ZE-203A-77
A NOTE TO THE FILE
7Z,, p A TE
RE:
cbe , , .
).ayy . ,
_ C 'be
100
,
.
BY : -
Spokane ounty Public Works,
Transportation . - r Section,
D 1 of County r .
Memo
To Tarnmy Jones
Fram Scott Engelhard
Date 11l16199
Re ZE-203A-77 Change af Gonditaon
TransportatiQn Engineerang has no objeciion to the proposed eliminatron of BOCC Condition #4 for the
abave referenced zone change. The appEicant Rs advised that any proposed improuements to the site
shall comply with #he current drai,roage guidelines and road standards for Spokane Coun#Y.
i-
PUBLIC NOTICE PACKET
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
I picked up the Public T~Ltice information regarding D~Vision of B-iilding and Planning File No.
ZE-203A-77 on this ~ day of a , 1999. The public
hearing is scheduled for December 8, 1999.
I acknowledge the following infonnation is included in the packet which I received.
~I Public Hearing Notice Instructions
'-JMemo to Title Company
~ Title Company and Applicant Certification
~ Assessor's IVTaps with 400' Boundary
Notice of Public Hearing/Vicinity Map/Site Plan Reduction
(Mail out all 3 oaaes)
~ Memo to Mortgage Holder/Lender
(T acknowledge I must fill one out for each property affected by a mortgage)
~ Sign Requirements and Tnstructions
~l SEPA Information for Sign (Red Supplement)
\1 Affidavit of Mailing
Affidavit of Posting
Note: Legal notice must be provided per attached instructions no later than:
November 19,1999
The above completed information and exhibits shall be returned to the Division of Building
& Planning at least 2 days prior to the Public Hearing scheduled for December 8, 1999.
PRINTED NAME: ~ ~ y~7.~~~ ATE: V-4-1
,
SIGNATURE: 4)"I'l
~
ACTIVITY LOG
FILE NO.
PLAiNi R
DATE CONTACT STAFF COiNIiNtENTS
INITIALS
~
~
( i
I ~
j I
I ~
i !
~
RECEIVEG SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
SPOKAINE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
D1VISlON 0F bL1iLD~ric; ~iN-') DATE: September 21, 1990
~
TO: Louis Webster, A.I.C.P., Associate Planner, Spokane County Building and
Planning Division
FROM: Donald T. LYnch EHS II - EHD, SRHD
SUBJECT: ZE-203A-77
The Spokane Regional Health District has reviewed the above mentioned action. The
property is connected to public water and public sewer. We offer no additional
comment.
plann i ng.ltrize-203A-77
A
• o . ounty Public Works,
Transportation • - - • Section,
D • • County • •
~
Memo
To Louis Webster From Scott Engelhard c~ft(~ ,,~,"y~,
~
, Date 9/21/99
Re ZE-203A-77 Change of Condition
Transportation Engineering has no objection to the proposed elimination of BOCC Condition #4 for the
above referenced zone change The applicant is advised that any proposed improvements to the site
shall comply with the current drainage guidelines and road standards for Spokane County
RECEIVE~
SpO~~9E COSPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION
INTEROFFICE MEMO
VlNl`J
DOV~S
DATE: November 16, 1999
✓
TO: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner, Spokane County Building and Planning
Division
FROM. Donald T. Lynch EHS II - EHD, SRHD 4"4)-f-L
SUBJECT: ZE-203A-77
The Spokane Regional Health District does not object to the removal of the block wall
fence to be replaced by a cyclone fence. We offer no additional comment.
planning Itr1ZE-203A-77/Ih
~
A C4MMENTING AGENCIES LIST
ionIII
SPOK~M COUNn DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
> > > FOR STAFF USE ONLY < < <
Name & Type of Project: File
~
Applicant & Phone
Agent & Phone
Date First Comment Letter Sent: Date Comments Due:
Date Second Comment Letter Sente Date Comments Due:
AGENCIES DATE 'I 87 DATE ZNO TO NOTIFY COMMENTING AGENCIES COMMENTS COMMENTS
RECEIVEO RECEIVEO
Spokane Co.: Division of Engineering: Roads v I Division of Enqineerrnp. Development Services. ~
v s I Division of Utilities
~ I Stormwater Utrlity
I Parks. Recreation & Farr
I Division of Lonq Ranae Planninq
I Small Anlmal Control ~
I Sheriff's Offrce ~
I Office of Hlstonc Preservation j
~ Neighborhood Association (name). ~
School District (name and
Spokane Fire District d A
Water District (name and V~1CdJ_f'IiII ~
~ Sewer District (name and ~
s ~ Boundary Review Board ~
~ Spokane Regional Health District '
Spokane Co. Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA)
y ~
~ Spokane Regional Transportation Council (SRTC) ~
~ Spokane Transit Authority (STA) ~
~ Spokane Airport Board
~ Airport Authority (name)•
~ WA State: Office of Archaeology / Misrorical Preservahon (Olympia)
I Deat of Ecoloqv Heidi Renz. SEPA Coord. (OlvmQia)
I Dept of Ecoloqv/Shorehnes (Spokane Office) ~ Dept of Fish & Wildlife (SQOkane Office) I ~
Dept of Health (Spokane Office) ~
.~1 I DeQt of Natural Resources (Colwlle OKrce) ~
I DeQt of Transportation (Suokane Office)
tl i Deat. of Transportahon. Airports Divrsion
I Parks and Recreatron Commission (Wenafchee) ~ US Dept of Transportation: Federai Aviation Admin. (FAA) ~
~ US Forestry Service (USAF) ~
~ US Army Corps of Engmeers
~ US Bureau of Land Management (BLVI) ~
Influence Area (circle): Airway Heights, Latah, Deer Park,
Cheney, Medical Lake, Millwood, Fairchild Air Force Base,
Turnbull Wildlife Refuge
~ Neighboring Town (circle): Rockford, Waverly, Fairfield, Spangle +
~ City of Spokane: Plannmg ~
I Construction Services
~ Dept of rransportat►on I I
I Wafer/HIldro Services I I
~ Burlington Northern-Santa Fe Railroad (BN-SFRR)
~ Electr°lcity (clrcle): VlM/P, BP,4, Modern Electric, ofher?
~ Cable (circle)* TCI, Liberty Lake ~
~ Phone (circle) US West, ofher? ~
~ Others?: (list)
Revised 5-7-98
COMMENTING AGENCIES LIST
4451503
Page: 1 of i
SP41G4EJE GO BLDG & PIANNIN N 41121112000 04;36P
S0,00 Spokane Co, wA
1-9
,(1 I
J ~ l'yi
~p ` •
TITLE NO'I'ICE
FILED BY:
Spokane County Division of Current Planning
1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260
(509) 477-7200
Parcel Nos.: 45164.05841.0528
Legal Property Owner: Nick Abariotes; 11813 E. Broadway; Spokane,WA 99206
The parcel of property legally described as:
OPPORTUNITY PTN OF BLK 154 DAF; 5350' OF El/2 EXC BEG AT NE COR TH
W ALG N LN 261.28' TH SLY TO S LN 261.2' W OF SE COR R TH E261.2' TO SE
COR TH N TO POB EXC RR R/W
OPPORTiJ-NTITY PT OF B 154 BEG 163.317T W OF NECOR TH W97.98FT TH S TO
NL OF SCDA&P RY R/W TO PT 261.2FT W OF EL TH E97.95F T TH N TO POB
EXC N225FT.
is the subject of a land use acfiion, imposing a variety of conditions, by the Spokane
County Hearing Examiner on December 15, 1999. File No. ZE-203A-77 is available for
inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Current Planning.
Release of this Title Notice can only be accomplished through the authority of the
Spokane County Division of Current Planning or its successor by recording of a"Title
Notice Extinguishment" based upon a finding that such release should occur.
BY SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF CURRENT PLANNING:
Name: Tammy Jones Title: Associate Planner
_
r~cw
Signature: AWf 9wo Date:
1:., Property • mb• 45164.0528 ~ Fk FHdp
Summary Perties Values j,eges Safes Info ~ Segterge EventsMaticgs impirauemerrts
Actiue
Propart}r No. 15164.8526 ~~~~e rv- Actiue Eacempfions
t :
Re d r Sta#e Asaemd
Afternate r Improuement Di~
Property N~. _ ~r Personal PreCrninmy Inp Distrirt
Site Address 11809 E SPRAGUE AUE
T
Legal OPPORTUfiITY PT OF B154 BEG 1613FT W OF NECOR TH 1N97.98 FT TH S TO Nl. OF SCDA&P RY RW TO PT 261.21'
Oescription Vd OF EL TH E9735F T TN N TO POB EXC N225FT
Remarks
,
Si~eNOM 338Q3 ILquare Feet Feld Book No. lnspectinn Area t;omm
L$$t Tax Year 1 Milage Rate ♦ TCA t uj0 Neighbarhood Code F3616
,
CurreM l{se Cade 91 Resnlential land - Undioided New
APpraiser Appraisai Ditte Heighborhood ;
~ _ _
. . _ _
I
oata as ot: ~at urday, Jd 000 ~ Fact Sheet Fact Shee1 Report Menu Exit
wIo Taxes with Taxes
iFam VOw
~1
.
114 Start IV M`icrosaft AddressMate ~ Inbox - Ni'icro... V PADAL - jD.,. 936 ANi
Tuesday, Jan 25, 2000 09:36 AM
P. DAL - [D- , o Property ib• 45164.0584 {
;i Fie FWp - Le itinmary Parties ialues Teges Sales Mfo Segigerge EuertsMatlces Improvaments
Property No. 15164.8584 I r Actua Actroe Exaroons _
Reai ~ete Asaessed
r
Alternate ; r Impro~remetrt Dist
Praperty Na PerwW r Pretimim" Imp Distriet
~
Sita AddrBSS 11801 E SPRAGUE AUE
Lega[ 4PPORTUt~TY PTN OF BLK 154 OAF; S350' OF E1.2 IXC BEG AT NE COR TH W ALG N LN 261.23 TH SLY TO S LM
Qescriptian 261.2' W OF SE CO R TH E261.2' TO SE COR TN N TO POB EXC RR R,W
;
Remarkg - :
SizeNOM 19785 Smare Feet FieId Boak t~u. trtspection Area Cumm_
{ _
~
Last Tax Year 1 Millage Rate TCA ~aoo NeigtiborhQOd Code 524516
Currertt Use Code 131 Residt.ntial land Undivided NeiShborh~~ N&m
APpraiser ~ AppraiW Dite Neighborhood
EIFT ' ~ Fact Sheet Fact Sheet .
D~tt ~a of; ~ ~ ~
; wlo Taxes with Taxes flep°rt Menu Exit
,Farn View
: ~~~~~~f-
A.
start UMicro~oft ~1... fAddress~Iate... Inbox • 1111 PADAL - [D... 9:37 ANI
Tuesday, Jan 25, 2000 09:37 AM
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING Ex;AMINER
RE: Change of Conditions in the existing ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
Regional Business (B-3) Zone; ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
Applicant: Nick Abariotes ) AND DECISION
File No. ZE-203A-77 )
1. SU117MARY OF PROPOSAL A.ND DECISION
Proposal: Application for a change of conditions, to delete a condition of approval imposed
on the 1978 rezone requinng the installation of a block wall fence along the north property line
and along the northerly 75 feet of the east property line, and replace such requirement with a
condition requiring the installation of a sight-obscuring fence along the north property line only.
Decision: Approved, subject to conditions.
II. BACKGROUND/FINDINGS OF FACT
A. GeneralInformation:
Applicant/Owner: Nick Abariotes, 11813 East Broadway, Spokane, WA 99206
Location: Generally located along the north side of Sprague Avenue, approximately 1,000
feet east of Bowdish Road, in the SE '/4 of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM,
Spokane County, Washington.
Zoning: Regional Business (B-3) zone. The site is also located inside the Aquifer Sensitive
Area and the Public Transit Benefit Area designated by the County Zoning Code.
Comprehensive Plan Category: Urban. The property is also located within the Aquifer
Sensitive Area, Priority Sewer Service Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the
Comprehensive Plan.
IUGA: The site is located outside the interim urban growth area boundaries designated by
the County pursuant to the Growth Management Act.
Environmental Review: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued on
December 6, 1999.
Site Description: The site is approximately 1.25 acres in size, flat and slopes moderately
from the north part of the site to Sprague Avenue. The property is improved with an automobile
sales lot, office area and storage building. An aging concrete block fence is located along the
west property 1Lne. A 6-foot high cyclone fence that is not sight-obscuring is located along the
north property line of the site.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-203A-77 Page 1
Surrounding Conditions: Sprague Avenue adjacent to the site is designated as a Principal
Artenal by the County Arterial Road Plan, and comprises a major traffic and commercial
comdor through the Valley area of the county. The land lying east, west and south of the site
(across Sprague Avenue) is zoned B-3 and developed for commercial uses. This includes a
restauraalt, automobile sales and commercial strip development. The land lying immediately
north of the site and east of the northerly 75 feet of the site is zoned Urban Residential-22
(UR-22) and is undeveloped. Directly north of such UR-22 zone is land zoned Urban
Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5), which is developed for single-family homes.
Description of Current Project: The applicant seeks a change of condition to delete
condition of approval #4 attached to the 1978 rezone of the site in Building and File No.
ZE-203-77. Such condition required the installation of a concrete wall fence along the north
property line and along the east property line for a distance of 75 feet from the northeast corner.
Such wall was apparently never installed along such property lines. The applicant proposed
instead to make an existing 6-foot high cyclone fence along the north property line sight-
obscuring. The site plan of record attached to the Staff Report illustrates the approximate
location of the existing concrete wall along the west property line, the location of the fencing
required by the 1978 rezone.
B. ProceduralInformation:
Applicable Zoning Regulations: Spokane County Zoning Code Chapters 14.402, 14.504 and
14.628
Hearing Date and Location: December 8, 1999, Spokane County Public Works Building,
Lower Level, Commissioners Assembly Room, 1026 West Broadway, Spokane, WA.
Notices: Mailed: November 12, 1999, by applicant
Posted: November 19, 1999, by applicant
Published: November 19, 1999, by County
Compliance: The legal requirements for public notice have been rnet.
Hearing Procedure: Pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171 and 96-0294
Testimony:
Tammy Jones Scott Engelhard
Division of Building and Plarining Division of Engineering and Roads
1026 West Broadway 1026 West Broadway
Spokane, WA 99260-0240 Spokane, WA 99260
Nick Abariotes
11813 East Broadway
Spokane, WA 99206
Items Noticed: Spokane County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, County Zoning Code,
County Code, Final land use decisions referenced in Staff Report and current decision. County
Resolution Nos. 97-0874 (revising interim regulations for County IUGAs), 97-0321 (adopting
interim regulations for County IUGAs), 96-0294 (Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure),
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-203A-77 Page 2
96-0171 (Hearing Examiner Ordinance), and 85-0900 (adopting Standards for Road and Sewer
Construction, and adopting Guidelines for Stormwater Management).
III. FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
LAND USE ANALYSIS
A.. Apnroval criteria
The County Hearing Examiner Qrdinance authorizes the Hearing Examiner to grant, deny
or grant with such conditions, modifications and restrictions as the Examiner finds necessary to
make a change of conditions application compatible with the Spokane County Generalized
Comprehensive Plan and development regulations. See County Resolution No. 96-0171,
Attachment "A", paragraphs 7(d) and section 11. Development regulations include, without
limitation, the County Zoning Code, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) and the
County's Local Environmental Ordinance (chapter 11.10 of Spokane County Code).
The County Zoning Code references change of conditions applications, but does not
establish specific criteria for approving such applications. Zoning Code 14.504.040 requires that
an application for any significant change to the site development plan approved for a prior
rezone, or to change the conditions of approval imposed on a prior rezone, be approved by the
Hearing Body following a public hearing. Zoning Code 14.402.120 references change of
condition applications related to a prior rezone.
Sulce a change of conditions application modifies a prior rezone action, the criteria for
approving a rezone is generally applicable. Section 14.402.020 of the Zoning Code authorizes
amendments to the Code based on any one of six (6) grounds, without differentiating between
amendments to the zoning text of the code and amendments to the official zoning map. Zoning
Code 14.402.020(1) authorizes the Code to be amended if it is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and is not detrimental to the public welfare...". Zoning Code
14.402.020(2) authorizes a Code amendment where ..[c]hanges in economic, technological, or
land use conditions has occurred to warrant modification of this Code...". These are the most
relevant criteria for consideration of a change of conditions application.
Zoning Code 14.100.104 states that Code provisions shall be interpreted to carry out and
implement the purpose and intent of the Comprehensive Plan, and the general plans for physical
development adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. Zoning Code 14.100.106 states
that when the Zoning Code conflicts with the Comprehensive Plan or other adopted plans and
regulations of the County or other regulatory agencies, the more restrictive provisions shall
govern to the extent legally permissible and the Zoning Code provisions will be met as a
minimum.
The Comprehensive Plan itself indicates that it should be used as a reference source and
guide for making land use decisions. See Comprehensive Plan, p. 2. The "decision guidelines"
set forth in the respective sections of the Plan are to be used as a guide to determine whether or
not a particular proposal should be approved, conditioned or denied.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-203A-77 Page 3
In considering a rezone application, Washington case law generally provides that (1) there
is no presumption in favor of the rezone, (2) the applicant for the rezone must prove that
conditions have substantially changed in the area since the last zoning of the property, and (3) the
rezone proposal must bear a substantial relatlonship to the public health, safety or welfare.
Parkridge v. Seattle, 98 Wn. 2d 454, 462 (1978); and Bjarnsora v. Kitsap County, 78 Wn. App.
840 (1995).
General conformance with a comprehensive plan is usually required before a rezone can be
approved. Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount Vernon, 133 Wn.2d 861, 873 (1997);
Cathcart v. Snohomrsh County, 96 Wn.2d 201, 211-12 (1981). Some cases have dispensed with
the changed circulnstances requirement where the rezone closely implemented the policies of the
comprehensive plan. Bjarrrson v. Kitsap County, supra.; Save Our Rural Environrrcent v.
Snohomish Courity, 99 Wn.2d 363, 370-371 (1983); and Tugwell v. Kittitas County, 90 Wn. App.
l, 8, 951 P.2d 272 (1999).
Washington case law indicates that where a comprehensive plan conflicts with zoning
regulations, the provisions of the zoning code will usually prevail. See Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce
County, 124 Wn.2d 26, 43 (1994); and Cougar Mt. Assocs. v. King County, 111 Wn.2d 742, 755-
57 (1988); and Nagatani Bros v. Commissioners, 108 Wn.2d 477, 480 (1987).
A change of conditions is not a rezone, because it does not change the actual zone of the
property. However, a change of conditions application may significantly affect conditions of
approval, as well as the permitted uses, location of buildings, landscaping, conditions of approval
and other features in a site development plan, approved in conjunction with a prior rezone. The
changed condition application should be justified by the same changes that supported the original
rezone, as modified by any more recent changes in the area.
B. The nrobosed chan2e of conditions, as conditioned, Qenerallv conforms with the Sbokane
Countv Generalized Comprehensive Plan, bears a substantial relationshin to and will not be
detrimental to the public healtla, safetv and 2eneral welfare, and complies with the Spokane
Countv Zonine Code and other applicable development reizulations.
Tn 1978, the site was rezoned from the Multiple Family Suburban (MFS) zone to the
Commercial (C), u.nder the now expired County Zoning Ordinance. The applicant seeks to delete
a condition of approval of the prior rezone, requiring the installation of a concrete block wall
fence along the north property line and the northerly 75 feet of the east property line. See
Commissioners Document No. 78-912, in Building and Planning File No. ZE-203-77.
Effective January 1, 1991, the zoning of the site was reclassified to the Regional Business
(B-3) zone, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The
Program to implement specifically required that special conditions and site planning limiting
development of a site rezoned under the County Zoning Ordinance continued to apply to the site
after reclassification of the site under the County Zoning Code pursuant to the Program to
Implement. See County Resolution No. 85-0900, Program to Implement, Section 1. A change
of conditions is therefore required for the project, under Zoning Code 14.504.040.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-203A-77 Page 4
The site is designated in the Major Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan.
The Major Commercial (C) Category is intended to provide the opportunity for development of
commercial uses, specifically community and regional shopping centers and commercial uses
directly related to major throughways. Major Commercial areas typically require a full line of
public services and utilities, including public sewer.
The Regional Business (B-3) zoning is intended to implement the Major Commercial
category of the Comprehensive Plan, including those policies which encourage commercial
development along Principal A.rterials or highways and the establislunent of regional-serving
commercial uses. Zoning Code 14.628.100. The proposed rezone clearly implements such
policies, since it is located along a Principal Arterial, intensive commercial uses have been
developed on the site, and the project is served by a high level of public services.
The Major Commercial category indicates that buffering or spatial separation should be
required between proposed and existing uses if it is determined that a proposal's physical
characteristics may be objectionable to future development on nearby available lands. Decision
Guideline 6.1.3. Decision Guideline 6.1.8 states that appropriately buffered multi-family
development in such category compatible with existing and potential commercial activities may
be pernutted as transition between commercial uses and low-intensity uses such as single-family
uses. Small-scale convenience stores and commercial enterprises are recommended in the Major
Commercial category adjacent to residential neighborhoods, particularly when located in an
adjoining land use category. Objective 6.1.j and Decision Guideline lk6.1.13.
The land lying between the Sprague Avenue and Main Street in the area is designated in the
Maj or Commercial category. This includes the land lying north, west and east of the site. The
north boundary of the site and the northerly 75 feet of the east boundary of the site border a strip
of undeveloped land zoned UR-22. The record indicates that such land is currently reserved for a
car dealership, although the UR-22 zone would not allow such usage except perhaps as a parking
lot.
The concrete block wall located along the west boundary of the site is dilapidated and has
some gaps in it that compromise its use for screening. The applicant indicates that a sight-
obscuring wall along the north property line would be more durable and provide more security
for the business on the site. The placement of fencing along the east property line would prohibit
use of the property to the east by the current use on the site. The UR-22 zone provides a buffer
between the B-3 zone on the site and the UR-3.5 zone improved with single-family homes
located further to the north. Condition #4 of the 1978 rezone prohibits the installation of any
buildings on the site located further than 355 feet north of Sprague Avenue. No opposition was
expressed toward the proposal by neighboring properiy owners or public agencies.
The project is conditioned for compliance with the B-3 zone, which applies to any changes
to the property from the 1978 rezone. The screening proposed by the applicant along the north
property line is not required by the B-3 zone. No public agencies requested that the
Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) for the project be withdrawn or modified, or alleged
that the project would have significant, probable adverse impacts on the environment. As
conditioned, the proposal will not have more than a moderate effect on the quality of the
environment, and issuance of the DNS was appropriate. The procedural requirements of chapter
43.21 C RCW (SEPA) and chapter 11.10 of the Spokane County Code have been met.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-203A-77 Page 5
C. Conditions in the area in which the propertv is ]ocated have chan2ed substantiallv since the
propertv was last zoned.
In applying the changed circumstances test, courts have looked at a variety of factors,
including changed public opinion, changes in land use patterns in the area of the rezone proposal,
and changes on the property itself. Washington courts have not required a"strong" showing of
change. The rule is flexible, and each case is to be judged on its own facts. Bassani v. County
Commisszoners, 70 Wn. App. 389, 394 (1993).
Recent cases hold that changed circumstances are not required for a rezone if the proposed
rezone implements policies of a comprehensive plan. See 13jarnson v. Kitsap Couraty, 78 Wn.
App. 840, 846 (1995); and Save Our Rural Environmertt v. Snohomish County, 99 Wn.2d 363,
370-371 (1983); and Tugwell v. Kittitas County, 90 Wn. App. 1, 8, footnote 6(1997). As
discussed above, the project generally conforms with the Comprehensive Plan.
Changed conditions which support the change of conditions include designation of the area
within the Major Commercial category, reclassification of the zoning of the site to the B-3 zone,
subject to the conditions of the 1978 rezone, the extension of public sewer to the area,
designation of the site within the County's IUGA boundaries, increased traffic along such
corridor, commercial rezoning and development along such corridor in the area, and population
growth in the Valley area of the county.
IV. DECISION
Based on the above Findings of Fact and Conclusions, the application for a change of
conditions to the 1978 rezone of the site is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of approval
of public agencies stated below. Any conditions of such agencies which have been added or
sign.ificantly revised by the Hearing Examiner are italicized.
Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this
approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to
comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
1. The proposal shall comply with the Regional Business (B-3) zone, as amended, and other
applicable provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code.
2. Condition of approval #4 of the 1975 rezone of the site iri File No. ZE-203-77 is hereby
revased to delete the requirement that a concrete wall be installed along the north property line
of the site and the northerly 75 feet of the west property line, of the same type of fence that exists
ulong the west boundary of the project. The Yemuinder of Condztion #4, and all other conditions
of approval nttached to the 1978 rezone of the site shall contlnue to apply to the subject
property.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-203A-77 Page 6
3. The applicant shall install a 6 foot high sight-obscuring cyclone fence along the north property
line of the site. See locataon of "requared fencing" an site plan uttached to Staff RepoYt, except along
the east property line.
4. The Division of Building and Planiung shall prepare and record with the Spokane County
Auditor a Title Notice noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special
conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as
public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice
should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be
released, in full or in part, by the Spokane County Division of Building Planning. The Title
Notice shall generally provide as follows:
"The parcel of property legally described as [ ] is the subject of a land use action by
the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on December 15, 1999, imposing a variety of special
development conditions. File No. ZE-203A-77 is available for inspection and copying in the
Spokane County Division of Building and Planning."
DATED this 15"' day of December, 1999.
SPOKANE C UNTY HEARING EXAMINER
r . C"
Michael C. Dempsey, WSBA #8235 v
NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL
Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0171, the decision of the Hearing Examiner
on an application for a change of conditions application is final and conclusive unless within
twenty-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing
files a land use petition in superior court pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW. Pursuant to chapter
36.70C RCW, the date of issuance of the Heanng Examiner's decision is three days after it is
mailed.
This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant on December 15, 1999. The date
of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is therefore December 20, 1999, counting to the
next business day when the last day for mailing falls on a weekend or holiday. THE LAST DAY
FOR APPEAL OF THIS DECISION TO SUPERIOR COURT BY LAND USE PETITION IS,
JANUARY 10, 2000.
The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal
period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West
Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be
inspected during normal working hours, listed as Monday - Friday of each week, except
holidays, between the hours of 8:00 am. and 4:30 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record
will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County.
HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-203A-77 Page 7
.
• o . County Public Works,
Transportation . - . - •
1 • • County • - •
Memo
To Tammy Jones •
From Scott Engelh2rd
Date 11 /16/99
Re ZE-203A-77 Change of Condition
Transportation Engineenng has no objection to the proposed elimination of BOCC Condition #4 for the
above referenced zone change The applicant is advised that any proposed improvements to the site
shall comply with the current dramage guidelines and road standards for Spokane County.
,
r -
-o~.-~.~'-"'-"' . . _ . . . . . . , . . . _ . .
's SPOKANE COUN'T'': DTVISION OF BUILDII\ AND PI.ANNING
1026 W. BROEIDWAY • SPOxAvE, wA 99260-0050 (509) 477-3675
SITE Ii~'TORMATION PKOJECT INTORMATION ~
Site Adciress: 11801 E SPRAGYJEAVI_~' Project Number: 99005733 Inv 1 Lssue Date
SPOKANE, WA 99206 Permit Usc GREIDING PERMIT FOR CARLOT EXPANSION
Parccl Number: 45164 0584 Applicant: AT3ARIOTES, NICK
Subdivision• OPPOR'CUNI'I Y(TR 1-1421NC 143- Phone: (509) 922-8231
Z.anmg: B-3 Regional Business Address• 11813 E BROAllWAY AVE
Oivncr• A]3AR.IOTE- S, NICK SPOKANE, WA 99206
Address: 11813 E BROADVVAY AVF Contact: ABARi07'LS, NICK Phone: (509) 922-8231
SPOKANE, WA 99206 11813 E BROADW
Inspector SR INSPE-C l OR Sl'OKANE, WA 992
Watcr Dist. Setbacks - Front: Left: Right: Rear•
~ PExMiT(s) ~
Gr«dinz Perfnit Contractor OWNER Licensc OWNER
GRADRNG & NO\ NON 0 PERMIT FEE S27 QO
, PAVEMENT REVIEW FEE $15 00
Total Value: $SUO UO Total Pennit Fce: $42 00
PA'Y~IF~'T SLJ~LNLARY ~'~~e t ot t NOTES
~
P'ER1vIt"1' ~ By LA.RSON JUritv
~
Tran Datc Receipt # PaN,ment Amt
6/29/99 5314 $42 00
Total Fccs AmountPaid AmountOwinp,
$42 00 $42 00 $0 00 1~
~
? o,..
~ ~
i
t ' -
~
i
h
n
0
s
S
A
1
~ • • •
• y
Projcct Number• 99005733 Inv. Application Date. 6/25/99 Pagc 1 of 2
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
Penalties will be assessed for commencing work without a permit
Proiect Informahon:
' ~ L~1~\N\\t~L~~\it.\\\ Kti~`1\\V\~~«ri1V~ti« n-.N\N\tt\1Lti4\M ~~~~NM1~ti~ ti\V~~~~~ ~\K\KN\L\\~\~NNt\,~ \1 \K~Kt~\\l\~5M1 Vii~x~1Y.~~\ti 11 NNt~\ \\tti ~N\«tt\ ~L11\\t~~St\l ~\~\~'.\~~\M`\~t~~\~ ti Y1iL 4
Pernut Use• GRADING PERNIIT FOR CARLOT EXPANSTON Contact: ABARIOTES, NICK
Address: 11813 E BROADWAY AVE
Setbacks: Front Left Right. Rear: C- S- Z SPOKANE, WA 99206
Phone: (509) 922-8231
.
ite In ormahon:
<c4*%" :,X ..fttiti<. .ti...,.t„
Plat Key- 001852 Name: OPPORTUNTTY(TR1-142INC.143- District: S
Parcel Number: 45164.0584
SlteAddress- 11801 E SPRAGUE AVE Owner: Name: ABARIOTES,1vICK
SPOKANE, WA 99206 Address: 11813 E BROADWAY AVE
Location-. SPO SPOKANE, WA 99206
Zoning B-3 Regional Business
Water Distnct Hold. ❑
Area 0 Sq Ft Width: 66 Depth: 150 Right Of Way (ft): 0
Nbr of Btdgs 0 Nbr of Dwellings• 0
Revierv Information: . m{: , ,•;;~~~~~-,.~:k~~ ~x..; . k<<,.,. .,~r~~>::_~ti L~~~ . ,,;:ti.;...,... ~._.,~~~h~;;~ »
Deuartment Review
BUILDING Review Coordinator
Commcnts•
BULLDING I,anduse Review
Cominents: 7'n =~4
T~~ ~L ~~.z~ ~ -7 v' 6 ~ m
'5;N~te
ENGINEER mrainage Rev~ew
Com.ments. EI~.'/? r'C✓' j7~
70~
UTILITIES Utiiities se~ver
( ) 7'0 tS Sc:.X_.r
Comments: / W4,
v-
Permits: %2 .......;+{.2.
~
June 28, 1999
To whom it may concern
We would like to have the option of removing the existing fence on the west side of
the property (11801 E Sprague, Spokane, WA) due to the fact it has been
destroyed over the years, by time and conditions We are proposing through a
change of conditions that a cyclone fence with decorative slats be placed along the
north property line to block out any light that shines through to the north residents
We own the fence that is in question
DO NOT
DIESTROY
~
lIZ4 tk
Landlord
. • • '
June 28, 1999
DO NOT
To whom it may concern Y
1F"STRQY
In regards to change of condition on No 78-912 ZE - 203-77 -(Item #4), concrete
wall be built to cross the north property line, continuing the same type of fence that
is already there, which is agreeable to the property owners and the 75 feet down
the east side from the northeast corner of the property
Due to the recent development of B.J. Auto leasing the property due west of B J
Auto ( 11801 E Sprague, Spokane, WA the request of putting a fence 75 feet
down the northeast side of 11801 E. Sprague property would be an encumbrance
to the business owners that are trying to utilize the property We would like the
option of postponing the installation of a fence at this time until the tenant's change
at the end of the current ten-year lease
Tenant
. /
Landlord
f w
~ • w
June 28, 1999
To Whom It May Concern DO NOT
T;?Oy
In regards to change of condition on No 78-912 ZE-203-77 -(Item #4) - concrete
wall be built to cross the north property line continuing the same type of fence that
is already there, which is agreeable to the property owners and 75 feet down the
east side from the northeast corner of the property
The current fence is made of cement block that doesn't have the durability or the
aesthetic value of better products made today
We as tenants do not wish to use this type of cement block fence because it does
not provide the security that a cyclone fence does We recently had a 27-foot boat
stolen from our business, and feel that had we had the proper fencing, we would
not have had this problem
We as landlords do not wish to use this type of fencing due to the fact the children
climbing on and abusing this fragile type of fence have destroyed it We feei that a
cyclone fence with decorative slats would be a much better product, which aiso
does a better job of keeping the car lights from the residents on the north side of
the property, which was the intent of this condition (Item #4 - above) in 1978
Sincerely,
~
Tenant
. /
Landlord
p ♦
ZE-203-77 (contd.)
5) Sfnce coor+dfnation with other governmental agencfes is not requfred, that
a Final Declaration of rTon-Significance be signed by the Board of bounty
Commissioners.
6} Improvements shall be fn substantial conformance with the plot plan on
file with this application.
7) That the provfsYOns of SEPA's Votice Qf Actton pursuant to 43.21c.080
R.C.W. and the Board of County CommissioZers' Resolution #77-1392 be
accomplfshed by the project applicant wi.thin thfrty (30) days of
formal action by the Board of County Commfssioners, as instructed by
the Planning Llepartment staff.
8) That if formal adoption of this change is not aCcomplished within one
year of the Planning Commission's action, this application will be
vofd.
PASS ED BY T HE BOARD THIS e/2 DAY OF 1978.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
OF SPOKANE COUNTY, VITASHINGTON
HA RY M. LARN
RAY W. CHR(STCNSEN
JERRY C. KOPET
ATTEST:
VERN : W. QH D
the Boa d
PDepu
By:
ty
y
I hereby certify tha t I have pos ted th
above changes and revisions on the
Zoning Map in the Building Codes
Department, and do further certify that
the zone classiffcatfon change is the
same as described above and shown
on the attached map.
s SIGNED : )0/10~. 7~ rn.t~t
DATED: Z,~Io
-2-
~
~
DETERMINATION OF
NONSIGNIFICANCE - "DNS"
WAC 197-11-970 and Section 11.10.230(3)
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE
FILE NUMBER: ZE-203A-77
DESCRI[PTION OF PROPOSAL: Change of Conditions to an existing Regional Business (B-3)
zone to delete a condition of approval requiring the construction of a block wall fence along
portions of the property line and to replace with a sight obscuring cyclone fence
APPLICANT/OWNER: Nick Abariotes, 11813 E. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99206, 509/922-
8231
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: Generally located N/adj to Sprague Ave and approx 1000 ft E of
Bowdish Rd in the SE '/4 of S16, T25 N, R 44 EWM, Spokane County, WA.
LEAD AGENCY: SPOK:ANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING
DETERMINATION: The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. This decision was made after review of a completed
environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available
to the public on request.
~
This DNS is issued under WAC 197-11-340(2); the lead agency wi Il not act on this proposal for at least
15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this DNS must be submitted no later
than 4:00 p.m., December 6, 1999 if they are intended to alter the DNS. All comments should be
sent to tlie contact person listed below.
RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: By: Tammy Jones Title: Associate Planner
Spokane County Division of Building & Planning
1026 W. Broadway Ave.
„ Spokane, WA 99260-0050 (509) 477-3675
DATE ISSUED: - lCi -CiCi , 1999 SIGNATURE:
COMMENTS REGARDING IIWIRONMENTAL CONCERNS ARE V►ELCOME AT 'II-IE HEARING.
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the SPOKANE
COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING & PLANNING, lst Floor, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA
99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the decision to approve or
disapprove the project. This appeal must be written and the appellant should be prepared to make
specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building and Planning to assist you with the
specifics for a SEPA appeal.
This DNS was mailed to:
1. WA State Department of Ecology (Olympia) 2. Spokane County Division of Engineenng, Transportation Engineering; Pat Harper
3. Spokane County Division of Engineering, Development Services; Bill Hemmings
4. Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
5. Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
6. Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
7. Fire Frotection District No. 1
8 Modern Electric
S P O K A N1F- t ( r C O U N"I' Y
. BUILDING AND PLANMNG A DMSIOtv OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPAxTMEN1'
James L Manson, C.B.O, Director Gary Oberg, Director
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper, c/o Sandy Kimball
Development Engineering Services; BiI1 Hemmings
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane County Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Spokane Regional Health District; Steve Holderby
Spokane Coimty Division of Long Range Planning, John Mercer
Fire District No. 1
Modern Electric Water Co
FROM: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
DATE: November 12, 1999
SUBJECT: Review and comments for the hearing of December 8, 1999 at 9:00 a.m.
FILE # ZE-203A-77
DESCRIPTION: Change of conditions to an existing Regional Business (B-3) zone
to delete a condition of approval requiring the construction of a block wall fence along
portions of the property line and to replace with a sight obscuring cyclone fence.
STR: 16-25-44
APPLICANT: Nick Abariotes, 11813 E. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99206, 509/922-8231
Note that the application and maps were previously circulated to your agency.
Please review and return any comments to me by November 26, 1999.
Attachments• Notice of Public Hearing
1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0050
PHOIVE. (509) 477-3675 9 FAX: (509) 477-4703 9 TDD. (509) 477-7133
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
TO: All interested persons, and owners/taxpayers within 400 feet
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON
THE LAND USE APPLICATION LISTED BELOW, AS FOLLOWS:
Application: File No. ZE-203A-77; Change of Conditions to an existing Regional Business (B-3) zone
to delete a condition of approval requiring the construction of a block wall fence along portions of the
property line and to replace with a sight obscuring cyclone fence.
Hearing Date and Time: December 8, 1999 @ 9.00 a.m.
Place: Commissioners Assembly Room, Lower Level, Spokane County Public Works Building, 1026
West Broadway, Spokane, Washington.
Owner/Applicant: Nick Abariotes, 11813 E Broadway, Spokane, WA 99206
Address and Location: Generally located north of and adjacent to Sprague Avenue and
approximately 1000 feet east of Bowdish Road in the SE %4 of Section 16, Township 25 North, Range
44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington
Comprehensive Plan: Major Commercial
Zoning Designation: Regional Business (B-3)
Environmental Determination: A Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS) was issued by the County
Division of Building and Planning, as the lead agency on November 19, 1999. The comment period
ends December 6, 1998
Deadline for submitting SEPA Appeal: [note- only applies to administrative appeals to the Hearing
Examiner, not to initial applications such as rezones or preliminary plats].
Related Permits: nla
Division of Building & Planning Staff: Tammy Jones, (509) 477-3675
HEARING EXAMINER PROCEDURES
Hearing Process and Appeals: The hearing will be conducted under the rules of procedure adopted
in Spokane County Resolution No 96-0294 All interested persons may testify at the public hearing,
and may submit written comments and documents before or at the hearing. The Hearing Examiner
may limit the time given to speakers. A speaker representing each side of the issue is encouraged.
Any appeal of the Hearing Examiner's decision will be based on the record established before the
Hearing Examiner, pursuant to County Resolution Nos. 96-0171. Environmental appeals will follow the
same procedura) route as the underlying action All hearings will be conducted in facilities which are
accessible to persons with physical disabilities.
Inspection of File, Copies of Documents: A Staff Report will generally be available for inspection
seven days before the hearing. The Staff Report and application file may be inspected at the Spokane
County Division of Building & Planning, 1 S' Floor Permit Center, Public Works Building, 1026 W.
Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, between 8 am and 4 pm, weekdays, M-F, except holidays. Copies of
documents will be made available for the cost of reproduction. If you have any questions or special
needs, please call the Division at (509) 477-3675. Send written comments to the Spokane County
Division of Building & Planning, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260, Attn: Tammy Jones, ZE-
203A-77. Motions must be made in writing and submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, 3rd
Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 W. Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260-0245.
FILE NO.ZE-203A-77
DECLARATION OF MAILING
I, TERRI MILLSPAUGH, under penalty of perjury of the laws of the State of
Washington, do hereby declare:
I am a citizen of the United States of America and over the age of 18 years.
On the 30" day of September, 1999, I caused to be deposited in the United States mail at
Spokane, Washington, with correct United States postage affixed, a true and correct copy of
NOTICE OF APPLICATION, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers as shown on the Spokane
' County Assessor's records as of September 30, 1999, who have been found to own or pay taxes
on property adjacent to the applicant's/agent's owned, controlled or under-option property, and
additionally parcels adjacent to any private access easement road. The notices were addressed to
those individuals and sent to those addresses indicated on the attached list, incorporated herein
by reference. i,/4C&r, Dated at SPokane, Washington, this day o 1999.
~
~
~ v~~♦O , .I.1
TERRI MILLSPAU v ~
HD-DECI.ARATION OF MLG MSTR
TECHNICALLY COMPLETE STATUS
(DETERMINATION OF COMPLETENESS)
SPOKANE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
As per the Administrative Rules to implement ESHB 1724
Spokane County Board of Commissioners Resolution No. 96-0293, as amended
FILE NUMBER: ZE-203A-77
PERMIT APPLICATION DESCRIPTION: Change of conditions to an existing
Regional Business (B-3) zone to delete a condition of approval requiring the
construction of a block wall fence along portions of the property line and to replace
¢ with a sight obscuring cyclone fence.
APPLICATION TYPE: TYPE III
APPLICANT: Nick Abariotes 1
ADDRESS: 11813 E. Broadway Ave., Spokane, WA 99206
PHONE: (509) 922-8231
DATE OF SUBMISSION OF APPLICATION INFORMATION: September 9, 1999
DATE OF ISSUANCE OF COUNTER COMPLETE STATIJS: September 9, 1999
YOUR APPLICATION IS:
Teclinically complete.
The required components of an application are present and are judged by the review
authority to be sufficiently professionally and technically accurate to allow the
processing of the application. All fees have been paid. This is your
Determination of Completeness. Since your application is judged technically
complete, following is a preliminary determination of consistency:
(a) Type of land use. The proposal consists of a change of conditions to an
existing Regional Business (B-3) zone.
(b) Level of development: The existing use of the property is commercial and no
further development is proposed.
(c) Infrastructure: Necessary public services have sufficient and available
capacity to serve the subject property.
(d) Character of development.
(i) Numerical or other quantifiable performance standards: NA
(ii) Promotes and does not substantrally conflict with narrative standards:
The proposed change of conditions is generally consistent with the Major
Commercial category of the Comprehensive Plan.
(iii) Includes preparation, completion and upproval of required studies,
plans or determinations: No additional information required.
(iv) Methods of determining compliance to ensure thut mitigation measures
will be accomplished: The proposal includes methods to determine
compliance to assure that mitigation will be accomplished.
REVIEW AUTHORITY: Spokane County Public Works Department
Division of Building and Planning (MS-P)
- 1026 West Broadway Avenue
Spokane, WA 99260
Phone: (509) 477-3675 Faac: (509) 477-2243
Division Contact: Tammy Jones, Associate Planner
Date Issued: 1`~ ~ Signature:
9 9wh
T
S P O K A N E ~ C O L7 N T Y
A-
BUILDING AND PLANNING A DMSION OF THE PUBLIC WOItKS DEPARTMENT
james L Manson, C B O, Director Gary Oberg, Duector
MEMORANDUM
TO: Spokane County Division of Engineering; Pat Harper, c/o Sandy Kimball
Spokane County Division of Utilities; Jim Red
Spokane Regional Health District, Steve Holderby
Stormwater Utility; Brenda Sims
Development Engineermg Services, Bill Hemmings
Fire District No 1
Modern Electric
FROM: Louis Webster, AICP, Associate Planner
v
DATE: September 16, 1999
RE: ZE-203A-77; Change of Conditions
Attached is a copy of the application for a site plan review and change of conditions submitted by Nick Abariotes.
The applicant is requesting a change of conditions to eliminate the Board of County Commissioners requirement
that he build a concrete wall across the north property line.
Please review this application package for completeness to ensure those items listed in your signature block on the
application contains tlie mformation necessary to qualify as "Technically Complete "
In addition, please provide your written comments and recommended conditions within ten (10) working days to me
by September 28, 1999.
If you have any questions regarding this file, you may contact me at 477-3675
tm
Enclosures
1026 W. BROADWAY • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260-0050
PHOIVE: (509) 477-3675 • FAX• (509) 477-4703 • TDD. (509) 477-7133
~ . ,
~ ~ .
C H'-- E C~~~:~=
SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL OR,DINANCE
SECTION 1 1.10.23011-
SEPA ENVIROiVMENTAL CHECKIIST
WAC 197-11-960
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Section 11.10.230(1)
PURPOSE OF CHECKLIST
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43 21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies
to consider the environmental impaccs of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental
impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable significant adverse impacts on
the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you
and the agency identify impact from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal,
if it can be done) and to help the agency dccide whether an EIS is required.
IIVSTR UCTIOIVS FOR APPLICAIVTS
This environmental checl:.list asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal.
Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environ.mental impacts or your
proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most
precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most
cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans
without the need to hire cxperts. If you really do not know che answer, or if a quesTion does not
apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply". Complete answei-s to the questians
now may avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark
designations. Answer these question if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agenctes can
assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period
of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that wi11 help describe your
proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to
explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determininc, if there may
be significant adverse impact.
USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NON-PROTECT PROPOSA LS:
Complete this checklist for non-project proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not
apply." I~i 1 ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEIMENTr1L SHEET FOR NON-PROJECT AC'I'IONS (part D).
For non-project actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and
"property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area
respectively.
A. BACKGROUN FILE/PROJEC1 'Y'
D No
Spokane Environmental Ordinznce Checklist Page 2 of 21
f. Name of prapased projece, if app]icable.
- N
. 411
2 Iw1ame of applicant:
- A-~-e
~ ~ .
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person;
4~~
~
~ 512 ---o C, .
- -
~~R;Z,-2 /
4. Date checklist prepared:
-7
5 Agency requestin(y checkl2st. 1 p
~
~
Vaxa~ t~
6 Proposed tirruno, or schedule (including piYasing, if applicable):
A. BACKGRpLrNI7 (coatlnued):
Spokane Environmental OrdFnance Che:klist Page 3 oF? 1
7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
AIO
b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If ycs, explain.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly
related to this proposal.
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly
affecting the property covered by your proposaP If yes, explain.
/V/0
10 List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
No v~ e
A. BACKGROLND (conunued):
Spokane Envlronmental Ordinance Checklist Page 4 of 21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEVIENTS (Continued):
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project
construction for eYamp~Ie, asphalt or buildings}? '
►~D l~' ~;,~G~
~
I
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control e. osion, or other impacts to the eanh, if any: .
2. AIR
a. What rype of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, '
automobile, odors, industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the projecc
is comileteci? If any, generally describe and give appro:cimate quantities, if known.
~ovt~
~
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal?
If so, generally describe.
C. Propo e m
c easures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: ~
~
~
~
~
G
~
~
Spokane Environmental Ordin3nce Checklist Page 7 oF? I
MMI
B. EiNVIRONMENTt1L ELEMENTS (Continued): "
3. WarER
a. Surface:
1 Is there an d on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (includin
) y surface ~vater bo y g
year-round and seasonal strearris, saltwater, lakes, ponds, aretlands)? If yes, describe
e nunes. If appropriacestate what stream or river ic flows
rovid
into.
rype v
~
2) W111 the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the
describe waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
~p
i
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed
from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected.
Indicate t~source of fill material.
~
Cr
~
~
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give a general ;
descrip ' n, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
A A/W
C
I
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site
plan.
~
~
~
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Pa~e S or 21
/
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEiti1ENI'S (Continued):
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so,
describe/% rype of waste and anticipated ~folume of discharge.
~
.
b Ground:
1) Will groundwater be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? ,
Give ge eral description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
,
~
.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or
►
other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, ,
the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the
number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve.
, .
3) Describe any systerns, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, ~
installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (including
systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). ;
Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the ~
system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which ~
may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting i
activities).,~~ ~
I
I
i
i
ISpokane Environmental Or-dinance Checkllst Page 9 of 21
B. B. EWIRONMENTAL ELEVIENTS (Continued):
~
4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above- ;
ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will '
I
be stored?
~
~
~
~
~
~
►
~
5) What protective measures will be taken to ensure Lhat leaks or spills of any chemicals
stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to groundwater (this includes
measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 36(2) and 36(3)? ;
s -
ti
u
' h
~
~
c. Water Runoff (including storm water)
I'
p
1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and mechod of collection and '
I
disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Wi11 this ~
water flp into other waters? If so, describe. ~j
AO
1 ~
. r,
~i
~
2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or
le3k R%ill drain to surface or groundwater or to a storm water disposal system
~discharging tq surface or groundwater?
~
~
3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, genErally describe
~
~i
Spokane Enrironmental Ordinance Checklist Pa~e 10 of 21
B. EiNVIRONMENTAL ELEil~1ENTS (Contmued). d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if '
any (if the proposed action lies within the Aciuifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on
explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this s~
checklist),
1/7
4. PL.ANTS
a Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: ~
deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other
evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs
'X' grass
pasture crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage,
other
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, orher
other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be rcmoved or altered? '
A jh~P
,
c. List th~eaj ened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. '
~
u
~
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other
measures to reserve or enh;~jnce ve etation on the site, if any: ~
~ r~ A ~Z' c/C <'a ,c~alC
c ~e ~ ~e~,~s ~a ~ y~
. ~ ;
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checkl,st P30ae 1 1 of 21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEI-IENTS (Continued): ~
5. ANIMALS
a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or '
near the site or are known to be on or near the sitc: ~ J
birds. hawk' heron' eagle' songbirds' ocher
r
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other.
b List any reatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
. l.N •
~
c. Is the site pof a migration route? If so, explain.
~ot .
Ca~
; ,
d. Proposed easures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
~s~
6. ENERGY AND NATURr1L RESOURCES I
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) nrill be used
to meet the completed project's energy needs) Describe whether it wfl1 be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
b. Would your project affect the potenti;il use of solar energy by adjacent properties~
If so, generally describe.
,
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 12 of 21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELE1'YIEs'I'S (Continued):
c. What kinds of energy conscrvation features are included in the plans of this proposal?
List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
,
~
,
7. ENVIRONMEiNT'AL HEALTH
. i
a. Are there a.ny environmental hea.lth hazards, including exposure to toYic chemicals,
risk of fire and e:cplosion, spill, or hazardous wasTe, that could occur as a result of this 'i
proposal? If so, describe. ;
/vo
1) Describe sp~eci~ emergency services that might be required.
/ V~ v1`Q
. ~
2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental '
health hazards, if any:
~n
~
i
~i
b. Noise ~
h
1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your pro)ect (for e:cample• ~
traffic, equipment, operation, other)? r ~
/1 ~i~ v'v►~«. ~ f~ ~'1 r -3 C /1'A<
16 ~ •
,
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or a.ssociated with the project
on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation,
~
other)? Indicate w at hours noise ~yould come from the site. ~ N
~
hc~v~~ v~ ~tz s r s v~ s~~vc~~ c) ~ i
- t ,
~k
IV
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Pa~e 13 of 2l
B. EiNVIRONMEt~J'1"AL ELEMENTS (Cuntinued)• 171
3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any• ~J
8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE
a. ~.Ylhat is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? e
1 1 A%l%~%\
~
V f~GI'Ur1N_ ~
b. Has the ite been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
AJ c. Describe any structures on the site. ,
l - TCo ~ ~G k-) e i i C-1 ri
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which?
~
iA'
~
~
e. Whzt is the current zoning classification of the site? 13A3
;
~
i
Y
k
4
0
d
Spokane Environmental OrcLinance Checkllst Pa~e 1-~ of 21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEiY1ENTS (Connnucd):
f. What is the current Comprehensive Plan designacion of the site) LAI
- - ,
V ~
L"6ll./A 1 / l/ • CAJIAWJ/(J`L
U
g If applicable, what is the currcnt shoreline master program designation of the site)
. . .
h Has any pan of the site been classified as an "environnientally sensitive" area? ,
If so, specify. ~
7y1 'e '
Jo I
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed proJect?
44 joUp 6''(~ V . 'ti1
~
~ Approximately how many people would the completed pro)ect displace?
~
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement imp3ccs, if any• ~
I
~
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with eYisting and projected
land uses and plans, if any. ~
` I ~ .
ClCJ~~
4-/. I ~
~I
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 15 of 21
B. EiNVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
9. HOUSING ~
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any) Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
'
b ApproYimately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high,
middle, or low-income housing.
/V/_1 '
,
I~
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any•
~
~
I
10. AESTHETICS '
. ~
u
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; ,
what is the principa.l exterior building material(s)~proposed?
E.~c.. ( s~c~'r ;t 57
~J
b What views in the immediate vicinity would be alcered or obstructed?
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any.
,
-
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checkllst Page 16 of 21
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued):
11. LIGHT AND GLARE
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would ic
mainly occur? _
A
} c3 'ac'k-
~z~ ,
v la~ to v-~
~
~
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with
views?
r"X
~
c. Whaz exdsting off-site sources of light or glare may affecc your proposal? !
~
d ProPosed measures to reduce or concrol light and glare impacts, if any• I
C;rf
~~c f G
~t,~6j' Pa~P~/' v`G4 CJPG~,~~ ~ v c c F/ rs 1l0 w
~
12. RECRE.ATI0N
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity) '
~UbrA c0
b
r
~
ti
b. Wo ld the proposed project displace any eYisting recreational uses? If so, describe. '
~
~
h
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 17 of 21
B. ENVIRONiN1ENTAL ELEMENTS (Conhnucd). ~
c. Proposed mcasures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation ~
opportunities to oe provided by the project or applicant, if any:
13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local
preservation registers, known to be on or nex-t to the site? If so, generally describe.
~n
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific
or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site.
F'
c. Pro osed measures to reduce or control impaccs, if any: .
[~ii f ~i~tPl ~/h
14. TRANSPORTATION
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site and describe proposed access ~
to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. u
0- ~ rP ~ ~ . C'~ ~ C" ~ SSl~ ~"o c/e ~
~
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approlimate distance
i
to the nearest transit stop?
~
i
~
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 13 of 21
B. EivVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (Continued): n/
c. How man arkin a w ld the com letcd ro ect have? How man w v-~
y p g sp ces ou p p) y ould the
project eliminate?
,'Un~ p
d Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads
or streets, not including driveways~ If so, generally describe (indicate whether public
or private).
,/l!Q
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity oo water, rail, or air
transportation? If so, generally describe. ~
_ I
h
f. How many vehicular tnps per day would be generared by the completed project? ~
If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur. !
f ~ v(~t, n w~n - ~ - ,
~
~Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impaccs, if any: )"Pr
15. PUBLIC SERVICES
a. Would the project result in an incre3sed need for public services (for example: ~
fire ~protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
N
~
R
~
,
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checkllst Page 19 of 21
B. EYVIRONMENTAL ELEiN1ENTS (Continued):
t
Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacu on public services, if any. `
,
~
~ . ,
a OZ-, ~
~
16. UTILITIES
a Circle utilitie.ssurrently available at the site: ectriciE nural,g1, ~at@r,)fefuse_)
- I
6ervice elepp, ~tary sewer septic system, ot er. f '
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the pro)ect, the uuliry providing the '
service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immed.iate viciniry which might be needed.
✓ ;
C. SIGNATZTRE I~
I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are mzde truthfully and to the best of
my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure
on my part, the aaencv may withdraw any determination of non-significance that it might issue in reliance upon th.is
checklist. `
D~;,~te: Iq MY
-
Proponent: lC~ .
A A
. `~C
(Please type or print) (Signature)
Address: City, State, Zip: &731~
Phone: 9 ~2
Person completina the form: l/~'cjk Tv >~14~ Date•
Phone
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 20 of 21
FOR STAFF USE C7NLY
Staff Member s Reviewing Checklist:
U
U
Based on th' staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff.
A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a
determination of nonsignificance (DNS)
B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current
proposal and recommends a mitigated determinacion of nonsignificance with conditions (vIDNS)
C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends
a determination of significance (DS).
REFER TO FEE SCHEDULE FOR FILING FEE
Spokane Environmental Ordinance Checklist Page 21 of 21
SPOKANE COU-NTY PLANNING
~
. c ~
. ~
CHANGE OF CONDITIONS :F0R A PR-Li VIOUSLY APPROVLi D ZONE CHA.NGE
~%a~~ ~
G
Datc. Application No.
Name Of Applicant/Represeniative: /Vf C/~ A)~~ 14 R-:7-6
/i!= S
Mailing Address:
C i ty : ~6 I(-,q l/1 `F S tate: ZL'4'p1/ g ~`~Q
v Zip• • co
PllOIlE• (~2 (Work) ~CL vi -e . (IIome)
Eaisting Zone Classification: r 3
Date Existing Zone Classification Establish.ed:
Legal De scriptionof Property: ~ ;~yt a70 B/~j/~
~ C~16 e&F ~ a?C ~:Z~
rLi1L1_cF ~-'Lv 7e
r.~~
' /~c~ ~l~Sc~ Yi'ie.~
Gt S v~ /G 3.3f~es~ orG~~ 65~i- P~' ~C~' 7~ g 8 ~ ~c 5c~G. ~ ~a~~, 81= ~ ~Y~~
SecL10I1 1(42 Townshi o~`J~ Ran
p ge w
Source of Legal: ('~oc, e -~Z 77
~ -
Parcel No.:
oz ~v~'~.-f- 2 w d ~-e
~~a' l ~ e c Lcee ~ ?4 S°"-~►~.,~ ~e .~'b ~ rfl~ ~C~
e ,/~1U v~ /~ot S~tf~~~1.
, E Y
PROPOSED CHANGr OF CONDITIONS
IZeCereilce spccific "Coildition(s)" of original approval, (Cite t11e applicable condition fi•om
the Fiildings and Order of the Hearing Examiner Committee's public hearing).
(JM rM 14 (D
(9 r-4\ 66 !/Li/I'I1/L~ c 4Ai' wLwt° nl Awe
~ r -
a~ c.v s~l 'r v v~ d C'; 'r Wo C yh c~
,j>e
(yn ~r f/1M'' ~ ~ 7~~► ~ ,f'~vr~ - v
I
G1Ve dCta1ICd e\nla11c1t1021 Or I'eqt1ESt fOY CIlaI1gC lIl Stc1tLIS Of tIIC p10pOSal.
za~,ejoP~ l ~b °-f-~t-e n bnp- 6~
~
7/A C c.1 ~Gt
Lv t C,t~e ~fn ~hl,~
7A `
C ~C~tr ~ r '~'ee (er~~i~ t0rre Se~ ~ve ~~C e
~ vr ' C~~F~c~
Q, 0- YOS S -e t~'f-k ~C
y~~ v- CY 4'1)Qt 41111 rG~ i'~~ If cie"vclopinen~of t~he s~te e~anged su~5tantia~ ll"y Uy I request, or ttle properly has
boundaries different than originally proposed, a tevisEd developinent plan musi be submittecia kic/
Yr
. ~ .~j f
Signature of Applicant or Agent Acldress if different tha.n Applicant ~P11- ey'1<e-.S
Rcv. 8/93; sam
~1 ,
0 -P) C .s~
r
s ~ ~
SPOKANE COUNTY
" DIVISION OF BUiLDiNG AND PLANNING
PRE-CONFERENCE FORM
PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE FOR:
❑ PLAT ❑ SHORT PLAT ❑ BINDING S1TE PLAN
❑ TEMPORARY USE ❑ VARIANCE ❑ CONDiTIONAL USE
❑ ZONE CNANGE VCHANGE OF CONDITIONS
❑ OTHER 0jPR0J6c_CT1NF0RMAT10N - _ : _ - - _ ; _ - -
Applicant
Parcel number(s)-
,
Project location/address Uwm1
- ~ r
A)
. .
General project description: (91 14n IM{A Q/)✓
.
. ~
Type of Access: Comp. Plan category
Sewage Disposal Method: Existing Zone:
Proposed zone (if rezone) Fire District.
~ Schoot District: ,~l
Proposed land use
e
Proposed # of lots (for plats)- Arterial Road Plan.
Site size. Water District. U
Neighborhood Association: ❑ Moran Praine ❑ Little Spokane River
❑ Gleneden ❑ Other
0 Five-Mile
Pre-conference form kjs 8/11/97
Page 1 of 3
' SPOKANE COUNTY `
• ► ~
" DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING
I Ai6f PRE-CONFERENCE FORM
SITE /NFORMA TlON, '
PSSA inside outside C) ASA inside outside ❑
IUGA inside ~ outside ❑
Joint Planning Area? Yes 0 No 5~ If yes, whic~~h/~ ity/town?
Environmental or cultural resources? Yes No ~d if yes, which type?
Designated shoreline area? Yes 0 o~ If Yes, which designation?
~
Affected by floodplain? Yes ❑ No
Within 1000' notification boundary of designated Natural Resource Lands? Yes No
-f CR/TICALAREAS
1. Wetlands. Yes 0 No
❑ Category 1 (200 foot minimum buffer)
❑ Category 2(150 foot minimum buffer)
0 Category 3(75 foot minimum buffer)
0 Category 4(25 foot minimum buffer)
❑ Unknown
Comments: ~
II. Fish and Wildlife Habitat: Yes• O No b~
Priority Habitat Species-
Water bodies? Yes 0 No 0
0 Type I(250 foot minimum buffer area)
❑ Type 2(100 foot minimum buffer area)
Cl Type 3(100 foot minimum bufifer area)
❑ Type 4(75 foot minimum buffer area)
Cl Type 5(25 foot minimum bufier area)*
' No buffenng requirement for Type 5 streams when there is no connection to Type 1, 2, 3, or 4 streams
Comments:
III. Geologically Hazardous Areas: Yes ❑ No .
If yes, indicate type of hazard(s)
❑ A slope of 30% or greater
❑ Erodible soils
❑ Hydraulic factors (i.e. existing on-site surface and groundwater)
❑ Prone to landsliding
Cl Area of uncompacted fill
❑ Unstable areas due fo rapid stream or stream bank erosion
Comments
- PRE-CONFERENCE SUMMARY
Planning Issues (landscaping, buffer areas, land use compatibility, traffic)
00A, a41L
*a--" C~(
GU
Pre-conference i'orm k)s 8/11 /97
Page 2 of 3
r
~ -
- ~ ~ SPOKANE COUNTY
DIVISION OF BUILDlNG AND PLANNING
"
-st C767i-F PRE-CONFERENCE FORM
-6
Special project requirements (habitat management plan, shoreline permit)
, .
.
General comments
~
"==_AGENC/ES-TO CONTACT_- _ -
. You are encouraged to contact the foilowing departmentslagencies to obtain information
and requirements regarding your proposai.
Spokane County Public Works
C) Division of Building and Planning 456-3675
C! Division of Utilities 456-3604
Sewer/Water Resources
Storm Water
❑ Division of Engineering 456-3600
Drainage
Transportation
Division of Long Range Planning 456-2294
❑ Spokane Regional Heaith District 324-1560
Cl Spokane County Parks 456-4730
❑ Department of Transportation 324-6000
❑ Department of Ecology 456-2926
❑ Department of Fish and Wildlife 456-4082
❑ Fire District No.
❑ Water District No.
❑ Other Agencies:
T
Date. Staff Planner
i'l I
Receipt Amount Paid ►
~
Pre-conference form kjs 8/1 i/97
Page 3 of 3
iow
~
.
SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF 6UILDING AND PLANNING
SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST `r`°04~
•
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
TNE (TcMS CHECKED BELOW MUST BE SUBMITTEO WITH YOUR APPLICATION
❑ PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE
~ SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
U APPLICATION FORM
Submit completed application on the attached form~with all signature blocks completed.
ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAPS N
Subm' 2 opies of current County Assessor maps showing the subJect property outlined
in red d adjacent property owned or under option to the owner or sponsor (indicate
adjacent property with a red dashed line). Adiacent includes property located across
roads and rivers, etc.
Assessor maps are available at the County Assessor's Office and must be current (less
than 30 days old) at the time of submittal Platted (1 "=200') and range (1 "=400') parcel
maps must be obtained, as you may need both sets, depending an your property location
The maps are used for legal notification of property owners within 400 feet of the
boundary of the total contiguous ownership and/or controlled property (shown in red)
Label and show in red line the 400 foot boundary from the total contiguous ownership
r-~ s Yi, pLr I ZONING SECTION MAP
Submit 1 copy of the official zoning map with the boundary of the proposed zone
change(s) indicated in red, with the proposed zoning labeled on the property. The zoning
boundary shal Copies of official zoning maps
are obtainable from the County Division of Building and Planning (The written legal
co - description(s) on the application form and the zoning boundary(s) shown on the map shall
coincide, verified by the surveyor's stamp). Note: The property does not have to be
surveyed at this time. The map stamped by a licensed land surveyor verifies the written
legal description for the proposed zone change is accurately mapped on the zoning map
~j ~~~''"t- - 1
no ENGINEER'S SECTION MAPS
SubmitN&Iurrent copies of the section map(s) showing the subject property outlined in
~ red Engineer section maps are available at the County Engineer's office.
ZONING PLAN AND/OR SI1'E PLAN
Submit 9 lueline copies of the development proposai drawn to scale and 1 zoning
planlsit lan reduction UU/2" x 11" or 11" x 17") indicaiing the following information in a
clear and concise manner- '
a Scale of drawing; north arrow, dimensions of the site boundaries and area in square
' feet or acres, corporation, firm or individual preparing the site plan --with date, and a
A . small vicinity map.
AAA .
e following data in table form on the site plan.
Existing Lone(s) I Nroposed Lone(s) ~ Acres or Sq rt.
-
Building Information
~ .
' hIrcent of Building Coverage (in sq ft )
Building Use(s)
Landscaped P,reas (in sq ft.)
Type of Landscaping
No of Parkmg Spaces Required I3
Percent of Open Space (exclude paved areas)
(in sq. ft.)
SBuilding Setbacks
i
~
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST Page 2 0l' 3
c. Indicate the following-
1. Indicate right of way width and names of streets adjacent to the site
2. Existing buildings and other improvements, indicate which ones are to remain,
which ones are to be removed
3 Proposed buildings and dimensions.
4. Height of all buildings, structures and signs.
5. Access points and driveways.
6. Proposed or existing easements providing access to the site
7. Interior circulation patterns
8. Parking areas and spaces.
9 Building setbacks to property lines, and to center line of adjacent private and
public roads.
10. Type and location of landscaping, fencing, lighting and signage.
)<FPUD PLAN AND NARRATIVE
ubmit a PUD plan and narrative which meets the requirements of Section 14 704 140 of
he Spokane County Zoning Code. The PUD plan shall include building elevation and
location and the narrative shall include a detailed description of the proposed PUD plan
and also a description of how the PUD meets the purpose and intent of Section
_ 14 704 140. See attached PUD Checklist Worksheet
.
U NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
completed environmental checklist is required for all zone changes, planned unit
developments and subdivision requests. Short plats, binding site plans and other land
use applications may require a checklist under SEPA rules unless exempted by WAC 197-
11-800. Note: If previous environmental checklist exists for the property, it may be
adequate to address environmental issues
COLOR SLIDES AND LOCATOR MAP
)tN."SUbmit 7 to 10 slides of the project site and adjacent surrounding property. Number the
slides to coincide with locator map which shows from where and in which direction the
slides were taken.
CRI COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING FEES
ZONE RECLASSIFICATION (Due at application acceptance meeting)
From any zone to the EA or GA zone $
From any zone to the RR-10, SRR-5, SRR-2 and SR-1 zone $
From any zone to the SR-1/2 and UR-3.5 zones $
From any zone to the RS, UR-7, UR-12 and UR-22 zones $
C ,
-Vtrom any zone to the B-1, B-2, and B-3 zones $~o~~,. o~
~From any zone to the I-1, I-2 and I-3 zones $
From any zone to the Mining zone $
From any zone to any zone not listed above $
Environmental Checklist $ k11)• oo
Zero Lot Line $
6
^ ~
Other $ M
, 40-00
~ , _
.
cio
1
I
~ .e.
i
✓
ZONE RECLASSOFICATION CHECKUST Page 3 of 3
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Preliminary PUD $
Change of Conditions
Site plan review with pubiic hearing $
,
TOTAL ~UE AT SUBMITTAL
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL PROCESSING FE~ES'~
The County Engineer, County Regional Hea i i nct and County Di ision of Utilities
typically charge fees in conjunction with your proposal. Please contact these departments
for their current fee schedules for your proposal. (These fees are due at the time the
departments sign your application)
REQUIRED PUBLIC NOTICE (See attached notice requirements)
❑ OTHER EXHIBITS OR APPLICATIONS
lllqg O&W" ovu
Date Planner u v
REZONE SUBMITTAL CHECKUST KJS 4-37