The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-127-77 ~ . . • - r . . •n+~;i. ~ ` .j S . ~ ~ , , . . . - - - - . ~ r' • . ~ . . ~ ~ti , . . ~ ' • ~ ~ , ~ ~ ' _ M,. ' R.. _ " ~lil~[!'~~~.~~k hi~~•.~~ij~±`~~~7~'rC~~''~G~~•r~•,~ ~ ./a•~~•• ~ rr . R. r~a r - ~ ` . . s~.~7R- 3Y~~- ' _ • _ 4 ' - ~ S . ' J.. . ~ ' - \ t-.. f " . r~•l" r: 4 F ~ . . •`i ' Z ' . • - ~ . • ~ ~ . . . ~ li ~ ,~i. ~ . • . , . 1-,L . • . . ~ . . . ~IU• ~d q4tooto . ~ ~ . t , t' . . ~ . ~ , ~ '..y ~ ~ x~ ,y^~', . ~ 1 , r# - t ~ ~ ~ ~ • s` . • ? + ~ - i~ ~ , ~ Y` . ~ . ~TMt ~ " ~ ~ _ s^ ylr' ~ ~ a - ~ ~ ; ~ : ~ j r r • . ~ ',,:w•,~.► - , • ~ : . . ~ „_t • ~~,/M,,..~ ~ _ ~_~,,,.~iII . . .-..a~~ . ~ . -,~.•u ~ t WR , . - ~ , . - . ' : , ~,,,,~,,.••e , . ~ 3"~, ' ~ . ~ r ~ y T . . . . . . . _ _ - - . . . ~ - - . ' ~ T . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t. _ s+ ; ~ t• . w~' , ~ . ~t ' ;r ti. ~ .t3~~,• .j`*.'~F'~'~, 4 ~n ~ ~~Q . ~ , l ~ ~.,i" car•. ~ , ' , v' ~ . w, ~ ~ 1i ~ ti• . ' ,,4 f~~, ♦ ~ ~ ' t ~ ~ .t t -f:.,~ •.f ~ . / A l..,.wJ 19`, • - '_ti t~ . i.' ~ , j.. . .t..,. ~ - ~ ``i yr '►ti,hM . . , . , . ti ~ • ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ :Y 1 ~ t i ~ ~ ~ 4 ♦ 7► • ~ ~ • 1 ~A w ~1 l, • . A.~ ~ ~ . , t * , 1 . • ~ ~ . : , i„_ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1~~}~~ ~ .i~~~~ • ~ _ ~ ~ r+~ f F~i' !i••~ ~~K ~ ~ 1~. 'x , f _ ~ ~ ' ~r y • } t ~ ~ ~ ~'1 ' ' ~ ' ~ ~ . • ~ - y , . 1. . T" 12 i ~ ~ 1' •~P ' t: wh • . . ` '~i .w.- ~ tl Vls ~ t'~ _ _ 5 ( E ~ i... ` - _ ...n.r . - ~DC ' ~I ~ ~ ~ • . • ~,C ~ ~ j ti " ~ •'_'~'r'.' ~ ~ ~ • + ~ a. ~1,w' rj t • ~ ~ ~ , ~ • ~ ~ i~ • ~ • ~ ' . . II.I ' _ ~.E. . ,7'` ,y ' ~ , , Y fj~r ►r`7~. ~ ~ I ` ~ r r `~~7, i ~ + ~ f'~ ~ • ~ r ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ , ~ ' ~ ~ ` I ~ ~lI 1~ 1 + I sl , r ~ , 1 M L~I `r•' I J ..I I . ( ~ ~ ~ f/~ ' . ~ ' • ~ ~ y M: , i • « ~ • • t" ; , - ~ I y ~r1 ri ~~1 a ( ~ • ^ ~ t ' r • ~ y ~t ~ ~ ~ c'~'~' ~ ~ ~ •r ( or IVI" ~i-' . ~ ~ ~ .r'~~yti~j~• ~ e • • ~ ~ ~ d~~~.~~~w~~~1Y•~ , ~1 r. F •1 r~~•At:~~~,~'~ • v~. i ' ~~w, 1- a ~ ~►t ''F 's " • • .'i .~f. . . ~ ' ~ .;L•~• :vM~ ~ _ ~ . r~ - .,~M`~,~•~~~f ~ „~'r ~ . ~r ~ ~ :~q(t ' ~ L...+ ~~t.'.• ~~~•V ~ r •4if•! ~ 1. .j~ ~ . ~ - ~1 , ~ ~ i ~ ~i .a • L ' i ~'C~ ~ ~ t , ~ ~ ~ ~ - I r' ~ wr I ~ ~ ~ I' tis ~5~~ r•;w ~/;V ^ •f ~ p' ~~I~h~..~f~`\ ~ N II w~i i111~~ f • ~ r `iY . ~ ` !yl.~~ t3 _ ` _ r • ~ / I ~-'"~i'y=• _ ~ - _ ~ r • • - • _ _ • •~5+~. _.tw _h►e-'1►1 • . - ..r sl ' - ' i~ ,.-7'~ ~ 'ir - " _ - , ` _ . . i-. ` - r'~ ~ • • ' 1 ! . ~ . ~ ~ s r • r~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'J~ ~.,y4 ' i ~ . > - ~ ~~rt y~~~' . . r~ ~ " - ..p . 3r~.~, i ~ . „y ,"~,,.ae .ti., ♦ ~3~+"~ - y, y"' ' . L ' , ~ ~~w,.,~L , _ ~ ~ IV. . . • • . . _ ~ ` • ~~~JV• . . ' , ~.'7 ~ _ . 7 . . ~ + • 1 • ~ . ~ c•`.~~~i..~: . ' _ - - - - - t_ . ' r• , . , . . . _ . . r~ , " ~ , . A~ _ ~ : ~ ' _ ~ . _ . . ~ ~ ~D ~ ~ ~ ~ • ; , . v'~ • , , ;eu ; . ~ ~ . •'j„~~~~ L / 'xa ,,y~ ~ . ~7 ,~:y ~ t .,,I.+ ' Y.. ' •1~ ~ r ~ • ~ ~ , `4 -'N~ y t,.r," v r ► • ~ \ ; ~~'~rr ~ , • `r+ y ; ~ _ • „ ~ r, rv. } ~ y~ ~ ~:`l } , _ } ' K , . ~ , •'ls M% „~y e."' d' ,i i X' y ~ ` r• ~ M ~`~i~ ~ - ~ . 1 i 4~ ~a1^~7 `~o ~ • ~iF, . .l ~ ' • `t ~ .r, r~Y ~ `rt' ~.i.i ' ~c ~ f ~ I;•,~■ ~ , - ~ ( ~ _ ~ r k ' ' ;r, • ~ • ' . „`'tii,., ` `t~ ~ ' • ,L . . ' ' ~ i , 90' ~ ~J-, ~ ~ • _ f ~ y ~rt ._r • !!-~y „~r •M•^ J ' ~'~i ~i . r • t ~ - ~ ' • ~ ~ ~1!_ ~ •i • ~.r J•- Amo ~ ~ ` . ~ i iy - , r r - - - ~ - . - - - - - - ~ - ~ y~ - , E• ~ ~ y/ ~ At said time and place any ipterested person may appear for, nr agatnst, the granting of this applicationo A. AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 16, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUN'I'Y PLANIVING COMMISSION Time: Friday, September 16, 1977, 9:30 A o M o Place: Conference Room A, Court House Annex (Use Ivlallon Avenue entrance) D. ZONE CHANGE ' 4. ZE-127-77, Aqricultural Suburban to Residential Office a. Location: Section 16, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M The S 3/5 of the W 1/2 of $lock 69, 4pportunity, except the N 255 feet and except the E 180 feet. b. Applicant: Wade Teeter North 109 University Spokane, WA 99206 c. Site Size: 208, 000 Square feet. d. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban e. Proposed Zoning: Residential Offi.ce f. Proposed Use of Property: Real Estate Office g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 h. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussfon at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a signiff- cant adverse environmental impact. nr• -~.a .v c 4- L 0 • ~ ~ ~ , ~ r il A BOO t4E 7 = ~ ~ J LL. F3A1► FOIJA ~ J W • PtT W asa.ws~ ' ; ~ 'L ~ a ~ DES"ET z~,L,EsT A !m 9d I ~ ^ , Q-Q, z DEAy Ar1ALMN z ~ ~ • ~ ~ R TH Q = Y ' ~ 3 i - 17 / - . - - • ' _ - . . y. . ! ! ' "sEEX I E L - ~ * ''t e nscs+ a~ , . L►ci 10006 O ~ • 0 0 O Q: ; ~ - , SCALE ~ ' - - - - LAJ F- NI XON v Q . , . ~ ~ D.F MAiN ` ' ~ r►~ti~N ~ a,qvE ~ ` . JT~r'. •y~~ ~ ~ ~ , < a RivER S.OE~ _ W Fir@ Q' ' ~ Y: _ -to~ion~ c•. FL. I9E N , -'T J3 S KA COUNTY ROAD Nq 2 312$ I . ~ , ZONE CHANGE MINUTES - SEPTEIVIBER 16, 1977 ' 4. ZE-127-77 - AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE; TEETER Planning Commission"Recommendatton: To Deny. (Vote uvas unanimous.) A. REASOIVS: 1. The Zone reclassification would constttute a spot zone, an illegal zone change. 2. The applicant's proposal is tncompatible with surrounding iand use; is inconststent with previous Planntng Commission Zone reclassifications; ts tnconststent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan e $ . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW : That a declaration of non-signtflcance be issued. C. GENERAL DATA: 1. Locatfon: North east corner of Broadway and University 2. Applicant: V~t"ade Teeter North 109 University Spokane, WA 99206 3. Stte Size: 20, 000 Square Feet 4, Exlsting Zoning: Agricultura! Suburban 5. Proposed Use of Property: Real Estate Office 6. Application of Zonfng Provlsion: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 7. Envtronmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a signiftcant adverse environmental Impact o - 15 - ._l ~ ' 6a 4 A ~ ' ` ~ • i cf V v ~.O " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • :te~~ =ac,{' . , , , • . . E- ~ fee ~ t~- ~ ,40 . r 'J r ~ 40e c.~ , ~r~~~ r 1016 Van Giesen Richland, WA. 99352 September 12, 1977 Spokane County Planning Department N. $TT Jefferson Spokane, WA. 99201 Reference: Zone Change ZE-727-77 Applicant: Teeter Realty Hearing: September 16, 1977; 9:30 A.M. Gentlemen: I am the owner of the duplex at 10509/10511 Broadway, Spokane, WA. 99206. I am employed in Richland, WA. and will be unable to attend the referenced hearing. Zone Change ZE-127-77 has been filed fo r the property located at the PIE corner of the Broadway and University intersection with legal description as follows: Section 16 Township 25N Range 44 South 3/5 of the West 112 of Block 69 Opportunity except the North 255 feet and except the East 180 feet. I_5tronalv oDaose the proposed Zone Change from Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office. The value of my property will be decreased for the following reasons: 1. Off-street parking provided for the duplex requires backing out onto Broadway. Any increased traffic congestion will make access to the street more difficult. 2. Any commercial office space would alter the "use density" of the intersection. The foot traffic at that intersection is significant due to the proximity of Broadway Elementary School. It is the only controlled intersection in the vicinity of the school. Proximity and safe access to a school are very desirable for rental property. 3. "Spot Zoning" tends to start a chain reaction of zoning changes. or corners of that tnt-e"rsec ' ~tt~e ~ corner where wi deni ng of roa h e nouse~rrVt'?'L'3'fiiy in i'he sitreet) make ~ t~eqi 14 e n' es fiox. th -erri ~.,Wi th one ~cor ner ve w j us i'f i caL ' UTI gi ve ^,,de,nyi ng ' otlier requests. A real estate firm has the potential of attracting other related firms, ie. insurance, title, and law. Many times a gradual erosin of the neighborhood land use occurs. In Spokane Valley two prime examples may be cited: Mullan at Mission ( R. H. Hoover Company) 8th and Pines Road ( Alvin J. Wolff Company) 4. Property along Broadway has already been subjected to "use change" due to the street widening. The addition of "commercialization" along the street would markedly alter the environment of the area. Locating a real estate firm on Sprague Avenue or on Pines Road would not impact the surrounding area nearly as significantly as the same firm would impact the area surrounding the Broadway and University intersection. At this location several marginals taken together become magnified. I should like to review the Environmental Check-List for this Zone Change Request. In the event that a proposed Negative Declaration of Significance has been issued, I want to go on record as questioning and opposing the Threshold Determination. Beyond this point, I request that the County demand an Environmental Impact Statement. Please acknowledge receipt of my letter at the hearing. Sincerely yours, ~ Su ne S. Clark SSC/Letter Book RECEIVED SEP14i977 SPQKaNE cvuNjY PLANNIkG QEPARTMENj i ~ F ~ f _ ~ ~ ~ + ~ ~ _ I ~ ~ I ~ ~ 5197 T SP~IiA rnI~ ~ YYV~~ ~ Y 7 r.~ ~ ~ ~ - Pt ~~l- - - - , D E~AR~`MEI~T ~ ~ c I _ - _ ~ _ _~o ~ „ / / --~2d ~w.. _ J~ J / ~ 6 l p ~ r I P~ ~t C'~ ~ !~1`1 ~ L~ d ~ ~ " I ` ~r _ ! d-3,~~~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ _ - ~ _ ~ / o a't ~l ~ _ ~ _ I - r ~ ~~G~ t~ ~~r ~ y~--~ _ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ d c~ ~ ~ C~i' ~'G-~ ~ , ~ , d'F~U'~~'i ~i' d~J ~ ~7 ~C' ~r - ' ' ~ , . ~ f~ f r.,~ ~ , ~ ; ~ 1`"-- ~ ~ ~ ~ f . 0,~ 1 • - - - r , , - , / L~ ~.(.~J G~r~ f.~ ~J a ~'~"a ~S ~ ~ 1'~4~ _ - h I i , , . ~ ~ ~ , o ~ _ r ~ . ~ z. 7 o ~ I ~ / ~ ~ _ , ~ , ~ ~ . ~ ~v _ ~r~~~' _ _..~'r-~. ~~_c, u ~ ~ a ~ ~ , ~ ~ I~ Y "C , ~ i t C~ ~ P~ D`~ ,G~' d` 0 h ~ ~ ~ - . ~ - - ~l I ' ' . ~ o d~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r°~~~'/ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . ~ , . / ~ ~ ~a 5 p ~ ' c'~'~' ~4 ' ' - _ _ I`" , - , r ~ ~ 1 . ~U~ I~'~~~ D ~j ,~t lC~~ t~ ~r1 - , l - ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , • ' (J' ~'fl ~ ~ '6 ° f L, ~ ~ GJ~}' & ~Gl ~f~f" .S ~ , , . . ~ ~ , ~'j ~ ~ S d ~h ~ ~ ~ " / ~ ~ 0 d ~ ' ~ f • ~ ~ i ~ , , ~ ~ - ~ \ 4 ~ ~ ~ I i ~1 0 fU?~ ~ ~ C~~ ~ G~r' 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ , " r.'I ~r e~` . ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ' ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + , , ~ ~ . ~ , September 14, 1977 Spokane County Planning Commission, Spokane Co,unty Courthouse, Spokane, WA 99201 REZONING - N. E. CORNER OF BROADWAY & UNIVERSITY As a resident affected by the above-referenced property, I am in complete opposition to rezoning this for business use. The prop,erty and surrou.nding area is residential; anp movement from this would riave ain adverse ef-fect on the neighbozhood and the environs. Any action " in changing the occupancp would soon cascade into other businesses requesting property for other asso,ciated us,es. Locating a business on this corner would have an , impact on traffic movement. The increased traffic flow, both entering and exiting for bus-inesses, is sure to create confusion and problems concerned , with saf ety . There is not ample room for of f- street parking to be properly isolated from neigh- bors, and curb parking cannot be made availabl.e. Not all arterials need to be thought of as providing for location of business traffic. The Valley needs to preserve certain aTterials for resident,ial use; this use provides for trees, grasses and qudet_and, most importantly, creates an image. In preserving this suburban-agricultural image, the Valley I neighborhoods' futures are assured, for it provides for pride of ownersh-ip an'd combats deterioration. The Valley should not bave its residential neigh- borhoods invaded bp businesses; sufficient la.nd ~ ~ • Spokane County Pl-anning Commission - Page 2 September 14, 1977 exists along tb-e corridor:s of Sprague, Pines, etc. We -should onlq permit busine,sses,which provide direct services'to the neighborhoods • to exist, not gener•al services. The adverse impact af this zone change can be measured,-and it is too great. -It contributes nothing except a slight econoniic gain for this immediate property. This, however, , is far out- weighed by the negative effect it has on the economic and environmenta.l values of the neigh- borhood. Sinc rely, , , - , ~ ° Edwa-wdM. Musg ove N. 9'08 University Spokane, IYA 99206 I ~ ~ ~ ~ i r ~ r bi ~ ~ - - - - ~ - - - y~ ~ e' ~ - - - f ~ ~ ~ - - ~ a ` ` f ~ ~ - ~~c.~-~ ~ ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ ' r ~ . ol~F - ~ ~ } ~ a ~ ~ . ~ ~ , { ~ . ~ y C ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ _ - r 1 ~ . ~ ~ - ~ ~ t ~ ~ . a ~ ~ r 4 ! ` } , . ~ 126 , ~ ~ f p f rf x (f ~ r ~ t• ~ ~ r~' . • t ~ F ~ r ~ ! 4 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . f ~1,4 ~ n i v r - " ~ - - e' - ~ ~ .~-`~~~~f ~ • ~ - - - - ~ 1 - - ti _ - e ' ~ ~ - _J-- ~ s y ~ . ° ~ ~ R • - ~ _ ~ - - ¢ - - - ~ r 1 ~ ~ ~ _ - ~ _ - ~ - - - - - . ~4'~- E~~~~ , _ - - ~ ' ' - - _ - ~ ~ ' - - - ~ r - - _ _ _ _ - _'-'--'_a ' - ' ~ ~ ~ 'f ~ ~ f14~~~ ~ - - ~ ~ -~.x - ~ - - , , , ~ ' l I ~ ~ 4 ~ Y 6 1 I o ~ 41~ ~ I ~ {l ` ~ I ~ • ~ 11 ~ r [ I I \ II ~ ~ I r1j ~ ~ ' ~ • I f 1 1' r I 1 ll ' 1 ~ _ ~ ' ~ v September 14, 1977 Spokane Cauiiiy Pla,nna.ng Commission, Spokanc County Coiir#:house, Spakane, WA 99201 R,E i ONING - N.E. CORILr +'R OF BROADWAY R; UNIVEFtS T TY As a resident affected hy the above-referenced pz•operty, I am in complete opposltioa 1;o rezoning This for busa.ne ss use. Tlae propez ty and surrouncting area is xesa.dential ; any movememt trom this would have an advexse effect on tlje neighbarhood and the envircans. Any aci.ion in changing i,be ac.cupancy would saon cascade into other businessab requLsting praperi.y for other assaciated uses. LDcating -a busines,s on t12i.s coxner wouicl have an ?mpact on txaff? c mnvement. Th.e increaaed traffic flow, both entering and ex~ting for businesses, is sure to create eonfusion ancl problecns cancErnecl witM saietp. There xs not ample x•aam for oi'f- streei, parking ta be prcaperly iso7.ated from neigl1- bors, and cur'b parking cannot be made available. Not a11 arteri.als need t0 be tbought af as providzng for location of Uusiness tz°affic . T~e Va:Lley needs to breserve cextain arterials for residential use; this usa pxovides for trees, grasses and quiei and, most impartant? y, creazes a.~ ~a-ge. In presexving thi.s subuY•ban-agricul~'i.Ux"a.l image, the Va.a_1Ey n.eighborhoods' futures are assurc-d, for it provides for pride of ownership and combats deteriorat:Lon. The Valleg shauld not havP its residential neigh- borhoods invaded by business~s; suffic? ent laad Spokane County Planning Commission Page 2 September 14, 1977 exists along the corridors of Sprague, Pines, etc. We should only permit businesses which provide direct services to the neighborhoods to exist, not general services. The adverse impact of this zone change can be rneasured, and it is too great. It contributes nothing except a slight economic gain for this immediate property. This, however, is far out- weighed by the negative effect it has on the economic and environmental values of the neigh- borhood. Sinc rely, , ~ Edw~' d M. Musg ove N. 9'08 University Spokane, WA 99206 R E C E I V E SEP151977 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEP ~ ~ACK ARY OI1~~~~~ ~IPELINE IN-WATS • i : • • 1-800-641-7440 1-800-641~7500 1-600-641~1580 s- Ck 7 11 ~ ~ • ~ T 28 TERMIfVALS fiO SERVE YOU NATION'WIaE . . bV AS H! N G T O V S T A'( E `,~S~,~a~~° y.'.tr c°^►~,,,,~~ ~ HIGHWAY CDixy Lee Ray - Governor DFPARTME~\'-f QF H IGHWAY5 . r Office Of OIStf'ICt Engineer O°van,Re t ot. M",bb"Y~'~` N. 2714 Mayfair Street Box 5299 NortF-► Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205 AUgUSt 5, 1977 rir. Fred Dayharsh, Director ' Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, jdashington 99201 Spokane County Planning Commission Agenda - August 1977 Dear Sir: This off ice is in receipt of the agenda of your August 12, 1977 Planning Commission meeting and would comment on the following items: ZE-101-77 This office would not object in that coordinated planning with Spokane County and present access restrictions would not allow access in near proximity of freeway ramps. ZW-108-77 This office considers the two westerly approaches indicated on proposed Developer Plan to be only accesses that could feasibly be granted to Developer and insure safety of operation. The Developer indicated when approach permits were sought and allowed, the truck stop was only imnediate development in area. If, in reality, additional development is proposed, this office would request that an estimate of added traffic generated by the development be given for our consideration as to the ability to adequately handle added traffic on SR 902 and the interchange area. This office will not grant additional private accesses onto SR 902 and will not favorably entertain proposals, if offered by the County, for a public access route onto SR 902 from the Development. In short, access must be onto Hallett Road, then onto SR 902. ZE-23A-75 - a This office would not oppose the proposed zone modification to allow the erection of an on-premise sign. j Ve ruly yours, ~ R E C E I V v ~ ALTE R. HORNING, P.E. WRH:bp District Engineer cc : R.REarnest Au G 91971 Hqs.RecordControl sPOKaNE couNTY PLANNiNG DEPARTMENT ~a 7-7 , . 9 D ~~J~G~ ~ `?i~s .~9 • ~..P.~ ~ Gc~ . ~ ~~--f.+Le~ ~ • h~ a-~c.J Gc., ' . 04-t,C.l ~ • . . . ~ . 0-1100~ ~ loo 44~ ~ / . 4.00-1 . • 6~~~ `f'4 ,.,-70V ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - - qL ~ _ _ ' • ~ , ~ , _ +d 4 C ~ ~ ~i~~ • ~ • ~ ~ - ir ~ 1 . . , ~ ! 1016 Uan Giesen Richland, WA. 99352 Sep 'Lembe r 'I 2, 1977 Spolcane County Planning Dppartment N. 811 Jefferson Spolcane, WA. 99201 Rererence: Zone Change ZE-127-77 Appl i cant : Teeter Rea 1 ty He-aring: Seotembzr 16, 1977; 9:30 A.M. Gen ti emen : 1 am the owner oi the dupl~x at 10509/10511 Broadway, Spokane, WA. 99206. 1 am empl oyed i n Ri chl aiid, WA.aiid wi 11 be unabi e to aztend the referEnced hearing. Zone Change ZE-127-77 has been filed for the property iocuted ai the NE corner of the 6roadway and Uni versi iy i n tersecti on wi th 1 eaal des rri pii on as f071 ows : Section 16 ToEVnsliip 25N Range 44 South 3/5 of the WQst j12 of Biock 69 Opportunity excepr 'Lh? North 255 feet and except the East 1 80 feet. Istronal v onvose the proposed Zane Change from agri cu'l tural Suburban ° to Residential Office, The value of my properiy vrill be decr-ased for the fol lowring re«sons : ~ 1. Orr-stree tparki ng provi ded for the dupl ex requirps baclci na ouc onto Broadway. Anv i ncreased traffic congesti on wi 11 make access to thQ sttreet more difficu1 t. 2. Anv conmerci al o ffi ce space woul d al cer the "use densi ty" of the int2rsect-ion. The fovt iraf-icic at that ini.ersection is ~ si gni fi cant due to the proxi rni ty of Broadway E1 emen tary Schooi. - ~ It is the only controlled intersection in the vicinity of the school. Proximity anci safe acccss to a school are very " deslrablz for rental properiy. 3. "Spot Zoning" tLends to start a chain reaction of zoning changcs. The condi ti on of the houses on the P!W and S14 corners af that i•ntersecti on (especi al 1y ~~he- NW corner vrhpre wi cieni ng of Broadway has left the hoiIse practically in Ithe street) ma►ce . , them likely candidates for the same zoning change. With one corner converted what justification can be given for denying • other requests. A real estate firm has the potential of attracting other related firms, ie. insurance, title, and r law. Many times a gradual erosin of the neighborhood land , use occurs. In Spokane Valley two prime examples may be , cited: ~ ~ Mullan at Mission ( R. H. Hoover Company) i 8th and Pines Road ( Alvin J. Wolff Company) ~ n 4. Property along Broadway has already been ~ubjected to "use change" due to the street widening. The addition of "corrmercialization" along the street would markedly alter the environment of the area. Locating a real estate firm on Sprague Avenue or on Pines Road would not impact the surrounding area nearly as significantly as the same firm would impact the area surrounding the Broadway and University intersection.- At this location several marginals taken together become magnified. ; ~ I should like to review the Environmental Check-List for this Zone Change Request. In the event that a proppsed Negative Declaration of Significance has been issued, I want to go on record as questioning and opposing the Threshold Determination. Beyond this point, I request • that the County demand an Environmental Impact Statement. . Please acknowledge receipt of my letter at the hearing. Sincerely yours, ( _c,4-u.ei i, .t✓~"( ~ • Su ne S. Clark SSC/Letter Book ~'27 -77 r' . SEPA PIC REF. # THRESHOLD DETERMINATION ~ , i , H DECLARATION OF (proposed/final) _ .A'UnANC COUhiI C1:U41 NO..Sf ~0~~~~~'~~~~~✓ (significance/nonsignificance) 1. Des crip t i on of P ro,; os a l: Z,Q NC- Z'- 147 7 -FO- rQJNvF_!1? GkTS-r/.,t!C. CN 2. Proponent: ~n. 3. ContaGt Person: ~ Z Phone: 3. Caunty Action(s) Requested: Z.O1JP,- 1F<aTr°ov 4. Location of Proposal; N. C Cp1L o4el- Ga"Pval- ~ UoviVE2s/!-4 S. Lead Aqency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43 . 21C .030(2) (c) . This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmPntal checl:list and oth,,r informat3un on file with the lead agency. 6. Responsible Official: Proposed Delclaratfon: Final Declaration: (name) L.; (name) 3ERft . k ~C."t- (sicrnature) ~ , (sianature) (title) Qcl2 Cf -rO(L- (title) C.HAt&m_Aw (d ep t . ) PyAu N 81J ` (d e t . Co. GQ mrl (da te) (date) Departmc:nt Reference No.: (See Reverse Side) ► . 7, For Daclarations of Significance Only: Date of Expected D:aft EIS Availability (determined by Rosponsible Official) Date Entered in "EIS in Preparation Register" (determined by SIYA Public Information C.enter) To be completed by responsible official: a. Brief description and listing of those emrironmental impacts leading to sucll declaration: b. Brief explanafiion of what measures, if any could be taken by the appllcant to pre- vent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider zi revised proposal wlth a possible re- sulting declaration of nonsignificance: g, For Protaosed Declarations of Nonsignificanc;e Only: Date Entered "Proposed Declaratfon oi Nonsignificance Register" (determined by SEPA Public Tnformation Center) Date comments to be received (15 day review period) (determined by SEPA Public Tnformation Center) 9. SEPA Public Information Center: (For departments of General Government only) ( } Approved as to form ( ) Disapproved as to form Reasons: Signature of SEPA PIC Officer: Date: -7 -7 • ' • ` -_-•L , ` ' .+~ili, ` I ~ ; ~~0~...1 ~`st ` . ~ DEFT. FILE REF. a A .`-I c'~yl,~- +1, 4L i ..r_ rSPOhnNE CoUyTy CJUR7 HOUSE STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I 1. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pErtinent data has subsequently been reviewed by th e ~r- ' PLA&NIA) G OJ~4-f7T- The ~C2!'~ following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action Requested: ~oNE U Crcl.xl S.~l F~G~ 1'lQhl 7.-C-' 127'7 "7 A5- tion of Proposal: COV-JV-=r-*--T-~-~L._/ST/ni t. QQ5-~~-5 B. D~scrip T'Q A.ti - r QAUZ~ C. Location of Proposal: %12 ' ~ • ~Qn- 0-- ~ ~ II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (Z) , , (7 U Ti LtT tl.~S (Over) B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following que s tions : C. Discussion of impacts identified above: Lly - ` ~ , III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on II A, B and C above, the staff C4-c~ A++n, r~ TV, , ~ ZIF - /27_77 ` , ~ ; s _ I~ , ~R~ , ~ .,►'l . ~ SPOKANE COUNT'Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET ~r ~ . 6 PHONE 456-2274 - SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 SPOKANE COUNTY LCURT HoUSE M E M O RA N D U M T O: C~~, Ke~ ~ C(~uNT1 OcAcrq 01.5-r A nr.-N rjoiJ : GCNIE PRATHErZ F R O M: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 509-456-2274 Attention: -JOHN 'T• R E F E R E N C E: Lead AgEncy Designation, Proposed Declarati.on of Non- sfgnificance, Envf ronmental Checkli st, etc. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Plannfng Department, a divisfon of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, f s the LEAD AGENCY for the following proj ect: Z+ONF,, Q18 NGog~ Z_F 1 1-7 - 7 7 4l ~Q ~ D ~.-AIV OEF:tCF, The following is explanatfon for this determination: 1/v A C-,LCL7 -Lo - Z Z o Information on file concerning thf s proposed actfon indfcates your agency to be an AGENCY OF jURISDIC'I'ION, WAC 197-10-040 (4). Accordfngly, if you wf sh to exerci se your option to review and comment a s pro- vided fn WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advised that the proposal was listed in the SEPA Public Information Center on: - Page 2 ZE-110-77 Guthri e-Mai ns and hydrants need to be i nstal 1 ed i n this area. ZE-111-77 Peters-Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. ZE-127-77 Teeter-This area is covered by adequate mains and ~ hydrants ZE-129-77 Van Der Wal-There are existing mains in this area but hydrants will be needed. ZE-142-77 Gunning Builders, Inc.-This area is covered by adequate mains and hydrants. S i e 1 y,. ~ ~ Al Cook Lt. of Inspectors AC/sn ECEIVED S E P 71977 SPOKANE CORTMEN7 • - PLANNING DEPA , . a - - • j 1 • • ' ` r,1 ~ 'i f - + l • + ' F ` ♦ . a ( ' ` Tt OfFICE Of TNE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ Dare JdMT: 02 , , 19 77 To -664E From-~J~ E IMM, i4AMIAl Subject CAAiVekr _ Z ir• /27- 71 .4l~,,~/~'t~ ~►v~.OG .T'u~tl,lo~~A~ ~ .ASf/,ds►rt/~'/.4lG ~ /54WO" : .St3of /6, /f77 ~ta0?~.' AL4.tC' .e~EweA/ _ .V~L ~ , A • f ~ ♦ ~ ~ ~ 19! 0"'. ~ ~ At said time and placE.y interested person may appea ,)r, or against, the granting . of thi.s applicationo AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 16, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNT'Y PLANIVING COMMISSION Time: Friday, September 16, 1977, 9:30 A o M o Place: Conference Room A, Court House Annex (Use IJlallon Avenue entrance) D. ZONE CHANGE 4. ZE-127-77, Aqricultural Suburban to Residential Office a. Location: Section 16, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M The S 3/5 of the W 1/2 of Block 69, Opportunity, except the N 255 feet and except the E 180 feet. b. Applicant: Wade Teeter North 109 University Spokane, WA 99206 c. Site Size: 20, 000 Square feet. d. Existfng Zoning: Agricultural Suburban e. Proposed Zoning: Residential Office f. Proposed U se of Property: Real Estate Office g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 h. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a signifi- cant adverse environmental impact. s ~ ~ _ r.rv' 'Vl IV C 4- L ~ a: ~ ° W ► 'i ~ VN E N I \ . ~ J ~ O~A. Fp~lQ ~ ` ~ . ' • W ~ ~ a E'~- ~ DES~IET oc s 46TALQQ_ r fl . ~ IK T ~ . Drz„w z~ T J G S 17 :e,- ~-j , _ - ~ ' . ' 1i6r ~ L K I ~ .'•~...~ia. , O . ~ ti . • o ~ • I Q' Q < Q Q~` J; O O ~ Q; ~ SCAL ~ ' ' - • - , . . _ . .---^~+1-, i Ni xorv MAiN h' ~ w►~.~N 4aAVE ~ - p . ~ . < Q R~vERS.DE~ 2 - ~ a ~s I' t►1 Firg Q_ Y. ~ z toil~+`~e4, ~L.. /9.6 - - r . . . . . SKA • COUNTY ROAD N9 2 3 1 2e;.O ~ :.1 At said t lace -nterested person maY aPPear fo or aqainst, the granting 74q ~.me and p , of this application. ny i AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 16, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING COMMISSION _ Time: . Friday, September 16, 1977, 9:30 A o M o Place: Conference Room A, Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) D. ZONE CHANGE 4. ZE- I27-77, Aqricultural Suburban to Residential Office a. Location: Section 16, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M The S 3/5 of the W 1/2 of $lock 69, Opportunity, except the N 255 feet and except the E 180 feet. b. Applicant: Wade Teeter North 109 University Spokane, WA 99206 c. Site Size: 20, 000 Square feet. d. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban e. Proposed Zoning: Residential Office f. Propo sed U se of Property: Real Estate Office g. Application of Zoning Proviston: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 h. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this heari.ng may be whether or not this proposal will have a signifi- cant adverse environmental impact. r ~ _ r+r rY• •V~ dV G L L ~ ~ ~ 6O0 N E ~ . ~ aA► FaUR 2 ^ . r ! ls1 PIT ~ ,L • S ~ LAQ. ; ~ DF.~•IL~T a ~ ,..[6TALp~ r . _ ' ~ . i - ~ fU ~ ~~A► ~1 . ~ ~dAL~QH Z ` TH loft J Q Sel 3:J.' r~ •Z ' ,a .f .'J• ~ i r1611 ~ L~' ~ , . U7d w ~ I E L ~ " F F ti 1 R rt72'.~'~ ~ . < L K 1 100011 0 O O p Q Q OC a0 0 SCALE ~ . . • f .~r ~ f- Ni XON ui ce z, MAiN ,aAVE ~ • p . - , r~t ~ i ~ ~ R~v~RS.CE ~ ~ • , . W Fir@ Q' . C a = to~ion~ c•~ FL. l98 r - - - ' • .s . , , . ~KA COUNTY ROAD Nq 231 2~ ~ . ~ . ^ , ZE-14/ / y t A hearing to consider changing the Zoning Map from Agricultural Suburban to Residential Offfce on property described as .4ollows: The South 3/5 of the West 1/2 of Block 69, Oppor- tunity, except the North 255 feet and except the East 180 feet. Section 16, Township 25 N. Range 44, E. W. M. ( North East corner of University and Broadway). AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE 0F 1r1ASHINGTON ) ) SSo COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) oKa I• sw GLt;/t , Being first duly saiorn, depose8 and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one yearso ihat on 197 7 he personally posted three (3) true and correct copies of the hereto attaclied NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: 1 0 ~V ~ • ~~LL~ ~i~ ♦ ~ 64S o, 7y - ~ .sd ~ / ~pG7~ o►~ 1 2. O)aPj2~1ail - 300 w Cs7` 0- U~ ~ ~ Lttki-Tl 3. W SigC UsuivMfTJ /LS FT SoKve#'°a~ 4040WA T WOOO _ aw . Subscribed and sworn to me , 19 NO'rARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, 4JASHIIVG"01-q Residing at Spokane, Washington ~ . t ~ ~ ~l ; ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ Ki ~ . k ~ ~ ~ ~te ~ _ ~ y L v A.PPLYCATION FOR SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMIvIISSI0I1 Z O N I N G H E A R I N G Court Hou se, Spokane, tiva shington Date: July 13, 1977 Application No.; ZE-127-77 iJame of Applicant: Wade Teeter , Street ~.adress: N. 109 University City: Spokane State: Telephone No.: 928-6526 E.dsting Zoning Classification: AQricultural Suburban Date Existing Gone Classification Established: 1-8-57 Proposed Zone Classification: Residential Office Proposed Use of Property: Offices-Real Estate & Attorney, etc. Legai Description of Property: S. 3/5 OF W. ~ OF B. 69 EXC. N. 255 EXC. 180' Site "31 ze: 20,000 SQ. FT. ;ection: 16 Township: 25 Range: 44 Street Address of Property: N. 804 University Who Holds Tftle to the Property: Caxrol J. Hart & Camilla M. Hart If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it ? PROSPECTIVE P.URCHASE FOR USE AS REAL ESTATE OFFICE Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within t:UO feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. ALL OF THE FOLLOV1lING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSVVERED: 1. 'v'vhat are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning'e WE WISH TO CHANGE US# AS RESIDENCE TO USE AS REAL ESTATE OFFICE i + ~ 4 ~ ~ 2. vvhat facts justify the praposed zone reclassification based an the advancement of the public health, safety, and generai welfare s _ PROPERTY IS T,OCATED ON THE CDRNER OF TWO I+~,OOR. AREERIALS IhT THE VALLEY .'I`HERE IS A TRAFFIC LIGHT ON THE INTERSECTION AND THIS Z0NE CHANGE TnTIL,L N4T SUB-S-TARTIALLY CHANGE THE CHARACTER OR APPEAFtATVCE OF THE PRDPER'I`Y AS TH~g~ ALREADY IS ALARG ` ST • 3. -v,rhat effect will the proposed zane reclassification have an the vaIue and character of ad j acent property: ZT SHOULD NOT AFFECT THE SURROC.TDIDING PROFERTY ADV'ERSELY AS THE TRAFFIC COMING AND GOING FRONi TI3E FROPER'FY NOV+! IS QUITE SUBSTANTIAI1 w ~ DLTE TO THE PRESENT OWNERS SUSINESS. THE EXTERIOR QF THE BUILDING WILL NOT SE CHANGED ,ANY GREAT EXTEN'T - x, Can a reasonala].e return from or reasonable use of the property Yn question be secured under the existing zone cxassification : . ; YES FOR 'I`HE PRESENT OWNERS 0 BLTT DUE TO THE CHANGES IN THE AREA ' THE TRAFFIC IS FAR TOQ HEAVY TO MAXE IT AN ATTRACT~~E HDME SITE, I' A glot plan vr sketch rnust be attached containing the following information: ` (a) Scale of the dravving. (b) Narth poirnt. (c) AU dlimensfons of pr+operty't existing buildings, and proposed buildings. , Location af al~ existing and progosed building s, or additf ons f vvith ' dimensians to the nearest prvperty line. Off--street park.ing area, (f) Defined pofnts of access and egrass. (g) Date of the drawing. THE N£CESSARY FEE iUST ACCOMPAN"Y THIS APPLICATION. The recommendatfan of the Planning Commission in thts matter will }ae presented to the Board of Craunty Commissioners for final actfon. Aziy person desiring to contest the recommendation af the Planning Commtssian must request, i.n writing, ahearing before the Boaxd of County Commxssioners no later than ten (10) days following the date of the public hearing held by the Planning Commission. - ~ (Signed) A ' 7(4` ~ ✓ ZONE CF3ANGE PRE--APPLICAT'ION • .Date: JULY 5 * 197 7. Application No.: ~ ~ Name of Appllcant: WADE TEETER ; , ~ , +•^+►-r~-r. ~ . Street Address: . State; WASHINGTON ~ ~r 109 T~~ERSTTY Ctty, , Telephone Number: 928-6526 Dwoe:Extsting '?one Classtfication • AL Q-~~~ Ext sr~wc~ Zon. 'lassification Establlshad: P roposed Zoz::. ,:iassiffcation: RE. TD .NTIAr. nPyTr- E REAL ESTATE Proposed Use of Property; OFFICES - ATTORNEY ETC. No. of Acres , -S~5 Legal Descrtption of Property; S. 3/5 OF W. ~ OF B. 69 ExC. N. 24-i6 l &ioMP . 180' OPPORTUNITY , Section: 49 Township: Range: i N. 804 UNIVERSITY Street Address of Property; V1,rho Holds Ti#;, to the Property: CaR.ROL ..T. xAgT & CAMIT1,4 M va~ If you do nci 4.d tltle to the property affected by this application, what i our lnterest In . ~ PURCHASE OF THE PROPERTY TO CONVERT TO OFFICES FOR AT O NEYS e AND REAL ESTATE OFFICE 3/30/77 s . GCD UIW' : . .1 8 Q SVONAN[ COUNT♦ GOURT NOUSE ENVIRONMENTAI, CHECKLIST introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to considcr envfronmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals, The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significal-itly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questians as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybs" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the deqree of impact, asking you for more informa- tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, vr use additional paqes, if necessarv. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts whfch will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be proceesed untfl the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law reuuires explanarions for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist, The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination, NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of WashingCon for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not - apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIROIITMENTAI. CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1, Name of Proponent: WADE TEETER . 2. Addre s s and Phone Numher of Proponene: N. 109 UNIVERS ITY 928-6526 . 3. D-3te C?iecklist Submitted: AUGUST 150 1977 , 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane Countv, Wa,; 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: NOT APPLICABLE , 0 - 1 - (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) b. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limitl:.Nd to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under- standing of its scope and nature): LARGE OLDER RESIDENCE ON BUSY ARTERIAL ( BROADWAY& UNIVERSITY) TO BE USED AS A REAL ESTATE OFFICE . THE EXTERIOR . APPEARANCE WILL NOT BE CHANGED SUBSTANTIALLY. 7, Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as weli as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understandfng of the environmental setting of the proposal) : THE AREA IS A VERY BUSY CROIS ROADS INTHE VALLEY WITH T_RAFFTG LIGHTS & FOUR LANES OF TRAFFIC EAST & WEST IN FRONT nF THE PRQPERTY - T.IJE VERY I~ARGE BRICK HOME nTgFCmr.v ArRQSS THF ST F.F.T TO THE SOUTU IS LISTED AbIl-BF.~TNf' ADVERTTgF AS A POSSIBLE SITE FOR A DOCTOR"S CLINIC. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 7 NncBER 1 197 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rE:zones): SPOKANE COUNTX REZONE APPLICA= 10a. Do You,or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, haue any plans for future additlons, expanslon, or further activity related to or con- nected with thls proposal? If yes, explain: lOb, Do you own or have options on lanci nearby or adjaceizt to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: NO 11, Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? It yes, expl3in: No 12. Attach any other application form that has laeen completed regardrng the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such applzcation form: - N4)AIE II. En?VIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth . Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NO (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering , ~ ~of the soil? , , , , . . , , , . , , . . . . . . _N0 , - 2 t ' (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PI.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL, PAGES.) Yes Iviaybe No (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features . -NQ (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . o , . . . , . , , , NO (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? . . . . , , , . a , . . . . . NO (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, oa- changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a rive:- or stream or the bed of ~9I the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? ~p Explanation: YQa Maybe .LVD 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air emissions or deterforation of ambient air quality? ~ (b) The creation of objectionable odars ? , , , , , , , . . (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, NO or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? _ Explanation: 3. Water, Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of NO water movements, in either rnarine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainags atterns , or the rate and amount of-swfa-6e water runoff? ~ (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? NO (d) Change in the amount of surface waeer in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NO (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited NO to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? r' (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground , wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~ (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception ~ of an aquifer by cuts or exc8vations ? . . . . . . . . -e- (h) Deterioration in ground water qualfty, efther through direcl injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ground waters? x- W Reduction in the amount of water otherwise avaflable- for pualic water supplies ? . . . , . . . . . . . . . NO Explanation: / _ A -3- (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATFi,. PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PA(~ES, ) Yes Ai:Ivbe No 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: ' (a) Change in thc drversity of species, or numbers of any speciesof flora (including trF:es, shrubs, gra s s, crops, mirroflora and aquatic plants) ? , , . , , , , , N~ (b) Red u-tian of the numrers of any u:7ique, ra re or NO endangered species of flora? , . . . . , , , , , , , (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? , , . , , , , . . , , , , , , , NO (d) Reduction in acreage of any agriculCural crop ?NO ~ Explanation: • • : ~ ~ ,44 4~-y Al t- Yes iVlavbe N-D 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, NO insects or microfauna) ? . , . , , , , , , , , , , , (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or NO endangered species of fauna? , . . . . , , . , , , (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? , NO (d) Dete:ioration of exfsting fish or wildlife habitat? NO Explan.3tion: Yes M3vbe :Vo 6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?. ~ NO Explanation: Cles Ye s M aybe No 7. Liqh t and Glare. Will the proposal prc ~duce new light or glare ? ~ .-Np Explanation: - dW I)-r - Yes Mavbe No 8. Land Use. 1Ni11 the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area ? . , , , , , , , , . A NO Explanation: Q?-S . ~ ~ Ra -r t* _ u t o S O C s . ~ • -4 - (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PI,EASE ATTAGIT ADDITIONIIL PAGFS.) Yes M,ivbe Ivo 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resntirrPS? NO (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? hip Explanation: Yes Maybe i„ 10. Risk of iJnset, Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upsPt conditions NO Explana tion: Yes Mciybe No 11. Population. VV111 the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate ot the human NO / population of an area? , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~ Explanation: 12. Housincr. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or NO create a demand for adclitional housing? , , , , , , . , , Explana tion: Yes Maybe nc 13. Transportation/Clrculation. Will the proposal result in: ~ (a) Cencration of adcZitional vehicular movemt?nt ? , , . , , (b) Effects on existing parking faci?ities, or riemand foc- ~ new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Impact upon existing transportation systerns ? . , , , , (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ~ movemPnt of people and/or goods ? . , . . . . . . , ~ (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? biQ (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, 4fool, bicyclists or pedestrians?. , , . . , , , , , , , , Explanation: ^ e~ C T a~►~' w ~ ~ 7`,~d~~,~ ~ l~ h~ M ~ f e-. . , • c. ~ -s- (IF SPACE FOR FXPLANr1TCON IS INADEQUATE, PI,EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) Ye s ~ri y k~ c~ n o 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, a or result in a need tor new or altered caovernmental services in any of the following areas? Ar ~ (a) Fire protectinn ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ye (b) Police protiection , , , , , , , . , , , , , , , 4e (c) Schools ? . . . . . . . . . . . . , a . . . NO (d) Parks or other recreatianal faciliries? , . , , , . . , -NO (e) Maintenar~ce of public 'Llacilities, including roads? te (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . , , . , A ^OW £xplanation: C-" LW kS-kco `t A A~ ~ ~ ~ Yes Maybe i\To 1 S. Energy. Will the proposal result in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? NO (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources o£ energy? -Np Explanation: Yes Maybe Nio 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a nsed for netiv systems, or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? , . . . . . . . . . . , , . NO (b) Communication systems? , . . , , . , , . , , , . (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NO (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? , . . . . . . . . , , . . --NO (e) Storm water drainage? . , . , . . . . . . . . . . NO (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . , , . . , , , , , , NO Explanation: a&d ; Yes Maybe 1V'o 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health r azard (excluding NO mental health) ? . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explanation: ~ ' -6-- . ~ (II' SPACE FOR F.JCPI.ANATION IS INADEQUATE, P-EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,) Yes Maybe No 18. Acsthctics . Will the proposal result in tlle obstrur_tion of any scer»c vista or view open to the piblic, or will the pro- posal result in the creation of an aESthetically offensive site NO open to public vicw? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: Yes Maybe No 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities NO ExplanaLiGn: Yes Maybe Iv'o 20. Archeological/FIistorical, Wk11 the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeaJogicoI or historical site, NO - structure, ob)ect or building? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersignEd, swear under the peiialty of perjury that the above responses are rnade truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also undersfiand that, should there be any wLllful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checkli st , ~ "✓i , ► ,r Date: 'L7 Proponent: , (Please Print or Type) WADE T4ETER Proponent: N. 109 UNIVERSITY Address: 928-6526 Phone: Person completing form: WADE TEETER 928-6526 Plione: Date: 8/ 15/ 77 Dapt. or Office of County REVi.ewing Checklist: Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: 1/717T - -7 I OPPORTUIJITY ST OF+ OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES aN PROPERTY Page 1 ~ `-r y t Spokane County Code Number: ZE-127-77 Owners and Persons within 400 feeto Application is for a Zone change from Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office. Certification of Title Compan.y: I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses consisting of this and the following ~ pages has been prepared from the 2,,to the best of my knowledge correcto latest available r co ds n s ~ Signed by ' For Ti ow~f a ~ ~1.~.'~ 3 o~...a(r ~i T{,~,, / (Title Company) Date : , LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN - ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) I PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFI D, o C) T)PO..fL-FU ~ DATF Ti 161~42-1 01IL BY: .M. Musgrove VM A~ ~ .T" ~ T j Lincoln Mut. Sav. Bank 06 0014496 'PO North 2/5 c~,~i ~ h4 0 n ~ ~ T ~ ,'e;~ 1654°2-1o19 ~ ' Lrth uth 75 feet of f yle N. Greer ~ A~~~~ 229 feet of West 187.2 feet o Ti Lomas & Nettleton D7 46 18773 J.South ~/5 of West 69 0 911 V6 54t1016 /C/Y, k Au ~ outh 3/5 of West Swanson $'4 ~ ~~XCEPT North 255 RI ~ ~ r/ ~eet and EXCEPT T C~ omm~•rce Mortgage 21350 ast 180 feet ~ 0 T t16542,1017 3outh 90 feet of ' atricia J. Nechonicky ,NTorth 180 feet of Wesfi ~ ~ V1,411 feet of Sout~h ONB U-City E12.2 /5 of West ~ T ~ OJ I ~ tL 6 5 4 2 -1018 \ V , 'Vor~h 90 feet of ~est ~~J mes R. Wilson WtL GLI, w4,*, 12. 2 feet of Sout.h ~ ~ /5 feet of West T,Mrs. James R. Wilson N. 902 University Rd. al,~.' • ' (CoAtinued on next page ) I OPPORTUNITY Page 2 *k,T GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION , OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK aERSONS PAYING TAXES (T ) 0 T 16542-1019 5. Ll12 t'eet ot' h;ast ~ 0/L. H. Williams 135 feet of West % 69 anci west 4~ teet o ' ~ Lincoln H. Williams E. 10715 B'Way Ave:South 137 feet of kst loU t'eet ot' West% 0 T 16542--1020 6 -j/ 5 Ot' W% ~XI;h Y'1' ~ 0 M. Adamson ~ W 212 . 2 feet and 5. 2121'eet ~ Raymond F. Adamson 207 7th St. Cheney, 99004 ~,//36--g 69 0 T ~ ~Q 16542-1022 I// Alm W. 4O I- r; O I. b --alp hdJ13-122840-2 150.85 fe . et EXCEPT E ~ ~r lu t,eet ana txutr,z T Pac lst Fed. Savings &I West 148 feet 69 Loan Association ~ o ~ T 16542-1023 ^ ~ ~ouLn ~ oz w ya z e?L p D.)dr. Jo nson '--~j I /f"/, of E 2, EXCEPT ' • kA/ea lst Mtg. Corp K F 16573 S South 150 t'eet 69 0 , r T 16542-1024 b 15U Y-eet ot' West 0 Alflen Knoles 98 feet of East % Allen N. Krioles E. 1080 B'Wa 9 6 ~ 5 y 9 ~ 0 GILLINGHAMS 1ST ADDITIdV T 16542-1034 0 Ii. J. J~ an p Q ~ T~ p~ R. J. Julian E. 10815 B' Way Lot 1 2 0 T , 16542-1036 ~ y 0' Vbert Gillingham , . \~,,/-Robert Gillingham E. 10903 Mallon Ave Isot 2 3 I ~ i ~ GILLINGHAMS 1ST ADDITION . • , Page 3 LAS.T GR.ANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITIOPI , Or ' i ITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 T 16542-1037 0 Rq4rt Gillingham q /Robert Gillingham E. 10903 Mallon Ave Lot 3 3 ~ 0 OPPORTUNITY TRACT 92 T 16543-03.53 a N. 1d2 feet of N Z 0 Iiichard D. Jorden A/, EXCEPT East • \f 3 acres T1. lst Nat'1 Bank C'52 Jordan Richard D 0 T 16543-0156 W. 2 acres of' E. j f 0 E/est A. Keepings; Patj,icia Keeping i,aCroix; acres of N. 2j EXC~PT ~ Tru tee E. .5' and EXCE.~~1~ ~.Patricia La Croix ~ E. 10724 B'Way Street , 0 , ; T ~-t--~~~L,~~;~~~_~~ 16543.-0171 ' N. ot' h;. t52. 0 B.H. Campbell ~ of W. 2 acres of ' E. j acres ot' iv . T Columbia Mortgage FNMA 352 169 A.J. EXCEPT Street ~ ~t , 0 I ' T 16 5 43 - 017 2 ' t . u2 .5 i, eet or we t e pPK.H. Campb6ill Gk'/ 6 2 acres of E. I ac~es ; ~ or- iv~ Billie H. Campbell E. 10810 BTWay ~ North 175 feet. 0 , T 16 5 4 3 - 017 5 4 - ~ • ~ ~ ~ N . ~ lu,~l-n West ot-ast p B elden V. Brewer 11 3 ac~ EXCEPT Nor~ ~h 252 reet. ~ \j T Fid. Mut. Sav. Bank 02 3-1-27142-8f~r-~`~`~- 0 , T 16543-0176 ii(,~. ~ ~v ~11 ✓~G? ~-t'~1 S. 70'~of N. 252' 0 Belden V. Brewer 7 ( c ~ 14 k ~ of Tr c;fi ~ Portlon n % ` re ~ T Fid Mut Sav Bank 3-1-27143-6 lying W. of E. 3 a s. I I ~ ~ .;r :c tL-c jL , ~f I ~ OPPORTUNITY TRACT 92 ~ - Page 4 1 LAS' GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION .OF TITLE (0) AND /1DDRESS LOTS • BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) . , . 0 O~tN ` v T 16r~4, -0,187 X'. 193 ~ Of North 0 A lt"i c e N. G i 1 mo r e R/vu Z;"Lxw~t: f n n e , t r T/'Ce M. Gilmore N. 622 University half ,AJ_Z ; 0 T - 16543-0188 ~ L. 151 I ot' Nortri p\ Arkie Lm Michaels ~i~~~~ 100 feet of the ~i 5outh halt' N. Ge o~o E. 7202 Sprague ~ OPPORTUNITY TRACT 68 o T 17 5 4 1 G p v F~ank B. Wisner y~ 4.i~ 1A ` A T Bancshares Mor gage 1 505056 ~ South 145' of Lot t-our ~ 4 ) 0 ~ . T 17541-1610_ ~ nV4 I lTr, 17"4 O I Perett V74pr \T-~-i awrEnce E. Perretti South 4708 Shaefer Rd, 0 T 17 5 41-1~ 0 I / l~ Sout~~ of the Anna Richardson ` ~'f' J t`L9 T~.t 7t, fI \N/Anna Richardson N. 815 University ✓ NE 1/4 Lot 1 0 ~T 17541-1612 Ytrl~ r SE ~XCEPT West 0bert L Ross Lc c~, ~J 80 feet of Lot 1 T Sec. Pacific Mi,gCorp 01222~4 • 0 . ~ T /1- r~ 17 541-161 ` ' ` . / ~ Q /rred R. Neal 5. Wesi-, 80 feet of the ~ Southeast quarter T Alfred R. Neal E. 10619 B'Wav of Lot 1 ~ I I I I f, ~ ► ' OPPORTUNITY TRACT 68 _ Page 5 • LA ~T GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITIOId Oi 'TITLE (0) ANU l1DDRESS LOTS BLK , PERSONS PAYI F~ TAXES (T ) . ~ , 131 o . 0 - • ~ - r T ~ 6/0 61( l~ dAwT.cA--,, 17 5 41--~rl 14 Q - ~ 0 Le~' s R. Higgiris a,,~ ~ 4~,_ 27 kWest % EXCEPT West T\ /ea lst Mortgage Corp. KV 96802s 75 feet of Lot 1 ~ 0 „ ~ 17 5 41-16)~.5~ ~ 0 . R. Brown _ _ T Commerce Mortga~;e 3796 West 75 feet Lot 1 0 ' SKYLINE jIIEW T , 17541-1618',,~ 0 /.M. Gilmore tt/° ~a ~ ~ . Tk /Fid. Mut. Sav. Bank 02 3-1-30~06-4 Lot 2 3 0 T 175,. ~1-1h,~26- ~ 0,lor D. t~e~ I .t.v ~ { T Community Savings & Loaz 55000729 ' Lot EXCEPT S 8' 3 0 OPPORTUNITY T ~ 17541-1628 , ~ ~ ~ S. lb4.lr°of East aine A. ohns o ~Icti"dQ~ ~ of Lot 2, Opportunity 68 EXCEPT WeSt yU' anici ~ Suzanne S. Smith E. 24217 Tum Tum Dr. S. 8' Lot 3 3 Liberty Lake, Wa Skyline View Rdclition 0 EXCEPT Streets -T ~ 17541-1627 WeSt yU' -Of' S. 1~41. 1 XjV H. D. Berland /;%/b~~' feet of E. 2 Lot 2, Ti,act 68 A U Y T Spokane MortGage 2516 o T ~ PECHENPAUGHS ADDITION 17544-0109 ~ I ~ 'p avia H. Reed -1y / . ~ - T Fid.~~Iut . Savi. Bank 02 3-1-27570-0 10 1. I ~ ~ I PECKENPAUGHS ADDITION " ► Page 6 LAS.T GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITIOT? 0F TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK • PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 T ~ 0 J.1. Mo r r i s o n fl-A ° T~~ /rudentail Insurance 2-0 29-8 31 Lot 11 1 0 T.~`~~n~,`~ OPPORTUNITY TRACT 93 17544-0302 / E. 00.10S 01 W. b--A . A . Thompson 420.91 of N. 203 . 71; , T Commerce Mortgage 4640 ~ EXCEPT Street 0 T 17544-0303 E. db.1b' of W. j:~X.(2' ~ .Huff ~ of North 203 . 75; ~ T Pacific Bank Mort~;age 3004597 EXCEPT Street 0 ~ T DOBRAVEJ~o2ND ADDITION 17544- 01 ~ ~ 0 " it o~p . Wi t h e r s ~ a 9 / D. Withers N. 719 Universitty Rd. Lot 1 1 on 0 y~~ ~ I'A /~~7~ e ~ ~ 1 T . ~ 17544-28,0,4 0 ~I. Wa.lker ~ X Fid Mut Sav. Bank 02 3-1-22482-3 , Lot 4 1 o , T 17544-2805 ~ 0 J mes E. Benner T\V/Pac Bank Mortgage 8 993350576 ~ Lot 5 1 I~ z, T 17544 2806 0/ohn W. Tuttle 9 ~riLot 2 1 ir wj b eglnning at trie lV~! corner ohn W. Tuttle E. 10610 B'Way Ave. of Lot 3, Block l, trace I I I I ~ Da~~AVEC 2ND AnDzTzON . Page 7 LA8T GRANTEE IN CHAlN ADDITTON OF -TIZ`LE (0) AND AaDRESS LOTS BLK ` PERSONS PAYYIVG TAXE.S (T) . ~ ~ ~ In_ a straight line ta , ~ ~ 0 a d.~stance-of 32' est ul T E. along Southerly line ' ~ ~ ~ along Easterly lin of -L-01 2--t7o T~ D T 17544-2807 'OP 0 e tt A. Bu rt`le ~ t A4 713 T~ Emmett A. Burnett ~ N. 713 University Portian of Lot 2 1 described as f~lloas: 0. beginning at North-qest _ ~y.... - corner of Lot 3, B1Lock 1~ T thence in straioht line to ' poirtt on Sauth lin af . ~ Lot 2~, d~.stc~,t~1ce D~ 32 r West of Southeast Vne rner ~ ther~ce alang East of Lat 2 to point of beginning 0 Alsa al1 of Lot 3 T 0 T I ~ ~ ~ Ot ~ . fi 0 i ~T 0 T 0 T ~ I ~ I