Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-189-79
r1 ~ w1 f SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT r Zone Reclassification Checklist Annlfcant's Name Addres& Telephone No-. A2nlicant's 029 f,=~~, ~6(/~ Aw-, INTTIM-S Ive PRE APPLICATION FEE, ($10.00),, RECEIPT NUMBER OZ9t53 _ (date) APPLICATION APPOINTMENT (date) (time) PART-j ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP. ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership. ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION. ZONING WORKSHEET. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. PLOT PLANS (5 blackline) - (setbacks, road frontage, square footage, open space). PLOT PLAN TO GRAPHICS 4 ed h ( ate) PHOTOS (8 x 10 and description) SIGNS (4' x 4') APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER r'17 f ( ate) TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPES, ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT (date) STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FINDINGS PREPARED (date) POST SURROUNDING AREA (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED (date) MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) FINDINGS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PABZML HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUID MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) S EPA's Notice of Action Q s I S f v S P O K A N E C O U N T - y-BUILDING AND PLANNING - A DwmoN OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT JAMEs L MANsom C B 0, DiRWMR DENm M Scow, P.E., DIRECPOR Friday, October 31, 1997 Mark Lucas Klemle & Hagood Company 601 W Main, Suite 400 Spokane, WA 99201 RE ZE-189-79 Dear Mark, This letter is a follow-up on our phone conversation of October 23, 1997 regarding file # ZE-189-79 On September 16, 1997 you and I met in my office for a preconference and to discuss the above referenced file At that time, I told you that a public hearing was required per condition (f) of the Hearing Examiner Committee Findings and Order dated November 20, 1979 prior to issuance of any building permit Subsequent discussions with the Hearing Examiner on this protect resulted in the determination that a public hearing is not required for review of a specific development plan Instead, you are required to submit a specific development plan of the entire subject property prior to the issuance of any building permit for the subject property The development plan is to be reviewed administratively for compliance with the conditions of approval of the Zone Reclassification and the Spokane County Zoning Code Thank you for your cooperation and understanding in this matter Don't hesitate to call if you have any questions Sincerely, zk I 64k Louis Webster, AICP c Laurie Grimes, Assistant Planning Director c Jeff Forry, Senior Building Technician c Phil Hams, County Commissioner 1026 WEST BROADWAY AVENUE - SPOKANE, WASIHNGTON 99260 PHONE. (509) 456-3675 - FAx (509) 456-4703 TDD (509) 324-3166 K MAE& HAGOOD C O M P A N Y gi. October 2, 1997 Mr Phil Hares Spokane County Commissioner West 1116 Broadway Spokane, WA 99260 RE Zone change # ZE-189-79 Dear Phil This letter is in reference to the above captioned zone change, in which I was a hearing examiner committee member, as evidenced by my signature on the approval of the zone change, which I have attached to this letter for your reference It has come to my attention that the developers of the property are being required to submit a Site Plan for the development of the property under the public hearing process similar to that of the zone change It was not the intent by the hearing examiner committee members to ever require a public hearing to review the site plans once development plans had been sohchfied. The intent was only to insure the integrity of the project by allowing the staff to administratively review the specific development plan of the property It was not our intent to add to the cost, development time or to duplicate the procedure for the development of the property In other words, what is the purpose of going through a zone change procedure only to have this effort duplicated once a site plan has been submitted As I understand, the developer would like to construct a medical office building for a kidney dialysis center, which is clearly a permitted use and the R-0 zone under which the property was rezoned in 1979, and also permitted use under the UR22 zone in which the property has crossed over to under the matrix The proposed occupant is from a company outside the Spokane area and it would be a shame to lose this valued service to the community, not to mention the added tax base I would appreciate your best effort to have the sight plan administratively reviewed by staff in order that this project get under way This letter is not an effort to shortcut the system, but only to uphold the original intent of the zone change If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call Sincerely, IGEMU & HAGOOD COMPANY td--~ hv~puv Jane Myers /af G 1BMTSMPMAPUUSJM Professional Real Estate Services Washington Mutual Financial Center, West 601 Main Avenue, Suite 400, Spokane, Washington 99201-0674 (509) 838-6541 FAX (509) 458-4014 a • ile No. ZE-189-79 10 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 20, 1979, (being a continuance of the November 15, 1979 hearing) and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane Myers, and Ted McCoury and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Michael Kirk, representing sponsor and Tom Marxson of Medicus for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural to Residential Office for the purpose of (no proposal at this time). B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is Agricultural. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion. 7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 1 'Ile No. ZE-189-79 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapprov- al of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Medicus General Partnership for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be approved. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion : a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the byilding shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 3. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be sub- mitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Nora Avenue and/or applicant must be a willing participant in any future Local Improvement District (LID), Road Improvement District (RID), or County Road Project (CRP). 2. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 2 w • ile No. ZE-189-79 3. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. ` 4. An engineering review for access onto Nora Avenue or Houk Road will be made by Spokane County Engineer's Office when a specific site plan is filed by the developer. c) WATER PURVEYOR ~cc~ 1. Purveyor Is Modern Elec 'c Water Company and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 2. The zone reclassification has been found to be environmentally non- significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. 3. The specific development plan for this zone reclassification shall be subject to all of the provisions of SEPA, Chapter 43.21C RCW when submitted to the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits« 3 "~`J IMA s~ L g12 Q. 5 9C r c. B-3 63 , 0 ft'2 2 14 _ W.03 I - 820 Y loop ~~.z' I 174P. N 10 - n 6 ~1 . 210.05 ti /Z.50 ® 1 2 ~ OAM O\p iSa s + A~•+'- l _ X40 -176C z U . ~ - i 4f _ - - V - - - - - - 60 2-i - ~F~► 3#0 rcc1 I I r~~~ 78 1.2 53 V3 1 ~ I 3-76)' 23A-75C I 502 I I I I I Al 450 4 --~j .f <f o V)1 i , B=2 I - 93 I 4-24-42 C92 10,2 2. L .~1 L.s I o .sc 189-179C V Ol goo I I 1 I I I 303 1 I I I I 76 7/ z I ( 34.5' I~ I I~ dig ~V 70 o O2G 2 23-950 - 1 q-4 -71 d _ IPA ~,v •<J iwl~ .a , I - 14 42 • ~ . 15 _$9C „ ~ g )c/j t~ 63 t !4 O 2 ~ ( 11.820 100 ~r©~ r ' s- to ¢ . o7B-.. - -7 ail/ .I 210.05 t- it .So - ~ ~ ~ 1 ® to 124.1 ' 3. I-CA f 71 x.41- =-40.176C ~j 1 z lot dc Ic' /fo f~ r ~ w / IJJVJ .2•~ J 147 405j!k~ 6.o-- i_ND/A 3f0 I i~---~ 7 s3 a B-3 Im2 3-76#%k') 23A - 75C 22 '1 20 19 4 NA V)f B=2 1 1 '93 ' 4 - 24 -42 92 ' 91 r - S~ .s n 2 2 / o ' `•s 18 9-179 C IoF 303 f I I i 76 _7 z 1 I 34.5' lip O a o 00 22 23-950 • In _74 IQd4 -71 .le No. ZE-189-79 g) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi- cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance. Motion by: Myers Seconded by: McCoury Vote: Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE • Chairman ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHAR~H Planning Director By: 4 RECEIPT SUMMARY TRANSACTION NUMBER: T9701530 DATE: 09/16/97 APPLICANT: BALL INVESTMENTS PHONE= ADDRESS: P 0 BOX 141449 SPOKANE WA 99214-1449 CONTACT NAME: BALL INVESTMENTS PHONE= 509 249 730 TRANSACTION: ZONE CHANGE PRE-CONFERENCE DOCUMENT ID: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) FEE & PAYMENT SUMMARY ITEM DESCRIPTION QUANTITY FEE AMOUNT PRECON($52):BSP/ZONE/PLAT 1 52.00 TOTAL DUE = 52.00 TOTAL PAID= 52.00 BALANCE OWING= .00 PAYMENT DATE RECEIPT# CHECK# PAYMENT AMOUNT 09/16/97 00008944 2100 52.00 PROCESSED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA PRINTED BY: WENDEL, GLORIA THANK YOU 6~r~ ~tu a VILLAGE SQUARE -A& j. Lucas REALTM' INC. Rob Amsden ~'OR HAGOOD 9731 • 2901 N. Argonne *5 C O M P A N Y P.O. Box 141449 Spokane, WA 99214-1449 P►opertyM-maeffwnt 601 W. Main, Suite 400 Off. 509-924-9730 Saks & Acquisitions -leasing Spokane. WA 99201 Fax. 509-924-9734 Development & Consulting td: (509) 838-6541 Ext. 216 REAL COMMERCIAL ESTATE Fax. (509) 458-4014 REAL AT nrirn • r SPOKANE COUNTY it DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING PRE-CONFERENCE FORM PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE FOR: FILE ❑ PLAT ❑ SHORT PLAT ❑ BINDING SITE PLAN ❑ TEMPORARY USE ❑ VARIANCE ❑ CONDITIONAL USE ❑ ZONE CHANGE ❑ CHANGE OF CONDITIONS OTHER Applicant: qoLrK LUC OL~ PROJECT INFORMATION (Y Parcel number(s): Project location/address: f~ 0 WA- General project description: v UL Type of Access: Comp. Plan category: Or6,-,l SwQp a Disposal Method: Vb ~I Existing Zone: l(~ti' Proposed zone (if rezone Fire District: 1 Proposed land use: School District: CV 30Y4 Proposed # of lots (for plats): Arterial Road Plan: Site size: X : AC Water District: 5CLC. . Cc> Neighborhood Association: ❑ Moran Prairie ❑ Little Spokane River ❑ Gleneden ❑ Other: ❑ Five-Mile Pre-conference form. kjs.7/31/97 Page 1 of 3 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING PRE-CONFERENCE FORM S/TE /NFORMA T/ON PSSA inside Zoutside ❑ ASA inside r utside ❑ IUGA inside a outside ❑ Joint Planning Area? Yes ❑ No /-If s, which y/town? Environmental or cultural resources? Yes No If yes, which type? Designated shoreline area? Yes ❑ fjl6 ~lf yes, which designation? Affected by floodplain? Yes ❑ No d CRITICAL AREAS 1. Wetlands: Yes ❑ No ❑ Category 1 (200 foot minimum buffer) ❑ Category 2 (150 foot minimum buffer) ❑ Category 3 (75 foot minimum buffer) ❑ Category 4 (25 foot minimum buffer) ❑ Unknown Comments: II. Fish and Wildlife Habitat: Yes ❑ No 16 Priority Habitat Species: Water bodies? Yes ❑ No ❑ ❑ Type 1 (200 foot minimum buffer area) ❑ Type 2 (100 foot minimum buffer area) ❑ Type 3 (100 foot minimum buffer area) ❑ Type 4 (50 foot minimum buffer area) ❑ Type 5 (25 foot minimum buffer area) Comments: III. Geologically Hazardous Areas: Yes ❑ No If yes, indicate type of hazard(s) ❑ A slope of 30% or greater ❑ Erodible soils ❑ Hydraulic factors (i.e. existing on-site surface and groundwater) ❑ Prone to landsliding ❑ Area of uncompacted fill ❑ Unstable areas due to rapid stream or stream bank erosion Comments- PRE- CONFERENCE SUMMAR Y Planning Issues (landscaping, buffer areas, land use compatibility, traffic): Pre-confererice form.kis Pa '2of '3 SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF BUILDING AND PLANNING PRE-CONFERENCE FORM Special project requirements (habitat management plan, shoreline permit) 40 General comments: (u- (2& AGENC/ES TO CONTACT You are encouraged to contact the following departments/agencies to obtain information and requirements regarding your proposal. Spokane County ❑ Division of Building and Planning 456-3675 ❑ Division of Utilities 456-3604 Sewer/Water Resources Storm Water ❑ Division of Engineering 456-3600 Drainage Transportation ❑ Division of Long Range Planning 456-2294 ❑ Spokane Regional Health District 324-1560 ❑ Spokane County Parks 456-4730 ❑ Department of Transportation 324-6000 ❑ Department of Ecology 456-2926 ❑ Department of Fish and Wildlife 456-4082 ❑ Fire District No. ❑ Water District No. ❑ Other Agencies: Date: 4 ts- o Staff Planner: Receipt Amount Paid. a.00 Pre-conference form.kjs.7/31/97 Page 3 of 3 Grimes, Laurie From: Grimes, Laurie Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 4:06 PM To: Scott, Dennis; Manson, James Cc: Dempsey, Mike r Su Plan Reviews ZE-189-79) No. I will have Louis call (he did the pre-conference on the site plan). From: Manson, James = Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 3:38 PM To: Scott, Dennis; Grimes, Laurie Cc: Dempsey, Mike Subject: RE: Site Plan Reviews -(ZE-189-79) We should inform the applicant on this specific project of our determination. Has that been done" From: Grimes, Laurie Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 1997 3:35 PM To: Scott, Dennis Cc: Manson, James; Dempsey, Mike Subject: Site Plan Reviews ZE-189-79) Dennis - Jim and I had a discussion this morning about what is happening to the projects that the Hearing Examiner Committee had conditioned with the site plan coming back to the Committee for their review. I explained that the Hearing Examiner had reviewed that specific type of condition of approval and felt that the site plan needed to return to him for a hearing, if the HE Committee condition of approval states that it needed to come back to the committee for public hearing. I have received a copy of a letter from a past member of the HE Committee that states that V was not the intent by the HE Committee members to ever require a public hearing to review the site plans once development plans had been solidified. The intent was only to insure the integrity of the project by allowing the staff to administratively review the specific development plan of the property. It was not our intent to add to the cost, development time or to duplicate the procedure for the development of the property. " The condition that was placed on ZE-189-79 states "The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. " If staff/administrative review was the Committee's intent (and Mike agrees that the site plans should not go back to him for public hearing unless the condition of approval requests that venue), then planning staff will review the proposed site plan for this project, for compliance with all applicable laws, during the building permit application review process. Page 1 Chapter 14.605 RESIDENTLAL ZONES MATH ;4.605.020 Use-Residential 1 4.60.040 Use-Public and Semi-Public .4.605.060 Use-Agriculhw4 Silvicultural, and Agriculture Related 4.605.080 Waxc?f Letters and Symbols 505,020 USE - Redaeaefal RR- 0 SRR-5 SRR-2 SR-1 SR- 1 LTR-3.5 UR- U - 2 .eta residence P(I) P(1) P(1) N N N N N N Lite: ionsing PUD only PUD only PUD only PUD only PUD only PUD only PUD only PUD only PUD only mmunity residential facility 3 or less residents) N N N P P P N N N mmunity residential facWy ;neater than 8 residents, no note then 25 residents) N N N N N N P P P nmunity treatment fedlity 3 or less resident) N N N C.U. C.U. C.U. N N N nmunity treatment ladlity greater than 8 resident, no more than 20 residents) N N N N N N C.U. C.U. C.U. 1ditionalaccessory urdt CU.r1) C.U.(1) C.U.(1) C.U.(1) C.U.(1) C.U.(1) N N N vity bonus (under Chapter 004) N N N PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD PUD dent relative mufactused (mobile) home !8. '306, app 11/28/95) 9 P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) N N N N mi P P P P P P P P P 31ax P P P P P P P P N Solution #1%4W, approved 3/5/96) 40 =go.. sorority P P P P P P P P P .age/storage structure, detached P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) P(1) PM P(1) N N solution #f9s-1104, approved 10/3/95) 40 ne industry C.U- CU. C.U. C.U. C.U. C.U. N N N ne profession P-Aee.(4) F-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Acc.(4) P-Ace.(4) ssehold pets P P P P P P P P P zufactured (mobile) home P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) N N wfactured (mobile) home irk P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) P(2) tihamdy dwelling N N N N N N P P P Chaptet 14.605 Zoning Code Printed; March 1996 Page 54 of Spokane County .n o RR;10, $RRR_5 SRR•2 SR-1 SR- UR-3S UR-7 UR-12 UR-22 Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities, off-site N N N N N N N N N Hazardous waste treatment and storage facilities, tai-site P-Acc.(1) N N N N N N N N Horse boarding and training P P N N N N N N N Horticulture vegetable growing P P P P P-Acc. N N N N Kennel C.U. C.U. N N N N N N N Kennel, private C.U. CU. GU. C.U. C.U. C.U. N N N Nursery - wholesale P P P P N N N N N Orchard P P P P N N N N N Pigeon, performing/show P-Acc-(1) P-Aoc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(1) P-Acc.(I) P-Acc.(1) N N N Riding stable P P N N N N N N N Sawmill and lumber mill P(i) P(1) N N N N N N N a• Transient-egriculturallabor N N N N N N N N N residence Tree fwming P P P N N N N N N H Truck gardening P P P P N N N N N Vineyard P P N N N N N N N Winery C.U. C.U. N N N N N N N Other uses may be permitted pursuant to section 14.604.160 or as determined by the Hearing Body in public hearing as an amendment to the Zoning Code. (Res. 096-0684,7/9/96) 14.605,080 Index of Letteg and Symbols P Permitted use P{1) See Chapters 14.606 (RR-10) thm 14.622 (UR-22) for specific standards for locating and approving these uses. °o P(2) See Chapter 14,805 for required Manufactured (Mobile) Home Development Standards. 0 cs P(3) See Chapter 14.812 fur Solar Development Standards. P(4) See home profession defndtioA. w P-(Ax.) Permitted accessory use w cu. Cond&onal use permit C.U.(1) See Chapter 14.816 a; N Not permitted use 0 (1) Specific standards exist for approving and locating these uses r-. in O I Chapter 14,605 Zoning Code N Punted; March 1996 Page 38 of Spokane Canty ile No. ZE-189-79 w SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 20, 1979, (being a continuance of the November 15, 1979 hearing) and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane Myers, and Ted McCoury and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Michael Kirk, representing sponsor and Tom Marxson of Medicus for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural to Residential Office for the purpose of (no proposal at this time). B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is Agricultural. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion. 7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 1 ile No. ZE-189-79 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapprov- al of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Medicus General Partnership for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be approved. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the byilding shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 3. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be sub- mitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Nora Avenue and/or applicant must be a willing participant in any future Local Improvement District (LID), Road Improvement District (RID), or County Road Project (CRP). 2. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 2 ile No. ZE-189-79 - r 3. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. 4. An engineering review for access onto Nora Avenue or Houk Road will be made by Spokane County Engineer's Office when a specific site plan is filed by the developer. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 2. The zone reclassification has been found to be environmentally non- significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. 3. The specific development plan for this zone reclassification shall be subject to all of the provisions of SEPA, Chapter 43.21C RCW when submitted to the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 3 ile No. ZE-189-79 g) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi- cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance. Motion by: Myers Seconded by: McCoury Vote: Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE , ` Chairman ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: 4 LAW OFFICES _ ' Im c i BASTINE & COOMBS, P.S. 4Q F GOODWILL Iti~~USTA►E E. 12929 Sprague Avenue Spokane, Washington 99216 I p ' LP E ;I.; iJ i : r F' E G Mr. Ken Kirsch Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 LAW OFFICES l iA F BASTINE & COOMBS, P.S. - E. 12929 Sprague Avenue 1 = n 1 Spokane, Washington 99216 Mr. Ken Kirsch Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 County File 2E 189-79 Sec. 10 _ R'ge 44E T sh p 2 5N - { L. _ 1 L I L 1 L' 1 1 1 L_ SPOKANE: COUNTY HEARING EXAMINE u«SUtii'J-I I U i tit rFZu~ IS~vt'~5 uF CH:-;PTt6~ 43.21C KCW, ~dUTICt HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE DID ON NOVEMBER 20, 1979 TAKE THE ACTION DESCRIBCv BELOW. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRO- VISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW. (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED ON 1 / 19 / 80 (30 days from date of 2nd news- I" n i! ry r?' t NOTICE OF WHICH IS HEREBY GIVEN, WAS AS FOLLOWS: (1) APPROVED ACTION: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION REQUEST (2) DESCRIPTION: AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (3) SUCH ACTION PERTAINED TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS AND/OR DESCRIBED AS (street address per general location) : ROAD AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY NORA AVENUE AND ON THE SOUTH BY THE HOUK ROAD CUL-DE-SAC (4) PERTINENT DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING NORMAL COUNTY BUSINESS HOURS AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET, PARTNERSHI I, FILED BY: NAME: MICHAEL A. KIRK TITLE: LAW CLERK / BAST INE & COOMBS, P. I G t`J A T L l R F ATTORNEYS Revised 4/17/79 County File it 2E 189-70 See. 10 R'ge 44E T'shp -25N A.1°1,'.l r) V I `l' 01' f1f)S`I' 1 NG STATE 0F WASI-HINGTON COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) MICHAEL A. KIRK being f first du.l y sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the 3 day of December , 19 79 , I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspi- cuous manner on the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which is the subject of the ACTION, to wit, the following locations; 1 ON PROPERTY FACING NORA AVENUE 2. 3. 4. BATED this _ day of _ December 19 79 SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this 3 day of December 119 79 Nc ary Public in and for the State of Rev: 4/17/71.1 of LAW OFFICES BASTINE s COOMBS, P.S. E. 12929 Sprague Avenue PAUL A. BASTINE ROGER A. COOMBS Spokane. Washington 99218 TELEPHONE ANTHONY E. GRABICKI (509) 92B-2345 December 26, 1979 Mr. Ken Kirsch Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ken: Enclosed please find a copy of the Affidavit of Publication from the Spokane Valley Herald on the Medicus Rezone. Very truly yours, r WuLasS MICHAEL A. KIRK Law Clerk MAK/js O h,~ . ~ f~ f F " ~yT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON, C u COUNTY OF SPOKANE, S NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE i SPOKAN OHN VLAIiC?VICA being first duly sworn E COUNTY NEARING ...l EXAMINER COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter r~1~111'11 43.21C RCw. notice Is hereby given that on oath deposes and says that he is the tt T~ TR~Y~/•~p pokaneCounry Hearing Examiner of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekly newspaper. That said nt. themmitts ee did on November 20, 1979, Co take the action described below. gaper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than so, Any action to set aside, enjoin, review or otherwise challenge such action on months prior .to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to. published the grounds of non-compliance with the pro islonsof Chapter 13.210 RCW (State in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County. Environmental Policy Act) shall be Washington, and it is now and (luring all of said time was printed in an office commenced on January 19, 1980 or be barred. maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which The action taken by the Spokane <<i id newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Su- County Hearing Examiner committee. notice of which is hereby given, was as perior Court of the State of Washington in and for Spokane County. That the follows: (1) Approved Action: Zone reclassification request Not.ic-e . . . of Act - t - ion _.........c (2) Description: Agriculturist to annexed is a true 0 of a • • residential office (3) Such action pertained to property commonly known as and-or described as. Property located approximately 700 feet.,east of Pines Road and bounded on the north by Nora Avenue and on the j as it Was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form), of Bald south by the Houk Road cut de sac. (I) Pertinent documents may be examined duringhe normal Spokane count County y newspaper business hours att once each week for a period of wp....................... consecutive Planning Department, N721 Jefferson Pthone, (509)k4~?TOSashington 99260. 12th Notice Given By: Thomas Marksm, weeks, commencing on the _.day of.._._D ---..eCember..... 19.7 General Partner, Medicus General Partnership Filed by: Michael A. Kirk, law clerk, Bastine A Coombs, P.S., Attorneys and ending on the........ I-qU..... day of Jj ~}ZL...... 1212-12-19 b t.h dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to I* subscribers during f said p .00 bt:bscri d sworn to efore me this lqth..._............._.....day w..... ,December , 19.799,. Not 'u is in and fo the State of Was ngton, Residing at: Spokane, wA AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) JUDITH K. SHOO ei ng first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the 12 day of December 19 79. I personally deposited in the United States mail at Spokane Washington , with sufficient postage prepaid, a. true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF ACTION, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to Department of Ecology. DATED this day of December 19 79 SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day of December , 19 79 A0oNot~*y Pu is in and for the State ashington, residing at Spokane Rev: 8/14/79 LAW OFFICES BASTINE & COOMBS, P.S. E. 12929 Sprague Avenue PAULA. 9ASTINE ROGER A. COOMBS Spokane, Washington 99216 TELEPHONE ANTHONY E. GRABICKI (509) 928-2345 December 12, 1979 Mr. Ken Kirsch Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ken: Enclosed please find a copy of the Notice of Application for application ZE189-79 as published in the Valley Herald on December 12, 1979 and December 19, 1979. Also find enclosed the originals of the Affidavit of Mailing and Affidavit of Posting for this project. To the best of my knowledge, this is the final action required of us but if this is not the case, please advise immediately. Very truly yours, MICHAEL A. KIRK f Law Clerk f MAK/js Encs. ~v Sp o 1 ~ 19~ P~NNO~gNE' 9 ANC o fP a~Nry gRj~£N l OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGi. LE SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date November 8 , y9 79 _ Inter-office Communication TO Zon{ nQ Ariminis trara_ From County Engineer--- - - ' Subject ZE 189 -7 9 at #15 - on Nora Avenue r ~a~-sdd 16 ) An Engineering review for access onto Nora Avenue or Houk Road will be made Cv County Engineers office when a specific site plan is .fi.lel by the 1e.veloper. Form 327-C R. - File # a, 2,5 -1sq- 7c Sec. /o T'sh'p aS R' e I Classification 4.6 jeC)FF~C 1 M n l;~ Proponent M&oICUS CcN6te,4 L ~4,~nvE ~O • 1 r .a h 1 1 1. f I 4 l • ti 1 . • , , , t T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N PROPOSED/ DECLARATION OF NOPI-SIGNIFICANCE (proposed/final) (significance/non-significance) 1. Description of Proposal: .244/6 R&C4.4SS/fJ C_4--rl-6 G 'oAl 46• *z Ro A/o v c ay~^~ir: ~cJ7' .4~v X47- TyqjS T l ME 2. Proponent: McDjCU,S Ge:,ucoe,4i. A4oeriv&oez.4.~P ~f tsr r/~ve~ Cocr►es , o /,a?o se RAsv E 3. Contact Person: M/C,44rvd. killewe Phone: -EM-.?35o~r 4. County Action(s) Requested: ✓ Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Other: 5. Location of Proposal: N6je,4 4-V g zf je?to)e goo ' rz.467- a.= A'o (fir- DRESEN T c~~CUS C3LUGillL~ LZ4c/G ~G SEA LT/a ~~DG . 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to NOT have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is 1IOT required under RCW 43-21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name Fred L. Dayharsh Name Signature Signature Title Director Title Chai rman Department Planning Department Hearing Examiner Comm. Date October 31, 1979 Date Plovember 15, 1979 • i3 t over Revised 6/1/79 0 L STAFF REPORT DATE NOVEMBER 15, 1979 TO HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER ZE-189-79 I GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT Medicus General Partnership STATUS OF APPLICANT Owner REQUESTED ZONING Residential Office ' EXISTING ZONING Agricultural PROPOSED USE No proposed use at this time PROJECT LOCATION Nora Avenue, approximtely 800 feet East I of Pines Road II SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE Approximately 3 5 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site slopes very steeply down towards 1-90 from the south property line and is substantially covered in Ponderose Pine NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER The area is in transition from single family and undeveloped to residential office LAND USE Site Undeveloped/Ponderose pine coverage North 1-90/Mini -storage East William Main Office Complex West Undeveloped/1-90 right-of-way South Medicus Office Bldg /Pacific Health Bldg ZONING North Commercial/ Restricted Industrial, estab- lished, 1977/1976 East Residential Office/Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1976/1969 West 1-90 right-of-way/Agricultural, established, 1942 South Residential Office, established, 1971/1974 1 ZONE RECLASSI FICATIC VUMBER ZE-189-79 II SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Residential NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS 0 III BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The applicant will be required to appear before the Hearing Examiner Committee for a change of conditions hearing The Committee will consider the site plan and conditions at that hearing IV AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas Access plans for firefighting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance 3 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water is required for the following zone changes A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1 Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Nora Avenue and/or applicant must be a willing participant in any future Local Improvement District (LID), Road Improvement District (RID), or County Road Project (CRP) 2 Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project 3 The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving 4 An engineering review for access onto Nora Avenue or Houk Road will be made by Spokane County Engineer's Office when a specific site plan is filed by the developer 2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIO IUMBER ZE-189-79 IV AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) c) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 No comments received e) SEPA 1 That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43 21C 080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site Improvements are made 2 The zone reclassification has been found to be environmentally non-significant Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee 3 The specific development plan for this zone reclassification shall be subject to all of the provisions of SEPA, Chapter 43 21C RCW when submitted to the Hearing Examiner Committee f) ZONING 1 The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits 3 FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE _ i , N 811 Jefferson 456-5786 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 iI v p November 149 1979 SPOKANE COUNT COURTHOUSE TO FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE ZONE RECLAS FICATIONS ZN50-79, ZE-155-79, ZE-163-79, BW-101-79, ZE-1l3-79, ZN-2-57, ZW-186-79, ZE-116-79, ZE-158-79, ZE-119-79, ZN-128-79, ZE-159-79 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required A plot plan showing property use and development is required A plot plan showing property use and development in relationship to water for fire flow must be submitted for approval prior to land use or development LD/ba R ECEIVEV N O V 111979 SPOKANL COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT - A 1 r 74, s •1:r,s AGENDA, NOVEMBER 15, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS CONTINUED 1. IN- 50-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (Hamilton Road and Highway #395) Proposed Use: Mobile Home Park Applicant: HOUGHTALING (20.5 Acres) 2. ZE-155-79 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO COMMERCIAL (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Herald Road) Proposed Use: Retail Applicant: BRACKEN (8 Acres) B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 3. ZN-128-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Hastings Road, 300 feet East of State Highway #395) Proposed Use: Veterinary Clinic/Office Applicant: SLACK (.6 Acres) 4. ZE-163-79 AGRICULTURAL/TRANSIENT LIVING TO COMMERCIAL (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Flora Road) Proposed Use: No proposal at this time. Applicant: HITCHCOCK (14.4 Acres) 5. ZW-101-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Thorpe Road, 300 feet East of Kenyon Road, extended North) Proposed Use: Restricted Industrial Uses Applicant: SCHULTZ (33.28 Acres) 12:00 NOON - - - - - LUUNNC.H_ (Place to be announced at the Hearing) 1:30 P.M. RECONVENE C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 6. ZE-189-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Nora Avenue, approximately 800 feet East of Pines Road) Proposed Use: No proposal at this time. Applicant: MEDICUS (8.5 Acres) 7. ZN- 2-57 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS - LOCAL BUSINESS (Southeast corner of Country Homes Blvd. and Wall Street) Proposed Use: Professional Office/Retail Shops Applicant: NORTHWOOD PROPERTIES (5.42 Acres) (contd.) 5POJ~ANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTIAENT s&Iaww- &"4 7ew- ,ate A EAST 10019 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 November 6, 1979 Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone changes have been reviewed for fire protection: ZE-155-79 Bracken ZE-163-79 Hitchcock 121x-189-79 Medicus ZE-116-79 Haffner ZE-158-79 Shogren ` ZE-159- 79 Ronner r• ZE-119- 79 Fogg Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around th6 building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 4V 9A 'AT ok Lt. of Inspectors - { AC : s n Y C E ~ 7 9 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING UEPARTMENT PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES t it } FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson 456-5786 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 r rig October 31, 1979 SPOMANt Vii: 1.Nlt Viii~1FI HOUSL TO: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM:. LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONES RECLASSIFICATIONS Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. November 6, 1979 Hearing: ZW-85-79 ZN-179-79 ZW-178-79 ZN-180-79 ZN-125-79 ZE-65-79 ZE-157-79 ZE-194-79 ZE-216-79 ZE-94-71 November 15, 1979 Hearing: ZN-50-79 ZE-155-79 AN-128-79 ZE-163-79 ZW-101-79 ECEI VE ZE-189-79 ZN2-79 NOV ZW-186-79 X979 ZE-116-79 SPOKANE COUNTY ZE-158-79 PLANNING ZE DEPART -159-79 MENT ZN-134-79 LD/ba , PLANNING DEPARTMENT 8ROAOWAV CENTRE BUIIOING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260 ~YOn~ML COIiNTV GOuNI nuU3L CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: Department of Ecology 6. School District- # ,,Spokane County Health District 7. Department of Game (Inter-Office) -"'3-Department of Social and Health 8. Department of Natural Resources Services `~4-Fire District # 9. State Parks & Recreation Commission `•~•Water District # ob. DET~7o TIQ~rvS~C2T~r.o~ 1'fo0 ,W OLr.;-Cr"e/0- C-a. FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached . Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: 2~ -id9-79~ rte. to 1'2. o ~ m e zo is us G aweRA L No lw Ut La f? Ar T•4 td Tf M & . ow A•UF, Soo 'Q040 , V.. o F ~iP ccs ,~r /'~icD~Cus BOG-. ~~v A~tc~G ~c ~lc~ ~-nw 8~-ob. This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on October 31, 1979 Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for November 15, 1979 The subject proposal or action IS ISM) LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIG- NATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER ENVIRON- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GW I E) should be prepared. Enclosures Rev. 4/17/79 4 1PL AVEN-,E~ E U C L 1 © AVE. 1 m + 1 11. L~ gg~ ~U tt MARIETTA AVE 4 Par&A w CARLISLE EPUNA-~ LA } 0 10 [ ' aI J i7A- M MANSFIELt) <U •J r E-189-79 Ift 65 5"ANP40 Jgr~ TO hi ERY DR. . - m O P1 Al Ila NORA I+c r+~ MISSION AVE.. kJA x E ~Yy S+NTO I T 104T ShAR 0 BOON E < <v LILL 1,: r` Q c W DESMET T c ` Z r DE S M ET AV E 0 k a# ATAL O CsaTA,L oU U- W > IY CATA A ~ L n O W t~v c r. Q Make W a [x D1 tn. r1k WAY > E3 w _ r 'J ' A. V A-K/ I► I v - 1 .1000 W s AVr < VIA File # Zc - /89' 7 4 Sec. _o T'sh'p~ R'ge 1, !11T Zl~ Classification ro Proponent S P O K A N E C O U N T Y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subse- quently been reviewed by the f~~triy( r"gZ7;vr,,-At f . The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Actions(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval ; Final Plat Approval Change of Condition ; Other B. Description of Proposal: Q_EznKi=_ re.~M A(--3 7 A O P,LAt4 Ai -TALL, -tlp4F C. Location of Proposal: No i-A 4 -4 (`1~= t>>tir"r-_~ ~ t~ NAG 7E-1 F fJ,t;~=~ -N T h"~ i= ~)~l " ~!.S LPL 1~ ~ A it P 1 F , II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) Earth (8) ~/Land Use (15) Energy (2) ~~Air (9) /Natural (16) Utilities Resources (3) Water (10) Risk of Upset (17) Human Health (4) Flora (11) Population (18) ~L Aesthetics (5) _,ZFauna (12) _,,:,~-Housing (19) Recreation (6) _,CNoise (13) Trans/Circ (20) Arch; Hist (7) Light/Glare (14) PubIic (21) Other Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: S1- F: c n jyL)- -r6,~r s ~rc~ Am~~ Fop Revised 6/1/79 C. Discussion of impacts identified above: Ill. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff; A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of non- significance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recom- mends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: Revised 6/1/791 - Sp►Q File # i ( r f ~ ~ ~ ENV IRONM"ENTaI CNECKL I ST Sec. -Twp Rge.10-25-44 introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chaoter 43.21C, RCA, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to hlep the agencies in- volved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information , presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanaticr.s of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers. include your explanation in the space provided. or use additional pages. if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now wi, help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the pro- posal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate _:unty .eoar,:.,ren:. State law requires-exclamations for every "•res° and "naybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing -ne .orm may De required to provide exp anations for 'no' answers, 3na in same _ases, -)or, :eta, ac ~nfornatian 'o aid -r a '7resticl! determination. NOTE: This is a standard farm being usea oy 311 ;taze 3na 'c-cal acenc,es in 'he =fate )f 'aashtne_rcn `or varlou's -yces ar proposals. Many of the QUeSLiOnS may iCt :?DgiV `J :Cur rrnCCS3l. .r 7Ues~lOn :Ces )ot answer ^C' and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL ':.HECXLiS{ 7CR14 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Medicus Genera Partne i Phone Number 9, 2 8'- 2 3 5 c/o Bas tine & Coombs, S. 2. Address of Proponent: 3. Oate Checklist Suomi t ea: ql.-I*,l 7 4. Agency Requiring Checklist r S. Name of Proposal. if Applicabi . - NA 6. Nature and Brief Description of the .roposa (including tut not limited to its size, genera desi n elements. and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Rezoning of approx. 3.5 from agricultural to residential office. There is no development proposed at this time. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as trio extent of the land area affected :y any environmental impacts, including any other info tion n ed to ive ' D a Curate understandin of th a vi n- mental setting of the proposal): Property is located soutK O ora Ave . arox. e 20 reet east of Pines Road an approximately 4UU ee north o-F ssion venue. cur o indi ng, land uses are a medical off i cP bti i 1 ding an on t_i-ral c-1 i n i an office building, etc. 3. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: NA 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - inc'.udina rezones): Rezoning by Spokane County appears to be the only governmental approval required. (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for`uture sddi*_ions. expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? if yes, explain: No It is likely that the property will be developed at some future date but no plans have been formalized IOb. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: Yes, Two additional adjacent parcels are held by this partnership and are leased on a long term b Rim 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or lane adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: Yes Plans are being drafted for an office hi3i 1 di ncl on the property located southwest of the subject property 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none nas peen _omoleted, but ~s expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See attached * II. ENVIRONKNTAL IMPAC'S (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . . _ X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? . . . . . . . X (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . . . . - - ;e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soi is, either on or off the site? . . . • • x _ *All answers given to these questions are based on development of a hypothetical office/apartment building on the site as per direction of Planning Department Staff r (IF SPA EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADD; PAGES.) , (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream X or the of the ocean or a ba inlet or lake? As in any conslyru6tion, there will' be ininimal 'wind ero's'ion durinT Explanation: const.suct ; on. Overcoveri na of the soil for marking an un er t e_ uidin2oitself moil r suit in decreased in 1 ra ion of ain water b ade- ua e visions will ~e made for ensuring --a atdequate rdraina e x.i s to alleviate possible problems 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . . • • • • • • • • (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ e (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in e climate, either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: Some particulate pollution will result from the raisin of dust during construction This will be only a temporary condition, however. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, x in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amo unt of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . . . . . • • • • _ (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . • • • • • • • . - x (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved x oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? . . . . . • • • • _ X (g) Change in the quantity of Bound waters, eigher through direct additions or withdrawals. or through interception of an x aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leacnate. phospates. detergents. waterborne virus or bacteria. or other substances x into the gound waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for x public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation. As stated above the creation of im ervious surfaces- will decrease in i tration capacity on site. Installation of a septic drainfield Department regulations sou negate this possibility 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes !iaybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass. crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Explanation: Although the rope tis currently zoned agricultural it is not being used for agricultural purposes a e Present ti-me. e veyetckl-lve un esi.ra a ue to previous i age an resu an i ur an e o native S. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: f es Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area. or result x in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . . x _ _xoianatlon: h hi tat on site iss marginal dlie to location.DrPvious di s irhan _e of native condition and degree of activity_on surrounding parcels. Inevitably thPrP wi 11 hp rii et•iirhanr-P -nf WhhA+-C~%- mi n takes place on site but such usage is negligible 6. Noise. Yes Ifvoe Yo (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: rongtructiQn noise and vehicular traffic increases will take place but will,not ap rQci4Lbly grease general nn'se efreewaue to the proximity . o1 of t-hp-gte to Pxisti-n ice structures the Liant and Glare. Yes Maybe Vo (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Z- - Explanation: Any lighting will be designed to minimize glare and impact on surrounding land uses. 2 (IF zrnbc FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 8. Land Use. Yes Maw'-°~ No (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ Explanation: Proposal will enable the future development of the suhjgr- -nrnn Prfiy ho a rela ive hi h, e s t la d use. T is is the nl fe s'bl e, f use, o ever character of surrounding development 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: yes Maybe -4a (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X_ (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X _ Explanation: Any nonrenewable resources such as rock asphalt, etc. used in cons r c ion will e depleted u is proposal wi not result in inordinate rates of -c;uc•h t]QaQe 10. Risk of Uoset. Does the proposal involve a resk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe No release o hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: 11. Population, Yes Maybe No will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Explanation: The proposal will serve the already expanding population of the Spokane Valley area but will not result in any appreciable increase in rate of growth, circulation patterns, etc. 12. •Housin . Will the proposal affect existing nousing. or create a iemand :or additional nousing? Explanation: Any such increased demand will be negligible. 13. Transoortation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes ya_; be No (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? . . . . . . . . . _ x (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? X - (e) Alterations to wateroorne. rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Increase in traffic hazards to :rotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Exclamation: The likelihood is that location of m to e o ort n' t' es in the Spokane Valley will result in a net decrease in vehicular movement due to i-hp 1 PQQPn i ng of Pmnl nj&PPQ nPPH to trauPl anwni-nwn to wnrk _ Parking will be provided on site 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result Yes yavbe No in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of of the following areas: (a) Fire Protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ {b) Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x Ex lanation: Any new construction results in increased need for nil ice ana fire protection u due o t e character of existing development in the area such increase will be negligible. (iF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION iS INADEOUATE. PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES., 15. Energy will the proposal result in: /es Mavoe 'to (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ JL (b) Demand uoon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: An office apartment building requires heating. as any other 1-175-7-ac 1 1 y u due to frig cost o energy,conservation will be stressed in construction and oneration. 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems. Yes Maybe No or alterations to the following utilities: X (a) Power or natural gas? . • • . . . • • . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • - (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ x (d) Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - e 3 (i! I FOR EAPL:4UTION ;S :NACECI AITE . PLEASE aTTACii ,'►AL P RGE . } w X (f) Solid waste and aisposal? . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exol anaticn: All necessary util site. Due o t ac c► sewer facilities in the area, the buildin will require installation of a septic drainfield. Yes !Ube NO 1.'. +jiiann 4ealth. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? . . . . . X Explanation: 18. Aestmetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . , . . , . . Explanation: ~Qal& 008,2k r Q n 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational oaoor-unities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ex laon: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will :tie arooosal result in an alteration of a Yes xLe u significant arched ogil or historical site, structure. object or building? . . . . . . Explanation: Ill. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the .enalty of perjury that the above responses ire made truthfully and to the best of my knowieage. I also understano that, should there be any willful nisreoresentatlon or willful lack of full disclosure on my part,Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of nonsienificance that it night issue in reliance coon this cnecklist. -Date- Proponent:/ u-1 (Please Print or Type) c/o Bastine & Coombs, P . S . Proponent: MEDTCUS GENERAL PARTNERSHIP Adams: East 12929 Sprague Spokane, Washington 99216 Phone: 928-2345 Person completing fore Michael Kirk Phone: 928-2345 Date: 8/30/79 . Devartnent or office of :aunty Reviewing Checklist: Spokane Count Planning De t. Staff 4efteris} Reviewing C"seckiist: 1 A LAW OFFICES BASTINE & COOMBS, P.S. E. 12929 Sprague Avenue PAULA. r ROGER R A. . COO COOM65 Spokane. Washington 99216 TELEPHONE ANTHONY E. GRABICKI 1509) 928-2345 November 6, 1979 Mr. Gary Thompson Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Re: Application No. ZE-189-79 Dear Gary: Enclosed please find the Affidavit of Posting and Affidavit of Mailing required for completion of the above referenced zone change application. To the best of my knowledge, we have taken all steps required of us and are now ready for the hearing. Should this be an incorrect assumption, please contact me at your earliest convenience in order that I may take whatever further steps are required. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge your kind assistance throughout the application process. This assistance has been greatly appreciated. S.incerely, HASTINE & COOMBS , P , S . MICHAEL A. KIRK Law Clerk MAK/js Encs. I K~SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) THOMAS J. MARKSOT , Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on November 4 1979, he personally posted a true and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane County, to-wit: On the property in question facing Nora Avenue Wavow~ Agent Subscribed and sworn to me 19~y NOTE AY PUB IC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUN'T'Y , wA~rilri~s"TOati Re ding at Spokane, Washington ZE.. lp9_7 9 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) JUDITH K. SHOOK 1 61 Being first duly sworn oath, deposes and says: ~7 That I am a citizen of the United States of over and a resident of the State of Washington, and age of eighteen years. That on the 2 day of ' 1979, I personally deposited in the ni e States mail at Spokane, Washington with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached reference, to the hereto and incorporated herein by re ens, as shown recorded real property owners Treasuredr/ sr records as of the on the Spokane County 19~_, who or-fnhin ' 16 day o f within a four hundred have been found to own property (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and did notice adjacent property owners to the site by certified mail. The notices were addressed di at dose individuals and sent to those and incorporated herein by the attachment attached h reference. DATED this 2 day of November 19-7-a • day of SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this 19~ y• NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR OKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washin on APPLICATION NUMBER s=•~ ~a fJr,' - - APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: V~`' Application No: ZE-189-79 7-7 Name of Applicant: _ Medicus General. Partnership Street Address of Applicant: c/o Bastine & Coombs, P.S,, 12929 E. Sprague Ave. Att'n; Michael Kirk City: Spokane State: WA 99216 Telephone No. 928-2345 Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Aril 24, 1942 Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Zone Classi'L-ication: Residential Office Proposed, Use ~)f Property: Vacant Legal Descrsp" n 3f: t roperty:Tract 22, Assessor's P1 ,L , 6, F`,X CE PT the 'out of said Tract 23 and ALSO EXCEPT the right of way of liouk road and ALSO EXCEPT that. portion of Nora Avenue lying within said Tract 23. AND That portion of 'Tract 16, Assessor's Plat No. 6 lying south of the right of way of Nara Avenue. AND That portion of Tract 17, Assessor's Plat No. 6 lying south and southeast of the right of way of Nora Avenue. Section: 10 Township4 25 N. Range: 44 , EWM Source of Legal: Michael Dirk Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 14543-0248. Also portions of 14543-0246 Property Size: Approximately 3 5 acres Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Approx. 8~ acres C10! 5 _ o - r" ^ e r-t-,-: unknown Who holds Titie to tzp t roperty: 14edicus Gene al Partnership If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it ? NA Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. * and 10543-0247. Both of these additional parcels are under the same ownership as Parcel 10543-0248. Parcel No. - 1 - 10543-0247 is on a long term lease to Medicus Professional Center and taxes are paid by them as part of the lease provisions. Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: I . What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? This area of the Spokane Valley is rapidly urbanizing and adjoining parcels have already been fully developed. To leave this parcel zoned Agricultural would be to refuse to acknowledge the trend. 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties ? The rezoning of this parcel to Residential office will bring it into conformance with the zoning on adjacent parcels and will result in compatible types of development. 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no why') No. The property in question is currently zoned Agricultural. Such a zoning classification is inappropriate due to the fact that the parcel is of small size (3.5 acres), has a substantial break in slope located in the center of it and is surrounded by land uses (medical center, eye clinic, office building) which are incompatible with agricultural usage. I. the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. (Signed) C. (Date) _2_ LAW OFFICES BASTINE & COOMBS P S E 12828 Sprague Avenue ROGEaaa easrlra =M88 EBs Spokane Washington 88218 SHE Ftoa ARTHOW E oaaelClu (509) 828-2345 September 4, 1979 Mr Gary Thompson Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Re Application Number ZE-189-79 Dear Gary Enclosed please find a check for $300 00 together with a zoning worksheet, environmental checklist and application for zoning reclassifi.caiton to cover the proposed rezoning of a parcel of land owned by Medi.cus General Partnership As you will recall this parcel is located between Mission and Nora Avenues dust east of Pines Road The pre-application fee of $10 00 for this transaction has already been paid It is my understanding that this application will be heard on December 13, 1979 by the Hearing Examiner Committee On August 30, 1979, I spoke with Ken Kirsch of the Planning Department staff and explained to him that, due to my final examination schedule at Gonzaga Law School, it was my desire that the hearing on this application be held at the afternoon session of the Committee He stated that this accommodation could likely be made I would like to be notified at the earliest possible date if such an action presents a problem It would be my preference that we be scheduled as early in the afternoon as possible Please note that the photographs required as part of the application package are not enclosed They will be forwarded at the earliest possible time The required notification of property owners cannot take place until November due to the requirement that the title company search be dated not more than 45 days prior to the hearing date it is my understanding that Planning Department staff will undertake preparation of the notice to be mailed and will then forward it to me for distribution Please advise if this is an incorrect assumption Posting of the required sign will take place in November It is my hope that all required steps have so far been complied with Should this not be the case, I would appreciate notification at the earliest possible date Thank you for your kind assistance Sincerely, ~tLo,pk A MICHAEL A KIRK cc Medicus General Partnership Law Clerk ZONING WORKSHEET Form C Application # ZE --1 r9 This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departmenfs who agree that the legal description is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to rem sent a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed below ) PART I - to be completed by Spokane County Encrineer A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: Ye s No . 2) Access to be limited to: 3) -Access permit is required. 4) a. Dedication for right-of-way is required. ( feet on Road, Street, Avenue.) b. Radius ( foot) is required. (On - and - - Road, Street, Avenue.) C, _ Slope easement is required S) ~S Drainage Plan is required. aK on-site off-site. 6) Paving Permit is required. feet on Road.) 7) Curb is required, (along Road, Street, Avenue.) 8) Sidewalk is required. (along Road, Street, Avenue.) 9) Applicant must be willing to participate in future LID/RID. 10) L Legal description is acceptable as reviewed. Parcel No. OS Comments: I o 'P// f 1'/4 A 6 ~~;~ra~ Q ~ c e~i~i`7~i •a~s ~4 ~ l T ,L >-17 e 1120, rc t~i'c-wc~. Signed - Da to - i ZONING WORK""'T--continued-2 PART-11 -to be completed by Spokane County Utilities Department A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Utilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development i 4 is not cated in a public sewer service area operated and maintained by Spokane. County, 2) A storm drainage plan is is not required for the proposal Comments: Sig e Da to Water PART III- to be compleied, by Spokane County A , Water Supply 1) The proposed development is located with the Alk-dem Elect- c BA" 4r district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agreement/arrangement has been made to serve this proposal, 3) We are/are ~e to supply this development with adequate potable water, 4) We are/are not able to supply this development with adequate water for fire flow, "t S) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other: 6) Water systemis not under State Utilities jurisdiction. 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: ~l inches. 8) Distance to main: S~ f feet. B. or, AS to be completed by Apglicant or, AS 1) Individual water supply will be develope i ithout fir rotection capabilities. Comments: :524- - M Z 41 Signed Da to C. If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Department of Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to application. 1) I/We have reviewed the proposal. It appears to meet State requirements for public water. N ~ p z9~ / Signed - D.S.H.S. - ZONING ""RKSHEET continued-3 PA to ed by S oo a t Fire Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District 2) Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Fire flow i. /is~ nodadequate for proposed development Ad i is not required , - ral, 4) Main (s) need to be installed. 5) Hydrant (s) need to be installed S) Driving distance to nearest fire station is Comments: 7 A.. Te 6- CJ 7o n d ale. Si ed Date y PART V - to be completed by S ~jne_ County Health D " trio A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: a 4 r L Othe methods Ins dared were: 2) Air duality is/is not a concern with this proposal. 3) Ground water quality is/is not a concern with this proposal 4) Noise is/is not a concern with this proposal. 5) Light is/is not a concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: 19~&ne X Da A PRE APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY ' c Date: Application No: - ~ I Name of Applicant: Medicus General Partnership Street Address of Applicant: c/o Bastine & Coombs, P. S. , 12929 E. Sprague Ave. e~ Q MARY, City: Spokane State: Washington Telephone No. 928-2345 Zip Code: 99216 Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural Date Existing Zone Classification Established: April 24, 1942 Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Zone Classification: Residential Office Proposed Use of Property: Vacant Legal Description of Property: Tract 23 Assessors Plat No. 6 in Sec. 101 T. 25 N., R. 44 E.W.M. as recorded in Volume "P" page 14 Spokane County, Washington except the south 400 feet of said Tract 23 and also except the right of way of Houk Road and also except that portion of Nora Avenue lying within said Tract 23. That portion of Tract 16 Assessors Plat No 6 in Sec_ 100 T. 25 N., R. 44 E.W.M. as recorded in Volume "P" page 14 Spokane County- Washington lying south of the right of way of Nora Avenue. That portion of over... Section: 10 Townshi~r 25 N. Range: 44 E.W.M. Source of Legal: Michael Kirk Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 10543-0248 Also .port i ong _nf Property Size: Approximately 3.5 acres * 10543-0246 and 10543-0247. Both of these additional parcels are under the same ownership as parcel 10543-0248. Parcel number 10543-0247 is on a long term lease to Medicus Professional Center and taxes are paid by them as part of the lease provisions. ACTION R SCREEN APAR USERID. IND CHANGE-REASON H_ -------------------------ASSOCIATED PARCELS JURISDICTION= 11 ROLL= RE PARCEL= 45103 0291 YEAR= 93 RC JU YR RO 1-PARCEL 2-RELATION 3-OWNER STATUS 01- AC 11 93 RE 86-1176 CONVERTED SEG# 02- DN 11 93 8640013?47' DOCUMENT NUMBER NOT ON FILE 03- FB 11 93 RE 00651 OP FIELD BOOK# NOT ON FILE 04-- 05-- 04-*LO09 HEADER CHANGE ACTION R SCREEN APAR USERID INQ CHANGE-REASON H_ ASSOCII ATED PARCELS J URl SD I CT`ILON= 11 ,ROLL= RE PARCEL= 451`03, 0^92 YEAR= 93 RC JU YR FO 1--PARCEL 2-RELATION 3-OWNER STATUS Olt- AC 11 93 RE 86-1176 7 CONVERTED SEG# E 02- DN i l l 93 <IiEt 0, 3 ? NUMBEF~ NOT ON F;I LE 03- F$ 11 93 RE 00651 OP FIELD BOOKW NOT ON FILE 04- 05- 04-*LO09 HEADER CHANGE „d~„. ' ~ ~ # ° .r _ z a w i ; ' ~ ~ x t l" ! ~s - - - - - - - - - - - - ~°i . ,a~.~rv . . ~ x i r" ~ { f ~ ~ 0~' _ ~ ~ ~ r. I `"8. r p s Px F YX A. k d ~ x ' ~ z ,X. A °R,. ~ s ~ , ~ •