Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
ZE-158-79
a ZONE/PUD RECLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST Jo ~1 r1 b~55~ir-• ~~Z-Z2ZZ File # f S _ `1 Contact: PART I ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP r), ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP. (Legal Description, 400 foot -boundary outside ownership) • ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION, (F or m A) • ZONING WORKSHEET o ?'W. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PLOT PLANS ( ~o SIGN PLAN Y~ • LANDSCAPE PLANS (5}- GRAPHICS PACKET k1l SLIDES (minimum size film 126) (date) L~? • APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER • r TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS (date 3/31 60 PA RT II COUNTY AGENCIES NOTIFIED NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPED, (date) ORIGINAL. GIVEN APPLICANT date STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL. CHECKLIST STAFF ANALYSIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING (A Sign - 4x4) (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) (date) ANALYSIS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PART III HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED MINUTES- MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) SEPA's Notice of Action BONDING (Landscape) ACCEPTED (date) RETURNED _ (da te) i~ S 17 o I< N G t t C_ c? L~ N `I' Y PLANNING DCPARTtv1ENT WALLIS D. HLIBBARD, DIRECTOR September 28, 1993 Mr. Robert D. Waldo Waldo and Schweda -Attorneys at Law North 2206 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206-4756 SUBJECT : Planning. Department File No. ZF-158-79 ~.i Dear Mr. Waldo: This correspondence responds to your letter dated August 39 1993 wherein you request a detennination of status regarding zone change file ZE-158-79. This project has been.before the Spokane County Dearing Examiner and the Board of County Commissioners several times in the past. I believe the enclosed staff report dated May, 8, 1980. under Request and the attached Findings and Order dated May 15, 19,810 address your concerns. If I can be of further assistance, please contact the at 456-2205. Sincerely, TS Z-VE P. HOROBIOWSKI Current Planning Administrator Enclosures FC U - W ALDO IXR-9/28/93 I Wf.ST'1026 BROADWAY AVCNuri • SPOKANii, %'VASIIINC,I'ON 99260-02=10 (509)1156-2205 ROBEF r D. VIA&0 WALDO AND SCHWEDA, P.S. TELEPHONE PETER S'. SCHWEDA Attorneys at Law (569) 9243666 NORTH 2206 PINES ROAD FAX SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206.4756 05091922-2196 f,.CEIvED August 3, 1993 AU G 0 51993 Steve Horobiowski SPOKANE CUUN ~PIAMING DEPARTMENT Spokane County Planning Dept. 721 N. Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 RE: Request for Administrative Change Per Zoning Code Chapter 14.504 ( ZE-1,5-8 -79 ) Dear Mr. Horobiowski: The undersigned is attorney for the Estate of Ernest P. Quinn, deceased, the present owner of a parcel of real property containing approximately 8 acres fronting on Pines Road directly south of the Trentwood Elementary School. The Estate is in the process of attempting to sell the property, and in our efforts, it has come to our attention that the property was rezoned by Mary F. Calistro in 1979, ZE-158-79, and that there is a very unusual term contained in the rezone order, "the property shall automatically revert to the pre-existing agricultural zone classification if the property is sold by Mary F. Cal istro to another party prior to full development pursuant to the application." I am hereby requesting pursuant to Spokane County Zoning Code Chapter 14.504 that your office make an administrative determination to either remove the restrictive language which I have quoted above since zone changes generally run with the land and do not revert due to a change -in ownership, or a determination be made that the language is no longer applicable since Mary F. Calistro has not sold the property and never will be capable of selling the property. 'At this- time I believe it is appropriate that I give you a little more history and background on the .property. The rezone occurred in 1979 to allow for condominium development. An application in 1984 to increase the density and allow apartments was denied. In 1987 Mary F. Calistro o-lost the property as a result of a deed of trust foreclosure, and the new owner was Ernest Quinn. who was the successful bidder at the trustee's sale, Trustee's Deed recorded as document number 871119,0166. Thus Mary F. Calistro was divested of tlzle without selling t-he property in 1987, the subsequent owner of the property has passed away, and now the estate is selling the property in liquidation of assets. 94 NO. d 7 -e57fW BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF SPOKANE COUNTY WASHINGTON V IN THE MATTER OF ZE-158A-79- ) MARY FRANCES CALISTRO, ) DECISION, FINDINGS OF FACT APPLICANT ) THE ABOVE CAPTIONED MATTER, having come on regu- larly for hearing before the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County at 1:30 p.m. on- Tuesday, Ocxtober 16, 1984 in the Assembly Room of the Board of County Commissioners, located on the first floor of the Spokane County Courthouse, and the applicant, Mary Frances Calistro being personally present and being represented by John P. Glessi•ng, Attorney at Law, and the Board of County Commissioners of Spokane County being advised by the applicant at the time of the hearing that they requested a modification of the proposal from that presented to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, so that the proposal now consisted of a request for a change of condition from File No. ZE-158A-79 to delete the condition requiring condominium development, only, and to review an unsubmitted site development plan for the change of conditions for the 8.83 acre parcel of property so that such parcel would be developed for an 80 unit apartment complex. NOW, THEREFORE, after considering the request of the applicant, and the provisions with the Spokane County Hearing Examiner ordinance concerning "substantially changed" projects from those submitted to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, the Board of County Commissioners does hereby determine that the proposed change of ZE-15.8A-79 from an 80 unit condominium development pro- ject to'a 172 unit apartment complex, as advertised, to an 80 unit apartment complex is a "substantially changed" pro- ject from that presented to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, and accordingly pursuant to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee ordinance, the Board does hereby transmit the revised proposal back to the Spokane County Planning Department with a direction that such new proposal be processed as a new application with the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. In conjunction with making such decision, the Board does hereby further direct the Spokane County Planning Director, to the extent that the new application will dupli- cate prior activities of the Spokane County Planning Department to reduce fees associated with such new applica- tion. ~ ) Gc.a•~..c~. - ,~cs~-rte ~ ~ o )lt~o . Q 7 ~ ~ /7,19 7Q. J ~t.aJ t9'~ •'G~.ti--c.L G~-Q. G~L~ YG~4.l~ ~ ~ ~ d Q, t v ; 1 y 7 ' . 1 r • . 1 i c R EC E 0 FIT Date A. -f Received From -7,,f-j A res's - -017 Dollars For ACCOUNT HOW PAID CASHy i;=. } , L1i • _ _ _ AMT OF ACCOUNT AMT- PAID CHECK ~J 571 BALANCE MONEY Q DUE ORDER By. 06 Reddy gel ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-158A-79 SPOKANE COUNTY r.- HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS_ AND ORDER ,r f~✓, cz- A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on August 2, 1984, and 'the,mernbers of the Committee present being Kenneth Kennedy, Chairman, and Richard L. Skalstad. Mrs. Myers excused herself from hearing this item due to appearance of fairness. 6:. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Mary Frances Calistro, is requesting approval of a change of conditions, File No. ZE-158A-79, Multiple Family Suburban Zone, for the- purpose of deleting the Co,nditio n requiring condominium development only; and, also to revi.e:v a site development plan for a two-phase 172-Un,i t Apart- ment Comp,l ex. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, school, cultivated, and undeveloped. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for Urban development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Multiple Family Suburban. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21'C (The State Environmental Policy-Act) have been complied with, and the Conunittee, concurs with the Decl-ara.tion of Non-Significance. 5. That the proper legal requirements -for advertisement of the Agenda item have been fu I fi'l led. 6. That the land in this area is unsuitable for the proposed use of 172-Units, or uses ,-.i thi n the proposed zone classification. 7. That the applicant has not demonstrated that conditions have substantially changed since the original zoning of this area and accordingly, the proposed re--one is not justified. 8. That the propose-d use is incompa.ti bl a with existing uses in the area. ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-1,58A-79 C. FI.NDINGS 'OF FACT (continued) 9. That the owners of adjacent lands and/or their representatives expressed disapproval of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee does not find the proposed use to be in harmony with the genial purpose and will be otherwise detrimental to the publ i c health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Ex,ami ner Committee: a) The immediate ,area is developed primarily with single family residences. b) The present, s'eweri ng facilities are, not adequate for the amount of density proposed. c) The increased density would not be appropriate in the near proximity to a school and adjacent single family residences. d) The planned development presented for this hearing is devoid of any concept used for the original zoning approval in 1979 and that no attempt has been made by the sponsor to proceed with the condominium project which indicates no compelling reason for the Zoning Hearing Examiner Commi.-ttee to allow the requested change of conditions. e) That other Multiple Family Suburban zone changes in the area•ha've different adjacent uses by which they were considered_ to be compatible with. f) That the time frame:for sewering this area is too uncertain to allow the density proposed. g) That the approval in 1979 for an 8OUnit Condominium project is realistic in light of the adjacent single family residential development to the west and south of this project. 2 s ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NO. ZE-158A-79 D. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Mary Frances Calistro, for a change.of conditions as described in the application should be DENIED. Motion by: Skalstad Seconded by: Kennedy Vote: Skalstad - Aye Kennedy - Aye DENY the CHANGE OF CONDI-TI'ONS application i'n- the Multiple Family Suburban Zone - 2 - 0 ) HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE • HEREBY ATTEST TO THE ABOVE FINDINGS, ORDER, AND VOTE • ~•l. 1. ~-t•e ~eE:C Cha,i rman / - lij ATTEST: For WALLIS D. HUBBARD Planning Director By STEVE P. HOROBIOWSKI Zoning Administrator Date: /Itf & ~f 3 t : . File ',Jo. ~F -1 58-79 SPOKANE COUNTY y HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter hav i ny come before the Hearing Examiner Coiwni ttee on 1kmxxd&,yx , May 8 1980, and the members of the Committee present being Ted McCoury, Acting Chairman, Kenneth Kennedy and Eldon Thomas B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Mary F. Calistro is requesting approval of a change of cond i t i onshwax , F i l e No. ZE-158-79 to amend Condition No. 1 to be reworded to read: x~C~x~dc~x~xc,x~xiC, Approval is granted for the so a purpose o con ominium development.", and delete as presented by the sponsor, Mr. Shogren". Also to delete Conditions 2 and 3 of the original approval. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is Elementary School, residential, cultivated and undeveloped. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is A ricultural until such time as development is completed in compliance with die con ions o the origins approval attached to the application. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Ayenda iten, have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this area is suitable/mm9ta bO for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. t the applicant has s not demonstrated tha 011ditions ha substant, changed since th iginal zoning of this ea and accor ly, the proposed rezone is riot justifie . ila e PruPOu j -'(1 r` 1 s cOn~ psi ti l_l c~ };mfxw~ khA „ r~3,. l , ti t1~ u Ses I n thE: u. - - - area . 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed txaAbta Aaq x(Rval/disapproval / tc of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee f i ndsAdOz%x=UxKkxrt tale proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: (a) All other conditions to remain in full force and effect. D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL (List here all conditions noted in Staff Analysis) E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner ConvOttee, pursuant to the aforementioned, -finds that the application of Mary F. Calistro for a change of conditions/ 'X"%YItV4t MK as described in the application should - be aproved/Wwximdt. _ 2 File flo. ZE-158-79 Moi,ion by: Thomas Seconded by: Kennedy Vote-, Approved 3 - 0 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE C- L t/ ' Chairman a -5:~, ATTEST: JAMES L.- MANSON Acting Planning Director By: 0 3 i S O K /k r-4 j--- t C O U IV -I- Y All PLANNING DEPARTMENT WALLIS D. I ILIB 3ARD, DIRECTOR September 28, 1993 Mr. Robert D. Waldo Waldo and Schweda Attorneys at Law North 2206 Pines Road Spokane, WA 99206-4756 SUBJECT : Planning Department File No. ZE-158-79 Dear Mr. Waldo: This correspondence responds to your letter dated August 3, 1993 wherein you request a determination of status regarding zone change file ZE-158-79. This project has been before the Spokane County Hearing Examiner and the Board of County Commissioners several times in the past. I believe the enclosed staff report dated May 8, 1980 under "Request" and the attached Findings and Order dated May 15, 1980 address your concerns. If 1 can be of further assistance, please contact me at 456-2205. Sincerely, j / TS1 EVE P. HOROBIOWSKI Current Planning Administrator Enclosures F-CU-WALDO LTR-9/28/93 Wr:ST 1026 BROADWAY Avr_Nur: • SPOKANE, WASI IINGTON 99260-0240 (509),156-2205 ROBERT D. WALDO WALDO AND SCHWEDA, P.S. TELEPHONE PETER S. SCHWEDA Attorneys at Law (509) 9243686 NORTH 2206 PINES ROAD FAX SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206-4756 (509) 922-2196 August 3, 1993 AUG U 5 1993 SPOKANE CpUN~i`( ~ Steve Horobiowski PEA~~NG pEPAR~MEN Spokane County Planning Dept. 721 N. Jefferson Spokane, WA 99201 RE: Request for Administrative Change Per Zoning Code Chapter 14.504 (ZE-158-79) Dear Mr. Horobiowski: The undersigned is attorney for the Estate of Ernest P. Quinn, deceased, the present owner of a parcel of real property containing approximately 8 acres fronting on Pines Road directly south of the Trentwood Elementary School. The Estate is in the process of attempting to sell the property, and in our efforts, it has come to our attention that the property was rezoned by Mary F. Calistro in 1979, ZE-158 - 79 , and that there is a very unusual term contained in the rezone order, "the property shall automatically revert to the pre-existing agricultural zone classification if the property is sold by Mary F. Calistro to another party prior to full development pursuant to the application." I am hereby requesting pursuant to Spokane County Zoning Code Chapter 14.504 that your office make an administrative determination to either remove the restrictive language which I have quoted above since zone changes generally run with the land and do not revert due to a change in ownership, or a determination be made that the language is no longer applicable since Mary F. Calistro has not sold the property and never will be capable of selling the property. /At this time I believe it is appropriate that I give you a little more history and background on the property. The rezone occurred in 1979 to allow for condominium development. An application in 1984 to increase the density and allow apartments was denied. In 1987 Mary F. Calistro lost the property as a result of a deed of trust foreclosure, and the new owner was Ernest Quinn who was the successful bidder at the trustee's sale, Trustee's Deed recorded as document number 8711190166. Thus Mary F. Calistro was divested of title without selling the property in 1987, the subsequent owner of the property has passed away, and now the estate is selling the property in liquidation of assets. Steve Horobiowski Spokane County Planning Dept. August 3, 1993 Page 2 of 2 If the property is allowed to revert to agricultural as if no rezone had occurred, then the market value and the salability of the property will be substantially affected. I would appreciate your response prom tly. Very tr ly ours 4 ~ ROBERT WALDO RDW/vla pc: Jim Emacio, 1+-- File No. ZE-158-79 SPOKANE COUNTY dD HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE U FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Hearing Examiner Committee on '1hNX1d Yx , May 8 1980, and the members of the Committee present being Ted McCourv~Ac_ting Chairman, Kenneth Kennedy and Eldon Thomas B. PROPOSAL The sponsor, Mary F. Calistro is requesting approval of a change of coeditionshmw , File No. ZE-158-79 to amend Condition No. 1 x~cxcxtdecc~cQcx~txc~c~clC Approval is granted for to be reworded to read: the sole purpose o condominium development.", and delete as presented by the sponsor, Mr. Shogren". Also to delete Conditions 2 and 3 of the original approval. C. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is Elementary School. residential, cultivated and undeveloped. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural until such time as development is completed in compliance with the conditions o e originafiappi,-O tached to the application. 4. That the provisions of RCW 43.21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda item have been fulfilled. 6. That the land in this dreg is suitable/9K9m4%aJ§%i6 for, the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification. 7. t the applicant has s not demonstrated tha onditions ha substanti changed since t iginal zoning of this ea and actor ly, the proposed rezone is not justifie . File No. ZLE-158-79 8. That the proposed use is compatible/ i ac4c i ~ ,,-kk~ q, with existing uses in the area. 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed c(ei -kheR.A&;Kp[v,(Kxai/di sapproval / kx of the proposed use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee f i ndshd x=txfcxi%d the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: (a) All other conditions to remain in full force and effect D. CONDITIONS OR CONTINGENCIES APPLIED TO THIS APPROVAL (List here all conditions noted in Staff Analysis) E. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Mary F. Calistro for a change of conditions/ xdxcl %-C-Ri ti4K as described in the application should be approved /SaJoaux*d. - 2 - File No. ZE-158-79 i ` Motion by: Thomas Seconded by: Kennedy Vote: Approved 3 - 0 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Chairman ATTEST: JAMES L. MANSON Acting Planning Director BY: 3 r= STAFF REPORT 0 0 g . s DATE: May 8, 1980 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-158-79, "CHANGE OF CONDITIONS" I. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Mary F. Calistro STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner REQUEST: The applicant is requesting that under "C Order", Condition No. 1, "Approval is granted for the sole purpose of condominium development as presented by the sponsor, Mr. Shogren", be reworded to read: "l. Approval is granted for the sole purpose of condominium development."; and that Conditions 2 and 3 under "C Order" be removed as follows: "2. If for any reason this project cannot be constructed, the zoning of the property shall be reverted to the Agricultural Zone. "3. That the sponsor in conjunction with the owner of the property record in the Spokane County Auditor's Office prior to a change in the Zoning Map by staff, a statement to run with the property which is the subject of the zone change application that the zone change is invalid, and the property shall automatically revert to the pre-existing Agricultural Zone classification if the property is sold by Mary F. Calistro to another party prior to full development pursuant to the application." PROPOSED USE: Condominiums PROJECT LOCATION: On the west side of Pines Road approximately 1,300 feet south of Trent. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 8.03 Acres. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Neighborhood is mixed. Trentwood Elementary School is to the north with single family and multi-family uses to the south and undeveloped acres in all directions. LAND USE: Site Undeveloped North Trentwood Elementary School East Cultivated and undeveloped West Single family and undeveloped South Single family and undeveloped ZONING: North Agricultural, established 1942 East Agricultural, established 1942 West Agricultural Suburban, established 1956 South Agricultural and Agricultural Suburban, est. 1942, 1956 ,.d- ZONE RE( ;SIFICATION NO. ZE-158-79 II. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The applicant states that Mr. Shogren cannot finance the project approved by the Hearing'Examiner Committee on November 15, 1979. The Committee conditioned the zone reclassification upon development of the site as submitted by Mr. Shogren. If Mr. Shogren does not develop the site, the zoning shall revert back to Agricultural. The Spokane County Health District finds that: 1.- This project lies over the Spokane Aquifer. 2. It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area No. 3 and within the service area of Irvin Water District. Groundwater resources appear to support development at this density. 3. The project is: inside the 201 Sewer Stud- Area (Zone 3); the Primary Sanitary Sewer Area recommended in the '208' Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities pursuant to County Resolution-80-0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage systems. III. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. No additional Conditions. b) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply. 3. The use of individual wells is not authorized. 4. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 5. Subject to disposal method approval by the Director of Utilities of Spokane County and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits by the Health Officer, the interim use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 6. The owner, his heirs and successors, shall agree to not protest legal assessments and utility local improvement districts to provide central* sewerage service to this lot. 7. A combined surface hater and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot. - 2 - (contd.) ZONE RE( 'SIFICATION NO. ZE-158-79 III. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED c) ZONING 1. All other conditions from original approval shall apply to any future site development. 2. The specific development plan will be submitted for Hearing Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. -3- T ~a~ °(l~+ti 99aGo V olz Olt ALP lj~~t ~C e~'&t YZ tie Chi e-j~~ i7, X979. Al" AAA WAOA- 535-r/zs ' .a-wa~;~cicr-5 RECEIPT DateAkwZ y/ . (3044 Received From i A ress 71 Collars for ACCOUNT HOW PAID - AMT OF CASHG ACCOJNT , AMT PA10 CHECK 9ALA DUE OROER NCE MONEY UY SK$Oba'~l'" - -4_1"=ile No. ZE-158-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE I 1 FINDINGS AND ORDER A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 20, 1979, (being a continuance of the November 15, 1979 hearing) and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas, Chairman, Jane Myers, and Ted McCoury and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change; Dennis Shogren for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural-to Multiple Family Suburban for the purpose of condominiums. B. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, school and undevelop- ed. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. 5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled. 6. That this proposal -is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion. 7. That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed condominium use. 8. That the proposed condominium use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 1 -`ile No. ZE-158-79 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed land use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee does not find the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the multi-family land use is being requested because the proposed use is condominiums which are only allowable within the Two-Family Residential zone (two condominiums) and/or Multi-family (more than two condominiums). C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Dennis Shogren for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be approved. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: 1. Approval is granted for the sole purpose of condominium development as presented by the sponsor, Mr. Shogren. 2. If for any reason this project cannot be constructed, the zoning of the property shall be reverted to the Agricultural zone. 3. That the sponsor in conjunction with the owner of the property record in the Spokane County Auditor's Office prior to a change in the zoning map by staff, a statement to run with the property which is the subject of the zone change application that the zone change is invalid, and the property shall automatically revert to the pre-existing Agricultural zone classification if the property is sold by Mary F. Calistro to another party prior to full development pursuant to the application. 2 -ile No. ZE-158-79 a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the byilding shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 3. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An appropriate on-site drainage disposal system shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 3. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Irwin Water District #6 and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 3 -ile No. ZE-158-79 2. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in _accordance__ within the concept presented} to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. g) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi- cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance. 4 -ile No. ZE-158-79 Motion by: Myers Seconded by: McCoury Vote: Unanimous H EA R I G EXAMINER COM TT E E Chairman ATTEST: FRED L. DAYHARSH Planning Director By: 5 I _r SPOKANE COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT Inter-Office Communication Date April. 1980 TO: Zoning Hea ng mmittee, Spokane Count FROM: Eugene C. ra her, R.S. SUBJECT: ZE-158-79 (Calistro Zalik) 1. Findings: a. This project lies over the Spokane Aquifer. b. It is within Critical Water Supply Service Area No. 3 and within the service area of Irvin Water District. Groundwater resources appear to support develop- ment at this density. c. The project is: inside the 201 Sewer Study Area (Zone 3); the Primary Sanitary Sewer Area recommended in the '208' Study. The method of sewage disposal is subject to approval of the Director of Utilities pursuant to County Resolu- tion 80-0418 adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of individual on-site sewage systems. 2. Recommendations: a. Water service must be coordinated through the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. b. Water service shall be by an existing public water supply. c. The use of individual wells is not authorized. d. Sewage disposal method shall be as authorized by the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. e. Subject to disposal method approval by the Director of Utilities of Spokane it County and subject to specific application approval and issuance of permits the Health Officer, the interim use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. f. The owner, his heirs and successors, shall agree to not protest legal assess- ments and utility local improvement districts to provide central sewerage service to this lot. g. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detailed plan shall be approved by the County Engineer and the Health Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot. do cc: Director of Utilities, Spokane County County Engineer, Spokane County Dennis Shogren, P.O. Box 14727, Spokane, WA 99214 Mary F. Calistro Zalik, East 4322 2nd Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 SCHD-ADM-118 ' OFF CE OF COUNTY ENGINEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date_ grit 22 Inter-office Communication To Zoning Administrator From County vngiaQQr Subject ZE 158,79 No additional conditions. Form 327-C R. 1 } E ' 5POI~ANE VALLtq FIRE DEPAPATIAtNT &~~a~& EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. * SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (5018) 928-1700 April 23, 1980 F Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator Spokane Grunter Planning Commission N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone changes have been reviewed for fire protection: ZE-158y-79 Calistr ZE- 0C-7.3 Gillis ZE-48-80 Scroggin. ZE-215-79 Tombari ZE-57-84 Redeemer Lutheran Church ZE-43-50 Allison,' ZE--5-80. Seipp The above need mains and, hydrants to be installed in their areas-. Access_ plans for firefighting equipment around the bu'ilding shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. incdr-ely, V Coo Lt. of Inspectors AC:sn APR 4 19 pz'Jpq,~4 'go jt kN'~~ G ry PREVENT FIRES - SA V LIVES r r AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Being 'rs duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of over ca the and a resident of the State of Washington, and age of eighteen years. , Il%Stl .M- f.1` a-4 f' AA A 19 Q That on the day of 4 *W, I -personally deposited in the U ited States mail at wit sufficient postage prepaid, a true and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached the reference, hereto and incorporated herein as to shown recorded real property owners on the Spokane County, Treasurer's records 19 of, Wthe ho day of ' have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) periphery of the applican,p"s controlled property and did notice adjacent property'. Owners to he t it by certified mail. The notices. were address individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated by the attachment attached hereto and incorporated .reference. DATED this C,~ ~ day of 19ffo• - U SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this day of 19acl WASHINGTON NOTARY PUBLIC IV AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, Residing at Spokane,. Washington APPLICATION NUMBER AGLNDA, MAY 8, 1980 TELEPHONE NO.: 456 - 2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721, Jefferson Street, Spokane 9:00 A.M. A. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS "k. I ZE-158-79 MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN - CHANGE OF CONDITIONS (Generally located 1,300 feet south of Trent Avenue on the west side of Pines Road. Section 9-25-44) Proposal: Eliminate conditions requiring a specific developer to construct condominiums, (''f#e Applicant: CALISTRO (1,56 Acres) 2. 7E-40C-73 LOCAL BUSINESS ~ CHANGE OF CONDITIONS (Generally located 335 feet south of Mission Avenue, between Mul1an and Argonne Roads. -Section 17-25-44) Proposal: Change of site plans. Applicant: GILLTS .85 Acres) 3. ZW-- 36-80 AGRICULTURAL TO FREEWAY COMMERCIAL~AND MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Generally located north of the Medical Lake - Four Lakes Road and vest of the State Highway No. 11 - Four Lakes, A. Section 23-24-41) Proposed Use: Body, Fender and Towing/Four-Flex Applicant: GOODNER .67 Acres) '1HE LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR THESE APPLICATIONS ARE ON FILE Ad D AVAILABLE IN THE .PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S OFFICE (ZONING SECTION). A topic of discussion at this hearing may be whether the Hearing Examiner Committee has adequate information to assess the adverse environmental impacts of the proposal. The State Environmental Policy Act WAC 197-20-330(2) provides that: In the event that the further investigations authorized by this section do not provide information reasonably sufficiert to assess any potential adverse environmental impacts of the proposal, an E. I.S. shall be prepared." I Proposed Use: Office Building. Applicant: REDEEMER LUTHERAN CHURCH .58 Acres) - kontd. ) VE R- t' _ - ~ Er" ~ 901L - NfEa . rL~~''~ts ~ R Aso its 1 Ew A v w i - o Z RA . ' F - r BU K E Y E Q BUCKEYE _ 3 4 ±u t OR. F JACKS A1ECO w oKTGOMERr 5 8m~ OR. QC Q. •.,p r.• •O W p EA M No4- ~ -44 EL /969 0 - P C1 `'1 .~tiTLc,p 9y aA. M A MANSFIELD H 2A N N O N r ' f L l 9 6!S O Z rjN/►NNO T OIAN A MCINTGOMFA*l t y J 90 co post 0 2 a 0 ►~oAA 1..w . e u sue., Z J. 0 Axw E Y Hn,gwgtL M 'NEIL SANTO 3 ~.~..ou" ou o w Q a~ a r. s z pra•.s x ~ I r LW a - 3 14=1000 ~A4 94 o0 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE } Being fir rt duly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was. and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-ore years. That on - ow_u 44 tA ,1#W, She personally poi ed a t,ue and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane CoOnty, to-wit: 4 1 I Applicant or Agent Subscribed and sworn to me 19 60 . NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington 7-42~ C2,111tw 17Y. ocv, A.10 za~i Yu~z.c,P .a.:-4~~~E l5P 99 ~'ec., 9-zS-v~ q ~A- -Elk q.~~e, G1a - 94~a L y H i- r I U M 1! 1 I t.1 I i v i h i STATE OF WASELLNGTON, ; COUNTY OF SPOKANE, 7 c1 t~ n .................._-.aA~~iai!-°V......ti....:..►:......i. r on oath deposes and says that he is the..........-__.~........R of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekh newspaper. That said n- NOTICE Of ACTION BY THE paper is a legal newspaper and It 1S now and has been for more than s:. SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING month-, prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to. publish- EXAMINER COMMITTEE Pursuant to the pravisOns of Chapter in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County 43.210 RCW, notice is hereby viven that Washinicton. and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an offit•• COmmspoSpokane e!anedidon 1 1 cdunry, 70 J9 Heartaing ke the action am;n maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, whir). CO described bekm said newspaper has been approved an a legal newspaper by order of the Sll- Any action to sr•t askte. enjoin, review erwise challenge such action on pcrior Court of the State of Waeltingon in and for lipo oroth the grounds of. non-compliance with the rrorov,tlensaf Chapter 43 71C RCA, IState mrironmien at Policy Act) shall be rIC) t. ? r' A C? r ~i t t commenced on January i1, 1990 or b4- • blued. The action taken by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee. police of which is hereby given. was as Followt_ 1~t ...I~ i iii,l~ ;1•.-l: ;li .:-i:i~... ni,..,. I i.• i - (1) Approved Acton Zone reclossitkalkn-from agricultural to nfutti.tamily suburban (7) Description. Divide ap newspaper once each week for a period of ...................wc, proximately 7.S6acrosfw the purpose of condominiums (3) Such action pertained to property 19.x. commoMy known as and-Or described weeks, commencing OII the`_.r~th day of. December as. Ad j. and west of I• Pines Ro ap prOximeteiy 1300 it, south of Trent id 441 Pertinent documents may be examined during normal county and ending on the....... 12th..... day of........... _.D-PImber...... 19. - 1- 9-business hours tat Ih* ment eni, NJ71 Spokane }efferti0countyn Planning Depart both dates inclusive. and that such newspaper was regularly distribtl street. Spokane. Washington 99760. its taubscribers duri of said / Phone (509► &567705. Notice Given By Dennis Snogrm Filed By Dennis Shogrem Purchaser 17 5-17 17 ~.2 >Subser sworn to before me this of I.113cep ier• • 19. i ol:trv Public in and f R esiding Fit: Spokane. W:1 i ~ County File # Sec. _ ? R'ge a..S T'ship AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S.S. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the 1 l day of 19 /G I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspi- cuous manner on the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which is the subject of the ACTION, to wit, the following locations: 1. 3,01 /V. 7'lAl 2. l 3. 4. DATED this day of .~c 19 . - LAe eve r. SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day of Dee-eMhee- 19 . Notary Pub 'c in and for the ate of Washington, residing at Spokane Rev: 4/17/79 i File 4- d Sec . V ri p %S R "ge AM Proponent Z0664e6y ee. IMEN THR E S H 0 L D D E T E_.RMI NATION PROPOSED/ DECLARATION OF O-:S-1011FICANCE (proposed/fi.nal) (significance/non-significance) 1 . Description of. Proposal: . 6Mr AMAC"351 FICATOOM I~~Ar A& "&rAj . 2'. Proponent' ;Soft jg04Wov C . 3. Contact Person : 04y*W#S S~Aeeiy Phone: ?.t*/- ytzr' 4 . County Action(s) Requested : V00' Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval: Final Plat Approval Change of Condition Other-: 5. Location of Proposal : _~r~~s eoa0 1.~ma ' 01F 'TENT _064D 6. Lead Agency: SPO,KAN E COUNTY, WASHINGTON ` This proposal has been determined to NOT have a significant adverse impact on the- environment. An :EI-S is, NOT required under RCW 41.21C.030 (,2) (c). Th'is' decision was made after review by the County of a completed environmental checklist and other 'information on pile with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed declaration-: Final Mitlarati6m; Name Fred L. bayharsh~_ - Name Signature Signature ► . YO Z' el' Title Director. Title Chai anon department P1 anni ng Department : Heari ng*L Exami_ner :Comm. Date October 31, 1979 Date Plovember 15, •1979 over Revised 6/11 /"79 r For Declaration ,of Significance Only: Date of Expected Draft E*fS Available (determined. by Responsible -Official) , Date of- Issuance TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONSIBLE OFFICIAL: a. Brief description and listing of those. environmental impacts leading to such declaration. b. Brief explanation of- what measures, if any, could be taken by the applicant to prevent or mitigate the environmental impact of the proposal to such an extent that- the responsible official could consider a revised proposal with a possible resulting declaration of non-significance. A4 - 4 A IY4 r - 4~-d- w ~O~ Let r 'ale. 1 A. ev- to -,c R FCEIVED N Q 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICA ON STATE OF WASHINGTON, fig. COUNTY OF SPOKANE, ~ JOHN t✓...-V1~-ilJw1'..t" being first duly- sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the ..............EDITOR - of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekh newspaper. That said n-,-• - NOTICE OF ACTION MY THE paper is a legal newspaper and it. I,; now and has been for more than air. sEXAMINECOUNTY R ECOMMITTEE 3 months prior to the date of the publicut.ion hereinafter referred to. published Pursuant to the provisions of Chaster in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane Coullty. 43-21C notice is hereby qIvan that the spokerw kerx Count Hearing Examiner Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an offivi Mdid on I yy loteeelow 120 T9 take rneaction desu inaintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which desvlt~y below An action to set aside, enjoin, review -aid newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Su- Or otherwise chaltenpe such aclion on the grounds of tan compliance with the ijer:or Court (+f the State of Washington in and for Bpoka,ii_± ,1lnt-, Mitt t.hc~ prowls+onsof Chaptor 43 TIC RCW (state a Policy Apt W shall o be b&-red 0 on January 11. 1410 or be Notice of Action commenced . b&-red :l,,P('`Ivl +r a tT"tiP (,n F1v of The action taken oy the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Commute. notice Of w411Cf. Is hereby given. Was es follows. (1) approved Action: Zone roclassiticatloo from agricultural to ;I-- it t+ubli 'tlei] in r(>~u,ur i>euu~ i:In i art in _<Uj;l icn+( nt f<,rtrt), of F.-lid multi family suburban 12+ Descri tion Divide ap two prox+mairly 754acresfor ttte purpose of newspaper once each week for a period of........................... .....................consecutive condominiums (3) Such Action owialneo to property t:ommonly known as and-or described 5th December ?9 as: Adj. to and West of Pines Rd. ap weeks, commencing on the..............-...day of...... proxlmetety 13M If south of Trent Rd (4) Pertinent documents may be examined during normal county December and ending on tZtie.... _ 19.7.9.--. business hours III t 5 ne County 12th day of strePlanStreet. ing 5pok Washington Washingnglon 94160 Jef9260 both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to Phone 15M) 456-2205. ite Kubseribers duri of said iai. Notice Given Dawns Shogcha ~ F ired By Denn: nis Shogun, Purchaser 12-5-12 12 - Nubser' a sw to before me this 12th................ day oz... . Deceaab , l Nat:1r. Public in tend 1 •'lle State of Washington. Residing at.: Spokane. NcA County File # 4b - IS~- Sec. R'ge a,,:!r T sh'p - NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY jq4rqmi*7ees PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW, NOTICE 15 HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE SPOKANE COUNTY tlegAiM rorfinflicAs 60MMi''74t4ee. DID ON I' _Qe TAKE THE ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR. OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS 'OF NON-COMPLIANCE~WITHN-THE--PRO--4r VISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW. (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) HALL BE COMMENCED ON /11 (30 days from date of 2nd news- paper publication) OR BE BARRED. THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY &QAj'k? &r41n1*APR. n1nfh1#Ce_ NOTICE OF WHICH IS HEREBY GIVEN, WAS AS FOLLOWS: (1) APPROVED, ACTION: one Ae14<S1'~ie9_0A - gom q4Rie4A(RgN0 mkl4 _farw ~ 64buR6q,? 4 (2) DESCRIPTION: 61VU APpRo MAJ 4 -7Ze ACRES F-0/4 ~rflg' Pu0031~ of 'C©MPOOfi NIWnj (3) SUCH ACTION PERTAINED TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS AND/OR DESCRIBED AS (street address per general location) : l Sao ~'l So crTN o F ~fR ~'~r7' RA . (4) PERTINENT DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING NORMAL COUNTY BUSINESS HOURS AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, 99260 PHONE: (509) 456-2205 NOTICE GIVEN BY: n:5A0QReA-, FILED BY: NAME: bCAnis :5hpqAerL TITLE: kqeksep, SIGNATURE s-r- Revised 4/"17/79 STnrE o~ 10 ° STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY % z WASHINGTON Olympia, Washington 98504 206/753-2800 Dixy Lee Ray Governor TO: Transamerica Title Insurance t FROM: OA Me. AIZ The Washington State Department of Ecology headquarters office (Olympia) has received and recorded the following "Notice of Action Taken" pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. This notice is now on file and available for review upon request. Acting agency: Spokane County Type of action taken: Approved zone reclassification to "Multi- Family Suburban," for condominiums Project: On 756 acres; adjacent to and west of Pines Road, approx. 1300 feet south of Trent Road. Date received: December 13, 1979 DOE file number: NAT-791225 This letter indicates only filing of the notice of action with the Department of Ecology. It does not indicate concurrence with the format or contents of the notice, or compliance with all provisions of RCW 43.21C.080. If you have any questions, please contact the Environmental Review Section, (206) 753-6892. ECY 010-4-50 Rev. 6/78 3 4b STAFF REPORT DATE: NOVEMBER 15, 1979 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANN ING. DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-158-7 1. GENERAL I'NFORMATIDN APPLICANT: Dennis Shogren STATUS OF APPLICANT: Purchaser PROPERTY OWNER: Mary F. Calistro REQUESTED ZONING: Multi-Family Suburban ~ EXISTING ZONING: Agricultural PROPOSED USE: Condominiums PROJECT LOCATION: Can the unrest side of Pines Road approximately 1 , 300 feet south of Trent. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION } SITE SIZE: Approximately 7.56 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS. Site is relatively flat and is totally un- developed NEIGHSORHDOD CHARACTER: Neighborhood is mixed. Trentwood Elementary School is to the north with single family and multi-family uses to the south and undeveloped acres in all directions. LAND USE:, Site Undeveloped North Trentwood Elementary School East Cultivated and undeveloped West Single family and undeveloped South Single family and undeveloped ZONING: North Agricultural, established, 1942 East. Agricultural, established, 1942 West Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 South Agricultural, established, 1942 Agricultural Suburban, established, 1956 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIC ,'NUMBER: - - N4' Z E 158 79 Il. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential neighborhood NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 0 NUMBER OF UNITS PROPOSED: 80 Total Square Feet of Coverage Approximately 62,000 sq. ft. I Total Square Feet 84,000 sq. ft. Percent of Coverage 18.80 Proposed Density 10.58 units/acre Surrounding Density 4.2 units/acre ' MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES: 2 stories PARKING REQUIRED: 120 PROVIDED: 145 Ill. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS This site was submitted for zone reclassification and heard November 17, 1978 (ZE-131-78). The plan proposed 172 units on approximately-8 acres and was denied without prejudice. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. 2. Mains and hydrants need to be installed in the above areas. Access plans for firefighting equipment around the bU-ilding shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 3. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Access permits shall be obtained from the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An appropriate on-site drainage disposal system shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. 2 ZONE RECLASS'IFICATIOP UMBER: ZE-158-79 ' .4 IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) 3. The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Irwin Water District #6 and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. No comments received. e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated b,y the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. 2. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. f) ZONING 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific I'andscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Adminis- trator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 3 r-- 06 G ~ yr► .T YY c gam O"a ✓ ~ / 1.-~ r ) ~ j A l ''i`ce' ~i~ r , olloov AGENDA, NOVEMBER 15, 1979 TELEPHONE NO.: 456-2205 SPOKANE COUNTY ZONING HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Place: Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor North 721 Jefferson Street, Spokane 1:30 P.M. (contd.) C. ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS (contd.) 8. ZW-186-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (West of Johannsen Road and Rosswood Street) Proposed Use: Condominiums Applicant: HUME (4.3 Acres) 9. ZE-116-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Nora Avenue, 1,800 feet East of Pines Road) Proposed Use: Multiple Family Applicant: HAFFNER (2.76 Acres) t 10. ZE-158-79 AGRICULTURAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY SUBURBAN (Pines Road, 1,300 feet South of Trent Road) Proposed Use: Condominiums Applicant: SHOGREN (7.56 Acres) 11. ZE-159-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESIDENTIAL MOBILE HOME (Adams Road, 580 feet North of Trent Road) Proposed Use: Mobile Home Park and Existin Rentals Applicant: RENNER ?2.76 Acres) 12. ZE-119-79 AGRICULTURAL TO RESTRICTED INDUSTRIAL (Northeast corner of Trent Road and Sullivan Road) Proposed Use: Retail, Wholesale, Warehousing Applicant: FOGG (17 Acres) 5:00 P.M. - - - - - ADJOURNMENT -2- ff1 FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE _ N 811 Jefferson ~ , d t ~ ` '~,4 ~t 4t to 456-5786 ,ft -!A, SPOKANE WASHINGTON V4M 99260 00 November 14, 1979 SPOnANC COUr.t.- CJURT HOUSE TO:. FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS: ZN50-79, ZE-155-79, ZE-163-79, BW-101-79, ZE-189-79, ZN-2-57, ZW-186-79, ZE-116-79, ZE-158-79, ZE-119-795 ZN-128-79, ZE-159-79 `1 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required. A plot plan showing property use and development is required, A plot plan showing property use and development in relationship to water for fire flow must be submitted for approval prior to land use or development. LD/ba E I R E E D Nov 1 /1 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT OFl--iCE OF COUNTY ENGItvEER SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Date November 8 IF 19_7_9 Inter-office Communication To Zoning Administrator From County Engineer ' Subject ZE 158-79 #5 #18 #20 Form 327-C.R. FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N. 811 Jefferson 456-5786 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99201 r. October 31 , 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE TO: FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM: LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE: ZONES RECLASSIFICATIONS Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water is required for the following zone changes. A water plan is required to be submitted prior to any development or use of subject lands. November 6, 1979 Hearing: ZW-85-79 ZN-179-79 ZW-178-79 ZN-180-79 ZN-125-79 ZE-65-79 ZE-157-79 ZE-194-79 ZE-216-79 ZE-94-71 November 15, 1979 Hearing: ZN-50-79 ZE-155-79 AN-128-79 ZE-163-79 E C , ZW-101-79 R E ' V ZE-189-79 E ZN2-79 NOV 5 1979 ZW-186-79 ZE-116-79 SPOKANE COUN ZE-158-79 PLANNING DEPART ZE-159-79 MENT ZN-134-79 LD/ba L 5POIKANE VALLE(I FIRE DEPARTIAENT S&I"ee- G~~ ~ae, I-V"AeZ~w VtW (/l/ / EAST 10319 SPRAGUE AVE. • SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99206 • TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 November 6, 1979 Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator N721 Jefferson Spokane, Washington 99260 Dear Ms. Raines, The following zone changes h,a' ve been reviewed for fire protection: ZE-155-79 Bracken r ZE-163-79 Hitchcock.,! ZE-189-79 Medicus~ ZE-116-79 Haffner,o X158-79 Sho4rdn r° ZE-159-79 Renner,,,,,,' ZE-119-79i Fogg, Mains aAdAyjd?an''s~need bey'{'ins~taI'Ied in the.abAe areas. Access "plans. for ~irefirght~~.4g,equi~nt around th6 building shall Ni be approv6d 'pri W to°~,bu~' din pei^irii,t, i ssuahce ° - Xr .o TAli ~ Y ...Jl•` r:.Yyf~lY ~iM. '1~n~' h'~r+~O'1!~ I .M ~ ~ ' 1 ook Lt. of Inspectors AC.sn t. SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States foAmerica and a resident of the State of Washington, and age of eighteen years. That on the / 5CI/I day of Ae✓e- r6ev- ' 1979, I personally deposited in the United States mail at 114 . with su!fi c ient p stage p epaid, a true and correct copy 161 of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached reference, to the hereto and incorporated herein taxpayers, as shown recorded real property on the Spokane Count Treasurer's records 19 of wthe ho a'Y~ day of ~r~r~- ' four~ndred have been found to own property withiin a (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and did notice adjacent property owners to the site by certified mail. The notices were addressed di ated those individuals and sent to those nadresses as herein by the attachment attached hereto a reference. DATED this day of ~OtJP~~.' 19~• SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this day o 19~. dv NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SPO' E COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington APPLICATION NUMBER s=.~ w 4 + 7 A PLANNING DEPARTMENT ' BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 SPOKANE COUnIr COuA7 nOuSE CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM Tv !Department of Ecology ~ School District # J L 1 (Est v11+ y) .Spokane County Health District 7. Department of Game (Inter-Office) %4-Department of Social and Health 8. Department of Natural Resources Services Fire District # 9. State Parks & Recreation Commission V'•Water District # L UA. 5PO• ervy NAW eoMMttS1OW S72 v I N w*rait w sr- Al. N V D , toi C0000 0 A 04 L~ FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for' the following project: 2E.-tSTw791 9-mss - t! _ ,4~. rs IFS s M-0 S-A&AJ C6 ; Sl ~4t,~t~S F~eoM ,4C&-. 0-64C CQn/S tlC7rI0A/ Or- 16 CdN06MIN1d Mt * p/A/ers Qp~ 300 3 . Ore TRat,crr Qor►~,~ , sCV~ o c ~,uTwooo oc.E ~.~~vra~t y. This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates your agency to be an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3) Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as pro- vided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on October 31, 1979 Please respond, if appropriate, at your earliest opportunity, but no later than the public hearing scheduled for November 15, 1979 The subject proposal or action IS 19) LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIG- NATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE OURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER ENVIRON- MENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) or a Ground Water Impact Evaluation (GW I E) should be prepared. Enclosures Rev. 4/17/79 e File # • . _ rte; s:. - - Sec. 9 T'sh'p R'9e Classification 46 7b /"1/3' Proponent SPOKANE COUNTY COURT MOUSE S P O K A N E C O U N T Y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 1. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subse- quently been reviewed by the -_0Ae1A1L-3 The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Actions(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval ; Final Plat Approval ; Change of Condition Other B. Description of Proposal: Pr2amZ 7.~7o &,aa S FXf-7 A6 Tv MFs Fog _ ZZOE n©AkS Y-JCXo cl oX:_ $0 cue XD Q t'11 cu 1 JMS C. Location of Proposal: Pr t~4P s ZbAQ . 1,,~c1D PPP T S6,r_r4 OF 2AV7 .1 1 • II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) Earth (8) ~~Land Use (15) Energy (2) _ZAir (9) =Natural (16) Utilities Resources (3) __,,,:fWater (10) Risk of Upset (17) Human Health (4) lora (11) _ZPopulation (18) Aesthetics (5) 2!!~Iauna (12) Housing (19) Recreation (6) Noise (13) _,ZTrans/Circ (20) Arch/Hist (7) __j,.,::fLight/Glare (14) _.Public (21) Other Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions:(3.),St7E is nyr-, '7rrS~at~c ,~~c1~FE2 Revised 6/1/79 C. Discussion of impacts identified above: Ill. Conclusions and Recommendations: Based on this staff review of the environmental checklist, the staff: A. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and recommends/issues a proposed declaration of non- significance. B. Concludes that there are no potentially significant adverse impacts and, because of the nature of the proposal, recom- mends/issues a final declaration of nonsignificance. C. Concludes that potentially significant adverse impacts do exist and recommends/issues a declaration of significance. IV. Staff member(s) reviewing checklist: Revised 6/1/79 Lt P b l - ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST - -f- . - - File 9 ZE-/Sr_ see"", DOHA" 00V.. i,tlY.L Sec-Twp-Rng 9~Z.S Introduction: The State Envirorotntal Polity.A'ct of 1471, Chapter. 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governments agencies 'to consider-environmental values, both for their own actions and when all private 'proposals. Tile Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be-pr~epared -for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as'.per 'WAC' 19744 -affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist-is to help the- agencies 44vo 1 ved d'etermi ne whether or-not a proposal, is-such a ,major action. Please answer the following questions as- completely as you can with the information presently, available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" 'or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be award of, and cancer themselves with the dea_ree.of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required.,or where you believe an explanati'gn would be helpful Oo government decision-makers, include your explanation in We space provided, or use additional rages, if necessary. 'You should include references to any reports 'or-studies of 'Which.:you are-aware-and which are re evant to the answers you.,provide. Complete answers -to these questions now will help•all agencies =involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questfons'apply, to your total, proposal-, not Just- to the license for~~which"you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which wi1,l be- caused by your proposal when ft is-completed, even though completion-may not occur until sometime tr fhe~ future. This will al-low all of 'the agencies which will be involved to' complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be.processed until the checklist- has,been,completed and returned to the.appropriate .County department. State law r uires ex lanations-for eve " es' and "mavbe" answer on the checklts,t. The 'person completing the form may be required to provide _explanation for "no" answers, and 1n some cases, more detailed information to aid in a, threshold- deteirination. NOTE: This is a standard form being.used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of'proposals. Hdpy,.of. the questions '0ay not apply to your proposal. If a question' does not apply,, just` answer it "no"' and continue .on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CkECKLIST'FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponept: ~ E Cl° x0,61W/S ,.Sfl 'hone Number 9Z~- yd;7S 2. Address of Proponent: t? O. 60X / V72 7 S~o.Ci9.✓C _ ,w~4. 9 9Z .3. 'Date Checklist Sul rrd tted: 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: SAO - Name of Proposal, if Applicable:AeI S. Mature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its-size':'generat design elements; and other factors that will,give an accurate understanding of its scope 'and nature): Z4644F :5_~ S/F/eiP-r/oR/ F~o~ i4Cr~/CtCGTSe ,?ll ',0V, S. t~~'! lDQ~t!!✓i~sr~rS) 7. Locatioq. of Proposal, (describe the physical setting of the Prooosal as `wel l as the extent of the, 1'and area affected by. any environmental impacts, i ng1tidi ng any other i jfforma ti'on needed- to give an accurate understanding` of the, envi ronmental setti-no of the proposal) : I-iWo4.T~B ~i✓ T~'~~ s E V*LC-E je' ,+4677;~eC-.4Vr- To .Wb Ales-1- OF 0 8'75 fAu 7;4 B` 7;VZW7' oeb - TAE S., rE i5 o SE.vre J~eAQ-vvz- b 4>a,0,1/7- To 7,2Eirr: F~4E.~F~/esi ,SB49Z 8.• Estimated, Gate for Campieti,on of P1=no6sal: 7. ! sst of- all Permita, Licenses or Government Aoorovals 'Reauired.,ar Lhe Proposal (federsj, state, arc loco;i i nc ldd'i rig rezones ; : ?DAZE C T'a*.C J . ,(iF SPACE FOR c::PLsi;l; T MN :S 1NADEQUATE. PLEASE ATTACH nODCTTONIL PAGES.) Ina. 0_you-, or the, owner fo the event vob do lot own the subject land, have any plans for' future 3rd`iti>>ns-. expansion, or fukher activity relaiea co or connected with this ardbosal?_ if .yes, exolain: O 1 ~ 10b. 00 you own or have optiohs on land neafty or adjacent to this proposal'',s location,? If yes, expl,ai.n: 1VO 11. :qo you, know of any, plans by,dttters includfng.' the owner whith may, affect the property. covered by your ,proposal or' land .adjacent or ;nearby? V yes, explain: A10 1,2. Attach any -otherapplication form t. t h8s been completed regarding the-propcsaI'if none'has:been tompl eted, but is expected to 'be filed 'at~- some future date, describe the nature of such appl i cation form: .,5Ej5 Z-OAIE e?_A441PVOLr__ II. VIVIROMMENTAL `IMPACTS (Explanations of- all "'yes" and "maybe" answers are requi'rea) Yes "Aaj~be No 1. E` Will the proposal result in: t- ,(a) Unsi a61 a earth condi•ti ons or- 'i n changes i n. 'geo 1 ogic structures? . . . . . . . . f b)'.01sfruptions, displacements,. compaction or -overcovering of the soil? . . . . . )L ,(c) Change in topography or gftdrid, surface relief features? (41 The des•tructlan,- covering,or modification "of any unique geologic .or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~(e) Any, i ncrease -u n wi nd or water Bros iaq 'or soil's, ei ther on or off 'the site?. . (IF SPACE FOR-EXPLANATION'hS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH AODITIONWPAGES:) (f)„ Changes -fin deposition of-erosion of beach -sandsI or changes in siltation, degositiori or erosion which,may ,.modify. the channel of ',a river,or stream or the -bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet,or lake? . . . . . . . . . . Explanatfim: 2. A_ Will the, proposal resul t An: -Yes Maybe No (a). Ail 'gnisslons Or deterioration .of ambient .410 quality? . . . . . . . . . . . (b) The !creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or- temperature, or any change in climate., either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .L ExplainAtion: stiF *r-n 4Lwri3 3. 'dater.. Will the 'proposal, result 1,n: Yes ~Ma~ 0e No (a) Change in currents,-or the course,or direction of water movements, in efther'marfhe or, ;Fresh waters? . , b) Changes- in absorption Crates, -drainage patters, or -the, ra-te,,and amount of -`surface;'water runoff? . . . . . . . . . X - ('c) Alterations to the course or-flow of flood waters?. . . . . . . . . . (d) ;Change, i,n the amouht of surface water in, any water b dy? . . . . . . . . . . X (e) Discharge intq surface water, or in any alteration :of surface water qi tl i ty, incTudi ng but not limited to temOeratur§, dfssol,ved oxygen or t061di"ty? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1C (f) Alteration-of the directtbn or rate, of -1'1'& of ground waters?. . . . . . . (g) Change in 'the quantity of ground waters-, eitther..hrougn direct-% ad¢i tions' or, wi thdr!aaa 1°s., ~r . thr ough i nterceptfor_ o-f, an aouifer by cuts or excavations? (h.) Oeterioration, in,ground water quality., either thrdugj direct injection,. or through `tie., seeflage or l-eacnate, Qhospates, detergents waterborne virus or bacter•i°a. or other substances into the' ground waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (i,) Reduction! Tn' the.,armount of dater otherwise available for pub.i i c water suapi,i es? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . n Exolanatioh: 4. Flrora, Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No, (a) ChpngeAn the diversity of species; or nuber of any 'species of flora. (including trees, thri bs, .grass, crops, mi:ciroflora, and aquatic plants')? . (b) Reduction of the riubers of any unique, rare or endangered species !of flora?. . . . . . (c) Introduction of new' species of flora into an area, ;or in a barrier to the normal-repTenfshment of existing species? . _ (d) 'Reduction to acreage of -any agricultural chop? . . . . . lExclanation: SF4C )4Vr774e#4F2> 5. Fad, Will the proposal resuft in: Yes Maybe No (a) Ganges i,n the diversity of species or number of aqy, species of fauna `(,birds, find,animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, -beniAic organisms, insects =or microfauna)? . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of ' the, numbers -of any unique, rare,, or endangered A, ,species of fauna?, . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . (c) Introduction-of new species of fauna into an area, or-result In a,barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . ('d) Deterioration of 4xisiing NO or, wwildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . . 1L "EX Ianation•- b. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a.) Will the ptooosa"l increase ezistiolg' nojse levels? . . . , . . . . . . . . .x Exalanation: SEE A-TT14C h`C- j 7. Light and Glare Yes Maybe No (a.) Will the proposal ,produce new light or glare?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exolanation: ..SSE /-~TT/Qe/`~~:~~ 8. Land Use. Yes Ma_vbe No (a) Wi11 the prooosaI result i~ the a`teration, os the present or planned Tand use of an' area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation' : SEE 9. Natural R#sourc_s•. Will the proposal' result fnt:, ?es Wavbe,. 11b ('a) increase in _he rate of use of any, natural resources. . . . . . . . . . . (a) 3ecile*i,on o-' any no0'Srte abla na uraY rasa+irce?- E.calaitaeion: (A-b~l Nc. ~(~Be.eT~w~:r-t'©,t °T 3 1. • 10. . Mak of. Upset. Oces the proposal fivalve :a risk of an explosion or the Yes Maybe No re„ease o r hazardous substances (i nc ludi n4, but ;not ,1 imi"ted to. _oi-l., " pesticides,., chemicals; or'radi`ation in the event :of an accident-or ' upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 11. Population. Yes Maybe No Will' proposal alter- the 1_ocatton, distrl,bution, "density, or growth rate4f the,-human population of an area?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . & Explanation: _ SEE ATTAR CHEF 12. Housino. Yes. Maybe No e proposal affect existing housing, or create, a, demand for Y addi ti ona+l housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: SEZ- A-7-rtfe- IZC-b 13. Transportation/Circulation. 'Will' the proposal result in: Yes Maybe , No ,(A)f Generation of additional vehicular movement: . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Effects on existing par`klnq ,facilities:, or demand, for new, parking? (c) .Impact upon existing, transportation systems? . X (d) Alterations "to, present patterns of circulation or-movement of people and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (e) Alterations to waterborne, railior air irtOic?. . . . . . . . . • . . . . , (f) Increase in traffic hazards- to, rotor vehicles, bicjrclists; or pedestrians? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Exnl'anation: .SEE 47"779 6OV4E:~& 14. Public 'Services. Will the proposal have,an, effect upon, or resin? It. Yes, "Mai be No- in a need or new'or--altered governmental services fn any of the fo,l;lowing, a_reas`: (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : ,(b), Police protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ • ('c), Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (dj; Parks or other recreattont facilities? . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . le), Maintenance of.pubtic facilfil-es, including roads? . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Other governmental-services? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . jc Explanation: .SftE A-7774C mz~ 15. Energy. Vi 1 i the oroposal result in:. Yes Mayne No (4) Use of "substantial amounts of- fuel, or energy?. . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Demand upon exist-Ina sources of energy, or- reouire hie dev6,i o;men;t of new sources or energy? . . . . . . . . Exol anati"on: ..set 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, Yes Maybe No or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Pager or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..~L. (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Y (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or patential health hazard (excluding mental health)?. . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or Yes Maybe No view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Y~ Explanation.: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or Yes Maybe No quantity of existing recreational opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: 9-0. Archeological/'Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a Yes Maybe No significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building?. Exolanation: l I. SIGNATURE 1, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, snould there be any will- full misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw anv declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue "n reliance upo this checklist. Date: _//e Proponent: (please Print or -ype) Prooonent: SffDerje6W 6C. ,address: i?d• Od X A 17Z 7 5 A,61*V-E Phone: 92- S1 - J,(s 7-5- Person complecina far -'IoNyV JrES" Phone: 92Z-ZZZ~ Date: 10-3-757 7/ rz"E 4n9. Ceoar :ment or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: -(;ArMf(r ✓~~J,~7t!~'~. ``Leff Members; Reviewing Checklise: _ E ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. Earth (b) Construction of units, parking areas, and access roads will require some compaction and overcovering of the soil. The results should not be significantly adverse. (c) Topographic features will be modified to accomodate construction and drainage. The impact should be minor. (e) Wind and water erosion of soils should be limited to the site and only occur during actual construction. Proper construction techniques should mitigate any adverse effects. 2. Air (a) Some air emissions may result from individual automobile uses. The amount of automobile air emissions should be minimal. 3. Water (b) Alteration of existing on-site drainage patterns will be necessary for proper drainage. Employment of acceptable engineering techniques should minimize any significant effects. (h) Use of septic tanks will discharge some effluents into the ground water. The amount of discharge should foot cause sig- nificant deterioration of ground waters. 4. Flora (a) The number of certain species of wild grasses may be reduced. (b) Landscaping may introduce some new varities of domestic flora into the area. 6. Noise The proposal will create new sources of noise associated with high density residential uses. Proper site design should minimize any adverse impacts. 7. Light and Glare The proposal will create new sources of light and glare from home lighting and street lighting. Proper location and design should negate any adverse effects. t I + r 8. Land Use The present use of the site will change from vacant to multiple family use. The area will however remain in residential use. 11. Population The density of the immediate area will be increased but the effects on population of the general area will probably be negligable. 12. Housing Existing housing will be increased by 80 units. No demand for new housing should occur. 13. Transport ation/Cir'c'tilatIon (-a, b & c) Additional vehicular movement will result from the proposal which in turn will generate demands for new parking. These demands will be satisfied by on-site parking. Additionally, the proposal will have a minor impact on existing transportation systems. (d) Present patterns of circulation may be altered to a slight degree. (-f) Additional vehicular movement will increase the potential of traffic hazards but proper design should minimize this potential. 14. Public Services (-all) These services will be needed for the proposal. Only minor alterations to existing services should be necessary to adequately meet these needs. 15. Standards consumption of energy for heating, cooling and light- ing will result which will place a moderate demand upon existing energy sources. 16. Utilities (all) The proposal will require alteration or installation of these utilities. The impact should not be significant. ' 4 j OFFICE OF THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Date NovembeA 1 ` 19 79 To W. L. Cteanwatvtz, Mayon - MiUwood Town Counc it From ZONING` Subject HeaAin Examiner Committee Meeting - November 15, 1979. Attached are %eque.6t6 Jor zone rec eaab.i6.ica tions Located in an area that yocvc. agency may want to review and comment on. Ptea.ae have att comment6 uAmned to thi,6 o66ice by November 9, 1979. Thank you, Z GARRV . THOMPSON A6.6 ,6 tart Zoning A&nin.iatAa for Attachment.6 - ZE-158- 79 GRT:cmw w R E C E I V E W13 (I - 1900 MEMORANDUM SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO: Zoning Hearing Committee FROM: County Utilities Department -14 DATE: May 6, 1980 1W SUBJECT: ZE-158-79 (Calistro Zalik) Recommendations: (1) An on-site sewerage system be allowed under the rules and regula- tions of the Spokane County Health District. (2) The owner, his heirs and successors shall agree not to protest legal assessments for any utility local improvement district to provide central sewerage service to this property. (3) Water service shall be provided by Irvin Water District in accor- dance with the Coordinated Water System Plan for Spokane County. FORM A L G D APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION ~j SPOKANE COUNTY Date: GG rl Application No: 79 Name of Applicant: 6-irt'A1 e4o. 11.66 "S J;60(0 "6/V ) Street Address of Applicant: 'r. /.rsrc 16 Alle. City: .510164*4e State:- 4-44. -Telephone No. Existing Zoning Classification: hWI1 ` i i,7-",g- Date Existing Zone Classification Established: V-'24/-#Z. Existing Use of Property: I¢/V 7 Proposed Zone Classification: N' Imo: .5. Proposed Use of Property: CewP 0A" / iY/At01-C Legal Description of Property: 74- 64- t -yooy a/-- 7;Y,-=- A/'. i~ of l~. l Df Jsi5Cr7w 91 4/44 4&. k1..0. 1> A. d~C s~~ L~ s,, ciTlo N 9 f i "~v~E Soccns/ ~cL /rt~it~./Nt~ At-r7 7M-c Al-Imo. &MeNO 3~: r , ,•u ems' Wes r C.9-,Z, 7 Err g2! ,E 1 &F- ,4/. 4.37. It fir, T 5 5AL7 - 457??. 7 iEET 7-o 72$446 Ai 17 0,F ['~E4~/•!/,U~~yc . S/ 7Zc o4-T~' /IV SOb&AWW e. 4Gt, A T V W N4,- raw I We Section: Township: 2.5- Range: 4y Source of Legal: T LC 4p.yl,oOe±W~ Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) D9S44'1~' 900! Property Size: 7, 5-0 t' loe'?4 '.S Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: /10445 Street Address of the Property: & - . G ~CIC C9/- AlN '`S Who Holds Title to the Property: If you do not hold title to the property affected by this application, what is your interest in it?- )0a G AoeAs Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. -1- aq Application for Zone Reclassification (Continued) ALL OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS MUST BE ANSWERED: 1. What are the changed conditions, of the site and the area, which you feel make this proposal warranted? 7V6 S1 rC /.S A-4 ZrA4f CIVT 7v edrll 9:: #°ceV,,1 a Se- MOO ~ 197y6 A 04AUD2 A rci2 1.*4Z- c~ou.~'~~2 STr2~c~7:' eow7- 2.~NE ellow&cs 11,m g- 6,6 IoV Mir Ae/c1¢ AJ111e/1 A*i_c' a, s/A*1,e,.fW o6S g 2 . What effect will the proposed zone reclassification have on the adjacent properties? Ab v eecj44' e4FAeFd fS. 7~ aS6' of 771W se 7~5 CA~/~D sst i.y~cc.rx S' S~Ybt~ L,a ~,E ~'/~T/Sf~-C Td.r y 3. Can a reasonable return from a reasonable use of the property in question be secured under the existing zone classification? (If no, why?) A . e, 4- T/Dti Z> SC77-IA ' o~o A45-, P T V F 7#,*U 7YtOl eAG S%-VCr4t Iz--.f -;W /L I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge, in accordance with the requirements of the Spokane County Planning Department and the laws of the State of Washington. (Signed) (Date) -2- r Y ~ .r "YAW fir( 41 • ~ ~ (r~• ~1•y`LJI1T~7 ~L'i' ' ~V ~ j~4'.~i~r•1~, r s•.:.'e .r 4e;oo~ f 1~y.I~ • ZONING %V(33-,KSuEET Form C :application Li- ZE' 139'79 Thi:S dtDcumle;1C '.will provi6e the P:3nning De-r'artmmen L S)taif with %Nrit,en verification that. 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable. That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provi red for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to present a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN wi_h this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in sequence listed PART I - to be comcleted by Spokane County Engineer - pr?liminary consultation meeting has been geld ~.:,ith the "poka^e C^untr Engineer' 71C,- an ` ! ---.7- Dr^po-_;?d 'i! : ~lCpm_ nt has ;een ret~i,? ;tire;; 1) to to DOT Review required: Ye s N o . 2) ccess to be limited to: 3) ccess permit is required. 4) a . , &dication for right-of-way is required. ( feet on RC,d , Street :Ter.u, . } b. Radius ( foot) is required. (On and Roan c . Slope easement is required S) IIA-12-Drainage Plan is required. on-site off-site . 47 6) Paving Permit is required. L- feet on po-ad. ) 7) Curb is required, (along Road , Street , Avenue.) 8) Sidewalk is required. (along Road, Street, venue. ) .~.onlic?nt :usr he willing, to participate in future LIT /Fl' . 10 -I.ecal c es^:'i_~icn is J°.v~~ . Parcel Comments: Sign ~',3te ZCNING WORKSKFET-continued-? P RT_ti -t: be bv- :;oo";arl ounty Utiliti°2s Deoar,7en~ A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane Coun[y Utilities Department and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development is is no ocated in a public sewer service area operated and maintained by Spc;:ane C"~ur.ty 2) A storm drainage pla inot required for the proposal. Comments:Z S gned Data Water A. Water Supply 1) The proposed development is located with lT_& J o Z/ e-~ district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agreement/arrangement has/his not been made to serve this proposal 3) Wef`are)are not able to supply this development with adequate potable water. 4) We arP/are not :able to supply this :e•~~lo~ ~~nt :vith -2(-A! eq- uata ,r or fire flow. S) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other: 6) Water system is/ s not under State Utilities jurisdicticn. 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: inches. 9~ - t3ncc .m 7 in B. to he completed by p;jlican r 1) Individual v: l . capabilitie Comments L 1 ~ j ~-•r,a. ~,a f r_ Social and Health Servl,, es must review the proposal prior to ar : . 1) I/We have reviewed the proposal. It appears to public water. n~~i - r).c.. ZONING RKSHEET continued-3 PART !V - to bl e com^ ed by Spokane County Fire Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District 2) Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Fire flow i0s not adequate for proposed development anr(isfis not required , I in ) be inst all S) Hydrant(s) need to be installer . 6) Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) Nearest fire hydrant is feat 8) Driving distance to nearest fire station is Comments: r _ _igrir`ed ` Date PART V - h1 C1~: ~nf. afnr~ nor S7,c •a- ne C,:,unt'' prrlimina^i C- r:sulLation development plans have been revlewer . I) The proposed provision - and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; 1 :coop • rr- ro-rr,nnt _l is • r Other methods considered were: , r 2) Air quality i`s not a' oncern with this proposal. 3) Ground water qua' ir•s/ r n~- r`-~ r-n 4) Noise is s not a n 11. .v~.': LF,i-r - S) Light KIs not a concern with this Ii ianed n FJ r z County File Sec. R' gtf ~T'ship c25 AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING 0 1 4 1979 STATE OF WASHINGTON ) $P0~(ANc COUNTY } S . S . PLANNING DEPARTNT COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) D b¢i- being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the day of 19 701, I (7. KA-) personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference NOTICE OF ACTION in a conspi- cuous manner on the property, or as directed by she Planning Department, which is the subject of the ACTION, to wit, the following locations: 2. 3. 4. DATED this - day of 19 . SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this day of Noy, bga , 19. Nota u lic in and nor t e State of Washington, residing at Spokane Rev: 4/17/79 ti R E C E I V E MAY z SP K . E COUNTY ,y j - 7,;tl y ;r ti f /I 4 in 1v `-t. i`~ ed PRE-AP - PIACATION FOR ZONE RECIASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY ZjF--1 T&-71? Date: /7` Application No: Name of Applicant. ! PWS hAry,.1j lee- ut6 eEv w. Street Address ,of Applicant: /a City: State: f/J Telephone No. z~ 'Zip Cede: - Existing Zoning C-lassificatibn: ' A a it t- wN a (e Date Existing g Zone Classification Establish-ed:_ Existing Use ,of Property: AC AA Not I IRA Proposed Zone Classification: - Proposed U-se,.of Property,: G.~ ou d6. m t odl (i1"5 Legal Description of Property: 7?A*r d~®~QT?'~sd OF 77AE •e fq OA SEeriegy 9 77 is 4016 X. 4' y A W. W. AES e'ei ArEO As .~=cu®ws - j# -T I% a "aiEOF SA I> CE0770W T,Mfi* 1t.JE: "X7- S fZ 9. 7 FEET' TD Ti/E' WW7- Ava d d&!t 11 t qq Section: Township, Range: Source of Legal: Ce vim- OAW - Assessors Parcel Nurriber: (See Tax, State meat). O .~lS4L/- ~OQ~ 'Property Size: 7. 6`6 ' r ® 1 ile No. ZE-15.8-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE I i~ f FINDINGS AND 0R,DE-R A. INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on November 20, 19794, (being a continuance of the November 15., 1979 hearing:) -and the members of the Committee present being Eldon Thomas,, Chairman, Jane Myers, and' Ted McCoury- and there being the fol,iowing persons present who wish to request. approval. of a Zone. Change; Dennis Shogren for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural to Multiple Family -Suburban for the purpose of condominiums. B. FIN,DIN.GS OF ,FACT 1. That the existing land use in the area is residential, school and undevelop- ed. 2. That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development. 3. That the existing Zoning of the property, described in the application' is Agricultural. 4. That the provisions of Chapter 43.21C RCW (The., State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with. .5. That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have, been fulfilled. 6. That thi's proposal is. not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion. 7. That the band in this; area is suitable for the proposed .condominium use. 8,. That, the proposed condominium' use is compatible with existing uses in the area. 1 -ile No. ZE-158-79 9. That the owners of adjacent lands expressed both approval and disapproval of the proposed land use. 10. The Hearing Examiner Committee does not find the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. 11. The following are additional findings of fact considered by the Hearing Examiner Committee: a) That the multi-family land use is being requested because the proposed use is condominiums which are only allowable within the Two-Family Residential zone (two condominiums) and/or Multi-family (more than two condominiums). C. ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Dennis Shogren for a Zone Reclassification as described in the application should be approved. Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion: 1. Approval is granted for the sole purpose of condominium development as presented by the sponsor, Mr. Shogren. 2. If for any reason this project cannot be constructed, the zoning of the property shall be reverted to the Agricultural zone. 3. That the sponsor in conjunction with the owner of the property record in the Spokane County Auditor's Office prior to a change in the zoning map by staff, a statement to run with the property which is the subject of the zone change application that the zone change is invalid, and the property shall automatically revert to the pre-existing Agricultural zone classification if the property is sold by Mary F. Calistro to another party prior to full development pursuant to the application. L . -ile No. ZE-158-79 r e a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site *is located in Fire District #1. .2. Mains and hydrants need, to be 'installed in the above areas. Access plans for -firefighting .eq'u,ipmeni around the byild,ing shall be approved prior to building permit issuance. 3. Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of water 'i's required for the following zone changes: A water plan is required to 'be submitted prior to any development or use ~of subject bands. b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1. Access permits shall be obtained from 'the Spokane. County Engineer's Office prior to issuance of building permits. 2. An appropriate on-site drainage. disposal system shall be approved by 'the Spokane County Engineer''s Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the ,project. 3. The design, location and arrangement of parking, stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to b : occupied or traveled by automobiles -shal,l be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Purveyor is Irwin Water District #6 and will supply the site with adequate water, for domestic fire and -i' rigation uses. .d) COUNTY H-EALTH DISTRICT 1. No. comments .received. e) SEPA 1. That- th-e provisions of, SEP."A's Notice of Action pursuant to 43-.21'C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be 'completed before any site improvements are made. 3 -Ile No. ZE-158-79 . e 2. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. -Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. f). ZONING 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing' plan for the. described property prior to the release of any, -building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for ma.intenance acceptable to- the.. Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be -submitted with a performance bond for the project prior 'to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally i.n _ accordance._ within, the concept ...presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator wi'II be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans-, and general allowable uses of -the permitted zone. All variations must, conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County, Zoning, Ordinance. The original intent of -the 1 development plans shall be maintained. g) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all, testimony and a review of th'e. staff analys-is adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi- cance and di,`rects the chairman of the committee to sign the final declar,"ation of ,non-significance. 4 =ile No. ZE-1,58-79 s Motion by: Myers Seconded by: McCou ry Vote: Unanimous HEART G EXAMINER MTTEE J Chairman ATTEST: FRED L. 'DAYHARS:H Plan,ning Director By-: 5 t STAFF REPORT Qg D S DATE: May 8, 1980 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-158-79, "CHANGE OF CONDITIONS" 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Mary F. Calistro STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner REQUEST: The applicant is requesting that under "C Order", Condition No. 1, "Approval is granted for the sole purpose of condominium development as presented by the sponsor, Mr. Shogren", be reworded to read: "l. Approval is granted for the sole purpose of condominium development."; and that Conditions 2 and 3 under "C Order" be removed as follows: "2. If for any reason this project cannot be constructed, the zoning of the property shall be reverted to the Agricultural Zone. "3. That the sponsor in conjunction with the owner of the property record in the Spokane County Auditor's Office prior to a change in the Zoning Map by staff, a statement to run with the property which is the subject of the zone change application that the zone change is invalid, and the property shall automatically revert to the pre-existing Agricultural Zone classification if the property is sold by Mary F. Calistro to another party prior to full development pursuant to the application." PROPOSED USE: Condominiums PROJECT LOCATION: On the west side of Pines Road approximately 1,300 feet south of Trent. II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE: Approximately 8.03 Acres. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: Neighborhood is mixed. Trentwood Elementary School is to the north with single family and multi-family uses to the south and undeveloped acres in all directions. LAND USE: Site Undeveloped North Trentwood Elementary School East Cultivated and undeveloped blest Single family and undeveloped South Single family and undeveloped ZONING: North Agricultural, established 1942 East Agricultural, established 1942 Hest Agricultural Suburban, established 1956 South Agricultural and Agricultural Suburban, est. 1942, 1956 • { ZONE REe -.-)SIFICATION NO. ZE-158-79 II. BACKGROUND/ANALYS-IS_ The applicant states. that Mr. Shogren cannot finance the project approved by -the Heari ng' .ExaMiner Committee on November 1'5, 1979. The Committee conditioned the zone reclassification upon development of the site,as,submitted by Mr. Shogren. If Mr. Shogren does not develop the s,ite., the zoning shall revert back -to Agricultural . The Spokane County Health District find's that-: 1. This project lies, over the -Spokane. Aquifer. 2. It is within Critical Water. Supply Service Area No. 3 and within the service area of Irvin Water District. Groundwater resources appear to support devel'opnent at this d,ens,ity. 3. The project is: i ns-i-de the-201 Sewer Stud- Area (Zone 3) ; the Primary Saninary Sewer Area recommended in the '208' Study. The method of sewage disposal i-s subject to approval of the Di rector of Utilities pursuant to County Resolution 80-041`8' adopted March 24, 1980. The topography and soils in the area are generally suitable for use of i-ndividua-l on-site sewage systems. III. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY ENGINEER - 1. No additional Conditions. b.) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1. Water service must be O'ordi'nate_d through, the Director of Utilities, Spokane County. 2. Water service shall be by an existing public water, supply. 3. The us,e o,f individual wells is not authorized. 4. Sewage disposal method shall be as authori=zed by the Director,of Uti 1 itiess, Spokane County. 5. SubJect to disposal method approval by the Director of Utilitiet of Spokane County and subject to specific application approval and issuance of p,erm,its by the Health Officer, the interim use of individual on-site sewage disposal systems may be authorized. 6. The mgner', his heirs and successors, shall agree to not protest legal assessments- an`d utility local improvement districts, to provide central' s°e%gerage service to, this lot. 7. A combined surface water and sewage disposal detai'l'ed plan shall 'be approved by the County E-ngibeer and the Hea'1 th 'Officer prior to the issuance of any building permit for this lot. - 2 - (,contd ) • ZONE Rd 3=S.IFICATION NO. ZE-158-79 III. AGENCI_E5 UNSULTED,/COMMENTS RECEIVED C) ZONING 1. All other cobdi'tions from original approval -shall apply to any future site td'evel opment . Z_. The specific development plan will be submitted for Hea.ring Examiner Committee review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. -3- r VERIFICATION -OF AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) ~p D rG Being first duly sworn., deposes and says: 'That at all tunes mentioned herein he was; and now is, a citizen of The United States, a resident of Spokane County,, Washington, and- over the age of twenty-one years. av That on jorloj94eh 1922, he personally posted three (3) true and correct copies of-the herato attached NOTICE-OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following places in Spokane County., to-wit: 2. - Subscribed and sworn to me A-- 1)0v", zte~ 19fT NOTARY PUBLI, IN AND' FOR SP C UNTY, WASHINGo J Residing at Spokane, Washington i Sp6kame County Plamnfing Department i I CURRENT PLANNING - ~ t _o. 027 8ROAOWAY C-[NTRE BUILO.ING N. 721, JEFFERSON-STREET SPOKANE-, WASHINGT-ON 99260 PHONE 45,6.2205 ;f.:-..+~~^'i -,r ~ jj• ~,•''.c.~i - c-._`} try `rpy~{,~i•.~-- t ~,n~ -•-•~,.i~~ ,~~5'•1'+ s_.~ ' ~i:.. ~ _ - " •t• 2 i~~~.l.. .~>~i 6x7%. 5, ~ _ , , . r• ~ ,1('. • ~ 'ems f'•~1~' ~:L 'S~ T 6r`~``~ ~ . q •~'~~>"Ri'~ ~7. .ci t T' ~~:35•r•-+ •.M=~:.~-r~g~~~~~t > . ~``~~6~1~~Y~S` _ rat ~ ,~~7 ,~',•~ay - , - _ _ ~ 1,. r q - ~e ~~.r r ~•~~.►t .ow l•.L. A►4v?~~".I•~••-~~a~.sMILR~'+wACw•r'~a ~~Y.A1~•~/•N./'•sn~NriL~~I~l~~• > -y . .v...~.~ ~..w - -.....r • 1, l~ao t{p_i ~rt'Y'11 `•f.3 ^T4a '.c:.'~. t- w•' ~p~j,~+~-'_ a~ a `~-'L~°~` t... Y_~ b'-t~- •3zs ~~J. t.l~+Y c . ter. _ Lu~bz~` ,-,+F'Y-_ _ i