Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-144-79
e+r 1 SPOKANE COUNTY 'PLANNING DEPARTMENT 00 Zone Reclassification Checklist AUplicant's Name Address telephone No, Applicant's •,a,ij,g 5 goo=k 42 6~ 3rd 6Z~/-9131 7-15 -iyg--79 INITIALS PRE-APPLICATION FEE, ($10.00), RECEIPT NUMBER (date) APPLICATION APPOINTMENT (date) (time) PART _j ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP. ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership) ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION. L ZONING WORKSHEET. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. PLOT PLANS (5 blackline) - (setbaoks, read frontage, square footage, epen space). PLOT PLAN TO GRAPHICS 5z (ate) f~ PHOTOS (8 x 10 and description) SIGNS (4' x 4') APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER 2.4 I v. date TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS PART II NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPES, ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT (date) y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FINDINGS PREPARED ~ (date) POST SURROUNDING AREA R (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED (date) MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) FINDINGS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PART III 0 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED 9'~~~94DENIED CONTINUED MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) SEPA's Notice of Action File # -4 'OV- 7 9 Sec. T'sh'P ds R'ge Classification , S ; OFr/C1= Proponent -~U.cJtS y0 Wi<.. t It I'll t L) ~ ~ '11 T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I NAT I O N Proposed DECLARATION OF Nonsignificance (proposed/final) (significance/non-significance) 1. Description of Proposal: F&=j GC $ uI LD~•tJG- - (ASP- 04' AFX1_5rfAJ6- ~~s/n~.c~7ia ~ ~ uc ~ ~ • aSS~c~e~s 2. Proponent: ydiizJk::~, 3. Contact Person: "CV-4m a Phone: 6a V--f/3 / 4. County Action(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Other: ' 5. Location of Proposal: ,[Jpt.wcs T.VG,e✓ d~ vv i v s 17-Y AA-0 C &S0,e0 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to -,1001 have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is A.)b7 ' required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name Fred L. Dayharsh Name - A-7,41A4CG Signature z,~ Ag.,l Signature i~~~?i'/~~~~I2-~~ Tale Director Title Chairman Hearing Examiner Comm. Department County Planning Department County Planning Date September 5, 1979 Date September 20, 1979 Revised 6/1/79 mile No. ZE-144-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on September 20, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman, Abby Byrne and John Culler and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Dennis York for a Zone Reclassifi- cation, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office for the purpose of an office. B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, pasture, and commercial. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for industrial development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural Suburban. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion. 7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor disapproval of the proposed use. 1 =ile No. ZE-144-79 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Dennis D. York for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be approved. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off-site drainage and access plans before issuance of building permits. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Montgomery Drive for right-of-way. 3. Applicant shall dedicate a twenty (20) foot radius on Montgomery Drive and University Road. 4. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and pave to existing pavement on Montgomery Drive and University Road. 5. Applicant shall construct cement concrete sidewalk on Montgomery Drive and University Road. 2 =ile No. ZE-144-79 c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is IRVINE WATER DISTRICT #6 and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed by the Planning Department staff. f) ZONING 1. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3 :ile No. ZE-144-79 3. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. g) That the Spokane Fire Marshall advised that adequate water and the dis- bursement of such water is required prior to any construction. h) Subject to the modification of the parking requirements in agreement with the specifications of the County Engineer's Office. i) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi- cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance. Motion by: Culler Seconded by: Byrne Vote: Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairman zll E eta ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: 4 STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-144-79 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Dennis York STATUS OF APPLICANT: Buying Property PROPERTY OWNER: Jeff Capual (Pacific 1st Federal) REQUESTED ZONING: Residential Office EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural Suburban PROPOSED USE: Office building PROJECT LOCATION: Northwest corner of University Road and Montgomery Drive II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 1,2,450 sq. ft. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Areas on all sides of proposed site are of a more intensive zoning but many still have residential uses. Office use would be appropriate in this area. LAND USE: Site Residence North C . I . C . Studio East Pasture West Single family residence South Undeveloped and Western Refuse Office Southeast Roundup Food ZONING: North Restricted Industrial, established, 1979 East Restricted Industrial, established, 1978 West Restricted Industrial, established, 1979 South Restricted Industrial, established, 1977 Southeast Restricted Industrial, established, 1973 1 ZONE RECLASSI FICATIO' IUMBER: ZE-144-79 ' II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial area NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: Two NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: None Total Square Feet Approximately 2,148 sq. ft. Percent of Coverage 17.25% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: One PARKING REQUIRED: 4 PROVIDED: 5 III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Site is surrounded by more intensive coning and uses to the south while restricted use prevail to the north. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. No comments received. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall obtain approval for on and off-site drainage and access plans before issuance of building permits. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Montgomery Drive for right- of-way . - 3. Applicant shall dedicate a twenty (20) foot radius on Montgomery Drive and University Road. 4. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb and pave to existing pavement on Montgomery Drive and University Road. 5. Applicant shall construct cement concrete sidewalk on Montgomery Drive and University Road. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is IRVINE WATER DISTRICT #6 and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. 2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION -NUMBER: ZE-144-79 c IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed by the Planning Department staff. f) ZONING 1. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. • 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Adminis- trator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. Direct light from any exterior area lighting fixture shall not extend over the property boundary. 3 , AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Time: Thursday, September 2 0, 197 9, 1:3 0 P . M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 9. ZE-144-79, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office a, Location: Section 8,Township 25 N,,Range 44,E.W.M, East 83 feet of the S 1/2 of Tract 13, Fruitland Addition, EXCEPT the North 150 feet thereof. b. Vicinity Location: West of University Road, north side of Montgomery Drive. C. Applicant: Dennis D. York West 606 Third Avenue Spokane, WA 99204 d. Site Size: '>12,450 square feet e. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban, est. June 5, 1955 f. Proposed Zoning: Residential Office 9. Proposed Use of Property: Office h. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4. 21 , Section 4. 21 .040 i, Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-330 (2) provides that: " , In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E . I . S , shall be prepared." -9 - r TY J /J d > IRE' a AV 4 79 14 ;r- F ^4 0 Qom.: ~1~~ - ~µ~.{E ~ ~ IDG 502 BUCKEYE _ EY wE~ BUCKEYE r-j t o w J`lK5 h 4 MOMTGulgERX DR Pit \ I ► 1 - JTGOK'ER"C. i MhATGOMERI DR i~~IrlO SR290 _ T ~ I 9 CL 1969 cp 0X P.IRh V z 5Hc•NNON: pfow SHANNON N ; 7 w W _ Z W ~ Z icMit 11 I j DfAnA ~E I DI R A v ~~~G 1 ? RA v E i e F ~ ~ MORA t < w 2 7 Z O 0 ~ M I! ION ~ ~ EL . O 0 f O "IA X L I Y f W h ~wu~ M 'wEIL polo O ♦r QIN70 L !SHARP O ~ AR E boa. Z J T p J W a a.+. i i NIP - , A .1~. .1 r 1 4 LLE(I POK TAT E ~FIRE DEPARTIAENT 5 . svlaae, EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 September 10, 1979 Marcia Raines, Zoneing Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 l Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone change's have keen reviewed fori'f i re protection: ZE-91-79 yTrentwood Irrigation Di,srict #3 ZE-145-79 Barker ty ~ZE-116-791 Haffner,,'` h ZE-144-79 J York The above need mains wand ,hygkants . to be i nst~l 1 ed in the areas. Access plans for fire ightyin~g►;.equipment jroghc the building shall be approved prior to~`k,u,i1 d.j ng perpi t i 5 sgan ce . } C ~r r 4i r r • t S3rerely, t t r-n t:''aof , specons ~ tt'.a4;r AC:$n q n 4,4 ~1' z1y . y E1 t V~ E~ ~.r 3 S EP 13 SPOKANE C~~N MENT PLANNING DEPART r PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote August 31 , 19 79 Inter-office Communication To Zoning Administrator From County Engineer Subject ZE 144-79 # 6 # 8 - 5' on Montgomery Dr. #20 - on Montgomery Dr, and University Rd. #11 - on Montgomery Dr. and University Rd. #13 - on Montgomery Dr. and University Rd. Form 327-C R r FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson i ' 456-5786 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 ~ 0 sjC " : as ' SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE September 1 3,, 1979 Ara N9 in emu 11 U E E TO: :,FRED f' 197 FROM: LLOYD DYKES SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS SCHEDULED FOR THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 ZN-50-79: Agricultural to residential mobile homes. Water adequate for fire protection would be required and disbursement of this water also re- quired, i.e. hydrants, etc. in the event a mobile home park facility is established. ZN-123-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZW-112-79: Agricultural to restricted industrial. Adequate water and the disbursement of such water for fire protection is required prior to any construction. ZN-83-79: Agricultural to manufacturing. Adequate water and disbursement of such water is required for fire protection prior to any construction. ZW-140-79: Agricultural to commercial. Adequate water and disbursement of such water is required for fire protection prior to any construction. ZE-145-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZE-116-79: Acbequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. h ZE-144-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZW-136-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZE-91-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. LD/kmj :w CL t lwnr FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson 456-5786 N SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 September 19, 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE TO: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONE RECLASS FICATIONS ZE-91-79, ZN50-79, ZN-123-79, ZW-112-79, ZN-83-79, ZW1-140-79, ZE-145-79, ZE-116-79, ZE-144-79, ZW-136-79 I These zone reclassifications are required to have adequate water and disbursment of such water for fire protection purposes. A water plan is required to be submitted for approvall prior to any construction or use of these properties. LD/ba ECEIIEU T CO~N~y~Nj Sp~y~p,NE ~ppRTM PLAN~~~~ D File # ZC r 7 Sec. T'sh'p ;?-r R'ge l L Classification hil Proponent r0 2 Qn.1 r°t COUNTr I.:JV" 1+0U9E % , x - ( , - tb 17, STAFF RMaM OF ENVMQNME=AL_ .HE .KLIS I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance'and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any add tional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the A 111 1 The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Action (s) Requested: / Zone Change; Preliminary Plat Approval: _ Final Plat Approval; Change of Condition Other: B. Description of Proposal: Lt 1 C. Location of Proposal: A16r Cs Gd &1v- eta IgIPIgIt-M-t4v II. Review of Checklist:, A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) Air (9) Natural (16) Utilities / Resources (3) Water (10) Risk of (17) Human Upset Health (4) F16ra (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) , Housing (19) _ Rec. (6) / Noise (13) Trans d (20) _ Arch./ Circ. Hist. (7) Light & (14) ZPublic (21) Other Glare Services 8. Potentially si _nificant adverse impacts are notes} under the following questions : V man Revised 6/1/79 C. Discussion of impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendationsr Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes th!~ there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recom*.nends s sues a proposed declaration of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recommends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/is sues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist -A.,Zd nPLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 72.1 JEFFERSON STREET I pp'' ,PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE WAS14INGTON 99260 SI~ONANL COuhi t ,J;f duJSi C.URREWT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1- DOE 6. S"ear1•--N s tr+e" (Reg. Off) 2. Spo. Co. Health Dust. 7. DAp tm6nt -of-Game-- ( Env i tonmen to 1 ,Health,) (Re-g. Off)' 3. DSHS 8'- [ --t-A erit-of Nwturai (Reg. Off) ('Reg. Off) 4. 'Fire District #J_ 9 • State-Pa~tc - -R ccea t^i.oa mrn s.~.en 5. Water- Di strict # 6 10. "M 11. FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agencytesignation, Threshold Determination,, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all oe some. 'of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division. of Spokane County, has determined that the ,County, as an ACTING" AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: -o?S- 71, rte- S tJ ~f In SOS, OFD. . ,~.U-10i'5 D. ya ©~i~~ c~ s - This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040) (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you Wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided i'n WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on September 5,197-9 Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than 'the public hearing scheduled for _ September 20,, 1979 The subject proposal or action IS IS NOT) LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIG- NATED SPOK44E_ VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER; AND AQUIFER` ENVIRON- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED' BY THE- SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise u-s as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground' Water Impact' Evaluation (GWI E) "should be prepared. Enclosures Rev. 4/17/79 r; 7- J 6 VE, I uL PAS t V -EIr. m o ~ A . t - - - ZE 144 75 PP. / . F Law .:r ; . P, -So ::n E 0 502 U BUCKEYE Z E AVE g .EYE o = / ~I 0 ♦ / ` 1 JA(,KSpft_ OR. SAW O., ®p RGd•EK 64ONTGOMERY DR o-e DS w ~ ti L. /l69 co Ok K V. K N K N •'~fAaa t t J 9 z 1 "Aft NNOW: SHANNON W ~ a z ►aOcuJ oIaMp ,VE. I 01 A . SIP V :J r VE ~,~t r p IL MORA c~ 13 a O Pit k", x o aA19 1®0d p EL. 0/ 0 0 0 o eg dl 'F t ; 0 i SIN** PO%AIL ~ T r ~oorrW9LL M ',r►iELI e _ 1:4N10 SHARP ; ~ o ~ a • p cr. A~ z F foal. ► ~ ~ ~ • W oo~Mar J ,L P p ~'~~~~~F. ~ '.lit ►''i 4 01 F14 4 - -7 ile Sec. -'vr ap .-Rg e . • ENVIROII -14TAL CHEMIST .•K•.LL :.~~J'• tip.! •JL,t Ent-cductian: The State Environmental Polirf Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RC'd, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when lice=nsing private proposals. The Act also reouir+eis that sn EnvirvnMntal Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per '1AC 197-10) affecting the quality of the pnysical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to hlep the agencies in- volvea determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following ouescions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. Tlhe reviewers of the checklist Mill be aware of and concern themselves °oith the decree of impact, asking you for more Information, if necessary. 'Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you be-Tieve an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, inrluoe your exolanati,on in the space provided. or use additional cages, if necessary. You srouid include references to any rtports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies invoiva~d with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The roilowing questions 3oply to your total proposal, not just to the license for whicn you are currently applying or the pro- 2osal for which aoproval is sought. Your answers should include she impacts whicn will be causad by your proposal when it is completed, even though cstmoletion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved co complete their environmen mi review now. wichouc duplicating oaoerwork in the future. ,No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the ipproprlate County desartzment. State law requires expianarions for every "yes" and "-avbv` answer on the checklist. The person cairn lating cne form may be retiulred to provide explanations for 'no" answers, ana in sove cases, wore decal ed information to aid in a thresnoid aetermynation. NOTE: This is a standard form being used ay all state and local agencies in the State of mashing*_on for various types of proposals. Many of the ou_stions apay not apply to your proposal. If a ouestion does not apply, gust answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. . ,1VIt3DHHSNTAL C:4ECXLIST MRM 1. BACkGROUNO 1. Plame of Proponent: 'r 0, Phone Humber e~91Z-t?1,3,1_ 2. Address of ?rngonent: 3. Gate checklist suomit.ed: -7-7 ';t -7C3 u. 4gency Requiring Checklist: r ~ -s. liana' of Proposal, if opal ic3o . S. 'latura and Grief Description of me Prorosal (inciuoina out not 1m,tea to its size, g~ er' des; n ete<riezt an other factors 'ha E. wi 11 give an accurate understanoi no of n ts scope anti na cure) : L - `T? &L 77~ 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of _ne arooosel, as well as .lie extent of :he land area affected by any enviro "ntal impacts. includ g any the informatio neBaaa ca give~an sccurate un Arsta ing or the environ- rrsental sitting of the proposal): d , a. Estinaced gate for C „ le*_ian of the proposal: f J!M(n 9. cis( oiz al Perm,i-s. Lican»es or -overnmenc Approvals =eouirea for the Proposal (federal, state and local - :nc?uaina rezones): [:F SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS [HAOEQiUATE, OLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) i0a. Oo fou, or :he owner in the event you do not mo the subJect land. have any plans for future additions. expansion. or further a tivity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. expiain: lob. Co you can or nave captions on land nearoy or adjacent to this prooosal's location? If yes, explain: il. Oo you know of any plans by others the udino the owner which may off ct :ne orogerty covered ay eraaosal or ishe 30 scent air nearoy? tP yes. explain: Xur 12. Attach any other application fora that nas been cproletad regaraina :he proposal; if none nas =inn completed. DUE is to be filed at game future Bate. describe the nature of such application farm: axe 40 ll 11. ENVERONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes .Havbp 'ifs 1. Eartn. niili tom: oroaosal result in: ;a) Unstaole earth c_nditions or fn changes in geologic :_r~Qc:urpst X! (b) QisrslDcions, t:isolacen"rs, comoac_ion or overcovering of the s0117 QV1/?~ I'cl Change in capograony or grcuna surface relief feeturas? - 4a) Ttie des_ruc=ion. ccvering o mrldifi 4 ion cf an unique ze31 C-c - or 2ny_ical fe3cur•fls? / w1t, GYSY/ c fz ;~.P!{ - (a) Any iOtrease in wind or water erosion gzT saiis, either on or of the site? _ I I A (IF SPAC. zYPLAINAT !ON IS IitADEOUATE, PLEASE Ai ACH AM . _ ?;GEES. ) Changes in deposition or erosion of heacn sands, or chances in ailtation, deposition or erosion wnich may modify the channel of a ri•.er or stream ?i or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 2. :dir. Will the proposal result in: YesMayge tlo (a) Air emissions or delterioration of ambient air quality? . _ . . . • • . . • • ~a (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (c) Alteration of air mve ent. moisture or temperature, or any mange in cl itrate either I,o 11 or regionally? . . . . . . _ Explanation: f Ir..tL4it/~1'~ J.rl G ~Il -i~/C~/( 3. ',later. Will the proposal result in: Yes Idaype ale (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a _ (b) Changes in absorotion rates. drainage Patters, or the rate and k ,:mount of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . -Y i" (c) Alterations to me course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any war-or body? . . . . . . . • . . _ x (e) 01scharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water 1 L X quality, including but not limiteo to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (f) Alteration of the direction or race of floe of ground .raters? . . . . . . - (g) Change in tno quantity of Sound :waters, nigher through dirict additions or withdrawals. or :iirougn interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . • . . • • . s~ (h) Oeterioration in ground water quality. either througn direct injection, or cnrough me seepage of ieacnate, pnoscates. - detergents. Natenorne virus or bacteria. or other substances ff into the gound waters? . . . . . . . . . (1) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for ' public water suopiies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanacion:4, 42-4 ell. 3. Mora. 14i i i the ,roposal result in: Yes Maybe NO (ai Chan»e in the diversity of saeties, or nuter of any spades of rr ora (including trees, shruos, grass, craps, micros'lora and aquatic olants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the numers of any unique. rare or endangered soecies of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species or flora into an area, or G/~ in a barrier to the normal replenishment or existing species? . . . . . . . . . ~ (d) Reduccion in acreage of any agricultural crop? _ -Explanation: T!~A( C.) ~G ~ ~ ctl:./~inrr-4 ~s/y-• ~.lt,C ~ v : Lliff~-Q ~tY3~_t ~ .D~7.v~..it ,/'..'~1 ~ .Cr3 S. Fauna. Will the orovosa) result In: - Y. ss ~~av a NO (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any soecies of fauna (birds, land animIs including reotiles, fisn and sneilfish. ben-chic organisms. insects or ;Hcrofauna)? . . . . . . . . _ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare, or endangered soecies of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) intraduction of new species of fauna into an area, or "suit in 3 oarriar to .ha migration or wnoverznt of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (d) Oet=_rtoration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Exoianation: o. "40-4 Se. 2 ns '4avoe NO (a) '(ill the a"poosal ircreasq existing poise )eve ) . . . . . . . . . :xoianation: id) n ~~11. - i. Licnt and Glare. Yes Mav a 80 V , (a) ui1i the pia Waal p>;oduca ns+ ?lobe or glare? &4 Explanation: .1~,~I~ a:-' t.-f t Cti j.-• ,C C ' v - 1/ cow c + (IF SP FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH AD .DNAL PAGES ) 8. Land Use. Yes MaYbe No (a) will the proposal result in the alteration of the oresent or planned land use of n ar a? . . . . . . . . Exolanation: 'Zwen 46 FA -ic'E 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . . . . . • . • • • • • • • ►xclanation: 10. Risk of Uoset. Does the prooosal involve a resk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe No release o hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, cnemicals, or radiation) in the event of an acc.cent or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: 11. Population. Yes Maybe No will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: 12. Housing. Will the prooosal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Exolanation: 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement? . . . . . . . . . _ _Y _ (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? . . . . . . . . (c) Imoact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i (e) Alterations to wateroorne, rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (f) Increase in traffic hazards to .motor vehicles. bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . _ R , Exolanation• gz;~ AS a V Z7 14. Puolic Services. Will the proposal nave an effect upon, or result Yes Mayoe No in a nee for new or altered governmental services in any of G of the following areas: (a) Fire Protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y (b) Police protection? . . . . = 1" (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .L (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . . . . . . (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . Explanation: C i' ~l 2f s- v (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 15. Enero . Will the prooosal result in: Yes Maybe yo (a) Use of suostantial amounts of fuel or energy? (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the oevel men of new sources of a eray? Exolanation• 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, Yes Mayoe No or alterations :o the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? • • • • • • • . (b) Communication systems? (c) 'Aater7 . (d) Sewer or septic tanks? ~r (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . .L' 3 (I CE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTAC TONAL PAGES.) (f) Solid waste a d disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: Ae /7A AX- 17 /1 L ?A Yes Mme No 1i. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards No or potentia health hazard (excluding mental health)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Exolanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or,will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal resuit in an impact upon the auality or quantity Ly of existing recreational opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: 20. Archeoloeical/Historical. Will the oroposal result in an alteration of a Yes NO significant arcneo ogical or historical site, structure, object or building? . . . . . . _ Exolanation: Ill. S It G,YAT'JRE 1. the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful representation or wil ful lack of full disclosure on my gart,Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of on,svonificance tnat i .n ght issue in reliance upon this checklist. Oate• Proponent: (Please Print or Type) proponent: Address: Phone: ' vJ ® e - ?erson completing form: Phone: Date= 77- Oepartment or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: } FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: July 5, 1979 Application No: ZE--144-79 Name of Applicant: Dennis D. York - r Street Address of Applicant: West 606 Third Avenue City: Spokane State: Washington Telephone No. 624-9131 Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural Suburban Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 6/5/55 Existing Use of Property: Residence Proposed Zone Classification: Residential Office Proposed Use of Property: Office Legal Description of Property: East 83' of the South 2 of Tract 13, Fruitland Addition, EXCEPT North 150', all in Spokane County, Washington. Section: 8 Township; 25 Range: 44 Source of Legal: First American Title Co. Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 08541-0132 Property Size: 83 x 150 Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: d 2=E Street Address of the Property: 7" Who Bolds Title to the Property: z2 22L If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Q e! L Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. -1- ~ d Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? e9=, ~ + S + a 1 L- r 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) Z A5~&, 7- 1-lzg' ZS 7- _r7--X-0 • I. the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. eel Signed) (Date) -2- ZONING WORKSHEET Form C Applica icn -Z L= «y J,,cument ,;ill provide the Planning Deparunent ji:aff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable, r 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That -adequate provisions for the proposed development can he prcvi-ied `,:)r: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to present a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN wit^ this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in seauence listed below PART I - to be completed y Spokane County Engineer A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed l. 1) State DOT Review required: Ye s 2) .access ro be limited to: , 3)G-Access permit is required 4) a. cation. for right-of-wa;; is r=quire:. feet on ---Road , >treet , ,.~enue . ) b,~ Radius ( foot) is required. (0 r1/ and Road ,tret, 1. ~r.,. . ) C. --Slope easement is required 5) Drainage Plan is required, on-site /1--off-site. 5) ing Permit is required. feet on Ro d . ) ILn5 rb is required, (along oad , Street, Avenue.) 3) Y-4~L4 idewalk is required. (alone Road, Street, "`%venue. ) 9) plicant must be willing to participate in fuhire T JID/RID . 101 -Legal description is acceptable as reviewed . Parcel Rio. Comments: ..lane Da t- ZONING WORKST=19ET-continued-2 =7-II -to be completed by Spokane County Utilities Department 4 preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane Count,► rTtilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development is/is not located in a public sewer serrice area operated and maintai%dby, Spokane. County. 2) A storm drainage planot required for th roposal. Comments: Signe Date PART_ TIT- to be c mvieted by ~nokane County Water Pu ,"eycr 1) The proposed development is located with the district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agreement/arrangement has/has not been made to serve this proposal. 3) Werare/are not able to supply this development with adequate potable water. 4) VVe`aWare not -Able to supply this development with ade,-u;-ite 'Nc`er _cr fire flow. 5) Water Purveyor is public, private community, privata , ether: - b) Water system is is not under State Utilities jurisdicticn. 7) Indicate size cf main for hook up: inches. 8) Distance to main: "'ic" ~ T. feet . B. to be completed by Apglicant 1) Individual water supply will be develope w_ without fire protection capabilities. Comments: 'Signed Da to C. If proposal is outside the boundaries of any -water district, the State Department cf Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to application. 1) I/We have rAviswed the proposal. It -pCpears to meeL, Mate requirements iOr ouoli~ ~,~Y3t~r. ZONING WORKSHEET continued-3 PART Fir - to be completed by Soorane County Fire Marsh 31 1) Proposal is located in Fire District 2 access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Fire flo is s not adequate for proposed development an CIS /._s not required. 4) Main(s) need to be installed. 5) Hydrant(s) need to be installed. 6) Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) 7) Nearest fire hydrant is feet. 8) Driving dist?nce to nearest fire station is Comments: igned Date PART I - to be ommlete~ by Sr;1-.ane Ccunry _ ~1J,rrIc- A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: , 2) Air qualiWis not a concern with this proposal. 3) Ground water cuality,)<Jis not a concern with this proposal. 4) Noise)`/is not a concern with this proposal. 5) Light is/t~s-~ a concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: 66, C, A AI4 Sign Date .t;EIVE S EP "J 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ZMW8 7/) Being first duly sworn, deposee and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. I pn e- That on he personally posted. taw" true and correct copies of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following palaces in Spokane County, to-wit: 1. Fa 10(n43 2. 3. a Subscribed and sworn to me l9a d NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHING" )N Residing at Spokane, Washington 29 I T t AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) STEPHANIE BRUMLEVE being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of The United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the 7th day of September 19 791 I personally deposited in the United States mail at lst and Wall with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the 10th day of August 1979 1 19, who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) foot periphery of the applicant's controlled property. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. DATED this 7th day of September 19 79 SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day of 19~ . -ION otary P is in and for the Sta e NOTARY ~ of Washington, residing at Spokane. PUBI_`C APP I ATION NO. - 7` -79 %~A Vilk, S ; FORM D LIST OF OWNERS AND P ONS PING 'SAXES PROPERTY Spokane County Cade Number-, ZE-144-79 Owners and Persons within 400 feet. Zone Change, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office Application is for a Certification of Title Com an : I hereby certify that the following liet of names and ` yaddressee consisting this and the following pages has been prepared from the latest available records and is to the hest of my knowledge correct. _ Signed by F'or FIRST AMERICAN TITLE CQ I 1C. Date: - W. 704 FWT AVENUE + SPOKANE, WA 99204 i LAST GRANTEE IN CHA OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS ADDITION PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) r FRUITLAND ADDITION OIL... Bueckers 08541-0125 # 2421.0f S~ Ll'd I I-- E. 10507 Montgomery Dr, T Laurence J. Buecker s Spokane t VIA 99206 O Ray Sal ing 0 8 5 41012 6 pt of Lt 12-13 N B12 ; N B Rt. 3 Box 68 1113 Exc N 135' o W T Ray L. Saling Cheney, WA 99004 p Able Bldg. Contr 08541-0127 pt of L12-13 Exc 1211 of S 12 W 311 13 E. 10609 Montgomery Dr r o r -T Able Bldg. Contr 3~0iTnQa1lq pt of It 13 S E c N 150' & E . 14901 Valley Tay xc W, 121' & xc E UP ` T Kenneth L. Ingalls la 99216 *241blg xc TAT E. 10609 Montgomery Dr 121 . T ]ale ld 0 C.W. McAr h E. 10606 Buckeye T Clair W. McArthur a 0 O Campbell Etal, 08541--0131 E got Qf U, T niF S;5 t 13 E. 14901 Valley Way T Kenneth L. z cells okane WA 99206 - o J.A. Ga aul 08541-0132 t of Lt 13 E- 8311 of S141 EXC • 150' ac lst Fed S & L #13 7 150788 2 0 John Gillin ha 08541-0135 t o Lt 15 N 200 of Fo 100' N. 2511 Oberlin St. of W 270' T Lillian Gladeau S okane WA 99206 0 ohn W. Gillingham, 08541-0177 Lt 14 & to of It 15 E of E Ve-ney, 05 4th St. In of Oberlin Rd d E In T Rohn W. Gillingham WA 99004 extended South. Continued on next page 1 All LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY VAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS ELK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) r FRUITLAND ADD. 0 Robert L. Lokken 09542-9010 S 131.4' of N 262.8' of W tr DAFT in S02 of N W14- Beg T Seafirst Mtg. Corp. KP 24559 S at NW cor of s of NWT - th S 1.3' E 0-58.79' N 641.31 0 th W 658.66' to POB. T C 0 R 9'-25-44 W of 'fi'r; in S~ of 120055 28th Ave. ~y~~~74 B]eg S 6 4 at11~.W 3T t1 cor of S[8. 1 o'f~ - tLL y 1E6 5 9 '1` G . R. Le 22e NYY M TAI 658 . C 5' to t ti N T=. r- 0 POB Exc N 262281 T 0 Industrial Properties D 5 - E;,- of folg Pt of SA of NA R 9 212 Montgomery eg a cor o S 2 o Nine d 1-00 th s 641.3' th E 658,791 th Tlndustrlal Properties 1 1 to Spokane, WA 99206 . 0 IPOB. T OFred neyears Pro , Inc.09545-9046 T W4 3800 SE 22nd Ave. Exc E 200' of W 530' of N T Fred Meyers Prop, Inc. Portland OR 97 202 2001 1 N,~ of SW o lyg Nly of RR R/[ T 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 I (Continued on next page) F - %a I 7p . • ~1 a 'i ~ '*9 - - - i a x1 k r 4 di r~ , y V 7 54 1 it S , , , ~v i~ 51 , - a ~ I 6.3'4 1-73 ex sad _ I ,7 r 144 F -G 4'f - - $ ~ .R 16e f I VIC ~ I I { i B I l 43 { ~ ~ p u 1 f IQ ~ I ~ JJ I 1 1 t I d I I ~ I j\J-O LfJ, MAN Cx _ LJ d Sp fj 411, - I t , i I ~ f F 1 f _ f 77 17-44711 16 - .i- - - f ik f 1 i 078,_ i ~ I I !J6 A J vv 6 . E 1-313 ~r At said time and place, any interested person may appear, for or against, the granting of this application. AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Time: Thursday, September 20, 1979, 1:30 P.M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 9. ZE-144-79, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office a. Location: Section 8 , Township 25 N . , Range 44 , E . W . M . East 83 feet of the S 1/2 of Tract 13, Fruitland Addition, EXCEPT the North 150 feet thereof. b. Vicinity Location: West of University Road, north side of Montgomery Drive. C. Applicant: Dennis D. York West 606 Third Avenue Spokane, WA 99204 d. Site Size: 12 , 450 square feet e. Existing Zoning: Agricultural Suburban, est. June 5, 1955 f. Proposed Zoning: Residential Office 9. Proposed Use of Property: Office h. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 i. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-330(2) provides that: " In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E . I . S , shall be prepared." -9 - J J J --J~~-al~~ v ~ t a L E 144 79 Lai C' s 6285 ~ r lido ~L.1►/ 'tI ~ ~ ' / i ~ IDG 1 i • 1 Er A vE';,,..• 502 bU K E Y E BUCKEYE _ i O o t •c \ 2 0 L JALKSON WONT Oll - lTGO~,ER"~~ i M(+LTGOMEKr A&. KPWM4 1 - s b'~~Nf E~ 1969 ~k ON~ V ~waer K X K N o- tifA=~. rJ i z , •a 04offt NNON M N~NAION , to n W A > ~ ►alcul ~ ann ~E I 01 A WORA o *orN AVE NORA 1 < = o oNC a a MISSION DEL. 4rp 0~ > I S~l~O t " Wei M 'IvEL ~~NTU Q t r ~ ALMMP s HARP V AR Q til I - 1 G N r r. cl -j Q Lai I PRE-APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: 7131711 Application No:Z /c/4 Z!=-~ of Applicant: Street Address of Applicant: city. State:;, Telephone No . J Zip Code; Existing Zoning Classification: Date Existing Zone Classification Established: - Existing Use of Property: Proposed Zone Classification: - Proposed Use of Property: FFL F Legal Description of Property; gib %Aj L(norl) 7- ~IAA77.1 /,4U~FZ:~ Section: Townships r nL Range:. Source of Legal: Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statements 1- 0/3 Q Property Size: 193 /!T 1464.1-9060 BLACK 79-1375 319366A ri 61C CONkfY ETAL. 09/18/79 TAX UNPD FIRE IMPROVED UN'IMP.gOVE0 TOTAL LAMD TNIPR. TOTAL AL:RES APES VALUE ACRES VALUE ACkES• VALUE +9AL LIE YR EX CODE 16. 77 9350 . F,)0 16.77 9,350 3,5200 44550 81 220 16.77 9350 .00 16.77 935,0 35200 4455th 220 16,77 9350 . UO 9350 35200 44-550 14-26-44 '4937.18' OF I,,1192' O 1M1 /4 OF NE 1 /4 EXC RD y°'_ _ _ _ } t 1 ..w . Q ~ n 'E ~H...... r b t Y 1 ¢$D 8 wgwwa+.uwpx«p..w m.~ .M1~'aa v~:'irv:4 ~$%~k*'°.4,.+:„. +:~»t":..::.Y, v. .~4.~».:;~'.,w; 9 "t r ~ a g ~ s d i r a $ & k ~ & t k S ~ y` ~ 8' q ~ b . ~ r 3 3 E E 3 ~ 6~'. E Y 9 L 1 3 } y...... M { i 6 P 4 9 f 1 a r i ~ f q.. 3 t e ~t a f.... . P^ Y ~g ~4 ~ ' E }3 k~kea.s+..' T 6 x ggg 9 8 i 9 d ~ ~ a @ ,yy C ' ~ . 38 b- k E E 8 A Po 'Q ~ 3 9° I 8" 3 '4 t .:a::,2:.-~-".Sw:=R%E'b. ":b',~' aarec.auw.'-n'u'«a...r'.:w&~ d .E 5 ji ~ s 7 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ' 3 f i } i > r A. R g t n i i r 9 ~ I N i i E p p r'. ...a+ ~ rc..ven:.rw».awnm ..~,..w~we.:.aa~~~*~.w»:.~..,»..a.... sa~...w.we.,. M.~., m:;:.. m.~w»«»«.......~«a......«,.~,.,...ww.w,.wa:..... m.o ...............~..»...n.9..+nwd..w .........p . gq~ ~ Y y.. dr . , s.... .re Y j } ~ i a l ...w w.~~.~,..,,.~ ~..~M.~,......._.. ~......w M.. ,.~,rv... ~.ww ..w .w.... , , . . . . . i - , K yy . . . m 8 g~ p& 9 ~ xmdm+.a'..~=~'w-ezW,r~:~1we66en~8ah.!:s:-'~n'~5'~.rav«...~'tl. .«%'<.~..,rci„.~wemw~,:., .»w.......~M..... . .....-.....s. ......,,.v,......