as y ,,r . / a ~j f:~ i `>.si
'
79
; %19
yy~' S tat?°
~.j~~" "i e~jt . i~tC^'t 7 ~O~ N7.L~~
L
„1j rY d + `S a !
Y~ift,~Ar~4, G~jIM}ruary 4
t~~~~' r C i Spif~L;`.~'l'J1•i'4 '~k~~` ~ b~•~. ~ a~ ~S.;aa~4c ~a"1 to" ~_`F-- h.i ~tDtt1~~~t~".li
~ ile> +r'. ` tit:i s 19 l~~'i +`±hiy'' i ~'Z ~~~.j~►' ,.,y. ~ „t r e~ ~ .~r~ , 'i+1•• e~ r.rwa,~~'~ i~~y1~'~, ~
L`.X}"~~V~.k ~ yx...-
t7ijc~, tiri ~y~bip;'`t+``!'7 ~~YFS• y~y~l~~
1'' 4 1~~`~,~~ ' S✓,' ;i~~'~~tq4,~Aqrs
Yi ~ac 7q * ~1 'i~~ ^t.r +~R~1~` ' . Z'"'9~`: ~it4 1~, f~- . ~ 4 ~ a+4 ♦ _ : `•i~!' ~ S',
< j~
~~fs+~ i..~s}'~ j
' L'~•~ ~ ,9:,~j,~;`~~ r'>. ~ ~+5 ;,v, Zfti~ ,n, ~cs,Y, ~~i~} "~p1~...y.~Uy+ka.}S^S~ ~ Ftia'Si
: '}'7i• a~ It`~3siy tl~~ ~ .r.s`t~ar~~ +pa.r~
i~~"v~s ;i~•i;t~',~'y~8y~!1(~lr,~~..p~ , }.~`s~r. X~i •.r~,t ~~~+a~ ~
~ii,$~' :yi~i. •t ~„S; j^~i, ~S~ Rn~~~ .
q'f~'~4''y+`~~~~
`S~ : ; fP ` ,t tr'~ ~'~i~ t+~ ~`+Y`~'~ ~d v ra tt'. ~,~s i't,Q^ 'J~ •l.;C i'k~~~~j ~n~~{,,°oe~ y~[~c~
x = iS~R1 :~'~✓p'E~ y„~a~~ ~t' 1~~+~~t}~•~' 4t i ie`i i~~ ~ f..~1 . ~~w ~•;5t ~~•g ` ~ ~,~~~.1. lY~
1 ~'t t. '~'"nf "~y~.4;~. i~ g •i~y ,iT.7~ ~ ~a ~y r zt x ~Sa t,AzA~" `~i"
N~~~
~.T ' ~"l r.. r• 4 7~ ;4'~I~~ '~``1 ~ ~i~~xr~sct '
~ , t,=iFJ+i.' ~l~.'~v ~t{'~. ~ ♦ ..iJ '°Z5,'.~ • fi~r h" ✓~G~ti.i~~ 7t
A? 1{1l ~'\r ~r ~r ~i) , d t 45 i' 'ta' ~ ~ c ~ ~ .
,r~C`y~S~ k t ~A~.yi , ~ t'b i- ~ Y ~•t ~L 7t~~g~.'.~~ ~f~'i ~s
~ S r d~
~ ~v `y~~ 't~+ ~ ~,y'~,~'~~w~~ ~ t~~t~ ~f'~s',. °''.t`~'. '~i•,~~,t A.
" . ~.r k~ . ~ x • • ry ~,►6~. ~'..~ai
`I .ft ,I t~~ d ✓ti ~ t;. *~a+° :ti= S
~j
~ t:. ~~i, , t ~+.`d L~, .16 i' ~ F • , t~ ti7...+ i Sf
~ _,'•'r1 1'~• ~ ~ i~
wp a e 'i • ; 2, k r i ~ ~ j t ~F tf ,i~y' +fi`, • ~ ~ + `~~1i-~' T
i~.~~.Py
a~r ~ ~ ti:~'„'.~rti~b a✓+ ~swA y~Ot..s e• ~ }`i r s~~}T ~i'II' i y f.~J~`~ ~'~fi~ik ~i'b,h~ K~<K t~~ rr iF~'~i;S~• . y:Y~ ~ ~ x_'•
a ~ ,.,_..~6 i;i t..,je~ ~I ~ 1,tik~.ti~ . S}~~ • ~ r~' •r. ~t
~ ~J a r o t '
•a •Y'R'; ~~•~a ♦ 'aJ'ly i~ ,~+Vp ~ ' • 1 y ~ ~4~'} ~ ~1 'r~ ~iK ~yf~~'~•
'1 W
s• ,;~6,+K ~ ♦ ~ 'iY, a♦..N~..4.~ .a: !L'}~ ~ 7 e i t~'~ t'.,a ` ~1 ~ R.a r 7h s i~,y ~ ~ s s '~~.y ~:W~ ~ ,y ~1 •
~{,~Ci I ' Lp~,`y~Nwf~V~~~Y~V rr'"'Tr ~ .},*t i~'~':{~. t,v{~~ ~'~'~ei's2r~i~ tj t ~i ~yti'~dt„r';w~ t t(, ,i'1~•~~`~ .i~4' ,
4~ rr
~~,'N ~ ~ SiS~ ~ t {0~+ S µjv 4 'Y • ' ,~6 S~ .~i` ^tip k~~.» .r~~~$ ~,~i,•~_CP~ 3 1~l~' ~ }+a
t'~~. ~cp"r,~~r !!~•Y ti~~ ~`t7O° o'►►' ~'"a`y,tL 1'.yr~ n ~`~1•~ a ir~t b ' K~~,-'S=k~ ♦ k ~r; <'a
'yP• r. N ~ Pv I. J~ ~'j,`. ~ ~ r' ` .+b ~ -S'' ~ ° _'r ' ~ ~'~.{T i ~ ~ ~
♦LL~I L L .r t ,R Y +'7 L.I ~ { J~y{ \T ~ ~ r r' ~T.F Q t ,i'i~, Y+ ~ 1 i ~
a.~rt*, C~'~y,~
,
y"i ;~r ,
*v.~: ~p a.~` `~,f • u .
e : t n ".,n 1✓° ~r...~u
:t
~ - ~
p►FFIDAV{T OF PUBLICATION
6TaTE OF WABHINaTON,
NOTICE OF AC?ION eY ~ COUNTY OF SPOKANL,
y THESPOKANECOUNTYHEARINO
, HXAMINER COMMITTEE
Pursuam ro tne orovtsions of Cna ter J~,IiIl C. VLi~I~Ui~ iC.1l _
, tl 210 RCW, notlce is hereby given ~nar be~n~ f irst duls anorn
the SOokan~'County Hearm9 Examiner
Committee did on Jenuary 30, 1979 take
'tfie acti0n destrtbed below on oath deposes and ssivs thnt he is the
~ An acilon to set aside, Rnloin, revtew - - - • - - •
!er ot~+erwise challenge sucn action on of the S P 0 KA N E V A L L E Y H E R A L D
, the grouncls of non•compliance wlth the ► ci weeklN ne%NsTntrer T}t1t 'R1tci neii9-
visionsoi Cf►e ter 43 21C RCW (Sfete mraper is a lcaal ne%%s)~aPer nnd it Ia no~.~ Fnd hae been for more than sca
. o~nvironmentel ~oucy Act) shelt be onths rior to the d~tte of thp ublieation hereinafter referrec~ to. publishe~l
commenced on March 16, 1979,or be : r P
aarrea in the English langua-ge continiiallr as a %%eekly newspaper in SAoliane Cnuiity
eo ntY HearirqaExaminer Comm~itiee, «'asliington, and it ic now ancl cltiririg all OE Baid time was printeci in an offit-e
notice of Which is herebY piven, Wes as i11AifIt11T1E'd at the aForesaid P11ce of pubtica,ltlion of said newspaper, which
fol lows oved summ f peld EastAZonenreclessd~call n' said ne~vspaper has been appro~Ted as a leRal ne~vspaper by order of tho Su-
and preliminary plat aovai a~erior Court of the Stute of ~V1s6ington in and for Spol~ane Countv That the
(4) Desalption Su Ivislon of 91
acres into Y68 lots for stngle.tamily
dwellings(Portion of NW~,, sec u T annexed ie u true copy of a.... r+otice__ of _l,ctiop
16 N. R 4r EWM)
. (3) Such ad10n Derteinea to-popertY
oommonly known as and-or oescrlCetl
as Located in the Treniwood area of fhe
SPokane valleY adjacent to and north of • • . _ • • • • • • • - .
Wellesley Avenue, wesf of PrOqreis fIQ jt WRR puhliRhed lil regular 1sBUQS (AL1d ItOt 1❑ supplement form), of aaid
Road, south of Forker Road anC eest of
Bannen Road
(a) Pertlnent dOtuments may be
examined durtnp normel counry ne«•spaper onco each week for P. periorl of twa__ consecutive
Dusiness hours at ihe Spokane CountY
I Planninq depariment, N171 Jefferson ,
Sh'eet, 5 kane, Washin9ton, 99460 ~
Pnone (s~v) 456 2274 weeke, commencing on the. . 7th _ .day of...... . k'EbrJaaY' f . 19__.~'~
Noflce Gfven BY Inlend Peciflc
Engineerinp end Comt►uction Garp
Ftled BY Paut F. Jensen, Ayent '
77 -2 14 and enci.inQ oa the --141;h day of. . . 19_ J
bot,h cl.ites niclosive, an~l that sur.h ne« cpaper W as re~;ularl} distributed ~4U
its FubscriLer-, duri 11 of s, per~
- - - -
bubecri c3 d sworn to before me this_ . 14L1L de~
n~... . k'eb 4~rzy . 19 .
.
. f .g............... ~~t;in- }'ublic in and for the State o
W2r~ ~n ton,
INE
^ R.esiding at: Spokane, W A
~ - - s •'.~S } • . , 4~s L ~~~V'~• aL i ~ ~'r..+s r. ~t, ~ 1 ' ' ' ~f'~~?~~ ~~T ~ ' ~•~f ~ `4 -
r ~ . ~ K g,i r.-'a~e. _ e ~ t31,~ h 1 ~ ' ' • f - ,~•e F
~ Y~ t ~ .2 ~ l' ~'~1t$ ~rro ~~v.-~~y+ f.e~~yer~lj~~2 ~
~ J r'
d> ~aI~+J'.Id%rnrl~f ~ iiasti+tpi•~ i :v.. : i~+ti'.Zi~'i.~+4r..e. 'Fi m.. ~ . ~ .'34• .P`~ro~f-:.r~~.flt ~~~.M11j.i►~-~ ~ iJtj~ _ • ~ ~•'t~ L` ~
"~~~e:
{~.y~;j~ ~r~^F ~ ' ' • ; .,~~:~-~o •t -
~ • • l Tn _ , '1~ „ _~f' _ ` ~ ' ~ , ' ' 1, N~,: Qj :
° ~ ~ ~ ~ • e~=a.~~~-'^ ~rl.•' . ,.t~ r ~y~ y ~ th ~ ' ,
4 t; - ' j ~ ~ 4 ~ . J • ~ s4- ^ ~ ~ • ~'~SI~ •-1 r - • Z p. . i
~ ~F • ~r ' T ` ,7 ~ ` . J t .
~C tr~ ^ . ' ,a .•-`i_r: ~ ,a ~ ~ ~F-' t ~ , • « 2 • . c'-!~'.'r ' I L . ~ 1
T.
j ' • I ..f • ~ ~ re ' l ~„4 a ~~P I.L.:M1li~i y~ ' , ~
4..~''T_-i';t~r '~xtc 'r I-r' ~ Y, ~•:.~.,i_~c . : r.~ ~r,?L.r•_ ~:~y ~ a/•, ; ` ~
•~T~a--- , : ~ •
t
• au- : ~ ~-c, a.~ .~s• ?~a:.,;-'~ -r ~y-~~~,~tth+~'i F ;~L~:~r:
ir~~:~6~~t•~~Fgy9'~y ~.~lLq~~..~~~1 AFt~~~~„i~} t~ `~•'~I~~~~j "a• •`'aF'~ . '•sr~1j~(~.•~ ~
~l.~:~ ~ y . ' • '3~' . . ~ t a~'~Rr'~.1 7 ` f.~ ;~I. Rd.~~. tRr;1y, f t1 f.a•
• ~ . 1rp~ . 7 z~f' ' -j'.t ~ ` ~.c ~ ~ ~ ~u ~t~ i ~ ~ t y R~~~+ a 4 4 ~~C~~a ~~'KA,., f'~{i^ t►.y~q .`j,r~,
.i..s. .r _ . . . . ~ ~ i i A• ~ 1. ! ~ ; ::.'~e~' • t~ .
• ~tr t. i ~ ~~~4 , ~ ~I• _ , • ` ~ ~ Y' ~ t _ ~ t - ~ ~
gn.
~ ~ , * r 4 ~ r e • ~ .t , ~ x e'~!^A -1'~mt ~ ♦ ' { i, f y w
ri ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ` iO~ '~~~~~~e~i
u
' ~.d,~, r~p~ i~i . .~..'yJ v e~li9 l.S;~ '~._,~VL .A . . ~t b.S~+r~'~L . t.• . ~i„ ~t, ~~~yi~~ f ~ S`'
~~•~~Y~!~~~Yt,/i:uf'~'~ti1.'~i~~°~~~~5'~4.'1i.ir~5e~"'~~Y,~".~,3c''~r~.S~~-+~'M'
~
S ~~l • ~ ~ ~
R
. i~. Y • ' ' ~
• C
~t ~ >t1 • 1
` ~ ~-.r~ » s _ +..w.e...,t.~.... : d~.~ : ~nu~rt:. C. ~ ~ ~ . «,l~-~ .Y n6i+~4, . • Y:. :`~ia~ ' ~ . ~.'Tt~. : .:.::.~s.~ ~ f..ai.. r . ~ , • i~ ~tiftt'..
~ ix.7- .r+ ~•r fi rY + y,~ 1 tr tp►LL
8 ~ •~~7~ ~ ' F r+ f
+ '~,id~~: z ° ~.s : -c~ . $~c e,
~_r • } i ry~ ' r~ : ~ ~ 'f g' ~ ` ~i
r 'v~C ~ . ~ ~ 1~+ ` . • +r'~a' . . •~~it ,~4~~ `~Mi~`~rtir ~ _ •'~91~' 9~ ~ka~~''`
I
_
OFFYCE OF CDUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
DatP January f 9 79
Inter-office Communication
TQ, SoorzEne Ccur,tv Subc1 i v isi on Adrni n s strator
~
From Bob MECarr.y P 1 at enspectcr
Subject Subd i v i s i on Aoenda Sciledu 1 ed for Near ina Feb. 30 033
Ihave rev i c:t%,ed the extensi on of t i me reQUests Vhat are 1 i sted bel ow. The Engi neer's
Departrrent has no net-o condi t ions to add at th i s t ime.
~ ~ . ~
PS-1 ~~9 Morotto' sAdd i t i on
PS_ 2~4 bJ i ndsong Second Acd i t i on ~
PE° ~3P~ Blue SBcies S-cond Addetoo;~ v
~
C l 1 ~J
JPN 1 ~~~y
l~N~' Go P~~~~
SQ~ NC,~~'e
Form 327-C R
~
F RECEIPT Dat 19z-2 1725
14
Received frvm a
, ~
-c~-2. 0~ " A dre5s
~
Dollars $
For o
.
AccOur,r Haw PAiD " Co"IT RAMMUW Me
AJHT. QF ~ CA5H
ACCOuNr
AMl FAID CHECK c
BJ4LAN£E i M4NEY ~
pUE
'
IRMC846 Retlrf~arm
- ~ _ _
~
SPOKANE COUNTY BUILDING AND.SAFETY DEPARTMENT
Inter-offica Cammunitation Datr January 12, 19 83
Te John Nunnery
F,n~ Ken Jeffrey
Su6ject Aqenda
t No additional comments. Provide standard F-2 and F-5
PS-1399 conditions. If private roads are developed within
PS-1254B plat, add conditions F-9 and F-10 as required (attached).
PE-1366
~
I E ~ JAN 131°
" SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
lUnt. E~,--t E t;.,i t icJii, `,(.fncia ico nr;i ~iUiI,
,1~` ~F~i.~u~ t1~ (;~Ji ~tl lilc] 1'li1
in~• Ct. 1; IU~.itQIJ iii f i.~~ i)i~.L 1 14_1 -
r-~) •",41e4ijJ lC' 1.+dtf_'r- 1*01 fi re pr-UZeCCic~n ,lnil (Ii;Cr jf)uCjOn Sut_11 .r,iCr-t i;
%equtred A uJi!r U1an is roqu>>'ct1 LO hp fo, ~,;if~~~)~~11 r►r ~r~~ ,
CO dny iJnd dCV00;)n4.111.
i
~
~-1 1 ~ pldn fpr emeiq(yy~y eyuipmienC ~1CCCS5 IS ruQuirCU CA iJu '.Whmi C~'.CC1 pr-ior- '
co a(ly lans develonnleilc '
F-d) InSCa11dCiOn 0f f I rC hydrdntS CO bC in dCCOrdanCC w►th C1iC rC4ui rpnenCs
of LhC SpOkane County OCprrCment of Quilding dnd SdfCCy ~
F-5) Mains and hydran[s to be instalicd, ►n acCOrdanCe wiCh Che Spo%ane ~
County OeparLmcnC of puilding and Safety
f-6) uater Supply cistern to bc installed with adeqtlate firc flow
F-i) Reconrnend approval Nith condition tnat prior to development of thls
propCrty ChaL an CnginCCred water diSCn buCion SySCtnt plan ;hell bC
submitted to che Spokane County OeparCmenL of Ouildinq and Safety
This distributlon plan shall inClude water main Size, flows, 1oCations.
fire hydranC Cypc and lOCatiOnS, water SCoragC tanks site, anA IOCation
dnd destgn Cri CCrid
;
F-fi) ReClaSSificaCion of an existing building Shall reQuire a(i appliCation for ►
change of occupancy permit, and subsequenc inspect►on for approval
F-9 ) Access Roadways for Fire Apparatus
(a) Rcquired Construction. Evcn buildin~~ hcrci(tcr c~~n- D ro~
strucced shall be accessible ta fire department appar~tus L~y ~,ay e~f,tccc.ti ru,~d-
~ ~.i~~s ~~ith all-%~~eathcr drivine qur~ficc c~i nc~t Icss than 20 fect of un~,~~.cn~ctcd ,
~+•i~iih wtth idcyu,~lC rc~.id%ke% turniii~ rscfius rap»hlc O( Sunportink thc iriE~p.«i
~ Io.id, O1 (itc app tr.iiws ancl ha.•in;~ i mininiuni uf 13 fect E-ijtChe. of %c;rtic:t! ;
LIc.ir.inLC Ut.,c!-LncJ fire dep.trcmc:IIt .iCCc.Na 10.ld. in etcc.s nf 150 fcct Iong ett.ili ~
hk Pro" u1',c! "'Ith applu~ec1 pro-, fur the turnini! .iMund ui 1irt- dclvrtnicnt ~
~
H.\('f f'( (O\ ~\~}Itn ihcrt irC n~~t inufL
Ih.in (uu (ifou(1 R Dit-isiun jiif Ni ~
0cCUI).+n~~C-1e. CiLGn«1 in ihL liuilillnt CchIC thc rLyuiruni-nt c,l tfli.,«u0n 111,1VtN, ;
~
mo.Silied, ..hcn in ihc. upinmin o( iiit. chlt-( firt.-lighiins: tir ic:-,CUe cykrjiiuo% lu1.1 ~
not t%,- viiE, urtd ~
(h) Ubs(rui-ting ihc rcyuirc(1 kiidth ut .t,-Les, ro.tc1~%,j%% sh.i!! n(it l?t. ~
nb%truc(c,(f in Jm rti.,nner mrluilinc p.trkink c►f vetiiClc, ,\'O I'•\KKI\G
(iiher ippropn.ite nuntx.ur ho(h E)tcrhihtttng c,h~l;uiti~,n~ in.iv hc: n.LIuirCcl ,tnd f
.haU he n►.iint unc.1
(c) bC C\tLtniC:f <<l k. tthin I il; i,Ci ~,t A1
lKirlion-, i,t (ltc ~~tc.r~t~t tll~ oi (11l. %liirs, ui .,tl% f~l'„tiln~_ 1E I,L« I1;L .~,i-t
n1.u1.k.sIt k.111 nt wi h~ j-iiI o itiCtl fppl 0~~O 1i11- j►ruio. iIi+n .ic.in tii .\t11 h~ .
lliflllk ~it~c1 .ic ~t-quitiLii ilui h\ lll.- L. 1114. i t
Wl! ~t'~•-~ir~~f~~'ltnn \ItLrri.i(i W1ik-'i lir4L pfufio-tion.\ .tt.►ti. fElilr(lticd h\ Iiit.
he
.1utl)(1111 ~ t%) riyuiri- an intik. l.L in tht- i
intn1inunl .i~<<•. ~t1[h~ k• htAc: •uk.h\Ait11fl 1. nk)t .0<qu.iit. ikir 1 irL or rc"~iit ;
it14111. f
!
rl l I{rit1gt. 111il-rL tlti•.t.--111011
~
~t .11.1I1 N- , (111.tnirto-k1 and niaintmn-cl in .ic<<~rd incC 'k ith thL .CLtI(1111
ui tltL fiiiilcliiiC (`~ik.1L I nd (I.tnl: LiL .ien Pik C IO.ulinU %uili1, iCni tl I L .ia<< (I:r i1n11,1,.•,+ ~
~
<<1. luL .tE1j1.Ic :tu~ !
F-10) Premises Identrfication ~
~ \Pllp--e-i1 -in nll nk-%k .ttid 4
c.i.linc; builkiinc. in .«.!i J10.iil„11 I, it, hL % thL ~
~ etrL LI „r ri l.ic! I1-4 intin~ iht I ~ropirt~ `.ud nunihi t. liill conir.i.t ith (ii:il
~
~ ; .
, ~ .
~~~j~ ~n ~i ; ~
r(a1 t. i
O t~~'~ o(> >jr
I iy srFU M.nN r~~ VNE dEREti I Sn^1
GOvC'f1101
STATE OF WAA. i1NGT0N
DEPARl"MENT OF TR ANSPORTATIDN
pt(rce of Drstrict Admrnrstrator • North 2714 Mayfarr Street, Boa 5249, Nortn Gentral5tatron a Spokane, Vliashrngton M05
January 21, 1983
Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson Street
Spokane, rr7ashington 9 9 2 6 0
Dear Sir:
tae have reviewed the iollo~•,Ting zone applicats.ons and have no ccAm-p-nt..s .
ZE-68-82
ZE - 9 7-$ 2/VE - 2-8 2
A-`T)E - 1206 - 78/ZE - 202 - 78
A"PS - 1254B - 78 -/ZS - 12 - 79
1-'"PE - 1366 - 8 0-/ZE - 18 - 80
t~ PS - 1399 - 80/ZS - 164 - 80
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to ccaTnrr.ant.
Veny truly yours,
TRkLTEP. R. HO.RNING, P. E.
District Adrn:ini.strator
r~
BI.' : DagLM B. WALTHER, P. F.
Design and Plans Engineer
wRH:jc
DBW
cc : Walther
Rec. Control
~
~
~
J ~
4t
~'983
Co
&
~
h~
MEM0RANDUM R ~►r Fv I V E
E
jArj i s 1983
1
T0: Spokane County Planning - Preliminary Plats SppWAtiE CO~N~
PLANNtNG DEPARTMENT ;
FROM: Spokane County Utilities
~
~
/-/~•~3 '
DATE: S U B J E C T: ~ M~N~~~~LD ~:~T CP~ ~ ZO6► ~
V ~
:
Recommendations are as circled. ~
(1) Pursuant to the Board of County Comm,issioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the '
use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authoriza- ,
tion is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the
Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to '
specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
(2) The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any peti-
tion or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local im-
provement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The
owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or pro-
test any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID)
established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. ;
~
(3) Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. (4) There are no recommendations concerning the method of sewage disposal as the
project is outside of the 201 sewer study area.
_(5) Water service as approved by the Spokane County Health District and/or the
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services.
(6) Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area- ~
wide collection systems.
~
(7) A dry sewer connection to the future North Spokane Sewerage System is to be i
constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to ~
be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to construction. ~
i
(8) Located within the Critical Water Supply Service Area but not within any j
purveyor's district. May be serviced by an individual well owned and oper- ated by lot owner. ~
~
A.AA ,
~ ~~Ar
;
i
(1o) .
' - ~
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT _
Inter-Office Communication
DATE : January 17, 1983
~.1
T0: Subdivision Ad~istrator, Spokane Count,y
FROM: Daryl E. Way~,"f~.S. - Environmental Health Division
SUBJECT: PE-1206-78 (SLTMMtRFIELD EAST ADDITIOld) - Extension of Time Reouest
Please be advised that this agency has reviewed existing file data pertaining to the
abbve subject pro,ject, and has determined that no new conditions need be recommended
by us to the Hearing £'xaminer Committee at this time. We do, however, recommend that
all previously imposed conditions be continued.
cc: Director of Utilitfes, Spokane County
R ECEIVED
JaN 17 1Qes
SPOKwNE COUNTY
PIANNING DEPARTMENT
1 ti
:
. a ' ` r~ •r ~
PLANNIlVG DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUIIDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET
~A,
PHONE 456-2205
i .~~.LI L~. Df~1
^~°r
SPOKANE, 'NASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANE COUNTY GOURT HOUSE
December 16, 1982
The Wi 11 i am Mai n Corporat i on
E. 12929 Sprague
Spokane, WA 99216
Subject: Delay of Time Extension Hearing for PE-1206 Summerfield East
Gentlemen:
We are in receipt of your time extension application form and the
$75.00 fee and had scheduled your hearing f or January 20, 1983.
Due to administrative problems and budget of department, we are
postponing this time extension hearing until February 24, 1983.
This administrative delay will not cause your approval deadline
to become effective. We are hopeful this will not be an inconvenience
to you.
If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact me as
soon as possible.
Sincerely,
=Administr John NunnerSub
division JN/rlm
cc: Wally Hubbard, Director of Planning
Inland Pacific Eng. Co.
S ~ ~ l ~~L~.~.~
t
. • ~ d- ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ Z
~
~
~ ~ .
A~ w-e.~~,...~ ~.t~,-~-- Cd~.~.~.•.~ L~ .
V, 1\.
y ~I 1 r ~
4-
~
r
• ~ v~ ~e Y' ~ 3 Q j 1ct
~ ec; ~%~.c~'.'■~' 3 Z cevw.41,,j Cr~t scJeL;rx.tL,
~
i- Gu.=C.&vae
~3'~G'~ LivL eC.(~ ~S l Vl. ~ I.Gr'~.~ ~~t,'Sv
Y
s
~ ~ ~ K~C,L' ~ H✓'W ~ W ~~..1✓~✓V ~ ` 1 ~~C V~ ~ i ~ +
ve.1+ ~e-e- 1, vt C~c ;r ~ Of L9 V ~z4-,,oo
. e ~~~o wd ~ ~ ~ • 5 146 ~ s OJ-Ctr
~
~
~ ~.,.l1.. r ~ -•,,n...~ i
~
~ • ~„~~,V,~t,,~v-~-~- - ~ r~ ~ ~ft
~t ~ •
L
~ t ^~^'i" ~y Y r ~ y _
~
^ d~5
W
a- rL'~,~~ b' r:~ ~ { •
"
~ k
~ t i r ' 3 .~J~ W
.
~
p
y ,
r.,~
r ~ u~„i
. ` ~
1
i r
DO NOT USE THIS FORM
FOR CHANGE-OF-COtyDITION
REQUEST.
PRELIMINARY PLAT
EXTENSION OF TIME FORM
Plat Number: Fri, - 1206-78 Plat Name: Rurr.lerf ield rast
Number of Lots: 266 Nwnber of Acres: 91
Sponsor: ~ym nTain C,orr)-'IDC Inc. Property Owner: <<Im ~~?ain Coxp.- TDC; Inc-
Address : F 12929 Snra,c-rue Address : T: 12929 -qnra.,r;ue
City, State, Zip: 91aokane, Wash City, State, Zip: 9noka.ne, Wa
Phone NO.: 928-1991 Phone NO.: P28-1091
Enginee r/ Surveyo r: i Inla,ncl Dacif ic T'nfr.
Address: S. 25 A1tar~ont
City, State, Zip: Srol;ane, 'ya 99202
Phoae No. 535-1410
n n n ~ i~ ~ n n ~ n n iC ~`n n n 4 ~ n i: n ~ n n :i ~ n n J. h J. '.t- J. J. J. h ~ J. n
PHASED PROJECT
(TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AND FINALIZED IN
PHASES OR STAGES)
Number of lots originally approved: 266 ~
Number of phases finalized to date:V(T•Tr, ~
~
~
Number of lots finalized to date: ~A~ - t C
r, -
~
~
Nunnber of lots remaining to be finalized: 266 ~O'~J`~
SQ
Number of acres remaining: c~1_ Q~~00%
I,egal descriptioa of property remaining to be developed and finalized
(Please be sure that the legal description excludes all phases that have
- been finalized):
'LA,~91 rlPqr.rinfiinns rena.in itn same as oriv°inallv nlatted since none oF the
a~rnvnri nhagi ncr has hpPn fi nal i7,PCi _
h i~ iin „ n iin n h n i~ ~ ia iin n i• iih iiin i• n ~ n -
Anticipated date for finalizing preliminary p1at: tJuZv 1983
- OVER -
i
Briefly summarize the progress, made to date, in preparing the plat to be
finalized (i.e., physical construction, bonding for improvements, surveying and
drafting work, accomp].ishing various departmental requirements, obtaining or
granting easements, etc.)
nr=al a.t i nn ivork 1-hat ha g 1"1Pen a~cnm»1 -i ~h~ •
DeS ~p-m and ciraf t inc~,, survec7ins~ ,vrrnznd ~vat er irlnac,t evaluafi; ion , alt ern ,~~ti ve
saVa~2:P, dxsnasal 5tudiPS, drainw.r.c stuciies . enrineerin~ renuired to ecinnlete
all reQuirerlents tolya.rds preliriinarv ulat annrnval,soil rey)orts, I'1GP.t 1Tlf?'S 10_th
L. n. A. and F, H.A, concern in.c; P;rouncl ~3at e.r. cont aria n at ion and environment re-
ouirmQDts.
Briefly state the reasoas the plat has not been finalized and/or why the plat
will require an Extension of Time (i.e., current or past problems, delays or
setbacks that may have slowed progress, economic considerations, difficulty
meeting departmental requirements, etc.):
Tirie extension is renuPSted nrlmarilv becausc: of the extensive sloxv do~~,n of
n(,~~~ r-cu~51131ction diaP tn Yl2.t 7 nl'1 "Jl fIP ponnnrn; o Por,rl-i t; on-,.h.~ r~.1i !'v rrr1L'tcu ~
the dem, and for building- lots. It is e;Prted that MI.rrent :rectuctians in
interest rates anc~ rnc~si; economi c n~r~o_i ections shoit~ favorablP ur)turn i n
construction activitv thus i"!1alri.n~ f1nalization of. -,)has;P one. a fP~~Sat)lo
reala_1:v in 1983
Signed:
r 5'ponsor/Owner/Engin~ urveyor .
s Date : ;7
/ .
DO NOT USE THIS FORM FOR CNANGE-
OF-CONDITION REQUEST.
~ - 2 -
PM-V/3-82
~
(♦t
T ~
? ° f
✓
L
. ~ r _ . d~ . ~ .....y
~~w~~~./~'Ly~t7 ~ . . ~ . . ars'• " •.~yt~,.• Y~
r ~
~ ~ ~ .
REC E I P~° Date~
~ . ~
Received From-"q.
• y✓ / J („/C~ Y
A~d ressy~~~~~~
Dol1ars
F o r
_ ACCOUNT HOW PAID WVQWU CVUAlrY PLAMj[t3C
% ~ AMT OF
ACCOUNT CASH ~
AMT PAID Cf'ECK c i
~
BAIANCE MOPJEY { B
♦ . DUE QRDER I µ 'l
~ . .
86(806 Redifprm
~ , . +~r • f : b,i_ ' _ ~ ' ' _ ' ' , a ' _ . ' • • _ • y ~ ` n . _ ,i ° . r . ; _
y T , ~ ~ ~e' ' -f 'r ~ . " , - :ry s u
~.7. ' c, . _ F 4 1 ^ o a ` • ' r
P ~ t .c!•. , ~ ry • t . ~-a • ~ . ~ ' . ' c.a ~ . - , y y r r ^t+ _ ' ° r
~f - 1• - . o+.~_
t
/ -
.~(1
N ~ . ~d ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . . c ~ _ . _ s
~ ~q( ~1 ~ ~yxip~i'• ~Y~ ~ aW ~A ~ ~ n~ ~ 4~. ~ ''L F' ~ . ~`b ` r ~ n , ~ ~ ~~il,C ~ t ~ a e' ~ > ~ Y : a Y~ _ ( ,7•~ y . v
b 'Gri ~ ~ , a n u~ • P• A. i ~ > > , ~ ~ 7 e 'y ~ 'Mi~
9 • ~ `i ~'v ~ . !
o ~ q ~ 4 . d••J~ 1 ~r'~+ ~ . ,
1r,i" ¢ i.. ~ . ' " R 7s~-0Jrw+J. ~.T(rRY ~ ` . ~ ~ p~ ~ . t [ r
. ~ t,Y , _ ~ S 4 . ~ ~ u. •
' . . i ~ a • . .
t ~ r . ' . v v~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ ~ , - ~ .~j, • ' ~
i
. T .
ML
/ . . ~ _ . _ • , u l_ ~ ~ ' - a d
'7 i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~S t r~! . . - 1 ~ y, ~ . i _ •i• » ~ . ~ ~ i' i . r - „'s1.u TY- `'?1 e • ( ^ j t r , 1 ` ~ : r '
' • i u, ' ~ .fl^,
~.ri.
)
.r
~
~
~
`j~; ~ - l~l d ~`.Y' ~ E '7 p • ra' 4 ~ ~ 'L t < a ' 9 ] ! i }i'~', ''7, s Ffi - ' z c ' ` r~ ~a i = „'r ' _ r • r 'Y s , . . ~ ' . ` .II~ t `s' - '.5~+~•r. R~ ~ ~ ,
` ~1 $ -t` ~ . ~ c W ~ t ~ ~ .c. d
,~~l~,~L~j ' •.-aie,~ s~4 ~.~.+.tr~;~ r ~i ~I ~ tt. c •a q'~ ; ~~y . l' ';1 u , ~A« :Z: ~ . i c~~ r~ ~ ~ ~ 54 ~'j~C ~~i~``1~,~',"4 A.
Ti
r c • y'~Sx~ 1, ~ r ,4 ^'~9 "3 E o d f
t
~ -
.
1
~
.
6~-AJ- ~.~.A~~ _71E1'
i,~.~
PLANi111(VG CEPARVJIENT
~ t',~' - }~••~~=_1!~" '
BROAGWAY CcNTRE 6UaLplNG N 721 JEFF; rZSUN STREET
L
°~~,ir 3 ~~~',t ?4 ONc 456-2205
SPOKf+NE, 'NASHINGT'JN 99260
SIIoKanL Coa,nz1 ccLR: r+ou5e
November 23, 1982
The William Main Corp. T.D.C. Inc.
E. 12929 Sprague
Spokane, WA 99216
COURTESY LETTER RE: Extension of Time for PE-1206-78 & ZE-202-78
SUMMERFIELD EAST
Gentlemen:
Our files indicate that the conditional approval of your preliminary
plat known as Summerfield East, will expire on February 1, 1983. The
Hearing Examiner Committee must consider and approve, in a public
hearing on Janaury 20, 1983 an application for an Extension of Time
if your preliminary plat is to remain active. The Committee may attach
additional conditions to the plat during the public hearing.
In order to process an Extension of Time, ure request that you complete
the attached form and return it no later than December 7, 1982. Please
give special attention to the last two questions on page 2 of the
Extension of Time form and be specific, since it is this information
that wi 11 formul ate reasons for approval or deni al . A fee of $75,
payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, must accornpany your application
to cover the cos-LL of the public hear7ng.
If you wish to request a"Change-of-Condition," the enclosed blue
Extension of Time is not appropriate for such requests. You will need
to make an appointment for a Preliminary Plat conference, so as to
identify the items necessary to accommodate the Change-of-Condition
application.
If I can oe of any help to you, plcase feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
John Nunnery
Subdivision administrator
JN/rlm
Enclosure
NGTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOT I CE IS H ER EBY G I V EN that the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing
Examiner Committee will hold a public hearing in the Broadway Centre Building, Second
Floor, North 721 Jefferson Street, on Thursday, January 28, 1982 at 9:00 a.m. to
consider the following :
All of the following applications will be considered individually at the January
28, 1982 Hearing of the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing Examiner Cornmittee and also
whether or not each subject proposal will have a significant adverse envir•onmental impact.
PE-1206-78 & ZE-202-78. A Hearing to consider an Extension of Time for the Preliminary
Subdivision known as Summerfield East sponsored by William Main Corp.,
E. 12720 Nora, Spokane, Washington 99216 and T. D. C. I nc. , E. 12929
Sprague, Spokane, Washington 99216. The property is described as:
Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 EWM. That portion of the NW 1/4 of
Section35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEIy of Forker
Road and SWIy of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943,
under Auditor's File No. 572309A; Also the E 112 of E 112 of SW 1/4 of said
Section; And also that portion of the W 112 of the E 112 of said Section lyiriy
SWIy of said power line easement; Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water
Company's canaf right-of-way; And except commencing at the SW corner of the
SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; thence east along the south line of said
section, a distance of 350 ft; thence north a distance of 933.42 ft; thence west
a distance of 700 ft; thence south a distance of 933.42 ft. to the south line of
said Section 35; thence east along the south line of said section a distance of
350 ft. to the point of beginning. And except Wellesley Avenue; And except
that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within Plat #4, West Farms
Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recor-ded in Volume "Q" of Plats, Pa9e 51.
PS-1362-79 & ZS-262-79. A Hearing to consider Extension ofi Time fur• Preliminary Sub-
division known as Kal-iuna Hills 1st Addition sponsored by the Kahuna Land
Co., S. 813 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington 99206. The property i:
described as: ,
Section 23, Township 25N, Range 4. That portion of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4
of Section 23, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the SW
corner of the 5E 1/4 of said Section 23; thence N 00°23109" W along the west
line thereof - 210.00 ft; then. S 89148133" E- 30.00 ft. to the point of begin-
ning of the tract of land I-ierein described; thence N 04023109" W-325.31 ft.
thence N 25008'54" E- 868.83 ft; thence S 89054'16" E- 906.92 ft; thence S
00°26'08" E- 425.22 ft; thence W 349.00 ft. thence S 00026'08" E- 70.00 ft;
thence S 63°00'00" tN - 425.00 ft; thence S 39°10'QO" W - 592.43 ft; thence N
00011128" E 36.63 ft; thence N 89048'33" W- 175.99 ft. to the point of begin-
ning.
CE288-81 "A thru D". A Heariny to considEr a denial of four Certificates-of-Exemptions
as sponsored by Patrick J. Moore, E. 12720 Nora, Spokane, Washington 99216.
The property is described as :
Section 27, Township 26, Range 41 E 1,/2 of N E 1/4 0f N E 1/4 exc E 30 ft. and
exc Co. Road.
SP-81-193. A Hearing to consider- a denial for a sfiort plat as sponsor-ed by Robert and
Lola McLellan, Rt. 1 E3ox 47, Nine Mile Falls, 1Nashinoton 9902?6. The property
is described as i
~
That portion of ~~;r~ ~ i, ~~,i ~ ~ i*u;,Li,, 1.c,~ l~jt Lo_~L 31, Township 28 North, Range 41 East W.M., Spokane County, Washington I
described as follows: I
Beginning at the northeast corner of said Section 1; thence South 0°3u iiEast along the east line of said Section 1, 2162.13 feet to the northeast corner
of Short Plat No. SP 79 - 114; thence North 89°58'26" West 476.29 feet; thence .
South 0°01'34" West 96.15 feet; thence West 823.62 feet to the west line of Lhe
East hal f of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 1; thence North 0°10'S8" West
along said west line 952.59 feet to the south line of the Northeast Quarter of
the said Northeast Quarter; thence North 89147116" East 178.59 feet; thenc;
North 22°29'04" East 1109.20 feet to the north line of said Section 1; thenc ,
• v
SP-81-193 (continued
South 89156'12" East 80.15 feet to the Southwest corner of said Section 31;
thence North 0°20'04" East along the west line of said Section 31, 400.00 feet;
thence South 89150'37" East 4202.08 feet; thence South 0°20'04" West 400.00 feet
to the south I ine of said Section 31 ; thence North 89141 `10" West along said
south line 1126.00 feet to the southwest corner of the Southeast Quarter of said
Section 31; thence North 89034'46" West along said south line 2593.50 feet to the
Northeast corner of Secfiion 1 Township 27 North, Range 40 East W. M. and the
Point of Beginning of this description.
PE-1419-81. A Hearing to consider the application by Mr. J. P. Stravens, 2110 Ironwood
Parkway, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho 83814 for approval of a preliminary plat to be
known as Liberty Point. The property located on the East side of Liberty Lake
is described as:
Tax Parcel #23554-9049 described as: Section 23, Township 25, Range 45 PTN
Lots 6& 7 DAF; beg at pt on EI sec 23 947.13ft S oF E1/4 cor th S alg E Ins
lots 6& 7 770.97ft th bU50ft th S10deg 15min Wto high water In Liberty Lake th
NW1y & Nly alg sd high water In to pt that bears 193.98ft 1N & 62.60ft S of POB
th N47deg 50min E 78ft th N86deg 07min E 136.49ft to POB together with all
shorelnds adj above desc prop exc therefrm that pt if any that ptn L7 inc
within fol desc tr; beg at pt on EI sec 23 1688.1ft S of E1/4 cor sd sec th
S30ft to pt on EI sd sec th SWIy turning an angfe of 10deg 15min to rt frm sec
In to intersec with low water (n Liberty Lake th NWly alg low water In to pt th
NEIy on In 50ft distant & par with 2nd mentioned course of this desc to a inter
with In drn frm POB at R/A to EI sd sec th Ely to POB & exc beg at 1/4 cor
secs 23 & 24 th S alg E In of sec 23 948ft m/I th 586deg 36min 30sds W 136.74ft
th 548deg 16min W 77.78ft th S8deg 24min 30sds E 50ft th S10deg 23min 30sds W
100ft th N71deg 24min SOsds E to pt on E In of sec 23 th N alg E In to POB exc
ptn of gov L7 DAF; beg aC a pt on E In of sec 15 77.76ft S of E1/4 cor & true
POB th 1N93.10ft th S23deg 10min W 194.70ft th S48deg 18min E 130ft th N10deg
15min E 127.15ft th E50ft th N140.34ft to POB.
Tax Parcel #24553-9012 described as: Section 24, Township 25, Range 45 PTN
of N1/2 of S4U1/4: beg at W1/4 cor of sec 24 th Ely alg NL of SW1/4 to WL of
Lakeside Rd th SEIy alg sd WI to engrs sta 50 plus 51.8 being pt of tang of
curve th S36deg 43min E 27ft th to rt on curve having radius of 352ft Rc C/A of
41deg 14min 247.53ft fih S4deg 31min W 253.4ft th to left on curve having radius
of 1462.5ft & C/A of 5deg 16min 67.22ft th S27deg 11 1/2min W 794.50ft to steel
sta ke on W L of sd SW1 /4 th N I y to PO B exc beg at 1/4 cor of sec 23 & 24 th
S89deg 23min 45sds E 277.33ft th S36deg 28min 30sds E 57.29ft th on curve
RAD of 352ft & central ang of 41deg 12min 45sds a distance of 253.18ft th
S4deg 44min 15sds W 177.55ft th S26deg 23min 30sds W 644.21ft th S71deg 24min
SOsds W to pt on b11 In of sec 24 th N alg W sec In to POB.
TOGETHER WITH an Easement for ingress and egress and for utilities purposes
over and across a strip of land 50 feet in width, the Easterly line thereof being
descri bed as fol lows :
Beginning aC the most Easterly corner of the above-described portion of said
Northwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 24; then North 26123'30"
East, a distance of 482.23 feet more or less, to intersect the bUesterly line of
Lakeside Road. The Westerly line of said SO-foot strip shall extend from the
Northerly line of the tract herein described to the Westerly line of said Lakeside
Road;
TOGETHER WITH an easement across, over and under the property to the
North for ingress and egress and for utilities purposes;
ALL SITUATE in Spokane County, 4Vashington.
NOT I C E I S H ER EBY G I V EN fihat the Spokane County Subdivision Hearing
Examiner Committee will view some of the sites advertised for the January 28, 1982
Hearing and shall meet in the Broadway Centre Building, Hearing Room at N. 721 Jefierson,
Spokane, Washington.
P7-A
~
r
51)0KANE VALLEq FIRE DEPARTIAENT
Vt~d X. /
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
January 21, 1982
Spokane County Planning Division R ECEIVED
Broadway Centre Bldg. 2nd Floor FEg 2 5 1982
N811 Jefferson SPOKANE CbUNl`Y
Spokane, Washington PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Attn: John Nunnery
The following preliminary subdivisions and zone
classifications for upgrading have been reviewed
for fire protection:
C.-Z-1206-78 Summerfield Estates
ZE-202-78 Wm. Main Corp. & TDC, Inc.
PS-1362-79 Kahuna Hills lst Addition
ZS-262-79 Kahuna Land Co.
PE-1419- 81 Liberty Point
The above need mains & hydrants to be installed. Access
plans for firefighting equipment around the building
shall be approved prior to building permit issuance.
' cerely ,
~
.
oug R' _r
ire ief
~
DR:sn
~ PRE VENT FIRES SAVE LI VES ~
,
~
r ~
~
* J
f ^ ~qr
,
h.
0
r
HEARINu tXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING
APPLICATION N0:-_Rff • Z IV
~
(Check one)
I would like to be on record in
jX7 FAVOR
~ r OPPOSITION
NEUTRAI
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Nearing?
~J YES
~ r NO
~
YOUR NAME: ~7 4F fZT
(please print
~
addres s : • ~ ~
HEARIti.. I cXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEAR1 "
APPL I CAT I ON NO :
(Check one)
I woul d 1 i ke to be on record i n
~ FAVOR
OPPOSITION
NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Nearing?
/ / YES
ZZ7 NO
,YOU R NAf•1E. . t< 'eo ua rl
j(please print
Address :
~
HEARII._ EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC NEARING
APPL I CAT ION NfJ : ~
(Check one)
I would like to be on record in
~ FAVOR
OPPOSITION
NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY at this Nearing?
~ Y E S
No ~
YOUR NAME : •
~
~
,(please print ?'y ~
4P'
Address :
~ ~~LO j ~ RS~~
SPOYAr,~F, COe1NI'Y HEALTH PYSTdtYG?'
JC ~ 1~LC'VI'rT L(~l~ t+~~L'' ~~i ~.t7 d L O:Y
Dp,TE January 11, 1982
2sp; Subdivision .Adaninistrator, SPokane Countv .
~
gRpM; Daryl E. Wa S. - Environmental.Health Division _
SUBJE!CT: PE-1206-78 (Summerfield East Addition Extention of Time Reau,est
Please be advised that this agency has reviewed existing file data pertaining
to the above subject preliminary plat, and has determined that no new condit-
ions need be recommended by us at this time.
cc: Director of Utilities, Spokane County
W. Main Corporation
E. 12720 ldora Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99216
TDC, Inc.
E. 12929 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99216
E C E V E
.:AN 10 198'
SPOKANE COUNTY
ScHn-AnM-118 PLA N N ING D E PA RT MEN T
41rF
~
41 ~
'°oy 1 s ~
MEMORANDUM ~i,yctiF I~98~
oF ~Oez~
T0: Spokane County Planning - Preliminary Plats
FROM: Spokane County Utilities .
DATE : I-//-8Z
S U B J E C T: 'SUMM G EF/Et-a
Recommendations are as circled.
(1) Pursuant to the Boa rd of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the
use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authoriza-
tion is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the
Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to
specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
(2) The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any peti-
tion or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local im-
provement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The
owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or pro-
test any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID)
established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
(3) Any water service for this p►°oject shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County.
(4) There are no recommendations concerning the method of sewage disposal as the
project is outside of the 201 sewer study area.
(5) Water service as approved by the Spokane County Health District and/or the
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services.
(6) Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-
wide collection systems. (7) A dry sewer connection to the future North Spokane Sewerage System is to be
constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer connection are to
be reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department prior to construction.
(8) Located within the Critical Water Supply Service Area but not within any
purveyor's district. May be serviced by an individual well owned and oper-
ated by lot owner.
. ~ -/4,040 Z'..4
(1o)
~
00"-
. ~
PRELIMINARY PLAT
EXTENSION OF TIME FORM
PI a t Number : pF_r32 ~ 7c~ P1 a t Name : ~jjmmerf i.1 d dSt
Number of Lots: 266 Number of Acres: 91
sPonsor: William Main Corp. T.D.C. Inc Property Owner: William filain T.D.C. Inc
Address: E,12929 Spraciue Address:
city, state, ziP: Spokane, !•►a 99216 city, state, ziP:
Phone No : 928-1991 Phone No :
Engi neer/Surve yor : Inl and Paci fi c. Lno.
Address: E. 12-720 Plora Avenue
city, state, z-ip: Snokane, Vkla 99216
Phone No : 922-1300
* * * * ~ * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ * *
* PHASED PROJECT *
.
* (TO BE C0MPLETED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AtVD FIeVALIZED IN *
PHASES OR STAGi,S)
* *
Number of lots originally approved: 266
Number of ghases finalzzed to date: NOnC
Number of lots finali zed to da te : flone
Number of lots rema.zning to be finalized: 266
*
Number of acres remaining: 91
Lega1 description of property remaininq to be developed and finalized
*(Please be sure that the 1ega1 description excludes a11 phases that *
have been finallzed):
Leoal descriptions remain the same as nrioinally nlatted si.nce none of the
apgroved ohasinq has been finalized.
* *
* *
* * * ~ * t * * ~ * * * * * * * * * * * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * * * * ~ * * * * * * ~
AntIc3pated date for f3nal2zang prelirrrinara p1at: JUly 1982
J
- OVER -
s
~
.
1
Briefly summarize the progress, made to date, in preparing the plat
to be finalized (i.e. physical construction, bonding for improvenients,
surveying and drafting work, accompZishing various departmental re-
quirements, obtaining or granting easements, etc.)
Prenarati on work that has been acco"inl i sh@d:Des inn and draf t'li nn, surveyi nn,
oroundwater inipaci, eval uati or,, al ternati ve se+-jarie di snosal siudi es , drai nane
-~tijdi ps, ennineeri no reou i red to campl e Ce al l reou i rement-s to~,wc,s ►wel i rni narv
plat apnroval, soil renorts.
Briefly state the reasons the plat has not been finalized and/or why the
plat wi11 require an Extension of Time (i.e. current or past problems,
delays or setbacks that may have slowed progress, economic considerations,
difficulty meeting departmental requirements, etc.):
~P ~ensi on i s recauested nri mari 1~~ because of the ex ~ensi ve sl ow dolqn of new
ConStrijrtinn cIUP to natinn widP Prnnnmir rnnd;tinnc whi(jh rirastirallv rr~rl~ir_Pc
demand for hijildi~n In-c ~t i~ P,,-npc±Pd _hat r~jrrenE rpductions in 1tliPrest
r-a-tPc anri rnnst Pr nnmir nrniPri-innc ghntti► a favnrahlp untijrii in r-nnctrilrtinn
activity thus making finalization of nhase one a feasable realitv in 19S2.
S i gn e d
t5~6_P-I*gineerlSurveyor
~ponso Date:
- 2 -
~
r
~ T_ . ~ . - ~ t..a~c'S._~ ; ~ r~ _ - i a~ : ''-'r~,~`'T~'~~*~`
t _.W.~.'.~.. . .~v-r S . \ 1 ,a yc `y~`'R ~C •r ' •r '~M~r=ti~ • ",~T.. yo ' 'Y.1 ~C ^ : f r' ' . S~ • J.,1.~~fY'
. t'tt~ > F~ ~ ~ _ x sf~ .e ' + - . tr. z ~ ~i~ i F ._t'. t - - . + y~~'GZ F : 4':9
,ta n' I v~ X ~ ~ ~ ; i•" Kn 3-~ kb ~s S r - ''s' . ~ . ~ . • ~ ~a_ , . k- : t , ~ r ~ ~ . o
~ ~'r1 ~ I f ~ ` {~1 f 1 S ~ .v P ~ ~ ~ A,1e. ^1. y ~a• 1'1, Y r~ 4 ' r _ ~J_ ~ 6 1 ^ Y ~ '
.Q` ~r ~M. ~l1~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ^ ~.`N'' y ~ ~i .Gi ~ .r ~Q ' i'y . LY ~ i ~V'A
J Y_ e V ~ . a ~ e'b ~ ~ ~ _ "L. ~.+u~' Ti ~ ~b ~t ~r} ci,.,.~ _...~t ~ 3 i ^Tti :2_:. _ - ...i' z~'+YT~:t-.~re~-~-~'.
~ ~ " ~ : p ' ~ ~ . 1*a .i a 'L' r' . ~ ~ . ' _ . „ ~ ~ " • - " ' . . /m
G l 4 2
1 !~~n~ ~ ~9.
RECEB~P°~ D a te , ~
L
. Received From ~ • ~
Ad d ress
O C!f$ $
F o r ~47
~
• - ~ ' ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAID a~ •
AMT OF COUYTY Pe.AJiNIreG
~ AtCOUNT CASH tl.
S ~ ' Ah1T PAID CHECK
BAIANCE I MONEY
DUE ORDER
~
SK806 RedifQrm
r
• '
,
~ W0*
AGENDA, January 29, 1981 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
TIME: Thursday, January 29, 1981 - 9:00 A.14.(Item #1 on Morning Agenda)
PLACE: Sroadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APdD ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSIOPJ OF TIME
PE-1 206-78, SUh1MERF IELD EAST .
ZE-202-78, AGRICULTURAL TO R-1
a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the
Spokane Valley adjacent to and north
of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road
and east of Bannen Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 EWN
That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section
35, in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEIy of
Forker Road and SWIy of the power line easement as recorded on
January 19, 1943, under Auditor's File No. 572309A; Also the
E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said Section; And also that portion
of the W 112 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SWIy of said
power line easement; Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water
Company's canal right-of-way; And except commencing at the SW
corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section; thence east
along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 ft; thence
north a distance of 933.42 ft; thence west a distance of 700 ft;
thence south a distance of 933.42 ft. to the south line of said
Section 35; thence east along the south line of said section a
distance of 350 ft. to the point of beginning. And except
Wellesley Avenue; And except that portion of the NW 1/4 of said
section lying within Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per
plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51.
c. Sponsors: W.Main Corporation & TDC, Inc.
E 12720 Nora Avenue E 12929 Sprague Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99216 Spokane, WA. 99216
d. Engineer: I.P.E.C.
E 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99216
e. Si te Si ze: 91 acres
f. Number of Lots: 266
g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural
i. Proposed Zoning: R-1
j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3
k. School District: East Valley #361
1. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Impact: A proposed declaration of non-
significance (a preliminary decision,
which may be reversed, that an environmental impact statement, an
EIS, is not needed) has been administratively issued. This in-
sures the applicant of a timely processing of his/her proposal at
the time of the public hearing. BUT, a major purpose of the
public hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the
- 1 -
~ .
~
PE-1206-789 SUMMERFIELD EAST
decision makers with information as to whether or not a potential
SIGrIIFICANT ADVERSE impact upon the physical environment will
result from implementation of the proposal, thus resulting in the
need for an EIS. However, all "extensions of time" and most
"change of conditions: are exempt from the provisions of SEPA;
check with the Planning Department staff if uncertainty exists.
n. Applicant is requesting a Time Extension until February 1, 1982.
~ •
• '
C' a
A(AI
~
- ~ ; ~ ~ _ _ - - - - - - - ,
EL Z041L:,
, , .
' . I .
Q
i'A ~
C ~
1 W 100/
G
M Q ; O~ r....., I! • /
ai o~ ~E a s t E a s t ~
t
~V' Q \/Qll@y VGil} rY
' w v Z ~
a
,
~ W ~ 's J r. H ig h ~ iq h S cho~o l{
4 w, T entwpc)d fli ~ SCh001 • : Pa.~ .
-cc"~.. jaci 9 wc, 14a b-s ger" SchCni WELLESLEY : vb .
C
116 Ii- 1',~ e~ ~ cr 143 14ti 145 14E , t 151 152 i.l~3 Ir.tt is• i c.
hIENO`r 7 Q ~ M:;~(,r f.• ?
. ~ } a•~v = 3 ~
N
~ ~ ~ t. Q ~ 1► ( ~ ~ + /~1
± /e~.a.ovr41
J
> f" L.r~ F E _ ~f~i. ~
W y'
; W zi
Ri C r A.vE
E
G•~ C ~ 7 ~ ~ ~ y~ ~ - o
LaJ
, - ~ u,{ n t a s J
C
' ~ t l . - ~ y• 4
f ~i • t y Qr • r
, -z \ r- ~ Ec ~oa,
Q , , . .
J ~ • ~ , ' r
^M 1
y y • ♦ • ~ ~ • - 1 1 ~ t
Rr.~.....~~rr'2 OZ6 5 rF,410~ - ' . . . << < _ , t~. aN~ i
~ . ~
- - \ ' ` - ~ _ ` , - ~
R ~
~TN ^
`
• ` ,
`
~
- I f1 ~
„
.
~ - , 1 y000,
+ w • I i N ! 1 a I / x 4'
h y
STAFF ANALYSIS - January 29, 1981
PE-1206-78, SUMMERFIELD EAST
ZE-202-78, AGRICIJZTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R-1)
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. History
The proposal was approved on January 30, 1979 by the Hearing Examiner Commit-
tee and has been planned to be developed in phases. To date, no phases have
been finalized, although the county departments are reviewing a submittal for
phasing containing 86 lots. The sponsor is working with the school district
in attempting to satisfy their concerns along with problems with FHA concern-
ing the method of sewage disposal and economic conditions have delayed finali-
zation of the first phase. The sponsor is therefore requesting a time exten-
sion until February 1, 1982.
B. Location
The Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley, more specifically, adjacent to and
north of Wellesley Avenue,west of Progress Road, south of Forker Road and
east of Bannen Road. '
C. Proposal
- 91 acres subdivided into 268 lots for single family use
- Lot frontage = 80'
- Lot sizes = 10,000 sq. ft.
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
A. Circulation
The County Road Engineer has not recommended any new conditions. Only those
• conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record but have in-
dicated this project is subject to the provisions and fee schedules of the
Engineer's Department as adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on
December 22, 1980. -
B. Sewage Disposal
Temporary use of individual on-site systems is authorized until an area-wide
sewerage system is available. Dry sewerage lines are to be installed within
the plat. " -
C. Drainage _
The County Engineer reports that the final construction plans must be reviewed
and approved prior to the filing of the final plat.
~ - 1B -
T
STAFF ANALYSIS - January " 1981 ,UMMERFIELD EAST - coatinued
4
D. Water Supply
The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Trentwood Irriga-
tion District #3.
E. Fire Protection
The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection
District #1.
F. Schools
The proposal lies within the boundaries of East Valley School District #361.
III. CONDITIONS:
If approval is granted, the following coaditions are recommended.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1. Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
2. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to
review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject
_ the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies.
3. That a time extension be granted to February 1, 1982.
ENGINEER DEPARTMENT
1. This preliminary plat is subject to the provisions of Attachement "C" - Fee
Schedule Office of the County Engineer - pursuant to Board of County Commis-
sioaers Resolutioa #80-1592 of December 22, 1980.
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
1. Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the use
of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authorization is
conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the Spokane County
Health District and is further conditioned and subject to specific application
approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
2. The owner, his heirs and successors shall join and participate in any petition
or resolutioa which purpose is the formation of a utility local improvement
district (UI,ID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The owner, his
heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or protest any legal
- assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID) established
pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended.
3. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plaa for Spokane County.
4. Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-wide
collection systems.
- 1C -
. ~
STAFF ANALYSIS - Januar! 9, 1981 SUMMERFIELD EAST - continued
~ ~
5. A dry sewer system is to be constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry
sewer have been reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department.
- 1D -
~ ; *
. 5POKANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTIAENT
641- /
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
.Tanuary 26, 1981
Wally Hubbard Hearing Date: 1/29/81
Plat Administrator
Spokane County Planning Commission
N721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Mr. Hubbard,
The following preliminary subdivisions and zone
classification for upgrading have been reviewed
for fire protection:
i/ PE-1206-78 Sumrnerfield East
ZE-202-78 W. Main Corporation & TDC, Inc.
PE-1363-79 Prosser Addition
ZE-264-79 Byers
PE-1392-80 Homestead Townhouses
PUDE-3-80 W. Main Corporation
The above need mains and hydrants to be installed in
the areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment
around the building shall be approved prior to building
perrnit issuance.
/'-Sli,ncerely,
,
~
dug ider
- Fir Chief
DR:sn
R ECEIVED
JAN 2g 1981
SPOKtK tOUNt'Y
PLA"tNG OEPARTMENT
PREVEIVT FIRES SA VE LI VES J
~ .y .
OFFICE Of COUNTX ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Qpte ,januarv 8th= 019 81 _
Ietw-office Communication
jo__S.p&ane County Planning Department
f rorn-CaunrT F n glnppr,! gDe oa r tmgn t ,
Subject p$ 1206 Summerfield East (1
The above referenced plat has been scheduled for an "Extension of Time Hearing" on
January 29th , 1981. The Couaty Engineer's Department has reviewed
the plat and finds that the "Conditions of Approval" which were required by the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner and/or the Board of County Comcnissioners are still applicable
a nd should be required as a condition in granting the extension of time.
The above referenced plat shall be subject to the provisions of Attachment "C" - Fee
Schedule Office of the County Engineer - pursuant to 8oard of County Commissioners
Resolution 80-1592 of 22nd December, 1980.
r ~
l ~ MEMORANDUM
T0: Spokane County Planning - Preliminary Plats
FROM; Spokane County Utilities 4.
ICEIVE
lixR D
DATE: 7_go/
SUBJECT: SNMA%eR~14FLp E"T Pe -l2oG-78 JAN 8 1981
SPOKANE CQUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Recommendations are as circled.
Q Pursuant to the Board of County Commissioners Resolution No. 80-0418, the
use of on-site sewer disposal systems is hereby authorized. This authoriza-
tion is conditioned on compliance with all rules and regulations of the
Spokane County Health District and is further conditioned and subject to
specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District.
Q The owner, his heirs or successors shall join and participate in any peti-
tion or resolution which purpose is the formation of a utility local im-
provement district (ULID) pursuant to RCW Chapter 36.94, as amended. The
owner, his heirs and successors shall further agree not to oppose or pro-
test any legal assessments for any utility local improvement district (ULID)
established pursuant to RCW Chapter 36,94, as amended.
Q Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the
Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County.
(4) There are no recommendations concerning the method of sewage disposal as the
project is outside of the 201 sewer study area.
(5) Water service as approved by the Spokane County Health District and/or the
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services.
~ Each dwelling unit shall be double plumbed for connection to future area-
wide collection systems.
O A dry sewer System is to be
constructed. Plans and specifications for the dry sewer 40 have 6eeN
4e reviewed and approved by the Utilities Department,
(8) Located within the Critical Water Supply Service Area but not within any
purveyor's district. May be serviced by an individual well owned and oper-
ated by lot owner.
(9)
(10)
PRELIMINARY PLAT
EXTENSION OF TIME FORM
PZat Number: PE-1206-78 P1at Name: Sumnerfield East
Number of Lots : 266 lvumber of Acres : 91
sponsor : TDC Propert y owner :Mercedes Jeske, Faye E11 i ot
E. 12929 Sprague c/o Roger Moore
Aaaress : Address : ONB Trust Department
Snokane, 14A 99216 W. 423 Riverside
City, state, zip: City, state, zip: Spokane, WA 99201
Phone 1vo : 928-1991 Phone No :
!lilliam Main Investment Co. Engineer/Surveyor: Inland Pacific Enqineering & Construction
N. 8601 Division Street Corp.
Spokane, WA 99208 Adaress : E. 12720 Nora Avenue
4~9-0630
city, state, zip: Spokane, HA 99216
Phone No : 922-1300
* ~ * * * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * ~ * * ~ ~ * * * ~ * * * * ~ * ~ *
* PHASED PROJECT *
*(TO BE COMPLETED ONLY IF THE PLAT IS BEING DEVELOPED AND FINALIZED IN *
PHASES OR STAGL'S)
* *
Number of lots originally approved: 266
*
Number of ghases finalized to date: None
*
Number of lots final i zed to da te : None
* *
Number of lots rema.zning to be finali zed : 266
Number of acres remaining: 91
* - *
Lega1 description of property remaining to be developed and finalized
*(Please be sure that the 1ega1 description excludes a11 phases that *
have been finalized) : See FXhiblt "A"
* • *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * ~ ~ * * * ~r * * * * ~ ~ ~ * * * * * * ~ * * * * ~
Anticipated date for f3nalizing preliminary p1at: January, 1991
(first ohase)
- ovER
-
I
.
Briefly summarize the progress, made to date, in preparing the plat
to be finalized (i.e. physical construction, bonding for improventents,
surveying and drafting work, accomplishing various departmental re-
quirements, obtaining or granting easements, etc.)
All that remains to secure finalization of the first phase final nlat is bonding
for i mprovements and resol vi nn the nrobl em of deterrii ni ng !qho wi 11 provi de
mai ntenance for the 1 o' v►al kways providi ng access from the nl at to the Trentwood
Elementary School Site. All other surveyinq, drafting, and engineering work for
th1s ~nitl.al fi.nal olat has been comnleted and aqnroved.
Brief.Iy state the reasons the plat has not been finalized and/or why the
plat wi11 require an Extension of Time (i.e. current or past problems,
delays or setbacks that may have slowed progress, economic considerations,
difficulty meeting departmental requirements, etc.):
-It was alwa\/s.lntended that Summerfield East would he develoned and finalized in
nhases or stages over aperiod of several vears. The economic conditions of the
oast year and resolution of problems with FHA concerning method of seviage disposal
for the nlats have delayed finalization of the first ohase plat.
~ .
S i g n e d,:
Sponsor/Owne.lr/Engineer Surveyor
. Date.
~ ! - 2 -
\
r
~
r
RECEIPT Date..~~. -2z 1Q4'0 7--~5 ~
_ Received From ~ca.~w Con.~pQ~,,,~-,'o-~.~ P
Address C Ix720 l\tcr%e.? S~oLC.~•-c.., lnl Ar - ~~L! 6 r
Dol (a rs $
FO I' -eL-X4 e4,4n'0N.,/ I Z 0 ~6 g i
~j~vvvwPi~ ' UJC'
ACCOUNT ~ HOW PAID
CQ~ ~~~ING DEPggTMF~
Accou~T I (v ~ cnsH I I. ~ r
AMT PAID ~ + I CHECK
~ BA CE MONEY
DUE ~ I I OR ER ~ u ~Q
~ y
r y +J
8K806 R•°l►'"
-s '
PN
1EXHIBIT "A"
Legal Description
Prel iininary Plat Suanerfield East
That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, T. 26 N., R. 44 E.W.M., in
the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying southeasterly of
Forker Road and southwesLerly of the power line easernent as recorded
on January 19, 1943, under Audi tor's F ile No. 572309A;
ALSO the E 112 E 112 SW 1/4 of said section;
aND ALSO that portion of the 14 1/2 of the E 112 of said section lying
southwesterly of sa i d nowe►, 1ine easement;
EXCEPT the Spokane Valley Land & Water Coinpany's canal right-of-way;
AND EXCEPT conmeric ing a L the southwes t corner of the southtves t guarter
of the southeast quarter of said section; thence east along the south
line of said section, a distance of 350 feet; th@nce north, a distance
of 933.42 feet; thence west a distance of 700 feeL; thence soutn a
distance of 933.42 feet to the sout}i 1 ine of said Section 35; thence
easC along the south line of said section, a distance of 35C feet, to
the point of beginrling;
AyD EXCEPT Wellesley Avenue;
At1D EXCEPT that portion of th,e MW 1/4 of said section lying within
Pl at #4, rdes tFar-rFis I rri ga ted TracLs as per p1 at thereof recorded i n
Volume "°0" of Plats, Page 51. `
eo
t.yt wAsi,l~ OeA
h G ) .
;
/ ' l~ L ~ y \ ~ • 1
~
~
~ 41
JJ,v Cc
Is r L
,
~IAt LM
82
~ U.S. E~'_'IRONMENTAI PROTECTIr'--y AGENEY
~
. REGION X
• _ J~~~E~ ST,~r~S vb~
2„~ ~ :yJ 1200 SIXTH AVENUE ~t/►1~ ,
~ SEATTIE, WASHINGTON 98101
o
2
O
;~yr.1
~ DJ
[ pRpIE&
REPIY TO C? 1979
ATTN OF: t~/S 409 SPOKANrr. COUNiY
~ pLANti~sNG DEPARTMENT
I+I~! 1 . _ .
h1r. R. C. Bri nck
Service Office Supervisor
Department of Housing and
Urban Development
West 920 Riverside Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear Mr. Brinck:
This is a follow-up to rrly May 22 letter regarding Summerfield East
Subdivision, S. P. #415. We have evaluated the HUD Special Environ-
mental Clearance and have concerns regarding the project's impact on the
Spokane Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer. Therefore, this letter con-
tains the conditions for approval of this project.
EPA's two concerns regarding the project, namely treatment of domestic
waste and disposal of urban runoff, are summarized below:
The first concern is treatment of domestic waste. I understand that
. individual septic tanks with dry sewers will be used. The housing
density is high and the project is located in the fringe area (area of
low flows) of the Aquifer. Therefore, it will be necessary that a
Ground Water Impact Assessment (GWIA) be prepared to address the impact
to the Aquifer during the interim prior to connecting to a sewage treat-
ment plant. To accomplish this it would be necessary to have a realistic
estimate from local agencies regarding their expectation of the time
schedule for sewers. The GWIA must be prepared by a geohydrologist or
soil scientist and address the ability of the soil system to protect the
Aquifer (expecially from nitrates and bacteria) and possible mitigating
measures. A monitoring program instituted by the applicant may be
necessary, based upon the findings of the EPA review of the GWIA.
The second concern we have is the control of urban runoff. The Spokane
208 Study has concluded that urban runoff is contributing contaminants
to the Aquifer. We believe the best control approach is dispersal and
retention of all runoff (100%) on the land surface so as to maximize the
. , ,
• .
. • .
. 2
ability of the topsoil to treat contaminants. The surface soils are the
most bacteriologically active area, contain finer material for ionic
-reaction and support the root-zone which is capable of removing pollutants.
Therefore, to control urban runoff, the following mitigating measures
must be employed: .
l. Where feasible, individual lots shall be designed and lanscaped
in a fashion which maximizes the retention of runoff on the property
(topsoil) or disposal to grass percolation areas. Restrictive covenants
shall be instituted to guarantee that the grass percolation areas (e.g.
drainage easements) will be maintained and operable. No water shall be
piped directly to streets or dry►qells. The proportion of runoff which
could be handled this way must be estimated, and as an objective to be
achieved no less than 80% of the increased runoff above the natural
existing flow is to be controlled on-site.
2. The use of drywells for the disposal of runoff from impervious
areas (e.g. streets and parking lots) shall be minimized and used only
when there are no better alternatives. The proportion of runoff to be
handled this way must be estimated with no more than 20% of the flow
from these areas handled this way.
3. If curbs or gutters are used, the collected flow must be dis-
persed to grass percolation areas or to a sewage treatment plant. The
proportion of runoff must be estimated with no less than 80% of the flow
handled this way. Also, where feasible, street sweeping or vacuuming
with disposal in an approved landfill shall be employed.
4. The preliminary runoff control plan shall show where catch
basins and s pray irrigation on golf courses and other public lands can
be used for runoff disposal. It should, if possible, include a prelimi-
nary approval by the County Engineer of the concept and an agreement by
an appropriate county agency to be responsible for the operation and
maintenance of any retention/land application system. The proportion of
runoff to be handled in this fashion must be estimated.
5. Certification is required from a licensed engineer that the
above runoff control measures were instituted.
6. As previously mentioned, monitoring may be important and we
request the Federal agency or applicant to, assist us in collecting
effluent samples for EPA analyses for selected substances.
7. The GWIA must discuss the ability of the soils to treat any
contaminants in the runoff.
, .
,
3
I hope these requirements are expressed to the applicant as condltions
for EPA approvai. Your concern and interest in protecting the Aquifer
is appreciated. If you need additional information please contact us.
_ Si ncerely,
~ C~~~s/Gt •
William A. hlullen, Chief °
Drinking Water Programs Branch
cc: ✓Sose Urcia, Spokane Regional Planning
Conference, A-95 Clearinghouse
Ral ph Mi 1 I er, VA, Seatti e
Warren Ness, FmHA, Wenatchee
- r•
.
U.. ENVIRONMENTAL PROT!' TION AGENCY ^ -
~
E O s r q r ' R E G I O N X ~ - ~
Fs
1200 SIXTH AVENUE
~
SEATTLE, WASNINGTON 48101
~yr,t vAOtCG1
! REPtY TO
ATTN OF: M/ S 409
JUL 3 1979 .
Mr. R. C. Brinck
Service Office Supervisor Department of Housing and
Urban Development
West 920 Riverside Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear tlr. Brinck: •
This is in reference to my June 1 and June 15 letters regarding the
Summerfield East Subdivision, SP #415. Attached is a copy of the analyti-
cal data for nitrates from we11s in the general area of the proposed
project. The data indicate the water quality in portions of the Aquifer
adjacent to and downgradient from the project site is close to the
Maximum Contaminant Level of 10 mg/1 for nitrates.
EPA's approach in reviewing this and all other housing projects during
the interim until the Spokane 208 Plan is approved and Management Agency
Implementation Statements (MAIS) are finalized is the following:
1. Approve projects which conform to the May 1979 Spokane 208
Plan, unless -
(a) The project is to be located in an area where the mQst
recent nitrate-nitrogen water quality data is 6 mg/1 or greater.
(b) There is a pubiic petition with supporting substantial
informat:on showing the proj ect may cause a significant hazard
to pu51 i c hea lth . a va i i d pec~Lion may ,jusii fy a puo i i c
hearing.
Projects which fall under items 1(a) or (b) would need a Ground Water
Impact Assessment (GWIA) prepared to address the impact to the Aquifer
during the interim prior to connecting to a sewage treatment plant. To
accompl i sh thi s i t woul d be necessary to have a rea7 i sti c estimate from
local agencies regarding their expectation of the time schedule for
sewers. The GWIA must be prepared by a geohydrologist or soil scientist
and address the ability of the soil system to protect the Aquifer (espe-
cially from nitrates and bacteria) and possible mitigating measures. A
monitoring program instituted by the applicant may be necessary, based
upon the findings of the EPA review of the GWIA.
, Z .r
Therefore, based upon the recent water quality data EPA approval for the
Summerfield East Subdivision SP #415 is contingent on the conditions of
my June l, 1979 letter.
' I appreciate the extra review time for this project. If you need additional
;information please call me or Harold Scott.
,
Si ncerely, .
Wi 11 i am A. P1ul 1 en , Chi ef
" Drinking Water Programs Branch
• cc:~Jose Urcia, Spokane Regional Planning
Ral ph Mi 11 er, VA
- Wa rren Nes s, FmHA
0
• UNITCO STATES ENVIROHMENTAL P ECTION ACcNCY
DATE: Jil1 .1 1979
sueJEcT= EPA Ni trate Analyses for "Sol e Source" Aqui fer
o, ea. 4 ~ ~h -/c.,
FROM: arol d M. Scott
, z Drinking Water Programs Branch
To: Sole Source File: Summerfield East Subdivision, S.P. #415 •
The application to the Department of Housing and Urban Development for
federal financial assistance for the Summerfield East Subdivision, S.P.
#415 project was sent to EPA by the Deot. of Housing and Urban Development
for revi ew under the "sol e source" aqui fpr program. The proJect i s
planned for Section 35 Township 26N, Range 44E.W.h1., and would include
91 acres with 266 homes un septic tanks and construction of dry sewers
for eventual connection to a sewage treatment plant. On April 5, 19799
we requested additibnal review time until July 5, 1979 and HUD concurred
in a letter mailed June 21, 1979. The extra time was needed to collect
and analyze water samples for nitrate in the project area, and to respond
to the project in light of the recent Spokane 208 Plan.
Four water samples were collected June 26, 1979 by Mr. Dennie Byram
(Spokane County Health District). Samples were iced and shipped to the
EPA Region 10 Laboratory and Mr. Phil Davis, Chemist, reported the
following analytical data to me by telephone on June 29, 1979:
EPA Lab. No. Wel1 Location Nitrate-Nitrogen mg/1
26040 Trentwood Irrigation Dist. #3, 3.3
well #3: SW, SE, SE Section #35
T26N, R44EWM, 140 ft.
26041 Trentwood I.D. #3, well #1: 2.3
SE, NW, NE Section 2
T25N, R44EWM, 127 ft. (This weil will be shut down during
the s~~er becaus- r.1ater tabl o
drops below the pump intake)
26042 Joe Danelos' private irrigation 7,8
we11 : NE, SW, SW Secti on 35, T26N,
R44E1JM, approx. 140 ft.
26043 Trentwood I.D. #3 well #4: SW, 6.3
NW, NE Section 3, T25N, R44EWM,
depth 120 ft.
cc: Phil Davis, EPA Reg. 10 lab.
Dennie Byram, Spokane County Health Dist.
EPA FORM 1320-6 IREV. 3-761
. _ ~ " _ _ . - .s~ . . _ _ _ . " • ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i _~i1 ~T ~
~
oa~~
QIALITY FENCE CO.~ llice 157Ib E. SPRAG~ME YER~IDI~LE. wA 49037
(S09) 928-7777 RHON E
SUBMITTED 7O
AadRE55 2iP
eIT,r s-rATE
Jt7B LQCATI[}N
. v.Yt~s....ti....._......n......a.ea~ae....yi..at.....1'ati......._.~.~.~...s-~.~.. ~:....,,.,.-.._y ......ar............,.. y
5PEG1F I+GA1`ROMa , ;
: W : _ • . , .
o _t„_.........
T{2TAL F{3[]TA+GE
TC]TAL MIE IC,hfT - . . . . ,....,.x _..a
,
STYLE FEINCE G.---..' : :..._.r.~.,~....~ , , ,
{
~ PO'ST SPACE D.. ~
F. . .>....,.q~,.... d. _...t..._ - -i.-.....r. -•_-i..,... r
7r`RE 4iAV#iE
~ ~ .
.
. i .
ICIwl1CKLED . ,
BA~~~D 13 ......,e,»...{..,.e..:,-.,..{...-..,...."'y..'_'_ .,,~...._.,;...__.a._....,~.....-i....,.,p...."~""'..c.. ....r}....
r ~ . • . . . .
, ~ . . •
. , . • . . .
TpP RAIL
y• . ~ ....bo-.. . . .
................»,.r...----•-•--~ . ..i........_ . ~
LFFdE p'OST_ _ . , .
EMO PQS7 _ . . .~ti ~ ...._x _..._r.- - - ~
a
, , . , . , . , . . ; . . , ,
.
CORNER P[?S7 ..;e__..~.;.......~ , , .._..a_....-~------;.
, , - . . ~ - - -
. , , . . .
wALK GArE POsr ~
. .
. .............~..,.,.,;<...._i_,....,......... ,:,...,.......a...... {.......c,..,..,}._..... ,
; ' -
DRIVE GA7E Pt7sT
's
, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ;
a • ~ - • ~ ~ °
~ • • .
iCAT€ FRAME'S ~ :
.
~ . . . . - , ~ .
, . _ . . ; . ,
• ~ .a.....s...
GRADE , .
, . . , . „ . ,
. .
, .
` '
y.~t. . . _ ~ . . r y
AtRLINE C) LEVEL C3 . „ ' - .,~1..
S"fEPREU fl fiROl..IN[7
1...- ,..«j.,... s..... f~~.. ..,-.d;.............. + .y, ...rr ..Y ....n~.
CONTOUR ;
PROPERT'h` IC]1A+NER hS 5()I-ELY RESPON- t.... , L ....ti..... ~
SIBLE FO#t L.t7C+4TdN+G STaKlNG ANp
. .
.,,.r , . .y.~.. F
GI..EA1iINVG l,hNL5. SITE READY A1VY TIIMIE . . . :
lhFTE~t • ~ , ; ~ ~ 1 ~ ~
~ ,;~.~~.~,~_.s
.
.4.., ;~~......a, t....,. e,....
. ,
, . . , . . ,
~ , , . .
N4TE= TMis PrQposel may bs wrt!hdcawn by us
. . . i , • : ~ •
. . • . ~ f.
_ ' 1........'.....~;L..r..ti:.-r~mti*-~r.vx•.:rr+Yh.1r..wx.ye~aMOta:..41Yls~.Jau.~~..~ ...iA-. ~..1.... .d..,,....F:,....At...,..j....,.~Ji.rv...^rr'
iC nut aCeepted wi[hin daYs,~,,,,~.,.. , . , . . . .
CQaNTRACT COHDITI[3N5 T E FU45
i MURE CDR LF-S51'-1A'1"ER1AL L3"1"HEli TF#A!V A!"ICFUIVT +CONTR+4CTE[) F:011 WILL CASH UPC}N COMPLETIOhI ~ BA1+11C C)
BE OE$IT'E{1 OR CREpITED A"I' ClJRflEhlT R,ATE. O7HER - SRECiFY
ACCEPTAG+lCE -The ahove praposal vvherr accCRtGd by thG Compalr+}r. at its inPteon _
oiFice, becornes a concracx betwear+ twa ipartira and +s nat subjact so canceiation. - r ~
$ilanca on 4he part cf t~e Compaa,y allall not ba cernstruF+d es an a+eceiscaflee af
thI s prapo seM. In case Payment ls nat rtaade aa specifie-d i n (Tenms o# Rayment) [
the Ccimpeny reserve* the r;gh[ tn rapoaseys all materis[a used on thl i jab widnout
raCO u r ser. -
PFtC]PEFITY O'NNER agrees that tht Company wi H not be hes3d res0+nnsible or -
li.aCSfe for arry dumbge of angr nacLore ta umdersnaund obstructrans.
NOTfCE If contract is changed a/ter the lrCcli4n GrCw delrvers the rnatarinl.
There wM he S S7.50 per haut charge for cime Nost.
li contracc rs canceled a 10"h d+arga of th+s EoIsl c7ntrp+G[ Pri cra wfll be charged.. ~
If saFd piropertx owner d!ef$ulu in any of the ebovet paYment~ when due. nr br~ar-hes - ~
ar+y of the pnoviaYans af this contract the Cornpany may. at its aprian, withaue pre- ~
viaus derttand or notrce, enter uPon [hB Premises of tho pmVerty owner 8nd r+etako I
PasSdssion of said ddacrybcc#prvParcy and r-ause said Rropcrsy [o be soit1 and
credit the property owner with the Rroceeds and Che pro0er;y owner shaRl bes liabJe
for thc belbnce of rFae vnnxract prkce. The Corripsr+r w^ill not be responsihle for dny TAX ~
darnage tn che propercx be+[aufe of the renoval oP the materoal uyed on xhw3 pob, ~
WHEN xN A,IR COMPRESsaFt 8~ JAC#c HAMI~~R ARE NF-EUED IN ~ IN THE EVENT TMAT IT RECOMES NECES5AR1' FOR
aoCKr sOIL AN ADDrTiONAL 3S0,00 cHARGE wiLL BE AnDED. QUALITY FENCE TO RETAIN THE SERVICES OF AN
ATTORNEY fiO ENFORCE THE TERMS tJF THE CON-
ALL O~~TRUC7It3N5_ MuST BE CLEARF-b PRIOR TO ARRlvAL TRACT, THEhJ PURCHASER EXPRESSLY AGREES 1'O
vF WORK CFtEW OR A►N ,ADDITFONJ1L C14ARGE C1F $25.00 PER PAY THE REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES NECES=
'NouR wILL BE CwARGEa. , SARILY INCIJRRED.
UNDERGROIJNCi UTILlTIES PfliR '1'O4JF1, PRp'TECTIQN
~ IF YES. WFiJkT '1fES N~7 t~W '~AYMENTS T~1 ,~S. l}SE CHECIC (3R MOI^VEY iQFiDE!R i~AYAB'L€
~ j TC) CC3'MPJraNY A.5 SWi71AliW ON IiEA[)ah,IG C)F fiHi$ SAL~S CON"I`R,+aCT.
SALESM/N , ACCEP T£ D _
~ ACCFmPTEC3 FCIR TFiE COMF"ANY
. ,
~ . , • .
~ 1'i.in~mmorit;n TFartsaFner'~ ~ { ittti {n~urnnCU C:ot ,y . . . .
~ 1 itle InsuranCe ScrVit,..i ntoiih 720 A►qo«no ..irf .
v,.Q ~w•s~ , • Sp0E:nno,ltJ:131iinglan 99201B .
(509) 922•2222
r
. . . A. -
--THIRl)
CF.RTIFiCATE TO PLt1T
~Order No.:97855-M
.
; CerCi.ficate for Filing Proposed
-Plat of SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION
~
Spokane County Planning Comrnission
N. 721 Jef.ferson Spokane, Washington Gentlemen: In the matter of the Plat submitted for your apProval, tllis Company
has examined the records of the County Auditor a.nd County Clerk of
Spokane County, I-Jashington, and the records of the Clerlc of the
United States Courts holding terms a.n siiid County, and from such
examination hereby certifies tlzat the Citle to the f_ollowing des.cribed
land siCuate in Spokane County, to-wit: ,
Aparcel of land in the South half of Section 35, Townsh.ip 26 North,
Range.44 E.W.M., being more particularly described as follows: ,
.
Beginning aC the 5outh quarLer corne-r of Section 35; thence South
89 ° 52' 00" Wes t along the South line of the Southwes t quarter o'f
- said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60
feet in `aidth a distance of 661.05 feet; thence North 00°05'38"-West,
a dis tance of 30 . 00 f cE~t to the Plortherly margin of Welles ley Avenue and
True Point of Beginriing ot this description; thenee North 00°05'38" West
along the East baunclary of PLAT N0. 4 OF' WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS,
as*per plat thereaf recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 51, a distance
of 1121.63 feet; thence North 62°23'41" East, a'distance of 192.97
fEet; thence North 40°31'S9" E1st, a distance of 48.01 feet; thence
North 65°56'49" L'ast, a distance of 128.00 feet; thence South 46°13'24"
East, a distance oF 114.31 feet; thellce East o. distance of 469.10
feet ; t:hence North 79 ° 35' S6" East, a dis tance of 133 . 39 feet ; thence
South 56°39'30" East, a distance of 63.63 feet; thence North 74°28'06",
East, a distance of 128.00-feet; thence South 13°55' 30" Eas-t, a.distance
of 75.19 €eet; thEnce South 89°56'40" East, a distance of 36.43 feet;
thence Sourh 00°03'20" tlest, a distance of 123.00 feet; thence South 36°02'26" East, a disCance of 54.45 feet; thence SoutA 00°03'20" [Jest,
a d.istance of 123.00 feet; trience'South 89°56'40" East, a distance
of 375.09 feet ; thence South- 00°25' 19" jJest, a distance of 560.01 feet;
thence North 89°56'4.0" West, a distance of 342.67 feet; thence South
00°43'20" West, a distance of 133.00 feet; thence South 06°17'44"
tlest, a distance of 44.26 feet; thence South 00°03'20" West, a distance
Pc~ge 2
Orrier iNo. 91$55-r1
THIR.D CEF.T. TO PLAT
of 143.0.0 feet 'to the Nor,therly m2Tgin o.'f Welles]:,ey Aven.ue, as
i,t now E.xists 60 feet in wicith; -th:ence Nar,th 89056.'40" Wes:t alorig
said No rtherly ma.rgin a ciis.tance o.f 274 , y_8 feet; thence ~North aclistanc~e o,.~- :903.42- fee.t; thence tles.t a distance of 700.-0.0 feet; .
th'enc.,e South a cl,istaiice o-f 9'0 3.. 90 f*eet to s aid Nor-therl-y nmrgin of
iVellesl.ey A-venue; thenc,e South 89°52'Q'0" West alon~g said Nor.therly
r~rg;in a d~isC.~.nce of 311.10 feet t°o the T'rue Point of l3eginning.
of t.his descrip-tion;
Situate in the County o.f Spokane, State bf 'CJas2l;:ng,ton, VESTED ZN: OI:D NA1'IONAL I3ANK OF 14ASHINGTON, a nac:.ional ba~nking
associa:tion, as. 'rrustee under agree;ment,wiCh `Faye S. Ell-iotr '
da ted Sep tember 28, 19 7.2 and MLRCEDCS JE-~S-KE, a marriecl woman,-as her
sole and separate pxoperty.
EXCEPTIQ,NS
l. General taxe:S- fo.r th,e year 1930 and p:rior years. delinq:uent in
the ama.unt of $503.,02 and $5'96.97", respectively, plus interes.t;
. including tiJee d D~i:s t ri c~t Tax and Fi re I?at xo1 Ta~x.
(Par~cel No. 35643-9017) °
Genezal taxes for the year 19,80 and .prior years delinquent in
Che amounts of $471.49: and S559.67, re,spective.ly, plus, intere:st•.;
including CJee-d Dis-tric.t Tax :and Fire Patr-o1 Tax.
(Parce.l 'No. 356:44-90:24)
2,. Asse;ss.ments for the year-, '1980 delinquen:t i-n the amount o-f $231.0.0
payable to Trentwood Irrigation Distzict Vo . 3, plus interes:~t,
pl-us Treasurer's F.ee.(Pa~rcel Ido. 35,643-907:7).
As ses sments for the year 1980 de linquent in :the amour.t of $21.7 . 00
payable to Treintwood Irri.gation Di-strict t1o. 3, pl-us inter.est,
Plus Treasurer`s Fee. (Parcel No. 35'644-9024) ( cont inue d)
0
~ . _ - c.. " e . ~ . - . r . , • . . ir. . . . .-.~^A 11+M+►~ - . . ~+~'1IiM~.lilii~'~ - A
. ,
- t . ,
- P:ag e 3
~ O.r;der No. 97855--M
TRIRD CF.RT.. T4 PI..AT
3. Liabilit..y Co future °asses.s.►nents by ~.'rentwo'od- Irri.gation Disrrict .
. Ro. 3.
4. Re-servat:ion of mineral rights hy Nortliern Pa,cific Rail~aay . in
. need., date.d SepCenber 1, 18'83 and reeor-dad O.c.Goher 20, 18$,6 as -
D,o.c ume n t No.94*6 , a s- f o 11'_ows.:
' Reservirig and exc,ep:tii~g fr.am said land"s sueh as are no:a, lcnown or
sl-iall herea_f ter be ascertaine;d to conta-in co,al ar iron, and
also .rl1e use o.f. suchsurface grouizd as. rnay v:e ne'ces_s:axy for
min-i-nz operations ; and th,e r.igllt -of acces,s to s-uch reserved. an`d
exc,epte'd coa-1 and `iroji lands for- t11e ;purpose of explbrin.g,
devel,oping arid work-ing the same.
S: Right to make necessary slop-cs for cuts or fills upon pr-op-erty
he-rein ;des:cribed, as g-ranted hy Deeci recaxded as Documeiir No..
432G23. . .
6. Ea:sement`s o:vez -and a~tros"s sa-id. praperry f.ar const~:ruc-ti.ttg
and. main taitiing , te lephvrie ~a~nd elec'tric pawer lines disclos.ed b.y
Document -No. 324569-. 7. EASEMENT AND Tl-lE TE'RMS AND CONDITI'ON'S THEREO.F: 'Grantee : TrEntwoo.d Irrigation-Di,s tr-ict i~o . 3.,
I'urpo:se : U,ndergr•ound pipel-in_e, o.f tlie d~i's-tricC for the . .
t'ransporta'ti.on anct d'elivery oL- wate'r,, o:f a-. siz:e
n,o.t tb .excee.d. 12 iincnes in diameter
Dia:t`ecl: J'anuary 12, 1966
IZecorded : .J,anuar17,, 19-66
Re,cording No~.: 1:71591_C _
GQt1TR:4CT OF SAI,E AND THE TERrTS AND CGCdDIT.IONS ' THEREOF : ~
S,ell_er: Old National Bank of Washington, a natiorial
b'anking- -assoc-iation., as Tr'ustee under ,a,gi_eement wit'l
FajT,q. S.: El.lior-t elated Sep.t.ember 2, 8..,., 1972,. anc~
Me:rcedes Jes.l~e, a n~ar~ried woci~n as, her, s;o.l.e, and
se,narate prop.cx Cv
Purclzas er : Th~e iJ, hain C.a,rpo.raL:ion , a Cdash_inZt,on. corp,oration,
as .to. :~aZl;unclividecl 50°!o int:eres_t, an,cl T . D .-C . , Ir►c .
. a Washington carpo.raCi.oii, as tb an unclivide"d 50°In I
interes t ~
Da ted : Apr'il 2;, 197-9: ~
Recor.ded: 4ril_ 6, 1979 Recvrd,ing..No. : 7„~-0-40'60363
Re.c.ords exam.i,necl to, July. 2,8, 19.50 4V 8-: 00. ~A. TRY'1N IC~1 IT L I=i~SUR.ANC.L C01!IP~1NY
n
y.
Chuck Boevi~ng .
c.C: IPEC ` _ _ ,r
A
i1 . . . , _ . _ . . . .
•7 ~r
.•1.~'f - ' . .
SPOKAIYTs CDUNTY. XTALTH DISTRIG ,
Inter-0ffice Commun:i, cation• y
Dite February :4, 1980
T0- SpokaAe Countv Plannirig Coumission • . _ _ _ _
~
FROti: -E ~ (enA)eQ"t~. SharA, 'R. S. • ` . . -
,,SUBJECT: ProDosed Preliminarv. Pl-at - Suamerfield ~ East , . . . . ,
_ r
1. References:
a. Our- memo to y.ou dated August 1, 1978, subject as,above.
b. Plat map, draft,.of f-inal plat,. Sunmerfield East, dated August,
1979, scale 1" =100', received by this office Januarq 29, 1980.
~
2. The f ollowing is add'ed to,be a part of paragtaph 4 of ref erence 1(a) abo.ve. '
"e. Pzior to sigciing of 'f inal plat, typical septic tank and drain-
field drawings (scale 1" = 20' ) be svbmitted for the -follrnaiag_ lots:
Lot. 1, Block .5; Lots 10, 12_9- 13, 22, and 23., Block 3; Lots 1, -2,. 4,9
8:, and 9, Block-6; Lots 1, 5, 79 8-, and 22, Block•:2; Lots.15, lb,
17., and 18:, some on 5, 69 7, and 8, and Lot 1, Block 1.
d lp
c :
E. 12720 Nora Avenue-
Spokane, WA 99216
. ~ .
~j. ~l t j ,
F~
~
SCXD-AD9.-318
0~~~~~~~rr - 'I'innsamQiicn' _ , .
I o~ 7111d In;curanco~Co~r T111G ,IflSUrBnC@ S@rViCc~,: A►orlh.720.Argonnp k,,.,d
S¢okeno, Wnsl;~ington'9920Q
(509) 922-2222
I ' " ° " 'A' ' - . . •
~ ~ ~ •
' ~ .
~
~ f s:E
e,OND
II'ICATE TO PLf1T
P spo! J 1-1180 ,
tqN~~~q~y~ c
~ ,O£p01,NTy Order No.: 97855-M
Rr~FN
~ Certificate for Filing Propo:sed
P-l a t o f SUMMERI' II;LD EAST ADD IT ION_
S'pokane County Planninb Comrnission
N. 721 Jefferson
Sp'oka:ne, tJashington
Gen t 1-emen : .
In the matter of the E.ldt sutimi:tt-ed for .your approval., tll:
1s Company
h-as examined the. records of the County Auditor and County C11erk o~f,
Spokane Coun ty.., t~'asr.,~.ngton,-and tl~e reco~rds ot the Clerlc of the
United Sta-t:es Court.s holding terms in said County, aiid from such
0.,xami-nazior hereby certifies that the title to th,e following. de,scribed
land s1tuate in Spokane Couiity, , to-wi t:
Aparce1. of lan-d in the South ,h,a.lf of- ,S:ec,tion 35, Tow►l'sh~ip' '26 N.or-th,
Range 4:4 E.M.M. , being more par.ticularly described as follows
Beginning at the South q.uarter corner of Section 35; thence South
$9 °,52' 00" Wes t alorig t-he So~uth line of the 'Southwes t quarter of,
said Seetion aild centerline 'of Welles ley Aveizue as it nowexis;t;s U.
feet in c~idreh a distance of 66,1.05 feet'; th.ei:zce No-rth 0.0005' 38" West,
a dis tance of 30 . 0'0 feet to the Plortherl.y ma~rgin of Welles ley Aven:ue anc3
True P.oint of I3egintriing oi'- t:his 'descrip-t`i'on;, th~ence North, 00°05'-3~8" Wes,t
along the Eas t b;ound:ary of- PL;AT NQ.:4 Or iJES',r FAMS IRRIGATED TRACTS,
as per pla:t the-reoF rec.o:rcled i-n V.olumo "0" o€ P'l-aGs, page Sl, adi-stan.ce
o,f 1121.63 fe-et; thence Narth 62-°23'41" East, a d~istance of 192.,9-7-
:Eeet ; thence -North 4:0 ° 31' S9" Eas t, a dis,tance of 48.01 feet ; thence
. Nor`th 6;5`056'49" East, adistance of 12$.00 feet; thence' South 46'013',.24"
Eas t, a dis,tance of 114.31 , fee.t ; thence Eas t~. dis tanc,e of 469. 10
feet ; th-ence North 79~~° 35' Sb:".- '~ast, a ctis tarice of 133 . 39 feet ; th.enc.e
South 56°039' 30" East, a ctistance o_f 63.63, Fe.et; thence North 74°28,106,"
East- , a distance of 128:.00 feet; thenc'e Sou-th 13;0-55' 30" E-ast, a di-stance
of75.1-9 feet; t-hence :South 89,056'40"' Ea:s~'t, a.distance of 36-.43 f'eet;
thence Sautil 00 °03".20" Wes t, a d-istance of 123 . 00 feet; thence South
36°-Q_2'_2'6" East„ a di-s-tance of 54.45 feet ; tl-►ence South 00°03':20" West,
a dis;tance of 12,3.00 feet; the:nce Sou.th 89056'40" East, a di_stance
of 375.09 feet;, then-ce South- 00°25' lg" We.s:t, a distance of 564..0 1 feet;
thence North 89 °'56:'.4Q" W-es t, a clzs tance of' 342 .-6 7 feet ; thence 'South
00043'10" West, a cii-stance of 1.33.00 feet; thence So.uth 06°'17'44"
Wes t, a dis tance of 44 . 26 ieet ; thence South 00 °,03"20" Wes t, a dis tance
~'!KTt~7TS~J'7i~.r~. . s7!_4.'~3?T~'-~,..~~-~-.-, ~~.,.--...ST~- - - .L~ra~~ . . . =~t'.:...~..~w'..uri.7.~+iYT.ii1.~'.:-y1►
- _ _ . , - - - - "
r .
.N.
E?age 1 nrder No. 9 7$5.5=M
of 143...00 FeEt t.o 1L-:i'G :dortherly mar:gin .of 4?ellesley Avenue, as
it nUw. exists' 60 feec i:n width; thence 'Ndrth 89°56'40" Wes-t along
~s-a`id Northerly .margin a distance of 274.'9:8 fcet; tllence Nor-th a
di.s tanee of 903.42 feet; thence Cdes t a distance uz 70'0 . 00 fee:t ;
thence Sou,t4 a ciis:t,ance cf 903.90 f.eeC to saidNortherly margin of
Wellesley Avenue; thence South 8.99,5:2100" tiJes':t alon:g said Nartherly
~ margin a dist-ance of 311.10. feet to the T--r.ue Poinr_ of Beginnirig
.of this descript'ion;
Situate in the Couxlty of SI,okane, S:t-ate of G1as;h~ngton .
VES.TED IN-: OLD UATZON,0.L IiANK OF WASHINGTON, a nationa1 b;anking
as:sociation; as' Trus C•ee uncler agrzemerit w,;i_ch I'aye S. Ell._io.tt
c1a.Ced .Se:p:temver 2.8,., 1972 an.d MERCEDLS JCS:KL, a mClrried woman,'as hcr
sole -and separ.ate property..
ExcEPTioNS:
1. General taxes fo..r the year 19.8.0 in the amo.unt o:f $5.03.02 including
Weed District" Tax, pay-ab.l-e February 15, 19.80 .Qarcei No.
35 6,43 - 9.011)
General taxes for P.ribr years -deling.uent in the amount o-f-
$59'16A6 including. Weed Dis:trict Tax, plus interest. ' (Parcel
No. 3564.3= 9017 )
General Gaxe:s f-or the y.ear 19.80 in t-he amount o:f $471.59, including.
taee.d ,Dis triet Tax, payable February 15, 19.80 .(Farcel T1o.
35644-_9.024) - -
General C axes for pri-or ye;ar:s d,eli:nque_nt in the amoun,t af
'S559 ..57 incl,rding tJeed Dis tr~i,c.t Tax, ;4;lus: iriteres~t .(Parcel
I~o. 3~,G44-902.4) 2. Assessments f.ox the yea-x 1.98,0. in the amount of $231A'0, Da.y.ablc
F'ebr,uar.y- 15, L980. to Tr'etitwood Irrigatian Di~strict Vo. 3.
(Rarc,e1_ No. 35643=-9.017) . Asses:sments .Eor prior year.s delinyuEn't in the amount of.: $198.00
plus iritzres:t, plus Treasurer' s Fee t,o Trentwood Zrriga tion
D'is trict No. 3'. (Parcel_ rdo. 35:643-9017)
Ass'e.ss'ments for tli e y.ea,r 19.80 in -the amount of $217 . 00, payab.le
:Fetiruary 15., 1980 . (Par.cel No. 35.644-9024) A_ssessnients for priox yea:rs delin-quent in the amount 'of ,$186.00
plus in,ter-e-st, plus `Treasurer's ree to Tr.entwood Ir.r:i.gat-ion
Distric-t No. .3. (1?arc,el No-. 35.644-902.4)
( c on t i nue.d-)
I • ,
1
~ w Fage 3
_O:rder No. 97855-M
, . - - _
3. Liatiili.ty t.o future- assess.ments b,y. irentwood Ir:rigation D.i~s-tric:t
i No. 3.
4. Reservation of mineral r1ghts by Northern P-acilic RailNJ,jay in
Deed da.t :ed Septemb~er 1, 18~83 and recarde-d Oc.tb.ber 20, 18;8-6. as.
' Docu:ment No. 94.6, as follows: Reservir~g anci, .excenting; f.r:om sa-id ].ands such as are now known or
s-11a11 hereafter !ve asci~rtai'ned, to c:on~tai-n c-oal or iron, and
also, the iis.e of such suzface- &o.und a-s m,3y be: nece-ss,ary f-or-
mi:ning oper,a:tions ; and the right of dcrcess to such r-.eserved and
excepted coa,l and ir-on lands for the pu'rpose of ~exploririg,
developing and working, the same..
5. Ri:ght to make ne,cessary slopes for cuts or fills upon pro_perty ~
h-erein ,described, as granted by Deed recorded as Document No.
432*6:2 3. -
6. 1?as,eme.n ts over aricl acros~"s s.aici prop'erty :L.or con.s tr-.ucti.n'g
and ,malntAininZ telepllone and. e1.e,etric power lines disc`los-ed by
Document No.. 324569.. - • 7. CASCMENT AND TkiE TEP,itiIS t1N'll COND.IT,_IONS TNLIZEOI'_:
G:ran,tee: Z'rent~.~.o.o:d Ir3zigacion D,is.tr.ict No. 3.
P_ur-pose : Undergroun.d pipe'l ine o.f- the ' dis.trict -for th;e
,transpo:r tat ian -and. de Z ivery o.F wa te.r , of a s,ize
no.t :t;o exceed .12 inches in diameter
D:a~Led_: ,IantLar,y. 12, 19"6:6
1Ree6rded .Tanuar-.y 1.7, 19'6'6
Recording No. : 171591C.
8. CONTRAC:~ ---OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND, CQNDITIONS THEREOF :
Seller: Old Nation.al "B-anlr,o.f Wash-ington, a -national
banki" a~s-so.ciation, as Trust'e"e under a°~greement ~~ith
Faye S. Elliot't dated September 2&, 193-2 , .and
Mexcedes ;leske, _a marr.ie-d woman as, her sole and
sep,arate property
Purchas er : The W. hain, Cor-gorat i.o:n , aWashing:ton cor-~pora~t ion.,
as -to an,urid~ivide~ci_ 50%, ittte~r-es t,. an~l T. D. C.. , Inc.
a Washington co_rnoration, as to an -undiuided 50°l0
-iiit erest
-D.d.Ze.d.: Ap ri 1 2, 1979
- Rec-orde.d : Ap.ril 61 19 7-9 Rec_ordiri.g. -No.. : 790 40.60363, . ~ IZecords examined t,o Jan:ua-ry. 3,9, 193.0 at `S;: d0 A.M.
TKANSA74ERICA TITI:.C. INS:URANG;E COrII'ANY
A
13Y. lf-C)
Pam Bah.r '
cc IPEC
TM%l
i
,
~
NEARING EXAt•1INER COMMITTEE PU6LIC NEARING
APPLICATION N0:_a- l"7vo' zz
(Check one)
I would like to be on record in
~ FAVOR
OPPOSITION
NEUTRAL
Do you wish to TESTIFY a t this Hearing?
C~ YES
No
YOUR NAME : 1- ~
(please print
i
Address : ZUL)
. / • i;4~.~1
r
s'
64
r .
ft .
♦
RECEIPT Date J~ ccju.,.Jj uti 10 19 74 3524
Received From
Ad d ress ~ IZ7-Z 0 r\Ut q e.,`,,, f
, ► -
V O ffQ r s $
~ -
For
ACCOUN7 HOW PAID U 9: .1i..-,NE CO:xNIY Fi.f',l:.VM4G L:'Yjuti2kl
Ah1T UF I CASH ~
ACCOUNT ~ r
AMT PAID I CHCCK
BAtANCE MONEY
i~ DUE I ~ ORDER By f 8K806 Redrf9rm /
~
~
w .
~
RrE-CEIVED iNIOV 2 9 1979
' -'y`~~y 'j:r -~,~~~;s;t' 1~~i `
' t~~ II v ; ' t • , ` i
'.:zt :PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET
II~ r.
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKANC COUf/TV COURT HOUSE
November 27, 1979 •
lAliliiam W. Main
East 12720 Nora
Spokane, WA 99216
RE: Extension of Time for PE-1206-78
Summerfieid East
Dear Mr. Main:
Our files indicate that the conditional approval on your preliminary plat,
known as Summerfield East, will expire on February 1, 1980. The
Hearing Examiner Committee must consider and approve, in a public
hearing, an application for an Extension of Time if your preliminary plat
is to remain active. The Committee may attach additional conditions to
the plat during the public hearing.
I n order to process an Extension of Time, we request that you complete
the attached form and return it no later than December 31, 1979. A fee
of $75.00, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, must accompany
your application to cover the cost of the public hearing.
If I can be of any help to you, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~
~
Wallis D. Hubbard
Subdivision Administrator
Enclosu re
WDH/Ijv
51)0KANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTPIENT
e&&4 ~~4eg~m VeW. X /
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
January 23, 1980
Wally Hubbard
Plat Administrator -
Spokane County Planning Commission
N721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Mr. Hubbard,
The following prelimi nar~~subdivisions for upgrading
have been reviewed fo ire protection:
, L/ PE-1206-78 Sunnnerfiefld East
ZE-202-78 W. Main Corp.
/
PE-1278-78 Trentwood Orchards Replat No. 1
ZE-204-78 Fogg ~
r ~
PE-1359-79 Pines fice `Pa~rk
ZE-254-79 P~erson~►y~
~ , r-----1
~I - • _
PE-1361-79 C e states
ZE-263-79 Bat~s
PS-1362-79 '~K•a~h~u~ a Hills ls Addition/'0`
ZS-262-79~ K-ahuna L ~nd Co. ~ ~ ~
_ .
PE 13/63 7Prosser tio
ZE-264-7Byers ~
~ ;00011
/
Main~s and hydrants ne-d to be i stalle id n the above
azr as . Acc'es s plans or f ire i:htin g e qui pment Around
th.e buildi/ng shal • e a• proved p ior to building p~ermit
is suance..:I
/ - ♦ - , --a "
-'~l Codk y
AC:sn R E C E V E
j A. N 2 19 ao
SPOKANE COUNTY
RTMENT
. PLANNING DEPA
~ PRE VENT FIRES SAVE LI VES ~
1•
.J '
AGENDA, January 29, 1980 TELEPHONE: 456-2205
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUBDIVISION HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
TIME: Tuesday, January 29, 1980 - 9:00 A.M. (Item #B on Morning Agenda)
PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, 2nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane
PRELIP1INARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME
PE-1206-78, SUMMERFIELO EAST
ZE-202-78, AGRICULTURAL TO R-I -
a. Location: Located in the Trentwood area of the Spokane
Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley
Avenue, west of Progress Road „ south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N, Range 44 E.W.M.
That portion of the N4J 1/4 of Section 35, in
the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying SEIy of Forker Road and
SWIy of the power line easement as recorded on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's
File No. 572309A; Also the E 1/2 of E 1/2 of SW 1/4 of said Section; And also i
that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said Section lying SWIy of said power ,
line easement; Except the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right-of-way;;
And Except commencing at the SW corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of said section;
th. E along the S line of said section, a distance of 350 ft; th. N a distance
of 933.42 ft; th. W a distance of 700 ft; th. S a distance of 933.42 ft. to the ~
south line of said Section 35; th. E along the S line of said section a distance ~
of 350 ft. to the point of beginning. And Except Wellesley Avenue; And Except I
that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within Plat #4, West Farms ~
Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51. ~
c. Sponsor: W. Main Corporation E 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99216
d. Engineer: Inland Pacific Engineering & Construction Corp.
E 12720 Nora Avenue
' Spokane, WA. 99216
e. Site Size: 91 acres
f. Number of Lots : 266
g. Proposed Land Use: Single family dwellings
h. Existing Zoning: Agricultural
i. Proposed Zoning: R-I "
j. Water Source: Trentwood Irrigation District #3
k. School District: East Valley #361
l. Method of Sewage Disposal: Individual septic tanks
M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether the Hearing Examiner Comnittee has
adequate informa tion to assess the adverse Environmental Impacts of the proposal.
The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-530 (2) provides that: ".....In
the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not
provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse
environmental impacts of the proposal, an EIS shall be prepared,"
n. The applicant is requesting an Extension of Time on approval until February 1, 1981
-2-
• - • • • ~ i
FqANG15 /►vE~~-_~ ••r -
~
: ~
mo(v
I r :
. L .
,
L„l'y4
. ` ~
~D
Lc) ~
aClr
~
- - ~ ' ~ ~ - - ,
Pv_ E~ 2 41 _ o. , Q
Q • ~
Ea s t
(MY Ea5t
C. .
1 W 1e Ya ilvy ~
v o► y 1
~ o J~"". Vy I ~ J r. H% 9h tl~qh sc~'°° ~
~U c-,Ch001 .
w T cnrwoo imx : wE-
~ W 0 Q ~ l W en,,. s~t,un► << ,L ,
,
72
I 4
d CL 140 u 14 3 F a ~
'_.r~'"r'` ~ ~ „"r►'~"'- ~ z6 + 4,'
~ H OY
11E , ~ l c
' w~,► ~w ~ a' ~~f ~ , ~ . ~ 2
~
~ ' . • ' , ` -
TL • ~ , t
= W v p Q,- 7
t ~'..u r, ~ ~ Q, M.,~•,~~' E~ L041 ~
E E' ,n • ~ • (Y ~ ~
•
. p 4
r i- L l - ~i ~ - n a ~ . .r ~
~ ~ • •
~ r N ~ , • '
d . '
do- _y---~" ~~y.~-- • ~ . _ : t~ ~
` Q J a ~T" , • ' \ .
j E l'J . • ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ _ - -
R ~ 2026
~ - - • ~ ; ` ~ _ ~ . -
••~•~t~ r ~1
.
r►~R1N,
re 1,, _ 1000
,
. ~
.
UMIJ ;
" L L
OL L1~~~
,
STAFF ANALYSIS - January 29, 1980
PE-1206-78, SUIrIlKERFIELD EAST
ZE-202-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECI.ASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME -
I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. History
i
The proposal was approved on January 30, 1979 by the Hearing Examiner ~
Committee. The proposal was planned to be developed in phases. To date, no ~
phases have been finalized. The first phase surveying draftiag have been
completed as have road sewer and water pZans. No physical construction has
begun as plans have not received final approval. The project sponsor
indicates that progress to date has been chiefly delaqed by the 208 study and
the need to develop new drainage plaas. Also, current economic considerations
have slowed finalization.
B. Location
The Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to and north of Wellesley
Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Barker Road and east of Bannen Road.
C. Proposal
- 91 acres subdivided into 268 lots for single family use '
- Lot froatage = 80'
- Lot sizes = 10,000 sq. ft.
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
A. Circulation
The County Road Engineer has not recommended any new conditions. Only those i
conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record. ~
~
B. Sewage Disposal
I
Temporary use of individual on-site systems is authorized uatil an area-wide I
sewerage system is available. Dry sewerage lines will be installed within the
plat. ~
i
i
C. Draina&e I
I
The County Utilities Engineer reports that the final construction plans plans must be reviewed and approved prior to the filing of the final plat. '
D. Water Supply
The proposal is located within the recorded service area of Trentwood
Irrigation District #3.
- 2B -
. r
STAFF ANALYSZS - January 2! .980 'iERFIELD EAST - continued
E. Fire Protection
The proposal is situated within the recorded service area of Fire District #1.
F. Schools
The proposal lies within the boundaries of East Valley School District #361.
III. CONDITIONS:
If approval is granted, the following conditions are recommended.
ow Those conditions already attached to the preliminary plat of record.
~ That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to
review any preliminary plat approval. All extensions applied for may subject
the project sponsor to new conditions required by Reviewing Agencies.
,
. That a time extension be granted to February 1, 1981.
Y
! 2C _
•t7`.`' _ + .
` R ` ~~5~~~1'P1ARY PLAT
} i • _ _
EXTENS~ON OP T-TME F'QRM
Summerfi el d East W ~
3 r h - - _
'n~L ' • -
r 5' Y' M1'~ L y 91
Ii3 ~~5~ ~~fb, ~ D' t S : ~ NuF{2 ber Of AC T @ S :
t~~oP, ~~r,7 A wn, er,} ° - - ; Spopsor and
, iib d
-9 po~r1ts~~r~: ~,Tbe W. 1,4a.1.n Cor.gorat.ion ~F,r~o~e_r#y Owner; T•U.C•, Inc
4 Y •
7
E. 1271TyAora Averiue 'L ° k 4 d d.re~ss . E. 12929 Sprague, Av,enue
,r ~~t v i 7•-•' ~3~ ~ .l .r ~ _ ~ L l . - . . ,
t W-W s _
4K-s-~ata, zi p: Spokane, WA 992,16 ~c~ty, ~state, z~p. Spokane, WA 99216
w
x ' ~r
4
` }y~ T
928-7346 _ Pr x onl~e ~T o . ~ $
. ,
F Y r}T'~5y - F - l A _
Engzneerls~ive,gor: Tnl-~n,d P~cific Engineering and
~ .
'L~otz~y~s•v r~u-cT~~.on uorparatxon
A
. z
~ - • ~ - ~ "t~ ~ • Address . ~ . 1IN~.' _ $129 40 -Nora, Avenue •
. ? ,
~ls~:
cityf stater zip. $.pokane, WA, 99216
ax, 5
k ; . .
, r Pho77 e No: ' - . . . .
a_~' a~', r ~~l' a!' aF 31' 3l' # .~i' # ~k ~k aF ~F ~k it xr af~ ak ~k ~ ~t st SF ~ ~ ~ ~F ~ ~F ~ ~r r} ~fr ~F ~t ~F
L
~ . . P HA,.PR
~ - - . - • - •t.
.f • x~
~ ~8~ 'rOMPL~"i'~ED O2~~rY I~" TH~"i PL1'~ T I+-_,`~` B21~+~D~i V~.' ~+OP1T'~rD s~ND i~' INa~LI~r~' D *
-i N ~
• AS E S OR .3 TAGES) ~
rak' • r ~l'
Num b er of 2ots oxiginally ~apprbved; 266
11~0 m be r af pha s es f ina 3.ized Ec~ ~a te~: ~NOne
Ivwh.be r of lats finalized to -datt'~2 : ~ NDne ~
x r
~ 266
'
~b~ ~I Fi! Of lotS 3^ eIF1 t3 3 2Z ~3 I7 g t ,O F~"~~~ ~ 3 r~I' o ~ 1 2` ~ C~s :
~ - , ~
,IU Lrrrib,e .r, o f aer~a,s rerrr ai n i n g: ~'`91
,
; ex~t~_~ o,f p,r~op~ef~`tyr ~~r~rr~a~lhlr?g to be deve.~crped and finalized
;
(P , e a .s-La b_e s.u-r,e tha t t he 3 eg-a 1 p.t io n e x cl,ud e s ~ ~ l
phas e s th at *
e-n fina,z i zed) ;6,8r Z ega1 descr i ption in ` -
, - - - Pre1 itn1 Clir~ ry p lot 11J5," . . .
~ + - + R
i~ 7~' 9k 7~ 7~ 7~" 7f * 7k 7f 7~' 7~' 7f 7~ iF ]f 34' ]t 7{" ~ 7f Sf * 7~" 74' 7~ 3~ 3~ 7~' ~.7E' 7p 3E
. f~
- L
4
qj~pated da•te for finali~'~.ng prelirr~inary ~alat. PbaSe 1, 5pri[~g ~98Q
r
} r
} } ~
[
^
- 0 Vi+R
~ - -
[ fF ~
y } l
. • ..w ...~~Sri _ c- . ~'Z.. l .
F - --T - - ~
' • ~
~
Briefly summarize the progress, made to date, in preparing the plat
to be finalized (i.e. physical construction, bonding for improvenients,
surveying and drafting work, a,ccomplishing various departmenta3 re- .
quirements, obtaining or granting easements, etc.)
Survey ing and,d'raf t ing work; on tbe, f irst phase of the pro ject ,
SVMKERFIELD~ E,A'ST ADDITION, ba,s been com,pl,eted, as have road',, ;,wuwer
- - - - - -k - - - - - - -
. an,d wa,te~r pla, ns. The fina-I p-lat has 'no4t y-et been filed,, no pby'~sical
consftzuction,-, has begun; plans have not 'received f inal appz~oval , and
, - - _ _ - - . - - - - - - _
~~~io im,pr-ovements have been bond'ed'.
Briefly state the reasons the plat ha~s ,not been fina3ized and/oi,r w.hy 'tihe
pZat wi11 require an Extension of ,Time (i.e. current or past, probliems,
delays or setbac,ks that may ha,ve slowed progress, economic considerations,
difficult_y meeting department.al requirement.s, etc.) :
Fi`ling of the first pha,se, SUMERFIELD EAST ADDITION, has been
d'elayed, chiefly by the noed to devel,op new types of dirainage plans _
to solve the problems which were outlin,ed in the 208 Study of the
aguifer.• The plat is als4 designed as a phased project, to be
. f inalized ovrer the couxse of severa.l ylears, as economic considera-
tiions allow.
;
- ~
Y
J
S i g n e d. e
L , - . -
Sponsor/Owner/Engineer/Surve yo,r
..~r
Date. l / _ _ ~ 1~7-9 i
~
- 2 -
- . . y. . a . ~ ..r... - ` • - ,i'i r<: '
/
OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Date f~NuA/L 19 $o
Inter-office Communication
To SgQkane County Planning Deoa~rtment
from County Engineer's Department
Subject SuV"merL'ic-ld E ASf
The above referenced plat has been scheduled for an "Extension of Time Hearing" on
z~~ 2 9 , 19~_. The County Eagineer's Depar[snent has reviewed
the plat and finda that the "Conditione for Approval" which were required by the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner and/or the Board of County Commisalonere are still applicable and
$hould be required ea a condition in granting the extension of tiane.
~
- _ .
(
' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 .)EFFERSON S7REET
f~ ~ p~ _ •
PHONE 456-2205
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260
SPOKqNE COUNTY COURT MOUSC
November 27, "1979
William W. Main
East 12720 Nora
Spokane, WA 99216
R E: Extension of Time for PE-1206-78
Summerfield East
Dear Mr. Main :
Our files indicate that the conditional approval ori your preliminary plat,
known as Summerfield East, will expire on February 1, 1980. The
Hearing Examiner Committee must consider and approve, in a public
hearing, an application for an Extension of Time if your preliminary plat
is to remain active. The Committee may attach additional conditions to
the plat during the public hearing.
In order to process an Extension of Time, we request that you complete
the attached form and return it no later than December 31, 1979. A fee
of $75.00, payable to the Spokane County Treasurer, must accompany
your application to cover the cost of the public hearing.
If I can be of any help to you, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
. - ~I t - . ~ r.
Wallis D. Hubbard
Subdivision Administrator
Enclosure
WDH/I jv
. . , ,
wwP~3115 REV. 8•73
' ~.~~-,2:'::_-~``3=°.•~~_:~~;1Y✓__::4a , . - . ~ ' . ~ . .
~a:T~^'~- . . 'v7~!`_. ''4iv . , ' . . . . . V • ' =-VE 4 yF'z: ~ - . - , _ " ~ ~ , , o ' ' ~
THE.-WASHINGTON -WATER POWER COMPANY
~ .
E,lectri c and Natu~ral Gas SerLice
r ~ r- , • ' ' . P.O.`BOX.3727• $POKANE, WASHING'TON,99220o(509) 489•0500 •
August 3, 19-79
11r . Eric W. Calkins.
. ; Inland*Pacif ic Engineering S ~ . ~ . ~ ~ . . . . . ~ .
Construction Gorporatiora . ~ . . . ~ . .
' East 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane,~ Waahington99216 ~ ~ : ~ • • . - . . .
, , , . . . .
. , . . , .
. ' Re: Summerfield East Addition ~ ~ . , • v
~ Dear Mr.-, Calkina: -
~ In response to your recent request, our engineerd have atisdied aubject ~
plat and, have aecertained 'that the utility :stripe showa in the proposed
dedication will be eufficient to 'accommodate -our Company's utility facilities-. .
~ , ' ~ q ~ .Vesq trulq yours, ° . .
Richard,Muffett ~
Rights of Way*.Supervieor
CC: Spokane ~County Planning Pamission,✓ ' ~ . ~ , . .
. ~ , , . . . .
' . ' . J . . . ` . ~ . C . . ~ , . . • -
~ . , . , . • ♦ - . ~ ' ~ t , ~
. . . - : ~ . ~ . ~ . ~ . -C ElV ~E
AU G 6 1979 ~
. . . . ; , . . SPOKaNE~ COUNTY .
PLANNING DEPARTMENT . .
, . . . _ .
. . . . , ; ~ , . .
. . . , ~ - , . . . : , . . ~ . : ~
'
5' E R. V 1 N G T H E ~ I N l A N 0 - E M P I R E • 0 F W A S H I N G T 0 N A N D ~ 1~ 0 A, H 0
r .
~y
PaC1f1c NoP"thwE:st BeII
July 30, 1979
Spolsane Couni,y Plans'ling Gouunission
N 721 Jefferson S i,.
Spokane, Wa. 99260 RE: Swnmer.C:ield East- Adda.tion
lle-ar Sir:
The utility easemcnts provici%-Id wa.t-hzn the FJ.a, of SummerField Las i: Ad-
tfi 'ion are sa i.isfactor;~ zo Paci ftc Norihwest; Bell.
"Flemi-ng
G . 13/W Agent
N 904 Co-].uanbus
SpUlrane, Wa. 99202
E C E I
E
nt U G 3 1079
spom-tibic. VoUN! N
PtaK,`<<'N, J i PARTMEN1I
TransamenoA Transamerica
Title Insurance Comr'^'
~ Title Insurance Servic North 720 Argonne F
Spokane, Washington 99206
(509) 922-2222
►
E G V E
Lif CERTIFICATE TO PLAT
~U 1- 2 ~ 1979
SPOKANE COUNTY Order No.: 97855-M
PLANNING DEPARTNiEPJT
Certificate for Filing Proposed
Plat of SUMMERFIELD EAST ADDITION
Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, `,Tashington
Gentlemen:
In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company
has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of
Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the
United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such
examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described
land situate in Spokane County, to-wit:
A parcel of land in the South half of Section 35, Township 26 North,
Range 44 E.W.M., being more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the South quarter corner of Section 35; thence South
89°52'00" West along the South line of the Southwest quarter of
said Section and centerline of Wellesley Avenue as it now exists 60
feet in width a distance of 661.05 feet; thence North 00°05'38" West,
a distance of 30.00 feet to the Plortherly margin of Wellesley Avenue and
True Point of Beginning of this description; thence North 00°OS'38" tiJest
along the East boundary of PLAT N0. 4 OF UEST FARMS IRRIGATED TR.ACTS,
as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 51, a distance
of 1121.63 feet; thence North 62°23'41" East, a distance of 192.97
feet; thence North 40°31'S9" East, a distance of 48.01 feet; thence
North 65°56'49" East, a distance of 128.00 feet; thence South 46°13'24"
East, a distance of 114.31 feet; thence East a distance of 469.10
feet; thence North 79°35'S6" East, a distance of 133.39 feet; thence
South 56°39'30" East, a distance of 63.63 feet; ohence~~North 74°28'06"
Eas t, a dis tance of 128 . 00 f eet ; thence South 13 55 30 Eas t, a dis tance
of 75.19 f eet ; ther.ce South 89 ° Sb ' 40" Eas t, a dis tance of 36 . 43 f eet ;
thence South 00°03'20" IJest, a distance of 123.00 feet; thence South
36°02'26" East, a distance of 54.45 feet; thence South 00°03'20" tiJest,
a distance of 123.00 feet; thence South 89°56'40" East, a distance
of 375.09 feet; thence South 00°25'19" West, a distance of 560.01 feet;
thence North 89°56'40" West, a distance of 342.67 feet; thence South
00°03'20" West, a distance of 133.00 feet; thence South 06°17'44"
taest, a distance of 44.26 feet; thence South 00°03'20" West, a distance
( cc,ntinued)
Page 2
Order No. 97855-M
of 143.00 feet to the Northerly margin of 4Jellesley Avenue, as
it now exists 60 feet in width; thence North 89°56'40" West along
said Northerly margin a distance of 274.98 feet; thence North a
distance of 903.42 feet; thence IJest a distance of 700.00 feet;
thence South a distance of 903.90 feet to said Northerly margin of
Wellesley Avenue; thence South 89°52'00" West along said Northerly
margin a distance of 311.10 feet to the True Point of Beginning
of this description;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of 14ashington.
VESTED IN: OLD NATIONAL BANK OF 14ASHINGTON, a national banking
association, as Trustee under agreement with Faye S. Elliott
dated September 28, 1972 and MERCEDES JESKE, a married woman, as her
sole and separate property.
EXCEPTIONS:
l. General taxes forthe year 1979 delinquent in the amount of
$596.97 including Gdeed District Tax, plus interest. (Parcel
No. 35643-9017) Covering this and other property.
General taxes for the year 1979 delinquent in the amount of
$559.67 including Weed District Tax, plus interest. (Parcel
No. 35644-9024) Covering this and other property.
2. Assessments for the year 1979 delinquent in the amount of $198.00
to Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3, plus interest, plus
Treasurer's fee for delinquent assessments.(Parcel No. 35643-9017)
Assessments for the year 1979 delinquent in the amount of $186.00
to Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3, plus interest, plus
Treasurer's fee for delinquent assessments. (Parcel No. 35644-9024)
3. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District
No. 3.
4. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in
Deed dated September l, 1883 and recorded October 20, 1886 as
Document No. 946, as follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known or
shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and
also the use of such surface ground as may be necessary for
mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and
excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring,
developing and working the same.
(continued)
r •
Page 3
Order No. 97855-M
5. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property
herein described, as granted by Deed recorded as Document No.
432623.
6. Easernents over and across said property for constructing
and maintaining telephone and electric power lines disclosed by
Docurnent No. 324569.
7. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantee: Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3.
Purpose: Underground pipeline of the district for the
transportation and delivery of water, of a size
not to exceed 12 inches in diameter
Dated: JantLary 12, 1966
Recorded: ,7anuary 17, 1966
Recording No.: 171591C
8. CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Seller: Old National Bank of Washington, a national
banking association, as Trustee under agreement with
Faye S. E? liott dated September 28, 1972, and
Mercedes Jeske, a married woman as her sole and
separate property
Purchaser: The W. 14ain Corporation, a Washington corporation,
as to an undivided 50% interest, and T. D. C., Inc.
a Washington corporation, as to an undivided 50%
interest
Dated: April 2, 1979
Recorded: April 6, 1979
Recording No.: 7904060363
Records examined to July 20, 1979 at 8:00 A.M.
TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
By:
Pam Bahr
cc: IPEC
nv
~ w
i
~ ~ i."``` ~ ♦ ' ~ ► ~ ~ " O i
-~ttt<< ' t r .r
ir tL"=J11tj I Z F~l~ , '~~r
t ~
t ! ~ ~c.
~ i ~r [ ~ T` ~ ~rt~~ t ~ t t~
` J l ~ 1 ~t~ f { ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ i ~ • . ~„t ~ k t~ At ~K; • t;~it
~IL . ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ t~ r ~l ~ '
Il - t i + r ~ ' , ~ ~
itit'~ t~~
t
~ t~
r.
tQth
.
f a ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ 1~ t ~ • ~
~ ~f ~ ~ ~1~~ 1 g ~ ~ r ~ ~
lic
t ~ 8" ~ Z r ~~r;~•
~ ► • ~1 ~ ~ ~ i~~~g,~„j ~ , .
~ ~~~■t~. E(~$~ r# t ~ t~t:t~~t
~•.;i w ~ p f ~~S'~:~~,~ ~ ~ ~ {~i~ ~ ` ~ ~ • ~'4~`~f
~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ -
~ :r r ► ( ~ . ~ h,
•t~
t't41 ~ . '
~ ~ ~ k 1 ~ ~ ~l ~ • 4 i . , ~ L ~ t 1 , • t , • ~ ~
IL~ ~
r~t ! ~ t ~ - ,L
it R i ~~r ~ ~
t Irt" t~A t lE ~ • a ;h
` , ► ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~(~'~~if1 j~) ~ ~
• t t~, ~ ~ , ~t l ••t• !
r ~ , ~ k ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ ! f < 1 4
; ~ ~F ~ . , ; ~ r~• t~~ ~t ~ ^ ~~:g,
r 1 rt~l ~ ~ f ~ , ~~l r a1 t~ q
• ~ ~A ar1 ~t ~ r ~ ~~~~i 1~ ~ I~~~r
,tt t ~ ' ` ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ r t,<`~,~:_
~ t
,
j
t ~};~r
,
i L
IL ► i ~ o~
- 4E e ~t ~ r + e - ~
• ~ ~ ~ . g ~ ~ "
► ~ a s ~ ~ t ~ * ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,,L ~
I
~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ td_~ t S ~ 1
I ~ ~ •
~ s t ` ; ~ ~ ~ ` $~~y~' ~r'• I!1
IL~~ , ~ ~ ` ~a~'t ~ti•: ',~.~'t.
~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ t
- t ~ ~ ~ ~
+ p r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ S ~ ~ ~I- I 1 ~ ♦ , F
8~ ~ t~~t ^ ~ E • ~ - ~ :'p~
rtl~ ~ .
9~
1 ~ ~ t ~ • , ► ~ ~ 1 t ~ ~ , • ~ i
~ c fj f ~ • ! ~ ~ ~ ,
~,ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ [ ~ - ~ t•~? ~
<
j ` , ~ r ` ~ , ~ ~ _ ~ • ~
~ , ~ ~ , r r ~ # ~ t - ~ ~ • ~ 4~
` ~v ~ t ~ ~ i S L r FP
♦
t .L t v
4
~tt~ . R~
. ~ j t ~
~ , .
, ~
.
.:g
c
w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ r
• Y
•
j M
~s~ pp8~8;~ ~ a°' • ~ ~.~~5~ o. ~eo~ ! ~$~~a~ •
v
a~ '
40
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 SQ ~ ~ V ~ p ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ • ~ P ~ • f p • ~ O
j~~~~"•e'$~~, MQ"7. C~0~{E..
~p~ a AA 7v~~.~ F~ ve►~ ~y~ti~o ~ g~~ ~..R
• ~n Io-iotaill 9 .
Y~ i ~w p~~~~~8 • 8, K~ cA ~ ~ 0 D~ : 4 Q @ ! p3 ~T.' I( ~ q d
1r .fG i D~V w1..vi O~ Y ~sy
~ M Y ~ o ~ • I O • ~ . b -1 o$r O O O 1 4 3 O p G ~ ~ i ~ M • p
S y;jI ° M ~i 1~•~ O t~ao•v ~g
4LJ
P~ ~~~~,~b:no ~ a ~y ,a `•~:~3~ ~e ~35
7 ~ aM ~e .s~: ~1~ ~ Q - Nu
Ii ~ ~ 1~ c e ~ p •
22
M ~ M w o
~ ~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ M a ~ tl ~ ~ ~ a6 ~ • ~ ~ ~ M ~ `
w w~'i,~ ~~A r o ..a,6~ Z a4o~ ~ q J't S
M • e
✓aq ~ ~
oa ` nr ■ O.~ J p O
.t ~ • 7 r
h C G
' ~yr~~e~ Ai 16 M
al~.ot
~ r a ►s x o~
03~~a..
aL F°~o~ ' " ~ ~=1~ .B
~A iC{ ~~eatia...,~g~ "t~ o , ,s ~ A~M
M p:~ 6 O ~ I~T rl M L l~ p~, r1 A~~ C C r] ~ B'~ 1~ ~ M
-::~kBE ; s ~,P~.~ . ~~r p ~
~~~a.~~•; . , a~ ...,At~ ~ a ^ b
~~r v ..iF •~u~~ C q Ge • t••iM Y 4 ~ ~ `3' e s~~~
~~a~r~l7~~~•:~~q~r ~ ~z +~Ma~v w~ ~ i s~a.~~~~~py ~ ~~~t ~ya ~ a
00Aa`oW(i~t.~
•~M ~
-0 ~ jM ~ ~t~ ~F~M ~ OJ a a ~d~~ O O.r~Y • O ~
• ~ ~.+h ♦
L 7~ ~ Q ~11
• ►.p 7 L1 v ~ ~ tl~ ~ ~01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~Ili • ~ • M A~ ~
0
ALe~~~ ~'~eE~i~~~~•ok ..~3~ o}w1 ti~e ~ ~So~+~ ° ~ ~ ~1
• .~i O ~ ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J 7 M C Y ~ r 0
~ • s~ ~~g~•~=p~' •
d8
~ ~ .
, ~ . . _ _ . _ . - _ _ _ . _ _ _ • • . ~
~
• • • Y ~
Q ~ v ~ ~ ~ e • • ~ _
~ j~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ a j w ~ ~ w .0 ~
K'~•8~ ~ ~rd~•C~Iy+Y~ ; ~R yQsR I; `Aa a ~ o
~ e~ • ~ • 4 ~04^~y Qw ~ • h I ~ ~
~ ~M~~ ~ 10i ~ ~ A y~ •~~P ~e p ~ ~•1~ Ar ~
~ 1~ M • ~~I O ~ R • ~ ~ M i ~ :7 ~ M ~ ~ ~ ti ~1 yM ~ . ~ • • ~
214~~; ye~~..~sa~-~~•~°:~~ s D~~~,: ;Al
b ~ •~`i ~r~ a ~ ~ .
t a.~ , . t Q~ . rIb-A.. e a~s.. 1 ga t
%•aa a. . ~
dn ~ ~
a v~ ~••r v ~ °v♦~.. ~ •
s
~ 11
w ~~.i~.~ir qs^~~ ~ fi~e pO~y Y~.~~ ~ ~Q ~ O Op •o OQ y w
A ~ • O j • ~ r Y ~
1~,~ A ~ i w ~ ~ ~ ✓ w ~ ~ ' • I N R~ ~ ~+F ~ R I Z ~ R ~ J ~.a+ r r • Ci ~
: ~IOt ~ ~a ~d~$s ~~-n~ -2•
: ~Q ~a
~ ~1.^J ~ 1 MtlI .r ^MIl'2 HO • _ • ~ t• ! •
a~~-~.s ~ ~i s•M I I a~. A i ~s--.~~.p
i d d 31
. ~ M . t .
~ ~ ga olj 29 ~ ~=2$10 6 .~r,eb
CP,
.
1" •
, • .1 ~ t 7 : C h .~..w -.oo .S 11w~ g~~w
~31: ~ ~ ~~•"~~9~4~~~~ 8 : ~ t I ~ :1 : ~~•:aa~~o~ r«
i ~~~~4~ ~•F • O ~ M7 ~ UY ~ tMr
wod~a. •~iol aI ; .~oe • ••r~'Zib~•~ ~ '~.`.~oa. . ~8
' ~ •~~r~~~~2?~~~ ~S~A~.~lQ ~ s~~~...+ ~•s ry~~,~;,~~
, • w AM~~ . • w r v••r • r•
~e •o o~~ ~ ..f~~~•~~r :~.+Ar •~M ~i.~N~ / ~•~^'~••~~.(i~8 ~~:i ~ Y
~ brs~ ~ A~ 8~~~Y+~•~ w~ 1.~~ 1~4.• ~ /~i Fr~r~0•O~• i
• • w • • • w A J M~.. ~ • ~ ~ ~ r ~ r • ~ ~ ~ w • P ~ ~ tl • ~ ~
P*dS11~~ !3~1 ~°~Aa. o.:0 a~~ •~ty ~~.e: a~.~ti ~ ~~~"~o•;%~'a~ ~S
ar ye R P. i ~~~--+rN ~,~wa.a r
2 •g.t8~q ogo~ I o~.~.,oR ~y8•='~•_
v
O 9La M`~ 1
b:gl5~. Gw~~o•N„..l9~;°~~~t~ p..!.►~aq~►~ ~ w 'oo ~sM..5
~ ~ S • ~ ~ .i 4 C : ~ • ~ ~ R ii~ -i~i ~ ^ ~ ~ . I 1
•II~'%
t•~ Za ~~~~~M~~1~:rt. f ♦ J i
op
_ A os ti~~ o a~v ..r~ *;..~,e er)
~ .~r~,~~~~ ~~~•-•!~~•L~~-g~a g~ l~E r~u..g~{
I a~~ I~:~~~~~~:a~~~s
~ v~~ d~b'~ V8
a ~ i~ 4f~"E~1~~~~~ 9~ ` !
~ • ~ ~:~~y :...o::~s~~a ..ae ~°a"8~~- ?..~~~~~~:~:~w•ji''S s~ ~
GOV
~ ~ ~ ~ ~vp~ ~ ~aw aoA~R•~.'.~~'a'r~eSe~.. ~ °°~tl8.ya ~•r~li~ ~~i.'
O ~f ~ ~ '~Q ~ f~~ Q ~ 0~ A•~~ •OI~~ 11J§ c~ ~q~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
ot
• ~-1 M 4 ► • d ✓ ~ • ~ 1
• ~ a . a . ti.... z,. a .
M~~~B 8 .`y~•~ ~
11
x
► e.. . ' ~ i ~ ~B a~~~ss~~a~ ~~g:~~d ~~~y~ - ~..~3~~,s=•~=v~~~~
:
I ~ .a~1 ~ r` o a a. a a
t~
va-.~:. 1.~
. ~
.Y , . . ~ . , ~ ~ _ • 1715~ ~ c
Y' ~ - • ~
. : 'r91G
' X E+.~ ` ~y 6I1;%E',S the hanu anu seal of the urccrsi¢ncu rantar, c,i,
'a~ ~ ; ' • ' k~SEalw~T OEF.D j.".•y r9t**,
'
.r
. anJ tn cnii ation of the ber~efits to bc ceri~~e~ b% thc ;:.i,i:,~r fio.r, saiC
~
' jli1.°.l11tC, Chr US1c:11Cd. 4iALrL2 A. A\Q_,R.SN, a sin: lC r.,;.9. ocs ~ vrCJ) ;fd^i j11L.
tonvey unto iT,f;oT a,,R MtCATlO`. uISiRICT W. 5, An inrir-attn. ,,istriet ) tl,: ctatu Crl
of nashington, 1LS SUC[BSS01'S 8nG aSS1oPVS, b jCI1Ctlt11"f'1.`.L-Q:-tiJ% 2.1d C15e'CRC DIl
tlte follouinj; dvscriLLd lanu situa:c,{ in Spcl..me Co:i :,~tc o~ , i%hin;ton, to
: construct, reconsttvct, onerate an1 meintatn a 1.~ ,~ipe,ine ar,d a,),~urtenances, as ~
r'1 hereinnEtor provi,!eJ, tn-wit: ss,
A stri,r, nf laud~ boing tliat rortion of 9GV^.I}. U,1 ACf! 'jl,lU,~X, s platteJ , l,✓~ , c • area in the Soutn Isalf of ~ection .iS,lovnship .t, \oTth, r~nncc 44 BCCORIIR" to the plat thereof recardeJ in the offacc o: the Snnlane f.ountv 1, Oc
4utntcr, l%inc on cit'ter si,le of the centcr linr a- her,:faaftcr de<crzbed y~pWaay, do Aerebv eureify 't at on this /24 day of 6soeorbor, W6f,441"Y ana incluJed betaeea cwo lincs parallel tu tlte t-enter line, soic parallcl personally aFneareJ before ne 'tiAL7ER A. ANDERS(W, a sinple man, to me known to
• lines eacl+ lyinv, ten feet distust metsured at riQht anqles to the iollowinR be the indniclual describev in ;.nd xho executeJ the within instMncnt, onci
Jescribed center li1e; DeQinninF at the south quarter corner or Section 35, eckno-Aledged that he siened and sailed the sanc es hts free ard volunta:y act and ueeu, `
TownsAll- 2t, \orth, 5in,;e ad thence Couth S9° Sil-i/?' !-cst 661.05 .`eet, for the uses and purproses Lhemin r~entioncd,
cherce Nurc'i 0'10•1121 hest 1760.S Feet, chence north F,s: 15 ioet
to s Fozat +liich is true roin: of Ceqinnin:7, thence conur.uin^ \ortn S9°SQ-U2' GIVIrE under nv ltand antl officirl senl the Jay aaJ e, t 3L e rrzcten.
!.ast 645.1 `ect, rore or less, to e noint or the nori -saEt'. crnter linc o` 51id
Section 3.1; thence '-ojch 59°50-1/11 e.asc 1.!7.4 fcet, nore or Iess, to a;^aint
on the wcsi rirhc-oc-v-y line of Progress 'toarl. /
l _ .
A SA1tI StTq` n' 11ftd the ~;filI1tCC t~15LTICC. 1L5 Sl{CCf5ti0r$ 1fl(~ 3551vi1Sti~l~ ~l?l!,'~ ~O~uT~ ~II~i1C
the Ferpetuai rit,n: 3nd privileoe of coristnsct2-^, reconstructii-, o.c:nt1n-1, *e,)air.r,, ,7 aiw.;
'IRO natntairir~~ ;i! S~cCT,^?Ml11iI •ii,elme ef C ISLr1Ci. L:'~111~~OT~:L.IOf
r \`I ~
_d@L1LG'}' 0: ~^S."", Of - CI:C fl0L e\Cf8d1'1;, 1',C'7C5 1C ~j;i_^CtC'.
- _ . _ . ' - - ~ „i• ~ v^' , -
in the eNer:i,e o- tt:r cis^vent tne ~rrn.ee «ttrict sha?. co, _i r°c t3 crn,5
`ences to t,e e\tent -casen:bly tvysible in,: s~i~ll nav r~a-ona9:t- ~ltt: fa^ cro,;s
8CLLL111) t1C<tTOvCl' Of ;y 8, ee 111 L''C faC: c1SC 4. LIl1$ FaS( i1;iJ to; CeS IC'CVC(i
0: dL'13^PJ Sf-111 FC :CI'LaCCil, P' L'IC p.1Ltll'S .°C Lltab12 LU d"C:C .,S L7 L}1t ;+R-0..'1L
0f &4"3',CC tD ll' I z:1t_ LtIC 587,C ShJ11 bl' 'CSO1LCt 1)} 1"51LI'oL10,^ kfi^,:'l~` C: c'1 pStt,,, t
4
naaes ore : r'~i.;r, ttcs: tio srhitcrs nn•c a t' _rJ lrtitc^ ; n, the tiuer arbitcrs thus ~
ndaeJ shall reach a cletemlnation by majorit~ vote, ►hicl. :,oi1 Letcrrination sa;.tl bc ~
es.cevted b? t'.e ;,a:ties. '
The rro%isic.,s vC thze tnstr~ment shatl ic bir,,.,i apor, an%. lcss^_c or :ena.It oC the
~
prenises oi 1..101 the strir of initc he.eir uescnl,ci zs •ar.. 11,c pa,,-acnt o+. ~
crop daasa,cs h) the erentec [o thc tenar,t or lc.scc shall .onst.w.c ,,c-fomantc o'
tne nrantee's u!•li;ntion to pay crop aa u^es },c:cunJcr, aru t-c L:itiisior, ui s113
Pymcnt ior crop J,n:or.,cs shal l he a mattar to i)c handleA Ucticcn tiie pr3ntor as
lnndloru anJ lus tenznc ur lessee.
1n the makin- of anv excavstion in the exercise of tlits case-,ent the ;;ran,ee dtstrie:
shall restorc the surlace o.` ct:c ground to t,.e curtuition tt nes ?i irior to the
exrAvation, a: ncall% cs rcasonal;lv r0551U1t,
1 udersic,neJ erin:or avrees to tonstruct no werrnnent n,lrmui enta, eat-ept Cences I
on satd strii a' Ivid ~crcin t,escribed,
SuL}ect onlr to the urvnt herein madc, the pO55CSStot1 and usc of saiu strio of land shell remain in thc prantor. Ais hoirs, logel rcpresentativas and assigrs.
The un+!rtsi•acl t,•rr01kts ;Ii-it lie is the oerer v` tlc ;prcnist.s or 0.1cit C,e_ strip o:
IajiJ herein describc,' is srirt, and th,i; hc i~ -utLurize%i to execute ttis instcwacnt.
Ttu rirhL-of-wav and oaseiacnt hercin conveyed shall be binuin", upon and inurc to the
benafit of the liartics hcreto, their heirs, successors, le;nl rc;rescntativas znd :
aasigns. ,
l( Gr,.. Tr. wl
s~ ~ t ~',.d~►s.a~ o
~ Tci~l~6...~► ~.~~.`~U -
-
~j~" L
~ . . .
- ,
>f .
•,~i ~ .K A/w~ Jt E ROOA IAf -A6t ~/OA r~~~fIf
\t~
~ ~v s
1RaN",
y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3G
~
h.
. ,~0,,,~ s /I ~ 2~• ~ • ~g ~ a /a• ' Tdb•f
,
~ ~ ~ ~j, ,~/zQD,Z a► ~a~ ,y ; ►
. E ~ I , l . ~ ~ ? ~ ~t~ R '
0 IG, c1\ ~12`.l~ , -
~lhlls Gf,P. ~ • y^.~C !iC
~ ~
~
~y
lI2hl!Ili N
` IOCBLIOf', 2~1: o ~ ~ o + 1• r
~
A ,
piD
y~20
4Z
~ S~ °j~,~~ `c0 . ~ `Is
; 40
; ~ . ' ° ~ ~ ~C ~ \ Z . ~ 3i1 ~1
~o n~
~
'7/2 3
~ • Z~ ~ ~
, e~/ sa
~ W
a
i ~ V ~ ~ ~ >'i~ • ISt.bl'
• ► /l. yz~~~ ~
~
..Se9'0~'S^°.i' .
s, ~ ' •
t ^
i
PEC
~ NLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
February 20, 1979 '
Spokane County Planning Department
Public Works Building
North 811 Jefferson Street
Spokane, tiJashington 99201
Attn : Mr. tiaally Hubbard
Dear Sir :
Enclosed please find a copy of "Affidavit of
Publication" for your files concerning Summer-
field East.
Sincerely yours,
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Mrs. Helen Poulsen
Secretary
Enc 1.
R ECEIVED
y= -LE3 2 491 1979
SPOKANE COUNPI
ptANNlNG DEPARTMENT
\ EAST 12720 NORA AVE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99216 9 (509) 922-1300 /
\
= A,
1
~
1~►C:~~ ~ M - , ~ KI.1!
~ ~ ,Y
j I
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROAOWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON S7REE7 -
PHO~vE 456-2205
~ Grllill ~~'r~,;~~ ~'y~
~y~ ' ~ ✓ , " SPOKAPlE, WASHINGTON 99260
• tlJ`'.: y- - 1_~', a- v`=.
SPOKpNE CoUNTY CaURT HaUSE D e c em b e r 1, 1980
Eric Calkins
I.P.E.C.
E 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99216
RE: PE-1206-78, Summerfield East
Dear Eric:
Please find enclosed:
1) Dedicatory language for fee in lieu of for Parks and Schools.
2) Copies of correspondence from School District #361
concerni ng wal ktivays . fdei ther di sposi ti on of the wal kways
nor the District's request for fencing are addressed in the
Spokane County Nearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order,
January 30, 1979. The Planning Department's only concern is
that maintenance responsibility of the three walkways be
assigned and accepted prior to finalization of the plat.
3) Bonding forms to be completed in order to comply with intent
of Condition #42 of Findings and Order, January 30, 1979.
Please call if any questions arise.
Very truly yours,
"a 9 oomwr
Mark Jaffray
Enclosures
M J /dj
1
-
y.C~.~~I,`
' PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~ ` , ~u .✓~`~1 ~
gROApwAY CENTRE 9UILDIPlG N 721 JEFFERSON S7REET
' e LJ 1:~~ S•{ ^ r f~~3 '~~e l~ y
}L'i' PHONE 456-2205
;
. _.~•1,_,, -~"s~'~r~~ SPOKANE, Wa5r+iNGToN 99260
~ i
SPOKANC COUNTY GOUR7 HOVSC
, Proposal Name: Summerfield East
File Ro: PE-1206-78
Dear Si r:
One of the requi renients set forth by thc SpoE:ane County P1 anni ng
Conimission in connection with the above proposal involves the
f7 1 i ng wi th thi s o1=f i ce of a Fenci ng 6ond. A
prel imi nary i nspecti on of the proposal has been macle by -thi s
office and the amount of the Fencing Bond found to be
as follows:
$
~
~
Aillount of F e n c i ng t3ond $ 4,343
A F e n c i ng 13ond i n the above ainount iilust be fi 1ed k-1i th
this office prior to approval of the final proposal. The bond
wi1 1 be rel eased on1y upon sati sfactory compl etion of the requi red
iniprOVE?111eI1f:. Pl ease con t;act thi s off7ce when vrork on the improve-
nlent is rea dy for i ns pec ti on , or if you des ire acidi tional i n-
formati on or acivice concerni ng t;lie improvenient
. l ~ .
Di rec tor
'~~~U •
Prepared Qy:
UST ~ ~GL~Y SCHOOL DISTRICT
361 ED JENKINS, Superintendent L. DEAN L UECK, Assistant Superintendent
Telephone 924-1830 '
Administration Office - N. 3415 Pines Road
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206
BOARO OF OIREGTOPS
A WESIEY SEIQFMAN ,
R08ERT P IRONS
QONALQ KRUEGER
PHILiR FQOTE
DOUPLAS ~AMSAFiTM
September 12, 1980 , Plat Administrator ,
Spo~:ar~e CoU~~i.y rlan~i-liig i.omfiii ss i on
Spokane County Courthouse
Spokane, WA.
Gentlemen:
East Valley School District No. 361 will accept the parcels of walkways in
Summerfield East. '
West Side of Project - 10' x 134.36'
East Side of Project - 10' x 133.>00'
, North Si de of Project - 10' x 128.00'
Summerfield East has promised to put chain link fence around the three sides
of our property. The Board of Directo~s of East Ualley School District seeing
that this will be done, would accept the walkways as shown above.
Thank you, EAST VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT N0. 361
~ .
Sanfo d H. Riiggs
Business Manager
SHR/sm
cc: IPEC
C E~r~
F
r'Ep
lo.`OKANE COu-,. °
PLANNING DEPARTMEIVT
~ .
& TOM.BARI
xf.' Fi hF F~~r r^' ,Iti'!' ,..f1W
617 P?1U1..SEN R?',;,f3I."d[,
SPOFfANF. 'WA-SJ'IJI+dC7'1'C)IV 0920I •
,IANlE:ri A 1-'ISH
STAxi_i~Y R. sCiautirTZ
wi Li..IaM A. TOM BARi. J 11. May S, 1979 11~1.1;:PIAONH: 509 166-0890
' Mr. Dary 1 Wa l1er
'East Valley Schotal Distx'ict
Noe 361
N. 3 415 Pines Road
Spo]cane,WA 99206
.
Dear Mr,, Wa1 ler : This letter wi.ll clarify my letter of January 9r 1979
and confirm vur telephone cvnversations over the past few
rnonths e
,
As stated in my letter of J'an.uary 9, 1979, the under-
signed represents Wi ll.iam Main investment Cvrnpany and x-n D, C Q'.
Tnc4,joint venturer5# in the Summerfield East residential
subdivision project o
In rny letter of January 9, 1979, we offered 'two alter-
natives to fulfi ll our ob1 iga tions under the State Platting
z,awr Ghagter 58.17 R.C.W. for provision of a schQOl sitee
The first alternative was to provide 1and within the boundaries
of the subdivision« The di,strictrejected our offer to prvvide
iand wi thin the boundaries of the -subclivi sa.on and therefore
the da.,stra.ct and the deve lapers agxeed to pay a fee in 1ieu
of such adeda.cationa The ~Iistrict arxd the deuelopers agreed
an an initial fee of $168.00 per xot .for 268 lots based an
the fol lowing consider. ationse
y n ziew - te.-mer.t-.ary .~-_~~?rDr fox the J'"Lstrict wi1.1 accorrt-
moda te 500 s tuden ts ; .
2. The xninimum site size for such a school a.s five acres
pl~~ an additivnal one acre fo,r each 100 students Qr ten acres
for a :500 student capacity ejernentary school:
3. The East Valley School. Distra.ct has typica3ly purW
chased an average of twelve arres for an elernentary school
site; .
4. In s.xx years Sumrner-F'ietd East will hause 268 elementary
schoal students ar 53.6* of t,he apacity of a 500 student capa-
city e1,ementary schaolr
5. Lan.d cost for a sc-hooi s ite is estimated to be approxi-
amately $7,000.00 per acre or $84.040e00 for-a twelve acre site ;
wi
l
.l~r. Daryl I►Jallex
May. 8, 1~9 7 9
Fage Two
6,. Siummerfield Easti s shari~ c►f the coSt of the sehool
site is. egual to 53. "6% of $64, OpO. 00 nor $45,024. OQ, or .$,168. 00
.pe+r lot for 268 lotS.
The 9unnmexf.ield :Bast Plat was apgz.aved Fox 266 lats b.ut
the :$].6 8.. Q 4 peX Zot fee does not ehange. In,other words,
the reduction, in the amoun't' of, lots fram 268 to 266 pE~sul;ts
in a small xeduction in the percentaqe a-ttr.ibutable to Sumnnex---
field Bast and the $16.8. QO per lot fee '-remains constaAt-.
Zt is undexstood and agr-eed, there-fare, t-hat the East
oalley SChoQl nis:tric~t No. 361, wfLI'l be pwLd $1-68.00 per lot
in the Summex.fle1d Eas't proje.cfi.. St is furthe:r, understood
and agreed that the $16.&.~Q0 fEe is subject to a 9% per aranum
inCZease each y.eaY on the ariniversar-y of trhe final plat agpraval
of Summerfield'East.
iln _cQnclusiTon, we expect the'ftos to be ga-id as paxt of
the b.u,i 1c1ing permit applica-tLon provess at the County and
alt-hough fina1 document's have ~nn't been executed with rega~d
to the collection of the fee and distrila.uti.on to you;, z ex--
pect to complete those negotiations wlth -the County, brior to
the f~.na1 plat ap,proval of -S,ummer-fie;ld East:
I't has been aur: p7:easure to work `va.th Xou on this, novel
approach to promiding-for sehvo:l sit-es based on the ne8ds
speeifically attributabZ.e to ouz gr:o..je-ct,. We thank youlfor
,your coopera'tion in thi smatter s Yf 'you , have any ques tiOns
°please d,irect them t'o the underslgn:ed at y,,,our e-arl.ies:t eoz~~
'Venience.
Very truly yours,,
FISH, sCHvLT7 &-ToMsARi
StaRJ:ey R. Schul'tz
S,RS : bn
V , • ' ~ .h.
li
r '
l~'iSl1, (.;c~1-1ui.-rr & T~~~~ARi
~ A•rrORNicv~ n•r I.Aw
cit 7 r".iati -SKv 11uit.11iNu
- SPOKatvE. W:»rriNuTuN 91,_01
lil' R. ,r'M111:17
..•4i.1,inrI A.•~OrttOAKl..1,t~c. J8C1LlaY'y 1~'7~? ;r$'J_ViIs It iNi: r~c,:, i~- ►►s+0
Mr. Sarn A, -ie-ove 4S'4-4730
Spakane Caunty Farks &
Recrea tion
W. 1115 Broadway
~pokane, WA 99201
Dear Mr. Angove:
3'his letter will confirm our conversatifln oi` .7anuary 26,
1979 regarding dedication oi' a park site .for thA Suminerfield
]C,ast Subdivision.
We have offered two alternatives to t'ulfill our obli,(-,ra-
tions under the State Platting Law, Chapter 58.17 R.C.W.
for provi.sion of a park site. The first alternative was to
pr.ovide land wittiin the boundaries of the subdivisiort. You
have indicated that y-our departmerlt is not inter-,,st in In-
quiring and ma.intaining apark within the suhd-ivision.
The aecond alternative is for us to pay a'fee in lieu
of such dedication. We agrpe to pay $58.00 per lot upon
closing of each lot as such a fee. The amou.nt of a proper
fee is very difficult to estimate, but t~~e figure of $5$.00
is our best effort to appartion the demands placed upon
county parks between the future residents of aur siibdivisxon
and athers within a two mile radius park service area.
It is understoocl that the $58.00 Pee is aubject to a
per annum increase each year on t,he anniversary of the
final plat approval. It is further understood that the
$58,40 fee was calculated based upon 266 lots, and that our
agr~ement to pay this $5$.00 fee is speeifically conditianed
upotl approval of 266 lots for the subdivision.
The undersigned is specifically authorized to rnake this
of#'er as attorney for T.D. C., Inc. and William Main Inv~ ;tmA nt
Company, joint venturer-s, in the Summerfield East Project.
Please advise if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
Staril,ey R. uOc hult
;J,K S : bI 1
cc: T.D.'C., Inc.
Willlam Main
. A OR
R ECEIVED
-
NOTICE OF ACTIbN BY THE `tB 15 1979
SPOKANE COUNTY NEARING EXAMINER COr1r1ISMNE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW, NOTICE IS NEREBY GIVEN THA1'
THE SPOKANE COUNTYHEARING EXAr9INER COMMITTEbIp ON January 30, 1979
TAKE TNE ACTION DESCRI6E0 BELOW.
ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDEo ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTNERWISE CHALLENGE Sl1CN aCTION ON
THE GROUNOS OF NQN-COMPIIANCE WITN THE PROVISIONS-OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW.
(STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED ON 3 16 ~ 79
(30 days from date of 2nd newspaper
publ ication)
OR 6E BARREO.
TNE ACTION ?AKEN BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEFNOTICE OF
WHICN IS NERE6Y GIVEN WAS AS FOLLOWS:
20NE RECLASSIF~CATION . & pRCLIMINARY PLAT APPROVAL,
• (1) APPROVED ACTION: PE-1206-78, SUMI`1ERFIELD EAST
(2) OESCRIPTION: Subdivision of 91 acres into 268 lots for
single family dwel.lings. (Partion oC N6J Sec.35,T..26 N.,
R. 44 E.W.M.)
(3) SUCH ACTION PERTAINED TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS AND/OR
DESCRIBED AS (street adress or general location); Located in
the Trentwood area of the Spokane Valley adjacent to '
and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road,
south of Forker Road and east of Bannen Road.
(.4) PERTINENT DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING NORMAL COUNTY 6USINESS
N. 721 •
NOURS AT THE SPOKAyE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, NMA JEFFERSON
STREEY, SPOKANE, WASNINGTON, 99260 PNONE: (.509) 456-2214
NOTICE GIVEN BY: INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTIOv CORP.
FILEO BY: NAME: Paul F. Jenser~ TITLE: Agent
, Z
S TGNATURE ~ ~ r.~ J C~~' ~ •
b
I-
~ o
AFFI~-AVlT OF FOSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTOTd ~
) ss
COUIVTY OF SPOKkVE )
PAUL F. JENSEN , being first duly
6wvrn on oatn, deposes and says; '
That I am a citizen o* the "Jnited States of America, and a
resicient of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years.
,
That on the 13th day ot February , 1979
I personally posted one (1) or raore true and correct copies of the hereto
attached ana incorPorated herein by NeferenCp N0TICE OF ACTIDN in a
conspicuous manner on the prcpe-rty, or as directed by trle Planning Depa.rtment,
which -..s tfte subject oi the AC'LIOiV, to-will, the f.ollocair.g iocaLions:
1. Telephone pole - Junior High School property on Progress Road
2. Telephone pole - SW Corner Wellesley and Progress
3. Telephone pole - SE Corner Wellesley and Adams
1,
-r ~ .
Dp~~D t-nis 13th day oI February , 19 79 ,
~
StTBSCRIBED and StrIORTd to before me tris 14th day of
February , 19 79
Q
Notarv Public in ard for tne Statz of
Washington, residir_g at Spokz=e
Y ~
qFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
6TATE OF WAbH1NGTON, ~ u.
NoYIca of AcTIoN sr COU1`TY OF BPOKANE, ~
T11E SPOKANE COUNTr MBARIMO
~ EXAMINER COMMITTEE JGi~ L VL~H ~TL
ourwenr ro me vroW~ss oe cn+pIK t.Y........._ , bein~ firat dnly aworn
47 41G RCW, nolice IS herft~yQ -vrn Maf
fne SpaKanc Ca+nty Hlsrln0 Exeminer
GOmmitleedkd on Je~unry ]R, 1979 take
n,~.cr~ eesctinea oo~ow. on or~th deposea and sa~s that he ia the........ ~-VOR....
M eL1bn fv S!t aside. Mioln. revlew - I
' a or~,crw+se cneu.nsa wcn eclion un of the 8POKANE YALLEY HERALD, a weeklv nettitipaper. That said nrn~
rne qrovnds d ror% compliartcr w;th IAe
vorisionso+cnepte►aJ.41C RCW (5tare naper ib u legal neK-suaPer anc3 it iv aca« r.nd hae been for more thnn six
Envirp+menial POt+c~ Acr) snbu ae months prior to the dat.e of t}ie publication hereinafter referrec3 to. publishe~l
~~mc.e pn Mnrc 1e. Inv or oe in thp English lanauage continuallv as aweek13 newtpaper in Spokane County.
The ncr;«, tikM ev n►: svaune
~l'ashin~,*ton, and it is no~v xnd durin~t all of said time wus Printed in an office
COUn1y Mcrrlnq Ex~miner tommiHee.
rortke o+ wnki+ is Rereov S1ivM, was as mnintAined at Lhe aforesaid place of publicution of said newapaper, which
pproved Acflon PE 1206-74. said newepaPer has been approved ne a legal newspaper bv order of the 8u-
ow 1~ A-
Summer!ietO Eest_ Yone recisssiticmt«+ perior Court of the St+►Le of Washington in sad for 8poicano (`ountv. That the
u+d preiiminarv Gls► avFvival.
(2) Dtsa~ption: Su tw~ 01 91
KTes Inlo 2e/ lots fvT sinyl* fM++ilr
awetlin~s (vor+w~,a Nw, se~. ]s T annezed iR a true copy of s._.
26 N.. aI E V►' M.T
fll Wch OctIan p41PrlliflIN0 ro prOpII"Y
commonly 4nown st andOr descrf0e0
as. Locstee+n the Trentwoo0 area d ene
.
Spakant vaIlaY sajrcrnl fo sno nortn ot
wenesitr Avenue. wes+ a P*vvm+s sa it was Dubliahed in reQular iseues (and nat in supplement form), of said
Reap, soum ot co►ka Aosd and eu/ of
Bsnnm RoaC
(t) Pertinent dotumrnta mey be •
exsminrtl durin0 normol countY neivspaper once each week for 8pef10f1 Of ................tiia COII89CUtivr•
business hov.s at Inf Spokane CounW
plannGnG deWtmenl. N721 JNidrson
st.eor. si~~ a5er,ne. 227•. w.sr+irwion. wteo
P1+a+e iSOr weeks, commencing on the~__..21h.- --.day of ...FebX1aIw.
Notice civm ey• intuia Paunc
Er►qtneerlnD and Coror►uctlon CorP-
Fifed 9Y: Paul F Jensen. Apen1
19._~. 1
214 and sndinR oa the 1-4th ..---.dsy of. ~0b&vUp,,wy.
both datee inclusive. ancl t.hat euc:h nen•speper was refLulurly distributud
its suh5rrii,3L'. 1 uf peri
8ubecri eworn to before me t.hia__ .-14th dey
..~`.e :Ty. ~8. .
~
`'otan- !'ublic in nnd forrthe Slate uf W ingtan,
Kesiding at: 5pokane, « A
-d
STATE OF WASHINGTON ~
D ~ ~ I COMMI3810NER
rr BERT L. COLE
R. A. 8E8WiCK
BUPERVISOR
Box 190
Colville, Wa 99114
Nov 7, 1978
tlt Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 721 Jefferson '
Broadway Centre Building
Spokane, Wa 99 260
Attn: Fred Deyharsh
NARBOR
AREA
RE: Environmental Impact Statement of Summerfield East.
Dear Mr. Deyharsh:
l I have reviewed the draft Environmental Irnpact Statement for the
above mentioned subdivision and feel that the Department of Natural
Resources has no questions or comments on any part of this development,
as it does not lie in our fire protection area or adjacent to any
lands managed by the Department of Natural Resources.
If I can be of further a9sistance please contact me.
Sincerely
BERT L. COLE
Commissioner of Public Lands
Walt Wruble
Spokane Local Manager
Northeast Area
WW:bl
cc: Philip Hildebrand, Area Manager
Bill Boyes, Operations Forester
Ross Hesseltine, Arcadia District Manager
~
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
rr-
SMOOL DISTRICT hu, 361
UST VA~EY
DARROLL A. W ALLER, SuperiMendeMr
R ECEIVED TRENTWOOD EIEMENTARY SCHOOL
VIROIL IUDEN, IMncipol
TeIispfione WA 6-0770
D E C 20 Cj IE 14701 W*Il*sley-Spokone, Wosh 99216
SPOKANE CflUNTY December 12, 1978
PLANNlNG DEPARTMENl'
Mr. John Sweitzer
Inland Pacific Engineering & Construction Corp.
E. 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, 1rJashington 99216
Dear Mr. Sweitzer:
Re: Proposed Summerfield East development
For the safety and welfare of the children of the Trentwood
Elementary School, both during and after construction of homes in
the proposed Summerfield East plat, the following proposal is
submitted:
That the developers install a permanent 8 foot high cyclone
type fence on the back of all lots bordering the playground
of the Trentwood Elementary School.
That only three (3) walk-through lockable gates be installed;
one each on the north, east, and west side of the playground.
That the fence be installed prior to the start of home
construction.
That all expense for the installation of the fence be born
by the plat developers.
Respectfully submitted,
Mr. Virgil Luden, Principal
Trentwood Elementary Schoo.l
cc: Spokane County Planning Commission
N. 721 Jefferson
91EARrM ~ANff~Igt CM2aTT~'...~ PUBLIC AMARMTG
r- Apolioation No
Applicant .
I would like to be on record in (Check one).
f I r AVOR
~ QPPOSZTIMT
Do you wish to TESZ'g'Y at this Hearing?
(Check one)
`'+~~+'S
r10
Name' (Please Print)
.
Address $4
F".r.AR~T~TG :-:XA:MT:.~ COMITTE.,.
PUBLIC EMARItJG I
Application No.lo~ 0 6
Applicant
I would like to be on recard in (Check one).
4~ FAVOR
OPPOSITIm
NE=AL
,
Do you wish to TESTIF'I at this 3earing?
(Check one)
Y:-: S
~ I T10
Name '(Please Print)
Addre s s S 4D/~ T
HEARIZ`TG EXANCMM CM?ITT~..
FUBLIC EMARr1G
Applicatifln No. C~ (~9
~
A,pplicant .
I would like to be on record in (Check one).
~ FAVOR
OPPOSI'rICN
C r r~:a~
Do pou wish to TE3Z'g'Y at this $earing?
(Check one)
~ YES
1`70
~
Name-(Please Print) CJt~f
Address
r'.:.ARyTG EXALC"M CCT24L=
PUHLIC EMAR12IG
Applicat+on No. Appi icant 4 t A:'
I woi:].d 1-4'_:e to be or. recozd in (Check one
~ rAvOR
~ r OPPOSITICQd
~ r ~J~AL
Do fou -•r:sh to T"E~"~'''~`r zt ts Hearing?
`c~ -rs
'NQ
;
~T1ClL (D? e89@ Jc-/
~
Address 61,7
~
_ F".r..AR~tG MCLIMM COMZ=
P'U5L.IC IEARLSG
Application '_Jo . ~
Appl-4cant
I•~rould li'se to be on recorci i.n (Check one
C ~ FA',roR
OPPOSICN
Do you wr_sh to TES!'_^-Tf at th..Ls 3ea:~:.ng?
~ `_'::S
,
Name (-D_ease Pr=nt)
d
AddrA s s
~
l
- Ar-.4RING ~WI~t COD2lI=-
FUBLIC BEARING Aprolication No. Zo 7 S
gPPlicant MAiri
I would like to be on record in (Check one).
FAVOR f ~ OPPOSIT'ICQv
~ NIE:UT'RAL
Do you wish to TES=T at this HeEring?
( Che ck one )
YZ"J
/ l rTo
,
r -
Name ' ( Please Print ) .~,,u c:
Addre s s UZZ tJ A\l c.._
MAPM1G EXAMM COT-Ml= _
PU3LSC HEARI.VG
Application '.Jo. /aa f-~7
Applicant /~-,I,~/-'
would ? 4-':e to be on recor3 =n (Chec'_t one ) .
FAVOR
OPPOSITIaN
NE*.JMAL
Do J ou -Jsh to TEat this 3earing?
,
. vt-* :aae (P? -zse ?riat)
Ad3ress ~ 3 c&S
4;j- ~f 2~s
~cr
0
SITE - 266 lots
- 10,000 to 11,000 sq, ft. lots
. 1. PACE ADDI TION (Ag. Sub. Zon ing)
- 20 lots
- 14,500 sq. ft. lots
2. CURRY ONE (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 22 lots
- 12,500 to 15,600 sq. ft. lots
3. SWAN ACRES (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 4 lots
- Acre Tracts
4. REPLAT OF SWAN ACRES (S ingle Fami ly Res. Zoning)
- 7 lots
- 20,000 sq. ft. lots
5. SWAN ACRES FIRST ADDITION
- 8 lots
- 20,000 sq. ft. lots
6. WELLESLEY MANOR FOUR AND THIRD ADDITIONS (Single Family
Res. 7.on ing)
- 63 lots
- 121000 sQ. ft. lots
7. SUNNYVALE ADD ITION (S ing le Fami ly Res. Zon ing)
- 41 lots
- 12,500 sq. ft. lots
8. PEP LINSKI'S FIRST ADDITION (Single Family Res. Zoning)
- 37 lots
• - 12,500 sq. ft. lots
9. tidELLESLEY MANOR FIRST ADDITION (Proposed Single Family
Res. Zon ing - No t Fina li zed )
- 53 lots
- 12,600 sq. ft. to 18,000 sq. ft. lots
10. WELLESLEY MANOR SECOND A.DDITION (Two Family Res. Zoning)
- 24 lots R-2 Zoned
- 12,500 to 15,000 sq. ft. lots
11. WELLESLEY MANOR ADDITION (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 49 lots
- 12,500 to 15,000 sq. ft. lots
x_
12. KRUEGER'S THIRD ADDITION (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
,t0 33,000 sq. ft. lots
c 11., 2PO90
13. KRUEGE.R'S SECOND ADDITION (Ag. Sub. and Single
Fami ly Zon ing)
- 12 =1=ot-s ~
- 11,000 to' 20,000 sq. ft. lors
14. KRUEGER'S FIRST ADDITION (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 9 lots
- 15,000 sq. ft. lots
15. KRUEGFR'S ADDITION (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 76 lots
-a) tiJas or iginally approved for 76 lots
in 1955, with the average lot size
of 10,000 sq. ft.; and consisted of
all property within all KRUEGER
ADDITIONS.
b) The Fina J. P 1 a t, however, wa s f i led
for 12 lots with an average size of
19,175 sq. ft.
16. BART14OL,4MEW SUI3DIVISION (Single Family Res. Zoning)
- 13 lots
- 13,000 sq. ft. lots
17. KING SUBDIVISION (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
(Repeat of Blocks 1& 2 of Trentwood 4xchards)
. r.
2 9F]. o t s~
- 11,000 sq. )ift. lots
18. THROOP FZTZPATRICK' S SUBDIVISION (Ag. Zoning)
~8=2 1s
C~i 500 sq fr . ]_ots
19 . VAL.LEY HOMES SUBD I VI SION (Ag. Zon ing)
~
- 48 lots--
- 7,500 to 1,000 sq. ft. lots
~ ~ - -z - -
- 2 -
SITE - 266 lots
- 10,000 to 11,000 sq. ft. lots
l. PACE ADDITION (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 20 lots
- 14,500 sq. ft. lots
2. CURRY ONE (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 22 lots
- 12,500 to 15,600 sq. ft. lots
3. SWAN ACRES (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 4 lots
- Acre Tracts
4. REP LAT OF SWAN ACRES (S ingle Fami ly Res. Zon ing)
- 7 lots
- 20 , 000 sq. f t. lo ts
5. SWAN ACRES FIRST ADDITION
- 8 lots
- 20,000 sq. ft. lots
6. WELLESLEY MANOR FOUR AND THIRD ADDITIONS (Single Family
Res. 2oning)
- 63 lots
- 12,000 sq. ft. lots
7. SUNNYVALE ADD I TI ON (S ing le Fami ly Res. Zon ing)
- 41 lots
- 12,500 sq. ft. lots
8. PEP LINSKI'S FIRST ADDITION (Single Family Res. Zoning)
- 37 lots
- 12,500 sq. ft. lots
9. WELLESLEY MANOR FIRST ADDITION (Proposed Single Family
Res. Zon ing - No t Fina li zed )
- 53 lots
- 12,600 sq. ft. to 18,000 sq. ft. lots
10. WELLESLEY MANOR SECOND ADDITION (Two Family Res. Zoning)
- 24 lots R-2 Zoned
- 12,500 to 15,000 sq. ft. lots
11. WELLESLFY NIANOR ADDITION (Ag. Sub. Zon ing)
- 49 lots
- 12,500 to 15,000 sq. ft. lots
10
12. KRUEGER' S TH IRD ADD ITION (Ag. Sub. Zon ing)
- 20 lots
- 11,000 to 33,000 sq. ft. lots
13. KRUEGER'S SECOND ADDITION (Ag. Sub. and Single
Family Zoning)
- 12 lots
- 11,000 to 20,000 sq. ft. lots
14. KRUEGER'S FIRST ADDITION (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
- 9 lots
- 15,000 sq. ft. lots
15. KRUEGER' S ADD ITION (Ag. Sub. Zon ing)
- 76 lots
- a) Was originally approveci tor 76 lots
in 1955, with the average lot size
of 10,000 sq. ft.; and cor.sisted of
all property within a]_1 KRUEGER
ADDITIONS.
b) The Final Plat, however, was filed
for 12 lots with an average size of
19,175 sq. ft.
16. BARTHOLOr1EW SUBDIVISION (Single Family Res. Zoni.ng)
- 13 lots
- 13,000 sq. ft. lots
17. KING SUBDIVISION (Ag. Sub. Zoning)
(Repeat of Blocks 1& 2 of Trentwood Orchards)
- 29 lots
- 11,000 sq. ft. lots
18. THROOP FITZPATRICK'S SUL'DIVISION (Ag. Zoning)
- 82 lots
- 7,500 sq. ft. lots
19. VALLEY HOMES SUPDIVISION (Ag. Zoning)
- 48 lots
- 7,500 to 11,000 sq. ft. lots
- 2 -
_ _ * _ _ ' _ • . _ ► ' _F ~ .
SPOKANE COUNTY - - ~
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
N 721 JEFFERSON ~ ~ a.,~"~•~ : ~~~/~J.<
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 JAN13'79 ,9- c~• b o~~
~ k~ ~
~
~ 1 .
~
Orvin L. Davis ~
v
E ~+9 Glass 2 ~
Spokane, Wa. 99207 P SpO~ ~~~3
_ . . 114/N AyF CO
N E, O ~FPq ~N1Y
}sEa
; +nru 23 v I~FNI
~u, F1RWs3R0
E , SENOER cS~ k' M ti
- ►
r
SPOKANE COUNTY ° - F -
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~c~` t~ - j
N. 721 J EFFERSON
' SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 JAN18'79 s~ y
I. e 15 ~
~ ~ •
a
£ s
Pb.~aid74 l~ ~.....,~w
a
W. D. Krueger
E 12817 Walton
Spokane, WA. 99216
"t'.r1GV ~ L R A BLE E • ~L
► ~ C =SSED
.inN 19 -9
CATZAG- 0 fORWARD ~ 1973 ~
REi~: 0 S E N D E R M
1\
i ~
~
AGENDA, JANUARY 30, 1979
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER TELEPHONE; 456,•2205
Time: Tuesday, January 30, 1979, 8;30 A.I1,
Place: Broadway Centre Building, %nd Floor
N 721 Jefferson, Spokane -
3:30 A.M. i'age
A. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIOIJS - EXTENSIONS OF TI11E
1. PN-1056C-76,PEONE PINES ESTATES 2ND ADDITION
ZN-135A-76, Agricultural to $ingle--Fdmily ReSidential
SCHONER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
2. PN-1157-77, PERRY ROAD ESTATES
ZN-195-77, Unclassified to Agricultural
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
RIDER . . . . . .
.
3. PS-750D-70, SOUTH RIDGE FOREST 4TH ADDITION
(No zone change requested)
GUTHR I E , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. PE-1162A-77, MOAB MEADOWS 3RD qDDITION
ZE-204-77, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban
` McKINLEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS & ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
5. °S-1257-78, MEENACH-CARPENTER ADDITION
ZS-194-78, Agricultural Suburban to Agricultural Suburban or Single-
Family Residential and Two-Family Residential
MEENACH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . t . . ;
6. PE-1206-78, SUMMERFIELD EAST
ZE-202-78, Agricultural to Single-Family Residential
MAIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . 6
7. PE-1249-78, GREENHOUSE ADDITION
ZE-190-78, Agricultural to Agricultural and Agricultural Suburban
GUTHR I E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J
12:00 Noon Lunch (Place to be announced at Hearing)
1:30 P.M. Reconvene
i,. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS
l. PE-1250-78, WAGGONER 1ST ADDITION
ZE-214-78, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban & Single-Family
• Residential
WAGGONER. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
(OVER)
1:30 P.M. (Continued) Page
2. PE-1161A-78, SUNSET MEADOWS - CHANGE OF COPJDITION
ZE-121-78, Agricultural to Single-Family Residential
SWANSON % HOMESTEAD CONSTRUCTION. . . . . . . . . 9
3, pE-1264-78, HARVEST MOON ADDITION
ZE-216-78, Agricultural to Single-Family & Two-Family Residential
FOGG. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
4. PE-1266-78, WEST FARMS TRACT PLAT #4
ZE-215-78, Agricultural to Single-Family & Two-Family Residential
M00 RE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - EXTENSION OF TIME & CHANGE OF CONDITION
5, pW-930A & 9306-73, SPOKANE LAKE PARK 2ND & 3RD ADDITION
ZW-132 & 132A-73, Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban and
Single-Family Residential
PONDEROSA NORTHWEST, INC . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
- - - -
. c . . .
.:1_ J. . J. ~ .
. . . . . .
I
. ..r ~
~
AGENDA, January 30, 1979 TELEPHONE; 456-.22a5
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING SUHDIVISION kI.EARING EXAMINER COMM(TTEE
TIME: Tuesday, .lanuary 30, 1979 ~ 8:30 A.M. (Item No. 6 on Morning Agenda)
PLACE: Broadway Centre fluilding= 2nd Floor
N 721 Jef f erson , Spokane
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASStFtCATION
PE-1206-78, SUMMERFIELD EAST
ZE-202-78, AGR I CULTURAL TO S tNGLE-FAMt LY RES I DEPJT f AL
a. Location: Located in tEte Trentotiood area of the Spokane
Va 1 1 er ad j acent tQ and north pf We 1 1 es 1 e.y,
Avenue, west of Progress Road, south of Fos'ker Rpad and ea5;t of Ptannen Road.
b. Legal Description: Section 35, Township 26N; Rdnge 44 E.W.M, .
That port i on of the NW 1 j4 of 5ect ion 35, i,n
the County of Spokane, State of Washington, 1Xi'ng SEIy of For[cer Road and
SWIy of the power line easement as- recorded on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's
File No. 572309A; Also the E 1/2 0f E 1/2 of $W 1/4 of said 5ection~ And Also
that port i on of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of sa id Sect i on 1 y ing 5Ff,l Y of sa i,d power
line easement; Except the Spokane valley Land & Water CompanyA5 canal right-of-way;
And Except commencing at the 54! corner of the SW 1/4 pf the SE 1j4 of sai,d section;
thence E along the S line of said section, a distance of 35Q feet, thence N; a
distance of 933•42 feet; thence W a distance of 700 fts thence S a distance of
933•42 feet to the S line of said Section 35; thence E along the S line of said
section, a distance of 350 feet, to the point of beginni,ng, And Except Wellesley
Avenue; And Except that portion of the NW 1j4 of said section lying within
Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded i,n volume "0"
of Plats, page 51.
c. Sponsor: Wi 11 iam W. Main
E 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, WA. 99216
d. Surveyor: . Milton T. 8ooth
E 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, wA. 99216
e. S i te S i ze: 91 act-es
f. Number of Lots: 268
g. Proposed Land Use; Single fam'kly dwellings
h. Existing Zoning; Agricultural
i. Proposed Zoning: Single-,,-Famil}r Residenti,al
j. Water Source: Trentwood lrri.gation Distri,ct -#3
k. School District: East Valley #361
l. Method of Sewage Disposal; [ndividual septic tanks
M. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at thi.s heari.ng maY be
whether or not this proposal wi,ll have a
significant adverse environmental impact. An Environmenta) lmpact Statement has
been prepared and circulated for public response and comments, A copy of the
document is a available for public inspection at the Spokane County Public Liorary,
Valley Branch, E 12004 Main, or at the Spokane County Planning Department,
Broadway Centre Building, N 721 Jefferson.
(OVER FOR MAP)
-6-
1
1
P ~
07
?40 , ,N
~ , ~ 4 • /
. ~ ~
o ~
~ r I ~ ~ • .
EL Z 4
oe
1
l~' N
U. o~,01
►
~.•~r
1 a ~ ~jCV100\ roo
• ~ ' ~W `58 t3~ ~ ~ i ~
C
0 oo
fL
C
5c hoa 15C I~ ~54
• .ccLOw
; Z „ ~5+ : ~ ° ~ - 't
,
1J 0 _ ~ ~ (4fa w7 ~ ~ H ~~r , o
4~ iaQ ~a5 = ~ ~ ~ ~
r ~ a J4 4~ ~p V4M
Q, CL t n% c?cv P s 14•
' I'~ C V+ ~ ~.u•F~'~~4' ~ ~
41 ~ F,~E " ~ t • ~
H ROy
p^ ~ ~ ~
`O~,GFEL~ ~
.
t;' . • iE ` 2 041 wAp"r
d ~ 4 ~
.
= 7 c ~`~~~C►' ~ 7 ~ t
s .
"i i ~t ~ ~J E \ ~
~ ~
~
41 rENO
~ 1DZ6,
R
R ~
~
sy
STAFF ANALYSIS - JaI11.13r'y 30a 1979
PE-1206-78, S[JMMRFIEZD EAST
ZE-202-75, A~~~CULTURAL TO SII~~LE FPMTLY RESIDENTIAL
P~~IM~NARY SUBDIVISIONS ,AND ZQNE CLASSIFICATI0N5
I. GENERAL II+IFORMATION
This prelimiaary plat has ~ad an Enviroamental Impact 5tatement prepared for it.
The Final Envi.ronmental Impact Statement was puYalished as of January 1979. The
purpose of the Environnental Impact Statemeat is ta provide amaximwm amout of
information to the decision makers. Any uinmitigated, adverse impact identified in
the statement, iAcluding review commentary ia respanse to the dra~t impact
statement, can be cansidered grounds 4f the Hearing Exami.ner ta coadition or deny ~
the proposal, pursuant to RCW 43.21C.060.
A. Locatioa
The site is lacated in the Spokaae Val1ey near the Trentwovd area. ~t is
adjacent to aad north of Wellesley Avenue, west o€ Progress Road, south o€
Forker Raad ansi east af Baanea Rvad.
B. Proposal
µ 91 acres subdivided inta 268 lots for single family use which inciudes 3
oae-acre parcels aloag Porker Road.
- Typical lot frantage = 80+
- Typical lot size = 10,004 sq, ft.
~ Lvts per gross acre - 2,9
C. Reiatioaship ta tbe Comprehensive Plan
The approved map of the Comgrehensive elan indicates residential usage of this
area, as weIl as all nearby surrouading laxads, with no density designation.
D. Laad Use Aaalysfs:
1. Existing Land Uses (see page 39, D,E,I.S.)
The site is 1eve1 land at the hase of the North Spakane Valley wall and is
cultivated with crags that include wheat, barley and hay. In the center of
the gropased plat and adjaceat ta Wellesley Avenue is the Trentwood Elementary
School grounds.
T❑ the sough across Wellesley there are several residential subdiv%sions
zncluding: Kingst 11,000 sq. ft. lats} Kruger's 14,400 sq. ft. lvts and
Fltzp$tr1Ck's with less than 10,000 sq. ft. iats. Uirectly south of the
Trentwood Schaol site is the East Valley Baptist Church and further svuth ta
Treat there are a variety of land uses including small acreage tracts, mobile
homes, residences and commercial uses.
_ 6g _
1
STAFF ANALYSIS - January Y'- 1979 SUMMERFIELD EA'~'-"` - continued
-
East af the proposed plat alang Wellesley is the East Valley .Tunior High and
. the Tren.twood Irrigatian District well. Further east is the East Valley High
School and beyond that within k mi1e af the p roposed plat, is the WelYesley
Manor Subdiva sion with 111000 to 12,000 sq. ft. Yots.
Lat~d -use north and northeast include : The Bonmeville Power Right-of#Way,
larger acreage parcels under cultivation and widely scattered hi11side
residences assaciatec3 with various farming uses.
To t$e west, there are parcels utilized for farming and aloag Barnen Rvad
resideati,al subdivisinns such as: Pace Addition 14,500 sq. ft. lots,
Alexanderls 40,000 sq, ft. lats, Curry One 15,000 sq. ft. lots and Swaa Aeres
with 17,000 sq. ft. 1ots. I}irectly west of this proposal is the West Farms
Tract No. 4 plat proposal wi.th 11,700 sq. ft. lots which is to be heard by the
Heariag Examiner on this agenda. ,
2. Compatibzlity with Existiag Land TIses
This proposal appears to be generally compatible with other subdivisions that
have aecurred in the immediate area, although fnr the most part, the lot sizes
appear to be smalier than thase that have been app raved aorth af We11esley.
It should also be noted that urban density deveZopments can be expected near
schoal sites and if these development Grends cdntinue, aay cflnflicts that
exist hetween this plat and present uses would decrease over time.
II. SPECIAL INFORMATION
Those items normally covered by the staff within this section of the staff analqsis
have beea addressed i.n the Sum erfield East E.I.S. That document wi1l be retained
in the plat file as an official gart of this analysis.
III. ZONING ANALY5IS
The ~ite is presently zoned Agricultu~al and the sponsor is proposing all 268 lots
fvr single family residential zoniag. Althvugh there wilI be some conflicts ►ai-th
gresent agricultural activities, the staff feels that due to the proxirnity af the
schools and arterials,develogment gressures in the area, and the zntended uses of
the propasal the change to single family zoning would be appropriate. (Refer page
41, D.E.I.S. )
IV. ENU'IROI+MEN"rAL REVIEW
(Reference the Summerfield East E.I.S.)
V. CONDITIOIdS
If appraval is granted, the fallowing ccanditioas are recommended.
PTQTE: Aay amendrnents to said canditioas are stated separately and l3sted hereafter
1. That the plat be designated as indicated on the preliminary plat of recard
aad/or attached skxeets as aoted.
- 6c -
. .
STAFF ANALYSIS - January-10, 1979 SUMMERFIELD -`ST - continued
2. That a statement be placed in the dedication to the effect that no more than
one dwelling structure be placed on any one lot, nor shall any lot be further
subdivided for the purposes of creating additional lots or building sites
without filing a replat.
3. That the plat provide for right of way width for streets as indicated on the
preliminary plat of record.
4. That appropriate provision be made that the following described property be
held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedicated or deeded: A
1' strip at the ends or edges of all streets that terminate or border the plat
boundary. (Temporary cul de sacs are required when streets terminate at the
plat boundaries.)
5. That appropriate street names be indicated.
6. That appropriate utility easements be indicated on copies of the approved
preliminary plat for distribution to the Planning Department and the utility
companies. Written approval of the easements by the utility company must be
received prior to the submittal of the final plat.
7. That the plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection be approved by
the water supplier and fire protection district. Said water plan must also
have been approved by the appropriate health authorities. The health
authorities, water supplier (purveyor), and fire protection district will
certify, prior to the filiag of the final plat, on the face of said water plan
that the plan is in conformance with their requirements and will adequately
satisfy their respective needs. Said water plan and certification will be
drafted on a transparency suitable for reproduction.
The purveyor will also certify prior to the filing of the final plat on a copy
of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangements have been made
with the plat sponsor for construction of the water system, in accordance with
the approved plan, and in accordance with a time schedule. The time schedule
will provide, in any case, for completion of the water system and inspection
by the appropriate health authorities prior to application for building
permits within the plat. The contractual arrangements will include a
provision holding Spokane County and the purveyor harmless from claims by any
lot purchaser refused a building permit due to the failure of the plat sponsor
to satisfactorily complete the approved water system.
The plat dedication will contain a statement to the effect that the public ,
water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local
fire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the
subdivider will provide for individual domestic water service as well as fire
protection to each lot prior to sale qf each lot.
8. That a certificate of title be furnished the Planning Department prior to the
filing of the final plat.
9. That the preliminary plat be given conditional approval to February 1, 1980.
-6D-
. .
STAFF ANALYSIS - January 1979 SUMMERFIEI.D EP°T - continued
r~ (
10. That a declaration of Non-Significance be issued, ia accordance with
Section 11.15.340 of the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance (SCEO) prior
to approval of this recommendation by the Board of County Commissioners, or
that any approving action in accordance with SCEO 11.15.340.
NOTE: The official file contains an environmental checklist for the
proposal and a staff review of their checklist as required by
WAC 197-10-320. -
11. That conditional approval of the plat is given subject to the dedication of
right of way to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the
County Engineer.
12. That plans, profiles, and cross sections showing proposed street centerline
and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to
' construction and the filing of a final plat.
13. The drainage plans and design calculations showing the grades and alignment of
drainage facilities be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to
construction and the filing of a final plat.
14. Construction within the proposed public streets and easements shall be
performed under the direct supervision of a licensed land surveyor, who shall
be responsible for perpetuating all evidence of the location of survey
monuments which may be distrubed during construction and who shall furnish the
County Engineer with "As Built" plans and a certificate in writing that all
improvements were installed to the lines and grades shown on the approved
construction plans and that all disturbed monuments have been replaced.
15. No construction work is to be performed with the Public Right of Way until a
permit has been issued by the County Engineer. All work is subject to
inspection and approval by the County Engineer.
16. All construction within the Public Right of Way is to be completed prior to
filing the final plat or a bond in the amount estimated by the County Engineer
to cover the cost or construction of improvements, constructioa certification,
"As Built" plans, and monumenting the street centerlines, shall be filed with
the County Engineer.
17. No direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roads are
constructed to County Standards and established as County Roads.
18. Road design, rough grading construction, and drainage control for ~ rights of
ways and Stub Road connections are the responsibility of the developer.
19. That a name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be
approved by the County Assessor and the Planning staff.
20. Prior to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the
plat lies within the recorded service area of the proposed water district.
- 6E -
• , . '
STAFF ANALYSIS - Januar 1979 SUI`MERFIELD " ST - continued
Special Conditions
21. That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and
the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by
the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of
County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval; as
instructed by the Planning Department staff.
22. That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Single
Family Residential.
23. That the project sponsor is responsible for requesting a time extension to
review any preliminary plat approval.
24. That a public water system serviced by Trentwood Irrigation District #3, and .
including fire flows, serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot.
25. That an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by the Health
Office prior to the signing of the final plat, if more than a total of 318
dwelling units are authorized within the plat. -
26. That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be
reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County
Utilities Engineer and the County Health District.
27. The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized the
use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system.
28. That all public roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifi-
cations of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access
to lots of the plat shall be paved and curbed to the standards of the County
Engineer.
29. That no direct access be allowed from lots to Wellesley Avenue and Progress
Road and Forker Road.
30. That the owner dedicate 20 feet additional right-of-way along Forker Road.
31. That the sponsor allocate and redesign north access road intersection at
Progress Road. Design standards for neighborhood collection arterial should
be used. .
32. That the sponsor provide 50 foot radius cul-de-sac rights-of-way.
33. That the sponsor provide sidewalks along pathway routes as designated by the
County Engineer, and shown on the preliminary plat of record, and along
Wellesley Avenue.
34. That the sponsor provide stub road connections, to the west, to access center
of Tract 103 and south line of Tract 113 in West Farms Irrigated Tracts.
-6F-
~
~ ~ ~ •
5POKANE VALLtq FIRE DEPARTIAENT
1
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 ~ TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
v`Tt 4, e,
January 23, 1979
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director
Spokane County Planning Commission
Second Floor Broadway Centre Building
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260 ,
Dear Mr. Dayharsh :
r
The followin9 Preliminary su idnvisipns and zone classification
for upgrading has been revi edofoir\fi re protection:
~ U
PE-1162A-77 Moab Meadows/3rd Addition
ZE-204-77 McKinley
PE-1206-78 Summer~iel?o East z
ZE-202-78 Main ~
PE-1249-78 Greenhou:se-AddTtion
ZE-190-78 G?,thrie ` p • ,
hw"
PE-1250- 78 Wa,ggoner 15t Addi ti on '
ZE-214-78 '~aggoner
PE-1161A-78 Sunset Meadows' \
ZE-121-78 $wanson % Homestead Construction
PE-126,4-78 Harvest Moon Addition
ZE-216-18 , Fogg . '
PE-1266- 78 Wes t Farms Tract Piat #4 ,
Z E- 215- 78 Moo re All the above need mains and hydrants to be installed in their,area.
. ,
.r A,Cook ECEIVED
Lt. of Inspectors R AC: sn J A N 2 n 1979
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. V /
PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI VES
~
- OFF""''E OF COUN`TY ENGI • ER
SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
Doie 3A,.r,/4 rL`! ~
Inter-office Communication
To PIANNING IEPARTMENT
From GARY KENNALY, PLANN ING & TRAFF IC DIV IS ION ENG INEFR T.JW~Subject ROAD CONDITIONS * FOR . ~ PLAT PE IZQlp ~i~ c~ZFiEc.~ 64ST
*CONDIT IONS C IRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONS ILIERAT ION - - -(PUBLIC ROAUMANDARDS - - PRNATE ROAD STANDARDS - - -
(0)-that conditional approval of the plat is given eub3ect to dedication of Right of Way and
approval of the road syetem in the plat by the County Engineer;
C~~2- hat plana, profilea, and cross eectione ehowing proposed atreet centerlina and curb grades 'De
submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filing of a final
plat;
~hat drainage plana and deaign calculationa shoWing the gradee and alignment of drainage
facilities be eubmitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the
f il ing of a f inal plat;
04 construction within the proposed public streete end easements ahall be performed under the
direct superviaion of a liceneed land aurveyor, uho shall be responaible for perpetuating a!s
evidence of the location of eurvey monuments vhich may be dieturbed during construction and
uho ahall furnieh the County Engineer with "Ae Built" plana and a certificate in writing that
all improvemente uere installed to the linee end grades shown on the approved construction
plana and that all disturbed monumente have been replaced;
E 5 o construction work ie to be performed Within the Public Right of Way until a permit has been
iesued by the County Engineer. All work is eubject to inspection and approvel by the County
Engineer;
CDIPPlat 11 conatruction within the Public Right of Way.is to be completed prior to filing the final
or a bond in the amount eetimated by the County Engineer to cover the coet of constructi;.L
of improvementa, construction certificatfon, "Ae Builtn plans, and monumenting th+e etreet
centerlines ehall be filed with the County Engineer;
E 7-no direct acceee from lots to 1/2 Right of Waya until such roada are conetructed to Cownty
Standarde and eetebliehed ae County Rodde;
(E S)no direct accese from lote to Stub Road connectione untfl euch roade are conatructed to County
Standarde and eetabliehed ae County Roade;
L99road deaign, conetruction, and drainage control for 1/2 Righta of Ways and Stub Road con-
nectiona are the reeponsibility of the Developer;
E10-that the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer a deaign propoeal acceptable
to the State Highway Department of the proposed State HighWay-County Road intereection.
State Highway Department approval of the proposed design must be received prior to the filing
of the final plat. Improvements to the State HighWay are to be the reeponsibility of the
rSponsor and may either be constructed or a bond to cover the cost of euch improvements
furniahed to the County Engineer in the amount as determined by the County Engineer and the
State Hi husy Department.
6UG
ti!)that a roada Within the plat be curbed and;Jw paved to the speciffcations of the Gounty
Engineer. Existing Gounty roada providing direct accees to lota of the plat shall be pavea
and.4M curbed to the standards of the County Engineer.
E12-Proposed private road(s) eerving lots With: no extension possible; extension to
serve 8 or lese lote; future public Right of Way tract.
E13-that private road(s) be improved to etandard adopted by the Board of County Commiaeionera.
(ED-no direct access from lote to CeV kg%lvE 4660 P Qoap AAv FaP~ &40t
E15-dedication of a0 I additionel Right of Way along FOxeaL A•04D.
E16-that the ouner, his grantees and asaigns egree to participate in and not oppoee or proteat
an RID on
~.N6 0W 4-CEE"SS R_n,*O 1A1T .FiZSer_?',wd .4 T
~E3~•J Si~D4~1.ps ~'2 /V~~G~lf a a~Z ti6o 1~ f~LL~=~-~oQ ~2~~ta L s~uJ AE ~/S'FD.
C~8 P/4zelpE so ~ lL"cvs xm cr~~-oE--s•~c~t. X.Ja.,irs o F~..~a Y,
~ PRev406 5_ZDEW4-(xs 41.o•Z PATWCA14-Y Z?y T~fc5--r Fkvwe~e2 l *..IZ •p- c.a.~~ c~~ ,~.~.✓vE-. ~
/4v1DE S7UF3 R640 C.6Avw1EGTi&W 7a TtfC l.vEST ro *GCESS CEvTFe a11
~
.
7-'L,q G.T / 03 4•vD $b v TN G1^/E o F TiBsJC7_
.
~ ~c~Gy ro~w 4M' _ ' ~ <<
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
~ E ffVer-Office Communicati on °
q~T„ o~S E C E
Date: August t, 1978
~UG 2 1978 SPOKAI~E COUNTY
T0: Spo~Cane ounty Planning Commission 2 PLANNtUG t1EPARTMENT
r~{ p FROM: Eugene ~~Jther, R.S.
PL - -
SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat - SiJMMERFIELD EAST
~ /;~06
1. Ref erences :
a. Map of subject, scale 1" = 200' by Richard Mason; undated, recieved
by this of f ice July 11, 1978o
b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geology North-Central Spokane and
Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Re-
sources, State of Washington, 1969.
c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Quality in the Spokane Valley, D.K. Todd, Section 208, [Jater Resources Study - Metro-
politan Spokane Region, U.S.Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District,
,
April 7, 1975.
d. Soil Survey, Spokane County Washington, Soil Conservation Service,
U.S.D.A., March, 1968.
e. Spokane County, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Consetvation
Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974.
f. Logs of Trentwood District wells in Township 26, Range 44, Sections
35.
g. Field Survey Report, Gene Sharp, Spokane County Health District, July 19,
1978.
h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973 and Spokane NE, U.S.G.S.,
1973.
2. Topography, soils and water.
a. This project lies in a.,relatively f lat area bounded on the South by
Wellesley Ave. on.yhe East by Progress Street, on the West by a point
1920' feet ilest of Progress. The North tioundary is 800 feet long,on
Forker Road extending East from the West boundary line. 1300 feet North
on Progress, the boundary cuts Horthwesterly across the plat to join
the boundary line at Forker Road. The plat is drained by a canal on the
East and a drainage ditch along the North boundary. Drainage problems
appear insignif icant. It is located over the Spokane Valley Aquifer.
b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison gravelly loam with 0 to 5% slopes.
They have a septic tank f ilter f ield limitation of slight with possible
contamination of groundwater.
SCHD-ADM-118 '
,
• '
, August l, 1978 . ,
Page 2
Stumnerf ield East
c. Geologically the soils are glaciof luvial deposits; stream-laid sand and
gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated
glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked
by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large
amounts of water.
d. The data from a well belonging to the Trentwood Irrigation District indi-
cated a total nitrogen level of 1.8 ppm. The Trentwood Irrigation District
has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon
completion of agreements with the developer.
3. Impact discussion.
a. The plat sponsor has proposed 268 lots on 91 acres. Each lot is to be
served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage dis-
posal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact
on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage
disposal.
b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered
typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater,
and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley
upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that:
(1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage
treatment eff luent does reach and recharge the groundwater.
(2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the
groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por-
tion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the
groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phos-
phates, which are known to react with soil particles, or
nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less
than the total found in septic tank effluents.
(3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater
flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol-
ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg(1
(milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back-
ground of 155 mg/t. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental
concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."---"The
analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when com-
pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate
volume and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the
present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial
proportion of the ultimate level."
c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of
the groundwater as in the range of 1.8 ppm. A projected incre-
mental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges
to 1.95 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards
permit up tQ 10 ppm.
>
i,
. August t, 1978
. ,
Page 3
Suramerf ield East
d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the ground-
water have the follawing general characteristics:
(1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to
surf ace waters would require at least tertiary treatment
and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge
from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not
currently economically available for this project.
(2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend
on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as la-
goons, have saf ety hazards associated with them and
relatively poor community acceptance.
4. Recommend that:
a. The plat dedication will contain a statement to the eff ect ttaat: "The public
water system as approved by County and State Health authorities and the local
~ f ire district and purveyor will be installed within this plat, and the sub-
~divider will provide for indiYidual domestic water service as well as fire
protection to each lot prior to sale of each lot."
b,; The dedicatory language of the plat will state that each lot is authorized
the use of an individual on-site sewage disposal system.
c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this ~ off ice prior to the sfgning of the f inal plat if more than a total
of three-hundred eighteen (318) dwel"Ling units are authorized within
the plat.
d. A plan for water facilities adequate for domestic use, domestic irrigation
use and fire protection use shall be approved by the water supplier. Said
water plan must have been approved by the f ire protection district and the
, appropriate health authorities. The health authorities, water supplier
~
(purveyor), and f ire protection district will certify, prior to the f iling
of the f inal plat, on the f ace of said water plan that the plan is in con-
formance with their requirements and will adequately satisfy their respective
needs. Said water plan and certification will be draf ted on a transparency
suitable for reproduction.
sm
cc: Richasd Mason, 12706 Noara, Spokane 99212
TFEG, E. 12929 Sprague, Spokane 99216
UM Investmcnt, N. 8601 Division, Spokane 99206
~MlL!~] _xA H dW3~'~nlfiifi ✓ ~0~_.1~
y t R
Transam eriLu Transamerica r ~
. r Title Insurance Company ~ rv ~P, g
Titie Insurance Services
North 720 Argonne Road ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Spokane, Washington 99206 y
(509) 922-2222 p K
a ,
- - - SPOKANE COU~r
~~~G DEPARTMENT
RE CE I V E CERTIFICATE TO PLAT
JU INI 2 9 i5iO Order No. : 89812-M
SPOKANE COUNTY Certificate for Filing Proposed
PLANNING DEPARTMENT, Plat of SLTNMERFIELD EAST
-p t , 2'o ~
Spokane County Planning Commission
N 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington
Gentlemen:
In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this
Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County
Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk
of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from
such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following
described land situate in Spokane County, to-wit:
That portion of the Northwest quarter of Section 35, Township
26 North, Range 44 E. W. M., lying Southeasterly of Forker Road;
That portion of the Northeast quarter of Section 35, Township 26
North, Range,.44 E. W. M., lying Southwesterly of Progress Road;
The East half of the East half of the Southwest quarter and the
West half of the Southeast quarter of Section 35, Township 26
North, Range 44 E. W. M., lying Westerly of Progress Road;
EXCEPT the right of way for a canal of the Spokane Valley Land
& Water Company;
AND EXCEPT commencing at the Southwest corner of the Southwest
quarter of the Southeast quarter of said Section; thence in an
Easterly direction along the South line of said Section, a distance
of 350 feet; thence due North, a distance of 933.42 feet; thence
West a distance of 700 feet; thence due South a distance of
933.42 feet to the South line of Section 35, Township and range
aforesaid; thence in an Easterly direction along the South line
of said Section, a distance of 350 feet to the place of beginning;
AND EXCEPT Wellesley Avenue;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of 14ashington.
(continued)
a
~
Page 2
Order No. 89812-M
VESTED IN:
OLD NATIONAL BANK as Trustee under Faye S. Elliott living Trust dated
September 28, 1972, as her separate property and MERCEDES JESKE, as
her separate property
EXCEPT IONS :
1. 1% excise tax, if unpaid.
2. General taxes for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $30.31,
i-Lzcluding Weed District Tax (Parcel No. 35641-9049)
General taxes for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $198.98,
including Weed District Tax (Parcel No. 35644-9050)
General taxes for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $205.07
including Weed District Tax (Parcel No. 35643-9017)
3. Assessments for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $35.32 to
Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3.
Assessfnents for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $41.47 to
Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3.
Assessments for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $181.77 to
Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3.
Assessments for the last half of 1978 in the amount of $155.69 to
Trentwood.llrrigation District No. 3.
4. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District
No. 3.
5. Reservation of mineral rights by Northern Pacific Railway in
Deed dated September l, 1883 and recorded October 20, 1886 as
Document No. 946, as follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known,
• or shall hereafter be ascertained to contain coal or iron, and
also the use of such surface ground as be necessary for mining
operations; an d the right of access to such reserved and
excepted coal and iron lands for the purpose of exploring,
developing and working the same.
6. Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or fills upon property
herein described, as granted by Deed recorded as Document No.
432623.
7. Easements over and across said property for constructing and
maintaining telephone and electric power lines disclosed by
Document No. 324569.
(continued)
s
'
Page 3
Order No. 89812-M
8. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOT' :
Grantee: The United States of America
Purpose: Electric power transmission lines and
one or more telephone and/or telegraph lines
with right to clear right-of-way and keep
clear of brush, timber, inflammable
structures, and fire hazards with right
to remove danger trees
Da ted: August 25, 1942
Recorded: January 19, 1943
Recording No.: 572309A
9. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Grantee: Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3
Purpose: Underground pipeline of the district
for the transportation and delivery of
water, of a size not exceeding 12 inches
in diameter
Dated: January 12, 1966
Recor ded: January 17, 1966
Recording No. : 171591C
10. UNRECORDED CONTRACT OF SALE AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
Seller: Old National Bank of Washington, a national
banking association, as trustee pursuant
to that certain caritten Trust entitled
"Living Trust of Faye S. Elliott" dated
September 28, 1972 and Mercedes Jeske, as
her separate property
Purchaser: Keith D. Rieckers and Katherine A. Rieckers,
4' husband and wife, and Ronald P. Douglas
and Vicki L. Douglas, husband and wife, and
Paul A. Bastine and Janet E. Bastine, husband
and wife
Dated: March 15, 1977
Disclosed by:
PURCHASER'S ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT AND DEED AND THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS THEREOF: (as to an undivided one-quarter interest)
Grantor: Keith D. Rieckers and Katherine A. Rieckers,
husband and wife, and Ronald P. Douglas
and Vicki L. Douglas, husband and wife,
and Paul A. Bastine and Janet E. Bastine,
husband and wi fe
Grantee: Kenneth J. Tupper and Sharon L. Tupper,
husband and wife
Dated: October 5, 1977
Recorded: October 24, 1977
Recording No.: 7710240085
Said document affects a portion of herein described property
(continued)
.+._i
♦ ~
i
•
Page 4
Order No. 89812-M
11. Right, title or interest of Timorhy L. Martin and Myra Martin,
husb and and wife as disclosed by Financing Statement recorded
as Document No. 7512050072 and by Documend No. 7409180053,
copies attached.
NOTE 1: A Power of Attorney recorded April 17, 1974, sufficient
in fortan to authorize a conveyance or mortgage of the herein
described pxoperty was recorded as Document No. 7404170016,
executed by Sharon L. Tupper and Kenneth J. Tupper.
NOTE 2: General taxes for the year 1978 have been paid in full
in the amount of $10.16, including Fire Patrol Tax and Weed
District Tax (Parcel No. 35642-9049)
Records examined to June 20, 1978 at 8:00 A. M.
TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
~
- BY •
Phyl is Vaughan
Title Officer
.,~Q'-: IPEC
Copies attached
4'
kk
. , . . • . •
• .
~ .
. ;
E
_
N isi-I. SCNtU1..T7 & TOMn.,\m,, . ' V
. . ~
ATTnitNEYS AT I.;\W . . ~.A~ ~ ~ g78 ~ ~ ,
I~ .
. . ' . E~ 17 'YAi~l.SE~'I BU11.1'rl:a+ j
_ . . - ' SNlI(A1V1.'. 1VA~iHiNCiTQN JEI~C) 1 . SPpKq • '
. . . _ . . , . . , P~NN . NE,epUN~' .
A. F~~I. ~I-I . . . May 2 41 .19 7 8 . , . _ 'HGDEPARTME"N
' ti'1':~~ILLiY tt. tiC;HI~L'IZ • . ' : ' ' - . . T,
W11.i-.1A41._Z. 'fC1M13Aitl, dkt. • ' ' • . _ 1'I:I.I l•I1~~I~1? a,i~?1 ..I~if°itflflfl
" Mr o Dick MasoiR, . . IPEC . = " • , ' , "U .
` E. 12706 Nora
Spokane, Washington 99216' Re: Summerf ield Plat Applicatioi-i. : , - . , , . . • , .
_ Dear Dick .
Af ter conversations. with. Jim. Emacio atid T'om Moser,"~ we -
have agreed on the Fo -1 ],owing ,procedure f or proces s ing , the * Summerfield.Plat: First,. you should,ha"vo made inforzt~al._ contaJcts witix 'the,
, health -district and .erigineers'department, ~ and the-.present. plat design sho'uld,, in y,our opinion,-conform to= thejx general
- , , standards.
. . , - ' • . • , . ' , a . .
. You should then take,_the plat aifia. application -to Tom , Moser . The , f i ling f ee shQUld -be pai d and a redoiptissued.
. You and. 'I'om -Moser 'may f ind it convena;ent to = enter iftto., the ,
. ac~reer~ent to prepare, an .-EI5 and'pay thc requisite' fee at . this time as well. -You shoul&be aware that there ,seeins to
~ be some confusion as to whether -the~-.cantents Of. the EIS have 'beenpreviously discussed with Totri Moser. - At any xate, it is =
advisable at '.thi.s time to f:irm up with- Tom the inforrnation to . . - be' included in the EIS, _ , . _ - , - - - kfter the draft. JFzS is pre~yaroj3; it should be circ;ulated ~ to the appropri,ate agenCi.as an3 a hea,r ing on the draf t EIS '
d. should be held-'before tihe pla.nning commissioii. ' I would an-,
. bticipate that corrunents.' fron-i the health district-.and the en-
. . . gineers regarding plat des-ign.-and. any proposed "conaitions will, appear as coftments to the draf t EIS ~ '
. . . . . . .
. Af ter 'the comment period has expiared and the f ina l -
EIS is prepared, `.then the plat should be -'set for hearing be- . fore the planning commission, . , - , . As you can see, Dick,.I have_ sent copies of this letter . .
to Tom Moser and Jim Emacio..', I asSume that if they haue . ,
, • any comments regarding the procedure I haveoutlined for .
you, the~ -wi11 contac-t -me as -soon as. possible. .
p'Ir. D 'lck. Mason .
May 24, 197$ 7
Page 2
.
~ J ~ ~oh.i.r~~, .~,t is a.mnor~.. tnt .~or you to ge~t~ ~,~~~et 1~,~witki
Tow! swsvr I as baon a-,,4 yc,~kt can : T wi11 kae ~~ck trQa~ vaca- .
tim, oj1 ►ku.3 5 to assist y~~~ ~wd Tom on any' quesl:ions' eithC-I ~
:.~t Y~~~ ~~ijb f; tiave,. ~ - ' . . .
- ` Very, truly yourS,,, ,
. ~ FISH, SCHTrT:T Z ~ T[ ~"7BARITT . ~ .
~ 'S tagi.tey R. Sch.U ltz
cc : J'ames Emacio
,
. ~ • ~ Tom Maser'
- ~ Keii Tuppe,r
Bill .11-9-llin ~ - `
- ;
~ ~ ~ 1
I'IiOC1AlAI UtltRYy
FY S
S C
cxtai.~~r2 ~ To~~ia~~~:r
AT'f'OI2 NF N' S A 1' ! q1d ~CL p AA
617 !'AUi-S} N D[II.LialNCZ
~ i ~'16~I i1}.f_i 'tl•. il !iJ ~J•e~ r, r"
SI~AlCrl~\'E. 14A$t•I1`C3TOf! flfl2C11
~ l
M.r_. Tom MosEr
Coun ty P Zann i-ng Dep t.
N. 811 J'efferson
Spokane, washington 99201
~
;
. ~ , ; : ~ S E C E I V E
S7 ORI~i l.)I~1I1~UiG1.. R1.I ORT
SMihll.lll:Il;l,l) I:r1,tiT ;EP 12 I978
Ilzc proposcd subdivision would plat 86 acres o.E cultivatec~,` MENT,
ap~~roxin~ately 266 lots (tyl)ical lot s~.ze 10,000 sq, ft. r'~ 1
hc p<ived tJ1tIl COl1CI-crc curbs. .titon» watrr disposal proposccl by on-sitc
d M,re 11 s .
For purposcs of detcnnining the effects of urbarlization on stonn water run-
off lIl the drainage areas, Urbali Nydrology for Sn-ill jVatersheds, Tecl-ulical
Releasc No. 55 by the Lngineering Divisioil of the Soil Conservation Service,
U. S. DepartnL-nt of Agrxculture, Ja.nuary 1975 (SCS i~bthod), will be used.
1) To dcterriiirlc pcak ratcs oE rwloff irom tlle overall project :
0 o f SCS
a) Soil `Typc l3as in Basin Classificatiojl
Garrison Gravelly Loam Overall 100 B
Descriptioii of Soi1s : The soil is made up of sorrewhat
excessively drained, gravelly or stony soils that formed
under grass i1i glacial outwash, and has moderately rapid
pcrr,r- ability.
b) S1ope of the basin 0 0- 8 0.
c) Roughly 100 0 of the land is cul.tzvateci with conservation
_ treatment. Present condition yiElds a P,unoff Curve Nwmber
("N) of 71. ruture conditions of 1/4 acre residential lots,
approxtrnately 40% impervious, yiclcls a CN of 75.
d) The 24-hour precipitation for the arca for a SO-year storm
is 2.4 inches.
e) Use of attached Figures I y II.
2) Calculations:
a) Overall basin present rtmoff
rlrea = 86 acres
CN = 71
Runoff depth = .46 in.
Flat slope of 1%
Feak discharge = 27 cfs/in.
Slopc Eactor 1.00
Q= 1.(27 cFs/in) .46 in. = 12.40 cfs
Olrerall basiil futurc rwioff
ON = 77
Runoff depth = .70
Peak discllarge = 35 cfs/in.
Slope factor 1.00
Q=1(s5) .70 = 24.S cfs
.
. ' . , .r
3) Drainagc Proposal
From thc resul.ting calculations, wc scc that the plat will
double tJic: runolr ivitli luturc clcvclopmcnt. l2cquircments
are that oile (louble barrcl ar-ywcll wi 11 di.spose of I>Kcfs;
w.ith tll.is in mincl, wc sce tliat tlicrc .is ncarly 25 cfs of
runo.Ef necding to be clisposccl o f during a SO-year storm
resultiilg in a mini.inum rccomiicndcd th cirywells.
Usiilg past subciivision c,lcvelopment stuc]ics in the valley
area in similar soils, I have come up with some figures
shotiving that onc drywcll is needed for every four to six
residcntial lots. Using aii average of five, this would
mean that a possible 57 dY}wells could be proposea for
the plat site. _
There would be some off-site draiilage flow From the back
lots along t}le tivest project bowidary anci the adjacent lots
along tlle sc}lool site property. The flows crossing these
bow-idaries ivill be miiiimal.
For this plat, on-site disposal is practical and capable
of rel ieving the ruiioFf.
.
Along with tl►is study of the plat area, we have studied the drainage area
above tlie plat which cluring high rwloff pcriods of the year has overflowed
tlie nearby wliaT4)roved canal alid created problEms over the roadway and along
the bounciary of the proposed projcct site.
I have coine up ivith some calculata.ons baseci on the Spokane County Soil Survey
and the Soil Conservation Service TR #55. 1liese calculations show that there
could be some rcasonably high flows.
Calculations:
450 acres Class "B"
Sub Area I= 645 acres (125 acres Class "C", 70 acres Class "A")
Reach Description of floiv Slope ( o) Leneth (ft. )
A to B cultivated farm lalld 3 2380
B to C shallolv drair thul stand forest 3 3170
C to D ste@per draiv thin stand forest 7 3350
235 acres Class "B"
Sub Area II = 360 acres (20 acres Class "A", 105 acres Class "C")
F'.each llescription of flow Slope ( o) Len¢th (ft. )
A to 13 sliallow draiv tllin stalid forest 20 1980
B to C shallow draw thin stand forest 5 4360
C to D steeper draiv thin stalld forest 8 3960
Sub Area III = 220 acres (20 acres Class "!1", 200 acres Class "B")
Reacll UcScription of flow Slope Len8th (ft. )
A to B steep draiv thin stand forest 16 3160
B to C steep draw thin stand forest 12 2770
- 2 -
<
SLIli A1'Ca I
Reach A- B 2380 ft. = 2975 sec.
.3 it/sce
B - G 3170 ft. = 2641 sec.
1.2 ft/sec
C - D 3350 ft. = 1914 sec.
1.75 ft/scc
7530 sec.
Tc = 7530 sec = 2,1 hr.
3600 sec/hr
Sub Area II
Feach A- B 1980 ft. = 619 sec.
3.2 ft/sec
B- C 4360 ft. = 2725 sec.
1.6 ft/sec
C- D 3960 ft. = 1980 sec.
2.0 ft/sec
5324 sec.
Tc = 5324 sec - 1.5 lir.
3600 sec/hr
Sub Area III
Reach A- B 3160 ft. = 1128 sec.
2.8 ft/sec
Il- C 2770 ft. = 1154 sec.
2.4 ft/sec
2282 sec.
Tc = 2282 sec .6 hr.
3600 sec/hr
- 3 -
.
Su~) llrca I
I.and Usc /lcres CN Product
Cultivated land (Group C) 125 78 91,750
C~iltivated ltilcl (Crot,tp B) 120 71 8, 520
T}iin stand Forest (Group A) 70 45 3,150
Thin stand forest (Group B) 330 66 219780
G4S 43,200
weightecl C~r I= 43200 s 67
645
Sub Area I I
La.nd Use Acres QN Product
Thin stand forest (Group A) 20 45 900
T}Iin stand forest (Group C) 40 77 3,080
T}11J1 stand forest (Group li) 115 66 7,590
Cultivated 1v7d (Group C) 65 78 5, 070
Cu1tilTated land (Group B) 120 71 8, 520
360 25,160
weigllted CN = 25160 = 70
360
Sub Arca III
Land Us e Ac re s CN P roduc t
Pasturc poor (Group A) 20 68 1, 360
Pasture poor (Group B) 120 79 9,480
Thin stand timber (Group B) 80 66 51280
220 16,120
weighted ON = 16120 = 73
220
- 4 -
,
~
Sul) Arca Drain. 11rca 1'imc ol Conccntrat.ion Runof C Curvc Runoff*
(111i. ) (hrs. ) Nwnbcr (in. )
1. 1.00 2.10 67 .33
II. .55 1.50 70 .42
III. .35 .GO 73 .51
~
Table 2-1 for 50 year 24 }wur prcciPitation P= 2.4 inches
Rainfall
Ci.n• ) Ni
65 67 70 73 75
2.0 .14 .24 .38
2.4 .27 .33 .42 .51 .60
2.5 .30 .46 .65
DI SC-iA]:GE StYWARY
Sub Drainage Rain- Rw1- 12.1 12.5 12.9 13.0
area Tc iNrea fall C}V off hr. hr. hr. hr.
(hr.) (mi.) (in.) (in.) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
I. 2.1 1.00 2.4 67 .33 21 31 56 60
11. 1.5 .55 2.4 70 .42 24 48 55 52-
111. .6 .35 2.4 73 .51 62 37 23 20
lotal Coinposite liydrograph at Ellcl of Areas 107 116 121 132
Use 150 cfs for a conservative number.
Ik:termine flow in trapezoidal open chamiel.
Faisting canal cross section along projECt bowidary:
j-Vidth = 4.0' -
6' deep knoi,m Q = 150 cfs during high ninoff
14' wicle at top
Side Slope = .5:1 ,
Q= I.49xAR2/3S1/2
11
assume n = .035
trial clepth of 4.0 Sives Q = 138 c£s
trial depth of 4.1 gives Q= 148 cfs
-5-
-
, •
• •
flssuming clcpth oF cha.nncl to he 4.1' high, tlien we can asswTie tliat the
culvcrt.s :irc ca(' iiiq)roj)cr siz.ing, causing the carlal to brcccli.
Us.ing "Ilancihook Of St(;CI DY'a111:1gC & Ilzghw:iy (;onstruction l'roducts,"
published by American Iron and Steel Institute, a culvert of SO" in
di.arnetcr ivould bc needed to hajidle that hig}1 of flow at the existing
slopc ol the culvcrts. Tllcre arc nonc oF tllat size to bc found along
the canal system.
As shoivn on the plat map, there are a few things that could be done to
hclp insurc the saCcty of the proposcd projcct sitc.
-6-
~ ~ •ti~ 1 I 1 I ~ . y
~ ' f~i~r~~ - ~111,1I ~ \ n ~ ` ~
~ikt i~ 1 .
~ r~~►' U1.- . n.~ls
• f t • ~ ° ~,~1 ~IIi11 ~ 1• rl~ ~ ~~u, ~ N t
,~r l,l U f'r' ~
~ . !i(Il. soC ~ fl1 a 1
KC
~ • ~ ~ • ~ , ~ ~ ~i
~ ~ ~ - t► 4) • ~h" ; • ` GI R NpR~
K,- ~
~ ~~~V'~►. ~ ' ll~nl' ~ Q Uali 134 LI i \
(;t.~ ~
22 21
24
Nii9
~ 111oA ri n `
/ ~ ~il~ l)ad Npb [3a(;'
~n _ ~i) ►,A u B c+ • .
~
Q~ rvrA ~ - ~
wKC • •
~ t1i,ll ~ • E3ae
NpB .
NInr~~ . "ue
I 1 ' . N i
(,tA ~ f~
r' ~ ' ' ' ' ~ r • ~ 1 ; T ` ~ ' S~
U~ut; ~ J ' • , ~ 7 ^
.
NsN I
. / /1, - _ _ , NIiIl _ ~ _ , >f
. a _ . _ n zr.a- a.• i { - S % N' . _ . • l• ti~,, d~`'.
\ f u,.,r Kc ' I • ~ . r ~ ; .
N ~ ~ l~ ~ • ^ • w t
li►,c ? I Sr)(o ~ .
lal,t3 ~ n,A 'etoo
' ~ ' I11~11 ~ • vpe~ • 'R• •f t•:
huti , \ ~ ) , i 't
_ " ~ ' /I t : C ~ ' _ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ • j ^ ~ ~
~ • ' S . r ~.J ,1~ • ~
' r t F~ t ` 1~I ~ ' , 4` J~ . ` ~ r~~ .
~ ~ i'~~ ~C • 1
_ ' ~ . •J ~ ~J- • ~ ~ u ~ 1,~ ~ ` ' •t f , .
KIiA
1 1 I11~11 ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ •
J27 ~ , ,~~t► ',f ^ Ki26 . f •sc~~ ~uii,D
1 • _ _ - ~ ! ~ _ 1 , i(,
_"4= _ . ` ~ • - - . ~ t - . -~.a~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •,571 .
( ~ ~ 1/ ~,J , • • . • ~ ~ B
~ I~ ~ 1 . ~ . ~
I f %
. It~ 1~ r :~.L ` • ~8
, , _ . ~Ukc. • ~ ' p _ I.
: , ~ ~ / , , , ~ A , ~
tntA
I , ~ , I r ~{~•~t -
I • ,
, . .
7 4
,c
s
~ • I • tf~li o ~ / ,
l Olti /m ` •
1►1~11 Ilini - ' •1 ' , .
f /01~ ( fihfi ' , \>4t ~ • . It' ~ICfi BaF1 , Eluli SPC
Ni,q 10,~ ~13 O13
~ ~ ~ ` . - ~ ~ ~ • • - ~ ~ ^ ' • " y ~ ~ • ' • - ~ •
~ , ' ` • • ~
SV[["'r V
~../~~111~~ ~ r ~ i` ~ ~ ~ , • ~ ~
~ / \ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , • ~
1i k'
• i~~~ ~`t ' I I t , I~r~i.~ . ~ scc ; .
•a
~ , , . ' ~ ~ , ~ ObB
~i ~ [1wC l3A(~ ~ ~ ' . . , ,
E31 v Mc N
u ~i 6t G I ~ .
_ w~~~ ►r, ~ . l ~ i~ ~iY\ i~~JJ" 'ti ~ i~.~~+ \ '
E
Su
r^~sU ~ ~ ~1 ~ . . ' Kt
/ ~ l r8 ~l nl+ Sif \IS~~~1 , ~gt8 • ~ ,1 ' ~~r , ~ ~
r'ir ~ ~ 1 . • • , G
35' . • ' 36
i~~~~ ~ " ~ r ' • ~ .
lo° c.t c e.s F, i u~~~ ~
Gr-~u.e = ~3c~ o~.~~S nkc;• ~ ~
1 ? 50 ti,~ _ • ~ . • ' u 1 13
G`A 'f - 8 C\USS`~\~ IihA f A l~•f ~
1~1e. • ~
C~ e l'N `
il~ I ~ • ~f ~ ~ -
,
i ~
A
t _ r
. I , 1,_ ~ - - -~I._, _ _ . ~N e~lt 3 `Q V . • ° - - .
. I
• . ♦ ` ~ ~ • , • ' ~ r ~ ~ r ~ f , 51 1~~~, %Jy
~ ,I ~ Itr • ~ 1r~ ~.Il,
~ ~ ~ ' ~ 1 ~ ~ 1 0 ~ ~ • • ~ j/ ' ~ ~ I
N',
~ . ' 1 ^ , , ~ ' ~ 1 ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ rr • ~ . ~ = 1~.` ~
. ~ - + ~ ~ T f , ' 1 • ~ ~ ' • ~ : , 1' • _ ~ } ~ i' ~l , D~' s',
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~c ~ 1 ~~t~ ~ ~ , f s •,i ` r
. ~ ~ r . • , ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ . t1r ~ ~ ~ V• ' t ' ~
' I1 • 11 ~ ~ ' ~ S L,) ~ • ' ~ . . ,i r i~f
, ,~i` /~1 ♦ ~ , . ~ I ~ , ~ ~y ' ~I'~1 ,j~l
:''~1'•I'~. ~ ~`..i`' i ~ 'leoll
, ~ t ~ ~ / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ , „ ' t~~ L ' ; •
. . „ " ~y . 1i~ - • d~ +r r ' , t ` . • ~ r t IN
p \ L «~i ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ l ~ ~ . 4 ~ 1 . ~ , . i ~ I 1~ 4+ ~ i
~ • ~.p t ~n ,
•.y.. ~Y I~ ~ + ~ ~1 1 ~ • % r , ~ ' i r .
' ` ~*l~/ • M'rI ~ ~ / ~ ..wr`y ~ S~~ ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ t~`
I ~„'i i • O ~ ~ ~ I I I ` " ~ ~ '1
t I ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ i ( i r i ~ ~ " • ~ ~ ~ ; ^ r+ l f ~ ~ ~ r l
w.]►~~ / . ~'~y'l~ . .t,~ ' ~ `~,`,~1 l
. - ~ 1 ' ' ti ' ~ , t ' ~ _f • , ~i ,,f ` ~ , x
~ ~ , ~ ' ' ~
~ l~ \ ` i , . ~ ~ / ~ . ~ ' ' • ' S't
~ ~ r ~ ` ( ` /J ~ t rll• ~ • i~ ~1,~
- a * 't;~ ~ ~ , ` , - ( 1 ~ ~ ~l' f ~ ✓~'i
, '1 . • ~ , ~ t.t ~ , ,~r~ r
Is
; • ' ' + "
w i + 1 ~ , • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ •~~v ` ~ ,t,
\Is ~ ► ~ . _ ' i ~ . '1 • i ' ,d
if
'i
F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~'~-J~. ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ` • , , , t
'1' . \ t • ~ i'`' ~ ~ ~ ' ( ~ ~ ~ 1
1 "a`~ • ' 1 ~ ~1'\ ~ w~ ~y ~ i ~ ` 1 ( ` , ` t
~r 7
~ y ~ . ry t , 1 \ ~ ' . ' , . • - . 1 " , 0 t . ♦ j! ~ . It~ ~ t~'ti'
LP . ` ~A. ~.F
' ~ . r ' • ~ 1 , / ! 1 , ♦
/ l 0► , , ~1,~ y ~ ~ ~ fi ~ ~ ~ f t ~ t ° ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ i
` lr} ~ , , 1 t ~ •tt~. .o ~ ~ , , , , , , , ! ~ .
Is
` ' ~ ~ ~ Q , ~ , ♦ i,
'
~ • t
I ~ ~l 1 ~ ~ ~ + ` j~i
1(~
~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ ` i •t ~ ( G►,~T , . . , • ° (.1f 't,
t r
` , ' ~ t• i , ~ ' ► ~~~t~ 1
~ • i ~
. - ~ ~ ~ t •1 . 1 ! ~
M S ~ , ~ . ~ l ~ .
~ i ' p~.: ~ , ~ , ~ ' • ~ ~ ; ~ - r, '
~ 1 •~'s~~ 4 a
r • E ' ~ ; ~1 F' ~ . ~;e .
~ , ~ ` f • • ~~t , ,.~w j,
. . ~ j • a ~ ~ - ~ z 1 ' , r t
1 ~ • . ~ 1 , ~ l M . I ~ 1 ~ ~
' ' ~ ~ ~ ' t' „ ' ~ ~ ` ~ • ~ ' , , ~ ► ~ ~ ; ~ '
`Is '
~ , ` •
lk
i I ~ 1 ~ t i ~ 1 _ ` 1 , ,t ♦ ~ ° t ~
i • , ~ ~ , ' ; . ! ' ~
• ,1 ~ ,~I • , • ~ 1 ~
` ~ ~ ~ 1, ~ 1 ' \
` O ' ` • I ~ ♦ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i
~ ~ I . ; ' , , ~ 4 ~ , ~ .ti + ''1
~ ~ . 1 ~ r t I ` ~ ~ , , ~ I ~ ~ ~
• M • .
~ . ~
~ , t • ` • ~ ~ !
. ~ . . , ,
.
. . i • ~
~ . ~ ,
. • ~ ~ , i , ~ :
' Y , • ' y ` ./y`' f~
~ ~ ~ . . • • ~ • i i i
' • ~ tti~< < Z ~ , . _ ~930~ , Ar{
' ~ ~ • ~ _ ~ ~
` ' . ' . ' • • , • , ' , '>t ' ; . ~ . . . • , _ " . • . • ' . -
, . , , • ; t' • ' ~ ' ' ~ ~ ' , . , ~ . „ j,
y' • -
' ~~~1 ~ ' ' ~ ~ ' / , ~.~1 ~
.''....i~. : ~~.~.ti.~• ,j~s, ~ . . •,~i~~,t
. : • ~ ~ , 1 ' , r 1
, • • ~ i~~i:.. '.:1.'' ...t:...... , r . ,.~t
~ • ' ! ; • , . . . • . • • . , . l , , . ~ . . ~ ,f ~
, • t
; , Y ~ • : • , ~ ~ . . . , . ~ ~ " ~ , !
a N ;
. J ~ t .
~ ~
ADDrNnU►'t TO SUMMCFtFIEI,n EAST DMI1Vnk,E T'~i,PORm
nii alternat;e method ~o dispose of thc storm;aater runoff
comi ng f rom the above drai nage b4 s ir,s would be to eonstruc t
. a reterit? on pond at the N. E. bokindary of the proposed p1at.
'I'he pond x,rould be approximately 2 acres in surface area and
have a c?epth of fivc, ( 5) feet. '1'nc pand would have the
c;ipac:iAy U) .r(--rai.n th(• pG-ai% fl.ow of 132 c.fs and clipose of
it for i.ts duration.
The conatrur.tion oF this pond would involve grading the
tap soi.l Etway and ir.eorpcarating it 3-nto the dike caa].ls. The
computations are as follows using Spokane Co. Soil Survey
percolation ratc of 1.0"/hr_ in Garri.son Gravelly Sai.l.
2 acres (435E0 it2} 10 ft 1 hY = 20 cfs infiltratiosi rate
acre 12 hi; 3600 scc.
From graph:
Stozage required for Area IL - 204,000 ft3
Storage rEquirec3 fo- Area II - 112,000 ft3
Storae~e requi rec~ for Area 111 - 118,000 f t
434,000 ft 3
434,000 ft3 3 = 5.00 ft = depth of pond
2 zc. (43560 ft j
acre
For a storm of a gxEater frequency an ovn-rflaw structure
eould he construct`d to take thE flow aZozig Forker Roac3 to
the exxs tinca di tch and allowed to bypass the plat.
,L~_ .~t • • i - ~ - ~ - - - t- - -r-----~. . . I--- - . ~
Q_-4
l . - ! . . . . i . ~ . . . ~ ~r`_~-~
,
~ ~ . . ~
• . . _ _ _ ~ . . _ _ - _ - - ~ t~~^ . ' !r~_. _ ~ ~ m I '
- ~ ~ ~L_ ~ _r _ { _ - • -
~ I ~ ~ 1 - _ .
~ f 1 !n ~ " ' ' 1 ~ ,
. , . _ . . __.1 ~ _..o _ . ~ --r . ~ _-`•tCr~~E~.,_~~~~,,.?.~('~'~Y~;~r. ~~~~~.►t1
~ 0. ►>v,~
c,,A e C r%, r ~ • ~ P~.
• ~ ~ ~ i ~ i
~ ' .
c rr~ 45 en ~N,
- _ ~ - ~ - -l--• - r - , - ,_e.._... _ . --t- _ - - • _ . . _ j . . _ ~ - • - - - . . .
~ e ~ } I ~
; - - - - • • ~ . _ ~ _ . , °-t - - ` p- . . . . . i _ . . .
~ C
20 CT~
~ ~ ~ G ~ f ~ I _ ' • .
~ In
; •y
,
13'
~
;
_ < _ . . ~
J, .
Legal Description
Preliminary Plat Surrumerfield East
That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, T. 26 N., R. 44 E.W.M., in
the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying southeasterly of
Forker Road and southwesterly of the power line easement as recorded
on January 19, 1943, under Auditor's File No. 572309A;
ALSO the E 112 E 112 SW 1/4 of said section;
AND ALSO that portion of the W 112 of the E 112 of said section lying
southwesterly of said power line easement;
EXCEPT the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right-of-way;
AND EXCEPT commencing at the southwest corner of the southwest quarter
of the southeast quarter of said section; thence east along the south
line of said sec tion, a distance of 350 feet; thence north, a distance
of 933.42 feet; thence west a distance of 700 feet; thence south a
distance of 933.42 feet to the south line of said Section 35; thence
east along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 feet, to
the point of beginning;
AND EXCEPT Wellesley Avenue;
AND EXCEPT that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within
Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in
Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51.
e
INASHI o
~ O~
0~ ~
-
~
<<,
4ZD
F P ,os57 J
FCIsTEltEa
NqL LANO
C z ~z
~
~
RECElPT Date 19.7`$ 0 51%) 2
o ~
Received From
_ Address ;I~~-~
~
Dollars ~76`
~ F r~
~ ACCOUNT HOW PAID SpOK~JE COU;~ITY PLAN,1IidG DEPA:~:1•4~V€I'
AMT Of CASH
~ 4CCOUNt I I I
AMT PA1D I ~ I CHECK /I ~f Li v
~ BAIANCE MONEY (Z
` OUE ORDER ~ _ #
r /
SKSOQ iiedifl em
r PE°1246-78 ~ 2E-202-78. -hcaring to con5tder the appli on of WitlMaiii W. Main,
E 12720 Nora Av: -ue_,Spokane Wash i ngton , to f i l a p 1 at to be knavrn as
Surnnierfield Eost. Albo to consider changing the zoning map froiLi Agricultural
ta SlingVe-~ami ly Resideritial an the property described below, such zonc changQ
ta becoiire ef1~t;ctive only upon the filing of a final plat ar plats of such
property. The po`operty being platted is described as: 5ectian 35, Townshil) 26la,
Ranye 44 E.W. M. Thatport i on aF the tJW 114 of Sect ion 35, i n the County of
Spokane, 5tate of Wabk7inqtcxn, lying SEly of Forker Roaci anc1 SWIy of the pak-jer
1 i ne easenien t a s recorded on Janua ry 1 9, 1 9 4 3 , under Aud i tor ` 5 F i 1 e No. 572309A-
Also the E 112 of E 1/2 of SW 114 of said Section; and alsa that port+on of thc.
W 112 of the E 1 I2 of sa i d Sect i on 1 y w ng SWl y of sa i d power li ne easenierr t;
except the 5pokarie Valley Land & Water Company' s canal r i(jht-QF-:Vay; and
except comp►enc i n(j at the SW corner of the SW l l4 of the SE 1I4 of sai d sect ion ;
thence E a long the S 1 ine of said sect i on, a d istance of 350 feet; thence
N a d istance oF 933.42 fee t; thence W a di s tance of 700 f t; thence S a d i stance
of 933.42 feet to the S iine of said Section 35; thence E along the 5line of
said section, adistance of 350 feet to the point of beginning. And Except
Wellesley Avenue, and except that portiQn of the NW 114 of saicl sect-jon ly€ng
within Plat A, West Farnis Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recvrded in
Uolui7ie '`0'' of Pla t s, page 51. (Located in the Trentwood a rea of the 5pakane
Valley adjacenL to and north of Wellesley Avenue, west of Progress Road, south
of Forker Roari and east of Bannen Road).
AFi II?AViT OF POSTING
STATE OF V ASHINGTON }
} ss _
y COUNTY OF SPOKANr" }
.
~ `VrZ~~~a t~ ~being first duly sworn on oath#
deposes and says:
That Iam acttlzen of the United States of Arnerica, and a resident of the State of
- lvx'ashington over the age of 16 years,
That on the ~,d a y of c~~-Y ,~.9~~,, I persona 1l~r
po~ted ane ~1) Or rnvre true a Yd c~rrect~apie s of I ne hereto attached and tncorporated
herein by reference NCTICE F FUS~~~C HEARING :rx a coaspLcuous manner at each of
, the fo1towing locatians, to-wit:
r' '
y
; 14. _ ' c~~! ~ l ~
2 (1_:~ .,~i + ek, f 63
I ~ r f ~
~
DA3`ED fiHIS L-AY C IF 19 79 *
~ S IG N E
Q
' Subscr[bed and Sworn ta bcfore me thf s ~day ~f
~
t
Notary Pub 'tic in and for the Ska te of
R ECE IV EL)~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~SPOKANE COUNTY
~-~NNING DEPARTMENT
t# ~
ECEI~'T Date # .~~19
R!
~ ~~om ~
Address
c~a rs $r3
~;Z6 ~
%N
ACCC?l1NT Ht3++5f PAlb VOKA14L CoUzury I'L&M114~ DEPAR'TOLW
AM'E t]€ ~H I I
,~Lq .%CCdJUNi
AM7 RA13] C~{~CK
S11LANCE h'h€~hEf "l B
DIlE ~ ~ ~ C7R[1Ett ~ - ,
f
~~SO6
RECEIPT Date 19 7F
~ Received From '
~ AddresS
~
~ i Do ( f c+ rs
' ` ~
Fo ~ '''++~yyy
1
~ A~4.Ll4}I*rR P7►✓'R7 FA^1fY SPOYJM LOUi#Ti S1.AA.N1+liNLd LruY"#L:~i4'+f.i+}L+L
~ AM7 OF C~S~i
s~CCi~i.!l~hlT ~
aApt7. pJ►it? ~ C1ifCK
i ~ SA~~ LAN
MoNEY D ~ ORDE $t ~ t
i
~ or
I
~
4 ' K.fc r ~
~t'v~►l~ilv~ l,~uti ~ ~
PtA""1PJC DEPARTMEPIT
PRELIMINARY PLAT COIVFERENCE
CHECKLIST FOR I
U-vvo,to-,~e- CJ
Cif
THE FOLLOWING DOCUMIlVTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO ACCEPTAkICE BY THE PljAriNING
DEPARTMENT FOR HEARING BY THE PLANRING COMMI,SSION:
1. PLAT APPLICATION
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
3. ENGINEERS SECTION NIAPS (2)
4„ ASSESSOR5 SECTION NIA.P (1)
5. PRELIMINARY PLA.T MAPS (6)
6. ENVIRONMENTAL CF3ECKLIST
7. DEVELOPMENT PLANS
~A-
8. ~t
~
oTiER
9. comMEvTS :
This document must be return.ed to the Plat Ac3ministrator at the time
applicatian is made.
Plat Admini2;+rator
> -
Current Planriing A ini stratcyr
'
. . ,
f~
;
~ T
+ J .H
:?...rl'~ A.: =.:.7Cr1'~ Tui,,7 ~Oru~
asr ss Y* yas 1as sw •~yaiaai «y~i*a♦~ir1#t=~aa ay r ayi7y*ri*~~w»acr~ss=ssfis~r ss ~ssRil~iSaMlwt~~~~i* s! a:rss • r
R12 197&
:)a r-cmzed by a: piica.zt a.a:i survzyor
SPOKANE COUNTY
liREA A1iTi JS :(.k:iC7*srs+rss~asas~#**«t*s,W*r**sr~** asis*ta~csri*#Itl~~hl~s~~M~~~r~rt*~~y~atsss.sc
~ ~ • t1 r( j
.L'o 111-ar. amou=t o{ i a.zQ in th-ia Subdivision: 6r= y'J ~Acres Total Number of Lots ?61- ~
Proposed densi ty of the Plat: 3.1
Lots/Gress hc_•p
^otal amouat of adj oi.ning land coatrolled by thia owner or smcnsor :
Proposes Use of coatrolled adjoiaiag laad: Unknow;',
"
'What is the drijn_ng distance ia miles to the nearest fire station? _5 112 riiiies (-5ul.l ±
jhoPPin3 facilities? 5 mi lcs Mua;.ci^a'. Bc=3a.ry: P3•red a.~ ~c=
hi g~ivay - , _
T~ 11TT1
7* ii s rt s~ s s~ yr ~ f~ a s s~ R s s:~ s: s,a M w■ r s~ s~ Y s a s a~ r«~ r x s s s a•~• si a r~» s a s• s~ s s~ a s s s a a~ a. r♦ a a• s.
. M L I ~.J
~J
]_337.u 'u3E v_' ' E' ~l....i.. Sl:
.:Dualexes ( Indicate lots for dunlexes:
Multi-family dwelliag unita ( Y. Ind.icate wh:.ch lotti :
Mobi.ls Homes ( Other ( Describe other uses:
Describe any aon-residential use proposed in the Plat:
IZ-Ze-7`
What is th9 present use of the proZ t sed to be piat;,ed: 1a:_
List tgoe of uses : Cu?.tivated lanacr es. Pasture :
Timber: acres. Vacant: acreB. Other:
I3 keeping of aaimals desi..red? No C Yes ( xx Type
TS.*..:~.*..~*~..~~*..w~.....~.~*.........~~..*.**..~*~ .
_
:you p1aa to file the Plat in its entirety as prvposed, or wi11, it be amulti-phase deve-
vment? entire~v
~ wh,at level of i.mprovement wi11 streets be constructed? Gravel ( Min=mum.
Lrb and Gravel ( Curb and Paved C x). Paved only (
_.,scribe a,ny combinations of above :
.:.at is the time period exaected for caraplete developetent of the P?at: 19$:i
.:.lL.;'~'a`, _^n~. ••7an+~.~ ^ ~c.L ^ .~~a,:'? ~i ~'..y._ T,-_,...... ' , . . ^.w . -
2r . : ?
_ , ~ ~ J i. J ~ • -`I'... . __5 . . J~~~..;..:'J. i e ..3 ~ . tO SChOUl s1
t t~
..3 ~11':z13 e'a ~v :.C ~^.~.z t~~.:.~°~: ~ SCL1c3.L"°_ :eut
tg 4 • Estimated Sa1e Price $50a000 .
•t1 , ~ O:1 _:rLJ ^e _ or° `:.-y are SOZdi NO ~ ~ i • 7?S \ ! .
i9il1 3?°d ►°S ~C ~~.C.^r5 ti? ~a C:.:.~--'.1 in t:10 581° Of 1 G:s. 'iG
`
='.r:7.: t FJ
.r~`rTTj rr!~r~s:sr ~rrw*s ~«s~sssa~~ •s♦a*~r~w~yas+kltw~ •arwrsst•~rtasssaf*s~•si~■t~w~saaaaas•y~ •tx+s •
.L
-adicaia the .r-posed metaod oZ 3t.'wa3e c..ispesal: Septic ~a.::.K ~a~x,con ( ) ,
Treatmest plant ( Other, or combinati.eas (Lescr".be)
Zndicate '~~e rroposed source of water sumvly: Indi•ri.dual =Ub 1:'. _ 3~s ~em ` X ) .
Private community 6gstem
Iadicate method cf exteading serv-;.ce -"o t~, e ?ots (Dwellings) :
(Tndergrouad utility ea.aemeats C Overhead util,i-ty ea.sements C
U tilities in streets (x No ea.semeats C 10
incI" I ine ruris tiiru prc;,
indicate the distaace from this proposa?. to the neare -sv?:c s-4-Mgw-i-.e r Tai= : ! rQ
~d1 3~° n°~"°yr 'i=~:
~ X E i 3 I T A
PP.T.;Z1.~'Ir,U.RY ?LAT APIRLICATIOrl FOFsM : (-Oont-_^upd ) Fage ?
(t'.OIl:.I.^Ued) ss. .ss~*fawss:ssss**y**s■ss**»sssss.ssss*ss•~s~~•~sr•ar,.assa~:sMr~s«+~a:~
LiSt utii, i±Y .".7a~~1~.cZ~'VJ or IZi.Strivts J'x-jec.'f.eli vC, zro1TliXC to . J a~.a..l..
Electricitp: Mi1iP • Gae: l"Y'P Water: Trentwood Phone :
Irrigation I}istrict #3
n'~i1:~~~TY'.1~+L\a'i:.l~_S'~swsstas•ssisas~ssss*sss~i#s~cssaa~r~r~Y«a~:•.*Mr*w~♦s*s*s.~M.s.+•y:~sstrrssss~~as
'C~~'Jr.".u. PT..t~T NA.'IE.
. ~ ~;.P 'z-_C:eZ'Sr.gn- :e'.: , .:3Vp COm.:..@ t3t; tlle i^ O=av10II _ E.'QLi95t@d, aL217. -tl'1@ P: @r..`..:I1TI3Z",y :1.3-v :.3.7
been prepared by me ctader my supervisioa i.n accordsace with the requirements of the Spokane
Count epartment and the laws of tha State of Washiugtin,
O `
wAS >
y' O(Sl Qd )
~ ~ 6a Date : ;.c: . .
` (Address) E. 12720 Xior Av n►iP Phone : 922-1 tiO( !
~ o
5pokano ~ Wrishincton Z,-j: 00,1
~r~J►~ ~FC/S t~ RE~ , " _ . _
~-•f
L~~ . ;
.
I, the undersigaed, swear under the penalty of perjury ~Cl:iat_- ,L-c-vn
made truthi"ully and to the best of m9 knowledge. I also understa.nd that,, should tnere ~0-:
any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full d.isclosure on my part, Spokane Cot:
aay withdraw auy declsration of aonsigaificaace that it r -
checklist.
,z r - '
:.gned~ Daie: J~ul~ lj,
r. 12720 Nora Avenue ghone; 923-7346
,pokarte, lvashington Zip: 99216
Date : .1 unc 5, 1978
J
f~/ . - '~t..•~-",~- j i
. sa ~~~as xs~..re,i,.a~ ~ rws •s»asa~ne.sx#rwaxs ar=~:s ra~sarc,t:xsss asssas~:r ~~•a:wyua x~w.sasr+a~rsw:r~ aa*aw w
v3 r~ M ~l.i.f:~.. p -.nw...~7 v 1~, J~ rY -~.t~y ^..r. T1Jr. ,rPr or
r.~~ r~ V ~
A. ~:~.s su~~•T (;s) ti~) sit•.:ated :rithia our service arAa.
'rle are (able) ( ) and wiZ].ing to suaply this subdivision Ath adzq,,iaz~ '.Jater :c.
(lamestic) ( fr.re ) CjndU4t&is,11 { 'a15 uses.
Satisfactory arrangesnent (ha.ve )0&eAM=*et ) been made to serve this proposa?. .
..D. Sig~ature (only when items A, B& C are true and comvleted)
SuVb9iatPra executed agr:.u _vr.ts, oP ard` aorditions betweer:
~ ~i. , F• 1 / RL/ ~ ' '~~c-~'r:r,~sv ( ...L,.~_
purvegors name sigaature and tit1e date
tssssrs.•sss~w+~a*:~sax~rsrr.~ss.~+..ar.»raa~s~s*wssrs~ssssssssw~*ssae~~~s,~awsa~assM~ars..r...:.
Ps.rt 4=1 - to be ;.oazpleted by 3sal th Disteric t
A. nealth J' ,:1CtrY'6quirsments~ Yor preliminary p].ats have (have nat) oe~~::
~ ~ ~ l . ,
3. Si ture
i ~ f r
' ~a.ture and title ~tA
t~ s s t!+•~~ s ti a s~! f w! f i f fi y w a w; r yi t~ * i s~~! i~ f fi f ri~ i t f1 yc f~~:♦ s s w s s i~ A a~•~ ~c y a~ ■ c=~~ y rs w t~ z•~ r w: s w• s~ s+ x s
. ~
,
E XH I B i T A _
PIUMDUYARY PLAT APPLICATICK F'ORM
• (Contiaued) Page 3
~~~~t~~! ts*t~sisr~~w tf#**~#~*1~1~*~~~iy~s~if~rM~rii~MS~ii~sLS~rc#~~~*~Mi*~t*if 4a*M**SiM*~iMt*/Ml~#
Fart N- to be completed by County Engi.neers Office
A. County Eng-~~neers Office requirements for preliminary p.l.ats have ~ave ne~Dbeen
satisfied.
B. Si gnature
-L4%-~gnature and title date '
i~~sMSS*i~~lra{s##sit*~is~iRtsysli+MlS~ss~srsisiasta~~*sissss.fsi~s~ra~s~~~~~+~st~~M*~LSi~~+i+r1~#~Mt
Part V- to be completed by County IItilities Dept.
A. Couaty IItilities Department requirements for prelimi:ary lat have (have not) beea
satisfied. ~.~`1a a- •t~~ ~-~c- Cs ~ ~ ► cz~.~.c~•~ &L-L~ ~ pro H . Signature ,
/r1
`signature and title d.ate
~
ssasrs*~N#~fi~w~~~t*~*~~~Mr~~~~~~f~~r~*r~iMwit#s~i*s~*~i~t+0i~*s1~sti~ss~s*~~~is~ssslse~tsss~y~s~tsss•
This part to be completed by P'l.an*+inR DepartAent
P1arn1 r~z Derartmen -E: Infarma tion
Date 3ubmittad: Checked by:
~7 .d D
School Dist:ict: Pr'slim:.nary Plat Fee: ~
Existin8 Zoain Chec4slist Fee : l~• S~
Zone ChanSe Fil e No. : z L - 1-2 0 - ~ ~ 650) Dats Established : ~ - ~ L/ V
Number of Lots: ,Z ~0 8 Adverti9ed Zone Upgr3ding: Z.- ~
Flat File No.: Pe- 12,oG -79 , Location: Sectica .3S Township
Hgaring Date : Rarge'
~
Plat Name : S~11N/~1 ~~tf/E~ ~ ~lg5'T
1 - - -
/
~
I
, 1 J
~ - ~ . ~ - 6 ~ _ . .
~ ~
~
~ r ~ -
~
°
A~G~~ID~, J~nuary ~0, I~~9 ~ TEI~E~HpNE: 4~~b-12(l5 ~
~PQIi~IhIE C9~Ut~TY PLA~kV I NG 5U~0111 l5 { QN HEAR1 NG ~R~ NER COl~MI1TTEE
1'1ME. l~u~e~d~y, Ja~~a~ry 3U, l~7'9 S 8:3~ A.M. (lt~~~ I~o. b o~ Nb~rnir~~ Agen~l~~) P~AC~: Broadwa~+ ~ent~'e 6ui lding~ ~nd ~loc~r
~ ~I ~21 J~f f~~rs~r~ ~ ~pakan~
~REL I M I~VA~Y SU~~ I U I S I ~Dt~ ~41~1~ ZONE ~E~C LA'~S I~{ CA~' l ON
~I~ , . , .
PE-i2~~i-]8, 5Uh~MERFI~LD ~AST
~~-~[~2-]!!, I~~GRl~t1L1`URAL 70 SIN~~Ei~AMIL'~ ~ESIt~~fi~TIAL
a. L~cat ion: Lvc~t~d in ~he Trentwt~c~d ~re~ ~af the ~p~k~ne
~f~lle~t ~djacent tp ~n+d north ~f W~lle~ley
Avenue, we~t c~f ~ro~ress RQ~d, 5outh o~ Forker- R~~d ~rad e~~t v~ ~~nn~n R~~~.
b. Legal D~scr~pti~n, $~ctic~n 35, TvwnShi~ ~~Nr R~r~g~ E.4l,1~,
~hat partion of tF~e NW l~4 ~f ~ectian 35, ~r~
th~e Caunty af 5pokan~e ~ St~t~ ~f Wasl~ i ngtc~n ~ i y i ng ~E 1 y c~f ~orker ~o~d ~n~f 5Wiy af the ~a~wer li~~ ~~5ement a~ recvrd~d on J~nuary 19a 1~43~ t~nd~r Auditor''s
F i l e No. S~~~O~A; ,A~ t~e E 1,1~ of E l,l~ of S~W l!~ ~f ~a i d~~~t i ar~~ A~~ A1 so
that ~artit~n ~o~ the 1~ I/2 flf the E 1,1~ of ~~id See~~ivn lyi.ng ~1~1~ of Said p~rw~r
line ~a~~r~~nt, ~xc~pt ~he ~pokan~ l~alley Land ~ W~t~r C~mp~ny~~ c~~al rigf~taof-~w~y;
A~nd Ex~ept ~v~mr~7enc i ng ~t the SW tvrr~er v~ the Sw 1/~+ ~f the ~E 1~4 5a i d~~ct i~r~;
th~nce E al~r~~ th~ 5 line said ~e~tion, a dist~n~ce pf 35~ fee~~ thence ~I: a
distance 933.~+Z fee~; ~h~nce W a di_st~nc~ of 7QQ ft~ th~nc~ 5~ di5t~n~~ of ~.t..-
~33.~+2 fe~et to tl~e S 1 ine n~ Said Section 3~; ~henc~ ~ alorrg the S 7 ir~e c~~ ~,~id ~~ction, a d~st~n~.~ ~f ~5Q f~et, t~ the p~~nt c~f beginni:ng~ ~,nd ~.xc~~t ~lell~sley
~~renu~e, A~n~d Exce~t that parti~n af ~t~e NI~ 1/~+ af ~ai:d ~e+cti~n l~i~ng withi~
Pl~t l~~+, We~t Farni~ Irr~g~~~e~9 Tr~ct~ a~ p~r plat therev~ r~cc~rd~d in ]~Qlu~e :~4~~
aF Pl~ats, page 5~.
c. 5{~ansDrc William W. ~a~n
E i N+~r~ Avenue
5p~k~~e, wA, 9~21~ d. ~ur~reyvr: Mi 1 ton T. ~otf~
~ i2]2Q N~pra Aven~e
Spo~,an~, '~A. ~9216
Sit~ 5ize: gl acr~s
f. Numb~r o~ ~~8
g. Pro~osec~ ~.~ar~d U~e: ~i~ngle f~mi ly d~rei 1 ing~ h, Exis~ing ~~ning: Ac~ricul~ur~l
i, Pr~pos~d Zc~ning: Singl~~-~amily Residenti~l
j. ~J~ter ~~u~ce: Trentwr~o~d irrig,ati~n ~i~trict
k, SGhool Distr~ct; East Valley ~'~+61
I, M~th~d ~f S~~:age ~i~posalq I~ndivi.dual s~~t~c t~r,k~
~7. ~~~i ran~ratal I~p~~t: A t~~i~ ~f discus~iQn ~t this ~+earing m~y be
whe~her ar n~t th~s proposal ~ill have ~
~ignifi~ant a~wers~ ~nvironm~nt~l in~p~ct. An Er~vir~nm~~tal lrn~act St,~+v~~nt l~a~ bee~ pr~par~ed a:nd circul~ted for publ ic res~~r~se and c~rr~mera~5, A~~a~~+ ~f the
d~c~,~+ent i~ ~ availab]e for ~ubl~~ ir~sp~ctian at the ~pok~n~ ~~unty Public Li~rafy,
Ilalley Bran~h, E~~DD' ~1ai~, t~r at the 5~~kane Cc~~nty F1~nr~in~ Departm~nt~
Broadway C~ntre ~ui ldir~g, ~1 ]"~l Je~fers~n,
_
~4VER ~FO~ MAP~ .
FaRM eti_
~ ~ Y ~ a ur n+ -r ' r~ i ft r . ~l i r , ~ ~
, u, i y ~ " ~ i
' ~;3~i+~rtiv _ ~ , ~ , tl ~ ~ ~ ~ w~ ~
~
• ~ ' " ,
r
~ 6 w
F 7 ~P -2, 2
PE-1206-78, SUMMERFIELa EAST
~ decisian makers with information as ta whether or not a patentia1 SIGNFICANT
ADVERSE i mpact upon the phys i cal env ironment wi ll resul t from implementati on
of the propasal, thus result7ng in the need far an EIS. However, all
"extensions of time" and mast "change of conditions: are exempt f rom the
~ provi si vns of SEPA; check wi th the Plann3 ng Department staff if uncertaint,y
extists.
n. Applicant is requesting a Tlme Extension until February 1,, 1983.
. , -
. ~
[
- 5
_ fo~
, r
~
Pg-al ~D k?
~
X,
,.y
r7
1 "nooo
0 14 F-as # F-Q a L
•
~
-zk ~ ~ VClk~@~ vQ I
~ J r. 1-~ a g h i q~ 5~c
~O .~.'rChC?o i y' am
s
lrd
$ ~ d
_ ; r~ Ffel4~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ 'F ~ , 4 ~ ~
a
_,G►~.,AM,v, ~ , ~ • _ '~L ~ -
i . ~ - ~ - ~ o ~ ~
y k1~ t~. vi
~ r r.y e L t~ J 4 cc i r 1+a • r~" ' ~~,/S -
ri ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~'d ' . • y . i
t ~y
{~'7- } ~ • ~ ~ _ _ - a
~L ~ - ~~f~ ~ .w ~ •
_ _ _ + { ' + ` , ~ . • • ' 4 ~
p
L
' 1A
~
- - , J }
- ~,GENDA, January 28, 1982 - TEL£PHONE : 456-2245
SPO1CANE COUNTY PLANNINb SUBCIUISIOhi HEARIiVG EXAMINER CDMNIITTEE
TIME: ?hursday, January 2$, 1982 ~ 9:00 A.14.(Item fi1 on ~Eorr~lr~g Ager~da)
pLACE: BrQadway Centre 6uildi ng, 2nd Floar
N 721 Jefferson, SpQlcane, Washington
PRELZiMrNARY SUBDIVISION AND ZDNE RECLASSIFiCATIDN = ~XT€iVSYOPd OF TIME
PEy1206-78, SUh1MERFIELU EAST •
ZE-202-18, AGRICULTfJRAL TQ R-1
a. LocatTOn; L.ocated in the Treritwaod area of the
Spokane ValT ey adjacent to and nvr'th
, of We1 I esley Avenue, west of Progress Road, sorath of Fcrker Rbad
and east of Bannen Road.
' b. L.egal Description: Sect7on 35, Tawnship 26N, Range 44 ~IA~
That portlon of the NW 1/4 of Section
35', in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, l.yzng SEiy of
Farker Road and SWIY of the power 1ine easement as recarded on
; Jan€aary 19, 1943, under Audi tvr' s Fi I e No. 57Z309A; A1 so the
' E~~~ of E1/2 of S4d 1/4 of said Section; And also that por~~or,
of the W 1J2 0f th~ ~1/2 of said Section lying SWly of said
power li ne easement; Except the ~~okane Vai 1 ey Land & Water
I.ompan,y' s cana l right-ofrtwa,y; And except commencing at the SW
corner of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/ 4 0f sa id secti on ; thence east
along the south line of said section, a drtstance of 350 ft; thence
north a distance of 933.42 ft; thence west adistance of 700 ft;
thence sauth a distance of 933.42 ft.sto the south 1 ine of said
* Sectian 35; thence east alvng the south l ine of said secti on a
di stance of 350 ft. to the point of begi nning . And except
Wel lesl ey Avenue; And except that porti on of the NW 1/4 of said
section iying within Piat 7#14, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per
plat thereof recarded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51.
c. Sponsors: W.Main Corporation & TDG, Inc.
E 12720 Nora Avenue E 12929 Sprague Avenue
5pokane, WA. 99216 Spokane? WA, 99216
d. Engineer: I.P.E.C.
~ E 12720 Nora Avenue
5pokane, WA. 99216
- e. Site Size: 91 acres
f. Number of Lots; 266
g. Proposed Land Use: Sing1 efamz ly dwel1 i r,gs
h. Exi stzng Zon7rtg: Agr~ccal tural
i, Proposed Z o n i n g: R-1 j. ',iater 5ource: Trentwoad Ir~rigat7on District #3
k. 5chool Di strict: East Va1~ ey 10381 -
l. Method of Sewage ai sposal : Individual septictanfcs
M. Envirorimental Impact: A prvposed declarati on of nan-
significance (a preliminar,y decision,
which may be reversed, that an envirvnrnental impact statement, an
EIS, is not needed) has beer, administratzvely issued. Tnis in-
sures the applicant of a timeTy processing of his/her provosal at
the time of the publ ic hearing. BUT, arnajor purpose of the
publ7c hearing is to afford the opportunity to present the
i
f
~
t.~..,~ . . . . L-..M0MQ , RE C E 1 VED
CLC ASSOCIATES, INC. SPOKANE COUNTY
SPOKANE, WA • DENVER, CO
[~1`►'~~~~,+;~ C'iF Fl.A1VNlNG
TO: SPa-kcoe, CDU47 D► v,'S,'Vn o~ ~
, DATE: 3/'A
C3K, l ~•~d- P1~r~n"°~
/D 2, (o I,Ue9+ 6ro,gJ w~ / 90e- . SPOKANE PROJECT '?q1Q.0Y
5 pok4.ne-, t,VX q'7'1?b10
ATTENTION: PROJECT NAME: sl.c/ytnle-eie-Ij- E~
3-ohh PaJey-50,k/ 5ehiar P1ah/7c
Description ~
MI Xerox Prints Copy of Letter M~
Original Drawing M~ Contract Documents
~ Work Authorization M~ Report
M~
No. Copies Description
~ -pr~
Purpose
0 Information ~ Review & Comments M~ Per Your Request
MI Written Approval M ~ Signature & Return M~
Remarks
~ a o -74-
4JiP Or' °r D Lcjcl-
PleCZSe. Cy• ~e' e.uJ
ct n.A maf
"-r~
Signed:
cc:
707 W. 7th Ave., Suite 200, Spokane, WA 99204 (509) 458-6840 Fax: (509) 458-6844
~
FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT
1 ~
~
~
~
.J A► iV UA A Y 19 75
'
Loa"AD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY
il
I ,
FINAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
SUNSNIERFIELD EAST
Prepared for
William W. Main Investment Co.
and
T. D. C. Inc.
Lead Agency: Spokane County
January, 1979
INLAND PACIFIC ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CORP.
E. 12720 Nora
Spokane, Washington 99216
INTRODUCTION
' The proposed aetion under review is for a 268 lot residential preliminary plat
and zone reclassification From the Agricultural Zone to the Single Family
Residential Zone. Both the preliminary plat and zone reclassification
applications have been submitted to the Spokane County Planning Department for
public hearings.
The proposed action was initiated by William W. Main Investment Company and
T. D. C. Ine. The 91 acre site is located in the Spokane Valley, north of
Wellesley Avenue, west oP Sullivan Road and east of Evergreen Road.
The lead agency f'or this proposal is Spokane County, and the responsible
oPficial is Fred Dayharsh, Director of the Spokane County Planning Department,
N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington 99260; telephone (509) 456-2274.
The proposed action may require the following legal actions and permits:
(1) DraPt and Final Environmental Impact Statements;
(2) Zone reclassification approval;
(3) Preliminary and Fina.l Plat approval of Summerfield East;
(u) Approvals or permits from the Spokane County Health District, the
Wa9hington State Department of Social and Health Services and the
Washington State Department of Ecology for design and operation
of a sewage disposal sqstem; and
(5) The obtaining of all required building permits, inspections and
approvals.
The Draft Environmental Impact Statement was issued on October 31, 1978,
and the review and comment period ended on December 5, 1978.
The circulation of this document is prescribed in the SEPA Guidelines (WAC
197-10-600) which directs that the Final EIS must go to "the Department of
Ecology, Office of the Governor or the Governor's designee, the Ecological
Commission, agencies with jurisdiction, and federal agencies with
jurisdiction, whieh received the Draft EIS. The Final EIS may be obtained
from the Spokane County Planning Department for the cost of reproduction
and mailing.
This Final Environmental Impact Statement was prepared by Inland
Pacific Engineering and Construction Company under the supervision of the
, County of Spokane as the lead agency. The official date of issue of the
Final Environmental Impaet Statement is January 11, 1979•
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION i
LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES fii
LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS iv
DISTRIBUTION LIST v
SUN M Y OF THE CONTENTS OF THE DRAFT EIS vi
SUNMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES xvii
DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL 1
IMPACT ANALYSIS 6
LIST OF ELEMENTS OF THE IIdVIRONMENT 6
Elements of the Physical Environment 9
1. Earth 9
2. Air lu
3. Water 20
4. Flora 34
5. Fauna 36
6. Noise 37
Light and Glare 39
8. Land Use 39
9. Natural Resources 43
10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Emission 44
Elements of the Human Environment 45
1. Population 45
2. Econvmies 47
3. Housing 48
4. Transportation/Circulation 49
5. Public Services 52 '
6. Energy 58
7. Utilities 60
8. Human Health 63 ,
9. Aesthetics 63
10. Recreation 63
11. Arehaeological/Historical 64
12. Additional Population Characteristics 64
THE RELATIONSHIP BET'WEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USES OF
MAN'S ENVIRONMENT AND THE MAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT
OF LONG-TERM PRODUCTIVITY 65 '
IRREVERSIBLE AND/OR IRRETRIEVABLE
COMMITMENTS OF RESOURCES 66
AL'TERNATIVES TO THE PROPOSAL 67
FOOTNOTES 72
APPEAIDICES A 73
APPENDICES B 81
APPENDICES C 83
ADDENDUM FINAL EIS CONMENTS AND RESPONSES 86
ii
LIST OF MAPS AND FIGURES
Vicinity Map 3
Area Map 4
Site Plan 5
Soils Map 10
Topography Map 13
Aquifer Location and Seismic Profile 23
Aquifer Transmissivity Distribution 25
Water Sampling Location 27
Water Quality 30
Water Service Locations 33
Land Use Map 40
Zoning Map 42
Average Daily Traffic Count Map 50
iii
LIST OF TABLES AND CHARTS
Suspended Particulate Summary 15
1976 Carbon Monoxide Levels 17
Arithmetie Mean of 11208" Study Wells 28
208 Irvin Well Arithmetie Mean by Depth 29
Population Growth in the Spokane Area 45
Population Projection for Spokane County................... 46
Sehools Impacted by Project 55
Available Parks and Recreational Facilities 56
'
iv
~
DISTRZBUTION LIST
U. S. Environmental Proteetion Agency, Seattle
U. S. Soil Conservation Service, Spokane
Wash. State Department of Ecology, Olympia (2) (Note: 1 copy to SEPA Register)
Wash. State Ecological Commission Dept. of Ecology, Olympia
Wash. State Dept. of Ecology, Spokane
Wash. State Department of Fisheries, Olympia
Wash. State Department of Transportation, Olympia
Wash. State Department of Natural Resources, Colville
Wash. State Department of Natural Resources, Olympia
Wash. State Office of Programming, Planning, & Fiscal Management, Olympia
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority,
Spokane County Building Department,
Spokane County Engineering Department, (5)
Spokane County Park & Recreation Department,
Spokane County Planning Commission, (1)
Spokane County Planning Department (10)
Spokane County Prosecuting Attorney, Civil Division (2)
Spokane County Health District, Environmental Health Division (1)
Spokane County Conservation District
Spokane County Public Library (2)
Spokane Regional Planning Conference (2)
City of Spokane Public Library (1)
Washington Water Power Company
~ Spokane Valley Herald
East Valley High School
East Valley Junior High School
Trentwood Elementary School
East Valley School District No. 361
Trentwood Irrigation Distriet No. 3
'
v
'
'
'
SUMMARY OF THE CONTENTS OF THE DRAFT EIS
Purpose and Objectives
The sponsors visualize Summerfield East as a response to the rapid growth
the Spokane area is experiencing. It is the intent of the sponsors to
economically provide an environmentally planned residential development to
include a public water system, paved and curbed streets, storm drainage
facilities designed to meet the approval of the Spokane County Health
District, and underground utilities. It is anticipated that the project
will provide a full range of housing units which will include housing
opportunities for younger families with moderate incomes.
Proposal
The proposed project is a planned residential development of approximately
91 acres with 268 lots, which will require the approval of a preliminary '
plat and zone reclassification by the Spokane County Board of Commis-
sioners.
The site is located in the Spokane Valley, north of Wellesley Avenue, south
of the Forker Road - Progress Road intersection, and west of Progress Road.
The development is planned to be phased over a six-year period of time with
48 homes to be constructed in 1979 and with 44 units constructed each year
for a five-year period. Project phasing, however, will be subject to
market conditions. '
'
,
vi
'
Elements of the Physical Environment ,
1. Earth
Direct and Indirect Impacts
Disruption, displacement, compaction and overcovering of soil will occur, as
well as minimal alteration of topographical contours, which may result in ,
minor wind and water erosion during the construetion phase. Approximately
25 pereent of the site will consist of paving and structures.
,
Mitigating Measures
Containment of earth movement within roadway corridors and foundation
areas. Replacement of soils where disturbed. The design of streets and
homesites in harmony with local topography.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts '
Minor reconfiguration of approximately 25 percent of the site. Increased
erosion potential during the construction phase. '
2. Air
Direet and Indireet Impacts ,
Short term air quality degradation will result during the construction
phase, with increased suspended particulate and equipment carbon monoxide
emissions. Long term impacts will result from increased vehicular
emissions and from home heating units. Ambient increases are not to exceed
Federal levels. Future sewage collection systems may generate obnoxious ,
odors.
Mitigating Measures '
During construction, dust will be controlled by use of water; and phasing
will localize the source of suspended particulate emissions. Paving of
roadways and the enforcement of County air quality standards will mitigate ,
vehicular related emission increases. Public transportation should be
encouraged.
3. Water
Direct and Indirect Impacts
Surface water movement and runoff/absorption will be altered as a result of
impervious surfaces covering approximately 25 pereent of the site. The
project will not increase the hazard of flooding in the area; however,
existing flooding along Forker Road may impact the projeet.
vii
1
L
'
~ There are three sources that may impact ground water quality:
approximately 80,000 gallons of waste water per day, storm water runoff
and the use of chemicals (fertilizer, herbicides, ete.). Waste water
disposal may be considered the most significant source, but the quality of
the potential effluent reaching the aquifer from a subsurface drainfield
will be improved over the quality of the effluent diseharged to the
drainfield because of biochemical treatment mechanisms that occur as the
effluent passes through the soil column above the ground water. (Soil
column ranges in depth from 80 to 110 feet).
To try to quantify the impacts of this development to the aquifer quality
would be extremely difficult, if not futile. The "208" Water Quality
Management Program, being conducted by Spokane County in cooperation
with the U.S.G.S., U. S. Environmental Protection Ageney and the Washington
State Department of Ecology, have not to date provided any definite
conclusion regarding recharge of the aquifer by drainfield, storm water
effluent, or ehemical use over the aquifer. It is anticipated that in the
near future, the 11208" will have a Cause and Effect Report dealing with the
impaet of urbanization on the aquifer. Current data indicates the
edges of the aquifer show generally higher levels of pollutants than the
main body of the aquifer.
It is estimated that the project will result in the withdrawal of
approximately 532,000 gallons of water per day at peak flow (summertime
use). Trentwood Irrigation District will provide water for domestic use
and for required fire flow.
Mitigating Measures
A Spokane County Storm Water Management Plan would mitigate the drainage
problems caused by runoff in the Forker Road drainage basin. In addition,
two methods of controlling storm water from this basin are available to the
pro,ject sponsor and are identified in the Summerfield East Storm Drainage
Report (see Appendix A). Increases in runoff, a result of impervious
, surfaces, will be mitigated by the provision oF on-site disposal, with use
of drywells, curbs, gutters and appropriate street design.
1 Proper drainfield site seleetion, proper installation operation and
maintenance will mitigate the potential for ground water contamination. The
installation of dry-line sewers '-will allow for more flexible sewering
alternatives in the future which may mitigate the potential for ground
water contamination. The ground water impact could be mitigated by reducing
the density of the proposal. However, a lower density project may exclude
a number of sewer alternatives.
viii
~
~
'
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There is a possibility of drainfield effluent or surface water runoff
reaching the aquifer. The "208" Water Quality Management Program is being
conducted to determine the extent and magnitude of contamination.
The long term commitment of water from the aquifer to serve the ProJ'ect '
should be eonsidered unavoidable.
4. Flora
Direct and Indireet Impaets _
The ro '
pject will result in the permanent disruption of current prime
agricultural soils for road right-or-ways and homesites. The existing
flora will be replaced with lawns, shrubs, trees and backyard gardens.
'
Mitigating Measures
The permanent disruption of the current agricultural land may be mitigated
by the introduetion of lawns, shrubs, trees, flowers and baekyard gardens.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Permanent removal of agricultural crops on site.
5. Fauna
Direet and Indirect Impacts
'
A decrease in the number and/or diversity of wildlife that inhabit the area
will occur.
Mitigating Measures ,
The retention of as much natural vegetation as possible, as well as the
introduction of landscaping.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts '
The permanent removal and disruption of a portion of the wildlife habitat
is an unavoidable adverse impact.
ix \
~
'
6. Noise
Direct and Indirect Impacts
Increases in noise levels during the construction phase and during the
suburban residential period will occur. Noise will be generated from
' vehicle traffie and construction activities.
Mitigating Measures
The inerease in noise levels may be mitigated by limitation of construction
activities to normal working hours, by noise buffering provided by home
insulation and by the use of proper mufflers and vehicle-quieting devices.
Unavoidable Impaets
' The increased noise levels resulting from the eonstruction phase and from
the suburban residential period may be considered an unavoidable adverse
impact to some, but the increases will not exceed State and Federal
' standards.
7. Light and Glare
Direct and Indireet Impacts
Artificial light will be required for street lighting, interior and
exterior residential use, and for nighttime vehiele use.
Mitigating Measures
The use of low intensity street lighting, as well as generous use of
landscaping and careful planning when determining exact building
locations, will help to reduce the impacts of light and glare.
~
Unavoidable Adverse Impaets
, The project will result in increases in light and glare.
8. Land Use
Direct and Indirect Impacts
The project will result in a change in the land use of the site from a
vacant parcel used for agricultural purposes to a single family residental
development. The 91 acre site is proposed for a 268 lot subdivision,
(gross density of 2.9 lots per gross aere), a density that would be
compatible with the surrounding residential uses and compatible with the
"Generalized Comprehensive Plan, Spokane IMetropolitan Area."
x
i
Mitigating Measures
With the use of an Architectural Control Committee, restrietive covenants,
the application of controls available with planning, zoning and
subdivision regulations, and the establishment of an orderly pattern of
development and pro,ject phasing, adverse land use impact could be mitigated. '
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Those who desire to maintain the site in its present rural state may view
the proposed land use as an unavoidable adverse impact.
9. Natural Resources
Direct and Indirect Impaets
'
During the construction phase of the project, building materials will be
consumed; and during the suburban residential period, energy in the form of
fuels will be consumed. Prime agricultural soils on the site will be
devoted to residental land use.
Mitigating Measures
Conservation techniques during the construction phase and during the sub-
urban residential period may minimize the consumption of natural resources.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The project will consume natural resources during the construction phase
and during the residential period. In addition, the use of pure
agricultural soils for residential soils is unavoidable.
10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Emissions '
N/A
~
Elements of the Human Environment
1. Population
Direct and Indireet Impaets
Summerfield East will provide 268 lots for the same number of single-family
residential units, to be constructed over a six-year period of time.
Assuming the population multiplier of 3.5 persons per single family
dwelling, the completed project will provide housing for 938 persons.
Mitigating Measures
Careful planning and the development and implementation of land use
regulation can reduce population impacts.
xi
1
~
,
~
'
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
A population increase in this area may be considered by some as an
unavoidable and adverse impact.
~ 2. Housirg_
Direet and Indirect Impacts
Summerfield East will provide 268 lots for 268 single-family residential
units, with home selling prices ranging from $40,000 to $85,000.
Mitigating Measures
Project phasing will tend to ease the impaet along with careful planning
, and the implementation of land-use regulations.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Housing inereases in this area may be considered by some as an unavoidable
and adverse impact.
3• Economics
Direet and Indirect Impacts
The project will require expenditures for payrolls and Por the purehase of
materials, supplies and services, while the completed pro,ject will increase
the assessed taxable value of the site and the proposed improvements to
$169750,000.00 (1978)
Mitigating Measures
~
None
~ Unavoidable Adverse Impaets
None
, 4. Trans ortation/C'
P irculation
Direet and Indireet Impacts
The project will create an estimated 2,144 one-way vehicle trips per day.
The transportation and circulation pattern of the area should remain the
same even with the proposed increases. The existing primary and secondary
roads proposed to serve the site can handle the increased capacity.
xii
'
,
The projeet will include an extensive internal roadway system that will
integrate with the existing roadway network and will be curbed and paved.
The increase in traffie generated by the projeet will also inerease traffie
hazards.
,
Mitigating Measures
The development of public transportation, car pooling, the encouragement of
bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and street laYouts which discoura8e high I
speeds, with adequate traffic controls, such as stop signs, where needed,
will mitigate potential transportation hazards.
Unavoidable Adverse Impaets
Increased traffic volumes and hazards in the vicinity of the site are '
unavoidable adverse impacts.
5. Public Services
'
Direct and Indireet Impacts
Additional services will be required from many public agencies as a result
of the project, including Fire District No. 1, the Spokane County Sheriff's
Department and the Washington State Patrol, East Valley School District No.
361, park departments, maintenance agencies, health department, etc.
Mitigating Measures
The inereased demand for public services as a result of the project will be ,
mitigated by the increased property tax revenue generated by the project.
The impact on the schools will be mitigated by the expansion of facilities I
provided through special levies and tax dollars.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
~
This project will increase the demands for fire and police protection,
educational and reereational facilities, and for the maintenance of the
above mentioned and other governmental services. Delivery of these i
. services, at least initially, exceeds any offset due to increased tax
dollars.
6. EnerU Direct and Indirect Impacts
The project will require energy during the construction phase and it is
estimated that the development, when completed, will consume approxi.mately
10.9 million kilowatt hours of electricity per year and an estimated
xiii
'
!
1
' 134,000 therms per year of natural gas (based on heating needs of 25
percent of the projeet). Current energy sourees are adequate to serve the
project. Indirect increases in consumption of energy and fossil fuels can
' be expected.
Mitigating Measures
1 Energy conservation teehniques for home use will mitigate energy
consumption impacts.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The projeet will result in increased consumption of energy for heating,
cooking, lighting, general household use and transportation.
7. Utilities
' Direct and Indireet Impacts
The projeet will result in increased demands on communication
' service from the Pacifie Northwest Bell Telephone Company, energy from
Washington Water Power Company (see Energy, Section No. 6), water from
Trentwood Irrigation District, on-site sewage disposal and storm drainages,,
and solid waste from Valley Garbage Service.
Mitigating Measures
Close coordination between the project sponsor and the affected utilities
should mitigate potential impacts, as well as i.mplement an appropriate plan
by pertinent utilities.
' Approval of on-site sewage disposal and storm drainage sYstems bY the
appropriate State and County agencies.
, Unavoidable Adverse Impaets
The projeet will result in inereases in utility service.
1
8. Human Health
(Refer to Section 5"Other Governmental Services").
'
9. Aesthetics
N/A
10. Recreation
(Refer to Section 5"Parks and Other Recreational Facilities").
xiv
~
,
'
11. Archaeoloeical/Historical
Direet and Indirect Impaets
'
A slight possibility of the unearthing of archaeological finds on the site
exists.
Mitigating Measures
Contraetors can be made aware of potential archaeological finds, what to
look for, and what to do if something is found.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
'
Possible disturbance of subsurface archaeological resources.
12. Additional Population Characteristics '
N/A
~
'
'
'
xv
~
~
No Action Alternatives
~
, The site would remain in agricultural production, but because of the continued
growth in the East Valley area, no action today would most likely result in a
delay in the eventual development of the site.
Development Presentl.y Permitted
The site has the Agricultural Zone (A) classification, a land use
classification for an area suitable for farming and agricultural pursuits.
Development under this alternative eould result in similar if not more severe
adverse environmental i.mpacts than those identified for the proposed action.
Project Implementation in the Future
Could result in demands for a more intensive future development due to
increased costs.
Alternative Site
Project sponsors do not own a similar parcel of land with similar locational
advantages. If there was an alternate site available, the same environmental
elements, traffic, site development, air quality, water quality, noise, light,
glare, utilities and services, etc., would be impacted. (Less ground water
impact if site not located over aquifer.)
Alternative Densities
A lower density development would mitigate impacts on air, traffic, noise,
utiliies, public serviees, ete., but would result in higher per unit cost of
housing, utilities and services, and could reduce the number of sewage
alternatives.
A higher density development would increase the environmental impacts, but
would allow for less expensive housing, utilities and services; and allow for
more revenue to be used toward mitigation of the adverse impacts.
~
Sewage Alternatives
~ Septie Tank - Drainfield - will function with minimum maintenance, does not
centrally collect effluent, does not provide flexibility for future sewer
alternatives, allows for individual home owner maintenance and operation,
and may have an impact on ground water.
Central Collection Treatment - provides a minimum of primary and secondary
treatment of effluent, eliminates the need for individual home owners to
operate and maintain a separate system, thus assuring better maintenance,
and may have an impaet on ground water.
xvi
~
,
SUNiMARY OF IMPACTS AND MITIGATING MEASURES
IMPACTS MITIGATING MEASURES
l. Soil - Disruption, dis- 1. Returning affected soils to
placement, compaetion, original condition; the con-
undercovering and over- tainment of earth movement ,
covering of soils. within a specific area.
2. Toeo ra h~ - Minimal 2. Design of streets and lots in
alternations in topography. harmony with existing
topography.
3. Erosion - Wind and water 3. Use of water to hold down dirt
erosion. during construetion. Paving ~
and landscaping will reduce
wind and water erosion.
4. Air - Dust during con- 4. The use of water sprays and
struction phase and dust pollutives during con-
carbon monoxide level struction. Construction under ~
increases from automobiles. the authority of SCAPCA;
paving of all roads; and the
implementation of Federal Auto ,
Emission Control Standards.
5. Odor - Paving activities 5. Proper operation and maintenanee ,
during construction. Future of sewage disposal systems,
sewer alternatives may gen- Implementation of Federal Auto
erate odors: Typical vehicle Emission Control Standards.
exhaust odors.
6. Water - Increased surface 6 ~
. Provision for drywells will
water runoff. compensate for on-site runoff.
7. Floods - Existing Forker 7. (a) Spokane County Storm Manage-
Road flooding may impact ment Plan
pro,ject. (b) Storm Drainage Facility as
described in Appendix A of
the DEIS
xvii
I
i IMPACTS MITIGATING MEASURES
8. Ground Water Quality - Peak 8. Use of low water using fixtures
~ water useage oF 665,000 and appliances.
gallons per day.
9. Ground Water Quantity - Waste 9. Installation of dryline sewers;/-
water collection treatment, sediment basins within drywelli.
disposal facilities, and
storm-water drainage systems
will impact ground water.
10. Publie Water Supplies - Peak 10. Use of low water using fixtures
water useage of 665,000 gal- and appliances.
lons per day.
,
11. Flora - Numbers or Diversit.y 11. Landscaping; introduction of
of Species - Permanent dis- similar cropland elsewhere.
ruption of the agricultural use of the site.
12. Agricultural Crops - Perma- 12. Baek-yard gardens; introduction
nent disruption of the of similar cropland elsewhere.
agricultural uses of the
, site.
13. Fauna - Numbers or Diversit.y 13. Retention of as much natural
of Species - Permanent vegetation as possible; land-
disruption of a majority of scaping and plantings.
existing animal habitat.
14. Noise - Noise impacts related lu. Limitation of construction
t construction, vehicular activities from 7:00 a.m. to
traffic eneral human activ- b•.00 v
, g p.m.; noise buffering
ity and minor meehanical by insulated walls; properly
~ noise. operating mufflers, shutting
off idling equipment.
15. Light and Glare - Street 15. Use of low intensity street
lighting; auto lights. lighting, generous use of
landscaping, adjustment of lot
lines at T interseetions.
xviii
IMPACTS MITIGATING MEASURES .
16. Land Use - Change in land use 16. Establishment of an orderly
from agricultural to residen- pattern of development and
tial. project phasing; an Architec-
tural Control Committee and
restrictive covenants; Land
Use Controls and Planning Com-
mission Review.
17. Natural Resources - Perma- 17. Use of a variety of energy and
nent disruption of agricul- and other conservation techniques. ~
tural use, natural resources
consumed during construction
and energy after construction. '
18. Population - On site increase 18. Careful land use planning and
of 938 people. effective implementation of
policies and regulations.
19. Housing - An addition of 19. Projeet phasing.
268 single-family dwellings.
20. Transportation/Circulation - 20. Transit, carpooling, pedestrian
Vehicular Transportation access to schools.
An additional 2,144 one-way ~
vehiele trips per day.
~
21. Transportation S.ystems - 21. Transit, carpooling, pedestrian
Several hundred trips per access to schools.
day to Wellesley Avenue, ~
Sullivan Road, Trent Ave.,
I-90, etc.
~
22. Movement/Circulation of 22. Transit, carpooling, pedestrian
People or Goods - Increase aceess to sehools.
in activity.
23. Traffic Hazards - An ad- 23. Good design in street layouts,
ditional 2,144 one-way proper signing, provision for
vehicle trz'ps per day. sidewalks along arterials, ade- ~
quate accesses to arterials and
separate access to the elementary
school.
xix
IMPACTS MITIGATING MEASURES
24. Public Services, 24. Use of non-combustible mater-
Fire - 266 new residences ials, use of smoke detection
will require the fire devices, water mains and hy-
protection services of drant extensions, compliance
Fire District No. 1 with fire codes and zoning
setbacks.
25. Police - Inerease in service 25. Lighting, structure design,
requirement of law enforee- adequate access, and readable
ment agencies. addresses. ~
26. Schools - Additional sehool 26. Proper planning, temporary
age children; 268 elementary elassrooms and additional
students, 134 junior high tax base.
students, and 134 high school
students. .
27. Parks and Recreation - 27. School site play equipment,
Increased usage of area and additional tax base.
parks and facilities.
28. Maintenance - Addition of 28. Tax revenues and monthly
2.8 miles of roads, water, service charges.
power, and phone lines.
29. Other Governmental Services,- 29. Use of cluster mailboxes and
Extension of potential ser- additional tax revenues.
vice as well as other govern-
' ment services.
1 30. EnerEy - Use of energy during 30. Adequate insulation in roof,
construction, and onee the walls, and ceilings to reduce
project is completed heat transmission.
Use of high performance fur-
naces that can recover waste
heat from flue gas or those
with a flue shut-off.
Use of heat retaining fire-
places or wood stoves.
Use of high-performance air-
conditioning units (if ab-
solutely necessary for climate
control) with open-air cycles. •
xx ,
,
IMPACTS MITIGATING MEASURES
30. Energy (continued) 30. Provision of storm windows
and storm doors.
Provision of windows that can
be opened and closed.
Use of tinted glass in windows.
Double-glass windows.
Use of landscaping on the south
and west sides of the build-
ings.
Provisions for screens, shades,
and curtains.
Well-ventilated attics.
Use of dark-colored roofs.
Use of floureseent rather than
incandescent lights.
'
~
xxi
,
'
ADDENDUM
FINAL EIS
CONMENTS AND RESPONSES
' The followin -
g pages contain the comments received on the Summerfield
East Draft Environmental Impact Statement. The written comments
are reproduced in their actual form in which they were received
on the left side of the page, and the Spokane County responses on
the right side of the page.
'
'
,
86
STATE OF WASHINGTON
comwl",ow
BERT L. CO
a. A 61sMncx
WYlRYl30R
sox 190
Colville, Wa 99114
Nov 7, 197$
.
;
Spokane County Planning Cotranisssion
N. 721 Jefferson ~
L - Broadway Centre Building 1.
•
Spokane, Wa 99260 IN
• .
: Attn: Fred Deyharsh
NARBOR
• AAEA t
.
RE: Environmental Impact Statement of Summerfield East.
Dear Mr. Deyharsh :
s~,1,'•,~' •
I have reviewed the draft Environmental Impact Statement for the
above mentioned subdivision and feel that the Department of Natural
Resources ha9 no quest ions or comments on any part of thi a development,
as it does not lie in our fire protection area or adjacent to any
"lands managed by the Department of Natural Resources.
If I can be of further assistance please contact me.
Sincerely
~ .
.
BERT L. COLE
Commrssioner of Publ ic Iands
• - ~~~«.C~ -~.~~L~..~-~~
+ Wal t Wrvb 1 e -_Z•'Y:4' gpokane Local Manager ,
,r-S
Northeast Area
WW :bl
cc: Philip Hildebrand, Area Manager
Bill Boyes, Operations Forester
Ross Hesseltine, Arcadia District Manager
87
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER
' 1. N o response required.
'
,
88
-.1. r ` -
C1TY OF SPOKANE. WASHINGTON
CITY PLAN COMMISSION '
7NE 309 Cft y Hall
RICHARD H BARRETT, President
sVAUGHN P CAI.L, A 1 P.
bc= Manaper - Planninp
GG, A 1 P
ALl-AMERI
CACITY E Pl TannCiLn~Epirector
11111112 November 13, 1978
Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson 2.
Spokane, Washington 99260 ,
Attention : Fred Dayharsh, Spokane County
Planning Director
Dear Mr. Dayharsh: '
Subject: EIS Summerfield East
I have reviewed the above EIS and as always have a concern
with the effects of development over the Spokane Aquifer. This
development and more like it are eventually going to have some
effect on this valuable water resource. Due to the extensive
studies of the aquifer most recently being completed through the
"208" Program and the Department of Ecology and Environmental
Protection Agencies involvement, I would support recommendation '
by these agencies on mitigating measures to protect this water
resource.
. '
Sincer ly, ,
~ E. Terry Cleg
Planning Direc or
ETC : GOZ : vj d •
,
ECE
V E
N OV ~ 019i8
1
SPOKANE ~~UN ~ENT.
PLAN~~N~ ~EpARj
89
'
2. This comment is noted.
,
90
~ _L
` SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT '
Inter-Office Comnunication
Ddte: November 20, 1978
T0: Spokane County Planning Department
. Eugene C. Pr~% a`th~:, R.S.
FROM.
SUBJECT: Draft Environmental Zmpact Statement - SUMMERFIELD EAST, October 1978
The following changes or additions are recorcmended in subject document for the
reasons indicated.
1. Paqe viii - Amend first sentence to read: "***approximately 80,000 to 3.
93,800 qallons of domestic wastewater*+*".
2. Page 15 - Amend first line to read mean Total Suspended Particulates
(TSP) levels***". Reason: Advise reader of ineaninq of "TSP". 4•
'
3. Page 16 - At end of second paraqraph of section "Carbon monoxide" add:
"The Valley Chamber of Coaaaerce monitorinq site is perhaps most relative to 5.
Summerfield East project." Reason: Without a map shawing the location of
sampling sites, there is no correlation between the text and the table on
page 17. The relationship of air quality problems in downtown Spokane and
the project site is not made readily apparent.
4. Page 21 - In Section 3.3"Floods", clarify legal responsi.bility of Spokane
County for the maintenance of the old canal for drainaqe purposes. Reason: 6.
The refurbishing and use of the canal by the County appears paramount in
the drainage plan.
5. Page 31 - In first sentence, substitute word impacted for comvacted. ,
Reason: Accuracy.
6. Page 31 - Second paragraph - Amend to read "*"approximately 50,000 to '
93,800 gallons of domestic wastewater per day, Reason: See comment S•
1 above.
7. Page 32 - Zn paragraph c, add: "The drainage plan should be devised to '
pexmit collection and treatment before subsurface disposal as may be 9.
required by the forthcomfng wastewater management plan resulting from the
"208" Study". Reason: Groundwater quality is impacted by the total of ~
man's activities. Storm water runoff from developed areas contributes to
the total pollution as well as subsurface disposal of domestic waste
effluents.
8. Page 39 - In section 7c, add: "Covenants for the plat could require individual
lot exterior lighting to be limited to individual lot boundaries or not
exceed light sources of greater than 40 watts." Reason: Provides a major 10.
control on nuisance glare.
91
SCHU-ADh4-11 f3 '
3. The first sentence on page viii should read:
There are three sources that may impaet ground water quality:
Approximatel.y 80,000 to 93,800 gallons of domestie wastewater
per day, storm water runoff and the use of chemicals (fertilizer,
herbicides, etc.).
4. "TSP" refered to on the fourth line on page 15 should read:
..annual geometric mean Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) levels
not to exeeed 75 microgra.ms per....
5. The statement, "The Valley Chamber of Commerce monitoring site is
perhaps most relative to the Summerfield East Projeet", should be
placed at the end of the second paragraph of section "Carbon Monoxide"
found on page 16.
'
6. In Section 3.3 "Floods" of the DEIS there is reference made to a now
' defunet irrigation canal along the north edge of the project. In its
present state of repair, the canal is inadequate to handle peak spring
runoff and as a result some washing oceurs across Forker Road below
the Miller house.
The Spokane Land and Water Company construeted and maintained the canal.
The canal has since been vacated, with title reverting to adjacent pro-
perty owners. The legal responsibility for the maintenance of the canal
drainage purposes is legal question. The canal has been deeded to the
adjacent property owners who have claimed sovereignty over the canal
~ property, but for the past seven years Spokane County has used the canal
for drainage. Spokane County Utility Department representatives have
indicated that the County does not maintain and does not have the re-
, sponsibility For maintenance of the canal.
Please refer to comment 26 for the Spokane County Utility Department's
discussion of Drainage.
'
7. This typographical error is noted.
92
'
8. The third sentence in the second paragraph on page 31 should read:
It is estimated that the resident9 of the proposed project will
generate approximately 80,000 to 93,800 gallons of domestic waste-
water per day, which would be disposed of by the drainfields and
ultimately pereolated into the soil.
'
9. The statement, "The drainage plan should be devised to permit
collection and treatment before subsurface disposal as ma,y be
required b.y the forthcoming wastewater management plan resultini
from the 11208 Stud,y", should be added to paragraph 2 of seetion
3.6 C. on page 32.
,
10. The statement nCovenants for the plat could require individual lot
exterior lighting to be limited to individual lot boundaries or not
exceed lieht sources of greater than 40 watts", should be added to '
paragraph 1 of section 7 C. on page 39.
'
'
93
,
i
SUMMERFIELD EAST
November 20, 1978
Page 2 '
9. Page 63 - It is essential that status of the drainage system be clarified; '
if not resolved, f looding could adversely affect the use of septic tanks 11.
and drainfields in the plat. Reason: See also conmtent 4 above.
10. Page 69. Amend last paraqraph to read "***contaminants associated with
man's activities are reachinq***". Reason: Accuracy; septic tank- 12•
effluent is included in "man'8 activities", but no evidence is available
indicating a qreater percentaqe of septic tank effluent reaches the ~
ground water than from a vommunity treatment facility with subsurface
disposal. See discussion on pages 70 and 71.
11. Paqe 74 - Zn first paraqraph the stated 86 acres and 266 lots is incon-
sistent with earlier plat descriptions. See also paragraph 2 of calculations. 13.
Reason: See page 1, paragraph E.
~
12. Page 75 - For the personal pronoun "I" aubstitute the name of the author
or alternatively on page 75 shaw author's name and signature. The report 14.
should also be dated. Reason: Aesist reader in detezmininq credibility '
of the report since no individual authors are named nor is source of report
given.
_ ,
13. Page 79 Zn last paragraph, identify the plat map referenced, since the
map on page S is labelled as "Site Plan". Reason: There frequently are 15.
more than one plat map durinq planning atages of a project such as this.
,
sl
'
'
R '
E C E I V E
Nov : o 11g7a
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLA1iHING DEPARTMENT
~
94
'
'
The drainage area north of the plat has overflowed the irrigation
canal and created flooding over Forker Road and along the boundary
of the proposed project site during high runoff periods of the year.
Because of this and because no storm water management plan for this
basin is anticipated in the near future, an on-site storm drainage
facility alternative was included in Appendix A on pages 73-80 of the
DEIS, to insure the safety of the proposed project (septie tanks)
and adjacent area.
12. The last paragraph on page 69 should read:
The most recent "208 Study" findings strongly suggest that con-
' taminants associated with man's activities are reaching the ground
water and that concentrations of these contaminants are generally
highest around the periphery of the aquifer.
13. The first paragraph of the"Storm Drainage Report Summerfield East"
on page 74 should read:
The proposed subdivision would plat 91 acres of cultivated farmland
into approximately 268 lots (typical lot size 10,000 square feet.)
14. The "Storm Drainage Report Summerfield East" was prepared under
supervision of Richard L. Mason, P. E.
15. The last paragraph on page 79 should read:
~
As shown on the plat map on file with the Spokane County Planning
Department as Preliminary Subdivision Number PE 1206-78 and Zone
~ Reclassification ZE 202-78, there are a few things that can be
done to help insure the safety of the proposed project site.
1
95
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
J a ` ~ E O S T q T F R E G I O N X
s ,
1200 SIXTH AVENUE
J5 SEATTIE, WASHINGTON 98101
O Q
Z~~~r G~`O=
C
REPIY TO E I V
ATTN Of M/S 443 E
NOV 1 7 1978 /V U v u
Fred Dayharsh, Di rector SppKANE j
Spokane County P1 anni iig Department PLANNlNG pEpOUP~TY
N. 221 Jefferson ARTMENT
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Mr. Dayharsh: 16.
We have completed our review of your draft environmental impact statement ,
for Summerfield East, a residential development in Spokane, Washington
and would like to submit the following comments for your consideration.
Page 33 indicates that there is a water well 300 feet north of Wellesley
Avenue; however the EIS text does not state the use (domestic or irrigation)
of this water. The final EIS should indicate the use of the water and
whether or not other nearby wells are used as a source of domestic water.
If the Wellesley water is used as a source of domestic water, we believe
that periodic water quality analysis should be performed to determine if
surface runoff water and septic tank effluent from the surrounding homes ,
are degrading the ground water. The final EIS should present a plan to
determine if 7ocal ground water is being degraded after home construction
has occurred and a mitigation plan should the above plan indicate that ~
ground water quality is being adversely affected.
The EIS's discussion of ground water quality presents ground water charac-
teristics for several wells within a mile of the proposed development but '
does not present such characteristics for the Wellesley Avenue well whose
quality is stated as "excellent." The final EIS should present the water
quality characteristics of the Wellesley water as it should be representa- ,
tive of the water under the proposed development. The characteristics
should then be compared to the applicable drinking water quality standards.
~
We appreciate the opportunity to review this draft environmental impact
statement. Please do not hesitate to contact me or Dennis Ossenkop, of rry
staff, should you have questions or desire further information regarding
our comments. We can be reached at (206) 442-1285.
Si ncerely,
lk~ p~,~, J'~Cli~►,~~ ;
Alexandra B. Smith, Chief
Environmental Evaluation Branch 1
96
'
16. The well, as indicated on the Water Service Location Map on
~ page 33, has been capped and abandoned for 20 years.
The water well closest to the development is owned by the Trentwood
Irrigation District and is located on the northwest corner of Progress
and Wellesley as refereneed on page 32, and shown on page 40 of the
DEIS. The well is not currently used S►ear-round as demands can be met
by the two other wells within the Trentwood Irrigation District. (The
Trentwood-Mayhew well and the Trentwood-Progress well shown on page 27
. of the DEIS.) This well, when in use, provides water both for
irrigation and domestic purposes, and has not been known to be
' sampled. The Trentwood-Progress and Trentwood-Mayhew wells, however,
have been extensively monitored and all are part of the same water
system. The data included within the DEIS on these two Trentwood
~ wells would be very indicative of the water quality at the Wellesley
and Progress well and the ground water under the site. The Trentwood
Irrigation District System is periodically monitored to determine
~ water quality and its relation to applicable drinking water standards.
The Kaiser East Gate well is used for domestic water and one 11208"
Irvin well is a test well (depth selective.)
The 11208" Study has conducted an extensive study to try to determine if
ground water is affected by surface water runoff and septic tank
effluent.
'
In the Draft Summary Report of 11208" Water Quality Results And Cause
And Effect Relationship For Water Quality In The Spokane Aquifer it
was concluded that "moisture from precipitation as well as irrigation,
runoff, waste disposal and other sourees percolates from the ground
surface to the aquifer and carries with it salts and other
constituents." The study also recommends that correetive or
mitigative measures for runoff and percolation initiated to hold pol-
lutant load to the aquifer at or below its present level to prevent
future aquifer water quality deterioration. It is not known at this
time what mitigative plan would be utilized. It is know-n that permits
will have to be obtained and appropriate mitigative plans will have
to be approved by the agencies which release these permits. The
, proposal does offer flexibility for a number of waste water, and
runoff disposal options which are discussed in the DEIS.
~
97
I
'
Tk pi -
rf tSTATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION KT-01
WASHINGTON ~
Highway Adnurustrahon BuMing, Ulympia, Washington 98504 206/753600.5
i.
, Dixy Lee Ray
GovernoT November 22, 1978
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane Col.ulty Planning Department
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
17.
Spokane County
S~umnerfield East
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
~
We have reviewed the subject docunent and have the following comuaents:
We asstuae that the 2,100 plus trips generated daily by the development
_ will be routed on SR 290. At present it appears that the intersections ~
of SR 290 and Pines Roa.d and Argonne Road will a.dequately handle the
traffic. However, closer to the city the intersections are almost to
capacity, therefore a slight increase in traffic voluune will impact these
intersections. Also, the construction of the Hamilton Street Bridge will
attract an additional traffic load to SR 290. With these facts in mind,
we feel the statement on page 51 about all roads having arrple capacity
is misleading and should be corrected to address irrpacts to specific
intersections.
If you have any questions about these comnents, please call me at
753-3811.
Sincerely,
ROBIItT S. NIELSFN
Assistant Secretary ~
Public TrwisNrtation and Planning
~
By: WM. P. ALBQHN
Fnvironmntal Planner
RSN:tml WPA/WBH
Cot
cc: W. R. Horning ~
HB . Ashford R. Albert N
Enviroruaental Section ~ V 2 ?
P Sp0 19
IANNINANE cD
~ ~Ep,quNrY
T MENT
98
a►~ 3
1
As previously stated on page 51 of the DEIS, "the proposal will add
several hundred trips per day to Wellesley Avenue, Sullivan Road,
Pines Road, Trent Avenue, I-90." The assumption that 2,100 plus
one-way vehicle trips generated daily by the development will be
routed on SR-290 Trent Avenue for destinations closer to the city,
does not take into consideration the following data: .
, (a) The S okane Industrial Park the area's lar est manuf
P , g acturing
facility which encompasses 570 acres for approximately 75
employees, is located one mile southeast of the site.
(b) The Board of County Commissioners for Spokane County have
recently approved the zoning for a site located approximately
six miles southeast of the residential development in question.
This planned community will generate in the neighborhood of 10,000
jobs when completed and for its employment base, it includes a
~ 21-acre shopping center and a420-acre industrial trade center.
(c) Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation has a fabricating plant
which employees 2,678 workers and is located one mile south of
the proposed residential development.
(d) The Spokane County Planning Commission has recently approved
zoning for an 850,000 square foot Regional Shopping Center
proposed for a site located three miles southeast oF the
residential development in question.
~ (e) The travel time from the site to the Spokane central business
distriet by auto, aecording to the Spokane Metropolitan Area
Transportation Study, is 16 to 20 minutes. The Study, however,
' identifies I-90 as the fastest route to the city from Pines
Road (SR-27) when compared to Trent Avenue (SR-290).
Of the 2,100 plus one-way vehicle trips generated daily by the
development, it is safe to assume that a majority of the traffic
routed closer to the city will utilize I-90 via Sullivan Road and
~ Pines Road, thus increasing the traffic volumes at the Sullivan Road
and Trent Avenue and the Pines Road and Trent Avenue intersections.
According to the representative of the Washington State Department of
' Transportation, both of the above mentioned intersections have a
volume to capacity ratio of less than .50, which will allow for
anticipated increases.
It is also safe to assume that with a substantial employment and
service base within the vicinity of the proposed development as
described above, a substantial percentage of the vehiele trips
` generated daily by the development will be for destinations in the
area.
99
A R POLLUT ON CONTROI AUTNOR TY
POKANE
^ -
OUMTY
~
November 30, 1978
Fred Dayharsh
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99201
Dea r Mr. Dayha rs h:
1
After reviewing the draft Envi ronmental Impact Statement
for the Summerfield East Development, we wish to clarify
two items.
Fi rst, on Page 18 i t i s stated "al l. roads shoul d be paved".
Wi 11 be paved i s more proper as the County requi res paving 18.
on all new plats. '
Second, the continuing development in that area may be
expected to cause CO problems along Sullivan Road. We would 19. ~
1 ike the proponent to speak to this matter.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this draft
Envi ronmental Impact Statement. ,
Sincerely,
~
SAAA MA"ro"~
Bill Murphy ~
Air Quality Engineer
L
R E C E I V E
100 NOV 3 0 1978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ADDRESS REPLY TO: SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY '
W EST 1101 CCL! EGE, ROOM 234 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201
'
18. The second paragraph of 2.1 C on page 18 should read:
To reduce motor vehicle related emissions, all roads will be
paved, and the Federal Automobile Emission Control Standards
should be implemented.
19. It is reasonable to assume that owners of undeveloped properities to
the north, east and west of the site will continue to experience
pressure for the residential development of their properties.
With the increase in residential development in this area, it is safe
to assume that several thousand trips per day will be added to Sullivan
Road; thus increasing the CO levels. (Note Comment No. 17 regarding
vehicle trips generated by the development.)
Major commercial and industrial developments proposed for the
I-90/Sullivan Road vicinity however, will have a far greater impact
on Sullivan Road in terms of traffic and air quality as compared to the
projected residential growth discussed above.
Without specifics as to the nature of future development in the area,
it is impossible to quantify future ambient air-quality problems
along Sullivan Road.
i
101
. v
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
SOIL CONSERVAT(ON SERVICE
Room 360 U.S. Courthouse, Spokane, Washington 99201
. November 30, 1978
Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Department
N. 721 Jefferson 20.
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
_ We have reviewed the draft environmental impact statement for the
proposed Summerfield East develbpment and have the following comments.
It is the policy of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Soil
Conservation Service to promote the retention of prime agricultural
lands as one way to insure an adequate food supply for future generations.
We, therefore, are concerned that the statement should recognize this
relationship (in the section under short-term versus long-term productivity)
in the light of the overall incremental loss of prime soils in the County
due to all similar development proposals. If this is not done, there is
no way for the average reader to properly evaluate the full consequence
of urban development as intended under the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969:
Sincerely,
_
G ~:l~•- ~t ~
Galen S. Bridge
State Conservationist
~
R ECEIVED
L~V ~1
~ Iyl$
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARYNIENT
~
102
'
I 20. The DEIS on page 35 notes the 91-acre site has been designated as
prime farmland according to the Soil Conservation Services. For this
area to be designated as prime farmland, it not only has to have the
, soil quality, growing season and moisture supply needed to meet the
definition; but it must produce economically sustained high yields
of crops when treated and managed aecording to modern farm methods.
The site has been designated prime agricultural land, but the soil has
the following limitations:
(a) fertility is elassified as medium;
(b) the soil is excessively drained, with low water holding capacity;
(c) gravel and cobble is hard on tillage and harvesting equipment,
and provides a poor seed bed.
This past summer, 70 aeres of the site was cultivated in dryland
barley with a yield of approximately one ton per acre; not an
economically high yield.
The physical limitations of the soil, combined with economical
considerations discussed above, have to be considered when analyzing
, prime agricultural farmland. Changing markets require periodic
updates in areas considered prime agricultural farmland.
As discussed on page 65 under The Relationship Between Local
' Short-Term of Man's Environment and the Maintenance and Enhancement
of Long-Term Productivity, "Development of the 91-aere site into ~
a 268-1ot residential community will have an impact on the long term
productivity of the property in terms of its present agricultural use.
The property plays a small role in the agricultural economy of the
region and therefore the loss of the current use will have a slight
effect on agricultural productivity in the Spokane area. The reduction
of agricultural land, (marginal productivity), considered in light of
the increasing demand for moderate priced housing in the Spokane area,
' may be considered an enhancement of the long-term productivity of the
area."
~
103
~
aa
'
~1 t t~
STATE OF
DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY ,
~ - _ WASHINGTON Oiympia, Washington 98504 pV-11 206/7532800
, Dixy Lee Ray
Gouernor
December 4, 1978
~
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Department ~
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
Thank you for providing us with review copies of your draft environ-
mental impact statement for "Summerfield East, Planned Residential
Development."
Your well written impact statement was reviewed by Department of ~
Ecology s[aff, both here in Olympia and in our Eastern Regional
Off ice in Spokane. We wish to offer the following comments for
your consideration prior to preparation of the final EIS:
1.) The Summary of the Contents of the Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (page viii) should be updated to contain, at a mini-
mum,'the Draft Summary Report of '208' Water Quality Results 21, ,
and Cause Effect Relationships for Water Quality in the Spokane
Aquifer conclusion, that moisture from precipitation as
well as irrigation, runoff, waste disposal and other sources ~
percolates from the ground surface to the aquifer and carries
with it salts and other constituents." Additionally, it should
be noted that one of the recommendations of this report is ,
quoted as follows: "Urbanization has been shown to lead to
water quality deterioration and possibly is creating a public
health risk at current levels of development (bacteriological,
heavy metals). Land use and control or mitigating measures to
offset water quality changes which might be prompted by urban
land uses should be initiated. In other words, further land
development should be curtailed or corrective or mitigative
measures for runoff znd percolation initiated to hold pollutant
load to the aquifer at or below its present level to prevent
future aquifer water quality deterioration."
2.) We were pleased to note that this proposal provides for both
dry sewers and a location for any future on-site treatment
facility. The flexibility of this arrangement to meet future 22.
needs and/or circumstances is an excellent planning example.
An additional aspect to this effort which should be considered
would be the expansion of dry sewers to provide pipe not only ~
to the curb but also require builders to dry sewer into the
homes. This situation would allow minimal costs to homeowners
if hookup to a central sewer system becomes possible or if an
on-site plant is required. ~
'
,
~
21. This comment is no e. or further discussion, please refer to
comment 23.
22. This comment is noted.
'
,
~
'
io6
~
r-
1
Mr. Dayharsh
December 4, 1978
Page Two
Should you have questions, please contact Mr. Larry Peterson of
our Spokane Office (456-2926).
Yours very trul
. ,
.
eter R. Haskin
Environmental Review Section
PRH:me
i
R 1
ECEIVED
DEC 1 n
~
SPOKANE COUNTY
106 P iANNityG DEPpRTMENT
~
MEMORANDUM December 5, 1978
T0: Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director
FROM: Ray Card, '208' Study Project Ma nager
SUBJECT: Environmental Impact Statement, Summerfield East 23.
The '208' draft "Cause and Effect" report written by Dr. Larry Esvelt
was released for public use shortly before this draft EIS was written.
Dr. Esvelt has made some interesting conclusions regarding mans activities
on the 1 and surface and i ts effects on water qual ity. I would 1 i ke to see
the data contained in that report included in the final EIS for Summerfield
East.
~
R ECEIVED
r 1-, C. 1~ 1978
.J
.
SPQKAN~ dOUNT~
PIANNING DEPARTMK _tiT
107
1
,
23. The 11208" draft "Cause and Effect" report data was included within the
DEIS of the Summerfield proposal. The interpretation of this data and
' conclusions and recommendations of this report were not available at
the time of publication of the DEIS. Although the report is a draft,
and subject to change, and also has not been adopted by the county; the
~ conclusions most appropriate to Stimmerfield in this report were:
(1) "There are substantial differences in water quality between
peripheral sampling sites (along the edge of the aquifer and the
center or main stem). It is concluded that the slower moving
water along the periphery accumulates constituents percolating
from the overlying land and contained in runoff from adjacent
hillside areas."
(2) "There is an increase in the salt concentration of the aquifer from
the State Line where it flows into Washington to outlet springs
along the Spokane River and along the Little Spokane River. It
is concluded that these salts are contributed from overlying land
use activities."
'
(3) There is consistent variation of water quality with depth below
the aquifer surface at all but two depth selective sampling
points monitored during this study. Highest concentrations of
constituents occur near the surface. It is concluded that
moisture from precipitation, as well as irrigation, runoff, waste
disposal and other sources, percolate from the ground surface to
t the aquifer and carries with it salts and other constituents."
(4) "Bacteriological results indieate a potential risk of pathogenic
organism transmission from surface applied waste waters to the
aquifer. Further development and population growth over the
aquifer or on areas direetly tributary to the aquifer could
~ increase public health risks."
Recommendations of the report were made for consideration during
development of a water quality management plan for the Spokane-
~ Rathdrum aquifer in Spokane County, Washington. The recommendation
most appropriate here is: ...."Land use and control or mitigating
measures to offset water quality changes which might be prompted by
~ urban land uses should be initiated. In other words, further land
development should be curtailed or correetive or mitigative measures
for runoff and percolation initiated to hold pollutant load to the
aquifer at or below its present level to prevent future aquifer water
quality deterioration."
108
~
~
It is not known at this time what corrective or mitigative measures
may or may not be required in the future. It is known, however,
that permits will be required and waste water and runoff disposal will
have to be mitigated to the satisfaction of the agencies releasing such
permits or approving such plans. The proposed project does offer
flexibility in methods of mitigation of waste water disposal in the
future. (Reference page 32 of the DEIS.)
,
~
~
. ~
i
1
109
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES
WASHtNGTON
~ -
u ~ ; g. O!sm,wd. wash,ng,on 9&5oa 206/7s3 booo
« 115 General AdmmLstratron euddui
,
.
Dixy Lee Ray
nrGovernor
December 5, 1978
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Department
N. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
24.
Draft Environmental Impact Statement
Summerfield East
Spokane County WRIA T-55
We have reviewed the above described statement, and offer the following
comment.
Important foodfish resources in the area is limited to planted juvenile
salmon in Roosevelt Lake. Measures to reduce impurities entering the
Spokane River and adherence to state water quality standards are our
primary concerns.
We note mitigative measures discussed on p. 22 and feel that proper
containment of surface runoff either on-site or near site would help
aleviate downstream impacts and also guard water quality too.
Thank you for seeki ng our corrments.
b ~
Sincerely,
~ •~L ~C'CD~ ,
Gordon Sandi s.Q Y v
Director
~
mr ~
cc: DOE
GAME
R ECEIVED
.
' 1 ~ ~71N
SPOKANE COUNTY
PL,;,',1:hC DEPARTMENT
~110
,
~
24. This comment is noted.
'
~
~
~
'
111
~
OH'FICL; OF COUNTY L:NrjTN1:EIt
"pokane County, Washirigton
'
UuLf.• Dec. 5, 1978
T0: Fred Davharsh rector- f Plannine
~
FROM : Dpbrat z
SUBJECT : ~Draft Environmen il Im~act 5r_atement Summerfield East .
'
The following comments on the draft Environmental Impact Statement
for Su.-nmerfield East are submitted by the Utilities Department for ~
your revlew. Additional information on Transportation/Circulation
and Water will be submitted separately.
Water: Two different estimates are included in the draft
EIS as to the peak summer time flow on water consumption.
On pages 34 and V iii appear "2,000 gallons per lot" and/or 25.
"532,000 gallons per day", but on pages 26 and 61 these
figures are "2,500 gallons per lot" and/or "665,000 gallons
per day". Both seem high for consumption per lot based on
3.5 persons and small lot sizes (10,000 S.F.)
,
Drainage: The existing Forker Road basin drainage problem
may involve litigation prior to it's resolution due to the 26. ~
presence of the inadequate canal. Because of this and because
no storm water management plan for this basin is anticipat,ed
' to be forthcoming soon, storm drainage facilities are to be included
. that will insure the safety of the proposed project and adjacent ,
• areas. Storm drainage facilities similar to those described in
- the ADDENDUM TO SUMMERFIELD DRAINAGE REPORT in APPENDIX A appear
• to be adequate. ~
112
~
25. Representatives of Trentwood Irrigation have indicated that the
average homesite will demand 40,000 cubie feet of water per year
(299,240 gllons per year or 819 gallons per day over a 365 day
time period).
The Engineers for Trentwood Irrigation District have requested
a water system designed to supply a maximum of 2,500 gallons per
day per homesite, for maximum summertime demand.
The water consumption estimates found on pages 34 and viii should
read:
"22500 gallons per lot" and/or 11665,000 gallons per day."
26. This comment is noted.
~
113
- i
, , i.~ c~.~ I~~..~~.~~`' J'J ~ ~ ~ .~~r
1
OY!"iflLr ()74'
, I r~~„ 1 1
~F ~~=1~~ ' C 0 U N TY E N G i N E E R
~ . .
RO BERT S. TU RN ER
~ ~ ~ r ;s
COUNTY ENGINEER
1 ~a1~ ~ A 1
w ' r ~1~~lK.L~'r: ~t~1~.~311I~tfT!!.~' !1!l~ll I
„U ,.•.L Uecember 5, 1978
T0: Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Planning Department
FROM: Gary Kennaly, Planning & Trstfic Divieion Enginee~~,S
SPokane CountY Engineer 's Off ice
SUHJECT: I?raft EIS RevieW of Swnmerfield East
We heve completed our revieW and enalyeie ot the Draft EIS end ofter the follouing comments
for your conaiderntion.
Section 4. Transportation/Circulation
1. Trent Avenue ehould be ideAtified ae SR 290 becauee it is e Stete
Highuey and is under the jurisdiction of ths State Department of 27,
Tranaportation not the County }toad Department.
2. In addition to the arteriela mentioned in the Draft, Forker Road
and Progresa Road are deaignated arteriel8, edjacent to aad pro- 28,
viding direct accese Lo the propoaed developmeat but not mentioned
in Lhis portion of the Draft. 3. Due to operetional and geometric characterietica of Forker Road, 29,
additional right of vay dedication and construction of left turn
facilities enay be required to mitigete poesible traffic safety
ha.zarde from traffic entering thie proposed development trom Forker
Hoad.
4. Same etatement as #3 only reterring to Progress Road. 30.
5. Same atatem,ent ae #3 only referring to welleeley Roed. 31.
6. No mention as to impacte or provieions for pedeetrien and/or
biker fecilitiee on roade proposed in the plat. Sidevalka on neigh- 32.
borhood collector art►eriels are required and aill parti811y addrees
pedestrian facilitiee. To date the neighDorhood collector arterials
contained in thie plat proposal have not beee deaigna~ed.
114
'
27. This comment is noted.
28. This comment is noted.
29. This comment is noted.
30. This comment is noted.
31. This comment is noted.
32. Pedestrian facilities (sidewalks) are mentioned as a measure to
mitigate adverse impacts under 4.6 Traffic Hazards on page 52
of the DEIS. Provisions for bikepaths could also mitigate
potential traffic hazards within the plat.
'
'
~
115
!
ge 2
Fred Dayhareh
Draft EIS Rsvieu of Summerfield Laet
33.
7. Pedeetrian nnd/or biker facilitiee were not addreaeed for existing
arterials of Foiker Koad, Progrese Koed and Wellesley Avenue vhich
ere ell edjacent tu the proposed development snd uhich does pro-
vide acceea to etudente traveling to the elementary, junior and -
high echoola in the immediate vicinity ot the propoeal.
,
116
33. Pedestrian and/or bike facilities for the arterials of Forker
Road, Progress Road and Wellesley Avenue intended to provide aecess
to students in the immediate vicinity of the proposal have not been
proposed by the project sponsor, but should be ineluded as measures
to mitigte adverse impacts under 4.6 Traffic Hazards.
1
117
' - r - - ~ - - ~
r -
-
}f +
_ ~6~'?t r"l ~
-
I - - - _ _ _ -a- - - -
~
>
~ -
-
~ - ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ d~' .r1t ~►~'_.~c._a -
~ - - - ei- - - - ~ ~ r / ~ JJ ~ - - - - - - _ . -
~
-oo' a"o
- - -
- -
- - -
- - - ---a.w.- - - - - -
~ _
~
I - - - - - - - - - _ _
i ~
F QR
3-~a~~
DATF TIN1E
F-ROP-1 c+,~
F I Rht: 9 ~ „
f
A~.,--.A L;«E_~L t-auMUea ~re~v~iar~
C I FAX
Cl MOE3]LE ~
AREA L:OC3E 7MIrz TCl CALI
TELEPr,ONED pi.~k'-'F r/-\L ~
NEfCJRNED 'r'oUFl GALL
CAME TfiJ 5EEYOLJ i5H
WAh91'S TO SC-E YIJU
WAITING 7O SEE YOU ~ HDLJIf~] LINi''
h;+ L S SAGE ~
w r
4.~71
1
T.
'-7~
L4
FORM 4007
SIGNED ~rwIAD[N u_sA.
~
~ MESsAGE
z-~ ~ m
~ I '•-,y- I
DRAFT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
STATEMENT
~
C ~
f
/
OCTOBER 1978
i
•
LEAD ACENCY : SPOKANE COUNTY
i
•
,
DRAFr
ELWIFCNMENrAL ItMPACT STATIIME'NT
SUMMEIRFIELD FAST
PrPpared for
Wi 11 i am W. Ma in Investmmt Co.
and
T. D. C. Itr-.
Lead Agency: Spokane Gounty
Date of Issue : October 31, 1978
Date Comnents Due: Deaember 5, 1978
~
IrILAND PACIFIC IIJGINF.ERING & OONSTFa3CTI0~'V COttP.
E. 12720 Nora
Spokane, Washington 99216
•
•
~
INMODJCT ION
The proposed action under review is for a 268 lot resicientiat preliminary plat
and zone reclassification from the Agricuttural Zone to the Single Famity
Residential Zane. Both the preliminary plat and zone reclassification
applications have been submitted to the Spokam County Ptanning Department for
public hearings.
Tne pcoposed action was initiated by William W. Main Investment C,ompany anrl
T. D. C. Inc. The 91 acre site is locatp-d in the Spokane Vatlm.y, north of
Wellesley Avenu?, west of Sullivan Road and east of Evergreen Road.
The lead agency for this proposal is SpokanP County, and the responsible
official is Fred Dayharsh, Director of the Spokane County Planning Department,
N. 721 Jeffersan, Spokane, Washing ton 99260; telephone 1,5091 456-2274,
The proposed action may require the Eollaaing legal actians and permits:
(1) Draft and Final Enviraronental Impact Statements;
; Z► Zane reclassificatian approval;
131 Preluninary and Final Plat approval of SLunrnerfield East;
(4o Approvats or permits from the Spokane County Health District, the
Washington State Department of Sociat and Health Services and the
Washingbon State Department of Eoology For design and operation
of a sewage d isposal system; and
151 The obtaining of all required building permits, inspections and
approvals.
Copies o f th is document may be obta irp-d f ram the Spokane County Plann ing
Department for the cost of reproduction anc3 mailing.
This Draft Environmental Impact StatPment was issuAd on October 31, 1978.
In order to be incorporated into the Finat Environmental Impact StatPlnent,
publi c comnents and remar ks by consulted agenc ies or ind ividuals must be
reoeived by the Spokane County Planning Departrnent, N. 721 Jefferson, Spokane,
Washingbon 99260, an or before December 5, 1978.
Th is Draft Envi rorunental Impact Statement was prepared by Inland Pac i f ic
Engineering and Constructian Company. Data required to produce this document
may be obtained at the following address:
Inland Pac if ic Eng ineer ing & Construction Corp.
E. 12720 Nora Avenue
Spokane, Washington 99216
•
i -
•
~
~
~ ~NTENTS
INrRODUCfiION i
LIST 0F MAPS AND FIGURES iii
LIST OF TA3IF5 AND CHARTS iv
DISTRI&JTIQN LISfi v ~
SUIMARY OF THE (10LT r'!1I'S OF THE DRAF'T EIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . V i
DFjSCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL t
INIPAC'I' ANALYSIS 6
LIST OF E L E M E N ' I ' S OF TiE II N V I P O N M E N T . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Elemp-tlts Of the PhySiCal ET1virOt~llie~t 9
l. Earth 9 ~
2. Air, 14
3. Water 20
4. Flora................................................ 34
5. Fauna................................................ 36
6. Noise 37
7. Light and Glare...................................... 39 ~
8. Land Use............................................. 39
9. Natural Resouroes 43
10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Enission 44 '
Elements oF the Human Enviramnent 45
1. Population........................ 45
2. Econvmics 47 ~
3. Housing 48
4. Transportation/Circulatiart........................... 49
5. Public Services...................................... 52
6. Energy............................................... 58
7. Utilities 60
8. Human Health 63
9. Aesthetics........................................... 63 •
10. Recreatian........................................... 03
11. Archaeological/Histotical 64
12. Additional Fopulation Characteristics 64
THE RELATI4'_VSHIP B=4EEN LOCAL SI-DRT-TERi USES OF
MAN' S ENV A~.~1ll TfiE -MAINI`ENANr'. AND E;NfiAPVCE!~iENr
OF LONG-ZERM PFDDUC'I'IVITY.......................................... 65 •
IPRE:VEtSIBLE AND/OR IFZRETRIEVAF3LE
MMMMENrS CF RF5C7URCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
ALTERNA'I'IVES TO UM PRUFOSAL 67
~
F007NO'IES 72
APPENDICE.S A 73
APPENDICE5 B 81
APPENDICES C 83
~
ii
•
~
~ LI SI' OF MAP~'J AND FIGtJRES
Vicinity imap 3
Area N1ap 4
Site Plan 5
Soils Map 10
Topagraphy Map 13
Aquifec Wcation arO Seismic Prof ile . 23
Aquif er Transmissivity Distribution 25 '
Water Sampling Locatian 27
Water Quality 30 .
Water Servioe Locations 33
Land Use ►yap 40 •
•
Zoning Map 42
Average Daily Traffic Caunt Map 50
iii
. ~
LI ',':.'r OF TABLES AND CHARI'S
Suspended Particulate Surrmary 15
1976 Car ban Monoxide Levels 17
Arithmetic Mean of "208" Study Wells 28
208 Irvin Well Arithmetic Mean by Depth 29
•
Pbpulation Grawth in the Spokane Area 45
Population Projecticn for Spolcane Caunty 46
Schools Impacted by Project 55
•
Available Parks and R+ecreational Facilities . . . . 56
•
•
iv
~ DZ STFtIBUTION LI ST
U. S. Environmental Protectian Agency, Seattte
U. S. Soil Conservation Servioe, Spokane
Wash. State Department of Comanerce and Eoonomic Development, Spokane
Tgash. State Departrnent of Eaology, Olympia {2i (Note: I oopy to SEPA Register+
~Aash. State Eoological Catumissian Dept. of Foology, Olympia
, Wash. State'Dept. of Eoology, Spokane
Wash. State Department of Fisheries, 0lympia
Wash. State Department of Game, Spokane
Wash. State Department of Game, Olympia
Wash. State Departrnent of Transportation, Olympia
Wash. State Offiae of Archaeolvgy and Historic Preservatian, Olympia
Wash. State Department of Social arx3 Health Services, OlymQia
~ Wash. State DepartmPnt of Natural Resources, Colville
Wash. State Department of Natural Resauroes, Olympia
Wash. State Offioe of Programning, Planning, & k'iscal ManagemP_nt, O.lympia
Wash. State Utilities and Transportation ConIInission, Olympia
Wash. State Energy Offioe, Olympia
Spokane County Air Potlution Control Authority,
• Spokane County Building Department,
Spokane County Engineering Degartrnent, ;51
Spokane County Park & Recreaticnn Department,
Spokane County Ptanning C,ammissioan, (7)
Spo►cane County Planning Department (201
Spokarye County Prosecuting Attorney, Civil Division {21
• Spokane County Health District, Environmental Health Division (.3)
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane County Canservation District
Spokane County Public Library ;21
Spokane R._~ional Planning Canference (21
City of Spokane Public Library (1)
• City of Spokane Planning Department
Pac i fic Northwest Be 11 'I}elephone Campany
Wash ing tAn Water Poaer Gampany
Spokane Community Press
The Spokesman Rev iew
T'tip- Spokam Dai1y Chronicle
~ Spokane Valley Heratd
East Va11ey High School
East Valley Junior High Schoot
TrPntwood Elementary School
East Valley School Distr ict r3o. 361
U. S. Postal Service, OpQortunity Branch
~ 14r. Morey Hagg in
Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3
Valley Garbage Service
Spokane Valley Chamber of Ccmmterce
•
v
•
~
~
S"ARY OF THE COISTrENTS OF THE DRAFT E IS
Purpase and Obj ectives
The sponsors visualize Suutmerfield East as a response to the rapid growth the ~
Spokane area is experiencing. It is the intPnt of the sponsors to economir_ally
provide an environmentally planned residential development to include a pukilic
water system, paved and curbed streets, storm drainage facilities, se-wage
treatment facilities designed to mcet the approval of the Spokane County Heatt-h
District, and undergrounc3 utilities. It is anticinated th3t the project wilt
provide a fu11 range of housing units which will inclule housing opoortunities ~
for younger families with moderate inaomes.
Proposal
The proposed project is a planned residentiat development of approximately 91
acres with 268 lats, which wilt require the approvat of a pretiminary plat and ~
zone reclassification by the Spokane County Board of Gomissioners.
The site is located in the Spok3ne Valley, mrth of Wellestey Avenue, south
of the For!cer Road - Progress Road intersection, and woest of Progr?ss Road.
The development is planned to be phased cver a six-year periad of time with 48 ~
hanes to be constructed in 1979 and with 44 units constructed each year for a
five-year period. Project phasing, however, will be subject to market
conditions.
Surrmar y Impac t Analysi s ~
The analysis addresses Direct and Irx3irect Impacts, Mitigating Measures and
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts.
•
~
•
vi
•
~
~ Elements of the Physical Lhvirornnent
1. Earth
Direct and Inr3 irect Impacts
~ Disruption, displacement, oampaction and overoovering of soil wit]_ xcur, as ~~aell as minimal atteration of topograghical contours, :ahirh may result in
mirnr wirr3 attd water erosion during the construction phase. Approximatety
25 Dercent of the site will consist of paving and structures.
Mitigating Measures
~ ~.~ontainment of earth movement within roadway corridors anr-l faundation
areas. Replacement of soils where disturbed. The design of streets and
homesites in harmrmy with tocal topography.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
~ Mimr reconfiguratian of approximately 25 percent of the site. Increased
erosion potential during the construction phase.
2. Air
Direct and Ind irect Impacts
•
Stxort term air quality degradation will result during the construction
phase, with increased suspended particulate and equipment carbon *nonoxide
ernissions. Lang term impacts will result f rom i ncreased veh icular
emissions and fram hame heating units. Ambient increases are not to exceed
Federal levels. Future sewage collection systeTns, may generate obnoxious
~ odors.
Mitigating Measures
During construction, dust will be controtled 5y use vE water; and phasing
will localize the source of suspended particulate emissions. Paving of
• roadways and the enforcement of County air qua_lity standar_ds will mitigate
vehicular related emission increases. Public txansportation should be
encouraged.
3. Water
~ Direct and Irdirect Impacts
Surface watex movement and runoffjabsorptian will be altered as a result of
irrpervious surfaces covering approximately 25 percent of the site. The
project will rot increase the hazard of flooding in thP aiea; hcraever,
existing flood ing along Forker P,oac3 may impact 'Che proj ect .
•
vii
~
~
~
There are three sources that may impact ground water quality:
Approximately 30 , 000 gallons of waste water per day, storm water runoff
and the use of chemicals ;fertiliaer, herbicides, etc.►, jiaste water
disposal may be considered the most significant source, but the qua_lity of
the potential efftuent reaching the aquifer fram a subsurface drainfield •
will be improved over the quality of the effluent discharged to thP
drainfield because of biochemical treatment mechanisms that occur as the
effluent passes through the soil oolumn above the ground water. (Soil
colunn ranges in depth From 80 to 110 feet►.
To try to quantify the impacts of this developrnp-nt to the aquifer quatity •
would be extremely difficult, if not futile. The "208" tiaater Quality
Management Program, being conducted by Spokane County in cooperation
with the U.S.G.S., U. S. Enviromnental Protection Agency and the Washing ton
State Department of Eoology, have not to date provic3ed any definite
conclusion regarding recharge of the aquifer 5y drainfield, storm water
effluent, or chemical use over the aquifer. It is antieipated that in the •
near future, the "208" wi11 have a Cause and Effect Report deating with the
impact of urbanization on the aquifer. Current data 'irx3icates the
edges of the aquifer shaw generally higher levels of pottutants than the
main body of the aqu if er .
It is estimated that the project will result in the withdrawal of •
approximately 532,000 gallons of water per day at peak flvw ;sunnertime
usei. Trentvaood Irr igation Distr ict will provide water for damestic use
and for required fire flvw.
Mitigating Measures
•
A Spokane County Storm Water Management Plan woutd mitigate the drainage
problems caused by rumff in the Forker Road drainage 5asin. In 3ddition,
tAio methods of oontrolling storm water from this basin are available to the
project snonsor and aze identifixi in the Sunmerfield r^.ast Storm Drainage
Report ( see Atypend ix A1 . Increases in runoff, a result of imperviaus
surfaces, will be mitigated by the provision of on-site disposal, with use ~
of clrywells, curbs, gutters and appropriate street deszgn.
Proper drainfield site selection, proper insta_Llation operation ard
maintenance will mitigate the potential for gzound water contamination. The
installation of dry-line sewers wiLl a11aw foz more flpxible sewering
alternatives in the future whicfi may mitigate the ootentia.l for ground ~
water contanination. The gr4und water_ imDact could be mitigated by reducing
the density of the proposal. Hvwever, a lawer density project may -axclude
a nwnber of sewer alternatives.
•
viii
•
~
~
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There is a possibility of drainfield effluent or_ surface water runoff
reaching the aquifer. The "208" Water Quatity ManagPmPnt Program is 5eing
conducted to determine the extent and magr.itude of oontamination.
•
The long term oa;nmitment of water from the aquifer to serve the project
should be considered unavoidable.
4. Flora
• Direct and Ind irect Impacts
The project will result in the permanent disruption of current prime
agricultural soils for road right-or-ways and homesites. The Pxisting
flora will be replacec3 with larans, s'nrubs, trees and backyard gardens.
• Mitigating Measures
Tt-je permanent disruption of the cu?-rent agric.ultural land may be rnitigated
uy the introduction of lawns, shrubs, trees, fZaaers and backyard gardens.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
•
Permanent removal of agricultural crops on site.
5. Fauna
Direct and Inr1 irect Impacts
•
A decrease in the numbp-r and/or diversity of wildlife that inhabit thp- area
will occur.
Mitigating Measures
~ The retention of as much natural vegetation as possihle, as weil as the
introduction of larxdscaping.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The permanent removal and disruption of a portion of the wildtife habitat
~ is an unavoidable adverse imQact.
•
ix
•
~
~
6, Noise
Direct and Indirect Impacts
Inereases in noise levels c3uring the construction phase and during the ~
suburban residential periaci witl occur. Noise wilt be generated from
vehicle traffic and constructicxi activities.
Mitigating Measures
'I`he increasP in noise levels may be mitigated by limitation of c,nnstruction ~
activities to normal taorking hours, by mise buffering provided 5y homP
insulation and by the use of proper mufflers and vehicle-quieting devices.
Unavoidable I:rpacts
The increased noise tevels resutting from the canstruction phase and from ~
the suburban residential pericd may 5e considered an unavoidabte adverse
impact to some, but the increases will mt exoeed State and Fecleral
standards. .
7. Liqht and Glare
Direct and Indirect Irrpacts
Artificial tight will be required for street lightinq, interior and
exterior residentiat use, and for_ nighttime vehicle use.
yitigating Measuces •
•
The use of low intensity street lighting, as saeLt as g?nProus usp of
tandscaping and careful planning •,ahen dPtermining exact building
locations, will helr~ tro reduce the impacts of light and glare.
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
•
The project will result in increases in light and glare.
8. Land Use
Direct and Ind irect Impacts
~
The project will result in a change in the land use of the site from a
vacant paroel used for agricultural purposes to a single family r_esidental
deveZopnerit. The 91 acre site is proposed for a 208 lat subdivision,
; gross density of 2.9 lots ver gross acre+, a density Ltiat wnuld be
oo:npatible with the surrounding zesicientiat uses and co;tpatible with the
"Generalizcd Co:nprehensive Plan, Spokane MetroDOlitan Area," ~
x '
~
~
Mitigating Measures
•
With the use of an Architectural Control r.,omittee, restrictive covenants,
the apolication of controls available with ptanning, zoning and
suhdivision regulations, and thp- establishment of an orderly pattern of
clevelopnent and project phasing, adverse land use iTttpact eould be mitigatpd.
~ Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Those who desire "Lo :naintain the site in its present rural state may vie.a
the proposr-d land use as an unavoidable adverse i*npact.
9. Natural R,esources
•
DireCt and Irdirect I.Tnpacts
During the'construction phase of thp- project buitding, matPrials witl be
consumed; and during the suburban residential period, enetgy in the for;n of
fuels will be consumed. Prime agricultural soils on the site will be
~ devoted to residental land use.
Nsitigating Measures
Conservation techniques during the constructian phase and during the sub-
urban residential period may minimize the consumption of natural resources.
~ Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The project will oonsume natural resources during the constructian phase
and during the residential period. In addition, thp- use of pure
agricultural soils for residential soils is unavoidable.
~ 10. Ris1c of Mcptosion or Hazardous E7nissions
N/A
Elernents of the Human Enviroriment
~ l. Pbpulation
Direct and Irdirect Imepa.cts
Sumnerfield East wilt provic?e 268 lots for ttm- same number of singte-family
• residential units, to be constructed over a six-year period of time.
Assuming the L.~opulation multiplier of 3,5 aersons per single famity
dcaelling, the oomuleted p_*oject will provide housing for 938 gersons.
Mitigating LMeasures
Careful olanning and thp- develo._r~nent and imple-nentation of land use
S regulation can reduce population impacts.
xi
•
~
~
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
A population increase in this area may he considered by so;ne as an
unavoidablP and adverse impact.
•
2. Housinq
Direct and In,direct Impacts ~
Sumnerfield East will provide 268 lots for 268 single-famity residential
units, with hame selling prices ranging fram $40,000 t-~ $85,000. ~
Mitigating Measures
Project phasing will tend to ease the impact along with careful planning
and the implementation of lanc7-use regulations.
•
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Housing irrcreases in this area may be considered by somP as an unavoidabte
and adverse impact.
3. F.conamics ~
Direct and Irdirect Impacts
Thc project will require expenditures for payrotts and foc the nurchase of
materials, supQlies and services, while the completed projp-ct will increase
the assessed taxable vatue of the site and the proposed improvements to ~
$16 , 7 SO , 000 . 00 (19781
Mitigating Measures
None
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ~
None
4, Transportation/Circulation
Direct and Indirect Lmpacts ~
The project wilt create an estimated 2,144 one-way vehicle trips oer day.
The t•rnsportation and cir_culation pattern of the area s5ould remain the
same even with the proposed increases. The existinq Drimary and secondary
roads proposed to serve the site can handZe the incrnased capacity. ~
xii
•
~
~ The project will include an extensive internal roac3way system that will .
integrate with the existing roadway netcanrk and will be curbed and pav?d. ,
T:1e increase in tzaffic gpnerated by the project will also increase traffic
hazards.
~ Mitigating MAasures
'I'he develvpment of public transportatian, car pooling, the encouragement of
bicycle and pedestrian traffic, and strent layouts which discauragp- high `
speeds, with adecluate traffic controts, such as stop signs, where needed,
will mitigate potential transportation hazards.
~ Unavoidable Adv2rse Impacts
Increased traffic voiumes and hazards in the vicinity of the site a!:e
unavoidable adverse impacts. '
5. Public Services
•
Direct and Irdirect I.~npacts .
Additiona.l servioes will be required fcom many public agencies as aresult '
of the project, including Fire District 'Llb. l, the Spokane County StiPriff's
Department and, the Was"tiington State ?atrol, East Vatley School Distr.ict iv0.
• 361, par k depar tments , mai ntenance agenc ies , heal tti depar tments , etc.
Mitigating Measures
,
The increased demand for public serviees as a result of the project will.be
mitigated by the increased progerty ~-~x revenue generated by the project.
•
The impact on the schools will be mitigated by the expansion of facilities
providec3 through s-pecial levies and tax doUars. .
Unavoidable Adverse Zrnpacts
• This project will increase the demands for fire ancl police protection,
educational and recreational facilities, arxl for the maintenance of the
above mentioned and other governmentat servioes. DP-livery of these
services, at least initiallv, exceeds any offset due to increased tax
- dollars.
~ 6. Enerqy
Direct and Indirect Imgacts
The project will req'lire enPrgy during thP construction uhase and it is
estimated that the developrnent, when aomteted, will consume avproximately
~ 10.9 rniltion kilowatt hours of electricity per year and an estimated
xiii
•
i
+
!
~
1
!
134,000 therms per year of natural gas (based on heating needs of 25 j
percent of the project►. Current enerqy snurces are adequate *_o serve the ,
oroject. Irxdirect increases in consumption of energy and fossil_ fuels can ~
be expected.
. •
Mitigating Measures i
Energy conservation techniques fon come use wilt mitigate energy '
conswnption Lmpacts. ~
~
,
Unavoidable Adverse Impacts •
,
The project will result in increased consumption of energy tor heating, '
cooking, lighting, general household use and transportation. ~
7. Utilities •
Direct and Indirect Impacts !
The project will result in incceased demands on comnunicat-ion ;
service f ram the Pacific Northwest Betl Telephone C'.ampany, energy f ram ;
Washington Water Pawer Company ` see Energy, Section yo. 61, water frorn Trentiaood Irrigation District, on-site sewage disposal and storm dr_ainages,
and so li a waste f rom Va.11 ey Gar taage Ser v i oe . ~
Alitigating Measures ~ Close coordination between the project sponsor and the affected utilities
should mitigate notential i:npacts. ~
Approval of on-site sewage clisposal and stocm dra inage systems ay th? .
appropriate State and Gounty agencies.
~
Unavoidable Aclverse Impacts
•
The project will result in increases in utility sArvice. .
8. Human Health ,
; Refer to Scction 5"Other Governmentat Services") .
9. Aesthetics ~
y/A •
10. Recreation
(Refer to Section 5"Parks and Other R,ecreationat Facitities"o. ~
xiv
•
/
~ lt. Archaeoloqical/Historical,
Direct and Ind irect Impacts
A slig.ht possibility of the unearthing of archaeologica.l f inrls on the site
exists. •
~ Mitigating LMeasures
Cantractors can be macle aware of potential archaeological finds, what to
look for, ana what to do if something is found.
~ Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Possible disturbance of subsurface archaeologicat resourcPS.
12. P,dditional Pbpulation Characteristics
` N/A
~
• '
•
•
•
scv
•
~
AZteZT18t1VP_S ~
No Act ion
The site would remain in agricuttural proluction, but Excause of the continued
growth in the East Valley area, no action today rAnuld :nost likPly cesult in a
delay in the eventual deveiopment of the site. ~
Development Presently Permitted
The site has the Agricutturat Zone (A► ctassification, a tand use
classification for an area suitable for tarming and agricultural pur_suits.
Development under this alternative could result in similar if mt mote severe ~
adverse eriviromnental impacts than those identified for the proposed action.
Project Implementation in the F.iture
Could result in demands for a more intensive future aevelop►.nent due to
increascd costs. ~
Alternative Site
Project sponsors do not oum a similar parcet of land with similar locationat
advantages. If there was an alternate site availabte, the same environmental
elennents, traffic, site development, air quality, Urater quality, roise, light, ~
glare, utilities and services, etc., t.aould be impacted, (Less ground water
impact if site not located over aquifer.)
Atternative Densities
A lawer density development would mitigate impacts on aiz, traffic, roise, ~
utiliies, public services, etc., but would resutt in higher per untt cost of
housing, utilities and services, and coutd reduce thP number of sewage
alternatives.
A highez density developnent would increase the environmentat impacts, but
would allaw for less expensive housing, utilities and services; and a11aw for ~
moze revenue to be used towar.d mitigation of the adverse impacts.
Sewaqe Alternatives
Septic Tank - Drainfield - will function with minimum maintenance, does not
centrally collect effluent, does not provide flexibility for futurP sewe_r .
alternatives, allaws for individuat home owner maintenance and operation,
and may have an vnpact on ground water.
Central Collection Treatment - provicles a minimum of primary and secondary
treatment of effluent, eliminates the need foz individual home awners to
operate and maintain a separate system, thus assuring hetter maintenance, •
and may have an i,-npact on grouncl water.
xv i
•
~
~
DESCRIP'I'ION CF THE PRDPO6AL
A. Name of Proposal and Sponsors
The William W. Main InvestmP~t Ccmgany and T.D.C. Incvrporated of
• Sgokane, washington propose to develop apgzoxunately 91 acres for a
planned residential development to be called "Sumerfield East."
8. Location of Project
'rhe propo6ed project is located in the eastern portion of the Spokane
• Valley lying north of Wellesley Avenue, south of the Forker Road -
Progress Road intersection, and west of Progress Road as shaan on the
follawing vicinity map. The site occupies a portion of Section 35,
Tvvnship 26N., Range 44 East W. M., in Spokane County, Washington. A
complete legat description of the Surnmerfield East property is included
in the Append ix to the EIS.
~
C. Reference of Files
'Ibis pmject is on file with the Spokane Ccx.inty Planning DepartmPnt
as Preluninary Subdivision Number PE-1206-78 and Zone Reclassification
ZE-78 at N. 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, Washington.
•
D. Project Phasing
The anticipated date for initial devetopment of Sumnerfield East is the '
spring of 1979, at which time 48 single-family residential units would
be constructed. The project wilt then be implemented over an
~ additional 5 year period in annuat phases with 44 new residences
constructed each year.
It shoutd be noted that the phasing of this project is subject to
market demand and may be subject to change. Therefore, this document
addresses the project as a whole and is designed to identify the
~ cxmulative impacts of the whole development when completed.
E. Actian Description
The proposed project is a planned residentiat development of
approximately 91 acres consisting of 268 lots, with a gross density of
~ 2.9 lats per gross acre. Lot sizes will vary, but a tyoical lot will
hava. 30 feet of public-road frontage and a total of 10,000 square feet
of area. In addition, there will be three one-acre suburban tracts
fronting on Forlcer RQad. The project witl bP servpd by an internal
road network whidh will be paved and curbed and will tin!c the project
to Wellesley Avenue on the south. Atl roads will be constructed prior
e to occupancy of the home sites. EYnphasis has been place an gently
curving streets and short cul-de-sacs to encourage a quiet residPntial
environmp-nt.
1
•
~
~
Three peaestrian paths (easements) are proposed to connect Trentwood
Elementary School with tne project and its internal road network. '
For further disaission of the internal road systems serving the site and
necessary improvements, see page 49.
~
The project will be provided etectricity by the Washington Water Pow+er
Campany; and water by the Trentwood Irrigaticm District. The sponsors have
propcased a sewage d isposal systPm utilizing irdividuat septic tanks and
including dry-tine sewering. The dr_y-line sogers witl allaw for more
flexible sewering a.lternatives in the future. All utilities wilt be
undergrourxd. Storm drainage facilities will 5e designed and provided to ~
dispose of surface water runoff according to the requirements of the
Spokane Gounty Utilities Department.
The project is in the immediate vicinity of three school sites: Trentwooc3
Elementary, East Valley Junior High arzd East Valley High School.
•
The selling prioe for the lots within this pcoposed devetopment will range
fran $8,000 to $12,000, which is anticivated to gPnerate hausing which
will range in cost f rom $40,000 to $85,000.
F. Existing Land Use Plans and Zoning Regulations
•
Thp- site is located within Spokane County and is oonsequently under
the jurisdiction of the Spokane County Co.nprehensive Plan and Zoning
Regu lat ions .
The "Generalized Camprehensive Plan, Spokane Metropolitan Area" (last
revised and apQroved on October 22, 1908) designates the site for ~
residential neighborhood use.
The site currently has the Agricutturat Zone Classificatiori ;A1 , a land-use
classification designating an area suitable foc farming and agricultural
pursuits, ircluding cultivatian of land, fruit raising, truck farming,
livestock productian, dairying, poultry raising and forestry. Ccxmiercial ~
and irx3ustrial activities unretated to agriculture are Drohibited.
~
•
2
•
O~ nO ~
2~OD 206
N Z 3 95 2
m ~ I
J NEWMAN ~ HAUSER
(--e 206 ~
LAKE LAKE LAKE
WANOERMERE
. CJ
291 ~
- , ~
2 5 3
i
- • S I T E ~,0 90
~ ~
290
+
2
398 _
~fIE LTS ~
L18ERTY
~ gp ~ 10 LAKE
2 ~ ! ?
~ c-
:SPOKANE
INTERNATIONAI,/
y y
AIRPORT ~ ~ ~ 27 n n
. ~ 185
INI 1h11PU II U Fhllhl FMIh{i .y/
` lIIIMIRU( IIfN(IIMKINIIN~ ~ 1 I
,VICII\lITV MAP ~ - 400'~
L
fORKER
SANSON 100
rt,
C
~ PROGRESS
~
YC DONALO N ACOBS
2
WECLESLEY
FL ORA
r
TRFNT (P90)
~
,
ff-
~
~
ROLLING M/LL
SULLIVAN
SPOKANE R/VfR
INI 1M111 P~1 ~I I( PNl~lhl l MIM1(~ SPOKANE
+ AI i1NsINUi IIIiNt4iNWiNtIII~N ,
RIVER
AREA MAP
. • ~ ~ ~ • ~ • • • •
~ ~
~ + ~ ~
• , ~
b t~
i • 1
~ e~
~ 'v
~
~"..1 4 oF ~i~`'~ f'~-~~ / ~ r l
I ~ I
~ ~ ~ ` ~ ~ ~1 ~ 1 ~
i ~ ~ °a
, , ~ i ~ , .ti..._ r ~ ~
a ~ ~ - ~v . ,a„~ ~ . i . ~ a ~ . . . v~ ~ Q ` ~
~ ~ 1 ~ ~n ♦ h ~ r ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ I ` ~ ( r ~ 1 J • ~ r ~J~~ ,V i .r.~ ` ♦
~ ' ~ ~ ( t ~ ~ - + k~~ ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~ _ „ _.r..~~l~ ~ i r' , - ' _ ; . y w r
~ ~ ~ ' ~ _ ~ ~ I ^ ~I • y _ _ , ~ ' ` a 6 ~ ~ ' Y ' ~ ~
~ N ~ ' ~ . pI ~ ; . ___,1 1 , u~ . f; t ~ 0 " ' ~ I ~ Y i..-~~ ~ " ~ \ ~ ; ~ ~ „ ~ , ~ ; ~ , ~ ~ 1 ` \ ~
• i + „ ~ , s _ r _ ~ ~ ~ . , ~ ~
. i . ~ , ~ . a ~ ~ ' ~~i ~ ~ ~ Gy~ ~ r' ~ ~ ~ \ ~
8 ' _ _ ' . ~ ~ L ~ ~ \J • ~ 6 J ~ ` ~ " ~ ~ . v ~ ~
, ~ ~ r t ~ ~ - - - a e ~ w v, ~
, ~ , , ~ ~ ~ . ; r l , ~ J~ r i _ • ♦ f + ~ ~ ; . . : ) ; , ,
~ , ~ ~ ~ • 1 + _ . ~ ~ i '1 ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ' 1
V' ~ ~ ; ; ~ W ' ` • rt~ , ~ 1 ~tI ~T ) , - ` ' ► ~ ~
o ~ , ~ . . ~ ~ t , ~
` ~ r ~ ~ • " , ~ . ~ ~ ~ , ~ ---~-r - ; ~ , ~ . r ~ . +~`,.°~...y ~ _ . i.., . = 1 - ~ - - ~ i ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~~ r ~ r r ~ ~ ~ I b y , \ ~ ~ , l `T'~ , , , , _ , ~k -1 ~ ~ ~ /
~ ~ M~ l ) o „ ~ ~ ; . . ; ~ ~ - -ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1
V / + / - • ~ r "1 ~ ~.-r a • 1 ~ ~ ij ~ i ~ /
, I , r- 1 ~ ~ ~ w V~ M » ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ w ~ 0 / ~ . a , , • • ~ f f ~ , . i! ' %
• ' ~y " ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ^ . ~ / l a , ~ ~ ~n
~ / ~ „ • , . ~ ~ » ~ ~ ~ s r • ~4, Tj ----r . ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ • ~ ' ~ a ~----rt , ~ , ~ , i , ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~
~ ' . " ~ _ ~ M ~ { Y--~ ~ - • ' p ~ ~ ~ 1
.'~l ~ , „ i ~ i ~ ' ~ ~ i~ ~ . ~ • ~ ~ _-_,f - - _ .
'~'t ' J r , ' _ , , ~ / ~ , r , , ~
~ ' ~ c ~ ~ ~ ^ I ` Y • / ~ _.r ^ '
~ ~ ~"w ' y ~ y,~.` ~ r , - ~ _ _ - - ' • - ` _ r` ! ` {~j 't ~ ~ ' ir'c'~~C% ~ : ~s---'~- . ~ ♦ ~ f.
~ ~ o►~~ •
~ .
~
o~-~~ ~ r~~i
. ► ~ ~J~sta- ~ ` ia r ~f~' ~ b,oa°«~•~t ~ ~ ~ -
LO ~
oK.r~~-- ~i rfi .
o~i~V ~L; ~ ~
~jFqp~C~ ts~ ~J b{ .o►J~ e~,.~ZO~ ~~'OV~d
INM ~ ~ ~
OG• h~~~1~~~ 99L~V 9L2- i~
~
e.~l~+►~-~►~M ! ~T~-~~1►0~ 5J~-~+G~oL . f'.h' ° P~I'r~w.~aS~~ r, 9cs ~
~ `
, ; f,~~ r~..~~1~ ~1~LT ~ ~ 4~,'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- . ,
~ - ~o
~ ~
~ 300 b00
~ ~FEET
50 240 400 I
"t" ~ P L A 11J sr
- ~ 1
~
~ DSPACT A.NALYSIS
The follvwing is a list of those etements of the environment which may be
required to be addressed as per TAAC-197-10-444. The elements !ZOted as
"N/A" ( rot apolicablel have been deemed as ateas the proposed action
~ will not significantly affect, and are not addressed in the impact
analysis.
The Impact Analysis is a detailed discussian of each category and
addresses the follawing:
~ a. Existing Conditions of the Lnvironment.
b. The Probabl? Impact of the Proposed Action on the Envirornnent.
c. Measures to M.itigate the Adverse Impacts.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts resulting if action is taken.
(1) ELIDrS OF THE PHYS ICAL EVL _ M
•
x ~ a1 EART-i.
x ( i l Geo logy .
x ( ii► Soils.
x ( iii) Topography.
N/A ( ivi Unique phxsical features.
• x (w Erosion.
N/A ;vD Accretion/awlsion.
x (bo AIR.
x ; io Air quality.
x ~ i i► Odor.
41 x ( iii► Climate.
x ( c) WATE R.
N/A fil Surface water Movement.
x ( ii1 Runoff/absorption.
x ; i i i1 Floods.
~ v/A ( ivi Sur f ace water quant ity .
N/A ;vi
Surface water quality.
x ; v il Ground water movement.
x (viio Ground water quantity.
x ; viii) Grounc3 water quality.
x ;ix) Public water supplies.
~
x ; di F'TARA.
x ( ii Nurnbers of diversity of scecies.
x ;ii) Unique Species.
N/A ; iii► Barriers anri/or_ corririors.
x !ivi Agricultural crops.
•
h
•
i
• F
i
I~
x ; e► FAUNA. x (il Numbers or diversity of species. ;
x (ii) Unique species. ~
N/A (iiil Barriers and/or corridors.
N/A ; ivi F ish or w ild 1 if e habi tat . -
a
x ( f1 NOISE.
x ; gi LIGHT AND GLARE. x ; h1 LAND t3SE.
x ~ i► VATURAL RF,SOURCES.
x ( i► Rate o f Use. ,
N/A (iit Nonrenewable cesources. ;
i
. K
N/A (j4 RISK OF EXPLO6I0N OR HAZARDOUS EMISS IOISS .
e
; 2► ELFMENTS OF 'IHE HUMAN ENVIRCNMENT. 4
~
x . ; al P(PLJLATION. ~
:
x ; bt HOUSING. '
x ( G TPANLSPOIUAT ION jC IRCtTEAT I ON .
x ;i► Vehicular transportation generated.
NA ( ii) Parking facilities.
x ;iii) Transgortation systems. .
x {iv► Movement/circulation of people or goods.
N/A * ; v► Waterborne, rail and air traffic. ~
x ( vii Traff ic Hazards.
x ; di PUBLIC SERVICFS.
x ( i► Fire.
x ( ii► Pblice.
x ( iii) Schools. ~
x ; iv+ Parks or other recreational facitities.
x ~ v1 Mai ntenance .
x (vil Other governmentat services. .
x ; e1 E[VERGY.
x (i► Amount required. x ;ii) Source/availability. ~
x ; f) tPrII,ITIES.
x ;i► Energy.
x ( ii► Com-nunications.
x ;iii► Water. x ( iv1 Sewer. ~
x ; vi
S torm Water.
x ; vi► Sotid Waste.
7
•
~
~ x ; g1 HUMAN HEALTH ; incluc7ing mental heatthi.
N/A ( h► AESTHETIGS.
x ( i1 RECRE'ATION.
~ x ( j► AFCAEOL,OGICAL/HISTORICAL.
N/A ( k) ADDITIONAL POPtJLATION OWACTMISTICS.,
x (1) DCUNCMIC IlMPAC'I'.
~
•
r
a
•
~
t
S
~
~
` Elements of the Phys ical F.hv i roriment
l. Ear th
1.1 Geology
i a. Existing Conditions
Igneous and metanarphic rocks oovered by glacial ard flood deposits from
the Pleistocene epoch form the foundation of the Spokane Vatley floor.
The site is oovered by flood deposits ;QF1 fro.n the Great Missoula Flood
of prehistoric times and consists of bauldArs, vobbles, and gravel, mixed
• with sand in places. These deposits are mostly very coarse, very poorly
sorted, and open-textured; marginal parts contain various proportions of
flood-transported sand and gravel, rewocked kame and lake deposits, and
locally derived detritus. -
The northwest sectian of the property abuts the base of Pleasant Prairie
f Bench, a stratified geologic structure of kames and !came delta deposits
;QCS) of the Bull Lake Age.
Zlzere are no apparent geologi.cal hazards within the site or proxin►ity
thereof.
~ b. The Probable Imq:)act of the Proposed Actian
The proposed project should not result in unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geol.ogic structures.
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
•
%ne
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
None
~ 1.2 Soils
a. Existing Cociditicns
The soils of the site are variable, resultirig from a rombination
~ of glacial till, and sedimentary residuum. As shawn on the following
soil map, the soils are of the Garrison Series and consist of Garrison
g rave lly loam ;GgA1 and Garr ison very-g rave lly loam (GmB►.
Garrison gravelly loam (GgA) is the dominant soil of the Garrison Series
on the project site and also for a majority of the Spokane Va11ey. Its
~ surface color, when moist, ranges from very dark brown to black. The
texture of the surfaoe layer is gravet.lv laam or silt loam. The subsoil
9
•
~ • ~ - ,
Spokane
exlieme/r iockr M cg g aB
comp/er 20-70 McrD/e svndy /oom, 0-2096 Bernhi// si/J /oom
parcenl s/op• s/op 0-20 °.G, slope
W
SuE Ro• ~
W ~
O LL.
0-
oR~~~ ~ B b B in o
S~ F ~ Bernhi//si/J/oom
-p modsrote/r sAo//ow o
~ 0-2096 slope 0
Spokone verr rocky o
comp/ex 30 - 70 % ' 0
slope _ N •
-p O
O 0 0
0 ~
. PsA •
Phoebe sondy /oom, O -5 % slope
- ~
GgA
Goirison yrove//y %om , O -3 °b slope
~
GmB
Gorrison very yrove//y %oin, 0-8°.6 slope
_ S
2
O
F-
~
2 .
S
. N
Q
3
w
}
2
GgA ~
m
U W
W
Z
Q
Y
a
(n O
N
YYEL L ESL EY AVE.
W ~
~
~
0 ~
J
O
~
.r
cn
~ ~ a ~i , •
10
~
ranges in volor from dark brawn to yetlowish brown. Clay and lime have
accumulated on the bottoms of the pebbles in thp lawer subsail. The
depth to the gravel substrattun ranges f ram 30 to 55 inches. The soil is
somewhat excessively draa.ned and has moderately rapid permeability.
Surface rumff is slow, the hazard of erosion is slight, there is
negligible. risk of slope instability, and the soil has a low potential
~ for exhibiting shrink-sw+ell behavior. There is no danger of f rost
actian.
Garrison very gravelly loam (GnB) has a thinr.cr, more gravetly suzface
layer than Garr isan gravetly loam, a ruroff potential ranging From
slow to medium and an erosion hazard range from slight to moderate.
•
The soil depth to bedrock on the site is more than 84 inches and the soils
have a slight erasian gotential acoording to thP Soil Canservation Servioe
classification system data.
b. 'Ihe Probable Impaict of the Propased Action
~
The proposed development will require ternporary disruptions, displacements,
compaction, uncovering, and overooverinq of soils during the construction
of streets, utilities, building foundations and driveways. Generatly,
these impadcts will be in the form of the various oonstruction activities
relatecl to the development of the project. These activities witl in+clude
~ gradinq, trenching and excavatian for roads, underground utility lirbes and
basements. It is not expected that these soils will be removed fram the
site but will be redistributed on-site as part of individual lot develop-
ment.
Once the project is develaped, approximately 25 percent of the soils
~ will be oovered by asphalt streets, driveways, hames and accessory
structures. Thp- remainder of the site will, most likely, be landscaped
acxording to the taste of the individual homeawner.
c. Measures to M.itigate Adverse Impacts
~ The disruptian and displacement of soils during construction of the
houses, accessory structures, streets, stor.m drainage structurQs, and
during the extension of power lines, telephone lines &-id television cables,
wi11 be mitigated by returning the affected soils to their or.iginal
oondition. In additian, the containment of earth movement within street
right-of-way corridors, foundation areas, and other site areas requiring
~ reconfiguration of the existinq soils wil1 minimizz the inpact the proposecl
residential development wi11 have on existing soils.
d , Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
With 25 gercent of the soils on the site proposed to bp- covered hy
~ impervious surfaces; `e~oorary disruptions, disptacements, compaction,
uncovering, and overcovering of soils du_ring the constructi.on phase will
take place.
11
•
~
~
1.3 Zbpography
a. Existing Conditions
The site is essentially flat and slopes at approximately 2/3 of 1 percent
from northeast to southwest. The map on the follawing page shoas the a
site's topography as a gently rollirg, rel_atively flat plain with the
steeper slopes of the Pleasant Prairip- hills lying northwest of the
project.
b, The ProSable Impact of the ProposPd Action
No significant alterations in the topography of the site are anticipated as ~
a result of the project. The impacts which will oecur will take ptace
during the construction phasP of the project with earthmoving and
excavations associated with roadway cuts and with grading for homesites.
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
•
The design of streets and lots in harmony with the existing topography
will minimize the potential impacts on surface relief features.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The mimr reconfiguratian of approximatety 25 percent of the total site for ~
roads and structures is an unavoidable adverse impact.
1.4 Unique Physical Features
N/A
S
1.5 Erosion
a. Existing Conditians
The sQils on the site are of the Garrison Series and have a slight erosion
potential. In addition, the tetrain is gently sloping and coverpd in ~
residual vegetatian, factors which atso help to reduce the erosion
potential.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Actiori
During the construction phase of the project, there will be some removal r
of soil oover and earthmoving on-site for the preparation of building
sites and roads, and in the placernent of water, scwer, and other utility
lines. But because of the slight slope of the site, it is not expected
that there will be any significant watQr-r?lated erosion problem. Wind
may present a slight erosion problem over exoosed soils, but consider ing
the nor.mal weather cond itions on the si te, th is problem should 5e romi nal. ~
12
•
~ w • • r • ~ • r► • ~
~
1
N
O
~
N
~O
O \
T
O
'A
~
~
'A
. . . ~
~
O
~ o
~ N
O
\ , \
v r
F~
W
~
,
~
~
I I PROGR£SS R0. I
TOPOGRAPHY 1 fEET
~ 30 500
50 200 400
~ SOURCE: I.P.E C.
~ ~ ~
~
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts i
Potential erosion during the construction phase may be reduced by project
phasing and the use of water to hold dawn dirt. Af ter construction, thP
develop:rmt's impervious surfaces, storm drainage features, and
landscaping will minimize the potential of wind and water erosion.
• i
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
During constructian of the project, a minimal increase in erosion potential
from water and wind is unavoidable.
1.6 AQCretian/Awlsion N/A lb
2. Air
2.1 Air Quality
a. Existing Conditions 4p
The U. S. Environmental Protection Agency has established standar_ds for
six classes of primary air polLutants which inctude: suspended
partiallates, sulfur dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide,
photochemical oxidants and hydrocarbons. The State of j4ashingt4n has
also established air quatity standards for thP same six ctass?s of air ~
pollutants.
The Spokane Gounty Air Pollution Cantrol Authority (SCAFCA) maintains an
air-:nonitoring netdork throughout Spokane area, and has determined that
ambient concentrations of suspended particulates and carbon monoxide
exceed both the 'rJashington State and the Federal standards in heavily i
traveled areas of Spokane County, most notably during times of poor
disoersal because of climatic conditions.
Suspended particulates oonsist of finely divided solid or liquid particles
which remain suspended in the atJnosphere. Zt is estimated that
particvlates have diarneters of 10 microns or less and have little sPttling .
velocity. Susgended particulates include smoke and various dusts, and have
proven to imrease the incidence of respiratory illness and can cause the
reduction of visibility, and excessive soiting of exposed materiats.
The sources of suspended particutates iryclude industr ia1 sources,
residential heating, agricultural activities, internat fuel oomhustion and
traffic over unpaved roads, driveways and parking areas. It is estimatpd S
that 40 percent of the tottal particulate emisions in the Spofcane
Metropolitan area are pcoduced from the automohite and traffic over
unpaved su r f aces .
Suspended pacticutate concentraticros have been recorded at various Spokane
manitoring stations and a sunmary of these concp-ntrations is found on the ~
fotlowing page. The primary Fp-derat ambient air standards require that the
t4
•
annuat geometr ic mean "TSP" levels not exceed 75 m- :rograms per cubic
meter of air. The secbndary "'I5P" standard has 60 micrograms per cubic
meter of air limit, which is exceeded over much of the Spokane Valley
flOOr. ~ -
~
SUSPENDED PARTIQ3IATE SUNMARY •
~ Station 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977
Turnbull Wildlif e Refuge 22.01 21.06 19.06 28 27
Rogers High School 67.04 55.12 58.81 73 73
•
City Hall 75.22 75.23 58.80 81 83
Ganzaga UniveCSity 82.35 75.47 64.06 83 79
Zellerbach 86.12 89.96 79.64 149 131
•
Chemy City Hall 59.41 47.80 73 62
Millwood City Hall 59.30 59.02 74 77
Aluminum Supply Camnany 148.19 99.26 143 127
•
University City 97 75
Washington Water Pawer 82 70
Cooper Elementary 77 70
•
Sheridan Elementary 122 89
East VaLley High School 63 41
~
SouYoe: Spokane Gounty Air Pollutian Control Authority.
`
15
•
~
~
The project site is not located within the designated ron-attainment
area, ;an area that exceeds Fecleral TSP standardsl. The East Valley High
Sthool, located just east of the project, is a TSP monitoring station
which in 1977 recorded the lawest particulate level for any urban
monitoring station in thP county. s
Carbon monoxiae is the product of inconmlete combustion of fossit fuets.
It is estimated that 90 percent of the carbon momxide is generated by the
gasolim-pawered engine, while the remaining 10 percent is from heating
units.
Car bon monoxide is an odor less , oo.lor less gas wh ich can be f atal when ~
exposed to high levels over an Pxtenc3ed period of time. Federal a*nhient
air standards require that carbon momxide levets not exoeed 9 ppn for an
eight-hour average more t-han once per year. This standard is
consistently exceeded within the Spokane Centrat Business District anc3
along North Monroe and North Division streets below the hitl. The .
Spokane Central Business District and porticns of the Division and Nonroe
Street corridors have been designated as nan-attairnnent areas for carban
monoxic3e by the Enviranmental Protection Agency. Carbon momxide levets
have also been recorded at various Spokane area monitoring stations and a
summary of these levels is found on the f_ollvwing page.
Carbon monoxide concentrations tend t+o be very lxalized and dep?ndent to ~
a large extent on local traffic vo3.urnp-s and congestion. It would he safe
to conctude that the carbon moroxide concPntrations near the sitP are
substantially lvwer that Federat ambient air maximum levets.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed A+ction
•
Ccgnpletion of the project s!'outd not result in any siqnificant air
quality irnpacts. The development of the site witl have an impact on the
ambient air quality, first during the construction stage of the project
and second during the operational phase.
Air pollution during the construction phase of the develapment will •
result fram dust fran tand clearing and construction activities,
emissians f rom the operaticn of the constructian equipment, and enussions
fran general construction-related traffic and paving operations.
The principat source of air poLlutants occurring after the deve.lopment is
the aut+mrobile. In addition, emissions from home-heating and air- ~
conditioning systeTm, and from fireplaces will be air-poLlutant
contr i bu tors .
s
16
s
~
1976 CARBCN MOiVOXIDE LEVETS
!
Total Tota1
1-hour 8-hour 8-hour Violation
Station Maximum Maximum Violations DaVs
1
Department of iNatural Resources 22 16 32 ' 21
~ 2
Peyton Building 24 19 43 35
3
Post Offioe 34 22 65 51
4
Colucnbia Cycle 35 27 118 55
~ . S
Divisian Street 21 16 17 13
6
Dar 1 Apartments 39 17 29 26
7
Boone Street 16 12 5 6
~ 8
Valley Chamber of Ccxmnerce 12 9 0 0
9
Boone Street No. 2 31 16 7 7
Kersnaw's 38 24 137 99
~
Monroe and Indiana 10 25 16 39 27
11
Trent Avenue 22 16 12 9
City Hall 31 21 57 45 .
Established 7/20/76.
2
Special CBD study, established 9/13j76.
3
Established 7/19/76.
4
~ Esta5lished 7/27/76.
5
Disoontinued 7/9/76.
6
Fsta5lished 7/23/76.
Disoontinuec3 Ll/7/76.
8
Established 11/22/76.
9
Esta5lis'.,P-d 11/23/76.
10 Source: Spokane County Air
~ Discontinued 4/11/76. Follution Control
11 Authority.
Discontinued 3/25/76. 17
•
~
~
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
During the consitruction phase of the project, dust will be controlled by
water sprays and by dust vo_Llutives. In addition, atl construction witl
be conducted under the regulatory authority of SCAPCA.
~
To reduce motor vehicle related emissions, atl roads should be paved, and
the Federal Autamobile Enission Control Standards should be implemented.
d. Unavoi dable Adverse Impac ts
Unvoidable adverse impacts dur ing construction would iryclude any dust that ~
proves uncontrollable, hydrocarbons through evaporation from asphalt,
concrete, etc.; and emissions f rom the constructian equipment.
2.2 Odor
a. Existing Cond itians w
,There are no significant or unusual odors genPrated on the project site.
The existing agricultural uses cre3te no unusual or obnoxious odors.
b. The Probable Impact of the Propased Action
The proposed development wilt not havP a significant effect on odors in ~
the area. During the construction phase of the project, odors may exist
due to the construction and paving activities.
No odors are e xpecteci from thP development of septic-tank drainfietds.
The provisian for dry-line sewers will, in the future, allaw for the ~
possibility of any number of sewage-oollections systems; some of which
may generate odors.
In addition, the increase in vehicle traffic and emissians will increase
the level of typical vehicle exhaust odors on the site.
c. Measures to Nlitigate Adverse Impacts ~
Proper operation and maintenance of spwage-disposal systems and
implementation of Fedetal Autamobile Enissi4n Control Standards.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
~
The proposed development will result in a minimal increase in odors as a
result of the project constructian, and an increase in motor vehicle
emissian odors and other odocs typica.l of residentiat developments. The
possibility of se.4age-treatment facilities on site in the filturP may
ircrease the potential for odors. `
18
•
a
• ~ '
2.3 Climate
a. Existing Ccnd itions
The site is located in the Spokane Valley, which has a temperate climate
i with four distinct seasons. Precipitation averages 20 inches per year
with the majority coming from OctAber through June. Peak precipitation
is nozmally in Deoember in the form of snawfall. "In an average sumner,
10-20 thunderstorms occur between March and Oct:4ber with the greatest
frequency during the warmest months. (11 There are about 6,655
heating degree days in an average year (Base 55 degrees F or 18.3 degrees
i 0 . The highest temperatures expected are about 102 degrees F, 139
degrees Ca and the lvwest probable winter temperatures are -24 degrees F
;-31 degrees C► . There are usual.ly 120 to 130 frost-f ree days per year
in the Spokane Valley. Sunny days are rare in the winter and no-rmal
during the sumner. Prevailing wirx3s are from the southwest in sumner and
from the northeast in winter. The average annual wirxl sveed is about seven
~ miles per hour (tl KilamPters/hourl. "Winds in excess of 25 miles per
hour {40 }rnor1 are observed tess than two percent of the time. Extremp-
wind speed at 30 feet (9 meters) above the ground can be expected to
reach or exceed 50 mph (80 )am/hrl orice in two years, and 80 mph ! 129~n/hri
once in SO years." The average daily solar racliation is 359 Langleys
(calories/square cm/hours. Considerably more is received in July (651
~ Langleys/day average) than in Deoember (76 Langleys day average).
This means, generally, that Solar energy for home heating is least
available when it is most needed. For sotar cooling (evaporative amrnania
and freon systems) , sunlight is nmt available when it is most needed.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Actian
s
Local air flvws may be somewhat altered by the construction of new
buildings. No significant changes in temperatures, wind directions or
velocity, humidity or precipitatian is expected.
c. Measures ho Mitigate Adverse Impacts
•
Nane
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
None
~
~
19
•
~
3. Water r
3.1 Sur f ace 'gater ?Kovement N/A '
3.2 Runoff/.1lbsorption
a. Existing Conditions
On site observatians oorroborated with material f ram the Soil Survey,
Spokane County, Wash., verify that the soil is well drained. Presently,
all on site precipitation is disgasecl of by direct absorption or
evapotranspiration. There is little or no a-vidence of any surface runofF ~
activity with a moisture holding capacity of a}oiit 0.1 iraches/inch of
soil and 40 inches (102 cml of moisture in the upper layer of soil when
saturated. Below that it is probahle that this soil vould hold an
estimated .OS inches/inch (cm/cm) for_ another 56" {142 cm► or 2.8 inches
(7.1 cm3 of moisture for a total moisture holding capacity of 6.8 inches !17.3 cm►. The deeper Garrison soils have less than five percent, by ~
weight, of material which is 0.074 millimeters or less in diameter (fine
saryd► and less than 20 percent by weight, smatler than two millimeters in
diameter ( aoarse sandl. The observaticn of a ten foot deep (3.1 metersi
excavation at the southwest corner of the project site shawed '
considerable fines available even at that depth. roVith root grawth
evident to a aepth of nine feet t2.8 meterst it is obvious 4.--hat the loamy .
strata of this Garrison soil was considerably deeper than the profite
which was taken for the Spokane County Soil Stuciv at Mission Road anc7
Molter Road. Belaa the nine foot depth it appears that the soil is
sufficiently coarse that rroisture tolding ability is sufficiPntlv lacking
to d iscourage root growth. Fro:n Table 24, Washinqton Climate, onP can
assume that evapotranspiration essentiatly depletes soit of excess s
rnoisture from April thr.ough October. Then f_rom November through March
about 10.5 inches {26.7 cmi by interpolation, of orecipitation is
received than is disposed of by evapotranspiratian. In a water budget
analysis, moisture received tprecipitation► Pquals absorption ptus
evapotranspiration plus runoff. As was previously stated, thPre is no
evidence of significant runoff. Absorption equals the amount retained by
the soil plus groundwater recharge. From previous catculations, the ~
amount of moisture retained is aproximately 6.8 inches ;17.3cm► leaving
10.5 imhes, minus 6.8 inches or 3,7 inches ; 9.4 cinf of grourxiwatez
recharge, average, during winter :ttonths. Obviously, on vexy dry yeazs,
there may be little or no recharge, and on very wet years there could be
more. .
1
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
Introduction of impervious surfaces such as roofs, driveways and paving
oould reduce the absorptian rate by 30 percent on the project sitP.
Roofs in Spokane do not tend to have r_azn gut`ers pxcept short lPngths
ov2r entry ways. For those with rain gutters, rain water either falls on ~
a splash block ard is abosrbp-d in lawn, or a small dry wett is providp-3
for absorption. Nor.mally little, if any, of this runoff from roofs
20
~
~
~ reaches street gutters. Uvh ill dr iveways f roan this type of proj ect
would contr ibute as much as 700 to 800 square f eet of imperv ious
sur f ace per homP s ite . Daamhill dr iveways are normally equ ipped
with drains and drywells. The topography on this site is so flat that it
is anticipated that almost all garages will be slightty afbove strp-eet
.level.
• .
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Effects
Where runoff is increased due to the creation of impervious surfaces over
the soil, the provision of drywelts for increased runoff disposat will
eo:npensate for localized reductian in a5sorption. The drainage otan will
` be submitted to the Spokane County Engineer's office for approval.
d. Unvoidable Ac3verse Impacts
Provided that the storm water disoosat system is designed to Spokane County
Standards, no adverse impacis are anticipated from storm water rurloff.
~ 3.3 Floods
a. Existing Canditions
The project is suff iciently axove the Spokane River Flaw to be out of the
~ 100 year flood plain. It is, hawever, at the base of Forker Road which
drains approximatety 1260 acres of farm and timbPrland. The naw defunct
Spokane Land and Vlater Company had lwilt a canal alang the nort-h edge of
the Spokane Valley in the vicinity of this projecr_. The canat flawec3
,sestward alonq the valley edge untit it reached a natural drainage way
which joiried the Spokane River at Plantes Ferry Par_k on Upriver Drive. In
~ its present state oE repair, the canal is inadequate to handle pea:{ spring
runoff and some washing occurs across Forker Road below the Miller house.
It is apbarent that brush, debris, inadequate driveway culverts and
sagg ing emban!anents have consideraaly lowered the carrying caAacity of the
canal. In one particular case, between McDonald Road, extendec3, anc?
For ker/Evergreen Road, extAnded, an outr ight breach has occurred with
. considerable erosion evident. Although the canal was not originally built-
for that purpose, it is very probahle that Spo'cane County has, by long
term usage, proscriptive water rights to use the canal for drainaqe. The
onty other condition which woutd cause occasional ponding would be a quick
thaw with frozen ground conditions. AI1 of Spokane rounty is subjPct to
this phenomenon from time to time.
~
21
a
~
b. Ttie Probable Impact of the Proposed Action ~
The proposal itself traoutd not increase the hazard of flooding in the area
or downstream. If uncorrected, the ?xisting drainage problPm on Forker
Road could subject the homerydners using r^orker Road to the nuisance of
driving through an inch or two of water for a few days each spring. ~
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
Installati.on of drywe lls, curhs anrl gutters and appropriate street design
witl provide adequate stor;trwater management on site. The project is
situated on an exceptionatly good soil for absorption disposal of runoff ~
water. Drywetls penetrate the frost layer and permit disposal of
runoff during frozen ground conditions. For off-site ;or-nding hazard,
prascriptive water right for drainage wt-)uld permit the county to restore
and mainta in the cana 1 f or runo ff management f ro:n For ker Road Draw.
Further, if the cross-section and slope of the canal prove to be
inadequate for peak runoff flaws, there are arAropriate storm water ,
detention/retention sites available above the intersection of Forker Road
and Progress Rcaad. This woutd best be handled by a Spokane County
Stormwater Management Plan for that drainage basin.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
None ~
3.4 Surface Water Quantity N/A
3.5 Surface Water Quality N/A
3.6 Ground Water Mbvement ~
a. Existing Conditions
The project site is located over the Sookane Vatley-Rathdrum Prairie
aquifer, except perhaps the noctherly few hundred feet. The ground water
movement of the aquifer is generatty from east to west. The direction of •
flaw and the boundaries of the aquifer are shown on the Aquifer Lxation
and Seismic Profile 'Map on page 23. ThP project is locatec3 near the
margin of the aquifer where the depth of the aquifer is thirlner than the
rnain ba7y tA the south. 'I`he transmissivity, or the ability of water to
flow at a certain point, is a function of the depth or_ thicknes of the
aquif er to that point. This would result in generatly Law transmissivity t
of the aquifer along the margins oF the aquifer than the main body to the
south. Lower transm?ssivity of the aquifer in the vicinity of the vroject
site cnuld result in lawer flaw rate pa-r unit widtti. ~
s
22
•
1~ ~ ~ • • ! ~ • •
CHICO*
. ~
WASHINGTON C IDAHO
.
. ~
-
:
Newman Lake RATHDRUM
: •
. ~
.
•
Five Mile Prairfe Hauser Lake Hayden Lake
Hillyard Protile
POST FALLS
~ ~ •
• ;V •
' ! \ COEUR D' ALENE
, ' •
.
' S10fe Llne PrOflle
: .
SPOKANE Liberty Lake Coeur d'Ale
VALLEY ne Lake
NILLYARD 1ROUCN
,
' sPO►caNE : SEiSMIC PROfIIE
oiz
■ <Ip zio
Moran Prafrle ; AiD Ni=
Im °zl
I I
W STQtE IINE SEISMIC PROFIIE
2000 . ~ ~ ~ ~ ► ~ ~ 4
Elovatian in feel aDove
mean IIea (evel OLACIAL 9
1e0a ~ - ~ . ~ . : ~s
ACIAL • WATERITABLE'~f~~~~F1
~ a♦ •.1~i ~F ~t
100- FLUVIAL DEP091TS
:::r: {,i...~'• -
LATAH FORMATION~\~'
w` N~ q~`,
1.404-
- \ ' - -
120 Q
I
"IORANITE ROCK ORANITE ROCK ~
1000 _
i $0 0%
~ I I I
O I f I 1 I ~ I ~ I I I I
Ct7 Ol lP N O N 01 OQ 61 rP N O N ~A dl 00
r.i~•nv~~~tu t~~ihtiwiti~, C) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
I IIIIhUUWIp\Ilua O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
~ DiotancQinfrom indica►ed reference p o o O o 0 o p o O O O o 0 0 0
AQUIFER LOCATION AND
i~.
SEISMIC PROFILE
SOURCE* SPOKANE CITY PLAN COMMISSION
i
~
Calculated qround water vela:ities are relztively high for a ground water ~
svstem. Ca1_cu.lations varv `ro~n 90.5 feet oer c~ay at Sta}e Lirx~ to 41.1
feet per day at the Hillyard Trough, both catcutated by the U. S. Army
Corps of Engineers, 1976. A c3ifferent set of esti-mated aquifer
characteristics led to calculated velocities of 54 feet per day at Stal-e
Line and 47 feet per day at the Hillyar.d Trough. The trans?nissivity
•assumed for 'the second calculated flow is shawn on the Aquifer 40
Transmissivity Distribution Map, page 25. The second catcutations anre
calcu.lated by the U.S.G.S,, 1978.
The catculated transmissivity of the aquifer in the vicinity of the project
would be approximately 2.5 x 10.6 feet z.~er day. The velocity of flow could
be assumed to be in the neighborhood of 50 feet per day under the project ~
site. These values are relativety high ar-d irr3icate a verv dynanic system
rather than a stable pool of water.
ThP water level aontour for the site is approximatety elevation 1,940;
hawever, the level is variable. During a normal year, the water tabte
fluctuates on the order of 5 to 10 feet. Given an elevation of 2,030 to !
2,050 on the projer_t site, the water table would be on the order of 90 to
110 feet belvw the surface elevation. 'I'his is su'~stantiated by the well
records of the Trentwood Irrigation vretl on the northeast corner of
Pragress and Wellesley, across the street fro:n the proposa3 projenct.
b. The Probable Impact of the ProposPC.3 Action ,
The project is _1_ocated near the maZgin of the aquifer where the
transnissivity arx3 flaw of the aquifer are lawer than in the main body to
the sout~. TnThile it is not anticipatec3 that the prol~osed project will
have any peroeptible impact on the hyr.3rology of the aquifer, the existing
tiydro logy of the aquifer will have abearing on potential impact on ground .
water quality degradation frm project related effluents.
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
None
d. Unavoida5le Adverse Impacts !
:vone
3.7 Ground Water Quantity
a. Existing Conditions 1
The Svokane Valley-Rathr3rum Prairie Aq.iifer flcxas under the site except,
perhaps, the northly few hundrec3 feet. The *otal estimat?r-i fla.v under the
project site is on the order of 80 cubic feet oer second ;cfsl ;2.33 cubic
meters/secord1. Z`his estimate is baserl on anunber of assizrotions in
projecting valups from thp- "208" Stur3y and previous studies, and coutr? he ~
as much as an order of magnitude higher or lv,ier. There is an 4xisting
?4
~
~ ~ ~I ~ ~ i ~ ~I ~ • •
,
~ AQUIFER 80UNDARY
WELLESLEY AVE.
.
SPOKA NE R/ VER 0 6 ~
~ninu• 2.5 XI
~ r
2.0 X 10 6 c :
n
- . z
rIq
N~Nsssss, 0 :b ~
.
Ln n''-CITY LIMITS r~EN ~
~ 7 .N A INTERSTATC 90
. ~
. ~
.
,fA~~~ ~ M/SSION AVE. ~
.
~ 0 y
~
BROADWAY AVE.
~
0 ,
SPRAGUE AVE
IVI1N1)P14 111IrI~11M1~,
dOooomm I ~ ~ I
`8uh11N1iII1MiMWiMUIiH ~ I AOUIFER BOUNd'ARY
AQUIFER TRANSMISSIVITY 0,~;2 o.~s n~-+
DISTRIBUTIDN
SOURCE ; U.S.G.S.
t ~ i 1
~
~
well at the corner oE Progress Road and Taellestey Avenue which was dr itlew-i
98 feet to the aquifer. It is ahigh volume wetl operated by Trentwood
Irrigatian District whic;h indicates rnnetration of the aquifer. Projecting
fron figure 3 in the "208" Interim Water Quality monitoring Report, Febru-
ary, 1978, there is a flag of ahout 850 cubic feet per second ! 25m3/sec.►
in a cross section near Trentwood for the entire aquifer. tqith existing ~
data, it is extreanely hard to Azed ict flaws at any g iven point and
the hydrology of the aquifer is currently b?ing ;nore closely looked at by
t-he 112081, Study. ,
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposec3 Actian ;
The maximtun surunertime c3emanci for water f rosn the aquifer as supotied by
Trentwood Irrigatian District would 5e 2,500 gallons per day per homesite
or about 665,000 gallons per day for the project of pe3'{ daily demand.
This translates to 1.03 cubic feet per second 1.03m3/second► or about 1/10
of 1 percent of the available estimated flaw at that section. ~
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
i
Energy and resourae conservation progra7.s -have been stressing wal-er ~
fixtures and appliances which conserve water such as special shawer ~
nozzles, low votume flushing toilets, and water efficient disn and cloth?s
washers. Other measures are automatic lawrl watering systems =rahich ~
irrigate at night, drip irrigation systPms for_ hedges, gard?ns, trees and
shrubs and natural law-irrigation ta*uiscaping instatlations.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
There will be a lang term oanrnitment of water from the Snokane A(T11fPC ta
service the hcxnPs, lawns, and gardens of the projert. The aquifer is a S
relatively high volume, fast moving aquifer with retiable recharge. The new
water demand would not cause any significant lowering of the local water
table.
3.8 Ground tiater Quality
4m
a. Existing Conditions
Ground water quality of the SpokanP Valley-Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer has ;
5een stud i ed by the Sookane County' s"208" Proj ect . Sa*npl i ng of g rourid wrater and surface water at selected locations throughout the aquifer on a .
variety of parameters has been completed. The synthesis of the ?-aw data is ~
u:zderway, and in thP near future, an interpretation of this data will be -
• available. Although no direct sam4ting of gcound water on the project sit-e
has taken place, several "208" Study we tls are locatxd in the immediate
vicinity. These caell locations and one surface water s&mple site are shoFAm
on the Water Sampling Locations Map, pag? 27 , 'I`hP Trentwcod Mayhew and
Trentwood Progress wells were sa*mpled, but not as often as same of thQ ~
other w+ells. The fotlaaing table s';-K7,as the ar ithmetic Tnean of "20$" Sti-idv
sa~nples of selectewi oarameters of these ~hree wells and the surface wat-er
sample location called Spokane River at Pi_nes.
?6
i
fORKEA SITE
AOUif£R BOUNDARY `
, ~1c PR06RESS
WELL ESL EY
. • i .
,
• ~11
.e .
, •
.
.
SPOKANE R/VER
t - 90
PINES ~
N
J
SPRA6Uf
~
' SUL L /VAN
AOUIfER BOUNDARY
INI1hGNIFU fNlilNFtNIN(, ~1I1N11pUt IIIIhIIlMW1M11111N /
WATER SAMPLING LOCATIONS
DEPTH SELECTIVE SAMPLING WELL Q
PRIVATE OR PURVEYOR WELL O
SURFACE SAMPLING POINT ❑
SOURCE : U.S G.S.
~
ARITi3ME'I'IC MEAN OF "208" STtJDY jA]ELLS
, r
Spo!{ane
River at
Parameter TrentwoocliKavhew Trentwoad Proqress Kaiser East4ate Pines
Temp.
deqree C 10.0 11.4 9.7 7.6 Conductivity
m/mhos/cm 417.5 335.4 398.8 74,3 ,
PH 6.8 6.9 6.7 6.7 ,
Chloride mq/L 2.9 2.3 21.0 .9 ~
Hardness mqjG 215.0 184.0 180.7 51.6 ,
Nitrate-N
No3 mq/L 4.2 2.6 2.6 .4 ,
Fecal Cotiforn 0 0 0 ,
No. of Samples 2 5 10 6
s
The closest downstream ;aquiferi depth selective "208" Study wetl would be
the 208 zrvin we11. t See Water Samplings 1=ations Map, page 27.1 Samples
were taken at varying depths in ttie aquifer. The follawing table shows ttie
arithmetic mean by depth for the "203" Irvin r+TeLt for the first year of
sa*npling. ~
.
28
0
~
"208" IRVIN WELL ARIT~'rIC MEAN BY DEP'I'H
i DFPTi 0 -2* -3* -6 -10* -12 -22 -25* -30* -48* -49* -SO
Temp. ~
Deg. C. 10.5 10.5 10,0 10.0 11.0 10.0 10.0 10.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Conduct.
m/mYos/
cm 282.0 300.0 263.0 272.0 298,0 272.5 276.3 300.0 300.0 290.0 300.0 273.5 ,
FH 6.9 6.7 6.5 6.7 6.9 6.8 6.7 6.9 6.7 6,7 6.8 6,7
~ Chlor ide
mg/L 2.2 1.1 2.1 2.2 1.3 1.8 1.7 1.2 1.1 1.2 1.4 1.7 ,
Hardnaess
nx~L 152.0 140.0 153.0 146.0 176.0 147.8 148.8 170.0 148.0 140.0 150.0 145.0
Nitrate
No3 mqjL 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.3 ,
• Fecal
Coliform 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,
* Only one sample taken at that depth.
~ Several other parameters have been analyzed by several different
laboratories (208, W.S,U., I.H.W., D.S.H.S., E.P.A., U.S.G,S.4. Chemical
analysis of various metals, Phenols, ootor, totat cotiform and dissolved
solids, floride and turbidity, to name a few, have been perfor.med. The U.
S. Geo logical Survey Open-File Report 77-829 Plate No. 10 irx3icates that
iron oolor, total dissolved solids, pherxols and nitrate have at least once
r exceeded chemical standards set t7y the E.P.A. for tYose particular
elements. For location of these wells, see Water Quality, page 30.
Several we lls receiving water from the Scokane VallPy-Rathrum Prairie
aquifer have exceeded chemical standards periodicatly, although these
samples oamprisa3 less than one-ha]_f of 1 percent of those sampies
analyzed for values exceeding established maximum contaminant levels for
~ those constituents. About 1.4 percent of the analyses for constituents
considered detximPntal to the aesthetic quality of water shawed values
exceeding the establis'.ed secondary levels.
Data fran the cm-qoing "208" Study an quality of the aquifer will be
interpreted shortly to give moxe comparative information and more detail.
i
•
29
•
SQNS°N ~ S I T E'\;b
' o
~
WELLESL£Y ~
0
:b
~
rRENT
.
~ SPOKANE RIVER
.
.
. ~ ~
. ~
.
"b 4
: ~ ~ tRENt ~ c
CITY LIMITS,,`/~:
~~N~~~~ ~ • s
.
w ■
o '
.
I - 90
M/SSION
Z! ~
~
BROA OWAY 1
~
~~...J ~
Ihl ANI)V1l 11II 1 NGINI f YINt.
+ d111N\IIII I IIII1% l11NWt1114 1111h 'OOF
0 0.1 02 aa os oe i
WATER QUALITY
Fe Iron CLR Color
TD5 Total dissolved sollds N03 Nltrate
PN Phenola
SOURCE, U S G. S
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M ~ ~ •
• •
~ •
~ b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
Grouund water quality may be compa+ctec3 from the follawing sources: (.11
waste water oollection treatrnent and disposal facilities, (21 stormwater
drainage system, and 131 use of cfiemicals.
~ Sewage waste water generated by the proposed project will, at least for ttie
short term, be handled by irydividual septic tanks and drainfietc3s. Soils on
the site have been varified and an individual septic tank with drainfield
for each lot has been approved 5y the Spokane County Heatth District.
It is estimated that the residents of the proposed oroject witl generate
! approximate ly 80,000 gallvns of waste water per day, which would be
disposed of by the drainfields and ultimately peroolated into tthe soil.
The waste water would then be processed by natural-soils systems. ThP
natural-soil system of the project site has 5een found to 5e acteptabte .
for the development of septic-tank systerns, with no limitations
~ because of slope. Soils systems are g?nerally very effective in removing
metal vontaminants such as zinc, oopper, 'nickel, cadmium and leac3. In
additian, the natural filtration prooess of soits rernoves bacteria and
viruses. Tt1e primary nutrients, such as phosphorous and nitrogen,• are not
ocmpletely removed froKn waste water by septic-tank c?rainfield system~s.
Nitrogen removal and phosphate removal are functions of physicat/chem?cat
• properties, uptake by oover cr_ops, and carefutly controlted drainfield
applications which optimize nutr ient reimval.
Storntwater drainage, as discussec3 in other parts of this EIS, will be
disposed of ori site through the use of catch basins and drywetls. No
provisions are made for surface water drainage treatment. It can be
expected that the storm water rwloff will oontain mimr annunts' of some
• ground water pollutants, such as petroleum based hydrocarbons, suspended
soils and imrganic salts. A prepanderance of these contaminates are
subject to substantial re*noval as the stormwater peraolates through ttie
soil aolumns above the gzounr3 water. The soil oolumm would he approximately 80 to ll0 feet thick on the site. Soit systems generally do
not retain anions iryeluding sulfate, chloride, nitrate and bicar.bonate.
~ These dissol.ved inorganic matter wi11 *mve through soils and possibly
iricrease potential for grounr? water cont-amination.
The use of chemicals most likely will occ,.'ur on the project site in the for.m
of fertilizers, pesticicles and herbicides for domestic and lawn and
garden care. 'I'-he quantities used in residential areas, shoulc3 not
• be used intensively enough to pose a threat to ground watPr quality.
To try to quantify the impacts of this development on the aquifez quality
would be extremety difficutt, if not futile. I'!ze "208" Watez Quatity
Management Program, being conducted by thp Spokane County in cooaeration
with the U.S.G.S., U. S. Environmentat Protection Agency and the
` State Dpoartnent of Eaology, has not to date provided any definite
oonclusions regarding recharge of the aquifer drainfield, storm water
31
f
`
~
effluent, or chemical use over the aquifer. It is anticipated that, in thP
near future, the "208" wi11 have a Cause and Effect report dealing with the
effect of urbanization on the aquifer.
c. Measures to Mitigate the Adverse Impacts •
~
The installation of drylim sewers woutd give the pcoposPd project the
alternative of connecting to a sewez system at a later date, if a sewering
Dlan for the Spokane Vattey was adopted; or devetopment of an on-site
treatrnent facility, if it is more adventago-ous. The ground water impact
could also be mitigated by reducing the density of the project, thereby
reducing the votume of surface and waste water that must 5e disposed of in ~
subsurface systems. This would potentiatly reduce the votume of
contaminates that must be controlled, treatecl and/or disposed of on the
surface above the aquifer. Lawering the density of the project, txxwever,
may work against the ultimate solution to the problem of ground water
oontamination. At a lawer density, alternative waste water systems per
unit costs increasP and beaxne econamically unfeasible. •
A number of ineasures are availahle to mitigate the impacts of aontaminants
carried in surface water rumoff or ground water quality. The acoeptability
and effectiveness of these measures have not been demanstrated because of
their lack of wide spread use. Sediment basins can be used to settle out
a large portion of the suspended soils in surface runoff. Sedim?nt basins +
are not effective in controlling soluble inorganic salts. Oit and grease
separators can be used to remove petroleum products From surface runoff.
These separators have been only moderately effectivP and should be limited
in use to areas where likelihood of grease or fuet-oil spilt is probable.
d. Unvoidable Adverse Irnpacts ~
The possibitity that effluent generated by the proposat wi11 reach the
ground water of the Spo!cane Valley-Rathdrum Pr_airie aquifer cannot be ruled
out. The extent or magnitude of this contamiration is unkwqn at this time,
and is the subject of several vn-going stcdies.
3.9 Public Water Supplies ~
a. Existing Environmental Conditions
The proposal lies within the servioe area of Trentwood Irrigatian
District. There is a high votume well immediately adjacent to thP proposed ~
plat at Wellesley and Progress Road. Water quatity for that we ll is
exoellAnt.
32 .a
•
• . • ~ ~ ~ ~
• A ~ ~
,
.
0
~
~
~
~
0
,
.
~ ~ .
3y o
:
00 ~ ~ .
0
~ A y
0 ~
ti
W o o
.
n Q
a n
o ~
y O ~b
y 3~~0
5y
. ,
. • • ~
, • • ' ,r.,,
~ L . 0 100 300 S
ICE LOC~►''CaN ~ 50 ~o , FEET
WSOURCE: AT E RSE R V
TRENTW000 WATER DIS7RIC7 '
s
a
b. Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
The proposat oould create a maximum sumnertime daily demand of 2,000
gallons per tot or 532,000 gatlons per day. Whettier or_ not additional
gumping would be required is not yet kwan, but the plat will be supplied .
with mains and hydrants adequate for damestic and fire protection purposes.
- Atl improvements within the plat will oonform to standards required of
Washington State Public Watec Systems.
c. Measures to Mi.tigate Adv2rse Impacts
None •
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
None
4. Flora •
4.1 Numbers or Diversity of Species
a. Existing Conditions
The site is 91 acres of cleared land which is cuttivated with agricultural
•
crops that include wheat, barley or hay.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Actian
Development of the site as proposed will result in the permanent disruption
of the current agricultural use of the site. The existing crops will be ~
reptaced with residential lawns, shrubs, trees, floaers a-nd vegetables.
The nature and extent of the tandscaping will be up to the new property
awners in the development.
c. Measures to Mitigate Ac3verse Imnacts
,r
The removal of agricultural crops from the site will, in part, be
oo, ensated for by the tandscaping that will be introduced with the proposecl
development. The loss of agricultural production cannot be completely
mitigated except by the introduction of simitar cropland elsewhere.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts ~
Ttp- permanent removat of agricultural crops f rom the site.
~
34
•
~ 4.2 Unique SpPcies
a. Existing Conditians
There are not kmwn rr) 'ae any unique or rare species of flora on the site
at present.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
None
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
?Vone
d. Unavoidable Ar3verse Imgacts
None
•
4.3 Barr iers and/or Corr idors
N/A
4.4 Agricu Ltural Crops
•
a. Existing Corxditions
The site consists of 91 acres of ailtivatecl farmtand with crops which
i nclude wheat, bar ley or hay. 'th i s f armland has been d=_,s ignated as pr ime
farmland according to the Soil Canservatian Service.
•
'I'►ie prime agricultural s+oils are of the Garrison Series with 0 to 5 percent
slopes. ; See page 101 .
b. The Probable Lnpact of the Proposed Action
The proposed residentiat development will oonvert 91 acres of cropland into
a single family residential sw5di-visian.
c. Measures to MitigatP Adverse Impacts
Back-yard gardens can prorauce a fair alrount of produce. Such gardAns will,
hawever, only minimize the potential long-range reduction of fooc3 crops on
the Summer f i eld land.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The proposed develorment witt result in a small locat toss in nroduction
, potential for hay and gr_ain czops.
35
5. Fauna
5.1 Numbers or Diversity of Species
a. Existing Conditions
The wildtife population on thP site can be categorizec7 into resident and ~
migratory species. Resident species inctude field mice, moles, whit2-tailed
jack rabbits, ground squirrel.s, big brown bats, AlmPrican robins, starlings,
house sparraas, red-tailed hawks, California valley quail, ring-neckPd
pheasant, and ruffled grouse. Migratory spncies that may occrasionatty be
found on site inctucle the western white-tait deer, coyote, bobcat, feral
dogs, grourd squirrels, striped skunks, yellaw-bellied narmots, white-
tailed jack rabbits, snawshoe hare, hawks, quail, grouse, doves arld
pheasants.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposecl Action
The construction of the development will result in the germanent
d isruptian o f habitat For the lar ger an imals .The smaller an imal.s may be
forced to relocate fram the site but should remain in the area. The bird
populatians on-site wilt be depenr3ent upon severat factors. The reduction
of rodents arxd insects will affect birds of pcey which utitize these
sources of food, such as owls and hawks. The project may encourage
species such as sang birds, snarraws, and the robin, which may outstrip
other species of birds for food supQly, habitat and nesting sites.
The project will also result in the introduction of a nwber of household
pets.
c. Nieasures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
The retention of as much natural vegetation as possible on the property
lying northeast of the site and on the one-acre tracts witl preservP habitat
for some of the sma.ller animals and birds. Lanr-lscaping and plantirx3s of
trees and shrubs will enoourage certain species of fauna to ca-exist with
man.
S
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The project will resultin a decrease in the number and/or diversity of
wildlife that inhabit the area.
36
,
5.2 Unique Species
a. Existiryg Conditicns
Consultatian with the lqashington State Department of Game revealed no kcryqn
unique, rare, or Pndangered species currently using the site.
►0 b. The Probable Impact of the Propased Action
None
c. Measures to Mitigate Ac3verse Imtpacts
1 0 None -
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
None
I~ 5.3 Bar.riers and/or Corridors N/A
5.4 Fish or tidild_life Habitat N/A
o. Noise
a. Existing Conditions
Noise in any given area is the product of two types of sources: ;l► am-
bient mise which is associated with the overall effect of long-term roise-
producing activities, and ; 21 identifiable noise produced by soecif ic
• sources.
1 The primary noise generated in the vicinity of the site is identifiable
noise produced by vPhieular traffic along 'rIe llesley Avenue, Progress Road
and For ker Road and by the various activities associated with Trentwood
Elementary arycl East Valley Junior High Schools. The major source of mise
is f rom veh icular kraff ic.
~
Since the property in questian is vacant, m significant noise is present.ly
gPneratec7 f ram the site.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposeci Action
~ The noise impacts of the project witl be r.elated to construction, vehicular
traffic, generat human activity, and minor mechanicat noise.
During the construction of the project, mise witl 5e generated by
equipment used for land d?velopment, road constcuction, and the buil_ding
of st4ructures. Equipment used for tihe :Land development witl 5e used to
~ build roads, for excavatian, and for the digging of trenches for watez,
septic tanlcs or sewertines, and utility lines.
37
go
~
r~
It should be noted that tPmporary sounds resulting fram construction
activities are exempt fro:n the State of Washington noise standards.
Increased vehicutar traffic during the operational phase of ttie project
will cause a substantial nnise tevel increase on the site. It should hP i~
pointed out, hawever, that noise generated by motor vehicles operating on
public r ight-of-ways *ahich conforms to the required Washington State noise
emission levets of WAC-173-02 are deened legal. It is not expectec3 that
any of the residences within Sumerfield East will be exposed to
tzaffic-induced noise exceeding the Washington State standards of 65 dBA
for a prolanged period of time. The increase in human activity,
mechanical roise, and vehicular traffic will combine to create noise
levels exceeding that currently existing, but the noise impact shQUld not
be significant.
c. rieasures to Mitigate Ac3verse Inpacts
The ircrease in noise levels f rom thP construction operatians taill be
mitigated in several ways which inctude: the distance of construction
activities f rom existing residences; the temporary nature of thp- activities;
the limitation of construction activities to normal t7:00 a.m, to 6:00 p.m.$
working hours; and the noise buffering provided by the insutated watls of
daellings.
Increased vehiailar traffic related noise tevels can be mitigated by the
use of property operating mufflers arxl quieting devices, and shutting off
of idling equipment. As previously mentioned, WAC-173-62 estabtishes
maximum noise levels for motor vehicles.
The traffic-generated noise will be most notiaeable during normal business
hours and should p?ak at 7:30 to 9:00 a.m. anl Fron 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.
These time factors will tend to restrict noise intrusions to wo_*king
hours, thus limiting the duration of roise-generation periods.
d. Unavoidable Ad-vezse Inpacts ~
Iricreased noise tevels generated during the constructian ohase of the
projec t and additional increases f rom vehicutar traffic during the
operaticma.l phase wil.l create unavoida5le impacts, but will not exceed State
and Federal standards.
~
38 ~
~
s .
:
7. Liqht and Glare
a. Existing Conditions
There are no sources of light or glare on the site. Alcmg t-he periphery of
~ the site are street lights, and secvrity lighting at Trentwood ElemPntary
and East VaLley Junior High Schools.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
The project wilt require artificial light, and generated 5y the
~ follawing: stzeet lighting to increase night visibility anc3 to reduce
dr iving ha zards; inter ior and exter ior tighting for each single-family
residence. Autarrobiles and truck lights during nighttime driving wilt
will create additiona.l light and glare.
~ c. Measures tA Mitigate Adverse Impacts
The use of lvw intensity street lighting, which is required to meet thP
approval of the Spokane County Engineers, will mitigate some of the iffpact.
Care ful plann ing along with arch itecturat coord ination and generous use of
~ landscaping (i.e., trees and shrubst will help to reduce the impacts of
~ light and glare. Reduction of nuisance glare at "T" intersections by
adjustrnent of lot tines can reduce glare from headlights.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
/ The project will result in increases in .light and g lare on the project
~ site.
8. Land Use
a. Existing Conditions
The proposed project site ties within Spokane County and its planning and
zoning jurisdictian. T'he site is presently cultivated with crops that
imlude wheat, barley or hay.
The existing land uses in the vicinity of the proDOSed dPveloomnt are
varied, as shawn on the Land Use Map on page 40. The land uses north of
~ the site include: the sonneville PcFAaer Admi-nistration Pmnr Lines,
scattered single-family resic3ences and parcels along thP hitlside presently
under cultivation.
The land uses south of the site inctude: Trentwood. Elem?ntary School,
single--family residences within King Subdivisian ;average lot size 10,000
~ square feeto and the Valley Baptist Church. Lying southeast of the sir_e
39
~
~ ~rn
`•,t` k~ t ~`~k~a
~'i ~pf -
~ V ♦ /j _ ~ ~ ~
R~' q ~ ■
~p y •
'O ■
M -
~ OwArER
TANX
<tl~ ~
: 4xyw~;~'
•
~
n<
N
~
D
■ • ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ • ~ y EAST YALLEY 0r
; . ~ tiy; U•i ~~a~~, i~ JR. HIGH ~mJ
y~ ii :uC'IL~7iL'I~! 1 1
TRENTW00 a
~ ~ : ;;~t<s ,r ~ ~ n. = ELEMENT
~i ~ • 1 ~ ~iii ~ !t I' 1" ~
C> SCHOOL
~ya4
-I
+ . ~ . .
j
~ VACANT ,
M L VACANT ~T
VACANT
:::w :•~;.:,:I:},;;,;,;;,;,;,
: ~
. . . . . . . . •::i :
• y:... X.,....... .
` J ~~ti~'~~
1 I 1 ' : •.!Y"'"'`r'r~1.1,~ . . . ~ . .
/ l ~~.•t : ~ VACANT Dn
G . F': . . . f . . VAC ANT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ _ V
`
VACANT VACANT VAGANT v
VACANT
LAND USE
RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISON f~~~~•~~~ CULTIVATED ~
TRUCK FARM ~ ALFALFA ~ -
PASTURE
SOURCE; SPOKANE COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION CROPS
~
~
~
are single-family residences and to the southtAest are single-family
residPnces and vacant property.
The land uses east of the site include: East Vatley Junior High, (East
Valley High Schcol is located just east of Sultivan Road); scattered
~ single family residences; Trentwood Irrigation District pump and pump
house; water tank and scattered parcels presently under cultivation.
The land uses west of the site include: parcels presently used for truck
farming and for pasture; single-family residPnces within Swan Acres
Subdivision, Pare Additian, Curry One Addition and Alexandar Suhdivision,
S ; average lot sizes range frcxn 10,000 sq. feet to 17,000 sq, feet► ; ard
scattered suburban residences.
The site currently has the agricultural zone ctassification ;A+ adoioted
April 24, 1942, as shawn on ttie Zoning Map on page 42. The agricultural
zcne is a land use classif ication designating an area suitable foc farming
~ and agricultural pursuits, including cuttivation of tand, fruit raising,
truck farming, livestock oroductian, dairying, poultry raising, and
forestry. Commercial and industria.l activities unrelated to agriculture are
proh ib ited .
The properties lying north and east of the site have the agricultural zone
~ classificatian ;A► and the properties to the south and west have the
agricultural ( A► , agricultural suburban ; ASI, and the singte-family
residential ; R-ll zone classifications.
The "Generalized Cvmprehensive Plan, Spokane Metropolitan Area" (last
revised and approver-I on October 22, 19681 designates the project site for
~ residentiat neighborrood use.
The site was originally subdivided in the early 1900's as Bonnie LAa Acre
Tracts, but was vacated by the Spokane Gounty 3oard of Commissioners
of Spokane on December 1, 1914.
~ b. The Probable L~npact of the Proposed Action
Tte proposed project is a planned residentiat clevelopment of approximatety
91 acres consisting of 208 lots with a gross dPnsity of 2.9 lots per gross
acre. Lot sizes will vaty a little, but a typical lot will have SO feet of
public road frontage and a total of 10,000 sq, feet of area. In ac3dition,
~ there will be three one-acre suburban tracts f ronti ng on For ker Road.
The project will result in a change in tand use of the site from vacant and
cultivated agricultural land into a singte-family residentiat developnent.
The density of the proposed project is aonAatible with the surrounding
residentiat uses as welt as ar,roved sdodivisions within the area.
~
41
1~
p0
~0
~EA
FpP
/
0
~
~
SiTE :
~
~
0 r
a ;
z
~
N ~
WEL L ESL EY AVf.
- - -
0
~;r+'*+
. ~
. ~ : .:.:•.S . ir~.
~ . . . .
, ~ . . . . : : : : . ~
. •
~ 1~' . ~ : : ~•:::.•.0
.
'
• Z~ • . . ' i
. ~ ~
: ~ ~ i O~iJd.• ~ . .
i :'i : ~ • •i • ~ . ~
E:• i~~♦ ~ii~ .
i~i~i~iii:i• ~i~~~~~i~~.~• i •
~ ~ ~ ~iiii • ~ : ~i i~ i
• ♦:~i• if•
• ~ ~ iiii. • . • ~ ~ ~ ~i
~ iiii • i i ~ i ,
cy(
, . `
,
~ a k
I~I~NI)PUIfI~If~~~1~IfNltit~ . ~ 'O'•x,4~ qp,,µ~~ Y ° ~ _ y
• ~ , . r $ "k'Nr~ pr~ `+uh'~.,p~ ~,r ~ d
,
~111h~IM11111~~~ii/W~M~II~1~ ~
-ZC]NING MAP
COMMERCIAL ZONE
AGRICULTURAI ZONE M ~ AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN ZONE
SINGIE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE 'wv~* ~MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBlfRBAN ZONE lEgM
RESTRICTED RESIDENTIAL ZONE EM RESIDEN7IAL M081L HOME ZONE M ~
' SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSiON MANUFACTURING 20NE ~
• ~ ~ ~
~
'I'he 25 acre parcel located north of the site and used for BPA naver lines
and required easements, may also 5p- used as a site for a oombination sewage
treatment plant and open space area, if such a sewage treatment facility is
required by the Spokane County Healtln District. This property has not bePn
ircluded as part of the Su~mnerfield East project, but is within the
sponsor's ownership. BPA pawer tine easement restricts the uses permitted
on this 25 acre garoel. A copy of the Bonneville Pamrer Administration Pawer
- Line .;asements can be found on page 83, Appendix "C".
c. Mcasures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
Poten'tial adverse land use impacts will be mitigated by the establishment
of an orderly oattern of development and project phasing. In ac3dition,
an Architectural Control Conmittee may be used by the project sponsor and
tAgether with restrictive oovenants, the two will help to maintain a
higher degree of quatity and integrity throughout the projact.
The imact of growth in the area should not 5e considered a reegative
_ impact unless graath is permitted to proceed in a random, undirectec7
fashion. Development patterns can be controtled by thP apptication of
aontrols available in planning, zaning, and subdivision regulatians. In
additicn, the Caunty Ptanning Staff and Planning Comrnission review and
approval process provide guidance for an orderly pattern of development.
d. Unavoidable Adverse I,-npacts
Thase who desire to maintain the sa.te in its present rurat state may view
the proposed land use as an unavoidable adverse im,,~act.
9, Natural Resources
9.1 Rate of Use
a. Existing Conditians
The site is currently used in the productivn and cuttiva~ion of wheat,
barley or hay. The Prime Agricultural are ttie anly apparent natural re-
sources of significance on the site at the present time.
b. The Probable Lmpact of the Proposed Action
The permanent disruption of the current agricuttural use of the site will
be the inost significant impact on exzsting natural resources.
During the constructian phase of the project, naturat resources will be
consumed, including the energy resources directly and zndirectly used by
construction activities and thP natural resourcp-s utilized as -building
materials.
Uatural resources will oontinue to be consumed after construc*_ion and
include energy in the form of fossil fuels fvr tr.ansportation, as well as
electricity for heating.
43
. J
l
C. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
The consumption of n:aturat resources during the construction and occunancy
phases of the project will be kept to a minimum through the use of a
variety of energy and other conservation techniques which ate becoming
widely acxepted and practiced by builders and the gPneral public.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The proposed project will vonsume natural resoutces during the constructian
and occupancy phases.
9.2 Nonzenewable Resources
N/A '
10. Risk of Explosion or Hazardous Emissions
N/A .
44
Elements of the Human Environment
1. Eopulation
a. Existing Conditions
The site is located in the Spokane Vattey, the major gr.owth area of thP
Spokane Metrolpolitan Area. Since 1950, grawth in the Siookane Valley has
significantly outpaced groRath in the rest of the county, as shoNan in the
table belaa.
POPCTLATIOIV GR}:M IN THE .raPOWE ARED,
1950 1960 1970 1976
Total rounty 221,561 278,333 287,487 330,933
% ircrease 34 25 3 15
Metropolitan
Arrea . 20O, 900 254 , 521 266 , 340 295,000
$ increase 38 25 4 11
Spokane Cc}unty 161, 721 181, 603 170 , 516 174,500
$ increase 32 12 -6 2
East Area 28,383 47,373 57,896 75,015
% increase 76 56 22.2 30
Annua t Av2rage
Increase
East Area 7.6 6.6 2.2 5.0
Source: The Spokane Area Developrnent t',ouncil
The growth in the caounty's east area over the last three decades appears
to have been due in part tn the influx of people in the Pacific LNorthwest
and partly due to this area's suburbanization. This g rawth in the Spokane
Valley is exgectp-d to continue at a fairly rapid rate in the years ahear3.
The C-ensus of Population and Housing Data identifies the site as being
located within Census Tract 114. The population growth within Census
Tract 114 has been extremely rapid in the past fR,a years. Fram 1971 to
1976, the tract's gopulation increased from 3,020 to 31831 ;21 vercenti.
P+opulation projections for Spokane County have been preparec? by the
Spokane County Planning Department and the Spokane Area Devetopment
Courlcil for Lhe period fram 1980 to the year 2000 in five-yAat increments.
High, rtedium, and low populafiian estimates have been provided in 'x-)th
forecasts, as shawn in the following table. Note that the est;Jnated
poputat ion o f the ^ounty in 1976 exceedec3 even the h igh ponulat ion
estimates for thA year 1980 due to the ravid growth during the past
fed y2ars. . '
45
POPULATIQV P?~7EC.'TIONS FOR SPOKA.NE COUNI'Y
Projection by 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2020
Spok ane County
Planning Dept.
(19741
High 323 , 000 342 , 000 366,000 385 , 000 408 , 000
$ increase 6.3 5.9 7.0 5.5 5.7
Medium 318,000 334,000 352,000 369,000 385,000
$ increase 6.3 5.0 5.4 4.8 4.6
Low 313,000 326,000 338,000 352,000 354,000
% increase 5.9 4.1 3.7 4.1 3.4
Spokane Area
IIevelopment
Counc it (19751
High 322 , 200 350 , 700 378 , 500 401-3, 200 433 , 200 530,100
% increase 8.1 8,8 7.9 7.3 6.6 24.4
Med ium 309 , 800 329 , 900 350 , 700 370 , 400 391, 000 470 , 800
$ increase 3.9 6.5 6.3 5.6 5.6 20.4
Law 296,500 301,800 308,500 315,200 321,300 345,900
$ increase -0.5 1.8 2.2 2.2 1.9 7.7
Source: Spokane County Planning Department, Spokane Area Development Council
b. The Probable Inpact of 'Che Proposed Action
The proposed project oontenplates 268 residences which will irr_rease the
area's populatian 5ase. To get Fram th is nuanber to an est imate of
resident population, it is necessary to estimate the average household
size. Using the factors from Evaluatinq Econamic Impact, publis:ied by the
California OffiQe of Planning and Research, 1977, which suggests the use
of 3.5 persons per single-family dwelting, Summerfield Fast will result in
a resic7ent poFulation projection of 938 oeople when fully developed.
c. Measures tA Mitigate Adverse Impacts
Ttp- increased poputation impact of this pcoject ran be mitigatp-d by
careful ptanning and the development and implementation of land usz
policies and regulations.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Even with the development and implementation of land use pol.icies and
regul3tions, a population increase in this area will be considerer3 by some
to be an unavoidabte and adverse impact.
. 46
2. Economics
a. Existing Conditions
Aocording to the Spokane County Assessor's tax records, the ptoperty
has a 1977 assessed value of $55,950.00, and tti-m 1977 real estate taxes are
listed as $1,407.93 at a millage rate of $23.10 per thousand. A breakr-lown
of the property tax by recipient fotlaws: •
Recipient Millaqe Rate
State 4.821
CAUnty 1.963
County Road FurO 2.167
County Librar y Fund .487
School District No. 361 11.034
Fire District No. 1 2.634
TOTAL 23.10
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
The construction phase of the project will require e xpenditures for
payrolls arx3 for iu-he purchase of materiats, supolies, and services.
The total projected direct expenditures for labor and materials for tne
dzvelopment are estimated at approximately $15,946,000.00. Included in
this projectian are the costs of engineer ing design and environmentat
studies, structures, streets,• lot improvemPnts, and utilities. A variety
of accessory costs are not ircluded: setling costs, sales taxes, reat
estate excise taxes, land costs, loan fees, interest, Ptc.
A secondary economi.c impact would be • the expenr3 itutes f or mater iats,
supQlies, and services, due to the increases in payrolls for employees of
the firms producing the goods and services.
It is projected that when the da-velopment is oampleted, the assessed
taxable vatue of the land anc3 structu*es for the 91 acres of Sunmerfield
East will have increased to $16,750,000.00 !1978 dotlarst. (The assumptions
used to generate this estimate have been based on an average combination
lot-house market value of $62,500.001.
c. Measures to Mitigate Ac3verse Impacts
None
d. Unavoidable Ac3vers? Impacts
None
47 -
!
t
3. Housinq ,
a. Existing Canditions .
As mentioned in the i.~oputation review, the Spokane Vatley is an area of
significant grvFw*-h. The north, south and east portions of the Valley are ,
currently experiencing rapid grawth in the £orm of housing starts -.rhich t
are a result of new subdivision development. Ni
,
The site is located within Census Tract 114. 'I`he 1970 Census of ~
Population and Housing Data indir-ates that to 5P a total of 1,042. The
1976 data indicates a total of 1,235 for Census Tract 114, a 15 percent ~
n
increase over t►e 1970 total. ,
b. Thc Probable Impact of the Proposed Action ~
The suburban housing market in the Spokane area has been strong for the ;
past three years and it is expected to continue strong in the foreseeable '
future. The National Association of Home Builders predicts that 2,440 ~
new homes will be constructed in Spokane Gounty, 30 percent belaw ~
their 1977 productian figure of 3,452 new homes. SL=erfield East has :
been proposed in respmse to the existing and the anticipated
denands, and wilt add 268 single-family &.aellings to the local market. ,
The selling prioe for thP .lots within the pr_oposAci development will range S
in prioe fram $8,000 to $10,000 •,ahich, in tuzn, wil1 generate housing which :
will range in cost fram $40,000 to $85,000. Ta'cing inflation into account,
the proposed project appears to be consistent with the pxisting housing in
the area, in terms of the typA and cost.
c. Measures ta Mitigate Adverse Imparts
Project phasing of approximately 44 new residentiat units per year taill
tend to ease the impact of Summerfield East on the area's housing market.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
None
.
;
48
0
4, Transportation/Circulation
4.1 Vehiailar Transportation Generated
a. Ex isting Cond it.ions
Trent Avenue, Pines Road, and Sull.ivan Road are thP major arteriats
servicing the area. Wellesley Avenue is also considered a secondary
arterial. The average claily traffic counts are shaam on page 50.
There is no vehicular traffic generated by the site at present. T'he
surrounding area also generates nndest vo.lumes of trafFic to adjacent
hanesites and the three schools nearby.
b. The Probable Impa+ct of the Proposed Actiaz
The expected maximun traffic volume of a 258 lot subdivision can be
calculated using an average of 8 trips per day per household. This would
create about 2,144 one-;,aay vehicle trips per day.
c. Measures to :Kitigate Adverse Impacts
The development of transit to city and emplayment centers woutd mitigate
additional generated traffic, but generatly these systems have been
poor ly supported. Ca!-pooli ng could a tso have a limi tec3 e f f ect .
Pedestrian access to local schools, which are all within walking
di.stance, will atso reduce trip requirements for sczool-related
activities.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Most of the above mitigating measures have nPVer proven to be very
effective. Therefore, the increased impacts due to traffic may be
considered unavoidable.
4.2 Parking Facilities
, iV/A
4.3 Transportation Systems
a. Existing Corx3itions
The e xist i ng 11--r. anspor tat ion systems are timi ted to pr iva`e ty owmp-d veh icles ,
since ro buses or railways service the project area. The closest bus
servioe is a twice daily route to the Industrial Park down Trent Avenue.
The road net,iorks in 'Che area provide excaellPnt aceess for in&lividuals.to
and fro:n their homes.
49
,
A. D.T. s A.D.IT. $
1 9, 3670
I. 2840 10, 2120
2• 1379 II. 4420 ,
3. 919 12, 10300
4. 3566 13. I1580
5. 2394 r2 14, 8300
6. 1360 ~ 1978 Counts
7. 2089 ~
8. 2442 f 3 ' .
1977 Counts
~ SIT ~
2 ' 4
5
6 T -4. WELLESLEY
'
__j ~ -~e ~ F> A-/
9 ~ I
~ -1o
~ L ~ (I } TRENT
~14
1 ~
2-/ 13
h
C
r
~
~
n
2
SPOKANE R/VfR
OKANE
~ErnmI%I VhllYM II II I NIANtt0.W(, IIRIVER
\ AinMINII IIMinNNIN~IIUS ~ AV''ERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC COUNT
SOURCE : SPOKANE COUNTY PLAN COMMISSION
b. The Probable Z:rVa+ct of the Proposed Action
The propo6al would add severat hurx3red tr ips per day to Wellesley Avenue,
Sullivan Road, Pines Road, Trent, I-90, etc. Present shopping cp-nters
- taould be pr imar ily Univers i ty C ity and Downtown Spokane. There are,
hawever, two new shopoing centers being proposed. One would be at Broadway
Avenue and Sutlivan Road and the other would be at I-90 and Liberty Lake
Drive. Neither pzoposal has been anproved by the Gounty Commissioners to
date, but either one would certainly change s'rovping destinations for
area residPnts. The quality of primary and secondary roa,ds to service
the plat is excetlent, and all roads have ample capacity for the 10
exnected influx.
c. Measures to -mitigate the Provosed Action
Access to the elenentary school has been provided which will r:utt: school
- related vehicle trips. Efforts are being continued to improve the Spokane
Transit System arx3 increase ridership. Whether or nat bus service will be
extended to this area is a matter of economics and public acceptance.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
- There will, even with the best street design, be increased accident
potential because of the increased traffic levels.
4.4 Movement/Circulatian of People or Goods
a. Existing Conditions
Present movement of goods and peoale is governed by the road network
describPd in 3.3 of this document.
b. Probable Impwt of the Proposed Actian
T5e movement and circulation patterns should remain the same, but whuld
have a moderate increase in activity.
c. Measures tA Mitigate Adverse Impacts
See 3,3 of this document.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
' See 3.3 of this document,
4.5 Waterborne, Rail and Air Traffic
N/A
51
4.6 Traffic Hazards ,
a. Existing Conditions
There are no traffic hazards on site at otesent sircP it is unc3eveloped.
Servicing arterials are w+ell signed, tighted or chanrp-lized for traffic
oont ro 1. • -
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Actian
On site, the generation of vehicular traffic fram residences would create
traffic hazards. Off site, increased traffic woutd atso increase traffic
hazards.
c. Measures to Mitigate the Adverse Impacts
Good design aids in reducing traffic hazards. In this case, effort has .
been made on street layouts to disoourage high-speec3 through traffic in
residential areas. Gentle curves and c..ul-de-sacs are emphasized for this .
reason. It is recomended that residentiat streets not be excessively wide
for the same reason. "Stop" and "Yield" signs should be provided where
appropriate. The provisiQn for sidewatks could rnitigate potentia.l pedes-
trian and vehicular traffic hazards. Four separate accesses have been
provided w-hich limit access on arterials. TAts alang Wellesley and
Progress Road have rear yards Facing those roads which limit access to the
tao streets provided. AQCess to the elemP~tary school has top-en provided
in three locations permitting acoess by pedestrian grade school children
without having to walk alcng We11esley Avenue or Progress Road.
If traffic levels beeome sufficiently high at Evergreen Road and Trent
Avenue in the future, some channelizatian'may be required for safer
turning and crossing.
a . Unavoida5le Adverse Impacts
Increased exposure to traffic accidents 5ecause of increased volume of
traffic.
5. Public Services
5.1 Fire
a. Ekisting Conditions
The proposal is located within Fire District No. 1 of Spokane CountX.
The nearest fire station is located on the cor_ner of Broadway and Su_1livan
Roads arproximately 2 3J4 miles south of the proposal. Rnsnonse tirnp- is
estimated to be apQroximately 3 1/2 to 4 minutes. T'Lle station is manned
by afull-time staff and equipped with a 1,250 g.p.m. pumper ancl a 1,000
g.p.m, reserve pumper. 52
.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
~ Fire District No. 1 will ultimatety be resnonsible for the fire protec-
tion of approx unately 268 new residential units. It is not anticipated
that add itional staff or equipment wil.l be needed as a result of the
project. The cumulative impact, hawever, of residentiat grawth within
the Fire District baundaries may require additional staff and equipment
• in the future.
The proposal would not gose any unusuat fire hazards and, therefore,
will not require special fire-fighting equipnent.
c. Measures to Mitigate Ac3verse Impacts
~ Mitigatian of fire potential on the site can bo-z achieved in several ways
which inctude:
Use of non-combustible mater iats where possible;
Use of smke detection devices;
Project design that will f acilitate fire vehicle access;
• The extension of water mains and hydrants which witl be subject to
requirements by Fire Distcict No. 1;
Spokane Suildtng and Fire Codes as they pertain to life and firP
safety;
Lot sizes and building setbacks will minimize possibility of
conflagration.
S Property taxes pcovide a source of revenue which reduce additionat oosts
for tye extension of fire protectian. d. Unavoida5le Advexse Impacts
Increase in the possibility af fire on the site which will create
~ add i tional service requi rements i n Fi re D i-str ict No, l.
5.2 Police
a. Existing Conditians
~ Laa enforcement servioes are prvvided by the Spokane County Sheriff's
Departrnent. The Sheriff's Depart►ent operates a substatian located at
10319 Sprague Avenue, approximately five miles to thP sout-hwest corner of
the site. According to Department officiats, it is within a resvonse and
serviae area whieh is patrolled, although the Sheriff's staff is unclec
manned at .75 officers per 1,000 population.
~
~ 53
~ '
!
i
i
;
i
I
The Washington State Patrol provides tzaffic enforcPment and back-up .
serviaes in the area. F'
~
,
b. Txhe Probable Irnpact of the Proposp-d Action !r
►
The proposal will result in iracreases in the servioe requireme-nts of ~
local law enforcement agencies.
c. Measures to Mitigate the Proposed Action ~
~Use of crime prevention techniques such as tighting, structure design, and q
landscaping, will he lp reduce the need f_or laa en forcement on the s i te .
In addition, adequate access, logicat extension of street names, where ~
possible; and easil_y readable addresses will reduce respmse time. ~
Law enforoement service increases reguired bv the devPlopsnent would be
mitigated by thp- addition in tax revenups to Spokane County. i
~
d. Unavoidable Adverse I,-Vacts ~
f
The proposal will result in an increase in law enforeement services. ~
x
~
5.3 Schools
"e
a. Existing Conditians ~
:
G
The proposal is located in the East Valley School District tNo. 361. The ~
district has e:cperienced a 24 percent increase in enroli.ment fram 1970 to `
1977. Presently, the East Valley Distr ict operates three elpmentary
schools, one junior high school and one high school. The East Valley
District also has a newly formec~ cammittPe to identify needs, and Dlan
for facilities eV.ansion. An intervie°w with the East Valley Schoot r
District facility planner revealed that a new elementary school is being
constructed in the Otis Orchards area. This school would be ready
January, 1979. A new junior high is atso under construction in Otis
Orcharcis and is scheduli--i to be opp-n in Septp-nber, , 1979. Upon the
opening of these two schools, the enrollmPnts given in the following
table will be reduced, as approximately half of the junior high students
will attend the new facility at Otis Orc`iards and ap4roximatety 25 `
elemPntary students will attencl the new elem?ntary school in the Otis
Orchards area. The three schaols impactecl by the project are all within
walking distance of the proposat. The existing enrollments and capacit•j
are shawm on t-he follvwing page. ,
,
54
SCHOOLS INNSPACTED BY PRQ7ECT
School Addrpss Grades Ehrol.tment Capacity
Trentwood
Elenentary E. 14741 Wellesley K-6 600 000
East Valley
Junior High N. 4920 Progress RA. 7-9 702 800
East Valley
High E. 1511 tnleltesley 10-12 682 900
_ A bond issue is currentll before the voters which would provide incame
for the purchase of two elementary school sites and a high schocl site.
Th is bond issue was voted down i n the October pr zmar y and wi 11 be
submitted again in the NovembPr election.
b. The Probable Lmpact of the Proposed Actian
The proposal would add additianat school-age children to the East Valtey
School system. The maximum number of students generated by t-he proposal
would be approximately 536. Assuming stud?nt populations woutd be
equally distributed in age, it woulc3 mean 268 additional elempntary
students, 134 jumior h ign students,and 134 h igh school stLAents.
It is not antieipated t5at additional students would 'nave to be busseci to
and from schools because of the close pr_oximity to schools. Hawever,
increases may cause short term tussing andjor rec7istricting of school
bou.*~dar ies.
The increased student population ~raoutd have its greatest effec*_ on the
elementary school, which would not cvrrently be able to harLd1e the
increase. The junior high, with the planned opening of the new junior
high, tgould have available capacity to hanc?le increases. 'I'he high
school would also' have availabi e capacity to handte ircreases. Because
oF the Lapid grawth in thp area, thesP availahle capacities c%'Ould most
li ke_ly be short tivend.
c. Measures to Mitigate AdversP Impacts
Growth in the school d istr ict can most read ily be acco:nmodated by prooer _
planning. The newly formed a.xnnittep- on facilities will perforTn such a
function. School taxes for operatian and maintenance are provided -by
spraeial levies and property taxes. The proposal, upon oom.pletion, wnulcl
generate more tax dollars per year to help mitigate increased student
population impacts. Te:nporary classraoms may bp- moved between schools
as a temporary relief ineasure until permanPnt classrooins are built. A
declining birth rate will atso slow the need for new classraxns.
55
!
Project phasing will also reduce unpacts over the np-xt six y?ars, so
planning ot facitities will have greater lead time.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
Increases in stulent Fopulation within the East Vatlev School District.
These increases taould require additionat facilities, namely an elPmentary _
sd_iool. New school facilities are generalty not oonstructed until there
is an overwhelming neec3. Then, temporary over crowding of classroams
occurs unt i 1 the new f ac il i t i es are completed.
5.4 Parks and Other Recreational Facilities
a. Existing Conditions
Within a two-mile radius there are eight county awmed, or administrated,
parks or recreation areas. The foLlowing tahle shows the parks within
t.his two-mile radius, with the ctosest parks first.
Name ZYpe A+creaqe
Sullzvan Park Picnic & Recreation Ar_ea 10.2
Plantes' Ferry Park Historical Site - Picnic Area 20.0
Mirabeau Recreation
Area Picnic Area 5.0
Central Valley Lian's
Club Recreation
Area Pianic Area 2.0
Valley Mission Park Neighbozhood park - Playgrour4d
& Pool 7.0
Ness Par k Cammun ity Playg round 3. 5
Miltwood City Par k Ne ighborhoocl Par k- nlayg roun+d 6.5
Kmx Park Tot lot 1.2
Aocord ing to Planning for Par ks { revised in Spokane County, Washington,
19761, t-he project is located in the VPlox neighborhood. Tilie
mighbarhood had a 15 acre comnunity park requirement that would be
located adjacent to or in the vicinity of the proposed junior. high
school site; which is located just to t!e east of the project.
In addition to ttie abovP mPntioned Darks, thP three schools mentioned in
5.3 have recreational facilities for baseball, footbatl, track, and opo-n-n
fields for various recreationai activities.
56
b, The Probabie I:npact of the Proposed Action
It is expected that the proposal would cause increasec7 usage of thQ above
mentioned facilities.
c. Measures to Mi,tigate Adverse Impacts
Because of immediate acress to school playfields and a variety of parks
in thm- vicinity, recreationat needs of the site witl 5e mitigated.
Atso, the addition of funds f rom County property taxes can aid in
providing furr7s both for operation an,d maintenance of the facilities and, where warranted, acquisitian of new park space.
d. Unavoidable Adverse ITTacts
A moderate irczease in local park use and school playf ietd facilities,
with increased maintenance costs, can be anticigated.
5.5 Maintenance
a. Existing Conditions
There are no existing roads on the project site. Trent~cxd Irriga*ion
District maintains a 10" water line that runs across the site. Svokan?
County maintains adjacent roads for retaairs anc7 snow plowing.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proioosed Action
The project would add about 15,000 feet (2.8 milesti of roads, aiater and
possibly sewer trunks to the Spokane County maintenance
responsibilities. The water system would be maintatned by the Trentwooci
Irrigation District. Tnlashington Ilater Power Campany would be
respansible ' for maintenance of underground pawer lirie extension on the
site.
c. Measures to %Iitigate Adverse Impacts
Tax revenues and rronthly servioe charges are used to fund operation and
maintenance of utilities arid roads.
d. Unavoidaale Adverse Smuacts
Additianal maintenance costs and resources will have to bp- committed for
utilities and transportation systems serving the developmPnt.
57
5.6 Other Governnental Services '
a. Existing Conditians
Tlp- 3zea is serviced by the Opportunity 8ranrh Post Office and
other services associated with this type of proposal.
No mail or other governmental servioes are received on the project site.
b. The Probable Impact oE the Proposed Action
The proposal will include an extension of postal servioes as wetl as
other goverrunental services associated with the pubtic.
c. rieasures to LMitigate the Adverse Impacts
The use of cluster maitboxes oould reduce the impact of delivery time and
trave 1.
d. Unavoida5!e Adverse Impacts
LNone
6. Enerqy_
6.1 Amounts r wquired
a. Existing Conditions
At the present time energy consunptian on the proposed project site is
limited to that energy required for use ot farm equipment for plawing,
seeding, harvesting, fertilizing and other_ associated farm activities.
In additivn, P-nergy is also consumed by the natural systems at work on
the site. The natural systents involve energy exchange arrong the various
eoological elements.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Actian
The proposed project's impact on energy during the short-term witl be
the use of energy for construction of the project. This would include
consumption of fossil fuels by construction equipment and vehicles
transportirig workers and materiats. In addition, there will be irx3irect
uses of energy caused by ower requiremPnts for the production of thP
various building materials.
It is est-imated that the development, when co7npleted, wilt oonsump-
approx imately 10.9 million kilawatt hours of P1Pctricitv per year.
Natura 1 gas requiremrynts are based on heating needs of 25 percent of the
project's I.-Knes, and tgould 5e estunated to consume 134,000 therms per
year. The follc7wing ta5te provides abreakdawn of the use of
58
~
electricity and natural gas for the completed project, anticipat-ing
~ 25 percent natural gas and 75 percent electric heat. :iome energy dp-nands
are as follaas :
Electrically Heated Homes
44,000 kwh/home/year x 201 units = 8.8 mitlion lcwh/year
Natural Gas Heated Homes
~ 2,000 therms/year x 067 units = 134,000 thecros/year
Electr ical IVe?ds of Gas Heated Homes
30,800 kwh/home/year x 67 units = 2.1 million kw;z/year
The Washingtan Water Power Company indicates that current Pnergy souroes
~ are adequate to servioe thP proposal.
Traffic generated by the proposal woutd also represen* a significant
increase in the amount of fossil fuel constuned.
The rate of use of motor fuel for private 'Cransportation is in a large
~ part depPndent on cammuting distances to primarily work, but also shop-
ping, recreational, cultura.l and educational facilities. The project
is relatively close to job opportunities located in the Spokane Indus-
trial Park; and Kaiser Trentwood. Nu.merous entertainment, recreational,
cultural, and educational fa+cilities are located in the Spokane Valley
area. Shopping travel would be iriconvenient as no shoppinq canters are in
~ the imnediate area. Argonne Village and University City are lxated
approximte ty faur and six miles away, respectively.
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
The proposed development could empl(YI innovative conservation measures
~ iahich would result in reductions in potential enerqy consumption. The
requirement for plan review k7y the developp-r will result in the
opportunity to incorporate construction design features to obtain greater
efficienties in the u*ilization of enerqy resources. The follaaing
measures are reoommended.
;li Adequate insulation in roof, walls, and ceilings to reduce heat
~ transmission.
(21 Use of high perfocmance furnaces that ca.n recover waste heat from
flue gas or thase with a flue shut-off.
(31 Use of heat retaining fireplaces or wood stoves.
141 Use of high-performance air-conditioning units (if absolutely
necessary for climate control► with open-air cyclPs.
` 51 Provision of storm windows and storm doors.
161 Provision of wirr3ows that can be opened and closed.
(71 Use of tinted glass in windaws.
(8) Gouble glass wirxlows.
191 Use of landscaping on the south and west sides of the buildings.
;10) Provisions for screens, shades, and curtains.
• 1111 We.Ll-ventilated attics.
! 121 Use of dark-oolored roofs.
1131 Use of flouresoent rather than incanrlesaent lights.
59
~ ,
Reduction of travel t une to shopoing areas should occur , as the arPa
develops and market conditions becarnp- favorable to the construction of
facilities in t-he irttmediate area.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
The proposal will result in increased demands for energy consumption in
the area for automobiles and hcane energy needs.
6.2 Source Availability
a. Existing Conditions
Existing sources, and availability of thPse sources are managed
pr iraar ily by the Washington Water Pawer Company. Energy availability
is 100% in this general servioe area. Ptans are underway at washington
Water Power to acconnodate expected increases in demand in the arPa.!241
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
The 258 new homes will require electricity and naturat gas to be supplied
by Washington Water Pawer Company. Current availability is 100%.for the
phased development.
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
Conservation of energy as mentianec3 in Section II 5.1!ct shoutd
increase availability.
d. Unavoic3able Adverse Impacts
None, if futl conservation measures are implemented. "
7. Utilities •
7.1 Energy (See Section 6 above on Fnergy+
7.2 Communications
a. Existing Conditions
Pacific Notthwest Be11 servioes thP area . No utilities exist on thP
project site, but telephone lines exist all arouna the project site. `
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Action
The 258 neTa hones will require Pacific Northwest Be11 services. The tine
capacity is sufficient to 'nandle tlhe anticipated dema.*lr_i.
60
~
+ c. :2easures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
Any adverse impacts which may result from thP proposal may be mitigatec3
by close coordination of easement location and projec*_ design.
d. Unavoida5le Adverse Impacts •
~
None.
7.3 Water ( See Sectian I 3.9, Public 'rTater Supplies~
a. Existing Conditions
~
The project site is currently in Trenttiaood Irr igation Distr ict.
b. The Probable Impact oF the Proposed Actian
Tkie proposal creates a maximum sumnertime demand of up to 665,000
~ gallons ger day for clomestic and garden uses.
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
Zf the demand exceeds the existing systPm caDacity, a?ditional sources,
storage or puatping oould be provided to~ acommodate the demand. A
~ rmthly servioe charge pays for operation and maintenance of public
water supplies. _
d. Unavoidable Adverse tmpacts
NoM.
i
7.4 Sewer
a. Existing Conditions
~ There is currently no sewage treatment facitity avaitahle to servire
;he project. Over the vast decade, severat studiPs have been made
which directly or irdirectty deat with the problem of sewage management
over the Spokane Aquifer. To date, no goverrimental ptan has been
f ormally adopted.
! b. The Probable Impact of the Propased Action
The project proposes irx3ividual septic ta.nk drainfield systems with
dr, yli re sewers. T`he i.mgact of septic tank systems is d iscussed in
Section I, 3.8. Septic tank drainfield systems are proposPd as interim
facilities with pcssible short term impacts, provided that the dryline
*
61
~ ,
i
sewers are eventually utilized. Dryline sewers provirle the proposed
development witn several central oollection se,aer alternatives }-~oth on
and off site. An on-site treatment f acilitv coutd be develooed within
the Bonneville Pawer Administration's pawertine easement bordering the
project site to thP north (as shawn on the site plani. The impact of
this alternative would vary with the tyge of treatment facility
eventually developed and may also be considered an inter im f acitzty.
In addition, the atter.native of eventual hook-up to an oft-site
treatment facility exists if, in thP future, a Spokane Valley sewering
project was developed. It is difficult to predict the impacts of
these sewer ing alternatives not kmwing t_he exact level of treatment
anticipated. tiSee Sewage Atternatives subsp-r-tion of the Alter_natives
portion of this report, as these possible sewage disposal alternatives are examined.►
c. Measures to Niitigate Adverse Impacts
The possible sewage treatment alternatives would require environmentat
revie,a by local, state ar-d federal agencies having jurisdiction.
Increased costs of these facilities woutd be mitigated by funds
acquired through taxes and user charges.
d. Unavoida5le Adverse Impacts
Increased cost for insfiallation of dryline sewer and pcxssible futurP oneration ana maintenance costs of a treatment facility.
7.5 Stozm Tnlater
a. Existing Conditzons
Storm water on the site is largely ab9orbecl by the rapid permeability of
on-site soils. F.xceptional storn water on the site t"~at
exceeds capacity of indigenous soils follows naturat drainage-ways to
local te:r)orary ponding areas. Current golicy in the area is disposal
of increased storm runoff by on-site da.sposat. (See Appendix A f_or
Storm Drainage Report, SL=erfield East.►
Most of the existing storm water systems are culverts with roadside
ditches. There is a seasonal problPm of soring runoff a3ming down the
Forker Road Draw. The existing runo'Llf oontrol struc,tures are in a
poor state oF repair and occasionatly causP street flaws over Forker
Road near the northwest corner of the project.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposp-d A,cticm
Increased storm water generated by 25% of the site beincg covered by
i~nperv ious sur f aces .
62
~
t c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts
The storm water runoff will be disposed of on site via drywetl or
similar devices. The engineering characteristics of these devices
wilt be determined by consultation with the Spo'cane County EnginPer.
What the SpoScane County Lngineers will elect to do about the Forker Road
~ runoff problem is not icnatan at this time. It will most likely be a
ooinbination of restoration of the existing ditches and canals with a
possible detention or retention structure constructed in thP draia.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
~ The possibility of a storm in excess of design standards is possibl_e
with resulting potentiat for minor locat ftooding and porxding.
7.6 So1id Waste
• a. Existing Corxjitians
Solid waste pickup in the area is handled bI Valley Garbage Servioe.
b. The Probable Lmpact of the Proposec3 A+ction
• The project would generatP approximately 540 tans per year after
fu11 developnent. These materials would be d isposed of at the
sanitary landfill at Mica. ( M
c. Measures bo Mitigate Adverse Impacts
• If the American demand for etaborate packaging oL eonsumables were
lessened, there would be a aortmensurate clYOp in generated garbage.
d. Unavoidable Adverse Impacts
None.
! Human Health
Human heatth issues are addressed in sections on grourtd watPr quality
and public services. The proposal does :zot pase any specific human
health hazards.
~ 9. Aesthetics
y/A
10. Recreation (Refer to Sectian II, 5.41
~
53
~
i-
11. Archaeoloqical/'Historical
a. Existing Conditions Representatives f rom the Spokane County Planning Depar_tment have
iridicated that no .cnaan archaeological site is located within the
Droject area, but that oroperties within ctose proximity to the Spokane
River have been designated archaeologically sensitive.
Dur ing the mid-1800' s a military wagon route, the Mullan Road, was
located within the general area, Pxtending frcxn Walla Walla, Washington
to Fort Benton, Montana. No physical evidence of this trail exists
today.
b. The Probable Impact of the Proposed Actian -
There exists a remote possibility that during the excavation and
grad ing phase of the project objects of archaeological or h istor ic
interest may be discnvered.
c. Measures to Mitigate Adverse Impacts .
The remote possibitity of archaeological sites or finds will require
careful excavation and foundation digging, being awarP that something
could be found. Special instructians to contractors should be issi.p-d
on what to look for and what to do if samethirtg is found. In the event
~ istor ical or archaeological objects are revealed, the off ice of
the Spokane County Planning Department shall be inanediatety notifixd.
d. Uriavoidable Adverse Impacts
None.
12. Adc?itional Population Characteristics
N/A
64
The Relationship Between Local ShoCt-Tezm Uses of Man's Fnvironment
And The 'Maintenance and Enhancement of Lonq Term Productivity
Development of the 91-acre site into a 263-lot residPntial caTnnuni.ty
will have an impact on the long term productivity of the property in
terms of its present agricultural. use. The proger.tl plays a small role
in the agriculturat economy of the region and therefore the loss of the
current use wi11 have a slight eff_ect on agricuttural produc-
tivity in the Spokane area. The reduction of agricuttural land,
;marginal productivity►, considered in light of the increasing clemand
for moderate Driced housing in the Spokane area, may bP considered an
enhanoement of the long term productivity oE the arPa.
The "Generalized ramprehensive Plan, SpokaLne Metropolitan Area,"
designates the site as being appropriate for residPntiat neighborhood.
A comQretiensive plan is intended to maximize the ozder lin,ess and
-productivity of an areas grawth in the long term, therefore, the
developrnent of this site into a resic7ential neigh-borhood will be the
best use of the land in terms of maintenance and en.hanoement of
larig-term productivity for the area.
The project may have an impact on the lang-term productivity of the
~ Valley Aquifer as a source of damestic water for the area. The use of
sub-surface dra inf ields f or d isDosal of wastP water may pose a threat
to ground water quality when considering the cumulative impact of this
project with other cievelopments in the Va11ey. (Data from the on-goirx3
"208" Water Study on quality of the aquifer will be available in the
future to give more cvmparative and detailed information on this
ground water quality questiQn.o 'I'he use of dry-line sewers or a centrat
sewage treatment facilitv could, in tater years, be connccted to a
central county or city sewage treatment facility i` one were to 5e
constructed or made available, theteby providing for lang-term
productivity of the aquifer.
The project woutd enhance the long-term and short-term economic
productivity and tax revenue picture for the area as well as provide
new housing to meet the present s'nort-term ciemands.
65
f
Irreversible and Irretrievable Cananitments of Resources
The 91 acre site will irreversibly and irretrievably camit the
Sumnerfield land to non-agricultural uses, resulting in a loss of
cvltivated wheat anc7 har ley or hay.
ThP project will irreversibly and irretrievably camnit other resources
required during the construction phase, including labor, money, pawer,
fossil fuels and building materials.
After developrnent of the project, the resident occupants will oonsume
energy in tlze form of electricity arxl fossil fuels for tighting, heating
ana air-oonditioning of each r-Nrel.ling. (See Elements of the Human
Fnvirornnent, Section 6, for fur~her discussion.►
66
ALTERNATIVES TO 'IHE PROPOSED PROIJECT
The SEPA r-bic-lelines reqvire the EIS to inctLx3e adescription
and objective evatuation of any reasonable alternative action tdhich
could feasibly attain the objectzve of the proposal." nese quidetines
;WAC 197-10-440(121 note t5at reasonable alternatives shall include any
actian which might approximate the proposat's objective, but at a lower
envirorimental cost or decreased ?evel of environmental degradation.
Also, the use of tho- t-lm-rm "reasonaale" is intended to l.imit both the
nwnber. and rangp- of atternatives that shatl be described and evaluated, -
- as weU as the amQUnt or level of detail which the EIS shall emplov for
- each alternative that is discussed and evaluated. The analysis of
alternatives should be, howp-ver, sufficiently detailed to pQrmit a
comparative evaluation of each alternative and the proposal. .
1. No Action
The site would remain in its present undevelooed state with limited
agricultural prodtzction. The long term nature of the site cannot 5e
guaranteed by the no-action alternative. Continup-c3 growth in the East
Valley area, together with the locational advantaqe of the site in relatian to nearby major transporta*ian networks, public school.s and
ernploy:nent centers will, no c?oubt, result in an increase in tand va.lue
and in develop:nent pressures for land use conversions to more intensive
uses. In addition, the site is located within an ar_ea where simitar
residentiat developnent has taken place.
The no-action alternative tdoulcl eliminate both the adverse anc3
beneficiat a,mpacts resulting fram the proposed project and would not
li►cely result in a delay in the eventua~ d-lo-vel.opment of the site.
2. Development As Allowed Under ExistinQ Zoninq
- The site has been zoned -kgricvltural ;A► and permits the follawing
uses: Cultivation of land; nurseries, greenhouses; dairying; rabbitry;
poultry raising; stock raising; roadsidP starKIs; single-familv
dwellings, 112,500 sq. ft. with 100-ft. frontage); churches,
libraries, museums; non-profit axnmunity halts and lodges; kindergarten
and nursery schools; children's nomes; hospital and sanitaziums; feed
- mills; packing and processing ptants and warehouses for agricultural
purposes; a contractor's maintenance, revair and processing huilding
and storage yard; an animal cp-metery; oommercial riding or boarding
stables; schools or institutions of oozrectian. In addition the
agricultural zone permits tLhe follawing "conditional us-m-s" with the
approvat of a Condittonal Use Permit:
67 '
r
Gun club and rifle range, golf driving range; garbage distoosal dirnp;
r-ammercial fur farms; auto tarecfcing yard; a dunlex, trailer as a
nursing horne; gocart tracks; !cenriels; sawmills ard tLmberyards; and a
commer c i al f eed lot.
Development under this alternative could result in simi-lar, if not more
severe adverse envirannental impacts than those identified for the
proposed action.
3. Project Implementation at a Future Date
Deterrring the project to some future periocl of time taould only postpone
the impacts identified for the pzoposed action. Projecr implementation at
a future date could result in a more intensive future development due to
increased costs.
4. Development of the Project on an Alternative Site
The possibility of a similar residential subdivision on an alternative
site is not a viable atternative for the project spansors, since they do
not aan a similar parcel of lancl wit~'~ similar locationat advantages.
The primary intent of selecting an atternativ2 site would be to reduce
the immact on this vicinity's environment az to eomplete the project on
another site for a lawer overall environmentat oost. Even if this
sponsor ataned an atter_nativP site, the project oould havP rnocP serious
imgacts than the present site. These probletns might include: intr_usion
on significant floral ttiabitats; lack of aciequate access to major traffic
ways; slope and erosion and/or slide hazards; greater distanees fram
work, oommerciat and enter_tainment centers; and a greater distance f rom
required services. Availahle building areas in the Sgokane Valley,
compar.able in size to the project, tend to to be locired further frc7m
the camrnercial, employrttent and culturat centers of the arPa.
5. Alternative Residential nensities
Development of the projeet at a lower residential density would
proportionately reduce traffic generation, air potlution, and roise in the vicinity of thn site. 'I'he demand for rublic services ;parks, -
schools, fire and policel and utilities lenergy, water, and waste-wate,:
treatmentt, would also be reduced. It is possible, however, that a
significantly lvaer density would not be ecoromicatly feasible to
uevelop the project as proposed. Dryline sewers or a central coLtection
treatrnent facility would not be econamicatly feasible. DevPlopment at
laaer density would result in significantly higher per-unit developnent
and purc':iase costs in terms of lanc7, amprovements, and utilities. In
addition, lower density develovnents require more land pen cousing unit,
contributing to urban sprawl.
Deve loprnent o f the Droj ect wi-th ahighe r dens i ty would propor t ionate ty
increase traffic generation, air pollution, an,1 noise in the vicinity of
the site. ThP clemand for public services ; par_ ks, schools, f i re and police►
and utilities ; energy, water, and waste-water trAatrn?nt$,would be
irlcreased. 63
~
It is possibte, haaever, that a higher dPnsity developrnent would be more '
economicaLty feasible to support the required utilities and services required for the project. Development at a higher density t,a+ould result ~
in significantly lower per-unit developrnent and purchasing cost.
However, a higtier density development eould conflict with existing
densities in the area depending on design techniques utilized.
The second part of the altArnatives to the pr.oposed project review will
be an analysis of the atternatives relatPd to the method of waste
water disposal on the site.
The on-site systems which are availab.le include septic tanks onty .
and central ooLlo-ction trPatment facilities.
Septic Tank - Drainf ielc7 Svstem ,
The septic tank is a one or sevzral coimpartment contain?r c3esigned to
improve the effluent quality to pr.olong the life of the subsurface
disposal field. Individual ori-site septic tank and drainfietd systems
dispose of organic waste by biocltiPmicat anearobic deooniposition in the '
seotic tanlc. The effluent then flcsws to a drainfietd where it is further processed by the soil co.lumrYm surrounding it, and the effluent
then is disposec3 of b,y a cambination of evaporation, transpiration fro-in vegetatian, and percolation. Percolation would nor.matly only occur
during wet tainter months where precipitation exceeds evapotranspiration. Septic tanks and drainfields are easily a.nstatled, and don't zequire
oollp-ctor lims, pumps, blowers, precipitators, lift stations, etc., to
perform their function. Properly installed and maintained, septic tank
systems do not produce odors.
_ Problem oomrnonly associated with septic tank systems aze usually due to
tack of maintenancQ by the hoateowner. Propen comeawner maintenance
would include pumping of the s?ptic tan'c every three to seven years
and replaoement of the drainfield every fivP to 20 year.s.
_ Depending on t'rp- actual configuration of the agiifer in the genPrat area
of the project, and other development activity in the Spokane 'Jalley,
the concentration of sewage relatec3 contamin,3nts found in the ground
water may, in isolated areas, approach the maximum allawec3 r.7y the Federal
Drinking Water Standards.
The most recent "203 Study"* findings strongly suggest that contaminants
_ associated with septic tan;c efftuent are reaching the ground water and
Lhat concentrations of these contaminants a*_-e qeneratly highest around
11-he uer iphery of the aqu i f er . I f} hese "203 Stuciy" f i rdings orove to be
eonctusive, then the use of septic tanks in or.ojects such as Summerfietd
East located near the periphery of the aquifer should be on-an interim
basis. * Refer to the "208 Stuudy".
69
Central Collection and Interim Secondary Treatment '
This alternate includes a central collection system serving each
residence in the project. Interim treatrnent would be provided 5y Aither -
a mechanical extended aeration plant or a system of aerated lagoons and
polishing ponds. Efftuent disposal would be via an extensive system of
conantmity drainfields. The treatment anrl effluent disposal facitities
would be located within thQ Bonnevitte Pcywez Administration easement
imiiediatel.y tv t'ne north of the proposed project. Sewage would 5e
oollectec3 at the south end of the proj ect and pmnped nor ~h to the -
treatment sitP. The pumping facility would be equipQed with standby
pawer or storage to assure adequate service during pcxaer outages. The
entire coltection and treatmP~t system woutd be operatp-d by Spokane
County. .
This oompletely public waste water system would have ttie flexibility of .
being connected to an area wide system in tLhe future, anci would receive
re li able oper at i on and ma intenance . ~
The effluent disposal system (drainfietc3s► may contribute contaminants to the ground water within a shorter time frane than if the project
were served by individual septic tank anr3 drainfield systPns because -
the cammunity drainfield system would be concentrated within a
seven-acre area. This 'nigher concentration would probably result in a
higher percentage of thP total quantity of effluent peroolating into
t-he so il. 'I`he h igher percolat ion rate woutd li kply result in a
corresgonding increased travel rate of seRaage rPtated contaminants
througti the soil aolumn to the ground'water. -
Discussion
Because of EPA's Sole SoLirce Designation of Sookane's aquifer, our
incr?asing obligation to protect our source of drinking water, and the
i mreasi ng ev idence that sPwage re lated contami nants ate reach i m the
aquifer; it appears likely that the Spokane Vallev wil.1 have a fairly
extensive area wide waste water management system within thP next 10
to 15 years. Based on this assumptian, the proposed system of dryline
sewers and septic tanlcs rather than either of the al_ternatives apQears
to offer thP aest interi,-n waste water management system for this
project. On a short term basis, the sewage related contaminants wilt 70
~
mast likely 5e transported toward the grouncl water at a slaaer rate
and in lower concentrations than if oommunity drainfields were used
for effluent disposal. On a long term basis, the system can 5e
' connected to an area wide collection systPm with'retative Pasp and the
effluent transportecl to a regionat plant where more extensive and
soph isticated ti eatrnent is ava ilable.
e
71
(
FbCnNOTES
- Washinqton Climate, for these counties Adams, Linootn, Spokane, Wh itman, May 65 page 7.
2. Climate Atlas of the United States, U.S. Government Printing
Offioe, 1958
~
72
~
!
r
b ~
f
APP'EWIX A `
STC3R~! DRAINArE REPt7RT
' StM►IERFIFJ-,D EAST
,
;
73
~
~
~
i
R
4
~
STORtvi DRAINACM, itEPORT ~
SLPOERFT aD ENST P
6
The proposed subd ivis ion woutd plat 86 acres of cultivated f armland '
into approximately 266 lots ; typical lot size 10,000 sq. ft.1. T`le
roads ~would be paved with concrete curbs. Storm water disposal ~
proposed by on-site drywell.s. ~
r
For purposes of determining *he effects of urbanization on storm ~
water runoff in the drainage areas, Urban Hydroloqy for Small ~
Watersheds, Technicat Release No. 55 by the Engineer ing Division of ~
the Soil Conservation Service, U.S. Departrnent of Agricul*ure, ~
January 1975 ; SCS '.Ket?~x~d~ , will be usx1. '
s
~
11 To determine peak rates of runoff from 'Che overatl project. r
~
$ of SCS ~
a. Soit Type Basin Basin Ctassification i
,
Garrison GravellY Laam 4vera1l 100% B ~
'
Description of Soils: The soil is made up of scymewhat ~
excessively drained, gravelly or stony soils that form- ~
ed under grass in glacial outaash and has moderately ;
rapid permeability. .
~
b. S1oDe of the basin 0$ - 8% :
c. Roughly 100$ of the lan-d is cultivated with conservation treatrnent. Present condition yields a Rurxoff Curve Num-
ber (N) of 71. Future conditicns of 1/4 acre residential
lots, approximately 40$ impervious, yields a r"~1 of 75.
d. The 24-hour preeipitation for the area foc a 50-year s`ocm
is 2.4 inches.
e. Use of attached Figures I& II
21 Calculations: '
t
a. Overatl basin present runoff ~
Area = 86 acres
CN = 71
Runoff depth = .46 in. '
Flat slope of 1$
Peak discharge = 27cfs/in.
Slope factor - l. 00
Q= 1. ;27 cfs /in.► .46 in. = 12.40 cfs
74
~
~
Overall basin future runoff
CN = 77
Rurioff depth = .70
Peak ci ischarge = 35 cfs/in.
Slope factor 1.00
Q= l; 356 .70 = 24.5 cfs
31 Dra inagea Proposat
From the resulting calcutations, we see that the plat
will double the ruzxoff with future development.
Requirements aT~ that one double bar.rel clrywell wilt
_ dispose of one cfs. With this in minrl, we ss-mp- that there
are near ly 25 cfs oF ru.noff np~~t"i-rig tn d isoosed of
during a 50-year storm resulting in a minimuml reoonIInended
25 dr ywe 11. s.
_ Using past subdivision development stuAies in the valley
area in similar soits, I have oome up with scxne figu_res
showing that one drywell is neecled for every four to six
residential lots. Using an average of five, this would
mean that a possible 57 drywelts ooulcl be propocsa_cl for
the plat site.
~ There would 5e some off-site drairiage flora fro:n thP back
lots along the west project boundary and the adjacent lots
alcng t_he school site property. 'I'he flaas crossing these
boundaries will 5e minimal.
For this plat, cn-site disposal is practical and capabte
'of relieving the rurnff.
A1rng with this study of the plat area, vre h3ve studied the drainage
area above the plat which during high runoff oeriods of tha- yeat has
overflowed the nearby unimproved canat anrl creatPd probtems over t'nf-z
roadway and along the bounc7ary of the pzoposed Projp-r-t site.
I have come u'o with so;ne calcutations based on the Spokaze County Soil
Survey and the Soil Conservation Service TR #55. These calculations
shDw that there coutd be so;ne reasonably high flows.
Calculations:
450 Acres Class "B"
Sub Area I= 645 acres (125 acres Class "C", 70 acres Class "AN
75
~
f ,
Reach Descr iption of f law Slope Lenqth ( f t. )
A to B Cultivatcd farm lar-d 3 2380
B to C Shalla,a draw thin stand forest 3 3170
C to D Steeper draw thin starxd forest 7 3350
235 Acres Class "B"
Sub Area II = 350 acres 120 acres Class "A", 105 acrPS Class "C"► ,
Reach Description of flow Slope ($i Length (ft.s '
,
A bo 8 Shallaw draw thin stand forest 20 1980
Bto C Shallaw draw thin stand forest 5 4350
a
C to D Steeper draw thin starx3 forest S 390"0
;
Sub Area III = 220 acres ~ 20 acres Class "A", 200 acres Ctass "B"o ~
Reach Description of flow Slope Lenqth (ft.1 ;
A to II Steep draw thin stand forest 16 3160 4
B to C Steep draw thin stand forest 12 2770 =
,
;
E
Sub Area I t
►
~
Reach A- B 2380 ft. = 2975 sec. '
.8 ft/sec B- C 3170 ft. = 2641 sec.
1.2 ft/sec .
C- D 3350 ft, = 1914 sec.
1.75 ft/sec
7530 sec. ~
Tc = 7530 sec.
3600 sec./hr = 2.1 hr.
Sub Area II
Reach A- B 1980 ft. = 619 sec. 3.2 ft/sec ~
B- C 4360 ft. = 2725 sec. :
1.6 f t/sec ~C- D 3950 ft. = 1980 sec. -
2.0 ft/sec ~
Tc = 5324 sec
3600 sec/hr = 1.5 hr ~
76
~
~
Sub Area III
Reach A- B 3160 ft. = 1128 sec.
2.8 ft./sec.
3- C 2770 ft. = 1154 sec.
2.4 ft./sec.
2282 sPc.
Tc = 2282 sec. _ .6 hr.
3600 sec/hr
- Su5 Area I
Land Use Acres ON Product
Cultivated Land L Groun C► 125 78 9, 750
Cultivated Land ;Gr.oup 31 120 71 8,520
Thin Stand Forest ;Group As 70 45 3,150
Thin Stand Forest (Group Bi 330 66 21,780
. 545 43,200
'rqeighted CN = 43200 = 67
645
Sub Area II
Land Use Acres ON Pr_oduct
Thin Stand Forest (Group A► 20 45 900
Th in Stand Forest ( Gr.oup Ct 40 77 3,080
• Thin Stand Forest ! Group Bt 115 50 7, 590
Cultivated Land ! Group C) 65 78 5, 070 -
Cultivated Land (Group Bi 120 71 81520
360 25,160
• t~eighted C~.c1 = 25100 = 70
300
Sua Area III
Land Use Acres ON Product
PasIture Poor (Group A) 20 58 1,360
Pasture Foor (Group Bt 120 79 91qg0
Thin Stand Timaer ;Group Bi 80 66 51280
-220 16,120
Weighted ('N = 16120 = 73
220
77
`
~
Sub Area Drazn Area Time of Concentration Runoff Curve Run4ff*
( mi ! hoursi Number ( in. i ,
I 1.00 2.10 67 ,33
II .55 1.50 70 •42 III ,35 .60 73 .51
*Table 2-1 for SO-year 24-hour precipitation P= 2.4 inches
Rainfall
(inchess CN .
'v5 67 70 73 75
2.0 .14 .24 .38
2.4 .27 .33 .42 .Sl .00
2,5 .30 .46 .65
DISCHAFtGE M LtiI.A,KY °
Sub Drainage Rain- Run- 12.1 12.5 12.9 13.0
area Tc Area fall CLN off hr. 'Lir. hr. hr.
~ hr.► ;mi.1 ! in.► ( in.► ; cfs► ( cfs► (cfs► ( cfs)
I 2.1 1.00 2.4 67 .33 21 31 56 50
II 1.5 .55 2.4 70 .42 24 48 55 52
III .6 .35 2.4 73 .51 62 37 23 20
Total Ccrffposite Hydrograph at End of. Areas 107 116 121 132
Use 150 cfs f or a conservative number. Determine flaw in trapezoidal open channel.
Existing canal cross section alang pzoject boundary:
5vid~h = 4.0'
6' deep krown Q= 150 cfs during high runoff
14' wide at top
Side Slope = .5:1
Q= 1.49 x AR 2/3 S 1/2
n
assune n = .035 ,
triat depth of 4.0 gives 138 cfs
trial depth of 4.1 gives Q= 148 cfs
78
Assuming depth of channet to be 4.1' high, then we can assume that the
culverts are of Lmproper sizing, causing the canal bo breech.
Using "HandSook of Stee 1 Drainage & Highway Canstruction Prx3ucts,"
published by American Iron and Steel Institute, a culvert of 50" in
d iameter would be needed to handi e that h igh of f low at the exist ing
slope of the culverts. T`1e?'e are none of that size to be found along
the canal system.
As shown on the plat map, there are a few things that coutd be done to
help insurP the safety of the pr_oposec3 project site.
~
~
79
~
'
~
AIDIIJDiJI+~I TO ST.J.`2'`EWIELD AMST DRAINAGE T
An atternate method to dispose of the stormwater runoff coaning from the
above drainage basin would be to consLrtict a retention pand at the
northast boundary of the proposed plat. The pond would 5e approx-
imately 2acres in surface area and have a depth of five ; 51 fi-met.
ThQ pond would have the capacity to retain the peak flaw of 132 cfs
and dispose of it for its duration.
The construction of this pond woutd involve grading the topsoil away
aryl incorporating it into the dike walls. The oomputations are as '
follows using Spokane County Soil Survey peroolation rate of 10"/hour
in Garrisan Gravetly Soil.
.2 .
2 acres ; 43550 ft 1 10 ft. 1 hr. = 20 cfs infiltration rate
acre 12 hr 3600 sec.
Frcxn graph :
3
Storage required f-or Area I - 204,000 ft
3 Storage requi red for Area II - 112,000 f t
3
Storage required for Area SII - 118,000 ft
434,000 ft 3
' 3
434,000 ft 3
2 ac. (43550 ft acre
For a storm of a greater frequency an overflaa structuie coutd be
constructed to take t?ze flow alcxig Forker Road to the existing ditch
and a 1lowed to bypass the plat.
80 _
~
.
.
APPE"LqDzx $
~ LEGATi D^S. CRIPTION OF
SWSERFI EGTJ EAST
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
81
~
~
Legal Description
Prel iininary Plat Surrmerfield East
That portion of the NW 1/4 of Section 35, T. 26 N., R. 44 E.W.M., in
the County of Spokane, State of Washington, lying southeasterly of
Forker Road and southwesterly of the power line easement as recorded
on January 19, 1943, under Audi tor's Fi 1 e No. 572309A;
ALSO the E 112 E 112 SW 1/4 of sa,id section;
AND ALSO that portion of the W 1/2 of the E 1/2 of said section lying
southwesterly of said power line easement;
EXCEPT the Spokane Valley Land & Water Company's canal right-of-way;
AND EXCEPT comnencing at the southwest corner of the southwest quarter
of the southeast quarter of said section; thence east along the south
line of said section, a distance of 350 feet; thence north, a distance
of 933.42 feet; thence west a distance of 700 feet; thence soutn a
distance of 933.42 feet to the south line of said Section 35; thence
east along the south line of said section, a distance of 350 feet, to
the point of beginning;
AND EXCEPT Wellesley Avenue;
AND EXCEPT that portion of the NW 1/4 of said section lying within
Plat #4, West Farms Irrigated Tracts as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, Page 51.
e4 _
WASN~ 0~ .
4-2 16, ►
~
~uu11 ~
~
O,y~ l L M0
~
82
~
APPEWIX C
U _ ILLE POWER .40N4INISTRA.TION
PaaER LNE FASIlMENT
~
83
~
r
BONNEVILTIE PCMR LINE AIMINISTRATIOLN
PaqM LINE EASIIMFNT
That portion of the N.1/2 of the N.W.1/4, the S.Ta.1/4 of the
N.E.1/4, the N.tia.1/4 of the S.E.1/4, the N.1/2 of the S.E.1/4 of
the N.ja.1/4 anc3 the S.E.1/4 of the S.E.1/4 of the N.TJ.1/4 of
Section 35, Tawnship 26 North, Ranqe 44 East of the Witlamette
Meridian, Spokane County, Washington; which ties within a strio of_
land 500 feet in width, the boundaries of said strip lying 175 feet
distant northeastezty from and 325 f_eet distant southeasterly from
and paraltel to the survey tine of ttie Grand Coutee SPokane
transmission tines 3 and 4 as now located an(9 sta'ted on the ground,
over, across, upon and/or adjacent to the above-caescribed property,
said survey line being particutarly described as follaws:
Beginning at survey station 445+50.0 a point on t5e nor_th line of
Sectian 35, Tbwnship 26 North, Range 44 East f the Wiltiamette
Meridian, said point being N. 88 degrees 59' E. a distance of
703.5 feet from the N.W. cozner of saic3 Section 35; thence S. 43 -
degrees 39' E. a distance of 5933.5 feet to survey station
504+83.5; thence S. 0 degrees 59' E. a distance of 949.9 feet to
survey station 514+33.4 a point on the S. line of said Section 35,
said point being S. 89 degrees 36' W. a distance of 510.1 feet
fram the S.E. corner of said Sectian 35.
The aforesaid easement and right-of-way is for the following
purpases, namely: the perpetual right to enter and to erect,
maintain, repair, rebuild, operate, and patrot one oz more
electric pawer_ transmission tines, and one or more telepho-tie
and/or telegra,?h lines, inctuding the right to erect such poles
and other transmission tine structures, wires, cables, and the
appurtenances as are necessary thereto; the further right to
clear said right--of-wav and keep the same clear of brush, timber,
inflwmable structures, and fire haza-rds; and the right to remove
danger trees, if any, locatecj heyond the limi.}s of sair1
r ight-of~aay.
rlb have and to ho!c' the said easPment and r i qht-of-watl unto the ~
United States of America arr.4, its assigns, forever_,
It is further understood and agreed by the undersigned that thP
payment of such purchase price is acoepter3 as full. comp-nsation
for all damages ircidental to thP exercise of any of the r igh`s
above described. ~
~
84
~
,~1► .
~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
I nter-Offi ce Corrmuni cati on
Date: November 20, 1978
TG: Spokane County Plann~ng Department _
ait';,KS.
FROII. .
Eugene C. PraSUBJECT: Draft Environmental Impact Statement - SLIMMERFIELD EAST, October 1978
The following changes or additions are recommended in subject document for the
reasons indicated.
1. Page viii - Amend first sentence to read: "***approximately 80,000 to
93,800 gallons of domestic wastewater***".
2. Page 15 - Amend first line to read mean Total Suspended Particulates
(TSP) levels***". Reason: Advise reader of ineaning of "TSP".
3. Page 16 - At end of second paragraph of section "Carbon monoxide" add:
"The Valley Chamber of Comamerce monitor.ing site is perhaps most relative to
Summerfield East project." Reason: Without a map showing the location of
sampling sites, there is no correlation between the text and the table on
page 17. The relationship of air quality problems in downtown Spokane and
the project site is not made readily apparent.
4. Page 21 - In Section 3.3"Floods", clarify legal responsibility of Spokane
County for the maintenance of the old canal for drainage purposes. Reason:
The refurbishing and use of the canal by the County appears paramount in
the drainage plan.
5. Page 31 - In first sentence, substitute word jEpacted for compacted.
Reason: Accuracy.
6. Page 31 - Second paragraph - Amend to read "***approxi.mately 80,000 to
93,800 gallons of domestic wastewater per day, Reason: See comment
1 above. '
7. Page 32 - Zn paragraph c, add: "The drainage plan should be devised to
_ permit collection and treatment before subsurface disposal as may be
required by the forthcoming wastewater management plan resulting from the
"208" Study". Reason: Groundwater quality is impacted by the total of
man's activities. Storm water runoff from developed areas contributes to
the total pollution as well as subsurface disposal of domestic waste
effluents.
8. Page 39 - In section 7c, add: "Covenants for the plat could require individual
lot exterior lighting to be limited to individual lot boundaries or not
exceed light sources of greater than 40 watts." Reason: Provides a major
control on nuisance glare.
SCHD-ADNi-11 8
~ y
SUMMERFIELD EAST
November 20, 1978 Page 2
9. Page 63 - It is essential that status of the drainage system be clarified;
if not resolved, f looding could adversely affect the use of septic tanks
and drainfields in the plat. Reason: See also conunent 4 above.
10. Page 69. Amend last paragraph to read "***contaminants associated with
man's activities are reaching***". Reason: Accuracy; septic tank
effluent is included in "man's activities", but no evidence is available
indicating a greater percentage of septic tank effluent reaches the
ground water than from a community treatment facility with subsurface
disposal. See discussion on pages 70 and 71.
11. Page 74 - In first paragraph the stated 86 acres and 266 lots is incon-
sistent with earlier plat descriptions. See also paragraph 2 of calculations.
Reason: See page 1, paragraph E.
12. Page 75 - For the personal pronoun "I" substitute the name of the author
or alternatively on page 75 show author's name and signature. The report
should also be dated. Reason: Assist reader in determining credibility
of the report since no individual authors are named nor is source of report
given.
13. Page 79 - In last paragraph, identify the plat map referenced, since the
map on page 5 is labelled as "Site Plan". Reason: There frequently are
more than one plat map during planning stages of a project such as this.
sl
,
R E C E I V E
NOV ~ a i978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
f ~
ACTIVITY LOG
FILE NO. 0" t-12 o G` 78'
~
PLANNER
DATE CONTACT r STAFF COMMENTS
IIVITIALS
n . A
y .
~Zl03 ~
~
ty (vt/ ct-t( tz,JG* 4 . W~- ~
/ U y .
v t
g D 3 ~ r, -/VKld-4~ ~ V
je
/
. Page 1 of 1
. ~
Heather Kauer
From: Copley, Don [DCopley@spokanecounty org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12 05 PM
To: Heather Kauer
Subject: RE Spokane Valley final plats
Hi Heather,
After a review of the files, PE-1852-97 Strawther"s Addition all Health District conditions of approval
have been satified, there are still conditions of approval that have not been satified for the remanning
four plats. We are waiting for Approved Water plans. 1` Note Our records show PE-1206-78
Summerfield Sth and 6th Addition as PE-1206-78 Suminerfield East Sth and 6th Addition. If you
have any additional questions please don't hesitate to call me at 324-1584.
-----Original Message-----
From: Heather Kauer [mailto:hkauer@spokanevalley.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:51 AM
To: jred@spokanecounty.org; dcopley@spokanecounty.org; millerk@spokanevalleyfire.com
Subject: Spokane Valley final plats
Hello there - as you may know, John Todd has left the City. I have taken over final plats:
PE-1917-03/ZE-3-03 Asher Place
PE-1867-99lPUDE-3-99 Pine Rock Ridge
PE-1852-97 Strawther's Addition and
PE-1206-78 Summerfield 5th and 6th Additions
Would you let me know what conditions, if any, are still deficient on these properties from your
offices?
Thanks,
Heather Kauer
Planning Technician
City of Spokane Valley
11707 E. Sprague, Suite106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Phone # • (509) 688-0046
FAX. (509) 688-0037
hkauer@spokanevallev.org
0
8/27/2003
~
~
To: John Pederson
CC:
From: Jim Red (Division of Utilities)
Date: Monday, March 24, 2003
Subject: PE-1206-78 Stage: Final Review Phase: 6th Addition
SUMMERFIELD EAST
FA02 The Division of Utilities does not approve the finalization of the above mentioned project
FA03 Approved plans have not been submitted to this department Please have the agent/developer
contact Billy Urhausen at (509)-477-3604 concerning this
FA06 Security has not been submitted for the project Please have the agent/developer contact Gene
Repp at (509)-477-3604 concerning this.
`
SPOKANE REQ&k DISTRICT
S I:, O K U N T Y
1
A DIVISION OF TF-IE PUBLIC WORKS DEPART1VtENT
DIVISION OF PLANNIt`tG
DATE: March 13, 2003
TO John Pederson, flssociate Planner, Spokane County Planning Division
FROM: Donald Copley, EHS II - EHD, SRHD
SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat PE-12-06-78 (Summerfield East)
6" Addition 46354.9050
Spokane Regional Health District conditions #8 and 9 have not been satisfied by the sponsor of
this plat.
c• Ken Tupper
122 N. Raymond
Spokane; WA 99206
Wyatt Engineering, Inc.
1220 N. Howard
Spokane, WA 99201
Merno/PE-12-06-78 Summc~eld Sth/Ih
MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE (509) 477-7200 • FAX- (509) 477-2243 • TDD (509) 477-7133
~
E-MO
To: Kenneth J Tupper
From: David A. Berto, L.S.
Subject: Plan Review PE 1206F Summerfield East 6"' ADD
Date: March 12, 2003
Our office has received your Plat for review prior to accepting a final Plat. For this department
to continue we need a signed agreement to pay fees to the County Englneer. If you have any
questions call me at 477-3600. Thank you for responding to this matter.
cc John Pederson
Wyatt Engineering
File
03/05/03 NED 17:06 FAX 509 892 4125 SPORANE VALLEY FIRE DEPT 444 PLANNING 0003
SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMEfVT
Spokane County Fire District 1
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WA 99206-3676 •(5fl9) 928-1700 • FAX (509) 892-4125
Mark Grover
Chlel
March 5, 2003
John Pederson
Oepartment of 6uilding and Planning
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Final Plat
Summerfield East 6t' Addition
PE-1206-78
Dear Mr. Pederson:
~
The Spokane Valley Fire Department will require the installation of 2 new fire hydrants ~
at the following locations: !
~
1. S. E. comer of Calvin Road and Crown Avenue.
2. On Crown Avenue, on the lot line of Lots 5&6 BJock 27. ,
. ;
Access and road names listed are adequate.
Sincerely, ~
Kevin Miller Oeputy Fire iUlarshal
KM/dc
M M
Pederson, John
- -
From: Peterschmidt, Lucy
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 4:37 PM
To: Pederson, John _
SubJect: PE-1206-78
Hi John, -
The Stormwater Utility has reviewed this application and we have no additional comments on the current proposal
Thanks,
Lucy
Lucy Peterschmidt, P.E.
Stormwater Utility Engineer '
477-7679
~
>
Avista Utilities
1411 East Mission PO Box 3727 _ - •
Spokane, Washington 99220-3727 ~II~ ~IS~~
Telephone SOA-489-0600 Vtl~ltl@S
Toll Free 80o-727-9170
Facsimde 509-495-8734
February 28, 2003
Ms. Lisa Lozano Frey, E.I.T.
Wyatt Engineecing Inc
1220 North Howard
Spokane, WA 99201
RE: ,Ton vo. 679302
Draf't N,inal Plat oE' Summerfield East & '-Addition
Dear V1s F,-ey•
In reference to the above-mentioned plat, easements are satisfactory Please include a
statement about Border easements in the dedication language as shown beiow
Utitity easements shown on the herein described plat are hereby dedicated to utility
companies which hold a franchise granted by Spokane County or other governmental
entity and are limited to those uses consistent with the construction, reconstruction,
protection, maintenance and operation of said utilities, including gas, electncity,
telephone, cable, together with the right to inspect said utilities and to tnm and/or remove
brush anrl trees which may interfere with the construction, maintenance and operation of
the same. And together with the right to access said utility easements through any
Border easement shown herein. Street light poles, trees and brick, rock or masonry
structures are prohibited within the aforementioned utilrty strip, unless installed by a
servin utili~.
~
Because some Plcets hnve been modifced a~'ter revicew au2d cccceptance hy A vista with
regard to uttlcty easemeiats, we reqicest thut thrs offiCe be nOtcfrecl cj any substantial
chnrtges, sttch us tl•ee ttddttton of Bortler Eccsernents, are nzucle to the Plat pravr to
recortlcng !t as Mot our intentaon to cnuse urarzecessary delnys or cnconvelzcence
Ho4vever, ct rs imperatave that the .servrng tittlcty cornpanres are provccled adequnte space
to inst«ll facclrties
If you have any questions, please feel free to concact me at (509) 495-5536
Sincere(y,
~
Priscilla Sprague
Real Estate Assistant
cc: Ti~m ~ l~ .Adininistrator:--
~Claude Kaler, Avistaw ~ - ~
An afftliate of Awsta Corp
1'6~. \\$?~tdc21RICOH ~v-.....
~.,merl~etd 5th ndd PSL\Survey\d`"9\679302P11"'6 d" 2/11/2005 , 30 42 Ati
~
1\67930~-juPVer Su
-
7
o°'d I W~
m► , + ► ~ ~ `b~~
I ^ r M C'0~~ 10~0? ~ ~ S~~ ~~~~~A i 1 M 11 ~ ~
I 6 ~2 L _ - "1
~ i~~ --~~tt ~ - _ _ ~ _ , ~ ~
•'a _ J _
4
~ w ~ Y9 t
`~f
,
.
I ~ 'I
~ ~ ~ f . oadoG~ k~,"`~. , j►'`~tl"~~ 1
T ~
~
~ ' ~ ~ r 1 ~ i ' ' ' ► c
Q~
~Z ~ . ►
QA.~ ~ ~ ~ I I~
4~ t a
~ ~ ~ ~t ~ t~
p
''g ' ( I + 1~. 1~,~ \ , t4y I~I~I ~
~ I M e4g°_v"
Y
qg
$ ~
~ qf~~
~IL•
~ o ,
~ 5~~
~
~
n~,r
1 ~
VC
n 1~ v ~
~
It&
,
v-
.
• ,-r ~
t
MM•y'^. f s~,713. i
ryw •~,✓i , , _ i✓~'r` ~ Vi ~ N~Y - '1
%`WJS NNMY~`~'~~Y Y~•I .
t~y\~•
03/1I/2005 02:11F
RECEIF'T # 451688
~ S FOYAN E CO{IN TY
. AUDITOR ~
SpOhAhE COUN TY, lJA
, FF0M, : KJT INVESTMEN?S LLC T~► BY : SHIGDEM '
S VMM ~.I~ G A44
'
. ~
' FILE N ;.-3159688 # FqF: 2 . , • , .
' DOC.: {P '
DOCUtiE~lT EE: 90.00
s - ,
I
' i DOC.:,,(MAPCOPY) CS-MRP COFZES 011X17}
DOC4JMENT FEE: • 8.~0
, w
DOC.: '(i1APC FY) CS-MRP COPIES (711X17)
aOCU?fENT E: 8.100
DOC. : (MAPCOPY ) GS-MAF' COP'`°IES 11X17 )
DOCUMENT FEE:
:~.i:•'~titf:RS2it: ~2~~ti~i <~ti+'ti1~+yi~(t~•..•..:<Z?Z.~T?{:4~iY~~~Yitit ` <+~;Kf+isiti~;>ti~Vjj"!~~>~~212~,s}<f<kt~i2~22i212>ZSrti<1 . ~ \ ~5it\ l~ .t \~74 Z• ,\}1.J \
TOTAL RECOkDING FEE 114.00
e
.
CI-,ECk'"~
1024
KJT INVESTMENTS LLC~
~ 114. @Q
e i .1•.. ` . .`r::it•s . . .Y't . _ . ` , j, ` . . + ,
- ~ ~ . - • .
AMOUNY (Checi:),kECEIVED 114.00
CHANGE 0.00
• , RECEIf'T
'1H3K u'j 01 >;N3 ;Cla soflr;
' •i.._. .~.~.~✓n.r.r~• . . •N.r~i.i~In •l.w.vr•~..r iis rt.r ..r i
r"
.
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
NORTH 7 2 O AFZGOrrt1E
S POKANE , WASHINGTON 99212
Prepared f or :
Order No.: SH-257939
KJT LLC. Charge: $175.00
ATTN: KEN TUPPER Tax: $14.18
N. 122 RAYMOND
cc: USKH./Jeff Logan
FIFTH
P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E
Certificate for filing Plat of :
SUMMERFIELD EAST SIXTH ADD.
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's
and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States
District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for
the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing
any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this
certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit:
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 26 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN,
SPOKANE COUN'TY, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 1 SUMMERFIELD
EAST ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 9, SAID POINT BEING A
5/8" STEEL PIN FROM WHICH A 5/8" STEEL PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF PLAT NO. 4 OF WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS ACCORDING TO BOOK "O"
OF PLATS, PAGE 51, BEARS NORTH 0°06'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2610.05
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF
SUMMERFIELD EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1121.63 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3 OF SAID PLAT;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF
SUMMERFIELD EAST FIFTH ADDITlON A DISTANCE OF 405.00 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4, BLOCK 24 OF SAID ADDITION AND THE POINT
OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 0006'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 399.40 FEET;
legal cont.
Page 1 o f 5
~
Order No. SH-257939
legal cont.
THENCE NORTH 90000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 130.95 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 84°12132" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 5°47128" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.57 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35.77 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 62001'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 233.25 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80 ° 50'34" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 182.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67031'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 155.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76027'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 85.09 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 19 SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH
ADDITION ACCORDING TO BOOK 28 OF PLATS, PAGES 21-22;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SUMMERFIELD
EAST FOURTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING FIVE COURSES:
SOUTH 19 ° 18'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
372.50 FOOT RADIUS NON TANGENT CURVE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS
SOUTH 13055'54" EAST;
WESTERLY ON SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7026938"9 AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 48.39 FEET;
SOUTH 68037'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.31 FEET;
SOUTH 21 °22'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET;
SOUTH 0005900" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 171.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF LOT 7, BLOCK 23 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIFTH ADDITION ACCORDING
TO BOOK 29 OF PLATS, PAGES 38 and 39;
THENCE WESTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SUMMERFIELD
EAST FIFTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING NINE COURSES:
NORTH 90000'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 159.82 FEET;
legal cont.
Page 2 of 5
✓
Order No. SH-257939
legal cont.
SOUTH 71 ° 11'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.14 FEET;
NORTH 87 ° 55'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.37 FEET;
NORTH 82048'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.15 FEET;
NORTH 72 ° 52'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.56 FEET;
SOUTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.52 FEET;
NORTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET;
NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN:
K.J.T. INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Washington Limited Liability Company.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos.
46353.9123, 46354.9124.
Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said
parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no
assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3.
- 3. Reservations contained in deed, recorded on October 20, 1886 under Recording No. 946, as
follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be
ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be
necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal
and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same.
Page 3 of 5
Order No. SH-257939
4. BORDER EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Public and to Spokane County
PURPOSE: Road
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: April 24, 2002
RECORDING NO.: 4718034
5. JOINT NATURAL GAS PIPELINE AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE
EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Avista Corporation
PURPOSE: Construct, operate and maintain electric distribution
line, and necessary fixtures and appurtenances
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: June 19, 2002
RECORDING NO.: 4740419
6. TEMPORARY OFF-SITE TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Allowing stormwater drainage and/or runoff over and
across herein described lands; Ingress and egress
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: March 27, 2003
RECORDING NO.: 4867461
7. TEMPORARY NATURAL DRAINAGE AND FLOOD RUNOFF EASEMENT AND THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Temporary natural drainage and flood runoff; ingress
and egress
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: March 27, 2003
RECORDING NO.: 4867462
8. ANY UNPAID ASSESSMENT OR CHARGES, AND LIABILITY FOR FURTHER ASSESSMENTS
OR CHARGES BY SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1.
Page 4 of 5
Order No. SH-257939
9. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer construction, referred
to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer
services. Please contact the Division of Utilities Billing Section for information (509) 477-3604.
DATED AS OF January 28, 2005 at 8:00 a.m.
TRA SNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
i
BY
For service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Sean Heath, Title Officer
ekh/sac
Page 5 of 5
a_ w ~,.~,f«.... , ~.y=w.~;~ ~:z
` ` i `~Y ~ ~ S F ~r° y ° ..G•. -
. : _ _ F ~ • i ^ . " ` , ^ _ v , :~rs ' • ' 4 ".~t~ ~ '
, . ` ` . . ~ r ~ _I ~ ~ t• 1 4a _ V • ~y . `4 h ,7_` ~ ` 't`.'5..... ~ !1r . ~ ~ .lf _ i _ l.y
• L' ~ n, ,ir ~ ~ _ . . 7~~° „
\ r 'l~ ~ . ta ~ ti ` ' _ ~ 1..' ~ ~ , . --v • ~ • f • ~ ~ ~ tCe~~l ~ t`~
! ~ ~j~ ~ • ~ ~ - SY ~`~c" •
J~ ♦ r n e ~ . . ' . 5 t ~ c ' ~ 2 ` • ~~i~~.. I ~ • 1 ~f~.'.t . 4~ .r ~ - v,,' ~ ~
f~ . ' • ~ ~ • - ~ ~ , ! t ~ ..~5 • . 9 • ♦ .I . .1 . ~yn~4~T. . ~ ~ •
_ ' _ - , y. , Y 1 ~ , ` r, ` r` r`t' ` ' a_ . 5-r ' _
4 _ , ! - . ' . . . _ ` ^,i -f - ' ~
a.'S . ~ h ~i~', „ e'
~~~'f' ~ ~ ° ~ , . . - ~ • ~ ~ ' , r . - • _ J
(A
3011 C '
1 4
,
411
,*.I 7o
LS%
Ay ,
, ~ ~
j
~ ..f
~
rq
\ ~r' m ► , ys,~3` ~3ww~5 ~
41W, ~ a
cs sss Z c•toi •
i
° `r
~ ~
Y
I ~ ` \ t
` ~ +`e • r , ~
~ ♦
r : . r - 'T - ~
a ~
0 41~
,
~ ~ ° ' • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
' ~ \ \ , ` f O oNo~ v~vso~
tJ \ ~.s
O'%
~.►1 0 -c- Az~i 3JJ1.rI
f~n~l A' ~i~,,r,r~ iy~ 1 • ~•n` / ~ 01, + ~
op
~ •
F ,bs9 ~ \y~SO ("b 01
~ rt• S1~ 0 ,
O ~ S3 • -o ~ .
t8 ~ C~lI (7
.o o
~ ~ ~ ~ f°l c
AIn1 ~ Hir _r~r~ ►.a~t ~.tn-t i _ v!~ ~-+~1 - ~ ,
9S . L
Nb G.f_ OO br rZ 9I s' tv:P.~
3 '~4.~ ,~`..7 ' ~'~J:11SV~~ ~'.l t ~1 r7~ r ~ . ~ ♦ 1 • ~ , \
~ •~f: ~ ' i" = ~r.: YJ • ~~~t ' ~ ` \ ~ ~
A I:1...~ `i b: ,J :.i • 1 ` o ~ ~
'H.sI L2 ic,it~
. \
19 umw
_
G. , • ~ ~i~~~ ~ J ~I~tt. ~i, . ~ ~ J C ~is..• :
µ
~if. 7V ..u!
Li t ~._~Ol.~ ~l ~ ~ 6 {2~1 \
I:} t 1GHS O.t
: '?a iV~ ,,3 ~
~t7~.tivJ' 1.iV{ .~..i t J~ it~~{ iNi~ ~~~o.r ~ i✓l.1~+,
0~11dNOlnL '_.I;Vt'U3L1AC7'.Ad S! s-;M DiQ
► i^ ~ ~ ' o
~ - J
I
'rRANSNATTON TTTLE INSURANCE COMPA.iTY
NORTH 7 2 0 ARcaNN E
SPOKANE, WAS H I NGTON 99212
PrepareCl for:
Order No.: SH-257939
KJT LLC. Charge ; $175. 00
ATTN; ~EN TUPPER Tax: $14.18
N. 122 RAYMOLY i./
cC: ~SKH. /Jeff LogaIl
FIFTH
P L AT C E R T IF T CA T E
Certificate for filing Plat of :
SUMMEFtFIELD EA.ST SI~TH ADD.
In the rnatter of the subdiva.sian to be subrnitted to Spokane County for
appz'aval, this comgany has examined the recards of Spakane County Auditor' s
and Clerk' s offices, and the records of the Clerk af the United 5tates
District Court halding terrns in said caunty. This certificate is made far
the purpose herein specif~edf and is not to be used as a basis for closing
any transaction. Liability is lirnited to the amount, if any, paid far this
certificate. Fram such examznation, the cQmpany hereby certifies the title
to the following described land, in said SpQkane County, to-wit:
THAT PC7RTION DF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND TFiE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF
SECTIDN 35, TOWNSHIP 26 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, WILLA24E`Y"TE MERIDIAN,
SPOKANE CDUNr!'Y, WASHINGTON, DESCRIBEI] AS FOLLOWS:
COMMEN'CING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ~OT 10, BLOCI~ ~SUMMERFIELD
EAST ACCORDING TO BO{?K 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 9. SAID P4IN'F BEING A
5/8" STEEL FIN FROM WHICH A 5 f81' STEEL PIN A'I" THE NDRTHEAST G`ORNNER
OF PLA'Y` NO. 4 QF WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS ACCORDTNG TO 5OOK 'io,l
OF'' pIrA1'~ ~ PAGE 51, NORTII o °06'02" WEST, A DISfANCE OF 2610.~~
~~~T"
7
THEhICE NORTH 0006'02" WE5T ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF
SUMMERFIELD EAST, A DSSfANCE OF 1121,63 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CL3RNER UF LOT 1, BLOCK 3OF SA1D PLAT;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH OoD6102" WEST C)N THE WEST'ERLY LINE OF
SU1VIMERFlELD EA5T FiFTH ADDITIC3N A Q[STANCE OF 405.00 FEET TO THE
NORT'HWEST CORNER OF LOT 4, BLOCaC 24 OF SAID ADQlTION AND THE ROINT
OF BE~~NNINC;
Thf ENCE CON71N~.~INC NORTH 0006'02" WEST, A D1STAh1CE [1F 399.40 FEET;
[egal cont.
Page 1 of 5
I
c
.
Order No. SH-257939
legal cont.
THENCE NORTH 90000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 130.95 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 84°12132" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.00 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 5°47128" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.21 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.57 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 35.77 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 62001'30" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 233.25 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 80o5013411 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 182.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 67 ° 31'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 155.62 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 76027'10" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 85.09 FEET TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 19 SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH
ADDITION ACCORDING TO BOOK 28 OF PLATS, PAGES 21-22;
THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SUMMERFIELD
EAST FOURTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING FIVE COURSES:
SOUTH 19018'07" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.51 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
372.50 FOOT RADIUS NON TANGENT CURVE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS
SOUTH 13 ° 55'54" EAST;
WESTERLY ON SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7°26'38", AN ARC
DISTANCE OF 48.39 FEET;
SOUTH 68°37'28" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.31 FEET;
SOUTH 21 °22'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET;
SOUTH 0005'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 171.90 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST
CORNER OF LOT 7, BLOCK 23 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIFTH ADDITION ACCORDING
TO BOOK 29 OF PLATS, PAGES 38 and 39;
THENCE WESTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SUMMERFIELD
EAST FIFTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING NINE COURSES:
NORTH 90000900" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 159.82 FEET;
legal cont.
Page 2 of 5
.
Order No. SH-257939
legal cont.
SOUTH 71 ° 11'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.14 FEET;
NORTH 87°55106" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.37 FEET;
NORTH 82 °48'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.15 FEET;
NORTH 72052'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.56 FEET;
SOUTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
NORTH 90000'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.52 FEET;
NORTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET;
NORTH 90000'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN:
K.J.T. INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Washington Limited Liability Company.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos.
46353.9123, 46354.9124.
Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said
parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no
assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3.
3. Reservations contained in deed, recorded on October 20, 1886 under Recording No. 946, as
follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be
ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be
necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal
and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same.
Page 3 of 5
Order No. SH-257939
4. BORDER EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Public and to Spokane County
PURPOSE: Road
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: April 24, 2002
RECORDING NO.: 4718034
5. JOINT NATURAL GAS PIPELINE AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE
EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Avista Corporation
PURPOSE: Construct, operate and maintain electric distribution
line, and necessary fixtures and appurtenances
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: June 19, 2002
RECORDING NO.: 4740419
6. TEMPORARY OFF-SITE TURNAROUND AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Allowing stormwater drainage and/or runoff over and
across herein described lands; Ingress and egress
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: March 27, 2003
RECORDING NO.: 4867461
7. TEMPORARY NATURAL DRAINAGE AND FLOOD RUNOFF EASEMENT AND THE TERMS
AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Spokane County
PURPOSE: Temporary natural drainage and flood runoff; ingress
and egress
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: March 27, 2003
RECORDING NO.: 4867462
8. ANY UNPAID ASSESSMENT OR CHARGES, AND LIABILITY FOR FURTHER ASSESSMENTS
OR CHARGES BY SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1.
Page 4 of 5
Order No. SH-257939
9. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer construction, referred
to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer
services. Please contact the Division of Utilities Billing Section for inforrnation (509) 477-3604.
DATED AS OF January 28, 2005 at 8:00 a.m.
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
BY
For service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Sean Heath, Title Officer
ekh/sac
Page 5 of 5
TCH !S Pt;O:'1DED, CMARC°
{ `;r,r-,,: R ~i:i-O-,'AT1C,\'. iT iS F,40 7 !Nl rPvDED
, ~ 5SQ - J• ~ • ~ ~ N Ob ! l. ~ MA F; L LA? Ci, i
\ 104 ` . r~f ' • , ~ i, ^
ia
` ' _7;i ~ _i:'~
rQ( ° ~ n~c
` ll: JI L 7 Y J
! Ta. C 't , ~ ^~7 ~1 4 ~ Y ~ • + iJ
!T-
\ ~ . . • ",1;`t'~' _ ` ' ' ~ ci..~ . Y
1
1_Y
\ ^ c • i ` •!i 'r'fC '_3C
i
~ Y IL a ~r i C,~~ ~.:tlfA1
..t L 7~ E
/a.I Il s' j~ , *4 '
7 ..,Y ti,° 1 1 r~`.~~. <~..`r'•J~ ;t C'S_. ~ f O AN
.~kl l a~~ ~ ~so ~ ees ~r ~ ► ~ ~,~Q_ :.~a _ _ . _ . 1
(01
r. ~7 /
\ ao ~y
13 s~w ' sT
~
~ ~ a
~
.
01 P~ 1R 3
ti CR ~ Nj O~\
~EP .e~v
l. ~~,o~►-res i
' ~ O' ~ • / ~ i/L \ /OA /IAI~I~~ ` ~
Q~ ~ ~w• ~v ~
•I~ Pw~~ i f- 0~ r~ /tE+ +e ~ ~ ` ~-o~ ~ ~ \
1 t Y Z ~ ~D..~
- - ~ ` ` « ia• 7I6.!'
14 01 ~ ~ , c. .~J ~7
J@r
41
1 ~ 4v 1 ~ -t o
/ OK ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` V ♦ \ ` r r ~ (i ~
1 ~ \ • ~ ~ ~ S'
7~ ~ se \ ' \ 43 1
L...~ ~ - 1
~ ~ • '
~ ~ ~ \ ` ~
~
406 :1 ~ tsY sa
r t \ e \ ~
E`D
~ ~ cn I ME4tF ~ . E
I ~ S''Mr
T - ~ - - -f- -
~ r T `'1 . Q E.~~ 40 , 9ZS
I t►~~'' a ~ h ~ , ~ J - ~Q ~ ' ~
1 1 " Mb s
i y e
~ 94
X
v' iws~ o
i r ~ A 1 ~ ~ ~ •
1r _ ~ fT i.r1 . a . • ~re~/~ • f . • w~ . l ~ . - w ` ' Y +.J~JI~~
, 1 eAr4 , <1}'r. + I'ri- ~ ' ~ ' . ' , t _ = i { ~ ' L • _ j '
:t~~'^., ~ ~ . 'R~i . ~ ~ . r e: ~ x _ f , ~ ~ . .
• ' t' t'ht 1 Y, . y' , ' - r . ' _ + , J... ' . . • , " . ~ l / . - ` ' ' . . .
~ ^ ' ~ _ ~ ' _ `~YI r ~ ~ _ 1 " , y-•• ~ ~ 3i ~ ~ ~ ~r
Ls , e - - . J ' " , _ . - " » _ c ~ - , s n`• e '~S y~ s , ~
~1 ~ ~ • W~~ti ~ ~ J~Y~ 1
.1h'•,R% '`4' i. t1 ~ -•~r,►-'.~j _ r t' r ; , Y. _ ' yi' , ~ ~ ` , ; ~ 1 . ~ r ' •
`T ya; r! • c `~~'T.. [t- -'e t ti _ ~
~ c .t~ ~.la:,a:_c._ .'~'.~"a _ r: K'.~,_..'X. _.~•.r~ . a~ . . ~ ~ ~ i . . > -r . . ; -
SCITY00
p6koaone
Valle
Y
11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 ♦ Spokane Valley WA 99206
509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 ♦ cityhall@spokanevalley.org
March 23, 2004
Mr. Ken Tupper
8225 North Division Street
Spokane, Washington 99204
RE: Notice of Decision for Extension of Time for Preliminary Plat Approval for
Summerfield East Preliminary Plat
Dear Mr. Tupper:
The Current Planning Division received your Extension of Time Application on
December 22, 2003 for a proposed one year time extension for Summerfield East 6ffi
Addition Final Plat (City of Spokane Valley Reference No. PE-1206-78) located west of
Burns Road, north of Olympic Avenue, approximately 250 feet east of Bannen Road, and
approximately 500 feet south of Forker Avenue in the South Half of Section 35,
Township 26 North, Range 44 East Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington,
tax parcel numbers 46354.9050, 46353.9074, 46352.9052, 46352.9066, and 46351.9049.
Preliminary plat approval for PE 1206-78 (Summerfield East) was originally granted on
January 30, 1979. This current request represents the twelfth extension request for the
previously approved preliminary plat. In your current extension request application, you
specify that the basis for your request is due to the fact there is an additional 109 lots to
be platted under the preliminarythe fifth phase (Summerfield East Sth Addition) was
recorded on January 30, 2004 and additional time is needed to proceed with final platting
for the sixth phase (Summerfield East 6th Addition) consisting of twenty-two (22)-lots.
The City of Spokane Valley has completed a substantive review of your proposal
pursuant to the applicable regulations of Chapter 12.100.118 (Extensions of Time) of the
City of Spokane Valley Interim Subdivision Ordinance, and has also routed the request to
appropriate internal and external review bodies. Pursuant to the submitted information, it
is determined that the applicant meets the criteria for allowance of an extension of time
according to 12.100.118(2)(b). You are hereby notified that your request for an extension
of time is APPROVED subject to the following conditions of approval:
1. This letter grants a maximum one (1) year time extension from the date of this letter.
The preliminary plat approval for PE-1206-78 (Summerfield East Preliminary Plat)
shall therefore expire on March 23, 2005.
2. For additional extensions of tirne an application form and supporting data for time
extension must be submitted at least thirty (30) calendar days prior to the expiration
of the preliminary plat approval extension request.
Please be advised that all conditions of approval from the original preliminary plat
approval and all previously authorized time extensions are still applicable.
Pursuant to Section 12.100.126 (Appeals) of the City's adopted "Subdivision Ordinance,
a written appeal of this Notice of Decision shall be filed with the City of Spokane Valley
Community Development Department within fourteen (14) calendar days after the date
the notice of the decision is mailed. The appeal deadline is at 5:00 pm on April 6th,
2004.
Pursuant to Section 7 of Ordinance No. 57, the Hearings Examiner shall conduct a public
hearing on appeals of administrative decisions made by the Current Planning Division.
Pursuant to Section 11 of Ordinance 03-081, the Hearings Examiner's decision on the
appeal shall be final and conclusive and shall have the effect of a final decision of the
City Council.
Please contact me at (509) 688-0046 or hkauer@spokanevalley.org if you have any
questions or need additional information.
Sincerely,
Heather Kauer
Planning Technician
CC: USKH, Lisa Frey
City of Spokane Valley Engineering Department
■ John Hohman, P.E. Senior Engineer
■ Sandra Raskell, P.E., Assistant Engineer
■ Don Ramsey, Traffic Engineer
City of Spokane Valley Building Department - Tom Scholtens
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Information Services; Jim Red
Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority - Ron Edgar
Spokane County Transit Authority - Gordon Howell
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health District - Steve Holderby
Trentwood Irrigation District
East Valley School District
Encl: 12th Extension of Time for Preliminary Approval letter dated March 23, 2004.
02I23/2004 15:32 5093280423 USKH INC PAGE 03
,
~ J ~
x X Mae
x 7%
~ IqC~ A~~ ~ w S~ ~
R ~ e0
1eN
e
~
qURNS toAD_
_
rj ! o ~
~ ~ ~ I I
~ \ , Z'• -~`AH ~ ~ 'G, (
` ` ~ o~ ~Y►-~ ~ ~ ~rc ~ 3~ I
;,9'~ ~ a u I 1.O t~1G » ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ _ 1... ~.~S.,Ga ./r ~ p ~ I
t l~
-
wr~'~ I I
~
, `
`\1
Xti
I ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 r! ~.iJJf.J 71uJyJNJ~~N`~
~ ~ ~'____,•,`~e_'_"_ ~ w! \ ~ •x !x o r =RIn ^c
~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1.~ I~ I r sx A~ sa p~-pp~cc, Ar.IS~aaaa~~
; ~ ~ I it~1~ ~~i`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Id
' ' ' g ~ ►
'1 I ! 1 ~ I
~ . ; , ~ , r ' J •as~ '
~ ~ °
5= / i i ~ ~ 1 l
~ '
~ / - i]p
1 ~ , % • ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ I ~ a 4
i R , . ~~~•r ~ „
/
tA
.
_Az:--~- ~ ~ ♦
- I - ~ 3 I ~ ~ o, ~
~ L _rws- ~ -~~---~5 ~n ~ ~ _
; o •p ~ f ~ rc N W ~ \ ~
~ I ~ ~c ~ - ' ~ I ~ ~ I . z ' a ~~j ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ \ x.ro.ooo • I ~
~ I AM ~
~C rnDE[ ~.`0.~D ~ ~
: - ✓J A '
~aflQ ~ ~ ~ I~ .aaF~ ~ ~3 5 ~ I
1 ~
~ ~ '
usKH rNC - 02/23/2004 15: 32 5093280423
. - ~
. -
i ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ •
w1
W
~i
~ ~ e..
M~
a~o ~ Mu
~K~P . V
4 c'
~~y pp 9 j~~ 9 ~i y~~ oC
. „
~eSO ~e c~{~ L~
w w
~
lit
►`g_ y ~~r~ ''y ~
q nT9ys~3"~L~~s
g
a ~n
u ~7A~ ~Al g~~~ IIp~~~Q M
i
I`~$'6 xal
.
2~z~"t
g$3~~
tfsv ~r r ,~~cq r~ ~NL y3~ys eA~ ~ ~ lir~ - 71 ~ Ag
4'p;~~~~1Q~~Q a~
Pha . ~t~ ~ •~~N~ ~L~~ x?~~A s j
~'3
~c~~~~` y ~P{~~~, ~~j ~ ~ 99r^
n g a By r
~K u
~K~E~
'~+3~D' ~~5~ r8~i~~C•1~ "S
~~~eNc,
.~,~~.'~~N~
~i~ ~'16
~~,1
~ r ~ A
a~ ~ ~ ~ , ~~~~i~
g
jU 11 r
i s
r. r. ~ ~ Li. p.~ f 1~• A W'
F~a3
t v?Gl~rl~
AcNt~+:~ f' rl~~~ ^i,~'~G~^° ~
^I i
n ~ '
-<5 JP4
t• ~ ? y ^ b w ~ ~ ~ a'~~ S, ' ~ x Q ~
E4~ Et~`
d ~
_ ~9 ~~}4 Ipy~~ a gM
a y e ~ 6~
~'R „ QW ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~b~ a~Pz -~re~
5 c , 3 h
o~
g ~ q r
a h y 5' ~ ~ 7 d ~ b p?~~
"
`~~y g ~ ga G ~~~za
~B 1G . • ~a 9 ~ ~ b '~f I < • i I t ~ ~ G ~ a~ 1
$~9 va
t I a 9 ' W a~I~ b ~j c ~~l D~
ob
~ 3 1~ ~ a n ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ,x.~~~ a3~ J
1; 1% IC
~`►~~§~~~~14
I _
~ .
,
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
NORTH 7 2 O ARGONNE
S POKANE , WASH I NGTON 99212
Prepared for:
Order No.: 3H-257939
KJT LLC. Charge: $175.00
ATTN: REN TUPPER , Tax: $14.18
N. 122 R.AYMOND
cc : Wyatt Engineering Inc. SPQKANE CO~NTY
P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E FEB 21 2003
Certificate for filing Plat of : DfVISIONOFPLANNING
SUMMERFIELD EAST SIXTH ADD.
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's
and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States
District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for
the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing ~
any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this
certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit:
THAT PORTION OF THE 30IITHEAST QIIARTER AND THS 30LITHWEST QIIART£R OF
SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 26 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST, WILLAMFTT$ MERIDIAN,
SPORANE COLTN'TY, WASHINGTON, DSSCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
M
CONIIKENCING AT THF SOUTFIW83T CORNER OF LOT 10 , BLOCK 1 SIII►MFRFIELD
EA3T ACCOR.DINf3 TO BOOR 17 OF PLATS, PAf3S 9, 3AID POINT B$ING A
5/ 8" STEEL PIN F'ROM WiICH A 5/ 8" 3TEEL PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER
OF PLAT NO. 4 OF WE3T FARMS IRRIC3ATLD TRACTS ACCORDING TO BOOK "O"
oF PLATS, pAGE 51, BEAxs NORTH o°06'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2610.05
FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PLAT OF
SUMMERFIELD EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1121.63 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3 OF SAID PLAT;
THENCE CONTINUiNG NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF
SUMMERFIELD EAST FIFTH ADDITION ACCORDING TO BOOK _ OF PLATS,
PAGES , A DISTANCE OF 405.00 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT
4, BLOCK 24 OF SAID ADDITION AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 0° 06'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 399.40 FEET;
legal cont.
I
Page 1 of 4
~
Order No. SH-257939
legal cont.
SDUTH 71 ° 11'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.14 FEET;
NORTH 87 ° 55'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.37 FEET;
IVORTH 82048'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.15 FEET;
NORTH 72052'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.56 FEET;
SOUTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.52 FEET;
NORTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET;
NORTH 90000'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN:
< FIVE FIFTY, LLC., ~ Washington Limited Liability Company.
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos.
46354.9050, 46353.9074.
Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said
parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no
assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood lrrigation District No. 3.
3. Reservations contained in deed, recorded on October 20. 1886 under Recording No. 946, as
follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be
ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be
necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal
and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same.
Page 3 of 4
Order No. SH-257939
4. EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3
PURPOSE: Underground pipeline of the District for the
transportation and delivery of water, of a size not
exceeding 12 inches in diameter
- AREA AFFECTED: 10 feet on either wide of the following centerline;
commencing on West lie of this property 1760.8 feet
North of South section line; thence Eat 15 feet to the
Point of Beginning; thence East 645.4 feet; thence
South 1297.4 feet
DATED: January 12, 1966
RECORDED: January 17, 1966
,RECORDI NG NO.: 171591 C
,
5. BORDER EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
GRANTEE: Public and to Spokane County
PURPOSE: Road
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: April 24, 2002 RECORDING NO.: 4718034
6. JOINT NATURAL GAS PIPELINE AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE
EASEMENT AND THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS THEREOF:
~ . .
GRANTEE: Avista Corporation
PURPOSE: Construct, operate and maintain electric distribution
line, and necessary fixtures and appurtenances
AREA AFFECTED: This and other property
RECORDED: June 19, 2002
RECORDING NO.: 4740419
7. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer construction, referred
to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer
services. Please contact the Division of Utilities Billing Section for information (509) 477-3604.
DATED AS OF January 28, 2003 at 8:00 a.m.
TRANSNATIOf\' TITLE I SURANCE COMPANY
BY
For service on this Aer call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Sean Heath, Title Officer
sc
Page 4 of 4
Vj4 -
~
. ~
. ~ 58 sQ 6 ~ .
qi) ~04 ~
~ C e^~ ` o ~ •
v ~ +41 ~O
. '
1;5- - ~►~r ~ ° _
1-3 ' st
Qo O4~ ~ ' • ~
o ~
~ st i~•,u rrwref~ ~ . .
O~f tfvaX rds pe
a
r q ~ w
Aya • ,
,16.f•
, c~ • y--~~
~ ~ G ~ • _ _ ~T
t~ ~ ~~•ro•~
yElt ~ ~ \ ~ \ •Y 3~9s ~
' F p ~r +'c E R ' • , ~ ~ ~ tn.~~ l ,p C
~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~
.
~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~3 1 ¢ i ~ • , ~ - ,
1 K 'w.
~ 'r ~ ~1 ~ ' ~ \ 9 1~,°~
~t ~
~'.J
t .o • ~ • ,.o.~=,~.~ .
1. s'
~
♦ , ~ ~ 4 ,
~ a
. s
~ ~F ~E " i ~J ~ .
zn 5 Y
1154~ ~
~ - , ~ • . . ' „ ~ ~ ~J
...5 ~ ~ ~7 ' • ' + ~
~ ~,V~ y t v~ ~ ~ d , 1 ~ ~ . . _ , ~Q ' ~.-~,rr•. . .
~ a ~ ~ ~ a 1 l ~ ~ ~ , " ~ .r ' ~r►~ : ~ ~ . JK * .
~ ~ ; l ~K ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ . ~►Q° ~ ~ ~ . ~ _
'`'A
~ r L~ r t
4 ■ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ` ` . , ''`N~ v ' ~ + ` ! `~-i~" ?y ~ F~ y " , tl
, ty
` ~Y ~ ~ N ` y r t ~ r r~ ~e . `N ` • f~ - r ~ , y ~
, 1~ ✓ % [ ~t 1' ~ t ~ ~ > C 3 ~1
iv ~ ~~'y s~ • r r :iY~ rYw' ~ ~ y ~ i ~ %1 i . T f ~
,,,e
:
;7' 4 . > i^ .w•. t ~ ' ~ ~ , 1. " ~ T rsr°~ ~ • , , . > , . , 9~ t t ~
t1 ~.I ~ 1 2 ♦ ~ ~ ft t: h.dJ .
1 m: ~ ~ 8 t ~ i j ~ tiSMl .l~e
~
l t a 1~. P 'y " tY f Y' n' .
' !
- 458$714
Z012MI o
04;5~
~
TRAN.SNtIT11}1V Tltl F 1MS !Y? pD g1d ~ %danp Ca. IN
AFTER RECORDINa RETURN TO:
WITHERSPOON, KELLEY, DAVENPORT 8t TOOLE PS
ATiN: Stanley R Schultz
422 W. Riverside Avenus
I 100 U S.BANK BLDG.
SPOKt1NE, WA 99201
~4CA24-0
COVER SHEET FOR: Statutory Warranty Deed ~
Grantor: Bruce Butler and Judith A. $utler, husband and wife; May Ann Wilharm; Willard
Hewson and Loretha Hewson, husband and wife; and Kenneth Tupper and Sharon
Tupper, husband and wife
Grantee; Five Fifly, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of Section 35, T.26 North, R44 EWM
Full Legal on Page: 6 and 7
Tax Pazcel No: 46354.9022; 46351.9005; 46351.9049; 46352.9052; 46352.9066;
46353.9074; 46354.9050
. "
-4588714
P~18~20Di o04;5bP
AFI'ER RECORDING RE7URN TU: T~W~~Tifl~l TTTI F TNC M V S1a M cnnkanm r.n Pl
STANLEY R. SCHLJLTZ
Withecspoon, Kclley, Davcnport & Took, P.S.
422 W. Riversidc Avcnuc
1100 U.S Bank BuildIng
Spokane, WA 99201
S'I'.ATUT4RY W 'I'Y DEED
THE GRANTORS, BRUCE B. BIJTLER and NDITH A. BUTLER, Husband and Wife, as to an undivided
fifty percent (50%) interest; and MARY ANN WILHARM, as her sole and separate properry as to a twenty-five percent
(25%) undivided interesi; and WILLARD A. HEWSON and LORETHA HEWSON, husband and wife, as to an
undivided one-eighth (1A) interest; and KENNETH J. TUPPER and SHARON L. TCJPPER, husband and wife, as to
an undivided one-eighth ('A) interest for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable
consideration, conveys and wamdnts to FIVE FIFTY, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, the following
described real estate, situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, together with all after acquired title af
the GRANTOR(S) therein: See attached legal description set forth fully in Exhibit "A".
!Li SUBJ ECT TO 1) Reservations contained in deed recorded on October 26, 1 S$6 under Recording No. 946;
N
S:. 2) Right to make necessary slopes for cuts or flls as granted by Qeed recorded as Document
u~ No. 432623;
r 3) Easernent granted to Spokane Valley Land and Water Co. as recorded on May 26, 1911
; ' under Recocding No. 324569;
~ 4) Easement granted to the United Staies of America as recorded on January 19,1943 under
~
Record'wg No. 572309A;
5) Easement granted to Trentweod Irrigation District No. 3 as recorded on January 17,1466 '
m
under Recording No. 171591 C;
6) Easement ganted to Tnland Power and Light Co. as recorded on June 26, 1978 under
Recording No. 7806260065; and
7) Other Easements, restrictions and reservations of record.
IN WiTNESS WHEREUF, this instrument has been executed this JCI%ay of ..J~[:t ~ , 2001.
~
r 19RUCE B. BUTLER ~ 1UD A. BUTLER'
O
ro
~
u
~
Cl-
c~
.y
l0
c %.sxxs\TUreEx\rsvc Fixr u.c,wd w.,wty Deed ►►pa
_Lc,RETHA HEWSON
WILLARD A. HEWSON
- MARY N WILHARM KENNETH J. TUPPER
~'•cz>~
~
SHARON L. TUPPER
STA3`E OF WASHINGTON )
)ss.
County of Spokane )
[ certify that I lQiow or have satisfactory evidence that BRUCE B. BUTLER is the individual who appeared
trefore me, and said individual acknowledged to me tbat he signed this instrument, and he acknowledged it as his free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrumenL
DATED this day ofA& 2001.
~ .
QATSyNOTAR PUJ~bI g F AS GTON
+ O~
•;yg10N 6L I1~ Residing at:
% U-: ~ NOT~ Y .cf~~ tMy Appointrnen Expires; _
1 ' (0}
0 ~ ` VgUv
STATE OF WASHiNGTON 0~
9-~A
Counry of Spokane
OF WqS~
I certify that I know vr have satisfactory evidence thai JUDITH A. BUTLER is the individual who appeared '
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me that he signed this instrument, and he acknowledged it as his free
and voIuntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this inshnament.
DATED this / day of ' , 2041.
AZII
FOR WASHINGTON
OT Y *Expi
PATS/y Residing agjp~y'•.O M
y Appoi
S (6 '),a
STATE OF WASHINGTON ; V.~ NOTI~y
; •)ss. ~UC i
County of Spokane
~
. ~
1~' 13.0~,.; r
~ ~
QVWAS
G lSRS1711FPERire Fdiy 11,C12nd Wwemy Dad wpd
4588714
, P0~18j2001 ~ 44;~6P
TAaNCNNJItTfiN TTTI C iNS M W11 314 M Snnkana Cn Yllt
. 4588714
- ~18120 i o4:W
_ TA1fiSNbT1f1Y TTTI F iWS (Yt wn 4l4 m Senlrat» Cn N
I certifythat I know or havesatisfactory evidence that WILLARD A. HEWSON is the individual who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me tbat he signed this instrument, and he acknowledged it as his free and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument. -
,
DATED this 10 day of ~ G'-~(' , 2001. `
~.;;1:~,~ •
NOTARY PbtLIC IN AND F WASHIIVQ~ ••.,;bJ
N
Residing at: _s~~t~LQ.~VI~- v-
My Appointmen Expires; ~?U ~Or~~, ~ = `~~j ,e~ ~o
1. 'd►~d ~ w
STATE OF WASHINGTON
j r
)SS. ~~1~c1~~i•',l~
County of Spokane
''•~.1~~~
1 certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that LORETHA HEWSON is the individual who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me that he signed this inswment, and he acknowledged it as his free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument.
DATED this ! V day of 2001.
~
NOTARY L I ITt AND Fj,ti, , Residing at: ~ ~4;
' My Appointme t Expires; ~ ~Do -
STATE OF WASHINGTON
.
)ss. .J/S= :~~~r ,i~
County of Spokane
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that MARY ANN WILHARM is the individual who
appeared before me, and said individual acknowledged to me thzt he signed this instivment, and he acknowledged it
as his free and voluntar}► act,_ foX the uses and purposes mentioned in tfiis instrumenL
DATED this *7 dsy of 2001
~mM04
•
♦
~4~,•~~ssto» ~I~ . _ ~
jNOT Y Ul!~IX IN`A FOR WASH3NGTON
NOjAPY Residing at:
~ . ~
M A ointime t Ex ires;
N : PU8L1G ; 2~ Y PP P C'C~:3
.p~
i q •,,c~ `
.
~
~
~i ~ i4:...•'
STA'TE OF WASHINGTON F 1NAS
/ollltll
County of Spokane )
T certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that KENNETH 1. TUPPER is the individual who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me tbat he signed this instrurnent, and he aclrnowledged it as his free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument.
G 15MTUFPER\Frve Fiffy LLC12nd Wtmaty Deod wpd
• 4588714
o~1j$lz~i al59
taANautrnH Ttti c tkq rn m sia m sMtarw N a
DA~1:r day of NUA , 2001.
E ~
~ • , y , - V , ! ( ~,~4 ~~,~,~C
♦ • ~ ~~r, n • ,
4y , ♦
NOTq~ ~►;N NO RY PUBL iN AND~FOR~VASHINGTON
Re3iding at ~
. ~~L~~ Xe
pMY APPointrnent Expires;
•
~ , ~ - STAT*vbNDN 1 )ss.
County of Spokane
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence thaf SHARON L. TUPPER is the individuai who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me that she signed this instrument, and she acknowledged it as her free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument.
~
--7
DATED this )t' day of i.'S , 2001.
1 .
E E.
Q►A~N lYj ~ii N ARY PU$L~ C IN AI~'b FOR V1~`ASH~GTON
♦ . ~t~on ~ / ~ Residing at: ~1►
♦ • . ~ - c +•N M A ointment Ex ires•
NOTAR y ~ V Y PP P ~
.
~
~ w
.
. ~
• o
. ~
,~~jp; ~
11 11 H
d\SRSITUPPER\Frve Fifty LLA2nd Warranty Dcod wpd
R~ .
. • 4588714
• , .
- P~812041 04:55F
TFaNIMTTnM Ttti F INC rn wn fld m sm*anA r.o wa
~
L,EGAL DESCRIPTION :
A portion of Secti4n 35, Township 26 North, Range 44
East, W.M., more particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at the South quarter corner of Sectioa 35;
thence South 89052100„ West, 350.00 feet; thence North
30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning, also common -
with the Southwest corner of the Trentwood Slementary
School Tract; thence South 89052100" West 311.10 feet;
thence North 0005138" West 2610.08 feet along the East
boundary of WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS to a point of the
East-West centerline of Section 35; thence South
8905304311 west 1327.40 feet along Che East-West
centerline of Section 35; thence North 000611711 west 9.51
feet to a point of curve on the Southerly right of way of
Forker Road; thence along the arc of a 1401,87 foot
radius curve to the right a distance of 172.23 feet
through a Delta Angle of 7002 ~ 20" , thence South 891042' 41"
East 489.07 feet; thence along the arc of a 507.66 foot
radius curve to the left a distanre of 270.59 feet; :
through a Delta Angle of 30032'21"; thence North
59044' S9" East 526.59 feet; thence along the arc of a
2894.77 foot radius cwcve to the left a distance of
630.55 feet through a Delta Angle of 12028'S70; thence
North 47016102" East 2.72 feet; thence along the arc of
a 794 . 00 foot radius curve to the left a distance of
63 . 12 f ee t through a Del ta Angle of 4033' 18" to intersect
the Southerly right of way of Prog=ess Road; thence along
the Southerly and Weeterly Right of Way of Progress Road
South 75012'52" East 677.20 feet; thence along the arc of
a 182.29 foot radius curve to the right a distance of
124.88 feet through a Delta Angle of 39015'040; thence
South 350571480 East 948 . 32 feet; thence along the arc of
a 288.38 f oot radf us curve to the right a dietance of
183.13 feet through a Delta Angle of 360238070; thence
South 0025'19" West 2198.29 feet to a point on the
Northerly right of way of Wellesley Avenue; thence along ,
the North right of way of Wellesley Avenue North
89056'40" West 935.42 feet to a point cqmmon with the
Southeast corner of the Trentwood Elementary School
Tract; thence North 903.42 feet along the Fast boundary
of school tract; thence West 700.00 feet along the North
boundary of school tract; thence South 903.89 feet along
the West boundary of school tract to the True Point of
Beginning;
(legal description continued)
~ 4588714
P05;18J2401 ~ 04:5P
1AAN.STUTTttN. TiTI F TILq M wn 414.m snnkaF& co. R -
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (cont.):
EXCEPT a parcel of land in the North one-half of said
_ Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East, W.M.,
particularly described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the East-West centerline of Section
35, that is North 89053142" East, a distance of 1412.87 feet
from the west quarter corner of Section 35; thence continuing
North 89053042" East, a diatance of 60.00 feet; thence North
13050' S6" West, a distance of 38.91 feet to a point on the
Southerly right of way of Forker Road; thence along the
Southerly right of way of Forker Road, along the arc of a
507.66 foot radius curve to the right, a distance of 58.31
feet, through a Delta Angle of 6034153", the long chord of
which bears South 76009102" West, a distance of 58.28 feet;
thence South 13050'56" East, a diatance of 24.66 feet to the
Point of Beginning;
AND EXCEPT Platted Portions;
,
.
AND EXCEPT any portion of the Northeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter lying Southerly and
Easterly of Forker Road; -
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of washington.
SND OY sCIMQL$ "A"
*ss**s~~~t*:t#si*~~*~i~►#~r#t~~~**sss*~~,t~~ss~fwf*f+►ti~*~~►~►~r
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCB ONLY:
(Parcel Nos. 46354.9022, 46351.9005, 46351.9049, 46352.9052,
46352.9066, 46353.9074 and 46354.9050)
(Ptn. 35-26-44)
~
• ~~y ~ ~ ~ ~ S ~ ~ t ~
~ ~ ~ j ~ ~ • ~
~b a , ~ i ~ s ~ ~ ~ i, • '3' ~ ~ ~ • ?
-
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ^ ~ ~ ` •ti
: - ~ ~ a • : ^
-
r ~ ` • ~ ~`~~~s ~y -
,
~ ~
s 3
r, :F. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~a ~ ~ a ~ ~ " ,
`x
~ ~ ~ ► ~ c ' ~ ~ ~ k~ 1 a ~ t~ ~ $ 2 r -
-QL
` d 3 3~ ~ ¢ '
•4 ~ k a .e $ .c~~s ~ 1 9 ~1~
.a_~ - ~ •~t+" ~ V
s• ~ •
R
~
~ . _ ~ .
• S%n fi
~s a~~~~ ~ ~16.3~.~
~ ~303 ~3~ b~ ~ ~ ~a. ~ ~ ~
- , , ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ j -~~a~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . X b .6~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~4
-6
~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ aa ab~~.~ , 3~ ~3
~ • ~ ~3 e~~ ~ ~ 3 i ~ # J
• 3 ~ ~ ~ ~~~3 ~~~3 3 ti~~ ~ ~1 ~ t _.Y
_ ~ ~ ~ ~3~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
• ~ ~]~a` I . $ i t
rt_• ~ ~ a: ~~~~s~ ~ IIb?~ ~ , ~ . ~ ~
_Is's~~3
b~~$g
L A ~ A~~~~~ ~ ~s •~a~~ 3 ~ ; *5~ ~Is~~
f ss tg ! ~►3~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 _ j ~ ~ ~ ti 3, ~ ~
s3~~
~j ~ 6+ ,~z, ~ a'~ ~ ~ • , ~ ' g ~ -3 F .2
~ ~ ;"s~~ s ~ E~"t ~1 , ,
JI~Q I
~ r
./b. °
- - ~ 91.' ~ ~
. • 6--E.4.SF'.A4~1~' DEED
, . - -
and i.n con ; tratien ot the benefzts to be derivacS by the qrantor from said
+ ' rli.ne, tht~ unclersigned, WALTLR A. MID'c1ZSON, a sinFle n,si, c;oes 'r.ereU}, grant anci C
` • `,convey unto T'RLNTI`+OQD IRRICATTON DISTRICT NCI. 3, an i.rri~atio» district of the StatE C=
y' • o`f Washington, its successors and assigns, a perpetual"right-of-kay and oasenent on
. 'the~ following clcscribed land situated in Spokane Cou , 5tzte o5 lti'ashington, to"
n` - construct+ reconstruct, operate, ttnd maintain z w pipeline and apuurtenances, as
hefeinafter provided, ta-tdt;
- - - - - -
A strip of lattt~, be~,ng that ortion--of BON:~.IE L~A A RE TPAc'TS, a platted '
~~.M_. ~ are~ i.n tho South tialf o£ ec xOn's~, ownsl~~.p 26 Norfih, Range 44 E.K'.D~.,
accarBina to the plat theroof ticoxded in tlie o£f,ice oiE the Snokane CoUhtj% ,
• Aucittor, lyinc; az► eiCher sicle o£ the centex line as hereina.Cter descrxbed- "
" and igclueled between•two lini;sugarallel to the center line, said parallel .
I~~i~'each lyi'~g te~ di"stai~Lt~e~`~uYed at Yight angles° to the, fol'lowfng `
; • - ~ desc4bed center line; Seginriing at the south quarter corner of Section S5~ ;
Tdwnship 26 Aiarth, 2ange `44 E.V.M.; thencc South 89° 50-1/2' 4test 661.05 fest;
`r thencit Nortli U°I0-1/2' Nest 1760.8 feet; thence North 39°SO-1/21 F.ast 15 feet
r, ?
ta A !point wTi3.ch is true point of beginning; thence continnuing Marth 89°SO-]/Z'
Ea.st 645.4 feQt, nore or IeSs, to a point on thg north-south center line of said
'4~ecL~btl 35; thence SdutA 89050•1/2' "st 1:97.4 feet, more or less, to a patnt •
- on the «est right-of-way li,ne of Progress Road.
UpAn said ~strip af land the grantee district, its successors ar►d assigns, shall liaveI
-th& g8rpetual right and privilege of constructing, reconstructing, operating, ropairing
and maYnt2iriing an underground pipeli.ne of the dxstrict _ f.ox the tranSVOrtation. and
a _ delrvery of ivater, Cf a size not exceeding 12 inches in diametcr.
~ • , "
I7n the exercise of this easeznent the grantee district sha13 avoid daruaoe to crops a.nd
~aftes to the extent rEasonnbly pussi,ble and shall pay reasonable value ,ox wnv,,crops
SoWally d`estroYec1 or damaSed in the exercise of this easemcnt. ekny fer.ces renoved
or=damaged shall be rePlacecl. I± the parti.es are unable to agree as to the amou.ht
r-pf'°dAmages La l:e paid, the sar.Ee shall be resolvcu vy arvitration wthereb,, eacii p4rty
ikastes one arbiter. thase two arbiters naine a thz-rd arbiter and the three axbiters thus
.;r;°Aajted slialj reach a:Idetermination by,ma}oxity VOtB, whicli said determination snalx be
~ ' ; r• -kccbpfed hk the parties. -
, • N p t r Y .
Th-~_:provisions Of t~15 iiistrument shall Ue binciin~ upan any lcssee or tenant of the
Y: . ,px•e*ises' af k~hich the striF of land herei.n clescribed is a Part. The payment of
t;. Cxop, damages by the grantee to the tenant or lessee shall constitvte perfoztnamce or
t-he'arantee's oLli9ation to pay crop damages hereunaer, ancl the divisior. of saia
pa. *ent xot crop ctamages shaI1 be a matter to be hanclled betv,een the grantor as ,
°1dAdlord" anci his tenant or lessect.
,
n~ ~ • ~
IP" the making of any excaY3ti4n in the exercise of tliis easement the grantee district shall restore the surface of the ground Co the condition it was in nrior to the,'y .
.'~xtwati0ri, as nearly as reasonably possible.
. •
`;Fhe undersYgnecl gratttor agrees La Gonstruct no perinanent irz:provements, except fences
¢n `said,stxip of land herein uescribed.
- .
f, ,3 SubjecL.only ta the grant herexn made, the possession and use of said stxip of,land s~~1l remain in the grantor, his hei~s, legal representatives and assigns. - •
~c, ' ''`ti', .
The undersigued ti.arrants Ch;it he is the owner of the pzer,~ises o; «hicii the strip ox
, laiid herea.n describecl is apsrt, and tliat he is outliorized to execute this irstrument.
The right-~of-way and easement herei,n convaysd shal l be binding uF.on and inure to-the
: henefit d£ the ra'rtfes hereto, their heirs, successors, iegal representiatives 3a0"*
assigns,~
, i$ 9143ft T~m c~e ~
~ ~ j'-~
~Ct
1690
~
, . .
yr
. . a
` .
. 1
, 1t7ITT1ESS the haiid and seal of the unc:ersi~neu ~ras~tor, tliis
• " • de o£ 9eeemb e, iids'. . Q-.vc.,..y ~966,
~ ' ~ ' .
~
(Seal)
,
, _ ~ -
ss.
~ ;"s •t tGG~ w ~ ~ ~
,
I, the undexsi„gliecl, a ::otary Publi~ ' ~
di~:~ereb~y, ;bn4 th3s,,~ ~~~t!"~ ~day o£ Be~ee+~cbe~c,= 3~9~6; Y
~i~i►~~ona~I~-appe~re=c~€~before A~FI)t~LSOiV, 'a single nran; to m`e' Knbwn'to ~:r .
b6 ,:the ~ttc~ividual descri~bec2 ih and t~1~a exeetited the w~.thin instrwnent, ~nd y.
,a~~owled&d that he signed and sealed thq same as hzs frEe and voluntary act and deed,
A;r-the useg and purpdses therei,n mentioned. ,
. ; .
, .
` GIVNE under my hand and officinl saal the day and e t ab e writfien. ~
,r .
.d
.`r ~ ,L , ' ~n-- ,
~„j~ ~ i a~ ` ~ ,
Notary Publi:c .
~ • r~ '",v ,
L• ~ C
i
, -a . i. ? - 4Y'+'~1. , " J" : -S'•/ ~s~ '
F~r~~~:`~S,y``~•la4,i.1}~~t+ - _ - I
-fL -
:A ' - `'_,,w ..~x ,
Y . • _ ~ . . ~ ~
Iw . J
`l• ~ iv i~
; ~ t S~ ~ c _ . ) , > ~ , ' • i j ^ ~
"t , 0 'S't
*LY ~t'~ ~ ' - • p . .
>
l?'^ t"~ ~5 ~f V~ ' rt~ t Y•
< ' ~ + ~ " 1 .
!
~r •'i.♦ , . ,
~ a • ' . . ~
` ~ ~',a n ' t + : ~ ' ~ • • _
~ j ; 1k~ J t :
Tf;` ~ , % . , r f:•K ' ` ' ' r .
s p ♦t~~ ~ r ~ ' ~ ~ `"'t ,i l ~ ~ ~ ~ 'y~„
~ ~t~ ~ °r' t'~~^~ ~y'~.~,a.t;+Lt~,,`~' `~e+ ~i ~ ~ ' '~r-;° M " ' • , ` ~ , .
~ • ~ .
' ' +s
, • • ~.cLi ' ` ~ ~ r
y , ~ ~ „ • .
~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' '
. ° . . .
1 4
. . y ~ . .
. . v '
i . ~ .
- ~ Yt • , , , .
• _ - 7
<
~ . ,a .
- -
4740419
. 06l1. 912~ t1~5(A
GIflROll EAS $23.00 SpokarEe Co. WA
Return Address:
Avista Corporation R- L ELu"se Tu EX0W Real Estate Department ~ !9• 20 O Z"
P. O. Box 3727 ~~tylwm
.
Spokane, WA 99220-3727 BY _
JOINT NATURAL GAS PIPELINE
AND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION LINE EASEMENT
For and in consid tion of Mutual Benefts, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
S,S 0 L(. G F► Yo, i, L C.) ,~~L , having mailing address of
1..Z 2 1V ~a.~ mo 5 W P~, the undersigned, "Grantor(s)", hereby grant(s),
convey(s) and warrant(s) to the AVISTA CORPORATION, "Grantee", a Washington
Corporation, its successors, and assigns, and assorted other Franchised Utilities, their respective
successors and assigns, a pergetual, non-exclusive easement on, over, undex, along and across,
real property identified by Assessor Parcel #(s) 4c061 d being located in
the South half (S%z) of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East, W. Sgokane County,
State of Washington, described as follows:
See Eachibit "A" attached hereto for descriptions of Parcel 1 and Parcel2
1. PURPOSE. Grantee shall have the right to construct, reconstract, operate, maintain,
repair, relocate, protect, and replace, a natural gas distribution 11ine and assorted natural gas
services, together with all necessary fixtures and appurtenances, and ari underground electric
distribution line, together with a11 necessary fixtures and appurtenances, "facilities", on, over,
under, along, and across the herein described property, in accordance wi#h all applicable laws
and regulations. Said easements being strips of land ten (10) feet wide.
2. ACCESS AND DAMAGE. Grantee shall have access over and across the above
described property and adj oining property of the Grantor for the purpose of the in.stallation,
repair and maintenance.
3. RIGHT OF WAY CLEARING A.ND MAINTENANCE. Crantee shall have the right
to cut, trim, and remove any and all brush, branches and trees, including da.nger trees, on the
Avista Corporation Document No. Page 1 of S
• 4740419
06~1912402 o 11556A
~
GIRROII EAS $23.00 Spokane Co, Wl
above described property of the Grantor, that in the opinion of the C'nantee, could interfere with
the safe and reliable operation of Grantee's facilities as described herein, or that could interfere
with the exercise of Graatee's rights as granted herein. _
4. GRANTOR' S USE OF THE PROPERTY AND OTHER GR.ANTS OF EASEMENTS.
Grantor reserves the right to use and enjoyment of the property described herein, but such use
shali not conflict or interfere with the Grantee's rights herei.n granted. Grantor shall not
construct, place or maintain any building or structures within said easement strip tha't would _
interfere with the maintenance or safe operation of said facilities or that are not in compliance
with all safety and building codes, regulations and laws. Grrantor reserves the right to grant
telephone and cable television andlor communication providers non-exclusive easements in the
described easements for the purpose of constructing, repairing and replacing underground
teievision and cable Iines and equipment, provided that such television and/or cabEe providers
shall be required to cooperate with the Grantee herein to maintain reasonable joint use of the
easements. Similarly, Grantee agrees to cooperate with such television and cable providers to
maintain reasonabte Joint use of the easements.
5. SUCCESS4RS AND ASSIGNS. The rights and obligations of the parties shall be for
the benefit of and be binding upon their respective successors, heirs and assigns.
WITNESS this ~O day of ~wv~e_ , 20 0`~
.
Graator's Signature Grantor's Signature ~
~7,5 T4
'k
Print C'rrantor's Name Print Grantor's Name
Grantor's Signature Grantor's Signature
Print Grantor's Name Print Grantor's Name
Cnantor's Signature Grantor's Signature
Print Grantor's Name Print Grantor's Name
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss.
County of Spokane }
Avista Corporation Document No. Page 2 of 5
.
4740419
0611912002 o 11556i1
CARAOII EAS $23.00 Spokane Co, YA
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that~ n~t u ~
, is the individual(s) who appeared before
me, and sa.id individuai(s) acknowledged to me that he/Ot signed this instrument, and beltg
acknowledged it as his/bar free and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this
instrument.
DATED this day of ~ZL~6-- , 2002.
. ~
•~~l~~Y N4TA.RY PUBLIC IN A,ND FOR WASHINGTON
~
Resid.ing at: ';&(AdGs A~¢
u • 1G - -
' ♦~,t ~ ~ My Appointment Expires; /axg~
j t
~ •
t .
Avista Corporation Document No. Page 3 of 5
. 4740419
; Pa~o: 4 of 5
~ 06,1912002 1 t :56A
pLt EAS $23,00 Spokane Co, 10
EXHIBIT "Ap SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION
Easement stripe each being Ten (10) feet wide and located on certain property
described as foilows:
PARCEL 1:
A 10.04 foot wide strip of land in that portion of the southeast quarter of Section 35,
Township 26 North, Range 44 Eas#, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington,
the southwesterty edge of which lies 14.00 feet northeasterty, as measured
perpendicular and radial, from the following described line:
Commencing at the most Easterly comer of Lot 5, Block 15 of Summerfield East Third
Addition as shown per Book 18 of Plats, page 31, said point being a 1/2" steel pin with
plastic cap marked "Moore 18091";
Thence North 39°05'40" East, on the northwesterty line of Lot 1, Block 15 and Lot 2,
Block 16, per said Sumrnerfield East Third Addition, a distance of 182.33 feet to the
Point of Beginning of said line;
Thence North 50°54'20" V1/est, a distance of 32.12 feet to the beginning of a 427.50 foot
radius curve, the center of which bears North 39°Q5'40" East;
Thence northwesterly on said cunre, through a central angle of 7°40'42", an arc distance of 57.29 feet;
Thence North 43°13'38" West, a distance of 265.19 feet to the beginning af a 522.50
foot radius curve, the center of which bears South 46°4fi'22" West;
Thence northwesterly on said curve, through a central angle of 2°5fi'32", an arc
distance of 26.83 feet to the terrninus of said line.
PARCEL TV1/0:
A 10.00 foot wide strip of land in that portion of the southeast quarter of Section 35,
Township 26 North, Range 44 Easf, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington,
the southerly edge of which lies 14.00 feet northwesterly, as measured perpendicular
and radiaf, from the following described line:
Commencing at the most Easteriy corner of Lot 5, Block 15 of Summerfield East Third
Addition as shown per Book 18 of Plats, page 31, said point being a 1/2" steel pin with
plastic cap marked uMoore 18091
Thence North 39°05'40" East, on the northwesterly line of Lot 1, glock 15 and Lot 2,
81ock 16, per said Summerfield East Third Addition, a distance of 182.33 feet;
Avista. Corporation Document No. Page 4 of 5
4740419
.
- 06~19f20Q1 ~1f~56A
CAR~L us $23, 00 Spokane Co, 4A
Thence North 50°54'2Q" West, a distance of 32.12 feet to the beginning of a 427.50 foot
radius curve, the center of which bears North 39°05'40" East;
Thence northwesterly on said curve, through a central angle of 7°40'42", an arc
distance of 57.29 feet;
_ Thence North 43°13'38" West, a distance of 265.19 feet to the beginning of a 522.50
foot radius curve, the center of which bears South 46°46'22" West;
Thence northwesteriy on said curve, through a central angle of 2°56'32", an arc
distance of 26.83 feet;
Thence North 43°49'50" East, a distance of 78.14 (zeet;
Thence North 36°06'23" West, a distance of 30.00 feet;
Thence North 23°59'36" West, a distance of 106.53 feet;
Thence North 36°34'05" West, a distance of 52.37 feet;
Thence North 63°'i8'27" West, a distance of 49.94 feet;
Thence North 72°37'40" West, a distance of 103.23 feet;
Thence South 89°55'00" West, a distance of 379.33 feet;
Thence South 70 ° 18'02" West, a distance of 67.45 feet;
Thence South 19°18'07" East, a distance of 122.51 feet to the beginning of a 372.50
foot curve, the center of which bears South 13°55'54" East, and the Point of Beginning
of said southerly line;
Thence westerly on said curve, through a centra[ angle of 7°26'38", an arc distance of
48.39 feet;
Thence South 68°37'28" West, a distance of 9.31 feet to the terminus of said southerly
line.
All located in the South Ha1f (S'/z) of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East, W. M.,
Spokane County, State of Washington.
Avista Corporation Document No. Page 5 of 5
r r~ d u ~ 4718034
~ ~ Il n Page: 1 of 4
COUNiI' ENGI1ffEA ~ ~ ~114(1d02 10:5~11
- S0•00 Mane Co. m1
• After Recordiuog Retdrn To: Spol~ane Coanty Engineer ,
Attn.: Right of Way.Department
Docvmemt Titlo: Border Baserncat
Cmntos(e): FIVB FIF'TY, L.L.C. A WASHINGTON LIMIT'ED LIABILZTY COMPANi(
Grautee: Govem=eak Couary of Spo]rxaa . ' .
I.ogalDcaCiiption PTN. SSI. SBC, 35. TWN. 26a, Rc. 44 P,ASS'. w.M.
Additioaal Legal Dcsaiptioa: See Page 1;& 2 . .
Asse.ssa]'s Tsx Pereel Number. PTN OF 46354 . 9050
lttf"tace Number:
Log Ia DaLa 4-19-02
Reqnc~ed by: GLORIA prcpued by: RM ,
' Putposc: P-1206 D BFN w 2583 RnadNaaeW. CRQWN RW
SYOKANE C~UN''Y DIVISION OF ENC7eERING ,
. Spokane County, Washin,gbDn
y s'oRDER FA.sFMrrT
~
IN THB MATTER OF cRawN, RoAn RF NO. 25e3
~
KNOW ALL NiEN BY TEM PRESEM, tbat the Grantor(s) PIVE FIFTIt, L. z. c. A .
i+7A5HZNGTON LIMITED LIABILI'F7l COMPANY . e
. :
For and in consideration of Mnhial bcneSrts, the receipt of wbicAh is hereby aclmowledged, grants
to the public and to Spokane Co~nty, a political snbdivision of the State of Washingtopi a
BORDER BASkMF.sIT to use the~ following descxibcd real ProPertY situated in the, County of
Spokane, and the State of Wasningtpn, to-wih AFFECTS ASSESSORS PARCBLNO(%).: 46354.9050
3
EASEMENT IEGAL OESCRlPT10N FaR 14.00 FOOT BORDER EASEMQN477 -
A 14 00 toot w6de strfp of tard In #het partlon of the sauCheast quart;er of Sedbon A Tovmsfip 26 Nortlh, Rartge 44 Eas; WiRameb .
Mericnan, Spolcane County, Wash(ngDan, the southerlr Itne of wbIch fs desaibed as fooows: '
Commendng at the most Easterty camer of Lot 5, Biodc 15 of Summer5eld East Thkd AdOon as shovm per 8dok 18 of Plats, page
31. sald paint being a 1/2' stad p!n with pfasffc cap marked'Nbore 1809Y;
Thence North 39°0540" East, on ihe norl~mwesterty fine of Lot 1. B1odc 15 and L4t 2, B?xk 16, per said Summerfteld E"
Tturd AddfHor►, a distance at j82.33 teet
Thenca North 50 °54'20' WesC a (ffstance M 3212 W bo the beglnning of a 427.50 toot radius curve, the center of wlikh
bears Nor1fi 39°054(Y EasC
Thance northwesteriy on saEd aurve, thrvugh a ceritral angSe of 7°042", arl arc distance at 57.29 feek _
Thence Narth 43°13'38' West a dstance ot 265.19 feet ta the beornng of a 52250 faot racAus curva, the centef of which
bears Sottifi 48°46'2Y West
i
Thence Rorthtivesterty on said curve, tfxx+augh a cenbat angle of 2°5612', an arc d►sfarue oi26.83 [eek
R E uee?,ix Exempt
Du . ;2 q Z
OQ Z. 5p Cuu . ~
- - 1 4718034
- u Pa~: 2 of 4
, 041Y1120QQ 10A1i
fAOY EIIGGIttEEA FAS $0.00 Saokane Co. FA
Therice North 430495(r East, adLstm dT8.14 feeX
Thenm Nath 3600923' West, a dfstaru of 30.OQ fieet
Thencs Nortb 23'5738' West a cbstanCe of 108.63 feet . Thence NorM 36•34'05' West, a dEstance oi 5237 feet '
Thence Nortt► 63°18'Z7' West a dlslarxe of 49.94 tget • • • '[henoe Naith T2'37'4W WesL a dstatxa o! 10323 feet - ~ -
'tltence South 89'55'00' VYest a dstarm d 379.33 feefi _
- mence South 70°1gar w~ a dstance of 67.45 Wt -
fience South 19°18.'OT East adstom d 122:51 test b fhe beginning of a 372.50 foat cvm ft centeroiwhich bears
South 13•SSSA' East and the Palrtt W Beginning of said soulhery We:
.
Tttesics wa*ry on said mnre, tluvv9h a central angle a17•28'38'. an arc etance of 48.39 feeX -
Thence South 68 °3T28' West, a&lanm oi 9.31 ted te Cha tsrninus ot said southetty qne. Ths Bozder Easemeat as ehown hetean is hereby granted to Spokauo Cow0.ty aad its authoriud
• ageats, and to the PubIic for Rasd purposes, including but aot limited to curbs, sidevvalka,
drainage, sigpage and other nsage deemed n:ecessatY by the Spokane Couaty Division of
Engiueering for the safecy amd welfaze of the Public. No fence or portion thereof witl be
. conBtructod withiu said Easement witiwut permission of the Spok$ae Couaiy Divisiaa of
g,agineering, nor will amy objects be placed in said Easemeaat thai would obstruct the sight
distancr, neceseary for safe snd affi+cient vehicula movemeut. Aay othcr Easments granted or
dedicated within this Border Easemeat azea will be subordinaie to the rigbts cxeated by tbis
Easement and are subject to Spokam County Division of Engineering permit process prior to
usage.
The Lasement and the agreements and duties pmvid0d for hemn shall nm with the Iand and shWll
be binding on, and shall imm to the beaefit of the parties referenced herein, their heus, _
successors and assigqs.
The Graator(s) or their successors in intmrest ag~+ee to and shall maintain in good repair the
sidevvallcs, driveways and landscaping to be installed in sucb propertY, and wheu so doiqg shall
not be considercd agcnts of Spokaae County.
Sgokane County shall maintain all drainage inlets, grates, PiPes. and drywells used fbr the
disposal of public Road drainaga.
, • ~
• ' -
• 4718034
. Pa • 3 of 4
04r241M 10:55A
C4UN1Y ENGIKEEEB EkS $0.04 Scokane Co. lA
IN Vi5~~"~iERFsO ,I bave ~reanto set ~ band(* end scal(x) tliis .
~d a~y of : , . 2002
. .
By: By: c ' .
-
KENi`lETkJ . TIIP R '
. sTATE oF w,4sUNGTox )
CoUNTY oF SPOxaNE ) ss Y cenify that I laiow or hsve satisfactoty eviden.ce fhat ICENrlMH J. TvprrBx
(is/ma) the individual(a) who agpeated bafam mq snd said individual(s) acknowiedged that
`(helstmd`~cRj sigaed this in.stnunena, and acl=wledged it to be ' ) frec and voluntery
-
act, for thc vscs and pucposas mcutioaed in the instnaancnt
Dabed this a y~ ~ day of Z~ c,r~/ , ifl 02
, ,
. 4
OfPtCiAL SP.AL '
ptwYrtono T. r}oort
noTwRY Fudirc NOT PUBLIC srATt or wwsnInaron - In and for the Stat,e of Washington,
rnr coMMtsslon axhRes
JurtE 21. zoos reSidiag at Spokene. . .
My appoinbment expires ti
• _ _ -
` 4718034
.
- ~ - 2- . 04124I2002 o10 56l1
CONY E1IGINEfA EAS 503 SDokane Co, 9
wxx
ToroRmy EASTLV-AL
~~~1w
.
#5~
2,
~
~VI ~ 1
. 1'~ 1 8 ~ '~c •,r ~p,
K WIOE 2
oaooc~ ' a
~
f c-• ~ :tr•.t' ` ' ~ ~':t
~-Op 8 7
UJ V 6 Y1/
~ ~ ; t ` ~•h ~ • ~
oz~= r,~~ ► ,r~rr~• \
`
L ~,,....i - 5
12 b 4 ~ lbo~
~ ~16
r - ~ 13 lp 2
I I F ta b 1 ~Rp~ p/4D
. .l.. T.1. t ~ • `y ~
I I ► ~ f' ~ P.0~8
i
r
- - _ ~ ~ ~ ~N~ ` - - - -
i ~ i -►--7--._ ~
i e
,°W°-1
14' BORDER EASEMENT
SCALE: 1 250'
WYATT ENGINEERIIZG, INC
1220 N. NOWARO ST.
SPOKANE.INA 99201
FAX (509) 328-0423
(509) 328-5139
1
4/i!/02
679300EA5.OWG
.
TMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPAR
ne
*Va
;oAValley CURRENT PLANNING
FINAL REVIEW CHECKLIST
~ _ . . .
PLAT ❑ SHORT PLAT O BINDING SITE PLAN
PROJECT INFORMATION
7/1/ 3
Project Number: 1*045" 12-06 - 7._P Date Submitted:
Project Parcel Number:,V43s7?. 907<< ~ y~3sy.g° z~
SUBMITTAL RFQUIREMENTS
❑ Nine (9) copies of the proposed final with dedication.
❑ Three (3) copies of the final plat certificate (not older than 6 months of recording plat).
Property outlines in red on a current Spokane County Assessor's Map(s) by surveyor to
assure location within the accuracy of the City map.
❑ A Water Plan signed by the applicant, water purveyor, Fire District, Spokane Regional Health
District, and State Department of Health or a letter from the water district and fire district stating
that the existing water system is adequate.
❑ Letters of easement acceptance from utility purveyors:
A) Phone D) Electricity
B) Water E) Sewer
C) Gas F} Other
❑ Final Short Plat, Plat, or BSP review fee:
$ Receipt No. Date accepted
❑ Final Site Development Plan (PUD) review fee:
$ Receipt No. Date accepted
❑ Detailed landscape plan with plant list, cost estimates, letter of assurance to
instatl landscaping per plan and estimate, PUD's especially.
AGENCY COMMENTS
❑ City Engineer Date received:
❑ Utilities Division Date received:
❑ Spokane Regional Health District Date received:
❑ Fire District No. Date received:
❑ Date received :
❑ Date received :
~ Date received:
Page 1 of 3
~
~
i -
REVIEW COMMENTS
The fo/%wing review comments were provided to: Date By
S u rveyo r/Ea.gupeer S~-A- n41-Xz„ ~ 7//s /e-~
J Applicant
❑ Need City Engineer's approval
❑ Need Utilities' approval
❑ Need Spokane Regional Health District approval
❑ Need recording fee of check payable to:
Spokane County Audifor
❑ Need to pay property taxes (Contact County Treasurer's Office)
❑ ~1..~.~,~ ~,~,t,..✓ ZY 2t.-..._. /1
❑
ttt^ 2.~.•d-.~/ L...d ~ .!?,.~„de,1
❑ ~ _ a.l~ ,iL+~,,..., ~~~P ~i~z~
❑ h fi n.~~.e,.-Q t - ~ ~ 0 eA
❑
' d ❑
❑ UAA-rl f CA,? ~•l-n~e .c~z~.-~
❑ j4,-1zL1V M.-o
.
a
❑
Page 3 of 3
. WYATr ENGINEEMNG, INC... ~
A SUBSIDIARY OF USKH, INC, ~
T 0n ~cdC~am } + D A T F ~ 1
M''u.t"L lUr P J E C T N A M E I~1 1~1 ^ ~
~
C vcr- In 2
I l-JO ~'j ~ CJ~ P 0 T NUMBER
~
~
GENTLEMEN :
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLIAWING ITEMS:
❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ PRINTS ❑ PLANS ❑ SAMPLES ❑ SPECIFICATIONS
❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑
COPIES DATE OR N0. DESCRIPTION ~1 *2 *3
1::71nai Plat- c'u.mrlf) d
~
aatn4 A8 A
RECEIVED
- c~c~ ~ .~3~5/~3
*1- NO EXCEPTIONS NOTED P14, JUL 0 9 2003
*2- REVISE & RESUBMIT
*3-REJECTED SPOKANE VAtLEY
OEPARTMENT OF
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED - COMMUM(TY DEVELOPMENT
❑ FOR YOUR USE Q RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION
❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS
><FOR REVIEW 8► COMMENT ❑ ❑
/ ❑ FOR BIDS DUF 20 ❑
REMARKS:
~
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINOLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
COPIES TO S I VD: + 1220 NORTH HOWARD SPOKANE, WA 99201 PH. (509) 328-5139 FAX (509) 328-0423 ,
( ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS )
PrlntCreft
SPOKAN&; COUNTY DiviSION OF ~ LANNING
FINAL PLAT/SHORT PLAT/BSP/PUD REVIEW
Date Submitted: ProjecUFile Na.: ~P ze-~ 1;2 d~ ~ 77-
Parcel No(s): Gl6 33 "o-V Plat Expiration Date: ~211
. .
1 ~7y -
Date Initial Applicant Submittal Requirements
1. Nine (9) paper copies of proposed final with dedication ~
2. Four (4) copies of final plat certificate (current w/in 6 mo.) ~ o
3. Current Assessors map showing property outlined in red, I l~-~ 3
identify final phases
4. Letters of easement acceptance from:
Phone Purveyor
Power Purvevor
Cable Purveyor .
Gas Purveyor
Sewer Purveyor
~ Water Purvevor
5. Fees: Final PIaUShort Plat/BSP $
Final PUD Plan
Engineers review: 100.00
TOTAL FEES $
AGENCY REVIEW
Circulation letter sent: 3 14 day comment period ends: k9,7ae,?:h l l~2&ld 3
Responses
~ Regional Health F-LF-ire District -2,
Engineering Sewer District
Utilities ~ Water District
Other: ~ Other:
Notes:
Review comments were mailed/faxed to:
~
Engineer/Surveyor: .date: J ~
Applicant: date:
~
-
PR0JL..,&T/F1LE No.
MAP & DEDICATION REVIEW Date Initial
1. Section -2,.-::~- Township 26 Range yf /
2. Washington registered surveyor signature, date and stamp ~-7
3. Sheet size: 24" X 36" for plat/PUD/BSP 69>
18" X 24" for sbatt plat ~~-7 Qe-P
4. North arrow and scale "=50' =100', 1"=200')
5. Bo1d line of plaUshort pIaUPUD/BSP
6. Dashed line for access easements ~
7. Location and width of proposed streets, rights-of-way,
easements, open space; indicate 1' strips
8. StreeUroad names 2P-7
9. Addresses drafted on mylar
10. Check lot sizes with conditions of approval and Zoning Code
11. Appropriate setback/buffers per conditions of approval
12. Appropriate frontage, including cul-de-sacs
13. Check PUD setbacks/fencing requirements ~
~
14. Design, lot and block numbers, dimensions and area of lots ry ~'7
15. Check dedication for conditions of preliminary plat approval
16. Number and type of units with specific conditions of appro.v~a~ a 1~.
17. Check Plat Certificate for easements, clouds on property, io-1s
owners arties of interest, etc.. ~ 07
18. egal description proofed (tile report to dedication)
19. Agency signature blocks
20. Detailed landscape plan (PUD) with plant list and cost U
estimates
21. Compliance with Shorelines ~
22. Compliance with Critical Areas Ordinances
23. Title Notice for "Future Acquisition Area" or other
24. BoCC Resolution typed and proofed (PIat/PUD)
25. Taxes paid? ~
26. Auditor recording fee ,~V ~
~
ADDITIONAL ITE S TO CO PLE ,TE:
~ l -7 ~ CP~c. 4-
~I G~ ~G Gi - vl P O~ ~ !~o / ~ L~
~/l.c~ ;~.r~ ~~,C~~s~~,z,~ ~ ~ ~~A
;
r i
w
~ PROJL.T/FILE No.
NOTES
~
-t
~ f
, S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMIIVT
DNISION OF PLANNIIVG
~
i~DATE: February 28, 2003
TO: Ken Tupper Wyatt Engineering
122 N. Raymond 1220 N. Howard
Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99201
FROM: V pJohn Pederson, Planning Supervisor
RE: J Status of Pending Land Use Aetion
File # PE-1206-78, Summerfield East, 6`" Addition, Final Plat
In recognition of formal incorporation of the City of Spokane Valley and to continue
processing of pending land use actions, please be advised that the Spokane County
Division of Planning will transfer the above-referenced project file to the City of Spokane
Valley on April l, 2003.
Prior to April 1, 2003, the Division of Planning will make every effort to complete your
project or reach a reasonable milestone under Spokane County Public Works Application -
Review Procedures For Project Pernuts. If the pending project is not complete, the
project file will be transferred to the City of Spokane Valley for further processing.
If you have any questions about your project status or need additional information, please
contact me at your convenience.
c: Board of County Commissioners
Gerry Gemmill, Assistant to Chief Executive Officer
James Harris, Interim Planning Director, City of Spokane Valley
:
MA1L STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AvEMJE •SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 9 FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133
-
,
,
S P O K A N E G O U N T Y
A DIVISION OF THiE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DNISION OF PLANNING
DATE: February 25, 2003
TO: Jeff Forry, Building & Code Enforcement
~
FROM: ' John Pederson, Planning Supervisor
SUBJE Proposed Final Plat of Summerfield East 6" Addition, PE-1206-78
Parcel No. 46354.9050
Please mark the attached map with the specific address on each lot in red ink and return it
to me by March 11, 2003.
Thank you
Attachment: Fina1 plat
:
MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 9 FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133
,
'r
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
. A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DNISION OF PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Treasurer's Office, Ann Leach
FROM: Marti Buck
For John Pederson, Planning Supervisor
DATE: February 25, 2003
SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat of Summerfield East 6`'' Addition, PE-1206-78
Parcel No. 46354.9050
Attached is a copy of the Plat Certificate for the above-subject proposed final plat. Please
review it to ensure that it is sufficient for your purposes. If it is not, please let me know.
Also, advise if the taxes have been paid, and if not, the amount due so that the applicant
may be advised. Submit any comments or concerns regarding this certificate by March
11, 2003.
Please ca11477-7212 if you need further information.
Thank you.
Attachment: Plat Certificate
MA1L STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE (509) 477-7200 • FAX' (549) 477-2243 9 TDD. (509) 477-7133
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DNISION OF PLANNING
MFM0RANDUM
TO: Division of Engineering and Roads, Transportation Engineering, Scott
Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball
Division of Engineering and Roads, Developmenfi Services, John Hohman
Division of Utilities, Znformation Services, Jim Red
Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
Spokane County Auditor, Recording - Tom Perkins
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Trentwood Irrigation Districi .
Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement - Jeff Forry
FROM: John Pederson, Planning Supervisor
DATE: February 25, 2003
SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat of Summerfield East 6`" Addition, PE-1206-78
Parcel No. 46354.9050
Attached are copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any
comments to me by March 11, 2003 If you have any questions you may contact ine at
477-7200.
Attachment: Final Plat
cc: Ken Tupper, 122 N Raymond, Spokane, WA 99206
Wyatt Engineering, Inc., 1220 N Howard, Spokane, WA 99201
MAIL S'POP PWK-1 • 1116 W BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX (509) 477-2243 • TDD (549) 477-7133
_
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
411.
A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DF.I'ARTMENT
DIVISION OF PLANNING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Assessor's Office; Andrea Sandvik
Dave Berto, Engineers, c/o Sandy Kimball
FROM: Marti Buck
For John Pederson, Planning Supervisor
DATE: February 25, 2003
SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat of Summerfield East 6`h Addition, PE-1206-78
Parcel No. 46354.9050
Attached is a copy of the Plat Certificate for the above-referenced proposed final plat.
Please review and forward any comments you may have by March 11, 2003. If you have
any auestions you may ca11477-7212.
Thank you.
Attachment: Plat Certificate
MA1L STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE• (509) 477-7200 • FAX. (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133
. .
Project Number 03001019 1 Application Date 2/21/03 Page 1 ot 1
r' 14
THIS IS NOT A PERIVIIT
Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit
Proiect Ittforination:
Permut Use PF,-1206-78 - FINAL 22 LOTS Contact TUPPER, KEN
Address 122 N RAYAZOND
C- S- Z SPOKANE WA 99206
Setbacks Front Left Right Rear. Phone (509) 217-1052
Group Name
Site Iiiformation: Project Name S[7MMERFIELD
Plat Key 000000 Name UNKN4WN District H
Parcel Number 46354.9050 Block Lot
SrteAddress 0 N AI)DRESS UNKNOWN LT~T Owner Name. F1NjE FiFTY, LLC RECENED
SPOKANE, WA USA 00000 Address 322 N UNIVERSITY SPOKANE COUNTY
Locatton• SPO SPOKANE, WA 99206
FEB 2 J 2003
loning UNKN [lnknown
Water District Hold ;j DIvIS}ON O, PLAN1q1~('1
Area 38.4$ Elcres Width 0 Depth 0 Right Of Way (ft) 0
Nbr of Bldgs 0 Nbr of Dwelliugs. 0
Review Informatioit:
Perm its:
I vnbf Plrrt -
lA u-m
Phone
Item Descriqtion Units Umt Desc Fee Amount
ENGINFER FINAL UTAP & PLAN 1 SEt,EC`C $100 00
FINAL 22 # nF LOTS $1,082 00
Permit Total Fees: $1,182 00
Notes:
Puyijient Sufnirtarv:
Permit Tvpe Fee Amount [nvoice Amount Amount Paid Amotult Oxvme
Long Plat `51,182.00 $1,152 00 $1,182 00 $000
$1,182 00 $1,182 00 $1,182 00 $0 00
Disclairner:
Submittal of this application ccrtifies the owner (or person(s) authorized by the nwncr) has both eaamined and tinds the intormatian
contained within to be true and correct, and agrees that all provisions ot laws and/or regulations governinK this type of work will be
complied with. Subsequent issuance of a permit shall not be construed to be a pernut for, or an approval ot, any vialation of any of
the provisions af the code or of uny other state or local laws or ordinances.
Signature:
Opeiatoi MB Printed T3y GMW Print Uate 2/21/03
, ZUNING AND LANL7 USE FEFS
' 0- RECEIPT INFORMATION
Date:~'~ ~ ~~ile NumUer•P~-~ '.~~~.0 Parcel Na.:
Naine• Phane Numbei.
k
FT-
Company Name (if applicable}: -T
tlddress: B'V- ~ City/5tate/Zip: <
Z 17
FEE IN FORMATIUN
[lem Item (multiplied by (equals)
# Description Amount # of Ctems) Total
~
' TQTAL AMOUNT DUE ~ $ 4
~ - 'l,ransactian Tp0 -
~ -
By: ReceiPt ~,J
Y
l -
Spokane County
Public Works DepaYtment
Division of Building & Cocle EnforcementoKUNE ourvN
Receipt FEB 21 2003
DIViSION nF PLANNING
Receipt 1Vumber: 1001 Cr.rstomer 1Vumber
Proiects
~ Full
Proiect Nbr Inv Nbr Fee Amt Inv Am1 Owing PAID Pmt
. 03001019 1 $1,182 00 $1,182 00 $1,182 00 $1,182 00 ~03001020 1 $1,152 00 $1,152.00 $1,152. 00 $1,152 00 W
Total: $2, 334 00 ~$2, 334 00 ' $2, 334 00 $2, 334 00
Miscellaneous Items
Tota! PAID: $2, 334 00 ^
Tender
~e Check Acct Balance CC Nbr Exn Date TENDERED
VISA xxxxxxxxxxxx2355 01/2006 2,33400
Payer
Total TENDERED: 2, 334 00
Over / (Sliort) $0 00
Clrange $0 00
Notes:
Trnir Date / Time: 2/21 /03 9 51 56 AM
, By: GWendel
Logon User: gwendel
Slarioir: GWENDEL
Overritle By:
~
Prirtlecl: 2121103 9. 51. 59 AM page 1 o f I
4 WYATT ENGINi. ING., INC.,
A SUBSIDIARY OF USKH, INC. ,
T o CoUfT~ 71011n~ ~ 3 .
wqtr C ~S'O n
DATE PROJECT NAME
PROJECT NUMBER LO'~ 9
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ PRINTS ❑ PLANS ❑ SAMPLES ❑ SPECIFICATIONS
❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑
COPIES OATE OR N0. DESCRIPTION *1 *2 *3
Q 1 ~ ~ ('a ° ~~►~~.1 ~1~ A~
A~b
.
-3 s c~. ~"r~~,Yl~~:-~
~ i.
D
SPOKANE C
t)►Vlslo►~ F Li-.~ 4 rvTrTG-
*1- NO EXCEPTIONS NOTEO
*2- REVISE a RESUBMIT
*3-REJECTEO
THESE ARE TRANSMIT7ED AS CHECKED:
❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR OISTRIBUTION
❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS
M FOR REVIEW a COMMENT ❑ ❑
❑ FOR BIDS OUE 20 ❑
REMARKS:
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
COPIES TO SIGNED~~lk
~
~ 1220 NORTH HOWARD SPOKANE, WA 99201 PH. (509) 328-5139 FAX (509) 328-0423 ,
( ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS )
Printcreft
21~ 1 i1005 ~ 30 19 PM, ~~~°fde2~RiCL?tt
e, summerE10d 5th Add PSE~.SurveY\6`"g ~
1\674302"1uPA
a
sQ
$ y
~a
a
ti~ Q
i
111w, ~a4gq ~$Qq q aRaqa"
~A Sk qt'` ag
Q
q ,
tq q
la
~ ~ !1 e~ ~`R
g~~~
~ ~ poQ ~►~y at~ ~ ~ ~i~~~~~ ~v ~ 5
g • bbif ~ ~~t a Kj
~
~s CAt~~4y ~ ~ -
~$6.
~a i
i~C ~ I
~V
~ ~~e
i ~
~ ~ R~ A ~ Abo~~~ ~7~►y ~V ~ ~ Y~ ~ 14 1 ;~e~S~
~ ~a~ ~ ~
~~..~~2R ~ ~ ~y,q
" ~ ~ ~ 8~- ~ ►
~l~~ I ~ ivlf~
t
l~ A ~ •~i~ ~ ~ ~ o~s~ ~ ~ s R ~g p~
A~
~
,
~is~~
,
► ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~
q
a~
q
A ~ ~i
yi
~g
4
R
$
ri
~
RA4
It ' ~
~s
:v
~r * > ~ ~g~
qAv
~ t
A~ C ~j ~ ~ x ~ .a 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ► lk
~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ► ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
~4at~ti'~
r
~
' y~.~ ~
~
,
1
ACTIVITY LOG
FILE NU. ~0~
PLAMNER
nATE ~ cvNTAcT sTAFr i Con~~ENTs
IN ITIALS
-117- ~/l'~ )/?I
~ •
r
~
R-- ~
~
~
~
~
,
~
~
. ,
. ~
CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY
Community Development Deparlment
11707 E. Sprague, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
FINAL REVIEW (509) 921-1000
0 Title Notice for "Future Acquisition Area" or other
a"'Auditor recording fee ~o
0 Other:
REVIEW COMMENTS
The following review comments were provided to: Date and Initial
❑ Surveyor/Engineer
O Applicant
0 Need Spokane County Engineer's approval
- ❑ Need Spokane County Utilities' approval
• Need Spokane Regional Health District approval
❑ Need recording fee, payable to Spokane County Auditor
~ 0 Need to ensure property taxes are paid
❑ ' ~ ~~A
, o
❑ ~ w.- C'~1_ \ l t Y~ ~D ~~f•~ ~W-e~ ~ r'F~ ~
❑ s ti.~- ~~C~
❑
. ❑
❑
❑ ,
❑
❑
. ❑
❑ .
O
Final Review Form kjs 8-11-97
Page 3 of 4
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
1NTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: January 22, 2004
TO: Heather Kauer, Planning Technician, City of Spokane Valley Community
Developinent Department
FROM: Donald Copley, EHS II - EHD, SRHD
SUBJECT: Review and Comments on PE-1206-78 (Summerfield East 5th and 6~' Additions)
All Spokane Regional Health District Conditions of Approval have been satisfied by the sponsor
of this plat.
Memo/PE-1206-78 Surrune~eld East 5`h Adci/lh
3POKane COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Val.ley CURRENT PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
1/4/os,
Date: January 2, 2004
To: City of Spokane Valley Engineering Department
City of Spokane Valley Police Department
Spsk*&1w&xW@ffly'~*'~u Jfi'#'i"M
Spokane County Division of Utilities - Information Services; Jim Red
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Spokane Regional Health District - Steve Holderby
Trentwood Irrigation District #3
East Valley School District No. 356
~ ~ C'6~~
From. Heather Kauer, Planning Technician 0 l~.
11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
PH: 509.688-0046
FX: 509.688-0037
E-MAIL: hkauer@spokanevalley.org
SUBJECT: Review and Comment on PE-1206-78
The City of Spokane Valley is the lead agency for the review of the above referenced
project. The City requests your review and comment on the submitted short plat.
Please review the attached plat and submit written comments via mail, facsimile
or email by January 16, 2004 to the attention of the staff person identified above.
Attachments: Subdivision
11707 E. Sprague • Suite 106 • Spokane Valley, WA • 99206 •(509) 921-1000 • Fax (509) 921-1008
.
To: Heather Kauer {City of Spokane Valley}
CC.
Frorn: Jim Red (Division of lJtilities)
Date: Tuesday, January 20, 2004
Subject: PE-1 206-78 S#age: Final Review Pha~e-, 5th add S 1laaley
SUMMERFIELD EAST
FA01 The aavisian of Utilities has no objection to the finalization of the above merationed praject.
Page 1 of 1
Heather Kauer
From: John Hohman
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:44 PM
To: Heather Kauer
Subject: PE-1206D-78 Final Plat of Summerfield
Heather,
We have reviewed the final plat documents for this project and find them to be acceptable. I will sign the mylar
when it is turned in.
Thanks,
John Hohman
1 /20/2004
uJiuD/us trtli 17:uU raX 50e 892 4125 SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPT 4-+-+ PLANNING 16002
V f
SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTMIENT
• Spokone County Flre Distrlct 1
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. I SPOKANE, WA 99206-3676 •(609) 928-1700 FAX (509) 892•4125
Mork 6rover
Chlet
March 5, 2003
John Pederson
Department of Building & Planning
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Final P1at
Summerfield East 5"' Addition
PE-12os-7e
Dear Mr. Pederson:
Ths Spokane Vailey Fire Department will require the installation of a nevv fire hydrant at
the lot line of lots 5&6 of B(ock 22. Access and road names listed are adequate.
' S incerely,
?
Kevin Miller
Deputy Fire Marshal
~~~NE rb
KM/dC DEC 2 2 '2UIv3
sPOKANE W~tV
DEPARTMEW ff
C4MMUNITY DEV@WPMEF~~`
• ~
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: March 13, 2003
TO: John Pederson, Associate Planner, Spokane County Planning Division
FROM: Donald Copley, EHS IZ - EHD, SRHID
SUBJECT: Proposed Fina1 Plat PE-12-06-78 (Summerfield East)
5" Addition 46354.9022
Spokane Regional Health District conditions #8 and 9 have not been satisfied by the sponsor of
this plat.
c: Ken Tupper
122 N. Raymond
Spokane, WA 99206
Wyatt Engineering, Inc.
1220 N. Howard Spokane, WA 99201
RFCEilvEit)
Memo1PE-12-06-78 Summefietd Sth/lh
DFC ? 2 $A'~
SPOKANE VALLoy
COM UNIIY pEVft~~ 4F~j.-
. ,
1 !
♦ Avista UtiliUes
1411 East Mission PO Box 3727
Spokane, Washington 99220-3727 Utll/tl eS
Telephone 509-489-0500
Toll Free 800-727-9170
facsimde 509-495-8734
February 28, 2003
Ms Lisa Lozano Frey, E.I.T.
Wyatt Engineering Inc.
1220 North Howard
Spokane, WA 99201
RE: Job No. 679302
Draft Final Plat of Summerfield East 5 `h Addition
Dear Ms Frey:
In reference to the above-mentioned plat, elsements are satisfactory Pleaseinclude a
statement about Border easements in the dedication language as shown below
Utility easements shown on the hecein described plat aie hei-eby dedicated to utility
companies which hold a franch►se granted by Spokane County or other governmencal
entity and are limated to those uses consistent with the construc[ion, reconsti-uction,
protection, maintenance and operation of said utilities, including gas, electricity,
telephone, cable, together with the izght to inspect said utilities and to trim ancUor remove
brush and trees which may interfere with the conscruction, maintenance and operation of
the same And togetller with the right to access said utility easements through any
Border easement sliown herein. Street light poles, ti•ees and bi•ick, rock or masonry
structures a►-e prohibited withln the aforementioned utility strip, unless installed by a
serving utility "
Becnuse some Plats have been modifietl after review and acceptance by Avista with
resard to utaliry easements, we request that thas office be notifzed if any substantial
changes, such as the addition of Border Easements, are mnde to the Plat prior to
recordcng It is not our intention to cause unnecessary delays or inconvenience
!-lowever, it is imperative that the serving utility companies are provided adequate space
to install facclities. RECEIVED
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (509) 495-8536 DEC Z 2 2003
Sincerely, SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY pEVELpPMENT
RECEIVED
~ SPOK~4NE CO~t~~
Priscilla Sprague
Real Estate Assistant MAR '3 2003
cc' ~Zi 66~~n-1-~''
Claucle Kaler, Avista DIVISION OF PLANNING
An affdiate of Avista Corp
~ Page 1 of 1
. ,
Heather Kauer
From: Copley, Don [DCopley@spokanecounty.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12 05 PM
To: Heather Kauer
Subject: RE Spokane Valley final plats
Hi Heather,
After a review of the files, PE-1852-97 Strawther"s Addition all Health District conditions of approval
have been satified, there are still conditions of approval that have not been satified fox the remanning
four plats. We are waiting for Approved Water plans. " Note Our records show PE-1206-78
Summerfield Sth and 6th Addition as PE-1206-78 Summerfield East Sth and 6th Addition. If you
have any additional questlons please don't hesitate to call me at 324-1584.
-----Original Message-----
From: Heather Kauer [mailto:hkauer@spokanevalley.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2003 10:51 AM
To: jred@spokanecounty.org; dcopley@spokanecounty.org; millerk@spokanevalleyfire.com
Subject: Spokane Valley final plats
Hello there - as you may know, John Todd has left the City. I have taken over final plats:
PE-1917-03/ZE-3-03 Asher Place
PE- 1867-99/PUDE-3 -99 Pine Rock Ridge
PE-1852-97 Strawther's Addition and
PE-1206-78 Summerfield 5th and 6th Additions
Would you let me know what conditions, if any, are still deficient on these properties from your
offices?
Thanks,
Heather Kauer
Planning Technician
City of Spokane Valley
11707 E. Sprague, Suite106
Spokane Valley, WA 99206
Phone (509) 688-0046
FAX: (509) 688-0037
hkauer@svokanevallev.org
1 U Fxl
8/27/2003
SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
DATE: March 13, 2003
TO: John Pederson, Associate Planner, Spokane County Planning Division
FROM: Donald Copley, EHS II - EHD, SRHD
SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat PE-12-06-78 (Su.m.merfield East)
5" Addition 463 54.9022
Spokane Regional Health District conditions #8 and 9 have not been satisfied by the sponsor of
this plat.
c: Ken Tupper
122 N. Raymond
Spokane, WA 99206
Wyatt Engineering, Inc.
1220 N. Howard
Spokane, WA 99201
Memo/PE-12-06-78 Summerfield Sth11h
03I05/03 1VED 17 : 06 FAX 509 892 4125 SPOKaNE VALLEY FIRE DEPT -*-4-) PLANNTING 0002
. M
. ~
IAI ~ SPOKANE VALLEY FIRE DEPARTIVIENT
• Spokone Counfiy Flte DistrlCt 1
10319 EAST SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WA 99206-3676 •(b09) 928-1700 FAX (509) 892-41 Z5
Mork 6rorer
Chlet
March 5, 2003
John Pederson
Department of Building & Planning
1026 W. Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
RE: Final Plat
Summerfieid East 5hAddition
PE-1206-78
Dear Mr. Pederson:
The Spokane Vailey Fire Department will require the installation af a new fire hydrant at
the lot line of lots 5&6 of Block 22. Access and road names listed are adequate.
Sincerely, I
,
Kevin Miller
Deputy Fire Marshal ~
IUU1/dc
Pederson, John
From: Peterschmidt, Lucy
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 4 37 PM
To: Pederson, John •
Subject: PE-1206-78
Hi John,
The Stormwater Utility has reviewed this application and we have no additional comments on the current proposal
Thanks,
Lucy
Lucy Peterschmidt, P.E
Stormwater Utility Engineer 477-7679
1
r
Avista Utilities
1411 East Mission PO Box 3727
Spokane, Washington 99220-3727 Utl ll tl @S
Telephone 509489-0500
Toll Free 800-727-9170
Facsimde 509-493-8734
February 28, 2003
1VIs Lisa Lozano Frey, E I.T
Wyatt Engineering Inc.
1220 Noi-th Howard
Spokane, WA 99201
RE: Job No. 679302
,
llraft Final Plat of Summerfield East Do, Addition
Dear Ms Frey:
In reference to the above-mentioned plat, easements are satisfactory Please include a
state na om.~ •ci~r~~~ in c~ Ii ~Ui iP ~i ~ i~~ 1 wi~ W
Utilily easements shown on [he herein clesci ibecl plat aie hereby dedicated to utiltty
companies which hold a fr-anchise granted by Spokane Counry or other governmental
entity and are limited to those uses consistent with the construction, reconstruction,
protection, maintenance and operation of said utilities, mcluding gas, electricity,
telephone, cable, together with the right to inspect said utilities and to tr►m and/or remove
brush anci trees which may interfere with the constcuctton, maintenance and operation of
lhe same Ancl together with thE right to access said utility easements throubh any I
Borcier easement shown herein. Street light poles, trees and brick, rock or masonry
structures are prohibited within the aforementioned utlllty strip, unless ,nstalled by a
serving utility "
Because some Plats have been modifced nfter review atad acceptance by Avista wcth regard to utiltty easemertts, we reqicest that thes office be notafied cf any substantcal
chartges, such as the addition of Border Easements, are macle to the Plat prior to
recorcling It is not occr antention to cause unnecessury delays or inconvenience.
However, et is cmperative tizczt the serving actility cornptcnies are provided aclequnte space
to cnstall facilitces.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (509) 495-8536
Sincerely,
~
RECEIVED
SPOKANE COUNTX
Priscilla Sprague
Real Estate Assistanc MAR 3 2003
cc ..a1,~►r►~.:~~I~~ Pl~,tl~►liti[Di~I~rQli~tilitlnl~~'~tl~"~.~.~~
C11ude K~~ler, Avista DtVlSION OF PLANNING
An affihate of Awsta Corp
~ . _
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
NORTH 7 2 O ARGONi3E
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212
Prepared for:
Order No.: SH-257938
KJT LLC. Charge: $175.00
ATTN: KEN TUPPER Tax: $14.18
122 N. R.AYMOND
cc: USKH, Inc./Marks
S E C O N D
P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E
Certificate for filing Plat of :
SUMMERFIELD EAST STH ADDITION
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's
and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States
District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for
the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing
any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this
certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit:
See Legal Description
RECEIVED
DEC 2 2 2003
SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Page 1 of 4
1 ,
Order No. SH-257938
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 26 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 1
SUNINSERFIELD EAST ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 9,
SAID POINT BEING A 5/8" STEEL PIN FROM WHICH A 5/8" STEEL
PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PLAT NO. 4 OF WEST FARMS
IRRIGATED TR.ACTS ACCORDING TO BOOK 101 OF PLATS, PAGE 51,
sEAxs NORTH o° 06102" WEST, A DtSTANCE OF 2610.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1121.63 FEET TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3 OF SAID PLAT AND
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST THE FOLLOWING FOUR
COURSES:
NORTH 62 ° 21'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 192.94 FEET;
NORTH 40 ° 31'S9" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 48.01 FEET;
NORTH 65 ° 56'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 128.00 FEET;
SOUTH 46 ° 13'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 114.31 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 32;
THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES:
NORTH 90 ° 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 469.10 FEET;
NORTH 790 35'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 21 SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 28 OF PLATS, PAGES 21-22;
THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING THREE
COURSES:
NORTH 00 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.36 FEET;
legal cont.
Page 2 of 4
Order No. SH-257938
legal cont.
NORTH 15 ° 25'37" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 39.42 FEET;
NORTH 00 05'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 125.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00100" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 159.82 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 ° 11'32" WEST, A QISTANCE OF 98.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87055106" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.37 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82°48102" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72°52100" WEST, A DiSTANCE OF 112.56 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.14 FEET, FROM
WHICH THE N4RTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST FARMS IRRIGATED
TRACTS BEARS NORTH 0006'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.42 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0006'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 405.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN:
KJT INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Washington Limited Liability Company
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos.
46354.9122 and 46353.9074.
Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said
parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no
assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Trentwood Irrigation District No. 3.
Page 3 of 4
~
Order No. SH-257938
3. Reservations contained in deed, recorded on October 20, 1886 under Recording No. 946, as
follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be
ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be
necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal
and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same.
4. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer construction, referred
to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer
services. Please contact the Division of Utilities Billing Section for information (509) 477-3604.
DATED AS OF December 3, 2003 at 8:00 a.m.
TRANSNATIO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
BY A
For service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Sean Heath, Title Officer
ENCLOSURES:
Paragraph 2
Sketch
sc
Page 4 of 4
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
NORTH 7 2 O ARGONNE
SPOKANE, WASHTNGTON 99212
Prepared f or :
Order No.: SH-257938
KJT LLC. Charge: $175.00
ATTN: KEN TUPPER Tax: $14.18
122 N. R.AYMOND
cc: USKH, Inc./Marks
S E C O N D
P L A T C E R T I F I C A T E
Certificate for filing Plat of :
SUMMERFIELD EAST 5TH ADDITION
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's
and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States
District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for
the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing
any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this
certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit:
See Legal Description
RECEIVED
DEC 2 2 2003
SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Page 1 of 4
Order No. SH-257938
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 26 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 1
SLTMMERFIELD EAST ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 9,
SAID POINT BEING A 5/8" STEEL PIN FROM WHICH A 5/8" STEEL
PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PLAT NO. 4 OF WEST FARMS
IRRIGATED TRACTS ACCORDING TO BOOK `O' OF PLATS, PAGE 51,
BEARS NORTH 0° 06102" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2610.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1121.63 FEET TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3 OF SAID PLAT AND
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST THE FOLLOWING FOUR
COURSES:
NORTH 62 ° 21'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 192.94 FEET;
NORTH 40 ° 31'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 48.01 FEET;
NORTH 65 ° 56'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 128.00 FEET;
SOUTH 46 ° 13'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 114.31 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 32;
THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES:
NORTH 90 ° 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 469.10 FEET;
NORTH 79 ° 35'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 21 SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 28 OF PLATS, PAGES 21-22;
THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING THREE
COURSES:
NORTH 00 00300" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.36 FEET;
legal cont.
Page 2 of 4
Order No. SH-257938
legal cont.
NORTH 15°25'37°' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 39.42 FEET;
NORTH 0005'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 125.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 159.82 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 ° 11'32" WEST, A QISTANCE OF 98.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTN 87055'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.37 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82°48102" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72 ° 52'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.56 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0° 00'00" EAST, A DiSTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.14 FEET, FROM
WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST FARMS IRRIGATED
TRACTS BEARS NORTH 0°06102" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.42 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0° 06'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 405.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN:
KJT INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Washington Limited Liability Company
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos.
46354.9122 and 46353.9074.
Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said
parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no
assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Trenfinrood Irrigation District No. 3.
Page 3 of 4
I
~
Order No. SH-257938
3. Reservations contained in deed, recorded on October 20, 1886 under Recording No. 946, as
follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be
ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be
necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal
and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same.
4. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer construction, referred
to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer
services. Please contact the Division of Utilifies Billing Section for information (509) 477-3604.
DATED AS OF December 3, 2003 at 8:00 a.m.
TRANSNATIO TITLE tNSURANCE COMPANY
BY
For service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Sean Heath, Title Officer
ENCLOSURES:
Paragraph 2
Sketch
sc
Page 4 of 4
~
,
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ~
NORTH 7 2 O ARGONNE
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99212
Prepared f or :
Order No.: SH-257938
KJT LLC. Charge: $175.00
ATTN: KEN TUPPER Tax: $14.18
122 N. R.AYMOND
cc: USKH, Inc./Marks
S E C O N D
P L A T C E R T I F I C A T$
Certificate for filing Plat of :
SUMMERFIELD EAST 5TH ADDITION
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's
and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States
District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for
the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing
any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this
certificate. From such examination, the company hereby certifies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit:
See Legal Description
REZEMEV)
2
SPOKANE VALbIEV
DEPARTMENI OP
COMMUNITY DEVEL~OMil9t
Page 1 of 4
t
Order No. SH-257938
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 26 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 1
SUMMERFIELD EAST ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 9,
SAID POINT BEING A 5/8" STEEL PIN FROM WHICH A 5/8" STEEL
PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PLAT NO. 4 OF WEST FARMS
IRRIGATED TRACTS ACCORDING TO BOOK `O' OF PLATS, PAGE 51,
BEARS NORTH o° 06'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2610.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1121.63 FEET TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3 OF SAID PLAT AND
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST THE FOLLOWING FOUR
COURSES:
NORTH 62 ° 21'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 192.94 FEET;
NORTH 40 ° 31'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 48.01 FEET;
NORTH 65°56149" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 128.00 FEET;
SOUTH 46 ° 13'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 114.31 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 32;
THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES:
NORTH 90 ° 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 469.10 FEET;
NORTH 79 ° 35'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 21 SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 28 OF PLATS, PAGES 21-22;
THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING THREE
COURSES:
NORTH 0° 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.36 FEET;
legal cont.
Page 2 of 4
c
Order No. SH-257938
legai cont.
NORTH 15°25137" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 39.42 FEET;
NORTH 0005'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 125.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90000'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 159.82 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 ° 11'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87055'06" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.37 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82°48'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72 ° 52'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.56 FEET;
THENCE SOUTN 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.14 FEET, FROM
WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST FARMS IRRIGATED
TRACTS BEARS NORTH 0006'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.42 FEET;
TNENCE SOUTH 0006'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 405.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED I N:
KJT INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Washington Limited Liability Company
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos.
46354.9122 and 46353.9074.
Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said
parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no
assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Trenfinrood Irrigation District No. 3.
Page 3 of 4
1
,
Order No. SH-257938
3. Reservations contained in deed, recorded on October 20, 1886 under Recording No. 946, as
follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be
ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be
necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal
and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same.
4. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer construction, referred
to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer
services. Please contact the Division of Utilities Billing Section for information (509) 477-3604.
DATED AS OF December 3, 2003 at 8:00 a.m.
TRANSNATIO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
ti
BY
For service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Sean Heath, Title Officer
ENCLOSURES:
Paragraph 2
Sketch
sc
Page 4 of 4
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
NORTH 7 2 O ARGONNE
S POKANE , WASH INGTON 99212
Prepared for:
Order No.: SH-257938
KJT LLC. Charge: $175.00
ATTN: KEN TUPPER Tax: $14.18
122 N. R.AYMOND
cc: USKH, Inc./Marks
S E C O N D
P L A T C F R T I F I C A T E
Certificate for filing Plat of :
SUMMERFIELD EAST 5TH ADDITION
In the matter of the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane County for
approval, this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor's
and Clerk's offices, and the records of the Clerk of the United States
District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for
the purpose herein specified, and is not to be used as a basis for closing
any transaction. Liability is limited to the amount, if any, paid for this
certif icate . From such examination, the company hereby certif ies the title
to the following described land, in said Spokane County, to-wit:
See Legal Description
h
~z> u ,4
~ •a
SPCXAiVE 1ff1L12~~'
DEPARTMFNT OF
COMMt1NiTY dgVet,ppN,$;)~t
Page 1 of 4
Order No. SH-257938
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWEST
QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 26 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 10, BLOCK 1
SUMMERFIELD EAST ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 9,
SAID POINT BEING A 5/8" STEEL PIN FROM WHICH A 5/8" STEEL
PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PLAT NO. 4 OF WEST FARMS
IRRIGATED TRACTS ACCORDING TO BOOK `O' OF PLATS, PAGE 51,
BEAxs NORTH o°06'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2610.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1121.63 FEET TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3 OF SAID PLAT AND
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST THE FOLLOWING FOUR
COURSES:
NORTH 62 ° 21'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 192.94 FEET;
NORTH 40 ° 31'S9" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 48.01 FEET;
NORTH 65 ° 56'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 128.00 FEET;
SOUTH 46° 13124" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 114.31 FEET TO TNE NORTHINEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 32;
THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDtTION THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES:
NORTH 90 ° 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 469.10 FEET;
NORTH 79 ° 35'S6" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 21 SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 28 OF PLATS, PAGES 21-22;
THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING THREE
COURSES:
NORTH 00 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.36 FEET;
legal cont.
Page 2 of 4
ti
Order No. SH-257938
legal cont.
NORTH 15025'37" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 39.42 FEET;
NORTN 0° 05'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 125.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 159.82 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 ° 11'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87°55106" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.37 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82°48102" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72 ° 52'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.56 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90 ° 00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.14 FEET, FROM
WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST FARMS IRRIGATED
TRACTS BEARS NORTH 0006'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.42 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0006'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 405.00 FEET TO THE
P01NT OF BEGINNING;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN:
KJT INVESTMENTS, LLC., a Washington Limited Liability Company
EXCEPTIONS:
1. Taxes and assessments, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos.
46354.9122 and 46353.9074.
Parcel Nos. are provided from the latest Assessor's Maps available to the Company. Said
parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no
assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Trenfinrood Irrigation District No. 3.
Page 3 of 4
. .
~
Order No. SH-257938
3. Reservations contained in deed, recorded on October 20, 1886 under Recording No. 946, as
follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be
ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be
necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved and excepted coal
and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same.
4. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer construction, referred
to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer
services. Please contact the Division of Utilities Billing Section for information (509) 477-3604.
DATED AS OF December 3, 2003 at 8:00 a.m.
TRANSNATIO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
BY 4 /
For service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Sean Heath, Title Officer
ENCLOSURES:
Paragraph 2
Sketch
sc
Page 4 of 4
\
a,... ....~~.L,..;~_.u.~ ._...~._......_:..:--_-.__...~.~4 „x..~..,,..:..,
St ff ~Jse Only) -
r_rrc Cg~,'Y OF SPO'rC}~(~l XLLEY „7-3
~~V~~~.~.~- Communrty Developi,tent Department
~ RECE?VED BY: ;
V Cur~ ent Plannmg Division ~ C3A7E SUBMITTED: d~ ~
11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 ~ ~
Spokane Valley, WA 99206 FILE NO./NAME: &u~
Tel • (509) 921-1000 ~
Fax. (509) 921-1008
planning(G-)snokaneva{lev orQ CURRENT PLANNING FEE:
- ENGINEERZNG FEE: ~
. - , ai..:.,.:.. _.e....
, o , .
FINAL. L,AND DIVIS~ON APPLICATION
PART I - APPLICATION TYPE
(Check One)
0 Final Plat ❑ Final Short Plat 0 Final Binding Site Plan
PA►RT It - APPLICATION lNFORMATION
PROJECT INFORMATiON: N0.l
PRELIMINARY PLAT F(LE NO./NAME: CpE~Z~ 7~'~ 1 Satvtivr~~..rLE~-s~ ~Asr ~h ~LT10..+
TAX PARCEL NO: 4 ir' 3< '-4. 9 7
STREET ADDRESS OF SITE:
NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED ON FINAL PLAT/ E'PtAcN: 19
NUMBER OF LOTS PROPOSED ON APPROVED PRELIMINARY PLATI • 4Gt
APPLICANT INFORMATION:
APPLtCANT ~,eN
, •
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: ~8l]Qjt.AjAG UALA-15-4 STATE: V\1A ZIP: _C~5ZC6"
PHONE: (14e10 EIWORK) 5'1A -Gt'2-L-t " {Z\1 (FA.:) Suq 'ci ~'2•- i~i ~ (CELL) '.~09 '0190-728G .
Please arcle
NOTE: lF APPLICANT lS NOT THE OWNER, INCLUDE WRlTTEN OWNER AUTHORIZATION FROM THE LEGAL OWNER BELOW:
OWNER INFORMATfON:
LEGAL OWNER: `JAM e />S p.eb.l t
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY: STATE: ZIp:
PHONE: (HOME/WORK) FAX} (CELL) .
Piease Carde
_G E4WD :
NOTE: ALL SUBMITTAL REQUIREiHENTS SPECIFIED IN THE FYNAL LANqW
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST SHALL BE SUBMITTED BEFORE THE FINAL PLAT/SHORT
PLAT/BINDIMG SITE PLAN APPLICATION WILl. BE RROCESSED. wi
SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF
Version 1 12i03 1 COMMUNI7Y DEVELOPMENT
,
PART lil - FINAL LAND DiVISION PROCEDURES
♦ The City's initial review of a final plat{short plat/binding site pian appfication takes approxirnately
thirty (30) calendar days from the date of a complete submittal
o During the 30-day review period, the City will distribute the final plat/short plat/binding site plan
application to other City departments and other affected agencies and organizations for their review
comments.
♦ After receipt of all review comments, these comments will be provided to the applicant so that
changes can be made to fhe final plat/short plat/binding site plan map and any associated
documents before submittal to the City of the mylar for signature and any other documents intended
for recording.
♦ The City will review the submitted mylar and associated documents to insure that all review
comments have been addressed. If all comments have not been addressed, the mylar and
associated documents will be returned to the applicant for further correction
♦ When all required comments have been addressed, the City will submit the mylar and associated
documents to the Spokanc County Auditor's Office for recording. Please note that the City
conducts recordings once a week only on Fridays In order to have a final plat/short plat/binding
site plan recorded, a final mylar and associated documents must be received by 5:00 p.m. the
Friday before your desired recording date.
- PART IV - KEY STEPS TO EXPEDITE THE PROCESStNG OF YOUR
FINAL LAND DIVISION APPLICATlON
♦ The final plat/short plaf/binding site plan must be prepared by a professional land surveyor in the
State of Washington.
♦ The final plat/short plat/binding site plan should be prepared in conformance with the Spokane
County Auditor's Requirements for the Recording of Plats (see attached) ,
♦ The final plat/short plat/binding site plan shall incorporate all conditions of approval imposed by the
hearing body and shall be prepared and certified by a professional land surveyor.
♦ Submit of a final platlshort plat/binding site plan shall be made within five (5) years of the date of
preliminary approval, unless an extension of time has been granted pursuant to the City's
Subdivision Ordinance.
♦ Submit at time of application nine (9) full-size paper copies and one (1) 8'/2 x 11 reduction of all
final plat/short plat/binding site plan sheets.
♦ All references on the face of the platlshort plat/binding site plan to the City shall say City of
Spokane Valley.
• Show drainage facilities proposed for private ownership or public dedication, private streets and
common open space if provided as tracts of land on the face of the final plat/short plat/binding site
plan
♦ Show all monuments found, set, reset, replaced or removed, describing their kind, size and location
and other data relating thereto.
♦ Show bearing trees, corner accessories or witness monuments, basis of bearings, bearing and
length of lines, scale of map and north arrow.
♦ Show any other data necessary for the intelligent interpretation of the various items and locations of
the points, lines and areas shown. -
♦ Show ties to adjoining surveys of record.
♦ The allowable error of mathematical closure for the final plat/short plat/binding site plan map shall
not exceed 1 foot in 80,000 feet or 0.04 foot, whichever is greater.
♦ Bearings and lengths are to be shown for all lines; no ditto marks are to be used.
♦ Arrows shall be used to show limits of bearings and distances whenever any chance of
misinterpretation could exist.
Version 1. 12/03 2
♦ Plat boundary and street monument Iines having curves shall show radius, arc, central angle and
tangent for each curve and radial bearings where curve is intersected by a nontangent line. Spirai
curves shall show chord bearing and length.
♦ Lots along curves shall show arc length along curve and radial bearings at lot corners. If a curve
table is provided, it shall show angle for each segment of the curve along each lot, arc length,
tangent length, and radius. Radial bearings along lot lines will not be required.
♦ All dimensions shall be shown in feet and hundredths of a foot. All bearings and angles shall be
shown in degrees, minutes and seconds
♦ When efevations are needed on the final plat/short plat/binding site plan, permanent bench mark(s)
shall be shown on the final plat/short platlbinding site plan in a location and on a datum plane
approved by the Public Works Director or designee
♦ The final plat/short plat/binding site plan shall indicate the actual net area for each platted lot
exclusive of the right-of-way. Lots one (1) acre and over shall be shown to the closest hundredth of
an acre, and all other lots shall be shown in square feet.
♦ Monumentation shall be established as required by the City's Standards for Road and Sewer
Construction, as amended In addition, every lot corner shall be marked with an iron rod or iron pipe
marked in a perrr}anent manner with the registration number of the professional land surveyor.
PART V- LEGAL OWNER SICNATURE
(Si nature of legal owner or representative as authorized by legal owner)
\
(print name) SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT THE
ABOVE RESPONSES~ARE E TkUTHFULLY AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I FURTHER SWEAR OR AFFIRM THAT I AM THE OWNER OF RECORD OF THE AREA
PROPOSED FOR THE ABOVE IDENTIFIED LAND USE ACTION, OR, IF NOT THE OWNER,
ATTACHED HEREWITH IS WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE OWNER AUTHORIZING MY
ACTIONS ON HIS/HER BEHALF.
ADD
RESS. PHONE: QZ y 1
Z I P:
v(City) (State)
t~
(Signatu ) (Date)
NO TARY
(For Part IV above)
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss:
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this day of :~IFr f r.~-P , 2003
NOTARY SEAL
Notary Pubt~c NOTARY SIGNATURE
te of Washington Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
FCoDARLAEWILSON
MMISSION EXPIRES Residing at:
March 25, 2006
. . .
My appointment expires: _I Y a'k r h a 5r 2:mI/7
Version 1 12/03 3
DEC-22-2003 13:46 FROM:LUKES ACCT
509-927-1074 T0:9220195 P.001,001
t,tfi~+3 S'53N.,olo(?d 19;H t
SLTZ"LITc"0 1Ld~ ~~--1--_,
-UV3Wd413/13(3 A1Nf1WW0o ':i"QL~~ 29, )glo .40
~o ltv3w.~aed3a 11~ a ~T~ p y~g ~p~l
~l3llb/13NN>i0dS 33
.
(jQ~ 0
E~DZ Z ~ ~
Z 330
.
;
Ao7,~'
vci
- . . ~~x'
3/tl3038 ~ 6/~
0 .~;l i,
- ~ Idi9ooH xL Alunoo a~. uuiqod
E;
'C`ri. ~►C : ..~•~t~.., r . ~--7.-~~- _
- - - - - - - . _ _ _ . _ , _ - ~ _ . - -
_ . - • - - - - - - - ~ _ _ _ - _w.. . ; _ - - • -
• L + ,
- _ - - - - - . . - ° - _ . _ _ - • _ _ _ , i . _ .
{
. ~
. ~ - - - - . - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ ti - - -
i
- - ~ - - - • - - ' • - - - -
t~
- ~ • - - + - - - - - - - - _ • - • .
{ .
- - - - • - - ^ - - - - ~ . . ,
1
~ ~ r... . . _ . ' _ ~
~
~
' ` ' • . ~
~
. 07-• ~ .
L
DEG-22-2003 MON 01:51PM ID: ~
PACE:1
~v~^M+~ ~ Z'R+'Aii~'~`yY,i_f` a!~.,~,i '74 f° - ~:~Li'~ ~ ~4~W'afC~ ~"i • "~.,vF:+Y . a'^'~~..~f ~~•'~~t - ,
KJT,,LLC 2333'~~r, ' .
~ . ~122.N RAYMOND SUfTE 3"
,28-7,1~7413251.`, ~
.SP6KANE,WA'~99206 ~ . . ' -Date-~, ~ ~ . 126
. ' ' , _ - ~ , . , ' • v:...... . e.._,'~i~:
Pay tri thg -
Orderaj , ~ ~ ° . - ~--:1~ ~ •
• ' , " ~.J ` - \ ~ , • - - • -ti f''>.
. `
~ -
`J`~. ~ ~ Dollars, . L'1 , ~q.ws.nwn~~;,
' Anylimo Llne 1-868-678-7800 A rY'` ~
~ STf R~..1 N~ stert~ng , vate Bankang -
sterlingsavi pg sb3nk.not
SAVINGS' BANt< ~~Q Banltng
llt N Vta11 St
Al1 7rie Bmeh Yov'(I EJrY Xrsd 0 Spokane WA 99201
• For
1:3 25 L? 17 t,01: 59990 306 79 7u' 2333 `
OCiorke Rinnran
.
,
CITY OF SPOKA,NE VALLEY Date: 1,~ -93v73
,
ReceYpt for Pianning DivisYOn Fees By:
~ Appiicant/Business Permit #
Project Name n .14
Site Address ,
Piease receipt the foi[owing:
Check Number a 3~"~ Cash CC
Payer's Name Li_ '
Address CitY 47~,rkfD.,.~-.... Zip
.
U
9 ~
`Za - M Piann''ng - i~ri[sio e '`e"d 018.05 8.321.70.01 Entertainment License
001.05 8.05 8.321.90.02 Home Profession
001.45 8.05 8.321.90.03 Cond'rtiona[ Use Permits
001.058.058.321.10.90 Temporary Use Permit Fee
44: PIanning ~g~s fo~ ,=~oci 8L Se ~ ce _ - R~~' Ve~ ~ ML
.
001.05 8.05 8.345.83.01 Rezones
001.058.058.345.83.02 ConditionaC Use Permit "
001.05 8.05 8.345.83.03 Prelim. Short Subdivision
001.05 8.03 8.345.83.04 Short Subdivision
001.058.058.345.83.05 PreCiminary Subd'nrision ~
001.058.058.345.83.06 FinaC Subdivision 001.058.058.345.83.07 Shoreiine Dev. Permit
001.058.058.345.83.08 Prelim. Binding Site Plan
001.05 8.45 8.345 .83.12 Zero Lot Line
001.058.058.345.83.13 Certificate of Exemption
001.058.058.345.83.14 PCat Modifications
001.05 8.05 8.345.83.15 Change of Conditions
001.058.058.345,83.16 Admin. Decision Appeal
001.058.058.345.83.17 Zoning Map Amendments
001.058.058.345.83.18 Administrative Variance
001.058.058.345.83.19 Variance
001.058.058.345.83.21 SEPA Review
001.0580'058.345.83.22 Pianned Unit Development
001.058.058.345.83.23 Sign Review
001.058.058.345.83.24 Code Text ,Amendment
00 i.05 8.05 8.345 .83.25 Administratinre Exception
001.058.058.345.83.26 Site Plan Review
001.058.058.345.89.03 Appeai of H.E. Decision 001.058.058.345.89.04 Comp. Plan ,Amendment
001.05 8.05 8.345.89.05 SaYes of Maps ,
TOTAi, FEES
, ,
~
~
~ ~
's , ~
~ , c c '
c ;
' THE DESlGN IMPROVEMEfYTS SHOWN HER~N AND lDENT7FlEQ AS 5TH AQDtTION HAVE ~ BEEN EXA~IINED AfYD AFPROVED THIS DAY, DAY OF , 2003.
~ _
; ,
~ a .a t t
i ~ s .
s rwooo ~~~c~noN b~ icr ti ~3 ; M E KLEIN, MANAGER ~ . . . . ~
~ s
t . . . . ~ ~ ~ )F~~ F eNn r~n F-A
~ ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~ ~ Y-~s -u~ , 'ROFILE AND ~
5642 : 35641 ~ , f SPOKANE VALLEY FlRE QEPARTMENT ~
` KEViN MlLIER, pEPUTY FlRE MARSHALI .my. . ~ LN D_ NLOT F ~
- . . . . ! ~ ~ ~ W.,, •
, ~ . . . . ~ ~ 'X, 5643 35644
t ; s c ~ / ~ I ~ ~ 1 A 1
~ 1 ' ~ i ~ 2 ~ J ~ 1 ~
. S S r , j 1 ~ ,
i ~ I ~ a `ir
r~ ~ ~ 1 1 ~
S ♦ y J , r ~ ' ~~f f ~ ' ~
i" • ~ ~S ~ ^ ~
~ ~ , _ ~ i ~ f ,r ~ ~ ~ \ ~ q~ !
~ ~ SCAtE. 1 -200 , 'y ~ ..~,C,~'. ; ~
~ 4 ~ ~ ~t 4.r~.9 ~ ) ~ , ~:,t ~~t N ~ 1 t { ~ b~'lii~ '~i ~ + ~ tt• ~ t~~~~ ~y41~>~~' ~ EY
t t ° ~;~,i s,~" f.~d . . . t ~ , , SPOKANE VA ' , , , , LLEY )F pMENTfi
S DEPARTMENT OF , EC ~i~ t ~ ~ ,r-~- D RIPTION EXIST(NG PROPOSED COMMt1NiTY DEUELOP;~~N'
_,t s , ~ ~ ~ ~ i S ~ 1 , ' , r ~ , } ~ , _
, :f ~ ~ ~ . UGHT POLE r~"i ~ ; ! F ir j ~y s a r,,' _ _ ~
~ i ~ 3 ~ ~ S ' • ~ . ` \ i ~ -.g , ~ , j . POWER POLE
____..t___., ~s , ` Id ~ \ .
~ ~ e __T -.y.~..__~, t i ~ , 5 ~ t t I y~j EX S~ING TREE ION NOTFS:
, ' ~ ; r•.~ ' ' S ~ I ~ ~
w
~
b'l`,Y•r=„°•r' 4y'o!~ay ~^;i'~":~ F•R~-n.:° `3..~'~a'.~ T2.=-•f::.:s~•-Y~~~lti =}r ~r ,rC..1.` ~ ,
_ ~ ti1 ~ .n" :}M y I;J.r r ....~i.'C.~`•:L C'i`s~ {a{~'{~_t ~r'~~~~ =.~9ii ~r~^' ~(~s3~i,,I„a:~~ tiir.o.~ t4~ 'y`3'r4~i~~.2,,~.,~~ ~,~,~~{r';.Fy _
~ • ~i• ~ ✓ r s 4 ~6 ~C
~•~(y •c~,'X~~7fi .L.:^`~'" :'cv'•`,... :w,,,sJS,`~"r~`~~
~;CONIN9UNI~'Y,~D dEVELOPM~NTi DEPARTI!1E~lT~~
; ~tr.~~ , tY.~ ' :-~S' .f ~.~tix~..~^•~.'~~• ~ L j
~3~ , • .4 *;~,~+d`G. k
Spo~.~.e
fs..a~~ ~ L
r
T ;;CURRENTO P.~L'AN.NIi~G`'~~,{~;;'~<~~~.~~.~~;~~~-•:-
`''SaCw~ .i -<i.r~- •r a~ ! 1 8••- -'b" ty.~,,.,~' s L' ,v;~'~ ~
f~''~:~ 7,'~•t ~t c 4..';~%'7~b i~'~iA~ n~~~ ~~~~.~w~_ r4i~.`~y~`5~.~ 4~.4_"S~~' C~~~~ ° ~q,::~a ~t`~ ~•,'r ~ i~"~4~ ~r •,r ~-i . :.r v ~ ar ~ ~ ~ ~?'.»'n, a i
i~ y,•, ryt rs n 1r :fa7.i_i 3"...:oe ''~r~'~~ ~~..i„~t£.a^cS:... ~~c.r» .~a.. '~"~'~sh..,r.~ k.,1a` .:~.3~t "T tF`i;,ySf2"✓ri~ ±si
FINAL LAND DIVISION
SUBMITTAL. CHECKLIST
. . ~ ~~.m""~c ,~~o-~ ~ r:~-- r ~k,~; ~~-~.~-~tts'~°~ .,,~,.~:•;-~~~"r~Ti~<.k~+c~R~~.~<r . 1
PART I- GENERAL REQUIRIEMENTS FOR FINAL PLAT/FINAL SHORT PLATS/FINAL
BINDING SITE PLANS
Completed Submittal Checklist
~ Completed Application Form - Submit com leted a lica#ion on the attached form w"
P pp ~th all
signature b9ocks completed.
Required Apalication Feesl pursuant to the City's adopted Fee Schedule consisting of:
LJ Current Planning Division Final Plat Fee (check if applicable)
❑ Current Planning Division Final Short Plat Fee (check if applicable)
Engineering Division Review Fee (required for all submitted applications)
Four (4) copies of the Plat Certificate, prepared by a Title Company dedicating streets, areas
intended for other public use, and granting of easements for slope and utilities. The Plat
Certificate sha(I be prepared and valid within six (6) months of final plat app(icafiion filing.
[~J A Water Plan signed by the applicant, water purveyor, fire district, Regional Health District,
and State Department of Health OR a water and fire district letter of existing water system
adequacy.
Letters of easement acce tance from rivate utilit rovider
p p y p s(e.g. Avista Utilities, Comcast,
Qwest), if applicable.
❑ PLEASE NOTE. YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT TWD SEPARATE CHECKS FOR THE
RECORDING OF THE MYLAR WITH THE SPOKANE COUNTY AUDITOR AND FOR THREE
(3) COPIES OF THE RECORDED MYLAR FOR USE BY THE CITY'S BUILDING,
ENGINEERING AND PLANNING DIVISIONS. YOU WILL BE NOTIFIED OF THE AMOUNT
OF THE REQUIRED CHECKS AT TIME OF YOUR SUBMITTAL OF THE MYLAR FOR
SIGNATURE TO THE CITY.
PART II - CONTENT REQUIREMENTS FOR FINAL PLAT/FINAL SHORT PLAT/FINAL
BINDING SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Submit nine (9) 24 inch by 36 inch paper copies and one (1) 81/2 x 11 reduced version of the
final plat/short plat/binding site plan2 The final plat/short plat/binding site plan shall be a legibly
drawn, printed, or reproduced permanent map, and shall have a minimum size of twenty-four
(24) by thirty-six (36) inches. The minimum scales shall be either 1 inch = 50 feet or 1 inch =
' The Current Planning Division does not charge a final binding site plan fee. The fee for the review of
the final binding site plan is incorporated into the preliminary binding site plan review fee. The City's
Engineering Division, however, charges for the rev►ew of the final binding site plan.
2 A mylar or "silver slick" of the final plat/short plat/binding site plan shall be submitted for City
signature at the completion of the City's final review process. Mylars and si%r 10ygld not be
submitted at time of initial final land division application - if submitted at ation, the
application wilf be deemed incomplete and will be returned.
DEC 2 2 2003
' SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOFMENT
~
♦
100 feet. If approved by the Director, an appropriate scale may be used which does not exceed
1 inch = feet provided a 1 inch = 400 feet reduced copy is also submitted. The final
plat/short plat/binding site plan shall contain the following minimum information:
a. A two (2) inch margin shall be provided on the left edge and a one-halr" (1/2) inch margin
shall be provided at the other edges of the plat. If more than one sheet is required, each
_ sheet shall show sheet numbers for the total sheets.
b. North arrow and scale shall be shown.
c. The name of the subdivision, city project file number, location by section, township and
range shall be shown.
d. The legal description shall be shown.
e. A distinct wide boundary line shall delineate the boundary of the subdivision.
f. The location and widths of streets, alleys, rights-of-way, easements (use a dashed line to
indicate boundary of easements), parks and open spaces proposed within the subdivision
and those existing immediately adjacent to the subdivision shall be shown. Areas to be
dedicated to the pubiic must be Iabeled.
g. Layout and names of adjoining subdivisions and replats shall be shown with a dashed line
within and adjacent to the subdivision boundary, _
h. The fayout, lot and block numbers, and dimensions of all lots shall be shown.
, i. Street names shall be shown.
j. Str-eet addresses for each lot shall be shown within the boundaries of each lot. Street
addresses will be assigned by the Current Planning Division during the finaf
review process and shall be required to be shown on the myfar submitted for
City signature.
k. Plat restrictions required as conditions of preliminary plat approval shall be shown.
1. Appropriate utility easements shall be shown.
m. All special statements of approva( required from governmental agencies, including those
pertaining to flood hazard areas, shorelines, critical areas, and connections to adjacent
state highways shall be shown.
n. Drainage facilities proposed for private ownership or public dedication, private streets
and common open space if provided sha(I be located in separate tracts of land on the
face of the final plat, with each tract of land listed alphabetically (e.g, Tract A. Tract B,
etc.).
o. A certification signed by a licensed professional land surveyor registered in the State of
Washington stating that, where required, the final plat was surveyed and prepared by
himself/herself, or under his/her supervision, that plat is a true and correct
representation of the subject land, and that monumentation has been established as
required by City standards.
p. The following signatures are required on the final plat:
i. Spokane Valley Public Works Director or designee
ii. Spokane Valley Community Development Director
iii. Spokane County Utilities Director
iv. Spokane Regional Health District
v. Spokane County Treasurer
vi. Spokane County Assessor
vii. Auditor's Certificate Recording Block/Signature Line
q. Notes and other statements required as conditions of preliminary plat approval shall be
shown on the face of the final plat.
FINAL LAND DIVISION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Page 2 of 3
Version 1: 12/03 p:\communtty development\current pfanning\forms\forms\final land divisionsVinal land
division checklist.doc
~
i
PAR.T III -RECORI) OF SURVEV' REQUIF2.EMENTS FOR FINAL BINDING SITE PLAn1S
O N LY
Pursuant to Section 12.500.138 (Record of Survey) of the Interim Subdivision Ordinance a
record of survey may be filed subsequent to the recording of a final binding site plan to
establish lots within the boundaries of the final binding site plan. The following
information shall be provided on the record of survey:
a. The survey shall be of a size required by the County Auditor. If more than one sheet is
required, each sheet shall show sheet numbers for the total sheets.
b. The binding site plan file number shall be referenced.
c. The minimum scales shall be J. inch = 50 feet or 1 inch = 100 feet. If approved by the
Director, an appropriate scale may be used which does not exceed 1 inch = 200 feet,
provided a 1 inch = 400 feet reduced copy is provided.
d. A distinct wide boundary line shall delineate the boundary of the lot(s) shall be drawn.
The boundary of the binding site plan shall be indicated and any lot(s) that have been
created by filing of the final binding site plan and/or record of survey.
e. Each lot shall be numbered consecutively, and the size of each lot shall be indicated on
- the record of survey.
f. The location and widths of streets, alleys, rights-of-way, and easements (use a dashed
line to indicate easements) within the binding site plan and those existing immediately
adjacent to the lot being created shall be shown.
g. Street names shall be shown.
h. Street addresses fior each lot shall be shown within the boundaries of each lot. Street
addresses will be assigned by the Current Planning Division during the finat
review process and shall be required to be shown on the mylar submitted for
City signature.
i. Restrictions required as conditions of preliminary approval shall be shown.
j. Appropriate utility easements (use a dashed line to indicate boundaries of the
easements) shall be shown.
k. Certification of the licensed professional land surveyor.
1. The following signatures are required on the record of survey:
i. Spokane Valley Community Development Director
ii. Property Owner
m. Illustrate any existing buildings located on the lot which is being created.
FINAL LAND DIVISION SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Page 3 of 3
Version 1: 12/03 p•\community development\current planning\iorms\forms\final land divisions\final land
division checklist.doc
c
r
C14 j
m
- N
W y ~
~ W
Lo
Q
S ' ^
LL
/
° N
FINAL PLA T pF NT
~ 5UMMERFIELC) . rn
EA5T FIFTH m
ADD tn
IT 0 .
DE rN& A SUBDlVIS{p
5EG 710N N IN A POR T10N OF '
. RA 35, TOWNSH IP 26 Np ~
NGE 44 EqST, WILLAM RT~' `
,
' SPOXANE ~p ErrE MER IDlAN ,
~ UNTY, INASKIN
GT4N
;
Ln EN6lNEE1qIN(~ ~ gURV ~
~ C-"NG • IdLqIV1Y1N~ . T
' ~ ESTlIYC~
; A SUBS/D/ARy pF ` 0 1NYq E
? 3/25/03 f~ N. N~1N.,~'ERIIVQ INC. LJft%(H
HOW,QqD sT.
679302MLT,pWG SPOKANF, WA "201 j SH~T 1 OF 2 PHDNE Sp9i0t TNiq/H ROAD
F'QX (508} ,3?,g~4423 9 'LEW/ST~ID &F6a1
.
N ' PHONE 74s 26s1
llzr FAX (20i8) T466825
m ~
CID
cv m .
m
m
~ - -
. rn
Ln
v N
~
~ M
m
m
m N
m
m kD
~
N
cn ~
~ Q
~
m
rIY~
USKH
08/ 19! 2003 12: 45 5093280423
~
~
a
r`
St
~
~
PRELJMrNARY STREET ADDRE55E5
: .
GURREGTF_D NUMClERS MuSr LX ODTAIN£D FROM
SPOKANL GOUNTY Q1JRtNG THE BUfLDiNG PERMlT
PRUGE55.
Lor 1 BLOC,K 22 5242 N. GAL.VttV ROAO
14508 E. QXEN A VIE~.
LOr 2 BLOGK 22 14516 6: QtJEEN AVE.
LOT 3 6LOGK 22 14608 ff. QUEEN AVE.
zr LOT 4 DLOGJC 22 14614 E QUEEN AI/E.
LOT 5 8L4~'.K 22 14622 E QUEEN AVE
LOT b 8t.0UC 22 14706 E. QUEEN A VE.
; . LOT 7 BLOGJG 22 14 712 E. QUEEN AUE.
LOT 8 BLaGK 2.2 14720 E. QUEEN AVE.
LOT 1 DZOGK 23 5222 N. GAL.VtN ROAD
t14505 E. QUEEN AVE.
LOT 2 DLOGK 23 14513 E. Qt1EEN AvE.
LOT 3 8LC3GK 23 14611 E. QUEEN A1/E.
L07 4 BLOGK 23 14617 E. QUEEN AVE.
LOT 5 BLOUG 23 14703 E. QUEEN AVe.
L4T 6 BLOGK 23 1470q E. QUEEN AVE,
- L4T 7 4LOGK 23 14715 E. QUEEN AVE
~ LaT 1 BLOE,Jr 24 5I15 N. GALVIN ROAO
,
LOT 2 DLaCK 24 5205 N. GALVIN ROAC)
LOT 3 5LOGK 24 5211 N. GALVIN ROAO
4
LOT 4 15LOC,1C 24 5219 N. GALVIN ROAD
r
k
It
e
w
f'
/ n .
LOl `
~O
PAGE . 03
5093260423
,.ir, 4 c x'AR3 12 : 53
08/19/2003 12:45 5093280423 USKH PAGE 01
ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING • PLANNING • MATERIALS TESTING
~
• . . -~e avne. _ _ ~o~sy ot
!J~'CM
ce ~
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
TO: Chris Fracz DATE: July 23, 2003
CO: Avista Util►ties PROJ.: Summerfreld Vh Addirion
DEPT: Constnuction Design Represenfative SUBJ.: Residenfiai Development
FAX#: 777-5303 W.O.#: 679302
NO. OF PAGES (Including this transmittal): 4
The information in this faz is confidential and proprietary and is intended only for the individual
or entify named on the cover sheet. If you do not r+eceive all of ihe pages or have received this
fax in error, p/ease notify us immediately ai (509) 328-5139.
ORIGINAL:
x KEPT IN OFFICE
TO FOLLOW VIA:
Regular Mail Courier Overnight E-mail
Serviae
MESSAGE:
Ni Chrls,
Attached is the schedule thaE was issued during our pre-eonstruction rneeting with the Contractor, Eller Corp. The
utilities show to be installed beginning August 13, 2003.
Hi Dave,
I have attached the addresses for you on this same fax If you have any additional quesfions, please feel firee to contact me at 328-5139.
Thanks for your help.
Lisa
CC: Quest: Dave Hutchison ! Kevin Humphry fax:455-2104
SIGNED Lisa Lozano Frey, F.1.T.
DEPARTMENT Civil Engineering
WYATT ENGINEERING, INC. iM httpwww uakot eorn
CI 101 7hain Roaa Lew491cn, ID 63901 pnone• (208) 746-2681 fax: (208) 746-8825
■ 1220 Nor1h Howard Spokano, wA 99281 pnone: (509) 323-5139 fo. (509) 328-0423
AUG 16 2003 12:53 5093280423 PAGE.01
r- ^
~
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
S#Mane CURRENT PLANNING
j~lFINAL alley
REVIEW CHECKLIST
~
M PLAT ❑ SHORT PLAT O BINDING SITE PLAN
PROJECT INFORMATION
Project NumberA---)2,06 -79 Date Submitted: 7 l4 / 0 3
Project Name,!~t- Ae/ Parcel Number: C143„53. 9~7VL' y63sy, 9~o zZ.
b
SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
~ Nine (9) copies of the proposed final with dedication.
❑ Three (3) copies of the final plat certificate (not older than 6 months of recording plat).
Property outlines in red on a current Spokane County Assessor's Map(s) by surveyor to
assure location within the accuracy of the City map.
❑ A Water Plan signed by the applicant, water purveyor, Fire District, Spokane Regional Health
District, and State Department of Health or a letter from the water district and fire district stating
that the existing water system is adequate.
❑ Letters of easement acceptance from utility purveyors:
A) Phone D) Electricity
B) Water E) Sewer
C) Gas 21:z ~P o3 F) Other
,
❑ Final Short Plat, Plat, or BSP review fee:
$ Receipt No. Date accepted
❑ Final Site Development Plan (PUD) review fee:
$ Receipt No. Date accepted
❑ Detailed landscape plan with plant list, cost estimates, letter of assurance to
install landscaping per plan and estimate, PUD's especially.
AGENCY COMMENTS
❑ City Engineer Date received:
❑ Utilities Division Date received:
❑ Spokane Regional Health District Date received:
❑ Fire District No. Date received:
~ Date received :
~ Date received :
~ Date received :
Page 1 of 3
A
/
. ` ;
MAP AND DEDICATION REVIEW
Review
Date By
Final Plat legible, proper format and "silver slick" or mylar sheet
Sheet si : Z4" x 36" fo lats/BSP and 18" x 24" for Short Plat 3
,
❑ Washington State registered surveyor's stamp,~nature a~ ate
z ✓
❑ Check project name, file num er, section, townships and range
~ North arrow and scale (1" = 50'; 1" = 100'; 1" = 200') z ~
1~,~•~o~ ,
Bold line of plat/short plat/BSP boundary
✓ ✓ ~ ~ ~
❑ Design, block and lot number , dimensions of lots and area of lots
❑ Appropriate frontage/setback per zone standards at building line,
including cul-de-sac lots
~ Check lot sizes with conditions of approval and Zoning Code 7~y13 JV
Street address for each lot or tract, drafted on mylar
~
,c~ Number and type of lots with specific conditions of approval -
Name, location and width of existing and proposed streets, rights-of-way,
degress/egress, easements and one-foot strips A7 7// y./.~
~ ,JYA Dashed line for access easements
Check owner and vested parties (Plat Certificate to Dedication) 7~4.r
Legal description proofed (Plat Certificate to Dedication)
Check dedication with conditions of preliminary plat approval '7// v ~ 3
~ Check easements, clouds on property, owner, parties of interest, ~
etc., from title company "Plat Certificate"
Agency Signature blocks
Check PUD setbacks/fencing requirements
Check for compliance with Shorelines Management Act
00 Special check for "Future Acquisition Area" and prepare title notice
❑ Check private covenants for Zoning Code conflicts
Page2of3
i
REVIEW COMMENTS
The fo/lowing review comments were provided to: Date By
Surveyor/Engineer
Applicant ❑ Need City Engineer's approval
❑ Need Utilities' approval
❑ Need Spokane Regional Health District approval
❑ Need recording fee of ~l n , check payable to:
Spokane County Auditor
❑ Need to pay property taxes (Contact County Treasurer's Office)
❑ RLX-r ~ZZuJ L64
~
❑ Lo~~
❑ ~!.~!0-4- /i-t"''~ ~ ~~•-~,~i1 ~ ~ Q ~t~¢e-~, /J,~.4- ~I coA2r, 4//
~ ci t • ,
y ~s f 0
❑ /~1~/LG~L..a ,f.... ,Q..a,/r',.t.11
❑ l_x,c.e..~ ~,L- ~..n.~..a~4C~.o,►a.Z~ ~ li-~,~. ~~~~..e~
~
❑ 2A,s-..,1
❑ lLQ-~-c%.~-~J t.r ,o t-~~ Z~~e~G~ .
d /
~
❑ G/
/
❑
❑
Page 3 of 3
. WYATT ENGINE&ING., INC,
A SUBSIDIARY OF USKH, INC, .
TO ~~n ~Q`, ,
G-1 • DATE
'M-qpc4r+►,-zvl.f o(: Ckim rn~c~~.f
024,70 PRO J E CT N A M E
C ✓(r' ~~'L-~-' ~~r? I n
r. Q~~ P 0 T NUMBER
~ 0 4~&p
~
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA THE FOLLAWING ITEMS:
❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ PRINTS ❑ PLANS ❑ SAMPLES ❑ SPECIFICATIONS
❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ CHANGE OROER ❑
COPIES DATE OR N0. DESCRIPTION 1 *2 *3
~
p 3 ~~-X - V,
rlc, PIa4- cAxmmoAo _ -d
Eo G -N-,
~
j ZA-x
*1- NO EXCEPTIONS NOTED
J U L 0 9 2003
*2-REVISE 8► RESUBMIT
*3-REJECTED SPOKANE VALLEY
DEPARTMENT OF
COMMUNITY DEVELQPtAENT
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED:
❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION
❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS
><FOR REVIEW a COMMENT ❑ ❑
/ ❑ FOR BIOS DUF 20 ❑
,
REMARKS:
~'14 ~
~X
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINOLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE.
lol~
COPIES TO SI NED'
` 1220 NORTH HOWARD SPOKANE, WA 99201 PH. (509) 328-5139 FAX (509) 328-0423 ~
ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS )
I
~intc.en
v
♦
~ SPOKAN~ COUNTY DIVISION OF. LANNING
FINAL PLATISHORT PLATI6SP/PUD REVIEW
Date SUbmitted: ,2 1,-2 i/"~ 3 ProjecUFile No.: 1,~~ ~7S
Parcel No(s): ~//s31157y• Plat Expiration Date:
Gle~?333 ~ f0714
Date Initial Applicant Submittal Requirements
1. Nine (9) paper copies of proposed final with dedication
2. Four (4) copies of final plat certificate (current w/in 6 mo.)
3. Current Assessors map showing property outlined in red,
identify final phases
4. Letters of easement acceptance from:
Phone Purvevor
Power Purveyor ~ Cable Purvevor
Gas Purveyor
Sewer Purveyor
Water Purveyor
5. Fees: Final PIaUShort PIaUBSP $
Final PUD Plan
bi /19 Engineers review: 100.00
TOTAL FEES $ k
AGENCY REVIEW
Circulation letter sent: 14 day comment period ends: GO~-`Azi o7~~
Responses
Regional Health D,~re District
Engineering ~ Sewer District
Utilities ~ Water District
Other: ~ Other:
Notes:
Review comments were mailed/faxed to:
En9ineer/SurveYor:
4~.'4
-
Applicant: ~ date:
~ PNo,
MAP & DEDICATION REVIEW Date Initial
- 1. Section Township Range 7 l ,
2. - Washington registered surveyor signature, date and stamp
3. Sheet size: 24" X 36" for plat/PUD/BSP
18" X 24" for short plat
4. North arrow and scale 1001"=200')
5. Bold line of plat/short plat/PUD/BSP
6. Dashed line for access easements
7. Location and width of proposed streets, rights-of-way,
easements, open space; indicate 1' strips
8. StreeUroad names
9. Addresses drafted on mylar ~ 3~
10. Check lot sizes with conditions of~pproval and Zoning Code
11. Appropriate setback/buffers per conditions of approval
12. Appropriate frontage, including cul-de-sacs -9 /D-77
13. Check PUD setbacks/fencing requirements 4 19-
K16:--, Design, lot and block numbers, dimensions and area of lots 9 /a.-7
15. Check dedication for conditions of preliminary plat approval
16. Number and type of units with specific conditions of approvl 1D~AAZ-7 ~
17. Check "Plat Certifcate" for easements, clouds on property,
owners, parties of interest, etc.. 2/~7
~ Legal description proofed (tile report to dedication) a/-2 7
19. Agency signature blocks ~-1;;-`7 S~
20. Detailed landscape plan (PUD) with plant list and cost U
estimates A451
21. Compliance with Shorelines ~1 fq- v
22. Compliance with Critical Areas Ordinances
23. Title Notice for "Future Acquisition Area" or other
24. BoCC Resolution typed and proofed (Plat/PUD)
25. Taxes paid?
26. Auditor recording fee
AODITIONAL ITEMS TO CO PLETE:
/ ;3' - 1,e 4,91 X.PG,e ~10o H GW .c-A h - -Y4 al ~/vv P'! -e ~ 5
vt7', ,~tl C4-0,1 5-e Ge,"f 7'/ 7'
/V-e el
.
R -7 lek A y
t4oo -
~ ~T F
0T ES
N - -
~ _ -
s
_ • - "
. -
~ ~ ~
~
• ~ ' ' ~ _ r -
' •
• .
- - _ ,
~ -
~ -
- ~
_ ~ •
, • ~ .
- .
~
~
- • • ~
- •
-
• i-
s
! -
-
, _
_
~ ~ -
.
~
-
~
.
~
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF PLANNING
ILE
DATE: February 28, 2003
TO: Ken Tupper Wyatt Engineering
122 N. Raymond 1220 N. Howard
Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99201
FROM: ~ John Pederson, Planning Supervisor
RE: Status of Pending Land Use Action
File # PE-1206-78, Summerfield East, 5`h Addition, Final Plat
In recognition of formal incorporation of the City of Spokane Valley and to continue
processing of pending land use actions, please be advised that the Spokane County
Division of Planning will transfer the above-referenced project file to the City of Spokane
Valley on April 1, 2003.
Prior to April 1, 2003, the Division of Planning will make every effort to complete your
_ project or reach a reasonable milestone under Spokane County Public Works Application
Review Procedures For Project Permits. If the pending project is not complete, the
project file will be transferred to the City of Spokane Valley for further processing.
If you have any questions about your project status or need additional information, please
contact me at your convenience.
c: Board of County Commissioners
Gerry Gemmill, Assistant to Chief Executive Officer
James Harris, Interim Planning Director, City of Spokane Valley
MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, W.ASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE. (509) 477-7200 • FAX• (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133
i
~
~ -7
~
~
~
~
S p O K A 1-4 E C O U 1-4 T Y
41t,
A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DIVIS(OiV OF PLANNIlVG
MElVIORANDUM
TO: Division of Engineering and Roads, Transportation Engineering, Scott
Engelhard, c/o Sandy Kimball
' Division of Engineering and Roads, Development Setvices, John Hohman
Division of Utilities, Inforination Services, Jim Red
Division of Utilities, Stormwater Utility, Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
Spokane County Auditor, Recording - Tom Perkins
Spokane County Fire District No. 1
Trentvvood Irrigation District
Spokane County Division of Building and Code Enforcement - Jeff Forry
ohn Pederson, Planning Supervisor
J
FROMy
DATE February 25, 2003
SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat oFSurnnerfield East 5"' Addition, PE-1206-78
Parcel No. 46354.9022
Attached are copies of the above referenced final plat. Please review and forward any
comments to me by March 11, 2003. If you have -any questions you may contact me at
477-7200.
Attachment: Final Plat
cc: Ken Tupper, 122 N Raymond, Spokane, WA 99206
Wyatt Engineering, Inc., 1220 N Howard, Spokane, WA 99201
MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHING'fON 99260.0220
PHONE• (509) 477-7200 • FAX (509) 477-2243' • TDD (509) 477-7133
f'
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DIVISION OF PLANNING
DATE: February 25, 2003
TO: Jeff Forry, Building & Code Enforcement
FROM: /?J'ohn Pederson, Planriing Supervisor
/
SUBJE : Proposed Final Plat of Summerfield East 5" Addition, PE-1206-78
Parcel No. 46354.9022
Please mark the attached map with the specific address on each lot in red ink and return it
to me by March 11, 2003.
Thank you
Attachment: Final plat
MAIL STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD: (509) 477-7133
1
1
i
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
A DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPART'IvIENT
DIVISION OF PLANNIIVG
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Assessor's Office; Andrea Sandvik
Dave Berto, Engineers, c/o Sandy Kimball
FROM: Marti Buck
For John Pederson, Planning Supervisor
DATE: February 25, 2003
SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat of Summerfield East 5" Addition, PE-1206-78
Parcel No. 46354.9022
Attached is a copy of the Plat Certificate for the above-referenced proposed final plat.
Please review and forward any comments you may have by March 11, 2003. If you have
any questions you may ca11477-7212.
Thank you.
Attachment: Plat Certificate
MAIL ST'OP PWK-1 • 1116 W BROADWAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHIIVGTON 99260-0220
PHONE: (509) 477-7200 • FAX• (509) 477-2243 • TDD. (509) 477-7133
,
S P O K A N E C O U N T Y
A DIVISION OF TF-IE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
DNISION OF PLANNIIVG
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Treasurer's Office, Ann Leach
FROM: Marti Buck
For John Pederson, Planning Supervisor
DATE: February 25, 2003
SUBJECT: Proposed Final Plat of Summerfield East 5h Addition, PE-1206-78
Parcel No. 46354.9022
Attached is a copy of the Plat Certificate for the above-subject proposed final plat. Please
review it to ensure that it is sufficient for your purposes. If it is not, please let me know.
Also, advise if the taxes have been paid, and if not, the amount due so that the applicant
may be advised. Submit any comments or concerns regarding this certificate by March
11, 2003 .
Please ca11477-7212 if you need further information.
Thank you.
Attachment: Plat Certificate
MAIt STOP PWK-1 • 1116 W. BROADwAY AVENUE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0220
PHONE. (509) 477-7200 • FAX: (509) 477-2243 • TDD. (509) 477-7133
•s~
✓ 1'roject Numbcr 03001020 1 Application Date 2/21/03 Page 1 of 1
THIS IS NOT A PERMiT
Penalties rvill be assessed f'or commencing work without a permit
Proiect In forirration:
Peniiit Use PE-1206-78 19-LOT FINAL PLAT Contact TUPPER, KEN
Address 122 N I2AYMOND, STE 3
C- S-"L SPOKANE WA 99206
Setbacks Pront I,eft Right Rear Phone (509) 217-1052
Group Name•
Site Ijiformation: Project Name SUMMERFIELD STH 4Dll
Plat Key Name "tt~FC~AN~ OUNTY
Parcel Number 46354.9022 Blnck Lot
SiteAddress 0 E ADDRESS UNKNU~V~i RD O~~vner Name FtVE FIFTY, LLC ~G~ ~ 1
SPOKArvE, V1'A IJSA 00000 Address 322 N UMVERSITYI)IVISIUr1 OF F'LANNING
Locat►on SYO SPOKANE, WA 99206
Zoning: UR Urban Reserve
Water Uistrict Hold• ❑
Area .15 Aci•es Width 0 I)epth 0 Right Of Way (ft) 0
Nbr of Bldgs 0 Nbr of Dwellings 0
Review Infornratioti:
Permits:
Loitg Plat
Firm
Pllone
Item Descnntion tJnits Unit Desc Fee Amount
~ ENGINEER k INAL MAP & PLAN 1 SFLECT $100 00
FINAL 19 # OF LOTS $1,052 00
Permit Total Fees: $1,152 00
Notes:
Pavineirt Sumnturv:
Permtt Tvpe Fee Amount [nvoice Amount flmouni F'aid Amount Owine-
Long Plat S1,152 00 $1,152 00 $1,152.00 $0 00
$1,152 00 $1,152 00 $1;152 00 $0 00
Disclaijrier:
Stibmittal of this applicahon certities the owncr (or person(s) authorized b)' the owner) has both eramined and fincis the information
contained within to be true and correct, anci agrees that all provisions of laws and/or regulahons governinK this type of work will be
compliecl with. Subsequent issuance of a permit shall not be construed to be apermit tor, or an approval ot, any violation of any of
the provisions ot the code or of any other state or local laws or ordinances.
Signature:
Opet ator 'MB Pi inted By GNIW Prmt Datc 2/21/03
ZON [NG ANTJ L,AN D USE FEES
~
A RECEIPT INFORMATION
Date: aP-',P,1 File Number- Parcel No.:
Narne: 41 Phone Nuinbcr:
~ ~Campa.ny Name (if applicable): r z
~
Adclress: /c;~a~~ /V- CitylStatelZip:
~
FGE INFQRIVIATION
]tem Ctem (Ynultiplied by (equals)
# L7escriplion Amount # of liems) Tot'll
$
q
$
6,4,~
. ~
TQTAL AMOUNT Q1.pE 57 c- _
~ Transaclian T00 -
y; Receipt
B ~
. ~
WYATT EINC.,
A SUB IA Y OF USKH, INC. ,
To~I~~.~~ -~ckf,n~►~
DATF - ~ .
~ PROJECT NAME ISWM
PROJECT NUMBER LPl
GENTLEMEN:
WE ARE SENDING YOU ~ ATTACHED ❑ UNDER SEPARATE COVER VIA TNE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
❑ SHOP DRAWINGS O PRINTS ❑ PLANS ❑ SAMPLES ❑ SPECIFICATIONS
❑ COPY OF LETTER ❑ CHANGE ORDER ❑
COPIES DATE OR N0. DESCRIPTION ~1 *2 *3
g ~ ~ ~iri Abb
~ x
-1i , . Al)b
(bb
tipOKA~NE COUN -
FFR ? 9 ?M
I
*1- NO EXCEPTIONS NOTED
*2- REVISE 8 RESUBMIT
*3-REJECTED
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED AS CHECKED:
❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ RETURNED FOR CORRECTIONS ❑ SUBMIT COPIES FOR DISTRIBUTION
❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ RESUBMIT COPIES FOR APPROVAL ❑ RETURN CORRECTED PRINTS
14 FOR REVIEW a COMMENT ❑ ❑
❑ FOR BIDS DUE 20 ❑
REMARKS:
IF ENCLOSURES ARE NOT AS NOTED, KINDLY NOTIFY US AT ONCE
COPIES TO SIGNED: t' l
+ 1220 NORTH HOWARD SPOKANE, WA 99201 PH. (509) 328-5139 FAX (509) 328-0423 ,
( ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS • CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS )
Pnntcraft
1 )
TR.PNSNAT ION T Y TLE INSUP-ANCE COMPANY
NoRTH 720 ARGONNE •
5 POKANE , WASHINGTON 99212
Pr2pdreC~ ~or:
Or'der No. : SH- 2 57 9 3$
KJT LLC. Charge : $175.00
AT'TN : KEN TUPPER Tax :$14 . 18
122 AT , RAYMOND -
cc: W~ratt Erigineering, Inc. /~+~iarks - SPD1ANE C~ NTY
p L A T c B R T I F a C A T 9 FE B 2 1 2003
Certificate for filing Plat of : DN1&ON QF PLAhlNlNG
5L]MMERFIELD EAST 5"TH ADDITION
Zn the matter af -the subdivision to be submitted to Spokane Caunty for
approval 1this company has examined the records of Spokane County Auditor' s
and Clerk' s off ices , arad the records of the Clerk of the United States
District Court holding terms in said county. This certificate is made for
the purpo~e herein specified, and is not to be used as a- basis for closing
any transaction. Liabil.ity is limited to the arrrount, if any, paid for this
certificate. Frorn such examination, the company hereby certifies the t~itle
to the ~ol1.owing described land f in said Spokane County, to-wit :
See Legal Description
Page 1 of 4
I
Order No. SH-257938
LEGAL DESCRI PTZON
THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER AND THE SOUTHWFST
QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 26 NORTH, RANGE 44 EAST,
WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
CONIIMENCING AT THg SOUI'I'HWSST CORNER OF LOT 10 , BLOCK 1
SUNIIMERFIFLD FAST ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 9,
SAID POINT BEING A 5/8" 3TSLL PIN FROM WHICH A 5/8" STEBL
PIN AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF PLAT NO. 4 OF WBST FARMS
IRRIGATFD TR.P,CTS ACCORDING TO BOOK "O' OF PLATS, PAGB 51,
BEAts NORTH o° 06102" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2610.05 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0006'02" WEST ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID
PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1121.63 FEET TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 3 OF SAID PLAT AND
THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF
SAID PLAT OF SUMMERFIELD EAST THE FOLLOWING FOUR
COURSES:
NORTH 62 ° 21'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 192.94 FEET;
NORTH 40 ° 31'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 48.01 FEET;
NORTH 65 ° 56'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 128.00 FEET;
SOUTH 46 ° 13'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 114.31 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 5 SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 17 OF PLATS, PAGE 32;
THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FIRST ADDITION THE FOLLOWING TWO COURSES:
NORTH 90 ° 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 469.10 FEET;
NORTH 79035'56" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.17 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 21 SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION
ACCORDING TO BOOK 28 OF PLATS, PAGES 21-22;
THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID
SUMMERFIELD EAST FOURTH ADDITION THE FOLLOWING THREE
COURSES:
NORTH 00 00'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 122.36 FEET;
legal cont.
Page 2 of 4
Order No. SH-257938
legal cont.
NORTH 15025'37" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 39.42 FEET;
NORTH 00 05'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 125.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90°00100" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 159.82 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 71 ° 11'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 98.14 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 87°55106" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 105.37 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 82 °48'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 111.15 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 72 ° 52'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 112.56 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 18.83 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 90000'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 140.52 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 0000'00" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 16.30 FEET;
TNENCE NORTH 90000'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 164.14 FEET, FROM
WHICH THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID WEST FARMS IRRIGATED
TRACTS BEARS NORTH 0006'02" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1083.42 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 0006'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 405.00 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington.
VESTED IN:
FIVE FIFTY, LLC a Washington Limited Liability Company. y,~y~sCir~S . .~0 u~
EXCEPTIONS: ~
1. Taxes,_and -assessmen#s, if any, no search having been made thereof, as to Parcel Nos.
r
46354.9050 and 46353.9074.
-Parcel-Nos. acw-pr-ov' m the latest Assessor s Maps available to the Company. Said
parcel numbers are not a matter of the public record therefor, the Company makes no
assurance as to validity or accuracy relating thereto.
2. Liability to future assessments by Trenfinrood Irrigation District No. 3.
~
Page 3 of 4
Order No. SH-257938
3. Reservations contained in deed, recorded on October 20, 1886 under Recording No. 946, as
follows:
Reserving and excepting from said lands such as are now known, or shall hereafter be
ascertained to contain coal or iron, and also the use of such surface ground as may be
necessary for mining operations; and the right of access to such reserved 'and excepted coal .
and iron lands for the purpose of exploring, developing and working the same.
4. This property may be subject to a charge by Spokane County for sewer construction, referred
to as a Capital Facilities Rate (CFR). This charge is in addition to the monthly charge for sewer
services. Please contact the Division of Utilities Billing Section for information (509) 477-3604.
DATED AS OF January 28, 2003 at 8:00 a.m.
TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
BY
For service on this order call:
(509) 922-2222 (FAX) 926-1519
Sean Heath, Title Officer
ENCLOSURES:
Paragraph 2
Sketch
sc
Page 4 of 4
- \ ~ _ • ,
,04.
;
i- W .
a s~ so si
0
_ . as'r, ~1 6
aa
~ ~ ` • ~ ~1 • ~ -
; \ , z ~s'' • a~
0~, p`t5 s,,? J
P R a .
o1
Cf
~ - e ~ L O~' ~ ~ , / ` ~ ` °A is~i't'i /
U r ~
B • ~ ~
~ 1 9 b ~
S \ ~ ~
3'1 Z
Fo,vncE/L RoAO O
~ - -
'S q ' ' \ • \ ~ N mo ~o 716 .s•
I 1
` 4 -an i r ` , c •~9.s b~
I u ~
0er^. ~J@r~
1 •
t ~ ~ 3 ' • ~ p 3,
i ~ ' y 7.' • ~
L .L - ' • . t
? \ .t
5. ' . I J Q o
.
► ~
~ v~i ( ~ 1 E~D ~ - 31 `c J,~~
W ~ o \ ~o
I t►~'~' ~ j ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ' ' ~ E~ ~ ~ . ` ~jILID
,,1 ix . ,,f'~ c~ . - ~ ~~~c , i ~ . ✓
~ c
vi y ( L`' ~ I ~ ~ • p►pp • • ~ - ~.i; ~r
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ '~iv _ r' . MERf~ qNO~ -~-~~..~s• h
~ 1 ~ ~ - ; . . ~ ~ . *s~ o . 1,~r • ~ ~
_ , - , ~ ,s _ J . . . , ~ , ' ~
. 1 • ' / %
, , f . r• 4 L . , , , t _ ~ ` - . - - .
~ i~c' -+e<•• i~ ~r~» r ' . ~ . _ , , - ~-•w.++ -~,v - ~ ,
- ~ ` - : S'~'' J ` - : ~ ' - • • Y
.i . w ~ ~ 4.; J.. ~-~*wv f,~r , i Yt J ~ " ~ .r . ~ . ,..r- • t~• ; 1 fA ~
. .¢s."~^''n , ' f= ,3' . v . ._,y~ ~ • x _ t ii~~ i t 'k . . , . • C~• ' . t . 6 , , ^ ' y ~ ' +
~p~ ± •1~Y~ ~Y~:- .y+ . ~'~1 ' ~ t t r ~ ^ r, , _ , Y _ - , ~
`•r r ~ ~tF'S'~~ ' : ~ ~j ~ ~ +r`•i_ ~ • ro - i~ . - i~ ~ L +,1
~ a " ` ~~t C~~ ' ~S . ~ ~=c~W-`'r^~'~,~,~•~ r• ~d~" i~ ` ~~Y 1 + j.~T- • i ' ~ . ~ ^ i'~ , ' • ~
t•~'e~ ~ ~i c~~ irs d s" .T rtl ~ - t~~ .S` ry ' .
r ~ 1 hr eL , 1 1.t,~. y,,. 1- ♦ 'i~` E J~ L
..,,,'s.ti~ n..u.> .YLf`«" t<.n ~ ~7<~- ` T e ~"a ~ • . ~ v ~ r . . ♦ ~ , f .n ~ a . _ ~ o
4588714
• _ ~118 j2041 04T 55P
Taa~sWlN T1Tf F 1R (Y1 Im s~e r~ Cnnkat~~ Cn ~a
AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO.
WITHERSPOON, KELLEY, DAVENPORT 8t TOOLE PS
ATIN Stanley R. Schultz
422 W. Riversidc Avenue
1100 U S BANK BLDG.
SPOKANE. WA 99201
2~
COVER SHEET FOR: Statutory Warranty Deed
Grantor: Bruce Butler and Judith A. Butler, husband and wife; May Ann Wilharm; Willard
Hewson and Loretha Hewson, husband and wife; and Kenneth Tupper and Sharon
Tupper, husband and wife
Grantee; Five Fifly, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company
Abbreviated Legal Description: Portion of Section 35, T.26 North, R.44 EWM
Full Legal on Page: 6 and 7
Tax Parcel No: 46354.9022; 46351.9005; 46351.9049; 46352.9052; 46352.9066;
46353.9074; 46354.9050
- ' ~
. 4588714
p~18 j2041 04~ 56P
tAeRuennu t171 c TNC rn m 414 m c►,AkaN r.n R
aFrER REcoRnnvc xETUwN To•
STANLEY R SCHULTL
Withuspoon, Kcllcy, Davcnport & Toolt, P.S.
422 W. Riverside Avenue
1100 U S Hank BuiJding
Spokanc, WA 99201
ST.ATUTORY WAR.R:ANTY DEED
THE GRANTORS, BRUCE B. BUTLER and NDiTH A. BUTLER, Husband and Wife, as to an undivided
fifty percent (50%) interest; and Iv1ARY ANN WILHARM, as her sole and separate property as to a twenty-five percent
(25%) undivided intetest; and W[LLARD A. HEWSON and LORETHA HEWSON, hushand and wife, as to an
undivided one-eighth ('/e) interest; and KENNETH J. TUPPER and SHARON L. TUPPER, husband and wife, as to
an undivided one-eighth ('/e) interest for and in consideration of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable
consideration, conveys and warrants to FIVE FIFTY, LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, the foltowing
described real estate, situated in the County of Spokane, State of Washington, together with all after acquired title of
the GRANTOR(S) therein:
See attached legal description set focth fully in Exhibit "A".
~ SUBJ ECT TO '-s 1) Reservations contained in deed recorded on October 26, 1886 vnder Recording No. 946;
~ 2) Rightto make necessary slopes forcuts or fills as granted by Deed recorded as Document
~
u~ No. 432623;
91= 3) Easement granted to Spokane Valley Land and Water Co. as recorded on May 26, 1911
under Recording No. 324569;
\,%4) Easement granted to the United States of Amecica as recorded on January 19, 1943 under
~
Recording No. 572309A;
5) Easement granted to Trentwaod Irrigation Disd-ict No. 3 as recorded on January 17, 1966
T
: s under Recording No. 171591 C;
6) Easement granted to Inland Power and Light Co. as recorded on June 26, 1978 under
Recording No. 7806260065; and
7) Other Easements, resfictions and reservations of record.
IN WtTNESS Wi-EREUF, this instrument has been executed this _tLj~'day of ~YC:t , 2001.
~
,
'
~ ~RUCE B. BUTLER 1UD A. BUTLER
0
r~
~
~
u
~
~
~
LD
G LSRSITUPPERTrvc FiRy LLG12rd WartnMy DaC wpd
. ~/YL! +'~~t 1~
- Lc~RETHA HE W SON
WILLARD A. HE WSON
MARY N W ILHARM KENNETH J. TUPPER .
7ZfAXaV
1
SHARON L. NPPER
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss.
County of Spokane )
1 certify that I)rnow or have satisfactory evidence that BRUCE B. BUTLER is the individuaI who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me that he signed this inswment, and he acknowledged it as his free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument.
~
DATED this ~ day of 2001.
. ~
( . ~
QAT$/y~O NOTAR PUI~bI AI~p~ ASH GTON
• If/ Residing at ~ _
% ~co ly
N ~ My Aprointrnen Exrires;
o NpTAAy9m;~ ~
% : U N ; ~
STATE OF WASHiNG'TON PLJBUC
County of Spokane t~ pp ~
~ W~ :
1 certify that I lmow or }►ave satisfactory evidence that JUDITH A. BUTLER is the individual who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me that he signed this instrument, and he aclmowledged it as his free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument.
DATED ihis ~ day of ' 12001.
OT Y PU IC AN FOR WASHITtGTON
40
P^TS~ 1 Residing at: .•`S510iy''•MY ~+PPointrne t Expires; rJ 'f "L~~
N ~
I
STATE OF WASHINf'iTON ; V~0 T~y ~ i
i ;)3S. ~
~ ;
County of Spokane f'UBLIC
N 1>.13~pA
~ ~
~ ~
G lSRS17't1PPER1f'rve P'+tiy L1.C12nd Wetinnty Deed wpd
4588714
P18I2041 o 04,55P
TAANSWItif1N T1T1 F TNS (Yi Wf1 4i0 M Snnkana Cn wd
4588714
~18r2001 o04:5bP
TRINSWQTiflll TT11 F 19 (Y1 In 4Io m SnnkaM Cn IU
I certifythat I know or have satisfactory evidence that Wa,LARD A. HEWSON is the individual who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me that he signed this instrument, and he acknowledged it as his free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instrument.
DATED this 10 day of 2001.
e~`/ Y~'✓`~ q.•~~V~/ V~ ~~L. 111/ 1 I
NOTARY AdBLIC iN AND F W SHiNG T 'bd~.
, QN•• ~ J~'•
Residing at: ~ d
My Appointment Expires; S~ 2U -ZQ~)~, : M~',,~ ~ o va' :Wc
~c ' sa
STATE OF WASHJNGTON ) ~ . ~s
)SS- s~it►~~~•',k
.
County of Spokane
''~r~i~~►rc.~1LMh
l certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that LORETHA HEWSON is the individual who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me that he signed this instrument, and he acknowledged it as his free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purpases mentioned in this insdvment.
DATED this `U day of Pa,,r,2001.
NOTARY A LI IN AND FO WA H1NGTRN ~
Residing at: ~ LQ-~'l~~ ~Jl~~~ ~'~s•
~.v►s
My Appointme t Expires;
.
.J`
- 0 , v, ' 'lp,
STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ' P
. ,
)ss.
) - 1 ? ~
County of Spokane
,~j~
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that MARY ANN WILHARM is the individual who "
appeazed before me, and said individual acknowledged to me thzt he signed this instrument, and he acknowledged it
as his free and voluntary act, foj the uses and purposES mentioned in this insvument
DATED this 7 aay of , 2001
.
.•`,~~~Q:~ s~ ~ ~C•, ~•i VA ~B II~A FOR W ASHTNGTON
N° TAR y Residing at:
ires; ? L~C~ 3
; ~ Y APPointme t Ex P
PU8L1C M
. . p
~ 9 ~•.O~
14,
ASVNN
WASHINGTON'V~/• V W
STATE OF i1t>,;~%
County of Spokane )
i certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that KENNETH J. TUPPER is the individual who appeared
before me, and said individual acknowledged to me that he signed this instrument, and he acknowledged it as his free
and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes mentioned in this instnirnent.
G 15RS1TUPPER\F" Frfly LLC12nd Wura¢ty Decd wp0
. . 4588714
6118J20Q1 o
0 04;55P
TRINCNdTTf1N TTTI F TNS fY1 tY11 S,id f1t1 Snnkana Cn 1Y8
DA~~~~~ day of 2001.
~ Q•~ ~~~y~'~~~
Z
NOTqRy N~ NO RY PUBL ~ TN ANDiFOR~VASHINGTON
.
" • - Re3iding ar ~~IA
.
ftBLtC My Appointment Expires;
ii~~►~.,~ }s
.
STAT~~ ` ~
)ss. .
County of Spokane
A
I certify Ehat I know or have satisfactory evidence thaf SHARON L. TUPPER is the individual who appeared
before rne, and said individual aclmowledged to me that she signed this insmiment, and she acknowledged it as her free
and voluntary act, for the uses and puTposes mentioned in this instrument.
DATED this day of 2001.
~ .
t ~
`z~ , WU k'( ~ r~
A1,N'000E; ~'~i N ARY PU$L C IN AI~'D FOR W`ASHGTON
.
Q` ssa~~•!! ~
` s.• ~,oy~'~y ~ Residing at: A
NorpR + tJ~ ~ My Appointrnent Expires; ~
.
r
pU8l1C
• . ~
.
.
'o
.
.
0 \SR%NPDER1Frvc Ftfly [.LMnd Wuronty Dcod w➢d
• 4588714 -
~ , .
P06~1812401 44155P • ~ .
tRdNS#YIT(IN TTT! F 1NS (X1 wn sia m saAa". rA wi ~E
LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0
A portion of Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44
East, W.M., more particularly described as follows:
BE6INNING at the South quarter corner of Section 35;
thence South 89052100" West, 350.00 feet; thence North
30.00 feet to the True Point of eeginning, also common -
with the Southwest corner of the Trentwood Elementary
School Tract; thence South 89052100" West 311.10 feet;
thence North 0005138" West 2610.08 feet along the East
boundary of WEST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS to a point of the
East-West centerline of Section 35; thence South
89053143" West 1327.40 feet along the East-West
centerline of Section 35; thence North 0006117" West 9.51 ~
f eet to a point of cuzve on the Southerly right of way of
Forker Road; thence along the arc of a 1401.87 foot
radius curve to the right a distance of 172.23 feet
through a Delta Angle of 71002' 20" , thence South 89042' 41"
East 489.07 feet; thence along the arc of a 507.66 foot
radius curve to the left a distance of 270.59 feet; :
through a Delta Angle of 30032121"; thence North
59044159" East 526.59 feet; thence along the arc of a
2894.77 foot radius curve to the left a distance of
630.55 feet through a Delta Angle of 12028'57"; thence
North 47016'02" East 2.72 feet; thence along the arc of
a 794.00 foot radius curve to the left a distance of
63 . 12 feet through a Delta Angle of 4033' 18" to interaect
the Southerly right of way of Progress Road; thence along
the Southerly and Westerly Right of Way of Progresa Road
South 7 5° 12' S2 " East 677.20 f eet ; thence along the arc of
a 182.29 foot radius curve to the right a distance of
124.88 feet through a Delta An91e of 39015104"; thence
South 3505714811 East 948 . 32 feet; thence along the arc of
a 288.38 f oot radius curve to the right a di stance of
183.13 feet through a Delta Angle of 36023107"; thence
South 0025119" West 2298.29 feet to a point on the
Northerly right of way of Welleeley Avenue; thence along
the North right of way of Wellesley Avenue North
89056'40" West 935.42 feet to a point common with the
southeast corner of the Trentwood Elementary School
Tract; thence North 903.42 feet along the East boundary
of school tract; thence West 700.00 feet along the North
boundary of school tract; thence South 903.89 feet along
the West boundary of school tract to the True Point of
eeginning;
(legal description continued)
, . ,
-
4588714
Page: TofT
0511812001 44;55P
jAbNSUTTAN. tiTl F TILq fY1 Ylt1 414.(X) Seekane f.e. Yu '
LEGAL DESCRI PTION ( cont . ) :
EXCEPT a parcel of Iand in the North one-half of said
Section 35, Township 26 North, Range 44 East, W.M., =
particularly described as follows: -
BEGZNNING at a point on the East-West centerline of Section
35, that is North 89053042" East, a distance of 1412.87 feet
from the west quarter corner of Section 35; thence continuing
North 89053142" EasC, a diatance oF 60.00 feet; thence North
13050' S6" West, a distance of 38.91 feet to a point on the
Southerly right of way of Forker Road; thence along the
Southezly right of way of Forker Road, along the arc of a
507.66 f oot radius curve to the right, a di st ance of 58.31
feet, through a Delta Angle of 6034' S3", the long chord of
which bears South 76009102" West, a distance of 58.28 feet;
thence South 13050156" East, a distance of 24.66 feet to the
Point of Beginning;
AND EXCEPT Platted Portions;
,
.
AND EXCEPT any portion of the Northeast quarter of the
Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter Iying Southerly and
Easterly of Forker Road;
Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washin9ton.
mm oS scmmtng pAll
*ifif*~tfi~:s:f,r~,~,~~es~t#~fw~~rs~*,rft*i~tst*itiiwit~rt:~*t~r,~~►~
THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS PROVIDED FOR CONVENIENCE ONLY:
(Parcel Nos. 46354.9022, 46351.9005, 46351.9049, 46352.9052,
46352.9066, 46353.9074 and 46354.9450)
iPtn. 35-26-44)
- ~ t a; ' ~s ~ E' a ~ S ~ i
~ , • n ,
~ „ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ 8
I, •4`~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~~i ' ~ ~ ~ ~~y ~ ~
;A
•I'4 ~ ~ ~
A .5
• ~ ~..L ~ i 4 ) ~ ~ ~ ! ~
w
+ + 1
` ~q ~ D ~ ~ ~
' , r ` ~ • ~1t ~ ~ ~ m S
~{y ■ i~~' 0 a `
l
Cc r
ti
_ y.~ ~ 1 r ~ • V w~r'
~p N11 r~ ~ ~
JI~~~l ~b$
, , • ' • 4i~~.~~x~i~*~ ~z~
w-- .
, ~ ~.3•Ti~Ti~ ' l 'Jr~~ SS ~i ~ ~~~4 a~ ~
. ~ ~
~Ii
> • ~i ~ ~ '3
sJI
1 I I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , 1 ~ ~ y fi ~ s
~ ~ ~ ~ ~s ~ :b~ ~ 's 1 ~ ~ i
. , ~ ~ ~ ; ~ , . , ~ ~ . ~ ~
' ~ i~ ~ ; ~ ~ d x E ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ; F
' , ' ~ ..f 1 ~ ~ ' ~ y ~
~";`~=~:~`y: • t ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ jiY ~ ~ ~ ~~1 ~ ~t ~
Li~~ I
` Y ;~,::~-~A~Y _ ~ ~ s ~~~i~ ~s , t'`~~~ ° c , ~ ~~~t~~i IL~
~I
, aa„~; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ 7, ~ { ~ ~ J,
" s 1s ~
41~
•V~
41
• . v ~b. ~ a Ji
• ~j ~l~ . - ~ 1~,~ ~1 ,
, ; ~ ~ t~
3 ~ b 1~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ ' ` ~
~ . . r~ _ .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ • ~ i ~ ~ ~ '
a qi
d
~
4 PUBLIG WATEY, TFgKE MAY IXI57 PRaPERTIES LOGATED Lf'HILL AND kWALFNf TO ?HIS iHE Pt,~LIG WA7FR STSTEM AS AP~ROVEO BT GOUMY MID S7ATE F~1l.TH AU111QR~T~ES SI.~IYI510N 7HAT PERIOOIWiLI.Y DISGFiI~RGE STORMWA7ER Rld10fF 0!~lf0
oEU.~w,riora nrr~ oFOic~r~av 7HE LOGAL FIRE 015TRIGT Md~ WATER PI.P.VETOR, SFi~l1 BE INSTALLED WITHIN 1H15 PLAT, ~~~VIOUAI. L015 WIIHIN THIS PI.AT STQRMWATQt RUJOfF FROM IEARBY I,PHILL AM~ iNE SUBOIVIOER WILL PPOVIDE FOR fN01V10lJAL D0~511L WA1ER SfRVIGE A5 WELI. ~~~IES SHOU.D 6E EXPEGTEO, AND OURING SNOW M0.7 PERI005 OP, WET
KNOW N.L THESE IEN 9Y THESE PP.ESEMS TINT KJT fNVESTAENIS LLG, HAS PI~ITTED AS FIRE PROiELTION 70 F~IUi LOT PRIOR 70 SAL£ OF EALI{ ~01 ~ ~OTS MAY 8E SUH,~EGTED TO NIGHER AMOLNTS OF 5i0RMWATER fNTO LD?5 N~ 51REE?5 iFf I.MD SHOWN FE~EEON i0 BE KNOWN ti5 SU~IERFIELD Ei15T RIAlOFF' TFbW WHAT f5 N~RMALLY 099ERVt7~ OY. ANTfLIPA~ 6EC,AUSE FIFTH ADDlTION SAID UM~ OEING DESLRIBED AS FOLLOWS+ 115E OF PRIVA?f WELLS AND WATFp SY51EM5 IS PROHlDITED STORlAWA7ER RUNOFF FROM ADJALEM PROPERTIFS HAVE OISLFURGFD ONfO 1H15
Pur PRIOK ro oEVEl.oPf~Kf, 570RMWATFR RUdOfF WILl. UKELT GONTIMIE ~0 All~l?OP,'S GER7IFIGAfE THAT PORTION OF iHE SOUTF~.AST QUARTE7, A1D 7F£ SOUTffWEST p1NCTFJt OF SEGTION S FLOW hNZAK~ AREA PO 50 AFTER OEVFlOPMENI ~IC.ATF_ ~
35, 10WNSMIP 16 NORTFi RANf£ 44 EAST WII.LhMEtiE MFRfOIAN OESGRIbE~ AS FOLLOIVS~ TFi REGlA.A110N5 OF TFE MA710NN. FLOOD IM51NtAA'!.~ PROGRAM SHALL BE 095ERVEU FlLED fOP. REGOP.~ THIS ~AY 51NGE THE PRA°OSFO %.hT IS AFFELTED BY A FLOCD HAZAP,p ZOl~. A OEVfl.OPIIE?!T TFIE OEVELOPEP,. PROPF~TY OWl~EY.S. MD Fi0AE0VREP.S ASSOGIATION WAIVE ANT Of ,?J_. A7 Al LOlMIENGIN6 AT TIE SOVITHWEST GORNER Of LOT 10 BLOLK f StA~RfIEID EA51 PF3,MIT SHALL 9E OBTAINED FROM ThL GI?Y OF SPOKNrE YALI.EY ENGI7~ER 9EFORE APID ALL GLAIYS FOR ~AMAGFS A6AIk5T ANY fiOVERFdf.NTAL AUTFIORIIY ARISING IN DOOK _ OF Pl.ATS AT PA6E _ r &r vA r.c
AGGOROIN6 TO DOOK 17 0F PLATS, PAGE 9. SAfD POINf BEING A S/6' S7EEL PIN FRO~N GONSTRULTION OR OFVELOPMENi BEGIMS WITHfN AM' N.EA OF SPEGIAL Fl.000 HhZARD FROM TFf GakNRUGTION OWNEP.SHIP OR MAINTFJLWGE OF PUBLIG fAGILITIES Ai Tlf REQI~ST Gt~ KEN TIPPFR WMILH A 5/8' STEEL PIN A~ fi~ MORiFEAST GORI~R OF PLAT NO A OF YIEST FARAtS ~~~~TED SPOXAI~ GOIAYTT ORDINANGE 68-0511 THIS LONDITION IS AL50 THIS WAIVFR INLLi1DE5 Ll.AIMS Of MI1' NATI.RE, INLLUDING BUT N07 LIMITED 10 N 7R BTL?MX
IRRIGATED TRAGfS ALGORDIN6 70 BOOK 0' OF PI.ATS, PAI~ Sl DEAJtS NORTH U'Obb~' ~ILABI.F TO OP,IVEWAY APPROAGFfS. OP.IVEWAYS AND PRIVATE ROADS GON5IKUGTEO PERSON M~ REAL PROPER7T OAMAGES AS WELL AS ANY INVEP.SE LOkDE1RlAifON WEST A OISTAMGE OF 261005 fEET~ ON TF~ SI7E FOR ALGE55 (,U~MS SPW.ME GOUJTI' AIAITOR BT OFPUIY Y DFPUTY
C ~ 'f1fJiLF NORTH 0'Obb2' 1YE5T AV iFf WESTERLT LII~ OF SAfO PI.At OF S1,A11~Rf1Q~
~ EAST, A OISTMIGF OF I@L63 FEET 70 1}E MOI.'fFM'E57 fARf~R OF LOi l BLOLK J pF 6~IUTY F.ASfMFNfS ~ UTILITY EASEh~NTS SFI~WN ON THE 1~RE~N DESGRIDED PLA1 ARE FfRE9Y OEDIGATf~ SfIRVEYOR'S LER?IFILATE ~ SAID PLA1 MID iFf POINi OF BE6lfNING+ TO TF~ UTILITY GOMPANIES WHIGH HOlD A FRAML1115E GRANTFD BY TFE LITY OF SPOC.M~ -rCArE
VALLEY OR 01F~R GOVERI~JJiAL ENfITT Ahb ARE LIMITF~ TO 1HOSE 115E5 GONSlSTEMT iH15 NAP GORRELiLY RfPRE5EM5 A 5l,RVFY TFENGF NORTIf_ASTFRf.Y ON THE NORiMERLT DOIR~NtY OF SAID PLAT OF SIR~AfRF10.D yy~~{ 7}~ (,~ySTRULTIOh( RfGOMSTRUG110N, f/.01EL710M IAAINIENANGE Af~ OPEI.A'ffON OF W10E BT ~ OR U`OFR AIT DIREG1~flfJ IN F~15T 1HE FOLLOWlN6 FaUR GOURSES~ SAID VifLITIES INGLUOING GAS, 4.EGTRIGITY, TELEPIIODE Al~'D LABLE, TOGEThFl WITH T}£ LOPFORfIAMLE WI1M TFE REpU1RElENTS OF iF
iti IN WI1PE55 N?LP.EOF. Tlf FOLLOWING OWIfiR H45 IfRaA1T0 SEt HIS WIND LITY Cf SIQKME VALLEY SUBOIYIiIOh ORDIN ~ kOR1H 67~f0~ f~157, A DISTANLE Of 11294 FEE1 RIGHT 10 IMSPELi SAID UTILITIES AM~ TO TRfM M~/OR RpdpyE ORUSH Ah~D TREES m~5 ~AY OF 200_. WHIGH MAY II~fERfERE WiTN THE GOMS?RUG110N, MAIMENMIGE MD OPERAIIA'J OF SME P.EpU1REFEMi5 OF 7}f y us+n~v~arrY irniueuic i~
t~ NORTH 40'Jf59' F~15T A OISTANGE OF 48AI FEEl~ ~1'A TO(~TFER WIiH 7}~ RIGFfT TD AGGE55 SAIO UTIU7Y EASEfFldfS T}~OUl~H MIY BOR0.R EASfJdENT SHONTI HERFON STR~T LI6Hf POLES TP.F~ AI~ 6RIGIC. ROGK OR
NORTM 65'S6'49' EAST A ~157A1dLE OF 118.00 FEEP ~~Y STRUGTlJRES ARE PROH1811E0 WI1H1N THE ~lFOREa£MIOMIED UTILITY STRIP, U~LE55 KpV J 7UPPER fNSTALLED 9Y SERVIN6 UTlLI1Y MANAGIN6 PARINFR
~ SOUTH 46'u'?4' F~lST A 0151MGE OF 114,3i FEET TO TFE MORTHWEST GORNER OF KJT INVESTMINTS LLG LO? I, BLOLK 5 SIA~4~RFIELD EAST FIRST AO~IfION AGGOI.DINb TO BOOK p OF 7 BORD~R EASEAtENTS AGKfJ~N4.F1~G~ENT
~ Pl.ATS PhGE 37~ THE BORDER EASfA4EN'f AS SHOWN HEREON ARE fiFREBY 6RAMTED TO TFIE GITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AMD 175 AUTHORIZED A6ENT5, M10 TO 7fiE PUBLIG FOR 51A7E OF WA5HIN670N 1 SARA MAItKS, PLS 27%I ~ TFEMGE EASTERLY AV T}f NCf.iHERLY DOUhDM,Y OF SAID SUFY~RFI0.0 EAST FIRST ROAD PURPOSES INGLWING BIPf NOT LIM17E0 TO GIM85, SI~EWALKS, ~ 35
AODITIOVl 1Fffi FOLLdWfN6 TWO GOLRSES~ ORAINAGE, SIGNAGE AMD OTHER USAGE DEEIdED NEGESSARY BY 7HE GITY OF ~tY ~
NOKTH 90'00'00' EAST. A ~ISTMlGE OF 464p fEET+ SPOKANE VALLEY ENGINEER FOR TFiE SAFETY AND WQ.FARE OF 7HE PUDLIG MO FENGE OR POR710N 'fF1~RE0F WILL BE GON57RUGTEO WITHIN SAID GITY OF SPOKMi~ 4Al.I~Y UTY F.NfiINEER ` EASEMENT WI7FIOUT PERMISSION OF THE SAlD LI7Y OF SPOKMIE VALLEY TNIS ~AT OF 200_ DffOP.E ThIE pr/~,1I1~Ep I,~ ppP?OVFD iHtS _ DAY ` NORTH 743556' EA51 A OISTANGE OF 10n FEET TO TFE SOUiMHE51 GORIffR OF ENGINEflt NOR WILL MIY O6,lEGTS 0F PLAGE~ IN SAID EASEMEM THAT WOULD ~RSIGI~O A NOTM.Y PUB~(.IG IN Ald~ FOR THE SiATE OF WASHIhC+70N OULI' pc pp_, EY GI7Y ENGtNEER
`f f.0A0AI5510f~D Ak~ SWORN PFRSOVULLY APPEAREO KFl~I J 1UPPQt 70 A~ LOT I, 6LOGK 71 5Uk~1£RFIFl.O F~IST FOUtTH AOOITION ALGORDING TO BQ~K T8 OB57RUGT THE SIGriT OISTANGE NEGE55ARY FOR SAFE AA'a EFFIGIEN'f KNOWN TO BE Tlf MANAGlNfi PM.TNER OF KJT INVESTAENTS, L1.G, A UMITFD " OF PiATS PAGES ~I-2?+ VEHIGU.AR MOVEMENT MfY 07HER EASEMENTS 6RANTED OR OfDIGATED WfTHIM > THtS _ DAY
7 7HI5 BORDER EASEMEMT AREA WILL BE SU80RDINA7E TD TFIE RIGHTS GREA7F1~ LIA8ILITT LOMPANY, 7HE LOAPMfY THA1 EXEGU7E~ iHE FOREGOING GITI' OF SPOKME VALI.E1' GIiY F1WfI~EER L~ TF~NGE NORTIfRLY ON iHE WE5Tf1tI.Y DOIA~EDART OF SA10 SW~1fRFIELO EAS'f FOI.RtH BY 1Ht5 EASENF.PIT AMD ARE SI.~EG7 TO TF~ GITY OF SPOKMlE VALtEY fN5TRU1~Nf M17 AGKNOWI~fNiEO THE SAID INSTRUMENT TO 9E 1}f FREF MD s i in cw.Luncr
Q AODITION 1HE FQl.LOWING THREE GWRSES~ ENGINE'~RS PERMIT PRQLE55 PRIOR TO USAGE. vT}EREIN~MENTIONFD, ~ 0 OA1H~~ST~ED THA7 F~ 1~5 AUT}fOR ~ OPOSES GI1T OF SPCKAI~ VALLE7 DEPARTMfM ' fXEGUTE TFE SAID INSTRLP~NT O F G O h W a A V I T Y O F V E L O P i~ f N 1 ~ N O R T N 0' 0 0' 0 0' E A 5 7 A O I S T M I G E O F t 1 2 J 6 f F~ T~ EXA~AIIED MD A P P R O V E D TH15 _ DAT E7 OEPARTMEN'f
8~~~~ WIiT~55 MY HAM7 ME) OFFJUAL SEN. AFFIXED TFE DAT AND TEA2 FIRST ~ IJORTH bZ5'Jt WE51, A DISTANGE Of 3`l47 FEET Tf~ PROPFRTY OWNERI5) WITHIN 1HI5 Pl.AT SHN.L BE HELD RE5PON5191E FOR KEL~PING Et0PMEN7
~ OPQ~f AND WINTAINING TF~ EXI5TIN6 SURFAGE PATH Of NA11/RAL OR MAN-MADE WRITTEN NOR7H Ob5'00' WESi, A DISTAPIG~ OF 12514 FEET DRAINAGE LOURSES OVER MD AGRO55 TFEIP, P,ESPELTfVE PPOPERTIES TFE PROPET.TY DIREGIOR, UTY OF SPfJKMf YALLEY > mn _ oAr
OWNERf51 WI7HIN THIS PLAT 511ALL 9E RE5PON5lBLE FOP. Rf1AIP,, RE510RATION, AN~ qFpAPi~M pF LO~M~Ty pEyQq'~M ~ iF~fJ~fGE MaRTH 90'0000' WEST. A OfSTANGE d~ 15482 FEE~+ PfRPE1UAL MAINTEMAMGE OF bI011~RTRATION (~081 SWALES MD ORAINAGE 017UiE5 SfTUATED ON 7}~IR RESPEGTIVE PROPfP.TIES WlTHIN BORDER EASEAENiS OR ANY PORTION SPOKtiNE REGIONAI. HEALTH 015TRIGT
ThFJJ~~LLE SOUTH 7f111?' WEST. A 015TANGE OF 98l4 FEET 51?UA7f~ IN A PU9LIG IIGHi-OF-WAY ADJALQVf TO TMEIP. RESPEGTlVE PROPER7fE5 ~ MAINfENANGE OF OP.hINAGE FAULI11E5 INGLLOES, BUT f5 NOT LIMITED T0, KEEPING OPFaf EXMIIMED AfVD APPROYEO ~Ff15 _ DAY
~ TFfFJ~GE NORTH BTSS'O6' WEST, A DISTANLE OF 105.~7 F~T~ AJ~ GLEMIING BfOfNFILTRATIO'N (~061 SWALES, PIPES LATGFbA51M5, MD LULVERTS~ ANO NOTARY SEAL~ ~ THE RFPAIR, RE570RA710M M1D REPI.AGEI~NT OF ORAINA(~E STOULTlAtES/FAGRI7IE5 AS ;r ThFNGE NOY.TH 67480?' WE57, A DISTANLE OF lllb FEE~ NEEDfD MAINiENANGE OF DIOflrFIL7P.~110N fx18} SW,ILES INGLIA7E5 BUi f5 N07 N07ARY PUBLIG IN MfD FOR ThiL STATE aF WASHING70N ppR ~~y,~ ~~~jr~ Irr oev4orker
Q LIMITED TO MAINTAINJNG PFRMANFM 6ROUPlD (AVEP. O.IVE. NA71VE-TYPE DRT LAND ~ TFENGE MORTH 7~51b0' V/E57 A OISiANGE OF l12.S6 fEET~ GRASSFS OR LAWN 1URF, WI1H OPTIONAL SFKUB9FP,Y AND/OR TRE~S WHIGH DO NOi R@SIDlNfi A7 LTH L')I5TP.IG7 > 7HI5 OAY
r'; OBSTRULT THE FLOW AND PERGOLATION OF STORM ORAINAGE WATER IN TFi SPaCAf+~ GOUNiT ASSE550R i~., TF~NLE SOUTH 000'00' EA51, A DISTANLE OF 188J FEET+ BIOIM1FILTP.ATION fZ08) SWN..E A5 ff~d~IGATED 6Y THE APPROYFD PLANS~ ON ALL MY APPOINTME1Jt FXPIRES~ p(AylffD ND APPROVF~ THJS _ DAT
TFlFIJGE NQRiH 4600'00' NEST, A DlSTMILE OF 14051 FFFf~ BIOIPFILTRATION (108) SWALES RF.MOVIMG MID DISPOSING O~F 1FE SOIL Al~ GROUND ~ ~r GOVIX IN 9101NFILTRATIAV (ZOBI SWAl.ES AT SUGN TII~ TFE GI7Y Of SPOKANE ViU1.EY Wu.ni oFFieae
0.EM5 NEGE55~RY AMD REPLAGINfi TFdE 501L AND GROIA~ GOVER NO STRUGTURES L TF~NLE NORTH 0'00'00' E15T A DI5IANGE OF 16.30 FEET fNLLG0ING FENGES SMALL BE GONSTRUGTFD OIREGTLY OVFp OP, WITMIN A ORhfNAGE SPOKM@ GOUITY ASSESSOI. BT OQViY r~ FAGILItt WIT1i0UT THE EXfRE55F~ WP.ITtFJI GA45FNi OF TFE LITY OF SPOKAhE YALLEY SOR
N 7FfNGE NORTM 9000~0~' WE51 A DISTANLE OF Ib4 W FEET FROM WH1GH i}IE M1'OP.TFl~r15T ~I~ ` LORAfR OF SAID WESi FARMS IRRI6A'f~D 7RAGT5 OEARS MOR7M 006'04' WEST A SPOKANE GOUNfY OIVISIaN OF UfILITIES 111J5 _ DAY
IXAVII~D MdJ APPROYFD 7HI5 _ DAY 0'~ 015TAMLE OF IOB341 FEET~ If TFIE PROPERTY QW1~RI51 Fhll 70 MAINTAIN Tlf SURF/IGF PhiH OF NA7URAL OR ` THFJPLE SOUTH 0'O6'0? EAST, A 0151AMGE OF 405.00 FEET TO TFE POINT Q~ BE6INNING~ '~N-111A0E ORAINA6f FLOW, OR ORAINA6E FALILI71E5 ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES A ka71GE a` s~; _
N OF SIX.li FAJl.f.RE IAAY 6E GIVEN TO TFL PROPERTY OWNER151 IF NOT fARRELTED ~ GONfA1NfNG 578 AGRES, MORE OR 4.~55 WITHIN THE PFRIOD INDIGATED AN SAID M071GE. 7HE UTY OF SPOKANE VALLET HAS Thf OIVfSfON OF UTfLI7fE5 6WtAGEY, ~IGNi 10 GORREGI 1HE MAINTENM'LE FAfLUR~, OR HAVE IT (ARRELTED, AT TME
SIIUAIED IN SPOxME GOl,WTT, WASHINGTON, ~~~~rY OW~I.ISL 7}E PROYf.RTY OWNERI51 SHN-L 9F RESPOfJiIBV.E SPOKANE GOIN~TY TREASURER FOR PAYMENT OF A!1 U.AfMS MD OTHER LIAOILITIES THAT MAY BEGAME OUE FOR 5AI0 IdN OF UTILITIES ) nHis _ DAr
' lMIMENhNLF RESPONSIBILITIES 1 DO IfP.f$T LFRTIFY TliAi ALl. TANES WNlL „ HAY@ B~ LEYIED MD BEGOA~ GMARGF~191E , A{~AIMST iFE LMD SHOWN WIIMIN 1Hf5 N4P
_ TF~ LITY OF SPOKM~ VALLEY SHALL BE RESPONSI6LE FOP. Il~IS,°EGTIN6 MID MAINTAINING HA1'~ BFEM FU1.Y PAID iH15 _ DAY OPYWFILS WlTN1N 'fF4 PUB3.IG RIGHT-A~-WAT OR BOP~DER EASE1~7T5 THE GITY OF qc xJp_ SPOKAI~ VN.LEY DOES NOf ALGEPi THE RESPONSIBILITY TO INS~EGT OR MAINTAIN 1ANAGFY.
L OP,AIMAGE FALILITIES LQLATED OUTSf~ OF Plr9LIG RI6HT-Of-WAY Ald~ BAfDER ~ ~55FA~NiS F~CC~Pi IN GASES WNERE THE UTY OF SPOKMIE YN.LEY SPEUFIGALLY SPOKMi GAkTY T7,E1~ SURER 1LS Q2.11 imL( I
ASSlRAES TFUT RESPOM5IBILITY IN WP.171Mfi MFITHEP OOES 1FL UTY OF SPOKAl~ VAI.L.EY AGGEP7 MIY LbIbfLI1Y FOR ANY FAILLRE BY TFE PRO?ER7Y OWA~RfSJ TO
~ i PR01'E~LY MAIPlTAfN iUGH MEAS ANY BUILDING TMAT 15 GONSTRUGTED ON A LOT IN THIS PU1T SHALL BE SPT AT SUGH DEGOME GFfAR6FADLE VN WITHIN 7H15 NAP
~ Mf ELEVATION 50 A5 TO PROVfOE POSITIVE ORAINAGE AWAY fROM MlY ORAlNAGE ENiRY POINT t0 ThL 9UILDING (INLLUDfI~Ya BU1 IQOT LI,MItED 10 A WINDOW WELL, A WIN~OW TH15 _ DAY
l STREETS DEOIGA110M5 IbVPKOTELTf1~ BY A WlI~OW WELL. OR A DpORWAY) 5A10 P051TIVE ORAIWIGE SWJ.1. r►~ ru~roRS oo ~ar o~rcnr~ ro r►+~ urr a~ sroK,u~ v~r Fac nmuc use ~~5? OF A MINAA~M SIOPE OF 31 AWAY FROM ?HE BU~LDIN6 FOR A DISTANGE OF AT SPOKA (L IFJiST p FEET FP.OM 'fFfE BdJI1.OIN6 TFE L075 SFf~LL 6F GRADED 50 iliAT EITI~R AI NE VALLEY M
FOP.EVER 3B f00t WIDE STRIPS WITH RETI,RfVS f0 BE KNOWN AS GALVIN P.OAD P,IdJOFF 15 ROIJi'm AWAY FROM TFE BUfIDING MS~ fANJfYEO OVFR 'fhE LOT 70 ~EPARTMENT OF I M!D QlJ~EN AVEM,~ AS RIGHT OF WAY FOR ROAO PURP05E5 AS SHOIMN hiREON, ~~Tl~RN, DRAINAGE SWALE OR APPROVED ~KAINAGE FAULITY, OR B) DRAIMAGE CONIMU
NI7Y DE!lELOPM~NY ~ rMa~c~ on r►~ ~or is oiseos~o oF a~ r►~ ~or iN u+ ~e~ov~ orn~w~,e ~ FALIUiY N.L ORAfkAGE fAGIL111E5 FOR THIS rLAT IkGLUDING ANY '~08' SWALES, 2 SIOE AN9 REAR 7Ai.~ SETBAGKS
SIDE YM.O ANO REAP. YARD SEfBAGKS SNALL 8F OEIEP.MIAL~A A1 THE TIME 6UIL~ING ~ ~N AGGQR~ANGE WITH TFiE APPROYED PLAMS ON FILE A7 TFiE PERMITS AP.E I.EQUE5IFA LPLESS TF~Sf SE'fBALKS ARE SPEGfF1GALlY ORAFTFD ON UTY OF SPOKAAL YN.LEY ENGIf~EER'S OFFIGE. ANY PROP05ED UiANl~ES 70 'Rf
~ THIS FINA1. ~A1 APPROVfD ROAD AlvD DRAINAGE Pi.ANS MVST BE MPROYEO BY iHE LITY OF SPOlCANE ~ vau.Er ~wu~r.s o~icE rr.io~ ro coNSr~ucr~c~ oF snio cwu~,ES FINAL PLAT OF J PUBLIG SEWER SY51EM
A PUBLIG SEWER SYSTEM WILL BE MADE AVAILADLE FOP. 1HE PI.AT, uu~ irn~v~ouw SUMMERFIELO EAST FIFTH A~011 = SERYIGE WILL BE PROVf~ 70 EAGH LOT PRIOP. TO SALF. usF ov irbrvrfluu. SEGT I ON INDEX PE -12U6 - 78
ON-SITE SEWAGE DI5P05AL 5Y57EM5 SIiALI. k01 B£ AViFIDRIZF~ BEfNG A SUBDIV1510N IN A PORTION Of ` SEGTIDN 35, TOWNSNIP 26 NOP.TH,
~ ` RANGE 44 EAST, WILLAMET7E MERIDIAN > .
` SPO~ANE GOUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ F
~n X X ENGlNEERlNG ~ SURVEYING ~ PLANNfNG ~TE s►..~ enni-rin~i ~ O/1PT175A1•'C`
~ V V A SUBS/OlAR' ~^i ~ ~ f 61 r w l{ ~ 26 NOP. TH,
~ ~ J I' E V2 SW V4, W V~ SE V4. WYATT ENGINEER/NG lNC. ~9 SEG 15 T76 N R44 E, WM ~y~d3 7220 N HOWARD ST 101 TIiAlN A rTE MERIDIAN SHINGTON
~ 679J02PLTDWG SPOKANE, WA 90201 LEWISTON, !D ~j ~ ~ ? PHONE (509) J2B•5I?9 PHONE (208J 7~ FAX (509J 92D-04.~ FAX (208) 74E PL41VN/NG • TESTlNG
A SUBS/O/ARY OF
i-R A
FqW 1tEDM WI71GVi GN
ALLFtf AS M M~CREAST GORIF~ CF MT NO 4 OF NESi FARY! IRR18u1TED
TRAGTS h7. GOd( 0 OY n.nrs r,we st
h PP~I.IMINARY STP.EET AOORESSES
(i¢~ I~~ i~ GORREGTED NLMBFRS MlST DE OHTAII~ED FRQA1
N P 'A ~ ~1 ~JP P~ i S GlTY OF SPqUI~ VALL£Y DUPZfN6 11iE DUlLDIId'i Al1aITOR'S GERTIFIGATE 5 y~0 N,t> r p ~ ~x~ir ~oc~ss - ~ d ~ ~ FILFD fOR RELORO TNIS DAY TIFIGATE IIS DAY
Dptl~ 1~ ~ LOT I BLOGK 2~ 5201 N. LALVIN ROAO OF 20~ AT M. . A7 M. TS A7 PAGE _
L'~ I 14506 0~~ tiVE IN DODK OF PLATS A1 PAGE _ Q ~ ~ L01 ~ DLOGK 71 14515 E 0~~ ~1'~ AI TFE RE 5T OF KQI TLPF~R py 0~ 1/ ypS ~ I ~ L07 3 6LOGK 71 14608 E OU~EN AVE EN TLOFER
~ LOT 4 bLOLK 7? 14614 E. 0~ AVE, ' L01 5 6~OLK 22 WA1'1 E(JIkEN AVE. sroKnW couM AuOrrat
Fa.NO ~ut wnNarr LOT 6 DLOGK 27 W706 E OI~EN AVE XOKAIE GOI,NlT AU ~,yr ~r p,y LOT 7 910GK Z4 14712 E Ql~t]d AVE. ~ OF 7RAG1 LOE LOT 8 9LOLK 71 14770 E QL~N AVE. C
~ C C? LOT I 9LOLX SZ7Z N GALVIN ROAD
s ~ wsos vt~v nvE. rv a ~or 2 e~.ocK ~ wsu e v~ nvE
~ 4 LDT J BLOGK 27 146II E. QUEfJV AYE, L01 4 BLOGX 23 146n E. OL~N AVE.
IAT 5 BLOLK 21 k703 E pIkEN AVE. n tAT 6 BLOGK 43 14709 pUEEN AVE
~ L07 7 BLOGK T3 14715 E pV/EEN AVE 'v ` o LOT I BLOGK Z4 Si~ K GALV~N ROAO
~ z L01 9 BLOGK Z4 S10S N GALVIN ROA~ ~ LOT J BLOGK 24 SZII N. GN.VIN ROAD
~ GRAPHIC SCALE ~oT 4 a.ocK aa 5719 hl LALVIN ROAO ° ELEVATIONAL DATUM LE6EN~
Q w o m eo im mo ELEVatI0N5 SHOwN ARE AASED NA4D 88 ' ' ' ' USING A FOUND 'X' ON THE NORTH BOIT OF p A FIRE NYDRANT AT THE NW CORNER OF • FOU\iD V?" RE6AR wITH PLASTIG
U ~ w~~ BURNS ROAD AND OLYMPIC AVE AS SHOWN GAP MhRKEO ~AID~.4E t8091' ~ ON SU~MERFlELD EAST, 41h ADOITION, Lw,E55 NOiED OTHERwISE ~ 1 fnch ~ 6o R OFFSITE FORCE MAIN PLANS, UATED 6 18/01
'14fl3 BAR GRAPF3 6 6 ~iC~9 IAMG ON OWGINAL DRAIBNNG EIEVAiION OP THE BOLT IS 2035 97 INAVD 88) 5E7 5/8' REBAR WITH PLA57fL 6 1 fF NOT b QiCH~S Di IENCSA ON li{I9 8E~8 3C618 ACWRDIXCLT GAP MARKED ~USKN ?2461
`J IN~LE55 N07ED OTF~.CW15E J
n~ p SE a~b45G~ W 5~ t'~'L~ RE7E~G(!~B 5 42461' ~ Ih~LE55 NOTEO OTHERWISE. LS ?2461-
a~ ~8 g Q Q ~R R SET 5~8~ RE3AR WITH PLASTIL
~ ~ ~ T GAP l~ARKED USKH ??961' ~ AT Al.L LOT lARNERS ~
i ~ ; O,~ y ~ BL5 ~F~ON1 YARD,SE7BSLFROM ROAD L~NTERLINE L O 7lE
OR ?5 FROdI PROPERTY LIME ~ ~,y W ~ WHIGHEVER f5 GRPA7~R r,= NT~AL 1NE sf
~ 1, ~g f,P FLMIKING SMIE A5 FRONT 5E7BALK ~ 8 8 ~ltiti p,~ L ~,p p~1 Q 0~1 r►s,e ~ lE 'BAGK
~'~~w ~w' "1g g"+ ~ ~ M'S~ DO ~ P~' RFLORO 1M~ORMATIOM FROM SUMM~RFf_M EP57 ~ s g ~ 'h~~ PL~ o~ ~t~ P 5, r't'~ x r Pa q t»N I I I ItoO rt00 M9~OOOOW 140.57' ~ ~ly ~ M`p00~00'W _ b't82~ hU Q.~~ n,~.t ~ PLAT PER b00 i7 Of PLh 5 GE PFfFI GdST
~r w $ n2~ $~a ~ . rOU ~ ~ ' C Pa~ r/; I I i p .,N `i e0.DO' nna ~ T ~ RELORO l1SFORMAiION FROM Wc"5T FARIdS !RnlGaTED LDT 4 I ~ q wiOE M87 tijj~ ~ ~ TRAG75 f'ER BOOK 0 OF PLATS PAGE 51 r, ~o,o~e ~ i ~i~ ~ vr~uTr ~oa1y nirs• 5~~ Z ^ Q o~ Q ~ ~ w n~TS ' s
I a I e~ptipb0 ~^~ti`+~ ~pT 1 LOT 2 C. SObw qSJr LOT 6 lOT 7 N P3~ R R!NF RMAfI F 'NM' A v $ I I I$ R•10AD 11,190 a} Z~ 1D,D21 ~f ~ 10,011 af W 10,000 of g 1 ..S8o0 ~`PER 000~ 17 0~ PLA~ PAGE ry~ 5 3RD DO
~r, „I se b ~ ~•~l~i as----- ~O S ~ ~ ~~7000 - ~ ~ yj t~ ~ ~~T 5 ~ s ~ ~ F ~ a'~ ~ ~ ~ - s Z o~~ ~ o r ~ ~ o; ~ o r ~ ~ t o,~ s s ~ r ~ 2 3 R 3 7 0 C ~ o' a o m w ~ ~ i ~ ~ 0 1 0, 4 8 o a f ~ ~ I a, a J a a t o / ~ 5 eu~r+r ex~5rr,~ ~ t i !
I~ 0 0 Q e 4 F{` S O' 1~~~` b 8 m~ o p,1 V~ z U wiDE x=~{ ~ q wtoF ~ D A I O 710d~ LJ~.3,7 " ~ ~ . ~ ti ~ ~ ~ ~/O V71LI7Y i! UilLITT ~ I I L a~p~, r: -~~~y,~ z g~ x V EnSP..~+t ~ ensE7Errt O 3 PAGE ?1 .i a ~i
0' ` LOT3 ~ ~ OC $ N ~ ~ ~ ~ . \ O C+`y ~P 10122 ef MO'DObO~ RAOIAIa a C ~~T ~ g~ Z . P~ ~ Q I ~ o - ~•fi~,• - - ~r~ ~ ~ m • Y -~=r- ~
, P ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 06 " ~ ~'70°0p ` ~~vo ~ °'~ai ~ - ' - - fOR SI~NERFIELO EAST MID FIR57 c~ QV/ ~ e v 2 i ? I ~ T ~ , ~.rsr.~o•~ - - - - - - - - - - - - V~ Q`~ <y' ~ji~ ~ ~ r J ) r ~ ~~r ~•~a.~' ' taD 9zqJ EOOD - - eooo - - - - - - - - - I A00l~iIW1~ ORAIFWGE EASEMENI ALAW ~1 \(~J n1' I i ~~a' ~ "''Mrr ~~~~.n~ 0 ~ ,-~i -
~ d ~ i ~ . J - - - - -~~szn , ~'~r.n~ ; R ~ ~ u F~SLH S~OE OF N1. fNfERIOR S~OE AMD ~ o ~w ~ a~ Q - _~~.os '01~~ - ~•8ua ' OUEEN AVE w 8 R~ ~m ~ir~s Tli~SE EASFAdEMS ME NOT ~ A - - N10U~bOW _l,fOr' $ ~ N10170bOt C
; dp~' , p~,~ ~ ~ s~s^x'~0' ~ ~ d,y r~e.jr ~ U- - - U„ - - ti SFfOWN F~RE fOP. PlA"P05E5 OF GLARITY ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ P , R•x~oo---- t---- _ ~ ~ ~0, ~~od ~ ti_ IQUEEN 8 AVE. n ~ ,n + ~L•1f.14 ~z ~ - r ~ ` -
O ~ ~ ~ e ~1~, ~1 T~2fY A WICE ;!S a ` ~ ~ _ ~ e'~7l L•77.7~ "I A417 EJ.11 E.117' N.b t} ~ ~ WI ~ p'~{ • 1 l UffL11Y iW u eCS r. ~ ` ~ ~ ~ 1" _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ q DE ~ ~ ~ v6 J.` ~~EASf.~FJ11 i ♦ ~ ~ ~.DOl - ~ ~ _ _ _ - - 1 - I 11A N ~narT7 ~ -'.1 ~ ~ LOT1 ~ L0T2 - a5 T~ $T ;I.w rn
~ LOT 2 geSFs~xr r 1 u wipE ;o e( ~ 10107 ef,~~ _ u wiDe 13,821,, ~ I ~ ~Q ~ SEGtION INOE, - ~ ~ - - ~ o n n w~oe ti ~ . ~ ~ e~se.~~r ,R o~ as o~s ~s~rr ry _ Al.Z7N~~ )E AND
y W A~ A~ p wIDF A~ U WIUE w C~ O EOaROER 1 P ~1f, ~1 LOT 3 $ n ~ ~ ufiLrcr ~ BAeOER ~ D~wICE 3800 ci1 O ti ~ ' 1 1 ~ s 10.783 ei n LOT 4 ~ LOT S S E~sE~r R~ ~S~nK ~ LOT 8 uri~nr ~ 1 u-AR►n
~ ~ 0 8 .p ~ ~ ir~ 'ts. a a ~ 3 io,z~e or ~ ~g 10473 ~t ~ ~9 5 $ ~ ~o,u~ ,r ~,s~+r ~J G~9 ~ Q y 1 ~•~rb ~ ~ ~ n ~ h LOT 7 Z op O 1 L~ J~~~ 6~ S 1` ~ _e~ ~ 1 'A~• y~ ~9 n LOT B 10,473 el "p S [
~ M N ' 1N' , 5~,,.~0~ t 1 ~ 10~473 sl O v ~Ot D t1b ~A°~ 0 L C „ ~ ~ ` ~ , ~K o ~ , ; Y Y / ` ~ Q ~ ~9 p,~O Z .TION INDEX
\ 1 ~ 'D . ~ ~ ~ vr V ~ c~ ~ ~ i ~e~+ , n,r ~zd ~~r ~.rr ' . SPOKANE VA ~ \ o,ti ~ ~ti,,.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~r- , ~ LLEY X X
2 r~aooao~ 46Y10~ p~~ DEPARTMENT OF ~ ~ gs~ , ~ ~'1435 } COMM NI c~ \ ` U TY DEVELOPMEN'P e us sw va, w uz s~ u I I I
$ LOT 1 ~ \ \ ~ IXI571N5 S' Hi6H 1 ` SEG )S T76 R44 M ~ ~ 1B 699 af ~ 1:K@ t 1 t p W00D FFJlGE ~ y • µ ~
~`C .t'~ a 0 pi ~ ) S a g l-~ p1 T' q~ ''q \~~6Jr ~i~ V V y~ b~S 1.0 L01 t ~ J t~' ~~'q, ~ 4v.dr•~ OS ~ ~ f7f151WG 0 wit~ 1 X X
E,c~ g~ Q r. EPh G~ ° PoiNr F c~ T~' ~A \ p ~ ~ ~~.~n FINAL PLAT OF W ~ 0 , ~E~ pN ~I~ X X
BFGINMING~ ~ ~~L ;~a ~ gF ~t~ SUMMERFIELD EAST FIFTH ADDI' ~ RF f , d•~~u~ ~,r~~ p0 ,1 - ~ ~P~E ~ M Ra,asr h~ P 5 r►~ ~ ~ \ , ~ PE -120b - 78 iW !/4. W V2 SH V4
i y °+.os d• `'"'b6 ~~h ~"f / E- 6EIN6 A 5U6DlVISIDN IN A P N op0'' \ T~,. Te~ss f o PV OR71o C y e,~ b~ o~' i M P+ L S E G T I O N 3 5, T O W N S H I P 2 b N O P. T H, 5. T26 N. R44 E, WM
~ ~ rb`~. ~ ~ ~ O~Y n r ~ RANGE 44 E St, WILLAMETTE MERID1Al
~0 ot ~ ' ~ / SPOKANE GOUNTY WA HING70N ` ~e' r $ ~ 3 / . 5 ~ N'fT~ifpJf LN A~ ~ ~ \ - - - - / )F = TH ADDI T I ON
V'i SRlfNWtST GORtER x ` 0`~ ENGINEEAING • SURV@YfNG ~ pLANNING • T OF LOT 10. DLOC.~ I ~ V I MSI.YFJtFtF1.0 ElST~ A PoPrrorv oF
, _ _ SIA,VEY PROLEDlPES BA515 OF OEAItING ASUBSID1Al WELLESLEY AVE 6fitRINGS MID OISiMILES SHOWN BEARINGS ARE BASED OM u~ 26 NOP. TH. "
C~ F¢REON /~E BASED ON A SER~fS TI1E N~7F~RLT UPES OP OF LFEGCED M4EASl~RENFlliS MAOE WI1H SUA4~RFIELD F1~ST THIRD WYATT ENG/NEERlNG !NC_ CU A TRIhBIE 5600 iOiAL 57ATION BT ADOITION ANO SUMMfJefl0.~ ~/~g~03 1?20N HOWAADST 701 THA/N. - ~
lhKFf IPRfVlOI/LY WYAT1) ENGlNEAtIN;~ EAST FIRST NO~ITION FINN. b79J0?PLIDWG SPONANE, WA 9920f t[wisrorv, ❑ ING. IN OECFJ~ER OF 2002 PLAT S~j p pF ~ AHONE f5Q9) a285fa9 PNONE (208) FAX ~509J 728-0423 FAX r20BJ 76 5HINGTON .
• PLANN/NG • TEST/NG
A SUBSID/ARY OF