ZE-201-78
,
~ , t ' •
SPOI~1~'VE CQZ7iNTY PI.AUNING D~PARTMENT
Zone Reclassification Checklist
Ag,Alicant,.s NarUa AdcL.ss -TPlel2hone No_ A12plicant's ~
)IVOI---r ^~r"// 71leE-7 ~S ► 7 ,1416~~ll 40?
~ .
IiVITIALS
PRE-APPLICATION FEE, ($10 . 00) , RECEIPT NUMBER 81,'16
(date)
APPLICATION APPOINTMENT
(da te) (time)
PART Z
NGINEER' S SECTION MAP,
E
pov,
J;0' ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership,
ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION,
,
' ZONING WORKSHEET.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST,
PLOT PLANS (5 blackline) - (setbacks, road frontage, square footage, open space) .
PLOT PLAN TO GRAPHICS
(date)
PHOTOS (8 x 10 and description) .
SIGNS (4' x 4' )
APPLICATIDN FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER
~ . (date)
TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS PART II
NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPES, ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT
(date)
STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
FINDINGS PREPARED
(date)
PO ST S URRO UNDING AREA (date)
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED (da te) NIaIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES
(date)
FINDINGS MAILED TO APPLICANT
(date),
.
PART TIL
HEARING EXAMINER COMVIITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED
DENIED
CONTINUED
MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT
(da te)
SEPA's NotinP of Actign
l ' 'ile No. ZE-201-78
SPOKANE COUNTY
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
FiNDiNGS AND ORDER
A. INTRODUCTION
This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on February 15, 1979,
and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane
Myers, and Ted McCoury and there being the following persons present who
wish ta request approvaf of a Zone Change; James A. Wolff for a Zone Change,
Agricultural Suburban to Local Business for the purpose of reai estate office.
B. FINDINGS OF FACT
1. That the existing land use in the area is generally residential and
veterinarian.
2. That the Comprehensive P{an designates this area as appropriate for
residential development.
3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is
Agricultural Suburban.
4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act)
have been complied with.
5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item
have been fulfil led .
6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula-
tion or intent of adopted policies.
7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within
the proposed Zone Classification.
8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area.
1
-ile No. ZE-201-78
9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval or
disapproval of the proposed use.
10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony
with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public
health, safety, and welfare.
C. ORDER
The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the
application of James A. Wolff for a Zone Change, Agricultural Suburban to Local
Business as described in the application should be approved.
Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion:
a. County Engineer's Office:
The County Eng4neer's Office has requested the following be considered if
the rezone is approved:
NOTE: All required improvements shall be built to meet or exceed
minimum County construction standards.
1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on 4th Road and a twenty (20) foot
radius on 4th and Pines for right-of-way.
2. Applicant shalf construct cement concrete curb sidewalk and pave to
ex i sti ng pavement on 4th.
3. Applicant shall construct five foot cement concrete sidewalk on Pines.
4. Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off-site drainage and access
plans before issuance of building permits.
5. Access permits and improvements to Pines must be approved by the
State Department of Transportation.
2
-±ile No. ZE-201-78
b. Spokane County Health District:
The applicant shall comply with rules and regulations of the Health District
in providing for adequate sewage disposal. All necessary Health District
permits shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance.
Approval of sewage disposal facilities by the Spokane County Health
District.
c. County Fire Marshal's Office: Fire District #1
Installation of fire hydrants to be in accordance with the requirements of
the Spokane County Fire Marshall.
Access and circulation plans for emergency vehicles to be approved prior to
building permit issuance.
d. Water Purveyor: N10DERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY
We are able to supply this proposal with adequate water.
e. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments
above.
f. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within
the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations
when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including,
but not limited to the following changes: Building location, building
materials, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted
zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane
County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans
shall be maintained.
g. A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance
bond shall be approved by the Caunty Zoning Administrator prior to
building permit issuance.
3
"ile No. ZE-201-78
h. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW
and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution #77-1392 be accomplished
by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Committee
Board, as instructed by the Planning Department staff.
i. I nterior driveways and parkrng areas shal I be paved.
j. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over
the property boundary.
k. That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a
review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of
non-significance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final
declaration of non-significance.
1. That bonds in lieu of construction of the sidewalk is acceptable.
Motion by: Mrs. Myers Seconded by: Mr. Thomas
Vote : 2 to 0
(Mr. McCoury excused himself because a possible conflict was present. )
HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE
Chairman
.
~ `
ATT EST :
FRED L. DAYHARSH
Planning Director
gy:
? P4 p 4
!f 1
STAFF ANALYSIS F'EBRUARY 15, 1979
ZE-201-78, AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO LOCAI, BUSINESS WOLFF
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
a. Zone Classification
1. North: Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1970
Local Business, established, 1978
2. West: Local Business, established, 1969
Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955
3. South: Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955
4. East: Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955
5. Southwest: Residential Office, established, 1969
6. Northwest: Local Business, established, 1969
b. Land Use
1. Site: Single Family Residence
2. North: Single Family Residence
3. West: Single Family Residence
4. South: Single Family Residence
5. East: Single Family Residence
6. Southwest: Veterinarian
7. Northwest: Offices
c. Development Plan
Property area: 22,000 sq. ft./5.1 acres
Existing building coverage: 1,800 sq. ft./8% coverage
Parking area (Spaces): Required - 6 Actual - 13
d. Regional Comprehensive Plan - 1968
The Plan Map has designated this area appropriate for Residential
development.
e. Compliance with SEPA:
The Planning Department staff has circulated a proposed declaration of
non-significance and received no comments from Agencies of Expertise,
therefore, a recommendation that a final declaration of non-significance
be issued.
I I. REVIEWING AGENCY COMKENTS :
a. County EnRineer's Office:
The County Engineer's Office has requested the following be considered if
the rezoae is approved:
NOTE: All required improvements shall be built to meet or exceed
minimum County construction standards.
(continued)
t ~ *
STAFF ANALYSIS FEBRUARY 15, 1979
ZE-201-78, AGRICULTURAI. SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS WOLFF
1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on 4th Road and a twenty (20) foot
radius on 4th and Pines for right-of-way.
2. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb sidewalk and pave to
existing pavement on 4th.
3. Applicant shall construct five foot cement concrete sidewalk on
Pines.
4. Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off-site drainage and
access plans before issuance of buildiag permits.
5. Access permits and improvements to Pines must be approved by the
State Department of Transportation.
b. §pokane County Health District:
The applicant shall comply with rules and regulatioas of the Health
District in providing for adequate sewage disposal. Al1 necessary Health
District permits shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance.
Approval of sewage disposal facilities by the Spokane County Health
District.
c. County Fire Marshal's Office: Fire District #1
Installation of fire hydrants to be in accordance with the requirements
of the Spokane County Fire Marshall.
Access and circulation plans for emergency vehicles to be approved prior
to building permit issuance.
d. Water Purveyor: MODERN EI,ECTRIC WATER COMPANY
We are able to supply this proposal with adequate water.
III. CONDITIONS
If the Zoning Hearing Examiner approves this request, the following conditions
should be considered:
a. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments
above.
b. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance
within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor
variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted,
including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location,
building materials, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the
permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in
the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the
development plans shall be maintained.
(continued)
y ,
STAFF ANALYSIS FEBRUARY 15, 1979
ZE-201-78, AGRICUI,TURAI, SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS WOLFF
c. A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance
bond shall be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prior to
building permit issuance.
d. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW
and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution #77-1392 be accom-
plished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the
Committee Board, as instructed by the Planning Department staff.
e. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved.
f. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend
over the property boundary.
/
- =ILE #zc - ao1- Z$
k . . ~s. 4-a .
~ , a Y v~° ~ F
„ i
THRESFiOLD OETERMINATION
~.p...C ,..~~...~•7.0~![
OECLARATION QF
(Qraposed/final)
No A I Ft
(siyn~fiicance nonsignifi:ance
1. Descrf ptf on of Pronosa i: L,ASAi fi1CjV[lQA) ro-ItO
/V U,s,--
2. Proponent:
3. Contazt Person: AmokWAwa Phone:1i~~
4. Caurtty Action (s) Requested: -V00"'Zone Changp; ?relimtnary Plat
Aooroval: Final Plat Hpnroval; f.hange of Ccndition
Otfier:
S. E-ocatjan of ?ropOShc.SC2 LMA 106 9-5-,WT A-ZA 1=
6. leaa Ager,cy: SPOKANE COUNTY, 'AASH [NGTON
'his ropasai has been dete►zmned to nave a sioniffcant aaverse imQact on the enviranment. .an cIS :s
reauired under :?C.1 ~13.21C.4~(Z} (c). This dec,sten was mad2 aft2r review 5y Lhe County of a com-
o"Ieted enviranmentai checklist and other information oiA file with the lead agenzy.
1. Resoonsible Official:
Proposed Oeciaration• Finai Declaratton:
;Jame_ ^var.te
G 2Signatu~e~ Siarature-~~
P
T1 t l@~j T i CI 2( . Li aA.tnrn Ca.L.., r7bs-r o w E Y C.c~'~.s w...cJllR_t1
~
Oepartrnent-?P~..IArAJIV W6- Devartment
Oate~~t 7q
8. ror Declarations of Siqniffcance Only:
Oate of Exoected Oraft EIS Availaaii;ty (determined by RPSGansible Official)
Oate of issuance
Tn 3E r.OMpLEi ED 3Y RES?ONS i3LE uFFIC IAl .
a. 3rief r,escriptian and Tisting of th052 =nvironmentai imaacts ieading ;o sucn declaration•
o. 9rier eKOlanaticn of amat .rsasures, ir any, coula be taken av tne aopllcart to orevent or mitigate the
anvironmenta; impact of che arapasal fo :uch an extent :hzC :re resoonsibie officiai could consider e revtsea
oroaosai with a oossSble resuitinq declara[ion of nonsignific3ncE•
6
t~
1
STAT£ 0,~, •
STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
WASHINGTON
4 ~ X Office of Distnct Administrator
~C' ~ North 2714 Mayfair Street
`~y,~ 1889 ~oy~ Dyxy Lee Ray gox 5299, North Central Station
Governor Spokane, Washmgton 99205
R ECEIVED
0 5 1979
February 1, 1979
SPOKANE COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Fred Dayharsh
Spokane County Planning Department
W. 721 Jefferson
Spokane, Washington 99260
Attn: Jerry Litt
ZE-201-78
Agricultural Suburban to Local
Business, Wolff
Dear Mr. Dayharsh:
We have reviewed the ref erenced application for zone change.
Although the conversion of one residential dwelling into a real
estate off ice would have little direct impact on SR 27 (Pines
Road) at this time, the proponent should be advised of the fact
that our department is presently studying the feasibility of
expanding the capacity of this route. In so doing it may be
necessary to construct added lanes and possibly acquire access
- control along the right of caay limits.
In addition, we would point out that any new access points tahich
1Ir. Wolff might consider at this place of business would even
now have to be permitted by this office.
ry truly yours,
~
TER R. HORNING, P.E
District Administrato
WRH:mb
cc: RREanrest
JEManton
. Record Control
o.~Q 3
GONE CHANGES POSTED ON ZONING MAPS
Application No, Z(t-Z,0j •-71 Re s. No. Re s. Date ~d
~-1 .'j From: 144•, ic 06 To: 03
Posted By: Date Posted:
Acres: Sec. Two, a?Cffi~ Range f'~
EAST
(Wail Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000'
Ole (1Na11 Map) FrUnt Office Scale: 1" - 1000'
t&v0"*
(Wall Map) idd Office Scale: 1„ - 1000,
~ (Section Maps) Front Qffice Scale: 1" - 400'
~
(File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000'
(File Map) Mefiro i~11 (Director's Office) Scale: 1' - 2000'
/VA- (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile
N~ (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles
_y(Score Card) Middle Office
SOUTH EAST
(Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000'
lW a' 1 Map) Fronr )fflc~ Scale - 1000'
('A ill Map) Middlf-~ ~.~ffice Scale: 1" - 1000'
(Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1"- 400'
(F, In Tvlap) Traclna 434 (Sot''h East Zoning Maps) Sca1P 1000
(Filc Map) Metrc, 411 (Directors Office) Sca1e: 1" - 2 000'
(F. -e Ma p) Counh,- Frant Office Scale: 1"- 1 mile
(Fi1P [viap) Count\ ,Man Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles
(,')c.ore Cards) Middle Office
.
~
~
Ac,EN(:Y ltE5Pc)NSE F'uFtM
DA1'~: U Z.- d _
,
Tu •
•
FkuM : Ndme:
Ticle:__ CJ.'s r c c. r v i'sc►~- "
o
A eiic : ~
g y f . Ec:n/oc~
~
SUIiJECT: 1.edJ Agency:_ r ALg -q.e.
ApN1 icanc :
- `I~- ~ -
Nroject : ~ _ c►r~7~t-~-~ 1c~ /v ~a~ ~ ,~c~~,
I t . ~
iAV~. KtV 1 k.WED .111E ANU :
Lnv.Ck. l.i5t, k'rop.-Final-Dec. oE 5lgnif. or Non Sign1E.. UE1S - H't:t5
WA'1'Ek QUALI'l'Y
A. Revlcw ~'ur ANNruval tteyuired
1. Septlc [ank W/17,500 C.P.U. ur SU ur wure srrvt~c!~
l. Mc:ciidnical ttydtem uc lagoon W/3500 G.P.D. ur lU or wure sUrv1L42S.
3. Cummrrcial or induetriel facillty.
4. NYUES Puriul [ requi re-d
5. 5tate Pern,i[ reyulred
d. ~.I.S. NreNarattoil Keclueb[ed
C. . t;.W. t. I'r`Nuci[lun lteyursted
U. Env 1 ronin4ntd l l:heckl lbt Krquested
E. Wate:r Qua1lty SII.anddt-ds Mudificatlun KCquireJ
ApNl icaiit 'l'o lir Notif iud F. ✓ No Cuiu~u~~~ ~ - - - -
G. V/ No ubjrct l.,n 401►
tl. UctallCJ (:unuuualts ALLucheJ
AIK QUALI'1'Y ( I n l;uuiit ies ut .Jttr Ibdiction) I
A. NOLlCe ul t:ullSLrucLluu Ftc:yulred
B. liuru [jib I'ernal t kLeyu f r<•,I
C. 11~-1.it1 c.l [',iii~n~►t :'1t t.i, l,!
5U1.E SI1laK(:l-. kI:J':'l ;f. 1 dt1.► [ t Litl )
A. t'ru_1ecL Wl(liln Aciuiter (kc:chargv 'Lonu)
ti. E1'A kev 1 ew AJ,pcurs Necessery
t'. t l•litli l~► 5L rc.,m tluw 'Z une
~ l'KEl'AltEn !i
'1' [TLk: • ~
S~-~•----
.2E9F
FoRM A
APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICr;TION
SP4KA NE CO UNT`_'
Date: December 6, 1978 Application No: ZE-201-78
Name of Applicant: James A. Wolff
Street Address of Applicant: S. 1227 Liberty Drive
City: Liberty Lake State: WA Telephone r;o. 255-9934
Existing Zoning Classificat-icn: Ac?ricultural Suburban
Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 5/31/55
Existing U se of Property: Vacant Single Family Res idence .
Proposed Zone Classification: I.oc:-il Businc-.ss
Proposed Use of ?rooerty: Real Estate O`f1C'P
Le--~escrl~;t~c;, ~ ,-~,f p-~~:?r . ty.. r~ 1I . _ f n r , r . }~~n' sL i~ ; ~ f. ~ f ~ 1
~~al L~ _ t
~
Section: 22 Township 25 N. Range: 44 , EWM
Source of Legal: Assessor's Information
Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 22542-0541 I
Prnperty Size: 23 , 200 sq, ft . ~
Total amount of adjoining land controlled ny this owner or spor.sor: Ndk~-°
Street Addres sof the Prope rty: S• 323 Po tl%-tS 2cp •
Who Holds Title to the P►_-operty:
If you do not ho3d title to tne property affected by this application, what is ycuc intere-st in it ? E~ t~t 4A 4 t +GL. Q & 4?A " 4 tu E34A evu,~" 4PP04G4A4U.
Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record,
their address, within 400 'Leet of the exterior bouncaries oi subject prcperty.
Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued)
ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE AIVSVVERED:
1. What are the changed con 'tions,, of the site and the area, which you feel ma.L-q
this proposal warranted? Pc1.v, CoiI(TSor" 6z?*2 y-tt% lv071k i 5 Vi
&';;Or4S ~ C 4Jl ~~,til r t'IC SS U~ ~ Q Q:~~
~ ~ ~ .
11~ ~ ~ Is ~o Co f~
~ jK~ .
2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification ha-ve on th.e adjacent properties ?
~ ~ ~ a,,,7 dix ~(e W~~ d,~(~ D~l~?U Muo
~
ftvt otAcc ~ s6a'u .
Wil"~ 5A~dAa1~ a, %l1 -4L extaa-b r
fa.c~- e~r ~~j4 ~va(~`~ ° *u"• ~e e~~s~~.~j(.a,~.~c~,~,d,9
(,o a~sc, ws ~i , ~ H,• ea .
3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be
secured under the existing zone clas sification ?(If no, why 60 •ike"
~jq r s b a ~D ou ~ ao a~u.p
cu
~ ~~C ~*14 v~¢c ~66bb
, ~
~
I. the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made
truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the
Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington.
(Signed)
~
(Date)
- ? -
~
/ .
FORM G ZONING WORKSHEET
Applicatton # ie 201- ?g
Thls document will provide the Planning Department 3taff wtth written veriflcatian
that:
1. The s ite's legai description Eias been reviewed by the Engineertng and
Planning Departments who agree that the legal description ls acceptable o
21 That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County
Health District, the County Engineer's, the County Utilities Department,
County Fire M?cshal and Watar Purveyor.
3, That adequate pcovislons for the proposed development can be provided ior.
residential, commerclal, industrial and mining uses.
An appl Lca nt i s requ tred to pre se nt a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN
with this worksheet to each of the llsted agencies for their review and determination
as to whether the proposal can maet mtnimum State, County and Health District
requlrements. (Note: Applicant should contact lndlcated aqencies tn sequence ltsted
below.)
PART I- To be completed by County Enqineer
A prellmtnary consultation meeting has been held wtth the Spokane County Enqineer's
Office and the proposed development has been revtewed.
/
1. State DQT Review requLred: yes no.
2. .i Acce s s to be l im tted to: .
30 Access permit is requiredo
40 . Ded Ication for right-of- way i s requ ired feet on Rd, Street,
Avenueo)
- -
5 o rr ~l Drairage Plan ts requlred o
--'on-stte
fff- s ite
~'?av ng pern1t ls requlred. = - feet on ~ e5?,tx4~~ Road.
6. ~ i )
7. L--Curb ls requtred, ( alonq Road, Street, Ave.)
8. y Sidewalk is requlred, (alonq '154' Road, Street, Avenue.)
9. _ dtus '~oot) ls required v(on ~-and Rr1, Stro,
~ r
Avenue)
10. Slope easement is requlred aleng .
11_ ~ Appltcant must be wlllinq to parttctpate En future L.?,D,/R.I,D.
s~
12. Legal descriptlon is acceptable as revtewed. Parcel No,
Comments:
,
~ ~ ~r~ ~ • - ~ r~
S t1P.d D3t8
~
~
Zoninq Worksheet (Contlnued)
PART II - To be completed by Spokane County Utilities Department
~
A prellminary consultation meetinq has been held with the Spokane County Utilities
Department and the prooosed development plans Ezave been reviewed,
11 The propos ed developme nt Sis not located i n a publ tc s ewer s etvice area
operated and maf nta lned by Spokane County,
2 o A storm-dra inage plan ts,~' i-equ tred ior the proposal.
Comments:
ned Date
PART III - To be completed bv Water Purveyor
QES,DENGE 1;;! 3Z3 S. PIOES
A, Water SuppjY I
1. The pnoposed development is located withfn the ~oDwr LU4481",
di strict bou ndarie s.
2. Satisfactory agreement/arrangement has a~tbee made to serve this
proposal o
3. We are are not able to supply this development with adequate potable water,
40
*fa_1.lQ'Vxo
5. Vllater Purveyor is publlc, private communtty, private,
other: t~w co2-t,J ,
6. Water system !s/s notlunder State Utllities jurlsdictton o
~ t4-~ MA~~ I W ~ i k>E S QD
& 7. Indicatz size of main for hook up: incheso ~'th AVE
14" nnAiN oN APP61cArJT'S SIDE o-F sTKEE i
8 a Dtstance to main: feet.
' 12-cy-7'c;
H a To be completed bv Applicant '
11 Indtvidual water supply wlll be developed with/without fire protection
capabllit!es.
~
~ ~ .
Z onlnq Worksheet (Continued)
PA RT IV - To be completed b y F ire Mars ha 1
1. Proposal is located in Fire Distrlct # / .
2, Access and circulation for emergency vehicles [s requtred,
3. Fire flow is/ls not adequate for proposed development and is/is r.ct
required,
4. 4L''~ Ivlatn(s) need to I-e Inst3ll-d 1
5• /,r!'J,-r !y17.r.'ra:Zt~S) ."1(-r~d IG -;F L6. ~ Watnr Supply Cistern sha!1 be installed (of gallons)
7. Nearest fire hydrant is 1,56 feete
~
8. Driving distance to nearest fire statton ?
Comments: ~~c-~~~►~.., c~. ~ C~o rv~,cc,. Q~
. p~
7'
~
~
n t.L d Date
PART V- To be completed by Health District
A preliminary consultatfon meeting has been held wlth the Health Distrfct and the
proposed development plans have been reviewed.
I. The proposed provfsion of sawage treatment and disposal appears to be feaslble
and des irable at this time by the following means: ~septic tank; lagoon;
treat me nt pla nt; oth er,
Other methods considered were: ,
~
2, Air quality is/ s not concern with this proposal.
3. Ground water quality is/(rnot concern with this proposal o
4. Noise Is/ s no concern with this proposalo
5. Ltght ls s no 1~concerz wlth this proposalv I
6, Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans o
Comments:
~ .e.,.,
~
~--z~
- ~ -
Stgned TlatP
- ~ -
PRE-APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION
SPOKANE COUNTY
~
Date: Application No:
~ r
Name of Applicant: ~ ~w~ ~ w v
Street Address of Applicant: ~ • ~ ~~7 G G-e/v;l d v-Q
City: (6/ux State: Telephone No.
Existing Zoning Classification: f~jG1!,1 ~
Date Existing Zone Classification`Established:
vawa,"A S ~ P 0~ ~
Existing Use of Property: "t ~
~
Proposed Zone Classification: LocJ y~ cL,,,' vf~
2(ed Proposed Use of Property: C`,~ . 1 0
Le9al Description of Property:
~
Section: Townshipc--o ~ Range: _
~ Source of Legal: ~
~
Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement)
Praperty Size: °
• ' r~'
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BROADWAY CEIvTRE BUILDING N. 721 JE►FFERSON STREET
PHONE 456-2205
D~ k ° , `
Y•'``I, JA SPUKANE, WASHIIVGTON QQ26O
51'0KANL COunir CCuRT HO~SE
MEMORANDUM
C'D s,?o . c-b ..i.~ mA crH Otvr CP I)r--,?r. o FSIc.oLo&y -Qf~• bFF
TO : ,4ntmv: 0 A,;Iv%44+JvA6,urAL ~~L" PTIm,t); RNyS sTeJW'J(W-
Q D. S c~ M_ t,uA-MA co .
~lY'6 a~ :'~1~,t. ~5T1 c~'c s' D~ pT• o F~t' ~AN6 t~o ~R'r' oJ
~ Bo c) A) io,4 o-v R-c- t;
FROM: Spokane County Planning Department
North 721 Jefferson
Spokane, WA. 99260
(509) 456-2274
Atten t i on : S-:pmy uir-
REFERENCE: Lead agency Destination, Threshold Determination, Staff
Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which
are attached.
Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a
division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING
AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project:
-~o c LTAk,a, L4S 8 uIE (3 4A) -fia
l
~OLF1=
This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220.
Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be
an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) ) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE
(WAC 197-10-040 (3)
Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro-
vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was
issued on . '"a . Please respond, if appropriate, at your
earliest opportunity, ut no later than the public hearing scheduled for
FEa 1 . .
The subject proposal or action (IS, ) LOCATED WITHIN THE SPOKANE
VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER OR ANOTHER AREA OF POTENTIAL IMPACT TO THE
AQUIFER. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel
an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Eval-
uation (GWIE), pursuant to the Environmental Protection Agency's Sole
Source Designation or regulations pertaining to this designation, should
be prepared.
Enclosures
. i
_ F IL£
'4/y
- , ` ~ r•
( . . ~
- M1 1 x
~i• I I' Ill' ' S 1 • a~ 1
f
♦ ♦ ' 1 ^t
STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAT C--IECKLIST
- - -
SPOKaNC COUrTV GOUPT HOU3E
I. In accordance with the Spokane County Envfronmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10,
an Environmental Clzecklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent.
This check t and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed
bY the ~r~~l~ N T-
The following data briefly describes the proposal:
A. Action (s) Requested: -k Zone Change; Preliminary Plat _
Approval: Final Plat Approval; Change of Condition
O ther:
~
B. Description of Proposal: ~ v•~ ~ ~R=_ r_f us s~f/ c~,~'r~`-,. ~~~-rn
c w~ 'ti►^cc~ _ ~~~'~,c 'T~ ~ Gf~,.? ~ ~ S
;1~~I C.C ~ f te.
t-
~ r ~
C. Location of Proposal: ,~2~..r.
II. Review of Checklist:
A. Slight adve: se impacts are noted under the following questions :
(1) X Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy
(2) Air (9) Natural (16) Utilities
Resources
(3) ~ Water (10) Risk of (17) Human
Upset Health
(4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics
(5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Rec.
(6) Noise (13) Y Trans./ (20) Arch./
k Circ. Hist.
(7) Light & (14) Public (21) O ther
Glare Services
, r
B. Potentially signific~nt aciverse impacts are noted un3er the follvwing
que s tion s :
C. Discussion of irr.pacts ideiztified above:
III. Cor.clusyons and Recommencations:
Based on this staff review af the er_vironm-entaI checkiist, the staff:
A. ~ Concludes that cherE are no potentizlly slgnificant adverse impacts
and recommends/i-~s apropcs?d declaration of nonsigniiicance.
B. Concludas that *_herp- are nc pOL`ent7.aIl-y significant adverse jmnclLts
and, because of the nature of c'r1N~ proposal. recommeridsi issues a
final declaratior_ of nonsignific,:~nce s
C. Conciudes that potenuLially aigniftcant adverse impacts do exist and
reca~riy~e;~ds/iss~.:- a c~ecIara~ior of ;ic~:~i~ic cE.
IU . Staff inemuer( s) reva eviir.g check? i s ~
~ .
~
►
f~, • '~~''J
' •w ~ F i 1 e # 7~'r
` ' . 6' `J~-1
~ . y~ ENVIRdNMENTAI, CHECKLIST Sec. -Twp .-Rge , 2-
Intraduction: Thz State Environmental Poitcy Act of 1971, Chaoter 43.21C. RCLt, requfres all state and local governmental
agencies ta consider environmental vaiues both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also
rEauires that an Envirartmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions siqnificantly (and "adversely", as per
WAC 197-10) affectina the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to hiep the aqercies in-
volved de*_ermine whether or not a proposal is such a major action.
Please answer the `ollowing questions as compietely as you can with the informatian oresently availaole to you. Please answer
questions as "yes" or "mayoe" i`, in yaur opinion, even only slight fmpac:s wiil result. The revie+vers of the cneck?ist will
be aware of and concern :hecrtselves with the dearee of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary dhere 2xplanattions
of your answers are ^equired. or wnere you believe an explanation wouid be nelQful to gavernrrtent Cecisian-,mkers, include your
exolanation in the space provided, ar use aGditianal oaqes. if necessarv You should incluae references co any reports or
studies of whicn you are aware and whicn are relevant to che aaswers you provide. Complete answers tc tnese questions ncw wi11
help all agencies fnvoived with your proposal to undertake the reeuired environmental review without unnecessa rl Celay.
The following questtons apply to your totai proposal, not just La the license for which yau are currently applying or the pro-
posai far which aporoval is sought. Your answers snould include the impacts which will be caus2d by your prooosal when iL is
compieted. even thouqh comoletion may not accur untsi sametirtEe in the ruture. This wi11 aliaw all of the agencies wnicn will
be invoived to tomolete thetr Qnvironm2nta1 review norr, without duplic3ttng paoerwork in the future.
No application shall Se orocessed until the checlclist has been tomoletea and r?turned to the aporopriate County deparusent.
State laN r?QU1re5 exolanaLZOns for everv "ves" and "navbe" answer on the cnecklist. The per5on comoieting the form may be
requirea to proviae explanations far 'no`° answers, and in sorre cases, more decailed information to aid in a threshold
detersninati on .
NOTE. This is a standard form being used by ail sLate and iocal agencles in Lhe State of 'dashington for variaus types ar
proposals. `lany of Lhe questians may not aoaty ta your pr-ooosal. if a auestfon does not aopiy, just answer it 'na"
and contlnue an :o the next questzon.
:PJYIRONMENtAI CHECXI.ISi rOaM
1. BAC;CGROUNO
~Vart~e of Prooanent: j ~ ~ - W 0 u~ Phone Number ~ ~ 5 ~
1.
2. Address of ?roponent: 5 lvavze
3. Oate Checklist Suomitted: `
a. agency Requirinq Checklist: " name of Proposal, if applicabie• ,
6. Vazure and 3rief Oescription of the Pronosai (includina nut rtot limited co its size qeneraides'gn e~mentsQ d
other factors that v,ill give an accurate unaerstandinq of iLS scope anu nature): ~1a~ P~ ~JAC-g ~
a,~ C&N> r ~ Q~O~ 4~AW,,ae rt~, ~~~otP
pPJ~(CSo~, LVICA~%ro
~ ~ ~i
~o ~"X • ~ p~~ ~ ~ re~~?,,A ~o "
1. Location of Prooosai (descrioe *_he physical set*_1ng of tfie Prooosal, as 4ell as tre ?xtent of :he land area afaactea by
an snvironmental imoacts, Enclua~i~9 an other iniorniatson ne to give 3p dCCUrat u aerst n ing of `he znviMn-
crtentai settirtg of the p►roposal): C~~li~ ~;~!~P~~~ a.~t ~~i g~ ~ ~ ~C~~'9i,2~,~ ^ . ~ ~
U ~
i~
3. _stimated 4ace for Comoietion of the Praposal:
9 list of all ?ermits, Licenses r Government Approvals Required ar che Proposarl (feaeral, state an lucai ; inc'uaina
re2ones v ~ ~~c.~
~
(tF SPaCE FOR EXPLaNATION IS INAOEQUATE. ?l.:ASc aTTACH AOOtTIONAI PaGES.)
10a. Oo you, or the owner in the event yau do not own the subiect land, have any plans tar `uture 3ddi*.ions, zr.pans:on, or
further actfvity related ro ar connec.ed with this praposal? if yes, eYpiain:
lOb. Do ;aou own or nave optians on land nearby or adjacent Lo this proposal's locat,on7 If yes, exoiain:
11 Qo vou lcnow of any olans by others inciudine the awner which may affect the proQerty covered by your proposal nr~ iana
aaj acent cr nearby? If yes, explain: c~d°?r~ ~~~~P~ 0~`,✓" .
. Q, ~12. Alttach any other aoplication `arrtt `hat has been cflmoleted reaardina the prooosal, if nane has beert comoleted, but is
expected ta be filed at some future aate, describe the nature ar sucri aRolication `arm:
fI. :NVIRONMEiVTAL (MPACiS
{Exolanatians of ali "yes" and "maybe" answers are require(i)
Yes ~~ayoe No
l. tarth. Will the prooosal result in: ~
(a) Unstable earth conoitions or in changes in gefllogic sLructuresl • ,
(b) Oisruptions, displacements, cmmaction or avercovering of the soil? . . ~ _
(c) Chan9e in taoography or grouna surface relief `eatures? . • ~ -
(d) 7he destruction, covering or modiftcation of any unsaue aealoaic ~
or physicsi features7 • • • • - /
(e) Any incre35e in wind ar water erasion of so11s, either on or off the sjte7
1
(IF SaACc" FOR cXPi,NATIOti IS ilr'ACEOUAiE, PLcASc" aTTACM AOOI; IOPIA~ ?,-GcS. )
(f) Changes in Qeposition or eresion of Deach sands, or chanves jr ,iltatson,
depositzon or erosion which may raodi`v Lhe channej c` 3 river cr streain ~
or the bed of Lhe oce3n or any bay, inle* ot lake?
`_xaianation: PaKt9 ?~0',~kQ~~ km V;a Y d,;llA d6vw.,~~ Ov~ (~ottcveva
` F)a I VONMW K16`\~ W► M ~ ~ . • ~
~ ~ ~ ~"~►-.~~s~~ ~ ~ ~ t~ c~~~~ o~ ~ ~ ~ ~~8
(U,)WAV- 9VM"~ AJA 4 'd
U 9
2. Air. Wi 11 the praposal resul tin: Yes Maybe .4c
{a} Air emissions or deterTOration of 3mhient air quaiity? . . . . . . . ~ ~
(b) The creatTOn of abjectlcnaole odors? . . . . . . . . . ~ ~
(c) Alteratian of air movement,moisture ar reiraerature, or any changp in Y ~ciimate. either locally or reqianail>> . . .
Expta^atian• A a
: ~~o.1~ ~t
~ c' w 1
q~'~i'~(, nu . 9
44Ag prv1~v o
3. Water Will trse proocsal resuit in• Yes t"avbe No
(a) Change in currents, or the course or dire:tion of water tnove+nents, ~
in eitfter marlne or frESh Narers7 . . . . . . . . ~
(b) Changes in absorvtion rates, drainace paLters, ar *he rate and ~
amount of surface water runoff' , . . . . , . , , , ,
(c) Alterations to the course or flow af fload waters? . ~
(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water buny7 . ` e~ _
(e) 715charge into surfate water, or in any alt2ration of surface -Nate^
Quaiyty, inc3udfng but not limited to temperature. dissolved
oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . , , ~
(f) Alteration of the directjon or rate oT fTow of ground wacsrs? ~ ~
(q) Change in ttie quantity of gound wacer;, eigher through dlrett
additions or withdrarvals, or *_hrough Trtterception vf an ~
aquifer by cuts or excavations' . . . .
(h) Detertoratlort in grnund water quality, either througn direct ~
injection, or through che seeaage of ieacnace, pnospaces,
detQrgents, water0orne virus or bacteriz, or other substances ~
into the gound watprs? . . . . . . , .
(1) Reduction in the amount of water r,chervise avaiiaoie r--r
oublic water supplles?
txo 1 ana ti on • ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ • .~~sR ~ ~~~b~~ 0~a6PA OTA 06t S70,f cY
~ ~
RAZA OAJ YWtVJe
3. FTora, 'diil Lhe prvposai resuit in• Yes Mevoe ~yo
(a) Chanqe in the dtvenity of soe:zes, 3r nuater of any species af ~
flora (irtcluding trees, shrubs, arass, craps, mzcrotlora and
aquatic plant5)? . . . . . , . , , , , , , .
(b) Reduction of the nwaers of any unique, r3T'e or enda:,aer?d ~
soecies of flora? . . . . . . . . . . t~
(c) Intraductson of new soecies or flora into an 3rea, or
in a barrier to the normal replenisnr-Pnt ot ersstinq spec7es? . . ,t/
(d) Reduction in acreaqe of any agricultural CT4p7 . . . . . .
E xalanation: ~ • 4-b aJ ~~oa~V-0~;~,y 5 A~4k
5. Fauna. ',liil the prnpasai resuit ln: Yes Mavbe Vo
(a) Changes in Lhe diversity of soecies, or numaer of 3nv species w `
of faana (btrds, iand antmals including repttleS, TiSh and
shellfish, ben thic organisms, insects ar micrcfauna)? . . . .
(b) Reduction of the numoers of any unique, rare, or endangerod ~ w
species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . ,
(c) Introduction of ne++ species uf faura inta an area, or result ~
in a barrier to the niyration or movement of fauna? .
(d) t?eterioration of existzrS `tsti nr wt3dltfe naoitat'
Exoianatton• 50ZLagl "~q 4-4~t% `
o. tlol se. YE5 Mayoe :40
(a) Wiil Lhe orooosal increase zxisting no7se leveis? . .
c~olanati on• ~a ~4t~AK VN➢LC;R-&
7. Liaht and Glare. Yes v3yb„ 4r,
(a) Wfil the proposal produca new liaht or 3'are7 . ~
~xolanatton al'/td o,~~
V ~~~i ~ir~ c~ V ~~i!~ ,~.9 • .
~
AW
J
( TIF SP, -:OR EXPLAfvATtON IS IiJADEQUATE, PLEASt ATT:.CH A0L JNAL P,4Gc5 )
3. lana Use. Yes ~Naybe No
(a) '~Jill *he proposai resuit in the 3iteration of the present or ~ ~
planned land use of an area? . . . . . . . .
Exo i anation :
J
(('~.~.1~acz,~ ~ ~G- ~ (w,~ G~ ~u~ `~o~Q > ~,-oc~.~~/I~, ~ ~~~Q~~ • r~~ ~ °
40
9. ~Vatural Resources. Will the propasai result in: Yes Mayoe .40
-
(a) (ncrease 1n the rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . _
(b) Oepletionof any nonrenewabie natural,resource? • . ~
rxplanation: AW4
6`IA~'
m4
lfl. Rfsk of iJoset. Ooes the oroposal involve a resk of an explasian or the Yes Mavbe No
release of nazardous substances (includfng, but not limited to, oil,
pesticides, cnemicals, or radiation) in the event or an accident or
uoset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • _ _
Exolanation:
il. Pooulation. Yes Mavoe Na
'aili the proposal alter the iocation, distribution, densfty, or groWth
rate of *_he human populatian of an area2
Explanation: ~
12. Housina.
Will the orooosal affect existinq housing, or create a dertwnd for
sdditionai noustng? . . . . . . ~
Exolanation• ~ d Pf~~~'~IA W d tI ~ a 3pv"'~L '~T~'~~~~`
~ u
13. Transoortatian/Circulation. Will the proposal result fn: Yes Mavbe No
(a) Generation of additional venicuiar• moveEnent? . . . • • • • • • ~
(b) Effet:s an existing parktng iacilities, or demand for new parking?
(c) Impact upon exisLing transoartation sy5tems? . • • • • • _
(d) Aiterations to present patterns of circulation or :novement ~
of ceople and/or goods? . . . . . . • • • • _
(e) Alterations to wateroarne, rail or atr trafric? . . , ~
(f) tncrease in traffic hazards to motor vehic{es,
bicyclists or pedestr3ans? . . . . • _ ~
cxoianation: II i~~.~,A~~ii,UZ. (~~-~n4~.u~~~~(~`?~Q~ o . ~c m ~~uG~~
~ y
ei--J~-
~
Wa~~ V4A e~taSA'q
14 ?uolit Services. Aill the oroposal have an effect upon, or result fes Kavoe Vo
in a need ror lew or aitered governmenLai services in any of
of the rollowinq areas. ~
o) Fire Protection? . . . . • • - _ -
{b) Police prrotsctson? • _
(c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . _
(d) Parlcs or other recreatzonal fatflities7 . . . . . . . . . . . . • _ ~
(e) MdtntenancE of pubiiC rdCilities, tncluding roads? . . . • • ~ -
~
(f) Other covernmental iervices? • • • • • • _
I
Qxplanation•
. ~ 4 .
(IF SPACE FOR EXPLt1NATiON :S iNAOEQUA?E, PtE4SE 4TTACH ADDItiONAI ?4GE5.)
15. Eneray Will the prooosal result in: 'les `lavbe Yo
(a) Use of suostantial 3mounts of fue3 or energy? • • _ ~
(b) Oemand uQan extsttnq sourtes of energy, or requtre ~
the deveiopmQnt of new sources or" energy? . _ -
Exolanation• ~i~~ ~~~,C~~.~~`,~"~~ `U'~ ~a 0~~~.tC~~~~-~~o~ ~o~~ rf~Dc~~~, (~'~~s?~
c~~SL~ Q 'o ~ ~ 4/1 ~
c~ I~~
~ o + r
.
o u
16. Uttiltities. 'dili the proposal result in a need for new syscems. Yes Mavae 1,40
or atterations :o r.he foilowina utilities.
(a) Power or naturai gas7 • • • • • ' ' - -
~
(b) Comnumcation SysLems? . • • • -
(c) Water7 . . . . . . - ~
(d) Sewer or seat,c canks? . • • • ~ -
(e) Storm -Nater drainage? • • • -
3
( iF SPACE t''J}i E.(PL:NAT:011 :S INAOEQI.'h?"c, =IEASE ATTACri 4001TONAL P4GES. }
Sal.d waste and Cisposei? . . . . . . ~
Exaianation. kDX_QZ.Fo c=d ~~'aoa.~~.e `Q✓~1~(~✓~ c~ ~~o~~° ~
- I~~~oiJO~.i'~-0 (~~c~ ~~~~3 (~_~.~.t-Adc~~!°~ii ~~c~'~r~ ~ • ~~~'~'t'~ c~~~~c~,vc~ ~ C~~°~d`~
~~~~s CU4, . "~~k K0 IPBA R Qb Y1, ~`~c~~~~Y1~ ~
Yes Maybe No
17, Hmran Health. Will the propcsal resutt in the creatiort or any heaith )zzards
or potential health nazar-d (exc.uding mntal nealth)7 . . . . . . . . . . ~ _
Ezolanatton:
18. Aestnettcs. WtTl the aroposal result in the obstruction 3f any Scenit vista or
view open to the public, er wili the croposai rnsu't zn the cMeatier of an ~
;esthetically offensive site open to puo,ic view? . . . . . . . . . . ~
Exolaration:
19 Recrea*_ion. 'dlii the proposal resuit in an iinqact uuon the Guality er ~
qt:antyty of existing rec-r,~~at:onai oFport~nities? . . . . . . . . -7~- ~
~ ro 1 a nat ion : P~5-c~ l`;~, 'If" ~~Z.i~4 n v t~~~`A 0 o✓li ~'r ~ Ss~a C~
20. Artneoloqical/Historical tJfTl :he oropo5al resuit in an 31Ceration of a Yes Mayce No
signjrfcant archeological or msto~r,i,ca~i~ site, structure, ob ect building?, . ~.r
Exoianation•
I I T. S IGNATURE
i, the undersigned, Swear uncer the pen3ttv or per,jurj *.1iac tne abovN *esoonses are m.ada truthfully and :o he
best of my <now i edge. i a i so understana thac, ihou i d there ce ar,y oi 3 i fi1 m15r°_cresentazion )r w» i 1 fu i'iack o'
full disc'losure on rry aart,Spokane tounty ntay withdraw any GeciaraLion cf ronsicnificance that it mCht ,ssue in
reliance uoon tht5 chetktist.
Oa te • ?»e pon e.^. t : -"4 Gla
(Pleas2 Pr1nL or Type) ,
rrQQVnent. 1 Il/~" V~4l~ v L' Wo W I1d4~dJs.
Ptione:
?erzan completing forn: QU 0fiARJ-1,% L'~,. . W(P tb "rhone: Date:
Ocpartrnent c+r Offic2 or Caunty Reviewing C:ieck?is?: ~~j d iu L
Stdtf ttemer(5) Revte+vtnq Checfciist:
~
• r.~. .
~ ! - -
_ . ~ ~ . : • ~ ~ ~ ~
• 1 % ~ ~ .1
1 t I ~ l • , r 3 . ~ -.it ~rM
1, ~ r.r.~M .
♦
_ • ' a . t" j'
----r____-
~
. ~ ! .
JQ._ - _L I♦%~ p t I' S 1y
i~ . _ - - ' ~ ` ~ 1
_ Nv~:' _ ~ ~ ~ ' ~ I • Ee~~ Vs~~~~ ~
~ ~
Vol •t
~ I s • ~ r' `
;c*ool ,
' ' ~ ■t ~ ~ t~lt.~.~ M~ ~ ~ s
t .1 r •
i
t s a Nf ~ ♦
~ ~ • • ' . . t
r ,y ' .
~ S • ~x .
~ •i«ar4a• .va ' t • t
..~...•r ~,4„
" ~ • t. ~?~~~-.y « ~ ~ ~ R ~ ~ .
_ 1 ~ t s i . « 1
-as ~ + ~ i ~ 1, ,•a ~ w ! y ~ ~
d ~ ~ ~ , ~ . - ~ r • .r----
~
y 44 t+1~ ~ . ~ .
"
w A: ~ ~u• ~ 9. ~~i' i- ~ ' ~
J~; _ - , t.~ ^ 1,, o ~i'. ;
r :
AL UM1N ~
~ IL L '
RpLLlNG
~~j ti ~r' 7'- • _~f* ~ ti
►r' ♦ P . - 4 fl ~ t i
~ . .
_ -1~ ` .r...•_♦ ~ e ~ ~ M,~oce
' - • ~ _
1 : •,f y ~ s ~ • _ _
~ ~ ~ , ,
~
.r. +~r • ~
_ yti .,4 , _ ~ t` • s• - ...r~ - ~ ~~ap[•
~
.r M1 ',oM
• ~ t _ ~
w ~ Av ~
. - t~~ `rA~~'~ _
" ~~~r. . _ ir it1 = •
, i ; , !
~ ` .
• 4 ~ . „ ` ~ {
I . '~v 1`~
:►_p ^iS ' L t t'`, J• I_
~ a aor~« ~ t - „~,__n
~ r r~
: ?i?. - . ~ . . . . ~ r t
i - ~
1 ` • • 1 1 ' ~ CJ . f
1
<< ,3 ~
~ H•. z~~ 1• _ ~ 4 3
i ~yp►D ♦1- • .
•,~~„•<< ~ ~ ' f "r r(,yM~
q ~ ~ .,r' . _ . ;r+CJ~ ±
_ ` : ~ , '•I ~ N,„ i ! 1
. ; 1 •
i . i • ~ -y, ~ . , t 1 •:.-+„x: . ' ~'kt.
_ .N4- s ~ ' . ~ ^ , f- . 13
. _ ` L~ t sf : i . , f
J'
1 1 -
' _ - c
- ~ ~ •~Iw~
ti r es -
i ,
t *
VERIFICATION OF
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING
STATE OF IrlASHINGTON )
) SSa
COUNTY OF SPOKANE )
_I i
41__ Y Bcing first duly sworn, deposes and says:
~
That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United
States, a resident of Spokane Cour,ty, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one
ye ar s o
Ttlat o
n 192-11 hc pcrsonally true
and correct copies of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the
following places in Spokane County, to-wzt:
1 0 /I16- ~ Q v. ~ ~ ~.e,~ ct-
~
2.
3.
Subscribed and sworn to me 1
, 9
r ~
NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPnKANE COUNTY, WASHIIvGlG J
Residing at Spokane, Washington
~ . .~a ..J a ~ ~
~ y ~ ~j . _ . . ~ ~~4 . r sr~ - - '
. ~
6 3 1 , u , s,y 3 ~ I ~ a. i 'r s
C3
j 6, ~ ; y , ~3' , , ~ i f, ~ ;a ~ i
f ~ • ~ . ~ ~ ~ A ~ w~ • t ~
~
~
t
, lr~ + ~ ~ ~ f • ~
6.2. ,I , _ ~ . „I
Na .
R , t 3Zb ~ ~ ' •+o y ~ _ ~ ( ! ( s
t~
s rE .
~ . .N . . WAH T ~ i C - -t
r . BI~I /S , t ~
°-t,t , ~ i ~ - " 9 ~ / } ~ ~ I ,
14 -~4 , ! - _ .1 `.,..f ~ ~ ~ ~
9 V 4
e,-
~
, t, ~ / ~ ' j ~ ' 0 , ~ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ m.... ,
WO ~ ^ , ~ 1 • \ f ~ 'Y ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ i {I'r ~ 1 {,.7 y ~ ~ ~ . _ , Y
~ D 1 '~f*,
O O - ' ~ I
,
~ ' ' ~ ~ 79 i,~ ' ~ ~t •o~ i!T . ~ + roD ~ bo 'vor
~ y
~
; ~ i ~F . ~ 1 F~ ~ { . , ~ ~ , , I i
P- ~ ~ , l I~- ~ , , , i I
r , . C~' , . / ~ • I ,
~ C
~ ~4`1
LC iAe qL ^ n _
►'F ~ . _ . _ _ r a _ . ~ _ , _ b m
.r ..r _ _0 L . ~ - - - - - - - - • - - - - - . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ d e
~ •oa
~ ' ' ' ~ _ ~
~ y , ( I l • ~ . I
~ . , <i • 1 , ~ ~ F- r , t.,, ~ ~ ~ ,
~ . . ; ~ ! ,
' P ~ ~ .i/ ~ , 1 ~ . 1~ ~ dNi , tw
q ; • J ~ t ' Ii + ' 4' ~ • .J
a • • , 1 • ~ I a; d , ~
~
, ► r• , ~ ( ~
a'1 x • ~ . i~.~-.. ° ~ ~ f .r ~ 1
. .I , ~
( • ' ~ i f ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~
~
~ ~ . . :~2.~7. ' • ! ~ . ~ ^ ~ ~~r e ~ , ~ ~
e.~
t~►~
~ . ~ E , ~ ~►p.9 0 ~ i ~
~ t S , , ► . ~ ;
b'`~~r `t$_.~ , _ '~l ~d . _i _ . i _ 6 ~ 6 ~ ~ i ~ e 6 d f r e
fi . ~ ~bl. . - - . ► - ~ _ l. t_. t a f
i ~ ~ ; r+~ r, ~ • . . . _ . _ ~
Ylf
~ ~ ti•~ ~ q~ ~ 3'b' ~ R`~r ~ ~ G le ~ ati5 ~ 6
1° t
' - „ ( ~ ~ ~ h ~~1~'.7 h l~" ,,►,i ! ~-o '
r ~ / ed / a ~ . ~ n, ~ ~ ~ ~
, p{ L. - o I . ~ i~ F
~ ~ ~ , . o , ',1
D
, u~'1HNN a
r;-bF