The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-131-78 ~ N~ I~o. No. No. ~10, No. No. , NQ. '12130~O _ REcEIPT FoR cERTIFiEo MA-, REC~IP7 FOR GER7IFI~D MAIL RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT ~OR CE~iTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FQR CER~~~IFIED MAIL p€~~1pr ~p~; G~~TIFIED MAIL R~ REGEIPT FQR CER`TIFI~a I~AIL ~ HO ~NSURAN~E COYER~6E PROYIOED~ }IO INSARANCE C0~►ERAGE PROVI~ED- HQ INSURANCE COVERAGE PROYIOED- NO INSURANCE COYERA6E PROYIDED~ ND IHSURANCE COVE~AI3E,~ROVIDED- h HO INSURANCf COYERAGE PROViE1E►)-- HO II~Sl1RANCE COY~RIlGE PAOYIQED- pa INTERHAi14MAl MAIL il E 11JITIONAI M~III F0~ INTERMATIONAI MAII NOT FOR'IMTERN~ITION11l I~AIL NOT FOR IhTEI~NATIONAI MAII NOT f MOT FOR I T R NOT . NOT FOR I~ITFRNATIG~IAL ~IAII MOT FDR lNTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) ~See Reverse) (See Reverse~ (See Reverse~ (See Revers~~ ° ~ (S~a R~verse) (5ee Reverse) , . SEfVT TO SE~IT Tfl SENT 7p SENT TO _ SEN~ TQ SENT Td S~W~ SEN . - 4 ' r" ~ ' . , ~ %7 . ~ r ~j ' - f`~Lu-tl1 fi'~. ~1 ~,r~'If-/!~_ u~ ~~90~/Iwl~e-~ ~r_ ~ (~(3l~i(~ I~ ~,~,1~~:ct(- L ~f~ (~l,'r~~~~r.t'~l~fi~- IIVS~11LNr.~C,'_ t, , L I r ' 1 . ~ . ~ - ~ ~4 1 ~ t ~ t~ ~L. t) P, i~ f-A STREET AND NO . STREET AND N0. ~iE~T AlVO N~. ST~iEET AN~D YAE`ET AN[~ N0. STREET ANfl Ma. STREET AND NC7. STRI r fr j i~ ~p-~ I~'~'lt~IF-~! i ~'L ~ ~~.`~~=~`frG1~ ' ~,._.1~`1 ~~i t~rl~'t~i~ j-1~ 7 (~.;~:~0~~ (~~L~, ~l ~~.~~(;~~1'~~i4 ~ ' . 1 1 : J } - (Zi- ~r4 r i ~ 4- ~J ~ ~ G' r ~ i ~ r ~\I ~ { . P.O., STATE AND ZPP CADE P.O., STATE AND ZIP G0~ p fl., STATE ANI~ ZIP COOE ~j,~Y P.O., STATE AND ZIP CQDE P.Q., STATE ANCI ZIP CI~[?E ~y p,0.. STATE AND ZIP CO~E p•~ ~ „ a ~rr ~~l ! ~'L ~ iy1'~~i:t ~1'/J{ ~l ! ~-~f ~ ~A rfi ~ ~L-' ~1 ~ 1~ ~p~E~-, / ~7,~,`~{; °i ~';'~f .t'~' "~~ft ~ P.O., STATE ANf7 ZIP CODE I~ f .l y I C y / y G. .l ~''t~ ~..i~ 4 ~~L ~ ~ 4 , --s( _ 1 ( ~ ~.,~Y. ~ \~~r'~ L L ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1 i'f~STAGE ~ POS POSTAGE PQS'~AGE S POSTAGE $ i'(}STAGE $ I$ PQSTAGE ~ ~ _21 '0'k r i~ d ~ POSTAGE ~ i ~ GERTIFIED FEE a GE~TIFIED FEE d CERTI~IED FEE Q CERTIFIED FEE I a CEpfiIF~E~ FEE CE~ITIFIEb FEE Q ~ ~ CEFiTlFIED FEf I +/1 V► ` " W s~~cu~ u~uvERr ¢ w y I PEC ~ ~ SR~GIAL OEII'J~RY Q w W SPECIAL DELIVERY ~ ~ 5pEClAI D~LIYERY 4 W SPECIAL DELIVERY 4 ~ ~pECIAL DELIVfRY Q ~ !SPECIAL fJELEWERY ~ ~ ~ RESTRIGTE~ DELIYERY a ~ RES~RICT~D pEL1VEFIY 4 ~ RESTRICT~C~ DEUYERY ~ RES7RICTE~ DEi.IVEl~Y 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ae I ~ R~STRICLEI7 DELIVERY Q at RESTRICTED DEUYERY I ~ ~ ~ ~ o oc ~ Q ~ RESTFiICTE6] DELIYERY ~ y ~n W w u~ ~ LL'~ W w p~ w y a~+ W S H 4 W i p 1 M H q M A N~ D A T E o e ~ u S H(~ W 1 0 1 4 N O M h M Q ( Y A T E g S N O w T O ~ d Q M N 1 D D A~ ~ a ~ ~ S N O W f 0 W H q M ~ N a U A ~ E W~~ S H 4~ T~0 W H O M A D D l E q S H 4 W i U W H 9 M J I I I U D k( E ~ a c LL. ~ ~ SHOW T(~ W1I0M AlID UAiE ~ Df LIUERED , ~,y " ~ DELCJERED a ~ y, ~ QfU4EBED ~ ; ~ ~ELIlEREA h ~ ~ DEIivERED ~ ? ~[lV[ E ~ _ 3 d~fYEREO ~ F^ ~ 7 y~ G y~ i 1 C y~ p~ O C y p~ ~ d C y~~ V f ~ w W s~ow ro wNOr~. [~rE. ~MO H w r~ w~+ ~r~, u~~ s~aw ro wNO~, o~t~, u~Q ~ H~~+ow ro wHOM, DaTF, AND ~ W~ M r ~ y ~ ~ ~ s H a ~ g s~ o w r a w ~ w E, a~ o ~ v► SH(hW ip WHUM, 6A1~, AN4 r- Ati~RES~ Of UEIdW[RY ~ r ~ ~ ~ ¢ Q r ~ AUDRE~S Af ~EIIVERY kDDHESS Of DEUVERY ~ hUpHESS 4f DEl1YERY r A D 6 R E S S O F O E L I V E R Y ~ ~~~69~E~S Qi DEIiVEFV o~~ w~ ~ n. o= W o.~ m o ~*~SHOW TQ WHDM, DATE. kNp a ~ ~ ADDRESS OF 4fLIYERY ~ o = ~o~ ao~ ~a~ ~,~u~ ~ ~ c~ W SHaW T4 WII01~ kND DATE $HpW TO WH(}hl AND DAk ~ypW Ip WHDM AND ~~1E W SHO'N 10 WH4M ANfl DATE ~~}~qyy ifi WHUM AND Dh~E H F„ ~y SHOW tQ N`NpM ANR ~JATE ~ a' oc pfL14ERED WITN NESiRIC1En Q oWe p{~14ERED WITI4 RESbNICT~i ~ a~c UEi1VERE~ WITH RFS~IIC1EU t 4 aG [IEIIUEFED WITN RESTR9CTED 4 Q ~ ~ J a~ DEI~VERE~ WfiN RESiBICfED 4 ~ Q-{~EL1Vk~Y a d ~ ~ DE~IVERfD W11N RESTRIGTED ~ o p~Y~~Y v~ Z p~ DELl4fRY ~~,y D z DELIYfRY y Q z GEIPrERY ~ o~ n[C!VERY u~i a x ~ oc ~ ~c ~ a z ~ ~ ac z Q c ~ c s}Ei ~ P,fD WtTH RE5TRIC70 ~ CD ~ ^ ~ • ~ C~ ~ SH~1W i 1,~ WND r~ ~ SNOW t0 W11GMM. naTE ~NQ p ~ SA6W ip W410M, DA~E hHD ~ ~ ~1 WNpM, OATE kHD z7 ~ SHpW iU hNH~}MI, DhiE AND y ~ 5H4W TD WHQM, p~1E ,1MD ~ w AUqHE~~ : WI~H a ~ AODHESS 6F kEIIY~RY WIiH ~ Ci AftARE~S Of DEIIVfRY WIPII 4 ~GRtS. EllVERY WI1N ` ~ t IVE~Y WITH 4 C? ~ v' ~ . r V4'1Z2~ 4 Ci A~DRE ERY M~TH ` pe BE~Tu~';`" afIIVERY ~ RESTR!GT fi~~~~f.~Y ICiED E~Y ~SiRI~?i _ i?Y ~ AESf pE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ K~. N'S TOTAt $ N TpT PO F~ $ N TOTAL PO E $ ~~T~ $ r TA T D TQT 70TAL AN~ FE +~,,A $ v~ ~ a~ a T~ ~ - - - " -g 1 i w - ~TQT lY~J P G F_3p F S• $ - ST fl QAT K 0 ARM`~ T ~ ~ AFK T~ ~ 7E ~ r. PQS AR ~ w i~ w PSISTM ~ ~ P()577~ RK fy ~OSTM DA p, ,~f + ~ ~ a c, ,Z ~ x 6I , w PO$ NC OR DA a. Q 0 ~ r, ~ 6'/ syc f ~ ~ , ~ w ~ ~ ~~1lZ r~. y i~' ! f . p 4 0 4 S~.. ~ 'ir t ~ V~ ~ 1~ o jj ~ ~ ~ ~ , o ~ ~ n. ~ - c , ~ ~ ~.c ~ ` ~ ~ ~ l l~~ 1 ~i.. ~ L f ~ , C~ ~ ,n ~ 11U1~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S 0 c~ ~ ,y(j . . Q ~ ~ , , s~y ~y ~ ~ d~ ~ , 3 F ~ D ` 0 .(1 ~l. 0 0 O - Gc, L~, ~ ~ L~, . (J ~e- ~ fr" L Q ~t ~ ` I ~ ~ a r~ - ~ ~ t v ~ a. . ~ ~ s ~k ly T` . ,~,ar+ y ~ y t - ~ ~ ~ - No. . . No. N~, l~o, 1 No. N~ ~o. t ~ Q MAIL RECEIPT FOR CE~TIFIEQ MAIL ~~~~D MAI R ~~RT~FIE RECEIPT F0~ CERTI~I~D MAIL RECEIPT F~R CERTIFI~D MAIL ~ECEIPT FOR CERTIFIEp MAIL FpR CERT ~CEIP'T FO ~C~1QT R NQ IMSURANCE COYERAGE PROYIDED- RE RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL ; ~ E PROVI4EU~ E GOYEiI~fi'E PROV~DE~' NO IMSURANCE COYERAGE PROYiDEO- MO INSURANCE GOYERA6E PROViDED- NO IMSURAMG~ COYERA6E PRGVIDED- $p~,NCE COV~tU►G N0 IMSURAK~ t M~111 . NDT FQR INTERNATIONAI hdAll N01N ~,~~T~pK~y~ ~~~L NOT FOR INTERN~TIDMAL MAII NOT FOR INIERNIITIONAI MIIIL N4T FOR INTERHAT1~NAl MAII E NOT fOR IMTEANATION MO IMSURAHCE CflVERAGE PROYIDEQ- NOT FOR INtERNIlTIL1NAl MAII NOT fOR 1MT ~ (See Reverse) e ~~~~Se) ~~;e Reversej (See ~evers ) (See Reverse) (5ee Reversej SENT TO 5E T T ~ , (See Reverse) { SEIU7 T~ SENT 14 , ~ N fl _ ` SENT Tfl _ _ ~ , ~ , ~ , ~r ~ ~ ' - ~ ~~r'1 ~ ~ ~1 - ~ ~ ~ EN7T0 ~:t_ `~f~~ , c: d~ { .~~I,~~) ~~`~r:i ~ ~ ~li:';f~~ ~ ~ ~ J~'4C ~1`~tV~'~ ~4 j.~ SEN ' ' C.~ t~ ~ ~ ~ : . 't 4 ~ , 1 f.1~ I E F ~ ~I {7 - ~ . ~ SE{VT TO , , ~ ' (~l.A~' ~ ~ 4 ~ STRE~T AND N0. STREEF AN~ NC3. ~J f-~~"-I ~ ( 5 ~RE~T AND ~10. STREET ANp M0 ~ . . S'CR~ET ANg N0. - . . . _ i ) ' ' ~ A~4D ~ Ex a, ~ L c. ~ i~1' I~, Vl./~ I ~ w ~ ~ TRE , _ ~ ~l ~+~~r , rA , ~ ~ ~ , r<r~ ; ~ , v, 4 ~ , r l ~ ~ r ~ ; ~ r ~~r , a- - TREE7 AND NC7. , . 1 r~ 1I ~ ~~f~~l~ ~ 7 I'~ ti ti 1 P.O., STAfiE ANn ZIP COQE r7 t p ~ppE P.O., STA7E AND ZIR CODE p 0„ 5TA?E AND Z1P COD€ , P.O., STA7E AND ZIP CADE <<, STATE ANO 21P CA~E :a,. P.O., STATE ANO ZI ` ~ / - '~j 1 ~ ~ ~ - 1 ti ~ f • ' h G^ ~ ~ ~ ~y,l' ~lV C ~ + i ~ 3'i' 7 P~O.~ ~ { .0.~ ~ ~G~ "~I;, t ti r~'~ t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~LI T. ~r . GlJ/~ C ~ u~ ~ L ~ - J' iC N.P~> f. ~r~~% ~ ~ ~ ti y~''~` ~~~1~.~. . 1~11f1 y:W t ~ 1 I ~ r. (:'1i ~ , 1 . PCISTAGE i _ l~ ~ R 7A I F'flSTAGE ~ P.O., S'fiATE AhfL7 ZIP CQdE ~ y~ p4 /t l'~rr`-• . ~ , . . ~ ~ ~ _ C1S GE $ P()STAGE ~ $ $ 4 pDSTAGE Q P~;A~~ ~ Q CERfiIFIE~ FEE ~ C~ I~ ~ S~ POSTA{;E b p FEE ~ ~ CERTIFIEb FEE CERTIFIED FEE CE~TIFIEa FEE E T IE[3 FEE ¢ ~ CERTIf E a y y q~ SPECIAL OELIVERY 4 'y' ~ ~ i" pE~,IYERY ~ W 5PEC~AL [}EL9VEfiY a W SPfCIAL DELIVERY a W w Sf'E~4A~ DELIYERY Q CERTIFiEm FEE ~ . ~n W~ c,~p~G1A1 R£LIYERY W $PECIAL 4 ~ ~u a ~ ~ RESTRIC'fE~ DEtIVE~Y Q ~ W ~I~ ~ o p~ RESTRICTED RELIVERY ; ~ ~ 7€D D~EL4VE'RY RE57RICTED DELIV~RY . ~ RESTRICTED DELIVERY C RESTRICTEO DELIYERY 4 ~ W SF'ECIAL []ELIVERY ~ ~ ~ ~ a p ~~A ~ v► ~ W W SH41M 1~ WNUM AND DkiE u~. u~ NpM II►Ifl DAiE Q ti w$H4W 10 W414~1~ tillD OAiE 4 ~$H6W i0 WII~N ~l10 DA1E 4 ~ u► ~$HQW TD Wt10M dND f~liE Q W~~ DEIIVERED 4 a ~ v SN01416 WHOM rINO DATE ~ ~ ~ fiE5TRaCTED DEtIVER 0 ~ tiy ~~qW 60 W at pfUVEflE4 F_ y 6E~IVfREO w DFLINEREb OELIYENEQ a a i w~~ 9EUVFREQ r w~ ~ a o~e ~ u~i i u°~i H a~ic ~ SHOW ro w"OM AnD DEII'VERED r~' pc, u f a i c a' u W ~~n ~ S M O W i p W H O M, Q h 1 E, m N i l 4+ a"~ ' s+~w ~ y~ypM,'~Ai~, hND ~ y~ 5WOW 1D W4V(ii~l,'DA1E, AND ~ ~ rn $IIOW 10 WRDM. 6~iE, bHD 4 u~ SHOW 10 WNOM, 6~iE, AH~ ~ Ap6RES~ 4F 4EL9UEBY ~ ~ a"~ SH~OW ib WHpM, DA1E, hN6 s i 2 MW 1D WHOMI, DATE. ANl OF O E U V E R K ~ r r A Q~ R f S S O f D E l 1 V E R Y A D D R E S~ O F D E L l U L R Y ~ A O D H E~ S D f D E ~ I Y E R Y a. c n. y=~ A D D R E S S D F D E I I V E R Y ~ ~ r ~ ~ AODRESS ~ ; a, 0 0 ~ a, x a~ ~ N~~ w a o r,~`'„~ ~ o~ ~ W S N O w T C W H O M A M D ~ A T E 4 c,~ ~ p; RDDRM 6F DfCIYERY O ~ a O~ iD'l~OM AN9 4 A T f ~ ~ 7 ~$~IpV! 1 0 W H 4 M A N b ~ p ~ 4 J F W S H 4 W [ ~ W N ~ M ti? I D D A T E 5 H d 4! I ~ W H H(} M M A N a D~ 1[ ~ ~ f- f. 4+ a ~c pEUUE REp W I T M R~ S T R I C I E D ~ k O W I O W P I i 1~ H A N D U A i[ w~ 4 1 f Y 1~NED W I i N R E S~ R I C T E➢ a D E I i V E R E O W I~ 1 R E S~ k 1 ~ d o c O E U Y E R E D W 1 T N R E S T R i C f E D ~ 4 u c p{ U 4 E R E D W I i N R~ S i R l C 1 E D ~ a= b E I I W E R r ~ n. O E L I' ~ E i t E D W I T H B E S T R I C I E O t p c b~ l l ~ d Z O E U Y E R Y y o~' O E U V E R Y N P= 4 E L I 4 E R Y ~ m v~ D E I J U E N Y ~ W W SHOW Ttf WFOM AND DATf d ot KLIYERED WITH RESTMs,;, - ~ l~tli'JfR~ u r z 06 z N a a ~ T H+~~ r i t~ W~) M, U A i E A M D s ~ i x SNtrYM 10 WH6M, ~1iE AND o a , r, ~~H~M ~~XE ANp 4 ~ ~~NI TO WN~'M, aA1E AM11 ~ ~ ~ Y ~ SNOW ~1 Wb10M, UiViE AN4 v ~ i h O D fl E S S 4 f D E U 4 E R Y W 1 T 1 1 ¢ ~ SHOW TA WNQM. UATE +iND ~ c = nFOVfa+ ~ a ~~p~,,c p~ p~lilcRY WI~11 ~ii AppflE~S Of DEUUEflY WITH ~ rij AD~RE~S OF OELIVEHY WIiN ~ ot ;~rC 7~rfirn nEIIVENY v ~u ~A6RE5S 0~ DfllVfflY 4V~TH t o ~ ~y r ~ ~ IVVERY WVTN t~ ~ai , r" ~ r y p~ ~1 Y ~ RES1 lrr~q If~~l',~~n'r ~ RE$1RICT[~l ~EU~fRr T.. _ ~ RESIHIC~E IVERY ~ ~ ,3cr~~~~1~ ~ ' ca 4 ~ " _ ~ ~ • ~ 7Q7AL PP~ ~u t ' , ,t p g $ ~ " E AND F~ $ ~ I OTAI. P06,T.-~/kj`i~ $ TQTIII fQ~T 'A~I E5 $ P ~ ~ TQTAL PQSTIIbG $ ~y ~ cD o AGE N . i- TOTAL PQ~►"~ r _ . ~ - dTlt~ . ~ . ' ~ . r' fiOTA 7 , ~ ~ - POST Ff ATE m p~ w PQST R D~T~n ~ POS K ORp~T a w POS71i1~#1( N DAT~~ ~ ~ TO7A1r AS'aE A S . ~ ~ I K 6R ~ tC POS ~ j. a J' a l-'' / ~ - ~J V A 1 ~J ~ ~ A H POST V ~ . - Q ~ Q ~~~y•. ,ry t \ ' ~ ~J ~ a a ~ ~ ~f ' ~ ! ~ ~ ~ [ d J' ~ - h 4+ A l - m . ~ ~ - • P~ p /~T p - 'l . ~ ~ ~ ~f, ~ ~ Yr ~ ! ~ - G. PUST~ 0 ~ ~in ~ ~ a ~ ~r ~ , ~ . V ! ~ ~~D O / ~ O Si " X' . ° " / , a j~ ti . • q~ q~ T ; y ,r a U~+ m ~ + G ~j I C~ - o ~ . . ~ / ~ , ; 6 n ~ r i~ ~ ~ 1 00 W ;ry ~ ~ V , „ ~ - r a0 ~ ,'4`~ ~ ~ fk ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ r;r. ~ \ ` a :.~e ~ ~r a ~ ~ ~ ~ y`q C~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~1 ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ f-/J Z . ~ 4~' ! , . fy ~ . ( Y . O Q 1~ , ~ ~ 7 ~ W a P r~ ~ w ~ ;y _ ~ f, ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ a ~ ~ ~ . I I -v~ No. I~~ No~ NU. 12 12 8 7 Nu. ERTIFIE~ MAII. RECEIRT ~OR CERTIFIED MAI~ RE _ RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL Et~TIFIED MAIL R~CEIPT ~QR C , RECEIPT ~~R C a ylpEp- NO INSURAHCE COYERaGE PROYIOED~ MQ INSURIINCE COVERAG~ PRQYlD~D-~ ~ NO IMSURANCE COYERAGE PRDYIDED- MO INSUfUNCE COVERA6E ~ 0 Mpll T FOR INTE~RNATIOMAL MAiI OT ~DR INTERHATIQNA! MAII HOT FOR INTERNATIONAL NO w NOT FaR IMTERNATIOfV,AL MAII (See Reverse) ~See Reversej (See Reverse) (See Reverss~ ~ sEtuT rO ' SENT Tb SENT TO SENT TO SEN , ' ' - _ c;~cr, ~-i ~j~~r.~~'~~ ~~l'f1U~: ~ ~~`~,N~~~P~~ ~~Ip%"~~ 9~;~~ ; ~ T ~S , 3~ ~ L~r` STAEET AND N~ ~r~'~ ' T AND N0. S7RE T AND N0. STfi STFEET AND N0. STREE , f ~ LL l~L. I~) ~i' f v 1.~ 1~ ,'~~f\~' I.: u'1~ w- I~''/;~ f..`~ ~~f'1 r L ~ ~ S ~ ~1 P.0 , STATE AND ZIP GC~DE P.0„ STATE AND ~IP C~DE P,O., STATE AN~7 ZRP C(}t}E P,0„ P.d., STATE AND ZIR COt)E , 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ . la~~ ~ `i 4' ` %r~ ~~'~~r-r1: ',+v~ t~'-' i ~v ~ "i~ r~~r-1~= lr(I✓~, ~ ,9 L~r ~t0 _,L..~ ~ $ P~STAGE $ P4S' _ A/ l' LI-fF4 , _\41Y"s i- 1- A PQSTAGE 1 " POSTAGE $ POSrAG~ _ ~ a GERTIFIED ~EE 4 I a CERTIFIED FEE ~ CERTIFIED FEE a CERTkFIED FE ~ W IAL ~ELIVERY ~ Sf'ECjAL DELI4€AY 4 W ~ SpEG1i4l DELIVERY 4 W SPEC ~ ~ 4 ~ SPECIAL DELlYERY ~ ~ ~ tiESTFiICTED DELIVERY 4 RE57RICT€Ct C}EI~V~RY ` d ~ 6 I ~ R~STRIC7ED DELIVERY oL O C7~ RESTRIC`fED DELIVERY ~ QN ~ LL' w ~ W ti 5 W T~ WHOM AND OAi~ ~ uNi N O W T O W I~ 1 M A N D 6~ i f 4 ~ ~~y S H O W 1 0 W H Q M A N O 4~+ T~ 4 ' 0 C cy ' v p~y~RE[f ~ W ta. y~ 4 p~ uj v SP±:p','J T~:: Vdlle`~ r,V` IP?r °C ~ ~ DEIIYENED W ~ DElI4EREi1 ~ ~ F, ~ ~ t- ~ ~ ~ ~ oc vs f 7 cc c[ y~ W W ~ uf ~ T WH M ANfl ~ SHOW T 4 W H ~ M, t~ T E. A N D ~ u~ ~ S N O W f 0 W' H U M. O A T E, A N D ` M S H O W 0 0. D A~ E. 4 ~ k- ~ t- AODRESS O f D~ i I V E R Y Q y~~ A~ D H E S S 4 F D E U V E R Y ~ ~ a A 6 D~~ S S I~ D EL~UEBY ~ Q ~ ~ ~ S'JO'N r'r :ii:'i 44 O"~ W ~ p w g ~ Q ~ i.- Q y~j S#{~}W TU WVI a' ~'v A#ID RATE r~~ SHbW ~0 WHOM AflD aAi€ ~ f.. ~ W SHOW ~0 WH~JM AND D~TE ` f. ~ W SH4W 10 ~~S~RICfED ~ oC [1ElIVERED WITN RE$IRICffD a q, ~ aElf+~R[0 WITH RESTRICffD ~ d ~ ~ ~ ~~tVERY~ ~ e~ = DELWERY O Z {+~~Id(.nY ~ y i N o~ bEl y a ~t ~ -y o ~ ;,i r~Np o ~ SHOW 1~ WNOM, DA1E AND o 5#10M~~'~~f NO ~ ~ ~a' ~ ~ ~o .~'i`,~"r ~ q v ~ ~DDflESS pF DElIVERY WIiH ~ ~i'. hDUH~ i Ry ~ ct ~ 5" 4 c ' rd ADflR - ' ~ p~~-~~ i~-~ ~ ~ HESdRICTEQ ~ ~`^,R ntCf~~ UEII'~(Y ~ i, ~y~ i `ti 1 f ~~a~ . ~ , i ~r ~ ;'3 N roT~►~ ' ~~E ~rid~ ~ . ~ ror r POS ~ ANa ~EES TOTNL POST G,~ fE ~ $ ~s ~ ~p ~ ~ ! ~ ~ TdTA4 ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ TSTAGE68D S ~ ~ ~ A ~7E L~ w PO~TM R d ~ PQStMAR OR AT ~ ~ R0~'T11ARK ~U ~ c. a a r :'~i 4. d O. PO R ~ t ~ ~ • C ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ r ^ o ~ ~ o . ~ ~ o . G~ Q~~' c ~f/~ 7p ~ c~, i ~ ~ ~ x; ~ `1. `1 ^ ~ ~ ~ :E3 ~1 ~ , W ~ ~ o - 0~4 w ~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A. . ~ . ~ . _ r N Na. iVo. 121283 ; No. RE ~ RECEIPT ~FOR CEr~TIFIED MAIL ~ CE~TIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FOR C~r~TI~IED MAIL RECEIP~ FOR I NO INSURANCE COVfRAGE PRUYIDED- ~ TUNCE COYERAGE PAOVIDED- NO IMSURAHCE COVERaGE PR~YID~D~- , NO IN~II MAI~. HOT FOR IN?ER~IATIOHJIL MAII Np! F9R INrtERHATIOHAI hIOT FOR INTERNATI0NAL MAfI ~ (See Reverse) ~ 5ee Reverse) (See fieverse) t sen SENT TO SEf~T TQ ' SEN~f TC1 _ ~ , ~ !r )~1 i ~ D ~I ~~.1(,1~E.lC~ C r~ ~~az~ ~ ~P~~r~ L~ srA l\.IP f fi,,'►c STREEi AND Nd. ~~~14 ~ ~ ~ STREET AND N0. STREET AND N0. r~ 1 J r 5 L, `Y~ I • 7 J ~ t ~ - - ti ~ 'j ,-1 ~ = L~? ~ P l, ~l 1, 4/ L S l~ 0. 57AT~ ANR Z1P C A D E P. U., S T A T E A~ 0 Z I P C O O E P 0., STATE AND ZIP CC)DE -'re 'C i `-/4` /t . ~ ~ ~ + ~ 4 ~~~,i~ f y ~ ~ , ' l~~ s ~ c r '4'tt h r L . ~7,. POSTAif'aE I s ~ ~ ~ P475TAGE i $ f~4~TAC,E 6 CERTIFIED FEE Q y a CERTIFIEC3 FEE ~ R t19 GEA?IRED F~E y W sPEcIAL aELwEAY ~ ~ CIAL DELIVERY ~ W S~CIAL p~UVERY a ~ W SPE ~ a~ ~ f~E$TfiICTED pELIVE~Y ` ~ RES7RIC7ED pELIVER1f 4 ~ RESTRICTED DELIVEAY a pE O V! ~ ~ H ~ ~no ~r~ t ~ ~ ~ sHOw to w►ro~ ~~o oar~ ~ W ~ ~ ~ $~V 10 WH~tli w ~ ~DEU4ER[D ~ ~ W~ 51lUW Tb WNpM AND 6ATE y DEiIYERED 4 W_ y DfIIVEREA a rn ~ c ~ SMOW TO hNH{1M, QAPE, AND ~ a W u+ ~ ~ W~ iE A19D ~ y~ SN6W 10 WI90M, ~ATE, AHd M- ~ N y s~ow ra w~ar~, ~Y, 4 ~~,~flR€5S OF DE11VEkY ~ ~ a + lo- ~ ~ AD[?RESS Of DE~WfRY ~ C2 JE W r~ ADDHESS (Jf ~EIfVE ~ t d ~ ~ ~ w ~ n w f- ~ cjj uj SHOW F~ ~D DATE 4 ~~~$t{pW TO WVI~ AMD OAiE r u~ $RdN' 1~ WHOM AND DATE r- RE~iR~C1ED 4 DEIIV~RE6 YfB111 kESiRICfE~ ~ v~i ae UEll4E~.D ~ o= bEUVERY z t a~ cc DELiYEREU WrfH RE5TRM y o ae DfLfVERY a ~ N Q~ nEIIYERY x ot O ~ ~;t~4w iC~ wVItOM, fWTE AP,4 Q ~~fIOMI TO WHQM. QAiE Ar~D ~ CD ~ SHaMN it) WHaM, DATE AND i ~ ADDErES DEIII VERY W1TH ~ v LSS 6~ b E L 1 4 E R Y W I T H ~ ~ ~ i+ A I 1 6~'~ S 0~ { l E l 9 N E R Y W I T H ~ C i i A. 1YE R Y 6~ ~ E R Y aG- i ~[D ~EL . i GO f ~0 ~ ~ 701 T TAL " AGE 11 ~ ci ~ '9 ~ ~ 'N'OTAL JlNL1 FE ~ . $ / ~ TOT ~ yy , PUS ~ 1 PUST R DATE a ~ pK~[1 ~A"~G ~ a JO ~ d s: POSTAA R ~dATE a r. ~ Q ~ r- ~ c"~~a ~ o $ p ~ r-9 ~ r~i 0 * ~ '0 ~ 4 G: E 4 ' ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ,i~ 0 ~ ~!f'J~ ~ G,, ~ w , ~ . ~.,,r ~ ~ M , , , + ~ SPOKANE COUNTv. PLAIiNING DEPARTMENT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION CHECK LIST applicants Name Address Tel. No. Applicants No. r 1~~ . `1 ~ ' . Initi al s 71 PRE -APPLIC ATI ON FEE,($10 . 0 0) , REC E IPT NU MBER datej APPLICATLON APPO~~IE ~ (date) (time) PARLL E NGI NEERS SEC TI ON MAP. ASSESSORS SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400' Boundry). ~ZONE CHANCE A?PPI.ICATION. ONING WORK S HEET t . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECK LIST. PLOT PLANS (5 Black Line). ✓ ✓ PHOTO'S (8X10" and Discriptfon) FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NU MBER . > . l• APPIJCATION NUMBER _VF6-5 PROPONENTS NAME ~ PART II. RECORD PARCEL NUMBERS (Within 4.000) ON LAND FILE POLL CARD FORM (date) MAIL HEARING NOTICES TO SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS (date) POST SU RROU NDING AREA. (date) HEALTH DISTRICT, FIRE MARSHAL AND ENGINEERS REVIEW (Plot plan and legal). PLOT PLAN AND AGENDA TO GRAPHICSo MA►IL NOTICE AND AiGENDA TO CONCERNED STATE DEPTS. (date) AiGE NDA MAILE D T O APPLIC ANT. (date) FINDINGS PREPARED. ' PART III . ~ MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT. (date) HEARING - FINAT ATION (Conditions o. oETC o) RE50LUTION TYPEDa COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION ( RESOLUTION) (date) - i , . ' ~ a ~+M f ^ ; ` .tJ, 4"+ • •ox~ ~ ~ ~ e' ~ 1 - ~ ~~r'1'' . . . . ` • . . ♦ . ~~~~7, tl . ? w ` ~ s'~.,~ ~~''f~. '^Yw ► ~ y~rt~, ~ ` , . 1'~~' , . _ . . - i . . . . , . r'. - , • . . • ' t. , ► ~ , . . i.~,:. . - i , - • ~ ~r t+~,! • ~ . - i ~ ~ '~.i1.'!. - . ~ r'"t', I - i{' • . ' d - .t~ f 1 ti ~ r ~ , ~ , • '~~•~wr~lq~'110 k " s ~ . ,+y. - F~,i " i5..,~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~~/',,'IK f' . ' ; ~ ►r• ~ ' ' ! ~ . •i , . . - / Y " i •,i ~ ' ~ r . . ' y, ~ ~ ~ ~'r •r ~ ,.ti ~ C"~► ~ a ~ f r ~~y , ~ c. • ~ ~ . . t~• ~ ~ . . , •.:s• y• , .'i; N~' + ~ ~f•~ N~~. . r~ , r ~ y~~ , j~tr:~ ~ ~ ' ~ • ~ J , ' ' ~ ~~)~1.' . ' ir ' ' .v, . . . , ~ t~ y " . , .r t'~j • y . ~ , , ~,~1' , i ~ ` lar .w ~ 1 - p `j1 , ' • , ~ ' j 't,, , • • • 1~' ; . ' i'~~ ~ ~ s(~~ ~ . jyj'~i~+_ ' ~ ~ ~ ~~3 i ~ ~ ; ~ . , j~ . ~A ~'Jl ;F ~i , er • ' ~ . ~ • , l~ ~ . ~ ~~1 1 • 7 i r• -t', i ♦ i •~r r ' n ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ - . . . ~ ' • , ~ ' r ! ! . I J . . . f~ v~ 1 ' 1 ' ~ ~ J~. • ~t ' . ' ( , ~r - ' ♦ • . , `~'~y. 1'~ ~ . _ f ~ , , r, ~ ~ 4~'~~"~ . r. J, f~ xf' ' . • . ,t ` r • J ~ / f^'~r 7 or• ` ' ~ , ' • I , ~ . f1 . . • .rl~ ♦ ~ ' . I ~ ~ •f ~ ♦ ~ . ~ ~ i ~r ~ - ♦ . . ' ~ S ~ ` . ; 's , ~ ! ( _ ~ • r . . . , I ~ q~." ' , . . ~ . , . ~ • ' 11+. , ' ^ l~/' ~ ~ . ^ ~ , . t , - • . . , . ~ t ;~i r,R' ~.s , ' ~t ° f ~t ~ , ' ~ r . . , . . " . . , r' l ~~~t fyy~ li t'~ r• 1 S ~ ~ r • " ! 4l . ~ ; •~s ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . , d , *f ; . l ~ ~ • 4' " J ~v , ~ i . ~ , ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ , ~ ~7 ~ , ► , . • ~r•y ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ x • ` i~ ► . , . . ~ " ~i ~ ~ 1;. : ~ ~ ~ ~ r: f ~l~+. ,j~ ~ 4 y ' 1 •r ~ ~ yt i ~ ~ ~ , ~ . I , ~ ~`J~. ~ •i~~~~~'~'~~ ~ f~~ ~ ' ~ ~f ~ ~ /I ~ r~ ♦ ` ,J~ ~ ~J~ 3~ ~ .t ~ . # ~ t ! ~ t• '1 ~ ,1 r , , i . ! ~ . . 1~s. r- ~ , ~ t •'dr.~~~'a1r~~ • ~ . C ~ ~l ~'+j~~/{MS,~~~~~ ~ , `f . r ~ • . .fr i N ~ `.S~ . ~ ~ ~ i ',~1` ~ ( . ; , .~.l' G LIi.~ ~ . • ' ~ ` a i ~ . . , , . • r t y~ ~j • ~ r ~ ` - / , - • " ~y ~ ~ , - • ~,My • , ~e ••1T' ~z d ~t ~t~ .,..•j~+~ . ~r - r ~ ~ ~1t~` ~=f 1 j4s~1 ~`t ~ ~t ~t~R,~. ^ I`tt,`1 . ~ yr~"•y~~i , ~rt }j`, I~' ~ 5.~+ ~y~ ~T F ~ ~ ' ~r ~ ~ ~ ~ 'a1' f'~ . Y t'r- ~ F. ~ i .t ~ 1" t~' • ' ` ~ ~ , 4 • ~ • / + , {a ` ~ ,~y ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ }~If r' ~ . 1 t ~ w• I . ~ ? I • ~ . , ~y t r , , r~ x~ f ~ ~N ~ ` ; i 1 fi ~ • ~ . ~ ~ 1 ~ A , i ~ ~ , r' ~ou"~H.,. ~ V IEiN LO0~O w ~ ~J ~t ` ~ ~ , ~ ~ 1 ~ ' - . . . ~~7M ~ . t . r t ~ ,k4 M ~ r. y;' •-~J~ _ 1 . k . ~ ~Yi . . . ~ < ~ y ~ ~ ~ k . A~` ~ ~ ' . :.s~-;~ ; . ~ ~u ,.'U I} ~ , i 4 yt~ . ~ ~R' ` ~ '~1 ~ ~i~~ ~,a~~~ ~ ' . j .'l,. tit.~, . ~ f ' ~ ve' . . i . ; Kla • - • t It' ~ y ~r-'.. ' , " t ~ ~ M ' • -,~fl~ ~,e~ ~ ' ,t `.~-:~~:i,`: . ~ ;~~~~"l~ ~J,% , 4 s` w 1 ~ ' 'y..~~ X •f ~itA'_~ _ J~.._ ~ ij i , . r;~ _ • ~~~f~T',~~" 'i- . .~4q~~! •~:~:r,ati~ _,.ti,~~_.tf~,` . 1~- v~ ~ i , r ~ . 40 i , . . v IEw Lon KIQD Qo~rtH , .s - , ~ ~ I .l. ; ~ is, . 41 1 , . . • ~-r - J . , ~ ~ . . . .I'. ~ ~ ~l~~~ ~'~1 , . .~I ' . i~. } -Y, ~ ..~'.~l 7~• ~ . r w.~/'"~ ' _ , ^ _ ~ -J i~~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ 'k~.. . ~ !i ♦ ~ i S~ ot.~~ - ~ - 'I~ r 5 r • , a 4. ~ ~ ' r A i•f• , ; .,.t' r z PSTITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMISSION Re Y ZE-131-78 Agricultural ~to Multifaunily I am a resident of the area affect,ed by the proposed rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct,a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexa Let it be Imown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is,out of character for the communityg and thattnls now open space should be developed Zn a manner that is in keeping tbe existirsg neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding propertieso 1 ADDRESS s f NIIMES t r ~ r ~ i I 4 ~ N - Y If I y P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PL`ANNING CC+lMISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Rgricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment complexo L'et it be lmvwn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnisinow open space should be deyeloped in a manrier that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood9 in particular, single famfl.y residential xith lot `size comparable to the surrounding properties. A DDRESS a ~ ZOL LI F,4 t R v/ NAMES a ~~;~C~' , - r P$ T I T I 0 N , TO SFOKANF COUNTY PLANNING COMMI,SSION ~ ~ , Re a ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area,affected by the proposed rezoning,appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexo Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood,; in particular, singl'e family residential ~Y xith lot si2e comparable to the surrounduig propertieso ,1 r . ADDRESS,: K7' 11.5 , NMS t a%~ i j - r - ~ r PB T'ITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PtiArTNING COMMISSION y Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoningappliaation. I am of the opinion that tbe applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifami]y apartment complexo Let it belknowm that I oppose a project such as this, tbat it is out of character for,the communityo and that tnis now open spa.ce should be developed in a manner that is in keepirig the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size coR,parable to the surrounding propertiesv ADDRESS: riAMES s , ~ PETITION TO - SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CQKKISSION Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning appliQation. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be knowm that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ` ADDRESS t a NAMESt ~ 1 y ) Jr f PETITIO.Id TO SPOKaNE COUNTY PI.EINNING COK+iISSION Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily `I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. ,I am of the opinionthat the applioant ~ proposes to construct a high-density multifami-ly apartment ' complex. h _ Let it be laiowm that I oppose a pro3ect such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed 3xi a manner that is in keeping the , ~ existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size coR,parable to the surroundzng propertiese ADDRFSS s~/~~~ ~ /7+ I c~ J~ 1 I-5 Y`IL 1 f Z./ NlMES t cr . - - E + t PI TITION TO - SPOKANTs COUNTY PI.ANNING CCMMISSION Re t ZE-131=78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamU,q apartment complexo ~ Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open apace should'be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentia.l Kith lot size coR,parable to the surrounduig properties. ADDRESS: , NAASS s ~ v 1 PB TITION ' TO ; SPOKANE COUNTY PT.ANNING CCMMISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of tbe area,affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a higli-density multi.family apartment complexa Let it betknown that I oppose a project such as thiso that it is out of character for ttie community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single Umily resi'dential with lot size coR~parable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS t NAMES r ~d.P ,f - - ~ ~ . _ , yr r ` s y P9 T ITIOH TO SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Ret ZF-131-78 Agriculturalto Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed ' rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apar,tment ' complex. Let it be laiawn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open sPace should be develoPed in a manner that is in keePing tne 1 . existing neighborhood9 in particular, single family residential with lot size corrparable to the surrounduig propertfes,e ADDRFSS: Fa, 1 Y 1/ GJW NAMES s ~ _ _ ~ ~ 0 P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMyiISSION Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applioant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the commuriity. and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; 3n particular, single family residenti,al with lot size cocrparable to the surrounding properties. ~ ADDRESS: NA,MES s - ~ - a I PETI'TION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION - ` Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamzly , , I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applioant ~ ' proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be,known that I oppose a project such as this,, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis nox open epace Bhould be developed in a mariner that is in keeping tne } existing r,eighborhoodo in particular, single family residential with lot size coR~parable to the surrounding propertiese ADDRESS s C - _ 1 112c3 NAMES's oll . , - , - 4 . > e _ y» t r P9 TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily - , , I am,a resident oF the area affect,ed by the proposed reZOning application. I am of the opinion,that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ~ complexo Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that - it is out of character for the communityo and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounduig properties. ~ ADDRESS s , P$TITI0N TO SPOKANE COUHTY F'LANNING COM+IISSION Ret ZT-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning applicationo I am of the opi.nion thatthe applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamUy apartment = complexo Let it be knowm that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a mar►rier that is in keepYng the existing neighborhood'o in particular,,single family residential xith lot size couiparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS s NAMES s i } t - , r r ~ a P9 TITIOM ~ TO SPOKRNE COUNTY PLANNIHG CCMMISSION Re t ZE-131'-78 Agricultural to Mult'ifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the appliaant, proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let Zt be laiown that I oppose a project such as this, that ' it is out of char"acter for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existiM neighborhood; fn particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surround3mg properties. l/ ADDRESS s ~ ~ i r ~ J _ Rf *T~IiSi~{ILl'~T s! ~ ' ' ~ - - - - - z : PSTITION TO SPOKANM COUNTY PLANNING C0MISSION Re t ZZ-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicationo I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ~ ' complexo r Let it be laiawn that I oppose a project sucb as this, that ' it is out of, character for the,community, and that tnis noK open , space ehould be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to tbe surrounding properties. - R { ! a bDRESs : riarEs: _ , P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLaNNING COMISSION - Re,s ZF=131-78 Agricultural to Mult3.family I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed - rezoning,application. I am of the opinion that the applrioant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ` complexo Let it be luiown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the,community, and that tnls now open space should be developed iri a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; f.n particular,, single family residentzal ' xith lot size cocr,parable to the°surrounding properties. ~ ADDRESS s NAMES s ~ - - . r PB T I T I 0 A1 TO - ' SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISS ION Re a ZE-131-78 agricultur,al to Multifamily I a►m a resident of the area affected by theproposed 1 reZOning applicatione I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamiIy apartment ' complexo ~ Let it be knawn that I oppose a project suchas thiso that it is out of character for the community, and that trnis noW open space should be developed in a manrier that is in keeping the existinig neighborhood; in,partic_ular, single family residential , xith lot size coR,parable to the surrounding,properties. ADDRESS e , NAMFS2 v~ ~ 7 t P$TITION ~ TO ~ SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNIATG COM+lISSION Re t ZE-1 )1-?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multi:fami],y apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this. that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open - space should be developed in a manner that'is in keeping the existing neighborhood'; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS s NAMES s ~ - X _ - , . , - - y 1 4 - PB TITION ~ TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMISSION Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am,of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexe Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this,, that it is out,of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounduig properties. ADDRFSS : 1 ~ - - " NAMFS l " i p ) f PS TITIOAi ' TO SFOKAM COUNTY PLIINNII* COMISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to MultTifamily I a►m a~resident of the area affected by the proposed trezoning applicatione I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density mul'tifamUy apartment ' complezo Let it be known that I oppose a project,such a,s this * that it is out of character for the community,lo and that tnis now open space should be developed iri a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhoodo in particular, single family residential ' with lot size comparabletto the surrounding propertieso ADDRESS : NAMES, s ~ , , _ t _ i i f! l ~ +r i P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Re,s ZE-1'31-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed ~ rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifami.]tiy apartment ' complexo , Let it be Irnown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open ,space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tlne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentYal with lot size cocr,parable to the surrounduig properties. ADDRFSS s` 12U i,P-LAJ , =t - - ` - y P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMMISSION Re: ZF-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am,a resident of the area afPected by the proposed reZOning appliaatione I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamUy apartment ' complexa Let zt be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it Fis out of,character for the communitp, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential s,rith lot s3.ze coR~parable to the,surrounduigr properties o ADDRESS s A r- ~ J i F1 ~ ~ t ' P$TI'TION TO SPOKANE CDUNTY PIANNING COMMISSION Re t ZE-1 31-7, 8 Agricultural to Multifamily , I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicationo I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexo Let it be known that I oppose a project such as th,is, that , ~ it is out of character for the comniunity, and that tnis now open epace should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the exi`sting rieighborhoodo in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding propertiese , ADDRESSa r-CLC I ~ NAME$ g ,J' 642 ~ r (51 ~ 0 PB TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamil,q I am a resident of tbe area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifami],y apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a pro3ect such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existirsg neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS t v~ 1"'& ~ NAMFS t ~ `41 ~ ~7 r P$TITION TO SPOKANTs COUNTY PtANNIN(3 COMMISSION Re t ZE-1 31-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the appliaant groposes to construct a high-density multifamUy apartment ' complex. I,et it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tbe existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size coRparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESSs , ~ NAYSS ~ v ,1 PB TITIOAi TO SPOKAM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Re s ZE-1 j1-?8 Agricultural 'to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. I,et it be known that I oppose a project such as this,, that it is out, of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should'be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhoodo,in particular, single,family residential with lot siZe comparable to the surrounduig properties. e y- , ADDRESS = G1 GI NAMES: . , T , 1 - / T 1 J l l 1 1 P,$TITIO,p TO 'SPOKANE COUNTY PtiANNING CG1MISSION Re: ZT-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning appliQationo I am of the opinion that the applicant , pTOposes'to construct a high-density multifamil,y apartment . ' complexe Let it be knvxn that I oppose a project such as this,, that it is out of chara'eter for the community, and that tnis now open . space should be developed in'a manner that is in keeping tne exis,ting neighborhood; in particular, single fatnily residential with lot size coR,parable to tbe surrounding propertiesa ADDRFSS s . NAP+IES t ~ . /unr. , , A r ~ - , 1 t { - , I Y 7 c i 4 ` PB TITIOH T0 SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexe , Let it be knawn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the cornmwnity, and that tnis now open spa.ce should,be developed in a manner tha,t is in keeping the existing neighbor'hood; in particular, single family residential with lot size coRparable to the surrounding propertiess - oe, A~DDRESS: ~ '2 2- (,GGi C~fi ~ ~ NAASES t ~ ~ P9 TITION TO SPOKANT COVNTY PiANNING COWISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of thearea affect,ed by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamil,y apartment complexe Let it be knawn that I oppose a pro,ject such as this, that it is out of'character for the~community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keepuig the existing neighborhooda in particular, single family residentlal with lot size coR,parable to the surroundzng propertieso ADDRFSS : o ~ NAMES s A41)17 l, > ~ P B T I T I 0N TO SPOKANF COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI0A1 ~ Res ZT-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily ' I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed - rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. - Let xt be known that I oppose a project sueh as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is,in keepang tne existing neighborhood; in particular,, single family residential xith lo,t size comparable to ttie surround'ing propertieso ADDRESS s J NAMESi . S vi i T 1 i i 1. ~ PB TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIH(3 COMriISSION ReY ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily `I am a resident of the area affected ;by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be l4nowm that,I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhoodg in particular, single family residential xith lot size cocr,parable to tbe surrounding propertiese A DDRESS s NAMES s f ~ i i c PB TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLAHNING COMISSION Rs t ZT-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I ana a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. ~ Let it be known,that I oppose a~ project such as this, that ' ~ it is out of,character for the community,and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing aneighborhood;, in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the sur,roundzng properties. , ADDRFSS:, rAMEs: f `f PS TITION TO - SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCHMISSION Re t ZE=1 31-?8 dlgricultural to Multifami.ly I am a resident of the area affected by tbe proposed ,rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamU,y apartment ' complexo . Let it be luiown that `I oppose a project such as this,; that it is out of character for the community, and that tnzs now open ~space should be developed in,a manner that is in keepZng tne existing neighborhood9 in particular, lsingle family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounding propertiese ADDRESS: ~C; C'~1~-~ a2 ~ NAME." t • 1 , pB TaTZON TO SPOKAlM COUNTY FLANNING COMMZSSIDN Re t ZE-1 31-?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area afSected by the proposed rezoning application. I aom of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to eonstruct a high-density tnultifamil,y apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I vppase a project such as this, that it is aut of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be develaped in a ma►nner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particul.ar, single family residentzal with lot size coR,parable ta the surrounding properties. ADDRFSS s j ~ N~IYS h4,.1 b ~ i ~ P$TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PZANNING CCMMISSIDN Re s ZE-131-?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the propased rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamiltiy apartment ' complex. Let it be laiown that I oppose a project such as th1s, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis naw open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tMe existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential witb lot size coR,parable to the surrounding properties. ADDRFSSs , NAMES 3 r . i p$TiT1 oN TO SPUKANF C4UNTY PLANNING COA'iISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural ta Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the praposed rezoning apglfcation. I am of the opinian that tbe applioant proposes to cvnstruct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is vut vf character for the cammunity, and that tnis naw apen space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing r,eighbarhood; in particular, single family residential with lat size camparable tv the surrounding properties. A s: ~ .~•~'._r~'~~.~.~~ DDRFS ~~~a ~ P9 TITION TO SPBKANE CUtINTY PLANNIIJG CCM+IISS ION R,e a ZF-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident af the area affected by the proposed rezaning application. I am of the opinion that the applicaat proposes to canstruct a high-density multifamUy apartment ' complex. I►et it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out af character for the community, and that tnis now ogen space should be developed in amanner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in partzcular, single family residentia.l With lot size comparable to the surrounding praperties. ADDRTSS t I Z.210 " C NAMES s ~ r P I i P9 TITION` TO SFOKAM COUNTY PLANNING COMISSION Res ZE-1`31-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning, applicationo I amt of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be laiowri that I oppose a project, such as this, that it is out of character for the communityo and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single famf].y residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding propertiese ADDRFSS s rNJMS a , , . , r } PS TITION TO MKANF, COIINTY PL'ANNING° CMDiISSION , ~ - Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am &resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifa.mUy aparatment ' complexo Let it be known that I oppose &project such as this, that it is out of character, for the community, and that tnis now open space 'should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the r existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentzal. xith lot size cocr,parable to the surrounding propertieso LL ADDRESS s ~ / ~ - - - - N,AMES : r P$TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING C(MM?SSION Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural ta Multifamzl,y I am a resident of the area affected by the prcposed rezon3ng application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes tv construct a high-density tnultifamily apartment ` CQIIIpl@]C. Let it be knawm that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the communitp, and that triis now open space shvuld be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in garticular, single fami.ly residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding praperties. . ADDRESS s -'SM46-~~ , NOlES a ~ c t 7 P$ T I T I 0N TO - SPOKAN$ COUNTY PLANNING CCMMISSION Ret ZE-13148 Agricultural to MultifamLV I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning~appliaation. I,am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' Icomplexd Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that , it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhoods in particu]ar, single family residential with lot size coR,parable to the surroundzng propertieso . ADDRESS a . &211 NAMES t C~~e' i 1 - ~ _ i , ~ f rt , r P $TIT7ION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PI.ANNING COMISSION Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident,of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamil,y apartment ' complex. Let it be laiown that I oppose a project tsuch ,as th1s, that it is out of character for the community, and' that tn is now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existiM neighborhood9 in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding propertieso ADDRESS s /gD 3 > ~ NAMESt ~ . _ r ~ ~ly ~ f t - J Y V t PB TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNIAIG CCMIlMISSION - Rea ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamzly I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicatione I am of the opinion that the app].icant proposes to construct a,high-density multifamily apartment ' tcomplexo Let it be knowm that I oppose a project such,as thist that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis~now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existiM neighborhood; in particular, single family residential arith lot site comparable to the surrounduig properties o , , ADDRFSS t , - , 0 NAMESi ~11 ~ ~ / - ( ~ P$TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMISSION Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamilq apartment ' complea. Let it be lalown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open epace should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS a ~l 0.5 C/o ~ • ~ ~1,~~ `2, ~ P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMMISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamil,y apartment ' complex. Let it be laiawn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis noW open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. E Ce 3 . / ADDRFSS = ov~l NAMSS s a. 44 r~J FZv . a , P9 TITION TO SPOKANM COUNTY PLANNING CCHA'IISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be knoWn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential With lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRFSS• . ~ NAMES t / 9 OZ-0 6 , J ~ P9 TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMMISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicatiron. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be knowm that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size cocr,parable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS soe fl q u~ f v NarEs: 0LJLL ~ ~ P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COM+IISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifami.ly apartment ' complea. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open spa.ce should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing ne3.ghborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ~ ADDRESS t NAMES t ti ~ ~ r > ( 1 1 P9 TITION TO - SFOKANE COtJNTY PLANNING COKKZSSION , Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily _ I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning application. I am of the opinion that the applicantF proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexo Let it be known that I oppose aproject sucb as thiso that ~ it is o,ut of character for the community, and that tnis noK open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size coRjparable to tbe surrounding properties. ADDRFSS; ~ &&? neg~ rcfC , ~ . ~ , PB TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING C0MMISSION Rs t ZE--131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applioant proposes to construct a high-density multifamUy apartment ' complea. Let it be knowm that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential With lot size comparable to the surrounduig properties. ~ ADDRESS s ;&0J NA,PRES t i.~ P$TITION TO SPOKANF COUNTY PLANNINr COKKISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complea. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentlal with lot size conAparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRFSS: NAMES s tft f-d/ ~ ~ P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PZANNING COMMISSION Re s ZE-1 3t -?8 Agricultural to MultifamUy I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposea to construct a high-density multifami]y apartment ' complea. Let it be knowm that I oppose a project such as this,, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. , _ I ADURFSS s NAMES t ' r ~ r P$TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PLJINNING COMISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes i.o construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' Complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the conununity, and that tnis now open apace should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size cocr,parable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS: NAMESt . ~ o ' PB TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTYr PLANNIHG COK+iISS ION Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily, - I am a resident of the area affec,ted by the proposed rezoning applicationo I am of the opinion that the applicant ,proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Iet it be known that I oppose aproject such as this, that it is out of char_acter for the community, and that tnls now open space should be developed in a manner'that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot siee coR,parable to the surrounding propertieso ~ . ADDRESS s : NAMES: . _t ~ - f P$TITION TO SPOKAM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifami].y I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant psoposes to oonstruct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be lunown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; fn particular, single family residential tirith lot size cocuparable to the surround3.ng properties. ~ ADDRSSSs ~ NAP2ES t • ' - , 1 y P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMISSION G Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamil.y I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed ~ rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexo Let it be knorym that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhoodo in parti'cular, single family residential with lot size,comparable to the surrounduig propertieso ADDRESS t E Pi C~._ NOMS s ,l , - ',n l~4-7 a , r P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMZSSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applioant proposes to construct a high-density multf.famU,y apartment ' complex. Let it be knawn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open apace should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentlal xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRFSS s r~ /;~-ej~40 NAMES s ' . r PRTITION TO SFOKANE COUNT'Y PLANNING COMMISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning applicsation. I am of the opinion that tbe applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the communityl and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neigbborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size compa.rable to the surrounduig properties. -~'7 0 F ADDRFSS : ~ ~ NAME$i LL2L~~~ tl ~ af t PB TITION 'TO ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PIANNING COMNlISSIOAT Re t ZE-1 j1-?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affecated by the proposed rezoning applicationo I am of the opinion that the4applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it,be knoxn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of 'character for the community, and:that tnis now open space ahould be developed in,a manner that is in keeping tbe existing neighborhoodo in particular, single family residentsal , with lot size,comparable to the surroundz.ng properties. A DDRESS s ,r L - , PB TITION TO SFOKANF COUNT3C PI.ANNING CCMDui?aSSION Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multif'amily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the appliaant prvposes to construct a high-density multi.family agartment ' complex. l,et it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of aharacter for the community, and that tnis naw open space shcruld be developed in a manner that #,s i.n keeping the existing neighbarhovd; in particular, single family residentw with lot size cotriparable tv the surrounding properties. ADDRESS s NAMES s AL/I d ~ . , PFTITI0 N T4 SFC)KANE COUNTY PLANNING CO+"IlKISSION Rs = ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifam3.ly I am a resident vf the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am cf the opinion that the agpllcant progoses to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Iet it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is cut of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tha existing neighbarhood; in particular, single family residential with lvt size coo-Agarable to the surrcunding properties. ! ADDRFSS : r NAMES: CL') ~ o~. c~.. l . ~ ~ ~ -IT t ~ ~ f ~ 1 P$'T I TfI 0 N TO , SPOKANE COUNTZ PLANNING COMMISSION Re s ZE-139 -?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed , rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to,construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexe Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for th'e community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existiiig neighborhood; in pa.r.ticular, , single family residential with,lot size couiparable nto the surrounding~ properties. ADDRFSS: /dj t 9qeu-O'6 ~ NAMFS't Y"I, te -e dxo 9 1 1 4 PB TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamUy apartment ' complex. Let it be lrnown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character For the commwn3.ty, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size cocr,parable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS t u , -19]k 41 ATAMES s , PB TITION - TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMIlMISSION Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamUy apartment ' complex. Let it be lanoWn that I oppose a project such as this. that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open epace should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size coR,parable to the surround3ng properties. A DDRESS t NAMFSt ~ ~ I r I P$TITI0N 10 SPOKANF COUNTY PLANNING COWiISSION - Re,: ZE-431-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area atffected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant ~ proposes to construct a high-density multifami]y apartment ' complexo Let itt be knotim that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed,ina manner that is in,keeping the , existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential 'With lot si.ze,comparable to the surrounding properties. aDDRrss: ~ 11,y'a 4! 1=^2E'd~&cO-,- - NAMEs: c 1.4 -t c.d-S ~Z,&,c-21 r-- - - a i P$TITIOp _ TO SPOKANE COUNTY PI.ANNING COMMISSION ~ Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural,to Flultifamily I am a resident of the area affected by,the proposed rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applyicant proposes to construct a high-density,multifamil,y apartment i ' complex. Let it be knotim that I oppose a pro3ect such as thiso that it is out of character for the community, and,that tnis now open sgace should be developed in'a manner that is in tkeeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to tbe surrounding propertieso ADDRESSs ~/~SvZ G~ .~~~~it~►~~J' NAMES s . _ /~i• , ~ i , P'$TITI0N TO SFOKAM COUNTY PIANNING CCMMISSION - Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicationo I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct aihigh-density multifamilq apartment ' compl'exe Let it be known that I oppose a project,such as thiso that it is out of,character tfor the community,g and, that tnis now open jspace should be developed iri a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; 3n particular, single family residential with lot size coR,parable to the surrounding propertieso I ADDRESS: ~ /J - - - NAMFSt , i r P3 TITION TO SPOKANtti COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamf.ly apartment ' complea. Let it be laiowm that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open apace ahould be developed in a manner that is in keeping tbe existing neighborhood; in garticular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS s ~ ~ NAMES = ~ do _ P9 TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CO+IlMISSION Re i ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multi£amil,y apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character far the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size cocuparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS s o ~ . NAMFsS s f / ~ OLA4~ PB TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMrIISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning appliaation. I am of t,he opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifami7~y apartment ' complex. Let it be lanown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the cotamunity, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS t 101:~XCD,eei CK NAMES: ~ . , P$TITION TO SPOKAM COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Re s ZE-1 j1-?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complea. Let it be kmown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis nox open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentlal xith lot sise coR,parable to th surrounding properties. ADDRFSS s - ~ . ooe ruuMs: . ~ : - _ ' ~ t f I ~ PB TI,TION ~ TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMKISSION Re t ZE-13148 Agricultural to Mult'ifamily I am a resident of the irea affected by the praposed rezoning applicatione I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density+multifamily apartment -0 ' complexe , _ Let zt be known that I oppose a pro3ect such as this, that it is out,of character for tZie community, and that tnis noW open space should be developed in,a manner that is in'keepingl,tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single,family residential .xith lot size comparable to the surroimding properties. ~ , ADDRFSS s r , o a , NAMESt 60d: i y t ! I 1 P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMISSION Re a Z~-1,31 -?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area aftected by the proposed rezoning applioation. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposessto construct a high-densitp,multifamily apartment , ' complexv ~ Iret it be lnown that I oppose a project such as this, that it i's out,of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a mariner that is,in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, singletfamily residentLal ~ xith lot tsize cocr~parable to the,surroundi.ng properties a A DDRESS : { r ti ( ~ r a~ ~ ~~ss, , , PS TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamfly apartment . ' complex. Let it be knoxn that I oppose a project such as this,, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is 3.n keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentsal w3.th lot size comparable to the surround3.ng properties. ADDRESS: ~ , , ~O s- C3 mC ~ r I S-0 Y\- ) . ~ r P9 TITION TO SPOKANS COUNTY PiANNING COMKISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applioant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily agartment ' complex. Let it be knawn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surroundang properties. ADDiRESS : NAASES s . ~ , PgTITI0A1 TO SPOKANE COUNTY P'LANNING CCMMISSION , Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural, to Multifamily I am a resident,of the area affected by the proposed ' rezoning applicationo I am of the opinion that the a,pplicant proposes to construct &,high-density multifami-ly apartment ' complex. Let it be knowm that I oppose a pro3ect such as this, that it is out of character for the communityt, and that tn is now open , space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential With lot size cocr,parable to the surrounding propertieso , ~ A DDRESS ; , „ _ - , ("o L-~ - z - o NAASES s ~ _ ~ - PE TITI0N TO SFOKANE CDUNTY PL.ANNING C0MMISSIDN R+e s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamity I am a resident of the area afrected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinian that the applicant prvpvses to canstruct a high-density multifamily apartment ' camplea. Let it be knvwm that I oppose a project such as this* that it is aut of character for the community, and that tnis now apen space should be develaped in a manner that is in keeping the existirig neighborhaod; in particular, single family residential with lot size corrparable to the surrouncl3ng groperties. ~ r ~ s. ADDRFSS: Y . C (r ~C L- NAMESt ~ PB T3TION TO SPOKA.NE C4UNTY PLIINNIlJ(3 COMMISSION Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to MultifamAy I am a resident of the area affected by the pragased rezon3.ng application. Iaun of the opinian that the applivant preposes tn canstruet a high--density multifamf.ly apartment ~ COIApleA r Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out c,f character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhvod; in particular, s3.ngle family residentiaal with lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. . ADtREss : ~ q65 MMs: . L ~ ~ . ~ ~ P$TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMIl►IISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appl2cant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be luiown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open apace should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, si.ngle family residential witb lot size coR,parable to the surrounding properties. . ADDRESS : ~ 1C • X `3~~ /r.o . 45 • T • 4-~ NAMESs Ltt't.~ P$TITION TO SP4KANTs C4UNfiY P'LANNING C0MMISSION Res ZE-1 31-?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I ana a resident of the area affected by the praposed rezoning application. I am of the opin3Lan that the applicant progvses to cvnstruct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out vf character for the community, and that tnzs now open space should be developed in a naanner that is in keeping the existing neighbarhood; in particular, single famil.y residential with lot size comparable to tbe surrounding properties. ADDRESS s Cy L(Y 0 ~ NAMES s , C V ~ f P$ T I T I 0 ld, TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISS ION, Res ZT-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of cbaracter for,the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed,in a manner that is in keeping the existf.ng neighborhoodi in particular, single fanail.y residenti.al With 1ot size coirsparable to the surroundi.ng properties. , ADDRFSS s NANlES s _ 1 ~ e , ~ _ n c PB TITION TO SPOKANE C4UNTY PI.ANNING, CcmmISSION Re s ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicatione I am of the opinion tbat the appliaant proposes to~construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexo Let it be known that I oppose a project such as thZS, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space shouldbe developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing r,eighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size coR,parable~to the surrounding propertieso At7DRES5 s ~ NAMES s ` ~ ; ~ i 8 ~ . , PB TITI4N TO SPDKANE COUNTY PLANNINa CQM"IISSION Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the prvposed rezonirig application. I am of the opinion that the applicant prvposes ta canstruct a high-density multifamilq apartment ' conaplea. Let it be knawm that I oppase a project such as tha.s, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis nvw open space shvuld be develvped in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surroundang groperties. ADDRESS s Z I / `r 'q At NAMFS t . f P$TITION TO SP'OKM COUNTY FLANNING CCMISSIQAt Re t ZE-1 31--?8 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicatian. I am of the apinian that the applicant proposes ta construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now oppen space snould be developed in a manner that is in keeping the Qxdsting neighborhvod= in particulart single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounding praperties. ADDRFSS : ,~~I r•~~~ ~ .,~J ~ of< F'` NAAlES t ir, A -A r PB TITION TO SPQKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMMZSSION Re: ZF-1 31-?8 Agricvltural to Multifamily I am a resident cf the area affected by the progvsed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant prapvses to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be knrnwm that I oppase a project such as this, that it is Qut of character for the cammunity, and that tnis now open space shvuld be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential With lot size cnmparable to the surraunding properties. ADDRFSS s NAMES s ~ i FB TITION TO SFOKANF COUNTY PLANNING C+OMMISSION Re t ZE-i 3t -7$ Agricultural ta► Multifamily I am a resident of the arva affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant propases to construct a high-density multifami-ly apartment ~ CCmPlQR • I.et it be known that I oppose a pro,ect such as this, that it is out of charaater far the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keepirig the existing neighborhaod; in particular, s3,r,gle famil.y residential xith lot size oocriparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRSSS x JO1 ~ e,-" NMSa ~ ~ - PFTITION TO SPaKAHANE COUNTY P1rANNING C0MMISSION Re t ZE-1 3t -78 Agricultural to Multifaanzl.y I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant pro,pvses to construct a high-density multifaur►i],y apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out af character for the community, and that tnza now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; ir, particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrvunding properties. ADDRESS t --j~0 ~ AIAA~S t . r PE T I T I 0N T4 5POKANE COUNTY FLANNING GGMlSSION Re s ZF-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamlly I am a resident of the area affected by the propased rezoning application. I am of tbe opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifarnil,y apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out ot character for the cammunity, and that tn is now ogen space shoutd be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family resident.aal xith lot size comparable to the surrounding groperties. ADDRESS : ~ r ~S Z i ~ T i t r I' E, T I T I 0 N, TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMMZSSIOAI Re s; ZE-1)'1-78 Agricultural to Multifamll:y I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicatfon. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamil,q apartment ' complexa Let it be known that I oppose a project such as thxs,, that it is out of character for the community,,and that tnis now open space should be developed fn a,manner that is in keeping the, existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentia.l xith lot size,comparable to,the surrounding propertiese ADDRFSS t ~ . . NAMES,s 60' Ra c 1 P$TITION TO SPOKANF CflUNTY PLANNING CO+lMISSIaN Re t ZE-) 31-78 Agricultural to Multifamil.y I asn a resident of the area affected by the praposed rezaning applieativn. I am of the vpinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complea. Let zt be known that I opgase a project such as this, tbat it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the ex3.sting neighborhood; in garticular, sir►gle family residential with lot size compa.rable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS s NAMESt ~ , PB TITI,1ON T.0 SFOKANF COUNTY PLANNIHG COMMISSION Re: ZE-131 -78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of,the area affected, by the proposed rezoning applicationo I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density,multifamil,y apartment ' compleao Let it be lviown that I oppose a pro3ect such as this, that it is out,of character for t,he community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tbe Fexisting neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size coR~parable to the surroundzng properties. A DDRFSSs..J~ ~ ~ NAP~S t ~ 0-2/ , ~ P$TITI4N TO SPOKANE COUNT'r PLANNING COMMISSIQN Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I a.m a resident of the area affected by the propvsed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the agpliaant proposes to construct a high-denaity multifamil,y apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the cammunity, and that tnis noW vpen epace should be developed in a manrier that is in keeping the existing neighborhovd; in pa.rticular, single family residentxal with lat siZe comgarable to the surrvunding properties. A DDRESS z NAMESs . ~ ! r PB TITION Tt? SFOKANE CQ[JNTY PLANNING COMMISSICIN Re t ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the apinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ` complex« Let it be knowm that I oppase a prvject such as tha.s, that it is out of character fvr the community, and that tnis naw open space should be develcped in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentzal with lot size coR~pa.rable to the surrvunding properties. A DDRESS s )c o NAnS a ~t-14 CAA 2 ~ ~ ~ r P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PiANNING CCMISSION Re: 2E-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamUy apartment ' complex. Let it be knawn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existirig neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounduig properties. ADDRFSS s C~'CLC-'P ~ 000, iVY1iiS S - r O PB TITION TO SPOKANE Ct)UNTY PLANNING COH+IISSION Re s ZF-i 34 -78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZaning applicativn. I am af the opinion that the applieant proposes to cvnstruct a high-density multifamiV apartment ' camplea. Let it be knawm that I opgose a project such as thZS, that it is out af character for the community, and that tnis naw vpen epace should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, sir3gle family residential with lot size coRparable to the surrounduig properties. ADDRFSS': NAMEs: ~ ~ / P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifami~y apartment ' complex. Let it be 1rnoWn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community$ and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. 1.210 7 I~ZeAce -WAu,.e, ADDRESS : . rlMs : fi r r PB TITION TO SPOKIINE COUNTY PLANNING COMA'iISSION Re t ZT-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opz.nion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be knowm that I oppose a project such as this, tbat it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentzal xith lot size comparable to the surrounduig properties. ADDRTSS t - i I ~ , NAMES s i" i + +4 t t t PETITI'ON TO SPOKANE COUNTY PI.ANNING CO++MISS ION Re t ZE-9 31-?8 Agr,icultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by, the proposed rezoning appliaationo I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' compleao Let it be lrnawn tbat I oppose,a project such as this, that it is out of character for th_e community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. A DDRESS a NAMESt A"e, , 4 V P9 T, I'T I 0 N T,0 , SPOKM COUNTY 'PLANNINa COMMISS ION' Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifam3ly I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaaat proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment complex. Let it be known that I oppose a project such as thFis, that it is,out of character for the communityg and that tnis now open space should be developed in'a manner that is, in keeping the existing-neighborhood,; in particular, single family residentlal `Vith lot size coR,parable to the surrounding properties. ~ ADDRESS : - v a d NAMES s ~ { / -zv1 S ti I ; 1~ l/ i" L - • • Y i p ~ ~ P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION , R,e= ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezonuig application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' COmpl@x. Let it be knawn that I opgose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the conomunity, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existiM neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size cocr,parable to the surroundulg properties. ADDRESS s ~ NaMs: ~ ~r • t ~ ~ ~ - Y V P$TITIOAI - TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCMMISSION Ret ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning appliaationo I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construat a high-density multifami.ly apartment ' complexo Let it be known that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of cbaracter for the community, and that tnis now apen space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne - existing neighbor,hood; in particulart, single family residential . with lot size,comparable to the surroundung properties. ADDRESS s . ' ~ ~ NAMFS t , J// v ' ~ ~ PFTITION TO SP+OKANS COtJNTY PLANAIING COMMISSIDN Re s ZF-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the praposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant progoses ta construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complear. Let it be kncnan that I oppose a praject such as this, that it is out of character i"ar the commun3ty, , and that tn is now open space should be developed iia a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residentW with lot size camparable to the surrounda.r9g properties. ADDRESS : ~ NA~s ~ ~~'v~~~.~'` _ y - P9 TITION TO SPOKANT COUNTY PLANNING CCHIlylISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to aonstruct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be laiown that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open apace should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRESS: ~ NAMESt r 1 i r 1 ~ u 1 ~5~ t ' ' 4 r H P$'T I T ID 'Ai TO ,SPOKANE COUNTY PiANNING COMMISSION , ,Ree s ZE-13148 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area arffected by the,proposedl _ rezoning applicationo I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes toconstruct a high-density multifami~r apartment ' CODIpl@X. Let 3.t be lmown that I oppose a project Isuch ,as this, that it is ~out of~character for the community. and that tnis,now open spa.ce should be developed in a manner that is in,keeping the existing neighborhoo&, in particular, single family residentzal xith lot size coR,parable to the surround3ng propertiese ~ r'A~DDRESS t NfY_li7SO - ~ ~ - t- _ H ~ I P3 TITI4N TD SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING CCHMISSION Re t ZT-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the groposed rezonirg application. I am of #.he opinion that the applicant groposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be known that I oppase a pro,ect such as this, that it is out of character for the communitp, and that tnis now open space shvuld be developed in a manner that is in keeping the existinng neighborhvod; in particular, gingle family resident3.a1 with lvt size comparable to the surrounding progerties. A DDRESS : J44409-c- NOMS: , ! PB TITION TO SFOKANE COUNTY PIANNING COMMISSION Re a ZE-i 31-78 Agricultural ta Mult3.family I am a resident of" the area affected by the groposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant prvposes t,o construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. I,et it be kno+rn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space shauLd be developed 3.n a manner that is in keeping the existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential with lot size camparable to tbe surrounding properties. ADDRESS s /Z iz rv Y . ? NAMFS t ~ . ~ ~ . PB TITION Ta SPOKJIBE COONTY PlANNING CCM+IISSION Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident vf the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicatian. I am of the apinian that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multi:famil,y apartment ` complea. I.et it be knawn that I opgose a project such as this. that it is vut of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhaod; in particular, single family residential with lot siae comparable to tbe surroundulg properties. ADIJRSSS a NA1~S s . ~ R PB TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNINa COMMISS ION Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant proposes to construct a high-density multitamily apartment ' complex. Let it be lnoWn that I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character for t,tie community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping tne existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRFSS: ruuMEs : ~ -0222 C--O" ' I P$TITION TO SPOKANS COUNTY PLANNING COMMIrSSIO1I Re: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by tt►e proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion thaf. the applioant proposes to construct a high-density multifami],y apartment ' complea. Let it be known that I oppose a project stich as this, that it is out of character for the community, and t.hat tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is j.n keepzng the existing neighborhood; in particular, single fa.mi.ly residential xith lot size cocr,parable to the surrounding prciperties. ADDRESS s 1181 (.a Jaro" Ge4 C/0'apo NAMESt . . ~ ~ , - - r - , PETITI,ON TO SPOKANF COUNTY PLANNING CCMMISSION Re s ZE=131-78 llgricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by tlie proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the applicant pr,oposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complea. Let it be knowm that I oppose a project such as this, that it ,is out of character for the community, and that tnis now,open space sho uld be developed in a manner that is in keep'ling the existing neighborhood9 in particular, single family residentsal ,with lot size cocr,par ble to the surrounding properties. ADDRFSS,s _ NAA~S a y _ ~ tir ' - , ! PS TITI'AON TO - SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING, COD++IISSION R,e: ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area afSectied by the proposed rezoning applioation. I am-of the opinion that the applicant proposes to,construct abigh-density multifami~y apar-tment ' complexa Let it' be known that I oppose a, project such as this, that _ it is out `of character for the community, and that tnis, nowopen space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the exis,ting neighborhood; in,particular, single family residential ,with lot size coR,parable to the s,urrounding °properties. ,f AD DRESS= - ✓ ~ NAMSS: 1 c F 4 , ~ . ~ , uf _ iJ , P9 TrI T 1, 0 N TO SPOKANh COUNTY PLANNING CCM+iISSION Re: ZF-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I amXa resident of the area affected by the proposed reZOning appliaation. I am of the opinion that the applioant proposes to constructi a,high-density multifamil,yy apartment ' Fcomplexo Let it be laiawn that° I oppose a project such as this, that it is out of character `for the community,, and that tnis now open space should,be developed in a manner that is in keeping the yexisting neighborhoodo in particular", single famil,y residential with lot size comparable, to the surrounduig properties. A DDRESS s a A J 1 7 r t P$TITION TO SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNINt3, COmISSION R82 ZE=1311-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning applicaation. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complexe _ Let it be laiawn that I oppose a project such as this,, that it is out of character for t~e community, and 'that tn is now open space shouldbe developed in a manner that is in keeping tne s existing neighborhood; in particular, single family resideritial frith lot size comparable `to the surround3.ng properties. ADDRESS,s J NAMES P9 TITION TO SPOKANF COUNTY PLANNING CC+IlMISSION Res ZE-131-78 Agricultural to Multifamily I am a resident of the area affected by the proposed rezoning application. I am of the opinion that the appliaant proposes to construct a high-density multifamily apartment ' complex. Let it be knotim that I oppose a project such as this. that it is out of character for the community, and that tnis now open space should be developed in a manner that is in keeping the ~ existing neighborhood; in particular, single family residential xith lot size comparable to the surrounding properties. ADDRFSSa 1~ia3 ~ NAMES: . . V ~ . ~ e ~ ~ F?LE 02F. -t3 I-IF q w a V S- . ~ 44 tl • ' P<<x * Crroes bec.k . , _ . ~ ~ . _ . , i.Y;`- ~ ~ , TfiRESHOLQ OETErZM.INATiON ~ OECLARATION QF roposed/fina3) ~tJ~ ~ N ~ ~Nte. (signifi nce/nonsignificance) i. Oescription of Prooosal 7A (~OmU 1Cx Q,_I1~ ~~re~ M.if1► {e t iAtJl. T 2. Proponent: e s~ ~ ~ c b ~eG k 3. Con'tat*_ Person:'hone:lSS$~ 4. :ounCY Action 'c-; Reauested: v Zone Chanye; ~ i's'eliminary ?lar Aoproval: Final Plat Apnrcval; Change of Condition Cther: 5. ,.ocatton of ?ropo5al : MIL't *T! g~A R.*14sI E . Irf tA ~•C~ fi. !ead agency: SPOKANE COUNTY. 'r1ASHINGTON This aroposai has been determined to 0 have a sionificant 3dverse impact on the environment. :an EiS is 'eauired under RCW 41Z1C.0330 , c). i!^is .3ecision was maCe after review by the County of 3 com- p etea enviranmentai checklist ana other information oA file with the lead agency. 7. Responsihle Official: Propos2d DeClaration: Final Oec'.3ration: vame__ F- Name-j4Ar y L,qr&e~ Signatur Sianature . I Title I Title G.~i~I rIl7~I~ • DeFartmenL ~~rll w ~ la 4 Deoar-I►nent / Cate tbi„1-111 f nuate 8. For leclarations of Significartce Only: Date of Expected "uraft EIS availability (determined by Responsible Off?cial) Oace of ?ssuance TO 3E COMPLETED 3Y RESAONSIBLE OFFIC:AL: a. Brief description and lis'ing or those environmentai impaccs l?3aing to suth ceclaracian: I 0. B1'iBf exulanation ;T whdt measure;, if 3f1}/, COUIQ be rdn@n JJI th2 doAliC3nt =c ^reven'c ~Y '71C1GdLZ :~e envirOncnen:al 'r.roact of :he oroRcsal *.C SuCh 3n °x_A11L th2L ~`.h2 rt'SU7115'Die i"iC13i _v'UiG ;.ens:der 3`'2`Ji5?C proposai vith a )c-;si5ie resul-,,na jeciarstion rf iQn4i gni,`itance: ► File No ZE-131-78 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. I NTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 17, 1978, and the members of the Cammittee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Ted McCoury, and John Culler and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Mr. Groesbeck for a Zone change, Agricuitural to Muitipie Family Suburban for the purpose of apartments. B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the existing land use in the area is generally residential, with vacant land and school 2 That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residentiai development. 3 That the existing ioning of the property described in the application is Agricultural 4. That the provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environrnentai Policy Act) have been corr►plied with 5 That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted reguta- tion or intent of adopted policies 7. That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification 1 - - File No ZE-131-78 8. That the proposed use is incompatible with existing uses in the area. ~ 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee does not find the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimentat to the public health, safety, and welfare. C ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Plese and Groesbeck for a zone change, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban as described in the application should be denied without predjudice. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion • a. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments above. b The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, building materials, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 2 ~ J . File No. ZE-131-78 c. A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance bond shail be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prior to building permit issuance d That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution #77-1392 be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed by the Planning Department staff. e Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. f. Direct light from any exterior area lighttng fixture shail not extend over the property boundary g That, if after one year from the date of the Hearing Examiner Committee's action, the applicant has not received final adoption of the zone change, the application is void Motion by: McCoury Seconded by. Culler Vote. Unanimous 3 Ky R yY ..H sJL1_ ' - -,File No. ZE-1341-78 HEARtNG EXAMIVER COM(1'IIITTEE ~ % I ~ Chai rman , . , , ATT EST : . ' FRED L. DAYHARS'H Planning Director B ~ . Y" ' 5 4 t r Q c j`.,. txi { ..r " - P 0 KV A 1 4 L 't (J- FlRrt DEPARTPIENT Ao"oo A' • 641*1 EAST 10019 SPRAGIJE AVE. 0 SPOKANE, WaSHINGTON 99Za6 • TELEPHONE M 9Z8-1700 4f "i f~i~e' . NoveeER 9. 1978 , ► , ~ N~t s FRED DAYHAR H. RA~+I NG DIRBCTOR ~ $PO ~0 ~11~t I I S ION ' uI~WAY~~F7tf1~E ILDiNG • jEF ERSON - Y011KANE* SHINGTnN DEAR Pk. DavWsH: THE FOLLAWING PRELIMI Y VIS AND ZplVE CLASSIFICATION ~ FOR UPGRADING HAS BEE IEW~ FOR I PROT~CTION: ~ - - 140 FLAI~ID - - RNER F E .b S ~ ` ~ ~R K 7 ~ yy Y - ' 1- - 54 ~ J/ t < ` y ~ • ~ r ~ JYF ~ ~ •l-~ MA INS AW *ED ~ TAUna K VE EAS ACCESS ~ FIREF ~ , lpl ~ ING SW4L.L, BE AP I0R TO ~ "Nd~ . v ~ , ~ ~~Y j , • ; _ ' (~,r i f L t .i- ~ !y a ti ,,zL-.. _ .~t S df, ` C:i~ ~ K -QF INSPECIDRS R. c.~.~ • _ . _ ~a,~~ . - - - 1 ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~g N~v 16 ~ . SQ4vtmk~ ,,U oclioNl OE~ N%%, PREYENT' FIRES SA YE LI PE'S _ . ~ ~ AGENCY ltESNUNSE rUltM DATE : Tu: ~ / , ~~l ~ sc ~f F'kOM: Name : Title: d; s ri~ r~aETY~ snr 10, Er~w• Agency : F c^ .L~ C: D /O q ~ /yc- SUBJECT : Lea~i Agency !J i'1 / u' Appl icant :__~~Q k P ro jec t: 7" ¢r l7 ~,d v ~i /)02, I HAVE REV IEWED 't'tiE ANU : Env.Ck. I.15t, Yrop.-Final-Dec. of Signif. or Non Signif., 1)EIS - FEIS WATEEt QUALI'1'Y • A. WOOIO' Revlew H'ur Approval Reyulred ~ 1. Septlc tank W/11,500 G.P.D. ur 50 or cuure services 2. Mechanical 5ystem or lagoon W/3500 G.P.D. or lU or mure services. 3. Commercial or industrial facility. 4. NYUES Ytrmit required T S. State Permit required B. E.I.S. 1'reparation Requested C.W.I. !'reparation Reyuested U. Envirorimuntal Ctiecklist Requested E. Water t2uality SCandard5 Modif icatiun tteyuired Appllcant '1'u lie Notif ied F. No COt1Ullf:ll L 0i1 _ - C. NU ObjeC C 1 Un 1'U tl. Uetatled Cunuuent5 At[acl►ed AIR QUALl7'Y ( 1 n Cuunt ies uf Jur ISdI'ction) A. Notice c>f Cunstructiun kequired ti. liurninb Permlt keyuireci - C. Uetuiled Cununents Attaclied SUI.L SUURCI: (Lf'A Uesibnatiun) A. L'roject Witl►In Aquiter (Recharge 'Lonc) ti. EPA kev iew ANpeurS Neressary C. Yroject Within Streamfluw Lune ~L. S J 1 EuJ ~ O 2 ~ p P 20 ~1 A~. - t F TN E rl A. cZ-ct ac. a y 4-11b rQ , ~ K~:YAK~.u BY' _ 006 G~►~ip.~t.i 4 is . 1 .~0X, 41vR,e D4.4 1- ♦ tS JZEQtI i12t01'ITLE; _E21 A a_N O e! 4-.o Q~ . ~~'QcJE' T~,O, oTflE~t ~is ~oT. t• ' ' AGENDA, NOVEMBER 17, 1978 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZOIVING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Time: Friday, November 17, 1975, 8:30 A. M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floot' North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 5. ZE-131-78 * Aaricultural to Multiple Family Suburban a. Location: Section 9, Township 25N, Ranqe 44 EWM Part of Lot 9, Block 7, Mirabeau Ranch and Lots 1 to 5, Block 8, ptn lyg north of line drawn from pt 22.7 feet s of NW comer Lot 9, Block 7 to east line Lot 1, Block 8 at point 667.4 feet south of NE corner of Section. Part of NE1/4 beginninq at NE corner of Section 9, thence S 637.4 feet; thence W 552.7 feet thence N 637.4 feet; thence East 549.7 feet to POB b. Applicant: Plese and Groesbeck N. 909 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 c. Site Size: Approximately 8 acres d. Existing Zoning: Agricultural e. Propo sed Zonfng: Multiple Family Suburban f. Proposed Use of Property: Apartments (172) 21.5 units per acre g. Application of Zoning Provfsion: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 h. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearfng may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environ- mental impact. i. Vicinity Location: West of Pines Road, south of Euclid Avenue, extended. -7 - Q r r I, ti i~~► Q~ ~ Z ' . Z , Z v ~ • ~ • , _ ; • ~ ' dLP ~y . . ~ ~ °C ° AVE ~ - - - 4 f ' CP•r,g,it ,q ~ \ qj p ~ AR E a ' • ~ ~ ,u,r L ► . 1 ' ~►~"'O a ° * v - T ni - _ . t • EUGLiD AvE _ i . • ~ - t~ .~s#i ~ 1 J ~ . m ; ~ F 6xg euc KE rE _ . . . - e ~ f ~ ? 0 MARIETTA t JACxS ~ AIA '1~ E A t OR g` . LARLlSI.E ~R O ~ - 4 9 Q L ~ aiM2496- > ~ P - ~L 0969 ~yc < W a ~ , pc J,N ~ _ ~9y aA M A ~ Q L ~NAN1r01r ~ z f C 19 65 SNANNON . ~ ~ ~1 L i ' ~ : • _ 'e~ ' ~ Z ~;r.ti' ' - _ " ,&~►h ri~. ~ 9G '4 O ~ P ~ t J1 Z =t i p ~1 ~ aoq ~ G lq q . c o c / , oa xw E ~ a ~ M OvEI.L) ; SINT01, 1 T ` Z ~ ~IMTO m Sw~R tI00NE , T. ~ D E 5 M E T ~ a - o~~ _ ° ~ , .rr h~ ~ tv.«c ~ ~ ni'S M ET AN i 4 -13~--7Ir , ~ AFFIDAVIT OF VEIUFICATIQN OF POSTING STATE 4F V'rASHINGTON ) j ss COUNTY OF SP4KANE ) , betng ficst duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a cttizen of the Unlted States of Acnerlca, and a resldent of the State of Washinqtoa over the aqe of 18 years. That on the 4W day of , 19_;T,, I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct coptes of the hereto attached and tncorporated hereln by reference NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ln a consplcuous manner at each of the foilowlnq locattons, to-wit: I . 2. 3. DATED THIS t►AY OF , 19 . SIGNED Subscribed and Sworn to before me thts ~day of 19 /,0 , ~ Notary Publtc ln and for the State of Washington, residtng at Spokane, Washinatot z~-r3t-~8 . (My' - ; ` . . • PI.ANIViNG DEPARTMENT ~ ~ QUBIlC WORKS BUILDlNG N. 811 JEFFERSON STAEET ~ r-,, ~ "`'A ~5 „'-5,~ A ~'~j-.• -.M~"7L~'.~r PHONE 456-2274 • z .'n 1 ~ 1 'i ~1 i i ~ SPOKANE. WASHINGTON ~U~`LFjO , . SvpKanC COUNTY COu-' ~CLSL MEMORANDUM Creg. dg•) db l0r. C(e , ~ TO: ~A~1w~ ~ru~• ~krl1~ A4~w: TowA Zv~s-~us ~qtlN: R N S Steil+o1~ ~ufl trey. o44) O.T(Ori OA0 100• *6 ~t+~.13ob C~ s ~ FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 811 Jefferson Spokane, WA. 99260 (509) 456-2274 Attention : Zttl' REFERENCE: Lead Agency Destination, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Check] ist, map; all or svme of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spolcane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTIPJG AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: Z 1/" w{~~~~ ~ ~i~,~ f G r ot~ b~G ~ ~ f • S..~ • This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4). ) or an aGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (wAC 197-10-040 C3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in 4JAC 197-10-340 5}, a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on Oe-IJ . Please respond, if appropriaie, at your earliest opportunit , but no later than the public nearing scheduled for AJoI±, 0t_0 ?8 • The subject proposal or action (IS, LOC.4TED WITHIN THL SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER OR ANO?HER AREA OF POTENTIAL IfIPACT TO THE aQUTFER. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Envirornnental Impact Statement (EIS)_ or a Ground Water Impact Eval- uation (GWIE), pursuant to the Environmen-Lal Protection Ag2ncy's Soje Source Oesignation or regulations pertaining to }his desigration, should be prepared. Enciosures STAFF ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 17, 1978 ZE-131-78# AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: PLESE & GROESBECR b. §pokane Couaty Health District: The applicant ehall comply with rules and regulations of the Healtti District in providing for adequate sewage dieposal. All necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to buildiag permit issuance. c. Countp Fire Marshal's Office: Fire District #1 1 Mains aud hydrants to be installed, in accordinace with the Spokane County Fire Marshal's requirements. Access aad circulation plans for emergency vehicles to be approved prior to building permit issuance. d. Water Purveyor: Irvin Water District #6 has an adequate supply of water and sufficieat capacity to serve the property owned by the applicant. Water service would be subject to annexation and approval by the Spokane County Boundarq Review Board. III. CONDITIONS If the Planning Commission approves this request, the following conditions should be considered a. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments above. b. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Heariag Examiaer Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Admiaistrator will be permitted, includfng, but aot limited to the following changes: Building location, building materials, landscape plans, and geaeral allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to reguletions set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. c A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance bond shall be approved by the Cownty Zoning Administretor prior to building peraiit issuance. d. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Actioa pursuaat to 43.21c.080 RCW and the Board of County Commiesioner's Resolution #77-1392 be accomplished by the applfcant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Boerd, as instructed by the Planaing Department staff. (contiaued) STAFF ANALYSIS NOVEMBER 17, 1978 ZE-131-789 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: PLESE & GROESBECK I. FINDINGS OF FACT a. Zone Classificatioa 1. North: Agricultural, established, 1942 2. West: Agricultural Suburban, established, 1956 3. South: Agricultural, established, 1942 , 4 East: Agricultural, establiehed, 1942 b. Land Use 1. Site: Vacaat 2 North: Trent School 3 West: Residential 4 South: Vacant and residential 5. East: Vacant and residential c. R~Iional Comprehensive Plan - 1968 The Plen Map has designated this area appropriate for Residential development. d. Uaique Features: No comment received from agency. e. Compliance with S$PA: The Planning Departmeat staff has circulated a proposed declaretion of non-significance aad received ao comments from Agencies of Espertise, therefore, wauld recommend that a final declaration of aoa-significance be issued. I I. REVIEWING AGENCY COrIIHENTS : a. County Engineer's Office: The Couaty Engineer's Office has requested the following be considered if the rezone is approved: NOTE: All required improvements shall be built to meet or ea;ceed minimum County construction standards. 1. Access permits for the advertised property shall be obtained from the Spokane Couaty Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits. 2. An appropriate oa-site drainage disposal system shall be approved by the Spokane Couaty Eagineer's Office prior to the release of building permite for the project. (continued) ~f s ` STAFF AATALYSIS NOVEMBER 179 1978 ZE-131-78, AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: PLBSE &,GROESBECK e. Inteirxo'r driveways and parkiag areas shall be paved. f,. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. g. That, if after one year from the date of the Hearing Examiner Committee's - actioa, the applicaat hasenot received final ad'option of, the zone change, the application is void. ~ (continued) ~ FILE 7Y- • 3 l - ~ - ~l ~ : i • I ~ - ~ STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIR~~NMENTAL CE ~KLIST_ ~ .;:7~fl •~~a , , 7 SPOKANC COUNTv COURT NOUSE I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the Z2 . The following data briefly describe5 the proposal: A. Action (s) Requested: Y Zone Change; Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval; C'nange ot Condition Other: B. Description of Proposal: 1~2 G1,~t//~ , ~~,~L~ • C. Location of Proposal: 4444 II, Review of Checkli s t: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) ~ Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) X Air (9) Natural (26) Utilities Resources (3) ~ yV3ter (10) Risk of (17) Human Upset Heait h (4) vy\ Flora (11) -,Y Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing (I9) X Rec,, (6) ~ Noise (13) iX Trans./ (20) Arch. / Circ. His r . (7) Light & (14) ~ Public (21) Other Glare Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following ques tions : LOc'-,MV o~,~ 2ZOW ~1?82~4W~P C. Discussion of impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommp-ndations: Based on this staff review of the entTironmental checklist, the staff: A. V/ Concludes that there are no patentially si-gnificant adverse impacts and recommend s/is sues a proposed declaration of nonsignificancs. •s^S. B,.,.~_ Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommend s/is sues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommend s/is sues a declaration of significance. c IV. Staff inember(s ) revi ewi ng checkl i st 6~' . FILE ► ' . r • ' . I' f • 's. . /r y• ~ ' _ THRESHOLD DETERMINATION . t DECLARATION Of propased/final) S1,u Av - (significanCelnon5ionifiCance 1. Description of Proposal : %-eA)F L=Re►M 14tat ~ g&. owiTS d.U "dj!f,tM 2. Proponent: Pi,~ VA 3. Contact Person: Phene:;40~ a. County Action (s) Requested: -A10#0 Zone Change; Preliminary Plat approval: Finat Plat Approval; Change of Condition Other: _ocation of ?roposal : ~ ~ ~Be* V Af4r% Ajf C/ 6. ~.eaa Agency: SrOt:ANE 0UNT,. 'mAShINuaTGn This proao ~ 5een deten+iined to a a sianificant adverse irtwact on the environrtient. .~n EIS is re~utre nder RC'~ 43.21C.~30 ,2 c. is decision was made after review by the County of a ccm- pleted envi 1 checklist and other information oA file with che lead a9ency. i Responsible Offic;al: opased Declaration: Final Dectaration: Vame ^lame Signature Sionature Title Title 7epdrunent Department Ja te Da te 8. For Declarations of 'Significance Only: uate of Expected Jraft EIS Availability (determined by Responsible ufficial) Date of Issuance TO 3E COMPLiTED BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICZ1iL: a. 3rier descriation and listing of those =_nvironmental impacts 'eading !o such declaratinn: AAA Dd'A.tt ~ T~~t1,~ o✓r'~ S/~F SOv,~F ~ r~ ~D✓~~tSF AFFt't~ OrtJ /~tJINM~tJ #00117U. 0. 9r?-r explanation of ;rhat aieasures, ir any, could c? :sken tiy :he apolicant to nrevent or iiLiqate ttie envirnnmentai imoact of the proposal :o sucn an excen± t;iat the resConsibie orf;ciai cculd consider 3 revi5ed pro osal ~rith a aossible resultin ieclarztion of nonsigniricancQ: ~ 770A) DW Oor AOd47WA) FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: Tulv 17, 1978 Application No:~~--f 31 ' 7~ Name of Applicant: Plese and Groesbeck Street Address of Applicant: North 909 Pines Road City: Spokane State: WA 99206 Telephone rIo. 926-9555 Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural , Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Existing U se of Property: Agriculture Proposed Zone Classification: Multiple Fami1X Suburban Proposed Use of Property: Apartments (172) 21, Iegal Description of Property: Part of Lot 9, Block 7, Mirabeau Ranch and Lots 1 to S r Block 8, ptn lyg north of line drawn from pt * 22 , 7' s of NW c:orner Lot 9. Bloc.k 7 to . east line Lot 1, Block 8 at uoiDt 667 4' south of NE cornPr of Sec-_tinn Part of NE 1/4 beqrinninQ at NE corner of Seckion 9, thence S 637 thPncP W 552 T 7' L thence N 637.4'; thence East 549.7' to POB. , Section: 9 Townshipe 25 N Range: 44 EWM Source of Legal: Tax Statements ~ Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 09 S 41- 90 01 Property Size: ApproximatelX 8 Acres. , Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: - 0- Street Address of the Property: None assiped as yet Who Holds i itle to the Property: M. C a 1 i s t r o If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Purchaser , r !9F Igeunelar-les G.F their , - - Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel make this proposal warranted_? This site was a.Qricultural but now is surrotlDded by residential development, Trent Grade School & Pines Road recent17 widened to four lanes. The property is much too valuable for single f amily development & is best suited for multiple family suburban. 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties ? The site is presentlv an "unc:arPd for weed 12atc " Oiir anartmPnt development with maintained landscaping will improve the neighborhood, appearance and its values. 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone clas sification ?(If no, why NO - Th e present owners have tried to use the land for agricultural purposes, but it is too steep and dry. The property is now too valuable for agricultural, or single-family development. Its proximity to the freeway makes this an ideal multiple-family site. I. the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthtuily and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. (Signed) 7,-,t (Date) I - Z - , ti ~ + Z ~ , ~ . . 'v .il ( .t ' , ~ _ ~ r > ENVIROKM£N7AL C4ECKlIST ~~i I.troQuction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chaoter 43.ZiC. RCyl, requires all state and local governmental a~encies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when liccnsing prfvate proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Inpact SWtement be prepared for a11 major actions significantly (and "advenely-'. as per +tAC 197-10) affectina the quaiity of the physical envirortment. 'he purpose of tris checklist is to hlep the agencles 'n- vo-ivea Cetermine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please ansr+er the `oltowing questions as cartQletely as you can with the irtfonnation presently availabla to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight fmpacts will result. The revie++ers of the checktist wi11 be aware of and concern :hemselves with the dearee of impact, asking you far more information, if necessary. Where 2xplanations of your answers are required, or wnere you beTie`ve an exptanation wouid be heipful to government decisian-mkers, include yuur eacolanation in the space arovided. or usr adCitionai q qr% if nece5sarv. You shoulG fnctude references co any reports or studies of whicn yau are awara and which are relevant to e ansr+ers yvu provide. Canolete answers to these auestion s law wi11 help all agencies involveG Nith your praposai to undertake the reouired enviranmental review without unneCessary Celay. The fiollvwing Questfons appiy to your totai proDOSaI. not just to the ifcensQ for whicfi you are currentty applyinq or the pro- aosal for which approval is saught. Your ansti+ers ShauiQ includ8 tht impaCts which wi11 be Caused Dy your prooosai when it is completed, even though coraptetfon may not occur uncil sometfine in che future. This will a11oa all of the agencies which wilt 5e invoived t0 Conpie:e Lheir enviromentai reviea naw, rrithout dupllcatinq papenvark in the future. No application shall be arocessed until the checkiist hss been camoleted and returned to the appropriate County department. State tar+ recuires exolannj;orts for e~rer,~ "~~es" and "r.ravoe" answer an che ct~ecklist. ?he person camaleting che fon++ rtray oe required to arovida explanaL;ons ror `no' answers, and in some cases. more detailed information to aiG in a threshoid determination. NOTE: ;his 9s a stanaard for+n baing used by all state artd iocal aqencies in the Stnte af 'aashiocton for various types of propoSalS. Many of the questions rtay not apply to your proposal. If a auestion does not apply, just answef it "no" and snntinue on to the nC%L 4uestfon. t1VYIRONMENTAI CHECKLiST FORM 1. aAcxcRauNo Name of Proflonenc: PLESE & GROESBECK Phonr vumeer 926-9555 z. Aaaress of Provonenc: North 909 Pines Road , Spokane, Washincxton ~ 3. Oate Checklist Suemit•.ea: 4. agency Requirinq theckiist: Z. na,ne of arcoasa i, i f Aopl ; cao ie: l4lrapeau r ines ti art,m ents 5. Vatur! and 3riei Description of cne roposal (incluaina 5uL 10 ~ limt{ed to its size, generai design elemencS. 3na otner factors that will give an accurate unaentanaing or its scope and nature): Apartment comnlex to DQ_ built in 2 phases. Phase one includes a total of 84 units in a 2 story series of structures. Phase Two will contain 88 identical units for a total of '172 units. , :.ocatien of Prooosai (describe :he ohysical settinq of r.ne °rooosal, as ~+ell as :ne excent or ;he tand area 3tr2C:ed 5y iny invirornnental 'moacts, tnCluafng any other infqrmation neeaed _o give in acC::rate inaer5t3nding ir cht environ- mentai Setting of the propo5al): Land slopes slightly to north. The area is vacant, flat with weeds and grasses , 3. Estimated Jace for Comviecion oT 'fle ?rooasal: 5/79 (Phase One) ~ist of all Permits. :.icenses or Government .4pproval5 ?eCuired `or Che Proeosai (fedorai, stata 3nd local - inc:udina rezones Countv Rezone, Countv Health Permit , l'oun,ty Build? nQ Permi t ( IF SPACE FOR EXPIAMATION IS INAOEQUATE. PI.F.lfSE ATTACN A-?OiTIOVAL PAGES. ) 10a. Oo you. or the owner in the evenc you Go not own the subjECt iand. have an}r olans fir future additions, ixpansion, or furtner actlvity relateQ *.o ar tonnetted w/th this aroposal? if /es, expiain: No lOb. Oo you a+n or have opcions on iand neardy or adjecent to thi; -,rooesal's lecation? If yes, exolain: NO 11. Do you knaw of 3ny plans by others including the owner which rtsay aftect the prooerty covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, exolain: No 12. Attach any other aopli,:ation fom that nas been comoleted regardine ttie prooosal; 4f none nas ~een comoleted. but 4s exoected to be filed at sane future dau . describa the nature or sucn appltcatian form: Application for zone change , II. "cNYIRONiMENTAL :MPACTS (£xolantticrs of all "yes" and "mapbe° inswers are requir!d) yes Mavbe '10 1. =arth. Will wM Froccsai result in: • (a) Unstable earth conditiarts or in cnanges ;n geologic strucw res? X (b) Disrupc'ons. dlsplacements, canaction or overcovering ot the soil? . . • • • • • X (c) Change in GopograGhy or greund surface relier features2 . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (d) 'he destructfon. :overing or moatficatfon of any unique 9eoloqic X or physicai fpatur*s? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ;ej any inc:'ease in wind or water erosion ur sails. either in or of1~ the site? _ X ~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPIANATION IS [NAOEGUATE, PtEASE aT?ACH AOOI'IONkL P:6E5.) (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beacn sands, or chanves in siltation, ~ , deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream X or the bed of the ocean or any bay, intet or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . . Exatanation: fhl Because of excavations for footinas and foundations, landscaping, etc. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Air earfssions or deterioratlon of ambient air quelfty? . . . - • • • • • • • _ IL (b) The creatfan of objettionable odon? . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • - I- (c) Alteration of a1r move+nent, naisture or teMeraturo, or any change in X cliaq ta. tither locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ - Explanatian: 3. water. ',ii11 the propasal result in: Yes Ma e no (a) Change in cw-rents, or the course or direction of wa ur movements. X in alther marine or trssh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Changes in abaorption rates. drainage patters, or the rate and X aioount of surfaca water runofi? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alterations to the course ar f1oM of tlood waters? • • • • • • • • • • • • - X (d) Change in ttle aaount of Surfate Mater in any water body? - X (e) Discharge fnto surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality. inctuding but not limited to temerature. dissalved X oxygen or turbi di ty? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waterst _ X (g) Change in the quantlty of gound waters, eigher through direct additlons or Nithdraaais. or throuqh interception of an X aqui fer by cuts ar sxcavations . . . • • • • • • • . • • • • • • . . - - (h) Oeterioration in ground waur quaiity, either throu9n direct injection, or throuqh che seeaage of leachate, pnosDates. • detrrgents, waterborne virus or bacteria. or other substances _ X i nto the 9oun0 waters 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (i) Reauction in the amourtt of water othen+iss availaole for public waur suppiies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Exolanacion: r (b) Because of buildings and parking areas, drainage systems will be installed in form of drywells and sPetic tanks 4, flora. 'a111 the proposai resuit in: Yes Maybe no (a) Change in the diversity o{ saecies, or nuaiber of any species of • flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microfiora and X aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of Lhe n wrben of any unique. rare or endangered soecies of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Intaroduction of ne++ species of flora into an area. or in a barrier to che nor+nal replenishment of existing species? X _ (d) Reduction in aCreaqe of any agricultural crop? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Expianation: (c) Entire site to be completely landscaped 5. Fauna. Wiil the proposai result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Chanqes in the dlversity of specles. or number of any saecies of fauna (birds. iand animals including reptiles, fish and X shellfish. benthic organisais, insects or microfauna)2 . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of che numoers of any unique. rare. or endanqered X- (c) soecies of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Intrcduction of new species of faura trtto an area, or result X in a barrie* to the n+igration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (d) Oeterioration of existing flsh or aildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Gxpianation: o. Yoise. Yes Maybe ~o (a) Will the proposal increase euisting noise levels? . . . • • • • • • • • • • _ -x - Expianation: Possibly in parking areas , i. Lipht and Glare. Yes Maybe !lo ( a ) Wi 11 the proposal produce new 1 i aht or gl are? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exclanation: Parking area only , 2 ~ ~ • - , 40 ~I t . IF cOR ;::<PLSNaT'ON i5 :yaOEQUATc. ?l.EASE ATT;,CH ONAL PAGES. ) 3. Land Use. 0 ves `~ayoe No (a) Wi11 the prooosal resuit in the siteracion of the oresent or ~ X planned ',and use of an area? . • . . • • • • • . • • • . - ~J~! A ~yo+anaticnl 9. Natural Resourtes. Wi11 the proposal result in: Yes !jvte ~ (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~ (b) Oepietion of jnv nonrnner+able natural eesource? . . . . . . . . . • • . • „ X_ Exalanation: 10. R1sk of Uose:. Does the prooosal involve a resk of an exolo5lcn or the Yes. ,"~avbe Vo retease of hazardous substances (including, bu: net ilmited ta, ail, pesticides. chemicais. or redlatien) tn the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ cxplanatiort: 11. Populatton. Yes Maybe No WiTl the prcpesal alter the location, distributlon, density, cr grvwth X rate of the himan Rapulation ot an areat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: Increase in number of housing units 12. -Housinq. Will the prooosal affect existing housing, or create a deniand fcr X additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • - Explanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Witl the oropoaal *esult fn: Yes Mavbe No (a) Generation of additienal vehicular movement? . . . . - . • • • • • • • • • X _ (b) Ef!ecu on existinq parking taciltties, or denanQ for new parkinql X _ (c) Imoact upon exitting transuortntion systenm? . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • ; X (d) Alterations to oresent patterns of circulation or movement X of peoole and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~%e) Alterations to wateroorne. rail or air craffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~ (f) :ncrease in trarfic hazards *.o :notor venicies. X ~icyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanation: (a) yes in Parkinq areas.(b) new parkina provided for apts. (f) because of increased traffic flow and parking 14. ?upiic Servicq .'~lill the aroROSaI nave an effect upon, ar result Ye_ :Mavoe Yo in a nee~ror new or altered governmental servtces in any of of tne following areas: ;a) Fire ?rotection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,Z( X {b) Potice arotection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ .X (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Parks or otrier recrtational facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) h!ain:enance of aublic Pacilities, including roadst . . . . . . . . . . . . . r?( X ~f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X cxp t ana ti on : 1cml~ (I9 SPACE FQR EXPLAMATiOfl IS INAD"tQUATc, PlEASE ATTACH r00ITIONAl aAGES.) 15. Enercy. .li 11 the aroaosal resul t in: 'fes Mawoe vo (a) Use vf suostantial amounts of fuel or enerqyt . . . • • - . • • • • • • • • L- (b) Oemand uoon existing souress of energy, or require x the deveiopmt of new zources of energy2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanation: 16. lltilities. Wilt the proposni result in i need for nt++ systems. Yes Mavbe va or alterattons :o the followina utitities: (a ) Pawer ar natura 1 qas 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - X (b) Cownunication systeas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (c ) uatar? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . „ X (d) Sewer or se0tic canks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -X _ (e) Starm wacer arainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x- 3 , (IF SPACc FOR EXPLANATION :5 :NaOEQUAiE. ?1Er15E AT'ACH AOOITONAL PA6E5.) (f) Solid waste and disposal2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Explanatian: _(d) seAtic tanks to be installed , Yes Maybe No 17. Hunaq t~ealth. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health haznMs . or p8tentia health hazard (excludlnq mental health)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X ~ Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. wiT1 the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal rtsult in the creation of an X aesthetfcally oftensive site open to public vie++t . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanatlon: 19. Recrcion. aill the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or " quan~{tity of existin recreational opportunitiesl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 X Exoianation: UZAMDlJ(J sAT / L'✓~ 1&40gE*S4e- /~71~V -L" • M. Archefliaaical/Historical. 'Ai?1 thc oroposal rtsult in an alteration of a Yes Naybe No signi#icant arcneoiogical or htstorical site. structure. object or building? ~ ExQlanatian: I I I. 5 I GIiATURE rhe unCersi9ned, swear under the aenaity of perjurI that Lhe above responses are made truthfuily and to the hest of my knowleCge. I also unden tana :haL. 5h0uld there be any wi11fu1 misreoresencation or -Millful 'ack of full disclasure on my part.Spokane County may withdraw any declaration af nonsionific nce t it might iss;~e in rellance upon this checklist. Oate: 7/12/78 ProPw+ent: PLESE & GROES E YC (PTtase Print or Type) aroponenc• PLESE & GROESBECK aaaress: North 909 Pines Road, Spokane pnone: 926-9555 Person comoleting Form• J. R. Sayler Phone: 926-9555 pate: 7/12/78 (GROESBECK & PASOLD, ARCHITECTS) Qepartment or Off1ce of Count/ Revie►ring rhecklts • l , ~ Staff t4ember(s) Reviewing Checkiist: ~ l / ~ 4 ~ " = l 9 s ~ ~ . FORM G ZOIVING WORKSH'EET This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1. The sites legal description has been reviewed and approved by a licensed s urveyo r . 2. That the proposed development meets the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers and the County Utilities Department. 3. That the proposed development can be provided adequate water for domestic , commercial or industrial uses. An applicant is required to pr esent a copy of the proposed development plan to each of the above 'listed agencies for their review and determin3tion as to whether the proposal meets minimum State and County requirements. PART I- To be completed by Licensed Survevor. The legal description for Zone Reclassification ~ has been reviewed by me or under my supervision in accordance. Signed Date Sutveyor's Seal PART II - To be completed by Health District Health District req uirements for the proposed development have been satisfied . - Signed Date Comments: ^ s V J G t ; ~ I ~ Zoninq Worksheet (Continued) PART III - To be completed by Countv EnQineer Spokane County Engineers requirements for the proposed development have been satisfied. )d~L Si ed Da te Comments: e~ /G L ~«e--S S . 00, i- ~ I PART IV - To be completed by Spokane Countv Utilities Department Spokane County Utilities Department requirements for the proposed development have been satisfied. , Si ned Date . ~ Comments: el~ zi:5~ _ . ~ 45 74 . ~ ~ ~000, o /17,~~c • ~ 0 4 a PART V- To bd completed by Water Purvevor The proposed development is located within the district boundaries. We are able to supply this development with adequate water. Purveyor's Name Date Signed Title ~ Comments: SEE ATTACHED SHEET. -2- • 'i Zoninq Worksheet (Continued) PLANIVING DEPARTMENT REVIEW: A. An engineering report and plans for the proposed sewage system REQUIRED yES NO B. A storm drainage plan for the propo sal REQUIRED YES NO C. A Specific landscape plan REQUIRED YES NO D. Other Plan requirements or Comments: DAT E ZO NI NG A DMI NI S TRATO R DATE CURRENT PLANIVING ADMINISTRATOR -3- , ~ w ` BLAIR & BLAR ATTORNEYS ANG COUNSELLORS AT LAW NORTH 221 ARGONNE RD SPOKANE, WASHINGT'ON 99206 TELWHONE ($09) 928$960 JOHN E. BWIR. SR (1910-1951) BURCNANI 4 BLAIR ROBERT E BLAIR 1910-1971 BLAIR 6 GERRAUGHTY MELANIE S STEWART 1971.1978 - aoY KOEGEN (CAL ONLY) A u g u s t 29, 1978 oF couNSEL LEWIS H ORLAND To Whom It May Concern: The Irvin Water District No. 6 has an adequate supply of water and sufficient capacity to serve the property owned by Groesbeck & Pasold described as follows: Part of Lot 9, Block 7, Mirabou Ranch, and Lots 1 through 5, inclusive, Block 8, and that portion lying North of line drawn from point 22.7 feet South of the Northwest corner of Lot 9, Block 7, to east line of Lot 1, Block 8, at a point 667.4 feet South of the Northeast corner of said section. Part of the Northeast Quarter beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 9, thence South 637.4 feet, thence West 552.7 feet, thence North 637.4 feet, thence East 549.7 feet to point of beginning. Water Service would be subject to annexation and approval by the Spokane County Boundary Review Board. Si ncerely, Melanie S. Stewart Attorney for the District MSS/bis * AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss, CO UNTY OF SPOKANE ) being firs t duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of The United States of America and a resident of the State of Washingt n over the age of 18 years. That on the day of n t/emL-p , 19Ig , I personally deposited in the United States mail at -&Po rTG1 h 1`~ 6 rClv c 1~ with sufficient pos tage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, a s shown on the S pokane County Trea s urer' s record s as of the day of No Y.e..y" lter , 19?1~who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) foot periphery of the applicant's controlled property. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. . DATED this 7~ day of t-I 0 Ut ►'h ~-e~ , 1979 ~ t ea SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this 7' day of , 19 7~ . J~0 A Vd--l & Notary Public in and for th State of Washington, residing at Spokane. 1,31- APPLICATION NO. 7Q ~ ~ FORM F , ~ OFFICE OF TIRL 3POKANE COUNTY PLaNNING COMNISSIO N ]DA TE Tuly 18, 1978 , To Title Insurance Company From Z Spokane County Planning Department Sub ject Zone Change, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban Piease furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record of all pro4ertY located withfn 400 feet and the five nearest property owners of the property deircribed below: Also, please include all mortage and loan numbers with addrgsses, when possible, Ln order that proper notificatlon may be madea If there are no more than five owners wtthtn the 400 foot boundary, please bsrnish a Itst of tne owners and taxFay$rs of record for the five closest ownerships. Ir.completa or lileqible title compay llsts wfll not be accepted by this department. Thank you. (Property Description) Part of Lot 9, Block 7, Mirabeau Ranch and Lots 1 to 5, Block 8, ptn lyg north of line drawn from pt. 22 . 7' S of NW corner Lot 9, Block 7 to eas t line Lot 1, Block 8 at pofnt 667.4' south of NE corner of Section. Part of NE 1/4 beginning at NE corner of Section 9, thence S 637.4'; thence W 552.7'; thence IV 637.4'; thence East 549.7' to POB. All in Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44, E. W, M., Spokane County, Washington. (Plese and Groesbeck) North 909 Pines Road ' Spokane, WA 99206 (926-9555) r v ~1~, ~ 'l frL! / p~ J'~ !'~j " r ~ ~ , t~ '~,,..r .r w t ~ i ~ ~ r ~14 e y j ~ G' . i ~ Y t , ` Y~ ~ ~ ~ ~ y f ~4i. J1 ~ ~ 4 R~' SG ''f ~ - ~ y . ,~q d'. ' ' ~ ~ - ' • ~ (r~~~ . ~ ~ ~ ,~4 ~ ~ ~ ; y14 ~ ~ ~ i~~ ~A ( ~ .s ~ ~ ; ` + ~ ~ j# $ ~ - ' i ~ ~ ~ : , ~ ~ ~ ~ # _ + ~ ~ { . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' * .r ` ~ ~ ~~t e ~G ~ ~ „ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ t ~ i~ 1 F°~ . ~ " G,~r,~~'°f~tl J~ '~~~r' # ° ~ ~ ~ ~ E ~ Q ~t? _ _ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A ~ • _ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ + ~ f~ ~ ~ ~4~ ~ ~h 11 ! n ~ ~Y '1 . , ~ s dJ ~ ~ I 3 ~ ~ r • ~ + ~ . ~ ~ ~1~/' ~ ~ y~ , ~ ~ . ~I'~~ 4 ~ - ~ p'a ~ y . + i s ~ ~ ti~~ I ' 1 i 1 ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ 1• ~ + ~ , , R ~ ~ ~ ~ 'C 4. ~ ~ 4 " ~ ! /'~t ir~ . ` ~ . `L ~ ~ t ~ ,,,r 4 ~ 1l,~ w~' 1~~~ ~`r ,~l;r~'~~ ~ . , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~'j` t-~ ' ~ ~ • ' ' . ~ ~ ~ . ,G ~~`Y rF~" ` ~ ,r,.V..~=- ri- ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ / !`~~r~' ~o". 3 f ~ ~ t 1 ° b~ ~ ~ . 1 ~ •f , Z z , ~a' t ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * h~ o ~r~'~j 8 p ~ ~ :?r~`'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "r~~} ~ ~'t r i . ~ , . ~ , * '41~~ 1 ~ ~ + • ~ ~ +w~r yr }~i C ~i. ~i,` . r ~ r ~ ~ '1~ '~i~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ - ~ ~ w ! ~h + t . f ~ ` ~ ~ ~ F.r ~d ~~y ~ ~1~ ~ ~ ~v~` r(/~ ~ ~t/ y-~+ ~]sfJ~' t~~ ,-k. I ~ ~ „i!' ~ ~~I" . ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ 3~,~' , , , f~~~ , . ~ st ~ t~ ~t ~ ~ .F~~-~r ~ ~ ~J ~ , f ~ ~ R P~ S~ ` . y ~ . .i ~4 ~1 ►A ~~t ~ 5 ~ ~'1 ' r a ^ , 1 QF IdAT~~ ~~SO+Gl t2C k ~ t~J~~~e t~u~ ~-rr'i~~ ~ ~ ~ - . _ . 0 ioe t; t ~ ~ o ~A11~L v~ ~ v 0pc." 00 ~ a O 0 !~C) OC7 0 fj C! 00 00 ~ C~a 00~ ~Q 00 p 4 ~ 0~ ~ 0 060 0a0 ~ t~~, ~ 00 ' ~ GR00 d AVE~- 0 00 ~ v o o° o60 000 ~ ~~C~ V vc~ ~ 00v ~ v a ~ ~ 6oo n~► v Qtr Q4 000 D~ ~ p DC+o 60 - ~ . a~ . ?3 4 b ~ a ~ i►•~► 00 0 0 0 'A ~ 4 ~ ~ b0 ~ 0 00 p~D~ p~- 0 ~►~v~ 0o Q ~~p' • 'A ir4' ` ~ ~ • f ` ,r • 1 I 4~ t ' . ~ 4 1 ~~~-~t~~+- ~ . i~ I ' _ . , - . ~ ' ~ t • ~ ~ _ ~ ~ tT 0 L'~.'-- ~ ~ . ~ . . ~ - - . ~ . - ~ ~ - , = f ~ 1 ~ ~ ; , , ~ ' _ ~ _ , ,,s r ~ ~ , ~ . . . ~ ~ ~ i . , . ii LIST OF OWNERS AND PznSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPL:~,~ Y Spokane County Code Number: Owners and Persons within 400 feet Application is for a Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses consisting of this and the following IO pages has been Irepared from the latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct. aai~141 Signed by ~ A(dzj-z,&r-46 For ov r ' + (Title Company) Date. /1-~-- 7 LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS ADDITION PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) ' LOTS BLK ~ l.v p School Dist. 118 4-25-44 Pt SE1/4 of SE1/'; tieg :iU tt W ot 5h cor th iv T to pt 123.5 ft S of NP RR " --"--R7R tff-WT5(3-t t th N"7.65 o f t to S ly ln s d RR th S /.S deg L 1 min w a1g s a Rl_) T 655.3 ft ths to S ln of 5eL, C-fF1, a-rg---b ln t o PIISo (Parcel No. 04544-9022 Red) T I 2. p J. P Korn w~12103 E. Frederick Avo. MIR.ABEAU RANCH W 80 f t Li B1 . - 2) T Prud Ins 2- 0 74- 6 6 8 3. - C) W C Misterek 12025 E. Frederick Av~. MIRABEAU RANCH L2 B1 Prud Ins. 2-074-669 (Parcel No. 09541-01-03) jJ SCiII:o411e-1 019 L. i' 1~CiE,I LC~ rivEY . i•ili~iiiL~~i~ 1~iiii~,i1 L~ i~~ ~ T Prud Ins (Parce1 ?`?o. ~95!rl 1,~i ; j 5. ~ o Ronald E. Clark 1- - o -T P ac Na t Bk o f Was h 3051986 Li f Q= u-~-'j D; o , R 1 U T • i~ ; LAS`i' GKArdEE IN CHAIN tillUl'1'1vi: OF TITLE (0) AND anrP Rq`' T~~^ :PF7~~'r`1M T A YTNY-, `?'..Y 7.7 6. 0 Gary iv S zLoiie l"L' UU~ E eue- ric~~ 1-~A:~ClI L'D 131 ' (Parcel No. 09541101U6) 'T Farmers & Merc Bk C 1400 r , 7. p R L Everett ~'11~1i3~r~u iZ~1N~ri Ll tb:j (Yarcel 1Vo. U9541~U:i.i '~'T Grt Wes tern S& L 5817 0022 0 T 8, p Kenneth L Bush MIRABEAU RANCH Ll B3 (Parcel No. 0954110355) T Wash Mut Sav Bk 0130231323470 0 T 9. -p Earl N Mason 12012 E Frederick Ave MIRABEAU R.ANCH L4 B2 ~ t`Parcef--flo. T Comm Mtg 00020959 0 ~ T 10. 'p Gary R Peck 12018 E Frederick Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L3 B2 T Lomas & Net 02 46 29255 (Parcel No. 09541-0231) 0 T 11. - p E R Shulkin 12024 E Frederick Ave MI$ABEAU RANCH L2 B2 (Parcel No. 09541••0230) T Comm Mt2 00021046 0 12. ` u Dale S Robirts 12104 E Frederick Ave ~I1RABLAU R.AdyCH Ll iiL (Parcel No. 09541-0229) T Comm Mtg 00021042 0 T ~ ~ ~ ~ LAST VRANTEE 114 i;tiA1N OF TITLE (0) AND A. T,T,.': r.,, ~r rf---- PERSONS I'AYING TAX.ES ( `I 1 13. 1_. p Inland Asphalt MIRABEAU RANCH L8 B'-. ' (Yarcel 1Vo. U~541~-11~' j ~-T L F Mac Kenzie W 3231 Boone ~~722 0 14 0 Inland Asphal t MIKABEAU RANCH L7 B2 (parcel-7o. --T L F Mac Kenzie W 3231 Boone #722 0 T 15. ~ p Inland Asphalt MIRABEAU RANCH L6 B2 ~ (Parcef-No. L F Mac Kenzie W 3231 Boone #722 0 16. l v i i i L li ty l v l a I l (Parcel No. 0954110233) 11' Thomas L Bergland E 14813 Rich Ave 0 ~ T 17. Ted C Hoffman 11924 E Fairview Ave MIR.ABEAU RANCH Ll B6 r (Parcel No. 09541-0619) T Fid Mut Sav Bk 1 12 3744 6 0 T 18. 0' J Defrancesco 11923 E Grace Ave MIRABEAU RAN %4l Llf B6 - arcel No. 0636) ~ Pat De Francesco E 11923 Grace Ave (P 0 T 19. - p D 0 Brozovsky 12010 E Fairview Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L4 B7 (rarcel No. 09541-0740) T Bancshares Mq 1706227 0 T LAS`i' ukAr:TEE I14 CHA I;J OF TITLE (0) AND n r,r.,t,~., PERSONS F'AYING TAXES 20. ,0 D 0 Brozovsky MIRABEAU RANCH L3 B7 ' (Parcel No. 09541LO739) T Bancshares Mtg 1706227 ll I 21. - p Wm C Freiwald 12024 E Fairview Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L2 B7 (Parcel No. 09541-0738) T Bancshares Mt~ 1725433 0 T 22. p Wm C Freiwald MIRABEAU RANCH L1 B7 ~ (rarcel No. 09541.•07:31) T William C Freiwald E 12024 Fairview Ave 1 23. t=p Eugene E Lewis 12009 E Grace Ave MIRABEAU R.ANCH Al L5, ~ W / tt L b b/ (Yatcel Sherwood & Roberts 2420000 No. 09541-0772) 0 ~ T 24. -p T M Cunningham 12019 E Grace Ave MIR,ABEAU RANCH E 9 ft ' Lb & L/ hxc t b.i t 13/ T Fid Mut Sav Bk 3 2 8022 4 (Parcel No. 09541 0778) 0 T 25. ✓p Mike C Hathaway 12025 E Grace Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L8 Exc h Jj tt Zx h b.i tt Ot L/ Mike C Hathaway E 12025 Grace Ave B7 (Parcel No. 09.~41-0776) 0 T 26. p Robt E Gilbert MIRABEAU R.ANCH E51 ft of L8 L" ' Ly ri/ LXC t 4U LL dc hXC T Robert E Gilbert E 12107 Grace Ave ptn Lyg N of Ln d n from pt 22. ft S of ;w cor p L9 B7 to E ln of 1 B8 at pt 00/. 4 tt b r lvt r cor of Sec (Parce~ No. I -09 ' I . LAST GkAt':TEE IN Cr-tr1lN OF TITLE (0) AND A r) t',T'T", 77 (l. . T ~ T r~i^ C27 l~ ~GL V.LC.1 1`i L1111.~LC Y` 1'11~'1~~Lt1~ l~iv~L1 LJ L' Exc E 30 f t& E 4b f` T Grt Western S& L 008 58100119 L9 B7 Exc ptn lvR N of ln drn from pt 22 7 ft S p of NW cor L9 B7 tp E ln Ll B8 at pt 667.4 ft S of T NE cor of Sec (Pa~cel No. 09541-0857) 0 T 28. 0 G L Gockley MIR&BEAU R.ANCH L4 Exc .-~E 20 ft & E 30 ft of LS B8 T Sherwood & Roberts 2420000 Exc ptn lve N of ol decc ln - Beg at pt o W lr: p p,?. ,g ,:;~7 o f L 9 B 7 22.7 f t 1 v o i NW cor of sd lot ext to T J pt on E ln of Sec 9-25-44 667.4 ft Sly of N~ cor of 0 sd sec (Parcel N . 09541-0856) T 29. 0 Forrest C Frey MIRABEAU RANCH L3 exc E ~ lU ft - E 20 ft o:= L4 B8 T Forrest C Frey E 12205 Grace Ave Exc ptn 1yg No of ln drn ' from pt 22.7 ft S of NW p cor L9 B7 to E ln L1 , Blk 8 at pt 667.4 ft S pf T NE cor of sec (Pa:-cel No. Uy541-U853) 0 T 30. v6' Jack D Teigen Sr MIR.ABEAU RANCH L2 - E10 ft ot L:i B8 Exc p n lyg ,,,/T Bancshares Mtg 15 00911 N of ln drn from t 22.7 . ft S ot NW cor Ly B1 p to E ln Ll Blk 8 4t pt 661.4 tt ot NE co~ of sec T (Parcel No. 0954~1 0852) 0 T 31. _ p Henry F Vavra MIR.ABEAU RANCH Pt of L1 tsb Exc ptn lyg 1v cp t Ln T Henry F Vaura E 12213 Grace drn frm pt 22.7 ft S of ' Nw cor Ly h/ to E ln Ll p B8 at pt 667.4 ft S of lvt cor ot sec (Patcel No. T 09541-0847) . 1 I I . : LAS`I' GKANTEE iN CtiA iN A l)i)i'i 161 OF TITLE (0) AND j?T,r,rr','~- PE-~;-~,r;~- -rrIr - . , . , 32. Q J li T ~ i b e n ~i 1 kAt~ EAU i~C1-i L3 h1 U (Parcel No. 09541x1066) =T Seafirst Mtg Corp KP 14410-5 33. -p Joseph J Lund MIRABEAU RANCH L4 B10 (Parcel No. 09541-1065) Sherwood & Roberts 2420000 0 T l ~ ~ / ~ ~ . ~ - 1'/'^ . 34. vp Robert Anders~i_ (Parcel No. 0954111064) -T comm Mtg 00002894 35. 1.1-p Pat J Bonser 12104 E Grace Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L2 B10 ~ (parcef--No. ~ Bancshares Mtg 1505463 0 ~ T 36. p James D Porter 12110 E Grace Ave MIR.ABEAU RANCH L1 B10 - ('Parcef-No. .,/T Comm Mtg 00022277 0 T 37. ~p K L Henderson Jr MIRABEAU RANCH L5 B9 . (Parcel No. 09541- Uy56) .-T Sherwood & Roberts 2420000 0 T 38. p G A Deishl 12124 E Grace Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L4 B9 (Yarcel 1Vo. Uy541- Uy55) ~-T Sherwood & Roberts 2420000 0 rTt 1 1 LAS`I' GRAf•TEE IN CUA IfJ ti0]aI'1' 101: OF' TITLE (0) AND PFR"nPdS F A Y ING 39. p Norman R Smith 1~204 E Grace MIRABEAU RANCH L3 B9 - i rTl J:1 ~-'-"~-*~-~7-,- ~ I- c~ I~ L' E' 1 ~ (1 . J J`-t r , T'Pac lst Fdd S& L Spo 13 9 143193 7 0 40. ~ Wm T Odom 12212 E Grace MIRABEAU kANCH L2 By ~ CParcef--No. 5 SeafZrsfi Mt~T Corn. KP 1_7588 SjJ 41. ~ Jack D Teigen MIRABEAU R.ANCH Ll B9 arcei-I~'io . . . . ~ _ . . , _ . . . _ 42. ~ S L Tenizail'L 12~~1 EBuclceye Ave ~iIRr1BEAL' RATvCli L_ Y~~ - . ~ Ra.inier Mtg 303 5 000044 S 0 ! T 43. L- p J W Spooner 12213 E Buckeye Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L9 B9 (Parcet Na . a9541-8968 ~ Rainier Mtg L 303 5 000042 0 T 44. -0 P E Arthur et al 12205 E Buckeye Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L8 B9 T Sec Pac Mtg Corp. 020978 n 45. `0 Thomas J Boyer 12123 E Buckeye Ave MIRABEAU RANCH L7 Bc,? (Parcel No. 09541-0958) L,T Bancshares Mtg 1513572 0 T ~ I I LASq' GRANTEE IN CH11IN AUI) I`l'10fi OF TITI,E (0) AND ADDRESS LO`~': BLK PERSOTIS F AYING T':'IYFS (`T' . 46. p Ragina D. Joiies , 12115 E Buckeye Ave MIRABEAU RANCH 6 B9 ✓ - (Parcel No. 09541~-0957) T Regina Dianne Jones 12115 E. Buckeye Ave. 0 T 47. p P& R Dimico ~12 y MIRABEAU RANCH Ll B10 (Parcef-No. M4111071) -r Columbia Servi.ce 90593 0 T 48. p A D Alexander MIR.ABEAU RANCH L9 B10 ~T Spo Mtg 0005600 (Parcel No. 09541 1070) -0 1 49. ~0 Richard L Hiett 1_2025 E Buckeve Ave (Parcel No. 09541 1069) S ~ ~ n r r 0n Pg F, 3 7 T 50. - o, Robert E Dahlke 12019 E Buckeve Ave MIRABE_AU (Parcel No. 09541 1068) 'r Bancshares r1t,2 Robert E Dahllce ~ Sl. o Walter 1f liooth 10 'S 4='+ E 30 R of. 6~.~ R of N 531/3 R of NW1/4 T W H Booth E 12500 Euclid Ave of NWl /4 & N 26 the W 30 R(Parce No. 0 10542-9008) 52. Ella N Smith , 10 25 44 pt of NW /4 of Harold E Smith N 5204 Post St ~1/4 - Beg 26 21 R S T of NW COR TH E 4911 ft th S 88 ft th W 495 t th 0 N 88 ft to POB (P rcel No. 10542-9009) T ~ ~ - ~ 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ t Gn2~ ~ ~ ~ ~ LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS PERS ONS PA Y ING TA XES (T) 53. o Ella N Smith 10 25 44 pt of NW1/4 of ~ NWl/4 - Beg 528 f S of T Harold E Smith N 5204 Post St I NW cor th E 495 f th 9 t th 0 I N 352 ft to POBT x ~ Exemption Purp ose Only T I (Parcel No. AI054 -9040) 54. o Edna M Dutton : I 10 25 44 S 26 2/3 d of W 60 Rd of NW1/4 ~ T I Edna M Dutton ; 14 1723 Mansfield Ave NW1/4 & N 13 1/3r of titi' 60 rd of SWl/4 of NW1/4 0 (Parcel No. 10542 901 1) T 0 TI I I I 5 5 o Emp Pa I ~ 03 25 44 unplattedl ptn of ,p~ ~ Inland Empire Paper Co.IBox 686, Spokane, WA SW1/4 of SW1/4 S o NP Ry ~Co R SW or Sec v 3 th N alg Wl of S c sd 0 ln also beinR c/1 If Pines T Rd 822.6 ft th N65I deg 46 min E 32.9 ft MVL to inter of E r/w ln Rd 0 I& Slv R/W ln NP Rvfines sd pt being true POB th ont. T IN65deR 46min E alR Slv R/W ln of e tc ; s d P Ry o I 984.6ft th N73deg Omin E I alg s d NP ry 220 . 6 t th a-l- T R(A to sd R/W S16d R 40mii-~ I I E350ft th S73deg 2 min W3:) :0 f t th N16 dee 40min W29 2. 6-,L I th S65 deg 46min W8 7 f t t=~, T 1 + p t on E R/W ln Pin~ s R d th N43.8 f t M/ L to tru~- 0 I l POB & Exc anv Y w~ithin Beg 620 ft E oSW c~~~- Tj E170 ft th N155ft ~h W170ft th S155ft t P01: o I & Exc that ptn wit in tol desc parcel Beg a pt on TI W ln of sec3 822.6 t N of SW cor th N65deg 4 min 0 I E1017.5ft alg S1 I/W ln of NP ry th 073deg min T E220.6 ft alg sd R tid to true POB th cont N eg o , 20min E alg sd R/W 451.40 ft th S49deg 16min 169.93 ~f t th S69 deg 34min 544 f t , +th N16d 40 min Wl 8. 8ft true ~~B LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITIOI! OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRF~! ; PERS ONS PA Y I NG TA XES ( 7' ) 56. 0 J P Korn MIRABEAU RANCH E~'6.0/ ft ~ T John P Korn E 12103 Frederick Ave. Ll Bl (Parcel No. ~ 09541-0101) 57. o Inl Emp Paper Co. 04 25 44 PT of Sl/i of SE ~ T Inland Empire Paper Co. Box 686, Spokane 1/4 BEG at S1/4 co of Se WA -t-13 N 1 5 4 - 1; f t- -t- n 0, 1 tol-UP Ry Co. R/W th NEly alg Sl ~ n f R /GT 1917 $ f t th ~S187fJ' T th SO deg 5min E to S 1 o f Rej- t-h W t- n PO R 0 T 0 T 0 I T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 ~ T 0 0 T 0 - - - - - , Traiisimerica T Transamrica te Insueance Company TTitle Insurance Services i ~ ~ ~ . Plesae 11' Grosve ck NYO CE • N.909 Pine s Rd . Spokane, Washington 99206 • Atn : Jolin Saylor DATE: 11/6/78 L A ~ YOUR REFERENGE NUMBER: STATE I OFC. ' BR. ' G/L I ACGOUNT NUMBER I ORDER NUMBER 03 S 145 9 2 G- 95 5 5- 0 92 9 35 -M SELLER/BUYER/MORTGAGEE: SaylOT PREMIUM ~ - I 1 I i MISCELLANEOUS I Zonz Change 47 names @$1.00 p.,-.r name 47!00 SALES TAX I t» y-25-44 2 i 40 REVENUE STAMPS ~ I I TAX REGISTRATION I I I RECOROINGS ~ H OTHER ADVANGES ~ 1 ~ PLEASE SEND YOUR PAYMENT. TOGETHER ~ I WffH A COPY OF THIS INVOICE. TO THE ~ ABOVE ADDRE55. SEE REVERSE SIDE FOR ~ ADDRESS. TOTAL 49, 40 CUSTOMER COPY NOTE: MONTHLY STATEMENT IS NOT ITEMI2ED Forrt, W-70 Rev. ;i75 p a t. r x x ~ ~ ~ a 'k~ } . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ~ f ~vvv n . _ . 3. a i~z f W s s x e } ~ :f: E i ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 n b ~g: C' x m.