Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-105-79
l SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Zone Reclassification Checklist Applicant's Nam AddrescL Telephone No _ ADD_ lira to 's 717 S/I) 9TP -qzi-O 2~ /©s-T9 v I PRE-APPLICATION FEE, ($10.00), RECEIPT NUMBER , (date) APPLICATION APPOINTMENT (date) (time) PART ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP. ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership) f~ ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION. ZONING WORKSHEET. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. PLOT PLANS (5 blackline) - (setbacks, road frontage, square footage, open space). PLOT PLAN TO GRAPHICS (date) PHOTOS (8 x 10 and description) SIGNS (4' x 4' ) APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER S ~0 (A t e) TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS PART II NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPES, ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT (date) STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FINDINGS PREPARED (da te) POST SURROUNDING AREA (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED (date) MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) FINDINGS MAILED_ TO APPLICANT (date) PART III HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED _ MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) SEPA's Notice of Action ~s SILL SLEETH 4zVPC los- May 16, 1979 Mr. Doug Adams Spokane County Planning Department West 1116 Broadway Spokane, WA 99201 RE 307 North Sullivan Road Variance Request Dear Mr. Adams, I am requesting a variance from the normal set-back requirements for the purpose of constructing a building in a residential office zone which we are attempting to establish at 307 North Sullivan Road I believe I can most easily explain the reasoning behind this request by relating the events that have lead to it. The 'property was recently purchased for the purpose of rezoning to "Residential Office", and the construction of a building thereon Upon purchasing the prop- erty it was noted that while the County had not taken frontage on Sullivan Road for road widening purposes for most of the length of Sullivan Road between the Freeway and Sprague Avenue, the County had taken ten feet from this property at a previous date. It was believed that this previous dedication was made to accomodate the plans of the Spokane County Traffic Engineer's Department Therefore it was not anticipated that further dedications would be required upon rezoning of the property. Building plans have been developed for a building having a depth of 36 feet to be placed on this site The site having a present depth of 90 feet would accomodate the building as we would also be required to set back 25 feet from the front line and 25 feet from the rear line, thus we would have 4 extra feet and would have fit within, the set back requirements in a residential zone Last week while initiating the rezoning process for the property I learned from Jack Finney at the Traffic Engineer's Department that they would be requiring an additional 7 to 10 feet of dedication from this property as a condition of zoning approval. Needless to say this was quite a surprise to me. If another 10 feet of this property is dedica- ted to the County for road widening purposes it leaves 80 feet of depth, of which 50 feet must be used for front and rear yard set back require- ments, leaving only 30 feet of buildable space. LVIN ffe L9FF IN(; . qLEAfTOS 717 Pines Rd Spokane, Washington 99206 - (509) 928-4220 REALTORi° 46, Page 2 Adams May lb, 1979 The building contractor, the owner, and myself, first tried to rough out plans for restructuring the building to fit within the 30 feet of buildable area left after the new dedication were made. Two problems occurred. The building had been designed to take advantage of maximum utilization of materials, and labor with a minimal waste factor It became evident quite early In our attempting to determine another way of building the building that the waste factor would be quite high, result- ing in roughly a five to ten thousand dollar additional cast in construc- tion materials and labor. The second problem is that because of the building's design the present plans cannot simply be altered but a whole new set of working drawings would have to be developed This would be a tremendous cost estimated to be in the vicinity of $3,500 to $7,500. You can see from these figures that we are facing an increased cost of producing this building of from $8,500 to $17,500 Mr Adams, l believe a hardship will truly be imposed upon us when the additional 7 to 10 feet is dedicated for Sullivan Road, I therefore am requesting a variance of from 3 to 6 feet, depending upon the final dedication requirement of the Engineer's Department I do not know how to make formal application for this variance and am therefore asking for some guidance. Thank you for your help in this matter Respect fuIIy, ALV I N J. WOL'FF, I NC Bill Sleeth Commercial/Investment Department OS/k l b z Z w = Q Q 3c%j Mr. Doug Adams Spokane County Planning Department West 1116 Broadway • Spokane WA 99201 moo C ~ r F- Ir11 r,r r+~ r+ r , + rr wr t u# r , , ~ : r' ,a Speed Letter., 44-902P f~'~r 'On )~/I r l7d~j°a~ !t ~ ~1#I+ Speed Letter. To From Subject Ons - ? / iZ OAI~4 C& 6 .r rrr, ~ ~ r-~a o Message ' 1 ` - C7~ Date _ inn - Reply Date - - - - - Wt{sonJanee r ~ ua~r►qw RETAIN WOVE COPY, RETURN P04K GQFY. 1277 ~R c JUL 979 ATTENTION: /arcia TOMLINSON AGENCY, INC. Spokane County Planning Conimi ss i or, W 606 - 3rd 721 N. Jefferson Spokane. WA 99204 Spokane, Washington AANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT . Inter-Office Communication Date July 11, 1979 TO Zonin Hearin committee-, Spokane FROM Eugene C Prathee~__, W_ SUBJECT Zoning actions, July, 1979 1 Concerning proposed zone changes ZN-53-79, ZE-25-79, ZE-58-79, ZE-66-79, ZE-72-79, ZE-105-79, ZW-6-79, ZW-82-79, we have no special comment h 2. Concerning PUDS-2-79, conditions of approval should include a Domestic and fire protection public water service provided by the City of Spokane (to be approved by Boundary Review Board, Spokane County), and b. A covenant to run with the land committing the owners to participate in and not protest assessments for an area-wide utilities local improvement district for sewers. It should be noted tnat excessive slopes for on-site sewage disposal may limit this development is C. S 0. "Bud" Aaker 681-9 South Meadows Road Spokane, WA 99203 A SA 410 FAi SCH-ADM-118 File # 't + Sec. / T'sh'p AS- R'ge Classification ,4G. Pro onent 6-, 1 ~p P ~O+ B IQ a a a ,,POKAME COUNIr CUUr.i jUUSf r ,IN A • L 1 } T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T 1 0 N ~2DOOSEU F14414Lr DECLARATION OF N00StGNIFtC•4•UC._ (proposed/final) (significance/non-significance) 1 Description of Proposal :2a,t,p- . I g to 7.r g F -T-0 AM-AMC-1 eQL*,_MuSTio.y OF ,4 S-may o FFLcOL Jj01 L.0(A.)G- OF W.60e" LGZU- n7ti 2 Proponent ~eLmoz+ cc :e(a,_r VC 3 Contact Person _:i~ A s[ee`f Phone (7V -AIz 26 v 4. County Action(s) Requested ✓ Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Other 5 Location of Proposal tAjFST" 5i O& O F s uLj_ I vAA-) P-o,-p J:Zp, t SOLM4 rig ate" w~4 y IVOi2TH o F sPirsu~. hoc' 6 Lead Agency SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to -.06-1 have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is NOT- required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c) This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency 7 Responsible Official Proposed Declaration Final Declaration Name'j=Q,E0 L, t-} Name 1&"e4A &,awwtcdy Signature Signature 00 Title 0-DiaLao Z Title C44AIp-mq.,O Department Co ?LAru&)t#U G-- Department Ae.4ieiA) 6 e-K. coWtu- Date A 'TV j q 71 Date A &A 44 Revised 6/1/79 8 For Declaration of Significance Only / Date of Expected Draft EIS Available (determined by Responsible Official) / Date of I ssuance TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL a Brief description and listing of those environmental impacts leading to such declaration b Brief explanation of what measures, if any, could be taken by the applicant to prevent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of non-significance a i AGENDA, JULY 19, 1979 TELEPHONE NO. 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Time: Thursday, July 19 , 1979, 1.30 P.M. Place- Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane ZON RECLASSIFICATION 8. ZE-105-79. Agricultural to Residential Office a , Location- Section 14 , Township 25 N , , Range 44 , E . W . M That portion of Block 57 of Vera, beginning 203 feet south of the northeast corner; thence West 100 feet; thence South 207.5 feet; thence East 100 feet; thence_ North 207.5 feet to the Point of Beginning, EXCEPT the East 10 feet. b. Vicinity Location: West of Sullivan Road, approximately 200 feet south of Valley Way. C. Applicant- Robert E. Blair, c/o Bill Sleeth South 717 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206 d. Site Size- 18,675 square feet e. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established March 27, 1942 f. Proposed Zoning- Residential Office 9. Proposed Use of Property: Office Building h. Application of Zoning Provision Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 i, Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-330(2) provides that " , . . In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E. 1. S. shall be prepared. " -9 - W to C^TA BRIDGE 90 9 o a N4430B ,W AV E .d atl BROADWAY AV E I~ 13 Fire r ogresA 5tation . AL I I Sc noo a Y sec r a h o e a St;' ~I VALLEYW~ II: C VALL~ WAY ~ h Z a in ~ W OA~1N 0 w m MOIN r AIN AV[ s - 41 r Y Z SAO g ® Z v t g R~ SPRAGUE J~J U 7 N° 2312 a ~ PICKY VE vE LE o lam, q„~ rCM 6r P#P RR ra 5r call St m r Pa f oCht wo m Stt~ool o po m x V Z CbJa~l W , ~ 1N a ~ _ 101 > 111 004a vc, raw I BRIDGE N ourl in d L7 6 •M AVE 2 m 'M W 6~ / LIE W4S09 AO unlt ,y`~~ ~ A J e ~f~i+ Tr% : ~ ~6FfT W AVE `/xr ~,1• I/y'11` • • . 1 ~ ~ 6 ~ j~.•f.Cjf Yi ~ O 1 . ~~o g aTM rate'/ 1 t~ !1 1 IDYN 1, 6IT" AVE. File No. ZE-105-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on July 19 , 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman, Abby Byrne and John Culler and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural to Residential Office, for the purpose of an office building. B. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Robert E. Blair for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application, is hereby continued indefinitely at the request of the sponsor; and that any future advertising expense which is involved for another hearing shall be borne by the sponsor. Motion by: John Culler Seconded by: Abby Byrne Vote: UNANIMOUS HEARIN EXAMINER COMMITTEE h r n ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By- J 1 ' 5POI~ANt- VALLt(l FIRt DtPARTAENT EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE O SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 C TELEPHONE (509) 978-1700 r'/& el July 9, 1979 Mr. Fred Dayharsh, Planning Director Spokane County Planning Commission Second Floor Broadway Centre Building N721 Jefferson Spokane, %shington 99260 Dear Mr. Dayhar-sh: g~ kla a been reviewed for fire protection* The following Zone Cha U 4rE-72-79 Brecto an e_ ZE-25-79 McCarthy Inc, ZE-66-79 Bonuc eld, _ 7 ZE-105-79 Blair The above gr}eeirf se 4n h dra is id-stalled in their areas. -access pl a~ s for'-~jrefi hti a uiome °'t round the building sbal 1 If ( r4 o-,~tt~ bu' 1 di ng-,pe ,mi t;,i ssuance. be app ro e S i`n ce rel 17~- y Cook Lt.- of Inspectors ~C • sn t ~ 1 .AREYENT FIRES SAVE LIVES STAFF ANALYSIS July 19 , 1979 2E-105-79, AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDEN IAL OFFICE BLAI The applicant has requested that this request for a zone reclassification be continued indefinitely. I) 1 i PLANNING DEPARTMENT ai BROADWAY CF-aaTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET r r PHONE 456-2205 t, e- V~I~ 1 ~ ► SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 9,9260 SPOKA"C 2,*un;v G,2UR- m0USr_ CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: D0a d- Va tau Kc- k E ju vise. 44EA &zr k V ~~Va 02). 4E,A`r RE.al t.. m e F t ICE ~ 'tie W-T 0 FROM- Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention, /)A kp.CIA R At &)F .S r REFERENCE: Lead Agency Destination, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following protect: 2,2 - 10S-- 79 t 4to S~4_y on IFIcy D& This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided in WAC 197-10-3470 ,(5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on A ;10L. V , irk1 . Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for -it '_TL1 _Lg_ 1q7!3 The subject proposal or action (IS, Imo) LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIG- NATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQU'I FER ENVIRON- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 12081 STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GWI E) should be prepared. Enclosures Rev. 4/17/79 FILE #-/0 19 I v r t r 1 + - STAFF JIM, EW OF EIIIVIRQNMEiV_TAL C HECKLIST r svOKAN[ COYN?r COUNT "OUSC I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and 4ny additionalZertine t by the At r & h - _ 4--ni T data has subsequently been reviewed e _ The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action (s) Requested: 4. Zone Change; _ Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval; = Change of Condition Other: B. Description of Proposal: Q = C. Location of Proposal: azk'~ H. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the follojAnng questions o (1) A 'Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) = Air (9) Natural (16) Utilities Resources (3) ter (10) v Risk, of (17) , Human Upset Health (4), Flora (11) _ Population (18) Aesthetics (5) _ Fauna (12) Housing (19) Rec. (6) Noise (13) . Trans./ (20) -Arch./ Circ. His t . (7) Light & (14) PuAlic (21) Other Glare Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: -s A r 6 a9&/ f~ _ ~5-/, t~/Y 11)VA4 C /.-r -.4-% A-14 16- - a ez C . Discussion of Impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A.. Conclud at there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and ecom~nen sues a proposed declaration of nonstgnificance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because Of the nature of the proposal, recommends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C..~.._ Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist a-.-Id recommends/issues a declaration of significance. IV Staff member(s,) reviewing checklist At p ? •D •I N r ~ o ~ RFF jg, -A IL ! sao j~9p Z = ANJET- w it - c,sTa Q er BRIDGE .90 01 N94506 Id z Q MA of 4 ~w m A V E ra ad 14 BROADWAY AVE e► r Vr Fore ogres Station • 1 ~ St noo ~ ~ o . 1 Q +10 ' Sect r a , a Sc ~I VAL LEY%4 10 . V^LLEI(I wA Y • dl 1 r Q ' F W M441M 0 w Maur r MAID AYE _ ~ 01 G ~ JL- - - SPRIE u 2312 q1; w • o a E PLAELT-Av vE ALE - 0 jw~ ♦ qva ~ (cw► Sr P~P RR xm_ . =go AV E ?N ar m S+ m arechs U) T V end Z ~ C/ a 4 Seca co. ourt N G 67 6*M AVE 2 ~~T 0R1DGE m 6 EILE N4450s ae c~~k ,TK `ADAM` wtip ~VQI ey ~LAXE ~rHp C Nit - 6 ~ •1•y N~t• • I S,R. a ` C.I. 9A ]go b to T WM w { - 1 PAV,Tr---1 r= P 1 i I File ~ ~C-/~ S > 7 Ir 3 ENVrRONMEMAL 0ECKL:ST Sec. -Twp .-RgL . 4_zr_,~ u CZY , I it =ntroduction The State cnvironmental Policy Act of 1971 Cheater 43 21C. RCA, requires all state and ioe_i governmental 39mencit3s to consider anvironmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private prooosals The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statertit be prepared for all major actions significantly (and aaverseiv', as Per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of "he ahysical invironpLant The purpose of this checklist is to niep the =gencies in- volved determine wnetner at not a proposal is such a m Jor action Please answer the following questions as cappletely as you can with the intortiation presently available to you Please answer questions as "yes" or "aeybe' if, in your opinion even only slight facts will result The reviewers or the checxlist will be aiware of and concern rhecrselves with the degree of ompact, asking you for more information, if necessary .there explanations of your answers ar± -equired or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-;n31iter: incluae your explanation in the space Provided. or use-additional aaces, it necAs_sarv You should incluae references to any -evorts or studies of which you are aware and .rhich are relevant to the answers you provide Carralece answers to these questions ,cw will help all agencies in%olved ditty your proposal to undertaKe the required environmental review xtthout innzcessary ael,ay The following questions apply to your total Proposal not Just to the license for which you are currently applying or the pro- posal for which approval is sought 'our answers should include the imaacts which wilt be taus-ed by your proaosal when it is cnitiolet.ed even though comoletion clay riot occur until sometime in the future This .rill allow all of the agencies whicn will ba invol4e4 to comoiecan -heir environsencal review ncre, without duplicating oaoerwork in the ruture 4o aaplication snail re processed until the checklist has bean completed and returned fo the aopropriate County departrent State law requires ~xaIa"ticns -a- every " es' and 'r Ybe" answer on the checklist The Person cowleting the fore may o>e required to provide 2xp anal ons -or no answers, and to some oases more detailed inforiiiation to aid in a threshold determination NOTE This is a standard °ornl being used by all state and local agencies fn the State of Washington for various types or proposals '-any of the questions irny not apply to Your Proposal if 3 auestion does not apply, just answer it 'no' and continue on to :he next question :11V IRMIrENTAI. CHECKLIST FORM I SA GROUND I 'lame or Prooonent RoLFw 13~,r.1 v 7U 1-3_ 1 Phone +3unber Z Address of Proponent .S- -S' pl c? 1;2 o 3 Date Checklist SuMoitted t d Agency Requiring Checklist -L t. Oy f)6 ,t .ft J4 'lane or Prooosai, I; Apo Ifceoie Z .0, b 'iaLure and Brief Oescription of the ronosai includino auc not inited ro its s1ze, genera sesign ateiients ant other actors -hoc will give an accurate understanding as its scope and nature] 4E Z_ C sI e / 4 9. _sr r 7 J x , i - 1 o", c v -gxiol , 4 C .4 D7 4t; ` ~ 1L?~" I t r t±~ir'1 ' t Ca 'r Location of Proposal (describe :he physical setting of the Orooosai, as ,tell as tre extant of .ne land area grAact2d !)y an °_nvironrpenLL) iaipact3, lnCluoin nn ocher inTO c~i,on needed tD7 v2 an accurate unaerstandti~9 or~s re environ- mentai getting of the proposal) ''~`~"7y Al, 4M.,a&•~ >~~st+~'i/ ft~C G~'~eyf4 3 Es ti ;rated Date for Cocrro i etion or the Proposal _ S a V 1.1 4j 9 List of. all Permits, Licenses or Government aeprovals Requi-40 -or the prop sal (fede i state ana local - inc°uaino lid rezones) C"t ar ~ J Wir 7- .-7 Oc «y.A ...r (-r SPACE FOR EXPLAVATION 15 tKAOC-QUATE aLASE gTiAG4 ..DOMONAL PACES 1 10a go you or the owner in the event you do not own -lie sub,icc: land nave any Plans tar ruture addi►+ons excansion, or -urther * vity related +o or connected with this pralwsai7 t° yes, explain 10b Do fou oxen or nave options an land nearby or adjacent =o this proaosai i location? to' yes, exotain X/O 11 Do you enow oT 3ny plans by others including the owner hicn ,;ay affect tree Property covered by your aroaosal or lane 1/1% adjacent or nearoy' f yes explain 12 Attach any other aool,cation rorM char nos been cowleced reaardino :he orcoosai, if none nas wean _omolaced buc is exoec-ed co be filed at some future dace, describe the nature of suc+1 eo0iication la m It Ei V I ROHME11TAL UMPAC-i S (Exoldnazions of ail "yes" ano "mayoe" answers are required) (_s Mayoe 'i0 1 earth Will the proposal result in (a) Unstable earth concitions or in cn3ngas to a_Ptogic 5L7LC-ores' (5) Oisruoeions disoiacements, comoac_ion or ov_reoverina of the sail' ►'3,e'r•u~ ~`>&"h&_Ly _ (z) Change in topography at ground sue ace relief `eaturesl 1 _ (d) The destruction, coverinq or nodification if any umoue ceotouic or onysicai reaturesi (a_) Any i,nc-ease in wind or water a-rasion or soils, either on or Off the s+tel _ 2- A (If SPAC &XoUIWTIQ`I IS INADEQUATE, PLEAS: ArACH ADDI P4GZS ) thanges in deposition or erosion of bertn sands or changes in siltatior depo4ition or erosion wnicn Tay rmdi',v the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the Ocean or an/ bay, inlet or lake' Explanation 2 Air .ill: the proposal result In Yes tl y0e 4o (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality' - (b) The creation of objectionable odors? (c) Alteration of ~ir ement, moisture ortwperature, or any change In either v or regionally? te f~-•- Exala^ nation ec_/7&-.'5-G,W f' t- C, tax Gzc6f r C" 17"d /t~ 3 'Rater 'dill the prooosal result in Yes !~Ybe NO (a) Change in Lurrents, or the course or direction of attar movements in either marine or fresh watersl - (b) Changes in aasorption rates, drainage patters or the rate and amount of surface water runorf? ~ (c) alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? - (d) Change in the amount of surface water In any water body' zt_r (e) Discharge disurface ssolved ity.oinciudno but water, not lior fi mited any alteration to temperature, of qual oxygen or turbidity? (f) Alteration of me direction or rate of `low of ground waters' (g) Change in the quantity of gourd raters nigher tnrough direct additions or iithdrawais. or -hrough tntercept=on of an aquifer by cuts or excavations' (h) Deterioratioh In grouna water quality either chrouah direct injection or through the seepage of leacnate pnosoates detergents. sacerborne virus or bacteria or other substances - into she Sound watery (r) 4eduction `n the arnunt of .later otherwise availaole for publi water suovliez' L& M r J =lora Will the proposal result, in Yrs M~voe NO (a) Change in the diversity or species, or n:amer of any species of flora (including gees, shrubs, grass. cross, m croflora and aquatic plants)? - - (D) Reduction of the nutters of any unique rare or endangered species of floras (c) introduction of new species or flora into an area or in a carrier to the nphmi replenishment of esist,ng spec es? (d) geauction in acreage of any agriculturai croo? - Exolanation 5 -auna 14111 -he proposal -esult in Yes "iayae `to (a) Changes in 'he diversity of ~.oecies. or nurser of any species of fauna (birds, land animais including reptiir-s, `isn and ,neilfisn, benthic organises, insects or microfauna)7 - (b) '2eouction of the otmers of any unique. rare, or endangered soecies of rauna? -(c) introduction of new species of `awe into an area. or result in a Barrier co the migration or moveswen= of sauna? - (d) Det,ricration of existing `ish or wildlite haoitat? - txolanation 6 Aoi s e YY_s N1yb° 'i0 (a) dill the propcs l incrsase ~x•stino n i e levels? - - w 1 1A b C;_1 ~X P b' :eel anation orl c~ A ~ i !_iant :nd Clare fes Mavoa 10 (a) 410 the proposal produce new liont or 913rQ7 - ` Exclanation a~~.J f, tir r Al, 44 1 Ji eiLet=,e14U__,eC ~a l ea,.~.~ E~J Ccs ~tS 2. 19FRw- (IF SPn__ rOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH A NAL PAGES ) 8 Land Use Yes Nayoe 40 (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use or an area? Exolanati n ->-o &-I e 4", 12C Co ,S ~C 1~7 14 -17 D V& S 9 Natural Resources Will the proposal result in Yes Maybe No (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? - -A- (b) Depletion or any nonrenewable natural resource? - Explanation 10 Risk of Uoset Does the proposal involve a resk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe No release o hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? Explanation 11 Population Yes Maybe No Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? _ Explanation 12 Housing Will the proposal atfect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing' Explanation 13 Transportation/Circulation Will the proposal result in Yes maybe No (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement?, (b) Eflec:s on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? (c) Imoact upon existing transportation systems? (d) Alterations to present oatterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? _ (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles. bicyclists or pedestrians? Exolanation r(Lar (J -/Te& 14 bt ►z 'r-&- 1 4 Pupiic Services Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result Yes Mayoe No in a need tor new or altered governmental services in any of of the following areas (a) Fire Protection? kb) Police protection? - (c) Schools' (a) Parks or other recreational facilities' (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? - (f) Other governmental services? Explanation (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, OLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES 15 Energy Will the proposal result in tes Mayoe No (a) Use of suostantial amounts of fuel or energy? - (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy or require the development or new sources of energy? Explanation w~/ E S E 16 Utilities Will *he proposal result in a need for new systems, Yes Mavbe No or alterations `o tie followina utilities (a) Power or natural gas? - X (b) Communication systems? - X rc) Water? (d) Sewer or septic tanks? 11. (e) Storm water drainages -2s - 3 ( E FOR CXPLAAATICN IS INADEQUATE, °LEsSE ATTHC 10`AL PAG'S ) (f) Solid waste and disposals - Explanation C 7~ /Py-L C'X~ Yes Nayee No 17 4uman Health Will the proposal result to the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? r Explanation 13 Aesthetics Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site oxen to public view? - Exola-lation 19 Recreation Will the proposal result in an impact upon the ciality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? r Explanation 20 Archeolo ical/4istorical Will the oroposal result in an alteration of a Yes Maybe No significant arcneo ogical or historical site. structure, object or budding? Exolanation I I I SIGNATURE I the undersigned. swear under the penalty of perjury that the above resporses ara made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge I also understand that, should there be any willful misreo-esentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my oart.Spokane County may withdraw any declaration o` nensicnificance that it mig',t issue i'i ^eliance upon this checklist Date Proponent Jje4,v( J (Please Print or Type) Proponent VIC-V e! lf + 131"or o Address 91 v t vt Phone 92-e - ~6 n CC aerson completing form _ Phone CJ -422 Date ~e Department or Office of County Reviewing Checklist Staff Memberis) Reviewing Checklist RECEIPT Date- Received From Q ~ _ ress V /~yI ~ ,y Dollars µl/e~ For ACCOUNT HOW FAIL) &AN#; COWN-rbt PLANNING DZPFL:,iJ-.AT AMT. OF CASH ACCOUNT AMT PAID CHKK BALANCE m:t N dF?' DUE ~}RGEi~ $x"6 Redifprm 0 FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date Application No ZE-105-79 Name of Applicant Robert E. Blair, c/o Bill Sleeth Street Andress of Applicant S. 717 Pines Road City Spokane State WA 99206 Telephone No 928-4220 Existing Zoning Classification Agricultural Date Existing Zone Classification Established 1942 s314 1 C~ Existing Use of Property Residence Proposed Zone Classification Residential Office Proposed Use of Property Office Building Legal Description of Property That portion of Block 57 of Vera, beginning 203 feet south of the Northeast corner, thence West 100 feet, thence South 207.5 feet, thence East 100 feet, thence North 207.5 feet to the Point of Beginning, EXCEPT the East 10 feet. Section 14 Township' 25 N. i Range 44, EWM Source of Legal Deed Assessors Parcel Number (See Tax Statement) 14544-1203 Property Size.- 207.5 x 90' - 18,675 square feet Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor Street Address of the Property- au] K; ~f r Who Holds Tale to the Propezty If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your intr%rest in it9- VAt-Lt'd, L, Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of sub?ecc property _1- • Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED 1 What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? ~~r "%-Sreikb-gi,~ A/10a;~ ~4 1 ath43 f' dL✓ic f ~ 1 ~c~~~dd1S ~L:4we dy s~~ -t 'lam w7rti~c~IP~4► i cd~ p~lr~ tVvT'4 !e. 7'C. ~L►sK p „ t 0 b y~1 y .f h'...~ItcVPGa+f".4.8 4~4..~~?_~O.~b~'/~,/~~ ~°?o.7Scafl~i~tiDiQy- Jo WP ~~Gla`W 8''® /4~A1O 'I kG i C $J J Ali t Tt P L L C. .a .t' e-r .~8edsd~ N~ ~ankk?Lk~tl~ cant CY^~ p,-Of tic 44 kC. J ~1 t1 d «c $j- dam I`~ga~ as ~~o.~~/C►oxx ~ r l6~va~ Ir~..A . 4A q f ~ 1 t &4 ! ~t(,..~yl .%A p, t 11e 1~'ct -r 1 0 .5~~ ~F ) t 'y~Ey-t' f k~ Y'~ >t C 1 , / (a 1 C' °l ppy VLu V 1~i V'`a C la.~ d r'71~ t i 1 N"~ Y IJ i e 9 e pia VM a a. , e ed C5 1 k &ao a k ►ua 1& f4d m't /tl~ IV~m w^7Yit lCL~ 2 VThat of ec~ wi`lY thekVpropo~ sed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties k m X4..6 I G~'17 ° Kl F / ! b 3 14' , 144 ° e- 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) e 4.1 ft It. C' C t 4 tr I. the undersigned, swear under the penalty of peraury 'Ehat the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington t ,yv f (Signed) 6 ' f (Date) ~ 1 - 2 - r ~ ZONING WORKSHEET FORM C Application # ,_'e ~~,)5 1 This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to resent a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and deter- mination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District requirements. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed below.) PAgT ~===~4_~~ SQi~le~.~S~~Y_~Qokan~ ~4S~LL~~_~P~ll1~.€[ A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: _yes no. 2) ez access to be limited to : ,L`, 3) Access permit is required. 4) a. ~~edication for right-of-way is required. feet on t-v Road, Street, Avenue.) b. __Radius ( foot) is required. (On and - Road, Street, Avenue) c. Slope easement is required along 5) ainage Plan is required. on-site off-site. 6) aving permit is required.( feet on Road . ) 7) f:i--Curb is required, (along Road, Street, Avenue. ) 8) Sidewalk is required. (along Road, Street, Avenue. ) 9) pplicant must be willing to participate in future 10) Legal description is acceptable as reviewed. Parcel No. !y5 /a2 a 31, Comments: Sig a Date ZONING WORKSH"-7--continued-2 A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Utilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development a's not located in a public sewer service area operated and. maintained by Spokane County. 2) A storm drainage plan -is not required for the proposal. Comments: S ned Date 2ARI X11__ U-be. r.Q -P!e td_by--5aQEaog ~ uatY-VAler_Rur tyor: A . Water Supply 1) The proposed development is located with the ,,iA 1L'14 T E1` 4 1 " ►wt i district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agiseement/arrangement la,as/has not been made to serve this proposal. 3) We are/aoe-fwt able to supply this development with adequate potable water. 4) We are/a e=*mir, able to supply this development with adequate water for fire flow. 5) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other: 6) Water system 4/is not under State Utilities jurisdiction. i } Indicate size of main for hook up:~ inches. 8) Distance to maim. feet. B. to be :0com leted b A lic nt 1) Individual water supply will be developed with/41110M fire protection capabilities . Comments: Signed Date C. If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Department of Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to application. 1) I /We have reviewed the proposal. It appears to meet State require- ments for public water. Signed - D.S.H.S. . ZONING WOR KSH `T--continued-3 PST 1V to t~„~ ~ompiet~r.~_t~y_~pokar~e_CQu~t.y_F±re Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District 2) ZleS Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Zo ' Fire flow is/ s not ade uate for q proposed development anc~' i~~s not required. - 4) 4 /C, Main(s) need to be installed. 5) ~ 2.s7 Hydrant(s) need to be installed. 6) Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) 7) Z111, J cMearest fire hydrant is feet. S) Driving distance to nearest fire station is Comments: -io 17 k~_ -signed Date P _11__y -~o ~k e_complg ~.d_bY_ 512oKa ,.@ L i2tY_Ng_1t~1_P t~ A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: , 2) Air quality is/ ' not concern with this proposal. 3) Ground water quality Ps not a concern with this proposal. 4) Noise is/ no a concern with this proposal. 5) Lights not a concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: fined Date t. PRE-APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Dater L y/~ Application No: zE -ICY'- /-7 Name of Applicant: ~~L r - LS t~ ! c _ .S e Street Address of Applicant: r7 l '1 t': es City: , . State: - i Telephone No. 9Z~ - YZ Zip Code: r n Existing Zoning Classification: qO''/C l Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Z- Existing Use of Property:- s c~ Q Lt C f- Proposed Zone Classification: -iL-W//x' Use of Property: D i CC P i Legal Description of Property: U~°~►a~1 ` r Lc- -t CA t LA OV-4 e --c- e Z 4.1 t to C fs~CA 4e V".%, ljovf~ C', C k TG C co v ( kavt C ti A C') Section: Townshilz Range: fzl/ Source of Legal: Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) - _ •5 u ' l' ~3 I Fro G e t-t v Size: ~ .,a ~ # ~ ~ o-.; i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ xi w m i p a S~%J i l w ..m , " ~ , „ " 3 ._..w w . ,.......p... ~ q ~ E ? E T E a 2 ~ n r ~.y.. d~ y. f 'Pttl Pty v A, pj i ~h . F ~ r P!. .ti w ~ E Mfg E re a d w + ~ ~ , ~1 r . ~ , " ~ M ~ E ~ ~ "r, d q @ E• i. g ~ ~ ~ E d 3, as m, r as-." w.:+ ~w...." „ S y'PC7 e . Y < Rte..) ~ i ~ ,.d 3 a ,4R J' ' x t 'w P J ~ p x"~t 8 ~ . 5...~'~ . r ~ ,...M < ~ re 3 p 9 6 j C r 8 G~ ~ ~ ~ ate. P !"Y' F ~ ~ y ^7 " C ~ ~.,m , m, ~ , w. ,q r.7 ` I - , a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ a 5 y . I P . [ e ' 55 ~e IMF ~c q9" 'b f E \ A. " ~ ~ f , ~ ~.«G i ' ~ ~ w ~ m ~ " " s " .._..w w , . ~ a f , P Po , s ~ " P " ff x... ' ~ ~ ~ ~ w o ~ p r ? a.. ~ ~ " 3 ~ ~ R ~ - ( ~a ~ ~ 3 x v y ~ & vz .r. s " , ~ ~ ~ a y . ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ " a ~ w ~ " a r ~ ~M ~ ~ . ~ i _ ~ ga, ~ ' ' ~ o k.: : u F p ' ~ ` ~ ' q _ mow... ~ pp ~c _ , MS.: & " ~ " yE f.~ 11 i g ~ YY r ~ ~ ~N s. i € y, g ~ I I r. ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ a~ ~ t p „~~~gg a „ a . < w ~ / y , p„~`Iro'~ g~ ;.yld it ~/Y '.Y. ,f y "S 2'~ rj ~M ~ ~ q~° ~ n ...q.. " ~ G ~5 :ems 1 - 3 a ~ ~ i, r y, a , a~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ , , .,w ~ E «M ~ ~ ~f ~ y r t} PP ~ , , Y r m._^! ~ t ! P r ~,t r ~ ~ re ~ \ ~ ~ 3 ~ , 3 a. . „ w . ~ ~ ~ aC".$ a r P<r~ ~ ~ - ~ , ~ s b 88dd a. r~ P f". ~ a P. ~ ~ ar 6 ~ 3 s. " { 999""" " W R r ~ ' - ~ m'" ~ ~ as i ~ < y .ar 5 ~ a ~ _ " ~ „ ff " M__., . " M.. . . d w~ ~ v p, a 4d, I ~1 w. M , .;b r~ P : r r w4y ,s ~ w .w m . j 1 i m a x ~v..... _ _ s ~a ~y;.