The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-222-79 RELEASE OF PUBLIC RECORDS Spokane County Division of Building & Planning Request to inspect public records Request for copies of public r ds Name of Requester: Title of Record: v~ vZ a ZZ No. of Copies: Total Fee: File Provided By: File Not Available: Lost File Already Checked Out Other Reason: Staff Signa e: Date: r a• SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER 0 ru-F--~ W 00d RE: Change of Conditions to a Prior Zone ) Reclassification, in the Light Industrial ) FINDINGS OF FACT, (I-2) Zone; ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, Applicant: Ron Mackie ) AND DECISION File No. ZE-222B-79 ) This matter coming on for public hearing on March 6, 2002, the Hearing Examiner, after review of the change of conditions application and the entire record, and finding good cause therefore, hereby makes the following findings of fact, conclusions of law and decision: I. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The application requests a change of conditions to a prior zone reclassification, in the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, to delete the requirement for public hearing review of a specific site plan for the westerly 245 feet of the site, modify the requirement for a 10-foot high landscaping berm, and allow the development of warehouse uses on the site. 2. The site is generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue, in the SE 1/4 of Section 8, Township 25 North, Range 44 EWM, Spokane County, Washington. 3. The site is currently designated as County Assessor's tax parcel no. 45084.0227. The site is legally described as that portion of the north half of Tract 266 of Opportunity, according to the plat recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, page 20, records of Spokane County Auditor, lying south of Knox Avenue and east of Woodruff Road, excluding the South 54 feet of the north half of said Tract 266. 4. The applicant for the proposal is Ron Mackie, 9802 East Mission Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206. The owner of the site is Rude Enterprises, 717 West Sprague Avenue, #1600, Spokane, WA 99201. 5. The Hearing Examiner heard the application pursuant to the County Hearing Examiner Ordinance (County Resolution No. 96-0171) and the County Hearing Examiner Rules of Procedure (County Resolution No. 96-0294). 6. The Hearing Examiner conducted a site visit on March 5, 2002. A public hearing was held on the proposed change of conditions on March 6, 2002. The requirements for notice of public hearing were met. 7. The following persons testified at the public hearing: Tammy Jones Ron Mackie Division of Planning 9802 East Mission Avenue 1026 West Broadway Spokane, WA 99206 Spokane, WA 99260 HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 1 8. The County Division of Planning issued a Determination of Nonsignificance for the proposal on March 1, 2002. 9. The Hearing Examiner takes notice of the County Generalized Comprehensive Plan, GMA Comprehensive Plan and Capital Facilities Plan, GMA Comprehensive Plan map, Phase I development regulations, County Resolution Nos. 1-1033 and 2-0037, County Arterial Road Plan maps, County official zoning maps, County Zoning Code, County Code, other applicable development regulations, and prior land use decisions in the vicinity. 10. The record includes the documents in File Nos. ZE-222-79, ZE-222A-79 and ZE-222B-79 at the time of the public hearing; the testimony and documents submitted at the public hearing; and the items taken notice of by the Examiner. 11. The site is approximately 3.93 acres in size and is not improved with any buildings. An existing paved driveway with adjacent retaining wall extends through the east portion of the site from Knox Avenue to adjoining property to the east, a driveway and existing landscaping extend along the west border of the site, existing landscaping is found along the north border of the site, and a block retaining wall and existing landscaping are found along the south border of the site. The westerly driveway serves adjacent property to the south, and accesses Knox Avenue at the northwest comer of the subject property. The site is generally flat, except for an eight (8)-foot rise in elevation between the driveway and Woodruff Road. 12. On April 14, 1980, 7.5 acres of land, consisting of the site and the adjacent parcel to the south, were rezoned from the Agricultural (A) zone of the now expired County Zoning Ordinance to the Restricted Industrial (RI) zone. The rezone decision adopted the conditions of approval recommended by the Planning Department, in its staff report dated 4-10-80, except for two of the County Engineering conditions. The decision also added some new conditions to protect the residential neighborhood to the west. See County Hearing Examiner decision adopted on April 14, 1980 in File No. ZE-222-79, (erroneously attested to on "3-14-80'). 13. The site plan for the 1980 rezone illustrated development of the easterly 390 feet of the original 7.5 acres for sales, service, engineering and repair of diesel engines (Cummins Northwest Diesel). This included a 1-story building of 43,681 square feet, with a maximum height of 40 feet, and with areas for trailer parking illustrated along the east property line and also west of the building. The site plan showed the westerly 245 feet of such parcel as undeveloped. 14. The conditions of approval for the 1980 rezone provided that future development on the westerly 245 feet of the property between Knox Avenue and I-90 by any future building will be for an office business park". Such conditions also required the developer to submit a specific site development plan for the review and approval of the hearing body, prior to issuance of a building permit for development of the westerly 245 feet of the subject parcel. The conditions further prohibited access to Woodruff Road, required a 6-foot high fence at the southwest edge of the building, and required a 10-foot berm and 6-foot high plantings to be installed 130 feet west of such building. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 2 15. Effective January 1, 1991, the zoning of the 7.5 acres rezoned in 1980 was reclassified to the Light Industrial (1-2) zone, pursuant to the Program to Implement the Spokane County Zoning Code. The Program to Implement specifically preserved, as a condition of the new I-2 zoning, the conditions of approval of the 1980 rezone that were more specific or strict than the development standards of the new zone. See County Resolution No. 85-09010, Program to Implement 16. On February 16, 2000, the Hearing Examiner approved a change of conditions to the 1980 rezone for the adjacent parcel to the south. The decision authorized the development of ,iii office/warehouse use on such parcel, changed the configuration of the building and other improvements shown on the site plan for the 1980 rezone, and authorized the installation of 1 feet of Type I landscaping along the west boundary of the parcel in lieu of the required berm an plantings. The decision required primary access to such parcel from Knox Avenue, with an allowance for restricted access along Woodruff Road. See Hearing Examiner decision in File No. ZE-222A-79. 17. On December 21, 2001, the applicant submitted a complete application for a change of conditions to the 1980 rezone for the current site. The application is appropriate under the change of conditions process set forth in Section 14.504.040 of the County Zoning Code. 18. The site plan of record for the change of conditions submitted dated May 25, 2001 illustrates phased development of the site and adjoining property to the south and east, with the site developed last. The site plan shows a 24,112 square foot, single-story building for office/warehouse use on the site, associated parking, landscaped banks, existing monument sign; and also shows the existing landscaping, driveways and retaining walls. The driveway entrance in the northeast portion of the site is indicated as the main entry point to the joint development, and the driveway in the northwest corner of the site is indicated as a secondary entry. The site plan illustrates existing office/warehouse uses and parking on the adjoining parcels to the south and east, and a future parking area on land located further to the east along Knox Avenue. 19. The change of conditions would retain the existing landscaping on the site and extend an existing, 6-foot high, sight-obscuring, chain link fence along the west boundary of the site from the adjacent property to the south. The proposed building would have a maximum height of 20 feet. 20. Effective January 15, 2002, the County adopted County Resolution No. 2-0037. Such resolution implemented a new Comprehensive Plan ("GMA Comprehensive Plan"), a Capital Facilities Plan, County Urban Growth Area (UGA) boundaries, and Phase I Development Regulations; all pursuant to the State Growth Management Act. Such resolution also repealed the interim development regulations previously adopted by the County under the State Growth Management Act. 21. The Phase I Development Regulations designate the land lying north of Interstate 90 in the area, east of Woodruff Road, including the site, in the Light Industrial category of the Comprehensive Plan; and retained the I-2 zoning of the site and such land. Such regulations designated the land lying west and southwest of the site, which is developed for single-family homes, in the Low Density Residential category of the GMA Comprehensive Plan, and HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 3 reclassified the zoning of such land from the Urban Residential-3.5 (UR-3.5) zone to the Urban Residential-7 (UR-7) zone. An office/industrial park is located north of the site. 22. Section 13.300.110 of County Resolution No. 1-0700 provides that absent statute or ordinance to the contrary, the regulations in effect on the date a complete application is submitted and fees are paid will be the standard of review for a project permit application. 23. Within the UGA, the Phase I Development Regulations provide limited "vested rights" for rezone, conditional use permit, variance and special permit applications that were complete prior to January 15, 2002. Such regulations do not reference change of condition applications, in this regard. 24. Washington case law provides that submittal of a conditional use permit application vests the right to use and develop the property in the manner disclosed in the application according to the land use laws and regulations in effect on the date the application was filed. See Weyerhaeuser v. Pierce County, 95 Wn. App. 883, 976 P.2d 1279 (1999), review denied 139 Wn.2d 1001 (1999). The holding in the Weyerhaeuser case regarding vested rights is broad enough to include the current change of conditions application. Accordingly, the current application is subject to review under the County Generalized Comprehensive Plan and the development regulations in place on December 21, 2001, the day the application was complete. 25. The Interstate 90 freeway is located directly south of the adjacent parcel to the south, with its travel lanes located well below the grade of the current site. The County Arterial Road Plan in the Comprehensive Plan designates Montgomery Avenue, located approximately 1,000 feet north of the site, as a Minor Arterial. All other roads in the vicinity are considered Local Access roads, including Woodruff Road, Shannon Avenue and Knox Avenue. 26. The site is designated in the Industrial category of the County Generalized Comprehensive Plan. The subject property also lies inside the Aquifer Sensitive Area, Priority Sewer Service Area and Urban Impact Area designated by the Generalized Comprehensive Plan. 27. Prior to January 15, 2002, the site was located inside the interim urban growth area boundaries designated by the County pursuant to the State Growth Management Act. 28. The Staff Report adequately analyzes the consistency of the project with the Comprehensive Plan, the development standards of the I-2 zone, and the criteria for approving a change of conditions. Such analysis is hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as findings of fact herein. 29. Neighboring property owners or the commenting public agencies did not express any opposition toward the project. 30. The adjoining property to the south has been attractively developed with office/warehouse uses. The office/warehouse use proposed for the site is of lower profile, and the site sits eight (8) feet below Woodruff Road to the west. 31. At the public hearing, the applicant requested that the Examiner not require the extension of the sight-obscuring fence along the west property line of the site. The Examiner rejects such HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 4 request, because the application proceeded to hearing with the understanding that such fencing would be extended. The existing buffering along the west property line, with the addition of the sight-obscuring fence, adequately buffers the neighboring residences to the west from the industrial/warehouse uses developed on the site. 32. The I-2 zone permits development of all uses permitted in the Regional Business (B-3) zone, provided the development standards of the B-3 zone are met. The B-3 zone requires frontage along a public road of the Principal Arterial classification or higher. Since the site is located along Local Access roads, B-3 zone uses not otherwise permitted in the I-2 zone cannot be developed on the site. County Planning conditions of approval for the proposal prohibit the development of B-3 zone uses on the site. 33. Changed conditions in the area since the site was last zoned include the addition of improvements to the site, inclusion of the site in the County's IUGA boundaries, the development of light industrial and commercial uses in the vicinity of the site, the change of conditions approved in File No. ZE-222A-79, the adoption of a the GMA Comprehensive Plan and Phase I Development Regulations, and increased population growth and traffic in the area. 34. The proposal, as conditioned, will not have a significant impact on the environment or adversely impact neighboring properties. 35. The updated conditions of approval for the project recommended by County Engineering, Spokane Regional Health District and County Utilities replace the conditions of approval for such agencies attached to the 1980 rezone of the site. Other conditions of approval of the 1980 rezone are also made applicable. Based on the above findings of fact, the Hearing Examiner enters the following: II. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The proposed change of conditions, as conditioned, generally conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. 2. The applicant has established that the proposal bears a substantial relationship to, and/or will not be detrimental to, the public health, safety or welfare. 3. Conditions in the area have significantly changed since the site was rezoned to the Restricted Industrial zone in 1980, and since the zoning of the site was reclassified to the I-2 zone on January 1, 1991. 4. The procedural requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act and the County's Local Environmental Ordinance have been met. 5. The proposal, as conditioned, complies with the I-2 zone, the County Zoning Code, and other applicable development regulations. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 5 1 6. The proposed change of conditions meets the criteria established in Section 14.504.040 of the County Zoning Code for a change of conditions application. 7. Approval of the land use application is appropriate under the criteria established for the approval of land use applications in Section 1 l of the County Hearing Examiner Ordinance, adopted by County Resolution No. 96-0171. III. DECISION Based on the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law above, the above application for a change of conditions application is hereby approved, subject to the conditions of the various public agencies specified below. Any changes to pubic agency conditions added or significantly altered by the Examiner are italicized. Failure to comply with the conditions of this approval may result in revocation of this approval by the Hearing Examiner. This approval does not waive the applicant's obligation to comply with all other requirements of other agencies with jurisdiction over land development. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF PLANNING 1. All conditions imposed by the Hearing Examiner shall be binding on the "Applicant", which term shall include the owners, developers and users of the property, and their heirs, assigns and successors. 2. This decision applies to the real property legally described as that portion of the north half of Tract 266 of Opportunity, according to the plat recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, page 20, records of Spokane County Auditor, lying south of Knox Avenue and east of Woodruff Road, excluding the South 54 feet of the north half of said Tract 266. 3. The proposal shall comply with the Light Industrial (1-2), the Aquifer Sensitive Overlay zone, and all other applicable provisions of the Spokane County Zoning Code, as amended. 4. The proposal shall comply with the Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance, as amended. 5. The applicant shall develop the subject property in conformance with the site plan of record dated May 25, 2001 in Planning File No. ZE-222B-79, subject to compliance with conditions of approval and development regulations. Minor variations may be approved administratively by the Director of the Division of Planning/designee pursuant to Section 14.504.040 of the County Zoning Code, as amended, subject to compliance with regulation standards and conditions of approval. 6. Approval is required by the Director of the Division of Current Planning/designee of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 6 7. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 8. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance, acceptable to the Director of the Division of Planning/designee, shall be submitted along with a performance bond or other suitable guarantee prior to release of building permits. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained so that sight distance at access points is not obscured or impaired. 9. A six (6)-foot high sight-obscuring fence shall be constructed on the eastern edge of the Type I landscaping strip required along Woodruff Road. 10. Uses identified in the Business Zones Matrix (Zoning Code Chapter 14.623) as permitted within the Regional Business (B-3) zone are not permitted on the subject site, as provided in Section 14.629.080 of the Zoning Code. 11. The Division of Current Planning shall file with the Spokane County Auditor, within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal from the final disposition, including lapsing of appeal period, a Title Notice, which shall generally provide as follows: "Prior to the issuance of any building permit for any building or any use on the property described herein, the applicant shall be responsible for complying with the provisions of the Zoning Code for Spokane County, Section 14.706 (Aquifer Sensitive Area Overlay Zone). The property which is the subject of this notice is more particularly described as follows: [legal description]" 12. All conditions of approval imposed on the site under the 1980 rezone of the site in File No. ZE-222-79 are replaced by the conditions of approval of this decision. 13. Uses permitted in the Regional Business (B-3) zone, as identified in the Business Zones Matrix (Zoning Code Chapter 14.623), are prohibited on the site unless such uses are otherwise permitted in the Light Industrial (I-2) zone, as amended. See Section 14.629.080 of the County Zoning Code. 14. The Division of Planning shall prepare and record with the Spokane County Auditor a Title Notice, noting that the property in question is subject to a variety of special conditions imposed as a result of approval of a land use action. This Title Notice shall serve as public notice of the conditions of approval affecting the property in question. The Title Notice should be recorded within the same time frame as allowed for an appeal and shall only be released, in full or in part, by the Division of Current Planning. The Title Notice shall generally provide as follows: "The parcel of property legally described as that portion of the north half of Tract 266 of Opportunity, according to the plat recorded in Volume "K" of Plats, page 20, records of Spokane County Auditor, lying south of Knox Avenue and east of Woodruff Road, excluding the South 54 feet of the north half of said Tract 266, is the subject of the approval of a land use action by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner on May 30, 2002, approving a change of conditions to the 1980 rezone of such property and imposing a variety of special development conditions. File HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 7 4 No. ZE-222B-79, which pertains to such approval, is available for inspection and copying in the Spokane County Division of Planning." SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF ENGINEERING Prior to release of a building permit, grading permit, or use of the property as proposed: 1. The applicant shall dedicate the applicable radius on Knox Avenue and Woodruff Road. 2. Access permits for approaches to the County Road System shall be obtained from the County Engineer. 3. A professional engineer (P.E.), licensed in the state of Washington, shall submit road and storm drainage construction plans and a drainage report that conform to the versions of the Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction, the Guidelines for Stormwater Management, and all applicable federal, state and local regulations and laws that are in effect at the time of the plan submittal or at the time of the development permit application(s). The final road and storm drainage plans and drainage report shall receive the County Engineer's acceptance prior to release of any grading, building, or right of way permit. 4. The applicant shall submit for approval by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District a detailed combined on-site sewage system plan and surface water disposal plan for the entire project or portion thereof if the development is phased. 5. A parking plan and traffic circulation plan shall be submitted and approved by the Spokane County Engineer. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard engineering practices. Paving or surfacing as approved by the County Engineer will be required for any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles. 6. To construct the roadway improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, join in and be willing to participate in any petition or resolution which purpose is the formation of a Road Improvement District (RID) for said improvement pursuant to RCW 36.88, as amended. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Woodruff Road. 7. As an alternative method of constructing the road improvements stated herein, the applicant may, with the approval of the County Engineer, accomplish the road improvements stated herein by joining and participating in a county Road project (CRP) to the extent of the required improvement. Spokane County will not participate in the cost of these improvements. This provision is applicable to Woodruff Road. 8. The construction of the roadway improvements stated herein shall be accomplished as approved by the Spokane County Engineer. 9. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway Section for the improvement of Knox Avenue that is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of varying amounts of asphalt to equal 20 feet of asphalt measured from the centerline, along the HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 8 frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. Note: The applicant has constructed road improvements from the intersection of Woodruff Road to the eastern access driveway off Knox Avenue. The applicant shall match these improvements along the Knox Avenue frontage. 10. The County Engineer has designated a Local Access Roadway section for the improvement of Woodruff Road that is adjacent to the proposed development. This will require the addition of varying amounts of asphalt to equal 20 feet of asphalt measured from the centerline, along the frontage of the development. Curbing and sidewalk must also be constructed. 11. All required improvements shall conform to the current State of Washington Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge construction and other applicable County standards and/or adopted resolutions pertaining to Road Standards and Stormwater Management in effect at the date of construction, unless otherwise approved by the County Engineer. 12. Access to Woodruff Road shall be prohibited until such time as specifically authorized by the Spokane County Engineer. Note: Any access to Woodruff Road will require the applicant to construct full frontage improvements. 13. Roadway standards, typical roadway sections and drainage plan requirements are found in Spokane County Resolution No. 1-0298 as amended and are applicable to this proposal. 14. No construction work is to be performed within the existing or proposed right of way until the County Engineer has issued a permit. All work within the public road right of way is subject to inspection and approval by the County Engineer. 15. All required construction within the existing or proposed public right of way is to be completed prior to the release of a building permit or a bond in an amount estimated by the County Engineer to cover the cost of construction or improvements shall be filed with the County Engineer. 16. Applicant shall sign "Spokane County Notice to the Public Number 6" which specifies the following: "The owner(s) or successor(s) in interest agree that in consideration of Mutual Benefits now or to be hereafter derived, do for themselves, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) in interest hereby request and authorize Spokane County to include the above described property in a Road Improvement District (RID) and to support the formation of a Road Improvement District for improvement of the road(s) described below, by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to place their name(s) on a petition for the formation of a Road Improvement District pursuant to RCW 36.88.050, or by requesting and authorizing Spokane County to cast their ballot in favor of a RID being formed under the resolution method pursuant to RCW 36.88.030, and/or by not filing a protest against the formation of a RID being formed under the alternative resolution method provided for in RCW 36.88.065 and Chapter 35.43 RCW. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 9 L If an RID is proposed for improvement of the road(s) described below, said owner(s) and successor(s) further agree: (1) that the improvements or construction contemplated within the proposed RID are feasible and (2) that the benefits to be derived from the formation of the RID by the property included therein, together with the amount of any County participation, exceeds the cost and expense of formation of the RID, and (3) that the property within the proposed RID is sufficiently developed; provided, they, their heirs, grantees, assigns and successor(s) shall retain the right, as authorized under RCW 36.88.090, to object to any assessment(s) on the property as a result of the improvements called for in conjunction with the formation of a RID by either the petition or resolution method under Chapter 36.88 RCW and to appeal to the Superior Court the decision of the Board of County Commissioners confirming the final assessment roll; provided further, it is recognized that actual assessments may vary from assessment estimate so long as they do not exceed a figure equal to the increased true and fair value improvement(s) add(s) to the property. It is further acknowledged and agreed that at such time as a RID is created or any County Road Improvement project is authorized by Spokane County, the improvements required shall be at the sole expense of the owner(s) of property within the RID or served by the improvements without any monetary participation by Spokane County." The RID waiver contained in this agreement shall expire after ten (10) years from the date of execution below. This provision is applicable to Woodruff Road. 17. The applicant is advised that there may exist utilities either underground or overhead affecting the applicant's property, including property to be dedicated or set aside future acquisition. Spokane County will assume no financial obligation for adjustments or relocation regarding these utilities. The applicant should contact the applicable utilities regarding responsibility for adjustment or relocation costs and to make arrangements for any necessary work. 18. The applicant shall grant applicable border easements adjacent to Spokane County Right of Way per Spokane County Standards. SPOKANE COUNTY DIVISION OF UTILITIES 1. A wet (live) sewer connection to the area-wide Public Sewer System shall be constructed. A sewer connection permit is required. Commercial developments shall submit historical and/or estimated water usage prior to the issuance of the connection permit in order to establish sewer fees. 2. The applicant shall submit expressly to Spokane County Division of Utilities, "under separate cover", only those plan sheets showing sewer plans and specifications for the public sewer connections and facilities for review and approval. Commercial developments shall submit historical and/or estimated water usage as part of the sewer plan submittal. 3. Sewer plans acceptable to the Division of Utilities shall be submitted prior to the issuance of the sewer construction permit. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 10 4. Arrangements for payment of applicable sewer charges must be made prior to issuance of sewer connection permit. Sewer charges may include special connection charges and general facilities charges. Charges may be substantial depending upon the nature of the development. 5. Any water service for this project shall be provided in accordance with the Coordinated Water System plan for Spokane County, as amended. SPOKANE REGIONAL HEALTH DISTRICT 1. The sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 3. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply when approved by the Regional Engineer (Spokane), State Department of Health. 4. Subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health District, the use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 5. The use of private wells and water systems is prohibited. 6. The structures with water pressure must be connected to public water and public sewer. SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT NO. 1 1. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall be required for this project. A water plan is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development. SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 1. All air pollution control regulations shall be met. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 11 DATED this 30' day May, 2002 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER _;~71,ZC4 0 ~ Michael C. Dempsey, WSBA #k35 NOTICE OF FINAL DECISION AND NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No. 96-0171, the decision of the Hearing Examiner on an application for a change of conditions is final and conclusive unless within twenty-one (21) calendar days from the issuance of the Examiner's decision, a party with standing files a land use petition in superior court pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW. Pursuant to chapter 36.70C RCW, the date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is three (3) days after it is mailed. This Decision was mailed by Certified Mail to the Applicant, and by first class mail to other parties of record, on May 30, 2002. The date of issuance of the Hearing Examiner's decision is therefore June 3, 2002, counting to the next business day when the last day for mailing falls on a weekend or holiday. THE LAST DAY FOR APPEAL OF THIS DECISION TO SUPERIOR COURT BY LAND USE PETITION IS JUNE 24, 2002. The complete record in this matter, including this decision, is on file during the appeal period with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, Third Floor, Public Works Building, 1026 West Broadway Avenue, Spokane, Washington, 99260-0245, (509) 477-7490. The file may be inspected Monday - Friday of each week, except holidays, between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. Copies of the documents in the record will be made available at the cost set by Spokane County. Pursuant to RCW 36.70B.130, affected property owners may request a change in valuation for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program of revaluation. HE Findings, Conclusions and Decision ZE-222B-79 Page 12 Adlift' h 7 i !Yr r and ti•',a}~la~ , VIII - y oil County File # ZE-222-79 Sec. 8 R'ge 44 T'sh'P 2 5 - NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE DID ON APRIL 11, 1980 TAKE THE ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRO- VISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW. (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED ON 6 / 27 / 80 00 days from date of 2nd news- paper publication) OR BE BARRED. THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE NOTICE OF WHICH IS HEREBY GIVEN, WAS AS FOLLOWS: (1) APPROVED ACTION: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION REQUEST COUNTY FILE ZN-222-79 (2) DESCRIPTION: AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL FOR THE PURPOSE OF DEVELOPING SALES, SERVICE, ENGINEERING REPAIR OFFICES FOR CUMMINS NORTHWEST DIESEL. (3) SUCH ACTION PERTAINED TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS AND/OR DESCRIBED AS (street address per general location) : SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WOODRUFF ROAD AND KNOX AVENUE. SECTION 8-25-44. (4) PERTINENT DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING NORMAL COUNTY BUSINESS HOURS AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, 99260 PHONE: (509) 456-2205 NOTICE GIVEN BY: DIVERSIFIED PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS FILED BY: NAME: GINGER JOHN N TIT OFFICE MANAGER SIGNATURE Revised 12/1/79 County File ZN-222-79 Sec. 8 R 8C 44 T'ship 25 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S.S. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) JERRY LITT being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. _rk J That on the 01 day of c ,u,~ , 19 80 , I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspi- cuous manner on the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which is the subject of the ACTION, to wit, the following locations: 4n F;2 2. 3. S O ~c l[J r' ts~e C~ 4. ✓D~ P r 7kcr T`c.c . g ~i~~0 X DATED this L'?-day of 19 80 is y of SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me t da 19 80 . (~otaryy//4)ublic i nd for the State of Wash' ton, residing at Spokane Rev: 4/17/79 " rte s, ~o"c,~ /1 Gc~mc~0 d►z, Ale- OFFICE of THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date MARC8 /3 ,198A To ENCa1Nc1E-~~K~ r TN DELE, EIRE MARSHA U.1 Zoa STAF-IWJ OTIL-1 715 S From _ .ZQNh L6 _ . _ Subject ='t~M 2-9 -Z2_7L-79 Cwj-ri l 6E.Z ratim MR rN gBAIAINS., To A++acheci s +he- revised 5i+t, P1wn -P' " ,ZF - Z Z 2- 79. r-P yoo hav e. any ComrncA+S pleaS~ -rorward *em +0 -ate- ' Zon,n~ L7t by MQrr,k Z•i, 5 9D . Than k Yo 0. STAFF REPORT DATE: April 10, 1980 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-222-79 (Continued from March 6, 1980) I. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Diversified Planning and Development Consultants STATUS OF APPLICANT: Agent PROPERTY OWNER: Larry Sinclair EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: Restricted Industrial PROPOSED USE: Sales, service, engineering, repair offices for Cummins Northwest Diesel PROJECT LOCATION: The site is located at the so.utheast corner of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 7.5 Acres. SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site gently slopes downwards towards the northeast with a greater slope downwards towards the northwest at the intersection of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue. NEJGHBORHOD CHARACTER: The area north of the site is in a transition from undeveloped land to industrial uses. The remaining area has retained a single family rural atmosphere, excluding the below grade freeway to the south. LAND USE: Site Duplex, dog kennels, grazing North Business park, business park under construction East Single family, pasture West Single family, undeveloped South Interstate 90, single family ZONING: North Restricted Industrial, established 1974 East Agricultural, established 1955 West Agricultural Suburban, established 1955 South Agricultural Suburban, established 1953 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Neighborhood/Industrial (contd.) h ZONE RECLASSI FICATI( NUMBER ZE-222-79 11 SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Residential Neighborhood/ Industrial NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS 3 NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED 1 Total Square Feet Approximately 39,600 sq ft Percent of Coverage 12 1% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES 1 PARKING REQUIRED Wholesale/heavy machinery 40 spaces PROVIDED Auto - 115, Tractor - 31, Trailer - 8, Total - 154 III BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In recent years, areas to the north of this site have been rezoned to Res- tricted Industrial Consideration should be given to landscaping of the west sides of the site due to the residential neighborhood located on Woodruff Road The site plan also indicates that the east 245 feet will not be developed at this time The applicant will be requied to submit a development plan for the area to the Hearing Examiner Committee prior to issuance of building permits The Spokane County Health District has commented that this project lies over the Spokane Aquifer, is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and service area of Modern Electric Company Soils are suitable for use of on-site sewage disposal systems It lies within the 208 study recommended Primary Sanitary Sewer Area Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces may be prohibited IV AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall be required for this project A water plan is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development ZONE RECLASSIFICATION' JMBER ZE-222-79 b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1 Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Woodruff Road and a 20 foot radius on Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue for right-of-way 2 Applicant must work with adjacent property owners to the west o construct a lo 1 d t the south end of Woodruff Road 3 pp scant shall nstruct cement ncrete curb and pave to b existing pavement on Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue 4 An appropriate off-site drainage disposal system and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project 5 A detailed combined on-site sewage system and surface water disposal plan for the entire project shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit 6 The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles shall be maintained in hard surface paving c) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 A combined sewage and surface water disposal plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and Spokane County Health District prior to issuance of any building permits 2 Water service shall be from Modern Electric Company only 3 Sanitary plumbing shall be installed to facilitate connection to an area-wide sewerage system 4 The owner, his heirs and assigns shall agree to participate in and not protest assessments for any local improvement district for sewering to serve this property 5 Connection to area-wide sewer collection system shall be made when the system becomes available 4e I t File No ZE-222-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on April 11, 1980, (continued from March 6 1980) , A)ffi& and tie members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Acting Chairman, and Ted McCourv 6 PROPOSAL The sponsor, Diversified Plan & Dev Cons is requesting approval of a shanSoxob xxxA)NyxW zone reclassification, File No ZE-222-79 9 Agricultural to Restricted Industrial , for the purpose of developing sales, service, engineerinc repair offices for Cummins Northwest Diesel C FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the existing land use in the area is residential, dog kennels, business park, nters,tate 90, and undeveloped il2 hat t e Comprehensive Pla ethis area as appropriate for residential/industrial development 3 That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural 4 That the provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda item have been fulfilled 6 That the land in this area is sui tabl e/xm~ jm6ejxj& for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification 7 That the applicant has/jawgnt demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed rezone i s/xxx;icm x 3 usti f i ed r File No ZE-222-79 8 That the proposed use is compatible/iwa gi%M with existing uses in the area 9 That the owners of adjacent lands expressed yaxk ayt/approval/disapproval/ both of the proposed use 10 Th-e Hearing Examiner Committee finds/dMxR%kxJkVA the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare 11 The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee - The Hearing Examiner Committee personally visited the site D CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL (List here all conditions noted in Staff Analysis) 1 All Conditions listed in Staff Report 2 That no future access be allowed to Woodruff Road 3 That a berm 130 feet west of the building, 10 feet high, with 6-foot plantings on top of it be installed before the building is completed 4 That a fence be constructed at the southwest edge of the building, 6 feet high, so that it will block the lightsof the cars going into the parking area, being extended from the southwest corner of the building to the berm for protection of the properties on the other side of the Freeway 5 That the County Engineer's Office recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that traffic signs be placed at the following intersections which will prohibit truck traffic On Shannon, off Woodruff, Locust at Montgomery, and Knox and Woodruff 6 Delete Conditions 2 and 3 from the County Engineer's Office requirements 7 That future development on the West 245 feet of the property between Knox Avenue and the Freeway by any future building will be for an office business park 2 File No ZE-222-79 E ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Diversified Planning & Development Consultants for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be approved Motion by McCoury Seconded by Myers Vote 2 - 0 Approved HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairman ATTEST JAMES L. MANSON Acting Planning Director By 3-/+-90 3 • ZONE RECLH3Z)IFICATION NO ZE-222-79 II SITE PLAN INFORMATION (contd ) NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS 3 NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED 1 Total Square Feet Approximately 43,681 sq ft Percent of Coverage 13% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES 1 PARKING REQUIRED Wholesale/heavy machinery 44 Spaces PROVIDED Auto -75, Tractor - 539 Trailer - 9, Total - 137 III BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This item was continued from the March 6, 1980, Hearing Examiner Committee meeting to allow the applicant to revise the site plan incorporating the following items a) Orientation of the development to Knox Avenue with access to Woodruff Road eliminated b) Covering the building elevation and screening the development to provide visual protection for residential areas to the west of the project site A revised site plan submitted by the applicant indicates that the development has been shifted east, leaving the west part of the site undeveloped Hearing Examiner Committee concerns, as expressed on March 6, 1980, have been incorporated into the revised site plan The Spokane County Health District has commented that this project lies over the Spokane Aquifer, is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and service area of Modern Electric Company Soils are suitable for use of on- site sewage disposal systems It lies within the "208" Study recommended Primary Sanitary Sewer Area Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces may be prohibited IV AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall be required for this project A water plan is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development 2 (contd ) ZONE RECI J FICATION NO ZE-222-79 IV AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS (contd ) b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1 Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Woodruff Road and a 20 foot radius on Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue for right of way 2 Applicant must work with adjacent property owners to the west to construct a cul de sac at the south end of Woodruff Road, lying north of Interstate 90 3 Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and pave to existing pavement on Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue 4 An appropriate off-site drainage disposal system and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project 5 A detailed combined on-site sewage system and surface water disposal plan for the entire project shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit 6 The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles shall be maintained in hard surface paving c) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company, and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 A combined sewage and surface water disposal plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and Spokane County Health District prior to issuance of any building permits 2 Water service shall be from Modern Electric Company only 3 Sanitary plumbing shall be installed to facilitate connection to an area-wide sewerage system 4 The owner, his heirs and assigns shall agree to participate in and not protest assessments for any local improvement district for sewering to serve this property 5 Connection to area-wide sewer collection system shall be made when the system becomes available 6 The use of on-site sewage systems may be authorized until service from a central sewage system is available 3 (contd ) M ZONE REC 31FICATION NO ZE-222-79 e) SEPA 1 That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43 21C 080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made 2 The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee f) ZONING I Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits 2 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits 3 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained 4 Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary 5 The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the west 245 feet of the rezoned area -4- POKAIM COMP Ifnt rN DISTRICT Inter-Offlce COcation Date March 21, 1980 TO Zoninst Rearina C ttee Spokane County FROM. Euse_ ne C_, ra r. R.S. s SUBJECT ZE-222-79 (Diversified Planning and Development Co.) 1. Findings This project lies over the Spokane Aquifer, Within Critical Water Supply Service Area No. 3, and within the water service area of the Modern Electric Company. It is within the Primary Sanitary Sever Area recommedded in the 11208" study Topography and soils in this area are generally suitable for use of on-site sewage systems. 2 Recoamiendations • as Water service shall be only from the Modern Electric Company. b. The use of on-site sewage systems may be authorized until service from a central sewerage system is avail- able. c The owner, his heirs, and successors shall agree to not protest legal assessments and utility local im- provement districts to provide central sewerage service to this lot. d. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot. dlp c• Diversified Planning and Development Company E 9822 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 SCHD-ADI+-118 AGENDA, APRIL 10, 1980 1tLtPHONE NO 456 - 2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 1 30 p M (CONTINUATION OF AFTERNOON SESSION) B ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 13 ZN- 4-80 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Continued from February 7, 1980) (Approximately 400 feet northwest of the northwest corner of Hawthorne Road and the Newport Highway Section 17-26-43) Proposed Use 28-unit Apartment Complex Applicant NACCARATO 0 3 Acres) 14 ZE-222-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Postponed from March 6, 1980) (Southeast corner of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue Section 8-25-44) Proposed Use Sales/Service/Engineering/Repair Offices Applicant DIVERSIFIED PLANNING & DEV (7 5 Acres) 5 00 P M - - - - - ADJOURNMENT A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-20-330(2) provides that " In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E I S shall be prepared " -3- POKANE CbWTY REALM DISTRICT .inter-Office ComM=cat3on Date February 11, 1980 TO: a Count Planning Department FROM R1111stfim C_ 29L R.S. SUBJECT Matt-era fer Rearm March 6. 1980 , ZE-222-79 (Cummins N.W Diesel) a Findings 9 ~Ott( is project lies over the Spo a Aquifer, is within Critical Water Supply 3 7208 rvice Area No 3 and servic area of Modern Electric Company Soils are ~~StS itable for use of on-site ewage disposal systems It lies within the Study recommended Pr ry Sanitary Sewer Area. Disposal of sewage ef- uent beneath paved su aces may be prohibited b Recommendations 1) A combined sewage and surface water disp sal plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and Spo ne County Health District prior to issuance of any building pe is o`~lp~JS 2) Water service shall be from Modern lectric Company only 3) Sanitary plumbing shall be instal ed to facilitate connection to an area-wide sewerage system. 4) The owner, his heirs and assign shall agree to participate in and ,r not protest assessments for any local improvement district for sev- ering to serve this property. 5) Connection to area-wide sever ollection system shall be made when the system becomes available E VE FEB 1 ~ , 98p pLAN OkANE CO NIMS pEPgRNTr T MENT SCxD-ADM-its "TA 7,c• STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY WASHINGTON Olympia, Washington 98504 206/753-2800 fl Dixy Lee Ray Governor TO: FROM: The Washington State Department of Ecology headquarters office (Olympia) has received and recorded the following "Notice of Action Taken" pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. This notice is now on file and available for review upon request. Acting agency: Type of action taken: Project: - 1 A'(1-by 't Lea ZULOMITIZA-z / VW Date received: _5 a DOE f i l e number: NAT- 0 00- S This letter indicates only filing of the notice of action with the Department of Ecology. It does not indicate concurrence with the format or contents of the notice, or compliance with all provisions of RCW 43.21C.080. If you have any questions, please contact the Environmental Review Section, (206) 753-6892. ECY 010-4-50 Rev. 6/78 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON. flu, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, ......---~Oh11.. being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the EdiOJT...................................... Notice of Action by "M Spokane County of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekly newspaper. That said news- HearingExaminfrCommittee paper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to. published 43.21C RCW, notice is hereby yrven t the Spokane County Hearing Examiner in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County. Committee did onApril 11,1980,takethe Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office action described below. Anyy action to set aside, en(oin, review maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which or otherwise challenge such action on said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper b order of the Su- the grounds of non-compliance with the perior Court of the State of Washington in and for Spokane County. That the prov ~siorn of Chapter 43.71C RCWi5tafe Environmental Policy Act) shall be, commenced on June 77, 1980, or be barred. The action taken by the Spokane annexed is a true copy of a xat eaa.-_Qf-_- Q_ I.Q.11 _ County Hearing Examiner committee, notice of which is herehy given, was as fol lows : (1) Approved Action: Zone reclassifi- cation request. County File No. ZN-712 as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form), of said 79. (7) Description: Agricultural to restricted industrial for the purpose of developK►g sales, service, engineering newspaper once each week for a period of............ V_M ............................consecutive repair offices for Cummins Northwest Diesel. (3) Such action pertained to property commonly known as and-or described weeks, commencing on the......? 1.8 t...day of...__._..._ ly._......... 19 as: Southeast corner of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue. Section 8-25-44. (4) Pertinent documents may be ~~QQ~~.. Ma 19.80 examined during normal county busi and endin on th&.......[,t11.l b,_ . dsy of_.......... ? ness hours at the Spokane County Plan g ning Department, N. 721 Jefferson both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to Street, Spokane, Washington 99260. . Phone (509) 456 7M its subscribers 2daw of sal od. Notice given by: Diversified Planning it. Development Consultants. Filedby: Ginger Johnson, pfficeMan- 5-21-5.28 Subser ore me this ~$t$..._... dr y 1s0 01 . . . . May . i> N r., Public in and for the State ~of ashington, Residing at: Spokane, WA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON, w COUNTY OF SPOKANE, f r..........................., being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekly newspaper. That said news- Notice of Action by the f7aper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six Hearing E amineruCo~mmittee months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to, published Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County. 43.21c SRCW, pokane notice is hereby Examam~ner that the Spokane County Hearing Ez Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office Committee did on April 11, IM, take the maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which action described below. Any action to set aside, enjoin. review said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Su- or otherwise Challenge such action on the grounds of non-compliance with the F ,erior Court of the State of Washington in and for Spokane County. That the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (State Environmental Policy Act) shalt be, commenced on June 27, 1980, or be f7LiL ..i 1" Luull....... _ barred. annexed is a true copy of a .........i iL The action taken by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. notice of which is hereby given, was as follows: . (1) Approved Action: Zone reclassifi- ac it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form), of said cation request. County File No. ZN•222- 79. (2) Description: Agricultural to COnBeCUt1Ve restricted Industrial for the purpose of newspaper once each week for a period of tMM developing sales, service, engineering repair offices for Cummins Northwest Diesel. 19-: (3) Such action pertained to property weeks, commencing on the-_,2191-day of.......... _ commonly known as and-or described as: Southeast corner of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue. Section 8.25.44. ~ii~~~~RR,, ,t: I8 . , (4) Pertinent documents may be and an(linst on the...... ~,fa UI.....day of........... 1 X _ . examined during normal county busi- both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to ness hours at the Spokane County Plan- ning Department, N. 721 Jefferson its subscribers during said od. Street, Spokane, Washington 99260. Phone (S09) 456.2205. Notice given by: Diversified Planning & Development Consultants. - - Filedby: Ginger Johnson, Office Man- ager 5.21-5.28 8nbscri an worn to before ~~-m~~-e~ this ...................t ~ .._.~........._......day o:.... )ls^f t. ub 1c in and for the State of ^ Uq'shington, Residing at: Spokane, 'WA ` PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET M ~ r~ c i y sl6 4fv.[F.A.. PHONE 456-2205 3E, I SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 5pp.A.4 C COI;riTY COURT N01-1 5E File # ZE-222-79 Section 8 Township 25 Range 44 Classification: Agricultural to Restricted Industrial Application Title: Cummins Northwest Diesel T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N ✓PROPOSED ✓1VON-SIGNIFICANCE DECLARATION OF FINAL SIGNIFICANCE 1. Description of Proposal: Develop a portion of 7.5 acres into a sales/servicing/ engineering and engine repair complex. Building is to be 22,400 sq. ft. with adding future building of 7,200 sq. ft.; 12% coverage; 115 car spaces (3 acres has been indicated as property to be developed at this time.) 2. Proponent: Diversified Planning & Development Consultants 3. Contact Person: Kenneth E. Kirsch Phone: 922-4355 4. County Action Requested: Zone Reclassification 5. Location of Proposal: The site is located at the southeast corner of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue; just north if Interstate-90. 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environ- mental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name: JamYingg Man n Name: Chairman Signature: - '~K~ !fit" Signature: Title: Plan Director Title: Chai an Dept: Spokane County Planning Department Dept: Hearing Examiner Committee Date: February 20, 1980 Date: APf?)L 1980 Revised "12/1/79 oip 04 Qorx~y~ ;lo ..~v.aa.7`tia~e y oa~~te.:~rLo~d~ aY~~i~rrez, J 10 "Ok: /C ' a C ..~i ~-<•~-~.Lf ~ ~ fug.-t.~-- ~ ~1-~-- c~ t# - :~'-tq~-~=~~:.~L~.crc,.~~ tl J Le' f y~ 74- 3; w- ~ / • L~1 ~ L.s "mot/ j-f. - 5POI~ANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTPIENT SL~iPIl/LPi &bt611 7"w- Ti2d~611/ 0tJG: G/g EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 .a4 le March 11, 1980 Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator North 721 Jefferson St. Spokane, Washington Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone reclassifications have been reviewed for fire protection: ZE-3U-80 Redlin ZE-25-80 Curran/Delay 1 3 41 ZE-24-80 Carroll ~F yy ZE-21-80 Vi ue ZE-205-79 Gmeiner iJF'C~n~~ ZE-16-8U Pearson/Boyd/Littler ZE-14-80 Leland/Marks PUDE-1-80 McCurdy *"'3'' ZE- 2'22- 79 Diversified Planning & Dev. ~ . The above need mains and hydrants to be installed in the areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. Sincerely j - 1 t Al Cook Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn PREVENT FIRES SA VE LIVES ile No. ZE-222-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on March 6, 1980, and the members of the Committee present being Jane Myers, Acting Chairman, Ted McCoury and Paul Sceva, Jr. and having personally visited the site. B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Diversified Planning & Development Consultants, is requesting approval of a zone reclassification, ZE-222-79, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial, for the purpose of developing sales, service, engineering and repair offices . C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, business park, and 1-90. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential/industrial development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That a revised development plan shall reflect a lower elevation of the site to accommodate sufficient screening, along with landscaping to provide protection to the residential properties located in the west side of the proposal. b) That truck traffic be limited to access only on Knox Avenue and pro- hibited on Woodruff Road. D. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Diversified Planning & Development Consultants for a zone reclass- ification as described in the application should be postponed and returned to the sponsor for redesign of the proposal and scheduled for a new hearing at the April hearing of the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. 1 ile No. ZE-222-79 Motion by: McCou ry Seconded by: Sceva, Jr. Vote: Postponed 2-1 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairman ATTEST: JAMES L. MANSON Acting Planning Director By: -z J AI%kNI:Y Mky1•t►1~lyk t•'UK~1 174- ~jc~ ~7 l)/ it utm.- New.:: a J- tltl+c: "NNW IMF 1% Y.I~L't : • I-u-&J A~a:11~ y 1• t u j l t, UAVk kkVllWktj '1'I1k { c to r T-k' G CO kuv.cit I.trt Pru A • Yla.1i-1~t;. vE y10alE. of M~ Yl~l t ~S I S I S WAUkk QUAL1'I'Y A. _ - -Uuv I.:w t'ur ANNruvrj Meyy/rtra _ - - i. s.:l►t la: tdink W17* 500 v•!'.D. or so or _ _ 1 • Mv~ I~.an l c:t l ryYtt3t. air laNuoa W/3300 G. r p~ Mir rl it,nv . _ (:uww~:t-~Irl ur lt~durtrlrl t~cllit V air not" t►.:tvl~a::.. - _ - _ _ _4 . N1'I/kS Pu rm 1 t r uyu 1 s nd r • - __S. Stdtu Permit reyulcud _k. 1 . S P$ ul►..r.ft lute kwalucaL d t:.!- . .t:. Ml. ! . 1'I atl►dt ~1[ lyll Itr/ly.rrr~ U. ~ - -__k~~V 1 r~,1~w~111 ~ 1 l:l~t;•:k 1 I.rt Itrgyr+rtvtl - - y~t.:r ~lywl Ity StutWutvr llutll~tt~rtluw Ilryyltt+tl ~Alpl►1 Icasst '1'u be lint/t lad - 1:alwrwwal& list i - - - - - Nu ill, j..:.A 11A.41 '1'.► . . • . 1 • _ .-.Ibwt y 1 I WJ Caom ,.,:eit v At t.t.: l wd AIM tjUALI'1'1( (is& Cuma! lud ur .h,r1r.t11t:tJoin) A. _ _Ok►l1G•v 4►1 14►i►utrim4.1ml Kvyvlrud u • _ _b►11 6► 111b ilu s ,,1 t Kvyu l 4 wal 11vt.4 11 %sJ 1:4j►wwa:sit a At t v•: isud :;tAl.t b0Ukd:k (I-ANA 11.:. I tl~t.lt lu1t~ A. ._I6rvi4►:t WIt1ol1t Acluilvr (I uchattAfm SM410 U.. ._UVA MuV lww Alipmartl Nut•urrSIry t.. r r.. i . " . - . . The department may have approval jurisdiction for the wastewater disposal facilities for this project. The department has concerns and would re- quire resolution of the following items: 1. The agency is opposed to the installation of a drainfield under a paved area and will not approve a facility with such a design. 2. The proponent must demonstrate adequate precautions have been in- cluded in the design to eliminate any discharge of petroleum pro- ducts to the ground surface. 3. The proponent should incorporate alternative facilities for runoff disposal then the use of dry wells. W.Laur.oL Aver:ue RE C E I V E n SpoKaa, wL.. ?9C06 COM-ITfi. North 721 Jeffers ~ f' U t1 n 1 i L ~lokane, ~Jasb. 99205 PLANNING DPPARTME_IN _ c.. ZE-222- G oL,Li ttee ;.eu t>er I are one of r~;ry ccc_cerr.cu ci.ti.~ r.5 ~i ~i c;~; ic. Li.c; aT C~ w:: cl: nfluenced by the aioove described zoning al:l lication, and which area is specifically located at the Southeast corner of Woodruff Road and Knox AvenL d extends South to the Freeway, and extenas so that it is contiguous to tr.. ~St ena of Shannon Avenue. I " not so very surprised at the owners of the land to be re-zr.ned, as tr. Lre being offerect a very handsome trice for their land, but I ag dissapointed the developers for choosing so illogical a sight, and I will certainly be amaze,- -t the coiruittee if it allows any more industry to "creep.up the hill" from hon ,-emery Avenue, and begin a degenerative process, which ultiuately rapFens in th_` ..ind of spotty zoning. I should hope the county will stop its favoritism: to LI.., folks w _i c.. u.re certainly more conducive to the derelopR:ent of industry. The only kir~.. cf things that should be permitted on the land in question are 6i ther the cf ~,,,_riculture or the development of subidivisions for private residencet- The effect of a light-industrial complex cc,nstructed on the sight it-_ i,rould D►cst certainly devaluate the worth of my home and other homes is this area. I was inforned c.f that fact by an appraiser just two days ago. Yy position is t" If such re-zoning is permitted than the developers and the sellers of the laud a: r,hically indebted to me and to the other concerned lrole4y owners to the extend ur value losses. Aral 11n u(idition to that I would request a reafpraisal by the CC. Acsessorts &_TiCe to reduce ray taxes, dua I would encourage others to Troceed i ..._~i c -anner, T;: allow the- establis~Bent cf an industrial zone in a neighborhood that i:, et<.~ri oratint; is somewhat understandable, but here where most of the homes are c-r 12 ears old, and where appraisals would run from about 50 to 75 thousand collars unthinkable and to l.ermit it would be destructive. The increased traff ice flow on cur street, which is without sidewalks, would stiller increase the haazards of foot travel, lrarticularly that of our childred go- Lo and from school at the sage hours that eul:loyeed would be uriving down our stye: on their way to work at the proposed sight. Not only the safety factor is involve- in this point, ibut the noise of amore automobiles and trucks is something a healthy r_i crhocd can well do without. Tc sure it all uF I wcula say that I just plain don' ' ic: uack yard. Houses, ye=s! Factories anu shots, nc! Sincerely lour. G' rt J. LhI;ra liullitii1 Zu1;1i:G G Last 9606 S*L-annon Avenue LLII-.IN&-. COMITTEE SFokane, Wa. i;ort h 721 Jefferson St. Karch g, 1~: zq.okane, Was hington 99205 lie: Zoning Reclassificatic: Nc. ZE-22 2 1 Wish ~L I'E;LL er r c.,esL u0 LLiC ~;UL-tird6 reCic1331YiCa~I::C. ~esCZi~E;c: allL I've seen a coFy of the tentative development submitted b; Cummins Diesel ar.(,. ucOt believe it lends itself to what is already established in the neighb-cr1`-cc,.'., I am also ccncerned with what effect this will cr. doui)t that it would be hell:ful in that respect. Another cor.cerr. is the increase in the trai'- ~ .Lc;. - 1 4 tic (ic::ens cl children. d1-. have no sidewalks, traffic sigh- _ 4-c safety features for the protection of the ckildren. Our streets are nct 1- roperly surfaced to carry the he<..; C)e travelling over ti-ea. I believe we, the homeowners, woul Ussesessed with tLe bill for the iu rove;tent to the streets. The nci se, ollutic,,. and smells from large diesel truck:,. u u nj leasant, and esl ecially for the homeowners giving closest to the development , I can see nothing th&t would I revert trucks with large trailers from park: j n front of ivy home when the Cummins lot becomes full. The danger factor, ss as the eyesore element are worthy reasons to reject ~ s ezoning al.plicatior: I dcnl t wish to i:q-eue I rogress, but this kir of a elokneat is dry T curs-- - r Cr les L. Boexf a ,g 57 , t I e Gfw v L r i" ,~~t. ✓L~ . 7L 2n~- L-C!-~-~~-t'CiCr/ ~V fir;.' ~ ~ _ Cam' top Z;! CY L~ ~1 LAP Gam!/ :.e G , I. . 1 ~1 t r r _ - i ~ _ - i .,i- i f 13 f4 FA CHARLES E. MCCOLL[M REAL ESTATE APPRAISER & CONSULTANT P.O. BOX 8242 MANITO STATION (509) MA 4-7557 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99203 March 5,1980 William Diller E. 9821 Shannon Ave. Spokane,Washington 99206 Dear Mr.Miller: At your request I have made an inspection and appraisal of the property you own at the abuvc address. The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the before and after value of the property if a large truck repair facility is allowed to be built,directly east of the subject. The improvements consist of a tri-level frame house built in 19559and containing some: 19100 sq. ft. The lower level has a living room,the furnace,and utility room.There is a fireplace in the living room.The mid level has the kitchen and a large family room,with fireplace.The upper level has the 3 bedrooms and 1J baths. The overall condition of the house is very good. The roof is split shake.There is a 1 car attached garage. The setting of the house allows for a view over the valley and the surronding hills. The general range of value in the area seems to run from a low of $359000 to a high of maybe $100,000. The lower value house is a rental but looked to be in good to fair shape the balance of the housesall appeared well maintained. In addition to the subject house you have a vacant lot directly north of the property, that before the advent of the commercial usage,would have sold for about $13,000. With the current commercial usage,it is my opinion that the value would be no more than $10,000 at this time. If the proposed new commercial enterprise is allowed to go in,it would in my opinion render the lot usless. It would not be a good lot for residential use:,and is toy small for commercial.So you would have a projected loss of $10,000 on the lot,. The house in my opinion has a value today of $75,000. And could be readily financ:c. After the new commercial with all the noise,truck traffic,lights ect. goes in I know I would surely take a long look at the property if I were called to make an appraisal for loan purposes,and if I had another outlet for the minty would reject the subject property as not being a good residential ri"-k. It is my opinion that the value of the prupurty wouio Jiminisheu Dy at lua~>t '425,000,and you would loose a great part of the market,because of the commercial usage going on right next to the property. So we have a oefore v e estimate for the entire pare of X85,000 and an after estimate of $50,000.So you would suffer a X359000 loss as the result of this "inverse condemnation. " Respectfu ly submitted 1 i (~V arles ~IcCollim CHARLES E. MCCOLUM REAL ESTATE APPRAISER & CONSULTANT 3506 BEN BURR BLVD. (509) K- E: -1 f; SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99209 LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. That the legal description is assumed to be correct. 2. No responsibility legal in character, nor is any opinion of title rendered herein. 3. The property is appraised as though free and clear as indicated. 4. The information given to me by the owner is assumed to be correct. 5. Testimony or attendance in court will not be required, by reason of the opinion, with reference to the pr(-)perty, unless arrangements have pre7.71 ou.~z1- made t?iereforc. % i ilereL)y cerLiiy tnaL i person,~Iiiy inspucced L Liu property dt=SUriE d and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements and opinions expressed in this report are correct and that I have no interest present or prospective therein; and that neither the employ- ment nor the right to make the estimate, nor the compensation i~ contingent upon the amount of the valuation reported. CHARLES E. MCCOLLIM REAL ESTATE APPRAISER a CONSULTANT P.O. BOX 8242 MANITO STATION ( 809 - MA a SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99203 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE APPRAISEF' EXPERIENCE:: Real Estate Salesman for R.D. Staeheli & Co. from Feb. 1952 to Oct. 1953. Real Estate Salesman for Hege Co. from Oct. 1953 to Sept. 1955. Vice-President of and appraiser for J.L. Cooper Co. from Sept. 1955 to Feb. 1967. Have made numerous appraisals for Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Western and Southern Life Insurance Co., Business Mens Assurance Co., Mortgage Associates, inc. Have completed fee assignments for City of Spokane, Fairway Finance Co., Pacific Northwest Bell, Dominican Sisters of Washington, Atlantic Richfield Co., Hometown Finance Co., Farmers and Merchants Bank of Rockford, Securities Intermountain Inc., Federal Housing Administration, Veterans Administration, Bankshares Mortgage Co., Spokane County Airport Board, Spokane Tribe of Indians, AVCO Financial Services, Lincoln First Federal Savings & Loan, Numerous Credit Unions, Numerous Attorneys, Individuals and Real Estate Companys in matters concerning farms, residential and commercial properties. Assistant-Secretary and Manager of the Mortgage Loan Department of Sherwood and Roberts - Spokane Inc. from Feb. 1967 to April 1969. Currently engaged as a fee appraiser. QUALIFICATIONS: Completed the course conducted by the Society of Real Estate Appraisers in Spokane, Washington, under the direction of George Swarthout in Nov. 1961, and passed the written examination. Completed Real Estate Course 1, conducted by the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, under the direction of Robert Fleshman, at Portland, Oregon, in Feb. 1962 and successfully passed the written examination. Passed the written examination given by the State of Washington Department of Highways, on Right of Way and Condemnation Appraising. Qualified as an expert witness in the Superior Court in the County of Spokane, and have testified in matters of condemnation, estate and other valuations. Qualified as an expert witness in the United States District Court in north Idaho, and have testified as such in matters of condemnation, estate and other valuations. Completed the course given by the Federal Housing Administration, and passed the written examination, and have been a fee appraiser for them since 1957. Passed the written examination by the Veterans Administration and am a fee appraiser for them. T0: The Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee We, the undersigned owners of homes adjacent to and in the vicinity of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue, wist to protest the property usage pro- posed by the requested zone change from agricultural to suburban-industrial of 7.5 acres (ZE-222-79). Please do not consider this petition, as opposed to our personEl appearance, as a sign of apathy or lesser interest. It is because tii timing of the hearing, on a work day, at an indefinite hour, makes it extremely d i f f i c u l t for most of us to attend. There are 40 homes (attachment A) most with a current evaluation of from 60 to 100 thousand dollars in this small but densely populated area. The bulk of these homes were individually built on lots purchased from the original two owners who, when they sub-divided, placed covenants on the deeds as to minimum construction value and usage that were intended to uphold property values. We were first isolated from the adjacent residential area to the south by the freeway and subsequently eroded by gradually encroachinc industrial and commercial zoning on the peri met,_r This final proposed change would complete the job, placing direc-I,; across from the east boundary of the area (an area that would certainly be zonE:d R-1 res i dent i a I anywhere m*mi in the va I ley or city) an i ndustri i op rati c.n that woLj I J be (>perEjt i ng s i xteen hours a day, that would be, under hi~ah-ir~t~:n~ity i I luriincjf-iun al I night lon(l, that would bring nci-De pol lution from the sarne source:, and that would invite heavy truck: traffic directly through the area, since Shannon Avenue is one of only two exits from the proposed faci I i t', A comparitive appraisal by a professional appraiser (attachment B), made on the home directly across Woodruff Road at 9821 East Shannon shows a projected appraised decline in value of $35,000.00. This home's bed- room windows would be less than 80 feet from the truck parking area, would be illuminated all night and flooded with diesel noise and exhaust. The appraiser also advises that the adjacent proposed usage would make it almost impossible for a purchaser to obtain a mortgage on this home, rlacinn the present owner in a position of being inversely condemned withoui comp- ensation, and unable to find a buyer. The additional proportional depre- ciated value of the balance of the area's homes would definitely be in the thousands of dollars. Even the more distant homes would be subject to the unsightly night illumination and heavy truck traffic. Some of us have lived here for over 25 years when the area was tru I agricultural. (attachment C3 We cannot and do not deny that Ii - trial and commercial zoning is inevitable adjacent to the rai (roam north. However, we strongly protest when it is allowed to directly adjoin our prior-existing borders with no buffer zoning or without even an attempt to limit its use to an operation with minimum irritant factors. We bought our homes in good faith, we have paid our full share of taxi, for years, we have paid for curbing and paving, we have raised and are still CS'~ raising sccres of children ►n what has been, up to now, a most enjoyable and attractive neighborhood environment. We cannot conceive that this should be f-! tie purp, Dsu- u(` l an i thi-1- cuu i J bt; ZOfitz;G with Tuf 1: S- !'~C?flt ~I V __;M, t:rSon infringement on the rights of so many kespectfui1 , i nnatu res At-i._: i Name '4t;;;A ..0' Address od - ' 1 712- • ~ ~ ~~~+~-~.-.~,r~,,.. ~ r ~ ~ _ , /174t g n2 r ~ ~f1 5 ~~t 1, V cr (rd ~-ac le u. S 06 r tiMw1A~ r • ~~1~. - X41 0 ft~T t Name Address f),V G A/, 7 K~ ©C.~ YL1 t AtL L r- _ ~ • 1. >i ~ rr'..~ ~ ~1 S ~f.~F in- 107 -r 77 . t y r To: The Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Coinmittee We, the undersigned owners of homes adjacent to and in the vicinity of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue, wish to protest the property usage pro- posed by the requested zone change from agricultural to suburban-industrial of 7.5 acres (ZE-222-79). Please do not consider this petition, as opposed to our personal appearance, as a sign of apathy or lesser interest. It is because the timing of the hearing, on a work day, at an indefinite hour, makes it extremely difficult for most of us to attend. There are 40 homes (attachment A) most with a current evaluation of from 60 to 100 thousand dollars in this small but densely populated area. The bulk of these homes were individually built on lots purchased from the original two owners who, when they sub-divided, placed covenants on the deeds as to minimum construction value and usage that were intended to uphold property values. We were first isolated from the adjacent residential area to the south by the freeway and subsequently eroded by gradually encroaching industrial and commercial zoning on the perimeters. This final proposed change would complete the job, placing dire<-! across from the east boundary of the area (an area that would certa i r be zoned R-1 residential anywhere @Ow-w in the valley or city) an industrial operation that would be operating sixteen hours a day, that would be under high-intensity illumination all night long, that would bring noise pollution from the same source, and that would invite heavy truck: traffic directly through the area, since Shannon Avenue is one of only two exits from the proposed faci I i ty. A comparitive appraisal by a professional appraiser (attachment B), made on the home directly across Woodruff Road at 9 821 East Shannon shows a projected appraised decline in value of $35,000.00. This home's bed- room windows would be less than 80 feet from the truck parking area, would be illuminated all night and flooded with diesel noise and exhaust. The appraiser also advises that the adjacent proposed usage would make it almost impossible for a purchaser to obtain a mortgage on this home, placing the present owner in a position of being inversely condemned without comp- ensation, and unable to find a buyer. The additional proportional depre- ciated value of the balance of the area's homes would definitely be in the thousands of dollars. Even the more distant homes would be subject to the unsightly night illumination and heavy truck traffic. Some of us have lived here for over 25 years when the area was truly agricultural. (attachment C) We cannot and do not deny that light-indus- trial and commercial zoning is inevitable adjacent to the railroads to the north. However, we strongly protest when it is allowed to directly adjoin our prior-existing borders with no buffer zoning or without even an attempt to l i m i t its use to an operation with minimum irritant factors. We bought our homes in good faith, we have paid our full share of for years, we have paid for curbing and paving, we have raised ar' =r=iI! raising scores of children in what has been, up to now, a most e!.;_ I attractive ne i ahborliood environment. I,Ve cannot conceive that t h i s should be ignored in favor of a commercial enterprise that could be more practically located on any of hundreds of acres of Spokane VaIley land aIready zoned for the purpose or land that could be zoned with far less rr~onet~r~~ and L,)ers:-)nal infringement on the rights of so many individuals. Respectfully;, Signatures Attacne v r 1 dame Address -1 S ~C=z r l~ Al, 2007 LC/ 0 yrif C - 2t-o -A 41/ ef 91, c _ ~ it ~ L•- 1 ~ L. - ~ sl S c - Ll 7 cry ~ - 9 0, L C\ 10 Ztl~ Name Address 1 /-7 -71~ ooe .40F t ~ L i L r - r NN 71 1A, J Z, z YI 4:2 girl 14M 1 r 1 S7 ZIE l ,V 944 CHARLES E. MCCOLLIM REAL ESTATE APPRAISER a CONSULTANT P.O. BOX 6242 MANITO STATION (509) MA 4-7557 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99203 . : ? ` March 5,1980 William Miller E. 9821 Shannon Ave. Spokane,Washington 99206 Dear Mr.Miller: At your request I have made an inspection and appraisal of the property you own at the above address. The purpose of the appraisal is to estimate the before and after value of the property if a large truck repair facility is allowed to be built,directiy east of the subject. The improvements consist of a tri-level frame house built in 1955,and containing some 1,100 sq. ft. The lower level has a living room,the furnace,and utility room.There is a fireplece.in the living room.The mid level has the kitchen and a large family room with fireplace.The upper level has the 3 Bedrooms and 1~ baths. The overall condition of the house is very good. The roof is split shaks.There is a 1 car attached garage. The setting of the house allows for a view over the valley and the surronding hills. The general range of value in the area seems to run from a low of $35,000 to a high of maybe $100,000. The lower value house is a rental but loo+<cd to ba in goad t~-o fair sharp the balance of the housesall appeared well maintained. In addition to the subject house you have a vacant lot directly north of the property, that before the advent of the commercial usage,would have sold for about $139000. With the current commercial usage,it is my opinion that the value would be no more than $10,000 at this time. If the proposed new commercial enterprise is allowed to go in,it would in my opinion render the lot usless. It would not be a good lot for residential use,and small for commercial.So you would have a projected loss of $10,000 on the lot. The house in my opinion has a value today of $75,000. And could be readily financ;EiC. After the new commercial with all the noise,truck traffic,lights ect, goes in I know I would surely take a long look at the property if I were called to make an appraisal for loan purposes,and if I had another outlet for the money would reject the subject property as not being a good residential risk. It is my opinion that the value of the property would be diminished by at least t25,000,and you would loose a great part of the market,becausa of the commercial usage i; going on right next to the property. . So we have a before value estimate for the entire parcal of ;85,000 and an after estimate of $50,000,So yqu old suffer a $35,000 loss as t result of this "inverse condemnation. " Respec fu ly submitted W ~ a arles ccollim CHARLES E. MCCOLLIM ReAL EfTATQ APPRAISQR s CONSULTANT 8506 BEN BURR BLVD. (509) KE 4-9614 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99208 LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. That the legal description is assumed to be correct. 2. No responsibility legal in character, nor is any opinion of title rendered herein. 3. The property is appraised as though free and clear as indicated. 4. The information given to me by the owner is assumed to be correct. 5. Testimony or attendance in court, will not be required, by reason of the opinion, with reference to the property, unless arrangements have been previously made therefore. CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that I personally inspected the property described and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements and opinions expressed in this report are correct and that I have no interest present or prospective therein; and that neither the employ- ment nor the right to make the estimate, nor the compensation is contingent upon the amount of the valuation reported. CHARLES E. MCCOLLIM ReAL ESTAT[ APPRAIS[R : CONSULTANT P.O. BOX 0242 MANITO STATION (509) MA 4-7557 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99203 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE APPRAISER EXPERIENCE: Real Estate Salesman for R.D. Staeheli & Co. from Feb. 1952 to Oct. 1953. Real Estate Salesman for Hege Co. from Oct. 1953 to Sept. 1955. Vice-President of and appraiser for J.L. Cooper Co. from Sept. 1955 to Feb. 1967. Have made numerous appraisals for Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., Western and Southern Life Insurance Co., Business Mens Assurance Co., Mortgage Associates, Inc. Have completed fee assignments for City of Spokane, Fairway Finance Co., Pacific Northwest Bell, Dominican Sisters of Washington, Atlantic Richfield Co., Hometown Finance Co., Farmers and Merchants Bank of Rockford, Securities Intermountain Inc., Federal Housing Administration, Veterans Administration, Bankshares Mortgage Co., Spokane County Airport Board, Spokane Tribe of Indians, AVCO Financial Services, Lincoln First Federal Savings & Loan, Numerous Credit Unions, Numerous Attorneys, Individuals and Real Estate Companys in matters concerning farms, residential and commercial properties. Assistant-Secretary and Manager of the Mortgage Loan Department of Sherwood and Roberts - Spokane Inc. from Feb. 1967 to April 1969. Currently engaged as a fee appraiser. QUALIFICATIONS: Completed the course conducted by the Society of Real Estate Appraisers in Spokane, Washington, under the direction of George Swarthout in Nov. 1961, and passed the written examination. Completed Real Estate Course 1, conducted by the American Institute of Real Estate Appraisers, under the direction of Robert Fleshman, at Portland, Oregon, in Feb. 1962 and successfully passed the written examination. Passed the written examination given by the State of Washington Depart Tie nt o "If Highways, on Right of Way and Condemnation Appraising. Qualified as an expert witness in the Superior Court in the County of Spokane, and have testified in matters of condemnation, estate and other valuations. Qualified as an expert witness in the United States District Court in north Idaho, and have testified as such in matters of condemnation, estate and other valuations. Completed the course given by the Federal Housing Administration, and passed the written examination, and have been a fee appraiser for them since 1957. Passed the written examination by the Veterans Administration and am a fee appraiser for them. N-P C) A FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson rc456-5786 It'll 3~' t„ f TT. (y►_,[;c,;, , a' SPOKANE WASHINGTON asny, 99260 February 26, 1980 SPOKANE (_00141 I CCLRi -OUSE TO: JIM MANSON, ACTING PLANNING DIRECTOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT, FROM: LLOYD L. DYKES FIRE MARS RE: ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS SCHEDULES FOR MARCH 6, 1980 Adequate water and distribution of such water for fire protection is required. A water and emergency vehicle access plan is required prior to development. This condition shall be applicable to the following zone reclassifications: ZE9-80 ZE170A-78 ZE-15-80 ZE-222-79 ZE-3-80 ZS-13-80 LLD/ba *Per 9,1,E pr9 c 49 4 k- 5POIKANE VALLE(I PIUvE DLPAPATPIENT 4""A& &&W4 7~ ;V"1 e~w vl;olx ag / EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 February 21, 1980 Marcia M. Raines Zoning Administrator North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington Dear Ms. Raines, • The following zone reclassifications have been reviewed for fire protection ZE-155-78 Rudy %IIZE-222-79 Diversified Planning & Dev. ZE- 9-80 Schimanski f ZE-170A-78 Unicume ZE- 3-80 Diversified Planning & Dev. The above need mains and hydrants to be installed in the areas. Access plans fore firefighting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. r , r Sincerely4A1 , ook Awl. Lt. of Inspectors f AC:sn SPOKANr COUNTY pL~IICINI~!r, DE°;?RTMEPIT PRE VENT FIRES SAVE LIVES FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE ~(It=`"~•;--°;t N. 811 Jefferson 3 tt~~~"~Fi 456-5786 ;'jiil ~`aX`~' 1111 +~r~,•;,TM,~~,,; ~.M SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 91M 99260 February 11, 1980 SPOnANE COUNT', GT HOI.SE • TO: JIM MANSON, DIRECTOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM.: LLOYD L'. DYKE ' FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 6, 1980 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall be required. A water plan is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development for the following: ZN-15-80 ZE-9-80 ZE-170-78A ZE-222-79 ZE-3-80 ZS-13-80 ZE-14-80 r. LLD/ba CHARLES E. MCCOLUM REAL ESTATE APPRAISER & CONSULTANT 3506 BEN BURR BLVD. (509) KE -a F, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99209 LIMITING CONDITIONS 1. That the legal description is assumed to be correct. 2. No responsibility legal in character, nor is any opinion of title rendered herein. 3. The property is appraised as though free and clear as indicated. 4. The information given to me by the owner is assumed to be correct. 5. Testimony or attendance in court will not be required, by reason of the opinion, with reference to the pr(-)perty, unless arrangements ve hF.en ,ire-. 1 ou..1 , i1-.ade t?iereforc . 1 ilereDy cerL:i y ttzat L personaily inSpecCed L"je_ property aescrlE-c,d and that to the best of my knowledge and belief the statements and opinions expressed in this report are correct and that I have no interest present or prospective therein; and that neither the employ- ment nor the right to make the estimate, nor the compensation i~ contingent upon the amount of the valuation reported. STAFF REPORT DATE: March 6, 1980 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-222-79 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Diversified Planning and Development Consultants STATUS OF APPLICANT: Agent PROPERTY OWNER: Larry Sinclair EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural REQUESTED ZONING: Restricted Industrial PROPOSED USE: Sales, service, engineering, repair offices for Cummins Northwest Diesel PROJECT LOCATION: The site is located at the southeast corner of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 7.5 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site gently slopes downwards towards the northeast with a greater slope downwards towards the northwest at the intersection of Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The area north of the site is in a transition from undeveloped land to industrial uses. The remaining area has retained a single family rural atmosphere, excluding the below grade freeway to the south. LAND USE: Site Duplex, dog kennels, grazing North Business park, business park under construction East Single family, pasture West Single family, undeveloped South Interstate 90, single family ZONING: North Restricted Industrial, established, 1974 East Agricultural, established, 1955 West Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 South Agricultural Suburban, established, 1953 III pR rt ' ' I A R 11C In I _ - DRIvE vE'Q £L /9 48 R f`' ' ~ asp A N E "i E 9p""@ - j - POST -OFFICE t!-r++~~ rr.~ u Emn _ •+.r. r t . j~~ _ _ + . I fr, -ill ~ e1gvlF_v►~• ~ L ~L_. - 4 2 t V J ig h 3 3 AaL~ ~L X00 D 12 A 450? BUCKEYE a i~ - AIrIN tG-4M R Oft. J4( Erl ID Dr, Mc+KTGOMERy q% Of • - 8 ~ r . \ Spy ' A £L. 1969 'A APA u KW 7j- Fm 09 J ~ '.C"'' sN~.NNON Sm.^ N SHANNON V V 1._►11(lI ITT t C Z FIR IL 14DIAN - PA t ( - Ens v b. -1 49 .7 W 1 - - I ~ _Y ~ itA J~ J c 0 r , M 151 ON v1IJ_ - w 1 a W ,,wct~ O o a J fr $ w ~ s00NE * - "41 ~OVR 1 _ 1000 =r 3 - - f- c ~ tai OV 1 ~Il~~wt• r f C : O R DES FT A a F ADO A L B 55 J ~A 1/ 2 20/0 17 , i t, 11 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION' "UMBER: ZE-222-79 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential Neighborhood/ Industrial NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 3 NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 1 Total Square Feet Approximately 39,600 sq. ft. Percent of Coverage 12.1% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 PARKING REQUIRED: Wholesale/heavy machinery 40 spaces PROVIDED: Auto - 115; Tractor - 31; Trailer - 8; Total - 154 III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In recent years, areas to the north of this site have been rezoned to Res- tricted Industrial. Consideration should be given to landscaping of the west side of the site due to the residential neighborhood located on Woodruff Road. The site plan also indicates that the east 245 feet will not be developed at this time. The applicant will be requied to submit a development plan for the area to the Hearing Examiner Committee prior to issuance of building permits. The Spokane County Health District has commented that this project lies over the Spokane Aquifer; is within Critical Water Supply Service Area #3 and service area of Modern Electric Company. Soils are suitable for use of on-site sewage disposal systems. It lies within the 208 study recommended Primary Sanitary Sewer Area. Disposal of sewage effluent beneath paved surfaces may be prohibited. IV. AGENCIES RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall be required for this project. A water plan is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIC VUMBER: ZE-222-79 b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Woodruff Road and a 20 foot radius on Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue for right-of-way. 2. Applicant must work with adjacent property owners to the west to construct a cul-de-sac at the south end of Woodruff Road. 3. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and pave to existing pavement on Woodruff Road and Knox Avenue. 4. An appropriate off-site drainage disposal system and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 5. A detailed combined on-site sewage system and surface water disposal plan for the entire project shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit. 6. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by vehicles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. A combined sewage and surface water disposal plan shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer and Spokane County Health District prior to issuance of any building permits. 2. Water service shall be from Modern Electric Company only. 3. Sanitary plumbing shall be installed to facilitate connection to an area-wide sewerage system. 4. The owner, his heirs and assigns shall agree to participate in and not protest assessments for any local improvement district for sewering to serve this property. 5. Connection to area-wide sewer collection system shall be made when the system becomes available. ZONE RECLASSI FICATIUP UMBER: ZE-222-79 IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.210.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 2. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. r Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administra- tor shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accord- ance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 5. The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits for the eastern 245 feet of the rezoned area. PLANNING DEPARTMENT J '~'S BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 :EFFERSON STREET '0~' ,L.1•~'r I ~I~ I ~1^y~~w^"fit PHONE 456-2205 "'.;1L'd +~,~.7~.(~ as SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 5POMANE CJUttrY LRT H C U S E CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1. Department of Ecology 2. Social & Health Services 3. Health District 4. KREM TV 2 5. Mr. Ray Card, 208 Coordinator 6. Audubon Society 7. Town of Millwood 8. Department of Transportation FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: ZE-222-79, CUMMINS NORTHWEST DIESEL This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to be either an interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on February 20, 1980. Please respond, if appropriate, on or before March 5, 1980. The subject proposal or action IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be prepared. A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for March 6, 1980, to be held in Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. Enclosures Revised •12/1/79 Q File # ~~-=-2-7y Sec. T'sh'p R'ge 44 Classification ~v 7- ~s 1415 X.- I Proponent Gt1MNt~~yS S P O K A N E C O U N T Y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subse- quently been reviewed by the IMM/M.11 The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Actions(s) Requested: Zone Change v~ Preliminary Plat Approval ; Final Plat Approval Change of Condition ; Other a por ttor, a B. Description of Proposal: /Sell V., -41 4,41 ?G: h e- ~El7 ri (JnM /1 /E' //f hD i S Q k c(e rC3 kvs heewi ef cs proper n +4 be -e(opc cif -fAis f•~+~ C. Location of Proposal: ~ St'f E rS (o eG feC( C4 -Xo- f•'~ r n er a 1 f n ; ; _!,"'f " f7 Y ; ,O II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) -Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) Air (9) Natural (16) _,,,:,--Utilities Resources (3) Water (10) Risk of Upset (17) Human Health (4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Recreation (6) Noise (13) __,,,-~i'rans/Circ (20) Arch/Hiss (7) Light/Glare (14) Pub!ic (21) Other Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: C3) W 64P,- Revised 6/1/79 s C. Discussion of impacts identified above: ,j ter LOrts2e,- 4io; L)III~e u,j&):6 nOteeenn-4 tit clad brm III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of non- significance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recom- mends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: Revised 6/1/79 aR (r NARr N(~p ~ l • 109 DRIVE ~ r r vf _ - ` £L /9 !d 1 E R ' R a N 4641 ft---2 22m,- 79. - - POSLOFFICE Q , . A ~ ftv Is. t ~ ~ r ~ I ENS EUE r?_` ,pZR Amos 11 "t . L ~ Farttv~EV►~~, ~ J `tt D Hill t' E_ 0 4502 " G BU KEYS MONTGOMERY OR ~w 0 % `a O f Y EL /969 NOAJ ~c V &4 Fm J 'L 3H:-NNON: ND1AN~ v S - N r IL RA z ► / _ 44, D r 2 iJZ~ 1~ - - V 1 • C M ISS I ON WIN SINTO Q rv rn~ l w " ~^.x I L L I vit _2 a t rr $ . w 600 N E F 1 :1000 F. W Uu Cr r - tY n~ a rw • S t ~ - it DES CT a C c T A L_DQ jj t_ L Ar MA rr L ?0/0 R -1 17 • r R sip" . a y 1. File # ZE -e?eU-1S Sec . -Twp -Rge. 8 of 4A~ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C, RCW. requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely'', as Der 'WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. 'he -,urpose 'nis --necklist •s 'o Iiep the agencies i^- valved determine wnether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can witn the info rat,on oresently availaoie to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you bell a an exoianation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided. or use additional ages. if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and whicn are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the pro- posal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your orooosal when it is completed. even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow ail of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paoerwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for ever 'ves" and "r►a be" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for "no" answers, and in some cases, more oetai ed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: (_~cl~~►1!!I5 /V,W O/e- Sd yt~ Di~lF.es/ tai lgiY.JWone Number y'?L- S/.>',~',f 2. Address of Proponent: 5 c Z d 3. Gate Checklist Suamitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: ;77777-71j:47 Name of Proposal, if Applicabie: 6. Nature and Brief Oescription of the rogosai (including but not limited to its size, genera design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): 'cSi4/ ~i/ice s~ s~!f~'~ 7" g~-e ?c Al I z_,-7 -C 4r f-c1~ ~,,A.f Loa 06"1 0 r.,f/ 4-goy el ger c c vim-, 7 y 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the proposal. as well as the extent of the land area affected ty any environmental impacts, incluainc any o~per inforrmma~tion needed to give an ccurate unaerstanding~of,~~_0t~e environ- ,yey 47 A A/' oC, `C4, mental setting of the proposal): ,,ou e`-.DST C e 2 er Ci S . e SIT s0 G~ G Gc/ ~t°GU/ . 3. Estimated Oate for Cam l etion of the Proposal: /tee 9. List of all Permits. Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal. state and local - inc'.udinc rezones) : (4,1 /-WW/- ~G ~itv 1~ - d~~a~rs ^ / zi- z~~/rt (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 10a. Oo you. or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land. have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain: axe. J-/rte 6~ r-- ~ e-;-? 7`" .Pti~iYf~~rr9' 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, exolain: ~G 11. Oo you know of any plans by others includi~ngg the owner which may affect the property covered by your proaosai or land adjacent or nearby? :f yes, explain: . 12. Attach any other application form that has been comoleted reaardina the proposal; if none has teen completed. but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: rid A&4z,t .czar` 1,<C-I ,21 i.y G Cfia X E /r f II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS i'Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maw be Vo 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: - (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Disruptions. displacements, comoaction or overcovering of the soil? . . . . . . . (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? . . . . . . . . . . . _ (a) The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? . . . . . i (IF SP. EXPLANATION 15 INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADD L PAGES.) (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or chances in siltation, deposition or erosion whicn may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Expla_ natian• v 9 " ax e 00 67 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe N,oy~ (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . . . . . . . • . • (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (c) Alteration of air movement. moisture or temperature, or any change in climate. ither locall or region/all-y? . . . . . , . . . . . . . . _ AV. Xkzd-'( A/114/ Explanation: i f 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature. dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? . . . . . . . . . (g) Change in the quantity of gound waters, eigner through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . • • • • . • . • • • . (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of le!achate. phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the Bound waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public ter supplies? _ . . . . . . . . Explanation: Lie (7 e C7- 3. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or number of any soecies of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops. microflora and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered soecies of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenisnment of existing species? . . . . . . . . . (d) Reduction i ac of n cuitu_ral crop? . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No / (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds. land animals includinq reptiles, fish and ,}i shellfish. benthic organism , insects or microfauna)? . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Qeduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area. or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (d) Oeterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _ Explanation: 5. Noise. Yes Maybe 110 (a) 'sill the proposal increase existing noise levels?, ; . . . . . . . • • - Exolanation• Liant and Glare. Yes Ma be vo (a) 'di 111 the p posa.; produce n light or glare? . . . . . • • • • _ Exolanation: j- J 1 2 (IF SF )R EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH At AL PAGES.' 8. Land Use. 0 Yes w yoe No (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned 1 d use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - it) Explanat n: ~2 /I A's 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . . . . . . • • • _ Explanation: Nips,i ['e.-etc "cA, ar ~r.J c_1~ e /A5;'n( CPsyC]C tOl Hobe ~`+c 10. Risk of Uoset. Ooes the proposal involve a resk of an explosion or the Yes. release o hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals. or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 11. Population. Yes Maybe No will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: r ara* 12. - Housi . Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: r 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? . . . . . . . . _ (c) Impact upon existing transoortation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • _ (e) Alterations to waterborne. rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles. bicyclists/ or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Exolanation: .64~ic~Z'"44-' 0y IGIGU, d~~22 ! 772 ,d -17 ~ G' 14. Public Services. 'dill the proposal have an effect upon, or result 4avoe 14C in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of of the following areas: (a) Fire Protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - Expianation: .Czl c~ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES. 15. Energy. Will the prooosai result in: Yes Mavo,e vo (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or reouire the development of new sources of energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ q Exolanation• 2'1~ L- -T~ 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, Yes Mavbe NQ or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . ;b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • - (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 3 ( E FOR EXPLANATION :S :VAOEGUATE. PLEASE AT-AC TONAL PAGES.) (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . , , ; Explanation:, z ~ 1! Yes !fie .40 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potentia hetith hazard (excluding mental health)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . J~ r Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or vie open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity f existing recreational opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: 20. Arcreola ical/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a Yes Mayee signir cant arcneo ogical or historical site. structure. object or building? . . . . . . _ Explanation: II:. SIGNATURE 1. the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. G Proponent : 3~%s,Dau : (Please ,Print or Type) r Proponent: ~nli .CGFL.'Fr Address: YF2-1 Z- Phone: z z Person com~aleting forte: Phone: X Gz-- y3-)7 Oate: /no Oepartment or Office of County Reviewing .heTkl ist: ZD/LIi il//~ Staff Memberls) Reviewing Checklist: r ti t AII : OF [ :['ARTMENT O SOC: AND HEALTH SERVICES WASI lIN(,'I'O1 Uixy Lev Kay MEMORANDUM ( i werm)► 'l O: Bill Dobratz February 25, I )A f L , 1980 County Utilities FROM: Dan Sander tiUf3JECT: We have received a number of zone change applications from the Planning Department for proposals within the critical water supply service areas which did not adequately address water systems. 1. ZE-9-80 Ebco Steel Builders, Inc. This project is in the Vera water service area and Vera presently has water available. 2. ZE-222-79 Cummins Northwest Diesel - This proposal is within the Modern Electric service area. They also have water available. 3. ZE-3-80 West Valley Builders is a small commercial development at Pines and 32nd is within the existing Washington Water Power service area. 4. ZS-13-80 Harry Wilson - small commercial center on Palouse Highway which is within the City of Spokane's existinq water service area. Your follow-up on these items will be greatly appreciated. DS:ei cc: Marcia Raines - Planning Dept. I~. FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson 456-5786 . J )l ~a . ~i_ . 1.,b, ;,.i, 0047 1. „a. ;..fill ~;k;;=; SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 992= 99260 , j February 11, 1980 SPpKANE COl't.T. 'IIGT HD!'cTO: JIM MANSON, DIRECTOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: LLOYD L. DYKE ' FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS SCHEDULED FOR MARCH 6, 1980 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall be required. A water plan is required to be submitted for approval prior to any land development for the following: ZN-15-80 ZE-9-80 ZE-170-78A ZE-222-79 ZE-3-80 ZS-13-80 ZE-14-80 LLD/ba OFF.L%.,E OF COUNTY ENGI)NzER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date tohrmim iS Inter-office Communication To ZoyAsg Admini s t ra to r from CountyBogiaaer Subject n 222.79 # 4 - 5' on Woodruff Rd. &ad 20' radius on Woodruff Rd. and Knox Ave. SpactaL: Applicant must work with adjacent property owners to the west to construct a cu1-da -sac at the south and of Woodruff Rd. #I2 • on Woodruff sde and Knox Ave. - #L7 X18 444101. J 0/7 Form 327-C R. FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Dater Iro Application No: 2,e5 " Z Z Z- 7~ i~i ~"1e~J f lali K► Name of Applicant: _ , ~ s A/. ~ ve r s D Ue__~ &I", e ly r22 w Street Address of Applicant: .z-. =99 G N State: Telephone No. City: Existing Zoning Classification: 4 ~r Date Existing Zone Classification Established: I q S i Existing Use of Property: ~S Proposed Zone Classification: Proposed Use of Property: e i. 1.2,"~ w 4/1 Legal Description of Property: ~ (/LJ I N CO- ~7 017 ell, 7 ' r" Section: $ Township 02S Range: Source of Legal: "/I- S ~So s -//r-S Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 08~~'y - 0,20 G D 8 S2' y -c~~oT Property Size: S -f c . Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: A40 n Street Address of the Property: /OcF /Vor7~~ lNyocXr-t. /20a'C~/ Who Holds Title to the Property: If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it G - Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of recoru, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subJect property. -1- Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel mike this proposal warranted? e. s 7 `zc /0-,o JP_ lcas c k' ~,j3 ~c e Q ~ti e D uJ k e r -e I S NOT t ~on~ o r►1 r c.4L To 'S- k-~ v" a e / 2 . What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? /vo~Vt r v e C-Y c 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) /V-D. r c L~Y` S s •-e cis c= l o.t ~a~~ cJa 41eJ a I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. (Signed) ,g (Date) - 2 - ZONING WORKSHEET Form C Application # zE - Z LL- 79 This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to rem sent a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed below.) PART I - to be comQleted by Spokane County Engineer A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed 1) State DOT Review required: Ye s x_No . 2) A"le Access to be limited to: 3)~ Access permit is required. 4) a. .Dedication for right-of-way is required. ( S' feet on wo s oar's Road, Street, Avenue.) b . - = Radius ( %Z ~ foot) is required (On wd o e?Ir v _~V li~W and ~h~ vc Road, Street, Avenue.) C. Slope easement is required , 5) C~ Drainage Plan is required. on-site off-site. 6) Paving Permit is required. 3o feet on wow e,/, Road.) 7) `P Curb is required, (along h v.< Wee g~ .✓ORoad , Street, Avenue.) 8) y~° s Sidewalk is required. (along X max 1/Ya ear oad, Street, Avenue.) 9) yP_5 Applicant must be willing to participate in future LID/RID, 10) Legal description is acceptable as reviewed. Parcel No. Comments: d2 1, Signed Date ZONING WORKSHEET--continued-2 tART_II -to be completed by Spokane County Utilities Department A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Utilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development is is located in a public sewer service area operated and maintained by Spokane. County. 2) A storm drainage pla96yis not required for the proposal. Comments: 7gned Da to PART III- to be completed by Spokane County Water Purveyor Z, 0CA'1 7-1 C 1 u TPACT 264 .566 8 T- ;ZS e 4q A , Water Supply A PP Eox_ N 1) The proposed development is located with the district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agreement/arrangement has/has not been made to serve this proposal. 3) We are/apeonot able to supply this development with adequate potable water. 4) We are/are not able to supply this development with adequate water for fire flow, 5) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other: < 6) Water system .is/is not under State Utilities jurisdiction. 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: inches. 8) Distance to main: feet. B , to be completed by Applicant 1) Individual water supply will be developed with/without fire protection capabilities. Comments: Signed Date C . If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Department of Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to application. 1) I/We have reviewed the proposal. It appears to meet State requirements for public water. Signed - D.S.H.S. ZONING WORKSHEET continued-3 PART IV - to be completed by Spkokane County Fire Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District #_l 2) Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Fire flow is/ no dequate for proposed development d s is not required. 4) FS Main (s) need to be installed. 5) Hydrant(s) need to be installed. 6) jVhL- - Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) 7) Nearest fire hydrant is feet. 8) Driving distance to nearest fire station is 1 gCmments: ~ J ~ //,o Signed Date PART V - to be completed by Spokane County Health District A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: ~~.a-~-•- 2) Air quality is ( in a concern with this proposal. 3) Ground water qualit r~~is not a concern with this proposal. 4) Noise s is not a concern with this proposal.- k o~ -=u- . 5) Light s is not a concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: t r .~t~ vwt f _ /Z ;44~ ~ "Lt/7 Sig Da e r I fit ( ►`+~R~ µlrQ Q f -L 1 9 *d ~ E fZ - f • --222~-79 JLI POS.I-GFFICE z , ~F J EK bj1Ij r ~erR~iFy~ LI - r `I LL J \ J &Y 6o% A. JE 0 FAIRY I F- vy -J mill* 11 °45~~? o t GJ l~" \,'•,c BUCKEYE T \ t • N CL /969 Of "0 two _ o K Qk ' A us r4 r. U ~~'t N 1,1 0 N t SHAN Nr)N 111 s NDIA14 e - -J . RA J 0 ' 7 { j -J 1 ti , Irl `ti1 MISSION ~ - ; ~ : 1 1 l~ 1 r 1 Y SANTO n cc %A" WEI r11 1 t f ? o l O,. I E340 P1 E 1 :1000 V; ti.. ~o! ~jr - , W ~ `OV ~ Cf/1~rrrQ r A 9 Q 4 DESMPT E bdAl t nN z i d R ~Y -y Lea AFFIDAVIT OF PIAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) GINGER JOHNSON 's:-_9 Being first duly sworn o oa d,,oses and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of over America and a resident of the State of Washington, age of eighteen years. That on the 24 & 27 day of MARCH 19f8, I-personally deposited in the United States mail at OPPORTUNITY STATION with sufficient postage prepaid, a ofu which c~srattached of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy reference, to the hereto and incorporated herein by re recorded real property owners and/or taxpayrs, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records 19 80 who 13th day of MARCH have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and did notice adjacent property owners to the site by certified mail. The notices were addressed ose individuals and sent to those naddresses as herein by and the attachment attached hereto .reference. DATED this 27th day of MARCH , 19 8C. day of SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this 0009 WASHINGTON NOTARY PUBL IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, Residing a Spokane, Washington APPLICATION NUMBER 9 Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the fo1 "n,...7it,;, list of names and addresses has been prepared from the latest. available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct. g r-,c . For: ,~~,~a-h • r i 7`~.~ Date. ~O AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on ~,4 Pcfi ~g 1979, he personally posted a true and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane County, to-wit: '52tA~ T[ L S/ C G t-, e r D T I'! c 1[ cZ it cX WC 0 c ~x r L t t K iz a U' IL e v L, qla. IJo 1- AA- v.&) f Cc e L. Q e Ap ant or Agent Subscribed and sworn to me 190,6. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington ZJff ;7 9 AGENDA, MARCH 6, 1980 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 1. ZE-155-78 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS: RESIDENTIAL OFFICE ZONE (Approximately located on the east side of Mullan Road, 170 feet south of Broadway Avenue. Section 17-25-44) Request: Conditions "h" and "i" of the original zone reclassification be removed; (h. Only one story buildings will be allowed.); (i. A 6' cyclone fence shall be constructed on the east property line.). Applicant: RUDY (.98 Acres' 2. ZE- 9-80 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO COMMERCIi' (Northwest corner of Sprague Avenue ai Road. Section 14-25-44) Proposed Use: Commercial Retail Cep, Applicant: SCHIMANSKI (2.47 3. ZE-170A-78 AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Northwest corner of Pines Road and Sinto Avenue. Section 16-25-44) Proposed Uses: Retail Business/Office Complex Applicant: UNICUME (3.5 Acres) 4. ZN- 15-80 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE TO LOCAL BUSINESS (Approximately located on the west side of Division Street, 220 feet south of Holland Avenue. Section 19-26-43) Proposed Uses: Office and small commercial uses. Applicant: DIVERSIFIED PLANNING & DEV. (1 Acre) 5. ZE-222-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRII`' (Southeast corner of Woodruff Road a+►G ►,;flux Avenue. Section 8-25-44) Proposed Use: Sales/Service/Engineering/kepdir, Offices. Applicant: DIVERSIFIED PLANNING & DEV. (7.5 Acres) 12:00 NOON - - - - - LUNCH (Place to be announced at the Hearing) 1:30 P.M. RECONVENE H cr ~ . a~()RlvE , .;Q•*►FL 1948 vER 45 Q N - 1,. SF00 I I , . jr _ Q L% \ P06-1 OFFICE 1 - O-J L AV • IDL M/ r r ~1►.~irS r ►A~RF O G fit.. - - ~-1 i•• _ - I F ' J PA„frrr~M Fr, Z W to. _ vpa -\EL 196g •s Ac NJM - _ U PIN _ K►JOk rc y L- sN NNON NON 97 f- NDIAINA J - - . r ~ r r 0 2 Z r MISSION S IN TO n A. - Q Mi w t►► • 1 Z t o `t au i' D4010 F V) _1000 3 ► ~4,~ @A. R ` ~ (r c►w a w7 ~ r ` Z DES~I[T t TAI. a C _DO A r- ' DEA y 4 rr r t 8 os AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) GINGER JOHNSON Being first duly sworn on oa , d~fo-s-es/Aan-cf says: That I am a citizen of the United States of Americi and a resident of the State of WashinP ~.~:i age of eighteen years.. That on the 1.'n day U t r, lilbItLbAi- >I > 19 I personally deposited in the United States mail at OPPORTUNITY STATION POST OFFICE with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct cod.., of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attache' hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to thy- recorded real property owners arid/or taxpayers, as showy on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of thy- 16th day of FEBRUARY , 19_$Q_, who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and did notice adjacent property owners to the site by certified mail. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachmeri i < l Fll_'._ f; 'r. -1 _ ± hk rr'ln by reference. DATED this 22nd day of FEBRUARY 19 80 SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this day f ~L~ - 19 < NOTARY PUBLIC L AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON APPLICATION NUMBER ,G Now C ` j AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) KEN KIRSCH , Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on FEBRUARY 25, 19R2l,80 he personally posted a true and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane County, to-wit: -POSTED ON N.W. CORNER OF PROPERTY FACING KNOX AND WOODRUFF pp icant or Agent ` Subscribed and sworn to me FEBRUARY 26 , 19 80. NOTARY PU LIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington 7F, Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the foll'owing list of names and addresses has been prepared from the latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct. Sign For: Date: 5 r ~I I c i R. law= + 6. 3 n A X94- C ~ 77-55 23 _ ki 50-74C ~:~L.•JLy -i - I _f 6 Q .41 A o6a 12- Its ,e N N E5 6 26T N 26 R_ -1 QI 6~ r If 22 TIC L ` 4 !77• 55 L. jib AU4~DA w JA ~7 r 6 " , ti V' L E A L 0 E S C R 1 P T 1 0 N L I 5 FEd' 4RY 16, ARY 16 , 1980 SPOKANE COUNTY REAL LAND FILE PARCEL OGCUMENT NUMdER NUMBER ASSESSEG OWNfR LEGAL OESCRIPTICN OF PROPERTY TAXPAY r~ TAXPAYER 08544-0206 1159286 MET MTG 6 SEC ~ OPPORTUNITY fVl/2 EXC EQUITABLE SE HWY 8266 2UU401797 ABLE S&L 01797 08544-02U7 1159286 MET MTG E SEC's OPPORTUNITY 51/2 EXC S1NGlAIR LA N HMY 826b N 2168 NGOD SPOKANE WA AIR LAWRENCE J G8 WCODRUFF RD ANE WA 99206 08544-0208 b10112A A G TRINKLE'~ OPPORTUNITY PT Of 8267 TRINKLE ALBE RTI~iED M Ail EXC BEG Ai IKT QF EL N[TH NL OF PSH 2 TH N1G4FT TH W133FT TH N 2J21 FELT 5162.7 FT TG Nl OF HNY TO PUB &EXC HNY SPOKANE WA LE ALBERT $S 21 FELTS RD ANE WA 99206 08544-0203 5219976 DANIEL BROWN OPPORTUNITY S1/2 Of ROB ER TS K E /ores /y~/oX ~uQ- E200FT OF w360FT 8252 E 10410 DEA 99anG TS K & MONTEITH E 410 DEAN AVE SPOKANE WA ANE WA 99206 08544-0201 7800194451 MAX Q SPALOING OPPORTUNITY E%C W360FT SPALDING MAX IpNG MAX 0 6lESS HWY 8252 N 2609 PINE SPOKANE WA 09 PINES RD ANE WA 99206 ~o~ C'~Ra~.~ears ~Fd- 4252 EXG N2LOfT E EXG HWY 13-122694 1 ST FED S&L SPO 22694 T C~R~I~`~~ ~~f1~.g~ R L ASBURY ~ OPPORTUNITY M160FT OF PAG 1ST FED 08544-0216 7100148716 R d BGNUCGEILI'~ GPPGRTUNIlY N346.2F7 OF LINO MUT SAV MUT SAV BK 06 G.~eoxe ~fiotica,~eay E142FT OF TR 253 EXG RDy 6 1 3291 B 3291 8 99ax ~ ~ 08544-0217 7411010113 GUNNING BLDF.RS OPPGRTUNITY E200fT OF GUNN[N~ 9U1L ~ TR 253 EXC N346.2FT GP E142FT 6 EXC WB1FT UP E223FT OF N1l2 OF E 9616 MGNT CERTIFIED MAlL~ TR 253 EXC RC SPpKANE WA NG BUILDERS INC 16 MGNTGOMERY AVE ANE WA 99 206 C8544-0215 7411010113 GUNNING ELDERS ~ CPPGRTUNITY il81FT OF LING MUT SAV PUT SAV BK 06 E223FT OF NI/2 OF TR 253 EXG RD 6 1 3908 7 3908 7 08544-0214 741t010113 GUNNING BLOERS OPPORTUNITY NL/2 OF TR '153 GUNNINv BUIL EXG E223FT E EXG RD E 9615 MONT SPOKANE NA N~ BUILDERS 15 MU'NTGOMERY AVE ANE WA 99206 ~gQ~~4d~f~,1171~6UNNlNG BLDERS'~ OPPORTUNITY 51/2 Of TR 253 LIMG NUT SAV MUT SAV BK 06 f~r1'111. EXC E200FT E ExC RO 6 1 3747 9 3747 9 GERALD D ~r~6~~~~~l~D9~~AL ~ ~ LBgRo~ ec~sd 4 6EXCRHWYINI/2 EXC7S28FTLEXC ST GSPOKANEMwAO i 30 WOODRUFF RD ANE WA 99206 C8544-03C1 2162258 C R GVERLANO OPPGRTUNITY N1/2 EXC ~4ERLANO C R ~j HMY 8296 N 1827 FELT ~j`~~~~~~~ AIL SPOKANE ivA ANA C REUBEN 27 FELTS RD tfS-.G~ i&~ ANE wA 99206 08544-0320 6115058 AlLIEO PROPERTIE ✓OPP MISSION HILLS H296 PIERCE WIIMA E MCI LMA M ~ 003 NORA AVE ~n~ aAd,zes51 L1 B1 E 10003 NOR ~ SPOKANE WA ANE WA 99206 08544-0321 4861196 D M ALBERTSCN OPP MISSION HiLlS 8296 F1U MU7 SAV C, Io~n1 /UOR4 f~~Q L2 BL 3 1003 2829 991°G UT SAV BK 03 28290 6 08544-0322 859714E DONALD S THGMAS ✓ OPP MISSICh KILLS 8296 SEC INTERMTN C . ~oQ ~ S' Noa9 fly - L3 81 201-813633- 99aoG LATER MTN 813633-0 08544-0323 35633dL MAURICf PLY~N ✓ OPP MISSION FILLS 4296 C(:L MTG TG C,/o~,yi ~o+tq L4 B1 L 46 427 lU 99~c 427 lU9 KK 08544-0387 857964A HAZEL E HURC ~ OPPORTUNITY ti120' OF N45~ RQtNI£R MTG ER MTG qq~q /Voav fl~e• OF S1/2 E 6120 Of 528 GF NL/2 OF BLK 297 398 5 11317 5 113174 ~9~oG 08544-0388 E57964A HAZEL E HURC ✓ OPPORTUNITY h120' GF N120' OIERKS LARRY c.99iS ~Uosa fve OF SL/2 OF BLK 297 ExC N45' E 9905 NORA S LARRY 05 NORA AVEUG y'~~o6 SPGkANE WA ANE WA 99206 C8544-0374 857964A HAZEL E HURD`~ CP?CRTUNITY PT Of 8297 bANCSHARES M 4919 /✓aRv ~'Pw, E90fT OF k210fT Of W300FT Of N120.2FT OF 51 J2 E E90FT OF W210FT 1503673 HARES MTG 673 ~p~Q~ QF S28FT OF kl/2 TG 08544-0375 857964A HAZEL E HURD'~ OPPGRTUN[TY PT OF 8297 SPG MTG 542 99/9 ~~/o~y fi'vv_ E90FT OF W3COFT OF N120.2fT Of S1/2 6 E90FT OF W300FT OF S28Fi OJ05542 OF Nl/2 9v30G 08543-0102 854888 L l LIED OPP PL2 51/2 B3E4 LIES LEON L LECN L !~Ap~A r E7(C ST N 2205 W000 ~+~e~~rFI~D 1~1$'oli~ SPOKANE wA 05 WOODRUFF RD ANE wA 99206 C8543-0168 7600145941 ROBT L TAYLOR CPPGRTUN(TY PL 2 E116~ OF TAYLOR ROBER NlE'2.53' OF N V 2 OF TR 364 E 8422 LAGR SPLKANE NA R ROBERT L ~ 22 LACROSSE AVE ANE WA 99206 Cd543-0123 270112C N R MILLER OPP Pl2 SHA~NCN AC LLB1 MILLER W k! 6 q~e E 9921 SHAN ~~~~@~i~D ~'JIAIL~ SPOKANE WA R W k 21 SHANNON AVE ANE WA 99206 08543-0124 5696126 NANCY DGNLEV OPP Pl2 SHAAAC~ AC L281 DOhLEY NANCY Y NANCY MA--' E 9813 SHAN SPOKANE NA 13 SHANNON AVE ANE WA 99206 08543-0153 8000221550 P A HANTZ OPP PLAT 2-SN4NNCh CITY MTG SER c, q~o~ /~AO,r~'v~ ACRES SUB W75FT OF L3 BL 912892 1 MTG SERVICES 74ngy 92 1 08543-0126 7607080355 L CAUDILI~ OPP PL2 SHA~~Ck AC 1401 SPU MTG TG e. ~~,.y k~.oX ,,avL. 0007173 173 9o~~G 08543-0133 148023 l E ti[LLIAMSCN OPP PL2 SNAf~fvCN AC WILLIAMSQN L Lll BL E 9723 SHAN SPOKANE kA AMSON LYAL E 23 SHANNON AVE ANE WA 99206 c 08543-O1E2 7700156985.RUBERT MYLER CPP PL 2 SHA~kCN AG PIU MST SAV E• 5'Sal '~+rwd~ LETS 12-13 B1 3 1003 2tl12 gvaoc LT SAV BK 03 23125 4 08543-0136 7700166342 NANCY MA[ OCNLEY ✓ OPP PL2 SHAk~CN AC L1NC MUT S4V MUT SAV BK 06 Q g~ ~3 ~`/.annon L 14 B1 6 1 4012 5 4012 5 99ap~ PUT SAV BK 37 2832140 h R MILLER ~ OPP PL2 SHA~fvCN AC LINO MUT SAV ~~~~~'~b ~QIt ~ O1 O1U1450 n 6 1$}f 5~(Snnon. ~`P. LL5 B1 0101450 9Sao~ 08543-0138 S283U2 FREC 9 HIODEN~/ GPP PL2 SHAA~C~ AG L18Z HIDDEN FRED ~1X~~~~~ N 6906 STAN y~ SPOKANE WA N FRED 06 S TANDAR C ST ANE WA 99208 k. ESTERN S&L 08543-0139 7606240875 MAXINE E MA MAU ~ OPP P~2 SHA~NCN AC L2B2 GRT WESTERN 5810 +0.142 =:a'. ,~~.i~s; y4.'~~9..`~ ~(1. logs woe~2~Ji ~o'. OUB 5810 Ol rl9~6! 08543-0140 7700170437 CHAS L BOEVI~G ✓ OPP PL2 SHA~~C~ AC L302 80EVING CHAR E 9808 SHAN SP^"ASE WA NG CHARLES L 08 SHANNON AVE ANE WA 99206 08543-0141 5817866 L E ZIEGLER ~ OPP Pl2 SHANNON AC L4B2 PAL 1ST FEO E 99 S.~iana:. {~/Q tio~ 13-120 L 14 6 ST FED S EL SP O 20114 6 i 0.8543-0142 7406130285 DAVID L PALM[N ~ OPP PL2 SHA~~CN AC L183 COMM MTG MTV: ~'.4?aa Slan~o,~ 99~a 02r '96 96 08543-0116 7700158289 D E KJELDGAARD'~ OPP PL2 8358 S100FT GF FID MST SAV io ~g ~oeus~ ~d • N210FT OF 51/2 EXC PLATTED PTN 18 1108 369 99>06 VT SAV EK 10 8 3693 5 OE543-0149 6176T6C JOHN C fv~RMA~ OPP PL2 SHANNON AC 1582 ADVANCE MTG CE MTG ~,oio ~~u~aKlk~ 8 546 08 1 70 08170 9~iivo OB543-0150 b1B416G C V SATI-ER✓ OPP Pl2 SHA~hCN AC L682 ADVANCE MTG CE M TG rJ.looc{ ~4~,o~y¢lv„~ 7/,~(, 8 546 0 8 1 69 03169 99 aaS MT+ 08543-~1~,1 ~~~r~ L1Q289 GARY 0 WALTER ✓ t~PP PL2 SNA~~C~ AC L782 LOMM MTG 44 ~~'.~1t0l~id i:.~ 9q~o~ 032844 C8543-0484 7900206110 WILLIAM F PGTTER~ GPPCRTUN[TY-NCCCIC HTS SEG PAG MT6 AC M TG C OR P <.QSaZ /VoRa• 8298; L2 81 E PT CF TK 298 GPPORTUNITY LYG S OF PSN 2 E N OF G POTTER NIL BET EXTD SICE LIKES OF l2 61 WOOLO ER WILLIAM F ~q~op 08543-0406 7961638 fRANK M MOGAN OPPORTUNITY B2S8 MOGAN (RANK 1 'N, ~ga~ Wocd Rµ{-~ 1~'1 PT TR LYG S OF PSH 2EN OFEBET EXTO SIDE LNS w77FT ll 41 WOOOIU N 1821 NGOD HTS SPOKANE WA FRANK M " 21 WL00FUFF RD ANE WA 99206 99?c~6 ~~~g~~~~7 ~~q~15p421 ~~T83iEwo d8-FS~oI-/ E123fTU0fTPTN OF9TR 298 LYG S OF PSH 2 HNY6N OF E123FT OF L1 B1 50007511 TG i I~ 511 ~9~~N000LG HTS FRANK M 08543-0408 7607120123 FkAt~K M MOGAh ✓ OPP WGODLO H75 8298 MOGAN FRANK W98FT L1 dl N 1821 NOUO SPOKANE wA 21 WOODRUFF RD ANE WA 99206 SUMM4RY DATA: INPUT CARDS PARCELS PRINT LINES 44 44 113 I . L E G U E 5 C k I P T 1 0 N L[ 5 M! H 13. 1 C oPUKANE COUNTY KEAI LAND FILE 1 13, 1980 ~~i ~ PARCEL OOCUNENT NUKBER NUMBER ASSESSED OWNER LE~AI OESGRIPT[ON CF PROPEkTY TAXPAYER kXPAYER 08544-C206 l15528G MET MTG 6 SEC OPPOkTUNITY N1/2 EXC EAU[iABLE SEL _ _ _ - / HWY 8266 200401797 ~E SEL V F97 08544-U207 115928C MEi MTV E SEC OPPORTUNITY SL/2 EXC SINCLAIR LANRE __.---------i7~~jr~y~j~.~l HWY 8266 N 2108 WUOORUF 1 LAWRENCE J WOODRUFF RD «'r SPOKANE NA w Y- a"- E WA 99206 08544-0208 610112A A G TR[NKLE OPPORTUNITY PT OF 6267 TRINKLE ALBERT ALBERT ✓ ~'+r•^'a~".=~~r ~*°~aA ✓j/ EXG BEG AT INT OF EL KITH NL OF PSH 2 TH N1o4Fi (H W133fT TH N 2021 FELTS R FELTS RD WA 99246 ~~~.~~~L 5162.7 FT TO NL Of HNY TU PUBGEXG HWY SPpKANE WA 08544-0203 521987C D4NIEL E3ROWN OPPORTUNITY SL/2 OF kOBERTS K 6 MO ~,~e,IS K,u,,,~f►ve., E200fT OF N360FT 8252 E !0410 DEAN 99~~ SPOKANE MA K & MONTEITH E 3 DEAN AVE WA 99206 08544-0201 7800194451 MAX D SPAlOING OPPORTUNITY EXG W36JFT SPALDIN6 MAX 0 M A X 0 GLESS HF1Y 9252 N 2609 PINES R SPOKANE NA PINES RD WA 99206 08544-0211 1128278 K l ASBURY ~ OPPORTUNITY W160FT OF PAC 1ST FEO SE 4, i ~1 w} ~~~/~,Sy;, @.rae„A~c,esR~J~ 8252 EXG N210FT E EXC HNY 13-L22694 1 FED S&L SPO X94 1 ~h~..~~~~~li~~ Ii~Yi~u:~ ~i.Rce~oCU.tS 4Yo!(. 08544-0216 77001487L6 R A B~NUGGELl1.~ OPPORTUNITY N346.2FT OF LINO MUT SAV BK C SAV BK 06 G~iCOD~ ~~lo~f~6+~~ ~q~GFT OF TR 253 EXC RDS 6 1 3291 8 ?1 B 0854M0217 7411010113 GUNNING BlOERS OPPORTUNITY E200FT OF SUNNING BUILDER BUILDERS INC 'sn,'"'u.°~8 ^t9~'y v*~.°::~!_~ TR 253 EXC N346.2FT Of E142fT G EXC N81fT Uf t123Fi OF N1/2 OF E 9616 MONTGOM MONTGOMERY AVE `t~d~203~ ~(6„~ 1~~dl~a~: TR 253 EXC RO SPOKANE WA WA 99206 08544-0215 7411010113 GUNNING tliDERS OPPORTUNITY M81fT OF LING MUT SAV BK F SAY BK 06 E223FT OP N1/2 OF TR 253 EXG RO 6 1 3908 7 )8 7 08544-0214 74IL010113 GUNNING BLDERS OPPORTUNITY N1/2 OF TR 253 uUNNING BUIlOER BUILDERS EXC E223FT 6 EXC RO E 9615 MONTGOM MONTGOMERY AVE SPOKANE WA WA 99206 ~Q.~S!t,4-i~,~,~ 74 1010113 6UNN[NG EIDERS OPPORTUNITY S1/2 Of Tk 253 LINO MUT SAV BK S AV BK 06 a`' EXC E200FT E EXG RO 6 1 3747 9 d: S. 5 ~ w ~ c ~ Y'J5 f7 9 9~~8041fi WILBUR TELFORD'S OPPORTUNITY 8297 GREEN GERALD 0 :-RALD D ~;p 4~~~ c'•9a.~`f C4r4~4v /I~t• f.EXG HWY NL/2 EXC S28FTGEXC 5T N 1830 WOODRUF WOODRUFF RD ~i9JOG SPOKANE NA WA 99206 08544-0301 2162258 G R OVEIRLAND OPPCkTUNITY NL/2 EXG DVERLANO G REUB C REUBEN V*o~ HNY 8296 N 1827 FELTS R FELTS RD py 8g~. SPOKANE WA WA 99206 08544-0320 611505EALLIED PROPERTIE OPP MISSION HIIIS 9296 PIERCE WILMA M d L MA M C~ aoo } ~~ic~: ft'Vt . ~ 1 B 1 E 10003 NORA A 4 NORA AVE ~9~oG SPOKANE WA WA 99216 08544-032L 4861190 D M A~BERTSON✓ UPP MISSION H(LLS 8296 FID MUT SAV 4K SAV BK ~oea ~ Iv~o~s, Y1~'~ • ~2 41 3 1003 28290 6 28290 6 V 99aoG 08544-0322 G5ST14H DONALO 5 THGMAS OPP M[SSIUN HiLL5 924c, SEC INTERMTN :RMTN L./oo~Sf~'~`+' ~~~6 B1 2.01-813633-0 1633-0 08544-0323 356333C MAURj(;t FLYNiV OPP MISSIVIy H1LLS 8296 CUL MT, ?7 109 KK r~~~~}, No".~ ~9,~oL L4 B1 L 46 427 109 K 08544-0387 857964A HALEI E KURD OPPORTUNITY W120~ CF N4 ti' RAINCER MTG MTG OF 51/2 6 w120' OF S28' OF N1/2 Jf BLK 297 398 5 113174 i. 1B 174 08544-0388 d57964A HAZEL E HURO OPPORTUNITY N120' OF N120' D[ERKS LARRY Of SL/2 OF E3LK 297' EXC N45' E 9905 NORA AV . ARRY NORA AVE DG SPOKANE WA WA 99206 08544-0374 857964A HAZEL E HURD OPPORTUNITY PT OF Li297 BANCSHARES NT6 kES MTG E90FT Of 1i210FT Of N300FT OF N1Z0.2FT OF SL/t ~ EyOFi uF W210FT 1503673 3 OF S28FT OF NL/2 08544-0375 857964A HAZEL E NURU OPPORTUNITY PT OF 8297 SPO MTG rJ~ 991R al~oR9 roc - E9QFT Of N300FT OF N120.2Fi OF S1/2 L E90FT ut w3~OFT Of S28Fi 0005542 OF NL/2 ~v~;. ✓ 08543-0102 854888 L ItEB~/ OPT PL2 51/2 15364 L[EB LEON L IN L WOODRUFF RD n C~~~~~IE~ iSi~i°J~~ EXG ST N 2205 NOODRUF SPOKANE WA WA 99206 08543-0168 7600145941 ROBT L TAYIOR'~ OPPORTUNITY PL 2 E116~ OF TAYLOR ROBERT L MBERT L N182.53~ OF NL/2 OF TR 364 E 8422 LACROSS LACROSSE AVE SPOKANE WA WA 99206 08543-0123 270112C~N R MILLER OPP Pl2 SH,iNNON AG L181 MILLER W R ✓ r R E 98L! SHANNON ~~nr~ SPOKANE NA SHANNON AVE WA 99206 085 3-0124 5b9612C NANCY OONLEY'~ OPP PL2 SHANNON AC L281 UONtEY NANCY N VANCY M E 9813 SHANNON SHANNON AVE SPOKANE NA WA 99206 085f3-0153 8000221550 P A HANTZ ~ OPP PLAT 2-SHANNON GIiY MTG SERVIC SERVICES ~ 98vc. k~t~X ~'~e- ACRES SUII N75FT OF L3 81 912892 1 i 1 C8543-0126 7607080355 L GAUDILL~ ~y~b aPP PL2 SHANNON AC L4B1 SPO MTG E. 97 ref ~E'.t~x f~v~' 0007173 3 `~9~~ 08543-0133 148023 L E WILLIAMSUN✓ OPP PL2 SHANNON AC NILLIAMSON IYAL ;ON LY AL E LL1 B1 E 9723 SHANNON SHANNON AVE SPOKANE NA WA 99206 08543-0162 7700156985 R08ERT MYLER OPP PL 2 SHANNON AC FID MUT SAV BK SAV ELK ggEj ynw,wn, ~~~LOTS 12-13 81 3 1003 28125 4 28125 4 08543-0136 7700166342 NANCY MAE OONLEY~' OPP PL2 SHANNON AG LINO MUT SAV BK SAV BK 06 4, ry113 5~4^^ ^ y9~~14 B1 6 1 4012 5 l2 5 r SAV BK ~,4 0137 283214C M R~MILLER ✓ OPP PLL SHANNON AC LINO MUT SAV BK 6 g O1 0101450 )1450 ~,i 1~~~~ ~I~y.~i~ ~=•99a~ ,~tnnoi., U5 81 f? 08543-0138 9283028 FRED 8 H10DEN ~ OPP PL2 SHANNON AC LLB2 H[OOEN fREO B :RED B ~J N 6906 STANllAR STANDARD ST SPOKANE NA WA 99208 'ERN S&L 0~!s8543~-°0f13p9 ~^760y~,1~ Q475,~MAXINE E NA MAU OPP PL2 SHANNON 4L L282 ~Rt MESTERN SEL 0 0142 . YYbY.,~ 6 8~l~$0~ ~~"~~~'a., l~•~°;S u/~~~e4f~ gg~D(~ 008 5810 0142 08543-0140 7700170437 CH4S L 80EVING ~ OPP PL2 SHANNGN AC L3 E2 OUEVING CHARLES CHARLES L E 9808 SHANNON SHANNON AVE SPOKANE WA WA 99206 FED SEL SPO 08543-0141 5817866 L E ZIEGLER~ OPP Pl2 SHANNCIN AC L482 PAC l~T FEO SEL .14 G.98~} 5~(.e..n.•.l~~P- Q~lot, 13-120114 6 I 08543-4L42 7406130285 DAVID L PALMEN'~ UPP Pl2 SHANNON AC X183 l.Ui~iM r17G E• `1Q1~ 'J,(a~J~,~ r?x~G r 029' 08543-0116 !700158289 U E KJELOGAARU ~ OPP Pl2 8354 S1J~FT OF FID MUT SAV BK SAV BK ,~1.a<>>9 ~~~„•~y,rd- N210FT OF S1/2 EXC PLATTED PTN 16 LL08 3693 9~.nt> 9 3693 5 09543-0149 6176766 JU~iN G NURMAN ~ UPP PL2 SHANNGN AC 1582 ADVANCE MTG MTG LTO JJ. a~ ~e ~.~de~la~d kd ' i4x~G 854608170 08543-0150 6184166 C P SATHER'~ OPP Pl2 SHANNON AC L6 E2 ADVANCE MTG MTG ~J.,.,~y 5~,,,~Q~i~,~ ~q,~ 854608169 L69 0854(37e-0151 7605110289 GARY D kALTER ✓ OPP PL2 SHANNON AC L7E2 GOMM MTG ~~N'6~~~1~~ ~&`d1~L~Id- aOn1 Wo~~~Ki4 u~~ ~.o.~10G 032844 08543-0464 7900206110 WlL~1AM F POTTER ✓ OPPORTUNITY-W00D10 HTS SEC PAC MTG CO G 480 ~ /CRY 8298; L2 BL L PT OF TR 29d OPPORTUNITY lY~ ~ VF PAN 2 G N OF E POTTER MILLIA BET EXTO SLOE 11NE5 OF L2 BL WOOLO MTG CORP WILLIAM F 08543-0406 7961638 FRANK M MOGAN OPPORTUNITY 8298 WOGAN FRANK M PT TR LYG S OF PSH 2EN OFEBET EXTO $I OE lNS w77FT LL el WOODED N 1821 NOODRUF LANK M 9--' WOODRUFF Rte WA 99206 HTS SPOKANE MA F 08543-0407 7700150421 STEPHEN R BFA S ✓ UPPORTUN[TY ts298 SPO MT6 .1)'/~///~E123FT OF PTN OF TR 298 LYG S OF PSH 2 HciYGN uF E1~3fT OP ll SL 0007511 t~:: ~~~.~'ir ~G~ / WOODED HiS ca 08543-0408 7607120123 (RANK M NOGAN'~ OPP NODDED MTS 8298 MOGAN FRANK M TANK M WOODRUFF RO N98FT LL BL N 1821 NOODRUF SPOKANE WA WA 99236 SUMMARY OA TA: INPUT CARDS PARCELS PRINT LINES 44 44 113 4 . 1 C - _ . - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ZONE/PUD RECLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST C©ntact:i File PART I ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP ASSES OR'S SECTION MAP, (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary ou ownership) `rl~) ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION, (F o r m A) ZONING WORKSHEET l/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PLOT PLANS (5)-7 SIGN PLAN LANDSCAPE PLANS (5) GRAPHICS PACKET SLIDES (minimum size film 12+6) (date) APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER - TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS (data PARI Ii COUNTY AGENCIES NOTIFIED NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPED (date) ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT date STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST STAFF" ANALYSIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING (A Sign - 4x4) (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) (date) ANALYSIS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) A HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) S EPA's Notice of -Action BONDING (Landscape) ACCEPTED (date) RETURNED (date) ~~,w.. ,_...,r ~ _ I 4 Y a r. x ' ~ rv Kw~ ~ e y'~, r ' ~~„„"y r. y 'n.M w ~ ti ~ M ,w ~ 3 ~ x r x... x C $ x S~ '.W T x \ x Y . ~ ~ ~ y.. P, . .s. ~ ' ~ ~ ~ i ( t ~ n. e. 8 ri.'. .a. r!.~.: e H. (k ~ ~~6 ~ ~ ~ . I . x. a- ' J I J _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ b, I ~ r t t s ;gin. , , . , . , , .r . : ~ , . , s: s _ _ _ ~ _ _ s „a t, 5 g~ a e ~ ~ ~ •,v"^.. i ~ . ~ s > t..'E.'~ ' ~ ~ ~ k ~ .a % a H 4 p ~ S d p~ d `A .........u «..»...«..«....i.. ..«......w... i.... . .»w... . ............n.. ~ .a. m.w ~.~w w.e+.+.w-.w a r.....w. Y ° t [ f ta' ~ ~ k - h, ~ k:: F t ~ . 1 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ <.eb~ x ' ~ ~ t~ ~ i a ~ ~ ~ °m i ' ~ ,mow::.. .....:.:rrac«w.ra.:.:.:.....:~::~:o-.,:..,• ~ .::~...M p ~ ~ J , I i _ , - - t t - ~ ~ • J I l f ' A~ . r. e ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ x t ~ { ~.__...__.M..~, m sG~ ro rA ~ 9 ..„„.n k t 1 i 1 1 ! . ~ ' ~ µ ~ a mnn. n ~ rmr......:. r....; a.....aM++........ s ww «.mw-». ~ xrw~n. P gg a g 1 ~ L 1 3 ..._.__..9 t, ~ i z 3 _._.m_ d ~ m a..,n,.n.. ..m. A w i~ a L" 6 k4 ~~1 •,p,,,,y.' Mr q $ { ~ i i ¢M* , .y 'y. 1 gq ~~s. Y ^ p ~ Fy 4., p y.~ I A ;dp m . ®e o ~ ~ ~ ~ i xv®. ° i i w.W.~.~..r.._.., r re 'S a> r a } ~ s a '3' g . is ? E , , q , , i ' ~ w ~ .M ~ ~ ~ E d r ti~t t nnm~i, r."...v.. a r ~ 8 w l:.. 7': ~ g. ~w a r a ~ ~ 1 L 4 t BB. d ~ p. ~ i .e.....:. 9.a.,«.., roe....... s b gyp......... 8 A«. a, y ..'t) ffi 9 ~ 4 ~ 9., a b r w a ',p e ~ t ~ 4 } 9 1 p 9 ~ s. 'i iiggyy gg t~Ftl ~ Z. re d a x ce g a r. a.~.,~~.xro.. ....,:.,wan..: I~ °n., bra x ; „ , - - - - - - - - - - - - S 0 R a cl, 8 " - - - - - - - - - t , a ; ~ , ~ ~ - " ~ ~ ~ d i i , ~ ~ ~ _ d c 7.. a ~,s , ~ x ~ J a.., 4 ~ J~ f ~.s'°.. ~ 9 i; fl , a 8 v 3 ~ . , ~ b ~q, , . ~Y I ~ f. m M ~ .R _ ~.7 ,w,, ~ ~ E e,.., li ~ „r P,~.. ..tea y.,....:. . n ~ , ~ S ~ t, ~ . ~ e:+. I µ x 3. P ~ ~ r~. ' < ~w e„ ~ (1"~ q S "'~4. ~ w g g - i ~ B , ~ r. d ~a ti. ~ . . . w f M»'"""• ~ I ~ t x~ 8 ~.,+i ~ ~ ~ , ` - .d w )a } ' " a'; ~ ~ ~ E' g' ~ i { „....w ar.... ..M µ ~.x I p E.... A 4 3., 4 ~ w, d ,w. i ~ b F' 3 .ry z~. 3 r ~ ~ ~ ,.fie, .,q . s' i t#» ~ ~ e, y p wa..,, y #r✓? . ~r. 0 y a ~ i as u .M a i ~ q t ti.. k a * , µ Q ~ a ~v n. ' n a ~ x - ~(1 I{ifl tats td ,a nn art+e ~ ss~ c IT MUM 'T T, T je- 4 dt ^ a A . ~ ~ ~ yd d~ f" jj((}} .~.F~} . Y ~ a a ~ P ` g. g . x~. x' . _ _ z 3 ~ } ~ ~ 3 ~ -4 ti p A ~ ° x- r ' f'~. i 1, ~ @ € . e: -~e. K ~ ~ t ~ 6;.~ ~ ~ r.":: ~d ~ _ F y..-,., ww.-v .m ¢ F x y~ ~ ~ ..E ~ +9 E i d i ~ a 1 :a . [y.,..• n 1. 4 t ' k. ~ a ~ i € ~ ~ m ~^^.~......~r*pg.,^.... ...y::w. max. b , i E, ~ e~. x a ~'s „......,„,~„y,,,.,„.....,........, F. % a ` f ~ ~a 1 Iap i< §'y ~ ~ v r.. ~ . . ~5.. { ~ - i . ~ ~ ~ re x i a . g v.~ . o. a ~ 1~:a' s• .A . v. r ' ..q- ~ w ~ d F r . ~ .......g..... ,i x.... f 4 f " ~ . t 3:. e - 5 .M i E. ri,u:,.. x p & a¢ . ( r c ~ y 4 s. •rn .s.....s... . x..~ a ~ S ai ~ . y. i ~ ! C ~ x.„. n F ~ a., . ~ ian,, ~ ~ ~ , .q.... , > , , ii r , d a ~ , ~ . A ~ M , , ~ ,f> ~ ~ . ..q,_ . k. E: a z w ~ ~ , a. , _ . , ~ , , i f ~ ~ ~ is ~ ...g w ~ r rr n.. Y w y Yp ' l ~ P ~ nn ea e, tn,a ~ ve wa ,.m .ffi i_ : w ,,.,.:a4.y... P.'. WON! -11" Er- 0 U Y l N r t:: s. ism, ti2Y -ion 8. a.,,:.:,:.. R4 F A 1% " a Ill 112T3 ~ , t pt, ~a~ f k++.. r ......mss ~ e Po ~ a ~~,.r~ -,„,,,x... ~ . i ~ r b g ~ F ~ 4'` 4° i I i t ~ ; , ~ ~ 4 ~,:,Y:. F n t: I 's 'v .?E „1 #1 f\t f.. ` I i i _ I ~ ~ ~.~.s j C u 1 1 t . t `I F 4: , , t - # ~.a- f (3 g ..3 Sa ~1 3 3 ~ 3 r« r e f .,p'' e < ; ti `a. § ~z:' f >.'}x~, 4 ~ r r...j ~ i .S 6 $ I r,r 7 ~ r n r 8 ; g ;'d nTM S r ~ ~ ~ ,4 ~ % * ~ ~s,.~„ t:; s.: ~ ~(~6ii a ~ c ,j~;, r.. & ~ . x,, ..ter. k x~..~.. Y ~ r. _ ~ , ~ ~ p ~9 fl 4 : ~ , , S ,,.;q~ r r: i a ~ € l .i, i. i ~9 m - i ~ e 1 ~ , ce „e ~ ~ , & ~ ~ s ~ z, ~ ~ ~ r.. . t { ~ ~ r t. ~ e~ 4 C . EI ~ & & d Y y F . ' gg ~ n-. 4, M, ~ ,1~(,~ , +'§i;{'. x ,~biPy ~ ~ y z ~ p_. i . , F,. E7 ~F~-: . . , ~'e ~ ' (j ~ e i;, r >'v~:i t~:. j <~~XP. a.Y&~ N ,.:mow. . ~ ~ ~ ~ E ' .po'i'..... ' F < > c ~ ~ ....rte (~d:}~ s gyp: ~ p v~ z'+g~' .rte "';j:.:~: ~ . . ~ ~ , ~ 3 a~ ~ a..E. Fb } I i ~..wxn+«i .ro-vw-`:. .a..,W 5....4MS 3 ~ ~ yr«swev- r.. f/ q & i. ~ i ~ ~ t. E r ~°3 n,.,« t. a q ~ l B ~ F q(: ~ I P g ~ . a M.. ~ " p n li~".. r..., r.~„ ' ,,3, . 8 . ~ .M.. > € pro.... . s g m m ~ ` ' ~f i KE ,E S R. Gf AP H 1. C` N T Y S It P O.J A N lie C 0 U k..: - R 4 All. E; , ' i a t d,Mal d -ry Ca A tot'! c:t w, ;e lY' ?E. sy: Via. r. - ~ ~ b:, . . : ~ ; _ Y: 8r~a ~ ~ ~ .'ce ~ ~ a &~~B~a ~ n . w' ~ $ ''g 'fir i., i y ~ ~ b i ~ IL. ~ is x` a :d :.,"r Ts~ v :,y, z ~ ra P' ~ ' ' ,air;, `d y . ~ 'yi . ~ s? € LL4"' a i .tGi a ~ , p° ~ S I i , p s .I 'v. r ~ $ ~ a ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ et e v~ y~ +l p... ~.s . r " S ~ % t " is ~ ~ rte,, '..,Y ~ ~ nppF ~4~...~ nd. ',ad g ~k,'r 9' p..., a" p~~ I ~ p fix, y,a~ a 4 A a .~d. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ b. B' ' ' _ _ _ _ _ it i.. i>,. j, ~3. >3a ~y s.~ rY'~ ~p < tN k ~ «'i. 5 ~ r:. xxxr. r.. ~ f^# R: .b ?M t 3..~~..':. rd a.. ~i3«.?M l ♦ r. r: ~ ~ i'. 4.~ ? i.« 3Ai..1~ & 1 ~t ~ggg Z%8'+.& t r. }3 . ~ pSp i 2'~ d d ~ »M. ~3. ~it~t. 3~ :n~+; } ay ' ~:3 ~,3. ' 33 3 d~'~~ ' tj }u., 3 3•n:~i. g`.,• - P p' m ' 9'y ' a. I 7 i i to { A ~ ~y I ~ ° < ~ ~ ~P f^ ~r tt { j ~ 1 ~ N ~ r ~ N. t ,i R V 4 ;r' a ~ a. za, ~ ii ` a3:a r; a a:S', 9 5 t ' ~3, a1a ;;ti' ft P b' a-: a 1 .3 4.... y'.,; , , ,d i _ . - f q•i . n a ~ t li' N 3 i „ 4 ~ 7 r i~. t. hW' i... .,va, .s; ~r:.«. ~~«.aa... ,..a v.!. f~'F,.w.~a'Y!~, .i3.,t. ~;s ~..,~;~:.r~.~...3§~,i....,.a~a.. 3:~,A~'a; ~a.«~... ~.«:~,~a~ af3a~.;: a~a~~a„».~:. '~v,?,.'~~a~"~:. :?',a,~a.. a~..a~,.. k. a„ . ~~8~ ~x„• F. d}}•; :c ..-..x.. i i , a~ n i~ ~ 4. 4 i i tr . i r i r: , ~ ~ a''' i. 9. j r~~«} ~tt"T~~. a~~a~ ~ . < ~ > ~3„v.''+i rt. z, • w t:: s , a~... ~ z 3 i.:' i { A. !k.. a ~ ~ . » . i ...tea ~ r~3..` i~~~ ~ ~ i i' 3 ~ 3a i yy ,i a T'`+y. ~ v a.~.. fat ~ c, s~~ s ~ . r: ~~A s.. P'. R X s ~ ~ r.a^. 't.. r~x. z a, 3 ly at r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ € ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ £ a ~ g .a. `RZ. rig ~ a: 'A:€, a x ~s.. s ~ t, ~ ~ =~e a' r y x ~ a . . .a ~ E R x ~ ~ a ~ ~ i ~ # ~,a: x.. E .b ~ ~ .a. i j.:, z.. j ~ j" P ~ .A ~ x - . ~ ~ p....... ~ , ( Y.. ~ . j,> l'2 ~ $ < ( Viz. ~ , . ' u.... f ~ ~ ~M........ ~w _ ~ ~.`e.. ~g o f , . E E E . .k~yh..~r . , . ''~..~q . y h' Y J. .f &; % 5 . k ...'y r c.~ .n ~ ~ d & ~ ~ .,N ~ .~y^ y. .may * ~ \ ~ E ~ ~ n. ....h •a1 ~..i g:.~.~..... a. : x........ M' a . A g.. i y ~ ~ f.. ~.i • ~ '.w d to .1'1~✓ '(X`. . ~ i ~ , ~ a z ~ . ~ .fir v=. , , ~ ' ( i...d. d i. a ro ~.i ffi . Y y. e. µ ~ ti; : x ~ ~ ~ . 3~ y t ~ e::. a : ~.a, < ' ~ ~~.?i„a~ 3~. c. ~.9 a~, , n „ -re . ~ x a~. p„~ ~''a &a~sx~ ` ,i'' ~v l~"' 3 ~ G ~e~5r,"s J ~vs" d 1 .w . ,g 'ra, ~ . t ~ '„~q~u i :lost ' 'r'b~~. s'..R.2~ ' i ' " k m ~ ~ i . 5 p ~ Dy~; a .max. ~~i' I a - t~ e _y, ~i , ;,~G S' ,,gf^ ~ ~ ~ , s^, " ' r y°"°~ e. y €P w y ~ ~ 6 E . ',j 9 d,~ pp~¢ ~~4'. ~ ~ ' ;~e I ..AY...➢ ~ r Y' ~ 8.v 4 ~ ~ Y x ~ . ~ a . a a ~a ' ~ ~ y r ~ i 'i Vq ~ E" ~reg ~ t' ...::ate . Y c ~ ..5. r p ;.y ~ r „g' w. y„. x} aR a ~ ~ . t k d r. ~ ~ 1 ~a r.. A ' E'. d~ ~ ~p. Y '.d v r ~ 6 a r ~ t ' S ...y«.. ~ ~ ~ r~ i 1 w ....A ~a, .ice: ~ it • Rip x 6 ~ gib. ~ ~~,~F , s ~a,~-~3. ~_.Y SY ~ :84~~, ~',s kr~~,3 % t q ~ . . a ~ ~ ,y # gg ,Ct: 'k ~ ~z ~"r . c' ~~p`' ^p3[Y ~ . s„ % ~ ~ k ~ b 0. , ~ , 3: ° f X` 5. a ~ ~ ~ t ~..Y~~•' ~~.fi y~. :k~~~ hi ti. ~~~~a?~'~~~ yp~-p ,~,ri ;X ~B..: ~..ar.. wwz w.wa..... or p~.., g °8 € ~ ~ ~ , b ~ ~ n $ I . ~ ~ . r. ...^.::^.^mwh.: &!W%ar.:a.~..vm.~N'.. t✓.^.'.r~Rw.MJM• p... s..:~ .w....:. s«w^.wmw+++.t4...~m.:' w. I':~ ~ ~ ~ , k xi, ~ ~ . y, ~ ~ r i x I , a. ®~.°p 6 ' ~ ^A.~ d, ti ~ @' A ~ fi ~ p ~ h8 ~ " F 'i ~ r ` ~ ~ :a :r ~ f ~ r d k a...,''. .Y ~ ~ 3 . 5 n g~ ~~E° y `C . x,,...~ ~ d ,.i ~ q'.. 3 X ~ t ' ~.~a ~M~' a e l~br 9 9 Y'om'"~ . K' .0.4''; f E. ~f ..~ti"' , ~ e -jf~ 'a' . . ,._.w r _ a dd ® ' ,x zP r , ~ ~ ' .R y.... di ' :i f ' ~ ~ ~ t r @'. f f v. ~ ~ 8~. X$ i n K ' •'W / ~ 4 S9i re~C ~ r ~ ~ ~ °;.h r ' ...2 b . w ,q A ~ p, ~R y ~ D ' E~Y ~ { ~ 0. ' ~ Y Y t' i w / i r t a ~ i~ .~a:.. w A. „iea' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m+.\ ~...1, fir.. 9 , ~ `b ' ~ ~ A„ ~d ~...e~ p~' t"M. a~ p p C ~y~ .f' C,' . 'fie e rF ~ ~ RZ p ?r f' P i ~r ~ K 4: 4., ,•.?fix ~ 4 ,i% i . I a 8A 'Lw 'w., "w, . q 5 a $ ; ° p. ~ ~ 'y~& x , <.b" °r z.`i..€ ~«s.p.. r', .t..n.. c, ,f is . 8 ~,W~ " q",' ~s? ~ .....M..m„,.„:~.::.woa. a r s py ' ' ; ~ "R ,il ~ d ` ~wa'. .a.m~~~.wwa~...wf.a.wsa.~...mm.a...~«.o ' n. A°~ .o, ^p ...-~.g r , .f k ~ k 'w t tE n w . .~»...w w... M r~ std x ~ Y ~ q„a W.. ~ . tip, , t ~ gas i'te.;F6 { ` @,~^ ~r - - a+a~~ t" . ° "w:. ~ 5 .w. y s~' a~ m' ~ .r~ ~ a•~ { ` . , ~ ~ . , s,, g ~ x a, - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e. - k 1w r m. 6 ~ ~m s. i. r,. . , . ~ ~ °~rx;^sSaraaa a a wax" d., ,M ,y ~w a - ~ I~ W ~ ~ S q « k~ ~ x. p ~ A, a f 'i.p 1, ~ ~.~r Y yP ~ "Z ~ l". . o-. ~ . 1 r E~ y q ~ r~M, r~ ~ kd °'k~ . . ~w a ~ : ;t;i . . << s ' e,, „w i '.»a.si9~aaa .far"w,y6': > '.,'s d~a'.~ aP Ft ys ~n~ .gym ~~f, , Y',Ak 0.<.',,°ro4~'e. C • ~@':': k. "Fwrn^'s.n av'" ~ ~ ' k f''.. ;)gp~gA.~ `'i'$Y .17d✓ts., ~.::tr~iLr'. B a 'R r. ~ 'aa. ~ r v q 0 .per S ~ , ~ ' a nf~a; ' ~ c~a m sF . e'~wSw •~K A. . n „.p s ~ a n. M 9 ~ y~ g d: .w ~~~y » „ k. x. ~ / ,'-y m m 6 ~ ~ ~ g~ a~ ° f~F~ , e; ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ sum A k 3 ~w.w._ . ~ ~ :..F~~. mw. , n,~.,, . .,.J. ...,M s 9 ~ '~O> ~ t ~w~ ? ~ ~a " F t t r t ~ ~ a x I ~ 1 I ~ ` ; , u~' a ~ r . 8 i s i ~ i g a W # 111 ! m. r ~ i ~ r; g F , ~ ♦ 3 1 E Mj . &;Ary , MN,.,. { Ka°' , ° r a a I M.~ . ; <; r m.... ~ t ~ ~ I 1 i ~ W ~ ~ ~'g ~ p ~d ¢ i a 1 s 1 N T PROPER TY I C P X . ~ OWNERSHIP f ~ ~ Rr t1 } -1 ING { a ® z ~ m j 3 3 ~ ~ C-n ~ t ~ 1 .a . 8 mw ~ p ° p d I ~ m 1 ~ ~ i 8 'p ~ ' S I i . µ x t i C m f ' : . f ~ i ,mow : „ rvev ~;,a~. ,a ,r HAT s T, r,. a ;r x s j a ~ i $ erg. ~ " s ~ t a ~ i~ i ` i~ 1 s I t 7 i I 4 P-4 t E fl ~ n~ a I ~w 1 ~ _ ' i', . , ~ ~ i . ~ e im, ..._._v _ _r t.._ $ . - JOB NUMOM- 99730 , DI) 110 0 12, _ 9 9 a i g M " M B r s A ",r x y i J ~ ~ ~ r.. ~ ~'F,~%' .~T J~ ~.A.' ..9.. ~ ~ yr„ i~a .v.~",.. .ate; ~ ti' 3 ~ w ~ _ ; _ s , ~ "M ~ _ . _ < ®g " ~ _ r .m r f'~ E g .w.... _ ',t ~ 4 „P° } ~ ~ A ; ~ " y,. , ~ 3 's~, ' ~ ~ ;w 8 i _ i ¢ i~ ~ , _..mm m... ~ w.. „""."".."..."""w m ~ ,s ' { a ~ ~ ~ K . ~ ' ° ~ S x u r' ; ' ~ 2. t b ' ..:a° d.. „ F , a , -r " , ~ ~ , i 1 1 . a, a~~ E " N s t1~: ~ ~ ~ b„ CS ~ ~ ....y A ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ati , .x':: ~ " w ~ ~ . . • " s ,q~ M 3 , _ " , 3 f „p " p ~ f s , , " " s ~ , ~ " „ ~ a ~ M ; , a c; i ~ ' +y ~ " " o ~ 8 " p " , r. ~~ry i 3 f :w 49 ..rv^" d E " w 6 ~ ~ is-..,. f,~ n.:w+.,~ , e...d 4 , : n a ~ .,J '„..„,y a p X :nw. +q , ~ w. .a , s fi q „ w s °a u 4 , , " n d g~ «N .,t ~ m.« } ` fit- ~ ~ . a " . ~i } ~ o , ~ Y"•.~ ~.^t i " , " .~.,v X r " B$ ~ " R ~ tit x~ ~ ~ v a _ ~ ~ u,.v.. p""""."".""~ " r ~ ~ " " ..m~, r „ ~ e ~ a : w. ~ l.. ~ eta .a ; e "Y ~ r~~. „ y, ~ _ s` , - ar ~'~n ~ 1 "~N .r ~ } , " , ~ ~ ~ ~ _ it ~ ~ " ,.,„k i~ F i . , ~ ~ : ~ e W.. P ~ }y " ems, " ~ ~ '.r.d 0.A¢ "M Y .m ~~..,7»- " '2." rp ; ~^~y.. "fir 1 ' . 9 ~ " ~ ~ ~ , ~ ~ a,; w 7 « ~ " « e w.~,.., ~ , . , >,p " r qb , s. » `^m. w ~x ti a - a , P 8 .i. n ~ > > r. r . ~ ~ µ ~ ~ 9 ~5 ~ r•.~y ' ~ S w J4 ~ ~ A. A < , ~9~ ~6'., y' .F ~ ~ ~ ~gg. am F 8 ~ d . jj d°"""~ R µ w ~ " yf r" r . - a m„ ~ t x ~ ~ : a r ~ w _...w ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~ x~ ~ ~ ~ t , ~ . ~ y,. , ~ ~ i ~y AL.. ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ ~ , ~ ~ m 8 ~ - µ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l .m ~ ~ ~ .p. - y I ~ { ~ ~ it "x ~g ' E , ~ ~ ` 42 ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ®w.. m~ a ( d~ . i,' ~r,:, M u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c i ~ ~ ~ o ~_M ~ y ~ ~ x E ~ n r E { ~ ~ ~ it KK.., g "Y ~ ~ ~ ~ " ' .P i „ , ~ y s~ ~ ~ * t. ~ ` $ A., ~ A. ,~.......x.... ~ F$ b~` ~ ~ ~ ~ »t - } / ,N~ ~ P ~ a n 8 ~ ~ ~ a ~m' ~ i y n r " ~ d otl s~ ~ ~ ~ s° ~a~ ~ r :T, ~ . w . { ` s s~ Sze. ~ E ~ ~ ' ~ a ~ ~ a ~ ~ c .3 , d i ~ . 7 r a.. m ...m. w t°'. ~ 6 ' ~ ~ M e wd ~ ~ A r> A m . ~q" , ~ ~ t R ~ s a 6 , g ~ , 44 ~ «a. , . ^ w bw . E w. _ ''1", ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ { I rj J ~w'Y i r"°x d 1 9 . ~ J.. n B S N ° ~ ~ ~ d s~ ~ s :any k k « -~-w ...~....p p,. n \ g t' ~ / ~ ~ a i *a w " r ~ ~ s 9 ~ ~ . yy ~ c s< 8 d? + ~ ~ ~ r ¢ 6» y i 6 r ,A %w~ o ~ w„ r r e ~a ~ w ~ . , ~ ~ - # s ~ ~ a r„„w „ ~ ~ f a t ~ ~ w ~ G ~ ~ 'p ~ ~ ~.7 ~ ~ w . ~ ~ ~ ' 9 p w. ~ ; ; d . ~ w , w „ • ~ ~ ~ { ^t a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~G ~ ~ s ~ ' u. . t.,'' } gym. ® `fly.. ~ n,, . s'° Vin., 0. ~ ~ a„ ~ , x ~ , ~Y ~ ~ a , . sue. _ _ l ~ ~ f ~ ~ p. ~ ~ I . 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ w , , n ~ ~ ._w . ~ ~ ; µ ~a . s w.,.... ~ ~ ' r~ q " " ~a d d d~ sit /k« „a ~ s. ~,x ~ 1 . 6. R r as N .w.q ~ 9 ~ ~ t w. x g r ; p G E i ~a : ~ ~ s' w } $ & ~ ~ t p E n w b s A a. y r _ ~ r ~ ~ i s ~ ~ w m ._.~-mow.., . b i~...... 33 i «wros } s ~ . wm, i. - I 6 aB «w.. . 1 I ~ t _S ' ~ ~ ~ ¢ ~ ~ - ¢g i a ~ ~ - - S 6 a E ,3 i _ k~ \ y i I. - ~ 3 ~ i e+" 1 k ~ ~ a ~4 ~ ~ 1 i 1 ~ fi $ s , i 4 ~t s i s ~ l eg R R F ~ . a..m a.. b I E L P°t ~ 3 .e I. " # i i , i e~ . 4 ~ ro. I t t k i I I t ~ r m B i ~ y 1 ~ ~ ~ t v. E ~~~HM ~ , ~ i E ~ ~ m. ~ ,m i i ~ ' I i .rte. _'_°~....,~.e,. _ I r 3 1 - ~ 'a r 1 3 ' .,r ' 3 ~ ` ~ E I . } `^°.a v I d ~ m c i i i i I r { I t t 4 k f ~ ff a ~ zp _ I i M . _ ~ ~ i ~ ro u - $ a ~ a 3 w r t; ry ~ 9 w rv 4R 8 t. g r b - r 3 i 3 Q j ~ ~ 3 C ~ I ' ~ ` fr h r r i ti ~ ! a r ~ ' , ~ ~ ~J f 8•, ( lF n ~ ~y t i f o ~ a.7 P ~ g r k g ~ t M ~ { ~ , , ~ ~ ' a i l g j , # fi.. > u. 3 B ~ t i w ~ p~ ~ E, p 0. t a _ _ i l ,.A e _ ~ # ~ # d - e b , SS I a 1 I ~ I I I ~ ~ a L.. j p a ~~w ~ ~ p ~ 0 1 1. i N, A; t C ' 7 o m' I 1 7 r # i - N i u... a a ~ a s 9 R - ~ P e, ¢ ~ ~ } r ~ ~ 1 i i ~ a C A~~.~ k ® q p i .®s j j i [ E .j. i E j 1 y - ~ 8 ~ A®. a i ~ c r ~ ..e_.... a 4 I l i .m.d P S 4 d Y ~q C i w ~ i j ` C ~ g gg y C E i ~E~ E I ~ E 3 ( p C q 3 a 3 jqj 'ac.:~-:.~. Y... E h ' 1 F E p d ~ ~ . ~ i, . f ; E ~ { ~ } ~ € f H ~ ~ l : ~ ' 3 9 f .t~ i 'k vv ~ ' d g~ ~ l 9 € 9 p p 8 i P { f fl € * ; { I 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ f I ~ P ~ ` ~ € , a ~ ~ s _ < < p ~ r B ~ t ~ ~ € ~ f ,pj i:.i `a ~ § E t. ~ f f ..,`i { € b ~ ~ ° ~ 1 i ~ sj` i; ~ i i)! h ~ , ? ti ~ i I § ~ € ~ ;E ' ~ IP # C j 3a p~ ~ ~ ' 3 ~ f....,.....~..~.....m.(.~., . n ~ 1 p ~ Y y..: > i \ 1 ES \ \ f~... ~ ~ ~ 7 p ~ 3t E a i.._._.. 3; S7 ~ 4.-" .ay 1 t } f ~ ~f ~ f } £f i ~ } << I ~ ~4 ~ ' €3 C__~ . l; 4~,~ .....m. ..era, A 1 . . ~ ` ~ s i ; ~ ~ R g f € -.4...-. 7 € ~ `f' ~ ~ ~ `'a P P •w ro , ~ E ~ g...~ ~ ~ 1 ~Y ~ ~ 'k ~ f € } r~ 1 I ~ r P ~ a ~......_,~-m.....~ ...~...a ~ NR ~ ~ a ~ ~ } 1,,.~...,..,,,..., ~ ,i'"" 1 ~......M_~..M ..~,.,~,..,~...M 1 I ....x. i k i; _ n:. ~ f m f t,, S a a k S' . ~ ...m_}. j. } 4 ``~,e,~ ra . Hn s 1 k . _ _ _ I 5. w,~° w ;a W. ry a .,~a k' t w.,. ~ B ~ X y ti f' a ~ 'Fdh i d } .w' ~WS+ i 0. fi:"". ^xM1'P ty x r' s... w;'.; u r.'r ~ ~ i i t ..W.;.~. i A w '..K .y ..A: o a y p,' B i ...s.. y„„a. , „.....,w~ y. r S M ! MJ. ~ by w". ,a, , sw $ ~ ~ "°M"' x p. . - e., „.o ~ v. .h i« »73' ; M.,.. y y^ 55. .°,B .s tip.....»• y: H~ a.. r:n..~ 7 s 8 r~ w~"' ~4t. r.. .:x ~ ;.tip: ti K y. " F' ~~,.,p a } r ~ t• h P i~ . ' y:', ~ . p uti d t ~ i v. ~.N q d. Y S i:, ~ 8 ~p. ~ y Y^. x~, i ~ ...d.. .u f,".» . } ~ V " ~ •,,y.. ~Y ~ a `:..!:s