Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-145-79
~ -r ~y Zone Reclassification Checklist Aj22l1rAnt'c Name No- A2pllcant'g c/o KWO04A 9zy-9gry 1 11 I 9 z,6 - g1 r, r Z -tV r- 77 INITIALS- PRE-APPLICATION FEE, ($10.00), RECEIPT NUMBER , (date) APPLICATION APPOINTMENT (date) (tune) PT- . ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP. ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership) ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION. L Lit- A- iL ZONING WORKS HEFT ~ 1 - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. PLOT PLANS (S biackline) - (setbacks, road frontage, square footage, open space) . PLOT PLAN TO GRAPHICS (date) PHOTOS (8 x 10 and description) SIGNS (4' x 4') APPLICATION FILING FEE(s) RECEIPT NUMBER fZ7,~ (date) r TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPES, ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT (date) STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FINDINGS PREPARED (date) POST SURROUNDING AREA (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED ~ (date) MAIL" AGENDA TO CON=USMD AGENCIES (date) FINDINGS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) FARLILL HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) S EPA's Notice of Action ti' SOUTH 813 PINES ROAD S', .ANE, WASHINGTON 99206 L-- IJ J J J J ~ Em-'A" T-,'A-- - G Er N-,f - Em 1.1 T (509) 928-7900 : a.- ~ Imo. ~.~.►~ars_ ..-aen.K.o ✓Mr. Ken Kirsch October 12, 1979 Assistant Zoning Administkator Spokane Co -rty Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Re: ZE-145-79 Dear Ken: Enclosed, please find the receipts for certified mail and return receipts for the above captioned project, Sincerely, Robert J. Bethards A s REALTOR A-- a,---. P RA6 0 -t-- AU F U70 F-- Ll ~5 l rS' ` 30' ell rer l r A ~ g .r slaa y ~ s 1li~.iry ~~v MAP ~ sc J(e, ~ ~ • C~ETA~~.~ ~ t , cv, t~5 F7 Z s 4.. APPROVED PLOT PLAN L zr a- m BY: 24 j , - BLDG . ~ L ! DATE: { t o, J G ' QJPAr, 14o0 sa~ RO3EcT- D.,Ta E ~ c'S' Ex15-FIM6 ?MoN(NG AGRICULTCeAL v 8 Pa crux) s (ls PROPOS E D i~cllllj i NG : i pRW EC-r AREA : Z . S L ~cXcS BJILDIT`!G CAUEi'cAG E : 2`+, 2 ~5 SCE FT' 076 OPEN) SPACE 71 3L3 Q. Fr , 73 FUTUeU-- CF- MTECLl NE - PASkzuG SE,LD JC) l-~V lug (OZ- AC-TUra L 7 5 P, f t e.to ill &r- um Lcuipl &t- * 8~ oi~ Sf we, Per ~ar p t u ilG'' r'l File # 77 1 I; , Sec. R AI T'sh'P R' ge Classification _ 6-4.0 RX a 1 ti Proponent z4j1z.1.15 T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N Proposed DECLARATION OF Nonsignificance (proposed/final) (significance/non-significance) 1. Description of Proposal: SA~ojas V 2. Proponent: 3. Contact Person: S Phone: !F4 q 4. County Action(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Other: 5. Location of Proposal: s® u-rrol- 6/-- 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to ,e)07' have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name Fred L. Dayharsh Name Signature Signature E s c C C C Title Director Title Chairman Hearing Examiner Comm. Uepdrtment County Planning Department County Planning Dute September 5, 1979 Date September 20, 1979 Revised 6/l/79 File No. ZE-145-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on September 20, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman, Abby Byrne and John Culler and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Robert J. Bethards, Agent, for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial for the purpose of retail shops/warehousing. B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, and railroad tracks. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for commercial development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion. 7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 1 mile No. ZE-145-79 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee does not find the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Willis Barker for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be approved. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. No comments received. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Access permits for the advertised property shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits. 2. An appropriate on-site drainage disposal system shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the release of building permits for the project. 3. Applicant shall dedicate 15 feet on Sprague Avenue for right-of-way. 4. Applicant shall dedicate 60 feet on Second Avenue for right-of-way. 5. Applicant must be a willing participant in any future LID, RID or CRP. 2 -ile No. ZE-145-79 r' 6. Applicant shall construct paved and delineated approaches to meet existing pavement. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is VERA WATER AND POWER and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed by the Planning Department staff. f) ZONING 1. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3 mile No. ZE-145-79 2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 3. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. g) The Spokane County Fire Marshall requires that adequate water and dis- bursement of such water is required prior to the issuance of any building permits. h) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi- cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance. Motion by: Culler Seconded by: Byrne Vote: Unanimous HEARIN EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairman ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: 4 low. STAFF REPORT DATE: SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-145-79 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Willis Barker STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner PROPERTY OWNER: Applicant REQUESTED ZONING: Restricted Industrial EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural PROPOSED USE: Retail shops and warehousing PROJECT LOCATION: South side of Sprage approximately 250 feet west of Conklin Road. 11. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 2.05 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is primarily undeveloped with a single family residence fronting on Sprague Avenue. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The area appears to be in a transition from Residential to Commercial LAND USE: Site Single family, undeveloped North single family, Fields Realty East Single family West Mobile home sales South Railroad tracks and Perfection Tire ZONING: North Agricultural, established, 1942 Residential Office, established, 1972 East Agricultural, established, 1941 West Restricted Industrial, established, 1960 Commercial, established, 1972 South Restricted Industrial, established, 1955 Agricultural, established, 1941 1 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIO' NUMBER: ZE-145-73 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 1 (to be removed) NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 2 Total Square Feet Approximately 24,225 sq. ft. Percent of Coverage 27% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 PARKING REQUIRED: 73 PROVIDED: 102 Ill. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The total site encompases 2.52 acres however, a portion of that total is to be dedicated for street right-of-way. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. No comments received. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Access permits for the advertised property shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to release of building permits. 2. An appropriate on-site drainage disposal system shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the release of building permits for the project. 3. Applicant shall dedicate 15 feet on Sprague Avenue for right-of-way. 4. Applicant shall dedicate 60 feet on Second Avenue for right-of-way. 5. Applicant must be a willing participant in any future LID, RID or CRP. 6. Applicant shall construct paved and delineated approaches to meet existing pavement. 2 ~ r ZONE RECLASSIFICATION!- NUMBER: ZE-145-79 IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is VERA WATER AND POWER and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be accomplished by the applicant within thirty (30) days of formal action by the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee as instructed by the Planning Department staff. f) ZONING 1. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Adminis- trator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 2. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accor- dance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Admin- istrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 3. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. 3 AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Time: Thursday, September 20, 1979, 1:30 P.M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 7. ZE-145-79 Agricultural to Restricted Industrial a. Location: Section 24 , Township 25 N . , Range 44 , E , W , M , The West 3 acres of the East 5 Acres of Tract 33, Vera, less right of way. b. Vicinity Location: South of Sprague Avenue, approximately 100 feet west of Conklin Road. C. Applicant: Willis Barker North 121 Best Road Spokane, WA 99216 d. Site Size: 2.52 Acres e. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established March 27, 1942 f. Proposed Zoning: Restricted Industrial g, Proposed Use of Property: Retail shops/warehousing h. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4 , 21 , Section 4.21.040 i. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-330(2) provides that: it , In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E. I. S. shall be prepared." -7- $ ENL) M 04 e Fey 4 F S~o~ 9Q = out o N O A M O BRIDGE 90 c,.T~► < < Nt46C06 0 0) Q MA ~ ` O ~ BROADWAY AV E. AVE 00TH - 7, 14 13 V ..T Vr Fire a in soy S+ation • ogre5~ L W Sc noo I z W "K I j cf $ Q +10 7 < D d LEYV ~ Q VAL.LC WAY c MN(ON IA e M 0 r_j MAIN I►V( rv u Y RI I r / Y 2 W I Z v 2 I ..j l r- 2 Q ~t 0 Ll 30 llli~~~,~~llll D19- SPRAGUE AVENUE U U K Q E ~t9 0 N? 2312 4. i v V.F- ~AL E 9 „ i e- Ai 5r P~P RR G0. i~ AVE F - - tN 0 St. M r • LL School ei ro '.a a 'N V Z u -Y Q y r > TIM A e..~ .J >f rn I / j _ ~ N BR, DGE -J 0 6~N ~iE 1 G 2 IFLLE N•a509 W 6r' - Rd On~~ , :ADAM ~ intro ' Vol eY . LAKE f 'T lz 7TH %D 24 z - - 1000 N ~ I INN,") I.~ 11 ) iii FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE " N. 811 Jefferson y ' 456-5786 a SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 ~ ~ [I i~, 7a r SPOnANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE September 13, 1979 E C E O TO: FRED DAYHARSH ;PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES SPOKANE COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT RE: ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS SCHEDULED FOR THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 ZN-50-79: Agricultural to residential mobile homes. Water adequate for fire protection would be required and disbursement of this water also re- quired, i.e. hydrants, etc. in the event a mobile home park facility is established. ZN-123-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZW-112-79: Agricultural to restricted industrial. Adequate water and the disbursement of such water for fire protection is required prior to any construction. ZN-83-79: Agricultural to manufacturing. Adequate water and disbursement of such water is required for fire protection prior to any construction. ZW-140-79: Agricultural to commercial. Adequate water and disbursement of such water is required for fire protection prior to any construction. ZE-145-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZE-116-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZE-144-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZW-136-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. ZE-91-79: Adequate water and disbursement of such water for fire protec- tion is required prior to any construction. LD/kmj A t + FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson i 456-5786 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 ~ 1~ ~ • 1 i' » 1 w • September 19, 1979 SPOKANC COUNTY COURT HOUSE TO: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONE RECLASS FICATIONS ZE-91-79, ZN50-79, ZN-123-79, ZW-112-79, ZN-83-79, ZW1-140-79, ZE-145-79, ZE-116-79, ZE-144-79, ZW-136-79 I These zone reclassifications are required to have adequate water and disbursment of such water for fire protection purposes. A water plan is required to be submitted for approvals prior to any construction or use of these properties. LD/ba VV& J tR EC c Y 1 ~3 NN1~~ ~EPp,R~M ~ .f 51)01~ANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTPIENT _ s4aom- e&w4 7",e- ;V4Wze4i%L Oe;se X. EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 September 10, 1979 Marcia Raines, Zoneing Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission N. 721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines,' The following zone changes haws been reviewed fo&fire protection: ~ i ZE-91-79 /Trentwood Irrigation District #3 k ~ ZE-145- 79 j Barker y i ZE-116-79) Haffner ZE-144-79 J/ York The above need rjai;ns=-and,,hydgants to be installed in the areas. Access plans for fi ref ihtngs.equi pment aropnd the building shall be apprgved prior to- 6u,4l0 ng peripi t i§ suan ce . Sincerely, " spe4ons .~i, ,i tat a /A,": yS11 1, i ~t J a 11 y MBA r~+ IT " , + ,F 4't*'-~'~~ - ti`l't CEO S E p 13 1979 SPOKANE COON MENT PLANNING DEPART r' w PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES OFhCE OF COUNTY ENGI EER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote August 31 179-79 Inter-office Communication To Zoning Administrator From County Engineer Subject ZE 145-79 # 1 # 5 # 8 - 15' on Sprague Avenue # 8 - 60' on Second Avenue #15 #16 Form 327-C R File # 7-,57- Sec. Z~ T'sh'p 2"5' R'ge 44 R. il$ 1Ia Classification Proponent ,/Un.thl J,. tl Vim,. STAF1~ REVIEW OF E1V~IIRQNi1r EVVAL CNFr7KITST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance'and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subsequently been reviewed by the poc~i44TM~ The following data briefly describes the proposal: A, Action (s) Requested: Zone Change; Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval; ,,,,,,.Change of Condition O ther: B. Description of Proposal: r,' Q cTZUCrr flW Qr i2FN(L-,Si+t)P-S _AMQ 1,dAffz N 00c,i N(-:) C. Location of Proposal: Snc )4-~ y_A-N~t i C)n II. Review of Checklist:. A. Slight adverse impacts, are noted under the following questions: P (1) /Earth (8) Land Use (15) ~nerqy (2) Air (9) Natural (16) Utilities Resources (3) _zWater (10) Risk of (17) Human, Upset Health (4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (S) Fauna (12) Housing (19) _ Rec. (6) _ Noise (13) Trans (20) Arch. 1 Circ. Hist. (7) Light & (14) Public (21) Other Glare Services B. Potentially significant adversa impacts are noted under the following questions: Revised 6/1/79 t C. Discussion of impacts identified above: t III. Conclusions and Recommendationg Based on this staff review of the prmtronmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues 4 proposed declaration of nonsignificance. B. .Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature Qf the proposal, recommends/issues a final declaration of nonsignifipance . C. Concludes that potentlally Ognificant adverse impacts do exist and recommend $/issue.1 a decla -ation of significance. IV. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist f } i s v i , PLANNING DEPARTMENT Ce BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET' I PHONE 456-2205 d 3 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 s SNOKANL COU141r COuFT MUuSE CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1 . DOE 6. Secs-1-D-s--#-- (Reg. Off) 2. Spo. Co. Health Dist. 7. D (Environmental Health) (Reg. Off) 3. DSH S 8. DQf ~aimtff tei --a-f-(~a- u -~Lt°ees (Reg. Off) (Reg. Off) 4. Fire District # 9. S-ta-t-e-Pa-riCS- -R-eU eat-i-©n-CQmmi_&&ion 5• Water District # 10. H4B-- 1/moC,rF 41 PO wepwe, (Reg. Off) 11. 1~~~i • 6,= -rR, -.vS A 4 FF~ FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING" AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: 2~_~yCS- 79T_ oZ,v -.2S-,v 31- . r¢G. 7-a ~ w 1 L A-/S 8~4~c k~.C Co •uS7. o ~ JIe~T~4♦ 5tfopS . 50 07N /ate of SPreU~ J^Ty~ , a? .S•Z ,4 cxMS. This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040) (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on September 5, 1979 Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for Seatember 20. 1979 The subject proposal or action CT'S'D LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIG- NATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE OURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER ENVIRON- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208, STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GWIE) should be prepared. Enclosures Rev. 4/17/79 004 VL J $•N 1f ENVE Al M1 F 3 0 4 S~ t9~ _ r V UTA u ` h BRIDGE 90 O L4 < N#o546 z ~ ~ - c MA ~ AV E BROADWAY AVE. . 14 6 j, 7' 13 7.7-7, .x r Fire r Fire . ogress sc moo ► c Z Q 40 m EY\ ~ Q v VALLE WAY ~~oN 0 z ■ v co lu : R~ / Y. 2 f f- Z v 2 _ 2 viyr 0 tY ENUE U U ° 01.9 SPRAGUE AV EL. Z049 K N° 2312 o FJOAT AV E 0E `ALE 9 f~ cM Sr pP RR C, 0. , AV E 2~ 3r , ca,r $t.M r No ~ ~ • y SG1~Op~ o~ ~ r0 817, M V Z u .Q r 3 rh r I ~ > TM X01 ' ~T MIR DGE G L7 6 ~M 1vE 2 EL I- E NO 350 9 1 m l 6 W 6 LAKE Rd CIOsrdJ , r ' :P »~9~ aN1 4 4.: eY, ECHO I q H u a IGKT H AvE = I N 3 1.1000. j sip" File r TJC ( 1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Sec. -Twp •-Rge.Z`~-25 " Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely". as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to hlep the agencies in- volved determine whether or not a proposal is such a mayor action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "1layoe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. (here explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-.makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional oases, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and wnich are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total prooosal. not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the pro- posal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your prooosal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paoerwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for ever "yes" and "maybe" answer on the cnecklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanations for no" answers, and in some cases, more detai ed information to aid in a threshold determination. MOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. if a question does not apply, just answer it 'no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. 3ACKGROUNO ~ L~ e Name of Proponent• Phone Number 2. Address of Proponent: ~~1+ r 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: E Name of Proposal, if Applicabie: 6 Nature and 3rief Description of the Proposal including but not limited to its size, general resign elements, and other factors that -4 give an accurate de standing of its scope an nature): rep I 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental imoacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environ- mental settii~l proposal)• ~1i' PK r-;Sr- A 3. Estimated Date for Completion of the Proposal: 9. List of all P its, Licenses or Gave t Approval Requireq 017 or the Prooosal (federal, state and local - inc'uding I r", rezones) (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions. expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner whicn may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: 14 421 ~f 1Z. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal, if none has been completea, but is expected to be filed at some future date, d tribe the nature of sucn application form: II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes yayoe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: X (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . _ (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? . . Jdsl _A _ (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? . . . . . . . . (d) The destruction, covering or modification of any um due geologic or physical features? . . . . • • • • • . • • • • • (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils. either on or off the site? . . . . . _ 4- S (IF SPACE rGR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIUifAL PAGES.) (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . Explanation: CNAW F.4210 !~J Lana C,-al resx) 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes M_aYbe No (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality' . . . . . • (b) The creation of objectionable odors? • • • • • • • _ (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 1_ r isn- n C prC Arm a Yl Lu)-nom n )o lea. 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . .IdI/{ (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body' . . . • _ (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? (g) Change in the quantity of gound waters, eigher through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (h) Deterioration to ground water quality, either througn direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate. phosoates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances into the gound waters? . . (i) Reduction in the amount of water othe-wise availaole for public wat~r supplies? Explanation-CAW 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: fes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species. or number of any species of flora (including trees, snruos, grass, crops, microflora and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique. rare or endangered species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Inrriouction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenisnment of existing species? _ (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricult+.ral crop? . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes May°e No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds. land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare. or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or moveTent of fauna? _ (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife haoitat? . . . _ Exolanation• 6. Noise. Yes Nayoe Vo (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? - Explanation i. Liont and Glare. Yes Ma be No (a) will the pro osal pr duce new light o al re? Explanation: w&J M,*kilcy (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACHE AN ITTONAL PAGES.) B. Land Use. Yes ~l~ybe Na (a) Will rte proposal result in the alteration of the present or ~i planned land use of an area? . . . . . . , Exalanation, `4 e- ' 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? Explanation' 10, Risk of Uoset. Does the proposal involve a resk of an exoipsion or the r~s Mrbe No re ease F hazardous suostances (including, but not limited to, all, pesticide, chemicals, or radiation) In the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation- 11. Pa upon . Les Mfbe No Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . 12. Housing Will the orooosal affect existing housing, or create a dewed for additior+al to+jsing? - Exp 1 aarati ors' 13. Transportation/ V rculatian. 11111 the proposal result in: Yes maybe No (a) Generation of additional venicular movement? . . . , . . . . (b) Effects an existin4 parking facilities, or demand for new parking? . . . . . . (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . , . . . . (d) Alteracions to present patterns of circulation or movement of people andfor goods . (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? , . . . . (f) increase in traffic hazardS to -Mtor vehicles. bicyclists-or Pedestrians? y ~ Exoaanaticn: L 14 Puolic Services. Will the pronpsai have an effect upon, or "suit Yes nx a No in a n~_►d for new or altered governmental services in any of of the following areas: (a) Eire Prow ion? . . . . (b) Police protection? . (c) Schools? . . (a) Parks or other recreational faeilitiesT . . (a) maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . ~ (f) rather governmental services? . . . . . Exp1anatiQn• (IF SPACE FOR XPLANATION [S INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES } ~ype '~o 5. EneM. `1111 the proposal resuit in- Yes (a) Use or suostantiai amounts of fuel or energy? (b) demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? Exalana-clop - WA 16. Utilities. Will the procasal result in a need for new systams, Yes Maybe No or alterations to the followina utilitles: (a) Power or natural gasp (b} Cemaiinication systems? (c) Water? . . . . . . ~ (a) Sewer or septic tanks? (e) Storm water drainage? 3 (It SPACE FOR EXPLANATION iS MAD E~UAT . PLEASE ATTACH gUorT0NAL MGE 5.) (f) Solid waste and d15;osa1? . , . Explanation Yes MLbe YO 17. Human health- will the prooosal result in the creat7or+ of any heiltih hazards or potential healti, huar'd (excluding mental healthy . . . r.. ~xalanaC~ion' r' 18 Aesthetics. FAill tree proposal result in the obstruction, of any scenic vista or view open to he public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to pudic view? . . . . . . . . . axolanatlcn: 19. Recreation. 1411i the proposal result in an iippact upon the duality or quanxxty of existing recreational cppdrtunities7 . . . . . . . . . Arcreolagicai/Histor7cai +M the Qraovsal result in an alteration of a fes ~+a~ a significant arched agical or historical site, structures} ohJect or ~uildlnq? Exolana v on- III . 5MIATURE I, the undersigned. swear under the penalty of oerjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there to any willful ,misreoresenzation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part,Spokane County may oTthdraw any declaration of onsi rfit3ewCe that t m, C s55u2 in reliance loon this c klis r Cate, Rrdpcteent: (Please Print or Type) Rropanent• Address, -L 4 . p ttoree Raison completing form- Phone, 03te. Cepartment or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Staff Member(s) Reviewi"q Checklist. FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: Application No: Name of Applicant: Barker Street Address of Applicant: N. 121 Best City: Spokane State: Washington Telephone Tv q96-6 c;9:Z 99216 Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural, Date Existing Zone Classification Established:_ ~L• Existing Use of Property: vacant Proposed Zone Classification: restricted industrial Proposed Use of Property: retail shops/warehousing Legal Description of Property: the west 3 acres of the east 5 acres of Trar-t _33,,~ Vera L~-S S &J 13 33 Section: 24 Township: 25 Range: 44 Source of Legal: Deed Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 24542-0102 9 Property Size: Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor:` Street Address of the Property: Who Holds Title to the Property: ~ ~tcaV4- _ If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. -1- Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? Sorry-Ke--, Auemjc--~ Le, mcrs~ a~ 4y-, gA, L-o~'s p4i~Olpq ar-2, Yl~ U~ 2 t~ (0. eA, ek agL d- Dalx~c~-J hau~ ve-r-"~4 be~J>A 2. Wha "effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? -ei U&PIA - cy cacc::~ :2;we--, L02 J 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) IT' i"l -P i l 4o f 4nr-) 5 I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. Signed) (Date) - 2 - . ~11~if'.k.} • L1^':.71~ F~ t St:tttiz:,~{,illrr :pl or. . ~ . 1 % qp 7F F i IN TUB MATTER OF CAGING THS SWIM MAP MM , AGRICULM" To Qi MCTA9 IQ1 MIAL IN A ?MI05 OF TVACT 33 OF MMA Iii SECTION 249 TUMSHV 25 N. acs ~t►, t.a.M, t SPOUM MUWT# WASHINGTON* t .y +J t t 1^} r. ! ♦j / s i, n r l r } f t f ~i b t J~ ✓ i i i :1 4Y 1~1i.~ ~E I,:. .11•.,t 71 I,+w3~1.f 1;~ i• `•{.1. arlV for ~v arr'. L'.•4.r...: 1~~J /~'V 1 c j y 1 }r r w- r VJak ] c~ i.o„, on f. ,4 on ♦ Ll~ ~ day, L,, (jam :.iCA~ N►~.1ZV~ i~. Mi l 11 L ~:f Jra L~D d f .I . . r :oaf the th spo!;eix-. _?,,-,i~ R=0" ~.ng aza ►D'~ rmAt'ar in u1i' a provi }-3C: by Sa)i Colrlj'3aon has 11-- old v. qnT.-,f iC 13 -%equir--id; am ~'ia.a"4 fi5J said i'lanrAc n-, C~}►.~~~?~st3lon 25 43 i Taut of Ties M&sspt tbs "t z &am MA ex"Vt the east s awes MA also "*opt that Postlao tit= vat !br Us Go M. We P. & Pe M sight-of-vy, in Beat ioas 240 Towsu p 25 Not man* "so som eme I+IO1VV, THEREFORE: BE IT RESOLVED. that the aLove-deccrlbad p=opeity be.. Band. 013 3ama . herby is,, zonad wider the clcas sifri.^afton of 13 ffl as defined in the Zonjrg ^:°d~,Y:~~c ~ ~lw Spokanne Count adopted ugiunt 25, r1.3 amended. L 1960 _._........_.m.......~ _._b.~.._ PASSED BY TT-U BOARD T ~ S DAY Or ATTEST: FRANK J. GLOVER Clerk c#-ths oat d > oAp-.. Cr C;rUjRTTY COj:t Scj0 N'r.rr 3 .`.~OF SPOKANE COUNTY,, VIAMEM INIGTON Deputy " Tits is to cardfy that 19.Ms is a Lri e aa'id cow ct copy o~ ' Re soltul ona # pa:3s3d by the Eoayd r. 11 _ r day of I Iu~rxeby certfy that I hz,vs pasted, ~Ije above changes and map in tho Buildi ncr C c)d^ do fuxt ter certify that tha ::rrg c!arxificadan change is the name as da J nAbad a:>cv3 and ehown on the SIGNED 1 ZONING WORKSHEET ~ ornI Application = .13 This -!ccument will orcvide th.e Planning Department Staff with written verific-ation tt:at: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal .?escription is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Hiaalth District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire `.tarshal and Water Punrevor. T1;-'t 2decu'at'2 pro%risicr?s _:r the oropc-sed residential, commercial, industrial and mininc uses. An applicant is required to cre^ sent a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN wil[h this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed belay] _ ) PART I - to be completed by Spokane County Engineer preliminary ccnsultation meeting has been held with t ,,t -pCI:-n,' ~llr. nC; i i7~~rs Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: Yes No. 2) Access to be limited to: 3) cress permit is require:'.. 4) a, edication ",-r ric1l,L is- required 4_1.~ JS' 1 ( 1-2 feet on Road, Street, hvenue. ) 10E - - b. Radius ( foot) is required. (On - and Poad , tree[, verve. ) c. ---Slope easement is required 5) Drainage Plan is required. on-site off-sits . 6) ~~~,4 trig Permit is required. feet on Road . ) 7) Curb is required, (along Road, Street, Avenue.) Sidewalk is required. (alone Road, S weer , :venue. ) 3) :'applicant must be willing to participate in future LID:-"'R1-.C 10) Legal description is acceptable as reviewed . Parcel No. 24N-2-- a L Comments: 3 i n:_ ZCNINTI- •v'V'DRKSFIET-continued-2 PART-II -to be completed by Sookane t- unty Utilities Department A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane Count, Utilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed developmentpis not located in a public sewer s ~r-.-ice area operated and maintained by Spokane. County. 2) A storm drainage plan i required for the proposal. Comments:- o / 3 IlAePL (Aww- 2 ' %o )igned Date PART_ III- to be completed by Spokane County Water Purveyor Water Suppl 1) The proposed development is located with the VLkA WA7Ek district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agreement/.arrangement 6&6ihas not been made to ser-Te this proposal 3) We are/avesovt able to supply this development with adequate -notable wa ter. 4) We are/ are~ able to supply this development with adequate for fire flow. 5) Water Purveyor is public , private community, private, other: 6) Water system 4w/is not under State Utilities jurisdiction. 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: inches. 8) Distance Co ma' C', feet . 121 ?a n it 5, IJ 1) Individual water supply will be developed with/without fire protection capabilities. Comments: Signed Date C. If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Department o« Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to application. 1) I/We have reviewed the proposal. It appears to meet State requirements for public Wa t-= r . icne,d ZONING WORKSHEET continued-3 s P.jRT ICJ - to be completed by Spokane County Fire ?Nlarshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District # 2) Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Fire flow 4 s no equate for proposed development and )is not required. 4) Main(s) need to be installed. 5) -5 Hydrant (s) need to be installed. 6) W3ter Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) 7) Nearest fire hydrant is feet. 8) Driving distance to nearest fire station is /J/ /ee Comments: J G ~ned Date! ' PART 11 - to be completed by Spokane County Health District A preliminary consultation meeting has been held •,vith the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal -appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: X septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; ;ther: Other methods considered were: 2) Air q Y ualit ~cW/is not a concern with this proposal. 3) Ground water quality-4r/is not a concern with this proposal. 4) Noisovis not 3 concern with this proposal. S) Light is/ ra concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: ttu - Y l~ 6711- A~ Signed D a to AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) R~'~ J. _&4" , Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at all times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on 19~~jj he personally Posted three (3) true + _1..1.+ and correct opies of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County, to-wit: Trlte~- 2. 3• Subscribed and sworn to me 6~p'& 0 191 N Y PUBLIC IN AND FOR POKANE COUNTY, WASHINGT N Residing at Spokane, Washington ZE_ / (~_79 y "+k - a + 1 ■ ~1 1 T AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON } ss. COUNTY OF SPOKANE } ~Ich-.___Dacis , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of The United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 1 years That on the 1 -day of r 19 i t T personally deposited in the United States mail at with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein b reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the day of . 19, who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) foot periphery of the applicant's controlled property. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to a those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference DATED this IJ Z6. day of , 19~. SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day of 19 , o ary Public in an for the State f Washington, residing at Spokane. APPLICATION NO. At said time and place, any interested person may appear, for or against, the granting of this application. AGENDA, SEPTEMBER 20, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Time: Thursday, September 20, 1979, 1:30 P.M. Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane ZONE RECLASSIFICATION 7. ZE-145-79, Agricultural to Restricted Industrial a. Location: Section 24 , Township 25 N . , Range 44 , E . W . M . The West 3 acres of the East 5 Acres of Tract 33, Vera, less right of way. b. Vicinity Location: South of Sprague Avenue, approximately 100 feet west of Conklin Road. C. Applicant: Willis Barker North 121 Best Road Spokane, WA 99216 d. Site Size: 2.52 Acres e. Existing Zoning: Agricultural, established March 27, 1942 f. Proposed Zoning: Restricted Industrial g. Proposed Use of Property: Retail shops/warehousing h. Application of Zoning Provision: Chapter 4.21, Section 4.21.040 i. Environmental Impact: A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-10-330(2) provides that: " In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E .I . S . shall be prepared." -7 - . _ 10 2 Jp 44 a 95 rsi ,9 fRiDGE a C-ATAL. 1( a AYE 5RojkDwAkY AVE 13 t# Fire R. ~r 1 . res;_ Oft f7 { EYW~ Yp.LL NAY F 0 W ti . 4 - - MAIIi AV 4 'v 9D r..j IX Y. l Q~vC, o1.9 A _ SPRAGUE AV u U a ENUE VE r ALE i G ►vt S f p+ p R R GCa w AYE PpfoG;lC C U6 z r,., ~~1 3 SRI' DGE ~M a r% ul ELI E NO 450 9 T o- ~e cobil4f ~ . a LAKE , 'AIDAM 7n, _ 7TH # 1 F 1,6: loo 0 ~q om, s r w~ r C PRE-APPLICATION E ;REyGLASSIFICATI0N' SPOKANE COUNTY Date: - ~ Application No: lJ Na,rne of Applicant: Street Address of Applicant: ~ I&- , Cit - - - State: Telephone No. y:_ eZip Code:',! - Exit ting Zoning Classification: - r u _ ~ate Ex. sting Zone Classification, Established: 3f2l qZ - ~'Exr_stn~ _ U se of Pro1p erty : P-Iro, 6,s,-e,d 'ZoneClassification: - - - - ~ - a ProSPo,,sed Use of Property: Legal Description of Property: _ ,1~e- • J I Section,: - Township: Range: 17 So, u!rc°e, o Legal : D. C-3 - - - - - - A°sses,soirs Parcel Number: (See T,ax Statement) CIO 2- ac M, Property Size: Z. /L. i.:r^^_..~i"~s "i~, r+.~•M"~.-i+~~i0. L~7_.~ d"_ iiSit~.~~. -`3n i:?....a _ v-.~ S.A .»:,S .ti-.. ,*y >sy : 7~ra..~...C, ',-.s? - 4e~. ~E_..c'1'c! r... _ .use:... _