Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-155-79
r e e y • SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Zone Reclassification Checklist Applicant's Name Address Telephone No-. Applicant's INITIALS PRE-APPLICATION FEE, ($10.00), RECEIPT NUMBER , (date) APPLICATION APPOINTMENT (date) (time) PART I ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP. fC~ ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership) ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION. ZONING WORKSHEET. L ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST. PLOT PLANS (5 blackline) - (setbacks, road frontage, square footage, open space). PLOT PLAN TO GRAPHICS (date) PHOTOS (8 x 10 and description) SIGNS (4' x 4') APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER a2 zad ( ate) TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS PART II NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPES, ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT (date) STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST ~p FINDINGS PREPARED (da te) POST SURROUNDING AREA (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED (date) MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) FINDINGS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PART III HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED MINUTES MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) SEPA's Notice of Action a • vA f 9w 11 ~G n 40 { Spokane Colmttr T i Planning Department CURRENT PLANNING April 13, 1987 BETTY WOLLAM: Per our phone conversation on Friday, April 10, 1987, please find enclosed the information and forms which we discussed pertaining to a Change of Conditions application. If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate to give me a call 4VSTE 5 9)-4,5p6-22 Gc~ I WSKI P. HO OBIO Zonin Administrator BROADWAYCWTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 PHONE 456.2205 ~TTry~ MAILED TO: Betty Wollam Westwood Corp. 3030 SW Moody Ave. Portland, Oregon 97201 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE SECTION 11.10.230(1) SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(l) Environmental Checklist File No. Purpose of Checklist: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with probable -significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. Instructions for Applicants: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. Use of checklist for nonproject proposals: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply". IN ADDITION, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS(Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively. A. BACKGROUND 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: 2. Name of Applicant: 3. Address and phone number of applicant or contact person: 4. Date checklist prepared: 5. Agency requesting checklist: 6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): 7. a. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal? If yes, explain. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) A. BACKGROUND (continued) 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. 10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. 11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. 12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information to a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site (s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit application related to this checklist. 13. Does the proposed action lie within the Aquifer Sensitive Area (ASA)? The General Sewer Service Area? The Priority Sewer Service Area9 The City of Spokane? (See: Spokane County's ASA Overlay Zone Atlas for boundaries). TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS Evaluation For Agency Use Only 1. EARTH a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)? C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. 0 SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS(continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construc- tion (for example, asphalt or buildings)? h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any: 2. AIR a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors industrial, wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed9 If any, generally describe and give approximate quantites if known. b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: 3. WATER a. Surface: (1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site including year- round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. (2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC A97-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only (3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from the surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. (4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general descrip- tion, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year flood plain9 If so, note location on the site plan. (6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. b. GROUND: (1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known. (2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sanitary waste treatment facility. Describe the general size of the system, the number of houses to be served (if applicable) or the number of persons the system(s) are expected to serve. (3) Describe any systems, other than those designed for the disposal of sanitary waste, installed for the purpose of discharging fluids below the ground surface (includes systems such as those for the disposal of storm water or drainage from floor drains). Describe the type of system, the amount of material to be disposed of through the system and the types of materials likely to be disposed of (including materials which may enter the system inadvertently through spills or as a result of fire fighting activities). (4) Will any chemicals (especially organic solvents or petroleum fuels) be stored in above ground or underground storage tanks? If so, what types and quantities of materials will be stored? SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only (5) What protective measures will be taken to insure that leaks or spills of any chemicals stored or used on site will not be allowed to percolate to ground water (this includes measures to keep chemicals out of disposal systems described in 3b(2) and 3b(3)? C. Water Runoff (including storm water): (1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. (2) Will any chemicals be stored, handled or used on the site in a location where a spill or leak will drain to surface or ground water or to a storm water disposal system discharging to surface or ground water9 (3) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any (if the proposed action lies within the Aquifer Sensitive Area be especially clear on explanations relating to facilities concerning Sections 3b(4), 3b(5), and 3c(2) of this checklist). 4. PLANTS a. Check or circle type of vegetation found on the site- deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other. evergreen tree- fir, cedar, pine, other. shrubs. grass. pasture. crop or grain. wet soil plants, cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other. water plants: water lilly, eelgrass, milfoil, other. other types of vegetation. b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only 5. ANIMALS a. Circle any birds and animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other: mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other: fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other: other. b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: 6. ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufac- turing, etc. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included In the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any: 7. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. (1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH (2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any: b. Noise: (1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment, operation, other? (2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site. (3) Proposed measure to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: 8. LAND AND SHORELINE USE a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. C. Describe any structures on the site. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, which? e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site9 h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify. I. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project? SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only J. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace? k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any: 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: 9. HOUSING a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income housing. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle,or low-income housing. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any: 10. AESTHETICS a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure (s), not including antennas, what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed7 b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed? C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: 11. LIGHT AND GLARE a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views? C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any: SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only 12. RECREATION a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediately vicinity' b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: 13. HISTORIC AND CULTURAL PRESERVATION a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for national, state, or local preserva- tion registers known to be on or next to the site9 If so, generally describe. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic archaeological, scientific or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any. 14. TRANSPORTATION a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. b. Is site currently served by public transit? If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate? d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. SPOKANE ENVIRONMENTAL ORDINANCE (WAC 197-11-960) Section 11.10.230(1) B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS (continued) Evaluation For Agency Use Only f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak would occur. S. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any: 15. PUBLIC SERVICES a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example. Fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any: 16. UTILITIES a. Circle utilities currently available at the site, electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. C. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, the agency may withdraw any determination of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance upon this checklist. Date, Proponent (Please Print or Type) Proponent: Address. Phone, Person completing form: Date: Phone. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist and other pertinent information, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no probable significant adverse impacts and recommends a determination of nonsignificance. B. Concludes that probable significant adverse environmental impacts do exist for the current proposal and recommends a mitigated deter- mination of nonsignificance with conditions. C. Concludes that there are probable significant adverse environmental impacts and recommends a determination of significance. FILING FEE - $75.00 =ile No. ZE-155-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER t A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on December 13 having been continued from the November 15, 1979 meeting, 1979, /and the members of the Committee present bung Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane Myers and xR xRxex&4x2xx4 Ted McCoury and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Pat Harper, representing the applicant, for a Zone Reclassification, Residential Office and Multiple Fam. Suburban to Com'l for the purpose of retail establishments. B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential , fire station, park and commercial. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with as of December 13, 1979. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal Wis not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regulation. 7. That the land in this area is suitable/coRtwji WNR for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 1 File No. ZE-155-79 8 That the proposed use is compatible/jy1Ro ?aMe with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed rWW4.XANYyO /disapproval/ x@S6*h of the proposed use. IU. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds/)dtacecscxrA0xkix) k the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. I'l. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the agenda item was originally heard by the Hearing Examiner Committee on November 15, 1979, and continued until December 13, 1979, to meet the b) compliance with Chapter 43.21C RCJ (State Environmental Policy Act). C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Tom Bracken for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be approved /5d®cmjx Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: k. That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non- significance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance. 2 r f. - File No. ZE-155-79 Motion by: Mrs. Myers Seconded by: Mr. McCoury Vote: Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairman ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: 3 STAFF REPORT DATE: D:E CEMBER 13, 1979 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-155-79 "CONTINUED" 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Tom Braken STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner REQUESTED ZONING: Commercial EXISTING ZONING: Residential Office and Multiple Family, established, 1971 PROPOSED USE: Retail establishments PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Herald Road II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 8 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is flat, contains several types of trees and is unkempt. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The neighborhood is in a transition from undeveloped land and single family homes to Commercial, south of Main Avenue; north of Main Avenue has been developing into multiple family residences. LAND USE: Site Undeveloped North Multiple Family East Fire station/Balfour Park West Undeveloped/single family South Fidelity Savings/Washington Trust/University City ZONING: North Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1939 East Residential Office, established, 1968 Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1939 West Residential Office, established, 1971 Multiple Family, established, 1965 South Commercial, established, 1961 1 --ZONE RECLASSIFICATI" NUMBER: ZE-155-79 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION. (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 0 NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 5 Total Square Feet Approximately 104,885 sq. ft. Percent of Coverage 29% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 story Retail - 89,540 @ 11200 = 447 Restaurant - 11, 385 @ 1/50 = 67 Office - 3,960 @ 1/400 = 10 PARKING REQUIRED: 524 PROVIDED: 525 Ill. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The request was originally scheduled for the October 18, 1979 hearing. It was continued until several environmental concerns were answered. The concerns were traffic generation, sewage disposal, and storm water. At the writing of this report only the traffic question had been addressed. The other two concerns have yet to be resolved between the applicants and the appropriate agencies. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 3. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Herald Road for right-of-way. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Main Avenue for right-of- way. 2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATICIV NUMBER: ZE-155-79 IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) 3. Applicant shall dedicate the right-of-way for the extension of Felts Road between Sprague Avenue and Main Avenue as directed by and as shown on the County Engineer's Plat Plan of the proposed development. 4. Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Herald Road and Main Avenue. 5. Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Felts Road and Main Avenue. 6. Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Herlad Road and Main Avenue. 8. Special: The construction of Felts Road; reconstruction of existing traffic islands on Sprague Avenue adjacent to the proposed site and modification to the existing traffic signal at Sprague and Felts Road Extension shall be completed by the developer in cooperation with and as directed by the Spokane County Engineer. 9. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 10. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they are able to supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 3 ZONE RECLASSIEICATI"N NUMBER: ZE-155-79 2. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final- declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. Approval b the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance band for the project prior to release of building permits. The maintenance shall include an irrigation system for the land- scaping. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance, The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall work with the Health Department and 208 staff to resolve. The concerns of sewage disposal and storm water treatment and disposal. 4 1 File # =1'5,5-79 ~ , • jai ' bi,~w ~ .~i~ ~~+~ifi,~•.~s - - - _ a Sec . 17 T' s h' p 25 N R' g,e R0&F~FtoComrl ~ Classification Proponent Tory Bra ken SPOK.%NZ COU14TiY COURT HOUSE S P O ~K A N ~E C 0 U Ni T Y STAFF REVIEW-OF E,NIVIR,ONJMEN 7,AL_ C_H'ECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Envii'ronmental Ordinance and WAC 197-110; an Environmental Checklist has, been submitted by the app6iicant or his agent. Tihlis checklist and, any addiitional pertinent data has subbse,,- quiently been reviewed by the, 7a j_n~, r~~il artrn~n The, following data briefly descrites the, proposal: A. Actions(s) Requested: Zone Change X - Preliminary Plat Approval Final Plat Approval ; Change of Condition - - Other B. Description of Proposal: ,onstr,_-ct_a_s,,a-1-1 shoppiing fn on _a \a 6htt C. Location of Proposal: iN E. corner of Sprague Ayenue and Herald ,Road, (F 10127 5-S prague- Au,& 4-- - (Acro s.s_.,ram=I . City - C-r-esceint ) H. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) x Earth ('8) --X-- La_n,,d Use (15) x ~Ene,rg"Y (2) x_ Air (9) J NatUral (16) x Utilities, tResaurces (3) X Water (10) _ Ri,slkof upset (17) H, u,rnan - He eask0h , (4) x- Flora (111) _ Populat11 on (18) X Aesthet I cs (5~) x Fauna 1(12) Housing (191) -x_- - R ecreat1-on: (6~), x Noise (13) _ X Trans/Circ (201) Arch/H"iAt (7) --x Light/Glare (14) Public (21) Other 5,erv i.ce{s, B. Pote"ntia'llly significant adverse trnupeets aLr_e noted under the fofil;owirg questions: 3. _Water ipacteLy- 1L.6 113. Transportation/lC rculatilon 16. Sewage disposal and stumm-ater drainage Revised 6/1/79 _ r C . Uiscuss- ion of im acts identified above: ~ G p Project i s- lta-rgest s~i n 1 e yrs.i to shopp :n - - - , - u - area -i-n Spgkane -County in recent history, excepr,g Valley Mall`andyr''H'a,nson - - - - a-. shopping-center -proposal s. Site design indicates parking far 500 autos with only ingress ands egress from and onto Sprague, Awe°nuels- westbound curbsijide - traffis -1 ane (a ba-rri=er- exists to eastbound tr~av~e~~~ Most of traflf lic is - stated to be associated with, shopping locations _ex'stfing on south,siydle-of. Sprague. The potential for traffic congestion$ a`nd hazards, is- great y,_ s Project sponsorhas to date not provided detail=s %uff ci.ent to M, t 'f staff, concerts. Applicant has not to date responded-to "Add tional 1nfor_mot19ri" pursuant to WAC 197-20-330. -(cont-i nnued . on attached' page) III. Conclusions and Recommendations: y Based on this staff review of the environmental checlkllist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentira,fly significant a,idlver'se - - - fimpacts and recommends/issues a proposed -declaration of-non- significance. r, B. Concludes that there are no poten4tialty, ssignificant adver~ - impacts and, because of the nature-of the proposal, recom- mends/issues a, final declaration of pons-ioflficance. C. X Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts ;do - _ exist and recommends/issues a decla_rationi, of- IV. gnifi~carice.. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: a Revised 6/1/79 SPOKANE COUNTY STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST II. Review of Checklist (contd.) C. Discussion of impacts identified above: (contd.) Staff has two major on-site concerns with present proposal. No provision has apparently been made to dispose of stormwater in a manner which will minimize addition of substantial pollutants to the aquifer. No details are available for disposal of sewage in a manner consistent with minimizing impact on the aquifer. The applicant has not to date responded to staff requests for additional information pursuant to WAC 197-10-330. Lacking such information, the staff must operate on information available to date and recommend to the Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to WAC 197-10-060 and 360, that the impacts of the proposal, both direct and indirect, are still in doubt, and there exists a reasonable belief that the proposal could have a significant adverse impact on the physical environment. Consequently, a Declaration of Significance and an E.I.S. are recommended to the Hearing Examiner Committee. r - . t AGENDA, DECEMBER 13, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS CONTINUED 1. ZE-155-79 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO 1 COMMERCIAL (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Herald Road. Section 17-25-44) Proposed Use: Retail Establishments Applicant: BRACKEN (8 Acres) B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 2. ZN-190-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (Boston Road, east side, 360 feet north of Handy Road. Section 23=27-43) Proposed.Use: Four Residential Mobile Home Sites Applicant: CLOUGH (6.13 Acres) 3: ZE-227-79 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Southeast corner of Park Road and Utah Avenue. Section 7-25-44) Proposed Use: Real Estate Office Applicant: SPOKANE COUNTY LIBRARY (.24 Acres) 4. ZN-226-79 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS AND/OR RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Division Street, west side, 300 feet north of Graves Road. Section 18-26-43) Proposed Use: Professional Offices/Commercial Uses Applicant: L B J INVESTMENTS (.94 Acres) 5. ZE-170-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Fourth Avenue, no,rth side, 800 feet east of Sullivan Road. Section 24-25-44) Proposed Use: 92 Unit Apartment Complex Applicant: WEST (4.29 Acres) 12:00 NOON - - - - - • LUNCH (Place to be announced at the Hearing) 1:30 P.M. RECONVENE C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 6. ZN-213-79 AGRICULTURAL TO COMMERCIAL (Highway #395, east side, 1 , 760 feet south of Wi,,l d Rose Road. Section 6-27-43) Proposed Use: Convenience Store and Service Station Applicant: MORGAN (4.21 Acres) (contd.) - it 1. OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON p November 8 19 79 Inter-office Communication To Zonigg Administrator Fro m County 8ngineer Subject ZE 155-79 Special: The construction of Felts Road= re-construction of existing traffic islands on Sprague Avenue adjacent to the proposed site and modification to the existing traffic signal at Sprague and Felts Road Extension shall be completed by the developer in cooperation with and as directed by the Spokane County Engineer. #19 ,p. #20 Form 327-C R r®FPICE OF COUNTY ENG ER SPOKANE COVNTY, WASHINGTOM p "November 8 1979 Inter-office Communication To Inning A ini9trater from - C linty Fnainepr Sub fact ZE 1$5-79 1 - 5' on Herald Road 7. # 1 - 10' on Main Avenue Applicant shall dedicate the right of way for the extension of Felts Road between Sprague-Avenue and Main~Avenue as directed by and as shown on the County Engineer's Plat Plan of the proposed development. 4 # 3 - 20' radius on Herald Road and Main Avenue S• # 3 - 20' radius on Felts Road and Main Avenue # 5 7 #15 - Herald Road and Main Avenue (continued) Form 327-C.R. OF CE OF COUNTY ENGI EER SPOKANE COUNTY* WASHINGTON pate October 4 Inter-office Communication Is Zoning Administrator Fiom ' County Engineer Subject ZE 155-79 Applicant ahall dedicate 5 feet on Herald, 10 feet on. Main, 25 to 40 feet on Fe=lts Road as per approved design and 20 foot radii on all four corners of the advertised property. #5 x`15 lain Avenue and on Herald Road That portion of 4 foot sidewalk on Sprague Avenue shall be widened to 6 feet Improvements to Felts Road shall include curbs, sidewalk, 30 feet paving and drainage. #19 The cost of traffic island and traffic signal modifications on Sprague Avenue made necessary by this development shall be the responsibility of the developer. Form 327-C.R, s' J 5POI~ANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTPIENT ~&xwz& &&w* 7a& ,a 6A.- I EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 Ila December 3, L979 Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator Broadway Centre Building t Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone chap s have been reviewed for fire protection: ZE-lSS-79 Bracken ZE-227-79 Spokane ~ount► Lib a y f ZE-170-79 West ZE-231-79 Stage me e y ZE- 22 8- 79 c is The above e e,~ rn=a+~ s a draots to be installed. Access p1ans fox "re• e`Cag1 mentaround the building shall bef a ~row,ed/pr' o o uildin perm t issuance. p y r T -''A o Lt. of In ecto A• : s n .01 - 11604-0 D DEC 6 SPOKANE COUNT PIANNiNG WOMEN' PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES ~J N-77~:IPA D 7cx~~-:72~~Ir -rA 21 Ain ` FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE ` u •°'~t N. 811 Jefferson Z 456-5786 1 11 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 November 14, 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY GOURC 11oUSE TO: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONE RECLASS~ FICATIONS: ZN50-79, ZE-151-79, ZE-163-79, BW-101-79, ZE-189-79, ZN-2-57, ZW-186-79, ZE-116-79, ZE-158-79, ZE-119-792 ZN-128-79, ZE-159-79 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A plot plan showing property use and development is required, A plot plan showing property use and development in relationship to water for fire flow must be submitted for approval prior to land use or development. LD/ba R F CP E E D N O V JA 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT File # Sec . i ~r T'sh'p R'ge ,.L a ' Classification Rn 11? ~ 1~KL"X Proponent 7'D -t! Be,4~EAl MOP= SPOKANE COUNfv COURT NUUSC A" 1; I - T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N l7/ " Z_ DECLARATION OF S/GAV/F1C 4A)C,~. (proposed/final) (significance/non-significance) 1. Description of Proposal: g t ,¢,-zd= "MA'1EQC 1AZ- [7~ UELO~M~~% CAI ,44 7`f> N0127-R .5 /OE OF SPe,4GU E . , 61-- CZr- SC,&,, r X-7- 0. CITY. ,of 2. Proponent: ~0M 23~e,4kE^/ 3. Contact Person: 7EAeA y ~-1 77- Phone: 9 - `7 z5-S- 4. County Action(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Other: 5. Location of Proposal: /Y. C- - C6ex--' .o,," 0iG ,~~AP~ G-v & 4A~O 256=-,p,,¢-'-0 ;i~Q,*Q (Ae~ /0--2 79- S RO 4 G-v~ff X PAVE 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is required under RCW 43.21 C .030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the 'Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Nam Name Signature Signature Title Title C ,,tl e,ol~41V Department Department # ''~W, C-O/V Date Date OG7ToBri~, /g, M7`j over Revised 6/1/79 8. For Declaration of Significance Only: /I / Date of Expected Draft EIS Available (determined by Responsible Official) / Date of Issuance TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: a. Brief description and listing of those environmental impacts leading to such declaration. T •v?'~4 ~ UNk.uow ~vt ,9-~rs ,aUr= Td ~~~.~s,ao T~4rio~cJ c/~cu~.4r~ov, 4A1,0 /AIPACTS ZQ4E s w,4 .his ~o,S,4 z-nro sa l cU ~vyo~z 14S T F~ ,4F~ CT T ~t QU ! FE.~. SL Sr•¢~~ 1~F V & W) . b. Brief explanation of what measures, if any, could be taken by the applicant to prevent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of non-significance. (D A? C- /v 7-- IAI ;r-)e /AIC ~Pa 4- IUD/ (2b UAr ry E Nd:-1A1aE RC o4S ro ' /`/~CESS, ieY prS 1C.A) !4L ~.~4r/dNS TD ! NC / ~,4 L w ~ zo8 S7- vo y ® r¢G~~c A? e U T ~ Al eD G-4e!v7+/ c y a_o~c e ie ov1_-D W tom` l.vA~S T L~Jr~rZ)1S P6Sy4L 4S -ro )YES E SSAR Y AS6~t/ FJ=_ 47- U.c. ~-S -/-C> C aC-) W /7-ff r4PPPa )c F%7Df4A?CA144-)-16NS ©iv- L-'-2o V Sf~O ~C.4 ~tJ J1i4 LLB y A144 IV A 4Z ~1 ^I Cr oe_J r 117f , ~410 AS 7_11,C-74E 4,"re-e- .4 L.r&.oeAMp 61C OKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Comfnunication Date: November 14, 1979 TO: Spokane County Planning - Zoning Adjustor FROM: Dennis Kroll, R.S. I ~ SUBJECT: University Shopping Mall - North side of Sprague - between Herald and Felts ree - - - A review of the concept plans for subject proposal did not reveal any unique features which would not allow conventional on-site septic tank and drainfield treatment and disposal methods for the project. The topography and soils of the area are suitable for on- site drainfield systems. slc c: Diversified Planning and Development Co. * e'r 4i 4*1 o, I/ I- kle ~FPq~ ryjY l~~yl SCHD-ADM--11 • : A ',tip ~jP "~r . ► • 1L• ~ :ems. i , ~ ~ . ''i-` - PLANNING DEPARTMENT 9ROAOWAY CENTRE'SUIIOING N, 721 JEFFERSON STREET i PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKAN[ COUNVY COWn' HOUSE File # ZE-155-79, Section 17 Township 25 Range 44 Classification RESIDENTIAL OFFICE & MULTIPLE FAMI=LY SUBU,RBAN TO COMMERCIAL Proponent Tom Bracken T H R E S H O L.D D E T E R M I N A T I O N ._ROPOSED/1OfNAL DECLARATION' OF SI:GNIF'ICANC.E/WON-SIGNIFICANCE 1. Description of Proposal: Eight ;(8) acre shopping center with approximately 110,000 sq. ft. of gross leasable floor space. 2. Proponent: Torn, Bracken 3. Contact Person: Jerry Litt Phone: 922-4355 4. County Action Requested: Zone Reclassification 5. Location of Proposal: Directly north of the Crescent- at University City,,, north of Sprague Avenue, between Herald Road and Balfour Park, south of Main Avenue. 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS :is 'not required under kCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed' environ- mental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7: Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name Fred L. Dayharsh Name Chairmai VLD6W L* T#f S Signatur Signature Title Director Title Chairman Department Spokane, County Planning Dept. Department Hearing Examiner Committee Date November 28, 1979 Date December 12, 1979 'Revised 611 /7 1' I P341 T1. PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY tI NTRE BUILDING N, 721. JEFFERSON -STREET PHONE 456-226S i y SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 9926fl -r~SPOKAgE tOUKf1Y COttRT ltOUSC CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO'-. 1. Department of Ecology, 6. Modern, E1 ectri c Water Company 2. Department of Social and 7• Audubon Society Hea-l'th Services - 3. Spokane County Health District & Interoffice 4. SCAPCA 9• Interoffice 5. Fire- D'istrict -#1 10. FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 `(509) 456-2205 Attention : Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, _Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, neap; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 191-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: ZE-1`55-79. This determination was made in accordance with, 'WAC 197-10-2200- Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to be either an Interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as- provided in WAC 197-10-340 (S), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was Issued on November 28, 1979. Please respond, If appropriate, on or before December 12, 1979. The subject proposal or, action IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel ' an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS-) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GWIE) should be prepared. A public hearing has been tentatively, scheduled for December 13, 1979, to be held in Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. Enclosures Revised 6/1/79 9~, File # Z~ - /SS - 79 1 . ~d Sec. -Twp .-Rg e . ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971. Chapter 43.21C. RC'W. requires all state and local governmental agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely". as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to hlep the agencies in- volved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be aware of and concern themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. 'there explanations of your answers are required, or where you breve an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional cages. if necessary You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions new will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnecessary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the pro- oosal for whi-ch approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed. even though cMI etion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies wnich will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. Sta,te__)aw.requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required'to provide explanations for no" answers, and in some cases, more detai ed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply. just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: o »a 1RraG kc H V• ve r, 5'o _ P/c-74N . M, Phone Number q De Co as t 8 3 .4 2. Address of Proponent: C 9 A11 5, c JsP2 Labe 9920 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: - - .~"M- - Name of Proposal, if Applicable: 6. Nature and grief Description of the Proposal (including gut not imit"ea to its size enera design e►en+ents, Ana other factors that -ri l l give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature) : Y_a c r e 60r» vn~eV-Q a //0000 e /e r 1. Location of P bsal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, includin any other info 4 needed to give an accurate un erstanding of the enviy on- mental setting of the proposal): ,,v a v, e A el a 1~ a ls2t., r SI o /L1 a r"K .4✓e r1 r~ .~so L V,r'O6C I•.. r'O r+, e-5 W1_ ryt ( e I'S t ~A% l o~ D f s- w 1'. ~f 45f mss. mC _ 3. Estimated Date for Comoletion of the Prooo al: 9. List of all Permits. Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Proposal (federal. state and local - inc'-.uding rezones):e7 DrL•~DOropc3l ~~eeSS ~cr►y►i`~s J84P_ 7101siaol Pe'r ^,t` _5 _y4bry1ri 9;11( (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes. explain: 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: 0- 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: A~ - 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed recirdino the proposal, if none nas been comoleteo, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: _y /A II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" ands"maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe yo 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) 'Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . . _ (b) Disruptions. displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? . . . . Ix _ (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? . . . • • • • • • - -Z (d) The destruction. covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . • • • • • • . . - (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, either on or off the site? . . . . . _ X (IF SPACr EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, ?LEASE ATTACH ADDIT PAGES.) (f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands. or cnanges in siltation, deposition or erosion whicn may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay. inlet or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . - Explanation: Dt.t r r- 10 in "A' t o K C e v t LL CL~ a h 1O( vet rdor" -5 zr rPvnOV~I ~..1 ► 20 ke ~Igc-Tl,e SITC 1S wJT`~ Ko % 2. Air. will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . . . . . . . • • • -P- (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . • • • • • • • • • • - (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate. either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: n L, Cab, c47 Y 'o 0- C' q 1 4- 1' v V." ru_X [ , r s 1 5 -Fe,.,.aoo r~►.- s r'[~,a f "io fa 6 e. co r o Ilea tI'-d Kj8r Cd kS truc~~O~+ OwTrO'S 3. 'dater. Will the proposal result in: ves Ma_;be N°- (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water mover:ents, in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters. or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . k (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? . . . . . . . . . . _ (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? . . . . . . . . - (g) Charge in the quantity of gound waters, nigher through direct additions or witharawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (h) Deterioration in ground water quality. either throuan direct infection, or through the seeoage of leachate, phospates, detergents, waterborne virus or bacteria. or other substances into into the gound waters? . . . . . . • • • . • • • • • • • • . (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for X public water supplies? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanation: Loo v :1 n.0 k.) a w cy:g S ~l a r a So 4 L..; g4r- 174;z If 0 s [ S c .S o G tt ~ r 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or nu per of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs. grass, cross, microflara and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (b) Red-action of the numbers of any unique, rare or enoangered " species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r 3 (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . . . . . . ~C (d) Reduction in acreage of any agriculturai crop? : . . . . . . . . . Explanation: ~ r St i L.4Y,Vr- ~ ~ ou r edl 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species. or number of any species of fauna (birds. land animals including reptiles, fisn and shellfish. benthic organisms, insects or microfatna)? . . . . • • • • • • _ (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (c) Introduction of new species of raura into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . X Sxpianation• a u[..-• QY tr S 7 4 Y, 01-2 ge e7 i roS.t L°-Darr~W.s 6. Noise. Yes "ayoe 110 (a) Will the pro osal increase existing noise levels? . . . . . . . . . . -I& Explanation: [mac C r r e lee/s. - 7. Licht and Glare. Yes Naybe do (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? . . . . . . . . • • • • • • e ~ Exolanation: "el cc ~ (a S5 S L r. s *CPL 1,7z> 1, e l g L~~ Q l re es L~rl f c_f l~ l t u1.4 az d or 0 2. ~ w (IF 0,FFOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACH 0MONAL PAGES:] S. and use. Yes a No (a) will the proposal result in the alteration' of the presant or planned land Use Hof an'area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,Explanation : "i e- :5 *.rnn, P-Ra 14- ra a n a)y4 gmall 9. Natural Resources.' WTI the proposal result in:. Yes maybe. .40 (a) Increase in the rate of use of any,natural resources?• . . . . , . . . . • • • _ IL (b) Oepletjon of any,nonrenewsole Raturnal resource? . . . . . . • • • • _ Expla_ n_„ahon: 10. Risk of Uoset. Does the proposal idV61ve-a resk of an expl&ion or the Yes. MaYile No release o hazardous, substances (including. but not' lirpitea to, oil ,pestieiQes: chemicals. or radiation) in the event of an-accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Exol~ - 11. Population Yes Maybe No Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: M. Housin . will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional' housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: sta. be Nom. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Mill the proposal result 1n: Yes (a)' Generation: of additional vehicular movement! . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Effects on existing parking facilities,, or demand for new parking? . . . . . . . _ ('c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? . . . . (e) Alterations to watereorne, rail, or air traffic?~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ increase in traffic hazards to rotor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: ~r3 r e r I• C44 IFA oS CE o r• ~--T; 7LC r •t'1 1. C• ft [ r r t G w e 12 14. Public Services. Mill the proposal have an effect upon, or result Yes Iftybe No in ,a need for~new or altered govergwntai services in any of of the following areas: (a) Fire Protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JL (b) Police,protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Schools?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other recreational facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Other govermn_m gal Services? . . . . . je - cxplanation:- - E'kt e E r. G. L o tA r, A &I 1 t, e. L L4 c .C0• (IF SPAN FOR EXPLANATION IS MOEQ T,E, p1.EASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) IS. Enem Will the ptoposal result in: Yea !!a a Yo (a)' use of, substantlai C-Munts of fuel or energy? . . . . . . . • • • • . • • (b) Demand anon existing sources ofler91+, or require ite development of nor sources of energy? . • . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: "Se 1 L~ re? 4 a c(~' Q ~ s 16. Utilities. Will the proposal, result in a need for qea "systems. Yes Mavbe No or altiration's to the follow4g utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Cq=bnication s~'sdw? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . jr- _ (c)- Aatbr? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . s. - (dl Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A (e1! Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ 3 (IF ` FOR EXPLANATION 1S MAQEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ORAL PAGES.) (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: A/I f 6-5G S~ v ccCS .v e Yes t Ube No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)? . . . . . . . Exolanation• 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view pen view the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanation• f~ esc_S ck! e.._A o..` rr i LQ .5 +P ~r ~,-c i ~QZr t,L.. S' G'S oZre L-0 tt U le W wpaJ.~ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the qual;ty or quanta of existing recreational opportu sties? . . . . . . _ B~r Exclamation: 2 g-- c> LA, Y' 20. Arcneological Historical. Will the oroposal result in an alteration of a Yes Mavbe No significant arcneo ogical or historical site, structure. object or buildino? . . . . . . , Explanation: SICNMATURE I. the undersigned, swear under the oenalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand mat, should there be any willful misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part.Spokane County may withdraw any declaration of nonsiam ficance that it night issue in reliance upon this checklist. Pate: 7 7 cf Proponent: e per j l~rac-~.~►~- (Please Print or Type) Proponent: ~tho7-_ Address: ra2 w e - Phone: <iZd G S ys~l - ~'b Ay Person comoleting form: Phone: M Z - y35 S Gate: 7 / Z - 7 9 Gepartrent or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: gZaWIM& Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: 41 r 'ile No. ZE-155-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 15, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane Myers, and Ted McCoury and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Pat Harper, representing applicant; Bill Wright, Engineer and Tom Bracken for a Zone Reclassification, Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban to Commercial for the purpose of retail establishments. B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have not been complied with as of the date of the hearing, accordingly no 'action' can be taken until such provisions have been complied with. 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Tom Bracken for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be continued to the December 13, 1979 hearing agenda of the Committee as the first item on the agenda at 9:00 a.m. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: Only testimony pertaining to the Environmental Checklist and responses thereto by agencies of jurisdiction will be allowed at the December hearing. 1 'ile No. ZE-155-79 Motion by: Myers Seconded by: McCoury Vote: Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairman ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: 2 o r - BOO NE AV r M. F Z'; W ~ It ,Df ti.-C 0 4 r► _ jcx) DESMFrT s ILATALD I: Z r G3 o A D[~►~ i hAALLnpj z < 1 a I cLit ~ Q 2 0 i` SR AY 3 " 17 li Q+ ~ Q j R N I ~ a 1 t' ALKI I Af_K I A W ° Q o o V 55w79 to Ill- i5i'll Pot a Lek too twml 0 L LE WAY Sic AEY ,p N ON NI XON W r t V Q a I F J t z I• IL 2 p c ot a 0 Q W ►,iy o nr AIN z 0 MAIN F MAIN dAVE AIN H4 Z z J J t N - U ; 1 QRIVfRS,DC I: 'vtRS.oe - 1' ICE 77t- a s RIvE 0 ( 2 w - 4 3 x R ! Z ~•IEL.,9e • u> o L .1993 Pill PO S K A SPR AGUE NQ 2 312f \ J Z AV pe ono ~ TM1 p. MILWAUKEE RAILROAD a rd f - z FoQQTH AV F- FOURTH AV T.. AV E W cr I s 0 z 0 0 of car r M t: 1 z - k: G S I A T H > > 4 7 Q0 0- 7T0" SEtiEr~1M ' El ISMM r+ ; AVE t3 'T iv P T" avE. M , 11 ' ' i ` MI 9TH ~ T N 1 a Y!p A1' t . _ 1 Iha 1 p ' .1' to Tn IC I r i • :ii 10 PC z ' l i' 1 :1000 ♦ r i - , ;lei ( : , o r'x~ E DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION TELEPHONE 456-4730 q t WEST 1115 BROADWAY AVENUE ,u 7L d `J10' SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE November 14, 1979 Mr. Pat Harper Diversified Planning & Development Consultants E. 9822 Sprague Spokane, WA 99206 Dear Mr. Harper: In reference to your November 13, 1979 letter, I concur with your proposal. My understanding is that the playground cost will be approximately $5,000.00, and the developer will assume responsibility to put up a 6' slatted fence with a l' riser along the west edge of Balfour Park. In return, we will recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that we'donate approximately 10' of right of way towards Felts Road. We have studied the proposed zoning and plans and concur with both. S' cerely, RT D. ANG Park & Recre t'on Director 51)01~ANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTIAENT 4;&1"' 7" ,ate 619 EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. * SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 a4 le /z~~' 744e, ele~l' November 14, 1979 Spokane County Hearing Examiner Board N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington To Whom It Play Concern: Reference: ZE-155-79 I have reviewed this proposed zone change and see no problems with it as presented. Sincerely, 6 u g R i d Fire Ch i, DR:sn PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES I' AGENDA, NOVEMBER 15, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS CONTINUED 1. ZN- 50-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (Hamilton Road and Highway #395) Proposed Use: Mobile Home Park Applicant: HOUGHTALING (20.5 Acres) 2. ZE-155-79 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO COMMERCIAL (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Herald Road) Proposed Use: Retail Applicant: BRACKEN (8 Acres) B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 3. ZN-128-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Hastings Road, 300 feet East of State Highway #395) Proposed Use: Veterinary Clinic/Office Applicant: SLACK - (.6 Acres) 4. ZE-163-79 AGRICULTURAL/TRANSIENT LIVING TO COMMERCIAL (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Flora Road) Proposed Use: No proposal at this time. Applicant: HITCHCOCK (14.4 Acres) 5. ZW-101-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Thorpe Road, 300 feet East of Kenyon Road, extended North) Proposed Use: Restricted Industrial Uses Applicant: SCHULTZ (33.28 Acres) 12:00 NOON - - - - - LUNCH (Place to be announced at the Hearing) 1:30 P.M. RECONVENE C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 6. ZE-189-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Nora Avenue, approximately 800 feet East of Pines Road) Proposed Use: No proposal at this time. Applicant: MEDICUS (8.5 Acres) 7. ZN- 2-57 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS - LOCAL BUSINESS (Southeast corner of Country Homes Blvd. and Wall Street) Proposed Use: Professional Office/Retail Shops Applicant: NORTHWOOD PROPERTIES (5.42 Acres) (contd.) BRACKEN PROJECT RETAIL A & B Buildings 89,540 Total square feet 1 parking space per 200 feet of gross floor area 447 spaces RESTAURANT C & D Buildings 11,385 Total square feet 1 parking space per 50 square feet of service area 3350 service area 67 spaces If used for retail 57 spaces BANK E Building 3,960 Total square feet 1 parking space per 400 feet of gross floor area 10 spaces 5POI~ANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPAR`ITI`'LENT s e&&4 7",e- ,a &4 / EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 C~ TTa~P Y5e ei~ November 6, 1979 Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone changes have been reviewed for fire protection: sc~- 155-79 Bracken ZE-163-79 Hitchcock ZE-189-79 Medicus ZE-116- 79 Haffner ZE-158-79 Shogren ZE-159-79 Renner ZE-119-79 Fogg Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefiqhting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 65~k Al 'Coo k Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn S901KAHE DOWN TY ptANNING DEPAR PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES WL" A/, M" ky K e FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson 456-5786 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 - October 31, 1979 SHOKANC COUNTY COURT HOUSC a TO: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONES RECLASSIFICATIONS Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. November 6, 1979 Hearing: ZW-85-79 ZN-179-79 ZW-178-79 ZN-180-79 ZN-125-79 ZE-65-79 ZE-157-79 ZE-194-79 ZE-216-79 ZE-94-71 November 15, 1979 Hearing: ZN-50-79 ZE-155-79 AN-128-79 ZE-163-79 R E ZW-101-79 C, E ZE-189-79 ZN2-79 NOV 1979 ZW 186-79 ZE-116-79 SPOKANE COUNTY ZE-158-79 PIANN1NG DEPART ZE-159-79 DEPARTMENT ZN-134-79 LD/ba 5 STAFF REPORT DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1979 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-155-79 "CONTINUED" 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Tom Braken STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner REQUESTED ZONING: Commercial EXISTING ZONING: Residential Office and Multiple Family, established, 1971 PROPOSED USE: Retail establishments PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Herald Road II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 8 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is flat, contains several types of trees and is unkempt. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The neighborhood is in a transition from undeveloped land and single family homes to Commercial, south of Main Avenue; north of Main Avenue has been developing into multiple family residences. LAND USE: Site Undeveloped North Multiple Family East Fire station/Balfour Park West Undeveloped/single family South Fidelity Savings/Washington Trust/University C ity ZONING: North Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1939 East Residential Office, established, 1968 Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1939 West Residential Office, established, 1971 Multiple Family, established, 1965 South Commercial, established, 1961 1 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIO r DUMBER: ZE-155-79 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 0 NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 5 Total Square Feet Approximately 104,885 sq. ft. Percent of Coverage 290 MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 story Retail - 89,540 @ 11200 = 447 Restaurant - 11 , 385 @ 1/50 = 67 Office - 3,960 @ 1/400 = 10 PARKING REQUIRED: 524 PROVIDED: 525 III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The request was originally scheduled for the October 18, 1979 hearing. It was continued until several environmental concerns were answered. The concerns were traffic generation, sewage disposal, and storm water. At the writing of this report only the traffic question had been addressed. The other two concerns have yet to be resolved between the applicants and the appropriate agencies. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the bLiilding shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 3. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Herald Road for right-of-way. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Main Avenue for right-of- way. 2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIC NUMBER: ZE-155-79 IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) 3. Applicant shall dedicate the right-of-way for the extension -of Felts Road between Sprague Avenue and Main Avenue as directed by and as shown on the County Engineer's Plat Plan of the proposed development. 4. Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Herald Road and Main Avenue. 5. Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Felts Road and Main Avenue. 6. Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Herlad Road and Main Avenue. 8. Special: The construction of Felts Road; reconstruction of existing traffic islands on Sprague Avenue adjacent to the proposed site and modification to the existing traffic signal at Sprague and Felts Road Extension shall be completed by the developer in cooperation with and as directed by the Spokane County Engineer. 9. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 10. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they are able to supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 3 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIC DUMBER: ZE-155-79 2. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. The maintenance shall include an irrigation system for the land- scaping. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall work with the Health Department and 208 staff to resolve. The concerns of sewage disposal and storm water treatment and disposal. 4 ^-,+":ile No. ZE-155-79 1 ~ SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on October 22, 1979, and the members of the Committee present being Ted McCoury, Acting Chairman, Jane Myers, and Paul Sceva, Jr.., and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; NONE for a Zone Reclassification, Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban to Commercial for the purpose of retail uses. B. _DINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Residential Office and Multiple Family Suburban. 2. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 3. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) The Planning Department staff has requested the applicant submit additional information regarding environmental concerns after review of the Environmental Checklist. C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Tom Bracken for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be continued to the November 15 hearing of the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. 1 =ile No. ZE-155-79 Motion by: Myers Seconded by: Sceva, Jr. Vote: Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE G 011airman ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director Q By: 2 DIVERSI' _D PLANNING & DEW OPMENT CONSULTANTS East 9822 Sprague Avenue • Suite No. 51 • Spokane, Wa. 99206 ® 1 (509) 922-4355 October S, 1979 Hearing Examiner Committee c/o Marsha Reines, Zoning Administrator_ Dear Marsha, Please accept and present this proposal to postpone our hearing from the October_ Zoning Hearing Examiner Comm- ittee to the November Zoning Hearing Examiner Meeting. It was found that in reviewing the environmental checklist, several questions needed to be resolved, these questions can be answered by special studies which we are now con- ducting. Because of the relatively short time before the hear- ing that we were notified of the problems, it was impossible to accomplish the studies in a professional manner and there- fore the reason why, today, we are asking for a months' delay. We can assure the Committee there will be no need for a further delay extending from the above circumstances when the November meeting is held. Should any other questions arise, a representative from Diversified Planning Development Consultants will be at the Public Hearing. Respectfully Yours, Pat Harper Consultant PH/gj In regards to Bracken project ZE- 155-79 Residential Office and MFS. to Commercial zone change. 5POIKANE VALLEq FIRE DEPARTIAENT EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 October 4, 1979 ♦Marcia Raines ' Zoning Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission 'N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone changes XaVe been reviewed for fire protection: ZE-51-74 Erickson ` ZE-155- 79 Braken ZE-174-79 Picken f ZE-167-79 Wagstaff rte, ZE-119- 79 Fogg ZE-209-79 Pugh Mains and hydrakis ',need to 666 'fli~6611 ed in , the above • areas . Access plans for'f0e-fl•ghfing ecru' r i+en'~'S~round the buil-ding, shall be approved r i o r to b ul d i r g p e m i ,f i s s~`u~~~'t~ic*e P , ZE-94-.Y1 ' Ner'fire prote ti..n° "requ'ire nt"',,"e6dA, Al Cook Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn E C E 11 E TAU 197 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES STAFF REPORT DATE: OCTOBER 18, 1979 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-155-79 The applicant has requested postponement for consideration of his application to the November hearing of the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee. m AGENDA, OCTOBER 18, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE (contd.) Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane (Morning session commenced at 9:00 A.M.) 1:30 P.M. C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 8. ZE-155-79 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO COMMERCIAL (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Herald Road) Proposed Use: Retail Applicant: BRAKEN 9. ZE-174-79 AGRICULTURAL TO COMMERCIAL (South Sprague Avenue, 500 feet west of Progress Road) Proposed Use: Retail Shops and Services Applicant: PICKEN 10. ZE-167-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Approximately 1,200 feet south of Trent Road-at Flora Road) Proposed Use: Warehouse and Offices Applicant: WAGSTAFF 11. ZE-119-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Northeast corner of Trent Road and Sullivan Road) Proposed Use: Retail, Wholesale, Warehousing Applicant: FOGG 12. ZE-209-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MANUFACTURING (Northeast corner of Cataldo Avenue and Yardley Street) Proposed Use: Contractor's Office and Storage Applicant: PUGH 13. ZE- 94-71 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS (East of Barker Road on Cataldo Avenue) Proposed Use: Free-Standing Sign Applicant: WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY 5:00 P.M. - - - - - ADJOURNMENT - 2 - 1 AGENDA, OCTOBER 18, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS (Continued from September 20, 1979 Hearing) 1. ZN- 50-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (Hamilton Road and Highway #395) .Proposed Use: Mobile Home Park and Mini-Storage Applicant:. HOUGHTALING 2. ZN-123-79 AGRICULTURAL SUBURBAN TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (West of Division Street, 150 feet south of Graves Road) Proposed Use: Real-Estate Office Applicant: HASSING, INC. 3. ZW-140-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Northwest corner of Sunset Highway.and Hayford Road.) Proposed Use: Sale and display of manufactured homes. Applicants: PURDY and CHUMBLEY B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 4-. ZE- 51-74 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS o (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Sunderland Road) Proposed Use: 2-Story Furniture Store Applicant: ERICKSON 5. ZN-113-79 MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO LOCAL BUSINESS (Southwest corner-of West view Road and Highway #6) Proposed Use: Retail,and Offices Applicant: LAVIGNE . 6. ZW-178-78 AGRI'CULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Southeast corner*- Sunset-Blvd..and Fairview Heights Road) Proposed Use:: Mini-Warehouse Appl ic'ant: DOUGLAS t 7. ZW-130-79 AGRICULTURAL TO COMMERCIAL OR RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Northeast corner - Highway #2 and Grove Road) Proposed Use: Warehouse, Office, Travel Agency, Retail and Car Rental Applicant: Mc DOUGALD, 12:00 NOON - - - - - LUNCH (Place to be announced at the Hearing) 1:30 P.M. RECONVENE (contd j STAFF REPORT DATE: DECEMBER 13, "1979 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-155-79 "CONTINUED" 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Tom Braken STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner REQUESTED ZONING: Commercial EXISTING ZONING: Residential Office and Multiple Family, established, 1971 PROPOSED USE: Retail establishments PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Herald Road II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 8 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is flat, contains several types of trees and is unkempt. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The neighborhood is in a transition from undeveloped land and single family homes to Commercial, south of Main Avenue; north of Main Avenue has been developing into multiple family residences. LAND USE: Site Undeveloped North Multiple Family East Fire station/Balfour Park West Undeveloped/single family South Fidelity Savings/Washington Trust/University City ZONING: North Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1939 East Residential Office, established, 1968 Multiple Family Suburban, established, 1939 West Residential Office, established, 1971 Multiple Family, established, 1965 South Commercial, established, 1961 1 ZONE RECLASSIFICATI(--e' NUMBER: ZE-155-79 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 0 NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 5 Total Square Feet Approximately 104,885 sq. ft. Percent of Coverage 29% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 1 story Retail - 89,540 @ 11200 = 447 Restaurant - 11, 385 @ 1/50 = 67 Office - 3,960 @ 1/400 = 10 PARKING REQUIRED: 524 PROVIDED: 525 III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The request was originally scheduled for the October 18, 1979 hearing. It was continued until several environmental concerns were answered. The concerns were traffic generation, sewage disposal, and storm water. At the writing of this report only the traffic question had been addressed. The other two concerns have yet to be resolved between the applicants and the appropriate agencies. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 3. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water is ..required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Herald Road for right-of-way. 2. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Main Avenue for right-of- way. 2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATlr - NUMBER: ZE-155-79 IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) 3. Applicant shall dedicate the right-of-way for the extension of Felts Road between Sprague Avenue and Main Avenue as directed by and as shown on the County Engineer's Plat Plan of the proposed development. 4. Applicant shall dedicate a -20 foot radius on Herald Road and Main Avenue. 5. Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Felts Road and Main Avenue. 6. Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to issuance of building permits. 7. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Herlad Road and Main Avenue. 8. Special: The construction of Felts Road; reconstruction of existing traffic islands on Sprague Avenue adjacent to the proposed site and modification to the existing traffic signal at Sprague and Felts Road Extension shall be completed by the developer in cooperation with and as directed by the Spokane County Engineer. .9. 'Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 10. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and they are able to supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 3 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-155-79 2. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. The maintenance shall include an irrigation system for the land- scaping. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits the applicant shall work with the Health_Department and the Spokane County Engineer's Office to resolve the concerns of sewage di.sp_osal and storm water treatment and disposal. -4- 0 $ AR 9W I ) Q' J G C Q J ~ • W ~ ws•+a~ ~ • ~ 0 ac oES~tT ALD° 3 A~ _ t cL. a ? I0 SIR Av 3 " a 17 li H a r ! R 2 ALKI I ALKf 0 0' V 0 0 Q o15 .79 W i Q p 0 W 40 it sh 0 SWA / arw,~l~ i A L L E Y ME= c N N NI XON d Q a J r T ` a ¢ i D D W Molti 4, 3 MAIN F MAIN E- r 41N .l ' r 0 M a " N G N h 2 c r 1 J _ l "t R6~! C Q RIVEIt S.or (1 r Q 3 ; RI 0 < Z' W t1. ; x VER f z v%EL- /9E 0 •aCIL.1995 312 ` ?0 5 KA SPRRGUE No 2312+ \ - i 02 ' ~ ov t J TMI.~. ~ r _ ! ~GhZIqk~V¢ MILWAUKEE RAILROAD FOuRrm A v E FOURTH Av ASE C -ul ~ Z 1 1 u x p i T 0 r C r* z Ir m O - i p w < + 1 J )T~ 5EvE►~TM P 1i AVE. I E16M ~vE + dT~ 1N - t • , 20 i 21 ~ w 9 T►1 y rN ~ _..dA~,vfAr i~~ C y r AV i - 1 C. Old dYf 'j • • ♦Tlll I 1 . 10od Suite 103, The Campus ,e Park 1601-116th Avenue N.L. Bellevue, Washington 98004 (206) 454-8084 FbNtCIW NVESTMENTS, M. October 4, 1979 Mr. Pat Harper Diversified Planning and Development Consultants E. 9822 Sprague Ave. Suite #51 Spokane, Washington 99206 Dear Pat: Re: Northwest Corner Sprague & Felts This letter is our formal confirmation to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator concerning the rezoning hearing presently scheduled for October 18, 1979. Because of the need for additional time to prepare the necessary special studies concerning this site, we are requesting an indefinite postponement of the scheduled hearing. We will advise you when we will be prepared to schedule a new hearing date. Sincerely, Thomas R. J. Bracken Vice President cc: Mr. Mac Whiteford Mr. Michael Cytrynbaum FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: o Z2 9 Application No: ZE-155-79 Name of Applicant: Tom Braken (Diversified Planning & Dev. Consultants, Agent Street Address of Applicant: E. 9822 Sprague Ave. , Suite #51- City: Spokane State: WA 99206 Telephone No. 922-4355 Existing Zoning Classification: Residential Office e F,--9,„ Date Existing Zone Classification Established: February 11, 1971 Existing Use of Property: Vacant Proposed Zone Classification: Commercial Proposed Use of Property: Retail Establishments Legal Description of Property: The SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the SE 1/4 of Section 17 , EXCEPT the West 20 feet and EXCEPT the North 15 feet and EXCEPT the South 50 feet R.R. R/W and South 30 feet for Sprague Avenue. Section: 17 Township: 25 N. Range: 44, EWM r. Source of Legal: Guy C. Sturman, Professional Enaineer (Cer,ficate of Spey) _ Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) / 7 S Y Y" Property Size: 8 Acres Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: AVo e Street Address of the Property: /D ~2 5: ..5- u f^vt Who Holds Title to the Property: O ~ re? e If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it? Furnish a letter from a Title insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. -1- 0 -4 Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? Act 14 o'k i » v 1 vt sin V Q ' • " , ark ~•~e o l c~ ~~/~d~ 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? 42 C cc> r ~D I e . , 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in qu stion be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) re e r ' I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. (Sign i (Date) - 2 - ZONING WORKSHEET continued-3 PART ICJ - to be completed by Spokane County Fire Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District ~_T f 2) Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) J/~ ' Fire flow is np~ adequate for proposed development a is is not required 4) Main(s) need to be installed 5) ; S Hydrant(s) need to be installed, 6) Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) Nearest fire hydrant is Tom. feet. ; 8) Driving distance to nearest fire station is Comments: - t- gned Date PART V - to be completed by Spokane County Health Distri _F A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: , 2) Air quality is is `no(.a concern with this proposal. 3) Ground water quali ")is not a concern with this proposal. 4) Noise i is not a concern with this proposal. 5) Ligh s s not a concern with this proposal. o) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: '~ri l r tc - 1 D u.-.~~ 41 V Signed /7 W/ Date ZONING WORKSHEET--continued-2 PA21"-JI -to be completed, by Spokane County Utilities Department . preliminary consultation meeting has een held with the Spokane Comity Utilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed . f, . 1) The proposed development is/is not 1 sated in a publsewer service area operated and maintained by Spokane unty. 2) A storm drainage plan is/is not required or th16 proposal. Comments: S igned Date PART III- to be completed by S oane County Water Purveyor j? 1~ ~.~c.,¢-v 7 T 15 t~l 'ct 4- E W n L A. Water Supply 1) The proposed development is located w#t}Y t}~ ijr-~:: t(..~r tr -dtstri t boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agreement/arrangement has6as not been made to serve this proposal. 3) We (are/are not able to supply this development with adequate potable wa ter. 4) We are/are not able to supply this development with adequate -mater for fire flow. L•ze ~a"i_.~c• c~-, S) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other: czrcltv %`1' 6) Water system is is not under State Utilities jurisdiction. - : f 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: inches, Cl.~v tC - L L<t, u!*'- Lae n, t1.,<= 8) Distance to main: 7feet. J /ILiTZ CL ~'1[. t l _ 7►i~;.~Lt-C~Li ~4K! 1 u to be completed by ApApplicant 1) Individual water supply will be developed with/without fire protection capabilities. Comments: Signed Da to C. If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Department of Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to application. 1) I/We have reviewed the proposal. It appears to meet State requirements for public cl ter . -igned - D.S.H.S. ZONING WORKSHEET T Application = t= 15-5-- 7,9 71-lis do cumert will p.ovide the ?lanning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided far: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to reg sent a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Alaplicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed below} PART I - to be completed by Spokane County Encrineer A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: Yes No. 2) Access to be limited to: 141 3) ccess permit is required. 4) a , dication for rig t-of-way is required. feet on raea=Lt~' Road, Street, Avenue.) A5- b. thus foot) is required. (On and Road, Street, Avenue.) c. Slope easement is required S) Drainage Plan is required. on-site off-site. 6) \el-t4-4aving Permit is required. feet on Road.) 7) urb is required, (along Road, Street, Avenue.) .0 8) ;~~~dewalk is required. (along V-4-e- Road, Street, Avenue.) 9) ? Applicant must be willing to participate in future MID/RID. 10) Legal description is acceptable as reviewed. Parcel No. Comments: 4LO S igne Date ~ S a Q IE MAN 'A' VENW- (Oor ~ 0 3 ~ ~ 33 N =71 20 1 . 2 ~ L -SHOPS I~ 38'ZSo s~ ~ 107, 950 SF 2i,aoc 4 ~500 6F NtP.,22 , : - t' • • • • n • ' 1 ' ~ s .o ' Cm= r ~ t loot v r r ~'y M-ON 1* Z5, SHOPS I LO 1 so'. V COO >0 6F MEiZZ t 32 G N ~1G ~ r ~ nn b r _ `4 ~d mm I~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ f ~ o - ~ ~ S~'~KAN~ ~aU~T1~~ ~~~.F~~~ 1 R ~ 1 4% 1J L.! ~ ~ i _ } T~~ r - I ~ ~ ~ ! i i ~ i I! 4 r t~~ , ~ ~ J t ~ ~ I ~ ~ L_ t" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T~~ ~ r i;~f,~~~~i~~ i l i i q i ~ r ~ ~ 14 j ' i A F-- , ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ A5 - Irf ~ ' - _ ~ ~ ~li ~1 li~~~ ~~~9 ii y7 I 4 ' ~ ~ r ATTTACf ERr 3 82 I I T I ~ I 1 Q IF= J 101- ON ~ I I I w Ali f sP~UuE ~ NOQT H 4 AGENDA, NOVEMBER 159 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS CONTINUED 1. ZN- 50-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (Hamilton Road and Highway #395) Proposed Use: Mobile Home Park and Mini-Storage Applicant: HOUGHTALING (17.5 Acres) 2. ZE-155-79 RESIDENTIAL OFFICE AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN TO COMMERCIAL (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Herald Road) Proposed Use: Retail Applicant: BRACKEN (8 Acres) B. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 3. ZN-128-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Hastings Road, 300 feet East of State Highway #395) Proposed Use: Veterinary Clinic/Office Applicant: SLACK (.6 Acres) 4. ZE-163-79 AGRICULTURAL/TRANSIENT LIVING TO COMMERCIAL (Northeast corner of Sprague Avenue and Flora Road) Proposed Use: No proposal at this time. Applicant: HITCHCOCK (14.4 Acres) 5. ZW-101-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Thorpe Road, 300 feet East of Kenyon Road, extended North) Proposed Use: Restricted Industrial Uses Applicant: SCHULTZ (33.28 Acres) 12:00 NOON - - - - - LUNCH (Place to be announced at the Hearing) 1:30 P.M. RECONVENE C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 6. ZE-189-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Nora Avenue, approximately 800 feet East of Pines Road) Proposed Use: No proposal at this time. Applicant: MEDICUS (8.5 Acres) 7. ZN- 2-57 CHANGE OF CONDITIONS - LOCAL BUSINESS (Southeast corner of Country Homes Blvd. and Wall Street) Proposed Use: Professional Office/Retail Shops Applicant: NORTHWOOD PROPERTIES (5.42 Acres) (contd.) ow +n z H 8k r d C J Q C O J ~ a J ~ ~ Q, AfM~T ~ • O ` O crr cr° CESvET 4 ; ZO A~ r t a - 2 10 RR AY 3 17 16 c ALK I 7 , ASK i A W , u o o' 0 o O < ZEwl55m79 V I J 0 Q W ~1r h •.•yr ~ r Y~ Y ll.w SCti / L. LU WAY X ALLEY W rj i ~0 v N N I ~ NI XOH ~ 44 J It o AIN MAIN n AVE .►~ru J h4 C; TON z ` R 1 .e~ot ` RIVEq I S ~•~EL.l9~ c' IA . - a E~.1993 r j12 ` ?0 5 KA SPRAGUE No 2312# av t rM~~. .T l f I - ~ ~1Yo ~~4s~t MILWAUKEE RAI BROAD 1~G Iro f : ;ro aTN AVE FOQPTr+ AV - avE 1 1 u 0 x C 0 T M, r 0 - film l ~ ti SIATH r. f h 46 *140 0 Oc N < 7 > 77 « 5Ev, FNTl, J ~ AvE Elg ; AVE dt~ ia+ E 1 I TM To" 'fA~ r 9 . i l - 9'1 11 Z .I' t A01~ IYf ~ .ll .~0. `,r•....► to ~ IC SJ, 1'r c. F .011 , ' ~ + ":>R" Z It M. / AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) GINGER JOHNSON ~11 A Being first duly swor on o h, d °o es and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington, and over the age of eighteen years. That on the 5th day of NOVEMBER , 1979, I personally deposited in the United States mail at OPPORTUNITY STATION POST OFFICE with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the 5th day of NOVEMBER , 1979 who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and did notice adjacent property owners to the site by certified mail. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. DATED this day of -y 19 SUBSCRIBED ea d SWORN to me this day of 19 r NOTARY PUB IC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing `t Spokane, Washington APPLICATION NUMBER Ze- AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) PAT HARPER Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on NOVEMBER 55 1979, he personally posted a true and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane County, to-wit: Applicant or Agent Subscribed and sworn to me 60 19. r NOTARY PU LIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington Z-,=.. /-4zr-~ 7 ~ . A Page LIST OF OWNERS AND PI $UONS PAYING TAXES.ON PROPERTY IN. THE THE, DISTRICT DESCRIBED TN--ZONE-CHANGE PETITION Np. 'PC A. Certificati6n' of Title Com an : I hereby certify that the following list o names-an -a resses consisting of this and the following pages has been prepared from the latest available records and is to the best of ray knowledge correct. For_ Sinned by ffl," A" Date 79 -Last Grantee in Chain ADDITION TOTICE of Title (0) and ADDRESS u`~ILED Persons Paying Tdxes T LOTS BLK N200ft of W204.6f of E83ft B223 Opp rtun' ty- - - - - - `T' Fidelity Mutual EARL SORSDAHL 20541-0310 S1/2 of Lot 4 B 0 L. J. Brownson Opp. Plat 43 - - - - - - - - - - - ♦ - - - - ft - - - - Pacific 1st Federal S&L 13-123194-3 17544-2610 N200ft of W177.2 ---t of .,Z.-FJ-gwgop,- Q_o..• - - - - - - - - - - - - E1/2 B224 Opp... - - Fidelity Mutual Bank 3-1003-28640-2 20541-0409. Lot 6,B 5 Kraft Apartments _ Opp. Plat #3 32 Second Street, Troy Savings Bank Trnv New York 12180 17944-2911 S1/2 of Lot 3 E- C. Reinexez B6 Opp. Plat #3 N. 124 Walnut Rd Elroy- Reinemer 'S okane WA 99206 17544-2608- El/2 of W1/2. of . W1/4 f_ SE1/4 of Spokane County_Park & Rec. - -,0 ,Z44- - - - - - - - - - - - - - SE174 exc : ~ . ~ 2 ; tl7- T 17544-9032-Red W1/2 of W1/2 of Wl/4 f.SEI/4 of 0 S ,okarLe ~ounty_ SE1/4 exc. 5243. 7ft -2,~-•~4- T' 17544-c)0'31 - Spokane Valley Chamber S.243.77ft of W1,'2 of 112 of SW1/4 _ 0 of Commerce of SEJ/4 of SE1/ 17 2,5-4A_ r. - - - - - - - - - - - - Spokane Valley Chamber E. 10303 Sprague Ave. T of Commerce S okane,._W,;~__ ,992.9._.. 1J54~- N397.3ft of W110 :'t _ 0 H B. Thornhill ,~g__ B222 Opportunity - dMcG!arthy Manaement University -its Inc.--- 4.4.07_Dizisiocz-St.. -2a541--0-210 E. 449.8ft exc. 60ft 0 H. B { Thornhill_ 5223 Opportunity W. 710 Riverside Aye. ...T-Crescent YZA--99201 _ The Coachman A l da- J_ . Wa.l f:f - r - - - - - Unit 6 - - - - T---F~.'de1i`t~z=--Mu.~ual.~ ~-1.~3-1(~4-3-2 _.1?_59~-32.0.6_.__ _ • continue on reverse side LAST GRANTEE IN CRAIN ADDITTON 'O TITLE (0) AND A 1)DI f-,~, PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 Alvin J. Wolff The Coachman Unit 21 Fidelity 1-1-31Q-23-4 17544-3221 0 Alvin J. Wolff The Coachman, Unit 8 Fidelity Mutual 1-1-29558-3 17544-3208 0 Luvin a, W ff The Coachman, Unit 9 T Fidelit mutual 1-1-29558-3 17544-3209 0 Alvin J. Wolff The Coachman, Unit 10 T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-29558-3 17544-3210 0 Alvin J. Wolff The Coachman, Unit 11 Fidelity Mutual 1-1-29558-3 17544-3211 0 Alvin J. Wolff The Coachman Unit 12 A. Fidelity Mutual 1-1-29558-3 17544-3212 0 Alvin J. Wolff The Coachman, Unit 13 `I' Fidelity Mutual 1-1-29558-3 17544-3213 0- Alyin J. Wolf The Coachman Unit 15 T Fidelity Mutual- 1- -2 558-3 17544-3215 0 Alvin J. Wolff The Coachman, Unit 17 T Fidelity mutual 1-1-29558-3 13544-3217 0 Alvin J. Wolff The Coachman Unit 3 T - - - 17544-3203 Lot 3, Block 5 C Alvin J. Wolff Op. Plat #3 F. H. A. -02 171-35037-SHM 17544-2516 N1/2 of Lot 4, Block 0 M. L. Wa bri ht Opp. Plat #3 N. 116 Walnut Rd. Myrtle L. Higgins S okane WA 992.06 17544-2609 N200ft of E150ft of 24 & 0 Washington t N2.00ft o W16.5ft of 223 Opp. Washin ton Trust Bank 2Q541-0414 PTN of Lots 3 & 4 Block 4 n M J. McIntosh etal 02p. Plat #3 '1° Fidelity Mutual Bank 1-35-1617-9 17544-2425 R 1 v ~ 1-,AST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF 1111 T1,F (0) AND A 1) PI f:,;S Ll~f'.; 13L1 1ERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 Old National Bank Lot 5, B 6 Opp. Plat 3 T Old National Bank 17544-2611 0 Edmund Merkle N1/2 L2, B6 Opp. Plat #3 N. 302 Walnut Rd T Ed Mer le Spokane, Washington 99206 17544-2605 E130ft of N1/2 of L3 0 Wayne Tedrow B6 Opp. Plat #3 Rt. 3, Box 15B T Wan Tedrow 'Cheney WA 99004 17544-2613 W1/2 of Lot 2, B4 0 Heinz Ze ke Opp. Plat #3 Box 3412 T Zenith Mortgage Los Angeles, CA 90051 17544-2407 U-City Terrace Unit 10405-5 C Joe W. Youn blut inc. .066666% undivided interesi E. 10405 Main, Unit #5 T Jose h Youn blut Spokane, WA 99206 17544-3305 U-City Terrace Unit 10409-13 0 Mary-L.- Wood inc. .066666% undivided interest 1' Lincoln Mutual Bank 6-1-3740-1 17544-3313 0 William . Wolff The Coachman Unit 22 Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31031-7 17544-3222 PTN of SW1/4 of SE1/4 of SE1/4 0 J. Williams 17-25-44 W. 328 3rd Ave. T David McGann Spokane, WA 99204 17544-9042 PTN of SW1/4 of SE1/4 of SE1/4 0 Jerome Williams 17-25-44 Route 2, Box 89 T Jerome Williams Hayden Lake, Id 17544-9047 U-City Terrace Unit 10407-8 0 William R. Vaughn inc. .08888% a d' e 'interest E. 1040-7 Main., Unit 8 T W. Vaughn S okane WA 99206 17544-3308 PTN of B223 and B224 C University-City- Opp. University City, Inc. T % McCarth Management N. 4403 Division 20541-0413 PTN of B221 and 8222 0 University City, Inc. Opp. Moody plaza #15388 T American National Insurance Galveston, TX 77550 2Q541-Q108 0 John Swannack S1/2 L2 B.6 Opp. Plat 3 N. 216 Walnut Rd 'f' John W. Swannack Spokane, Washington 99206 17544-2606 PTN of $W1/4 of SE1/4 0 Robert E. Sterling of SE1/4 17-25-44 Robert E. Sterling Box 2822 Spokane,WA 99220 17544-9052 LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION O T1TLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS DLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 Spokane Valle M. E. Church PTN L10 B4 Opp. Plat E. 10422 Main Ave. T Spokane Valle M. E. Church Spokane, WA 99206 17544-2424- Red S244ft of El/2 of W1/ of SW1/4 0 Spokane Valle Fire District Sel/4 of SE1/4 17-25-44 17544-9034 - Red PTN of SW1/4 of SE1/4 0 Bauman Scro s of Sel 4 17-25-44 4624 142nd P1. S. E. T Scroggs Bellevue WA 98006 17544-9051 U-City Terrace Unit 1 405-2 T.eo Inc. 1066666% undivi ed intereE 0 Schmitt E. 10,405 Main, Unit 2 T Schmitt Spokane, WA 99206 17544-3302 U-City Terrace Unit l C407-11 0 Leo it Inc. .065555% undivid d interest E. 10407 Main, Unit #11 T William P- Heaton Spokane, WA 99206 17544-3311 U-City Terrace Unit l C405-6 0 Arthur A. Rotondo Inc. .065555% undivi ed interes E. 10405 Main, Unit #6 T t ur A. Rotondo Spokane, WA 99206 17544-3306 U-City Terrace Unit l C405-4 0 Carl M. Pollock Inc. .063333 undivide interest T Lincoln Mutual Bank 6-1-3142-1 17544-3304 0 Phillips, etal The Coachman Unit 16 T Fidelity Mutual 3-1108-2442-0 17544-3216 0 R. R. Pettin er The Coachman Unit 14 T Fidelti Mutual 1-35-2764-8 17544-3214 0 R. R. Pettin er The Coachman Unit 23 T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31036-3 17544-3223 0 R. R. Pettin er The Coachman Unit 1 T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31021-8 17544-3201 U-City Terrace Unit 1Q,107-10 0 Lars E. Neilson Inc- -n6RRRS undivided interest T Lincoln Mutual Bank 6-1-3178-X 17544-3310 U-City Terrace Unit 10105-1 0 Lottie M. Meier Inc. .063333 undivided interest 01 E. 1Q405 Main Ave, Unit 1 T Lottie M. Meier -Spokane, WA 99206 17544-3301 N1/2 of Lot 3 Block 7 0 Mcwillims Opp. Plat 3 N. 205 Walnut Rd T Lawrence McWilliams Spokane, WA 99206 117544-2705 .LAST GP.ANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE ( 0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) S1/2 L4 B7 exc W109.2 ft. 0 T. J. McGrive f E Opp. Plat ##3 T Colwell Company 091-383-15 17544-2712 N100ft of W1/2 of L3 0 H. D. Martinson B4 Opp. Plat #3 T Pacific 1st Federal S & L 15-9-153156-7 17544-2408 U-City Terrace Unit 10409-15 0 Howard C. Lemle Inc. .066666% undivided interesi E. 10409 Main, Unit 15 T H m e n W 9206 17544-3315 N1/2 L5 B5 0 Carl A- .:rphlp --Opp Plat N. 301 Felts Rd. T Washington 99206 17544-2511 E192ft of N1/2 of 0 L5 B7 O Plat 3 -Glenn W. Kivett T Sherwood & Roberts -2420000 17544-2709 S42ft of Ll; N1/2 of 0 G. R. Jacoby L2 B5 O Plat #3 E. 18417 Liberty Ave. T Georcip. R. aco S okane WA 99216 17544-2503 0 Alice S. Holmes -The Coachman Unit 7 E. 10321 Main ##201, i Alice S. Holmes Unit 7 Spokane, WA 17544-32Q7 U-City Terrace Unit 10405-3 0 Glenn E. Haskins Inc. .063333 undivided interest T Lincoln Mutual 6-1-3182-7 17544-3303 N1/2 Lot 4, Block 7 0 K. E. Gud ell Opp. Plat #3 S. 3718 Ridgeview Dr. T Dr. K. E. Gud el S okane WA 99206 17544-2707 0 Karen S. Gilmore S1/2 L5 B5 Opp. Plat T Pacific National Bank 8993322823 17544-2512 0 D. W. Gibone S1/2 L3 B7 Opp. Plat N. 123 Walnut Rd T Daniel W. Gibone ok n V2 99206 17544-2706 0 W. J. Fortier E. 9320 Nixon Ave T Marvin E. Hunter Spokane, Washington 9 206 13544-25Q4 0 Robert P. Foley The Coachman Unit-2- T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31030-9 17544-32Q2 U-City Terrace Unit l C407-7 0 Evelyn M. Foedish Inc. .065555% undivided interest E. 10407 Main, Unit 7 T E. M. Foedish Spokane, WA 99206 17544-3307 LAST GRANTEE IN (:I•iAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS RT,K PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 Fidelity Mutual 8223 Opportunity T Fidelity Mutual EARL SORSDAHL 20541-0309 0 Equitable, etal The Coachman Unit 18 T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31049-9 17544-3218 0 Equitable Investments The Coachman Unit 4 T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31047-3 17544-3204 0 Equitable Investments The Coachman Unit 5 T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31048-1 17544-3205 E180ft of S1/2 of L5 0 John W. Epton B7 Opp. Plat 3 _ N. 7 Walnut Rd T John W. E ton Spokane, WA 99206 17544-2711 0 B. J. Du Planti The Coachman Unit 20 T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31020-0 17544-3220 0 Michael S. Care The Coachman Unit 24 T Fidelity Mutual 1-1-31019-2 17544-3224 U-City Terrace Unit 10,109-12 0 Dora D. Anderson Inc. .071111% undivide interest T Lincoln Mutual Bank 6-1-3012-X 17544-3312 U-City Terrace Unit 10 07-9 0 Leslie E. Aman Inc. .066666 undivided interest E. 10407 Main, Unit 9 T Leslie E. Aman S okane, WA 99206 17544-3309 U-City Terrace Unit 10409-14 0 Lela C. Aldrich Inc. .071111% undivide intere-st E. 10409 Mian, Unit 14 T Lela C. Aldrich. Spokane, WA 99206 17544-3314 0 T 0 T 0 T 0 T a