The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-232-79 ~ r ZONE/PUD RECLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST Contact: r File # PART I ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership) 6 ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION, (F or m A) ZONING WORKSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PLOT PLANS (5) SIGN PLAN LANDSCAPE PLANS (5) GRAPHICS PACKET SLIDES (minimum size film 126) (date) APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS ' (date) PAR T-1-1 COUNTY AGEN(,iLS IvOiil'iLij NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPED, (date) ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT date STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST STAFF ANALYSIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING (A Sign - 4x4) (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) (date) ANALYSIS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PART III HEARING EXAMINL'R COMMITTLE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUI=? (C] a BONDING (Landscape) ALCL'PTEI - - RETURNEI (da te) PMONr 'BALL DATE TIME TAKEN BY NAME _ APARTMENT ADDRESS PHONE REMARKS oc" SERVICE WANTED CALL GIVEN TO ROUTE STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY WASHINGTON Mail Stop PV-11 206/753-2800 f'y Dixy Lee Ray Olympia, Washington 98504 fig Governor tyhu R E C E I V E NOV 3 1980 T0: SPOKANE COUNTY FROM: 00 ( PLANNING DEPARTMENT The Washington State Department of Ecology headquarters office (Olympia) has received and recorded the following "Notice of Action Taken" pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. This notice is now on file and available for review upon request. Acting agency: 44A~4~ Type of action taken: Project: tu&eoj. E~- 1 0? ~o fl 7 led - 7 d Date received: & o~-O l9~U DOE f i le number: NAT- FQ 103h' This letter indicates only filing of the notice of action with the Department of Ecology. It does not indicate concurrence with the format or contents of the notice, or compliance with all provisions of RCW 43.21C.080. If you have any questions, please contact the Environmental Review Section, (206) 753-6892. ECY 010-4-50 Rev. 6/78 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON, COUNTY OF SPOKANE, ......................a being first duly sworn Notice of Action by tin on oath deposes and says that he is the......... MIMR Spokanecou" of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekly newspaper. That said news- Hearing Exwnlnw Comrntnee paper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six Pursuant to the provisions 01 Chapter 43.21C months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to. published RCw noose is hereby given that the Spokane County Harting Exeminer Committee aid on Jan. in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County. +o. 1980. action tie the action described bet y o Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office wischallenge wehdeaction o review the grounds of maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which non.cornphance wrdi the pc"sions of Chapter said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Su- 43.21C RCw (State Enworiniental Policy Act) ,,rubecommenredon0d2e.t9so.orbebaned perior Court of the State of Washington in and for Spokane County. That the The action taken by the Spokane County HOW- a1g Examiner Committee. notice Of ~is thereby given, was as follows (1) Approved Action zone P;egMittoattOri Re- annexed is a true copy of a ,;ptj_4gg.-0f-_-.'jQtj.+).-.......-.---•--.---...-. . quest. County File No. ZE-232.79. (2) Description. Agricultural Suburban to Residential OffcO (3) Such action pertained to prop" commonly known asanarordescribed as East 12W7Approx: as it, was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form), of said he" way between Pines Road and Bowdish Road on the South side of Main Street (4) Pertinent documents may be examined dur- newspaper once each week for a period of tA10....................... consecutive Ing normal county tx,srness tours at the Spokane County Planning Department. N 721 Jefferson sires:. Spokane. Washington 992e0 . Phone (5091 w 466-22o5 eeks, commencing on the E!"nd...day of........... OQ.tober............_..., 19$p..-. . Notice given by Gary Fields Filed by M O G<MSChelk. 89W to-22-10-29 and ending on the....,c 9th........day of........... ...uCt4ber 19$4--- both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers during 11 of said riod. Subscr nd sw.~m before me this ..................29 L.........................day of Q9: 0 !!A . . t9.4q N n ublic in and for the State of W ington, Residing at: Spokane, WA County File 7 9 Sec. 15 n ge 5 T' ship 4_ AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S.S. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) pkv~ j - S , being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. c,J L~{0~~ , 19 , I That on the / day of d!~~) personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspi- cuous manner on the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which is the subject of the ACTION, to wit, the following locations: 1. A-, 2. C-0-t . 3. C-A a"ale-42- c. 4. DATED this J day of ~~C.~r_-•?~t, 19 1 AN SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this / day of N tar 1,V 1-rf- a~d for tIkS t a t e of ashington resid ng at Spokane Rev: 4/17/79 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ye s being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the day of c a-iZ, 1J. CA I personally deposited in the United States mail at j ~11L 365 4L ~ L'A , with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF ACTION, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to Department of Ecology. DATED this day of 19~. SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this., ,day-,of - ~C% , 19 4 N, a y ubl - an Cdr , e tate ,ef Washinatov, resid ng at Spokane Rev: 8/14/79 PLANNING DEPARTMENT i Ai_ •`"•`"r_ BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET 41.1 Ir .S i6 4JC r l~~v r h - PHONE 456-2205 n In r. SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 :'Q KAN[ COUNTY CJL RT HOLSE CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1. Department of Ecology 2. Social & Health Services 3. Health District 4. Audubon Society 5. KREM TV 2 6. Mr. Ray Card, 208 Coordinator 7. Modern Electric Water Company 8. Fire District #1 FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260, (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: GARY FIELDS ZE-232-79 This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to be either an interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on December 26, 1979. Please respond, if appropriate, on or before January 9, 1980. The subject proposal or action IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be prepared. A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for January 10, 1980, to be held in Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. Enclosures Revised 12/1/79 ile No ZE-232-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 10, 1980, and the members of the Committee present being John Culler, Chairman, Kenneth Kennedy and Paul Sceva, Jr , and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change, Max Gottschalk, applicant's agent for a Zone Reclassifeation, Agricultural Suburban to Residential Office for the purpose of offices B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the existing land use in the area is residential, commercial, and undeveloped 2 That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential neighborhood development 3 That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural Suburban. 4 That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with 5 That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled 6 That this proposal is not 'in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion 7 That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification 8. That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area 1 ile No ZE-232-79 9 That the owners of adjacent lands expressed disapproval of the proposed use 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare C ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Gary Fields for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be approved Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 Mains and hydrants need to be installed Access plans for firefighting equipment shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1 Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Main Avenue for right-of-way and slope easements as necessary. 2 Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Main Avenue 3. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project 4 The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. 2 ile No ZE-232-79 c) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 Depending upon total sewage flow design, this project may require approval of the sewage system by RE-DSHS and require effluent disposal in non-paved areas e) SEPA 1 That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43 21C 080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. f) ZONING 1 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes- Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained 2. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits 3 The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant There- fore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee 3 ile No ZE-232-79 4. Landscape maintenance provisions and a performance bond shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator to accompany the landscape plan as identified on the site plan, prior to issuance of building permits for this site g) 208 1 This proposal recommends ground infection of untreated stormwater runoff 2. This proposal includes too little or no open space to accommodate use of grassed percolation areas for stormwater runoff disposal 3 This proposal does not mention the Recommended Action of double plumbing and stub-outs to the appropriate property line 4. This proposal should submit, for approval, storage, spill control, drainage, fire prevention, and cleanup plans h) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non- signifi-cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance. Motion by. Sceva, Jr Seconded by. Kennedy Vote Unanimous H IN EXAM I R COMMITTEE 2 airman ATTEST. FRED L DAYHARSH , Planning Director By: 4 : I PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JE; FERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 - File # ZE-232-79 i•.NE L,7r H~ HI- .SSE Section 15 Township 25 Range 44 Classification: Agricultural to Residential Office Application Title: Gary Fields T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N VPROPOSED ►,,NON-SIGNIFICANCE DECLARATION OF INAL SIGNIFICANCE 1. Description of Proposal: Two (2) office buildings; 2 story with 13,500 square feet; one story and basement with 18,856 square feet. Building designed to minimize amount of excavation and fill conforms to topography. 83,968 square feet with 227.2 feet frontage. 2. Proponent: Gary Fields 3. Contact Person: Allen L. Largent Phone: 928-1860 4. County Action Requested: Zone Reclassification 5. Location of Proposal: South of and adjacent to Main Avenue, East of Pines Road, West of McDonald Road. 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environ- mental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declarat' Name: Fred L. Dayharsh Name: Chair Signature: Signature: Title: Director Title: Chai an Dept: Spokane County Planning Dept. Dept: Hearing Examiner Committee Date: December 26, 1979 Date: January 10, 1980 1 CARLISLE 1 0 ~y i ow M A I Av F- 5 H ~o Mr N G MEAT ' J 9G - Z O V C 0 Z . ec'o••r I ~fl. I MI SSI ON A . L ~j Axw E x ; s ~ e►EL L Somro 1 t Z t I►dr - Y f ! _ 32_795- 2 Kv W i 0 .c O E S w+ E T G _ • x = OES M ET AV E ` a L1TAL O ~ATAI_DU 0 t > CZ-1-Z ADO O; J flak t N U tn: Q a 16 El- Z Qines :1linsoi d w K AV ALK I gh~cl~~ FA L n vlr AvI W J ~ G a - m A1_LEY WAY VA LLEY NA Z I Q ~ O (1 ' . I ~ MO~r'V O 1,d E ~ AIN C9 E a M I a ~ ; x Z ? z o c. ~n =A£L. 1993 60 E L . ~99 I' SPRAGUEr~AVEr. J~ 2 312+ I i • PCS T `FI CE' ► . AVE 41.LROA D f IRO '•,y Q - t ' I FOURTH AV ` 4TH Cr Y 1000Q 2 L o i GTH S A T H 3 sIx e-~^VE AVL" T vr. t ns I C7 u~~ 7 7 n LV F ~t1 1 STAFF REPORT DATE: JANUARY 10, 1980 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-232-79 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Gary Fields STATUS OF APPLICANT: Purchasing Property PROPERTY OWNER: Hugh Smith a REQUESTED ZONING: Residential Office EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural Suburban I f PROPOSED USE: Office complex PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located on the south side of Main Avenue approximately 1,950 feet east of Pines Road. 11. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 1.92 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS: The site is undeveloped and currently being filled in with dirt and concrete. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Neighborhood is currently a mixture of single family dwellings and more intensive multi-family and office uses. LAND USE: Site Undeveloped North Single family residence East Single family residence and undeveloped West Apartment complex South Commercial ZONING: North Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 East Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 Multi-family Suburban, established, 1976 Commercial, established, 1974 West Residential Office, established, 1978 South Commercial, established, 1959 23 1 l ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOI\ JMBER: ZE-232-79 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential neighborhood NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: Vacant NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: Two Total Square Feet Approximately 32,356 sq. ft. Percent of Coverage 20.7% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 2 stories PARKING REQUIRED: 81 PROVIDED: 86 III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Commercial uses currently exist to the south along Sprague Avenue, with less intensive office and multi-family uses to the north providing a buffer to residences in the area. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. No comments received. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Main Avenue for right-of-way and slope easements as necessary. 2. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Main Avenue. 3. Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 4. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. 24 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOl' JMBER: ZE-232-79 IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Depending upon total sewage flow design, this project may require approval of the sewage system by RE-DSHS and require effluent disposal in non-paved areas. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. f) ZONING ; 1. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accord- ance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 2. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 3. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. 4. Landscape maintenance provisions and a performance bond shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator to accompany the land- scape plan as identified on the site plan, prior to issuance of building permits for this site. as 5POI~ANE VALLEq FIRE DEPARTMENT s^4~ &&"* 74e, ;Vw ~w Oe~W eA. / R EAC 'ETTED • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 1980 R>~ l Xi& eAV JAN ~ SPOKANE COUNTY January 3, 1980 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission Second Floor Broadway Centre Building N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines: The following Zone Reclagsifications have been reviewed for fire protection:' ZE-177-79 B & K Partnership ZE-252-79 Groesbeck ` AZ-172-79 C & T Inves=ents ,l ZE-232-79 Fieln ZE-242-79 Sullivan Group ZE-257=79 H31116"tead Keto Investments Mains and hydtants need to be installed iri this area. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the building shall be approved prior to bbuilding permit issuance. S • r Lt. of Insp'eators . AC:sn PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES ilk I'D C ` FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE 41 N. 811 Jefferson n""~ 456-5786 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON )SMI 99260 r it 'V, - December 27, 1979 5 PO WANE i; ri; l.TO: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS FOR JANUARY 10, 1980 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall be required and approved water plan is required prior to any land development. The above requirements shall apply to the following: ZN-134-79, ZE-177-79 ZE-252-79 ZW-172-79 ZE-232-79..,-- ZE-242-79 ZE-257-79 LD/ba v J AN P spoN 1880 ~ANNgNE N~ ~ECpuNTY ~RIMEN t The O ~ e ~,~ath~rr w ~ J Newman c I t lake y IHayden lake 1-` Foeur Alone r' I Lake libert Ceeer lake ( d'Alene Spokane Aquifer Study N-811 Jefferson SpokaNe, Washington 11261 (509) 456- 3600 APPLICANT: ~ i LEAD AGENCY: oor COMMENT DUE DATE: Comments on Proposed Action: In order to facilitate our review of projects for their conformity with the '208' Recommended Actions we have developed the following checklist. The checklist is based on problem areas addressed in the Water Quality Management Plan. This proposal includes an aquifer penetration which does not conform to ❑ Recommended Actions. This proposal includes activities which may generate solid waste or sludge ❑ which could pose a disposal problem. The proposed solid waste/sludge disposal methods are inconsistent with the ❑ Recommended Actions. This proposal recommends ground injection of untreated stormwater runoff. 2,-~his proposal includes too little or no open space to accommodate use of ° l grassed percolation areas for stormwater runoff disposal. This proposal includes activities which may result in spills of critical ❑ materials in the course of storage and handling. Spill prevention and clean up measures do not conform with Recommended Actions. This proposal may require the transport of critical materials. Precautions ❑ which conform to the Recommended Actions need to be taken. ❑ This proposal provides for disposal of sanitary waste using methods inconsistent with the Recommended Actions. ...~...r. ~C- "_.~.~~1.iYia ~Y~L.C#Ya./W'7EifYY....v~~s~r<s r~~.■ _.--v a~irs~.r.w :~.o.. , Comments on Proposed Actions cont. -2-. ❑ This proposal provides for a type or density of development inconsistent with the Recommended Actions for the location indicated. This proposal is not consistent with the Recommended Action of encouraging ❑ fill-in development. This proposal does not mention the Recommended Ac on of double plumbing D'and stub-outs to the appropriate property line. This proposal does not mention the Recommended Action requiring covenants ❑ or deed restrictions for grading, drainage or site plans. ❑ This proposal should be located outside the Aquifer Sensitive Area. This proposal should submit, for approval, storage, spill control drainage, [D'fire prevention, and cleanup plans. This proposal should include leak prevention and/or detection provisons ❑ including impervious containment provisions. ❑ This proposal may use chemicals that need special containment provisions. =p I' { PLANNING DEPARTMENT I, t BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET riyL f PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE. WASHINGTON 99260 SPO AP1E CCU.:.',CO 1a1 HouSE CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1. Department of Ecology 2. Social & Health Services 3. Health District 4. Audubon Society 5. KREM TV 2 6. Mr. Ray Card, 208 Coordinator 7. Modern Electric Water Company 8. Fire District #1 FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: GARY FIELDS ZE-232-79 This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to be either an interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on December 26, 1979. Please respond, if appropriate, on or before January 9, 1980. The subject proposal or action IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY '208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be prepared. A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for January 10, 1980, to be held in Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. Enclosures Revised 12/1/79 -i PLANNING DEPARTMENT BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKA14L COUNTY COJHT HOUSE File # ZE-232-79 Section 15 Township 25 Range 44 Classification: Agricultural to Residential Office Application Title: Gary Fields T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N ~WON-SIGNIFICANCE \XROPOSED DECLARATION OF FINAL SIGNIFICANCE 1. Description of Proposal: Two (2) office buildings; 2 story with 13,500 square feet; one story and basement with 18,856 square feet. Building designed to minimize amount of excavation and fill conforms to topography. 83,968 square feet with 227.2 feet frontage. 2. Proponent: Gary Fields 3. Contact Person: Allen L. Largent Phone: 928-1860 4. County Action Requested: Zone Reclassification 5. Location of Proposal: South of and adjacent to Main Avenue, East of Pines Road, West of McDonald Road. 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environ- mental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name: Fred L. Dayharsh Name: Chairman Signature: Signature: Title: Director Title: Chairman Dept: Spokane County Planning Dept. Dept: Hearing Examiner Committee Date: December 26, 1979 Date: January 10, 1980 5 X ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File +Y o"nood NYa►v Nuor NV.{ Sec-Twp-Rng Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governments agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a nor action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts,will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be award of and conger themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are requ r , or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional Rages, if necessa . You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriat;- County department. State law requires explanations for ever "Yes" and "maybe" answer on th checklist. The person completing the form' may be required to provide explanation for 'no' answers, an in some caste:, morg detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, gust answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: §J',-RY F 1 E Lp2 Phone Number 9241- g899 2. Address of Proponent: = / Mfc.d 990 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 11-1°f - 1y 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: wbKjwaL CoyNTr F6Mw Nt5 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: 6, Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate and rsta Ina of its cope 8nd nature S T%Vo _p OToaY w/1 SCoSF 1e51g1Jfv-1~C M,Ne AF4WNToF (A2FFIC L RSLAG ~ToRYEA~MEWr W/~A.g5~5F'"" ~xtav'aTicN d FILL /Com Fo11Ms 7o ToAaG7. 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to ye an ac orate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): orgy Lor B~4,'&,l 227.E ~T F¢e~rTa4d, ou 1~MLw ~T.. No'TeILLS 040 14^Y P XL.., COVEL. ?A.¢T of IVIT~:_ wd"4 SILL of 6rA ALL 5oo 16 8. Estimateq Date for Completion of Proposal: JULY 19Ao 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Requirea for the Prcpesal (federal, stare ina local - including rezones): AELoN~- ~un1T~( :.F SPACE FOR EXPLANATION '.S NADEQUATE, °LEA.SE A7ACH -400.T72NAL ?AGES. 10a. Co you, cr the owner in the evert you do not own the subject land, nave am, plans for ,w~i ^S r "':r*hPr 1_ 1 z r 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: Wo 12. Attach any other application form that has been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form:_ 1hUiL-v►r4t4 _fte-1if ! E2 f Vn c nnfr _ II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Jar 2. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . (b) 01sruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? . . . . . (c) Change in T;R MINhyAMestlluTd r/ r ~i erN'~i~ ? o qift EGT (dl The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (a) Any Increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site?. (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . . .C Explanation: 2. A_ Will the proposal result In: Yep, Maybe No (a) Air o~nnissions or MR SMAL1• deterioration f ie t air quality? . . . .X 7 Al ~ fp Twrx v TO ~t~►► (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ (c) Alteration of air movement. moisture or temperature. or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: ja1110%1&_..._ 3. Water. Will the proposal result in: g{ Maybe No (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface star runoff "mr valutJ otq eN St at J i i1U i4JdJY rd 6A1 D ib I & (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?. . . . . . . . . . (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?. . . . . . . _ (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or witharawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (h) Oeterioration in ground water quality, either through sirect injection, or through the seepage of leachate, pnospates, detergents waterborne virus or bacteria, or other suostances into the around waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for puolic water suoplies. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IP#r AIWLIuT NICE owsy Fee apE Riot no N a F A-*J 04:pa ammeLrEx pf TKrS *JAf&JQE r Explanation: EfolyiOsica Pp[~,E 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe lio (a) Change in the diversity of species, or nuber of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora; and aq"THE Rull i it<* 1tVMOM764 OF'Lt~Dsr.AP~.' rlaYR.RtA . (b) Reduction of the nubers of any unique. rare or endangered species of flora?. (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a 9rmal b No b -to pla ES nWX frT Ta i 1 NTURS l-V sLAiJA-M PLAN, ~c (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~C Explanation: ,64%,a- 5. a na. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish. benthic organisms, insects or microfaune)? . . . . . . . . . X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare. or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exa ; a,niti,on: 6. Nom. Yes Maybe Nr: (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? . . . miW a AMOUr41 Dye To 1WMZKASE of Aurt> 'T¢AFFtc ' Explanation: 1. Light and Glare Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare?. er&Y MAN, AMd&JMT Foe P~g~~c SattETY - Explanation: 8. Land Use. Yes Maybe Nl-. (a) will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Zc Explanation: 9. Natural Resources. Nill the proposal result in: res "avoe 10 ;a) Increase in :he rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ Explanation: M 10. -Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe No release o7-hazardous substances (includinq, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 11• Po ul ti . In Maybe No Will'roposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of thewuTV pINo0.ILAi1L 1W of 4rz 13PA6-. Pto pm ' A ' * . . . X,. Ex lea nation: All 0-OLTE To lb(c e QU*W? V5 Joe 10P ES i d7 6Il V69Y *M).s.t- AtIAOU iT O CHA , 19. !Will ng • Liss Maybe No the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: ~Jo _.W, OT1AR14 L1L GKAtlSig: TO I4ajAbifjr4 lt~t' 13. Trgns_rtation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: LU Maybe Lo (a) Generation of adIt,~n (b) Effects on existi ar in fac litl or d nd for new parking? . ~ 00 dIPIA 04 C1 N. 14W.16TY 004L.I? (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Alterations ~too~pres9ennttds patterns of circulation or movement of people J~.M .~'540a 1.214P► ari t'• . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2L Explanation: 14. Pu lic Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result Ygs Maybe No in a nee or new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Parks or other recreationl facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (s) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . Explanation: 15. Energy., Will tho proposal result in: Yes Mavbe No (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require the development of new sources of energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: y • 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, ha Maybe No or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural _qas?~. To ~1►.G~LI'TY . . M Camswni cats on system . (c) Water?. T6 Mc:WtV . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Sewer or septic tanks ? . . . . . . . . . . . . J. To VA40N, (e) Storm water drainage? "N'TAI' Ep' dtl VfiE . (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . JAplinallon: os, Ma-ybq o 17. Human H lth. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?. . . . . . . . . . . . 1 n ion: 18. A th tics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or YjL Mayh No view open to the public, or will the proposal result In the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? Fxplo align: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or In MaX,be No quantity of existing recreational opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 20. r h to ical H1 torical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a IS Mayes No significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building?._.... EX2160ation: M. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- full misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane my may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliance u o th chec ist. Oate: //'/G " 71 Proponent:. (Please Print or Type) ~ENr A 92023 Proponent: Q A_Y. F,_E Lm Address: Phone: 9 8 Person completing form:A&L_ Phone: 929 1 [o0 Oate: II-Ili- 1~ Oepartment or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: Rae- - 1W 19 xffi~- FRlrwa E - - - - 10 - ul Y c~ ~ l E or - mAn it ~ I M 9 6 4C Aa. - WN T GO M E R Y DR 7 { _ 96 C. O Fp,t r i o ~ 0 ►rOAA . n ijE[2 4 r MISSION X "I A L In AXE r ~I Q a SoNTO I r = 0 iidT I►+ 'IN E L L ~ t - I E 232 SK" I. 79- I 3 ` -.149 - Y 1 O E S M E T• I.,+ T W a,Mfr DESMET AVE _ _ A. AT- ALO ~ATAI vtl ►4 W o _ a CT. 41 E hO r QU O a II - -A ~fL7-1 1 6 7=- L ;Pin~S IRA v~ ALK I h~tltiool•~ K Av I n` • - - 60 1. N n - I V E- It W /Vf AV& J 1- Z G R J' A►- L Y wAY X VA LL E Y ■ z L.E ~ r AIN7) Se • 70/ of = Rl IuF/ a~ ` plVEft51DE ~ 3 x 'o v L. ►n JArL.19951° EL ~9y - r PR GUE ~ Vlr. A- M. 4o 2 312+ • PCST FF; CE s,,.. t cc , 41 1- ROAD I A )rid f Q z I ` 7. FOURTH AV Y X10=1000 0 Z I x l 0 U a.5 _ 1►. Z 4 1 61► i tA oe I AV6 Si,c T f1 .3 'iIX ~E a ♦VE,i~ - ITh V ~W t E } Y STAFF REPORT DATE JANUARY 10, 1980 TO HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER ZE-232-79 I GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT Gary Fields STATUS OF APPLICANT Purchasing Property PROPERTY OWNER Hugh Smith REQUESTED ZONING Residential Office EXISTING ZONING Agricultural Suburban PROPOSED USE Office complex PROJECT LOCATION Generally located on the south side of Main Avenue approximately 1,950 feet east of Pines Road II SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE Approximately 1 92 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site is undeveloped and currently bein filled in with dirt and concrete g NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER Neighborhood is currently a mixture of single family dwellings and more intensive multi-family and office uses LAND USE Site Undeveloped North Single family residence East Single family residence and undeveloped West Apartment complex South Commercial ZONING North Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 East Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 Multi-family Suburban, established, 1976 Commercial, established, 1974 West Residential Office, established, 1978 South Commercial, established, 1959 1 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIO^I "UMBER ZE-232-79 II SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Residential neighborhood NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS Vacant NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED Two Total Square Feet Approximately 32,356 sq ft Percent of Coverage 20 7% MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES 2 stories PARKING REQUIRED 81 PROVIDED 86 III BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Commercial uses currently exist to the south along Sprague Avenue, with less intensive office and multi-family uses to the north providing a buffer to residences in the area IV AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 No comments received b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1 Applicant shall dedicate 5 feet on Main Avenue for right-of-way and slope easements as necessary 2 Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Main Avenue 3 Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project 4 The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving c) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses 2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIO IIIMBER ZE-232-79 IV AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 Depending upon total sewage flow design, this project may require approval of the sewage system by RE-DSHS and require effluent disposal in non-paved areas e) SEPA 1 That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43 21C 080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made f) ZONING 1 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accord- ance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained 2 Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits 3 The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee 4 Landscape maintenance provisions and a performance bond shall be submitted to the Zoning Administrator to accompany the land- scape plan as identified on the site plan, prior to issuance of building permits for this site 3 CARLISLE ti p cR M r+n_- I 1 0 uj co y • , OC ~ r~nrJ'•I-iCi.~ X91` oA M A • TL~A~1~O_ , _t t M~I jam=- fc 1965 ~ SHANNO _ &v E. _ - i......~ M('NTGOMERY DR. • 90 Z o~ O V O , ~,t v1 ) #I Lr 0 w_oAA 2 of C ; r tt+oran iEL2CV4 I MISSION A, y I AXW E ' Q o M dV EL.L SINTO E 232 79 too ( r z < IN-r S MI►R w `I It A %I F- I. ID 1 0ESMET r C, _ • . ~G W or,-•c r DES M ET AV E • k x 2 - D ,ATAL O CsaTsaL DU r 0. I c.a+,. c r. LDO W y~ DI a k T U La tn. f 1 6 :;,•J E L Z W i :Pined s%ir►io.A r AL_K I -E .Hi9h~c1~x , IPL K Av .,L,~, 41 n W D~ivE Avt ' i a Z c ALLEY wa,Y a- Z VA LL- Er \A p I !Y Mop rV 1 ~E ~ AIN J E •.~lts.ot ~ p _ d R~ SIDE ~n a I 3 r ry Z ' RIVEft510E L. ,0£1.1993 EL. 99 PRAGUE ~AV X~l dl; Y. 4u Z 3 12f • PCST FFI CE ► i _vV T dl cROAD - 0 - 1 r O SRO~~ Q FOURTH AV cl Y 00 2 m x O O Q3 o , Z z GTH a S► A T H 3 51X vE ♦vE.Z~ - ~W vc t ins u► _J U7Th A v F S Gam. ZOE_ AGhNCV M1:::A#0NSt F'UKM DATE : TU. All? 7-c 1511q/i,4~' -s- 1/7 WRO" ; nl a r- lttl.:: is 1-ricf J, 17 1- V J, d; e) 0 Ab. eicy; o a t4 V If Ae A_q ",e a d2 ANl.1 Ivse►t 1'tu)v`t: :27e -12e 7Vc1q C_ pion 1 ItAvt KLv I Lwk.l) 'flit AND Irt1V.Ck. I.tdt~ 1'cup.-Miadl-Ooc..~t 51~alE. oc Nop iii~glE.. Utd1S - t'tly WA MIA QUALITY A. _ __Ua:v1a:W Fur Al,l,rovall Ituyulred ---I. SCI,t la: tatik W1170500 C.P.D. or SO or mur• rvrvicuv HuCll.Anlc:al dyvtu• or laKoon W/35011) G.P.Q. or lU oc wuru rL:gvl&,.::.. Cuwenurc In 1 or induct r 1*1 lac it lty. _ 4. NPULS Puruwl t ruyul ra d StdtC Nurwl[ cuyutrud 1. S. 1'I ul,ist-.:[ 1014 11104JU :artsed C•_ ('•W• 1. 1't-eNJt.at talk R e11ueayted U. _---_-k:ety 1 r.,ee,wuelt:a t t:lu=~:kl !.a[ itrqueelltud . ~W.ata:e' Quul Ily SLAIW.al-day Mudificaat400 Requirad AI,I,1 la:.a:it 1'u be Matti lud Na I.iluuNa:,ll E.1.--- - -l:ut'A1Ia:J 1:4016,,,u11tit Att.aa:lbwal A 1 K gUA1.1'1'Y (lit Cumil lure ut •I.,r l ud la:t 1011) A. -Ni,r 1.-L: o,1 t:.,eeutreee:t 1i►ee Kasyulrud U . _ _ _ . -U~~► 1 ~~b 1'u ~ ~u 1 t Ka:y~a 1 t ~J ~t,l .l. S0UK(.L•. (1:1'A I:..:, 1 Ka:.al lull) A. _l'ruluct Wltlelel Ayullasr (ItaaaAW11p, Zu910) U. -tl'A Wev la:v Al,l,rdArm Na rwaisairy C. W 1 t 11111 S t r nuW 1 1 UW Z01114 OFFICE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Dote loemmber 21 Inter-office Communication To Zoning Adminiotrstor From County Engineer Subject ZE 232-79 #2 - 5' on Main Ave. #15 - on Main Ave. #19 #20 Form 327-c R FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: 2 61- 7 y Application No: Z r - 2 5 Z - 7 Name of Applicant: S Street Address of Applicant: R cl 0, 2- --5' City: IV 7 State: \/\,//fL,/, Telephone No. C c r Existing Zoning Classification: a R I LIA-T 41L/4-IL Date Existing Zone Classification Established: Existing Use of Property: 0 L E Proposed Zone Classification: F- 7 &&t*F-AL C - 1- l C 1 Proposed Use of Property: - - ~T is I Legal Description of Property: ye ! /~a I W I, U 0 -7 N E ~o ov' Po~B ' D J# E ALL Ste. J' 3a7' t-A /0-P ZA L /~4- - Section: ~S Township ~2, 5- Range: y~ Source of Legal: U` Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) f •S•'~~3' 5r,3 Property Size: 3 9~v g. Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: Street Address of the Property: ,4M . Who Holds Title to the Property: 01 If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it?. Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. -1- Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE iOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site an the area, which you feel make V this proposal warranted? 2. What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? ~a.r7r~ 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) 14a" -O&M~M~ I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. (S' ned) A66-417- (Date) -2- a i 162 =A. r - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 9 File # spa.&.c cauarv COU.r rausil Set-Twp-Rng Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 13.21C, RCd, requires all state and local governments agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely". as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be award of and concer themselves with the degree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be heloful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space Provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these auestions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, just answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: 4A RY Fie L Q S Phone Number n w 88 99 2. Address of Proponent: ~ Mica 90 2 3 3. Date Checklist Submitted: 4A 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: SpaKAws- cow"r,C FLAtogim , 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: 5. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate and rsta of its cope and nature): +~;O Q STOP4Y w/~S,5c~osF EV 0 MtN~ AMouNTe,F (2)oMcF. Uf(,.5. - 1 SToitYE%6P%s 1ENT /IR.sa SF' CWCAVaTlop Id FILL /coNFos%ms 7a To Pay, 7. Location of Proposal (describe the phvsical setting of the Proposal, as well 3s the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any other information needed to a an accurate understanding of the environmental settina of the proposal): oPEN Lef 91q(, 'SF /227•L Pr F9.6An c,E oN *wW 4*T.. No -TeIL-5 ~o *,1ATU apL_ CoVEL. 0•¢T olr SITr~ we i4 PILL of STW SkL SOIL Estimated Date for Completion of prroosa:: JULY 19Ao 9. List of 311 Permits, Licenses or Government Acorova s Recuirea for t!e prcocsal 'feceral, St3=e !nc local - including rezones': AE' ot4r.- -cow-N ::F SPACE FOR EXPL NA'I :uPl :S :NAM'UATE, aLEPSE ~ AC:- :0a. So you, cr `.he owner in the evert you do not own the suojec. land, nave any plans for future :adiz.:rs, exoansion, or furtner activity relates to or _onnec'ed Kith tnis orooosal? yes, exo1ain: NO i 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: No 11. Do you know of any plans by others including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal or land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: A1o 12. Attach any other application form that hds been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: Sall.V tW!Affe-M11- 5EPnC. VL- 12 MIT' II. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required) Yes Maybe No 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . . . (b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? . . . . . (c) Change in ,~oEpogr ~w yAotrrid~ro ,d ~~i f e ~W s o> si rk ~ F1ho J EGT (dl The destruction, 1 covering or modification of any unique geologic or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either on or off the site?. (IF SPACE FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADDITIONAL PAGES.) (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~C Explanation: 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Air ~egmmissions or deterioratiion QQf ie-r~t air quality? . . X Tff/t 940W6 EifiW CJ4t A I wAs5sp Ir-OxIG /a rob (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: &SbV& 3. 'dater. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe 11o (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~C (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and amount of surface water runoff? ~C cur Vesg1w,tefE eA1 gIrO, d j rurp#i i9if to 4A0 sifi_ (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~C (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?. . . . . . . . . . (e) Discharge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f; Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?. . . . . . . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either througn direr= aaditions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aoui fer by cuts or excavations? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (h) Oeterioration in ground water quality, either through direct injection, or through the seepage of leachate, pnospates, detergents waterborne virus or 'oacteria, or other suostances X into the around waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . M Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available °or puo 1 i c water supplies' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Or AlwamT NACE sSAIAN Foe o f i no N or- pit Dicf t GE CeMV LF= k of TN Vc W aTcJ ¢E Explanation: Pt.EV10&JS Pet~.S>E 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or nuber of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aq"TIAERil uti6`?E;E' ►NTSIZVOT?d l OF'LWVc-i?'AFre' tAMj7JZiALA.6 (b) Reduction of the nubers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier No SFKt% ES nU 16T Tb i I NI RS T existing WIVS sp&~iF'~7 PLAT J~ ~C (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~C Explanation: A&&Va S. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? . . . . . . . . . . ~C (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . ~C (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . .C Explanation: 6. Noise. Yes Mavbe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? wW, AMoUNT Avt To ►NCfLiEASE of Ad16 - ¢&FFtc Explanation: - 1. Light and Glare Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare?. eMLY tAw, AMerJkJT GO¢ Pl GL►G SA~ET~ Explanation: S. Land Use. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 9. Natural =esour_es. iii l l the proposal result in: Yes "avbe 'lo ,a) Increase in _he rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . . ib) Deoletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X _xolanation: 10. Risk of Uoset. Does the proposal involve a risk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe No release or hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, _ pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: 11. Population. Yes Maybe No Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area?. . P~p`.~.14 . . . . . _ wirht INGCp,►f^ocS1L ►N oFv:1 .r 5P Exolanation: ZkEL.oca'r'IlE To QaE CLOSER To J06 DISMI13d7)o1j VF-¢y ramA -t- AMOt. MT eF CNA► zr-. 12. Housina. Yes Maybe No Will 'tfie proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Exolanation: No 'N18T1CPtA9LfL 0,KAW(4rc. TO HoWitur4 MMAKEr 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Generation ad itl i15`I U4fllgri 'opv eUoiC:aJIAjr pavi )4amr- (b) Effects on existing ar~cingg,~faciilitiV or d nd for new parking? oN SIM (tKI1VC1 V-09 MILtTY OWV1 (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people )a_nd~ S~o~ILI.? l4 10i/Nr . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists, or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2L Exolanation: [J o%IF- 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result Yes Maavvb_e No in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Parks or other recreationl facilities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X- (e) Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? . . . . . . . . . . -AX.- (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . Exolanation: 15. Enercy. ''Ai l l r.hP orooosal result in: Yes Mavoe No (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Demand jpon existing sources of energy, or recuire the develcemen*_ of ^ew sources cf 3ner^y? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanaticn: 1 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, Yes Maybe No or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural _VOC To i0AdA13TY . ' (b) Caamunication system . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SE~Z v-s ~ To ;act 1. i'iT( . (c) Water?. Tb FA6iLti-q . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~t (d) Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . To IN, (e) Storm water drainage? iNTAiN*E17. W tifiE 1 (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . S G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o~ S i fL ~pT~ Explanation: fbf'~oyF Yes Maybe No 11. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potential health hazard (excluding mental health)?. . . . . . . . . . . . ~C Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or Yes Maybe No view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or Yes Maybe No quantity of existing recreational opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a Yes Maybe No significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building?. Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- full misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane my may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue in reliant u o th chec ist. Date: 74 Proponent: (Please Print or Type) Proponent: Q 0,5 ! F 1 E L V f:p Address: M/CA 996 2 3 Phone: 124- 88° 9 Person completing form: AFL Phone: q2$ 1 [oD Date: 11-Ito- 1q Oeoartment or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: staff Nember(s1 Reviewing Checklist: File # 2L ::23 Sec. T'sh'p~ R'ge i1 X Classification As f v Proponent S P O K A N E C O U N T Y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subse- quently been reviewed by the The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Actions(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval ; Final Plat Approval Change of Condition ; Other B. Description of Proposal: C. Location of Proposal: Il. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) Air (9) Natural (16) Utilities Resources (3) Water (10) Risk of Upset (17) Human Health (4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Recreation (6) Noise (13) Trans/Circ (20) Arch/Hist (7) Light/Glare (14) Public (21) Other Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: Revised 6/1/79 C. Discussion of impacts identified above: III. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of non- significance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recom- mends/issues a final declaration of non sign ificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: Y Revised 6/1/79 .r mow/` ZONING WORKSHEET Form C Application X? 3 c~ This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to present a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed below.) PART I - to be completed by Spokane County Engineer A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: ye s 0. 2) Access to be limited to: 3) Access permit is required. 4) a. medication for right-of-way is required. feet on Road Avenue.) b. ----Radius ( foot) is required. (On and - Road, Street, Avenue.) C. Slope easement is required S) -Drainage Plan is required. on-site off-site. 6) Paving Permit is required. (_2-t-feet on Road.) 7) ~ `-Curb is required, (along , venue.) 8) idewalk is required. (along QCs-•-L Avenue . ) 9) pplicant must be willing to participate in future LID/RID. 10) egal description is acceptable as reviewed Parcel No. 1--) ~2 c-7 Comments: Sig ~4d Date __A4 ZONING WORKS----T--continued-2 FART=II -to be completed by Spokane County Utilities Department A preliminary consultation eeting has been held with the Spo ne County Utilities Department and the proposed developm t plans have been reviewed , i" 1) The proposed developm nt is/is not located a public sewer service area operated and maintaine by Spokane. Cou 2) A storm drainage plan is/ not re red for the proposal. Comments S igned f - Date PART. III- to be completed by Spokane County Water Purveyor A, Water Supply "EM EMTRX WATER C X) 1) The proposed development is located with thee?, district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agree ment/arra has/has not been made to serve this proposal. 3) We are/ to supply this development with adequate potable wa ter. 4) We are/are not able to supply this development with adequate water for fire flow, - D&' V 1~`Z0 S) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other: G 6) Water system_,~eis not under State Utilities jurisdiction. 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: inches. 8) Distance to main: a,() r feet. B. to be completed by Applicant 1) Individual water supply will be developed with/without fire protection capabilities. Comments: Signed Da to C. If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Department of Social and Health Services must review th proposal prior to application. 1) I/Ws have reviewed the proposal It app to meet State requirements for public water. r Sictned - D.S.H.S. • ZONING "',KSHEET continued-3 PART IV - to be completed by Spokane County Fire Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District rte" 2) :~cces s and circulation for emergency vehicles is requireu . 3) Fire flow is/ s no -adequate for proposed development t~"Oc/is not required. 4) ES Main (s) need to be installed. 5) lE5 F?vdr~nt(s) need to he ins t~ll~. 6) 7) Nearest fire hydrant is feet. 8) Driving distance to nearest fire station is , &11n_C-k Comments : SNIxJ icJ dVM4 ~v b JOkA.45 /o E - 111r617 Sign Date PART V - to be completed by Spokane County Health District A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and dispo al appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: , 2) Air quality i (sno concern with this proposal. 3) Ground water quality/is not a concern with this proposal. 4) Noise i s n a concern with this proposal. S) Lighter/is not a concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: ez-61 7( Signed Date- AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY F SPOKANE ) /v C;7.S Being first d ly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. S S That on 1+r' j~c~-1 0l" C'C. • 1979, ~ he personall por e8 a true and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane County, to-wit: S F- ZS-, cs1cA,~,r (0 tir ~tJ,v~ • Ck E f T 4 S1 Gl= 7 r Ap lican o g nt Subscribed ('N and sworn to me c/G ae, 191, X C NOT Y BL IN AN PO C UN Y, WASHINGTON Residing a Spokane, ashing n z~- q AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) } SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE } KATHY JUSTICE Being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington, and over the age of eighteen years. That on the 26th day of DerembPr 1979, I personally deposited in the United States mail at lst and Wall with sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the 14th day Of December 19~ 7Q , who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and did notice adjacent property owners to the site by certified mail. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. DATED this 26th day of December 1979 . J SUBSCRIB D and SWORN t© me thi his Uay Of 19 r/ h e-V " NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPO E OUNTY $ WASIJINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington, FY APPLICATION NUMBER AGENDA, JANUARY 10, 1980 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 1:30 P.M. C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS 6. ZE-232-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL OFFICE (South side of Main Avenue, approximately 990 feet east of Pines Road. Section 15-25-44) Proposed Use: Offices Applicant: FIELDS (1.9 Acres) 7. ZE-242-79 AGRICULTURAL TO LOCAL BUSINESS (East side of Sullivan Road, approximately 642 feet south of Broadway Avenue. Section 13-25-44) Proposed Use: Restaurant and Limited Retail Applicant: SULLIVAN GROUP (2.3 Acres) 8. ZE-257-79 AGRICULTURAL TO COMMERCIAL (East side of Progress Road, approximately 350 feet north of Sprague Avenue. Section 14-25-44) Proposed Use: Retail Uses Applicant: HILLSTEAD and KETO INVESTMENTS (1.67 Acres) 5:00 P.M. - - - - - ADJOURNMENT A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-20-330(2) provides that: 11 . In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficient to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E.I.S. shall be prepared". 2- ~ " n CARLISLE v~ N J~ w ER M K4--- ~I 10 ti, H Q CO < ' (t o~ M A14 -e~ Z A N N O V E. 19 N GOMERY On - J ~ 9G b&4 -Ap. -a.- C. , t C N 14 - 0 ~ ~ NoAA , ~ I 2S z G 0 n; I0 PA _ t Ll ' r MISSION I 18 x v►/ E Y ; ►4 '6ELL I $~NTO ( Ti z < tNT 1 S MnR w Y 232~79 3 < J a ac Z ~ r DE S M ET ASV E O ATAL O CATL DV ~vc~ri r a.~ 3 U- 0. a L-cw c T. G l r) C) 51 C3 Y 0 4t F) A L K I ;N iqh Scl~eol; d r. L K A v • - - wa w• ~ N.l Av/ z . G a ~ - a_ 0 VA L_ - E Y AL- L Y WAY 31 --M& a • Z ' ML z MA1/r C O 11E F AIN E W A ors•ar j~ R I V E ft S 109 ' 3 x ry 3 V1 I -DEL. /993 60. E L . .o PR GUE C. 000 4u 2 3 12f • POST FFI CE I . OAVF. Y 41L ROAD~ - O R D ,c J 11 f z t Tf~ OUR T H AV El. ~ Z Y o c _ 1,•_ 1000 O x O -t V• = R 6TH uc SIAT H ; ill( vE AV~i~ Ul[ ~ ~ ENE J /'~i ~~'r, afl4 F~iST AVEi 90"Nk WA 9914 LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY 456-0550 =SENT C,6 RTlFIE0 LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) OPPORTUNITY 0 W.C. Tandy 15543-2602 N 300ft of W2 Exc E 260ft E. 127U2 a ey ay B T Etta N. Tandy Spokane, WA 99216 2 0 Ewing Sampson 15543-2603 pt of B122 $eg at NE cor of E. 12720 Valley Way 2 S O t th T Ewing Sampson E 195ft th N to POB 0 Rich R. Hull 15543-2604 260ft of N300ft of W12 T Spokane Mtq. 0008087 0 0 Asher & McMillan 15543-2605 190ft of N 186ft of S206ft of W z T Farmers & Merc Bk #Asher -7 IS' 0 J.E. Dean 15543-2606 B122 W5ft of N186ft of S206ft of E 195ft of W~2- & W~ Exc 11 T Comm Mtg. #036873 300ft & Exc c W65ft of N186ft of S206ft. 0 T 0 Lawrence Keough 15543-2607 Pt of B122 E 195ft of WZ Exc E. 12723 Main Ave-- P1 t & Exc S20 t & Exc W T Lawrence Keough 95ft of N186ft of S 206ft; Pt n f X22 2 1 „Z W2 ~ f E i 0 Zane R. Williams - Exc S20ft. T Bancshares Mta. 0 K.D. Peters - of c/o Randall Peters W229ft & S of N225ft & N of T Kenneth D. Peters 8 Otis Orchards, WA 99027 0 T 0 J.E. Richardson 15543-2704 W 1321t of N280ft-- of OOft E. 12502 Valleyway B123 T Jesse Richardson Spokane, WA 99216 0 Chas H. Abbey 15543-2709 ' Pt of B123 Sl t of ~E Exc S20ft & E4ft of S T Bancshares Mtg.--,- JT #1710453_ 1214.5ft o W-, Exc s 20f-t. (Ccntinued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 Loren R. Heyn 15543-2710 OPPORTUNITY Pt of B123 W7/10 Loren R. Heyn'_ Valleyford, WA of E~ Exc W 96ft & Exc E 65ft T 99036 of N230ft & Exc S350ft ll 0 W.J. Stephen 15543-2713 t of B123 E 65ft of N210ft E. 72615-Main Ave. of S230ft of W7/10 of Eh T William J. Stephen Spokane, WA 99216 eve. j O Valley Sec Inc. #321393 Pt of B123 S350ft of W7/10 of 2 Exc t & Exc E 5ft of T Col Mtg w 15543-2714 S230ft & Exc S 20ft. 0 J.E. Richardson 15543-2718 W132ft of B123 Exc S300ft & T J.E. Richardson E. 12502 Valley Way Dr. Sipokane. WA-99216 ►y 0 D. Holub Etal 15543-2712 9ft E of NW cor Tr 123 th S par wit T Pac Nat Bk of Wash #899 343 6225 W ln Tr 123-to T)t ft N o S In for ture POB th S par with W In to pt n S In sd Tr th E alg S In Tr 0 123 to t 4ft W of S cor of W of Tr 123 t N par with E In sd W k-214.5' th W to true POB Exc N 65ft & Exc W 20ft & xc S 20ft T 0 Kathleen Peters 15543-2721 pt of B123 N65ft of Fol Desc c/o Randall Peters Tr: Beg at pt on N In of Tr T Kenneth D. Peters--Est. E. 18914 Marlin Dr. 123 229ft E1 from NW cor sd r t par with W s Tr to Pt N S In for true POB th S par 0 with W In to pt on S In tr 123 th E alg S 1 to t Oft W of SE cor of Wl~ o r 113 tN N par with in o S W t t W to true POB Exc S20ft. T ~0 J.W. McAlpine 15543-2723 pt of B123 E97ft of W 229ft E. 12b13 main ve. xc t & xc Also T J.W. McAlpin Spokane, WA 99216 W20ft of Fol descTr: Beg at p on in o r 2 a pt 229FE y rom NV' cor par with In sd Tr 0 to pt 214.5ft N of S In of sd Tr for true P B th S par with W In to Pt in in to pt 4rt W or SE cor o o r par T with E In of sd W-2 2 4.5ft th W to POB Exc 65ft & Exc S20ft. ,kj 0 Olive Rozeboom A15543-2724 El/5 of E~2- Exc S20ft B123 Tax only E. 12622 Valley Way T Olive H. Rozeboom S-ookane, 0 J. Richardson 15543-2813 B124 8ft & Exc S20ft T Pac lst Fed S&L -122602 8 (Ccntinued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) 0 Wolff & Bennett 15543-3916 S340' of N360' of W160' of ox po ane, r B 59 T Alvin J. Wolf Inc. 99214 0 W.C. Ketterman 15543-3917 ptn of Blk 159; W 160' less ~S c/o vin o n & xc N -W 601 T Bar B. Ranch Motel Box 14025 0 • T 0 Flegel Etal 15543-3921 Blk 159 Exc E 250' & Exc W 160' & Exc N175' & Exc S50' T Bar B. Ranch Motel4d S okane / WA /v ~j& 0 Flegel Etal 15543-3922 v.e N175' of Blk 159 Exc W 160' & Exc E250' & Exc N20' T Bar B Ranch Motel Spokane, WA 0 R.F. Pearson Etal 15543-3802 Pt of B158 W127.17ft Less R/W Exc N 285ft T Pac 1st Fed S & L #13-122550 0 ,N 0 M.N. Damascus 15543-3803 pt of B158 Beg 50ft N of SW -7. l19i9 i Ave. cor o E!2- t E t th N T Michael N. Damascus Spokane, WA 99206 250.7ft th W 158ft th S 250.7 to POB . 0 T i3cny 0 A.F. Gribnau 15543-3804 pt of B158 S 85ft of N285ft T Pac lst Fed S&L #13-120938 3 0 A.F. Gribnau 15543-3805 pt of B158 S70ft of N200ft E. 10316 Sharp Ave. of W127.17ft T Ralph C. Monetz Sr. Spokane,. WA 99206 1 0 Par Acceptance _ 15543-3806 Pt of B158 N130ft of W127.17 1 Box 14856 ft Exc N20ft. T Par Acceptance Spokane, WA 99214 ti 0 Beulah B. Coman _ 15543-3809 B 158 E100ft of S135ft of S. 1329 Ferris Ct. N155ft T Beulah B. Coma -Spokane, WA 99202 l (Ccntinued on next page) LIST OF OWNERS AND PERSONS PAYING TAXES ON PROPERTY LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T) t;O Main Ave. Partnershi 15543-3815 OPPORTUNITY E 30' of 5250' Equitable Invest. ~ S. 717 Pines Rd. Spokano. 992 T 06 of W12- of Tr 158 Exc S50' r _ s 0 L.B. Wilcox Etal 15543-3818 & 2 T Linc Mut Sav Bk #6 1 4038 7 Exc N20ft & Exc W 127.17' of W12- of Tr 158 lyg N of S250ft 0 ' T w Z4 0 Dean Grafos 15543-3819 Ptn of EZ of Blk 158 Beg at E. 1U11b 29t-h- SE cor o - sd Blk th N50ft to T Dean Grafos Spokane, WA 99206 true POB th W 169.5ft M/L th t t t W158' 0 th N23.2ft th E 327ft M/L to in o t S 273ft M/ T L to POB. Hugh T. Smith 15543-3820 Ptn of E~ of Blk 158 beg at 0 E. 9016 Boone Ave. cor o s Oft th T Hugh T. Smith W 100ft to true POB th W227' M-IL to NE cor o 2- o sd Blk 0 th S 298ft M/L th E 327ft M/L to E In of Blk 158 th N T f ATE cor th W 100ft th N 135ft to 0 PQB. T L~ 0 H.D. Douglas 15543-3821 Ptn of Blk 58 DAF: Beg at a E. 815 Rosewood Ave. pt 115.16' W of N S center In T Harlan D. Douglass Spokane, WA 99208 & 50' N of S In th W 85.17' th N 270' th E 85.09' th S 0 270' to POB. T Harlan D. Douglass 15543-3822 Ptn of Blk 158; Beg at a pt 0 _ Ln of T H.D. Douglas Spokane, WA sd Blk 50' N of S In th E 1 th. N 0;01 5.08 th S 270' to POB. 0 T (Ccntinued on next page) L I..i t Llr lJrii.tZJ t1i~iJ i" `i.Lt..,11J 111111+13 111, '.ill I ..LJY I..ttl l LAST GRANTEE IN CHAIN ADDITION OF TITLE (0) AND ADDRESS LOTS BLK PERSONS PAYING TAXES (T)' ,so J.A. Scroggins 15543-3107 OPP BREWSTERS B.157 E62.73' L5; Exc E loft L6 Bl T Pac 1st Fed S&L 413-122711 0 H Douglass 15543-3511 Lts T Harlan D. Douglass Spokane, WA 4►7,8,9,10,11 & 12 Blkso Vaco ft a alley in Blk 3 & ptn of vac 0 alley i Blk ad-'to Lt 4 & S2ft of Lt 3 also vac T Cherry St. L Betwn Blk 2 &3 & N50ft of S100ft of Blk 157 0 all DAF; Be at SW cor ofL4 t N50.0 ft th E155.63ft th T N141.91ft th E448.90ft th S t th W . 9 f t th N 0 145.93 th W to POB T 0 22542-0216 W- of W~2- B162 T Virginia Anderson E. 12710 Sprague Ave. Spokanp, WA 99216 0 E 120ft of W498ft B163 ';L = c/o White Elephant T Conley Enterprise N. 1730 Uivision St- Spokane, WA 99207 0 T 0 M.L. Armstron 22542-0309 N190ft of fol of Tr E. 12624 Sprague 163: Beg at NE cor th S alg T Mel & Dick Armstron Spokane, WA 99216 E In 639.31ft M /L to SE cor s Tr th W136.43ft th N639.1ft 0 M/L th E 135.42ft to NE cor Exc St. T 0 H.D. Douglas 22542-0310 E 258ft of W 378ft B163 T Harlan D. Douglas Spokane, WA --e' 7149 2 t /_1 14, . T- (Ccnti ued on next page) T- Date Time 1 E YOU UT l - A0 ,4 of Phone Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message ED Operator EFFICIENCY@ LINE NO. 2725 AN AMPAO PRODUCT 60 SHEETS ~i , 5 8: m ~ F~ i a~; . g ~ : ~ s~. - a;~ . i ~ x ~ c~ s z ~ > ; ~ , . . .,w k s.: f r . ¥ ~xA s: ~ % p 45.: w ..:..,...,,.~.,.„~,,,~..:~.....A~.~ ~ ~~n,„ fir' ~t; ~ § 6 s F .z° $ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E. ,y. ' € 4 ~ .III z ~ p~ ~ < e s ; e ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ; ~ ~ ; e ~ rr m ~ , ra,. 4 = ~ ~ << ~ S f p ' ~ ; s j a ~ z ~ yx? J. ~ ~ ¢ E . a Y : .y. Tk y.... - S k ~ ~ W. ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ n • a. ~ s gR~ x. ~ c' . ~ . .:..........:n,:,..,.. „,....mw n...,. :.........,...ter-, n IX R, j:. ~ k~ { . d ~ .f ~ ~ t ~ ~ a r T i3: i r . c ~ ~ a... . g; . r. a : ~ ~ 9 k; . ~ a: ~ E. ...3 ~ ~ x. ' ggg u.: , ~ - n ~ s` ~ 9 r ~ ~ y . ..q~ ~ . a a. ~4: ~ . A n.. ; ,a. Y a , - p . ~ ~ , ~ ;ra R; . .fix R n . ~....,...~«ro...~.... n ~ . ~ ~ ~ - ~ . , ra:.. x ~ . F y A .r 3s. i : . p wi 5 is , n. a I ~ 9 .i a:. ~ , ~ , , s F ~'y# .p" 'y: a~ gy , F ~ ' ~'9 ~ 6 .A......... ~ 4 ~ am y'~ ~ l ~ k .H ~ y k $ x .y. y a x, , v I dr 4. ' dr vii 5: ; 3Y ~ s a: ~ r .Z:. , , : - raz . , x b ~i x ~ ' ~ ~ :...9 ~ ~ ~ ~ n ~A k. n~ p.: n . E. . .a , Ax: ~ . . ~ ~R .f , a:F c•' , - 4 - m ~ a - e~: . S p ffY a: $ 5 5 y g. rr f j a . ' ~ : a. ~ a :u ~ f ~ ° p: z F, ~ r E: r. q-~ . ~ ~ .r ~ ~ > . u.. ~ A e ~ . 1 S: 3 d:. ~ ::r :..g ~ m.' ~ F'`' t 5..~ a. 3 ~ ~ q ' c.. w... ~ rY tjpPOV D t S qq.. d : .re. 6... .L 11 ..1 . .e t a. ;4 Q :;.mod . l Sx:~. s Vs LV Q OF -fit AC T 20h. i. p { i t ~ ~ I 1 °C' i ~ n ' 4 I { I I w k ~ i a ~a _ t ,u ~ ~,s 1 E 1 4 ~ 11 6, ~ i~ 7 t e ° 9 i a.:. F: ~ is ~ F: ...:5 e ~ .~:'8, ~ ' F.. k.... ~.x.:: R ~ 5 G:.: F... g y i ; ~ ' ,y. . 5 ~ x { F ~F P _ , ~ , . ~ M G ~ a ~ m ~ ' ' . _ tw: ~ E^.. ~ rc. u ~ R: c _ H:. } i. I Y ¢ y.... F ~ ~ ~ „ Y ~ rq¢`. ~ ~ .Z ~.a ~v . 4 I i i x. i x n. w k ~ z~ x is x Q F 5... F :A 4 ~ ~ ~ ' ~ 2 i . 5 Q. h `:.i r: ...a :n... r a. i 4 . , . , x- s. ; T { 1~ #~m ~~.........p i .--....w..w... . - _ {5 1 _ _ r~ ~ ~ 3 a i ~ . _ ~ t, ~ ._Y i.. b i 4 ~I t..., K e ~ a^ e+ _ _