Loading...
ZE-216-79 ~~]]~T TTfJ~'1 ~r ~ .~!--r1 r-nrrr'+~ ~ n n °'t 3 ^,T" ~ -..1 ~ r,.,,,-~ .1~-+[i.tlL rli .~).~.~a.:.: ~1.. ~~.'y':l..t .'l~..t. Vii,.. ~..,~l r.~': ll v~'.._ L.i~~ -~L.=►.'....a,.~ `L .r v , 1 ...i...r iBLIC ~ , " ~rrculd ~~'~e to ce a~ . e cr ~ ~ ^he ar ~ T'rcu~.c p ~ n r~ f ~ ~~c~~l~ ? ~ e to ~e on „e~ by c.n rc ccrd is (Check. one). ~~v.. / . nT~., . ~ )R a~ a a ~ ' ~PPJyTTyCT o.. a4z~~cr~l o~_ ~~zm~~r T-COY L •rn ' . s .,.±i •rr ~ s TV s ry 'jr ~ ~ gy'm' ~(7 „;rLl ;i_a~'1 ;A ~~T i _ & v %.`L' S __~c.t''~Y'~ . ~ ~u vsai1 ~c J"+:j _ 2 v i~.''.~' ~ . _r.... „ .Ll .viS!'~ ~C .71.... ,r.,,, n ,'""'7 _,o A7 A7 ~ Ar ~ ..0 \T ~:.~s ~ , \T Y .A J"~^ nw - ~ ar Twp ' ~ '„'-«F~.ni. ~ .~2.7~ ._°?So ,aG.:.:.. r __,....v ,/~~'N ~ -~a_... (.,ems.:. __.,.._s~~ / / ~ / 4 .~tr'il.T ~L+L'w`I~.,;, lel1:'1`11 ~ ~~:.i'il.T ....^..t~.l': ~ iL~L', r~ wrr TBLIC ==FC p~~l~c~tian :ic. !~~l ~ .j~t~ ~ ar ~J~1~rCGt~t ~ /f / / .~i~ r. ~.l~i t V C L T T~rculd lw'~e to 'oe a ~eecr~. i:~ (^'nec:: ore ~ ~~.cul~ 1''.e tc ~e en .ec be on record Ln (Check one). T. 7 TI'"r RL .~.nL I fCLI ;vZ~Il ~J~'_.:'"~ ~.t T.~.'1:.5 _:~~'"ll'.:.#n ~a "'JLl `'7:.":1 t~ ~ v 7- r 11 -6 1) v: ~ ,r +r~^y / A• V ~ ..C .i~..'..+.. _e4..~•r (r.lu. ,J{`~ T-rn~ ~~..S'..7CA ~"r1y,~ ~ I ~ ~ j ZONE/PUD RECLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST Contact 5wi lla~~ Pile # Z'0_?-14__747 qZ-Z --Z Z, -Z77-, PART ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership) j'Yl ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION, (F o r m A) YY1 ZONING WORKSHEET YYl ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST JA PLOT PLANS (5) NS -18 SIGN PLAN N A LANDSCAPE PLANS (5) GRAPHICS PACKET SLIDES (minimum size film 126) (date) APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS (date) T COUNTY AGENCIES NOTIFIED NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPED, (date) ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT date STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST STAFF ANALYSIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING (A Sign - 4x4) (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) (date) ANALYSIS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PART HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) t SEPA's Notice of Action BONDING (Landscape) ACCEPTED (date) RETURNED _ (date) rile No ZE-216-79 r-, SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 6, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane Myers, and Ted McCoury and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change, Ken Keto, Applicant for a Zone Reclassif cation,, Agricultural to Commercial for the purpose of general commercial uses without a specific site plan B FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, and undeveloped 2 That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for agricultural, undeveloped, or use under study 3 That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural 4 That the provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with 5 That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled 6 That the land in this area may be suitable for certain proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification 7 That certain proposed uses within the requested zone classification may be compatible or incompatible with existing uses in the area 1 ile No ZE-216-79 8 That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed use 9 The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed land use classification, without any specified uses to not be in harmony with the general purpose and may be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare 10 The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee a) That the applicant submit a development plan which would indicate specific proposed uses for the property and return for consideration by the Hearing Examiner Committee at a future hearing C ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Hillstead and Keto Investments, Inc for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be denied without prejudice Motion by Myers Seconded by McCou ry Vote Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairman 670 ATTEST FRED L DAYHARSH Planning Director By X. ~ ~ 2 S_ REPORT DATE NOVEMBER 61 1979 TO HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER ZE-216-79 I GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT Hillstead and Keto Investments STATUS OF APPLICANT Purchaser PROPERTY OWNER Lane D Dahlin REQUESTED ZONING Commercial EXISTING ZONING Agricultural and Commercial PROPOSED USE General commercial uses PROJECT LOCATION On east side of Progress Road approximately 350 feet north of Sprague Avenue 11 SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE Approximately 1 67 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS Large lot with accompanying single family residence and pasture area Relatively flat site NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER Predominately large lot single family residential with commercial uses to the east LAND USE Site Single family residential and pasture area North Single family residence East K Mart West Single family residence and undeveloped South Single family residence ZON I NG North Agricultural, established, 1942 Agricultural Suburban, established, 1958 East Commercial, established, 1953 West Agricultural, established, 1942 South Agricultural, established, 1942 1 ZONE RECLASSI FICATIO UMBER ZE-216-79 II SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Agricultural, undeveloped or use under study III BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Applicant requests only the zoning change at this time and not site plan approval Applicant will be required to appear before the Hearing Examiner Committee for a Change of Conditions to have a specific develop- ment plan approved IV AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 No comments received b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1 Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Progress Road for right-of-way 2 Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Progress Road 3 Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project c) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Purveyor is VERA WATER AND POWER and is able to supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 No comments received e) SEPA 1 That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43 21C 080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made 2 The zone reclassification has been found to be environmentally non-significant Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee 3 The specific development plan for this zone reclassification shall be subject to all of the provisions of SEPA, Chapter 43 21C RCW when submitted to the Hearing Examiner Committee f) ZON I NG 1 The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits 2 SLIDE NO DESCRIPTION # 4 West side of property looking East from Progress Road # 5 Southeast view from Progress Road # 6 South view from front of property showing Progress Rd and Sprague intersection # 7 Frontage view looking North #10 Sprague Avenue looking East from Progress Road #11 Sprague Avenue looking West from Progress Road #12 Northwest view from Sprague Avenue #14 Northwest view from K-Mart parking lot #17 West view from K-Mart Garden Shop #18 West view of property from the K-Mart service entrance MOM OGE ` 1507 NEM-low ♦ ' GE 1 11 I ~ ~ G~4RpER _ UE t @R 1 OG E 1494506 • 14 ROADWAY AvE Fire ' M Y o es 5totion Z Ro ct ra Q R 's 10 V AL l Z ►1~1 ~ ~ ~ • w _ s AIM ~►V ----1 s ` ~ ac Y 'r i v 2 O 9! i SPRAGUE v U vE ' E v ALE (c #4 sr Pit A Ua - - - ?w N A WJJT V ~ 3 ~ti -216 ~-7 dAI~AI~n w FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: 9-10 - 79 Application No: Z€ - - 79 Name of Applicant: y/GL SnF, -j, V- C ra- x7oVil°ST/~VEwTS cS~,~i46st£ 9~2/~ Street_ Address of Applicant: E. 13701 City: .S/ov ~gyJC State: • Telephone No . 9z y- 00 Existing Zoning Classification: 46-,f, / Gk 4..7-" f2 g AVb ('p~rt~rC~+[Gi L Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Existing Use of Property: S • r. . A-V-4 AAf ryeee Proposed Zone Classification: j!!Aow0 ale e Proposed Use of Property: Ar,IVe.4e*4 4&WA4&24 i4,f aS,6'S Legal Description of Property: OPDXeT/D.V 4A APL.DCt 6 3 DF ✓&-&t A--T 77AC CaF .QEd& - b i= /N ✓04L eA 0"46 O ~ ~ ~i~~►E SO 0,= F= E W-Vz OF <A•l h &-Od r 43 4CX e r Ly/N e► Al 04 *rW O,c 7.0& oeA&- .eer46 R/fir cJ ~¢T s S'i r~c~4-T~ S/b,C .~~rrdii~ Section: Townshivx z $ Range: Source of Legal: A<s Es se& 'S -mc -sue- ,co"4E.v^Z T/rzc 44O • Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) &'5V44- 2Z2 O q~- ZZ/ r~~CES Property Size: I 17 Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Street Address of the Property: Al. 470 AR0&7t5% 'S gCO* 1-b Who Holds Title to the Property: 4 AAJ~ A . 1> A-,4 e-1IV If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what i-s your interest in it? Axe#if -s eoe Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. -I- Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? /1?- ~r1.i JoN 0~= 7? 1*4 G•A#~ GwCVio a-s C 4z Z SEA Aoy7 " D,4c 0.2 / Lr' /iV.4 G ZeN.E L'G ~.~5/~ j/DtJ •{.b c c~ 6c ,Eiy ~~'tl c-t-o~Ed IAA ra ~C- rra~a,~T L~C/ 7-/~l~it/T ~ST~.e.~ GtJII~G~✓ /g1c~E~T~ Tff~S ~•%tTfCFNT ~,~oPE.e 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? _7:;o/C&EtJ-S,C ~tls •~-rt/T ~ ~S ~~1 ~/~4~t~,E 4- AW D 4't SF" 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) it/O . ~ilhCr['~~V 4- A&b ,#V 7a -Ss ew- e!~g,5~4 O.c ~ I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. (Signed) ~vT q 7 (Date) -2- ~y~:•~ cif , t~.~.►-'-a~.'`.~ . _ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST .J .5 t.4 Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C. RC'd, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing orivate proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and 'adversely", as Der WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to hlep the agencies in- volved determine wnether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe' if, in your opinion,, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessa ri. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space orovided. or use additional :aces, if necessary. You should include references to any resorts or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Comaiete answers to these :uesticns haw will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total prooosai. not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the pro- oosal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your prooosai when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. 'his will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be Processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the aporoariate County aepartment. State law requires explanations for every ''yes" and "-avbe" answer on the :"ecklist. The Person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for 'no-' answers, and in some cases, more aetai ed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a ouestion does not aooly, just answer it 'no" and continue on to the next ;uestion. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 8lc 40 1. Name of Proponent: /'✓/GGS i E~4~ A-~D /<E TO TN✓E_5r,.- / Vi Z Phone vumber 94- 2. Address of Proponent: ~.37a S~ i4 AVE. O Z/ 3. Date Checklist Suomitted: -ZO 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: - jZ~WAIrj~ z. Name of Proposai, if Applicap e: E N -.2/4 - 792 5. Nature and Brief Description of the Propose including tut not limited to its size, generai ces,gn elements. and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): ZONE ~EGL ~sS/ice/~ ~ ,&N AGAR 0XeZ= 4 TEL t. G 7 Agwes F.Psmr- ,meei est a_ r,eweez ,4wa 11 C!~s~w>h E~ Q!A TS 4sAK4o" c ye e 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Prooosal, as well as the extent of the land area afszcted by any environmental impacts, including anv other information needed to give an accurate -understanding of the environ- mental setting of the proposa i) : tHE &0PdSJ4G /S 40da7- Jd /At 7X4& -SROJk 4VV,& 40c,Y T IfIVD E/~ST DF ritOb~CESS I~D . ffPP~CAx/I'~/!f C..L C " T. Sao f M ,_V rw OF See 4 &e4 E A✓EiVAce. 3. Estimated Date for Cam ietion of N e Proposai: 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal, state and local - including rezones) : 20NE ~E~Lz /F/C /F7'/D~, Bse/~-~/Nt /E~C/~►~ i T _ SE ~✓.E~'4-C~E ,0994F.,2.y, / T ,9rV L~ t2oAb ,ode If-_ SS P,oe~ss / r- (IF SPACE FOR EXPl.ANAT,ON IS INADEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACH A00I i MNAL PAGES.) 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject 'and, have any plans ;or future adci!;ons, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: w o lob. Do you own or nave options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? if yes, explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered oy your :rooosal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: A10 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed re?arding the proposal; if ,one has :een completed. but is expected to be filed at some future late, describe the nature of sucn application fore: SEE % 7 E ZON/N 4r ENVIRONMENTAL :MP,ACTS Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) yes "aayee_ .10 1. earth. Will the aroposal result in: ;a) unstaole earth .:onditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . . - ,b) 7isr-uptions, ilsolacenents, c:...macVon or cvercovering of the sail? • . - ,c) Change in tocograchy or ;round surface relief features? . . . . . . . . . . . - - ;d) ?he aestruction, covering or ,redification of any unique geologic X or Dnysicai features? . . . . . . • . • • • • • • • • • • • • . . - ,e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? . . • • - X - c ('.F SPACE. FOR =XP! ~N IS iNA-EOU;, "c, P' EASE AiTACM AOOI T IOMAL PAGES. 1 (f) Changes in deposition or erasioa~ ,e 'oeacti sands, or Charges in siltation, deposition or erosion wnicn may r+odify tae znannei of i river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . . . . . . . . Explanation: "vt e) Q V e e L'Q ve'e't"V AWb CePW 00,4e-- T7d N AO'ez L d L'rer¢Ae] ee a &eoP' , eoO1AA0 4V b AJP A1-r:U'•e E•eas,rs y Nzso p 1~ca~i~'' ~,~I,s~-~r~c c >-fe.r.► . . i fJst rFa .S b cc,b t3 Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Ma4Re ye (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . • . • • • . . • • (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate. either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ Explanation: e!LAlwb P-Me2f -~e5fef .b 11E6~ZdA4 4~ ~4-~~/1o'~T- /ZI14 V t31C~/¢TE ,5*40 sG-lE '0~/2 -/Pf /S--rt,aeV S' 46ze-7- 77WE 7- a A/ M Y7, "A Arp r 8 4 ix/ 3. "dater. Will the proposal result in: Yes " Ibe .10 (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements. in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved, oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? . . . . . . . . . (g) Change in the quantity of Bound waters, eigner through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an X aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phosoates, detergents, waterborne virus or oacteria. or other substances into the gound waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (i) Reduction in the amount of eater otherwise available for public water supplies'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exol anat on : eJW-97X rZ oV .b 6d' a 4/ 4 r T1'd N ,Pi - rb Der ,►~Y f~-+ &77-e eZWS Try r4 e. ASE QjC 7WiVK-S A'4-X' d 4*-Sr ..Sdrs7~E 13E /d~+C,r~T~DN L~~ ) 4. Flora. 'sill the proposal result in: Yes yavoe NQ (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of flora (including trees. shrubs, grass. craps, micr•oflora and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . fib) Reduction of the numers of any unique, rare or endangered soecies of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of flora Into an area, or in a barrier to the normal repienisnment of existing species? . (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 46 Explanation: -r c 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes ~+3ybe NO (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or lumber of any soecies of fauna (biros, land animals including reptiles, fish Ana shellfish, benthic organisms, insects ar micro-fauna)? . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introducesion of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat': . • • • . . _ MxoIanation: 5. Noise. Yes Oavbe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? . . . . . . . . X EADIanation. J G~JtG N E /S 7-11✓4r O L .C. C L f Q 2 - 7. Licht inc Sl are. Yes Mavoe '30 a) '+1111 the proposal produce new liont or glare? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Aftle ~xolanation://Y /`Il ECG/L-1:+ ,t I&i,J L / 1l~lE Seams 00/r' 6~ sj4-r /epw> Lc ~.Cl -'P 1 Tu D~2/ E~ - ierv cs .rt d IONf v1e Oq/ ZE /*V r4 v s 1? 73 it 0 - IF SPAC EXPLANATION IS INAOEQUATE. ?LEASE ATTACH AOC AL PAGES.) 3. Land 'Jse. Yes Mavbe_ Vo (a) Will Vie proposal resu;t ;n the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? . . . . • • • • • • • • • • . . ' ' ' Exo ianati on: WAII4 04 /Ale Tl4,o✓ m.~ v7,pz ' .91 T,E IS 7_~AEb 84bwow"'e / 4:2p P 'l ~D~Eiv Tait T~ HP~iytitl.L~ E~2 G.!/L L G o~'!~'-L~~ us -Itk ~C 77 t/ / T 77715 ~~JyC~e Ae's-4 /6I4 1 n>~ a .Y/T A />:~~£b. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: fes Ma be No (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . . . - (b) Oepletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . . • . • • • • • • • • . ' Explanation: (p (~4~ ~SZ~:Jc~`ttL~rG 10. Risk of Upset. Ooes the proposal involve a resk of an explosion or the Yes. Ma_;be "1a release o hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . • • • • . ' ' ' ' Explanation 11. Population. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human copulation of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: L AF y EL & T O•o' T*jC ~Si rte' AC F~E,e TS o.v € AV-,C ✓lc/.,oy/ t cam?- G~1/L tr /~~48~ G ^/O T Ai ,e C T TW 62~~-fnc rMFelq . 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Explanation: Tff~ ~S1i14y-e-6 f/9Ti/G v k s'C err/ S/ TE CeE sr/dE1S /'~1ci~ T~~ • 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe yo (a) Generation of additional venicular movement? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Effects an existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? . . . . . . . . X _ (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of peooie and/or goods? . . • • • • • • • • • • . . ' - (e) Alterations to wateroorne, rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . • • • (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, X bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . ' ' AbD /77e.vr44 ✓6,4eec zme ,wQety w/LL Explaicn' /3 6.e r~ M . 'eEau/REb A.Is o _ -S S 7- Erx S /49, de /Ow JOAe r'ED A-Aoo"ie#4 ryt~ y ~4c rW-4 f~l.~sEirT /,*r7c~U'S . 14. Puoiic Services. Will the proposal nave an effect upon, or result Yes wavee 'to in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of of the following areas: (a) Fire Protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - Jc. (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . • • • • • • • • • . . . - (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . . . . . . . . • • • • (f) Other governmental services? . rr^~. . . . . . . . • . • • • • . • • • . -L Explanation: KQ, 6 , W<IC/S T/N¢ Af I& e 1F F/~~ •SL~~1//GL~.S L✓/G` /h4-/NT,rN e±&-4f E Gd/ L L dZ Ae 4J~EL4- ~SE4- 4Fe 7ED C$V ✓eRNAICN7-49L SERJ1aES. ,IF SPACE FCR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, DL:.ASE ATTACH 401TIONAL PAGES.) ;5. Energy. Will the proposal result in: Yes ~a.ce_ yc (a) Use of suostantial amounts of fuel or enerV? . . . . • • • • . • • • • • . - (b) Oemand upon existing sources of energy, or require the develooment of new sources of energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 16. Utilities. 'Will the proposal result in a ,teed for new systems, yes Mace `•c or alterations to :ne following utilities: (a) Dower or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - '.b) Ccmmunication iystems' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - c i tatar? . . . . . . . . - (d) Sewer or seotic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 tPLANATION IS INADEQUATE. PLEASE A ,ACM A001 A# PACES.) , (.F SPACE (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . • • • • • ' ' ' ' . G . . . . /f-NA G T s S ,sal !sl~c c dE EX/ST/~/Qr- S S T`~ Explanation: VIV 'Ire SL / /Zso ~ fd.! ~E Yes Mavbe No 17. yunan Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards - or potential health hazard (excluding mental neaith)' ' Explanation: of any 18. Aesthetics. Will the swillethetprin the oposaloresulttinnthe creationiofvinta or view open to the public, or - aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . Explanation. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or - auantMty of existing recreational opportunities? . . • . • • . ' ' Explanation: Yes wad No 20. pr nt are-neo Will the result in an object or on building? • • • • • • - ' signgnirfican 9-cal or Explanation: III. SIGIATURE 1, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to 'he best of any knowledge. 1 also understand that. should there be a y wil lfulnons eorscanceithatritillful lack oin full disclosure on my part. Spokane County may withdraw any reliance upon th's checklis . C~ Proponent: Oate• 1. (Please Print or Type) ttv✓eJrJ*A n Address: e. /,370 / sooozwermg 93/x.° • Proponent: s1iasTE4Q 1F k6Ta Phone: 9'Z y- D O Person cpa+oleting form: -*h+IN CS 0/1 Phone: 9Z Z -L2 z Z Oate: q-,20-79 61 A /A Oepartment or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Staff Memer(s) Reviewing Checklist: 4 ,t ZONING WORKSHEET Form C Application # 4E - aid - 79 This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to 12resent a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed below PART I - to be completed by Spokane County Engineer A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: Yes No. 2) Access to be limited to: 3) e Access permit is required. 4) a. I<PX Dedication for right-of-way is required. feet on Road, Street, Avenue.) b. Radius ( a' foot) is required. (On and Road, Street, Avenue.) C. Slope easement is required 5) Y~Pnf Drainage Plan is required. on-site ✓ off-site. 6) Paving Permit is required. L- feet on Road.) 7) ~s Curb is required, (along re~r,c.~S Road, Street, Avenue.) 8) es Sidewalk is required. (along ~-a Road, Street, Avenue.) 9) e Applicant must be willing to participate in future LID/RID, e4 10) Legal description is acceptable as reviewed. Parcel No. Comments: Signed Date ZONING WORKSHEET--continued-2 MRT=II -to be completed by Spokane County Utilities Department A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Utilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development i s no located in a public sewer service area operated and maintained by o ane. County. 2) A storm drainage pla is is not required for the proposal r'jT Comments: / igned Da to A - completed to be Water A , Water Supply 1) The proposed development is located with the Vr=Rf\ WAT-E& S ! Q E •2 district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory /arrangement 4&e/has not been made to serve this _ proposal. 3) We are/avennot able to supply this development with adequate potable wa ter. 3000 6&/V% 4) We are/ooomprot able to supply this development with for fire flow. 5) Water Purveyor is public private community, private, other: 6) Water system ie/is not under State Utilities jurisdiction. 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: Z inches. 8) Distance to main: S' 0 feet. B, to be: tco-m-tn'leted h -4nnj)Zc!ann"tt 1) Individual water supply will be developed with/without fire protection capabilities. Comments: X X Signed Date C , If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Department of Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to application. 1) I/We have reviewed the proposal. It appears to meet State requirements for public water. Signed - D, .H.S. ZONING WORKSHEET continued-3 ART IV - to be completed by Spokane County Fire Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District 40 2) ~s Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Fire flow is s no adequate for proposed development Ond/is not ~ required 4) S Main (s) need to be installed. 5) Hydrant (s) need to be installed. 6) Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) 7) Nearest fire hydrant is feet. 8) Driving distance to nearest fire station is f C~ Comments: 1,1i4k) /6, IzL 7,~724_ Ce-,7/0k) r -I wl-,d _.,000 CG S / T~~ 312 < SignDat PART V - to be completed by Spokane County Health District A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: , 2) Air qualit is is not a concern with this proposal 3) Ground water qualit is is not a concern with this proposal. 4) Nois i /is not a concern with this proposal. 5) Ligh is is not a concern with this proposal 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: 7p "eAle Signed Da File # Sec. J T'sh'p - R'ge 441 Classification- Proponent 1<c Tv T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N Proposed DECLARATION OF Non-Siggificance (proposed /final) (significance/non-significance) 1 . Description of Proposal: _2_0/04!E ~i~i C-4-T;• O 6AI D G=.c /C U U' ~V,/? C 0 ryl Ni k C/~4L. C 2. Proponent: 3. Contact Person: s7►-acs~~2_ Phone: 4. County Action(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Other: 5. Location of Proposal: 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to NOT have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is NOT required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name Fred L. Dayharsh Name Signature k ..D Signature Title Director 6 Title Chairman Uepdr•trrient Spokane County Planning Dept. Department Hearing Ex. Committee Date October 22, 1979 Date November 6, 1979 over Revised 6/1/19 5POKANt VALLtq FIRt DCPARTMtNT c,~ aW4 ,ate X&-/ EAST 10019 SPRAGUE AVE • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 October 30, 1979 R E C E I V E Marcia Raines ~IoV 19. 79 Zoning Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission SPOKANE COUNTY N721 Jefferson PLANNING DEPARTMENT Spokane, Washington It \ Dear Ms Raines, f a % The following Zone Changes av beeh reviewed for fire protection ZE-157-79 FISHER ° ZE-194-79 KAHUN AMD CO ° 10~21!-216-79 HI CD/ K~T r f ~ y ~ ZE- 65-79 0 if Mains and by a e o fdI d iti~' thi s~',,area Access plans for fi e i h ing qui etch ~►~our~d the bu lbing shall be approved pro 'but ing ' y"I't i y suande' H~ Lt Intpegors m ~ PREVENT FIRES SA VE LIVES b~. I FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE I PN 811 Jefferson z 456-6786 ~ SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99201 October 31, 1979 SPOKANE COUNT COURTHOUSE TO FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM LLOYD DYKES i FIRE MARSHAL RE ZONES RECLASSIFICATIONS Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required for the following zone changes A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands November 6, 1979 Hearing ZW-85-79 ZN-179-79 ZW-178-79 ZN-180-79 ZN-125-79 ZE-65-79 ZE-157-79 ZE-194-79 ZE-216-79 ZE-94-71 November 15, 1979 Hearing ZN-50-79 ZE-155-79 AN-128-79 ZE-163-79 ZW-101-79 I?ECEIVE ZE-189-79 ZN2-79 N0V 1979 ZW-186-79 ZE-116-79 SPOKANE COUNT► ZE-158-79 PIANNING DEPART ZE-159-79 DEPARTMENT ZN-134-79 LD/ba OFr iCE OF COUNTY ENGLNEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON p October 30 , tg 79 Inter-office Communication To Zoning Administrator From County Engineer Subject ZE 216-79 # 1 - S' Progress Road #15 Pr-c,(Te~s ~Cac( #19 _POKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Communication Date: October 22, 1970 TO: Zoning A is tor, Spokane County Planning Department. FROM: Eugene her, R.S. SUBJECT: Zoning request for November 6, 1979 1. We have no special comment nn the fn1l.owinp items: ZW-85-79 Lehnertz-McCullougl. ZE-157-79 Fisher 216-79 Hillstead and Keto Investments ZW-178-79 J. Edward Stevens (Diversified Planning Development Consultants) ZE-65-79 Kofinehl 2. Special comment on indicated requestafollow: a. ZE-194-79 Kahuna Land Company: The number of dwelling units possible on the property may be restricted by available area suitable for sewage treatment and disposal. b. ZN-179-79 Layton: This project is in the Phase I Area of the North Suburban Spokane Sanitary Sewer Plan Area. The project should be designed and plumbed to facilitate connections to the public sewer when built. c. ZN-134-79 Ross: This project ultimately must obtain a permit from the Spokane County Health District. To be permitted, detailed plans of the park lay-out, water system and sewage systems must be approved by the District; approvals should be obtained prior to beginning any construction or drilling of wells. d. ZN-180-79 Baker: This project is in the Phase I Area of the North Suburban Spokane Sanitary Sewer Plan Area. The project should be designed and plumbed to facilitate connections to the public sewer when built. e. ZN-125-79 Venerus: The suitability of the proposed drainfield (sewage disposal) areas remains to be verified and is very de- pendent upon the ultimate plans and elevations established for flood control. This project is in the Phase I area of the North Suburban Spokane Sanitary Sewer Plan area. The project should be designed and plumbed to facilitate connections to the public sewer when built. R ECEIVED OCT 2 4 lyiti SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEFARTIOENT SCHO-AUM- I I rlw4m~~~~ Cgs. t, ]EWWW"Ir PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 •dyronA#4 t COuAi1 CowninuuSC CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1. Department of Ecology 6. School District # 2-Spokane County Health District 7. Department of Game (Inter-Office) 3-Department of Social and Health 8. Department of Natural Resources Services 4-Fire District # 9. State Parks & Recreation Commission 5-Water District # 10. FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: r f j This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on October 22, 1979 Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for November 6, 1979 The subject proposal or action (I5, 1S= -NOT) LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIG- NATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER ENVIRON- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY '208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GW I E) should be prepared. Enclosures Rev. 4/17/79 w File # -alt ' Sec. 14 T'sh'p ~S R'ge !f4 Classification A(v-Aoomf l err, Proponent 1y/LL~S~iA~~ f fr~7t~ S P O K A N E C O U N T Y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subse- quently been reviewed by the The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Actions(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval ; Final Plat Approval Change of Condition ; Other B. Description of Proposal: f1 r Ai2e5gSE.v7 THE .?C c-V0,Jy?c. I -S n~M -,t? Cr s-1 Cgs / n!L s,-rF Phu A-AC L~l C. Location of Proposal: t~ r~C~ SS ZOA0 400 Fi=<7 MQ::7e1 ur II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) Air (9) __,,:,,--Natural (16) _,Z Utilities Resources (3) Water (10) Risk of Upset (17) Human Health (4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Recreation (6) Noise (13) T Trans/Circ (20) Arch/Hilt (7)/Light/Glare (14)/Public (21) Other Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: ) 51-tE s ep \jga, TAv-:~ SPP I'-V, rr;~. Revised 6/ x,/79 C. Discussion of impacts identified above: lll. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of non- significance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recom- mends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: Revised 6/1/79 bik 10GE N 4507 - z I I "N GE CARDER UE . Ile- BR i DG E 90 0' N94506 AV E. pv y BROADWAY AV E. HIM 14 13 :.IL n ,Y Fire LKI ogres s°' ' Station N W $C h oo I' z ~ ..Ct rp ~0 :c oc VALLC- WAY oN N 2 r . MAlm gVIL IN r r-j , - -Zr V R I Y. z i 1 1-_ z „ , z RIVE o a O/9SPRAGUE N E v U A- - , ~ ;rte E vE A L E 'rG Nf. ST. P ♦ Z N St. M f Nn a fOC1'1l ovl ~ ~ y~ ~ Rp C Q 1 NN r T►. B.. . 3 rev Ll 6 •M E- FLLET r T, ~ ~ ,M I-'LAKE 1,,_1000 PS Form 3800. Apr. 1976 CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES' M 3 r OPTIONAL SERVICES rn r M CD C-) M 0 RETURN RECEIPT SERVICE -1 -4 c D" _ D 01 3. J~ m~SI 'v T PT ~j 0 Q cl. rv d p o m Z n --4 , SS m y m [fi z rn -n M -1 (D RI 4mQ ~O p O M J M rr a3 ® m Q ric U-5 ;K- M in -I (D z - a m :u rD 2 rn y~~y 32 n cn C3 ^ o ~ ~ o m "-fJ !3~ A A H Fr A A ri PS Form 3800, Apr. 1976 -4 CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES - - - M m v OPTIONAL SERVICES m 10 O 0) J RETURN RECEIPT SERVICE ~ yy Q - X X 0 ~ f.'I C7 2 f~ "M Z 3-:E: x q In U7 a c~ r r O c a © D m `LI ~D* m* q r m JC Ica 0 rn cm:* M c ~a tn a o a m rD c ~wv g ~o fl GL C, rn ~l++ t<m ~o cl) __j CD v 40 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington, and over the age of eighteen years. .en That on the ~ day of 1979, I personally 'deposited in the nited Stat'es' ail at with sufficient postage r-%paid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEART G, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the day of , 19 , who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and did notice adjacent property owners to the site by certified mail. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. w DATED this day Of. .19 SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this day of 19 NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington M APPLICATION NUMBER Z,5/ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) KENNETH R. KETO Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on October 23, 1979 , 1979, he personally posted a true and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane County, to-wit: N. 120 Progress, Veradale, Washington Applicant or Agent Subscribed and sworn to me Ellen M. Barnes October 24, 19 79 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington 9 AGENDA, NOVEMBER 6, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 1. ZW- 85-79 LOCAL BUSINESS & AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Southeast corner of U.S. Highway #2 and Hayden Road) Proposed Use: Mobile Home Sales and Display Applicant: LEHNERTZ-McCULLOUGH (9.5 Acres) 2. ZE-157-79 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO LOCAL BUSINESS (West on Mullan Road, East on Argonne Road, 350 feet north of Valley Way.) Proposed Use: Retail Offices Applicant: FISHER (1.3 Acres) 3. ZE-194-79 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Southeast corner of Carnahan Street and 12th Avenue) Proposed Use: Multiple Family Dwellings Applicant: KAHUNA LAND CO. (5.5 Acres) 4. ZN-179-79 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND/OR RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (West on Division Street, 455 feet South of Hawthorne Road) Proposed Use: Retail and Professional Offices Applicant: LAYTON (1 Acre) 5. ZE-216-79 AGRICULTURAL TO COMMERCIAL (East on Progress Road, approximately 350 feet North of Sprague Avenue) Proposed Use: General Commercial Uses Applicant: HILLSTEAD/KETO 0.7 Acres) 12:00 Noon - - - - - LUNCH (Place to be announced at the Hearing) 1:30 P.M. RECONVENE B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 6. ZE- 94-71 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS (East of Barker Road on Cataldo Avenue) Proposed Use: Free-Standing Sign Applicant: WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY 79 ZW-178-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (East on McFerron Road, 900 feet South of Thorpe Road) Proposed Use: Future Business Campus Applicant: STEVENS (75 Acres) (contd.) P12 5031358 P12 50'13 13,57' RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) (See Reverse) SENTTO SENTTO STREET AND NO. STREET AND NO. nTE AND ZIP -CODE P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE POSTAGE POSTAGE CERTIFIED FEE CERTIFIED FEE r y SPECIAL DELIVERY, SPECIAL DELIVERY RESTRICTED DELIVERY o RESTRICTED DELIVERY y w SHOW TO WHOM AND y w SHOW TO WHOM AN 7 f w DATE DELIVERED CATE DELIVERED ~ ' E ~:HOWTOWHOM DATE S SHOW TO WHOM, OAT E w' y AND ADORES, Or y y AND ADDRESS OF y DELIVERY 67 DELIVERY i w v J w ,faWTOWHOM ANDDATE co w SHOW TO WHOM AND DATE DELIVERED WITH RESTRiCTEC DELIVEREDWITH RESTAIDTE DELIVERY o CELIUfRY c - y SHOW TO WHOM DATE AND ;I; ADDRESS OF DELIVERY WITH t.' 1F_ r IiFI 4 REST RI iTEDfiIEL'VIE Hr r TOTAL M6T AND TOTAL POSTAGE EESO S ' POSTMARK - POSTMARK O ATE > c /r C t AFFIDAVIT OF `'TAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) KENNETH R. KETO ' Being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of over and a resident of the State of Washington, and age of eighteen years. That on the 24th day of October I' 1979, I personally deposited in the United States mail at E. 15120 S ra ue Veradale !~lashin ton with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by refere, asoshthe recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, on the Spokane County Treasurer's records 19 7o~f' Who 4th day of Ser~tem r thin a four hundred have been found to own Pi°antts c wointrolled property and (400) periphery of the aPP owners to the site by did notice adjacent property own certified mail. The notices were addressed ose individuals and sent °hethose reto and addresses incorporated herein by the attachment attached reference. of October 19 79 DATED this 24th day SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this 24th day of October 19 79 . L ~ON C w NOT Y PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington ~6~ zff. APPLICATION NUMBER ,MST OF OWNERS AND PERSC PAYING TABS ON FROPERT-. Spokane County Code Number: Owners application is for a ''ertification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses consisting of this and the following ~.Pages has been prepared from the latest availably records and is to the best of my knowledge correct.'~_. ; J "i Signed by For ~qa a Title Company -)ate : LAST GRANTEE IN GhAiiia ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK -ERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) Herita e Etal -~1 Vera B63 & 64 E72' of Tr63 Barbara Gunsaulis '1 Box 113 Veradale Wa. Tr64.N of. SCDA& R/W 0 L 0 Heritage Etal, *1 Vera Ptn of M RN Within :n Barbara ('unsaiilis fetal Box 113 Veradale Wa E72' of B63 Z:± AFIIIY- ~l 0~ r m Dennis G Vanhoff N 222 Progress Rd Vera N1/3 of Wlac of S1/2 B 53 Wash Mut Sav Bk 0120231323400 -r Mielke & Ifielke N 204 Progress Rd Vera S1/2 EXC N1/ of [alac B 5s 1 Clarence H Ifielke N 121 Progress Rd Ver dale •1~ T Mielke & Mielke Vera Pt of B63 N1 ac of S2.6 i ac to 0 71777.7& S L;Y Clarence H Mielke N 121 Progress Rd Ver 1.4 ac of Ptn of 112 N of R i xc - a s za p to of c*T R/j,T S of & dj above esc prop y; 0' of sd- Tr & E1-T of In 202' Ely S -s n,-- ; - W In of sd Tr. a 7- c ,_;r•.J__ '.7l.:;11uu 11V l.•IL'•.ll.-)F TITLE (0) AND ~ ADDITION PFP SONS PAYING TAXES (T) ADi~nE S LOTS BLK sane D Dahlin Vera Pt of B63 W/12 Exc Lane D Dahlin Rt 6 Box 10 Spokane iptn of W1/2 N of RR R/W 0 C-) r o. 2 Charles J Hil rers N 16 Progress Rd Vera Pt of B63 W202' of S1.4 ac of Ptn of W1/2 N of T Charles J. Hilp, N 16 Progress RR R/[.d / zol r F?. ","itthews N 303 Progress Rd Vera Sheridans B59 L3 B1_ Sav Bk 3 2003 6590 4 o Craig A Lukes N 221 Progress Rd Vera Sheridans B59 L4 B1 r Fid Nut Sav Bk 86 4101 1789 2 q - /W Samuel F Panghurn _ N 209 Progress Rd Vera Sheridans B59 L6 Bl era a .e -Snm„cl r-Pan„~,,,rn- - 1 N 209 Progress Rd 6 i Gregory Krivonos N 215 Progress Rd "era Sheridans B59 L,; Bl Ver Gregory Krivonos N 215 Progress Rd I i r, 1t\t „T G~~~,rr`rFE IN CcIA III TITLE (O) AND , ADDITION :SONS PAYING TAXES (T) ADDRESS LOTS BLK Joanne H. Anderson) Vera Tr63; Ptn of El/2 lyg o exc Barbara Gunsaulis _ Box 113 Veradale Wa 172' & Exc W120' of S145' bill Berry Irv !E 11123 29th Ave Vera 14120' of S145' of El/2 of Tr 63 E'"Rc Sprague- live- r & B Oil Co Box 13280 Spokane i . c2,2.33 r ,r Heritage Etal Vera ptn of E1/2 cif Tr. 63 P sly of mi-y R~W] - Barbara Gunsaulis Box 113 Veradale Wa SCDA&P RR Exc E72' & Evc - - guf Mielke & Mielke -'~2 N 121 Progress Rd Vera E350' of N200' of L'62 - Veradale C1 ~r` ~c c TT f lke N 121 Progress Rd el"/ i Mielke & Mielke -'%2 Vera Blk 62 L N of RR 2 Veradale R W Exc E350' of N200' ' Clarence H Mielde _ N 121 Progress Rd c;11: 'q / P , 411 ~..~i 1C-ter / v IF Sidney F Gibbs N 120 Progress Rd Vera n of W1/2 Tr63 n ----l,anc n Rt 6 Box 10 Spokane _ < 'J 1 t., 1, ] ::•,i, 1:L': Ii - - J~ TITLE (0) AND i ADlli1I0Pl PF.PS0TiS PAYING TAXES (T) ADDRESS LOTS BLK Vera Sheridans B59 U B1 era a e N 121 Progress Rd o 0 William Paul Coode E 15004. Valley Way D Vera W96' of E9/20 B59 William Paul Goode E 15004 Valley Way -1F' ~CIK~ Dallas V Weeks E 14922 Valley Way Dr era E3/11 of W11/20 B51' !)allas V Weeks E 14922 Valley Way Dr Heritage Etal - Vera Tr~4 'Non :tin -ptn William U. Berry On RR R/W lyg within W216' d b a Bill BerryInv E 1112329th Ave of Sd Tr Ig{5,(/L/ 3 rl Jerry G Tucker. _ E 15302 Valle Way Dr Vera B57 W1/2 Exc E177 i% Veradale feet & Exc W70' of E247.5-' E_15302 Valley Way Dr ,o-f_ N200'__ jy--i 1Spokane County Vera Ptn of GN R11q within W202' of B6'. RED TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS ADDITIO; ]]SONS PAYING TAXES (T) , 0 Cecil A Bugbee Vera E2/5 of W1/2 of N112 07r BIK 58 ERE 1,1200' Marion E Bugbee N 312 Progress Rd Ver dale of E115' t 1eritage Etal -''1 E 1.5303 Sprague I Vera Pt of B63-64; B63 Beg _ of SE Cur of B65 h 25' N In T& B Oil Co Inc Box 13280 Spokane W72' th N par to EL to pt cl 0 of Main Trk of SCDA&P RY ---r--1 "EtY Par Co bd ct to L-11 114 Ej rr intersection of Prod EL of W48' of Ptn S of SCDA&P James K Hanek E 15212 Valley Way Dr Vera-El/5 of N112 B58 n . 0-r James K Hanek c E 15'10 Valle Way Dr Vera E70' of 1,13/5 of NE N 11.00 Superior 1'1417 1/4 B58 y Alva E Dahl E 15206 Valley Way Dr Vera 143'/5 of NE 1/4 Exc E -1, Alva E Dahl E 15206 Valley Way Dr 70 B 58 j y,,w4L/ - /~,3// I. Phyllis Littlefield N 302 Progress Rd Vera S1/3 of W3/10 of N Phyllis Littlefield E 8120 1st Ave 1/2 B58 <</t/-/~i`~ U1~11I1~ lic:tl 11~ _,arbara J. Heritage (-uns. Harold tlielke Jr and L,!arciri Rae lfielke (H & W) - n - v i t~ T. -in e c- 12 a \ \ _1.4507 • N* ! I CARDER ~ I UE ~ w BRIDGE 90 0 ! N~1S06 • 14 ROA E> VVAY ~v E 13 Fire M oyes Station I Z d Sc hoo I-L ~tct r.o O rr. y a V A .L A Y w r4 R ar CC D / 9! 5 NRAGUt u log AV E HUE 0 A-- ad A r -T ON . LF "t VE ALE (cH.ar.PO Oka N A • • 91 E-216 FL L IE T W b~~ ' r - - - - I _ . F. . I -  . _ M ~ ~ i..,