The URL can be used to link to this page

ZE-252-79 C/06 _ 46_1v_y A~ -~7.1 ZONE/PUD RECLASSIFICATION CHECKLIST cl Z~. LOLL File # Ze d z f 71 Contact: PART-1 ENGINEER'S SECTION MAP ASSESSOR'S SECTION MAP, (Legal Description, 400 foot boundary outside ownership) ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION, (F or m A) ZONING WORKSHEET ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PLOT PLANS (5) SIGN PLAN LANDSCAPE PLANS (5) GRAPHICS PACKET L SLIDES (minimum size film 126) Z C `~,7' 77 (date) APPLICATION FILING FEE (s) RECEIPT NUMBER 3 S~ Z ZZC TITLE REPORT OF PROPERTY OWNERS (date) COUNTY AGENCIES NOTIFIED NOTICE OF HEARING FORM (AGENDA) TYPED, (date) ORIGINAL GIVEN APPLICANT (date STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST STAFF ANALYSIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING (A Sign - 4x4) (date) AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING SIGNED MAIL AGENDA TO CONCERNED AGENCIES (date) (dat(e) - ANALYSIS MAILED TO APPLICANT (date) PART ITT HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE'S ACTION: APPROVED DENIED CONTINUED MINUTES -MAILED TO APPLICANT ( r SEPA's Notice of Action BONDING (Landscape) ACCEPTED RETURNEE- (da te) HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION NO: Z- 2 ~2 y (Check one) I would like to be on record in FAVOR OPPOSITION NEUTRAL Doiyou wish to TESTIFY at this Hearing? YES NO YOUR NAME: (please print Address: l'p q V ~i~~ !'S form 31illll, :~pr, 1`). b - ~ CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES ~ ~ , Gu,m ~ r OPTIONAL Sf.RYICES ~ m ~ c ~ x' ~ Af1URN flfCEIPT SERYIGE m ~ ~ m ~ h ~ ~ c ~ ~ t( ° s pin ~'i a~ ~ vt o Co c,n ~o J ~ P p nm~ mm~ m~~ of h ~ m ~ C7 r pti ~ yno ?~a ego ro Ali m m ~ ~ ~m om 1 c ~ ~ RBI o00 Asa cno Lp m < D• cD ZC ~ "'~1 m i3 03~ v; r p ~m < nm `b~ N ~~°n! na °n! z m ~ ~ S~ ~ 3 0 ?M CD w I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ro ' I ~ ~ ~ I ~ A A R A R p p r I'ti I'o1m 31ti11{), ry111. I°1.(e PS Form 3811(1, r~lar. 197ti ~ - _ - 7J ~ ~ ~ m ro ~ CONSULT POSTMA5IEA FDR FEES ~ ~ ~ ~ R1 CONSULT POSTMASTER FDA FEES o r ° _ u~ ~ Q ~ Z ~ ~ ~ OPTIONAL SERVICES .n p ~ ~ A OPTIONAL SERVICES ~ ~ X11 ~ m z - ~ a ~ ~ c, o p~ m ~ r„ ~~~r1 ~R ox ~ ~ x~ ~ RETUANRECEIPTSERVICE ' ~ ~ ~ m ~m ~ '1f7 m a RETURN AfCEIPT SERVICE m y r rni~l 1~ T~ ~ 0 0~ m m rn ~ ? ~ ~ T ~ Q ~ I N 1R D' axes ^n V, OD'n ^'A yj' l7 d a a*cn ou- ,on :a~: -i~ O' Rt O~ m d mcis ~r+ix~ rn2s `ai ~ t7 ~ ~ ~ p mCS+i mr~2 r,z?' L'2 p C7 ` ~ ~}A ~ Q RI ~'9o r'o r"oo mo I - D ~ ~ ' ~ (17.2 ~ u~coV Ce roc '~a D T s:A,Z ~ - 5 cc~ <n~ ~ r} m t, rn f r';~, r D j s70~I r<nr£r,~ m~f o~ ~ d m (4 Zm ~ .p Z ~vma~ rya m°O~ ~ 4 m ;,I I 2m . C ~ to -1 a m •,t'D ~ 111 ~ va o ~ m © ~ o r cJ rn 111 ti Z ~'wo -j'~,,ni .goo ro Yn m m ~ O mad a$ "`f ~s O r -:;IN ~ ~n D Mag m" ~ bl r I :I7 Ap / ~ ago ~a cNn~ ~ < ~v,l ~ Z~ ~i~ ~ L7 -n= ~c laf'I~ i, ~p Z~ ~ ~rn~ 4~ r m r*rn, C 7pm ~~..GU 7 ~ ~ ~m~ ~ ro Amy m I `c~ ~ r~t.,~J`~' <d ~ p c ~ m J ~~7 ~ c a~ ~ cn ~ a ~ ~ r~ C~: ~r, ~ ~ ~ rn y r~ 2 a z to to O` p~ ~ I-~ a~~I u;c~7 ~ ~ Iii ~ ,'D Zm ~/6 ~ ~,AJ ~ -~c~;,;I „ ° j ~nm ~ r~ 1~~,~iiY1lk~ I ~ x i~ ~p ~ 111 ~ ,~n''---'~``,, I`fl ~ D~ © If1 o p .p h 11th r 1L ~ I~ r"'") I I I I~ u D_ I ~ ~ ^ ~ A fl A I A A A A A A ~ A A A A . 1 - - PS Form 3RU(1, Air. 1976 ~ PS Form 38Q11, .~1pr. 1916 _ - i " m " CONSUIT POSTMASTER FOR FEES ~ ~ 8~ o CONSULT POSTMASTER FUR FEES I ~ ~ ~ m ~ I ~ o ~n ; ~ m a ~ ' 1 D OPIIDNAL SEAYICES ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ o ~ ; ~ OPTIONAL SEAYICES ~ ~ o m ,L► r _ a ~ - ~ m , ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ RETURN RECEIPT SERYIGE ~ to I ~ + (,t, • ~ z ~ N RETURN RECEIPT SERVICE I ~ ~ T . ~ 1' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ i I ~ m ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 N, In Fyy ~y Q D s vo out e~U m I A ~ ~ A v ~ un n.r +n 1 C3 ~ ~ I ~i d ~'+ly~s rlai»ts r~zs b2 D d °~y 31 rn~S ~Ri2 ~'2 AS ~p Q i~ '1 38a ~ i m l1i9~7 rrCl r4G C D ~J v,oa~ fro F~on -+o D T ~ U7 Z ~ ~ E<g 4n! c~~ r U7~Z O i O m -'A~ <c~ ~a~ "tf ~ r ~ nr N Zf7 ~ ~ a Au ~ ~"^5~ "'o-, ~ rn !D ZC'1 a rr•t mn ~ Mor v ~i n ax b ~ fl m ' m ~ yea pm~ A'a ~n m m~ m " mm r~ r `v. m O mGa Ana ~Aa _~.t mi ~ d mn r7 i C•i v G ~ • 4 t ~ t] „ c rt c I ~ 77 I r J] ~D I / • ~ mod ~o~ m~ F d z ~ ~1 v.S ms pV - ~ ~ o ~ ~~x go N4 ~4 ~ e 0 c0 ZC ~ ~ r ~ ~ir~~ Qo mo rnI m I a ~ ~ 4~ i m o ~ m m < ~m m \J fir.. 2~ T~s o~ r, ~ m m . •i 1 1 ~ ~ D ut o I n v ~ N ~ G7 J ~ <~c miu'' o r~r ° D 'A t !D 2 G7 ~.('+1 1 ' < { rn 9 ❑ m < " ]k m '-7 ~,.1 ~ D F' b 1 n m n /y ~ r ~1 t ~ ~ © DC m ~ ' I. w I w [n V r~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ ( fl p ~ ~ A A F A A A A ~ ,i c. a I^ i 1 i',S I~,~rist 1Rfilil, ;~~r. 19;[, - - ~ 4'S I~a}rn~ 3h1}{), :'\Fr. ➢t)7t; - 73 ~ " CDNSUIT POSTMASTER FOR FEES ' J (,,1`j' ~ 171 ~ o m a~ o ~ ~ CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES ~ , ~ ~al r OPTIONAL SERVICES ~ p ~ ;',_•s o m_y+ r OPTIONAL SERVICES ~ ~ 'in ~ o ~"n ' ~ ~ RETURN RECEIPT SERVICE II m m ~ n 1 '"ti ~ u~i ~ "G ~ C arn(au a~r.~t€rt RFAUICF I r~ ~ ~ ~ =-war.: ~ ~ ~ ° z ~ p~I rrnn m .,mac ;t~ (A , m ~ m r `mac -rg A 7Mp ~ j °rFS e~p~ ppr -I n _c~~° T a y m rn m >q?! "y 47 m0= mZ rYt z DS ~n n 0 ~p/'~, mrtt r9iz ns i v p Sao r ra roo -1° A m _k ~Z* c g C) r (q .2 0 fn Woo a° ° A ~1 Y 1 f~ ~Z A !a Gm~ M (D ZC9 Q yA ty f7 r m i) ZC] 0 z° ~z x❑ m m y a m -fm a mm ~ ~Lo <m0 r° fn ~cn zap m + f7 rn 1y -+m ~i i d m o m, m ~~W m{y ~l J 4 m° ° m' C'{ Q r (7 m ° ff i gym= gs Lnz m= a 4 = mnz Ts O { ZO L, m ~O i m° m m zC n m Wool a Nc °a m ff~ C n m 7- r ° OK I; f1 Y IT1 m --,j i m m -ti m fit i• `ti3 < ~ N (D -I M. r. -M m Sr Ii = °3 a r cA t m M ,~`~'4' mmn mil a 2 { a ,t 471 9D p < m lyl y~ moo, ° m 90 ro z[flS r~+Yty Dy m. 3 m = `r Dm Tpy t fi r~ r~ ~/y (fit 1` r ~p p r -tv ° m m I G 1.1J f~ m' 3° L~ N Ds m CCU CpW m n~ rp q i s w rp LO A A ft A A = Fi ft et ~"4i/t " ~ _ • ; ~ ~ ltd Ct.AIM CHICK NO. .1tl.f ~ij f u 'ECTS OHOLV PINES O ''ASH. PATE O Mr. L. Larson t • East 12204 Mission ,J^ Spokane, Washington 99206 IST NOTICE ~ 1 2ND NOTICE co Rit V fIN C f DatMwd + PS Fwm 36, FM tY/S 28 DEC 'r S loom / O 7 A 'lYti~7 Y13J l'~',~•lk~J'f~ ARCHITECTS NORTH 909 PINES SPOKANE, WASH. A. Payne 99206 North 1503 Pines Road Spokane, Washington 99206 y ' 1 ► j F. _ X1.1 ~C` r ALM I PLANNING DEPARTMENT .3, BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET i PHONE 456-2205 vim".' {-~C SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 CURRENT PLANNING MEMORANDUM TO: 1. Department of Ecology 2. Social & Health Services 3. Health District 4. Department of Transportation 5. SCAPCA 6. Mr. Ray Card, 208 Coordinator 7. KREM TV 2 8. Audubon Society 9. Modern Electric Water Company 10. City of fli l l wood FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-2205 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: GRANT GROESBECK ZE-252-79 This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-220. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to be either an interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on December 26, 1979. Please respond, if appropriate, on or before January 9, 1980. The subject proposal or action IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY 1208' STUDY. Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be prepared. A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for January 10, 1980, to be held in Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. Enclosures Revised 12/1/79 • I ~ AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON, u COUNTY OF SPOKANE, .........U :..C_•...... ~ NCH being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the 10.11OB.................................. NOTICE OF ACTION BY of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekly newspaper. That said news- THE SPOKANE COUNTY NEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE paper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to. published 43.210 RCW, notice is hereby given that in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County. c rnmittee d doontyy Janua y 10, 1900 Examiner Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office An maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which the Any actstion to described below. enjoin, review ac or otherwise challenge such action on said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Su- the is onsof Chapter 43 21C R CW with (State perior Court of the State of Washington in and for Spokane County. That the Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on march 6, i9so or be barred. The action taken by the Spokane annexed is a true copy of a No_7Uee...Of...jLa: _on County Hearing Examiner Committee, notice of which is hereby given, was as follows (1) Approved Action: Zone ° reclassification from agricultural to as it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form), of said residential office (2) Description: zone reclassification Of 3.7 Residential rOfficeom Agricultural to newspaper once each week for a period of .........consecutive (3) Such action pertained to property commonly known as and-or described as: Located on the northwest corner of Pines Rd. and Mission Ave. weeks, commencing on the...... th...day of........... _ 1&uua3: 5 r 19__8-0.. (4) Pertinent documents may be examined during normal county ~pn~. business hours at the S kane County Planning Department. N721 Jeffersa, and ending on the....... 611......... day of........... _...Fa1=11amy 19-2Z. Street, 5Spokane, 09) 45456- .2205Washington 99260. Phone: (5091 both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to . Notice Given By Grant Groesbeck its subscribers during of said riod. Filed By: Grant Groesbeck. Owner 1-30--2.6 Subscri a sworn to before me this :th....... clay of ..s✓l y . 19 'ot:1iY Public in and for the State of ashington, Residing at: Spokane, WA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF WASHINGTON, a • COUNTY OF SPOKANE, L --J being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that he is the MITU$.................................. of the SPOKANE VALLEY HERALD, a weekly newspaper. That said news- NOTICE OF ACTION BY paper is a legal newspaper and it is now and has been for more than six HESPOKANECOUNTY months prior to the date of the publication hereinafter referred to, published HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter in the English language continually as a weekly newspaper in Spokane County. the Spokane Raw, notice is hereby iven roar Washington, and it is now and during all of said time was printed in an office the mid on1ya Hearing 1,~i990 tla a maintained at the aforesaid place of publication of said newspaper, which the action described below. Any action to set aside, enioin. review said newspaper has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Su- or otherwise challenge such action on perior Court of the State of Washington in and for Spokane County. That the the grounds of noncompliance with the prOVisionsof Chapter 43.21C RCW (Stare Environmental Policy Act) shall be commenced on march 6. 1980 or be barred. annexed is a true copy of a . The action taken by the Spokane County Hearing Examiner Committee, notice of which is hereby given, was as follows. (t) Approved Action: Zone ,is it was published in regular issues (and not in supplement form), of said reUassrfication from agricultural to residential office (2) Description lone reclassification ~,,1. . of 17 acres from Agricultural to newspaper once each week for a period of ...consecutive Residential Office (3) Such action pertained to property commonly known as and-or est corner of described es: Located on the northwes weeks, commencing on the .....3 h•..day of........... .J"1 19..$4. Pines Rd. and Mission Ave. (4) Pertinent documents may be examined during normal county business hours at the Spokane county and ending on the i$t......... day Of. _-.-?WWU1Lrr7 Planning Department, 721 Jefferson both dates inclusive, and that such newspaper was regularly distributed to street, (spo ) ken~e_T~ ashington 94260. its subscribers durin 1 of said rind. -.AZ Notice Given By: Grant Groesbeck ,r e Filed By GraGroesbeck, Owner 1-30-2.6 Subscri d sworn ore me this _ day of flab 19-80 Nota Public in- and for t ie State of Wa rngton, Residing at: Spokane, W A . 1fF• att. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF ECOLOGY W--hmot()n 08541 '06 75,~ ?90 Dixy Lee Ray Governor TO: FROM: J° ~C( /1 C The Washington State Department of Ecology headquarters office (Olympia) has received and recorded the following "Notice of Action Taken" pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080. This notice is now on file and available for review upon request. IMAIn Acting agency: Type of action taken: I J Proj ect Date received: DOE f i l e number: NAT-( r; This letter indicates only filing of the notice of action with the Department of Ecology. It does not indicate concurrence with the format or contents of the notice, or compliance with all provisions of RCW 43.21C.080. If you have any questions, please contact the Environmental Review Sect'jlo . (206) 753-6892. ECY 010-4-50 Rev. 6/78 County File # Sec. R' 5,Aj T'sh'p qV rwm - NOTICE OF ACTION BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ~ilege,,,o ~~.Q,,,,h~,~, eaM,•t,ec PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE SPOKANE COUNTY DID ON /zjCzy4 TAKE THE ACTION DESCRIBED BELOW. ANY ACTION TO SET ASIDE, ENJOIN, REVIEW OR OTHERWISE CHALLENGE SUCH ACTION ON THE GROUNDS OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRO- VISIONS OF CHAPTER 43.21C RCW. (STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT) SHALL BE COMMENCED ON _ 31 /,WQ (30 days from date of 2nd news- paper publication)- OR BE BARRED. THE ACTION TAKEN BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY ~v G•tGn~.nc.~e oM,qwc~ NOTICE OF WHICH IS HEREBY GIVEN, WAS AS FOLLOWS: (1) APPROVED ACTION: ~o~e iQ,cC ~Q~ -F! ~i'e -~'Ro AwlAo-WWb eS- (2) DESCRIPTION: gdAe-S ~o 'fo ~ - O ~ ECG (3) SUCH ACTION PERTAINED TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS AND/OR DESCRIBED AS (street address per general location) : 40C4~<d qzq Mi_ssf'0~_ ye (4) PERTINENT DOCUMENTS MAY BE EXAMINED DURING NORMAL COUNTY BUSINESS HOURS AT THE SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT, N. 721 JEFFERSON STREET, SPOKANE, WASHINGTON, 99260 PHONE: (509) 456-2205 NOTICE GIVEN BY: aAg44 40VISLeft'k. FILED BY: NAME: CAQ444 dA0e'5&_A-k TITLE: 61WAZe SIGNATURE e,/o ?ICan s anWt u'eq -7K SPo~q~c k14 91W4 Revised 4/17/79 County F1 1i ZE - GA&ASec. i. 8e 04M T' s h i p AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) S.S. COUNTY OF SPOKANE being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says; That I am a citizen of the United States of America, and a resident resident of the State of Washington over the age of 18 years. That on the day of ` , 19I personally posted one (1) or more true and correct copies of the hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference ~40TICE OF ACTION in a conspi- cuous manner on the property, or as directed by the Planning Department, which is the subject of the ACTION, to wit, the folloc.inkg locations: 1 . f~C~2-THW~S'T csz~~N~- o~ fllliSSiON I~V~ g pt►.~ES 2. 3. 4. DATED this S~ day of V , 19 SUBSCRIBLD arld S'iORN to before me this o~ 19 -A J' -LAI Notarv ub is in and for the State of Washin on, residing at Spok.ine : i, ile No ZE-252-79 SPOKANE COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FINDINGS AND ORDER A INTRODUCTION This matter having come before the Examiner Committee on January 10, 1980, and the members of the Committee present being John Culler, Chairman, Kenneth Kennedy and Paul Sceva, Jr , and there being the following persons present who wish to request approval of a Zone Change, Grant Groesbeck, applicant, for a Zone Reclassification, Agricultural to Residential Office for the purpose of an office building B FINDINGS OF FACT 1 That the existing land use in the area is residential, freeway, church, and Valley Ambulance Company 2 That the Comprehensive Plan designates this area as appropriate for residential development 3 That the existing zoning of the property described in the application is Agricultural 4 That the provisions of RCW 43 21C (The State Environmental Policy Act) have been complied with 5 That the proper legal requirements for advertisement of the Agenda Item have been fulfilled 6 That this proposal is not in conflict with the provisions of adopted regula- tion 7 That the land in this area is suitable for the proposed use, or uses within the proposed Zone Classification 8 That the proposed use is compatible with existing uses in the area 1 ile No ZE-252-79 9 That the owners of adjacent lands expressed neither approval nor dis- approval of the proposed use 10 The Hearing Examiner Committee finds the proposed use to be in harmony with the general purpose and will not be otherwise detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare C ORDER The Hearing Examiner Committee, pursuant to the aforementioned, finds that the application of Grant Groesbeck for a zone reclassification as described in the application should be approved Special conditions or contingencies applied to motion 1 All traveled roadways and parking areas for this proposal be paved a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 Mains and hydrants need to be installed b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1 Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Mission Avenue and Pines Road 2 Access to Pines Road to be prohibited at this time 3 Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Mission Road and Pines Road 4 Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project 2 ile No ZE-252-79 5 The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving c) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 Depending upon sewage flow design this project may require DSHS approval and disposal of effluent in non-paved areas e) SEPA 1 That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43 21C 080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made f) ZONING 1 Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits 2 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Administrator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits 3 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes 3 ile No ZE-252-79 Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted gone All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained 4 The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant There- fore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee g) 208 1 This proposal recommends ground infection of untreated stormwater runoff 2 This proposal includes too little or no open space to accommodate use of grassed percolation areas for stormwater runoff disposal 3 This proposal does not mention the Recommended Action of double plumbing and stub-outs to the appropriate property line 4 This proposal should submit, for approval, storage, spill control, drainage, fire prevention, and cleanup plans h) That the Hearing Examiner Committee after hearing all testimony and a review of the staff analysis adopts the proposed declaration of non-signifi- cance and directs the chairman of the committee to sign the final declaration of non-significance Motion by Kennedy Seconded by Sceva, Jr Vote Unanimous 4 ile No ZE-252-79 HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE airman J r ATTEST f FRED L DAYHARSH Planning Director By 5 L t ~~1 v W I VV • , n o-ARL+SLF •~b ► O 1% Q L 10 W I E~252~79 out -1 v- EL 1969 r GO C 4p J 9G ~ r tN O We t Z 6 C a 0 4 2" 4 I M I S S i o N A\ L e ~ A X w E x ; 1 8 , 966 AV r 0 O a M NEL LE SANTO I T IMT O Q sm" W 3 80 OW E J + M r OESMEIT DES M ET Av E Y - ATAL O CATAL00 - L.n 0 3 d ac A*Am.&Aww or LU Dla s ~ ?Q oil, ~ en ar > a, Al B AY M.Alli- 11; 'MEN 16 ,III v 9 EL 2 W Pine v>A,or b - -1 a w ALK 1 H~yhSc~sol d ~ A K I Av y qLS~ J .W& do 'A ~iv♦ AvI ~ K ALLEY WAY VA LL-FY W J p I X9N Z tr MoiH O O AIM D d E '5 1 -4mum iOC d L ` FU rOE s s. s°s as _ AIVER510E " r 'AEL /993 EL 99 ~ SPRAGUE ,/►Vlr. Vq 2 312f i • PCST «I CE r- I-- j AVZ CA '01 L/POAO = _ - - --r- ~ _ 000 - rd f O R O ~ ~ ' ' ~ ~ • ca OUR TM AV ! '"H 4TM AVE Y Q t J r ° s g+ x T M 3 Six vE AvLT~ bN _ T T fm • - V+ 1 ~ 4L ST_ REPORT DATE JANUARY 10, 1980 TO HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER ZE-252-79 I GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT Grant Groesbeck STATUS OF APPLICANT Owner REQUESTED ZONING Residential Office EXISTING ZONING Agriculture, established, 1942 PROPOSED USE Office building PROJECT LOCATION Generally located at the northwest corner of Pines Road and Mission Avenue II SITE PLAN INFORMATION SITE SIZE Approximately 3 7 acres SITE CHARACTERISTICS The site is fairly flat, slopes down towards the freeway on the north side, contains several structures and trees NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER The neighborhood is primarily residential to the west and south and office/commercial use to the east The site is adjacent to 1-90 on the north LAND USE Site 3 vacant homes, one being demolished, one duplex, undeveloped North 1-90 right-of-way East Church West Single family homes South Valley ambulance, single family homes ZON I NG North Agricultural, established, 1942 East Agricultural, established, 1942 West Agricultural, established, 1942 South Agricultural Suburban, established, 1955 a ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER ZE-252-79 If SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION Residential NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS 5 (to be removed) NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED 1 Total Square Feet Unknown PARKING REQUIRED Office - 1 400 III BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On May 20, 1977, the Planning Commission approved a zone reclassification from Agricultural to Residential Office for a portion of this site The reclassification was never finalized IV AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1 The site is located in Fire District #1 2 No comments received b) COUNTY ENGINEER 1 Applicant shall dedicate a 20 foot radius on Mission Avenue and Pines Road 2 Access to Pines Road to be prohibited at this time 3 Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Mission Road and Pines Road 4 Appropriate on and off-site drainage and access plans shall be approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project 5 The design, location and arrangement of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving i c) WATER PURVEYOR 1 Purveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses d) COUNTY HEALTH DISTRICT 1 Depending upon sewage flow design this project may require DSHS approval and disposal of effluent in non-paved areas L ZONE RECLASSIFICATIOI UMBER ZE-252-79 IV AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) e) SEPA 1 That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43 21C 080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made f) ZONING 1 Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits 2 A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Adminis- trator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits 3 The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes Building location, landscape plans, and general allowable uses of the permitted gone All variations must conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoning Ordinance The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained 4 The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant i Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee /7 0' •3'0'x. - 47 AGLNLV Mks! (1NbIL ~Ukpl QA l lr Tu eye 'Mir W/ Lea z9 e- tMull Numa. e P- 11t1a s r r~ Aba.ats- y , i builab(. r I a..wJ Age.uLy . ANNI itdrrt ra did OX 1 tu~a.a.t ~ S5'/ d s7 1 HAAVk JJLV 1 LWho tilt f ANU= 1Ruv.t:N,. 1 i+~t, Prop -!'la.►1'I~a~c* of Nigait. air M1~ $ioRLt.. VSiS - lkls WA I Lk QUAL 11 Y A -K&V I&W tar APProvaL Required 5&1►t IL tnuk W/17.500 4.1'.D, or S4 or more vervicas H" Irwnt«rl tlyrtd. or laijuoa W/3$00 G P.D. ur l~l or mura CUUML."Idt air itiduertrirl facilitye a►Ltvi.&... NPIJLS NurWl t rvqui rad ,tdta Ncrwlt rayulrad k 1 % N" aNat.st iult Itdillucdtbd 4 - J-W I o Pr.slraa.st ion buyuougoo I' U LIty I F4110M441td i LlraiIL I lac StAquestad _WO & c s QU" I l e y y t a;alesi .l d Mud 1144Ot lua 1ldqu i lrod Apla1 le-a c lu be Motif lad No (~~uuus.~rt ..f~ ~T •~irr ~ r ll _ _ _.Ir~t d [ 1 s.J (.►IswG.&rt d At tac h%W Alit QUALI IV ( Irk Luisirt Iat& ur JIM I#Ad14.tiun) A __Ni,t I. &p „i t •,i~trrr~.t I~.r~ ltuyutrud 11 _ _ 11661 t1 lifs l l ru 11 llasy~r I t u~l L _ _ lla, t , ( I uJ i almnsuut a At t ~r. Ir~..V a0l it h0Uk( L (I 18A 116-..Idrr.lt futr) A ._I'ru 44 t W I t 11111 Ayu l l.. rc ~It~a~.ltac~la Zone) tl ILPA Ik.rv 1 L.W Alsisc r(rn Nua vrddry t _ Vru i&, t WI L1111% Strauart 1uW lulls 5TATp STATE OF DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION _ x WASHINGTON Office of District Administrator n Dixy North 2714 Mayfair Street G ~x~ °y overnmor Ray Box 5299 North Central Station Gov Spokane Washington 99205 January 4, 1980 Ms Marcia Raines Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Street Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Ms Raines We have reviewed the Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Committee Agenda for January 10, 1980, and have the following comments Zone Reclassification #ZE-252-79 We would request that as a condition of approval that a 30 foot setback be required to allow for future expansion of SR 27 (Pines Road) in this area Also, left turns on or off of SR 27 (Pines Road) north of Mission Avenue may be restricted in the future Zone Reclassification #ZW-172-79 All access to the proposed property must be made thru the County Road System with no new access points onto SR 902 (Medical Lake Road) We would also like to review the proposed access to evaluate the im- pact on the SR 90 - SR 902 Interchange ery truly yours, 7~ ALTE HORNING, P E District Administrator WRH ib DW cc Walther w/attach McBride w/attach Earnest Record Control, Hdqrs u 3 r FIRE MARSHALS OFFICE N 811 Jefferson 'r z 456-5786 SPOKANE WASHINGTON x 99260 .r O d~ S December 27, 1979 SPOKANE COUNTY COURF OUSE TO FRED DAYHARSH PLANNING DIRECTOR FROM LLOYD DYKES FIRE MARSHAL RE ZONE RECLASSIFICATIONS FOR JANUARY 10, 1980 Adequate water for fire protection and distribution of such water shall be required and approved water plan is required prior to any land development The above requirements shall apply to the following ZN-134-799 ZE-177-79 ZE-252-79✓ ZW-172-79 ZE-232-79 ZE-242-79 ZE-257-79 LD/ba J 4N Sp ~ 198 p1qN~ D ,NC ~EC~~NTY P,~RrME Nr .e.w . dr r 5poi~ANC VALLtq FIRt DtPART111tNT C!7 - R eArr9rrtjD 0 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99206 0 TELEPHONE (509) 928-1700 JqIV 81980 RAC 7~~ January 3, 1980 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Marcia Raines Zoning Administrator Spokane County Planning Commission Second Floor Broadway Centre Building N721 Jefferson ` Spokane, Washington 09,260 r Dear Ms Raines The following Zonet Uclassifications have been reviewed for fire protection" ZE-177-79 B & K Partnership ZE-252-79 Grdelgbecw" ~ A# OnveiiF AZ-172-79 C 1ntsa ZE-232-79 £~#-Ms ZE-242-79, SUIivAn Gkoul y ZE-257-79 :_H11114tealf,~ Rota westment$- Mains and hyd ante, heed to 'do, installed iA Ais area Access plans for firefighting equipment arouncl the buildizig shAll 1 p"Ved ptftr i toybuilding permit i8suance S , e 4 Lt of Iftml` AC sn PREVENT FIRES SAVE LIVES i C AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY POUNE G MTY SID January 2, 1980 3'e* pNE ~4uR ME~~ Sp0 ~Ep A p`pNN Fred Dayharsh Spokane County Planning Dept North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 Dear Fred This letter is in regards to severaoposed zone changes with file numbers ZE-242-79, ZE-252-79, ZW-172-79, ZE-177-79, ZE-257-79 These proposals will all have on-site traffic,which means there is a potential for fugitive dust problems if the areas remain unpaved For this reason, I recommend that all traveled roadways and parking areas for these proposals be paved Thank you for inviting us to comment on these projects Sincerely, SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY 11442~4N Wi111am T Zorphy`oe Air Quality Engineer L ADDRESS REPLY TO SPOKANE COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL AUTHORITY WEST 1101 COLLEGE ROOM 230 SPOKANE WASHINGTON 99201 z "4N '~~FI1 "C ' ''.llfy'~ PLANNING DEPARTMENT .+rL•,4~,~ 'r.u.^~'',.` r... BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFFERSON STREET c li~~~. r• PHONE 456-2205 JEA SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 99260 5?pKANL COU.',,Y COURT HC'USE File # ZE-252-79 Section 9 Township 25 Range 44 Classification: Agricultural to Residential Office Application Title: Grant Groesbeck, 3.7 acres T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N % ROPOSED NqON-SIGNIFICANCE DECLARATION OF INAL SIGNIFICANCE 1 - Description of Proposal: Professional Office Building, current site plan will be subject to change. 2. Proponent: Grant Groesbeck 3. Contact Person: TransAmerica Title/John Stoeser Phone: 922-2222 4. County Action Requested: Zone Reclassification 5. Location of Proposal: Northwest corner of Pines and Mission with access from Mission Avenue. 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environ- mental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declara Name: Fred L. Dayharsh Name: Chai n Signature: Signature: Title: Director Title: Ch irma Dept: Spokane County Planning Dept. Dept: Hea • Examiner Committee Date: December 26, 1979 Date: January 10, 1980 0 Revised 12/1/79 The O® 0 i6lathdre w ,e ti Newman I Like y 1 Hayden Lake •4%,'' 1 Ifoeur t~ j Alone " e Lake r%' libert r Coeur Lakt ( d'Alene Spokane Aquifer Study N $11 leilerstt Spokane, Washington 96261 (509)456-3600 APPLICANT ,rAt.~~ r r 5~ _ 7 LEAD AGENCY if.i:z 02,1 COMIENT DUE DATE 4 Comments on Proposed Action In order to facilitate our review of projects for their conformity with the 1208' Recommended Actions we have developed the following checklist The ' ch,\ecklipt is based on problem areas addressed in the Water Quality Management Plan. ' This proposal includes an aquifer penetration which does not conform to ❑ Recommended Actions. This proposal includes activities which may generate solid waste or sludge ❑ which could pose a disposal problem. I The proposed solid waste/sludge disposal methods are inconsistent with the ❑ Recommended Actions 2 ge-T-'his proposal recommends ground injection of untreated stormwater runoff. d his proposal includes too little or no open space to accommodate use of grassed percolation areas for stormwater runoff disposal This proposal includes activities which may result in spills of critical ❑ materials in the course of storage and handling Spill prevention and clean up measures do not conform with Recommended Actions. This proposal may require the transport of critical materials Precautions ❑ which conform to the Recommended Actions need to be taken ❑ This proposal provides for disposal of sanitary waste using methods inconsistent with the Recommended Actions Comments on Proposed Actions coat -2- ❑ This proposal provides for a type or density of development inconsistent with the Recommended Actions for the location indicated. This proposal is not consistent with the Recommended Action of encouraging ❑ f 1-in development. This proposal does not mention the Recommended Action of double plumbing and stub-outs to the appropriate property line This proposal does not mention the Recommended Action requiring covenants ❑ or deed restrictions for grading, drainage or site plans ❑ This proposal should be located outside the Aquifer Sensitive Area This proposal should submit, for approval, storage, spill control, drainage, fire prevention, and cleanup plans. This proposal should include leak prevention and/or detection provisons ❑ including impervious containment provisions ❑ This proposal may use chemicals that need special containment provisions. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 77 3 ~ !*~°="_y BROADWAY CENTRE BUILDING N 721 JEFrER- SON 51R~ET zs °;Tt~ > 3~ r PHONE 455-22015 SPOKANE C0UMTY C0LRT Fi0US- IJ K-E N! 1 P of_. J~ N 11,1 N MEMORANDUM TO: 1. Department of Ecology 2. Social & Health Services 3. Health District 4. Departrrient of Transportation 5. SCAPCA 6. V rV11 lay Card, L08 Coordinator 7. K R EM TV 2 8. Audubon Society 9. Modern Electric Water Company -I0. City of 1.11 1 Twecjc:l FROM: Spokane County Planning Department North 721 Jefferson Spokane, WA 99260 (509) 456-22+05 Attention: Marcia Raines REFERENCE: Lead Agency Designation, Threshold Determination, Staff Review, Environmental Checklist, map; all or some of which are attached. Pursuant to WAC 197-10-203, the Spokane County Planning Department, a division of Spokane County, has determined that the County, as an ACTING AGENCY, is the LEAD AGENCY for the following project: GRANT QUESBECK ZE-252-79 This determination was made in accordance with WAC 197-10-224. Information on file concerning this proposed action indicates you or your agency to be either an interested party or an AGENCY WITH JURISDICTION (WAC 197-10-040 (4) or an AGENCY WITH EXPERTISE (WAC 197-10-040 (3)). Accordingly, if you wish to exercise your option to review and comment as provided in WAC 197-10-340 (5), a proposed Declaration of Nonsignificance was issued on December 26, 1979. Please respond, if appropriate, on or before January 9, 1980. The subject proposal or action IS LOCATED WITHIN THE DESIGNATED SPOKANE VALLEY SOLE SOURCE AQUIFER AND AQUIFER SENSITIVE AREA AS DESIGNATED BY THE SPOKANE COUNTY `2081 STUDY, Please advise us as soon as possible as to whether you feel an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be prepared. A public hearing has been tentatively scheduled for January 10, 1980, to be held in Broadway Centre Building, Second Floor Hearing Room, North 721 Jefferson, Spokane, Washington. Enclosures Revised 121'1/79 PLANNING DEPARTF.IENT y a~ 6f 9 PHONE 456-2205 SPOKANE, WASHINGTON 9926( SPOKANE COUNTY COURT HOUSE File # ZE-252-79 Section 9 Township 25 Range 44 Classification: Agricultural to Residential Office Application Title: Grant Groesbeck, 3.7 acres T H R E S H O L D D E T E R M I N A T I O N ROPOSED I,M'ON-SIGNIFICANCE DECLARATION OF FINAL SIGNIFICANCE 1. Description of Proposal: Professional Office Building, current site plan will be subject to change. 2. Proponent: Grant Groesbeck 3. Contact Person: TransAmerica Title/John Stoeser Phone: 922-2222 4. County Action Requested: Zone Reclassification 5. Location of Proposal: Northwest corner of Pines and Mission with access from Mission Avenue. 6. Lead Agency: SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON This proposal has been determined to not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. An EIS is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) (c). This decision was made after review by the County of a completed environ- mental checklist and other information on file with the Lead Agency. 7. Responsible Official: Proposed Declaration: Final Declaration: Name: Fred L. Dayharsh Name: Chairman Signature: Signature: Title: Director Title: Chairman Dept: Spokane County Planning Dept. Dept: Hearing Examiner Committee Date: December 26, 1979 Date: January 10, 1980 Revised 12/1/79 • ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File N ZE-252-79 $""one cou.n M".T "use Sec-Twp-Rng 9- 2 5 - 44 Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governments agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely", as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts,will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be award of and conger themselves with the d ree of impact, asking you for mart information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be helpful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional a , if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware an which are relevant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will-be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. Late law r uir explanations for every s" and "mavb " answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may required to provide explanation or no' answers, a in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, gust answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Grant Groesbeck Phone Number 926-9555 2. Address of Proponent: N. 909 Pines Road Spokane, Wa 99206 3. Date Checklist Submitted: November 26, 1979 4, Agency Requiring Checklist:_ Spokane County Planning 5. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: N/A 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): Sge attached 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any oth r information neeled,to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal):, The proposal is situated on UhP enorthwe t cornei E f J1nes and Mission with aess 4rom.Mis$ic'I re a v eve ,.wi re way D i g o e north- The surround ti area is heav g urtanze n su ro er. of to ns severe older singe family homes. 8. Estimated Date for Completion of Proposal: One year from approval 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Approvals Required for the Prooosal (federal, state at, local - including rezones): a) Building permit b) Approval of sewage treatment c) Improvements to Mission Avenue (IF SPACE' FOR EXPLANATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTAC;i ADDITIONAL ?AGE` 10a. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, nave any plans ="or suture expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain: No I 1 • 10b. Do you own or have options on land nearby or adjacent to this proposal's location? If yes, explain: No. 11. Do you know of any plans by others Including the owner which may affect the property covered by your proposal gr land adjacent or nearby? If yes, explain: so, 12. Attach any other application form that his been completed regarding the proposal; if none has been completed, but is expected to be filed at some future date, describe the nature of such application form: See Zone Change Application I.J. g"IRQNII XAL OVACTS (Explanations of all "yes" dnd "maybe" answ,rs are requirea) Y~ Maybe No 1. lir i. Will the proposal result in: (a) Unstable earth conditions or in changes in geologic structures? . . . . . ( b ) Disruptions. displacements, cmpacti on or ovemoveri ng of the sail? . . . . . . (c) Change in topography or ground surface relief features? . . . . . . . . . . . X (d1 The destruction, covering or modification of any unique geologic X or physical features? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (a) Any increase in wind or water erosion or soils, either an or off the site?. X (IF SPACE FOR EXPI,AKATION IS INADEQUATE, PLEASE ATTACH ADOITIONAL PAGES.) (f) Changes in deposition of erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river qr stream X or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? . . . . , . . , . . . 1anit_ion: _ Because the site is level., no changgs in the toDOe?~:.: of the site are anticipated other than excavations for footings e n e arki, lot. Most f thg-.Site XJY1 be MLJJiUd ar, 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: LU Kay~d N3 (a) Air missions or deterioration of ambient air quality? . . . . . . . . . . • .2L ,,..MM,, (b) The creation of objectionable odors? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • • • (c) Alteration of air movement, moisture or temperature, or any change in X climate, either locally or regionally? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Eagl naa Lion: Parkin will b RroyideSL f i Air emissions will result but a would be significantly adverse, 3. Waster. Will the proposal result in: !A Ma.U N0. (a) Change in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, X in either marine or fresh waters? (b) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patters, or the rate and X amount of surface water runoff? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X . (d) Change in the amount of surface water in any water body?. . . . . . . . . . _ (e) Oischarge into surface water, or in any alteration of surface water quality. including but not limited to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (f) Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters?. . . . . . (g) Change in the quantity of ground waters. either througn direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? - (h) Deterioration in ground water duality, either througn direr, injection, or through the seepage of leachate, phospates, detergents waterborne virus or bacteria, or other substances X into the ground waters? . . . . . . . . . . . . . • • • (i) Reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for X public water supplies?. . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . . . . 2 Explanation: Almost 80% of the site will be covered with paved parking areas or buildings requiring drywells for surface ct &rnundwater quality . ' 4. Flora,. Will the proposal result in: Yep, Maxbe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or nuber of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and X aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the nubers of any unique, rare or endangered X species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishnent of existing species? . . . . . . . . . _ (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: The site is currently _occu2ied by houses and garages and retains no native flora or fauna. 5. Fun . Will the proposal result in: Yes Mayb ,No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and X shellfish,.benthic organism , insects or microfauna)? . . . . . . . . . . (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered X species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result X In a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . • X Explanation: The site is currently occupied by houses and garages and retains no native flora or fauna. 6. Nooi_s~e.. Les. Ma, b No (a) Will the proposal Increase existing noise levels? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: Cars utilizing parking lot may generate some activity; however this will be confined rimaril to da time hours and thu no disturb t e or oo a n a amount ve ~u ar xacratp- 11 nO 1. Light and Glare Yep, M4vbg No (a) Will the proposal produce new light.or glare?. . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: The par in& lot area will bp. illuminaLpper , esidenLJ.d~ Office standards. Since most of the activ- ity will be confined h should not create any ady_er s e effects _T_ 8. Land Use. Yes Ma No (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or X planned land use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . • Explanation: Planning Commission policies over the last 7 ears Rave supported Ke?ld n a ce type eve o ments a qn 'Pines P i have also been approved for Residential Office development. 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: 'yes `"avbe 11c (a) Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? . . . . . . . . . . _ X_ (b) Depletion of any nonrenewable natural resource? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: 3 h ~Q. Risk of U It. Does the proposal ihvolve a risk of an explosion or the Yew M&Xbe No release o hazardous substances (including, but not limited to, oil, pesticides, chemicals, or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: 14, Population. Ln Maybe ho Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density,, or growth rate of the human population of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Exo1 anati on : 12. Houssin_a. 114 M542 No WI T I the proposal affect &*i sti ng housing, or cregte a demand for additional housing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x [AplinAtion: N w houRijig may b e i i iona s-g rv_i c e~: mE 1 oYetis • 13. T goo talon/Circulacton. Will the proposal result in: L. Ma X92 92 lo- ( g) Generation of additional vehicular movaent : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i- (b) Effects on existing parking facilities, or Qemand for now parking? . . . . X (c) Impact upon existing transportation systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement X Of people and/or goods? . . . . . . . . . (e) Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic?. , . . . . . . (f) Increase in traffic hazards to motor vehicles. bicyclists, or pedeselans? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x ian i n: Additional vehicular movement will ocgul which will -nave some effects-on pa i g existing systems circulation Th, design of the site and access to Mission Avenue alone should 14. Pu li Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon. Or result in M N,.o in a nee or new or altered governmental ;ervices in any of the following areas: (a) Fire protection? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .,.Z. (b) Police protection? . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ (c) Schools? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (d) Parks or other recreationl facilities? . . . . . (e) Maintenance of public facilities. including roads? . . . . . . . . . . . ..2L - (f) Other governmental services? . . . . . • . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . Explanation: These services will bg reg]AIred_,.f or the nrQOO~sal__ Existing s st ms should he able to adVqUjjtp. Rrovide e with only minor alterations 15. Wray. Will th' orooosal result in: Yep Mavoe_ No (a) Use of substantial amounts of fuel or energy? . . . . . . . . . . . . . X_ (b) Demand upon existing sources of energy, or require X the development of new sources of energy?. . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: The proposal will create a new demand for energy for heating, cooling, lighting, etc. The demand should not be si ificant . 1' '!,1 F... , .y,'nl f11 NM i IM; '•u ,1j~N1 •Via, 1 •4 1 t ' .I, t:t r 1, ' y + r.~ y, , + i Stu : , ~•L j • y~l In 1 ' it { t. i ' , f IT • + ' ti: . • 1h1~' , ,ttl ~y~. i 1t ~ t. - 'i 4N~ i t 4~7f 'i. t f+ 16. U'llities. Will the proposal resul t I" a need for ner syStMs Y y No Or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Parer or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X _ (b) Com eunication systeafas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X ( c ) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Sewer or septic tanks?. X (e) Stem water drainage? . • . . . . . . . . . . X (f) Solid waste and disposal? ExDI anatlOn: Thegg 8 wi ro o s al . ad"Agtg 3 with 17. HUM An H 1th. Will the propos;l result in the creation of my health p~utards potent a1 heal hazard (excluding Mental health)?. X or falla rA on: ~8. A 1 . Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic Mfsta or mum Nn 0010 open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creatiop pf ai►; X aesthetically offers i ve t i to open to public view? "s" ;i . !4 Iva 19. r . Will the propo:a 1 reeu 1 t in an i"act upon the qua 1 i q► oc ~ Raybe I NO owtity of existing recreational opportunities?. 0 41 6 URI 104111 go 20~ Ar 1 1 1 H i r, a 1. Will the proposal reeul t In an alteration of a j( SiVnificant archeological or historical site, struCturep Object or baildingt.,~, M. SIGNATURE . I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- full misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificanee that it might issue i reli c• u this checklist. Date: Z - -3 --71 Proponent: (Please Print or Type) Proponent: Grant Groesbec% Address: N. 909 Pines Road (2920L Phone: 926-9555 r ns erica 3itle Person completing form: ~ohH Sfoeger hone: 922-2222 Date: 11-26- Department or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Z115AJ&J Staff Member(s) Reviewing Checklist: //,M-. 0-.*,Ak s J v } ff, _ e y f L ~v tt~ yAr . f ~ E 1 f ~'I ^ Wit, ~ ra ~ ~...,.-r..w~M~b'4-.7~~ ' - - ~ . _ - ~i _ ~•.f >'3`tEl~ .ac~r ~Ca. fl^' l►3' ? • r• ~ L ~C-' - a_ .~"!~R~''~I►.=ar'~++`_.+4a"!~°~ Ali .4 w • it n. --T • 't ~4 ai71' . ;:ba t.lrsa, 1M.• - `c • : ta~ is ' 'Y'.►• ~ t , 1.00 ` ' •44 tii ~ a • . y 'A. t Iwo rtt ~ • ~~a ~}lam'.,-. '~d ~ /r►Y ~ •t~ at I AININIL -F, - - ~T 1 44. 7 rr R 2Of + ~r ~,...JYe~► ',ate. 5 -77 EUGENE CARSTENS North 1724 Union Road Spokane, Wash. 99206 Jan. 7 1980 Spokane County Zoning Hearing Examiner Commitee Broadway Center Building 2nd Floor I own property nearby the proerty applying for zone chan&e on the northwest corner of Pines Road and Mission. I have NO OBJECTION to this zone change. The short Xgl legal description of my property is:- OPPORTUNITY BLK 350 EXC W200' & EXC HWY & EXC CUL-D.E-SAC respectfuly yours Eugene Carstens 1~ evzt~ R E C E I V E JAN 10 1980 SPOKANE COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: JANUARY 10, 1980 TO: HEARING EXAMINER COMMITTEE FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT STAFF SUBJECT: ZONE RECLASSIFICATION NUMBER: ZE-252-79 1. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Grant Groesbeck STATUS OF APPLICANT: Owner- REQUESTED ZONING: Residential Office EXISTING ZONING: Agriculture, estahl ;here 1n;'1? PROPOSED USE: Office buildil-(") PROJECT LOCATION: Generally located at the northwest corner of Pines Road and Mission Avenue. ll. SITE PLAN INrnRMAT1;-)N SITE SIZi SITE CHARAC7-I I1:i`_> f li_ S: The ite is lc--1i1-1y Mat, slopes down towards the freeway on the north side, contains several structures and trees. NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER: The neighborhood is primarily residential to the west and south and office/commercial use to the east. The site is f1~~iJ I lip _ vaca(A IlOrllC'S, URIC i''= Il)c~ (1f:fll0~lsili'c-A, OIIF' duplex, undeveloped North 1-90 right-of-way East Church We~,t Single family home South Valley ambulance, sinyie family homes ZONING: North Agricultural, established, 1942 East Agricultural, established, 1942 We~.t Agricultural, established, 1942 Sot!th Agrictiltu--al Suburban, established, 1955 ZONE RECLASSIFICATI( 'UMBER: ZE-252-79 II. SITE PLAN INFORMATION (continued) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential NUMBER OF EXISTING BUILDINGS: 5 0-) be removed) NUMBER OF BUILDINGS PROPOSED: 1 Total Square Feet Unknown PARKING REQUIRED: Offi(.e - 1:400 III. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS On May 20, 1977, the Planning Commission approved a zone reclassification from Agricultural to Residential Office for a portion of this site. The reclassification was never finalized. IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED a) COUNTY FIRE MARSHAL 1. The site is located in Fire District #1. I i1f~pllLcillt sllclll d-ul(c)t_~ ci -'u lout I'cldl,ls ull Mission Avenue and Pines Road. 2. Access to Pines Road to be prohibited CIt this time. 3. Applicant shall construct cement concrete curb, sidewalk and pave to existing pavement on Mission Road and Pines Road . 4. Appropriate on and off-site dr,imcige irid icuess plans shell he approved by the Spokane County Engineer's Office prior to the issuance of building permits for the project' 5. The design, location and arran(p rTwnt of parking stalls shall be in accordance with standard traffic engineering practices. Any portion of the project which is to be occupied or traveled by automobiles shall be maintained in hard surface paving. c) WATER PURVEYOR 1. Prirveyor is Modern Electric Water Company and will supply the site with adequate water for domestic fire and irrigation uses. d) COUNTY HEALTH DIST-RIC7 1. Depending upon sewage flow design this project may require DSHS approval and disposal of effluent in non-paved areas. 2 ZONE RECLASSIFICATIC)" 'IUMBER: ZE-252-79 IV. AGENCIES CONSULTED/COMMENTS RECEIVED (continued) e) SEPA 1. That the provisions of SEPA's Notice of Action pursuant to 43.21C.080 RCW be initiated by the applicant within thirty (30) days of final action of the Responsible Administrative Body and be completed before any site improvements are made. f) ZONING 1. Approval by the Zoning Administrator of a specific lighting and signing plan for the described property prior to the release of any building permits. 2. A specific landscape plan, planting schedule and provisions for maintenance acceptable to the Spokane County Zoning Adminis- trator shall be submitted with a performance bond for the project prior to release of building permits. 3. The applicant shall develop subject property generally in accordance within the concept presented to the Hearing Examiner Committee. Minor variations when approved by the Zoning Administrator will be permitted, including, but not limited to the following changes: Building location, landscape plans, an,' general allowable uses of the permitted zone. All variations mus! conform to regulations set forth in the Spokane County Zoninq Ordinance. The original intent of the development plans shall be maintained. 4. The request has proven to be environmentally non-significant. Therefore, a final declaration of non-significance shall be signed by the Chairman of the Hearing Examiner Committee. 3 \~J, v t R ~i i.ARUSLE d ~ EAMwL- w' - - - 10 - goy . E~252~79 X11 EL t965C. SHI►.NNO ' v - N - 1M(`NTGOMERY - 90 O Ve z 0 „ Noll 1 ' t 61 I O' z t5 C 0 Z tc~vran O ti iELY 4 : MISSION A\ Yi A xw E x ; i Q a 44 NE~t_ I SoNTO 1 r I ` iwT 0 i - - ~ SCR Y 3 < BOONS AVE- < DESME-T ' Ar+ r 2 '~6 ► DE5 M ET AV E - LAJ -C ATA G L D W 6- Blake 00 s T Q tn. > 8 AY ti POW 16 -4S EL 2 3pf; ' I s-ne 5 J L n o'r ~ .&V F P. H~ hoc l~/ -1'~ K Av AL.X1 ALK I - W Levi Avi < J OLIVE ~ Z ALLEY wAY WALL-Er w r' _ I X L1N Z x r N1A~N O ~ A,y-E Avg ~ ~K`o~ ~ a _ ~ Ill ~ i0E t , bL ; r ac . RIVERSIDE ~ Q 3 x ~ ~ c ~n =AEft. 1993 ° EL. ~99 - SPRAGUE VE- Q 2 31 2f i • PCST 1 CE V Q 1 nvF r I Cc ii 4 / t ROA D a - _ K rd f o ,QO - _1 r~ L FOURTH AN D t 4TN 4TH AVE. x t J o Z 0 o T CO tY ra 0 Z 6TH Q S~xT H 3 six ~E _ AVE.z~ r AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING COUNTY OF SPOKANE 1 Being first duly sworn on oath, deposes and says: That I am a citizen of the United States of America and a resident of the State of Washington, and over the age of eighteen years. That on the day of 1979, I personally deposited in the United States mail at n.'r, ~ i L4 )A wit u ficient stage prepaid, a tribe and correct copy of the NOTICE OF HEARING, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, to the recorded real property owners and/or taxpayers, as shown on the Spokane County Treasurer's records as of the day of , 19 , who have been found to own property within a four hundred (400) periphery of the applicant's controlled property and did notice adjacent property owners to the site by certified mail. The notices were addressed to those individuals and sent to those addresses as indicated on the attachment attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. DATED this day of 19. SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to me this 2 g`r 4 day of ~~~w Yom-- , 19 NOTARY UBL C IN AND OR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at Spokane, Washington APPLICATION NUMBER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING STATE OF WASHINGTON ) SS. COUNTY OF SPOKANE ) Being first duly sworn, deposes and says: That at times mentioned herein he was, and now is, a citizen of the United States, a resident of Spokane County, Washington, and over the age of twenty-one years. That on 3,Z-42 , 1979, he personally posted a true and correct copy of the hereto attached NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING at the following location in Spokane County, to-wit: 1Jt~2tfit ~T' of pl N Rn~s 'D . l~ pplicant or Agent Subscribed and sworn to me (2- Z~ 19 z. NOTARY PUBLIC 4N AND FOR SPOKANE COUNTY, WASHINGTON Residing at S kane, Washington zE- V4- 7 q I Certification of Title Company: I hereby certify that the following list of names and addresses has been prepared from the latest available recur s and is to the best of my knowledge correct. r' Sign d; For: I w Date. /7 r R' l i i f I R 1 M e }P i I FORM A APPLICATION FOR ZONE RECLASSIFICATION SPOKANE COUNTY Date: November 21, 1979 Application No: ZE -.25-Z- 7 Name of Applicant: Grant Groesbeck Street Address of Applicant: N. 909 Pines Road City: Spokane State: Washington 9920h -Telephone T~ o . 926-9555 Existing Zoning Classification: Agricultural Date Existing Zone Classification Established: 4-24-42 Existing Use of Property: Single Family Residential s Proposed Zone Classification: Residential Office Proposed Use of Property: Office Space Legal Description of Property: All of Block 352. and h F. .t- 1 77 , 55 fPPt of Block 353- Opportunity lying S03it-h of Inters tats go- E~Eeept these , portions deeded to Spokane County and the State of Washington for roadways, Situate in the County of Spokane State nf ~ hl ~T Section: 9 Township ~s Range: -4~ Source of Legal: Title Company Assessors Parcel Number: (See Tax Statement) 09544-0110, 0111, 0107, 0108, 0109, 3.07 01061 0105, 0104 Property Size: 419W acres ± Total amount of adjoining land controlled by this owner or sponsor: -0- Street Address of the Property: N 1600 Pines Rd Who Holds Title to the Property: Applicant If you do not hold title to the property affected by this applicati.^, what is your interest in it ? N/A Furnish a letter from a Title Insurance Company, showing the property owners of record, their address, within 400 feet of the exterior boundaries of subject property. )o > (D-4 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST File ZE-252-79 f►OwAwt COUX" COue? -Ousl sec-Twp-Rng 9 - 2 5 - 44 Introduction: The State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, Chapter 43.21C, RCW, requires all state and local governments agencies to consider environmental values both for their own actions and when licensing private proposals. The Act also requires that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared for all major actions significantly (and "adversely". as per WAC 197-10) affecting the quality of the physical environment. The purpose of this checklist is to help the agencies involved determine whether or not a proposal is such a major action. Please answer the following questions as completely as you can with the information presently available to you. Please answer questions as "yes" or "maybe" if, in your opinion, even only slight impacts will result. The reviewers of the checklist will be award of and cancer themselves with the decree of impact, asking you for more information, if necessary. Where explanations of your answers are required, or where you believe an explanation would be heloful to government decision-makers, include your explanation in the space provided, or use additional pages, if necessary. You should include references to any reports or studies of which you are aware and which are re evant to the answers you provide. Complete answers to these questions now will help all agencies involved with your proposal to undertake the required environmental review without unnec- essary delay. The following questions apply to your total proposal, not just to the license for which you are currently applying or the proposal for which approval is sought. Your answers should include the impacts which will-be caused by your proposal when it is completed, even though completion may not occur until sometime in the future. This will allow all of the agencies which will be involved to complete their environmental review now, without duplicating paperwork in the future. No application shall be processed until the checklist has been completed and returned to the appropriate County department. State law requires explanations for every "yes" and "maybe" answer on the checklist. The person completing the form may be required to provide explanation for "no" answers, and in some cases, more detailed information to aid in a threshold determination. NOTE: This is a standard form being used by all state and local agencies in the State of Washington for various types of proposals. Many of the questions may not apply to your proposal. If a question does not apply, gust answer it "no" and continue on to the next question. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. BACKGROUND 1. Name of Proponent: Grant Groesbeck Phone Number 926-9555 2. Address of Proponent: N. 909 Pines Road Spokane, Wa 99206 3. Date Checklist Submitted: November 26, 1979 4. Agency Requiring Checklist: Spokane County Planning S. Name of Proposal, if Applicable: N /A 6. Nature and Brief Description of the Proposal (including but not limited to its size, general design elements, and other factors that will give an accurate understanding of its scope and nature): See Attached 7. Location of Proposal (describe the physical setting of the Proposal, as well as the extent of the land area affected by any environmental impacts, including any oth r information needed to give an accurate understanding of the environmental setting of the proposal): 'he propo sal is situated on gthhee~northwe t corne-V of Pines and Mi$sion with ac ess rom,Mis$ion as rnn P-qpp wit-h i-bp nlliinft- -rnn h c T4 cl Q I- C% -I 4Q r- era iv eve wi re w o Wgtge o p t e nort e surrounei. g area is eavi.~y urganize su J ect property con- tains several older single family homes. 3. Estimated Date for l--cmpietion of Proposal: One year from approval 9. List of all Permits, Licenses or Government Aoorovals gecuirea for the Droocsai 'federal„ state anc local - including rezones,,: a) Building permit b) Approva of sewage treatment c) Improvements to Mission Avenue LF SPACE =4R EXPL.ANATION :S I114ACE,IUATE, 31--EASE. .-477ACH =LT7.0NAL ?.tiGQ- ; !Ca. Do you, or the owner in the event you do not own the subject land, nave anv plans for fljture .cdi:ices. expansion, or further activity relatea to or connected 4ith this arooosal? :f Ives, exolain: No 1 Explanation: Almost 80% of the site will be covered with paved parking areas or buildings requiring drywells for surface rainage e snoutd nor n affect . ' groundwater clta_ity. 4. Flora. Will the proposal result in: Yes Maybe No (a) Change in the diversity of species, or nuber of any species of flora (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, microflora, and aquatic plants)? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Reduction of the nubers of any unique, rare or endangered species of flora? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (c) Introduction of new species of flora into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? . . . . . . . . . X (d) Reduction in acreage of any agricultural crop? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: The site is currently occupied by houses and garages and retains no native flora or fauna. 5. Fauna. Will the proposal result in: Yes Mavbe No (a) Changes in the diversity of species, or number of any species of fauna (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish,.benthic organisms, insects or microfauna)? . . . . . . . . . X (b) Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare, or endangered X species of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (c) Introduction of new species of fauna into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of fauna? . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Deterioration of existing fish or wildlife habitat? . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: The site is currently occupied by houses and garages and retains no native flora or fauna. 6. Noise. Yes Maybe No (a) Will the proposal increase existing noise levels? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: Cars utilizing parking lot may generate some activity; however this will be confined primarily to daytime hours and thus not disturb the ei or oo a nighi, The mou>at Q ,vehicular noise generated y e p onnsai sh u n P- -,igni- r-ant-- 7. Light and Glare Yes Mavbe No (a) Will the proposal produce new light or glare? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: The parking lot area will be illuminated per Residential Office standards. Since most of the activity will be confined h should not create any adverse effects. 8. Land Use. Yes Ma~ vbe No (a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X • Ex lanation. Planning Commission policies over the last 7 ears ave suppor e e i tntia ice type developments a qng Pines Road Portions o Mission Avenue near the VallPv HnsDifM have also been approved for Residential Office development. 3. Natural Resources. Will the oroposal result 4n: 'es '0a--/--e 'Ic ,a) Increase 4n _he rate of use of any natural -esources? . . . . . . . . . . . - X (b) Geolet'on of any nonrenewable natural resource? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ X Exolanation: 3 16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need for new systems, Yes Maybe No or alterations to the following utilities: (a) Power or natural gas? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (b) Communication systems? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (c) Water? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (d) Sewer or septic tanks? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (e) Storm water drainage? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X (f) Solid waste and disposal? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: These utilities will be necessary for the proposal. Existing and new systems should provide adequate service with a minimal effect. Yes Maybe No 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in the creation of any health hazards or potent al health hazard (excluding mental health)?. . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or Yes Maybe No view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? . . . . . . . . . . . . X Explanation: 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or Yes Maybe No quantity of existing recreational opportunities? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Explanation: 20. Archeological/Historical. Will the proposal result in an alteration of a Yes Maybe No significant archeological or historical site, structure, object or building?. 7 Explanation: III. SIGNATURE I, the undersigned, swear under the penalty of perjury that the above responses are made truthfully and to the best of my knowledge. I also understand that, should there be any will- full misrepresentation or willful lack of full disclosure on my part, Spokane County may with- draw any declaration of nonsignificance that it might issue i reli ce u this checklist. s~ ~.v> Date: 1 Z 3 7 Proponent: (Please Print or Type) Proponent: Grant Groesbect Address: N. 909 Pines Road (99206) Phone: 926-9555 Person completing form: ~rg ns toeser Phone e 922-2222 Oate: 11-26-79 Ceoartment or Office of County Reviewing Checklist: Z O/ fu& Staff alember(s) Reviewing Checklist: S File 1 t~ Sec. T1sh1 p S R1ge Classification 1~U Proponents ~-c S P O K A N E C O U N T Y STAFF REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST I. In accordance with the Spokane County Environmental Ordinance and WAC 197-10, an Environmental Checklist has been submitted by the applicant or his agent. This checklist and any additional pertinent data has subse- quently been reviewed by the The following data briefly describes the proposal: A. Actions(s) Requested: Zone Change Preliminary Plat Approval ; Final Plat Approval Change of Condition ; Other B. Description of Proposal: C. Location of Proposal: II. Review of Checklist: A. Slight adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: (1) Earth (8) Land Use (15) Energy (2) Air (9) Natural (16) Utilities Resources (3) Water (10) Risk of Upset (17) Human Health (4) Flora (11) Population (18) Aesthetics (5) Fauna (12) Housing (19) Recreation (6) Noise (13) Trans/Circ (20) Arch/Hist (7) Light/Glare (14) Public (21) Other Services B. Potentially significant adverse impacts are noted under the following questions: Revised 6/1/79 ZONING WORKSHEET Form C Applica tion # This document will provide the Planning Department Staff with written verification that: 1) The site's legal description has been reviewed by the Engineering and Planning Departments who agree that the legal description is acceptable. 2) That the proposed development can meet the requirements of the County Health District, the County Engineers, the County Utilities Department, County Fire Marshal and Water Purveyor. 3) That adequate provisions for the proposed development can be provided for: residential, commercial, industrial and mining uses. An applicant is required to present a copy of the proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN with this worksheet to each of the listed agencies for their review and determination as to whether the proposal can meet minimum State, County and Health District require- ments. (Note: Applicant shall contact indicated agencies in secruence listed below PART I - to be completed by Spokane County Engineer A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Spokane County Engineer's Office and the proposed development has been reviewed. 1) State DOT Review required: ✓ Yes -No. 2) Access to be limited to: 3) Access permit is required. 4) a. ,}dc's Dedication for right-of-way is required. ( feet on Road, Street, Avenue.) b. Radius ( -Z o foot) is required. (On g S/:a- ~ and i~'her s Road, Street, Avenue.) C. _ Slope easement is required S) 5 Drainage Plan is required. on-site off-site . ~ct ✓C 4n car S~ 6) t!!,s Paving Permit is required. L- feet on Road.) 7) Curb is required, (along M !ss~'U~7 -Road, Street, Avenue.) 8) Sidewalk is required. (along Road, Street, Avenue.) 9) Applicant must be willing to participate in future LID/RID. 10) Legal description is acceptable as reviewed. Parcel No. Comments: Signed Da to ZO-NING WORKSHEET--continued-? PART_N -to be completed by Spokane Coun_v rrt;litjes- ment A preliminary consultation meeting has titian hale ,v tl- the E cc'= ~ ne U: t~; and the proposed development plans have been reviewed. 1) The proposed development is/is not located in a public sewer service area operated and maintained by Spokane. County. 2) A storm drainage plan is/is not required for the proposal. Comments: S igned Date ' PART III- to be completed by Spokane County Water Purveyor :SEE: /5TTAG14E A,AP FnE Z-AAJO AZEA z -79 A . Water Supple ` ss lo N A t/,E 1) The proposed development is located with the VODE district boundaries. 2) Satisfactory agreement/arrangement has as not been made to serve this proposal. 3) We ar /are not able to supply this development with adequate potable wa ter. 4) We are/are not able to supply this,development with adequate water for fire flow, - C4010u174 l.~,i~~► Fiid 1yarsi4j1 S) Water Purveyor is public, private community, private, other: 4a 4d Dtup ed c&- v h 6) Water systemlSki(/**"'is not under State Utilities jurisdiction. 7) Indicate size of main for hook up: /D inches. 8) Distance to main: So {Y• feet. B. to be completed by Applicant 1) Individual water supply will be developed with/without fire protection capabilities. Comments: Signed Date C . If proposal is outside the boundaries of any water district, the State Department of Social and Health Services must review the proposal prior to application. 1) I/We have reviewed the proposal. It appears to meet State requirements for public water. ..41124 Signed - D.S.H.S. • ' ZONING " RKSHEET continued-3 PART IV - to be completed by Spokane County Fire Marshal 1) Proposal is located in Fire District # 2) QCS Access and circulation for emergency vehicles is required. 3) Fire flow is/ s no adequate for proposed development ~s is not required. 4) ~•S Main (s) need to be installed. S) Hydrant(s) need to be installed 6) Water Supply Cistern shall be installed (of Gallons) 7) Nearest fire hydrant is feet. 8) Driving distance to nearest fire station is Comments: An& 294AQ0Az- '7 Si ed Date PART V - to be completed by Spokane County Health District A preliminary consultation meeting has been held with the Health District and the proposed development plans have been reviewed 1) The proposed provision of sewage treatment and disposal appears to be feasible and desirable at this time by the following means: septic tank; lagoon; treatment plats; other: Other methods considered were: , 2) Air quality i s not concern with this proposal. 3) Ground water quality 6/is not a concern with this proposal. 4) Noise is/ s no concern with this proposal. S) Light 0/is not a concern with this proposal. 6) Proposal is subject to review and approval of final plans. Comments: Signed Date L E G A L J c S C R I P T j 0 N L 1 S T DECEMBER 14. i ER 1.4, 1 9 SPOKA~dF CGUNTY REAL LANO FILE PARCEL OQCUMENT NUMBER NUMDER ASSESSED i?WNER LEGAL 'IESCf+TPTIG.V OF PROPEFTY TAXP4YE 0954 7900218163 A7PUIM OPPORTUNITY PT OF 8352 ATRIUM E89FT OF 5172.5FT OP N345~T ExL HWY ~ GROFSBEC!C TAXPAYER FSBECK GRAIN N 909 SINES SPOKANE kA PINES RD NF WA ?'206 09544-0105 7900218163 ATRUIN OPPCRT~JPJITY PT C1F 8352 ATRIUM W78FT OF E88fT Of 51?.OFT E ~ROES3ECK N 909 PINES SPOKANE HA ES3ECK GRANT PINES RD NE WA 49206 09544-0106 7900218163 ATRUIM OPPORTUNITY N148FT Of aTR[UN E236FT (3352 EXC HWY b GROFSr~ECK EESBFCK 'RANT N 9.79 PINES SPOKANE NA PINES RD NE WA 919?06 09544-0107 7900216163 4T4UIM OPPORTUNITY PT OF X3352 GROESBECK r,RA WL77.86FT EXC S13CFT OF E161.86FiEEXC HWV N 909 P[NES SPOKANE WA ECiK GRANT F PINES RD NE WA 9920 09544-0108 7900218L63 ATP.UiM OPPORTUNITY 8352 ATRIUM S130FT OF ElO1.R6FT QF ~1117.66FT ~ GRG[SBECK N 9~J9 PINTS SPOKANE wA ESBECK GRANT PI IN F S RD NEE WA 9 9206 09544-0109 79002181 3 ATP'J[~1 O~P(IRTUNITV 9352 gTKIUM S130FT OF E60FT OP N177.SbfT b GRpESbECK N 909 P(NF$ SPOKANE WA ESBECK GRANT P INFS RD rSF WA '5;206 09544-O1L0 7900212285 G F GROESd[CK OPPnRTU'VITY E38.78FT ~`pnC 1ST FEO S 83.53 EXC PT DEED[0 TC1 STkTE B~ DOC 714951 P, 13-12Q154 1 E ~a UoS T FED S&L SPa 315 - 09544-Olll 7800190118 G F GROES6ECK OPPOKTUNITY PT OF 3353 GROESBECK GR,~ E88.77FT OF W3`5.08F7 FX~ HWV N 904 PINES SPOKANE WA ECK GRANT F PINES Rr) NF WA 99206 09544-0112 1031769 R A HOOT OPPORTUNITY PT CF 3353 HOOT RGBERT A :)B ER-T A L -V `~~FT=F~'~~ ~17T.54FT OF W266.31FT EXC HWY E 12017 MISSI 17 MISSION AVE SPOKANE NA ~F WA ,99206 09544-0116 7700163412 EDYTHf E BROWN OPPC)RTUN[TY E93.69FT BROMN EDYTHE (3354 W 2332 MA (.L O SPGK4NE WA - E D YT H E E ? MAELON AVE 4E WA 9 ,201 - 09544-Off01 2832266 P D SAROAM SARDAM SUB ll Al SARDpM PORTER. PORTER n'4 90X llfii4 1614 SPOKANE YiA qE wA 99211 09544-~~Sn? 2R3226C P 7 SAR~A~! saa~a~ SUB L2 B1 sasrna~r PORTER P nR-TER 1) 30X 11614 SPOKANE WA L614 " F WA 9421.1 09544-0803 283?26C P U SARDAN SAFD4M SUL' l3 91 SAK04M PORTER PORTER 0 90X L1614 L614 SFOKANF WA 4E A "211 - 09544-0804 2$32266 N q SARDAM SARDA~N SUB L4 B1 SAROAM PORTER GX 11b14 1514 SPCK4~lE WA ,'NE WA 99211 - ~ 09544-0605 2832260 P U SAHDAM SAKDA4 SUN L5 B1 SAROAM PORTER 1 PORTER D BOX llf>14 10,14 ~r'~~i~ SPOK4NE WA NE WA 99211 ~n~y 16541-0218 3583043 HUMBLE OTLf,REF OPPCP,TUNITV PT OF 85 ~YUNS S L WAI_ C6{nZF1Sfj ~y/~c, F163.4FT OF A;2/5 QF N1/7 E 10405 BhLF SPOK4NE W4 R & WALLER .05 BALFOUR CT NE "WA ~~20b L6541-0232 660361L D A t~4LlER OPPORT~JN[TY PT OF 85 WALLER DARRpL ✓CrK~~~kU ~J~y?~' H3/4 OF NZ/5 iiF .V1/2 EXC ~~416.4FT E 10405 BALD SPOK4NE WA DARROLL A 05 BALF BUR CT - - NE WA 99206 ~Jy !i1'~1b541-0231 2296230 t. lAR SON OPP[1RTUN[ TY PTN OF ~W4LL[R OARRA v~6K"rs~3Ei~ /?7H7~' /y~oy /"/~~ss~^' 135; E77FT C)F NJ_/S ~F N1/2 QF w416.4F1 E 10405 SALF SPOKANE NA -1)A-RR- OLL 4 05 BALFOUR CT NE WA 9G206 6541-0215 1700152L$6 OON N 'IAAlFkFU QPPfJRTUNITY PT Of 35 f,R? NM FEU SE ~.(~ERTSFZLQ ~ry/,'~L. ~U, j~~, U,~;~eaa%~`y lfd• E169. TFT OF k339.4PT Qf N?/5 OF VI/2 09 0130A 0266541-41_21 790Q207343 !F V HELHLING OPPORTUNITY H5 El00FT 4cA5H MUT SAV ✓C~R-rzF3ED /rl/Yl~. ~ /1y;3$;aw OF W169.7FT OF N7./5 OF N1/2 V1 023 25185 I lal r-l- FEU S&L 308 026241 9 UT SAV 8K 3 257354 - ~E'~16541-0216 7900207343 F U HECKLING OPPCIRTUWITY 95 woS.7fT !~"wASH NUT SAV CElNSFT&f~ ~i/i1L OF V2/5 OF N1/?. O1 X23 25785 UT SAV BK 3 257854 1b541-0222 5967818 RAYMOND RUWPERG OPPORTUNITY F50FT OF ROWBERG RAY'10 NSOFT Nb E 12019 M4XW SPOKAWF N4 G RAYS' 0ND 19 MAXWELL AVE NF WA 99206 K ~ M4 ' ' h„ OPP HEISTRUM RFPL fS3 4 SEAFIRST NTG L1 81 - RF 90845 ~ ST 4T11 CORP 845 ~ ~d5„ _ ~ OPP HFLSTP.UM RFP~ B3 4 CUMM ~iTG"' L2 R1 OOA21318 318 070 _ F FIF Plii OPPORTUNITY 95 El00FT w4SH MUT SAV IMF W169.7FT OF N2/5 OF "!1 /2 D1 023 257?35 41- 818 r r2G OPPORTUNITY ESOFT OF ROWBERG RAYMQ NSOFt Bb E 12019 MAXh - SPpK4NE MA UT SAV BK 3 257854 G RAYMOND ~ 19 MAXWELL AVE - NE WA 99206 ~k6'~4 739197A C l ERICKSOtV OPPORTUNITY W2/5 CF ERiCKSON CLIf - NF1/4 EXC 525FT Ei6 E 12006 MISS SPOKANf WA DN C LI-WORD LLA` - 06 MISSION AVE NF WA 99206 i b18 RIDE OPPORTUP:[TY PT [?F B8 RIDCR DOUGLAS DOUGLAS J W100FT OF E200FT GF N200FT OF W1/2 E 11516 MISS SPOKANC HA 16 MISSION AVi- NE WA 99206 ~6r+4~1- 087.6 SUN OPPORTUNITY ELgOFT OF ANDERSON GEOFi N200FT OF kl/? 93 [ 11522 M[SSi DN GEnRGE W 22 MI SSIn-N AVM SPOKANE NA NE WA 99206 ~b541-0103 7900209918 GEORGE JOYNER 0°P MISS[OA' PINES ti5 b CITY NTG SERVI 1- - TG SERVICES ~ F I~9~~ n1,is%°~ L3 S1 911421 1 UI, 1 1 p , 1 + 541-0161 7900?19099 F. R Uti1LU'~E ETUX PTS OF 2 4DD5: CATALt)C ASSI?C D ASSOC E253.bFT OF L1 a4 WISSIGN P1~a~5 SUH E253.tF7 C,f PTfv nF X35 N 1005 P[P~ES 5 PINES RD ~ OPPORTUNITY LYS S OF kISSIUN PINES SUB EXG S10UFT SPUKAIvE NA ~jF WA 99206 ~t~ 16541-O1 f+7 - 70194953 E B UNICUME OPP Mi5SI0N PINES R5-6 ~.~,~~UN[CUME ~~'w~AR N73.2FT LL E THE E26.S~T L2 d4 N 9U9 PINES R E EDWAR&I FINES RD I f - N - - F4 77 49706 i 16541-0166 7610140022 DAB! R t1AYf_R APP MI5SIOtJ PINTS 65-6 HAP.RIS ETHEI ~S/tea J%jv,ru/el~ W10~FT OF E126.RFT OF L2 84 INL VAC 30fT SIP 5 u7~ F: A~J 92E E 8TN ETHEL 8TH MOSCOW ID W ID 33843 HE CtAUVF A (16541-0139 7700167080 C A SCH[F.CHE UPP MISSION PINES B5 6 SCHIECHE ELAU N36.5FT L2;E63.4FT L3 84 (NC 30FT STP S C)F6au~ licl~v~ PT A5 OPP E 12112 MAXW SPOK4NE NA 12 MAXWELL AVE NE CIA 99206 X116541-A140 7610260300 W4~T F EaFF~E '1PP MISSION VINES D5 6 LINO NUT SAV UT SAV BK 06 C. /1/oY' ~y'o1weA v/100PT L3 H4 INC 30FT STP 5 Oi-EAOJ BEING Pi d; UYP 0!+ 0021901 021901 AR E S MTG7 v~16541-0141 7£300162490 C l FROST OPP MISSION PINES H5 6 84NCSHAkES MT ~~oy1. j'~aawn// NL35FT L4 H4 1705041 41 - x ~^u15542-0706 ?90209263 ,!A`4E5 F GUNBY MISSION VIEW S130FT GUNBY JAMES F L5 41 E 11204 23R0 JAMES F 04 23RD AVE SPOKANE ifA NF WA 99206 NG ROY L >~15542-0707 3$93958 F,(i~ L FRVHLING M(SSIC~N V1E1+ EXC S130FT FRYHLING ROY L6 B1 E 12318 MISS SPOKANE WA 18 MISSION AVE NF WA 99216 15542-0?08 943260A P 0 BA~1G MISSION VIEW ALL L7;F..Xf. TRIB[R HEl£N v~.L-~t~~s&~ /Y1A1~- 5. i~'v l~,RkRd' SbFT LS B1 E 17905 APPL ~ GREE+VACRES w 5542-07035 0000000 TIOFWATFk OIL CO MISSION VIEW PT OF L7-fl BESTMAY FUEL C'Sr2y2 F7&A ~A7L.. 81 AlL L7;ExC S6FT L8 E 1723 R(VER J -HELEN L 05 APPLEWAY AVE ACRES 6A 99016 Y FUEL & SPRAY 3 RIVERSIDE AVE S°CKANE WA NE WA 99202 - _A- 15542-4709 79002091.63 JAMES F GUNBY MISSION VIEW S6~T L9; GUN6V JAMES F JAMES F ALL L9 B1 E 1t204 23RD 04 23R_D AVE NE WA 49206 SPGKANE MA 15542-OTIO 7700153374 WESLEY C CROSITY ~1iSSI0N ViEw LID NL CRflSITY AESLfY WFSLEY CLINT-Of4- - - N 1506 PIN S 6 PINES RD SPOKANE NA NE WA 99206 15542-0711 6642320 0 N G[L6FRT MISSION VIEW P~1/2 L5 B1 FID MUT SAV Ci ~ 13 z~ I''~~~s 3 200 3 8149 T S A V BK 3 8 149 7 15542-0712 BA21796 f. E GCFFI~ifT MISSION VIE`n Sl/2 L5 P.1 GCiFFINET LAP.L N L420 PINES ET CARLYLE Ea D PINES RD SPOK4NE"tilA NE-WA - 910,206 0543-0220 0426578 UCM 7TH OAS AOV ASSESSORS PL 6 5244.4!"7 UCM 7TH OAY A ,~~,P~=~Z~D /7AZL EXC H~IY 321 N 151Q PINES H OAY ADV%4 SPOKANE NA n PINES R9 NF WA 99206 Ib543-0222 3137108 UWC 7TN DAY ADV 4SSESSORS PL b EXC t1WY 822 l1CM 7Tk OAY A N 1610 PINES H DAY ADS 0 PINES RD SPOKANE NA NE WA 99206 50 INPUT CARUS PROCESSED; Np G~RR[SPONDING PARC[LlS) FOUND GN f[l[ SUMMARY DATA: INPUT C4ROS PARCELS PR [N7 LINES 50 45 1 '.1~~~44-~11~ 1 E1201 i ~~~ISSIiii~ AVF t)►°~ fv ~ L E ~FIF~=E~T ~~IFEk1 LF t~~)Y E FIi~E '~~~~FE~='~ TAX S ~ COG Yk 1 X01 1 IS~If)~~ AVE ~E,~~l~. . . f~~,=~ 1 ~~!~.51 3 ~ 1 ~ Y9 a.~PaC~T~Jr~JITY ►'~~~.{.7r~°~I ;~,:=~~~is~,,~~~~=~ vALUr ~r`}-L ~o~c~ I 12~n~ 1 1 :.~?'1" l~~l;i ~1` r~~i~:~~ ~Di~P4~S ~T~i;~ ~~~iT C~),'~:~ Ai~~A COi~d~ 1~-P ~C) ~1~ ,p~~~,~ ~~R ti~r~ ~S i',~T I~~rt~C~ ~'17 (?I _0~ (~2 ff~~ 1CI~l _ I'~ (`F t~j0~/}O~s~l r t~ ~ (~I' r L {1 L ,''l 11 S~~fi tytt f,,~1~,.~"~ ~1~~1C U~~`: U`\~1.~ Lf}i ~14 L~~~~t~,.~ Al~iaCv ~'}1~1 ~ ~~rPf[ I1.~~ i r~, rbFf 11,~f' ~ 4~-G l I r ~}~'~r~i-L F S F I FEAT ~~IrE~~~ L1~ !~()Y E FIEF ~'~r"~~ SAX ~ F C()~ Yr3 12411 ~'~I~S~IO:~ AVE CEN:1. .~fl l~~.Ei~ 21~ 7~ t~~~~OI~TU~dITY i~3~~3F~I' UF~ AS~ESS~=1~ ~VAL~J1= ly~L I!1~~f~ ~16'~41-(~1Ui r~()~ar3? ~~u ~~AY?~i~)~i~ ~lrul~i~,:} ~~{:)~~J~"`>-~ i~~l ~ .4AXrV~LL. .AVE 5Ni)i~:r,~`JE dVA ~y2Qh t)P~' ~9I55IOlu NI~~[=S ~ ~S~=S~~ii;~~ 'V.~4~,~If= 1~~=L ~s~,r~n ESL V~2~t~1 LI ~3i I ? r~~4 I -~J 1 ~ r.. ~ ~ L~)L ~r~I~~ G~~~ I~SIc. ~ AVW ()sy~~-~I-~~~-~~ ~ ~7E_L}~~.I~~G ~ ~ ~ O1'I' ~'~~iIS~IO~~ 1'IidFS 1~5 « AS~1=55F1~ 'dAL~}F 1~=L 3rnn ,~~~I=1 Ll ~ f~LL L~ k3 i _ I 34~~~'~ ir~~~l-Ul~i ~ S~r1 riAL1~ LL~)Y~~ ~12~?1 I ~,,~~If(Vy~FLL ~VL= ()~~r,l=[. n.a~:,i~. ;dLTL l~ O l l „ti k;~;~~ F LL A v F 5E)()1~A~JE ~aA '~36 L~t~ Li I I ~4~~~~7 Ib~4i-O1~2 E1?(~1~~ 1'~iAY~'gELL AVF ()~w}~J=F~ ~?;)r~~EFI~t 1 ~~i y ~'~i,~~rC~~v}ALL .~,vE JE':)!i~l'v~ YrA ~~~f'1~ ~)w~ ;'~I S~ I~:~PI I:~1FS 135 b .gSS~S~E[) VALUE E~=L d5~0 L~ I 1~ I I :~31 I/1~~46~01~3 1~1?1~"~5 ?~iAX►~~~FLL AVM O~~~o~~bdy~;, ~'~ILAf~(aVI{;ii aJ~ILAIv13VI~rl r~~~ILLIA~~i fd r 12105 r,iAx~ti~~LL AVE ~~'()KAidE VVk ~~~20b I~If i~,i l r~ I'I~~ I DIES 135 b A5S ESS>yl~ VCzLU'° 7~=L ~5 r~0 L t? t:; f I I r~!~ Si~A~?E`~ JA~~~[ES i~ 1211 l t~~,AXI~~~LL Av!~ ~~'(~~r1.~J~. YyA yy'2'J~5 ~ll'I' ?~~ISSI(?;'d EIi~IES 6 A~~' ~~Ef~ VALUF 1~=L 45nr~, '~~~1~:~41-Oi?1~ ;.121 l~ ~A~~~aELL AVM ,~1=~.~I~I.i~~ '1.~~~~~ . _ 1 ~ , ..11 ~1~~E~i~ UA~~Y L I ? I 1 ~ f~ri A `rw e~~ ~ LL A U S1Jt)~;AI~dE ~~~A ~~2r)6 (l~F' i,~~I~~I()?~1 }'I~~S ~5 6 A~SESSEll VALUE l~=L 4510 L2 4 1~ 1 I 31 1 f!() ~i J~~`'~ 1a~41--Oi?_.b E1212:3 ~~dA~s^~ELL AVF ~~~1=KE'~I ..1 S~~ATJS();.1 L I I~~: P~,4 U'I- SA V 131{ 0 b b 9 24;3b 0 P}' l:~ I55I t}IJ I~ I DES E35 h AS~E5~E1J UALt)E 19=1 4~~n L2 ~ I I ~ 1 ~,~P, ~y~1LLEf~ liA4~~'f)LL A ~ i 0405 ~r1Li~t)IJ~ ~ S1~()KAN~ ~°aA y~20~~ t)l~l~ ~~ISSic)N f'Ii~'ES ~5 ~ ASSESSFi] v~ALUE r~=1x Ir,,~~~r~r, L2e tl I 1~~ (~~t N1 C24 iJNI()N. RD 0HT4=E'ENF CADS"1ri,S 944-0121 CARSTENS EUGENE A A 1724 UNION RD SPOKANE PiA 99200 OPPO RTU'lilTY BLK 3~)) EIC AF2SMSSED VALUF l)=I- 3nrn 'y a:~, b-. ) , .:d ~ n ~ y .sty. u P 4. ct:: i ~ . . . , .p. l „ i 09 ~ . ~ x AF ~ /qty d^R'% "..~a q yb...::; ~ , 1 ~ x J a. ~ # F: ...x a ;y ' A: . ;~.~.w. .q'?:.; y°: k:.`. > .M. Y H 5 ' ~ .d ~ ' . ti ~ 8 .ra:.. ~ e. .y y. gz..:. ~e 5: 'E.. ...ti:. . 'i...:a: ~ ~ 9 ..:ra..:: ~7~ S. ~ ~ A ''an a,r... s~ i i I i ~ F: .x s. ~ sa. is M ~n s. a . ~ I I M I J _ . _ x r ~ il a.