Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-228-79
ZONE/PUD RECLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST Contact: # r= - 77 File zz_ PART I r ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside / ownership) l ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION, (F o r m A) 44 1 ZONING WORKSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PLOT PLANS (5) fo J rP61 e-,vyvvif W 111-4 SIGN PLAN ~41A LANDSCAPE PLANS (5) GRAPHICS PACKET (date) SLIDES (minimum size film 126) APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER 3Z q TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS (date) COUNTY AGENCIES NOTIFIED NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPED, (date) ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT (date) STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST STAFF ANALYSIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING (A Sign - 4x4) (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) (date) ANALYSIS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PART III HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED MINUTES- MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) SEPA's Notice of Action BONDING (Landscape) ACCEPTED (date) RETURNED (date) is [Do ATE HOUR 6 WHIL YOU WERE OUT OF PHONE AREA CODE PHONE NUMBER TELEPHONED RETURNED CALL LEFT PACKAGE PLEASE CALL WAS IN PLEASE SEE ME WILL CALL AGAIN WILL RETURN IMPORTANT MESSAGE zr y, l SIGNED The AICO-UTILITY Line Form No. 55-056 ;mss - s; U ooe~ Aen Z4rAMv ti., ucI cv~ ~a~ ~o /nom Gv~z U "Q Olt G /t ~,`P74 A40t., a4e, apj-Lcsvtif )-47 /3oCC~Lzr- ~0-OYLO 7s. . aoll NO. 80 a4 20 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON FINDINGS AND ORDER REGARDING ZONING MAP PROPOSAL, ZE-228-79, AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN: McCASLIN WHEREAS, The Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee did, after public hearing on December 13, 1979, forward to the Board of County Commissioners a recommendation that the Zoning Map not be changed from the existing Agricultural classification to the Multiple Family Suburban classification on property described as follows: That portion of Block 192 of Vera described as follows: The N 112 of the S 2/5 of the W 112 EXCEPT The East 70 feet and EXCEPT the West 20 feet. Together with the East 70 feet of the West 112 of the S 2/5 AND the West 70 feet of the E 112 of the S 2/5 of said Block 192 EXCEPT the South 5 feet, in Section 27, Township 25 N., Range 44, E.W.M., Spokane County, Washington. and, WHEREAS, The Board conducted its own public hearing on January 30, 1980, at the request of the applicant, Mr. Bob McCaslin, South 1003 Pines Road, Spokane, WA, to present evidence and testimony in favor of this application, and WHEREAS, The Board did consider the recommendation of the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee and testimony and evidence of the applicant and other interested parties, and WHEREAS, At said hearing opportunity was afforded those favoring and those opposing the above-described Zoning Map proposal, and the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County having fully considered the testimony given, the records and minutes of the Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee and all other evidence presented and having personally acquainted themselves with the site and vicinity in question, did approve Agricultural Suburban zoning for this site to allow duplexes; and WHEREAS, The Board, having determined that said Agricultural Suburban zoning will not allow five duplexes on this site as intended by the Board at the time of its decision on February 25, 1980, does hereby amend its decision of February 25, 1980 to approve Multiple Family Suburban zoning for this site, subject to conditions as follows: 1) Permitted uses on this site shall be limited to five or less duplexes or single family residences. 2) The concept of a twenty (20) foot wide driveway to serve interior portions of this site is approved, subject to review in conjunction with specific site plan. 3) Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Blake Road for right of way. (contd.) 80 0 420 ZE-228-79 (contd.) 4) Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Blake Road and 20th Avenue. 5) Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 6) The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. 7) Purveyor is Vera Water and Power, and they are able to supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. Some system changes may be required to accommodate a multi-family use. 8) That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 9) The zone reclassification has been found to be environmentally non- significant. Therefore, a Final Declaration of Non-Significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. 10) The specific development plan for this zone reclassification shall be subject to all of the provisions of SEPA, Chapter 43.21C RCW when submitted to the Hearing Examiner Committee. 11) The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 12) Applicant shall work with water district to assure the availability of water for domestic and irrigation purposes before change of conditions hearing for specific site plan approval. 13) Access plans for firefighting equipment will be required prior to building permit issuance. 14) A detailed combined on-site sewage system and surface water disposal plan for the entire project shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Spokane County Health District prior to the issuance of any building permit. DATED This day of MAR 2 4 1980 1980. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON ORAY C. K01 L.17 . HARRY K LARNED RAY W. CHR1.9UNSEN ATTEST: BY: Deputy s AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON, ' COUNTY OF SPOKANE, being first duly sworn Notice of Action by the Spokane County on oath deposes and says that he is the Hearing Examiner Committee of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekly newspaper. That said news- Pursuant to the provisions of chapter paper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six 43.21C RCW, nonce is hereby given thal the Spokane County Hearing Examiner months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to, published Committee did on March 24, 1980. take in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County. I the action described below. fl Any acllon to set aside, enjoin, review Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office or otherwise challenge such action on maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which the grounds of non-Compliance with the provisions of chapter 43.21C RCW (State said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Su- Environmental Policy Acts shell be commenced on May 9, 1480, Or be Perior Court of the State of Washing-ton in and for Spokane County. That the barred The action taken by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, notice of which is hereby given, was as annexed is a true copy of a ,~pt, follows: (1) Approved Action. Zone reclas sificatian from Agricultural to Mult:- Famil Sub, (2) Descrlption: for 5 or less duplexes ag it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form), of said or Single Family use. (3) Such action pertained 10 property commonly known as and-or described as: Located in the Northeast corner of newspaper once each week for a period of t,,Vo...... consecutive 20th Ave. and Blake Rd. (4) Pertinent documents may be examined during normal county busi- ness hours at the Spokane County Plan- weeks, commencing on the .17-___...day of.......... _A=il....... ning Department, N. 711 Jefferson Street. Spokane, Washington, 99260. ~ Phone (509) 456.2105. .,-r. , ? Filed Gwen By: Bob , mccasiin and owner such newspaper was regularly distribute, to, BY: Bob McCaslln owner d I both dates ~nclu8eve, and L, that day A-2-4.9 its subscribers du ' 1 of sai rind. OOP Subtle and sworn to before me this ` y cit .I ie i Xr7pu lie in and for the State ington, Residing at: Spokane, NVA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON. 1 COUNTY OF SPOKANE, za:w...04....VL' Huumi........ being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the .ED-ZT-CB................................... Notice of Action b of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekly newspaper. That said news- Hear ing Examiner Committee paper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six Pursuant to the provisions of chapter months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to. published 43.21C RCW. notice is hereby given that the Spokane County Hearing Examiner in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County. Committee did on March 24, 1900, take Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office the action described below. Any action to set aside, en)oin, review maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which erwise challenge such action said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Su- the oth grounds of non-compliance with the e ih pprrovisions of chapter 43.21C RCW (State perior Court of the State of Wasbington in and for Spokane County. That the Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on May 9, 19W, or be barred The action taken by the Spokane annexed is a true copy of a Drat.1,Ca.-OY--,11111 Ct Ca2....... County Hearing Examiner committee, notice of which is hereby given, was as fol lows (1) Approved Action: Zone recles- from Agricultural to Multi- Family Sub, as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form), of said (2) Description: for 5 or less duplexes or Single Family use. (3) Such action pertained to property commonly known as and-or described newspaper once each week for a period of .................#,yvp consecutive as: Located in the Northeast corner of 20th Ave. and Blake Rd. (4) Pertinent documents may be weeks, commencing on the-.....2nd._.._day of.......... -A-imil 19-W... examined during normal county busi. ness hours at the Spokane County Plan ning Department. N. 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane, Washington, 99260. and ending on the 9th..•.._•day of.._•----..._.......- April _ 19.x_. Phone (509) 456.2205. Notice Given 9y: Bob McCaslin both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to Fled By. Bo 4.2MCj 9 lin, owner its subscribers duri all of s peri Subse nd sworn to before me t.his...................... .9t.}-----_.--------- day April 19 80. Public in and for the State of-rashington, Residing at: Spokane, WA County File ZE-228-79 Sec. 27 R' 5N T'sliip 44 E.W.M. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S.S. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) 053 /jIC 6"1 ~z.1i✓ ueing first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the -~(7 day of ,6 pg) 1_ , 19 I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspi- cuous mann-r ca the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which is the subject of the ACTION, to wit, the following locations: 1. /t ~ C!~' 2. 3. 4. DATED this 7- day n f _ 19 . SUBSCRIBED and SWORN before me this day of OPSWORN r _o 19. ~ v Notarv Public i and for the State of .Washington, siding at Spokaue GeV 1 % COLlrlty File 0 ZE-228-79 • Sec. 27 R' 25N T'sh'p44E.W.M. - NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY Hearing Examiner Committee PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE SPOKANE COUNTY Hearing Examiner Committee DID ON _ _ ~Tjarch 24, 1980 TAKE THE ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRO- VISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW. (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED ON 5/ 9 / 80 (30 days from date of 2nd news- paper publication) OR BE BARRED. THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY Hearing Examiner Committee NOTICE OF WHICH IS HEREBY GIVEN, WAS AS FOLLOWS: (1) APPROVED ACTION: Zone reclassification from Agricul- tu tF21 o MMuu t~ Family Sub. (2) C PTf~N : for 5 or less duplexes or Single Family use. (3) SUCH ACTION PERTAINED TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS AND/OR DESCRIBED AS (street address per general location) : Located in the Northeast corner of 20th Ave. and Blake Rd. (4) PERTINENT DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING NORMAL COUNTY BUSINESS HOURS AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, 99260 PHONE: (509) 456-2205 NOTICE GIVEN BY: Bob McCaslin FILED BY: NAME: Bob iT T LE: Owner SIGNATURE i(C Bob McCaslin c/o Transamerica Title N. 720 Argonne Rd. Spokane, WA 99206 Revised 4/17/79 ATTN: Sue L. 5 I A WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY Olvmpi,., Washington 9MC4 206753 28(X~ f Y' I\\ Ducy Lee Ray Gouernor T0: FROM: 7 _ The Washington State Department of Ecology headquarters office (Olympia) has received and recorded the following "Notice of Action Taken" pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. This notice is now on file and available for review upon request. Acting agency: Type of action taken: Proj ect . yp ' 1/)o 1!1k Date received: DOE f i l e number: NAT- oya~' This letter indicates only filing of the notice of action with the Department of Ecology. It does not indicate concurrence with the format or contents of the notice, or compliance with all provisions of RCW 43.21C.080. If you have anv quest inns ; contact the Fn\.r i ronmental Rpv l (206) 753-6892. ECY 010-4-50 Rev. 6/78 .Q. OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date February 11 119 80 To Commissioner Larned From_ _ Mard a Raines , ZorLi_Dg _ Admi n i strator Subject ZE-228-79 McCasl i n The site currently consists of 2 lots - one with 125 feet of frontage on Blake Road and 250 feet depth (31,000 square feet) and the second with 150 feet of frontage on 20th Avenue and 250 feet depth (36,000 square feet). Combining these 2 lots gives the site an "L" shaped appearance. The lot at the corner of Blake and 20th is not a part of this proposal. Jack Finney of the County Engineers Office indicates that width of the site, and proximity of the site to the intersection make public or private roads unfeasible. An interior drive or access is the best means of providing access to the rear portion of the site. Without access to the rear of the site the developer is limited to developing the site as a duplex project. The existing Agricultural zone would require a Conditional Use Permit for duplex development and allow a total of 4 units on this site. Both the Agricultural Suburban and Two family Residential zones would allow duplex develop- ment on this site. Again, a total of 4 units would be possible on this site. By utilizing an interior driveway to serve the rear portion of the site, and rezoning the site to Multiple Family Suburban, as requested by the applicant, the site can be developed at a higher density. Maximum allowable density for this site, in the Multiple Family Suburban zone would be 32 units. Although the applicant has not submitted a site plan with the rezone request, he has indicated that anticipated development of this site will not exceed 16 units, or 112 the allowable density. I have briefly discussed some alternatives for develnpment of this site. Tf voij would lil~n additinnal infnrriatinn, nlnase rill mn, pm Ale No. ZE-228-79 SPOKANE COUN 1 l' IIEARING EXAMINER COMMI-I I LE ; FINDINGS AND C)RDER f, . I fJ I I~ i~ U l J L: I I~.~ ~J This matter having collie belo►•e the Examiner Committee on December 13 Mcj~ur 1979, and the member's of the Committee present being ilgax am j, Chairman, Jane Myers and Paul Sceva, Jr., and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Bob McCasl in, applicant, for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural to Multiple Family Suburban for the purpose of Apartments B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is generally residential and undeveloped. 2. That the Compreherisive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal 15/NkxxK)tx in conflict with the provisions of adopted regulation. 1 hat the land in this area is )=rA)oUjy(unsuitable for the proposed use, or- uses within the pr•opused Zone Classification. 1 r File Nu. ZE-228-79 8. Mat the proposed use is ? MWX a/incompatible with existing uses in IIIL: area. 9. That the owners of idjdcent lands expressed x ixt~ r >~r1 /di5appruv~~ of the proposed use. not IU. The Hearing ExamMer Committee finds/dxP- xxxwMW& the proposed use to/be in harmony with the general purpose and will Q01k be MV*~Xg detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 1l. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: d) That the proposed density is not compatible with the single family residential character of the neighborhood. b) C. ORDER T-he Hearing Examinee Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of' Bob McCaslin for a Zone Reclassifica as described in the application should be -RpVAygry"O/denied. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: r' k. That the Hearing Examiner mmittee after hea all testimony and a review of the 5 _ analysis adopts the proposed declaratro f non- signifi - e and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the fina declaration of non-significance. 2 File No. ZE-228-79 Motion by: PIyers Seconded by: Sceva, Jr. Vote. Unanimous HEARING EXAMINER COMMIT-TE=E . Chairman f- k EC) L . [)Al t--j AkSH Planning Director By: 3 IL STAFF REPORT DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1979 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-228-79 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Bob McCaslin STATUS OF APPLICANT: Property Owner REQUESTED ZONING: Multi-family Suburban EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural PROPOSED USE: Apartments (no specific plot plan submitted at this time) PROJECT LOCATION: East side of Blake Road approximately 120 feet north of 20th Avenue. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 1.51 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS: Site is basically flat and totally vacant NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Area is predominately single family with a multi-family complex established southwest of this site. LAND USE: Site Undeveloped North Single family East Single family and undeveloped West Single family and multi-family (Terrace Manor) South Undeveloped and single family ZONING: North Agricultural, established, 1960 East Agricultural, established, 1960 West Agricultural Suburban, established, 1954 South Agricultural, established, 1960 Southwest Multi-family Suburban, established, 1968 1 - ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NIIMBER : ZE-228-79 I I , SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential neighborhood NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: None (site is vacant) III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The applicant will be required to appear before the Hearing Examiner Committee for a change of conditions hearing to have a specific site plan approved and appropriate conditions required at that time. It ~J t, Io. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District: #1. 2. No comments receive(' . b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet on Blake Road for right-of"-way. 2. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Blake Road and 20th Avenue. ry 3. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 4. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall he in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Vera Water and Power and they are able to supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. Some system changes may be required to accommodate a multi-family use. d} i. No comments received. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATION AMBER: ZE-228-79 IV. AGENCIES CQNSUL1 LD/(_Ol`Y1MENTS RECEIVED (Continued) e) SEPA (continued) 2. The zone reclassification has been found to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-signifi- cance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. 3. The specific development plan for this zone reclassification shall be subject to all of the provisions of SEPA, Chapter 43.21C RCW when submitted to the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. 2. Applicant shall work with water- district to assure the availability of water for domestic and irrigation purposes before change of conditions hearing for specific site plan approval. 3 i BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) ZE-228-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY ) NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SUBURBAN. APPLICANT: McCASLIN ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 3:00 P.M. ON JANUARY 30, 1980, at its office in the County Courthouse to consider the above-mentioned zone reclassifi- cation on the following described property: That portion of Block 192 of Vera as per Plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats Page 30, D.A.F.: The N 1/2 of the S 2/5 of the W 112 EXCEPT the E 70 feet and EXCEPT the W 20 feet together with the E 70 feet of the W 112 of the S 2/5 and the W 70 feet c the E 112 of the S 2/5 of said Block 192 EXCEPT the S 5 feet in Spokane County, Washington. Located in Section 27, Township 25, Range 44 E.W.M. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition to an appeal on said matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 7 day of January, 1980. VERNON W. OHLAND CLERK OF THE BOARD B1~- os nne Montague, Deputy Cler I AI'PEAL Rl,'QUEST FORM THE BOARD OI~ '_'~~UN1'Y COPQ1j InNE12S R C V U t ~ Appeal Fee - $75.00 2 I 1979 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Name: Bob McCaslin Today's Date 12/21/79 (Please Print Address: S. 1003 Pines Rd. 'Lip Code: 99216 Home Phone: N/A Eusiness Phone: 928-4000 Hearing Examiner Committee Action Being Appealed Title: Zone Reclassification Preliminary Subdivision Number: N/A Zone Reclassification Number: ZE-228-79 Date of Hearing Examiner Committee Action: 12/13/79 Signature: ~r c Signature of Authorized Representative: N/A Address: N/A YOUR REASONS FOR APPEAL 1. That the proposed use is compatible with-existing multiple family use in the area as well as other mixed land uses. 2. That the size and shape of the property does not lend it- self to single family use. 3. That the density proposed is less than the multiple family existing in the immediate area. VtD • JAN 3 1980 SPOKANE COUNTY PUNNING ULPANIMENI OFFICE USE ONLY Copies to: Planning Engineers Environmental Health Fee Received: Check # ( g Cas11 Receipt Number- 5 5Hearing Date: BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ) AMENDED ZE-228-79, AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY ) COMMISSIONERS' DECISION SUBURBAN - APPLICANT: McCaslin ) This being the time set by the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington to reconsider its decision concerning the request of-Bob McCaslin, South 1003 Pines Road, Spokane, WA for the above captioned zone reclassification; and The Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee having heard the above request on December 13, 1979, did deny said application; and The Board having conducted its own public hearing on January 30, 1980, at the request of the applicant, Mr. MCCaslin, and after visiting the site and reviewing the testimony; and The Board being fully advised in the premises did determine, based upon the testimony submitted at the public hearing and other evidence available to the Board to approve the site for agricultural suburban zoning to allow duplexes; and The Board having further determined that said agricultural suburban zoning will not, in fact, allow five duplexes on subject site as intended by the Board at the time of its decision on February 25, 1980. The Board does hereby amend its decision of February 25, 1980, to approve Multiple Family Suburban Zone reclassification as requested by the appli- cant/appellant, Mr. McCaslin; PROVIDED, that the use of subject site be and hereby is limited to five duplexes or less or single family residences and no other uses are permitted. The Board further indicated its approval of a twenty foot (20') wide drive- way to serve the site. The Board instructed the Planning Staff to prepare Findings and Order, for execution by the Board at a subsequent meeting, setting forth more definitively the Board's action in amending this decision. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 3 day of March, 1980. VERNON W. OH~I MD Clerk of the gdard by Ro anne Montague, Deputy Cler _ I ~IIy I . i. } PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET ,.r' ig t-~• PHONE 456-2205 a i SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE File # ZE-228-79 Section 27 Township 25 Range 44 Classification Agricultural to multiple family suburban Proponent Bob McCaslin T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N PROPOSED/FINAL DECLARATION OF SIGNIFICANCE/NON-SIGNIFIC ANCE 1. Description of Proposal: Zone reclassification. No proposed development at this time. Specific site plan to be approved at later date, which will require an additional checklist and a change of conditions. 1.5 acres 2. Proponent: Bob McCaslin/c/o Transamerica Title Co. 3. Contact Person: John Stoeser Phone: 922-2222 4. County Action Requested: Zone change 5. Location of Proposal: In Spokane Valley adjacent to and North of 20th Avenue, and adjacent to and East of Blake Road. 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is notrequired under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental check- list and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name Fred Dayharsh Name Chairman Signature Signature Title Director Title Chairman Department Spokane County Planning Dept. Department Hearing Examiner Committee Date November 28, 1979 Date December 13, 1979 Revised 6/1/79 IMPORTANT MESSAGE FOR A.M. DATE TIME P.M. WHILE YOU WERE OUT M -til "ef ~T OF Q►/ PHONE NO.~ ~y ~fo TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED R CALL MESSAGE SIGNED CASCADE L1-A2334 wAMIN use December 1?79 r 1a,q the undersigned, are = opposition to the proposed zone change from agricultural to multiple-family suburban on the property located at: Biake Lioa(, east side,, 120 feet north of Twclntieth Avenue, section 27-25-4TH:- with the purpostu use of apartments. We are opuosed to tai.s ehaiv-e due to tale following reason::: 1. Unfair to those people who have by choice purchased homes in an agriculT, zoned area. 2. Increased traffic on 20th avenue and Blake road. Already there is a traffic hazard in the area due to the apartment building located on corner of Blake and 20th due to parking alongside the roadways. 39 This area is a primarily single-family dwelling vicinity and tale proposed apartments would force an unnecessary change upon the neighborhood. 4,P Inappropriate area for apartment houses. 5. Devaluation of property of adjacent property owners. NAME ADDKr:56 2. 3- 4K 4 J,- Ile, . r 5• 9 ate' ? k wcL 7 t o3 r /.3~/~_ aoc~ 990 10. C - O 2- p~ 12. -GS 1 c ~.9d.. 1 -7 ia~ 9 1.} i" / L a o ±J) AIJ~ 12 -7 17, s, j 9 q1 18 Ife- Vq~ 196 20221//'-'f1~1'_1 2A l December d, 1919 inTe~ the undersigned.9 are in opposition to the proposed zone change from agricultural to multiple-family suburban on the property located at: Blake doad east side, 120 feet north of Twentieth Avenue, section 27-25-L~4 with the purposed use of apartments. We are opposed to this change due to the following reaauns: 1. Unfair to those people wno have by choice purchased ,iomes in an agricultural zoned area. 2. Increased traffic on _ut:l avcliue anti Blake road. Ali--a-ay tacrc is a traffic hazard in the area due to the apartment buildin; locUt_dt uri corrlcr oi' r31akE and 20th due to parking alongside the roadways. 3. This area is a primarily single-family dwelling vi c i:-Ii ty az:u ti i c ~j rum ? o s c d apartments would force an unnecessary change upon the neighborhood. fit. Inappropriate area for apartment houses. 5. Devaluation of property of adjacent property owners. NAME AllllAL6u 92, maim • Cv,,~►it.-11--e~t~ I Dr~ f J b 7* Z .99 10. , - 11 • 't~ 'v', S r ~1 , 12. ,13. 7S • ~ C~ ~ r n 17. l` ~ 18, 19* 20,o L December 1y79 4~z ::e, the underuig meda are in opl)osition to the proposed zone change froaa agricultural to natiple-family suburban on the property- located ats Blake load k~,aats+ides 120 feet north of 'Amtieth Wenue, section 27-2!~- 4 with the purl)osed 1 `v L J.L i,iL i.i r.~, .hI lJ..: J~.i ~U .'~4. .._LJ i~rY'.. JJ' LI'..V ~vv ~ .1 . zoned area. z e Increased ti-aff is on ~UtIi avenue anti Blake road. :Uxea4, tuera is a traff iiizard in the area due to the apartment building located on corner of BZakz and 20th due to parking alongside the roadwayse ~s. DiJA area is a primarily single-family Ding vicinity and the pr^no^~5c_ apartments would force an unnecessary change upon the ue Inappropriate area for apartment houses,* 5e Devaluation of property of adjacent property owners. ~~il'. •~illt::: J 19,0 S l 99 S f' 21 C 22 G~A LJ ~.i 1~. z l~ lie l~7Zc►' ' C-'~°-~( 20e 1 I Q S 1Y1 f ,set We uad";r; ened,, are in opposition to the proposed wne change fi.-.-. . agricultural to multiple-family suburban on the property located ats B lAke w"u east side, 120 feet north of Twmitieth Avenue, section 27-25--x- with tae gurposc-Zi n r wLLV v U.:. 1.1AJ. L ...•JU Zoned arr.. _ _ . . _ - - 2. Increased Tr,---.;., haaard in the area clue to the apartment buildix-, and 20th due to parking alongside the roadwayse j. This area is a prim wily single-family dwellinb; apartments would force an unn ceseary change upon tho, nointftr+)ood. 4* Iw.)ropriate area for apartment houses. 5• Devaluation of property of adJacent property owner,. 2"14 , c / 37 / 3 01 ~ st- 30 114 ll. n Q ,V o~ _ / . . , r. 42 n 7" f 1J• 1 -2W 17 3 l 023 /02 vzi e- ~cl G(JA 0 37 • 2 6~ K~ _ G~' !tom D.~ L~ L IA. `~'9©~ OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote November 30 '19 79 Inter-office Communication To Zoning Administr-atQr From County Itrcri near SubjectZE 228-79 # 1 - 101 on Blake Rd. #15 - on Blake Rd. and 20th Ave. #1.9 #20 Form 327-c R 5POI~ANt VALLE(I rinE DEPAnTIAENT ow, OeW ag / EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 RIla December 3, L979 Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator Broadway Centre Building Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone changes have been reviewed for fire protection: ZE-155-79 Bracken ZE-227-79 Spokane County Library ZE-170-79 West ZE-231-79 Stage One Realty Z E - 2 2 8 - 7 9 McCaslin The above need mains and hydrants to be installed. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. Al Cook Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn 0 E1VE DEC 6 19-19 spowiE COUNTYEN~ pLowt G OEPARTM PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES AGENDA, DECEMBER 13, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 1:30 P.M. (contd.) C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS (contd.) 7. ZE-231-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (Nora Avenue, south side, 1,000 feet west of Mamer Road. Section 10-25-44) Proposed Use: 2 Office Buildings/43 Apartments Applicant: STAGE ONE REALTY (2.88 Acres) 8. ZE-228-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Blake Road, east side, 120 feet north of 20th Avenue. Section 27-25-44) Proposed Use: Apartments Applicant: McCASLIN (1.5 Acres) 9. ZW-238-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Lyons Road, east side, 940 feet south of Highway No. 2. Section 25-25-41) Proposed Use: Manufacturing or Warehouse Applicant: TILFORD (5 Acres) 10. ZN-134-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (Northeast corner of Main Street and Railroad Avenue. Section 23-27-43) Proposed Use: 137 Mobile Home Sites Applicant: ROSS (16 Acres) 11. ZS-208-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (Northeast corner of Sherman Road. Section 11-23-42) Proposed Use: Mobile Home Park Applicant: ASTROLITE, INC. (40 Acres) 5:00 P.M. - - - - - ADJOURNMENT A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-20-330(2) provides that: In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E.I.S. shall be prepared'. rjlxcm 0 W Z F W M I N C or a MAML MCI N I N ,6i ` OWNS- vac R ` - _ W R I r 4 ~ - , J Q A o v c f .F JLO N° 2312 f • M RD AVE, • i Our St Q J` M r r 2 Pa rock.a~.~ y . schools . , 4TH AVE. Ion ~ 4' cb~.f Q •t ~ T4 'a ! li T N Tr t 4 J ♦ V L#g" our t 0 b • • 'k F W m 6 T H T M y w Hd C/o d~ , W 7 TM AV Y ~s r~66 `ADAM • 0c J r E 7 TM 71M 7TM . • CHQ 0 T 6 TH AVE N or 06 22 % A. VE t T M Wc , H S ~ ol N t 1 .f. r [ L~l I T I O O ,O 10 T N 1 11 I n- I, AV E _ y E 12T SAVE 12 TH T )pV FTr1 3 g 13Th AVE '~T~ 13 T 0 , mTHI J 2: 4( r ► i 4 13 TH . V Z T NTH _ 12 H A V r Y ? ~1 > Evrf•GREE" r T SIXTEEN AV E J T u) 1 '1 th z t f w a Z o ~ U x ~ 'Y u ' w Y _ 228 79 . rT . s s. • ~L ' U D Ca . 1l~ a •Ih 20TH 21 .-t 1L do ~ ry IV aq 2 2 n d • 11 ~D AV • S w V i, J ? of O ~v 23 rd Z 24TH ~ 24 T" K N • 3 2 •'TH .~i TWENTY-fpu 1 • T 1 23 T h rl N Mm~ T ti _ e 28T"- :1000 i 2b T 64 G PLANNING DEPARTMENT ~ i •wP;7~i ~~i'~b itC ,.•~"~f'j't'~~t BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKANE EpUNTV COURT HOUSE CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1. Department of Ecology 6. 2. Social & Health Services 7. 3. Health District 8. 4. ,/e r0. (JjaAer 9. pov~ 10. FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attach- ed. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: ZE-228-79 This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to be either an interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on Nov- ember 28, 1979. Please respond, if appropriate, on or before December 12, 1979. The subject proposal or action is LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GWIE) should be prepared. De= 13 A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for is,t, to be held in Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. Enclosures Revised 6/1/79 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File # p 9 S►O-.nt COUNTY COUNT .oyes Sec-Twp-Rng 27-LS-414/ Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCIA, requires all state and local governments agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be award of and concer themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional raaes, if necessa r . You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are re evant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these Questions now will help ail agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought.. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until scmetime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: BGa /vC eAse-/A/ Phone Number 9z8- y000 2. Address of Proponent: S. /00,.3 PINES 99 Z/ L 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: ~$POKi4/UL~ ~AU.U TV 044*V.LEYOT. 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: 5. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature):tviVE APE &Z A~Ssl F i &A noloy ld eem Adne Ie~Tu, m '00* J. /0'. S . 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): " Cr4 ?Zr4!> /N 7_;fE _rA&4WE ~Vot.cgv 4b7A e- C #ouT 7a ~Vd ~t/rx7w eA e9etl Ave. AWb AbOWAy7- 7V AW.6 E"r eF .pb . 8. Eszimated -Date for Completion of Proposal: / V~i42 List of all Permits, Licenses or Government -.oorovals ?ec::ireo for the :)rooosal "-'eceral, state inc local - including rezones,': ZAAJE &WAW&F AWAP oe- A"i7s/'TS . ,se 7- :r sraC- - =YPL.-PIA,T'CM .'JACE~UATE, PI-EASE c 71C:-+ aDOI .-~1r1 =AGc~. iOa. Do !ou, or the owner in the event you ao not own *_ne subject land, nave any pians for future expansion, or `urther activity related to or _:nnected Kith this arcocsal' 114: yes, ex;lain: A10 I 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: 0 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, des4ribe the nature of such application form: SEA 7-6A1E dM W&6" CPU&,4776~V . II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . X (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? . . . . . ..X (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? . . . . . . . . . . . (d1 The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site?. X_ (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: d0,r%S7-'kG7-1,0A/ 46: 4W17-5 Itmob ~•~e~/NB- ,4~tER5 ttl/GG c4wSE -Lop" E Q U P~2 CD V ~,P G' - e9F 74,Lc- -To/z- eK WELL as %sA),V7 E ad-se, TE .SbiL E 6 s 1a4) . 7~! 1A~/S' Na T ~s. if-i 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Ma+vbe_ No (a) Air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . . . . . . . . . . (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: o&e-7-O r*? e e1 LE DL zA-Ap Aimee e v ~Sh~a cc~~T ~7` ye eS toe t / dlr- c_ e T ~4 f3 / Gv T fits 3. dater. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe "to (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X_ (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?. . . . . . . . . . (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temcerature, dissolved oxygen or turbidi Vj? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?. . . . . . 2L ig) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either *_hrougn direct auditions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X (h) Deterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seeeage of leachate, pnospates, detergents waterborne virus or bacteria, or other suostances into the around waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available `or public water supplies' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: ~'~A,LST12Xe_T16sV W/LL .PEQIC/oQE F/G~*"-o filTFewls 5EiOTr7 y a*%K£ c5b~1~ ?~ETE~Q/D~ -Tl6/V //y tUtzWD - .P c k.~4-G~ Ty . 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or nuber of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the nubers of any unique, rare or endangered . species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . . . . . . X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area. or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 6. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~L Explanation: ~4/SE ~EyELS w/L G i~L~QEr¢SE 1`6 r4 L.C ✓-0-C. ASSWI*72ES Te7o- kOf4C e- i //ate L~ eESI IJAGSES. /-94E EX r'~iV T O ,Ar-: /N Gie,_c *.S-E BE ~i &W/f/ o! 4-w % - 7. Light and Glare Yes Mavbe NO (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . K Explanation: --SO ,W C A/Ew Se ~c-r2L' c_ .S eF L✓L~-~-~ 6~P ~E 41/c L T T 1'Mb /t/~CrU C3-~G~• 8. Land Use. Yes Maavvb_e No (a) Will the proposal result in the alterat'on of the present or planned land use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: 6J/r--e- H?&i -T/~G.E qe%.G T ~,~•~it/ iP~,G /0 A,b?- _/-DF 1gFA=,=-c-/ iEZ . 4. Natural Resources. Aill the arooosa1 result in: !es "avbe 'le ,;a) Increase in the rate of use of anv natural resources: . . . . . . . . . . . ,b) ~eolet;on of any ionrenewable natural resource? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ _~~idndLiCn: J 10. :Risk of Uo et. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe No release or hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 11. Population. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0Y_ Explanation: 72YaC /AAfe-4-b 4-rte 14vfE.4 z-,/i4,1- A4Ae .4 LCs- /~dG~iQFii'F //Vi✓S TY _ 12. _H_o_u~ss i_n3. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: .41AEk ) /AV S/,y 4r- 4Cwi1 7---S 4-V/L f-- 454E G'~ 'r4-i F c.,) A41 C --W All L c- fFL- G Ea-,' T/A/ 9- %494cZ i~V GL . 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Generation of additional vehicular movement : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? . . . ._Y_ (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _Y (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: T/d'q/AL 1~F~/C!lee rrt®l/P~'ytP~e/~ Liw z- eyvw_s~ LJ/`f f~i4~ lc d/G L G'.P~~E ~>O/yjoMI S BN ,~X/ST/~✓~ Sy~7~i~1S AV 6 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result Yes Maybe No in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other recreation) facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .jr, (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . . . . . . . . . . . X (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . cxolanation: NSF-,i2V/CFS Gi7<!e, 46.E /l49ZEb iEZ ®WD ~t~D i'1?~1~/t=/G~'10rt/ Tl~ Fir/~ST.hi~ SL~7Z~hlS t.~1~L L 6 F i1l,E G Gs s •~•e 7~ 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: Yes Mavoe No (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or reouire the development of new sources of energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X- Exc1anati0n: 1 • y t _ 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, Yes Maybe No or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _~L (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: SewtE r9F 7-AE /-Ptksng-C-"*74 - oNS ~ o .ems c~i~ •rcc~ crr~ec s- ~i,~~ c.4-~~~v. r-- w/~ L .r/o r rre-izs e. Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?. . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or Yes Maybe No view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or Yes Maybe No quantity of existing recreational opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a Yes Maybe No significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building?. Explanation: III. SIGyATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- full misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in r fiance upon this checklist. Date: Proponent: C 1~2A S/- Z A) (Please Print or Type) Prooonent: sob /tee eA-seAddress: cS• /003 ,o//VES . 9Z8- ~fooo ~zi6 Phone: Person completing form: ~Ojfr✓ 5'1-0C-SE Phone: 4Z2 -ZZLZ Date: Deoartment or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: --Z'd t!(~ ^-taff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: -ioin A -4 A mod WBancshares Mortgage Company January 16, 1979 R ECE IV ED Spokane County Planning Department N. 721 Jefferson St. AN 17 198 Spokane, Washington 99260 SPOKANE r m ' T Y PLAWNr, Gentlemen: Enclosed please find correspondence that we are unable to match to any of our records. It will be necessary for you to provide us with our loan number or additional explanatory information to enable us to properly match this correspondence. If this correspondence involves a contract purchaser, would you please advise us of this. When we have been provided with the above information, we will be able to process this correspondence promptly. Thank you for your assistance. Very truly yours, % 6ak-', &'6~ Loan Administration Department Escrow Accounting b Control Section Phone (509) 456-6620 Enclosure S 1 1 r I^ 1 POST OFFICE BOX 2665 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99220 (509) 456-6780 ML-549 + PARCEL #27541-1132 BANCSHARES MTG 1704537 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY D N PERKINS IN THE MATTER CONCERNING ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ZE-228-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAIMILY } NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING SUBURBAN. APPLICANT: McCASLIN ) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County, Washington, will hold a public hearing at 3:00 P.M. ON JANUARY 30, 1980, at its office in the County Courthouse to consider the a ove-mentions zone reclassifi- cation on the following described property: That portion of Block 192 of Vera as per Plat thereof recorded in Volume "0" of Plats Page 30, D.A.F.: The N 1/2 of the S 2/5 of the W 1/2 EXCEPT the E 70 feet and EXCEPT the W 20 feet together with the E 70 feet of the W 1/2 of the S 2/5 and the W 70 feet of the E 1/2 of the S 2/5 of said Block 192 EXCEPT the S 5 feet in Spokane County, Washington. Located in Section 27, Township 25, Range 44 E.W.M. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that a topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether or not this proposal will have a significant adverse environmental impact. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that any person interested may appear at said hearing and present testimony in support of or in opposition to an appeal on said matter filed with the Board of County Commissioners. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD this 7 day of January, 1980. VERNON W. OHLAND CLERK OF THE BOARD B ' s Me Montague, Deputy c er T F T L' Q 173 T h A V EE ~ rn : ~ r 3 nw ar r~ 'TMZ 1 rH A v EYE-GREEN X t/ri,7Rh r A rtr GM t T V IXT E pop 3 t14 GR r T ¢ 9 Z _j or t ( ! ' K a J Y u t> z r'r$V $ LTA S C~ 228 79 4 r=te tw 1, t G. ~ 4 Z ~ ~ J sr ~ 1k[3 r~bp .sra ~ G ~P Z 2a~K 24 T" 2 TH TwFriT Z T sy 2.5 T M N - Lj X ' W Cal i Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses has been prepared from the latest available records and is to the best of my knowledge correct. Signe For: Date: 2 I t 0 ~1 ✓~}754J.- a.137 1L--)WN=ROBT I_ MCCA_;L I N MC CASI.. I N ROBERT L. CODE ~ I RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YP 1003 PINES RD 1.50 . 00 CERT. Div . 00 72. 77 1 40 79 %/FRA PT OF P-19- <J1 r' F 1F 1=f'='~P- FD '~r AL l.IF 9=I. T:~G'il1 OF- Wfl .?2 F;;1 F 70FT.%~F; ;F~ l~a:.=`0FT T ~i ~`r??541- 1.1.3$ OWN=R ESL I ESNFR ETAL. ~I i.. I ESNFR RORER L CODE S I RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR N 1204 RFES RD 150 . 00 CERT. . 00 . 00 72. 77 1.40 79 SPOKANF WA 9921.6 1 . 00 UNPC). . 00 . 00 72. 77 1 VERA FT OF P1.92 5a. r5 OF~ ASSESSED VAI_LIE 79=L 35~~ 0 W1,-0t F~ ;fir F 70FT?~:Et1~`. W;-'0FT8:Fr'C S5FT T 0 4 C r.. --<4. OWN=RORT L MCCA SL IN CA I.. I N RORFRT L_ CODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR a.007. PINES RD 150 00 CERT. 430 430 72.77 1. 40 ;'*9 r-*POKANF WA 99206 1 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 00 3 YFRA PT OF R1.92 E70FT ASSESSED ',VALUE 79=L 3500.1 OF WJ /2 OF S2/5&4170FT OF F.1 r'2 OF S..'5 EXC SSFT I 0 27541-:1140 RFD &JA~AJ OWN=YFRA T RR D I'ST 15 ~O / ~ve,~eeti. FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR CERT. .00 .00 . 00* 1.40 79 UNPD. .00 .00 .00 1 VERA PT OF 8192 55FT ASSESSFD VALUE 79=L. 40 F. XC F20FT&EXC W20FT T 0 27541-1.601 51.902 BLAKE RD OWN=W E BUNTROCK Ivf:UNTROCK TERN &XtqAA~jfCODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR 19432 BLAKE RD 150 38.00 CERT. .00 .00 688.22 140 79 SPOKANF WA 9921.6 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 00 3 OPP TFR 1.1 R ASSFSSEC> VAL. LIE 79=L_ 3400 27541-160;? F13412 WICK AYF OWN=THFO RENN I CK RFNN I CK THEOPH I L CODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COCA YR POX 261 11,50 38.00 CERT. .00 .00 698.61 140 Yf L LEYFORD WA. 99026 3 .00 l INPD. .00 .00 0~_i T OPP TER L2 R2 ASSFSSFD `SAL LIF 79=L r-. ►r 27541- 1.603 Fa 3404 WICK AV F OWN=JACK A MAYF I FL D E:ANCSHARFS MTC CODE S TRR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR MAYF I FI. D JACK A 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 673.66 140 79- J.9. 00 UNPD. .00 .00 .00 3 OPP TFR L.3 R2 AS SF55FD VAl LIE 79=L 290Ci ?7541-1604 E13320 WICK AVF '-&N=FRED I SALITHER - WF1SH MUT SAY SK CODE S T RR FIRE WFFD TAX S F COD YR 01.20231.311.160 1.50 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 806. 73 140 7i? .00 LINPD. 00 00 .00 3 OPP I FR 1.4 R2 AS.SFSSFD VAL LIE 79=L. 3000 /??541-1.608 F13325 SAL.TFSE RD OWN=THOMAS J FAG nN .RAINIFR MTO CODE S IRR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR 400 1 116975 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 663. 26 140 79 3 . 00 LINPD. 00 .00 .100 7 i-)rP TF1? 1 S R2 ASSFrSFi~ VRI 1_IF 79=1 ✓2;'541-1609 k l) ..-f'IG-1 r1=tl .T UF:i~itaFFaTHH! U()MM MT G CO(~F S I RR FIRE WFFD TAX S E COD YR ~13 I 722 38. 00 CERT. .00 00 636. 24 1.4E 7i) .00 LINPD. 00 00 318. 12 2 OPP TER 1.9 P2 ASSESSED 'SAL LIE 79=1__ 0 F-1 27541. -.161. E F1 3421. SAL.TESE RD OWN=GEO M CAL.DWFL.L. rALDWFL 1. GEORGE M DR CODE S I RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR FOX 64 1.50 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 675.74 140 7474 SPOKANE WA 99214 3 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 337. 87 OPP TER 1.10 62 ASSESSED VALUE 79=L 3 10 0 27541-1.611 E13425 SAL. TESE RD OWN=JAMES T MATH I S MATHIS JAMES T CODE S IRR FIRE WEED TAX S F COD YR' F. 1.3425 SAL TESE RD 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 659. 11 1.40 79 SPOKANE WA 992:16 3 .00 LINPD. E~0 .00 .00 3 OPP TER L I 1 Fes' AS.SF S'= FD VAL UE 79=L 3100 /;:-~,-?541- 2857 E13428 20TH AVE ke" OWN=MAXIM A JOF INSTON JOHNSTON MAXIM A CODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD 4'P•. 7,812 R I DGEV I EW DR 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 47,06. 02 140 7'9 SPOKANE WA 99106 3 .00 LINPD. 00 . 00 .00 3 OPPORTUNITY TERRACF 3.RD ASSESSED VAL. LIE 79=L 1.4404 I--ITS 1 &2 P9 I 192700 V/;.-.17541-2705 E13412 SAL TESE RD ~ OWN=D A THOMPSON F ' I D MUT SAKI BK CODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD Y R 1003 22497 3 1.510 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 702.77 140 79 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 351.. 38 2 nrP TFP -Pr.- L 5 F1 ASSF'-SF D OF 79=1 = ^c ~ 1"17541-2706 E13404 SAL TESE RD ~ OWN=L R HERBERT I.. I NC MUT SAV SK 06 CODE S I RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD 4'R 06 001.5472 150 38.00 CFRT. .00 .00 679.90 140 79 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 .00 3 OrP TER 3RD I. F P.I ASSP- SFD ';SAL. LIF 79=L. ?20[_~ 'r.:"', •541- 2707 F13408 SAL.TFSE RD OWN=1 C-:HAL I CH I.. I NC ML IT SAS' 8K 06 CODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD Y P 06 0016109 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 694.45 1.40 79 . 00 L INPD. 00 . 0A- .00 3 OPP TER ?RD 1.7 R1. ASSESSED VAL LIE 79=L. ?204 r. x541. 2708 F13324 SAL TESE RD OWN=KENNETH SYMBOL. PROD I NS CODE S I RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR ;~-1.21-1.25 150- 7P. A r%FF'T nn nn 4 0 _ _ N~r'S C1F W~.~1~ W~'AFT ~ E~" Fa~RF'T ~ T ~ ~~F~A AWN =HRf ~'O~.f:~ L. MR~;E4' .fhA~E4' HF1f~~►l. p 1. C:tlp~ S RR F ~ RE WEEP TRH ~ E C~f~~ 'r f- ~ h~AMER Rp 15f~ ~A. a0 ~FRT, . . f~~ A~ ~ 4A ? ~~E:FtiApRL.f~ hIA '~~A~? . R~ LIhfF'[~. . A~ . AA . AA ~lERR ~1F F~ ~r E'~G RS~F'~SFp ~1Rl..l~E ?'~~L. f::~ AFT R~ ~ ~ ~'7~~~ -'f A~ ~ ~ R!. Af;E RCS t1WN= ~ H PL4E f~F~«KE HFRf~1f1fU F C~1DE ~ 1 RR F ~ RE WEFI~ Tf~~ E ~L11~ YR ~ ?1 ~ BL. Rl~F Rp 3R. ~A ~:ERT. . A#~ . ~A 1 R~. ~ ~ ~A ? a ~'~f'~1fCRNF WR ~~~~.6 ~ . AA ~.}I~Pp. . ~f~ . E~l~' . ~PERR ~1F W 3.r'r E~~~' R~~ESSE[~ 4~AL l~E ?~=L. W~'~1FT R~ I ~A~A~ ,r' ry•~~~~ ~A? RLRI~F Rp ~ ~WN-~ R Wt~MRi~C~ f71..i ~TRI'E EF#TFRPR l Sfr~ ~flC~F F F T RF WEFCi TRH; ~ E Cpp 4'f~: :f.1. 0c? ~E - ~ 5A ~A. R~ CFRT. . . ~~9. ~ a. ~ W~ I~NPp. . ~A . A~ . ~A ~PF TER 1. ? R~ RS ~F'~~El~ '~A1 UE ?~=L, 'a~c~ 'r.'"T541-~ 5F~€~ Fa Rk~4 LPL RKf= R[`, L?WF~=~T p HRMXL.TCIF~ ~~FaF~~~FfRRFF MTV ~L1pF XRR F~f`F WEf=p T~i'~~EC~JpYF~ ``ice ~9 ~A ~ ~A ~'R. AA r"Ff~T. . . 0Ei 5~~. 4'~ 1 AA ~lWP'p. . AR . . i~f~F TFR 1. R R~. RS~F'~~E.p ~RL..I.1E ?~=L_ ~AaA Yj ~'7~~1.- 1.~A~ F~ ~ ~42~ W ~ C`{~ R'~F ``~~WrJ=CHR I ~ M I L I ~Fa I ~ ~~F'A MTt~ L,'ppF Sf~R F~RF WEED TRH S E ~Qp '~R ~f~~51.A~ ~.SA ~8. AA ~:f ~T. . AA . ~A ~f~. ~6 ?4 . WA ~_IFdfip. , A~ . k~A . A~ 3 ~?F`F TER ~ E~:f R~~F;=,FEp ~~RI._LIE ?~=1.. ~~~'~c ~ ~ 54~,-1. `~'f A A~? M~ ~'Rl~F Rp ~i~WN=H W MpFf= ~ TT " ~',C~f~ll"IL!F~I T TY ~~1,. ~0[~E ~ J RR F I RF WEEp TAB ~ E ~:~C.+ 'r'f~ ~~AA~k~~ ~ 9.5A ?'R. A~ FRT. . ~A . S~F~. 9.4~ . AA IJNPp. . ~4~ . AA . ~f~ 4f~'F TER l ~ A R~. RESE~=E[~ '~RL ~.IE ANC ~~~rrf W~ ~ I ~ MSC Ci~f3F WEEP H ~ FJf~FNk~RMR ~ ' ~ ~FlFp. ~ . A~ TRH ti. f 'ixe s . AFE, fiF~ . ►~A A ~~A• ~9 ~ E ,'f ~ ~ - - - ~ r`? 9 ~ ~'GM? f'~t~MFR f~•'p ~1Wfy-p~1NRL.p L. HU~7p t :ClMh~ MTI~ L:l~[~F" ~ ~ RR FIRE WEFt~ TRH ~ E ~:~p 4'f? t~~#A2~?9A ~ ?A, A~ :FRT. . ~A . t~R ELF. ~ ?4 '~FRh~ f~T AF f?~. W~ A R~~F~SEf~ VRL.UE ?~=L a"fi E'~~' °~~+~F~T&E~~ W~'~FT~F~~: fV~'SFT I ?A~:~~ r~, a I 13 ~ S' ~ .j'' W1'?541- 1.130 51902 MAMER RD v QI~IN= _Tt~MN R SCHFlEFEf GOMM MTC; CODE S IRR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR 0000 3945 "*pU .>1~t,- 1.50 78.00 CERT. .00 .00 521. 88 1.40 ?19 3 00 UNFD. 00 00 00 3 -'W~ R1.58 VERA PT OF R1-92 51/3 OF ASSESSED VALUE 79=L 3G.01 N:-.~ .'5 or. F1 /*2 F XC. F2OFT T •,j c ~l.:- . ._iLi , 2?54a a a 1 51.908 MAMER RD ✓ OWN=EN13EL 8, FNGFL_ !:-PO MTr CODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E C 0 D Y P 001.5146 1.50 38.00 CERT. .00 .00 900.29 140 tiL1 I, it ~r'[}. l=1Gi {117 1:741 'v'FF'A PT -~F F;-1 ra1.::=' I IF ASP FC:f '.e'HL I..IF 9=I. ,'5 L_IF F-1 Fr;C W?IFT..F C E20FT ? 1k7541-1 J. 32 E'1.3819 20TH AVE Al`OWN=D N PERK I N BANCSHARES MTC CODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD 'T R 1.704637 150 -18. 00 CERT. .00 .00 505.25 140 7'_± 2 19.00 LINPD. .00 .00 .00 3 VERA PT OF a192 S1/5 ASSESSED VALUE 79=L 2900.1 LIF E1 Fr C. W16.0F T8:FXC S5FT.Y':F;, 17. F20FT I ^1 : liGi 7541 ° a 13-3 E13609 20TH AVE 4--EL i%'OC { .FC T NTERMTN CODE" S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COP, 216-636004-0 150 38.00 CERT. .00 .00 598.81. 1 4 Ci T 00 I.INPD. llll 2994 40 c' '-r'FRA PT OF F:1 9'c' F 9 0 F T H'='= F FC:'~r Al I_IE r '?=L ~ :1_il~ OF W1.60- FT OF =•1 /5 OF F1.• 2 FXC S'F"T T '7541-1..134 51.805 Pl. AK.E RD OWN=DA~r I D L. BURC:H ;MMUNTTY S&L. CODE S. IRR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR `.5001615 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 802.57 140 9 00 I..INPD. 00 .00 .00 - 'v ERA Na r'5 OF W1. / FXC ASSE=SSED VALUE 79=L ~ 1=1 Fl W20_ FT P192 1 ?50C10 • 541 1 .j ->5 S J ' 7 1 ~.1 ~c ~ BL.Af~:E RE) OWN=L W WH I TL ~~iTf~ : M I I TL. OCK L-E I GHTON CODE S T RR F T RE WEED TAX S E COD 'T F' a 8a 5 RL AKE RD 150 -18.00 CERT. .00 .00 424.16 141 - ::J`OKANF WA 99216 3 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 .00 VERA PT OF P192 5112 OF ASSESSED VALUE 79=L_ 3700 N2r-`5 OF W1,'2 FXC W2 0FT&N28FT OF S1. /3 OF N.-~/5 OF Wa. ;'2 FXC 44E 0FT T I.5700 r V'2'?54a. - 1 a ?6 S1825 PL.AI F RD i_IWN=NFAL G B UCk::AL Fri-1 E- OC'KAL OO NEAL. REV CODE S T RR F T RF WEED TAX S E COD YR 1825 PL AKE RD J50 00 :FRT. .00 00 580. 1.0 140 7'9 ~ POKANE Wn 99216 00 Lit4F'C:+. 1 ~ l'!l CIO if 27541. 1346 51 81. Mf;MER RCS f OWN=RAL PH A LIPHIJ i.. I NC MUT SAV SK 06 CODE S. I RR FIRE wr FD TAX 5 E COD YR 069 0021.661 1.54 38. 00 iC:FRT. .00 .00 671.58 140 .''9 . 00 LINPD. 00 . 00- . 110 71 AL L. FY H T'_= RFjD l 1. P 1. A'= F,=,'= E r- A 1. I..lE L N/27541 . 1347 51823 MAMER RCS OWt =F-HF r- R BATES I.. T NC MUT F-AV RK 06 CODF S T RR F I RF WFFD TAX s E COD YR 2423 X 150 38. 00 CFRT. .00 .00 731.88 140 7,.. .00 IINPD. .00 .00 .00 3 VAL. L.FY HTS ADD L? 81 ASSFSSFD VAt.L1F 79=L 7.2-00 -'7541- :1-348 Sa 905 MAMER RCS OWN=L. A HANSEN ~7:PO MTC CODF S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR 1000268 1.50 S. 00 CERT. .00 .00 709.01 140 79 .00 UNPD. .00 .00 .00 3 R158 VAL.L.FY HTS ADD L.3. R_1 ASSESSED VALUE 79=L_ 3200 '7541- :1345 51911 MAMER RD ' OW N=D D RIB I'''=F r' l D MUT SAV ELK CODE S I RR F T RF WFFD TAX S F CC-)D 'r R 110E -078 8 1.5E 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 723.56 140 79 .0-0 LINPD. .00 .00 761. 78 2 VAL L FY HT'S ACED 1 4 R'1 FS.S.F D VAL. LIE 79=L. -:2,0c- V 27541-1-350 51921. MAMI R RD OWN=N A PR I CKETT WASH Ml IT SAY SK CODE S T RR FIRE WFFD TAX 5 E COD YR (10101.2(1048580 150 .38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 700.69 140 79 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 .00 3. VAL. l..FY HTS ADD L. 5 R1 ASSESSFD VAL. UE 79=L -74'G~10 r' "54a - :1.1.25 51.806 MAMER RD OWN=H t. MAXEY MAXEY FIAROL D L. CODE S I RR F I RF WEED TAX S E COD YF' 1806 MAMER RD 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 731. 88 140 79 VFRADA[E Wn 49037 3 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 .00 2. VERA N1/5 OF F1./2 EXC ASSESSED VALUE 79=L 36OL-1 I:';?0FT F1.92 T ?1 r,~i~~ , ' x'.7541- 1.1 29 OWN=HAPOL D L tlA E'T MAXEY HAROL. D L. :ODE S I RR FIRE WEED TAX 'S E COD YR 1.806 MAMER, RD 15E .00 CFRT. .00 .00 74.85 14C-1 7_=+ YFRADAI. F WA 99A-Z7 1 00 1. INPD. 00 00 .00 VERA '~a r'2 OF Nn/5 OF ASSFSSFD YAL.UE 79=L 60L1 'J/2 F XC E20FT 8192 T ► OPP T FR -fRD L 8 P1 ASSF'= FD VAL. I_IF 79=L. 7200 6"?7541-9005 S2025 RL AKF RD OWN=R W MALLOY Mnl.L OY ROBERT W CODE S T RR FIRE WEED TAX S E i-:OD 'T F' 2025 F►L..AKE RD J50 38. 00 CERT. .00 .20 1278. 71. 1 40 71=1 'POKANF WA 992-1 #5 0 LINPD. 00 0 2 5 44 NW1.,'4 OF '=.F1:'4 OF ASS-FS. S E D VAL LIE 79=L IF-000 NUI r4 FXC F370FT S OF CFN L. N VAC SAL TESF RD&FXC E368FT OF PTN I 55500 LY0 N OF CFN L. N VAC SAL TFSE RD BY ENG FILE 2173 T 61500 %(2.' 41-9006 OWN=R W MALLOY - MRL.L._OY ROBERT W FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR 2025 BL. AKF RD CERT. .00 .22 137. 23 144 79 c'POKRNE WA 99216 LINPD. .00 .00 .00 3 27 25 44 E370FT OF NW1/4 ASSESSED VALUE 79=L 6604 OF SFa /4 OF NE1 r4 S OF CEN L .N OF SAL. TFSE RD VACATED BY ENG FILE I O 21.73 T 660 0 2?541-9 004 E1.3610 20TH AVE OWN=D M _Tl-IRDAN MAL.LOY ROBERT W CODE S T RR FIRE WFFD TAX S E COD 'T`F' 2025 RL. AKE RD 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 62. 38 f140 79 .PnKANF WA 9921.6 -f c~O INPD. OO ~3~-1 00 27 25 44 W248FT OF F36SFT A_=•SFSSED VALUE 79=L 71OOC-1 OF NW1:'4 OF SF1.:'4 OF NF1,'4 L YG N OF CEN L. N OF SALTFSE RD VACATED I ENS; F I L E 21.7-7 T :1-100 i x'7'541.-9003 Fl 3E.20 20TH AVF OWN=P S FERGUSON FlSH M!T SAV BK CODE S IRR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR 01302 -~a 083610 1.50 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 392. 97 1410 79- .00 LINPD. .00 .00 .00 3 27 25 44 E12 E FT OF NWJ ,'4 ASSESSED VAL.LIE 79=L. 30or-.1 t ~1.. tiE1r'4 OF NF1.r4 N OF CFN L_N OF SAL.TESE RD VACATED BY ENG FILE I 15900 21.73 T 1.8900 ~2r541 - 1.455 F13712 20TH AVE OWN=JAMES T ANTHONY ? -PO MT CODE S I RR FIRE WEFD TAB{ S E COD YR 0015098 150 38. Flo CFRT. .00 .00 111.6.5-1 1 40 79- 7, L INPD. ~ t AOn 00 ' VAL L_ FY HTS ADD L 5 P-2 ASSFSSFD VAL I_IF 79=L -0C-1A 7541. - :1.456 F1 _ 702 20TH AVF OWN=DALE H KLEMMER 1'L. EMMF"R DFIL. E H CODE 5 I RR FIRE WEED TAX S E COD YR F: 13702 20TH AVE 150 38. 00 CERT. .00 .00 F. 65. 34 1.40 79 VFRADnl. E Wn 99037 3 .00 LINPD. .00 .00 .00 3 VAI Y HTS ADD L. 6 P2 ASc- ;ED VALUE 79=L C. 10 0 AFFIDAVIT OF' ` AILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) } SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) c ~ ' Being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United StatesndfoAmerica and a resident of the State of Washington, age of eighteen years. / Tha t on the ,I day o f u'r ' the United States mail at 1979, I personally deposited in with sufficient postage prepaid, a true nd correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached reference, to the hereto and incorporateownerse and/or taxpayers, as shown recorded real property on the Spokane County Treasurer's records 19 of~ Who day of ' have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled propeite and did notice adjacent property owners to t certified mail. The notices were addreassindicat dose individuals and sented° hereto a drincorporated herein by the attachment attach reference. day o i P 19~ DATED this • day of SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this 19~. NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE CO TY, W NGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington ICATION NUMBER ' ~y ~ APPL AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on ~P) 1979, he personally posted a true and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane County, to-wit: )CV Applic nt or Agent Subscribed and sworn trq me 19ly. Vwc~ NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE C TY, rHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington 2'z . C~C~ Fo... cow i F W 04 ~M ; j IhL CI N V ` M L[ ►J J ` - N° 2312 a. , \ ~ + r Q ~ w~ 5♦ M r 2.. ~ Pa rocthi n . I~► w Sc1•ao1■ _ 4 T H AVE. J T a C/OlWt T H AVLWI purl G n L7 6 ~w .t W m g 6 r.y r~ r' Y HO C/o OJ W r 7Tn AvE 7 TI1 ~D es l766940) 7t►w 7TH `A~AM r ' -SJ;Ho 0 8 TN AVE ki u ° IGN1 22 • ~ T OT ; t ~ i 10 T" K) t 0 N t t , Lb I l i- _ ~ ~ 7N y ~ J A E 12T SAVE 12 TH T F T H Z Q3 13 TH AV F- r ~ I i T'N 13 T ~ t , J m~ THi ` V _ 3iTH z t T NTH ` 15 N AV W t a~ of L/a,7, ; 1 x E LE AV E p y W th , Q to 1 T I O W Y f Ad& z" v uJ W s I 1 e I" R ,E 4 n,, 228 79 4*- O G ty . ~,R.. r~.v 1 h q u 22 i,d t LAM ,~o A% ,h • ~v b23 W i 24 1►+ 24 T" Or N 3 2 TN TwFNTY•fOu 257 H t1 N L b T t^1 T r1 r - Ql ~ LT N I ' Fn \ I '4.~._._ h+ 1 _ 1000 2 6 T ►a H N 28 T H G FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: /0 07 - 79 Application No: Z~- ZZ S- 79 Name of Applicant: 90,9 ~GLof*SL//✓ Street Address of Applicant: S• /0 40S //DES /eb. City: _ St4:50' State: • Telephone ho . 9Z~- ~O_Q Existing Zoning Classification: ~iQ~ ~GLTL~~'/C Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 4/2 Existing Use of Property: VAd)q/V / Proposed Zone Classification: f S • Proposed Use of Property: ~11ft7- ' 4e1- T.S' Legal Description of Property: 7#261 192krIVA/ /F B"e) /9Z Of ✓O-C#4 AS 7-Aegy,eOF AEeog b Eb //v ✓ocu me "'01' 4'r Pe*T.s '0'+~ o, A 647 TIDE OF 7; Ye .S 121. OF rhiE w Xz e xc,40T r# E. 70 feET• hAlb FA WEPT Tim W n7,0 fEET . n ~rf T~E~C W ♦ ss/ E E. 7D fE6T or- TffE W 1/2, OF TAE S o2ls- 4,v b 7;vE w. 7o IcEE r OF T4ze- ,j5 /z dF 7We S ~s AC SAib Icock 1094Z 4~7xC95Pr TWO s s FEET. Si 7UA-F -e Div ~s/~,t E e6".#y rY . w"I.44*e 7-pAr/ Section: 7 Township Z S Range: Source of Legal: AS.SF sS0 ~2 S 'T x ee-eegDSO Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) c97.54(/-//3-7 40- c;-7 Property Size: A 57 tfejeArs Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: WOME Street Address of the Property: S• ZOeo BLOB dF 84Alre eta Who Holds Title to the Property: ,80 ,03 /V Pi4S L IA/ If you do not hol title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. -1- Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel, make this proposal warranted? Laa. Ala a,,~ ze -oze-7- L--, 2 . What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? ,t/d ifb &/"45,e #*-F e'eTS 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) ,C&. /Al7-,,C--VJ Ty t,._•¢i✓,6 At-ne IAA Tif 16654 / .Sa- CW 4,-5 :~WD F/¢s.r Y lf*.6 mui-T/ coke eC4% 1e- Z Ir Or 6if ilj " Gdt~.c.s E D e"-oi6rze u-s 6 E~h 4L zoL Q/r T I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. . Bog 5C44A,~= (Signed) A9-If- 79 (Date) - 2 - File # Sec. T'sh' , 17 P R 9 e Classification 7y `Mi, Proponent S P O K A N E C O U N T Y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subse- quently been reviewed by the The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Actions(s) Requested: Zone Change / Preliminary Plat Approval ; Final Plat Approval Change of Condition ; Other B. Description of Proposal: J10 f oeOPO-s,jo v= cc) PA~T - p~'C ! S ! T- fit) i U ~S f~~iC1lV L ,4-~►-~ _.t_ T~ C f~~f .cam e•~~ d F C A-1 C. Location of Proposal: II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) Air (9) Natural (16) Utilities Resources (3) Water (10) Risk of Upset (17) Human Health (4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Recreation (6) Noise (13) Trans/Circ (20) Arch/Hist (7) Light/Glare (14) Public (21) Other Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: evise~ C; 1 i i`" APP C. Discussion of impacts identified above: H 5~ . d J, A Ja, -n e,- 7~ LYP Q/t ~iYli~i'7 Ia 111. Conclusions and Recommendations: zc` -o2-2S- 75 Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of non- significance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recom- mends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. 0011Y IV. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: Y67 ` - - -10"W--49-~ Revised 6/1/79 ZONING WORKSHEET Form C Application # ZE - Zug' This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to present a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed below ) PART I - to be completed by Spokane County Engineer A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: Yes No. 7z 2) cce s s to be limited to: 3) ccess permit is required. r 4) a. edication for right-of-way is required feet on Road, , ) b . Radius ( ---moot) is required. (On and Road, Street, Avenue.) C. -dope easement is required , S) -drainage Plan is required. on-site 0~'C off-site. 6) Paving Permit is required. feet on a L_ d- ~d Road.) U 7) Curb is required, (along Road, Street, Avenue.) 8) l Sidewalk is required. (along Road, Street, Avenue.) 9) Applicant must be willing to participate in future LID/RID. 10) ---~~gal description is acceptable as reviewed. Parcel No. Comments: 7 ell S'gn Date . ; ZONING WORKSHEET--continued-2 Ti - - rr t.-- r Lli r TT 1, -1-; - 1. tI- 1il 1.1C11 li LiiIci ii and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development his not located i r, - operated and maintained by Spokane. County. 2) A storm drainage plan jwis not required for the proposal. Comments: /)j to- ~y S igned Da to PART III- to be completed by Spokane County Water Purveyor A , Water Suppl 1) The proposed development is located with the ✓E OR 1A/ATvk_ Pom I CA district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory rit/arrangement gars/has not been made to serve this proposal. 3) We are/ate-ne4 able to supply this development with adequate potable water. Fort S,iv6,L(_ FANN)LY Oft DwC LL1AA%.T. 4) We are/amt able to supply this development with adequate water for fire flow. Foz rAr,%)L T' ore ouPLIZx pwELi,#1VjS5. WA7-CYZ MA"N EXTE;Vs+ovS k10Vc.n QC 4CQVi/tk13 For, p--w L K V S& s • 5) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other. 6) Water system is/is not under State Utilities jurisdiction. 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: 4 inches. 8) Dista ce to main: O feet. 10 - P-77 A _be completed bv B. 1) Individual water supply will be develop dwith/ ithou t fire protection capabilities. Comments: Signed Date C. If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Der '_-M °i:t JCC1 r`i1ceS mu'S_ r ~1 1 rn U'( r -1Jf ~*,r,11r F? i_ 1) I/~Ve have reviewed the proposal. It appears to meet Mate requirerrents for public water. Signed - D,S..S. ZONING WORKSHEET continued-3 PART IV - to be completed by Spokane County Fire Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District # 2) Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Fire flow i Z!~not dequate for proposed development nd ' /is not required. 4) S Main (s) need to be installed. s ~..S Hydrant (s) need to be installed. 6) AJA Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) 7) Nearest fire hydrant is feet. 8) Driving distance to nearest fire station is Comments: ;24t) c)4 A-A ZA4kLW Signed Date PART V - to be completed by Spokane County Health District A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: , 2) Air quality is not concern with this proposal 3) Ground water quality/is not a concern with this proposal. 4) Noise is/ s not concern with this proposal. S) Lightpis not a concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: 1 Signed Date _ ~c~?~ ; m~ r t i= ~