The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-41-76 . 4Act~ .S v,6,~ Lo c•~ L. .~v s jlv E-~ ~ ZE ~/l ~ , TA - PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTIOrj DgTE ACTiQN TAKEN RF QR12 QF ACTION O L ,C0 I I U S No.~ 6,,c C, T~ De-bj~,- Aoei F ~ • ~ E ~ ~IG=- -sR bc-C P" 114E . , ~ JAti { P~ L ARlNG- I I - - ~ r------~ - ~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~ - - - _ - - ► ~ . ; I 's - ~ . - _ - _ - - - - - t - ~ - - - - _ - - - _ - - I . I r ~ f I i ~ r~ ~.i~..~ ~~.■■~~~~...~.w.~. . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - i / AOL I I I 1 ~15x 'sat~r 44 _f!+4I~ : v~ ~ ` a ~ ~f►~ R }~:'a l I f ~ - ~ ~ ' ~ ~ . .ti , u~ : .,~..r, ~ ~ n '~A • ~ * 4 f Tti~~i ~ ~ a.. • «L i6~:~'~y~ ~n ~h . ~ • L ~ w .f 1 _ f, e - ,RRV^~ ~P~ . . i ` . , r ~ { 1, '7~+•. , - ' +~J Z i :'~'r- ~ ^ ist►'~ i . . y ~yx~ t ;,r - - c a~~ . ~ .«'!~r ~ • f I' ~ w 007 _ L4 WITH BROADVdAY BEING THE UPPER ROAD, AND NOKT:: PINSS ROAD BEING ALONG THE BOTTOM OF THE PIC "'t':~:: . Picture # 1 ` - - . ' m { . ~ ■ ~ ` 1! ♦ ~ ~ y . y- ~ s ~ , ..-,''",.r E ~ ...y , , . , . ~ _ • m t. _ s , _ . ~s..~`:~: : -^~w • ' ~ ae" • , ~ - a qt i NORTH PINES CENTER - 1014 NORTH PINES ROAD Picture # 4 . , r . ~ . . - ~ - - - is w ~ ~1 y ~ * . ~F*,~~ r~ ~ - 1,~~ • - a ' i' . . . • ~ 4. ~ ~ ~ 71 ' '.v ✓ ~ ~..1 . i . ~ . _ . . _.a _ _ .i . i " " _ ' . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . PINES ROAD. Since construction is not yet complete .r it is impossible to account for the number of parkinp spaces which will be available. Picture 4 2 ' i ; . , r s t ~ ' • 1. ' 'w . ~ L . t ~ ~ ~e r J, k+~ t / ti ~ ~J ♦ ~ ~-*~F ¢ ~!K ~f t' .y C ~ ~ + f ~ t,,• ' f.. ~ y~-'~~~ . :~s " ? +n~. . r_uY; ~+we'e.~.. _ . . . t~~.~ `t .~l~~. r,,~ ~E~`: _ _ *`F ~ ' „ - r~ ~ ~ . ~ _ r: ~ "r~,~ M ► ' ~~e►t. ~ ° ~ . I~► ~ • ~ NORTH PINES PROFESSIONAL BUILDING - 1005 N. PINES RD. PIC TURE # 3 r - ~ ~ ~L . r '1 ^ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANIVING DEPARTMENT f p PUBUC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFFE880N STREET PHONE 458-2274 ~ ~ . ~ SPOKANE WASHINOTON 99201 ' . SPDKANE COUNTY GOUf7T MOUSC MEMORANDUM . • =00j0*1 ~-o , -c Q.GL^'6 ~'t, ~Jl~~ rLC,~ ~C010 ~1G811 S Iv%C~ ,4-kA 6' . ( JIr c~ll,Ul4~o-R.IM,sv~-cJj `tCf~.~. F RO M: S pokane County Planning Department N. 811 Jefferson, Spokane, WA 99201 Attention:71zN 1 . SwE3, -rzscIt.- DATE: R E F E R E N C E: Attached Pivpo sed Declaration of Non -Sign ificance and Environmental Checklist for Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be one of )urisdiction, WAC 197-10-040 (4). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your right to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), please be advfsed that theproposal was listed fn the SEPA Public Information Center on LQ - Z 7- 7 (,w C V1xpxJ~~.i SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING N 811 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2274 aSPOKANE WASHINGTON 99201 JpOKANE fC'UNT►' COl 177 HOUSE LEAD AGENCY DESIGNATION O F SPOKANE C4UNTY Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203 (3), the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following descri.bed project: k -fur ~ oc~~a t a Z E-~-1 7 d~c 40 ~ C,o r mr The following i.s explanation for this deterrninatfon: , WA-C~~°7 ° (E) 22 a Determination for Spokane County By: Name: CwPt-r2..F-riL Title: Zam-OWc. Aornar,. Zp r'~ Date: 10- 2 5- 7a November 10, 1976 To: Spokane County Planning Commission To Whom It May Concern: I, as a propertg c~nner in the IIroa&sy and Fines area of Spokane County, am amazed at the sehcol district's attitude ecncerrung the rezoni.ng of the property on Braadrvay and P_-nas. Does not, thP school district krnow that more tax,es are gainad from cormnerclally zonPd propCrty than from residential? Does the school district gain more tax_es from its pcor residents, alread3t overtared for misman3gement in school sysiems, etc., than from businese construction and aperation? On tha other hand, who in their , right mi-nd r~ould bw.la a house at eurrent nrices--and ha.ve a Uack yard next to aochcol? Noone: (in thei r ri ght mind ) Business has moved in around and about ni3r propertf--it is no longer a residential arAa, what wit.h apartment rouses, garden rto:as, and dcctor's offices (back ta back) behl.nci ana surrounairg my prorf.rtya The entire arpa ia comm-rcial. tMat is trd barb, ahuLt an old truck farm area now vaca.nt and usple::s begin 7cned coIIimercial anci being USED: The property was vacant and desert3c', when SaFECO aecided ta enlargeo 7:culd not t-is type of structure be better than VO'I'h'IP1G: School taxes cume from many saurces--and it curprises me that the greed fram which it comes does not r:;alize tr.ib yett Heing a tax payer for many years and not havint zny chidren to benefit--there has to be a compro~r~ise somewhere' . f ~ ~ \ ~ ~ , _ _ ~ November 10, 1976 To: Spokane Count~ PZanning Commission Re: Zone Change on the corner of Pines and Broadwa~ Dear Sirs: As an owner of propert~ across the street from the proposed zone change to eommerciaZ on the eorner of Pinea and Broadwa~, I wouZd Zike to voiee m~ approvaZ of sueh rezoning. I feeZ that zt ~ouZd enhance m~ propert~ at that Zocation, and be compatibZe with the neighborhood. Thank you. ~ ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' , . ; ~ ~ C~~ ~ , , ~ . November 10, 1976 To: Spokane County PZanning Commission Re: Zone Cliange on the eorner of Pines and Broadway Dear Sirs: IwouZd Zike to show my support for the estabZishment of the restaurant at the corner of Pines and Broadway. There are several reasons why I feeZ this deveZopment wouZd be desirabZe. The restaurant wouZd eertainZy eZean up that eorner and Zook good. Anythzng wouZd Zook better than that vaeant Zot whieh does nothing but eoZZeet posters and debris. The restaurant wouZd be eompatibZe with the neighborhood as Zong as no beer was soZd, and its signs were not too fZashy. As to the schooZ board's opposition to the deveZopment beeause of kids smoking in the Zot, it has been the experienee on my property aeross,the street from the schooZ that the kzds smoke everywhere. I even had to take down a shed on my property because they were 8moking there. AZso, I have never noticed any facuZty member of the sehooZ taking eare of any of these kind of probZems. Again, for these reasons, I voice my support of this zone ehange, and urge the pZanning eommission to approve it. Thank you. ~ ~ , , ~ , , ~D~~► ~f . THRESHOLD DETERMINATION DECLARATION OF , (proposed/final) .e $PONAN[ CCUNTY CpURi N01t5E MON J'`✓N I F I C^" Q"CF, (significance/nonsignificance) 1. Description of Proposal. ~nO/VL eUAf,;C, L= r-~26/u A~-G2l tJb 6UR#4,?Ar-'J To LaCAi-- &uvov~E&,s rOR 3 -7>y rnv so Fr. Ta ~3cE v st5-n AS A f /2`2A ~ 2. Proponent: f7E7E-- ~ ALALC-10 3. Contact Person• 2 3, County Actfon (s) Reques ted •:ZO /VIF CAIA-706- a t4 5' •4-60 VE- 4. Location of Proposal• 5 VU (~~A)t:e- ~5~ bR4L~0IN~ b< 0 0 ~ i Nkff-s f N) 5R--x N9 ~A-V-: Y . 5. Lead Agency. ~'~~~N~ ~ • This proposal has been determined to Wi-T have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is -jKOT required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. 6. Responsible Official• ~ Position/'Title. CN~~~~~~ , 445,6,OF SPO' C-0• COA4A41SS i0NL-"ZcS' Department fOLAi✓N//1/4S AFn~: . Date. (final) Signature• C . final) e er. ng~ f#.- imepased'~--' 41 SEPA PIC Refer. Pi 2E '`41-7~,(final) Department Referenc e "'~~-7~ ~~inal) (See Reverse Side) 12 1ViINUTES ~ OVEMBER 12, 1976 1~I ~~~~:•c✓R'~ • ~ L kf ZONE CHANG'z 2. ZE-41-76 - AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO L4CAL BUSINESS: TALARICO, Planning Commission Action: A motion tD apprave the request failed for lack af a second; a moti~n to deny the request failed for lack of a quorem (4 votES reqvired). (On motion for denial, three voted aye and one voted no) A. REASONS BxPRES SED FOR DENIAL: 1. The Spakane County Comprehensfve Plan 3nd the Generalized Metropoli- tan Plan both inclicate the site as being appropnate for residential uses; i. e., possibly Multiple Family Suburban or Residential Office uses. The Spokane Ccaunty Comprehensive Plan indicates that a neighborhood shopping Cistrict wnuld be appmpriate on the east side of Pines between Broaclway and Mission. IVOTE: Several propertfes within the described area have been reclassi- fied to the Local Business Z°-)ne in accordance with the Compre- hensive Plan. 2. The Planning Commission has been enc-)uraging and approving requests f:)r Resieential Office and Multiple Family Suburban Zone reclassifica- tions for West Pines frontage properties. 3. The Board of Directors for the Central V311ey School District No. 356 have recuested that the Spokane Cnunty Planninq Commissfon refra-in fmm rP~^ning properties adi3cent t-) Central Valley School Distrfcts educa- t2. nal establishments to the CommErcial, I,ccal Business, Restricted Industrial or Manufacturing Zone classifications. B. REASONS EXPRESSED FOR APPRGVAL: 1. The Central Valley School Dfstrict's objections to the pr^posed zone - change and praposed use were not that appropnate. 2. The proposed Pizza Parl7,r wr-,uld be an appropriate use of tne subject property. C. GENERAL DATA: 1. Location: Section 16, Township 25 N., Range 44, E. W. NT The E 300 ft of N 110 ft of Tract 85 . of Opportunfty. - 4 - 1 6`4 F .ZE-41-76 - AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS (Centinued) 2. Amilicant: Pete Talarico W. 2332 Sinto Avenue Spokane, V11A 99201 3. Site Size: ~3, 000 square feet 4. lExisting Zoning: Agricultural Suburban, established April 12, 1955 5. Prop~)sed Zoning: Local Business 6. Proposed use of property: Pizza Restaurant 7. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4. 21, Section 4.21.040 -5- s DATA CONCERNING 'ZONE CHANGE ZE 41-76 The following information is entered in support of the above application for zone change on the corner o'f Pines Road and Broadway. The listing indicates that there are many in- stances of business zoning abutting or near,schools in the Spokane area. It is submitted ,th'at the proximity of North Pines Junior High School to the proposed restaurant should not defeat this application for zone change. All businesses listed either are adjacent to or within a short block of the respective schools. SCHOOL: BUSINESSES: Central Valley District , Chester Elementary Circle "K" convenience store Greenacres, Elementary Green Valley Inn Cafe Greenacres Junior High Auto supply store; miscellaneous ~ retail outlets across the street University Elementary Gas station; 7-11 store East Vally District Trent Elementary Tavernr; gas station,; miscellaneous retail outlets across the street West Valley District Argonne Junior High Tavern Spokane School District Audobon Elementary Drive-in restauran,t; gas station; miscellaneous retail outlets Bancroft Elementary Miscellaneous retail outlets Bryant Elementary Drug store; miscellaneous retail outlets `Cooper Elementary Restaurant; grocery store;,miscel- laneous retail outlets Emerson Elementary Restaurant; miscellaneous retail outlets Finch Elementary Grocery store i I . SCHOOL: BUSINESSES: Spokane School District Garfield Elementary Drive-in restaurant; gas station Garland Elementary Grocery store Holmes Elementary Grocery store; hardware store Jefferson Elementary Two grocery stores; drug store Logan Elementary Restaurant; donut shop; drug store; I miscellaneous retail outlets Longfellow Elementary Restaurant; 7-11 store; grocery store; drug store; two gas stations; miscellaneous retail outlets Pratt Elementary Grocery store Ridgeview Elementary Grocery store; two drug stores; gas station; miscellaneous retail out- ~ lets Roosevelt Elementary Grocery store Sheridan Elementary Two grocery stores We;stview Elementary Warehouse market Willard Elementary Restaurant; gas station; grocery store Wilson Elementary Miscellaneous retail outlets Glover Junior High Shadle,Shopping Center Havermall Junior High Miscellaneous retail outlets Libby Junior High Drive-in restaurant; gas station; miscellaneous retail outlets Sacajawea Junior High Manito Shopping Centdr; Yellow Front Lewis & Clark High Drive-in restaurant; restaurant; gas station; miscellaneous retail outlets 2 P SCHOOL: BUSINESSES: Spokane School District North Central High Two restaurants; 7-11 store; gas stations; donut shop; miscellane- ous retail outlets 'Shadle High Shadle Shopping Center; Gro,cery store NOTE: Drive-in restaurants as listed refer to take out establishments such asMcDonalds, A& W Root Beer, etc. Restaurants refer to establishments with primarily inside service and seating onl'y. Miscellaneous retail outlets in- clude small shops such as florists, barber shops, applicance stores, and other such small businesses. 3 i AodA 4A6~ ~ gelaiwl ~o~,UTION CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT 356 N 701 PINES ROAD ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99208 Q RICHARD L. OOELL. Prlncipal ~ m HARVEY R HAGEN, Asslstant Principal 2 Phone 9240750 b ~ 1>>6 _~9"~6 November 2, 1976 Mr. John T. Sweitzer Zoning Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission Public Works Building N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Mr. Sweitzer: Mr. Charles G. Stocker, Assistant Superintendent for Administration has asked me to correspond with your office regarding the proposed zoning change for the property on the corner of Pines and Broadway. The property is currently Agriculture- Suburban zone classification and the owners have requested a change to Local Business zone thus permitting a proposed pizza parlor. The administration and staff of North Pines Jr. High strongly support the Policy and position of the Central Valley School Board on zoning areas adjacent to schools. I believe Mr. Stocker forwarded that policy to you. Our assistant principal, Mr. Harv Hagen, was in attendance at the school board meeting on 0 ctober 12, 1976 and recommended that the C. V. School District Board of Directors reaffirm this policy. After considerable thought we thought it necessary to make this recommendation on behalf of our students. Our school has a closed campus policy and with a commercial eating establishment next door the temptations would be far too great for junior high aged students. The supervision of our students as well as the supervision of the neighboring property would be monumental. We regret taking this action against the owners who are requesting this change but definitely feel that it is in the best interests of our students and the Central Valley School District. If we can be of further help, please feel free to contact us. Sincerely, (-2- Richard Odell, Principal RECIENED North Pines Jr. High Ro:as Nov 3 19M 3rvr"vc VuUIv + t OL"NG M , DR GEORGE M EISENTROUT Y+►Q DIRECTORS °~~W E~ONOI~ ES~~ ~~t KATHY M PARSONS ~~t ovro►~tr CHARLES G STOCKER DR BRUCE L GEHMAN vioePreddenc CknortuWty A~atiie smvloee Centra': , V ~ •.ey Schoo District No. 356 JANET B FISCUS ubertr [Alce NEIL D PRESCOTT, JR OF ~~LLIEY RICHARD H,IVESTER oppoft-ey Aeeistent &qwrtnteadmt 123 S. Dowdish Otoed TeOephoee 924.4M1 ~"'n~ ~088 SPOCil~WE, M/ASI~IN640N 99206 DARRELL A THOMPSON ov~~r EDWIN J AAIKESELL mmam af awnm October 28, 1976 sell Mr. John T. Sweitzer Zoning Administrator Spokane County Planning Coimnisaion Public Works Building N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Mr. Sweitzer, The Central Valley School District has a district policy regarding zone changes. It is enclosed for your information and use. The Board of Directors of the Central Valley School District took action regarding this proposal at its meeting on October 12, 1976. The minutes are enclosed. The Central Valley School District has no intention of trying to stop development or progress in the Spokane Valley. We do have the right to be concerned when any development could cause problems for the owners or the school district. I have asked Mr. Odell, Principal of North Pines Junior High, to forward his concerns to you regarding this ma.tter. If I can be of further help to you in this matter, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, J~j~ ~ Charles G. Stocker Assistant Superintendent for Administration CGS:1 Enc. $41ECCOUCID 00T a 9 vm 3? e49U111C ~6,d4,,,t, f 11111111110~ ~1~~• i DR GEORGE M EISENTROUT ECOD~~~MY *'R"10 ~S~~~~/,~ DIRECTORS Sopedn~t KATHY M PARSON5 Premdent opportuuirr CHARLES G STOCKER DR BRUCE L GEHMAN vice rreddent Amhftnt ~~~~t Contra Va 1'ey ScIcol Distfil~6 Noe 356 JANETB FISCUS V~ ~ NEIL D PRESCOTT, JR ~ALLEY RICHARD H IVESTER opparim,ty Aeaietant 8upntntendent 128 S. Bowdieh Road Telephone 9244Ma DARRELL A THOMPSON av~~r ~~0~ ~0°° SPOB(APOE, WASOOIP06TON SS►206 EDWIN J MIKESELL November 12 1976 mmem ot awn= , 8avtoea NSr. John T. Sweitzer Zoning Administrator Spokane County Planning Commiasion Public Worka Building N. 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Dear Mr. Sweitzer, Please substitute the attached Policy #1415, "Zoning of Areas Adjacent to Schools", for the Policy 1425, "Public Gifts To Schools", which was sent to you in error on 4ctober 28, with a letter from Mr. Charles Stocker regarding a proposed zone change adjacent to North Pines Junior High School. We are sorry for any inconvenience to you. Si41, ntrout ee Superintendent , GME:1 Enc. AM%. ASM C~~°~ NQV i ~ . ow - I CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT #356 ZONING OF AREAS ADJACENT TO SCH40LS The Board of Directors of Central Valley School District #356 requeets the Spokane County Planning Commieaion to refrain from es- tabliahing local business, commercial, industrial, or limited induatrial zones adjacent to eetabliehed echools, exieting echool sites, and pro- jected achool eites. In the event that it becomes necessary for the district to purchase school sites fn the future, the Board will make every effort to work cooperatively with the Spokane County Planning Commission to avoid selecting sites next to areas already zoned local businesa, commercial, industrial or limited industrial. Adopted by Board of Directors 7/23/74 i ` Min4tee of Meeting Board of Directore Central Valley School Diatriot /356 Octcrber 12, 1976 ~ -2- 4. Reporte (contiaued) C. Mr. Nei:~ Prescott infqrmed the Board of the district's progress in complying with Title IR. He st4ted that baeically all the elementary schoole are in compliance, but that,4t the secondary leve1, physical education classee and athletice and couree qfferings were of some concern. He etated that princi- pals anfl etaff were cqoperative and that he was confident that by the eummer of 1978 the Central V41ley School Dietrict will be in complete compliance in all areoe regarding Tttle IX and W$ehington Administrative Code regarding equal opportunities fQr boye and glLrls. D. Mr. Clyde Sale, Bowdieh Junior High, acting as junior high coordinator of activitles, made a compreheneive report qn the junior high achool activities program of the dietrict. REJECTION pF APPEAL FOR REZONING OF PROPERTY /"Mr. Thiemann, representing House of Propertiee, Inc., requested Board approval . ~ to petition the Planning Commiesion to rezone property north of the North Pinee Junior High School from agriculture-euburbau to local buainess, to permit con- struction af a family pizza parlor. The appeal wae rejected on the baeie of TJietrict Palicy No. 1415, Zoning of Areae Adjacent to Schoole, and by the follo ing motion: ~ Airector Gehman moved that the Central Valley Dietrict go on record as aseuming ; ~ a position that the development of a commercial restaurant on the property as de8cribed is not in the beet interest of the educational establiehment at No=th Pines Junior High School. Director Iveeter seconded the motion. The vote: , pirector Thompson, Yes; Director Fiacue, Yee; Director Ivester, Yes; Director Gehman, Yee; Director Pareone, Yee. 6.' ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRIBUTION FOR MEDIA CENTER AT OPPORTUNITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL pirector Ivester moved approval of the requeet of the Principal of Qpportunit Elementary School to accept a dieplay table suitable for displaying booka in Xhe media center from Mre. Jan Piger. Director Fiecua •econded the motion. xhe vote: Director Thompeon, Yes; Director Fiscue, Yee; Director Iveeter, Yes; Director Gehman, YeB; Director Parsons, Yes. 7. REPORT ON RELOCATABLE CLASSROOMS The Board received awritten report, as requeeted at its laet meeting, on the eompaniee who were contacted to eupply a relocatable claesroom facility at Greeaacres Elementary School. The report as submitted, is as follovs: "The following companiea were contacted in regard to the leaoe aad/or purchase ' pf a relocatable claseroom: Designed Facilitiee Leaeing Company - Seattle MICO Manufacturing - Boiee. Idaho Space Rentale - Commerce City, Colorado Elder Equipment - Portlanc Boise Cascade - Poet F411s Port-A-Built Systems, Inc. - rasco ]:n addition to the above samed companies, eeveral echool dietricts were contacted *nd checked for poseible surplue relocatableo. None of tha diatricta contacted bad aaq aurplue buildingo. , r ' 0100 BEFC)FdE THE B0ARD Og COU1U?.'Y COIvq1VYJISSIONfERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHTIVGTUN ZE-41-7V ~ t ~ xN, THE IVtPiTTER OF CHANGING THE ZOMNG MAP } FROM 1a,GRICULTtJRAL SUBURLAN TO LOCAL ) 8USINESS 014 PROPERTX LUCATEID'IN S£CTION ) R E S O L U T I O N 16, TOWNSHIP 25 N., RANGE 44, E.W.M., ~ SP4KANE COUNTY, WASHII\TGTOIV ) The abave-entitled matter coming on regularly for hearing before the Board of County Commis sioners of Spokane County, Washington, on this day, and it appearing to the Board that the Spokane County Plann4ng Commission has gitren due notice of the hearing on the matter in the manner and for the time prodided by law; that safd Plannfng , Comanission has laeld a public hearixlg as required; and that the said Planning Commis- sion concura in the plan to zone the foltowing desCribed property as: , LOCAL BUS$NESS; ' - , The E,300 feet of the IV 110 feet of Tract 85 of Oppottunity, Section 160 Township 25 No, Range 44, E.W. Nt Spokane County, Washington e NOWe THEREFORE, BE IT RESO]LVED, that the above-descrihed property be, and the same fs zoned under the classification of LOCAL BUSIIVESS as defined in the Zonfng Ordinance af Spokane County, adopted August 25, 1953, as amended. AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED that any dedelopment on the above-described property shall be sub9ect to the follovving conditionst i) Ymprovement of Plnes Road along the proieot perimetes to Spokane County road standards. Improvement shall include the replacement of exfsting walkway with cement concrete sidewallcs o Tmprovement of Broadway Avenue along the project perimeter to Spokane County road standards e Improvements shall include drainage control and paving from existing curb to existing pawement. 2) Access permits for the advertised propecty shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's office prior to release of _,building permfts. NOTEe Access to Pines Road shall be pra►hibited. 3) The advertised propecty shall be developed in substantial conformance wi#h - the development plan on file with this apglication. NOTE: The off-street parking facility and connect9.ng drfvevvays shall be developeal !n substantfal conformance wgth the development on file with this appiication eAny portion of the project whfch is to be occupied or traweled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. 4) An appropriate on-sfte storm drainage disposal system shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's office prfor to release of builcling permits for the proiect. 5) A specific landscape plan and installation schedule for the proiect, incor- parating a sprfnkler system, shall be approved by the Spokane County Zoning Administrator prior to release of buflding permits.The applieant shall pro- vide a screen, sight-obscurfng fence, six (6) feet in height along the south property line of the advertised pmperty. NQTE: Fence shall not exceed thirty-six (36) inches in height within the required front yacd. Cont' d 1 G AIP 6) Approval of sevvagre disposal facilities by the $pokane County Health Df stcict e PASSED BY THE BOARID TMS DAY OF 1977 e BOARD OF COUNTY CONi1VIISSIONERS OF SP0KA1dE COU11TTYY, WASHTNGTON I~~'--, , ~ VOPCT NARRY M., LAW& AT'rEST; VERN01V W o OHI.AND Clerk he 8oard , Byo ` De uty ~ This is to certify that this is a true and cormct co~~o€ Resolution No. passed b t,he Board this 3 day of 1977. y By.• ' f ~ , Deputy , s I hereby certffy that I have posted the above changes and reviaions on the Zoning IVlap in the Buflding Codes Departmento and do further certify that the zone classification change fs the same as descrYbed, above and showxi on the a hed map : SIGNEDo 1 ~DATED. -2- ~ . ~ • NO~' ~ 01G5 . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON FINDIiVGS AND ORDER REGARDING ZOIVING MAP PROPOSAL, ZE-41-76, AGRICULTURAZ SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS: TALARICO IN THE MATTER CONCERNING the Spokane County Planning Commission's action in consideration of the request of Pete Talarico for a zone change from the Agricultural Scnburban Zone classification to Local Business classification on the following described property: Section 16, Township 25 N. , Range 44, E.W. M. The E 300 feet of N 110 feet of Tract 85 of Opportunity, Spokane County, Washington. At the November, 1976 Planning Commission hearing, a motion to approve the request failed for lack of a second; a motion to deny the request failed for Iack of a quorem (4 votes required).(On motion for denial, three voted aye and one voted no.) The sponsor appealed fhe Planning Commission's action and requested a hear- ing before the Board of County Commissioners. This hearing was held on January 6, 1977, and a decision as rendered on january 201 1977. The Board of County Commissioners does hereby find that: The advertised pro- perty is located on the southwest corner of Pines Road and Broadway Avenue, a ma jor intersection , and is located on the edge of a residential neighborhood. The Board of County Commissioners are of the opinion that the proposed restaurant as inchcated on the development plan in conjunction with the listed conditions of approval will make the pro ject compatible with the existing and future land uses of the area. (Note: Additional requirement of six (6) foot sight-obscuring fence along the south property line. ) N4W THEREFORE, the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County does hereby conclude that the above-described property should be reclassified to the Local Business classzfication and does hereby order that an appropriate resolution for that purposz be prepared, subject further to the following conditions. 1) Improvement of Pines Road along the project pen.meter to Spokane County road standards. Improvement shall include the replacement of existing walkway with cement concrete sidewalks. Improvement of Broadway Avenue along the project ;perimetEr to Spokane County road standards. Improvements `shall include drainage control and paving from exi sting curb to exi sting pavement. 2) Access permits for the advertised property shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's office prior to release of building permits. NOTE: Access to Pines Road shall be prohibited. n 3) The advertised property shall be developed in substantial conformance with the development plan on file with this application. NOTE: The off-street parking facility and connecting driveways shall be developed in substantial conformance with the developmeni on file with this application. Any portion of the proj ect which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. 4) An appropriate on-site storm drainage disposal system shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's office prior to release of buildmg permits for the project • 1 vy S) A specific landscape plan and installation schedule for the project, incorporating a sprinkler system, shall be approved by the, Spokane County , Zoning Administrator pnor to release of building permits. The applicant shall provide a screen, sight-obscuring fence, six (6) feet in height along the south property line of the advertised property. NOTE: Fence shall not exceed th{irty-six (36) inches in heighfi within the required front yard. ) 6) Approval of sewage disposal facilities by the Spokane County Health District. DATED this ~ day of 1977. U BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON %onn • iEK-mi • v RY M. ED ATTEST: VERNON W. OHLAND Cler the Bo . B Y' Deputy . ~ -2 - ?ONE CHANGES POSTED ON Zt NG MAPS ~ Application No. -Z Re s. No. - 000 Re s. Date tl-7 From• • . To• • 1~_ , Posted B • ~~-1/ ~ Date Posted: y• - . Acre s: Se c. ic Two, Range EAST ~ (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' ,.,/((Wall Map) Front Office Scale: 1" - 1000' ~(Wall Map) Middle Office Scale: 1" - 1000' c~ (Section Maps) Front Office Scale: 1" - 400' L,X (File Map) Tracina 434 (Valley Zoning Map) Scale: 1" - 1000' N4 (File Map) Metro -~11 (Director's Office) Scale: 1" - 2000' (File Map) County - Front Office Scale: 1" - 1 mile (File Map) County (Map Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Card) Middle Office SOUTH EAST (Wall Map) Building Codes Department Scale: 1" - 1000' tVVa'_1 Map) Front -)fficp Sca1_e: ' - 1000' _('A -i11 Map) Middle Office Scale: I" - 1000' (Section Maps) T'►.-ont Office Scale: 1"- 400' (F-1A '.Vlap) Tracina :~34 (SoL'-h East Zoning Maps) Scale: - 1000" (Fi le Map) Metrc 411 (Directors Office) Scale: 1" - 2 000' ,(F: -e Map) Cour.tv- Front Office Scale: i" - 1 mile _ ,(File Map) Count~. ;TVIap Room) Scale: 1" - 2 miles (Score Cards) Middle Jffice / J0 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE ) CHANGE ZE-41-76, AGRICULTURAL ) COMMISSIONERS' DECISION SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS - Talarico ) This being the time set by the Board of Spokane County Commissioners to render its decision concerning the request of Pete Talarico, West 2332 Sinto Avenue, Spokane, Washington, for the above zone change; and The Board having received the action of the Spokane County Planning Commission as contained in the Commission's minutes of November 12, 1976 which state a motion to approve the request failed for lack of a second; a motion to deny the request failed for lack of a quorum; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on January 6, 1977, at the request of Gary T. Embleton, Attornev fnr Pete Talari co, anc1 after vi s i t ina the site and reviewing the testimony; an The Boa rd be i ng ful 1 y advi sed i n the premi ses ci i d deternii ne, based upon tile testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board, to approve the zone change from Agricultural to Local Business, subject to conditions to be developed by the Planning Staff, one of which shall be a site obscuring fence on the south border of subject property. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, approving said zone change subject to conditions and setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter, for execution at a subsequent meeting. APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 20 day of January, 1977. VERNON W. 0 LAND CLERK OF T BOARD - B Y . ' ~osanne Montague, Deputy k ✓ RECEIVEC) J.°.~! 2 -)1 %J(1l-UVL t'IANNI[VG COMMISSIM BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, STATE OF WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE ) CHANGE ZE-41-76, AGRICULTURAL ) COMMISSIONERS' DECISION SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS - Talarico ) This being the time set by the Board of Spokane County Comrnissioners to render its decision concerning the request of Pete Talarico, West 2332 Sinto Avenue, Spokane, Washington, for the above zone change; and The Board having received the action of the Spokane County Planning Commission as contained in the Commission's minutes of November 12, 1976 which state a motion to approve the request failed for lack of a second; a motion to deny the request failed for lack of a quorum; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on January 6, 1977, at the request of Gary T. Embleton, Attorney for Pete Talarico, and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board, to approve the zone change from Agricultural to Local Business, subject to conditions to be developed by the Planning Staff, one of which shall be a site obscuring fence on the south border of subject property. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, approving said zone change subject to conditions and setting forth more definitively the Board's action in this matter, for execution at a subsequent meeting. APPROVED BY THE BOARD this 20 day of January, 1977. VE RNON W..0 LAN D CLERK OF T BOARD, ~ BY • C~osanne Montague, Deputy ~~k . - -41-76 ~-76 # ix,~ C"Cjt . . _ ' , _ . ~A ; n~ 1 I I -S'' uL~~ y-s , . SPOKANC COUHTY Li:Uf71 HC;USE FORM FOR (PROPOSEDfBXXYW DECLARATION OF (*A2xy&jc&=/NON-SIGNIFICANCE) Description of proposal Zone Change fromAgricultural Suburban to Local Business Proponent Pete Talarico Iocation of ProposalNE 1j4 of SE 1/4 of Sectfon 16, Township 25 N., Range 44 EWM Lead Agency Spokane CountY This proposal has been determined to '(MWAC/not have) a significant adverse impact upon the environment. An EIS ~is/is not) required under RCW 43.21c. 030(21'(c). This decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. Responsible official Mr. Ray W. Christensen Position/Title Chairman, Board of County Commf ssfoners Date /a~ 74 Signature Ojai (3) If the form is for a declaration of environmental significance, the lead agency may add to the information contained in subsection (2) of this section a listing of those environmental impacts which led to the declaration, tcgether with a brief explanation of what measures, if any, could bE taken to grevent or mitigate the environmental impacts of the proposal to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration and issue a (proposed/final) declaration of non-significance. . . , %J BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE ) CHANGE ZE-41-76, AGRICULTURAL ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS,Talarico) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 2:00 P. M., January 6, 1977, at their office in the County Courthouse, to consider the above mentioned zone change upgrading on property located in: Section 16, Township 25 North, Range 44, E.W.M. The East 300 feet of the North 110 feet of Tract 85 of Opportunity NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony either for or against the recommendations of the Spokane County Planning Commission. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 2nd day of December, 1976. UERNON W. OHLAND CLERK OF THE BOARD BY R sanne ontague, Deputy Cl ~ • -lllnrilPt~ tI/ 1iiuc November 16, 1976 Spokane Board of County Commissioners W. 1116 Broadway Spokane, Flashington 99201 Re: Zone Change Application ZE 41-76 Dear Commissioners: Please accept this letter in behalf of my client,, Mr. I Pete Talarico of W. 2332 Sinto, as an appeal from the Spokane County Planning Commission's inaction on Nov- ember 12th of this year in r-egard to my client's ap- plication for a zone change. This appeal is pursuant to Spokane County Code 4.12.091, and the statutory fee of twenty-five dollars ($25.00) accompanies this ap- peal. A memorandum in support of this appeal will be filed with you shortly and copies of it will be sent to each Commissioner to familiarize them with the issues which will be raised at the public hearing on this matter. Yours truly, ~ 3; ~ v,fc,(~(~ ~ REC.EIvEn GARY T. EMBLETON Attorney for Applicant N~V 1 6 jgls Encl. • ~'~;!'►~,'.r , ;~,F~r,~ ~,L ~ :YOV,aF G0:':I' T l-• _ 1 . „ ' - 1 - ?'1 Y ' : ✓':v.:.t:..~ v.:i N . .X,.LP_V 'v~.=il..^ _1..._ TO M;hom It May" 1.1 c"3.z; a 1JT'O'1,J'?-,•-t,~ G ~;I~C?T' 1n t.;:C,' ixi?(1 P! il!'.s :.rt'a vi 61:CiKciilQ ani ama.zed at the school district's attitude concerning the rezoning of the property on Braadway and Hnes. Does not the school district knoW that ~taxes are gained frorc comercially zoned property than from residential' Does the school distriet gain more taxes from its ncor rasidents, alrea. overtaxed for mismanagement in cchool svsfacms, etc construction and operation, On tha other hand, who at current prices--an ; 3,--r& n -r-:r,-? q l? ~r.~~ . (in their right mind) Business has moveu iri aroui:ci aiiu a:;out iay i6 1:,j a rP,;idential area, what with apartment houses, garden 4tores, and dcct~;. offices (baCn '1-G back) bt-hind surrounding my pror,erty. `i'he entirw a~ ;.cor~.-r-rcial. ~at is t?m barb, about an old truek farni area now vacant and useless begin zaned commercial and being liSF:D: The praperty was vacant and desertad when SAFECO decic3ed to enlarge. 7.cul nat t" t-y pe o f s*.ruc ture be ~ter t~'-~an ?:"~'?'h~l`~ G: ocliool ta::e6 coLze `'rom many Ecurces--ana i-t-i l-!e that thr greed from which it comes does not realize this yetZ Being a tax payer for many yaars and not hav g any chidren to benefit---thPra r.as to be a compromise somewhere' , . , Q J , November 10, 1976 To: Spokane County PZanning Commission Re: Zone Change on the corner of Pines and Broadway Dear Sirs: As an owner of property aeross the street from the proposed zone ehange to eommereiaZ on the corner of Pines and Broadway, I wouZd Zike to voice my approvaZ of such rezoning. I feeZ that it wouZd enhance my property at that Zocation, and be eompatibZe with the neighborhood. Thank you. j~ ~ ~ Novemtier 10, 19iC 1 L? Y Q'1? h' CO 7.~ I'G L'✓ Z. ay Z n ~1. nyi Re : Zone C'cange cn the corner o f Pine s ancl Croadway 1' 2 1' 6 : I zvouZd Zike to show my support for the estabZishment of the restaurant at the corner of Pines and Broadway. There are severaZ reasons why I feeZ this deveZopment wouZd be desirabZe. The restaurant tvouZd certainZy eZea up that corner and Zook good. Anything wouZd Zook bettE:- than that vacant Zot whieh does nothing but eoZZeet and debris. The restaurant wouZd be compatibZe with the neighborhood as Zong as no beer was soZd, and its signs were not too fZashy. As to the schooZ board's opposition to the deveZopment beeause of kids smoking in the Zot, it has been the experience on my property across.the streej from the schooZ that the kids smoke everywhere. I eve had to take doran a shed on my property because they were smoking there. AZso, I have never noticed any facuZty member of the sehooZ taking eare of any of these kind of probZems. AgaZn, for these reasons, I voiee my suppor- of this zone change, and urge the pZanning commission to approve it. Thank you. / ~ A 5POKAl'qt VALLU-1 FIRt DtPARTIAENT e~oe 7",e, 6~- / . EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. ~ SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 AIM ~~ezv November 5, 1976 Mr. Dwight Hume, Acting Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington Dear Mr. Hume: A The following zone changes and preliminary-.subdivisions have been reviewed for adequate fire protection: PE-1039A-76 - ZE- 125 -76 - Mains and hydrants,need;to be installed in this area. 7 PE-1045 -76 7 ZE- 117 -76 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this area. , . ; , . , PE- I047 - 76 ZE- 126 =76 - There are,existing mains irr,this area but hydrants will be needed. PE-1049 _76 ~ _ ZE- 128 -76 - Mains .ar1d hydrants need to be installed 1h this area. ► , f ' PE-1050. -76 ZE- 129 -76 - Mains and hydrants need to be,instal l ed in,1h.is area. PE-1051 -76 t. ZE- 130 -76 ~This.-area ,is covered- by adequate mains, and hydrants. PE-1052 -76 ZE- 131 -76 = Mains and tydrants need to be installed in this a`re PE-1053 -76 ~i,_. - ~ ZE- 132 -76 - Mains and hydrants need to be instal l ed in ttiis. area t~ ~ZE- .41 -76 This area i s covered b.y adequate -mains a'nd hydrants . ZE- 11Y--76 "----This area is covered by adequate'-mains and hydrants PRE VEN7' FIRES SA VE LI VES ~ . OfFICE OF TIIE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date 10• 22 ,197~ To - ? Ii Q ~ LT From _=&MN T_._ _ StezE LTtF..3_ Subject 1ONE Ca►W-GF- zT' - 41- 7 L _ N tn'Z : i~LME Rrv ioiw Awo RtsloNc ; , NEaa~WG : Nc~-..~+aEQ ~ Z, ~97~G ~ ~,'o ~r' e'r ~ ' ao rrgo.~ .p% j ro~<r~ ..s'oA 5,4w.1./ J C f4'0r4 1 /C I4 r b<e.Jcl C ~•r O~j/ to~ ~ 7 . At said time and place any interested person may app,-,c" for, or against, the granting of this application. • AGIIVDA, NOVEMBER 12, 1976 TELEPHONE N0. : 456-22i'1 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNIlVG COMNiISSION Time: Friday, November 12, 1976, 9:30 A.M. Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex (Us° Ma11on Avenue entrance) Z C . ._l C~ i _ 2. ZE-41- 76, Agricultural Suburban i,o Loca1. Bu6irie6s a. Location: Section 16, Township 25 N., Range 44, EoW.M. The East 300 feet of the North 110 feet of Tract 85 of Opportunity. . b. Applicant: Pete Talarico , West 2332 Sinto Avenue Spokane, Washington 99201 - c. Site Size: 33,000 square feet . d. Exdsting Zoning: Agrici.il.tural Suburban, established April 12, 1955 e. Proposed Zoning: Loca1 Business f. Proposed IIse of Property: Pizza Restaurant g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 . . 3 • - Qs ' 0 _ . . • . M 'dv E L L~ SiNTO Z~~51 N = O 61,,JTo ~ ..■m -4 > Z ' 0 ' • ` - U) LC 5 MAR 3 ~ . - ~v BO Ofd E . , ~ . t OESMET ~ ci . x 2 QESMET Avc Z~ + cc ~ • ~ ~ ATAL Q ! T E 3 U. a ~ G • t ~ L D O ul • • -j ~ ~ i T' ~ -•r tY I v lr ~ NDR ~ N " s.. i > ~ . . 16 . . , . . - t ~ EL. 2 SCp1LE ' ~ , ~ ~~'o ~:t h : : ~ ~y 1 f'! C 5~~ ~I A W 1' l~.' • ci , ~ ALK I '.E~•4Hiq~?Ss~l+~ ~ ALK ~ AVE ~ODD _ . . t. . ' Q _ : ..~M. ; . W Z OL/Y!' Avt . . ~D ,~,LLEY WAY ~ ~ - Z - • r x 0 . . ~ Z . ~ P,~.carV 4tND ~ :VE V Sri i79i s. D ~Is t 1 O: K . a. ~ X cY z Y RIVERStOE J9 f DEL./993 ~ ~ EL~ ~ SpRAGUERAvE', _ ~ ~ . • - - . . r,- . ~ 2 WASHINGTON STATE pb%°" s" Daniel J. Evans - Governor H-GHWAY COMM SS ON ~ W..A. Bt,»eY_ o;recfor DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS ~~wfinen N~qhwa~ Office of District Engineer l OI N. 2714 Mayfai r Street Box 5299 North Central Station Spokane, Washington 99205 October 26, 1976 Mr. Dwight J. Hume, Acting Director Spokane County Planning Commission North 811 Jefferson Street Spokane, Washington 99201 Spokane County Planning Commission Agenda - November, 1976 Dear Sir: This office is in receipt of the agenda of your November 12, 1976 Planning Commission meeting and would comment on the following itema: ✓ZE-41-76 This office would not oppose the proposed development inasmuch as no access will be permitted onto Pines Road (SR 27). ZE-42-76 This office would question the access onto Division Street (SR 395) at the location indicated on the plat development site plan. It is too close to the physical island for northbound left turning traffic destined for Hawthorne Road west of Division Street. Please notify developer accese permit must be obtained from this Department. ZE-116-76 This office desires that the developer contact thia Department regarding access onto Sign Route 290 (Trent Avenue). If entrancea and exits are to be limited to one-way operation, confusion may be generated with vehicles stopped in through lane of Trent trying to determine proper roadway to enter this buainess complex. V truly pours, W R. RNING, P.E. Diatrict Engineer WRH:rlh RRE cc: HBAshford RECEIVED RREarnest RDBlayden ~ ~ ~ RecordControl,Hqs. 3r%NMYIit +AAO% ►1 r , : ~if•. C:i~arle s Scocl:er Central Valley School District No. 356 ~'our.h 323 Bowdish Roau o~pokane, WA 99206 "L~c,~-rr Mr. S cocker: ►S a developmen4 plan for a Pizza te ;cauranti proposed to be locakod at rhe ;":VV corner of Pines Road and Broadway Avenue, tmmediately north of the North Plnes ;unfor Htgh Sahool. T,ho prnpnrty !n question presently has fihe Agricultural Suburban Zone classi€#cation, !-)ut this nast weok the ownor of the property requested that the existinq zone classiflcation be cbsnged to the Local Business Zone, thus permitting the proposed :'izLa Restaurant. Please condlder the proposed use, review the submltted devebpment plan and amy appropriate co;nments. . Sincerely yours, , rohn T, weltzer Zoning Administrator L;;closL: e Policy 1425 CENTRAL VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT #356 PUBLIC GIFTS TO SCHOOLS It shall be the policy of the Central Valley School District #356 that the Board of Directora may accept on behalf of the echool district and individual schools any gifte, grants or bequeate of money or property. The Board, with the recommendatione from the administration, will determine the suifiability and the utilization of such gifts, monies or properties within the total school program. Prior to solicitation of funde by organizations wiahing to cantribute to the district or individual schools, approval of the Board must be requested and received. Money raised for private purposea such as memorials and scholarahips by students in a private capacity may be accepted by the Board of Directore, and administered ae herein provided for grants or bequests of money. Contributions of equipment, servicea or facilities that may involve major coats for installation or maintenance, ehall be presented to the Superintendent's office for review, prior to Board consideration. Propoeals for the purchase of items on a matching fund bagie, (part of the cost provided by an individual or organization and part by the Board of Directors from public funds) shall not be encouraged. Contributions to the schools become the property of the dietrict, and are subject to the same controls and regulations that govern the uge of other school-owned properties and funds. Adopted by the Board of Directors 6/22/76 At said time and pl any interested person may apl for, or against, the granting of this application. AGENDA, NOVIlKBER 12, 1976 TELEPHONE N0. : 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: Friday, November 12, 1976, 9:30 A.M. Place: Conference Room A, Gounty Court House Annex (Use Mallon Avenue entrance) ZONE CHANGE 2. ZE-41-76, Agricultural Suburban to Loca1 Business a. Location: Section 16, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. The East 300 feet of the North 110 feet of Tract 85 of 4pportunity. . b. Applica.n.t: Pete Talarico • West 2332 Sinto Avenue Spokane, Washington 99201 c. Site Size: 33,000 square feet d. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban, established Apri1 12, e. Proposed Zoning: Local Business f. Proposed IIse of Property: Pizza Restaurant g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Sectiori 4.211.O4U o3V ' MAXW6610 vC .ty s . 3 ~ p . SiNTO Z ; SINr r o~ ~>4 TO 3 ~ I +0 I~, , [r SHA JRt , ~ 3~ I . BooN E Q • t CESMET ' C) DES M ET Av c ~7 L qTAL 0 i Ea I 0 U- ` ~G3 ~DO ~ ~ ~ r ~ -Z' cr - tL, NDRt k > ; , . , ~ 5 . , . , , . ~ EL IEL I ;~ine~:~l~nioir. ~ . d k > > A L K I E,'~`•.H+9~? 1 AvE lODD u A L KI - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ W " Z ul r OLIVE AYl ~ r ~ • ' G ~ %LLEY WAY ~ w Cit. OZ ' . ~ x Z • F 1~ A~l of a 4IN ~ E s MI-SIN v ~ ,w! Ri+-& ~ o Ri s Z. RIVERStOE ; a 3 ~ c x g j x z 3 DEL./993 W Et.79-4 SPRAGUSPAVE' . • 2 7,F211- . / J l. . ) ~Suburban to Local Business on property described as the East 300 feet of the Nor:': i'i;:' feet of Tract 85 of Opport,it~~_ c.-;- S~c-l:ic~1~ 1', P,?, , P,~_,,;~e E.W.~I. , 0;~01iCa?1? COll?1 O?~ Pi Yl-:-~._ ROc d ~iI1d-' A'.'/'I1t%F=~ AF'FIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE QF WASHINGTON ) ) SS a COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ~w t`~~l i LiE 2 , Be:ing iirs-t duly sworn, deposea and says : That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane Courlt,y, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one Year's , That on 10- 2- 2- , 197~., he personally posted three (3) - and correct copies of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the 2.T p ` N Sj-,., C> n0jtM:tj - Z_7O r 7_ S ; 3 eT P- N wCo, o.r Cocs ALk i Subscribed and sworn to me N oTAkY PUBI,IC IN AND FUR SPOKxi,; ~Ct;ri ; T y, ~,~.i:~~, ! Residing at Spokane, Washir. -t'--_ w • ' r EARL MONG DEMOLiTl4N CpNTRACTOR ]0510 EqST BROADWqy SPOKANE, WASHItYGT4N 99206 ~ WAlnut 4-2782 ~ . ~ / , , - t. t • d ~ ~.,~-G - ~ ( i- l ~_L+- l' ~ - ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ CLTIVE a r,,,~,,~►c ,*4Amt r~~~~ • At said time and p ~ any interested person may apt-,o"7 for, or against, the granting of this application. AGENDA, NOVEMBER 12, 1976 TELEPHONE N0. : 456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Time: Friday, November 12, 1976, 9:30 A.M. Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Arinex (Use Ma11on Avenue entrance) ZONE CHANGE 2. ZE-41-76, Agricultural Suburban to Loca1 Business a. Location: Section 16, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. The East 300 feet of the North 110 feet of Tract 85 of Opportunity. b. Applicant: Pete Talarico West 2332 Sinto Avenue Spoka.ne, Washington 99201 c. Site Size: 33,000 square feet d. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban, established April 12, 1955 e. Proposed Zoning: _ Loca1 Business f. Proposed Use of Property: Pizza Restaurant g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 ° 3 V ' + -L-M i. x W v < < .z ; _ . . . . . . . > Ot Q M 'rvEL.L ' Sr,ro Z; I T' = 0 ~61Nro I ~ ~e Z + O . _ tL 5HAR P U); Ayr- 80 0N E OESMETL. ~ i . DESMET Avc ; x E~► O ~ A T a► L O ~ . ~L a0 ~ ~M Or J Y ~ ~ ~ ~ r s.. ~ NDR ~ N > ~ . . ~ 6 . . - ,~,;t. -.i + •EL Z SCALE EF.j; ;Pinli nai;. ~ • ~ k ALK I .E.iq1?_'~l~~ ALK ~AVE MD2 ~ - ~ _ ~ W Z . OLIY6 AvI' < 4 = ,>LLE,Y WAY ~ : Z O MJA►N x ~ ci W F- . aiN AY-E 3. 3. two ~ S I OC r Sri` : ~98 a . 3 X ~ I , ~ RlVER51DE j ~ ~n ~EL.I993 w 9:0 t SPRAGUEPI►vE', ~ _ _ _ . . \ I • . ~ \ ..Tr• J I 2 C APPLICATION FOR SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COP~'[NIISSI:)11 Z O N I N G H E A RI N G Court House, Spokane, tirashington I?ate : S-3-76e ` Application No. : _ ~ - ilarne of Applicant: PE7TE ~Akd R IC4 Street ~,.ddress. 23~~. S/NTO City. SF'~p(</qN67 State, w^j Telephone No.: 328 9526 E,.isting Zoning Classification: Agricultural suburban Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Proposed Z,one Classification; Local business ~'i oposed Use of Froperty; -`-Pp~r`0A. 44a i;~:~ ~;aur•an-~ Legal Description of Property: E. 300 ft of N. 110 ft of Tract 85. Sect. 161 Township 25 N.J. Range 44, i.`. _ Site Size: 100 X 300 ft t3-3, aon qY ft Section: 16 Township; 25N Range: 44 EWM Street Address of Property: Norie. Across from F. 12109 Brnadwq,u `vVho Holds Title to the Property; Pete Talarico, Ralph Talarica and Rose Smith ro ers a sister If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it ? Furnish a letter from a Tit1e Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within z:UO feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. ALL OF THE FOLLOWIiVG QUESTIONS MUST BE AIVSVVERED: 1. Vvhat are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional onin ~ (1) Pro osed widenin o Broa wa 2 • t iner ~ct' pc u ing Ieff, a Mire ~ si na s o nes on~o Broadway. P anning c~riimissions consisten ~o Provi e a corridor between ' • • t wl oca Hus ness Zones, Residential-office zones & Multi-Family zones, (4) Between Sprague AVenue & the Freeway on Pines there has been a tendency D iIanEing ion o gensity rov e;one c anges a ove men i one zone c assif cat ons which are low in nature. (53 Nature of traffic . . . . . . i c , cars per a rave ing nortil an sou ro roatway on North Pines and traff on Broadwa.y exceeds 3,~00 cars per.day going eas t and w proxim ty to high d nsity residential areas in orde~ to provide eas a cess and convenience. Consistent with language contained in Chapter ~.0~,111 2 one eispa° ~and °use ~'las°si?fca~ionayce w ic trictesdiagleZ~oaservelcomm- or a ls ercial a ' • noiTa g R-65Lted a acent to a two family residential,agricultural subLirbar mu ip mi y suUrban, or agricultural district" ~ . 2. vvhat facts justify the proposed zone reclassification based on the advancement of the public hea2th, safety, and general welfare : As relates to the ublic heal h safet a d e e a w a d cons ruc ion o a appy s izza es aurant wou have the fo lowing effect on the surrounding areas in question,. It would clean up the property in au~o~n obil and a comte yW~ldiei sree par ing provided for +0 whi ri woula a M orar bu g Wth 1ar e indows facing northeast Contained within the structure there wotM be no cigarette machines, pin ball machines, pool tables or an other ames which would allow nersons to loiter, e: o mi nig on ay,thru Thursday= 11 AM to 1 AM Friday & Sa~yra nd non to mi~ini~~t~ ~~d~~be T~e~~ t~~d no~ ~Qer 3. vvhat ffect w t~ ropose zone rec as a icense . character of adjacent property : As the Cocnmission has consistently provided for zone changes to classi- fications of a low density nature, we feel this roposal would indeed be low n y, ere wou e no a i iona change on the value and character of ad jacent property as future 2oning only reflects the change in the area that nas y occurre . #2*The ro osed ro rietors of th ro er .50 ars a tra c d ni 'n an articular ~a (ba ed on thei p er tio ir: 8oeur c~ A ene, f aho~ w~ifc~i wouydphave a minimxi ef~ect on tra~fi~ a~rea~Y 13+:;.?.i z i na--P i; esc BA--B320 , , Can a reasonable return from or reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification : ---Abs a ~,u te l _ plot plan or sketch rr►ust be attached containing the following information; (a) Scale of the drawing. (b) North point. (c) All dimensions af property, existing buildings, and proposed buildings. (d) Location of all existing and proposed buildings, or additions, with dimensions to the nearest property line. (e) Off-street parking area. (f) Defined points of access and egress. (g) Date of the drawing. THE NECESSARY FEE NiUST ACCOMPANY THIS A.PPLICATION. The recommendation of the Planning Commission in this matter will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for final action. Any person desiring to contest the recommendation of the Planning Commission must request, in writfng, a hearing before the Board of County Comrrissioners no later than ten (10) days followfng the date of thP public hearing held by the Planning Commission. 7W Zor ot o eel (Signed) ' p~~ a ~ tJ;IT UF 0wiiy-.ic:*, nirl> >►i~,ir~JA,., . ° ,..1,r~lcriiij ( .c,~~ri~-,Y i►~I ,r • ti~~rij( ro, ltttl Ill r:.~~~~cc 11ii„ )►()t1 1~, 1 ~ ~ r~ fl~a~nli~ , 11>>>l it r,t.arm m, 1 r>> n f,rl1v% rert:i.fication of 7'itle Coinpan,y: i hcrcby cc:rta.Fy that thc follorllng 13.st of rLumcU and adcireueea conai:;ting of th L,-, Aarict thR- followl t1fr pi~,c~;,, h~~r. t~~~~ri f,rc:~,rircd ! ram Lhr loi G; t nvmln~lc r erordr, r,ricl in Lo fi.hr, hr-:tt ot m,y Iu►owl.~-dly.v (,orrr( i o Si~,ned by 1~'or 1' I U1',llsl~;)i lJ11'1'.) C)~`J11 l, '1' I'I',l: ~ C( , t 4 (Tx.tle Compuny) fp- o~ '442 va te: Septern"Oer 2)1, 1976 ' Supplemental October 8, 1976 aa'dz Ln;T G13AN'LEE I11 cHAiN - AllDITzUN QF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS Lp►rs J3LK PFRSONS PAYING TAXES (T) , o~ OPpoRTurlIrY I Tj 1 (Ir►jI 1 -1 VI n 0 E7mc MacICa,y , Entit; rf Fa~'c 71, i Ti Etmc, MacKaZl~ r 12021 Broadvaay l/',' e,xecht lle^ t, U ~o~11lA ~c CniiNT PtANNIMG COMMtSSlON feet and ~ pRppERTY OWNERS NOTIFIED e x c ept5t r e e t ~ ~ . ~ ' DATE: LP 0 ~ i I B11; T I 1i) ~1! 1 -11L12 p, Fobert L. Swartz 'rJest 195.7 feet. 76 T Robert L. Swartz / E 12109 Brcadway o t South 1/? . 41 , T 161h J --11113 p North Pines AssociatJcr Southwest 1^ 76 T Linc let F'ed Sav tV. Ln r) 131730 0 195.7 fee t T ~ T ~ 0 T' ' ' (Continued on next page) , 't . ` I l~'~'I ~~I'111J'I`I,I, Iil i Ill~ 111 /11►1I 1 I I ~►i I I'I'I~I, /~fll~ ►~I►I~1~1,;,.~ I ~~I;, i'nYftu. Tn/I , (T) . ' c~ WJ 1 1 1 atli R. ll1iJ ( c 61 ,c. t. r , . . ~ J I c c. I. c 1 (O ~C Pto,y J. Arttzur Iit 4, Lox 290134E7 souL-heaet 1/4 ~ 0 Couer d'AJeiie, Idaho - G3014 T n . `}t n t~~5~i 1-11 ~a ; 0 John G. French ' East C~~0.72 feet 76 , TJohn G. French 4 E 6321 c'th Ave oi We q L 130. TC' 0 fcet of ;outheaet t rr ~ 0 . -ll4 u 0 Cora L. Gerke , Sou th 8r- f'ee t o i 76 T Darrall A. Waller ti E 101E05 13alfotzr Ct. Ncrth 19? feet cf 0 1;ast 111.08 feet 'I' , o.f South 112 0 ol' I i ~ 111-17.~~7 o Cora L. Gerke Ea st 11] . 08 feet j 76) Darroll A. Wa17er w E 1Ul10Gi Da1faur (;t. _oJ f.)puth 7/^ 0 except Ncrth 1 OP fe ei. of' ~ 0 T ~ 0 ~r~ • I ~ I ' o,1 F1flil i, 111 1 11,1111 ,~~t,►~','i~~~► r M nill, i~i;t: ,~►r,.~ i►nY110, Tn Vi c V, c~ A 1 ci V. Vi m Mti i Ii~ ~ I A/ COA U , ~c ~J~. , 1 ~ ~ ► ~I c. c~l _ t' 1 ~ - t ' 'I' "O'Iyerw c.c.d R. I;c.i Ler LL ~ 10-020.-)1I Ea;.: 190.08) ieet ~ . ~ 1 O"out}, L/P exrcpl . No-r L1) 10( fec1. Q tl' 1 (Ir ,i41 - I Ir 0 , , ~ t7 T~ xanlt J`~l . Ccsrri iff R ~.-Ncrth 10( f ee t o.[ '((5 11, G~zc 1~7a~1eras J E tr ] tri 7~t /1ve S~c 0 n.t' South 1/? ,I, ~ 0 '1' o North P3.nes Associa te^ PepinninR a t poi.rif 7i T North Piney Aesociates,) N 1005 Pi.nes Rd, P2ri feet South of 0 Northeast corner T_ t)ience Weet 320 0 feet fherice Sautr T z10 feet thence Eajt 0 3~'0 feet tlience Nc rth f;r) 1'ee t 1 c) poi nt; c-f ~ U t+ef°inni nfT T I I,C--1{e?-tr-,O? 0 Lotae 11 C. Wi ] coa bW&k4*w trde : t f e e t 77 Eai.-], W. Monp E 11403 1 1 t h Ave cif IJc,rt h 1'M fee t- 0 ~ c I 8o t t t h 7 ir ~ l~ * . ~ I,A oI' loItl11111,1. III ~ IIl11f1 i►I~I~I I'I~+~I ( l1) f111{~ 1'n`=f'Irt(, Yit►!! I t'r'1 q - O , ( ! U f { Ll.bl C~ Y ^ ~'1.. G.~ r + c~ 4~ ,l f IC'. ~C _ ~ ~ ~3 .L C7 ~ - 'l, La nc lsL- Fed Sa ti tc Ln QC 008119)1 ~ T,act~! fec 1- r~ c31 ;,tyut h 1,/'e T 0 T ~ 5-')f 2_1 JlJ p MadErn Electric Water Cc.' Tieet 3/~ of North 7; Mcdern Electr~r Watcr Cc Box V1008 I/P oi' ock '7 ( UppUI'tUIll1:y., VJc1 cn ~ 0 9k)i 3.j1 a1sU SOUt1i 1/2 r!' except 4!e R t ) c^8j. 4r' ~ c~ [ eeL c: i Nc.r t h 1,'() T i eet .Gi' and efcept o 14est 130.43 i'ect cf 'r , ,,outn Por.Er fcet and 0 e:ccept Ea,-,,-t 1E'r2. 8C fee t 0 ~ 1 c,11 ?-1rn4 o Mcdern Elec ti ic Wa ter C Vtest 83 fect of 71 ~ -J, McFdern E1eetric: UTater C • P,clx VI008 Edst 339.86 i'eet ol Upportun.Lty, bVash 0 99214 Sauth 1/2 rr 1 ~ U T . , 0 , 10 1,11,"1 IP .1 tll'ntill 1. 111 ( IIn III (W TI I1I11, 011 /,(II) t ~ 1'I I,',r II l`, I'A i l ilt; t' J (f fi_._.. ~ / L `51i r------- tJ"liot 1'ow) ttl. I, : ~ , ~ ~c b1 , I ; ~ ~I ~ I oe I ( t:xc:ep1, NUi`111 0. ~ 445.65 fee t . T 0 0 Jchn VJ. Sati,yer ~ Nc rt h 1/e' tJri t't 1 7' Jc.Il11 W. Sawycr ✓ 1, 1..?3?)I ]it,oadw,y. 0 fcet of Epot 275 T f cet c►1 We t )I ~ 0 . . , r`XC'Cpt St7'eE L T U ~ ,i, 11 013-0,11-13 0 He f-re Co . ~1orth 1/2 of Lc:ren D. Vdo Ld Nr-24 Ainpcnne Rd North 1/P of 'Hcst ~ IE/~ excep~; Eact 0 ?Pr) fee t and exce?L f - 0 l}Jetit 70 feet of . ~ Fn^ t 1100 fee L o~ 'Ac.,rth _ - - 0 116 .Ceet and exce ~t ;;t rce t 0 ~ .l, n ~ ~ ~r • ' ~ I I ,hnrl i'l 1,, iii ( 11l1 {tl ill~lil I~~~~~~ ITH,1, (0) nili) 1.;,,, 1 1 ~I~ ~(►fl; . I'/1 I I!C. 'I'/1 / I,. 1 I' ) ~ _ r . t~ A -3 "rA I v Wr .r i I rc 1 0 Dona ld G. Pr-isl(e , r '1' P.~nr^h~~xcr p,qt r, ~ r~?r):'; C', f NO I ( h 1) f_ i cc~ t r~ 0 ( it f ec t 'a' ~ o ( rl o iy 1 I a 0 1/;) o rwc, t c~ I r,rA 3_f34 Ta r- _ - • 0 John W. Sawyer ' Wc► t rU 1ee i. c,1 ~~11 V~T John W. Saw,yer'- E 1232~4 Brcadway F:act 2P)~::, feet of NUl til 1 ,,r7 of NQ7' tl_ 1/? o f' we q t 4 /1-7 p except Stzeet ~r 0 ~.s - lYA3-0405 ' Uppcrtunfty Chr~~an p Church , West 40 feet of °4 ' Church- Ir Opportunity Chriestian N 708 Pines Rd. Fast 32r- 1'eet oi` , ' Q U~eszt 4/r7- cf' North 1/2 of Nortr 1/'C" p except- Street and South 112 cf ATcrt~ p 1 /2 o f We s t~! ~ , - r ~ 0 I '1' . , i ri c.iIn i iI n 0i,Ii„ t r,I I ~~h 'I' {'I't►I; (0) !1(JI► , A I~I,I'I.~ rn v i ru, 'I'!1 /I-,', (011) n 15543-4406 Opportunity Christian a Church North z of North 84 Opportunity Chriatian , T Church N 708 Fines Rd 1 of South 2 0 T 15543-o410 Gerald L. Auzier 0 Robert h. 0'Hashi 8c " n-zeth G. Red n West 150 feet of L T Pines Manor ✓ N 512 PineQ d South ? of South p 2 and South 2 T of North 2 of p South ~ T 0 - T i 3 165~4~-~l0~ ^ y SVYi~ti~- v p District # 356 Not asseQQed Block 85 except T North 110 feet and o alao except South T 20 feet 0 T - . ~ 16544-olo4 Centra f-V`a ney Schoo p District #356 Not asaesaed East 1/2 except 86 , a, South 20 feet 0 .1, 16544-0101 Rose Smith, Ra1.ph Ta1artco p Pete Talarico,~ l~orth 110 feet B1 ck , T Pete' Talarico J w 2332 Sinto Ave 85 except Street 0 T . . iJATL April 6, 19 76 ZE-41-76 Spokane County Planniric; ,ornrlai s s? o.: ~ounty Court House ~~~U, tlie ulidersiy,i~d property ow,-iers, request tne O'pokane Cour;ty Plannin:, C:omrnissio.l (to co:Z~ider a zorZin-~ plail) or (to ~:Ot1Slr.~, r t~~e ~or~inc; ri~ap) frorr~ -----A.GRICTJ_LTURAL SUBURBAN ----t° on the rollowiriy described propertl E 300 ft ofN. 110 feet of Tract Range 44, E. W. M. - - : - ivAivlL 1-uD i) h-~SS Lt~GAL llESCRIPTION OF PRC)PERTY~ ~rl„f/~ ~ ~ r 15543-0410 , 1. outh1l 2f e~o0thsho hroti f Sout 1 2 Tr 1554~3- 0412 ~ act 84 w ' West ZOO 0 feet of North 116 feet oz' E t feet of North 1 /2 of i~c~-~12 14 Broadwa 1 2 of West 4 (Tract 84) o xcep t ~ ~ Exce t West 0 feet of East 400 ' g p h 116 ft & Except stre~y 1-4 Ap" /23 D~ /3ra, ~ I ~54 - 6815 e • L : . 0.-:. 445. . 65 fe e , 15542-1507 ~ ~ ~ I>- MODL tL' I kic A~-~~ , West 3 5 of North 1 2 Block ; F..~_:_; South 12 Exce t West 128.42 ft of f~rof J020t9t28 tA ef ejtExcett1Eas~t fe - - P~.1 86 ` W@3 f8@t of East 339.8 fPG't r /Y 9~y pjee1 south 1/2 -15542-1504 - 16544-0101 ~ . West 357•3 feet of the Nort: - % • feet, Block 85, Opportunity 9. 1G. 11. 12. I3 14. 15. 1 , ' • LiATE April 6, 19 7 6 y, . ZE-41-76 Spokane County Planniny Commissio,i L;ounty Court housQ Spokane,'vv ashinyton ~ ,Z';i2 O 1 -,i' Gentlemen; " - 'uve, the undersigned proparty owners, request tne Spokane County Planning Commission (to consider a zoninc~ plan) or (to uonsider chanying the zoning map) from ~ o c a( u.s~ ~e SS AGRT!Q-UL~TUML SUBURBAN to on the followin(, described property: E 340 ft ofN. 110 feet of Tract 85, Opportunity, Section 16, Township 25 N., Range 44, E. W. M. Iv YLE Ai7DPESS LiGAI: DESCRIPTION OF PROPE RTY l ~ 7 1 . ~ vr7fi......~ , . C-X c G 2 ~wg IL W, J 'l 7 ~ Q. . ~foy ,v Pi.y~ f J J 76 ro inf ).I. ~ ~ G t ls CGJ✓~H~r' 7'14 t-~!L Lt/, )].c / 4 t~ t~r 4 U F , 3~'~ G►.~ ~~ti, 4 t :'h h ,ti. ~ ~ Tinw t~~~ "r~ ~ • ~ /►/d df4- 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ rr~ c ~ ~ ~ U~rc,►~ r c~ K ~ . , C, 60,7~. • o{ St~ j`7! oTrzu4 z~~ ~ , 1 ~ tLei ` 1V, " ~ P tv, 105'' vff' v C iCC e~► 76 Ova~~; ~ Uavk )~o a.q lt/ ► l~~)' v Sz 6~ T~ c 7~ k~~e( ~v~ • 1q'al Y io. x r ce f~►o /Fa•.e~ ii~ti. c~ c X C c ~ J f r r c. 7~ f74 i 2. -761 o 1°c4rf ; y . s ~ 14. 1S. , . . • , r, ~ . ~ SNERMAN AVENUE OFFICE September 27, 1976 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We have had credit dealings on an individual basis as well as a business basis with Don and Jim Bristol, and Pappy's Pizza. Their personal credit has been very satisfactory, and all business accommodations have been handled in the same manner. Deposit accounts individually and personally have maintained very satisfactory levels, and the success of the business, due to their management abilities, has been very obvious in our community. If you should need further information, please contact us. ~ Very t uly ours,Y ~ Don I. Sauer Manager DIS:gmm THE IDAHO FIRST NATfONAL BANK • P. O. BOX B • COEUR D'ALENE, IDAHO 83814 , t October 15, 1976 Spokane County Planning Commission N. 811 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99207 Dear Sir: This proposal for the rezoning to Local Business of the S.W. corner of Pines and Broadway provides the best opportunity for development on Pines North of Sarague and South of the freeway. There are two reasons for this: 1). access routes going East, West, North or South are con- troled by the light at Pines and Broadway. Persons utilitizing service at North Pines Professional Bldg. N. 905 Pines and N. 1005 Pines laclc., t'his advantage, due to the lack of a traffic light on Cataldo and Pines. 2). Size of the property in question (33,000 sq. ft.). None of the other corners at Pines and Broadway can offer this advantage. With regard to the question of whether a local Business Zone be allowed, let me offer these points: 1). Land use planning cannot be arbitrary. Each piece of property must be judged on its best use to the community. Points, though, that are more i.mportant involve con- sistency involving density. Our proposal would affect traffic less than does the offices and apts. located at Pines and Cataldo. This we feel is a consistent use with those that have already been implemented. 2). With regard to the school: The C.V. school district, like every school district in the county, has school property adjacent to or near areas which are already or are likely areas for the development of local business zones. An immediate example of this is University Elementry School at 16th and University. In 1952, according to the planning commission staff, this property was zoned local Business. In 1955, C.V. School district accepted the completed Elembntary school, just across the street, and began using it. In the 60's a gas station was built on the corner and in 1975 a 7-11 store was built adjacent totIme gas station. Today, according to the owner operator of the 7-11 store, "Our relationship with the school is good." In the city, Shadle Park Shopping Center is directly adjacent to a Junior High. Development of those areas has continued and been successful, Logical areas for development even though near school property has consistently been utilized to its highest and best use. 3). Development of a strictly family dining restrurant of this type in this area is needed to acc- ommidate the high density residential area surrounding this area under consideration. If you should have any questions regarding this proposal, please feel free to contact me or my agent Kenneth C. Thiemann at House of Properties, Inc. Thanking you in advance for your attention to this matter, I remain Very truly yours, Pete Talarico • ~ + ' ~ , . ~ SPOtiANC COUNTv GOUAT HOUSC STATE of WASHINGTON ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT Environmental Checkli st proposal file number T 9POSANS COIINTY PLANNIMti COMMI89ION PUBLIC WORKS BUILDINCi N. 811 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 458-2274 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 . + INTRpDUCTION: The State Environmental Polioy Act of 1971, Chap$er 43.21C, RCW requirea all state and local qovernmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing priv8te proposala. The Act also requires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions aignificantly affectinq the quality of the environmentv The purpose of thie checklist ia to help the aqenciea involved.determine whether or not a proposal ie euch a major act ion , 1 PYease answer thE followinq questions se coatpletely ae you can with the information preaently available to you. Where explanations of your anawers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to qovern- ment deciaion makea, include your explanation in the space provided, or uee addit,ional paqes if necessary. You should include references to any reporta or studies of which you are aware and which are relev ant to the answers you provide. Complete answere to these Zueatione now will help all agencies in- . volved witb your proposal to undert ake the required environmental review with- - out unnecessary delay : The following questiona appl.y to your total propo8al, not juet to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your anawers ahould include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime-.in the future. This will allow all of the aqencies which will be in- volved to complete their environmental review naw, without duplicatinq paper- work in the future. No application shall be process until the checklist has been completed and returned to the Plan Comanissiono State law reguirea exPlanationa for everY "yes" and "maxbe" answer on the checklist and person completing the form may provide explanations for "no" answers-~ NOTE: Thie ie a standard form being used by all atate and local agencies in the State of Washinqton for varioue typee of propoeals. Many of the questions may not apply to.your proposal: If a question doee not apply, juet answer it "no" and continue on to the next, question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM I. BACKGRiOUND 1. Name o! Proponent ,1164-0 2. Addrese arid Phone Number of Proponent :F~ Z3 ,JZ S To , 3. 'Date Chsckliat Submitted lQ-~- • 4. Aqency Requirinq Checkliot 5e Name of propoaal, if applicableii . . R ~ 6. Nature and Brief Description nf the Proposal (including but not iimited to its size, general design eiements, and other factora th will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): I A0-71 .ooo a 13; 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the propoeal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any othPr information needed to gi~ an a^curate understunding of the environ- mental setting of the proposal) : ii~f~fiil ~ l~ ~ w jj~ • A/C ggrL 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 1 _~4 , 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Goveznment Approvals Required for t , Fropo--zl (federal, state and local including rezones): 6 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity re- lated. to ar connected with this proposal? rf yes, explain: • 11,, Do you know of any plans by others w~ich may affect the property covered by your proposa l.? I f yes, exp lain 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- proposal; if none has been completedp but is expected to be filed at some future dGte, describe the nature of such application fortn: . I I ENVI FcONMENTAL I MPACTS ,Exp i anat ions Of al1 "yE'S " dT1d "maybe" dTLwct6 dt@ required' Yes Mabe No 11) Earths Will the proposal result in: ta' Unstable earth conditions or in chan3es in geologic substructures? ~ (,b) Disrupt-iors;, displacements, compacLion or overcoverinq of the soil? ~ ( c.) Chanqe in topography or gro-Lmd surface relief features? (d) The destruction, covEring or modification of ~ any unique geologic or physical feat,ures? ~ !e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, eir.her on or off t.he site? ' ~ (f) Chanqes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changea in siltation, deposition or erosion 1 r ~ Yes Maybe No which may modify the channel of a river or stream v or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? Y Explanation :_fi 7:7zl . ,,j,, ~ ~D v~v, .~•s .f-~-~ B ~ ~'~/u ~`L°, ~.C~ ~ ~ f~'v~ ~1~ ~ ► f (2) Air. Will the proposal result in: (a) Air entissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ~ (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or , temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? gy- Explanation: ,l Ir►p*, ~ Gt N/Dl~yl~ ~ I ~ (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh ~ waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, I or the' rate and amount of surface water runoff? x (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood " waters? ~ ,(d) Change in the amount of surface water'in any water body? ~ (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any altera- tion of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbi - ' dity? ~ (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of qround waters? ~ (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or v excarations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either " through direct injection, or through tYie seepage of leachate, phosphates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other aubetances into the ~ ground waters? (i) Reduction in the amount of water othezwiae c, available for public water supplies? ~ P ~ r`J Explanation: . , W~2~ (4) Flora, Will the proposa result in: (a) Change in the diversity of epeciee, or numbere . of any species of flora (includinq trees, shrubs, qrass, crope, microflora and aquatic plants)? ~ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? ~ I i . Yes MLaybe No (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of ~ existinq species? (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? ' Explanation: n/~~ ~ Q ~ ~ (5) Fa a. W&ill the proposal r /sut in: Inc-~ SC~"~,.•.~s / /`B~s, (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or mi.crofauna) ? ~ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endanqered species of fauna? ~ (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? Explanation: (6) Noise. Will t.he proposal increase existing noise levels? Explanation: 7"-o yoec:jqojd=s Z.J ♦r~ i ~ f A__21~ Q,f ~ o- 61 /17 _0 G,_s (7) Liqht and Glare, Will the propo 1 psoduce new light or ~ qlare? )'l Explanation: ~ AnS 4A4 C"4 _ (8) Land Use. Will the proposal re ult in the alteration of the present or PAa;,ne3 land use of an ared? Explanation: c .0 " ; _ _ (9) Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of nay natural resources? ~ (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? ~ Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited tr oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) ~ in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation : (11) PLopulation. Will the proposal alter the location, dis- tri.bution, density, or growth rate of the human popu- lation of an area? ~ Explanation: (12) Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Explanation: L ~ Yes !!jabe No (13) TransPortation;Circulation, Wili the proposal result in: (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? ~ (c) Impact upon exi.sting transportation systems? ~ (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ~ movement of people and/or qoods? (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? ~ (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? 1 Explanat ion -t ~ .,w ~ (14) Public Serviceso Will the proposal ha an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services~1j:;,w ~ in any of the following areas: (a) Fire grotect ion? (.)D) Police prorection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public fa::ilities, including roads? (f) Ot.her governmental services? Explanation:r~~ ~ • ~ ~ V (15) Enerqy,. Will the proposal result. in: (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? ~ (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require ~ the development of new sources of energy? , Explanation: (16) Utilities, Will the proposal result in a need fvr new syatema, or alteratior,s to the foll.owing utilities: . (a) Power or naturaY gas? (b) Communications sys,tems? (c) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? x (e) Stortn water drainage ? S~ (f) Solid waste and disposal? Explanation : ~~.~1~ ''j' ~,~P' i~f ~C ~ i ` ~ c- ~ LrfL r (17) Human Heal . Will he prop sal result in the creation of to any he alth hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental heal th)? Y. Explanation: , , Yes Mabe No (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open toithe public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ~ Explanation: (19) Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ~ Explanation: (20) Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeoloqical or historical site, structure, object or building? ~ Explanation: (21) Additional Information. III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowle3ge the above information is true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declara- tion of non-siqnificance that it tqight issue in reliance upon this checklist should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. ~ • Proponent : Q_ Q ~on 'h^0 ~ Address: az z~~~~~ Phone : ~ cd Person completing form: 2L C Phone : cl zy-~Y'O Q Date: ~5~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ You are hereby notifi~d, that on ~ ~~~o , at th~ hvur of of ~aid day in Conferenc~ Room A, ~Vlal~on Av~nue En- trance, Spokane Caunty Court House ~nnex, ~pv~Cane, Washington, T~e SPQKAI~E C~JUNTY PLANNI~IG C~}~lllV~IS- SIC~N will c+onduct a ublit hearin to p 9 _ ~ ~=ar~ ~r ~ ~oc~a ~a~r ~ ~ ~r a~ ~ar. ~ ~ arr 'l~~~~~~ 1~'~i'~10~Y~, ~ ~ 1'~ A ~ ~/~11'~M'~' ~i ~•~r1•T6 General destription of area: ~ ~oo ~ .ar ~ ~~c► ~ ~t ~ ~ o~ ~~r~ r~► '~IMIolp~ ~ M., ~R 4~, ~,~Y~II~, ~1 Mf~i~. t1M ~rr~ e~ ~'~r ~d ~i ~ +A~r~) FaR FURTHER DETAILS contact the ~ okane Count p Y Planning Commissian, Public Works Buildin , N. $11 Jeffer- ~ son Street, Spakane, INashingtar~, ~e ~nr~~ ~ ~ Director af Planning Spoicane County Planning Commission PORM 846 PLNO. COMM, 3•63 . S ~ S.:+k q 4 A,~ a,f a e~! ~ . -_m___._._~ _ o~. -..:u " - - _ _ _ _ y _ i~- I C; ~ - A ~ ~ ~ c►,~ ~ ~ - - _ - Y.~ T~' ' J _ 4 ~ ` 1 ~ 1 s ~ p 8v , ` ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~~~I ~~~I ~ i~~~ i~'v d~ ~ ~~r~ ~ . , ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ l~ ~ r ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ! ~ t~ ~ . l.~ , I - i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ »o ' ~ ~ ~ I ~ f ~ ~ ~ b~ ~;~e ~ ~ ~ ~ I, ~ ~ a , ~ ~ M t J i , ~ I l I w i ~ ~ I ; t¢ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~ ~ , i ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ; ~ ~~j ~ ( ( , I~- ~ e~a is~r -1 ~ . - -_1..__ _ .e,t,t~' ~ 1~ 6 ~ ~ L~J ~ ~,~c ~r~'s~~~r.~ ~~,f~'}f r9"~''f, Ns f; ~ ~ 3' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~j ~ar ` ~i~ fc6~B' ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ A~ ~ ~ f 1 ~ ~ ~ a I ~ ~ , 8 ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ - w~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ # ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~t , ~ ~ ~ ` - . r , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r C~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R' ~ ~ ~ I ` r j~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ ~ . ~ , - ~ j ~ ~p. ~ ~ ~ i ~ I - - _ : _L _ L ~ . 1 ~ ,c. - ~ •i ~ti ~ ~ ~ ~ f a~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ATALDC~ ~t . ; '~I'.~~ ~ ° ~ ~ ' # ~ ; r ~ t~►) ~ , i ~,s I r ~ ~~I ~ ~ ~ ~ WILLA~G~ . ~ ~ ~ ' ; ~f ' ~ ~ ~d ~Q~~~'~ ' ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ f,~ ~ ~ , _ ~ ~ _ . - ~ ' , , ~ 1~. ,1~, 'r ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~rtr-~ ~ . ~ ~ . 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , _~..1 ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~ ~ ~ , I ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ I ~ ~ ~"~.'lS~i''~''~" d~ ~ ~ ~ ..y i I ~V,1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I . ~ "T+ , ~w~` ~ , ~"y~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ , r ~,~P~~~ ~ ~ _ . i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j- , r ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ I : ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ WI ~ ~ ~ ~ I . . I ~ ~ ~ } , ~ ~ _1-~_ _ ~ a ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N , , ~ _ ; . s , . _ _ ' L 6~`~ ~ _ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ _ _ _ ~_t_ _ . ~ . _ . - P~ _ _ ~ ~w . ~a ~ ~ ,~~~~,a . I y ` y ' ~ , r ; . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ` ~.ac ~ - 1~ ; ~ ~ ! _ ~ ~ , ! Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ ~ Q . ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . _ ~ ~ ~ . • ~ , . . _ _ _ .~I ~ 1~~ ScJ~$~1 ~ ~ - ; ~ ~ ~ ~ I . ~ ► ~ ; , ~ ° ~ ( ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ y ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ ~ ~li ~ ~ ~ ~ '~Z ~ ~ . J ` ~ z ~ ~ ~ ~6 ~ ~ r _ . _ ~ ~ ~ c~ ~ ` ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ _ , .---o ~ ~ ~ C~ ~ ~a ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.s. ~ .w. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ 4 _ ~ ~ C~ - ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - _ ~ ~ , .~p ao_~~~~'t~..~_---___-~_--... ___rw_____-.,__ ~ ~ f~0 ~ j ~_i _.~~.F _ . ~ . - - ~dG ~ .f' - 9 bJ? • 98 ~ li' i ~ ~ T~, , ~ ~ E~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ .1~. I ~ I ~ , ~ ~ ~+D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - r ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~....b~ . ~ ~ ~ ; ~ r~ ' ~ ~ ~ :~-i-~ ~ . , , ~ 3. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ f ~ . f ~,~t I ` - , ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~~J ~ - ~ ~ ,~ts~ l.t~ I ?~G ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ...y~. ~ .r-~.. ~ ~ ( I ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ --.~7'~' 'T ~ , ~ ~ I~ I ~ ~ 1 ~ i-.- ~ " ~ av~ I ~ ~ i ~ i ~ M~ I M ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ p ~ i ~ ~ f ~ ( r ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ w , i~ ~ . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r i7 , ~ M ~ ~+r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M, i ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ E ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! I ~ I ( • I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M~ I ~ ~ I . . ~ ~ II I I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ , i ~ ~ ~ ~e I ~ . ~ , ~ . ~ C~ . ~ r ~.~.L.~ _ ~~s.~- _ ~ f ~ ~ ( y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ 1.~; 7~ ~ ~r J'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~..:.J