The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-46-76 i/ - - ~ l ~ ML - Es - Loc, r~ - ~ W04FLANC) /AIC - ,f PLANTJING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACTION DATE ACTION TAKEN RECORD OF ACTION . . JOA/E ~ ~ ~E u ~ ~v ~Y E-r DA= aqJ , a-tait . b Aff-cAL- . x ~ . oirA . ~ , - , . 'z / ~ ~ ^ - AGENDA, JUNE 11 1976 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2274 f , ~ SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTE CHANGE OF HOIIR Time : Friday, June 11, 1976, 1:30 P.Mo Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex ZONE CAANGE " 4• ZE-46-76, Two-Faraily Residential to Local Business and Residential Office, a. Locatlon: Section 9, Township 25 1Va, Range 44, E.W.M. Lots 1, 2, and 3. Block 1 of Stoneridge Subdivz.sioav b. Applicant: Wolfland, Inc. South 717 Pines Road Spokane, Washington 99206 c e Site Size: 43,817 Square feet d. Existing Zoning: Two-Family Residential9 established February 7, 1974 e. Proposed Zoning: Local Business and Residential Office f. Proposed use of property: Office and convenience grocery store , g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4e21, Section 4.210040 . • E U C L. i O 1AV E rl•~ , _ RlGK ~ . - ~ _ I viLPW . m . ~ - w • ~ b su W~ ~o 3 - c~- - , t Q v`t! MARIE i TAt A 5 AEM N ~ 6n - 1' .ara o a' ~ a~ NCMLiSt.B CC Q 1 b ~ . tn Q ~ i0 9 > ~ W ~ey'co N h ~ m ~ 6 9~ ^l M A ELD , . ~ RNqN~v _ EL /9,65 SH~,Nroor~e , PdE - , .vw i- Ltew..~► ` ~ . • rs-s~ , MONTG01~1E3iY OR +s~,... - ~ STAR , . y ~ ` PRtMARY 0M o :~iA ~p ~ C]o 17 l ~ , ~ . ~ Ivi-INUTES n 17 ~ JUNE 11, 1976 ZONE CHANGE 4. ZE- 46- 76 TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LGCAL BUSINESS ANI} RESIDENTIAL QFFICE: tiV OLFLAND, INC. Planntnq Commisslon Recommendation: Dany, both the Local Business and Residenttal Offtce Zone rectuests for the followinQ reasons: ('Vote was unanimous) A. Bl•sCKGRCUND : The advertised property Is situated on the northwest corner of Pines Road and Marletta Avenue. The appllcant proposed to construct a 4480 square foot offtce complex on the North 180 feet of the described property, and a 1, 920 square foot convenience grocery store on the South 140 feet of the property. , The appltcant's request was to change tho North 180 feet of the described property from Two Family Resldential to Residential 4ffice, and to change ~he South 140 feet of the described proparty from Two Famlly Residentlal to Local Business. REASGIVS: . 1. The Spokane County "Zoning Plan for Pinos Road Between the Freeway and Trent Avenue", inidcates that the properties with Pines Road Frontage between the Northern Paciflc Ratlroad rlght of way and 1Vlarletta Avenue are approprlata for resldential uses. The Planning Commissfon notes that thQ rIorth Pines Study delineates 2onirg along Plnes Road as follows: a. Between the Northern Paciffc Railroad right of way and Marlett3 be indic3ted as a low density residenttal area centered around the Trent Grade School: (Single and Two Family Residen- tial). b. Between Marfotta and Nansftetd Avenues (both sides of Pines Road) be indicated as high dznsity residential area: ( Multiple Famf ly Residanti3l). c. Between Mansfield and Sh3nnon j) venues (both sides of Pines Road) be indicated as a freeNay commercial or residential office area. - 50 - C r Z£-46-76 TVv-C FAM1ILY RESIDEh 1'IAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL, CFFICE: "h GLFLARTD, INC. (Continued) NOTE: The Board of Counry Commf ss i oners concurred with the Planntng Commission's recommendation to accept and approve the Plannfnq Staff's study of iVorth Pines Road between Trent Road and the Spokane Vailey Freeway. The Board further concurred that the ComprehensLve Plan for the Valley be chanqed to reflect future iand use as outlined by the Planning Commisst on's Study and Zoning Plan. 2. The zoning plan for Plnes Road between the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way and Marietta calls for residential uses of those properties. The Text Portton of the ComprBhensive Plan for Spokane County defines residential as a land use slement destgned to serva existing and future dwellfng units. Areas designed for residenttal purposes are to remai n free from commercial and industrtal uses. . 3. The Ptannlnq Commission has not encouraged the proliferatton of Local Business Zoning along North Pines and the staff c oncludes that the smalt business site would be an unwarranted intrusion Into the resldentfal neighborhood. NOTE: The advertised property is surrounded on three sides by residential development. 4. It was noted that the Planning Commissi on has been recently approv- inq Resldential Office requests on North Pines Road between I-90, south to Sprague Avenue, Also, the "7oning Ptan for Pines Road Between the Freeway an3 Trent Avenue" recommends R2sidential Office uses for property along Pines, south of Mansfleld to Shannon 1- venue, but not north of N:ansfiold aLong Pines Road. (See vlcinity map of the agenda). B. STAFF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: A s required ln WAC 197-10- 320, the staff of the County Pl anning Commis- ston revlewed the envrionmen~al checkltst submitted by Mr. F. V. Seipp tn behalf of V4 olfl3nd, Inc. for a zono ch3nge to allow construction of a convenLence Grocery and office complex. The proposal is located approximately fn the E 1/2 of the IVE 1/4 of Section 9, Township 25N., Range 44 EViM frontlnq Pfnes Roa.d, south of Buckcye Avenue. The pro- ponent is requesting a zone change from Two Family Residential to Residential Office and Local Business to allow the consruction of a convenience qrocery store and an offfce bullding on a site of just over one (1) acre in size. Thz sfte is located on relatlvely flat terrain with an unmanaqed grass land vegetation cover. The -staff evaluatfon identlfied only cna potentially major lmpact area, that of increased motor vehlcie trafftc an4 *he secondary Lmpacts therewith. This would include such impacts as :xt reased air pollutton(carbon monixide - 51 ~ ( ~ t ZE-46-76 T14VO FANiILY RESILEIvTIAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND RESIDEi+JTIAL, GFFICE: VvOLFLAND, INC. (Contf nued) and suspended particulates), increased notse lavels, and the increased pubtic safety h3zard of vehicle accidents. However, due to the relatlvely small sizo of the proposal, these impacts are considered insignificant. The concluslon of the revfew of this envlronmental checkllst is that no significant environmental impacts will likety result from the proposal. Therefore, it is recommended that a Declaratton of Non-Significance be Issued and an environmental impact statement 4ot be required. C. GENERAL DATA: l. Location: Sectlon 9, Township 25N., Range 44, EV1t'M Lots 1, 2, and 3, biock 1 of Stonerldge Subdivlsi on. , 2. Applicant: V~ olfland, Inc South 717 Ptnes Road Spokane, v1iA 99206 3. Site Size; 43,817 square feet 4. Existing Zoning: Two - Family Residential, established Feb. 7, 1974 5. Proposed Zoning: Local Business and RQSidentt3l Office 6. Proposed use of property: Oifice and Convenience grocery store. 7. Application of Zonfng Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 rn I I SEPTEMHER AGENDA rPOKANE COUNTY COIIRT HOUSE sPOxArTE couNrY PLarnvII aMMisszoN k 8-1551, EXt e 220 - 221 Time: Thursday, September 26, 1968, 0:00 A.M. Place: Assembly Room, County Court House ZONIlVG STUDY AND PLAN 8e ZE-37-68, Zoning Plan for Pines Road between Freeway & Trent Road a. Location: Sections 3, 4, 9, & 10, Township 25 No, Range 44 The West 300 feet of Sections 3 and 10 and the East 300 feet of Sections 4 and 9 lying between Interstate Noo 90 (Spokane Valley Freeway) and Trent Road. bo Applicant: Spokane County Planning Commission County Court House Spoka.ne, Washington co Site Size: Approximately 70 acres do Exi.sting Zoning: Agricultural, established April 24, 1942 ~ eo Proposed Zoning: The staff will make a report to the Planning Commission on the results of a study of the area pertairung to present land use, topography, soil conditions, etc, and will recommend a zoning plan which will incorporate the results of the studye fo Proposed IIse of Property: To be determined go Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4021 t~E~y f tvC(.r6 hAi2v ie W , GkA~ E ~ :a i fe~• Buc.KEV& IUbR*fN . /aba' ' - - - M4R1CT1'A Z rf ~ ~ ~ 13 vHANS~~~Lp ~ F/A NNaN S~t D.ZA ~.iq ~ ~ r"l~t F w/' y ~ sTIQ TE' 4~ - P` ~ ~ pc NT ~ ~ T La w0to~~`h~ ' ~ . tU o'LT c si ~ rr11 L~ ~ -S - A~' ~ - c~` ~co+J ~,-~-Er~ N r~'1AfL~ - ~ ►'N ~ _ Vj ~ r•~' . . w ~ W ~ • . - ~ ~ r Cp u ~wi ~ s~ ~ N -ii-A CLS. v~ Z°rul , . .2 . ~ ~ 5xcs4l ~ ~ ~s~9 ~ ~ • ~ i~.Ow ~ " ~ ~ _ l . ~ ~ L ? ~ Z,o s L~ jA? G ef QI 1 J~ ~ ~M~J~/1~'~fJ _ , ' c,~ Al ~ 31 1'„1 . y ~ 'Ta T Q~ r\J . ~ ~ nP 0 0 _ . . N 20 ~ c7- 7 :3 0 Z ~ F7 0-0 _ Applicants request w,-,-is to change the North 180 feet of the described , progerty from Two Family Residentlal to Residentfal Office, and to change the South 140 feet of tha descrtbed property from Two Famfly Residenti3l to Local Business. F F7 I ~ Qoa,Tid~ Lp►IN Co S~ ZF, I--l PRsGe§t Oy4 L. Or-PIG A.E." ~`•1 - ~ ~.1 g Lor.^t.. Q • . 44 f 5 ZO t~ Q , r3 P,E:A'SCPPJS b2 V.0, Ta7U, PjA01V0.,, 2cA A v,~ _ s~ T povywv4j Q p c~ 1 - • &.c. • ~ OfF1CF 0F TbE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING pFpART MENT Da t• January 3 ~ q 80 To FILE, ZE-,46--76 From Chris Wesche Subject Zone Chanqe Established fran 'Itrio-Family Residential to Residential Office. (See File ZE-11-77). 'I'he same legal originally advertised for the zon~ng proposal, ZE-46-76, was changed from Ztao-FaQnily Residential (R-2 ) to Residenti.al Of f ice zoning at a subsequent hearing and File No. ZE-11-77 was used.'I'he zoning becaQrie ef f ective March 10, 1977 per Board of Qounty Crnmissioners' Resolution No. 77-259. . ...W. ~ . . ~ FRA TH& DESK OF: . . ROSANNE MONTAGUE . November 8, 1976 T0: DWIGHT HUME/PLANNING DEPARTMENT MAY WE PLEASE HAVE A VICINITY MAP SHOWING ZON I NG OF SURROUNDI NG PROPERTY. Thank you. R E C E I V E D . 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNiNG DFPARTMENT ; ; 4/7 ~ . . ; , - . 000, t E. - . _ . . . . . . . , , . - • , . 's: . . . ,s. . . ,.„iV, P,~''"'Y"~`.• ~ . , . . . _ . - I . w . ' ' • . . , ' . 1 / 8. Z E- 3 2- 6 8- AG RI CULTur.nL SUBURBAN TO P-iULTI PLE I'~MLw, SUi3URBAN : GUNN IIv G The Board concurrec3 wi.th the Plannino Ci, ssion's recar~n~ndation to approve the zone change frorn Agricultural Suburban to Multiple r amily Suburban and adopted Resolution ivo. 68-468 in accorclance therewith. 9. ZE-33-68 - RESTP.ICTED INDUSTRIAL TO :~UJLTIPLE F,AMILY SUBURDAN, OR RCIAL: T:;.e Board concurred t,rith tize Planning Comnission t s recommendation to approve the zono change fram Restricted Industrial to Corrmercial and - ._r r' E "ed Resolution No. 68-469 in accordance therewith. Lu ~--:~~-68 - T-IULTIPLE FM-IILY SUBURbAN TO RE-SIDEPJTIAL OFI'ICE : , DELIiER1 CURPOI'~fi7'10i4 'rne Board cancurred with the Planning Comzaission t s reconawendation to approve the zone change fram ;:ultipls Farai.ly Suburban to Residential 4ffice and aclopted Resolution I1o. 68-470 in accordance therewith. 11. G;I-35-63 -~~'~JLTIPLE FA:-iiLY SULU'.EAN TO cM;IERCiAL: rATTSON T'ne Board concurred z,Ti th the Planning Co:rmission t s recorcmlendation to ; approve the zone change fra-a t•iultiple Family Suburban to Cannnercial ~ and adopted Resolution 'LN0. 68-466 in accordance thereti,rlth. 12. ZS-36-68 - AGRICL'LTURr'LL TO M-STRICZ'E-D RESIDIL"NTIAL OR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDEIvTIAL: PLAi3NING C01-24ISSZOr: (Glennaire Terrace FourL« n~lc:itia:~) ~ The Board concurred i,rith t;ie Planning Coi,-4-aission's recor=endation to approve the zone change 4'ron Agric-altural 14--o Single Family Residential (R-1) and adopted Xesolution No. 68-465 in accordance thereuitn. 13. ZE-37-68 - ZOyING PI~~S FOR PINGS ROAD BETMZE211 1'liE FREE:-JAY AIM 3'RENT ~ ROAll : PLAMING M.,14I S S I ON T''he- Board concurred with the Planning Comaission's recom:►endation to accept and Approve the Pianning sCaff's stwdy of North Pines Road ' between Trent Road and the Spokane Valley Freeway which is delineated on the study map 18beled, "Zoning F1an for Pines Ro3d bettizen the Freeway and Trent Roadt", on file in~ the oftice of the PZanning Com.mission. Tne Board further concurred that the Comprehensive Plan for the Valley be changed to reflect futuZ-e land use as outlined by the Planning Comani.ssion's Study and Zoning Plan. .r • , : , _ - , • ; • . , . . ~ , ' , • . ~ . , , ~ r BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZE-46-76, TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LOCAL ~ COMMISSIONERS' DECISION BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE - ) Wolfland, Inc., Applicant ) This being the time set by the Board of Spokane County Commissioners to render its decision concerning the request of Wolfland, Inc , South 717 Pines Road, Spokane, Washington, for above entitled zone change, and The Board having received the recommendation for denial from the Spokane County Planning Commission as contained in the Commission's minutes of June 11, 1976, and The Board having conducted 1ts own public hearing at the request of the Applicant, Wolfland, Inc., and after visiting the site and revlewing the testimony, and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence availabie to the Board, to uphold the recommendation for denial of said zone change. The Board found the reasons for denial expressed by the Planning Commission as contained in the June 11, 1976, minutes to be sufficient and controlling BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 12 day of August, 1976 UERNON W OHLAND Clerk of the Board by Ros nne Montague, Deputy Cle ~ ~ r 3 •w p OCT 2 ' 7 1976 O =4 F Sr A IT INC S 717 PINES ROAD . SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99206 . (509) 928-4220 RE G~ IVE D O C T 2 7 1976 COI'ftl1 Y UU'viivilSSIONERS October 25, 1976 Harry Larned, Esq. Spokane County Comm ssioner Spokane County Courthouse W. 1116 Broadway - Spokane, Washington 99201 Re: ZE-46-76, Two-Famiiy Residential to Local - Business and Residential Office Dear Sir: We have studied the minutes of the presentation by the planning staff to the County Commissioners in this appeal hearing. Erroneous information as to what the zoning presently is between Marietta and Mansfield was offered. We find there is considerable zoning for residential office North of Mansfield on the East side of Pines Road. We had petitioned for a combination of local business and residential office zoning, but would accept a change to residential office on the entire parcel. On the basis of the contents of this letter, we appeal for a rehearinq 6(/ - and/or appropriate action. iVz' Very truly yours, WOLFLAND, INC. ~ #ofhe I Alvin J. Chairman Board AJW/bt Enc. ~ r y~ f LM WiOLFfI ALVIN J WOLFF, INC REALTORS Complete Rea/ Estate Serv►ce ~ u~ _ • ~ ~ a~w r ~e r L~ ~1 +r ~ Njf~^~~ I 1 ~.J ~{'S-5 - r{t Y s j MV C - - - ~ ~ f . SPOKANE GOUNjY GOURT MQUSC i S,TATE ofWASHINGTON EIVVIRONMENTAL POLICY'ACT, Environmental, Checklf st t S~ ~ proposa, ? /jz7- ftle number ' ~ SPOSAr4Z COIINT'iC PH.AIoTIqIrT13 CObSMISSHOr4gi PUBLIC WORKS BUILOING N 811 JEFFERSON STREET PHONEj 456-2274 SPOKANE WASHINaTON 99201 INTRpDUCTION: The State Environmental Poligy Act of 1971, Chap#er 43.21C, RCDO requires all state and local governmental aqencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing priv8te propoeale. The Act aleo xequires that an EIS be prepared for all major actions eignificantly affecting the quality of the environanente The purpoee of this checkliat ia to help the aqenciea involved determine whsther or not a proposal ie such a nia3or action. Please answer thE following questiona se completely aa you can with the information presently available to youo Where explanattQns of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to govern- menr decision makee, include your explanation in the space provided, or use addit ional paqes if necessarye You should snclude referencee to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relev ant to the anewera you provide. Complete answers to these questiona now will help all agencies in- volved with your proposal to undert ake the required environmental review with- - out unnecessary delay. , The followinq queations apply to your total proposal, not juet to the licenae for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be cauaed by youx proposal when it is cotnpleted, even though completion may not occur until some~titne in the futureo This will allow a11 of the agencies which will be in- volved to complete their environment8l review now, without duplicatinq paper- work xn the future. % . No application ehall be process until the checklist has been completed and returned to the Plan Comissiorae State law requires explanations for everY "Yes" and "maybe" anawer on the checkliat and person completing the form may provide explanations for "no" answersA NOTE: Thie is a standard form being used by all ,state and local agencies in the State of Washington for varfoue typee of proposalse Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal.. If a queetion does not apply, juet answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGRAUND le Naane of Proponent W6LFG&&ZD 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: ~ 3o *Date Ch0vkliet Submitted r 4. Aqency Roquirinq Checkliet S. Name of proposal, if applicable;. , 6. Nature and Brief DescriptLOn of the Prapasal (including but not limited to its eize, general design elenients, and other facto s~hat will give an accur to understandinq of its scope and naturel: ~ - - ~ ~ .Mcz 7. Location of Propo6al (describe the priy9ical setting of the proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by sny enva.ronmental s.mpacts, including any oth~er information needed to give an a:-curate unders-~nding of the e viron- ment al settinq o f the propos al) : " 8. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: f ' 9. List of all Permits, LicEnses or Government Approva e!Ouired for the ~ PropoLal (federal, state and local in cludinq rezones): ^c OA:46 I 10. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity re- late to or connected with thia prop a? If yes, explain: , ..~s * S~ . • ~ llo Do you know of any pXans by others which may affect the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain: , 12e Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the pro- proposal; if none has been comp letedo but is expected to be filed at some f4ture date, describe the nature of such application form. , II ENVIFcONMENTAL IMPACTS ,Exp 1 anat ions of al 1"yes" and "maybe" anwers are required) Yes Maxbe No (1) Earth s Will the proposal resu]lt in. (al Unstable earth conditions or in c:hanges in geologic substructures? (b) Diaruptiox+sF displacements, compacLion or overcoverinq of the soi 1? (ci Chanqe in topoqraphy or ground surface relief features? ~ (d) The destruction, covezing oY modification of any unique geologic or physical features? ~ (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? ~ Sf) Chanqes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion 1 ~ Yes Mavbe No which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? X Explanation . (2) Air. Will the proposal result in (a) Air enussions or deterioration of ambient air quality? ~ (b) The creation of objectionable odors? ~ (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or re o a 1? 7` Explanation : . ~ . ~ CL~ (3) Water. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ~ ,(d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? ~ (e) Discharge into surface waters, or in any altera- tion of surface water quality, including but not linuted to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbi - dity? ~ (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? ~ (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or throuqh interception of an aquifer by cut9 or excarations? (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosph ates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the ~ ground waters? ~ (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for ublic water supplies? ~ Explanation : e,6N IA:WU. ~~~a - ~y.~ r~`+ ~ ~fl (4) Flora. Will the proposal result in: (a) Chanqe in the diversity of apecies, or numbere of any speciea of flora (including trees, shrube, grase, crope, microflora and aquatic plants)? ~ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? ~ ~ t ~ Yes !jaybe No (c) Introduction of new species of f lora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existinq species? ~ (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? Explanation: (5) Fauna. Will the proposal result in: (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of fauna (birds, land animals includs.ng reptilea, fish and shellfish, benths.c organistns, insects or microfauna) ? ~ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endanqered species of fauna? ~ (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of f auna? ~ (d) Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? ~ Explanation: _ (6) Noise. Will e p o osal incre e exis ing noise 1 els? ~ . . . . l.~ Explanation: ~ c. L.~ (7) Light and Glare. Will the proposal psoduce new light or qlare? ~ • . .1 Explanation: '&Z Y"A A -W (8) Lanc~ Use. Will e proposal result in t e alteratioa of the present or lar,ne3 laz 1 uSe o~ an ~ red? Explanation: (9) Natural Resources. Will the propoeal result in: (a) Increase in the rate of use of nay natural resources? (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation: (10) Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited tc- oil, pesticidea, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? ~ Explanation: (11) P~o ulation. Will the proposal alter the location, dis- tribution, density, or growth rate of the human popu- lation of an area? ~ Explanation: (12) Housincj. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housinq? ~ Explanation: t i Yes Maybe No (131 TransportatLOn/Circulation, Wili the proposal result in: (a) Generation of addits.onal vehicular movement? ~ (b) Effects on exiating parkinq facilities, or demand ~ for new parking? ~ (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? Y~ (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? (e) Alterations t4 waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, ~ bicyclists or pedestriaqs? Explanat ion GO AK& Alm -A ~ . . • • L~"~ . (14) Public Services o Wil L the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of thE fol lowing areas : (a) Fire protection? ~ (b) Police protection? (c) Schools? (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? (f) Other governmental seryices? ~ . . ~ Explanation. . . . Q (15) EnerqY. W 11 the proposal result in: (a) UsE of substantial amounts of fuel or enerqy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? ~ Exglanation: , (16) Utilitiesa Will the proposal result in a need for new syeteme, or alterations to the followinq utilitie8: (a) Pawer or natural gas? (b) Communications systems? (c) water? (d) Sewer ofr septic tanks? (e) Stortn water drainage? (f) Solid waste and di posal Explanation : ~ Aff ~ ~0 ~ L4 G• • (17) Human Healtho WiYl the proposal result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excludinq mental health)? Explanation: k . . . ~ Yes MaYbe No (18) Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any s,cenic vista or view open tolthe public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ~ Explanation: . , (19) Recreationo Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational ~ opportunities? Exp lanation: (20) Archeoloqical/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a significant archeological or historical site, structure, ob3ect or buildinq? ~ Explanation: (21) Additional Information e III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, state that to the best of my knowledge the dbove information ia true and complete. It is understood that the lead agency may withdraw any declara- tion of non-eignificance that it might issue in reliance upon ths.s checklist should there be atiy willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part. n Proponent: Addresas Phone: . Person completinq form: ~ Phone : Date: . ~ Oct.,' J r ~ v 24, ~ 3 ~Ct? (40 I . ~ . BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZE-46-76, ) TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO LOCAL ) NOTICE BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE - ) OF WOLFLAND, INC. ) PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 2 00 P.M on Thursday, July 29, 1976, at their office in the County Courthouse, to consider the above mentioned Zone Chane on the following described property Section 9, Township 25 N, Range 44 E W M Lots l, 2 and 3, Block 1 of Stoneridge Subdivision NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony either for or against the recommendation of the Spokane County Planning Commission BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this lst day of July, 1976. VERNON W OHLAND Clerk of the Board b Ro nne Montague, Deputy Cl k PUBLISH The Falls - 7/16 R ECIE. IV ED JUL G S!•u"VE OOUia (Y N° PIAtVNUM OOIVIMISSION S + .1 AA c O Z F Z A N~ INC E 11305 SPRAGUE AVENUE . SPaKANE, WASHINGTON 99205 . (509) 926 9521 Rkc- tI VED ~ JUN 21 1976 COUNTY CUNIMISSIONERS June 21, 1976 . s Board of County Commissioner Cf0 Spokane County Comnissioner's Office W. 1116 Broadway Spokane, Washington 99201 RE: Zone Change ZE-46-76 Dear Sirs: We wish to appeal the decision rendered by the Spokane County Planning Commission on June 11, 1976, pertaining to the above referenced zone change. We feel this decision was based on an outdated study for this area, from 1968. Apparently no thought or consideration was given to the changes and needs of the people. This area, having a higher than normal density of population due to multi- family construction, needs a convenience store at this t1me. Thank you, WOLFLAND, INC. e~ . V. Seipp President RECA.IV E 1`6 v~ ^ r * A41f1 N~'71t~fY JW3 J ALVIN J WOLFF. INC REALTORS Complete Reai Fstate Service PLMN'IRi AI~ MMMI` `'ON ZE-46-76 ~ k ^ ~ •~-~i ~ ~ i 3 I ` L i . ` i i ~ r SPOKANE COUNTY GOURT HOUSE FORM FOR (PROPOSED/FgNAW DECLARATION OF (3-Z6NI-1}Ie"X%E/NON-SIGNIFICANCE) Local Busines s and Description of proposai Rezone from Two-Famfly Resfdentfal ta Residentfal Office proponent Wolfland Inc., Mr. F. V. Seipp Location of Proposal E 1/2, 1VE 1/4, Section 9, Townshf p 25N., Rancte 44 EWM Lead Agency SpOkane County This proposal has been determined to '(hade/not have) a significant adverse inpact upon the environment. An EIS fzs7'is not) required under RCW 43.21c. 030 (2'1(c) . Tr,is decision was made after review by the lead agency of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file taith the lead aqency. Responssbie Officiai Ray W. Christenson position/'ritle Chairman of the Board of Countv Commissioners Date Siqnature (3) If the form is for a declaration of environmental siqnificance, the lead agency may add to the information contained in subsection (2) of this secta.on a listinq of those envs.ronmental impacts which led to the declaration, tcqether with a brief explanation of what measures, if any, could bE taken to grevent or autigate the environmental impacts of the proposal to such an extent that the lead agency would withdraw its declaration and issue a (proposed/final) declaratfon of non-eiqnificance. IN'iINUTES jUNE 11, 1976 ZO1VE CHAIVGE 4. ZE-46-76 TV4'O FAMILY RESIDEIVTIAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND RESIbENTLAL OFFICE: WOLFI,AND, INC e Pianninq Commi'sslon Recommendation: Denv, both the Local Business and Resfdential Office Zone requests for the fotlowing reasons: ('Vote was unanimous) A , BACKGRCUND : The advertised property is situated on the northwest corner of Pines Road and Marietta Avenue. The applicant proposed to construct a 4480 square foot office complex on the North 180 feet of the described property, and a 1, 920 square foot convenience grocery store on the South 140 feet of the propertye The appltcant's reciueet was to change tho North 180 feet of the described property from Two Family Residentiat to Residential Office, and to change rhe South 140 feet of the described property from Two Family Residential to Local Business. S REASONS: 1, The Spokane County "Zoning Plan for Pines Road Between the Freeway and Trent Avenue", inidcates that the properties wfrh Plnes Road Frontage between the Northern Paciflc Railroad right of way and Marietta Avenue are approprlate for residential uses e The Planning Commisston notes that the North Pines Study delineates zonirrj. along Pines Road as follows: a e Between the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way and Marletta be fndicated as a low density residential area centered around the Trent Grade Schoot: (Single,and Two Family Reslden- tia 1) . bo Between Marietta and Mansffeld Avenues (both sides of Pines Road) be indicated as high density residential area: ( Multiple Famtly Residential). c. Between Mansfield and Sh3nnon Avenues (both sides of Pines Road) be indicatzd as a freeway commercial or resldential office area. - 50 - t ZE-46-76 TV',iG FAMILY RESIDEN1'IAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS AIVD RESIDENTIAL OFFICE: V1r OLFLARTD, INC. (Continued) NOTE: The Board of County Commiss i oners concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendatton to accept and approye the Planninq Staff's study of North Pines Road between Trent Road and the Spokane Valley Freeway. The Board further concurred that the Comprehensive P1an for the Valley be chanqed to reflect future land use as outiined by the Planninq Commissi on's Study and Zoning Plano 2, The zoninq plan for Plnes Road between the Northern Pacific Railroad right of way and Marietta calls for residential uses of those properties e The Text Portton of the Corriprehensive Plan for Spokane County defines residential as a land use element desiqned to serve existing and future dwellinq untts. Areas designed for residential purposes are to remat n free from commercial and industrial uses. 3, The Planning Commission has not encouraged the proliferation of Local Buslness Zoning along North Pines and the staff c oncludes that the small business site would be an unwarranted intrusion lnto the residential nQighborhood. NOTE: The advertised property is surrounded on three sldes by residentlal development, 4e It was noted that the Plannlnq Commissi on has been recently approv- Ing Resldential Office roquests on North Pines Road between I-90, south to Sprague Avenuee Rlso, the "7.oning Plan for Pines Road Between the Freeway an3 Trent Avenue" recommends Residential Office uses for property along Ptnes, south of Mansfleld to Shannon .Avenue, but not north of Mansfield along Pines Road. (See vicinity map of the agenda). B. STA FF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEVtT: As required in WAC 197- la- 320, the staff of the County P1 anning Commis- sion reviewed the envrionmental checklist submftted by Mro F. V. Seipp tn behalf of Wolfland, Inco for a zone change to allow constructlon of a convenience Grocory and offlce complex. The proposal is located approximately fn the E 1/2 of the 1VE 1/4 of Section 9, Township 25AT., Range 44 EWM fronting Pines Road, south of Buckeye Avenue. The pro- ponent is requesting a zone change from Two Famtly Residenttal to Residential Office and Local Business to allow the consruction of a convenience qrocery store, and an offlce butlding on a site of just over one (1) acra tn size o The site i s located on r elatively flat terrain with an unmanaqed grass land vegetatfon cover. The •staff evaluation identlfied only cne potenttally major impact area, that of increased motoc vehicle traffic ant Fhe sacondary impacts therewitho This would lnciude such Impacts as nt=reased air pollution(carbon monixlde 51 - ZE-46-76 TtVO FANIILY RESIDENTIAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS A1VD RE3IDENTIAL OFFICE: VvOLFLAND, INCe (Contfnued) and suspended particulates), increased noise levels, and the increased public safety hazard of defiEcle acctdents. However, due to the relatively srnall size of the proposal, these impacts are considered insigniffcant. The concluslon of the review of this environmental checklist is that no siqnificant environmental lmpacts will likely result from the proposal. Therefore, it is recommended that a Declaration of Non-Significance be - issued and an environmental impact statement mot be requiredo C. GENERAL DATA: 1. Location: Sectton 9, Township 25T\T e, Range 44, EWM Lots 1, 2, and 3, block 1 of Stoneridge Subdivisi on. 2, Applicant: W olfland, Inc South 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 3. Site Size: 43, 817 square feet 4, Exlsting Zoninq: Two - Family Resfdential, established Feb. 7, 1974 S e Proposed Zoninq: Local Businoss and Residentfal Office 6. Proposed use of property: Offlce and Convenience grocery store e 7. Appllcation of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4 0 21, Section 4.21,040 ~ - 52 - , ti -O~~TY r~ ~ OF ~ ~,K~ ~GTa _ Y 1~Fi ~ y, '~X~ SpQAtAf., Cov~ o~- ~ _ • Fro 4• ~ Sublect ~ ~ G~-~ 1 • ~ ~ s ~ , ' e& ol X I /:t l~✓, y~it~.~j ~v c~[J.~,i ~ ~',/L~ r ~ ~ ~ loo., 5POKANt VALLt(l FIRt DtPARTIACNT ~ EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. o SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 . ~ June 3, 1976 , Mr. Dwight Hume, Acting Director Spokane County Planning Comanission Spokane, Washington Dear Mr. Hume: The foliowing zone changes and preliminary subdivisions have been reviewed for - adequate fi re protection: J , h PE-1011-76 zE- 59-76 - Mains and hydrants need to be installed in this areae e PE-1013-76 ZE- 61-76 - There are existing mains in this area but hydrants will be needed. PE-1014-76 °ZE- 62-76 - There are existing mains,in this area but hydrants wi11 be needed. PE-1015-76 ZE- 63-76 - There are'existing mains in this area but'hydrants wi11 be needed. PE-1017-76 -IJA, ZE- 65-76 - There are existing mains in this area but hydrants wi11 be needed. PE-895A-73 ZE- 35A-73 - jMains and hydrants need to be installed in th3~s area. ZE- 43-76 -'There are existing mains in this area but hydrants will be needed. ZE- 44-76 = Mains and hydrants need ta be installed in this area~A, LL ZE- 46-76 - Th. ~ s area . ~ s~Sgy~,~C~d by adequate ma. ~ ns and hydrants I I ~sa w y ~ : ZE- 53-76 -There are exi sti ng mai ns i n thi s area but _hydrants wi 11 be needed. . , , - S i n e , +~w ~ R~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ / , /~C..../ . A1 Cook Lt. of Inspectors ~r~~~A N ~ ~~U','-= Fire Prevention Bureau PI I111f%1 r; 4"1^ C~1(iN ~ . ~ Ac: cy PREvENT FrREs sAvE LIVEs ~ , S PO KAN E COUN TY H EAL TN DISTRI CT Inter-Offi ce Communi cation Date: June 3, 1976 TO : Spokane County P1 anni nq Comi ss i on - , FROM: Eugene C. Prather, R.S. SUBJECT: Review Of Plot Plans For Zone Changes ~ ~ Information provided to your office in support of requests for zone changes i s not adequate for us to make defi ni ti ve j udgements. However, pursuant to ~ your request, I have reviewed the material and offer comments on the zone change requests listed below. . 1. ZE 44-76 Agricultural to Restricted Industrial (Lynch): Anticipate no problems subject to specific design, placement and sizing of sewage disposa] facilities. 2. ZE 43-76 Freeway Comrnerci al to Restri cted Industri al ( Barbo-Dani el s and Company): Same as paragraph i above. 3. ZE 53-76 Restricted Industrial to Residential Office (Terhaar- Christensen Investments): , a. Same comment as paragraph 1 above. b. The proximity of the apartments to the railroad will lead to objectionable noise problems; anticipate degeneration of the rental uni ts i nto very 1 ow i ncome range wi th res ul tant hi gh turn-over rate of occupants and potenti al probl ems i n sol i d waste handl i ng. 4. ZN 55-76 Agriculturai to Commercial (Kel]og, Kellog and Hastings): Same comment as in paragraph 1 above. 5. ZE 46-76 Two-Family Residential to Local Business and Residential Office (Wolfland, Inc.):, Same comment as in paragraph 1 above. 6. ZN 54-76 Agriculturai Suburban to Commercial (Daklen): Same comment as in paragraph T above. 7. ZN 37-76 Agricultural to Restricted Industrial (Knopp): Same ccxnment as in paragraph 1 above. dr SCHO-ADM-118 ~ AGIIVDA, JUNE 11, 1976 TELEPHONE N0. :456-2274 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION NOTE CHANGE OF HOUR Time: Friday, June 11, 1976, 1:30 P.M. Place: Conference Room A, County Court House Annex ZONE CHANGE 4• ZE-46-76, Two-Family Residential to Local Business and Residential Office a. Location: Section 9, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M. Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 of Stoneridge Subdivision. b. Applicant: Wolfland, Inc. South 717 Pines Road Spokane, Washington 99206 c. Site Size: 43,317 Square feet d. Existing Zoning: Two-Family Residential, established February 7, 1974 e. Proposed Zoning: Local Business and Residential Office f. Proposed use of property: Office and convenience grocery store g. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 EUCLI D 1 AVE T~ - ~ . ~ RICK p ` I vIe . m ~ w~wwww.~r 3 1 = v ~ j~ ~ ;b ab r Q u~ MARIE i TA A ~ AEM N & , H w • ~C ~ .ara o Nt:ARLISLE Q ~ 9 a~mwtiJ n Q' > ~ N< W ~i M b 9} M A ,R~Y,~S ►~q Nr~ . , , EL 1965. SHANNOrv AVE • ~ " n - -«~~~~~-`•_•_r~ so •+w L. tew .a► ' MONTGOIMERY OR • "r S7f~~'! OR IMANY P~N~m > 17 ZE-46-76 ` In the matter of a hearing to consider changing the Zoning Map from Two Family Resldential to Local Business and Residential Office on property described as Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 of Stoneridge Subdivislon, in Section 9, Township 25 N., Ran.ge 44, E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. (West side of Pines Road, north of Marietta) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING sTaTE aF wasxrnGTON ) ) sso COUNTY OF SPOKATVE ) ~ Being first duly sdrorn, deposee and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years o That on V%/U1~ , 19~ he personally posted three (3) true and correct co ies of the hereto attached NOTICE OF P'UBLIC HFARIlVG at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: N C Cru,~"ma_v'~ . 2. ~ P Ij , LJ m R ~ Subscribed and sworn to me , 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGi'ON Residing at Spokane, Washington . ~ SPOKANE COUN1'Y PLANNING COMMISSION Court House, Spokane 1, Washington APPLICATION FOR LOCAL BUSINESS OR COMMERCIAL ZO1VE PART I; Information to be furnished the Planning Commission with an application for a Zone Change to Local Busine s s or Commercial. 1. Development Plan - a scale drawing of applicant's property and surrounding streets showing; a. Size, number, and type of proposed establishmeTtts; b. Off-street parking and loading areas proposed; c. Proposed access and egress points (curb cuts); and d. Landscaping, screening, or fencing proposed. 2. Economic analysis indicating the need for the proposed development which is to include: a. Type and sfze (square feet of sales space) of each establishment to be built wfthin the area proposed to be zoned; b. Number of spaces of off-street parking proposerl; c. Esttmate of annuai sales needed to support each establishment, d. Location of and distance from nearest competitive facilities, e. Estimated market area of establishments within area proposed to be zoned (indicate on a map showing the vicinity of proposed zone change); and f. If estimated market area includes competitive facilities, indicate percentage of sales expected to be received by proposed facilities. 3. Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. PART II; Date; Application No.: Ze Name of Applicant: Street Address; ~e~,(&:S City: 5QD041AF State: -JVA;%L Telephone Number: Existing Zone Classffication: ~ , fr` ~ Date Existing • Zone Classi~.cation Established, p ~j ~ ` a ~ ~-i ~ Proposed Zone Classification: LOcA.~Say~ ~L&Z oFFILPE s PACE ~ Proposed Use of Property: e~~ppe~C~ S,~peF No. of Acres j t~3j ooI7 64) oFT. Legal DeserJptioa tf 'Fopart7: ooor Section; ~ Township: ~S /Y , Ranqe: arccipn Street Addre s s of Prope rty: 'Who Holds Title to the Property: 41616/1~ zyvc ~ If you do not hold title to the property affected by this applfcation, what is your intere st in it ? ~ ~ A SKETCH OF THE AREA PROPOSED FOR A ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOIV MUST BE ATTACHED W7TH THIS APPLICATIOIiT. THE SKETCH MUST BE ON A SCALE OF 1" -400` . Maps may be secured from the County Engineer's Office, Court House. ALL OF THE FOLLOVIIIIVG C1UESTIOIVS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. VVhat are the changed conditions which are alleged to warrant other or additional zoning: W_'Op' Z ~ -I)OL~ . ~ ~ ' , P6- ~ , 2. What facts justify the proposed zone reclassification based on the advancement of the public health, safety, and general welfare? 11 e• i 3. Vvhat effect will the proposed zone reclassiftcatfon have on the value and character of adjacent property? s ~ ~ 4. Can a reasonable return from or reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? e ANY APPEAL FRO,M ACTION OF THE COUNTY PLAIVNING COMMISSION MUST BE PaRE,SENTED IN 'WRITING TO THE BOARD OF COtTNTY C,OMMISSIONERS ,UVITHIIV TE`N (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING HELD BY THE PLANIVING COMMISSION. (Signed) ~ April 19, 1976 . ZE- 4 6- 7 6 Spokane County Planniny Comncissio,i :..ounty Court house Spokane, vvashinyton 9;4201 uentlerr,e.1 vr c, tiie uiidersitjned proparty owilers , requa st tne Spokane County Planning Gommissioci (to coasider a zoning plail) or (to Lolisider chanying the Loniiig map) from TwQEaLM11v Residential to Local Busfness & Resfdential Office on the iollowiiit, described propertq Residentfal Otfice - Lot3, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdfvision, Sectfon 9, Townshfp 25N, Range 44, E. W. M. Local Busfness - Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivisfon, Section 9, Township 25N., Range 44, E.W. M. IvAiviz ~DPILSS LzGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ' SECTION 109 TOWNSHIP 259 RANGE 41- 10542-9011 1. Edna M. Dutton W.1723 Mansfield The South 26 2/3 rods of the North 60 rods of the Northwest quarter of the North 13 1/3 rods of the West 60 rods of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest 10547-9013 2., Roy L._Wyatt _ North 2310 Pines Rd. The North 150 feet of the South 36 2/3 roi r of the West 60 rods of the Southwest Quarter aF the Northwest Quarter. 10542-9045 3. Lloyd D. Banks The South 290 feet of the West 4~ feet ~of the South 30 rods of the North 43 1/3 rods of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. t 10542-9046 4. T. D. Hamilton South 717 Pines Rd. The South 30 rods of the North 43 1/3 roi ' of the West 60 rods of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter EXCEPT tha South 290 feet of the West 450 feet. MIRABEAU RANCH 09541-0952 5. Jack D. Teigen Lot 1 Block 9 ~ 09541-0953 6. Wi11 i am T. Odom ~'✓~d ~ Lot 2 B1 ock 9 ~ r DI April 19, 19 76 ZE- 4 6-'7 6 Spokane County Plannin5 Comritissio,,~ ,,aounty 0ourt' HouSe S'pokaiie, vvasiuayton cj;, 2 Q 1 uentle r~io.i vrc, tile undersiyaed proparty ow,lers, requast tne Sijokane Cour,ty Planning C.ommis5lo.l (to coasider a zoning platz) or (to konsfder chanying the 4oning map) from _SWQ yWly Residential to Local Business & Residential Offfce on the followiw, desc;ribed property Residential Office Lot3, Block 1, Stonerfdge Subdivision, Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44, E.W. M. Local, Businessi ~ Lot 1 and 2. Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivision, Sectlon 9, Township 25N„ Range 44, E.W.M. IvAWL 1; ADDItLSS LLGAL- DBSCRIPTIOAI OF PROPERTY ' MIRABEAU RANCH (CONTIDI 09541-0954 7. Jack D. Teigen Lot 3 Block 9 09541-0955 ' 8. Christine Woefgram ('Q4 Lot 4 81oc ~ !1~ k 9 r 09541-0957 9e Raymond M. Jones ~ Lot 6 Block 9 ' 09541-0958 10. Joan M. Davis Lot 7 Block 9 09541-0959 , lle 8ruce A. Compton XgrazielLUM t 8 Block 9 Sxe~ 09541-0960 12a James W. SQooner y ~ Lot 9 Block , 9 N 09541-0961 . 13. Shel lah L. Tennant , Lot 10 Block,9 r DA April 19, 1976 ZE-46-76 , Spokane 'County Plannicly Comn,isslo~i ~,ounty k':ourt Fiouae Spokane, vvasiu,zyton 9;02 U 1 uentlercLea vrc, tiie uiidersiq,ied groparty owiiers, requast tne Saokane Cour.ty Planning C,ommissio.l (to co;isider a coning plaa) or (to ~o►isicler chanying the Loni,ig map) frorrl ____TwQ _E4Mjjy Res identfal to Loca 1 Bu s fnes s& Re sidential Office, . described property on the iollowiiYL Residential Office - Lot3, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivision, Secfiion 9, Township 25N, Range 44, E.W. M. Local Busfness - Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivision, Section 9, Townshlp 25N., Range 44, E.W. M. IvAlv►L AD.uFILSS LLGAL DESCRIPTIOAT OF PROMPERTY ' o954i-io71 14e aewrd P. La Vigne , N. 4408 Madtson St, Lot 10 Block 10 . '07 SL x 0 09541-1560 , ~ 15e Charlotte M. Carrol_1- V ot 1 Block 15 !4 ; 09541-1561 16e William D. Stookey I Q Lot 2 , Block 15 ~ : 09541-1562 . 17, 8onnie Jo Songhurst , Lot 3 Block 15 09541-1563 , 1 18e James A. Frye Lot 4 B l ock 15 j~ 09541-1564 , 19o Ronald V. Boures n Lot 5 Block 15 • 09541-1446 . 20o Marvin E. Macy Lot i Block 14 / 09541-1447 21. Gary L. Conner ~ Lot 2 Block 14 ! L 1 w ♦ April 19, 1976 , ZE-46- 76 Spokane County Plannitiy Comn►issio.: %.ounty Court house Spokaze, vvasni,iyton 911;, 201 ~c:ntle rr,~:,~ vrc, tiie u.idersiq,led proparty ow«ers, request tne Spokane County Planning Gommissioii (to co,z~ider a coninig plaii) or (to %;onsider chanying the 2.oning map) froRi I __TWQXiMWlv Residential to Local Business & Residential Office on tho followiILL, described property Residential Office - Lot3, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivision, Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44, E,W. M. Local Business - Lot 1 and 2, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivfsion, Section 9, Township 25N„ Range 44, E.W.M. Iv Alv~z ADI)MSS LLGAL DESCRIPTIOAI OF PROPE RTY SYTONE RIDGE SUBDIVISION r ~~j ~ 09541-2503 Spolca E1 k ~ 22o Lodge #23 r # Lot 3 Block 3 . , 7Ppp'0.'-'4Ajee a 1 k 09541-2502 23e Lodqe #2328 L Lot 2 81ock 3 , 09,541-2501 24e po a e e Lodqe #2,328 Lot l Black 3 t~ x < < 09541-2401 ,25, po ne a Elk F LodQe 2 28 , Lot 1 Biock 2 r . ~j ~ ~ 09541-2402 26e Sp a e all W•I.edigefiZI28 L ,Lot 2 B 1 ock 2 . L - 2 1 1k 09541-2403 ~ Lot 3 Block 2 , 28. 4elks 09541-2404 'b'4WS4 . Lodge #232 Lot 4 Block 2 ~ - ~ 29o S o~ a s , 09541-2405 ,-\-X , Lodge #2328 Lot 5 Block 2 , J . Aprfl 19, 1976 ZE-46-76 Spokane County Planniny Comnjlssio~i ..,ounty Court House Spokane, vr asni,lyton -01Z#2 O 1 ~entlerc,t:.Y vrc, tiie undersiyiled proparty owiiers, requast tne Spokane County Planning Gommissioi► (to co,lsider a coniny plaii) or (to ~ollsider chanying the Lonit-ig map) frorri TwQ E.i5m11v Residential to Local Business & Residential Office on the followim, desc;ribed property• Residential Office - Lot3, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivision, Section 9, Township 25N, Range 44, E.W.M. Local 8usiness - Lor 1 and 2, Block 1, Stoneridge Subdivision, Section 9, Township 25N., Range 44, E.W. M. IvAiViL ADL)MS5 Lr'AGAL DESCRIPTION QF PROPERTY ' 09541-2406 30. S okang 4a~ Lodge #2328 Lot 6 Block 2 ~ ~ 09541-2301 ~ Wrol f 1 and In , Lot 1 81 ock 1 • 09541-2302 r ~ ~ 09541-2303 So a~ a E 1 k s \t33. Lodge #2328 Lot 3 Block 1 PINECROFT . 1 ks o95~+1-a 639 . The North 250 feet of Tracts 13 and 14~ , All of Tract 15 and the North 53 feet o Tract 20 EXCEPT County Road. 09541-1610 ~ ~ . Stonerid par "P56 tment~ Tracts 16 to 19 r ,--T ~ . Go'UvTy Co-tlRT ~o~ ~p ~G a G ~ SPr, A L~ ` ~ ' / j'p0OD pRppER'~`~ O ~ pg~ OF ~ ~~r~•. , « , - n ~ ~ -t` ~ i ~ ~ ► 4 ~ ~ iI `r ~ 1 T t T ~ 1 a r ~ + ~ r ! i , 4~ ` } ~ ~r I 1 P ~ j IA~~ ~ It T . _ d y r "►'r" ~ 1 ~ .1 ~ _ sr,,•~•• t ~ t ✓ ~ ~ ~ ~ U. go.'a O t ~ 1 ~ c , ~ r •"'w v ~ ' r~ ~ ~ ~ -•r ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 + ~ ~ O ~ f ' c p ♦ . ~ e V 000 Y ~ Ti tl ~ ~ + • ~ ~ 00-00 n . ~ , 0++ 1 , r M1 ~ ~ T ~ - rt ~ ~ r { ~~rr 0010P ~ ~ ow t Ti ~ p woom T ! , L ~ ~ , ~ ~ c~~o30 ~ . < a Lw~~ 1 ~ a ♦ r• ' - - _ ~ . ~ . C L 1 16► IIA) 0 Q.~ ~ . _ • ~ „ , ~ ► ~ ' L5 lif/ y i //1 1 ~ l v ~ c - ; , ¢y I t ~ i 1 ~/~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ • # 7 ~.r/ ~ } ~ S ' • ` i ~ ~ ' / , 'j ~ ~7~• • t ~ ` • f► ~ (Y} ~ 1 ! ~ ~ t i ~ ~'~PJ~'~{]/ _ ~ ~ ~ jJ Z • ~ • , ~ ~ ~ ~t ~ ~ • ~ , ~ - ~ ~ ~ t ~1 t , r ~ ~ , f i I 1 1 _ h ~ ~ ~ r oV 1 , J s r ' ~ ~ I F i 1 * r d ~ t( J y~ , ~ t t o 1G/ . l~ lI` - 1 ! ~f ~v' " "I.ir! 1 ~ ( ~ I P ooo~;; , 4 ~ , ~ .i t r 4 - . , Cf ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ } r - r l T ~ O ` ~ , /0 I i ` ~ .o. _ ~ ~ s • , a I 4 n ~■r_ ' ~D ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ You are hereby notifi~d, that an ~ , at the hour af ~f said day in Conference Roc~m A, llAallan Avenue En- trance, Spokane ~ounty Court House Annex, Sp~kane, Washir~gton, The SPQKANE C~UNTY RLANNlNG C~MMI~- SI~~I will c+~nduct a public hearing ta ~ ~~a~ ~ w~, r~ ~rt~, ~t ~ ~ ~ ~ YxT~ ~fi +G~T+~ ~ YI~A A C~JI~U~"~C~ ~ ~7~6 General descriptivn o~ ar~a: L~t~ ~ ~ I~d ~4 ~i 1 ~1~ $~~idp +~Ibd~'1►~~ ~ i~#~11 ~A ~ ~rr ~ ~.il.Mr, Co~I~l~~ 'Mlt~►~~. ~M~ +r~ ~ 1~, ~Ir~ ~t 1~i~l~~i ~r~~13 FC~R FURTHER DETAIL~ contact the Spokane Count y Planr~ing Commi~sion, Public Works Buildin ~I. 811 Jef#er- 9~ son Street, Spoka~ne, Washington, ~ Di~ector of Ffanning Spolcane Caun#y Planning Cammis~ion FORM 848 PI~NG. CQMM. 3•A'J ~ 1 1 ; RTY C! F' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U N TY ~N~ ~SS{~R ~ 6~2. DOAc f~~ z~ ~ ~~y . . . ~ ~ . JO~. ~ J S !r~ ~ "e C~ ~ 4 ~ ~ '4~ ~ 1 ~1~`~ 7 avR ~ ~ 1 ~ •4;~ ~ '1 ; ~ ~ ~ ,I~ s vr' - ~ , _ . _.,i ~ . . N ~ , ~ ~{I 'z n. ~ ~ ^i n ~~1 ` I 1l 4 ~ i-~p 4 6J R, ,,.a r -u~~ ar ~a~ a~s -~s ~s- ~r r~►-~~q t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ a . ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1l...~_~~ w~ ~i~! ~1_~ illl~,~ . ~.,,`a.w.4: 'i~rf,S;J' :~.i~r.f~ , I V~ `J 1 Y !7 G ~ ~ s ~ r Tn.I , hh I p ` ~ 9 p s. fi bi~~~tiP bb?7~ l/+r° ; ~ T~; J~'~ .Sa , 'f ~ ' * • ~ " { ~ ~ ~M f f ~ _ ,2 ✓ , ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ii . r C ~ l / . 1 ~3 a 3 ~ N9 ,s,S , T i ~M ~ ~ - - ~ r•~. ~-..~.ay~._fd.S.,~..~~.~d~ ~ ..~5 ~ , T Jl+~ J 1 .ti ~tx'~ 4 s~ 13 2 I ! ~ ' , ~r ~ _..1~'~Z ~ • ~ ~ , r +p ~ - r" s ~ ~ i ~ a~ 3 ~ ~ l~ I i~ 1~ i~' l ~7 4 ~ 4 e i,3 /i~ /.s' rb ~7 ~ L { 1 . a~ ~ ' r_• ~ Ri.-,,~ ~ 'x ~ 1 E~ ~ ai - ~ Y~ ~ 0~ ~ f' . ~ f a y l0 3~ de j" ~ fi s• 1 'f", .2 ~ ~ w , J~ ~r , . ~ s° r ~ ! _ _ ~ ~ , ~r . , „ ~ s~ _ I _ ~ ~ 2 3 , ~ ~'r,f~i9~~ YE ~ ~ . . A ~ ~ ~ ~ , ra, p• . qa ~ 4 ~ r.. .i . ~ , ~ 4~ i ~~a ; ~r' r Q+ 7 . ( ~f,y~. . ~ f`' r~` • ~ ~ . ~~~r . .l ~ ~i ~ f~ 1. a , t~ ( ~ ,3 0 ~ ~ e2 ~ 5 ~ l 9 7 1 6 1~ 4~ 1 ~ ~ ~ „ ~32~ !~9 ~t h ~ - r ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ ~ f f , ii~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ l4 /,5 /b /1 ~ f . ~ / lz ,l~' ~I t,~ / /4 /5 /6 f8 B /4 l Q ~ 3 ti . r s4 76 ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r~ / ~ ~ 't~~' ~ o.i e fi •'~Q! ~ {Q r'~;r { ~ ~ ti ~ ~ i 4 ~R~ . s. ~,ti .3d . , r ~ a ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~UC/~EY~ , ,qy~' ~ 4~ ~ ° ! ~q , ra ~ f r.~. ae ' 7~r. zo n f ya • . ~ . ' ~ ~ ri ' . ~ r ~ ~ • p ~ ~2 O y~ ~ . ~ , ~ o . r ~a ~ / . / l ~ f 4 ~ , / 3. ~ I ~ 7 ~ 1 1 ~a G ~ ~ ~j t ~ ° ~ ~ J . ~ ~ ~ ~3~.~ ~ra.~ „ u N ~ ~ Y e ,26 3~~' 8, I 5_ j~a', f`~ , r ~1►".~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ ~t 4 ~ t:~~ ~ T ,60' l'~B : ~ _ , ; ) . ~ 4_ 4 ~ ! ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ . ~r ~ , ~ . ~ ^ ,g r i`4 ~ , a . e ~ . ~ • " 4- ~ ~ .,.9 _ ~ 'P ~ . ~ C , ' t ~ ~ ti t ~ ~ , , , ~ ~ d ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ U ~ 4 ~ ' ~ r'q , , ' ~ e x ~1 ~ ~2 - - ' { . ~ . , 5 ar ~ < ~ " ~,r ~ ' F Z ~ ~"Pl w ` ~ ~ ~ / ~ . ~ ~ ~ a ~ - ! ~ ~ , ts. , , f~ ~ J,~ , ~ ~ w 3 . o Y; ~ ~ ± ~ , _ 6 ~ ~ „ - cl _ ~.s ~ , ~ '~6 f , . ~ . z : . , I ~ r . . G ~ 1 a ~ ~ s ! dw I e ir~ l-_-,.!.'~~ ~ ` ~''1 ' ~ , ~1 ' i i►. « ~ ~ ' I M lE T TA ~ ~14~E, _ ~ ' „ • \ ~F _ ~ - ~ . ~ , .~.r , . . ~ @ : ~ . . r - f~._,.,~~ - , r~ , , ~ 1~ . ~ - ~ . , ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ ~ ~ ~ S' ; , ~ . so . ~ ~ ' - ~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ - ~ , , ~ i' J ~ . ~ - f, ' , . ~ ~ / . ~ ~ , , - ~ ~ . . .~r ~ ~ ; c ~ , r ~ A j ~ 6 ~ r ' r ' ~ ~ d ~ $ I , n I „ ~ ti . . ~ Y` ~ . l3 ~ - ~ l . ~ :v - - _ _ - - - - I ~ _ f~ ~ _ - f ~ _ ~ _ 4 TM _ . k , - ~ y ~ ~ ~ _ ' _ . . ~ 6 a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C~ f~d ~ . . ~ . L~L~ t 0 . . ~ , . \ , ~ ' ' ~ , ~ _.-r-"~' ~ . , - ~ ,3 .~'o ~ ° L. _ _ _ _ _ _ , ~ C,~ f~' ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ Ia' T4' 7 ~a' y a ` 'YJ.~ I 3~, ~ i t ~ , / d . . / ~ , ~ , ~ - ~ ~ f! • \ ~v~,~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ f 2 ~ ~ ~ I , S ~ 3 % ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~a ~ ~ ~ ~ a a ~ - , ~ . ~ o L ~ ~ ~ 9 ! . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ a ~ e ~ 4 - ~ , ~ , . ~ , , , ~ J` ~ ~ '"p' ~ h 3 f ` Q ~ . ~ ri' . ~ ~ s* ~ ~ T p ~ ~ 1 , a ~ i'~' ~ 2 a- ''J 8 ! f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ rq ~ , , gf- ~ ~ a ~ ~ ~ / . d ~r3. c' b a ~ q n , ~ 21 ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ - ~ c~ ~ ~ a~ f Q. J+t~ l7 ~ /O A 1~ ti ~ u'~ R +r~' 1. ra' t~' C~ ' ~ ~ . ~ ~,f ~ ~ ~r•o 1 ay ~RR J 1! ~ o`~~. 2~. c~~~ 9 ~ - ry /~3~ ~j '`~a. ~ r ;1 ~ .o 2 22,9 w~ v~a ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ a.w~. ~ ' . , ~ ~ 'o , ~ f 9 ' ' ~ , ~ -~r 9v ~ . o : ~ u~,~ v" - 0, ~ E ~ 1 • 8 - ~ ~ R~ _ ~ t4 ~ ~ q . ~ ~9 ~ ~~s' ,r . ~ , ~ ti : a , . ` f. ~ tio o q AR B ~7 ~n~.' ~Q• 4~,~, i ze~ . . ~ 9 i 4~ 1 ~ Q - 4 , * ~ 7 10 r, f a o~ ~ ,2 9 ~ 1 . ~ C~ ~ ti ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ b . , ~ ( 7 ~ ~ ~ ' k ~ . ~a : , 't , ~ ~ ~ eh ~ ~y .t~ v 0 ? , y~~ ~ .~4 8 \ ~ r~ e► ~ , , a c~ ~ , ~ ~tl• , 4 ca , t~ _ : a - - ~ \ ~ ~ r~~ ' ~ 9 ~ o~ ~ . ~ ~ 6 " ' " 7 ` ~ ~ ~ '~c ~ ` .1 . 6 ~ , 4 ,3 ~ ~ P . 6~, • ~ y~. , r ~ e. , / 9 ~ ~ ( ~ ~ - ~ , . - - a ,~1 ~ . . R , , . , , „j ~ k e . ~ / ~ , , ~ . ~ r p * ~s M ~ ~ 2~- 1 ~ ~ ~ . , S e 4 ; ~ 3 - . 0~ . ~ - ~ ~ . ~ 4 ~ M 4-- U fi~ d 9' ~ y~~' r ~ ~7t y~ ~ s ' Ai~of ~ , ,e' ~ 2.~ Fe ,~+~Q ~j e az '4iI, T :f O J' - , s ~a'~ Rr~~w4 AV~' y. - - .s. _ ~ \ ~ ~ a q ~ ~ ~ .,u~ % ~ 17 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i - - - ~ l~l . _ _ _ _ ~ ~ L _ - ~ ,