Loading...
2015, 12-29 Study SessionAGENDA CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY CITY COUNCIL WORKSHEET STUDY SESSION Tuesday, December 29, 2015 6:00 p.m. CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 11707 East Sprague Avenue, First Floor (Please Silence Your Cell Phones During the Meeting) DISCUSSION LEADER SUBJECT/ACTIVITY GOAL CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: ACTION ITEMS: 1. Morgan Koudelka 2. Morgan Koudelka 3. Morgan Koudelka 4. Chelsie Taylor False Alarm Agreement Extension [public comment] Spokane County Information Systems Department Interlocal Agreement [public comment] Commute Trip Reduction Interlocal Agreement [public comment] Proposed Fee Resolution 15-012 [public comment] Motion Consideration Motion Consideration Motion Consideration Motion Consideration NON -ACTION ITEMS: 5. Nancy Ledeboer, Library District 6. John Hohman, Gloria Mantz 7. John Hohman 8. Mayor Grafos Library District Update Historic Preservation Program City Hall Update Advance Agenda 9. Information Only (will not be reported or discussed): Department Monthly Reports 10. Mayor Grafos 11. Mike Jackson ADJOURN Council Comments City Manager Comments Study Session Agenda, December 29, 2015 Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information Discussion/Information CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 29, 2015 Department Director Approval: Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ❑ admin. report ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: False Alarm Program Contract Extension GOVERNING LEGISLATION: N/A PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Council Approved False Alarm Program Contract C09-163 on October 13, 2009. BACKGROUND: City started current false alarm program in 2010 in order to reduce the number of false alarms, improve police response times, increase officer safety, and create more time for proactive policing. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.20.010.A states, "The City regulates security alarm businesses to assure that responses to false alarms do not diminish the availability of police services to the general public and to assure that citizens who cannot afford or do not choose to operate security alarm systems are not penalized for their condition or choice. Spokane Valley Municipal Code 7.20.160.A. states, "Causing police to engage in a false alarm response constitutes an appropriation of public police services for private purposes and is subject to a cost recovery fee." Staff conducted an evaluation of the program, costs and revenues, and dispatch records. Staff makes the following recommendations: ■ Extend the contract with Public Safety Corporation one year. ■ Reduce the false alarm rates to $75/residential and $125/commercial (Previously $85/$165). ■ Make the registration renewal rate the same regardless of previous false alarms, $15/residential and $25/commercial (Previously, if the customer had a false alarm in the past year the registration rate was $25/residential and $35/commercial). ■ Eliminate the appeal fee (Previously $25). ■ Suspend registered accounts for non-payment at 60 days past due (Previously 120 days). OPTIONS: Approve motion as presented or with modifications. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize City Manager to Finalize and Execute Contract Amendment to the Agreement Between the City of Spokane Valley and Public Safety Corporation/Crywolf. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Recommended changes would reduce revenue by approximately $35,270 but would still cover costs of administering the program and responding to false alarms. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst John Pietro, Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: Contract Amendment CONTRACT AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AND PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION/CRYWOLF Contract #09-163.004 For good and valuable consideration, the legal sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, City and the Consultant mutually agree as follows: 1. Purpose: This Amendment is for the Contract with Public Safety Corporation/CryWolf for the security alarm monitoring program, by and between the Parties, executed by the Parties on October 13, 2009, and which terminates on December 31, 2015. Said contract shall be referred to as the "Original Contract" and its terms are hereby incorporated by reference. Compensation under the Original Contract is set forth in Exhibit 2 to the Original Contract. 2. Original Contract Provisions: The Parties agree to continue to abide by those terms and conditions of the Original Contract and any amendments thereto which are not specifically modified by this Amendment. 3. Amendment Provisions: This Amendment is subject to the following amended provisions, which are either as follows. All such amended provisions are hereby incorporated by reference herein and shall control over any conflicting provisions of the Original Contract, including any previous amendments thereto. Paragraph 2, "Term of Contract", is modified as follows: This agreement shall be in full force and effect on or about January 1, 2010, and end on December 31, 2012. The contract may be extended for up to teefour additional one-year contract periods, subject to mutual agreement, with the total contract period not to exceed si*seven years. The City shall notify the Consultant of its intent to exercise an extension option in writing, no later than 60 days prior to the termination date of the initial contract term, or any extension year. Either party may terminate this agreement by thirty days written notice to the other party. In the event of such termination, the City shall pay the Consultant for all work previously authorized and satisfactorily performed prior to the termination date. Exhibit 2, "Response to Request for Proposals to Administer Security Alarm Program", Section 4.A "Proposed Costing Method", is modified as follows: The RFP mandates that proposing firms derive their fees exclusively from the false alarm revenue received and requests at least one bid on a "Revenue Sharing" basis. Pricing Method Based on our analysis of the potential Spokane Valley Security Alarm Program revenue using a new fee structure similar to the City of Spokane, and projected Program costs, we propose a single, 100% revenue sharing approach. In order to provide a simple method to administer, PSC proposes to be compensated for its services by receiving 30.5%twenty five (25%) 1 percent of the registration and false alarm -related fees, fines and penalties collected on behalf of the Spokane Valley Security Alarm Program. This percentage is based on several assumptions: • The Ordinance fee/fine schedules remain in substantially the same form as currently proposed in the Spokane Valley Resolution 15-012Ordinancc No. 03 070 previously provided to PSC; • The City applies a fair, but firm approach to appeals resulting in alarm fines being generally upheld on appeal; • The City actively supports enforcement of the Ordinance, including proactive collection of all fine amounts owed. 4. Compensation Amendment History: This is Amendment #_1_ of the Original Contract. Compensation is based on a percentage of fees collected, and is not impacted at this time by this Amendment. The Parties have executed this Amendment to the Original Contract this day of December 2015. CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY: PUBLIC SAFETY CORPORATION/CRYWOLF: Mike Jackson, City Manager By: Chuck Inderrieden Its: Finance Director ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Office of the City Attorney 2 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 29, 2015 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ • new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Spokane County Information Systems Department Interlocal Agreement GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 39.34 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Interlocal Agreement 03-019 Approved on 04/08/2003. BACKGROUND: This is a new agreement (replacing a previous agreement) that includes existing services for Geographic Information System, Webpadal (license granting access to County databases), and Stormbill (stormwater database used to assess and bill stormwater fees). The City has previously been paying for GIS and Webpadal services. The City has not been charged previously for Stormbill. The cost for Stormbill is $1,200 per year. The Stormbill database is used to generate approximately $1.9 million in stormwater fees. OPTIONS: Proceed to motion consideration, gather more information, or decide not to proceed. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize the City Manager to Finalize and Execute the Interlocal Agreement Between Spokane County and City of Spokane Valley Regarding Data Processing Applications and Services. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: Additional $1,200 in annual expense in Fund 402, Storm Management Fund. Existing costs are approximately $102,000 in GIS services and $27,000 in WEBPADAL licenses. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: Draft Interlocal Agreement INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPOKANE COUNTY AND CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY REGARDING DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 1116 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 11707 E Sprague Ave., Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA 99206, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," jointly hereinafter referred to as the "PARTIES." The COUNTY and CITY agree as follows. SECTION NO. 1: RECITALS AND FINDINGS (a) The Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington has the care of County property and the management of county funds and business under RCW 36.32.120(6). (b) Counties and cities may contract with each other to perform certain functions which each may legally perform under chapter 39.34 RCW (Interlocal Cooperation Act). (c) Spokane County has created an Information Systems Department ("ISD") which provides various data processing applications and services to Spokane County elected officials and departments. (d) The City of Spokane Valley desires to contract with Spokane County to obtain through ISD certain data processing applications and services. SECTION NO. 2: DEFINITIONS (a) Agreement: "Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement between the CITY and COUNTY regarding certain data processing applications and services. (b) City: "CITY" means the City of Spokane Valley. (c) Compensation: "Compensation means that methodology set forth in Exhibit 2 used to establish the amount of money which the CITY will pay the COUNTY for providing Services. (d) County: "COUNTY" means Spokane County. (e) GIS: "GIS" means Geographic Information System. (f) ISD: "ISD" means the COUNTY Information Systems Department. (g) Services: "Services" means those services identified in Exhibit 1. INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 1 of 12 (h) STORMBILL: "STORMBILL" means the application and database used to generate and manage the CITY's storm water parcel fees. (i) WEBPADAL: "WEBPADAL" means the Spokane County Assessor's parcel database application, with integrated GIS map display. (j) Uncontrollable Circumstances: "Uncontrollable Circumstances" means the following events: riots, wars, civil disturbances, insurrections, acts of terrorism, external fires and floods, volcanic eruptions, lightning or earthquakes at or near where the Services are performed and/or that directly affect providing of such Services. SECTION NO. 3: PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to reduce to writing the PARTIES' understandings as to the terms and conditions under which the COUNTY, through the ISD, will provide Services to the CITY. It is the intent of the PARTIES that Services to be provided by the COUNTY will be consistent with the CITY'S Council/Manager form of government provided for in chapter 35A.13 RCW. SECTION NO. 4: DURATION/WITHDRAWAL This Agreement shall commence on the last date that the Agreement is executed by the PARTIES and shall run through 12:00 P.M. on December 31, 2016 unless one of the PARTIES provides written notice of termination. At the conclusion of the initial term, this Agreement shall automatically be renewed from year-to- year thereafter effective 12:01 P.M. on January 1st to 1200 P.M. on December 31st up to a maximum of ten (10) years. All renewals shall be subject to all terms and conditions set forth herein except for Exhibit 2. Any Party may withdraw at any time from this Agreement for any reason whatsoever upon a minimum of 180 days written notice as provided for in Section 7 to the other Party. SECTION NO. 5: COST OF SERVICES AND PAYMENTS The CITY shall pay the COUNTY the actual costs for Services provided under this Agreement as set forth in Exhibit "2". Costs set forth in Exhibit "2" are at current rates and are subject to change. Actual costs will include the actual direct labor, supervision, employee benefits, equipment, materials and supplies, and overhead costs. The COUNTY will bill the CITY for the cost of Services monthly or annually as outlined in Exhibit "2". COUNTY will bill CITY for monthly billings by the 15th of the month for the previous month. Payments by the CITY will be due by the 5th day of the following month. COUNTY shall bill the CITY for annual billings by the 10th of January for the previous year. Payments by the CITY shall be due by the 5th day of February. INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 2 of 12 The COUNTY, at its sole option, may charge interest on any late payment calculated on any lost interest earning had the amount due been invested since the date due to the date of payment in the COUNTY's investment pool. SECTION NO. 6: RELATED RESPONSIBILITIES IN CONJUNCTION WITH PROVIDING SERVICES The COUNTY and CITY or their designee agree to attend staff meetings as requested by the CITY Manager. The COUNTY and CITY or their designees agree to meet upon request by the CITY Manager or his/her designee to discuss any Service provided under the terms of this Agreement. CITY agrees to facilitate COUNTY providing Services under this Agreement as follows: (a) Confer on COUNTY the authority to perform the GIS and mapping maintenance services within CITY; (b) Agree that when COUNTY provides Services, ISD may exercise all the powers and perform all the duties vested by law or by resolution in the CITY or other officer or department charged by CITY with data processing services; and (c) Agree that the CITY shall be responsible for providing workspace and furnishing phones, desk, chair and other items deemed necessary for GIS staff person to perform their work at their site. SECTION NO. 7: NOTICE All notices or other communications given hereunder shall be deemed given on: (1) the day such notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or (ii) the third day following the day on which the same have been mailed by first class delivery, postage prepaid addressed to the COUNTY or the CITY at the address set forth below for such Party, or at such other address as either Party shall from time -to -time designate by notice in writing to the other Party: COUNTY: CITY: Spokane County Chief Executive Officer or his/her authorized representative 1116 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 City of Spokane Valley City Manager or his/her authorized representative 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, Washington 99206 INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 3 of 12 ISD: Spokane County ISD Director 815 N. Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 SECTION NO. 8: RECORDS REVIEW The COUNTY shall maintain for six (6) years any billing statements and other similar business records with respect to this Agreement. The CITY shall be allowed to conduct random reviews of the records generated by the COUNTY in performance of this Agreement. The CITY shall provide the COUNTY with reasonable advance notice of the records reviews. The PARTIES agree that they shall make best efforts to achieve a resolution of any potential records confidentiality issues, including entering into confidentiality agreements or other similar mechanisms that will allow disclosure of the necessary information to accurately conduct a records review. SECTION NO. 9: COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same. SECTION NO. 10: ASSIGNMENT No Party may assign in whole or part its interest in this Agreement without the written approval of the other PARTY. SECTION NO. 11: COUNTY EMPLOYEES COUNTY shall hire, assign, retain and discipline all employees performing Services under this Agreement according to applicable collective bargaining agreements and applicable state and federal laws. COUNTY agrees to meet and confer with the CITY with respect to staff that is assigned to provide Services. Issues of discipline or performance will be specifically handled according to COUNTY policies. SECTION NO. 12: INSURANCE During the term of the Agreement, the COUNTY shall maintain in force at its own expense, each insurance noted below: A. Workers' Compensation Insurance in compliance with RCW 51.12.020, which requires subject employers to provide workers' compensation coverage for all their subject workers and Employer's Liability or Stop Gap Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000; B. General Liability Insurance on an occurrence basis, with a combined single limits of not less than $10,000,000 each occurrence for bodily injury and property damage. It shall INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 4 of 12 include contractual liability coverage for the indemnity provided under this Agreement. It shall provide that the CITY, its officers and employees are additional insureds but only with respect to the COUNTY's services to be provided under this Agreement; C. Automobile Liability Insurance with a combined single limit, or the equivalent of not less than $15,000,000 each accident for bodily injury and property damage, including coverage for owned, hired and non -owned vehicles; and D. Professional Liability Insurance with a combined single limit of not less than $5,000,000 each claim, incident or occurrence. This is to cover damages caused by the error, omission, or negligent acts related to the professional services to be provided under this Agreement. The coverage must remain in effect for two years after the Agreement is completed. There shall be no cancellation, material change, reduction of limits or intent not to renew the insurance coverage(s) without thirty (30) days written notice from the COUNTY or its insurer(s) to the CITY. SECTION NO. 13: LIABILITY The COUNTY shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY, its officers and employees from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the COUNTY's intentional or negligent acts or breach of its obligations under the Agreement. The COUNTY's duty to indemnify shall not apply to loss or liability caused solely by the intentional or negligent acts of the CITY, its officers and employees. The CITY shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the COUNTY, its officers and employees from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the CITY's intentional or negligent acts or breach of its obligations under the Agreement. The CITY's duty to indemnify shall not apply to loss or liability caused solely by the intentional or negligent acts of the COUNTY, its officers and employees. If the comparative negligence of the PARTIES and their officers and employees is a cause of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the PARTIES in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such proportion. Where an officer or employee of a party is acting under the direction and control of the other party, the party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other party's officer or employee's negligence. Each party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement. Each party waives, with respect to the other party only, its immunity under RCW Title 51, Industrial Insurance and only as necessary to make this indemnity provision enforceable with INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 5 of 12 respect to claims relating to the death or injury of CITY and/or COUNTY employees acting within the scope of this Agreement. The PARTIES have specifically negotiated this provision. COUNTY initials CITY initials SECTION NO. 14: RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES The PARTIES intend that an independent contractor relationship is created by this Agreement. The COUNTY shall be an independent contractor and not the agent or employee of the CITY. The CITY is interested only in the results to be achieved and that the right to control the particular manner, method and means in which the COUNTY meets its responsibilities is solely within the discretion of the COUNTY. Any and all employees who provide services to the CITY under this Agreement shall be deemed employees solely of the COUNTY. The COUNTY shall be solely responsible for the conduct and actions of all employees under this Agreement and any liability that may attach thereto. Likewise, no agent, employee, servant or representative of the CITY shall be deemed to be an employee, agent, servant or representative of the COUNTY for any purpose. SECTION NO. 15: MODIFICATION This Agreement may be modified in writing by mutual written agreement of the PARTIES. SECTION NO. 16: PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT The ownership of all property and equipment utilized in conjunction with providing the Services shall remain with the original owner, unless otherwise specifically and mutually agreed to by the PARTIES to this Agreement. For the purpose of this section, the terminology "owner" means that Party which paid the full purchase price for the property or equipment. SECTION NO. 17: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREINBINDING EFFECT This Agreement contains terms and conditions agreed upon by the PARTIES. The PARTIES agree that there are no other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement. No changes or additions to this Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the PARTIES unless such change or addition is in writing, executed by the PARTIES. COUNTY and CITY were each represented by their own attorney in drafting this Agreement and each relied upon the advice of their own attorney. This Agreement was fully negotiated and the terms herein were either accepted by or independently drafted or revised by the COUNTY and CITY. Accordingly, this Agreement shall not be construed against the party that undertook the principal preparation of it, but shall be construed as if both the COUNTY and CITY jointly prepared this Agreement, and any ambiguity contained herein, if any, shall not be interpreted against any one party. This Agreement shall be binding upon the PARTIES hereto, their successors and assigns. INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 6 of 12 SECTION NO. 18: DISPUTE RESOLUTION Except as provided for in Section Nos. 5 and 6, any dispute between the PARTIES which cannot be resolved between the PARTIES shall be subject to arbitration. Such dispute shall first be reduced to writing. If the COUNTY CEO and the CITY Manager cannot resolve the dispute, it shall be submitted to arbitration. The provisions of chapter 7.04A RCW shall be applicable to any arbitration proceeding. The COUNTY and the CITY shall have the right to designate one person each to act as an arbitrator. The two selected arbitrators shall then jointly select a third arbitrator. The decision of the arbitration panel shall be binding on the PARTIES and shall be subject to judicial review as provided for in chapter 7.04A RCW. The costs of the arbitration panel shall be equally split between the PARTIES. SECTION NO. 19: VENUE STIPULATION This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington and it is mutually understood and agreed by each party that this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any provision hereto, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. SECTION NO. 20: SEVERABILITY The PARTIES agree that if any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the PARTIES shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision. SECTION NO. 21: HEADINGS The section headings appearing in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they pertain. SECTION NO. 22: TIME OF ESSENCE OF AGREEMENT Time is of the essence of this Agreement and in case either Party fails to perform the obligations on its part to be performed at the time fixed for the performance of the respective obligation by the terms of this Agreement, the other Party may, at its election, hold the other Party liable for all costs and damages caused by such delay. INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 7 of 12 SECTION NO. 23: UNCONTROLLABLE CIRCUMSTANCES/IMPOSSIBILITY A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from Uncontrollable Circumstances shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. A delay or interruption in or failure of performance of all or any part of this Agreement resulting from any change in or new law, order, rule or regulation of any nature which renders providing of Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement legally impossible, and any other circumstances beyond the control of the COUNTY which render legally impossible the performance by the COUNTY of its obligations under this Agreement, shall be deemed not a default under this Agreement. SECTION NO. 24: FILING The CITY shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk or alternatively place the Agreement on the CITY's website. The COUNTY shall file this Agreement with the County Auditor, or, alternatively, place the Agreement on the COUNTY's website or other electronically retrievable public source. SECTION NO. 25: EXECUTION AND APPROVAL The PARTIES warrant that the officers executing below have been duly authorized to act for and on behalf of the Party for purposes of confirming this Agreement. SECTION NO. 26: INITIATIVES The PARTIES recognize that revenue reducing initiative(s) passed by the voters of Washington may substantially reduce local operating revenue for the CITY, COUNTY or both PARTIES. The PARTIES agree that it is necessary to have flexibility to reduce the contracted amount(s) in this Agreement in response to budget constraints resulting from the passage of revenue reducing initiative(s). If such an event occurs, the PARTIES agree to negotiate in good faith to achieve a mutually agreeable resolution in a timely fashion. SECTION NO. 27. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The PARTIES shall observe all federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations, to the extent that they may be applicable to the terms of this Agreement. SECTION NO. 28: DISCLAIMER Except as otherwise provided, this Agreement shall not be construed in any manner that would limit either Party's authority or powers under law. SECTION NO. 29: ASSURANCE The CITY shall pay the COUNTY the true and full cost of all Services provided under this Agreement. The intent of the Parties is that neither Party will subsidize the other and that the CITY will not subsidize any other jurisdiction that is receiving similar services. INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 8 of 12 SECTION NO. 30: ANTI -KICKBACK No officer or employee of the CITY, having the power or duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in the Agreement, or have solicited, accepted or granted a present or future gift, favor, service or other thing of value from or to any person involved in the Agreement. SECTION NO.31: NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES Nothing in this Agreement is intended to give, or shall give, whether directly or indirectly, any benefit or right, greater than that enjoyed by the general public, to third persons. SECTION NO. 32: SUPERCEDE CLAUSE Upon the Effective Date of this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall supersede any presently -existing agreements between the PARTIES regarding the Services set forth herein including but not limited those documents executed between the PARTIES entitled "INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPOKANE COUNTY AND CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY REGARDING DATA PROCESSING SERVICES (April 2003 -December 31, 2004) executed under COUNTY Resolution No. 03-0367 and CITY Contract No. 003-19 ( approved April 8, 2003), and INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN SPOKANE COUNTY AND CITY OF VALLEY REGARDING DATA PROCESSING SERVICES" executed under COUNTY Resolution No. 04-0473 and by the CITY on May 25, 2004. SECTION NO. 33: RCW 39.34 REQUIRED CLAUSES A. PURPOSE: See Section No. 3 above. B. DURATION: See Section No. 4 above. C. ORGANIZATION OF SEPARATE ENTITY AND ITS POWERS: No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement. D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES: See provisions above. E. AGREEMENT TO BE FILED: See Section No. 23. F. FINANCING: Each party shall be responsible for the financing of its contractual obligations under its normal budgetary process. G. TERMINATION: See Section No. 4 above. H. PROPERTY UPON TERMINATION: See Section No. 15 above. INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 9 of 12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the PARTIES have caused this Agreement to be executed on date and year opposite their respective signatures. DATED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ATTEST TODD MIELKE, Chair Clerk of the Board SHELLY O'QUINN, Vice -Chairman Ginna Vasquez AL FRENCH, Commissioner DATED: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Mike Jackson, City Manager Attest: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Approved as to form: City Attorney INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 10 of 12 EXHIBIT "1" COUNTY will provide the following Services to CITY: Service 1: Access to the Application known as WEBPADAL. Service 2: Access to the Application known as STORMBILL, Stormwater Application and Database. The COUNTY will host a separate database and application instance for the CITY's use, accessed via the COUNTY's CITRIX portal. Service 3: GIS Services, via a dedicated Spokane County ISD GIS Staff person. WEBPADAL provides complete access to the Spokane County Assessor's parcel database. All information is available, unlike the PubPadal application on the County's webpage, which is a scaled down version without name search capability and land use information. This program allows for advanced query and data extraction for analysis of property and taxation purposes. WEBPADAL also provides integrated GIS map displays. COUNTY will provide active user list upon request by CITY. CITY shall notify COUNTY for changes to named user list. For billing purposes, CITY will be billed full monthly rate for each named user with access to WEBPADAL for a majority of the month (>= 50% of month). STORMBILL is an application and database used to generate and manage the CITY's stormwater parcel fees. The COUNTY will host both the application and the database for the CITY, and the CITY will access the application and database via the COUNTY's CITRIX portal. GIS Services will be provided by COUNTY to CITY via a dedicated ISD GIS Specialist who will be located onsite at CITY offices, tasked with providing miscellaneous GIS data creation and maintenance services to CITY. CITY may request additional hours of service (billed at standard ISD hourly rates) during the term of the Agreement, subject to the COUNTY's ability to provide the additional services. CITY and COUNTY may extend or adjust GIS services and terms as mutually agreed according to the conditions of the Agreement. The CITY will abide by all applicable COUNTY union contract terms regarding working conditions and will provide breaks and lunches as outlined in the COUNTY Master Contract, Local 1553 Contract and ISD Addendum to said contract. COUNTY will provide copies of such contract and addendum to CITY. INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 11 of 12 EXHIBIT "2" Service Rate Billing Frequency 1. WEBPADAL $70.00 per month per named user Monthly Billing 2. STORMBILL Hosting and Access via CITRIX* $1200 per year Annual Billing 3. GIS Services ISD standard billable hourly rates. Billing rates are adjusted annually. Billed for actual hours worked per month for assigned staff person(s). Monthly Billing *CITY's use of STORMBILL application began prior to year 2015. CITY agrees to pay the annual charge beginning in 2015, regardless of the signing date of this agreement. INTERLOCAL RE DATA PROCESSING APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES Page 12 of 12 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 29, 2015 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ❑ • new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Motion Consideration: Intergovernmental Agreement for Commute Trip Reduction GOVERNING LEGISLATION: RCW 70.94 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: The Council authorized the City Manager to execute interlocal agreement 011-146 on September 13, 2011, and agreement C13-155 on August 27, 2013. BACKGROUND: The attached interlocal agreement is between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley. The agreement allows the Spokane County Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) department to retain the City's state -issued CTR funds in return for developing, implementing, and administering CTR plans and ordinances for all affected employers within the City of Spokane Valley. This agreement replaces the previous agreement, C13-155, which expired on June 30, 2015. The agreement is for two years and expires on June 30, 2017. There are no substantive changes from the previous agreement. The legal department has reviewed the agreement. OPTIONS: 1.) Authorize the agreement; 2.) request changes or more information; 3.) Have the City assume responsibility for overseeing the CTR programs for all affected employers in the City. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Authorize the City Manager to Finalize and Execute the Interlocal Agreement Between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley Regarding Commute Trip Reduction Implementation. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The County would retain the City's state funds of $65,406.24. If the agreement is not approved the City would have to dedicate these funds to the CTR program and administer the CTR programs of all 18 affected employers in Spokane Valley. STAFF CONTACT: Morgan Koudelka, Senior Administrative Analyst ATTACHMENTS: Interlocal Agreement INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT Between Spokane County and the City of Spokane Valley Regarding Commute Trip Reduction Implementation THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2015 by and between the City of Spokane Valley, a municipal corporation of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at 11707 East Sprague Avenue, Suite 106, Spokane Valley, WA, 99206, hereinafter referred to as the "City" and Spokane County, a political subdivision of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at West 1026 Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "County," jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties." WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Washington State Legislature has adopted legislation codified in RCW 70.94.521 through 555, the purpose of which is to improve air quality, improve transportation system efficiency and reduce the consumption of petroleum fuels through employer -based programs that encourage the use of alternatives to the single occupant vehicle for commute trips and reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT); and WHEREAS, RCW 70.94.527 requires counties containing urban growth areas and cities and towns with "major employers," that are located within urban growth areas with a state highway segment exceeding the threshold of one hundred person hours of delay or jurisdictions that are located in contiguous urban growth areas, or are within an urban growth area with a population greater than seventy thousand people that adopted an ordinance before the year 2000 or jurisdictions that are located in contiguous urban growth areas, or contain a major employment installation in an affected county to develop ordinances, plans and programs to reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and Single Occupant Vehicle (SOV) commute trips, and thereby reduce vehicle -related air pollution, traffic congestion and energy use, and WHEREAS, the County and each affected city within Spokane County have adopted Commute Trip Reduction Ordinances and must implement a Commute Trip Reduction (CTR) Plan for all major employers; and WHEREAS, the Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT) Public Transportation Division is responsible for administering funds on behalf of the state Legislature and is desirous of making available to Spokane County certain funds and requiring Spokane County to enter into agreements through the Interlocal Cooperation Act or by Resolution or Ordinance as appropriate with other jurisdictions, local transit agencies, or regional transportation planning organizations to coordinate the development, implementation and administration of CTR Plans and Ordinances as described in RCW 70.94.521-555. Page - 1 WHEREAS, Spokane County has entered into an agreement with WSDOT under Agreement No. GCB2167, hereinafter referred to as "WSDOT Agreement," pursuant to which Spokane County is eligible to receive a reimbursable amount of funds which the County will distribute to itself and cities to implement and administer CTR Plans and Ordinances; and WHEREAS, Spokane County has allocated $65,406.24 to the City from the Agreement No. GCB2167 which the City is now desirous of making available to the County to perform those tasks which are the responsibility of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth hereinafter, and as authorized under chapter RCW 70.94.527 (5), the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: Section 1: PURPOSE The County has entered into a WSDOT Agreement with the WSDOT under which it will receive $367,001 for two years. This funding is to be allocated to the County and cities within Spokane County for their use in the implementation and administration of their CTR Plans and Ordinances. The County, based upon an allocation formula established by the WSDOT, has determined that the City shall receive $65,406.24 from the WSDOT Agreement from which it shall perform certain tasks. The City agrees to its proportionate share of the monies made available to the County in the WSDOT Agreement and agrees to allow Spokane County to retain its proportionate share in consideration of the County performing those tasks as more particularly set forth in Attachment "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. In conjunction with allowing the County to retain its proportionate share of monies, the City will execute any and all necessary documents which may be required by the WSDOT. It is understood by the parties hereto, that in order for the County to perform those tasks as set forth in Attachment "A" for the City, the City must perform certain tasks. Attached hereto as Attachment "B" and incorporated herein by reference, is a listing of tasks which the City agrees to perform in conjunction with the County performing those tasks set forth in Attachment "A. II Section 2: DURATION The County agrees to provide those tasks set forth in Section 1 and complete performing such tasks on or before June 30, 2017. Section 3: TERMINATION The parties agree that this Agreement may be terminated by either party for material breach of any provision set forth herein, upon ninety (90) days advance written notice to the other party at the address set forth hereinabove. Provided, however, the parties agree that any notification of termination shall set forth the specific provision(s) for which such notification is being provided and additionally, advise that if such default is cured within such ninety (90) day time frame, said termination notification shall be of no force and effect. Page - 2 In the event of termination, the County agrees to provide to the City all written documentation which it has completed to the date of termination under the terms of this Agreement. Additionally, the County agrees to return to the City that portion of the monies set forth in Section 1 hereinabove, which has not been expended by the county, prior to the date of termination, on the City's behalf in providing those tasks as set forth in Attachment "A." Provided, further, the parties recognize that the WSDOT in Agreement No. GCB2167, has retained the right to unilaterally terminate all or a part of such contract if there is a reduction of funds from the funding source. Accordingly, in the event that the WSDOT terminates all or part of the WSDOT Agreement with Spokane County, and such action affects the allocation of funds by the County to the City herein, and/or modifies the tasks to be performed hereunder, the parties will immediately meet to renegotiate the provisions of this Agreement. Section 4: DESIGNATION OF ADMINISTRATOR The County hereby designated Ms. LeAnn M. Yamamoto, the Spokane County Transportation Demand Management Manager, as its designee for the purpose of administering and coordinating the County's responsibilities under the terms of this Agreement. Section 5: ACQUISITION/DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY The parties hereto agree that any real or personal property acquired by the County with those monies made available to the County by the City under Section 1 hereinabove shall be and remain the sole property of the County upon acquisition and/or termination of this Agreement. Section 6: COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The County agrees to observe all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances and regulations including, but no necessarily limited to, the Americans with Disabilities Act and chapter 49.60 RCW, to the extent that they may have any bearing on performing those tasks for the City as set forth in Section 1 hereinabove. Additionally, the County agrees to comply with all applicable funding audit requirements of WSDOT in conjunction with performing those t asks for the City. The County agrees to make available to the City or its duly authorized representative during normal County business hours and all records which it has kept in conjunction with providing those services for the City as set forth herein above. Section 7: NOTICES All notices or other communications given under this Agreement shall be considered given on the day such notices or other communications are received when sent by personal delivery; or the third day following the day on which the notice or communication has been mailed by certified mail delivery, receipt requested and postage prepaid addressed to the other Party at the address set forth Page - 3 below, or at such other address as the Parties shall from time -to -time designate by notice in writing to the other Party: CITY: COUNTY: City Clerk City of Spokane Valley 11707 E. Sprague Avenue, Suite 106 Spokane Valley, WA, 99206 Board of County Commissioners Spokane County Courthouse 1116 West Broadway Avenue Spokane, Washington 99260 Section 8: HEADINGS The section headings in this Agreement have been inserted solely for the purpose of convenience and ready reference. In no way do they purport to, and shall not be deemed to, define, limit or extend the scope or intent of the sections to which they appertain. Section 9: MODIFICATION No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be valid until the same is reduced to writing and executed with the same formalities as this present Agreement. Section 10: ALL WRITINGS CONTAINED HEREIN This Agreement contains all the terms and conditions agreed upon by the Parties. No other understandings, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind any of the Parties hereto. The City has read and understands all of this Agreement, and now states that no representation, promise or agreement not expressed in this Agreement has been made to induce the City to execute the same. Section 11: LIABILITY The County shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its officers and employees from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the County's intentional or negligent acts or breach of its obligations under the Agreement. The County's duty to indemnify shall not apply to loss or liability caused by the intentional or negligent acts of the City, its officers and employees. The City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the County, its officers and employees from all claims, demands, or suits in law or equity arising from the City's intentional or negligent acts or breach of its obligations under the Agreement. The City's duty to indemnify shall not apply to loss or liability caused by the intentional or negligent acts of the County, its officers and employees. Page - 4 If the comparative negligence of the Parties and their officers and employees is a cause of such damage or injury, the liability, loss, cost, or expense shall be shared between the Parties in proportion to their relative degree of negligence and the right of indemnity shall apply to such proportion. Where an officer or employee of a Party is acting under the direction and control of the other Party, the Party directing and controlling the officer or employee in the activity and/or omission giving rise to liability shall accept all liability for the other Party's officer or employee's negligence. Each Party's duty to indemnify shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement. Each Party waives, with respect to the other Party only, its immunity under RCW Title 51, Industrial Insurance. The Parties have specifically negotiated this provision. Section 12: ANTI -KICKBACK No officer or employee of the City, having the power or duty to perform an official act or action related to this Agreement shall have or acquire any interest in the Agreement, or have solicited, accepted or granted a present or future gift, favor, service or other thing of value from or to any person involved in the Agreement. Section 13: VENUE STIPULATION This Agreement has been and shall be construed as having been made and delivered within the State of Washington. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Washington both as to interpretation and performance. Any action at law, suit in equity or judicial proceeding for the enforcement of this Agreement, or any of its provisions, shall be instituted only in courts of competent jurisdiction within Spokane County, Washington. Section 14: COUNTERPARTS This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which, when so executed and delivered, shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same. Section 15: SEVERABILITY If any parts, terms or provisions of this Agreement are held by the courts to be illegal, the validity of the remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected and the rights and obligations of the Parties shall not be affected in regard to the remainder of the Agreement. If it should appear that any part, term or provision of this Agreement is in conflict with any statutory provision of the State of Washington, then the part, term or provision thereof that may be in conflict shall be deemed inoperative and null and void insofar as it may be in conflict therewith and this Agreement shall be deemed to modify to conform to such statutory provision. Page - 5 Section 16: RCW 39.34 REQUIRED CLAUSES A. PURPOSE: See Section 1. B. DURATION: See Section 2. C. ORGANIZATION OF SEPARATE ENTITY AND ITS POWERS: No new or separate legal or administrative entity is created to administer the provisions of this Agreement. D. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTIES: See Agreement provisions. E. AGREEMENT TO BE FILED: The City shall file this Agreement with its City Clerk. The County shall file this Agreement with its County Auditor or place it on its web site or other electronically retrievable public source. F. FINANCING: See Section 1. G. TERMINATION: See Section 3. H. PROPERTY UPON TERMINATION: See Section 5. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Chair CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Vice Chair Mike Jackson, City Manager Commissioner ATTEST: Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk ATTEST: Approved by: By Ginna Vasquez Office of the City Attorney Clerk of the Board Page - 6 Exhibit I Funding Allocation Methodology RCW 70.94.544 authorizes the CTR Board to determine the allocation of program funds made available for the purpose of implementing CTR plans. The funding allocated for local implementation of CTR activities in July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017 is based on the decision taken by the CTR Board at its October 24, 2014 meeting. At that meeting, the CTR board passed a motion to continue the existing funding policy and grant the same allocation from the previous biennium to implementers in the 2015-2017 biennial allocation. Page - 7 ATTACHMENT "A" STATEMENT OF WORK The County will: 1. Promote consistency within all affected local government jurisdictions within Spokane County, while serving the City's specific needs. 2. Maintain and administer the City's CTR Ordinances and Plan. 3. Employ a full-time Transportation Demand Management Manager to administer the County's and City's CTR Plans and Ordinances. 4. Take reasonable measures to identify and notify all affected employers within the City. 5. Assist each affected employer within the City in preparing a program and promoting the principles of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) with the employer's employees. 6. Maintain an appeals process consistent with RCW 70.94.537(2)(e) by which major employers, who as a result of special characteristics of their business or its locations would be unable to meet the requirements of a commute trip reduction plan, may obtain a waiver or modification of those requirements and criteria for determining eligibility for waiver or modification. Within 30 days from the date of approval, submit to WSDOT the name and employer identification code for any worksite that has been granted an exemption. Include information about the duration of all exemptions and information on the type of modification granted. 7 Submit to WSDOT periodic progress reports summarizing the overall CTR implementation costs incurred by the County and shall be reported in a format provided by WSDOT. 8. Provide WSDOT with a public hearing notice and copies of any proposed amendments to the CTR ordinance, plan, and/or administrative guidelines within the first week of the public review period and final copies of all actions within one (1) month of adoption. 9. Coordinate and administer baseline and measurement CTR employer surveys. Provide employer survey assistance, training and state -supplied survey forms. 10. Notify WSDOT prior to sending any surveys to University of Washington for processing. The notification must include the name of the worksite, employer identification code and type of survey for each survey being submitted for processing. The notification shall be Page - 8 submitted as an electronic spreadsheet via electronic mail. The County agrees to wait for confirmation from WSDOT prior to sending or delivering the surveys for processing. 11. Provide WSDOT with updated lists of affected worksites and jurisdiction contacts on a periodic basis or as requested by WSDOT. These updates will be submitted electronically in a format specified by WSDOT. 12. Continue to monitor the programs of each of the affected employers in the City to determine compliance with the CTR Ordinance and Plan. Complete annual review of employer CTR programs including a determination as to whether the employer is acting in good faith to meet the goals established by the CTR Law. 13. Provide on-going support to all employer designated Employee Transportation Coordinators (ETCs) and assist ETCs in facilitating regular employer networking opportunities and obtaining information necessary to perform their duties including information materials that explain a range of measures and activities to encourage employee use of commute alternatives. 14. Market available services to affected employers to assist in accomplishing CTR goals. 15. Work collaboratively with and provide technical guidance and support to employers in developing successful CTR programs. 16. Conduct at least one Basic ETC Training Course per year, using WSDOT-provided ETC Handbook and other training materials reviewed and approved by WSDOT. 17. Provide employers with written information on basic requirements of the CTR ordinance and goals set forth in approved CTR plans. 18. Attend transportation or health/benefits fairs at affected employer worksites to encourage high -occupancy vehicle commuting and promote the employer's CTR program. 19. Design, construct and distribute worksite Commuting Options Boards. Provide professional materials such as brochures, flyers, posters, newsletters, clip art and other tools to assist employer implementation of worksite CTR programs. 20. Provide all affected employers with the WSDOT-approved "Program Description & Employer Annual Report" form. Ensure completed reports are submitted by affected employers to meet applicable deadlines. 21. Submit to WSDOT periodic invoices along with progress reports that accurately assess the progress made by County, on behalf of City, in implementing RCW 70.94.521-555. Report contents include: a. Detailed summary of CTR events and projects, including implementation assistance provided to affected employers within the City; Page - 9 b. Actual total CTR expenditures used by the County for all state CTR funds expended by the County during the previous quarter for the purpose of CTR implementation using WSDOT pre -approved format; c. Updated list of affected employers and worksites (electronic); d. Total number of worksites by jurisdiction; e. List of sites which have applied for exemptions or modifications; 22. Establish and maintain books, records, documents and other evidence and accounting procedures and practices sufficient to reflect properly all direct and indirect costs of whatever nature claimed to have been incurred and anticipated to be incurred solely for the performance of this Agreement. Establish and maintain a separate "CTR Account" within Spokane County along with supporting documentation such as payroll and time records, invoices, contracts, vouchers or products proving in proper detail the nature and propriety of the charges. 23. Participate in local implementation of statewide CTR public awareness and recognition programs developed by WSDOT. 24. Offer recommendations to the City for policies on parking and site design which will encourage the use of alternative transportation modes. 25. Encourage employers to develop site designs and improvements to office and industrial sites that promote the use of alternative transportation modes. 26. Assist WSDOT with CTR evaluation. 27. Serve as liaison between WSDOT and cities, towns, transit agencies and regional transportation planning organizations for the purpose of RCW 70.94.521-555. 28. Continue applying for funding opportunities to further encourage the use of commute alternatives. Page - 10 ATTACHMENT "B" STATEMENT OF WORK The City will: 1. Provide Spokane County with copies of any proposed amendments to the CTR Plan and Ordinance. 2. Provide Spokane County with copies of any CTR -related amendments to parking ordinances prior to public review. 3. Develop, implement and maintain its own CTR Program as an affected employer or as otherwise specified in the CTR Board Guidelines or RCW 70.94.521-555. 4. Reimburse the County for the services provided by this Agreement in an amount equal to the City's share of the CTR funding as provided in RCW 70.94.544. Page - 11 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 29, 2015 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ❑ admin. report Department Director Approval: ® new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Proposed Resolution #15-012: 2016 Fee Schedule. GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Master Fee Schedule setting 2014 fees was established via Resolution #13-012 and was adopted by the City Council on December 10, 2013. There were no amendments to the fees for 2015. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On December 1, 2015, Council considered an Administrative Report on the proposed resolution establishing 2016 fees, but no formal action has been taken to date. Revenues generated by the fee resolution in 2016 account for: • $2,476,400 or 6.28% of total General Fund recurring revenues of $39,438,428. • $1,870,000 or 99.92% of total Stormwater Management Fund revenues of $1,871,500. BACKGROUND: Part of the annual operating budget development process involves City Departments reviewing the Master Fee Schedule that is currently in place, and determining whether changes in the fees charged and/or language used in the governing resolution should be altered. Recommended changes to the fee resolution are as follows: • The Community and Economic Development Department is proposing one wording change in Schedule B: Other Building Permits in order to update the language on swimming pools to match current adopted building code. • The Parks and Recreation Department is proposing the following changes: o Add a refundable wedding damage deposit of $500 for the Great Room due to CenterPlace experiencing damage from wedding groups. o Add a refundable wedding damage deposit of $500 for the Lounge due to CenterPlace experiencing damage from wedding groups. o Increase the rental fee for the Edgecliff Park shelter and Sullivan Park shelter from $50 to $84 for up to 5 hours in order to be consistently priced with other park shelters. o Increase the refundable damage deposit for picnic shelters from $52 to $75 due to experiencing damage to facilities and turf. o Increase the refundable damage deposit for picnic shelter rentals for weddings, special events and events with 200 people or more from $257 to $300 due to experiencing damage to facilities and turf. o Add the word "refundable" to the deposits for the Great Room and Lounge for clarification. o Add a statement under Aquatics to allow Parks and Recreation to occasionally offer free admission days at the pools P:IClerklAgendaPackets for Web12015Iagendapacket 2015, 12-2911tem 4 RCA for Fee Resolution.docx • Changes to Schedule F — Police Fees are being proposed in order to be consistent with the proposed False Alarm Agreement Extension that is on the agenda for earlier this evening. The changes include: o Reduce the alarm system registration renewal fee to $15 for residential systems and $25 for commercial systems regardless of whether or not the user had experienced a false alarm in the preceding year. Previously, renewal fees were $25 for residential systems and $35 commercial systems unless the user had not had a false alarm in the preceding year, in which case the fees were reduced to $15 and $25, respectively. o Eliminate the $25 appeal fee. o Reduce false alarm response fees to $75 for residential systems and $125 for commercial systems from $85 and $165, respectively. • Other minor wording changes are suggested throughout. OPTIONS: Proceed with the updated fee resolution changes as presented this evening, with or without further modifications. RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Move to approve Resolution #15-012 amending the Master Fee Schedule for 2016. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The proposed changes are not expected to have a significant impact on 2016 revenues. STAFF CONTACT: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director ATTACHMENTS: • Memo from the Parks and Recreation Department that provides a detailed description and rationale for proposed fee changes. • Resolution #15-012 P:IClerklAgendaPackets for Web12015Iagendapacket 2015, 12-2911tem 4 RCA for Fee Resolution.docx Spo :�kane ,00Valley 1h1` ` 44 `.144&4N1414"'?4144?`414444014404N"wN`444014401N`.N`4N"'? `4N"'? `44i4`4N"'? `4N"'? `44i4444014401Ni4144014"'? `4N`414 Memorandum 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 ♦ Fax: 509.921.1008 • cityhall@spokanevalley.org 1414 MEM MOM `M4 4UM44i41EOM 4 4UM4 44 ` M4 4 MUM4 4414 I To: City Council Members; Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Michael D. Stone, CPRP, Director of Parks and Recreation Date: December 3, 2015 Re: 2016 Fee Resolution Proposals - Corrected The Parks and Recreation Department would like to propose some changes to the current fee resolution for 2016. Proposed Changes: • Add a Refundable Wedding Damage Deposit of $500 for the Great Room at CenterPlace. Currently we are experiencing damage to our facility and the breaking of our rules by wedding groups. The current refundable deposit is $210 and it is not sufficient enough to encourage these groups to respect our facility and comply with our rules. • Add a Refundable Wedding Damage Deposit fee of $500 for the Lounge at CenterPlace. Reasons are the same as the above item. • Increase the rental fee for the Edgecliff Park Shelter and the Sullivan Park Shelter from $50 to $84 for up to five hours. This is to allow this shelter to be consistently priced with our other shelters. • Increase the refundable damage deposit for picnic shelter rentals from $52 to $75. Currently we are experiencing damage to our facility and turf and the breaking of our rules. The current refundable deposit is not sufficient to encourage these groups to respect our facility and comply with our rules. • Increase the refundable damage deposit for picnic shelter rentals for weddings, special events and events with 200 people or more from $257 to $300. Reasons the same as the above item. • One housekeeping item. Add the word "refundable" to the deposits for the Great Room and Lounge. They have always been refundable, but the fee schedule did not reflect that. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please let me know. Thank you. 1 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON RESOLUTION NO. 15-012 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON, AMENDING RESOLUTION 13-012 AND APPROVING AN AMENDED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE, AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO. WHEREAS, it is the general policy of the City to establish fees that are reflective of the cost of services provided by the City; and WHEREAS, the City uses a resolution to establish fees for City programs, permits and services, and periodically the fee resolution must be amended to incorporate new or modified services; and WHEREAS, Council desires to amend the Resolution and accompanying Fee Schedule. NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington, as follows: Section 1. The amendments needed at this time are incorporated into the attached schedules and include new fees and changes to existing fees. Section 2. Repeal. To the extent that previous fee schedules are inconsistent with those set forth herein, they are repealed in their entirety. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect January 1, 2016. Approved this 29th day of December, 2015. ATTEST: CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Christine Bainbridge, City Clerk Dean Grafos, Mayor Approved as to form: Office of the City Attorney Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 1 of 14 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Fee Schedule Page No. Schedule A- Planning 3 Schedule B: Building 5 Schedule C: Parks and Recreation 10 Schedule D: Administrative 13 Schedule E: Other Fees 13 Schedule F: Police Fees 14 Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 2 of 14 MASTER FEE SCHEDULE Schedule A — Planning AMENDMENTS Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning or other code text amendment APPEALS Appeal of Administrative Decision Appeal of Hearing Examiner Findings Transcript/record deposit on Appeals of Hearing Examiner Decisions Appeal of Administrative Decision - Code Compliance Notice and Order ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) Single Dwelling (when required) All other developments Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Review, minimum deposit Addenda of existing EIS Review SHORELINE Substantial Development Permit Shoreline Exemption CRITICAL AREAS Floodplain Permit not associated with a subdivision Floodplain Permit associated with a subdivision OTHER PERMITS Home Occupation Permit and Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) Conditional Use Permit Temporary Use Permit LAND USE ACTIONS Subdivisions Preliminary plat Final Plat Time extensions — file review and letter Short Plats Preliminary 2 to 4 lots Final plat 2 to 4 lots Preliminary plat 5 to 9 lots Final plat 5 to 9 lots Time extensions — file review and letter FEE AMOUNT $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,050.00 $315.00 $157.00 $500.00 $100.00 $350.00 $2,200.00 $350.00 $840.00 $420.00 $315.00 $315.00 + $52.00 per lot $84.00 $840.00 $157.00 $2,324.00 + $40.00 per lot $1,424.00 + $10.00 per lot $80.00 $1,224.00 $924.00 $1,424.00 + $25.00 per lot $1,224.00 + $10.00 per lot $80.00 Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 3 of 14 Plat Alteration Subdivision plat Short plat Plat Vacation Binding Site Plan Binding site plan alteration Change of Conditions Preliminary binding site plan Creating lots within final binding site plan via Record of Survey Final Binding Site Plan Aggregation/Segregation Lot line adjustment Lot line elimination Zero lot line SIGNS Review of permanent sign Review of temporary sign NEW RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN REVIEW SITE PLAN REVIEW - PER DIVISION REVIEW $682.00 $278.00 $1,474.00 $278.00 $650.00 $1,674.00 $500.00 $924.00 $105.00 $105.00 $105.00 + $10.00 per lot $50.00 + $25.00 if public works review needed $50.00 $50.00 $275.00 STREET VACATION APPLICATION $1,365.00 OTHER Administrative Exception $315.00 Variance $1,575.00 Administrative Interpretations $100.00 Pre -application Meetings $250.00 Fee shall be deducted from land use application, building permit or commercial permit application fee- when application is filed within one year of pre -application meeting, ZONING Zoning map amendments (rezone)* Planned residential development plan Planned residential development modification Zoning letter $1,650.00 $1,575.00 + $26.00 per lot $525.00 $210.00 *If rezone is combined with other action(s), cost of other action(s) is additional Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 4 of 14 Schedule B — Building Fee Payment Plan review fees are collected at the time of application. Such fees may be adjusted during plan review. Overages or under payments shall be appropriately adjusted at the time of permit issuance. Plan review fees are separate from and additional to building permit fees. Permit fees and any other unpaid fees arc shall be collected prior to issuance of the permit. Fees for outside professional services required during the permit process 1—shall be paid by the applicant. Examples of outside professional services include review by contract reviewers, special inspection or construction services, consultant services for special topics, surveying or other services required to determine compliance with applicable codes. Fee Refund Policy. Refunds authorized under this policy apply only to Schedule B. PLAN REVIEW FEES • Plan review fees are non-refundable once any plan review work has been started. • Paid plan review fees will may be refunded when an eligible request is received in writing. • At a minimum, a $35.00 administrative fee will -shall be retained. • If the paid plan review fee is less than $35.00, no refund is authorized. • If the paid plan review fee is more than $35.00, the amount for refund wi4l-shall be calculated at the rate of 100% of the paid plan review fee minus $35.00. PERMIT FEES • Permit fees are non-refundable once work authorized by the permit has begun. • Paid permit fees will shallmay be refunded when an eligible request is received in writing. • Ast a minimum, a $35.00 administrative fee will be retained when fees are refunded. • If the paid permit fee is less than $35.00, no refund is authorized. • If the paid permit fee is more than $35.00, the refund shall be calculated at the rate of 95% of the paid permit fee minus $35.00. For any application taken or permit issued in error, a full refund of fees paid will—shall be made. No portion of the paid fees shall be retained. FEES GENERAL Hourly Rate for City Employees Overtime rate for City Employees (1.5 times regular rate) Investigation fee: Work commenced without required permits Replacement of lost permit documents $61.00 $92.00 Equal to permit fee Hourly rate; 1 hour minimum Revisions to plans requested by the applicant or permit holder shall be charged the hourly rate with a minimum of one hour. Revised plans submitted in response to reviewer correction letters are not subject to the hourly assessment. Washington State Building Code Council Surcharge (WSBCC) $4.50 per permit WSBCC Surcharge (Multi -Family) $4.50 1st dwelling unit + $2.00 each additional unit Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 5 of 14 BUILDING PERMIT: Building permit fees for each project are set by the following fees. The figures below are to shall be used to determine the building permit fees and plans check fees based on the value of the construction work as stated by the applicant or the value calculated by the Building Official using the latest valuation data published in the Building Safety Journal by the International Code Council, whichever value is greater. Valuations not listed in the Building Safety Journal: Building Type Residential garages/storage buildings (wood frame) Residential garages (masonry) Miscellaneous residential pole buildings Residential carports, decks, porches Valuation Per Square Foot $19.00 $22.00 $19.00 $15.00 Building Permit Fee Calculation Total Valuation Building Permit Fee $1.00 to $25,000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $69.25 for first $2,000.00 + $14.00 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereof) Up to and including $25,000.00 $391.25 for first $25,000 + $10.10 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereof) Up to and including $50,000.00 $643.75 for first $50,000.00 + $7.00 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereof) Up to and including $100,000.00 $993.75 for first $100,000 + $5.60 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereof) Up to and including $500,000.00 $3,233.75 for first $500,000.00 + $4.75 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereof) Up to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001 and up $5,608.75 for first $1,000,000.00 + $3.15 for each additional $1,000.00 (or fraction thereof) Plan Review Fee Calculation % of Building Permit Fee Plans review fee (general) 65% Plans review fee — Group R-3 occupancies (single family less than 7,999 sq ft) 40% Plans review fee — Group R-3 occupancies (single family 8,000 sq ft or more) 65% Plans review fee — Group U occupancies (sheds, barns, et.) 25% Initial Plan Review Fees are capped at $35,000 not including pass-through expenses for outside review as noted in the "Fee Payment" section of this schedule. Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 6 of 14 OTHER BUILDING PERMITS: Over -the -Counter Service Demolition Permit Single Family Residence Commercial Buildings Garage or accessory building associated with residence or commercial building Foundation Only: Swimming Pools, over 5,000 gallonsover 2 feet morin depth Re -roof (no plan review charge unless submitted for review) Change of Use or Occupancy Classification Permit Towers, elevated tanks, antennas $61.00 flat fee $46.00 flat fee $131.00 flat fee $21.00 flat fee 25% of building permit fee $52.00 + -plumbing fees Based on Project Valuation Hourly Hourly GRADING PERMIT: 100 cubic yards (cu yd) or less $21.00 101 to 1,000 cubic yards 1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards 10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards 100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards 200,000 or more cubic yards GRADING PLAN REVIEW FEE: 50 cubic yards or less 51 to 100 cubic yards 101 to 1,000 1,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 100,000 100,001 to 200,000 200,001 or more Land Clearing Only (without earth being moved) Paving Permit (greater than 5,000 sq. ft. — new paving only) $21.00 for first 100 cu yd. + $7.00 each additional 100 cu yd $88.00 for first 1,000 cu yd + $6.00 each additional 1,000 cu yd $154.00 for first 10,000 cu yd+ $15.00 each additional 10,000 cu yd $386.00 for first 100,000 cu yd + $15.00 each additional 100,000 cu yd $528.00 for first 200,000 cu yd + $15.00 for each additional 200,000 cu yd No Fee $12.00 $21.00 $27.00 $27.00 for first 100,000 cu yd + $7.00 each additional 10,000 cu yd $104.00 for first 100,000 cu yd + $6.00 for each additional 100,000 cu yd $166.00 $68.00 $263.00 Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 7 of 14 MECHANICAL PERMIT: Plan review fees for mechanical permits shall be collected at the time of application as noted in the "Fee Payment" section of this schedule. Permit fees will shall be collected when the permit is issued. If submitted as part of a building permit application, the unit costs are added, but not the "basic" fee for issuing the permit. Mechanical Permit Fees A. BASIC FEES 1. Basic fee for issuing each permit 2. Basic fee for each supplemental permit B. UNIT FEES (in addition to the basic fee) 1. Installation or relocation of Furnaces and suspended heaters a. up to and including 100,000 btu b. over 100,000 btu 2. Duct work system 3. Heat pump and air conditioner a. 0 to 3 tons b. over 3 tons to 15 tons c. over 15 tons to 30 tons d. over 30 tons to 50 tons e. over 50 tons 4. Gas water heater 5. Gas piping system 6. Gas log, fireplace, and gas insert installation 7. Appliance vents installation; relocation; replacement 8. Boilers, compressors, and absorption systems a. 0 to 3 hp - 100,000 btu or less b. over 3 to 15 hp - 100,001 to 500,000 btu c. over 15 - 30 hp - 500,001 to 1,000,000 btu d. over 30 ph -1,000,001 to 1,750,000 btu e. over 50 hp - over 1,750,000 btu 9. Air Handlers a. each unit up to 10,000 cfm, including ducts b. each unit over 10,000 cfm 10. Evaporative Coolers (other than portable) 11. Ventilation and Exhausts a. each fan connected to a single duct b. each ventilation system c. each hood served by mechanical exhaust 12. Incinerators a. residential installation or relocation b. commercial installation or relocation 13. Unlisted appliances a. under 400,000 btu b. 400,000 btu or over 14. Hood a. Type I b. Type II 15. LP Storage Tank 16. Wood or Pellet Stove insert 17. Wood stove system - free standing $37.00 $8.00 $13.00 $16.00 $11.00 $13.00 $21.00 $26.00 $37.00. $63.00 $11.00 $1.00 per outlet $11.00 $10.00 each $13.00 $21.00 $26.00 $37.00 $63.00 $13.00 $16.00 $11.00 $11.00 $13.00 $13.00 $21.00 $23.00 $52.00 $105.00 $52.00 $11.00 $11.00 $11.00 $26.00 Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 8 of 14 PLUMBING PERMIT: Plan review fees for mechanical permits shall be collected at the time of application as noted in the "Fee Payment" section of this schedule. Permit fees will shall be collected when the permit is issued. If submitted as part of a building permit application, the unit costs are shall be added, but not the "basic" fee for issuing the permit. A. BASIC FEES 1. Basic fee for issuing each permit $37.00 2. Basic fee for each supplemental permit $8.00 B. UNIT FEES (in addition to the basic fee) 1. Each plumbing fixture on a trap $6.00 each (includes garbage disposals, dishwashers, backflow device, drainage, hot tubs, built-in water softener, water closets, lavatories, sinks, drains, etc.) 2. Water Heater $6.00 each 3. Industrial waste pretreatment interceptor $16.00 (includes its trap and vent, except kitchen type grease interceptors functioning as fixture traps.) 4. Repair or alteration of water piping, drainage or vent piping 5. Atmospheric type vacuum breaker 6. Backflow protective device other than atmospheric type vacuum breakers 7. Medical gas 8. Interceptors $6.00 each fixture $6.00 each $6.00 each $6.00 per outlet $6.00 each RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT: A traffic plan and traffic plan review is required if more than 50% of the width of any street is closed or if a single arterial lane is closed. A minimum plan review fee of $61.00 (hourly rate for eCity employees) applies to all right-of-way permits that require a traffic plan. If additional staff time is required, it will shall be charged at the hourly rate. Cate2ory 1. Non -cut obstruction without clean up 2. Non -cut obstruction with clean up 3. Pavement cut obstruction, non -winter 4. Pavement cut obstruction, winter 5. Approach Permit SIGN PERMIT: Sign permits arc shall be subject to assessment Sign Permits are shall also be subject to the "General" section. Signs mounted on buildings Sign and pole mounting $73.00 $110.00 $168.00 $210.00 $52.00 of planning division review fees as found in Schedule A. assessment of the WSBCC fee as noted in Schedule B $48.00 per sign (flat fee) $68.00 per sign (flat fee) Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 9 of 14 Schedule C - Parks and Recreation ADMINISTRATIVE FEES Basic fees to be considered when applying rates Administrative Fee Refuse Fee AQUATICS Pool admission (age 5 and under) Pool admission (age older than 5) Pool punch pass (25 swims) Weekend family discount - 1 child under 13 free with paying adult At the discretion of the City Manager, the Parks and Recreation Department may on occasion offer free admission open swim days. $32.00 $52.00 free $1.00 $20.00 Swimming Lessons Swim Team Fee Reservation (less than 50 people) Food fee (less than 50 people, if applicable) Reservation (50-100 people) Food fee (50-100 people, if applicable) Reservation (101-150 people) Food fee (101-150 people, if applicable) **Minimum 2 hours ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE PERMIT CENTERPLACE Conference Center Wing Auditorium Auditorium Auditorium Auditorium w/Presentation System Auditorium w/Presentation System Auditorium w/Presentation System Auditorium Deposit Executive Conference Room Executive Conference Room Deposit Meeting Room (day and evening use) Meeting Room Large Meeting Room Large Meeting Room Large Meeting Room Meeting Room Meeting Room Deposit Patio Event Package Portable Sound System Platinum Package $35.00 $45.00 $105.00 per hour** $25.00 $131.00 per hour** $52.00 $157.00 per hour** $79.00 $10.00 $79.00 per hour $475.00 per day $236.00 per half day $52.00 per hour* * * $315.00 per day*** $158.00 per half day* * * $52.00 $52.00 per hour $52.00 $42.00 per hour $263.00 per day $75.00 per hour $225.00 per half day $450.00 per 9 hr. day $131.00 per half day $52.00 $500.00 per event $150.00 per event $500.00 per event Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 10 of 14 *** Requires rental of presentation system, see next page Great Room Kitchen deposit Multi-use/Banquet Hall Multi-use/Banquet Hall Multi-use/Banquet Hall Small Dining Area Refundable Deposit Refundable Deposit - Weddings Stage Stage Removal Table Settings (linens and tableware) Pipe & Drape rental Chair Cover rental Senior Center Wing Lounge with Dance Floor Lounge with Dance Floor Refundable Lounge deposit Refundable Lounge deposit - Weddings Meeting room (evening use) Meeting room (evening use) Meeting room (weekend use) Meeting room (weekend use) Meeting room deposit Private Dining Room Private dining room deposit Wellness Center $452.00 $105.00 per hour $840.00 per 9 hr session $1,575.00 all day (6 a.m.-1 a.m.) $52.00 per hour $210.00 $500.00 $21.00 per section per day $150.00 $3.00 per place setting $100/day $3/chair per day Miscellaneous Cleanup fee Host/Hostess (after hours) Presentation System * * * (includes projector, podium, DVD/VCR Room Setup Satellite Video Conferencing Sound System Technical Support Television/VCR Touch Pad Voting System LCD Projector LCD Projector Coffee Service Linens Only Wine glass only rental Children's Birthday Package sound system, camera system) $105.00 per hour $850.00 per 6 hours $210.00 $500.00 $42.00 per hour $131.00 per 4 hr session $262.00 per day $131.00 per half day $52.00 $52.00 per hour $52.00 $105.00 per hour $52 to $315.00 per event $16.00 per hour $262.00 per day $26.00 per hour $262.00 per hour $42.00 per day $42.00 per hour $79.00 per day $121.00 base station per day + $16.00 per keypad per day per hour $25.00 per hour $100.00 per day $25.00 service $5.00 per table $.50 per glass $175.00 per package Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 11 of 14 Business Incentive Rental Policy — The Parks & Recreation Director has the authority to reduce the room rental rate by 4 -one hr. when the rental meets the following criteria- minimum of 25 participants; utilize a classroom at CenterPlace height or more times per calendar year; and use in-house caterer for a meal each reservation. PICNIC SHELTER RESERVATION (For groups fewer than 200 people) Browns (up to five hours) Edgecliff (up to five hours) Discovery Playground #1 (up to two hours) Discovery Playground #2 (up to two hours) Greenacres — large (up to five hours) Mirabeau Meadows — shelter and stage (up to five hours) Mirabeau Springs — shelter and dock (up to two hours) Sullivan (up to five hours) Terrace View (up to five hours) Valley Mission (up to five hours) $845-950.00 $8450.00 $35.00 $35.00 $84.00 $84.00 $250.00 $084.00 $84.00 $84.00 EVENT RESERVATION — include shelter (For groups of 200 or more people) Events include but are not limited to activities such as car shows, tournaments, or high-risk activities. The Parks and Recreation Director shall make the final determination. General fee (up to five hours): $157.00 Non-profit applications with proof of qualifying as a 501(c)(3) entity €ee—(up to five hours): $84.00 VALLEY MISSION HORSE ARENA Rental is for Fri -Sun $105.00 per weekend EVENT PHOTOS Mirabeau Springs shelter and dock $150.00 per hour BALL FIELD RENTAL/USE $26.00 1st hour + $15.00 each additional hour REFUNDABLE DAMAGE DEPOSIT Fewer than 200 people Weddings, Special Events and events with 200 or more people $7552.00 $300257.00 SPECIAL EVENTS (See Spokane Valley Municipal Code 5.15) Application Fee $40.00 RECREATION Recreation program fees are set established at amounts to recover costs, as specified in the Parks and Recreation revenue policy. Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 12 of 14 Schedule D — Administration COPY FEE Copy of audio tapes, video tapes, DVD, CD's, etc. Copy of written documents in excess of 6 pages Copy large format documents (24" x 36" or greater) Hourly rate to transfer scanned records to electronic disc A deposit of 10% may be required on public record requests At Cost $.15 per page $3.00 per page $19.00 per hour NSF Check return fee $26.00 Schedule E — Other Fees BUSINESS REGISTRATION Business Registration Nonprofit Registration $13.00 annual $3.00 annual Late Business Registration Fee: (charged in addition to the business registration fee) (SVMC 5.05.050) Failure to pay the registration fee by the applicable date shall result in a late fee of 50% of the annual registration fee. Failure to pay the annual fee may result in non -issuance of a Washington State license, as determined by the Washington State Department of Licensing. Adult Entertainment Establishment License, Live Adult Entertainment Establishment License, Adult Arcade Adult Arcade Device License Manager License Entertainer License Late Adult Entertainment License Fee (charged in addition to the license fee) 7 to 30 calendar days past due 31 to 60 calendar days past due 61 and more calendar days past due Appeal of Administrative Determination — Adult Entertainment License Adult Entertainment License denial, suspension or revocation pursuant to SVMC 5.10 $1,575.00 $1,575.00 $157.00 $157.00 $157.00 25% of license fee 50% of license fee 75% of license fee $1,050.00 TOW OPERATOR REGISTRATION FEE $105.00 annual OVERSIZED LOAD PERMIT FEE $26.00 STORMWATER UTILITY CHARGE ON DEVELOPED PARCELS: Each single-family unit $21.00 annual All other properties each $21.00 per 3,160 sq. ft impervious surface Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 13 of 14 Schedule F — Police Fees 1 Initial Aalarm system registration Residential alarm systems Commercial alarm systems Alarm system re2istration renewal Residential alarm systems Commercial alarm systems $25.00 annual $35.00 annual $15.00 annual $25.00 annual [If the alarm site has no false alarms during the registration year, the following year's registration fee will shall be reduced to $15.00 per year for residential, and $25.00 per year for commercial.] Discounted alarm re2istration fees The annual registration fees and false alarm cost recovery fees are reduced by 50% for eligible citizens. To qualify for the fee reduction, an eligible person a. has a gross annual income of less than $19,100 for a one-person household or b. has a gross annual income of less than $21,850 for households of two or more persons or c. is substantially disabled, meaning that the person has a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities or functions, such as caring for oneself, performing manual tasks such as walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing and learning. Appeal regarding a false alarm $25.00 Service fees for response to a false alarm: Residential false alarm incident Commercial false alarm incident $85.0075.00 per incident $165.00125.00 per incident Resolution 15-012 Amending Fee Schedule for 2016 Page 14 of 14 CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 29, 2015 Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ information ® admin. report AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Library District Update Department Director Approval: ❑ ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ pending legislation ❑ executive session BACKGROUND: The City purchased 8.4 acres of vacant property in 2013 following entry of an interlocal agreement with the Spokane County Library District (SCLD) whereby SCLD agreed to purchase 2.82 acres of that property for construction of a new Spokane Valley library facility with surrounding grounds. The interlocal agreement contained a provision that if SCLD was unable to successfully pass a bond measure at the ballot, the City would re -purchase the 2.8 acres after October 23, 2017. Staff received the following information from Library Executive Nancy Ledeboer: "In October of 2012, the City of Spokane Valley entered into an agreement with Spokane County Library District (SCLD) to purchase land on Sprague Avenue for the purpose of building a library adjacent to an expanded city park. The agreement stipulated that if SCLD was not able to raise funds to build the library by 2017, the City would purchase the portion of the land paid for by SCLD in order to proceed with developing a park. In 2014, voters approved the formation of the Spokane Valley Library Capital Facilities Area, however the request for funding new library facilities fell short of the 60% needed with only 55% approval. The Library Board went back to the voters in 2015 with a reduced request for funding and received 57.7% approval, still short of the required super majority. The Spokane Valley Capital Faculties Area was dissolved after the second failed attempt for voter approved funding. Library Trustees have no plans to ask voters for funding in the near future, and will be unable to build on the property as outlined in the agreement with the City of Spokane Valley. Since we will be unable to build a new library, we are requesting that the City of Spokane Valley purchase the portion of the Sprague property owned by SCLD." SCLD is now asking the City to consider amending the interlocal agreement it has with the City to change the date for re -acquisition by the City, moving it up from October 23, 2017 to any time after January 1, 2016. SCLD would presumably then initiate the process for selling the property back to the City shortly thereafter, with the normal closing process to follow. OPTIONS: Council discretion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: SCLD acquired 2.82 acres January 31, 2014 for $839,285. These funds in the amount of $839,285, generated from the sale of the property in 2014, have been retained in the Civic Facility Capital Project Fund #310. If approved, payment would be made from that account. STAFF/OTHER CONTACT: Spokane County Library District Executive Director Ms. Nancy Ledeboer and Library Board Member Mr. Tim Hattenburg ATTACHMENTS: 2012 Interlocal Agreement for Acquisition of Real Estate (see highlighted areas of the contract, specifically Item 10) INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR ACQUISITION OF REAL ESTATE BETWEEN CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY AND SPOKANE COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT This Agreement is made by and between the CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY ("City") and the SPOKANE COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT, a Washington municipal corporation ("Library District") collectively referred to herein as the 'Parties", based upon the following Recitals_ The Agreement shall become effective as of the date the last Pasty hereto executes this Agreement. RECITALS A. WHEREAS, the Parties each have need of acquiring real property in furtherance oftheir respective public purposes, and Ft. WHEREAS, four contiguous parcels of real property comprising approximately 8.4 acres located on the corner of Sprague arid Herald within the City and legally described on the attached Exhibit "A", (the "Property') have been identified by the Parties as appropriate to their needs. The Spokane County parcel numbers are 45174 9053, 45174.9054, 4S174 9055, and 45174.9056; and C. WHEREAS, City anticipates entering into negotiations with the owner of the Property, Pring Corporation ("Pring"), whereby the City would purchase the Property from Pring; and 1D. WI-iEREAS, the Library District for its purposes needs between two and one-half and three and one-half acres of the Property while the City needs the balance; and 1:1SYCDOCS12632110949, AGREEt1a07874 1 FE.WHEREAS, the Parties hereto wish to enter into this Agreement for the purpose of agreeing intly develop the Property and to provide for dividing the Property between the City and the ary District at a Later date such that the interests cf both Parries will he served; and E. WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that there will be costs to construct frontage improvements directly related to the anticipated development activity of the respective Parties, and that the Parties need to apportion those costs between themselves; and G. WHEREAS, pursuant to RCW 36.34,340, the City is authorized to acquire by purchase title to real property for park and recreational purposes; and H. WHEREAS, RCW 39.33.010 authorizes governmental entities to transfer real property between themselves as set forth in RCW 39.33.020, and T. WHEREAS, RCW 39,34.030(1) provides that any power or authority capable of being exercised by a public agency of this state may be exercised jointly 4vith any other public agency of this state, NOW THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing recitals, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Joint Board. No joint board or agency shall be created as a result of this interlocal agreement between the Parties. Any action taken pursuant to the terms of this agreement must be separately approved by the governing boards of each Party. 2. Purchase of Proiedv. The City will negotiate in good faith with Pring regarding a Real Estate Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Purchase and Sale Agreemerzt") for the purchase of the Property, 3. Purchase Price. The Library District, contemporaneous with the Closing between the City and Pring, and subject to mutual agreement on the price paid by the City to Pring, shall pay to the City an amount equal to the per square foot Purchase Price of the Property based upon the total number of square feet. of the Property determined by the survey times two and one-half acres (108,900 sq. ft.) together with the sarne proportionate share of any survey, title, recording, closing, and phase 1 environmental audit costs. Any appraisal fees shall be paid entirely by the City. The City is not represented by any Realtor, and shall not pay any fees related to services provided by any Realtor related to purchasing the Property unless otherwise agreed to in writing. I:4' P(aDOCS'.263214a4UGfi}AGRGL•'.1007$01 4. Title. Thu Parties agree that the Purchase and Sale Agreement shall reflect that the Purchase Price at Closing shall be paid in cash and that title to the Property sha21 be taken in the name of the City, subject to the contract right of ownership by the Library District of at least 2.5 acres, as identified in this Agreement. This contract right of ownership is enforceable in ars action for specific performance. 5 Closing. Closing of the transaction to purchase the Property shall occur on or before a date mutually acceptable to the City and Pring, 6. Joint Site Development Plan. Within one year following the Closing, the Patties shall work together to A. mutually select a consultant team; and B, draft and finalize a Joint Site Development Plan with the goal of agreeing, among other things, on how much of the Property the Library District will require for its purposes, and location of the same. The Parties intend that the Joint Site Development Plan shall include building footprints, parking, curb cuts, sidewalks, storm water management, access including reciprocal access and parking easements if any, and any other matters that the Parties deem desirable to be included as part of such Joint Site Development Plan. The Library .District anticipates that its needs will include the following: A. A minimum of a 30,000 square foot building on one floor, that will serve as a destination facility with programming intended to draw participants from the Spokane County region. B. The exterior building image should provide a sense that this building is a library and an important civic and community building. This can be accomplished by using timeless, quality materials like brick, stone, concrete and composite metal panels to name a few_ C. Site Requirements: • Building footprint a minimum of 30,000 square feet. • Vehicular access required for rear service entrance. r-Sponacs12G32iUICIOD tiAGRED.tu)7 a 3 • Appropriate parking to meet the City's code minimum requirements for a public library, with a 100 seat meeting room. • Require frontage on or clear visibility from Sprague Avenue but not from behind a parking lot. • At least one side of library building adjacent and open to landscaped park area. The City anticipates that its needs will include the following: A Land for a park OF other civic uses B. Due to civic nature of the site, shared hardscape such as walkways and plaza anticipated C. Potential amenities to consider. • parking • reading garden • public market space • ci +ic plaza and fountain • flag display/Veteran's memorial • small picnic shelter • large shelter • performance/gathering place • seasonal cafe place • open field • walking loop(treil IASPODOCS 063 2 10:10006‘AOR zudon7R74 4 + art/sculpture walk D. Site requirements' • Public access to library restrooms • Park frontage an Sprague • Off-street parking for City users (shared parking with library) Fundamental to the understanding between the Parties hereto is that as of the date hereof, neither Party is in a position to know precisely how the Property should be divided such that the resulting two parcels will maximize the use and benefit to each Party ofthe Property for the Parties' respective needs to the extent allowed by law. To that end, the Parties agree that as of the date hereof, the number cf square of feet and the precise location of the boundary line to be created cannot be known until completion of the Joint Site Development Plan. The Parties therefore agree to cooperate in good faith with each other to arrive at a mutually satisfactory arrangement for dividing the property as reflected in the Joint Site Development Plan, Any engineering or ether consulting fees incurred in this process shall be split equally. Allocation of costs for a traffic study that addresses impacts of anticipated development is the subject ofa separate Memorandum of Understanding between the Parties. Based upon the traffic study, the Parties have identified certain right-of-way improvements or site -wide improvements (collectively referred to as "frontage improvements) that are necessary for the respective proposed projects. The Parties agree to split the frontage improvements currently identified in the traffic study on an equal basis. The frontage improvements currently identified are set forth in Exhibit 13, attached hereto. Allocation of additional costs for any other frontage improvements that are necessitated by or otherwise determined as part of the Joint Site Development Plan will be as agreed by the Parties within 30 days al -completion of the Joint Site Development Plan_ The Parties will negotiate the allocation of any such additional frontage improvement costs in good faith. 7. Property Adiustmeet. If, as a result ofthe Joint Site Development Plan process the Library District determines that it needs more than 2.5 acres, then the City agrees that it will sell to the Library District at the original per square foot Purchase Price up to one additional acre of the Property. Payment to the City by the Library District of any additional property in excess of the anginal 2.5 acres shall be made ort or before recording of the Deed described in Section 8 below. Any costs incurred for the boundary lire adjustment process, and any surveying fees and fees far preparation and recording ofthe Deed shrill IN paid for by the Library District. Any legal fees incurred by the Parties shall be the separate rc:; onsi ilicv cach_ [:ssPCDoCS'+26321 M AA.C3REE11447$74 &. Deed to Library District, Within 30 days after completion of the Joint Site Development Plan, the Parties will cooperate to initiate the process to adjust the boundary line as agreed in the Joint. Site Development Plan through a boundary line adjustment. Within 10 days of the completion of the boundary line adjustment, the City will convey to the Library District by deed that portion of the Property designated for the Library District on the Joint Site Development Plan to the Library District. 9. Failure of Joint Site Development Ytan, In the event that, despite their good faith best efforts, the Parties are unable to agree on a Joint Site Development Plan as described above, and absent an agreement between the Parties to extend the deadline far developing such Joint Site Development Plan, then City shall, within 60 days after the final deadline for developing the Joint Site Development Plan, reimburse the Library District the full amount of that portion of the Purchase Price together with the pro -rata share of any survey, title, recording, closing, and phase I environmental audit costs paid by the Library District and from that point in time this agreement would be considered void_ Each Party shall pay one-half of the costs of the Joint Site Development Plan if the project does not go forward, either due to failure to agree on a Joint Site Development Plan or because the District does not pass its bond. as set forth in Section 10. 10. Re -Purchase by City In order to construct a library building and ancillary improvements on the portion ofttae Property acquired.by the Library District, it is anticipated that the Library District will need to secure voter approval ofa District -wide bond levy covering this and other projects. Without voter approval of such bond, the Library District will not be in a position to develop its portion of the Property. The Parties agree that in the event that the Library District has not, within five years following the Closing, secured voter approval of a construction bond for the library building and ancillary improvements in such amount as .shall be determined necessary by the Library District, that thereafter the Library District shall reconvey all of the Property back to the City at the same price paid by the Library District to the Citr. Such payment shall be paid all in cash, The Library District, in such event, shall convey title to !be City with the same type of instrument as it received the Property from the City, and from that i:cirtt in time this agreement would be considered void;. itt the event the construction bond is approved, the Library District shall commence construction within one year of the date ofvoter approval of the construction bored, 11. Maintena.nce Costs. The City agrees to maintain the Property, including that portion deeded to the Library District, until such time as the Library District shall begin development of its property. Maintenance is anticipated to include weed control and trash removal, and the Library District agrees to reimburse the City an an annual basis its proportionate share of such costs. The District and City shall negotiate in good faith the allocation of maintenance costs for the external library grounds both during the period of construction of the library facility, as well as maintenance costs once the facility is constructed. 12. Elul Preuerly. The City agrees that its portion of the Property will be dedicated to public use and will not be sold to any third party. The Library District agrees that its portion of r [..s1c ecics�2a321tufo [tneaLD[ 74 6 the Property will be developed into a public library facility provided that funding for such project is secured as provided above in Section 10. The City, at its expense, will be allowed to use the entire site for civic purposes until the District provides the City with a notice that the District will commence construction activities in 30 days The City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the District from and against all claims, causes of action, and damages arising out of the City's use of the Property for any such civic purposes. 13, Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be. binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, legal representative, agents, attorneys, successors and assigns. 14. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the sole and entire agreement between tic Parties, and there is no other agreement, either oral or in writing, which modifies the trains of this Agreement. No statement, promises, or inducements made by either Party or a.ny agetr: of either Party that is not contained in this written Agreement shall be valid or binding. Any enlargement, modification or alteration of this Agreement is binding only if executed in writing and signed by all Parties hereto. 15. Attorneys' Fees. In any action to enforce thLs.Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to recover expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, at all trial and appellate levels, including any bankruptcy proceedings, l45. Venue. This Agreement is entered into in the State of Washington and venue of any action shall be the Superior Court for Spokane County. 17. Notices_ All notices, demands or other communications which are required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing, and either personally delivered or mailed to the other Party at the address set forth below its signature on this Agreement, or at such other addresses as either party may give to the other by notice in writing pursuant to the terms of this paragraph. 18. Waiver. Waiver by either Party of any covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement shall not operate as or be considered to be a waiver by such Party of any other covenant, condition or provision hereof, or of any subsequent breach of either Party. 19. Additional Acts. The Parties each hereby agree to perform, execute and/or deliver or cause to be performed, executed and/or delivered, any and all such further acts, documents and assurances as may be reasonably required to consummate the transaction -contemplated hereby. 1.'61,01)0=2632 0.OU161AGREEvn01$74 7 2C. Recording of Agreement, Pursuant to the provisions of RCVS 3934.040, this Interlocal Agreement shall be filed with the office of the Spokane County Auditor. 21. Negotiation and Construction. This Agreement, and each of the terms and provisions hereof, are deemed to have been explicitly negotiated between the Parties, and the language in all parts afthis Agreement shall, in all cases, be construed according to its fair meaning and not strictly for or against either Party. 22. Representation of Authoritx. Each person who executes this Agreement represents and warrants to the Parties that he or she has the authority to do so SPOKANE COUNTY L[BRARY (DISTRICT CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY 13 datin) Print Name: i VI.M1J F} fie' Print NEJfle: 11:74 arizie e'vi Title: Eyes hvg, vee Title: E Address: .431 . ,IV. itYG¢r , It Address! / / 7 i 5potatlelithl Dated: eV/ //a,' Approved as to Form: Philip S. Brooke, ttorney at Law Dated: 6'(ll' *04,41jell tie? Dated:, Wti Approved as to Form. City Atto :1' Y l:tisPoadc542432100OAGf1CT.1 f}f}7.7.1 a EXHIBIT A The southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 17, Township 25 North, Range 44 East, W.M., in the City of Spokane Valley, Spokane County, Washington; Excepting therefrom the West 20 feet: Further excepting therefrom the North 15 feet, Further excepting therefrom the South 80 feet for Sprague Avenue_ Spokane Co. parcel no,s 45174.9053, 45174.9054, 45174.9055, and 45174.9056 Frchi Irppravernents CastEstImate Prrx; ®cr ham.: Spekane Cour ty Library - Pro p nee a Main 1.Ibrely Situ Frontage I'm praramants: Herold Rd-; Malo Rus Prepared Ban Prepmllen beth.; Uryan o. Nr'tks. P.E July 10, 2012 EXHIBIT B nItm r� ae LIVVlf odium CV. SPF - WS06TSTO.T -._. ITEstUE13CRiPh4N LIMIT QF MEASURE PLAtINE, QUANTITY EST?MI.T000NIT PACE E$TfSIATEbHTEM PraidE 1 1.00.7 0401 MOBILIZATION L.S. 1 $ 31,500,00 5 ai $00 1-C6.4 7036 ROADWAY SURVEYING LS. 1 $ 150400 5 1 600 1-07.; 8 7739 SPCC PLAN LS. 1 $ 500.00 5 500 9 10 1-10.3 2-01 0038 PROJECT TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL LS. $ 4.000.00 3 4, 000 CLEARING AND G RU68I 1G L.S. $ 4 000.00 S 4 RIO 12 2-02 2314 EAWCUT ASFHALr PRVCMOIT ROADWAY EXCAVATION & EMBANKMENT. INCL. FIAUL 1,000 735 111.111rfil f§ 1.60 $ 16.00 $ .10,00 S 1,250 5 11 603 14 2.03 17 4-01 6115 CRUSHED SURFACING TCP COURSE 15 5-04 HMA GL 1!2' 0,25 FT_ aEPTI-L PG 64-28 S.Y. S.Y. 872 $ 24.00 5 20.00 8 2,450 3 17 440 20 5.21 Pritd. Cr_ 1!2•; 0.33 FT. nEPTH. PG 84-26 . 26 7-25 1992 PRECAST CONCRETE iORYW=LL TYPE 5 - SNIALE EACH L. S. C.Y. 3 1 380 $ 3400.00 $ 1 500.00 $ 23.00 $ 10 2W 1. 1 500 3 0740 a4 5-21 TEMP07#tA11Y ERO310N & SEDIM5NT CONTROL sWALEEXCAVAMI0N INC. HAUL 35 3.72 6 342 6405 TOPSOIL TYPE C.Y. 150 $ 03.00 4 030 59 802 9555 54D INSTALLATION $,Y. 1,381 $ 6.00 $ 14,$873 40 8.43 $071 IRRIGATION SYSTEM L. S. 1 $ 7,500.00 3 7 509 a 2 0-04 0700 CEM ENTC 0 IC, TRAFFIC CURE &GUTTER LF. 1,225 $ 19.00 $ 15925 43 44 13.64 5707 GEMENT COIC. PEIJS5TIOAN CURB , . _ LF. $-y- 80 20 tag $ 10.00 $ 5400 3 44.00 5 1.440 3 14023 $ 0,104 8.44 1070 CEMENT CO!dC.117LARRY SPA_LL_SPILLWAY .1$ 47 8.03 8-14 7969 7055 CEMEI{TCONGRTE DRIVEWAYAPPtt0ACI-1 CEMENTC'JNCR.ETE SIDEWALK - 727 4 $ 34.00 3 1 60.00 5 24 716 5 6 O 4B s-14 7058 OrEMENTCONGRETECURB RAMP TYPE A 61 8-2.0 $912 HAWK PDE3TRIAN SIGNAL 1 $ 200,010 00 5 2.00,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE Contingency (25,51 Ind.allen AO ustrnKnl Feel4r 4 Can>SIIYd1lun 5 ub•Tptat PE (i5}C. CE{11 L1t110 Allovionca - UndorgraunUln® DT aro/toad I Ines {East aide er Heratll Right Or fay ars TOTAL PROJECT ESTIMATE S 90,461 $ 31 6.09 $ '523,035 $ 7r3,67b $ 76,670 $ 24,000 $ 700,069 Coat Estimate Abs umptla n a: includes pawer ientwidon'n8. sidew.11k. totb $ gutter erd swains for frontage Oi un0BVaIopcd perms dIcr9 Herald Rd end blain Ave. Estimate dc4s not Include Irar.tase IrIpliverocrts In kora or existing Berea Park on Ma I.7 Ava or Bairaur Rd. Includ$u l -IP. fl+K Pede3Snan CroesIng Signal an SpdeguE Ave. MOOR AW • fHerald Rd. t7 Fens Rt LvCed &den Stro l_ = 656-tt 3" HMA ever 6' CSTC; E. Mot: 34•R Wide; N6 eddlklelel widen IN req'd f0-il swain; 84t a itlewalk, nlemkt_litromo Ave, to Man Avo, l Ccllecier WW1 1, ° 67 4"1-14A, ever 6' CSTC; F x 'Men 26 b 30 -ft 4111don to 40 -It 10•Rswale; 0.1 sidewalk CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: December 29, 2015 Item: Check all that apply: ❑ Consent ❑ Information Department Director Approval: ❑ Old business ❑ New business ❑ Public Hearing ® Admin. Report ❑ Pending Legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: Historic Preservation Program Implementation Plan GOVERNING LEGISLATION: The Growth Management Act (GMA) RCW 36.70A.020 PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: On August 19, 2014, staff presented a brief overview of local historic preservation and special evaluations to City Council. On October 14, 2014, the City of Spokane's Historic Preservation Officer and the Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer provided more information relating to the establishment of a local historic preservation program. On February 3, 2015, staff presented an overview of the process for establishing an in-house historic preservation program, responsibilities as a Certified Local Government (CLG) and options to run the historic preservation program. On April 21, 2015, staff presented an overview of the required standards, special tax valuation agreement, and historic register listing implications. On June 30, 2015, staff presented benefits, drawbacks, and estimated costs to run the historic program. Council concurred to move forward with the establishment of the program. On September 15, 2015, staff presented Council with background and draft ordinances required to apply to become a CLG. On December 15, 2015, staff presented the implementation plan for the Historic Preservation Program. At that meeting Council requested the assessed value of known historic assets in the City. BACKGROUND: To become a CLG, the Department of Archeology and Historic Preservation requires the adoption of the Historic Preservation Program (HPP) ordinance and Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) ordinance, development of rules and procedures and establishment of Commission members. To run the HPP, there are additional tasks that staff needs to complete. Staff has prepared a comprehensive implementation plan that consists of nine tasks: Task 1 - Staff Training Task 2 - HPP ordinance and HPC ordinance - Required to become a CLG Task 3 - Rules & Procedures for Commission - Required to become a CLG Task 4 - Amend Fee Schedule Task 5 - Develop Documents Task 6 - Appoint Commission Members - Required to become a CLG Task 7 - Apply to become a CLG Task 8 - Commission Training Task 9 - Commission Meetings These tasks are described in detail in the attached memorandum (Exhibit 1). Page 1 of 2 The HPP will allow the City to receive technical assistance, apply for special grant funding, offer special tax valuation to local registered properties, and comment on federal and state historic preservation actions. OPTIONS: Council discretion RECOMMENDED ACTION OR MOTION: Discussion only. BUDGET/FINANCIAL IM PACTS: Unknown at present. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Community Economic Development Director and Gloria Mantz, Development Engineer Attachments: • Exhibit 1 — Memorandum to Mike Jackson, City Manager • Exhibit 2 — Historic Assets Assessed Value Table • Exhibit 3 — Historic Assets Map Page 2of2 Spiik w� jVaueY Community E Economic Development 11707 E Sprague Ave, Suite 106 • Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.720.5240 • Fax: 509.921.1008 • planning@spokanevalley.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager From: John Hohman, Community & Economic Development Director Date: December 7, 2015 Re: Historic Preservation Program (HPP) Implementation Plan This memorandum presents an implementation plan to establish a Historic Preservation Program for the City and become a Certified Local Government (CLG). The required tasks are: Task 1 - Staff Training Task 2 - Historic Preservation Program (HPP) ordinance and Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) ordinance - Required to become a CLG Task 3 - Rules & Procedures for Commission - Required to become a CLG Task 4 - Amend Fee Schedule Task 5 - Developing Documents Task 6 - Appoint Commission Members - Required to become a CLG Task 7 - Apply to become a CLG Task 8 - Commission Training Task 9 - Commission Meetings Table 1: Implementation Schedule Task Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Month 10 Month 11 Month 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Table 1 shows the tentative implementation schedule. Staff will receive training (task 1) throughout the implementation period. Tasks 2, 3, and 4 require various City Council actions and will be processed concurrently. Staff will develop the documents in task 5 behind the Memorandum of Historic Preservation Program (HPP) Implementation Plan Page 1of4 scenes of the formal processes to be available when City becomes a CLG. After the HPC is adopted, Commission members will be selected and appointed (task 6) and the City is eligible to apply to become a CLG (task 7). Commission training and meetings (tasks 8 and 9) will start after becoming a CLG. Each task is described in detail below. Task 1 - Staff Training In order to administer the HPP, staff needs to be trained. Training is not mandatory for staff or Commission, but highly recommended to have a good foundation for the HPP. Washington State Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (DAHP) offers training resources by phone and online. Based on budget allowances, DAPH may be able to also come to the City to train staff and/or the Commission. Once authorized to proceed, staff will begin training using the resources offered by DAHP. Staff will also attend training in Tacoma and Spokane, WA. Training is expected to occur throughout the first year of the program. Task 2 - HPP and HPC ordinances The HPP ordinance will populated Chapter 19.100 of the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (SVMC). The HPP ordinance establishes: • The Spokane Valley Register (Register); • The process for designating properties to be included in or removed from the Register; • The process for altering or demolishing Registered properties; and • The criteria and requirements to qualify for special tax valuation. The HPC will create Chapter 18.60 of the SVMC. The HPC ordinance establishes: • The qualification of the commission members, how they will be appointed and selected, the number of members and terms; • How meetings will be conducted and their frequency; and • The duties and responsibilities of the commission. Staff has prepared a draft HPP and HPC ordinances that have been reviewed by City legal staff and also by DAHP. Staff needs to conduct an environmental review which is expected to take six weeks. To begin the adoption process, staff needs to send notice of public hearing to staff/agencies, publish it in the newspaper and post it on the City's website. Adoption then follows the City's typical process that requires a minimum of three touches with the Planning Commission and three touches with City Council. Additional meetings with Planning Commission and City Council may be necessary depending on comments received from the public and/or deliberations by Planning Commission or City Council. The adoption process is expected to take at least four months. Memorandum of Historic Preservation Program (HPP) Implementation Plan Page 2 of 4 Staff will take both the HPP and the HPC ordinances through the adoption process at the same time. Task 3 - Rules & Procedures for Commission The rules and procedures are established to direct the Commission on how to execute duties and functions established in the HPC ordinance. Staff will prepare a draft of the rules and procedures and present an overview of the proposed resolution in an administrative report to City Council. Additional meetings may be necessary if Council desires additional discussion of the proposed rules and procedures. To adopt the resolution, a second Council meeting is required. Administrative report and consent reports for this task will be scheduled concurrently with the Council meetings for the HPP and HPC ordinances. Task 4 - Amend Fee Schedule Staff will analyze necessary fees as part of the application process to nominate historic properties, review fees for certificate of appropriateness and waivers, and special tax valuation. Staff will present to City Council an overview of the proposed resolution to amend the fee schedule to include fees for historic preservation in an administrative report. To adopt the resolution, a second Council meeting is required. Administrative report and consent reports for this task will be scheduled concurrently with the Council meetings for the HPP and HPC ordinances. Task 5 — Developing Documents Staff will develop and consult with DAHP for all necessary applications and forms. An internal audit for content and accuracy will be conducted before finalizing the documents. The City will make the documents available following the approval to become a CLG. The documents will then be available on the City's website, City Hall and at the Spokane Valley Heritage Museum. Additional locations of relevance may be added to the list. Task 6 - Appoint Commission Members The City will solicit applications in the Valley News Herald, Spokesman Review, post notice on City's website and issue a media release. The applications will be forwarded to City Council for a Mayoral nomination and Council consensus of five commission members. This process takes approximately four to six weeks. This task will begin after the HPC ordinance is adopted. Memorandum of Historic Preservation Program (HPP) Implementation Plan Page 3 of 4 Task 7 - Apply to become a Certified Local Government (CLG) The City will submit the ordinances, qualifications for appointed Commission members, rules and procedures and lead staff member's resume to DAHP for review. Upon approval, DAHP will submit certification of the agreement for the Mayor's signature. The document will be sent to National Parks Service for final approval. Additionally, grants and some DAHP training will be available following the City becoming a CLG. This task will begin after the commission members are appointed. Task 8 - Commission Training Training opportunities upon becoming a CLG have been separated as there is a responsibility on staff to attend and coordinate training for the Commission. Additionally, DAHP customarily does an introductory training for staff and Commission. Staff has the opportunity to apply for grants to compensate for training costs. This task will start after the commission members are appointed. The first training, open government training, will be provided by our legal staff at the first Commission meeting. Additional training will be provided using the resources provided by DAHP. Task 9 - Commission Meetings Applications for properties to be included in the Register may be accepted following the approval of becoming a CLG. Staff provides administrative and professional assistance to the Commission. The HPC ordinance establishes the time, place and frequency of meetings with a minimum of four per year and the duties and responsibilities of the Commission. The rules and procedures (task 3) direct the Commission on how to execute the duties and responsibilities established in the ordinances. Commission meetings will take place after the City becomes a CLG and a Commission has been appointed. It is anticipated that for the first quarter of the project, the Commission will meet monthly to receive training. Once training is completed, the Commission will meet per the HPC ordinance which is anticipated to be at least four times per year. Implementation Timeline Implementation of the HPP is estimated to be completed in 12 months. Within the year the City will be able to hold Commission meetings and conduct training to be ready to serve the community by accepting applications from interested property owners. Memorandum of Historic Preservation Program (HPP) Implementation Plan Page 4 of 4 Exhibit 2: Historic Assets Assessed Value Site ID Type/ Name Parcel Site Address Assessment Residential Property Type 1 Residential 55181.3822 1302 N LONG RD $140,700 2 Residential 55074.1245 18000 E INDIANA AVE $130,250 3 Residential 55074.1576 18303 E MISSION AVE $127,180 4 Residential 45222.0656 12503 E 4TH AVE $211,500 5 Residential 45164.0230 11703 E VALLEY WAY $107,450 6 Residential 45211.0702 11606 E SPRAGUE AVE $589,660 7 Residential 45134.0901 323 N FLORA RD $222,010 8 Residential 45134.1902 601 N FLORA RD $114,350 9 Residential 55182.0504 17422 E MISSION AVE $146,470 10 Residential 45161.1127 11813 E BROADWAY AVE $233,640 11 Residential 45161.0738 11822 E BOONE AVE $143,100 12 Residential 45161.2402 11907 E BROADWAY AVE $208,620 13 Residential 45161.2402 11907 E BROADWAY AVE $208,620 14 Residential 45032.9018 13005 E TRENT AVE $166,300 15 Residential 46344.0832 13409 E WELLESLEY AVE $182,010 16 Residential 45221.9009 13516 E SPRAGUE AVE $706,670 17 Residential 45143.1649 14201 E VALLEYWAY AVE $177,750 18 Residential 45144.0846 14703 E VALLEYWAY AVE $254,300 19 Residential 45133.0629 15703 E VALLEY WAY $139,200 20 Residential 45134.0519 16303 E VALLEYWAY AVE $114,120 21 Residential 45134.1227 16316 E VALLEYWAY AVE $168,820 22 Residential 55182.3401 17322 E MISSION AVE $102,300 23 Residential 55183.0410 17520 E ALKI AVE $112,100 24 Residential 45154.2109 304 N MCDONALD RD $162,100 25 Residential 55063.0103 3504 N FLORA RD $265,760 26 Residential 45144.0957 405 N PROGRESS RD $144,200 27 Residential 55183.0339 408 N FLORA RD $129,400 28 Residential 45031.0410 4215 N EVERGREEN RD $117,900 29 Residential 35241.3608 516 S PARK RD $82,680 30 Residential 55183.0333 530 N FLORA RD $112,700 31 Residential 45162.0911 1105 N BOWDISH RD $214,200 32 Residential 45022.4603 13914 E ROCKWELL AVE $81,400 1 Exhibit 2: Historic Assets Assessed Value Site ID Type/ Name Parcel Site Address Assessment 33 Residential 55063.0103 3504 N FLORA RD $265,760 34 Residential 55183.0339 408 N FLORA RD $129,400 35 Residential 46344.1301 13519 E WELLESLEY AVE $168,050 36 Residential 45144.1022 15103 E VALLEYWAY AVE $156,500 37 Residential 45131.0213 1123 N FLORA RD $162,460 38 Residential 45031.0601 4719 N EVERGREEN RD $163,300 39 Residential 45171.0719 1312 N WOODRUFF RD $189,180 40 Residential 45163.0449 322 N UNIVERSITY RD $263,400 41 Residential 45173.0409 9304 E BROADWAY AVE $149,420 42 Residential 45173.1315 9222 E VALLEYWAY AVE $593,980 43 Residential 45222.0539 205 S PINES Rd $144,530 44 Residential 45214.9141 11510 E 8TH AVE $131,100 45 Residential 45222.3804 12915 E 4TH AVE $96,300 46 Residential 45334.9192 4220 S HATHERLY CIR $134,020 47 Residential 45172.1226 9219 E BROADWAY AVE $160,100 48 Residential 45181.1611 8309 E BROADWAY AVE $163,810 49 Residential 45074.9085 2322 N VISTA RD $179,390 50 Residential 45142.9235 14623 E BROADWAY AVE $184,310 51 Residential 45144.0945 505 N PROGRESS RD $225,280 52 Residential 45133.1012 15922 E VALLEYWAY AVE $147,320 53 Residential 45133.0112 723 N CONKLIN RD $80,020 54 Residential 45134.0215 16806 E BROADWAY AVE $149,000 55 Residential 46344.0913 13121 E WELLESLEY AVE $169,960 56 Residential 45242.0435 15624 E SPRAGUE AVE $694,570 57 Residential 45241.9002 102 S FLORA RD $701,220 58 Residential 45241.9144 324 S STEEN RD $122,200 59 Residential 55192.0303 17508 E SPRAGUE AVE $100,600 60 Residential 45222.0445 33 S PINES RD $217,700 61 Residential 35242.9020 6406 E 4TH AVE $150,000 62 Residential 35242.9075 6322 E 4TH AVE $106,000 Residentail Sub -total $12,316,340 2 Exhibit 2: Historic Assets Assessed Value Site ID Type/ Name Parcel Site Address Assessment Commercial Property Type 63 Peter's Hardware 45211.0108 12118 E SPRAGUE AVE $190,300 64 Edgecliff 45192.9167 601 S PARK RD $3,966,600 65 Edgecliff 45192.9166 511 S PARK RD $5,012,810 66 Orcard Avenue Pump House(Cobblestone) 35121.4303 7415 E MARIETTA AVE $60,040 67 Opportunity Town Hall Site 45211.0118 12114 E SPRAGUE AVE $273,500 68 East Spokane Township Hall 35132.0922 5916 E SHARP AVE $238,590 Commercial Sub -total $9,741,840 Other Property Type 69 Not Known 45221.9163 718 S EVERGREEN RD $158,800 70 Pines 45281.9005 12116 E 16TH AVE $100 71 Chester Cemetary 45334.9089 0 VACANT LAND $145,270 72 Not Known 45173.0623 404 N ARGONNE RD $870,100 73 Greenacres Christian 55181.2015 18000 E MISSION AVE $207,600 74 Opportunity Christian Church 45211.0220 16 S ROBIE RD $327,480 75 Orchard Avenue Community Center 45072.1804 2810 N PARK RD $263,540 76 Mullan Road Marker 45192.9180 7512 E SPRAGUE AVE $0 77 Mullan Road Marker 35241.3215 716 S COLEMAN RD $0 78 Mullan Road Marker NA $0 79 Orchard Avenue School 45072.0502 7519 E BUCKEYE AVE $4,832,260 Other Sub -total $6,805,150 Grand Total 3 $28,863,330 Euclid Ave O' AveBuckeye A -� fission A a♦ t; �QA _ ellesley Ave ery Dr ontgomery Ave Knox Ave Mirabeau Pkwy Mansfield Ave Mansfield Ave 0 Euclid Ave Euclid Ave Euclid Ave SR 90 eb%SR;90 wb Mission Ave Appleway Blvd 5 44th Ave rG' Exhibit 3: Historic Assets Provided by Spokane Valley Heritage Museum Legend A Historic Assets City of Spokane Valley Boundary Urban Growth Area Water Bodies Date: 12/18/15 b Map Location 2 Miles Notice: The information shown on this map is compiled from various sources and is subject to constant revision. The City makes no claims or guarantees about the accuracy or currency of this may and expressly disclaims liability for errors and omissions in its' contents. To confirm accuracy contact the City of Spokane Palley, Community Development Department, Division of Planning, (509) 921-1000. Product of the city of Spokane valley, community Development Department CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY Request for Council Action Meeting Date: 12-29-15 Department Director Approval Check all that apply: ❑ consent ❑ old business ❑ new business ❑ public hearing ❑ information ® admin. report ❑ pending legislation AGENDA ITEM TITLE: City Hall Update GOVERNING LEGISLATION: PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION TAKEN: Multiple meetings, Council retreat 02-17-15; Administrative Report 03-17-15, Motion Consideration 03-24-15, Study Session 09-15-15, Motion Consideration 09-29-15, Interior Discussion 11-18-15, Heating and Cooling Discussions on 12-1-15 and 12-15-15. BACKGROUND: Developing options for a permanent City Hall building has been a Council budget goal for the past several years. Earlier this year, the City closed on 3.38 acres of property at the former University City Mall site. At the February 17, 2015 Council workshop, staff discussed the selection process for architectural firms to design the building. At the March 17, 2015 Council meeting staff updated the Council on the selected design firm and discussed the draft professional services agreement for the project. At the March 24, 2015 meeting, the Council authorized the City Manager to contract with Architects West to design the site and building. The architect team conducted a public meeting on May 6, 2015 and met with councilmembers and staff to finalize the program and discuss design parameters for the building. The project team updated the Council on the design process and displayed two potential concepts on September 15, 2015. Council indicated a preference for one of the concepts which was approved on September 29, 2015. Interior color and material options were discussed on November 18, 2015 and a general heating and cooling discussion was held on December 1, 2015. The discussion tonight will update Council on the status of the design. OPTIONS: Discussion RECOMMENDED MOTION: BUDGET/FINANCIAL IMPACTS: The City Hall construction project is anticipated to cost $14.4 million including land acquisition, design services, and construction. STAFF CONTACT: John Hohman, Community and Economic Development Director ATTACHMENTS: 1 of 1 To: From: Re: DRAFT ADVANCE AGENDA as of December 23, 2015; 10:30 a.m. Please note this is a work in progress; items are tentative Council & Staff City Clerk, by direction of City Manager Draft Schedule for Upcoming Council Meetings Jan 5, 2016, Formal Meeting Format 6:00 p.m. [due Mon, Dec 28] [Note: Oath of Office will be administered 5:45 p.m. This does not constitute a separate meeting.] (Councilmember Gothmann to attend meeting via phone) 1. Council Officer Elections for Mayor and Deputy Mayor — Chris Bainbridge 2. PUBLIC HEARING: Mining Moratorium Renewal — Erik Lamb 3. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 4. Admin Report: Advance Agenda — Mayor (15 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 minutes] January 12, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Mayoral Appointments: Planning Commissioners — Mayor 3. Mayoral Appointments: Councilmembers to various Committees/Boards — Mayor 4. Admin Report: Street Vacation, 3rd Avenue — Karen Kendall 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda January 19, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Pavement Preservation Plan Update — Eric Guth 2. City Hall Update — John Hohman 3. Council Training- Open Public Meeting Act, Public Record Act - 4. Advance Agenda January 26, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. First Reading Ordinance Vacating 3rd Avenue — Karen Kendall 3. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 4. Info Only: (a) Dept. Reports; (b) Amended 2016 TIP February 2, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Amended 2016 TIP — Steve Worley 2. City Hall Update — John Hohman 3. Advance Agenda February 9, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Amended 2016 TIP — Steve Worley 2. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 3. Second Reading Ordinance Vacating 3rd Avenue — Karen Kendall 4. Proposed Resolution Amending 2016 TIP — Steve Worley 5. Admin Report: Advance Agenda February 16, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. City Hall Update — John Hohman 2. Advance Agenda Draft Advance Agenda 12/23/2015 11:19:24 AM [due Mon, Jan 4] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (10 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 50 minutes] [due Mon, Jan 11] (20 minutes) (15 minutes) (20 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: 60 minutes] Cary Driskell, Erik Lamb [due Mon, Jan 18] (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] [due Mon, Jan 25] (10 minutes) (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Feb 1] (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (10 minutes) (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [*estimated meeting: minutes] [due Mon, Feb 8] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) Page 1 of 2 February 23, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 3. Info Only: Department Reports March 1, 2016, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. City Hall Update — John Hohman 2. Advance Agenda March 8, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda [due Mon, Feb 15] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Feb 22] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Feb 29] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) March 15, 2016, Workshop, 8:30 a.m. - 3:30 p.m. (no evening meeting) [due Mon, Mar 7] City Hall Council Chambers March 22, 2016, Formal Meeting Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. Consent Agenda (claims, payroll, minutes) 2. Admin Report: Advance Agenda 3. Info Only: Department Reports March 29, 2015, Study Session Format, 6:00 p.m. 1. City Hall Update — John Hohman 2. Advance Agenda *time for public or Council comments not included OTHER PENDING AND/OR UPCOMING ISSUES/MEETINGS: Avista Electrical Franchise Blake Street Sidewalk Coal/Oil Trains (Environ Impact Statement, etc.) Lodging Tax Committee Appointments (late Feb) Ordinance 15-023 (expires June 9 2016) Sidewalks and Development SRTMC Agreement (June/July 2016) Uncovered/unsecured loads [due Mon, Mar 14] (5 minutes) (5 minutes) [due Mon, Mar 21] (15 minutes) (5 minutes) Draft Advance Agenda 12/23/2015 11:19:24 AM Page 2 of 2 Spokane ..+ric Valley City of Spokane Valley Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Page Title 1 Cover Sheet 2 Pre -Application Meetings Requested 3 Online Applications Received 4 Construction Applications Received 5 Land Use Applications Received 6 Construction Permits Issued 7 Land Use Applications Approved 8 Development Inspections Performed 9 Code Enforcement 10 Revenue 11 Building Permit Valuations Printed 12/01/2015 07:46 Page 1 of 11 Spokane .000 Valley Pre -Application Meetings Requested Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 A Pre -Application Meeting is a service provided to help our customers identify the code requirements related to their project proposal. Community Development scheduled a total of 7 Pre -Application Meetings in November 2015. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial Pre -App Land Use Pre -Application Commercial Pre -App Meeting Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Land Use Pre -Application Meeting Monthly Totals 10 11 14 9 8 13 9 10 5 10 7 0 Annual Total To -Date: 106 Printed 12/01/2015 07:46 Page 2 of 11 Spokane �.� Valley Online Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Community Development received a total of 232 Online Applications in November 2015. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Trade Permit Sign Permit Right of Way Permit Reroof Permit Pre -Application Meeting Request Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Approach Permit Approach Permit Demolition Permit Other Online Applications Pre -Application Meeting Request Reroof Permit Right of Way Permit Sign Permit Trade Permit Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: Printed 12/01/2015 07:46 4,732 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 7 8 7 14 19 7 13 10 15 1 4 6 3 2 6 5 6 1 124 110 216 170 168 147 181 178 200 165 24 20 16 15 17 23 13 26 9 15 13 14 39 69 31 39 33 41 37 30 42 54 45 81 79 107 86 68 56 72 11 5 4 10 13 15 3 15 12 17 3 0 98 75 109 100 153 167 174 171 152 168 98 0 12 2 3 5 0 68 0 12 0 15 0 35 0 0 320 290 442 462 482 511 508 515 482 482 238 0 Page 3 of 11 Spokan' ems``` 41111.y Construction Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Community Development received a total of 293 Construction Applications in November 2015. 600 400 200 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New ELII Commercial - TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits *3 3 *51 2 *3 *2 *18 *9 *4 *14 *11 *24 *14 *12 *7 *11 *16 *8 *8 *8 0 *8 *10 *22 *16 *18 *13 *16 *21 *19 *23 *14 0 *23 *21 *26 *18 *30 *32 *31 *31 *29 *31 *15 0 *86 *83 *144 *119 *122 *132 *143 *138 *121 *129 *117 0 *10 *5 *14 *7 *13 *19 *20 *11 *16 *16 *10 0 *1 *4 *7 *4 *2 *6 *5 *6 *1 *3 *6 0 *11 *9 *11 *13 *13 *15 *3 *15 *12 *17 *4 0 *97 *130 *168 *266 *196 *200 *187 *169 *182 *174 *114 0 *7 *5 0 Monthly Totals 253 276 467 459 409 426 434 416 392 408 293 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 12/01/2015 07:47 4,233 Page 4 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. Spokane ....IF Valley Land Use Applications Received Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Community Development received a total of 41 Land Use Applications in November 2015. 100 50 11 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec IS' Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec *1 *5 *3 *7 *2 *1 *4 0 *3 *1 *3 0 0 0 *2 *1 *3 *3 0 *3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *1 0 0 0 0 *1 0 0 0 0 *1 0 *1 *2 *1 *2 0 *3 *4 *1 *1 0 0 0 0 *1 0 0 0 *1 0 *1 0 0 *1 *2 *1 0 *1 0 *2 0 0 0 1 0 *1 0 *2 *1 0 *2 *1 *1 *2 *1 0 0 *50 *51 *80 *48 *35 *39 *41 *53 *55 *42 *36 0 Monthly Totals 54 58 90 60 42 47 49 62 64 46 41 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 12/01/2015 07:47 613 Page 5 of 11 *Includes Online Applications. Spokane 4,00.0 Valley Construction Permits Issued Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Community Development issued a total of 266 Construction Permits in November 2015. Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Commercial - New Commercial - New Commercial - TI Residential - New Commercial - Trade Residential - Trade Residential - Accessory Demolition Sign Other Construction Permits M Commercial - TI Residential - New ® Other Construction Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2 3 22 33 2 1 4 4 1 12 12 23 14 9 10 11 18 12 7 11 0 6 14 13 22 11 21 10 16 15 26 15 0 24 20 23 19 26 32 27 35 27 29 15 0 80 92 120 133 107 138 131 114 112 147 111 0 10 5 14 6 12 18 19 10 12 18 9 0 0 4 7 4 2 5 6 6 1 3 6 0 11 9 11 11 13 13 6 14 10 11 7 0 13 4 0 68 99 127 159 194 161 148 149 129 131 88 0 onthly Totals 213 258 360 401 376 399 362 366 319 385 266 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 12/01/2015 07:48 3,705 Page 6 of 11 Spokane ....IF Valley Land Use Applications Approved Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Community Development approved a total of 40 Land Use Applications in November 2015. 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec IS' Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Boundary Line Adjustment Short Plat Preliminary Long Plat Preliminary Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Binding Site Plan Preliminary Final Platting Zoning Map/Comp Plan Amendment State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) Administrative Exception/Interpretation Other Land Use Permits Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 0 1 1 2 3 1 1 0 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 39 52 51 41 39 32 38 50 55 42 38 0 Monthly Totals 44 52 56 44 42 38 41 55 57 48 40 0 Annual Total To -Date: Printed 12/01/2015 07:48 517 Page 7 of 11 Spokane Valley. Development Inspections Performed Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Community Development performed a total of 909 Development Inspections in November 2015. Development Inspections include building, planning, engineering and ROW inspections. 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0— 2013 2014. , 2015 2015 2014 2013 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Totals 801 975 1,063 1,242 1,420 1,756 1,625 1,146 1,051 1,059 909 0 601 633 996 1,281 1,321 1,295 1,413 1,225 1,310 1,481 973 1,027 13,556 465 502 808 1,026 1,060 1,015 1,084 1,078 1,186 1,016 833 673 10,71 e Printed 12/01/2015 07:49 Page 8 of 11 Spokane ,osic Valley Code Enforcement Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Code Enforcement Officers responded to 28 citizen requests in the month of November. They are listed by type below. Please remember that all complaints, even those that have no violation, must be investigated. 80 60 40 20 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental f General Nuisance Property Complaint, Non -Violation Environmental General Nuisance Property Monthly Totals Annual Total To -Date: 366 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 0 0 0 0 3 1 10 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 26 22 23 32 17 43 18 7 17 0 0 0 0 0 10 7 5 12 11 23 12 18 10 1 11 0 23 26 32 35 36 57 30 62 29 8 28 0 Printed 12/01/2015 07:49 Page 9 of 11 Spokane .� Valley Revenue 2015 Trend 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Community Development Revenue totaled $97,525 in November 2015. 300,000 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2015 2014 Five -Year Trend Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1 Nov Dec Totals $74,775 $108,328 $161,174 $187,199 $123,918 $117,453 $162,551 $162,864 $99,587 $181,791 $97,525 $0 N1,477,165 $79,763 $67,972 $133,730 $131,195 $224,961 $199,161 $138,904 $100,987 $134,164 $109,327 $91,979 $67,777 $1,479,920 $74,628 $66,134 $198,571 $160,508 $282,086 $152,637 $117,776 $127,540 $153,838 $149,197 $84,442 $97,689 $1,665,046 $158,912 $51,536 $102,538 $106,496 $184,176 $409,592 $277,553 $102,021 $129,174 $133,561 $98,386 $66,559 $1,820,504 $34,204 $60,319 $177,737 $173,932 $268,672 $223,888 $123,137 $103,703 $113,731 $112,542 $108,948 $51,745 $1,552,558 $43,842 $77,247 $80,774 $118,237 $84,684 $106,909 $88,247 $83,949 $167,076 $78,237 $95,172 $58,881 11,083,255 $87,229 $84,626 $109,029 $96,800 $305,185 $102,781 $87,805 $87,724 $107,002 $73,100 $72,948 $64,009 e,278,238 Printed 12/01/2015 07:49 Page 10 of 11 Spokane .Valley Building Permit Valuation 2015 Trend 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 Community Development Monthly Report 01/01/2015 - 11/30/2015 Community Development Building Permit Valuation totaled $5,863,460 in November 2015. 35,000,000 30, 000, 000 25, 000, 000 20, 000, 000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -41- 2015 2014 Five -Year Trend Jan $2.93M $7.58M $3.18M $25.49M $0.72M $1.46M $7.06M Feb Mar $10.71M $3.92M $2.45M $1.92M $2.95M $5.95M $6.34M $8.07M $6.13M $9.90M $3.59M $5.29M $5.03M $6.82M Apr $18.60M $6.87M $8.92M $7.30M $5.32M $6.15M $6.64M May $6.73M $23.25M $34.58M $22.22M $24.39M $2.53M $32.55M Jun $7.53M $18.45M $7.44M $41.88M $33.08M $4.98M $4.86M Jul Aug $5.05M $11.28M $6.37M $32.91M $7.91M $3.83M $5.36M Printed 12/01/2015 07:49 Page 11 of 11 $8.06M $6.65M $9.47M $6.52M $9.89M $3.45M $3.91M Sep $5.15M $10.77M $12.01M $8.11M $6.47M $21.54M $5.71M Oct $14.42M $7.64M $7.74M $14.22M $8.78M $4.46M $3.01M Nov Dec $5.86M $4.10M $3.60M $7.25M $3.76M $3.97M $1.93M $0.00M $2.93M $6.30M $2.54M $1.66M $1.85M $2.29M Totals $93.11M 1$109.56M 111.96M 1$173.95M 'po ane Va.11ey 11707 E Sprague Ave Suite 106 1 Spokane Valley WA 99206 509.921.1000 1 Fax: 509.921.1008 1 citvhall®spokanevallev.org Memorandum To: Mike Jackson, City Manager From: Chelsie Taylor, Finance Director -'C Date: December 10, 2015 Re Finance Department Activity Report — November 2015 Following is information pertaining to Finance Department activities through the end of November 2015 and included herein is a 2015 Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures through the end of November. 2016 Budget Development Process The 2016 Budget development process began in the Finance Department in early March and all departments have completed detailed budget requests. By the time the budget is adopted on October 27th the Council will have had an opportunity to discuss the budget on seven occasions including two public hearings. • June 16 Council budget workshop • August 11 Admin report on 2016 revenues and expenditures • August 25 Public hearing #1 on 2016 revenues and expenditures • September 8 City Manager's presentation of preliminary 2016 Budget • September 22 Public hearing #2 on 2016 Budget • October 13 First reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 2016 Budget • November 10 Second reading on proposed ordinance adopting the 201E Budget Lodging Tax The schedule leading to awarding funds is as follows: • September 2 - Letters mailed to agencies that have historically received funding, media release to City website and notice to newspapers. • October 2 - Grant applications due at City Hall. • October 13 - Grant applicant presentations to lodging tax advisory committee. • November 10 - Admin report to Council on results of lodging tax advisory committee meeting. • December 8 - City Council motion consideration: Award lodging tax for 2016. Fee Resolution As a part of preparing the annual budget, City Departments are asked to review the Master Fee Schedule that is currently in place and determine whether changes in fees charged and!or language used in the governing resolution should be altered. This leads to an annual update to the fee resolution that sets fees for the following year. The calendar leading to the adoption of the resolution setting 2016 fees is as follows: P:lFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.docx Page 1 • December 1 — Admin report on proposed changes to the fee resolution. • December 29 — Council adoption of the fee resolution Budget to Actual Comparison Report A report reflecting 2015 Budget to Actual Revenues and Expenditures for those funds for which a 2015 Budget was adopted is located on pages 5 through 18. Because we attempt to provide this information in a timely manner this report is prepared from records that are not formally closed by the Finance Department at month end or reconciled to bank records. Although it is realistic to expect the figures will change over subsequent weeks, I believe the report is materially accurate. We've included the following information in the report: • Revenues by source for all funds, and expenditures by department in the General Fund and by type in all other funds. • A breakdown between recurring and nonrecurring revenues and expenditures in the General Fund, Street O&M Fund and Stormwater Fund. • The change in fund balance including beginning and ending figures. The beginning fund balance figures are those that were reflected in our 2014 Annual Financial Report. • Columns of information include: ❑ The 2015 Budget as adopted. o November 2015 activity. a Cumulative 2015 activity through November 2015. o Budget remaining in terms of dollars. o The percent of budgeted revenue collected or budgeted expenditures disbursed. A few points related to the General Fund #001 (page 5): Recurring revenues collections are currently at 88.59% of the amount budgeted with 91 7% of the year elapsed. This is typical and reflective of the nature of the timing of when revenues are collected. • Property tax are paid to Spokane County in two installments each year on April 30 and October 31 and are then remitted to the City primarily in May and November with lesser amounts typically remitted in June and December. Property taxes received thus far in 2015 are $1C,520,118 or 93.29% of the amount budgeted. • Sales tax collections represent only 10 -months of collections thus far because taxes collected in November are not remitted to the City by the State until the latter part of December. Collections are currently $15,280,040 or 86.68% of the amount budgeted. • Gambling taxes are at $331,640 or 74.38% of the amount budgeted. Gambling taxes are paid quarterly with third quarter payments due by October 31. Effective July 1, 2015, the gambling tax rate on card games was reduced from 10% to 6%. • Franchise Fee and Business Registration revenues are typically received in the month following a calendar year quarter. So far in 2015 we have received $912,467 or 79.62% of the amount budgeted. • State shared revenues are composed of State of Washington distributions that include items such as liquor board profits, liquor excise tax, streamlined sales tax mitigation and criminal justice monies. Most of these revenues are paid by the State in the month following a calendar quarter. Through November we've received remittances totaling $1,473,416 or 83.30% of the amount budgeted. • Fines and forfeitures revenues are composed of monthly remittances from Spokane County with payments made in the month following the actual assessment of a fine and false alarm fees. Through November 2015 we've received remittances through the month of October with receipts of $1,144,681 or 75.95% of the amount budgeted. P:IFinancelFinance Activity ReportstCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.docx Page 2 • Community Development service revenues are largely composed of building permit and plan review fees as well as right of way permits. Revenues are currently $1,360,666 or 102.68% of the amount budgeted. • Recreation program fees are composed of revenues generated by the variety of parks and recreation programs including classes, swimming pools (in -season), and CenterPlace. Currently, revenues total $614,468 or 109.04% of the amount budgeted. Recurring expenditures are currently at 85.13% of the amount budgeted with 91.7% of the year elapsed. Departments experience seasonal fluctuations in activity so they don't necessarily expend their budget in twelve equal monthly installments. Investments (page 19) Investments at November 30 total $49,187,772 and are composed of $44,181,764 in the Washington State Local Government investment Pool and $5,003,008 in bank CDs. Total Sales Tax Receipts (page 20) Total sales tax receipts reflect State remittances through October and total $17,263,946 including general, criminal justice and public safety taxes. This figure is $741,020 (4.48%) greater than the same 10 -month period in 2014. Economic Indicators (pages 21 — 23) The following economic indicators provide information pertaining to three different sources of tax revenue that provide a good gauge of the health and direction of the overall economy. 1. Sales taxes (page 21) provide a sense of how much individuals and businesses are spending on the purchase of goods. 2. Hotel / Motel taxes (page 22) provide us with a sense of overnight stays and visits to our area by tourists or business travelers. 3. Real Estate Excise taxes (page 23) provide us with a sense of real estate sales. Page 21 provides a 10 -year history of general sales tax receipts (not including public safety or criminal justice) with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $649,807 or 4.44%. • Tax receipts peaked in 2014 at $17,440,083, besting the previous record year of 2007 when $17,437,467 was collected. In terms of dollars collected this represents an increase of $2,616, but when one considers the increase in the CPI over that seven-year period plus the fact that Spokane Valley now has considerably more businesses, one could reasonably argue that our local economy is still in a recovery mode. Page 22 provides a 10 -year history of hotel/motel tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $20,940 or 4.40%. • Collections reached an all-time high in 2014, exceeding the previous high in 2013 by $30,595 or 5.90%. Page 23 provides a 10 -year history of real estate excise tax receipts with monthly detail beginning January 2006. • Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $566,268 or 44.33%. This increase is unusually high due to a state remittance of real estate excise tax of greater than $100,000 that is included in the April 2015 activity and an unusually high amount received in June 2015 (nearly $350,000 as compared to under $150,000 in the several years prior for that month). P:1FinancelFinance Activity ReportslCounclf Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.docx Page 3 • Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at nearly $2.6 million, decreased precipitously in 2008 and 2009, and are slowly gaining ground. Debt Capacity and Bonds Outstanding (page 24) This page provides information on the City's debt capacity, or the dollar amount of General Obligation (G.O.) Bonds the City may issue, as well as an amortization schedule of the bonds the City currently has outstanding. • The maximum amount of G.Q. bonds the City may issue is determined by the assessed value for property taxes which for 2015 is $7,393,971,582. Following the December 1, 2015, debt service payment the City has $6,375,000 of nonvoted G.O. bonds outstanding which represents 5.75% of our nonvoted bond capacity, and 1.15% of our total debt capacity for all types of bonds. Of this amount: o $5,250,000 remains on bonds issued for the construction of CenterPlace. These bonds are repaid with a portion of the 1/10 of 1% sales tax that is collected by the Spokane Public Facilities District. o $1,125,000 remains on bonds issued for road and street improvements around CenterPlace. The bonds are repaid with a portion of the real estate excise tax collected by the City. Street Fund Revenue Sources (pages 25 and 26) The last two charts reflect a history for the two primary sources of revenue in Street Fund #101. These include: • Page 25 provides a 10 -year history of Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2006. o Compared with calendar year 2014, 2015 collections have increased by $37,378 or 2.38% o Tax receipts peaked in 2007 at just approximately $2.1 million, and subsequently decreased to a range of approximately $1,857,000 to $1,878,000 in the years 2011 through 2014. • Page 26 provides a 6 -year history of Telephone Utility Tax collections with monthly detail beginning January 2009 (the month in which the tax was imposed). a Unlike tax revenues collected by the State and remitted monthly, these taxes are paid to the City directly by the service provider. Consequently there is not a "dean cutoff' in terms of when a vendor pays the tax. Tax revenues currently reported for September include only those that were received through October 31 for September returns and will be adjusted for future collections pertaining to that month. o Tax receipts peaked in 2009 at $3,054,473 and have decreased each year since due to what we suspect is the reduction in land lines by individual households. a The 2015 Budget was adopted with a revenue estimate of $2,565,100. We will watch this closely as we progress through the coming months. P:1FinancelFinance Activity ReportslCouncii Monthly Reportsl201512015 11 30.docx Page 4 P:\FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 #001 - GENERAL FUND RECURRING AG I IVi i Y Budget Year Elapsed 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget November November 30 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Property Tax 11,277,100 4,057,049 10,520.118 (756,982) 93.29% Sales Tax 17,628,400 1,618,821 15,280,040 (2,348,360) 86.68% Sales Tax - Criminal Justice 1,468,700 139,748 1,274,023 (194,677) 86.74°/° Sales Tax - Public Safety 820,106 78,317 709,882 (110,218) 86.56°I° Gambling Tax and Leasehold Excise Tax 445,900 5,632 331,640 (114,260) 74.38% Franchise FeeslBusiness Registration 1.146,000 220,051 912.467 (233,533) 79.62°/° State Shared Revenues 1,768,900 0 1,473,416 (295,484) 83.36930 Fines, Forfeitures and Penalties 1,507,100 95,757 1,144,681 (362,419} 75.95% Community Development 1,325,100 78,616 1,360,666 35,566 102.68% Recreation Program Fees 563,500 32,993 614,46850,968 109.04%Miscellaneous Department Revenue 95,900 8,849 106,818 10,918 111.39°/ Miscellaneous & Investment Interest 131,200 12,003 116,680 (14,520) 88.93% Transfer in #161 (street admin) 39,700 3,3(}8 36,392 (3,308) 91.67% Transfer -in - #105 (Wintax-CPadvertising) 30,000 0 0 (30,000) 0.00% Transfer -in -#402 (storm admin) 13,400 1,117 12,283 (1,117) 91.67% Total Recurring Revenues 38,261,000 6,352,260 33,893,575 (4,367,425) 88.59% Expenditures City Council 513,114 24,281 337,867 175247 65.85% City Manager 688,363 51,802 582,435 105,928 84.61% Legal 461,839 38,004 414,043 47,796 89.65% Public Safety 24,153,492 1,910,449 21,005,631 3,147,861 86.97% Deputy City Manager 691,303 57,572 598,796 92,507 86.62% Finance llT 1,203,879 91,548 970,455 233,424 80.61% Human Resources 243,317 19,726 215,210 28,107 88.45% Public Works 921,914 73,783 674,203 247,711 73.13% Community Development - Administration 261,094 19,755 229,758 31,336 88.00% Community Development - Econ Dev 298,276 16,855 214,651 83,625 71.96% Community Development - Dev Svc 1,424,944 121,246 1,249,047 175,897 87.66% Community Development - Building 1,380,902 94,218 1,087,617 293285 78.76% Parks&Rec- Administration 271,372 19,961 241,184 30,188 88.88% Parks & Rec - Maintenance 844,642 67,626 703,200 141,442 83.25% Parks & Rec - Recreation 226,174 14,837 218,761 7,413 96.72% Parks & Rec- Aquatics 496,200 15,118 483,095 13,105 97.36% Parks & Rec - Senior Center 91,985 6,823 77,604 14,381 84.37% Parks & Rec - CenterPlace 824.997 47,658 724,146 100,851 87.78% Pavement Preservation 920,000 76,667 843,333 76,667 91.67% General Government 1,710,200 65,614 1,119,400 590,800 65.45% Transfers out - #502 (insurance premium) 325,000 27,083 297,917 27,083 91.67% Transfers out - #310 (bond pmt>$434.6 (ease pr 67,600 5,633 61,967 5,633 91.67% Transfers out - #310 (city hallo&m costs) 271,700 22,642 249,058 22,642 91.67% Total Recurring Expenditures 38,292,307 2,888,902 32,599,378 5.692.929 85.13% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures (31,307) 3,463,358 1,294,196 1,325,503 Page 5 F:4Finance\Finance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 #0O1 - GENERAL FUND - continued NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.71 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget November November 30 Remaining % of Budget Revenues Transfers in - #106 (Repymt of Solid Waste) 40,425 40,425 40,425 0 100.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 40,425 40,425 40,425 0 100.00% Expenditures Transfers out - #309 (park grant match) 115,575 8,333 107.242 8,333 92.79% Transfers out - #107 (move PEG cash) 267,300 267,333 267,333 (33) 100.01% General Government - IT capital replacements 120,000 11,844 89,112 30,888 74.26% General Government - City Hall Remodel 23,300 0 12,842 10,458 55.11% City Manager (2 scanners) 3,000 0 3,000 0 100.00% Public Safety (const offices for unit supervisors) 25,000 0 0 25,000 0.00% Community & Econ Dev (comp plan update) 250,000 14,980 204,761 45,239 81.90% Parks & Rec (upgrade dial-up modem at pools) '10,000 0 1,955 8.045 19.55% Parks & Rec (replace CP lounge carpet) 8,000 0 0 8,000 0.00% Parks & Rec (CenterPlace 10yranniversary) 7,400 59 7,938 (538) 107.28% Parks & Rec (CenterPlace Roof Repairs) 36,000 8,435 11,371 24,629 31.59% Police Department - CAD/RMS 309,700 210,343 210,343 99.357 67.92% Police Department - (gate motor replace) 4,300 0 4,253 47 98.90% Police Department - (radar recorder) 4,600 0 4,600 0 100.00% Transfers out - #312 ('13 fund bal >50%) 1.783,512 1,783,512 1,783,512 0 100.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 2,967,687 2,304,840 2,708,262 259,425 91.26% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurrinc Expenditures (2,927,262) (2,264,415) (2,667,837) 259,425 Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (2,958,569) 1,198,943 (1,373,641) 1,584,928 Beginning fund balance 24,573,898 24,573,898 Ending fund balance 21,615,329 23,200,257 Page 6 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS #101 • STREET FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed 2015 91,7° 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of November November 30 Remaining Budget Revenues Motor Vehicle Fuel (Gas) Tax 1,859,900 160,842 1,601,927 (257,973) 86.13% Investment Interest 3,000 235 2,469 (531) 82.31% Insurance Premiums & Recoveries 0 0 4,319 4,319 0.00% Utility lax 2,565,100 168,033 1,882,771{682,329) 73,40° Miscellaneous Revenue 10,000 404 9,647 (353) 96.47% Total Recurring Revenues 4,438,000 329,514 3,501,133 (936,867) 78.89% Exvenditures Wages / Benefits / Payroll Taxes 677,297 64,933 644,956 32,341 95.23% Supplies 111,500 5,686 112.449 (949) 100.85% Services & Charges 2,122,808 371,201 1,776,187 346,621 83.67% Snow Operations 520,000 23,647 245,516 274,484 47.21% Intergovernmental Payments 748,000 110,903 601,571 146,429 80.42% Interfund Transfers -out - #001 39,700 3,308 36,392 3,308 91.67% Interfund Transfers -out -#501 (non -plow vehicle 12,077 1,006 11,071 1,006 91.67% Interfund Transfers -out - #311 (pavement preserve 206,618 17,218 189,400 17,218 91.67% Interfund Transfers -out - #502 (unemployment) 0 0 38 (38) 0.00% Total Recurring Expenditures 4,438,000 597,904 3,617,579 820,421 81.51% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 0 (268,390) (116,446) (116,446) [NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grants 0 0 0 0 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 0 0 0 0 0.00% Expenditures Capital 45,000 5,563 90,566 (45,566) 201.26% Pavement marking grinder 8,000 0 6,019 1,981 75.23% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 53.000 5.563 96.584 (43,584) 182.23% Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures (53,000) (5,563) (96,584) (43,584) Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures (53,000) (273,953) (213,031) (160,031) Beginning fund balance 1,705,244 1,705,244 Ending fund balance 1,652,244 1,492,213 Page 7 P:1Finance\Finance.Activity Reports1Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS continued #103 - PATHS & TRAILS Revenues Motor Vehice Fuel (Gas) Tax Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Miscellaneous Capital Outlay Total expenditures Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget November November 30 Remaining % of Budget 7,800 678 6,756 (1,044) 86.62% 0 4 45 45 0.00% 7,800 682 6,801 (999) 87.19% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 7,800 682 6,801 (999) Beginning fund balance 29,828 29,828 Ending fund balance 37,628 36,629 #104 - TOURISM FACILITIES HOTEL/MOTEL TAX FUND Revenues Tourism Facilities Hotel/Motel Tax 178,700 32,422 127,710 (50,990) 71.47% investment Interest 0 15 35 35 0.00% Total revenues 178,700 Expenditures Capital Expenditures 0 Total expenditures 32,437 127,745 (50,955) 71.49% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 178,700 32,437 127,745 (50,955) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 178,700 127,745 #105 - HOTEL / MOTEL 'FAX FUND Revenues Hotel/Motel Tax Investment Interest 550,000 49,880 497,351 (52,649) 90.43% 300 38 358 58 119.45% Total revenues550,300 49,918 497,710 (52,590) 90.44% Expenditures Interfund Transfers -#001 30,000 0 0 30,000 0.00% Interfund Transfers - #309 (Volleyball Cts) 68,000 0 68,000 0 100.00% Tourism Promotion 502,000 31,168 343,725158,275 68.47% Total expenditures 600,000 31,168 411,725 188,275 68.62% Revenues over (under) expenditures (49,700) 18,730 85,985 (240,865) Beginning fund balance 209,949 209,949 Ending fund balance 160,249 295,934 Page 8 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reparts\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xisx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued #106 - SOLID WASTE Revenues Sunshine Administrative Fee Grant Proceeds Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget November November 30 Remaining % of Budget 125,000 0 93,750 31,250 75.00% 26,800 0 0 26,800 0.00% 151,800 0 93,750 58,050 61.76% Expenditures interfund Transfers - #001 40,425 40,425 40,425 0 100.00% Supplies 0 0 153 (153) 0.00% Services & Charges 111,375 0 30,377 80,998 27.27% Waste to Resources Activities 0 9,587 9,587 (9,587) 0.00% Total expenditures 151,800 50.012 80,541 71,259 53.06% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (50,012) 13,209 (13,209) Beginning fund bale nce 7,339 7,339 Ending fund balance 7,339 20,548 #107 - PEG FUND Revenues Comcast PEG Contribution Transfers in - #001 92,000 61,931 61.931 30,069 67.32% 267,300 267,333 267,333 (33) 100.01% Total revenues 359,300 Expenditures PEG Reimburse - CMTV PEG COSV Broadcast Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning fund balance Ending fund balance 329,264 329,264 30,036 91.64% 12,000 0 0 12,000 0.00% 68,400 42,514 42,514 25,886 62.15% 80,400 278,900 0 42,514 286.750 42,514 286.750 0 37.886 52.88% 278,900 286.750 #120 - CENTER PLACE OPERATING RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest Interfund Transfer Total revenues Expenditures Operations Total expenditures 0 0 (7,850) 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0.00% 0 it 0 0 0.00% 0 0 Q 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 0 0 0 Beginning fund balance 300,000 300,000 Ending fund balance 300,000 300,000 Page 9 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xisx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget November November 30 Remaining % of Budget #121 -SERVICE LEVEL STABILIZATION RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 8,200 614 6,047 (2,153) 73.75% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues Expenditures Operations Total expenditures 8,200 614 6,047 (2,153) 73.75% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures 8,200 614 6,047 (2,153) Beginning fund balance 5,453,199 5,453,199 Ending fund balance 5,461,399 5,459,246 #122 - WINTER WEATHER RESERVE FUND Revenues Investment Interest 800 63 587 (213) 73.32% Interfund Transfer 0 0 0 0 0.00% Subtotal revenues 800 60 587 (213) 73.32% Expenditures Snow removal expenses 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Total expenditures 500,000 0 0 500,000 0.00% Revenues over (under) expenditures (499,200) 60 587 (500,213) Beginning fund balance 504,020 504,020 Ending fund balance 4,820 504,607 #123 - CIVIC FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest I nterfu nd Transfer - #001 1,300 73 1,052 (248) 80.91% 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total revenues 1,300 73 1,052 (248) 80.91% Expenditures Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0.00% Transfers out - #311 (pavement preservation) 616,284 51,357 564,927 51,357 91 67% Total expenditures 616,284 51,357 564,927 51,357 91.67% Revenues over (under) expenditures (614,984) (51,279) (563,875) (51,605) Beginning fund balance 1,174,070 1,174,070 Ending fund balance 559,086 610,195 Page 10 P;1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports12015'2015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 ❑EBT SERVICE FUNDS #204 - DEBT SERVICE FUND Revenues Spokane Public Facilities District Interfund Transfer -in - #301 Interfund Transfer -in - #302 Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7°J 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget November November 30 Remaining % of Budget 373,800 0 99,400 (274.400) 26.59% 82,150 6,846 75,304 (6.846) 91.67% 82,150 6,846 75,304 (6.846) 91.67% Total revenues 538,100 13,692 250,008 (288,092) 46.46% Expenditures Debt Service Payments - CenterPlace 373.800 274,400 335,778 38,022 89.83% Debt Service Payments - Roads 164,300 144,650 150,003 14,297 91.30% Total expenditures 538,100 419,050 485,781 52,319 90.28% Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (405,358) (235,773) (340,410) Beginning fund balance 4,049 4,049 Ending fund balance 4,049 (231,724) Page 11 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reparts\Council Monthly Report51201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS #301 - CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 1 - Taxes Investment Interest Total revenues Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of November November 30 Remaining Budget 800,000 65,168 994,312 194,312 124.29% 1,000 122 1,150 150 115.04% 801,000 65,289 995,463 194,463 124.28% Expenditures lnterfund Transfer -out - #204 82,150 6,846 75,304 6,846 91,67% lnterfund Transfer -out - #303 569,413 0 490,221 79,192 86.09% lnterfund Transfer -out - #311 (pavement preset', 251,049 0 251,049 0 100.00% Total expenditures 902,612 6,846 816,574 86,038 90.47% Revenues over (under) expenditures (101,612) 58,444 178,889 108,425 Beginning fund balance 1,426,957 1,426,957 Ending fund balance 1,325,345 1,605,846 #302 SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues REET 2 - Taxes Investment Interest 800,000 63,665 849,476 49,476 106.18% 1,000 119 1,170 170 117,02% Total revenues 801,000 63,784 850,646 49,646 106.20% Expenditures lnterfund Transfer -out - #204 82,150 6,846 75,304 6,846 91.67% lnterfund Transfer -out -#303 413,271 0 63,143 350,128 15.28% InterfundTransfer-out-#311 (pavementpresen 251,049 0 251,049 0 100.00% Total expenditures 746,470 6,846 389,496 356,974 52.18% Revenues over (under) expenditures 54,530 56,938 461,151 (307,328) Beginning fund balance 1,325,144 1,325,144 Ending fund balance 1,379,674 1,786,295 Page 12 P:IFtnance\Finance Activity ReportslCouncil Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed 2015 91.7/„ 2015 Budget Actual Actua[ thru Budget 6 of November November 30 Remair.ing Budget #303 STREET CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues. Grant Proceeds 10,321,343 236,063 4,831,166 (5,490,177) 46.81% Developer Contribution 364,378 0 301,350 (63,028) 82.70% Miscellaneous 0 0 50 50 0.00% Transfer -in - #301 569,413 0 490,221 (79,192) 86.09% Transfer -in - #302 413,271 0 63,143 (350,128) 15.28% Transfer -in - #312 Sullivan Rd W Bridge 500,000 0 6,889 (493,111) 1.38% Investment Interest 0 3 27 27 0.00% Total revenues 12,168,405 236,066 5,692,846 (6,475,559) 46.78% Expenditures 060 Argonne Rd Corridor Upgrade SRTG 06-31 1,214,829 18,464 1,245,153 (30,324) 102.50% 123 Mission Ave -Flora to Barker 252,570 2,069 32,747 219,823 12.97% 141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 10,000 2,497 9,518 482 95.18% 142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 120,494 2,012 13,541 106,953 11.24% 149 Sidewalk Infill 93,190 0 8,177 85,013 8.77% 155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement 7,846,931 1,026,443 4,366,063 3,480,868 55.64% 156 Mansfield Ave. Connection 1,172,716 28,025 704,703 468,013 60.09% 159 University Rd /1-90 Overpass Study 40,852 767 2,842 38,010 6.96% 166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int. Safety 101,110 5,474 78,175 22,935 77,32% 167 Citywide Safety Improvements 260,576 78,493 210,803 49,773 80.90% 177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study 55,556 0 19,332 36,224 34.80% 191 Vista Rd BNSF Xing Safety Improvements 300 0 190 110 63.29% 196 8th Avenue - McKinnon to Fancher 400 0 396 4 99.11% 201 ITS Infill Project Phase 1 (PE Start 2014) 56,056 2,503 7,835 48,221 13.98% 205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvements 51,428 178 6,671 44,757 12.97% 206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project 357,714 88,948 301,718 55,996 84.35% 207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access 85,000 120 120 84,880 0.14% 211 Trent Lighting Replacement 96,535 15,301 65,660 30,875 68.02% 220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell St Preservation 18,473 0 15,555 2,918 84.21% 221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mision) 56,800 0 0 56,800 0.00% 222 Citywide Reflective Signal Backplates 4,500 0 0 4,500 0.00% 223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF & Trent 10,000 0 2,000 8,000 20.00% 224 Mullan Rd Street Preservation 162,375 0 133,069 29,306 81.95% xxx N. Sullivan Corridor ITS Project 0 0 0 0 0.00% Contingency 100,000 0 0 100,000 0.00% Total expenditures 12,168,405 1,271,294 7,224,269 4,944,136 Revenues over (under) expenditures 0 (1,035,229) (1,531,423) (11,419,695) Beginning fund balance 72,930 72,930 Ending fund balance 72,930 (1,458,493) Note: Work performed in the Street Capital Projects Fund for preservation projects is for items such as sidewalk upgrades that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 13 59.37% P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Cauncii Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30,xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget °/0 of November November 30 Remaining Budget #309 - PARKS CAPITA' PROJFCTS FUND Revenues Grant Proceeds 90,000 0 0 (90,000) 0.00% Interfund Transfer -in - #001 115,575 8,333 107,242 (8,333) 92.79% Interfund Transfer -in - #105 (Brown Volleyball C1 68,000 0 68,000 0 100.00% Interfund Transfer -in #312 (Appleway Trail) 554,650 0 0 (554,650) 0.00% Investment interest 500 5B 572 72 114.44% Total revenues 828,725 8,391 175,814 (652,911) 21.21% Expenditures 176 Appleway Trail - University to Pines 540,600 555 524,085 16,515 96.95% 203 Browns Park Volleyball Courts 244,200 0 241,481 2,719 98.89% 208 Old Mission Trailhead Parking Improvements 0 3 68 (68) 0.00% 212 Edgecliff Park Restroom Sewer Project 0 3 (6,923) 6,923 0.00% 217 Edgecliff picnic shelter 106,450 3 104,257 2,194 97.94% 225 Pocket dog park 98,975 3 8,078 90,898 8.16% 227 Appleway Trail - Pines to Evergree 104,050 492 884 103,166 0.85% 231 Mission Trailhead landscaping 47,100 703 5,600 41,500 11.89% xxx Shade structure at Discovery Playground 38,000 0 0 38,000 0.00% xxx City entry sign 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures 1,179,375 1,743 877,529 301,846 74.41% Revenues over (under) expenditures (350,650) 6,643 (701,715) (954,757) Beginning fund balance 451,720 451,720 Ending fund balance 101,070 (249,995) #310 - CIVIC FACILITIES CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND Revenues Investment Interest 1,200 155 1,536 336 127.99% Interfund Transfer -in - #001 339,300 28,275 311,025 (28,275) 91.67% Interfund Transfer -in - #312 58,324 58,324 58,324 0 100.00% Total revenues 398,824 86,755 370,885 (27,939) 92.99% Expenditures Capital (City Hall Land Acquisition) 1,128,200 0 1,128,118 82 99.99% Professional Services 12,100 (210,402) 8,621 3,480 71.24% Total expenditures 1,140,300 (210,402) 1,136,738 3,562 99.69% Revenues over (under) expenditures (741,476) 297,157 (765,854) (31,501) Beginning fund balance 1,919,550 1,919,550 Ending fund balance 1,178,074 1,153,696 Note: The fund balance includes 7839.285.10 paid by the Library District for 2.82 acres at the Balfour Park site. If the District daes not succeed in geffing a voted bond approved by October 2017 then the City may repurchase this and at the original sale price of $639,265.70. Page 14 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of November November 30 Remaining Budget #311 - STREET CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 20114 Revenues Interfund Transfers in- #101 206,618 17,218 189,400 (17,218) 91.67% Interfund Transfers in -#123 616,284 51,357 564,927 (51,357) 91.67% Interfund Transfers in- #301 251,049 0 251,049 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in -#302 251,049 0 251,049 0 100.00% Interfund Transfers in- #001 920,000 76,667 843,333 (76,667) 91.67% Grant Proceeds 971,032 0 853,234 (117,798) 87.87% investment Interest 0 242 2,386 2,386 0.00% Total revenues 3,216,032 145,484 2,955.379 (260,653) 91.90% Expenditures Pre -Project GeoTech Services 50,000 0 0 50,000 0.00% Pavement Preservation 2,565,050 0 0 2,565,050 0.00% 179 2013 Street Preservation Ph2 0 0 2,851 (2,851) 0.00% 180 2013 Street Preservation Ph3 0 0 209 (209) 0.00% 186 Adams Road Resurfacing 0 0 388 (388) 0.00% 187 Sprague Ave Preservation Project 0 0 2,915 (2,915) 0.00% 188 Sullivan Rd Preservation Project 0 220 888,168 (888,168) 0.00% 202 Appleway Street Preservation Project 0 0 226 (226) 0.00% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 223,781 434,186 (434,186) 0.00% 218 Montgomery Ave Street Preservation 0 14 307,920 (307 ,920) 0.00% 220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell Street Preservation 0 353 293,544 (293.544) 0.00% 224 Mullan Rd Street Preservation 0 1,003 355,863 (355.863) 0.00% 229 32nd Ave Preservation 0 14,183 22,854 (22,854) 0.00% 233 Broadway Ave St Presery - Sulliv to Moore 0 1,425 1,425 (1,425) 0.00% Total expenditures 2.615,050 240,977 2,310,549 304,501 88.36% Revenues over (under) expenditures 600,982 (95,493) 644,830 (565,154) Beginning fund balance 1,922,013 1,922,013 Ending fund balance 2,522,995 2,566,843 #312 - CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Revenues Transfers in - #001 1,783,512 1,783,512 1183.512 0 100.00% Investment Interest 0 0 0 0 0.00% Developer Contribution 0 0 0 0 0.001/4 Total revenues 1,783,512 1,783,512 1,783,512 0 100.00% Expenditures Transfers out - #303 - Sullivan Rd W Bridge 500,000 0 6,889 493,111 1.38% Transfers out - #309 - Appleway Trail 540,600 0 0 540,600 0.00% Transfers out - #309 - Appleway Trail (Pines to E 14,050 0 0 14,050 0.00% Transfers out - #310 - City Hall Land 58,324 58,324 58,324 0 100.00% Transfers out - #313 - City Hall Constr 5,162,764 5,162,764 5,162,764 0 100.00% Total expenditures 6,275,738 5,221,088 5,227,977 1,047,761 83.30% Revenues over (under) expenditures (4,492,226) (3,437,575) (3,444,465) (1,047,761) Beginning fund balance 8,581,715 8,581,715 Ending fund balance 4,089,489 5,137,250 #313 - CITY HALL CONSTRUCTION FUND Revenues Transfers in - #312 5,162,764 5,162,764 5,162,764 0 100.00% Total revenues 5,162,764 5,162,764 5,162,764 0 100.00% Expenditures Professional Services 702,400 248,163 248,166 454,234 35.33% Total expenditures 702,400 248,163 248,166 454,234 35.33% Revenues over (under) expenditures 4,460,364 4,914,599 4,914,598 (454,234) Beginning fund balance 0 0 Ending fund balance 4,460,364 4,914,598 Page 15 P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\CounciI Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 ENTERPRISE FUNDS #402 - STORMWATER FUND RECURRING ACTIVITY Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of November November 30 Remaining Budget Revenues Stormwater Management Fees 1,880,000 626,139 1,705,077 (174,923) 90.70% Investment Interest 1.500 176 1,728 228 115.21% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Recurring Revenues 1,881,500 626.315 1,706,805 (174,695) 90.72% Expenditures Wages I Benefits 1 Payroll Taxes 488,101 39,540 357,979 130,122 73.34% Supplies 15,900 348 29,621 (13,721) 186.30% Services & Charges 1,097,468 84,577 929,742 167,726 84.72% Intergovernmental Payments 27,000 0 14,091 12,909 52.19% InterfundTransfers-out -4001 13,400 1,117 12,283 1,117 91.67% Total Recurring Expenditures 1,641,869 125,582 1,343,716 298,153 81.84% Recurring Revenues Over (Under) Recurring Expenditures 239,631 500,733 363,089 123,458 NONRECURRING ACTIVITY Revenues Grant Proceeds 389,674 0 380,857 (8,817) 97.74% lnterfund Transfers -in -#403 120,000 0 120,000 0 100.00% Developer Contributions 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Revenues 509,674 0 500,857 (8,817) 98.27% Expenditures Capital - various projects 875,340 79,068 230,247 645,093 26.30% VMS Trailer 16,000 0 15,546 454 97.16% 188 Sullivan Rd Preservation 0 0 50.680 (50,680) 0.00% 193 Effectiveness Study 0 0 192,638 (192,638) 0.00% 198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0 0 10,453 (10,453) 0.00% 199 Havana - Yale Diversion 0 0 4,887 (4,887) 0.00% 200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion 0 0 3,540 (3,540) 0.00% 206 Sprague/Long Sidewalk Project 0 5,659 25,967 (25,967) 0.00% 211 Sullivan Trent to Wellesley 0 1,837 142,791 (142,791) 0.00% 218 Montgomery Ave. St Preservation 0 0 87,314 (87.314) 0.00% 220 Houk-Sinto-Maxwell St Preservation 0 0 77,361 (77,361) 0.00% 224 Mullan Rd Street Preservation 0 0 16,427 (16,427) 0.00% Total Nonrecurring Expenditures 891,340 Nonrecurring Revenues Over (Under) Nonrecurring Expenditures Excess (Deficit) of Total Revenues Over (Under) Total Expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 86,564 857,852 33,488 96.24% (381,666) (86,564) (142,035) 414,168 1,933,564 (356,995) 24,671 6,095 148,130 1,933,564 1,791,529 1,939,659 Note: Work performed in the Stormwater Fund for preservation projects is for stormwater improvements that were bid with the pavement preservation work. Page 16 P:IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 ENTERPRISE FUNDS - continued Budget Year Elapsed = 2015 91.7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget November November 30 Remaining % of Budget #403 - AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA Revenues Spokane County 500,000 0 296,916 (203,084) 59.38% Grant DOE - Broadway SD Retrofit 1,260,000 0 433,773 (826,227) 34.43% Grant revenue 0 0 602,830 602,830 0.00% Total revenues 1,760,000 0 1,333,519 (426,481) 75.77% Expenditures Interfund Transfer -out - #402 120,000 0 120,000 0 100.00% 197 Broadway SD retrofit 1,080,000 4,935 530,308 549,692 49.10% Total expenditures 1,200,000 4,935 650,308 549,692 54.19% Revenues over (under) expenditures 560,000 (4,935) 683,211 (976,173) Beginning working capital 1,773 1,773 Ending working capital 561,773 664,984 Page 17 P:\Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Budget to Actual Comparison of Revenues and Expenditures For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS #501 - ER&R FUND Revenues Transfer -in -#001 Transfer -in - #101 Transfer -in -#402 Investment Interest Total revenues Expenditures Vehicle Acquisitions Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital Budget Year Elapsed 2015 91,7% 2015 Budget Actual Actual thru Budget % of November November 30 Remaining Budget 19,300 1,608 17,692 (1,608) 91.67% 12,077 1,006 11,071 (1,006) 91.67% 4,167 347 3,820 (347) 91.67% 1,000 104 1,020 20 102.01% 36,544 3,066 33,602 (2,942) 91.95% 30,000 0 23,790 6,210 79.30% 30,000 0 23,790 6,210 79.30% 6,544 1,235,794 3,066 9,812 1,235,794 1,242,338 1,245,606 (9,152) #502 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Revenues Investment Interest 0 1 6 6 0.00% Interfund Transfer - #101 0 0 38 38 0.00% interfund Transfer -#001 325,000 27,083 297,917 (27,083) 91.67% Total revenues 325,000 27,084 297,961 (27,039) 91.68% Expenditures Auto & Property Insurance 325,000 0 284,112 40,888 87.42% Unemployment Claims 0 0 13,656 (13,656) 0.00% Miscellaneous 0 0 0 0 0.00% Total expenditures Revenues over (under) expenditures Beginning working capital Ending working capital 325,000 0 297,766 27,232 91.62% 0 168,209 168,209 27,084 193 168,209 168,402 SUMMARY FOR ALL FUNDS Total of Revenues for all Funds 74,208,705 15,357,454 60,608,147 Per revenue status report 74,208,705 15,357,454 60,608,147 Difference 0 0 0 Total of Expenditures for all Funds Per expenditure status report 78,056,137 13,394,975 62,012,024 78,056,137 13,394,975 62,012,024 0 0 (0) Total Capital expenditures (included in total expenditures) 20,048,270 1,703,205 13, 244,773 Page 18 (54,272) P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports\2015\2015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Investment Report For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 Beginning Deposits Withdrawls Interest Ending 001 General Fund 101 Street Fund 103 Trails & Paths 104 Tourism Facilities Hotel/Mote! 105 Hotel/Motel 120 CenterPlace Operating Reserve 121 Service Level Stabilization Reserve 122 Winter Weather Reserve 123 Civic Facilities Replacement 301 Capital Projects 302 Special Capital Projects 303 Street Capital Projects Fund 304 Mirabeau Point Project 307 Capital Grants Fund 309 Parks Capital Project 310 Civic Buildings Capital Projects 311 Pavement Preservation 312 Capital Reserve Fund 402 Stormwater Management 403 Aquifer Protection Fund 501 Equipment Rental & Replacement 502 Risk Management *Local Government Investment Pool 12/7/2015 LGIP' BB CD 2 BB CD 3 Total 1 Investments $ 42,089,963.14 $ 3,003,008.62 $ 2,007,472.32 $ 47,100,444.08 2,088,988.68 0.00 0.00 2,088,988.68 0.00 0.00 (7,472.32) (7,472.32) 5,811.89 0.00 0.00 5,811.89 $ 44,184,763.71 $ 3,003,008.62 $ 2,000,000.00 $ 49,187,772.33 matures: 6/28/2016 11/4/2016 rate: 0.40% 0.50% Balance Earnings Budget Current Period 1 Year to date $ 31,753,272.40 $ 6,317.32 $ 54,673.65 $ 65,000.00 1,986,830.93 234.76 2,469.34 3,000.00 34,803.27 4.11 44.55 0.00 127,744.72 15.09 34.87 0.00 324,684.55 38.36 358.35 300.00 300,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,200,457.91 614.47 6,047.22 7,300 00 504,436.58 59.60 586.56 700.00 663,772.39 78.43 1,051.82 1,700.00 1,028,961.27 121.58 1,150.38 1,000.00 1,006,353.22 118.91 1,170.21 1,000.00 22,890.83 2.70 26.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 492,054.43 58.14 572.19 500.00 1,320,856.24 156.07 1,535.92 1,900.00 2,052,193.29 242.48 2,386.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,486,110.16 175.59 1,728.09 2,500.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 877, 240.10 103.65 1,020.08 1,000.00 5,110.04 0.60 5.95 0.00 $ 49,187,772.33 $ 8,341.86 $ 74,862.14 $ 85,900.00 Page 19 P:1Finance\Finance Activity Reports\Council Monthly Reports1201512015 11 30.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Sales Tax Receipts For the Eleven -Month Period Ended November 30, 2015 Month 12/7/2015 Difference Received 2014 2015 February 1,891,031.43 March 1,324,975.84 April 1,357, 736.39 May 1,636,894.44 June 1,579,545.34 July 1,653, 343.86 August 1,751,296.73 September 1,772,033.14 October 1,754,039.63 November 1,802,029.08 16,522,925.88 December 1,619,010.52 January 1,565,739.35 19,707,675.75 1,962,820.56 1,358,307.78 1,401,618.35 1,655,903.08 1,557,740.48 1,886,262.22 1,944,085.56 1,894,514.58 1,765,807.42 1, 836, 885.94 17,263,945.97 17,263,945.97 71,789.13 33,331.94 43,881.96 19,008.64 (21,804.86) 232,918.36 192,788.83 122,481.44 11,767.79 34,856.86 3.80% 2.52% 3.23% 1.16% (1.38%) 14.09% 11.01% 6.91% 0.67% 1.93% 741, 020.09 4.48% Sales tax receipts reported here reflect remittances for general sales tax, criminal justice sales tax and public safety tax. The sales tax rate for retail sales transacted within the boundaries of the City of Spokane Valley is 8.7%. The tax that is paid by a purchaser at the point of sale is remitted by the vendor to the Washington State Department of Revenue who then remits the taxes back to the various agencies that have imposed the tax. The allocation of the total 8.7% tax rate to the agencies is as follows: - State of Washington 6.50% - City of Spokane Valley 0.85% - Spokane County 0.15% - Spokane Public Facilities District 0.10% * - Crminial Justice 0.10% * - Public Safety 0.10% * 2.20% local tax - Juvenile Jail 0.10% * - Mental Health 0.10% * - Law Enforcement Communications 0.10% * - Spokane Transit Authority 0.60% * . 8.70% * Indicates voter approved sales taxes In addition to the .85% reported above that the City receives, we also receive a portion of the Criminal Justice and Public Safety sates taxes. The distribution of those taxes is computed as follows: Criminal Justice: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 10% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the County and the cities within the County. Public Safety: The tax is assessed county -wide and of the total collected, the State distributes 60% of the receipts to Spokane County, with the remainder allocated on a per capita basis to the cities within the County. Page 20 P: FinancelFinance Activity ReportslTax Revenue\Sales Tax120151sales tax collections 2015.xlsx E4- 0 0 0 N Q 4y 47 o a W v s 0) J 0 O W P03 OZE 0-0 d Q M X d ©1@ A) 0= a� o U U) u fA 03 O N M O N 0 N O N O O 0) d O N CO O d O CQ d a e c a v ga O Q00 N Nn a2 CV n Kl M N N d ' 0 r W O r .rr r NM n(OM000)ck(0 00 C0 10 ct0 n N 'r v CO N LC) N d M M N M •cic MMnd030) r cr 10 N M r vN o r N 0)MN00r000) 0 r 0) N viz 0) C0 N d L0 N N M N O C - C- n a CO N n 03 N M M 00 M CO (0)00L0nrn 03 u0 n r N e M CO n [O LI) (0 nOr0)(00N r(0M W-0) M (C) 03 LC)n MO CO CO. M. 0) 0) L❑ a M nn W r W O N 10 10 N .v nndv 03(0' n 100) L0 r N R Liz W W LC) 0 nC0ct0)NM M W 01-0Mvd'tt(0'C N M crW crW N 0 r M r ri C0 0o d 0it0 0i I1, 00-c0)CNR0m oo7 0300 01CO nO nN0i Wnrommncflru� 0)0)7'- d CV 0) C7 00 co 0)(0nnd)00)(0(1) LO O O N r N M N M M W n N 0 n W O M n -crncown—mao,- 03 r n_ r n N CO 0 C N d 0 0 'tf n o0 N 0) It W 0) W W M n 01 CA 100''0'(0Lnr)NON 100]0 .-<)00vc'0iM0 rrCO 0) C0 03 0 N W 0) W v CA O r N N r N o00—N a'Nr—M_c+) M m v CO W W v W In 0) N n W W0)(0 M 0)100 -NM O O r O r co N N N 000 00 A- 0 110 0 C v cM0 n W n 0 cYN C'A W a O) N N 0. -NC- 000.- Vi c n r N v N M lL) M M M T r r r r ..... wovrww M ntn0Mc0 W Non) L[) a Lo w O W LL') M n d 0)4)0(00)0") 0 0) <0 (0 r 103mn)0Nn vd nrrvMvu�uoetsW 0)(ddrr-vnwo 00 rtN-0M)orrn tirr0) CV AON N('400)00)n W n C0 n N 0) W 03 O 00 N Ln O o m cn M Ln � v Ln 61 ro -con _ N o C 9 wRc T O Q 4 n d 0) CQ 0 0 0 O CO N tri M N 0 M W N f0 n 00 W d tt M CD Lf) l[) 00 W (V 12,022, 352 11,817,229 00) W rn r r 13, 814,732 14,617,190 Collected to date 0 0 0 (0 LC) 0) N0 (OM N0 TTM N M or N C M � 03 03 ( r 0) M M M MO MN MM n n N N L0 N 0 0).- ("'3' TT TT n u7 Trvi- o N Lf] O LC) n 7c3 n 0 C•7 o 0) N r � M W v ri tp MTT O r O N 6i (0 (0 0) nm o o Tro o 'a 60 MN N0 r r MO 00 0)007 66 ct 0) c 0) T m n o i0 0 n6 mu-) LC) N (0:110 H O 00) 0 r 6- M0 0)O 00 'Q O IX) 0 CO N V 0)) O N 0 n6 0 r Ti N o 000 ( T L0 ma 0) o 0 dni � o c0 c0 co co C0 v M N M CO C7 O til v n cal n M co n n r r N Q C0 C) n N m W n W M N N- a; O) M r) M 0) .N._. M 00) 0) v u) N N G G (00 N O n 03 0 CO n rs 0 L❑ M 1 0 ' V co. N t` tD m ori e- 0 0 O W (7. 0) 7- n (0 n 0 w (0 CO 00 CO d v 6 d 03 03 W n 6 m I L 0) 0 4a 0 tlN a L m m O 0_ CA T C A 0cO Q .i 2 Q 2 Li 0 ■ i i to 0 Lo Q0 4'65 C 0 o❑ N o @ U cj 1 I _ c y .0 0 a C N m t6 m 0) ,a coc u D (0 , 0J0 0 p ,0 N m „' .ctV d❑ 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 C0 0 0 0 0 L mow 07 = 0 m °-' MO - o o cos o g o O o 0 n in U � 'v � o a) 0 3 rn 0 0 0 -g•9.pap o 0 o a (A .d (p 7 t O O 4 ow. O p O O O o 3 y ° 0 o 0 L 0- as ti r 0 0o L.d ,' 0:ni ) Z0 Q I- o 0 o U P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue1Lodging Tax120151105 hotel motel tax 2015.xIsx 4 O N 0 47 O N 8 C 0 vs 0 N' 4 0 N 4 N C7 N 0 O N 0) O O N CO O N n ( 0 0 N 1eooao mmC (o NO Ca w CO Ca W m L.0 ['J 0,7 SD CO N � � Cn 104014 n 06 00)N.0) n r- 4 O N- 4 c7 co O coo 0 in cv O to con N C) O N niO4 NNv 0 0 .4 N 0 O t- 0- 0) Ni 0 r n O co O N N r (0 4 Cn 47 co co 'r 07 0 r 0) CO 0 n Cr C7 10 N nnNo 4 cc; r N 4 0) N NM 474 in tO n R4 0 N C7 r CO C) COC7 07 n 4. CO 07 CO CD CD 4- 0) 70 0 47 07 M (0 N n 4 6 07 4 ' 0 C) N N Cil 47 C1 r CO 0 c(0 L0 CD 0) OD r N r 0 CO 47 N N. 04 'V 4 10 t0 n N 4 CO 07 CO N .- (1) N 1' 0 C[) v 4 co 0 6 o 0- to 4 (0) co n 0) t- (0 (C7 r 0) Cl I- CD n 07 4T CO 07CO `71 (0 n C] C7 n (o co C7 CO N N N? 4 (C) Co IN 4 N N 4 n 7 0 O co O O co co co, co V t -(o Nnrn N 0640060 07 C7 co' 4 4 Co C) 1- n N 0) 0 v 47 CO d 0) a0 N N 0 r (f7 N n m N 0- 4 CO N N N LC) 0') NT 47 47 Co 4 N r N 0) CO 4 NOtr. CD r- N N r 0 0 C) 7- r' Cd Co N07 C) 0) 0 47 O N f- (L) N 0- 4 CO„'v 070 N N 4 0) Cn — 0) f- 0 0) 01 N N C0 C) 4 4 10 7n C7 CO .d 10 07 N 0 CO 07 CO 47 CO CD CO CO CO a, 07 CO CO 10 N 07 C] 0 (0 N Co N 4 r co 00007 CUN n N C) 4 07 0) n 4 0) 7-- N N C) 0 C) ? to 47 v r C[) N CO 0 07 CO O N CO N T 0 CO CO til N 0 CO 0 O c] N (0 (04 O CO N - CO N N N (�y t7 '- C r CO 0 M C) til O N co co 0 0 (D N N N 07 CO 4 4 10 47 C) CO (O 0 Cl CI CO n 10 0) CO 0)O 00000cocn00R (Ci Ci 0) co (0 0 c r 0 0)0)0)10104(01-0) 04 n O co (0 O CD00 N N N 0) 4 47 (0 Co co 04 CD 0 co 1- 01 0 4 4 rncoco0,000 7r- r000 0-r o00) C'7 07 t0 t- CO CO 04 (07 CO c] 0) c0 N NN C+) (C7 7() 07 n 0 6r h 0) N N N CO C) r7 Ln to 07 0) c0 N CD N CD 0) 1-- 0 0 0 C7 C7 r- 0 7- R0 07 (0 0o N (o .4 (0 (0 4 4640I,N00rN 1- 0 0 07 07 tO N n C7) r CD 0 0 0 +} N 4 0) (0 O 07 N N N 0) el co 4 0 10 CO a`) to E (u N Q1 .0 z 2E) T m a C .D C T C77 0 4 47 c0') co a N n P- O n 0) 4 C0 N 420,270.72 441,891.65 co0 n 0 m 362,792.00 387,437.90 (0 N 47 0 4 CO ci 0) 0) N (1] Cn Total Collections 0 0 0 0 N O (D D c0 CO N 07 C•) CO 0,7 CO 1- Nsi ID co N C7 0 r N M 4 0J O CO CO CD 0) C7 r 0)) N 0) 0 1- N 07 07 N W N 1O- m1'- 47 co co N cn N. 4 V r 47 r O n C) N (3 csi 4�7N 47 0 CY N ((0 0 IN - 0070) O co co co r LO C- n r COLID 0; N 4 0 (0 O h N O co. 0) 0 0) 4. CO 47 10 r0) (0 0 N 0 01 (Is- 00 CO- 0 OC r a) N (C7 n 0 0- O O 0 o a o 0 CO (0 CO 4 CD O 4 CD O CO o co Gni [00 C7 f- 0) 04 (0 00 N V 4 1N70 (4C 0 (LO (0 0 03 40070 N 0 0 N 0 1 - GD 6 r 1- CD N 0 O C7 C) N 0) co 4 7n 00 4 0 N m 0 6 0 0 0 f4 0 f - 44`D 00'7_ 0 (0 CI co 0 (0 N- 0 f- u, 0 Cil r 0 r 44 M 0 Ft 4 o v CD 0 CO O 0 0 r 470 4 CO (0 0 10 W u7 O co n n (0 1 n a; .c m 47 LO CO CO (0 0 0 0 N N 4') 07 N T n 0 v N- co CD CO 0II c 4 co co Lri 6)' co a) a) 0) 3u H b a) C y p = N U 8 N 07 N C) ° D p 0 C N 67 w'1 .i! O @ G l9 G n C7 t) rC V C07 © ro N N❑ O v.7...... `m n` c7 LI -1 ; = a a .EP CD w E E 0°70 01 v .D 7 ((00 7 G) 07 0 3 ( (0 L ro"6o O 7 U 0 a C.1 tv o - p 20 co FO- 0 0 e 0 iL 0 U Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of 0 8 0 m a .0) N y 0 (0 0 P 3 01 T 7 c) to Q Q `° 500,000.00 r 0 ry rVEN O N 00 0 0 0 C7 O O 0 0 8 r o rw 0 0 PAFinance\Finance Activity RepnrtslTax Revenue\REET120151301 and 302 REE7 for 201 (0 zrN N u, 0 N O M 0 N N 0 N d N a N Q O N CO N P 0 N O N eeee e eeee S -100OOemrwr-r r C74)C7 CO?r7 CD C7 C17 tit O CV O N d' lA"4-N-W dt 1 N r r 7- cm OO v 07 r(0 47 CAP10 At 47 ar r- N c" ra.0. OD N N co C3 rn 47 07 y' co, V' r 07 CD 0) Ch P 47 co C] CCD 07 07 d' N N ry M At At P cn 10 10 CNI (0 CO 117 0) r- co P 106 P W CO 05. CO,- C7 ca 470 CV O r- P r .a C3 .r CO CD N CO V 0 CO N V' 04 PN VrM co r 47 OD 47 P CO 47 OD OD h tO 10 11) CO 11) P P N O 10 r7 0)0 07ela) t C1r-N r Y C4 .^- M N N. Y O 1074100) mr tiOD(00)4) 4141 rPr-C7 Tr. 41 t~ OD C7 CO 6) 4761 (D Cu CO 04 v m 0- 6r) (10 007 10 r nr ul (0(0(004 N r7 (0 O CO 0 0)10)N M1 41 04 1277.520.59 vC,IOC*�Np0 1, OD • (0 O +- (0 mr• N •w O O 4) CD 6) N P P 10 r N of h 0 4) COCA r C7 r r O r O CO OD O 117 N OCD O a0 P V' P P 177 47 R co r co N r P r (0 117 co P T N Cc CA CO 10 CO 47 CP C4 N CD P f� c0 v cu N: IN: up oo r•6a M +r 10- 1mC) CNp Ch. O 41 41 C OD Cd 0- (0 T- 04 r 1d CO117 Tr 47 P 00 T 0 O CD N 1.005.521.02 M CD 00 CO C) V• CD V' co C'1 0) C'7 P co co, C7 O C CON C7 6O co N co CD 0 4 n O 0) N 4] P N n co N r Tr. co, CD co„ 47 CD '? O Ci co v up 47 O)'--4 C4 COr C? CO CO COANCnPNCDCD N CO CO Sp v 17.12 CO N 1' N a O CCD r• -. v 0- V 10 V' O 04 CC (0 10 04 10 10 04 10 m (17 r 47 117 00 N 47 CD (D OD CR CO. N 0) O `4iO 6) 0) 47 '1r N u7 C1 47 00 OD. CO C O OO P P CO Cil r r W 04 1mn ODCOCO 447 CO) CO7 COO c- 1017 0- on O CO 41 1') a 0 co N O O 0 47 CO N 10 CV ID CO ,- CO) N t- C7 c- O 117 00 c0 0 47 4'i 41 CS r r= 4`i CV 47 1•i M C) 1t7 1 P OD P O N T O r 10 r r r r m N V 41 co M 10 OD 07 CD C7 C1 C7 °R sr CJ) 67 0 C7 CC? CO cA 01 CD 41 O 01 0 O 00 7 0 -ct 47 41 47 0 C) 117 N CO. O N_ CO 47 0) C7 W 10 W rC7 47 mr ea r ea 0— 1 1) 10 C7 O co P co 6) 4c0 r- u) r-PrN N P P CO 0 r p' 00 N 0) 0) CO O miP P P 6 O P N P CO 0) 07 �[- mCI V 0) O N' (¢') CO O rig.- N P C'7 6 (0 ID CO N CO N 47 N O O O r N N N N N C) N N N N CO N r r CO mr CD CD C7 O O i-- P N ID W (D r O Cl N N 0) PO co(D •f 1a C0 r CA 47 CD CD (.1 CD 0 CD r4 10 10 00 t- b P W 47 r n 0 C? N C7 N N C7 co (p mi. r co r 10 N T - 0) N Y . (v Q7 47 n Z' Cil E W 2 2_ 7. N P g = and U �1_25moi �i4(/7Q N Collected to date CD C5 C 00 rm n cD N OD N cA CW 1- r r N 0) o. -- V O) N N C7 m 1Q 0) P h CO 47 .21 CC 0) CO.04 a P 10- N 407 P r- a v47 P CD N 1n CO CO P P N CO P 07 10 CCD V 10 CD CO N C1 C) A 1) P 0 CD 47 (D CD O 0- (D ,r 0) C7 0. O P tin r - O 1OC7 O 0- 0) C7 0 N CD 41 04 OD 1• N V• O O] .0 .0 C 10 a c0 0 01 z QD ti) (01010 aiOCa 00 0 07 C) O C7 a O ,r as 10 N O 0 (0 cp e 0 r 47047 r..; C) CD 1D Ca VD 0)10r P O 0. 0 C7 CD 0) C] 0 C) 0 C) cD fD P a1 A N Ca CD O N O Cp CV CD 0- N O N- 05 10 0 10 O O CD CD r N CO CD ,- o 1V O CA 0 0 0 co 0)) O CO 0) 04 0 1= N UD O co 1' P N r e ci 1n N N OD co N x co 07 O a op O N 1p a N CO N 1A C) 0) N CV 10 V co c0 v x p CO C9 apP h (OO 41 O CD QD OD O U 0 Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of a 0 0 2,500,000.00 d `a a A W = u 2 ro w J 2 l ■ rr 0 O C7 N N G N 10 1 A PQ 0 0 0 0 N C• 0 N H:\Finance Activity Reports\2015\debt capacity.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Debt Capacity 12/7/2015 2014 Assessed Value for 2015 Property Taxes Voted (UTGO) Nonvoted (LTGO) Voted park Voted utility 1.00% of assessed value 1.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 2.50% of assessed value 7,393,971,582 Maximum Debt Capacity Outstanding as of 12131/2015 Remaining Debt Capacity Utilized 73,939,716 110,909,574 184,849,290 184,849,290 554,547,870 0 6,375,000 0 0 6,375,000 73,939,716 104,534,574 184,849,290 184,849,290 548,172,870 0.00% 5.75% 0.00% 0.00% 1.15% Bonds Repaid Bonds Remaining 2014 LTGO Bonds Period Ending CenterPiace Road & Street Improvements Total 12/1/2014 12/1/2015 12/1/2016 12/1/2017 12/1/2018 12/1/2019 12/1/2020 12/1/2021 12/1/2022 12/1/2023 12/1/2024 12/1/2025 12/1/2026 12/1/2027 12/1/2028 12/1/2029 12/1/2030 12/1/2031 12/1/2032 12/1/2033 225,000 175,000 135,00'7 125,000 360,000 300,000 400,000 260,000 660,000 185,000 190,000 230,000 255,000 290,000 320,000 350,000 390,000 430,000 465,000 505,000 395,000 300,000 245,000 225,000 180,000 130,000 165,000 130,000 130,000 135,000 140,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 315,000 320,000 365,000 395,000 430,000 465,000 500,000 545,000 430,000 465,000 505,000 395,000 300,000 245,000 225,000 180,000 130,000 165,000 5,250,000 1,125,000 6,375,000 5,650,000 1,385,000 7,035,000 Page 24 • P: IFinancelFinance Activity Reports\Tax Revenue\MVFT12015lmotor vehicle fuel tax collections 2015.xlsx CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Motor Fuel (Gas) Tax Collections - October For the years 2006 through 2015 January February March April May June July August September October 2006 1_ 2007 1 2008 1 2009 1 2010 2011 1 2012 1 2013 1 2014 1- 2015 157,910 145,663 144,867 158,729 152,049 166,506 162,989 183,127 187,645 178,782 172.711 162,079 156,194 175,010 173,475 183,410 178.857 183,815 191,884 180,570 165,698 149,799 159,316 165,574 162,281 176,085 166,823 171,690 176,912 165,842 133,304 155,832 146,264 161,117 156,109 173,954 169,756 179,012 175,965 163,644 161,298 145,869 140,486 161,721 158,119 168,146 164,221 176,869 175,067 164,475 154,792 146,353 141,849 165,019 154,700 158,351 165,398 153,361 173,820 158,889 159,607 135,208 144,297 153,546 144,670 159,827 160,565 164,050 171,651 153,022 146,145 145,998 135,695 156,529 151,595 167,479 155,348 173,983 195,397 133,441 152,906 148,118 131,247 156,269 156,850 161,965 157,805 172,308 173,299 160,539 12/4/2015 2015 to 2014 Difference 152,598 (308) (0.20%) 145,455 (2,663) (1.80%) 140,999 9,752 7.43% 157,994 1,725 1.10% 156,259 (591) (0.38%) 164,872 2,907 1.79% 168,205 10,400 6.59% 186,277 13,969 8.11% 174,505 1,206 0.70% 161,520 981 0.51% Collected to date 1,638,267 1,758,005 1,660,020 1,614,957 1,616,271 1,572,532 1,546,443 1,561,610 1,571,306 1,608,684 November 177,726 181,764 193,360 167,340 168,477 160,461 162,324 164,303 165,871 0 December 159,974 159,750 142,230 144,376 143,257 124,714 138,223 142,140 141,298 0 Total Collections 1,975,967 2,099,519 1,995,610 1,926,673 1,928,005 1,857,707 1,846,990 1,868,053 1,878,475 1,608,684 Budget Estimate 1,753,000 2,000,000 2,150,000 2,050,000 1,900,000 1,875,000 1,897,800 1,861,100 1,858,600 1,858,600 Actual over (under) budg 222,967 99.519 (154,390) (123,327) 28,005 (17,293) (50,810) 6,953 19,875 (249,916) Total actual collections as a % of total budget 112.72% 104.98% 92.82% 93.98% 101.47% 99.08% 97.32% 100.37% 101.07% n/a % change in annual total collected 9.57% 6.25% (4.95%) (3.45%) 0.07% (3.65%) (0.58%) 1.14% 0.56% n/a % of budget collected through October 93.46% 87.90% 77.21% 78.78% 85.07% 83.87% 81.49% 83.91% 84.54% 86.55% % of actual total collected through October 82.91% 83.73% 83.18% 83.82% 83.83% 84.65% 83.73% 83,60% 83.65% nla Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 1 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 October 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 37,378 2,38% October September August July O June • May ■ April is March • February Page 25 ■ CITY OF SPOKANE VALLEY, WA Telephone Utility Tax Collections - For the years 2009 through 2015 January February March April May June July August September October Collected to date P:1FinancelFinance Activity Reports\Tax RevenuelTelephone Tax120151telephone utility tax collections 2015.xlsx October 2009 1 2010 1 2011 1 2012 1 2013 2014 1 2015 November December Total Collections Budget Estimate Actual over (under) budg Total actual collections as a % of total budget % change in annual total collected % of budget collected through October % of actual total collected through October 128,354 282,773 230,721 275,775 242,115 239,334 269,631 260,408 249,380 252,388 234.622 266,041 264,175 254.984 255,056 251,880 250,593 246,261 240,111 238,500 241,357 230,366 245,539 238,561 236,985 239,013 244,191 349,669 241,476 237,111 193,818 261,074 234,113 229,565 227,469 234,542 226,118 228,789 227,042 225,735 217,478 216,552 223,884 214,618 129,270 293,668 213,078 211,929 210,602 205,559 210,777 205,953 208,206 208,038 210,010 210.289 205,651 205,645 199,193 183,767 177,948 212,845 174,738 214,431 187,856 187,412 190,984 185,172 183,351 183,739 2,430,879 254,819 368,775 3,054,473 2,500,000 554,473 2,502,223 247,848 236,065 2,986,136 2,800,000 186,136 2,504,268 240,246 236,449 2,980,963 3,000,000 (19,037) 2,288,265 225,319 221,883 2,735,467 3,000,000 (264,533) 2,136,638 212,947 213,097 2,562,682 2,900,000 (337,318) 12/4/2015 2015 to 2014 Difference $ % (32,829) (15.58%) 6,892 3.35% (33,468) 8,393 (22,154) (22,877) (14,667) (20,473) (15,842) (28) (16.07%) 4.07% (10.55%) (10.88%) (7.13%) (9.96%) (7.95%) (0.02%) 2,045,529 1,898,476 (147,053) (7.19%) 213,454 0 202,077 0 2,461,060 1,898,476 2,750,000 2,565,100 (288,940) (666,624) 122.18% 106.6514 99.3714 91.18% 88.37% 89.49% n!a nla (2.24%) (0.17%) (8.24%) (6.32%) (3.97%) nla 97.24% 89.37% 83.48% 76.28% 73,68% 74.38% 74.01% 79.58% 83.79% 84.01% 83.65% 83.38% 83.1214 nla Chart Reflecting History of Collections through the Month of October 3,000,000 12,500,000 =2,000,000 '1,500,000 61,000,000 500,000 0 2009 2010 2011 October 2012 2013 2014 2015 October September August July a June al May • April u March ■ February • January Page 26 Rick Vanlctrvcn Cbie[o/PoIkc c Spokane Valley Police Department Accredited Since 2011 Services provided in partnership with the Spokane Ct: rnl Office ai , th.c Community, ;:n.t1 ,1[LL!1 OZZie I(nezoticfh TO: Mike Jackson, City I\Ian ager. FROM: Rick VanLeuven, Chief of Police DATE: December 21, 2015 RE: Monthly Report November 2015 November 201.5: November 2014: CAD incidents: 4.519 C;'11) incidents' Reports taken: 1.663 Repurk t,IkL'u: Traffic stops: 1,1)200 Traffic sLr.pti: Traffic reports: -Iiflic re ores: 4,f!.09 1,826 955 329 CAD incidents indicate calls 'Ai s.: jL:.: <1.;: k.�:ll :[� ;till' initiated officer cl,ntwic_ Hot spot iv a:ls are t[iiriched sha °irlr November in r! e collisions. vehicle prowling, ,�..nc stollen Also attached are;. gral:'li for 2012, 201:7. 2014 unci 2015: Citations, Sp: kane `w :}1.cy Dispatched Calls, SelCollisions, Person 0- res, Property Crimes, and Sex (rimes. •\I:o included is the November Crimes by Cities stats report. This report reflects 111:[1 ey.•cinred in a speci lie city to which a deputy From Spokane County took the courtes' rcp[:11. c�ti u1tp1<`. tnav have had his car stolen in Airway Heights. and '1C WUittd until Ile r1:1I.rn1Cd 11t 111,2 w ICH NL`\vinan 1.;ike area to make a report. In 2011, wes�'itch d from LTCR t7o�7N1BRS classification. �'. a result. certain crimes were broken down o 'Il. i ti iir:ation parts for NIBRS and each pari ... no—o.. courted. ConsL:g1 ernly, uoni11.1,1 cc crittic� 17.:It:re 2011 to crimes during or atter 201 I Ij rot I'C".C[1Il1ITHI11[k d using thy t [',tapas. L LiincM that are by the NIII S Fieation c .JL)L 5 that sh_luLJ not be compared tc. prier ▪ include: Adult Rape,..A',:,fault- .:ti 1 t MINISTRATIVE: Spokane Valley Police Denurinieral E;trns Reaccreditation The Slit+ionic %:11"t Police 1)a:pat—lnietlt was recently I C CLrc,..1it_Itior by the Washington `ton AssocLiIor t'I I1e.i.A ti and PohL.T Chiefs (WASPC), and remains the lirst and only contract law en.:lrctinr i t in 11:[:;lain tort State to earn that honor. The reaccreditation process occurs every four yeas to insure the Page 1 agency is operating under best practice and policies. This is the first reaccreditation for the Spokane Valley Police Department following its initial accreditation in 2011. The purpose of law enforct'n'i. 1L ;11:ei-icy accreditation is to prolcssinntili;e the lam' sent :r.cinent industry by providing a rel i[:1'4' pr1`'' : ,ti tor ;111..-lcies to be certified as operating under bosd practises and standards. in 1976 \ . " !>C '1rl directed b; t!"R. \ ,a;,ii I ;!t( tl Shite I ogisl:1t'trc standards and goals for Washington.State Law Enforce.rrtc.at WASP(' I im iri[17111cc an Opc:iit.+111;.iF accreditation program since that time. The current accreditation program was ereat:°d hi 2007 and is overseci. H IlLL I'rc te-ssional Services Committee, Accreditation Commission, and litiard of Di -rectors. The t.'t'ri. nil!e°. is r spoiL..ible for rnairizHltling, accreditation 5t:k17`.f:ll -1 ti_ I. c, CT.cilillll °:r:}11 Cti ft-Tensiblt_`. 1b?" C"ti" Lev:ini' ;,'c'rl[r',tiitiOrl on- sitc Iep!.,[ts and making reci}1];:rie i i.. ilttr . "i} 111 Rttard 01 DircCtor-S. [ he I4ci.:i:cl c Dirixtors is responsible for conferring accreditation. Benefits of Accreditation Include: • To increase public confidence in the agency • To increase creIirility • To provide a sy _cmi zed agency self-assessment • To broaden perspee fives • 1.`t in'.eri iC zclntinist:atand operational effectiveness • To ensure rcc.ruitI]k1l., Scl :r:lion, and promotion proccsses are fair arid equitable • To strengthen tl!identanc.ling of agency policies and procedures by agency personnel • To improve agency Ynoralo and pride ▪ To decrease susceptibility to Litigation and costly civil court settlements • To f:c7l;`1111:.t1!'•' rt'LltIcc liability insurance Costa • 1 ^r {.+ pro `iiLlt4 ;11111 'ocal reci72.-111t1C}tl of l7t`C?1C551{ITIi,'.l competence In the set sessurio]lt tlktisi:, agencies liss tl'li Y]' i1131I1t4' Lo TheL'.t 111 the :Accreditation standards adclressing major law ,Lrxfoti omerit ate is ns established by WASPC's Accreditation Committee. Major arcas of a .acss]rlen.t include einph :sig an: • Goals and Objectives • Role and Authority • U'so or Force • 49anac, e.r ictil, Staffing, {.lr .:L1ii>.ation and Utilization of Personnel • Records \iai en -r;: . • InlCmllalion Techrnolo�7v • • Hee�ftl; tlr,.f ; blL • l'l:; 'LI l'iaL1 ii Iil�'Ltl • RL:c.rllatl]telF1 ;Liv.l • Tr;t;:ning Page 2 • Perforinance Evaluation ▪ Cod; .0I1Ctt[v1 • Into[ ,:[I'tlir[i! • Pairl,ll`11:7cti;-}n • Invt.':-lip..:[tive Function • E1. i;It:vi: and Property Control Function • Prisoner Security During the on-site assessment and evaluation phase, the on. -site assessment team, a group of assessors from law enforcement agencies across Washington State confirms the agency's ability to meet the WASPC accreditation standards. The assessors review agency files for policies and procedures as well as documentation (proofs) showing the agency is operating under the direction of those policies and procedures. Assessors also interview agency members to gather additional information, As part of the WASPC on-site process, assessors are encouraged to note areas where improvement can be made. Suggestions for improvement are compiled in the Final on-site report. If an agency is unable to meet nI; .14.creditation standard at the time of the cm-:itc ,'lt t`ti :l Ik' 1t.:I ,ti. cl.r%. cxiension may be requested for the _J2,ti[[ ~' to nn l•..c 11 1+!°�'rl1 i`1I c.1:pnEc ti lnti submit proof to the WASPC Director .::Professional Services. Nota -compliance issues must be reconciled to the satisfaction of the Director of Professional Services before the agency's presentation to the Accreditation Commission. An agency must resolve non-compliance issues al least 30 days prior to the Commission z eeri1l:i.. at which time the Commission considers the agency r!; :l".'L1"','iitat ion. !'urrfeuveri r.. ; ;t r. ,. Aceredltaticnplaque ' Casey Salisbrtry. In the Accreditation Cornnhi:;4i'.ul i. ',;: ,.. phase, tbw WASP(' SP(' ITh-eetor of Professional Services or the on-site review team lcc[c.iy, *lc ini trator of tlti :14cncy seeking accreditation, and the departmental Accreditation Manager may cIp171•,1,r before Elia 1::ureditation Commission to determine if they have met the standards and the on -sit rc v i ' ar team has done a complete job. The Accreditation Commission then forwards its recommendaLiors to the WASPC Board of Directors for final consideration. in the Executive 13oarcl review 17,1h y.e, the \k rt'4 r.ws 'ilii' 1' :+v4.[rim-4I]4liitioIlli l]y' the Accreditation Commission and issues During the reaccreditation pl1ogL', rcpc [l Hie reaccreditation process is significantly less c;urobersovi , ir tlic .•.:crk:t itatian philosophy and keep agency policies, procetli_.rc•; aul,l recd: -tis up to date. To mairitoi i ;lc:c:rcclitation, agencies must be reaccredited every four yedt s.. Page 3 iii iic,i-pokane Valley PoliceDp:uunciii a COntfact agency of the alroady-acoredited Spokane comity !.-.110,-iff's Office, it could hm..r: bccn ::onsidered Arcady accredited. Spokane Valley Police Ric.k, Van 1.}11`,.';21i :;did., wairw-,,:.tLl i.Lk the extra step of viting the department on its own in,2rits to show citizens and the S11o1,..ItoL, VtIy City Council, that Were g01112, above and beyond." h ii Van 1 iven rioted bcc Lfl red Ii1c-nsnres the deNtImcni. s policies are up-to-date and reduce liability and ; are a mui.v, ionp on al agency for doing so. It really Should increase the public confidence in our agency." The Spokzin_' Police Department provi,:lcs records rilLinai_iciricra for the Spokane Valley Police 1),T:in LnIL prne;t.-;_ Chic:Van Leuven said "They were exoopliow.i1:,..1-1,-1pful k) IN. non-comp:iant.._c ‘,.reas. That doesn't happen very ollen." S 1 IF. PF'S COMMUNITY ORIENTED POLICING EFFORT (S.t OPF In the month of Novembcr, participa!ed in: • • Clk-Acr 1..1e...1w:wary Tnc.irthi l'ft...iciltation and Bike 1 Iclinvi1i(H''' guilders) • '0:11 ition • 600:14,iiiiislc. 1ntorina V • l'a!it (:;.,mmunity CoAir:i.ii NIceting klixting, and • ()pc:ration Family 1!) November 2015 Volunteers Hours per Station incHAL, vokin [cosLr'', ice how flint ale provided in the City of Spokane Valley. These two locations cover 'Joni Spokoric N.• alio) oriti 1 Iii tuninctmporated portion 01 Inc county. #Voluiiteers Adniin Hours LE. Hours Centi-rd Valley East Ville' 10 22 Fatal Hours 122.0 32.0 Edgeoliff 27 -134.0 196.0 [79.5 579.0 37.0 Trentwood 6 137.0 University 22 West Valley* 22 15'1 c 92,0 1 HL,() [ 6,0 TOTALS 109 1,890.5 470.5 175.5 616.0 :229.0 467.5. 519.0 2,361.0 ViIunair Value ($22.14 per hour) $52,272.54 for November 2015 Spokane Val]ey Cri-af Repor 20:2 2013 20]4 2015 0 2 2 7 Page 4 May 16 1 4 4 10 June 15 9 13 5 July 41 7 12 4 Aug. 57 22 6 10 Sept.. 26 4 12 6 Oct. 30 7 6 6 Nov. 19 7 2 4 Dec. 37 1 7 29 Total 257 92 97 79 S.C.O.I'.E. Incident Response Team (SIRT) volunteers contributed 126 on -scene hours (including travel time) in November, responding to crime scenes, motor vehicle accidents and providing traffic control; 36 hours were for incidents specifically in Spokane Valley. There were 8 callouts due to the Wind Storm on November 17th, with a total of 90 hours worked over a two-day period throughout the county; hours were lumped together for volunteers working inside the city limits of Spokane Valley and unincorporated Spokane County. Total November volunteer hours contributed by SIRT, including training, stand-by, re.:pori :Ind ntc•i:ll events is 492; year-to-date total is 5,378 hours. Abandoned ve'lii: 1 iEi�'; _'cl I': ' -.{ .[ 1.1 .1... volunteers for lrnpoundlneait in S,aokai c Valley in October totalcci 7IN and ]n N]rvviober 13 \vith {) vehicles in October and 9 in November, respectively, evorivalI ' cited "Throe i)ull =.ca. cr(:CCsse:d in October and 16 huI`;s proce' cd in November. Luring Lilo month of November, a total of ir4 vehicles \.Vere processed; iEi total for 2015 to LIELtc is 760. SCOPE LATENT PRINT STATS Page 5 TRAINING HOURS SCSO SVPD TOTAL January 0 18 4$ 66 February 0 26 42 68 March 0 22 43 65 April 0 30 27 57 May 0 15 51 66 June 0 27 27 54 July 0 1$ 35 53 Auut.ist 0 29 37 66 September 0 42 43 90 October 0 39 42 81 November 0 0 0 0 YTD - TOTAL 0 271 395 666 Page 5 SCOPE DISABLED PARKING ACTIVITY REPORT City of Spokane Valle #of Vol. '4ofHrs. # cf Val. # of-Hrs. of Disabled Infractions Issued ) of Warnings 1ssted # of Non - Disabled Infractions Issued January 0 0 0 0 0 February 2 10 2 0 0 March 3 24 1 0 0 April 2 2 22 45 1 2 0 0 0 0 i.]:ry i .1 Er 2 33.5 5 0 0 Idly 3 35 4 0 0 Augu.wt 3 37.5 1 0 0 September 2 58 4- 0 0 (c:z. I tir 3 39 2 0 0 'Nr:,. tuber 0 0 0 0 0 4'•1'11 Total 22 304 23 0 0 Spokane County #of Vol. '4ofHrs. 4 of DL.;t'kiI .` of Infractions V. iiiri; . Issued Issued ,r ,i.f on - I ail,:Ibied 111 ! rac;t ' ns Issued d. .Irinualy 3 16.5 0 0 0 I•. hruary 6 26.5 1 0 0 AIrclb 7 54 2 0 0 i Aft': 3 39 10 0 0 May 2 13 0 0 0 June 2 16 0 0 0 July 1 10 0 0 0 August 0 0 0 0 0 September 1 11 0 0 0 October 3 17 0 0 0 November 2 14.5 3 0 0 YTD Total 30 217.5 18 0 0 OPERATIONS: Major Crimes Detectives Investigating IlornieWe - Spokane County Sheriff's Office Major Crimes Detectives investigated a fight that occurred at la residence located in the 14800 block of East Queen Avenue in Spokane Valley, where one l4ccts later died at a local hospital. In early November, at approximately 10:45 `ti.dl]cv Sheril't`; Deputies responded to the residence fora fight between the husbandfla:micl'wne and a i ot']cr Male who was reportedly intoxicated. Deputies contacted the husband and 1. i Li .::i he heel jus[ returricci from a trip and found his wife inside the residence with her boyfriend, An argument c calatAl into a physical fight that ended when the boyfriend struck the husband with., .,�oII'club sevcra1 times before fleeing out ofa window. Deputies checked the area, but were unable -o iccnle tl: boyfriend. At approximately 12:30 p.m., deputies were Page 6 hack to the1cwr;_:c]'cc ror rcltirlrt of two rn:110w 1 hysicall'. li�;It:i1:''. \r'ii<'n the_: :7I[i.^ Ll. ili.2 (..or.:Lt'ted the lin,sl)J+'..1 I1 Iltint [} I.1c declL'. i: the C1 Iy'.Ilrt`. tilil't:.was a Cl't'.l 11'rsicle 111.E L" ld ll.. ww'I",J heeded I)epLLl]L`s locatL:d 'Le Li7,a1C wv'ho idem led as tli{. 1 lrik":iti Ii"on1 the P1rL,vious incident, f -Ie was a1w'u Llcc ;.aLcl but it:c i11L'Li nt. Spokane '4'' Ill Fite [ti, [ 1 77.1Nt. I [e was t1Lil,.l i.il'I:eCI L: -y !} IL1C;.1 I".(141311:11_ ',NI1LL later in 1U! ?t!rIL .1 1[71' iri'7:1titi):i 1r45111 tF+t' Itt:w1';II'll,_, who C{i["}l!c'1i1tti+.I `:'r'llli inve l,Ii'.liui .. is Lac 11L'elll I`:'L11;11 +,l !i1 I.I1L1 ft' II L:II[: 1e111eed his inside, and a 1!!iln ::THued 17t`t5:',' til'. thL.a. 7.. I.)Llw; 1.(? the 1!11+,1114 ;, N1:IjL1" 1111L. l)etectivc- were the scene to ;!c'IcrL111S1C ww'11et:1C1' a c[LI!'it ivoN s•t.)1L111'1tr:.'t: tiiF 11 LI:I, was acI dL.1C11tiL Rr►lil7CL'y Su Teci Soo,,41it - Crime Stoppers Reward Offered - Spokane County Sheriff's Office fvl:i1c^r 1? cci.',',;x;:. are investigating a rcbbcry at Sally Beauty Supply that i}uuLirred in early No cinL or 117 : llL.Liac `5':tlley..jiit,t 'after gam. Spokane Valley S11c.:r f`rs 1 '.putics responded to the business located at I The emlwploycc: told deputies the suspect came int[) the sioie Arid 'lull-: ii1Lied money. I 1 4 w 1 1 rn .:iii not sec Lt weapon, but 1hL sllTcc1 I:cp1 his hand in his pocket and :11711{1.;1 lie had one ir The S;I*.peet is described male_ )'7-40 years ;1f age with a thin build, I7 LIf_ c..!- I-nItliii .• .ui�1 ],,7 1 inial !lair. Ile WAS 1-'eari]1g.1 dark gra} ,;.:.1tc:. jeans, and had his face partially covered. .1 ire: sLlsf7ec'.- exited the business and possibly left : otCtlibound on foot. Anyone with information regarding this robbery, or can hell, idi n1 1 urged t{1 call Crime Stoppers ofthe Inland Northwest. Crime Stoppers o 'the Inland Northwest is •:if`icrir7, a cash reward for anyone providing information leading to an arrest in this incident. Person:,; w`• illi infon-nation should call the Crime Stoppers Tip Line at 1 -$O0 -222 -TIPS, Or should submit the tip Vial the Internet website htto://www.critnestoppersiolandnorthA,vest.oru. Tipsier:; L]0 not have to give their I7 -7117.c to collect the cash reward. Crime Stoppers of the Inland Nortltwwvst is .t civilian organization that promotes public safety by paying cash rewards for infnr+llaLion that solves cri:res. h not affiliated with law enforcement, Detective Seeks Identity of Robbery/Assault Suspect - In c.:Irl} \..i,tiinher, at t.17I?r;virlllla:.:1`, 61.15 p,1n., Spokane Valley Sheriffs Deputies responded to \V MO) I''.1++LIs in pokane V.ilk2y for a reportci robbery. A'WinCa loss prevention employe., r_ orted a. rnik stlspe,:t REirod sonic eye drops in his pockt•t and past the cheek stands tov'S'.Lr.I 1 7i c.di c1,1 1]s without 11;1', it for 'he itc'I'7_ The employee the suspect. identified Itiiiii- 11 .Ls -1(11,:s l rnw-enlion and altil<.ed tilt ti1141sc.'.'t Lo G.v with hien to thea security office. I.71e Isl)4Ll to ecu I1L !lint, tlic .%L1 17L.k`I began to resist. Ili on; 1'3ni:it duH rig the, 5.11.1 SrIt , I I: S;71tits.L:l t`.-'1;r1ipLL.1 nisi Head around and tilr_IS_' t11L` eriipIoyee i17 the f:71t`. I i1^L` susl'.L`i'l '..VaIS .stlhdl-1eld and '7I'uu ,ht hack to tic security c.ilf1Cc;, A s$ioi-! l]111c leiter. 117.:._, pact charged at a second l;ti1c' einp}lovec_ pushed hire niid the. store. Dr1ll,tic�. i11ft1LIrJ1ur a 'tih1.niil's Office K9, yc'lir4ltt,i 11i .:ic:c. ":7LLt the suspect was not located. Anyone ww.t11 ill 'l7II:E[LLn1'' I'l'S';I]'L.li]lm!_ lI r•; robbery or i'11l Help iLenlil\ !his male is asked to cid I Detective Stall at 71.1*l -t 7_.3 JOULi[Ld refere]ic, #- 1 5 yt)11 iL15 Reported \'chit! • Prowler Arrned w4iib a Knife Gtic's to .!ail - In early Noventhe:r, justl>�'. Spsi't.IlLL: Valley Sheriff's Deputy Andrew Richmond ILNr I1..ictl to the area t+ 1sI1 <:Ll',.':n :rl,.:: { "on1.:Iirt rL, ii - sIilinic a report of a person breaking into, area... C.i1i1.i.r1 called ;LIIi.I r.,,-,,i7r,.:'.1 tied77i; a 3 \,c1]r-1,1cf male break into a vehicle. Illi .=,;17cct w"•L1 descr ibcd is wearing datk clothing, a b ick] ack and !:c Was possibly armed with what i1i.' cH i> n th0tig 11 ', tt- scis ..7rs. When 17eputy. Richmond .iiriw'4'{[ in the area, he observed the L71LI!e s I pCGt who matched 7.11. description, walking \vest on Broadway Deputy Richmond watched the., stilled DS he apprEi.7<;'i'd y. vehicle parkcd 111 a drive And `gnit tovigorously pullonthe door li:s[7:Ile. E)cputyRich Ii1LI] !,11L!:ricdor. hi5er11r.el:cy' lights, pulled ;11, to elft driveway, identified hiinscli and 1c :L Illy sllp.i.-t It w17i7.5- lliti ll.iri,tti. 'lie,' 117;71e suspect turned tov,:ird [X.-mi.:N.' Richmond, kepl holk-Jug. a kii-2,JE,Ipt.::k kniL: in his right IlII1LI. Deptit.y FLnniclaleret.'_ the suspect to &o: -i And Ice diJ not coniply p.nd :];ed why being contacted. 1.-),Tiiiy 16:m11oz-1 Male 110 .q1'-;pcCi. in a crime and ordered him drop the Lnife. Rink! s1.T.] at Dcputy Richmcnki .1.•.L1 did not coniply with commands. Noi Ifnc inzadiuns and his continncd failure to comply with orders to drop the knife, Deputy Richroi.-..1D.1 rc. ▪ i jii1 lickl it at .11 OW cidy. ordered the suspect to drop the knife. Finally. the iimlc dro-,-,,pi_d the knife and turned away 1)epat y Richmond_ Deputy Warts arrived to assis! :Hid the male suspect was safely- token into custody and advised of his righi.. rho male SUFliect ad n7, -c, tc-d he didn't know who lived at ihc, residence orValOSC chicle he tried to enter. Ile was. ttdvied ii 1,eirig charged wiih An.maptal Vehicle P: -owl inc.; 2'11)c -14i -cc and Obstructing. 'While sewchilqr,i I ▪ i i1 Deptun:,; Richmond loLited registration to another vehicle in his pocket. Devi tv C'el.:C:c:d the ov.u.,-..• \V]11 lived a sl•A--i distance away. She suited her registration should 1.--c in the glovol-_,Lix of her nat di not. know the male, aid that she never gave him enter hcr vehicle_ 1 1ciriiriJ the suspect about the ro,,-=istrahon and he star 1-1...11-„,e,...,:arne. cold as he walked down P,roa...1).vay inside the vehicle to warrn lip. When I i tlic re.tTiqr [Lion otn gloych4:0.:, if he only sat in the vehicle to warm up, he shrugged his ..shotikkrs and didn't anc 1 Hc mi tispcct was transported and booked into the Spokane County h1.11. for Vehicle Prowling 2Thd De1,21-0_.... Attempted Vehicle Prowling 2nd Degree and Obstructing. After Arrest, No One Claims Money Found in Vehkh-irieilrI-5 November, Spokan,.. Sncri CF:,: Deputy Clay Hilton loca.ted over a iLoir-:nikl i3;ter [Ii.,. driver for While Suspended 3rd Degree and 0• :- a C,ontrolleti Subsiance-Cocaire. everyone in this.' vehicle denied ownership °film CI LI IL W11,0 il 1)C1G11i.2.Cd to, it VVii.'S 11%1111.:Cd into evid.:nce for saiAcening, The incident began api-::.\irrately 12:45 ain., when Del -HAL,' I I rAon obser.y.ed a Saturn that had no 'visible license j ics and driver's side window fail to IN: tio piiLI n the area of Havana and Pacific, Deputy 1-1ihoo !-Thoppeil the vehicle and contacted the 611 ..L1 oI'i,...1.rtver identified by a Washington State ID card. Thc d.(1],.'L have a :11:1 a records check confirmed his driving privilegi..7:-; wore suspended. 1)epiit:y-1Iiltori arres,Jxl 1h o:de 16r Dri ving While Suspended, placed him lit hindcutTs and began a SiICFL of his person. Drviir2 Deputv Hilton located a olear plastic ;:.oritaining an off -vine rock subs.L Icci i1i2 IT. 7.11S A., which he believed to be crack eocairie„ Deputy Hilton completed the :eh. in his patrol vd-..icle Lind field-testcd the substance, which showed. a presumptk e positive result Dcputy l-iilton caritacted the male and advised him of his r4,1its. .A,s Deputy Hilton spoke ...vith the suspoe',. about the crack cocainehe claimed he was. only stoppc.-..c1 [,Lime or1ii race. He also made seve-ral derogatory comments toward Deputy Hilton after t Lij ki1L c1od:. for o while. During on inventory search of the vehicle, Deputy Hilton Lioa:ed c'ti LI tlioar,Liiid dioLarsiii cash inside an open Doritos bag_ When asked about the money, neither the nThie :-:i_Kpeci nor his passenger (]Aided ownership of the funds ind could not tell Deputy Hilton to whicTi Ilio rnmk, h•Ll{ingccl. With no one c1iniiri the moncy or `.)rovid.ing information about to lioi thc up.}ney bciongQ(1. 11 \vas placed into for salekettlin2,. The male suspect was 1!-11-_•_,,portod and hooked into the Spokane Count,, Pussessior. 1 i Controlled Substance - Elie Drivi w!ii I e. License Suspended, 'Citizen's 1Z0011 lielps Catch .11Iturgiar "In Ite Aet"— In aild-Nov„2..mT_ -Valley Sheriff's Doptiuy• Andrew 1 lairsion rt,•Tondecl to a citizens report of a male i 1- inio the Sports AuthorAy jou:led oi 1 5 1 1 East Indiana. Deputy 1.-Inirs•tor rnili. iIcio 'find A 1....car-old male rcaching Lill oth the Ly.:oh.eir L2,ass door of the. business. 1 he ,,A.i.s71,ect tV11Ai rt. --_e(1 Lew 13urglary 1)cgree and Ell' ()Llt Fngitive. Li in Arkansas wa.rrant. 1Lii incident= bean just prior to 10:00 p.m., 6ti7C11 calicd and reporicd -witnessing the mak' sinus] the glass door with a trash Cart. The maIe originally caught the ciiEven's attention Vdler Stie 1101 iced lin,' into vehicles in the parkiiig lot and acting suspiiou. hy p..cin., in front of cloAtd hirNines's...-:s. fief.- Heir -EL, advised of his rights. 1he male suspect spoke to Deputy liiiEn-mm and admitted to int0 lhe store to "suit up," due 10 some happcning 111 Thc male sud who app...-arLil to possibly be under the i I ." gave a nonsensical. story ,tbout his aoioiv,_ 'rut he said (....ne of the reasons was t;', have law enforeement resmond. The suspect was hooked irtio ihe Spokane County Jail for the iicqed above. -11.1.:2. Arkansas warrant ILLcd tor PlOrkn'l 0,1. in between $5,000 - S25,01)0 dollars. The damage to the store was estimated to be approximately $1,000. Fleeing Driver Not So Lucky this' Time - On tor:171. in ill id:Nlovern !--;.1)1)1,-.arie Valley Sheri [Is Do.ptity Todd Miller arced 24-year-o1cl mak.. a Ilet le pi irsuii and ',.bot chase. The male suspect boaAeLl for 10 when he I lcdUc it Ic tho qtr.. worth a chancr: ilik time. The suspect. hooked for Lludiro,....„. Sffipendcd 7141! Deliree, Failure to an interlock Device, 11i 'ird Run tre.4. IL, ineident •approNimatery 12. Dcp, 01.",i;.. :1HiLk Li -d ..\:1u-Aartg on 1 inivcrsity new: 4iii \.21 -Ric in Spekalle !-Teed. at 5Cininh in posioj yolk- acid kvith radar the vellicH!... 1142 LI I olbservc-d it doll sideto side and the iurb. DcruLy 41,..ts to stop the vehicle alid contact the male driver. 1-ne :male suspect sloixed, activatco Iii mint ui1 turned east on 6th. The. male almost stopped, but suddenly ae(;L.:Iaated widly down :hie [lead- cud .:;;-reet. Once at the dead- end, the male slammed on the brak, but was unable to stop before the kl.',.'ad-cnd. He left the roadway, narrowly missed a tree, and t1:- ugh a wooden fence bel]v backyard of a residence. He then jumped out (i1' vchicle and started to 16)t. Dcputv Miller identified himself, told the reale to stop avid F 'in udder !Arrest, but the moli.:.. L7',1111:11_1C1 to 110e. The male suspect began. reaching toward his WEti::C.-K1,111 iC Mil 17nsure if the male had a weapon, Deputy Miller drew his weapon as he told th..KiTect halds. -shoot me," as he willfully failed to follow cot -Jamul& aund tried running Cron, Deputy Mil la. Miller found the male sus.' ket hiding behind a shed arid, with the assistance ofuddi 1J 1.entities, sir':.pect was taken into cin.;tody without further incident. The male saiL: he didn 1 1 .1;ive dad was holding his swell -Inuits up while he ran. A bag i:onlitininp.iiirij Lana was ioca,ed in.s...ve...,..tpants' pocket and a strong odor of an ihu Lo bc,.crage emitted Iin Iii hrcath. The male slispeet coi.npained of an injured knee and was transp...?.ried to a local. hospital ler rnedical treatment. A. sonrik orl-ii:4; blood was tukenror tcsiiIl.e!. after a search ele:.:tred at was tranToricd ;And kloked ii Ito 11.1:2 Jail For the above listed clitrues. ********g*********** Page 9 sv Crime Report Date Range: 11/1/2015 to 11130/2015 Year To EYate Totals: Full Year Totals: November- November- 2015 -YTD 201441-D 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 20t5 2014 BURGLARY 78 82 919 1,43 1,167 1,079 L,010 997 915 713 FORGERY 48 52 561 616 653 693 527 ,10 341 297 MAL MISCHIEF 132 138 1„511 1,454 1r645 1,624 1,/I,1 1 :,4:. 1,177 1,129 NON -CRIMINAL 12 11 115 141 151 105 1!?7 :CSC: 913 883 PROP OTHER 104 114 1,446 1,329 1,449 1,463 1,'.'. • 1 1'-1 355 8138 RCIWO VEH 31 39 353 433 464 531 293 186 STL V EH 37 55 456 531 573 595 !,,,i', 1-: 293 Tf4EFT 215 239 2,793 2,822 3,096 3,105 "r+ ::,3r.;! -r, 2,169 VE'I OTHER 17 18 185 240 279 263 7.-:7 :111 5 VEH PROWL 93 105 1,071 1,051, 1,19$ 1,205 1.,160 .:: ;; 1,395 920 TOTAL PROPERTY CRIMES 767 853 9,417 3,700 10,679 14,679 10,091 4.3.1; 8,731 7.489 ASSAULT 86 84 983 1,005 1,087 902 E91 r.-', BAn 900 DCA/SUICIDE 22 13 248 206 222 218 7::,;I :°06 188 209 DV 63 59 624 435 485 386 10 4'.;3 1,141 1.245 HOMICIDE 0 1 1 3 3 2 2 1 3 1;1[MAP 0 3 25 40 41 2.4 16 11 111 21 1ENTA4 25 31 343 280 307 268 2711 162 1x;3 310 10.P 12 16 173 175 138 156 154 124 115 PF RS OTHER 245 249 3,151 2,934 3,203 2,976 2,401 2,372 I.,iii3 1,563 RCJIA;f RY 3 11 77 27 94 R8 74 59 67 Ery f x..11 100 ASS 3 10 106 122 132 144 212 262 153 1SS TOTAL M JOI. CRIMES 459 477 5,769 5,237 5,712 5,163 5,172 4,647 4,464 4,511 CC.1i RAPT 6 4 73 54 70 64 75 62 44 35 C11ILL1ARUSF 2 3 28 41 42 2.5 27 56 115 159 i.:115'1 IV f F F F1 L0 24 175 221 237 235 190 184 206 1$7 up 113L .IY 0 3 25 26 29 20 27 17 8 10 `TILS'-E5;'i.ilrli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 47 32 •tt,l'EICH,: (1 3 1 13 10 13 15 13 23 28 35 84.)11,^,'.v,^,Y 35 39 393 376 406 397 530 510 490 440 5='x OTI-ER 7 4 61 54 69 45 37 56 215 211 SEX oEGIS F 0 0 2 0 0 4 8 2 1 2 STALKING 0 4 16 19 24 21 24 19 18 15 SUSP PERSON 45 64 551 563 604 44(1 423 340 215 174 TOTAL SEX CRIMES 108 146 1,340 1,395 1,494 1,266 1,354 1,2,57 1,327 1,270 DRUG LSU OTHER TOTAL OF 30 24 350 303 336 314 4N 511 534 565 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 30 24 350 308 336 314 424 513 536 666 TRAFFIC 298 329 3,120 2,943 3,216 3,52.5 3,957 3,564 3,081 3483 TOTAL TRAFFIC REPORTS 298 329 3,130 2,943 3,216 3,525 3,957 3,599 3,051 3,183 TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1,662 1,229 711,(356 19,373 21,436 20,943 20,993 19,361 18,199 17,119 Prlr,ted 12/101+2015 331:73 C0.1 Rritgl 1. Page 1 cll. . RMS Crimes by Cities (Only incidents handed by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) D ate Range: 11f1/2015 to 11{30/2015 AH CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW Rrwona I In to I I]gc.'FLC'(rou I]9 R£ SCD SPA 5PK N WAV TOTS BURGLARY FORGERY MAL MISCHIEF 061-0R1 MIMAL PROP OTHER RCRVD VEH STLVEH THEFT VEH OTHER VEH PROWL TOTAL PROPERTY CR1MEs O 0 6 0 0 0 2 4 4 0 67 0 1 78 0 153. 3 0 4 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 63 0 3 48 0 124 4 2 8 0 1 0 2 2 2 0 115 0 0 132 0 266 O 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 3 0 1 12 0 17 30 9 6 3 0 0 8 4 2 0 E8 0 16 104 0 250 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 14 0 6 31 0 55 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 12 0 0 37 0 52 30 0 8 1 4 0 3 5 3 2 115 1 0 215 0 383 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 ❑ 7 0 U 17 0 24 4 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 73 0 0 93 0 173 82 11 32 4 1 0 21 15 12 2 537 1 27 767 9 1,514 ASSAULT 4 0 2 9 9 9 1 7 0 1 52 0 2 SE 0 155 D OAISUICIDE 2 1 1 9 1 0 2 1 0 0 21 0 0 22 ❑ 51 D V 16 0 2 0 1 9 3 1 0 0 35 0 1 63 9 122 MENTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 0 0 2.5 a 47 MP 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 7 0 D 12 D 20 PERS OTHER 13 7 10 0 1 0 9 6 3 1 192 0 15 245 9 502 ROBBERY 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 3 D 10 TEL -HARASS 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 5 0 0 3 0 10 TOTAL MAJOR CRIMES 36 8 17 0 3 0 15 15 4 2 339 0 1B 459 0 917 ADULT FLAP CHILD ABUSE CUSTIh1TFER RAPE/C H I LO RUNAWAY SEAS OT1-1ER SEx REGIS F SUSP PERSON TOTAL S EX CRIMES DRUG TOTAL ITF TRAFFIC TOTAL TRAFFIC UI90C TOTAL OTHER TOTAL REPORTS RECEIVED 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 4 0 0 6 0 13 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 2 O d 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 27 1 0 10 0 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 0 0 35. 0 68 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 18 O 0 ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 7 0 1 0 0 0 6 6 1 0 29 0 10 45 0 105 3 0 4 0 0 0 6 10 2 0 48 1 12 108 0 250 1 7 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 0 17 30 0 66 1 2 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 0 17 30 0 6E 17 1 1 0 0 9 8 5 3 0 190 0 56 298 ❑ 595 17 1 6 0 0 0 8 6 3 0 190 0 66 298 0 595 O 0 {7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 145 22 61 4 4 0 52 48 21 4 1,177 2 140 1,663 0 3,343 Mood 12/9/2015 3:11:54 PM Page 1 of 1 GAD Incidents by Cities (Only incidents handled by Spokane County Sheriff's Office) Date Range: 11/1/2015 to 11/30/2015 Razor -hal Intelligence Group 9 A11 CH DP FC FF LAH LL ML MW Rf SCO SPA SPK SV WAV TOTALS CAD Incidents Self initiated Incidents Drug Self Int (Patrol) Traffic Stops Traffic Stops (ARST/CIT/IN) T5 (Warrants) Calls for Service Alarms Accidents Accidents (ARREST/CIT} Drug Calls DV DUI DUI (Arrest( Pursuits Su s piclous Ac ivIty Vet icle Recovered 911 Abandari tine Shoplifting All Arrests {ARREST/C1T/IN} Crime Check Reports 27 166 207 12 11 0 28 181 75 9 3,564 5 684 4,919 0 9,788 21 40 109 7 2 0 19 115 24 0 1,137 1 574 1,715 0 3,764 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 3 0 10 2 15 34 0 0 0 12 35 14 0 488 0 235 1,020 0 1,857 1 3 7 0 0 0 5 5 3 0 153 0 78 427 0 682 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 n 9 33 0 53 6 126 93 5 9 0 9 56 51 9 2,427 4 110 3,104 0 6,0214 4 1 2 0 0 0 0 5 3 0 155 0 2 133 0 301 O R 4 0 0 0 1 5 6 1 276 0 21 2.52 0 584 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 13 0 19 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 3S 0 47 16 0 5 0 2 0 4 4 1 2 117 1 3 171 0 326 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 71 0 8 67 0 147 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 3 0 0 18 0 21 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2. 4 21 0 1 0 2 9 7 0 459 1 46 503 0 1,055 • 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 17 0 7 28 0 55 O 30 12 3 0 0 0 10 3 1 166 0 14 247 n 403 O 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 51 0 57 7 3 18 4 1 0 5 6 4 0 256 0 104 568 0 1,076 O 0 18 0 1 01 2 12 8 2 443 2 1 520 0 1,009 Priv @cif 12/912015 3:09:15 PM Fol001 Pape] of 1 a Commercial Burglary Low 1111. Medium High 1 2 0 d.i 0 0.75 l.S Miles 1 1 Mau Produced: 10 Dec 2015 Prepared by: 2015 November Commercial Burglary Hotspots Regional intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff enua urglary Low Medium High 1 2 Co 0 4+ d 1175 1.5 Hiles I � I Map Producetl: IC Dei 20L5 2015 November R ;kilenti . u r Dar; H rreparell By: 0 ts p antsRegional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Shei iF[ Stolen Vehicles Low ® Med urn High 1 2 p s9 74 €.5 [files I Map Produced: 10 Dec 20 15 2015 October & November Stolen Vehicle Hotspots Prepared By. Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff Low in Medium High 1 2 0 3 0 4+ u 0.75. 13 Nfiles 1__• 1 Map Produced 10 Dec 2015 2015 November Vehicle Prowfing Hotspots repare. ;y Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sheriff Mission 1 29r Is 10 Traffic Collisions Low Medium Low ® Medium ® High Prepared By: Regional Intelligence Group 9 Spokane County Sherift 01 1 Mals Produced° IO Dec 701 S 5 November Traffic CoNskm botspots Selected Data for Comparisons RMS StatsfCharts Spokane Valley Spokane Valley Dispatched Calls Regional Intelligence Group 9 February January March April May June July August September October NOVCnIt]9r December 2012 2013 - 2014 - 2015 January February March Aprlt May June July August September October November December 2012 24-43 2253 2622 2805 2890 2861 3450 3365 3029 2845 2047 2714 2013 2746 2383 2382 2923 3166 3195 3491 3529 3127 3016 2753 2773 21,14 2702 2550 2992 2935 3359 3291 3847 3593 3279 3069 2715 2884 2015 2905 2658 3209 2971 3473 31539 3920 3817 3552 3675 3104 F tinted 12/8/2015 3:18:20 PM Prcte 7 of 213 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 350 -- 300 250 200 150 100 50 Regional Intelligence ron]) Spokane Valley Person Crimes February January March April May June July August September October November December =2412 .2413 2014 2415 January February March April May June July August Septambar October November December 2012 293 267 260 235 2100 252 283 269 251 248 206 248 2013 223 180 213 255 248 255 278 278 249 243 251 243 2014 270 225 265 273 260 274 335 331 323 286 200 279 2015 301 248 285 261 318 330 348 313 272 272 253 Prli-ted 12rgd2a15 3:1€:20 PM PpI007 Page 156-28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley Spokane Valley Property gimes Regional Intelligence Group 9 February January March April May June July August Octaber September td6wernbbr December — 2012 - 2013 elms 2414 +� 2015 January February March AprIl May June July August September October November December 2012 645 498 502 609 671 Fi2h 1197 775 725 773 681 699 2013 717 599 729 671 634 634 697 710 695 817 714 659 2014 632 578 758 665 717 705 727 665 755 653 671 778 2015 705 575 644 566 633 626 666 709 700 733 Boa Prin€ed 1 219/201 5 3:15:20110 R pt047 Page 17 of 28 Selected data for Comparisons RMS Stats)Charts - Spokane Valley Spokane Valley Self Initiated Incidents 1,1kzional Int+:Aiuuct,, jrnL p 4 February January March April May June July August September October November December 2012 2013 2014 imetk 2015 January February March AO I May June July August September October November December 2012 1980 1998 2175 2125 1809 1716 1883 1891 1519 2116 1848 1639 2013 1638 1881 2015 1696 1639 1745 2094 1682 1477 1766 1660 1512 2614 2126 1707 1831 1763 1899 1903 2096 1863 1826 1802 1794 1723 2015 1923 1795 2036 2001 1606 1838 2073 2003 1958 2072 1715 Printed 12/9/2016 3:18:20 PM [ pt007 Paye 20 r 128 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/charts - Spokane Valley Spokane Valley Crime Sex Crimes kczgirrnul Irrt�lligerrr.r Grout 9 February January March April May June July August September October Noverneer December - 2012 - 2013 - 2014 .win 2015 January February March April May June July August September October November Cucumber 201 37 13 21 24 30 34 46 33 35 31 27 33 2013 24 23 26 21 44 41 36 3? 32 29 33 38 2014 26 38 41 43 42 25 26 33 34 36 39 33 2015 36 38 26 23 42 27 45 32 22 25 21 Frinleit 1r't9re,t)1ti 3:16:20 PM KplODI Paye 22 cif 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - 5pokare Valley 140 120 100 — 80 — 60- 40 — 20 — Rr1i[]r111 Intollfgoncr= Group 9 Spokane Valley Traffic Collisions February Januer}, March April May June July August October September INovembur December 2412 T -26313 mom 2014 2015 January February March April May June July August September October November December 2012 102 82 83 76 98 79 98 90 91 07 94 122 2013 120 69 92 79 90 107 87 98 97 76 114 128 2014 100 105 83 65 103 82 93 90 105 112 116 95 2015 105 76 110 102 1013 127 103 103 124 94 131 F'ruiLeel 1%P -tri t1ti 3.18,_20 PM Rtrt{ }7 Paye 27 of 28 Selected Data for Comparisons RMS Stats/Charts - Spokane Valley 1600 — 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 Regional Intelligence Group 9 Charge Count from Tickets; Spokane Valley January February March April May June July August Octot3e September NovernLer IJecernber 2012 2013 - 2014 - 2015 January February March April May Jude Jury August September October November December 2012 1459 11143 1297 1400 1141 1262 1239 1199 839 1273 1072 886 X013 901 1)86 1135 995 978 1226 1290 970 757 1076 948 827 2014 1215 1300 917 9E9 1130 111❑ 1242 998 1054 843 866 881 2015 988 895 1006 1054 764 973 985 1019 1125 954 807 Printed 12/J12O15 3:18:20 PM 14p007 Page 2€3 a1 25 SpUk ine 1 .� Val ley PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MONTHLY REPORT November 2015 AGREEMENTS FOR SERVICES ADOPTED AND IN OPERATION Contract Name Contractor Contract Total % of Expended as Contract Amount of 11/31/15 Expended Street Maintenance Poe Asphalt $1,366,663.00 $1,314,592.18 96.19% Street Sweeping AAA Sweeping $490,199.94 $482,393.22 98.41% Storm Drain Cleaning AAA Sweeping $189,990.00 $189,712.13 99.85% Snow Removal Poe Asphalt $40,000.00 $5,792.62 14.48% Landscaping Senske $53,250.00 $49,124.66 92.25% Emergency Traffic Control Senske $10,000.00 $6,555.74 65.56% Litter and Weed Control Geiger Work Crew $60,000.00 $47,419.61** 79.03% State Highway Maintenance WSDOT $265,000.00 $139,538.52 52.66% Traffic Signals, Signs, Striping Spokane County $582,000.00 $442,906.16 76.10% Dead Animal Control Brad Southard $20,000.00 $15,818.00 79.09% * Budget estimates ** Does not include November 2015 — waiting on invoices Citizen Requests 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Citizen Requests for Public Works • Submitted • In Progress Total Citizen Requests: Public Works 276 41 Misc Requests Dead Animal Removal Roadway Hazard Street Sweeping Sign & Storm Signal Drainage Requests /Erosion Traffic Requests 0 18 126 1 89 41 1 0 0 7 0 0 34 0 ■ Resolved 235 0 18 119 1 89 7 1 *Information in bold indicates updates 1 WASTEWATER Status of the process can be monitored at: http://www.spokaneriver.net/, http://www.ecy.wa.qov/geographic/spokane/spokane river basin.htm, http://www.spokanecounty.orq/utilities/WaterReclamation/content.aspx?c=2224 and http://www.spokaneriverpartners.com/ STREET MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY The following is a summary of Public Works/Contractor maintenance activities in the City of Spokane Valley for November 2015: • AAA Sweeping continued arterial maintenance sweeping. • AAA Sweeping continued with vector operations cleaning drywells. • Poe Asphalt Maintenance Contract — Asphalt Repairs at 4th Avenue east of Pines, 10th and McDonald, 6th Avenue east of Farr, Farr Road at 4th, Progress Road north of Sprague, Dollar Road north of Trent and 36th and Woodruff. • The Geiger crew mowed dryland grass locations and disposed of 6,9401bs.of litter and debris from our rights of way. STORMWATER UTILITY The following is a summary of Stormwater Utility activities in the City of Spokane Valley for November 2015: • Worked on updating Stormwater Utility Fee Rolls. • Began work on updating swale inventory and information in GIS, as well as entering stormwater structure information into the GIS system for new 2015 developments and projects. • Assisted with Windstorm 2015 response including providing maps of trees down and extension of contracted sweeping services. • Started work on service contract renewals that are funded primarily by the stormwater management fund 402. • Continued work on an internal review of the City's Stormwater Program to prepare for probable future audit by the State. • Continued work on various capital improvement projects, (see below). Worked on negotiating grant agreements with Ecology on several projects including, Sprague LID, University to Park; Decant Phase 3; and Stormwater Retrofits with Pavement Preservation Projects. Received notification of pending awards for Ecology Grant funding of "Stormwater Green Retrofit Pre -Construction Planning and Design" for the following locations: • $140,000 for Appleway Stormwater Improvements, Farr to University (PE Only) $100,000 for Chester Creek Diversions, Bowdish to Schafer (PE Only) *Information in bold indicates updates 2 CAPITAL PROJECTS Spokane 4.000 Valley. Public Works Projects Monthly Summary - Design & Construction November -15 Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety 0201 ITS Infill Project- Phase 1 0207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access Imp 0234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 0236 Fancher Road Bridge #3502 Joint Repair 0237 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin Street Preservation Projects 0226 Appleway Resurfacing, Park to Dish man Mica 0233 Broadway Ave Street Pres -Sullivan to Moore Traffic Projects 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates 0228 Transportation Management Center Parks Projects 0227 Appleway S.U.P. - Pines to Evergreen Other Projects 0176 Appleway Trail FHWA - BR HSIP FHWA - CMAQ STA - FTA/NF CDBG COSV COSV/State/DOC 06/27/14 04/22/16 02/26/16 03/11/16 02/05/16 02/26/16 03/03/17 07/18/14 05/13/16 03/11/16 03/25/16 02/26/16 03/11/16 03/24/17 100 45 09/30/16 95 0 10/01/16 50 0 12/31/16 O 0 12/31/16 2 0 12/31/16 100 0 06/01/16 O 0 12/31/17 $ 15,833,333 $ 733,086 $ 327,562 $ 85,000 $ 389,987 $ 160,000 $ 2,130,000 FHWA-STP(U) 01/02/17 01/02/17 5 0 12/31/17 $ 1,190,000 COSV 02/19/16 03/11/16 HSIP HSIP COSV O 0 12/31/16 $ 450,000 07/31/15 08/21/15 100 tbd tbd 0 Local agency work 100 80 07/31/16 0 03/01/19 85 12/31/15 $ 503,424 $ 81,000 $ 45,000 FHWA-STP(U) 01/12/18 02/02/18 0 0 12/31/18 $ 1,899,252 COSY 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 98 04/29/16 $ 1,605,400 Design & Construction $ 25,433,044 Design Bid Estimated Total Project Proposed Open % Complete Construction Project # Design & Construction Projects Funding Ad Date Date PE I CN Completion Cost Street Projects 0155 Sullivan Rd W Bridge Replacement#4508 0166 Pines Rd. (SR27) & Grace Ave. Int Safety 0201 ITS Infill Project- Phase 1 0207 Indiana & Evergreen Transit Access Imp 0234 Seth Woodard Sidewalk Improvements 0236 Fancher Road Bridge #3502 Joint Repair 0237 Appleway Trail - Sullivan to Corbin Street Preservation Projects 0226 Appleway Resurfacing, Park to Dish man Mica 0233 Broadway Ave Street Pres -Sullivan to Moore Traffic Projects 0167 Citywide Safety Improvements 0222 Citywide Reflective Signal Back Plates 0228 Transportation Management Center Parks Projects 0227 Appleway S.U.P. - Pines to Evergreen Other Projects 0176 Appleway Trail FHWA - BR HSIP FHWA - CMAQ STA - FTA/NF CDBG COSV COSV/State/DOC 06/27/14 04/22/16 02/26/16 03/11/16 02/05/16 02/26/16 03/03/17 07/18/14 05/13/16 03/11/16 03/25/16 02/26/16 03/11/16 03/24/17 100 45 09/30/16 95 0 10/01/16 50 0 12/31/16 O 0 12/31/16 2 0 12/31/16 100 0 06/01/16 O 0 12/31/17 $ 15,833,333 $ 733,086 $ 327,562 $ 85,000 $ 389,987 $ 160,000 $ 2,130,000 FHWA-STP(U) 01/02/17 01/02/17 5 0 12/31/17 $ 1,190,000 COSV 02/19/16 03/11/16 HSIP HSIP COSV O 0 12/31/16 $ 450,000 07/31/15 08/21/15 100 tbd tbd 0 Local agency work 100 80 07/31/16 0 03/01/19 85 12/31/15 $ 503,424 $ 81,000 $ 45,000 FHWA-STP(U) 01/12/18 02/02/18 0 0 12/31/18 $ 1,899,252 COSY 08/22/14 09/09/14 100 98 04/29/16 $ 1,605,400 Design & Construction $ 25,433,044 Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 0221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) COSV HSIP COSV 03/17/17 12/31/17 01/30/16 12/31/16 06/30/16 tbd FHWA - CMAQ 07/31/15 FHWA-STP(U) 07/31/15 Dept of Ecology 06/30/15 Dept of Ecology 03/01/16 Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 15 80 90 5 0 0 98 90 100 30 35 35 $ 517,919 $ 175,260 $ 276,301 $ 51,619 $ 616,000 $ 10,000 $ 249,711 $ 200,000 300,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Design only $ 2,456,810 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 Design Total Project Complete % Complete Project # Design Only Projects Funding Date PE Cost Street Projects 0123 Mission Ave - Flora to Barker 0141 Sullivan & Euclid PCC 0142 Broadway @ Argonne/Mullan 0205 Sprague/Barker Intersection Improvement 0221 McDonald Rd Diet (16th to Mission) 0223 Pines Rd Underpass @ BNSF &Trent Traffic Projects 0159 University Road Overpass Study 0177 Sullivan Road Corridor Traffic Study Stormwater Projects 0193 Effectiveness Study 0198 Sprague, Park to University LID 0199 Havana -Yale Diversion 0200 Ponderosa Surface Water Diversion FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) FHWA - STP(U) COSV HSIP COSV 03/17/17 12/31/17 01/30/16 12/31/16 06/30/16 tbd FHWA - CMAQ 07/31/15 FHWA-STP(U) 07/31/15 Dept of Ecology 06/30/15 Dept of Ecology 03/01/16 Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 Dept of Ecology 10/31/16 15 80 90 5 0 0 98 90 100 30 35 35 $ 517,919 $ 175,260 $ 276,301 $ 51,619 $ 616,000 $ 10,000 $ 249,711 $ 200,000 300,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 Design only $ 2,456,810 *Information in bold indicates updates 3 TRAFFIC CIP Projects Staff continues to coordinate with traffic related design and study items as part of CIP projects. Materials for the pedestrian signal replacement portion of the Citywide Safety Project have been ordered and installation could begin this fall. Finalizing materials for the signing portion of the project. Specific Studies Staff is coordinating with the consultant to wrap up the University Overpass Study. Staff obtained the final Sullivan Road Corridor Study. Development Projects Reviewing traffic impact studies and letters for several projects and assisting Development Engineering with the Comprehensive Plan Update. PLANNING AND GRANTS Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) - 2015 Call for Projects On June 1, 2015, the Washington State Transportation Improvement Board (TIB) issued a 2015 Call for Projects for allocation of funding for the Urban Arterial Program (UAP) and Urban Sidewalk Program (SP). The City submitted five projects and on November 22, 2015 the City was notified by TIB that three were selected as summarized here: Agency Program Project Name TIB Funds Project Cost SPOKANE VALLEY Sidewalk Program Bowdish Road Sidewalk, 12th to 8th Ave, 11th from Bowdish $283,430 $506,342 Urban Arterial Program McDonald Road Preservation, 16th to $1,237,630 $1,853,630 Pines Road (SR 27) Mirabeau Parkway Intersection $357,069 $446,338 In addition, staff has been working with the WA State Department of Commerce to develop a contract for the Legislative Direct Appropriations of $1 M for the Appleway Trail, Sullivan to Corbin project. *Information in bold indicates updates 4