The URL can be used to link to this page

PE-1204-78 & ZE-94-78 AGMA, June 30, 1978 fELEPHONE N0: 456-2274 ~ SPOr.,AP,F,, COUNTY PLANNIrlG COMMISSION Time: June 30, 1978, (Friday) 1:30 PM, or as soon after as possible Place: Sroadway Centre Bui lc+i ng, Second Floor ~ West 1201 Broadway PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIOPd AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 9. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADJITIO^J ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, a. Location: Section 23, Township 25, Range 44, E.W.M. Approximately 4 Acres of Land on South Sullivan Rd. The South half of Tract 142, Vera, accordinrg to plat recorded in Uoluine "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. Except the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. b. Sponsor: Ken Keto E.13701 Sprague _ Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Surveyor: - Gerald D. Masgai E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 5.5+ acres e. Number of Lots: 16 lots f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning Single Family Residential -i . Water Source: Vera j. School District: Central Valley #356 k. Method of Sewage Disposal Individual on-site systems l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. j_=~ r - , - - - - - ~ St a~r . 'a : N o 19i~ oe .b OO~ ~ ~ ~~o Q 4 T1s.. { 3 ~rr. 6", 6?M •~E ~ • ~ I ~ ,T" 'AGAtvi ~ ~ntno ;:VQllex. _ , o '-P.J;..•..ti:ei~d~:::• . -~CHO ~ : . ~ , ~ I G N T H I►VE . ~ ' • .y , 3 ~ . . - _ r • , ~ ! : ' •i j ~ ~ , , ; ~ ~ •:c:v:. Q , :N: ~:G•H', • _ ..~~Nd'~:, _ ~ •t►, ~ I _ ,o _.t~. - Oh Vo' h M ~ avg • r ~ o T L F I N , v41 W vh p ' ; , ~ U i r ti . e t ~ '~r+ 13 TN a ja Page g m TEENTN :~Tn qVE .c. C 1 C T ~s.il.a1! ►C ' ; C - / . d i : c cev+c Crv'~'t1 . A1<< . _ ~io _ _~M►' .1 AVE ~ • ~ AGENDA, August 25, 1978 TELEPHONE N0. 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION • TIME: Friday, August 26, 1978 - 8:30 A.M. PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor N. 721 Jefferson (at Broadway), Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 6. PE-1204-78 REVIOUS ADDITION (continued from July 28, 1978 Commission hearing) ZE- 94-78 AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN a. Location: Section 23, Township 25N, Range 44 E,W.M, Approximately 4 acres of land on South Sullivan Road. The South half of Tract 142, Vera, according to Plat recorded - in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. EXCEPT the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. - b. Sponsor: Ken Keto _ E. 13701 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Surveyor: Gerald D. Masgai E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 4.63 acres e. Number of Lots: 15 lots f. Proposed Land Use Single Family Dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. Water Source: Vera Water and Power j. School District: Central Ualley #356 k. Method of Sewage Disposal Individual on-site systems l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. . ~ : SP~•~GU~' ~uE ~ Z ~ /6-A hvE ~ ~ : ~ a -6- t ILE DOC04 NT LOG file #pE ~ _ App} i cant Started ~ . pate _ pate Recei,ved ~ IO# oN ~ cUMENT ~D pE~CRIPII l tl --r ~ DO ~ u P-14t ~ . - ~ 1 s ~ ~ ~ - . . ~ ~ L41 ~ ~ -~-Z-Qz ~ o~ ! ~ ~ r~ ~ ti ~ , ~ . y J-7- I 31 Y~2a~` ~9p ry 1 _ qa), s ~ ~ , 17 6~ P~ _7e P ~ti~✓ , 7g 7- • ` 2- 1 . • 2~ r~~ ~✓1 v~-~ d'~, l1- A c~ ac ~ i . ~ ~ Pacific Northwest Bell Spokane County P].anning Cornmisszon North 721 Jefferson Street SpokanE, t'dashington 99260 Dear 5ir: 2'he Utillty easements shown on the final plat of • • are satisfactory to the Pacific Northwest Bel..l. Tclephone Gompan~ . i&:~i ~ G. D. Flem.ing Ra.ah t-of-t'day Agent tiorth 904 Columbus Street Spokane, Washington 99202 cc: Tom Slade \ I ~ tl f \ R E C E I P T Date Received From 'q Address 1 ~701 S~. S;~ ok a-~e r(nf f~ -~.~c 2tb Dollars $-96 • ~ For Q~ F t-c ~ tAd, ks-\Ao"~ ArtcG~ioti,. _ r'a - 12-0 L4 7 g ACCOUNT NOW PAID AMr oF ~CAS" I ~ SPOIiMIE COUNTY P"Uti:~'VG D-'?,'u't:Iv:ENT ACCOUNT I AMT, PAID CHECK BAIANCE ` MONEY ~S DUE ORDER B ~ ( Y ~J 8K806 R•d`tp„" s 1 ti ~ ' • w r No. 79 1088 13EFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ZE_ 94- 78 3 . ) ~ IN THE MATTER OF CHANGING THE ZONING ) R E S O L U T I O N MAP FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY ) RESIDENTIAL ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN ) SECT'ION 23, TOWNSHIP 25, RANGE 44 E.W. M. ) SPOKANE COUN'I'Y4 WASHINGTON. ) The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice of the hear- ing on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning Commission has held a public hearing as required; and that the said Planning Com- mission concurs in the plan to zone the following described property as: SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL , ~ All that area platted a s Revious Addition, located in Section 23, Township 25, Range 44 E.W. M. Spokane County, Washington. PASSED, BY THE BOARD THIS ~b DAY OF , 19 79 . U ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE C OU NTY, VV ASHINGTON VERNON . OHLAND Clerk e Boar RAY By: w JERRy C. KQPET ' . Deputy ~ HARRY M. (,q RNED . This is to certify that this is a true and correct copy of Re solution No. - /,0yl passed by the B oar t s~o /-I day of By : Deputy ZONE CHANGES POSTED ON 2 1ING MAPS Application No. •94" "U Res. No.~ ~JO~Res. Date 7•5~ 79 Fr om : Ar Cr To : ~Fiza , Posted By: ~ - - Date Posted:40 *4079 Acre s: Se c. 23- Two. 25 Ra nge 44 EAST A/A (Wall Map) Buildin9 Codes Department Scale: . 1" - 1000' _ ox (WaII Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' 0 x ((File Map)Mylar - Office Scale: 1" - 1000' OK (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' (File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' ~ (File Map) Metro -411 (Director's Office) Scale: 1' - 2000' ~ (File Ma Count - Front Office Scal : 1" - 1 iI P) Y e m e N*4 (Flle Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST , (Wall Map) Building Codes Jepartment Scale: 1" - 1000' (W a:l Map) Front lff,cP Scale :1 - 1000' (File Maps) Mylar Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Secrion Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 400' _ MIp Map) Tracino 434 (Soc-h East Zoning Maps) Sca1P • - 1000" _ (File Map) Metrc 41 f(Directors Office) Scale : 1" - 2 000' (F. -e Map) Countv-Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile (File Map) Count% (!Vlap Room) Scale: t" - 2 miles , (Score Cards) Mlddle Jffice ~ 1 Noa 79 0380 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, 1rJASHINGTONo ~~-w-1284-78 ) 1 T~ ' 'g 1;,E L R, CdF F ILJ "iH E FIYA L ~ j~"jC 1~i L~..~'" ~~TE~: ~ R E S 0 L U T I 0 N FL: I ~,r 'tCVIC c~ts . IN kCECTICh 23, TOV.NbhIF' 25 N., ~ RANGE 44, L.W,.M.. SF'CKANE CCUNTY~ V~ ASk'IINGTflN ) BE IT RESOLUED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUIVTY, WASHINGTON, that the final plat of REVICtJS ri`C~ EI TIG' ti ~'~r0 tl-- 1/2 of Tract 142, RJcra, according to plat recorded in Voluma "C" of Plats, pa-le 30, tn SpokaRe Caunty, '0 ashlngton except the S 25 feet of the E 321.91 feet* more precisely described in the plat dedication, on the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission, be, and the same hereby is approved, with the exception that the public rights of way ded cated in this plat will not be established for maintenance purposes until the County Engineer has certified that the roads have been improved to County standards and approved by a sep- arate resolution of the Board of County Commissionerso PASSED BY THE BOARD THIS DAY OF , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTONo RAY W. CKR1StENSEN, CNM. NARRY M,~IAR ED ATTEST: VERNON ld,o, OHLAND Clerk the Bo Ay• ~ ~ l'1NAL PLAT CjiL'CK i.IST r } O(L b . i . t'►lidl Niut Leroyua 2. 5uljdivi5jun itajiiu ~ 3. 5uc.tlon, towi►shl~ & railcJc; ~C 9. Sponsor(5) ~iciiiic: (s) ok 5. E„ginder ur surveyor 014 6. Sheet size 29" X 36" . 7. North point, 5ca1C ( l0U' - 1" or 200' - 1") - 8. Boundary Llne 9. Location 6 widths of ProPosed streets, alleYs, ri9hts , of way, easernents, parks, open spaces, & propec labeling oE spaces to be dedicated to the publlc lU . Layout 6 namcs of adjoining subdivisions a. Repldts - Ldyout & Name of the replat shall be shown by dashed lines 11. Streei tidme5 - cui1s15tent with existing streets _ in city diid cuunty. C heck aqainst name s on round ridme wheel. 12.- Lot sizes - l.e., 80' X 125' with 10,000 sQ. tt. for single tamily lot Cul De Sdcs - 80' at buildiiiy line . l.s . Layout, number5, and dinkenstons oE lots 6 parcel s Q~ 14. Necessary enyiiiec:riny dala 15. Does dedlcatlori stdtu lf iriclivldud►1 wcitec anci/or publtc sewers will l,e provldeci in accordance With prellminary plat of approval. lb . Notartzecl certtftcativn by a pr0fess101-1al lanci 3uNeyo[. ~ . 17. Private ce5trlctlans,Lt ally o 18. Nuinbe[' anci tyNo oi units ige 19. Dedtcatlun of stredts to the Nublic oV wr t _r 4k 'lU, E:dsdment veilflcdtion 6 lllustratlon power Qk 21 Check easemtnts, clouds on property, etc . phon . troin Title RuNoit ^ ~ . ; ~ , , ,t _ l _ - - . - .v E . . ! ~ - - ...y Department of Energy Bonneville Power Administration ECEIVED PO. Box 3621 - Portland, Oregon 97208 10 ~ip ; j 19 119 In reply refer to ELMC MAR 21979 SPOKAPlE COUNTY Tract No. VT-129 NLANNING DEPARTMENT Senske & Associates, Inc. 9803 E. Sprague Spokane, Washi ngton- 99206---- • - - Gentlemen: In accordance with your letter of January 10, 1979, this is to inform you that Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) is agreeable to releasing the easement rights it holds on the easterly 10 feet of Tract No. VT-129o We understand that you require this letter of intent in order to proceed with the filing of the Plat of Revious Addition. The easement in question is located in a portion of the NE14-SE14- of Sec- tion 23, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington, between approximate stationings 119+51 and 122+49, of BPA's Vera Tap to Valley Way Tap transmission line right-of-way. Located within the portion of the area to be released is BPA structure 3/4, and it will be necessary for you to provide us with adequate access from Sullivan Road to said structure. Also, although it was not discussed in rrly telephone conversation with Mr. Senske today, we wish to point out that BPA will not be responsible for damage to the curbing which might occur during maintenance of the transmission line. . There is a$100 consideration for the releasing of this easement, which must be paid before issuing this document. Please forward that amount by check or money order, made payable to Bonneville Power Administration, and we will prepare the re]ease of easement across this tract of land. ' Sincerely, Dorothy rl. Monroe, Acting Head Title & Land Management Section Branch of Land / i AFFIDAVIT OF POSTIlVG STA'ITE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) cob F Mc G;^h,',~ , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the 10 t~ day o f Nove rA 4~e i , 1976 , I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspicuous manrier on the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which zs the subject of the ACTION, to-wit, the following locations: 1 A C ~u/c h Pe,l _o4 2. C.~ : 3, I• Co~n. ~i~~i~ y 4. DATID thi s o~-~ day o f Kg YeP% 4ee , 192 °l . rA M n...../1 V SUBSCRIBID a.nd SWCIRN to before me this day of 0d VC o., 4,, , 19 7G? . J~ga ~ Not'ar Public in and tor the State of Washington, residing at Spokane , h{ -b ~ ~ NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE SFOKANE COUNTY Commissioners PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHLPT'ER 43.21 C RCW, NOTICE IS HEREBY GNIIN THAT THE SPOKANE COIINTY Commissioners DID ON October 30, 1978 , TAKE THE ACTION DFSCRIHED BELOW. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTIGN ON THE GROUNDS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH TKE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21 C RCW (STATE IIWIRONMENTAL FOLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMIIdCID ON 12 ~ 15 ~ 78 OR BE BARRID. THE ACTION TAKIIJ BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY Commissioners NO'ITICE OF WHICH IS HEREBY GNIIVg WAS AS FOLLOWS: (1) AP'PROVED ACTION: Revious Addition (2) DESCRIPTION: Preliminary Plat (3) SUCH ACTION PERTAINID TO PR4PERTY COMONLY KNOWN AS AND/OR DESCRIBED AS: Approximately 9th Avenue and Sullivan Rd. (4) PERTINENT DOCUM.ENTS MAY BE EXAMINID DURING NORNfAL COUNTY BUSINESS ~ HOURS AT TI~ SPOKANE CQO'NTY PLANNING DEPARZMIlYT 9 N. 811 JEFF'ERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON. 99201 FxoNE 509 ) 456-2274 NOTICE G NEN BY: Senske & Associates, Inc. FILID BY: iNAME: TSTowSlade^wr TITLE: P~lannerfv . ~ szGrrATURE: Telephone WAlnut 4-3800 . • ~ D►stri6utors of IX✓ater Powor e ~ 3 '.i!. , . k' 601 NdRYH EVERGREEN VE6dADAL.E WAS6-OINGTUN November 10, 1978 Mr. S teve Ho rob rows k i Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Re: Revious Addition Dear Mr. Horobrowski; This letter is to verify that the easements as shown on the final plat of Revious Addition are acceptable to Vera Water and Power. Sincerely, \ bb~~ ~ William J. o Assistant Manager WJJ/vg #132 cc: Senske and Associates ~ c N ANE co~~ ~E~y~ Sp~K~G DEP pR~ PLAN t F V ' 7S , ~ THRESHOLD OETERMINATION OECLARATION OF ( oposed/final ~t14~V S l~ A AUC4F (significance/nonsignificance 1 Oescription of Proposal•,~~/~~~Q~ 0 P i ~ ;V 4* A4, 4sgd KfAidi ii-Y w "A* ~?"i tYj I( 1? /43)n,77e41 2. Proponent: Ko&-)u ,~~'Tt) 3. Contact Person: we a Phone.~~~ 4 County Action (s) Requested: `001~ Zone Change; 40000' Preiiminary Plat Approval- Final Plat Approval, Change of Condition Other• 5 Locaclon of Proposal. er ~ra~ ~ . ~ 5. Lead Agency: SP0KANE C0UNTY, "dASHING70N Thi rooasai has been determined to tVQ"r have a significant adverse imQact on the enviranment. .4n EIS is ~required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a com- oleted environmental checkl;st and other tinformation oR fiie with the lead agency 7. ResponsTble Qffl cial. Proposed Oeclaration Final Declaration Name Name ~ • Signature Stanature ~ Title / 0 #"XIU Title ~ oepartment t. oepartment . D~ • Date ~ ~ Oa te Department Reference i~o. 8. For Declarations of Significance Only: Qate of Expected Oraft EIS AvaiTability (determined bv Responsible Official) Date of Issuance TO BE COtdPLETED BY RESPOfVSIBLE OFFICIAL: a. Brief description and listing of those environmental impacts leading to such declaration: b. Brief explanation of wfnat measures, if any, could be taken by the applicant to prevent or mitigate tne environmentai impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised ~ proposat with a possible resulting declaration or nonsignificence: ~ ~ ~ . . NO. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING PRELIMINARY PLAT PROPOSAL AND ZONE RECLASS- IFICATION, PE-1204-78, Revious Additioni ZE-94-78, Aqricultural to AQricultural Suburban and SinQle Family. WHEREAS, The Spokane County Planning Commission did, after public hearing on August 25, 1976, forvvard to the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation that the preliminary plat to be known as Revious Addition, (File Number PE-1204-78) be denied; and, WHEREAS, Mr. Keto , did request a special hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to present evidence and testimony against the recommendation of the Planning Commission to deny the above described preliminary plat and zone reclass- ification; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioner did hold a public hearing on October 161 19781 to consider the recommendations of the Planning Commission and testimony and request of the plat sponsor, objectors, and other interested parties; and, WHEREAS, at said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above described preliminary plat proposal and zone reclassification, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, having fully considered the test- imony given, the records and minutes of the Planning Commission, the environmental checklist, and all other evidence presented, and further having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, does hereby find that the conclusions of the Planning Commission were not generally valid and sufficient. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners does conclude that the preliminary plat to be known as Revious Addition and zone reclassification upgrading to Single Family Residential should be and hereby is approved, subject to the Conditions contained in the Planning Staff's Findings, dated August 25, 1978, provided that the following additional conditions be complied with: 1) That the plat be redesigned to meet the requirements for the single family zone. 2) That the temporary cul-de-sac is approved with the understanding that future development will decide whether or not the cul-de-sac will remain permanent- ly. The Board also concurs with the Planning Staff's recommendation that no significant adverse environmental impacts will result and a Declaration of Non-Significance be issued. -1- i~ ]aA T E D T HI S ~ DAY O F 19 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COU NTY, WAS INGTO N ATTEST: 900900 V N W. OHLAND le of Board By. ~ . ~ STAFF FINDINGS - Auqust.25, 1978 M Iq . ZE- PE-1204-78 - Revious ttonA ri cultural Suburban 3~ AU~ 9ricultu PRELIMINARY SUBOIVISIONS AND ZONE RECIASSIFICATIONS 9' 14r~/~L 1. GENERAL INFORMATION : A. Location -South Central Valley location adjacent to and west of Sullivan Road approximately 320 feet south of 8th Avenue. B. Proposal ' -Subdivision of 4.63 acres into fifteen lots for single family dwellings. ~ -Typical lot frontage = 80 feet. -Typical lot size = 9,796 to 11,771 square feet. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan -Approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage with no - density designated. - -Surrounding area is also designated as residential on the Comprehensive Plan. D. Existing Land Uses -West of Sullivan Road, within a quarter mile of the proposed site, the land uses are residential, with similar densities occurring in subdivisions to the 3 South. -Directly across Sullivan Road to the east is Central Valley High School and playfield with presently vacant land further east. -There are no significant topographic features associated with the site. ~ E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses I -The proposed preliminary plat appears to be compatible with the existing land use in the area. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION: . A. Circulation -The County Engineer has examined the proposed plat and basically approves the ~ road system proposed. -Engineer recomnends the dedication of 10 feet additional right-of-way along ' Sullivan Road; and further requests no direct access to Sullivan Road from lots in the plat. -With regard to the dedication of 10 feet of additional right-of-way (above), that a release from utility cornpany easement should be secured. - 6a - (cont'd.) . f f ~ ► , ,4 .a ~ F--, ,~.•p . ~c a~ nz, ~ - - i . FINDINGS - August 25, 1~,,8 Revious Addition I. SPECIAL INFORMATION: - cont'd. B. Sewage Disposal -The applicant has analyzed sewage alternatives, and his report is in the offi- cial file for the plat. The sewerage alternatives examined: on-site septic tanks; conmunity septic tank; and community package treatment plant. The Con- sulting Engineer's report concludes that on-site septic tanks should be allowed and are the most economically realistic alternative. -Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the preliminary plat. The Oistrict also states that an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 15 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. The Health District also requires a public water system, including fire flows, to serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer; ~ and the Health District, in their examination of the possible impact an ground- water quality resulting from this proposal, have the following comments: Impact discussion: a. The plat sponsor has proposed 15 lots on 4.63 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. ' b. In the course of the conduct o.f the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and - the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the yuality of the groundwater. In sunmary, he concluded that: (1) In norrnal precipitation years,subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (Z) Al1 dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the ground- water. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react~~with soil I particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (197.5) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/l. The forecast year 2020 maximwn incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background." ....."The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when com- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume , and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." - 66 - (cont'd.) FINDINGS - August 25,'T978 Revious Addition Impact discussion - co+it'd. , c. Currently, results of cheniical analysis show the total nitrogen.content of the groundwater as in the range of 0.52 to 2.22 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges of .56 ppm. tu 2.41 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppni. d. Alternative sewage disposal inethods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics: (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this project. . (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. C. Orainage ' -The site is relatively flat and on-site drainage facilities will adequately handle surface water. -Standard techniques for stormwater control should be incorporated into the , street and road improvements with plans approved prior to final plat. _ D. Water Supply -Proposed Preliminary plat is located within the boundaries of the Vera Water and Power Oistrict. -The District advises they can provide adequate water to the project. E. Fire Protection -Situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection District #1. -Both mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection should be included as a condition of approval, as determined by the Fire District. F. Schools -Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District #365. -The proposed plat is located directly across the street and to the west of Central Valley High School. -The District facilities are close to capacity levels. G. Parks ► -There are no parks in the irniiediate vicinity of the project. -The report, "Planning for Parks," (revised 1976), locates a proposed park adjacent to the school site and appr•oximately 1/4 mile to the east of the proposed plat. H. Unique Environmental Features - None have been identified in the inventory. I. Cultural Resources - None have been identified through the Spokane County Cultural Resources Survey. - 6 C - ;cont' d ) . , , FINDINCS: August. 25, 1-,8 Revious Addition IIII. ZONING ANALYSIS: ~ -Pending approval Wi the final plat, it would be appropriate to reclassify the , zoning to Agricultural-Suburban. -Land to the east past Cerltral Valley High School is zoned Agricultural with Agricultural-Suburban designation uccurring to the southwest. (j f -Generally, the zoning within 1i2 mile of the site is Agricultural and Agricul- tural-Suburban with some sinyle family use occurring west of Sullivan Road. Commercial zoning exists on most of the land adjacent to Sprague Avenue. I V. EfjV I RONMENTAL REV I EW: -Environmental checklist subinitted by the sponsor has been reviewed. -No significant adverse environmental impacts were identified. -Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified from the checklist in the following categories: Earth; Air; Water; Flora; Noise; Light and Glare; Land ~ Use; Population; 1lousing; Transportation/Circulation; Public Services; and Utilities. -Tne Staff has issued, through the Planniny Dir.ector, a proposed Qeclaration of Non-Significance; and it is currently circulating to other agencies of juris- diction. V. CONDITIOtJS: -If approval is granted, the Staff recommends the following: -Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats," August l, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department. -NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated spearately and listed below: -P-15 P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, P-G, P-7, P-81 P-9 (Sept.l, 1979) P-13. -E-1, E-2, E-3, E-49 E-5, E-6 -A-1 -H-1 -That the provisions of SPEa'S NOTICE OF aCTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within ttiirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval, as instruc- ted by the Planniilg Oepartment Staff. -That a public water system, serviced by the Vera Water and Power District, including fire flows, serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. , -That final construction plans for on-site storiii drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer. -That upon filiny of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Agricultural- Suburban. - 6D - (cOnt'd,) • - w . FIyDI4G5 - August 25, 1978 Revious Addition V. CONDITIUNS - cont'd. -That the Plannirlg Coiiuiiission sustain the issuance of a pr•oposed Declaration of Non-Significance atiid recouunends issuance of a final Declaration of Non- Significance. -That the project sporisor may riot be notified by the Planning Department of the need to request an extension of time for the renewal of any preliminary plat approval granted by i:;ie Board of County Coinmissioners. -That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. (36 foot ' paved section curb to curb; curb on Sullivan Road to 24 feet from the center line.) -That dedication of 10 feet additional right-of-way along Sullivan Road be achieved by a release from the utility company easement. -That no direct access to Sullivan Road from lots in the plat be permitted except Lot l, Block 1. - I I ~ - 6E - ' _ I September 14, 1978 6oard of County Caem1=sloners Opokane County Courthouse W 1116 Broadway . . . . Spokane. MIA. Re: PE-1204-76, Revious Addltlon Appeal Request 6ent1 snen : . . . As requeatad by the Board at tbe Bvard's Hearing on Monday, September 11, 197" the Planning Department has researcbed_tbe tile to determine the proprlety the appeal request. It is this Departraent's recaamendation that the Appeal request 1s va11d and reasonable, and therefora, should be scheduled for Nea.: by the Board. . 1'ollowing background inforntloo rss .consfdered 1n our reconmendation: ) June 30, 1978 - Planning Cmtsston consldered Pre11m1nary Pldt (16 lots - single tan11y zoniog ) The Planning Cannlsslon's_action was Lo continue Lo July 28, 1978 because improper maps had_bten.supplled by the appllcant to County Deptrtments. , . , _ 2) Ju]y 28, 1978 - Planning Comisslon.revlewed the revised Prellm4nary Plat for 16 lots and proposed.single•famlly zone classlfication. It was determined that the lots fa!]ed to.meet the minlmurn standards for the Singlt-famlly zone classlftcatlon. _ The Planning Comalssion's.ection was to continue tor 30 days because of 1mproper zoning. (P1ano1n9.Cana+lsslon telt 1t ahould be edvertlsed !or Agrlcultural-Suburben); dedlcatlon of right-at-rvays; short plat vlolatlons; and lmproper legal descrlptlon. 3) August 25, 1978 - Plannlnq Camlsslon revlermd resubmitted plat for 15 lots and Agricultural Suburban zoning. The appllcant resolved short plat probldn; legal. descrlptlon;-and zoning problems. ' . t ' A , . , . ' ` ;~•f . V 1 ~r. ~r' , ~f• , ' i'~ ~ ' ~ , ' _J' . ~ BoaTd of cAul1ty Gommis!'~one1"S Pige 2 - The Plannin+g Ccxwl ssionfs.action was to d+eny tte p1at because ot Improprr . zorting. Apparently the Planning Connnission felt that this area was more suftable far single;family zvne c1a~~if1cation ttran Agricuatural. . ~Suburben., w _ . `~~~efvr~e. tF~1 s 1 ssue an~d suG,~+rct.o~'_ the appeal i s. the ~determ~lnativn af an appro~- . p~'date zone c1ass1fi1cation. fte=xone. c]assificatlv°n_ (S1ng"fe-Family) requlres _ larger lot s1res than the Agricultural Su'burban which th1s epplicant f~ proposing, _ ~ . Fred L. Dayharsh 'Marr'nlng ffirector Tha+mas L. Davi s ~ ~ ~enfar Mannir, Zurr.ent Manr~ing Wn. . CC: Jerry Neal . ~ . . . . . . ~ - Wa11y Hubbard . . . _ - . . , F!_.D/TC.D,/tfj . . _ . . _ ~ T/~~~-~'~~ L ,f ~ ? ~ „7 ~ f~~ ~ r" ~ c~,r~ r ~ ~ ~ r r~ / ~ g r-L__ ^jc) A R, tL,\ ~ CX__ 2- ~ ) , ~ ~ f~~ - ~ , . ~ BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKAhE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER C0NCERNING PRELIP7INARY ) SUBDIVISION PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION ) AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ZE-94-781, ~ COMMISSIONERS DECISIOiV AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN } AND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ) Sponsor: Ken Keto ) This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, to render its decision concerning the request of Ken Keto, East 13701 Sprague Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 for the above captioned preliminary subdivision and zone classification upgrading; and The Board having received the recommendation of the Spokane County . Planning Commission to deny the preliminary plat, said denial set forth in the Planning Commission's minutes of its August 25, 1978 meeting; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on October 16, 1978, at the request of the plat sponsor, Mr. Keto, and after visiting the , site and reviewing the testimony; and • The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evic+ence available to the Board to approve the plat ti-Jith single family residential zoning, subject to conditions. (The Board noted that it 4,rould be necessary to redesign subject plat to comply with R1 zoniny) The Board stated its approval of the placement of a temnc,rary cul de sac with the understanding that future development will deterrnine whether or not the cul de sac will remain permanently. The Board also concurred in the Planning Staff's recommendation that no significant adverse impacts will result and a Declaration of Non-Significance be issued. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter. . BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 30 day of October, 1978. VERNON W. OH A~lD Clerk of t e oard by ' _ 0 anne Montague, Depu _ . _ _ • , n NO. QEFORE THE QOARD OF COUNTY C0MMISSIUNERS OF SPOK/1NE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTEk OF THE RECUNiMENDAT-IONS FROM ) THE SPOKANE COUPJTY PLANNING COMMISSION ) RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S AGENDA DATED ) AUGUST 25, 1978. WHEREAS, The Qoard of County Conunissioriers of Spokane County, pur-sLiant to the provi- sions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620, shall upon receipt oF any recornnended official control or amendment thcreto, at its next regular public meeting set the date for apublic meeting wher•e it may, by ardinance, adopt or reject the official control or amendmerit; and WHERE/1S, the Qoard of County Commissioners of Spokane County, did by Resolution No. 78 1181 acknotivledge receipt of the recommendations from the Spokane County Planning Coi►u»ission concerning its Ayenda, dated August 25, 1978; and w'HEREAS, the Board of County Corunissioners of Spokane County, did by said resolut,on set tfii s 11 th ciay of Septeniber to cons i der tfie receutineridati ons of tfie Pl anni riy Co,m- niission concerning its August 25, 1978 Agenda, a copy of said recoinniendations are attached hereto and incorporated Iierein by r-eference. NcJt-ol, THEREFORE, aE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Coi>>missioners of SpoE•ane County, Washi ngton, that based upon the i ni oi-ina tion ava i 1 abl P to the Boar(i and the testimony at this meetinq, the following action vias taken: A. 3. PRUPUSED Ah1CNUKPlTS 'fU TFIC SflORt PLAT UltUlN/INCE AND REL111rLL FCC SCI-I[:DIJLE: The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's rtcommendation tc approvc the Amendinents to the Short Plat Ordinance anJ related foe schedu7e as proposed. B. 1. PE-1011-76, SWj1N ACRFS FIRST ADDITIOtJ ZE- 59-76, AGR I CULTUkAL to S INGL G FA,'~i I LY RES IDFNT IAL - Swaii The Qoard concurrecl v!ith the f'lanning Cor~►>>>~sion's recommendafiion to approve the Extension of Time to September l, 1979, 2. PE-1026A-76, KENNE`r' SJUaD I V 1 S I ON, #2 ZE- 781;-7b, ,'l~ll I~CUI.TURAL to S I PJ~aLE FAM I LY f1cS I DENT IAI. - Keri►,ey The Board concurred w i th the Pl anni ny (:omii»i ssi on' srecomi>>ondation ta approve the Extensifln of Time tu Septei»bPr l, 1979. 3. PS-111II-77, SOUTH RIDGC VIEW 5th ADGITIGN ZS- 114-77 , AG(z I CULTUfZAL SUE3U(Za11N to SRTGL E FAM I LY RES IDEiVT IAL - S,rartou t The Board concurred wi th the Pl anni ny Commissi on's ►•:~~commendati on to dpprove the Exi.crision ofi Tiiiie to Septcviher 1, 1919. 4. PN-1129-77~ FA1Rl1OUD CREST N0. 7 ZN- 136-77, AGRICULYURAL SU[3UflCAN to SINGLE F<<MIl_Y RESIDEN1Ii'tL-Farrow t;onst. The Qoard corcurrecl with the Planning Commi;sion's recoiiimendation to approve the Extension of Time to September l, 1979. C. 5. PE-1141-77, MOUNT~',rN UICW MEAU0415 ZC- 1E1-77, AGIZICI)LIURl1L to SINGLE FAMILY RCSIDENTTAL Eiaviny received a communication in disagrecment t•rith ttie :'lai,ninj C~)irnmi;- sioii's recowumendation for apprGval of a(:hange of Caiiditioll fron; 59 to only 24 lots, the Board referred the matter to the planning stafi and took the request for hearjng on 26 1 ots under advi sement. -1- / a a L/ .•~e~ ~ . 4iw .,Z D. f. PE-1204-78, RE1fYOUS ADDITION ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRiCULTURAL SUBURBAN - Keto Having received a communication in disagreement with the Planning Commis- s14n's recommendation for denial , the Board referred the matter tv the P1anning Staff and toak the request €or hearing under adviseme~rt. 7. PE-7 2l 6-78, MOLTER ADDITION ZE- 174-78, AGRICULTURAL & AGRICfJLTURAL SUBURBAN to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Transwestern Rea7ty The Baard cancurrred wi th the Planni ng Commi ss7 an' s recommendati on to deny the request far thi s prelimi nary pl at appl i cati an ,for the reason as -stated in the minutes of the Planning Cammisszan hearing. PE-1209-78, SOU7H ADAMS ADDITION ZET 92-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE - and TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - McKi nl ey The Board coracurred wi th the P1 anning Commi ssi on that no acti on was necessar.y on thi sp7 at appl i cation for the reasan stated in the nii nutes af the P1 anni ng Commi ssion' s Heari ng ,and that it shvul dbe contl nued vrr an indefi ni te bas is. E. 9. PE-7217-78y MICA f~EADOWS ZE- 110-78, AGRICULTURAL t❑ AGRICULTIJRAL Sl1BURBAN -Zaracore The Board cancurred wi th the Planni ng Commi ssi on' s recami-nendatlora ta apprave the prel i minary p1 at , sub j ect ta the condi tians as contai ned i n the m1 nutes of the Pl annir,g Cvmn7i ssi on' s Hear7 ng,with considerati on of the envi rqnmental review. . Yhe BOd1"d al50 conCLJk"red W7 th ann1 ng Conillli 5514n'S f"eC0i11T12ndat7 OCl t0 zane the property to the Agricultural Suburban zone classification upan the filing of the final plat. The Saard took no action an the resolutian and map pendi ng the fi 1 i ng af the final plat. 10. PE-1218-78, UPPER COLUMBIA ,4Dai~~ON ZE- 111-78., AGRICULTURAL to AGRI CULTURAL SUBURBAN -No11 The Board cancurred wi th the P1 anning Commi ssi on' s recomrnendation ta apprOve the prelirninary plat, subject to the conditions as cantained in the minutes ❑f the Pl ann i ng Coninii ssi on' s Meari ng ,wi th considerati orr of the enrri ronmental review. The Board also concurred wi th the Pl anni rrg C0i7iiiii ss7 on' s rec~lTlmendation that the property should be zoned Single FaiTi7ly Residential upan the fil ing af the fi na7 pl at. The Board took no acti on on the resoluti on and map pendi ng the filing of the final plat. 71. PE-1219-78, ANCNOR SECURITIES 0.3 REPLAT ZE- 112-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FANfLY RfSTDEN7IAL - ICeto The Baard concurred with the P1 anni ng Commi ssion' s recommendati on to apprav+e the prel iminary pl at, subject to the condi tions as contained i nthe niinutes of the Planning Commission`s Hearing, with consideration vf the eflviranmental review. . The Soard al sa concurred with the Planning ComEriissian' s recommendati on to zane the prvperty to the Si ng7 e Family Resi denti al zone ci assif i cati on upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no act3on on the resolution and map pending the filing vf the final plat. 12. PE-1220-78, GRICK'S SUaDIVISIDN 7E-- 715-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SCJBURBAN - Crick The Baard concurred wi th the Pl anni ng Commission' s recominendation to approve the preliminary p7at, subject ta the conditions as contained in the ininutes of the Planrting Commission's Hearing, with consideration of the environmental rev7 ew. The Board also concurred with the P7anning CoN-nniission's recorniriendation ta zone the praperty ta the Agricultural Suburban zone classifieatian upon the fi1 i ng of the final pl at . The Baard taok na acti on on the resol uti on and map pending the fi 1 ing of the final p1 at. ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 4W) 13. PE-1221-78, MICA VIEW 2nd ADDITION ZE- 118-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN - Seipp The Board conctirred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's Hearing, with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to zone the property to the Agricultural Suburban zone classification upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED That the Board hereby authorizes its chairman to sign Final Declarations of tJon-Significance for each item approved above, subject to compliance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15.340. BY THE ORDER OF THE BOARD THIS ~I DAY OF 1978. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ~ 40 ATTEST : VER90'0 W. OHLAN ~ \ ~`C rk of the, Eoard' ~ i , ~ • BY : C-~- t- ~ / Deputy' BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IPd THE MATTER CONCERNIPlG PRELIMINARY ) SUBDIVISION PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION } AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ZE-94-78, ~ f40TICE OF PUBLIC HEARIiVG AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN ) AND SIiJGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ) Sponsor: Ken Keto ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIUEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 1:30 P.M., on October 16, 1978, at their office in the County Courthouse to consider the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification on the following described property: Located in Section 23, Township 25N., Range 44 E.W.M. Approximatel,y four (4) acres of land on South Sullivan Road. The South half of Tract 142, Vera, according to Plat recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. EXCEPT the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. Commonly known as that property on the west side of Sullivan at the intersection of Sullivan and 9th Avenue. fIOTICE IS FURTHER GIUEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse enviranmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony either for or against the application for the above mentioned preliminary subdivision and zone reclassification. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 18 day of September, 1978. VERNON W. OHLAND Cl erk of the'B.dard ~ ~ a by P r i . ~ fto anne h1ontague, Deputy Cl erk / << - - ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION APPEAL REQUEST FORM Your name: Ken Keto Date: 8-31-78 by iom 5tade ieAddress: E13701 Soraaue. Sookane. Wa. -r1~1 1~~: SPr ~~.~K_ . Phone No:. 924-8600 ~o Isj~ Planning Commission Action Being Appealed *4 ISSj4 FAS Title Revious Addition I. D. Number PE-1204-78 r, Date of Action 8-25-78 Signature ~ ~Your Reasons for Appeal: There seemed to be confusion over the proposed zoning and number of lots in the Planning Commission hearing. Our client was desirous of maintaininq , agr,icul tural suburban zoni ng 4•ri th 15 1 ots total. The P1 ann i ng Commi ss i on noted that the bottom row of lots was 0.8 feet short of the reQuired 80 foot frontage for single family residential zoning, and subseQUently denied the p??*-' on that basis. We therefore request a hearing before the Board of County Commissioners to aPpeal this decision. We reouest that the Board advertise thi s matter for both acri cul tural suburban and si nal P fami 1y_re_sid .n~ti_al 70.ning such that flexibility in the decision process is available to the Board determining the number of lots to be platted and suitable zoninq. , Y ~ ~ - . RPW SeptE'mber V9 1 017C Board of County f;ommiss i oners Epokanc~ C~~~~~~ ~~urthozise t°J 17 16 6roadt:iay Spokano, E.~A. i3oo PE912V-7ns Rev1ous Additioca Appeal Request Gentler:~en: As requ~~~~d by the Board at the Qoard' s Hearing on Flonday, 5~ptember 11 p 1NG, tho Pi ann ing Departr ;ant has researched the fi1 e to determ1 ne the proAriety of t[1c appea7 r~q~jost. ~s thes ~~part~~~nt' ~ r~-Ncnmnxndation that the Appea1 request is val id and reasonab1~~ and therefo~~~ sho"ld he scheduled for irear~~~ ~hv, ~Icardo ~~~o follotiiing bacitgo~ound informatinn E,,7as considered in ouY~ ~~~~ir.siondationa 1) June 34, 1978 - Plannin~ ~~~i-dissien considered Preliminary Pl-~it (16 lots - single farnily zvning) The Planning Cor:~ission's ~~tion tias to cont9no~e to J~~~~ 2'u, 19173 because iLgpropc-w rtiaps hac~ ~~en suppl ied Uiy the applicant tv County 13'E+pa1 te1+1eY1ti1 r 2) Ju1y 205 1970 - Pi~nnin~,~ Con~-iissiori roviewcd the rcwised Pra1 imi6~~~y Plat for 16 1~~~ ~nO proposQd single-family zone c1assificatiaal. ~t t-as determi ~~at the lots fai1 ed tv c; eet thn minir~~um standard s for the Single-~anii~~ ~~nc, c1assificatqora. The PlanninC Covft~yiqssiori's action vas ~~ntinaaa for 31 lu'a,ys Lecause of improper zoning9 (P7anninq Conrmission folt it ghols1d be a4vee^tised for Ac~ricu1tura1-Suburban', dedicatfon of ric~fit-~~~~:jaysy short p1at violations; and i~iiproper 1ega1 dc-scr~~tiona 3) Au~~st 25, 1D78 ~ ~~ann9~~~ ~erMssion rovtiec~ed rns0ni~~~~ ~~~t for 15 1ots and A.;r~cu1 tttral ~~~~~~~~an zo`~~ngo The applicaiit rosolved sliort p1at rrcabl~m,, 1egai descriptior~- and zoning probleTits. ~ )000 Board af County Commissioners Page 2 The Planning Cornmission's act9on tilas to deny the p1a#: because of impropor zoning. Apparently the Plannixir Commmission felt that this area tsas more suitable for single-fami1v zone classification thara Agrieultural Suburban. Thorefore, this issue and subjeGt of the appeal is the determinattion of an apprv- pr~iate zone c1assification. Qne zone classification (Sinqle-F'ami1y) requqrc~ ~arger lot sizes than the Agricultural Suburban which this applicant is proposinga Fred L. Dayharsh Planning Director TF~ortas L. Tl,,avis Scnior Planner, Current Planninq Admin. CC: Jerry 6aeai I1ally alubbard FLO/TLD/dj r ~ s - SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 August 29, 1978 Honorable Board of County Commissioners , Spokane County Court House D Spokane, WA. 99260 ' P Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, August 25, 1978, at 8:30 A.M., to 12:00 noon, reconvenina at 1:30 PX, to 6:30 P.M., in the Hearing Room at N. 721 Jefferson, the enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Planning Commission members present: Mr. Ted McCoury, Chairman; Mrs. Ab~y Byrne, and Messrs. KeMnedy, Main, Quigley and Thomas. Plan'ning staff present: Wa11is D. Hubbard, Plat Administrator; Pat,Frankovic, Assistant Plat Adminis- trator; Tom Davis, Current Planning Administrator; Gary Fergen, Steve Horobi- owski, Mrs. Johnson and Mrs. Blanchard. Engineers' office, Kennaly. Health District: Prather. Prosecutor's office: Emacio. , Sincerely, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Ted McCourY, Chairman 41s Fred L. ayDi,rector of Planning ~l TMC:myb Official minutes and record of action taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at their regular hearing held on August 25, 1978. ~ - ' • ~ • PLANPJING COMMISSION HEARING - MINUTES ' August 25, 1978 C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION 6HANGE OF CONDITION 5. PE-1141-77, MOUNTAIN VIEW MEADQt~S for a CHANGE \CONDITIO by Swanson, and ZE- 161-77, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGL`E,,FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. The at sponsor's representative presented at the Hea 'ng a different proposal t n that which had been presented to the Plat Adminis ator for advertising and peared on the Agenda. The Health Department and t Plat Administrator, as 11 as the mission members, did not have available evious to the hearing, w t the spo or's representative asked for at the hea 'ng. The original Change f Con- dition ad proposed a change from 59 lots to 24 ots. At the hearing, a quest was made or approval of 26 lots. After considera e testimony it was prop ed: That the C ge of Condition be APPROVED for 24 lots nly. . le (Motion to appro by Kennedy, seconded by Byrne. Vote i favor was unanimous. D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS . 6. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION (cont'd. from July 28, 1978 Hrg.) by Keto, and ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: That the preliminary plat request be DENIED. Principle reason given was improper zoning. There was con- siderable discussion concerning school overcrowding, and park allowance in new subdivision applications. There was discussion concerning the higher density allowance in Agricultural Suburban zoning than there is in Single Family Resi- dential. A ~ P . (Motion to approve by Main, seconded by Kennedy. Vote wa~ J~el§'" nd five ii no I S it, ) 7. PE-1216-78','I4,,LTER ADDITI0N by Transwestern Real ty, a ZE- 114-78, AG~R.ICULTURAL & aGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN to SI~I FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the prelimirr, ry lat request be DENIED. Presentation as made by Hubbard, and h added conditions presented by the Pa ific Gas Transmission t r,ight-of-way part of the proposed plat is ocated. (Prior Company, across whose the plat's sponsor, ip to opposing testimony, t~a~, Commission recessed for lunch.) There re petitions and one letter presened ih~protest of the proposed plat, along with posing t testimony. Reason for de.niaT~~as that the proposed plat, as designed a with the proposed zoning, is incompatible ~with the surrounding area, which is prin ' ally used for farm land and animal rais~ g. (Motion to approve by Byrne, seconded Kennedy. Vote was unanimously opposed. ~ 12:00 No - Luncheon Meeting- pics of discussion included: tensions of Time De ities of Agricultural Zoning & other den 'ties Agri ltural Suburban witn a lesser requirement han Single Fa 'ly Residential _ Cost of S dividing Discussion Fringe Study Area Drafting a rec mended Interim Waste Water Policy for the-Valley-- Mention of sewer corridor - 6 - . . ~ PLAPJNING COMMISSION HEARING FIINUTES ° Auqust 25, 1978 \\\Other Business T\received some discussion,and objec~~on from a developer represen~•ative with rthe $240 zoning reclassification fee being charged with plat applica- t'\. , My made the announcement that each of the Planning Commission m mbers had a letter from the Board of Coun;ty Commissioners which stated~that the Commissi n Hearings in September, with the exception of the September 21st Special Heari ,would be heard by the Hearing Examiner Committees. ~ , The Chairman clos~d the business discussion and announced the remainder of the hearing would address itself to Preliminary Subdivi`sion applications and zone reclassifications, ayong with related items, presented by W. D. Hubbard, Plat . Administrator, and eaN h plst sponsor or his representative; followed by favorable dnd/or opposing testimon,~e from the audience, with rebuttal allowed the sponsor. Chairman McCoury announc %dthe Agenda items in order. B. P~iELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS XTENSIONS OF TIME The \Manning Commission members~discussed at length the question;,of extensions of time,and,present policy in thaot connection. It was decided the,Policy Com- mittee would`meet and set a stricte~r policy as to necessary proof by the sponsor what he had accomplished, how many extensions of time should be grari'ted, etc. Mr. Prather~,of\the Heal th Di stri ct ez~p~ressed a desi re to meet wi th the,,Pol i cy Committee in',regard to extensions of time, as this has been a problem i his department al s'o,.~ , - 1. PE-1011-76, S'WAN ACRES FIRST ADDITION foor an EXTENSION OF TIME by Swa\ n, and ZE- 59-763 AGR\LCULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY\RESIDENTIAL: That the Extension'~of Time be granted to September l, 1979. It ~vas noted by the Commission r~embe,rs that this is the second extension of time on S~ran Acres First Add. (~~oti on to a rove b\~Thomas seconded b Mai n. V PP Y.~ ~ y ote 1n favor was unanimous.) 2. , PE-1026A-76 KENiVEY' S SUBDIVISION #2 for an EXTENSI`QN OF TIME by Kenney, and `ZE- 78A-76 AGRICULTURAL TQ,SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That an Extension of Time be granted to Septembe1979. . . - (Motion to approve by Quigley, seconded by i<ennedy. Vote in favor was unani- , mous.)'. ` ~ 3. PS-1118-77', SOUTH RIDGE VIEW 5th ADD%., for an EXTENSION OF TIP ~ bY Swartout, and ZS- 114-77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAfJ TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: \wa an Extension of Time be granted to Septembe\r l, 1979. a(Motion to a rove . b B rne seconded b Thomas. V P P Y Y , y o t e i n f a v o a nim o u s.) ~ 4. PN-1129_77 , FA I RbJ00D ~CREST NO. 7 for an EXTENS~ION OF TIME by Farrow Cor~~tr., and ZN- 136 77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAIV TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. That the Exten- ' sion of Time be granted to September l, 1979. , . (Motion to approve by Thomas,,\seconded by Main. Vote in favor was unanimous.) ~ `\5 _ . \ \ ZONE RECIASSIFICATION 1477Y ~ OR ; PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION ~ ~ ~21~,G~• ACTION TAKEN APPROVE . DENY CONTINUE L3ENGTH OF CON'TINUANCE ~ REASO NS 1. 2. 3. 4. CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning Staff' s Finding s, Dated L" - S, y~s, , and subject to the additional cAditions that 2. : 3. , VOTE Motion by 7A,4 Seconded by , ` VOTE YES ~ NO 67 p~ izo~ a ~ ~ STAFF FINDINGS - Auqust 25, 1978 PE-1204-78 - Revious Addition ZE- 94-78 - Agricultural to Agricultural/Suburban PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS I. GENERAL INFORMATION: A. Location -South Central Valley location adjacent to and west of Sullivan Road approximately 320 feet south of 8th Avenue. B. Proposal ' -Subdivision of 4.63 acres into fifteen lots for single family dwellings. -Typical lot frontage = 80 feet. -Typical lot size = 9,796 to 11,771 square feet. C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan -Approved rnap of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage with no density designated. -Surrounding area is also designated as residential on the Comprehensive Plan. D. Existing Land Uses -West of Sullivan Road, within a quarter mile of the proposed site, the land uses are residential, with similar densities occurring in subdivisions to the south. -Directly across Sullivan Road to the east is Central Valley High School and playfield with presently vacant land further east. _ -There are no significant topographic features associated with the site. E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses -The proposed preliminary plat appears to be compatible with the existing land use in the area. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION: A. Circulation -The County Engineer has examined the proposed plat and basically approves the road system proposed. -Engineer recommends the dedication of 10 feet additional right-of-way along ' Sul1ivan Road; and further requests no direct access to Sullivan Road from lots in the plat. -4Jith regard to the declication of 10 feet of additional right-of-way (above), that a release from utility cornpany easement should be secured. - 6A - ( cor,t' d. ) ~ FINDINGS - August 25, 1518 Revious Addition I. SPECIAL INFORMATION: - cont'd. B. Sewage Disposal -The applicant has analyzed sewage alternatives, and his report is in the offi- cial file for the plat. The sewerage alternatives examined: on-site septic tanks; community septic tank; and community package treatment plant. The Con- sulting Engineer's report concludes that on-site septic tanks should be allowed and are the most economically realistic alternative. -Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the preliminary plat. The District also states that an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 15 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. The Health District also requires a public water system, including fire flows, to serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer; ~ and the Health District, in their examination of the possible impact on ground- water quality resulting from this proposal, have the following comments: Impact discussion: a. The plat sponsor has proposed 15 lots on 4.63 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and - the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitation years,subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) Al1 dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the ground- -water. Nowever, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, wnich are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. 1 (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/l. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background." ....."The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when com- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume , and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." - 6B - ( cont'd.} , . ` FINDIPdGS - August 25, 1978 Revious Additian Impact discussion - cont'd. c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen_content of the groundwater as in the range of 0.52 to 2.22 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges of .56 ppm. to 2.41 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppni. d. Alternative sewage disposal inethods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics. (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently econoiTiically available for this project. . (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or cornrnunity, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. C. Drainage -The site is relatively flat and on-site drainage facilities will adequately handle surface water. -Standard techniques for stormwater control should be incorporated into the street and road improvements arith plans approved prior to final plat. . D. Water Supply -Proposed Preliminary plat is located within the boundaries of the Vera Water and Power Oistrict. -The District advises they can provide adequate water to the project. E. Fire Protection ^ -Situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection District #l. -Both mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection should be included as a condition of approval, as determined by the Fire District. F. Schools -Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District #365. -The proposed plat is located directly across the street and to the west of Central Valley High School. -The District facilities are close to cap3city levels. G. Parks ► -There are no parks in the iminediate vicinity of the project. -The report, "Planning for Parks," (revised 1976), locates a proposed park adjacent to the school site and approximately 1/4 mile to the east of the proposed plat. H. Unique Environmental Features - None have been identified in the inventory. I. Cultural Resources - None have been identified through the Spokane County Cultural Resources Survey. - 6 C ' ;cont' d ) r ~ FINDINGS: August 25, 1~f78 Revious Addition III. ZOfVING ANALYSIS: -Pending approval o-17 t~ie final plat, it would be appropriate to reclassify the zoning to Agricultural-Suburban. . -Land to the east past Central Valley Hiyh School is zoned Agricultural with Agricultural-Suburban designation occurring to the southwest. -Generally, the zoning within 112 mile of the site is Agricultural and Agricul- tural-Suburban with some single family use occurring west of Sullivan Road. Commercial zoning exists on most of the land adjacent to Sprague Avenue. I V. EIIV I RONMENTAL REV I EW': -Environmental checklist submitted by the sponsor has been reviewed. -No significant adverse environmental impacts were identified. -Slight adverse environrnental impacts were identified from the checklist in the following categories: Earth; Air; Water; Flora; Noise; Light and Glare; Land ~ Use; Population; Ilousing; Transportation/Circulation; Public Services; and Utilities. -Tne Staff has issued, through the Planning Director, a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance; and it is currently circulating to other agencies of juris- diction. V. CONDITIOrds: -If approval is granted, the Staff recommends the following: -Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced in - the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats," August l, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department. -NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated spearately and listed below: -P-l, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, P-G, P-7, P-8, P-9 (Sept.l, 1979) P-13. -E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6 -A-1 -H-1 -That the provisions of SPEA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43,21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within triirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval, as instruc- ted by the Plannitin Department Staff. -That a oublic wa-Ler system, serviced by the Vera Water and Power District, including fire flows, serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. -That final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer. -That upon filiny of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Agricultural- Suburban. - 6D - (cont'd.) ti FIyDItNGS - August 25, 1978 Revious Addition V. CONDITIONS - cont'd. - -That the Planning Conmiission sustain the issuance of a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance aiid recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non- Significance. -That the project sponsor may not be notified by the Planning Department of the need to request an extension of time for the renewal of any preliminary plat approval granted by i.i'ie Board of County Coinmissioners. -That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. (36 foot ' paved section curb to curb; curb on Sullivan Road to 24 feet frorn the center line.) -That dedication of 10 feet additional right-of-way along Sullivan Road be achieved by a release from the utility company easement. -That no direct access to Sullivan Road from lots in the plat be permitted except Lot l, Block 1. - 6E - .,Ooe 5POKANE , VALLEq FIRE r-l" PAPATIAENT ~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 Z?Z4~~~G August 16, 1978 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson `Spokane, Wa. 99201 Dear Mr. Dayharsh : ~ . The following preliminaZ/C/l y b divysions and zone classification for upgradi ng has been/ revi ewed for fi re protecti on : PE-1204-7$ ' ZE- 94-78 Keto-~ ips and hydrants, need to be installed in this Ar a. P E-1216- 78 Mol ter/,A,ddi t•i on A ~ ZE- 114-78 Tran`swes`teAn~Real ty~ ~Mai ns- and hydrants need to be insta`~led~ ~ this area: ~ ~u PE-1209-78~ So' h-Adams Addition \"7 ~ ~,t ZE- 92-78 McKinley~Mains and f~ydrants_ neetl o be installed in this,area. ~ . . PE-12117,-~78' Mi cvMeadows v ~ ZE- 10-78~Zaracor~e-' Mains and hydrant~ne d~to e installed in , th4s area. ! ~ y . ~f PE~1218-'78 ~¢Upper Columbia Addition J,ZE- 111-78; No11- Mains and hydrants need to~be instalJed in this area ~ PE-1219-7II -Anchor Securi ti es P#3 Repl at r=~-_ ti ZE- 112-78 Keto- Mains and hydrants need to be in'stalled~in this area ` R E C E I V E aUG 1 71978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ PRE VENT FIRES SA VE LI VES - ~ ~v~~ /7, ~UFFIc,~, OF C~►tJNTY E~f~GII..~ R SrOKl1NE COUNYY, WASNINGTON Dat~ - ~ 19.7t Intor-ofNto Communicotion T! PI.ANNI NG COlMS S ION - - f" GAiIY KENNALY, PLANNINC 6 TRAFFIC _DIVISION ENCINEER Svb#Kf ROAD CONDIT IQN,9 " FS?ft Revious 4,~ni Q..l , *GONDITIONS CIRCL.ED APPLY TU PLAT UNDER CON.SIUERATION that conditional approval ot the plat is given subject to dedicatloR oE RJLgEtt of ~ Llay to the public and approval of the road eystes► in the Plat by the County Eagiasar, ~hat plans, profiles, and cross aections showing proposed straet centerliae and curb grades ba submitted to the County Enginear for approval ptior to conatruction and the filing of a fioal plat; , . 03 that drainage plan9 and de9lgn calculations ehoving the grades and alignmaeot of draia age iacilities be submitted to the Couaty Enginesr for approval prior tp coostructian and tha filing of afiasl plat; . 4 onstruction within the proposad public streets and easaments shall be performed under cha direct eupsrvision of a licensed land aurveyor, vho shall be responsible tor perpatua[iag all evidencs of ths loca[ion of survey monumeat• vhich pay be diaturbad during construction and who ehall futoloh tha County 8ngineer Mith "Aa Xuilt" plans and a cactificate in uriting that all improvemeota wert iosGtlled to the lina9 and grades ahovn on the approved construction plans and that al], disturbed monument9 have been replaced; 900"5)no construction vork is to be performed within the Public a.ight ot iday uatil a permir h8s been 1s9ued by the County Engineer. All work is eubjoct to inspecti,oa and approva by the County Enginet r; D6 alY conattuction within tha Public Right of Nay is to bt completad prior to filing tha final plat or a boad in tha arnount e3timazed by th• County l.aiicuor to eovar the tost of coo3truction of improviments, construction cer[ificatiott, "Aa Suilt" plans. and monu.-nenting the etreet centerlines shall be filed vith the County EngiB,aer. E 7-no direct ecceas from lots to I/2 right oE veys untll euch time edditional cight of weye are dediceted and roeds ere eetebli9hed ee County Mede. . E 8-no dicect eccess frore lote to Stub Road connectione tint11 such roeds •re constructed to County Stendarde and esteblished ee CounLy Rosde. E 9-roed design, MONO §1~ conetruc[ton. and dreinage contcol for 02 righ[e oE vaye and Stub Rvad connection9 are the responeibility of the Developer. E 10-thet the Sponaor ahell prepere and eubmlt eo the County Engtneer s de•ign proposel eccepc sb le to the S te [e Highaay Depar tme nt o f che propoeed S t ate Highway -County ELoed inter - eectlon. State Nighvey Depertment opprovel of the proposed design must be received priot- co the filing of the ftnel plet. Improvemente to the Stete Higtiwey ere to be [he reepon- sibility of the Sponeor and mey elther he cone[ructed or e bond to cover [he coe[ of such iroprovemente furniehed to the County Engineer in the emount ae determined by the Coun[y Engineer and the State Highwey Departrnent. r~ 11 heG all roads within tFie plat bc: curbed and,` peved to the 9peciffcetions of the County Engineer. F.xisting County roa(is Provid3-r►g direct eccess to lot9 of the plat ahell be C~ curbed to the sLanderds of the C:ounty Engineer. X, fowFw sec,?70,%/ c41" r. cAua.S A;~ cC-WdsJFe cJ.✓C. (p2) Deo tcAT'lu 4 0r. 10' AOD17ro,44L U&MT- oo= W,4 At&/L SVU-106664 iz0a1D . (E I. N o p lkE c_T' Orcc-Ez s-To Svc.,104•~! R-04-o r-►-A0^-+ LoT's /A/ T4F P t.AT . EX CkP7- C.o T ~ , 8 tOc.K . 04) R.E LC-A SE UTIC.'T Y C.Or+-idA y~ 3(L rv ' 12-IVJ Q(FDIc-.q 7-id..,! . ~ / 10-16-78 Ta: Spokane County Fl-alning Cammi,gsion Re: PE 1204-78 tievious Pddition :~h 94-78 Ag. to Ag. Sub. My reason to originally nddregti this issue of ror ds wp.s due to ray neighbora residing on St. Charles expressing concern ns to future plans on a 5 Ac. prrcel P143 Vera) owned by mysalf, herein raferred to rs pvrcel B143. In June 1977, I talked to the County Engineering Uept. in regc-.rds to BlA13. A preliminvry site plan wc,s sh.owm Pnd left with the ~,ngineers at thnt time for thQir review. (Copy enclosed. ) My questions primarily delt with n cul-de-src -t the ena of St. Chgrles bein; Cdequnte to serve R143, if I blocked the 4orth pa rt of f on 8th J'_venue,ond if the County would r;rant & vf-ri ~nce to uae 10tn ond St. Chorles tr,s acce~s for uur proposed new home site. SPVer&l weeks later I wa-s told the cul-de-s<3c on St. Ch~-rle s w&akdequkte, seeing how lOth would prob~-:bly go Eaet to Sullivan Rogd in the future, and tYiat llth go~s lv-iest to ProUress. T was urvnted a vEr12nce shortly there;~fter, ~-~ssuring the noihbors th.:t St. ChE-rles would remi-,in P low trrf`fic, non-throueSh streat with no plians to develop B143 in the immeditte f uture . E&rly in 1978, Pionacr Re¢.lty contncted me pnd v+mnted to know if I wsnted to sall P143. Ise-mid, "_do." They had aplpn to extend 9th into B143 from the ~nst. Itold them tk-..Pt I h(nd no plvns to have a side ro~-d cnter this trAct for I'd checked with the En;ineers, onci lso the nei~hbors f'~.vored P low trej~'f ic stroet. Some months Pfter obtvinfnc- i Plpt Y~Fp of PE 1~'04-78 Revious ILdclition, it appeprs th(-.t there is ~ temporTry cul-de-s.-c on the Viest line. If it is tempor,?ry, someone must be plc-nning g chr-nge in dosit;n Lt some uLnknown tirne in the futtzre. Plso, if 9Lh needs to tie into lUth, the developers could t;o South on thdir ~'4*est line in their land. If it has to connect to St. t;h'= rles, I'd like to know why? I'd be r litt;le pllt out if sfter buyin liome on 9th, tca fznd out lr-,tor th.vt the cul-de-sfrc wps only tempornr~,T, unless the ttetltor ct-refully explrined the mtktter bPf'orehe-nd. It vlso Fppe,,~rs th--t the density of P:; 1~;04-78 is too hi6h. I'd Pssume this nurnber might ba reauced by one or so. After giving this 5ome thou_;ht, I<<_;~.in checl.ed vdth the '19hey reroembered the situation End suggested I explpin the ftcts to the 1Dlenaing Commission in writing. I then tvlked to the iiepltor, Kdn Keto, ,~nd expressly told him the sbove informc--tion, r~nd zsk thLt this point bc brour;ht to the w-ttention of the Cornmissioners. Ken told me Lhey could m&ke the cul-ae-soc pormanerit wit,hout cny problem, cnd he v~ould expl~ in this m&t;ter tu you. Imlso esked him ubout replacing the fence f-long the 'went lino uf their prrcel. Ken stc f;ed they hmdn 't pl~:nned to ~~t this tirue. I:nentioned thpt Ir cnttle tieht fcr1c6 there hrcl been removed t:na the < dditioncl hiah schuol tv: ffic throu,,h our yt rd is undesir~-b1.e. I meYitiuned th.(,;t tro nEw cnnstruction ,~t the Nlortr Pnd of F1143 wf,e f'enced tFjith 5' cyclone, ~nd I'd like to see ~omething similer. Iwonder if these points h~ve been aiscusaed vTith either the hngineeY•s or the Pl&nning Commiaaion _at p11. This is P nice residential xr. cp which hopefully, wi71 be preaerved aa such. If the aeveloper complies with All county ordinances, lie has thH absolute ric;ht to develop. It~re just become apprehensive -~Ince: it rppeprs these points hAvcntt been expresacd to you on prcvioua occasiona. I'm more thRn tilling tu repson on ~Rny points of view. Ple~.,sc clprify thc followinE specific points in vrfting: l. tenpor~ry cul-de-asc, 2. number of lots, 3. fencc of th(-,ir 1rest linc, 4. 9th to lOth t;ie-in. T a, o F'r cc : Ploneer ~e,-,lty Spok,~6ne County Uept. of r~ngineers Spa.kanc County Board of Commiosionera C m , h ' ~ ~ ~ oC f ~ - ~ 1978 NAN spNlo%vt C No ~£P~ UNTr Rr,yENT ~ '0~ ~9~ r t ! aZ 5 + ' ~ . ` 16 6 ~ ~ ,3 S~ ~ , rt 6 y _ ' 11 Y L 1 ~ - L ILI) ~ + ~ - ~ , - t ~ tJ ~ . ~ 4 v I ~ B 1 s • . p 7 Y J ~ / ( 1 ~ ~ t S % r i( . ~ V fy 7 I , 1 l i y~ `3 ~ a e ~ ~ A7~ 1 ~ ~ ` ~/,-~l ~ a ~ . ; , •~tt i 1 I ~ ` 7S-'"_ , ~ ~ i ~ . r ~ ~ ~ ! / ~ • " - ~ •l ~ ~ if~• • ~ ~ ~ ~,p~~ ~ ~ J v ` 1 ~ ' ~ n~ ~ G ~ ~ ~ ~n L ~ V p yf.Tf'.+/ Rt'-_:h ~M.Yl~~ r.. r!!: T/► l ~ L{ + 5,.._.......~,.~.- Yr~~•r,~-e.,w.N': . ~ ~ - ~ k..~.= _o. ' - - •-:e.•,,.-a:•~ ~XJ a e ' ~ A N1 F R ! e- - , 4k ~Z s ~ ~ First American Title Company o f Spokane MAIAr OFFICE Order No. 21302 ESCROW OFFICE 6Vest 704 Ftrst Avenue CC S: S en sk i& Ma sga i I nC .North 8611 Dcvision • Sucte B SpQkaRe, Washangton 99204 Spokane County Engineers Spokane, Washington 99208 Phone. (509) 456-0550 Spokane County Planning Phone. (509) 484-1600 PLAT CERTIFICATE Proposed Plat of the South half of Tract 1421 VERA. REVIOUS ADDITION. T0: Ken Keto ~~o ~ o Pioneer Homes, Inc. E. 13701 Sprague Spokane, Washington Gentlemen: This is a certificate as of August 15th, 1978 at 8:00 A.M. for a plat of the following property: The South half of Tract 142, VERA, according to plat recorded in Volume "O" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington; EXCEPT the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. This company certifies that record title is vested in KENNETH R. KETO AND SUSAN A. KETO, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND WILLIAM V. HILLSTEAD, AN UNMARRIED MAN, AS 'IO THE SOUTH HALF OF TP.ACT 142, EXCEPT THE SOUTH 25 FEET OF THE EAST 321.91 FEET; AND EXCEPT THE NORTH 123.96 FEET OF THE EAST 159.2 FEET; AND FRED A. REVIOUS AND LUVENE J. REVIOUS, HUSEAND AND T•1IFE, AS TO THE REMAINDER, free from all liens, .encumbrances and objections, except as follows: l. Said premises lie within the boundaries of Vera Irrigation V District No. 15 and are subject to future assessment by said District. 2. Right of way for ditches and pipelines as provided for in contract to Vera Electric Water Company, dated April 25, 1908, recorded in Volume "H" of Contracts, Page 292. R . ECE IV E *CONTINUED* AU G 2 1 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AJftliated wtth Ftrst Amencan Title Insurance Company No. 21302 Pzige 2 3. TRANSMISSION LINE EASEMENT: Grantee: The United States of America and its assigns Purpose: right to enter and erect, maintain, repair, rebuild, operate, and patrol one line of electric power transmission structures and appurtenant signal lines including the right to erect such poles, transmission structures, wires, cables, and appurtenances as are necessary thereto, in, over, upon, and across Recorded: August 22, 1958 . Auditor's File No.: 558453B 4. MORTGAGE: Mortgagor: Kenneth R. Keto and Susan A. Keto, husband and wife, and William V. Hillstead, a single man V Mortgagee: Washington Trust Bank, a corporation Original Amount: $83,500.00 Dated: May 11, 1978 Recorded: May 18, 1978 Auditor's File No.: 7805180105 NOTES: 1. General Taxes for 1978 in the amounts of $365.29 and $103.03 are paid in full. Tax Account Nos.: 23544-0206 and 23544-0207 2. Irrigation Assessment of $38.00 by Vera Irrigation District No. 15 for 1978, is Paid in Full. 3. POWER OF ATTORNEY: From: Susan Keto To: Kenneth R. Keto Recorded: December 28, 1976 Auditor's File No.: 7612280326 FIRS~T.~AI,IERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY % • Larry D. Dunston Title Of ficer LD/gk _ rr- AGENDA, August 25, 1978 Telephone No. 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - Time: Friday, August 25, 1978 - 8:30 A.M. Flace: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor N. 721 Jefferson (at Broadway), Spokane 8:30 A.M. A. l. Planning Commission Concerns 2. Report on Commissioners' Actions 3. Other 6usiness Page B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIME l. PE-1011-76, SWAN ACRES FIRST ADDITION ZE- 59-76, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SWAN 1 2. PE-1026A-76 KENNEY'S SUBDIVISION #2 ZE- 78A-76 AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL KENyEY 2 3. PS-1118-77, SOUTH RIDGE VIEW 5th ADDITION ZS- 114-77, AGRICULTURAL to SiNGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SWARTOUT 3 4. PN-1129-77, FAIRWOOD CREST N0. 7 ZN- 136-77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL FARROIJ CONSTRUCTION COMPANy'........ 4 C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION - CHANGE OF COfVDITION 5. FF-1141-77, MOUNTAIN VIEW MEAD04JS ZE- 161-77, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SWANSON 5 D. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 6. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADOITION (cont'd from July 28, 1978 Comm. Hrg.) ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN KETO 6 7. PE-1216-78, MOLTER ADDITION ZE- 114-18, AGRICULTURAL & AGR.SUBURBAN to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRANSWESTERN REALTY 7 8. PE-1209-78, SOUTH ADAMS ADDITION ZE- 92-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE- AND TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL P1cKINLEY 8 12:00 Noon Lunch (Place to be announced at hearing) 1:30 P.M. Reconvene -over- AGENDA, August 25, 1978 TELEPHONE N0. 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TIME: Friday, August 26, 1978 - 8:30 A.M. PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor N. 721 Jefferson (at groadway), Spokane PRELIMINARY SUBDIUISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 6. PE-1204-78 REVIOUS ADDITION (continued from July 28, 1978 Commission hearing) ZE- 94-78 AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN a. Location: Section 23, Township 25N, Range 44 E.4J.M, Approximately 4 acres of land on South Sullivan Road. The South half of Tract 142, Vera, according to Plat recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. EXCEPT the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. b. Sponsor: Ken Keto E. 13701 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Surveyor: Gerald D. Masgai E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 4.63 acres e. Number of Lots: 15 lots f. Proposed Land Use Single Family Dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning: Agricultural Suburban i. Water Source: Vera Water and Power j. School District: Centrai Valiey #356 k. Method of Sewage Disposal Individual on-site systems 1. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. SP~Gu~ ~ruE . QFVioccs A00 . Q! c~.ner. ~ ..ue~ 2 V ~ w ~ r /6-A AvE ~ Q ~ 3 ~ -6- PE-1204-78 & ZE-94-78 In the Matter of a Hearing to consider the application of Ken Keto, E. 13701 Sprague, Spokane, Ulashington, to file a plat to be known as REVIOUS ADDITION. (Continued before the Spokane County Planning Commission from their hearing of July 28, 1978) Also to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Agricultural Suburban, on the property described below, such zone change to become effective only upon the filing of a final plat or plats of such property. The property being platted is described as: Sec. 23, T 25N, R 44 EWM, approx. 4 acres of land on S. Sullivan Rd. The S 1/2 of Tract 142, Vera, according to plat recorded in Vol. "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. EXCEPT the S 25' of the E 321.91'. (West of Sullivan Ave., approx. 320' S of 8th Ave.) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) A,~- T,~vo"<_00 ~_C, , betng flrst duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a cttizen of the UnEted States of America, and a restdent of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the i Ll day of ~'j , 19 -Z 4 I persona 11 y posted one (1) or more true and C-lorrect copies of he hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING in a conspicuous manner at each of the following tocations, to-vvtt: Z /j Sz-~ Qe . n 0 t,.,V,,_ 6AZE /1 J IA ~ c.J 3:3, P I) /o2ay e~b DA TE D THI S DAY O F 19 7,5( • ~ ~ SIGNED _ Subscribed and Sworn to before me this AM day of ,19?$ • c..i~~ < Notary Publtc tn and for the State of Washington, residing at Spokane, Washingtar SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT N 721 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 d3 W ~ ~ 1 R ECE IV E o L. M. Mc ~ Mullin 11920 E. Mansfield Spokane, WA. 99206 AUG 2 4 1918 E SPOKANE COUNTY ~ ~i•b~ ~ .:~tABLE ~ssED A~G ~ I ~ PLANNING DEPARTMENI '11t,1?i Vi~i i- o FoRwARO i373 ~ s-titf k~' ~ -s"Q SENUER l"'fu13h t:w4 ~ P+1` e 'L47.--•.9 ~JC. T• ~p. -13"': J 7 5 y' K~'' ^'tx' =';l~ -.`~E,trB i COUNTY SpOKpNE NT ~a AUG NNIN~ ~FPARTME ~ /9~ b pp p~ N 72} JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WA5HINGYON 99260 S Y -4- 0 CAY4.CW C~A1~ U~G S~ s 3$26 PIT~_Bq9203 SPGKAHE WA ~g z354~ Oq~ , C:=b pNG 21 p~ p M ~ ssEa %313 ti ` ~ ORw ~RO O 53k b 0 SE~DER !I - - _ , , , - _ - - - - • - - - r- SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT N 721 JEFFERSON SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 UiuUa9 ~ J/• ~ ~ ~ . , ~ . e V~ ~ . , • ~ V = ~ • ~ CA %~i . ~ ' ~ ( L ~•ti i yV ~ ~ ~Q i~ rCa1~1; inw~ ~ . wen„tiom Larry A. 1 son 18406 E. S MOVed, teft no ~ Gree es., W. 99016 o No sLsch num~-Aeb le ed, not fior~y~r.~r ~p ~ Mo ~ Addressee unknown AU G I 81978 ' SPOKSNE COUNTY PIANNING DEPARTMENT Kev nch inettuctfons , t Charge to : 5901 O1 / 59_O1 Q2/590: / 590302 G 9 col. 1 ia a quote mark (numeric "H" _ ~ . ~ ~ - ~ , ► ,~1 . o__ _ _ ~ ~ • , , co13. 2 - 4 ia conatant 11691"". - • ' ~ * ~ • ~r I I • ~ < < c ol3. 5 - 13 is miaeric wi th hlanka__ accr ptable . ~ c Do nct zero PiII. col. T~4 13 n c~uote me►rk (numeric "H'! r ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ Yi~~• ~ ~J, ~ q- ~6 3' , Identify and separate batches for computer room. Thi s j ob mus t be compl eted no" 1 ater than ' two ( 2) days after recei pt. ~~g ~~~y~~~ Forward data to the computer room for processing. ,/,-,a,o,~ ~ Return these sheets to the Plannina Depa'rtment 1 ~ . - 111~ u p o n c o m p l e t i o n of K e y p u n chin g; attention of: Plat Section/Zoning Section/Zoning Adjuster. ~ 9 IL (09 t i 11.67 YLY- A , G 9 ~,j,,,_, ~ • ' ! r '0 1 Codiri exam_ qlea 1 (09 1 Z ' $FC. r R. Q. 8LK,-!GT r .s~~11 ► 56,a; 3►a 6 9.11 3, 2► t i-4, 0 L Parcel number 32541-0801 on3y 1-4800 thru 32541-C804 9 i~ ~\`r - Or~,~~~ 5.21i4I i-p,~,p, , Farcel rru.mbera 3254 G 9 ~ i 1 ~ ~ - 6,~ I0, ~ . ? ~ ~ 4 ~ 81,T Parcei muabers 325.4I=C3800 thru 3254I-C89g ~ ~ ~ ~ ti._►_-~ IdS 1/4 0f aec. 32, twp, 25, rge. 44 ! 1'I _3254t A1T of eee. 32, tti+P. j 25, rge. 44 • , • - 6 9~ • 6X. J A 1l of txp. 25, rge . 1" ~ i _ . k~L,4t A12 of rge. 44 ~ Sect,fona vithin A3 ; Tovnehit! e ~ Li 061, 05 i 0 02 I Ol , • ' ~ 071 ~ 04 I0,I3112 L4 18~ 117 1 '1b I 15 I 14I 13 1 19~120l2i!22 12 Iu ~ ' ! 0 2 ! 8 ^ 6 2 . 331132 I 35 16 69 1 ' ~ (09 1~ ~ Qiarter eactions ~ 6 9~ ;vithia »ectfan . ; ~ i ► ~ _ ~ ~ 1 ~ , . , -._P 3 4 ~ Q i r , ~ ~ , '~►NL 1 !r CS i 1 t 1 i JC~&_~il~M~~~~u - L_~vcA L ~ E 5 C ~ P I ~ ~ I ~ _ _ _ JUH~ 19~~ P N CUN Y AL L~l~ F . ~ C~A E C 1" ~C~ ILE r~ ~ . P~1R '~i, ~o u~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ wu~a~k ~una~~ ~ss~~~~~ a~r~~~ ~~~a~ D~SC~,IPTIOt~ OF PR~+~'~~c~Y , ~~~c~~r~~~ / ~ 1 - ~ F~ ~ ,e ~ 1 , . KJ~ ' ~ } F~_.~ ~ ~ ~ B ~~~~o ~ ~ 2~z~~~~~t~ ~F ~ir~ o~ ~~~r~~~ ~r~r s~~ ~~s~~~ Z ~Z 04t~ 2b~~~1 ~ ~ 5 j iVi~1/4 ~ 1~3 8~~1~~SH i~~ ~ ~~a~a ~ I ~c r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~5~~-9 b 988 S H i~ Sb 4~5 4~+ ~b71.T5FT 0~ ~ ~TAM '~X~MPfiI 2 0~~ 5 C ~5 ~ ~ ~~9~~ 77FT Ur ~wil4 OF 5w1r4 ~XC ~ - ~~'~~►J~{~1~1 77t~~15~17~~' 1,AT3'~~ D~Y STS i~~~'C~I~~R~ A~~~ ~~ACY~ L~S CHUR~H ~ ~1 ~~v , 50 E NU~~W ~E'~P~.E r ~ ~,Qfi~ 5~~~ ~k~(~ CIT1~ ~1~' B$TS+~ ~ ~ti~.C~ _ ~1.A pTl ; ~ . 1~ t~'~ R~ ~~5~+~-U14~ 77~~ib7~35 G~~wAi.J L TCM~HA~ ~~TCNF~RG +ACR~ 7~AC~S c~ ~l~ G~T ~E~T~ l N'~ c~~ 1~+ ~ _ r~ ~P~ 5~ 4 ~ ~ L ~ 1 ~P 0~~ ~ ~ _ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 4 _ . ~ ~c ~ " F ~ A ~ ~ A T ' ~I ~45 3 C103 77~~1bG5~~ ,~~M C N~Y C~ T C S I~AS MUT S I~ ~ - , Q ~ l3 B~ ~74,~~ ~ ~ . r 7t ~454~-~C~l ~"7'~U~~6~36~ ,IIM ~ CI4~1~~~ ~~T~.H~~R~ ,~~~E T~,CCSS ~ARNEY JIM L ~ ` ~~s L1 Y 3 9~1i ~~c+ ~ hiA'~D~N LAitE I~ 83 ,5 _ , _ ~35~+~•Z~47✓~ 11~~9~?~C ~PIS ~i~CE~~ VERA $~~+1 4I5AC ~XC N~44FT CHllR~H H~LY SP~ ~ _ ~ ~RM~ R . ~ E ~ 5 T !1 L 3§ 1' Ff V ~ l 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ SPOKA~E '~A 9~~1b 4- ~~r 9~ G. -,1 K A W~~A +~1T5FT ~~4~ 1iAllAS GI~ST ~ ~ ~l~c~ ~ u~~r a~~ s ~ t~ ~x~ eo ~ Av~ - - - . - - v~~~~~~~ w~ ~ ~ ~,r~ r x N~ 23~~4~~,~ZO~ 441~G5C aLGA Md~~SII{ 'V~~II ~ll~ ~F 14Z ~?[C ~ _~5 ~~YI~I~~ ~R~'~ A ~l ~ G ~ : ~yt~ S~~F3 E32~.91rT Ct S 9~?~ S1lLLI'~~4N ~D ~ ~ ~ ~ $ 11~R A[~A ~ A ~l~ ~ ~ ~f ~ ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ 5'~ Q~ ~ ~ ~~~~~-~~~~r ~~L~~:~~ Lur~ u~R~ ~ir~ e~~►~ ~~c T~~ , tuT~~~t~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ x ~35~~~' ~ 8 ~ VrA~I ~ ~ " S ~ ~U~Li ~ Y~RAL~A~.€ ~~4 ~9037 : ~~~44-~~~~ ~~~~U~. c11~h~G LUT~1 1~t~A ~13~9~~ ~i~F N11~ ~JF LI~TH~RN CH ~f Q~ SII~' B 1 ~ 1~ ~ ~ 810 S~LLI AN U Y~R ~ L~ Yt '~'~~7 A ,4 A ~~4~i- ' 7~~~7 ~ M MU Tt~ . V RA H~ ~2 ~F 1~31`5 L G MU~ ~Ob ~ G~~2 ~ 1 ~ M ~ i~l ~ 1 ~N W11 4 _ ~~'~~t, ~ 8 ~ ~ ~i L ~ ~ ~ ~4~48 X p L HAf~Mf~ ' V~k 1I2 F~f 5 F LI1V ~I ~'b ~~5~44 v~~4 71~ A S ~I N ~ ~ , ~ ~l ~ .~r.~..~ ~ . 1 l ~ . 514 ~ ~ (D . _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~~~~~i`~~~~ ~~~`~~~~~~~t !S C'~7~t~~ ~L~~ ~ ~t~~ ~~fi ~ ~~Q ~ ~ ~ ~F~ ~~t~ ~ ~ Wl~fl 1 ~ _ -ti Y~ P ~ ~~~3~1~=L+~~~1 ~T~~~ 1~ ~~~Q W~J~~ ~ ~ $i4~ V~I ~H~ ~THE~. Y ~5fi ~ , ~ 0 5 ~I , 3'~ TH e ~ ~ ` ~4 S~~~TI,E ~i~ ~316~ fi. , i ~ - _ . ~3~44-~'~C 7 ~ 77~ ~ Yc ~i ~ ~ ~ I Y~~ • S l;+a 7~~ ° v i ; We~~t P IhES ~;t~LTY I ~ ~l~ ~SF~ 4~~ TH~ ~ 1f ~+~f TR 143 P~ 122 RA'~~IQ~ID R~ SPO~K~1l~E _ - ~ ~t ~~F t F T 1" H R~ E P S R E Y I 1~ ~3~44 C3t~~ 7~~[~~~~16 L~~Ai~R~h~ VE A wl 3 ~ N~ ~~l r ~X ~ ~246.7~FT OF ~N~ ~11~~FT T1~~ c1I2 ~F TR ~43 ~1 1~~2 RA1~M~N~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ S~"QK~N~ ~A ~ 94~~6 ~~1~~ ~ , ~~5~i~r-~3[?~' ~'~C~G~b814b PIt~~Y~S'~ I~~C ~ '~~R~ ~"u13~FT ~~cC fiHf GR~' N1~ S~~ --6 - 5 75~~' -X H ~T F 1`~f E 1 OF ~'R ~r~ , ~ ~ ~ ~r6 b ~2~ , ~ ~ C 'i ~ wl~ 0 ~ ~ ~ l 2~~ 2~5ti4-~G3~~Q"°f T9G~~75754 K~~~K~ J~'t~R~l~r~ V~R~+ ~1J~ ~OF TR l43 ~X ~WAR~~~ R~B~Rfi J ~ C _ . ~ g 7 T ~ ~ 3~ 9 6TFI V H E ~ 3~ # 5~ O F 1 3'~~ ~ a F S D ~ 1 1~ A E SPG~t+~N~ WA ~ 99~ I _ ~ - ~,~54~►-~3Q~ ~69~33t~A JO~IN ~AS~E~~ J~i V~RA Blb4 ~IW~T14 El(C l~45S~TT JC~N J J~ x ~ t 11l~~ I~~~li~~~d 513 F v~~n~~~~ r~~a ~~~~a - - , ~ ~ ~ ~~'~44y~a~t~4 7~'~~~bl~~~ ~'H~~1~5 C!~l1R~CK V~~E~~ ~F 5137 FI~ MU~' '~A 2 ~ ~ ,3 l ! 4 t b4 _ ~ I ~ ~~~~~~~~~~r ~~~-~c~~~~~ ~~a~ p ~r~ F~~ v~~a ~~~~T +w~►~ ~1~~ ~~r w~s~~.~~ . ~ - - _ ~ , ~ ! F ~ J 1354~-+~9c~t~ 5~97b~~C I~EM1E J Tt3Ll V~R~ N~B+~~'~ ~~Q ~~~1 I~l ~F t 4 S~~4 SULLIV"A~ ~D T~ l65 ~ S~S~T ~ 1 ~ TR ~ ~ ~ ~ - Y R 49 7 - ~ ~~a~~~ ~ra r ~~~~~-~go~ ~~o~i~~~Y~ c~~~~ ~ c~~~r~w ~~~a ~~iz o~ ~x~ cA~c.~~ c~~~~ ~ ~ _ E~~~ ~ ~x~ ~~~s~ n~ s~~~~ s ~~~s ~tYrs~+~~~ ~ ` SF~ItAN~ ~!A 94~~3 . 7( 23544-w9~~~ 7T40~6~#rB1 t~►~fil~ ~i~~G~~~.S V~RA ~11~ QF 3'R lb~ E~t~C -YAhtC~'~ ~'AUI~ ~ ~ 5:.~~ 19Q' ~ ~XC ~~,3~.'~~ OF ~1Q0' ~ ~~~~5 ~~"~H A ~ , y y VE~ A~~LE ~IA 99~~7 ~ I~. ~3~54~►~~~~1~' 7~D~168~7 WA~R~I~ N BC~~RT C~cA~G l~ 8~ SEAF~~ ~P , ~ ~T~~~ ~ ~ . _ ~ , 99 ~35~44~~4~~ 7~~G~~,~~~ JIMIMIE A'~A~~ C~A~G SU6 F~~ ~~,~FIi~'Sr ~~P , K 2 ~ c , - ~ - ! ~Z~5~4~--~~~3`~ 74~~~4G1~fv~J~l~ fi~~~u c~ , C~~IG 5~8 L~ B~ S'~E~1~~0~ kTS k . C~ ~ ° 1 ~ C~ ~'~~a 3~ Z~54~~C4~4`" ?5~1529~~16 .~.~IA~~ ~i ~~kB~~tT ~~AIG 51~~ l~r ~H~~~IC~i]D Rf~B~~~'S 1C ~~~5~ ~ , ~35~r~r-Z5Q1 ?~1~160~?b L H SM4~,I~~C~~?~ ~~AIG SU~ ~,1 SEAF~R ~CCR~ ~7~9 .5 . ~t~ ~ 1 7 ~ ~ ~~~~~-z~+~z~ ~~~~i~c~x2 ~~T ~,ax~~ ~~a s~~~t~s~r ~n~ ~ . ~ . . - 235~~r-i~~3 7'4Gb1~~i~0~ ~~L~ I~. T~~CK~~t CR~IG 5U~ ~3 TUCIt~R liliLE I~ ~t ~t - c_ S 1~2~ Sfi CHA~~.E 5~ R '~~E AGAL~ ~1~4 9~3 ~~54~i~Z5~4r 770(~1~~$7~ P~4114, ~ ~I~,~~t ~C~AIG ~~U~ L4 B~ ~AN~SHA~~~ ~TC ~ ~'1~~►~b l , ~~5~i4-~5~~~' 7~1~11f~~~ =.~iY J ~~MZEM ~~AIG S~1'~ L5 ~33 - _ ~~1~lAS N 0~ I~3'~ . ~ ~ ~l ~ . , - - - ~ ♦ _ ~ _ _ _ _ . „ ~ Z~Sa~-~9~1 f~RT ~li FEO SI'~ D4 Q3~ 23~tb t ~~~~0 51~t~ S 6~8 E~I~r C1 ~~~l~~Ob ~~'~~~y~0~~~ 1~~E~4fi~'~SE~ SIJ~ 7~ ~ 11~0 14 ~19$'~t1 ~i9~9~ T'~ 1 'S~r 6 ~ w ~~MMIC ~~~~"►1~~~~~'~~ " ~ ~ i ~1'~°~1 t~~ ~.°r.aw. ~ a ~ ~-r~~ *tf~•'~ ~ . ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~3?~1-~l~s~2 GR1' !i~ F~~1 ' ~ Of '~3~ #~~1a ~ +~~0 '468(~~ !S~~BDO ~ ~f~ ~E~'F'~ttY [T W~tl E I~'N~4'~S'~E~ ~t041635Z8 t~~iHESSEY SUI l~ ~ 115~ 1M~ 1i$'~53 1t895~ '~8 1 Y~ ~ r , ~ x~~ ~~o ~ 5EG ~b81~$ ~~~1~1~1 ~~5~1-~7;41 ~3~1~~~2~~ ~5'4t-~4'~ ~3~~41-~9'q3 ~I'T I~1 f~~ S~'l ~ 09 '035 ~3'd1~ T ~OQ~ ~~Q u~ E~Er~~~S~ ~~~oti3~~8 ~EM~~SEY S~ 11 ~1~~ fy~ ~ 6t8 ~E~tt~r tT 'Cg 7~ YR 5 RM 1~~' 04 65 1~ !87 LA ~4b5T ~N i21~63 ~~1t6~ 78 t SE6 ~681~~ tlilli F~ ~,~~41-~241 ~~~V1-~~4~ ~~5~1-~M~~ ~3~41-~90~ 6IlT t441 FEQ St~ Q9 ~}3'~ ~~1~ 5 ~OQD ~i~0 '~~00 ~ 7D~6 ~~1i~~R~ ~rt B 7~N~~ES~ST ~R~~~63'SZ8 I~EI~iESSEIf Sl~ l~ ~1 11~r0 ~~1~ 11~"953 ~~89~53 78 1 ~ ~~~G 768i~~ flillll~6 Fi~t ~3~3"~W1lZ341 ~~3~+1g~~~4~ ~3~+~i1-;~~~ It~l ~"1 Z35~~-~90~ 6 T whl f~~ S'~~ ~35~ ~3~2fl 3 ~i~t1 ~~f~0 5t~0A 5 7tr +~~rITII~Y CT - Y L 1~ ~a~10150? 29~ ~ I~M~ S~~ 7 SlA l5 ~ x~4 1~~08~~ 1~11~Z7 7~ i ~ ' ~ ~ 8 76 Y'R SZ ~'I~ 10 ~R t~~ ~tl ~6 iT~~ ~,~A ~~810 liS ',~1 ~1 1 ~J~~_ ~~s ~~e1~s ~~~ir~~ x~~a~-~~y ~~~t-~~~~ ~r~t ~~a s~~ ~ ~ a~~ ~~~r ~ o~~~a~ ~r~c~r '~RT h~41 f~4 ~t~, s D9 ~3~ ~3~2~ 1 04i~~~ 179~11 ~~~~1-~~n~ ~~t ~u s~~ o~ az~ ~~s~~~ ~~~oa ~iooo ~ 7~a ~~~ru~r t~ -~n ~ N~r~~ss~ ..rra~~~~~e r~h~ s~~ ~u~ ~ ~t~a f~c~ ~~~a~ rs r : . ~e r6 Y~ ~ ~n ~ Q e~t ar tt~~ ~ ~ t~ ~,~~~"~"~,v~~ ~~~1~$ ~ f#~ 23541-~~4t 1a5~11•~~M2 235~11-Z245 ~ ~,~R T N~) ~ ~ EO St 09 ~~5 ~3~2~ 9 t9~1?'~'S 17'~~ ~~~•~'9~OF G T H~1 F~0 ` ~9!J 035 ~3$~t~ ~ ~4~0 ~6~~ S ~"19 ~~Elt~~it ~T ' ~ _ T ~~]r ~p 01.54M/~ O~t ~'j,( 3 ~EMp1~S~yS~Y SUI r7 Ba1 I, j]~ ~+~68 $'~4i~8 7~ 1 ~~~Tt ~ 1~ ~MI r~! ~ 1~ ~R 1~ f~ ~~~1~~f1 ~~IN~ YY ~ ' S~6 ~'~Bt3A Q~1 b~ fR g3~~l~i~~~ ~35~t-?~+~~ ~'~~4l-~~5 - ~r a~~-~~a~ ~u ~~a s~ a~ a~ 2~~~~ ~ ~~o ~~~o s ~~~rc~~ c~ Wll1, i#~1' II N~t ~~~!b3~3Q 'N~1~~SEY 51,~ 1 li I1~Q 14~ $'~'~i~ 1 YB Tb Y~R ~M f0 i~ ~~1 If~ 6~~ iA l7~~ LA 114(~~ l~ 2M s~~ r~s~~~ OI4~+t~J"?i fR ~~~~~-2~~i ~~t•z~~~ ~ Z3~541•'~9~9 ~4! ~f~~ ~6~ 0~ ?~8~4 ~ ~1~5~ 3b5~ 5 703 ~E'~1'111~Y ~L; r~ ~#~~~~s~~ ~~~~~~n ~~~~~~~t~~~ ~t~~~ t~ ~~a ~w~~ i s~~ r~st~~ ~~~1. ~6 ~3~a~-~2~~ ~~~a-~~~►2 ~3~~1{~t~5 ~~s~~~eufia~~s ~ ~ 1~~~~ ~v~ s~~~ ~ ~x~~~ ' ~~~e ~ ~ ~ ~ oo~ ~c~c~~~~~ ~ ~~o~ ~n ~ ~2~ ~ ~EG~~~B~~~~1~1~ ~~R1~I~I5~t~~w~~~3~4~1~~'~w~ 33~1-~48 ~w '~$'~~t 3 58~4 ~ TlU3 ~31 ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~a, r,+~„~ ~ ~ ~r~a ~arrar~~w ~oM"~ u~ro r~ ww~e , +OOw ~t ~1 wN~ r+u ~ w ~MA~1 +~r rr ~ q ~ ~TR I BtI~Q~RS ~~+C ' ~ 1'~ ~ ~ ~ ~~11'~ ~~t~ ~35~41-3~~ 6Y~,RS ~4t~1A'1 ` ~3701 ~PRAGkI!~ A1V I~A ~~O~i i~0~ ~t~10 ~ a~~ ~~a~ a1~~ fo~ r~R ~ la e ~~6 ~~~22~ ~ l F~ 2~~~1-G~4~ ~~5~r~-~743 ~3~~1i~~~~ ~4 ~3~►i ~3~i i a~ st~ ~ ~~1~~~ ~ ~~~fl~ ~~~~~u~ ~u~ ~R~~ ~ 3l~~ o~a~ r~ ~z~o~ ~a~~-~o~~ r~r~~~ ~ ~~1' ar~~s ~a~sT~u+c~fo~ ~o ~ i~~c~ R~ i~ ~~~o ~~o s~p~~~~ ~~M r~ i C~4R~iE A f4~+if i'~~~ ~5~~~ f~IffiE~' p0~ ~3 ~t ~EG zr~~~~ s~,~~~a ~ ~3~4i-~~~ ~3+~a-orr~~ ~35~~-~T~~ DI S1~ 16UT4~~ 1M~4 E t~?09 ~P~AG~ R~IE R~ f~A !!21 ~ Q3Q1 T~ IT10'~ 23'Sk1-~OS~ I~ERS J4WN ~ ~ E 1~~01 ~N~~AGIIf AW~ ~~4~ 4iA +~~~1 ~r,~,~ ~ ~EG 7~8~~~~~10~t~ ~~F~~~~~~~~~~~9~~~3~1~~~~3 t3'~~1•0~~'~ 6'~~~ ~r~~►~ ~ 1 1~~ 1- ~t~'~~ F ~~~1 I ~ ~ ~`EARDAM~ 1~ ~~i~ S ~0~ iUl~'S I~ ~lR~1~ F~.EnI~iG ~`'~~~59~5N ~t?~l1fE~ ~1~~ l~ 1l It'S~ 1M~ ~~i ~ T '~i4 l~~~ ~l: 5EG 7~~~26 f01i~'/~'T f~ ~~541°4~4~ ~~~M~1~~~"M] ~3'~4~-RlT~►~ 2~'~i~~p~(r Si~lll"11Q~ LE~1`ER ~ E 1~~1~'~ ~~fi~l ~pVE S~~ ~ ~'~~1 ~~0 ~~IA ~ 15d11 ~ ~IVE f~'ESTER SCHf1~D1 77~~Q~5lM~3 'f~~lTE~ A~ 11 ~t~0 ~~~k ~'3~T ~ ~I~` ~t~~~ I~+t~ . _ ~ ~7~7~~, t~r1~'~°~~ _ ~`~t~.~~ ~~LRR~~~ ~~~L~ ~ s ~ STAFF FINDINCS - July 28, 1978 PE-1204-78 - Revious Addition ZE- 94-78 - Aqricultural to Agricultural/Suburban PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 1. GENERAL INFORMATION: A. Location ✓-~South Central Ualley location adjacent to and west of Sullivan Road approximately 320 feet south of Sth Avenue. B. Proposal ' Subdivision of acres int . lots for single family dwellings. w---Typical lot fron age = 80 feet. ,jTypical lot size = 9,796 to 11,771 square feet. -P De crs-i/40~~~~uen~:~t~-s-~p~e►_r.~g~ro~Ys~a~c~re_~= - C. Relationship to the Comprehensive Plan °,'-Approved map of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage with no density designated. • ~,--Surrounding area is also designated as residential on the Comprehensive Plan. D. Existing Land Uses -,---West of Sullivan Road, within a quarter mile of the proposed site, the land uses are residential, with similar densities occurring in subdivisions to the south. -5~-Directly across Sullivan Road to the east is Central Valley Nigh School and playfield with presently vacant land further east. ✓-There are no significant topographic features associated with the site. E. Compatibility with Existing Land Uses L/-The proposed preliminary plat appears to be compatible with the existing ldnd use in the area. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION: A. Circulation ~The County Engineer has examined the proposed plat and basically approves the ,road system proposed. ~-Engineer recommends the dedication of 10 feet additional right-of-way along ' Sullivan Road; and further requests no direct access to Sullivan Road from lots in the plat. -With regard to the dedication of 10 feet of additional right-of-way (above), that a release from utility cornpany easement should be secured. - 2A - T 3 zz) (Con±'d.) PE /ab4 r T . - ' . 1✓ ` FINDINGS - July 28, 1978 Revious Addition 1. SPECIAL INFORMATION: - cont'd. B. Sewage Disposal -The applicant has analyzed sewage alternatives, and his report is in the offi- cial file for the plat. The sewerage alternatives examined: on-site septic tanks; community septic tank; and community package treatment plant. The Con- sulting Engineer's report concludes that on-site septic tanks should be allowed and are the most economically realistic alternative. -Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the preliminary plat. The District also states that an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 15 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. The Health District also requires a public water system, including fire flows, to serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer; ~ and the Health District, in their examination of the possible impact on ground- water quality resulting from this proposal, have the following comments: Impact discussion: \S /~3 L~ / a. The plat sponsor has proposed ~ lots on,4,.,-M acres. Each lot is to be served by a public arater system and its individual on-site sewage disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. / b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban deveiopment in the Spokane River Valley upon the yuality of the groundwater. In summary;, he concluded that: ✓(1) In normal precipitation years,subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. ✓(2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the ground- water. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, wnich are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots" will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. L/(3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/l. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background." ....."The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when com- pared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume , and dissolved solids concentration, indicate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." -2B- r~..r,~ , . , . - a - FINDIPdGS - July 28, 1978 Revious Addition Impact discussion - cont'd. /c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 0.52 to 2.22 ppm. A projected incremental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges of .56 ppm. to 2.41 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppni. d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that would not recharge the groundwater have the following general characteristics: ~(1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to surface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently econoiTiically available for this project. - (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Sorie, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. C. Drainage ,--The site is relatively flat and on-site drainage facilities will adequately handle surface water. CO-Standard techniques for stormwater control should be incorporated into the street and road improvements alith plans approved prior to final plat. D. Water Supply -Proposed Preliminary plat is located within the boundaries of the Vera Water and Power District. ~-The District advises they can provide adequate water to the project. E. Fire Protection --Situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protection District #l. -Both mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire protection should be included as a condition of approval, as determined by the Fire District. F. Schools 4Proposal lies within the boundaries of Central Valley School District #365. ,/-The proposed plat is located directly across the street and to the west of Central Valley High School. ./-The District facilities are close to capacity levels. G Parks ► (Dhere are no parks in the imriiediate vicinity of the project. j -The report, "Planning for Parks," (revised 1976), locates a proposed park adjacent to the school site and approximately 1/4 mile to the east of the proposed plat. H. Unique Environmental Features - None have been identified in the inventory. I. t.Cultural Resources - None have been identified through the Spokane County Cultural Resources Survey. ~ , - ZC - r, , FINDINGS: July 28, 1978 Revious Addition I I I. ZONI NG ANAL YS I S: ✓-Pending approval o-i the final plat, it would be appropriate to reclassify the zoning to Agricultural-Suburban. ✓-Land to the east past Central Valley High School is zoned Agricultural with Agricultural-Suburban designation occurring to the southwest. ,,=Generally, the zoning within 112 mile of the site is Agricultural and Agricul- tural-Suburban with some single family use occurring west of Sullivan Road. Commercial zoning exists on most of the land adjacent to Sprague Avenue. I V. EI;V I RONMENTAL REV I EVI: ,/-Environmental checklist submitted by the sponsor has been reviewed. i-No significant adverse environmental impacts were identified. i-Slight adverse environmental impacts were identified from the checklist in the following categories: Earth; Air; Water; Flora; Noise; Light and Glare; Land ~ Use; Population; Irlousing; Transportation/Circulation; Public Services; and Utilities. -/-Tne Staff Iias issued, through the Planning Director, a proposed Declaration of Non-Significance; and it is currently circulating to other agencies of juris- diction. V. CONDITIONS : -If approval is granted, the Staff recommends the following: -Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard Conditions for Approval of Preliminary Plats," August l, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department. -NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated spearately and listed below: sEA~7. &---P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4, P-5, P-G, P-7, P-8, P-9 (3x~ 1, 1979) P-13. ~/-E-1, E-2, E-3, E-4, E-5, E-6 u/-A-1 /-That the provisions of SPEA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Eoard of County Comrnissioner's Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicanLL witiiin triirty (30) days of formal acl:ion by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the preliminary plat approval, as instruc- ted by the Planniii~ Department Staff. /-That a oubl i c wa -Ler system, servi ced by the Vera bJater and Power Di stri ct, including fire f loti•is, serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. ,/-That final construction plans for on-site storiii drainage facilities be reviewed and approved prior to filing of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer. v-That upon filiny of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to Agricultural- Suburban. -2D- (cont°q,) , . . ~ - ~ -Y FIPJDII"fGS - Jul"y 28, 1978 Revious Addition V. CONDITIONS - cont'd. 4.-,'-That the Pl anni ng Coiimii ss i on susta i n the i ssuance of a proposed Decl arati on of Non-Significance aiid recommends issuance of a final Declaration of Non- Significance. v-That the project sporisor may not be notified by the Planning Department of the need to request an extension of time for the renewal of any preliminary plat approval grantecl by c;ie Board of County Coinmi ssi oners . ~-That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. (36 foot ' paved section curb to curb; curb on Sullivan Road to 24 feet from the center line.) L---That dedication of 10 feet additional right-of-way along Sullivan Road be achieved by a release from the utility company easement. -That no direct access to Sullivan Road from lots in the plat be permitted. _ 2E ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNINACOMMISSION HEARINGOF AUGUST 25, 1978 Agenda Item D-6 - PE-1204-78 - REVIOUS ADDITION List of names of those appearing in opposition to the plat. Agnes Helling, 1824 South Adams Road (Tape III, side 1) 9 2-j 20 ( D v ~ oj:=-- c-0 ~ . T- 1 r r r= ~ o Av O~T I 3 OJ Dc, S ANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Communication Date August 8, 1978 T0: Spokane County ~P~ing ~ 'ssion FROM: Dennis Krolr a~d Gene ather SU3JECT: Proposed preliminary Plat - Revious Addition 1. References a. Our memo to you, subject as above, dated 4/13/78. b. Map of subject by Senske and Masgai, scale 1"=50', undated (received by Health District on 8/4/78). 2. Redesign of the plat requires no change in our recommendation except that ; the number of dwelling units authorized without an on-s3 tje~ ~eWage~m~~,ge- ment system is now~5! , cc: Senske -and Masgai ~ i , , ~T;`.1 U SCHD-ADNi-030 • ! ; fy rMA• I~~f: ~ i t l t, . . . , , • , _ N0. 78 ~L~~ , . aEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUN7Y, WA.SHINGTON • , IN THE MATTER OF TNE RECOMMENDATtONS FROM ) ' , , THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION } RESOLUTION ° CONCERNING THE COMMISSION'S AGENDA DATED ) . , JULY 282 1978. WHEREAS, Tfie Board of County Coiimiissioners of Spokane County, pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Code of Washington, Section 36.70.620, shall upon receipt of any recom- mended official-control or amendment thereto, at its next regular public meeting set the date for a public meeting where it may, by ordinance, adopt or reject the offici,al control or amendment; and WNEREAS, the Board of County Con*miissioners of Spokane County, did by Resolution No. 78 1040 acknowledge receipt of the recornmendations.from the Spokane County Planning Commission concerning its Agenda, dated July 28, 1978; and ' WHEREAS, the Board of County Corimissioners of Spokane County, did by Said resolution set this lOth day of August to consider the recornnendations of the Planning Comnission con- cerning its July 28, 1978 Agenda, a copy of said recomnendations are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the Board of County Corrniissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that based upon the inforination available to the Board and the testimony at this meeting, the following action was taken: A. l. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO APPLiCA- TION REQUIREMENTS FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS: The Board took no action on the proposed amendments, as they continued considera- tion of the matter until their next regular Nearing date of August 17. 6 l. PE- 890-73 - PAINTED NILLS 5th ADDITION (Rev.) (proposed Painted Hills 3rd Add.) ZE- 26-73 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - Reed Haviny received a corruiiunication in disagreement with the Planning Commission's recormiendation for Appr al _,Qf an Extension f Time, wi th ded condi tions, the Board set a date of Gat of said day to further consider the i»atter. C 2. PE-1204-78 -_BE11 I OU5 AI7n r T i ON - Ketu ( cont i nued f rom June 30, 1978) ZE- 94-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planniny Coiirmission's recomnendation to continue this preliminary plat Nroposal to the Cornmission hearing of August 25, 1978. 3. PE-1210-78 - FIELOS ADUITION TO OTIS ORCNARDS - Transwestern Realty ZE- 88-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planniny Commission's reco►nmendation to deny the the request for this I.rEliiiiinary plat application, for the reason as stated in the minutes of the Planning Commission hearing. 4. PE-1179-78 - NORTNCREST ADDITIUN - Wolfland ZE- 44-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEN7IAL The Board concurred with the Planning Coiiunission's recornmiendation to continue this plat Nroposal to a special meeting on Septeiiiber 22, 1978. • i' ` '►.1, ' p ' ~'.1=i ~ °14~ ~t r_ ' • ` , ' , i .n~ . I 1. ' 0 5. PE-1211-78 - LESLYE FIHST AUDITION - Teeter • .-,ZE- 91-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN . • , ~ The Board concurred wi th the Pl anni ny Coiiu»i ss i on' s' recoirnienda,ti on to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained i'n the minvtes qf' the Planning Coniiiission's hearing with consideration of the environmental, review. . , . The Board also concurred with the Planning Com»ission's recommendation to zone ' the property to the Ayri cul tural Suburban' zone cl ass i f i cati on upon the f.i 1 i ng", of the final pla~. The Board took no action on,the.resolutipn and,map pendin,g, w the filing of the final plat. . • . 6. PE-1212-78 - aLUE SKIES - Schrnitt (no zone chanye requested) ' . , . r lanr~in, Cgmmi$s n's, , Having received a conmunication in disagreement with t P / -c.~ . ecoiimiendation for denial, the Board set a date of at oof said day to further consider th matter. . 7. PE-1213-78 - SYKE'S REPLAT TO ANCHOR SECURITIES - Sykes ZE- 107-78 - AGRICULTURaL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's reconinendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. , The Board also concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to zone-the property to the Single Faiiiily Residential zone classification upon the fil'ing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. 8. PE-1214-78 - MARTINSON'S ADUITION TO EAST FARMS IRRIGATED TRACTS - Martinson ZE- 106-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planniny Coinrnission's recommendation to approve the preliiiiinary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Commissions's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Planning Coiiunission's recomrnendation to zone the property to the Single Faniily Residential zone classification upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending , the filing of the final plat. ; 9. PE-1215-78 - NEIMAN'S AUOITOON - Crick & Associates ZE- 108-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred wi th the Pl anni ng Cornrni ss i on' s recoirmendati on to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Continission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concurred with the Planning Coiiimission's recoiTUnendation to zone the property to the Single Faniily Residential zo►ie cldssificati.on upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. BE IT FURTNER RESOLVED That the Board hereby authorizes its chainnan to sign Findl Declarations of Non-Significance for each item approved above, subject to compliance with the Spokane County Environiriental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15.340. BY THE ORDER, OF THE BUARD TH I S le~ DAY OF • , 1978. BOAkD OF COUNTY COMMISSIUNERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASITYNGTON NRRRY M. LARNED, CHM. ~,Y W. ~H~iISTENSEN Ai TEST : vEEZNor~ w. OF~LaND R Clerk of the Baard --t~,-RRY -C;IOPET by , -~~i-~`-•-~.c..L ' ~.._..s..~~~_~ . ~ Uepu ty • , SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 July 31, 1978 Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House Spokane, WA. 99260 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, July 28, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 12:10 P.M. reconvening at 1:30 P.M. to 3:50 P.h1., in the Broadway Centre Building, the enclosed action was taken and is recommended to the Board of County Commissioners. Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, and the Messrs. Culler, Kennedy, Main, Quigley and Thomas. Planning staff present: Hubbard, Frankovic, Litt, Johnson, Davis, Wesche and Blanchard. Engineer's Office: Kennaly. Health District: Prather. Prosecutor`s Office: Emacio. Sincerely, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ~ c " Ted cCoury, Chairman z, 1red. tT L. Day h, P1 a i-ng Di rector McC/D/myb Offi cial minutes and record of action taken by.the Spokane County Planning Commission at their regular hearing held on July 28, 1978. , } ' . PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING MINUTES July 28, 1978 B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS Ted McCoury, Chairman of the Planning Commission, announced this portion of the Hearing would address itself to presentation by Wally Hubbard, Plat Administrator, and each plat sponsor or his representative, of the preliminary subdivisions and zone reclassifications; followed by favorable and/or opposing testimony from the audience, with rebuttal allowed the sponsor. Mr. McCoury announced the Agenda items in order. l. PE- 890-73,PAINTED HILLS 5th ADDITION (Revised) (proposed Painted Hills 3rd Add.) for an EXTENSION OF TIME, by Reed, and ZE- 26-73, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the Extension of Time be APPROVED, with the provision that all standards will apply as though the plat were being approved today for the first time; i.e., updating curbing, paving and utilities. (Motion to approve by Thomas, seconded by Kennedy. Motion carried with five "yes" votes and one "no" vote. Mrs. Byrne abstained because she did not hear all the testimony.) C. Z. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION by Keto: (cont'd. from June 30, 1978) and ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the proposed preliminary plat be COPJTIiJUED for 'Lhirty (30) days. Reasons mentioned were zoning, dedication of right of ways, possibility of short plat violation, and legal description. (Motion to continue by Quigley, seconded by Byrne. Motion carried with five "yes" votes and two "no" votes.) 3. PE-1210-78, FIELDS ADDITION TO OTIS ORCHARDS by Transwestern Realty, and ZE- 88-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be DENIED. Reason given was the density is not compatible with the surrounding area. There was considerable opposing testimony. (Motion to approve by Byrne, with the understanding she would vote against the motion; seconded by Kennedy, for the purpose of getting the motion on the floor. Motion was lost with six "no" votes, and one member abstaining.) 4. PE-1179-789 NORTHCREST ADDITION by Wolfland, Inc., and ZE- 44-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEiVTIAL: That the proposed preliminary plat request be CONTINUED to a special meeting on September 22, 1978. An Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed preliminary plat was presented to the Commission just prior to the hearing. It was not pre- pared at the request of the Planning Corrmission; but was proposed by the sponsor, Vince Seipp, who asked for a public hearing. An original motion to continue for one month, and the second to that motion were withdrawn. (Motion to continue PE-1179-78 to a special meeting on September 22, 1978, to consider this matter, as well as other matters that come properly before the Commission at that time, was made by Thomas, seconded by Byrne. Vote to continue was unanimous.) - 4 - `.4 • . ♦ PLANNING COMMISSIOPJ HEARING MINUTES July 28, 1978 (Discussion Items - cont'd.) 2) Report on Commissioners' Actions Pat Frankovic, Assistant Plat Administrator gave the following reports. a) Appeals resultinq from Planninq Commission Hearing of June 30, 1978. PE-1202-78, Mission Ridge First Addition - subdivision of 11.6 acres into 26 duplex lots and 7 four-plex lots. The proposed zone change is from Agriculturai to Two-Family Residential and Multiple Family Subur- ban. The recommendation was to approve. PE-1196-78, Simpson's 2nd Addition - subdivision of 6.1 acres into 14 lots vritn zone change from Agricultural to Single Family Residential. Recommended aporoval. PN-1203-78, Horseshoe Bluff - subdivision of 31.3 acres into 83 lots with zone change from Agricultural to Singie Family Residential. Recommended denial. b) Report on Board of Count,y Commissioners' ,4ppeal Nearings by Frankovic PE-1188-78, Pace Addition - 6.8 acres into 20 lots, with a proposed zone change from Agricultural to Single Family Residential. This property is located north of 'rlellesley, east of Forker Road, and west of Bannen Road. The Planning Commission's approval was for a lot density of 10,000 sq. ft. per lot. The 6oard attached the requirement that the minimum density would be 14,500 sq. ft., with the preference that the lot size would be typically 15,000 sq. ft. PN-1189-78, North Park Industrial Addition - 18 acres to be subdivided i nto 15 1 ots , north of Hawthorne Road and east of the Newport Hi ghway , from Manufacturing to Restricted Industrial. Approval was given for the installation of a public sewer system. The Board upheld the Com- mission's decision; however, authorized the use of on-site disposal system with dryland connections. 3) Other Business a) Adoption b,y the 6oard of County Commissioners of tne Hear'lng cxaminer Ordinance Tom Davis of the staff reported that the Board of County Commissioners had adopted the Hearing Examiner Ordinance on July 27, 1978. Two minor changes were made by the Board in the text of the Ordinance - one change being that the Subdivision Hearing Committee may also hear zoning changes in connection with plats. A statement was also included that the Hearing Examiner Committee may either deny or deny without prejudice if the submitted plans are not suitable in making a decision. It would be necessary for the Committee to state reasons for the denial. The Hearing Examiner Ordinance is to become effective August l, 1978. Mr. Davis explained that the staff is going to have to prepare procedures and will meet with the Chairman to work this out. Mr. Kennedy stated that the entire Commission must be involved in establishing procedures and requested that aworkshop session be held for this purpose. Mr. Quigiey requested that a check-off list be provided to the Commission for clarity as to each item which is being considered. - 3 - , ~ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 0 , OR PRELIMINARY ~VISION 79 ACTION TAKEN ;2,,Vj ~79 APPROVE , - DENY CONTINUE LEIVGTH OF CONTINUANCE 30 REASONS 1, r . . ' ~ 2. 3. . ~ _ , - 4. CONDTIONS Subject Lo the Conditions as contained in the Planning Staff' s Finding s, Date d , and subject to the additional conditions that 1. 2. ~ 3. . VOTE Motion by Seconded by ~ VOTE YES 15- r30 v-~ ~ i , Legal Description For Pioneer Homes Job Number 1212 l... August 3, 1978 Section 23, Township 25, Range 44, E.W.M. approximately 4 acres of land on South Sullivan Road. The South half of Tract 142, Uera, according to plat recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. Except the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. , ~ , ~ ' t5 6 ~ ~ AGENDA, July 28, 1978 Telephone: 456 2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: Friday, July 28, 1978 - 8:30 A.M. Place: Sroadway Centre Quilding, Second Floor West 1201 Broadway, Spokane (Address also. known as N. 721 Jefferson) 8:30 A.M. A. 1. Planning Commission Concerns 2. Report on Commissioners' Actions 3. Other Business . Page B. PRELIMIiVARY SUBDIVISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIPr1E l. PE- 890-73, PAIPdTED HILLS 5th ADDITION (Revised) (formerly Painted Hills 3rd Addition) ZE- 26-73, AGRICULTURAL to SIPJGLE FAh1ILY RESIDENTIAL REED 1 C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOIVS 2. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION (continued from June 30, 1978 Hearing) ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL KETO 2 3. PE-1210-78, FIELDS ADDITIOPJ TO OTIS ORCHARDS (cont'd from U'une 30 Hearing) ZE- 88-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAh1ILY RESIDENTIAL TRANSUJESTERN REALTY 3 4. PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITION ZE- 44-78, AGRICULTUP,AL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WOLFLAND, INC 4 12:00 Noon Lunch (Place to be announced at hearing) 1:30 P.M. D. PRELIMIPJARY SU6DIVISIOfdS AND ZOfJE RECLASSIFICATIOfdS 5. PE-1211-78, LESLYE FIRST ADDITION ZE- 91-78, AGRICULTURAL tc AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TEtTE4 5 6. PE-1212-78, BLUE SKIES AGRICULTURAL - no change SCHMITT 6 , 7. PE-1213-78, SYKE'S REPLAT TO ANCHOR SECURITIES ZE- 107-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SYKES 7 -over- 7, C~~ ~ r r AGENDA, July 28, 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION D. PRELIMIPJARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS Page 8. PE-1214-78, MARTINSON'S ADDITION TO EAST FARPIS IRRIGATED TRACTS ZE- 106-78, AGRiCULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESiDErdTIAL MARTINSON 8 9. PE-1215-78, NEIMAN'S ADDITION ZE- 108-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL CRICK AND ASSOCIATES 9 . 5:00 P.M. ADJOURN 4 i i AGEP•lDA, July 28, 1978 _ TELEPHONE y0: 456 2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TIh1E: July 28, 1978 (Friday) 8:30 A.M. PLACE: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor; West 1201 aroadway, Spokane (Address also known as N. 721 Jefferson) PRELIMINARY SU60IVISIOPJ AND ZflNE RECLASSIFICATION 2. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADJITIOti - (continued from June 30, 1978 Hearing) ZE- 94-789 AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a. l.ocation: Section 23, Township 25, Range 44, E.W.M. Approximately 4 Acres of Land on South Sullivan Rd. The South half of Tract 142, Vera, according to plat recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. Except the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. b. Sponsor: Ken iCeto . E.13701 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Surveyor: Gerald D. Masgai E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 5.5+ acres e. Number of Lots : - 16 1 ots .f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings g. Exi s ti ng Zoni ng: Agri cul tural h. Proposed Zoning Single Family Residential i. Water Source: Vera j. School Oistrict: Central Valley #356 k. Method of Sewage Oisposal Individual on-site systems l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. ryo ~ _ - - - - St m ~ s 1.r o ^1 ' ` ~t q ~.o i C ti+arl 4L • ` ~ ~ ~ . g T,. A .4IE ~ s w 6 . 7 T,, 'A► CAtv1. ~ T„ ~ ~ntrg :V4i i eY ~ f . ; _ ~ • .Fl;,. i :e~~ = tcK. . . Q IGNT ~ AvE _ • 3 , - ~ - . , - r' .y , t i ~'f'a : c:v: ? ~ ~ ~ :N: ~:G`H'.. . i ; Vf~ ~ _ . ,o ooo' N y~I T/d ~w yI i av~ • r 0 I ~ ac r W ~ T ~N t..F 1 r~ ~r, p ~ t ` ~ ^`aV a `,~c ~ AYE ~ ~r+ 3 T11 I f' 31 ~ ' ~ D , age 2 ~ EENTN ~---•.o ' 14 TM `11 4vE ~ ~~j ~oZO~ c' C 1 ~ C ~ ~ 1w ~ ~ y' ! ! ~ aWrl . YAGcidDA, July 28, 1978 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TI July 28, 1978 (Friday) 8:30 A.M. PLaC • 6roadway Centre 81 dg Second F1 oor ,W. 1201 Broadwa"y, Spokane (Address is also known as N. 721 Jefferson) / I PRELI`~INA SUBDIVISION aN0 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - EXTENSION OF TIME/-6 August l, 1979 i. PE-890-7~3`,~ PAINTED HILLS 5th ADDITION (Revised) (formerly Pa' ted Nills 3rd Add.) ZE- 26-73,\ AGRiCULTURAL to SINGL8 FAh1ILY RESIOENTIAI. a. Locati on Sect. 3& 4, Towns p 24N., Range 44, E.W.M. A portion of Gov' Lot 9, Sect. 3 and portion ' of Gov't Lo 10, Sect. 4, described as follows: Commencing at the yW corner of Lot 3, Block Painted HiTls 2nd Add.; thence 53.17' to the true POB; thence id 510'; thence 640E, 280`; thence N 790 E 1b thence S 830 E, 180'; thence N 880 E, 110' to point on the Wly line of ot 4, Block 4, Painted Hills Ist Add ; thence S 1 y a 1 o g sai dWl y 1 i ne 120' the NW corner, Lot 1, El oc;c 5, Painted Hi11s 2nd Ad • thence Sly and !dlN along the Nly boundary line of Painted Hills 2nd Add. as per at thereof reco ded in the Auditor's office of Spokane County, bJashi ngton , to t true POB. b. Sponsor Fr k Reed H yden Lake, Idaho c. Engineer: arry Leinweber E. 13411 % Sprague o kane , WA. 99206 d. Site Siie: 9. Acres e. yumber of lots 18 Lots f. Land Use Proposed by Spo or Sing Family Owellings g. Exlsting Zoning: Agricu ura1, established Apri1 11, 1967 h. Proposed Zoning: Single ily Residential i. Water Source 'rJashington 'Water Power j. School District: Central Val Y ;1356 k. Method of Se.vage sposal Pub1 ic Sewe.r stem l. Preliminary Plat given conditional approval to ruary l, 1974 M. ExLensi on of ti e granted to ilarch i, 1975 n. Requestin4 ex ension of tim2 to Auaust 1, 1979 ~a - 1 - o~a~,E CpGyJ, ' - y rr ` SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Offi ce Communi cati on Date: July 19, 1978 T0: Spokane County Planning Commission FROM: Eugene C. Prather, R.S. ~ar SUBJECT: Proposed preliminary plat - REVIOUS ADDITION 1. Ref erences : a. Our memo to you, subject as above, 4/13/78. b. Map of subject, by Senske and Masgai, scale 1" = 50', undated (received by Health District 7/18/78). 2. Redesign of the plat requires no change in our recommendation except that the number of dwelling units authorized without an on-site sewage management system is reduced to 15. sm cc': Senske and Masgai ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~KaHE G~~ ~M~N~ SP~1N~ p~Pa zd . ~2.~ SCHD-ADM-118 OF COLJNTY EN~'~'INEER SIOKANE COUNYY, WASHINGTON J vu-1 L~ Date ~ ~g 7t Inte►-ofHce Con+municotion iQ P GANNI NG COl4R S S ION _ from GAay KENt+1Ai,y . pLANNING 6 TFtAFPIC DIVISION ENGINEEEt Sv6~wt ROAD CONDIT IQNS *Fw IPE 0••04. (ZevtouS broDrup#4 *GONpITIONS CIRCLED APPLY TO PLAT UNDER CONSIDERATION ~ thst conditional approval of the plat is givaa eubject to dedication oF ~ght of Llay to the public and approval of the road systea ia the plat by the County Lnginoer- . > hae plans, proFiles, and cros9 aections showing propo9ed street centerlfne and curb grades be aubroitted to [he County Engineer for approval prior to construction and the filiag of a final plat; • . . ~D3 that drainage plan9 and design calculations phowing the grades and aligevasnt of draYa age facilities be subonitted to the County Enginaer for approval prior tp coastructior and the filing of a fiasl plat; . ~fD:nder onstructiort ~rithin the proposed public stteeta aad easements shall be perfarned tha direct eupervi9ion of a licensed land aurveyor. Who ahall bs reagonsible for perpatuatiag all evidonca of ths locatian ot survey monuments which pay be dis turbed during coastruction and who ehall furnieh tha County EngineeY with "As xuilt" plans and a certificate in uriting that all improvtmeats vere iaststlled to the Iine9 and grades shocm on the approved constructf.on plans and that a11, ditturbed taonusaant9 have been replaced; q'o* ~5no construetion vork is to be performed within the Public Right o! Way until a perrat• has bean issuad by ths County Engineer. All work is eubjeCt to inspecti,oa and approv by the County Enginaer; 4D() a1l construction Within tha Public Right oE Nay ia to be completed prior to filing ehe final plat or a boad in the asnount e9timated by tha County $nginaer to cover the coat of coeatruction of improviments, constructioa certificatioa, "A9 8uilt" plao.s, and mon=nenting the streat centerlines shall be f iled With the County Engir.zer. E I-no direct accees from luts to 1/2 right of ways until euch time a• edditionel cight of waye ere dediceted and roeds are eetablished ee County Roede. . E 8-no direct eccesa from lote to Stub Road connections until such roede are conetruc[ed to County Standerds and esteblished ee County Roeds. E 9-road design, MIMM ~ coneCcuction, and dreinege control for 02 righte of veye and Stub Ruad connections are the responeibility of the Developer. c 10-the[ the Sponeor shell pcepare and eubmit to the County Engineer a deaign proposel eccep, sble to the State Highwey Qepartment of the propoeed Stete HighWay-County Etoad inttr- eection. State Nighway Department approvel of the propoaed design muet be received pncc. to the filing of the final pla[. Improvemente to the State Higliway are to be the reepon sibility of the Sponeor and may either he conetructed or e bond [o covec the coet of suc, iaoproveanents furniahed to the County F,ngineer in the emount ee determined by the Councy Engineer and the Sta[e Highaey Depertment. ' 2 11 hat all roads within ttie plat be curbed and,` paved to the specifications of the Cour.► Fngineer. Fxlsting County roads providing direct eccess to lots of the plet shall be ~ wimmmiAm curbed to the standerds of the County Engineer• 341 AQ✓4w SE'unQn/ Gu R-$ T. Gu/t$ i Gv L3 •Ai S u tru v4.../ B 2 4' -,+20~ CEAj7'oze C.iA/E ; ft~ DFMcArIo r4 or- 101 A0D1-rr6d4L ,U&47' oor wa•/ ,aCa✓6 SULLAU464 lZoaD . ~ t N o aoR,.rc c_T' A~-ct.E.z s To Svc.u v*•,! Ro g~,D ~r~o-•~r l..aTS /A/ 'rA E Pt..AT, 14 ~E c~c-QS~ ~ ~Zo w, V TIL,1r Y co.w, a4.V ~-s E•./r' cbv~.~~ y t~ 10 ' I2-1Vl Qt-v 1C.AT o,! . ~zg~ . /00 5_:)0hANE VALLE(I PI-AE DEPARTI"XENT 1 ~&o6mew, &&e,_,,,4e 7,ae ;V4W&-~ el~ / ~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 July 20, 1978 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, P1 anning Director R ECEIVED Spokane County Pl anni ng Commi ss ion J U L 2 01978- North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 SPOKANE (;QUKly y Dea r htr. . Dayh a rs h: PLANNING DEPARTMENT The following preliminary subdivisions and zone classification for upgrading has been revi ewed for fi re protection: PE-1204-78 Revious Addition ZE- 94- 78 Agri cul tural to Si ngl e Fami 1y Res i denti al KETO- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. PE-1210-78 Fields Addition to Otis Orchards ZE- 88-78 Agricultural to Single Family Residential Transwes tern Real ty- Ma i ns and hydrants need to be . i ns tal l ed i n this area PE-1211-78 Leslye First Addition ZE- 91-78 Agricultural to Agrlcultural Suburban - Teeter- Mai ns ,an.d hydrants need to '~e i nstal 1 ed in th i s a rea ' ~ . PE-1212-78 Blue Skies . 'y . Agricultural-no change ~ Schmi tt- Mains and hydrants need to be instal led i n th i s area • ' ' PE-1213-78 5yke's Replat to Anchor Securities . ZE-107-78 Agricultural to Single Family Residential Sykes- Mains and hydrants need to be installed in . th is area PE-1214- 78 Ma rti nsons Addi ti on ZE- 106-78 Agricultural to Single Family Residential . Martinson-Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area ~ - FIRES SAVE LI VES ~ ~ - , gLegal Descri pti on ;y! !iFor ICen ICeto JVb ' A Y i 1212 July 20, 1978 Approximately 4 acres, af --ar~d on outh Su11 ivan Road. I The South hal f of Tratict Pr2 Ve a, ccordi ng to p7 at in Volume 0~" af P~'s recorded a 3~Q, in Spokane CD LI~lt~(, We~ s~1 l ~1 gt0 11 A EXCEPT the Sauth 25 fe,et Of ,t~"e 321.91 feet a n d EXCEPT the Narth 123.95 f et af the East 159.2 fe+et. ~ c~ . a ~e ~ 4~ o 0 ~ o ®r? IyQ ~,y .i ~ s r ~ 4 ~ Legul DESCription For ICen Keto Job No. 1212 July 14, 1978 Approximately 4 acrea of land on South Sullivan Road. The South half of Traclti 142, Vera, according to plc-it recorded in Volurrle "0't of Plat;, page 30, in Spokane County, t'Jashington. E.XCEPT the South 25 feet of thc East 321.91 i'eet and -1jXCEIPT -u'ne North 136.5 of the East 1590-2 feet. d :L . . , J CO E R~ED S~i( COJNTY LAN 1 NC~'LP;~ RTM ENT • ~ ~ O ~ i , t NU. aEFORE ThIE BOARD OF COUN f Y C~JtlM1 SSlUNEKS Of- SNOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER OF TNE REC()MMENDl1T IUNS FRUM THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMM:SSION ) RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE COMNIISSION'S AGkNDA UAfED ) JUNE 30, 1978. f WHEREAS, The Board of County Cununissioiiers of Spokane County, pursuant to the provisions of the Revised Code of 4lashirigton, Section 36.70.620, shal] upon receipt of any recom- ' inended official control or amendment thereto, at its next regular public meeting Set the date for a public rneeting where it inay, by ordinance, adopt or reject the official controi or amendnient; and WHEREAS, the Board of [:ounty Conunissioners ot Spokane Cou'nty, did by Resolution No. 78 959 acknowledge receipt of the recomnendations from the Spokane County Planning Corrunission concerning its Agenda, dated June 30, 1978; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Coiimiissioners of Spokane County, did by said resolution Set this 20th day of July to consider the recoiiunenciations of the Planning Commission concern- ing its June 30, 1978 Agenda, a copy of 5aid reconiniendations are attached hereto and incorporated herein by referFiice. NOW, TFIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLUEU by the Qoard of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, that basecl upon the information available to the Board and the testimony at this ineeting, the following dction was taken: l. PS-823B-72 - MORAN MANOR SECUND ADDITION: MOUNTAIN VIEW TERRACE, INC. The Board concurr•ed with the Planniny Conniiission's recommendation to approve the extension of tiiiie. 2. PN-1100-77 - GLENCRESf ADOl-fION: NEl_SON The Board concurred with tlie Planning (.oiiuiiission's finding that an extension of time would not be necessary because PN-1100-Glencrest Addition had been approved as a f i na l pl a t, a f te r th~.~ Agerida for June 30, 1978 had been prepa red and pri or to the Plannin9 Conbnission's Nearing of that dote. 3. PE-1108-17 - l. k M SUBCIIVI~IUN. LUNDY AtJU P1ILLHEISLER ZE- 86-77 AGRICULTURAI TO SINGLE_FAMILY~ RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred vjith Ctie nlciniiing Cunuiiission's reconv»endation to approve the extension of tinie. 4. PE -1 109- 71 - UAt:I AN(7 !lt I:i CROSBY 7E- 94-77_ AGR1661_TUfiAl To~ AGRICULIUREIL SIIQURBAN Ttie lioard concur•red :v 1r.l~ t hE, f' 1 dnn iny l.ommi ss i on' s recoininendation to approve the extensiori of tiiiie. 5, NW-I199-78 - L11KL~,11(1I1L [L-PIll;f;E.- L R f INUESTMENTS ZW- 90~7II___ AGRI~~11 TI~RAI 70 SINGLE_ f AMILY~ RESIDENTIAL The boa rd cont.urred wi th t.he I'1 ann i n~~ wmmi5s t on' s reconiniendat ion to conti nue this pldt pr•oposal, iricterinltely. 6. PE-1202-78 - MI'-)',Il1fj kIl)(d I lkt)) AUUITIUPJ WUl FLAND, INC. ?,F - 91 _ 73 - AGR I Cll1_ TIIRAI 'o 7W(J rAM : l Y RES l DENT I AL AND MUL T I PLE FAM 1 L Y SUBURBAN Hov i nq rece i vE•~i a c oiiunui> > ciit-ort 7 ri di ;dyreeiiien t with the P 1 anni n Gomini ss i on' s rec.ommenddtlot7 tc,~• ,il~~r~~val , rhF f3~~,~r;l set a ddte of ~of sijid Jo y tv fur•ther cons r the inatter. { wq xR , • i v` 7. PE-1196-78 - SIMPSON'S 2nd ADDITIOfJ: SIMPSON • ZE- 84-78 - AGRICULTURAL 'I'0 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ' . Having received a coiiuiiunication in disagreement with the Planning Com»ission' reconmendation for approval, the Board set a date pf at ~of said day to further consi rthe matter. 8. PN-1203-78 - HORSESHOE BLUFF: HAGEN ZN- 40-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL Having received a corrniiunication in disayreement with th~Planning Comnission' recormiendation for denial, the Board Set a date of l~_ /71 " at of said day to further conser the matter. 9. PE-1204-78 - REVIOUS ADDITION: KETO ZE- 94-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commissions's recommendation to continuethis preliminary plat proposal to the Commission Hearing of July 28, 1978. 10. PE-1208-78 - SNOOPY'S FIRST ADDITIUN - NORTHWEST CONSTR. SERVICE & ASSOC., INC. ZE- 87-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Comnission's recomnendation to approve the preliminary plat, subject to the conditions as contained in the minutes of the Planning Convnission's hearing with consideration of the environmental review. The Board also concur-red with the Planning Convnission's recommendation to zone the property to the Single Family Residential zone classification upon the filing of the final plat. The Board took no action on the resolution and map pending the filing of the final plat. 11. PE-1210-78 - FIEI_DS AUDITION TO OTIS 4RCHARDS - TRANSWESTERN REALTY ZE- 88-78 - AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL The Board concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation to continue this preliminary plat proposal to the Commission Hearing of July 28, 1978. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board hereby authorizes its chairman to sign Final Declarations of Non-Siynificance for each item approved above, subject to compliance with the Spokane County Eiivironniental Ordinance, Subsection 11.15.340. BY THE ORDER OF THE 13l~ARD TH I S_UAY OF X"- , 1978. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Ecocam too ATTEST: VkRNUN W. aILAND lerk of the Board ~ - / Q y Dep, ty ~ ~ . SPOKANE COUPJTY PLANNING COMMISSION N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 July 5, 1978 Honorable Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Court House Spokane, Washington 99201 Gentlemen: At the regular hearing of the Spokane County Planning Commission on Friday, June 30, 1978, at 8:30 A.M. to 12:10 P.M., at which time the Commission held a lunch- eon meeting, reconvening at 1:40 P.M. to 6:00 P.M., the enclosed action was taken and i s recommended to the Board of County Comrni ss i oners . Members present: Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne-who joined the meeting at 9:35 A.M., and Messrs. Culler, Kennedy, Main, Thomas and Quigley. Planning Staff present: Hubbard, Mosher, Fergen and Blanchard. Engineer's Office: Kennaly. Health District: Prather. Prosecutor's Office: Emacio. Si ncerely, SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Ted McCoury, Chairman Fred L. Dayharsh, Director of Planning FLD/myb Official minutes and record of action taken by the Spokane County Planning Commission at their regular hearing held on June 30, 1978. y°cc Id, o ~ C 9 . ~ . PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING June 30, 1978 12:15 P.M. - Luncheon Meeting Topics of discussion included: Aerial photos Improved findings (more detail, with historical data as to ~ surrounding density, zoninq, etc.) Improved maps Mr. McCoury set date for Suitability Meeting and report, as July 19 - 7:30 PM - Broadway Centre Bldg., members agreed. 1:40 P.M. - Hearing reconvened C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 4. PN-1203-78, HORSESHOE BLUFF by Hagen; and ZN- 40-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be denied. Reasons given were that the development is inconsistent with the surrounding area, that it could be an intrusion into a low density area with high-density development, incompatibility with surrounding area and the possibility of spot zoning. (Motion to deny by Thomas, seconded by Byrne. Vote was unanimous.) 5. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION by Keto; and ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be continued to the Planning Commission scheduled hearing of July 28, 1978. The reason was that improper maps had been supplied. (Motion to continue by Quigley, seconded by Byrne. Vote was unanimous.) j 6. PE-1208-78, SNOOPY'S FIRST ADDITION by Northwest Constr. Service & Assoc., Inc., ZE- 87-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be aproved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's Findings dated ,3une 30, 1978, as the Planning Commission findings of fact, EXCEPT that the condition be added that: Particular attention be given the Engineer's condition, i.e., that the sponsor work with the County Road Engineer to provide an additional access. (Motion to approve by Main, seconded by Thomas. Uote was unanimous.) 7. PE-1210-78, FIELDS ADDITION TO OTIS ORCHARDS by Transwestern Realty; and ZE- 88-78, AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL: That the preliminary plat request be continued to the next hearing. Reasons given were to check the legal description and to determine if a proposed road is too close to the location of a house. (Motion.to continue by Main, seconded by Kennedy. The vote was five "yes" votes, one "no" vote; and Quigley abstained from voting.) 6:00 P. M. - MEETING ADJOURNED. DATED THIS 5th DAY OF JULY, 1978. By: Myrth 61 anchard P1 at Secretary For: Ted McCoury, Planning Commission Chairman Fred L. Dayharsh, Planning Director - 3 - r AGENDA, July 28, 1978 Telephone: 456 2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: Friday, July 28, 1978 - 8:30 A.M. Place: Sroadway Centre Building, Second Floor West 1201 Broadway, Spokane (Address also known as N. 721 Jefferson) 8:30 A.M. A. 1. Planning Commission Concerns 2. Report on Commissioners' Actions 3. Other Business Page B. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS - EXTENSIONS OF TIME l. PE- 890-73, PAIPJTED HILLS 5th ADDITION (Revised) (formerly Painted Hills 3rd Addition) ZE- 26-73, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL REED 1 C. PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISIONS AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 2. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADDITION (continued from June 30, 1978 Hearing) 40-000 ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIALX KETO 2 3. PE-1210-78, FIELDS ADDITION TO OTIS ORCHARDS (cont'd from June 30 Hearing) ZE- 88-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TRANSGlESTERN REALTY 3 4. PE-1179-78, NORTHCREST ADDITiON ZE- 44-78, AGRICUI.TUP.AL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEPJTIAL WOLFLAND, INC 4 12:00 Noon Lunch (Place to be announced at hearing) 1:30 P.M. D. PRELIMIPJARY SUBDIVISIONS APJD ZOrdE RECLASSIFICATIOPJS 5. PE-1211-78, LESLYE FIRST ADDITION ZE- 91-78, AGRICULTURAL tc AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TEtTEQ 5 6. PE-1212-78, BLUE SKIES AGRICULTURAL - no change SCHh1ITT 6 7. PE-1213-78, SYKE'S REPLAT TO ANCHOR SECURITIES ZE- 107-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SYKES 7 n-oer- ,P ~ao 5t AGENDA, July 28, 1978 TELEPHONE N0: 456 2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TIh1E: July 28, 1978 (Friday) 8:30 A.M. PLACE: Broad4vay Centre Building, Second Floor; West 1201 Broadt-jay, Spokane (Address also known as N. 721 Jefferson) PRELIMINARY SUBOIVISION AND ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 2. PE-1204-78, REVIOUS ADJITION _ (continued from June 30, 1978 Hearing) ZE- 94-78, AGRICULTURAL to SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a. Location: Section 23, Township 25, Range 44, E.W.M. Approximately 4 Acres of Land on South Sullivan Rd. The South half of Tract 142, Vera, according to plat recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. Except the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. b. Sponsor: Ken Keto _ E.13701 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 c. Surveyo r: Gerald D. Masgai E. 9803 Sprague Spokane, WA. 99206 d. Site Size: 5.5+ acres e. Number of Lots: 16 lots f. Land use proposed by sponsor: Single family dwellings g. Existing Zoning: Agricultural h. Proposed Zoning Single Family Residential i. Water Source: Vera j. School District: Central Valley #356 k. Method of Sewage Disposal Individual on-site systems l. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. I~ ~ _ - - - - - . S♦ Iw r's 2.~ o ' `Oei~+ ('%---r - w'. ~ . o J i ~.ovl ~~T'M AV - Q ~ 6 ~ TM ~ ~ ~ _ { 3 e~ T . ~ i~ r1 T r. 6 s ~ AtAM~ 41 ir ey~ 7T►, , GH0 p IGNTr4 A'VE • . !:.'t.''',•.:• , 3 . , _ _ . r~ • :>~'**t; I ' t ~ .:C:~/. . _ :N: i:G`H . . ~ r►, cA~ T 1 Y,o ~ l - 000 1N 0~ N 13 1 AV~ t I g 'a W ~ T F T r~ r ,1 W _ ~ H•~ u W ~ a ~ ~r.. i3 T►~ • ~ ~ n z • Z 0 Page 2 i~ ~ t TEEwTN o..., 14 TM ~ Z• ',~r~, 4,.e._.J n°Z .i. ~ ♦~1 v F ~ 1 1 FLNDWGS , jul1e 30, 19 ~ pE-1 ?U4-78 - Revious Addi.tion 9 -p~I, , - ~ ZE, 941-78 - Agricultural to Agricultura.l/Suburban ~ PRELIIIM3AJRY- STi-BDIVISIOIVS APTD ZONE, RECLASSIFICATIONS Staff findings regarding PE--1204-78, Revious Addition: ~ . G Dq!M INFORPfiATION : A. Location --*South Central Valle;T locafi,ion adjacent to and wesi. of ;ullivan Road approximately 320 feet south of 8th Avenue. B. Proposal 40 A4 14 -~Subdivision of -5:@5 aeres in'uo 4:4xt .Pn _1 ots for single family dwellings. -*Typical lot frontage=80 feet. -j ~ 796 T-o l *''ypical lot size='0 square feet. ~ ~ *Density isy-~ units per gross acre. 3•z9 C. Relationship to the Cornprehensive Plan *Aporoved ma.p of the Comprehensive Plan indicates residential usage with no density designated. *Surrounding area is also deslgnated as residential on the Comnre- hensive Plan. D. Existing Land Uses *West of Sullivan Roadiwithin a quarter mile of the proposed site, the land uses are residential~with similar densities occurr-ing in subdivisions to the south. *Directly across Sullivan Road to the east is Central Valley High School and playfield with presently vacant land further east. *There are no significant topographic features associated with the site. E. Compatibility with Exl-sting Land U se s • *The proposed preliminary plat appears to be compatible with the existing land use in the area. F. Schools *Proposal lies within the boundr-ies of Central Valley School District #365. ' *The proposed plat is located directly across the street and to the we st of Ce ntral Valley zIigh School. *The District facilities are close to capacity levels, - 9A - /zo ~ M FINDINGS - Jun° 144-19 , jious Addition - continued ~ G. Parks ~ ~ *There are no parks in the im:nediate vicinity of the project. *The report, "Planning for Parks",(revised 19 76).,locates a proposed park adj acent to the School site and approximately 1/4 mile to the east of the proposed plat. H. U ni que Environme ntal Fe ature s *None have been identified in the inventory of Unique Environmental Feature s . I. C ultural Re source s *None have been identified through the Spokane County Cultural Re source s Survey. II. SPECIAL INFORMATION: A. Circulation *The County Engineer has examined the proposed plat and basically approves the road system proposed. *Engineer recommends the dedication of 10 feet additional ric~fit-of-way along Sullivan Road; and further requests no direct access to Sullivan Road from lots i n the pl at. *With regard to the dedication of 10 feet of additional right-of-way (above), that a release from utility company easement should be secured. . B. Sew age Di spo s al *The applicant has analyzed sewage alternatives, and his report is in the official file for the plat. The sewerage alternative s examined : on-site septic tank; community septic tank; and community package treatment plant. The consulting Engineer's report concludes that on-site septic tanks should be allowed and are the most economically , realistic alternative. *Spokane County Health District has authorized the use of individual on-site sewage systems for each lot within the preliminary plat. The District also states that an on-site sewage management system be created and approved by their office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 17 dwellings uruts are authorized within the plat. The Health District also requires a public water system, including fire flows, to serve each lot prior to the sale of the lot. The plat is situated over the Spokane Valley Aquifer and the Health District, in their exarrunation of the possible impact on groundwater quality, resulting from this proposal have the following comments: Impact discussion: /4 a. The plat sponsor has proposed4-6' lots on 5.05 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sewage dis- posal systemo This raises the question of significance of the impact - g g - ~ FINDINGS - June 30, 1978 Revious Addition - continued on the groundw ater in the are a and po s sible alternative s for sew age disposal. - b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd considered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater , and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley ~ upon the quality'of the groundwater. In summary, he concluded that: (1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment efflucent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage efflucent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate por- ~ tion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phosphates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots " will be le s s than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downstream end of groundwater flow line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) solids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 ( milligra ms per liter) above the natural groundwater background of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maxium incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background."..."The analytical re sults of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids conce.ntration, indicate that the pre sent impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Cucrently. rasults ot cheafcal analysla •hov the total nitrogsn contoat of the groundvatec as in the range of 0.52 to 2.22 ppe. A pco)ected in- cceaental incteaae uoing Dr. ToJd's cspected e.6 psrcent vould tesult in cange• 0.56 pps. to 2.41 pps. Current Fsdecal ond Stat• drialcias vator staodarda permit up to 10 pps. ~ d. Alternative •avaae dispoeal sechods that would not techarae the gc~ dvater have the follovins Reneril cheracterlstics: (l) Co118ctoc and ceatral tceetsent •ystsai diaclsacginR ta •urEu• vatera vould caquira at least tertiary treatnent aad per"p• moce to obtai4 a persit for the dlscharga fron the Depart"at ot Bcology. 'fhese systeu are not curTSntly acuoorlcally availabl* Eor thia pro jec t. S (2) Sealsd syitema, vhether individual or cosuai[yp depaod on evapocatloa for liquid rssoval. SoM ,•uch &s 1a600069 havs •afety hasacd• •ssociated vtth thea aad celativaly poor co~ity acceptance. - 9C - • ~ FINDINGS - June 30, 1978 Revious Addition - continued C. Drainage *The site is relatively flat and on site (drainage facilities will adequately handle surface water. *Standard techniques for stormwater control should be incorporated into the strEet and road improvements with plans approved prior to final plat. D. W ate r Supply ~ *Proposed preliminary plat is located within the boundaries of the Vera Water and Power District. *The District advises they can provide adequate water to the project. ~ E. Fire Protection ' *Situated within the recorded service area of Fire Protzction District #1. *Both mains and hydrants of sufficient size for fire Protection should be included as a condition of approval ; as determined by the Fire District. III. ZONING ANAI.,YSIS: *Pending approval of the final plat, it would be appropriate to reclassify the zoning to tleTrt-i-al ./q 6eLt -t `T6,-K-12 L- s°~. P5Vk.z-13;q •J *Land to the east past Central Valley High School is zoned agricu].tural with agricultural-suburban de signation occuring to the southwe st . *Generally, the zoning within 1/2 mile of the site Zs agricultural and agricultural-suburban with some single family use occur ri ng west of Sullivan Road. Commercial zoning exists on most of the land adjacent to Sprague Avenue. IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: *Environmental checklist submitted by the sponsor has been reviewed. *No significant adverse environmental impacts were identified. *Slight adverse environmental impacts were identifzed from the checklist in the following categories: Earth; Air; Water; Flora; Noise; Light and Glare; Land Use; Population; Housing; Transportation/Circulation; Public Service s; and Utilitie s. - *The staff has is sued, through the Planning Director, a proposed declaration of non-significance and it is currently circulating to other agencie s of j urisdiction . V. CONDITIONS: *If approval is granted, the staff recommends the following: *Specific conditions applicable to this plat are listed below as referenced - 9D - M 1 ~ FINDINGS - June 30, 19 78 Revious Addition - continued . in the supplemental sheet entitled "Standard Condidtions for Approval of Preliminary Plats", August 1, 1977, Spokane County Planning Department NOTE: Any amendments to said conditions are stated separately and listed below: *p-1. P-2, P-3, P-41 P-S, P-6, P-7, P-8, P-9 (Tuly l, 1979) P-13. *E-19 E-29 E-39 E-43, E-55 E-6 *A-1 ~ *H-1 *That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolutlon No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the project applicant within (30) thlrty days of formal action by the Board of County Commissioners, with regard to the pre- liminary plat approval; as instructed by the Planning Department Staff. *That a public water system, serviced by the Vera Water and Power District , including fire flows, serve each lot prior to sale of thE lot. *T-hat final construction plans for on-site storm drainage facilitie s be reviewed and approved prior to tiling of the final plat by the County Utilities Engineer. ~ *That upon filing of the final plat, the zoning be reclassified to i fi!~ residential. *That the Planning Commission sustain the issuance of a proposed . declaration of non-significance and recommends issuance of a final ~ declaration of non-significance. ' *That all roads within the plat be curbed and paved to the specifications ' of the County Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to ~ lots of the plat shall be curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. ; (36 foot paved section curb to curb; curb on Sullivan Road to 24 feet from ; the center line.) *That dedication of 10 feet additional right-of-way along Sullivan Road be achieved by a release from the utility company easement. *That no direct access to Sullivan Road from lots in the plat be permitted. -9E- . ~ ZGNE RECLASSIFICATION OR ~-s PREL'IMIIVA /SUBDIVISION ~ - ~ g ~ • ACTION TAKEN APPROVE DENY ONTINUE,~' LIENGTH OF CONTINUANCE REASONS 1. 2. 3. 4. CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as contained in the Planning Staff's Findings, Dated , ' and subject to the additional conditions that 1. 2. 3. D \ VOTE Motion by d Seconded by ~ VO TE • YES NO vf~ • Transameric: Transamerica Title Insurance Company Ttle (nsurance Services North 720 Argonne Road W"aiiiiiiiiiiiiii Spokane, Washington 99206 ~ (509) 922-2222 a CERTIFICATE TO PLAT Order No. 90107-M Certificate for Filing Proposed Plat of REVIOUS ADDITIONc ~ . ~ ~ Spokane County Planning Commission N. 811 Jefferson JIJL Spokane, Washington SPOKANE COUNi Y Gentlemen: .pLANN1NG DEPARTMENl In the matter of the plat submitted for your approval, this Company has examined the records of the County Auditor and County Clerk of Spokane County, Washington, and the records of the Clerk of the United States Courts holding terms in said County, and from such examination hereby certifies that the title to the following described land situate in Spokane County, to-wit: The South half of Tract 142 of VERA, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30; EXCEPT"Othe South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet; Situate in the County of Spokane, State of Washington. VESTED IN: FRED A. REVIOUS and LUVENE J. REVIOUS, husband and wife, as to the North 148.96 feet of the East 163.85 feet of the South half of said Tract 142 and; KENNETH R. KETO and SUSAN A. KETO, husband and wife; and WILLIAM V. HILLSTEAD, an unmarried man, as to the remainder. EXCEPTIONS: 1. 1$ excise tax, if unpaid. (continued) . a~ ~ Page 2 Order No. 90107-M 2. Liability to Future assessments by Veru Irrigation District No. 15. 3, Cotltract between Ver. a Electric Water (;ornp,iny, ,a cornorat:ion, D. K. ricnonnl.d, A. C. ,1amison, Anclrcw Cnncl ,incl Vcra i.nn(l (";ompany, a cornorzicioii, clnLecl ,1prj 1 25, 1905 ,C)rld reco7-deci in 13oo1: "(f" of Conc.racLs , paf;e 292, provi ciii1~; for con.~,t_ rtic•t_i.on of c.li_t.ches , fLumr-_s, pi.pe li.ncs, eCe. ,%~i_tli r-Lf;ht 01 ~,incl c-};Le:.,s tc~ m,iinL:ii_n saici flumes, p i.pc.s , ctc. ancl pz-oviclinf; foi- 1 icn tOr u1i0clicl char.gcs Cor such 5crvicc. ReCercnec i_s m,idc L c) c.he rcrorcl of ;;zlicl C(>IlC1:dCL, filed Apri_1 25, 1903, as Document No. 2-00528. 4, EASEMENT, ANn T~-tE TL~~TS AND CO:~D?' ~'7~:d ~'r';l~ :4nr : Grantee : Ui1iLecl States of Aincrica and its assigns Purpose: Pcrpetual eascment: inci rif-;ht to enter zind erect, maintain, repaa_r, rebuilci, operate and patrol one li.ne of- elecLric power Lransmission structures and appuzcenant signal 1i.nes, including the right to Lrect such poles, transmission structures, wires, cabl es and appurtenances as Location : are necessary over, upon and across rasC 40 feet of the S 1/2 ot '1'ract 142 of Vera; this easement shall be limiteci to one single series of single pole structures to bc er_ected along a center line 36 feet WesC of an(l parallel to the center line of sa.i.ci Sullivan County road a11d it is undcrscood and .i};reed Crantee Illay cut. one hir.ch tree if in right of w,iy ancl m;iy kec}) ot-hcr t~rccs on rij;he: oL ~qay trimmed ziL :i lieighr noL excecc.l ing 25 Leet. Dated: August 4, 1953 Recorded! August. 22 , 1958 Recording No. : 558453B 5. MnRTGAGE, AND THE TERMS & CONDITIpIVS THEREOF : Mortgagor: Kenneth R. Keto and Susan A. Keto, hushand and wife; and William V. Hillsteacl, a single man Mortgagee: Washingtan Trust Rank, a corporation Amount: $83,500.00 Dated: May 11, 1978 Recordeci: May 18, 1978 Recording No. : 7805180105 Covers: All except the North 148.96 feet of the East 163.85 feet NOTE 1: General taxes for the year 1978 have been paid in full in the amount of $103.03. (Parcel No. 23544-0207). ( con tinued ) ~ Page 3 Order No. 90107-M General taxes for the year 1978 have been paid in full in the amount of $365.29. (Parcel No. 23544-0206). Records examined to June 26, 1978 at 8:00 A.M. TRANSA RICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY C~ By. ; ~ :,c . Alum ~ ~ athy Mason cc: Senske & Maskai 7W t . ~ W ' ; k ~ 143 4n - ' ~k I } E F f f 3' 1 l~t ~ +I 1 I i y ' . ~ ~ ~ ~,L7 • i ~C) V.- ~rA , ~.~~II) cl~~ ~ i 1 ~ ~ ~ •~.r . .r..~.~ C4) 4 ~ ► * V F a ' ~ "3N`~ C(7MPAiVY f2C}AD ` - b,S M S I d, os"3 ` ~ ~ . i. el,+~•~ ' d ~ , b ' ~ ~ ~ , ,g a t ~ V ~ ~ ~ E f ~ A~ENDA, JIJNE 30, 1978 TELEPHONE: 456-2214 SPOKANE COUNTY PLAN1~~ING COMMISSION Ti me; - Fri day, June 30, 1978, S: 30 A, M. - Place : Broadwa,y Centre Bui1 d i ng ,Second- Floor West 1201 Broadway, Spakane 8: 30 A. M. A. PRELINiINARY SU6DIU'ISIONS Ah~~ ~ONE RECLASSIFICAfIUNS - EXTENSYONS OF TIME Page 1. PS-8238-72 Moran Manor Seeofld Additivn M0€JNTAIN VIEW TERRACE y I~~. . . . , . . . . . . . 1 2. PrJ -1 100-77 G1 enc res t Additi on ZN- 79-77 Agricultural to Si ng1 e Family Residenti al and Agricul tural Suburban I■ ry E`SON r i• jw • i s+....•. r+•• r s r s• r a F• r f~ 3. PE-11 4./r/-77 4.. aIfd M SLib411 Y is1 oil ~ Mo17te De1 Reyf ZE- 86-77 Agri cultural to Single Fam~ ly Res idential LUNDY and MILLHEIStER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 4. PE-1109-77 Oakl and Acres ZE- 94-77 Agri cultural to Agri cul tural 5uburban CRi}SLJ 1 a • • • . . a s • . . . • s • • . • • • • . . . a s • +s . . . • 4 B. PRELIMINARY SUBaI1fISION5 AND ZONE RfCLASSIFICATFONS 1. PW-1199-78 Lakeshore Terrace (Clear Lake) ZW- 90-78 AgriculturaZ to Single Family Residential C & T INVESfiMENTS . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . . 5 2. PE-1202-78 Mi ssi on Ridge Fi rst Addi tion ZE- 91-78 Agri cultural ta Two Fami ly Res i dential and Multiple Fami1y Suburban WOLFLAND, INC 6 . 3. PE-1196-78 Sa mpsort' s Znd Addi tion ZE- 84-78 Agri cultural to Si ngl e Fami ly Resi dential SiMPSON 7 12:00 Noan Lunch (Place ta be announced at hearing) 1 :30 P.M. C. PRELIMIPJARY SUBaIVIS[ONS AND ZOPIE RECLASSIFICATIONS, 4. PN-1203-18 Horseshoe Bl uff ZN- 40-78 Agri cultural tv Si ngl e Fami ly Residential HL1GE1{ . s • • . . • r s . . s s . . . • • . . . . • . . . s • r . . . a 8 5. PE-1204-78 ReV1UuS Add1tT4]n ZE- 94-70 Agricultural to Single Famil,y Residential KETO 9 aver- ~ 1P7j 1Z6 ~ ~ s ~ 4o~~~E C y rr ` SPOK.ANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Offi ce Communi cation qQH ~`51 Date: April 13, 1978 T0: Spokane/tounty Planning Commission AFROM• . Richa ~d~~~is, R.S. and Eu~ , ' ene C. Pra~h R. S. ~ SUBJ ECT : Proposed preliminar,y plat - Revious Addition aP@~ 1. 8 ,1Q v f_~a Sp~~~~~ ~p ~R"rd~"T 1. References: PLANfl9tiC D~ a. Map of sub,ject, scale 1" = 50', by Senske & Masgai, undated, received by this office March 29, 1978. b. Ground-Water Resources and Related Geologv North Central Spokane and Southeastern Stevens Counties of Washington, Department of Water Resources, State of Washington, 1969. c. The Effect of Applied Surface Waters on Groundwater Qualit,y in the Spokane Valley, D. K. Todd, Section 208, Water Resources Study - r•4etropolitan Spokane Region, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Seattle District, April 7, 1975• d. Soil Surve,y, Spokane Count,y, Washington, Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A., March, 1968. e. Spokane Count,y, Washington Engineering Interpretations, Soil Conserva- tion Service, U.S.D.A., August, 1974. f. Logs of Vera Irrigation District and private wells in Township 25, Range 44, Sections 13, 145 155 225 23, and 26. g. Field Survey Report, Dick Ellis, Spokane County Health District, April 7, 1978. h. Map: Greenacres Quadrangle, U.S.G.S., 1973, and Spokane N.E., U.S.G.S., 1973• 2. Topography, soils and water: a. This project lies in a relatively flat area between Opportunity and Greenacres. Local drainage ways are insignificant. It is located over the Spokane Va11ey Aquifer. b. Surface soils are classed as Garrison very gravelly loam with 0 to 5% slopes. They have a septic tank filter field limitation of slight with possible contamination of groundwater. c. Geologically the soils are glaciofluvial deposits; stream-laid sand and gravel; contains some boulders in places; includes some undifferentiated glacial deposits. The lower terrace remnants have probably been reworked by streams. These geologic structures yield moderate to very large amounts of water. S SCHD-ADM-118 . . Revious Addition - Page 2 April 13, 1978 d. The data from six Vera Irrigation District wells in the area shows the wells are 140 to 175 feet deep and have static water levels varying from 87.5 to 145 feet below the surface. The total nitrogen level was 1.21 ppm. to 3.42 ppm. The Vera Irrigation District has indicated that it can supply domestic use water for the plat upon completion of agreements with the developer. 3. Impact discussion. 1,tr_0 s~~ ~ `i H.~ a. The plat sponsor has proposed 16 lots on 5.05 acres. Each lot is to be served by a public water system and its individual on-site sew- age disposal system. This raises the question of significance of the impact on the groundwater in the area and possible alternatives for sewage disposal. b. In the course of the conduct of the Army Corps study, Dr. Todd con- sidered typical soils, natural and sewage disposal recharge to the groundwater, and the effect of continued urban development in the Spokane River Valley upon the quality of the groundi-later. In sumnary, he concluded that : (1) In normal precipitation years subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent does reach and recharge the groundwater. (2) All dissolved salts in sewage effluent will be carried to the groundwater. However, bacteria and detergents (phosphate portion) are mostly removed by the deep soil layer above the groundwater and "minor dissolved constituents such as phos- 6~p phates, which are known to react with soil particles, or nitrates, which are taken up by plant roots," will be less than the total found in septic tank effluents. (3) "The calculated results at the downst ream end of groundwater flo-Yr line indicate that the maximum range of (dissolved) sol- ids concentration expected at present (1975) is up to 93 mg/1 (milligrams per liter) above the natural groundwater back- ground of 155 mg/1. The forecast year 2020 maximum incremental concentration is 101 mg/1 above the natural background." "The analytical results of the forecast impact of year 2020 when compared with the present impact, both measured in terms of leachate volume and dissolved solids concentration, indi- cate that the present impact on groundwater quality is already a substantial proportion of the ultimate level." c. Currently, results of chemical analysis show the total nitrogen content of the groundwater as in the range of 1.21 to 3.42 ppm. A projected incre- mental increase using Dr. Todd's expected 8.6 percent would result in ranges 1.31 ppm. to 3.71 ppm. Current Federal and State drinking water standards permit up to 10 ppm. r . ^ Revious Addition Page 3 April 13, 1978 d. Alternative sewage disposal methods that -would not recharge the ground- water have the following general characteristics: (1) Collector and central treatment systems discharging to suxface waters would require at least tertiary treatment and perhaps more to obtain a permit for the discharge from the Department of Ecology. These systems are not currently economically available for this pro,j ect . (2) Sealed systems, whether individual or community, depend on evaporation for liquid removal. Some, such as lagoons, have safety hazards associated with them and relatively poor community acceptance. 4. Recommend that: a. A public water system, including fire flows, serve each lot prior to sale of the lot. b. Each lot be authorized the use of an individual on-site sewage system. c. An on-site sewage management system be created and approved by this office prior to the signing of the final plat if more than a total of 17 dwelling units are authorized within the plat. sk cc: Senske & Masgai, Inc. 9803 East Sprague Spokane, Washington 99206 ~ /0000 5POKANE VALLEq FIRE DEPARTIAENT ~ 1 ~ soWawe, dow4 ~~4e&w Vl~le . EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99286 • TELEPHONE (509) 926-1700 , June 19, 1978 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, P1 anni ng Di rector ~ Spokane County Planning Commission . North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Mr. Dayharsh: The following zone change~ ha~s been reviewed for fire protection: PE-1108-77 L and M Suod' vis.ionf(Monte Del Rey) ~ ZE- 86-77 Lundy andypMill hs.i sl er- , Mains and hydrants need to be installe,4 ),n' this are,d ~nd required storage to provide _ adequat,,e fire fl~ow. ~ °j • PE-1109- 77 Oakl a~nd;'Acres ~ ZE- 94- 77 Cro~by- - Mai~~s and hydrant$"need to be i ns tal 1 ed i n th is , a rea., -,PE-1202-78 Mi ss ifln ~Ri dge A~~,,rst Addi ti on ZE- 91-78 WQl fl and, Inc~- .Mai ns, and taydrants need to be i ns tal 1 ed i n thi s area . ~ ~ . , ~ „r PE-1196-78' Simpsor)'s 2n#,A~dd;itf911,r~ ZE- 84-78 S,ibpson- hl? i~~t aants need t e installed i n Ts a - ~ r 4 ` t l q~ Tp I• I l ' 713 J S PE-1204-7ti§ Rev'ious,~Add,i~t~ o.~, ' ZEr 94-?,8 ` Keto- s;Ma~in,&A '~;n,d' a~ed to ~e~i ns,ta 1 ed . ~ n f a ` ~ ' , ~ this , J t . PE-1208- 7$ SnooRy's Fi rs tAddi ti"on ' . ZE- 87-78 Northwest Cor~str.- ~rv:x=~' Assoc. Inc.-Mains'+and • hydrants need to be i ns ta11 ed i n th i s area. 1 l \L n U PE-1210-78 Fields Addition to Otis Orchards ZE- 88-78 Transwestern Realty- Mains and hydrants need to~be, i ,al d in this area. ; R ECEIVED 00 Lt. of Inspectors JUN 2 1 1978 _ AC : s n SPOKANE CpUNn► S~1 VE LI f~~ ING Q~~g~~ ~ ~'RE VENT FIRES 7 O ~ F! ~E OF COUNTY ENG: EER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote ~ V~OF 2.0 1978 Inter-off'tce Con+municatioe Ta P LANN I NG COlQtI S S I ON GARY KENNALY, PLANNING 6 TRAFFIC DIVISION ENGINEER fro~t _ . Sub~ec! BQAD S4NDIT IQNS *F-0 'PE ~~06r t (Zevlous 4C)DI-rip-i *C O N D I T I O N S C I R C L E D A P P L Y T U P L A T U N D E R C O N S I D E R A T I O N . ~ that conditional approval of the plat is givea eubject to dedicarion oF Right of Llay to the public and approval of the road system in the plat by the County Eagiaea;; . (fom> haC plans, profile9, and cross sections showing propo9ed street centerlina and curb grades be submitted to the County Engineer for approval prior to constructioa and the filing of a final plar; • . a that drainage plan9 and design calculatioas ehoving the grade9 and alig=ent of draiaw age facilities be submitted to [he Cvunty Engiaeer for approval prior tp c.oastruction and the filing of a fiaal plat; . (!:31UCnder onstruction within the proposed public streets and ease~aent9 ahall be perforned tha direct supervisioa oF a licensed land aurveyor, vho 8ha11 be reagoasible for perpetuatiag all evidence of ths location of survey montmaeats whieh pay be dis turbad during construction and who ehall furnish tha Couaty EcLgineer tiith "As ~'iuilt" plans and a certificate in Writing that ell icnprovements were iastolled to the lines and grades shocm on the Epproved construction plans and that Rll. di¢turbed monuaznts have been replacad; Q40 ~5no constructfon work is to be perfonaed within the Public Right of Way until a germit has bezn issuad by the County cngineer. All Work is eubjeCt to inspecti,oa and approval by the County En3ineer; C'*~6>all consttuction within the Public Right of Way is to be comple[ed prior to filing the final plat or a bond in tha amount estim.ated by the Couary En,ginee= to cover the cost oi con-artuction of improvamen[s, constructioa certification, "As Built" plaas, and ^^zonwmeZting the street centerlines shall be filed with the County Engi.^.zer. E 7-no direct access from lots to 1/2 right of ways until such time aa additional right of ways ere dedice[ed and roeds are established as County Roede. . 1 E 8-no direct access from lots to Stub Road connections until such roede ere constructed ~ to County Standards and established as Councy Roeds. E 9-road dQSign, MIMM wn~ construction, and dreinage control for 122 righta of waye and Stub Road connections are the reaponaibility of the Developer. E 10-that the Sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engineer e design proposel eccept- able to the State Highway Department of the propoaed State Highway-County Roed in[er- aection. Stete Highwey Depertment epproval of the propoaed design must be received prior to the filing of the final plat. Improvements to the State Highway are to be the reapon- sibility of the Sponsor and may either he conatructed or a bond to cover the coet of such improvements furniahed [o the County Engineer in the amount ae determined by [he Coun[y Engineer and the State Highway DepartmenC. a11 roads within trie plat be curbed and,~ paved to the specifications of the County CF-00011>-hat Engineer. Existing County roads providing direct access to lots of the plat shall be curbed to the standards of the County Engineer. AQ✓Z~o SEG77O^/ C.tr " T. GuR$ j Gv 2C3 a~ A/ S vt.L~ v~••/ 8 2 4~ FlLo~ eE~TE~ u•✓E E 1 L7 E 0tcATw4 o F 101 AOD/'Tlo t-l 4C, 21 &4T' oor k/A•/ A-L446 SUWU" lZ.o,o►D . E N o Di R.C cZ r4cc-F-S5 To Svc.u v*v%! Roo*D r-r',Ao•vq J..OTS IA/ T►4E PL.aT. C14) R-.ELc-AsC FIZiti.v% U TIc.IrY c.ow►a.40Vy C* co 6 v~i•V 10' tZ/tic~ 0 6:DI C-4 T o•.! . P`t 4 A ~ ~ FE-1204-7$ & 2E-94-75 In the matter of a heari ng to consider the app17 cati on of ICen Keto, E. 13701 Sprague, Spakane, Washi ngton, ta file a p7 at to be knawn as Revi cus Addi tian. Al sa ta cansider chargi ng the Zani ng map fram Agricul tural to Si ngTe Fami ly Residenti al on the property desc ri bed bel aw, s uch zone change to became effecti ve an1 yupan the fi 17 ng of a finaT plat or pl ats of such property. The propert,y bei ng pI atted i s described as : Section 23, Township 25, Range 44, E.W.M. Approximately 4 Acres of Land vn South Sul7ivan Rvad, The Sauth half of Tract 142, Uera, according to plat reearded in Volume "0" of Plats, page 30, in Spokane County, Washington. Except the South 25 feet of the East 321.91 feet. (West of Su11 i van Avenue, approximately 320' South ❑f Eighth Avenue) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STAT£ OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss COUNTY OF SPOKANE ~ .-00 ~1'1~~ beLng first duly sworn on oath, . depvses and says: ' That I am a cLtlzen of the United States of America, and a resident of the State of Washingtvn over the age of I Byears . That on the 14 day of ~~-1") ~5 , 197cf , I personalfy postad one (1) or rrrvre true an~ correct copies of ',he hereto attached and incorporated ~ h+erein by ceference NOTICE DF PU'BLIC HEA~ING in a conspicuous manner at ~ach of the follvwing lacativns,, to-wit: . Sbt c.~ ~ ~ 41L) ~ w 2. P& Ooc 7-016 c W_y & A1 3 ~ PI ~t~c.~~ ~ ~~--POo ALDATEi.J 1HIS DAi ►..Ri ~ 19 9 SIGiYED Srabscribed and Sworn to hefare me this day of 19 w ' Notary Public in and for the State of Washingtota, residing at Spokaner Wash[ngtoi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fi ~'~~~G~~ ~lll~!~ i ~ TE~.~pHi~~VE lV~: ~ ~J~-~~~~r ~ i S~OKAN~ CDU~ITY ~L~NI~Z~J~ CO~fM~SSCD~I ~ Tir~: ~une 30, 1978a {~rid~y~ l:~a PM, ~r a~ soon after as p~~~ibl~ ~~t}~~w~'~ l]u~ ~~~~~a ~~~{~r ~ ~~St ~EL~~ ~1"~~3~Wdy PRELIMINAR~' SUBDIVISI(~P~ AI~~ Z~hIE ~E~~A55I~'ICATI~~J P~-12~14-78, REVI~US A~~IYIO~ ~4-7~, ~~RI ClIL1'U~tF~L t~ S~ h~GL~ FAMI LY R~~ I D~~VT I AL , Loc~ti~~in: S~~ti~ar~ ~3, Tow~rs'~ip 2a, ~ange Q4, ~.w.~. Appr~xim~t~~y ~ Acr~s of L~and an Sul ~ i v~n ~d. ~~re ~out~ ha~ ~ a~' Tr~a~~ 14~, V~ra, ~ccord~ ng tt~ pl at rec~r~~d ~ n Vol um~ ~f Pl at~ , pag~e ~0, i n Spok~n~e ~o~,n~~r, 4~a~hi ngtvn, ~xcept the Sau~h 25 ~~et ~f t~~ East ~~1,91 f~e~t, b. Sponso~: K~n I~et~ ~,13101 Spr~gue ~pokane, WA. ~99~~6 Surveyar: Ger~ld a. '~as~ai Ee J~~~ ~~C~~U'G ~pokan~, WA. 99~Q6 S~t~ 5.5+ ac~es e. N~r~b~r ~f L~t~: l~ l~ts f~ ~~nd us~ pr~apos~d by sponsur: 5ingl~ fa~ily dw~lli~g~ Exis~ir~g Z~ning: A~ric~rltur~l h. Pr~pose~ ~~o~ing ~ingle Family Residential Wa~er Sourc~. Ver~ j. 5c~oa~ Dis~r~c~: ~~nt~~l Valley ~~56 I~. M~t~o~ ~of S~w~,gt Di's~pc~s~l In~~vidual an~sit~ sy~tems ~nv~ron~n~a~ Ia~pa~c~: ~ topic ~f ~i~~us~i~n at this h~ar~~g may b~ whether or not this prop~~~l wi11 hav~e a~ignificant adver~e envjronrn~~tal ~i~pa~ct. - - S*+~i ► ~ ~ ~Na ' I t ~o- ~ae~l ~ . ~ k ~ ~ , . . .,L ~ ~ - t 4- 1 w r~ ~ ~ . # ~ . ~ rM ~ ~ ~ti ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~r~tro ;w'V I I e 7~,~ . ~ n , ; ; , ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~~'~r ~ ~i ~ ~ . . ~ 4 `.i, ' ' . ~ , . . F ~ G G ~i Y r1 lav E ' ' ' r. ~ ; . . ' , r + ' ~r~'~'~r'i ~'r'', ~ { ~ ~ y ~ ~ y``.':~. ~ # ~ , ::~f:~:G'H~~;: , ~ ~ ~ ~ v~ i ~ :;~~N~~!~~: _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ W F ~ ryy~~ .M I '_°t A Y ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 1"~ ~ a2 :'y W JY l_ . r~ . 4 ~ W ~ 4 • ~ ¢ ~ ~ z ~r~ . I r!i'~r i~ ~rt ~ w ~ ~ ~r ~ a ~~4 ~c~~~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - . ~ c.~ T ~ITN , '4rs~ ~ . •~g .r ~ Q- ` _ 4~`~•~ ~ : s~ ~ ~ ° r~F~__ ~ . ~ . 4~ y~ , y._.... A~ 1 I ~X ~ ~V AY~ 4, ~ 5i+~~EEN~H AWE ~ . - . SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT N. 811 JEFFERSON w~'~~~a SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 ,^n~y~,•~-~ , f~ a- ~ ~ Q c ~ L. M. MC MULLIN ~ 1 11 920 E. MANSFIELD S ~ SPOKANE, WASFiTNGTt7N A J+~ `I ~ 99206 voT ~~,-H~aERAeLt . E CpF C'pG ~ .AS ~~~7~,~='SSED ' ~-'N E. 1'NAgL;° - 0 FOP'N~~RD ~ va., J~' M I e ~ ti~o T0 SE"'))'ER ~P 1~7~ C~ v - A`.-~.6'. ~ ~ ♦ '~m~ {1 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ,~ta ` ~ ~ y, ~ , ~ ~ w',- 4 N. 81'I JEFFERSON ~ EID .I;;i?g,~ ' Y • EI l,i o. c` u~~ U SPOKANE, WASHINC3TON 99201 EC .A ~ 1978 ~ gpOKAN~ ~~N~~H~ ~ p~NNIHG OEPART ~ c ~ ~ CATLOW CRAIG L • ~ ~ ~ . _~e... _ _ SPOKANE kJA 99203 ~ 23544- 090 8 n1' ~m ~ ~ ~ FILE 9 78 ~ . , t ' 0Vgj' T ~ ~ ~ f- ~ ~ 'STA F REVIEW Q,Z NVI NIVIENTAL C-EIECKLIST f . - • ' , . ' rr•i - SPOxANE COVhTr COURT HOUSE I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental O!-dinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental C;Zecklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the ThE following data briefly describes the proposal: A, Action (s) Requested: ✓Zene Change; ~Prelim~nary Plat Approval: AO'O'Final Plat Approval; Change of Condition Other: B. Description of Proposal: 5ot-OLVISIO A) OF t~ IVnd ICL A ors ~4~ Fo~ 7)4w r C. Location of Proposal: W. oF SvA 4~ 8 * II, Review of Chzckli s t: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) Earth (8) &"'~Land Use (15) Energy (2) ~ Air (9) Nacural (16) V~Utilities Resources (3) ~ W3ter (10) _ Risk of (l7) Human Upset Health (4) ~ Flora (11) -A/Population (18) Aesthetics (S) Fauna (12) -A,!!f Housing (19) Rec. (6) ✓ Noise (13) -Je*frans./ (20) Arch./ ✓ Circ. ?iist. (7) ~ Li9ht & (14) Public (21) O ther Glare Services B, Potentially sign'fi/cva~ adverse impacts are noted under the following ques tions : C. Discus sion of impacts identified above: III , Conclusions and Recommendations : Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially si-gnificant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that rhere are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance, C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse fmvacts do exist and recomm.ends/issues a declaration of significance. . . „ + • tl'' F }v .f : ~ I ! ' !c 1\ ~ \ J~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFEASON STREET - PHONE 456-2274 " • M~ , •y LL._ %C ~ ~ a« SPOKANE. WASHIPIGTON 99201 SPOKAnE COUNiY GQURT MOUSC M E M ORA N D U M m ~14L~'i~l ~ t''1Rla A't! T~sl~`S ~ t~~t To: sAo. ~'o. H ats;; v wAr~ ~~f ATM; ouriif. ~e*4 am G oI k. Ayk-o d 4&70 Rrr~: ~ja= VA"4110", MA 9'"3 7 Swwg FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 509-456-2274 Attention: 70 P" REFERENCE: Lead Agency D.nsignation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached, Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Dapartment, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the Counry, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following projeck: PJF-1*q0q -76 C ,Rfylo" 770 w~ , This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an aGENCY OF jURISDILCTION, WAC 197-10-040 (4) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and commpnt as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-3 0 5) , a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on ~Q . Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than the pilblic hearing scheduled for V~'oy -7~ 1 s SPOKANE COUhTT GOUHI NUUSC / ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ~ Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved deterrhine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as complPtely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "m.3ybe" if, in your opfnion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the dectree of impac.t, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional paqes, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answzrs you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future , No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returnc(i to the appropriate County departmenC, State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1, Name of Proponent: 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 9~ ► )701 ~~r c ^01 ,,1 . ,i - 0 7, ~ ~21r~ 3. D,3te Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County, Wa, 5. 1Vame of Proposal, if Applicable: _QF~a , J~'.0 lf ~:'ri7 (IF SPACE FOR E?{PLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- s tand ing of i t s s cope and na ture) : Creation of lots .:~or cons"; r-L?cti~~ ~i- aj.LMl p ~~.9•i l~= c~ti~~~s. ~ . This nrnnos..~i is~;~d~" P1 pt ?-Ti 1 l 2atr ivi,,;z ri a nr ; -i -n` ^ Yir] n ~ P zltj 1 ~ ~ :_Lo S . 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal) : OT;eJll a`X't w~ oa' P.;;"it~1'T' inr" P. ( ~.Mj I iT st.ri31s'.`(',i e P. a:~iacent -c 6aiol arter;al an,rl communi-t.v h~l-i s~~~Qol. 8. Estim3ted Date for Completion of the Froposal: , 1()78 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones): '11?~a-IC, - 3-p0ka.Yie Co. Plann~nr~ Co dmi/7.oard of Ccuiat,v CoMu.`. R.oads - S-ookane '.ountv "nrr-incers S v,T''itic 1i4nk - J-oo?i`c~dne Coountv Hcal-uh Di..~' uriC.t Duild~n- P~rmit s - Spoltan c Co ~ty 'Duildin,- 1Depv. 7 10a. Do You,or the owner tn the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or con- nected with this proposal ? If yes, explaln: i'T n lOb. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adiacent to thfs proposal's locatlon? If yes, explaln: N, O 11, Do you know of any plans by others lncluding the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: T•3 p 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regardzng the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: None H. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: ^ (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changea in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? . . . . , , . , , , , , , , , , , , x ~ ~ . - 2 (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,) Yes Maybe No (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ~ ~ (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features ? . . . , , , , , , , , a~ (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? x . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Explanation: Cons~ractioY: ol buildia,s an.3 x°Oc-lds ilf(.11 n eC%assitatc ~ii f-.nv-n or-r.rr. ~*,V 1 YIeveT~i sou.-I,re. foo-0 of ta~e Dlat. Taowc`tTcY' . laN:1'~.'` 3houlC'.~ 's'a-E.'Sva~'Jl:iLsffi sd_c sC)il CQn6iti0:1s. 1'ea M~ayhe N4 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterioratfon of ambient air quality? _ (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . , , , . x (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? )b Explanation: .ee1dXtAJ_0U,,-L1 hmanjX- `I,n 1.t, P, ~ ~ ~Yl _ Yl C`r i `~'1C'.n_`~ C? ' T'1 ~ ~ - nr:- i p:, -!Q." ~T n Rn-i nT~, . ~n-urn r 6 tlin r~ VC°.rn-J I~~1~_1~'1'~•~ ~...L~tz,..! 3, Water, Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (e) D:scharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of sucface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ~i (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ? . . . . . . . . +b (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, oi through the seepage of leachate, phoapates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water 5upplies ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: IiLrf;asCd ,'~o-!Dt~la$19n ~,T; vhin :11~~ 7)r0G- U,^C°'_ T;t~ o f -ti'n i C~ ema Xll d i , s i l~,'~ 1- iT s?, i~' P 1 n c, - w,o,'1 n i' t,'r i p Y1 (I F~Ti fi h i -n arE.'a• - 3 (TF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADFQUATF~ PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES, ) Yes Maybe 'tVo 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of ~ ~ any sPecies of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, ~ crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? . , , , , . , , _X (b) Redu :tion of the numbers af any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? , , , , , . , , , , , , 31 (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, ~ or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of ~ existing species? . . . . , . , . . . , , , , , , (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop _X Expla na tion: Yes Mavbe No 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, ~ insects or microfauna ? . . , . . , . , . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna ? . . . , , , , , , , , (c) Introduction of new specfes of fauna into an are3, or result fn a barrfer to the migration ar movement of fauna? , x (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? _-K, Explanation: Yes Mavbe No 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?... x ~ Expianation: 11oise levels i-j:i~ 1~e °~mc_~^P. ~Pd dliri m ~ t,~ ;4 1 comstruction oi nl,--~t c~-. holuing. ho,,v°evp.r 1 ~;f Przr noise incroase 1,Ti 1 1_ result f,rori addi fi,i Qn~l 16 lari tsj~ rp existin~ arterial in axea alrnadv b...~r1rErn,ay1d noise Yes Maybe No 7. Liqht and Glare. Will the proposal prc_>duce new light or glare? ; Ir ~ Explanation: _~d.dlt-,iona1 hOusin~ i.d.~ ~~SSOCiatPC__V -i c, tt I J rr'r,t s A n 8 automobilE li,(~i~-s v~,Tzll c:v~ea~P. 1 ' ~ , ~~D6 ~I~„r P. ~bq n ; r ln ~ l v p r° n~ ~ v ri X l1 P l.o~'' ~ 1 r ~YLi. o n j c ~ r t, . Yes Maybe No 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in rhe alteration of the present or planned land use of an area ? . . . . . . . . . . ic. 7y Explanation: The use iS i7G C:onforr~,~t~,~►~ cor:,mrahPnsive n1 an r.=,1 ~3p,rp.; g - .,p } - 4 i ~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Mavbe No 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: Yes Maybe NL:) 10, Risk of UDSet, Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions Explanation: Yes Maybe No 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate ot the human . population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • Explanation: '1--,uc.a C3-' $:l-,c J..gl T)Qnu1 at--Lon iS a 4 ea~~.7 , ial -1, r+.,~--~ Tr Tl.s~'' Y.1~t.1~'Q~Q~_,.. ;•.'ah1 a~"~'c a,t.~11Y' :3~.:.:vE,' f~?'~ C~..~. ~0..~ v- , I Ili j~ll' T7['i~r~~~ .i.ild.s alLe.l the v,4fo4+-L.atll,n Y 1•f 1 Ja ,~<<ta~^ Sj~ 4li v~"b' ~O~:s~i ~1G°`~ C:~ ~o:. alip i~-:'C:y 11.~, i ~Y~ .:s~ca s~AY~'`1~'o%1'~.d:..-~. 12. HousinQ. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing ? . . . . . . . . . J~ ~ Explanation: The Samae ad s',~mr .2ro :1 .,'11 ta',J- 0ve a'oT)I~.:;5 to 'npu31,n7. Yes Maybe No 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: ~ (a) Generation of additional vehicular movemPnt? . . . . . - (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems ? . . . . . (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or good s ? . . . . . . . . . 1 w (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ~ (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? , . . , . . . . . . . . . u Explanation: 77~ C." ~ io,. ~ _ ,7, -t ~ ~ r i'~° 'a f~Cl : i ~ ~ ' ~ t~J ~ ~•1'r ~s. li 1.G ~u J~' C '~r- ~i ~ G ~'u; C.~i ~ :t Q I'~ ~ , ~ n~..~1:~,:.,a~~.~a ~ SS lIC• YCS~ ~ ,C i-'v'~.~'.~~ca~i.: ~.T-..CjjZjtjT .:jjj h~ C)ver~ll n:Ci,rt?no~ o.^. Lt e d a jrojuC- G.' s s17~::. ot 8 - 5 - b (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, ~ or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the followfng areas ? (a) Fire protection? . . . . . , . , . . , . , , . , (b) Police protection? . . , . , , . . . . , , , , , ir _ (c) Schools ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other recreational facilities ? . . . . . , , , (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (fl Other governmental servfces? . . . . , , , , . x _ Explanation: The loc~"~~; qr.hnQ~rr~ rn~~ qf~i l 1 bn im,T„at.nH-by 1 nma l lq niisi nG p0niilat.i nvi n nrl ro,-LrLa. Tb'? cffect rrill ~oe oii set to aon.~ d0~;ree bv ac~d~ti.onal tax x' @ vE,' n1~~ s -,1C Ilcrat. Cd* Yes Maybe No 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? X Explanation: Yes Maybe No 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas ? , . . . . , , , , , , , x (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . , x (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . zt (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . , . . . . . , , , . , x _ (e) Storm water drainage? , . . . . , . . , , , (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . , . . . . . . . . . x Explanatfon: .11 utili-uics will be impacted; ho-viever, T;rirmari1y throilgh mxtuen5ion of sy°s~loms rather than °'nevilt or altered sustems. SeTvra7,e ais-oosal (cn-aite ) aYld vtorn, T~-iuter drainage ( on-sate ) tisi.ll be required. Yes Maybe No 17, Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health I azard (excluding mental health) ? . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . x Explana tion : ' -6- ~ . . . ~ . (IF '%SJPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Yes Maybe No 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of - any scenic vista or view open to the public, or wlll the pro- posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? , , , , , , , Explana tion : Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities Explanation: Yes Maybe No 20, Archeological/Historfcal. W.11 the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeologicEil or historical site, structure, object or building? , , , , , , Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full dtsclosure on my part, Spokane County may wtthdraw any declaration o# nonsignlficance that !t might issue in reliance upon this checkli st o Date: Proponent: \ (Please Print or Type) Proponent: =~Cr1 KIC-L40 Address: '~A 1 3 701 irr=) 71~,~ r Phone: 012L-860Q Person completing form: Ab~~~~~~1 ~Ca1JpLC Phone: 924-3759 Date: l Dapt. or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: A l Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: 117I7 r - -7 1 ri~ ! ~r~~'y• ~ . 60° N01~P B~d .~e Rl dERADAL--, lMASr ti'~; UN March 29, 1978 Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201 RE: REVIOUS ADDITION Dear Sir: This letter is to verify that the above subdivision lies within our boundaries and Vera Water and Power District can supply power and water to the above subdivision providing the developer complies with the District's polies, rules and regulations. Sincerely, . . r William J. Jobb Assistant Manage db #950.78 RE CE IV E MAR 31 1978 SPOKANE COUfVTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT w - ~ l~r I{en heto No. 1212 " . . - ~ ~ + ~ V~ . - _ • - ~ . ._i_ . . _ - . _ - ~ -I • » _ . . 4 1 ~ ~ . _-w 3 . . ~ t recordnci ir Uc;lu~e "0ll of r? at^, ; aZ_e 30, i'as?z-.ncton . . . . _ ; . . , , , . ~ - - . ; - - • • Oil f e et _ ~ . _ . . - • D~ • ~ ~~QlNLD D. r,~. : •O~ ~ IYAS~ rw~ ~j' ~ • 4 ~ . y. G-S"- 77 • ~ • y . , . 0 ; ae . ~ ' GISfEW~`~•' . , . 9! S LAND . , _ , OL A ~ E.t.._._~ 1 7 ~ A~ ATIC:'~ : O:.i•~ ssaasstK~~tras asa«~s*s~*MiFi~~tM~*~y~«tMi~~+yi~ss~ti~r:r,tf*~*yi*yY:i~rar=a*,sr~* ~s• a~♦r~~•fra~: ■t• ~ ~om_ i? 4Zed by apFiycazt and .:~urvefo: X-`L".ti !CTD LJLJi1L`1t.Ea•syc*asfss~s~~a►eksssnsitsyi~ss~s~s~i~ss~sslt~rsfe*ss*tfss~ss*ssssssac:*sss*~ts*sa~:ss T,,, ic~a1 amount c' I~a iJ SLlI.'iv~sion: Acree Total Number of Lots ~rO:JCaeC den,it-r of ths r at: Lots/Gross Jkcre T~ia1 amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or =onsor: ?roposes II6e of coatrolled adJoi n la,nd: _ 'dhat i.s the driving distaace in milas to the nearest iire station? i. Shopping facilities? Municina Boundar7• : ; ~ a, ~ ~ - „ - . . ~~y ~~~~~T II~'~~iriiif~ssiliiasa~ 1sia*• ia~as ~~y*s t+~raisasR~siY+y~ww.a •rrss s ~ wa • ~tyJaa. r s• s•~~crs Y s y ~ ..r . .i. . f.. r-' o, j f1'.~ r v e v t+a v ~ ~ ~ li • V I~.i~r. C~ ~ ^ . t ~ ~ ~ ~ / Duplexes C ) . Indicate ~lots for duplexes: ~4l :Ial. ti- fatail y 3we1? ::ag un t s( Indi c ate wh= ca lo t s: Mobila 3omes ( Other ( Describe other usez: Desc_,"_'-_e any non-rasidenti~.r: ase tiZ'oDOSE,'d in }`.:e a--: .K IY u..... li ~..d .7~ L- ~ V~. ~ 1C: ~ i es_at~ ~ . . ~J ^rope.tf rroDGSZ~:. ..o oz List type of uses: Cultivated land: acres. Pasture: acre`~ Timber: acres. Vacaat: acres. Oth? T 3 keepin,g of aai.mals deaired? No Yes ( ) . " .~VY~I'~.tl'f~~~~=tfly~IftM*1~~i#~*!f*~*yllssl~l~**l~~Sit70i1Rt~l1~~r~1t1[~trts s t a♦~. s a ~ a~.a. qou plan to file the PI-at in its entiretp as proposed, or wi.ll it be a mult~-p'rzase deve- : pment? - , - . ♦ ! what level of improvzment y+:i.11 st: eets be coastructEd? Gravel C )-:~i~= ~um. ~ b and Gravel ( ) . Curb and Paved ?aved only C ) . .,scribe -3---y ;.ombisat_ons of abo^e: , =at -s the t:.me pez-i od e:c-aected for complal:e 4evelcpmeai ot t:e ?lat: ' ~:m:;rove-ment3 -~omci eted' . . .JuC3t2.ntia?. :i=Ce_ 1,3 t3 :.Cc:1:;13C1:' - J 'iE"d1.C3tiC.^r J _ 3.^_.' ~ a II.".f cZ' oi:bi_:. CvII t?5.~13 ~8d:~ ~ ParKJ , oCi ^ols ~ ? ~v • .1, ~ . • ~ / s ✓?y__ _...a • ' ; e ~ • , = ,y - ` ~ . .t- J d . .7 ~ Z. _ ~ _ . ? ~ v ~ J . .a . ~ . J . . , p , r, ~ ..'v~ _ ..Jti.mated Sal.e `TZCe i~• ~'r.'a,,~~_, . . i + L • . :y sz ec~3.:. ac.,.: ~ °z- "_.c ,_..n a .;C' :...........d~C :e .=."i I 3 ..;a'-. .'iC ~ i . 7~.~ ~ . . '*r'rr~"n-~C~wK•ys~s,a~:w~tis~s~■s~~ass*afsrs.s~s*s+.s~sss•was~s*ssssa~awa.*•sa~.~aa.•~~s~aa*r•:r~~a c3te ~ae F: opvsec methcd c4f' 3ewage dispcsa1: Septic ta:k. l _aKzon ( -'--e3 :ment pla.at C Other, or combinatioa.9 (Desc: ibe ) :-sicata ths proposed source of water surply: Indi.7idua~. . , ?rivate commu*+ity sy9tem ( ) . --dicate raethod of extetdi.ng se: vice to the lots (Dweiiings) : Gncerground utility easesnents Ove:head uy=? it-7 sS=eMents t II ti.l.ities in streets ( No es.sements C 7:dicaze the distaace from this proposal to the nesres~. - , ~ __..'CI-_1~..i_..e rJr `^;Pa_"n.r.t i ~ ~ i Mtt1~t ittt ~l~~ ~t~ ~~1~f Mf tlR«i~fl~i~*F/tt~*~~~~~~~~~ittfstrt~~«*t*fti#~~~f ~~i i ts ~ a14 s s ti i1~t i a~.ep a T j z~ p4s a.m4sa2,.~ ~ " ~ is • E ` 7 •pa ~~st~BS IIaa~ .q►e~ an~) a~ s48 -c ~seu ~Za.zd .zo; s:;IIamc.:^►~a.: tc :~~s LC 7;Teag 't . . ~ ~s~sZQ uTTEaE Lq Fa1BIdIDOo Pc 04 - 4..a ~~~s~s~•srs~ssss~~s~~asss~~rssr~ws~R~*ssay~~~ssas~~~s.s~rra~a.as~ass~ars~srs~w*~asrss*sssssrt~sss a~.sp e"t~~ 8~~ZS ame~ ssodal..rnd - f ~ ;aZ~dwo~ p=e an.i4 a.re 0 1 e `b smanz uaar. 6sn4=2iS 'C °-Lesoao.:a sz~ Gbzas 04 ep~aID Qaea, (40II ea~) (.rW) ~.IIaIDaSme.:.z8 lso40E;s~4Bg ~ •sasY► (-rezDsammoo) ( Tetz4snpuT ) ( as-zz ) (%-Ot:~saIDop ) sod .:aqEp. avsnbepB tTqvm IIoZST-&tpqns szt~4 STddns oq ~'tTT'~ P= (aTq~) a.ze a~: 'g •Vs.re aOT.&.:es sno IIrq~;uM pe4sn4zs (.*OGW" (sz) BoTST.Atpqne sTqy 'tl .zodaa..Tnd sa4ieM lq paqaZdmoo aq o4 -171 4.rea s: ser st=s ~ ~~c rr~Mr*swsri:R~t ~~wwf t~~~ctst*~~t~ csRc~twst*srts as s~t:a ssctlres~#attcs! 4t ssr~tRMt/t~~cltiR*~=s a ' j Y4► 4 i az-eci . 1 b8w., L .f.t?L) C~O~?R'~T26 : aBO~ . ~ ' , ` ~ ' : (gsa.e P~t) . ~sT~~aq~ sTrr4 IIodn eomertas ~ ansst 4T9Tm 4t TE74 83ueOz;za2z9BOII Jo Qoz4ESeZOap Lus mBarP7~.v% Ssn ~ l:;zznoo a-a"odg 'q-zed Sm Bo a.msoTos?P TTT►; ;o ;PrT Tn;T'LvK so ttozqEqIIasazds.zszan 1n;'LTT-"+ Lue aq ezav4 P'tnct{s 441eq4 Puv4ssapQti osTe I • a9paZMOmq dID ;o 4saq aq* o4 Ftre aTTn;tq4n :q ap,ec: ase sasaorisa.: aaoqie aiR :~v7Y LrnC.xad ;o f,,4Teaaa aq4 sapIIn seaMS 'pau9issap= atp 80b~l,~IlS ~ ~ . . VUcJ(U~~ :dZZ _ : b '•D~ ~ . py L5I . %Aj` ~ :eBO% - ~t?-.':-•. , (esasPP~) v,;~. • ~ . ~~Q . (p8~y {~i7 LQTS ) • ~ r ~ ~ a. ; y ~ O•~• : , ~ ~ 'UT~Sumw Nl ;o 04vqS atm 3tS sM'e-L 9744 PUV 14IIaa4.1 urY~$ L;tmco amrqodg eTp ;o 9,4Bamasrnbaz eq4 tl4ir► aO=ps0008 tm IIoTs'tasedns lm sapum am esd IIaac sBt~ 4VTd 6.reUTmiTead aq4 ptre 6pa4sanbas Qo-per ojut aq4 pa4aZdmoo anaq 'pauSzssapun aqq °I Q3*Od08d ..««..*w~**.s~...~..w.~:«:»~~.«,.~t.*..~*.~.«.««..•«.....«:...r....::~►:.~*«:.#.~~'~'I~O1J~tl .t : OUolid JO :.z84BA • se~ • :d4zOi.z4OaM . ..z~~ ~ :4s-Ld s:q4 oq aouias apwo.zd o4 pa4oacixa 94o-r.,z4sip so saTaredmoo AtT74n 4sz7 sssss~*asss~ss~~ssrs*~•~s~~~#~s+~sssssssss#s~~s~R**~ssss****s~s~*~~+~~~t~~+s(Pan~i~BO~) - S=rrr.Tfl 2 a2Ed ( panQZq.BO3) Snki03 KOISY"JI?ddtl ZMd MYl+ffYa'IlEd v S I S I H Xa - . • ; ~ , A w ~ • _ ~ ~ E X H I B I T A P.II.IlKIlYAM PI.AT APFLICATI0N FOBM • (Continued) Page 3 ss**i#1ia~~fl~Sliiiiift**t~~f~iM~*~M~M**#~i*~~wMt~*MriM~*1~~i!*~~~ttl~tl~~t~ift~ss*s~*i~~*~'~M*~firs~~i! Part N- to be cvmpleted by County Engineers Office A. County Eagiaeer9 Office requirements for preliminary plat have ( been satisfied. B. Sigaature ~kj 61~'yII3t1L'"e tltl.@ d3tC ~w~~l~sssas~*:ss+~sss~sss~as+~sssias*sssa*asssis~.s*s«sasss~s~fsass.s~ssssss+s~ssas~ss~as~~*s~~ Part V - to be completed by Gouaty Utilities Dept. A. Couaty IItilities Departme t re ' ~iirements f r preli.m' -q plat have (have not) beea ~ satisfied. .~,~,w~ L~~rn~ ` - a~•.~ ..l-t~.c..G~ k'''~" • 3. 5igaature - - ~ si3nature and tle date •~~rr,~r i~+~~~i*~*#it+~sli~4fiis****w**WMMwi~r!#*!#s~tr#f**yMiM~w+rliM#yi~Wrr~r/*~~lryt*Y~lr*rf!*R~~ This part to oe complated by Planaing Department P1ann1 ng: De^artmer.t Information Jate Submitted: Checised by: AASM .SCLOOZ 119triCt: PZ'@liml'SSZ'-j Plat Z'aa ; E.-,GSting Zoning: ,,4cv Checklist Fes : a ty Zone C'aaage File No. : L` ~/pi. Date Established: /20 7/4/ 0 S[•~~4 ' Advertised Zoae IIpgading: umber of Lota: V 1 Plat Fi1e No.: Locatioa: Section Towr.ship 2oloow Hearing Date: Ran3e: -W - ~ Plat Name : ~~I 37d A) _ ~el - /)04-174 ~'wa xlil ~ ~ 4,-., LIL7'"0 or ' Cli 6` Y,~J ~ ~o tA ,rZ.. ~t _ 1/5-1 ~ 40#,- fc,4~ ~ ; ~.5 5> 77 F ~~A vii ~ . 2 . , ~ . STANDARD CONDITIC)NS FOR APPROVAI, OF PRELIMINARY PLATS August 1, 1977 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTIVIENT SPOKANE COUNTY PI,,ANNING COMMISSION ~ STANDARD CnNDITI0NS I'OK APPFtOVAL OF I'RELIVINAR1,' PIATS SPOKANE CUUNTY PI.A:VNING DEPAR: MENT & SPOfCANE CUU:VTY 1'L,ANUI:VC,~ C;<)MNIISSIUN I F'lanning Commission. (P-1) That the plat be des:gnecl as indicated or', the prelimiriary plat of recorc and/or attached sheets as notec? (P-2) Ttiat a slnterzent be placed in the dedication to tZC: effPCt that no more tnan one c3we11- ing structare k:e placed on any one lot, iiar shal'z aiiy lot he further subdivided for tha parposes of r,rcating addYtiona' '_nts or auilclinq Sites vvirhout fil ing a rep1a' (P-?) That the plat provide for right Of way Wrldt}: fu: street 5 as iridicated an the prelimir.ary plat of record (P-9) 'I'hat appropriate proviston be made that tiie foll3wing described property bc held in trust until the continuation of the streets be dedlcated or decded: A 1' StrLp at the er.ds or eagas of all streets "hat terminatc or b~rdcr the p?at bouridary. (Tempurary cL1 de sacs are required wnen streets terminate at the pla: buuiiclaries.) (F'-5) That approprzatc street riames be indicated (P-6) That approprLate u±ility easoments he zntiica*ed on coples of the approved prclirninary plat for distributian ta trie Ylailning Department and the uti.lLty cor:ipariies Written ap- proval of the easen:ents by thc utility com»any itiust be received priUr to the suarr.ittal of t'ie final plat (P-7) That a plan for water facilities adequate for fire protection hE approveci by the water sup- plier and fire protection district. Said water ulan muat also 11ave bcen approved by the apprapriate healtn authoritiea The t:ealth authorities, water supplzel (parveyor), and fire protection district will cei-tify, prior to _ne fllina of the flnal plat, an the face of said water plan tnat the plan is in confDrmanc€: wi*h their requi.emer.ts and will ade- yuately satr5fy their respective needs Said water plan and cer*.i:`icatzon will be clraft- ed on a transparency suitable for reprodur.tinn The purveyor will also cer*_ify prior to the filinc; of the fina] plat or_ a copy of said water plan that appropriate contractual arrangemer.ts have t>een made witn the plat sponsor for corl- structlon of the wa±er system, ;n accordance with thc approveci plai1, ayid iri accordance writll a tsmn schedule. Thc time schedule will provicle, in any case, foi ca:,-plet_on of the water systern and inspectian by the appropriate health a.rthnritae!~- prwr tv applica- tian for bLulding perrnits w~t'i3n tfio plat. Th,e Contractual arrangements will incluae a provision holding Spo;cane Coun°.y and the purveyor tiarmless from claims by ary iot purchaser refLSed a l;;zilding permit due ta the fa:.luNe of t-ie plat sponsar to Gatisfactor- ily complete the approved water system. The plat c;edlcation cv111 coritair, a statement tn the. effer,t that the publLC water systerTi as approved by Courily and State Ilealth autl:or.tie5 and the local firc) distrlct arid pur- veyor wiIl ue installed withtn this plat, and the subc?LVider will provide for indlvxdual dhmestic water ssrvice as well as fire protection ±o cach ;,ot pcior to sale of each lot. (P-8) That a certificatc, af title be furnished the Plinninq Department prior to the filtnq of the final plat. (P-9) That the preliminary plat be given condrtional approva: to (P- 10) That the status of the parcel tn the plat deszqnated as be indicated on the final plat and tn the dedicatior., and that the staff be allowed to work with the spansor to c?atc;rmine its bc;!,t u5e and it:ture status. (Contii►aed) ♦ . STAND11RD_COi~,rDI?'IO:VS FOR AI'r RUVAL OF ['RT:1.1_Vu1NARY k'I.,ATS S?OK11NE COLpNTY PI,AIvriVING DEPARTiviENT & SPt)KANE C,`C%UN'I'Y £'T,ANIlI:VG GOMMAI.SSTn~N The followir.g utems are rel«ted ta ttle apen spacc: a) The sponsor shall submit tne prUp.-)sed fo-r of the 1€;gal docl.rrer.ts for contini..ed retention, dcvelopmerst, arc maintc:riance of al; coc;im.>n open spz;cc land pnor Lc: thc fllarig of the #inal piat, which dr.r.u~nents s.iall pre.vide, among other thzn~;!,, for a rr:-,nirnurn assess;rent of :nembers of a horrce owners° a,;oc«raon fur such open space developc-ieilt and main2.enancc, ~a~d documcnl.:, tu l;^ a,)proved hy the Manning Director prior tn fi'-inq of t:ic fl»al p',at. t7) T'he areas shocvn as rer.reatiaai area arnc%r sdtc:, etc.,►Iust he accirately c.e- fic:ed arld yjven lot and bAoc!{ r:ambers. `rl3e final plat wi~l srow thc futurc Dwnc:d° stiip status of p«rcels t-) bc so1d, parcels tn cecnaan publir, (n.e., sewFr treat- mont s:.~e) and pdrcels to remain ::t c~)rr.:nUn oxnrr.ership c) That the sponsar, prior to filir:g of ^_Yte fana2 pldt, pravide for mznirr.um irr.prov(° ment of the cornmon opon space lanci, such iraiprovc:mer.ts will :oe acccomalis:lcci at the spon ,ar' , exponse ard sh-all irtc°i.de peopor guac-antc;e of .rinimiirr, star.d- arcis c)f imprvverner.t (far example: .urfang arad adequate srorrr.3:ling systesr;) whjch 5ha11 be approved by "hc Y1ar.ning Dzrecta, . d) If a fxnai plat zs to be fz1Pd that caes nat include the entire area propossc3 fur platting oii the p+-c:liminary plat of rer,ord, ~hen tie ftrst firial p^av fi°_ec3 will in- ciacle the recreation area and :t-c sewer treatment szte. (I' lI) Wrxttcn approva' of the locatian of inqress anci nqrers connectnons to the State High- way must hc recerveet ¢ram the State llighway Departme:iL prriar to filirc o 9.he fina' plat. (P-1?.) That an avigation easement satis£actory ta t}~e Spokane Airporlt Roard k» prov,deci far the he:nefit of Fazrchild Air Force Base and Sp~I<ane intcrnational Airpu!t. (P-13) That a declaratian of Nan -Significance be xssued, in accordtincp wat?i Section 11. 340 of the Spokane CoL.nty Envlronmental Qrdariance (SCLO) prior i.c) approva- of triis recon:mendation by the BUcard of Cocanty Cnmmissiar.e:rs, or that aily approvinq ac;ti-on of thc; Board bc; concitaonc:d apon x5suar.ce of T'ina1 lleclarataor, of nTOr.- Si.jr24licanr,e an accordance with SCEO 11. 15 340. NUTF.: The official file contaans an envirmnrriental checklis: for the proposal and a staff review of their chQCklist a, required by WAC 197-10-320. II. Enqineer's (E- 1) That conditsanal app:-ova: of the plat { s qiven subject to Che dedicabion of rxght of way to the pablic and approval of the roacl systexn in ttie pIlat by the County F.nr,ir.eor. (E° 2) That plans, profiAes, and crosU sect:ons shdwing praposed atrect centerline and curb qrades be submitted ta the County Engbmeer for approval prior ta c:onstruction and the filing of a final plat. (E - 3) That drainage plans and design caicudations s.howinq the grades and alxgnment of drain- age fLicilities be subrnftted ta the Cdunty Enqineer for approval prior to c_cns*_ructio» and the fi'-ing of a ginal plat. (E- 4) Consbruction within the proposed pub:ic streets and ease:nents shall be perfnrmed under the direct supervision of a licensed lar.d surveyor, wrd shall be respnnsible for pc;rpet- uatinq all eviaence of thE location of survey monumc;nts whiah mdy be dlsrrubed durinq cnnstruction and whn shall furnish the County Fngineer with "A s Built" plans and a certi- ficatc in writ?ng that all improvements were installed to tho l.nes and grades shown on the approvcd canstruCtion pdans and that all dbsturbea monuments havc beeri replaced. (E- 5) No cons*_ruction wo:k is to he performed wlth the Pualic Right ~f Way un±il a permit has been nssued by the County Engineer. All worK i, subject to inspPCtaon and approval by the County Engineer. (C;ontir.ued) rr- ti STANDIIRD CC)NUI'TIORS FOR AI'PftUVAL OI' PREL[MINARY PLATS SPOKANE COUNTY f'IANNTI`Ca DEPARTMI:NT c4 SPC)KANF C.OUNTY P(.A]`NING COMMISS?Ui\ (E- 6) All construction within the Public Right of Way i5 to be c4mpleted prfor to filinq the tinal plat or a bonci in the amount estimated by the Cnunxy Engineer to cover tile co5t or con- struction of improvements, construction certif?cation, "As l3ui'.t" plans, and monumenting the street centcrlines, sFiall be filed with the County Engineer. (E- 7) No direct access from lots to 1/2 iight of ways untzl such time as additionall rlght of ways are dedicated and roads are establashed as County Roads. (E- 8) No dzrect access fram lots ta Sttab Rnad connectians until such roads are constructed to County Standards and established as Couiity Roads. (E - 9) Rnad design, rouqh grading cnnstrraction, and drainage control for 1/2 rights of ways and Stub Road connections are the responszb:lity of the developer. (E-10) That the sponsor shall prepare and submit to the County Engzneer a desigr► proposal ac- ceptable to the State Highway Department af the proposed Statc Highway-County Road intersection. State Flig:nway I7epartment approva] of the proposed desigr_ must be re- ceived prior to the filing of the final plat. Tr:lprovements to the State flighway are to be the responsibility af the sPonsor and may cither ae r_onstructed or a bond to cover the cost of such improvements furnished to the County Engineer in the amow-it as determined by the County Engineer and the State Highway Department. III. Assessor (A- 1) That i name be indicated before the final plat is filed; such name to be appraved by the County Assessar and the 1'lanning staff. IV, Health Department (H-1) That each lot be authortzed for thc use af lndividual on- stte sewaqe dtsposal systems. (H-2) Thc dcdlcafiory language of the plat wlll state the sponsor wtll assume no respons[bil- ity for provtsion of domestlc water. (H-3) That condttional approval bc: givPn sub)ecl to provisions in the plat for a publLc sewer system. Approval of the destgn of saicl systems must be qLvcn by County and State Health authorities and the County Uttl[ties Department prtor to ftling of the final plat. A suitable guarantcc wtll be required to cover the cost of provEding sa[d system in the amount as determtned by the, Public Works Departrnentv (H-4) That a statement ba placed tn the dedicat[on to the effect that a public sewer systcm wLll be made avatlablc for thc plat and indtvldual servtce wtll be provided to each lot prtor to sale o (H-5) Prtor to filing of the final plat, the sponsor shall present evidence that the plat lles wtthtn the recorded service arca of the proposed water district. (B -6) That an on-site sewage managemc:nt system be created and approved by the Spokane County Health Districe prLor to fLllng of the Ftnal Plat. Auqust 1, 1977 Y 4 ~ r 0011 a ~ ge, ~ , ~ Y ~ ~ p ~1 - - - - - - - - ^ - W - - + ; f ~ ¢ .~:aW i i ~ .w_~ .m:~ 8 g ~ ~ ' r . {....M.,.........~.......4.........d.....„a ~'t 4.9 ~R p •..'q.' ~ ~ '.9 a... n.... a. a ~.,L„ , i ~ ~ I A , ~ 6 s a x ~ ~ M ~ 3 ~ 3. a -b a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s, C., ~'"s q~~ "b~ s ~ qw,~ ~ . f I 3 ..y.... ? " o < ~ E d p.., t.. r ~ ~ b yA r~7~` ~ „ A ~ C ~ ~ r ~ - - - ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r- i ~ .g 6. a ~q tY a.6 r~ x ~ .9 .1. 'd. ~ - h Q w ~ ...w .........~.........«.«~~.«.~.................~....w.. wr .Ma... «.«.~..»:w:«....... wn. ..«.,r~ww. rnw, -ww .......m...e....:m.. W { k < ~ P B m~ ~ ~ 6 # r~ ~d ~ ~ a F k CC 8 C 9 o - - - - ~ ~ ~ a ~ t~ ~ Xgk 4~ w " C9 E ~ g E p ggg~.... S t " a m :°s'.~ r" ~ I I i ~rrrr--. _ _ _ _ _ _ S R4 5 ~b,a ~ ' w X ~ , n w ~ J ~ p ~gggg .N ~i f .~~a ; ~ ~w..,~~ t a ~ ..m. 3 3 y 3 8 W........... 7 '~.f=' .a w~ i y ~ E ! ~ ~ ~ ~ S 9r `E 3 ~ > in~y € ' h ~ . ~ E i. ~l e` L~ ~ i ~ % ~ ~ 3 y g E .C k........ t E r I ~ i ! ~ d~ i I . ; 1 3 3 g~ d ~ Y ~ ~ ;1 $pgk 3 Ali ' 4 ~q.~ fir, ~ I g4yk < ~ E ~ 1 9 7 p " „ i ,~.5..,~..pp~ CP A ~sR"~ ~ ~ +d' ppt " °'i 7 { ~ 4d } i ~ ? E i y. ~ $3~ ~ ~ ~ ate' ~,a ~X' ~ a ~ ~ P ~ 1 b i 3 $ 6 } I 8 3 I ~ , r ~ ~ d? E § g~ 3 y 7 9 B } N a t 3 6 s ~ t $ a, 6 § N I ' ~ W:. $ I ~t , ~a i E f ~ ~ ~ p'~ r° a k 9 I s 9 c„,^ $ ;'1 N ^t""' p g $ 1q E. ~ ~ .<.i...~ rte, I a ~ ' ~ I B B _ " i 6 I f ° p ~ d E ~ q„ j C j r ; ~ ~ i i N 1 m I ~ tB 6 b ~ ` ~ ~ ~ Q . w 1 d ~ ~~%r,