The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-210-78 y ~ . ~ ~ w, • 4 SPOKANE Cz,QtTNTY pLANIITING QLPARTMENT Zone Reclassification Checklist , Apolicant' G Na= Address TQlephone TVo _,Aj2plicant's ~ J 43013 6 f~rr . r 2L V •~~~V ~ / V F/~~I~~/~=~ / O5V 0 r7 ~ PRE-APPLICATION FEE, ($10 , 00) , RECEIPT NUMBER IM-4 , l~ (date APPLICATION APPOINTMENT (date) (time) PART I ENGINEER' S SECTION MlaP, ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership; ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION. ZOIVING WORKSHEET. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST, PLOT PLANS (S blackline) -(setbacks, road frontage, square footage, open space). PLOT PLAN TO GRAPHICS (date) PHOTOS (8 x 10 arid description) SIGNS (4' x 4) ~ APPLICATION FILING FEE(s) RECEIPT NUMBER 7 ~ h ~ I-Y ~ , , . . (date),, TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS PART zz NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPES, ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT (date) STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FINDINGS PREPARED (da te) POST SURROUNDING AREA (date) ~ AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED (date) ` MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGEIVCIES (date) FINDINGS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PART III HEARING EXAMINER COMMiTTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED , DENIED i CONTINUED MINUTES NIAILED TO APPLICANT (date) SEPA's Notice of Actign ' `ile Nv. ZE-210-78 L- • 1 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. I NTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on February 15, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane Myers, and Ted McCoury and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Robert J. Bethards for a Zone Change, Residential Office to Local Business for the purpose of retail business and professional office(s). B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is school, offices, church building, and apartments. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Residential Office. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisiops of adopted regula- tion or intent of adopted policies. 7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 1 ~ 'ile No. ZE-210-78 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval or disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and weffare. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Ken Redlin for a Zone Change, Residential Office to Local Business as described in the application should be approved. Special conditions or contingencies appl ied to motion : a. County Engineer's Office: The County Engineer's Office has requested the following be considered if the rezone is approved : NOTE: All required improvements shalf be built to meet or exceed minimum County construction standards. 1. Access permits and improvements to Pines must be approved by the State Department of Transportation. 2. Applicant shall construct five foot cement concrete sidewalk on Pines. 3. Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off-site drainage and access plans before issuance of buifding permits. b. Spokane County Health District: The applicant shall comply with rules and regulations of the Health District in providing for adequate sewage disposa{. All necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance. Approval of sewage disposal facilities by the Spokane County Health District. 2 w 'ile No. ZE-210-78 c. County Fire Marshal's Office: Fire District #1 Installation of fire hydrants to be in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Fire Marshall. Access and circulation plans for emergency vehicles to be approved prior to building permit issuance. d. Water Purveyor: MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY We are able to supply this proposal with adequate water. e. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments above. f. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, building materials, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. g. A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance bond shall be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prior to building permit issuance. h. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolution #77-1392 be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Committee Board, as instructed by the Planning Department staff. i. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. j. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 3 -"':iie No. ZE-210-78 k. That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a revfew of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-significance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance. Motion by: Mr. McCoury Seconded by: Mrs. Myers Vote: Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chai rman ATT EST : FREp L. DAYHARSH Planning Director B Y: 4 ~ j ♦ ~ STAFF ANALYSIS FEBRUARY 15, 1979 ZE-210-78, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO LOCAL BUSINESS REDLIN I. FINDINGS OF FACT a. Zone Classification 1. North: Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 2. West: Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 3. South: Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1970 4. East: Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1970 b. Land Use 1. Site: Office Building 2. North: Vacant lot and church building 3. West: Junior high school 4. South: Apartments and offices 5. East: Apartments and buildings c. Development Plan Property area: 36,231 sq. ft./.83 acres Proposed building coverage: 3,520 sq. ft./19.5% Existing building coverage: 3,520 sq. ft./19.5% Parking area (Spaces): Required - 35 Actual - 46 d. Regional Comprehensive Plan - 1968 The Plan Map has designated this area appropriate for residential development. e. Compliance with SEPA: The Planning Department staff has circulated a proposed declaration of non-significance and received no comments from Agencies of Expertise, therefore, a recommendation that a final declaration of non-significance be issued. I I. REVIEWING AGENCY COM`1ENTS : a. County Engineer's Office: The County Engineer's Office has requested the following be considered if the rezone is approved: NOTE: Al1 required improvements shall be built to meet or exceed minimum County construction standards. 1. Access permits and improvements to Pines must be approved by the State Department of Transportation. 2. Applicant shall construct five foot cement concrete sidewalk on Pines. (continued) ~ STAFF ANALYSIS FEBRUARY IS, 1979 ZE-210-78, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO LOCAL BUSINESS REDLIN 3. Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off-site drainage and access plans before issuance of building permits. b. ~pokane County Health District: The applicant shall comply with rules and regulations of the Health District in providing for adequate sewage disposal. All necessary Health District permits shall be obtained prior to building permit issuance. Approval of sewage disposal facilities by the Spokane County Health District. c. County Fire Marshal's Office: Fire District #1 Installation of fire hydrants to be in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Fire Marshall. Access and circulation plans for emergency vehicles to be approved prior to building permit issuance. d. Water Purveyor: MODERN ELECTRIC WATER COMPANY We are able to supply this proposal with adequate water. III. CONDITIONS If the Zoning Hearing Examiner approves this request, the following conditions should be considered: a. Compliance with all requests stated under Reviewing Agency Comments above. b. The applicant shall develop subject property generally ia accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following chaages: Building location, building materials, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. Al1 variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. c. A landscape plan showing specific detail and accompanied by a performance bond shall be approved by the County Zoning Administrator prior to building permit issuance. d. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21c.080 RCW and the Board of County Commissioner's Resolutioa #77-1392 be accom- plished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Committee Board, as instructed by the Planning Department staff. (continued) J STAFF ANALYSIS FEBRUARY 15, 1979 ZE-210-78, RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO LOCAI, BUSINESS REDLIN e. Interior driveways and parking areas shall be paved. f. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. f ~ w FILE ;?10"'749 TO L..• Q• ~ • - ~Enc.I M . ~ ~~~s►-~~ : - ' ~ T'riRESHOLD OETERMINATIdN - _r , , _ kO tF ~ aECLr1RATION- OF (prooos2a/final) l N IFlCA► MCC- (s gnificance/nonsiqni~icance) l. Description of Prooasal: 01C + " ~ AC.2E 0-F P20PC RT x F2oM 'fLF.S! D!g[yT'iA& oPnc 7'0 C.OCIM~(. 13USi NW . 2. Froponent: 4<1E~ 0 L.t IQ 3. Contact °erson: 304 QETmAgQ5 Phone: qSe ' oSSb 4. Caunc/ Action (s) Reyuested: ---It-/?one Change; ?reiiminari Olat Approval• rinal Plat Aporoval; Change of Condition ather• 5 ~ocation of Prooosai. OeqS`r Q ic -piNoEs RD 300 FEET $OuTH -OF 73Roq DwAY AVIF. ipJ Spo+CA" V tg"E y. ' S. lead Agercy: SPOKANE COUNTY. WASNING70N T~i-s proposai has been detemmned to _ nave a siemficanc a6verse imoact on ~he environrRent. .ln ~IS ,s required under RC'.~ 43.21C.0~0 S tc). This decision was ,rade aftar revie+v by the County ar a com- p ecea environmental checklist and oLher informatson oA fzia with the lead agency. 3. .°.esponsible Official: Prooosed ueclaration: r"inal Qeciaraticn: vame~~E 1D Dl~t+ Rgs f 4 5ignatu~'qt" Sianature ~ ~ . llA T i L 1 e C 7-0 jf~ T i t] Oepartment ?LAf1) N 1 N to leoartment Oatz ~ 2149~ ?ate "#9 < - 7 ~ 3. For Declarations of Significancs Only: / / Oate of Exoected Oraft EIS Availability (determined by Responsible Official) Oate of issuance TC 3E CDMPIETED 8Y RESPONSIBLF OFFICIAL. a. Brief oescriptjon and listinq of tti052 envjmnmentai irtroacts leadTng to such declaratlan: b. 3rief exoianaticn of wiat measures, st 3r+y, coula be :aken by che aopiicant cc arevent or Titigate the envirarnrentai inpact of Che prooosal :o such zn eatent =hat the respons1bte oiff;cial caula constder a revised oroposai with a :ossible resulzing ~Ieclaratior of nonszgn,ricance: ! L ~S ?1 ,zONE CHANGES POSTED ON ZG- ~NG MAPS, Application No. ~"r 210 -74 Re s. No. Re s. Date S f-~~-Q • From: R&O • To: 1+$ ° . Posted By:_ Date Posted: 71 Acres: Sec. r~ Two, 2,45' Range EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' (Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' (Wall Map) M ddvOffice Scale: 1" - 1000' (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' (File Map) Tracing #34 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' iVAr (File Map) Metro -011 (Director's Office) Scale: 1' - 2000' NA (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile /0# (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles OK (Score Card) Mlddle Office S4UTH EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' Map) Front )ff-,cP Scale• ' - 1000' ('vti i11 Map) Middlt-, Jffice Scale: - 1000' (Section Maps) F'ront Office Scale: 1"- 400' (F~ l~ Map) Tracina 434 (Soc~h East Zoning Maps) Sca1P- - 1000" _ (File Map) Metrc 411, (Directors Office) Scale : 1" - 2 000' (F.-e Map) Count~-rront Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile (File Map) Count% ;'.V1aD Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Cards) Middle Jffice F~ STAT~ oo~ ~ STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Q ~ WASHINGTON Qffice of Dismct Administrator North 2714 Mayfair Street `Yy,~ 1889 a0y Dixy Lee Ray Box 5299, North Central Station Covernor Spokane, Washington 99205 February 6, 1979 Fred Dayharsh Spokane County Planning Department Ns 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Attn: Jerry Litt 290 ZE=201-78 Residential Office to Local Business, Redlin Dear Mr. Dayharsh: We have reviewed the ref erenced application for zone change. Although the conversion of one residential ofFice into a local business would have little direct impact on SR 27 (Pines Road) at this time, the proponent should be advised of the fact that our department is presently studying the feasibility of ex- panding the capacity of this route. In so doing it may be necessary to construct added lanes and possibly acquire access control along the right of way limits. In addition, we would point out that any new access points which Mr. Redlin might consider at this place of business would even now have to be permitted by this office. e y truly yours, R. HORNING, P. . District Administr or 47RH : mb cc: RREarnest JEManton Record Control ~ . , ~ t SppKANE COUN~ j e~ 3 ~ ► - /70~ 7/ E A(;hN(:Y KE51'l)NSE FUIiM pATE : ~ `Z- o.$ 4- _ _ To ~ _ r ry L : . ~ - - FkuM: Naime: _ /o e r Ticla:_ _ U.' s Agency /o ~ ~ SUBJtGT: l.esJ Agency:- ~ . ~ .e ~ f oio ApNI lcant Project : S ~ 1 tiAVE KEV 1EWED '1'tiE ANU : Env.l:k. i.ist, Nrop.-Final-Dec. of 5lgnif. or Noa 6lgnif UEIS - h'E15 WA'1'Ek QUAL.1'1'Y A. Kevlrw h'ur Appruval Reyuirrd 1. 5ep[ !c tank W/17,500 G. P. D. or 50 or ouce rierviced _ I. Mc:ciianical aydtem or lagoon W/3500 G.P.D. or lU oc wure acurvf«b. 3. Conuacrcial ur induetriel facility. 4. NPUES t'c-rm l t requ i rcd 5. State Permlt rrquired b.--------h:. T. 5. !'reNara t ton Eteiluested C.G.W. 1, l'reNarat ion lteyurated U. Envlrui►uiuntdl (:Iiecklib[ Keques[rd E. Watc:r t1ua11ty ScanJdrds ModiFicatlun Keyuircd ApNI 1cat►t '1'u 1Sr Notif leJ F . Na (;umtueuL - - - ~ _ ~ . r L. f Nu ut) jcc c 1 on tl. Ueta I 1eJ (:011111icuts Al l.dclied Allt QUAl.l't'Y (In l:uui►tle5 uf JurlSd[ctiun) A. NULI~c ut l:uc►struc[Iuti Iteyulre:d ki. _ liurnlitb I'rciutt Kc:yulreJ C. Uet.Ai1eJ (:oiwuen[5 Al[ueIiucl SUI.E SUUk(;l: (l:t'A Deslbriat Iun) A. _ -Project Witliiii Ayultc:r (ltect►arge Zone) B. EPA Itc:v l.:w A1iNrarS Neceseary C. t'ruSr~C Wltl►ln Slrraintluw 'Lune e__~ t'KEl'Alt~'! 'I' I TLE; - ~io w ' SPOKANE COUNTY PLAN1vING COMMISSION Court House, apokane 1, iNashington APPLICATION FOR LOCAL BUSINESS OR COMMERdIAL ZONE PART I; Information to be furnished the Planning Commission with an application for a Zone Change to Local Business or Commercial. ' 1. Development Plan - a scale drawing of applicant's property and surrounding streets showing; a. Size, number, and type of proposed establishments; b. Off-street parking and loading areas proposed; c. Proposed access and egress points (curb cuts); and d. Landscaping, screening, or fencing proposed. 2. Econornic analysis indicating the need for the proposed development which is to include; a. Type and size (square feet of sales space) ot each establishment to be built within the area proposed to be coned; b. Number of spaces of off-street parking proposed; c. Estirnate of annual sales needed to support each establishment; d. Location of and distance from nearest competitive facilities; e. Estimated market area of establishments within area proposed to be zoned (indicate on a map showing the vicinity of proposed zone change); and f. If estimated market area includes competitive facilities, indicate percentage of sale s expected to be received by proposed facilaties. :s. Furnish a letter frorri a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. PART II: Date: Application 1Vo. ; ZE-210-78 iVame of Applicant: Ken Redlin Stre et Addre s s: E. 7622 Valley Way C ity: Spokane , State : WA Telephone Number; 9 2'-t ~0cq 2b Existing Zone Classification: Residential Office Date Existing Zone Classification Established: J ~ / Proposed Zone Classification; Local Business Proposed Use of Property; Retail Business and Professional Office(s) No. of Acres ~ a ' Legal Deseriptian of `Fr6perty; _ _ The West 150 feet of the South ha1f of the Sauth ha1.f and the West 150 feet of the South half of Che North half of the South half of Tract 84, Opportunity, according to plat recorded in Volur~~ ~~K" of Flats, Page 20, in Spokane Caunty, Washington. Section: 15 , Tvwnship: 25 N. Range; 44 ,E,W, E.W.M. Street Addres s af Prope rty: VVno HoIds Title to the Property. ~ ~t ~0~ If you do nat hoZd title to the property affected by this applica~ion, vwhat is your interest in it ; A SKETCH OF THE AREA PRDPOSED FOR A ~ONE RECLASSIFICATI~N MLTST BE ATTACHED VuITH THIS APPLICA,TION. THE SKETCH MUST BE ON A SCALE Or I " = -10D' . ilrTaps may be secured from the County Engineer's Office, Court House. ALL OF 'FHE FOLLQ'VvING QUES'~10i4S MUST EE AiNSWERED; 1, lrlvhat are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additianal zoning: ~ ~ 4mwq--'- P ~ 75UA 1 ~ ~ &w-evl Tor ~ ~ za~ - , 2, Vvhat facts justify the proposed zone reclassificatian based on the advancement vf the public he alth , safety} and general wel#are? ~~c. SPL-1t, . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~Pt" efLu ' f• ~ 62A Lenel 6a,VL-CT f 3. Vvhat effect will the proposed zvne reclassxfication have on the value and c]haracter o# adjacent property ; kk~ emtS u ~ tex I 6Lu "v~ 4LC , "15-11 ^ ~ . 4. Can a reasonable return from or reasonable use of the property in question be . secured under the existing zone classification? is -Ao 0(aAe Sc~me~ 6LL, HL~ ~ - ANY APPEAL FRO1Vi ACTION OF THE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MUST BE PRESENTED IN VvRITING TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS V1IITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATF OF PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION. ~ (Signed) ~ c'~~ ZONING 1NORKSHEET FORM C Appl ication This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Pianning Departments who agree that the legal descriptton is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for- the proposed development can be provided for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to present a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and deter- mination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District requirements. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence I i sted below.) ?A.H2_J_=~4_~g_~4Ln_R.~.~~.~~ b~L._~R414.a11~. Ef19!lxgC A preiiminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: 7y~_5 yes no. 2) UAccess to be limited to: . 3) ;-Access permit is required. ~ 4) a. Dedication for right-of-way is required. ( feet on Road, Street, Avenue. } b. ~Radius ( foot) is required. (On and Road, Street, Avenue) c. L Slope easement is required along . 5) .~5 Drainage Plan is required. L__ on-site off-site. 6) 1"_Paving permit is required. ( feet on Road. ) 7) Curb is required, (along Road, Street, Avenue. ) 8) Sidewalk is required. (along.5" Road, Street, Avenue. ) 9) 4-~ Applicant must be wil Iing to participate in future L I D/R I D. 10} /"x-",Legal description is acceptable as reviewed. Parcel No. Comments : 5 ign Date t , - ZON I NG WORKSI-' - 77 --continued-2 PA.RI_J1~_~Q_~~_~QmRJg~~_~L A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County ~ Utilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development is/i located in a public sewer service area operated and maintained by SpoC!0_I~ arie CountY. 2) A storm drainage plan is/~ required for the proposal. Comments : Signec~` , Date ~ eAj3I"-111 ~wmp1-e l€d_by-.5aQ~a 0 2- s~ua~c_Mug r-P.~r_Ye'x Qr LOGATG1) 1 N -r li'- A GT" ~IB 4 ~ U 4 PP OETU O-1 ('r/ A. Water Supply ABouT -7ooNAvES OP 1) The proposed development is located with the Al SLEG. w4T4,P C a district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agreemen arrangemen has has na been made to serve this proposal. 3) We ~eare not able to supply this development with adequate potable wate 4) Ie-~o---~ttppt~r thi-s-- adequa a-wattr---f'0'r -4re--fbw . 5) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other: A)oN leoFl T GoRRDeJTj QA) , 6) Water system is ICS no under State Utilities jurisdiction. 7) I ndicate siZe of main for hook up: I(o so inches. Q19OU-r- 14 - w• oF kv P4 P. l.►IVG 1 v P I A)ES 8) Distance to main: feet. JA44...'t r <L-, W 8. to be completed by Applicant 1) Individual water supply will be developed with/without fire protection capabilities. Comments : Signed Date C. If proposal is outside the boLindaries of any water district, the State Department of Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to I application. 1) I/We have reviewed the proposal. I t appears to meet State requi re- ments for public water. Signed - D.S.H.S. • • ' ZONING 'vVORKSE -T--continued-3 PA3T IV - to be ticm~~eted_bk_Spokane_~.ount~_F+r~, Marshai ~ 1) Proposal is located in Fire District # 1. 2) 74 Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) ~ Fire flov~~ s%is not adequate for proposed development and; is is not requ i red . - 4) Main(s) need to be installed. 5) Hydrant(s) need to be installed. 6) Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gal;ons) 7) Nearest fire hydrant is feet. ~ ~ 8) Driving distance to nearest fire stati n is ~ 41 Comments:~ L ✓1~~:,~ -LL ~ • ~ ' ned Date ` P~F~T V _~,o k~e ~omp1g~~.c~_~y__$j?okane_Coy.nty_Healtl~_911tris-t_ A preliminaryi, consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development pians have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: }c. septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: , 2) Air quality is/ ( not a concern with this proposal . 3) Ground water qualit s; is not a concern with this propasal. , 4) Noise i Js not `a concern with this proposal. 5) Ligh1 is/is not a concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. , . _ Comments : cIL ?i Cr Q i_IT t r ~ ~ I Cr ~S lZ/ Signed ~ Date / ! RECE IV ate ig ~ ()"7 ~ ~ Received From jl_6joy s - . 9 DQllars ForC-= ~)VZ) "?--,Y AccOuNT HOW PAID SKNJLRL aMr OF I ~ CASH Accou'Ir ~ Mi. PAI£1 O"qf[~( r #L~~A M«h~E MOtiEY DUE B 1 y gKsoe - - FORM F 1 OFFICE OF Ta^ , SPOKANE COUNTY PiaNNING CONTIv.tISSIOAT DA T E December 18-, 1978 To Title Insurance Company From Z Spokane County Planning Department Subject Zone Change, Residential Office to Local Business 79 Please furnish a list of the owners and taxpayers of record of aIi pzopErty located , withfn 400 feet and the ffve nearest property owners of the p.roperty de:cribed . below: Also, please lnciude a!1 mortage and loan numbers with addresses, when posslble, ln order that proper notifi4arton may be made o If there are no mnre than flve owners within the 400 foot boundary, please furnLsh a list of tne oENners and taxpayers of record for the ftve closest ownerstiips. Ir.complete or lllegible Litie compay llsts will not be accepted by tfiis department. Thank you. (Praperty Description) The ZNest 150 feet of the South half of the South half and the West 150 feet of the South half of the North half of th e South half of Tract 84, Opportunity, in Section 15, Township 25 N., Range 44, E,W, M, , Spokane County, Washington. Ken Redlin . E , 7622 Valley Way Spokane, WA { ' I FORM D LIST OF QWNERS AND PL?SONS .YING TAXES ON PROPERTY Spokane Caunty Code Number: fE-214-78 Owners and Fersons within 400 feeto Application is fvr a Zone Change, ~bAadentia1 Office to I.ocal Rusiness , Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses consisting of this and the followir.g pages has been pxepared from the latest available ecords and is to the best of my knawleage correcte Signed by For t~Et~ C .~f'd;<~~ C~'~ ~'-z _ C~' (Title Company) Date : i ~ LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN - ADDITI4N OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS Lq~~ BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) I I 01 i T' ► i I Tj o~ ~ ► ~ Ti o, ! Tj F 0 ~ Ti . 0 T 0 T , 0 , . i Ti , 0 , ~ Ti , 4 , ~ i ` (Cofitinued on next page ) . LAST GRAN^lEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOfI`S BLK PERS ONS PA Y ING TA XES (T) p J.W. Sawyer 15543-0404 Opportunity B84 NI-2 of N-1-2 of - -R. 12324 roaaway o f-h ZS'~ ft o f-WT7 T J.W. Sawyer Spokane, WA 99216 Exc st. p Opp Christ Ch 15543-0405 Opportunity B84 W4 ft of N. 708 Pines Rd. E. 325 ft of W4/5 f N-2 of N~ T nDp C'hri st C'_hiirr_h qpnkanp_ WA 99206 ~',x,(- q,t ancj S~- n 5 Exc E 5 feet. 0 T C) 0-, Ni tc_hr-ork 1 554-i-(]41 4 3' ' T Orvan M. Hitchcock 1221 158th Ave SW o~ W 4/5 of N~ & N of N~ of _ S~ a t t 1PP w,A 9 S 1 h 6 nf B1 k S E x ~ - o rPral c~ T,_ Auq~Qr 1 5543-041 ~ O,~t~ortun~.tv__IU 50 ft 3's of N. 606 Pines Rd. Sl-, & S~,- of Nh of S Tr. 84 T C)hashi & AliQipx S= nkanP, WA 99?nti ~ 0 R& R Tnv 15543-0411 _Qpportilnity S35 of 5b~ & S~ T Fed Nat Mtg #1 46 781173 1 of N~,-'of S~,- Tr 84 xc W 150' ~ Anton R. Fischer 15543-1705 OpAOrtunitv N 90ft of W130.72 Anton R. Fischer N. 404 Pines Rd. feet of S~2- B 117 T appliape. WA 99206 0 John D. Colon ~ 15543-1706 Opportunitv pt of $117 E Bancshares Mtg E. 12315 Valley Way 115.72 ft of W 246,44 ft of T#1701999 Spokane, WA 99206 S'y, 0 Gottschalk Etal 15543-1707 Opportunity SWk ExW w246.44 E. 12925 22nd Ave. feet B 117 T Larrv L. Gottschalk Spokane, WA 99216 4 Chas W. Leonard 15543-1708 Opportunity W 1/5 c)f SEk B117 E. 12403 Valley way T Charles W. Leonard Spokane, WA 99216 4 Dennis Ashlock 15543-0412 Opportunity W70' ot N116' of 1525 Lilac Ln. E400' of N2- of N12- c)f W4/5 of T Dennis Ashlock Libertv Lake, WA 99019 B 84 0 Carl Heqe Etal 15543-0413 Opportunity pt of 4~84; N12 of W. 707 13th Ave. N32 of 114/5 Exc E32 Exc T Carl Heqe Spokane, WA 99204 W70' of E400' of N 16' & Exc St. _ 0 ~ T ~ 0 T I I ! . I LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION Or TITLE (0) AiJD ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYZNG TA;'.S (T ) 0 Harlan D. Douglass 16544-0153 Opportunity E. 314,29ft of E. 815 Rosewood Ave. N 110ft of Blk 85 txc N5' for T Harlan D. Douqlass Spokane, WA 99208 rd. 0 School Dist. 356 16544-0102 Opportunity pt of 85 Exc N 110ft also Ext S20ft i Exempt 0 Albert Armentino 16544-0244 Opportunity pt of k16 East 245.07ft ot N:~2- Exc N2Urt &Exc T A.J. ArmBntino S65.25ft of E326ft 0 James Kueknle 16544-0257 Opportunity pt B11~ N66.25 ft or rol aesc prop eg at pt on T J.P. Kuehnle E ln of Tr 116 257 56 ft N N of SE cor th W par witth S ln of sd tr :3 Z 6 tt Tith N par witn E in o sd `l+r to pt 65. 25ft n of S ln of N 2 of _ Tr 116 th E par S ln of N~ 326f~ to E ln of sd Tr th S on E in 129.64 ft to PUB. , ~ 0 Dorothy Finch- 16544-0258 OPportunity pt of L16 Beg at " c/o Bennett & P,ssoc. pt on- in oz 'l~r 1 ~ T North Pines Venture Box 14729 - 99214 ft N of SE cor th q par with S in ot sd Tr 326tt th Z1 par witn E 1n ot sct tr- to pt b~. zDrt N or`3 i''Yi uf-N~2- p of Tr 116 th E par with S ln of N~ 326ft to E ~n of Tr 116 th S on E ln 129.6E tt to PUB exc N bb.t5rt T -41 ~l 09 7 f'~ v t2G-~~ ~ T. B. Panther 6544-0250 Opportunity pt of ~116 Beg c/o Zennezr a ti5~u~• 257.56ft N of SE c r th W T Nn G ~T~' Box 14729 326 68 ft to pt 32~.67 ft E - rth p~ n.A nt»rr~ 5poxane, of W1 th S 128.78 t th E to 0 F1 h 28T78 ft Lo POB t . T 0 i 0 l 0 - 1 O I 1 I . L1 T i _ • ~ ~ PRE-APPLICATION F4R ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: Uc,vP,,nher 941 19 7 R Application No: IVame of Applicant: Ken Redlin Street Address of Applicant: E. 7622 Valleyway City: Spokane , State: IaA Telephone No. Existing Zoning Classification: Residential Office Date E;Cisting Zone Classification Established: . Existing Use of Property: Vacant and Professional Office (s) , Proposed Zone Classification: Local Business Proposed Use of Property• Retail Business and Professional Office (s) Legal Description of Property: ,~-~--":S tir- •-S~ ~ ~ ~ The West 150 feet of the South half of the South half and the West 150 feet of the South half of the North half of the South half of Tract 84, Opportunity, according to plat recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, Page 20, in Spokane County, Washington Section: 15 Townshilz 25 Range: 44 Source of Legal: First American Title Company , Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 15543-0410 Property Size: 150 X 242 ~ 12 \I ( PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILLING N. 72-1 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 a 904 SPOKANE, WASMINGTON Q0-260 SNUhANE COUrviv GOUqT nOVSE MEMORANDUM ~ Spo, co. .iiiom++► NEA4.TN Disr. CA;D 1). O.E . CACG. oFF) ~ n. S. N• S.( RE6 TO : ATTN; C Nu i20 NM£NTA(,. FtlEAG.TYI A-r7N: fZf.►yS STeizyMV ATTN: TONt WsTl CE Q MOUERN ELecT. %AJ wTFR CO. Q$ovNnARY ZEVW.w 134 ~j FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 3efferson Spokane, WA. 99260 (509) 456-2274 - Attention: )-ERt~~ ~ rr REFERENCE: Lead Agency Destination, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checkl ist, map; al1 or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Departxnent, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: 2E`s a, a-~~ 'Oef s . oAF,C E TI 4-0~AL- IBus„~ Tf- DL, I N This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) ) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on JFW 2'~ ~ . Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunlty, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for A~Z& i . The subject proposai or action (IS, Z~) LOCATED WITHIN THE SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER OR ANOTHER AREA OF POTENTIAL IMPACT TO THE AQUIFER. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Eval- uation (GWIE), pursuant to the Environmental Protection Agency's Sole Source Designation or regulations pertaining to this designation, should be prepared. Enclosures I ' F ILE I`E , • ` , . - - ' , STAFF REVIEW QF ENVIRONMENTAL• CHECKLIST . ~ 03 (L , . _ ; . - „ SPOKAMC COUPITV GOURT NOUSC I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental O►.,dinance 'and WAC 197-I0, an Environmental Ciiecklist has been submi.tted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the c- ' T The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action (s) Requested: X Zone Change; Preliminasy Plat _ Approval: Finai Plat Approval; C'nange of Conditfon O ther: B. Description of Proposal: j?4F5/~tXAlT~*-4 D`/c/Ct=-- ~ C, Location of Proposal: V-4w AF &A C'S cSM T id'o II. Review of Clnecklist: A. Slight adve:se impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) 4 Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) Air (9) Natural (16) -4 Utilities Resources (3) -,Y Water (10) Risk of (l7) Human Upset Health (4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Rec. (6) Noise (13) A Trans./ (20) Arch./ Circ. Hist, (7) ~ Light & (14) Y Public (.21; O ther G? are Services B. Potentially significant adverse {mpacts are noted under the following questions: C. Discussion of impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staif review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially si-gnificant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance, B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse imnacts and, because o-f the nature of tne proposal, recomm-ends/issues a fYnal dec'Laration a'L nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommend s/is-oues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff inember(s) revievriny checkl ;st ~ ► i , ~ File ; - ~y„ . , . S e c . -TwP .-Rg e .1~' ' ENVIRO(VMc-NTAI CHECKLI57 ~ ~,p...c ._~•i+:...r.ac.st Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. CNaoter 43.21C. RC'd, requires atl state and local governmental agencies to consider enviranmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private aroposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all ma,7or actions significantly (and "adversety", as per WAC 197-10) affectino ihe quality of the pnysical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to hlep :he agencies Sn- volved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questians as compietely as you can with the informattan presently available ta you. Please answer Guestfons as "yes" or "maybe" i`, in your opinfon, even anly slight srtpacts wi11 result. the reviewers af the checklist will be aware of and concern :hemselves with the deQree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. :lhere exptanations of your answers are reauired, or where you believe an exolanation wouid be helpful to qovernment decision-iiakers, include your explanation in the space provided, ar use additional oaces, if necessarv You snould inciude references co any reports or studies of whicn you are aware and which are rslevant to the aoswers you proviae. Campiete answers to these question s ncw will help all agencies invoived with yaur propasal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary deiay. The foilowing questions ipviy to your total proposai, not just ta the licens2 for which you are currently aoplying or the pro- aosal for wnich appraval is sou9ht. Yaur answers snoula znclude the fmpacts which ++ill be caused by your prooosal when it is cocrQleted, even though comoletlon may not occur untii sometime in *.he future. This will ailow all of the agencies which will be involved to comple*_e their environmental review naw. without dupliCdting paoerwork in the future. No applicatfon shall be processed until the checkllst has been comaleted and returned *.o the aQpropriate County deparvnent. State law reculre5 exolanations `or every "yes" and "mavbe" answer on the cneckiist. The persan comoletinq che form may be requirea to proviae expianations for "no" answers, and in same cases, more detailea information to ald in a threshold determination. NOTE. This is a standard form being used by al1 state and local agencies in the State of Washington for variaus types of proposals. Kany of the questions may not apply to your praposai. if a auestyon does not appiy, just answer it 'rto" and continue on Lo the next question. ENYIRONME14TAL CHECKlISi FORM i SACXGROUNO i. Nartse of Propanenc: r-,e44- _V-e_~ L✓l ?hone Number 2. Address of Proponent: 1~..22, V~.~w2-"1 3. Oate Checklist Suomitted: - ~ ' 4. Agency Requiring Checki i sc: 1'I eA_Vz.vk!;~ , 5 Name of Pmposai, if ApQiicaoie: ' b. Aacure and 3rief Oescriptfon of che Proposal (inCludina 5ut not iimited Lo its size, generai cessgn elements. and other °actors Lhat wili give an acc rate understanaing or its scope znd nature): _ 1. Location of Propasai (describe Che physical setttng of the °rooosal, as well as tne extent or the land area af`acted by any environmentai zmpacts, incluaing a och rinrg~ tzor},neeaed CQ~ ive n acc:,rate u~T e-~ a-nding ~ofI ~the en ron- rtientai 5 tting of the proposai ~aS c~k- t`~ L 3. clstimated Oate for Cocnpietion or Lhe Proposal: i9 8~ 9. Ltist of all ?ermits, !icenses or Government Approvais Reauired `or the Praposal (federai, sLate and locai - inc!udlna rezones ) ge-D (IF SPACE rdR cXPIAHAiION IS [NAOEQUATE. Ot.EASE aTT,;CN a00ITIOtaAl PAGcS.) 10a. Qo you, or the owner in *.he event you Go not awn the subject land, have any ptans ror ,`uture addttions. 2xpanslan, or further activlty related *.o or connected with this proposal? if yes. expiain: ~ lOb. Uo you awn or have optfons on land_nearby or adjacent to t is proposal's loTtion? If yes, exolain: ~jL1Q , ~ r V r u V 11. Oo you knaw of any plans by others incluatna the uwner whicn may affect the property covered by your arooosai or tand adjacent or nearby? (f yes, explain• ~ 12. Attach any other aaplication form that has been comoleted reeardina the prooosal, if none has t.,een como3eted. Sut is expected to be Piled at some future aate, descrlbe the nature of sucn apolicatian form: 5w. (I. cNVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Ezplanatians af ail "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Mavbe No l. earch. will the proposat rESUIt jn: (a) Unstable earth conditians ar in changes ;n geologic structures? _ x (b) JiSruotians, d15p1acerFents, comaaction or overcovering of the soil? . _ (c) Chanqe in tapography or grauna surface relief `eatures2 • • • _ _,,o` - (d) +he destruction, covering Qr m.odiflcation of any um aue geologic X or physical i?atures? . . . . • • • • • • • • - (e) Any increase in wind ar water ervsion or soils, 2ither on or off the si:e? ~ 1 { IF SpACC FOR ti(PLAN1iT.4ti IS INROEQIlhTc, P! EASE ATTACH ,:DO('t0?IkL P;GcS. ) (f) Chanqes ir, deposition or erosion of bAath sanns, or thanaes in siltation, depositien or el^o51on wm ch may modi f;i the channe 1 o f a ri ver er StT'°d1S1 ~ or the 5ed of che ncean or any bzy, irie*_ ar iake? . . • Exolanation: ~7C!~~CAv~S'~ ~ ~WICi ccY1S~~~' 1~ 2. Air. 'diiT tt;e propasz: rasu3t in: tes MaZbe "to (a) Air emissions or detertoration of amcient air quaiity? • • • • . . • • (b) The creation of ob,ectionable odors^ . . . . . . _ ~ (c) Alteration of atr mvement, moisture er temperature, or any chanae in ~ ciimace, either lotaily or regionally7 _xolanation: 3. WatEr. Wi 11 Lhe prooosal resul t i n: Yes .Kaybe No (a) Change in current5, or the course or di-ection of water movemeAts, x in either marine or frESh waters? . . • • • • • - - (b) Changes tn absarptfon rates. crainaye patters, or the rate and x amount of ;urface water runot"? (c) Alterations *.o thE course or flo+v of flaod waters? • • ~ X (d) Chanqe in che amount of 5urface waLar in any 4at°r body? • _ ~ (e) Oischarge into surface water, or in iny alteratfon of surface water quality, including but not limite4 to tenperature. dtssalved ~ axyqen or turbidity? . . . • • • • • (f) Alteratfan of the dira_ttion or rate of flax of ground waters? - (g) Change in the quantity of Sound waters, aioner through direct adGitions or Nithdrawais, or througn in*.erteption of an ~ aquifer by cuts or excavations2 • • • • - (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either thraugh direct injectton, or through the seepage of leacnate, pnosaates. detergants, waterborne virus or bacteria. or other luestances X into tne gound waters? • • • ' • • • - - (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise availablp far v Gublic water suppiies?_,n + • ~,.,I_, ~ --Exo 1 anation . ~y . 4. fiora. Will Lhe proposai resuit in: Yes 4aYbe No (a) Change in the dfversity of ;oec;es, or number of any soecies or flora (includtng treQs, shrubs, grass, crops, mscror'lora and ~ aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Reduttton of the numbers of any ur.ique, rare or endanqered specfes of flara? . . . . . . . _ (c) intraduction of ne►r species of flora ir,co ar, area, or x in a barrier Lo the normal repienisnrtwnt 3f existtng 5pecies? _ (d) Reductton in acreage of any agricultural crop7 . . . . . . . Ix Expianatjon• 5. rauna. Will the proposal result in: ies Mayhe No (a) Changes in Che diversity aT species, or numoer of any soecies of fauna (birds. iand animals including -eptiles, fish and y ;hellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? . . • • • • • • . _ L (b) Reductton of the numbers of any um que. rare, or eneangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~ (c) Introduction of ne++ species o` faura into ar area. or result y in a oarrier to Lhe migration or movement of fauna? . . . . • • _ ~ (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wiidlife iabitat? . • _ Exoianation: Voise. Yes NaYOe No (a) 'dill the prooosal iRCrease existing noi5e leveis? . . • • _ x Exalanation: 7 Liqht and Glare Yes Mavbe No (a) 'dill the pro osai roduce new liah or glare7` ,IIq-;~ • • • G - Exoianatian: ~ ~2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - i 11 ,:E FOR cXFl,iaNAT;0,-i TS iilAGEQJATc, °L=r+Sc A~ACi 7t~i1Al DA6£S. ) ;r; So;'d v+asta nd dtsc~sai? . . • ~ • • • • - ~ ttiAi3naCion• _ Yes Maybe No 17, Huran ~lealth. blill the proposal resuit in the c'eat.ion of any heaith hazarGs ~ or oatpntial heatth hazard (excludfng crtenral he3ith)? . . . . . . . . . . . "cxo'.anaticn• 18. ,aesthetics. :4iil the pr-.pasai result in the )ostructzon 3g any scenzc vista or vieu upen ta the oublic, cr wiil the proposal resuit in *_re creation c` an ~ aestnetfcsily offensive sjte open zo puolic view3 . . . . . . . . . . . Exvianatian: ,9. RQCreation. Will the prooasai resul: •n in liMact upon the quaiity or ~ quantity of exlstinq recreationai opportunities? . . . . . . . . Eralanation: 20. Arc.~eoloqicallHistortcal. 'd111 the oroposal result in an 3?teratton af a Yes Mavbe Io significant arche4loqical or nistarical site. strLCture, aoject or builaing? L,olantt:an , SIG,YkTURE t, the undersiyn?d, swear unaer the _eralty or Feriury *.hat the dbove responses are made trutntuil/ ind to the oest ef my Rnowlzage. i al;o uAderstar.e ttia;.. ;noula there oe any W>>1fLl m,sreoresencatter or witlfui lac'. of *4i1 d•stlosure on my ~ari:,Spokane County may withdraw any aeclaration of rsonsiam fitance that it mzght issue in ~eIiance upon thzs cLe-kiist. ~ Oate: 7- arnponent: . (Piease Print or Tyoe) r ?roponent: ~ Ac7dres5. ~ ~ ?hone• (il.`f __UT'L0 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ C.~i~`a ~ ~ ?erson comp?eting `orm• Phane: Aate: OeBart--ent ar Uffice or County Revie++ina I"hezklts*_: SCarf t4emner;s) Reviewing Checkii;t: • ~ ([F SPAC£ =0R EXPI.?VATION (S INAOEQUATE. PLEAS"c ATTACH AOOITiONAL P4GES.) 8. Land Us2. Yes Navbe No (a) '~ill the proposal result in the alteration of the oresent or ~ ✓ pianned land use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Exolanation: 9. Vatural 4esources. 'aill :he propasal result in: Yes lavbe yo (a) Increase in the rat2 of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x (b) Oepietion of any nonrenewabie natural resaurce? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ iL cxolanatton: , 10. Risk of Uoset. Ooes the proposal involve a resk of an exulosion or the Yes Mavbe 1,40 release of haZardous substances (inciudfnq, but not iimited t0. oil, pestfcides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or ~ upset condittons? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanation: , il. Population. Yes Maybe No 'aill the craposal alter the locatfan, distribution, density, or grawth J , rate of the human populatian of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . :xplanatfon: ' 12, Housina. 41i11 the prooasai affect existing housing. or create a demanC for additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ ~ cxDlanatton: 13. TransoorLation/C{rculation. 41i11 the proposal result in: Yes ?laybe No (a) Generatlon of addttianal vehicular movement? . . . . . . . . . x _ (b) Effects on existing parking facilTties, or demand for new parking7 (c) Imoact upon existing transoortatfon systemsl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Alterations Lo present patterns of circulatton or movement x of people and/or gaods? . . . . . . . . . ~ _ (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . . . _ (f) Increase in traffic hazards co motor venicles, bicyclists or p des rTans? . . . . . . . . X Exo i anati on • ~b~G k'~ { . . ~ 14. ?uoiic Services. Will the proposai nave an effect upon, or result Yes Mavbe Na in a need ror new or altereC governmental services in any of of the fOllowing areas: x (a) Fire ?rotectzon7 . . . . . . . . . . • • / _ (b) Police protectian? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ - (a) Parks or other recreatjonal facflities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (e) ~Naintennnce ar' public facitities, includinq roads? . . . . . . . . . ~ _ (f) Other governmental - rvi es? . . . . . • _ cxp 1 anation • ~ ~ ~UeJ2.1i (IF SPACE FOR LXPLANATION [5 INAOEQUATE, PLEASc ATTACH AODITIQVAL ?4GES.) 15. cneray 'aill the prooosal result in: Yes !layoe ilo (a) Use of suostantial amounts of fuel or enerey? . . . . . . . . • _ ,~C' , (b) Oemand upon existsng sources of energy, or reauire tfie development of new sources of energy? . . . . . . . . _ ~ cxalanatton: . 16. Utilities. 'dill Lhe orooosal resuit in a need for new systems. 'tes Maybe Vo or alterations `.a the foilowing utiisties: (a) Power or natural gas? . • • • • • • • • • ~ - (G) Canmumcaczon systems? . . • • • • • • • • • • ~ - (c) Water7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . % - (d) Se+ver or septlic tanks? . . . • • • • • • • ~ - (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . • • • • ~ 3 ~ . ~ ♦ ~ z.:- ~ 1'*TTJr'RJTUr ~t ~u " ~i~ aif .o u41 i81 ~.i i14 01 .16 n so „ .~u .u ~M • ir I>t va~ n w ~qr 14@ iN Ir+ d 79 ~~::4~~ ~ ~ ~ • ( : ~ ~ ~ , . ~ ~r a + ( . , ~ e,~►.~.. ^ :c. ~~sr - ♦ I • ~ I ; ~ I Ol t I Y e; a[ I ~ s . , y1 ~ ( ~ ° _ p. _ _ • r _ L . - - ~ _ _ ~ _ ~ ' ^ - _ _ ~ + • ' I r'a iw eo ni ~s m w•r r~+. io i 4 • • ( I , ` ~ • I J . i I I o r . I ( • ~ , _ ~ a « ro., ~ r . . ~ o ~ I o' Y I M.. r, Q 2 r J~ MI~A Nh ~ .I ( a ~ • • } [ ~ ~ t ~tnh.ooA~ SC11001 ; •~rr~•'~• ~ NLLI[tL[Y ~VL l ~ ~ » ~10~~ ~ ♦ .~1,~~~ t d,lt Il7J _ I„ OD O, di 107 ~IW O d( J 4 W1.0 u~ ~Ii1 1.5 • ~ In 117 110 ul .40 li' 1 / 11{ q1 l1 t IU M~ W • S•~ W ~ n~r~. • I ; r.~~~r r » b I no Iopnle ~I p` r S, OV 9 ; a• i ~ , , 1 w I N.G.. •v t ~ . k . . . « ,.s,. . w , ~ u 1040 ~ `~o u - :vf I s i-' n ? E~ ~`\\~~~*t; T _ - - - - -I....__-,--- • _tr' a _ LMIJ ~ "fCe -.~e.•r ' " ~ ~it \ a K~M~ ~ ~ \ ~ F . _ • - ~ I p ~ . ~ ~z AL Url/MJ~ : s. ROLL/NG L ~ lNDU: [JGI~D__ \p ~ ~ .iG l AV/ ~ ~ - ~ - \ ~ 1Wt w~.r• ( t ~ I A1.rv~I' I \ tl~ ~ 'w~ . • I ~M * \ s.... 11 ~ ` - - 9 ~ - - -~!;1~- - - - ~ n - t~ oNJ a WwY4tD ~ ~ . p ~ - I ~►1 ` t ~ I ~ e CIN ~ct o, - lA7. ~~o•+ ~ ~it _ r \ [ o ~ • ' i ~ J ; ~ ~ . , j ~ • 'p ' ~ ~I110[l r4f0• _ _ o : + ♦ ~ A t1 n b w Aj 7CDt4 v hl M ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ [ ~ • V 1 L V W ~ . . r ) ` I W ' • - _ ~ _ a~ ~ . J l .r] --~s 1 r •~va~s~o~ . ~ I ; • ~ !.j`a= ~I A(t 1!~ S • GOu0+Tv IIQaO No =]I2*.. "It M• tlie ~ ' ' J1~JJ ~"f _ i LE ~ • ^ .~'t.~~~~~i_ ~t~♦ •!f- I~.=-MIO.. : ~ _ " _ = ' " ; ~ 'L ~ ' ' / Ar.. . -_sQ' '..~I/N • ~ 4TM • A" ~ ' x-14 ! 1 r~ 1~• .l t~ p~vL ~ . 1•.~.. ~ t.. rr. . . ` ~ • LL,'~ii ~ ' • .l e[lJr1~ S Nln ♦vl ~t ~~~b~~'~+--•~r Rt__j . ~ _ r 1 i) 1N ~ I1~v11~1~ ~ 17~• I~I •yy • •I ; N(~h0[tiQ ~ . ` . ~ ~ ; ~ ~.r i •v~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r • , { ~ y Li _ ( - ~ ~ ~ ~~.1• ~ i _ t . l~v' (..~l.rr I ~ ~ ti 1.~.~. ~ i~• . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ V Q • C ~w`~i n. . • ~ ~ ~ - ~ , ! ° • ' ~ ~ e • ~ i ~ ~ 'r ~ ' ~ ` ~ ° ~ e ~ • ~ i • o `i .n 7~- - r ~ i • ~ ~ . ~ ~ ` I ` . + _ , . • ' I 1.Iw1rI0u~1 Avik. ' • r!~ - ~ 210 -78 VERIFICATION OF AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SSa COUNTY OF SPOKAN E ) . J Bcing first duly sworn, deposea and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizcn of The United States, a resident of Spokane Cour,ty, Washington, and ovQr the age of twenty-one yearsv pAmSerVt'j That on 192-2; hc personally true and correct copies of the NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: 1. ~,ll~ ~ S► ,a7~ ~ d~ Li►. t'1 E' a v G~ 2. 3. Subscri'aed and sworn to mo 19 ~ . , f NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHING-20,1 Residing at Spokane, Washington AFFIDAVIT OF MaILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) ss. CO UNTY OF SPOKAIVE ) being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of The United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the o~~d day of 1'~7E8RUlqle 1979 I personally deposited in the United States mail at ~ with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorpora ted herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records a s of the "4 day of FE,69e /Ale V . 79 , 19, who have be en found to own property within a four hundred (400) foot periphery of the applicant's controlled property. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. DATED this day of 19 7q . a - v i SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this , day of , 19 . 6- ,~y I~otary Publi~ in and for the S ta t ~OTARY ] PU61.IC of Washington, residing at Spokane. f O ~Y 15, ~ ATION NO. CVO ~ At said time and place, aiiy interested person may appear, ~or or against, the granting of this application. AGENDA, FEBRUARY 15, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMTTTEE Time: Thursday, February 15, 1979, 1:30 P, M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 jefferson Street, Spokane ZONE RECLASSIOCATION 7, ZE-?,j0-Z$, RealdeaLial Of.#icP Lo Lor,al Business a. Location: Section 15 , Township 25 N,, Range 44 , E, W. M. The West 150 feer of the S 1/2 of the S 1/2 and the West 150 feet of the S 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the S 1/2 of Block 84, Opportunity. b. Vicinity Location: East of Pines Road, approximately 400 feet south of Broadway Avenue, c . Applicant: Ken Redlin East 7622 Valley Way Spokane, WA 99206 d. Site Size: Approximately 37,500 square feet e. Exis ting Zoning : Re sidential Office, e s t. March 4, 1976 f. Proposed Zoning: Local Business g, Proposed Use of Property: Retail Business and Professional Office(s) h. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4. 21 . 040 i, Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental fmpact. -8 - WNTGOMEAY . m - O 1~7: 9G r ~ -IN r.t O ~ ~ G' Q ~ I Q r ~ 5 S~ON AVE~ _ ~ i o o N 0 G ' 0 / . AXw y ~ "f UL 0 0 t Q 1 $ ~ „N~ i T Z 47;v-E E l L 0 ft S►+AR Y gppNE t Q ~ 0 E 5 M e"T ' Q p~ o r ~ ~ _ oo a a~. ~ ~ U pf~«E r ' ~ ~ o U, 711 ~ 2 • ~ v ~ 0 o k ~ • W m ( MA a rr 3 " a., . ~ °n ~ > ,jL►~ 00 a 0 t4 I p m - 44h ~ AY 7 ~ r ~ . ► ~ b . , . ' • , ` %j'rit; ~ c► v t1 w •'cod ~ ~ ~inES;i1t~MOf. ; K ~ AV K I ~ • ~o vaL L~ ~ 7&,,yf Avey ~ Z~ G V A L L E r W A Y . `•1 a ~ ALL Y WAY 0 • ~ , ~ .1 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ N Q M~,,~ nl * ~ OI w 1~ ~ ~~rY < ~ _ tN aAVE ~loE r RIVERSIDE z • v t A ~rt IIHO~ ~ 0 u Y ~ ~E vE. ti.oc r a~ 3 x r ~9~ PR ~ ~ L1..1993 ~ ~ i8 PCS1 FFICE . ~ Q r ~ No 2`312# D , ~ v AV UKEE RA! LROAD ' Q : ~ ~ _ ~ ` • " Ro 4tH E. 111:100of Q TH -i• . ° For L't , puR T H A~ , - '