ZE-188-77
OFFICE QF ' iHE
1,.t;iK',,., • • r . •
1ss !4 t`
r , ! ~ j• , ~
} 4ya{ia.y a t
PI..ANPJI«G DFpAR11'"EM
~
1 '
DATE ~I('tnf]Pl^ 25 19 ,
~bc5
SP OKANC COUnTr COURT NOUiC
T0: files ZE-188-77 and ZC-142-77
FRpM: Pat Frankovic, Assistant Zoning Administrato4~
$LRJECT: Freeway Commercial Zoning for Red Lion expansion not part of Commercial
Loning tor Valley Mall ~dlacK).
Resolution f,inalizing Freeway Commercial Zone of 188-77 was adopted on March 9, 1978. ,
The beginning of file 142-77 was in January 1976 as file ZE-61-75 and at that time
included that property eventually zoned Freeway Corrmercial by file 188-77 at-the
subsequent 1978 date. When Valley Mall was resubmitted as file 142-77 its legal
description also included that property already zoned Freeway Commercial. The
advertisement for 142-77 stated 'reclassification from Agricultural to Commercial
' for that property described as....' The advertisement didn't include any property,
such as file 188-77,that was zoned Freeway Commercial. Additionally, the extension
of time for 142-77 did not contain the ownership of 188-77 (Red Lion). Condition
of 142-77 stated that if an extension of time was not granted in 1985, then the
zoning would revert back to what it was prior to the Commercial Zone.
For the above reasons, it appears that file 188-77 and the Freeway Commercial Zone
still exists and was not legally changed to Commercial by file 142-77.
THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR FILE 142-77 IS AS WRITTEN BY THOMPSON LAND SURVEYORS ON
OCTOBER 2, 1985.
= I NTEROFF I CE P'EMO = MB10RANDUW CCHECK ONE BaDJ
.
~ THOMPSON LAND SURVEYORS
EAST 113 MAGNES[UM ROAD, SUITE "C"
SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99208
TELEPHONE (509) 466-7241
~
October 2, 1985
LAND DESCRIPTION FOR JAMES S. BLACK COA4PANY
Job N° 85031
That portion of the N12 of Section 13, Township 25 North, Range
44 East of the Willamette Meridian, Spokane County, Washington
described as follows:
GOMMENCING at a point 20 feet North and 30 feet East of the SW
corner of said N/2; thence S 89° 51' E along the north line of
Broadway Avenue, a distance of 2930.7 feet to the Point of BE-
GINNING; thence N 89° 51' W along said north line a distance of
2930.7 feet to a point on the east line of Sullivan Road; thence
North along said east line, a distance of 649.32 feet; thence
East 784.3 feet; thence North 665 feet to a point on the south-
erly line of Primary State Highway N° 2(Interstate 90), thence
easterly along said southerly line to a point which bears N 0°
17' 30" E from said Point of Beginning; thence S 0° 17' 30" W
to said Point of Beginning.
~W.~'.
.J'.•~~o~
3sy O~ ~ ~
~ 181
.
•o
.
. • s'
~~o•E.w,,, ,
OFFICIAL LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ZE-142-77 AS REQUIRED IN PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CONDTTION 5 OF HEC's FINDINGS DATED OCTOBER 3, 1985 FOR ZE-142-77.
Steve P. Horobiowski
Zoning Administrator
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING • MAPPINO • PBRMIT PREPARATION • CONSTRUCTION STAKINO
WUNOARY • R1aHT-0F-WAY • TOPOORAPHIC • HYDROOMPHIC • CABLE/CONDUIT OflSIGN
OFFiCE 0F THf .
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING r~~~~~~~~~T
1PI Date February 5 119 80
7o FILES, ZE-188-77 and ZE-49-68
From-___ h9arcia Pl. Raines, Zoning Administrator ~Subject Intent of Zoning Resolutions Authorizing Changes in Zoning Maps.
Zoninq Reclassification, ZE-49-68, was finalized on April 17, 1969, per
Board of County Commissioners' Resolution #69-135, changing the Zoning
Map from Agricultural to Freeway Commercial zoning classification.
This zoning was for property on the east side of Sullivan Road, south of
the Freeway, and became the site for the Red Lion Plotor Inn.
Zoninq Reclassification, ZE-188-77, was finalized on March 9, 1978, per
Board of County Commissioners' Resolution #78-308, changing the Zoning
Map from Agricultural to Freeway Commercial zoning classification.
This zoning was for property east of the previously zoned site, ZE-49-68,
to provide area for expansion of the Red Lion. Inadvertently, when the
zoning resolution was prepared for the latter proposal, ZE-188-77, the same
legal description was used as for the first approval. However, the iegal
advertising and the legal description on the agenda aiere correct for this
second parcel of property to be rezoned. Therefore, we believe the map
should reflect both zonings as correct, ZE-49-68 and ZE-188-77 in Section 13,
Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M., Spokane County, Irlashington. cmtN
r
S ' PIC REF. #
, .
~ sw'~cp Wmw-r~
THRESHOLD DETERMINATIO~+'
~ ~ , i ' ~ •
D EC LARAT IO N O F
(proposed/tinal)
'.rO.aNC COljti • C~JNr ti.:.5r ~
(significance/non ignificvance)
1 . Description of Proposal:
B '
~
2. Proponent:
U
3. Con:act Person: Phone•
4. County Action(s) Requested:
~ d- ~ 4. Cr
S. Location of Proposal: T- ~PU
4
6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
This proposal has been d-termin~e~y. to ~Z~ have a significant adverse impact on
P~-~ required under RCW 43 .21C .030(2) (c). This
the environment. An EIS is, '
c?ecision was made after revYew by the County of a completed environmental checklast
and oth-r informari(in on file with the lead aqency.
Responsible Official:
Proposed Declaration: ' Final Declaration:
(name) 1C:)--?C.`7 (name)
,
(sicrnature):'%' (sianature)
(title) ~f ZiI~ (title) (deDt.) t'~L(dept.)~J~ 64 (20 LO VW Vif1.
(date) (date)
' Dapartmr.nt Reference No.: .
(See Reverse Side)
For Declarations of Significance Only:
Date of ExpECted Draft EIS Availability
(determined by Responsible Official)
Date Entered in "FIS in Preparation RegistPr"
(determined by SCPA Public Information Center)
To be completed by responsible official:
a. Briet description and listing of those en,7ironmEntal impacts leading to such
declaration:
b• Brief explanation of what measures, if any could be taken by the applicant to pre-
vent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that
the responsible officlal could consider a revised proposal with a possible re-
sulting declaration of nonsignificance:
For Proposed Declarations of Nonsignificance Only:
Date Entered "Proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance
Register" (determined by SEPA Public. Information Center)
Date comments to be received (15 day review period)
(determined by SEPA Public Information CPnter)
10. SEPA Public Information Center:
(For departments of General Government only)
Approved a s to form
( ) Disapproved as to form
Reasons: Signature of SEPA PIC Officer:
Date:
A
~ .
N0. 78 3GS
ZE-188-77
IN THE MAATTER OF CHANGING 7.'HE ZONING MBcP )
FRQM AGRICULTURAL TO FRFEWAY COMMERCIAL )
ON PROPERTY LOCATED IN SECTION 13, ) R E S 0 L U T I 0 N
TOWNSHIP 25 N., RANGE 44, E.4J.M . )
SPQKA.NE COUNTY9 WASHINGTON. )
The above-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County
Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the
Board that the Spokane County Planning Commission has given due notice of the hearing
on the matter in the manner and for the time provided by law; that said Planning
Commission has held a public hearing as required; and that the said Planning Commission
concurrs in the plan to zone the following described property as:
FREEWAY COMMERCIAL
The North 655 feet of the West 524.3 feet of the SW 14 of the NW 14 of Section 13,
Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. Spokane County, Washington.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the above-described property be, and the sarne
is zoned under the classification of FR.EEWAY COMMERCIAL as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance of Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amended.
AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that any development on the above-described property sha11
be subject to the followl.ng conditions:
1) The applicant shall submit copies of a revised Development and Traffic Control
Plan to include the proposed expansion, existlng uses, parking, sign structures
and screening (landscaping) to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator prior to
release of Building Permit.
2) The planned expansion an.d parking shall be devebped in substantial conformance to the
Development and Traffic Control Pl an.
3) That ari ornamental masoruy wall 4 1/2 feet ln height or a planted hedge (consisting
of plants chosen to rapidly reach that height) be installed by the applicant, five
feet in from the property line on the south perimeter of the property (access
driveways excepted) and that the south property line be completely and permanently
landscaped wlth low evergreen shrubs. Trees may be included in such landscaping,
provided their location and species are approved by the Spokane County Zoning
Administrator. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installe d within the
required landscape areas.
4) A sewage disposal system sha11 be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County
Health District prior to subrnittal of applications for building permits.
5) Installation of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the requirements of the
Dlstrict Fire Chief.
6) The applicants shall also be required to comply wzth all other conditions of
approval for Zone Reclassification ZE-49-68.
7) That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and the
Board of County Commissioners, Resolution No. 77-1392 be accomplished by the
Project Applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Board of County
Commissioners, as lnstructsd by the Planning Department Staff.
PASSES BY THE BOARD THIS ~ DAY OF , 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
~ O UnT1919%part
.
r -
-
1
ATTEST :
VF ~J . OHLAND
C f the a
BY:
Thls is tify that thi is a true
and correct copy of Rcsolution
No. 78 passed by the
Bo d his day of
BY:
Deputy
I hereby certify that I have posted the
above changes and revisions on the Zoning
Map in the Building Codes Department, and
do fur-ther certify that the zone classifi-
cation change is the same as described above
and shown on the attached map.
SIGNED: r%~E
DATED: 4~N&
.
,ONE CHANGES POSTED ON ZO 1G MAPS
Application No. Res. No. 'T% -'50% Res. Date ' 1~l,Qg
From: czic ULTV pj-~., To: P2FEklA~1 CQHN~ 2c/ AL..
Posted By: Date Posted:
/
Acres: Sec. 13 Two. Range yy
EAST
(Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000'
~
(Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
. -
(Wall Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400'
(File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000'
f
(File Map) Metro #11 (Director's Office) Scale: 1" - 2000'
~Q (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile
~ (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles
(Score Card) Middle Office
SOUTH EAST
(Wall Map) Buildinq Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Wa'1 Map) Front Office Scale: 1' - 1000'
(Wzi11 Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 400'
(Fi1P Map) Tracina 434 (SoL~h East Zoning Maps) Scale: - 1000"
(File Map) 1VIetrQ 411 (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2 000'
(File Map) Countv- F'ront Off ice Scale : 1"- 1 mile
(File Map) County (?Vlap Room) Scale : 1" - 2 mile s
(Score Cards) Middle Office
SP4KANE CGUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
North 800 jefferson
Spukanal, Vti ash:ngton 99201
January 13, 1978
Honorablo Board of County Commissioners
Spokane County Court House
Spokane, VIrA 99201
Gentlemen:
At the regular hearing of the Spc.~kane rounty Plar.ntng k:c-mmission on
FrLday, january 15, 1978, at 8;30 A.M. to 12;10 P.Mo, rzcoi v,ining at 1:35 P.M.
to 7:70 P.M. in Conference Room "A", County Cotirt House Attnex. The enclosed
actlon was taken and ts recommended to the Board of County Covicnissioners.
I~~embers present: Ivr, NcCoury, Nirs. Byrne, Nrs. RdVilIl1~S, N~ssrs.
IViatn, Quig tey an3 2'homzs. Plannlr.5 Srafi' present: Rethards, ".Ve:z;cer, Fergen,
lVosher, Wesche and justice. Eng-tneaer's Qfilce: Finr.ey. Pau,;a GutOI"s Offlce:
Emac to .
~ incere ly,
SPOt:ANE C4UIJTY ?LArJN.T,rJG C'0MMISSION
TEL° NC COURY, C'hairman
FRED L. DAYHAkSH, 01rector oi ?.3r.ning
FLD:kj
Officlal mtniutes and record of act'_on taken
by the Spokane County Pia nn;.ng
Commission at rhelr :eRUlar hraring f:eld
on januarf 131, 19780
IVIINUTES OF THE PTyANNING COIViNiISSION HEARING OF XANUARY 13r 1978
WHERF.AS, the Spokane County Planning ,ommtsslon dtd hold a public meetlnq
on january 13, 1978 to con.sider the tc:st!mony and requests of several appllcants,
objectors and other tnterested partles concQrning the beiow referenced zone classl-
flcatton upg:adings, and other tterr;s oI business, and
VVHEREAS, at said hearing opportunlty was afforded those favoring and those
opposing all ltems of buslness, and
VliHEREAS, Mr. N?cCoury, N'rs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawlings, IVlessrs. N_a►n,
Qutgley and Thomas were In attendance and constttuted a quorum, and
V'JHEREAS, tne Spokane County Planning Commission fully considered the testl-
mony gtven, the environmental review, and all other evidence presented, recommends
to the Board of County Commissioners the following:
~ e Coptes of the revtsed draft of the Short Plat Ordinance were distributed to
members of the Commisslon. Comments have been received from the public
on the context of the Ordtnance, and the Commisslon wlll make a decision at
its hearing on jantiary 20th.
2. The Staff presented a progress report on cltlzen partictpatlon !n the various
Advisory Counc! l meetings. A new publtcation, "Insight", was dlstrtbuted
to the members, giving an uo-to-date announrOmcnt of forthcom'Lng events
and general lnformatlon of publlc interest.
3. It was the consensus of oplnton amo;Ig the Commtsston that future hearings
would commence at 8:30 a,m, for Commission business, and the general
public hearlr,g would follow at 9:00 a,m. These ~peclftc ~im-s w~uld be
followed for the remalr.der of 1978.
4s Reference was made to the prevlously dlsc,iss,:d Item of inrerlm zoning; howeve:
the Staff has not received any directlves from tho 8ozrci oi Ccunty Vommis-
sloners as to lts status at the presen* ttme.,
5. Reference was made to the study being cor.d:icted hy R. W. Bec:k ard Co.
of 5eattle on an tntcrlm policy on t1he sowage questlon. A p.rplii-:i nary report
has been prepared, and the Roard of County Gornmissioners is sc,nedu:ed to
cecelve the flnal data shortly.
6. It was relkerated that ttie 5-I-11le g_oup had prposed to c,':aosA a new plan ln
appioxlmately two weeks to repia: e the altern3tives wh!ch have been taktng the
study gi-oup aimost two years to prepara.
7. It was directed that a lett-er ko thc: County Utili~ tes IDepartment and the Health
Distrtcc be di-afted snowln7 the Planr.ing C.omm! ssion conccrns in regards to
the tiliest Plains lbafier siruatlor..
- 1 -
8. Z-JE-112-76, AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL: INDUSTRIAL
DEVELOPN'!ENT CGMPANY. That the zone reclassification upgrade be approved
to the Restricte,-l Industrial Zonc ClasSlficatlon (F[le Number ZE-112-76),
subject to the Staff's ftndlnqs, dated january 13, 1973 with the changes as
follows: Omlt all of SA and the thtrd sentence tn 03 of the Staff's recommendec
condittons. (Ivlotion by iJ)r. Trlo:nas seconded by Nar. Culgley. Vote was
4 yes and 1 no.) It was suggclsted to the sponsor that hc seek annexation lnto
a water dlstrtct.
9. It was the concensus of the Commission that the Staff make a report ln six
months on desl9u standards to the Commission.
10. ZV~F-140-77, AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTEI.• INDUSTRIAL: CHOPOT. That
the zone reclassification upgrade be denied. (Mr. Iv:atn moved, IV:rs . Byrne
secondcd. The vote was 5 yes and 1 no.)
11. ZE-180-77, AGRICULTUFtAL TG COMMERCLAL CR FREEWAY COMMERCIAL: BLAC
That the zone reclassification upgrade ba approved to the Freeway Commercial
zone Classtftcation (File NUmber 2E-188-77), subject to the Staff's ftndings,
dated january 13, 1578 wlth the added condltion that an adequate sewerage
dlsposal system be approved by the County Heal[h Authortties and and any othe;
necc:ssary agenctes prfor to the Lssuance of anj bullding permits. A1so the
uxlsting landscaptng ls to be cantinued to include this proposal.
12. 2-_W-108A-77, AGRICULTUAL TG FREE'JVAY CGNMEP.CIAL: CCX. That the
zon4 reclassification upgrade be approved tho the Freeway Commerclal Zone
Classtficatlon (File Numbe;r Z'4-108A-77), surj,~ct to the Staff's findtngs,
dated January 13, 1978. (IVir. Qutgley moved and Mr. Iv.aln seconded. Vote
was 5 yes and 1 no. )
13. Thcre was a motton by Tv?rs. Rawltngs and seconded by Nlrs. Byrne on a request
an ovcrvtew study of the "v• est Plains I-roa,(Vot;; was unanimous.)
14. GN-109-77, 1'~GRICULTURAL TG I~~II~ING C~ .SS II, S& F CONSTRUCTION CO.
That the zone reclasslficatlon upgrade Le c~~ncinued to such time as we deter-
mf ne conditlons to be lmpos::d f or the rehalbi litatlon of this arca. That the
Planning Staff in cooperatLon wlth the proposer dev~.~l.op a rehabilttatlon plan
for discusston at a future mceting catlod by the commtsston, publlc meeting.
That the rehabilitatlon plan lnvolvc sotl rcplacement, grass planttng, tree
and vegetation replacement. That the proposed area be reduced by 500 fect at
a mintmum at the north end. (lvir. 1`horrias moved, i: r. CCuigley seconded.
Vote wa s 5 ye s to 1 no.)
Planning Staff present: 3ethards, Swettzer, Fergen, :-v~oshPr, vvesche anrl justlce.
Englneer's Office: Ffnnuy. Prosecutor's Gffice: Emucio.
DATED THIS 19TH DAY GF JANL'ARY, 2978.
BY: KATHLEFN jUSTICE
Plannlnrj Cor,misslon Secretary
For: Ted Iv_cCoury, Chalrman
Fred L. Dayharsh, 1-1irector of Planning
,
.
FINDINGS
ZONE CHANGE
ZE-I88-77, Aqricultural to Commerciai or Freewav Commercial: Black
I. BACKGROUND:
Zone Change ZE-49-68
On November 14, 1968, Kebob, Inc, submitted zone reclassffication request
ZE-49-68, Agricultural to Freeway Commercial for a 7.8 acre parceil. located
on the east side of Sullfvan Road between Broadway Avenue and the Spokane
Valley Freeway, I-90 ,
The appiicants proposed a 119 unit motel, restaurant, lounge, and service
sfiation, and were given a Planning Commissfon approval of their request,
minus the service station, on December 12, 1968; Final approval was granted
by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County on Aprfl 17, 1969.
Then on 4ctober 30, 1969, the Pianning Commissfon approved the service
station portion of ZE-49-68, Amendment (Supplement) to approved development
and Traffic Control Plan v
Expansion Of Lampiighter Lodge, (Red Lion Motor Inn)
' In 1Vlarch of 1975, The Lamplighter Lodge (Red Lion Motor•Inn) made applica-
tion for a Zoning Adjustor Special Conditional Use Pernnft, SPE-5-75, Amend-
ment to the Freeway Commercial Development and Traffic Control Pian for
ZE-49-68. The applicants proposed to enlarge the existing 119 unit motel
with 40 additional units, and to expand the restaurant, lounge and banquet
room facilities, and were given Zoning Adjustor approval of this request on
March 31, 1975 0
Zone Change ZE-188-77
- ZE-188-77, Agrfculfiur-al to Commercial or Freeway C ommetcial, is a zone
reclassification request for a 3.6 acre parcel located adjacent and to the
east of the existing Red Lion Motor Inna The applicants are proposing a new
82 unit motei addition to the Red Lion, with a possibility of a future and
~ second 82 unit additfono Proposal fs for a Freeway Commercial expanston.
II o SU?VIMARY:
a . Agricultural to Commercial
The applicant's proposal is compatible wfth surrounding land uses; is in-
consistent with recent Planning Commtssion Zone reclassifications; is in-
consistent with the Regional Comprehensive plan; has or can provide adequate
provisions for circulation, sewage disposal, water and fire protection.
- 3 -
.
,
~ ZE-188-77, Aqricultural to Commercial or Freeway Commercfal
b o Agricultural to Freeway Commercial
The applicant's proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses; is consisten
with recent P1anning Commissfon Zone reclassifications; is conststent with
regulations and standards set forth 1n the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance,
and the text portfon of the Comprehens ive Plan relative to land use appro-
priateness; has or can provide adequate provisions for circulation, sewage
disposal, water and fire protection.
III. GENERAI, INFORMA'I'ION:
A, Exist ing Land Us e- S ite - Vaca nt
To the north Spokane Valley Freeway - I-90
To the sauth Vacant property; proposed site of Regional Commerctal
Shopping Center.
To fihe east Vacant property; proposed site of Regional Commercial
Shoppf.ng Center,
To the west Motel, Restaurant, Lounge, (Red L1on Motor Inn),
Service Station.
B. Zoning H i story of Area
Request Date Action Taken
To the north Spokane Valley Feeway - I-90
To the south Agricultural 3-27-42 Approved
To the east Agricultural 3-27-42 Approved
To the west Freeway Commercial 4-17-69 Approved
C o Comprehensive Plan
I. Aqricuitural to Commerc ial
Proposal Is inconsistent with the Regional Comprehensfve Plan Viapa
- Explanation: The Regional Comprehensive indicates the stte as being
appropraite for residential uses.
2. Agricultural to Freeway Commercial
The applicant's proposal is consfstent with regulations and standards
set for th in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, and the Text
portion of the Comprehensive Piaa relative to land use approprfateness
for Freeway Commercial sites o
-3A-
f ,
ZE-188-77, Actricultural to mmercfal or Freeway Commerc' ,
,
IVo SPECIAL INFORMATION:
A a C irculation
Frontaqe Type ADT
Sullivan Road Major Arterfal 11, 500
Engineer's Review:
WashinQton State HiQhway Department
• Thls office would not oppose the proposed rezone, but would reconunend
that no additional access approaches be allowed. There Is a proposed
revis ion of Sullivan Road Interchange to include signalization of ramp
terminals and in light of this the proQosed rezone will not increase
traffic congestion so as to break down the desfgn of the Sullivan
lnterchange.
Office of Spokane Countv Enqineer
The proposed Freeway Commercial expansion will use existing approved
motel access approaches opposfte Mfsston Avenue which does provide
for proper handling of traffic onto Sullivan Road.
B. Sewage Disposal -
The exfsting sewage treatment system is not adequate to serve the
proposed 82 unit motel additiono An adequate sewage disposal system
shall be reviewed and approved by the Spokane County Health District
and appropriate Health Authorfties prior to submlttal of applications
for buildfng permfts for the proposed expansiono
C. Water
Avatlability through Vera Water and Power
D. Flre Protection
Fire Mains - need to be installed
Fire Hydrants - need to be installed
E. Staff Environmental Review
Concluded that a deciaration of TVon-Significance be issued.
V. C ONDITIO NS :
The Planning Department Stafr feels the following conditions would be appro-
priate if the proposal is approved.
1. The applicant shall submit coptes of a revised Development and Traffic
Control Plan to include the proposed expansion, existing uses, parking,
. sign structures and screening (Iandscaping) to the Spokane County
Zoning Admini strator prior to final approvaL af-Z£-1_88- 77 .
• ' ~ ~
-3B- °
r
~
~ ZE-188-77, Agricultural to Commercial or Freewav Commercfal
Z, The planned expansion and parking shall be developed in substantfal
conformance to the Development and Traffic Control Plan o
3. That an ornamental maaonry wall 4 1/2 feet in height or a planted
hedge (consisting of plants chosen to rapidly reach that height) be
installed by the applicant, five feet in from the property line on the
south perimeter of the property (access driveways excepted) and that
the south property lfne be completely and permanently landscaped with
low evergreen shrubs. Trees may be included in such landscapfng,
provided their location and spectes are approved by the Spokane County
Zoning Administrator. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed
within the required landscape areas.
4. A sewage df sposal system shall be reviewed and approved b y the
Spokane County Health District prior to submittal of applications
for building permits.
5 a Installation of fire malns and hydrants in acconiance with the require-
ments of the District Fire Chief.
6. The applicants shall also be required to comply wtth all other condi-
tfons of approval foc Zone Reclas sffication ZE-49-68.
7. That the provisions of SEPA's NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43,21c.080
RCW and the Board of County Commissioners, Resolution No. 77-I392
be accomplished by the Project Applicant within thirty (30) days of
formal action by the Board of County Cornmissioners, as tnstructed by
the Planning Department Staff,
--3C-
.
~
~
~
y
~ ~
. + ~ 3-6 dC p1~.OP4 Y ~6okgCIA1'
1~ c~ FgEE ~ E~A~SION c~..
• A.~ C~~ . , .
. t ~ ,~.E . •
. • , ~
• „s~
• ,
~ ' "'t ' • ~1~, ~ 1~ ~ _
, ~r~-.~;° ~ ~
`n~ r ; i~i •ft t
$rt~ , { ~ ^ P
• - " ` r `b ' yi ~ ~
a ~
~,~,~r,. .~A'w w. • 1
~ ' f •'~:;~f' ' ~ `;:.N' , 1 ~ ~
• R ~ ~
M
'
/I~~
~,y 1 4. L ' 1 3
°
~ ~M/ ~ , I'• a f~~•
1
' j . ~ .
lp '~~l, ',~~I~Jl~,. ~ rj~•' • ` ` ~...i ' ~'""`~'~~_a""
f ~ '\►1 ' `n " 5 Po., A N ~ ~ ~
/ ~a~ ' ~ ~ Y .~y ~ • r,~ ~r~,
~ • t~ ~ ~ • , ' ~ - t ,
. ~I ~ f• ~t, ' ~ ~ ;N , L~ ~ ' ~ , , ~ '
. . .
~
' . .~►~a:l 1 - t ~ .
~ , - x ~ '
~ • ~ . ~ , ~
i . ' 6.
~ ~ t r
.
, , • ~ ` i + , ~ . tif'J V.r+~ ,,,.,.r"'
1 ~ 1 ' y~ F • ,
~ ~ . > ~r► '~M ~5 7~~ ~
7 ~ } ' ~ t ~ ~ ~ r-+"~~ h!~"! ~+N^' . e c ' i ~i 1 . I ' p ,
) ~ t ..~lk ^r 1~'n" t, y' ,m y , • ,
, ~t ' V;`"'..~ ` ~,r ° , }t , , , . • M,~ ,'i3'~. i ~ , ~,r~t ~ ~ `~_1.~...--~-^-" "
~ x S 4 ~„~..~,,,,«-r ~ ~5 ' . ' , ~ . . ; • o " ~
wA ` _ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~,,...,e-~'_"""`.,-.
~ ~ ',r , . y, ~ ► :
_ - ' , t . , . • _
~ ~ J v~[D
. .
,
' JAN 2 5 1978
~r3r I I\ ~ ~ C
MJ; I
SPOKANE COUN''Y PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS BUILOING N 911 JEFFERSON STREET
~i
PHONE 458-2274
Tl SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99201
SPOhANL COUhfY t,UURT Ho„5E M E M O RA N DU M ,
- 0,BR~ ~~R Ad~t Cov ~
~)cFJ
T O: SPo L,6 E103I q° S(~~?'Vu c
~ j~ S I~L S ~ A O t
i D rM 3' U S i U S Arnv; S G3?J - i Rt7Vi?t 14 N i
F R O M: Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 jefferson Spokane, WA 99201
509-456-2274
Attention; REF E R E N C E: Lead Agency Designatfon, Proposed Declaratiqn of Non-
significance, Environmental Checklist, etc.
,
Pursuant to WAC 197-10- 20 3(3), the Spoka ne County Planning Department, a
division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING ,
AGENCY, f s the LEAD AGENCY for the follow~ng proj ect:
~Z.4~ -7
,
The following ls explanation for thls determination:
,
s ,
z
Informatlon on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be
an AGENCY OF jURISDICTION, WAC 197-10-040 (4) .
.
Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to revlew and comment as pro-
vtded in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advi.sed that the proposal was li5ted
in the SEPA Public Information Center bn: ,
. .
' . .
SEPA PIC REF. # Pl- 'Z~` l C1 7;;7
~
THRESHOLD DETERMINATIOIv
97~
D E C L.A RAT I O N O F
(proposed/d~nf~
~ ~ ~9 e .
Z,rUnaHt COUnl
~
(significance/non ignificance)
1 . Description of Prouosal
,
2. Proponent 3. Contact Person
Phone 0-12
4• County Ac[ion(s) Requested G~~ YLQ d
o
5. Location of Proposal
~
,
-
,
. a 6. Lead Aqency Sp4KANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
This proposal has been determine to '7Z&7 have a significant adverse ~mpact Qx►
the environment. An EIS is''j required under RCW 43.21C.030(2) (c) . This , r,,.1, ,
decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmPntal checklie~,
and othpr informatiun on file with the lead agency.
r
7 ~ Responsible Official
j
Proposed Declaratian Final Declaration ,
(name) /1::), A S (namel_AU"M9~/
t
xc naturel S (sianature)
(tikle) !F t- iZ7 /Q (title) O-MAII'~ b"A-A) .
(de t ex eo. eQywnA v
(deatr) t-~Lt9-dUV/1Cl
(date) I 11g'17e? (date) .
Da-partmont Reference No.
(See Reverse Side)
D
1
f •
AE:111~t~:~-~~;~.~`.~..:
DEPT. FILE REF.
I ss
I"M
'P°"ti"` `°""TY ``U"' "°USf STAI'F REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. Tn accordance with the Spokane County Envzronmental Ordinance and WAC 197--10,
an Environmental Checkllst has been submitted by the applicant or his agent.
This checklist and any additlonal pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed
by th e ~~PtZ4
~ a The following data briefly describes the proposal•
A, Action Requested: ,
a
aejp
B. Description of Proposal•
, A
c~~, ~'UI~ ~?-~.~L~ n~~►~l~
4 . ,
}
C. Location of Proposal:
*
,
t . ,
.
a ~ ~ - • L• ~ 7 ~
'
II . Review of Checklis t.
,
A. Slighr adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: '
,
~4 -/725-?e Gt/- , . . ~kdd_4~- ,
. ,
C'o~ J-AtD ~I-r-v v/ eczs ,
r.
. . ,
i
, ' [ 1
(OYer)
~
f
, r
der the follovvin9
s are n°tied ~n . ,
t adv erse irr'pa~t ~ .
~
S nif ~can -
ig
poten ~ ~►z~ > _ _
uestio~'s .E
c~ - r---~,'r
, , .
; e ~ • r~'~'r
v
~ T
, -
a ,
J s
~„~"r• ~
a ~ ~ J y ~ Ye
Cs ,~dentlfled ~`b° ~ ~ ~ -
sian o f ~mFac
,
♦
l
~ 4
~
•
1 ,
' G • ~
, ~ . ' '
o p ~,,,,r s
v
.
~ ~ ~ . .
~ '
IL.~
- tlons
~nda f
S and Reco,~n abovE ~~he staf
conclusn I,~ A ~ B and G
ZI~. . ~
Ba S'~d O
,
r ,
. At said time a.nd place any interested person may appear for, or against, the granting
of this application.
ACxENDA, JANIIARY 13, 1978 TFLEPHQNE NO.: 456-2274
SFOKANE COIINTY PLANNIlVG CQMHIISSION
Time : Frz.day, Janu.ary 13, 1978 8.30 A.M.
Place: Conference Room A, Court House Annex
(Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ~ ^ ~
3. ZE-188-77, Agricultural to Commerc3al or Freewa,y Commercial
a. Location: Section 13, Township 25 N., Ra.age 44, E.W.M.
Begi.nning at the NW corner of the SW A of the
NW 34; th. N 89a. 25' 13" E, 544.30 feet along the N line of sa1.d subdivz.sion
to the true point of begln.ning; th. continuing along said line, North 890
25'13" East, 240 ft; th. S 00'057,43" E, 655000 ft; th. S 89025'13" West,
240 ft; th N 00c57' 43" W. 655.00 ft to the true pt. of beginn3.ng.
b. Applicant: James S. Black
500 Columbia Builcis.ng
Spokane, WA
c. Site Size: 3.6 Acres
d. Existing Zoning: Agricultural
e. Proposed Zoning: Commercial or Freeway Commercial
f. Proposed IIse of Property: Expansion of Motel
g. Application of Zoning Provzsion: Chapter 4.219 Section 4.21.040
h. Envz.ronmental Impact: A topic of cLiscussion at this he,~ring ma,y be
whether or not ~h'___i~~nosal wi,.ll have a
signl.fica.nt adverse envzronmental impact.
~ ~eR so
- - ~ •
^ - - ~ -
i
•
~ • 1
Ss'oy
aR
~ ; • N* 4
.
O
rr ~
~ BROApWAY AvE
. 13 ' Y ~ Fir~ ~
oyresl F'°AI • Station
hoo I 1 Q
• ► ~ o
• ~ o
O _~CC riot y a4f
~ - , S~ ~?~i00)
t ~ p
> -
,
VA LLEYWA`r ~ VAL L M_
-j-
c
_
, t
~ •
.
,,frI
,
0 ~
,
SPOKANE COUH7♦ COUpt NUUSt
i
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
In[roduction The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43,21C, RC'JV, requires all state and local governmental agencieS to consider environmental values `both for their own aceions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires
that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the environment. The
purpose of this checkllst is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not'a '
proposal is such a ma jor action.
,
,
~
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybq" if, in your,
opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklisC will be
aware of and concern themselves with the deqree of impact, asking you for more informa--
tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision--makers, include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You shauld
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are ~
relevant to the answars you provide. Complete answers to these qyestions now will
help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental °
raview without unnecessary delay,
,
s ~
The following questions apply to your total prQposal, not jusk ko the 1lcense for w~tch ,
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval i,s sought. Xour answerj
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal When it Ia rQmpleked,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future 1 This will clllqw all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future,'
r
No application shall be processed until the. checklist has been completed 4nd, rsturned
to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for overy "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form May be r@qulred to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed iriformation ,
to aid in a threshold determination.
NOTE. This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State , s
of WashinBton #or various typep of proposals. Many of the questionp m0y r}qt
apply to your propoeal, If a questlon doos not apply, just answer it "no'"' ~~d
~
continue on to the next question.
,
+ + ~ i4 a
t y
S ' t r ~I; l
J
` V1 e ti ;
~r , Y tti
T X .1 t
ENVIRaNMENTA iC~iF,.~KLIST F(JRN~
♦ 5 ~
tY ~ ' 71 r 4 r ~ i', ~•ri
t r
I, BACKGROUND ~
1. Name of Proponent: James S. Black
, . ~
. ,
2. Address and Phona Number of ProPonent , .t. ~ 500 Col umbi a Bui 7 d7 ng, Spo~ane, Washington 99204
, r
. ' . ~ ~ ~
838-2511
3. Date Checklist Submitted. November 15,, 1977
4. Agency Requiring Checklisti $g„qkane C~ri vT Wa
r
5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable. t ~
,
Expansion of motel
j J
H r
{ rs r
,
,
aF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUAT4, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,)
Yes M lybe No
9. Flora. Will the proposal result in
(a) C'iange in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? . , , , . , , X
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any u-iiqUe, rare or
endanqered species of flora ? , , , . . . , , , , , , X
(c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to rhe normal replenishment of X
existing species ? . . . . . . , . . , , , , . , . _
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop X
Explanation
Yes Mzybe No
~ 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, bentnic organisms,
insects or microfauna) ? . . . . . . . . X_
~ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, ar X
endangered species of fauna ) . . . . , , . . , , ~
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or
' result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna
(d) Deterioration of existing fish or wlldlife habitat? -X-
Explana tion
,
.
i 4
t
~Ye s M be No
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels?.. _
tXplanatlon None, other tlian parking lot traffic
i
,
,
Yes Maybe No
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal prc~duce new light or glare? ~
~ , -
,
Explanation Car head lights will be buffered from residential area bv the
building. Any signs erected will face commercial areas onlv. Parkina 1QI-_
,
' 1 i qhts wi 11 be 1 ow ql are and not di rected across anv prQnertX 1ines _ Imp~ct
will be minimal
.
r
Yes Mavbe No
, 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the ~
present or planned land use of an are~~ . X _
Explanation It will alter the use from aqrlcultural to commercial. The land
has no aqricultural value and is not bein4 farmed
,
- q -
,
f i
♦
w C
0
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATL, PLEASE ATTACH ADVITIONAL PAGL'S )
Yes Mavbe No
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal ►esult in
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources , X
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natura] resource? X
Explana tion
,
~
~
Yes Ma)Lbe ~L:)
10. i o[Jaset - Does the praposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, "
but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) x
in the event of an accident or upset conditions
Explana tion '
,
~
t
~
. ~ .
,
i E
Yes Maybe No
~r ( 4
11. Population. Will the proposal altec the location,
,
distribution, density, or growth rate or the human
population of an area > . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , x
~
Explanation .
~
o ,
t~
12. Housinq . Will the proposal affect existing housing, or X create a demand for additional housing > . . . . . . . . .
5
Explanation
;
,
6
Yes Maybe No
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in >
, X
(a) Generation of additional ve►iiculcr movemPnt? . . . . .
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for t
>
new parking ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _X_ `
(G) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . e..
,
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulatian or X
movement of people and/or goods ? . , , , . . , . `
(e) Alterations to waterbome, rail or air traffic? 4-
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X
bicyclists or pedestrians ? . . . . . . . . .
Explanation Any additional vehicular movement or alterat;ons in trafflc
patterns would be to or from the street and parkinglot On-site parking
would handle the additional parking demand Impact to circulation Will be
minlmal.
-5- ,
. ~
,
~
,
(IF SPACE FOR gJ(PL1aNATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAC3ES.)
Yes Mavbe No
14. Public Services Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas
(a) Fire protection ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _
(b) Police protection ? . . . , , , , , , , , , , , ,
(c) S chool s ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . . . . X
(e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads ? X
(f) Other governmental services? . . . . . , , . . . . X _
txalanation The proposal would require the normal government services
provided to the area onl.y.
.
Yes Maybe No
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in ~
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X _
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of energy? . . , , , ,
Explanation The proposal would require normal amount of energy for heat,
liahts and air conditioninq only.
Yes Maybe No
16. Utrlities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities
(a) Power or natural gas ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(b) Communication systems? . . , . . . . , , , , , , )L
(c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
(e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . , , X
(f) Solid waste and disposal? , . . . . . . , , . . . ~
, Explanation• None, other than hookups of uti 1 i ti es
Yes Maybe No
17. Human Health. Wi11 the proposal reSLIlt in the creation of
any health hazard or potential health F izard (excluding
mental health) ? . , . . . . . . . . . . . -X-
, Explanation
-6-
.
. -
^ ~1
. -
. , ~
(IF kciPACE FOR DCPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, Pj.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Maybe No
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scenic vista or view open to the public, or wlll the pro-
posal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site
open to pub]ic view? . . , , ,
Explana tion
Yes Maybe No
19 Recreation, Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of Existing recreational opportunities ?X
Explanation
Yes Pviaybe No
20, Archeological/Histoncal, WL11 the proposal result in an
alteration of a significant archeologic«1 or historical site,
structure, ob)ect or building ?
Explanation
III. SIGNATURE
T, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are
made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be
any willful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full dlsclosure on my part, Spokane County
may wtthdraw any declaration of nonslgnlficance that !t mtght issue in rellanre upon this
checklista
Date 11 / 15 / 77 Proponent
(Please Print or Type)
Proponent James S BlaCk
Address 500 Columbia Buidling, Spokane, Washinqton 99204
Phone 509-838-2511
Person completing form James S. Black
Phone 509-838-2511
Da te
Dapt, or Office of County Reviewing Checklist
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist
l 17 JT T
-
- 7
~
= r~ AIR POLlUTION COIdTROI AUTHORITY
POKANE
~ - _N..'--?
OUNTY February 1. 1978
V
Mr. John Sweltzer
Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 Jefferson Street
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear John•
Thi s 1 etter i sin reference to the proposed Red Lion Motor Inn
expansion at Sullivan Road and I-90. We would appreciate the
following information:
1). How large an expansion will this be in terms of generating
additional traffic volume?
2). What specific plans are there to correct the on-site sewage
disposal system (See Environmental Checklist Par I 6.)?
Odors have been a problem with the present treatment facility.
erely,
r ~
Dougl as K. Pottratz, Ai r Qual i ty Engineer
Spokane County Air Pollution
Control Authori ty
DKP ljj
cc • Spokane Co unty Heal th Di stri ct
R ECE IV E
FEa 3 1978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ADDRESS REPLY TO SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY
NORTH 811 JEFFERSON SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99201
r
o~a,~E CpGy~
y rI~ ` SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter-Office Communi cation
4~1H o`S1
Ddte: ,Tanuary 17, 1978
T0: Mr. John Sweitzer, Plannine De v
FROM• Eueene C. Prather
SUBJECT: Sewage facilities - Red Lion Motor Inn
This conf irms our phone conversation of January 9, 1978, concerning adequacy of
the existing sewage system at the Red Lion to accomodate air expansion of about
SO more rooms. In the absence of a licensed professional engineer's report con-
cerning current and projected total liquid waste flows and the capabilities of
tfie existing sewage system, we cannot make a definitive comment. However, it is
our belief that the existing sewage system will require modification to handle
the proposed expansion of the motel.
R E C E I V E
J AN 1 91978
SPOKANE C0U TMENT
PLANNING DEPAR
SCHD-ADM-118
MarCh 15, 1978
Arland Andersen
,q427 N.E. Flalsey
Portlarad, Oregvn W211,
1Re: CondYtion a~ ~E-i'9-68
Agricultural to rreeway Commercial
I?ear Mr. Anclersen;
OuF affiCe hay recea~~od two ptot plans for the proposed Red Lion expansion,
prepared by the architecLural firl~ ~~lph C. Bonadurer and Associatesa
Unfortunately the slilamitteO plot plans dia not meet the cDinimum recruirements
~a ~ a roquired Develop►rent anc~ ~~affic Control P1an.
Section 4. {`1;JA . P4~', of the ~~okane County Zoni.ng OrdinanCe lists the required
elements vf a lDevelopment and Traffic Control Plan as iollows:
auch devetopment and trafftc Contral plan shall show the use, location and
extent of proposed:
1. Biafldfngs and othex improvements fnCl-uding sign str'l,Cture:.
1. Off-street parksng and, loao'ing snaCes.
~ Access and egress driveway locatfoi'r,
4. Street ded+_cation and/ar widening, If any.
S. Screening arEas as descrlbed in Sc-ca ion 4. 0~A. t~GO
o . Such other iniorr~~abon a s may be ~equired by the P annYng Co zaMe. ss i,an
or the Board of Codnty Co-titmissxoners.
Conditiom No. I for ZE-49--68 requires that:
9NThe applicant shall submit copies of a revised Developrnent and TraEL41c
Control PIan to xnclatde the pr+aposed expancjion, existing uses, parking,
sign struCtures ancl sCreening, (1andsCape) to the Spoicane County Zonxng
Adsni~ts-tratox prior to final approv►al of " .E-188-??, "
. ~
Pa+ge 2
Arland AMdersen
ADevelapmeret and Traffic Gomtrol Plan shall a1so list a1l rerluired conditions of the
Zone RQiciBsSifiCi1~tL0n anl:k ~nc~~~7e a naine blorik,r
Hapefolly you wiII be able to goti ac'tion on th~~ ~i':at~er.
Sincerely,
John T. Svveitzer
Zoning Adtrinlstrator
TTS/rIj
o~a~E CpGy~
y~.r ` SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter-Offi ce Communi cation
4~1y 0\S1
Date. January 25, 1978
T0: Spokane County Planning Commission - John Switzer and Tom Mosher
FROM. Dennis Rroll !>Q
SUBJECT: Red Lion - North 1104 Sullivan Road (82 Unit Addition).
Some of the statements and notations made on the Environmental Checklist submitted
for subject proposal may be inaccurate or require further explanation. Specifi-
cally, item 9, page 2 and item 3, page 3, indicate that a septic tank permit
would be needed from the countq. We aren't sure of the septic tank designation as
to whether the sponsor is confusing such with the existing treatment plant or he
in fact, intends to use a septic tank for the disposal of wastewater discharges
for the 82 guest rooms.
Secondly, items 3(g and H), page 3-"Water" should have been given at least a
"maybe" designation since the reason that any of the groundwater aquifer studies
have been occurring is due to the probability that surface waters eventually re-
charge the aquifer, thus the question as to whether such is significantly affecting
the quality and quantity of said aquifer or groundwater zone.
Thirdly, sponsor indicated on page 6, item 16, under "Utilities" that the 82 unit
project would not result in a need for "new systems" or alterations to water,
sewer, storm, water and solid waste. There is considerably more involvement other
than simply "hooking up" the utilities as mentioned by the sponsor.
Lastly, within the sir quality category of the checklist, the sponsor may not be
aware that the additional vehicular activity will at least add to the air emissions.
Until recently, the Spokane County Air Pollution Authority has had several com-
plaints and subsequently, followed-up with compliance requirements on the odor
problems associated with the existing wastewater treatment facility. If the
sponsor intends to use the same wastewater treatment facility without modifica-
tion the acl.or problem may again reoccur.
R E C E I V E
JAN 31 197c}
SPOKANE COUiV7Y
PLANNING DEPARTMEN7
SCHD-ADM-118 •
L !
I \ ' , ~ ` ♦
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2274
SPOKANE WASHtNGTON 99201
M '
SPOKANE COUNTY CoURr tioUsI: M E M O RA N D U M
~ P61.. ~U I
T O • 5^ I D VL/ a (.A7l7(>; C7l~V/~ ~t''~~~ SYUC~l~r4R7c ~ Wfi- g'4?20k
rah D Sw5 ~ A OC
grw , ;U v~t u S 1) S Ar,~J ; S ffW, ; RO; Fc ,4 &fT'-
F R O M: Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 jefferson
Spokane, WA 99201
509-456-2274
Attentfon: ~n"
RE FE RE N C E: Lead Agency Desxgnatfon, Proposed Declaration of Non-
sfgnfficance, Envfironmental Checklf.st, etc.
Pursuant to WAC 197-10- 20 3(3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a
divxsfon of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING
AGEN'CY, rs the LEAD AGENCY for the following project:
~ze:__ /W --7 117
The following is explanation for this determXnation:
Information on file concernfng this proposed action indicates your agency to be
an AGENCY OF JURISDICIION, WAC 197-10-040 (4).
Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro-
vfded in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advised that the proposal was lf sted
in the SEPA Public Informati.on Center on:
a ~
-
A ' , v l I~\ a '
DEPT. FILE REF.~'-
I~I~I~ v••
~ r
• r , ...-J ■ i w .r , d+~
SPGhaN` `°U TY `OJk "°JSE: STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
I. In accordancP wlth the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10,
an Environmental Checklist has b@en submitted by the applicant or his agent.
This checkllst and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed
by th e ~ ~ .
~
I
The fo11ow1ng data briefly describes the proposal:
A. Action Requested:
B. Description of Proposal•
0
C. Location of Proposal: SF '
II. Review of C,zecklis t
A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions:
9~ 4 I~ ( ~g ) w 4 %~D e ( lv )/v o / G.s_ L/7 1 4 L=
JAJ~1 US~ ~ 1 :~9) 77A)9-AAS )e/l'~t C 4I_) P11 t3Lie-
(Over)
B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following
questions•
C. Discussionof impacts identified above•
. ,
-
a ` 'JU
III. Conclusions and Recommendations-
Based on II A, B and C above, the staff
'
,
~ ~
~
~
I
+ ~ .I
. a J
1
v
a
$POn4nC COUMTV GOUkT ti0U3E
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Introduction• The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW,
requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values
both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires
that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly
(and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting [he quality of the environment. The
purpose of thfs checklist is to help the agencies involved deterrnine whether or not a
proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information
presently available to you. Please answ@r questions as "yes" or "mtlybe" if, in your
opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be
aware of and concern themselves with the deqree of impact, asking you for more informa-
tion, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you
believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your
explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should
include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are
relevant to the answars you provfde. Complete answers to these questions now wzll
help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental
review without unnecessary delay.
The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which
you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers
should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed,
even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future, This will allow all
of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental reviev, now,
without duplicating paperwork in the future ,
No applfcation shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returneci
to the appropriate County department, State law requires explanations for everv "yes"
and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing rhe form may be required
to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information
to aid in a threshold determination.
NOTE. This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the Srate
of WashingCon for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not
apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and
continue on to the next question.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I, BACKGROUND
1. Name of Proponent• James S Bl ack
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent
500 Columbia Building, Spokane, Washington 99204
838-2511
3. D3te Checklist Submitted• November 15, 1977
4. Agency Requiring Checklist• Spokane County, Wa #
5, Name of Proposal, if Applicable.
Expansion of motel
(IF SPACE FOR E?CPLANATION IS INADDQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size,
general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate under-
s tand ing of L t s s cope and na ture)
Proposal would allow expansion of the Red Lion Motor Inn and
correction of an on-site sewage disposal problem Proposal wou1d affect
approximately 3.6 acres of ground. Expension would be deslqned along
the same lines as the existinq motel
7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal, as well as the
extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other
information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting
of the proposal)
Proposal is adjacent and east of the existing Red Lion Motor Inn at
the southeast corner of the I-90 freeway and Sullivan Road It is
located on vacant rocky ground which is_not well suited for aQriculture
8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Froposal.
October 30, 1978
9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal
(federal, state and local - including rezones)
Rezone to commercial or freeway commercial-County
Septic tank permit-County
Building permit-County .
108. Do You, or the owner f n the event you do not own the sub j ect land, have any
plans for future additions, expanslon, or fucther activity related to or con-
nected wlth this proposal If yes, explain
Yes, according to the attached plot plan
lOb, Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's
location'? If yes, explaLn
No
11, Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the
property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby) If yes, explatn
Yes A regional shopping center is planned on adjacent acreage.
12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal,
if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date,
describe the nature of such application form
None except those listed in item 9 above.
II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required)
Yes Maybe No
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in
(a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic X
structures ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _
(b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering X
of the soil? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !
~
. _2_
. ~
,
~
a
/
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Ye s M aybe No
(c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? x ~
(d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique X
geologic or physical features ? . . . , , , . ,
(e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either
on or off the site ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~
(f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or
changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may
modify the channel of a nver or stream or the bed of
the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake ? X
Explanatfon Soi1 woul d be disruoted for grading and fnntlngs _
Basements are nnt invnlvPCl_ Sni1 nr Part_h imnart will hP minimal_
2. Air. Will the proposal result in
(a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality?. J j'S
(b) The creation of objectionable odors ? . . , , . , , . , 1'C AZ JTS
(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature,
or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? X
Explana tion 6C1_fAAT10rJ OG AbofftOriaV UC W,fGULAA- QS E__,
3. Water. Will the proposal result in Yes Maybe No
(a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements, in either marine or fresh waters ? __x ^
(b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or X
the rate and amount of surface water runoff
(c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters ?
(d) Change in the amount ot surface water in any water
body ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ~
(e) D:schargA into surface waters, or in any alteration
of surface water quality, includfng but not limired
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? 4-
(f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground Y 3,T 5
wa ters ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through
direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception
of an aquifer by cuts or excavations ?
(h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through
direct injection, o► through the seepage of leachate,
phospates, detergents, waterborne vfrus or bacterfa,
,-T-3
or other substances into the ground waters? -1,
(i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available
for public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . X_
Explanation 4Jaste watP~^ frpp~],av_alnrTAC _
Sp o_i_taq ks an rl r1 ra 3n f i eld ._..d-r-e.a-wi?-~l biQ -
faci1 i tated by drv wel 1 s NoTFr I~E=#A Qisr q4s ZnUcnrEn TNA-r A
T1Zrg.T"tr-^rTJ7i.jWi !'1A7 6C 4~ ia Pr,
-3 -
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUAT4 PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES, )
Yes Mavbe No
4, Flora. Wi11 the proposal result in
(a) Change in the diversity of specie s, or numbers of
any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, microflora and aquatic plants) ? , , , , , . , X ~
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or
endangered species of flora ? , . . . , . , , , , , X
(c) Introductfon of new species of flora into an area,
or in a barrier to the normal replenfshment of X
existing species ? , , , . . . . , , o , , , , , , _
(d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop ? X
Explanation
Yes Mavbe No
5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in
(a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of
any species of fauna (birds, land animals including
reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
insects or microfauna) ? . . , . . . . . . . . . , x-
(b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or X
endangered species of fauna ? . . . . , , , . , , ~
(c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an are3, or
result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna ~
(d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? -X-
Explans tion
Yes M3ybe No
6. Noise. Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? X _
Exp}anation None, other than parki ng 1 ot traffi c
Yes Maybe No
7. Liqht and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare ? A ~
Explanation Car head liqhts will be buffered from residential area bv the
building Any signs erected wi11 face commercial areas onlv Parkinq lat
1ights wi 11 be 1 ow ql are and not directed across anv DrQpertvlines _ b=ct
wi 11 be minimal
1'es Maybe No
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in the alteration of the
present or planned land use of an area X ~
Explanation It will alter the use from aqricultural to commercial. The land
has no aqricultural value and is not beinq farmed.
_4_
~
,
.
x
~
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Maybe 1Vo
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in
(a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? x
(b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource ? X
Explana tion
Ye s M aybe N:)
10, Risk of Upset, Does the proposal involve a risk of an
explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including,
but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) X
in the event of an accident or upset conditions
Explana tion
Yes Maybe No
11 . Population. Will the proposal alter the loca tion ,
distribution, density, or growth rate oi the human
population of an area ? , , , , , , , , . , , , , X
Explanation
12. HousinQ , Wtll the proposal affect existing housing, or X
create a demand for additional housinq ? , , , , . , , , ,
Explanation
Yes tvSaybe No
13. Transportation/Clrculation, Will the proposal result in
(a) Generation of additional vehiculcr movement? . . . , , X
(b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for
new parking ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . , , , , ~
(d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or
movement of people and/or goods ? x ,
(e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ~
(f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles,
bicyclists or pedestrians? . , , . . . . , , , , . , X
Explanation Any additional vehicular movement or alterations in traffic
patterns would be to or from the street and parkinglot. On-site parking
would handle the additional parking denand. Impact to circulation Wi11 be
minimal
-5-
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.)
Yes Maybe No
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered governmental services
in any of the following areas ?
(a) Fire protection? . , , . , , . , . . , . , , . . X _
(b) Police protection ? , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
(c) S chool s ? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X
(d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . , , , X
(e) Maintenance of public facilfties, including roads ? X
(f) Other governmental services ? . . . . , , , , , , , X _
£xolanation The proposal would require the normal government services
provided to the area onl.y
Yes Maybe No
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in
(a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? X _
(b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require
the devElopment of new sources of energy -X- _
Explanation The proposal would require normal amount of energy for heat,
liqhts and air conditioninq onl.y
Yes Maybe No
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new
systems, or alterations to the following utilities
(a) Power or natural gas ? , . . . . . . . . . . , x X :r35
(b) Communication systems? . . , , . . , , , , , , , X-
(c) Water? ~ X
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,
(d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . , . . , . . . , , . . , X-
(e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . , , , , ~ X
(f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . , . , . , .
Explanation None, other than hookup$ of utilities
VJ itAL 2 zZg~yirzt AV~.v r C ~+EC KILr~ UTiL 1 71 gt
Yes Maybe No
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of
any heallh hazard or potential health tazard (excludfng
mental health) , , , . . . . , . . . . . . . ~
Explanation
~ -fi -
-
' ~t ~ ,
~ f
T
I
~r
(IF °PACE FOR DCPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, P-EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES,)
Yes Maybe No
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of
any scena,c vista or view open to the pablzc, or will the pro-
posal result in the creation o£ an aesthetically offensive site
open to public view? . . , . , ,
Explana tion
Yes Maybe No
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the
quality or quantity of existing recreational apportunities? X
Explanation
Yes Maybe No
20. Archeological/Historical. WL11 the proposa] result in an
alteration of a siqnificant archeologic«1 or histoncal site,
structure, object or building ? x-
Explanation
III. SIGNATURE
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are
made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be
any willful misrepresentation or willful lack o f full disclosure on my part, Spokane County
may wtthdraw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue Ln reliance upon this
checkliste
Date 11 / 15 / 77 Proponent
(Please Print or Type)
Proponent James S Black
Address 500 Columbia Buidlinq, Spokane, Washinqton 99204
Phone 509-838-2511 _
Person completing form James S. B1 dCk
Phone 509-838-2511
Date
Dapt, or Office of County Reviewing Checklist
Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist
tI7J1T
-
-7
w` <
r .11f\
SIAT E UC pEPARTMENT O[= TRANSPOKTAI'ION
WASt-iING CQN
01t10e of l lia1nt.i L11UinLLr
~
,e DiXy Lee FZay North 2711 M3yiaur $Iio-ct
Governo► li.,s. 5299 Mirih Cenii ii Siernun
Spokam W ishinytun 99205
January 9, 1978
Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Director
Spokane County Planning Commission
North 811 Jefferson Street
Spokane, Washington 99201
Spokane County Planning Commission
Agenda - January, 1978
Dear Sir:
This office is in receipt of the agenda of your January 13, 1978 Plan-
ning Commission meeting and would comment on the following items:
ZE-112-76
This office would not oppose the rezoning but would point out the existing
state rules and regulations controlling outdoor advertising must be com-
plied with inasmuch as this parcel is among the Interstate System.
AE-188-77
This office would not oppose the rezoning but would point out the existing
state rules and regulations controlling outdoor advertising must be com-
plied with along the subject property.
ZW-140-77
This off ice would request that the approach to the subject property be
restricted to one location and that such approach must be applied for from
tha.s Department.
ZW-108A-77
This office has previously transmitted its recommendation by letter of
November 16, 1977, regarding this reconsideration.
,
Ver truly yours,
~u
. RNING, P.E. ,
District Engineer EC E-IVE
WRH:ib
RRE
cc: EFerguson JAN 12 1978
RREarnes t
SPOKANE COUN3' Y
P1~NN1NG DEPA 'RT 'A ENT
l~
f*ew 51)0KANE VALLEq FIRE DEPARTIAENT
~
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
!~ll~ eA~(
January 4, 1978
,
f
e Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director
Spokane County Planning Commission
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
~
The following reliminary~~ubd~visions and zone classification for upgrading has been,tey'ieweo fo►" flire protection.
,
ZE-188-77 Agricultu~r,al~'to Com~nercial or Freeway Commercial
Bl ack
Mains an`d ,Wydrants n`eed to be instal 1 ed i n thi s area
`
ZW-108A-77 Agricul tuyal"to P,"sway ~ ,
Cox 'Commercial
'
. r ,
Mai,ns and 'hydrNAn ~d to be ~,r~stal,l ed in this area
, f
r r
'1
~ ly ,'~rs*.*~ , x / ~ , s x i + a a S ~ ~ a ~
N
m f
rr ~ x ~
1~ ~ ~Aa~
C~0
as'~'t~nI ~ { I `f i a r 0
,
Lt. of I nsliectors ``~~"i ~ ` ii' I '
J411 r~~ ~ ~
:n' '19 0A
r l
~
r y~i,,~,~~ ~ ti • ~~s 4:x
~~,~I`~~~~r~ ~
/14~ ~'p' ~ttA 4
Sn d~
T y~ r y f fia ~ 4~ Y
~ ~ rt ti 4 k ' ~ A41
c M ~y ~ i
RE C-E [VE D ~JAN 51978
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PRE VENT FIRES SAVE LI VES
E3` t ° ~1
c~
t
y Ol
w'w r,o„~,,,
If~l"~ err Ilrl~ ^ ~ t ''w^,+
t
~ ~ ! ~ _ _ _ _ _ ,
, -4y
~ 1 \ s
!'y a~
,e
t ~
i~r RE
~lA~ ~
C1ZE ~RY, LW
G i ~ A VAP A NS1 O N
MQTEL ~
t R ~YIS'TZ ~',R~~L
E jtE~AY CON'NI ~ ,
Mp'rEL S~TE s a~. ~ , ~
f 1
s ,
F _ a
y,
t
,
S S
i
1 ti , 1 ~ °
tN
b A
ot S ' , t•,~~
0/1
y ,y`~''a~ ~n•~ ~ ' ~ ~ y ` ~ _ ° ~ • t
► r ,,y~ , ~
~ 1 ~
• ,
. ~
j~'~''~ iS
~~T
1 K~~
`I~ - ~ H 1
, R~
~ tw1 ~ j ~ /
,
t~ c w r~~ ~ ~ r
t ~
s a ; ~ ~j ~ I~~ ~ ~ t • ~ IL " t~ ~ ' ~ 1 ~I / ~
_ ~rj~ ~ ~ ° ~r
~ ~ ` ~ 1 ' ~ 1 1 +
1
- ~
At said time and place an„ _nterested person may appear f, or against, the granting
of this application.
AGIIJDA, JANiJARY 13, 1978 TELEPHONE No.: 456-2274
SPOKANE COIINTY PLANNING CQNiNIISSION
Tlme: Friday, January 13, 1978 8:30 A.M.
Place: Conference Room A, Court House Annex
(IIse Mallon Avenue entrance)
ZaNE RECLA.SSIFICATION ~ ~Y - - -
3. ZE-188-77, ARricultural to Commercial or Freeway Coannaercial
a. Location: Sectz.on 13, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M.
Begz.nni.ng at the NW corner of the SW 34 of the
NW 14; th. 1V $9a. 25' 13" E, 544.30 feet along the N line of said subdivision
to the true point of beginning; th. continuing along sa.id 11.ne, North 890
25'13" East, 240 ft; th. $ 00057'43" E, 655000 ft; th. S 89,*25'13" West,
240 ft; th N 00057'43" W. 655.00 ft to the true pt. of beginni.ng.
b. Applicant: James S. Black
500 Columbia Building
Spokane, WA
c. Site Size: 3.6 Acres
d. Exi.sting Zoning: Agricultural
e. Proposed Zoning: Commercial or Freeway Commercial
f. Proposed Use of Property: Expansion of Motel
g. Application of Zon.ing Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040
h. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or 40t this proposal will have a
sigru.ficant adverse environmental impact.
~
. eR.d so VL
■ _ ~~~ti`~~ . ~ ~ ~ `
1
g ~ s~ay '9~
aR1DG
N• 4'`
~ 8 ROA D wAY Av E ,
jiM
13
• Fire
Y
o • S ~,.a, • Station , c
st h00 ~ ~ u
t
~
• ..~~C~ 1'10> a~
- $ C ~04 I
r p
,
,
r-
, VA LLEYWAY
~ 'V A. L ti. E
~
~ ~ -
~ r
ZE-188-77
:
A'hean.ng to cons ider the Zoning Map from Agricultural to Commercial or Freeway Co mmercial
on property described as that portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest q,uarter of
Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W. M., in Spokane County, Wash. described
as follows: Beginning at the NW corner of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4, th. N 89° 25'13" E,
544.30 feet along the N line of said subdivision to the true point of beginning, th continuing
along said line, North 890 25'13" East, 240 ft, th. S 00057143" E, 655 00 ft, th S
89025'13" West, 240 ft, th N 00057'43" W 655 00 ft to the true pt. of beginning.
(Approxlmately 550 ft. East of Sullivan road and South of Highway #2 at the Sullivan
Interchange).
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF WASHINGTOIV )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
4'r being first duly sworn on oath, deposes
and says:
That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and ai-esident of the State
of Wa shington over the age of 18 years.
That on the I0 day of 'H /0 , 19 7c' , I personally
posted one (1) or more true and correct coptes of the hereto attached and tncorporated
herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLiC HEARING in a conspicuous manner at each of
the following locatlons, to-wlt:
U ~ U
Z • ~ G O!M t 4.1_ CAO Wr~R-CX~~e4/ r o7 C.t9-► ~ ~f~0 IIP - ~ ~ ►
V d
,rU
~j
DATED THIS / d DAYOF 19~~•
~
~
S lg ned-tn;:~5 A
c
Subscrlbed and Sworn to before me thts day of .19
Notary Public In and for the State
of V1'ashington, residang at Spokane, WA
q -
SrOKANE COUNTY PLj1NNING COI`-iTMISSION
Court House, O'pokane 1, Vvashington
APPLICATIOTJ FQR LOCAL SUSINESS OR COIViiJ(ERCIAI, ZONE
PART I; Information to be furnished the Planning Commission -vvith an application for
a Zone Change to Local Business or Commercial.
1. Developrnent Plan - a scale drawing of applicant's property and
surrounding streets showing
a. Slze, number, and type of proposed establishm,ents,
b. Off-street parking and loading areas proposed,
c. Proposed acce s s and egre s s points (curb cuts), and
d. Landscaping, screening, or fencing proposed.
2. Econornic analysis indicating the need for the proposed development
` which is to include.
~
.
a. Type and size (square feet of sales space) of eacn establishmPnt to
be built within the area proposed to be zoned,
b. Iv'umber of spaces of otf-street parking proposed,
c. Estirnate of annual sales needed to support each establishment,
d. Location of and distance from nearest competitive facilities,
e. Estimated market area of establishments within area proposed to be
zoned (indicate on a map showing the vlcinity of proposed zone
change), and
f. If estimated market area includes competitive facilit:es, indicate
percentage of sales expected to be received by proposed fac>>ities.
3. Furnish a Ietter from a Tltle Insurance Company, showing the property
owners of record, thezr address, within <<00 feet of the exterior
~
boundaries of subject property.
PART II
Date, 1\JnvPmhPr 9 1977 Applicatzcn No. • ZE-188-77
iVame of Applicant. Tames S. Black
Street Address. 500 Columbia Buildina Clty: Spokane State: Washington
Telephone Number, 838-2511
Existing Zone Classification, Aqricultural
Dote Existing Zone Classification Established. Marclz 27, 1942
Proposed Zone Classification. Commercial or Freeway Commerclal
Proposed Use of Propertyo Expansa.on of Motel r1o. of Acres 3 6
Legal Descrlption ot Proportp;
Sectlon 13 Township 25N Range 44 E W. M
Street Addre s s of Property: vVho Holds Title to the Proi~-ert
Y ~
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, wnat is your
interest in it'~
j;~
~ ° ` ~ i ♦
J~%
A SYETC H OF T~IE AREA PROPOSED FOR t~ ZONE RECLASSIFICATION N1US ~ BE
ATTACHED VvITH THIS APPLICA'rIOiv. THE SKETCH NtUST BE ON A SCALE OF 1" -~=UO'.
lvIaps may be secured from the County Engineer` s Office, Court House,
ALL OF THE FOLLOVvIIVG CUESTIOi1S MUST 331E ANS OERED.
1, What are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional
zoning
.
J ~
•
~
~4A...t at'pe
2. V'vhat facts justify ttie proposed 7one reclassification based on the advancement
of tne public health, safety, and general welfare ?
It
1/7
a
3, -vvhat effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on tne value and
character of adjacent property r
. ~ .
~ y
/ - i
~
!
4
,
r y
r~. Can a reasonable return from or reasonable use of the property in question be
secured under the existing zone classification?
- i ic✓'~~~~ I c. ~ ~ ,
a
iy ♦ ~ l b ~/1 /i-~~ , F. 9.ri'-is /~;lZ 1' ~ ~ a
~
,
, N.
AiVY APPEAL FR01z/I ACTION OF 1HE COTJNTY pLAiVNING COMMISSIQId MUST BE
PRE~ENTED IIJ ZlvRITING TO 1rIE BOARD OF COUNTY COMrJIISSIONERS VVITHIiv TEN
(10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE PLANIVING COIVINISSION.
(Signed)
,
~ -
DATE: T1Tovember 2 , 19 77
ZE-188-77
Spokane County Plaririing Departrnent
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99201
Gentlemen•
'V~ c u_ie undersfgned praperty otruners, request the Spakane County P'lannfng
~~mmissiarn 1,Ea cansider azoning plan) or (ta consider changing the zantrig r'nap)
f rom
Acrricultural to Commercial or FreewaLv Co mrnercial
on the follawkng described property:
That portion af the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of 5ection 13,~ownship 25 1V ,~ange 44 E.W. M.
IN Spokane Caunty, Washingtvn, described as follows: Beginnxng at the NW corner o~
~~e SW 1/4 0f the 1WW 1/4, th N 89025'13" E, 544.30 ft, along the N line of said subdivision
nUequnn3_ncU th contrnuina alona said la.ne~ IV 891125' 13" E.240 feet,
NAME AUDRE SS L£GAL DESCRIPTIOiN OF-PROFERTY -
thS 00057'43" E 65 !00 ftr th S 89025j13" W, 240 ft; fh N 000 57"43" W 655.00feetto
the true pt, of begi ing.
A
30 4. a
5 i ~
~
6.
7
r ~f
Fi
6
~
80
+
E`
i
9
v ~
I
10* '
~ ~ • ~ t'
{
i
12 s ' 13•
■ y
14
- - ~
iI
{
,
~ . ~ '
s -
~ .
SPGKAN~ COUNTY PLANIVING COMMISSION
Court House, Spokane 1, Washington
APPLICATION F'OR LOCAL BUSINESS OR COM1V[ERCIAL ZONE
PART I; Information to be furnished the Planning Commission with an application for
a Zone Change to Local Busine s s or Commercial.
1. Development Plan - a scale drawing of applicant's property and
surrounding streets shovving,
a. Size, number, and type of proposed establishments,
b. Off-street parking and loading areas proposed,
c. Proposed acce s s and egre s s points (curb cuts); and
d. Landscaping, screening, or fencing proposed.
2. Economic analysis indicating the need for the proposed development
which i s to include :
a. Type and size (square feet of sales space) of each estanlishment to
be built within the area proposed to be zoned;
b. Number of spaces of off-street parking proposed;
c. Estimate of annual sales needed to support each establishment,
d. Location of and distance from nearest competitive facilities,
e. Estimated market area of e stablishments within area proposed to be
zoned (indicate on a map showing the vicinity of proposed zone
change), and
f. If estimated market area includes competitive facilit2es, indicate
percentage of s ale s expected to be received by proposed faczlitie s.
3. Furnish a letter rram a Title Insurance Company, showing the property
owners of record, thezr address, within 400 feet of the exterior
boundanes of subject property.
PART II:
Date; NnvF?mhAr 9 1977 Application No.. ZE-188-77
Nam° of Applicant: Tames S. Black
Street Addxess; 500 Columbia Buildina City. Spokane State: Washington
Telephone Number; 838-2 S11
Existing Zone Classification: Agricultural
Date Existing Zone Classification Fstablished: March 27, 1942
Proposed Zone Classification; Commercial or Freeway Commercial
Proposed Use of Property: Expansion of Motel 1Vo. of Acres 3.6
~
~ w ^
~
S
Legal Descr2ption of ?r.6pert-7; That portion of the Southtivest quarter of the Northwest
quarter of Section 13, Township-25 Nor&, Range 4TIast, 1T101 , in Spokane County,
Washington described as follows Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southwest
q u a r te r o f-Tn e MSrtMwZTc y uMTTer; t'pnc: e North ,2'5' , 13al Earc,,b44.30-Tee z
along the North Line of said subdivision to the true point of beginning, thence
continuing along sa7c-T"`rte, North""8"9$, Z5F". f3`~_asL, 17ZtT"reet, inence -)ou-ch lOua,
5713 43" east, 655.00 feet, thence South 890, 25', 13" UJest, 240 feet, thence North
OM3 57 ,43"F'ie s r ee CCa'tMe'tf"uepbIM o
Section: 13 Township, 2 5N Range : 44 E.W. M.
Street Address of Property: None
'Nho Holds Title to the Property;
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your
intere st in it ?
Hold an option to purchase said property
A SKETCH QF THE AREA PRQPOSED FOR A Z0NE RECLASSIFICATION IvIUST BE
ATTACHED WITH THIS APPLICATION. THE SKETCH MUST BE ON A SCALE OF 1" - 400'.
iVlaps may be secured from the County Engineer's Office, Court House,
ALL OF THE FOLLOVvING OUESTIOiVS MUST BE ANSWERED:
1. What are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional
zoning;
A. Motel needs more room for expansion of rooms and convention facilities
B More land area is needed to correct an on-site sewage disposal problem
2. What facts justify trie proposed zone reclassification based on the advancement
of the public health, safety, and general welfare?
Convention and motel business is a clean and profitable industry for Spokane
The Valley is particularly short of facilities
3. tivhat effect will the proposed zone reclassifzcation have on the value and
character of adjacent property?
Ad.lacent propertv is under option for a regional ShOpping center Character would
be very similar It is doubtful that this proposal would have much effect on value.
4. Can a reasonable return from or reasonabie use of the property in question be
secured under the exzsting zone classification?
No Property is zoned agricultural and is poor quality land It is not being farmed
The property's highest and best use novr would be commercial
' • N
ANY APPEAL FROM ACTION OF THE C4UNTY PLAI~TNING COMMISSION MUST SE
PRESENTED IN VvRITING TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOIVERS V1IITHIN TEIV
(10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARIIVG HELD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
*e*e -
(Signed) -
f
OFFICE OF THE
SI'UKATVE COUNTY PLAN'NINC COMNIISSION
Da te Nove mber 2, 1977
ZE-188 -77
TO Title Company
FROM Spokane County Planning Department
SUBjECT Zone Chanae from Aaricultural to Commercial or FrPewav Comm=ial
Please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record of all property
located within 400 feet and the five nearest property owners of the property
descrfbed below.
Also, please include all mortgage and loan numbers with addresses, when
possible, in order that proper notification may be made. If there are no
more than five owners within the 400 foot boundary, please furnish a list
of the owners and taxpayers of record for the five closes ownerships.
Incomplete or illegible title company lists will not be accepted by this
department. Thank you.
(Property Descr2ption)
That portion of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 131 Township 25N, Range 44
E.W. M., in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows
Beginna.ng at the NW corner of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4, th North 89025'13" E
544.30 feet along the North line of said subdivis-on to the true point of beg,
th continuing along said lzne, North 89025'13" E, 240 ft, th S 00,57'43" E,
655 00 ft, th South 89025'13" W, 240 ft, th North 00057'43" W 655 00 feet to
the true point of beginning.
ja me s S Black
500 Columbia Building
Spokane, V1Tashington
Tel 838-2511
l
~ I►IST OF OUlNERS 11IID PkT.")U(J: t1' 7 NG TnxIM OiJ J'ROPERTY
~
Spokane County Code Number ZE-188-77 _ Owners and Persons within 440 feeto
Application is for a Zone Change from Agricultura] to Commercial or Freewa,/ Commercial
Certification of Tlt1_- T hereby c:rtify that following list of names and
addrelosES consisting of thio and the followit►g pabes has been prepared from the
latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct.
Signed by For ,
(Title Company)
nztc ,
LAST GRl1NTCE Itd CHAIN
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDrZESS ADDITIOPI
LOTS BLK
P
ERS01~1S PAYING TAYE.S (T)
U SEOTION 13., TLQWNSHT ?S~ $Mf,F 4 4
T
~
~ Ed Pietz Etal 13542-9019
Box 3385, Spokane,
! Red Lion Motor Inn Wash. 99220 tPort-jj~ of. SG~ l,[,4 nf
NW 1/4, Beginning I t Point 20' rJ E 30' Eof 6V 1/4 corner thence N
649.32' to true poilnt of beainnina, thence N 655' th.encP F 514.3'
thence S 655' thende Wly to point of begi:~ning, EXCEPT road.
i ,
0 K.M. Holman 13542-9020
1 Holman & Austin E 13305 13th Avenue Portion of SvV 1/4 of NW 1/4
beginning at point 20' N& 30' E fo W 1/4 corner & true point of
0 beginning thence N 649.32' thence E 514.3 thence S 649.32' thence W t(
point of beginning; EXCEPT road.
~
C) Inland Empire Paper 13542-9009
Inland Empire Box 686 Spokane, `
T Paper Companv Wash. 99212 Lots 3& 4 of NW 1/4 EXCEPT
oads.
a l, ~
i
~
;Kebob Inc. 13542-9011
i Holman & Austin E 13305 13th Avenue Portion or SW 1/4 of NW 1/4
DAF, beginning 20' N& 20 E of W 1/4 corn(br of Section thence S 89°
~ 51" E along N line of Broadway Avenue #443 for 540.3' to true point o-
beginning thence N 1305.25' to N line of 1/2 of N 1/2 of Section
T thence S 89° 57" E alonc~ said N line 519.~6' thence S 0° 3 1/2" W
(Ccntinucd on r,ext' page)
~
LI:,T Qk ;Pi:D I'ta, ;OI1S PfoYI.►FG D1 rIl F't;Or'LF-'.L.c
1,<<5L' (-ji7j',1liLL .t1I Ct'A I Ii I ADllI'rION
01, ITLE (0) t,ilD ALDFESS ~ LOTS BLY.
I'A1`iT,G `iraYi,S (,I)
0 1306.12' to v line df said road thence N19° 51" W alona said N line
518.08' to true poir~t of beginning EXCEPT'canal right of way 40' wide
'P across. I
U Robert B. Austin , 13542-9012 .
T Holman & Austin E 13305 13th Avenue Point of S 1/2 of N« 1/4
DAF, beginning 20' q & 20 E of W 1/4 corneJr of Section thence S
0 89° 51" E along N l~ne of Broadway road # 443 for 1058.38' to true
point of beginning ~hence N 0° 13 1/2" E 11306.13 to N line S 1/2
; of N 1/2 of Sectionlthence S 89° 57" E aldpg N line 519.36' thence
S 0° 07" W 1306 99' 'to N line of said road thence N 89° 51" W
p aling IJ line 518.08', to true point of beginning EXCEPT canal riqht
ot way 40` wide across & EXCEPT highway.
T
~
0
I
1 I
0
L
~
0
1
l~
~
.
~
t~ I
i
(Ccntlnucd on neht page)
~
~0~
~
~~0
-
~
~ ~
~
-
~
,7
~ 3,0 30 r~
~c
~
~
~r.:--~...~.►= ~w.... +asn---~-
vwxnw- Mmm._
,
1 d
~ ~ ~ t
~ • 1
~
1
~ r
1
,
tiC _
IqC
1 ' ~ 1
~
..r--
~ ~ Kz 1
d .
~
',~•1~ ,O ~ ri,
, 1
.n ,
,
1 ~
-
' ' ~~O~i~if'~ w •+6. . ~
I,
I '1 •
y
♦
OFFiCE OF THE
SFOKANE COUIVTY PLAIVNING COIVIMISSION
Date November 2, 1977
ZE-188 -77
TO Title Company
FROM Spokane County Planning Department
SUBjECT Zone Chanae from Aaricultural to Commercial or Freewav CommeEc,ia
Please furnish a Iist of the owners and taxpayers of record of aIl property
located within 400 feet and the five nearest property owners of the property
described below.
Also, please include all mortgage and loan numbers with addresses, when
po s sible , in order that proper notification may be made. If there are no
more than five owners within the 400 foot boundary, please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record for the five closes ownerships.
Incomplete or ilaegible title company lists will not be accepted by this
department. Thank you.
(Property Description)
That portion of the S'W 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25N, Range 44
E.W.M , in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows•
Beginning at the NW corner of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4, th North 890 25'13" E
544 30 feet along the North line of said subdivis?on to the true point of beg,
th continuing along said line, North 89025'13" E, 240 ft, th S 00157'43" E,
655.00 ft, th South 89025'13" W, 240 ft, th North 00057'43" W 655 00 feet to
the true point of beginning.
james S. Black
600 Columbia Building
Spokane, Washington
Tel. 838-2511
- ~
~ LIST OF ObJNERS AND PITS , PAYYPIG TAXLS OP1 PROPERTY
Spokane County Code Number: ZE-188-77 _ Owners and Persons within 400 feeto
Application is for a Zone Change from Agricultural to Commercial or Freewa7 Commercial
CertifYCation of Title Cowt~an~: I hereby ccrtify that the f~llowing list of names and
addresses consisting of this and the following pages has been prepared from the
latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correcte
Signed by For ,
(Tltle Company)
DatE COUNT'f PL~ Pd I1ING C~~~'111SSiON
Ol'JNERS tdvilr'lED ~
Gk,4.) -J~ - 7~7
CY
LAST GRANTEE TN CHAIIJ ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T)
v SECTION 13.. `UQWNSHTP 9r~.BANrF dd
T
~
0 Ed Pietz Etal 13542-9019 ~
Box 3385, Spokane,
! Red Lion Motor Inn Wash. 99220 tPartvton of Stiv 1, 4 nf
V '
NW 1/4, Beginning ~t Point 20' N E 30' E':)f W 1/4 corner thence N
C' 649.32' to true po.~nt of beainnina; thence N 655' thence E 514.3'
thence S 655' thende Wly to point of beginning, EXCEPT road.
T ,
0 K.M. Holman 13542-9020
Vl' Holman & Austin E 13305 13th Avenue Lrtion of SW 1/4 of NW 1/4
beginning at point 20' N& 30' E fo W 1/4 corner & true point of
t) beginning thence N 649.32' thence E 514.3 thence S 649.32' thence W to
point of beginning; EXCEPT road.
,
L
--r- ,
~
L~ Inland Empire Paper 13 5 4 29-0 0 9
Inland Empire Box 68, 6 Spokane,
i Paper Company Wash. 99212 Lots 3& 4 of NW 1/4 EXCEPT
oads.
' - -
Kebob Inc. ~ 13542-9011
; Holman & Austin ,1 E 13305 13th Avenue Portion or SW 1/4 of NW 1/4
DAF; beginning 201r N& 20 E of W 1/4 corner of Section thence S 89°
L 51" E along N line of Broadway Avenue #441 for 540.3' to true point of
beginning thence N 1305.25' to N line of 1/2 of N 1/2 of Section
T thence S 89° 57" E along said N line 519.~6' thence S 00 3 1/2" W
(Ccntinucd on next page)
~
r
LTST Ox Ot1NEER5 A1~D I' 1~?~~OIiS PAYIiIG Tit/L'i GI1 P:tO~'F Ft`;' j
LASL GRI',idlLE 71N1 CHAIy ,
01, `LSTLE (0) Au'jD ~ ADDITION
PER SG^15 PA~`ING Tik}'ES (T) ~~~~RESS LOTS BLK
0 1306.12' to N line cf said road thence N~9° 51" W alona said N line
518.08' to true poi t of beginning EXCEPT canal right of way 40' wide
T across.
0 Robert B. Austin 13542-9012
~ .
T Holman & Austin E 13305 13th Avenue Point of S 1/2 of NW 1/4
DAF; beginning 20' I~ & 20 E of W 1/4 corne!r of Section thence S
0 89° 51" E along N li,ne of Broadway road # 443 for 1058.38' to true
point of beginning ~hence N 0° 13 1/2" E 306.13 to N line S 1/2
T of N 1/2 of Sectionlthence S 890 57" E alo~ng N line 519.36' thence
S,011 07" W 1306.99' to N line of said road thence N 89° 51" W
p aling N line 518.08' to true point of begipning EXCEPT canal right
ot way 40' wide across & EXCEPT highway.
T
I
0
1 ,
0
T
0
m
i
0
1
0
I
T
V
L
I
L~ 1
~
(Continucd on next page)
r ~
~
ZOIVE CzIAIVGE PRE-APPLICATION
Z.
Date 7-- 2i - 77 Appllcation No:
Name of Applicant I~ w1F~ S. I~L~
Street Address: 500 (Q'L4w,rva4 Qloc& City: State•
Telephone No: S38 - 25 I I
Existing Zone Classlfication: kc,2t[uLTA4AL...-
Existing Zone Classiftcation Established: 3- 27 - 44 Z
Proposed Zone Classification:-G MMr.. R&LqI r pJZ, rQar:,6L~ (00"MrfijQ0
Proposed Use of Property• -"Stori Q; Ma=c1- No.of Acres 3•~
Legal Description of Property:
Scz: a ATmcwco
~
i
Section: Township: Z 5 Range
Street Acdress of Property:
Who Holds Title to the Property
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is
your interest in it e
_ AL
.
,
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
That portion of the Southwest quarter of the Northwest quarter of
Section 13, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W M, in Spokane County,
UJashington described as follows
Beginning at the Northvrest corner of the Southwest quarter of the
Northwest quarter, thence North 890, 25', 13" East, 544 30 feet
along the North Line of said subdivision to the true point of
beginning, thence continuing along said line, North 890, 25', 13"
East, 240 feet, thence South 000, 57'5 43" East, 655.00 feet, thence
South 890, 25', 13" West, 240 feet, thence North 000, 571, 43" West
655 00 feet to the true point of beginning.
. .w ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~1`~y
_ _ _ . ~ _ ~ ~ .'"r - _ \
~ - ~
~ ~ ~~u• ~
car F .-.I
rw
..y'•'
; ~ -t----`------ f
LU
.
~to ~ . '
' ~ ~ --~t
0 ; Ir' 1
~
~ { ~ 'r~ - ~ 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ •
p ;.1
r,~ SS i
~ l
_L
. . • - - .
• t
t
z,
~
~ ~ • ,
t
1
~
A- ~
~ T • ~ ' '
h
. ~ . • ` ' ' , ~ , ~ r, ~ 4``; fa ` I _ - - ~ . - ~ • ` -
.
_ ~
1
' . 1
SP0KANE
COUN'1" PLAN Nlld(,;O 1411:3:.1')td
Date November 2 1077
ZE-188 -77
TO Title Company
FROM Spokane County I'l.:Inning Department
SUBJECT Lane Chan(e riom Ac ricultural to Commercial or Fr e
om i
Please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers
property of theof all re operty
located within 400 feet and the five nearest
described below.
whe
Also, please include all mortgage and loan
be madeumbers with Ifthereadresses, non
possible, in order that proper notificationmay lease furnish a list
more than five owners within the 400 foot boundary, phips
of the owners and taxpayers of recordfor the sve closes not be acceptedsbyt his
Incomplete or illegible title company lists will
department. Thank you.
(Property Description)
of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 13, Township 25N, Range 44
That portion
E .W . M . , in Spokane County, Washington, described as follows:
Beginning at the NW corner of the SW 1/4 oft V1S W 1/4; th
hetrue Northp89 25'beg;
13" E
.,
544.30 feet along the North line of said ub .�' S 00,57'43" E,
th continuing along said line, North l8ft;? h 13" E, North UO 240
57 ft;
43 W 655.00 feet to
655.00 ft; th South 89° 2 5' 13" W,
the true point of beginning.
James S. Black
600 Columbia Building
Spokane, Washington
Tel: 838-2511
0