ZE-102-77 e w t ~f t
~
°ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
-r
,
OR
a
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
' ACTION TAKEN APPROVE
DENY
CONTINUE
LffiNGTH OF CONTINUANCE
J
REASO NS 1.
2.
3.
4.
CONDTIONS Subject to the Conditions as }a ;nditions tained in the Planninq
Staff's Findings , Dated ~ ' ~ k4t-zllo,
and subject to the additional o1.
2.
, 3. ,
~
VOTE Motion by
Seconded by ~
VOTE % ` 01LAA-11 YES NO
ti
I
SPOKANE COUNTY ° - T
ru~~~ PLAIVNING DEPARTMENT • N 81 'I JEFFERSON
SPOKANA, WABHINGtOAI 99201 sEP -2 77
~
, .,e-~»'~~, i - 131
~ ~
~
/o.~2 - 7 -7
Constance M Hobbs
W 2011 2nd
Spokane, WA 99204
E
~ Ft S _JS EC.
p ~
E►~oEr,
z~ r Tu.to-
~
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT QpK q~~`i,;~,,.~ ~
0 3 S~a~~".
N 9i 1 JEFFeRSON
SPOKAN,I~, WASHINOZOM 99201 $EP-2'77 /t % ~
~ ~
I 3
7 ~ " - 1 L
~ R
trvin R Bri 1 ey
E 11623 Augusta
Spokane, WA 99206
-Lf;AEL= .q° j E~L \
i F rS t IESSEU r~Q-SFP 12 9
0 ~o~tivnRD P ~
I Q77
~ ~
_ t
SPOKANE COUN'TY
PLAIVNING DEPARTMEiVT
IV 811 JEFFERSON ~ 9 v'= JJ,'~~~~
'S
SPOKANE, WASHINOTON 99201 JUL 29' 17
~.;y►~..:,~ ~ i 3
~ 3 a i 57u it_., 1 w
-77 ~ -
~ -
Consta e M: Hobbs
Ws 2011
Spokane, WAa 9204
-~r ..r. •~r~..
~.,0 d'~E S~~F C E , ~NE \
~
~~z~ N C ~J f~ ~'~''N,4 ~
197
r37RET''RN'70 SEljrcR
. -
y1 _ ~
l ~ E .S E~111 A I L c
SPOKANE COUNTY ~~~r
~
I
ul
PLANNiNG DEPARTMEIdT ~ IC' ~ ~Y` h ~
N 81 1.lEFFERSON / ~4l 4~~y -4~8 ,A iH-R I S T~!1 tl J f-
IV
SPOKANP, WASHINC3ZON 99201 ~ i•
1
~llovec~, left no address Ftl ~~3 `atv
E7
RD E CE: I V E C] No c-Ch nuniber
Q Ioove , not forwuftble
Addrc
-ssee unkndwn
NOV 14 1977 , 91
SPOKANE COUNjY :i
pLpNN1NG DEPARTMENT Margorie . Peterson
W. 51 1 st Ave.
Spokane, wA 99204
_.rfljOQL~ T0 FGBWARD 1 `n,~. -P M co
4
TO SENDER Y s~ ~ ti~
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNtNG DEPARTMENT
c.i~,.i • 7 ~ ~
N 811 JE!FFERSON NQV-A'7B
SPOKANg. VIfA8HIN6iOAI 9920I
~ /
~
~ OV 1519~1
POKANE MEN~
ANN~NG ~EPARj Constance M. Hobbs
W. 2011 2nd
Spokane, WA 99204
RE ESSE E
- P M ~
r~.~r. t~ RN T O SENDER ~ ~ t~+ ~ ~ i t ~l,
~ - _ _ - _ - _ _ _ . - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ r
SPOKANE COUNTY
~
~ ~
~
.2.
PLANNIIVG DEPARTMENT ' -K
N 811 JEFFERSON
~U~~'•9 77 I f j~~
SPOKANE WABHIN6TON 99201
13 {
z~ l0D--7-7
Ellen K. Johnson
E. 11620 Mtssion Ave.
Spokaneg WA. 99206
,
a~
A` lL `
S
r ' ~I F0{~~~t~~iG ~ t? M o
~~.TJt T0 SfNOCf~ KL~~
- 1
w/ - ~ - ~ -
} 4
~ .
~
~ . . . . ~
~
4
{
t
~ ~Q! d~ 7N41I1~N
~
. f fr
i
~ J
_ I
^ j~ h
~
1
d
r
~sod~'b►d asa o~
v _od
a
~
~
V ~ S ~ - ~ r ~er~ ti.~ . ' ~ • " _ _ r~ c~~
r k ~ E e.s 'I`' 9
~
P ~
I
a ~
B ~,w
Z
f
r
~
~
~ TOM rMtQutE"A J~~Y 28~ 1991 t
" • 1r'0' ml 5510r1
.
~ ~ .
SE.~ :EF.
1 7
~1 7~~~ ~i►~ ~
,
d
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
;
DECLARATION OF
a
~ (proposed/final)
.r
sPp •wc <ounI wua -ou5r•
(significance/nonsignificance)
1. Description of Proposal C/VC d or COAVT~,#70xJ 7.0-109-7' ~
?eRyw#j , ` T lJam 'j)Vr M u~m&--w-r PAam) r /W
_ ~oar
_-FAo M4 Aj?r 64MAzr;V orly.v,r,s - /d.~I v~v~s
---12AXit~ A4&W 00CZ/Fo #q 39 6~~ -.10 rt-/74
# g~ WS 59 F7-
2 . Proponent QVt1- X)
3. Contact Person Phone
counhrAction(s) Requested .4L ~F if-IJii Qir &Ab/7?D~ ?ro'
4•
~
5. Location of Proposal &TIO&W-Z ?100QAW
~~I '2il-TAM
6. Lead Aqency SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
This proposal has been determined to A2jQ7 have a significant adverse impact on
the environmPnt An EIS is A)4= required under RCW 43 21C.030(2) (c) This
decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmpntal checklist
and othAr informat9un on file with the lead agency
Responsible Official
Proposed DLclaration Final Declaration
(name) (nameuq&&A
.
si nature.~t-~ si ature) `4c
(title (title) %.gnu
de t JV /V /~~p v (de t OT ~O.
~ da e (date) i/4/9Departmc~nt Reference No 78 ~ . ~ "/6~ 7
(See Reverse Side)
~ IL
i '
.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
North 811 jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Honorable Board of County Cominis s ioners
Spokane County Court House
Spokane, Washington 99260
Gentlemen:
At the reqular hearing of the Spokane County Planninq Commission on Friday,
April 21. 1978, at 8:30 A, M e to 12:00 noon, reconvening at I:40 A. M. to
5:20 p. m. in the Health Butidinq Auditocium, Room 140, The Enclosed action
was taken and is recommended to the 8oard of Coutity Commissioners.
Memhers ..ssnt: Mro McCoury, Mrs o Byrne, Mrs a Rawlings, and the Messrs.
Kennedy, MaEn, Qulgiey and Thomas. Planning Staff present; Dayharsh,
Sweftzer, Davis, Deysencoth, Fergen, Wesche and justice. Engineer's Office:
Flnney. Prosecutor' s Office: Emacio 0
Sincerety,
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANN3NG COMMISSION
Ted McCoury, Chatrman
Fred L. Dayharsh, Director of Planntng
FLD:kj
Officlal minutes and record of action
taken by the Spokane County Planntrtg
Cominisston at thetr regular hearin+g
held on April 21, I978 0
1
~
~
v
MINUTES OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING COMMISSION HEARING OF
APRIL 21, 1978.
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commisston dtd hold a publlc
meettng on April 21, 1978 to consider the testimony and requests of several appltcants,
ob jectors and other tnterested partiss concerntnq the below referenced zone
classifications and other items of business, and
WHEREAS, at satd hearing opportuntty was afforded those favortng and
those opposing all items of business, and
WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Mrs. Byrne, Mrs. Rawltngs and the Messrs.
Kennedy, Main and Qutgley.
WHEREAS, the Spokane County Ptanntnq Commtsston fully considered the
testimony gtven the environmental revtew, and aIl other evtdence presented,
recommends to the Board of County Commissfonsrs the following:
1. F ive Miie Proq re s s Report:
Mr. McCouty announced that Mr. Kennedy couldn't participate in the planning
of Five Mile because he hadn't attended ail of the meetings to its consideratione
Mr. McCoury stated that it was necessary to have anothec niotion by Mro Qutgley
for the same request that had been made at the previous hearinq. Mr.
Quigley had made the Ynotion at the March 30th meetinq, seconded by Mrv
Kennedy. Mr. McCoury said that only five Corrimission members had parti-
cipated In the plan.
The original motion stated, "That the Planning Staff be directed to prepare
a final plan for Five Mile based upon the maps and the goals and pollcies
pretty much as developed as per the Cttizens Comrnittee from Ftve Mile and
as per the final vote." Mr. Quigley wished to add the following to his
motion, seconded by Mtso Rawlfnqs: That all of the other materfals in the
alternate plans shouZd be submftted along with the plan recommended by the
Citizens Coramittee. (Only Plan "D" for Five Mtle should be considered to
go through the entire process. The other plans should iust be submitted as
source material o) Messrs o McCoury, Quigley, Thomas and TVtrs a Rawlinqs
voted "Aye" o Mrs. Byrne vetec "No". Messrs. Kennedy and Main abstained
from voting. Motion carried.
2. Planninq Business:
a} Report on Commissioners' Actfons
john Sweitzer of the Staff presented a Planning Staff review of all
items which had been appealed to the Board of Caunty Commissioners -
-I-
ti
ZE-2-78, Tupper request for a zone change from Agricultural to Local
Business o This property is located at the northwest corner of Sullivan
and Boardway. The Planning Commission recommended denial; however,
the Board of County Commissioners reversed the decision and gave their
approval to the zoning request on May 23rd,
ZN-150-77, proposed by Harlan Douglass, at the northwest corner of
Francis and Washingtona This proposal was recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission, and the appeal hearing upheld this decision
and gave their approval to the zonlng request on May 23rd.
ZE-192-77, proposal on North Pines from Local Business to Commercial
by Mc C Properties. Thfs zone change proposal was recommended for
denial by the Planning Cbmmissfon, and a decision has not as yet been
gfven by the Board of County Commissfoners after their appeal hearing.
b) Staff Reports.
Mr. Sweitzer reported that the Staff requested a one month continuance
on showing Resfdential Office Zones which had been approve3 on North
Pfnes for information and evaluation by the Commfssion.
c) Report from Policy Committee.
There had not been a recent meeting of the Policy Committee .
Mrs. Byrne suggested a dfscussion be held on the Pollcy Commfttee
being ad hoc or a teinporary committee and the determination made
whether it is necessary to have as a permanent committee an3 also 3efine
the responsfbilities of the commlttee.
Mro Kennedy asked that the Policy Commi.ttee be continued. He stated
that it should be checked whether or not the member of the Commission
has the capability of voting on an lssue and who 3etermines whether a
person has a conflict of interest. He said this should be decLded by
Commissioa members.
Meo Thomas moved, Mr. Kennedy seconde3 that it be proposed that the
Policy Committee be a permanent committee but not meet on a regular
basis but only at the direction of the Commission.
Mro Emacio, legal counsel, advise3 that it would be necessary to
amend the By-Laws, advertise the amendment proposed, and take action
at the next regular hearing of the CoYnmission. Mro McCoury
suggested that thls matter be postponed until the ftrst meeting in May
for further consideratfon ot the motion. No vote was takeno The
Commisslon concurred with the postponement.
- 2 -
~
.
'
d) Other Business a
ZW-26-78, Citizen Request ot Change Zonfng Map,
Mra Terry M. Thompson requested that the Commfssion place his
proposed zone change from Agricuitural to Restricted Industrfal on
tlze aqenda in May for property located in the area of Russell Road
intersectinq with Highway No a 2. The Site contains approximately
50 acres and it is planned to have an office - tndustrial park, Mra
Thpmpson stated that 30 % of the requfred property owners' sfgnatures
had been obtafned on the petition whtch had been circulation. Mr.
Sweltzer informaed the Comnstsston that the West Suburban Compre-
hensive Plan designates the area on t#ie edge of the subiect property
as Restricted Industrial zoning o
Mr. Quiqley moved, Mra Main seconded, that Mr. Thompson's
request be placed on the Commission's next aqenda. Messrs.
McCovey, Kennedy Quigley, Thomas and Main voted "Aye" v Mrs a
Rawlings voted "No". Mrs o BYrne abstained from voting. Motfion
carrfed.
Mrs. Byrne moved, Mra Kennedy seconded, that a study or referral be
made by the appropriate committee or some action be taken reqardinq
some of the requirements to see If they should not be changed - to
be studied and re-evaluated to see if they are still fillirig the purpose that was
that was fntended for processing applications o Motion carried un3ni-
mous ly.
ZN-161A-72
Mr. Sweitzer reported that the legal description was Incorrect on the
advertised agenda; the Planning Commission approved one piece of
property and the Board approved another.
Mro Maln moved, Mr. Thomas seconded, that ZN-161A-72 be placed on
the next agenda for tfie Commission to consi,der. Mation carried
unanimouslyo
e) Ordinance Amendrnents:
Vttai Records Center as a Conditional Use in the Aariculturai Zone.
In order that the language be consistent, 4.04.170 (ii) and 4.24.550,
should be "Vital Records Center" instead of "Vftal Statistics Center"
in the proposed amendments.
-3-
.
N.
Mr. Quigley mov ed to approve the proposed amendment allowinq a
Vftal Records Center as a Conditional Use in the Agricultural Zone.
Mr. Thomas moved, Mrs. Byrne moved to amend the motion to
amend Paragraph 3-B to read a fifty foot (50) front yard setback instead
of the 25 feet listed in the standards. Motion carri.ed unanimously.
Mrso Byrne moved, Mra Quigley seconded, to amend the Zoning
Ordlnance to allow a Vltal Records Center as a Condltional Use Permit
in the Agricultural Zone, fncludf ng the Declaratfon of Non-5 ignificance
for the envi.ronmental assessment by the Staff, wfth the change of
fifty (50) feet. Motion carrfed unanimously.
Proposed Deletion of Section 4.06.040 from the ZoninQ Ordinance
Regardinq Uses Prohibited - Beautv Pariors in the Two-Familv Zone.
Mr. Sweltzer stated that the Staff has received three letters requesting
deletion of this use as a home occupation. It is necessary to 3etermfne
whether the beauty parlor is a primary use or a home occupation o
Mr. Qufgley moved that the proposed amendment be denied.
Mrs. Mary Mitchel], East 12819 Semro, spoke In opposition to the
proposed amend.•nent. She cited the work done in 1963 through 1965
to obtain the status the way ft exists. Mro and Mrs. Munyan have
made the request for the deletion.
Mike Senske reported that duplexes are being used for residential pur-
poses only and not for commerctal uses. He stated that the State of
Washf ngton ts planning to drop all licensing features for beauty parlors
tn the near future .
Mr. Quigley moved, Mr. Mat n seconded that the proposat to drop
the beauty parlor provision be denieda
Mrsa Rawlings moved, Mrs v Byrne seconded, that the motion be
amended that the other residential zoned be reviewed for appropriateness
of home occupations. Motion carried unanimously as amended o
Proposed Conditional Use within Residenttal Office Zone - Residential ,
Off'ice Accessorv Uses
Mr. Sweltzer explafned that the primary use is offfce, and the proposed
amendment would consider allowing pharmacies, coffee shops,
cafeterias, and answerrng services as an accessory use through the
Conditional Use Permit procedure within the Residential Office Zonea
It would be anticipated that the accessory use would occupy no more
than 10 % of floor area in the Residential Offfce Zone a
-4-
J•
~
Mr. Main asked questions regarding the space devoted to thls use
and also the provision for signing. Mr. Quigley asked that this
proposed amendnent be considered at a Iater time and have the Staff
prepare altertiatives for revtew by the Commission. Mrs. Byrne
suggested that a definttion of accessory uses amendment be returned to
the Staff for futher clarification and placed on a future agenda. MatLon
carried unaniaiously.
3. ZE-5-78, TRANSIENT LIVING TO COMMERC?AL: PEARSON, BOYD & LITTLER
That the zone reclassification request (File Number ZE-5-78) be approved,
and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planninq Comiaission's
Flndings of Fact as well as the conditions stated in the Staff's Findings, and
wfth the added condition that the zone chanqe be developed Ln substanttal
confornlancd with Plot Plan "D" dated April 13, 1978 and that the application
is to conforia to the requlrenients of the District Fire Chlef, and that a
proposed declaration of Non-Significance be issued. (Mrs. Rawlings rnwed
Mr. Thomas seconded. Vote was unanimous a)
4. ZE-1-78, AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED TNDUSTRIAL: MILLER & BRAINARD CONST.
That the zone reclas siftcation reque st (Ftle Number ZW-1-78) be continued
for one itonth to allaw the developer and Staff to andswer some voncerns such
as: The Health District requirements; screening of the NW corner of the develop-
ment; provlsion for water storage for fire protection; and also an eavironmental
review should be prepared. (Mr. Thomas moved, seconded by Mr. Quigley.
Vote was unanimous. )
51 ZE-4-78, AGRICULTURAL TO MUL'II PLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: MC QUEEN.
That the zone reclassification request (Ftle Number ZE-4-78) be approved,
and in so approvinq, adopts the Staff's findings as the Planninq Commission's
Findtngs of Fact as wel.l as the condltfons stated tn the Staff's findinqs, an3
t hat a proposed declaration of Non-Siqnlficaace be issuedo (Mrs. Byrne
moved, Mr o Quigiey seconded o Vote was unanimous a)
. ZE-102A-77, AGRICULTURAL T4 MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: MC QUEEN.
That the chanqe in condition of the zone reclassfficatton request (ZIE-102A- 77)
be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's findiags as the P1anning
Comrntssion's Findiags of fact as well as the issuance of a declaration of
Non-Significance o(Mro Thomas moved, Mro Kennedy secondede Vote was
unanlmous a )
79 ZS-37-78, AGRICULTURAL T4 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN: SPO. CO. PLAN. COMM.
That the zone reclassification request be approved, and in so approving,
adopts the Staff s Findings as the Planning Commission's findings of Fact as
well as the condlttons stated in the Staff's Findings, and also that a proposed
declaration of Non-Signfficance be tssued. (Motion by Mrs. Rawlings, Mra
Byrne seconded the motion o Vote was 5 yes, 2 no. Motion carried o)
-5-
.
~
8. ZE-38-78, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENT?AL:
SPO. CO, PIAIVNING COMMISSION. That the zone reclassification (File
Number ZE-38-78) be denied. ( Motion by Mr. Quigley, seconded by Mr.
Kennedy. Vote was unanimous.)
91 ZN-39-78, AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRLAL: GRIFFITH. That the
zone reclassification request (File Number ZN-39-78) be dentede (Mro
Kennedy moved, seconded by Mr. Thomas. Vote was unanfmous j
10. ZE-40A-73, AGIUCULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS• SISCO (Continental Ofl)
That the zone reclassificatton r3quest (ZE-40A-73) be approved, and in so
approving, adopts the Staff's Findings as the Planning Commission's ffndings
of Fact as well as the cnnditions stated in the Staff's Ftndings, and also
that a proposed declaration of Non-Signiffcance be issued. (Mro Thomas
moved, seconded by Mro Quigley. Vote was unanimous.)
11. OSE-4-78, OPEN SPACE LAND• CURTIS o That the open space application
(File Number OSE-4- 78) be approved, and in so approving, adopts the Staff's
Findtngs as the Planning Commission's Findings of Fact, and also that a
proposed declaratlon of Non-Significance be issued. Mrs. Rawltngs, moved,
seconded by Mr. Kennedy. Vote was unanimous.)
12 o OSE-5-78, OPEN SPAGE IAND• WORTH. That the open space application
(File Number OSE-5-78) be approved, and In so approving, adopts the Staff's
Findinqs as the Planning Commtsslon's Flndfngs of Fact, and also that a
proposed declaration of Non-Slgntficance be tssuedo (Mra Qufgley moved,
seconded by Mrs o Rawling s. Vote was unanfmous o)
Planning Staff Present: Dayharsh, Sweitzer, Davis, Deysenroth, Fergen, Wesche
and justice. Engineer's Office: Finney. Prosecutor's Office• Emacioa
DATED THIS 27th L1AY OF APRIL, 1978 0
BY: Kathleen justice
Recording Secretary
For• Ted McCoury
P1anning Commission Chacrman
Fred L a Da yha rs h
Director of Planning
!
-6-
FINDINGS Apr11 21, 1978
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION - RECONSIDERATION OF CONDITIONS ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION
ZE-102A-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO 11UL?IPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN. MC QUEEN
A PROPOSED ACTION
Condition No. 6 for ZE-102-77 reads. The advertised propoerty shall be
developed in substantial conformance with the development plan on file _
with this application.
The applicant has requested an amendment of Condition No. 6 to allow for
13,850 square feet of additional property (ZE-4-78), for a larger develop-
ment which will require a revised development plan.
ZE-102-77 was approved allowing for a 14 unit mu]tiple family development.
If ZE-102A-77 and ZE-4-78 are both approved, the applicant would be permitted
a total of twenty-one (21) units
The following are the original Staff Findings for ZE-102-77 - Agricultural to
Multiple Family Suburban
FINDINGS OF ZE-102-77
This request was reviewed by the Planning Commission on September 16, 1977.
The Corrmission concluded that the applicant's development proposal was rather
vague, and that a detailed development plan and an elevation rendering be
reviewed by the Planning Staff and Corrmission before action is taken on the
ione reclassification.
I. SUPIPlARY
The applicant's proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses, is con"
sistent with recent Planning Commission Zone Reclassifications; 1s consistent
with the Regianal Comprehensive Plan, has or can provide adequate provisions
for circulation, sewage disposal, water and fire protection,
II. GENERAL INFORMATION.
A. Existing Land Use - Site three (3) two-famllyresidential units, duplexes
to the north vacant property, T-90 Freeway
to the south single family residential uses, duplexes
to the west Senior Citizen Center, Valley Mission Park
to the southwest apartment units, one four-unit apartment,
a court apartment, and a 16-unit complex
to the east single family residential uses, duplexes.
-4-
ZE-102A-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAt9ILY SUBURBAN (Continued)
B Zoni ng Hi story of Area
Request Date Action Taken
to the north Agricultural 3-24-42 Approved
Two-Family Residential 10-14-76 Approved
to the south Agricultural Suburban 4-12-55 Approved
to the east Agricultural 3-24-42 Approved
to the west Agrlcultural 3-24-42 Approved
to the southwest Multi Family Suburban 2-17-77 Approved
h1ulti Family Suburban 2-13-69 Approved
C. Comprehensive Plan
Proposal is consistent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan
Explanation The Regional Comprehensive Plan indicates the site as
being appropriate for residential uses, the site is located on the
edge of a residential neighborhood, fronts on an arterial and has
access to shopping, community services, public facilities, and an
arterial system.
III SPECIAL INFORMATION
A. Circulation
Frontage Type ADT
Mission Avenue Secondary Arterial 3,740
Engineer's Review• The Spokane County Engineers have requested that
all access from the site be restricted to Bowdish Road and/or Bates Road._
B Sewage Disposal
This project is located in an area with so11s classified by the Soil
Conservation Service as suitable for installation of individual on-site
sewage disposal systems. The area is, however, located over the Spokane
Aquifer. A study is currently under way to determine the degree to
which subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent may pollute the
Aquifer There is very little probability that this project in itself
will have more than a slight impact on the Aquifer. However, taken in
conjunction with the overall urbanization of the area, some other sewage
disposal method will most likely be required in the future.
From an environmental health viewpoint, the project appears feasible
NOTE The applicant's revised development plan shows a primary sewage
treatment facility, septic tank and large drainfield
C Water
Availability through Modern Electric and Water Company
D. Fire Protection
Fire Mains are not available
F7re Hydrants are not available
-4A-
w
ZE-102A-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Continued)
E. Staff Environmental Review
Concluded that a declaration of Non-Significance be issued
IV CONDITIONS
The Planning Department Staff feels the following conditions would be
appropriate, if the proposal is approved
1. Dedication of the east ten (10) feet of the advertised property for
right-of-way purposes
2. Dedication of a twenty (20) foot radius at the southwest corner of the
advertised property (northeast corner of Plission Avenue and Bowdish
Street), and the southeast corner of the advertised property (northwest
corner of Plission and Bates. )
3. Improvement of Mission Avenue along the project perimeter to Spokane
County standards. Improvements shall include curbs, sidewalk, drainage
control and paving to existing pavement.
4. Improvement of Bowdish Street and Bates Street along the project perimeter
to Spokane County Standards Improvements shall include curbs, sidewalk,
drainage control and thTrty (30) feet af pavzng.
5. Access permits for the advertised property shall be obtained from the
Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits
for the project.
* 6 The advertised property shall be developed in substantial conformance
with the development plan on file with this application
7. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
vehicles, shall be maintained in hard surface paving.
8 An on-site, storm drainage system for the project shall be approved by
the Spokane County Engineer's Office
9. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maln-
tenance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be
submitted for the project prior to release of building permits
10. The appiicant sha11 provide a performance bond to cover the cost of
the required landscaping prior to release of building permits.
11. Installation of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the require-
ments of the Spokane Valley Fire Marshal
12. Sewage disposal shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District
13 That the provisions of SEPA'S NOTICE OF ACTION pursuant to 43.21c.080
RCW and the Board of County Commissioners, Resolution No 77-1392 be
accomplished by the project applicant within thirty (30) days of formal
action by the Board of County Commissioners, as instructed by the Planning
' Department Staff.
-4B-
At satd tinne and ptace any Xnterestecl person may appear for, or against, the gcant nc c''
ta ls appllcation
AGENDA, APRII. 21, 1978 TELEPHONE Nr e
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSTON
Time Frtday, April 21, 1978, 9:30 a. tn.
°lace: Spokane Cou nty Health Dlstrtct Audltor!-1-^^,
Room 140, West 1101 College
RECOIVSIDERAI'IOAT OF CONDITION ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION
4. ZE-102A-77* Agricultural to Multlple Famlly Suburban
a. Locatlon: Sectlon 9, Townshlp 25 N., Range 440 E.W M.
The S 125 feet of Lot 57, Pinecroft Ftrs*_ Adti►Pt+c-
b. Appltcant• Tom S. McQueen
East 23219 Main
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
c. Site Stze: Approximately 3/4 acres
d. Exlstinq Zoninq• Agrtcultural, establlshed Aprll 24, 7d Q42
e. Proposed Zonfng• Multiple FamLly Suburban
fa Proposed Action- Condttion No. 6 for ZE-102-77 reads• T1-?
advertised property shall be developed Ln
substantlal conformance wlth the develerame!?t
plan oh ftle wlth thls appllcation.
The appllcant has requested an amendment off
Condition No. 6 to allow for a 13, 850 square
foot expanslon, (Zone Change ZE-4-78), ar-d {^r
a revised development plan.
g. Proposed Uso of Property• Apartment Complex
h. Applicatlon of Zoning Provlslon Chapter 4.21, Sectlon 4.21.040
i. Environmental Impact• A toplc of discusslon at thts hearing may be
whether or not this proposal wlll have a slgnlflcant adverse envtronrrenta ~
, ~ripao a~ria it
J~ ~ , r II Vnr
o~^ - ~ N co wiwr o*
~ J
~ r
0
ep
- ? a a ~ ~t
$ ~
(j g o ~ 1r r.o.~
L s 03 '
, -
o
~s A x w E ~ Y
i~ • 0
M ~El.~. , SINro 1 t O
'
O
A
I eoaN~
JL
4162
~
a .ri r1.."
At sald time and place any interested person may appear for, or agRinst, the granting o¢
$lhis appllcation
AGENDA, APRIL 21, 1978 TELEPH0NE TVO,• 456-2274
SPOKANE COUN2'Y PLANNING COMMISSION
Time• Frlday, April 21, 1978, 9:30 a.rn.
Place. Spokane County Health Distrlct Audito?ium,
Room 140, West 1101 Col!ege
-RECONSIDERA'!'TON OF CONDITION ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICAT~ON ,
4. ZE-102A-77. Aqricul*_ural to Multiple Familv Suburban
Location Sectton 9, Townshtp 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M.
The S 125 feet of Lot 57, Pinecroft Ftrst Adclit~on.
b. Appltcant Tom S. McQueen
East 23219 Main
Llberty Lake, WA 99019
c. Site Sfze Appraximately 3/4 acres
d. Extsting Zoning• Agricu].tural, established April 24, 1942
e. Proposed Zoning Multiple Famlly Suburban
f. Proposed Actlon Condition No. 6 for ZE-102-77 reads: The
adverttsed property $hall be developed En
substantlal conformance with the develo!emerit
plan oh file with this applicatlon.
The applicant has requested an amendment of
Condition No, 6 to al}ow for a13, 850 sguare
foot expanslon, (Zone Change ZE-4-78), and fer
a revised development plan.
g. Proposed Use of Property Apartment Complex
h. Applicatlon of Zoning Provtston: Chapter 4.21, Sectlon 4.21.040
i. Environmental Impact• A topic of discusslon at this hearing rnay be
whether or not thts proposal wtll have a slgniftcant adverse environrrenta!
~ mpact
iWIa riA ~ ;••~r• ` __:""";;.3+~ .
~ ~0- ` M(` M TGO 11 EAY OR
0 ~ J
Z 50
Z G~ `
0,
~ ~•t sA
2
z o ~
G o 0 ~ Z ~~b.~• ~ ~ l'
° EL P ~4
axwt~vE ;
~d r • O
M rvELL , So Nro 1 _ C,
O
3 `
, BOONE
, • L / c
~
j i ,(113 L
x Y 0 t rJ~1Y=F.
At said time and place any Interested person may appear for, or agelinst, the graantlna_ of
this appllcatlon
AGENDA, APRIL 21, 1978 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-~27/1
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Time• Friday, April 21, 1978, 9:30 a.nu.
Place Spokane County Health District Audltortume
Room 140, West 1101 College
?RECONSIDERAZ'I0N OF CONDITION ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION ,
4. ZE-102A-77r Agricultural to Multiple Familv Suburban
a. Location Sectton 9, Townshlp 25 N., Ranqe 44, E,W.111: o
The S 125 feet of Lot 57, Plnectoft Flast Addl*sone
be Applicant Tom S. McQueen
East 23219 Main
Ltberty Lake, WA 99019
c. Site Size• Approximately 3/4 acres
d. Existtng Zoning: Agricultural, established Aprll 24, 1942
e. Proposed ZonLng Multiple Family Suburban
f. Proposed Actlon• Cond[tion No. 6 for ZE-102-77 reads: The
adverttsed property shall be developed in
substantial conformance wlth the development
plan oh file wlth thls appldcation.
The applicant has requested an arnendment Qf
Conditfon No. 6 to allow for a 13, 850 saLAare
foot expans ton, (Zone Change ZE, 4- 78), a-nd fmr
a revised development pl.an.
g. Proposed Use of Pruperty Apartment Complex
h. Application of Zoning Provision Chapter 4.21, Sectlon 4.21.040
i. Envf.ronmental Impact• A toplc of discusslon at thls hearing may be
whether or not this proposal wtll have a sl.gnlff.cant adverse environrmenta~
f '?P~ * _ _ _ ~ _
' ~ ~ . ~ -~dvw
9 ir~Dla ri
• ~ MCN GEfiy
O J
11 410 9o
O a r.t :A
a
i c ~ ~
C ; < z ~
g O ~e~t+ '
c
o ~
Axw vE ~
SlmTO
M ~ E L L ~ 0
.
3 '
, gooNE
L+
- ~ Wx~m
At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or aghln$t, ±he acantRng of
thy s appllcation
AGENDA, APRIL 21, 1978 TELEPHONE
SPO-KANF COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
TMme• Friday, Aprll 21, 1978, 9:30 a.ro.
Place• Spokane County Health Dlstrict Audttor",uma
Room 140, West 1101 College
-REC0NSIDERATTON OF CONDITI4N ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED APPLICATION
. ZE-102A-77r Agricultural to Multlple Famlly Suburban
a. Location Sectton 9, Tawnship 25 N., Range 44, E.W M.
The S 125 feet of Lot 57, Pinecroft Fltrst Ad&t!on'
b. AppZpcant Tom S. McQueen
East 23219 Main
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
c. Site Size Approximately 3/4 acres
d. Extsting Zontng Agrlcultural, establlshed April 24, 1942
e. Proposed Zoning Multiple Family Suburban
f. Proposed Action• Condition No. 6 for ZE-102-77 reads: The
adverttsed property shall be developed fn
substantial conformance with the develovrienfi
plan oh file wtth thls application.
The appltcant has requested an aanendment of
Condition No. 6 to allow for a 13, 850 square
foot expanslon, (Zone Change ZE-4-78), and for-
a revlsed development plan.
g. Proposed Use of Yroperty• Apartment Complex
h. Appllcatfon of Zoning Provtslon Chapter 4.21, Sectlon 4.21.040
I. Environmental Impact• A toplc of dtscusslon at thls hearing may be
whether or not this proposal wfll have a slgnlficant adverse envlror_rne*_?ta'
~mpact • _
C) ir~oia ric ~ :'•~r ' - . -
'
- IMC N GO tM ERY Dfl
O
CD J
n...,.r n z
90 `
Q ~ r t tA
~
~
z I ~A
o ~
= tc~a r wn E 6d
. Ci 0 ~ ~
ir U4 0
o ►
~qx w E ~ y a
M rvELL , ssNro I r
O
3 '
B o oN F-
~ ,
~ L
SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT
Inter-4ffi ce Communication
Ddte: A-pril 10, 1978
TO : Spokane Coun&y Plann,~ Comm Qn_~~tt,~e nt,ion . John T. Sweitzer
FROM: Dennis Kroll -
SUBJECT: zE 4=78 ana zE-102A-77 _
I have informed applicant Tom McQueen that the drasnfield systems for the
existing duplexes conflict,with the proposed positioning of the apartment
building. McQueen indicated he wovld relocate the duplex drainfields.
r
It is apparent that the property is of sufficient area to properly accommodate
~ a11 the drainfield systems needed.
` Di~fsk
E c E ~ v E'D
APR 13 '1978
SPOKANL C4llHTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SCHD-ADMa118
5POKANC VALLtq FIRt DtPARTAtNT
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99Z06 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
R OAel ;
April 17, 1978 i -
,
Mr Fred Dayharsh, P1 anni ng Director
~ Spokane County Plammng Corrunission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99201
~ Dear Mr DaYharsh A_ .
,
~ ~ .
The fol 1 owi ng Zone Change ~as been revi ewed for f i re protection _
~ ZE-5-78 Pearson, Boyd y& i tt,1 er4. ~y
~ There are exis ng msi ns ~~nN,this area but hydrants wi 11 .
. be needed.
F t
ZE- 4- 78 McQueen
There ar i;ting ains in this area but hydrants wi11 _
be neede~
~ _
r
~ ~ZE-102A- 77 McQ ue/~en',~---"='~'~
Ther~e ~$re e~ys~~n 4~a~ s i~-p thi~ area~but hydrants wil l be'n~eoed'.L j
,
~ ZE- 38- 78 Spp , Co - P1 ann i ng CoMMj$s'4ison
Md ':,id hydra~p,~,4 -Q"~~~;~Qtrbe i ns~tal l ed ~ 1 th is area
. ZE-40A717~ S15 cot/
; a ai~ns nd h dr+~pt~ po~, ~abe ~nstal4a.~c~ fn\tl~is area. -
✓ _ ~ 44 ~ f 4 Y r,r r~h I.f r., ~ I
y z h_~ ~h 1
r
~ oo ~
- `Lt of Inspectors
,
w
AC sn
E C E I V E
,
~ APR% 1 8 1~M"u
SPOY(AN E COU IN7Y
PLANNINC DEPARTtdEPt1
PRE YENT FIRES SAVE LI VES . - . . .J
ZE- l0:Y+ 7 7
A hearing to consider chang tng the Zoni.ng Map from Agricultural to Multfple Family
Suburban on property described as the South 125 feet of I,ot 57, Pinecroft Ftrst Addition
i.n Section 9, Townshlp 25 N., Range 44, E.W. M., Spokane County, Washfngton.
(Between Bates and Bowdish Roads, north of Misston Avenue.)
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTIATG
STATE OF VVASHINGTON )
) ss
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
, betng first duly sworn on oath,
deposes and ays:
That I am a cltizen of the United States of Amerlca, and a resident of the State of
Washington over the aqe of 18 years.
.
VL, I personally
, 19-
That on the day of k06 0
posted one (1) or more true and cor ct coptes of ine hereto attached and incorporated
herein by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING in a consplcuous manner at each of
the followlnq locatlons, to-vvit:
.
u. t
2, YLP 11.~2- t ll...L b 14
3, "Q 5 &9QVsTFS
,
DATED THIS 1~6` DAY OF , 19
SIGNED
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of , 19
Notary Publtc fn and for the State of
Washtngton, restding at Spokane, WashingCos
lqw ,6d►e ~ ~ 44~. ! tT w
At said time and place any interested person may appear for, or against, the granting of
this appllcation
AGENDA, APRIL 21, 1978 TELEPHONE N0.• 456-227,e
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Time- Frlday, April 21, 1978, 9:30 a. tio.
place Spokane County Health District AuditQ!tum,
Room 140, West 1101 College
RECONSIDERATIO1V OF CONDITTON ON PREVIO'USLY APPROVED APPI,ICATION ,
4. Z33-102A-77r Agrtcultural to Multiple Familv Subutban
a, ~ocation Sectlon 9, Townshlp 25 N., Range 44, E.V4T a L1P o
The S 125 feet of Lot 57, Ptnecroft Ftrst Add~tiona
b . Applicant• Tom S. McQueen
East 23219 Main
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
c. Site Slze• Approximately 3/4 acres
d. Exlsting Zontng Agrlcultural, establlshed Aprtl 24, 1942
e. Proposed Zoning Multiple Famtly Suburban
f, Panposed Action: Condltion No. 6 for ZE-102-77 reads: The
advertlsed property shall be developecl In
substantlal conformance with the developmen"
plan oh flle with thls appkication.
The applicant has requested an amendment of
Condttion No. 6 to allow for a 13, 850 square
foot expanslon, (Zone Change ZE-4-7E), and fo!-
a revtsed development plan.
g. Proposed Use of Property• Apartment Complex
h. Application of Zoning Provlsion: Chapter 4.21, Sectlon 4.21.040
i. Environmental Impact• A toplc of discusslon at this hearing may be
whether or not thls proposal will have a slgnlficant adverse environmenta"
~ =lmPapt * - ` _
._j i rJ0 IaI r iA ~ " .
' L` , _ aw;S ' MCNTGOYEfiY ~
~ 0 J
l~'Y m ~
90
z _
s~ Q G~
a r.t'1f
i'
Z o Q
~ ~ ~ -j
I a . ~
g 0 ~ Z
~ - eftmdt
oa q.X v1r timL &V E~ 4 , a
~ • , 0
M ~N E Ll. , si Nro 0
~ O
3 '
, eooNE
~
At said time and place any Interested person may appear fo r, or against, the granting
of this appiica tion . t `
AGENDA, SEPTEMBEx 16, 1977 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Time• Friday, Septemb-ar 16, 1977, 9:30 A. M.
Place Conference Koom A, Court House Annex
(Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
7t7NE .FaAN G.
S. Z. E-10 .-77 , AQncultural to Multinle Family Suburban
a. Locatfon• Section 9,Township 25 N. , Range 44, E.W.M .
The South 125 feet of Lot 57, Pinecroft Firs t
Addition.
b. Applfcant• Tom S. McQueen
East 23219 Main Avenue
Libetty Lake, WA 99019
c. Site Size. Approxfmately 3/4 Acre
d. Existing Zonfng• Agricultural, established April 24, 1942
e. Proposed Zoning: Multiple Family Suburban
f, Proposed Use of Property: Apartment Complex
g. Application of Zoning Provisfon Chapter 4, 21, Section 4.21.040
h, Environmental Impact A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not thfs praposal will have a
significant adverse environmental fmpact.
,
~i~ • y ~ 1-~i~y. ~Y•~r..~~~.~
~ INDt a ri ; Q` ►f N jo Iv w r
. SO ~ M(`N7GONERY DR ~
r
Q
Z 90 '
~ ~ Pt 11 3
g p ~A s.oiR.► ~
2 ~
° m E~ Z 4 ~ 1~iaRrff
~ r
o ~
axw ~ vf- . ~
O
M iV ELL S#~TO i N T(a. s.CALO
_ 0 ~wot
• 3
BooNF-
• - <
O "
~ ix W
Q~grrB T
~ x 2 ~ DESMET Avc ~
- 6, 0 a~r
a I >
3" a Q
arAL ao w
J
~ T ~ - Q tr
Y ~ (Ai
>
' -
-6-
~ ~ _
~ FINDINGS
ZONF CyANGE
.
1. ZE-102-77 - AGRICULTURAL T4 r;ULTIPLE FAtgILY SUB!lRBAN• t~ct 4ueen
Thi s request was revi ewed by the Pi anni nq Commi ssi on on Sept 3mber lf , 19770
, The Corrmission concluded that ttie applicants development prolosal was
rather vague, ana that a detailed development plan and an elE vation render-
ino be reviewed by the Planning Staff and Commission before attion is taken
onythe zone reclassification.
I. SUM!`IARY •
The applicant's proposal is compatible with surrounding land use-, is con-
sistent w3th recent Planning Cammission Zone reclassifications2 i: consis-
tertt wtth the Reglonal Comprehensive Plan; has or can provide adecuate pro-
vis i ons for circul ation , sewaae di sposal ,water and fi re protectiol.
II. GE"ERaL INFOR~~,ATIO0•
A. Existing Land llse - Site three (3) two-family residential uoits,
duplexes
to the north vacant property9 I-90 Freeway
to the south sinqle famiZy residential uses, duplexes
to the west Senior Citizen Center, Valley Mission Park
to the scuth west apartment unitse one four-unit apartment,
a court apartment, anef a lE-unf t complex
to the east single family residential uses9 dup]exes
B. Zoning Hi story of Area
Request Date Action Taken
to the north to Acaricul tural 3-24-42 Approved
to Taro-Fami 1y P.esidential 10-14-76 Approved
to the south to Avricuitural Suburban 4-12-55 Approved
to the east to Agricultural 3-24-42 Approved
to the west to Agriculturai 3-24-42 Approved
to the south vtest to liul ti Fami1 y Sutiurban 2-17-77 Approved
to F-ulti Fami ly Suburhan 2-13-69 Approved
C Comprehenslve Plan
Proposal is consi stent wi th the F,egional Comprehensive P1 an
Explanation The Regional GomDrehensive Plan indicates the site as
being appropriate for residential uses, the site is lo-
cated on the edere of a res 1 dential neiQhborhood, fronts
on an arterial and has access to shopping, community
services, public facilities, and an arteriai system.
III. SPECIAL INF4R4ATIQN
A. Circulation
Frontac,e T,yne aDT
Mission Avenue Secondarv 39740
Arteria1
- 1 -
,
~
ZE-142-77 - AGRICULTURAL TO P9LILTIPLE FfMILY SUBURBAN, (Continued)
Engineer's Revier+• The Spokane County Enoineers have requested that
all access from the site be restricted to Bowdrsh Road and/or 6ates
Road
B. Sewage Disposal
This project f s located i n an area wi th soi 1 s c1 as -,i fied by the Soi 1
Conservation Service as suitable for installation t?F individua] on-
site sewage disposal systems. The area 1s, however, located over the
Spokane Aquifer. A study is currently under way to determtne the
degree to which subsurface disposal of sewage treatt,ent effluent
may po] ] ute the Aquifer. There is very 1 i ttle proba» ) i ty that this
project in itself will have more than a slight impaci on the Aquifer.
Hvwever, taken in conjunction with the overall urbanization of the area,
some other sewage disposal rnethod wi11 most 1ikely be required in the
future.
From an environmenta] health viewpoint the project appears feasible.
N4TE The applicants revised deveiopment plan shows a primary sewage
treatment facility; septic tank and iarge drainfield.
.
C. ldater
Avai1 abf l i ty through - Modern Electri c and Water Co.
D. Fire Protection
Fire Ma1 ns NotL Avai 1 abl e
Fire Wydrants Uot avai]able
E. Staff Environmentai Review
Concl uded that a decl aration of fdon-Siqni ficance be i ssued.
IV CONDITIONS.
i'he Planning Department Staff feels the following conditions would be
appropriate if the proposai is approved
1 Dedication of the east ten (1N feet of the advertised property for
right of way purposes.
2 Dedication of a twenty (20) foot radius at the southwest corner of the
advertised property (northeast corner of Mission Avenue and Bowdish
Street), and the Southeast corner of the advertised property (north-
west corner of Mi ss ion and Bates
3. Improvement of rlission Avenue along the project perimeter to Spokane
County standards. Improvements shail include curbs, sidewalk, drain-
age control and pavinq to existing pavement.
4 Improvement of Bowdish Street and Bates Street along the project peri-
meter to Spokane County standards. Improvements shall include curbs9
sidea~alk drainage control and thirty (30) feet of paving.
- lA -
•
A
ZE-102•77 - AGRICULTf1RAl TO MULTI.PLE FAMILY SUSUR6A~~~ (Continued)
5. Access permits for the advertised oroperty shall be obtained fran the
Spokane Gounty Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits
for the praject.
6. The advertised property shall be developed in substantial confornrance
with the development plan af file with th3s application.
7. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by
aehicles shall be maintained in hard surface paving.
8. an on•site storm drainage system for the project shall be approved by
the Spokane County EngineQr's Office.
9. A speclfic landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for main-
tenance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be
submitted for the project prior to release of building permits.
10. The applicant shall prov3de a performance bond to cover the cost of
the requi red 1 andscapi ng prior to rel ease of bui 1 di ng pernt ts .
11. Installation of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the require-
ments of the Sookane Valley Fire Marshal.
12. Sewage disposai shall be approved by the Spokane County Nealth District.
- 18 -
McQUEEN REALTY, INC
A Real Estate Investment Company
E 9212 MONTGOMERY #104 • SPOKANE, WA 99206 • TEL. (509) 922-0615
, ,
Planning Commission
I am requeating an amendent to Condition 6 of zone change ZE 102-17 that
states " The advertised property shall be developed in substantial
conformance with th!ft developement plan on f ile with this appltcation."
with the rezoning of the property adjacent to the subject property of
ZE 102 we can leave the existing duplexes undirsturbed and put the additrional
~ units on,the adjacent property according to the archetectsl" plaBS.
This will make amore attractive plant. The idea as discussed with
several of the neighbors met with much more approval than the original
plan. The idea of iklapinP the new units,behind the existing is
much more appealing.
The property owners as well as myself will be both pleAsed and grateful
if the Planning Coaunission wf11 grant this request.
Sincerely;
Tom McQueen
A • g, ~
1 i
a 1 ~p _
h
~
~
~
r►
r
Y ~
JF-
SPOKANE COUNTY PLAN1\TINC CO1V1NlISSION
N 811 jefferson
Spo'cane, Vvashington 39201
November 29, 197;
Honorable Board of County Commis.cioners
SAOkane County Court House
Spokane, VVA. 99241
Gentlemen:
,
At the reguZar hearing of the Spoicane County Planning Cor, mission on
Friday, 1'Jovember 18, 1977, at 8• .0 A.1Wi, to 12 15 P iVi recon,% ening at
2• J 0 P. M. to 5:45 P.11I! , in Conference Roo m"A" , County Court 3 2ous e
Annex. The enclosed action was taken and is recommended to th Board
of County Commissioners.
Nlembers present• YVlr. NicCoury, lvirs o Byrne, Mrs RawlincJs (present
for DisQUSSion Items), IVTessrs Kennedy, Nain, and Thornas. Planning
staff present Sweitzer, Davis and johnson. Engineers Office. Finney.
Prosecutor's Office: Einacfo e
Sincerely,
SPOKANE COUIVTY PLANNING COiVlIvitSSION
Ted iV:cCoury, Chairalan
Fred L. Dayharsh, Director
FI, D/c' j
Official unutes and recorG of action taken
by the Spo.ane County 'lanning Cor-misslon
at their regular hEaring held on
iVovE -nber 1: , 1977
A
1VlINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSIOAT HEARING QF rTOVE1VlBER 18 r 1577
VITHEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Co►nmission did hold a public
meeting on IVovember 18, 1S 77, to consider thE testimony aad relquests of several
applicants, objectors and other interesteci parties concerrifng the W-low referenced
zone classification upgradings, and othe: items of business, and
WHEREAS, at said hearing, opportunity was afforded those favorfng and
those opposing all items af business, and
WHEREAS, Mr. McCoury, Mrs Byme, and Aflessrs. Kennedy, Main and
Thomas were in attendance and constituted a quorum, olad
Vb'HEREAS, the Spokane County Planning Commission fully conszdered fihe
testimony given, the enviranmental review, and all other evidence presented,
recommends to the Bosrd bf County Commissioners the following•
>
I ZE-102-77, AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMII.Y SUBURSAN McQLIEEIU
That the zone reclassiftcation request be approved to the MultiplP ramziy
Suburban Zone (File Numbe, ZE-102-77) subject to the conditions as con-
tained in the Planninq Staff's fiadings, datpd November 18, 1577, and tha-c
a proposed declaratfon of Non-Siqniffcance b~ issuedo The Commissicn
conclucled that the applicant's proposcil was compatible with surrounding
land ase, and consistent with recent Lone Reclassiffcations within this
area (IVlotion by 1Vfr. Thonnas, seconded by Mr k Qnr.edy, vo±2 was un-
animous ) .
2 ZE-lP~-77, ACRICULTURAL SUBUItBAN TO LOCAL BUS-INESS OPP<JRTUNTTY
INVFSTMENT CO That the zone reclassification revuest bE deaiedo '"he
Coanmission concluded that this request would constitute a sFoL 2on.e
(Motion by Mr. Thomas, seconded by 11/Irs. Byrne, vote was unanimous)
A second motzon was made and approved requiting the Pzannang Department
staff to plaoethis application on the De ~~iriber I99 77 planning Commiss'on
TH.earinq, but advertised from AGTttCUL'1 'U: 'NL w RESIDEIVTLA"L OFFICE.
ZE-113-71, AGkiGUILTURAL TO MULTiI'LZ T'41\4ILY SUBURBAN• GUTHRIE.
That the zone reclassification request be ieferred to the Board of County
Co:-nraissionerG because of a two-to-two T.iote (AIlotion by Nirs e Dvrne #or
denial was lost for a second, motioi, by Nir. Main for approval, secanded
by Nxr YcCoury, vote 2 yes, 2 no)
a ZE-12;s-77, AGRICULTLURAL SUBURBAN TO MULTIPLE FA1VlILY SUBURBAN
VAP£Y. Dlet the zone reclassificatfon request bQ spproved to the Mul.tiple
Family Suhl..:ban zon::, subject to the conditions as containec in tMe
Planning Staff's tinuin3s c?ated November lE, 1977, and that aDeclaration
of Non-Significanco be isLcLed The Comrr is -31on concluded that the pro-
posal vvas compatfble wiLh tre surrounding land uses, and consistert with
recent zone recl~ ~Cificstion «ithin this area (Vote was unanimotis).
- i--
4k
/
~
5. ZE-149-77, TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO MULTIflLE FAMILY SUBtR BAN:
WARD. That the zone reclassification re quest be continued to the
December 1377 Planning Commis s ion Hearinq o NOTE• The applicant re-
quested a one month continuance.(Vote was unanimous).
6. ZN-152-77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO
RESIDENTIAL OFFICE• WELLS That the zone reclassification request be
approved to the Residential Office zone, subiect to the conditions as con-
tained in the Planninq Staff's findings, dated November 18, 1977, and that
a declaration of 1Von-Significance be issued. The Commission concluded
thiat the proposal was compatible with surrounding land uses, and con-
sistent with recent zone reclassification requests.(NOTE: Mr 1Vlain
left hearing room due to a conflict of interest. Vote to approve was
unanimous)
7. ZE-I55-77, TVb'O-FA1ViILY RESIDENTIAL AND AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL
OFFICE: WOOD. That the zone reclassification request be approved to the
Residential Office zone, subject tio the conditions as contained in the
Planning Staff's findings, dated November 18, 1977, and subiect to the
additional condition that the applicant install a residential type fence
si x(6) feet in height along the east property lfne of the advertised site.
(NOTE• Fence to be sight obscuring). The Commission concluded that the
proposal would be compatible with surroundzng land uses, (if fence provided),
and is consistent with recent zone reclassifications with the area In
addition a declaration of Non-Significance was recocnmended. (Motion by
Mrs. Byrne for appraval but with a revised plot plan reorienting the office
structure toward MuZlen Road was losfi for l.ack of majority; motion by
Kennedy for approval with a revision to conciition #5 be made to provide
maximum privacy for residences to the east, was carried, vote 4 yes,
1 no)
8. ZE-170-77, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE. VANCE.
That the zone reclassification request be approved to the Residential Office
Zone, subject to the conditions as contained in the Planning Staff's
findings, dated November 18, 1977, and that a Declaration of Non-
Significance be issued. The Commission also amended condition 1Vumber
#3 to require revisions made to the par'cing lots and landscape sreas ta1`jle
order to comply with minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements The
Commfssion concluded that the proposal was compatible with surrounding
land uses, and consistent with recent zone reclassification requests (Vote
was unanfmous) o
9. ZN-171-77, MULTIPLE FAIVIILY SUBURBAN TO RESIDEN TIAL OFFICE: LA VICTVE.
That the zone reclassification request be approved to the Residential Office
Zane, subject to the conditions as contafned in the Planninq Staff's findings,
dated November 18, 1977, and that a Dec,taration of iVon-Significance be
issued. The Commission concluded that the proposal was compatible with
surraundfnq land uses, and consfsrent with recent zone reclassffication
requests. (Vote was unanimous).
•
r
~
.
10. PUDE-1-76, FINALPLANNED UNIT DEVELC,PI1tIENT PLAN: RIEGEL. That the
Final Planned Unit Development Flcin for Riegel Hefuhts Addition No.2
be approved subject to the conclitions as contained in the Planning
Staff's Findings, dated IVovember 18, 1977, and that a Declaration of
Non-Significance be issued a(Vote was unanimous)
11. ZE-174-77, ACRICULTURAL TO SINCLE FA1VrILY RESIDENTIAL: SPQKANE
COUNTY PLANIVING CONiIvlISSION. That the zone reclassification be
approved to the Single Family Residential ZOne.(1Vlotion for denial by
1VIrs Byme lost for a second; Motion for approval by IVir. Kennedy
seconded by lvir. Thomas; Vote 4 yes, 1 no).
12 ~~OVS-77, ACRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL:
SPOKANE COUNTY PLARTNING CONIMISSIOIJ That the zone reclassification
be approved to the Single Family Residential Zone (Vote was unanimous)
OThER BUSINESS
1. The Planning Commission approved Mr ivlcCoury's motion to place all
unfinished business on the December hearing, and to place half of the
subdivision requests , all of the zone changes scheduled for the month
of December, on the january Hearing Agenda. The motion made special
mention of the continuance of ZE-103-77, Agricultural to Mining Class
II , S& F Construction Company to the january Hearing.
2 1v1r. jerry Ressa requested that ZW-108A-77, Agrfcultural to Freeway
Commercial, Cox, be placed on the january 1978 Aqenda as per Section
4.21.0.220 of the Sno{ane County Zoning Ordfnance (The Planning
Commisston'svaEe to place this request on the january Hearfnq was
unanf mous)
Nr Bill Pittman requested that the Pl.anning Commission place zone
rEClassiffcation ZN-2 )1-77, Agricultural to Single Family Residential on the
january 1978 Hearing. (The Planning Cornnnissfon's vote to place
ZN-2 31-77 on the january Aqenda was unanimous)
4 Nr. Kennedy made a m.otion to place ZE-200-77 on the january 1978 on
the january 1~78 Planninq Commission Agenda. (Vote by planning Commfssion
was unanimous)
4
~
~
Staff Report on Progress of Comprehensive Plan Upaate and Coordinati-ig
Committee's Work
Mr Fergen explained that at the I1I'ovember 16t i Planning Com cnission public
hearing, there was a request for observations -egarchng the Coordinattng Committee
Mr Fergen then made a report regarding the 1e test Cbordinati 1g Committee
workshop held IVoverriber 3rd to briefly review he Preliminary Draft Agricul-
tural Suitability Report. His report explained vhat the Coordiiiating Committee
did at this meeting and the consensus feeling of its members vR as to:
1. Deemphasize the use of the report at this time .
2. To qet the staff working on a model for Agricultural Suitab lity Maps by
using an existinq use map, a so-ii quality map, and a comiialabili'tly
of adjacent land uses map.
3 Not mail the aforementioned report out aat thi s time.
4. And to have the staff gather new fnformation for the report.
It was also explained that the *ninutes of the Coordinating Committsel would be
sent to the Planning Commission as soon as the staff received and re liewed them.
The Planning Commission responded affirma'Lively when they were asLE d if they
wanted a further report on the progress of the Stia*_abzlity phase of t1he G=prehensive
Plan Update
The points covered reqarding Suitability progress were:
1. Our time frame has been pushed back about three to six months .
2. Suitability major section reports have been written with the Prelimina cy
Draft pgriculture Report published and the other four reports soon to b 1
published
It was requssted by the Planning Commission members that the following lten s be
given to them as a result of the dfscussion that followed the proqress report
1. Preliminary Draft Agricultural Suitabflity
2. Copy of tbe minutes of an early Coordinating Committee that was attended
by Coznmissioner Christensen and dealt with the function and role of the
Coordinatunq Committee.
3. A written report done by a staff inember, approved by the staff and Planning
Commission regardir.g structure and responsibility of the Coordinating
Committee.
4. IVlinutes of a meetinq in june 1976, when Advisory Council Chairmen were
elected and that they were asked to do some collating of goals and
obje~tives.
-1-
~
Two people from the audience gave testimony regarding the Coordinating
Commfttee and the progress of the Comprehensive Plan Update Some points
or questions asked by these two indfv±du4ls were
1. Does the Coordinating Committee have a veto poweO
2. How does a citizen get informed of these meetings and are they open ?
3. That the staff do work regarding Suitability and bring it back to the
Coordinating Committee.
4. Good planning is a logical thing and the citizens should be partici-
patinq in it because they know the most about past planninq mistakes.
The Planning Commission after review of the proposed short plat ordinance and
after two public hearings (September 23, 1977 and November 9, 1977) instructed
the Planning Department staff to investigate some possible modi#ications to
the proposal, includinq•
1r A 10 acre acreage exemption
Combining preliminary and final short plat procedure
3) Modification of Short Plat Revfew Committee procedure
4) Ntodification of appeal proceciure and notice of action
5) Further study of the fee scheduie.
The Planning Commission instructed the staff Lo make the appropriate changes to
the ordinance and set a date for further review by the Commission.
Commzssfoners' Concern - Five Njile Praine Comprehensive Plan Study
Commissioners members received a letter from City Plan regarding their request
for an extension of time to becember 1, 1977 to comment on the Draft En-
vironmental Imgact Statement Ivlr. Ferqen reported that the staff would send a
letter to City Plan regarding the staff's concems over the Draft Environmental
Impact Statement. He briefly explained the two concerns of the staff which
were. 1) Concerning present policy regarding existing Comprehensive Plans,
and 2) the possibflity of Five Mile Prairie containing historiq~archeaological
sites. Mr. Clegg, Director of the Spokane Citv Plan Commission then said that
they would be qlad to extend the time period if it would facilitate comments
Mr Clegq gave a brief explanation of where the Draft E.I.S. came from and
answered questions of the Planning Commission regardfng it.
Commissioners Kennedy and Main initiated discussion on the prnbability of
limiting the items appearing on the Commission`s Agenda. Their concerns are
that the meetings are becoming too lenqthy which may result in unsounded
decisions.
-2 -
y
a
~
FINDIMGS
ZONF CHANGE
1. ZE-102-77 - AGRICULTURAL TQ I9ULTIPLE Fa14IILY SUBUR3AN. Mcqueen
Thi s request was reviewed by the P 1 anni ng Commiss ion on September 16, 1477.
The Commission concluded that ttie applicants development propasal was
rather vague, and that a detailed development plan and an eievation render-
ina be reviewed by the Plannina Staff and Commission before action is taken
on the zone recZassification.
I. SUMMARY
The applicant's proposal is compatible with surrounding land uses, is con-
sistent with recent Planning Commission Zone reclassifications, is consis-
tent vai th the Regional Comprehensive P1 an 9 has or can provide adec?uate pro-
vis i ons for ci rcul ati on , sewage di spasai , water and fire protectl on.
11. GEtaERAI INFORMATIOM•
A. Existing Land Use - Site three (3) two-family residential units,
duplexes
to the north vacant property, I-90 Freeway
to the south single family residential usesy duplexes
to the west Senior Citizen Center, Valley Mission Park
to the sQUth hest apartment units; one four-unit apartment,
a court aoartment, and a lE-unit complex
to the east singie famiiy residential uses9 duplexes
B. Zoning History of Area
Request Cate Action Taken
te the nvrth to AQricultural 3-24-42 Approved
to Two-Family P.esidentiai 10-14-7E ,4pproved
to the south to ArriculturaT Suburban 4-12-55 Approved
to the east to Rgricultural 3-24-42 Approved
to the west to Agriculturai 3-24-42 Approved
to the svuth west to "lulti Family Suburban 2-17-77 Approved
to Mul ti Fami ly Suburhan 2j13-69 Approved
C. Comprehensive Plan
Proposal is consi stent wi th the Fegional Comprehens ive P 1 an
Explanation The Regional Gomprehensive Plan indicates the site as
betng appropriate for residential uses, the slte is lo-
cated on the edge of a residential newhborhood, fronts
on an arterial and has access to shopping, corrimunTty
services, public facilities, and an arterial system.
III. SPECIAL INF4RMATION:
A. Circulation
Frontaqe Type ADT
Mission Avenue Secondary 397Q0
Arteria]
- 1 -
. ~
~
ZE-102-77 - AGRIClJLTURAL TO MULTIPLE FPVILY SUBURBaN, (Continued)
Engineer's Peview• The SpoQcane County Enaineers have requested that
all access from the site be restricted to Bowdish Road and/or Bates
Road
6. Sewage Jisposal
Thjs project is located in an area with soils classifie+d by the Soil
Conservation Service as suitable for insta]]ation of indTVidual on-
site sewage disposal systems. The area is, however, located over the
Spokane Aquifer, a study is currently under way to determine the
degree to which subsurface disposal of sewage treatment effluent
may pollute the Aquifer. There is very little probability that this
project in itself wi]1 have more than a slight impact on the Aquifer.
However, taken i n conjunction wi th the overal l urbaniZati on of the area,
some other sewage dYSposai method will most likely be required 1n the
future.
From an environmental health viewpoint the project appears feasible.
NOTE The app lz cants revi sed developrrent p] an shows a prima ry sewage
treatment faci1 i ty; septic tank and 1 arge drainfleld.
C. Elater
Availability through - Modern Electric and 14ater Co.
D Ff r@ Protectt on
Fire Mains NaL avai 1 abl e
Fire Nydrants Not available
E. Staff Environmental Review
Conc1 uded that a decl arati on of Cdon-Signi ficance be 1 ssued.
IU. CON0ITI4NS.
The P1 anning Department Staff feel s the fol l owi ng condi tions woul d be
appropriate if the proposal is approved
1 Dedication of the east ten (10) feet of the advertised property for
right of way purposes.
2 Dedjcation of a twenty (20) foot radius at the southwest corner of the
advertised property (nertheast corner of Plission Avenue and Bowdish
Street), and ttie Southeast corner of the advertised property (north-
west corner of Mission and Bates).
3. Improvement of Misslon Avenue along the project perimeter to Spokane
County standards. Improvements shall include curbs, sidewalk9 drain-
age control and pavinq ta extsting pavement.
4. Improvement of aowdish Street and Bates Street alons the project peri-
meter to Spokane County standards. Improvements shall include curbs,
sidewaik drainage control and thirty (30) feet of paving.
- IA -
~
~
ZE-102•77 - AGRICULTURtiL TQ IAULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Continued)
5. Access permits for the advertised property shall be obtained fran the
Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits
for the proJect.
The advertised property shall be deveioped in substantial conformance
with the devel opment pl an of fi le with this apol i cation.
7. Any portlon of the pro3ect which is to be accuptied or traveied by
vehicles shall be maintained in hard surface paving.
8. an on-slte stom drainage system for the project shall be approved by
the Spokane County Engineer's Office.
9. A specif3c landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for main-
tenance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be
submitted for the project prior to release of building permits.
10. The applicant shall provide a performance bond to cover the cost of
the required landscaping prior to release of building permits.
il. Installatton of fire mains and hydrants in accordance with the require-
ments of the Sookane Valley Fire Marshal.
12. Sewage disposai sha11 ae approved by the Spokane County Health District.
_ Ig -
At said tirrie and plac, iy interested person may appe fo r, or against, the granting
of this application.
AGENDA, AUGUST 12, 1977 TELEPHONE NO. • 456-2274
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION _
Time• Friday, August 12, 1977, 9•30 A.M.
Place: Conference Room A, Court House Annex
(Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
ZONE CHANGE
5. ZE-102-77 , Agricultural to Multinle lFamily Suburban
.
a. Location• Section 9,Township 25 N.,Range 44,E.W.M.
The South 125 feet of Lot 57, Pinecroft Firs t
Addition.
b. Appli.cant• Tom S. McQueen
East 23219 Main Avenue
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
c. Site Size• Approximately 3/4 Acre
d. Existing Zoning• Agrfcultural, established April 24, 1942
e. Pcoposed Zoning• Multiple Famfly Suburban
f. Proposed Use of Property• Apartment Complex
g. Application of Zoning Provision• Chapter 4, 21, Section 4. 21. 040
h. Environmental Impact A topic of discussion at this hearing may be
whether or not this proposal will have a
significant adverse environmental impact.
C) IN01A PJI.' ~ :o r ~ - -------•r-cr
flo
, O MC NTGO MERY OR ~
Ay m J
90 ~
- Q ~ P t •J~ )
~ 4
Z o3
z
~ s ~ z 4 1 1~OJt'~~
• 0 ~
A X w! V E y~~l Y
0
M r1+ELL S'~TO SINT(a. = G 5WAA~
° ~ I Wot
i 3
B00NE
i DES M ET Av c`
0
a r f 3'~ a Q
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~tTA t, DO t+ W
v
Li O_
x ~
> {
_ . .
-6-
lzC-~oZ,77
PA PIC REF. # TI'Z~- I02-77
,
.
THRESHOLD DETERMINATION
. ~
DECI.ARATIOPJ OF
(proposed/ inal)
~
Now Stewt 1:# ca.ycX
(significance/nonsignificance)
1. Description of Proposal: ~Z2NF CHXyLr-- Z,{-"- Lw - 7-7
2. Prc,aonent: T4m
3. Cnntact Person: 4;F Z Phone:
3. C'nunty Action(s) Requested: Ze►vrr- CMw&r _!07 _ 7-7
a~ Tp M #CC% .
4. Location of Proposal: N. r . ~orZ 0c }
S. Lead Aqency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON
This proposal has been determined to ru oT' have a significant adverse impact on
the environment. An EIS is _t~!pT required under RCW 43 . 21C .030 (2) (c) This
clecision was made after review by the County of a completed environmPntal checl:list
and oth- r informatiun on file with the lead agency.
. Responsible Official:
Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration:
(name ) (name)
siQnature (siQnatui'e
;
Li.t1e) Qu2rcTait_. (title~ C~a~~g~ I
(dept.) CAti►Ai sN G nEs-r (de t C.
date )/77 date A7-77
` Departmc:nt Reference No.: ZE -104~r77
(See Reverse Side)
looo- 5PO~AlSt VALLffl lIRt DtPARTAtNT
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 a TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
~~eArl
Auqus t 1, 1977
A
H
Mr Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director -
Spokane County Planning Commission
North 811 3efferson
Spokane, Washington 99201
Dear Mr. Dayhars h •
~ IAXNN.
v. ~ ewed for f.
~ re protecti on :
The fo11 owing Zone Changp as ;ee
r I
existing mains
- ZE-101-77 MILL 1~ INVESTThere are
sur ouf~ding 'thdivision, but new mains and
hy rfits wi l1 be req4i red to serve thi s area.
ZE-54-77 RA~~IGUST -Ther e are exrs~Cing mains surroundi ng
th~.s subd>>vislon, bu.t nevf mains and hydrants
'i~.1'be r,equired tw'serv~ehis area. ~
/ZE-102-77 M QUEE -Main an hydr-ar~ need to be installed
y nr;th~s axeawr,
_ ZE-105-77 - RE~GAN-There a~ xi s,ting mai s ~surrounding
~ t~is subdtvisiani44ut Nne~Mai n nd hydrants
~.i11 be req.~r~rei~ itc sei"v4~th i r a.
~ ~ 3 ~ 4ti* ta.t J
C y"'➢ +
ZE-106- , YAK D~3`IE~~an.d Q"SE~Q Ther+~a st~ng
mai ns~surroqnd.frtg~thfis~sub ivSia►n, but new
ma i nr and hYdrants:,vil be ~ red to serve
. N.,th,is~~~,~rea.1
4 i T y I `O y .iy4(a
Si nce l,y,~ ,j "3s ~
Ij a~ oa
!:t of-4rrspeetops = - - -
t
AC/sn R E C E I V E
AU G 4 1977
SPOKANE COtJWTY
PLANNING UEPARTMENT
~ PREYENT FdRES SAVE LI VES ~
~
~
5POKANC VALLtq FIRt DtPARTIAtNT
s044& GM4 A& liw"emo ,a4 A* I
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE, WASHINCTON 99Z06 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700
November 14, 1977 I
. ~
Mr Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director
Spokane County Planning Commission
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99201 ~
Dear Mr Dayharsh '
The following Zone Change has eviewed for fire protection
ZE-102-77 McQUEEN - Mai s n4 h ants need to be installed in
this area.
ZE-103-77 OPPORTUNIT VESTI' ~ENT C - There are existing mains
in this , but Pydrant ~11 be needed
ZE-110-77 GUTHRI - ".i n a hydrants'~n ed to be i nstal l ed i n
this r 0 \
ZE-133-77 CA Y- r'e r'~' is r~g ma~.ns ~ this area, but
hy r ts 11 b ed lP--~4t ~
ZE-149-77 ~W - 14~i a s V~i tie n e ed to be installed
a a
ZE-155-77 000 - ~Ther NmO~in rea, but
n s ~ ~
! { ` , ~ , ~ 7,, ~
ZE_170 - = ns ~ a but
ant~
PUD - -76 DE el opm nt- t
jRIEGEL~~ f to_ be _ nstal l e this area
6 9' ~ j , , IJ~ Y 9
~ u ~L \
A1 Cook
Lt. of Inspectors
AC: sn
PREVENT FIRES ~ SAVE LI VES
1
e ~ ~ Z
' OFFICE OF THE ~
.
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
oote , 19 77
To f)#S-r-- - LTrEpiTloo-A (or-E ~R~tH ~rL
Zqam-T '~E Z
From C
Subiect Zoa ~ (06%r+C¢E ZC- 10 2 - 7 '7 UAL S
16 % L I T Lf Li
NtAR#N& : NoV 18, 1977 NOV10 1977
NorC : PVCASC 2CviEW
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
, _ -
,E.,
P ~
/
• ~
~ C er ~
1~ 1 r ~
/
~
~ ►
a
- ~ ,
~ ~ ~a ~
t ~
Jlj DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Y V , ~~~~-•f
4 4 j ~ _03 TELEPHONE 458 - 4730
a. ~
NORTH 811 JEFFERSON
~ ~Y~~~~ ~a _s~-~, j • ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTOIV 99201
August 9, 1977
5?OKANE tOUN'Y COURT HOUSE
Fred L Dayharsh, Planning Director
Spokane County Planning Department
North 811 Jefferson
Spokane, WA 99201
Dear Pdr Dayharsh
In reviewing the August 12, 1977 agenda, I find sone
problems with zone changes ZE-101-77 and 7E-102-77.
In the first case, the Park Department has a small
play area 11 blocks atvay and I a.m wondering if the
traffic generation might be a serious problem
The other zone change request is directly east of
our Senior Citizen Center and is the main entrance
to our horse riding facility The present traffic
is an extremely da.ngerous situation now and adding
additional housing to this corner could only make it
worse
Thank you for the opportunity to review the zoning
request
Sincerely,
.
LBERT D ANGOVE
' Park and Recrea on Director
AA wh
R E C E I V E -
AU G 1 01977
SPOKANE C4UNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SPOKANE GOUNTIf
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~~k A
N 811 JEFRER90N t1rR 1178
SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 89201 i'~ '~I.a~~ 2 ,o
♦ ~
, ~
Charlott alser r E C~ I V E
N 112 oodruff S t.
spo ne, WA.99206 APR 1~ 1978
Q-NE ~Z
~p SPOKANE COUNTY
° p R 17 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
~3AE~~E T~l f 0(iWARD 'a- ~
~~:~'~r:U T0 qCNDER s 1313 ti
R ~
~~y ~ ~ - • ~~ct~='- -
SPOKANE COUN'Tlt s P M
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~
N 811 JEFFER60N i~ A P R
~ SPOKANE, WABHINGTON 99201 I9 7
h- ~
~
lu y ~ , a~y~4 L
_ S.
j
~
W ~ ~pR 719?a
~ ~ Richard D. Winegard
E 11605 Mission Avenue CpuN~Y
Spokane, WA.99206 SpOKAN pEpARjMEI~j
,,wF'I<< to FaPi'aInRO 37~
;Li uNrs TO SLNCI( K ~ ~
- - _ - - - - - - . _ .
C ♦
SPOKANE GOU(VTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT c, N 811 .1EFFER90N
APRi1 7~ j /
JT
o~1
~j SPOKANE. WA8HINOTON 99201 {r-~,,F'!~
Q~~
~
a
Eugene j Lauhon E c E I E
E 9806 16th Ave
w_.... Spokane, WA 99206 APR 2 r. 1978 ►
~ ~ E
gi , SPOKANE COUi~TY
~CRESWARD a AP~'R 9"' ~ PLANNING DEPARTI~ENT
ji~-$~ TO FOR ~ s B ? ~ A A~
-4" TO SENDER ~
~
~
!
SPOKANE COUNTY ~ - - "
PLAIVNING DEPARTMENT
N 811 JEP'FERSON ~ ~
6ePR117a th7
n`-
SPOKANE, WA9HINGTON 9920I
~ E'[i y ~ u ~ .d D i
ECEIVED
Const e M Hobbs
W 20 2nd APR 19 1978
S ane, WA.99204
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
. v\
s-': aPR t3
SPOKANE COUNTY
~ ►c _
PLANNING DEPARTMENT dCO~
N 811 JEFFER80N
SPOKANE, WA6NINGTON AA2Ot APR ii 70 ap
P' 4 a 41 ~.t 1 r~
l ;
~ E
~Edwin C. Deiter AP R 21 197B
E 1828 Bridgeport
Spokane, WA 99207 SpOKANE COUNTY
PLANI~I~IG DEPARTMEPJT
~i a~- _r~Z: APR PO -F
~ARD - ~ M co
J ~ 1.~ i 3 ~o
~ I E Ltt~ti"~ ~ G ~~QER
_ _ _ e
At said time and plac ny interested person may appE fo r, or against, the grantinrq -
of this applica tion .
AGENDA, AUGUST 12, 1977 TELEPHONE NO. • 456-2274
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMiVIISSION _
Time• Friday, August 12, 1977, 9•30 A.M.
Place• Conference Room A, Court House Annex
(Use Mallon Avenue entrance)
7.ON . .HAN GE
S. ZE-102-77 , Aqricultural to Multiple Famflv Suburban
a. Location• Section 9,Township 25 N.,Range 44,E.W.M.
The South 125 feet of Lot 57, Pinecroft First
Addition.
b. Applicant Tom S. McQueen
East 23219 Main Avenue
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
c. Site Size• Approximately 3/4 Acre
d. Existing Zoning• Agricultural, established April 24, 1942
e. Proposed Zoning• Multiple Family Suburban
f. Proposed Use of Proper[y: Apartment Complex
g. Application of Zoning Provfsion• Chapter 4. 21, Section 4.21.040
h. Environmental Impact- A topic of discussion at thfs hearmg may be
whether or not this proposal will have a
signfficant adverse environmental impact.
j -r
A. ° INDIA rJA
MCN7GOMERY
m J
Y ~
90
O C. ' Pt SA
Q Q ~ ~ ~oAA ~O
z
}
- x
c K
o o Z 'a~$ aR
} S , ~ EL
, Q lrrf . 1
o; Axw vE ~~L Y
~
1L 3 . . • 0
M IV ELL SsNTO~ 51 N Tq. = 4 s+C~~,~
0 ~ Woe
. ,
3
~ B O ONE
Q, O 2
OC ~ i m5"s' DES M ET Pv c a
~ x , or
~
a f e, 3 ~ Q 4 >
~
~ ~ drLa L D O tu w
_ U < ~ O v
tJ
7
6
r
MINUTES
September 16, 1977
7. NE HAAT GE
5, ZE-1 02-77 - AC"RIC:jILTi1'RAL TQ_MIILZP .F. FAMIL.Y StIBi7R N• MG DU' ..N
Planning Commission Recommendation: To C_gntinLe thivA_=e. r~.Plas,~,~s ficak,ic r
re-Quest until .sLCh tYme as the ~~nn i_~~ suhm#ta a mor cLet~ilPd d~~lo m, n
Dl a. n_,and elev~tiQn rendering of the eron, _l mul t3 nle famil ruct re _
R . REASONS :
1. The Commis sion Concluded that the applicants development
proposal was rather vague, and that a detailed development
plan and a elevation rendering should be reviewed by the Planning
Staff and Commfssion before action is taken on the zone reclas-
sificatfon.
B. ENVIRO NMENTAL REVIEV'tr.
That a declaration of non-significance be issued.
C. GENERAL DATA:
1. Location• Between Baites and Bowdish Road, north
Mission Avenue.
2. Applicant• Tom S. NicQueen
East 23219 Main Avenue
Liberty Lake, WA 99019
3. Site S ize: Approximately 3/4 Acre
4. Exfsting Zoning: Agricultural, established April 24, 1942
51 Proposed Zoning Multiple Family Suburban
6. Proposed Use of Property; Apartment Complex
7. Application of Zoning Provision:
Chapter 4.21, Section 4, 21. 040
8. Environmental Irnpact• A topic of discussion at this hearing may
by whether or not this propsoal wfll
have a significant adverse environmental
impact.
-5-
S
~ OFFICE OF TNE
SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIDN
Date ,Y , i9-Z~
To__L6eNw ~ ~~i4L7X d_ ~fTk'!C~
From `r, cw&/TZ__~. 20it1/Al~/ AQw//l•
Subject 2z-- ~ ?T •~~i~i,c ru~L ~ ~i4~/.~ ~~uit°~~t/
r
A0474
FINDINGS
ZOiVE CHANGE
i ZE-102-77 - AGRICULTURAL T4 Mt1LtIPL.E FAtIILY SUBURQAN, 710ueen
This request was revievred by the Planning Corrmmssion on September 16, 1977.
The Commission concluded that the applicants development proposal was
rather vague, and that a detailed development plan and an elevation render-
ing be reviewed by the Planninq Stafg and Commission before action is taken
on the aone reclassification.
I. SUP99ARY •
The applicant's proposal is canpatib]e with surrounding land uses, is con-
sistent with recent Pianning Cammission Zone reclassificationsg is consis-
tent with the Regional Comprehensive Plan; has or can provide adequate pro-
visions for circulation, sewage disposal, water and fire Qrotection.
ii. GEVERAL iNFORMATION•
A. ExYSting Land Use - Site three (3) two•famiiy residential units,
dupiexes
to the north vacant property, I-90 Freeway
to the south single family residential uses, duplexes
to the west Seni or Ci ti zen Center, Ual l ey Mi ssi on Park
to the south west apartment units; one four-unit apartment,
a court apartment, and a lf-unit complex
to the east singie family residential uses9 duplexes
B. Zoni ng History of area
Request Date Action Taken
to the north tv Aaricultural 3-24-42 Approved
to Two-FamiTy Residentzal 10-14-7f Approved
to the south to Aaricultural Suburban d-12-55 Approved
to the east to Rgricultural 3-24-42 Approved
to the west to Rgricultura] 3-24-42 Approved
to the south vrest to P9ulti Fami ly Suburban 2-17-77 Approved
to Multi Fam11y Suburban 2-13-69 Approved
C. Comprehensive Plan
Proposal is consistent a!i th the Feqional Comprehensi ve P1 an
Expianation The Regional ComDreMensive Plan indicates the site as
being appropriate for residential uses, the site is lo-
cated on the edae of a residential neTqhborhood, fronts
on an arteria] and has access to shopping, corrmunity
services, public facilities, and an arteriai system
III. SPECIRL INFORMA►TIQN
A. Girculation
Frontage Type ADT
Mission Avenue Secondarv 39740
Arteria1
- 1 -
ZE-102-77 - AGRI Cl1LTURAL TO MULTI PLE FAf ;I LY SU6UPBAN, (Conti nued)
Engineer's Revievt The Spokane County Enoineers have reques:ed that
ai 1 access from the site be restrTCted to Bowdish Road and/o • 6ates
Road.
B. Sewage Disposal
This project is located i n an area with soi 1 s cl ass j fted by the Soi 1
Conservation Service as suitable for installatzon ofi individua] on-
site sewage disposal systems. The area is, however, located over the
Spokane Aquifer. A study is currently under way to cetermine the
degree to which subsurface disposal of sewage treatmeit effiuent
may po11 ute the Aquifer. There i s very 1 i ttle probab 1 ity that thi s
project i nitsel f wi11 have more than a s 1ight impact )n the Aquifer.
However, taken in conJunction with the overall urbanTtttion of the area,
some other sewage disposa 1 method wi11 most 1 i kely be riqui red i n the
future.
From an environmental health viewpoint the project aFpe3•s feasib]e.
NOTE The applicants revlsed development plan shows a pr+mary sewage
treatment facility; septic tank and large drainfield.
C. liater
Avaiiability through - Modern Electric and Water Co.
D. Fi re Protection
Fire Mains NctAvailable
Fire Hydrants Not avai lable
E. Staff Envlronmental Review
Concluded that a declaration of edon-Siqnificance be issued.
IV. CONDITIONS.
The Planning Department Staff feeis the foliowinq conditions would be
appropriate if the proposal is approved
1 Dedication of the east ten (10) feet of the advertised property for
right of way purposes
2 Dedicatian af a twenty (20) foot radius at the southwest corner of the
advertised property (northeast corner of P1ission Avenue and 3owdish
Street), and the Southeast corner of the advertised property (north-
west corner of Mission and Bates).
3. Improvement of Piission Avenue alonq the project perimeter to Spokane
County standards. Improvements shali include curbs, sidewalk9 drain-
age control and pavinq to existing pavement.
4 Improvement of aowdish Street and Bates Street along the project per3-
meter to Spokane County standards. Improvements shall include curbs,
sidewalk drainage cantrol and thirty (30) feet of paving.
- lA -
ZE-102-77 - AGRICUITURAL TO PAULTIPLE FAt9ILY SUBURBAPa (Continued)
5. Access permits for the advertised Qroperty shall be abtained fram the
Spokane County Engineer's Officp prior to release of building pemits
for the project.
6. The advertised property shall be deveioped in substa ntial conformance
raith the development plan of fiie with this application.
7. Any portion of the pro3ect which is to be occupied o• traveled by
vehicies shall be maintained in hard surface paving.
8. An on-site storm drainage system for the project shall be approved by
the Spokane County Engineer's Office.
9. A specific landscape plan, pianting schedule and Qrovisions for main-
tenance, acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator sha11 be
submltted for the project prior to release of building permits.
10. The applicant shall provide a performance bond to cove r the cost of
the required landscaping prior to release of buiiding permits.
li. Installation of fire rrrains and hydrants in accordance with the require-
ments of the SQOkane Valley Fire Marshal.
12. Sewage dispasal shall be approved by the Spokane County Health District.
_ 18 -
~
~
5POI~ANE VALLtq F.Rt DtPARTANST
EAST 10319 SPRAGUE A1►E o SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 * TEtEPHONE (5G4j 928-1700 . Z~4 ,R 114JAO~ Y"~ elfAel
September 6, 1977
r
{
f1r Fred Dayharsh, P1 anning Di rector
Spokane County Planning Gonvnisslon
-North 811 Jefferson ~
Spokane, Washirrgton 99201
Dear Mr. Dayharsh•
The fol1owing Zone Change has bee eviewed far flre protectian:
~
~ ~
ZE-101-77 Mi 1 iway Investane~ s-There .are existing mains ~surroundtng
this subdi v1 s~ory, but new m i ns and hydrants wi 11 be
required to ser~re thi;s are
ZE_ 54-77 Raugust-Ther ~ are exi I stzng maqns surroundtng thls sub-
,
dzviszan,/hut,_new mains and hydrants will ae reauired
to serve/thi,.s area /
ZE-102--77 McQueen alr~ nd'hydrants need to ~e instal 1 ed in
~ this rareaf~,
- ~ f f ~
, ~
ZE-105-77 Re g~rn{ There ~re exxst~i.ng. main~ su~rrQU~n~iing thls
s4bd`i vz s~~o,n,/but ne►~ mat and,fF~y►dra t~s ~tz Z 1 be requl red ~o~ser~e tf~,is area~~-anr~~fi~ e hydra~t~`o \eins
ta
lled
for~4 c-upantymave~ into' b i1 dirr~ ZE-106-17 a.~n iDa ~e& DeShaao-~Ther~,_are.existi`ng ra--irrs surroundzng .
hydr n+ 111 be
I~subidiv ~.s~ivrr; ~but ~-~ma~tr~s~ anc~~
~,.~re~ut red to se~e this
~
ZE-03--77 Coxi & Bates-~►ere are exi's~~~i`g ma~zns in this area, but
hydrants `wi 1 I' b~ needecf..~.~
~ •
~ ~UL. _ ~ ~R.. J~ ` u'~ f ~ ns
. , - . ' _ - .
IN Li
SEP 7 1977
~
- SPOKANE CQUNTY
PLANNING pEPARTMENT ~PR.~ ~~NT FIRES SA~~ ~IVES ~
L
J
7
•
.
.t. ~
APPLICATiON FOR SPOKANE COUNTY PI.ANNING COMMissloTl
Z O N I N G H E A RI N G Court House, Spokane, Washington
Date May 19 , 19 7 7 Application No.; ZE-102 - 77
i1ame of Applicant Tom S. McQueen
E 23219 Main Libert L
Street A.ddre s s Clty yake State wa
Telephone No. 509 255-6831 off 924-0840
EAisting Zoning Classification Agricultural
Date Existinq Zone Classification Established Apr-il 24, 1942
Proposed Zone Classification Multiple Family Suburban
Proposed Use of Property. Additlonal family dwelling unjts
Legal Description of Property:south 125 feet of iot 57 pitlPGraft Fi rat aa , t„r
Site SiZe approR 3/9 acre
Section 9 Township 25 Range 44
Street Addres s of Property E 11507- 11523 Mission (three duplexes )
Who Holds Title to the Property; Tom McQueen ssubject to mortgage by Fidellty Mutual
If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest
in it ?
Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record,
thefr address, within <<UO feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property.
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS t1/IUST BE ANSVVERED•
1. iiiihat are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional
zoning'~ Housing demand
~ - -
•
.
~
2. vvhat facts justi#y the proposed zone reclassification based on the advancement
of the public health, safety, and qeneral welfare %
Increased demand for adequate housing
1
3. vvhat effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the value and
character of ad j acent property i
Ajacent property values will be supported upward
Can a reasonable return from or reasonable use of the property in question be
secured under the existing zone classification ~
Yes, the egistiog classification is not the hYghest and best use
of the property
,
A plot plan or sketch rnust be attached contafninq the following information
(a) Scale of the drawing.
(b) North point.
(c) AlI dimensions of property, existfnq bui],dings, and proposed buildings,
(d) Location of all existing and proposed buildings, or additions, with
di.mensions to the nearest property line.
(e) Off-street parking area.
(f) Defined points of access and egress.
(g) Date of the drawing.
THE NECESSARY FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATZON.
The recommendation of the Planninq Commission in this matter wi11 be presented to the
Board of County Commissioners ior final action. Any person desirinq to contest the
recommendation of the Flanning Cammission must request, in writing, a hearing bPfore
the Board of County Commissioners no Iater than ten (10) days followinq the date of the
public hearing held by the Planning Commission.
Lqnd))
C~ Sig
r~ •
a
►
.
LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYIAIG TAXES ON PROPERTY
Spokane County Code Number: ZE-102-77 Owners and Persons within 400 feete
Application is for OL Zone Change application, Agricultural to Multiple Family
Suburban
Certification of Title Compan,y: I hereby certify that the following list of nemes and
addresses consistzng of this and the following j pages has been prepared from the
latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct.
Signed by ,Q For
6ZSPOKANE COUNTY PLA
Date. ?4tV PROPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED
LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN AlMrfrION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRW BIK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T)
.
PINECROFT lst
( ss[oN-
T y XOPERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED 09543.-0614
p Spokane County DATE 7 7 , 86
~ BY v-~
T~ lSSlON ,
0 i p~20?ER7Y OWNERS NOTI tED
T DATE /77' -0621
~
~~~3
pl Spokane County BY 89
!
Ti 0 SPQKA E COUNTY PLANPIfNG COMMiSSt0N
~
Ti t~~11•~g 09543-0624
MATf~ ~ ~ ~
0, Spokane County ~ 92
2L 4OLef ~ F
T 0
09543-0643
T
0 Spokane County E. 11123 Mission 95 & 98
T I
oi T~ 09544-0542
r
C.M Breckenridge Blk 51 except
Q ' W- S l f P P t ~
'-'I~bi c xer s on .~ump & x
T' Irrigation Spokane, WN 99220
(Corltinued on next page)
~a
,
~ Pinecroft lst Page 2
LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T )
0~ T o4544,.0544
9Q~ 0 4 B~lk 53 e.gcept
p Charles M. Breckenr~ e-7 o 5- w lb~r ~~i West 10 feet 53
Dickerson Pump & B.ox 2823
T Irrigation Spokane, WN 44220
0
~ T 09544~a573
Z;t 29-t Qf Lt 55
01 James Brent McKinley , N, 21 t Qf Lt 57
f East 12419 Sanson Ave
T,JamesgR McKinlev , SDokane. WN 99216 ,
0
T 04544,rG572
0 Tommy S. McQuee~n ~ 1a~ 3 q~~o ` e s~ ce2~ ~~f Lt 5~
1 3 p ~ t
T Fid. Mut. Sav. Bank 1r1-31102
0 ~
T / 04544R0543
' 9al~ O(0
0 Charles M BreckenridgeZ/--I 17os (`IIIIIUe p~l_ Nq 1705 wilbur Rd. 52
Dickerson Pump & Box 2823 T Irrigation Spokane, WN 99220
0~
T / 09544-0545
p Charles M Breckenridge f,4,~~,5- North 54' Blk 54 54
Dickerson Pump & Box 2823 T Irrigation ~ Spokane, WN 99220
0
, uy!)44--U5.1 0 ~ T N t 16 2 2Wi lbur Rd
N 110' of S. 260t0 Lance D. LaLone of tracts 59,60&61
` LAJ(~ ~ Q~ ► vefS, d R V
T I
~ Seattle First Natt1 Ban 12074 aq20
41
0
T 09544-0567
p Leonard P Brown
T Commerce Mtg 30632
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ' Augusta Sub Page 3
~
LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T)
T •
0
~
r rfj1 ..i QO 95`7 4rQ 6'7 6
El 11623 ,Augusta A~*e
p Ervin R Brile~ 5~ 3 0;. LQt 1 1
a
T (;oMMe,=e mz., U0.22681 ,
4 i a
r O
t
' T nnq44_Q.647
°tqal6 E 11617 Augusta A-re
0 Gerald R. Rice f~c1 . T.ot- 9 1
.
TWash Mut. Sav Bank 0130211323290 ,
0
T 09544-0648
i E 11611 Augusta A4Te
0 Cher,yl A Anundson Lot 3 1
T Bancshares Mtg. 1708067
0
T ~ 09544-0649
Con t ~ qq~cl'l E. 11605 Augusta A
0 Te
s ance M Ho~.bs .ao ~ ~ Lot 4 1
T Columbia Mt . 146-81 ~4 -
g 3953
,
0
, T 09544-0750
0 James E Erlendson CA- Lot 1 2
y
T Columbia Mtg 146-5-811878-4
0
T o9544-0751
i E. 11616 Augusta A e
p Eugene J Lauhon c ~21 Ic~~ Lot 2 2
T Bancshares Mtg. 1505532
0
T o4544_.0752
'~p Edgar Orval Garrison E.11612 Augusta Ay
. , Lot 1 ~ 2
~
T Commerce Mtg 00018851
~ ~ i ~ ~
~ ~ Augusta Sux Page 4
LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LO'rS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T)
T -
0
T 09544,0753
~0 Edwin C De~ter 5~° 7 E a 11bQ4 Augusta Av~
Lot 4 2
, _ .
T Seafirst Mtg CorP F 103709-2
0
T 09544-4754
0 Richard D Winegard 'ri- ti,,,i Lot 5 2
1
T Pac Nat'1 Bank of Wash 3326888
0
T o4544-0755
~ 0" ' E. 11611 Mis $ion A-eye
0 Aldon Oster L= 016 I I /'fl, s< n Lot 6 2 11 T Lincoln Mut Sav Bank 01,0137517
0
T o9544v-a756
E. 11617 Missipn A-e
0 Larry D. McGinnis Ia;;j7 ~rl Lot 7 2
T Spokane Mtg 0000315
0
T o9544-0757
E. 11623 Nlisslon 0 Herbert M Will ll 6 2 3 r a n Lot 8 2
T SPokane Mtg 0000120
0 VAIL SUB
T 16542-1501
ssion ~e
0 Alvin J. Wolff 5 -717 0,v, c,, Lot 1 1
c/o o f ennea Inc.
.
T Alvin J. Wolff Box 14729, Spokane, WN
~y2l'+ . ,
0
T / 16542-1502
N . 1510 Woodward RA.
0 Alvin J. Wolff
T Alvin J Wolff Lot 2 1
` ox ~ ~po~Ca 1
~ i,~~
~ I ~
' OPPORTUNITY Page 5
LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T)
T 0
T 16542.t.0232
81k 4 except S.470t
p Lou~s E Johnston and except V 400t
N 122 Raymond Road
T Louis E. Johnston Spokane, WN 99206
0
ib542-0235 '
T N. 1507 Bowdish RD,
Ne 1201, Of S. 470'
0 Rudolph Jacob Puhek except W.400 t of
f N, 1507 Howdish Road Blk 4T Rudolph J. Puhek Spokane, WN 99206
0
16541-024 0 T E. 11502 Mission Ave
i
N 110' of W.1-2 of
4 DouRlas J Rider Blk 8 exc E 200'
~ E 1151b Mission Ave. ~and exc St
T Doue;las J Rider Spokane, WN 99206
0
1b541-0241 Ti N 1512 Bowdish Rd,
5 y~t of N. 2uUt
0 Douglas J Rider of W of Blk 8 exc
~ E 11516 Mission Ave and exc
T Douglas J. Rider nokane., WN 99206
0
` 1b541-UL24
T E. 11516 Mission A e
W. 1001 of E. 200'
0 Dou las J Rider ~ of N. 200' of W~ o
~ ~ 11516 Mission Ave Blk b
T Douglas J Rider Xokane, WN 99206 ~
OI I
16541-0225 I
T E. 11522 Mission Aie.
E. 100' of N 2001
0 George W. Anderson of Wk of Blk 8
E. 11522 Mission Ave. T George W Anderson Spokane, WN 99206
,
0
1b541-U236
T N. 1426 Bowdish Rd.
N1--2 of W--12- exc N 0 MarSaret A Millsap 200' & exc E. 1351 ,
~ .'G""$ow s Blk $ '
T Edward H Millsap Spokane, wN 99206
~
OPPORTUNITY Page 6
LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T)
r •
0
T 1654i.-o23!4
E t 135 t of NW qtr
0 James Fi Nessl,y , o#' Blk 8 exc N 4 200'
E. 11603 lq~w~ell .Aye.
T Jaems Ii Nessl.y SDokane. WN 99206
0
T 16541-02-36
1
E. 135' of N Q 115' 0 Jo Ann Phillips of SW atr of Blk 8
' N. 3504 Edgerton T Jo Ann Phillips SDokane. WN 99206
0
16541-4237 T lY . 1422 Bowd 1 s h RD
N, 115' of SW qtr
0 Roberta M Arndt , egc. E. 135 t of
N. 1422 Bowdish Rd, Blk 8
T Roberta M Arndt SDokane. WN 99206
0 M~S N P NES
16541-0132 T E. 11604 Mission A-re,
Eugene E. Stern N,S~~ 0 f): N. 148 36'
0 Don D Skillinsstad ~►~<~.jp Lot 3 2
~ N. 1124--Woodruff St,
T Charlotte Balser SDokane. WN 99206
0
16541-0133 T, , W 11603 Maxwell A e.
S. 107,64t of Lot
0 James H Nesslv W. 85t Lot 4 2
E. 11603 Maxwell Ave
T,James H Nesslv , SDOkane~ WN 99206
0
16541R013 0
T E. 11610 Mission Aye
W, 72t Lot 2, W,721
` 0 Margorie U Peterson , of N. 98 28' Lot 41 2
T Sherwood & Roberts 2420000
0
16541,0131
T , ET 11616 Miaslon
Lot 2 egc W. 72'
0,Pgter Lazar~ q8' 28' ~ 4 eU 2
2 1I6'1G"Pfission Av~ 721
T I Peter Lazaro Spokanea WN 99206
~
~ 1
MISSION PINES SUBD'--- 3ION Page 7
LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION
OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK
PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T)
0
' 16541-0134
a
T Es 11611 Maawell
Lot 4 e.xc N 98 26"
0John W. Adams and exc W. 851 2
E 11611 Maxwell A.ve, T John W Adams Spokane, WN 99206
0
T 16541,4128
F pPeter Lazaro Wt 30t Lat 1 2
h 11 O 1 O a~lis sion Ay e
T Peter Lazaro Spokane, WN 992Q6
0
16541,4124
T E, 11620 jji$sion
0 Ellen K Johnson Lot 1 exc W t 30t 2
E 11620 ~iasiqn A~ve~
T,Ellen K Johnson S.pokane? WN 99206
0
16541-.0135 T N. 1513 Wilbur
0 Anna M Hull LQt 5 2
T Lincoln Mut Sav Bank ~06~.0015982 q~' .9 o/
0
06541-0136
Ti ER 11621 Maxwell Aye
q q.9 e~ C- 0 Vic A HerrinRton r- idA -1 Lot 6 2
T
Commerce Mtg 0'32410 ,
p WICKLAND SUBDIVISION
16542-0301
T, N. 1421 Bowdi sh Rd.
0 George H. Mavo. Jr. N. 75t Lot 1 1
1 T ,B,~.nc§jap.res MtLr. , 1701251
0
16542-Q303
Ti E. 11411 Ma.gwell Aire.
4 Wi 11iam G. ThayPr L,4t 2 1
T John Hancock Ins L-4111850
~ ~ ~ ~
T
RECEIPT ua e19~ 8101
~
Rece i ved ro ~
Mdress
•8ollars
For
ACCOUN7 HOW PAIp S~KANE COUNTY FLANNnqC DEPAATMENT
A CO UNT I I ICASH I AMT. PA10 I I CHECK
BALANCE MOtVEY B
OUE ~ I ORDER I y
8K806 a.el(p►m